reSee.it - Related Post Feed

DiedSuddenly_
Posted - August 11, 2023 at 4:52 AM
Saved - August 11, 2023 at 5:11 AM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Joe Rogan: Dr. Pierre Kory Said 200 Members of Congress Were Treated With Ivermectin @joerogan was right: "I do not know the motivation for demonizing this particular medication," he added. "But I would imagine some of it has to do with money because... this a generic drug now. The patent has run out... and it's worth like 30 cent per dose." Never Forget.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the exposure of mainstream media and how it tries to dismiss and discredit them. They mention the framing of Ivermectin as horse medicine and find it amusing. They clarify that they took Ivermectin based on the judgment of a medical professional and list other medications they used for COVID treatment. They mention that 200 congresspeople have also been treated with Ivermectin. They speculate that the demonization of Ivermectin may be motivated by financial interests since it is a generic drug. The video ends with the information that Ivermectin costs around 30¢ per dose.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's fascinating, though. The ex exposing of mainstream media, that's one thing that I'm very happy about. Speaker 1: Don't call them mainstream because they're not mainstream. Right. Speaker 0: This this show is more mainstream than Speaker 1: they are. It's the corporate press. Speaker 0: It's more mainstream by a factor of 10 Speaker 1: Of course. Speaker 0: Which is pretty crazy. Speaker 1: But it's also funny how they will do everything in their power make you seem like you should be dismissed and not taken seriously. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. But it's not working. No. That that's what's fascinating. But this This framing of, like, Ivermectin as horse medicine was I'm in in some ways, I'm really happy that they did it to me. Because if they could not the Speaker 1: audience Yeah. Just blast back. Did you see that supercut? Yes. Yeah. Of of just one after another, them laughing at you? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Hilarious. Speaker 1: It's but also this is what's interesting. They kept saying that Ivermect first of all, it's like you called your dealer. You had it prescribed. Speaker 0: Right? Speaker 1: So when they say it's not approved, it's not like you are using your own judgment. You're using the judgment of a medical professional, which is what they've been yelling for a year and a half. Listen to the experts. Speaker 0: Well, not only that, I listed off a laundry list of medications and that's the one they focused on. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: I said I took monoclonal antibodies. I said I took prednisone. I said I took Z Pak. I said I had IV infusions of NAD and of vitamins, and I also took Ivermectin. I mean, it should be no surprise. I had doctor Pierre Kory, who's one of the doctors from the frontline critical COVID care group, that has been treating people including by the way, 200 congresspeople have been treated with Ivermectin for COVID. Did you know that? Speaker 1: I did not know that. Yeah. Holy crap. Speaker 0: Google that. 200. I believe you could probably find it in doctor Pierre Kory's, Twitter page. Yeah. Be before there were vaccines, This was a common treatment, an off label treatment for COVID. Now, I do not know what the motivation for demonizing This this particular medication is? Again, I'm not a doctor and I'm not a scientist, but I would imagine some of it has to do with money. The reason being is that it is a generic Drug now. They've the patent has run out. So anybody can make it, and it's worth, like, 30¢ a dose.
TheChiefNerd
Posted - August 12, 2023 at 12:06 PM
Saved - August 12, 2023 at 1:06 PM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚩 Dr. Mobeen Syed Shares Evidence That the FDA's Statements on Ivermectin Were More Than Social Media 'Quips' "Ivermectin somehow rose to the level of opioid drugs in the FDA's mind during the pandemic" @drbeen_medical @MdBreathe @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 https://t.co/2kU6UWCNiX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA denies commanding against the use of Ivermectin for COVID as an off-label prescription, but acknowledges warning about potential risks. They sent a letter to medical boards and pharmacies stating that available data does not show Ivermectin's safety and effectiveness, mentioning side effects and potential dangers. The FDA's counsel mentioned that they also issue warnings for opioid drugs. Blue Cross, an insurance company, sent letters stating that Ivermectin should not be prescribed for COVID. The CDC, FDA, American Medical Association, and American Pharmacists Association have strongly warned against Ivermectin use. They mentioned insufficient data and potential fraud, waste, and abuse patterns. Doctors were warned that their prescribing behavior would be monitored, and inappropriate prescribing could lead to consequences and termination of participation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FDA says we never commanded anyone to not use Ivermectin for COVID as an off label prescription. That's their basic essence. And they, the judges were talking with them in the context of this case, and I'll discuss the case in a second. The judges were saying that, no. You did say somewhere over here that stop it. And FDA said, well, even if we said that, that is only part that would be illegal, but the rest is fine. So how are they fine in their messaging? Here is how they're fine. This is the letter to president and chief executive officer, Federation of State Medical Boards, Humayo f Humayo j Choudhary. And to him, I had discussed this letter when it was sent out, December 13, 2021, where they're Talking with them saying recently FDA has received complaints about compounding pharmacies selling drugs, products containing Ivermectin, claiming that they can treat or prevent COVID nineteen. Then they go on and say currently available data does not show that Ivermectin is safe and effective. Then they continue and they say Ivermectin causes skin rashes and nausea and vomiting and blah. Then they say using Ivermectin products in preventing or Treating COVID nineteen may pose risk. We are also sending this letter to National Association of Board of Pharmacy to facilitate communication among associations with shared goals Goals regarding these matters. So they can actually FDA can say that here, there is nothing that we said don't use it. We were just warning that, hey. This could be dangerous. And it was very interesting in that, court hearing. One of the judge asked that How many other products you do this for? And the FDA's counsel said, well, we do it for the, opioid drugs as well. So Ivermectin somehow rose to the level of opioid drugs in FDA's mind during the pandemic. So this is one letter. I wanna show you some more interesting evidence. There is a letter here which was sent by the insurance company. And dear doctor and or health care provider, Ivermectin should not be prescribed for COVID nineteen or any use of this indication should immediately cease for our members. So this is Blue Cross sending these letters. Of course, FDA would say we have nothing to do with this. It's Blue Cross's policy. Go ask them. We have nothing. Putting words in their mouth, but I'm sure that that is the kind of position they'll take. Now what are others doing? They're saying The Center For Disease Control and Prevention, FDA, the American Medical Association, and the American Pharmacists Association have strongly warned against prescribing Ivermectin. The manufacturer of Ivermectin says it is also not useful And so on. Then if you see here, they threatened the the doctors to say Currently, insufficient data exists there prescribing authorization. So the Eye Medic and PPI Medic have identified potential fraud, Fraud, waste, and abuse patterns. So as soon as you tell a doctor that you are committing fraud, which I believe I'm I'm not a lawyer, which I believe is a a criminal offense. Do you think that the doctor would be saying, oh, well, you No. You're just trolling me. There's no legal basis for this. I can just keep on doing the doctor will become, a little hesitant or quite hesitant. So they said to the doctor this is a letter that the doctor kind of shared, that EyeMedic and PPI Medic have identified potential fraud, waste, and abuse Veterans. Prescribing authorization Ivermectin to beneficiaries in states where they are not medically licensed prescribing authorizing quantities, or blah. And then they also say here, Next steps. This was interesting. We will continue to monitor your prescribing behavior and may request to review patient charts. A determination that you have inappropriately prescribed Ivermectin could result in several consequences, including referral to our fraud and abuse department and or termination of your participation in our network, an action that would be reportable to national practitioners' databank.
VigilantFox
Posted - September 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 9:28 PM

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

.@JoeRogan Gives @BillMaher a Lesson on Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed "In order to utilize the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), they had to have no other remedies, no other effective treatment ... They didn't want any sort of way that you could get over this without taking their medicine."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the politicization of Ivermectin, an antiparasitic drug that also shows potential in stopping viral replication. They mention its success in treating yellow fever and winning the Nobel Prize. They express confusion over why a drug would be demonized and politicized. The conversation touches on the motivations behind this, including the desire to create a monopoly for vaccines and the Emergency Use Authorization Act. They highlight the affordability and accessibility of Ivermectin, which can be manufactured by anyone and costs only 7¢ per dose. The speakers also mention the discouragement and suppression of alternative treatments like monoclonal antibodies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, what about the way they demonize the Ivermectin thing? Yeah. I mean, it's a drug, not a politician. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: I I mean, why that something like that would ever become politicized, especially a drug that I believe when it first came out in 2015, was it? I think it won the Nobel Prize, the guy? Oh, okay. I I think it it wiped out some disease in Africa. Speaker 1: Yellow fever. Speaker 0: A yellow fever. Speaker 1: It's a it's an antiparasitic, but it shows it stops viral replication in vitro. It does have some sort of an effect, and there's we're I'm actually gonna Debate about it with this scientist and another guy who doesn't believe in it. It's a fascinating thing because Speaker 0: It's like getting mad at Sprint. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: It's not if it works for you and it plainly works for some people and works on a lot of things, I I I just don't understand that mentality. Speaker 1: Well, you know why they did it. Right? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, it certainly was important if you wanted to Create a monopoly for the vaccine. Speaker 1: Well, not just a monopoly, but the Emergency Use Authorization Act. In order to you to utilize the Emergency Use Authorization, They had to have no other remedies. There was no other effective treatment. And so any effective Treatment specifically, one that was, I mean, at the time, COVID or, Ivermectin rather had been around long enough that it was generic. So no one owned the patent on it. So anyone can manufacture it. It was, like, 7¢ a dose. It's nothing. It costs nothing. Speaker 0: Well, we can't have that. Speaker 1: We can't have that. No. And that that's also why they tried to discourage and then eventually suppress people from getting Monoclonal antibodies. They didn't want any sort of way that you could get over this without taking their medicine.
USBornNRaised
Posted - September 25, 2023 at 3:01 AM
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 1:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Extensive research by James O'Keefe revealed government knowledge on Covid and mRNA vaccine. His account suspension raised questions, possibly linked to Fauci's daughter. The findings indicate that in early 2020, DARPA knew Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and interferon were curative against Covid19. FOIA requests can provide the same information. Military documents contradict Fauci's testimony on gain-of-function. [Link: projectveritas.com/news/militarydocumentsaboutgainoffunctioncontradictfaucitestimonyunder]

@USBornNRaised - Tired of being politically correct

So, there was a nice man named James Okeefe @OKeefeMedia who did extensive research and got a FOIA request to see what our government knew about Covid and the mRNA vaccine. He received the documents, posted them online and his account was suspended. I guess Fauci's daughter working for old Twitter had something to do with it. What did he find you may ask? Well, he found out our government aka DARPA knew way back in early 2020 that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and interferon were curative against Covid-19. This means they cured covid. You can request the same information via a FOIA.

@USBornNRaised - Tired of being politically correct

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/military-documents-about-gain-of-function-contradict-fauci-testimony-under

Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath | Project Veritas Investigating and exposing corruption in both public and private institutions. projectveritas.com
VigilantFox
Posted - October 27, 2023 at 5:20 PM
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 6:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko, a renowned doctor, made significant contributions during the COVID-19 pandemic. He discovered the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc, resulting in a remarkable 99.96% survival rate among 7,000 patients. Despite a ban on hydroxychloroquine, he open-sourced an over-the-counter treatment protocol called Z-Stack. Dr. Zelenko correctly concluded that not everyone received the same lethal batches of the vaccine. He also warned against taking health advice from eugenicists like Bill Gates. He advocated for alternatives to the flu shot, such as Z-DTOX and Z-Flu. Dr. Zelenko criticized the use of masks, stating they were ineffective and harmful. He highlighted the damaging effects of the COVID-19 shots on the immune system. Dr. Zelenko's legacy lives on through his formulas and nutraceuticals.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

THREAD: Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko was more than a doctor; he was a divinely-inspired person. And his fearless, unapologetic way of truth-telling had a profound impact on the world. During COVID, at the hard-hit epicenter of New York City, Dr. Zelenko boldly treated patients on the front lines. While doing so, he discovered the power of hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc. This drug combo became an essential part of what came to be known as the “Zelenko Protocol,” which resulted in an impressive 99.96% survival rate among the 7,000 COVID patients Dr. Zelenko’s team treated, markedly surpassing the efficacy of the so-called vaccines. However, Governor Cuomo placed a ban on hydroxychloroquine, and Dr. Zelenko and his team no longer had access to this life-saving drug. Undeterred, he open-sourced an over-the-counter treatment protocol, also known as Z-Stack, to the world — which he called “the cure to tyranny.” The number of lives saved and the tremendous good Dr. Zelenko did for society cannot be overstated. But what also can not be overstated is Dr. Zelenko’s role as a bonafide truth-teller before he passed away on June 30, 2022. Here are five things the good doctor (@ZelenkoZev) concluded correctly before nearly everyone else did.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - “Not everyone got the same thing.” In an interview with Mel K, Dr. Zelenko said, “Some of the lots were 5,000% more lethal than others — or think of it as 50x. So, let’s say one vial killed one person. Another vial killed 50 people.” “If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be a clear correlation that you’re being poisoned, and no one would take it,” Dr. Zelenko concluded. Thus, the answer to why some people took the shot and turned out okay is because “not everyone got the same thing.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the severe damage caused by multiple doses of a certain substance, suggesting that taking it once is enough. They mention leaked documents from Pfizer and Moderna, revealing different lot numbers and formulations. The FDA's role is to ensure uniformity and safety across the country, but the speaker claims that different concentrations and ingredients were used, resulting in varying effects. Some lots were found to be 5000% more lethal than others. The speaker suggests that this variation was intentional to prevent clear correlation and discourage people from realizing they were being poisoned.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The damage was quite severe. It seems like dose related. Like, the more shots you took, the more damage there is to your immune system. So if you did it once, don't do it again. By the way, we knew through hacked, Pfizer and Moderna documents that the lot numbers were all different, incontinence. In other words, right? One of the jobs of the FDA is to ensure that someone in one part of the country is getting the same thing as someone in another part of the country. Meaning the substance is uniform and everyone's getting the same thing. And it should be something that has been medically necessary works and and safe. Right? But what they have done is create a whole series of different, formulations, different concentrations, different ingredients. And so not everyone got the same. Right. But why would they do that? Yeah. I'll tell you why in a minute. But some of the lots were, of 5000% more lethal than others, or think of it as 50 x. So let's say 1 vial killed 1 person. Another vial killed 50 people. That's in terms of lethality. Why? If everyone would have gotten the same thing, it would be clear and a clear correlation that you're being poisoned and no one would take it. But the most common question I got was, well, I know these people and they're okay. And the answer is yeah, because not everyone got the same thing.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Zelenko’s bold claim was confirmed in March 2023, when a study performed by Schmeling and colleagues found that 4.2% of the batches accounted for a staggering 71% of adverse events.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Don’t take health advice from eugenicists. During a speech at the ReAwaken America tour, Dr. Zelenko broke down why you shouldn’t trust Bill Gates. In 2015, Bill Gates said the population needed to be reduced by 10 to 15 percent. In 2020, he said, 7 billion people must be vaccinated. So, Dr. Zelenko proposed this question: “Why would I take a vaccine for my health which is financed and produced by someone who wants to decrease the world population?” And if you asked yourself that question and realized you shouldn’t get vaccinated, you probably made the best healthcare decision of your life.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates, in a 2015 speech, suggested that the world population should be reduced by 10% to 15% due to global warming, using vaccines as a means to achieve this. In 2020, Gates called for the vaccination of the entire population of 7 billion people. The question raised is why one should take a vaccine for their health when it is funded and created by someone who aims to decrease the world population.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill Gates 2015 everyone knows this spoke that the world population needs to be reduced by 10% to 15% because of global warming through the reduction of the world population through the use of vaccines. Next. In 2020, the same Gates said 7,000,000,000 people must be vaccinated. So here's my question. It's a rhetorical question. Why would I take a vaccine for my health, which is financed and produced by someone who wants to decrease the world population.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - “The flu shot is no longer really necessary at best.” In an interview with Dr. Bryan Ardis, Dr. Zelenko said you’re better off taking EGCG, NAC, Zinc, Vitamin C, and Vitamin D than ever taking the yearly flu shot. “If you get enough zinc into your cell, you’ll be protected from single-stranded RNA viruses,” he said. This includes all strains of COVID and the flu. That formula became known as Z-DTOX, and another formula, Z-Flu with elderberry, became Dr. Zelenko’s go-to recommendation for influenza.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Taking the vaccine increases the risk of blood clots, but N Acetylcysteine (NAC) can prevent them and boost antioxidant levels. Zinc ionophores protect against single-stranded RNA viruses, including all strains of COVID-19. The flu shot is not very effective, with only a 38% success rate, and alternative options like quercetin and EGCG (a green tea extract) are more powerful. Zinc nanoparticles and vitamin D3 are crucial for immune response, while vitamin C supports the immune system. These over-the-counter options are affordable and accessible to everyone.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anyone who fortunately took the vaccine is at a much higher risk for blood clots. So there's over the counter, substance called N Acetylcysteine, or NAC. And it's a powerful substance that prevents blood clots, inhibit sulfide bonds, whatever. But it it it prevents blood clots. It's also It makes glutathione, which is a very powerful antioxidant. And and when human cells are attacked, they get what's called oxidative stress. So it's a like, a extra layer of protection, against assault. So that's that's for people that have been vaccinated or have high risk for blood clots, then I recommend a Zinc ionophore. In other words, if you get enough zinc into your cell, you'll be protected from single stranded RNA viruses. What are single stranded RNA viruses? All the strains of COVID. I'm gonna say it again. All the strains of COVID. So I don't care which variant it is. All variants are treated the same way by me. It also inhibits, influenza virus. I'm sure the pharmaceutical industry is very happy that I'm, basically disseminating disseminating information that the flu shot is no longer Not really necessary at best. It works around 38% a year. And even with the flu shot from 2015 to 2020, each year, we had 40,000,000 cases of the flu in America, and around 40,000 dead, half of which were kids. So the influenza shot and the treatment approaches that we have aren't very good. No. They're not. Out that Trusted zinc. Yeah. But the zinc you need to get zinc in the right place. So you need a zinc ionic. Yes. And those are the over the counter options that you have, quercetin, So bioflavonoid derivative of onions and apple peels for the cancer. And then there's another one called EGCG, which is even more powerful. EGCG. It's a green tea extract. The point is, there's peer reviewed papers in the on the NIH, or that all document that these substances are very powerful, zinc nanoparticles. Then obviously you need zinc. Vitamin D3 is absolutely essential, and you should have levels between 50 and 70. Because all the data shows, in reviewed papers, that people have high normal levels of vitamin d, They're virtually assured not to get admitted in the intensive care units. In other words, your immune response is upregulated, it's very robust, and it protects you and helps you overcome, any infection or most infections. And vitamin c. Vitamin c is an important cofactor in many processes. It's good for your immune system. And so it it those substances, which are all available over the counter. They're affordable. Should be within grasp of every single

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In January 2023, a study by Christiano Argano and colleagues found that taking vitamin D alone reduced the risk of death and ICU admission from COVID-19 infection. Specifically, the chances of death dropped by about 51%, and the risk of ICU admission decreased by about 72%.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And, in March 2022, the CDC estimated that the seasonal flu had a paltry efficacy of only 16%.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 Masks never worked and were harmful. Shortly after a legal ruling did away with mask mandates on airplanes, Dr. Zelenko had this to say: “It [masks] never worked, because the size of the holes in the typical mask that was being used was 0.4 microns. The size of the COVID-19 viral particle is 0.1 microns. So it just passed through the mask, in most cases. It never served any medical purpose. It served the purpose of dehumanizing and destroying the psychology of people.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Zelenko expresses gratitude for the support he has received. He believes that mask mandates have caused fear, isolation, and dehumanization, as they are ineffective against COVID-19 due to the size of the viral particles. He suggests that the purpose of masks was to psychologically harm people and hinder social development, particularly in autistic children. Dr. Zelenko claims that there are evil forces seeking to control and genetically modify humanity. While he acknowledges the positive aspect of mask mandates being lifted, he emphasizes the need to hold those responsible accountable. He urges the fight against oppression and the pursuit of a world filled with true knowledge and God's blessings.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Hi. This is doctor Zelenko. First of all, I wanna thank everyone for their prayers and positive energy. It really, really helps me. So thank you. Regarding the dropping of the mask mandates, so the world has been traumatized, and a mass psychosis has been induced through fear, isolation from people we love, and dehumanization, by wearing being forced to wear a face diaper. It never worked because the size of the holes in the typical mask It was being used as 0.4 microns. The size of the COVID nineteen, virone, the viral particle is 0 point One micron. So it just passed through the mask in most cases. It never served any medical Purpose it served the purpose of dehumanizing and destroying the psychology of people. And especially we'll see in the upcoming years a lot of autistic or Asperger's children because they didn't learn, how to assess facial expressions. And that's how they learn how to socialize in society. So we've been traumatized by Really evil forces of evil that have, are attempting to limit the world population, enslave whoever's left, and to genetically modify, the the human being. That's their stated goals. And so, yeah, of course, it's a good thing that People are not being forced and coerced, into, wearing something that doesn't work, and is destroying them. But we need to bring to justice the animals, The depraved, pagans, what we call the new world order, is nothing more than a, rebranding of the oldest world order of idolatry, idol worship, paganism, and child sacrifice, that is the enemy. And so I'm glad that at least one aspect of the tyranny has been, shut down, but we're far from victory. And and we should use this as a momentum and as a, motivation to continue the war against austerity and so that we ultimately could live in a world that is filled with the true narrative, filled with the knowledge of God as the waters cover the seas. God bless you, and thank you.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In February 2023, The New York Times shocked the world with this headline: “The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 2023, a study by Kisienlinski and colleagues found a worrying health concern associated with chronic carbon dioxide exposure and mask-wearing.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - The COVID shot damages the immune system. “Your innate immune system is getting shot,” Dr. Zelenko told Clay Clark in a past interview. Additionally, Dr. Zelenko outlined a host of other negative effects from the shots: • Cancers • Auto-immune diseases • Opportunistic infections • Blood clots • Heart attacks • Strokes • Miscarriages • Ovarian and testicular dysfunction • Decreased fertility

Video Transcript AI Summary
People who have received the shots are experiencing immune deficiency problems. It's not HIV-induced AIDS, but rather a result of the shot damaging their immune system. This leads to a spike in cancers, autoimmune diseases, opportunistic infections, blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis, miscarriages, ovarian and testicular dysfunction, likely infertility, and antibody-dependent enhancement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Am I am I way off to to think that people that have received the shots are having massive immune deficiency problems? What what how would you describe that? Speaker 1: No. You got it right. They're gonna they have AIDS, but it's not HIV induced AIDS, not to provide HIV. HIV, yeah, damages your your CD 4 cells and other cells, weakens your immune system, and so that's what the syndrome called AIDS. There are other things that damage your immune system, and by taking a shot that damages your natural killer cells, damages your tumor suppressor Genes, what's what's happening is your innate immune system is getting shot, and and so that's why there's a huge spike in cancers, a huge spike in Autoimmune diseases, opportunistic infections, not to mention, blood clots, Heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis, miscarriages, ovarian and testicular dysfunction, Most likely infertility and antibody dependent enhancement, and that's all immune induced. Yeah. You better believe that this is

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Now that bad discovery after bad discovery has come out against the COVID-19 shots, it’s looking like Dr. “Zev” Zelenko was right about all of this.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Zelenko’s legacy will live on forever. The good doctor is remembered by his wife and eight kids, his patients, and the people who fell in love with his message. Dr. Zelenko saved thousands of people directly with his world-famous Zelenko protocol. But he saved hundreds of thousands more by broadcasting his insights to the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko suggests initiating early treatment for moderate to high-risk COVID-19 patients in the outpatient setting, reporting positive results. He mentions the FDA approval of Hydroxychloroquine for various conditions and questions why it was blocked. He then discusses his search for an alternative, finding Quercetin and vitamin C as a substitute for delivering zinc into cells. Dr. Zelenko emphasizes the importance of faith and freedom, advocating for civil disobedience and resistance against potential government overreach. He concludes by highlighting the need for a mature faith in God to overcome fear and uncertainty.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, President Trump. My name is doctor, Vladimir Zelenko. And I'm a board certified family practitioner in Orange County, New York. What I'm suggesting, which has not been yet Just that that's why I'm making this video is that we should initiate treatment in moderate to high risk patients And in the early stages of the infection in the outpatient setting, I'm seeing tremendous positive results. I have not sent, any patient to the hospital yet even though I've treated hundreds already with infection. Speaker 1: Now Hydroxychloroquine has been FDA approved for 65 years for the treatment of Malaria or malaria prophylaxis, the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and lupus, We give it to pregnant women. We give it to nursing mothers. We give it to children. Some people live at 400 milligrams a day For there for 50 years on it. WHO considers it one of the most essential medications. I call that the World Homicide Organization And the and the and the United States stockpiles Hydroxychloroquine. It's considered one of the safest medications in the world. So why was Paloma blocked? When the president motive to address the court when I I saw myself as she got in front of him on the microphone and contradicted the president of the United States, Which is interesting because in 2005, there was a CDC paper Published by CDC. That said that Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine as anti SARS or operators, on the being considered a vaccine. And all of a sudden, Governor Cuomo issued a executive order that only in the context of COVID nineteen, Pharmacists cannot dispense this medication, and my patients started dying again. Can you imagine? And So, you know, the marines have a saying, improvise, adapt, overcome. So what do you you know, you don't you go to war with the army you have, not the army you wish you have. So they took away hydroxychloroquine, so I needed to find another Subsidy that would deliver zinc into the cell. So on the NIH server, of all places, I, I'm looking, and I find a substance called Quercetin together with vitamin c that does the same thing as hydroxychloroquine. Now to be honest, I didn't know what Quercetin was. So I Google it, And I see it's a derivative of onions and apple peels, but more importantly, it's over the counter. And so I, like, leaned back, and I said, oh my god. I I just found the cure to Kirindy. Three and a half years ago, I I was diagnosed with pulmonary artery sarcoma, Which is the deadliest cancer in the world. It's only around 10 cases a year, all found at autopsy. When someone is at State in their life. They don't care about money. They don't care about power. They don't care about fame. You have value structure changes and you start to Focus and concentrate on what's really important in life. Family, country, humanity, Compassion, kindness. I have 8 children, and I want to leave the world a little bit better And safer for them and for your children and for all of our children. You know, what's the difference if I live 20 years, 50 years, a 100 years? In relation to the Internet, it's all insignificant. But the beauty of finite existence is that we have consciousness and we have free choice. And God gives us the ability to make certain choices so that we can develop a relationship with the eternal, with the intent. This is a Oregon's god. God conscious. And that's why all totalitarian, psychopaths, first thing they wanna do is remove or suppress religion or houses of worship. And the reason is simple. I bow down to God. I don't bow down to them. The freedom of our children is dependent on what we do right now. Speaker 0: So here's the solution. Speaker 1: Civil disobedience. Just say no. Just resist. No one no one at this point He's holding it down and putting a needle into your arm. And if they try, we have 450,000,000 guns in the hands of In the hands of law abiding citizens, which It's a right that the founders I believe the constitution is a divinely inspired document, And the 2nd amendment is not to protect me from you, but to protect us from a tyrannical government. Should have the resolve, the stamina, the courage and the ability to deal with the uncertainty and the fear, Which only comes through a mature faith in our creator because anxiety lives where God consciousness is absent, so we have to fill ourselves with the spirit of God and use that and rely on him. Happy birthday. He just made all of us. It's a dynamic process of recreation and rely on him, and that will give us the fortitude to be the David that Slays this

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Zelenko is not done helping people. http://zstacklife.com is still going strong. There, you can find world-class nutraceuticals designed by the good doctor himself. From COVID and flu to detox to sleep to kids’ health, Dr. Zelenko’s formulas are there when you need them.

Vladimir Zelenko MD Vladimir Zelenko MD zstacklife.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

To see everything Dr. Zelenko has to offer, visit http://zstacklife.com. The revenue generated from sales directly supports Dr. Zelenko’s family.

Vladimir Zelenko MD Vladimir Zelenko MD zstacklife.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And before you go, be sure to follow Dr. Zelenko's account on Twitter (X), which is now managed by his good friend @DschlopesIsBack. Follow @ZelenkoZev.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DschlopesIsBack @ZelenkoZev And while you're here, check out these stories from @VigilantNews: Donald Trump unleashes on ‘corrupt’ World Health Organization in viral truth social video. https://vigilantnews.com/post/trump-unleashes-on-corrupt-world-health-organization-in-viral-truth-social-video

Trump Unleashes on ‘Corrupt’ World Health Organization in Viral Truth Social Video “[WHO] deserves to be completely abolished and replaced,” Trump declared in a video statement Tuesday. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DschlopesIsBack @ZelenkoZev @VigilantNews Perverse brainwashing techniques were thoroughly studied to get you jabbed. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-psychological-playbook-brainwashing-techniques-to-increase-vaccine-uptake

The Psychological Playbook: Brainwashing Techniques to Increase “Vaccine” Uptake How truly evil and psychopathic the COVID-19 propaganda and the psychological warfare on the population was. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. wins the day with an epic response to being called a 'conspiracy theorist.' https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-wins-the-day-responds-to-c-span-caller-who-labels-him-a-conspiracy-theorist-with-intellect-tact-and-grace

RFK Jr. Wins the Day: Responds to C-Span Caller Who Labels Him a 'Conspiracy Theorist' with Intellect, Tact and Grace Robert Kennedy Jr. found himself in the hot seat, answering questions from a caller named Sharon, who accused him of being a conspiracy theorist. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - First-ever published spike detox protocol details how you can get better after the COVID shots. https://vigilantnews.com/post/first-ever-spike-detox-protocol-appears-in-medical-journal-heres-how-you-can-get-better

First-Ever Spike Detox Protocol Appears in US Medical Journal: Here’s How You Can Get Better "Patients indeed are getting better on this approach," says renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials. There was a “bait-and-switch.” https://vigilantnews.com/post/pfizer-biontechs-bait-and-switch

Pfizer/BioNTech's "Bait-and-Switch" Sonia Elijah's interview with Joshua Guetzkow, PhD vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Fenbendazole is emerging as a “miracle drug” for cancer, and it’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-overlooked-miracle-drug-for-cancer-why-big-pharma-fears-fenbendazole

The Overlooked Miracle Drug for Cancer? Why Big Pharma Fears Fenbendazole Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for making it all the way to the end! For more untold stories the media ignored, make sure you're following Vigilant News. --> @VigilantNews https://t.co/44lqkAv6Bb

VigilantFox
Posted - October 31, 2023 at 3:58 PM
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 6:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fenbendazole, a low-cost and safe drug, has shown promising anti-cancer properties. However, its lack of profitability discourages clinical trials. This hinders access to a potentially effective treatment. Cancer researcher @MakisMD highlights its 12 proven mechanisms. @JoeRogan criticizes the suppression of such information. Additionally, insights suggest that popular sleep medication could treat vaccine-induced "turbo cancers." Young doctors and fitness enthusiasts face risks, while Ivermectin demonstrates 15 anti-cancer mechanisms. The potential of these overlooked treatments deserves attention.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Overlooked Miracle Drug for Cancer? Why Big Pharma Fears Fenbendazole "Fenbendazole has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms in vitro and in vivo," wrote cancer researcher Dr. @MakisMD. "So why are there no Fenbendazole clinical trials for cancer? The answer seems rather obvious: it’s very cheap, it’s safe, and it seems to be very effective. Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter." "What an enemy of the people," @JoeRogan responded. "They're preventing information and preventing people from using things that save them."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fenbezodizole, a potential miracle drug for cancer, has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms of action. It is speculated that big pharma fears it due to its low cost. The speaker hopes that Flint is aware of this and examines it. There has been some reaction to this discovery, and it is revealed that a similar drug in the same family, menbendazole, has already been approved by the FDA and is in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. The lack of clinical trials for Fenbezodizole is attributed to its low cost, safety, and effectiveness. Big pharma's lack of interest in it is seen as an obstacle to people accessing potentially life-saving treatments. The speaker suggests that society is designed to make people sick, allowing big pharma to profit from their remedies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Overlook miracle drug for cancer, why big pharma fears Fenbezodizole. Fenbezodizole. At least 12 anti cancer mechanisms of action, 9 research papers reviewed. So I think this stuff is supposed to be low cost And this is some of the speculation, the conspiracy theory about, like, why people are afraid of it. Speaker 1: Well, I hope that I hope that Flint is aware of this, and that it helps him to Speaker 0: Yeah. That's why I brought it up. Speaker 1: From his counsel. That's that's That's that's very good to know. I hope Speaker 0: he's interested in even just examining it. Speaker 1: Oh, I think it will be. I hope so. So There's been some reaction to this. Speaker 0: I just found out about this a couple of days ago. Speaker 1: Yeah. The Speaker 0: so these research papers fend go stop it right there. Has at least 12 proven anticancer mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. Mhmm. It disrupts, microtubule polymerization. Yeah. Major mechanism induces cell cycle, whatever that means, arrest, blocks glucose transport and impairs glucose utilization by cancer cells, increases p 3 p 53 tumor suppressor levels, inhibits, inhibits cancer cell viability, inhibits cancer cell migration invasion, induces, induces autography, induces they're trying to get me with all these words. K Prioptosis and necrosis, induces differentiation and sustenance. Senescence senescence inhibits tuner angiogenesis, reduces colony form formation and inhibits stemness in cancer cells, inhibits drug resistance and sensitizes cells to conventional chemo as well as radiation therapy. Interesting. And they're saying cells to chemotherapy. Speaker 1: A very similar drug in the same family is already been approved by the FDA. Speaker 0: And that is, menbendazole, and it is in several, several clinical trials right now for brain cancers and colon cancers. So why are no Fenbendazole clinical trials for cancer? The answer seems rather obvious rather obvious. It's very cheap, it's safe, and it seems to be effective. Yeah. Very effective. Exactly. Interesting. Speaker 2: Big pharma big pharma don't see a margin in it. Speaker 0: I want I mean, if that, who knows? But if that is the case, I mean, what an enemy of the people. They're preventing information and preventing people Using things. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, we've we've created a society that seems to be designed to make us sick, and then Big Pharma steps in with so called remedies for it, which happen to make some people a lot of money.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks, @JoeRogan, for sharing this important @VigilantNews article on the show. You can read it in its entirety here: https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-overlooked-miracle-drug-for-cancer-why-big-pharma-fears-fenbendazole

The Overlooked Miracle Drug for Cancer? Why Big Pharma Fears Fenbendazole Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@joerogan @VigilantNews More insights from cancer researcher @MakisMD: C19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancers” May Be Treatable By Popular Sleep Medication https://vigilantnews.com/post/oncologist-c19-vaccine-induced-turbo-cancers-may-be-treatable-by-popular-sleep-medication

Oncologist: C19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancers” May Be Treatable By Popular Sleep Medication “Melatonin has been shown to treat breast, colon, lung, hepatobiliary, ovarian and prostate cancers - which just happen to also be the same cancers that show up after Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination but in Stage 4 Turbo variety,” says Dr. William Makis. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@joerogan @VigilantNews @MakisMD “Turbo cancers” are decimating young doctors. https://vigilantnews.com/post/turbo-cancers-are-decimating-young-doctors-54-cases-examined

“Turbo Cancers” Are Decimating Young Doctors: 54 Cases Examined Out of 180 Canadian doctors who have died unexpectedly since COVID-19 vaccines rolled out in Canada, 42 had cancer. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@joerogan @VigilantNews @MakisMD Fitness enthusiasts, not just athletes, are dying suddenly. https://vigilantnews.com/post/fitness-enthusiasts-are-dying-suddenly-16-sudden-deaths-examined

Fitness enthusiasts are dying suddenly - 16 sudden deaths examined Personal trainers, fitness instructors & influencers, jiu-jitsu, crossfit, gym goers - high risk of sudden death! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@joerogan @VigilantNews @MakisMD Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com
VigilantFox
Posted - October 31, 2023 at 3:58 PM
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 6:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A cancer researcher highlights the potential of Fenbendazole as a cheap and effective anti-cancer drug, suggesting that its lack of clinical trials is due to its low profitability. @JoeRogan criticizes the pharmaceutical industry for hindering access to such treatments. @kent4jmj adds that Ivermectin may also be beneficial for blood-related issues.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Overlooked Miracle Drug for Cancer? Why Big Pharma Fears Fenbendazole "Fenbendazole has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms in vitro and in vivo," wrote cancer researcher Dr. @MakisMD. "So why are there no Fenbendazole clinical trials for cancer? The answer seems rather obvious: it’s very cheap, it’s safe, and it seems to be very effective. Fenbendazole is not going to make anyone rich, and in cancer treatments, that is a non-starter." "What an enemy of the people," @JoeRogan responded. "They're preventing information and preventing people from using things that save them."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fenbezodizole, a potential miracle drug for cancer, has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms of action. It is speculated that big pharma fears this drug due to its low cost. There is hope that Flint, who is mentioned in the conversation, will be interested in examining it. The drug disrupts microtubule polymerization, induces cell cycle arrest, blocks glucose transport, increases tumor suppressor levels, inhibits cancer cell viability and migration, induces autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis, and inhibits angiogenesis and drug resistance. A similar drug, menbendazole, is already approved by the FDA and in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. The lack of clinical trials for Fenbezodizole may be due to its low cost and effectiveness. Big pharma's lack of interest in it is seen as preventing people from accessing potentially beneficial treatments. The conversation also touches on the idea that society is designed to make people sick, with big pharma profiting from remedies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Overlook miracle drug for cancer, why big pharma fears Fenbezodizole. Fenbezodizole. At least 12 anti cancer mechanisms of action, 9 research papers reviewed. So I think this stuff is supposed to be low cost And this is some of the speculation, the conspiracy theory about, like, why people are afraid of it. Speaker 1: Well, I hope that I hope that Flint is aware of this, and that it helps him to Speaker 0: Yeah. That's why I brought it up. Speaker 1: From his counsel. That's that's That's that's very good to know. I hope Speaker 0: he's interested in even just examining it. Speaker 1: Oh, I think it will be. I hope so. So There's been some reaction to this. Speaker 0: I just found out about this a couple of days ago. Speaker 1: Yeah. The Speaker 0: so these research papers fend go stop it right there. Has at least 12 proven anticancer mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. Mhmm. It disrupts, microtubule polymerization. Yeah. Major mechanism induces cell cycle, whatever that means, arrest, blocks glucose transport and impairs glucose utilization by cancer cells, increases p 3 p 53 tumor suppressor levels, inhibits, inhibits cancer cell viability, inhibits cancer cell migration invasion, induces, induces autography, induces they're trying to get me with all these words. K Prioptosis and necrosis, induces differentiation and sustenance. Senescence senescence inhibits tuner angiogenesis, reduces colony form formation and inhibits stemness in cancer cells, inhibits drug resistance and sensitizes cells to conventional chemo as well as radiation therapy. Interesting. And they're saying cells to chemotherapy. Speaker 1: A very similar drug in the same family is already been approved by the FDA. Speaker 0: And that is, menbendazole, and it is in several, several clinical trials right now for brain cancers and colon cancers. So why are no Fenbendazole clinical trials for cancer? The answer seems rather obvious rather obvious. It's very cheap, it's safe, and it seems to be effective. Yeah. Very effective. Exactly. Interesting. Speaker 2: Big pharma big pharma don't see a margin in it. Speaker 0: I want I mean, if that, who knows? But if that is the case, I mean, what an enemy of the people. They're preventing information and preventing people Using things. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, we've we've created a society that seems to be designed to make us sick, and then Big Pharma steps in with so called remedies for it, which happen to make some people a lot of money.

@kent4jmj - Kent

@VigilantFox @MakisMD Fenbendazole for organs. Ivermectin for blood.

VigilantFox
Posted - November 2, 2023 at 4:53 PM
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 5:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, a versatile medication, offers numerous benefits. It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, reduces inflammation, improves the gut microbiome, aids athletic performance, and possesses anti-cancer properties. Moreover, it revolutionized veterinary medicine and is safe and affordable. In comparison, Molnupiravir falls short in COVID-19 treatment. Ivermectin shows a 62% improvement with 99 studies and costs $1 per pill, while Molnupiravir only shows a 15% improvement with 34 studies and costs $707 per pill. Ivermectin's potential has been undermined due to its threat to the lucrative vaccine industry. Its effectiveness had to be discredited to protect the $200 billion vaccine enterprise.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving #1 - It inhibits flu and RSV viral replication, which is why it’s included in the FLCCC flu and RSV protocols. #2 - It reduces inflammation throughout the body. #3 - Improves the gastrointestinal microbiome by boosting levels of the probiotic Bifidobacterium. #4 - It revolutionized veterinary medicine and arguably stabilized the world’s food supply. #5 - May help with athletic and sports performance by boosting cellular energy output in the heart. #6 - It has profound anti-cancer properties. Best of all, Ivermectin is incredibly safe and cheap. When you compare Molnupiravir and Ivermectin head-to-head in the context of COVID-19, you can see what a disgraceful, overpriced stink-bomb Molnupiravir actually is: Ivermectin: 62% improvement, 99 studies, $1 per pill Merck’s Show Pony: 15% improvement, 34 studies, $707 per pill This information was gathered from an article written by @MDMichaelTurner (give him a follow). Read the full in-depth article in the comment below:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

ARTICLE: 6 Secrets of Ivermectin - The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Related Articles: Ivermectin: The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-untold-story-of-a-miracle-drug-4952578?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever https://vigilantnews.com/post/lessons-from-ivermectin-why-stockpiling-life-saving-drugs-is-more-important-than-ever

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever Ivermectin, a Nobel-Prize-winning human medicine, is often touted as "one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era." Leading doctors believe this drug could have potentially curbed the pandemic at its outset. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action. https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a CNN segment where they portrayed him as taking horse medication. He believes this is evidence of a conspiracy, as the medication in question, Ivermectin, is commonly used in humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy. He suggests that Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were discredited to protect the vaccine industry, as federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if there are existing effective medications. Acknowledging the effectiveness of these medications would have undermined the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, Because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin: The Truth - by legendary filmmaker Mikki Willis (@Plandemic3Movie). https://t.co/fKvLzszaIw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. While some claim it is a safe and effective medicine, others argue that it is a horse dewormer with no clinical evidence of its efficacy. The video highlights the smear campaign against Ivermectin and suggests that powerful forces, including pharmaceutical companies, may be suppressing its use. It also mentions the positive results seen in countries like India and Peru where Ivermectin was used as part of a multi-drug approach. The video raises concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the media and the manipulation of clinical studies. Overall, it presents Ivermectin as a potentially effective treatment that has been unfairly maligned.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of all the harmful misinformation spread over the past couple of years, one of the most disturbing false narratives was targeted at the Nobel Prize winning human medicine, Ivermectin. What you're about to see will reveal the motive behind the smear campaign against one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era. A medicine that, according to the numerous top scientists I've interviewed this year, could have ended the pandemic before it began. Speaker 1: So things are clearly bad, but they're being made even worse by people who have refused to take the vaccine and instead are swallowing horse paste. Speaker 2: Horse dewormer. There's no clinical evidence that indicates that this works. Speaker 3: It goes beyond that. We actually know that It doesn't work. Speaker 4: Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID, but could put you in a coma. Speaker 2: It can kill you. Speaker 4: It can kill you. Speaker 5: Turns out I got COVID. So we immediately threw the kitchen sink at it. All kinds of meds, monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin. Speaker 6: One of those drugs he mentioned, Ivermectin, is something more often used to deworm horses. Speaker 7: We should Speaker 5: talk about that. That bothered you. It should bother you too. They're lying at your network about people taking human drugs versus drugs for the veterinary. Speaker 6: Calling it a horse to wormer is not a flattering thing. Speaker 8: I get that. Speaker 5: It's a lie. Speaker 8: They they shouldn't have said Speaker 9: Why did they Speaker 5: do that? I don't know. You're the medical guy over there. Speaker 6: Ivermectin can be a very effective medication. Speaker 8: You are more likely to die from taking Tylenol than Ivermectin, yet the FDA calls this a dangerous Horse deworming medicine. Speaker 10: What initially led this was an FDA Twitter account that use the term y'all to express denigration of Ivermectin as a horse drug. I have horses. The truth is that the dose that's used for horses by body weight is the same dose that's recommended for humans, But it's formulated and manufactured to a quality standard that's very different. Speaker 6: Lots of medicines are used in both animals and humans. So it's not a sufficient argument Somebody to say, it's a horse dewormer. Speaker 11: Yesterday, the CDC put out a national advisory on this warning the whole country against taking this Drug Ivermectin formulated for horses and cows and sheep. Speaker 12: With that, memo fired to every doctor, then Suddenly, me and all my early treatment colleagues around the country, we were faced with problems like we'd never had before. Speaker 4: I work as an emergency room doctor. And And not only an emergency room doctor, I teach advanced trauma life support, a course to other doctors that wanna work in the emergency room on how to stabilize patients. We were being told there's nothing you can do. Just wait for Fauci and the FDA to acknowledge a vaccine that they were gonna create, and there's no treatment, they said. Why would you want to decrease access to quality, life saving, measures for people who are fighting a worldwide pandemic? Speaker 9: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, Safe and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 12: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, Collectively, we're some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 9: As we sit here today, I'm the most published person in my field in history. But when COVID nineteen hit, my clinical and academic world was turned upside down. Speaker 13: Twitter, in its wisdom, has decided to suspend the account of doctor Robert Malone. Now Robert Malone happens to be the inventor of the mRNA technology of making vaccines. His Twitter account has been suspended because he was allegedly spreading Misinformation on COVID nineteen vaccines. Let that sink in. Speaker 12: We have made contributions to our field for decades. So when we find ourselves, like, dismissed, you know, and they'll do that to anyone. You're suddenly fringe. Speaker 2: Touted as a miracle prevention and cure by far right commentators and anti vaxxers. Speaker 10: I'm not, although I've been characterized as a Right wing Proud Boy, this is a bipartisan issue, and the physicians represented here are truly a bipartisan group. Speaker 12: Our lives started going sideways professionally. Right. Paul started getting numerous complaints against him that he's never had in his career. Speaker 8: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Die. Speaker 14: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products and related Authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 10: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products, is no longer supportable. Speaker 12: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful Full forces with a lot of money. I mean, public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. Speaker 11: We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 To $102,000,000,000. Pfizer, Speaker 15: BioNTech, and Moderna. Do you know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. Speaker 12: You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications That would be significantly affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 16: This is an incredibly cheap drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India. Remarkably low cost. Speaker 14: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective Treatment against COVID nineteen and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, But now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 10: Folks need to understand that just because there is an article out there that asserts that something is false recognize that those are paid. Speaker 7: Every major media outlet in the United States shares at least 1 board member with at least 1 drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you. These board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take them over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of Programming that network is gonna air. They can't be honest and objective about big pharma because big pharma pays their bills. Speaker 17: In fact, one analysis claimed 9 out of the top 10 drugmakers spent more on marketing than they did on research. Speaker 18: CNN tonight, Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Speaker 0: Brought to Speaker 8: you by Pfizer. Speaker 18: Brought to you by Fiserv Royal Wedding is brought to you by brought to you by Fiserv. Fiserv. Speaker 19: If asked the question, Did you know how much influence your former employer had on big media and so on? I have no idea. It is clear that the pharmaceutical industry has has a great deal of sway on what goes on. If you can shape the message, then you can shape the world, and that's what they've done. Speaker 13: When was Speaker 9: the last time you turned on the news and ever got an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Speaker 12: A group of South African doctors has launched an urgent court Cajun. They are seeking easier access to Ivermectin. Speaker 20: Globally, at least 5 countries want to use Ivermectin to treat COVID nineteen, Including India and Argentina. There are numerous concrete tests in medical journals around the world that Ivermectin Does work. Speaker 9: The earliest reports we had, one of them we had in Peru, where they got into a good mode of using multidrug Treatment with an Ivermectin based approach that they were crushing their curves. Speaker 2: And the president of the Tokyo Medical Association announced to all doctors during a summer surge That they should use Ivermectin in the treatment. Within weeks, the hospitalization rates reported out of Japan Were lower than at any other time in the pandemic. Speaker 9: The real proof positive came when COVID-nineteen really hit hard in Mexico City. They finally, after lots of struggle, came with an Ivermectin based multi drug approach, and literally cleared out the hospitals. And then we had reports all the way through that various states in India. Speaker 21: In India, the government has been widely promoting the use of Ivermectin. State leaders have just declared that Uttar Pradesh is now officially COVID free. A region with nearly as many people as the entire United States is totally COVID free. Speaker 12: The miracle success of Uttar Pradesh, not one mention of Ivermectin being used. Speaker 22: In the countries that it has been used, in the countries where the studies are, the results are not good. They are overwhelming. They are well over 90% success rate. Speaker 12: In the Speaker 2: United States, it's a horse dewormer. It's horse based, and only the illiterate, ignorant, and and or unvaccinated use it. Speaker 10: The key paradox Is if you look at the mortality rate in the United States, one of the most highly funded medical care systems in the world, And what we find is the mortality in the United States is among the worst in the world. Speaker 2: If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there's only one way to understand them. They are literally written by pharmaceutical companies. They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines, And they can make things appear that they don't work. Speaker 10: I sit as a nonvoting member of the active committee for drugs with NIH. I've seen the dynamics of what are going on with all those trials, which most of which have failed. Unfortunately, it's imminently possible to manipulate the outcomes of a clinical study. If you want a study to fail, that's dead easy. Speaker 12: Now, their 4th quote unquote negative study of Ivermectin in a major medical journal, and each time is a media frenzy. Speaker 3: There was a systematic review looking at Randomized controlled trials that have been done, and they found that there was no benefit for Ivermectin in reducing mortality, death to COVID nineteen, No reduction in symptoms or duration of symptoms for COVID nineteen, so it does not work. Speaker 19: People need to understand that academics Have been threatened with losing their position and threatened with getting no further research grants If they speak out against the narrative, guess why that is? 2 thirds of the world's non commercial biological research is funded by just 3 bodies. The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, And specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Speaker 10: There's this pattern that is consistent with A concerted effort to mislead the public by withholding information using modern technology, media, censorship, really, let's call it what it is, thought control. Speaker 23: He could actually control, Exactly what people think. And that is the that is our job. Yeah. Speaker 12: Whenever you have clear cut evidence that a drug works, You have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people know so that they could have access. Speaker 6: What are you telling people is the Is the optimal profile. Speaker 24: I want a pill, orally administered, single pill Given for 7 to 10 days, little drug drug interaction and low toxicity. Give me that, and I'll be really happy. Speaker 21: Ivermectin has been used safely for decades, has no known drug interactions, won a Nobel Prize for its success treating humans, And is on the WHO's list of the safest, most effective medicines in the entire world. Speaker 10: And it showed an 86% effectiveness to Prevent people from contracting COVID. Speaker 6: Ivermectin has been used over 4,000,000,000 times and it's used for a wide variety of treatments. Ivermectin has been shown Speaker 21: known to possess different anti inflammation, antiviral, and antitumor properties. Speaker 3: Clinical studies abroad suggest It works. Speaker 13: All the studies show that it does have a positive effect. Speaker 22: That is the thing about Ivermectin. It's not good. It's great. Speaker 12: I have never seen an evidence base This large with 81 controlled trials, 10 years of in vitro studies in the lab against a dozen RNA viruses, All showing that Ivermectin stops replication. It literally is, in my mind, the single greatest public health achievement in our history of affection control in the world.
VigilantFox
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 12:50 AM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 4:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, hailed for its impact on human health and Nobel Prize win, posed a threat to the lucrative vaccine industry worth $200 billion. To comply with the Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute, which prohibits emergency use authorization if an effective existing medication exists, ivermectin had to be discredited. Acknowledging its effectiveness would have jeopardized the vaccine enterprise.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how CNN portrayed them as taking horse medication, specifically Ivermectin, which is actually a medication used more commonly in humans. They mention that Ivermectin has been prescribed to billions of people and even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. The speaker believes that Ivermectin had to be discredited because of a federal law that states emergency use authorization for vaccines cannot be issued if there is an existing medication proven effective against the target illness. They argue that acknowledging the effectiveness of Ivermectin would have jeopardized the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most the to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. Farm. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often in human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: for Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit Ivermectin because, you know, Because there's a federal law the federal law the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue You you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.
VigilantFox
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 4:02 PM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 7:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, hailed as a significant medical breakthrough, threatens the lucrative vaccine industry. The FDA discredited its effectiveness to protect the $200 billion vaccine enterprise. However, studies show its potential in treating cancer and reducing excess deaths. Stockpiling life-saving drugs is crucial, and an overdose on ivermectin is a concern. Watch the documentary "The War on Ivermectin" for more information.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. And its discovery won the Nobel Prize in 2015. But its existence threatened a $200 billion vaccine enterprise. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” RFK Jr. told Joe Rogan earlier this year: “They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA issues emergency use authorization for medical products when there are no approved alternatives. The effectiveness of Ivermectin as a treatment is questioned, as it would have affected the authorization of vaccines. Powerful forces with financial interests oppose Ivermectin, as it threatens global vaccination policies. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna have made significant profits from COVID-19 vaccines. Ivermectin is a cheap and widely available drug, but its safety is disputed by Merck, despite distributing it when it was under patent. It is important to be cautious of articles that may be biased or paid for.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From the FDA, Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the U. S. Speaker 1: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable. Speaker 2: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful forces with a lot of money. I mean, Public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 to $102,000,000,000. Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna. Do you know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications that would affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 3: This is an incredibly cheap Drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India, remarkably low cost. Speaker 0: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against COVID nineteen, and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, but now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 1: Folks need to understand that just because there is an article out there that asserts that something is false, recognize that those are paid.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

More stories on ivermectin from @VigilantNews: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews “Ivermectin Worked!”: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths https://vigilantnews.com/post/ivermectin-worked-peer-reviewed-study-finds-74-reduction-in-excess-deaths/

“Ivermectin Worked!”: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths Let this be another tally mark for when the "conspiracy theorists" got it right all along. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever https://vigilantnews.com/post/lessons-from-ivermectin-why-stockpiling-life-saving-drugs-is-more-important-than-ever/

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever Ivermectin, a Nobel-Prize-winning human medicine, is often touted as "one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era." Leading doctors believe this drug could have potentially curbed the pandemic at its outset. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantNews Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you/

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Watch the full documentary, The War on Ivermectin, in the post below: https://x.com/PierreKory/status/1735410610316144761?s=20

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Was just interviewed by Del Bigtree on The Highwire to premiere Mikki Willis's updated film "The War on Ivermectin" (great title, right?) and promote my book (tinyurl.com/The-War-On-Ive…) Check it out: https://t.co/ecQCUTureQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Rogan announced on social media that he has COVID and mentioned taking Ivermectin as part of his treatment. However, Ivermectin is primarily used as a dewormer for horses and is not proven to be effective against COVID. In fact, it can be dangerous and potentially deadly. The CDC and FDA have issued warnings against using Ivermectin for COVID. Some doctors claim that Ivermectin is effective and have faced backlash for advocating its use. There are allegations that pharmaceutical companies and the media have influenced the narrative against Ivermectin due to financial interests. Studies on Ivermectin have shown mixed results, but some countries have reported success in using it to treat COVID.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, breaking news this evening. Joe O'Rogan announced on social media today that he has COVID. Speaker 1: So we immediately threw the kitchen sink at it. All kinds of meds. Monoclonal antibodies, Ivermectin. Speaker 0: One of those drugs he mentioned, Ivermectin, is something more often used to deworm horses. Speaker 2: So things are clearly bad, but they're being made even worse by people who have refused to take the vaccine and instead are Dead or swallowing Speaker 0: horse dewormer. Speaker 3: Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID, Speaker 4: but could put you in a coma. Speaker 0: It can kill you. Speaker 5: It can kill you. Speaker 6: There's no clinical Evidence that indicates that this works. Speaker 7: It goes beyond that. We actually know that it doesn't work. Speaker 1: We should talk about that. That bothered you. It should bother You too. They're lying at your network about people taking human drugs versus drugs Speaker 0: for the Speaker 1: veterinary. It a horse dewormer is not a flattering thing. I get that. It's a lie. Speaker 0: They they shouldn't have said that. Speaker 3: Why did Speaker 8: they do that? Speaker 1: I don't know. You're the I've got a guy over there. Ivermectin can be a very effective medication. Speaker 5: Touted as a miracle prevention and cure by far Alright commentators and anti vaxxers, Ivermectin is a treatment for lice and Speaker 9: What initially led this was an FDA Twitter account that used the term y'all to express denigration of Ivermectin as a horse drug. The truth is that the dose that's used for horses by body weight is the same dose that's recommended for humans, but it's formulated and manufactured to a quality Standard is very different. Speaker 4: The CDC put out a national advisory on this warning the whole country against taking this drug Ivermectin formulated for horses and cows and sheep. Speaker 8: With that, memo fired to every doctor, then suddenly me and all my early treatment colleagues around the country, We were faced with problems like we'd never had before. Speaker 10: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw A doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the The application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 8: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ISU doctors, collectively, were some of the most Highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published Practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 10: As we sit here today, I'm the most published person in my field in history, But when COVID nineteen hit, my clinical and academic world was turned upside down. Speaker 8: That's when our lives started going sideways professionally. Paul started getting numerous complaints against him that he's never had in career? Speaker 11: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people die. Speaker 12: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products and related authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the U. S. Speaker 9: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with Largely experimental products is no longer supportable. Speaker 8: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful forces with a lot of money. I mean, Public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. Speaker 4: We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 to $102,000,000,000. Speaker 13: Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna. You know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. Speaker 8: You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications that would be Significantly affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 14: This is an incredibly cheap Drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India. Remarkably low Cost. Speaker 12: Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against COVID and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, but now they're claiming the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 9: Folks need to understand that just because There is an article out there that asserts that something is false. Recognize that those are paid. Speaker 15: Every major media outlet in the United States shares at least 1 board member with at least 1 drug company. Let me put it in perspective for you. These board members wake up, they go to a meeting at Merck or Pfizer, and then they have their driver take come over to a meeting with NBC to decide what kind of programming that network is gonna air. They can't be honest and objective about big pharma Because big pharma pays their bills. Speaker 16: In fact, one analysis claimed 9 out of the top 10 drugmakers spent more on marketing than they did on Research. Speaker 3: CNN tonight brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. To you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Speaker 1: Brought to you Speaker 3: by Pfizer. Brought to you by Pfizer. Royal Wedding is brought to you by brought to you by by Pfizer. Pfizer. Pfizer. Pfizer. Speaker 14: If asked the question, did you know how much influence your former employer had on big media and so on, I had no idea. It is clear that The pharmaceutical industry has has a great deal of sway on what goes on. If you can shape the message, then you can shape the world, and that's what they've done. Speaker 10: When was the last time you turned on the news and ever got an update about how the rest of the world is handling COVID? Speaker 14: A group of South African doctors has launched an urgent court application. They are seeking easier access to Ivermectin. Speaker 13: Globally, at least 5 countries want to use Ivermectin to treat COVID nineteen, including India and Argentina. There are numerous concrete tests in medical journals around the world that Ivermectin Does work. Speaker 10: The earliest reports we had, one of them we had in Peru, where they got into a good mode of using multidrug treatment with an Ivermectin based approach, that they were crushing Speaker 0: their curves. And the president of the Tokyo Medical Association announced to all doctors during a summer surge that they should use Ivermectin in the treatment. Within weeks, the hospitalization rates reported out of Japan were lower than at any other time in the pandemic. Speaker 10: The real proof positive came when COVID nineteen really hit hard in Mexico City. They finally, After lots of struggle came with an Ivermectin based multidrug approach and literally cleared out the hospitals. And then we had reports all the way through that various states in India. Speaker 17: In India, the government has been widely promoting the use of Ivermectin. State leaders have just declared that Uttar Pradesh is now officially COVID Free. A region with nearly as many people as the entire United States is totally COVID free. Speaker 8: The miracle success of Uttar Pradesh, not one mention of Ivermectin being used. Speaker 13: In the countries that it has been used, in the countries where the studies are, The results are not good. They are overwhelming. They are well over 90% success rate. Speaker 0: In the United States, it's a horse dewormer, it's horse paste, And only the illiterate, ignorant, and and or unvaccinated use it. Speaker 9: The key paradox is if you look at the mortality rate in the United States, one of the most highly funded medical care systems in the world. And what we find is the mortality in the United States is among the worst in the world. Speaker 0: If you look at these innumerable failed policies, there's only one way to understand them. They are literally Written by pharmaceutical companies. They can design trials to fail to disprove the use of cheap medicines and they can make things appear that they don't work. Speaker 9: I sit as a non voting member of the active Committee for Drugs with NIH. I've seen the dynamics of what going on with all those trials, which most of which have failed. Unfortunately, it's eminently possible to manipulate the outcomes of a clinical study. If you wanna study to fail, that's dead easy. Speaker 8: Now, their 4th quote unquote negative study of Ivermectin in a major medical journal. And each time is a media frenzy. Speaker 7: There was a systematic review looking at randomized controlled trials that had been done, And they found that there was no benefit for Ivermectin in reducing mortality, death to COVID nineteen, no reduction in symptoms or duration of symptoms for COVID nineteen, so it does not work. Speaker 14: People need to understand that academics have been threatened with losing their position and Threatened with getting no further research grants if they speak out against the narrative. Guess why that is? Two thirds of the world's noncommercial biological research is funded by just 3 bodies, The Wellcome Trust in the UK, the NIH, and specifically the NIAID under Tony Fauci, And the Phil and Melinda Gates Foundation. Speaker 9: There's this pattern that is consistent with a concerted effort To mislead the public by withholding information using modern technology, media, censorship, Really, let's call it what it is, thought control. Speaker 18: He could actually control, exactly what people think. And that is the that is our Speaker 14: job. Yeah. Speaker 6: Whenever you have clear cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people know so that they could have access. Speaker 1: What are you telling people is the is the optimal profile? Speaker 6: I want a pill, orally administered, Single pill given for 7 to 10 days, little drug drug interaction, and low toxicity. Give me that and I'll be really happy. Speaker 17: Ivermectin has been used safely for decades, has no known drug interactions, won a Nobel Prize for success treating humans and is on the WHO's list of the safest, most effective medicines in the Higher world. Speaker 9: And it showed an 86% effectiveness to prevent people from contracting COVID. Speaker 1: Ivermectin has been used over 4000000000 times and it's used for a wide variety of treatments. Speaker 17: Ivermectin has been shown to possess different anti inflammation, Antiviral and antitumor properties. Speaker 13: That is the thing about Ivermectin. It's not good. It's great. Speaker 5: Breaking news. The FDA lawyer announces that Ivermectin can be prescribed for COVID nineteen. Speaker 8: I have never seen an evidence base this large with 81 controlled trials. 10 years of in vitro studies in the lab against a dozen RNA viruses all showing that Ivermectin stops replication. It literally is, In my mind, the single greatest public health achievement in our history of infection control in the world.
CKellyUAP
Posted - December 16, 2023 at 5:57 AM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 8:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author believes that there was a deliberate effort to discredit and destroy the effectiveness of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. They argue that acknowledging their effectiveness would have jeopardized the lucrative vaccine industry and exposed politicians as frauds.

@CKellyUAP - Craig Kelly

IVERMECTIN : FOLLOW THE MONEY They had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. They didn’t care how many people they killed. Because if they had acknowledged that Ivermectin or HCQ was effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed. And the politicians that wanted to claim glory for "saving everyone" with a free injection would have been exposed as frauds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a group of doctors discuss the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19. Some doctors argue that Ivermectin is a safe and effective drug that has shown miraculous effectiveness in treating the virus. They cite studies and the endorsement of a senior immunologist to support their claims. However, other doctors disagree, stating that the studies are still undergoing peer review and that Ivermectin is not an approved treatment for COVID-19. They argue that the vaccines have emergency use authorization because there are no approved alternatives. The debate centers around the effectiveness and credibility of Ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Before. Speaker 1: So it was the first time in history that we ever saw a doctor who could be prosecuted for using a generic, safe, and effective drug for the application that doctor thought was appropriate. Speaker 0: My group of 5, the core 5 of us ICU doctors, collectively, were some of the most highly published doctors in the history of critical care medicine. Paul Maric is the most published practicing intensivist in the world. Speaker 1: As we sit here today. I'm the most published person in my field in history. Speaker 2: To this because I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've got a listen to our doctors and our scientists. Speaker 3: So Ivermectin is a drug which has been dispensed 3,700,000,000 times. It's changed the face of parasitic diseases on this planet. It's probably the 2nd most important drug ever invented. It is very safe. It's very cheap, And it's highly effective against SARS CoV 2. Speaker 2: I don't even wanna get into this because, I mean, you're the only person saying this. We've gotta listen to our doctors And our scientists Speaker 4: I am a physician and a man of science. I have done nothing nothing but commit myself to scientific truth And the care of patients. Many that I wanna talk about. And I wanna talk about that we have a solution to this crisis. There is a drug that is proving to be of miraculous impact. And when I say miracle, I do not use that term lightly. And I don't wanna be sensationalized when I say that. That is a scientific recommendation based on mountains of data that has emerged in the last 3 months. Mountains of data have emerged from all from many centers and countries around the world showing the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. Speaker 5: Well, firstly, what you said there is incorrect. Now if you only pick up today's papers, the Sydney Morning Herald, Australia's most senior immunologist, Emeritus professor Robert Clancy, Someone that was actually awarded an order of Australia for his services to immunology and medicine. He has said, and I quote, Craig Kelly is absolutely right. Now that's our most senior immunologist. So the idea that, I'm, I completely and utterly reject the idea That I'm out there putting any theories forward. I'm not putting any theories forward at all. Now, yes, some of the studies that I've posted are still undergoing peer review, But many of them have actually been through the peer review process. In fact, I would say the majority of the studies that I've posted have been through the peer reviewed process. And just because something I'm sorry. If that Speaker 2: is just not true, Craig. Speaker 0: I mean, one of the studies you've worked Speaker 2: it's a Bangladeshi plastic surgeon. I would like to take my medical advice from someone who is knowledgeable in infectious diseases is an epidemiologist. Speaker 5: Well, that's all. You should listen Speaker 2: to that. Speaker 0: In other cases, Speaker 5: you should listen to professor Robert Clancy. He's the most senior credentialed immunologist in this country. So that's who I believe we should be listening to. And he is he has said, like, I'll quote exactly What he's wrote Speaker 0: You've just you've already quoted it, Craig. No. Speaker 5: I haven't. I he also said it. I thought this is very important. He said, from uncertain beginnings, An impressive database has more recently been accumulated that strongly supports the use of hydroxychloroquine and or Ivermectin. Their use in concert with the vaccine, so this is not an anti vaxx position. You know, when the use in concert with the vaccines can no longer be denied. In fact, this is the only science based opinion. Now they're not my words. From Speaker 0: That's not my study. You're Speaker 2: referring to. Speaker 0: That's another study you're referring Speaker 2: to because Speaker 0: this is Speaker 5: important. Study. You are misrepresenting what I'm saying. What I'm what I'm No. No. No. But Speaker 2: I did my research, Craig, Speaker 0: as you asked us Speaker 2: to do. Speaker 4: You need to listen for a moment. Speaker 5: But hang on. Speaker 2: Look at that. Is a wonderful drug. You're right. If you have scabies or river blindness Speaker 5: You obviously haven't read. I'm sorry. You are not listening to our you've gotta listen to the science. You've gotta listen Speaker 6: to a doctor. Speaker 4: Are you a scientist? Speaker 2: Are you a scientist, Craig? I'm not. Speaker 5: I am not. I have just quoted the senior immunologist in this country, The most high as credentialed immunologist in this country. Now are you saying that he's wrong? Speaker 7: For the first time in my entire career, I could not be a doctor. I had to stand by idly. I had to stand by idly watching these people Speaker 4: die. Speaker 6: From the FDA, emergency use authorization of medical products related authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, Preventing or treating the disease or condition. If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 8: If a viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then The logic supporting universal vaccination with largely experimental products is no longer supportable.
GlynisFilyaw
Posted - January 1, 2024 at 4:53 PM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 7:32 AM

@GlynisFilyaw - Glynis Filyaw

The War on Ivermectin (2 min 8 seconds) Please Share! The genie is out of the bottle. They don’t want you to have it, which is why you should have it and use it. This is Ivermectin🦄🐝🍀💫💜 https://t.co/F5XsPLoAQv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process and the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. It highlights the financial interests of pharmaceutical companies and the geopolitical implications of widespread access to a cheap and widely available medicine like Ivermectin. The video also questions the safety claims made by Merck, the company that holds the expired patent for Ivermectin. It emphasizes the need for critical evaluation of articles and information that may be influenced by financial motives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From the FDA, Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities. For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization, adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or If Ivermectin were an effective treatment, the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the US. Speaker 1: If a author Viable therapeutic strategy existed for outpatients, then the logic supporting universal vaccination with Largely experimental products is no longer supportable. Speaker 2: The war on Ivermectin is waged by very powerful forces with a lot of money. I mean, Public health was built on a obsessive global vaccination policy, which Ivermectin would have threatened. Speaker 0: We've got Pfizer's Q3 earnings. Revenue, they're projecting to be 98 to $102,000,000,000. Speaker 3: Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna. Do you know how much profit they made from these shots? $1,000 every second from Wuhan virus vaccines. Author Speaker 2: You're talking about 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in geopolitical implications that would affected if the people had access to a safe and widely available medicine. Speaker 4: This is an incredibly cheap Drug. It's off license. It's generic. It can be manufactured in huge amounts in India. Remarkably low cost. Speaker 0: Authorization, Merck's patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996. In 2021, Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against COVID nineteen and bizarrely claimed, quote, a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies. It was plenty safe for Merck to distribute widely when it was still under patent, but now they're claiming the I mean, the safety record is insufficient. Speaker 1: Folks need to understand that just because there is an article out there That asserts that something is false, recognize that those are paid.
VigilantFox
Posted - January 31, 2024 at 8:18 PM
Saved - January 31, 2024 at 11:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, recognized for its impact on human health, was falsely labeled as a dangerous horse dewormer to protect the multi-billion dollar vaccine industry. The Emergency Use Authorization required no alternative treatments to exist. RFK Jr. explains that acknowledging the effectiveness of ivermectin would have collapsed the vaccine enterprise. Studies show ivermectin's potential in treating cancer and reducing excess deaths. Dr. Pierre Kory's book, "War on Ivermectin," delves deeper into this topic.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ivermectin is often recognized – 2nd to penicillin – for having the greatest impact on human health. Its discovery even won the Nobel Prize. But the propagandists told you it was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Now, why would they do such a thing? Because ivermectin’s existence threatened a multi-hundred billion dollar vaccine enterprise. The COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin. And in doing so, Dr. @PierreKory says, “that has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Propaganda is a story or message that influences your thoughts and actions. Most of the information we receive contains subliminal messaging, aiming to control our minds. They want us to believe lies that can harm and even kill us. For example, they promote a medicine as safe when it's actually dangerous and has caused many deaths. This is a serious issue, and that's why I'm here today. I will always fight against propaganda and stand for the truth, even when they come after us. Thank you.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is my definition of propaganda. It's a story or a message that gets you to think or act in a certain way. And if you look and listen carefully to everything you're presented, all the information coming to you from whatever source, remember that almost all of it is can is subliminal messaging. To, they want you to think or act in this this in in another way. And so it's literally mind control, and they get you to believe eyes that will hurt you, those lies will kill you. To believe that it's one of the safest medicines in history that can actually and treat this disease, it's actually a dangerous one that you shouldn't use. That has caused millions of people to die on the world, so this stuff is serious. And this is why I'm here today. This is why I will show up anytime I ever ask. Anytime I'm given the opportunity, I'm gonna fight back as the only enemy of propaganda as truth and truth tellers, and they come after us, but I'm still standing, and I'll keep coming. Thank you.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Ivermectin Had to Be Destroyed “The Federal Emergency Use Authorization Statute says that you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that is demonstrated effective against the target illness,” explained Kennedy. “So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it. And they had to tell everybody it’s not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it’s effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with CNN for portraying them as taking horse medication and conspiring against them. They argue that the medication, ivermectin, is commonly used by humans and has even won a Nobel Prize for its efficacy in humans. They believe that there is a deliberate effort to discredit ivermectin and other medications like hydroxychloroquine to ensure the success of the vaccine industry, which is worth billions of dollars.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw the CNN thing where they made my face yellow and said I was taking horse medication, which is that the most to say that and repeat that over and over again is such a clear indication that they conspired. It's such a because it's this it's uniform. It's horse dewormer, uniform, a medication that's used far more often on human beings. It's been prescribed to Speaker 1: Bill billions. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's insane. And the fact that Speaker 1: And won the Nobel Prize for for efficacy in humans. Speaker 0: Yeah. In humans. Yeah. It was wild. It was just wild. Yeah. Speaker 1: They had to do it. They had to discredit ivermectin because, you know, because there's a federal law. The federal, the emergency use authorization statute says that you cannot issue you cannot issue an emergency use Authorization to a vaccine. If there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose That had that is demonstrated effective against the target illness. So they had to destroy Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit and they had to tell everybody it's not effective. Because if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200,000,000,000 vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

More about ivermectin: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Ivermectin Worked!”: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths https://vigilantnews.com/post/ivermectin-worked-peer-reviewed-study-finds-74-reduction-in-excess-deaths/

“Ivermectin Worked!”: Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths Let this be another tally mark for when the "conspiracy theorists" got it right all along. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever https://vigilantnews.com/post/lessons-from-ivermectin-why-stockpiling-life-saving-drugs-is-more-important-than-ever/

Lessons from Ivermectin: Why Stockpiling Life-Saving Drugs Is More Important Than Ever Ivermectin, a Nobel-Prize-winning human medicine, is often touted as "one of the safest and most effective medicines of this era." Leading doctors believe this drug could have potentially curbed the pandemic at its outset. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you/

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory’s Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. @PierreKory has written an entire book on this. It's called "War on Ivermectin: The Medicine that Saved Millions and Could Have Ended the Pandemic" You can find it here: https://www.amazon.com/War-Ivermectin-Medicine-Millions-Pandemic/dp/151077386X

Sorry! Something went wrong! amazon.com
VigilantFox
Posted - March 8, 2024 at 8:57 PM
Saved - March 8, 2024 at 11:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study published in the Journal of Infection found that individuals treated with ivermectin recovered from COVID-19 quicker and had a lower hospitalization or death rate compared to those who were not treated with it. This raises questions about why ivermectin was vilified and discredited, potentially causing unnecessary deaths. The article by @ZackStieber provides more information on the topic, including the untold story of ivermectin and its potential benefits in treating cancer.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made. And while they were doing so, the propagandists told you ivermectin was a “dangerous horse dewormer.” Well, it just so turns out that a new study published by the Journal of Infection has found that individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 and were treated with ivermectin recovered QUICKER than those who were not. Specifically, the median recovery time was two days faster for those who took ivermectin. The study also found that a smaller percentage of ivermectin recipients (1.6%) were hospitalized or died compared to 4% in the comparison group. That sure sounds a lot more effective than the so-called vaccines. So, why did authorities vilify ivermectin? Because the COVID shots forced upon the world would not be able to exist if ivermectin was shown to be effective. The Emergency Use Authorization states: “For the FDA to issue an EUA, there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative candidate product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.” So, they had to smear and discredit ivermectin. And in doing so, critical care physician Dr. Pierre Kory says, “That has caused millions of people to die around the world.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

People Who Received Ivermectin Were Better Off, Study Finds Read the article by @ZackStieber below: https://vigilantnews.com/post/people-who-received-ivermectin-were-better-off-study-finds/

People Who Received Ivermectin Were Better Off, Study Finds Funding for the research came from the UK government. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ZackStieber Related Stories: Ivermectin: The Untold Story of a ‘Miracle Drug’ https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/the-untold-story-of-a-miracle-drug-4952578?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

The Untold Story of a 'Miracle Drug' theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ZackStieber Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-ivermectin-treat-turbo-cancers-9-ivermectin-papers-reviewed/

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? – 9 Papers Reviewed Oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis uncovers what Big Pharma doesn't want you to know about ivermectin's anti-cancer mechanisms. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@ZackStieber 6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving https://vigilantnews.com/post/6-secrets-of-ivermectin-the-medication-that-keeps-on-giving/

6 Secrets of Ivermectin: The Medication That Keeps on Giving This article originally appeared on drturner.substack.com and was republished with permission.Guest post by Michael Turner, M.D.Greetings Dear Friends,Inspired anew by my recent podcast with my friend Dr. Kory (who must be considered the world's expert on the use of Ivermectin in COVID), I wanted to share some summary insights with you about this truly astonishing vigilantnews.com
jessies_now
Posted - May 16, 2024 at 12:25 PM
Saved - May 17, 2024 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, a cheap and multi-use therapeutic, has been proven effective in curing Covid and other viruses. It won a medical Nobel prize in 2015 and is also used for malaria and soft tissue cancers. Its potential to save lives during Covid is remarkable. #Ivermectin #CovidTreatment

@jessies_now - ♡ 𝓙𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓮 ♡🌿🌷🌿💋😘

Yup, another 'Conspiracy Theory' proven true 👇 according to @rustyrockets. Ivermectin cures Covid & a host of other viruses. Ivermectin won a medical Nobel prize in 2015 for being an effective, cheap, multi-use therapeutic. Buy some online & keep just in case another virus is released this Fall. It's also used for malaria & other pathogens. Now I am reading it is being used for treating soft tissue cancers. Wow. Just think about the lives it could have saved during Covid. 😭😠 No doubt about it - Ivermectin is a miracle drug!!

5DSoul
Posted - August 20, 2024 at 8:13 AM
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 8:54 AM

@5DSoul - Seraphina 💫

Ivermectin is “one of the most violent anti fertility toxins I’ve ever come across” - Dr Mike Yeadon It was pushed on us jab refusers, as it’s a tool for genocide. Always keep your wits about you, and beware cures for diseases that don’t exist Full pod: https://rumble.com/v5ba9jx-delingpod-live-mike-yeadon.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've recently learned about the push for early COVID-19 treatments, particularly Ivermectin, which I initially thought was beneficial. However, I've discovered that it may be a harmful fertility toxin, affecting conception and fetal development. This raises questions about the motives behind its promotion. Additionally, many supplements marketed for health may actually hinder the body's ability to eliminate Ivermectin, creating dangerous drug interactions. This suggests a troubling connection between these products and the ongoing health crisis. It's essential to be cautious with pharmaceutical products and supplements, as the implications could be significant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've only learned in the last 3 weeks, and so you probably won't have heard it. But it all fits when I say it. You know that there was, you know, Team Hero, the alternative media people, not me. People who are a 100 times more famous around the world. I won't mention them at this particular point, but you all know who I'm thinking. So many doctors who are Americans. And as soon as the pandemic arrived, they came up with early treatment for COVID-nineteen, didn't they? And they pushed and pushed and pushed. I at first I thought there was a virus, and so it was great that they were coming out with treatment. Then later when I realized there wasn't, I thought they were I thought why are they pushing this stuff? I thought they're pushing harmless placebos on the worried well, And they're providing a belief structure that really is a pandemic. Otherwise, why would these clever people be going out of their way to sell you this stuff? And it's like, unfortunately, it's much worse than that. One of the center stage drugs that they want you to take, Ivermectin, is one of the most violent fertility toxins I've ever come across. And I didn't know this because like you, you probably didn't think to do the deep research and I didn't. So someone contacted me a few weeks ago with a bloody great dossier of papers that go back from its discovery And it's unquestionably around the doses you're being suggested to take in rats and rabbits. And in some limited studies in humans, it reduces the ability to conceive and to grow babies to to to term. And doesn't it fit? Doesn't it fit? Why did this this is there's nothing that's major on the world stage that's accidental, I'm afraid. Yes. That's the problem. And so now you know there's nothing major on the world stage that's accidental. Who put Ivermects in there? Well, the people the perpetrators did. And why did they put it there? It's like, if you don't get jabbed and avoid impacts on your facility, a good chunk of you will take Ivermectin instead. It gets worse. And then I'll stop talking about this because I haven't written about it yet. But it's on my mind. There are lots of other supplements that the worried whale take. And again, I thought it was mainly a money making business. All right. A money making business. They'll sell you K2 or beverages. And there's loads of things I've never heard of. If you look at them in the health so called health food store, my wife will often ask me, What will this do? I've said, I've never heard of it. I was originally a biochemist and toxicologist. I've never heard of it. Have to look it up. It's real. It does exist. So I thought they were just flogging benign, placebos to the worried well just to steal money off them. Unfortunately, it's not so. Many of the supplements, including most of the really famous ones, hamper the elimination from your body of Ivermectin. So if you're a person that thinks, Well, I'm going to take care of my health and not have the jabs, I've got this ivermectin that'll protect me. And I've got all these other supplements, and those supplements stop your body eliminating ivermectin. It's a drug drug a negative drug drug interaction. It's like, this can't be coincidence, folks. That is not a coincidence. So don't take anything. You know, honestly, don't take just don't take pharmaceutical products, said the guy that works in the pharmacist industry for 31 years.
delingpod LIVE: Mike Yeadon The eagerly-awaited, live recording of the excellent delingpod LIVE event from back in June. Very kindly sponsored by the Good Food Project: https://www.goodfoodproject.co.uk ↓ ↓ ↓ Buy James a Coffee rumble.com
CartlandDavid
Posted - November 9, 2024 at 9:12 AM
Saved - November 9, 2024 at 6:01 PM

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)

Alex Jones: "We now learned this year that $2.3 billion was given by the government, by the CDC and FDA to pharmacies, mainly Walgreens and CVS to not prescribe Ivermectin and things that the doctors were prescribing. And now the feds have had to admit: "Ok it did work’ Ryan Cole https://t.co/Dha9aYztYS

Video Transcript AI Summary
This year, it was revealed that $2.3 billion was allocated by the government, specifically the CDC and FDA, to pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS to discourage the prescription of ivermectin and other treatments recommended by doctors. The federal government has now acknowledged that these treatments were effective and expressed regret for suppressing them, admitting that this has led to unnecessary deaths. The influence of big pharma, particularly figures like Bill Gates, has resulted in restrictions on what healthcare professionals can prescribe, leading to consequences such as decertification and job loss for those who defy these guidelines. This situation highlights the dangers of a powerful cartel controlling medical practices.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We now learned this year that $2,300,000,000 was given by the government, by the CDC and FDA to pharmacies, mainly Walgreens and CBS to not prescribe ivermectin and things that the doctors were prescribing. And now the feds have had to admit, okay. It did work. We suppress it. We're sorry. We killed a bunch of people. So we've got to the point where big pharma, which kinda Bill Gates up at the top, who's not even a doctor, is deciding through these systems what doctors, nurses, and nurse practitioners can do and and and and and then they also, again, hang you guys out to dry, decertify you, try to get you fired. I mean, this is really a very dangerous cartel.
bensmithlive
Posted - November 25, 2024 at 9:10 PM
Saved - November 26, 2024 at 1:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Ivermectin could be a groundbreaking cancer treatment, despite its past as a "horse de-wormer." Extensive research shows it has at least 15 anti-cancer mechanisms, including apoptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis. Notably, it earned Merck a Nobel Prize for its role in combating parasitic diseases and was recognized as an essential medicine by WHO. Some studies suggest higher doses may effectively stop cancer cell growth and metastasis. I also question why Ivermectin faced ridicule during COVID, hinting at financial motives behind the narrative.

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

Ivermectin is the future of cancer treatment. This drug was once labeled "horse de-wormer." Today, extensive research reveals it has 15 powerful ANTI-CANCER mechanisms of action. Let’s look at the science behind how it works: 🧵

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

First off, IVM had earned Merck’s scientists a Nobel Prize in 2015 for saving millions from parasitic diseases. WHO even listed it as an “essential medicine.” During COVID, it was a target of ridicule. Today, we look at it as a potential anti-cancer drug ↓

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

Ivermectin has at least 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action (apoptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis, etc.) Let me explain the above-mentioned ↓

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

→ Apoptosis Apoptosis is a programmed cell death—a natural process where cells are instructed to self-destruct in an organised way. Cancer cells evade this mechanism, but treatments like Ivermectin may help restore this cellular cleanup system.

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

→ Autophagy It forces cancer cells to "eat themselves" through their internal recycling system. Studies on breast cancer cells showed IVM increases LC3, Bclin1, Atg5 (autophagy proteins) forming "self-eating" structures. Scientists proved this by blocking the process. Cancer-killing stopped.

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

→ Pyroptosis Think of it as your body's controlled explosion system. Cells detect threats via inflammasomes, activate caspase-1, and trigger Gasdermin D, causing them to swell and explode. This inflammatory death releases signals alerting the immune system, potentially key in fighting cancer and infection.

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

Other IVM’s anti-cancer mechanisms of action: • Inhibits tumor growth/proliferation • Inhibits tumor initiation/progression • Regulates tumor micro-environment • Causes cancer cell mitochondrial dysfunction • Stops cancer cell migration, invasion & metastasis

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

According to Dr. William Makis: “They [researchers] have found that if you give higher doses of Ivermectin than what’s been used for COVID-19, that it actually can stop the growth of these cancer cells, it can stop their metastases, and it can actually engage apoptosis and autophagy and kill these cancer cells.”

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

In this interview with the cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, she talks about her patient who had cancer in 11 bones in his body. A few months later, this patient was told he was in a remission. How is this possible? He took Ivermectin ↓

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early days of COVID, I learned about Ivermectin's potential in cancer treatment. I met Paul, a healthy marathoner diagnosed with stage 4 prostate cancer shortly after his second Pfizer vaccine. After exhausting traditional treatments, he was given no options and referred to hospice. A friend suggested I speak with him for support. I recommended Ivermectin, which he obtained in Tennessee without telling his oncologist. Over time, he reported slight improvements, and during a follow-up, his PSA levels dropped significantly, indicating a biochemical remission. Despite some health issues, including TIAs, he eventually saw a cardiologist and improved further. Nine months later, he was dancing and had no new cancer growth, with some bone metastases gone. He felt so well that he said if he didn't know he had cancer, he wouldn't suspect it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the early days of COVID, when it became clear that Ivermectin was effective in preventing and treating patients with a SARS CoV 2 infection, I began to be aware, having looked in the literature, that there was 20 years of research showing that ivermectin had great potential in the treatment of cancer. I was introduced to a patient with stage 4 prostate cancer. Had received 2 vaccines, perfectly healthy marathoner, no history of cancer in the family. 2 months after his, second Pfizer shot, he works for the government. He's gonna lose his job and his pension if he wasn't vaccinated. He was diagnosed all at once with stage 4 prostate cancer. He tells a very compelling story, melodramatic story, about that 24 hour period of time in his life. And he went through the traditional protocols, radiation, chemotherapy, radiation, chemo therapy, pharmacologic, castration, all of it, over a period of 9 months. And then his doctor said, you know, there's really nothing else we can do. And, his name is Paul Mann, and he was like, can't you give me more radiation? No. Can't you give me more chemo? No. Aren't there any other drugs? No. Are there any clinical trials? There's nothing. Hospice, Send for the priest. So a friend of his knew me and she said, would you give Paul a call? He just needs some moral support, something. So I said, Sure. So I began calling him. We spoke about once a week for 3 weeks. And finally, the poor guy was suffering. He had cancer and 11 bones in his body. His right leg was completely swollen, obstructed with tumor. He's miserable. And I said, Well, I don't know if this is going to help you, but I know it's not going to hurt you. I just can't imagine, based on my judgment and understanding of the scientific literature and all of the work that doctors Drs. Corey and Merrick had done and others around the world, that Ivermectin would hurt you. It might help. I can't say. So he said, You know, I'll give it a try. And he drove to Tennessee where you could get it without a prescription. P. S. I discovered last night, having dinner with Paul and his wife, Terry, he drove from where he lives in Missouri to Tennessee and paid cash for his ivermectin. That's it. He didn't submit it to an insurance company. He didn't tell anybody back in Missouri. He's oncologist. No. His ivermectin prescriptions are listed in his chart at listed in his chart. How does that information get from the pharmacy in Tennessee to his chart in Missouri? We don't know. If somebody does, I'd like to know myself. Anyway, he starts taking ivermectin. And he doesn't have any problems with it. And I talk to him every week. And how are you feeling? Well, no change. Next week. Maybe a little bit better. I don't know. How's your leg? It's not quite as swollen. How how's the pain? Pain everywhere. Maybe a little bit better. Slowly, slowly, slowly, not getting worse. Not necessarily getting better, not getting worse. Fast forward, 2 month follow-up appointment at the clinic. They didn't expect to see him. Okay. He's like, Paul! He's feeling a little bit better. They do PSA, which was off the charts to begin with. And if I'm not mistaken, at the time they randomized him to hospice, I think it was in the 100. Maybe 700, 800, something. What does that mean exactly for the layperson? Over 4 would be abnormal. Mhmm. Okay. So what are we talking about here? Prostate cells normally secrete a protein. Prostate specific antigen, it's one of the things that they do. Cancer cells that originate in the prostate that are dividing rapidly and growing fast are spitting out PSA. Okay? It's not that they're contributing to the body economy in any way. It's just they just want to multiply and divide, and that's the end of the story. And so your PSA levels start to rise, which is a marker, a screening marker. Oh, your PSA was 4, and now it's 8. Let's do a prostate ultrasound, whatever. So PSA can be a screen for the emergence of a tumor, but it can also be used, particularly at high levels, as evidence for cancer, response to cancer, recurrence of cancer. His was all I mean, it's supposed to be, you know, 4. You know? Yeah. It's 100. Okay. He goes back for his 2 month appointment. It's 1.3. They said, you're in remission. Well, not, you know, complete remission. He still had the bone mets, but you're in, like, a biochemical remission. Well, that was good news. Slowly, slowly, slowly, he begins to improve. Less pain. Swelling is okay. A lot of other vaccine injuries. However, he's getting better. He's getting better, giving him nutritional support and other supplements. He's having TIAs, little mini strokes. But he didn't tell me about that, because we were talking about the cancer. But over a period of time, I asked him questions. I said, Oh, you're having TIAs? His wife said, Yeah, you're having TIAs. I said, What do the cancer doctors tell you? Because that's who he was seeing. They say, It's not related to my cancer. So I get a call from his wife one evening. He's in the emergency room. He's had this TIA, whatever it is, catastrophic. And I said, Paul, what are they doing for you? And he said, Well, they did a CAT scan of my head. And they said they don't see anything specific. It's a TIA, and it's not related to my cancer. They send him home. I said, did they do anything? No. I said, well, okay. Call me crazy. I'm a cancer surgeon, but I think you need to see a cardiologist. I think there are things they can do, okay? And of course, I look it up really quickly. And of course, there are things. So get him to the cardiologist. Get him on blood thinners. No more problems with TIAs. Okay? That's an indictment of the healthcare system. So he's getting better. But 9 months later, he's out dancing for 4 hours, 3 nights a week. He gets a head to toe rescanning. And 3 of the bone mets are gone. There are no growth of the mets that are there. No new lesions. There's only one hot spot, and that's where he received radiation therapy. And the radiation, the radiologist really could not distinguish whether that was a tumor hot spot or radiation change. Mhmm. He is doing very well. The vaccine injury is, a problem, but the cancer is no longer a problem except for the fact that it's still there, and we wanna get rid of it completely. And he would and he said he called me from a hockey game, and he said, if I didn't know I have cancer, I would not know I have cancer.

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

During COVID, IVM worked safely in prevention and treatment. Why did they vilify it? What went wrong? As always, the answer is money. • Ivermectin: 40¢/dose • The new drug—Molnupiravir: $700/course Once you see it—you can't unsee it.

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

This story is too dark and long to tell in one thread. The lies. The crimes. The cover-ups. Episode 2 of Modern Health Renaissance exposes what really happened in 2020 with the vaccine, IVM, and media manipulation. You can watch it now on YT: https://youtu.be/-Je5S7iC89k?si=G0AQrhUDQRW3EsAG

@bensmithlive - Ben Smith

Thanks for reading! If you like this thread, you’ll love my Telegram. https://t.me/bensbroadcast https://t.me/bensbroadcast

Ben Smith Ben Smith’s Private Broadcast t.me
Ben Smith Ben Smith’s Private Broadcast t.me
GinaSaysSo
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 11:06 AM
Saved - December 9, 2024 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that over 200 members of Congress and their families were secretly treated with Ivermectin for Covid-19, which was proven to be safe and effective. It raises questions about why they remained silent during a global pandemic and why mainstream media labeled it as horse de-wormer. The CDC and FDA also downplayed its effectiveness, even mocking Americans. Meanwhile, the government allegedly paid pharmacies to remove Ivermectin from shelves, prioritizing profits from vaccines over public health. This situation feels like a betrayal, and it’s time to channel that anger into action.

@GinaSaysSo - Gina

Members of Congress and their familes were secretely treated with Ivermectin for Covid 19. It was PROVEN a safe and effective treatment. So why were these 200 members of Congress silent about their success with the Ivermectin treatment? Why the secret? Weren't we in the middle of a Global Pandemic? Why was MSM labeling it horse de-wormer? Meantime the corrupted CDC and FDA also kept Ivermectin a secret with the FDA even shaming Americans with warnings like this: 'You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.' And, as for the 81 million (my ass) installed puppet: ON BIDEN'S WATCH OUR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PAID PHARMACIES HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO STRIP THEIR SHELVES OF IVERMECTIN. Wanna know why? With a safe and effective existing treatment for Covid, there would be no Emergency Use Authorization granted for the 'vaccine.' Nevermind safe. Nevermind effective. We're talking about power and money and that's everything to big government. So Ivermectin vanished in an MSM-created cloud of shame. This 'horse-dewormer' could have saved millions of lives. Our government was more interested in the BILLIONS it could make in partnership with big pharma. Our lives didn't matter to the Biden Administration. Biden/Harris were installed to DESTROY us. Find your anger. Then find your resolve.

TheChiefNerd
Posted - January 10, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 2:13 AM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

GIBSON: "I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all." ROGAN: "What did they take?" GIBSON: "Ivermectin, Fenbendazole" https://t.co/onLx5bvDcG

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have three friends who had stage 4 cancer, and now they are cancer-free. They used treatments like Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, and methylene blue, which was originally a textile dye but has shown significant benefits for mitochondria. It's surprising to see effective treatments being overlooked, raising questions about the medical industry's priorities. Why are cures that aren't profitable often ignored or demonized? This situation highlights a failure in our medical institutions to promote genuinely effective solutions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you a good story. Okay. I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer. All 3 of them don't have cancer right now at all, and they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken? Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Yeah. That's Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. They drank hydrochloride something or other. There's studies on that now where people have proven that they drinking methylene blue and stuff like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Yeah. Yeah. It was a textile dye. And now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. This stuff works, man. Yeah. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange. Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that they turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions, how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

Full Episode (#2254): @joerogan

Mr_Fireside
Posted - May 26, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 8:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scott Adams has revealed he has terminal cancer and has tried Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, which did not work. Dr. William Makis, who treated Adams, stated that the treatment protocol requires at least three months and has a 75% success rate. Both drugs are known for their ability to kill parasites and have been explored as potential cancer treatments, though there is limited human clinical trial data. The discussion emphasizes the right of patients to explore various treatment options, regardless of mainstream skepticism.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Scott Adams revealed he has terminal cancer. He says he tried Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. They didn't work. The Doctor behind it explains why...🧵

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

The Doctor? Dr. William Makis. Well known on X for his perspectives on C0VID💉and fighting Cancer with well known repurposed drugs.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Dr. Makis confirms he treated Adams for about a month. But says that the treatment protocol including Ivermectin and Fenbendazole (Fenben) takes at least 3 months.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

He also confirmed via his substack, that no protocol has a 100% success rate and that his protocol which includes Ivermectin and Fenben has about a 75% success rate.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

I'm not going to get involved in the back and forth between Makis and Adams. I wish Adams all the very best and hope he finds peace or health (or both). Instead let's look at Ivermectin and Fenben.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Ivermectin has been around since the 70s and even has a Nobel Prize backing it. Fenben was discovered around the same time. They are both known as anthelmintics. Meaning: they KILL PARASITES.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Ivermectin paralyzes and kills parasites by messing with their nerve and muscle signals. Fenben kills parasites by blocking the building of microtubules (tiny structures that parasites need to grow and divide).

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Fenben is what is called a benzimidazole. Another drug in this same 'benzi' class that is used as part of these new anti-Cancer protocols is called Mebendazole.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

The three (ivermectin, fenben and meben) together with Vit D, Zinc and other forms of therapy have recently been published as potential new Cancer fighting protocols. The manuscript was published in September 2024 in the Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Outside of the recent publication on Ivermectin and Benzi's (Fenben & Meben), we know very little about their Cancer killing abilities. That's not to say that they don't work.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Ivermectin has a raft of ways that it potentially fights and kills cancer: ✅Apoptosis (programmed cell death) ✅Autophagy (tumor suppression via cell recycling) ✅Pyroptosis (inflammatory form of programmed cell death)

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Fenben and Meben stop cancer in other ways: ✅Disrupting microtubules (essential for cell division) ✅Starves cancer cells through glucose uptake ✅Triggering apoptosis (similar to Ivermectin)

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

But how, where and when did all of this begin? Ivermectin and Benzi's are well known parasite killers. They're not traditional cancer treatments.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Fenben went viral as a potential treatment in 2018/2019 when Joe Tippens told the world his story. Tippens was dying of small cell lung cancer. It had spread to his stomach, neck, liver, and pancreas. It was everywhere.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Tippens veterinarian turned him onto Fenben saying he had heard stories from clients about it treating Cancer in animals. There was nothing to lose at this stage and so Tippens tried it and 3 months later, his cancer was gone!

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Similarly Ivermectin made global headlines during the C0vid years for its ability to treat SARS-CoV-2. In 2021, Joe Rogan took a doctor-prescribed, human-grade ivermectin along with other therapies to treat C0vid, and it worked. The media went bonkers! How dare he.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Both Ivermectin and Benzi's have been written about as potential Cancer treatments since about the 2000s. Fenben’s anti-cancer effects were first noted in 2008, when researchers found that cancer cells failed to grow in lab animals treated with the drug for parasites.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

And Avermectin (Ivermectin's naturally occurring cousin) was reported to possess antitumor action on mice in 2004.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

But again, there's almost no human clinical trials. One trial which is currently underway on Ivermectin and expected to be completed by 2026: Ivermectin and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Fenben is not even approved for human use by the FDA! Meben on the other hand has a number of research papers and clinical studies: • Clinical Trial on Gastrointestinal Cancer • Randomized Controlled Trial on Colorectal Cancer • Phase 1 Trial on Pediatric Brain Tumors

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Meanwhile the New York Times is publishing articles warning against the use of Ivermectin for cancer...

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

And Frontiers (a leading open-access academic publisher) was caught doing the same with Fenben after the Joe Tippens story went viral in Korea.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

How dare people dying of cancer try cheap, safe, potential solutions? The point of all this, is not to prove that Ivermectin or Benzi's can cure, kill or slow cancer. The point is that people have The Right to Try.

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

That's it! If you enjoyed this or got anything out of it please like the first, bookmark and repost it. Oh, and follow me for more like this @Mr_Fireside

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Scott Adams revealed he has terminal cancer. He says he tried Ivermectin & Fenbendazole. They didn't work. The Doctor behind it explains why...🧵

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

Sources I used when researching this thread: 1.https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-30158-6 2.https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/31/well/ivermectin-cancer-covid.html 3.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15464058/ 4.https://makismd.substack.com/ 5.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin 6.https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2015/press-release/ 7.https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/2687140 8.https://chambersclinic.com/2024/05/23/the-potential-anti-cancer-effects-of-fenbendazole-what-the-research-says/ 9.https://isom.ca/article/targeting-the-mitochondrial-stem-cell-connection-in-cancer-treatment-a-hybrid-orthomolecular-protocol/ 10.https://www.koco.com/article/edmond-man-claims-cheap-drug-for-dogs-cured-his-cancer/27276538 11.https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/44/9/3725 12.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8949985/ 13.https://journals.lww.com/anti-cancerdrugs/abstract/1996/09000/the_abamectin_derivative_ivermectin_is_a_potent.5.aspx 14.https://gatewaycr.org/for-researchers/clinical-trials/a-phase-i-ii-study-evaluating-the-safety-and-efficacy-of-ivermectin-in-combination-with-balstilimab-in-patients-with-metastatic-triple-negative-breast-cancer-with-expansion-cohort-in-pd-l1-negative-tn/ 15.https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05318469 16.https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.942045/full 17.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364397452_Exceptional_Repositioning_of_Dog_Dewormer_Fenbendazole_Fever

Fenbendazole acts as a moderate microtubule destabilizing agent and causes cancer cell death by modulating multiple cellular pathways - Scientific Reports Drugs that are already clinically approved or experimentally tested for conditions other than cancer, but are found to possess previously unrecognized cytotoxicity towards malignant cells, may serve as fitting anti-cancer candidates. Methyl N-(6-phenylsulfanyl-1H benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate [Fenbendazole, FZ], a benzimidazole compound, is a safe and inexpensive anthelmintic drug possessing an efficient anti-proliferative activity. In our earlier work, we reported a potent growth-inhibitory activity of FZ caused partially by impairment of proteasomal function. Here, we show that FZ demonstrates moderate affinity for mammalian tubulin and exerts cytotoxicity to human cancer cells at micromolar concentrations. Simultaneously, it caused mitochondrial translocation of p53 and effectively inhibited glucose uptake, expression of GLUT transporters as well as hexokinase (HK II) - a key glycolytic enzyme that most cancer cells thrive on. It blocked the growth of human xenografts in nu/nu mice model when mice were fed with the drug orally. The results, in conjunction with our earlier data, suggest that FZ is a new microtubule interfering agent that displays anti-neoplastic activity and may be evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent because of its effect on multiple cellular pathways leading to effective elimination of cancer cells. nature.com
What Ivermectin Can (and Can’t) Do Social media posts have promoted the anti-parasitic drug for cancer and Covid. That has doctors alarmed. nytimes.com
Antitumor effect of avermectins - PubMed The effect of a mixture of naturally occurring aversectin C and avermectin B(1) on the growth of ascites and solid experimental tumors of mice was studied. It was shown for the first time that avermectins possess a pronounced antitumor action. When added at nontoxic doses, they significantly suppres … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
COVID Intel - by Dr.William Makis | Dr. William Makis MD | Substack In depth INTEL on COVID-19, Sudden Deaths, mRNA Vaccines, Turbo Cancer, Cancer Treatments, Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, Vaccine injuries, H5N1, New Pandemics and so much more... Click to read COVID Intel - by Dr.William Makis, by Dr. William Makis MD, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers. makismd.substack.com
Ivermectin - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
The 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - Press release - NobelPrize.org nobelprize.org
The Potential Anti-Cancer Effects of Fenbendazole: What the Research Says – Chambers Clinic chambersclinic.com
Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol . Introduction Many theories exist regarding the origin of cancer, namely the metabolic theory (Seyfried & Chinopoulos, 2021), the somatic mutation theory (SMT) (Hanahan & Weinberg, 2000), the cancer stem cell theory (Capp, 2019), and the tissue organization theory (Soto & Sonnenschein, 2011). In a recently published study, a new concept was introduced the isom.ca
Edmond man says cheap drug for dogs cured his cancer When you tell someone a medicine for dogs cured your cancer, you better be ready for some skeptics, but Joe Tippens says it saved his life, and the lives of others. koco.com
Oral Fenbendazole for Cancer Therapy in Humans and Animals Fenbendazole is a benzimidazole anthelmintic agent commonly used to treat animal parasitic infections. In humans, other benzimidazoles, such as mebendazole and albendazole, are used as antiparasitic agents. Since fenbendazole is not currently approved by the FDA or EMA, its pharmacokinetics and safety in humans have yet to be well-documented in medical literature. Despite this, insights can be drawn from existing in vitro and in vivo animal studies on its pharmacokinetics. Given the low cost of fenbendazole, its high safety profile, accessibility, and unique anti-proliferative activities, fenbendazole would be the preferred benzimidazole compound to treat cancer. To ensure patient safety in the repurposing use of fenbendazole, it is crucial to perform clinical trials to assess its potential anticancer effects, optimal doses, therapeutic regimen, and tolerance profiles. This review focuses on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered fenbendazole and its promising anticancer biological activities, such as inhibiting glycolysis, down-regulating glucose uptake, inducing oxidative stress, and enhancing apoptosis in published experimental studies. Additionally, we evaluated the toxicity profile of fenbendazole and discussed possibilities for improving the bioavailability of the drug, enhancing its efficacy, and reducing potential toxicity. ar.iiarjournals.org
The abamectin derivative ivermectin is a potent P-glycoprotein inhibitor - PubMed Among the compounds endowed with the capacity to reverse the P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-mediated multidrug resistance of cancer cells, a powerful agent was found to be the cyclosporin D derivative SDZ PSC 833. After in vivo treatment with SDZ PSC 833, mice showed a decreased tolerability to cyclosporin A … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin in Combination with Balstilimab in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer with expansion cohort in PD-L1 negative TNBC - Gateway For Cancer Research A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Ivermectin in Combination with Balstilimab in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer with expansion cohort in PD-L1 negative TNBC Summary: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancers and it is highly aggressive, accounting for a disproportionate amount of metastatic gatewaycr.org
Frontiers | How cancer patients get fake cancer information: From TV to YouTube, a qualitative study focusing on fenbendazole scandle BackgroundKorean society has faced challenges in communicating with cancer patients about false information related to complementary alternative medicine. As... frontiersin.org
ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@Mr_Fireside - Mr_Fireside

For those new to my work on X: I research and write threads like these all the time. Researching and writing threads takes a lot of time and energy. If you got anything out of it, consider: liking, reposting and following me for more @Mr_Fireside

newstart_2024
Posted - August 6, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 9:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the controversy surrounding Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning drug with a long safety record, which has shown potential against cancer and COVID. Despite its promise, Merck dismissed it for COVID treatment after its patent expired in 1996, opting instead to partner with Moderna on lucrative mRNA cancer vaccines. Critics, including Dr. William Makis, argue that Merck buried evidence of Ivermectin's effectiveness due to its low cost and off-patent status, prioritizing profits over patient care.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Big Pharma's Shame: Ivermectin Could Save Lives, but Merck Chose Profits Instead A Nobel Prize-winning drug. A decades-long safety record. A potential game-changer for cancer & COVID. So why was Ivermectin vilified? The Truth: Merck’s patent expired in 1996. Now, they’re partnered with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines—a BILLION-dollar venture. Conflict of Interest? Merck dismissed ivermectin for COVID… while quietly sitting on evidence it may FIGHT CANCER. High-dose ivermectin has shown remarkable promise against multiple cancers. But it’s cheap, off-patent—no profit for Big Pharma. "They buried the science for greed," says Dr. William Makis MD. "Patients deserve the truth—not a profit-driven medical monopoly."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivermectin, a Nobel Prize-winning anti-parasitic drug, has been vilified. Merck, who held the patent until 1996, claims it doesn't work for COVID-19. However, Merck has a 50/50 partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Because Merck will make billions on mRNA cancer vaccines, they have no interest in investigating ivermectin for cancer. There is evidence that high-dose ivermectin is effective in treating many types of cancers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivermectin has been vilified. It is a Nobel Prize winning drug that has been used as an anti parasitic for many many years. Merck had it on patent until 1996. And interestingly enough, Merck said it doesn't work for COVID-nineteen. Well, we find out now that Merck has a fiftyfifty partnership with Moderna on mRNA cancer vaccines. Merck is going to be making billions of dollars on cancer and mRNA cancer vaccines. So they have no interest in continuing to investigate ivermectin for cancer, for example, because it's cheap, it's off patent, they're not going to make any money on it. So there is tremendous amount of evidence that high dose ivermectin is extremely effective in treating many types of cancers.
craigbrockie
Posted - August 10, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Saved - August 11, 2025 at 1:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ivermectin, often dismissed as "horse dewormer," is a Nobel Prize-winning drug developed for humans, effective in treating river blindness and more. Research is now exploring its potential in cancer treatment and as an antiviral. It operates by paralyzing parasites and blocking viral/cancer protein transport. Users report benefits like clearer skin and improved energy. Proper dosage and medical supervision are crucial for safety. Despite its low cost and effectiveness, it faced suppression during COVID due to financial interests. I believe it warrants unbiased research and recognition.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

They called it horse dewormer. But Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize. Now researchers are exploring it as a cancer treatment, a parasite detox, and even an antiviral. Here's why it works (and how to use it safely): 🧵

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

The mockery was relentless during COVID. "Horse paste" they sneered. But Ivermectin was developed FOR humans and won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine for virtually eliminating river blindness and other diseases. 4 billion human doses later, it's still saving lives.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Ivermectin works through two distinct mechanisms: In parasites: binds to key metabolic channels, causing paralysis and death. In viruses/cancer: blocks specific proteins that transport viral/cancer proteins into cell nuclei. Dual action = broad spectrum power.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

The anti-cancer research is stunning. While all this is early-stage research, oncologists like @MakisMD have noted ivermectin’s “15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.”

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

As a parasite detox, Ivermectin clears worms, mites, and protozoa that mainstream medicine often misses. Chronic fatigue, unexplained skin issues, digestive problems? Hidden parasites could be the culprit. One dose can eliminate years of immune system burden.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

In addition to ridding parasites, it's crucial to heal your gut. Read the NY Times best-seller "Super Gut" for full details. It introduces the breakthrough of making your own high-strength probiotics at home. That's why I made this machine: https://amazon.com/dp/B0C5S6XVK7?maas=maas_adg_6BF236D9766CE5D11A11E4C3EC708800_afap_abs&ref_=aa_maas&tag=maas&field-keywords=wellness+gifts

Sorry! Something went wrong! amazon.com

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Ivermectin's antiviral effects surprised researchers. Lab studies show activity against West Nile virus, SARS-CoV-2, and other diseases. In one COVID study, a 5000-fold reduction in viral RNA within 48 hours. Early treatment may reduce viral load before symptoms worsen.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Real-world benefits people report: • Clearer skin (especially rosacea) • Better gut function after parasite clearing • Mental clarity & reduced brain fog • Improved energy levels • Immune system improvement The body heals when burdens are removed.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Dosage protocols for safety: • 0.2-0.4 mg per kg body weight (12-24mg for a 60kg adult). • Pharmaceutical-grade tablets. • Typical course: single dose or multiple days depending on indication. Medical supervision is essential.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Critical safety notes: • Avoid in pregnancy, severe liver disease, or children under 5 • Never use animal formulations • Always consult a doctor • Stick to proven dosing ranges Over 4 billion doses have been given safely when used correctly.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Why was it suppressed during COVID? Simple: Ivermectin is off-patent. At $1 per dose, no pharmaceutical company can profit from it. Meanwhile, new patented drugs like remdesivir cost $3,000+ per treatment. Follow the money.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

I took ivermectin myself during COVID and recovered quickly. Many doctors quietly prescribe it off-label because they've seen it work. But medical boards threatened licenses for those who spoke publicly about it. Science by intimidation, not evidence.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Ivermectin isn't a miracle cure-all. But it's far more than "horse dewormer." From eliminating parasites to emerging cancer protocols, it deserves unbiased research, not corporate censorship. The best treatments are often the simplest and cheapest.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

To get more empowering health information: •Follow me @craigbrockie •Get the first chapter of my “Ultimate Health” book FREE (click the image below) https://CraigBrockie.com/newsletter

FREE Newsletter - Secrets of Health and Happiness - Craig Brockie Want to take control of your health? Sign up now for my FREE newsletter to look and feel 10 years younger craigbrockie.com

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

Thanks for reading! If you found this thread useful, give it a retweet so others can also benefit from it. And follow me @craigbrockie for science-based insights to improve your health and longevity.

@craigbrockie - Craig Brockie

They called it horse dewormer. But Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize. Now researchers are exploring it as a cancer treatment, a parasite detox, and even an antiviral. Here's why it works (and how to use it safely): 🧵 https://t.co/1SBfFg4uX7

itscarterhughes
Posted - January 20, 2026 at 7:14 PM
Saved - January 22, 2026 at 2:04 AM

@itscarterhughes - Carter Hughes

🚨Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage four cancer. All 3 of them don't have cancer right now at all." Joe Rogan: "What did they take?" Mel Gibson: "Ivermectin, Fenbendazole" Why doesn't the media report this? Follow: @ItsCarterHughes https://t.co/Gkqyn2iZw1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all. And they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Yep. Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken. Speaker 1: Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's it. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. Speaker 0: They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on Speaker 1: that now where people have proven that they've Speaker 0: drinking methylene blue and stuff Speaker 1: like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It was a textile dye, and now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. Speaker 0: This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange Speaker 1: Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you a good story. Okay. I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all. And they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Yep. Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken. Speaker 1: Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's it. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. Speaker 0: They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on Speaker 1: that now where people have proven that they've Speaker 0: drinking methylene blue and stuff Speaker 1: like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It was a textile dye, and now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange Speaker 1: Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?
NicHulscher
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 3:18 PM
Saved - March 9, 2026 at 11:03 PM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Mel Gibson isn't lying... A recent study documented COMPLETE REMISSION of Stage IV cancers using fenbendazole. Patients with advanced melanoma, breast, and prostate cancer saw their tumors disappear — without chemotherapy. Clinical trials must be launched immediately. https://t.co/f1J0Ot7crt

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

Mel Gibson: "I have 3 friends. All 3 of them had stage 4 cancer…and all 3 of them…don't have cancer right now at all…" Joe Rogan: "What did they take…? Ivermectin and Fenbendazole…" Mel Gibson nods in agreement. https://t.co/Flk7b6qBFW

USBornNRaised
Posted - September 25, 2023 at 3:01 AM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 11:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Extensive research by James O'Keefe revealed that our government, through DARPA, knew in early 2020 that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and interferon were effective against Covid-19. These treatments cured the virus. O'Keefe's findings were posted online, but his account got suspended, possibly due to Fauci's daughter's involvement. You can request the same information through a FOIA.

@USBornNRaised - Tired of being politically correct

So, there was a nice man named James Okeefe @OKeefeMedia who did extensive research and got a FOIA request to see what our government knew about Covid and the mRNA vaccine. He received the documents, posted them online and his account was suspended. I guess Fauci's daughter working for old Twitter had something to do with it. What did he find you may ask? Well, he found out our government aka DARPA knew way back in early 2020 that Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and interferon were curative against Covid-19. This means they cured covid. You can request the same information via a FOIA.

VigilantFox
Posted - October 27, 2023 at 5:20 PM
Saved - October 27, 2023 at 9:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko, a courageous doctor in New York City, discovered the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc in treating COVID patients. Despite Governor Cuomo's ban on the drug, Dr. Zelenko's "Zelenko Protocol" achieved a remarkable 99.96% survival rate among 7,000 patients. He then shared an over-the-counter treatment called Z-Stack, which he believed was the "cure to tyranny." Dr. Zelenko's impact on society and his role as a truth-teller cannot be overstated. He correctly concluded five crucial things before most others.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

THREAD: Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko was more than a doctor; he was a divinely-inspired person. And his fearless, unapologetic way of truth-telling had a profound impact on the world. During COVID, at the hard-hit epicenter of New York City, Dr. Zelenko boldly treated patients on the front lines. While doing so, he discovered the power of hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc. This drug combo became an essential part of what came to be known as the “Zelenko Protocol,” which resulted in an impressive 99.96% survival rate among the 7,000 COVID patients Dr. Zelenko’s team treated, markedly surpassing the efficacy of the so-called vaccines. However, Governor Cuomo placed a ban on hydroxychloroquine, and Dr. Zelenko and his team no longer had access to this life-saving drug. Undeterred, he open-sourced an over-the-counter treatment protocol, also known as Z-Stack, to the world — which he called “the cure to tyranny.” The number of lives saved and the tremendous good Dr. Zelenko did for society cannot be overstated. But what also can not be overstated is Dr. Zelenko’s role as a bonafide truth-teller before he passed away on June 30, 2022. Here are five things the good doctor (@ZelenkoZev) concluded correctly before nearly everyone else did.

View Full Interactive Feed