reSee.it - Related Post Feed

apocalypseos
Posted - April 28, 2022 at 7:06 AM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 1:45 PM

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Donbass did not join with the revolutionary gov't that conducted the coup of 2014. Ukraine had massed this enormous army to attack Donbass. Russia was forced to go in to preempt that planned attack by Ukraine. ” — Col. Richard Black (Video Clip 13) https://t.co/84e1by0qxl https://t.co/aZQjp56g8x

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Donbas region, adjacent to Russia, did not align with the revolutionary government that took power in Ukraine in 2014. Instead, it declared independence, prompting Ukraine to mobilize a large army against it. In response, Russia intervened to prevent Ukraine's planned attack, hoping to minimize casualties among Ukrainians, whom they view as brother Slavs. A notable incident involved civilians blocking a Russian tank, demonstrating a level of restraint in the Russian military's engagement rules. This contrasts with typical military responses, where tanks would not stop for civilians. The cautious approach of the Russians reflects their desire to maintain good relations with Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the Donbas is adjacent to Russia. It is a a portion of Ukraine that did not join, with the revolutionary government that conducted the coup in 2014 and overthrew the the government of of Ukraine. They they refused to become a part of the new revolutionary, government of Ukraine and, so they they declared their independence and, Ukraine had massed this enormous army to attack against the Donbas. And so Russia was forced to go in to preempt that, that planned attack by Ukraine. And, you could see that Russia very much hoped that they could conduct this special operation without unduly causing casualties for the Ukrainians because they they they think of the Ukrainians or at least they did think of the Ukrainians as as brother Slavs, that they they wanted to have good relations. But there there was a famous picture with a a Russian tank that had been stopped by a gathering of maybe 40 civilians who just walked out in the road and blocked the road and the tanks stopped. I can tell you, in Vietnam, if we had a bunch of people who who stood in the way of an American tank going through, that tank would not have slowed down in the slightest. It wouldn't have honked the horn. It wouldn't have done anything. Wouldn't have fired a warning shot. It would have just gone on. And and, and I think that's more typical. I'm not I'm not criticizing the Americans. I I would I was there and I was fighting, and I probably would've would've driven the tanks straight through myself. But what I'm saying is that the the rules of engagement for the Russians were very, very cautious.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“President Putin made a desperate effort to stop the march towards war. He put specific written peace proposals on the table with NATO because Ukraine was massing troops to attack Donbass. NATO dismissed it.” — Col. Richard Black (Video Clip 12) https://t.co/nr6dxhyEu4 https://t.co/iC3VSWFu7a

Video Transcript AI Summary
Defense industries have grown excessively due to tax funding, but this won't change the outcome of the conflict. Russia is likely to prevail, as Ukraine is in a difficult strategic position in the east. In December 2021, Putin attempted to prevent war by proposing peace talks with NATO, but these were dismissed. As Ukraine amassed troops near the Donbas, Putin felt compelled to act first. This was not a premeditated attack; unlike historical invasions, Russia entered with limited resources, lacking the typical three-to-one advantage for attackers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of these defense industries have become tremendously bloated with with, tax dollars. I don't think it's ultimately going to change the outcome. I think that, I think that Russia will prevail. The Ukrainians are in a very awkward strategic position, in the east. If you if you look at the way that this unfolded, president Putin made a desperate effort to to stop the march towards war. Back in in December of 2021, he went so far as to put specific written proposals on the table with NATO, peace proposals to to diffuse what was coming about. Because at this point, Ukraine was massing troops to attack the Donbas. And, so he was trying to head this off. He didn't want war. And, NATO just blew it off, just dismissed it, never took it seriously, never went into serious negotiations. At that point, Putin, seeing that, that armed Ukrainians with weapons to kill Russian troops were literally on their borders decided he had to strike first. Now you could see that this was not this was not some preplanned attack. This was not like, like Hitler's attack into Poland, where the the the standard rule of thumb is that you always have a 3 to 1 advantage when you are the attacker. You have to mass 3 times as many tanks and and artillery and planes and men as the other side has. In fact, when Russia went in, they they went in sort of with what they had, what they could cobble together on short notice.
OV_Matter
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 2:38 PM
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 12:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia's involvement in the Middle East began with General Wesley Clark's revelation that the US planned to take out seven countries in five years. America deceived the world about WMDs, supported ISIS, and orchestrated a coup in Ukraine. In 2014, Russia intervened in Syria to protect Christians from ISIS, prompting the US to withdraw. However, a mistaken airstrike on Syrian army personnel caused embarrassment. Obama then focused on Ukraine, staging a coup. The US and NATO's actions in the Middle East and Ukraine have heightened tensions with Russia.

@OV_Matter - 🇦🇺OurVoicesMatter

Yep Check out my analysis of Russia and the Middle East below Let’s start with Right video General Wesley Clark (After 9/11) We're going to take-out 7 countries in 5 years. Iraq Syria Lebanon Libya Somalia Sudan Iran America deceived the world about WMDs and causing the deaths of millions of Iraqis. They've supported and "accidentally dropped" weapons to ISIS locations, toppled numerous leaders in the name of democracy, and most recently orchestrated a coup in 2014 to remove the democratically elected leader of Ukraine, replacing him with a "WEF puppet. The war with US+NATO and Russia officially started back in 2014, not 2022 In Syria, a situation unfolded as Christians faced persecution and brutal killings at the hands of ISIS in 2014. Recognising the severity of the crisis, the Syrian president sought assistance from Russia. In response, Russia intervened and urged the United States to step back, which occurred in 2014. Facing limited options, the US reluctantly complied and withdrew its involvement. However, before their retreat, the US authorities directed the Australian Airforce to target what they believed to be ISIS locations. The area turned out to be occupied by the Syrian army . This error led to the loss of over 100 Syrian Army personnel lives, creating a significant embarrassment for then-President Obama and the Australian Government In the aftermath of this incident, President Obama shifted his attention and priorities towards Ukraine. Obama proceeded with staging a coup of the democratically elected leader. The 2014 coup in Kyiv, which overthrew the President Viktor Yanukovych. This coup was openly supported by US and European imperialism and implemented primarily by neo-Nazi Svoboda Party. After the 2014 coup in Kyiv, the people of the peninsula voted in a referendum to re-join Russia, a decision that most NATO members have not recognised. (Left Video) The US and the NATO war machine has wreaked havoc in the Middle East and inched closer to the east, right next to Russia, by deliberately provoking Ukraine to join NATO. With five expansions since the Cold War, Putin views this as a substantial threat, much like the rest of the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've seen five waves of NATO expansion, with military bases and attack systems now deployed in Romania and Poland. Ukraine is also being considered for NATO membership. We didn't threaten anyone; they came to our borders. Instead of treating Russia as a potential ally and building trust, they kept breaking us up and expanding NATO to the East. We expressed our concerns, but they didn't care. We prioritize our own security.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Became of that. They fooled us. We've seen 5 waves of NATO expansion. Now they're in Romania and in Poland, and they're deploying the relevant attack systems over there. That's what we're talking about. You should finally understand, we're not threatening anyone. We did not come to the US borders or to the UK borders. No. They they came to our borders, and now they're saying that Ukraine will also join NATO, and they will deploy their systems there, or not just NATO. They will simply deploy it on a bilateral basis. They will deploy their military bases and their attack systems. That's what we're talking about. Why did you have to do that? You should have done something different. Perhaps treat Russia as a possible ally and strengthen trust it. But no. Instead, you try to keep breaking us up. And then you started the NATO expansion to the East. We were saying, don't do that. You had promised you wouldn't. And they say, Where is it put in written form? Nowhere. Well, then, that's often we don't care about your concerns. And every time we just kept responding and trying to make obstacles. We were expressing our concerns about that, but they say no. They're doing whatever you want about your concerns. We will do whatever we need. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. We witnessed 5 ways of NATO expansion. Why can't they understand? What is unclear? I believe everything is clear. We are thinking about our own security.
OV_Matter
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 3:24 PM
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 6:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US Proxy war with Russia began in 2014, not 2022. It involved deceptive tactics, toppling leaders, and supporting ISIS. In Syria, Russia intervened to protect Christians from ISIS, prompting the US to withdraw. A mistaken airstrike on Syrian army by Australia caused embarrassment. Obama then focused on Ukraine, staging a coup and provoking tensions. Crimea voted to rejoin Russia, unrecognized by NATO. Putin sees NATO expansion as a major threat. The US and NATO's actions have caused havoc in the Middle East and heightened tensions with Russia.

@OV_Matter - 🇦🇺🇱🇧OurVoicesMatter

Yep Check out my analysis of the US Proxy war with Russia, featuring Ukraine and the Middle East below 👇 Let’s start with 🎥Right video General Wesley Clark (After 9/11) We're going to take-out 7 countries in 5 years. 🇮🇶Iraq 🇸🇾Syria 🇱🇧Lebanon 🇱🇾Libya 🇸🇴Somalia 🇸🇩Sudan 🇮🇷Iran 🇮🇶America deceived the world about WMDs and causing the deaths of millions of Iraqis. They've supported and "accidentally dropped" weapons to ISIS locations, toppled numerous leaders in the name of democracy, and most recently orchestrated a coup in 2014 to remove the democratically elected leader of Ukraine, replacing him with a "WEF puppet. 🏁The war with US+NATO and Russia officially started back in 2014, not 2022 🇸🇾In Syria, a situation unfolded as Christians faced persecution and brutal killings at the hands of ISIS in 2014. Recognising the severity of the crisis, the Syrian president sought assistance from Russia. In response, Russia intervened and urged the United States to step back, which occurred in 2014. Facing limited options, the US reluctantly complied and withdrew its involvement. 🇦🇺However, before their retreat, the US authorities directed the Australian Airforce to target what they believed to be ISIS locations. The area turned out to be occupied by the Syrian army 😡. This error led to the loss of over 100 Syrian Army personnel lives, creating a significant embarrassment for then-President Obama and the Australian Government 🇺🇸In the aftermath of this incident, President Obama shifted his attention and priorities towards Ukraine. Obama proceeded with staging a coup of the democratically elected leader. 🇺🇦The 2014 coup in Kyiv, which overthrew the President Viktor Yanukovych. This coup was openly supported by US and European imperialism and implemented primarily by neo-Nazi Svoboda Party. 🇷🇺After the 2014 coup in Kyiv, the people of the peninsula voted in a referendum to re-join Russia, a decision that most NATO members have not recognised. 🎥(Left Video) The US and the NATO war machine has wreaked havoc in the Middle East and inched closer to the east, right next to Russia, by deliberately provoking Ukraine to join NATO. With five expansions since the Cold War, Putin views this as a substantial threat, much like the rest of the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've seen 5 waves of NATO expansion, with military bases and attack systems now in Romania and Poland. Ukraine may also join NATO, further increasing their presence. We didn't threaten anyone, they came to our borders. Instead of treating Russia as a possible ally, they kept breaking us up and expanding NATO to the East. We expressed our concerns, but they don't care. We prioritize our own security.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Came of that. They fooled us. We've seen 5 waves of NATO expansion. Now they're in Romania and in Poland, and they're deploying the relevant attack systems over there. That's what we're talking about. You should finally understand we're not threatening anyone. We did not come to the US borders or to the UK borders. No. They they came to our borders, and now they're saying that Ukraine will also join NATO, and they will deploy their systems there. Or not just NATO, they will simply deploy it on a bilateral basis. They will deploy their military bases and their tax systems. That's what we're talking about. Why did you have to do that? You should have done something different. Perhaps treat Russia a possible ally and strength and trust. But no. Instead, you tried to keep breaking us up. And then you started the NATO expansion to the East who were saying, don't do that. You had promised you wouldn't. And they say, where is it put in written form? Nowhere. Well, then, laugh off and we don't care about your concerns. And every time we The capital responding and trying to make obstacles. We're expressing our concerns about that. But they say no. You can do whatever you want about your concerns. We'll do whatever we need. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. We witnessed 5 ways of NATO Why can't they understand? What if it's unclear? I believe everything is clear. We are thinking about our own security.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shortly after 9/11, the speaker encountered Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz at the Pentagon. A general called him urgently, revealing that they had decided to go to war with Iraq. When asked why, the general admitted they didn't have any new evidence connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda. The decision was made because they didn't know what else to do about terrorism and believed their military could overthrow governments. Weeks later, the speaker asked if they were still going to war with Iraq, to which the general responded that it was even worse. He showed the speaker a classified memo outlining plans to attack seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and ending with Iran. The speaker regrets not seeing the memo and asks for the general's name.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right after 911 about 10 days after 911, I went through the Pentagon and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and and deputy secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, sir, you got to come in. You gotta come in and talk to me a second. I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no. No. He says, we've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about the 20th September. I said, we're going to war with Iraq. Why? He said, I don't know. He said, I guess they don't know what else to do. So, I said, well, did they find some information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said, no. No. He says there's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists but we got a good military and we can take down governments. And, he said, I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. So I came back to see him a few weeks later. And by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said he reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper and he said I just he said I just got this down from upstairs, meaning the secretary of defense office today. And he said this is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out 7 countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off, Iran. I said, is it classified? He said, yes, sir. I said I said, well, don't show it to me. And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, you remember that? He said, sorry I didn't show you that memo. I didn't show it to you. I'm sorry. What did you say his name was?
Mylovanov
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 11:09 PM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 7:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin's year-end address is filled with lies and propaganda. He blames the West for the conflict in Ukraine, but even if there was a coup in 2014, it doesn't justify Russia's invasion. Russia's actions to protect pro-Russian populations are not justified, as there are legal avenues to address rights violations. Putin's claims about shelling in Donbas are false, as the conflict started with Russian intervention. Russia's goals in Ukraine do not justify military force. Putin's defense of "demilitarization" is overshadowed by the cost in Russian lives. Russia's arrogance and refusal to compromise will lead to its demise. Putin's description of the conflict as a civil war between brothers is misleading. Russians and Ukrainians have different cultures and values. Russia may weather sanctions, but there are limits to its resilience. The war will end, war criminals will be prosecuted, and international law will be restored.

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Putin tells lies, half-truths, and fantasies at his year-end address. This is propaganda, but it works. So, we must resist and refute each point Here is what he said about Ukraine and the West and why it's wrong 1. Putin blames the West for the war in 2014 and 2022 1/ https://t.co/1ho5T45t1x

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Putin: How did the conflict in Ukraine begin? It began with the state coup in Ukraine in 2014 Let's stop right here. Even if it were a coup in 2014, Russia or Putin has no right to invade and annex any territories. The international law doesn't allow it 2/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

There is the principle of non-intervention. It grants every sovereign State the right of to conduct its affairs without outside interference But of course 2014 wasn't a coup. Pro-Russian president Yanukovych rejected aspirations of Ukrainians to move towards Europe. 3/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Protests followed. Yanukovych ordered to shoot protestors and things unravelled. He fled Ukraine to Russia. Russia invaded and annexed Crimea, then invaded Donbas 4/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

2. Putin claims Russia's actions are justified to protect pro-Russian populations in eastern Ukraine that have suffered for 8 years No, they are not. Even the rights of some part of the population were violated by the government, there are courts, international law, and the UN /

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Violation of any rights of any people doesn't provide Russia or any other country with an excuse to invade another country. 6/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Putin says: They spent eight years shelling Donbas. They forced us to take these actions No, no one shelled anyone in Donbas until Russians appeared there. They started taking over the government buildings, arresting the government officials, shooting people who resisted 7/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Then, the "separatists" somehow got tanks and artillery (from Russia) and the war started. Most of the shelling and shooting happened in 2014-2015, when Russia military and Russian supported irregular militia were fighting Ukrainian regular army. 8/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

3. Putin denies Russia is seeking to encroach on others "We are not creating any blocs. And our friendship is not directed against third countries – it is aimed at benefiting ourselves, but not at harming anyone." 9/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

No one cares if you are creating any blocs or not. What I and others care about is that you use Iranian drones to shoot at my city everyday and that these drones and technology kill my friends 10/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

4. Putin defends the ongoing "special military operation" to achieve Russia's goals of "denazification, demilitarization and neutral status" for Ukraine Putin and Russia can have any goals they want, but they have no right to use military force to achieve them. 11/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

5. Putin claims Russia is successfully "demilitarizing" Ukraine by destroying large numbers of Western-supplied weapons. "We have also destroyed almost 2,300 armoured vehicles of various types. This is what is called demilitarisation." 12/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

I don't know if these numbers are accurate, but the cost of this "demilitarization" is "depopulation of Russia". Putin decision to invade Ukraine has killed over 300 000 Russians according to the US intelligence estimated declassified this week. The loss of tanks is over 2K too /

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

6. Putin warns that Western military aid to Ukraine may end one day: "everything they get is a freebie, and I apologise for such talk. But these freebies may end one day" 13/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

It is true that currently the allies are having a tough time getting its act together. But democracies are stronger than autocracies and while the political process is slow and painful, things will get through If Russia starts winning, the West will mobilize again 14/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

In any case, Russian economy and military is no match to NATO and the West. Putin is delusional trying to argue that Russia is stronger 15/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

7. Putin indicates Russia will dictate the terms of any settlement, not compromise. There is nothing new here. Russia doesn't want to compromise. Most people understand it for now. And this Russian arrogance is the source of its demise. 16/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

8. Putin rules out any second mobilization of troops "So what do we need mobilisation for? There is absolutely no need for it today." To me this speaks of a political vulnerability. Remember that 15K killed in Afghanistan plus the arms race brought the Soviet Union down. 17/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Russia has already lost 300K people in Ukraine and is sanctioned. And Russia today is no match to the USSR. It might have already lost and even dissolved, but we just simply don't know it yet. It is like cancer - it will take time to work its way through. 18/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

9. Putin describes the conflict as a "civil war between brothers", indicating Ukraine should reconcile with Russian domination. "Russians and Ukrainians are essentially one people. What is happening now is an immense tragedy; it is like a civil war between brothers" 19/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

First of all, it is a man made tragedy. This man is Putin. And no Russians and Ukrainians are not the same people. We have different cultures. Russian culture is to tolerate, respect, and obey a cruel tsar. Ukrainian culture is that of freedom and challenge to authority 20/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

Russia values the glory of state above the freedom of a human. Ukraine values exactly the opposite. 21/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

10. Putin presents a defiant message that Russia is weathering sanctions and Ukraine cannot defeat it militarily with Western help. "Our main objective is to strengthen sovereignty... economic security and sovereignty... and the growing capability of our security component." 22/

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

it is true that sanctions have limited effect and Russia has sufficient resources to continue to fight the war. It is also a scandal that the world continue to trade with Russia paying it 100s of billions enabling the war. But there are limits to the resilience of their economy /

@Mylovanov - Tymofiy Mylovanov

One day the war will be over, Ukraine will be peaceful, and the future generations of Russians will be ashamed of the atrocities their parents have committed. The world will prosecute war criminals and the international law will be restored. Let's make it happens sooner! X

DravenNoctis
Posted - February 9, 2024 at 2:19 AM
Saved - February 9, 2024 at 10:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just finished watching the Tucker/Putin interview and it was refreshing to hear Putin speak at length. He showcased his extensive knowledge of Eastern European history and explained that Ukraine is not technically a sovereign country, but rather allowed to exist independently by Russia and Poland. Putin emphasized the threat of Nazism in Ukraine and how it poses a danger to Russia, considering the millions of Russians who died fighting against the Nazis. He also discussed the 2014 coup in Ukraine, orchestrated by the CIA and the West, which led to the rise of a neo-Nazi regime. Putin highlighted the broken promises of not expanding NATO further onto Russia and the preparations for NATO bases in Ukraine. He mentioned the ongoing conflict and the need for action to protect Russians living in Ukraine. The interview covered topics such as the economy, BRICS, Orthodox Christian beliefs, and even the imprisoned American reporter. This interview provides an opportunity for Westerners to hear Putin's perspective uncensored by the mainstream media.

@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven

I finished the Tucker/Putin interview and I must admit, I never grow tired of hearing Putin speak. It is refreshing to see a leader who obviously makes his own decisions able to speak and explain them. In the west you will never see a president or any leader for that matter give an interview for over two hours and still do most of the speaking. Western leaders are usually highly unqualified and don't know enough about their area to speak for long, read from scripts or if they do seem competent they are usually lying so they keep questions and interviews short on purpose, so this was refreshing. In summary, Putin revealed he has a very encyclopedia like knowledge of Eastern European history while explaining that technically Ukraine isn't even a sovereign country but more allowed to exist independently by Russia and Poland. This explains of course why Ukrainians and Russians share not only a language but much more. It was a long winded history lesson but important for western audiences to see so that they understand that Russia is not invading Ukraine but instead keeping NATO from expanding on its borders and rooting out Nazism that was being cultivated and nurtured by the west so that the west could turn it against Russia via proxy wars. Putin also explained why the Nazism that makes up a large part of Ukrainian culture is a threat to Russia and not simply a belief system Russia wishes to control. Common sense dictates that over 30 million Russians died fighting to defeat the Nazis, so of course allowing Nazi culture and society to spring up literally next door is dangerous and sensitive for Russians. Pair that with the fact that the US and west are all too happy to take the Nazis in Ukraine and point that rage and anger at Russia and you have yet another reason for the SMO. Ultimately Putin echoed what most of us already know, that Ukraine had been fine and peaceful on its own for many years up until the 2014 coup instigated by the CIA and collective west to install Ukrainian leadership who would better play ball with western interests. Unfortunately that new leadership would be the neo-nazi regime we know today that Russia fights against. From 2014, 2016 and on the new Ukrainian leadership would begin to punish and purge Russians living in Ukraine by violent and deadly means. This was also explained in depth by Putin to Tucker along with the many promises the west and its various leaders made to Putin and Russia that they would NOT expand NATO further onto Russia. However the once peaceful Ukraine had now begun preparing to receive NATO bases and was already receiving training. What was taking place was the west was building an army, a proxy NATO army. Between training, arming and cultivating the Nazi ideology they would have all they needed to launch their attack at Russia 🇷🇺 A last ditch effort for peace was made with the infamous peace deal that both sides had agreed upon. Boris Johnson however, came to Kiev and convinced Zelensky to tear up the agreement and stand against Russia. Thus between the cries for help by Russians being murdered by the UAF and the reality of NATO but a stones throw from Russian borders Russia knew action was needed and the SMO began and continues. Putin also talked in depth about economy, about BRICS and the Orthodox Christian beliefs. Tucker tried to talk to putin about the imprisoned American reporter as well and Putin agreed to wanting to find a solution for this. It was a much needed interview that would at long last allow westerners and Americans to hear Putin in his own words without being censored and filtered by the owned and controlled western mainstream media. I do not think this interview will change courses already charted or change events to come but at least it allows people to hear both sides of a very complicated issue. All in all, I'd highly recommend people watch it. #UkraineRussianWar #ukraine #russia #Zelensky #putin #nato #TuckerCarlson #PutinInterview

YukonStrong
Posted - February 9, 2024 at 3:14 AM
Saved - February 9, 2024 at 3:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin's interview with Tucker Carlson reveals his perspective on the Ukraine conflict, history, and global politics. He criticizes NATO's rejection of Russian cooperation and expansion, blames the CIA for the 2014 coup in Ukraine, and sees Ukraine's invitation to join NATO as a direct threat. Putin claims no territorial aspirations outside of Ukraine and calls for the "De-Nazification" of Ukraine to end the war. He discusses the Nord Stream pipeline, the US dollar's abuse as a foreign policy tool, and the need for global security and cooperation. Putin believes the global economy is shifting away from the US due to aggression, sanctions, and currency control. He mentions the dangers of AI, genetic enhancements, and the need for international treaties. Putin suggests releasing a WSJ reporter as a gesture of goodwill but accuses him of espionage. He sees Ukraine as a US satellite state and blames NATO, Europe, and the West for aggression. The author concludes that Putin enjoys defying NATO and criticizes Canada's reliance on the US, Western support for the Ukraine war, and the push for digital currency. They view China as a global threat and advocate for cutting ties and out-innovating them. The author advises preparing for the worst and calls for immediate changes in culture to avoid downfall.

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

A 🇨🇦 perspective on Putin’s #TuckerCarlson Interview Putin started off with a story of deep historical and cultural knowledge of Ukraine, however as I am of Ukrainian descent myself I noticed he conveniently left out Holodomor. This was a brutal starvation and socialist re-education of Ukrainians just prior to WWII by Stalin, which was overshadowed by the holocaust and events of WWII, even though it was an equally brutal genocide. To me this was a red flag that his account of history was not entirely honest, and certainly one sided. One thing that separates Holodomor from other genocides is that is was done purely in the name of the communist ideal, not territorial, religious or racial division. It was an ideological persecution, the same type we see from Trudeau and the #woke authoritarians in North America. Join the socialist ideal …or else. In his time as president, Putin expressed he felt US Presidential will was repeatedly undermined by US administrative will (the swamp) in his face to face negotiations with multiple US presidents. It seems to me Putin is in a position of advantage diplomatically due to dealing with multiple negotiations and administrations, learning from mistakes and gaining experience over the years whereas every new president is starting out more or less from scratch. In Putin’s eyes the war was not started in 2022, but an attempt to end a war which was initiated by the CIA and NATO. Ukraine’s invasion is a response to repeated rejection of Russia peace initiatives after the fall of the USSR, and NATO’s promise not to expand eastward which was broken 5 times with expansions eastward. This was brought to a head by the CIA initiated coup of Ukraine in 2014 and the military fallout in the Donbas region, and finally triggered by Ukraine’s invitation to join NATO on 2022 forcing Putin’s invasion. In short, Putin sees NATO as repeatedly rejecting Russian attempts at co-operation, followed by NATO claiming territory which is in his view is both historically and culturally Russian, suddenly becoming a NATO member state and posing a direct threat to Russia. I also infer he felt USA was weak under Biden and it was Russia’s first chance to respond from the primary aggression that occured in 2014. Putin claimed he has no territorial aspirations outside of Ukraine, and in order for him to consider an end to the war if will require the “De-Nazification” of Ukraine. Embarrassingly, the Canadian liberal govt has antagonized the situation with their incompetence and attempts at virtue signalling via the invitation of Yaroslav Hunka to Canadian parliament and the stupidity of our politicians to applaud him. He cited this blunder as a recent provocation and example of whY Neo-Naziism needs to be eliminated within Ukraine. Canada must to get rid of Trudeau. With respect to Nordtsream he says responsibility lies with someone who had the will and submarine capability to blew it up. (USA) and claims there is an alternate route for gas to be supplied to Germany from Russia through Poland, Putin is willing to help germany out, but Ukraine refuses to allow Germany to regain energy stability. Putin says the worlds security should be shared and is not meant for the “golden billion” and that is the only scenario the world could become stable, sustainable, and predictable and the world is going through a period of severe disease. Putin then pointed to the US dollar as a tool for foriegn policy abuse as one of the biggest mistakes of US political leadership. By freezing assets and restricting Russia’s transactions they have driven Russia to embrace the yuan, and scared other nations into downsizing their US reserve funds. He alluded to Russia and China’s border to be stable and peaceful, from my perspective it seemed that it is a similar situation as the US-Canada border. Their trade has surpassed 230 billion yearly and is rich in hi tech, energy, scientific research and development

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

In regards to global economy Putin assessed as so: In 1992 the G7 was 47% and BRICS 16% In 2022 G7 is 30% and BRICS has finally surpassed it Putin claims this shift will continue due to US aggression, sanctions and currency control, while the rest of the world focuses on trade, cooperation and growth When posed with the question if a new administration could change the war in Ukraine he responded it would Come down to US foriegn policy stopping sanctions, restrictions, bombing and power abuse He touched on AI, genetic and cybernetic enhanced humans and how they will change the future forever, and as there are no current rules surrounding this fields things are growing dangerous. He alluded to the rise of the global nuclear threat being Akin to the rise of AI, genetic & other fields destroying humanity that an international treaty will be needed to prevent global destruction. When asked if he would release Even Gershkovich from the WSJ as gesture of good faith, Putin said he is open to it, but it will require good will on behalf of USA first. Putin is definitely using him as a hostage bargaining chip, but insisted he is not an innocent reporter and was in fact engaged in espionage, caught seeking classified documents in secret while working for US Special Services. When pressed on Ukraine conflict leading to larger global conflict, Putin sees Ukraine as a US satellite state and that the aggression is coming from NATO, Europe and the west and it will require Ukraine to come to the negotiation table to end the conflict. He claimed the war could have been ended 18 months ago but former UK president Johnson interfered with a Ukrainian treaty signed in Istanbul. He says there is also an element of civil war to the conflict and in some cases even Ukraine’s own troops identify as Russian, and continue to dismantle the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in solidarity.

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

After listening to his statements here are my conclusions, Putin is thoroughly enjoying the fact NATO can’t stop him and will not bend the knee to western will. He sees this all as payback for decades of foreign policy abuse by USA From a Canadian perspective I’ve never felt Canada to be so absurdly weak on the global stage. We are 100% reliant on USA for our survival, yet the USA is losing dominance every year simply due to competing nations having a larger population, bigger economies and better manufacturing. I think western support for the Ukraine war hinges on fears the world is abandoning US dollar reliance more than anything else, and ideological stupidity and naivety by the likes of the current Canadian govt and woke EU nations. I am starting to also view the push for digital currency as not just a tool for power abuse, but as a desperate last ditch effort to combat rise of the BRICS economy. Trust is waning in the US dollar and might globally. Biden’s incompetence and weakness will have decades long consequences. Trump must be elected in 2024. I also view China as the biggest threat globally, including to Putin himself. He is naive to think China is not actively undermining his nation too. I also see our social strife with respect to the #woke UN agenda driven policy, socialism, transgenderism and emasculation of North American men as direct result of Chinese influence to exploit and weaken western society. It is highly likely that China is infiltrating both the west and Russia through technology / espionage and IMO the best thing the west could do would be to completely cut ties with China and out innovate them on our own soil to regain global superiority economically and militarily. To do this 🇨🇦 and 🇺🇸 should enter into long term military, Energy, resource, manufacturing and technology initiatives to compete with BRICS nations before it’s too late. We must get both our nation’s borders and immigration under control and Instill a competitive and extremely hard work ethic in our society I also advise everyone reading this to prepare for the worst, prepare for it now and pray that war does not escalate globally. Canada’s embarrassingly reckless govt and its incredibly petty goals leave me feeling the danger to our nation to be extremely high after watching this interview Is Putin a good guy? Bad guy? I leave that to the reader but I say this with all seriousness, 🇺🇸 and 🇨🇦 are going down unless we change course immediately in almost every aspect of our culture.

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

FYI @RealAndyLeeShow @SheilaGunnReid @AndrewLawton @Yanky_Pollak my first attempt at “journalism”

ivan_8848
Posted - March 2, 2024 at 9:19 PM
Saved - September 1, 2024 at 9:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Putin will target a NATO country after defeating Ukraine, despite the argument that Ukraine needed NATO membership to avoid Russian aggression. A video I shared illustrates NATO's expansion in Europe, which I feel breaches the agreement from the Berlin Wall's fall. Understanding this context is crucial.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Putin will attack a NATO country after defeating Ukraine, but supposedly Ukraine needed to get into NATO so that Russia won't attack it. https://t.co/GmwQsNZ3qg This short video shows in chronological order the expansion of NATO in Europe in breach of the agreement signed at the time of the fall of the Berlin Wall. It’s important to see the whole picture of what got us to this situation.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

They promised NATO would not expand to the East! At the🇩🇪reunification meeting (GDR and FRG) in 1990,🇩🇪Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher told his US counterpart, James Baker, that NATO would not expand to the East. Present also is E. Schevardnadze, Soviet Foreign Minister. https://t.co/pIvSMNMQfi

Video Transcript AI Summary
**German Summary:** Im Kontext der deutschen Einheit verspricht der Westen, die NATO nicht nach Osten zu erweitern. Der damalige Außenminister der USA gibt in Washington weitreichende Zusagen. Es bestand Einigkeit darüber, dass keine Absicht bestehe, das NATO-Verteidigungsgebiet nach Osten auszudehnen. Dies beziehe sich nicht nur auf die DDR, die man nicht einverleiben wolle, sondern gelte generell. **English Translation:** In the context of German reunification, the West promised not to expand NATO eastward. The then-US Secretary of State made extensive promises in Washington. There was agreement that there was no intention to expand the NATO defense area eastward. This applied not only to the GDR, which they did not want to incorporate, but applied generally.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Im Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit verspricht der Westen, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten vorrücken zu lassen. In Washington macht der damalige Außenminister weitreichende Zusagen. Speaker 1: Wir waren uns einig, dass nicht die Absicht besteht, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet auszudehnen nach Osten. Das gilt übrigens nicht nur in Bezug auf die DDR, die wir da nicht einverleiben wollen, sondern das gilt ganz generell.
ivan_8848
Posted - March 5, 2024 at 12:33 AM
Saved - June 1, 2024 at 2:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US/NATO orchestrated the 2014 Maidan coup in Ukraine, leading to the planned Ukraine-Russian war. Putin explains that Russia warned against it, but they were ignored. The conflict was likely intentional, as it served a purpose for those involved.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine The Ukraine - Russian War Was Planned Understanding The Roots Of The Russia-Ukraine Conflict Explained By Putin https://t.co/YHodnBWoj8 Putin: We immediately said, "Guys, you can't do this, stop. No, nobody even wanted to listen. They could not fail to realise that this was a red line. We said it a thousand times. No, they did it. So here we have today's situation. And I suspect it was no accident. They needed this conflict.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the events leading up to the Ukrainian crisis, which began 10 years ago. It highlights the technical decision made by President Yanukovych to delay the signing of the Association Agreement with the European Union. The speaker emphasizes that the protests and armed opposition in Kiev were a well-prepared action, leading to a state coup. The video also mentions the involvement of Western countries and their support for the anti-constitutional coup. The speaker criticizes the lack of respect for Ukraine's sovereignty and the consequences of the conflict, including the rupture of ties between Russia and Europe.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Трудно даже поверить. С чего все началось? Хотите жить как в Париже? Хотим. Давайте подписывать. А кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконсульцион. Зачем вы раскалываете страну? Только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, но он не применил. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела Господа. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Там попробуйте, объясните фермерам во Франции, в той же Германии, в Испании, в Греции, в Португалии, в странах юга Европы, что нужно им немножко прижаться в интересах Украины. Я посмотрю на их реакцию, но только не каких-то функционеров, а вот работяг, которые на земле работают. Speaker 1: Слова, сказанные ровно 10 лет назад, кадры сделанные в очередной раз в Speaker 0: последние Speaker 1: украинский кризис перешедший в острую фазу ровно 10 лет назад теперь определяет жизни всего континента да и во многом всего мира Speaker 0: трудно даже поверить с чего все началось С технического решения Президента Януковича перенести подписание договора об ассоциации Украины с Евросоюзом. При этом речь шла даже не об отказе от этого документа, а только о переносе сроков с целью его доработки. Это было сделано, напомню, в полном соответствии с конституционными полномочиями абсолютно легитимного международно признанного главы государства Speaker 1: 8 2013 на украине серьезные экономические сложности и за помощью президент страны янукович обращается главному стратегическому партнеру россии систско-украинские переговоры принесли сегодня сенсационные новости, а события развивались следующим образом: буквально до самого последнего момента вообще не было известно, какие именно документы сегодня будут подписаны и вот за пять минут до начала церемонии нам раздали списки подписанных документов и мы увидели что 14 самым последним пунктом стоит документ под названием Дополнение к контрактам на куплю-продажу газа от января 2009 года. Speaker 0: Который дает возможность Газпрому, что он и намерен делать, продавать на Украину газ по цене 268 с половиной долларов за тысячу кубов. Сейчас эта цена около 400 долларов. Была, можно сказать. С целью поддержки бюджета Украины правительство Российской Федерации приняло решение разместить в ценных бумагах украинского правительства часть своих резервов из фонда национального благосостояния объемом 15 миллиардов долларов США. Хочу обратить Ваше внимание и хочу всех успокоить сегодня мы вообще не обсуждали вопрос о присоединении Украины к таможенному союзу. Speaker 1: Эти слова Путин говорит потому, что украинское общество тогда уже изрядно разогрета обещаниями ассоциации с евросоюзом а взаимодействие с таможенным союзом то есть с россией подается там как некий путь назад в киеве начинаются первые митинги Speaker 0: Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Speaker 1: Украина це Европа! Украина це Speaker 0: Европа! Говорят, что у украинского народа отбирают мечту, Но если посмотреть на содержание этих соглашений, то до этой мечты многие могут просто не дожить, не дотянуть. Потому что условия очень жесткие. Очень легко спекулировать на этих вопросах. Хотите жить, как в Париже? Хотим. Давайте подписывать. Кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Вы читали, что там написано? Нет. Вы читали эту бумагу? Нет. Никто же нифига не читает. Вы хоть читать-то умеете? Посмотрите, что там написано. Рынки открыть, денег нет, нормы и торговые, и технические регламенты вести европейские. Ну значит что, промышленность надо закрыть, Это выбор кого-то? Ну хорошо. Вот если всё это посчитать, взвесить, то тогда и молодые люди вполне могут разобраться в этом и сказать: Да, мы хотим европейских стандартов, но давайте это сделаем таким образом, чтобы предприятия завтра не закрылись машиностроительные, чтобы судостроение осталось на плаву, чтобы авиация не померла, чтобы космическая отрасль не сдохла. Все эти рынки и кооперация в Speaker 1: России. Эти кадры разобраны посекундно, что фиксируют действительно судьбоносные моменты. Лидеры стран Евросоюза, до этого годами рассказывавшие о демократии и праве выбора, устраивают публичную порку президенту независимой страны януковичу за принятые им решения Speaker 0: украина приостанавливает, не прекращает, а приостанавливает процесс подписания договора с Евросоюзом и хочет все, что называется, посчитать как следует. По сути, мы услышали угрозы со стороны наших европейских партнеров в отношении Украины, вплоть до способствования проведению акций протеста. Вот это и есть давление, вот это и есть шантаж. Speaker 1: Многие жители украины россии недоумевают по поводу все новых и новых кадров из Киева митинги становятся все агрессивнее в центре столицы неприкрыто начинают действовать боевики. Speaker 0: Все что сейчас происходит говорит о том что это не революция, а хорошо подготовленная акция. Эти акции, на мой взгляд, были подготовлены не к сегодняшнему дню, они готовились к президентской выборной кампании весны 2015 года. Просто это небольшой фальш-старт, но это все заготовки к президентским выборам. Хорошо подготовленные и обученные группы боевиков, на самом деле. Вы за или против подписания Украиной соглашения об ассоциации с Европейским Союзом? Мы не за и не против, это вообще не наше дело, это суверенное право украинского народа, украинского руководства, лице президента, парламента и правительства. Правительства. Если бы нам сказали, что Украина в НАТО вступает, тогда мы были бы против реально, потому что продвижение к нашим границам инфраструктуры военного блока для нас представляет опасность Speaker 1: экономические вопросы раз за разом подчеркивает путин суверенное дело украинского руководства но невозможно не учитывать серьезнейшие связи предприятия России и Украины. Speaker 0: Я бы попросил наших друзей в Брюсселе воздержаться от резких выражений, Что, нам для того, чтобы им понравиться, нужно удавить целые отраслью нашей экономики? И я бы полагал, что нужно деполитизировать эту тему, согласиться с предложением Президента Януковича и в трехстороннем формате как следует и обстоятельно на эти все темы поговорить. Speaker 1: В здании европейской комиссии на множестве телевизоров с пометкой горячая новость постоянно идут трансляции с украины январь 14 года руководство Еврокомиссии призывают януковича к сдержанности настаивает на неприменении силы против боевиков на улицах но не видит ничего странного в том что в акциях на майдане против легитимной власти участвуют высокопоставленные западные политики и Speaker 2: меньше на украина ди всем утичкима Люди на Украине, которые так мужественно вышли на улицы и провели демонстрации, вызывают у нас огромное уважение. Впечатляет сколько людей демонстрируют, что они хотят быть ближе к Европейскому Союзу в рамках закона на основе демократических процессов. Speaker 3: Все, что происходит это воплощение надежд Сирии и Украины, их жажды свободы, честных выборов и усталости от взяточничества. Я могу себе представить, как Speaker 0: бы наши европейские партнеры отреагировали, если бы в разгар кризиса, скажем, в Греции либо на Кипре на одном из митингов антиевропейских появился бы наш министр иностранных дел и начал бы обращаться с какими-то призывами. Наши друзья, европейские тоже, обратились с призывом к Президенту, к Правительству не допускать применения силы и так далее. Применение силы это всегда крайняя мера, я с ними согласен абсолютно. Но, знаете, мы сегодня в ходе беседы, я тоже об этом сказал, на Западной Украине священнослужитель призывает толпу ехать в Киев и громить правительство и дальше аргументация чтобы в нашем доме не командовали негры москали то есть русские и жиды вы знаете, это крайне удивительно, что это делает представитель религиозной деятельности а во-вторых это ведь крайнее проявление национализма абсолютно неприемлемое в цивилизованном мире и призывая украинское правительство и президент Януковича действовать цивилизованными методами мы должны обратить внимание и на его политических противников призвать и их тоже придерживаться методов цивилизованной политической борьбы Speaker 1: сейчас почему-то не принято вспоминать но вообще-то массовые беспорядки еще в январе 14 года начались не на донбассе а на западе украины винница штурм здания областной администрации и здесь и в же томире параллельно погромы в Ровно Захват административного здания в Черновцах. Драки и штурм в Черкассах. И вот уже половине страны захвачена власть донбасс тогда молчит наблюдает ждет когда по закону будет наведен порядок в россии тоже надеются на нормализации обстановки в братской стране сочи стартуют олимпийские игры которым россии готовилась долгие 7 лет. Украинские, белорусские и российские спортсмены в олимпийской деревне живут все вместе. Белорусскую сборную на Олимпиаде поддержит президент Александр лукашенко украинский лидер также приедет сочи путин проводит отдельную встречу с украинской олимпийской сборной желает спортсменам успехов Speaker 0: очень хорошая атмосфера создается болельщиками вот конечно болеет за своих но в целом очень желательно и поддерживать всех спортсменов в том числе и других команд страшно все подобрано неожиданно Speaker 1: из Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые Speaker 0: жертвы Speaker 1: С Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые жертвы с момента переворота в Киеве это первый большой публичный комментарий российского президента о произошедшем и происходящем. Speaker 0: Это антиконституционный переворот и вооруженный захват власти. А что было проще сказать в тот момент времени? Вы там переворот совершили? Нет, мы же гаранты, министр иностранных дел Польши, Франции, Германии, как гаранты подписали документ соглашение между президентом Януковичем и оппозицией. Через три дня все это растоптали. А где гаранты? Спросите у них, где они эти гаранты. Почему они не сказали: Ну-ка, пожалуйста, назад все вернитесь. Януковича верните назад! И проводите конституционные демократические выборы. Speaker 4: Я подписал это соглашение, вместе с ними поставил свою подпись, Но я не услышал от них даже слов осуждения в сторону бандитов, которые стреляли в мой кортеж, в мою охрану, и не один раз. Speaker 0: Нам все время говорили, только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, только пусть не применяет силу, но он не применил. Speaker 3: Важно также убедиться в том, что украинские военные не будут вовлечены в кризис, который должен быть разрешен гражданским обществом. Speaker 0: 21 числа вечером мне президент Обама позвонил, мы с ним обсудили эти вопросы, сказали о том, как мы будем способствовать исполнению этих договорённостей, Россия взяла на себя определённые обязательства. Я услышал, что мой американский коллега готов взять на себя определенные обязательства. Это все было 21 вечером. В тот же день мне позвонил Президент Янукович, сказал, что он подписал, считает, что ситуация стабилизировалась, и он собирается поехать в Харьков на конференцию. Не скрою, это не секрет, я выразил определенную озабоченность, сказал, возможно ли в такой ситуации покидать столицу. Он ответил, что считает возможным, поскольку есть документ, подписанный с оппозиции, и министр иностранных дел европейских стран выступили гарантами исполнения этой договоренности. Скажу вам еще больше. Я ему ответил, что я сомневаюсь в том, что все так будет хорошо, но это его дело, он же в конце концов президент, он чувствует ситуацию, ему виднее, как поступать. Во всяком случае, мне кажется, нельзя выводить силу правопорядка из Киева, сказал ему я. Он сказал: Да, конечно, это я понимаю. Уехал и дал команду вывести все силы правопорядка из Киева. Красавец Леша. Я Speaker 4: верил в порядочность иностранных посредников. Меня не просто обманули, меня цинично обманули, но не меня обманули, обманули весь украинский народ. Speaker 0: Янукович свою власть практически сдал. Он согласился на все, что требовала оппозиция. Он согласился на досрочные выборы парламента, на досрочные выборы Президента, согласился вернуться к Конституции 2004 года. Вы там Януковича успокоите, а мы успокоим оппозицию. Янукович не применил, как просили нас американцы, ни вооруженных сил, ни полиции. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела госпереворот. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Неохота здесь камеры работают, жесты определенные показывать. Вы понимаете, какие жесты мне сейчас хочется показать. Вот что они нам показали. Поняли, что окончательно свинтить Украину под себя исключительно политическими средствами не удается, совершили госпереворот, лишили нас шансов нормальным политическим образом выстраивать отношения с этой страной. Они действовали и пошли, как у нас в народе говорят, простите за моветон, по беспределу просто. Уже началась гражданская война и хаос. Кому это, зачем это надо было делать, если Янукович и так со всем согласился? Надо было пойти на выборы, и те же люди пришли бы сейчас к власти только легальным путем. Мы, как идиоты, платили бы 15 миллиардов, которые обещали, держали бы низкие цены на газ, дальше продолжали субсидировать экономику. И давайте прямо, здесь же все взрослые люди, правильно, умные, грамотные люди. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконстуционный. Что дальше? Вот смотрите, госпереворот совершили, с нами разговаривать не хотят, у нас какие мысли? Следующий шаг Украина в НАТО. Мы считаем, что с нами пытались разговаривать с помощью силы, и что мы, именно действуя в такой логике, дали адекватные ответы. Мы не создавали этого кризиса, мы были противниками такого развития событий. Не мы же там пирожки раздавали повстанцам на этот счет. Да, мы понимаем, там сложные процессы, но не таким же образом их нужно решать, причём где? Прямо у наших границ. Но вы где находитесь? За тысячи километров? А мы здесь? Это наша Земля. Вы за что хотите там бороться? Не знаете? А мы знаем, и мы на это готовы. Я бы никогда не стал этого делать, если бы не считал, что мы обязаны поступить именно таким образом. Что касается хронологии событий, то сначала произошел государственный переворот и захват власти, и вот с этого момента наши взгляды и пути с руководством Украины стали диаметрально противоположными. С этого момента мы с ними разошлись. Но после этого Крым вернулся в состав Российской Федерации, а не наоборот. Так что у нас отношения испортились с Украиной, с Крымом в принципе не связано. Мы разве какие-то операции в Крыму или где-то еще проводили с нормальной страной и с нормальной властью? Нет, никогда этого не делали, в голове даже этого не держали. Но зачем же западные страны поддержали государственный переворот? С этого момента для нас власть на Украине источник власти, госпереворот, а не воля народа. Speaker 1: Откуда вам это известно? Очень просто, Speaker 0: потому что люди, которые живут на Украине, у нас с ними тысяча совместных всяких контактов и тысяча связей И мы знаем, кто, где, когда встречался, работал с теми людьми, которые свергали Януковича, как их поддерживали, сколько платили, как готовили, на каких территориях, в каких странах и кто были эти инструкторы. Мы все знаем. Speaker 1: Вы уважаете суверенитет Украины? Speaker 0: Конечно. Но мы хотели бы, чтобы и другие страны уважали суверенитет других стран, в том числе и Украины. А уважать суверенитет это значит не допускать государственных переворотов. Это кто делал? Американские наши дружки. А европейцы, которые подписались как гаранты договоренности между властью и оппозицией, сделали вид, что вообще ничего не знают. С этого всё началось. Сейчас говорят: ну давайте об этом не будем вспоминать. Нет, будем помнить об этом всегда, потому что в этом причина, и причина в тех людях, которые способствовали этому перевороту. Но Speaker 1: даже после сотен жертв, документальных кадров кровавых побоищ, та же Меркель, и спустя годы, публично говорила: Speaker 2: Мы считаем, что украинское правительство пришло к власти демократическим путем. Speaker 0: Если мы будем вот так вот с разными стандартами подходить к одинаковым явлениям, что мы никогда ни о чем не сможем договориться. Мы должны утвердить, в конце концов, не право сильного и право кулака в международных делах, а нормы международного права. Speaker 1: -Конфликт на Украине и вокруг нее, который разгорелся ровно 10 лет назад, который сейчас поставил мир на грань третьей мировой войны, мог быть урегулирован еще тогда, в феврале 14-го. Speaker 0: Вы же сразу сказали: ребята, так нельзя, остановитесь. Нет, никто ее слушать не хотел. Они же не могли не понимать, что это красная черта, мы тысячу раз об этом сказали, нет, полезли. Вот мы получили сегодняшнюю ситуацию. Я подозреваю, что не случайно им нужен был этот конфликт. Speaker 1: В результате сша разорвали связи россии и европы разожгли вооруженный конфликт между братскими народами но и по своему положению в мире нанесли такой удар от которого некогда глобальный лидер уже вряд ли когда-либо оправиться

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Brilliant!!! The best video @0rf ‼️👏👏👏 Watch Matt Orfalea Bitch Slap Those Who Said The Ukraine Invasion Was "Not About NATO" The biggest threat in the world is NATO. NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. NATO is a military alliance that feeds on war. To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. NATO DISBAND!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin sent a treaty to NATO to stop enlargement, but war broke out in Ukraine. The conflict is not about NATO, but democracy and Putin's ambitions. Some compare Putin to Hitler. The root cause is Putin's desire for power. The situation is complex, with both sides at fault. Peace seems unlikely with Putin's actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. Speaker 1: So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's never about NATO enlargement. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO? Speaker 2: It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it has nothing to do with NATO. This is not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. This is not about NATO. Speaker 2: Seriously, it's not about NATO. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO. Speaker 3: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Speaker 2: Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. But NATO is not the reason. Speaker 1: This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Because it's a democracy. Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. It's about democracy. And it's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: This war Speaker 1: in Ukraine is not about NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It has nothing to do with NATO. Nothing to do with NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's not about Speaker 3: NATO expansion. Speaker 1: Nothing to do with with NATO. Speaker 2: It isn't really about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: It's not about NATO encroaching. Speaker 1: So it's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictitious imaginary adversary for Speaker 2: for for mister Putin and for Russia. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO. Speaker 3: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 4: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 2: He wanted us to sign Speaker 0: a promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 2: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Evil. It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. Speaker 1: It's about Putin being sick. Because I don't Speaker 2: know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. Speaker 1: People were comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. And remember Hitler? Speaker 2: He's a Hitler. Speaker 1: We're back when the the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 2: This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 4: Putin Speaker 1: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 2: This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 4: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 1: Who Hitler? This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.
ivan_8848
Posted - March 19, 2024 at 2:13 AM
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 10:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the conflict in Ukraine and the role of various actors, including NATO and the United States. The posts highlight the long-standing tensions and mistakes made by both sides. The focus is on the need for peaceful negotiations and avoiding further escalation. The posts also mention the role of propaganda and misinformation in shaping public opinion. Overall, the posts provide different perspectives on the Ukraine-Russia conflict and its underlying causes.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

MUST WATCH! ENJOY! Piers Morgan vs Jeffrey Sachs What is your view of Vladimir Putin? Well, I think he's very smart, very tough, and I think he says what he means. In 2007, he said, don't do this. At the Munich security conference, famously, he said, all right, you went violating what I know to be true, by the way, which was not an inch eastward for NATO, promised by James Baker II and by Hans-Dietrich Genscher to Gorbachev in 1990. I know that's for sure the case. The United States expanded NATO to Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic in the Clinton period, and then to seven more countries in 2004. Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania and Bulgaria. And then in 2007, Putin said, stop. All right, stop. No more. Not to Ukraine. So what does George W do in 2008? In Bucharest, of course. What does he do? He says, guarantee Ukraine and Georgia. And this is Palmerston's playbook from 1853. So we're going to surround Russia in the Black Sea again. Exactly that. Okay, just to interrupt, though, I just asked you what your view of Putin is, and so far, you've just said he's smart and tough. I told you. Any negatives, professor? I believe that the big mistake of both sides is we should talk this out. And now let me say a word about talking it out. In 2008, when Bucharest happened, european leaders called me because I'm friends with them. They said, what is your crazy president doing, by the way? Some who are in power right now, I won't name names. What is your president doing? Why is he destabilising things? He promised he wasn't going to push Ukraine. That's what european leaders say in private. They don't say it in public. We avoided the negotiations. Then 2014 came, sadly, Piers. I saw some of it firsthand. It was ugly. The United States should not be funding overthrows of governments. We did. I know it. Okay. So I happened to be there soon afterwards with the handpicked government, handpicked by Victoria Nuland. We didn't talk then. Then came the Minsk agreements. And then the United States said privately, even though the UN Security Council has backed both Minsk one and Minsk II, you don't have to do this. And so with Poroshenko. Don't worry about it. Then we heard, of course, Chancellor Merkel say afterwards, yeah, we weren't taking it too seriously, even though Germany and France were the guarantors of that. Then, on December 15, 2021, Putin put it down in a draught. US Russia security agreement. I read it. I called the White House. I said, you know what you can negotiate on this basis? Avoid the war. No. There's going to be no war. Mr. Sachs. I said, just tell them that NATO is not going to enlarge. You'll avoid the war. No, we're never going to say that. We have an open door policy. So. What kind of open door policy? We've had 200 years of the Monroe doctrine. Some open door policy? No, Mr. Sachs. Then the war breaks out. Then immediately Zelensky says, okay, we can be neutral. We can be neutral and negotiations start. As you know, Naftali Bennett, informally, the prime minister of Israel and Turkey with its very skilled diplomacy. I actually flew to Ankara to discuss with the turkish diplomats what was going on. The US stopped the agreement. Why? Because they thought we'll win. We can blade sanctions, you know, cutting them out of the banking system. We're going to bring them to their knees. It's a bunch of terrible miscalculations, is what it is. It's a game. Listen. A terrible game. I hear you. What I'm fascinated by, though, is I've asked you to say what you think of Putin. And so far, like I say, you've only called him tough and smart. This is a guy that kills his political opponents. This is a guy who. This is a guy who rules his country like a gangster. I'm struggling to understand why you can't find any negatives for the guy. He's a dictator. Because I'm trying to find peace, and you don't do it the way that Biden does. Biden said, okay, he's a thug. Biden says he's a crazy sober. That's real good, Joe. That's really getting us to where we want to go. That's hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians dead. Can you not find anything negative to say about Vladimir Putin? I don't think that what I say about Putin negative has anything to do with anything. What I'm saying is, as I know. Well, you were ready to call him smart. You're ready to call him smart and smart and tough, but you can't find anything. I wrote a book about the cuban missile crisis and its aftermath. Kennedy didn't go name calling Khrushchev. He tried to save the world to stop the war afterwards. He didn't insult Khrushchev. What he did was sat down with him and negotiated the partial nuclear test ban treaty. We're not in a game. We're not in name calling. We're not in a cage brawl. We're trying to actually not have the world spiral into nuclear war. So it's not that game. The game is sit down and negotiate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin is seen as smart and tough by the speaker, who emphasizes the need for peaceful negotiations rather than name-calling. The speaker criticizes past actions by the US and European leaders regarding Ukraine, urging for dialogue and diplomacy to prevent conflict. The focus is on avoiding war and finding peaceful solutions through negotiation, referencing historical examples like the Cuban Missile Crisis. Peaceful negotiations are emphasized over insults and aggression.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is your view of Vladimir Putin? Speaker 1: Well, I think he's very smart, very tough, and, I think he says what he means. In 2007, he said, don't do this at the Munich Security Conference famously. He said, alright. You went violating what I know to be true, by the way, which was not an inch eastward for NATO promised by James Baker the 3rd and by Hans Dietrich Dencher, to Gorbachev in 1990. I know that's for sure the case. The United States expanded NATO to Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic in, in, the Clinton period, and then to 7 more countries in 2004, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Romania, and Bulgaria. And then in 2007, Putin said, stop. Alright? Stop. No more not to Ukraine. So what does George w do in 2008 in Bucharest? Of course. What does he do? He says, guarantee Ukraine and Georgia. And, you know, this is, Palmerston's playbook from, 18 53, so we're gonna surround Russia and the Black Sea again. Exactly that. Speaker 0: Okay. But You know I don't want to interrupt. Just to interrupt, though, I just asked you what your view of Putin is. And so far, you've just said he's smart and tough. Speaker 1: I just I told you. He he he Any any negative? Clearly. Speaker 0: Any negative, professor? Speaker 1: I believe that the big mistake of both sides is we should talk this out. And now let me say a word about talking it out. In 2008, when Bucharest happened, European leaders called me because I'm friends with them. They said, what is your crazy president doing? By the way, some who are in power right now, I won't name names, what is your president doing? Why is he destabilizing things? He promised he wasn't gonna push Ukraine. That's what European leaders say in private. They don't say it in public. We avoided the negotiations. Then 2014 came. Sadly, Piers, I saw I saw some of it firsthand. It was ugly. The United States should not be funding overthrows of governments. We did. I know it. Okay. So I happened to be there soon afterwards, with the handpicked government, handpicked by Victoria Nuland. We didn't talk then. Then came the Minsk agreements. And then the United States said privately, even though the UN Security Council has backed both mince 1 and mince mince 2, you don't have to do this. And so with Poroshenko, don't worry about it. Then then we heard, of course, chancellor Merkel say afterwards, yeah, we weren't taking it too seriously even though Germany and France were the guarantors of that. Then on December 15, 2021, Putin put it down in a draft US Russia security agreement. I read it. I called the White House. I said, you know what? You can negotiate on this basis. Avoid the war. No. No. No. There's gonna be no war, mister Sachs. I said, just tell them that NATO was not going to enlarge. You'll avoid the war. No. We're never gonna say that. We have an open door policy. So what kind of open door policy? We've had 200 years of the Monroe doctrine, some open door policy. No. No. No, mister Sachs. Then the war breaks out. Then, immediately, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. We can be neutral. We can be neutral. And, negotiations start, as you know, Naftali Bennett, informally the prime minister of Israel, and the and and Turkey with its very skilled diplomacy. I actually flew to Ankara to discuss with the Turkish diplomats what was going on. The US stopped the agreement. Why? Because they thought we'll win. We can bleed Russia. Our sanctions, you know, cutting them out of the banking system, we're gonna bring them to their knees. It's a bunch of terrible miscalculations is what it is. It's a game. Speaker 0: Listen. Speaker 1: A terrible game. Speaker 0: I hear you. What I'm fascinated by, though, is I've asked you to say what you think of Putin. And so far, like I say, you've only called him tough and smart. This is a guy that kills his political opponents. This is a guy who Yeah. Speaker 1: What's the the Speaker 0: This is a guy who rules his country like a gangster. I I find it I'm struggling to understand why you can't find any negatives for the guy. He's a dictator. Speaker 1: Because I'm trying to because I'm trying to find peace, and you don't do it the way that Biden does. Biden said, okay. He's a thug. Biden says he's a crazy SOB. That's real good, Joe. That's really getting us to where we wanna go. That's 100 of 1000 of Ukrainians dead. Speaker 0: But do you know what? Can you not find can you not find anything negative to say about Vladimir Putin? Speaker 1: I don't think that what I say about Putin negative has anything to do with anything. What I'm saying is, as I know, you Speaker 0: Well, you were already calling smart you were already calling smart and tough. I'm not sure. And that's Speaker 1: You know, in in You go to smart Speaker 0: and tough, but you can't find anything bad. To say that. Speaker 1: Wrote a book about the Cuban Missile Crisis and its aftermath. Kennedy didn't go name calling Khrushchev. He tried to save the world to stop the war. Afterwards, he didn't insult Khrushchev. What he did was sat down with him and negotiated the partial nuclear test ban treaty. We're not in a game. We're not in name calling. We're not in a cage brawl. We're trying to actually not have the world spiral into nuclear war. So it's not that game. The game is sit down and negotiate.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Brilliant!!! The best video @0rf ‼️👏👏👏 Watch Matt Orfalea Bitch Slap Those Who Said The Ukraine Invasion Was "Not About NATO" The biggest threat in the world is NATO. NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. NATO is a military alliance that feeds on war. To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. NATO DISBAND!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin sent a treaty to NATO to stop enlargement, but NATO refused. The conflict isn't about NATO, but democracy in Ukraine. Some compare Putin to Hitler. The main issue is Putin's desire for influence. The war is not about NATO, but Putin's ambitions. It's a complex situation with no easy solution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. Speaker 1: So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's never about NATO enlargement. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO expanding toward Russia. This was never about NATO? It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. This is not about NATO. Seriously, it's not about Speaker 2: NATO. This was never about NATO. Speaker 3: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Yeah. He's claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. But NATO is not the reason. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Speaker 1: Because it's a democracy. Speaker 2: Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. Speaker 1: It's about democracy. And it's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 3: NATO expansion. Speaker 1: Nothing to do with with NATO. It isn't really about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, Speaker 2: it has nothing to do with NATO. It's not about NATO encroaching. So it's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictitious imaginary adversary for for for mister Putin and for Russia. It was never about NATO. Speaker 3: That's not what it's been about. It's been about him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Speaker 4: Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly, I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 1: He wanted us to sign Speaker 0: a promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 1: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Evil. It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. It's about Putin being sick. Speaker 2: Because I don't Speaker 1: know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. Speaker 2: People were comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. Speaker 1: And remember Hitler? Speaker 2: He's a Hitler. Speaker 1: We're back when the the Nazis invaded Poland. Speaker 2: This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. This is the same. Putin will not stop. Speaker 4: Putin Speaker 2: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 4: He's the new Hitler. Speaker 1: Who Hitler? This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, just not Ukraine, Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Jeffrey Sachs: Conflict in Ukraine has been a 30 year project of the United States. This has been a long standing game, announced, explained Brzezinski laid it all out for us in 1997. MasterClass for Piers Morgan ❗️ Ukraine wanted to be part of NATO and that perhaps the biggest mistake Ukraine made was to give up its nuclear weapons. Well, I think the mistake is that Ukraine should have been a neutral buffer between Russia and NATO. And that's how it started out as an independent state in 1991. And the United States had its eye on getting Ukraine into the US orbit already from 1992. Zbigniew Brzezinski spelled it out in 1997. Many people thought this was a path to disaster and it's turned out to be a path to disaster. So it's very sad. It could have been peaceful and neutral and independent, and that wasn't good enough for the United States. And I understand completely why Russia wouldn't want NATO on the 2000 km border of Ukraine and Russia. So it's just very sad, very predictable. George Kennan called it exactly in 1997. Interestingly, our current CIA director, Bill Burns, who was in 2008, the US ambassador to Russia, sent back a famous memo called Niet means Niet. No, don't do it. It's not just Putin, it's the entire political class that absolutely rejects Ukraine and NATO. And we should have been prudent, but we're not very prudent. We had our designs and we have walked into a disaster. But more than that, we talked Ukraine into a complete disaster. I mean, the other way of looking at this is that Ukraine wanted to be a sovereign, democratic country after the breakup of the Soviet Union. In fact, vast majority of people in Ukraine voted for that and that this was the complete antithesis of how Putin saw the layover of the land and he thought, no, I'm not having that. I'm going to go and grab Crimea, then I'll grab a load of Ukraine, try it in Georgia. I mean, at what point does he do this stuff where even someone who's trying to be fair minded about his intentions, like yourself, might think, I wonder if I'm right and maybe he is just a pathological liar and a homicidal maniac. Piers. The real screw up by the US was not just pushing NATO, but playing real games and participating in the overthrow of Yanukovych in February 2014. We overthrew a government and the United States played a major role in that. I happened to see some of it firsthand. Pretty ugly, but pretty standard stuff. This is what the US does when it doesn't like a government or a government standing in the way. It stirs things up. It puts in a lot of money, it funds unrest, it stokes unrest. And it did that in February 2014. That was really the huge mistake that was a gambit, a typical so called covert, but not very covert US regime change operation. And it was absolutely the path to the disaster that we're in right now. So I think the main point is you have two sides playing a lot of games. But for the United States to be pushing so hard to Russia's border was absolutely premeditated and stupid, really stupid. It got us into this mess, and you could see it coming so clearly for the last ten years. What is your view of I begged the White House many times, avoid the war, stop. Just tell them NATO is not coming, Ukraine will do just fine. And they wouldn't do it because this has been a 30 year project of the United States also. This is how it works. This has been a long standing game, announced, explained Brzezinski laid it all out for us in 1997. So we've seen it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine's decision to give up nuclear weapons and pursue NATO membership is criticized as a mistake. The US is blamed for pushing Ukraine towards NATO and overthrowing Yanukovych in 2014, leading to the current crisis. The speaker urges the White House to avoid war by reassuring Russia that NATO will not expand further. The situation is seen as a result of long-standing US foreign policy goals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine wanted to be part of NATO and that perhaps the biggest mistake Ukraine made was to give up its nuclear weapons. Speaker 1: Well, I think the mistake is that Ukraine should have been a neutral buffer between Russia and, and NATO, and that's how it started out as an independent state in 1991. The United States had its eye on getting Ukraine into the US orbit, already from 1992. Zbig Brozhinski spelled it out in 1997. Many people thought this was a path to disaster, and it's turned out to be a path to disaster. So it's very sad. It it could have been peaceful and neutral and independent, and that wasn't good enough for the United States. And, I understand completely why Russia wouldn't want NATO on the 2,000 kilometer border, of Ukraine and Russia. So it it's just very sad, very predictable. George Kennan called it exactly in 1997. Interestingly, our current CIA director, Bill Burns, who was in 2008, the US ambassador to Russia, sent back a famous memo called the means. No. Don't do it. It's not just Putin. It's the entire political class that absolutely rejects, Ukraine and NATO. And we should have been prudent, but we're not very prudent. We had our designs, and we have walked into a disaster. But more than that, we talked Ukraine into a complete disaster. Speaker 0: I I mean, the other way of looking at this is that Ukraine wanted to be a sovereign democratic country after the breakup of the Soviet Union. In fact, vast majority of people in Ukraine voted for that and that this was, the complete antithesis of how Putin saw the lay of the land. And he thought, no, I'm not having that. I'm gonna go and grab Crimea and I'll grab a load of Ukraine, try it in Georgia. I mean, at what point does he do this stuff where even someone who's trying to be fair minded about his intentions, like yourself, might think, I wonder if I'm right, and maybe he is just a pathological liar and a homicidal maniac. Speaker 1: Piers, the, the real screw up by the US was not just pushing NATO, but playing real games and participating in the overthrow of Yanukovych in overthrow of Yanukovych in February 2014, we overthrew a government, and the United States played a major role in that. I happen to see some of it firsthand. Pretty ugly, but pretty standard stuff. This is what the US does. When it doesn't like a government or a government standing in the way, it stirs things up. It puts in a lot of money. It funds unrest. It stokes unrest, and it did that in February 2014. That was really the huge mistake. That was a gambit, a typical so called covert but not very covert US regime change operation, and it was absolutely the path to the disaster that we're in right now. So I think the main point is you have two sides playing a lot of lot of games, but for the United States to be pushing so hard to Russia's border was absolutely premeditated and stupid, really stupid. It got us into this mess, and you could see it coming so clearly for the last 10 years. Speaker 0: What is your view Speaker 1: about it? The White House. Many I beg I beg the White House many times. Avoid the war. Stop. Just tell them NATO's not coming. You know, Ukraine will do just fine, and they wouldn't do it because this has been a 30 year project of the United States also. This is how it works. This has been a a long standing game, announced, explained. Brozinski laid it all out for us, in 1997. So we've seen it.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The Ukraine - Russian War was planned well in advance. The war in Ukraine will stop when it is stopped by the one who organized it, financed and continues to finance it. This war is provoked and inevitable. Zelensky is a puppet.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

OSCE Reports Reveal Ukraine Started Shelling The Donbas Nine Days Before Russia's 'Special Military Operation' The Biden Administration, U.S. political officials, and the corporate media are lying the American public into World War III. https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/osce-reports-reveal-ukraine-started

OSCE Reports Reveal Ukraine Started Shelling The Donbas Nine Days Before Russia's 'Special Military Operation' The Biden Administration, U.S. political officials, and the corporate media are lying the American public into World War III. kanekoa.news

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/rN1rg2bz2C

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine The Ukraine - Russian War Was Planned Understanding The Roots Of The Russia-Ukraine Conflict Explained By Putin https://t.co/YHodnBWoj8 Putin: We immediately said, "Guys, you can't do this, stop. No, nobody even wanted to listen. They could not fail to realise that this was a red line. We said it a thousand times. No, they did it. So here we have today's situation. And I suspect it was no accident. They needed this conflict.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the events leading up to the Ukrainian crisis 10 years ago. It highlights the technical decision made by President Yanukovych to delay the signing of the association agreement with the EU, which sparked protests in Kiev. The video also mentions the involvement of Western countries in supporting the anti-government movement and the subsequent armed opposition in Kiev. It emphasizes the impact of these events on the entire continent and the world. The transcript also includes statements from various leaders and politicians, expressing their opinions on the situation. Overall, the video suggests that the crisis could have been resolved earlier if different approaches had been taken.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Трудно даже поверить. С чего все началось? Хотите жить как в Париже? Хотим. Давайте подписывать. А кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконсульцион. Зачем вы раскалываете страну? Только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, но он не применил. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела Господа. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Там попробуйте, объясните фермерам во Франции, в той же Германии, в Испании, в Греции, в Португалии, в странах юга Европы, что нужно им немножко прижаться в интересах Украины. Я посмотрю на их реакцию, но только не каких-то функционеров, а вот работяг, которые на земле работают. Speaker 1: Слова, сказанные ровно 10 лет назад, кадры сделанные в очередной раз в Speaker 0: последние Speaker 1: украинский кризис перешедший в острую фазу ровно 10 лет назад теперь определяет жизни всего континента да и во многом всего мира Speaker 0: трудно даже поверить с чего все началось С технического решения Президента Януковича перенести подписание договора об ассоциации Украины с Евросоюзом. При этом речь шла даже не об отказе от этого документа, а только о переносе сроков с целью его доработки. Это было сделано, напомню, в полном соответствии с конституционными полномочиями абсолютно легитимного международно признанного главы государства Speaker 1: 8 2013 на украине серьезные экономические сложности и за помощью президент страны янукович обращается главному стратегическому партнеру россии систско-украинские переговоры принесли сегодня сенсационные новости, а события развивались следующим образом: буквально до самого последнего момента вообще не было известно, какие именно документы сегодня будут подписаны и вот за пять минут до начала церемонии нам раздали списки подписанных документов и мы увидели что 14 самым последним пунктом стоит документ под названием Дополнение к контрактам на куплю-продажу газа от января 2009 года. Speaker 0: Который дает возможность Газпрому, что он и намерен делать, продавать на Украину газ по цене 268 с половиной долларов за тысячу кубов. Сейчас эта цена около 400 долларов. Была, можно сказать. С целью поддержки бюджета Украины правительство Российской Федерации приняло решение разместить в ценных бумагах украинского правительства часть своих резервов из фонда национального благосостояния объемом 15 миллиардов долларов США. Хочу обратить Ваше внимание и хочу всех успокоить сегодня мы вообще не обсуждали вопрос о присоединении Украины к таможенному союзу. Speaker 1: Эти слова Путин говорит потому, что украинское общество тогда уже изрядно разогрета обещаниями ассоциации с евросоюзом а взаимодействие с таможенным союзом то есть с россией подается там как некий путь назад в киеве начинаются первые митинги Speaker 0: Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Speaker 1: Украина це Европа! Украина це Speaker 0: Европа! Говорят, что у украинского народа отбирают мечту, Но если посмотреть на содержание этих соглашений, то до этой мечты многие могут просто не дожить, не дотянуть. Потому что условия очень жесткие. Очень легко спекулировать на этих вопросах. Хотите жить, как в Париже? Хотим. Speaker 1: Давайте Speaker 0: подписывать. Кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Вы читали, что там написано? Нет. Вы читали эту бумагу? Нет. Никто же нифига не читает. Вы хоть читать-то умеете? Посмотрите, что там написано. Рынки открыть, денег нет, нормы и торговые, и технические регламенты вести европейские. Ну значит что, промышленность надо закрыть, Это выбор кого-то? Ну хорошо. Вот если всё это посчитать, взвесить, то тогда и молодые люди вполне могут разобраться в этом и сказать: Да, мы хотим европейских стандартов, но давайте это сделаем таким образом, чтобы предприятия завтра не закрылись машиностроительные, чтобы судостроение осталось на плаву, чтобы авиация не померла, чтобы космическая отрасль не сдохла. Все эти рынки и кооперация в Speaker 1: России. Эти кадры разобраны посекундно, что фиксируют действительно судьбоносные моменты. Лидеры стран Евросоюза, до этого годами рассказывавшие о демократии и праве выбора, устраивают публичную порку президенту независимой страны януковичу за принятые им решения Speaker 0: украина приостанавливает, не прекращает, а приостанавливает процесс подписания договора с Евросоюзом и хочет все, что называется, посчитать как следует. По сути, мы услышали угрозы со стороны наших европейских партнеров в отношении Украины, вплоть до способствования проведению акций протеста. Вот это и есть давление, вот это и есть шантаж. Speaker 1: Многие жители украины россии недоумевают по поводу все новых и новых кадров из Киева митинги становятся все агрессивнее в центре столицы неприкрыто начинают действовать боевики. Speaker 0: Все что сейчас происходит говорит о том что это не революция, а хорошо подготовленная акция. Эти акции, на мой взгляд, были подготовлены не к сегодняшнему дню, они готовились к президентской выборной кампании весны 2015 года. Просто это небольшой фальш-старт, но это все заготовки к президентским выборам. Хорошо подготовленные и обученные группы боевиков, на самом деле. Вы за или против подписания Украиной соглашения об ассоциации с Европейским Союзом? Мы не за и не против, это вообще не наше дело, это суверенное право украинского народа, украинского руководства, лице президента, парламента и правительства. Правительства. Если бы нам сказали, что Украина в НАТО вступает, тогда мы были бы против реально, потому что продвижение к нашим границам инфраструктуры военного блока для нас представляет опасность Speaker 1: экономические вопросы раз за разом подчеркивает путин суверенное дело украинского руководства но невозможно не учитывать серьезнейшие связи предприятия России и Украины. Speaker 0: Я бы попросил наших друзей в Брюсселе воздержаться от резких выражений, Что, нам для того, чтобы им понравиться, нужно удавить целые отраслью нашей экономики? И я бы полагал, что нужно деполитизировать эту тему, согласиться с предложением Президента Януковича и в трехстороннем формате как следует и обстоятельно на эти все темы поговорить. Speaker 1: В здании европейской комиссии на множестве телевизоров с пометкой горячая новость постоянно идут трансляции с украины январь 14 года руководство Еврокомиссии призывают януковича к сдержанности настаивает на неприменении силы против боевиков на улицах но не видит ничего странного в том что в акциях на майдане против легитимной власти участвуют высокопоставленные западные политики и Speaker 2: меньше на украина ди всем утичкима Люди на Украине, которые так мужественно вышли на улицы и провели демонстрации, вызывают у нас огромное уважение. Впечатляет сколько людей демонстрируют, что они хотят быть ближе к Европейскому Союзу в рамках закона на основе демократических процессов. Speaker 3: Все, что происходит это воплощение надежд Сирии и Украины, их жажды свободы, честных выборов и усталости от взяточничества. Я могу себе представить, как Speaker 0: бы наши европейские партнеры отреагировали, если бы в разгар кризиса, скажем, в Греции либо на Кипре на одном из митингов антиевропейских появился бы наш министр иностранных дел и начал бы обращаться с какими-то призывами. Наши друзья, европейские тоже, обратились с призывом к Президенту, к Правительству не допускать применения силы и так далее. Применение силы это всегда крайняя мера, я с ними согласен абсолютно. Но, знаете, мы сегодня в ходе беседы, я тоже об этом сказал, на Западной Украине священнослужитель призывает толпу ехать в Киев и громить правительство и дальше аргументация чтобы в нашем доме не командовали негры москали то есть русские и жиды вы знаете, это крайне удивительно, что это делает представитель религиозной деятельности а во-вторых это ведь крайнее проявление национализма абсолютно неприемлемое в цивилизованном мире и призывая украинское правительство и президент Януковича действовать цивилизованными методами мы должны обратить внимание и на его политических противников призвать и их тоже придерживаться методов цивилизованной политической борьбы Speaker 1: сейчас почему-то не принято вспоминать но вообще-то массовые беспорядки еще в январе 14 года начались не на донбассе а на западе украины винница штурм здания областной администрации и здесь и в же томире параллельно погромы в Ровно Захват административного здания в Черновцах. Драки и штурм в Черкассах. И вот уже половине страны захвачена власть донбасс тогда молчит наблюдает ждет когда по закону будет наведен порядок в россии тоже надеются на нормализации обстановки в братской стране сочи стартуют олимпийские игры которым россии готовилась долгие 7 лет. Украинские, белорусские и российские спортсмены в олимпийской деревне живут все вместе. Белорусскую сборную на Олимпиаде поддержит президент Александр лукашенко украинский лидер также приедет сочи путин проводит отдельную встречу с украинской олимпийской сборной желает спортсменам успехов Speaker 0: очень хорошая атмосфера создается болельщиками вот конечно болеет за своих но в целом очень желательно и поддерживать всех спортсменов в том числе и других команд страшно все подобрано неожиданно Speaker 1: из Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые Speaker 0: жертвы Speaker 1: С Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые жертвы с момента переворота в Киеве это первый большой публичный комментарий российского президента о произошедшем и происходящем. Speaker 0: Это антиконституционный переворот и вооруженный захват власти. А что было проще сказать в тот момент времени? Вы там переворот совершили? Нет, мы же гаранты, министр иностранных дел Польши, Франции, Германии, как гаранты подписали документ соглашение между президентом Януковичем и оппозицией. Через три дня все это растоптали. А где гаранты? Спросите у них, где они эти гаранты. Почему они не сказали: Ну-ка, пожалуйста, назад все вернитесь. Януковича верните назад! И проводите конституционные демократические выборы. Speaker 4: Я подписал это соглашение, вместе с ними поставил свою подпись, Но я не услышал от них даже слов осуждения в сторону бандитов, которые стреляли в мой кортеж, в мою охрану, и не один раз. Speaker 0: Нам все время говорили, только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, только пусть не применяет силу, но он не применил. Speaker 3: Важно также убедиться в том, что украинские военные не будут вовлечены в кризис, который должен быть разрешен гражданским обществом. Speaker 0: 21 числа вечером мне президент Обама позвонил, мы с ним обсудили эти вопросы, сказали о том, как мы будем способствовать исполнению этих договорённостей, Россия взяла на себя определённые обязательства. Я услышал, что мой американский коллега готов взять на себя определенные обязательства. Это все было 21 вечером. В тот же день мне позвонил Президент Янукович, сказал, что он подписал, считает, что ситуация стабилизировалась, и он собирается поехать в Харьков на конференцию. Не скрою, это не секрет, я выразил определенную озабоченность, сказал, возможно ли в такой ситуации покидать столицу. Он ответил, что считает возможным, поскольку есть документ, подписанный с оппозиции, и министр иностранных дел европейских стран выступили гарантами исполнения этой договоренности. Скажу вам еще больше. Я ему ответил, что я сомневаюсь в том, что все так будет хорошо, но это его дело, он же в конце концов президент, он чувствует ситуацию, ему виднее, как поступать. Во всяком случае, мне кажется, нельзя выводить силу правопорядка из Киева, сказал ему я. Он сказал: Да, конечно, это я понимаю. Уехал и дал команду вывести все силы правопорядка из Киева. Красавец Леша. Я Speaker 4: верил в порядочность иностранных посредников. Меня не просто обманули, меня цинично обманули, но не меня обманули, обманули весь украинский народ. Speaker 0: Янукович свою власть практически сдал. Он согласился на все, что требовала оппозиция. Он согласился на досрочные выборы парламента, на досрочные выборы Президента, согласился вернуться к Конституции 2004 года. Вы там Януковича успокоите, а мы успокоим оппозицию. Янукович не применил, как просили нас американцы, ни вооруженных сил, ни полиции. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела госпереворот. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Неохота здесь камеры работают, жесты определенные показывать. Вы понимаете, какие жесты мне сейчас хочется показать. Вот что они нам показали. Поняли, что окончательно свинтить Украину под себя исключительно политическими средствами не удается, совершили госпереворот, лишили нас шансов нормальным политическим образом выстраивать отношения с этой страной. Они действовали и пошли, как у нас в народе говорят, простите за моветон, по беспределу просто. Уже началась гражданская война и хаос. Кому это, зачем это надо было делать, если Янукович и так со всем согласился? Надо было пойти на выборы, и те же люди пришли бы сейчас к власти только легальным путем. Мы, как идиоты, платили бы 15 миллиардов, которые обещали, держали бы низкие цены на газ, дальше продолжали субсидировать экономику. И давайте прямо, здесь же все взрослые люди, правильно, умные, грамотные люди. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконстуционный. Что дальше? Вот смотрите, госпереворот совершили, с нами разговаривать не хотят, у нас какие мысли? Следующий шаг Украина в НАТО. Мы считаем, что с нами пытались разговаривать с помощью силы, и что мы, именно действуя в такой логике, дали адекватные ответы. Мы не создавали этого кризиса, мы были противниками такого развития событий. Не мы же там пирожки раздавали повстанцам на этот счет. Да, мы понимаем, там сложные процессы, но не таким же образом их нужно решать, причём где? Прямо у наших границ. Но вы где находитесь? За тысячи километров? А мы здесь? Это наша Земля. Вы за что хотите там бороться? Не знаете? А мы знаем, и мы на это готовы. Я бы никогда не стал этого делать, если бы не считал, что мы обязаны поступить именно таким образом. Что касается хронологии событий, то сначала произошел государственный переворот и захват власти, и вот с этого момента наши взгляды и пути с руководством Украины стали диаметрально противоположными. С этого момента мы с ними разошлись. Но после этого Крым вернулся в состав Российской Федерации, а не наоборот. Так что у нас отношения испортились с Украиной, с Крымом в принципе не связано. Мы разве какие-то операции в Крыму или где-то еще проводили с нормальной страной и с нормальной властью? Нет, никогда этого не делали, в голове даже этого не держали. Но зачем же западные страны поддержали государственный переворот? С этого момента для нас власть на Украине источник власти, госпереворот, а не воля народа. Speaker 1: Откуда вам это известно? Очень просто, Speaker 0: потому что люди, которые живут на Украине, у нас с ними тысяча совместных всяких контактов и тысяча связей И мы знаем, кто, где, когда встречался, работал с теми людьми, которые свергали Януковича, как их поддерживали, сколько платили, как готовили, на каких территориях, в каких странах и кто были эти инструкторы. Мы все знаем. Speaker 1: Вы уважаете суверенитет Украины? Speaker 0: Конечно. Но мы хотели бы, чтобы и другие страны уважали суверенитет других стран, в том числе и Украины. А уважать суверенитет это значит не допускать государственных переворотов. Это кто делал? Американские наши дружки. А европейцы, которые подписались как гаранты договоренности между властью и оппозицией, сделали вид, что вообще ничего не знают. С этого всё началось. Сейчас говорят: ну давайте об этом не будем вспоминать. Нет, будем помнить об этом всегда, потому что в этом причина, и причина в тех людях, которые способствовали этому перевороту. Но Speaker 1: даже после сотен жертв, документальных кадров кровавых побоищ, та же Меркель, и спустя годы, публично говорила: Speaker 2: Мы считаем, что украинское правительство пришло к власти демократическим путем. Speaker 0: Если мы будем вот так вот с разными стандартами подходить к одинаковым явлениям, что мы никогда ни о чем не сможем договориться. Мы должны утвердить, в конце концов, не право сильного и право кулака в международных делах, а нормы международного права. Speaker 1: -Конфликт на Украине и вокруг нее, который разгорелся ровно 10 лет назад, который сейчас поставил мир на грань третьей мировой войны, мог быть урегулирован еще тогда, в феврале 14-го. Speaker 0: Вы же сразу сказали: ребята, так нельзя, остановитесь. Нет, никто ее слушать не хотел. Они же не могли не понимать, что это красная черта, мы тысячу раз об этом сказали, нет, полезли. Вот мы получили сегодняшнюю ситуацию. Я подозреваю, что не случайно им нужен был этот конфликт. Speaker 1: В результате сша разорвали связи россии и европы разожгли вооруженный конфликт между братскими народами но и по своему положению в мире нанесли такой удар от которого некогда глобальный лидер уже вряд ли когда-либо оправиться

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/VdXEQCpDok

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

They promised NATO would not expand to the East! At the🇩🇪reunification meeting (GDR and FRG) in 1990,🇩🇪Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher told his US counterpart, James Baker, that NATO would not expand to the East. Present also is E. Schevardnadze, Soviet Foreign Minister. https://t.co/pIvSMNMQfi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The West promised not to expand NATO eastward in exchange for German reunification. The then Foreign Minister in Washington made significant commitments, stating that there was no intention to extend the defense area to the east, not just in relation to East Germany, but in general.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Im Gegenzug zur deutschen Einheit verspricht der Westen, die NATO nicht weiter nach Osten vorrücken zu lassen. In Washington macht der damalige Außenminister weitreichende Zusagen. Speaker 1: Wir waren uns einig, dass nicht die Absicht besteht, das Radioverteidigungsgebiet auszudehnen nach Osten. Das gilt übrigens nicht nur in Bezug auf die DDR, die wir da nicht einverleiben wollen, sondern das gilt ganz generell.
truthtroll_X
Posted - April 1, 2024 at 8:32 AM
Saved - August 1, 2024 at 10:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been sharing insights on the Russia-Ukraine-NATO conflict, highlighting key events and perspectives often overlooked. I discussed NATO's eastward expansion, the CIA's long-standing involvement in Ukraine, and the role of U.S. officials in the 2014 coup that led to significant violence against Russian-speaking citizens. I also touched on the implications of foreign aid, the existence of biolabs, and the broader geopolitical stakes involving globalist agendas. The narrative often presented by mainstream media doesn't capture the full complexity of this situation.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

1/17. I’ve been asked to make my Russian/Ukraine/NATO War into a THREAD 🧵 It is known that James Baker in 1990 said that NATO agreed it would not move “1 inch eastward.” Although the map below is outdated, it does show NATO expansion. See also the community note.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

“The Putin Interviews” depicts Oliver Stone and Putin discussing Ukraine joining NATO in 2017!

Video Transcript AI Summary
НАТО влияет на страны, не давая им контролировать решения. Американское влияние укрепляется в Европе, особенно восточноевропейские страны. Россия сталкивается с негативным отношением из-за кризиса на Украине, но угрозы от нее нет. Страны стремятся укрепить свою независимость и защитить национальные интересы от внешнего давления. Translation: NATO influences countries without allowing them to control decisions. American influence is strengthening in Europe, especially in Eastern European countries. Russia faces negative attitudes due to the crisis in Ukraine, but there is no threat from it. Countries aim to strengthen their independence and protect national interests from external pressure.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я вижу. И эта угроза заключается в том, что когда НАТО приходит в ту или иную страну, то, как правило, политическое руководство этой страны и население страны не могут влиять на принимаемые НАТО решения, в том числе по размещению военной инфраструктуры, не исключая, например, и постановку очень чувствительных систем вооружения, в том числе и противоракетной обороны. Сейчас происходит определенное укрепление вот этого американского влияния, в том числе и в Европе, в том числе за счет восточноевропейских стран, потому что они еще находятся в парадигме противостояния другому доминанту в виде бывшего Советского Союза, это перекладывается все на сегодняшнюю Россию, но рано или поздно это закончится. Смогли с помощью инициирования кризиса, скажем, на Украине возбудить такое отношение к России как к возможным агрессорам. Но всё-таки очень скоро всем самим понятно, что никакой угрозы со стороны России не исходит ни прибалтийским странам, ни восточноевропейским, уж ни тем более каким-то более отдаленным в Западной Европе. По мере укрепления этого понимания будет расти желание укреплять свой суверенитет и защищать свои национальные интересы, Постоянно чувствовать на себе какое-то внешнее давление, уверяю вас, это ни у кого не вызывает восторга, рано или поздно это будет иметь свой результат, и это когда-то всё равно закончится.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

3/17. The CIA have been plotting in Ukraine against Russia a long time.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨The New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built "12 Secret Spy Bases" in Ukraine, waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade. After a U.S.-supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government, CIA Director John Brennan visited Kyiv in April 2014. Shortly after, the new Ukrainian government launched an "anti-terror operation" against its Russian-speaking citizens in Eastern Ukraine. For eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 2022, Ukraine's government, with help from the CIA, relentlessly bombed Eastern Ukraine. Millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States. This is part of the story often ignored by the Western press.

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Brennan possibly traveled to Kyiv under another name, but it's unclear. US VP Biden pledged $50 million in aid to help Ukraine through the crisis. Pro-Russian separatists clashed with ultranationalists, raising civil war concerns. The US aims to support Ukraine's stability and security by providing assistance and information. Ukraine deserves to determine its future free from outside interference.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Various people have said that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, traveled possibly under another name to Kyiv. And I just wanted to know, did he travel there? Does it have anything to do Speaker 1: with this action? Just to No. It it happened only in in the, in some commands from Moscow. I don't know. So Thank you. Were you in Kyiv recently? I was in Kyiv a couple weeks ago. Yes. Mhmm. Could you tell us what your mission was? I was out there to, interact with, our Ukrainian partners and friends. Ukraine's acting president has announced the start of an anti terrorist operation in the east of the country. Today was the day Kyiv sent Is there not a grassroots movement though by Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine who are not happy with the current situation? We do have difference in my country. That's true. Every country has differences, but we are ready to bridge all this difference. Speaker 2: Easter Sunday was anything but peaceful in this corner of Eastern Ukraine. At least 2 people were killed in a gunfight near Slovians at this makeshift check point manned by pro Russian separatists. They say they were attacked by a convoy of ultranationalists called the right sector whose power base is in the west. Speaker 1: It's not clear what happened here, but this is exactly the kind of incident that can really blow this situation up into a civil war. US officials say the vice presidents in Kyiv to boost economic and political assistance to authorities there. Speaker 3: Speaking to its new pro western leaders, US vice president Joe Biden pledged to help Ukraine through the crisis, including an aid package of $50,000,000. Speaker 4: We can help in stabilizing and strengthening Ukraine's economy Speaker 5: by helping you withstand the unfair economic pressure being thrust upon you. We stand ready Speaker 6: to do that, and I say Speaker 1: ready. Ukrainian people deserve to, determine their future, again, free from outside interference, and that's what the United States is trying to do. And, to the extent that we here at CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to give them the, the information, the capabilities that they need in order to bring stability and security back to the country, we will do that.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

4/17. More on the CIA operating in Ukraine. “The first casualty of war is the truth.” What the media does not tell you…which is a lot.

@C_N_F__on__X - Conservative News Feed

If you listen to the Biden administration and pundits from the left they will tell you that Russia invaded Ukraine. The war would be over if Russia would just pack up their bags and go home. As we all know the first casualty of war is the truth. What if I told you Ukraine has been invaded long before 2022 and not by Russia? The Office For Strategic Services was the intelligence agency for the United States during World War Two. The OSS was dissolved a month after the end of the war. The war ended but the intelligence gathering and espionage was just getting started. The OSS was disbanded in 1945 but it never really went away. The CIA has been involved in clandestine activities shaping geopolitics all over the globe since its inception in 1947. The CIA has been confirmed to be responsible for disinformation campaigns, color revolutions, regime changes and assassinations. Do you really think the US had nothing to do with the Maidan Coup and the reshaping of Ukraine? #DeepState

Video Transcript AI Summary
The truth about US interference in Ukraine, dating back to WWII when CIA worked with Ukrainian Nazis, led to the rise of extremist groups like Svoboda and Right Sector. Yanukovych's refusal of IMF's offer sparked a US-backed coup orchestrated by the State Department and Joe Biden. The push for war against Russia serves globalist interests, not patriotism.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. After the war, the CIA helped Ukrainian Nazis evade the Nuremberg trials and began operating with them within the Ukraine. After decades of CIA infiltration, Speaker 1: the Ukrainian People's Movement Speaker 0: the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Svoboda, Trident, and Right Sector. Neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine. Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US state department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed Yushchenko in the 2010 elections, his government was being pressured into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer. And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych. Leaked phone calls reveal that the US state department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden. Speaker 2: Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying, you need Biden, and I said, probably tomorrow for an attaboy and to get the deeds to stick. So Biden's willing. Speaker 1: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about a coup or how they were planning to restructure the government of Ukraine. Speaker 2: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly. Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel. The very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jam.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

5/17. The Joe Biden connection in Ukraine….2014.

@ChrisToddNolan - Christopher Todd Nolan

A few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine. This relatively short video is a summary of how it really began in 2014. An unelected government began killing its "own" people in the south-east of the country after visits from Joe Biden and John Brennan.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Masters of war build guns, sparking protests turned revolution in Ukraine. Yanukovych's refusal to sign EU agreement led to his removal. Russia's involvement in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine escalated tensions. US offered support to Ukraine, condemning separatist referendums. Violent clashes ensued, with accusations of Ukrainian forces causing civilian casualties. Ceasefire ended, military actions resumed. The conflict continues, with both sides engaging in armed confrontations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Come, you masters of war. You that build up guns. Speaker 1: Is there now going to be some sort of mass public Speaker 2: protest movement? Speaker 3: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution, as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government. Speaker 2: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Yanukovych return back to Brussels and sign up agreement. Speaker 4: Good to Speaker 0: see you. We're here to come back. Would you like some bread? Speaker 4: Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. Speaker 5: The free world is with you. America is Speaker 4: with you. I am with you. It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if the if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. Speaker 6: We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. Speaker 4: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. Speaker 5: These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. Speaker 6: And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show the strength, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters. Speaker 5: So instead, they were met with snipers who picked them off one after the other. Speaker 7: From one of the upper windows of the hotel, a shock rang out. I saw the shooter. He was wearing one of the protesters' green helmets. Speaker 8: So that there is a stronger and stronger understanding that behind snipers, they were it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition. Some journalists who were with me, they saw during the day day that one member of parliament was just beat in front of parliament, pinning credit skies with the guns on the streets. Speaker 7: In special session, Ukraine's parliament voted to remove president Viktor Yanukovych. Speaker 8: Because the richest party also said, well, you will see that if the people from the eastern part of Ukraine will will really wake up and, and and and will start to demand their rights. Speaker 9: And the latest is that several 100 Russian troops, have arrived arrived at a Ukrainian military base not far from here where there is now a confrontation. Speaker 5: You just don't invade another country on phony pretext, in order to assert your interests. Speaker 10: Pro Russian demonstrators came here. They swept their way in. They even raised the Russian flag, but they've now been kicked out. The deputy mayor of this city has told the BBC that he thinks a referendum may be a chance to calm tensions here, to give pro Russian population chance to decide its own status. Speaker 11: Crimeans voted overwhelmingly on Sunday to break away from Ukraine and join Russia in a referendum the west condemned as Speaker 2: the army. Speaker 6: In Ukraine, pro Russian militants have seized a second building in the eastern city of Sloviansk, the local headquarters of the Speaker 12: state security service. Not just the police headquarters or an administration building that's occupied. Here in Sloviansk, the whole city is under control of pro Russia forces because they've got checkpoints on all Speaker 6: the entrances and access. On his Facebook page, the Ukrainian interior minister promised a very tough response. He said there's a difference between protesters and terrorists. Speaker 13: Various people have said that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, traveled possibly under another name to Kyiv. And I just wanted to know, did he travel there? Does it have anything to do with this action? Speaker 5: Just to No. It it happened only in in the in some commands from Moscow. I don't know. So Thank you. Speaker 14: Were you in Kyiv recently? Speaker 15: I was in Kyiv a couple of weeks ago. Yes. Speaker 14: Mhmm. Could you tell us what your mission was? Speaker 15: I was out there to, interact with, our Ukrainian partners and friends. Speaker 7: Ukraine's acting president has announced the start of an anti terrorist operation in the east of the country. Today was Speaker 2: the day Kyiv sent in troops Speaker 7: to try to wrest back control of the east. Speaker 2: Is there not a grassroots movement, though, by Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine who are not happy with the current situation? We do have difference in my country. That's true. Every country has differences, but we are ready to bridge all the difference. Speaker 16: Easter Sunday was anything but peaceful in this corner of Eastern Ukraine. At least 2 people were killed in a gunfight near Slovians at the snake ship's checkpoint manned by pro Russian separatists. They say they were attacked by a convoy of ultranationalists called the right sector whose power base is in the west. Speaker 17: It's not clear what happened here, but this is exactly the kind of incident that Speaker 18: could really blow this situation up into a civil war. US officials say the vice president's in Kyiv to boost economic and political assistance to authorities there. Speaker 19: Speaking to its new pro western leaders, US vice president Joe Biden pledged to help Ukraine through the crisis, including an aid package of $50,000,000. Speaker 20: We can help in stabilizing and strengthening Ukraine's economy by helping you withstand the unfair economic pressure being thrust upon you. We stand ready to do that, and I say Speaker 15: ready. Ukrainian people deserve to, determine their future. Again, free from outside interference, and that's what the United States is trying to do. And, to the extent that we here at CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to to give them the, the information, the the capabilities that they need in order to bring stability and security back to that country, we will do that. Speaker 13: So tell me, why are you here? Who are these people? Speaker 17: There was a fire in the trade union's building in Odessa where the pro Russian protesters have a base of operations. Apparently, at least 30 or in the thirties, numbers of people who died, some figures are 30 one. Other people are saying 38 people at least died, many of them from smoke inhalation and from jumping from the upper stories of the building. It's not clear exactly what started the, the the blaze, and it's not clear who exactly were was caught in the fire. But as I said, there were a number of, pro Russian protesters who was probably there. Speaker 5: We also are are very concerned about efforts of pro Russian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk, to organize, frankly, a contrived, a bogus independence referendum on May 11th. Speaker 1: Ukrainian forces knew what they wanted, and they came in force. Their assault on Mariupolsk police station sustained. Ukraine says it's a legitimate military action to evict pro Russian militias out of buildings, and many here said nothing more than the action of a fascist regime supported by the west. Rocket propelled grenades fired in city center streets, shooting where yesterday people were shopping. They've recaptured the police station alright, but in saving it, they destroyed it. Speaker 21: This is quite a statement. Ukrainian forces have now left, leaving this behind them. The point they're making, Mariupol, is one time they are not going to surrender without a plan. Speaker 22: Polling stations are being prepared across Donetsk for Sunday's referendum, a vote widely condemned as illegitimate. It's unclear what a yes result would lead to. The question is, do you support the People's Republic of Donetsk? Speaker 4: We do not recognize, the illegal referendum that took place in portions of Donetsk and Luhansk, over the weekend. It was illegal under Ukrainian law and an attempt to create further division and disorder in the country. Speaker 23: We will not recognize the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. Likewise, we do not recognize the so called referenda of yesterday. Speaker 24: So if you can't get them to talk to the table, how are you going to take back those areas that they control without the first few months of your presidency being drenched in blood? Speaker 13: Yeah. Those are helicopters now moving in on the airport. Speaker 4: The day after Ukrainian forces launched air strikes to drive separatists from the airport, Speaker 5: Donbas, Speaker 2: defend and clean and bring the peace in the Donbas, including the fighting against terror. This is the one of the main function of the state, to defend the Speaker 0: people. Speaker 3: The bloody aftermath of a strike on the separatist headquarters in the heart of Luhansk. 5 women killed, 3 men, officials say. Speaker 13: Some people were saying there was kind of there was an airstrike in Luhansk, that there was some bomb drop on the administrative headquarters of the separatists. Is it true? No. Speaker 3: The Ukrainians claim that this had nothing to do with a military aircraft which was circling overhead at the time of the attack. But from what we can tell, this looks like very heavy cannon fire from an aircraft strafing through this square. Speaker 5: No bombing, either by from airplanes or artillery were permitted by the, the, you know, leaders of the Ministry of Defense. Speaker 25: So everything that the Ukrainians are doing, I just want to understand your position correctly. Everything that they are doing is actually self defense. Correct? Speaker 26: They're I mean, look. I mean, I don't wanna use the term self defense, but this is Ukrainian territory that they are defending. Speaker 27: US president Barack Obama has offered Kyiv financial and security support during his first meeting with his newly elected Ukrainian counterpart. Speaker 0: Also, Giovanni, my dear friend. I so was together. You were fighting the sun. And when I ask you why, you raise your sticks and cry, and I follow my friend. How did you Speaker 7: These volunteers have joined the so called Azov battalion, a special force raised by the interior ministry in Kiev. Speaker 17: A few hours left until the end of the ceasefire. Speaker 21: Oh, Speaker 10: A truce ends. Within hours, military action resumes. Speaker 7: This morning, an active phase of the anti terrorist operation has been renewed. Our armed forces are launching strikes against the terrorist bases. Speaker 14: Multiple rockets hit a residential area in Western Donetsk called the Petrovsky District, killing 7 people, including 2 children. But in 4 attacks against populated areas that human rights was investigated in Donetsk, the evidence strongly indicates that Ukrainian government forces were responsible. Speaker 26: Among the dead, a female guard at the Lugansk Southern District School killed by Speaker 13: shrapnel. Speaker 0: But built it too strong. You play with my wallet like it's your little toy. You put a gun in his head, and you hide from his hands. And you turn and run farther when the basketball is fine.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

6/17. In 2014 CIA helped to overthrow Ukraine’s government and install a puppet leader. Not the first time the U.S. has done this and won’t be the last.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The 2014 CIA-supported overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected government. A Ukrainian court recently ruled that the snipers firing on Maidan protestors primarily operated from Hotel Ukraina, a location controlled by U.S.-backed extremists.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The protesters in Ukraine aim to topple the government by urging President Yanukovych to sign an association agreement with the EU. They are supported by the US and other nations. The focus is on creating a stable business environment and preventing violence against peaceful demonstrators.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government? Speaker 1: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Yanukovych return back to Brussels and sign that agreement. Speaker 2: Good to see you. We're here from America. Would you like some red Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. Speaker 1: The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you. Speaker 2: It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. Speaker 1: We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. Speaker 2: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. Speaker 1: These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show restraint, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

8/17. “Foreign Aid” in other words YOUR money.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

9/17. Yes Bio Labs did exist. The media lied. 🙄

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

I will leave you with a great documentary on who controls the world economy. BlackRock/ Vanguard and State Street are spoken about… Obviously there is much more that is not mentioned here such as the !sraeli connection and such but maybe another time….. https://rumble.com/vmyx1n-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-documentary-by-tim-gielen.html

MONOPOLY - Who owns the world? Documentary by Tim Gielen This incredibly eye opening documentary reveals something astonishing: the majority of our world is owned by the very same people. Because of this they can control the entire world and impose their wi rumble.com

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

For some reason, many of the posts in this thread got deleted by somebody? I did not get a notice or a message regarding these deletions. So I’m going to add them here again at the end. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

7/17 “2017 will be the year of offense… all of us will go back to Washington, and push the case against Russia. “

@Arsenalsgatan - moT Bombadil 🏴‍☠️

@WarClandestine

Video Transcript AI Summary
We support your fight for your homeland against Russian aggression. In 2017, we will take the case against Putin to Washington. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. We promise to bring your bravery to the American people and the world. We believe you will win, and we will provide what you need to succeed. The world is watching because we cannot let Putin succeed here, as it may lead to success in other countries.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland. Your fight is our fight. 2017 will be the year of offense. All of us will go back to Washington, and we will push the case against Russia. Enough of our Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. Our promise to you is to take your calls to Washington. Inform the American people of your bravery. And make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1: I believe you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. And we have succeeded not because of equipment but because of your courage. So I thank you, and the world is watching. And the world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here. Because if he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 1)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a war that shouldn't ever happen. It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine and us. The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors want to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why? Because then that country has to form its military purchases to NATO weapon specifications, which means certain companies, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed get a trapped market. Through March of 2022, we committed a $113,000,000,000. Just to give you an example, we could have built a home for almost every homeless person in this country. We then committed another 24,000,000,000 since that 2 months ago, and now president Biden's asking for another 60,000,000,000. But the big, big are gonna come after the war when we have to rebuild all the things that we destroyed. Mitch McConnell was asked, and we really afford to send spend a 113,000,000 to Ukraine. He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to American Defense Manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme. And who do you think owns every one of those companies? BlackRock. BlackRock. So Tim Scott, during the Republican debate, said, don't worry. It's not a gift to Ukraine. It's a loan. So raise your hand if you think that that loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah. Of course, it's not. So why do they call it a loan? Because if they call it a loan, they can impose loan conditions. And what are the loan conditions that we impose on? Number 1, of extreme austerity program so that if you're poor in Ukraine, you're gonna be poor forever. Number 2, most important, Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe. In Ukraine, there's been a 1000 years of war fought over that land. It's the richest farmland in the world. It's the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about that slown condition. They've already sold 30% of it. The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. Yeah. BlackRock. And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Accra. So they're doing this right in front of us. They don't even care that we know anymore because they know that they can get away with it. And how do they know that? Because they have a strategy. And that strategy is old, old strategy, which is they keep us at war with each other. They keep us hating on each other. They keep the Republicans and Democrats fighting each other and black against white and all these divisions that they sell.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 2)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The EPA budget is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount annually. Even after the war ends, the US plans to spend half a trillion on rebuilding Ukraine. Mitch McConnell stated that the money goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. This reveals the money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Higher budget for EPA is $12,000,000,000, so that's all we have for the environment in this country. We're giving 12 times that to Ukraine in 1 year, and that's just the beginning because even if the Ukraine war ended today, we're still gonna spend a half a trillion there rebuilding the country. The contracts to rebuild are even bigger than the war contracts. So Mitch McConnell was asked in in March because the Republicans are supposed to be concerned about budget deficits. And he said, can we really afford a $113,000,000,000 he was at? He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to US military contractors, so it's good for our country. Oh, he just admitted exactly what we've all been saying, that it's all just a money laundering scheme. A Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed. Who do you think owns every one of those countries?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 3)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia sends troops to Ukraine to ensure they won't join NATO. After a treaty is signed, Putin starts withdrawing troops, but Biden pressures Ukraine to break the agreement. As a result, many children have tragically died since then.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is their only warm water port, and they know the new government that we just installed is gonna invite the US Navy into their port. So then the Russians go in. They only send 40,000 people. It's a nation of 44,000,000 people. They clearly do not intend to conquer Ukraine, but they want us back at the negotiating table. The Russians just want a guarantee that Ukraine won't join NATO. Zelensky signs the treaty. Putin's people sign the treaty, and Putin starts withdrawing the Russian troops in good faith. And what happens? Joe Biden sends Boris Johnson, the British prime minister, over to Ukraine in April and forces him to tear up the treaty. And since then, 450 1,000 kids have died who none of them

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

11/17

@RightFight2024 - SheAin'tBlack

@truthtroll_X Would USA attack Mexico if AMLO decided to give Russia or China permission to build military bases on our Southern border? You bet your ass we would! And that's the gist of the Ukraine war.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12/17 Ukraine was (is) one of the most corrupt countries on earth. Human trafficking has been a problem, especially since the US got involved. Much like when the US got involved in Haiti, and now at its own borders with the migrant issue, human trafficking is rampant…

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12/ (Pic 2) I’m not too sure what she could offer as an ambassador?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

13/17

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

EX CIA AGENT explains why Russia 🇷🇺 cannot let Ukraine 🇺🇦 go. It would be similar to the United States 🇺🇸 letting Canada 🇨🇦 or Mexico 🇲🇽 go to Russia. It just couldn’t happen.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin is determined not to lose Ukraine due to its strategic importance for Russia's security, agriculture, and energy pipelines. The US supports Ukraine out of ideology, not economic interest, leading to a geopolitical power struggle. Ukraine becomes a pawn in a global game involving Russia, the US, Iran, and China.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Putin cannot lose. He will not let himself lose. Russia knows. They know they have to have Ukraine. They know that they have to have it to protect themselves against military pressure from the West. They have to have it for agricultural reasons. Ukraine is the agricultural bed to support a future Russia. They have major, oil and natural gas pipelines that flow through eastern Ukraine. They they cannot let Ukraine fall outside of their sphere of influence. They cannot. The United States doesn't really have any economic vested interest in Ukraine. The West siding with Ukraine is exclusively ideological, and it's putting them in a place where they fight a war with Russia so the whole world can see Russia's capabilities. As sad as it is to say, man, Ukraine is a pawn on a table for superpowers to calculate each other's capacities. Right now, we've only talked about Russia and United States. We haven't even talked about Iran. We haven't even talked about China. Right? It is a pawn on a table. This is a chicken fight so that people get to watch and see what the other trainers are

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

13 (pic 2) If Ukraine became NATO and the US figured that Putin wasn’t being a “good little boy“ the US/NATO would impose sanctions on Russia. In the grain trade alone could have devastating effects on Russian food supply.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

14/17 And for those of you who continue to watch mainstream media for whatever reason? And think you’re getting real uncensored news….

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Who do you think owns these six companies that own all the media on the planet? You guessed it….. Blackrock But the sheep all think that they’re getting uncensored news every day.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1980s, 50 companies owned 90% of American media, now just 6 major conglomerates control it all. Comcast is the largest, making $69 billion in 2014, owning NBCUniversal and Hulu. Disney follows with $48 billion revenue, owning theme parks, movie studios, and TV networks. 21st Century Fox makes $32 billion annually, focusing on film and TV, including Fox News. Time Warner lost $100 billion after a merger with AOL, now separate. CBS and Viacom were once one company controlled by National Amusements. Today, 5 conglomerates effectively control the media landscape.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the early 19 eighties, roughly 50 different companies owned 90% of American media. By 1992, that number had dropped to less than 2 dozen. And in recent years, that same 90% has fallen to just 6 major conglomerates. Although various mergers and layers of external control make this an inexact number, most of the big six hold interests in film production, cable and broadcast television, news, sports, music, and online streaming. So who exactly controls the media? As of 2015, the largest media company in the world by revenue is Comcast. According to the SEC, in 2014, they reportedly made nearly $69,000,000,000 Like the other conglomerates, Comcast owns nearly every step in media production and distribution. In fact, Comcast is the single largest cable provider on Earth. Content is created through subsidiaries like NBCUniversal, which is then broadcast over TV and the Internet through Xfinity. Comcast is also a major Internet service provider, covering more than half of all US broadband customers. Even online streaming giant, Hulu, is jointly owned by 3 of the big six. The next largest conglomerate is the Walt Disney Company, with reportedly roughly $48,000,000,000 in revenue. Disney has holdings in theme parks, movie studios, and diverse television networks such as ABC, A and E, and ESPN. They also own a number of legacy companies like Pixar, Marvel Entertainment, and Lucasfilms of the Star Wars franchise. The 3rd of the big six is 21st Century Fox, which emerged in 2013 as a spin off of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. Today, Fox makes about $32,000,000,000 a year and is predominantly focused on film and television, including Fox News Channel, which made nearly $800,000,000 in ad revenue in 2,014. The last independent conglomerate is Time Warner, with revenues of about $27,000,000,000 In the 19 nineties, they were the largest media company in the world, but an unsuccessful merger with AOL at the peak of the dotcom bubble made them lose nearly $100,000,000,000 in 2002. Since then, AOL and Time Inc, as well as Time Warner's entire cable division, have become separate companies. Because they are now unrelated, Time Warner and Time Warner Cable are the 4th and 5th largest media companies in the world, according to Forbes. Finally, the last 2 are CBS and Viacom. In 2013, they reported about 14 to $15,000,000,000 in revenue each. They used to be a single company controlled by National Amusements, a movie theater chain. Today, although they are individually held, National Amusements owners have enough stock in both to effectively dictate control. So in a way, there aren't even 6 conglomerates, but 5. You state cat You are fake news.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

14 (part 2) Blackrock – what RFK was referring to earlier and the company who owns not only the media, but the rest of the world, along with Vanguard and State Street

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Who Is Aladdin? Who controls more WEALTH than any country on earth? #LarryFink #Vanguard #Blackrock #StateStreet #Monarch #WallStreet #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #EFront #Aladdin #ShadowBank #ProjectMonarch #JoeBiden

Video Transcript AI Summary
A robot named Aladdin, created by Larry Fink of BlackRock, controls $21 trillion of the global economy. It directs major banks, investment funds, and traders, dominating ETFs, bonds, and stocks. Aladdin's influence extends to government decisions and real estate markets. With plans to expand further, concerns arise about its growing power and potential impact on wealth distribution. Larry Fink's vision of a super smart robot has evolved into a force reshaping financial landscapes worldwide.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What if I told you there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on earth? A robot so powerful that in the last 10 years, it has quietly created the biggest company in the world. This is the story of a robot called Aladdin. It's Wall Street's best kept secret, and it's gobbling up every asset class across every industry. Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. To put that in perspective, that's more than a $20,000,000,000,000 GDP of the U. S. Or the $15,000,000,000,000 GDP of the entire European Union. The new statesman wrote, the total physical cash of all 7,000,000,000 people in every company, bank vault, wallet and piggy bank in the world is around $5,000,000,000,000 Aladdin has grown into a system responsible for more than 4 times the value of all the money in the world. This one robot directs the actions of the U. S. Federal Reserve, almost every major bank and investment fund on Wall Street and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, 10% of the global stock market and carries out a quarter of a 1000000 trades every day and billions of forecasts every week. Year after year, it hoovers up trillions of data points on every market, every company, every asset and now even each of us, what we buy, sell and say so that it knows what to buy and what to sell far better than any human being. Every major bank, company and investment fund has come to rely on Aladdin and its all powerful AI and algorithms to beat the market. And if they didn't, they've collapsed and failed in Aladdin's wake. And you know what the craziest part of this story is? This robot is just getting started. So where did Aladdin come from and how did it get so powerful? Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock, and its total dominance has made his company the biggest shadow bank in the world and the most powerful company on earth. The story you're about to hear is equally unbelievable and terrifying. In fact, you would think it was science fiction if it wasn't very real and happening today. This story starts in the 1980s when Larry Fink was making 1,000,000 pioneering mortgage backed securities at Wall Street Bank First Boston. That's right. The same mortgage backed securities that caused the 2,008 global financial crisis 20 years later but back in the eighties he was in an epic wall street rivalry with luis ranieri at salomon brothers made famous as the big swinging dick in Michael Lewis's book, Lies Poker. Back then, Larry was making 1,000,000 for the bank and was on track to be first bottom CEO. And then in 1986, an error in the back office computer models led to Larry making the wrong trades and he lost the company a $100,000,000 The result was Larry leaving the bank as a failure with a stupid computer to blame. With that experience, Larry had just one ambition, to build a super smart robot that could pick out risk and opportunity in the market and do it better than any computer or human could do. In 1988, he launched a new startup BlackRock with a tiny coding team to give birth to this robot. Its name, Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In its 1st 10 years, Aladdin was fed information about every asset, price movement, and risk variable in global bond market, Larry Specialty. And in 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Aladdin was getting so intelligent at picking losers and winners that Larry began selling access to its data to other Wall Street firms. That same year, he took BlackRock public on the New York Stock Exchange. Straight after the IPO, the dotcom bust burst, pushing a wall of money from the stock market to bonds, which Aladdin had become the undisputed world champion in. Within years, BlackRock had become a $1,000,000,000,000 company. And as money started shifting back to shares, what did Larry do? He bought the asset management arm of Merrill Lynch, which was focused to shares. So the gift for Aladdin's 18th birthday, all the data points for the entire stock market. And suddenly, Aladdin had a new playground analyzing every stock trade and risk factor for every company on the stock market. As a result, today, BlackRock together with his two closest rivals Vanguard and State Street, both of which also rely on a large amount of knowledge have become the biggest shareholders of over 40% of all public listed companies in America. 2008, the global financial crisis hits and before Aladdin turns 21 years old is caught on by every Wall Street Bank and Timothy Geithner, the head of the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. As soon as Lehman Brothers collapsed and the Wall Street meltdown began, the US government came calling to save the next collapsing bank Bear Stearns. It was Aladdin who decided which assets to keep and which to leave in the $30,000,000,000 rescue package. And few people know it was a robot that saved America from disaster. With that first success, the Fed, U. S. Government and now even European and Japanese central banks began relying on Aladdin to make the course on where the $2,500,000,000,000 of new money they printed should go. The majority of it, bonds and funding to prop up the mortgage companies and banks. But wait. Aren't these exactly the assets that Aladdin and BlackRock already were invested in? Exactly. But growing protests of conflict of interest were drowned out by the noise of the printing presses a very strong quarter of the year. In the Q1, we had a strong quarter of the year, which was a strong quarter of the year. In the Q1, we had a strong quarter of With BlackRock's Barclays acquisition, it got iShares, Barclays Exchange Traded Funds Units, or ETFs. And with that, Aladdin moved from dominator of bonds and equities to dominator of ETFs, just as all the biggest investors shifted from mutual funds to ETFs. And that's when in 2017, everything changed. On Aladdin's 29th birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock code named Monarch led to the firing of his fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds. The robot was now eliminating humans from the equation altogether. And as a result, today over 70% of all trades on U. S. Stock markets are decided by robots with Aladdin leading the way. These trades are completed from beginning to end without a human involved in high frequency trading far faster than a human can execute. Now, if this was just a story about a robot taking over the job of Wall Street traders, you might not be so concerned unless you're one of those traders. But in the last 3 years, as Aladdin hit $20,000,000,000,000 in assets, incredibly, it has begun to consume and control at an even faster rate. First, in 2020, as Aladdin turned 32 years old, the US government and Federal Reserve again came calling as the pandemic hit. Aladdin was again the one to guide the nation in what was now $4,000,000,000,000 of newly printed money. Where did the money go this time? Inexplicably, for the first time, the Fed began buying ETFs in 2020. Well, that's a little strange. And again, the price of conflict of interest were drowned out by the money printing. And then Aladdin revealed its endgame. Recently, BlackRock acquired Efront, which collects data on the things that you and I own including private equity and real estate And since then, Aladdin has consumed E Fund's data on the entire global real estate market. And yet, you guess what happened next. Over the last 2 years, BlackRock and other funds using Aladdin's data have begun buying up single family homes where they can afford to outfit the rest of us as they have unlimited financing at hyper low interest rates. The result is home prices rising by 20% over the last 2 years and pushing now even big players like Zillow out of the market. And here we see Aladdin's endgame to be the 1 hyper intelligent AI robot that not just controls Wall Street assets, but all assets, public and private. Now I'm not into conspiracy theories, but even a skeptic with eyes wide open can see the signs. We're already at a point where no one can compete without Aladdin. As CEOs and asset managers like Anthony Malloway are now saying, Aladdin is like oxygen. Without it, we wouldn't be able to function. And what about government regulation? Well, Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock Executive Brian Deese as Head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Laddan and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock. And Biden has also appointed BlackRock Chief of Staff, Wally Adeyemo, to be assistant secretary of the Treasury, which means BlackRock is now the Treasury as well as the Treasury Advisor. And this story is far from over. The genie is out of the bottle and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country. But as Aladdin's AI capabilities continue to grow and with its rate of control rising by another $1,000,000,000,000 to $2,000,000,000,000 in new assets every year, it looks inevitable that Wall Street's secret weapon could end up owning everything and we end up owning nothing.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15/17 This is a video of Putin, talking about the “bureaucracy” in American politics…..The REAL people in charge. Who do you think Putin is referring to here?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary
Я общался с несколькими президентами США. Политика не меняется из-за сильной власти бюрократии. Даже Обама не смог закрыть Гуантанамо из-за сложностей. Это важный вопрос, люди там без суда десятилетиями. Не все так просто, но я остаюсь оптимистом и верю в возможность договоров по ключевым вопросам. Translation: I have spoken with several US presidents. Politics does not change due to the strong power of bureaucracy. Even Obama could not close Guantanamo due to difficulties. This is an important issue, people have been there for decades without trial. Not everything is simple, but I remain optimistic and believe in the possibility of agreements on key issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Понимаете, я уже общался и с одним президентом США, и с другим, и с третьим. Президенты приходят и уходят, а политика не меняется. Знаете почему? Потому что очень сильна власть бюрократии. Вот человека избрали, он приходит с одними идеями, к нему приходят люди с кейсами, хорошо одетые и в темных у меня костюмах, но только не с красным галстуком, а с черным или с тёмно-синим, и начинают объяснять, как нужно делать, и все сразу меняется. И это происходит от одной администрации к другой. Что-то изменить это достаточно сложное дело. Я говорю без всякой иронии, это не потому, что кому-то не хочется, а потому что это сложно. Вот Обама, он же продвинутый человек, очень человек либеральных взглядов, правда, демократ. Он же перед выборами своими обещал закрыть Гуантанамо. Сделал? Нет. А почему? Он что, не хотел? Очень хотел, я уверен, что хотел, но не получилось. Он искренне к этому стремился. Не получается, не так все просто. Но это не самый главный вопрос, хотя это важный. Трудно себе представить: Люди в кандалах ходят там уже десятилетиями, без суда и следствия. Представьте себе, Франция бы так сделала или Россия. С потрохами бы сожрали уже давно. Нет, с тем, что это возможно и до сих пор продолжается. Вот, кстати, к вопросу о демократии. Но я сейчас не для этого пример этот привел, я привел, потому что не все так просто. Но все-таки у меня есть определенная доля сдержанного оптимизма, мне кажется, что мы по ключевым вопросам можем и должны договариваться.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (pic 1)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (pic 2)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (3)

@17ThankQ - Fletch17

Maybe this is why Zelensky asked Trump to come to Ukriane again???? READ THIS CAREFULLY!!! (Working on finding article.) According to Nathaniel Rothschild, heir to the Rothschild family fortune…“Without Ukraine, the global order may not survive.” Did you catch that??? 😳😳😳 This is a RED ALERT PANIC CALL 🚨🚨🚨 to fellow globalists saying that if the Ukraine were to fall, then so would the NEW WORLD ORDER. [They] are literally BEGGING for military reinforcements from other globalist nation states to aid in “saving” Ukraine for the NWO agenda…This is incredibly telling, especially knowing about the US funded BioLabs there. Preventing next Plandemic, perhaps? He also said that Xi was a “close second” to being the “worlds most dangerous man” next to Putin. That confirms my belief regarding Xi…George Soros said the same thing. That is NOT coincidental. There should be NO more questions. It should be ABUNDANTLY CLEAR by now that Putin, and Xi are single handedly DESTROYING the NWO, and [they] are ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED about it! HT @armygir36701799

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12 (pic 3) I forgot to add this one earlier. But this is my third time doing this thread, so 🙃

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

16/17 There are quite a number of Americans living in Russia…

@ifimhome - 🇺🇸𝕴𝖋𝖎𝖒𝖍𝖔𝖒𝖊🇺🇸 𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐙𝐘 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎𝐒

𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐑 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐅𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐑 𝐕𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐍, 𝐅𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐀 🇺🇸🇷🇺 The key thing he says is "DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. FIND OUT WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE." Our media has lied to us about this since the very beginning. The media wants you to support Ukraine - but they also want you to support Hamas. Does that tell you anything? Until we get Trump back (that's IF we get him back), Putin is basically the last man standing in the way of the globalist agenda. They have a stooge in almost every other country. NATO will stop at NOTHING to topple Putin. If they get Putin cornered and to the point of desperation, what do you think will happen? Our media lies and says Putin is "bluffing" when he says nuclear war is on the table. Really? What happens when Putin has nothing left to lose? You don't think he will take as much with him as he can? Plus, I believe the globalists WANT nuclear war. This will help their stated goal - to drastically reduce the global population. That's why they're all scurrying to build themselves bunkers on tropical islands. Think about it. Slava Ukelele! 📽️Check out my many vids in my "Highlights"📽️ 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝙈𝙀 - 𝙄 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝘽𝘼𝘾𝙆💯 @ifimhome

Video Transcript AI Summary
We planted the US flag to show support for the people enduring hardships. We must end this destruction, support Russia, fulfill goals, and help those affected. I feel proud to stand with amazing people who do so much to assist others. The devastation here is unlike anything I've seen, even in Afghanistan. The work being done is incredible, and we must aid these individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here to plant the US flag as a sign of friendship and support for all the things that people are enduring here. And that's it's a small token of, small tasks that we can do to show our support. I mean, just we have to end this. I mean, you look around at Deepak and you see what's happening. You see the destroyed buildings. You see, these are people's homes. We need to support Russia. We have to have friendship. We have to make sure that all the goals laid out are fulfilled, and we just have to stop this. And we have to do everything we can to help. And, you know, there is old Laurie, the US flag, and I hope that people back home see it. I hope people understand, and look at independent facts. Right? Do your own research. Do your own homework. Find out what's really going on here. We have to support these people. We have to help them. We have to stop this. I feel proud. I feel proud to be here. I've met amazing people. I'm standing with amazing people that have done a lot for this and, to help people. And that's what it's that's what it's about. You know? That's why I'm here. That's what I want to do. And these guys that I'm, you know, here with I mean, these guys are incredible people. My hat's off to them. They're what they do on a daily basis is just unbelievable. It's incredible. And to people back home that are in the military and that have been to war, you know, I'm I'm a I'm a veteran from Afghanistan. The people that have been through this, they understand it. And we haven't seen anything like this even in Afghanistan. This is something I mean, the entire city is rubble. This is unbelievable. And then in Afghanistan, I was in the air force for 10 years in Afghanistan. I've never seen anything like this. This is unbelievable. The work that's being done here, it's just incredible. We have to help these guys.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

17/17 If they really wanted to end the war…

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Great documentary on some of the history of Russia/Ukraine/the United States… https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html

Ukraine On Fire Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to control its rich lands and access to the Black S rumble.com
ivan_8848
Posted - April 11, 2024 at 12:58 AM
Saved - June 1, 2024 at 2:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: Zelensky's behavior and actions have raised concerns. He banned elections, imprisoned journalists, and oppressed the free media. He also banned a language and a church, and enforced conscription. His actions have led to the destruction of his own country. Post 2: Zelensky will be remembered as a corrupt leader who destroyed his country for personal gain. Despite being elected to make peace, he committed crimes and betrayed his people. Post 3: Putin believes that the Ukraine-Russia conflict was planned and orchestrated by the US/NATO. He claims that they crossed a red line despite being warned multiple times, leading to the current situation.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

MUST WATCH ‼️ The Priceless Value of Old Archives! The King Is Naked! ZELENSKY UNMASKED The way Zelensky behaved when he heard words about the Minsk agreements and calls for peace. Body language of actor. Paris in 2019. Who is lauphing now? This man will go down in history as the person who destroyed his own country for fame and fortune. Banned Elections Pocketed Millions Attacked his own people. Banned Peace negotiations Imprisoned journalists Enforced conscription Banned the opposition Opressed the free Media Banned a language Banned a Church

Video Transcript AI Summary
Зеленский и Путин встретились для обсуждения ситуации на Донбассе. Зеленский призывал прекратить огонь, но Макрон не реагировал. Необходимо продлить договор об особом статусе Донбасса и обсудить исполнение Минских соглашений, но нет конкретных ответов от России. Translation: Zelensky and Putin met to discuss the situation in Donbass. Zelensky called for a ceasefire, but Macron seemed indifferent. It is necessary to extend the special status agreement for Donbass and address the implementation of the Minsk agreements, but there are no specific answers from Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Это первая пресс-конференция лидеров за соблюдение существования формата нормата первая и последняя на этот момент встреча путина и зеленского зеленский потом сам признавал во время закрытой части переговоров российский президент раз за разом призывал его прекратить огонь на Донбассе ну и вот какой публичный ответ запечатлела наша программа Зеленский делал все это со своим лицом долго, но Макрон как будто ничего не замечал. Speaker 1: Необходимо, конечно, продлить срок действия договора об особом статусе отдельных регионов Донбасса И в конечном итоге придать этой норме постоянный характер, как это и предусмотрено в Минских соглашениях. Но когда мы задаем вопрос нашим партнерам, в том числе по нормативскому формату: а что конкретно не исполняет Россия по Минским соглашениям? И что, по вашему мнению, по Минским соглашениям Россия должна была бы сделать? Ответа нет.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/EawWBlreOQ

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

This man will go down in history as the person who destroyed his own country for fame and fortune. This man will go down in history as first-class crook, of which there have been many in history. In 2019, Zelensky was elected on an overwhelming mandate to make peace with Russia. Zelensky committed too many crimes and betrayed his people. He deserved Hitler's fate. Agent Zelensky - Part 1 https://youtu.be/HLeBb6hPUC8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky owns properties in Miami, Israel, Italy, London, Georgia, and Crimea, worth millions. His luxurious residences include a villa in Tuscany, an apartment in London, and a penthouse in Crimea. Despite his wealth, Zelensky is hesitant to share his properties with others. His real estate portfolio raises questions about his financial transparency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's go. Firstly, a villain in Miami for himself worth $34,000,000. I've been to Florida and can understand the taste of the president of Ukraine. Secondly, a house in Israel for his parents on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. It's worth $8,000,000. Europe, Zalewski prefers Italy. Tuscany, the best wines. By the way, one of the most expensive resorts in the country, Forte d'Alle Marbi. Houses here are worth their waiting goal. In 2017, together with his wife, he bought a villa 600 meters from the sea. According to the declaration, it was worth about $3,800,000 at that time. Is that all? Not at all. From the south, we moved north, not to Siberia, of course, but to London, old center, legendary Baker Street, opposite the Sherlock Holmes Museum. There's another Zelensky residence, An apartment worth $3,000,000. Why? Probably the state will visit his owners with a report. More on that later. Apparently, the real estate was purchased through the company of his business partner, Sergei Schiffer. That's why he's called Zelensky's personal wallet in Ukraine. I almost forgot about real estate. Georgia, not the state, the country. A new multi story apart hotel in the city of Batumi. You might ask, Batumi? What is that? Well, take a look. It's also a seaside resort. Apartments are under renovation with an expensive finish, panoramic windows, and views in the city and the mountains. Hence, it is built for well-to-do people. At least 5 apartments here belong to Zelensky. Finally, the settlement of Levadia, an elite residential complex emperor. Speaker 1: Look. A magnificent view of Zelensky's house opens up. Here it is, a seashore over there. Speaker 0: Lions, wide staircases, and columns. On the roof, there's a luxurious terrace, a pool, and a wonderful sea view. But guys, it's Crimea. Crimea, which is currently under Russian control. Zelensky made a mistake here, and the Russians will surely figure out how to use it to their advantage. Zelensky's penthouse was purchased here in 2013, right before the so called Crimean spring. Nowadays such a property could be worth about $1,000,000. However, a different amount is stated in his declaration. 1,384,000 Hibernias or about $164,000. Well, we don't even need to mention the real estate in chief or the official residence of the head of the republic in Concha Zaspa. Even without those, it's quite a collection of villas, houses, and apartments. However, the Ukrainian president is in no rush to give them to children, at least not to other people's children. Unfortunately, we have to admit the obvious. Volodymyr Zelensky has always been stingy and greedy.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/KJyfmHC1Pi

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine The Ukraine - Russian War Was Planned Understanding The Roots Of The Russia-Ukraine Conflict Explained By Putin https://t.co/YHodnBWoj8 Putin: We immediately said, "Guys, you can't do this, stop. No, nobody even wanted to listen. They could not fail to realise that this was a red line. We said it a thousand times. No, they did it. So here we have today's situation. And I suspect it was no accident. They needed this conflict.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the events leading up to the Ukrainian crisis and the impact it has had on the country and the world. It highlights the political tensions, the involvement of Western countries, and the consequences of the conflict. The speaker emphasizes the need for respect for sovereignty and international law. The video suggests that the conflict could have been resolved earlier if there had been more dialogue and understanding. The crisis has strained relations between Russia, Europe, and the United States, and has had a significant impact on global politics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Трудно даже поверить. С чего все началось? Хотите жить как в Париже? Хотим. Давайте подписывать. А кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконсульцион. Зачем вы раскалываете страну? Только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, но он не применил. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела Господа. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Там попробуйте, объясните фермерам во Франции, в той же Германии, в Испании, в Греции, в Португалии, в странах юга Европы, что нужно им немножко прижаться в интересах Украины. Я посмотрю на их реакцию, но только не каких-то функционеров, а вот работяг, которые на земле работают. Speaker 1: Слова, сказанные ровно 10 лет назад, кадры сделанные в очередной раз в Speaker 0: последние Speaker 1: украинский кризис перешедший в острую фазу ровно 10 лет назад теперь определяет жизни всего континента да и во многом всего мира Speaker 0: трудно даже поверить с чего все началось С технического решения Президента Януковича перенести подписание договора об ассоциации Украины с Евросоюзом. При этом речь шла даже не об отказе от этого документа, а только о переносе сроков с целью его доработки. Это было сделано, напомню, в полном соответствии с конституционными полномочиями абсолютно легитимного международно признанного главы государства Speaker 1: 8 2013 на украине серьезные экономические сложности и за помощью президент страны янукович обращается главному стратегическому партнеру россии систско-украинские переговоры принесли сегодня сенсационные новости, а события развивались следующим образом: буквально до самого последнего момента вообще не было известно, какие именно документы сегодня будут подписаны и вот за пять минут до начала церемонии нам раздали списки подписанных документов и мы увидели что 14 самым последним пунктом стоит документ под названием Дополнение к контрактам на куплю-продажу газа от января 2009 года. Speaker 0: Который дает возможность Газпрому, что он и намерен делать, продавать на Украину газ по цене 268 с половиной долларов за тысячу кубов. Сейчас эта цена около 400 долларов. Была, можно сказать. С целью поддержки бюджета Украины правительство Российской Федерации приняло решение разместить в ценных бумагах украинского правительства часть своих резервов из фонда национального благосостояния объемом 15 миллиардов долларов США. Хочу обратить Ваше внимание и хочу всех успокоить сегодня мы вообще не обсуждали вопрос о присоединении Украины к таможенному союзу. Speaker 1: Эти слова Путин говорит потому, что украинское общество тогда уже изрядно разогрета обещаниями ассоциации с евросоюзом а взаимодействие с таможенным союзом то есть с россией подается там как некий путь назад в киеве начинаются первые митинги Speaker 0: Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Киев, давай! Speaker 1: Украина це Европа! Украина це Speaker 0: Европа! Говорят, что у украинского народа отбирают мечту, Но если посмотреть на содержание этих соглашений, то до этой мечты многие могут просто не дожить, не дотянуть. Потому что условия очень жесткие. Очень легко спекулировать на этих вопросах. Хотите жить, как в Париже? Хотим. Давайте подписывать. Кто бы сказал? Давайте почитаем. Вы читали, что там написано? Нет. Вы читали эту бумагу? Нет. Никто же нифига не читает. Вы хоть читать-то умеете? Посмотрите, что там написано. Рынки открыть, денег нет, нормы и торговые, и технические регламенты вести европейские. Ну значит что, промышленность надо закрыть, Это выбор кого-то? Ну хорошо. Вот если всё это посчитать, взвесить, то тогда и молодые люди вполне могут разобраться в этом и сказать: Да, мы хотим европейских стандартов, но давайте это сделаем таким образом, чтобы предприятия завтра не закрылись машиностроительные, чтобы судостроение осталось на плаву, чтобы авиация не померла, чтобы космическая отрасль не сдохла. Все эти рынки и кооперация в Speaker 1: России. Эти кадры разобраны посекундно, что фиксируют действительно судьбоносные моменты. Лидеры стран Евросоюза, до этого годами рассказывавшие о демократии и праве выбора, устраивают публичную порку президенту независимой страны януковичу за принятые им решения Speaker 0: украина приостанавливает, не прекращает, а приостанавливает процесс подписания договора с Евросоюзом и хочет все, что называется, посчитать как следует. По сути, мы услышали угрозы со стороны наших европейских партнеров в отношении Украины, вплоть до способствования проведению акций протеста. Вот это и есть давление, вот это и есть шантаж. Speaker 1: Многие жители украины россии недоумевают по поводу все новых и новых кадров из Киева митинги становятся все агрессивнее в центре столицы неприкрыто начинают действовать боевики. Speaker 0: Все что сейчас происходит говорит о том что это не революция, а хорошо подготовленная акция. Эти акции, на мой взгляд, были подготовлены не к сегодняшнему дню, они готовились к президентской выборной кампании весны 2015 года. Просто это небольшой фальш-старт, но это все заготовки к президентским выборам. Хорошо подготовленные и обученные группы боевиков, на самом деле. Вы за или против подписания Украиной соглашения об ассоциации с Европейским Союзом? Мы не за и не против, это вообще не наше дело, это суверенное право украинского народа, украинского руководства, лице президента, парламента и правительства. Правительства. Если бы нам сказали, что Украина в НАТО вступает, тогда мы были бы против реально, потому что продвижение к нашим границам инфраструктуры военного блока для нас представляет опасность Speaker 1: экономические вопросы раз за разом подчеркивает путин суверенное дело украинского руководства но невозможно не учитывать серьезнейшие связи предприятия России и Украины. Speaker 0: Я бы попросил наших друзей в Брюсселе воздержаться от резких выражений, Что, нам для того, чтобы им понравиться, нужно удавить целые отраслью нашей экономики? И я бы полагал, что нужно деполитизировать эту тему, согласиться с предложением Президента Януковича и в трехстороннем формате как следует и обстоятельно на эти все темы поговорить. Speaker 1: В здании европейской комиссии на множестве телевизоров с пометкой горячая новость постоянно идут трансляции с украины январь 14 года руководство Еврокомиссии призывают януковича к сдержанности настаивает на неприменении силы против боевиков на улицах но не видит ничего странного в том что в акциях на майдане против легитимной власти участвуют высокопоставленные западные политики и Speaker 2: меньше на украина ди всем утичкима Люди на Украине, которые так мужественно вышли на улицы и провели демонстрации, вызывают у нас огромное уважение. Впечатляет сколько людей демонстрируют, что они хотят быть ближе к Европейскому Союзу в рамках закона на основе демократических процессов. Speaker 3: Все, что происходит это воплощение надежд Сирии и Украины, их жажды свободы, честных выборов и усталости от взяточничества. Я могу себе представить, как Speaker 0: бы наши европейские партнеры отреагировали, если бы в разгар кризиса, скажем, в Греции либо на Кипре на одном из митингов антиевропейских появился бы наш министр иностранных дел и начал бы обращаться с какими-то призывами. Наши друзья, европейские тоже, обратились с призывом к Президенту, к Правительству не допускать применения силы и так далее. Применение силы это всегда крайняя мера, я с ними согласен абсолютно. Но, знаете, мы сегодня в ходе беседы, я тоже об этом сказал, на Западной Украине священнослужитель призывает толпу ехать в Киев и громить правительство и дальше аргументация чтобы в нашем доме не командовали негры москали то есть русские и жиды вы знаете, это крайне удивительно, что это делает представитель религиозной деятельности а во-вторых это ведь крайнее проявление национализма абсолютно неприемлемое в цивилизованном мире и призывая украинское правительство и президент Януковича действовать цивилизованными методами мы должны обратить внимание и на его политических противников призвать и их тоже придерживаться методов цивилизованной политической борьбы Speaker 1: сейчас почему-то не принято вспоминать но вообще-то массовые беспорядки еще в январе 14 года начались не на донбассе а на западе украины винница штурм здания областной администрации и здесь и в же томире параллельно погромы в Ровно Захват административного здания в Черновцах. Драки и штурм в Черкассах. И вот уже половине страны захвачена власть донбасс тогда молчит наблюдает ждет когда по закону будет наведен порядок в россии тоже надеются на нормализации обстановки в братской стране сочи стартуют олимпийские игры которым россии готовилась долгие 7 лет. Украинские, белорусские и российские спортсмены в олимпийской деревне живут все вместе. Белорусскую сборную на Олимпиаде поддержит президент Александр лукашенко украинский лидер также приедет сочи путин проводит отдельную встречу с украинской олимпийской сборной желает спортсменам успехов Speaker 0: очень хорошая атмосфера создается болельщиками вот конечно болеет за своих но в целом очень желательно и поддерживать всех спортсменов в том числе и других команд страшно все подобрано неожиданно Speaker 1: из Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые Speaker 0: жертвы Speaker 1: С Киева начинают приходить совсем уж страшные кадры стрельба убийства массовые жертвы с момента переворота в Киеве это первый большой публичный комментарий российского президента о произошедшем и происходящем. Speaker 0: Это антиконституционный переворот и вооруженный захват власти. А что было проще сказать в тот момент времени? Вы там переворот совершили? Нет, мы же гаранты, министр иностранных дел Польши, Франции, Германии, как гаранты подписали документ соглашение между президентом Януковичем и оппозицией. Через три дня все это растоптали. А где гаранты? Спросите у них, где они эти гаранты. Почему они не сказали: Ну-ка, пожалуйста, назад все вернитесь. Януковича верните назад! И проводите конституционные демократические выборы. Speaker 4: Я подписал это соглашение, вместе с ними поставил свою подпись, Но я не услышал от них даже слов осуждения в сторону бандитов, которые стреляли в мой кортеж, в мою охрану, и не один раз. Speaker 0: Нам все время говорили, только пусть Янукович не применяет силу, только пусть не применяет силу, но он не применил. Speaker 3: Важно также убедиться в том, что украинские военные не будут вовлечены в кризис, который должен быть разрешен гражданским обществом. Speaker 0: 21 числа вечером мне президент Обама позвонил, мы с ним обсудили эти вопросы, сказали о том, как мы будем способствовать исполнению этих договорённостей, Россия взяла на себя определённые обязательства. Я услышал, что мой американский коллега готов взять на себя определенные обязательства. Это все было 21 вечером. В тот же день мне позвонил Президент Янукович, сказал, что он подписал, считает, что ситуация стабилизировалась, и он собирается поехать в Харьков на конференцию. Не скрою, это не секрет, я выразил определенную озабоченность, сказал, возможно ли в такой ситуации покидать столицу. Он ответил, что считает возможным, поскольку есть документ, подписанный с оппозиции, и министр иностранных дел европейских стран выступили гарантами исполнения этой договоренности. Скажу вам еще больше. Я ему ответил, что я сомневаюсь в том, что все так будет хорошо, но это его дело, он же в конце концов президент, он чувствует ситуацию, ему виднее, как поступать. Во всяком случае, мне кажется, нельзя выводить силу правопорядка из Киева, сказал ему я. Он сказал: Да, конечно, это я понимаю. Уехал и дал команду вывести все силы правопорядка из Киева. Красавец Леша. Я Speaker 4: верил в порядочность иностранных посредников. Меня не просто обманули, меня цинично обманули, но не меня обманули, обманули весь украинский народ. Speaker 0: Янукович свою власть практически сдал. Он согласился на все, что требовала оппозиция. Он согласился на досрочные выборы парламента, на досрочные выборы Президента, согласился вернуться к Конституции 2004 года. Вы там Януковича успокоите, а мы успокоим оппозицию. Янукович не применил, как просили нас американцы, ни вооруженных сил, ни полиции. А вооруженная оппозиция в Киеве провела госпереворот. Как это понимать? Вы кто такие вообще? Неохота здесь камеры работают, жесты определенные показывать. Вы понимаете, какие жесты мне сейчас хочется показать. Вот что они нам показали. Поняли, что окончательно свинтить Украину под себя исключительно политическими средствами не удается, совершили госпереворот, лишили нас шансов нормальным политическим образом выстраивать отношения с этой страной. Они действовали и пошли, как у нас в народе говорят, простите за моветон, по беспределу просто. Уже началась гражданская война и хаос. Кому это, зачем это надо было делать, если Янукович и так со всем согласился? Надо было пойти на выборы, и те же люди пришли бы сейчас к власти только легальным путем. Мы, как идиоты, платили бы 15 миллиардов, которые обещали, держали бы низкие цены на газ, дальше продолжали субсидировать экономику. И давайте прямо, здесь же все взрослые люди, правильно, умные, грамотные люди. Запад поддержал государственный переворот антиконстуционный. Что дальше? Вот смотрите, госпереворот совершили, с нами разговаривать не хотят, у нас какие мысли? Следующий шаг Украина в НАТО. Мы считаем, что с нами пытались разговаривать с помощью силы, и что мы, именно действуя в такой логике, дали адекватные ответы. Мы не создавали этого кризиса, мы были противниками такого развития событий. Не мы же там пирожки раздавали повстанцам на этот счет. Да, мы понимаем, там сложные процессы, но не таким же образом их нужно решать, причём где? Прямо у наших границ. Но вы где находитесь? За тысячи километров? А мы здесь? Это наша Земля. Вы за что хотите там бороться? Не знаете? А мы знаем, и мы на это готовы. Я бы никогда не стал этого делать, если бы не считал, что мы обязаны поступить именно таким образом. Что касается хронологии событий, то сначала произошел государственный переворот и захват власти, и вот с этого момента наши взгляды и пути с руководством Украины стали диаметрально противоположными. С этого момента мы с ними разошлись. Но после этого Крым вернулся в состав Российской Федерации, а не наоборот. Так что у нас отношения испортились с Украиной, с Крымом в принципе не связано. Мы разве какие-то операции в Крыму или где-то еще проводили с нормальной страной и с нормальной властью? Нет, никогда этого не делали, в голове даже этого не держали. Но зачем же западные страны поддержали государственный переворот? С этого момента для нас власть на Украине источник власти, госпереворот, а не воля народа. Speaker 1: Откуда вам это известно? Очень просто, Speaker 0: потому что люди, которые живут на Украине, у нас с ними тысяча совместных всяких контактов и тысяча связей И мы знаем, кто, где, когда встречался, работал с теми людьми, которые свергали Януковича, как их поддерживали, сколько платили, как готовили, на каких территориях, в каких странах и кто были эти инструкторы. Мы все знаем. Speaker 1: Вы уважаете суверенитет Украины? Speaker 0: Конечно. Но мы хотели бы, чтобы и другие страны уважали суверенитет других стран, в том числе и Украины. А уважать суверенитет это значит не допускать государственных переворотов. Это кто делал? Американские наши дружки. А европейцы, которые подписались как гаранты договоренности между властью и оппозицией, сделали вид, что вообще ничего не знают. С этого всё началось. Сейчас говорят: ну давайте об этом не будем вспоминать. Нет, будем помнить об этом всегда, потому что в этом причина, и причина в тех людях, которые способствовали этому перевороту. Но Speaker 1: даже после сотен жертв, документальных кадров кровавых побоищ, та же Меркель, и спустя годы, публично говорила: Speaker 2: Мы считаем, что украинское правительство пришло к власти демократическим путем. Speaker 0: Если мы будем вот так вот с разными стандартами подходить к одинаковым явлениям, что мы никогда ни о чем не сможем договориться. Мы должны утвердить, в конце концов, не право сильного и право кулака в международных делах, а нормы международного права. Speaker 1: -Конфликт на Украине и вокруг нее, который разгорелся ровно 10 лет назад, который сейчас поставил мир на грань третьей мировой войны, мог быть урегулирован еще тогда, в феврале 14-го. Speaker 0: Вы же сразу сказали: ребята, так нельзя, остановитесь. Нет, никто ее слушать не хотел. Они же не могли не понимать, что это красная черта, мы тысячу раз об этом сказали, нет, полезли. Вот мы получили сегодняшнюю ситуацию. Я подозреваю, что не случайно им нужен был этот конфликт. Speaker 1: В результате сша разорвали связи россии и европы разожгли вооруженный конфликт между братскими народами но и по своему положению в мире нанесли такой удар от которого некогда глобальный лидер уже вряд ли когда-либо оправиться
nxt888
Posted - May 29, 2024 at 9:28 AM
Saved - May 30, 2024 at 1:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2007, President Putin expressed frustration at the broken promises made by Western leaders regarding NATO enlargement. Despite assurances that NATO would not move eastward, it did. European leaders warned the US against involving Ukraine, but their advice was ignored. The situation was compared to Mexico allowing a Chinese military base on the US border. The decision to enlarge NATO to Ukraine shocked and angered European leaders.

@nxt888 - Sony Thang

🇺🇸JEFFREY SACHS: "In 2007, President Putin gave a very clear speech at the Munich Security Conference—very powerful, very correct, very frustrated—where he said: 'Gentlemen, you told us in 1990 that NATO would never enlarge. That was the promise made to President Gorbachev and it was the promise made to President Yeltsin. You cheated, and you repeatedly cheated, and you don't even admit that you said this. But it's all plainly documented, by the way, in a thousand archival sites, so it's easy to verify all of this.' James Baker III, our Secretary of State, said that NATO would not move one inch eastward. It wasn't a flippant statement; it was a statement repeated and repeated and repeated. Hans-Dietrich Genscher, the Foreign Minister of Germany, said the same story. The Germans wanted reunification, and Gorbachev said, 'We'll support that, but we don't want that to come at our expense.' 'No, no, it won't come at your expense. NATO won't move one inch eastward, Mr. President,' was repeated so many times in many documents, many statements by the NATO Secretary General, by the US Secretary of State, by the German Chancellor. Now, of course, all denied by our foreign policy establishment because we're not supposed to remember anything. Remember, this was all 'unprovoked'. So, back to 2007—Putin gives this speech and says: 'Stop. Don't even think about Ukraine. This is our 2,100-kilometer border. This is absolutely part of the integrated economy of this region. Don't even think about it.' Now, I know from insiders, from all the diplomatic work that I do, that European leaders were saying to the US, 'Don't think about Ukraine. Please, you know this is not a good idea. Just stop.' We know from our current CIA Director, Bill Burns, that he wrote a very eloquent, impassioned, articulate, clear, secret (as usual) memo, which we only got to see because Wikileaks showed the American people what maybe we would like to know once in a while but are never told—what our government's doing, how they're putting us at nuclear risk, and other things. This one did get out, and it's called 'Nyet Means Nyet' ('No Means No'). What Bill Burns very perceptively, articulately conveys to Condoleezza Rice and back to the White House in 2008 is: 'Ukraine is really a red line. Don't do it. It's not just Putin; it's not just Putin's government. It's the entire political class of Russia.' And just to help all of us as we think about it, it is exactly as if Mexico said, 'We think it would be great to have a Chinese military base on the Rio Grande. We can't see why the US would have any problem with that.' Of course, we would go completely insane (and we should, of course). The whole idea is so absurdly dangerous and reckless that you can't even imagine grown-ups doing this. What happens is, from what I'm told by European leaders and through long, detailed discussions, Bush Jr. says to them, 'No, no, no, no, it's okay. Don't worry. I hear you about Ukraine.' Then he goes off for the Christmas holidays and comes back—whether it's Cheney, whether it's Bush, whatever it is—and says, 'Yeah, NATO's going to enlarge to Ukraine.' The Europeans are shocked, pissed—'What are you doing?'"

greenmoggy
Posted - June 5, 2024 at 10:03 AM
Saved - October 22, 2024 at 10:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Since the fall of the USSR, I've observed Russia's attempts to address NATO's expansion peacefully, while the US seems intent on placing weapons on Russia's border and fragmenting the country. After presenting a draft treaty to Biden in December 2021, negotiations failed, leaving war as the only option. Despite a US-backed coup in Ukraine in 2014 and ongoing tensions, Russia has largely pursued diplomacy. However, with increasing US military presence, Russia feels compelled to protect itself against what it perceives as imperialist threats, fearing a potential global conflict.

@greenmoggy - ☭ David Walker ☭

1/4 Ever since the fall of USSR, Russia has ben trying to address the expansion of NATO peacefully, but US wants to put its weapons & nukes on Russia's border, & to fragment Russia into small controllable states. When Putin met Biden Dec/2021, Putin https://t.co/ffuucpFZaU

Video Transcript AI Summary
In December 2021, Putin presented a draft Russia-US security agreement, proposing a halt to NATO enlargement. The speaker contacted Jake Sullivan at the White House, urging negotiation to avoid war, arguing NATO enlargement is counter to US security. The US formally responded in January 2022 that NATO issues are nonnegotiable and solely concern NATO countries and candidates, excluding any third-party influence, including Russia. The speaker likened this stance to a hypothetical scenario of China establishing military bases on the Rio Grande, asserting the US would have no right to interfere. The speaker claims this response was not "unprovoked" and followed 30 years of provocation where the US would only accept doing whatever it wants, wherever it wants, with no one having any say.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2021, Putin met with Biden. And then after the meeting, he put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. Put it on the table on December 15, 2021. It's worth reading. Very plausible document. I don't agree with some of it. It's it's a negotiable document. Something you would negotiate. I thought the core of it was stop the NATO enlargement. And, I called the White House myself at that point and, said, don't have a war over this. Who'd you talk to? I talked to Jake Sullivan, and he said, don't don't have a war over this. We don't need NATO enlargement for US security. In fact, it's counter to US security. The US should not be right up against the Russian border. That's how we trip ourselves into World War 3. No, Jeff. Don't worry. No war. There's not gonna be a war. Don't worry. We we've got a diplomatic approach to say, Jake, this is a basis for diplomacy. Negotiate. Well, the formal response of the United States is that issues about NATO are nonnegotiable. They're only between NATO countries and NATO candidates. No third party has any stake or interest or say in this. Russia, it's completely irrelevant. Again, to use the analogy, you know, if Mexico and China wanna put Chinese, military bases on the Rio Grande, the United States has no right to interfere. And no interest in it. And no interest in it. And no by letter. And this was the formal US response in January 2022. So unprovoked, not exactly. So could I 30 years of provocation where we could not take peace for an answer one moment. All we could take is we'll do whatever we want, wherever we want, and no one has any say in this at all.

@greenmoggy - ☭ David Walker ☭

2/4 prepared a draft treaty for NATO to roll back, but the imperial bully wouldn't negotiate & Russia was left with the only option of war, after over 3 decades when US promised no expansion of NATO. It doubled in size with all US forces in Europe staring at just the 1 "enemy",

@greenmoggy - ☭ David Walker ☭

3/4 Russia. US forces get ever closer. Despite a US coup in Ukraine 2014 that saw US-backed nazis bomb & brutalise ethnic Russians, who demanded Russia majorly intervene, apart from small assistance & Crimea, Russia still mostly tried the peaceful diplomatic approach. US never

@greenmoggy - ☭ David Walker ☭

4/4 sought peace after 9/11 or nukes in Cuba. Russia has been very patient but, at the end of the day, like every other state should, it must protect itself & stop US plans to destroy Russia, & to put US bases in Russia, north of China. Imperialism must stop or it'll be WW3.

ivan_8848
Posted - June 17, 2024 at 9:45 AM
Saved - June 17, 2024 at 10:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jeffrey Sachs reveals how the US played a significant role in the Ukraine conflict. Bush's promise to bring Ukraine into NATO sparked a standoff with Russia. Despite Putin's warnings, US neocons dismissed his concerns. In 2014, the US supported an uprising that led to the current conflict. The Minsk agreements for Donbass autonomy were not honored, and the US and Germany used the time to strengthen Ukraine. Ignoring Russia's security agreement proposal, the US increased military support, escalating tensions.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

🗣 Jeffrey Sachs Exposes US Role in Igniting Ukraine Conflict: Ignored Warnings, Secret Coup, and Broken Peace Deals 👉 Bush's promise to bring Ukraine into NATO ignites a major standoff with Russia. 👉 Putin warns against NATO expansion, but US neocons dismiss his concerns, believing in US dominance. 👉 In 2014, the US supports an uprising that overthrows Ukraine's neutral-leaning president, starting the current conflict. 👉 Minsk agreements for Donbass autonomy are signed but not honored, with the US and Germany admitting they used the time to bolster Ukraine. 👉 The US ramps up military support for Ukraine, ignoring Russia’s 2021 proposal for a security agreement and fueling further tensions.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US pushed for Ukraine to join NATO, leading to tensions with Russia. After a violent coup in 2014, Russia annexed Crimea to protect its naval base. Despite peace agreements, the US continued to support Ukraine militarily, rejecting Russia's proposal for a security agreement in 2021. The US insisted that NATO issues are nonnegotiable, leading to further tensions with Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bush pushed, pushed, pushed. This is a US alliance fundamentally, and they made the commitment Ukraine will become a member of NATO. The dodge was, okay, we won't give them exactly the road map right now but Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Because in those days, the US and Russia met in a NATO partnership even then, Putin was there the next day in Bucharest saying, don't do this. This is completely reckless. Essentially, this is our fundamental red line. Do not do this. The US can't hear any of this. This is our biggest problem of all because the neocons who have run the show for 30 years believe the US can do whatever it wants. This is the most fundamental point to understand about US foreign policy. They're wrong. They keep screwing up. They keep getting us into $1,000,000,000,000 plus wars. They keep killing a lot of people, but their basic belief is the US is the only superpower. It's the unipolar power, and we can do what we want. So they could not hear Putin. Even that moment, they couldn't hear the rest of the Europeans, and, by the way, they said Georgia would become part of NATO. Again, the only way to understand that is in this long standing Palmerston, Brzezinski theory. This isn't just haphazard. Oh, why don't we take Georgia? This is a plan. Okay. The Russians understand every single step of this. So another thing goes awry. What goes awry? The Ukrainians don't want NATO enlargement. The Ukrainians don't want it. They're against it. The public opinion said, no. This is very dangerous. Neutrality, it's safer. We're in between east and west. We don't want this. So they elect Viktor Yanukovych Yes. A president that says, we'll just be neutral. And that's absolutely the US's, oh, what the hell is this? Ukraine? They don't have any choice either. So Yanukovych becomes the enemy of the neocons, obviously. So they start working, of course, the way that the US does. We got to get rid of this guy. Maybe we'll elect his opponent afterwards, maybe we'll catch him in a crisis and so forth. And indeed, at the end of 2013, the US absolutely stokes a crisis that becomes an insurrection and then becomes a coup. And I know, again, from firsthand experience, the US was profoundly implicated in that, but you can see our senators standing up in the crowd, like, if Chinese officials came to January 6th and said, yes, yes, go. You know, can how would we like it if, if if Chinese leaders, came and said, yo. We we were with you a 100%. American senators standing up in Kiev saying to the demonstrators, we're with you a 100%. Victoria Nuland famously passing around the cookies, but it was much, much more than the cookies, I can tell you. And so the US conspired with a Ukrainian right to overthrow Yanukovych and there was a violent overthrow in the 3rd week of February of 2014. That's when this war started. This war didn't even start in 2022. It started in 20 14. That was the outbreak of the war. It was a violent coup that overthrew a Ukrainian president that wanted neutrality. When he was violently overthrown and his security people told him, you're gonna get killed, and so he flew to Kharkiv and then, flew onward to Russia that day. The US immediately, in a nanosecond, recognized the new government. This is a coup. This is how the CIA does its regime change operations. So this is when the war starts. Putin's understanding, completely correct in this moment, was I'm not letting NATO take my naval fleet and my naval base in Crimea. Are you kidding? The Russian naval base in the Black Sea, which was the object of the Crimean War, and in its way is the object of this war in Sevastopol, has been there since 17/83, and now Putin's saying, oh, NATO's gonna walk in? Hell, no. And so they organize this referendum of the this is a Russian region, and there's an overwhelming support. We'll stay with Russia. Thank you. Not with this new post coup government. An outbreak breaks out in the eastern provinces, which are the ethnic Russian provinces, in the Donbas in the Donbas, in Lugansk, and Donetsk. And there's a lot of violence, so the war starts in 2014. So saying something's unprovoked in 2022 is a little bizarre for anyone that actually reads a normal newspaper to begin with. But in any event, the war starts then, and within a year, the Russians are saying very wisely, we actually don't want this war. We don't wanna own Ukraine. We don't want problems on our border. We would like peace based on respect for the ethnic Russians in the east and political autonomy because you, the coup government, tried to close down all Russian language, culture, and rights of these people after having made a violent coup. So we don't accept that. So what came out of that was two agreements called the Minsk 1 and the Minsk 2 agreement. The Minsk 2 agreement was backed by the UN Security Council and it said that we'll make peace based on autonomy of the Donbas region. Now very interesting, the Russians were not saying that's ours. We want that. All the things that are claimed every day that Putin just wants to recreate. You know, he thinks he's Peter the Great. He wants to recreate the Russian empire. He wants to grab territory. Nothing like that. The opposite. We don't want the territory. We actually just want autonomy based on an agreement reached with the Ukrainian government. So what was the US attitude towards that? US government attitude. US government attitude was to say to the Ukrainians, don't worry about it. Come on. Don't worry about it. You keep your central state. We don't wanna see Ukraine weakened at all. We just wanted NATO, in a unified Ukraine. Don't go for decentralization. We tell them to blow off the very treaty that they've signed. Then we accuse Russia of not having diplomacy, by the way, which is par for the course. Oh, you can't trust them. We blow off every single agreement. We blow off not moving 1 inch eastward. We blow off the Anti Ballistic Missile Treaty. We have so many NATO led wars of choice in between. I didn't even mention in Syria, CIA attempt to overthrow Assad in Libya and so forth, and we blow off the Minsk agreements. And actually, Angela Merkel explained in a rather shockingly frank interview that she gave last year when asked why Germany didn't help to enforce the Minsk agreement because Germany and France were the guarantors of the Minsk agreement under something called the Normandy process, she said, well, we just thought this was to give some time to the Ukrainians to build up their strength. In other words, they were guarantors of something in a phony way, and the US was absolutely lying about this, and I know senior Ukrainians who were in government and who were around the government who said to me, Jeff, we're not gonna do that. Anyway, that was at gunpoint. We don't have to agree with that. So all that diplomacy was blown off. The war continued. The US pumped in arms, built up armaments, was building up what would be the biggest army of Europe, actually, a huge army, that Russia was watching. What are you doing? Know? You're not honoring Minsk. You're building up this huge Ukrainian army. Paid for by NATO. Paid for by the United States, basically. Yes. And in 2021, Putin met with Biden. And then after the meeting, he put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. He put it on the table on December 15, 2021. It's worth reading, very plausible document. I don't agree with some of it. It's it's a negotiable document, something you would negotiate. I thought the core of it was stop the NATO enlargement. And I called the White House myself at that point and, said, don't have a war over this. Who'd you talk to? I talked to Jake Sullivan, and they said, don't don't have a war over this. We don't need NATO enlargement for US security. In fact, it's counter to US security. The US should not be right up against the Russian border. That's how we trip ourselves into World War 3. No, Jeff. Don't worry. No war. There's not gonna be a war. Don't worry. We we've got a diplomatic approach. I said, Jake, this is a basis for diplomacy. Negotiate. Well, the formal response of the United States is that issues about NATO are nonnegotiable. They're only between NATO countries and NATO candidates. No third party has any stake or interest or say in this. Russia, it's completely irrelevant. Again, to use the analogy, if Mexico and China want to put Chinese military bases on the Rio Grande, the United States has no right to interfere and no interest in it. And no interest in it and no bylaw. And this was the formal US response in January 2022.
WarClandestine
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 6:44 PM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 7:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Ukraine operates as a CIA base, having been influenced since the Soviet Union's fall. The CIA's involvement began with the Nunn-Lugar Act in 1991, leading to the establishment of US-funded operations under the guise of foreign aid. The 2014 civil war was fueled by US support for certain groups, allowing the State Department to install pro-US leaders. Putin's response stems from a desire to prevent NATO's encroachment on Russia's borders. The narrative of an unprovoked Russian attack obscures the US's role in escalating the conflict, which I see as a continuation of Cold War dynamics.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

I do. Ukraine is essentially a giant CIA base, posing as a sovereign nation. The CIA moved into Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union, looking to take advantage of the lawless and destabilized country, using it as an offshore proxy, outside the scope of US oversight. It began with the Nunn-Lugar Act in 1991, and then carried on into 2005, when then Senators Obama and Lugar visited Ukraine, to inspect the former Soviet bio, chemical, and nuclear facilities (pictured below), and then added Ukraine to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and began turning these former Soviet facilities into “defensive research facilities”, which opened the door for US contractors to establish their foothold in Ukraine, and set up their money laundering and racketeering operations, under the guise of “foreign aid”. Then the CIA funded Nazi militant groups in Ukraine which led to the outbreak of civil war in 2014 in the Donbas. Amidst the chaos, the US State Department, via Victoria Nuland, leveraged the situation to install US-loyal puppets, including the infamous leaked phone call between her and fellow State Department bureaucrat Geoffrey Pyatt, about ensuring “their guy” Yatsenuik, was installed as Prime Minister. The State Department, in tandem with the CIA, covertly took control of Ukraine via Color Revolution in 2014. Putin recognized this. He knew that the US had destabilized and taken control of Ukraine, and recognized that the US were building a proxy army on his border, by funding, training, and supplying Ukraine with weapons, and trying to bring them into NATO. This was a red line for Putin, as he has said for decades. Russia have been invaded from the West too many times before, and will not tolerate a hostile standing army and long-range missiles on their border. Just like the US didn’t like it when Russia tried to put nukes in Cuba in the 60’s, Russia doesn’t like the US trying to bring armies and weapons to Ukraine. Essentially, Ukraine is an unofficial US territory and NATO member, and the Deep State do not want to lose out on their cash cow and strategic asset that is Ukraine, hence why they continue to send hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to protect Ukraine’s border. They are using Ukraine as a laundry mat to funnel in hundreds of billions for the war machine, and also covering up their extreme criminality in Ukraine, including crimes against humanity for bioweapon development, human trafficking, drug trafficking, etc. All the things they can’t get away with stateside, they do in Ukraine. If the public knew the truth about the origins of US involvement in Ukraine, they would NEVER have supported sending a single penny to Ukraine. The narrative that Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022 “unprovoked”, is war propaganda to make it appear Ukraine are the righteous defenders in order to garner your support, when in reality, The US started this conflict, they are the ones who brought war to Putin’s doorstep, and the US are the ones perpetuating the war by continuing to fund and supply Ukraine. Putin does not want to conquer all of Europe, he just wants NATO off of his border, and justice for US development of weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine, namely, gene-specific biological weapons. The Cold War never truly ended.

@EricRWeinstein - Eric Weinstein

I don’t understand what we are doing in Ukraine. And I don’t think you do either.

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 2:30 AM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 7:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the Ukraine war, highlighting that it was a long-prepared conflict driven by economic interests. The U.S. supported a coup in Ukraine in 2014, leading to violence against Russian-speaking populations. I pointed out that peace agreements were merely a facade to strengthen Ukraine's military for a confrontation with Russia. The narrative in the U.S. simplifies Putin's actions as purely aggressive, ignoring the geopolitical context. I emphasized the uniparty system's role in wars and coups, often motivated by resource interests, as noted by Lindsey Graham regarding Eastern Ukraine's minerals.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

.@jimmy_dore: "They had the Ukraine war in the chamber, which they had been preparing for at least a decade. Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper are never going to tell you that the CIA got in bed with right-wing Nazis in Ukraine to overthrow their democratically elected government. Why? For economic reasons. They got a better deal from Putin and Russia than they were getting from the European Union, and that cannot stand. So, we overthrew their democratically elected president. So what happened after we overthrew the government in Ukraine in 2014 was the Russian-speaking ethnics in the eastern part of Ukraine didn't want to go along with that coup government, and so the Ukrainian government started bombing them. They started shelling them, which is why we had to have peace agreements, Minsk Accords I and II, and Angela Merkel revealed that they never meant to go along with those. They just used that as a time to build up the Ukrainian military to get ready for a war with Russia that they were going to provoke, which everyone knows that they did provoke. They provoked it using Kamala Harris at the Munich Security Conference when she said we're going to put Ukraine in NATO. That was the final straw. All Putin wanted was I can't have you putting nuclear weapons in Ukraine, and I can't have NATO right on my border. But the way it's told in the United States is that Putin is an evil dictator, and he just woke up one day and decided to invade Ukraine. And then, of course, he blew up his own pipeline, the Nord Stream pipeline, which actually screws over Europe and Germany. People say I'm turning Democrats into Republicans and stuff like this. No, I'm trying to wake up Democrats and Republicans to the uniparty that has been running things. Every war, every coup that we do, there seem to be some natural resources that we are actually after, and Lindsey Graham just said it: there's $11 trillion in rare earth minerals under Eastern Ukraine. He blurts it out like his boyfriend's name on Valentine's Day."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan was celebrated by some, but concerns arose about the financial implications and the potential for another conflict, which turned out to be the war in Ukraine. The U.S. supported a coup in Ukraine in 2014, leading to the current situation where the Ukrainian government, under Zelensky, has acted increasingly authoritarian despite his initial peace promises. The Minsk Accords were ignored, allowing for military buildup against Russia. Provocations from the U.S., including NATO expansion, contributed to the conflict. The narrative in the U.S. frames Putin as the sole aggressor, while economic interests, including Ukraine's vast mineral resources, are often overlooked. The media's failure to hold leaders accountable perpetuates this propaganda, with journalists increasingly coming from elite backgrounds, lacking diverse perspectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I remember when when, Biden was pulling out of Afghanistan, and there was a lot of people who consider themselves liberal that were, giving him congratulations. Look. He's getting out. He's getting out. And I was like, well, wait a minute. What is he gonna do with the money that we've been spending in Afghanistan? Has he said, well, I'm gonna wait till I hear because I'm pretty sure they have another war in the chamber if they're gonna let him end this one, and exactly they did. They had the Ukraine war in the chamber, which they had been preparing for for at least a decade, if not longer. And and and, again, that's the Rachel Maddow, Anderson Cooper, even they're never gonna tell you that, oh, that's right. The CIA got in bed with right wing Nazis in Ukraine to overthrow their democratically elected government. Why? For economic reasons. That's why. Why? Because, oh, because the, Ukraine wanted to also they got a better economic deal from Putin and Russia than they were getting from the European Union, and that cannot stand. And so we, we overthrew their democratically elected president, then we Zelensky's a puppet. Right? And he ran on peace. That's the irony. So he ran on peace and ending war, and now and now he's banning newspapers and opposition parties and going into Christian churches, and you you've you've seen it all. And, you know, killing American journalists. Right? Because I was elected. Speaker 1: He's a dictator. And he's a dictator. Definition. Speaker 0: Exactly. So they'll never tell you about the Mink's Accords and that they had peace agreements and that, as Angela Merkel revealed that they never the the Ukraine and the NATO never intended to abide by the peace. So what happened after we overthrew the government in Ukraine, in 2014 was, the people, the Russian speaking ethnics in the east part of Ukraine didn't wanna go along with that coup government, and so the Ukrainian government, Nazis started bombing them. Right? They started shelling them, which is why we had to have peace agreements, Minsk 1 and 2 Accords. And Angela Merkel revealed that they never meant to go along with those. They just used that as a time to build up the Ukrainian military to get ready for a war with Russia that they were gonna provoke, which everyone knows that they did provoke. Speaker 1: They certainly did provoke it. And I don't think everyone knows that, but I'll just say it again. They provoked it using Kamala Harris at the Munich Security Council. Speaker 0: When she said that you were gonna put them in u we're gonna put Ukraine in NATO. That was the final straw. And there was a you know, all all Putin wanted was, hey. Just don't do that. I can't have you putting nuclear weapons, and I can't have a NATO right at my border. And you could everybody could anyway. And so they but the way it's told in the in the United States is that Putin is an evil dictator, and he just woke up one day and decided to invade Ukraine for kicks because he's just evil. And they don't have any and then, of course, he blew up his own pipeline, the Nord Stream pipeline, the biggest and which actually screws over Europe and Germany. Alright? Now their economies are all hurt, actually screws over Europe and Germany. Oh. Now their economies are all hurting because of that, and Putin's economy is outgrowing growing faster than the United States. Exactly. And, I believe I was called a traitor for Speaker 1: pointing that Speaker 0: out, but it doesn't Speaker 1: make it any less true. It's a fact. Speaker 0: But this is all and this this is so frustrating, this kind of propaganda. And because I have the time to look into this and I'm aware of it and I can't keep my mouth shut about it, now, you know, everybody calls me a right winger. People say I'm turning Democrats into Republicans and stuff like that. I'm just like, no. I'm trying to wake up Democrats and Republicans to the Uni Party that's been running things, and that's exactly what we're we're living in. You know? And and, you know, it it's it's funny. I'm I'm noting some kind of a pattern. Every war, there seems to be some kind of in every coup we do, there seems to be some kind of natural resource that we actually are after in an economic gain just like well, Lindsey Graham just said it that there there's $11,000,000,000,000 in rare earth minerals under Ukraine. He just blurts it out like his boyfriend's name on Valentine's Day, and, there it is. And I'm like, oh, nobody ever talked about this for the first 3, 4 years of this war. All of a sudden, he's like, oh, it's all about $11,000,000,000,000 in rare like, you son of a bitch. And they just say it. They just say it out loud, and there's no media there to hold him accountable because the media is now owned by billionaires like Jeff Bezos, and they they don't hire journalists from blue collar backgrounds. They hire journalists from, Ivy League Schools who are gonna be class loyal. They and they don't have to tell them what to say. Exactly. Speaker 1: Who are gonna be class loyal, boy.
dbenner83
Posted - November 12, 2024 at 12:13 AM
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 7:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched Jeffrey Sachs explain how the US and NATO provoked the war in Ukraine, tracing back to promises made in 1990 that NATO wouldn’t expand eastward. He detailed the NATO expansion starting in 1999, US actions in Serbia, and the regime change in Ukraine in 2014. He emphasized that the narrative of Putin as a madman is misleading. Supporting evidence includes documents confirming the US's commitment against NATO expansion, which has been overlooked by the media. Even NATO's own leaders acknowledged Russia's concerns about NATO's eastward movement.

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

🚨 WATCH: Jeffrey Sachs tells the cold, hard truth how the US and NATO provoked war in Ukraine in 4 minutes "It started in 1990, when US Secretary of State James Baker said to Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch eastward... The US then cheated on this, starting in 1994, when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. The expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Then, the US led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was the use of NATO to bomb a European capital for 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much, but even Putin started out pro-European and pro-American. He considered whether to join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. In 2002, the US unilaterally walked out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. What it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire, direct threat to national security, by making possible a decapitation strike of missiles that are a few minutes away from Moscow. In 2004-2005, the US engaged in a soft regime change in Ukraine, the so-called First Color Revolution. In 2009, Yanukovych won the election and became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality in Ukraine. In 2014, the US participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych. Nuland and the US Ambassador to Ukraine...talked about regime change. So they made the new government! The US then said 'now NATO's really going to enlarge.' Putin kept saying 'stop, you promised no NATO enlargement.' Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the 'not one inch eastward.' In 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russian-US security agreement. The basis of it was no NATO enlargement. The special military operations started, and five days later Zelenskyy said 'okay, okay, neutrality.' And then the US and Britain said no way, you guys fight on. We've got your back. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave. Absolutely ghastly. We're not dealing with, as we're told every day, this madman like Hitler. This is complete bogus, fake history that is a purely PR narrative of the US government. We're playing games here. So God forbid a nuclear power comes at us. I don't know what's going to happen, but we came at them."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukraine war's roots trace back to 1990, when the U.S. promised not to expand NATO eastward in exchange for German unification. However, NATO began expanding in 1999, leading to tensions with Russia. Initially, Putin was open to cooperation, but U.S. actions, including withdrawing from the anti-ballistic missile treaty and supporting regime change in Ukraine, heightened distrust. In 2014, the U.S. played a role in the overthrow of Ukraine's elected president, Yanukovych, despite Russian objections to NATO's expansion. In December 2021, Putin proposed a security agreement to halt NATO enlargement, but the U.S. rejected it. The conflict escalated, resulting in significant Ukrainian casualties, while the narrative of a madman in Putin is seen as misleading. The situation reflects a complex geopolitical struggle rather than a simple attack.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just explain in 2 minutes the Ukraine war. This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990. James Baker the 3rd, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move 1 inch eastward if you agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power. The expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. Then, the US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But even Putin started out pro European, pro American, actually asked maybe we should join NATO, when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. 911 came, then came, Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah. We'll support you. We understand to root out terror. In 2002, the United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. What it did was trigger the US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat to national security by making possible a decapitation strike of missiles that are a few minutes away from Moscow. In 2,004, 5, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine, the so called first color revolution. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president. And in 2010, on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. So in February 22, 2014, the United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland and the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piatt, who's a senior state department official till today. And they talked about regime change. So they made the new government. The US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, 7 more countries in the not 1 inch eastward. On December 15, 2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. The special military operation started, and 5 days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then the United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die, but we got your back. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave. Absolutely ghastly. We have to understand we're not dealing with, as we're told every day, with this madman like Hitler. This is complete bogus fake history that is a purely PR narrative of the US government. We're playing games here. So God forbid, a nuclear power comes at us. I don't know what's gonna happen, but we came at them.

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

Neocons and NATO shills insist that Gorbachev denied that the US promised not to move NATO eastward, and he did...at times. At other points, he said the opposite, like in this quote. Thankfully, we still have the minutes from the conference to prove it was indeed promised. https://t.co/hUQEEsil2d

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gorbachev has made various statements that seem contradictory. While he has quoted promises made by Americans regarding NATO not expanding beyond Germany after the Cold War, the reality is that many Central and Eastern European countries are now NATO members. This raises questions about trustworthiness. Gorbachev's comments suggest he acknowledges these broken promises, though he may not directly reference Baker’s quote. Ultimately, there are documented minutes from meetings that clarify what was discussed, providing a clearer understanding of the commitments made at that time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So here's listen. I get your point there, and particularly the Gorby quote I've heard a lot. There's lots of other, quotes from Gorbachev. So here's another one. Okay? Yeah. And this is it just flies in the face of that one. Right? So clearly, he's on both sides, and I'll send you the link if you want. No. There is there are there are other Gorbachev. Go ahead. The Americans promised that NATO would wouldn't move beyond the boundaries of Germany after the Cold War, but now half of Central and Eastern Europe are members. So what happened to their promises? It shows they cannot be trusted. So Gorbachev the Gorbachev may not be referring exactly to that Baker quote. Well, okay. But he's making the point that this was promised. Okay. So Now he's so he's kind of contradicted himself in several different areas. The fact is that you can look at what he said here or look at what he said there. But this is Or you can read the minutes of the meeting, which we have. This So we know exactly what we said. Might be for you.

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

Thanks to a document that resurfaced in 2022, we know that the German diplomat made clear that the Western alliance promised not to move NATO beyond the Elbe and excluded "Poland and the others." This destroys the claim that Baker's comments pertained only to Germany. https://t.co/Hw8rOKHBzq

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

Baker's promise not to move NATO "one inch eastward" is a documented fact in the public record. Source: George H.W. Bush Presidential Library, NSC Scowcroft Files, Box 91128, Folder “Gorbachev (Dobrynin) Sensitive.” https://t.co/8NP3ZJOIOs

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

This fact was widely acknowledged until recent years, when the corporate media swept it under the rug or called it "disinformation." There was a time when the top diplomats and the coldest Cold Warriors in the US warned against NATO expansion. https://t.co/0wxFeS553n

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

NATO, Ukraine, and the revival of Cold War tensions with Russia have been hot topics recently, but did you know that prominent diplomats and the coldest US Cold Warriors warned against expanding NATO before the first wave of expansion in the 1990s? 🧵 https://t.co/xvDv5WmPXh

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

Even the head of NATO at the time, Jens Stoltenberg, admitted that Putin drew up a draft treaty insisting on no NATO expansion eastward. Then he bragged about how NATO defied his wishes. Basically what they call us "conspiracy theorists" for saying. https://t.co/nAcZLAVNQi

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

"Putin sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement, and that was a precondition for him not to invade Ukraine." Said by a Russian agent, right? Nope, that was NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg. https://t.co/bcJsDjK0qS

Video Transcript AI Summary
In autumn 2021, President Putin proposed a draft treaty demanding NATO promise not to expand further and to withdraw military infrastructure from Eastern European member states. This was presented as a condition to avoid invading Ukraine. NATO rejected these demands, leading to increased military presence in Eastern Europe instead. Ultimately, Putin's actions resulted in the opposite of his intentions, with NATO expanding closer to Russia's borders.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what what he sent us. And that was that that was a precondition for not invade, Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe. We should remove NATO from from that of of our alliance, introducing some kind of E and B or second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent, NATO, more NATO close to its borders. He has he he has got the exact opposite. He has got more NATO presence in the eastern part of the alliance.
ivan_8848
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 1:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin's 2007 Munich speech highlighted several warnings that have since come to fruition. He criticized NATO's eastward expansion, which has continued and contributed to the Ukraine crisis. He also foresaw the consequences of the US's unchecked military actions, which have led to conflicts in various regions. Additionally, he predicted an arms race due to NATO's treaty refusals, a reality underscored by recent treaty withdrawals and military developments in outer space. Lastly, he noted the shift from a unipolar to a multipolar world, exemplified by the expansion of BRICS.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Putin’s HISTORIC 2007 Munich speech: 18 years later, his warnings are now reality https://t.co/JzmJQQ3G7L The Russian president demonstrated remarkable foresight, with many of his warnings now realized 18 years after his impactful speech at the Munich Security Conference. 🪖 NATO’s eastward expansion 🗣 What Putin said: NATO’s expansion, in violation of post-Warsaw Pact assurances, undermines European security and provokes distrust 📹 Reality: NATO expanded several times afterwards, with Finland (2023) and Sweden (2024) the latest to join. This expansion, particularly toward Russia’s borders, contributed to the Ukraine crisis 🌎US’ destructive global military pursuits 🗣 What Putin said: The US’ unchecked military power would lead to human tragedies, wars, and regional conflicts 📹 Reality: Since 2007, the US has waged military operations in Somalia, Libya, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and fueled tensions with China in the South China Sea ⚔️ Alarming arms race 🗣 What Putin said: NATO’s refusal to ratify the 1999 Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty and US missile defense proposals would ignite a new arms race, including in outer space 📹 Reality: The US withdrew from the INF Treaty (2019), Open Skies Treaty (2020), and faces an uncertain future for the New START Treaty. Meanwhile, weapons are flooding Ukraine, and outer space is now a military domain. 🌐 Unipolarity 🗣 What Putin said: The unipolar world order, led by the US and its allies, is undemocratic and self-destructive 📹 Reality: A multipolar world is emerging, with new power centers like BRICS, which has now expanded to 10 members

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Putin's Prophecy Comes True‼️ Greatest National Leader of Our Time Putin's 2007 Munich Speech: Stark Prophecy or Reasonable Warning That Fell on Deaf Ears? PHENOMINAL speech. EVERYONE needs to hear it! https://t.co/Ww7JXje10G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спасибо большое. The international security landscape is far broader than military issues; it encompasses economic stability, poverty reduction, and intercultural dialogue. The Cold War left behind ideological stereotypes and double standards, and the attempted imposition of a unipolar world has failed. A unipolar world, with a single center of power, is neither acceptable nor feasible; it lacks a moral foundation and has generated new conflicts and human tragedies. The disregard for international law and the excessive use of force are destabilizing factors. The economic rise of countries like China and India reinforces multipolarity. We must work towards a balance of interests, reviving disarmament dialogue and ensuring the universal application of international law. The expansion of NATO raises concerns, and we need responsible partners committed to building a just and democratic world order for all. We support the peaceful use of nuclear technology but oppose its proliferation. Economic security requires fair competition and the rejection of political manipulation of energy prices. Russia is committed to playing a constructive role on the global stage while maintaining its independent foreign policy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Спасибо большое, уважаемая госпожа федеральный канцлер, господин Тельчик. Дамы и господа, Весьма признателен за приглашение на столь представительную конференцию, собравшую политиков, военных, предпринимателей, экспертов из более чем 40 стран мира. Формат конференции дает мне возможность избежать излишнего политеса и необходимости говорить округлыми, приятными, но пустыми дипломатическими штампами. Формат конференции позволяет сказать то, что я действительно думаю о проблемах международной безопасности. И если мои рассуждения покажутся нашим коллегам излишне полемически заостренными, либо неточными, я прошу на меня не сердиться, это ведь только конференция. Я надеюсь, что после двух-трех минут моего выступления господин Пельчак не включит там красный свет. Итак, известно, что проблематика международной безопасности много шире вопросов военно-политической стабильности. Это устойчивость мировой экономики, преодоление бедности, экономическая безопасность и развитие межцивилизационного диалога. Такой всеобъемлющий неделимый характер безопасности выражен и в её базовом принципе. Безопасность каждого это безопасность всех. Как сказал ещё в первые дни разгоравшейся Второй мировой войны Франклин Рузвельт, где бы ни был нарушен мир, мир повсюду оказывается в безопасности и под угрозой. Эти слова продолжают сохранять актуальность и сегодня. Об этом, кстати, свидетельствует и тема нашей конференции, которая здесь написана Глобальные кризисы, глобальная ответственность. Всего лишь два десятилетия назад мир был идеологически и экономически расколот, а его безопасность обеспечивали огромные стратегические потенциалы двух сверхдержав. Глобальное противостояние отодвигало на периферию международных отношений и повестки дня крайне острые экономические и социальные вопросы. И как всякая война война холодная оставила нам и неразорвавшиеся снаряды, образно выражаясь. Имею в виду идеологические стереотипы, двойные стандарты, иные шаблоны блокового мышления. Предлагавшийся же после холодной войны однополярный мир тоже не состоялся. История человечества, конечно, знает и периоды однополярного состояния, и стремления к мировому господству. Чего только не было в истории человечества. Однако, что же такое однополярный мир? Как бы не украшали этот термин, он в конечном итоге означает на практике только одно Это один центр власти, один центр силы, один центр принятия решения. Это мир одного хозяина, одного суверена, и это в конечном итоге губительно не только для всех, кто находится в рамках этой системы, но и для самого суверена, потому что разрушает его изнутри. И это ничего общего не имеет, конечно, с демократией, потому что демократия это, как известно, власть большинства при учете интересов и мнения меньшинства. Кстати говоря, Россию нас постоянно учат демократии, Но те, кто нас учат, сами почему-то учиться не очень хотят. Считаю, что для современного мира однополярная модель не только неприемлема, но и вообще невозможна. И не только потому, что при единоличном лидерстве в современном, именно в современном мире не будет хватать ни военно-политических, ни экономических ресурсов. Но, что еще важнее, сама модель является неработающей, так как в ее основе нет и не может быть морально-нравственной базы современной цивилизации. Вместе с тем, все, что происходит сегодня в мире, и сейчас мы только вот начали дискутировать об этом, это следствие попыток внедрения именно этой концепции в мировые дела, концепции однополярного мира. А какой результат? Односторонние, нелегитимные часто действия не решили ни одной проблемы. Более того, они стали генератором новых человеческих трагедий и очагов напряженности. Судите сами, Войн локальных и региональных конфликтов меньше не стало. Господин Тельчик вот об этом очень мягко упомянул. И людей в этих конфликтах гибнет не меньше, а даже больше, чем раньше. Значительно больше, значительно больше. Сегодня мы наблюдаем почти ничем не сдерживаемое, гипертрофированное применение силы в международных делах, военной силы. Силы, ввергающие мир в пучину следующих один за другим конфликтов. В результате не хватает сил на комплексное решение ни одного из них. Становится невозможным и их политическое решение. Мы видим все большее пренебрежение основополагающими принципами международного права. Больше того, отдельные нормы, да по сути чуть ли не вся система права одного государства, прежде всего конечно в Соединенных Штатах, перешагнула свои национальные границы и по сути во всех сферах и в экономике, и в политике, и в гуманитарной сфере навязывается другим государствам. Ну кому это понравится? В международных делах все чаще встречаются стремления решить тот или иной вопрос исходя из так называемой политической целесообразности, основанной на текущей политической конъюнктуре. И это, конечно, крайне опасно и ведет к тому, что никто уже не чувствует себя в безопасности. Я хочу это подчеркнуть: никто не чувствует себя в безопасности, потому что никто не может спрятаться за международным правом, как за каменной стеной. Такая политика является, конечно, катализатором гонки вооружений. Доминирование фактора силы неизбежно подпитывает тягу ряда стран к обладанию оружием массового уничтожения. Более того, появились принципиально новые угрозы, которые и раньше были известны, но сегодня приобретают глобальный характер, такие как терроризм. Убежден, мы подошли к тому рубежному моменту, когда должны серьезно задуматься над всей архитектурой глобальной безопасности. И здесь надо отталкиваться от поиска разумного баланса между интересами всех субъектов международного общения. Тем более сейчас, когда международный ландшафт столь ощутимо и столь быстро меняется. Меняется за счет динамичного развития целого ряда государств и регионов. Госпожа федеральный канцлер упомянул уже об этом. Так, суммарный ВВП Индии и Китая по паритетной покупательной способности уже больше, чем у Соединенных Штатов Америки. А рассчитанный по тому же принципу ВВП государств группы БРИК превосходит совокупный ВВП Евросоюза. И по оценкам экспертов, в обозримой исторической перспективе этот разрыв будет только возрастать. Не стоит сомневаться, что экономический потенциал новых центров мирового роста будет неизбежно конвертироваться в политическое влияние и укреплять будет многополярность. В этой связи серьезно возрастает роль многосторонней дипломатии. Открытость, транспарентность и предсказуемость политики безальтернативны, а применение силы должно быть действительно исключительной мерой, так же, как и применение смертной казни в правовых системах некоторых государств. Сегодня же мы, наоборот, наблюдаем ситуацию, когда страны, в которых применение смертной казни запрещено даже в отношении убийц и других преступников, опасных преступников. Несмотря на это, такие страны легко идут на участие в военных операциях, которые трудно назвать легитимными. А ведь в этих конфликтах гибнут люди, сотни, тысячи мирных людей. Но в то же время возникает вопрос, разве мы должны безучастно и безвольно взирать на различные внутренние конфликты в отдельных странах, на действия авторитарных режимов, тиранов, на распространение оружия массового уничтожения. Именно это и лежало в основе вопроса, который был задан федеральному канцлеру нашим уважаемым коллегой господином Либерманом. Я правильно понял ваш вопрос? И конечно это вопрос серьезный. Можем ли мы безучастно смотреть на то, что происходит? Я попробую ответить на ваш вопрос тоже. Конечно, мы не должны смотреть безучастно, конечно нет. Но есть ли у нас средства, чтобы противостоять этим угрозам? Конечно, есть. Достаточно вспомнить недавнюю историю. Ведь произошел же мирный переход к демократии в нашей стране. Ведь состоялась же мирная трансформация советского режима. Мирная трансформация. И какого режима? С каким количеством оружия, в том числе ядерного оружия? Почему же сейчас при каждом удобном случае нужно бомбить и стрелять? Неужели в условиях отсутствия угрозы взаимного уничтожения нам не хватает политической культуры, уважения к ценностям демократии и к праву? Убеждён, единственным механизмом принятия решения по использованию военной силы, как последнего довода, может быть только уставован. И в этой связи я или не понял то, что было сказано вот совсем недавно нашим коллегой министром обороны Италии, либо он выразился неточно. Я, во всяком случае, услышал, что легитимным применение силы может считаться только в том случае, если решение принято в НАТО или в Евросоюзе, или в ООН. Если он действительно так считает, то у нас с ним разные точки зрения или я ослышался. Легитимным можно считать применение силы только если решение принято на основе и в рамках ООН. И не надо применять Организацию Объединенных Наций ни НАТО, ни Евросоюзу. И когда ООН будет реально объединять силы международного сообщества, которое может действительно действительно может реагировать на события в отдельных странах. Когда мы избавимся от пренебрежения международным правом, то ситуация может измениться. В противном случае ситуация будет заходить лишь в тупик и умножать количество тяжелых ошибок. При этом, конечно, нужно добиваться того, чтобы международное право имело универсальный характер и в понимании, и в применении норм. И нельзя забывать, что демократический образ действий в политике обязательно предполагает дискуссию и кропотливую выработку решений. Уважаемые дамы и господа, потенциальная опасность дестабилизации международных отношений связана и с очевидным застоем в области разоружения. Россия выступает за возобновление диалога по этому важнейшему вопросу. Важно сохранить устойчивость международно-правовой разоруженческой базы. При этом обеспечить преемственность процесса сокращения ядерных вооружений. Мы договорились с Соединенными Штатами Америки о сокращении наших ядерных потенциалов на стратегических носителях до 1700-2200 ядерных боезарядов к 31 декабря 2012 года. Россия намерена строго выполнять взятые на себя обязательства. Надеемся, что и наши партнеры будут действовать так же транспарентно и не будут откладывать на всякий случай, на черный день, лишнюю пару сотен ядерных боезарядов. И если сегодня новый министр обороны Соединенных Штатов здесь нам объявят, что Соединенные Штаты не будут прятать эти заряды лишние ни на складах, ни под подушкой, ни под одеялом, я предлагаю всем встать и стоя это поприветствовать. Это было бы очень важное заявление. Россия строго придерживается и намерена в дальнейшем придерживаться договора о нераспространении ядерного оружия и многостороннего режима контроля за ракетными технологиями. Принципы, заложенные в этих документах, носят универсальный характер. В этой связи хотел бы вспомнить, что в 80-е годы СССР и Соединенные Штаты подписали договор о ликвидации целого класса ракет средней и малой дальности. Но универсального характера этому документу придано не было. Сегодня такие ракеты уже имеют целый ряд стран: Корейская Народно-Демократическая Республика, Республика Корея, Индия, Иран, Пакистан, Израиль. Многие другие государства мира разрабатывают эти системы и планируют поставить их на вооружение. И только Соединенные Штаты Америки и Россия несут обязательство не создавать подобных систем вооружений. Ясно, что в этих условиях мы вынуждены задуматься об обеспечении своей собственной безопасности. Вместе с тем нельзя допустить появления новых достабилизирующих, высокотехнологичных видов оружия. Я уже не говорю о мерах по предупреждению новых сфер конфронтации, особенно в космосе. Звездные войны, как известно, уже не фантастика, а реальность. Еще в середине 80-х годов наши американские партнеры на практике провели перехват собственного спутника. Милитаризация космоса, по мнению России, может спровоцировать непредсказуемые для мирового сообщества последствия, не меньшие, чем начало ядерной эры. И мы не раз выступали с инициативами, направленными на недопущение оружия в космос. Сегодня хотел бы проинформировать вас о том, что нами подготовлен проект договора о предотвращении размещения оружия в космическом пространстве. В ближайшее время он будет направлен партнерам в качестве официального предложения. Давайте работать над этим вместе. Нас также не могут не тревожить планы по развертыванию элементов системы противоракетной обороны в Европе. Кому нужен очередной виток неизбежной в этом случае гонки вооружений? Глубоко сомневаюсь, что самим европейцам. Ракетного оружия, реально угрожающего Европе, с дальностью действия порядка 5-8 тысяч километров нет ни у одной так называемой из проблемных стран. И в будущем в обозримой перспективе и не появится, не предвидится даже. Да и гипотетический пуск, например, северокорейской ракеты по территории США через Западную Европу это явно противоречит законам баллистики. Как говорят у нас в России это все равно, что правой рукой дотягиваться до левого уха. И находясь здесь, в Германии, не могу не упомянуть и о кризисном состоянии договора об обычных вооруженных силах в Европе. Адаптированный договор об обычных вооруженных силах в Европе был подписан в 1999 году. Он учитывал новую геополитическую реальность ликвидацию Варшавского блока. С тех пор прошло 7 лет, и только четыре государства ратифицировали этот документ, включая Российскую Федерацию. Страны НАТО открыто заявили, что не ратифицируют договор, включая положения о фланговых ограничениях, о размещении на флангах определенного количества вооруженных сил до тех пор, пока Россия не выведет свои базы из Грузии и Молдавии. Из Грузии наши войска выводятся, причем даже в ускоренном порядке. Эти проблемы мы с нашими грузинскими коллегами решили, и это всем известно. В Молдавии остается группировка в 1500 военнослужащих, которые выполняют миротворческие функции и охраняют склады с боеприпасами, оставшиеся со времен СССР. И мы с господином Соланой обсуждаем постоянно этот вопрос, он знает нашу позицию, мы готовы и дальше работать по этому направлению. Но что же происходит в это же самое время? А в это самое время в Болгарии и Румынии появляются так называемые легкие американские передовые базы по 5000 штыков в каждой. Получается, что НАТО выдвигает свои передовые силы к нашим государственным границам, А мы, строго выполняя договор, никак не реагируем на эти действия. Думаю, очевидно, процесс НАТОвского расширения не имеет никакого отношения к модернизации самого Альянса или к обеспечению безопасности в Европе. Наоборот, это серьезно провоцирующий фактор, снижающий уровень взаимного доверия. И у нас есть справедливое право откровенно спросить против кого это расширение. И что стало с теми заверениями, которые давались западными партнерами после роспуска Варшавского договора? Где теперь эти заявления? О них даже никто не помнит, Но я позволю себе напомнить в этой аудитории, что было сказано. Хотел бы привести цитату из выступления генерального секретаря НАТО господина Вернера в Брюсселе 17 мая 1990 года. Он тогда сказал: Сам факт, что мы готовы не размещать войска НАТО за пределами территории ФРГ, дает Советскому Союзу твердые гарантии безопасности. Где эта гарантия? Камни и бетонные блоки берлинской стены давно разошлись на сувениры. Но нельзя забывать, что ее падение стало возможным в том числе и благодаря историческому выбору, в том числе нашего народа, народа России. Выбору в пользу демократии и свободы, открытости и искреннего партнерства со всеми членами большой европейской семьи. Сейчас же нам пытаются навязать уже новые разделительные линии и стены, пусть виртуальные, но все-таки разделяющие, разрезающие наш общий континент? Неужели вновь потребуются долгие годы и десятилетия смена нескольких поколений политиков, чтобы разобрать и демонтировать эти новые стены? Уважаемые дамы и господа, мы однозначно выступаем и за укрепление режима нераспространения. Существующая международно-правовая база позволяет создать технологии по выработке ядерного топлива для использования его в мирных целях. И многие страны с полным на то основанием хотят создавать собственную ядерную энергетику, как основу их энергетической независимости. Но мы также понимаем, что эти технологии могут быть быстро трансформированы в получение оружейных материалов. Это вызывает серьезное международное напряжение. Яркий тому пример ситуация с иранской ядерной программой. Если международное сообщество не выработает разумного решения этого конфликта интересов, мир и дальше будет потрясать подобные дестабилизирующие кризисы. Потому что пороговых стран больше, чем Иран. И мы с вами об этом знаем. Мы будем постоянно сталкиваться с угрозой распространения оружия массового уничтожения. В прошлом году Россия выступила с инициативой создания многонациональных центров по обогащению урана. Мы открыты к тому, чтобы подобные центры создавались не только в России, но и в других странах, где на легитимной основе существует мирная ядерная энергетика. Государства, желающие развивать атомную энергетику, могли бы гарантированно получать топливо через непосредственное участие в работе этих центров, конечно же, под строгим контролем МАГАТЭ. С российским предложением созвучны и последние инициативы президента США Джорджа Буша. Считаю, что Россия и США объективно и в одинаковой степени заинтересованы в ужесточении режимов нераспространения оружия массового уничтожения и средств его доставки. Именно наши страны, являющиеся лидерами по ядерному и ракетному потенциалу, должны стать и лидерами в разработке новых, более жестких мер в сфере нераспространения. Россия готова к такой работе, мы ведем консультации с нашими американскими друзьями. В целом, речь должна идти о создании целой системы политических рычагов и экономических стимулов. Стимулов, при которых государства были бы заинтересованы не создавать собственные мощности ядерного топливного цикла, но имели бы возможность развивать атомную энергетику, укрепляя свой энергетический потенциал. В этой связи подробнее остановлюсь на международном энергетическом сотрудничестве. Госпожа федеральный канцлер тоже об этом коротко, но упомянула, затронула эту тему. В энергетической сфере Россия ориентируется на создание единых для всех рыночных принципов и прозрачных условий. Очевидно, что цена на энергоносители должна определяться рынком, а не являться предметом политических спекуляций, экономического давления или шантажа. Мы открыты для сотрудничества. Зарубежные компании участвуют в наших крупнейших энергетических проектах. По различным оценкам до 26% добычи нефти в России, вдумайтесь в эту цифру, пожалуйста, до 26% добычи нефти в России приходится на иностранный капитал. Попробуйте, попробуйте привести мне пример подобного широкого присутствия российского бизнеса в ключевых отраслях экономики западных государств. Нет таких примеров. Таких примеров нет. Напомню также о соотношении инвестиций, поступающих в Россию и идущих из России в другие страны мира. Соотношение примерно 15 к 1. Вот вам зримый пример открытости и стабильности российской экономики. Экономическая безопасность это сфера, где всем следует придерживаться единых принципов. Мы готовы честно конкурировать. Для этого у российской экономики появляется всё больше возможностей. Такую динамику объективно оценивают эксперты и наши зарубежные партнеры. Так, недавно был повышен рейтинг России в ОАЭСР. Из четвертой группы риска наша страна перешла в третью. И хотел бы, пользуясь случаем, здесь сегодня в Мюнхене поблагодарить наших немецких коллег за содействие в принятии вышеназванного решения. Далее, как вы знаете, процесс присоединения России к ВТО вышел на финальную стадию. Отмечу, что в ходе долгих, непростых переговоров слова о свободе, мы не расслышали слова о свободе слова, о свободе торговли, о равных возможностях, но почему-то исключительно применительно к нашему, к российскому рынку. И еще одна важная тема, прямо влияющая на глобальную безопасность. Сегодня много говорят о борьбе с бедностью. Что здесь происходит на самом деле? С одной стороны, на программы помощи беднейшим странам выделяются финансовые ресурсы и подчас немаленькие финансовые ресурсы. Но по-честному, и здесь многие тоже это знают, зачастую под освоение компаниями самих же стран доноров. Но в то же время, с другой стороны, в развитых странах сохраняются субсидии в сельском хозяйстве, ограничивается для других доступ к высоким технологиям. И давайте называть вещи своими именами. Получается, что одной рукой раздается благотворительная помощь, а другой не только консервируется экономическая отсталость, а еще и собирается прибыль. Возникающее социальное напряжение в таких депрессивных регионах неизбежно выливаются в рост радикализма, экстремизма, подпитывая терроризм и локальные конфликты. А если все это вдобавок происходит, скажем, на Ближнем Востоке, в условиях обостренного восприятия внешнего мира как несправедливого, то возникает риск для глобальной дестабилизации. Очевидно, что ведущие страны мира должны видеть эту угрозу и, соответственно, выстраивать более демократическую, справедливую систему экономических отношений в мире. Систему, дающую всем шанс и возможность для развития. Выступая на конференции по безопасности, уважаемые дамы и господа, нельзя обойти молчанием и деятельность организации по безопасности и сотрудничеству в Европе. Как известно, она была создана, чтобы рассматривать все, я подчеркну это, все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами учредителей. Скроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций, формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСВ призваны оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем, но вовсе это не означает вмешательства во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и, наоборот, делает их зависимыми и, как следствие, нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия и транспарентности. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку. Вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. И, конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех. Благодарю вас за внимание.
ricwe123
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 7:01 AM
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 9:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The war in Ukraine began in 2014, following a coup that ousted President Yanukovych and led to the rise of a pro-Western government. This shift prompted Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk to seek independence. Despite Putin's attempts at peace through the Minsk Agreements, Western leaders undermined these efforts, using Ukraine as a pawn while supplying arms. For eight years, the Ukrainian military, supported by extremist groups, attacked Donbas civilians. NATO's expansion further escalated tensions, leaving Putin to intervene in defense of eastern Ukraine, while the Western media perpetuates a misleading narrative.

@ricwe123 - Richard

The war in Ukraine didn’t start in 2022,it began in 2014, when the West orchestrated a coup that toppled the democratically elected President Yanukovych and installed a corrupt, pro-Western puppet in Kyiv. That betrayal pushed Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk to break away from a regime they no longer recognized. Twice, Putin extended an olive branch through the Minsk Agreements. And twice, Merkel and Macron knowingly sabotaged any chance at peace, weaponizing Ukraine as a pawn to bait Russia while the West funneled in arms and stoked the fire. For eight years, the Ukrainian military,alongside neo-Nazi death squads,waged a brutal campaign against Donbas, slaughtering civilians whose only crime was rejecting Kyiv’s illegitimate rule. NATO’s reckless march eastward only poured fuel on the fire, and in the face of non-stop terror, Putin had no choice but to step in and defend the people of eastern Ukraine. But don’t expect the Western media to tell you the truth,they’re too busy selling propaganda.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
**Original Language Summary:** Снаряды, летящие в ЛДНР, сравниваются с Волынской резней. Утверждается, что националистические батальоны на Украине пытают людей, сдирая кожу с лица, как во время Волынской резни. Тактика украинских вооруженных сил на Донбассе якобы схожа с тактикой гитлеровских нацистов и бандеровцев. Утверждается, что потомки бандеровцев создали в ЛДНР концентрационные лагеря, где людей жестоко пытали: загоняли иголки под ногти, ломали руки, вбивали гвозди в черепа. Сообщается о существовании неофициальной тюрьмы на мариупольском аэродроме и концентрационного лагеря Правого сектора на реке Волчьей, где людей пытали. Утверждается, что в пыточной СБУ людей вешали на дыбу и пытали паяльной лампой. Сообщается о комнатах в Мариуполе, забитых обугленными телами. Утверждается, что украинские военные расстреливают мирное население, включая детей, в Донецке. **English Translation:** Shells flying into the LDNR are compared to the Volyn massacre. It is claimed that nationalist battalions in Ukraine torture people, flaying the skin from their faces, as during the Volyn massacre. The tactics of the Ukrainian armed forces in the Donbass are allegedly similar to the tactics of Hitler's Nazis and Bandera supporters. It is alleged that the descendants of Bandera supporters created concentration camps in the LDNR, where people were brutally tortured: needles were driven under their fingernails, arms were broken, and nails were hammered into their skulls. There are reports of the existence of an unofficial prison at the Mariupol airfield and a Right Sector concentration camp on the Volchya River, where people were tortured. It is alleged that in the SBU torture chamber, people were hung on the rack and tortured with a soldering iron. Reports of rooms in Mariupol filled with charred bodies. It is alleged that Ukrainian soldiers are shooting at civilians, including children, in Donetsk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Вот эти снаряды, которые сейчас летят в ЛДНР, это же ведь убийство. А что, нужно обязательно убивать так, как было в Волыни? Как это было во Львове? Speaker 1: Где вообще волынские? Это Speaker 0: же одно и то же, по большому счету. На них летят снаряды, их не жалеют ни на секунду. Но это же абсолютно те же самые методы. Принцип один и тот же. Массовое запугивание, сбор людей и посылается туда, внутрь этих людей, смерть. Ну скажите, в чем разница? Speaker 1: -Достаточное количество моих друзей сейчас воюют на территории Украины, они рассказывают достаточно страшные вещи, как ведут себя националистические батальоны. Например, заживость человека с лица снимают кожу. Такая практика активно использовалась во время Волынской резни. Speaker 2: А сколько там человек? Вы можете Вот Speaker 3: вы можете Speaker 2: Это сопоставимо с фактом, когда они расстреливали в Бабьем Яру. В Бабьеме Яром тоже известный фактор, что они не только немцы, там и бандеровцы развлекались. Speaker 4: Данные преступления были разрешены официально с самого начала Майдана. Если мы помним слова тех, кто выходил на трибуны Когда начался Майдан, провозглашалось одно, что едина Украина, украинский язык, люди мыслят не так, они должны быть уничтожены. Наша Speaker 2: повстанша хода только начинается, так? Speaker 1: Тактика применения вооруженных сил, которую мы имеем на Донбассе, особенно в отношении гражданского мирного населения, она мало чем отличается от тактики и гитлеровских нацистов, и бандеровцев времён Второй мировой войны. То, что мы видели на протяжении восьми лет с 2014 года на юго-востоке Украины, это очень и очень похоже. Speaker 0: Вот эти ребята, потомки националистов, бандеровцев, начали с лихвой активно воспринимать эти постулаты, на которых они были воспитаны. -Националистические постулаты. Это привело к тому, что на территории ЛДНР появились концентрационные лагеря, где с особой жестокостью людей пытали. Загонялись иголки под ногти, ломались руки, вбивались гвозди в черепа. Speaker 5: В мариупольском аэродроме с июня 2014 года функционировала библиотека. Это вот неофициальная тюрьма, которой нет. Туда всех задержанных и привозили. -Ну, тут держали, в маленькой комнате, вот сюда больше женщин закрывали, кто Speaker 3: большой мужчина. У меня на правой руке вот тут не было кожи. Вот она полосочка, это меня пытались полностью снять живем в школу. Днепропетровская область, Донецкая и Запорожская. Вот такое пересечение. И там, на реке Волчьей, пионерский лагерь. Его территории перевалочная фаза Правого сектора, где в подвале и был организован концентрационный лагерь. Speaker 4: -Правый сектор сделал там лагерь. Людей там вообще не считали за людей. Speaker 3: Все знали о том, что существует пыточная СБУ. То есть там было все оборудовано цепями, там была дыба. На эту дыбу вешали людей и просто вставляли включенную паяльную лампу. До тех пор, пока во рту не будет кипеть кровь. Speaker 4: Практически в живых людей снимали кожу, когда подвешивали на дыбу, когда пытали током, когда пытали водой, когда на дыбе человек мог висеть, это просто в застенках СБУ, мог висеть часами, истекая кровью и умирая на этой дыбе. Было много концлагерей, о которых предстоит узнать. Предстоит узнать их историю и историю тех людей, которые там были убиты, растерзаны и даже не похоронены. Speaker 0: Что происходило в Мариуполе, мы не знаем. Есть комнаты забитые обугленными телами. Кто эти люди? Пока мы не проведем расследование понять это просто невозможно. Speaker 2: Они расстреливают свое собственное население, вот они расстреливают, например, Донецк. Там мирные жители, в том числе и дети. Ну сколько уже детей погибло?
GUnderground_TV
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Saved - August 15, 2025 at 2:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe we wouldn't have taken any action if it weren't for the Maidan coup. We accepted Russia's 1991 borders, but we never agreed to NATO's expansion or Ukraine joining NATO. It's crucial for Trump to grasp this before the summit with Putin, as it underpins the Ukraine proxy war.

@GUnderground_TV - Going Underground

Vladimir Putin: 'We would have never considered to even lift a finger if it hadn't been for the Maidan coup. We had agreed to Russia's 1991 borders...but we never agreed to NATO's expansion and we never agreed that Ukraine would be in NATO' Trump must understand ahead of the summit with Putin that this is the root cause of the Ukraine proxy war

Video Transcript AI Summary
That is exactly what the miscalculation is. CIA did its job to complete the coup. It cost almost 5,000,000,000, but the political mistake was colossal. This could have been done legally, without victims, without military action, without losing Crimea; we would have never considered lifting a finger if it hadn't been for bloody developments on Maidan. We agreed after the Soviet collapse that borders should be along the borders of former union republics, but we never agreed to NATO's expansion or that Ukraine would be in NATO. We did not agree to NATO bases there without discussion. For decades we asked, don't do this. What triggered the latest events? Firstly, the Ukrainian leadership declared they would not implement the Minsk agreements. A year or so ago, former leaders of Germany and France said they signed the Minsk agreements but never intended to implement them; they led us by the nose.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is exactly what the miscalculation is. CIA did its job to complete the coup. I think one of the deputy secretaries of state said that it cost a large sum of money, almost 5,000,000,000. But the political mistake was colossal. Why would they have to do that? All this could have been done legally, without victims, without military action, without losing Crimea. We would have never considered to even lift a finger if it hadn't been for the bloody developments on Maidan. Because we agreed with the fact that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, our borders should be along the borders of former unions' republics. We agreed to that. But we never agreed to NATO's expansion, and moreover, we never agreed that Ukraine would be in NATO. We did not agree to NATO bases there without any discussion with us. For decades, we kept asking, don't do this, don't do that. And what triggered the latest events? Firstly, the current Ukrainian leadership declared that it would not implement the Minsk agreements, which had been signed, as you know, after the events of 2014 in Minsk, where the plan of peaceful settlement in Donbas was set forth. But no, the current Ukrainian leadership, foreign minister, all other officials, and then president himself said that they don't like anything about the Minsk agreements. In other words, they were not going to implement it. A year or a year and a half ago, former leaders of Germany and France said openly to the whole world that they indeed signed the Minsk agreements, but they never intended to implement them. They simply led us by the nose.

@afshinrattansi - Afshin Rattansi

🇷🇺🇺🇸ICYMI: Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on if the Trump-Putin Summit will be a success: ‘Russia has put on the table for years its terms for coming to an end of this war. Basically, Russia has said it has national security concerns. The expansion of NATO was the cause of the war in Ukraine. The US-led coup in February 2014 was the provocation that led onward to war in Ukraine. If Trump comes to this meeting with honesty and says yes, the United States should stop provoking Russia, stop trying to weaken Russia, stop trying to divide Russia, then there could be peace. If the President comes, as he is wont to do, with the demands, “you must stop this and that”, there will not be peace, there will be ongoing war, and probably the meeting will not be at all what we would hope. So I don’t think we know right now until this meeting happens. The problem is we have an intemperate President, absolutely without any kind of stability, who does not speak to the public and who does not engage in any kind of political deliberation. He just makes orders. So this is a big problem.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 hopes for a Trump–Putin meeting but notes, "As usual, we have no public information or public explanation of anything from the White House." He adds, "we, live in, not in a democracy, but in an imperium right now, one person rule." Russia's terms are laid out: "Russia has put on the table for years, actually, its terms for coming to an end of this war. Basically, Russia has said, that it has national security concerns. The expansion of NATO was the cause of the war in Ukraine. The US led coup in February 2014 was the provocation that led onward to war in Ukraine." He contends, "If Trump comes to this meeting with the honesty and says, yes, The United States should stop provoking Russia, stop trying to weaken Russia, stop trying to divide Russia, then there could be peace." Conversely, "If the president comes as he is want to do with demands. You must stop this and that. There will not be peace." "The problem is we have a intemperate president absolutely, without any kind of stability who does not speak to the public, and who does not engage in any kind of political deliberation. He just makes orders."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Suddenly out of a hat, we hear that the, perhaps most, existential, question of our time will be debated between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin this week. What do you make of it? Speaker 1: I I hope it's a good news that they're meeting. As usual, we have no public information or public explanation of anything from the White House. We, live in, not in a democracy, but in an imperium right now, one person rule and, either, we hear from true social something or we're a little bit befuddled. So when you ask what is this upcoming meeting mean, does it mean, that The United States is gonna get serious about diplomacy? I don't know. Russia has put on the table for years, actually, its terms for coming to an end of this war. Basically, Russia has said, that it has national security concerns. The expansion of NATO was the cause of the war in Ukraine. The US led coup in February 2014 was the provocation that led onward to war in Ukraine. If Trump comes to this meeting with the honesty and says, yes, The United States should stop provoking Russia, stop trying to weaken Russia, stop trying to divide Russia, then there could be peace. If the president comes as he is want to do with demands. You must stop this and that. There will not be peace. There will be ongoing war, and, probably, the meeting, will will be, not at all what we would hope. So I don't think we know right now, until this meeting happens. The problem is we have a intemperate president absolutely, without any kind of stability who does not speak to the public, and who does not engage in any kind of political deliberation. He just makes orders. So this is a big problem.
JohnMcCloy
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Saved - August 17, 2025 at 7:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In an interview with Oliver Stone, Putin expressed his belief that the Cold War had ended but revealed U.S. support for Muslim Chechens to destabilize Russia. He recounted how George Bush was upset upon learning this but received a dismissive response from the CIA. Putin criticized Gorbachev for not securing a written agreement on NATO expansion. He emphasized the desire for a unipolar world led by the U.S. This context fuels my belief that forces are working against President Trump’s peace efforts, as he embodies a threat to the elite. I believe Trump will be remembered as a great president and that the upcoming Anchorage summit will be historic.

@JohnMcCloy - Johnny St.Pete

🔥WOW. Putin tells Oliver Stone during an interview that he believed that Cold War was over but then reveals that our United States OPS were supporting the MUSLIM Chechens to destabilize Russia. When he brought it up to George Bush w/ names & proof he said Bush was upset to find this out and said he would look into it. Instead he got a letter from the CIA that told him to kick rocks lol. He then goes on to criticize Gorbachev for never getting in writing the agreement for NATO promising to stop expanding. One of the most telling parts is at the end when giving a speech in Munich in 2007 to Security Conference w/ European and American leaders he highlights the desire for implies essentially the U.S./NATO/EU to have ONE UNIPOLAR CENTER OF AUTHORITY, FORCE & DECISION MAKING…ONE MASTER..ONE SOVEREIGN… This is why I firmly believe there are many forces trying to Prevent President Trump making peace. And it also underscores why they hate populism and Trump represents a threat to the elite cabal. Nothing else explains WHY he has been treated this way for decades. He also represents US and our freedoms and liberty. President Trump will go down as our greatest President & I believe he learned so much from his first term that we will make peace despite the forces against him. Anchorage is going to be a historic summit and we are WALKING IN HISTORY.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Автор утверждает, что во времена проблем на Кавказе США поддержали эти процессы и что, хотя Холодная война прошла, американские спецслужбы якобы поддерживали террористов для раскачки внутри России. Партнёры на словах обещали сотрудничество и борьбу с терроризмом, но на деле использовали террористов; есть доказательства оперативной и финансовой поддержки, включая случаи, когда называли фамилии сотрудников США, перемещавших боевиков. Буш заявил: «Я с этим разберусь». Позже пришло письмо из Центрального управления США, где коллеги считают себя вправе поддерживать отношения со всеми представителями оппозиции и будут это делать дальше. Речь идёт о террористических структурах, а не об оппозиции. Об объединении Германии: восточная граница НАТО не зафиксирована на бумаге; Горбачёв сделал ошибку. НАТО нужен внешний враг; создаётся образ противостояния между блоками: Варшавский договор и Советский Союз исчезли. The author argues that during problems in the Caucasus the United States supported these processes and that, although the Cold War has ended, American intelligence allegedly supported terrorists to destabilize Russia from within. Partners publicly promised cooperation and the fight against terrorism, but in reality used terrorists; there is evidence of operational and financial support, including cases where the names of U.S. personnel moving fighters were cited. Bush stated: 'I will deal with this.' Later came a letter from the Central Administration of the United States, where colleagues claim they are entitled to maintain relations with all opposition figures and will continue to do so. The discussion concerns terrorist structures, not opposition. On German reunification: the eastern border of NATO was not fixed on paper; Gorbachov made a mistake. NATO needs an external enemy; a confrontation between blocs is being constructed: the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union disappeared.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Когда у нас начались проблемы в Чечне, на Кавказе на Северном, к сожалению, американцы поддержали эти процессы. Холодная война вошла в прошлое, у нас ясные, прозрачные отношения со всем миром, с Европой, с Соединенными Штатами. И, конечно, мы рассчитывали на поддержку. Вместо этого мы увидели, что американские спецслужбы как раз поддерживают террористов. И я вам сейчас скажу, на мой взгляд, важную вещь. У нас сложилось абсолютно устойчивое мнение, тогда, не нам, тогда, Что наши партнеры американские на словах говорят о поддержке России, говорят о необходимой готовности к сотрудничеству, в том числе о борьбе с терроризмом, а на самом деле используют этих террористов для раскачки внутриполитической ситуации в России. Ведь вторая, так называемая, Вторая чеченская война началась с того, что именно народ, гражданские лица в Дагестане, а это тоже мусульманская республика, взяли в руки оружие и Speaker 1: оказали сопротивление, дали отпор. Speaker 0: Конечно, но что касается информационной и политической поддержки, то это не доказательствах, это было очевидно для всех. Это же публично делалось открыто. А что касается оперативной поддержки, финансовой, у нас есть такие доказательства. Более того, некоторые из мы представили нашим американским коллегам. Был даже такой момент, когда я к президенту Бушу сказал об этом и показал им. Он назвал даже фамилии сотрудников спецслужб США, которые работали на Кавказе и не просто оказывали какую-то общую политическую поддержку, а оказывали техническую поддержку. Перебрасывали боевиков из одного места на другой шанс. Реакция президента США была очень правильной и очень негативной. Она сказала: Я с этим разберусь. Мы позднее получили по партнерским каналам действительно письмо из Центрального развития управления США, в котором было указано, что наши коллеги считают себя вправе поддерживать отношения со всеми представителями оппозиции и будут это делать дальше. Ясно было, что речь-то идет не просто об оппозиционных силах, речь идет о террористических структурах организации. Но тем не менее их представляли в виде какой-то обыкновенной оппозиции. Speaker 1: И Speaker 0: я Я думаю, что это было бы не очень прилично достаточно, так что я сказал. Я думаю, что Джордж помнит наши и Speaker 1: Литвия, Литвауэния, Румыния, Словакия и Словения, мы благодарим и Speaker 0: Тогда, когда решался вопрос об объединении Германии и о последующем выводе советских войск из Восточной Европы, тогда официальные лица и в Соединенных Штатах и генеральный секретарь НАТО, по-моему это был господин Вернер, тогда все говорили, что в одном Советский Союз может быть уверен восточная граница НАТО не будет отодвинута дальше, чем сегодняшняя восточная граница германской демократической республики. Это не было зафиксировано на бумаге. Это ошибка, но уже со стороны Горбачева. В политике нужно вещи фиксировать, даже фиксированные вещи часто нарушают. А он просто поговорил и решил, что всё на этом закончено. Это не так. Speaker 1: Она была создана, когда шла конфронтация между двумя блоками Восточной блоком Западной, между двумя лагерями. Теперь нет Варшавского договора, нет никакого восточного блока, даже нет Советского Союза. Или это вопрос о надо узнать? Создается впечатление, что для того, чтобы оправдать сам факты своего существования, НАТО нужен внешний враг. И осуществляется постоянный поиск этого врага или какие-то провокационные действия для того, чтобы кого-то назвать этим врагом. Speaker 0: И Speaker 1: я центр власти, Speaker 0: принятие решения. Это мир одной из этих технологий. Это мир одной из этих технологий. Это и я
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 20, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 12:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the complex relationship between Putin and Jewish influence in global politics. I trace Putin's rise from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the perceived exploitation by Jewish oligarchs under Yeltsin, leading to Putin's crackdown on them. I argue that Western media and politicians, often linked to Jewish interests, have portrayed Putin as a dictator while ignoring his efforts to protect Russian sovereignty. I suggest that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the portrayal of Putin are influenced by these dynamics, advocating for a leader like him to counter perceived external control.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why do the jews hate Putin? Why does the mass media spend so Much time trying to rile up the masses to go to war with him? Why does Mark Levin, Brian Krassentein, and Ben Shapiro do everything they can to tell us opposing Putin is in “our interest.” I’ll tell you why. 🧵 1/18 https://t.co/DWNNXAhn73

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

First we must go back and see the roots of what led to Putins rise to power. Remember that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The process of “liberalization” and turning Russias communist economy into a capitalist economy was left up to the planted Jewish puppet, Boris Yeltsin. As you can see he was president from 1991-1999. 🧵 2/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here is one Jewish puppet besides another… (Yeltsin/ Clinton) and you can see how they were working together for the “new world order of the west. -discussions of economic prosperity for Russia -American investment -Nuclear arms deals -Expansion of NATO.. Many may not remember, but when Bill Clinton was not sleeping with Mossad spy Monica Lewinsky, he was very much serving Jewish foreign policy with his overrepresented Jewish leadership in that area… (Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, William Cohen, Victoria Nuland, etc) 🧵 3/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works." "We want Russia to be involved in it." "We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it." "We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that." "So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working." "That is all I can tell you." "The more we say about it, the worse it'll be." "We are moving toward peace." "The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia." "That has not been done yet." "There is no relationship between two"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works. We want Russia to be involved in it. We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it. We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that. So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working. That is all I can tell you. The more we say about it, the worse it'll be. We are moving toward peace. The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia. That has not been done yet. There is no relationship between two
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines three outcomes: (1) there will be a NATO-Russia agreement that all the leaders will support; although they disagree on expansion, they agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. (2) the notion that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions, and that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. (3) they resolved a number of roadblocks relating to START II and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of START II and we would together support guidelines for START III, which we would hope could be negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results. Speaker 1: Just a moment. you've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Different. One, the idea that there will be a NATO Russia agreement that all the leaders will support. That's a significant thing. We agree to disagree about the question of expansion, but we agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. Two, the the notion that that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions. And that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. And third, and I think almost unexpected even among us, we were working along here hoping this would happen. We resolved a number of roadblocks relating to start two and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of start two and we would together support guidelines for START three, which we would hope could be, negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results, and I'm very pleased with them. Wolf? Speaker 1: Just a moment. I'd like to continue for a second longer. You've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. Well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
Video Transcript AI Summary
“I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform.” He notes that in 1993 versus 1992 “the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income,” “inflation was brought down,” and “the stabilization of the currency was improved.” He supports further integrating the Russian economy into a global market system, acknowledges dislocations, and urges assistance so the Russian people know there is effort to address these problems. He predicts benefits will flow in the coming year as trade and investment expand and stresses the need for a social safety net and retraining. He says the people of Russia have to define their own future and rejects the idea that the US directs policy, declaring that as long as we share “the same values and the same vision” he wants to be “an equal partner” because “the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform. If you look at 1993 as compared with 1992, If you look at how much the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income, if you look at how much inflation was brought down, if you look at how much the stabilization of the currency was improved. I think that the continued work toward hooking the Russian economy into a global economic system based on markets is a very sound thing. The we had great long talks about what could be done and what kind of assistance The United States and others could provide to recognize that there are certain dislocations which come from these changes so that the the people of Russia will know that there is an effort being made to deal with those problems. But I also have to tell you that I believe that that the people will begin to benefit in ways that they could not see perhaps last year in the coming year when we have more trade and more investment. And as people around the world and and in The United States in particular see that the president is serious about this, I think the benefits will begin to flow. That plus constructing the kind of social support system and job retraining, unemployment, all those things that just have to be put together and are not easy to put together when you don't have one. I think these things will help a lot. The other point I'd like to make to you sir, is that from my point of view, President Yeltsin has been unfairly criticized in some quarters for his relationship with The United States. The implication that somehow we have tried to direct the course of Russian policy or it is just not accurate and not true. The people of Russia have to define their own future. All I have tried to do is to say that as long as we share the same values and the same vision, as long as we share a dream of of political freedom and economic freedom and respect for our neighbors, I want to be an equal partner because I believe this is a very great nation and that the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed. So I think our relationships in that sense have been quite correct all along and some have sought to miss, characterize them in a way that I think is not accurate.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Speaker 1: Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. Speaker 2: And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here. Speaker 0: Later that day, Clinton received a warmer reception from Boris Yeltsin Yeltsin and issued a warning about Putin. Speaker 3: Bill Clinton looked hard into Yeltsin's eyes and said, I'm a little bit concerned about this young man that you have turned over the presidency to. He doesn't have democracy in his heart. And I will never forget the fa the expression that came over Yeltsin. Speaker 0: Yeltsin's confidants say by the end of his life, he would come to agree with Clinton. Speaker 3: Before Boris Yeltsin died, he told intimates that it was a great mistake for him to have selected Putin as his successor.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Well what’s the problem? Didn’t the Russian people love NATO expansion, economic liberalism, and de-nuclearization? As usual, the United States “sells liberalism” but what they mean is economic exploiting by Jewish capitalist. And Russia was no different. It didn’t take long for the “Semibankirschina” (7 bankers) to own a majority of the assets, and they exploited the Russian people accordingly. And yes most of them were Jews. 🧵 4/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This led into the Russian financial crisis, and ultimately paved the way for a more nationalistic leader to come in. The people were aware of who their exploiters were. They also saw how chummy Yeltsin was with these Jewish oligarchs. Yeltsin was nervous he would be killed during the political unrest, so he needed a strong leader to take over for him, that would also agree to “pardon him.” That politically savvy, and strong leader, was Vladimir Putin. 🧵 5/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the first things Putin did as president was meet with 20 or so of the rich men in Russia. (The predominantly Jewish oligarchs.) He told them flat out, the days of exploitation are done. They could still be rich, but they would have to stay out of his way, and the people would be served first. 🧵 6/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now, these Jewish billionaires did not take to that too kindly, but they shortly found out that Putin was not someone they could simply buy with money, or blackmail with Jeffrey Epstein schemes. Putin started dismantling these Jewish oligarchs from power one by one… -Vladimir Gusinsky -Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Khordorkovsky- Jew ✡️ -Boris Berezovsky- Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Prokhorov- Jew ✡️ This isn’t to say, he randomly singled out Jewish oligarchs. There are still Russian Jewish oligarchs today, but they respect the power that Putin holds. He only went after the ones that were undermining him and Russia, and in doing so he was able to return some assets to the state, and take control of some Of the media companies. 🧵 7/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now some of you are thinking, well those are dictatorial actions. And “he should allow those oligarchs to exploit the people since you know that’s what democracy works.” But you still believe that democracy is “rule of the people.” It is not. Our modern day democracies are rule by media bosses with a mixture of lobbyist during the political process. (Rule of money rather) As such, the interest of a nation are ground down, and the nation is ran by “oligarchs” or in the case of the United States we call them Jewish billionaires. In 2007, Putin lays out his criticisms of NGO’s, the U.S. abuse of power and continued military intervention, the need to refrain from “nato expansion”, and called for a multipolar world. Effectively, after turning Russia around, he told the Jewish led west, he was not going to be pushed around. He also opposed their Talmudic new world order goal, and he has been correct about the detrimental effects of foreign intervention that the U.S. continues to engage in at the behest of the jews… From then on, our Jewish media bosses, state department, and war lords, had it out for Putin.. and they have been trying to overthrow him ever since. 🧵 8/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спикер подчёркивает, что безопасность охватывает военно-политические, экономические и гуманитарные аспекты, и баланс явно нарушен. Он говорит: "ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран", и что "вскрыли бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ" и "формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных" НПО. По его словам, "гуманитарная сфера ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека", но "это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться." Такое вмешательство, по его мнению, "не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными." Он призывает ОБСЕ действовать по задачам и строить отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения и доверия. Россия, с тысячелетней историей, сохраняет независимую внешнюю политику и хочет сотрудничать с ответственными партнерами ради справедливого мироустройства для всех. Speaker notes: English translation of the Russian summary: Speaker emphasizes that security encompasses military-political, economic, and humanitarian aspects, and the balance is clearly broken. He states: "OSCE is trying to turn into a vulgar instrument of pursuing external political interests of one or a group of countries against others," and notes that "the bureaucratic apparatus of the OSCE has been exposed" and that "formally independent, but purposefully financed, and thus controlled" NGOs exist. According to him, "the humanitarian sphere of the OSCE is to assist member states at their request in upholding international norms in the field of human rights," but "this does not mean interference in internal affairs of other countries, and certainly not forcing these states how they should live and develop." Such interference, in his view, "does not contribute to the maturation of genuine democratic states and, on the contrary, makes them dependent and, as a consequence, unstable." He calls on the OSCE to act according to its tasks and to build relations with sovereign states on the basis of respect and trust. Russia, with a thousand-year history, maintains an independent foreign policy and wants to cooperate with responsible partners for a just world order for all, not for the chosen ones.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я подчеркну это все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами и учредителями. Вскроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций. Формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем. Но вовсе это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем, мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. Конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2008, Jewish puppets John McCain (funded by the bronfman family) and Barrack Obama both have the same foreign policy and talking points when it comes to dealing with Putin. He’s a dictator, and the “west” needs to stand up to him… Meanwhile they slyly discuss how more Eastern European nations need to come under NATO (world Jewish control.) A no go for a nationalist like Putin. 🧵 9/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues Russia is a nation fueled by petrodollars and a KGB apparatchik run government, saying, "I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b." He calls Georgia's aggression unacceptable and links it to energy, noting "a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey" and that "the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe." He cites solidarity from Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine in Tbilisi, and warns Russia aims to revive the "old Russian empire." The United States will "support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine" into NATO, while Russia is "in violation of their ceasefire agreement" and has stationed troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. He recalls a Georgian poster "Vladimir Putin, our president" and says "watch Ukraine" as Crimea and Sevastopol are cited; "we are their friend and ally." Senator McCain and I agree.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Russia has now become a nation fueled by petrodollars that is basically a KGB apparatchik run government. I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b. And their aggression in Georgia is not acceptable behavior. I do believe that we need to bolster our friends and allies, and that wasn't just about a a problem between Georgia and Russia. It had everything to do with energy. There's a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey. And, of course, we know that the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe, which they have used from time to time. It's not accidental that the presence of Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine flew to Georgia, flew to Tbilisi, where I have spent significant amount of time with a great young president, Misha Sakashvili. And they showed solidarity with them, but also they are very concerned about the Russian threats to regain their status of the old Russian empire. Now I think the Russians ought to understand that we will support. We, The United States, will support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine and and the the natural process inclusion into NATO. We also want to make it very clear that the Russians are in violation of their ceasefire agreement. They have stationed additional troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. By the way, I went there once, and we went inside and drove in, and there was a huge poster. And this is this is Georgian territory, and there was a huge picture of Vladimir Putin, and it said, Vladimir Putin, our president. It was very clear, the Russian intentions towards Georgia. They were just waiting to seize the opportunity. So this is a very difficult situation. We wanna work with the Russians, but we also have every right to expect the Russians to behave in a fashion in keeping with a with a with a country who respects international boundaries and the norms of international behavior. And watch Ukraine. This whole thing is a got a lot to do with Ukraine, Crimea, the base of the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, and the breakdown of the political process in Ukraine between Temushchenko and Yushchenko is a very serious problem. So watch Ukraine, and let's make sure that we that the Ukrainians understand that we are their friend and ally. Senator, do you have a major difference with what he just said? No. Actually, think senator McCain and I agree for

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2012, when Hillary Clinton and our state department was lying to our faces about what Assad was doing and why, Putin and Russia were backing Assad. Saying that if Assad fell, Syria could fall into a perpetual civil war, and that they didn’t believe the reports of Assad using “chemical weapons.” Fast forward to now where Syria is a mess and the only country that benefited from Assads fall was Israel. Now it’s easy to see why the jews in our government wanted to get rid of Putin. 🧵 10/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. Norway and our other European allies have been strong, consistent voices on behalf of the Syrian people, and I commend them for their advocacy. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. There has been a crescendo of condemnation, not only from the world, but in particular from the region. After the Security Council statement, we've seen movement in rapid succession from the Arab League, the GCC, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and others. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. In particular, we urge those countries still buying Syrian oil and gas, those countries still sending Assad weapons, those countries whose political and economic support give him comfort in his brutality to get on the right side of history. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways. Now it is something that we are
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? In Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2014, the U.S. state department led by jews like Victoria Nuland, staged a coup against the duly elected president Victor Yanukovych. What was Yanukovychs crime? He was too pro Russian, and was not necessarily going to push the boundaries for NATO expansion. So you can see the international jews went to work, with George Soros funding dissidents, the Jewish American media machine saying Yanukovych was not elected properly, and Jewish state department rep Victoria Nuland even handing out cookies to Ukrainian dissidents. This led to Putin invading and annexing the Crimea. 🧵 11/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 1989 revolutions, you funded dissident activities and civil society groups in Eastern Europe, including Poland and the Czech Republic; are you doing similar work in Ukraine? He replies that he set up a foundation in Ukraine before its independence from Russia, and that the foundation has functioned ever since and played an important part in events now. He says Ukraine can assert independence from Russia and move toward the West, though Putin will try to destabilize it; the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent, and with freedom, free media, and a flourishing economy, his regime would be unsustainable. He is asked about antisemitism in Ukraine; he notes antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world, and there is antisemitism.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many people recognized about you was that you, during the revolutions of nineteen eighty nine, funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, The Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of, Russia, and the foundation has been, functioning ever since. And it played an important part in events now. Speaker 0: Do you think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of independence from Russia, and an alignment, with the West? Not not a specific alignment as a NATO, but a kind of orientation toward the West, or will the Russians always stop them? Speaker 1: No. Putin will try to destabilize, Ukraine, but the Ukrainians, the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent of of Russia. It won't be easy because Putin, has, staked his regime on destabilizing Ukraine because it's a threat to to his regime in Russia. If you have freedom, free media, and so on, and a flourishing economy, that would, make his regime, unsustainable. Speaker 0: He accuses the Ukrainians of being antisemitic, of them being full of antisemitic fascists. You operate in Ukraine. You're of Jewish origin. Have you detected virulent antisemitism in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world. So there is antisemit

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Remember the “Russian Collusion hoax” of 2017? Did you know that research was funded by a Jew named Paul Singer?? 🧐 Obviously Trump was acquitted, but the intended effect was missed by many. It was to be associated with Russia, is a crime. Remember that Trump ran on “warming relations” With the Russians. Well that was pretty much iced by this fake scandal, and so it worked. 🧵 12/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Then we have the 2nd impeachment hoax. Also involving Ukraine/Russia, but what was the crux of the matter? That Trump was going to withhold weapons from Ukraine…. A no no for our Jewish oligarchs. Thus this scandal provided the same effect yet again. Trump affirms his support of Ukraine, and distances himself from Russia, and everyone is afraid to tell the truth about Russia, or they will be labeled a “foreign agent” because Ukraine is our potential NATO ally. Well it’s not our ally. It’s manufactured state created by NATO and currently ran by a coke head Jew Zelensky …. Did you also know that the guy that “leaked” scandalous phone call for Trumps 2nd impeachment was also Jewish? What are the odds…. 🧵 13/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Never forget how Zelensky came to power in Ukraine and who funded his rise… Before he was killed in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira laid out exactly how Zelensky was manufactured and funded by Israeli Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky. And that same billionaire Kolomoisky, was the Jew who had a controlling interest in Burisma… the gas company that was paying Hunter Biden 50k a month. Oh a tangled web the Jews weave to blackmail/ buy influence… 🧵 14/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky is 'the cokehead of Kyiv' and 'a manufactured political figure' created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, owner of OnePlusOne Media, which financed and produced 'Servant of the People.' 'Servant of the People' hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, to play the role of the President. Kolomoyski created a party called 'Servant of the People' and financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire; 'he's the finger puppet of Kolomsky.' Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden to the tune of $50,000 a month on Burisma's Board of Directors in 2014. 'Hunter Biden' and Zelensky are 'spiritual cousins' bankrolled by the same guy. The laptop mentions a 10% kickback to 'the old man.' The White House is freaking out over Ukraine; Westerners exploited Ukraine; Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, And OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelenskyy, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show. It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly. Kolomoisky, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest. Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch. And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden. Yes, in 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma? Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins. They are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine. But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad who's President of The United States, now does he? Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, see, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets, monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine. This is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe, of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it. Hunter Biden? $50,000 a month. And you say to yourself, well, thousand isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States. In Ukraine, a much poorer country, $50,000 a year, easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year. And Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh yeah. Look it up. You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden. God alone knows who else he was financing, and he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine, and they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

After the Jews had their Zelensky puppet installed, and they their Jewish Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, they finally pushed Putin to the breaking point. He then invaded Ukraine in 2022. And the lying Jewish controlled mass media tells us, “Putin is crazy” and he is slaughtering Slavs. But he’s not. He’s been very strategic in trying to limit loss of life. And our lying media leaves out the fact that this was a totally Jewish provoked war, for NATO power expansion. They also always leave out the fact that the jews and the U.S. state department (one and the same) overthrew the Ukrainian regime in 2014…. 🧵 15/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

And if Putin is such an oppressive awful leader, like our Jewish media tells us, why then is Russia still allowed to be Russian? Putin has outlawed Gay Marriage, Transgender madness, and no one is going to jail for being proud to be a “White Russian.” In other words, Putin has shielded his people from the pernicious Jewish influence that is destroying the west right now. Under Putin, the Russian economy has done quite well from where it was in 1999. Also the debt situation and natural resource situation in Russia is great. Further the Russian Orthodox Church has done exceptionally well under Putins leadership. Meanwhile many brainwashed Christians in the west are serving Jews for the expansion of Israel while our nation fails. Putin even allowed for Edward Snowden to seek Asylum in Russia and has protected him against our blood thirsty government and its Jewish controllers… 🧵 16/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Is Putin an out an out antisemite? No. He is not. He even has Jewish friends and the like, but clearly he is a nationalist, and he is opposed to the Jewish new world order. While he may not name them explicitly, he names them implicitly…. Like in these 2 clips where he describes the “American media propaganda machine” the “bankers”, and who really blew up Nordstream… 🧵 17/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But but here's a question you may be able to answer. You worked in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? Speaker 1: This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

So the jews and the west will continue do what they can to “pray for Putins death” as Krassenstein says below. But America should see through the propaganda. We need a leader very much like Putin if we are to ever overcome our Jewish overlords. If not, we will continue to see non white immigration, transgender lunacy, and wars in the Middle East (and Ukraine) for Israel… If you enjoyed this thread, Consider subscribing to the page! 🧵 18/18

ivan_8848
Posted - November 1, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Saved - November 1, 2025 at 11:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue the Ukraine-Russia war was provoked by NATO expansion and US policies: Brzezinski’s plan to surround Russia, the ABM withdrawal, Kosovo bombings, and the 2014 coup undermining Yanukovych. NATO’s encirclement and Ukraine’s de facto membership pushed Russia to act. A neutral Ukraine could end it; negotiators in Istanbul showed a path Europe blocked. Jeffrey Sachs and Mearsheimer cite NATO enlargement as the core provocation.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

🚨THE UKRAINE -RUSSIAN WAR WAS PROVOKED NATO DID NOT PROMOTE PEACE, NATO PROMOTED WARS How did this start? Zbigniew Brzezinski in the United States said, "We can surround Russia. We can weaken Russia. We can make Russia fall into pieces." He literally wrote in 1997, he said, "Oh, there'll be a confederation of three weak states, a European Russia, Siberian Russia, Far East Russia." This, this was a senior advisor to the US. They decided 30 years ago, we're gonna surround Russia in the Black Sea, we're going to weaken Russia, we're going to put our military all around Russia. They broke the nuclear balance and nuclear arms control framework in 2002. This was the worst move of all. United States walked out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. And the Russians said, "Oh. You, you wanna have a first strike? You'll attack us in a decapitation strike and then you'll use your anti-ballistic missile system to prevent deterrents." In 2002, the United States just walked out of the ABM Treaty and the Russians said, "Excuse me? What, what, what the hell are you doing? This is our balance." And it came in the context of NATO enlargement. It came in the context of the United States bombing Belgrade for 78 straight days in 1999 to break Serbia in two, but in Kosovo, that region broken apart from Serbia, to put the largest NATO military base in Southeastern Europe, "Camp Bondsteel", in that base. So, the Russians are saying, "Are you kidding? You bomb Belgrade, you expand NATO even though you promised not to do so, you walk out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the list goes on and on. You attack Iraq on completely phony pretenses, you launch a CIA operation to overthrow Bashar al-Assad, you send NATO to overthrow Gaddafi, late in, 2011, and you say NATO's gonna expand to Ukraine and to Georgia. You blame Russia for this? This was an America drunk with its power, saying we can do anything we want and with a plan, and the plan third-rate or fourth-rate or fifth-rate country or to break it was to turn Russia into a apart. On February 21st, 2014, three foreign ministers of the European Union negotiated with Mr. Yanukovych that he would stay in power and that there would be elections eight months later, and this was also agreed with President Putin. The next morning, a US-backed coup violently overthrew Yanukovych, and it took the United States a nanosecond to say, "We support the new government." Europe, because it's so filled with principles, "No, no, no. Yanukovych is president." No, of course it didn't say that. It said, "Whatever daddy said."So, daddy said that it's, now a new government brought in by a coup, and Europe suddenly couldn't even remember 24 hours that it negotiated an agreement with Yanukovych that he would stay in power. And they said, "No, no. He resigned." Oh, we don't think Russia should stay in Crimea anymore." It's been Russia's naval fleet since 1783. The coup is not a coincidence. The coup is to get Russia out of Sevastopol. That's the point. It was the reason why there was a Crimean War in 1853 when Britain and France said, "Get Russia out of the Black Sea." It was Brzezinski's idea in 1997. When Trump comes in in the first term, US pours in the military aid and builds up a million-person army, the largest in Europe actually. What happened when Russia invaded in February 24th, 2022? Within about a week, Zelenskyy said, "Okay, we can be neutral, we can be neutral." And the Ukrainians sent a note to the Russians, "Neutral. We, we don't need the NATO invasion. You stop fighting, we'll declare neutrality." I know in detail this story because I talked to the negotiators at length, and to the Turkish mediators, because a process started in Istanbul to have Ukraine and Russia sit down with each other. And on April 15th, they initialed a document which was almost complete. What happened? The United States and Britain walked in and told the Ukrainians, "No, you continue fighting." The European mainstream media blocks the most basic facts on all of this. This, war could have ended so many times it avoided entirely. Now Europe is in this unbelievable warmongering period led by the German chancellor, of all people and all countries, absolutely unpleasant, Merz, Macron, Starmer. In 2023, I had a conversation with President Macron. And I said, "Mr. President, this war came from NATO enlargement." He said, "You're absolutely right." I said, "Mr. President, this war could end if NATO would just be clear that it's not going to enlarge Ukraine." "You're absolutely right." Yes, nice conversation. He said exactly the opposite in public, and until today says exactly the opposite. --------------------------------------------------- *In 2001, Putin Wanted Russia to Join NATO. Two Times That We Were Ready to Join NATO. Both times we were turned down. Ukraine is the only NON-NATO nation supporting every NATO mission. In Afghanistan and Iraq Ukrainian troops are helping to support democracies. Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶The biggest threat in the world is NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/JWdcFCvgV8

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Of course, the Mexicans are not so crazy to do it, but the Ukrainians are, I'm sorry to say. Jeffrey Sachs: My view is completely different, which is that if you're Ukraine, you be different, which is that if you're Ukraine, you be neutral, and it's your neutrality that protects you, protects Europe, and protects Russia. It's what's called indivisible security. A neutral Ukraine is the safest possible thing for Ukraine to start with but it also protects Europe. It also protects Russia.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/kkAngDI655

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Jeffrey Sachs: Until the coup, the public was against NATO. Yanukovych, who was the president overthrown in this US-backed coup, knew, "This is not smart for us. If we go down that road, we're gonna be a war zone." The Europeans are even more warmongers than the Americans right now.

kadmitriev
Posted - December 26, 2025 at 6:22 AM
Saved - December 29, 2025 at 8:36 PM

@kadmitriev - Kirill Dmitriev

Historical clip worth rewatching: President Putin on Russia potentially joining NATO, George W. Bush laughing, and why Moscow views NATO as an anti-Russia bloc—not a “defensive alliance.” This one explains a lot. 👇 https://t.co/x8rtfgfhOY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the idea of Russia joining NATO and relates it to recently declassified documents. He reads a 1954 note from the Soviet government to NATO member countries, stating: "Relying on the unchanging principles of our peaceful foreign policy and striving to reduce tension in international relations, the Soviet government expresses readiness to consider jointly with interested governments the question of the USSR's participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization." He then presents the response to that proposal: “There is no need to underline the utterly unrealistic nature of such a proposal.” The speaker recalls an earlier moment, about a year prior, when, in response to the question about Russia possibly joining NATO, he said, “why not?” He notes that former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, while traveling in Europe, responded that this is not being discussed now. The core discussion is framed around understanding whether NATO is a military organization and whether Russia would be welcome there. The speaker suggests that NATO is indeed a military organization and questions whether Russia would be wanted there. He asserts that NATO “is moving toward our borders,” and he ascribes to this movement a purpose or inevitability that shapes Russia’s position on the issue. In summarizing the underlying basis of the Russian position, the speaker emphasizes the perception that NATO’s character as a military alliance and its movements toward Russia’s borders inform a strategic stance against expanding membership to include Russia. He contrasts the historical openness expressed in 1954 with the contemporary response that such a proposal is not realistic, and with current statements from Western officials indicating that Russia’s accession is not under consideration. The narrative ties together declassified archival material, a past provocative-appearing suggestion, and present-day geopolitical calculations about NATO’s reach and military posture near Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Вы относитесь, возможно ли, чтобы Россия как-то присоединилась к НАТО? Я сказал, почему бы нет? Сейчас изложу. Я вам сейчас зачитаю недавно рассекреченные документы были секретными в свое время написано копия рассекречена было совершенно секретно значит это нота советского правительства 1954 года, направленная странам-участницам НАТО. Здесь написано следующее: Руководствуясь неизменными принципами своей миролюбивой внешней политики и стремясь к уменьшению напряженности в международных отношениях, Советское правительство выражает готовность рассмотреть совместно с заинтересованными правительствами вопрос об участии СССР в Северо-Атлантическом договоре. А вот ответ. Нет необходимости подчеркивать совершенно нереалистический характер такого предложения. Это ответ. Помните, где-то год назад, примерно, может быть, на вопрос о том, вот как вы относитесь, возможно ли, чтобы Россия как-то присоединилась к НАТО, я сказал: почему бы нет? И сразу же бывшая госсекретарь госпожа Олбрейт, не помню, где она была, где-то в командировке в Европе, сказала, но это не обсуждается сейчас. Вы понимаете, дело в том, что мы же задаемся вопросом, это военная организация или нет? Военная. Нас там видеть не хотят? Не хотят. Она двигается к нашим габаритницам? Двигается. Зачем? Вот что лежит в основе нашей позиции.
afshinrattansi
Posted - February 14, 2026 at 10:31 PM
Saved - February 15, 2026 at 7:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall Putin’s 2007 Munich warning that Russia would resist NATO expansion, exposing the hypocrisy of the post-Cold War “rules-based order.” He criticised a unipolar world and US wars, warned Europe’s missile defense could upset the nuclear balance and spark a new arms race, and noted those concerns were ignored, with Ukraine’s war and rising Russia–NATO tensions the result.

@afshinrattansi - Afshin Rattansi

If you’ve seen the circus at the Munich Security Conference this year, here’s a throwback to a speech with actual consequence: Vladimir Putin’s 2007 Munich Security Conference speech represented Russia🇷🇺 openly exposing the hypocrisy of the post-Cold War ‘rules-based order’ and Russia declaring that it would not tolerate NATO expansion onto its borders to encircle Moscow. As NATO expansion steamrolled ahead with Moscow’s concerns ignored for years, Putin warned Russia would resist the expansion. He criticised the emergence of a unipolar world, where the US abused its power with endless wars and military interventions. He warned that the US’ missile defence plans in Europe were a threat to the nuclear strategic balance, which could trigger a new arms race. Russia’s concerns were ignored or ridiculed for years, the Ukraine proxy war and the current dangerous tensions between Russia and NATO are the consequences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that international security is broader than military-political stability and includes global economic stability, poverty reduction, economic security, and civilizational dialogue. He emphasizes the principle that security of each is security of all, recalling Franklin Roosevelt’s idea that “wherever peace is violated, peace everywhere is threatened.” He asserts that two decades ago the world was split ideologically and economically, with security provided by the large strategic potential of two superpowers, and that global confrontation has moved to the periphery of international relations, leaving acute economic and social issues unresolved. He criticizes the unipolar world as not achievable or acceptable, defining it as one center of power and one center of decision-making, a model he says is not democracy and ultimately destructive for both the ruled and the ruler. He notes that unilateral, illegitimate actions have not solved problems and have caused new tragedies and tens of thousands of civilian deaths. He points to the increasing and unchecked use of force in international affairs, the neglect of core principles of international law, and the tendency to resolve issues on the basis of political expediency. The speaker highlights new threats such as weapons of mass destruction and terrorism, arguing for a balanced approach that considers the interests of all international actors. He notes the rapid changes in the international landscape, including the rise of China and India, whose combined GDP (at PPP) surpasses the US, and BRICS collectively surpassing the EU, predicting that economic power will increasingly translate into political influence and strengthen multipolarity. He calls for multilateral diplomacy, openness, transparency, and predictability, with force used only as an exceptional measure and in accordance with the UN Charter, not as a substitute for collective security institutions such as the UN, NATO, or the EU. The speaker defends adherence to international treaties on nonproliferation and disarmament, recalling Russia’s agreement with the US to cut strategic nuclear weapons to 1700–2200 deployable warheads by December 31, 2012, and emphasizes Russia’s commitment to the NPT and multilateral controls on missile technologies. He critiques the proliferation of missile systems in various countries and the existence of new high-tech weapons, including space-based systems, warning that militarization of space could have consequences comparable to the nuclear era. He announces a Russian proposal for a Space Weapons Prevention Treaty and discusses concerns about missile defense deployments in Europe, arguing they provoke a new arms race and distrust. Regarding conventional forces in Europe, he criticizes the Adapted CFE Treaty for insufficient ratification and notes NATO’s expansion near Russian borders, arguing that such expansion reduces mutual trust. He recalls a 1990 NATO secretary-general statement about not placing troops beyond Germany’s borders and stresses that Russia seeks an independent foreign policy with responsible partners to build a fair and democratic world order for all. He also discusses energy cooperation, arguing that energy prices should be market-driven and that foreign capital participates significantly in Russian oil production, with investments in Russia exceeding Russian investments abroad by about 15:1. He mentions Russia’s ongoing WTO accession and criticizes double standards in poverty alleviation, noting how aid and subsidies can perpetuate economic underdevelopment and fuel radicalism and conflict. Finally, he defends the OSCE as a body intended to address security in a holistic way but contends it has been used to serve external interests and to finance NGOs that may interfere in internal affairs. He calls for the OSCE to respect sovereignty and for cooperation based on mutual trust. He closes by reaffirming Russia’s longstanding tradition of independent external policy and expresses a desire to work with responsible, independent partners to build a just, democratic world order that ensures security and prosperity for all.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Спасибо большое, уважаемая госпожа Федеральный канцлер, господин Тельчик, дамы и господа! Весьма признателен за приглашение на столь представительную конференцию, собравшую политиков, военных, предпринимателей, экспертов из более чем 40 стран мира. Формат конференции даёт мне возможность избежать излишнего политеса и необходимости говорить округлыми, приятными, но пустыми дипломатическими штампами. Формат Конференции позволяет сказать то, что я действительно думаю о проблемах международной безопасности. И если мои рассуждения покажутся нашим коллегам излишне полемически заострёнными либо неточными, я прошу на меня не сердиться, это ведь только Конференция. И надеюсь, что после двух-трех минут моего выступления господин Тельчик не включит там красный свет. Итак, известно, что проблематика международной безопасности много шире вопросов военно-политической стабильности. Это устойчивость мировой экономики, преодоление бедности, экономическая безопасность и развитие межцивилизационного диалога. Такой всеобъемлющий неделимый характер безопасности выражен и в её базовом принципе. Безопасность каждого это безопасность всех. Как сказал ещё в первые дни разгоравшейся Второй мировой войны Франклин Рузвельт, где бы ни был нарушен мир, мир повсюду оказывается в безопасности и под угрозой. Эти слова продолжают сохранять актуальность и сегодня. Об этом свидетельствует и тема нашей конференции, которая здесь написана Глобальные кризисы, глобальная ответственность. Всего лишь два десятилетия назад мир был идеологически и экономически расколот, а его безопасность обеспечивали огромные стратегические потенциалы двух сверхдержав. Глобальное противостояние отодвигало на периферию международных отношений и повестки дня крайне острые экономические и социальные вопросы. И как всякая война, война холодная, оставила нам и не разорвавшиеся снаряды, образно выражаясь. Имею в виду идеологические стереотипы, двойные стандарты, иные шаблоны блокового мышления. Предлагаевшийся же после холодной войны однополярный мир тоже не состоялся. История человечества, конечно, знает и периоды однополярного состояния, и стремления к мировому господству. Чего только не было в истории человечества. Однако что же такое однополярный мир? Как бы ни украшали этот термин, он в конечном итоге означает на практике только одно это один центр власти, один центр силы, один центр принятия решения. Это мир одного хозяина, одного суверена, и это в конечном итоге губительно не только для всех, кто находится в рамках этой системы, но и для самого суверена, потому что разрушает его изнутри. И это ничего общего не имеет, конечно, с демократией. Потому что демократия это, как известно, власть большинства при учёте интересов и мнения меньшинства. Кстати говоря, Россию нас постоянно учат демократии, но те, кто нас учат, сами почему-то учиться не очень хотят. Считаю, что для современного мира однополярная модель не только неприемлема, но и вообще невозможна. И не только потому, что при единоличном лидерстве в современном, именно в современном мире не будет хватать ни военно-политических, ни экономических Но, что ещё важнее, сама модель является неработающей, так как в её основе нет и не может быть морально-нравственной базы современной цивилизации. Вместе с тем всё, что происходит сегодня в мире и сейчас мы только начали дискутировать об этом, это следствие попыток внедрения именно этой концепции мировые дела, концепции однополярного мира. А какой результат? Односторонние, нелегитимные часто действия не решили ни одной проблемы. Более того, они стали генератором новых человеческих трагедий и очагов напряжённости. Судите сами: войн, локальных и региональных конфликтов меньше не стало. Господин Тельчик об этом очень мягко упомянул. И людей в этих конфликтах гибнет не меньше, а даже больше, чем раньше. Значительно больше. Сегодня мы наблюдаем почти ничем не сдерживаемое гипертрофированное применение силы в международных делах, военной силы, ввергающей мир в пучину следующих один за другим конфликтов. В результате не хватает сил на комплексное решение ни одного из них. Становится невозможным и их политическое решение. Мы видим все большее пренебрежение основополагающими принципами международного права. Больше того, отдельные нормы, да по сути чуть ли не вся система права одного государства, прежде всего конечно Соединённых Штатов, перешагнула свои национальные границы и по сути во всех сферах и в экономике, и в политике, и в гуманитарной сфере навязывается другим государствам. Но кому это понравится? В международных делах всё чаще встречается стремление решить тот или иной вопрос, исходя из так называемой политической целесообразности, основанной на текущей конъюнктуре. И это, конечно, крайне опасно и ведёт к тому, что никто уже не чувствует себя в безопасности. Я хочу это подчеркнуть никто не чувствует себя в безопасности, потому что никто не может спрятаться за международным правом как за каменной стеной. Такая политика является, конечно, катализатором гонки вооружений. Доминирование фактора силы неизбежно подпитывает тягу ряда стран к обладанию оружием массового уничтожения. Больше того, появились принципиально новые угрозы, которые и раньше были известны, но сегодня приобретают глобальный характер, такие как терроризм. Убежден, мы подошли к тому рубежному моменту, когда должны серьезно задуматься над всей архитектурой глобальной безопасности. И здесь надо отталкиваться от поиска разумного баланса между интересами всех субъектов международного общения. Тем более сейчас, когда международный ландшафт столь ощутимо и столь быстро меняется, меняется за счёт динамичного развития целого ряда государств и регионов. Госпожа Федеральный Канцлер упомянул уже об этом. Так, суммарный ВВП Индии и Китая по паритетной покупательной способности уже больше, чем у Соединённых Штатов Америки. А рассчитанные по тому же принципу ВВП государств группы Бразилия, Россия, Индия, Китай превосходят совокупный ВВП Евросоюза. И по оценкам экспертов, в обозримой исторической перспективе этот разрыв будет только возрастать. Не стоит сомневаться, что экономический потенциал новых центров мирового роста будет неизбежно конвертироваться в политическое влияние и укреплять будет многополярность. В этой связи серьезно возрастает роль многосторонней дипломатии. Открытость, транспарентность и предсказуемость политики безальтернативны, а применение силы должно быть действительно исключительной мерой, так же как и применение смертной казни в правовых системах некоторых государств. Сегодня же мы, наоборот, наблюдаем ситуацию, когда страны, в которых применение смертной казни запрещено даже в отношении убийц и других преступников, опасных преступников. Несмотря на это, такие стороны легко идут на участие в военных операциях, которые трудно назвать легитимными. А ведь в этих конфликтах гибнут люди, сотни, тысячи мирных людей. Но в то же время возникает вопрос: разве мы должны безучастно и безвольно взирать на различные внутренние конфликты в отдельных странах, на действия авторитарных режимов, тиранов, на распространение оружия массового уничтожения? Именно по сути это и лежало в основе вопроса, который был задан федеральному канцлеру нашим уважаемым коллегой господином Либерманном. Можем ли мы безучастно смотреть на то, что происходит? Я попробую ответить на ваш вопрос тоже. Конечно, мы не должны смотреть безучастно, конечно, нет. Но есть ли у нас средства противостоять этим угрозам? Конечно, есть. Достаточно вспомнить недавнюю историю. Ведь произошел же мирный переход к демократии в нашей стране. Ведь состоялась же мирная трансформация советского режима, мирная трансформация. И какого режима? С каким количеством оружия, в том числе ядерного оружия? Почему же сейчас при каждом удобном случае нужно бомбить и стрелять? Неужели в условиях отсутствия угрозы взаимного уничтожения нам не хватает политической культуры, уважения к ценностям демократии и к праву? Убеждён, единственным механизмом принятия решения по использованию военной силы как последнего довода может быть только устав ООН. И в этой связи я или не понял то, что было сказано совсем недавно нашим коллегой, министром обороны Италии, либо он выразился неточно, я, во всяком случае, услышал, что легитимным применение силы может считаться только в том случае, если решение принято в НАТО, или в Евросоюзе, или в ООН. Если он действительно так считает, то у нас с ним разные точки зрения. Или я ослышался. Легитимным можно считать применение силы, только если решение принято на основе и в рамках ООН. И не надо подменять Организацию Объединённых Наций ни НАТО, ни Евросоюза. И когда ООН будет реально объединять силы международного сообщества, которое действительно может реагировать на события в отдельных странах. Когда мы избавимся от пренебрежения международным правом, то ситуация может измениться. В противном случае ситуация будет заходить лишь в тупик и умножать количество тяжелых ошибок. При этом, конечно, нужно добиваться того, чтобы международное право имело универсальный характер и в понимании, и в применении норм. И нельзя забывать, что демографический образ действий в политике обязательно предполагает дискуссию и кропотливую выработку решений. Уважаемые дамы и господа, потенциальная опасность дестабилизации международных отношений связана и с очевидным застоем в области разоружения. Россия выступает за возобновление диалога по этому важнейшему вопросу. Важно сохранить устойчивость международно-правовой разоруженческой базы, при этом обеспечить преемственность процесса сокращения ядерных вооружений. Мы договорились с Соединёнными Штатами Америки о сокращении наших ядерных потенциалов на стратегических носителях до 1700-2200 ядерных боезарядов к 31 декабря 2012 года. Россия намерена строго выполнять взятые на себя обязательства. Надеемся, что и наши партнеры будут действовать также транспарентно и не будут откладывать на чёрный день лишнюю пару сотен ядерных боезарядов. И если сегодня Новый Министр обороны США здесь нам объявят, что США не будут прятать эти заряды лишние ни на складах, ни под подушкой, ни под одеялом. Я предлагаю всем встать и стоя это поприветствовать. Это было бы очень важным заявлением. Россия строго придерживается и намерена в дальнейшем придерживаться Договора о нераспространении ядерного оружия и многостороннего режима контроля за ракетными технологиями. Принципы, заложенные в этих документах, носят универсальный характер. В этой связи хотел бы вспомнить, что в восьмидесятых годах СССР и Соединённые Штаты подписали договор о ликвидации целого класса ракет средней и малой, но универсального характера этому документу предано не было. Сегодня такие ракеты уже имеет целый ряд стран: Корейская Народно-Демократическая Республика, Республика Корея, Индия, Иран, Пакистан, Израиль. Многие другие государства мира разрабатывают эти системы и планируют поставить их на вооружение. И только Соединённые Штаты Америки и Россия несут обязательства не создавать подобных систем вооружений. Ясно, что в этих условиях мы вынуждены задуматься об обеспечении своей собственной безопасности. Вместе с тем нельзя допустить появления новых дестабилизирующих высокотехнологичных видов оружия. Я уже не говорю о мерах по предупреждению новых сфер конфронтации, особенно в космосе. Звёздные войны, как известно, уже не фантастика, а реальность. Ещё в середине 80-х годов наши американские партнёры на практике провели перехват собственного спутника. Милитаризация космоса, по мнению России, может спровоцировать непредсказуемые для мирового сообщества последствия, не меньшие, чем начало ядерной эры. И мы не раз выступали с инициативами, направленными на недопущение оружия в космос. Сегодня хотел бы проинформировать Вас о том, что нами подготовлен проект Договора о предотвращении размещения оружия в космическом пространстве. В ближайшее время он будет направлен партнерам в качестве официального предложения. Давайте работать над этим вместе. Нас также не могут не тревожить планы по развертыванию элементов системы противоракетной обороны в Европе. Кому нужен очередной виток неизбежной в этом случае гонки вооружений? Глубоко сомневаюсь, что самим европейцем. Ракетного оружия, реально угрожающего Европе, с дальностью действия порядка пяти-восьми тысяч километров нет ни у одной так называемой проблемных стран. И будущем в обозримой перспективе и не появится, и не предвидится даже. Гипотетический пуск, например, северокорейской ракеты по территории США через Западную Европу это явно противоречит законам баллистики. Как говорят у нас в России, это всё равно что правой рукой дотягиваться до левого уха. Находясь здесь, в Германии, не могу не упомянуть и о кризисном состоянии Договора об обычных вооружённых силах в Европе. Адаптированный Договор об обычных вооружённых силах в Европе был подписан в 1999 году. Он учитывал новую геополитическую реальность ликвидацию Варшавского блока. С тех пор прошло семь лет, и только четыре государства ратифицировали этот документ, включая Российскую Федерацию. Страны НАТО открыто заявили, что не ратифицируют договор, включая положение о фланговых ограничениях, о размещении на флангах определенного количества вооруженных сил, до тех пор, пока Россия не выведет свои базы из Грузии и Молдавии. Из Грузии наши войска выводятся, причём даже в ускоренном порядке. Эти проблемы мы с нашими грузинскими коллегами решили, и это всем известно. В Молдавии остаётся группировка в полторы тысячи военнослужащих, которые выполняют миротворческие функции и охраняют склады с боеприпасами, оставшиеся со времён СССР. И мы с господином Саланой обсуждаем постоянно этот вопрос, он знает нашу позицию, мы готовы и дальше работать по этому направлению. Но что же происходит в это же самое время? А в это самое время в Болгарии и Румынии появляются так называемые легкие американские передовые базы по пять тысяч штыков в каждой. Получается, что НАТО выдвигает свои передовые силы к нашим государственным границам, а мы, строго выполняя договор, никак не реагируем на это действие. Думаю, очевидно, процесс натовского расширения не имеет никакого отношения к модернизации самого альянса или к обеспечению безопасности в Европе. Наоборот, это серьёзно провоцирующий фактор, снижающий уровень взаимного доверия. И у нас есть справедливое право откровенно спросить, против кого это расширение, и что стало с теми заверениями, которые давались западными партнёрами после роспуска Варшавского договора. Где теперь эти заявления? О них даже никто не помнит, но я позволю себе напомнить в этой аудитории. Хотел бы привести цитату из выступления Генерального секретаря НАТО господина Вернера в Брюсселе 17 мая 90 года. Он тогда сказал: Сам факт, что мы готовы не размещать войска НАТО за пределами территории ФРГ, дает Советскому Союзу твердые гарантии. И бетонные блоки Берлинской стены давно разошлись на сувениры. Но нельзя забывать, что её падение стало возможным в том числе и благодаря историческому выбору в том числе нашего народа, народа России, выбору в пользу демократии и свободы, открытости и искреннего партнёрства со всеми членами большой европейской семьи. Сейчас же нам пытаются навязать уже новые разделительные линии стены, пусть виртуальные, но все-таки разделяющие, разрезающие наш общий континент. Неужели вновь потребуются долгие годы и десятилетия, смена нескольких поколений политиков, чтобы разобрать и демонтировать эти новые стены? Уважаемые дамы и господа, мы однозначно выступаем и за укрепление режима нераспространения. Существующая международно-правовая база позволяет создать технологии по выработке ядерного топлива для использования его в мирных целях. И многие страны с полным на то основанием хотят создавать собственную ядерную энергетику как основу их энергетической независимости. Но мы также понимаем, что эти технологии могут быть быстро трансформированы в получение оружейных материалов. Это вызывает серьёзное международное напряжение. Яркий тому пример ситуация с иранской ядерной программой. Если международное сообщество не выработает разумного решения этого конфликта интересов, мир и дальше будет потрясать подобные дестабилизирующие кризисы, потому что пороговых стран больше, чем Иран, и мы с вами об этом знаем. Мы будем постоянно сталкиваться с угрозой распространения оружия массового уничтожения. В прошлом году Россия выступила с инициативой создания многонациональных центров по обогащению урана. Мы открыты к тому, чтобы подобные центры создавались не только в России, но и в других странах, где на легитимной основе существует мирная ядерная энергетика. Государства, желающие развивать атомную энергетику, могли бы гарантированно получать топливо через непосредственное участие в работе этих центров, конечно же, под строгим контролем МГАТЭ. С российским предложением созвучны и последние инициативы президента Соединённых Штатов Америки Джорджа Буша. Считаю, что Россия и США объективно и в одинаковой степени заинтересованы в ужесточении режимов нераспространения оружия массового уничтожения и средств его доставки. Именно наши страны, являющиеся лидерами по ядерному и ракетному потенциалу, должны стать и лидерами в разработке новых, более жёстких мер в сфере нераспространения. Россия готова к такой работе, мы ведём консультации с нашими американскими друзьями. В целом речь должна идти о создании целой системы политических рычагов и экономических стимулов. Стимулов, при которых государства были бы заинтересованы не создавать собственные мощности ядерного топливного цикла, но имели бы возможность развивать атомную энергетику, укрепляя свой энергетический потенциал. В этой связи подробнее остановлюсь на международном энергетическом сотрудничестве. Г-жа Федеральный Канцлер тоже об этом коротко, но упомянула, затронула эту тему. В энергетической сфере Россия ориентируется на создание единых для всех рыночных принципов и прозрачных условий. Очевидно, что цена на энергоносители должна определяться рынком, а не являться предметом политических спекуляций, экономического давления или шантажа. Мы открыты для сотрудничества. Зарубежная компания участвует в наших крупнейших энергетических проектах. По различным оценкам, до 26 процентов добычи нефти в России вдумайтесь в эту цифру, до двадцати шести процентов добычи нефти в России приходится на иностранный капитал. Попробуйте привести мне пример подобного широкого присутствия российского бизнеса в ключевых отраслях экономики западных государств. Нет таких примеров, таких примеров нет. Напомню также о соотношении инвестиций, поступающих в Россию и идущих из России в другие страны мира. Соотношение примерно 15:1 вот вам зримый пример открытости и стабильности российской экономики. Экономическая безопасность это сфера, где всем следует придерживаться единых принципов. Мы готовы честно конкурировать. Для этого у российской экономики появляется всё больше возможностей. Такую динамику объективно оценивают эксперты и наши зарубежные партнёры. Так, недавно был повышен рейтинг России в УС, и с четвёртой группы риска наша страна перешла в третью. И хотел бы, пользуясь случаем, здесь, сегодня, в Мюнхене, поблагодарить наших немецких коллег за содействие в принятии вышеназванного решения. Далее, как вы знаете, процесс присоединения России к ВТО вышел на финальную стадию. Отмечу, что в ходе долгих, непростых переговоров слова о свободе, мы не раз слышали слова о свободе слова, о свободе от торговли, о равных возможностях, но почему-то исключительно применительно к нашему, к российскому рынку. Еще одна важная тема, прямо влияющая на глобальную безопасность. Сегодня много говорят о борьбе с бедностью. Что здесь происходит на самом деле? С одной стороны, на программы помощи беднейшим странам выделяются финансовые ресурсы и подчас не маленькие финансовые ресурсы, но по-честному, и здесь многие тоже это знают, зачастую под освоение компаниями самих же стран-доноров. Но в то же время, с другой стороны, в развитых странах сохраняются субсидии в сельском хозяйстве, ограничивается для других доступ к высоким технологиям. И давайте называть вещи своими именами. Получается, что одной рукой раздается благотворительная помощь, а другой не только консервируется экономическая отсталость, а еще и собирается прибыль. Возникающее социальное напряжение в таких депрессивных регионах неизбежно выливаются в рост радикализма, экстремизма, подпитывает терроризм и локальные конфликты. А если всё это вдобавок происходит, скажем, на Ближнем Востоке, в условиях обостренного восприятия внешнего мира как несправедливого, то возникает риск для глобальной дестабилизации. Очевидно, что ведущие страны мира должны видеть эту угрозу и, соответственно, выстраивать более демократическую, справедливую систему экономических отношений в мире, систему, дающую всем шанс и возможность для развития. Выступая на конференции, уважаемые дамы и господа, нельзя обойти молчанием и деятельность организации по безопасности и сотрудничеству в Европе. Как известно, она была создана, чтобы рассматривать все, я подчеркну это, все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскроили и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами и учредителями. Вскроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций. Формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСФ призвана оказывать сторонам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы её поддерживаем. Но вовсе это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинно демократических государств и, наоборот, делает их зависимыми и, как следствие, нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку. Вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. И, конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнёрами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех. Благодарю вас за внимание.
View Full Interactive Feed