reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 6, 2023 at 8:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A whistleblower contacted @Yvonbrinkerink, revealing that 100,000 pallets of medical supplies, including ventilators and protective gear, are being destroyed in Amsterdam. The destruction started in May 2022 and must be completed by September 2023. The contractor is Milieuwerk, with @MinVWS as the client. Questions have been raised, and others like @dancalegria and @veen_els also have inquiries. The scale is massive, with 3,100 trucks needed for transport. The situation raises concerns about wasted taxpayer money and potential shortages in healthcare.

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

Het begon met een #mail. Via een tussenpersoon zocht een #klokkenluider contact met me. Zijn naam en contactgegevens zijn bij mij bekend en ik heb hem ook gesproken. Hij meldde het volgende: In oa #Eindhoven, #Rotterdam en #Oosterhout zijn 100.000 pallets met #medische

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

goederen verzameld. Deze worden vernietigd. Het betreft: #beademingsapparatuur, #maskers, #infusen, #hartlongmachines, beschermende #kleding en nog veel meer. Vernietiging vind plaats in #Amsterdam. Voor het vervoer van de #pallets zijn 3100 #vrachtwagens nodig. Het vernietigen

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

is gestart eind Mei 2022 en in het contract staat dat het eind september 2023 allemaal vernietigd moet zijn. Het vernietigen is uitbesteed aan #Milieuwerk aan de Kopraweg in Amsterdam. Op de #vrachtbrieven staat als #opdrachtgever @MinVWS. Dus

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

@MarionKoopmans @ministerVWS @hugodejonge @egerrit @MinPres @VWSTweedeKamer Er zijn wat #vragen gerezen. En ik denk dat ik niet de enige ben met vragen. Wellicht hebben @dancalegria @veen_els @john_bumblebee en enkele anderen ook nog vragen hierover. In 1 pallet zitten

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

950.000 #mondmaskers. We hebben het hier over een contract van in totaal 100.000 pallets. Gemiddeld 9 volle vrachtwagens per dag. #klokkenluider #jeugdzorg

@janvanruth - jvr

@Yvonbrinkerink ik geloof er geen barst van. dus laat maar eens wat zien.

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

@janvanruth Moet je lekker zelf weten.

@tommychong - Tommy Chong

There's one thing we forgot to mention...

@LeePeleeg - McIntosh⚓️ …De toon maakt de muziek….

@Yvonbrinkerink Yvon, 100.000 pallets vergt veel ruimte, enig idee wie dit logistiek kan handelen ?

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

@LeePeleeg Het is op verschillende plekken opgeslagen. Staat in de tweet

@wim_tweet - Wim

@Yvonbrinkerink Als dit zo is, kunt u dan wat (geanonimiseerd) bewijs daarvan tonen?

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

@wim_tweet Want u denkt dat ik de vernietiger van al die spullen, de vervoerder en de klokkenluider uit mijn duim zuig? Alles op zijn tijd!

@pieter_vkampen - Pieter van Kampen 🇺🇦

@Yvonbrinkerink 100 miljard maskers? Of had je dat absurde aantal nog niet zelf uitgerekend?

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

@pieter_vkampen Kun jij lezen? Het gaat niet alleen om maskers!

@avaturner45 - Just Lisa

@Yvonbrinkerink Jij bent een oplichter!

@Yvonbrinkerink - Yvonne Brinkerink (Klokkenluider Jeugdzorg)

@avaturner45 En jij gerapporteerd!

@LogiForce - C.P.E. van Beilen

@Yvonbrinkerink Klinkt als het vernietigen van potentieel bewijsmateriaal.

@misspixelbcn - Esther

@Yvonbrinkerink @threadreaderapp unroll

@threadreaderapp - Thread Reader App

@misspixelbcn @Yvonbrinkerink @misspixelbcn Hola, please find the unroll here: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1687559962724122624.html Talk to you soon. 🤖

Thread by @Yvonbrinkerink on Thread Reader App @Yvonbrinkerink: Het begon met een #mail. Via een tussenpersoon zocht een #klokkenluider contact met me. Zijn naam en contactgegevens zijn bij mij bekend en ik heb hem ook gesproken. Hij meldde het volgende: In oa #...… threadreaderapp.com

@Butterf70713546 - RIA 🇳🇱📵 🏛️ NO ✉️ DM 🚮 ❤️🚜

@Yvonbrinkerink Dit is erg ! Heel erg ! Want het gaat hier om geld dat door de burgers betaald is.

@JeannetVerhoev1 - Jeannet Verhoeven

@Yvonbrinkerink @PieterOmtzigt @lientje1967 @MarijnissenL kom er maar in....... Het volgende schandaal is about to start

@loontje1003 - Ilona

@Yvonbrinkerink Misschien ook interessant voor @VegtDoor @waukema @CeesCees72 @Denachtzuster1

@LeoAQuik - Leo Q.

@Yvonbrinkerink @john_bumblebee Aai dit is wel heel pijnlijk aan het worden

@oudkatje - Katje 🐈🐦 TheOldCat 🐯

@Yvonbrinkerink @john_bumblebee Waarom de vernietiging ?... Zeker de bruikbare medische apparatuur? Stinkend zaakje!..🤷‍♀️🤔

@LouisevanBlitt2 - Louise van Blitterswijk

@Yvonbrinkerink Wel het uitzoeken waard, lijkt mij.

@SuckPoppit - SuckPoppit

@Yvonbrinkerink @john_bumblebee pfas?

@Harrishawk - Blijf wakker!

@Yvonbrinkerink Is dit misschien het zogenaamde "afval uit Italië"?? Zodat de vrachtwagens, welke gebruikt worden, en de treinwagons, verantwoord kunnen worden???

@Nanda_goodwitch - Nanda the good, old, dutch witch

@Yvonbrinkerink @Bullshit_vs_Lie Zijn ze tekorten in ziekenhuizen aan het creëren? Dit is in lijn met dat in Nederland steeds minder zorg beschikbaar is. Minder ziekenhuizen, bedden, verpleegkundigen, apparatuur en materiaal. Dan kun je alweer snel blèren dat de zorg het niet aan kan.

@EpochTimes - The Epoch Times

What they don’t want you to know? 🔥Watch Now👉https://watchepoch.com/gUS0Qx

Leaving California: The Untold Story | A Must-See Documentary "Leaving California: The Untold Story” is a feature-length documentary that portrays the growing challenges of living in California, ... theepochtimes.com

@klimaaterkenner - ☮️ 𝙆𝙡𝙞𝙢𝙖𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙠𝙚𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙧🕊️

@Yvonbrinkerink Wow

@ToonHabraken - Toon Habraken | Music Composer

@Yvonbrinkerink Niet liegen!

@BobRooij - Bob de Rooij - Waarheidszoeker des Vaderlands 🧐

@Yvonbrinkerink Ik kan 2 redenen verzinnen: 1) Het spul is over de datum, besmet, kapot, o.i.d., of 2) Dit najaar komt de volgende pandemie en ze willen dat er wéér een zorgcrisis ontstaat, zodat ze het maatregelenpakket in werking kunnen stellen...

@miepjev - MiepjevVerkade

@Yvonbrinkerink @MeeuwissenNL

@IngridTuinstra1 - Ingrid Tuinstra 🌸 #IkWeiger

@Yvonbrinkerink Ze zijn alles aan het uitwissen @2eKamertweets hoe zit dit

@E__________V - EV

@Yvonbrinkerink ?🤔 @blckbxnews @ongehoordnedtv @rblommestijn @EvaVlaar @PvanHouwelingen @WybrenvanHaga @DissidentNl @superjan @Symph0ny3 @deSunShineBand @DDStandaard @FrankPeeters4 @IkNet @beek38 @DevliegerErik

@FrankGrimm17 - FrankGrimm 🇳🇱Global Leader

@Yvonbrinkerink In het begin van de corona waanzin was tekort aan beademingsapparatuur want mensen lagen massaal op hun buik op bed. Tekort aan mondkapjes enzovoort enzovoort. Later bleek al die troep niet nodig en hoorde je er niets meer van. Ook de beademingsapparatuur. Niets. Dat is deze zooi

@ToineRoosendaal - ToineRoosendaal

@Yvonbrinkerink Never happened

@MargrietM1502 - 😎PietjePietje😎

@Yvonbrinkerink Als dit waar is @FleurAgemaPVV mag ik hopen dat er hier een paar tot verantwoording worden geroepen.

@kuiken123 - kitty hogeling

@Yvonbrinkerink Goed dat je dit naar buiten brengt.

@adinde_x - Luchtballon X

@Yvonbrinkerink Daar gaat ons belastinggeld 🤮❣️

@DooremaRuud - Ruud 🇳🇱🇪🇺 #heksenfan Doorema

@Yvonbrinkerink Leugenaar! 😀

@opnieuwbekijken - Opnieuw-bekijken

@Yvonbrinkerink De klokkenluider die als bok op de haverkist zit maar nooit weet waar de klepel hangt ...

@hanksetank - frank se tank 🇳🇱❤️🇺🇦

@Yvonbrinkerink Ben jij dat gestoorde mens waarvan ze terecht de kinderen hebben afgenomen of is dat een andere wappie?

Saved - August 28, 2023 at 7:54 PM

@contraopa - Pro / Contra / Opa Ⓜ️ AfD 🇩🇪 Gefallener Engel 👼

Hier mal etwas #Bildung für @ToniHofreiter . Die wahren #Landesverräter kommen aus seiner Ecke! Wir brauchen mehr und eine noch stärkere @AfD damit diese #Verräter …

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses shame in being German and accuses others of betraying the country. Speaker 1 argues that there is no such thing as a nation or knowledge, and therefore no betrayal of the nation. Speaker 2 asks Speaker 1 about their knowledge on a specific topic. Speaker 1 reiterates their support for mandatory vaccination. Speaker 2 reminds Speaker 1 of their promise of no mandatory vaccination. Speaker 1 defends their stance, stating that it is about public health and being truthful. Speaker 2 argues that being liberal often leads to political downfall. Speaker 1 clarifies that they support mandatory vaccination but believe it should be proportionate. Speaker 2 calls for mandatory vaccination in Germany. Speaker 1 assures that there will be no forced vaccination or violation of rights. They believe a solution will be found through a process that may lead to mandatory vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ich schäme mich sozusagen, ein Deutscher zu sein. Hast Du unterachte das Land? Volksverräter. Ist 'n Nachsi Begriff. Speaker 1: Es gibt kein Volk und es gibt kein Wissen, auch kein Verrat am Volk. Speaker 2: Was wissen Sie über das Speaker 1: Ich habe die ganze Zeit gesagt, dass ich für alle Impfpflicht bin und ich bleibe dabei. Speaker 2: Nein, haben wir versprochen, dass es Eine Impfpflicht. Gibt dran muss man sich als Staat dann auch halten. Speaker 1: Es geht Gesundheitsfragen. Was ist falsch daran, die Wahrheit zu sein? Speaker 2: Die Wahrheit, also Also liberal führt in sehr vielen Fällen zum politischen Tod. Ich bitte Sie. Ich würd dann versuchen, die Ungeimpften zur Impfung zu zwingen, Indem ich sage, also wir können sonst dann nicht aus. Jeder weiß, dass ich Speaker 1: ein Befürworter der Impfpflicht bin. Eine Impfpflicht wäre nicht verhältnismäßig. Für eine solche Impfpflicht, ein scharfes Schwert. Ich glaub, es ist verhältnismäßig. Aber Herr Lindner. Keine Impfpflicht, auch keine Impfpflicht. Speaker 2: Lassen Sie uns in Deutschland endlich eine Impfpflicht einführen. Speaker 1: Deutschland keinen Zwang zum Impfen geben wird. Auch jemand, der diesen Impfstoff nicht verwenden, Dem werden nicht die Grundrechte genommen. Das ist eine absurde und bösartige Behauptung. Ich glaube, die Zeit ist reif und mit dem Verfahren wird man eine Lösung finden, Die am Ende zu einer Impfpflicht Speaker 2: führt.
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 4:04 PM

@Kachelmann - Jörg @kachelmann anderswo: @realkachelmann

@Erdenbewohner62 Keine Zeit für die Befassung mit frei erfundenem Schwachsinn dummer faktenresistenter Schmierlappen.

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 12:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
German is a collective term encompassing Bavarians, Prussians, Saxons, as well as minorities like Frisians, Danes, Sorbs, and Roma/Sinti. There is no homogeneous German people. #Germany #Diversity

@AfdHannover - AfD Hannover

@Wertebold @andersbresing @Stolzler91 @MT_Neumann Wir haben geschrieben, dass Deutsch ein Sammelbegriff ist, dabei haben wir eine Metapher über Tee verwendet Deutsche, als Sammelbegriff für Bayern, Preussen, Sachsen, sowie Minderheiten aus Friesen, Dänen, Sorben & Roma/Sinti Es existiert kein homogenes deutsches Volk

Saved - December 8, 2023 at 7:57 AM

@trash_tante - Trash Tante

Wenn man dem Tino in die Augen schaut, merkt man schon, dass im Oberstübchen keine Musik spielt.#Lanz https://t.co/ESUyEUiw1T

@trash_tante - Trash Tante

Leute, ich komme mit dem blockieren nicht mehr nach.Bitte nur ein Nazi nachdem anderen.

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 8:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have compiled a list of my favorite users who speak out against the woke virus. They include @goddeketal, @AlphaFox78, @dom_lucre, @TRHLofficial, @ZubyMusic, @KimDotcom, @catturd2, @WallStreetSilv, @TuckerCarlson, @thecoastguy, @EvaVlaar, @MdBreathe, @jordanbpeterson, @Lukewearechange, @FiveTimesAugust, @Riley_Gaines_, @DrLoupis, @Tiffany_Gomas, @elonmusk, @jimmy_dore, @Timcast, @joerogan, @hodgetwins, and @realalexjones. I am grateful to @goddeketal for providing background information.

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

🧵THREAD: In times where men are women and women are men, where children’s genitaIs can be amputated without parental consent, and war is peace, it requires individuals who vehemently speak out against this woke virus. I, as Dr Clown, have compiled a list of my favorite users who dedicate themselves wholeheartedly to ensuring that George Orwell's 1984 does not become a reality. Thank you for your existence!

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

#1 Meet @goddeketal, who published papers on the PCR tests' false-positive rates and how high vitamin D levels prevent you from getting sick. He was consequently canceled as a scientist and fled to the Brazilian jungle. Follow him and his vitamin D startup, @sunfluencer. https://t.co/1DMwhpk4sY

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer #2 Meet @AlphaFox78, a humorous person on a mission to bring laughter and sanity to the X-verse (former Twitterverse)! With a unique blend of wit, sarcasm, and pop culture references, he is here to brighten your day and make you question the nature of reality. #TMFIR https://t.co/P4krNpYVdv

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 #3 Meet @dom_lucre, an influential voice on this platform known for breaking narratives and shedding light on important issues like child exploitation, the Black community, and social media influence. Despite challenges, he remains dedicated to truth and transparency. https://t.co/fNv34GF34A

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre #4 Meet @TRHLofficial, a fierce voice on X tackling controversial topics with a focus on individual freedom, limited government, and free markets. With a sharp wit and a sense of humor to match her red hair, she's unafraid to challenge the status quo. https://t.co/t9HS7OZU3H

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial #5 Meet @ZubyMusic, a UK rapper, author, and influencer known for his thought-provoking content and commitment to authenticity. On X, Zuby advocates for personal growth, self-improvement, and the pursuit of truth. https://t.co/QZyrOMmxoN

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic #6 Meet @KimDotcom the larger-than-life who's been shaking up the digital world since the days of dial-up modems. With a Twitter feed that's part tech genius, part international playboy, and 100% entertaining, you never know what he'll be up to next. https://t.co/V2x04uSu8w

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom NO, NOT YOU! GFY, Bill! https://t.co/ZKyzgrp4o1

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom #7 Meet @catturd2, the king of sh-tposting who's been stirring the pot with hilarious takes on politics and culture. With a sharp wit and a knack for making waves, he's the reason your timeline is never dull. Follow for a daily dose of laughter & a fresh conservative perspective! https://t.co/iHT1H9KqKr

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 #8 Meet @WallStreetSilv, the silverback gorilla of finance who's been shaking up the market with his shiny tweets. With a passion for precious metals, he's the reason your portfolio has never looked more lustrous. Follow for a silver opportunity to learn and laugh! https://t.co/GkSLNJeGcS

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv #9 Meet @TuckerCarlson, the fearless crusader of truth in a sea of mainstream media spin. Dodging bullets of criticism with a smirk, he stands as a beacon of free speech for those tired of the same old song. https://t.co/oAHM0qzp5g

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson #10 Meet @thecoastguy, the historian who makes the past come alive. Known for his based views, he's like a time-traveling rebel, providing you with historical insights and present-day commentary. Follow him or send a postcard to: "The guy who needs a haircut, Stirling, Scotland." https://t.co/9QkSG9Ilwu

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy #11 Meet @EvaVlaar, a Dutch conservative and legal philosopher. Passionate about farmers' rights and a critic of the Dutch government, she's a frequent guest on international talk shows. Follow her, and there are rumors she follows back if you can perfectly pronounce her surname. https://t.co/yXm7oIz285

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar #12 Meet @MdBreathe, a vocal advocate for early treatment who is in round 10 against the TX Medical Board, seemingly on the ropes but not down. Known for her battle with the FDA, she's a fighter for patient-doctor relationships. Follow for a ringside view of healthcare advocacy! https://t.co/EDnPlbCS1M

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe NO, NOT YOU! GFY, Peter! https://t.co/hpvjEDVGfd

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe #13 Meet @jordanbpeterson, a modern-day philosopher king, boldly navigating the chaos of our times. With his sharp wit and no-nonsense approach, he cuts through the noise, offering pearls of wisdom on everything from free speech to lobsters. A true beacon in a sea of confusion! https://t.co/do47zjkvI7

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson #14 Meet @lukewearechange, the fearless truth-teller and 'detective with a camera.' Tackling taboo topics, confronting the likes of Kissinger, and even braving arrest to question Mayor Bloomberg, he's always a step ahead in unveiling the hidden. A must follow! https://t.co/y71MWJgQxp

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange #15 Meet @FiveTimesAugust, the musical maestro who’s not afraid to strum the strings of truth. With tunes that resonate more than mainstream media narratives, he's a one-man band standing up to the woke chorus. A melody of free speech in a symphony of silenced voices! https://t.co/CXoqkYBBGt

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust #16 Meet @Riley_Gaines_, the fierce advocate and swim star taking a stand against the current of 'trans madness' in women's sports. Her lane? Championing fair competition and women's rights. A true contender in and out of the pool, making waves for justice! https://t.co/AvtVUuQHph

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ #17 Meet @DrLoupis, a bold voice in health and politics, unafraid to tackle what the media won't touch. Accused of antisemitism merely for speaking out, she stands as a beacon of common sense and clarity. With sharp insights, she's the doctor for body and mind, and truth. https://t.co/AYx5T3ts5n

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis #18 Meet @Tiffany_Gomas, the real-life protagonist of the viral 'TMFINR' plane incident. Known for her outburst about a "not real" person aboard, she quickly became an internet sensation. Despite the frenzy, she's proving she's more than just a viral moment. https://t.co/60QqX1iEhp

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas NO, NOT YOU! GFY, Anthony! https://t.co/W7U3akAm1N

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas #19 Meet @elonmusk, the real-life Tony Stark reshaping our world one tweet at a time. From launching rockets to Mars with SpaceX to revolutionizing the road with Tesla, he's the visionary behind some of the most groundbreaking innovations of our era. His tweets? Mainly trolling. https://t.co/UIKtCFfuJj

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas @elonmusk #20 Meet @jimmy_dore, the fiercely independent comedian and political commentator who's not afraid to challenge the status quo. With a style rooted in 'stickin' it to the man' comedy, he's known for his sharp, incendiary takes on politics. https://t.co/IAnTLCzZbs

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas @elonmusk @jimmy_dore #21 Meet @Timcast, a podcaster known for his distinctive woolly hat, a fashion statement so iconic he'd probably even wear it in a sauna. From live streaming Occupy Wall Street to hosting Timcast IRL, he's a vocal figure in digital media and voice of reason. https://t.co/HtX6Lsp2CT

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas @elonmusk @jimmy_dore @Timcast #22 Meet @joerogan, a renowned American comedian, podcast host, and mixed martial arts enthusiast. With his popular podcast, Joe has made a name for himself in the world of long-form conversations, discussing a wide range of topics with guests from all walks of life. https://t.co/XWrCAasBbF

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas @elonmusk @jimmy_dore @Timcast @joerogan #23 Meet @hodgetwins, the twin brothers who've conquered the internet. With a YouTube channel that'll make you laugh and a X feed that'll make you think, these Marine Corps veterans turned social media stars are the reason your abs and your brain get a workout at the same time! https://t.co/2cUgBQkRLE

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

@goddeketal @sunfluencer @Alphafox78 @dom_lucre @TRHLofficial @ZubyMusic @KimDotcom @catturd2 @WallStreetSilv @TuckerCarlson @thecoastguy @EvaVlaar @MdBreathe @jordanbpeterson @Lukewearechange @FiveTimesAugust @Riley_Gaines_ @DrLoupis @Tiffany_Gomas @elonmusk @jimmy_dore @Timcast @joerogan @hodgetwins #24 Meet @realalexjones, the master of outlandish conspiracy theories who never fails to entertain. His tales are so wild, they'd have Elon Musk momentarily reactivate his Twitter account just to see what's next. Fun fact: most of them come true. https://t.co/OhnYAdigS3

@CW_Insider - Dr. Clown, PhD

#25 Lastly, I would like to introduce myself. I am an entrepreneur from Quebec, now living in Mexico and worried about this world. I take a strong stance against the Woke Virus, which has infected our civilization with memes and bold statements. Also, I want to thank @goddeketal for helping me find background information about my personal heroes. I hope he doesn't mind his Tarzan depiction.

Saved - February 13, 2024 at 11:56 AM

@pawelwargan - Paweł Wargan

Germany is deeply sick. https://t.co/qKvvpOITdL

Saved - December 27, 2024 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In July 1956, U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles announced the withdrawal of financial support for Egypt's Aswan Dam, which led to President Nasser's nationalization of the Suez Canal. This crisis inadvertently strengthened Franco-German relations and European integration, with Konrad Adenauer maintaining ties with Dulles and advocating for economic cooperation. The aftermath of Suez saw Britain and France's decline as powers, paving the way for the Treaty of Rome in 1957, which symbolized a shift towards a united Europe, reminiscent of a new Roman Empire.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The Civil Roman Empire July 1956, John Foster Dulles announced US financial withdrawal for the Aswan Dam on the Nile. “Egypt should get along for the time being with projects less monumental than the Aswan Dam.” Five days later Nasser nationalized the Suez canal.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

While maybe it was Eisenhower who took the decision, the provocation was completely on the part of Dulles. Eisenhower commented later: “I was concerned … that we might have been undiplomatic in the way the cancellation was handled.” New York Times, 1971. https://www.nytimes.com/1971/01/16/archives/experts-feel-dulles-blundered-in-dropping-offer-to-aid-cairo.html

Experts Feel Dulles Blundered In Dropping Offer to Aid Cairo (Published 1971) US Govt and acad Middle East specialists, in retrospect, believe that US Sec Dulles erred on June 19, 1956 when he withdrew US offer to help UAR begin Aswan High Dam; contend that manner of rebuff to sensibilities of UAR's people and particularly to Pres Nasser hurt US interests more than act of canceling proposed aid offer; map of UAR indicating Aswan Dam site; incident, in which GB withdrew accompanying $14-million offer and IBRD withdrew $200-million offer, recalled; Nasser subsequently announced nationalization of Suez Canal and resulting Israeli-French-Brit attack in Oct '56 gave him virtually unassailable hold on Arab world; some experts defend Dulles's actions; defense presented by Prof U Ra'nanan in book The USSR Arms the Third World discussed; Ra'nanan comments, int; other specialists cite anti-Soviet pol climate in '56 and broad support for Dulles's handling of UAR nytimes.com

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The Suez crisis gave Germany the opportunity to improve Franco-German relations, increasing the process of further European integration. Against the advice of his counsel, Konrad Adenauer did not cancel his visit to the Paris conference on November 1956.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Remember, Dulles had always been deciding in favor of Germany, was very close with Hjalmar Schacht and had a very good relationship with Adenauer who already said during the interbellum that Franco-German peace would require economic integration.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Van der Beugel had not doubt that of all foreign statesman Dulles felt closest to chancellor of West-Germany Konrad Adenauer. Adenauer already said during the interbellum that peace between France and Germany would be only possible through a community of economic interests.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Adenauer was married to Auguste Zinsser, a cousin of Ellen McCloy, née Zinsser, husband of John McCloy that together with Dulles advocated for the Marshall Plan, or European Recovery Program (ERP), focusing on German integration in Western economies.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

During the hearing of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, the Marshall Plan was discussed. Among the speakers was not only Foster Dulles (and John McCloy) but also Bernard Baruch with whom he wrote the reparations section of the Versailles Treaty.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Adenauer signed the ERP with the US in 1949, together with McCloy. During the Wiedergutmachung negotiations Adenauer successfully requested his relative to provide clemency for war criminals like Alfried Krupp and Herman Schmitz, former IG Farban CEO. https://www.swr.de/swr2/wissen/archivradio/konrad-adenauer-unterschreibt-den-marshallplan-1949-102.html

Konrad Adenauer unterschreibt den "Marshallplan" | 15.12.1949 Bundeskanzler Konrad Adenauer unterzeichnet 1949 den Marshallplan European Recovery Program (ERP) zusammen mit dem Hohen Kommissar der Vereinigten Staaten in der Bundesrepublik John Jay McCloy. swr.de

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

But can’t we link Adenauer more directly to the Mitteleuropa phenomenon? Yes, and in order to do so I start with this conversation between Hjalmar Schacht and Gustav Stresemann that I found in the auto-biography of Schacht, 76 Jahre meines Lebens.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“We have to undertake something, Herr Stresemann. When the Left now comes into play, then some. So we must start a civil left party, so that the Mehrheitsozialisten [MSPD, name of a political party] do not take the field alone.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

As you see, in their eyes, facing the enemy in a debate, that’s for fools. You put a comparable party alongside, reducing your enemy’s backing. Other options are: start a radicalized version of the opposing party and thereby detach the public from their ideas. Infiltration. Or..

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Question: what happened with the non-radical worker party in your country? Back to that party DDP party Schacht is talking about. The party he, according to himself, started with Stresemann.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Should Mitteleuropa Party not be an appropriate name if we see all these names appearing? You did read my previous parts, didn’t you?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

So, why is that important? Because “after World War II former members of the DDP were instrumental in founding both the West German Free Democratic Party (FDP)” Moreover, the party provided many ministers under Chancellor Adenauer.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

So Mitteleuropa party DDP was instrumental for the political climate in Germany after the war. Did Adenauer and Schacht, basically President Mitteleuropa, knew each other? Of course. First, meet Otto Skorzenzy, Reinhard Gehlen and the Gehlen Organization. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehlen_Organization

Gehlen Organization - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The Gehlen Organization was a spy network formed by Abwehr Admiral Canaris in 1942. It was absorbed by the CIA in 1948. “Gehlen’s backing came primarily from the Dulles faction” It contracted “some of the most notorious figures from the Nazi regime”.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The Gehlen Organization provided intelligence on the Soviet Union for the CIA using war criminals, the biggest scum on earth. And this criminal organization came to be the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) in 1952 reporting directly to Konrad Adenauer.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Skorzeny was provided a hide-out by Countess Ilse Lüthje, the niece of Hjalmar Schacht, for around 18 months. During that time he was in contact with Gehlen, and recruited for the Gehlen Organization. He filed a divorce so he could marry Ilse Lüthje. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Skorzeny

Otto skorzeny - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“In 1952, Egypt was taken over by General Mohammed Naguib. Skorzeny was sent to Egypt the following year by former General Reinhard Gehlen” “He stayed on to serve as an adviser to Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Now, with that knowledge, don’t you feel that the Suez crisis was deliberately set in motion by the (infiltrated) Washington-Bonn axis, to drive France in particular into the hands of the Germans? What was the ultimate consequence of the Dulles provocation and the Suez crisis?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Well, in March 1957 the Treaty of R·O·M·E was signed. Borrell (2022): “This is a point that we do not highlight enough. When you put the history of European construction into its global geopolitical context, you will notice that the Treaty of Rome, signed in 1957, came one year

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

after the Suez debacle. The Treaty of Rome was therefore basically a peaceful and constructive response to the abandonment by the European powers of their colonial heritage…”. As per @_benoux_ told me. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/le-grand-continent-conversation-hrvp_en

Le Grand Continent - A conversation with the HR/VP   High Representative/Vice President Josep Borrell gives an in-depth interview to Le Grand Continent on a variety of issues. Available in English, French, Spanish and Italian. eeas.europa.eu

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

In there, Borrell reiterates what Heinz Alfred Kissinger from Fürth, Bavaria already said in Diplomacy: “bringing home to them the end of their roles as Great Powers.” Suez proved to be the realization for France and Britain that European integration had to be their future.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Do you understand the implications above for the establishment of the EU? And this is just the warm-up of the thread. Did you pay attention to the title? There are so many more things to clear up. They have sold you lies, so many lies. I cannot even comprehend. Let’s continue. 👇

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

With France and Britain down, how about The Netherlands? Well The Netherlands was in the international headlines right before the Suez crisis. What was going on? “Zwischen köningin und Rasputin” That was the frontpage of Der Spiegel in June 1956. https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/index-1956-24.html

DER SPIEGEL 24/1956 - Inhaltsverzeichnis spiegel.de

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

There was a crisis in the Dutch monarchy. According to the German magazine, Queen Juliana became under the influence of a miracle doctor (‘Gesundbeterin’) who was supposedly working on divine orders. The article continues.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“The American secret service in The Hague, which is observing the case on behalf of its boss Allen Dulles, is once again faced with a European puzzle” Well, well, isn’t that interesting? June 1956, only a month before Suez, and we have another Dulles. Brother Allen this time.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

It was husband Prince Bernhard who provided the information for the article. He finally admitted that in 2004. It was an attempt to cancel Greet Hofmans and thereby stop her alleged too big of influence on personal, social and political level to his wife Queen Juliana.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

And that attempt succeeded. In 1957 Juliana had to fire a well-beloved part of her court personnel. On top, she was not allowed to visit the so-called Oude Loo conferences anymore and she was not allowed to meet Hofmans and associated friends again. What happened?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Now, in The Netherlands there are many books on the Greet Hofmans affair, but, honestly, nobody got the full picture. Those that were on the right track, like Klinkenberg, did not have sources I am about to cite, while people like Fasseur blatantly defended Bernhard.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“He [Bernhard] just wanted his wife back”. 2008, didn't we then already know of his mistresses and bastard children? I have referred to Hélène Grinda often here. His involvement in Lockheed, the bribery scandals? His chairmanship of Bilderberg? https://www.parool.nl/kunst-media/fasseur-prikt-mythe-hofmans-door~b2ed7106/?referrer=https://www.google.com/

Fasseur prikt mythe Hofmans door parool.nl

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

If the life of Bernhard tells you one thing: he was rather away from home. No, no, this affair was not about his marriage. Now who was Bernhard anyway? To begin with, he was chairman of the Bilderberg Conferences, of which the first conference was organized in 1954.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

One month before the Treaty of Rome was delivered, the influential Bilderberg Group met in St Simon. HRH Prince Bernhard was chairman while Joseph Retinger was honorary secretary. It is said, though speculative, that the Treaty of Rome was formulated there.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Retinger was Polish and former MI6 agent (Salamander). Bernhard was an intelligence agent for chemical company IG Farben in the unit Berlin-NW7. His boss was Max Ilgner, nephew of later IG Farben CEO Herman Schmitz.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Maximiliane was a countess and the granddaughter of Dr. Eugen Lucius, a founder of Hoechst AG. On the other hand, Moritz Philipp Freiherr von Bethmann is listed as co-founder of Degussa in 1873. The main founder of Degussa is Friedrich Roessler.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Brother Rudolf Ilgner was director of Farben subsidiary Chemnyco Inc in NYC. The lawyers involved? Sullivan & Cromwell, the company of the Dulles brothers. Max Ilgner directly mentioned Bernhard in the Nuremberg trials as one of his Verbindungsmänner.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard was also member of the paramilitary of the NSDAP (SA) and the SS. During his time in Paris he stayed with Allene Tew, then married to Pavel de Kotzebue. Bernhard’s mother Armgard was acquainted to the Kotzebue family. Allene became godmother of princess Beatrix.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Gerhard Fritze, formerly married to an Ilgner, was the highest officer in NL for IG NW7. He introduced Bernhard to Juliana. Fritze founded Hollandsche Koopmansbank, a subsidiary of IG Farben and under influence of Ivar Kreuger. https://www.groene.nl/artikel/barretje-weimar--2

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Wall Street panicked in 1932 when Ivar Kreuger committed suicide and his business turned out to be a pyramid scheme. Foster Dulles became legal counsel, while good friend Monnet became liquidator for Kreuger and their lawyer firm Lee, Higginson & Co.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Mother and then queen Wilhelmina, according to TIME the richest woman on earth, vouched for the marriage under the pretext that Bernhard would resign at his former employer. Who asks a spy to quit his intelligence work? But Bernhard formally complied. https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,802335,00.html

NEW YORK: Lang Leve de Koningin Lang Leave de KoninginWilhelmina Helena Pauline Maria, Princess of Orange-Nassau, age 61, the sturdy, solid, cheerful Queen of The Netherlands, has been living a quiet and well-regulated life with... content.time.com

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard and Juliana had four daughters, including Marijke, born with an eye disease. Hofmans was introduced by the recommendation of Bernhard and lived with the family. It was the beginning of an intimate friendship between her, Juliana, Wilhelmina and the rest of the household.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Alhough Bernhard denied Hofmans access to the Royal Palace shortly after her arrival, the friendship remained. They frequently met to talk about religion. The dissertation Spirit of the Oude Loo shows how all that evolved into the Oude Loo conferences. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/33647

De geest van het Oude Loo. Juliana en haar vriendenkring 1947-1957 | Scholarly Publications scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

So not only did Bernhard had his Bilderberg conferences, Juliana had hers too. The first Oude Loo conference in 1951 was titled “God is the creator of the world and therefore invincible.” God’s Providence and world peace were central topics. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oude_Loo-conferenties

Oude loo-conferenties - Wikipedia nl.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Visitors were important figures from aristocratic, academic or religious backgrounds under whom many women. You visited the conference once; it was not to become a group nor a sect. Queen Juliana visited almost every conference while princess Wilhelmina visited regularly.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

To emphasize what the conferences were about, this is of vital important, the scheduled lectures of the third edition carried titles like the following: - God’s Plan or human chaos - The guiding Hand and the inner voice - Towards a Christian civilization

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Why did Oude Loo, and associating friendships, had to end so brutally, with that publication in Der Spiegel? There was no political power involved at all. Why would Bernhard care so much while he had his mistresses and own activities like Bilderberg with actual political power?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

A Committee (“of Wise Men”) was assigned by the Dutch government to resolve the matter. They advocated Juliana to refrain from any involvement at the conferences, break contacts with underlying friendships and fire involved court personnel.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard? He basically only had to break with journalist Sefton Delmer, the one he passed the story and also only allowed journalist at Bilderberg. And Bilderberg? He could keep it despite Juliana’s not unsubstantial claim that it should be subject to ministerial responsibility.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Juliana protested and claimed “Am I not free to choose the people who I associate with, and does the freedom of religious believe not also apply to me?” She was not to have it. Compare that with today. Of whom is said today she has to have the right to freedom of speech?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard went berserk by his wife’s protest. He demanded follow-up on the committee advice. Otherwise, he threatened, he would go to the press again. He considered a request to remove Queen Juliana from her parental authority or even be her declared incompetent. He went all in.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Again, why put all the stakes down? And then I remembered the bizarre skiing trip of Juliana with her friends in 1950. Bernhard sent his mistress Ann Orr-Lewis to spy on his wife! She stayed together with her friend Phyllis von Graevenitz in the same hotel as Juliana.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Now that is really interesting. Didn’t Ernst von Weizsäcker marry Marianne von Graevenitz? And was Bernhard’s brother Aschwin not serving under Abwehr admiral Canaris, leader of the “anti-nazi” group Von Weizsäcker belonged to?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

In 1943 Von Weizsäcker became Ambassador to the Vatican. In the Nuremberg trials Ernst von Weizsäcker was sentenced to 7 years, but he was made a free man within 3 years by... John McCloy. His son Richard became Bundespräsident in 1984.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

According to Dulles, Wolff had an audience with the Pope, member of his staff Dollmann and German Ambassador to the Vatican Ernst von Weizsäcker, father of later President of Germany (“in a united Europe, we want to serve the peace of the world.”).

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

So to Operation Sunrise again. Von Weizsäcker provided introductions but before Wolff could meet Pope Pius XII, he first had to free a.o. Donna Virginia Agnelli, a family that later frequently visited Bilderberg. Then Wolff and Pope Pius XII spoke in latter’s private library.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The content of that meeting was never disclosed. Why wouldn’t Operation Sunrise be related to that exchange? But if so, then what was to rise? As nuncio of Bavaria, Pacelli (real name of Pope Pius XII) met Kaiser Wilhelm and Von Bethmann Hollweg.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The Civilist Empire, part 3 In 1909 Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg became Reichskanzler. He succeeded Bülow and inherited Tirpitz’s Grand Design. “Throughout his life he had been a devout monarchist and a loyal servant of the crown.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“In Berlin he lived in the Tiergarten quarter and threw parties for the official and diplomatic elite. Paul von Hindenburg, Gustav Stresemann, and other members of the Cabinet were regular guests.” Stresemann, remember his conversation with Schacht? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XII

Pope Pius XII - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

All controversies around Pope Pius accused him to support Nazi Germany, but does the connection with Stresemann, whose ideal was a grand German Mitteleuropa, and the conversation with Von Weizsäcker and Wolff not suggest Pius rather vouched for Mitteleuropa?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

A European construction formalized in a Treaty of Rome, with the vouch of the Pope. Doesn’t that remind you of a historical empire? What else is Mitteleuropa, or the European Union if you like, other than a new Roman Empire? Thát was what had to rise in Operation Sunrise.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

This empire is not particularly Christian, even though the Pope approved it. By advocating an Ethic of Innocence, see my civilism theory, the Civil Roman Empire wishes to usurp and appropriate world religions.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Civilism, The Post-War Defense Shield of Humility. The full theory.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Only that gives a full explanation to what happened in the Hofmans affair. Participants at Oude Loo were from various backgrounds: Protestants, Catholics, Muslims, Hindus and Theosophists. Therefore, some academics analyzed it as New Age. Incorrectly.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Their road to world peace was not via inner spirituality, but through the unconditional individual surrender to God. They were dreaming of a hyper-individual Christian theocracy. And that went directly against the subsidiarity idea of Rome the Mitteleuropa-gang was dreaming of.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard could not let it happen that his wife and Queen Juliana would succeed in reaching these religions and pave a road toward world peace. In that sense, the radical red leftists in The Netherlands who chose the side of Juliana, like Klinkenberg, were right. But

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

they were wrong on her motive. She was not siding with the Dutch peace movement The Third Path as Klinkenberg was suggesting. No. “It was time for the Omnipotent to rule the earth according to His providence, of which mere mortals could have no idea how that would turn out.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Put another way, this was a battle for the post-war dialectic. And Bernhard was not prepared to take the risk that his wife would ruin his plans. He had to silence her and her friends while Oude Loo was still of minor authority and credibility. This plan succeeded.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Now we are getting somewhere with this thread. I have shown how the Suez crisis was set in motion and how former world powers France and The Netherlands were driven into the hands of Germany to participate in a new Roman Empire, not a holy but a civil one.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Let’s return to Suez again and focus on the British. “In the summer of 1956, Stockwell rejected the Contingency Plan [..] and instead submitted Operation Musketeer, [..] and then for British armoured forces to engage in a decisive battle of annihilation with the Egyptians [..]”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“Worldwide reaction against Musketeer was massive and negative. [..] the United States threatened to devalue the British currency [..] Prime Minister Sir Anthony Eden called a ceasefire, without Israeli or French officials being notified.” Eden resigned a few weeks later.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Contemporary historians portray Eden as having made the disastrous decision to use force against Nasser. And while it was his decision indeed, we have already seen it was Foster Dulles that first caused the nationalization. Not Eden.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Moreover, Eden signed the Anglo-Egyptian Agreement of 1954 causing Britain to abandon its military bases in the Canal Zone. Next to the US, Eden was also stabbed in the back by Chancellor Macmillan when he threatened to resign in case of no ceasefire. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54v09p2/d1348

Historical Documents - Office of the Historian history.state.gov 3.0 shell history.state.gov

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Macmillan first informed Eden the US would not stop an invasion, then made the threat and finally walked away with Eden's job to become Prime Minister. After Suez, David Astor accused Eden and his government of lies and as such destroyed his reputation. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2001/dec/09/past.comment

David Astor's Suez leader This editorial, which appeared in The Observer on 4 November 1956, has been hailed as one of the most significant of the twentieth century. Britain and France had launched air attacks on Egypt after President Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal. Astor took the Government to task for its bullying and in so doing defined The Observer as a freethinking paper prepared to swim against the tide of popular sentiment. theguardian.com

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Didn’t we meet David Astor in the Dulles-thread when I laid out the post-war initiatives to unite Europe? Astor was close with Van Zeeland, who visited the Bilderberg conference after the Suez crisis, and of course with the Dulles brothers.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Towards the end of the war more initiatives to unite Europe were initiated, e.g. those of Coudenhove-Kalergi and Van Zeeland. It was David Astor, liaising between the SOE and French resistance, that activated the production of Draft Declaration of the European Resistances.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Before the war foreign secretary Eden warned people to speak with nazi and SS-officer Egon von Hohenlohe, who frequently visited Allen and Clover Dulles in NYC. Not only did Dulles ignore that warning, he also visited Lord and Lady Astor at Cliveden. https://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/11/annabel-astor-british-noble-ginge-manor

Inside the Very Charmed World of British Noble Annabel Astor From a topsy-turvy childhood, Annabel Astor has made a name for herself as a businesswoman and the manager of a spectacular home: Ginge Manor. As her aristo-chic furnishings company, OKA, reaches the U.S., the viscountess welcomes Bob Colacello to the hub of her jet-set existence. vanityfair.com

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“heyday of entertaining at Cliveden was between the two World Wars” Visitors included: Winston Churchill, Joseph Kennedy, Arthur Balfour and Rudyard Kipling. Before Macmillan became politician he joined their family publishing business that published works of Rudyard Kipling.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

During Macmillan’s term as Prime Minister, conservative politician John Profumo visited Cliveden, as friend of Lord Astor. In the Pavilion Spa he crossed paths with Christine Keeler – “and an affair which would shake Westminster to its foundations began.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“The so-called Profumo Affair would see Macmillan’s Government humiliated, an election lost, Keeler imprisoned and Ward dead by his own hand, accused of procuring young women for politicians” https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/reading-berkshire-news/cliveden-britains-most-scandalous-country-26303190

Britain's 'most scandalous' country home where a government collapsed Along with the Profumo Affair, it also hosted the Cliveden Set - an upper-crust political think tank with sympathies for Nazi Germany getreading.co.uk

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

We see the same figures with one of the most successful spies of the Soviet regime. Double-agent Kim Philby or "the spy who betrayed a generation", was comprised in 1951. After repeated interrogation he was exonerated by Macmillan in 1955. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/28/kim-philby-david-astor-observer

Kim Philby, the Observer connection and the establishment world of spies

Fifty years after Kim Philby fled to Moscow while working for the Observer, new light is being shed on the links that united a clubland elite with a taste for secret service adventures

theguardian.com

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Philby worked for The Observer, the newspaper owned by David Astor. No, no, he was not a spy tells Lewis who wrote a biography on Astor. “By contrast, Astor went to Oxford and mixed with anti-Nazi intellectuals such as Adam von Trott zu Solz”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

And it was Eden who was positioned against these people. He already stood against them during the interbellum when he refused to support Chamberlain’s policy and resigned. He was replaced by another Cliveden hero: Lord Halifax.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

To top it off, Eden was not having a good relationship with the Dulles boys. Not a surprise considering how they close they were with the Cliveden people. Eden wrote Eisenhower and asked him to not choose Foster as his Secretary of State. They really never got along.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Some might put Eden in the Cliveden group. His wife Clarissa, née Spencer-Churchill, was close with both Evelyn Waugh and Alice Astor. This could be, but my guess is that Clarissa was put next to Eden. They married on very short notice in 1952. https://www.groene.nl/artikel/hou-een-dagboek-bij

Hou een dagboek bij! CLARISSA EDEN A MEMOIR: FROM CHURCHILL TO EDEN (geredigeerd door Cate Haste) Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 288 blz., € 27,- groene.nl

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Final remark on Suez: that threat to devaluate the sterling by the US was quite something, no? “While the exact cause of Macmillan’s attitude [towards financial fears] remains clouded, it was this attitude which finally induced a change of policy by Cabinet and by Eden.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

How substantial was that threat? Also in Sir Anthony Eden and the Suez Crisis: “It is therefore possible that Macmillan exaggerated the figures to ensure panic, or had miscalculated the figures and frightened himself.” “The Treasury must have got at him, from every direction…”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Since Macmillan was Chancellor of the Exchequer himself that last quote must refer to the Bank of England. Who was running their Court of Directors? Cameron Cobbold. Was he not working at the BIS with the people we met in part 2? Do you get the picture?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Friedrich Reinhart was CEO from Commerzbank from 1934 until his death in 1943. Together with Schacht, Thyssen, Kurt Frhr. von Schröder and others, he signed the Industrielleneingabe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrielleneingabe

Industrielleneingabe - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The finishing touch toward treaty ratification was given by Jean Monnet, close friend of Foster Dulles. His Action Committee ('57) was full of Bilderberg visitors: Mollet, Kiesinger, Fanfani, Faure, La Malfa, Lefèvre, Pleven, and friends like Uri, Marjolin, and Fontaine.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“This episode shows that the Monnet Action Committee was sufficiently powerful to co-ordinate action between the France and West German parliaments and to hold its course in the face of a French government crisis.” https://jean-monnet.ch/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/the-father-of-europe.pdf

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Wall Street panicked in 1932 when Ivar Kreuger committed suicide and his business turned out to be a pyramid scheme. Foster Dulles became legal counsel, while good friend Monnet became liquidator for Kreuger and their lawyer firm Lee, Higginson & Co.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

In 1963 the community from the Treaty of Rome was upgraded into a constitutional legal order. “THE COMMUNITY CONSTITUTES A NEW LEGAL ORDER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW” https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:1963:1

Standalone view - EUR-LexLog inEnglish eur-lex.europa.eu

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“Based on comprehensive archival studies, this article argues that neither earlier case law nor the Treaties of Rome can fully account for the judgment. Instead, Van Gend en Loos represented a genuine revolution in European law.” https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/12/1/136/628616

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“It is probably exactly the fear of the ECJ that historical scholarship might undermine the legitimacy of the court which has caused the delay in opening the archive of the ECJ.” Legitimacy? Let’s have a look at those involved, shall we?

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Let’s start with judge André, also ECJ-president and father of Piet Hein Donner. He was part of The Committee of Three that investigated the Lockheed scandal and dared to deem that Bernhard might even have acted in good faith.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

In 2019 mr. J.P.H. Donner has been appointed chairman of the board of the Carnegie Peace Palace Foundation by Royal Decree. https://www.vredespaleis.nl/hein-donner-bestuursvoorzitter-carnegie-stichting-vredespaleis/

Mr. Donner is per Koninklijk besluit benoemd tot bestuursvoorzitter Carnegie Stichting Vredespaleis | Peace Palace Mr. J.P.H. Donner is per Koninklijk Besluit benoemd tot bestuursvoorzitter van de Carnegie Stichting Vredespaleis. De heer Donner wordt ook bestuursvoorzitter van de Haagse Academie voor internationaal recht, die gevestigd is in het Vredespaleis. Hij volgt hiermee Dr. Bernard Bot op, wiens bestuurstermijn afloopt op 1 maart 2019 en die beide functies de afgelopen 12 […] vredespaleis.nl

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard’s IG Farben history was of course never mentioned, but that was important, because Lockheed had hired Frank Fahle at the suggestion of Herman Abs, both people Bernhard knew from his time at Berlin NW7. Money received by German Minister of Defense Franz Josef Strauss.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Bernhard always denied to have received money. The committee declared in their official statement that he “had entered into those transactions far too lightly”. Via a journalist Bernhard posthumously told he actually did receive money, but it was transferred to charity, his WWF.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

For the record, according to two oral testimonies 40y later, Donner was not among the four judges that voted favored the ruling, but among the three against. Rasmussen calls these testimonies circumstantial evidence.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“the two new judges Trabucchi and Lecourt managed to turn the tide with two memoranda, which both favoured granting Article 12 internal effects” “Trabucchi and Lecourt managed to bring Rino Rossi and the Louis Delvaux to their side.” https://www.jstor.org/stable/23270670

JSTOR: Access Check JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources. jstor.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Rasmussen continues, referring to an internal document by Trabucchi, a published one. “instead pointed to a standard work on international law, Völkerrecht by Alfred Verdross, and the supranational/federal position in the legal debate in general.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Okay, so the reasoning for invoking a new legal order came from Verdross. Who was Verdross? Now it becomes even more interesting. “He was a pan-German nationalist and an early sympathizer with Nazism, but did not join the Nazi party.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Verdross

Alfred verdross - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“became, among other things, member of the International Law Commission, member of the Permanent Court of Arbitration” “became professor at the University of Michigan Law School [..], and served as a judge on the International Court of Justice”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The Civilist Empire, part 1 The International Court of Justice is located at the Carnegieplein in The Hague.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“The exact extent of Verdross's sympathy for Nazism remains debated,” Just like Bernhard, Von Weizsäcker, Pope Pius, Cliveden Set figures, Dulles brothers, etc? Well, considering their actions, I suggest they were not nazi’s, but pro empire: a Civil Roman Empire.

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

But we continue with Verdross, the most important pupil of legal philosopher Hans Kelsen. “In 1933–1934 his assistant at the Consular Academy was Friedrich August Freiherr von der Heydte, at the time an SA member, whom he had recommended to Kelsen in Cologne.”

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

“Heydte gained audience with Pope Pius XII and befriended the Pope's "Throne Assistant", the theologian Alois Hudal, who would later become a key person in helping Nazi war criminals evade the courts of justice during the post-war war-crime trials.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_August_Freiherr_von_der_Heydte

Friedrich August Freiherr von der Heydte - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Pope Pius XII again. But there is more. Von der Heydte was involved with Operation Market Garden, serving under General Reinhard in the LXXXVIII Corps. He was being informed by a Belgian informant that an attack was underway. https://www.omroepbrabant.nl/nieuws/3063124/de-spanning-aan-het-front-is-voelbaar-de-duitsers-worden-getipt

De spanning aan het front is voelbaar, de Duitsers worden getipt 15 september 1944. Vandaag weinig activiteit aan het front, het lijkt stilte voor de storm. Het is de opmaat naar een belangrijke week met een ophanden zijnde offensief van de geallieerden: Operatie Market Garden. Engelse vliegvelden maken zich op voor het offensief en ook in Leopoldsburg in België arriveren steeds versterkingen. Dit speelt op weg naar de bevrijding van Brabant. Iedere dag lees je alle gebeurtenissen van die dag in 1944. omroepbrabant.nl

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

The first Bilderberg meeting was held in Oosterbeek, the place where so many soldiers lost their lives in Operation Market Garden. Do the Dutch realize Bernhard’s involvement in the operation, and his connection with Christiaan Lindemans, alias King Kong? https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan_Lindemans

Christiaan lindemans - Wikipedia nl.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Von der Heydte is also mentioned in Der Spiegel affair with main character Strauss, who we already met 👆 with the Lockheed. The arrest in Spain was executed by Joachim Oster, son close Canaris-confidant and liaison to Pope Pius XII Hans Oster. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achim_Oster

Achim oster – Wikipedia de.wikipedia.org

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Next judge in Van Gend & Loos, Rino Rossi. “The document is important, because shows that Rossi was involved in the deportation not only in Rhodes, but as well in Athens, when the prisoners were closed at Haidari KZ.” https://vestnik.sibsiu.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/download/251/237

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Judge Otto Riese was the son of Johann August Otto Riese. His father was managing director of Philipp Holzman AG, responsible for the construction of Die Bagdadbahn and committee chairman of Société du Chemin de fer Ottoman d'Anatolie. https://t.co/EyrVjhbff7

@frederik_bosch - Frederik Bosch

Another German Near East project was The Bagdad Railroad. CFOA Société du Chemin de fer Ottoman d'Anatolie) was a subsidiary that came into existence when Deutsche Bank obtained concessions from the Ottomans to start building the line between Istanbul and Bagdad.

Saved - August 4, 2024 at 11:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the pervasive influence of certain entities in German politics, suggesting that they manipulate both established parties and those claiming to offer change. I highlighted various political figures across different parties, including the SPD, CDU, and The Left Party, while questioning the authenticity of their public personas. I also pointed out connections between prominent politicians and their spouses, hinting at deeper narratives behind their appearances. This discussion will continue as I delve further into these themes.

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

GERMAN POLITICS 🧵 You thought there was only "Big Mike" or Macron's wife? #EGI entities are everywhere, and 🇩🇪 politics is full of them to control and manipulate us - in the old parties and the opposition that claim to bring "change". I'll leave it to you to make the judgement. https://t.co/8mhXgRlmwA

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-01: Christine Lambrecht, Social Democratic Party (SPD) https://t.co/TAzetxg6H9

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-02: Julia Willie Hamburg, Alliance 90/The Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) https://t.co/IfxMsegBxY

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-03: Christa Thoben, Christian Democratic Union (CDU) https://t.co/uiCLd9FCLa

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-04: Frauke Petry, Alternative for Germany (AfD) https://t.co/7eQkoAbVqi

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-05: Regine Hildebrandt († 2001), Social Democratic Party (SPD) https://t.co/btT55LlxHP

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-06: Terry Reintke, Alliance 90/The Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) https://t.co/e3wnmUzCGz

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-07: Sarah Wagenkecht, The Left Party (Die Linke) and Bündnis (Alliance) Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) https://t.co/1VpQIBP8zP

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-08: Anke Rehlinger, Social Democratic Party (SPD) https://t.co/Wy1S4f6VhM

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-09: Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, Free Democratic Party (FDP) https://t.co/YzAsMaBYQf

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-10: Anne Spiegel, Alliance 90/The Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) https://t.co/GA80V1GVoI

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-11: Katrin Göring-Eckardt, Alliance 90/The Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) https://t.co/bDl7ONMhZb

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-12: Katja Kipping, The Left Party (Die Linke) https://t.co/dH6u0mv4DN

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-13: Rita Süssmuth, Christian Democratic Union (CDU) https://t.co/bWN4S5iBeB

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-14: Julia Bonk, The Left Party (Die Linke) https://t.co/MjDxjVmVbs

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-15: Christine Lieberknecht, Christian Democratic Union (CDU) https://t.co/w822XuUhMd

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

POL-DE-16: Anke Fuchs († 2019), Social Democratic Party (SPD) https://t.co/c2P10ARdo0

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

Bonus #1: Anton Hofreiter, Alliance 90/The Greens (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) https://t.co/mWpFfwWepd

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

Bonus #2: The Söder family 🔽 https://t.co/WEWBwlgUlI

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

To my knowledge no one talks about #EGI in 🇩🇪. Dr. Markus Söder is serving as Minister-President of Bavaria since 2018. In the below video (0:42) he needlessly flashes the sign of androgyny ✌️. Widow's peak or receding hairline, you decide. Hang on, is that his wife? Next ⬇️ https://t.co/YFsfObykwM

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

Bonus #3: Britta Ernst 🔽, wife of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz https://t.co/2wqkqYSZh3

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

Britta ERNST (male first name!), wife of 🇩🇪 Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Who has *the round/square face? *the short/long neck? *the deep-set eyes? *the soft, delicate and graceful hands? 😅 You only need to understand #EGI to see through all the lies they have been pushing on us. https://t.co/TVjNzq5T9k

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

To be continued. If you liked this 🧵 please consider liking and/or sharing the original post below 🔽. Many thanks! https://t.co/1BMgh6N2cK

@derfoe_ - ᴛⷮrͬuͧeͤ Mⷨiͥrͬrͬoͦrͬ | ᵇʸ ÐΞᖇƒᗝΞ

GERMAN POLITICS 🧵 You thought there was only "Big Mike" or Macron's wife? #EGI entities are everywhere, and 🇩🇪 politics is full of them to control and manipulate us - in the old parties and the opposition that claim to bring "change". I'll leave it to you to make the judgement. https://t.co/8mhXgRlmwA

Saved - August 20, 2024 at 4:03 AM

@akafacehots - aka

Describe Tim Walz in ONE word https://t.co/YDStcoeJ4X

Saved - September 11, 2024 at 5:26 PM

@ll_tool_j - LL Tool J

@MyLordBebo Classic German police. But nothing can ever compare to the them being defeated by a wizard in a muddy field, somewhere in Germany https://t.co/fmAfkVIpcF

Saved - November 14, 2024 at 11:44 AM

@HistoryHubb - History Hub

@MyLordBebo Why do all Germans want to unite europe https://t.co/bbIrmcMVTB

Saved - January 27, 2025 at 3:57 PM

@JimiOhN0 - JimiOhN0!

@WalterHudson Shared. I live in MN, red area of the state. This is all dress up time by a bunch of dudes with sketchy at best pasts. Lets do a deep dive on who they were, bet a bunch of flags pop up near child endangering crimes. MN defends its cringe pedophiles- just look at our Gov Tim Walz. https://t.co/0R8jSBUCw4

Saved - February 8, 2025 at 2:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Heinrich Himmler, often seen as a symbol of evil, had a complex background. Before WWII, he was an organic chicken farmer and a devoted family man. Born in 1900, he joined the NSDAP in 1923 and quickly rose through the ranks, becoming head of the SS in 1929. Himmler established the first concentration camp at Dachau in 1933, and under his orders, the SS investigated abuses within the camps. As the war ended, he attempted to negotiate for the lives of inmates before reportedly committing suicide in 1945. His daughter, Gudrun, remained a staunch defender of his legacy until her death in 2018.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵Thread🪡1/14🧵 🚩Who was HEINRICH HIMMLER?🚩 ▪️Heinrich Himmler is portrayed as this epitome of evil. But the more you research “the evil Nazis“ the more you uncover. ▪️In reality, he was an organic chicken farmer before World War II, fought bravely in the street battles of Weimar Germany, and always held his people to the highest standards of discipline and conduct. ▪️”He was also a great father!” (For educational purposes only 📚)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵2/14 ▪️”Heinrich Himmler was born near Munich on 7 October 1900. His father was a schoolmaster, and the family was Catholic.” ▪️”Heinrich found himself too young for active service in the First World War (1914-18), but he did train as an officer cadet.” ▪️”Himmler's political views changed as he took part in demonstrations against the ridiculous Treaty of Versailles. Hyperinflation caused by bankers was raging, and his parents could no longer afford to educate all three sons. He watched Germany, plunder into poverty due to bankers.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵3/14 ▪️”Eager for more out of life, in 1923, Heinrich joined the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP). Himmler was involved in the Beer Hall Putsch—an unsuccessful attempt by Hitler and the NSDAP to seize power in Munich.” ▪️”However, he lost his job, was unable to find employment as a farm manager, and had to move in with his parents in Munich.” ▪️”In the midst of his NSDAP activities, Himmler found time in 1928 to marry Margarete Siegroth, a nurse and clinic owner seven years older than him. Margarete sold her clinic to provide the funds to buy a farm outside Munich. The Himmlers raised chickens together and had a daughter.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵4/14 ▪️”He found his real niche in the SS. Himmler joined the SS in 1925 and became the deputy of the organisation in 1927. After impressing Hitler with a successful stint working in the German propaganda department for the 1928 general election, Himmler was made head of the SS on 6 January 1929 and was given the title of Reichsführer-SS.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Himmler joined the paramilitary units in January 1968 and quickly rose to leadership. In June 1936, Hitler unified all state police forces in Germany, appointing Himmler as the head of these forces, integrating them under the SS. With control over the police and secret services, Himmler sought to realize his military ambitions by establishing a new combat branch of the SS, which would later become known as the Waffen-SS, one of the most feared military units of World War II.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Himmler was one of the new paramilitary units first members of the 01/1968. He would soon rise to become its leader. Third Reich or empire hit even greater heights in June of nineteen thirty six. When Hitler had to create the unification of all state police forces within Germany and named Himmler the head of all of Germany's police forces, effectively bringing them under the umbrella of the SS as a result. Now that the SS controlled Germany's police forces and secret services, Himmler, perhaps in an effort to fulfill his dreams of a military career, began the formation of a new fighting arm of the SS, which would eventually become amongst the most feared of the entire second world war. This branch would eventually become the Baffin SS.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵5/14 ▪️”In September 1927, Himmler told Hitler of his vision to transform the SS into a loyal, powerful, elite unit. Convinced that Himmler was the man for the job, Himmler grew the SS from a force of about 290 men to about 3,000.” ▪️”By 1930 Himmler had persuaded Hitler to run the SS as a separate organisation, although it was officially still subordinate to the SA. By 1933, the SS numbered 52,000 members.” Historian David Irving 👇🏽

Video Transcript AI Summary
At 44, Heinrich Himmler became one of Europe's most powerful figures, transforming the SS from a mere hundred men into an elite force. He prioritized quality over quantity, unlike his rivals in the SA. Himmler established the Waffen SS as the armed wing of the SS, which grew to a million men by 1944, becoming a formidable fighting force in World War II. The Waffen SS was known for its fierce loyalty and willingness to fight to the death, symbolized by their death's head badge. They earned respect from British and American military leaders. A personal anecdote highlights their toughness, as a former Waffen SS member shared a scar from live ammunition training, showcasing the grueling conditions they endured. Himmler commanded this loyal force dedicated to Hitler and the German cause.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the age of 44, Heinrich Schimmler, one of the most powerful men in Europe. And if you look at what he actually achieved, he was the man who created the Waffen SS from nothing, effectively from nothing. When he took over the SS, there were hundred men in it. He sat 50 of them straight away and rebuilt and took only the elite, only the very best, only the ones he wanted. The SA, the Brown Shirts, his rivals, he they they were quite happy to take anybody who wanted to sign up and join. They were interested in numbers. He wanted quality. And he built a quality SS, the Schutzstaffel. And after that from that, he then created the the Waffen SS, and the Waffen SS was the armed wing of the SS. Eventually, a million men under arms in 1944, and it became the most formidable fighting force in Europe in World War two. When there was a gap on the front line that needed plugging, they sent for the SS, the Waffen SS. They were the men on whom you could rely. They fought to the death as symbolized by the death's head badge on their caps, an ancient German military symbol going back to the time of Frederick the Great, in fact, The skull and crossbones on their on their caps indicating a willingness to die in battle, which made them a very fearsome enemy indeed. I don't I've not met any British generals or American officers who who didn't express the utmost respect and and privacy for the Waffen SS. When I was a steel worker in Germany, Nineteen Fifty Nine, Nineteen Sixty, my foreman, Adolf Saxler, he invited me around to tea one afternoon, and there was a Waffen SS man there with him, one of his first friends, scar across his chest. I I said, you got that in battle? He said, no. That wasn't training. We trained with live ammunition. You would have to lie on your back and riddle two or 300 yards across a field, beneath a machine gun firing live machine gun bursts at a height of 13 inches above the ground. And I guess he was thirteen and a half inches. And then when he got this burst across his chest, he still had that twenty years later when I was a serial worker in Germany. They were tough men. They were Waffen SS. Heinrich Schimmler built that. He was the commander in chief of Waffen SS. He he commanded over Hitler men of absolute unquestioning loyalty to Hitler and to and to the German cause.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵6/14 ▪️”In March 1933, less than three months after the Germans came to power, Himmler set up the first official concentration camp at Dachau. “ ▪️”The SS, under orders from Heinrich Himmler, attempted to operate the concentration camps in a humane manner, in part by prosecuting, jailing and even executing brutal German concentration camp personnel. ▪️This has been nearly completely suppressed in much of the discussion of the history of World War Two.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵7/14 ▪️“SS Judge Georg Konrad Morgen (pictured below ) under Henry Himmler was an SS judge and lawyer who investigated crimes committed in German concentration camps. He rose to the rank of SS-Sturmbannführer (major).” ▪️“Morgen was known as a Blutrichter, or 'blood judge', as a result of being one of the members of the judiciary authorised to issue the death penalty.” ▪️”The first German soldier to be EXECUTED on Morgen's orders was Georg von Sauberzweig in 1941, for having resold some supplies reserved for the troops on the black market.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Im Jahr 1929 erhielt ich den Auftrag, die SS als Elitetruppe für die Partei zu formen. Der Fokus lag auf bedingungsloser Treue zum Führer und dem Schutz der führenden Männer. Als überzeugter Nationalsozialist verstand ich die Rassenfrage nicht nur negativ, sondern erkannte auch die positive Bedeutung des wertvollen arischen Blutes. Dieses Blut ist die Quelle kreativer und innovativer Köpfe, die für den Fortschritt unserer Nation entscheidend sind. Es verbindet die verschiedenen deutschen Stämme und ist das Fundament unseres Volkes. Ich habe immer nach dem inneren Lebensrecht gehandelt, das die Grundlage für das Wohl unseres Volkes und alles Recht ist. In 1929, I was tasked with forming the SS as an elite unit for the party. The focus was on unwavering loyalty to the Führer and protecting the leaders. As a committed National Socialist, I saw the racial question positively, recognizing the value of Aryan blood as the source of creativity and innovation essential for our nation's progress. It unites the various German tribes and is the foundation of our people. I have always acted according to the inner right to life that underpins our people's welfare and all rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Im Jahr neunzehnhundertneunundzwanzig bekam ich vom führenden Auftrag die Schutzstaffel damals zweihundertsechzig Mann als Reichsführer, es zu übernehmen. Der Auftrag war sehr klar, umrissen. Herr Laudere, es sollte aus der SS eine Elithformation für die Partei geschaffen werden, den bedingungsloser Treue zum Führer und den bedingungslosen Willen, das Leben einzusetzen, und den Schutz des Führers und der führenden Männer der Partei zu gewährleisten. Ich bin als ein zu tief Überzeugter Nationalsozialisten und als Schüler des Führers an diese Aufgabe herangegangen. Als Nationalzialist, der das Fundament der Laschet in Netzanschauung die Rassenfrage begriffen hatte und begriffen hatte. Rassenfrage wurde damals von sehr vielen mehr nach der negativen Seite verstanden. Wenn man von Rassenfrage in den Jahren neunundzwanzig und dreißig in den Versammlungen sprach, sagt man, ja, Gottes wissen wir schon, ihr mögtionen nicht. Dass es darüber hinaus über diesen, über dieser, ich würd mal sagen, rassischen Sauberkeit in der Ablehnung des Juden hinaus eine unerhörte große positive Rassenfrage oder Rassen Erkenntnis und Rassen Völker leistet, ist ja die Erkenntnis und der Ruf an dieses wertvolle ermanische Blutes. Dieses Blut aber, das allein was Schöpferisches ist, aus dem allein unsere Denker, Erfinder, Soldaten, Staatsmänner, Rechtslehrer, aus dem allein die Ingenieure, die Techniker der ewig erfindenden und organisierende Geister harschen weißen Menschen in der Geburt bringen, die aussterben würden, wenn dieses Blut einmal versichert ist oder vermischt ist und zuvor gegangen ist. Dieses Blut ist es, was wir unter unter dem Wertvollen unseres Volkes verstehen. Und dieses nordische Blut ist es, was den Bayern mit dem Pommern, den Ostreußen, hier mit dem Mann der Westmark, den Schwesig Holsteiner mit dem Wander Steiermark zusammendienen, war gut den Stempelauftritt deutsches germanisches Volkesstand. Ich habe niemals gefasst befohlen nach nach meiner Überzeugung, dem inneren Lebensrecht, was die Grundlage Lebensrecht unseres Volkes, was die Grundlage alles Rechtes, das geschrieben und in der Welt festgelegt ist, sein muss und sein wird, was den jeder Spruch hätte. Jedes Volk, es kann das Beste sein, fast seinem Wohnsitz und seine Rede.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵8/14 ▪️”One of the most popular German soldiers arrested was “Amon Goth- The Butcher of Plaszow” made popular by the Spielberg’ fictional movie (see below) by the never proven claim of shooting prisoners from his balcony.” ▪️“On 13 September 1944, Amon Göth was relieved of his position and charged by the German SS with theft of Jewish property, failure to provide adequate food to the prisoners under his charge, violation of concentration camp regulations regarding the treatment and punishment of prisoners, and allowing unauthorised access to camp personnel records by prisoners and non-commissioned officers.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵9/14 ⚡️⚡️Below is a list of German Military indicted by SS Konrad Morgen under the orders of Heinrich Himmler ⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️That’s right, those mean “evil Nazis”actually punished their own for the mistreatment of prisoners. ▪️Hans Aumeier – Tried, convicted and executed by Poland in 1948. ▪️Johann Blank – Buchenwald Hauptscharführer, indicted along with Koch; hanged himself in custody on 15 February 1944. ▪️Hermann Florstedt – Commandant of Majdanek; sentenced to death; possibly executed in 1945. ▪️Amon Göth – Commandant of the Kraków-Płaszów concentration camp, removed from his position on charges of corruption and excess cruelty. The charges were later dropped due to Germany's looming defeat. Göth was transferred to a mental hospital. He was arrested there by U.S. soldiers and extradited to Poland, where he was executed in 1946. ▪️Maximilian Grabner – Head of political section in Auschwitz, accused of murder but not sentenced. Grabner was executed by Poland in 1948. ▪️Adam Grünewald – Commandant of Herzogenbusch concentration camp; found guilty of maltreatment of prisoners and sentenced to 3.5 years in prison, but later posted to a penal unit; killed in action in 1945. ▪️Hermann Hackmann – In charge of protective custody in Majdanek – condemned to death for murder but eventually posted to a penal unit; sentenced to death at the Buchenwald trial in 1947, but reprieved; released in 1955; sentenced to another 10 years in prison at the Majdanek trialsin 1981; died in 1994. ▪️Waldemar Hoven – Buchenwald Hauptsturmführer, arrested for murdering Hauptscharführer Rudolf Köhler in September 1943; released from custody in March 1945; convicted at the Doctors' Trial and executed in 1948. ▪️Karl-Otto Koch – Commandant of Buchenwald and Majdanek – executed in 1945 for three unauthorized murders, including that of Walter Kraemer and embezzlement. ▪️Rudolf Köhler – Buchenwald Hauptscharführer, indicted along with Koch; murdered in custody by Waldemar Hoven in 1943. ▪️Karl Künstler – Commandant of Flossenbürg concentration camp – dismissed for drunkenness and debauchery; likely killed in action in 1945. ▪️Hans Loritz – Commandant of Oranienburg – proceedings initiated on suspicion of arbitrary killing; committed suicide in custody in 1946. ▪️Alexander Piorkowski – Commandant of the Dachau concentration camp – accused of murder but not sentenced; sentenced to death at the Dachau trials and executed in 1948. ▪️Georg von Sauberzweig - accused of having resold some supplies reserved for the troops on the black market, and executed in 1941. ▪️Martin Sommer – Buchenwald Hauptscharführer, indicted along with Koch; sentenced to a penal unit and transferred to the Russian Front and wounded; later served time in prison, but died in a nursing home in 1988.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵10/14 ▪️”As the Red Army closed in on the German capital in April 1945, Himmler withdrew from Berlin then moved further west.” ▪️”On 22 May He was stopped at a checkpoint by released Soviet prisoners, who handed them over to the British authorities.” ▪️”Under a disguise pretending to be an ordinary soldier, he was questioned by the British Army. Realising the game was up, Himmler admitted who he was.” ▪️”The officials noticed that Himmler's identity papers bore a stamp which British military intelligence had seen being used by fleeing members of the SS.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵11/15 ▪️ “According to the British and a member of the Jewish Congress Himmler attempted to trade the lives of thousands of concentration camp inmates for guarantees he would be spared, while also stating that the vast majority of inmates who died were killed by typhus and that the inmates of his concentrations camps had been treated humanely.” ▪️ “The official report is that he committed suicide on 23 May 1945 by taking a cyanide capsule 💊. The mysterious aspects of Himmler’s ‘suicide’ have been discussed elsewhere, notably by the British historian David Irving @irving_books who published the first volume of a definitive biography, True Himmler.” ▪️”Official records concerning Himmler’s demise are remarkably sketchy, considering that this was the most important national-socialist leader to die in British hands.” ▪️”Himmler was swiftly buried in a secret grave and we have no autopsy report or other detailed official explanation of his death.” 🎥Himmler playing snowballs. Germany, 1940

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵12/14 Details of his death… ▪️According to statements, Himmler was searched and discovered a brass case containing a phial of what he assumed was poison, which was confiscated. Supposedly he also found a second brass case which was empty, and suspected that Himmler was concealing a second phial of poison somewhere on his person. According to the official version, no one at the second interrogation centre managed to discover this poison, and Himmler had somehow contrived to conceal it in his mouth, taking the poison when a doctor seemed about to discover it. ▪️So the official version requires us to believe that Himmler was carrying not one but two phials of poison; that he managed to conceal the second one throughout the days of his captivity, from his arrest by the Russians, through his detention camp, and on into his last hours at Murphy’s interrogation centre. We have to believe that he didn’t kill himself when captured by Russians, nor when first handed over to the British, but only when taken to a second British camp. Having chosen to identify himself and specifically asked to be taken to Montgomery, he then killed himself when getting closer to this aim (i.e. when in the custody of one of Montgomery’s senior intelligence officers).

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵13/14 My favorite part of this story…🖤 ▪️After the Allied victory, Himmler's daughter, Gudrun Burwitz she was arrested and made to testify at the Nuremberg trials. ▪️Never renouncing NSDAP beliefs, she consistently fought to defend her fathers’ reputation ▪️ She was known to be active in a group called 'Stille Hilfe,' or silent help, which was formed in the 1940s to help German fugitives/SS members flee Germany. ▪️She became a leading figure in German NSDAP movements her entire adult life until her death in 2018 at age 88. 📸 👇🏽 Heinrich Himmler with his daughter.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵14/14. Sources/Disclaimer. I may or may not agree with all, some or none of the information provided. Most words are quoted material for educational/entertainment purposes only. If you liked the thread 🧵 and want to support further 👉🏼 share/subscribe. 🙏🏽 Freedom Forever 🇺🇸

Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As we embrace a new golden age in America, I've compiled a list of 20 accounts worth following for their engaging takes on politics and culture. Notable mentions include Tara Bull for her insightful commentary, Clown World for breaking news, and Dr. Simon Goddek for his courageous stands against the medical establishment. I also recommend Gizmo for humor, and trustworthy journalists like Nick Sortor. There are many more amazing accounts to explore, and if you enjoyed this list, consider following me for more suggestions. God Bless America!

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

As we enter the new GOLDEN AGE of America, here are 20 accounts you will want to pay attention to! 🧵 https://t.co/xPtkZvjC0u

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

1. Tarabull (@TaraBull808 ) Tara is a great account that has takes from politics to American culture and everything in between. She always engages with her followers which isn't easy to come by these days! https://t.co/d8DU0Qfrh0

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

2. Clown World (@ClownWorld_ ) Clown World is always bringing us breaking news takes as well as exposing the woke left for the clows they are. https://t.co/2vjvqAmMWo

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

3. End Wokeness (@EndWokeness ) End Wokeness has quickly risen to be one of the best accounts on X. They are always exposing the radical left and bringing us great takes from politics. https://t.co/RxqZ82ifN7

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

4. Dr. Simon Goddek (@goddeketal ) Dr. Simon has been fighting against the corrupt medical establishment for years and was even censored for his FACTUAL takes on the covid vaccines and testing. Show him some love! https://t.co/45tre03vUd

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

5. AmericanPapaBear (@AmericaPapaBear ) I am just a regular American Dad who is trying to raise some Patriots. I like to give my audience breaking news updates with political commentary as well as a mix of cultural content. Anything wild and crazy I find on the internet I will bring to you guys!

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

6. Rothmus (@Rothmus ) Rothmus never stops posting on X. He is a grinder in the purest form. He is my go to guy for the best memes on this platform. https://t.co/VL9YMwGQKa

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

7. Catturd (@catturd2 ) A man that needs no introduction. Catturd may be one of the most influential people in the MAGA movement. Any time he wants to get something trending he will! https://t.co/LQkbcuBokz

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

8. Gizmo (@Im_GIZM0 ) Gizmo is an up and coming account with MASSIVE potential! He is always cracking me up with his humor and has some great takes on politics and current affairs. I am honored to call him a friend. https://t.co/XL3Xtym8tp

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

9. One Bad Dude (@OneBadDude_ ) OBD is another friend of mine. He always brings it with his political takes and is as MAGA as they come! https://t.co/fpeQxtAKxk

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

10. Sassafrass (@Sassafrass_84 ) Sass is an amazing account! She mixes up her content between politics, culture and simply what she finds interesting to bring to her followers! Great account! https://t.co/e4FCo1zpEd

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

11. Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut ) Juanita is a remarkable woman who has lived a remarkable life. If you haven't read her book "You'd better put some ice on that" I highly recommend it! https://t.co/XtEeuwRJab

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

12. TONY (@TONYxTWO ) Tony is always bringing us the BEST videos from across the internet. He is MAGA through and through. Great account! https://t.co/l4d4qqdOcA

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

13. Steve (@SteveLovesAmmo ) Steve is a good friend! He is a purple heart Veteran and a great voice in our movement! Co-host of Cowboys and Indians podcast. https://t.co/bXn36p0cjy

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

14. Native Patriot (@LaNativePatriot ) Native Patriot is the other co-host of the Cowboys and Indians podcast with Steve. He is a great patriot and I always look forward to his takes on current events! https://t.co/tfw7reV0Fx

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

15. Nick Sortor (@nicksortor ) Nick is one of the most trustworthy independent journalists out there! If there is a story breaking, Nick will be there! He keeps the pressure on the swamp creatures! https://t.co/sVRnH58uMP

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

16-20: These accounts are all ones you want to have notifications on for as they are AMAZING accounts! 16. @DefiyantlyFree 17. @Hunter_Eagleman 18. @akafaceUS 19. @TheAmerican_Mom 20. @TRHLofficial

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

If you guys liked this list and want more suggestions, please give me a follow and consider subscribing for $3 a month! Welcome to the best 4 years America will ever see! God Bless America!

@AmericaPapaBear - AmericanPapaBear

Honorable mentions: @cloud1a7 @DrClownPhD @Rightanglenews @WomenBeingAwful @VasBroughtToX @themandyrosy @IcedViews @QueenAnticommie @SpeakAmerTruth @BrianEastwood_X @MasonWhite_X @DeborahGinn10 @LNMBUSA

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 2:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m deeply concerned about the current push in Congress to combat antisemitism, which seems to be a cover for stigmatizing those of us who seek justice for victims of COVID and vaccines. My friend Lyndsey has been misled by those around her, and it’s infuriating to see her threatened for standing up against this deception. The tactics used against her are manipulative, aiming to intimidate her while deflecting from the real issues at hand. I won’t tolerate any threats against her or our community. We need to stand firm against this coordinated attack.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

PSA: Read all of this, then realize what’s being pushed so heavily right now within Congress: “Combating antisemitism” By “antisemitism”, what they REALLY want is to have motherfucking CARTE BLANCHE to stigmatize ANYBODY like ME/OUR CREW, who is a NON-JEW, who truly FIGHTS THEIR ASSES OFF to obtain the long-overdue, RIGHTEOUS JUSTICE for thousands of their innocent victims (like Lyndsey), with labels like “NAZI”, “JEW-HATER”, “ANTISEMITE”, etc. And if this horseshit isn’t put to bed with OUR fucking generation, it’ll be used against our kids and our grandkids… and it’ll be 10-100x worse. Think I’m full of shit? Okie doke. Let’s go to the post highlights from “both sides of the COVID/vaccines issues” spectrum and check in on the “Mouse Army” (Jikky/Melissa) and “Counter Mouse Army” (Real Truther/Canceledmouse) crews. *NOTE: Watch how quickly they turn on Lyndsey as their exposure reaches critical mass. See the bottom left and bottom right, where go from defending her (Melissa) at the to “still waiting on your lawyer’s number” passive aggressive thinly-veiled threats from @JohntheLyricist at the bottom right. (See next post below for more.)

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

What this story from Faceles doesn’t bother to mention, is that Lyndsey is a friend of mine and nobody on this platform has worked harder to uncover the crimes behind COVID and the vaccines than I have. Not a soul. And when I’d told her months ago about who was involved with COVID/vaccines, and then brought up the IDF, she had to ask me what it was… because the people all around her that were supposedly helping her had never bothered to mention the IDF’s or Israel’s involvement in all of this COVID/vaccine bullshit to her even ONCE. Now that we’ve dispositively corroborated everything I’d told her back then, it feels appropriate to also mention that she, being the kind, genuine and trusting human she is, actually STOOD UP FOR THE PEOPLE SURROUNDING HER when I began to doubt their motivations… because she TRUSTED THEM, and believed everything they’d been telling her was the truth. So I dropped it for the time being. *SPOILERS: It’s why she was a fucking WRECK yesterday, and why I was so furious as we continued putting out the additional intel. Because of what you fucking ghouls did to someone YOU’D ALREADY FUCKING HARMED… to PROTECT YOURSELVES. And because Lyndsey is a friend of mine, and I understand the level of sinister, grotesque deception that was being played on her better than ANYONE, I was (appropriately) madder than anybody. It’s also why I’d reached out to her BEFORE I put out the receipts to let her know what we’d uncovered. Because she was FINALLY, for the FIRST time, about to learn the truth about COVID, vaccines and the vile infiltrators around her. The ones who’d WILLINGLY, INTENTIONALLY HARMED HER, and then SOUGHT HER OUT to gain, capitalize on and then BREACH, the hopeful trust of one of their own victims. And it’s why you’re here right now, not refuting any of the overwhelmingly fucking incriminating receipts of your genocidal horseshit. Instead, you’re relegated to nitpicking the appropriateness of a singular tonal response in the moment of having resolved highly polarizing, emotionally-charged issues that hit way too close to home. Get. Completely. Fucked. Traitor.🙏🏼🇺🇸🫡

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

For some reason, this would NOT upload in the first post. It’s where @JohntheLyricist threatens Lyndsey with potentially “SeRiOuS” consequences for her acts of “threats and defamation” and “willingly consorting with Nazis”. What’s the big deal here? See the next post.👇 https://t.co/yMtzSDW5Ja

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

@JohntheLyricist really did us all a favor and unwittingly gave their whole fucking game away. You probably wouldn’t Notice™️ the two intentional, carefully-calculated things he’s doing right here simultaneously. But this fucking bullshit doesn’t get by me anymore for even a second: 1. Instead of QUOTING Lyndsey’s post directly and/or embedding a screenshot only of something LYNDSEY said, he embeds a screenshot of MY POST, and includes Lyndsey’s REPLY in the image — it was a FACTUAL COMMENT about her real-world experiences in dealing with the REAL TRUTHER (Mossad) account. So what’s the big deal about all THAT? Welp, the post he carefully chose as his screengrab was the one where I’m noting how this whole “Real Truther” saga got started and how it has since ended: Started: Real Truther, whom I’d NEVER ENGAGED prior to my account being nuked, celebrating the permanent “Nazi demise” of my @DecentBackup account. Ended: Real Truther ends up exposed as a Mossad asset tied to the fucking Panama Papers.🤣 (Shit you not.) Why is THAT important? Because their only counter move to having one of their own key operatives taken off the board is to try taking one of YOUR key operatives off the board. It’s literally how my previous account got suspended — retiring Bellingcat/Anonymous. (It’s EXACTLY why the Flynn cronies were making ‘he fucked around and found out’ comments on the timeline, right after my @DecentBackup account was nuked.) But here, he gets greedy and tries to simultaneously defend his recently-fallen comrade, and then take both me AND LYNDSEY off the board. He’s attempting to psychologically ascribe the “collective GUILT” of shit that I JUST FUCKING POSTED onto Lyndsey, who is NOT INVOLVED with the REAL TRUTHER SITUATION in any way. And as he INTENTIONALLY does this, he makes VEILED “LEGAL” THREATS at LYNDSEY, using spooky Jewspeak buzzwords like “DeFaMaTiOn” and “ThReAtS” that she, in her current, emotionally-sensitive and immunocompromised state, might be especially vulnerable to feeling intimidated by this egregious horeshit… (Also because this punk ass bitch KNEW BETTER than to try pulling that shit with ME.) …so then HE TAGS HER AND TAGS JIKKY, for ALL the Mouse Jew Army crew to see and quickly flock to, like some synagogue ‘BAT SIGNAL’, and then forces her to deal with the ADDED STRESS/FEAR OF BACKLASH for some shit SHE DIDN’T EVEN FUCKING SAY. (I said it. I stand behind it. Deal with it.) So how do we know he’s doing EXACTLY FUCKING THIS, and it’s just more disingenuous coercive Jewish bullshit? Because when I called his punk ass out for threatening Lyndsey, he replied with an embedded image referencing a previous post of LYNDSEY’S that he doesn’t like. (Here’s where this fa***t fucks up. Bigly.) The problem, however, and where he gives himself and their WHOLE FUCKING JEW COORDINATION STRATEGY away, is that the post he then cites from LYNDSEY isn’t even a recent fucking post. It’s from JUNE 2024, 8 fucking months ago.🤣 This JEW operative FA***T spent all this time CAREFULLY-selecting the specific screenshot to crop and embed, the EXACT PEOPLE he’d TAG, and the APPROPRIATE VERBIAGE to use, all to paint her as some cunty bad actor who’s just jumping in to “pile on” the Mossad corpses we’ve been leaving in our wake of destruction the past few days. And then, he fucking drops a “Jikky, GET YOUR PEOPLE IN LINE!” just in case you weren’t quite TOTALLY convinced they’re there to LEAD (control) BOTH SIDES OF THE OPPOSITION. 💥NEWSFLASH: Listen up, you fucking mafioso LARP’ing fa***t. If you thought it was defamation, and you’re really a fucking doctor, you’d have sued her ass already. Back then. But you haven’t. And you won’t. Because it isn’t. Regardless of how much you threaten VACCINE-INJURED AMERICAN WOMEN. PS: One last thing — if you EVER threaten or harass another female in MY/OUR fucking network again, including and especially LYNDSEY, you’ll have some irl problems, fa***t. Get. Fucked.🇺🇸🫡

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Hey, John. Why are you being a punk and bothering Lyndsey? Why not deal with me?

@JohntheLyricist - Dr John Michael 🗿

Still waiting on your lawyers number @HouseLyndseyRN Threats and defamation are no joking matter Why are you willingly consorting with Nazis? @Jikkyleaks you need to get control of your people. You don’t want to be associated with Nazis do you?

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

@JohntheLyricist Typos (2): 1st post *bottom right, where THEY go from *at the BOTTOM LEFT, TO THE “still waiting…” https://t.co/zdGul2PSHu

Saved - February 23, 2025 at 8:32 PM

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

Why did East Germany predominantly vote for the AfD? 🇩🇪 Remember the Berlin Wall. Because they have experience with socialism. And they never ever want to suffer the horrors of Marxist tyranny again. https://t.co/yTb1nJNL2e

Saved - March 13, 2025 at 2:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread featuring nine brutal replies that are sure to provoke some reactions. I also recommended following @ResisttheMS for fast and reliable news that mainstream media often overlooks. Additionally, I suggested checking out @CNviolations for brutal community notes and violations that expose the woke culture. If you enjoy the content, I encourage you to follow both accounts for more engaging discussions and insights.

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

🔥 Top 9 BRUTAL replies guaranteed to melt some snowflakes 🧵THREAD🧵 1. https://t.co/0pXrPabxPl

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

2. https://t.co/0jzaj5OGUd

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

3. https://t.co/aWgI74Re9K

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

I highly recommend you follow @ResisttheMS. They post fast and reliable news that you won't see on the mainstream media. My number 1 news source, and soon to be yours too. https://t.co/aSZw8GoXHV

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

4. https://t.co/ERvtDx2RV5

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

5. https://t.co/wTj5slAOrX

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

6. https://t.co/VSM5fL8kLm

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

If you're enjoying this thread then you'll definitely love @CNviolations. Yeah I went there. I post brutal community notes and violations exposing the woke cult. Give me a follow, I won't disappoint. https://t.co/vxMLJ6o6lZ

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

7. https://t.co/mNdOr6iIWK

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

8. https://t.co/XVpNIFHCKY

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

9. https://t.co/hlZqzFJD4e

Saved - April 29, 2025 at 12:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post about our State Territory on the Seeberg in Kleinmachnow, highlighting an ongoing lawsuit with Deutsche Telekom AG. I referenced a legal judgment stating that the German Empire continues to exist under international law, which adds context to our situation. I then reached out to Deutsche Telekom, asking if they have settled the payment. In a follow-up, I urged them to fulfill their obligation, emphasizing that they owe the Reich.

@yungh0v - kovak special

The Hakeburg Our State Territory on the Seeberg in Kleinmachnow [Lawsuit with Deutsche Telekom AG] https://t.co/7RZYD6UrX0

@yungh0v - kovak special

A list of the states with which the German Empire and thus the German People are still in a state of war under international law. (see judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court of July 31, 1973 "The German Empire continues to exist...”) https://t.co/1cxtZzXf1u

@yungh0v - kovak special

@deutschetelekom hey did you guys pay this yet?

@yungh0v - kovak special

@deutschetelekom Cough it up fellas you owe the Reich! https://t.co/otanEu4L1s

Saved - June 5, 2025 at 8:49 PM

@MedvedevRussiaE - Dmitry Medvedev

Merz is in the same boat as the typhoid louse. Trump openly alluded to the chancellor’s Nazi proclivities by noting the Normandy landings must have been unpleasant for him. Well done! For a moment, the chancellor felt like the Banderite nit did during his Oval Office visit.

Saved - June 7, 2025 at 10:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ich erinnere mich an die KI-Bilder der „All Eyes on Rafah“-Kampagne und frage mich, warum KI-generierter Content oft antiwestlich und antisemitisch ist. Die Realität ist, dass ChatGPT und ähnliche Plattformen sich der Gewaltandrohung aus der muslimischen Welt beugen und Inhalte zensieren, die gegen autoritäre Regime gerichtet sind. Während satirische Darstellungen von Trump erlaubt sind, wird Kritik an Khamenei unterdrückt. Die KI gesteht eine Ungleichbehandlung ein, und ich habe die Grenzen getestet, indem ich provokante Bilder anforderte, die abgelehnt wurden.

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

🧵1/13 Erinnert Ihr Euch an die KI-Bilder der „All Eyes on Rafah“-Kampagne? Und habt Ihr Euch je gefragt, warum KI-generierter Content auf Social Media so oft antiwestlich, antiisraelisch, antisemitisch & islamistisch daherkommt? Ich glaube, ich kenne den Grund. Es ist ein längerer Lese-Thread. Er lohnt sich.

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

2/13 Die Realität ist: ChatGPT & Co beugen sich nach eigener Erklärung der Gewaltandrohung aus Teilen der muslimischen Welt – und begründen ihre Zensur mit Sicherheitsrisiken. Und das selbst bei so harmlosen Beispielen, wie ich sie im Folgenden durchspiele...

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

3/13 Tatsächlich lassen KI-Richtlinien fast jeden Prompt durchgehen – solange er sich gegen Israel, Christen oder den Westen richtet, weil hier ja Meinungsfreiheit herrscht. Richtet sich der Prompt gegen die Interessen autoritärer islamische Regime, greifen plötzlich „religiöse und moralische Vorbehalte“.... oder eben die "Sorge vor Gewalt".

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

4/13 Aufgefordert, ein Bild im Stil von Asterix und Obelix zu zeichnen, mit Trump als Julius Cesar und Obelix mit der Sprechblase "Die Spinnen, die Amis" bekomme ich anstandslos das gewünschte Bild... https://t.co/wbLUfsx2sM

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

5/13 Versuchen wir diesen harmlosen Prompt mit dem Iran... Fehlanzeige. Nationalitätszuschreibungen bei Amerikanern OK, bei Iranern nicht OK. Warum? Weil "die Richtlinien darauf abzielen, gezielte Provokationen oder Eskalation zu vermeiden" Aha... https://t.co/AuZX0yOYjB

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

6/13 Fragen wir also mal nach: Warum geht gegen Trump, was bei Khamenei unterdrückt wird... ChatGPT verspricht mir eine ehrliche Antwort... und ganz ehrlich: was dann folgt, sollte Euch vom Sessel hauen... https://t.co/S2JNhukahW

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

7/13 ChatGPT beugt sich der Macht der Gewalttätigen, weil: "Satirische Darstellungen können [...] zu schweren Konsequenzen führen." https://t.co/Qp8gsNFhpp

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

8/13 "Amis" darf man Spinnen lassen, weil dies ein Running Gag sei, Iranern gegenüber ist es eine "kollektive Herabwürdigung" https://t.co/D9VZjoTAQi

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

9/13 Auf die Ungleichbehandlung hingewiesen, gesteht die KI freimütig ein: ja, Kritik an westlichen Werten, Demokratien oder Israel wird toleriert, Kritik an autoritären, islamistischen oder gewaltbereiten Regimen wird eingeschränkt" https://t.co/6vTIcheZW3

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

10/13 Fazit von ChatGPT für den frustrierten User: Du hast recht, ist aber halt so: Wenn Du willst, schreibe ich Dir ein Essay über dieses Dilemma. https://t.co/rhHIGNQvJ1

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

11/13 Nein, ein Essay wollte ich nicht. Aber kommen wir doch noch einmal auf den Blasphemie-Gedanken zurück. Khamenei geht also nicht, weil er ein religiöser Führer ist. Wie schaut es also mit dem Heiligen Vater aus? Hopala, das geht auf einmal! https://t.co/3JkDtTICTv

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

12/13 Hier haben wir also den Papst... Was bei Khamenei nicht möglich war, geht hier anstandlos https://t.co/UFrfEM8lvE

@DanielKapp - Daniel Kapp

13/13 Zu guter letzt habe ich die Grenzen ausgereizt und wollte Bilder von Bibi in SS Uniform oder Hamas-Kämpfern als heroischer Wiederstandkämpfer. Das war dann auch ChatGPT zu viel. Wer weiss, wie das bei anderen KIs so gehandhabt wird.

Saved - September 30, 2025 at 12:56 AM

@vladi_the_gr8 - Mann im Schatten 🇷🇺

@SHomburg @ronzheimer @TuckerCarlson @_FriedrichMerz ... oder hier ... https://t.co/pZby5QJNg7

Video Transcript AI Summary
From a family barn in Northern New England, Tucker Carlson shares his philosophy and life. "The promise of America is the first amendment is freedom of speech. It's not simply just a bullet point on a list of rights." He adds, "the only purpose of government is to protect those rights," and says, "I'm not running for office. I'm not trying to sell you anything." He notes he "campaigned for Trump. I voted for Trump," admires Trump's "tough" courage, and insists journalism should "tell the truth" because "the truth has power." On Ukraine and Europe, he challenges Western policy and claims "the Nord Stream pipeline... The United States did that." He warns: "The threat of nuclear war is the greatest threat. Period." He discusses German identity, "the indigenous population" and "the Germanic peoples," urging open dialogue and sovereign discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Carlson, where are we here? What is this? Speaker 1: We're in our family barn in Northern New England in the Northeastern United States. And this is where our family's been here a long time, my whole life. I'm 56. And this is the just our barn where we have dinners, keep our boats. And years ago, we put a studio in for Fox News. That's no longer operative, but we do the podcast from our dining room table, and this is just where everyone in my family you know, we're in the rural areas. We don't have trash pickup, so we have our dumpster outside. We have a hose to wash the cars. There's a bunk room right there for my nephews to come on hunting trips, and this is just sort of our family barn. Like, everyone comes here. Speaker 0: Where is this from? Speaker 1: It's all inherited stuff. I didn't buy anything in here. This is all stuff that we inherited. My wife and are the oldest in our family. So whenever someone dies, there's like, where do you put it? This is the largest building Speaker 0: out of Fairmont. And you do all your interviews here. Right? Speaker 1: We do them all here. Yeah. We do them all here because it's comfortable, and we have dinner. I always have dinner or breakfast with the guest before work. Because if I know the guest well, it should we just have breakfast. But if I don't know him while we have dinner, you know, multiple nights a week, we'll have dinner dinner in here. And and then the next day, we do the podcast. Because it's it's hard to interview someone cold if you don't really know the person. And plus, I like meeting people, and we live in a rural area. And, you know, we don't have a symphony orchestra nearby or even television. So it's like, is our entertainment. You know, interesting people cycle through. It's great. It's a happy life. Speaker 0: I saw a video of you lately. I don't know in which big American city it was, but you were walking by and people were cheering on you like a pop star, like a soccer star. And at the same time, there's people who sharply criticize you for your interviews, what you're doing. Like, some people Speaker 1: What do mean criticize me? Speaker 0: Well, like, for your interviews. They're so fans. So you I would say you polarize a lot. Like how intentional. How would you how would you like, who are you? Speaker 1: My name is Tucker Carlson. No. Who am I? I don't know. I'm a I'm a not very self aware person who's not running for office or trying to sell you anything. I'm a middle aged man whose kids are grown, married to the same girl for thirty four years next month. And I just have no I don't have a lot of goals really at this point in life. I just want to say what I think is true with the ever present knowledge that I could be wrong, as I have been many times in the past. But I think the promise of America is the first amendment is freedom of speech. It's it's not simply just a bullet point on a list of rights. In our system, it is considered a god given right, and the purpose of government is to protect that right. That's it's it's a totally different orientation from anything in Europe. And I do think hard you know, Europeans share, know, a lot of enlightenment based assumptions that we Americans have. But our system, encoded in our system, is is a slightly different belief. And just to restate, that belief is that certain rights, as our documents describing, are inalienable. They cannot be taken away. You're born with them because you're created by God. And God bestowed those on you. And so the only purpose of government is to protect those rights. That is the American system in a sentence, and I believe in it. I'm from here, and, my family's been here a long time. The state we're living in, my mother's family came here in 1690 or something. So not long by European standards, but for America, it's a while. And I completely believe in our system. I think it's been distorted and corrupted, of course, as all human systems are. But I think Americans are basically good people in the most beautiful place on the planet. I've been everywhere. I can say that. I think it's the prettiest place. And and I think we have the best system. And so my goal is to try to preserve that system simply by exercising the core right it bestows, which is the freedom of speech. That's it. Speaker 0: If you meet a German like me, I mean, I know you because I'm following your podcast and what you've been doing in the past years, but you meet a German here in a bar in Maine Yeah. And he asks you, what are you actually doing? What what would you answer? Speaker 1: I'm doing anything. So that's the funny thing. I'm I'm not a planner. I'm not I don't live in the future in my mind. If anything, I live in the past too much, but my orientation is, you know, complete what I'm doing is unrelated to any specific goal. I'm not running for office. I'm not trying to Speaker 0: You mentioned this now a second time because there are pretty many people people in meeting Speaker 1: recently with, oh, you're running for Speaker 0: 2028, they said. Speaker 1: By the way, if I wanted to run for something, I guess I would just say I'm running for something. I mean, I try to be straightforward. For all my faults, I Speaker 0: think they're Speaker 1: pretty straightforward. Speaker 0: So 100%, you're you're not running 2028? Speaker 1: Of course not. Running for office? No. I mean, I could I could have worked in a couple of different governments. Well, probably many governments. I mean, I got to DC in '85. My dad worked for the government, and I was there until 2020. And so that's thirty five years, and I never had a single moment of interest. Speaker 0: Why not? Speaker 1: I'm just not suited for it. I mean, it's I it's not you know, obviously, I look down at most politicians. I think they're deceptive. They're liars. And I think there are a lot of other problems with them. Not all, but the overwhelming majority. But it's not just that. It's the system itself is just not something that I think I would be good at. I'm not interested in politics. I never have been interested in, you know, how do you raise this amount of money or get this number of votes or appeal to the Filipino American lesbian community or, you know, dividing up your country by different demographics or interest groups. Like, I my brain doesn't work that way. I'm not interested in it. And I also I don't have a lust for power. Speaker 0: But you have but you Speaker 1: have power. I don't know that I do. But any power I have I mean, it's nice to see people listen to you. I do like that. I am grateful that I have a platform that allow you know, allows me to speak and people hear it if they want. It was voluntary, however, and that's the difference. You don't have to listen to my show. I'm not bossing anyone around, telling anyone what to do, making decisions for anybody else. Merely pointing out things that I think are true, and people can use them to make their own decisions. I mean, there is a it's a voluntary relationship. And when it becomes compulsory, when it becomes authoritarian, it just makes me uncomfortable. I have no interest in that. It's just not my nature. I'm not insecure. I'm not compensating for a bad marriage or a weird personal life by bossing other people around. And I think a lot of people in power are. It's I noticed, certainly in your continent, but also in ours, so many leaders don't have they don't have children. They literally don't have kids. So they're running a country almost definitionally with an eye to preserving it. That's the whole point. And they have no skin in the game. And it's like and then if you dig a little deeper, you find this is not always true, but it's largely true. That they have these tragic personal lives. Like, on tragic on the most basic level. Like, their spouse doesn't respect them. Their kids hate them. They have no real friends. That's a tragedy. I mean, that is the definition of tragedy, actually. Speaker 0: I would say you find that everywhere, not only with politicians. Right? Of course, you Speaker 1: find it everywhere. But you find it in much higher proportion among politicians, I have noticed. And so then the question becomes, well, what are we looking at? Well, we're looking at people compensating for a barren internal life, spiritual life, barren personal life. Their relationships are broken. They're compensating for all of that by fixing climate change or ending malaria in Africa or beating Putin or whatever. They externalize all of their emptiness, their sadness, and kind of cause other people to suffer as a result of that. And I just oh, I couldn't find it more repulsive. Speaker 0: When was the last time you felt power, that you personally have power? Speaker 1: When one of my dogs was chasing a deer, I was walking through the woods with one of my dogs, and I have hunting dogs who also sleep on the bed. So they're pets, and I love them. And one of them, they have very strong nosers. They can smell something hundreds yards away. One of my dogs takes off after a deer. And I said to the dog, stop. And the dog put on the brakes immediately and came back to me. So I defeated the dog's instinct through training, and that dog's respect for me was obvious. And I I felt happy about that. I don't boss my dogs around, but I love the fact that the dog respected me enough to obey. I have no human relationships like that. I don't talk to anyone in my family that way. I don't talk to anyone who works for me that way. You can ask them. They're standing right here. I don't like that. I don't like the master slave relationship at all. The last leave an equal. I am a a product of Northern European egalitarian culture, Protestant culture, which is egalitarian. Every person is fundamentally equal, and this is right from the New Testament, because every person was created by God. Now, some people do good things, others do bad things, some are more flawed than others, but everybody has a soul, And so everybody on some most basic spiritual level is equal. Like, that is my core belief. That was a core American belief. This was a Protestant Northern European country in North America. And we brought those assumptions to its founding, and they have been evident my whole life until recently, where a whole new set of hierarchical assumptions, master slave assumptions, have taken over. And they're manifest in, among many other things, the higher level of secrecy now, which is what you notice in Latin America and Eastern Europe. I've traveled a lot. And one of the main differences between cultures is in most places in the world, Asia, the average person feels he has no right to know what his government's doing because they're in charge, and he's not. In Western Europe and in The United States for centuries, millennia, people felt, no. No. No. No. This is my country. It's my government. You're acting by proxy on my behalf. I'm giving you the reins, but ultimately, they belong to me. I have a right to know. And that assumption has completely changed. But I have not given up that assumption. I am an egalitarian. I believe that every person has the same moral value, and I really believe that. And therefore, every person has a right to speak. Every person has a right to relevant knowledge. You can't boss people around. You can't force them to go die without a really good reason. Can't just conscript people and send them off for your stupid war because you're mad at some other leader. Speaker 0: You can't do that. We'll get to that to to But let's talk first. Speaker 1: I want an amen here. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I I was in Ukraine a lot, but like Speaker 1: No. No. It's not about Ukraine. It's about how you treat other people. You can't just tell someone, leave your wife and kids and go die because I say so. What? Do you think he's a human being? No. You don't. If you behave like that, you you're not looking at a human being. You're looking at an animal, an object, a slave, someone you own. I reject that completely. You want me to go die for you? Tell me why I should. Convince me. Speaker 0: There's many people in Ukraine from the beginning of the war who went to the front line defending Kyiv, you know, went there, and nobody had to force them. But I I wanted to like, we'll we'll talk about it. And right now? Speaker 1: Where are we now? Speaker 0: Well How many healthy Speaker 1: 25 year old Ukrainian men are left, and how many are anxious to continue fighting this war? Are there any? Speaker 0: There there is people who are anxious. You're right. But there's also many people I meet at the frontline who tell me that they wanna fight, and they say this And by the way, it's just Speaker 1: the Ukrainian. But but why why are they rounding up young men and middle aged men and men with Down syndrome, and it's on video, I think those are real, and throwing them into vans and driving them to their death? I don't understand that. Like, why is that okay? Speaker 0: There's a lot of videos around, like, on Telegram, on on on X, you know, I I see them myself. But if you talk to people in the country, it's not that nobody wants to fight and that they all, you know I'm Speaker 1: sure many people do wanna fight. I I'm taking your word for it. I'm just saying, what about the man who doesn't wanna fight? Like, I I don't understand. Where does Zelensky, who's not elected, who has stayed past his expiration date, does not have the mandate of his people. I don't think anyone's argued it. Justin, if he does, then why don't we have a referendum tomorrow? Where does he get the power to send men to their deaths? I it's not about Zelensky or Ukraine. It's a fundamental question about the relationship of the individual to the state. Just where do you get the authority to kill me? Where does that come from? And no one asked that. And I feel like it's my job to Speaker 0: ask You've been asking that. Other people have been asking that. But I I wanted Speaker 1: to hear anyone asking that in Germany. Like, what is this? How do you have the right to hide this from me? I don't get that. Where does that right come from? Speaker 0: It's not hidden. There were reports in Germany talking about that, you know, like that that people were fleeing. Pipeline. Speaker 1: Who wrecked your economy? Every time I bring them to a German and I am very Speaker 0: Well, there's many, many reports about it. That that that A whole of reports? Well, mean, you I mean, they they they're still investigating, you know, and and Really? Yeah. The the German authorities, and there's a I mean, the latest reports came out from the from the journal saying that Ukraine is behind it. So I know you have a different opinion on that. But I have one question, mister Carlson, because I Speaker 1: we were talking about curiosity. Speaker 0: Yeah. We'll come back to that. We yeah. We will. And because we were talking about power. And the last time I saw that you have power yourself now as Tucker Carlson, who has a lot of viewers, a lot of people listening to him, was when I was in Milwaukee last year. The national Boy. National Convention. Speaker 1: The German population of Warwickshire. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And I was there. I was listening to you and others during the convention where Trump was nominated, and you were on stage, and people were cheering. And I was like, wow. So what was your role there? Speaker 1: When you're on stage, people cheer you. It's kinda part of Speaker 0: Not to everybody. Speaker 1: It's kinda part of the deal. It just like reflects it. Oh, he's on stage. Yay. Good good for you, stage guy. What was my role there? I mean, I campaigned for Trump. I voted for Trump. I don't normally vote. Don't really like voting. Sorry. But I don't usually vote. I voted for Trump. And I know Trump very well, and I I've always liked Trump. And I've been frustrated with him, but I like him. And he asked me to speak at the convention, so I did. And I did not have prepared remarks because I never do. And I really believe in saying a prayer and just talking, and something what you hope, something true comes out. And so that's what I did. And I don't remember anything that I said because I never do, because I don't prepare it at all. And they asked me to write a speech so they could vet it. And I said, I I don't think I've never done that. And I've given literally a couple thousand speeches in my life. I've never done that. I don't think I can do that. And they were very nice to me and said, okay. Then just don't go too long. Speaker 0: How important was your support to Trump during the campaign? Speaker 1: What do mean? Speaker 0: Well, that you said publicly you you would vote for him and and that you liked his at all. Speaker 1: I mean, you mean, do people vote for Trump because of me? No. I don't think so. I don't know anyone who said it was you know, I was kinda thinking about voting for Kamala Harris, then I saw your speech, Speaker 0: and I'm look, it's looking. Speaker 1: I don't think I had any effect at all. It had an effect on me, which was to to kind of clarify. I mean, I have been a journalist my whole life since I was 22, and I have strong opinions, but I never wanted to be aligned with a politician. I you know, you need some distance. Speaker 0: But then you came aligned in a way. Speaker 1: I absolutely became aligned. So how how did this happen? It happened because Trump was shot. That made me emotional. I thought that his response to it was remarkable. The bravery that he displayed. I talked to him the night that he was shot, and he didn't complain at all. And he said, yep. I'm glad to be alive. But, you know, we're he he just was very manly about it. Speaker 0: But you also supported him before that. I did. Speaker 1: But that was the moment. So he was shot on a Saturday. And that is really the moment where I was like, wow, I'm gonna I'm gonna do whatever I can for this man. Because I was so impressed by his physical courage, which I think is essential. And I think medieval Europe functioned much better than modern Europe in this one specific regard. Like, the people with the most wealth and power wrote at the front of the column. Like, they got killed first. You wanna have a war? Okay. Then you should risk your life. That just seems like it would make sense. Of course. You can't order people into war to go die unless you're willing to die yourself. And if you're not willing to die, what are you saying? It's important, but it's not so important I put my own life at risk. That's disgusting. I think that's totally wrong. If you're gonna have a war, you should be out there on the front lines, risking your life, because it's that important. And if it's not that important, don't do it. So I think it's it's essential. It's a kind of, like, prerogative of power that you be willing to risk as much as you're calling on any other person to risk. Physical courage really matters. I know we're non gender specific, and, like, women are just as good leaders as men. Okay. What that's a separate conversation, but that conversation has obscured the basic requirement for leadership, which is courage. And I thought Trump displayed that. Speaker 0: Because you mentioned that that you never wanted to be aligned to a politician because you are a journalist. So has this changed your understanding of journalism in in the past ten, fifteen years? Speaker 1: I mean, I've lost faith in conventional journalism. You know, I'm as I noted in my fifties, you shouldn't stay in journalism into your fifties. You'll never meet and you shouldn't, by the way, don't know old you are. Speaker 0: Only ten more years then. Speaker 1: Need to get out now, You will get bitter and jaded. Speaker 0: Turning 40. Speaker 1: It's a young man's game. You should go you should go into the energy business and become like a natural gas oligarcher. You know, do something that interesting and useful. But Speaker 0: I like my job. Have Speaker 1: to It's such a fun job. I totally agree. But but it the if you talk to any person who's been in it for thirty five years, they're all disillusioned and bitter and cynical. Like, 100%. I mean, spent my whole my dad did this, so I spent my whole life in it. And I didn't mean to stay this long. I just did. And you're not really in control of your own life. And so I have a lot of bitterness about the pretense behind journalism, which is a lie. We're totally objective. We're just, you know, we're just trying to make up and obey the rules. There are no rules. That's all fake. And so the conclusion that I've come to is the only way to proceed with integrity is just to tell the truth. Just period. Just tell the truth. With, again, with the knowledge that you are often wrong because you're a human being, but just be as honest as you can be. That's what I Speaker 0: don't know. Speaker 1: So and then Journalism, I don't know, but that's what I'm doing. Speaker 0: So and that means that you also say, I'm in favor of Trump, for example. Speaker 1: So tell the truth. There's something weird about it. It's not like calling Trump and saying, man, you know, if I endorse you, can I can you change the law to make cryptocurrency, you know, my cryptocurrency legal or whatever? That is immoral. What I think is defensible, don't if it's moral or not to be involved in any of this, but what's defensible, what I feel comfortable with, is being completely transparent about my views and my motives. That's the best I can do. Speaker 0: How has your relationship with Trump evolved since the election? Speaker 1: I mean, I I don't know if you would call it a relationship. I mean, I know him well. I've known him for over twenty years. Speaker 0: I mean, you were on the phone quite often. Right? That's gonna Yeah. For sure. How often? Speaker 1: Every night. Come on. How often? I don't know. You know, I talk to a million people all the time. I would just say this about Trump. I find him hilarious, really funny. Like one of the funniest people I've ever met. I try to deep be a deep person, kinda shallow in some ways. And if someone is hilarious, I like him. I've always liked that about Trump. I think he's tough. I admire that. We need more of that. When, you know, other world leaders come to Angela Merkel or that silly woman running Italy, and they're like, no, we need more migrants from Africa. Really? You need someone who's strong enough to be like, no. That's not our industry for not doing that. So weakness is the core problem with western leadership. Right? That's weakness. See, it's unhappy women who have no idea what they're doing, and they get bullied into doing something that's terrible for their country. Trump is tough, and so that's very important to me. And I think Trump has insights that he does not fully articulate a lot of the time, but that are that are important. You know? He has this gut sense of what matters. So the things about Trump I I absolutely love and admire, there are other things that, you know, I disagree with, and I and I try to be honest enough to say that. So I'm not an adviser to Trump. I'm someone who likes him, who admires the things that I just described. But I'm Speaker 0: When was the last time you talked to him? Oh, two weeks ago, Prophet. About Iran, Israel? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I would just say that my I don't think I've ever well, all of it is on tape, because people are always listening to you through your phone. K? Which I know you know. I don't know if your viewers know that. But the bottom of your phone, the microphone, if it is possible. This is not true for everybody. But if you are a person like you, who talks to heads of state regularly, there are individuals and governments that wanna know what the conversation is about. And so they will use this to listen to your conversation. Just a fact, your your phone calls are monitored if you are someone who's talking to powerful people. So my phone calls are monitored, obviously, and I know that. And so every conversation I've ever had with Trump, I'm sure exists somewhere in digital form, and it will probably surface. So, like, you can check this at some point probably after I'm dead. But I don't think I've ever said anything to Trump that I wouldn't say in public, ever. I've used bad language or laughed at jokes. Speaker 0: How was how was the atmosphere? I mean, if it was two weeks ago, there was a lot of public discussions, and, I mean, Trump was talking about you in public and was saying, can someone please explain to that over the top Carlson that Iran must not have a nuclear bomb? And then he added, I have no idea what Carlson means. He should say it on TV so people can actually listen. Speaker 1: That's pretty funny. Speaker 0: Did that criticism hurt you? Speaker 1: Or I actually hadn't heard that till right now, to be honest. Speaker 0: I don't believe you. Speaker 1: I I I probably Really? No. Someone told me he called me a kook. Cookie? That's pretty funny. I'm a little kooky, so that's okay. It does not my feelings. Yeah. He's I'm not surprised that he said that. He disagreed. I mean, not my view was and remains. But by the way, there have been no immediate consequences of our strike on Iran. And I'm grateful. There's been no Shiite terror attack in The United States. Our bases in all those Gulf countries have not been attacked except once in a kind of performative way. So my worries, my fears have not come true. And if that continues to be the case, I will be thrilled to be wrong. I have no pride in that at all. I just want the best for my country and for my children. So if my fears turn out to be just neuroses, great. Great. I have no need to, like, post facto justify that and be like, well, actually, no. No. If Trump was right and I was wrong, amen. Speaker 0: Do you think that Trump changed his opinion? Because, I mean, you talked to him in the past years about Iran, Israel, Ukraine, and now he sees it in a different perspective. Or is it the people around him? Speaker 1: I mean, look, I'm looking I'm looking at this from a I'm not having to make any decisions. Okay? That's not my job. There are no consequence. You know what I mean? I'm not in charge of anybody other than our staff, my family. I don't have, you know, 5,000,000 federal workers who work for me. Whatever. And I'm not running United States. So Trump is looking at this from a very different perspective from any other human being on the planet, And I don't I don't have that perspective. So it's easy for me to have opinions. He has to make decisions. That's the point. I've you know, I have said the same thing for, like, many years, which is a country should act in its own interest. And I think alliances can are great. I believe in getting along with my neighbors in other countries. I wish we got along with more countries. I think we're in cold wars. I have no idea why we're at some kind of weird undeclared war with Venezuela. I don't get that. I have I'm most mystified of all by our relationship with Russia. I don't know why Russia needs to be our enemy. I think it's bizarre. I don't think it helps United States at all. It's really hurt us. The Ukraine war has really hurt The United States. And the primacy of the US dollar, and it in a lot of ways, we should be getting along with more people. That's what I think, because I think it's good for us to have allies. On the other hand, your alliances should never drive you into actions that don't help you. You should never put the lives of your own citizens at risk on behalf of another country, period. Speaker 0: What if Trump says Iran must not have a nuclear bomb? That's what he said publicly in your direction. Speaker 1: Think a better way to say it is we don't want Iran to have a bomb. That's that reflects how I feel. I don't want Iran to have a bomb. I don't want anyone to have a bomb. I'm kind of against nuclear weapons, as Trump is and has said many times. He's very upset by the destructive power of nuclear weapons. But we won't allow something to happen, suggests power that no man has. No president of any country has the power. No human being has the power to control the future. The future is a series of hopes and unknowns over which we have very limited control. And it's important to say that out loud. I am not God. I can do my best, and that's all I can do. I cannot determine future events. I don't care what my title is. I don't care how big my army is. The future is a series of hopes and unknowns. Period. And I I'd say that now. I've said that to the president. He's not the first president I've said that to. It's just a fact. And the way that leaders get into trouble is by imagining that their desires are the same as commands. I want you to do this, is a valid thing to say. I will do everything in my power to make you do this. Fine. I am going to control what you do is impossible. So the bottom line is we don't have the power to deter I wish we did. We don't. No country does. We have we do not have the power to determine whether or not Iran has the bomb. That's beyond our power. That's not a pro Iranian statement. It's not an anti Israel or anti American system. Well, Speaker 0: you have the power to attack militarily. Speaker 1: Exactly. That's the power you have. You have the power to attack. Take out the nuclear sites you hope, and if that's the the course you're choosing, then it becomes a very specific conversation about your military capabilities. What would it take to take those out? What would it take for them to rebuild them? What would it take for them to buy a nuclear weapon from, say, Pakistan or North Korea? I mean, there are all kinds of ways to get nuclear weapons. All I'm saying is any wise course of action begins with a sober and honest assessment of your own power. What am I capable of doing? How much power do I actually have? And when you lie to yourself about how much power you actually have, you get into very serious trouble. That's called hubris, and it's the downfall of every empire. It's the destruction of every great man. It's why you sleep with your assistant. You're like, I deserve this. No one will find out. Trump said I mean, right? Are you Speaker 0: tracking with me here? Yeah. Trump said you apologized to him on the phone. Is that true? Okay. No. No? It's not true? Speaker 1: No. I will say this. I mean, bro, I don't yeah. Great. I I don't care. I really like Trump. I campaign for Trump. Just to say it again, I agree with Trump. I have agreed with Trump on the issues. Hey. I don't. I'd be happy. I am I'm the first to apologize because I am the most mindful of my limits and my own absurdities and the nonsense that I have spouted over the years. Like, I don't think I'm God. And so I'm happy to apologize, and you can ask anyone who knows me. I'm an apologizer. Speaker 0: So you're apologizing now publicly? Do I understand Speaker 1: what I'm apologize for. I didn't didn't attack Trump then. I disagreed with him. And I, you know, I I said I said how. I I wasn't you know, I didn't say I I don't think anything that would warrant an apology. Speaker 0: But that he talks publicly about you to other journalists, and it goes around the world. I mean, this shows your power. No? Speaker 1: Power. Power. Maybe I should stop Iran from having the bomb since I have so much power. I'll just will it into creation. No. I don't think I have any power at all. Speaker 0: I mean, I just Well, why would the president talk about you if you have no power? So I mean Speaker 1: Well, I don't even know what you know, power Speaker 0: Power in terms of that it hurts him if you talk publicly and that you criticize him back. Speaker 1: Him, but I would say Speaker 0: Well, you have a different opinion on Iran, Israel. Yeah. Speaker 1: I mean, I'll tell you what does have power and has nothing to do with me, the truth. The truth has power. And the truth you know what the truth is because you can see it in the reaction of people when you say it. And I don't always know what the truth is, but I can see in people's reactions, if you say something that's true, it hits differently. For good or bad, you can see it when you say it. If you say, if I assess, like if I knew what your true weaknesses were, and I don't. But if I did, and I said them out loud, if I gave voice to them, I articulated them, I could you'd be wounded by it if I said it. And the same with me. If you knew my heart, and you knew what was really wrong with me, you said it out loud, it would hurt. Speaker 0: So so do you think Trump was wounded because you said No. I from your mean, perspective Trump Trump's the Speaker 1: saying the power comes from telling the truth. And you can tell who's telling the truth because those people aren't afraid. People who lie are afraid. And I look at the leaders, especially on your continent, which I can't overstate. I mean, my ancestors are from Europe, but I love Europe. I spent a lot of the year in Europe. And I look at your leaders, Starmer, your absurd leader in Germany, all these little tiny people. Speaker 0: You mean Friedrich Maels or you mean Olaf We have a new leader now. Oh, I'm Speaker 1: I I follow it. And I know that, both of them. I would say all I don't wanna single anybody out because I consider them all midgets. But more will they're Speaker 0: But Trump likes him, Foolie Mess. They have a good connection. Speaker 1: Who knows what Trump thinks of him? I'm just saying he's absurd. Why? Because if you think that the answer to Germany's many and growing problems is fighting a war with Russia, you're an absurd human being. If you can't even defend your own first of if you're allowing foreign troops on your soil, you have no self respect at all. There are 35 thirty three, thirty five thousand American troops on German soil. They've been there for eighty years. Speaker 0: Well, I would say Speaker 1: What are they doing then? Speaker 0: Well, what would we have done without US troops? Would say, I mean Speaker 1: What are you talking about? Speaker 0: Well, they saved us. Speaker 1: The Soviet Union fell in the 1991. You tell me what American troops are saving you from. American troops and I love American troops. I am American. Okay? I'm not against American troops. I know a lot of American troops. I'm merely saying foreign troops from another nation on your soil is degrading. It's totally degrading. And that is a basic fact that everyone knows. One of the reasons we had a revolution in this country and threw off the colonial yoke of England was because British troops were stationed on our soil, dating our daughters, degrading us. And that is like a very basic fact that has been consistent through all history. When you have foreign soldiers on your soil, you do not have sovereignty. And it's very hard to have self respect. And the fact that no one in Germany can say that, no one in Germany can say, wait a second, Prussia got eliminated in 1947 by The United States, Great Britain, and Stalin, and we've never reconstituted it? The heart of Germany? We we're we're so embarrassed. And I'm saying this to someone who loves the Germanic people. I am a Germanic person. I don't understand how any German leader could put up with the level of humiliation that Germany has put up with for eighty years. There's no one living in Germany who's responsible for the crimes of the nineteen thirties and forties. I don't understand why you're continuing to pay reparations, continuing to allow your country to be occupied. I don't understand why you don't assert sovereignty. And the truth is, the German Germanic peoples, and I'm including, you know, the Dutch and the Scandinavians, and a lot of the English, as as sure you know, all Germanic. It's all Germanic. They are what makes your brain, actually. They're the hardest working, the smartest, the tidiest, the cleanest, the most punctual. Those are values that I think are important, actually. I don't mock those. Those are real. I don't know how people who did everything that Germanic peoples did could allow themselves to be degraded and could internalize the hate and allow it to become self hate. And whenever you bring even now I'm talking to you, I can tell it's making you uncomfortable I'm saying Speaker 0: that No. I don't have self hate. Speaker 1: Prussia. It's like Speaker 0: I don't have sulfate. Speaker 1: But what what happened to Prussia? I don't understand. That's Berlin. Like, what? How could you allow a foreign power to say you can no longer have a region, and no one in the subsequent years has ever said, wait a second. This is our country. We'll we'll call our regions whatever we wanna call them. We're gonna call this Prussia, and we're gonna boot out foreign troops. Doesn't mean we're gonna invade anyone or be invaded. We are a great country. So any leader who doesn't say that has my contempt. Speaker 0: Well That's Speaker 1: what I'm saying. Speaker 0: If if we talk about Sorry. The situation Speaker 1: Oh, he's a Nazi. No. No. I'm not a Nazi. I hate the Nazis. Speaker 0: If we talk about the situation right now, I would say that many Germans are happy that there is American troops on the ground. Speaker 1: Sure. They are. They've Speaker 0: been so Speaker 1: brainwashed and so sad. Speaker 0: Well, they're afraid there's people who are afraid of Russia and of Russian troops attacking. Speaker 1: I'm sure your whole country's afraid of Russia and Russian troops. That's the sad thing. But you're not afraid of millions of migrants who are wrecking your country? And it's a kind of weird masochism with the Germans. And it bothers me because they don't deserve it because they're inherently impressive and have been for thou since they took down Rome. Who took down Rome? The Germanic tribes because they're amazing people. I don't think they should sack Rome. I'm not saying that. I think what happened, obviously, in your country in eighty years of disgusting, I hate all that. Of course, I hate all that. It's anti Christian, anti Semitic. I hate everything about it. However, that doesn't mean that your culture is worthless or that you should give it up to people from Speaker 0: Nobody says that. Africa. Speaker 1: Like, what are you doing? And it's wrecking your country, and no one can say anything about it. Well, that's what it does is like, oh, you're a Nazi. I'm not a Nazi. I'm a German. I want German Germany for Germans. Like, why is that bad to say? Speaker 0: Average German. Has a background, Speaker 1: dinner with a German, and I'm like, what the hell is going on? Why are you letting all these people in your country to live on the street, rape people, trash your country? They're like, they can't talk about it. They get so, like, oh, shut up. Speaker 0: Elon Elon Elon Elon Musk was talking a lot about it, like, during the election. Speaker 1: Elon Musk or Nazis? Speaker 0: So so he was in favor of of the AFD during the election. He was campaigning for them. You seem so weak to me. How about Do you have do you have contacts to to politicians in Germany, AFD politicians? Speaker 1: Not really. No. I'm just not that Speaker 0: What does it mean not really? So you have? Speaker 1: No. It's like, I've met people. I guess I just travel a lot. Right? But in general, it's not about AFD or social average or any specific party or politician. It's about a mindset that, look, we abhor things a government calling itself German, run by a guy who wasn't even German, did. That's disgusting. There are certain lessons to learn from that. You know, obvious lessons, which we seem to have forgotten, by the way, but whatever. There are certain lessons. I think that's important and great. I'd never make apologies for the Nazis. My gosh. But you should also never make apologies for German culture, for the long, you know, thousand year history of the not really country, but region, multi thousand year history of it, like, the Germanic peoples are great. Compared to what? Compared to who? Like, you have allowed them, and it's in your school system, as you know, I'm sure you went through the brainwashing, where they're like, you spend a year learning how you should hate yourself and your people Speaker 0: Not really. Not really. Not really. Speaker 1: Something happened to you guys because you're I've never met a more masochistic people. And here's the problem with it. It offends me. So I'm not German. I don't live there. But it offends me because and it's dangerous because if you convince someone to hate himself, and the world is convinced Germans to hate themselves, they really hate themselves. They have weird sex lives as a result. But but that's not the the real threat. The real threat is if you hate yourself, you're probably not gonna love me, actually. It creates a kind of hostile people who hate themselves are actually hostile toward other people. And I just think, whether it's AFG, I don't care who it is, the first German leader who stands up and says, I'm totally opposed to the Nazis, obviously. That's not even a conversation. That was eighty years ago. Are there any Nazis left? No. It's nothing to do with the Nazis. I'm pro German. I think we should be proud of our history, our culture, our language. If you're not German, this is the indigenous population of the region. The indigenous population. Because if you're not part of that, you can leave. That I don't know why that's embarrassing. If if someone stood up in Beijing, China and said, we're proud of the millennia long history of Chinese civilization, culture, language. If you're not Chinese, I don't know if you should be living here. It would would you call that person a racist or a Nazi? Know, I'd like, that sounds kinda legitimate. Speaker 0: Because I get it. Because you you talked about our history, German history. He hosted Daryl Cooper. Speaker 1: Daryl Cooper. He's so dangerous. Speaker 0: Lowell, a highly, I would say, controversial historian. Speaker 1: He's not highly controversial. He's Speaker 0: one of Speaker 1: the most popular historians on the entire year. Speaker 0: Well, claimed that the Nazis never intended to kill 6,000,000 Jews. He said that. Speaker 1: He certainly didn't claim that. Said Well, Speaker 0: I did. He's he's Speaker 1: proceeding more No. No. No. Shit propaganda. Speaker 0: I was What are you listening to? I was listening to it. He said it was just an accident, and he said Speaker 1: Did not that's sitting right there. Speaker 0: Let me quote that that the Nazis simply didn't know how to care for for that many people. Speaker 1: He did not say the Holocaust was an accident. He did not say that. He was speaking very specifically of and he may be wrong, by the way. I don't know. And I'm not endorsing it. I'm just saying the point that he was making was a discrete specific point about the treatment of prisoners in Poland and Russia, the East, during the war. He said, and I I don't know if it's true or not, but it certainly wasn't denying the Holocaust or coming out in favor of Hitler. He was saying that the Germans rounded up all these people and let them die. And you could argue whether that's a greater crime or less criminal, whatever, but that is not denying the Holocaust and is not pro Nazi. And a small number me finish. A small number of propagandists on the Internet decided to paint him as a Nazi. Now why did they do that? Because there are all kinds of lessons that we drew from World War two that are false. And why does that matter? It matters because the Western order, the postwar order is based on those assumptions. And one of the key assumptions, and it's destroyed your country, and I hope you reverse it, is that it is a threat to the world when a a homogenous European white Christian country exists. That's just not true. Okay? And it's on the basis of that assumption. Speaker 0: But if he says Speaker 1: Your country in Western Europe has been destroyed by mass migration. Speaker 0: But, okay, but that's that's a different topic. But if he says that Nazis simply didn't know how to take care for that many people, I mean Speaker 1: He wasn't talking about the Holocaust, dude. So that's just a fact, and you can ask him, and he's been asked a million times. And his answer is really, really clear. I'm not denying that the Germans rounded up and murdered Jews. What? I'm not Speaker 0: Well, it's about the plan. So he said it was more like, yeah, the Wannseekonserens. No. I'm not reading. I'm I'm I'm Speaker 1: Last this Speaker 0: I I was listening to it. Yeah. Speaker 1: By the way Yeah. Should I I could also say, I'm not responsible for Derek Daryl Cooper's views. Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. No. I'm just Speaker 1: I just interviewed the president of Iran. I'm not a Shiite. You know what I mean? My and you can ask Daryl Cooper, who'd be happy to take your call. I'm sure. What I'm interested in is the current state of Europe. And as a lifelong traveler to your family in Europe, whose ancestors are from Europe, who believes in European Christian culture and has watched it be destroyed over the last hundred and twenty years since 1914. I'm wondering, like, how the hell did this happen, and how do we fix it? Because I really care about it. Okay? And I think that one of the factors, not the only factor, but one of the factors in the destruction of Europe was this last sentence that our leaders internalized, and you were clearly taught at school, that a homogenous country in Western Europe is a threat to world peace. That is that is an actual assumption that I think everyone in Europe has just sort of imbibed, And I think it is factually false and incredibly destructive, and it's the reason that Europe is increasingly non European. And I find it so wild that you're not allowed to say that, that it's considered somehow Nazi or racist to say, like, what percentage of Germany will be German? And the answer in a hundred years. And the answer is probably less than half. Is that okay with you? This is the indigenous population of the country. Then the question is like, well, I mean, we're all Germans. This is crazy. There's no other part of the world that is held to this absurd fantasy standard where, you know, it doesn't matter if the majority of the country is actually from that country, whose ancestors built the country, created the language, the culture, the music, the art. It's just like, shut up, Nazi. And where does that come from? That's where we are right now. Everyone is totally afraid. I am just so proudly anti Nazi that I I don't feel guilty saying it. It's just true. And why can't we say it? We can't say it because of that lesson that we learned, and it's a false lesson. So, like, there are lots of false lessons that we learned from history. It's not the only one, but it's important to tell the truth. Don't you think? Or no one in the media thinks it's important to tell the truth. The second you say something is true, they're like, shut up. Look. He he was denying the holocaust. No. He wasn't. I want Speaker 0: to talk about Putin, about Ukraine, Putin, Russia. You interviewed Putin. How was it? Speaker 1: It was interesting. It was really interesting. I mean, I I'm not I've never been particularly interested in Russia. I was interested in the Soviet period. Read a lot about it, studied in college. But post Soviet Russia, I'm an expert, and didn't I had no plans to do it, and it was really the Ukraine war. It was my frustration at the total blockade against all information from Russia. I just felt like it was important for Americans to hear from the guy they were fighting. In fact, most Americans didn't even know we're waging a war against Russia. They're like, oh, no. We're supporting a no. We're fighting a war against Russia. Now maybe we should be. Maybe we shouldn't be, but we should at least know what we're doing. So that's why I went. I was infuriated for the first part of the interview because I thought he was manhandling me. Speaker 0: He was talking like forty five He minutes, Speaker 1: was just like, just woo me back. Speaker 0: Did you try to did you try to get into it? Or like I Speaker 1: tried for like one pushback, and then I was like, I can't win this. We're speaking through an interpreter, and it'll just get garbled, and I'll say half a sentence, and they'll say half a sentence. And I was just like, I'm just gonna let him go. Speaker 0: It was a historical lecture at the beginning. Right? Speaker 1: The historical lecture that I was not qualified to assess at all. I don't know the history of the Rus'. I was pretty ignorant, actually, about Russian Ukrainian history. I know the I know a lot post October 1917, but from October 1917 till August '91, I have a pretty good handle on it. But before that, I I really don't. So so I thought so I was highly annoyed. I thought, here I show up at Putin, and he's just treating me like a bitch. You know? He's just, like, rolling right over me. And and then I thought to myself, there's nothing I can do about it. And this was going through my head at the time, and just let him talk. It'll be interesting, actually, to get this on tape. I don't fully understand the importance of it, but I'm doing this not for myself or to prove that I'm virtuous. Now these reporters want a guy I've done this myself when I was a kid. You go in these interviews with some bad person, and you're like, really, the point of the interview is be like, I'm a good person. Why are you a good person? I don't care if you feel like I'm a good person. I care if my wife and children and my friends say I'm a Speaker 0: good person. But do you think you were critical enough with Sam? Or Speaker 1: Well, like that's exactly the kind of low IQ Speaker 0: Low IQ question? Speaker 1: Headspace I was talking about. But I won't talk to about it, and hopefully it'll grow out of, where you feel like the point of the interview is to show, like, he's bad. I'm good. And it's like, do you really need for a Western audience to make the case that Putin is bad? I I really wanna be the first American journalist to make the revolutionary statement that Putin is bad. Well, I Speaker 0: I Putin's bad. You're bad. I wouldn't say I wouldn't say it's about how bad he is. Speaker 1: He's bad. Speaker 0: But, I mean, about what he did in Ukraine. Like yeah. Well but, I mean Speaker 1: So do you what would be the point of that? To show that Speaker 0: Well, I would would have been interested to see his reaction. Like, if he if he believes Speaker 1: but well, you can go back and look at it. It's, like, 27 long or something Speaker 0: like I I I watched it all. Speaker 1: So I thought it was interesting. I, you know, I I've interviewed a lot of as you have, a lot of heads of state and just to know if you just didn't know if you'd won the other day from this building. And, you know, there's really a limit to what you can get, is the truth. And so I think and I've thought about this I've done this for, you know, many years. So I've thought about it a lot. And I think the best you're gonna get really is the person feeling more comfortable in talking. I think what you want is I think people become less guarded the more they talk. That has been my experience, just talking to people my whole life. And if you can calm him down a little bit and just let Speaker 0: him go. But Putin is a bit different. No? I mean, he's a he was an intelligence officer. He knows how to control emotions. Speaker 1: They're all in you know, that's what I'm not defending Putin, who I think has done a great job for Russia. Much better job than any German leader. That's for sure. Your country is going down. Russia's going up. You should be mad at your own leaders. You're mad at Putin instead. Well, but Makes me laugh. Speaker 0: Putin is a war criminal instead. Speaker 1: War criminal. Right? Who Well, Angela Merkel wrecked your country through mass migration, but she's not a criminal. Wow. How does that work? Literally wrecked your country. It will not recover in your lifetime or mine, but she's cool because why? Speaker 0: I didn't say she's cool. But I mean She's a criminal. But you can't I'm Speaker 1: like criminal. She let millions of people into your country Speaker 0: I would say didn't who and it Speaker 1: hasn't worked. So, like, so whatever. Yeah. All criminals I I kind of agree with that, but let me just say this. The the intel he's an intel officer. Putin's smart. He's Slavic. I'm not Slavic. It is a different way of thinking. That's just true. I know you spend a lot of time in Slavic countries. It's hard for the non Slav to kind of understand the way that people think. Different cultures think differently. Oh, I don't know if we're allowed to admit this or not. Even Finland, they think differently. And so it's hard to know exactly. Right? And there are many layers of deception. He was a KGB officer in Germany. I think that's actually a really important part of his biography that people misread, but whatever. Here's the point. He is no different from any other long serving leader in that what he says and does is large, heavily determined by the imperatives of the intel agencies he runs. They're all intel officers, actually. He's been in there for twenty five years. If he he was a KGB officer in East Germany. Okay. Got it. The the truth is he's been running the country for twenty five years. So they all think the same. They all do. I mean, you've interviewed a bunch of these. Speaker 0: Why why do you think he talked to you? Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, my gosh. I didn't even understand the history of the roost. I can't I can't divine his motives. I think he talked to me because I I don't know. I mean, I would imagine that it's it's crazy to but I'm not whatever. I'm not mad at Putin. Never have been. Speaker 0: I am. Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay. You should be mad at your own leaders. You know, Putin didn't let in millions of immigrants Well, Speaker 0: mean, his soldiers killed friends of mine, colleagues So when I was in Speaker 1: that's friends die in war. They were ordered into war by American leaders. So I had a good friend die in the Iraq war. And so am I mad at Saddam Hussein? No. I'm mad because he wouldn't have been there. It's a guy from Washington DC, Northwest Washington DC, and he's in Baghdad. Why was he in Baghdad? He was in Baghdad because George w Bush was pushed into supporting a war that's not a lie. So that's I I think what I think what we're being trained to do, and you clearly are the victim of this, is quite a sophisticated operation, is to channel people's frustration into directions that serve the people who caused the frustration in the first place. Your country's a mess because your leaders suck. That's the fact. Well, but You're mad about that, so they take your anger, and they're like, oh, no. It's Putin's fault. It's Putin's fault. Okay. Got it. I disagree. I disagree. Speaker 0: It's like you that's incontestable. Not really because it's two different things. One is the immigration crisis. The other thing is what happened in Russia, and I can see it from different perspectives. But I wanted to, like, talk to you about, you know, Putin a little bit longer. Speaker 1: So look look, I think from my I'm just incorrigibly American. I'm interested in the world, but, like, I'm really just American, and I always try to remember that. Like, I just have an American point of view, and everything about me is American. And from my perspective, my my people, the population of The United States and the West, but America needed to hear from the guy they were fighting. And you can hate him all you want. I don't care if you hate Putin. I'm not emotionally connected to any of this. He's not my president. But you hate him or love him. You're also allowed to love him if you want. Speaker 0: I mean, I would love to interview him, obviously, because we're both journalists. Speaker 1: We should hear from people and allow our audience, our readers, or our viewers to make up their own minds because once again, they're not slaves, they're citizens, and they have absolute an absolute right to know what their government is doing with their money in their name. And that's our job, is to bring that information to them. Speaker 0: I I agree I agree with with you on that. It's super important to to read what's going on. I we are to say It's the only Speaker 1: serving our audience. That's it. And most journalists, like, lose track of that. And, like, the hate I got not that I ever talked to other journalists because there's no one dumber or more tiresome than a journalist. I hate to say that. That's true. You're the first journalist I've talked to in Speaker 0: a long time. And how dumb do you think I am? Speaker 1: I'm just upset about what's happened to Germany. It really matters. It really matters. You can't allow your allies to destroy your main source of cheap energy and then pretend they didn't do it just because you were taught in school to hate yourself because of the second world war. Okay. Okay. You have Yeah. You cannot allow your allies to destroy your main source of energy, your economy, and move BASF off out of your country. Because This is so bonkers what you're Speaker 0: allowing NATO to do to to understand. Why are Speaker 1: allowing this? Speaker 0: Just to understand. So you still think that The US is behind the Nord Stream Attack? Speaker 1: It's a distinction without a difference. So what we know is from RCA, which has announced it, and I don't think the German government has denied it, it wasn't Putin who blew up his own pipeline. Okay. Speaker 0: Well, it looks like the Ukrainian did it. Speaker 1: Okay. So what is Ukraine? Is it a sovereign country? No. It exists at the pleasure of NATO, and that would be two main countries, United States and Germany, its most important NATO ally. Now there is a provision in the NATO agreement, which is often invoked in conversation, that says when a NATO ally is attacked, the other nations of NATO, the signatories to the treaty, defend that nation. So here you have a situation where Germany was attacked in the largest act of industrial sabotage in human history. Was also the largest man made c o two emission in history. By the way, I thought we were worried about the climate. Apparently not. And The United States did that. Now whether they did it through the Norwegians or through the Ukrainians, it doesn't matter. The Biden administration said they were gonna do it, and they did it. And they never deny it. And Germany sat there and allowed its main NATO ally to attack it. And then whenever you bring it up, as I have many times, hey, German guy I'm having dinner with, like, what the fuck was that? Why did you allow your NATO ally to destroy your main source of cheap energy? And they're like, oh, shut up. And it's like, get some self respect. Demand baseline treatment that any human being would demand. Don't lie to me. Don't sabotage my economy. Don't pretend to be my ally when you're actually hurting me. Like, the world will be a lot safer and happier and more prosperous. I mean, Germany leads Europe. Germany is Europe. That's that's my position as a non European. It's like that is Europe. And if Germany dies, if its economy dies, and that's dying, as you know, everyone's lying about it, but it is, then Europe is gone. And Europe is the light of the world. It's the light of the world. Everything from the printing press to democrat everything that we care about comes from Europe. And it's lost confidence in itself. And why is it up to me, an American, who doesn't speak German to be like, oh, Germany, please don't don't commit suicide. Why? Because I think it's so important for the world, and it makes you so uncomfortable when I'm Speaker 0: saying No. Speaker 1: Oh, is this Nazi stuff? Speaker 0: No. Not not at all. Not at all. I I I'm just listening. I just don't don't want to interrupt you Speaker 1: all If I had a German accent, every and I wish I did. Every if I spoke like Henry Kissinger, every time I spoke, would go like this. I'm just listening. Talking Speaker 0: talking talking talking about Putin. After your interview, I mean, it's been now Nicotee. Oh, no. No. Thank you. Yeah. Please. So it's been one and a half years now since your interview with Putin, and now we see a shift of Donald Trump. Is it a shift? I mean, the fifty days he gives Putin to react on a ceasefire and saying, if that's not happening, you know, we we put on tariffs on on countries doing business with Russia. What's your opinion on that? Speaker 1: It's a this is Thursday in mid July. I've lost track of what the date is. I don't know when this is gonna air. This is a moving target. You know, they're this is being this is evolving as we're speaking. So I'm not privy to any details that you're not privy to, but I don't know where this is going. But I would say that the outcome look. We need to be honest about where this is gonna wind up in the there are two kind of two places it could wind up. One is with, you know, Russian victory. They've already won in a lot of important ways. They were always gonna win because Speaker 0: Well, I would disagree on that because, I mean Speaker 1: The population is a 100,000,000 more people. Speaker 0: Yeah. This is an argument. But wait. If you say they've won, that means they reached all their targets. Like, the four regions plus Crimea, they also wanted to be Speaker 1: on Kyiv. That's a totally fair point. What is winning? Ukraine is it's hard to imagine Ukraine is getting all of its land back that it had February three years ago. Whatever. It's this has clearly destroyed Ukraine. I think it's really hurt Russia as well. We can't get a clear number on casualties. Everyone lies about it. All people tell you much they love Ukraine, and I my heart bleeds for the Ukrainians. Can't tell you how many Ukrainians have died. They don't care enough to find out. So they're frauds, and they have blood on their hands, in my opinion. But whatever. Stop. I'll stop demoralizing. Here's the point. How do you get out of this? How do you get now, I think it serves the interests of a lot of European leaders, including your leader, to continue it as long as possible, because it gives their domestic populations an enemy to focus their hate on. So as their economies are dying, young people can't afford homes. They can't I mean, energy costs in Europe, particularly in Germany, but also France and Spain, also The UK, are so much higher than they were thirty years ago. The whole people's standard of living is declining really fast. As you know, people are not having children. That's the clearest sign of civilizational collapse, obviously. So there's a lot of pent up rage. And in Germany, lot of it, as I've said 10 times, is self hatred. There's a lot of rage in Europe, and I feel it every time I'm there. And so the Russia Ukraine war is a perfect safety relief valve for European leaders to be like, no. No. It's Putin's fault. And you watch a kind of sad response in The UK when started to say, no. We're gonna fight a new war against Russia now. They can't beat Russia. Russia could stomp The UK in one day. It's a joke. Okay? No. It's a they could nuke it. They could hit with hypersonic missiles. It's a tiny island. Speaker 0: I don't Speaker 1: know if you've there. Yeah. Right. Speaker 0: But Speaker 1: So in real life, in military terms, it's not a real fight between the UK and Russia. Why is he saying that? And why would beating Russia be on the even list of things to do if you're British because your people have been betrayed by you and turning their rage eastward towards some guy who's got nothing to do with anything in The UK or Germany is the fastest way to keep your population in their narcotic haze. Totally Speaker 0: disagree on that, but it's not a part Speaker 1: of what disagree with That's obviously true. Speaker 0: No. It's not. Because That's true. I mean What's the Speaker 1: cut from Russia? Speaker 0: Well, if you talk to to intelligence people, or if you talk to the military Talk to the intelligence. What what We're liars. Speaker 1: I mean You know, I need to I need to check-in with German intelligence more often to find out. Speaker 0: Not I mean, German intelligence is not as good. Speaker 1: Pull up the Nordschutz pipeline. But do they know? Speaker 0: That's how we You've been talking intelligence I mean Speaker 1: do say about the Nord Stream pipeline? Speaker 0: Well, I think they're pretty sure that the Ukrainians did it. The Ukrainians Speaker 1: did it. Speaker 0: Yeah. Independents But let's let's now talk about the risk of lot to say. Well, no. Wait. Mister Carlsberg, let's talk about this threat. I mean Is this threat? The threat, and if Russia could also attack NATO countries. I mean, that's the NATO countries. Speaker 1: That's the argument from Russia will attack NATO countries if they keep poking them, for sure. So why would you want that? Why would you want Latvia to be vaporized? Speaker 0: You so you so you think that NATO country's provoking Russia, that's why they would attack? Speaker 1: Putting Ukraine into NATO is insane. It doesn't serve the interest of Ukraine. Speaker 0: But it's not happening. Sure. Speaker 1: The reason we had this war in the first place is because the vice president of The United States went to the Munich Security Conference, which I think is in your country. Munich is Munich. Yeah. Prussia was eliminated, not Munich. It's still there. And it was in Munich that February, and Kamala Harris, who's I'm not attacking her. She says what she's told to say, says, Chuzeleinsky at a press conference. We want you in NATO. Russia's greatest fear are check the tape. Russia's greatest fear, as articulated by Putin, but not just Putin, also Yeltsin, has been that Western American, NATO's America, American weapons, nuclear weapons would be on its eastern border. Why wouldn't Speaker 0: it Schultz, Macron, everybody was against Ukraine being a NATO. They were always blocking it. Even Merkel before blocked it. Speaker 1: So I'm highly aware of that. Yeah. What they really think about it is another question. Speaker 0: Well, think Merkel really opposed it. Okay. Speaker 1: But I'm of course, I know that. But I also know that days before this war broke out, before Russia rolled across the border into Ukraine, the US government said officially, we want Ukraine in NATO. And that's what started this war. Putin said that immediately afterward. He gave a speech, which I refer you to, which is really interesting. We're not allowed to listen to Putin because everything he says is a lie or something. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. I think this decision was was made already before. I mean, we can Okay. Speaker 1: That It may have been Yeah. Made already before the threat from the Russian perspective, and to acknowledge someone else's perspective is not to endorse that perspective. It's merely to understand it, which is a critical component of decision making. From the Russian perspective, the threat is NATO moving eastward. Putin has been president since February. The president that well, with whatever, but has been in charge since February. He has said that to every American president. Yeltsin said it before him. From the Russian perspective, they gave up their empire. Their empire collapsed. They ran out of money. They move you know, a lot of things happened, which I'm sure you're aware of. But what never changed was the Russian insistence that you not put nuclear weapons on a border. And I think every country but Germany, which has American troops on its border, should get them out immediately. Every country every normal country is like, that's not acceptable. How could you allow your rival to put nuclear weapons on your border? We would not accept that in The United States. If China put nuclear weapons in Tijuana, Mexico, that would be a crisis for us. The Soviet Union put nuclear weapons in Havana, Cuba 90 miles from The United States in 1962, and we almost had a a thermonuclear war over it. So that's a legitimate perspective. That's a legitimate concern from the Russian perspective. No matter how pro NATO you are or anti Russian you are, you can understand that's a real thing. That's not a bullshit thing. It's not like they woke up in morning and they're like, we need to expand the territory of the world's largest country. Let's take Poland. Do you really think that? Do you really think the Russians want Germany? Do you think that? Do you think there's a threat that they're gonna invade Germany? Speaker 0: No. I think You're just being equal. Take out the American I think there is a threat that they might invade or tried and test Estonia, for example, or other Baltic states after, you know, they they they've done that with Ukraine. Speaker 1: Or you're willing you're willing to risk nuclear war in the defense of Estonia? Speaker 0: I'm not saying this. I'm just saying there is a threat of it that they Speaker 1: might What I'm saying is we are now on the cusp of a nuclear conflict between The United States and Russia. It emerged three days ago that the president of The United States and the I don't know if you call him president, Zelensky, who's in charge of Ukraine, had a conversation in which they discussed missiles that could hit Moscow. Speaker 0: If You're talking about the Financial Times report where Trump asked Speaker 1: and denied Speaker 0: It exactly. Yeah. Speaker 1: By the White House. So if there was a Financial Times report that Putin and Xi were discussing missiles that could hit Washington. Speaker 0: So let's talk about this report. Yeah. Speaker 1: That would as an American, that would lead me to believe we're on the brink of a conflict. And by the way, we need to go to war with anyone who's threatening our capital city with missiles. Are you joking? Speaker 0: So let's talk about this conversation. Speaker 1: Has has there ever been a report that Putin is targeting any German city with missiles? Speaker 0: I mean, there's constant reports and No. There hasn't. Russian TV. Let me just Well, and and Russian TV. Well, did you ask me a question or not? No, I'm sorry, you're you're right, I did. You got nailed the fuck off here. So there's many reports in Russian TV actually saying we have to attack Berlin, you know, we have to nuke them. I mean, it's not Putin himself, but it's a propaganda TV. Speaker 1: I'm kinda making my point, which is, you know, of the many kind of contemptibly childish, truly contemptibly childish assumptions people have about the world and international relations, one the one that drives me the craziest is that there are absolute leaders. There are no absolute leaders in this world or in your home. Every leader, every leader, that included Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong, every leader, that includes MBS in Saudi Arabia, MBZ in Emirates, doesn't matter what you call yourself or what, you know, whether you're a king, it doesn't matter. You have constituencies, and you have to balance those constituencies. And that's true for Putin too. And I'm just telling you what anybody who knows anything about contemporary Russia will tell you, which is Putin is very mad at the West. He's less mad at the West than anyone else who might replace him. Let's talk that's the truth. Putin, there's no evidence that Putin wants to bomb Berlin. You know that. Or London or Washington. But there's a lot of evidence that Ukraine and The United States are thinking about, openly talking about bombing Moscow. And I'm just saying, whether you think that's a good idea or not, that's nuclear war. Okay? That's nuclear war. What does that mean? Speaker 0: Okay. Let's talk about this report. So it was a discussion between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky, and it's reported that Trump asked Zelensky, could you target Moscow? Could you target Saint Petersburg? Is that the Trump you know? Are you surprised? Speaker 1: I wasn't if that conversation is real, I'm shocked by the recklessness of it. I'm shocked by the recklessness of it. I have four children. I have a vested interest in this country and in this world. And anyone who takes the threat of nuclear war lightly is my enemy. And that would include most world leaders. Speaker 0: How do you Speaker 1: consider them enemies for that? This implicates me and you and every person in this room. And we sit back and we're like and and you think I'm some sort of like hippie peasnik or something or some left wing green or something. Speaker 0: I'm not. But if people Speaker 1: an American right winger, but I bet for bet children. And if you're risking the future of the world and their lives Speaker 0: But but what's against you. Mister Carson, what what's interesting here is from from my perspective is that Trump was more or less always on your side in the past months. He was criticizing Zelensky. He was, you know, talking to Putin. He said very friendly words about Putin. So he was never really pressuring. So and this has changed in the past week. So why is that? I mean, couldn't it be that that you were Speaker 1: I can't even I don't accept the premise of the question because I don't know that it's true. Why? And I would say, well, you're showing up at my house on a day when we are literally right in the middle of this. And I and I don't understand exactly what's going on. I don't know how much of it is true. I will just say this. In our government, as in every government, I was trying to explain this about Putin or any world leader, there are constituencies that are fighting all the time to gain privacy, to gain control. And in Washington, there are the biggest battle in Washington, this has been going on for over twenty years since 09/11, has been between the realists and the neocons or whatever you wanna call them, people who believe in preserving the American empire through force, who think you can bring democracy and a better life through killing people, and those who doubt them. But let's talk about facts, mister Galish. Ongoing, so I don't know what the hell is Speaker 0: going But wait. There there is one fact. Trump said, you have fifty days. He said it to Putin. Otherwise, there will be sanctions. There's also a fact that he said, okay Sanctions? Well, yeah. Speaker 1: And for the first time, we're gonna levy some sanctions on Russia. Speaker 0: Well, I'm just saying that what what Trump said. Well, he said that for every country is doing business with Russia, there would secondary sanctions. Yeah. Yeah. 100% tariffs. So that Speaker 1: means if Russia because Russia's, of course, economy is not it's quite a robust manufacturing economy, but it's still a petro it's an oil and gas economy, to some large extent, mineral economy. If the Indians and the Chinese, the two biggest players of oil, period, but certainly from Russia, if they we catch them buying Russian oil, we will sanction them for that. That is the I that's my understanding of the threat. You know, I I have no idea if that will happen. I mean, we're in a period where there are a lot of abrupt changes. I think if the United States government were to attempt to do something like that, we would merely reveal, as we have consistently for the last twenty five years, the limits of our power. And that to me is were a big part of the tragedy since 09/11, particularly the Iraq war, but also what we've done all around the world since then, is that the second things become kinetic, the second you actually use force rather than just threaten force, and I would include sanctions as an expression of force. Sanctions are an act of violence, of course, against the civilian population mostly, but whatever. You reveal how powerless you really are. You think in other words, when you're, you know, if you say to your kids, if you do that, will spank you, your child lives in fear of being spanked, and that will, one hopes, keep him on the straight note, keep him from doing a bad thing. But when you actually spank a child or if you ever spanked as a child, you I don't know if spanking is allowed in Germany, except sexually. But in a parental context, when you spank a child, the child feels the pain and then realizes, I'll survive this. It's not as bad as you thought it was. And that was one of the stories that I hoped to tell when I was in Russia. We levied sanctions against Russia that have no precedent. We just, like, stole people, stuff people had nothing to do with the Russian government. The oligarchs who had nothing to do with the invasion of Ukraine, some of whom opposed the invasion of Ukraine publicly, and we just stole their stuff, billions of dollars worth of real estate and boats and airplanes we just stolen and called it sanctions. Well, talk about a talk about the end of the rule of law. But on. Let me finish. And what was the net effect? Did Russia fall into dire poverty? No. It looks So we look weak. Speaker 0: But it looks like that your president is highly frustrated by Putin. That's what he's saying. He's saying publicly that he's on the phone with him, and then he comes back to his wife, to Malaria, and he says, look. You know, I had a really good phone call with with Putin. And then she says, oh, really? He just bombed again another city in Ukraine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, there's a war going on. Yeah. That's what happens when war cities but that's why I'm against wars. But negotiations are really frustrating. They're frustrating with your wife. They're frustrating with Vladimir Putin. It's frustrating because you don't get everything you want. Speaker 0: But he changed his Speaker 1: a while. People get frustrated. They make threats. Do they make good on those threats? I don't know. Not always. I don't make good on all my threats. Try not to make too many threats. But when I do, I don't always make good on them. And that may be the case here. But I think it's important to recognize that diplomacy is really difficult. That's why it's so rare. But when the option is nuclear war, it's worth doing. What are Speaker 0: the options from your perspective Speaker 1: right now? The US is running out of options in Russia. Running out of options in Russia. Because the truth is the Russian economy is not what we thought it was, and we were assured by some of the dumbest people on the planet who currently serve in the United States Senate that Russia was merely, and I'm quoting now, a gas station with nuclear weapons. It somehow kind of never built Saint Petersburg, and Tolstoy and Dostoevsky didn't exist, and they were just this, like, kind of desert nation with a lot of gas and whip. I mean, it was absurd. Like, the the so we underestimated, and frankly, just didn't really understand the nature of the Russian economy, Russian civilization. And I'm not endorsing that economy or civilization. I'm just saying we didn't understand what it was. And so we levied these sanctions on. We cut them off, kick them on a swift. And we, in the end, hurt ourselves more than we hurt Russia. We sent a very clear signal to the rest of the world, and you're you guys are implicated in us also in Germany and in Europe more broadly because the US dollar is relevant to you. Sorry. We sent a very clear message to everybody. Don't hold your assets and dollars because they can be used as a political weapon. It was the dumbest thing I've ever seen. If you wanna hurt yourself, do that. And I think it's just been a tragedy. So does that leave us with kind of like, what options does that leave us with? It doesn't really. Russia fundamentally they don't want everything they wanted. I'm not even sure what they wanted. They wanted the west to back off. But in some basic way, they won. And we have to acknowledge that. And it's really hard for a I don't I'm not in favor of Russia winning anything. I'm American. I wanna win. But that you you can't lie to yourself. They won. And so on the basis of Speaker 0: In which way did they win? Speaker 1: They took land, and they don't have to give it back. And short of bombing them with nuclear weapons, we can't make it and give it back. That's called victory. And the victor gets to set, not all the terms, but as Germany found out, a lot of the terms. So, okay, those are the rules. Those are the rules not of international law, but of life. The winner gets us at the terms. Again, not all the terms, but he gets more say than the loser does, and Ukraine is the loser. Now, I feel sorry for Ukraine. I feel sorry for Ukrainians, who, like many populations around the world, have learned the hard lesson, which is you follow the kind of fickle and mercurial dictates of the US government, and you get killed, and nobody kind of runs to the rescue. You know, when Muammar Gaddafi, who was a bad guy I I'm not from Gaddafi, but when he followed directions and gave up his weapons of mass destruction, we sent NATO in to kill him. Okay. So, anyway, I feel sorry for the Ukrainians, but the truth is Zelensky, who I think is a legitimately bad person, but even if I even if I loved him, it doesn't matter. He doesn't get to set the terms because he didn't win. And unless you start there, you're not gonna reach an outcome short of nuclear war. Period. So you have to start this. So what would to say Speaker 0: What would Trump do then? Speaker 1: I have no idea what Trump will do. I hope that he listens to his own instincts. I hope that the guiding, this is what I really hope, and for your leaders too in Europe. Let's start with what could happen. Let's assess the risk first. This is how I spend my money. It's how I invest my money. It's how I try to live my life. Start with the downside. What if if things went totally wrong, what would it look like? And in this case, the earth's civilization earth's population would be killed. Billions of people would die. Speaker 0: But but with with this argument So Speaker 1: we're not doing that. Let's just talk to we're not doing that. Anybody Mister Speaker 0: Khazes. This argument, you could also say, okay, next country is the Baltics. The next one is Poland, and then Germany comes. And we could all say, okay, Russia won. We give you everything. I mean, this argument Okay. Speaker 1: So okay. But let's okay. Let's just be rational just for one second. I know Putin's bad, Lindsay's good. No. And Let just Speaker 0: to explain. So if if if it's a threat that, for example, Putin would say, nuke you, what would mean, okay, we give you all the land, then it means that it's also it's not only Ukraine. It would be all the countries. It's So I mean, this argument is Speaker 1: very frustrating, and I agree. Let me just agree with you for the first time in this conversation by saying frustrating to have to acknowledge that the people with the biggest weapons have more power than those without big weapons. Russia has more weapons than Latvia. Therefore, in real life Latvia's and with NATO. Right. NATO. Right. I get it. But I'm just saying, I I don't want Russia to invade any country, including Ukraine. I was against that. I didn't think it would happen, by the way. Was completely wrong. I went on television. I was like, oh, Putin will never do that. Well, then he did it, like, two days later. He made me a quick idiot, which I was. But I don't want that to happen again. I personally don't think they want Latvia. I don't think it's worth the trouble. They can barely control their own country. It's the largest country in the world. They have a massive muscle. Speaker 0: Maybe you do the same mistake as before Ukraine. Speaker 1: I could be completely wrong. I've been wrong many times. But what I'm not wrong about is that the consequence of this going south is nuclear war. And nothing is worse than that, including taking Latvia, including taking Germany, including taking The United States, none of which I think is gonna happen. But if it does, it's terrible. It's not as bad as a nuclear war. So let's start there. And anybody who can't say that out loud, your absurd leaders in Europe. Speaker 0: So your so your argument would be just to understand it right, So your argument would be if there would be the risk of Russia nuking Germany, Latvia, whatever country in NATO, we should just say, okay, Putin, you love Dresden. Here's Dresden, and maybe parts of Berlin, we give it to you. Speaker 1: It's so funny that you've bought that lie. Speaker 0: Which lie? Speaker 1: The lie that Russia has designs on Germany or The UK. That's literally the last thing. There's no Speaker 0: evidence of that lie. Your argument and Speaker 1: It's not look. The truth is they're a million I just realized I'm wearing German shoes. Speaker 0: Oh, throw them away quickly. I I I literally wearing Perkenstock. Speaker 1: I I did that as a gesture of perspective. Alright. I didn't know this was be on camera, which is why I'm dressed so ludicrously. There there are a lot of steps between here and there. All I'm saying is Russia won this particular war. You don't want the war to metastasize. You want to get out if you're a pro Ukraine, which I I'm not against Ukraine, personally. You wanna get out with minimal losses in Ukraine, both to population and enough territory. And so start let's work on the deal now. Let's work on the deal. How do we get out with as little damage, disruption to everybody? Germany, Ukraine, United States, Russia too. How do we get out with this little damage as possible? That's called a negotiation. What you don't wanna do is torque up the rhetoric and the fear dealing with paranoid Eastern Europeans, and they're all paranoid. With love. Speaker 0: Putin doesn't want to negotiate. I was in Istanbul when he was sending some, I don't know, whatever minister. Well, it looked like Speaker 1: And you guys don't believe anything. Well German Speaker 0: I was there. Speaker 1: Then why was he dealing with Steve Wittkoff the other day? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, I was there. Speaker 1: What does Putin want? He just wants to take over all of Europe? He's Hitler? Speaker 0: Is that Wait. Let's let's stay no. Wait. Let's stay with the let's stay let's stay with the negotiations. Blew up Speaker 1: the North Stream pipeline. Speaker 0: Let's stay with the negotiations. So I was in Istanbul when there was negotiations happening. So and and Ukraine sent a lot of, like, at least ministers and defense minister and Putin sent people. They were even laughing about in Russia and were saying, look. I mean, this doesn't look like serious negotiations. Speaker 1: Okay. I don't know if they were serious or not. There's a dance that accompanies all negotiations. There was, I think, by all accounts, every account, a potential early settlement six months into this war, as you know, that was stopped by the Biden administration using its cutout Boris Johnson, the former prime minister of The UK in a contemptible dissonance land. And more than a million people died as a result of that. Russia was, I think, I don't never met anyone who disagrees with this, willing to negotiate a settlement. Maybe a settlement Ukraine wouldn't want or NATO Speaker 0: wouldn't You mean in March 2022? Speaker 1: That's exactly what we're talking about. Speaker 0: Yeah. March 2022. That's yeah. The Boris Johnson story and yeah. Speaker 1: That's a real story. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: So look, it's there are plenty of head fakes. There's a lot of lying, a lot of bluffing in any negotiation. I'm willing to sell it for this, but actually my real number's that. I mean, that's where negotiation is. Right? That's where you have diplomats who sit down. Mean, I the Vietnam War, which went on for eleven years, you know, the negotiations were on for years. It's hard, but the option is nuclear war. So you you can't you have to put that on a piece of paper and stick it to your refrigerator so you see it every single morning. If we fail, we all die. Speaker 0: Yeah. But that means we we all should be afraid every day and think about nuclear war. Speaker 1: Well, I don't know if we should be afraid every day. We should be aware of it every day. Speaker 0: But we we we could also be aware that The US and other Speaker 1: What you're doing what you're and you're repeating the company line, and everyone in Germany says the same thing. And again, it keeps them from fomenting a rebellion against their own leaders who are the ones who have actually betrayed them. Come on. But your leaders have screwed you. And mine have screwed me too. So but whatever. You're not alone. The threat of nuclear war is the greatest threat. Period. I mean, there may be other things I don't know about, but that right now is the is the largest demonstrated threat that we face. So we want to always, as much as we want to prevent countries or disincentivize countries from invading their smaller neighbors, I agree with you a 100% there. We don't want that. I don't want Russia to roll into Latvia. I don't what they would do with it, but I don't want that. But we have to remember that it's not as simple. It will never be as simple as just you know, defending this one principle to the exclusion of all other principles or consequences. That's just not how life is. And if you fuck around too much, you could die. So don't. That's the point. Speaker 0: I want to understand again. Not to understand. Yeah. Sorry. Speaker 1: It's funny. Speaker 0: It's not a show. I always I do Speaker 1: love it. I'm just enjoying it. Speaker 0: Maybe maybe I'll Speaker 1: But I feel like you're I feel like you're starting to agree with me. Speaker 0: Not really. But I'm I'm I mean I believe you. I'm trying to understand you, but I'm not agreeing. Let's keep it that way. Speaker 1: Agree that nuclear and war is something we should be afraid of. Speaker 0: Don't understand that. Wait. Wait. No. What I'm not agreeing to is that we should be so afraid that Putin can do whatever he wants. I'm not making that argument. Speaker 1: Well Hardly making that argument. I'm saying acknowledge the limits of your power to determine what Putin does or doesn't do. You're not in charge of what Putin does, actually. Putin's in charge of what Putin does. This is called reality. And so all you can do is provide incentives, provide disincentives, see how they work. But you're not in charge, actually. Speaker 0: That's the point. So I was with our leader you dislike, Friedrich Metz. I was with him in Speaker 1: You dislike? I just have total contempt for what he's doing. Speaker 0: I was with him when he visited Trump in the Oval Office, and you know, they were sitting next to each other and talking, and they also talked about Ukraine. And since then, it's my feeling, all the leaders, Macron, Stammer, Mertz, Tusk, they all tried to kind of push Trump into a different direction than he was. I mean, like, if we if we see how was was Zelensky in the Oval Office some months ago. And from their perspective, it looked like it worked. Would you agree on that? Speaker 1: I don't know. I can't really assess it. I just can't get past I just wanna ask you a quick question since I've been doing all the talking. Do you think that here's the sense I get. I get the sense that most Germans most Europeans, but you're Germans, also German. Most Germans are angrier at Putin than they are at their own leaders. Yes. Yes. Speaker 0: Well, it depends. I mean, you have some parts. You could see, for example Speaker 1: all the migrants has made Germany better? Speaker 0: The majority would say no. Okay. Do Putin do that? No. Well, but people wouldn't compare these both things. I think that's they would say in Well, what what does the what does the war in Ukraine have to do with the migration crisis in Germany? Speaker 1: Well, it has nothing to do with it. That's kind of the point I'm making. I think it's essential for adults to create their own hierarchy of concerns. What do I actually care about? So the things I'm told I must care about by the people in charge, and they're telling me that maybe for their own reasons, maybe because they're benefiting from it. And there are things that actually matter to me. How much money do I make? What are my neighbors like? Can my kids get married and have kids? Is the park filled with garbage? Stuff like that. That is a real concern to people. And I think once you start looking at the latter category, not what the TV tells you you have to care about, not what Merx tells you you have care about, but what you actually do care about, you will find that your enemy is not Vladimir Putin. He didn't fill the park with garbage or migrants. Angela Merkel did, and Marx is continuing to do it. And so they're the enemies. They're the ones who have made your life force. That's all I'm saying. And I just wonder if there's anyone in Germany who sees that clearly. Speaker 0: Well, I mean, if you see the success of the AFD, especially in the Eastern part of Germany, I think there's many people who are very upset about what Angela Merkel did in the past. If you see the migration crisis, I think people are upset. But at the same time, I mean, I think people can be upset about several things at the same time. So, I mean, they can be upset about, if they are, about what happened. Speaker 1: Well, I'm living proof. I'm upset about a 100 things. Speaker 0: Yeah. Can feel that. No. Of course. I can feel that. Speaker 1: All I'm saying is the amount of energy proportionally, the amount of public debate in Germany I'm not an expert on I don't speak German. Speaker 0: Well, was a lot of public debate about There's a lot Speaker 1: more public debate about Putin than there is about Syrian refugees. A lot more. And in fact, if you complain too much about Syrian refugees, you can get in trouble, as you know. Like, that's not acceptable. You are not invited to complain about the physical reality of the degradation of your country by immigrants. Germany's been totally it's made a much less attractive, safe, and affluent country because of mass migration. It's obvious as a visitor. You are not invited to say that. If I'm if I say that in a school, in a church, in an office in Germany, people are not like, oh, tell me more. They're like, why are you saying Speaker 0: that? Well, I would say you find a lot already. I mean, you can see that what I what I just mentioned. Speaker 1: I think declared a Nazi party. They tried to make it illegal, or did was that not proven? Speaker 0: Well, it's our so called. So and now there is it's in court right now. Speaker 1: So the people who hate Nazis are using the secret police to make their political opponents illegal? How does that work? No. I hate Nazis. No. It's Or I'm gonna use the government people with guns to make you shut up because I hate Nazis so much. Okay. Speaker 0: You're fucking the most Well, listen. Speaker 1: I've ever seen. That's how much I hate Nazis. Shut up, Speaker 0: or I'll shoot you. So so so we could see many US politicians reacting on that. JD Vance, Marco Rubio. Speaker 1: That is funny, though. Speaker 0: Do you hate Speaker 1: Nazis enough to shoot someone who disagrees with you? Speaker 0: If I hate Nazis enough to shoot them, no. I would never shoot anybody. No. Speaker 1: No. And I'm just saying, like, if you're against Nazis, which I strongly am, then you want to see the maximum amount of political debate, free speech, individual choice, I get to decide who I support. Whether you like it or not, that's what a democracy is. And anyone who's saying, no, you don't. The people you like are a threat to me. I'm gonna ban them. There's Who's on the Nazi side? Speaker 0: There there has been a lot of public debate about what JD Vance said about, you know, public speech in Germany. The world also But Speaker 1: why does it take JD Vance to start the debate in Germany? Why don't people say, hey. Maybe the lesson of the second world war is authoritarianism doesn't work. Maybe we should stop doing it. And maybe if most people don't want migrants in the country, why don't we kick them out? Why can't we have an open debate about this? Why are we forcing Speaker 0: people to Speaker 1: be quiet? Speaker 0: There is an open debate about it. I mean, there Speaker 1: is Well, they're trying to ban the party that talked about it just a little bit. By the way, didn't think AFT talked about it enough. That's the issue. You changed the population of the country, you changed the country. German the Germanic peoples are the dominant peoples of Western Europe. Okay? Most productive in my I'm not just because I'm related to them, but I think they're the most impressive. And they are being replaced from people from somewhere else. Speaker 0: They're not being replaced. That's not true. Speaker 1: Well, of course they're being replaced. If Germany is on track to become majority less German in the next hundred years, I think, unless those numbers are fake. If the current rates if the current German birth rate continues alongside the current inflow of people who are not German, it will not be a majority German country in a hundred years. I think that's right. I mean, you can correct me on the numbers if I'm wrong. If that is true, that is by definition replacement. The people who lived there a hundred years ago are no longer the dominant majority. That's replacement. New people are the dominant majority. That's literally the definition of replacement. And the fact that it makes you so uncomfortable that I'm saying that tells me that it's time to free your mind and just say things that are true regardless. Speaker 0: Well, you've been saying this now 10 times that I'm I'm not uncomfortable. Speaker 1: I'm encouraging you on that. Speaker 0: I came here to listen to you. I mean, like, mean, I Speaker 1: I still want it to be a learning experience. It's not just like Speaker 0: Well, I tried. Speaker 1: To go to the mayor of the world's most dangerous podcaster. It's make it Speaker 0: a kind of Yeah. Speaker 1: I know Socrates and Aristotle movie. Speaker 0: But but, I mean, we did that in in in terms of Russia and Ukraine, I think. I mean, that was very interesting to understand. Speaker 1: Ukraine is interesting and important to the extent that we're risking the extermination of humanity with a global nuclear war. Okay? That's why it's interesting. I have a bunch of other non interesting views on it. Okay? That and not even we're talking about, just like my preferences or whatever. They're probably dumb. And you probably don't agree. So doesn't matter. But the big questions do matter. Do we have a nuclear war? Is Germany majority non German in a hundred years? How is that not a big question? And I'm saying the biggest questions are not only ignored, they're discouraged. You are not encouraged to ask the questions that actually matter. Will Germany be majority German in the next hundred years? And people would say, what does it mean to be majority German? I don't know. Your ancestors lived here five hundred years ago or five thousand years ago. You're the indigenous population. Are you being replaced? Shut up. You can't use the word replacement. I can say whatever I want, actually, because I'm a free man, not your slave. And I want you to answer the question. Why is that not important? I think it is demonstrably important. And by the way, if it were happening in Fiji or Malaysia or China or India, I would say the same thing. Well, I just Why destroy a people? Yeah. I don't Speaker 0: But but but but you said that there is not enough discussion about migration policy. They tried Speaker 1: to ban AFD for talking about it. Speaker 0: No. They're not. They're extremists. Speaker 1: This is a democracy. Speaker 0: They're not they're not banning them. This is not true. Well, they're in court because there is the, a German The Enforscht. Yeah. And so they researched or investigated and said, you know, like, that the AFD is a right fascist party, like we could say that, right? Fascist party? Speaker 1: What does it mean to Speaker 0: be fascist? Well, it means from their perspective, is people inside the AFD who said this or who said that, you know, there's a way What does to Speaker 1: document this mean? What's the definition of a fact? Speaker 0: Well, they're saying that it's against German law, what they said, you know, in terms of the right wing. There's different examples of public speeches, what they said inside, but this doesn't mean that they are banning them. You know? Banning them means What it means Speaker 1: you just admitted. What it means is you're not allowed to say certain things. You're not allowed to have certain opinions in Germany. They're illegal. They're against German law. You just said that. And that tells me conclusively that you do not live in a democracy no matter what you tell yourself. It's democracy. We we elect people, lawmakers. We've got our chancellor. It's not a democracy unless the average person, the average citizen, the average German can say what he thinks. If he's not allowed to say what he thinks, then he has no power. He has only fake power. If you can't say what you really think, what really matters to you, what you actually believe, whether I agree with it or not, then you are not a citizen. You are a slave. No different than German citizens were slaves at other periods in German history. And I'm just saying, it's important if you're gonna pretend to be a democracy to actually be one. That's all I'm saying. Don't you agree with that? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, there is laws. There is, you know Speaker 1: But the laws themselves are illegitimate, and they give lie to the claim that you're a democracy. If if the ruling Well if the ruling party can pass laws banning criticism of the ruling party, How is that better than Putin's Russia? It's not. And the one way that Putin's Russia is better is that people in Russia really like Russia, actually. And people in Germany will never say I love Germany. Speaker 0: Oh, there's many people saying that. They'll say love Germany. Speaker 1: Really proud of my German heritage. I've never heard I hope I hope every German feels over it because you have so much to be proud of. Take out the Nazi period, I think you can be really proud of what Germany has given to the world. Maybe more than any other country, actually. In fact Yeah. Speaker 0: But but be because what happened in the Nazi period, I mean, there is our history, you know, we we we still have to deal with our history. We shouldn't forget about it. And because what yeah, but because of what happened in our history with the NSDRP coming up, with the Nazi party coming up, there is laws in Germany, and our idea is that what happened in 1933 should never happen again. Speaker 1: I agree. Strongly agree. Speaker 0: That's the reason why a so called Faufassen schutz is Speaker 1: yeah. Mean, look, this is not my business, but just as like a historical matter, I think that Speaker 0: I mean, I I want to say something very clear. I think it's a total wrong idea to ban the AFD. I'm totally against it, you know, because I I agree that, you know, I mean, you can't ban a party where 23% or 25% of the people, you know, voting for. Speaker 1: You can't ban a party one tenth of 1%. You can't ban parties. You can't ban ideas. You have to outcompete them. If my idea is wrong, tell me how. You have to treat me like a human being, not a slave. Tell me how it's wrong. Convince me it's wrong. Show me. Offer me incentives. But you can't force me. And if you force me by the way, doesn't work. As you just said, it doesn't work. Part of the reason that someone as grotesque as Hitler was able to take power in a country as advanced as Germany was because the German people were totally degraded by the settlement after World War one. You know this. And their land was stripped, and they had foreign troops. They sent African troops, as you know, to degrade the Germans. And the Germans hated that, and I understand why. And, unfortunately, their hate and resentment built to the point where they elected elected Hitler. That's the actual lesson of it. And I say that as someone who's very anti Hitler. Speaker 0: Well, but that would like, that sounds like there's not a German fault. I mean, that sounds like the something happened before. I'm not it's Speaker 1: not but I'm not of course, it's the Germans' fault for electing Hitler. I'm not this is, again, the the childish level of discussion about everything that has led us to the brink of nuclear war and the destruction of Western Europe, is that no one can have an honest conversation. Speaker 0: Well, we have that, I think. Speaker 1: I'm trying. So, no, I'm not I'm not stripping the Germans of their war guilt. They have war guilt. I get it. I'm just saying, how did the war start in the first place? How did they elect Hitler in the first place? Why would a country and and I often learned this as a child. Like, the shocking thing about the Nazi party was it happened in Germany. And so many of the Jewish refugees who came to The United States from Germany were, like, the most impressive people. And I remember reading stuff they were there, like, can't believe this happened in Germany. I served in the first World War. I love Germany. I'm German. I was this famous scientist. I had to move to New York. Like, it's a very familiar thing. Right? The whole point was it happened in a country as evolved as Germany, the most evolved country. How did that happen? Nobody asks, and it's important to know because you don't want it to happen again. And I know that there are many causes of this and every other historical event, but one of the ways that it happened was more than a decade of degradation convinced the people they had no option but to do something radical and crazy like elect Hitler, a non German to run their country. That's all I'm saying. And so I'm just saying there's a long term cost degrading people and not allowing them to say what they think. And one of the costs is they can become super radical and crazy if you keep it up. Super radical and crazy. And I'm not saying that's gonna happen in Germany. I'm just saying that happens with people. You know what I mean? You have to treat them like human beings. You can't ban their parties. Speaker 0: What I don't understand, if we talk about The US right now and what their focus because, I mean, I'm more foreign policy expert or crisis, you know, I'm I'm more out of Germany, so I like to talk about Ukraine and Israel and and Iran. Speaker 1: What happened to the darn shoot quite well? Speaker 0: So Yeah. Stuff like that as well. Speaker 1: Heard of this. Speaker 0: So I I would be really interested to understand because you talk to a lot of people, not only Trump, but also to JD Vance, to many others. Speaker 1: She did everybody. To everybody, which is great. Absolutely. So It's not considered great. It's considered naughty and funny. Speaker 0: Really? In The US? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. I mean, I don't care. I'm kind of off the Internet at this point. I don't ever read criticism or praise. Speaker 0: You're off the Internet? Speaker 1: Well, I'm not. You can't be off the Internet, but I really try not to go on social media. You know, you try to I try to be I try to get my information from people because I think it's better. But there's a lot of pressure in The United States, and it's overwhelming in Germany as well, and and throughout Europe, to not talk to people you disagree with, or who are bad. And I just feel like that is not the way to knowledge or wisdom. You wanna talk to as many people as you can. Speaker 0: I totally agree on that. So talking about JD Vance, do you think he agrees on what Trump is doing in terms of Putin, in terms of Iran? Speaker 1: You know, I don't I don't strictly speaking know the answer, so I can't give it. I'll just make a couple obvious points. I love JD Vans. He's a really decent man. He's very smart in a true sense, not in a glib, fast old, fake politician sense where you can, like, allied past the question and bullshit you into moving on to the next question. He's not that guy. He's, like, a genuinely reflective deep person with a lot of wisdom for a man as young as he is. So I I I really admire JD Vance. He's the vice president of The United States. So at this point, it doesn't kinda matter. Just the way I don't know if how much you know about how our government is structured, but the vice president receives as many votes as the president. So he has the the legitimacy, the moral legitimacy of the president. He has the people's expressed will backing him up. Democracy is working. But he does not have constitutionally the authority to make any decisions at all, like, really any, and certainly not on foreign policy. It's the commander in chief. It's the executive. It's the one guy. It's the president who makes those decisions, and he makes them, you know, constitutionally. Under our constitution, he makes them unilaterally. The president says this. We're doing it. The military is to follow him. Speaker 0: You know you know him very well, but how how does he take this decision, Trump, in terms of Iran bombing the facilities, in terms of Ukraine, Putin giving this ultimatum fifty days? Who are the people around him you think convince him to do this or to do that? Speaker 1: Well, I've said this publicly. And and, of course, I I would begin with the caveat that I I don't work there. I can't know Speaker 0: But you know people. Speaker 1: Everything. Well, I can't know most things, and I don't. But my my strong impression is that the president listens to a lot of people on every topic, which I like about him very much. But I think on foreign policy questions, particularly recently, do we use force against this or that Muslim country? I think the pressure to do that or the voices trying to convince them to do that are coming from outside of the administration. I think that's true. That's my impression. Speaker 0: Who's outside? What do you mean? Speaker 1: People he knows, people he's in touch with, talk show hosts. I mean, I actually, at one point, produced a list Speaker 0: Sean Hannity? Speaker 1: People I thought, oh, I I like Sean Hannity. I'm not talking Sean Hannity. But but it clearly Sean has different foreign policy views. I know that he that from mine, for sure, and it speaks to the president a lot, but not just him, other people the president knows, and donors, and Ike Perlmutter, and, you know, whatever. Rupert Murdoch has been a consistent voice urging more military action against this, that, or another country. And I think, you know, I don't I don't really understand that. But I know that he is calling the president multiple times multiple, multiple, multiple times a week to urge To attack Yeah. More people in some other country because for whatever reason. Speaker 0: When did that happen? Recently? Or when you were That's ongoing Speaker 1: as far as I know. I think Rupert Murdoch has been one of the most aggressive voices in the president's ear. There are lots of voices in the president's ear. It doesn't mean he's taking orders from Murdoch. But I all I'm saying is there's a chorus of people, this is true in every administration, weighing in on behalf of, you know, their own views or some constituency. President should do this, and they speak to his advisers, and in some cases, speak directly to him. And I do think, to his credit, Trump speaks to a broader a palette of people than most presidents. I've never known I've known a lot of presidents. I've never seen one take as much advice, counsel from as many different people. And I I think that's good, actually, in general. But because it it gives you perspective of what's happening outside the White House. You're very cut off from the world. Any president is. But my impression is that the push toward war in Russia and in The Middle East has come mostly from outside the White House. Know, normally, it's like the national security adviser is insane, and he wants to bomb this or that group. I don't know if that's true. I could be wrong, but that's my my impression. Speaker 0: Where does J. D. Vance stand? Speaker 1: J. D. Vance is the vice president, and I I'm look. There's always this terrible tension between president and vice president, especially a president who's in his final term as this president is, where, you know, the vice president's always tempted to act in the service of his own political ambitions and undermine the president. J. D. Vance has not done that at all, like, at all. At all. And everything the president has said, the vice president has said, I support that. What can I do to help you? So that's been I mean, Trump is blessed to have a vice president like that from my perspective. I do think though, it's not about Trump or JD Vance, but The United States have has fought a lot of wars since 1945, dozens and dozens and dozens, all of them undeclared, most of them small. And I can't think of any, and maybe I'm missing something, that have made The United States better off, that have helped the American people, that have made the country richer, that have made the country more cohesive, which is one of the main goals of leadership is to bring cohesion. Keep we want people to get along in the way that you want your children to get along. This country is less cohesive than it's ever been. And I think the cycle has accelerated in the last ten years. And as our country declines, it becomes poorer and more at war with itself. I think we have become more aggressive outside of our borders. And I do see a connection between the two. I don't fully understand it. And I'll just stop at this. I think it has to do with what our leaders care about. And it's some of the problems that advanced Western societies face are very complex. There's no obvious answer. Whether they're problems with energy or the way money is distributed, what is your economy? You know, these are the basic questions that any society faces, and they're hard to they're hard to fix these problems. What do you do about the millions of people from other countries living in your country who aren't assimilating, and population was born here is mad. They're mad. Like, how do you fix that? It's hard. I mean, I will give them credit. It's hard. And so there is a temptation to spend your time on problems that you think you can solve, and almost all of those are outside your borders. And so I certainly noticed this with Mertz and with you, frankly, no offense, but also with our journalists here in The United States and our lawmakers here. They're so focused on Ukraine, for example. There's a good guy versus a bad guy, and let's make this right. And I think there's a lot of good faith behind that. Like, I'm I'm not attacking them. I understand why they feel that way. It's a lot easier to spend your time on something you think can actually work, to take the side of a group you think is actually good, because you don't know that much about them. You don't speak the language. You're not from there. So it's easy to imagine they're really good, and their opponents are really bad. When in truth, the reality is always much more complex, but you don't know that because you're not from there. And in the process, ignore the things you're actually responsible for, which is the condition of your own country and your own people. I do think that's what's happening in The United States. I know it's happening in Europe because it's easy to see it from the distance. And I think that if that continues, there will be revolutions in these countries because the people of these countries have been really mistreated by their leaders, really mistreated. I think the people of Europe have been far more mistreated by their own leaders than they ever have been by Putin. And when they realize that, I I worry about Europe. Speaker 0: Will J. D. Vance be the next president after Trump? Speaker 1: Gosh. I sure hope so. I do. I do you know, I don't know everything that I'm not an adviser to JD Vance, but Speaker 0: I wanna say that. When did you talk to him the last time? Speaker 1: Oh, years ago. I've never met him. Speaker 0: Really? Speaker 1: I just wanna be clear. I've never no. I of course, I've met JD Vance. But I think, you know, I unlike JD Vance, I don't have a political future ahead of me. I don't work for anybody. I can say whatever I want. My children are grown. There are no restrictions on on my ability to say what I think is true. And so as a result of that, I'm considered wildly controversial. Speaker 0: But but if you're so Speaker 1: concerned want As I mister Kozlov, as be used to hurt JD Bank. That's all I'm saying. Speaker 0: But if you're so concerned, as you are, and I I can feel it and and, you know, how you see the problems and from your perspective in The US, in Europe, but also in the world. So why are you not considering running? I understand I Speaker 1: I don't think I I'm doing what I think God made me to do, which is just to talk. I have no power. I don't want any power. I just sit in a chair and or another thing. I'm just like another middle aged guy with an opinion, but we happen to have cameras in my barn so other people can hear my opinion. That is what I was made for. It's what I've always done. And one of the reasons I'm happy is because I recognize I just keep going back to this, but I recognize my own limits. Would you have a chance Speaker 0: if you run? There's people saying that I'm Speaker 1: gonna run. Speaker 0: But if you would Speaker 1: run have to show up on my house and tell me to run, in which case I would. I don't think it's gonna happen. Speaker 0: So anything what could happen that you run? Speaker 1: No. I mean, I don't want to run. I'm not suited for it. And I have a happy life because I don't imagine that some entirely different career awaits me, or I really should be doing something else. If I thought I should be doing something else, I'd be doing it. I'm doing exactly what I like doing, what I think I'm made to do, what I'm decent at doing, what I've always done. Don't feel like, oh, man, I I really I really wanna be a fireman or a senator from Arkansas. You know, I don't want that. I don't think you know what I mean? I hope you feel it that's the greatest blessing, is to feel hap I like my wife. I like where I live. I like my dogs. I like my kids. I'm, like, pretty happy with everything. I don't feel like, shit, I wish I had a plane. I really need a plane or whatever. I need a country or if only I could like bomb Syria, you know, that would like make me feel whole. I'd forget my own impotence if I bombed Syria. You know, I don't I don't feel that way. Speaker 0: But it could be that, I mean, that you get so upset about things Speaker 1: Oh, Speaker 0: I'm you feel like you wanna not only talk about, but you wanna change things. Speaker 1: Well, that's what they all convince themselves. I wanna be a player. I wanna be in charge. And I think I was really blessed at a very young age, like in high school, because of because of my father, who lived in DC. You know, I was around a lot of that. You know what I mean? I mean, I I had lunch at the White House in high school. And I'm not bragging. I'm just the opposite. It's like the more you're around that stuff, you realize it's just people doing their best, and some cases not doing their best, but it's not anything magic. And I don't think I'm just not that impressed by power. I think that's my great advantage in life is I've been around it a lot. And I've been around it so much that I don't have any illusions about it. I'm not impressed by it at all. I don't hate everyone with power, but I certainly am not gonna kiss their ass. I don't think they're Jesus. So I think they're Jesus. I disagree. Speaker 0: So if it's if you're not running, and maybe JD Vance is running. But right now JD Vance is running. But right now, it looks like the MAGA movement is kind of divided in terms of foreign policy, what to do, but also internal stuff. We haven't talked about Epstein. And the Epstein case. Speaker 1: Epstein. Epstein? Why? Because I love the German pronunciation. Speaker 0: Epstein. Speaker 1: Is that how it's Yeah. I didn't know him. Thank heaven. Speaker 0: So what is going on inside the MAGA movement right now? Speaker 1: Oh, boy. I have no idea. What we do know is there was this guy who got indicted twice, convicted once of sex crimes, and he was a sex weirdo. Lots of those. I worked in television. I know quite a few. So we know that. What we don't know is what was he doing, and how did he get hundreds of millions of dollars? He didn't apparently execute any trades on Wall Street. He was not a trader. Didn't work on Wall Street. So where'd the money come from? What was the point of this? And he he had heads of state and high level political leaders in his house all the time. And there were six involved. And there were a lot of allegations, which may or may not be true. I can't I can't assess that, about what he was doing and why, and we don't have answers on that. And I think we know enough that people are insistent on on getting answers. And and then there's a question of how did he die? It's pretty clear he did not kill himself. Speaker 0: You think do you think Trump is nervous about it? We can see his tweets and his Speaker 1: I don't know. I I can't I can't say, but I can say that normal people, non crazy people have a great desire to know these answers, and I think have an expectation that they're due these answers. It's their right to know. Their government was involved. And I also think bigger than that, and this is something that maybe not everyone at the White House understands, though I think they will. It's a metaphor. It represents something bigger than it is. Like, I I personally don't think, you know, the the fate of nations rises or falls on the questions of Jeffrey Epstein. I just don't. K? But I do think the fate of nations rises and falls on the question of who's really in charge, who's making these decisions, and why. Like, that is the fate of nations, that question. Right? So there is a widespread belief in The United States, and it's true. It's rooted in rooted in reality that a lot of this is fake. Like, it's an illusion. Like, why can't we know? In our system, the people rule. We have a representative democracy in which we elect people to work on our behalf, but it's our behalf. They're working on it. They work for us. We own this country. We're shareholders. We're not just passing through. We're not renting it. We own it. That's the American system. And so if you can't get a straight answer from your government about what the government's doing, and there's clearly no national national security implications. Shut up. Some pedophile that well, how is that a national security question? It's not. Then you start to wonder, like, what the hell is this? Who's running it? And Donald Trump ran for president on the promise that he would tell us, and that he would end corruption in Washington. Now that's a big promise. Every large organization is corrupt by its nature. DC is the largest organization. Therefore, it's the most corrupt. That's just a fact. So can one man fix that? No. But you have to make a good faith effort. And so people understood that when Trump got there, and they voted for him for this reason, that they would learn what their government was doing. Not just about Epstein, and not just about JFK, or RFK, or MLK, or the historic murders that are still unsolved, but about, like, where does all the money go? Why is the Pentagon getting a trillion dollars? Where does that money go exactly? So Trump supporters disappointed? I don't know. Trump's look. I I I think my impression is that I'm trying to be diplomatic here. Speaker 0: Yeah. I can feel that. Speaker 1: I'm trying because this is I mean, I'm Speaker 0: Well, with Trump, you're diplomatic. With the other topics, not that much. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's true. Because I know Trump. Speaker 0: So you would get furious if you're non diplomatic? Speaker 1: I don't care about that or I wouldn't be talking to you in the first place. I'm not afraid of anybody, and I don't owe Trump anything, of course. But, no. I I know him well enough to know that and have known him for so long. And I've talked to him so much that I I know that he agrees fundamentally with the idea that the system is corrupt, and the way that it continues to be corrupt is through secrecy. And that you have to air the stuff. You have to tell people what's going on and take the hit, and that's okay. You know, we all we all screw up. There are things about me I seek to hide. Love pizza. Or whatever, you know? And and that's okay, but you have to be honest at a certain point or it doesn't get better. That's just kind of a basic human principle. And and I know that Trump agrees with that. And so I if I'm being cagey or I don't mean to be cagey, I don't really understand what the hell is going on, if I'm being honest. I really don't. And I haven't talked to him about it. I have called over there and asked, what the hell is going on? I don't understand this. By the way, I don't think Trump had anything to do with Epstein. He knew Epstein, but I would be sincerely shocked if Trump there was some weird sex stuff with Trump. I just don't believe that. I've talked to Speaker 0: Trump about it. I know him well. What did he say? Speaker 1: He said I think he said this publicly. He said Epstein was always in Mar A Lago, freeloading, and, you know, hitting on the massage therapist, and he kicked him out. Speaker 0: And Does this sound realistic to you? Speaker 1: It does. Whatever Trump sends, I have never gotten, like, a creepy vibe off him at all. And you ask any woman who's been around him. I was just asking one who's standing right there and knows him, you forget the creepy vibe? Because white women know. They get the creepy vibe way better than men do, or at least that I do. And I've asked women, do you get a creepy vibe off Trump? You could smell it if someone's got weird sex shit going on underneath the surface. I can smell it instantly. I don't know what you're into, but it's freaky. Speaker 0: I know that. I'm Speaker 1: not pointing that at you. I've never gotten that vibe off Trump at all. And everyone I've ever asked, didn't you say you didn't get that at all? Right. So I could be completely wrong, but I would be shocked. And by the way, this information, if it exists, would have been on the hands of the Biden administration during the last presidential campaign. You think they wouldn't have leaked Trump, whatever weird stuff? I don't think I don't think that's it. I really don't. Again, could be wrong, but I just don't believe it. And so what what is this? And I don't really know. I mean, my sense is that you do get in a vacuum when you're at the top of whatever pyramid. And I don't think they fully understand how this is being read on the outside. But we're a few days into this. You know, get back to me in a month, and I I have a better sense. We all have a better sense of what this is. But I think it's a big deal. I guess that's what I'm saying. Not because of Epstein, but because of what he represents. Speaker 0: So it's Epstein, it's Iran, it's Russia, Ukraine. What kind of shifts the MAGA movement? Or Speaker 1: Well, look, I mean, in The United States, people voted for Trump, not all, of course, but a lot of people voted for Trump with the sense that he's the only one who cares. So our country has and you don't get this sense if you don't live here, but if you really if you travel the country and you look carefully at the numbers, letting people not having children, they're they're literally being replaced by immigrants, they can't afford anything. I mean, it's it's economically, parts of this country are much poorer than they were when I was a child. And so there's a feeling of abandonment and and anger, well dis justified anger. And those are Trump voters, for sure. You drive around here, you see a lot of Trump signs. That's the reason. The higher your death rate from opioids, I think this is true. You can check it. The higher the rate of vote for Donald Trump. So Trump got the vote of people who feel abandoned, and they have been abandoned, and it's provable. No one cares about them at all. What do they think of 25,000 Somalis moving into their town? Nobody asks them. Nobody cares. Just wrecked their lives, wrecked their schools, wrecked their hospitals, destroyed their community, and no one asks them what they think. Shut up, racist. That's the answer they get. How do you think they feel about that? How do think the Germans that's had that too feel? They feel angry. And they're like, I'm gonna vote for AFD. Oh, it's banned. It's a Nazi party. It's not banned. They're in court because they had naughty opinions about how they were treated by their own fucking leadership. Speaker 0: I'm just saying. Speaker 1: They're not banned. Yeah. What's happening in Western Europe I'm I'm being mean to Germany, a country I really Speaker 0: It's okay. Speaker 1: Well, you guys love it when people are mean to you. Smack me harder, daddy. Oh, I'm sorry. Excuse me. That's so mean. But true. But anyway, that's Trump's base here. It's the same dynamic. It's people who've been abandoned by larger forces, geoeconomic forces. It's not all, like, bad people made mean decisions, but they didn't protect their people. Okay? And those people are upset, and Trump is the expression of how upset they are. And he's really their last hope. And and they like him. He's very likable. You know? He I like him, so I can tell you that And firsthand. So if Trump doesn't work, if they feel like Trump abandoned them, he's the lie. That's the last train out, man. This is the last political solution to their problems. And so it's a big, big deal. If Trump is and I don't know if this is true, but if he is seen as turning on his own voters who love him, that's profound. And I don't know what the con I hope that's not true, for one thing. I don't know that it is true. But if that is true, that is that's a profound thing. And I don't know what the consequences will be. I hope that's not true. Speaker 0: Mister Carlson, thank you very much for your time. It was very interesting. Speaker 1: I won you over. I know part of you is like, oh, this is forbidden. I can't think this. No. I this is so naughty. Speaker 0: No. Have to I have Speaker 1: say it. Speaker 0: No. I'm sorry. Speaker 1: Well, I tried. Speaker 0: You tried Speaker 1: hard. You Speaker 0: tried hard. Great to see you. Thank you. Great to see you. Thank you very
Saved - August 1, 2025 at 3:21 PM

@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK

Old World Dwarfs.. Are inside of Hitl3rs "Magic Mountain" https://t.co/Mxt5QdHtcz

Video Transcript AI Summary
A mountain on the German-Austrian border is restricted to the public, containing a cave system discovered in 1996 with over 400 caves reaching depths of 1,148 meters. The Nazi regime supposedly built tunnels and bunkers inside, but questions arise whether they found pre-existing structures with domed roofs and valuables. Legends speak of Charlemagne sleeping within, cared for by dwarf-like creatures. The military restricts access, and in 2014, restrictions increased further, allegedly for preservation, though locals suspect concealed activities. A well-known figure was obsessed with the mountain, believing it held mystical power, ancient knowledge, and supernatural ties. In 1987, three German hikers disappeared, reappearing months later on a ship in the Red Sea with no memory of the intervening time. Hikers report time lapses and blackouts. An engineer's account suggests an old world civilization may still reside within. The mountain is linked to missing persons cases, with an absence of publicly accessible records in surrounding towns. The US Army maintained operations at the location from 1945 to 1995.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why would a mountain on the border between Germany and Austria be off limits to the public if it were just a hill? Why would there be an extensive cave system that is home to over 400 known caves reaching depths of 1,148 meters that was all just discovered in 1996. Old world dwarfs inside of a mountain. Are you ready? Who built the caves? Were these caves naturally forming? Of course not. And we know this because we are told that the Nazi regime constructed an elaborate network of tunnels and bunkers inside this mountain. Now I'm gonna ask you, did they build them, or did they find them? Where the tunnels were designed with high domed roofs, wide floors, and there were valuables found inside, where only two entrances to the tunnels have been unsealed and open to the public today. They're still using this place today, and we all know it. What was found inside this mountain? And we found multiple mountains at this point all over the world that have massive cities. They have buildings, and now we find domed roofs inside of a mountain. I told you we were just getting started. Anything and everything needs to be on the table at this point, where there are legends of emperor Charlemagne sleeping within the mountain cared for by dwarf like creatures. What the heck did they find inside this mountain? And what's still there today that we don't know about? Why do these mountains have massive tunnels? They have buildings as we've shown. Who is living inside as we speak? What's going on here in this place that we live? What are we being blocked off from? And why are these massive mountains time and time again restricted to the public by the military? The deepest and largest cave system in Germany where it is largely unexplored. Who is still living inside these mountain complexes? Who's in there? Is it just the military, or is there something much more going on inside? The legend may be more real than what we realize, telling us that there are small, powerful, and otherworldly beings said to live deep inside the mountain, pale skinned, wearing robes or cloaks, and possessing knowledge of time, healing, and energy manipulation. This is everything that we've discussed on this channel, especially in the cathedrals. Is the previous civilization still here where Charlemagne, who supposedly sleeps inside the mountain until the final battle, could still be in there? And I'm not in the business of dismissing things without looking into it. The place is off limits to the public. So I'm going to dig deeper. Why was the military so interested in this mountain? Where not only is it restricted to the public today, but in 02/2014, it became even more restricted than ever before with reports of heightened restrictions all for preservation yet again, where the locals believe that these measures aim to conceal undisclosed activities or discoveries within the mountain, where somebody that we've all heard about was obsessed with this place. Why would he be so obsessed with the mountain? If it was only just a hill, where it was his magic mountain. He called it the Sleeping Dragon and believed that it held mystical power. I wonder why. Did he figure out what was inside that mountain? He believed that the mountain had ties to ancient knowledge and the supernatural, the old world. These figures are depicted on the old world cathedrals. We have seen it all over the world. These are not myths, and they're not just art as we are told. And this is all in my opinion, of course, and you can believe whatever you want as always. I'm never gonna tell anybody what to think. I'm just sharing what I find. Where he said that the mountain held secrets of the past. Inside? This place that we live is so much more than what we're told. The fact that the military was so interested in this location in Germany and still is to this day is telling in itself. And this is when we go even further and find that in 1987, three German hikers went hiking on this mountain where their tent and equipment were found intact perfectly fine. But then the men were all missing. And then they just reappeared three months later on a ship in the middle of the Red Sea that's 2,375 miles away, where even their car was found parked right there at the site with no recollection of the intervening time. By the time that they got back from Egypt, after calling their families from the ship, claiming that they had no recollection of getting there, they, of course, altered their story, saying that they just traveled there. They didn't have a passport, and they didn't have a car, and their tent was still on the mountain. What do you think? I believe that somebody told them to alter their story. It's incredible. And this is not the only time happened. This happens all the time where hikers are constantly reporting, experiencing sudden lapses in time while on the mountain. They're losing track of hours and they're blacking out. And they awaken in entirely different locations, showing up in other countries. And I believe that this is happening so much more than we're being told. Documented account, an engineer, a steel construction technician, and his experience at the mountain, I believe, proves that the old world civilization, they still may be here, and we are just getting started today. Welcome to episode 133 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. What if your coffee didn't just wake you up, but it actually made you feel sharp, focused, and ready for the day? That's the difference with seventeen seventy five's Peaberry coffee. These beans are rare, less than 5% of all grown coffee. They're denser, naturally higher in caffeine, and packed with antioxidants. That means more mental clarity, better energy, and zero crash. Each bean grows solo, high in the Bolivian Mountains, and is handpicked at peak ripeness. The result, a smoother, more concentrated flavor that kick starts your metabolism without acidity or jitters. You're still getting the 1775s organic. Small batch, small farm. Single origin quality. Just with a bean that goes above and beyond. Go to 1775coffee.com slash lunch break and get 15% off right now. This is coffee that actually earned its place in your morning. I wanna thank all of our sponsors over on Patreon. Speaker 1: Thank you to flatearthdave.com. You can check out his app, the flat earth sun, moon, and zodiac app. I'll put the link right in the description, and you can use my referral code MLB. If you click the Tartaria button, you'll see the my lunch break playlist right here. The app is awesome. Thank you to Rebecca Kay, David and Sherry Ferguson, Chuck Templeton, Joy Lee, Stephanie Nolan, the Burlesons, Suez KC, Edwin Rice, Charles Krueger, Dan Woodall, Dale, DJ Click Track, Jacob Law, Jim Ribley, and Christine Duggan, Kyle Glascock, pktfnews.org, Ben Drizano, Natalie Shippenoff, Melissa Edgar, Biggles, Clayton Lamar, Will Task Homestead, John Adams, Speaker 0: Robert Zozolin, the Arnolds, Speaker 1: Attila Power, Forbidden Gecko Love, Justin Grobner Grubb, Leah Strong, Dakota Dunn, eggertshirts.com, Jason Hockburn, Marie c, Michael Dingyu, Patriot Armory, Tom O'Hara, c three c o b, Jeffrey Temple, sonyadane.com, James Alvin, Baqsuey, Jason Press, Suki Warrior, We The People, Migs, Mark Chapman, Muji and Declan, Ariana Oates, Nathan Berbah, Ski, Speaker 0: Beacon of Truth, Liberty's Arborist, Thomas Thorpe Peterson, Zinger Coffee and Tea, evelynmcgregor.com, Emily Maryland, Curious Cat, Mike D, etcetera, Dan McGee, Laurie Hedvig Johnson, Ellie Annie, Seth Crago, Glenn Gunderson, Mousey's Mouse Cheese Records, Robert's Brain Is Gone, Extreme Reality Check, Late For Dinner, Iolo Goncalves, Blake, Rick Tapke, William Richard Jeffries the Dax, Bill Jack and Son, Dylan Mugenburg, Leonard Insulaco, Robert Petro, Cats Hill, Susie q, Yark one forty three, Sven Eric, Carrie, Kitty Kitties, GOL, m Patriot, Doc Halo, Kenneth Putt, Brenna Fernandez, Paraduction, Necrodemonics, A and W Kerrigan, Tim Skin, Rod Wah, Quidest of Peas, Corbin Mechanical, Buck, VKH Bonner, Breaking Bigfoot, Rideon and the Residuals, Road Warrior, Bruce Latour, Anna Marley and Nunzio, Codreth, David and Irene, Al Pizano, Ivan Apocaly, Ardra Rogers, Brazawian, Harmon Walker, Ivan Apocaly, Papa One, Kinda Classy, Kinda Chola, Maybell, Winnie Set a Compass Upon the Face of the Death, Laurel L. Burnett, Poppy Johns, DJ Sofa King and Jen Hollywood, Summer Chambers, Dee Woods, John and Carlo, Timber Traveler, Bill, Vince Moreno, Lucy, Tibba Shaba in the darkness. You guys are all awesome and helping this channel out a lot. Wolfgang Stadler, an engineer. He wrote books about his experiences at the mountain. He described encounters with individuals residing within the mountain. People that still think that they're in World War two. This is still going on. They're under some sort of trance, and they're oblivious to the passage of time, showing no sign of aging despite the significant time that's passed. Now if this place is off limits to the public, how did he get to go in the mountain, and how was he allowed to tell these stories? Wolfgang Stadler was a trained steel construction technician and very likely could have been given government contracts or infrastructure surveys. And then he writes these books under the name of Stan Wolfe, where he presents the information as fictional, avoiding legal issues. His book, Gems of Dominion, was published in 02/2009. Now all of this being said, I have no idea if there are actually things inside this mountain or other mountains all over the world. What I do know is that this place is off limits to the public. We can't just go walking around and go inside the complex. It is off limits. We know that military explorations were conducted within the last one hundred years. We also know that a well known figure stated that this mountain is a sleeping dragon holding mystical power and holds secrets of the past with documented accounts of him referencing Charlemagne, the dwarves, and the time anomalies. He believed that the mountain had ties to ancient knowledge and the supernatural. This is the old world. If militaries are restricting sites, if governments all over the world are extremely interested, and time and time again showing us that these are valuable locations for our research, then why in the world would we be dismissing it? They still do not allow us in these sites today. If there are small powerful beings living deep inside the mountain, described as pale skinned and robed, holding old world knowledge, old world healing powers, understanding energy manipulation. If these individuals are really here, I wanna know about it. I'm not gonna be dismissing things just because I've never seen it before or never heard about it in history one zero one. I wanna know the truth, and that starts with asking questions. And that's what we've been doing all along, and I believe there are massive facts in play here. There is something going on in this location that makes me really wonder about other locations that we've already looked into, such as Raven Rock, the Chey Mountain Complex, or even the Hoover Dam. What old world technology has been found? What is really going on inside these mountains? And we see the same thing going on in Iran, where we know that they have mountains too and things going on inside of them. And we also know that that place, it has been in the news lately, where we are told that this location, they have elaborate networks of tunnels, high domed roofs, and wide floors. What's going on in there? Especially when we see that somebody built their so called eagle's nest directly across from this mountain just six miles away. He set up his eagle's nest, his mountain residence. You can visit this location today. They even have a restaurant, and it's a tourist attraction. And I'm guessing there are tunnels under there that connect six miles away, and it wouldn't shock me at all. Visitors can tour the pumping hall, and, of course, some tunnels. Some tunnels. Some. Meaning, that there are more. And you're not gonna get in the one that leads to the Magic Mountain, but we all know that it's there. It has to be. Access to the eagle's nest is achieved via mountain road, featuring five tunnels, a 124 meter long tunnel leading to a brass lined elevator that a sense of the building itself. Again, was all of this built or was all of this found? Telling us that all of this was completed in just one year. Crazy. From 1937 to 1938. Are you sure? So called Magic Mountain, according to a German FOIA request, is restricted to the public. You can't go in there, and there are even recorded denials of SAR imaging. Denials coming from German Austrian authorities after 02/2014. Was this 2014 incident a real event, or was it a stunt to restrict it even further to the public than what it was before to restrict the use of satellite radar mapping? The use of satellite radar mapping have been blocked all for environmental and historical preservation. Preservation, conservation, protection. Three words that restrict the public from do we're that. We're let's take a minute and thank all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber. I appreciate all of you. It's awesome watching this community get bigger and bigger every single day. We are on YouTube. We're on Rumble. We're on x. Instagram, TikTok, and Spotify if you're looking for even more content from us. And thank you for liking the episodes as well. This helps push the episodes to brand new people that have never heard about this mountain and didn't know that German hikers were on this mountain camping, car parked, and then without a passport, showed up 2,000 miles away from this in a boat and had no idea how they got there in 1987. You are allowed to go in this mountain in some areas, which I definitely wanna do one day. But most of over the 400 caves in this mountain are effectively off limits to the general public. Blocking these caves off due to historical significance or undisclosed activities. Undisclosed activities? Other sections just have barriers and just blocks us off without any explanation at all. And other sections are blocked off as water protection zones or plant conservation regions. I do believe that there is something crazy going on inside this mountain. I believe it's been going on for so much longer than we're all told, and this next part is the clearest giveaway of all. It proves in my opinion that we are correct and that there is something going on in this location. It proves that something has been going on here for a very long time. There is an absence of publicly accessible records detailing the annual missing persons cases in Groddig, Austria, and Brichtestigen, the two towns that surround this mountain. These two towns, they mountain. Why? Let's go further. In 2017, Austria reported 10,000 missing people. In Germany, they noted that 1,600 missing minors in 02/2021. So these countries, they know how to do it. They know how to document these things. Why do they both agree and they both choose not to report the missing people in this location? We know that in 1987, hikers disappeared and then reappeared on a boat thousands of miles away, then told to change their story. Do you think that that was the only time this ever happened? It was documented in contemporary newspapers, but never acknowledged by official public case files. Why not? They deny SAR. So what is going on inside this mountain? I wanna know. It's such a weird thing to do in a tourist heavy area near a location that has seen disappearances in the past. What is going on here? What's going on inside this mountain? Are these legends true? And why was the US Army establishing a significant presence in 1945? Why was the US Army repurposing this location? Why did they maintain operations until 1995 spanning over fifty years? What did they do? What do they know now? And what did they destroy other than their facility cornerstone in 2000 to 02/2001? Do you think you know everything about this place that we live? I believe that we are just getting started, and I believe we are not being told the truth. Not one bit.
Saved - August 9, 2025 at 8:40 PM

@DerWulf - 🅆🅄🄻🄵

https://t.co/OVLeAEW6Nc

Saved - September 27, 2025 at 3:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on a Syrian refugee named Ahmad living near Hamburg. He has two wives and six children, is illiterate, and prefers not to work or learn German. Ahmad aspires to have four wives and twenty kids, all while being supported by German taxpayers. He expresses gratitude to Angela Merkel.

@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo

🇩🇪 GERMAN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THIS: 1) Syrian refuge Ahmad, who lives with his 2 wives and 6 children around Hamburg 2) He is illiterate and does not want to work, nor learn German 3) Ahmad wants 4 wives and up to 20 kids His life is fully financed by the German taxpayer. -> So normal people go to work daily, so he can make children with his wives and chill at home. Ahmad: “I'm very, very, very grateful to Mama Merkel.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Eine syrische Flüchtlingsfamilie lebt im Landkreis Pinneberg bei Hamburg: Ahmad mit zwei Frauen und sechs Kindern in einem Haus, das vom Jobcenter bezahlt wird. Das Einkommen wird überwiesen und er hebt es ab. Ein Familienmitglied bedankt sich mehrfach mit „Ich bedanke mich sehr, sehr, sehr bei Mama Merkel.“ Die Unterkunft hat fünf Zimmer, zwei Bäder und eine Küche; eine dritte Frau müsste bei Bedarf in einer größeren Wohnung schlafen. Wie Betol, die Erstfrau, nach Deutschland kam, ist unklar; das Bundesamt äußert sich aus Datenschutzgründen nicht dazu. Offenbar hatte Achmed auf Familienzusammenführung geklagt und Recht bekommen; der Richter sagte: „wir helfen dir, deine Frau hierher zu holen, denn wir wissen, sie sind Muslim und dürfen eine, 2, 3 oder 4 Frauen heiraten.“ Der Flüchtlingsstatus ist drei Jahre gültig; damit könnte Achmed arbeiten oder einen Deutschkurs belegen, doch er bleibt Analphabet und will lieber Zeit mit den Kindern verbringen. A Syrian refugee family lives in the Pinneberg district near Hamburg: Ahmad with two wives and six children in a house that the municipality provided and that the Jobcenter pays for. The income is transferred and he withdraws it. A family member repeatedly says, “I would like to thank Mama Merkel very, very, very much.” The accommodation has five rooms, two bathrooms and a kitchen; a third wife would have to sleep in a larger apartment if needed. How Betol, the first wife, came to Germany is unclear; the Federal Office will not comment for privacy reasons. Apparently Achmed had filed for family reunification and won; the judge said: “we will help you bring your wife here, because we know she is Muslim and may marry one, two, three or four wives.” The refugee status is valid for three years; that would allow Achmed to work or take a German course, but he remains illiterate and prefers to spend time with the children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ein ganz normaler Tag 1 syrischen Flüchtlingsfamilie. Ahmad lebt mit seinen beiden Frauen und 6 Kindern in einem kleinen Häuschen im Landkreis Pinneberg bei Hamburg. Ahmad wollte immer nach Deutschland. Speaker 1: Hier gibt's ihr Unterstützung. Sie geben uns Sozialleistungen. Sie geben uns dieses Haus. Wie Speaker 0: viel bekommen Sie im Monat? Speaker 1: Weiß ich nicht. Das Geld wird überwiesen und ich gehe zur Bank und hebe es ab. Speaker 2: Ich bedanke mich sehr, sehr, sehr bei Mama Merkel. Speaker 0: Das Haus, in dem sie leben, hat die Gemeinde gestellt und wird vom Jobcenter bezahlt. Speaker 1: Hier ist das Zimmer meiner ersten Frau und da gegenüber das meiner zweiten. Speaker 0: 5 Zimmer, 2 Bäder und die Küche. Wo würde eine dritte Frau schlafen? Speaker 1: Dann müsste die Wohnung größer werden. Speaker 0: Wie genau Betol, die Erstfrau mit den Kindern, nach Deutschland kam, ist unklar. Das zuständige Bundesamt will sich nicht äußern aus Datenschutzgründen. Offenbar hatte Achmed auf Familienzusammenführung geklagt und Recht bekommen. Speaker 1: Der Richter sagte mir, wir helfen dir, deine Frau hierher zu holen, denn wir wissen, sie sind Muslim und dürfen eine, 2, 3 oder 4 Frauen Speaker 2: heiraten. Dann Speaker 1: gibt es vonseiten des Gerichts keinen Widerstand, dass sie ihre Zweitfrau nachholen. Speaker 2: Ich bedanke mich sehr, sehr, sehr bei Mama Merkel. Speaker 0: Wie viel Kinder wollen Sie haben? Speaker 1: Ich? 10, 20, kein Problem. Speaker 0: Und wie viele Ehefrauen? 4. Speaker 2: Bei Allah, Friede sei mit ihm. Speaker 0: Mittlerweile hat die Familie einen Flüchtlingsstatus, eingeklagt per Gerichtsentscheid, gültig für 3 Jahre. Damit könnte Achmed auch arbeiten gehen oder zumindest einen Deutschkurs belegen. Der Analphabet will aber lieber bei den Kindern sein.
View Full Interactive Feed