reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

Meet Judge Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee and the woman who will oversee the newest Trump indictment. She is absolutely the worst case scenario for Trump. She spent 12 years at the law firm Boies Schiller where Hunter Biden was also employed. She has been very tough on Jan 6 defendants, including putting 4 in jail even though the DOJ didn’t recommend jail time. She sentenced one man to jail who didn’t even enter the Capitol, he just took a selfie outside. Is anyone surprised that the DOJ “randomly” got this judge?

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Corrupt Obama Judge Overseeing President Trump’s Case Has a History of Outrageously Corrupt Rulings Crushing Conservatives and Letting Liberals Off Scot-Free via @gatewaypundit

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Corrupt Obama Judge Overseeing President Trump's Case Has a History of Outrageously Corrupt Rulings Crushing Conservatives and Letting Liberals Off Scot-Free | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor This exclusive report originally appeared on JoeHoft.com and was republished with permission. thegatewaypundit.com

@bberghofsr - bberghofsr

This is a judge in one of the Trump cases how the hell is this possible

@lakemonstercl1 - 🇺🇸Steve2A🇺🇸God🇺🇸Family🇺🇸Country🇺🇸

These judges and DAs are not installed because they’re smart, they’re there because they’re corrupt and they’re bought and paid for! What’s their job, well it’s to get Trump! https://t.co/J0TMAehr94

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Total BS…

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

This ruling will not age well. Remember, Trump wants this. Trump in his team expected this, that the deep state would attempt to use judges to block executive actions from executive branch official. This is all going to be hashed out now not a year or two from now . They are taking their best shot with the judges to stop him. Legally and constitutionally, they have no leg to stand on .

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

What happens is that those who want the government corruption & waste to continue will shop around the country for an activist judge to do their bidding. It is an undemocratic and unconstitutional power grab by a tiny group of radical leftists!

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama-appointed judge threatened Trump and his team with arrest if they don't restore every last dime of funding that has been paused or cancelled. If the president wants to delay any payment he will need to justify his request to the judge's personal satisfaction.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

For four years, these same DC judges routinely lamented attempts to “overthrow democracy” on Jan 6. Now these same unelected judges are defying the will of a president who won at least 77 million votes to protect unelected nameless bureaucrats.

@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney

JUST IN: Judge Amy Berman Jackson becomes the 5th judge *today* to block an aspect of Trump's early-term orders, this time the firing of ethics watchdog Hampton Dellinger. And night isn't over. yet ... https://t.co/dUaxwZeOmq

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: An Obama-appointed judge ruled that President Trump must work with Special Counsel Hampton Dellinger, a Biden-appointed official, instead of his own chosen legal counsel. Judge Jackson issued an order mandating Dellinger represent the president and barred Trump from appointing any other Special Counsel.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) exists precisely to handle disputes over federal employment decisions, including claims of wrongful termination due to political reasons. This process is designed to ensure that federal employees are treated fairly while also maintaining the integrity of the civil service system. The problem arises when federal employees, rather than following the proper administrative procedures, seek out sympathetic judges who may disregard established legal channels to issue politically motivated reinstatements. This undermines both the rule of law and the structure Congress set up for handling these disputes. Judicial intervention in such cases—when it bypasses the MSPB and lacks legal authority—amounts to judicial fiat, an overreach that erodes separation of powers and politicizes the judiciary. If an employee truly believes their termination was unlawful, they should go through the MSPB process, appeal any adverse decisions to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (as provided by statute), and abide by the system designed to handle such disputes—not forum shop for an activist judge to rewrite the rules. h/t @BasedMikeLee

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Which law firms are pushing these anti-democratic cases to impede the will of the people?

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Democrat judges across the country are working with Democrat AGs and NGOs to either block/delay president Trump's EOs aimed at reducing fraud, abuse, and waste. This time it is Biden-appointed Judge Angel Kelley from MA ordering Trump to restore DEI funding to the NIH.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

This judge is a Trump deranged Democrat activist. Below is proof he is not capable of making good decisions from the bench. He should be impeached.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

There needs to be an immediate wave of judicial impeachments, not just one

@amuse - @amuse

USAID: The swamp is deep. One of the activist judges blocking Trump's agenda, Judge John Bates, is married to the founder of a USAID-funded NGO. Carol Rhees is a Democrat lawyer who started Hope for Children in Ethiopia a long-time USAID grant recipient. h/t @pepesgrandma

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The Obama-appointed judge that threatened the Trump administration with arrest if funding was not restored to USAID previously likened Trump's first term to the Civil War and Jim Crow and compared Trump to a tyrant in 2021 video footage uncovered by @nataliegwinters. Judge McConnell is an activist who has no business sitting in judgement of the president or his administration.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama-appointed judge threatened Trump and his team with arrest if they don't restore every last dime of funding that has been paused or cancelled. If the president wants to delay any payment he will need to justify his request to the judge's personal satisfaction.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Impeach this activist posing as a judge! Such a person does great discredit to the American justice system.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨EXCLUSIVE🚨 US District Judge Jeanette Vargas, who just extended a temporary block on @DOGE from accessing Treasury Department systems in her effort to attack President Trump in conjunction with NY Attorney General @TishJames, is a BIDEN DONOR, according to FEC records I have uncovered. I’ve also discovered that her Indian husband Shivashish Chatterjee confounded a finance company in India called DMI Finance, and according to the FEC, he is also a Democrat donor who has made over 51 political contributions to Joe Biden and Democrats. He congratulated his wife on his Linked In page below when she was appointed by Joe Biden on March 20, 2024 to serve as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Judge Vargas said at a court hearing that she would not yet rule on a request from 19 Democratic state attorneys general (led by the crooked @TishJames) for a longer preliminary injunction on DOGE's access to the Treasury systems. Judge Vargas is another Biden appointed activist judge whose political donations should disqualify her from overseeing cases involving the Trump Admin. Are there any non biased judges? We are still subjected to Banana Republic activist judges even though Trump is President. See receipts below 👇🏻 @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

QUID PRO QUO? It’s worth noting the political contributions of Shivashish Chatterjee, the husband of Judge Jeannette Vargas. Between May 19-May 25, 2024 Chatterjee contributed a total of $6,600.00 to Gillibrand For Senate @SenGillibrand . Additionally, on May 18, 2024 Chatterjee contributed $6,600.00 to the New York Majority Fund. Gillibrand is a beneficiary of the aforementioned committee. On March 20, 2024, Democrat New York Senator Kristen Gillibrand announced her recommendation of Judge Vargas for the Southern District of New York in a Press Release thanking Joe Biden. Draw your own conclusions…. RECEIPTS 👇🏻 Cc: @CcpSkipTracer @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Wow

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: A federal judge has BLOCKED President Trump from revoking the security clearance of Perkins Coie, the law firm which helped develop the Russia Hoax WTF? These activist judges HAVE TO GO. How can a judge FORCE the President to give someone a security clearance?! https://t.co/PW1SrLqEQT

@floridanow1 - floridanow1

It's DC's Judge Howell again. Judge Howell (Obama appointed) has always fought anything Trump does. Here are five notable rulings by U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell against Donald Trump or his administration: March 12, 2025 - Perkins Coie Executive Order: Howell blocked parts of Trump’s March 6 order targeting Perkins Coie, halting contract terminations and access bans. She ruled it violated free speech and due process, deeming it a loyalty punishment, though security clearance restrictions await further review. November 18, 2022 - Trump Attorney Testimony: Howell ordered Trump lawyers, including Evan Corcoran, to testify in a January 6 probe, rejecting privilege claims. She found evidence of potential crimes (obstruction, fraud) in Mar-a-Lago document handling, advancing Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation. August 31, 2021 - Trump Hotel Records: Howell upheld a House subpoena for Trump Organization’s D.C. hotel financials, dismissing executive privilege. She ruled Congress had a legitimate need to probe conflicts of interest during Trump’s presidency, favoring oversight over privacy claims. December 9, 2022 - Trump Contempt Ruling: Howell held Trump’s office in contempt for failing to fully comply with a grand jury subpoena for classified documents. She imposed no immediate penalty but warned of sanctions, escalating pressure in the Mar-a-Lago investigation. October 29, 2021 - Trump White House Records: Howell rejected Trump’s bid to block January 6 Committee access to White House records, denying executive privilege. She ruled Biden’s waiver and Congress’s need to investigate the Capitol riot outweighed Trump’s claims, releasing call logs and memos.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama-appointed, Trump-hating judge ruled Trump couldn't revoke Perkins Coie's security clearance. The firm behind the Russian Collusion Hoax was discovered to have a classified FBI computer system in its offices giving Democrats a backdoor into the DOJ.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel “I'm calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant's Daughter's company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father's courtroom - I wanna know the bank records because money doesn't lie - I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction - Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“ That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — AFL is investigating why Judge John McConnell was selected to preside over the lawsuit challenging President Trump’s spending freeze — despite his public opposition to the President and long-time ties to a group that now stands to receive millions after his ruling.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 On January 28, 2025, the District of Columbia and 22 states, including Rhode Island, sued the Trump Administration over President Trump’s temporary spending freeze.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 This lawsuit could have been brought in any number of jurisdictions — but it was filed in Rhode Island and assigned to Judge McConnell. The question is, why?

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 Judge McConnell has a long history of anti-Trump rhetoric and has been an outspoken critic of President Trump.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The Obama-appointed judge that threatened the Trump administration with arrest if funding was not restored to USAID previously likened Trump's first term to the Civil War and Jim Crow and compared Trump to a tyrant in 2021 video footage uncovered by @nataliegwinters. Judge McConnell is an activist who has no business sitting in judgement of the president or his administration.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that American constitutional values have been tested in recent years, reminiscent of challenges during the Civil War, Reconstruction, and Jim Crow era. They liken this testing to inflating a balloon, suggesting the rule of law was stretched to its limit, nearly bursting. The speaker emphasizes the importance of courts in upholding the rule of law against arbitrary actions, referencing recent examples. They stress that the Constitution embodies American values in a legal sense. When sentencing, one must consider the defendant's background, acknowledging their unique experiences as a woman, Black individual, transgender person, or someone from a different socioeconomic background. The law must be applied with this understanding.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So, what's happened over the last four years or so, and at other times in our country's history, going back to the Civil War and Reconstruction and Jim Crow laws, the Civil Rights and during the last four years is that the values that we live by, the constitutional values that form the basis of our country have been tested and our institutions have been tested in ways that I don't think a lot of folks thought would survive. It got tested in the 1800s by a war, and we survived the war, sometimes well and sometimes not so well, but that's for another story. So what we saw the last four years in my mind was a new testing of it. And how I think about it is, it's like a balloon, you know, and and you're blowing up a balloon and and you and you keep pushing that air in. Well, at some point, the balloon's gonna pop. Right? And and and and and it feels like over the last four years with the challenges that have occurred to the rule of law in this country, that we came very close to that balloon popping. But where courts stand and enforce the rule of law that is against arbitrary and capricious actions by, what could be a tyrant or could be what happened. We saw plenty of examples of that recently. And it enforces our values. Our values, in a legal sense, the Constitution. And it's that reason that, and we find there are plenty of examples of a history and there's plenty of examples over the last four years through government actions when you're sentencing someone, when we talk about sentencing, that you have to take a moment and realize that this, you know, middle class white male, privileged person, needs to understand the human being that comes before us that maybe a woman and maybe black, maybe transgender, maybe poor, maybe rich, maybe whatever, may have experiences that aren't yours and you have to walk in their shoes and understand that the law applies to them where they are. And then you have to apply the law accordingly.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama-appointed judge threatened Trump and his team with arrest if they don't restore every last dime of funding that has been paused or cancelled. If the president wants to delay any payment he will need to justify his request to the judge's personal satisfaction.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 Last month, AFL uncovered that Judge McConnell has served nearly two decades on the Board of Crossroads Rhode Island, an organization that has received at least $128 million in government funding during that time.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 AFL called for Judge McConnell to recuse himself from the case, given his history of opposition to President Trump and long-standing involvement with an organization that, after his ruling to keep federal funds flowing, stands to receive millions more in government funding.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

ICYMI — Judge McConnell, the federal judge blocking President Trump’s spending freeze, has served for 18 years on the board of a nonprofit that has received $128M in government funding during that time. Now, after his ruling to keep federal funds flowing, his nonprofit stands to receive millions more. Judge McConnell must recuse himself IMMEDIATELY.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 Now, AFL is expanding its investigation into how Judge McConnell was selected for this case in the first place. Out of the 22 states and D.C., why was the lawsuit filed in Rhode Island? And why was Judge McConnell selected to hear the case? We intend to find out.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 An impartial judiciary is the cornerstone of America’s judicial system. AFL remains steadfast in its commitment to exposing the left’s lawfare against President Trump — and holding those behind it accountable.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 Read more here: https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-expands-investigation-into-forum-shopping-effort-to-bring-lawsuits-against-trump-administration-before-activist-judges/

America First Legal Expands Investigation into Forum-Shopping Effort to Bring Lawsuits Against Trump Administration Before Activist Judges WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) expanded its investigation into Judge John McConnell, the Chief Judge of Rhode Island’s Federal District Court. Judge […] aflegal.org

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨 BREAKING: @AGPamBondi DEFIES Federal Judge, Says Deportation Flights WILL Continue Gosh I just love her. ❤️ Here are the details.... 1/🧵

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 2/ Obama-appointed Judge Boasberg tried stopping deportation flights of Venezuelan terrorists. He wants them on OUR STREETS. But AG Bondi just dropped a BOMBSHELL: "We will ABSOLUTELY continue the flights" 🔥

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 3/ “These are foreign terrorists, that the president has identified them, and designated them as such, and we will continue to follow the Alien Enemies Act,” Bondi said Monday

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 4/ Let's be CLEAR what we're dealing with: • Tren de Aragua gang members • Designated TERRORISTS • Illegally in America • Caught committing crimes in OUR country • Trump deporting them according to the law

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 5/ DIRECT QUOTE from Border Czar Tom Homan that'll make your jaw DROP: "I don't care what the judges think. I don't care what the left thinks. We're coming."

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 6/ He's right. Trump is following the law. And the three branches have EQUAL power to interpret and enforce the Constitution. One local judge does NOT have the authority to issue a nationwide injunction, esp on national security. Time to "resist". https://www.rodmartin.org/p/judicial-despotism-how-to-end-nationwide

Judicial Despotism: How to End Nationwide Injunction Abuse Democrats are attempting to win in court what they lost at the ballot box. But their strategy abuses the legal system and upends the Constitution. Here's what to do about it. rodmartin.org

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 7/ 🔥 The real story? Deep state trying to block Trump admin from protecting YOU and YOUR FAMILY. They're also trying to neuter the Presidency through unconstitutional judicial activism. But Bondi isn't backing down. Will Judge Boasberg hold her in contempt? Good luck.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 8/ And don't forget: this is a dirty judge. He was on the FISA court that authorized domestic spying on a political opponent (Trump 2016). That's Watergate times 1,000. He's been part of the lawfare for a decade. Absolutely corrupt.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 9/ It's time to stop judges from acting like dictators. The Constitution does NOT give them executive authority. We can't have hundreds of unelected Presidents. The voters elect one. This isn't against legitimate judicial authority. It's against unconstitutional abuse.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 10/ Expect more flights. More deportations. And more fireworks from Judge Boasberg and John Roberts. It's time to settle some of these issues. Trump has the guts to stand up. No Republican before ever did.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 11/11 If you enjoyed this content, please like and share; and also, sign up for your FREE subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org.

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

He’s a radical activist cosplaying as a judge

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: An Obama-appointed judge told Trump's lawyers they should assume that if a hearing is scheduled to challenge the president's actions, he will rule against them. Imagine trying to govern with 700 district court judges that expect you to be a mindreader. h/t @julie_kelly2

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

https://t.co/OuvbPJ4A5f

@moment_mirthful - Mirthful Moments

@elonmusk Ignore and impeach the corrupt judges. https://t.co/qHuZrn9iv4

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails until after the 2016 election He’s also now “coincidentally” presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

!!

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 WTF?! Judge Boasberg, the activist judge BLOCKING Trump from deporting violent gang members, intentionally DELAYED the release of Hillary Clinton’s emails until after the 2016 election He’s also now “coincidentally” presiding over the Signal case This is RIGGED! How do people not see that?

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Democrat-aligned NGOs are being protected by activist judges left and right. Judge Mary S. McElroy, a former Democrat activist, is forcing Trump to fund Marxists climate change NGOs led by prominent Democrats. Most annoying is the fact that the Obama-appointed judge was blocked by the Senate, but eventually appointed by Trump in his first term.