reSee.it - Related Post Feed

PunishDem1776
Posted - February 9, 2020 at 5:47 PM
Saved - July 23, 2023 at 3:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The War on Humanity: Who is the Enemy? Part 1. Wars driven by money and power benefit a select few. The Civil War's true motives were not solely about slavery, but also about money and tariffs. The Panic of 1837 and the sinking of USS Central America worsened tensions. Lincoln's antislavery platform and the Morrill Tariff fueled North-South conflicts. The war wasn't solely for freedom, but to serve hidden agendas. WW1: A secret society's influence shaped history. The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand was propaganda. The British Empire manipulated media to involve the US. WW2: Roosevelt provoked Japan to ensure they fired the first shot. The attack on Pearl Harbor had advanced knowledge. The truth behind these wars reveals a select few seeking control and dominance.

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

The War on Humanity Who is the Enemy Part 1 Why do we go to war? Through blood, money and power.. Who truly benefits? Civil war; 620,000 killed, 476,000 injured and 300,000+ captured and/or missing. What you were told was the civil war (1860-1865) was ..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Fought simply over slavery, that could not be further from the truth. What you are told is that war is about slavery, yet slavery was on both sides. As usual the war was over money, Tariff of Abominations (Tariff of 1828) which cutdown the trade of cotton..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

The war of 1812 left the U.S. in debt by paying for the war. The goal of the terrif was to protect the Northern states. "The panic of 1837" caused a sharp decline in the price of cotton as well as property value, due to Andrew Jackson not renewing the ..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Financial charter towards the central banks, so central banking created the collapse of 1837. In Sep 1857, the sinking of USS Central America along with 420 crew members and 30k pounds of gold contributed to the panic of 1857, which even furthered the..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Tensions between the north and the south. In history books, Lincoln ran on a antislavery platform...or only in the states added to the union? Even if Lincoln were to win the south would not be affected by slavery, however, Abe did want to raise the tariff ..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

For the northern states and the south opposed of the terrif due to the economy. Morrill Tarrif, wich is to replace the low tariff of 1857, to increase the financial district of the north including wallstreet, furthering the tensions between the north and..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

The south. Even after the war Ulysses S. Grant kept his slaves and Delaware was the last state "under" Lincoln to abolish slavery. So was it really about slavery or to persuade the public to serve a further agenda? The war was not for freedom, but against it.

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

WW1; 9 million dead soldiers, 7 million dead civilians and unknown captured/missing. How did WW1 start? 1914-1918 What you were lead to believe is that the war was a result of the death of Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Granz Ferdinard who was assassinated

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

By Gavrilo Princip (Bosnian Serb Yugoslav Nationalist) on June 28 1914, this was simply propaganda to start the war. London, winter 1891 3 of the most powerful men at that time were secretly conforming a secret society. These members will leverage the..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Wealth and influence to shape the course of history. This Brotherhood is similarly modeled by that of the Jesuits. Comprised of 2 circles, the "inner" circle "The society of the elect" was to silently direct the orders of the "outer" circle known as..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

"The society of the helpers" unknowingly to the outer circle. William T Stead, Reginald Brett and Cecil John Rhodes were those (funded by the Rothschilds) were those 3, Rhodes had enough wealth and influence to to enact their agenda through many resources..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

So what was the agenda of the "Rhodes round table" ? To form a secret society draining the worlds wealth and bringing the USA back to the Empire, Rhodes also included several other nations in this plot to bring about world domination and to have the British..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Race as the enforced culture in all countries around the world. After Rhodes death in 1902. Alfred Milner took over operations of the "Rhodes round table" . After Milner took control of the Rothschild funded "South Africa Civil Service", he acquired a team..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Of Oxford educated men to devise a plan to destabilize/eliminate Britains highest threat..Germany! The British Empire needed to confront Germany before they became militarily undefeatable, therefore the British ceased control of the media to get the public..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Opinion in their favor through propaganda such as "Harping Babies" to influence the public through emotion. But the British wouldn't confront such a conflict of their own and bringing the USA back to the Empire was part of the plan. So how did the..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

USA get involved in WW1? May 7th 1915 Colonel Edward M House and King George the Vth, the two speak of an ocean liner being sunk. As in Edwards quote "If this were done, a flame of Indignation would sweep across America, which would itself, probably..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Carry us into the war" . King George the Vth said "Suppose they should sink the Lusitania with American passengers on board " By "coincidence" at 2PM that very afternoon, is exactly what happened. So now the war gets personal for the Americans through the ..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Emotions of loss, wich sparked the American involvement into the war. This war (disguised under Nationalism, territory and emotions) is absolutely nothing more than the first attempt to create a new world order by the hands of a select few who seek..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Control over you, or even worse, [they] feel they have the right to rule over you, as the old bloodlines have practiced for centuries. WW2; Deaths 70-85million About 3% of worlds population Missing- unknown So how did WW2 start? What history told you is..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

That the US retaliated because of the Japanese bombing Pearl harbor in Dec 1941, wich was set up by design. Roosevelt wanted to get the US into war but for political reasons wanted to make sure that the first act of hostility came from the other side..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

So how would he accomplish such a goal? America provoked Japan to an extent that the Japs were forced to attack. "The question is how should we maneuver them (Japs) into position of firing the first shot" - Henry Stimson. So the first thing Roosevelt did was.

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Stop shipping oil to Japan wich increased economic tensions, for at the time Japan was very dependent on our oil and other resources. Japan was struggling to get the embargo lifted and resume normal trade and was again rejected. So Japan was given an ..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Ultimatum, an ultimatum authored by Harry Dexter White (who was actually a Soviet agent), the ultimatum was "Die by starvation or Die by communism". So the Japs were forced to attack in fight for their economy. Roosevelt was never held accountable for the..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Attack, instead only the military. In 1944 The Navy conducted an investigation into Pearl harbor, After observing the evidence and finding out Washington had advanced knowledge of the attacks the admirals were absolutely furious. Continue to part 2..

OliveGreens09
Posted - May 24, 2020 at 2:25 PM
Saved - November 20, 2025 at 6:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
From these posts I read bold claims of massive, centuries‑long Muslim violence: a total of 669 million non‑Muslims killed since 622, including 80 million Christians in Europe, the Balkans, and beyond. In India, Hindus allegedly fell from 600m to 200m, bringing total to 669m. They compare to the Spanish Inquisition, KKK, IRA, and cite slave trades and Dhimmi laws, asserting tens to hundreds of millions killed or enslaved across Africa, Asia, and Europe.

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

Islam Has Massacred Over 669+ Million Non-Muslims Since 622AD - https://bit.ly/2wuzcBN Jihad killed 80 million Christians in Balkan States, Ukraine, Hungary, Russia in 500 years.

Bitly | Page Not Found | 404 bit.ly

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

In India alone, Jihadi hordes have killed, according to #al_Biruni & #Ferishta, some 400 million HINDUS over a millennia. Bringing the population down to 200 million from 600 million. Adding HINDUS, total killings come to about 669 Million ! https://t.co/348L7gR1uE

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

For perspective, we take Spanish Inquisition ! More people were killed by Jihadis each year than 350 years of Inquisition, 1478-1834. It was an answer to the state of Spanish society after Iberian Peninsula was freed from Moslem Moors. It was brutal, savage & murderous. https://t.co/M8RCb1ka5y

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

#KKK in comparison ! Jihadis killed more people everyday than Ku Klux Klan in last 50 yrs. From 1865-1965, KKK ! Jihadis killed more in Thailand since 9/11 than KKK in 100 yrs. #IRA ! more civilians were killed in #2_hours on 9/11 than 36 yrs of Sectarian killings in Ireland. https://t.co/sJ6SEQdjNR

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

Africa : estimates some 11 million slaves taken across Atlantic. #14_million slaves to North Africa & Middle East ! For 25mn slaves another 100mn died ( David Livingstone) No of Christians killed us 9mn, add 50mn in Asia Minor, 80mn in Balkans... 139mn ! https://t.co/bjjsqOYybx

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

Koenard_Elst, 'Negation in India' puts the figure at 80 Million . #Swami_Vivekanand, in an interview, " when Mohammedans came we were said- I think on auth of Ferishta...- to have been 600mn but are only 200 Mn", (April 1899, Prabuddha Bharat). 400_MILLION_HINDUS ! https://t.co/K4Qd2KiMdP

@OliveGreens09 - OliveGreens09 (ONIONIST & UNSOCIAL) !

Only Christians & Jews were allowed to live as Dhimmis. Others weren't allowed to live, either Convert or Die ! Some 10mn Buddhist were killed in Central Asia, Afghanistan, India... Thousands of Jews were killed, live as Slaves, paid Jijya... https://t.co/cM5yBPGZPM

KeithWoodsYT
Posted - July 2, 2023 at 6:04 PM
Saved - March 12, 2024 at 1:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Slavery existed outside of the West and was often brutal. The Arab slave trade, which started before the Atlantic slave trade, caused the death of many slaves. African tribes and middlemen also played a role in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Europeans were also enslaved by Barbary pirates and sold in the Ottoman Empire. Slavery was present in China, Mongolia, American civilizations, Southeast Asia, and among Native American tribes. The difference is that Europeans abolished slavery, while the focus on their role is driven by anti-White animus.

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

🧵 A look at slavery outside of the West: It has become popular to blame White people for slavery, to the point that many actually believe slavery was invented by or exclusively practiced by Europeans. But the history of slavery outside the West is far more brutal. 1/15 https://t.co/cJzJzuFl1J

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

2/15 The Arab slave trade emerged in the 7th century, 10 centuries before the Atlantic slave trade Arabs sold Africans to the Middle East for a variety of jobs such as domestic work or harem guards - castrating male slaves was common, causing over half of males to bleed to death https://t.co/k1cKECM652

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

3/15 The Arab slave trade was particularly brutal: it's estimated that 3/4 captured slaves died before they reached the market for sale Historians estimate that between 10 and 18 million people were enslaved by Arab slave traders, including women and children taken as concubines https://t.co/2yCSatEC7Q

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

4/15 Arabs did not create the slave trade out of nothing, in fact, enslaving conquered tribes was already common practice in Central Africa when they arrived. The West African Songhai Empire relied heavily on captured slaves in all levels of society, even as soldiers. https://t.co/Hy9bQr0hwP

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

5/15 Africans themselves also played a large role in facilitating the trans-Atlantic slave trade. African tribes conducted raids on rival groups to provide slaves for sale. African middlemen facilitated trade between European traders and African suppliers. https://t.co/KyhubXqyvl

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

6/15 The Arabs also had a slave trade in Europe. Estimates are that up to 1.25 million Europeans were enslaved by Barbary pirates, who would raid villages in coastal countries like Italy, France, England and Ireland, bringing them to North Africa for sale. https://t.co/ix4u5GMWzv

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

7/15 In some cases entire villages would be captured, such as the Irish coastal village of Baltimore, entirely raided in 1631. These slaves faced a brutal future, engaging in hard labour or sexual servitude, and spending nights hot and overcrowded prisons called bagnios. https://t.co/6oZc3TZdq2

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

8/15 Many slaves captured by Barbary pirates were sold eastwards into the Ottoman Empire. Slavery was central to the Ottoman Empire, most towns had dedicated slavery markets called Yesirs. Slaves came from Africa, the Caucasus, the Balkans and Eastern & Southern Europe. https://t.co/VZsEysB1ML

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

9/15 Sexual slavery was a big part of Ottoman society. Slavic women were popular slaves, and Köçeks became a popular source of entertainment in the 19th century: These were young boys, usually from European backgrounds, who were circumcised, cross-dressed and trained as dancers. https://t.co/iWdvY4euFs

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

10/15 Hereditrary slavery is recorded in China dating back to the Xia Dynasty in 2100 BC. Africans purchased on the Silk Road were used as a sign of wealth. After Chinese law began to treat women as property around 1000AD it was common to sell daughters and sisters into slavery. https://t.co/Y4lfWUiM0U

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

11/15 The Mongols enslaves tens of thousands of Chinese as punishment for resistance. In the post-Mongol Ming Dynasty, thousands of slaves were employed to do bureaucratic jobs for the government, and rich families also employed thousands of slaves to perform menial labour. https://t.co/crGrYStkb2

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

12/15 Slavery was common in American civilizations like the Aztec and Maya Among the Aztecs, slavery was a punishment for a variety of crimes or even failure to pay taxes. Husbands and wives sold each other in times of economic hardship. Slaves were identified by wooden collars. https://t.co/kD7zseYyQw

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

13/15 Slavery was also common practice in the civilizations of South-East Asia. The Khmer Empire had a massive slave class that did much of the work building monuments like Angkor Wat. Historians estimate 25-35% of the population of Thailand/Burma were slaves in the 17th century https://t.co/1pQOraUDe3

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

14/15 Slavery also existed among Native American tribes. Slavery was common practice among Northwest tribes like the Tlingit, for whom one third of their population during the mid-1800s were slaves. Various tribes practiced debt-slavery and enslaved captives of other tribes. https://t.co/VRpBhKS2G2

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

15/15 The only difference between these cases of slavery and that practiced by Europeans is that Europeans abolished slavery on humanitarian grounds, and spread this across the globe. The intense focus on the White role in slavery is a product of widespread Anti-White animus. https://t.co/CdTUmh3hew

BelannF
Posted - July 9, 2023 at 7:13 PM
Saved - July 9, 2023 at 7:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Reparations failed in Lincoln's time; countless white Republicans died opposing slavery. But that wasn't enough. When will those who've never been slaves say "enough"? White Republicans stood with Black slaves, fighting the KKK and forming the NRA for their protection. It's time for Black communities to realize Democrats aren't true allies. They make empty promises for votes, neglecting meaningful help. Sadly, the government fails to assist Americans when it truly matters.

@BelannF - BelannF

WHEN THE LEFTIES START YELLING "RACIST" AND "REPARATIONS" - tell them the truth about history. Reparations didn't work during Lincoln's time (a Republican) - thousands of white people died to stop slavery (but that wasn't enough) - When will enough be enough for people who have never been slaves a day in their lives. White Republicans were hung right beside the slaves for helping the Black slaves - Republicans fought the KKK and created the NRA, so the freed slaves could protect themselves from the Democrat created KKK - When are the Black communities going to wake up to the fact that Democrats are not their friend - Democrats just promise them "stuff" to get their vote, but they really don't help them in ways that matter. Heck - The government doesn't help Americans in general when it comes to things that matter.

giezwacoin
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 10:31 PM
Saved - September 21, 2023 at 10:38 PM

@giezwacoin - GiezwaCoin

Here you go

@giezwacoin - GiezwaCoin

🇺🇸THE REPUBLICANS ENDED SLAVERY WITH 100% VOTE NOT THE DEMOCRATS 23% VOTE | REMEMBER THIS NEXT TIME YOU ASK A BLACK AMERICAN WHY ARE THEY REPUBLICAN #FACTS Abraham LINCOLN Was A Republican. This is How Republicans and Democrats Voted on Key Constitutional Amendments 13th…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lincoln believed that slavery needed to end, but not abruptly. He compared it to a cancer that needed containment. However, he realized that the Emancipation Proclamation was not a permanent solution and that the 13th Amendment was necessary to prevent the reestablishment of slavery. The war had a profound impact on Lincoln, as he experienced personal loss and carried the weight of the nation. He believed that the war was part of divine providence and wrote a memo reflecting on the role of a higher power. Lincoln wanted to emphasize in his second inaugural address that the war was fought to free the slaves and ensure the end of slavery in the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lincoln believed that the founding fathers had meant for slavery to end, but that they didn't believe that they could just end it overnight, that it was like a cancer. So widespread, you might not be able to cut it out without damaging the patient, but you can find ways to contain it. But by this time, he's not asking for the consent for the people. He's not asking for colonization. He's not asking for anything gradual. Lincoln knew that Saying, now the Speaker 1: war is over, you guys go back to be swayed, was a nonstarter, that the Emancipation Proclamation was necessary war measure. But when the war was over, it was no longer a legal measure. Speaker 0: And this is why you need the 13th Amendment. You have to change the Constitution. You've got almost 4,000,000 people who are enslaved and there was nothing to prevent southerners from reestablishing slavery in the south unless the 13th amendment was issued. He realized that something had to be done that was permanent. And so he is determined that this Amendment is going to pass congress, and it does. Speaker 2: He came to recognize The inconsistency that a nation conceived in liberty would have slavery. Speaker 0: To the extent that America has any kind of standing in the world now, is in part the consequence of people knowing about Lincoln and his views on slavery and his views on freedom. He has evolved in his thinking, and it's the war that has done it. Speaker 1: By the time the 13th Amendment came along. The war was dragging on and on. More Americans died in that war than in any other, both sides. And a lot had happened to him and to the whole country by that time. Speaker 2: He's seen the death. He's experienced extreme personal loss. Early in the war with the death of Willie, all of this has moved him. And he's Carried the weight of a nation on him. Speaker 3: All these people wiped out by the war. He must write letters consoling those who had lost members of families, fathers, brothers, And all of this grinds him down. You see it in his face. The hollows of his cheeks sink more deeply in. He said at one point that there was a tired spot in him that no amount of rest could touch. Speaker 4: Those photographs are haunted. Etched on his face is a testimony, a record of the stress that he endured. Every president, ages during the presidency, but nothing like Lincoln 3 or 4 years after he assumes office, it gives you a sense of the burden that he was carrying. Speaker 5: How can any human being accept the casualties that were piling up and take personal responsibility without resigning Or killing yourself over this tragedy unless you could find a higher power that was instrumental in causing the war to go on for so long. And Lincoln writes a memo to himself that has become known as a meditation on the divine will. If god wills that this contest continue, it will continue. It must be divine providence forcing us to have this bitter confrontation over the future of our country. But Lincoln never joined a church. He was not a believer in organized religion. Speaker 1: As he prepared for the 2nd inaugural address, He wanted to make clear to everybody that he, Lincoln, understood that the war Had been a war to free the slaves and not just a war to save the union. And he wanted to make sure that everybody good. That slavery was done forever in the country. Speaker 6: Fellow countrymen, 4 years ago, all thoughts were anxiously Directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it.
EndWokeness
Posted - October 10, 2023 at 4:47 AM
Saved - October 10, 2023 at 5:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Slavery, a global phenomenon for centuries, was prevalent in various cultures. Europe led the way by banning it. Shockingly, 1.25 million white individuals were enslaved in North Africa. Surprisingly, even free blacks in America owned 20,000 black slaves. Sadly, slavery persists in Africa and Asia.

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Slavery facts they don’t teach: Slavery existed all over the world across all cultures for thousands of years Europe was the first continent to ban it 1,250,000 white people were kidnapped & sold to North Africa as slaves 20,000 black slaves were owned by free blacks in America Slavery still exists in Africa and Asia

AlixG_2
Posted - December 11, 2023 at 3:52 AM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:26 AM

@AlixG_2 - Alix

"If you were to give reparations to everyone whose ancestors had been slaves, I suspect that you would have to give reparations to more than half the entire population of the globe. Slavery was not confined to one set of races" 🔗 Thomas Sowell https://t.co/LvDSt0D20A

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the evidence behind the idea of reparations and argues that slavery was a universal curse, not confined to one race. They mention that giving reparations to all descendants of slaves would involve a significant portion of the global population. The conversation then shifts to discussing the concept of white guilt and the ongoing legacy of slavery. The speaker expresses skepticism about apologizing for the actions of past generations and highlights a quote from Scalia about not owing anyone anything based on their race.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It would be nice to know his, evidence for what he said just to be old fashioned about it. No. It it it was a rotten system, but I don't know how how how we get from that to reparations. I mean, What we see in the United States in terms of the bad things, you see all around the world. If you were to give reparations to everyone whose ancestors had been slaves, I suspect that you would have to give reparations To more than half the entire population of the globe, slavery was not confined to one set of races. I suspect that most of the people who are either slaves or slave owners around the world were neither white nor black. I mean this was this was a universal curse of the human species. Speaker 1: Africa, the Middle East, Asia, Speaker 0: slavery, terrorism and and it continued elsewhere Long after, it was abolished in the Western countries. Speaker 1: Alright. Let me try sticking with Ta Nehisi Coates, it's Shelby talks, Shelby Steele talks about white guilt. And in Ta Nehisi Coates you get almost the counterpart of that, kind of African American claim against the White guilt, And this seems it beginning with the abolitionists, even beginning before the Civil War, You've seen almost every generation, there's some expression that racism and slavery, as Shelby calls it, Correctly, of course, the sin of slavery is so deeply, it's something we still live with. How do we expiate it? How do we get past it? Is there something we can do to relieve ourselves of this legacy? Speaker 0: Oh, I think you should repeat it. If you were a slave owner, I I don't any reason why you should feel differently? On the other hand, I can't get over the idea of, a, apologizing for what b did. Okay. Even when they're contemporaries, much less when you put in the when when when one is dead and the other is alive. All right. I mean Scalia I remember was saying that I owe no man anything Because people who look like me did something to people who look like him.
dom_lucre
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 1:42 AM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 7:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts highlight various historical events and perspectives on slavery, emphasizing the role of different groups and political parties. They suggest that Democrats use slavery to divide Black and White Americans, while also discussing the involvement of Black slave owners and Jewish individuals in the slave trade. The posts argue that slavery is not solely a Black and White issue, as Native American tribes also had slaves. They question the narrative taught in the liberal education system and suggest that Black Moors and Jewish, Roman, and British settlers played a role in creating current propaganda. The posts conclude by suggesting that understanding true history and recognizing manipulation will end the game being played.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Democrats use slavery to keep Black and White Americans divided. The first slave owner in America was a Black man and majority of the people who owned the slave ships were Jewish. Christopher Columbus ‘found’ America in 1492 which is the same year of The Expulsion of Jews from Spain following the Alhambra Decree. Even Native Americans tribes had slaves. Majority of the black slaves were already in America. Democrats falsely label slavery as a Black and White problem but they were the majority that approved for the first slave owner Anthony Johnson to own a black man as a slave. Slave is a term that comes from Slavic, Slavics aren’t Black, there were a large amount of White slaves that were actually greatest worst because they were cheaper. Everything the Liberal education system is teaching us is a new narrative to divide us. Black and White people have always been the political pawns of the Democratic Party and those that control them. Black Moors from Spain worked with Jewish, Roman descendants and British settlers to create a lot of the propaganda we see today. There is a reason the hat that the Shriners wear that has a saber above the head of a pharaoh the same hat that the Moors wear. What happens when we learn our true history and accept that we are being played? That’s when their game is over.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The first slave owner in America was a black man named Anthony Johnson, who owned 602 acres of land and enslaved both white and black servants. Johnson sued for the return of a black servant named John Casor, leading to a court ruling that allowed Johnson to continue owning Casor as a slave. Free black people also owned slaves in various parts of America. The transcript mentions specific examples of black slave owners and their holdings. It also highlights that slavery was not exclusive to Africans and was practiced in various parts of the world. The purpose of sharing this information is to challenge the narrative that only white Americans were involved in the slave trade.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1st slave owner in America was a black man, but Democrats don't want you to know that. I'll explain why. Anthony Johnson, the 1st legal slave owner in America, was an Angolian Moor who achieved the freedom in early 17th century colony in Virginia. In 16/51, Anthony owned 602 150 late acres of land and services of 4 white and 1 black indentured servant. The black servant, John Casor, offered Johnson work, and he signed a term of indenture servitude to the planter and left when he was done. However, Johnson sued Casher in the Northampton Court in 16/54 for the return of Casher. The court initially filed in favor of Parker, But Johnson appealed in 16/55. The court reversed its ruling under the Anthony Johnson, A Negro still owned John Kaser, a black man. The court ordered that he'd be returned with the court dues paid by Robert Parker. This made Anthony Johnson a Negro, the 1st legal American slave owner in America. Why would they hide this? Let's continue to go on. The first time a judicial determination in the 13 colonies holding that a person who had committed no crime could be held in servitude for life. John Caso worked tirelessly without pay nor any rights in Johnson's plantation until his death. Free Negroes could Even on the services of white indentured servants in Virginia as well. Free Negroes owned slaves in Boston in 17/24 and in Connecticut in 17/80 By 17/90, 48 black people in Maryland owned a 143 slaves. The 18/60 Census Bureau Verifies this, and I add all of the original citations in the link here, but just for time, we'll continue. So as we're going on, one particularly notorious Black Maryland farmer named Nat Butler regularly purchased and sold Negroes for the southern trade on the eve of the civil war By a group of free Negroes in New Orleans offering their services to the confederacy to keep their slaves. This was Nat Love and his family, And that love was also, as I stated, the black slave owner. The father of Black History Month, Republican Carter G Woodson studied how many Negroes owned slaves. About 13.7, 319,000 Of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves out of a total of 2,000,000 slaves owned in the entire United States. August DuPlete of Iberville, Paris DuPlete, Was considered the wealthiest of Negro slaveholders. His real property was valued at $200,000. His plantation totaled more than 1200 acres. He had 94 slaves. Anton de Koehr owned more than 1,000 acres and had 112 slaves. Right here, you probably can't see it, but I have a highlight Right there where the news article specified these steps. On per capita basis, whites were not the most conspicuous owners of slaves, nor were all blacks. Between the founding of Jamieson and the declaration of independence, more whites and blacks arrived as slaves in North America. As you can see right here, it's showing what the Negroes wanted And showing that they were paying for Irish Negroes as well. Also showing that majority of the slave shows was owned by Jewish people. Not majority. So to be honest with you, majority of the slave Trade barely has anything to do with white Americans. White Americans didn't really even bring the black slaves here for the few that did come. Majority of them were already in the Americas. White slaves were abused more than Negro slaves. The reason is simple. White slaves were cheap. Negro slaves cost more. Frederick Law Olmstead saw Negro slaves tossing bills into an Irish slave. If the whites were not Overboard or broke his backs, the owner had not lost much. That was quoted for them. Right here. So it didn't matter if a white slate was to be lost, just like you don't care that much about maybe a Toyota Camry in reference of or in comparison of a Lamborghini. The same thing is done then. It was just product. Those weren't viewed as humans. They were viewed as product. And a white slave was deemed as a cheaper product. And you're going cheaper. You're gonna take you are going to treat a cheaper product as if it's cheap. It wasn't just Africans that enslaved, Norway was the 1st slave enslaved people. It was popular throughout Europe, West and East Asia, also as Russia. Slave means Slavic. Slavery was not invented by Africans. The truth is censored to keep us divided with lies. 18/60 Cherokee Nation citizens owned 2,511 slaves. Chuktawa Citizens owned 2,349 slaves. The Creek citizens owned 1532 slaves. Chickasaw citizens owned 975, which amounted to 18% of their total population, A proportion equivalent to that of white slave owners in Tennessee
AwakenedOutlaw
Posted - February 16, 2024 at 3:35 AM
Saved - February 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Slavery has been a prevalent and horrifying part of human history. Many people lack an understanding of its true scope and horror due to inadequate education. It is important to recognize that slavery was not limited to a specific time or political party. Additionally, it is alarming to realize that there are more people enslaved today than ever before. This is a disturbing reality that should be acknowledged.

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

I believe everyone can agree that slavery is a horrible thing. Unfortunately, history is rife with it. The sad truth is that slavery represents more the standard than the exception in the history of human civilization. And like it or not, that's just how it's been since the 'ye old cave days. However, based mainly on having been subjected to poor education their whole lives, many cannot appreciate the relative scope and horror of it. As a result, a good deal of them harbor an unhealthy vision in their head having been knowingly warped versions of history. You see, America isn't going to make itself out to be the "bad guy" as a means of guilt-shaming itself into compliance with the NWO all on its lonesome. RE: History - It's said that it's written by the victor, and I don't think anyone would disagree. Unfortunately for us, we've all been in the losing bracket for a LONG ASS TIME. As a result, many have this distorted image of slavery in their minds wrongfully believing that it was only something the Anntebelum/Plantation Era Democrats used to engage in. 👉Which they most certainly did That being said, it's worth comparing & contrasting that history against the fact that there are more people in slavery around the world TODAY than at any point in history. Yes, it's pretty messed up. But it's at least worth chewing on if you weren't previously aware.

IanMalcolm84
Posted - April 22, 2024 at 3:37 PM
Saved - April 22, 2024 at 4:29 PM

@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84

BLACKS ALREADY GOT REPARATIONS In a given lifetime, blacks take A MILLION DOLLARS A PERSON from white Americans. Those are paid out via food stamps, welfare, & endless other programs designed to take from whites to give to blacks Time to be honest & put an end to this insanity https://t.co/XpliVzGZ01

stclairashley
Posted - June 21, 2024 at 5:22 PM
Saved - June 21, 2024 at 9:49 PM

@stclairashley - Ashley St. Clair

While slavery was common to all civilizations, only one civilization developed a moral revulsion against it: Western Civilization “Rather than be ashamed as Westerners, we should stand proud for having led the world out of a mentality where slavery was the norm.” 🔥🔥🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
Slavery was common across civilizations, not just in the West. It was not solely based on race. Many different races owned slaves, including black people and Native Americans. The US government fought to end slavery, and reparations may not be the best solution. Western civilization was the first to reject slavery morally, so we should not feel ashamed but proud.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first point is that everyone had slaves. Okay? People of all colors became slaves for economic reasons, because of war, because slavery, as odious as it was, was simply a normal way of life. Arabs were extracting millions of black African slaves centuries before Christian nations did for about 13 centuries, compared to the 3 centuries European nations ran the Atlantic slave trade. Arabs marched African slaves across the Sahara Desert, and as such, they died more often. It was customary to castrate them and many died from this practice. The Arabs also enslaved over 1,000,000 white European Christians. The term slavery, in fact, comes from the word Slav. The Slavs inhabited Eastern Europe and were taken by the Muslims of Spain in the 19 in the 9th century. Not to mention that Africans have been enslaving each other for 1000 of years. The point is that slavery The the second point is that slavery was not about race, and it's important. It was not about race. The only reason we think it's about race is because philosophers like David Hume in the 18th century ranked human beings and put Africans at the bottom saying that they had no souls. The enlightenment imposed the concept of race on a practice that had been going on for centuries, in order to justify that practice. And why did they have to justify it? And this is the point. Because people in the West began to question slavery's moral validity. The fact is that people of all colors owned slaves, both as part of the Atlantic slave trade and outside of it. In the United States and Caribbean, black people, black people owned thousands of black slaves, and so did the Native Americans. Nearly 20,000 of the Native Americans, 5 civilized tribes sided with the confederacy during the civil war, fighting to keep slavery alive. 28% of the black population who were free in New Orleans pledged their support to the Confederacy. All of the 13 southern states of the confederacy had substantial numbers of black slave owners. There were more than 250,000 free blacks and nearly 4,000 of them were slave masters, who owned more than 20,000 slaves. The practice of slavery was legal, after all. We need to remember that governments did not own slaves. Slave owners did. In fact, the US government fought a war to end slavery. How much should the descendants of the 400,000 Union soldiers, who lost their lives fighting to free the slaves, pay to the descendants of the slaves they freed? Giving people lump sums of money does not work. Economists often point to the Georgia Land Lottery of 18 32, in which parcels of land were distributed randomly. What happened to the descendants of those who were lucky enough to be given this land? Are they the richest families in Georgia? No. In fact, within 1 generation after the distribution of the Georgia land, one could not distinguish between those who had been given land and those who hadn't. Certainly, my own direct experiences of working for 20 plus years in the inner city with families on welfare demonstrates this time and time again. Rather than give a man a fish, it is always better to teach him how to fish. All giving the fish does is make the giver feel better. Reparations might relieve white people of their guilt, but it will do little else. So back to my initial question. Why are we only discussing whether the West should pay reparations for slavery? Because while slavery was common to all civilizations, only one civilization developed a moral revulsion against it very late in its history, western civilization. Not even the leading moralists in other civilizations rejected slavery at all. Rather than be ashamed as westerners, we should stand proud for having led the world out of a mentality where slavery was the norm, and we should vote against this motion. Thank you.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@WallStreetSilv And slavery is still active in many parts of the world https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_the_21st_century

Slavery in the 21st century - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org
TrueJMitchell
Posted - November 25, 2024 at 10:12 PM
Saved - November 26, 2024 at 11:03 AM

@TrueJMitchell - (Jason) Stands For Truth

🔺️The United States didn't create slavery. 🔺️Slavery was around before the United States was formed. 🔺️The United States was one of the first to get rid of slavery. 🔺️Many countries in the world today still have slaves sadly. https://t.co/qIvQ3CAv5d

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's interesting how discussions about slavery often imply that America created it. However, many ancient empires, like Egypt, Rome, Greece, and Mali, also relied on slavery. In Africa, tribal conflicts led to the capture and sale of people into slavery long before European involvement. These conversations are challenging and often avoided due to their emotional weight. The narrative of oppression has overshadowed the rich and complex history of various peoples. America uniquely fought a civil war over slavery, aiming to humanize slaves and legislate their freedom. Despite this, many in America still express grievances about privileges that others around the world lack. Today, slavery persists in various countries, and many people still endure these harsh realities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Always been interesting to me how when people bring up slavery, they act as if America created slavery. Right? And what follows is, well, America was built on the backs of slaves. And I say, okay. Let's say that's the case. Then that would also mean that the Egyptian empire was built on the backs of slaves. Right? The Roman and Greek empires were built on the backs of slaves. The empire of Mali, which was one of the wealthiest African nations ever, where the wealthiest king in history had more gold than the entire European continent, had literal caravans, hundreds of thousands of slaves and servants at his disposal. The Ghanaians, the Nigerians, we think to ourselves, well I mean, but America, you know, came to Africa and stole all these people. I know that's the story that sells, but I hate to break it to you. As a man who was born in Africa, there is a rich history of tribalism. Right? Unfortunately, tribe versus tribe, tribes capturing other tribes and selling them off into slavery. Now I know these conversations are not easy to have. I know they're oftentimes avoided because they've been so hyperemotionalized. They've been weaponized against the people. Right? Black folks in America have had the story of slavery weaponized towards them to make them feel as if they were lesser than to have them, you know, live in this perpetual state of of oppressed versus oppressor. And there's been an eradication of the entire rich history and also dark history of this world. Right? That, you know, you probably came from peoples who had their own empires, and then at some point, they were captured by others. This has been the history of humanity. I don't want it to be this way. You don't want it to be this way, and that's why a place like America fought for it not to be this way. This was the first country to fight itself internally on the basis of slavery. Now I'm not saying that other tribes, you know, other empires that there weren't wars in the context of slavery, but America was a first where it was about legislating the the freedom of slaves. This was the first place that looked to humanize slaves. And so, again, it it blows my mind when the very nation that has fought and toiled with itself on some of the darkest human rights issues and has been successful in so many is where you find the majority of people who are complaining the most about the very privileges that some people across the planet don't even have at this point. The things we're complaining about today, some people are still literally going through right now at this very moment. There are still countries that allow for slavery, and it's rampant.
jeannita
Posted - December 23, 2024 at 6:02 PM
Saved - December 23, 2024 at 8:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Los Banqueros, en colaboración con la CIA y MOSSAD, financiaron iglesias evangélicas, predominando la influencia judía. Afirmo que el evangelismo es una invención judía, originada hace aproximadamente 150 años cuando Nathan Rothschild alteró partes de la Biblia para promover el apoyo al pueblo judío y la creación de Israel. Esta versión, conocida como la Biblia Schofield, se distribuyó ampliamente en las Américas. La noción de Judeocristianismo es una falacia; estas no son religiones compatibles, sino una manipulación judía para dividir al pueblo americano. Estoy cansado de esta situación.

@jeannita - Jeanne des Sources

Los Banqueros financiaron las iglesias evangélicas a través la CIA con MOSSAD, y juntos eran en mayoría judíos. El evangelismo es una invención judía. Hace más o menos 150 años que Nathan Rothschild hizo cambiar partes de la biblia en donde agregó textos falsos que decía que había que apoyar al pueblo judío a lograr a establecer el país de Israel. Esa biblia alterada fue publicada y quedó siendo la única biblia que fue distribuida en todas las Americas. Se llamaba la Biblia Schofield. La idea que el Judeocristianismo existe y que son dos religiones que se pueden entender bien, es otra mentira. No son similares, aquellos no respetan a Cristo. Es otra subversión judía para manipular y dividir el pueblo Americano. Ya estamos muy cansados.

@CarloSierra1 - Carlos Sierra 🇨🇴 🇵🇸

Ustedes sabían que la CIA financió y orientó iglesias evangélicas por toda Latinoamérica como método de guerra cultural e ideológica?

Palsvig
Posted - December 28, 2024 at 8:40 AM
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 1:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some statistics about Jewish involvement in slavery in the 1860s and contrasted it with the role of white Christians in abolishing it. I pointed out how Hollywood and universities, often managed by Jewish individuals, have influenced perceptions of guilt among white people regarding slavery. I referenced historical events, including the Bolshevik Revolution, highlighting the suffering of Orthodox Christians and Muslims. I also discussed differing views on truthfulness in the Talmud and the Bible, questioning who the real good and bad guys are in these narratives.

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

78% of jews had slaves in the US in 1860's Less than 1% of non-jews had slaves White Christians were the first to abolish slavery even fighting a war to stop it dying in the millions in open fileds. Amazing how loxist Hollywood and US Universities with jewish management have been able to guilt trip white people for something they themselves were responsible for. Where have we seen that repeated? Clue: The Bolshevik whose leaders were 95% jewish killed 66 million Orthodox Christians and Muslims from 1917 - 1939. They would never falsely claim to have been genocided themselves now would they? In the Talmud lying to gentiles is allowed. In the Bible lying to anyone even non-Christians is NOT allowed. Who are the good guys? And Who are the bad guys?

@_NicoleNonya - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Why did General Grant later President Grant ban Jews from the South? Why did he blame Jews for the slave trade? Source https://archive.md/fqZ7a , you'll find Jews demanding $ from George Washington to create Israel long before 'Zionism' was invented. USA has been held hostage by Ashkenazic Jewish mafia banking cartel since the founding.

elonmusk
Posted - January 17, 2025 at 4:45 AM
Saved - January 17, 2025 at 1:57 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Slavery was almost everywhere and still exists in some parts of the world

@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24

Slavery occurred in civilizations including ancient Egypt, ancient China, the Akkadian Empire, Assyria, Babylonia, Persia, ancient Israel, ancient Greece, ancient India, the Roman Empire, the Arab Islamic Caliphates and Sultanates, Nubia, the pre-colonial empires of Sub-Saharan Africa, and the pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas.

ClassicLearner
Posted - April 1, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 7:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question why Thomas Jefferson's name is often linked solely to slavery. It's important to note that he initially called for the end of slavery in the Declaration of Independence and enacted the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which prevented slavery's expansion into the northwest. Additionally, he signed the bill that abolished the North Atlantic slave trade. These significant contributions to American and human history seem overlooked in education. I wonder why this information isn't more widely taught.

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

Why have schools made Thomas Jefferson’s name synonymous with Slavery? Did you know Jefferson called for the end of slavery in the original draft of the declaration of independence? Did you know Jefferson’s Northwest ordinance of 1787 stopped the spread of slavery to the northwest? Did you know that President Thomas Jefferson signed the bill that ended the North Atlantic slave trade? These are some of the greatest achievements in not only American, but human history… Yet most Americans aren’t taught any of it. Now, why do you think that is?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Declaration of Independence originally called for the end of slavery, referring to it as a cruel war against human nature, but this is not taught in schools. According to the speaker, only South Carolina and Georgia refused to sign it. The speaker says Thomas Jefferson ended the North Atlantic slave trade as president, yet schools associate his name with slavery. The speaker states Abraham Lincoln cited Jefferson's Declaration of Independence and Northwest Ordinance of 1787 as justification for ending slavery. The Northwest Ordinance is presented as the reason there was no slavery in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. The speaker believes there is an agenda to separate Americans from the history that has liberated them and encourages reading primary writings of historical figures. The speaker promotes courses and books on the second amendment, the history of fake news, and the corruption of the banking system at Classicallearner.com.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The declaration of independence you read growing up wasn't the original. The original draft called for the end of slavery. In fact, it referred to slavery as a cruel war against human nature, and only two of the 13 colonies refused to sign on, South Carolina and Georgia. Yet American schools have made Thomas Jefferson's name synonymous with slavery. They don't teach that as president of The United States, Thomas Jefferson signed the bill that ended the North Atlantic slave trade. He put an end to the importation of slaves from Africa, yet they loved to lionize Abraham Lincoln. But if you read Abraham Lincoln, nearly all of his justifications for ending slavery were citations of Jefferson, specifically the Declaration of Independence and Jefferson's Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which was the reason there was no slavery in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. Why didn't they teach you that in school? There is a massive agenda to separate Americans from the history that has liberated them, and this is why I always tell people that reading the primary writings of historical figures is so important and why I work so hard to teach young people how information is controlled. Get your kids in my courses and my books on the second amendment, the history of fake news, the corruption of the banking system, and so much more. Classicallearner.com.
JohnStossel
Posted - June 25, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 1:52 AM

@JohnStossel - John Stossel

Many act as if slavery was a uniquely American crime. “One reason,” says author Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630), “is that a lot of black people survived here.” He argues that much of what Americans are taught about slavery is just wrong: https://t.co/2dJD3pNmyq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Americans are taught that America was the worst when it comes to slavery, but this is complete nonsense. American slavery is portrayed as uniquely evil because slaves were considered property, but generational slavery was common worldwide. While the U.S. receives focus due to slavery, most slaves were not shipped there; the U.S. received under 400,000 out of 10-12 million. Focusing on historical abuse by white people won't help the black community gain capital, as modern problems aren't tied to ethnic conflict from 160 years ago. Problems in the black community increased with welfare programs. Almost every society had slavery, including the Aztecs, Persians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Vikings, and especially the Arab world, who took about 17 million people from Africa. The British and Americans were rare in abolishing slavery. The British Navy sank around 1,600 slave ships and freed 150,000 people. Saudi Arabia only recently abolished the slave trade, and the global slavery index estimates over 700,000 slaves still exist there. American slavery was horrible but not unique. Focusing solely on America's evils hasn't improved race relations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The original sin of slavery. The original sin of slavery. Speaker 1: Today, Americans are taught when it comes to slavery, America was the worst. Speaker 0: The Atlantic slave trade from Africa to The Americas was different from any other type of slavery. The United States didn't inherit slavery from anybody. We created it. Speaker 1: American slavery was worse because Speaker 0: The slaves were reduced to to property. They were channeled property. No other system of slavery did that except of American slavery. Speaker 1: That's complete nonsense. Wilfred Riley is a political science professor and author of Lies My Liberal Teacher Told Me. Speaker 0: Generational slavery, like if you're the son of a slave, you're a slave, that was extraordinarily common. Slavery around the world was slavery. Speaker 1: Books like this, Unfinished Nation. Yeah. Slaves in Africa were kept unfree only for a fixed term. Speaker 0: No is the short answer. Most of the slaves taken by these sort of players would be either kept as slaves for their entire life or more likely sold to the whites and the Arabs in two years. Today, partly thanks to the New York Times sixteen nineteen project, students are taught that America's slavery was unlike anything that existed before. We're the worst society ever. We've done things that no one else has ever done. And sometimes there's nothing wrong with acknowledging your historical mistakes. I mean, I am black, Irish, a bit native American at least per the family lore. I mean, those are those are three peoples that have experienced a great deal historically. Nothing wrong with acknowledging that. But, it's extremely odd to focus only on the negatives of your society and to exaggerate those. Americans are taught that slavers caught people in Africa and shipped them here. But few were taught that most slaves were not shipped to The United States. Between ten point seven million and twelve million slaves from Africa went to the New World. We got a little under 400,000. Under 400,000 out of 10,000,000. The extreme focus on slavery in The United States, why did that happen? One reason is that a lot of black people survived here. Slavery was harsh, but it is a lot less harsh than clearing the Brazilian jungle. Alright. But American blacks are at a disadvantage. They have less capital, financial and educational capital. What's the harm in pointing out how abusive white people were? The harm is that pointing out how abusive white people were is not going to get black Americans any more capital. Most of the problems of the modern black community don't have anything to do with historical ethnic conflict a hundred sixty years ago. Speaker 1: The great society asked not how much, Speaker 0: but how good. Speaker 1: Riley says most of the problems began when welfare began. Crime in the Speaker 0: black community, every time I've tried to break this out, increased about 800% between, say, 1963 and 1993. Racism didn't increase between 1960 and the modern era. You're looking at the impacts of the great society, the welfare programs. Riley argues it's better to teach the truth that almost every society had slavery. The Aztecs, the Persians, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Vikings, and most of all, the Arab world. The Arabs were probably history's premier slave traders. Sometimes they captured poor whites from Slavic countries. The Muslims, many of whom were dark skinned or even black, took so many blonde slaves out of this region that they gave the world Slav, slave, to the global slave population. Many slaves were forced into harems. Sexual slavery was a very much a part of slavery. Like, if your group was defeated in war, the men would probably just be killed or they'd be sold as farmhands. The women would often be sold as harem girls or prostitutes. More than a million Europeans were enslaved, but Muslim slave traders took more people from Africa. The Arabs targeting Africa took out about 17,000,000 people. Speaker 1: The British and then the Americans were the rare people who moved to abolish slavery. Speaker 0: So, yeah, the British Navy, in a story almost no one now knows, sank something like 1,600 slave ships. It freed a 150,000 people that were enslaved at the time. Speaker 1: Because the Brits objected for moral reasons. Speaker 0: Yeah. They'd had enough of it. Speaker 1: Saudi Arabia only abolished the slave trade relatively recently. Well, it's another inconvenient fact. Right? The global slavery index estimates that even now, although slavery is officially illegal, there are more than 700,000 slaves in Saudi Arabia. Where there were no westerners, you'd have a lot of slavery for a long time, and you do. American slavery was horrible, but it wasn't unique. Our culture would be healthier if we learned about that. And schools dwelling on America's evils hasn't helped Americans get over them. Gallup polls show that after schools started focusing on oppression, race relations got worse. The idea of generational slavery, the idea of slave trading, none Speaker 0: of that was was unique to America. And another thing, you don't need radicalism to critique the worst excesses of an existing system. All you need is incrementalism and honesty. Speaker 1: In a few weeks, I'll post a video about another of Riley's myths. The claim that before Columbus, the native people were kind stewards of the environment. Speaker 0: I know every rock and tree and creature has a life, has a spirit, has a name.
elonmusk
Posted - July 27, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Saved - July 28, 2025 at 3:08 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Slavery was standard practice throughout Earth until it was almost entirely ended principally by Anglo-American forces in the 19th and 20th centuries. Slavery still exists in some parts of the world btw. I’m not suggesting Britain was purely angelic, but, nonetheless, this is true.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

https://t.co/aI4MRgS3RD

sovey_X
Posted - August 5, 2025 at 12:00 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 11:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This map illustrates the distribution of enslaved Africans in the Americas: Brazil received 5.5 million, the Caribbean 4.7 million, and the United States only 450,000. While the horror of slavery is undeniable, the U.S. often bears the brunt of blame despite accounting for less than 5% of the transatlantic slave trade. This narrative overlooks the larger context of the Western Hemisphere. It seems that some prefer to maintain division and outrage for their own gain, rather than seek healing and understanding.

@sovey_X - Sovey

This map shows where enslaved Africans were actually brought in the Americas. Brazil: 5.5 million. Caribbean: 4.7 million. United States? 450,000. A horror? Yes. But not the whole story. The U.S. gets 100% of the blame in global discourse, yet received less than 5% of the transatlantic slave trade. It doesn’t count the babies born into slavery, and yes, the institution itself was monstrous. But historical nuance matters. Why don’t we talk about the rest of the Western Hemisphere? Or is outrage only profitable when it targets America? There’s an entire industry built on keeping racial wounds open: politicians, professors, media figures. They don’t want healing. They want followers, funding, and forever division.

thatsKAIZEN
Posted - August 10, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 6:23 PM

@thatsKAIZEN - Kaizen D. Asiedu

White people didn't invent slavery. Here's the uncomfortable truth. https://t.co/jbddmQEfzz

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "White people didn't invent slavery. In fact, they were the first to end it." - "Slavery is evil, but it's an ancient human evil practiced by everyone to everyone." - "Trans Saharan slave trade." - "Barbary slave trade." - "Europeans did take slavery to another scale when they came to Africa." - "Which major power stopped slavery first? The British, in large part because of pro human Christian values." - "White people aren't better than anyone else, but they're also not worse." - "That lie makes us ignore history and fuels racial hatred." - "The only way out of this is to stop making morality about the color of people." - "Because in our capacity for good and evil, we are all equals."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: White people didn't invent slavery. In fact, they were the first to end it. Yet somehow, saying this is controversial. Watch what happens when someone says it out loud. Speaker 1: The reason there is no slavery in the world today I mean, there's a lot of slavery in the world today, but in the parts of the world where there's no slavery, is because the British Empire ended it. That's why there is no slavery. That is So Well The fact that you are uneducated about history doesn't mean it's funny. So let me educate you now. Let me educate you now. Let me educate you now. I know that the woke narrative and the anti western narrative on slavery well, you're not practicing free speech very well, are you? Let's let's You're not practicing free speech very well, are you? The moment I say something you don't like, you're not practicing free speech very well, are you, sir? Speaker 0: Thank you. Let's be clear. Slavery is evil, but it's an ancient human evil practiced by everyone to everyone. Four years ago, I went to Ghana. I stood in a slave dungeon, where people who looked like me sold people who looked like me to white people. But long before Europeans began the Transatlantic slave trade, there was a Trans Saharan slave trade. For over a thousand years, brown Arab slavers sold millions of black Africans across the Sahara. Then came the Barbary slave trade. In North Africa, Arab and African raiders captured and sold over a million white Christian Europeans. China, Korea, Japan, India, every one of them practiced slavery. Europeans did take slavery to another scale when they came to Africa. But it's not because they were more evil, it's because they had the technology to commit evil on an industrial scale. So which major power stopped slavery first? The British, in large part because of pro human Christian values. The same values America was founded on. The same values that drove white Americans to fight other white Americans to free black Americans in the civil war. Values missing in places like Libya, where today, you can buy a human being for $400. White people aren't better than anyone else, but they're also not worse. Yet, some black people are taught to hate white people, and many white people are taught to hate themselves. We keep pretending evil has a color, as if less melanin means less morality. That lie makes us ignore history and fuels racial hatred. Right now, much of that hatred is aimed at white people. But why should black or brown people care? Because hatred is a hot coal that we hold in our hand, waiting to throw at another. It burns them, but it burns us too. It turns every problem into white supremacy while defending black degeneracy. And when the pendulum swings back, white people react with hostility, and then they defend white degeneracy. The only way out of this is to stop making morality about the color of people. Because in our capacity for good and evil, we are all equals. If you're tired of lies about history, subscribe to my Substack. I cover the stories the mainstream media won't touch. I cut through media bias and teach you how to do it too. The link is in my bio, so drop your email and get exclusive videos I can't post anywhere else.
bennyjohnson
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Saved - August 15, 2025 at 6:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Smithsonian should present the true history of slavery, starting with its origins in Africa over 4,700 years ago and the fact that the U.S. and England were among the first to abolish it. Instead, the museum seems to focus on condemning America and white people. I noticed that upon entering, the emphasis is on LGBTQ+ progress, with little regard for slavery. Exhibits also misrepresent Latino history without acknowledging key figures like Fidel Castro. Moreover, there's a lack of context regarding historical immigration issues and criticism of figures like the author of the Star-Spangled Banner.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

The Smithsonian should teach children the REAL history of Slavery: - Slavery originated in Africa over 4,700 years ago - Slavery was exported from Africa to the West - The U.S. and England were the first to abolish it - 7 million people remain enslaved in Africa in 2025 Instead of teaching about the true origins of slavery and America's honorable role in abolishing it 150 years ago, the Smithsonian Museum of American History attacks America and white people as uniquely evil. @JillianMichaels explains: “When you first walk into the Museum of American History, the first thing you see is a gay flag. And it’s all about gay progress, but that’s not about slavery.” “Then they show a Latino history exhibit blaming the U.S. for Cuban immigration issues. No mention of Fidel Castro, the key reason for that immigration. It’s just the white devil who backed Batista. Huge lie of omission.” “They talk about how we’ve always feared non-white immigration, but there’s no mention that historically people hated the Irish, hated the Eastern Europeans, like Italians. Italians were considered non-white immigrants. That’s a matter of fact.” “Even the Star-Spangled Banner is criticized, they go after the guy who wrote it, calling him a ‘huge racist, a slaver and not an abolitionist.’ There’s no balance, no context.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers criticize treating a 'de minimis time in American history' as a tool for power, urging context beyond 'the honorable sacrifices' that ended slavery and 'America and England were the first to end slavery.' They claim, 'Slavery has existed for five thousand years in Africa. Shockingly, it still exists today,' and question why issue ignores slavery in Africa today. They warn that painting 'one race with this brush' fuels racism, arguing, 'The vast majority of white people weren't bad guys and didn't perpetrate evil' and, 'it's 2% of American whites that owned slaves.' They critique Smithsonian displays: 'not for gay pride month' at the Museum of American History; Latino history with Batista/Cuba and 'no mention of Fidel Castro'; gender testing described as 'genitals' and 'cheek swab DNA test'; and 'The Star Spangled Banner' as 'a racist' with the Betsy Ross flag. They conclude there's 'no balance' in the narrative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On this very short, de minimis time in American history and obsess over it forever, right, and use it for power forever instead of zooming out and looking at, one, the honorable sacrifices that were made by hundreds of thousands of Americans to end slavery, America and England being the first nations to end slavery, and then zooming out on the other side of slavery and looking at the histories of where slavery comes from. We just did that actually on Gronk. Why don't we put it up here? So slavery has existed for five thousand years in Africa. Shockingly, it still exists today, something they ever talk about. You know, you thought you'd you'd assume if they were this obsessed with it, that they would go out in order to advocate against the 7,000,000 people Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: That are in slavery in Africa today. Like in the current present day, in the year of our Lord, 2025. If this is gonna be your your key marquee issue, something that was solved in America one hundred and fifty years ago through the blood of the patriots of America honorably and nobly. You you'd assume if that was gonna be your deal, you'd like go after the slaves in Africa in the current present day. Like, that would first concern you. And also, you'd like you'd you'd be concerned that, like, this was a practice that was exported from Africa to the West. And you'd say, well, hold on. Maybe we should go back to the point of origin and solve slavery there. Right? Because it's still currently happening. But they never wanna have that conversation. Speaker 1: No. It's just only, like, white people bad. And it's no one's not wanting to take responsibility for this. Nobody is trying to erase what happened. But what's alarming is exactly what you're saying. When you paint one race with this brush consistently across the board, everywhere from the Smithsonian to CNN, it Yes. Begets, actually begets racial division and racism. And it's funny, I was just talking to Kaizen Esidu, who's who's often on Piers Morgan. I'm a huge fan of his, and I watched a clip of him talking about how when you only talk about white supremacy and you don't talk about any black degeneracy, it begets white degeneracy because white people start to get mad. And it it, Admiral Karola talks about this. It actually breeds racism Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Within the white community when you do this. And my my point is simply, nothing good comes from this. So let's have a fair and honest and accurate conversation. Yeah. What I'm really trying to understand though, Benny, is why we need to hold on to this narrative. I think that's what's the most alarming. Like I saw this post on X to me, and it was, you're denigrating all of humanity, and trivializing these atrocities and horrors of slavery when you say it's just, it was just 2% of American whites that owned slaves. And it's like, because I'm telling you that the vast majority of white people weren't bad guys and didn't perpetrate evil, that denigrates humanity for you? What the hell are we actually trying to say? It's crazy. Speaker 0: The vast majority is of peoples that were coming to America were coming to America in order to escape some version of serfdom or chattel slavery or indentured servitude, especially, like, when you look at Irish immigration, when you look at the levels Speaker 1: Hold that up for you. Can I can I run you through some of these things at the Smithsonian? Okay. Speaker 0: Love that. Speaker 1: So let let me start with the fact that, first of all, not for gay pride month. When you first walk into the Museum of American History, the first thing you see is a gay flag, and it's all about gay progress, which, listen, as a person in the community, I'm very grateful that we can marry, very grateful we can adopt kids, but it's like, you need to open the front exhibit is like the gays. Like, how about something unifying progress for all Americans? Not about that's not about slavery. So it's like, okay. What's the next thing that that the administration sent me? They sent me an installation of an exhibit about a Latino history of The United States. So it talks about the history of Latinos immigrating to The US, And in particular, when it comes to Cuba, they talk about how because of the United States government backing Batista for financial gain, we begot this mass exodus from Cubans, and they still suffer from it to this day. There was Batista Escambiak? Yes. Did the administration at the time do that? Yes. There's no mention of Fidel Castro, who is the key reason for that emigration, who came in in 1959, who was a communist, which we started killing people, jailing people, no mention of that. So it's just the white devil who backed Batista that begot the whole thing. So, yes, we did it, but it's a huge lie of omission to leave that out. Because that would make it far more balanced portrayal. Right? It goes on and on. Just stop me at any time. It talks about how how we all feared we've always feared nonwhite immigration. And there's no mention of the fact that historically, people hated the Irish, hated the Eastern Europeans. Like Speaker 0: Italians Italians were considered non white immigrants. That's like Yeah. That's a that's an absolute matter of fact, by Speaker 1: the way. Right. Speaker 0: Like, Okay. Know Speaker 1: Yeah. Ready for the next one? Then there's the one on gender testing, and they go on to talk about how it was they perpetrated this essential sexual assault by making these athletes show their genitals. And I'm thinking, this is a cheek swab DNA test. Like, what are you talking about? Like, trying to imply that gender testing isn't fair, and not only that, it's somewhat tied to sexual assault and violation. And and, like, again, not about slavery. And and then it it sort of discusses, like, how it's, bigoted to consider testing for gender in sports. The Star Spangled Banner. They go on to talk about how this guy was, like, a huge racist. Really? And yeah. Oh oh my god. He was a he was a slaver and not an abolitionist. Okay. Hold on. Then you've got I mean, I can literally Speaker 0: keep going. Original Betsy because they had the original Betsy Ross flag. They had the original, like, Betsy Ross and the Star Spangled Ban they had the original Star Spangled Speaker 1: Banner. Star Spangled Banner So they they go Speaker 0: after that guy in the exhibit? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. They go after him in the exhibit, and they're like, the irony is that you would choose this song from this horrible person. And it's just like, okay. I mean, I I get I like, but where's the part about what it means today? There's no balance. That's the argument.
JohnStossel
Posted - December 8, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Saved - December 8, 2025 at 2:29 PM

@JohnStossel - John Stossel

Many act as if slavery was a uniquely American crime. “One reason,” says author Wilfred Reilly (@wil_da_beast630), “is that a lot of black people survived here.” He argues that much of what Americans are taught about slavery is just wrong: https://t.co/GOQvqxPCZj

elonmusk
Posted - December 9, 2025 at 6:23 AM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 6:04 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Yup

@ClassicLearner - Brett Pike

Slavery had been the norm throughout all of history, for thousands of years, impacting all people, including millions of Europeans enslaved in the Ottoman Empire - which had institutionalized the sexual slavery of European women. Yet children are led to believe that slavery was a uniquely American activity. Now why do you think that is?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why public schools focus on the Transatlantic slave trade and not on other slave systems, arguing that slavery was widespread across history and regions. They claim the Ottoman Empire enslaved six hundred years and 5–10 million people, with sexual slavery being institutionalized and slaves sourced from Central Europe, the Balkans, and among Hungarians, Russians, and Ukrainians. They assert the word slave derives from “Slav.” They also assert lengthy slave trades in other regions: the Trans Indian slave trade lasting over twelve hundred years and enslaving 4–10 million people; and the Trans Saharan slave trade lasting over twelve hundred years and enslaving 9–17 million people. The speaker asserts that these systems ended after, not before, the North Atlantic slave trade, and emphasizes that chattel slavery was practiced in all these places. They claim that in 1776 the majority of countries in the world practiced chattel slavery, and that while Europe and the United States were early in abolishing slavery, it continued much longer in the Middle East, Africa, and in places like China, Thailand, and Mongolia. They state that if one looked back to 1776, 90–95% of the countries in the world practiced slavery, a norm for thousands of years. They also state that the United States banned slavery in seven states at a time when the rest of the world had banned it in only seven countries. The speaker contends that the reason these histories aren’t taught is that schools are framed through a Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors, intentionally teaching history out of context as a form of brainwashing designed to make dividing and conquering society easy. They claim that, without historical context, it allows framing the United States as uniquely evil, whereas, in reality, it is Britain, the United States, and the West that are responsible for driving the institution of slavery into extinction. Additionally, the speaker promotes their own work, stating they teach courses on real history and what it means to be an American, and that they write books on the First Amendment and the Second Amendment, inviting readers to engage with their material.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is it that public schools only teach about the Transatlantic slave trade? They don't teach that there was slavery in the Ottoman Empire that it lasted for six hundred years and five to 10,000,000 people were enslaved. That they not only enslaved men, but the most valuable slaves were women. Because sexual slavery was not only permitted, but it was institutionalized in the Ottoman Empire. So they would get many of their slaves from Central Europe, many of their slaves from the Balkans, and they would enslave Hungarians, Russians, Ukrainians, which is why the word slave comes from Slav. And why don't schools teach about the trans Indian slave trade, which lasted for over twelve hundred years and enslaved four to 10,000,000 people. Or the Trans Saharan slave trade, which lasted for over twelve hundred years and enslaved nine to 17,000,000 people. All of which ended. Ready for it? Not before, but long after the North Atlantic slave trade. And yes, chattel slavery was practiced in all of these places. In fact, in 1776, the majority of countries in the world practiced chattel slavery. And where Europe and The United States were early in abolishing slavery, it went on much longer in The Middle East, in Africa, and in places like China, Thailand, and Mongolia. If you went back to 1776, you would find 90 to 95% of the countries in the world practiced slavery, and that had been the norm for thousands of years. And The United States Of America banned slavery in seven states when the rest of the world had only banned it in seven countries. And the reason this isn't taught is that everything in school is framed through a Marxist lens of oppressed versus oppressors. So they intentionally teach our history out of context, which is a form of brainwashing that is designed to make dividing and conquering society easy. Because absent of historical context, it allows them to frame The United States Of America as some uniquely evil place. When in reality, it is Britain, The United States Of America, and the West that is responsible for driving the institution of slavery into extinction. You could learn more about that in my previous video. And this is why I teach courses on real history and what it means to be an American. And I write books on the First Amendment, the Second Amendment and so much more. Check out my private homeschool community, classicallearner.com.
TheRabbitHole
Posted - April 19, 2026 at 11:59 PM
Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:28 AM

@TheRabbitHole - The Rabbit Hole

Thomas Sowell on the complicated history of slavery https://t.co/OIBvHoKxKO

TrueOnX
Posted - May 3, 2026 at 2:35 AM
Saved - May 12, 2026 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying slavery wasn’t a White vs Black invention; more whites were enslaved in North Africa than blacks in America, and white slaves were sold in the Ottoman Empire long after blacks were freed here. It’s a human tragedy across races, and the West didn’t invent it, but it did end it—perhaps or perhaps not. If reparations come, be ready for the greatest wealth transfer in history, because the bill goes both ways. History doesn’t care about feelings. Share if you agree.

@TrueOnX - Noah B. Price

🧠 Thomas Sowell drops the ultimate red pill on slavery: "More whites were brought as slaves to North Africa than blacks brought as slaves to the United States or to the 13 colonies from which it was formed. White slaves were still being bought and sold in the Ottoman Empire, decades after blacks were freed in the United States. "Slavery wasn't a "White vs Black" invention. It was a human tragedy; practiced by every race, on every continent, for thousands of years. The West didn't invent it. The West ended it. or did it? If we're doing reparations... get ready for the greatest wealth transfer in history, because the bill goes both ways. Drop this truth bomb everywhere. History doesn't care about feelings. But let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too.

View Full Interactive Feed