reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - April 1, 2023 at 2:26 AM

Saved - April 8, 2023 at 11:32 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

There are concerns that mRNA vaccines may be added to our food supply. Missouri HB 1169 is a labeling bill that seeks to counter this effort. If passed, it would require gene therapy products to be labeled as such. Lobbyists for cattle and pork associations have confirmed they will use mRNA vaccines in animals. Supporting HB 1169 is our only chance to prevent this. Learn more and vote YES.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Avoiding the Shot Isn't Enough: They Now Want to "Vaccinate" Us Through the Food Supply "Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They're gonna modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines," warned attorney @TomRenz. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such an effort. It's been described as "one of the most controversial bills in history," but all it is – is a labeling bill. If a food product is a gene therapy product, you have every right to know. So, if this bill gets passed, it's a major victory not just for our well-being — but also for discovery, too.

Video Transcript AI Summary

This bill aims to ensure transparency and informed consent regarding gene therapy products and other medical interventions. It requires products potentially acting as gene therapy to be labeled accordingly, and information about potential exposure and shedding to be disclosed. The bill also emphasizes the importance of fully informed consent, including awareness of benefits, risks, and side effects. However, lobbyists, including those representing big pharma and agribusiness, are opposing the bill. The speaker urges support for the bill and criticizes those who oppose transparency and consumer knowledge. The bill's passage would reveal important information about adverse events and the use of gene therapy and mRNA vaccines in food.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This bill does 3 things, right? And I'm gonna read this. Okay? This is a quote from the bill. Any product that has been created to act as or expose to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter or introduce genetic material or genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words potential gene therapy product unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product, reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser, the user of the product, is made aware of the presence of the label. If the product is known to be a gene therapy product the product shall be labeled conspicuously with the words gene therapy product. Okay. What does this mean? All this means folks is that if there's gene therapy products, you get to know about it. It's a it's a labeling bill. It doesn't do anything. We don't say you can't do it. We don't say there's an issue with it. We just say, hey, you got to make sure that consumers know if you're going to screw up their jeans. Sounds pretty simple, right? Pretty simple. Now I want you to remember that because I'm gonna come back to it in a second. I'm gonna tell you the other 2 parts of the bill. There's 2 other parts. I'm gonna read this to you because I don't want it to be misconstrued. The other side is lying about this bill, and I want you to hear it. And I want this bill sponsored in every state. You need to take this fill to your legislature in every republican state and ask them to sponsor it. We're gonna be talking about how and why. Okay. Part 2. Upon written request of any resident of this state, any entity that produces, sells, or distributes a product in this state with the capacity to infect an individual with a disease or to expose that individual to a genetically modified material, including but not limited to vaccines, gene therapies, drugs, and medical interventions, shall provide any and all information related to the ways in which individuals who did not directly obtain or use the product may be exposed to the product or component of the product. Right? What this means, and there's more, it goes on a little bit, but what it means is shedding has to be disclosed, and how shedding works has to be disclosed. And that makes sense because if it's a gene therapy product and it can spread, we have the right to know. I have the right to know if my genetics are being screwed with, don't I? Don't I? Okay. 3rd part. This is super important. Any entity that makes a product available in this state that could in fact transmit to or be absorbed in any individual in any way that would act as a medical intervention, vaccine, drug, or genetic modification shall obtain fully informed consent from all individuals who could be exposed to such product before exposure could occur. Fully informed consent requires, at a minimum, that an individual is made aware of all benefits and risks, including side effects of the product, any adverse events of special interest and any other reasonably possible impacts of the product. Alright folks. Informed consent. That's Nuremberg, right? The Republicans and the Democrats are selling out on this. Let me tell you who's good. Okay. Committee chair Bill Hardwick has been very good on this bill. Holly Jones, really good. You need to thank them. You need to call them. You need to support them. You need to back them, whatever you can do to tell them thank you for their courage because they're getting beat up. My understanding is there's a couple other members of the committee that are looking at backing this, but they've been told outright, don't vote on this. Don't have a vote on it. We're gonna shut it down. They've been told outright by Republicans, by lobbyists, by everyone. What they've done is big pharma bear Monsanto, which has a huge, huge presence in Missouri, went to the ag people, the ag lobbyists, and told the ag lobbyists that that part that says that you've got to call your foods, you know, gene therapy products, you know, you have to label everything. Well, first of all, if the what that means is so then these these lobbyists, they come in, they they say, yeah, we don't want to have to label everything as a gene therapy product. Well, wait a second. Are you tell that means that they're admitting that these GMO foods are affecting your genome. They should be labeled, folks. Why do you oppose it's just a label. Why do you oppose that? Why do you oppose the consumer knowing that there's a gene therapy potential in the product. Folks, Gates, The Who, a ton of these universities, they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of food. They're going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines. Do you know that one of the committee members said that they don't care? They don't care. Apparently they didn't see the Died Suddenly movie folks. Apparently they don't care if you get to give informed consent on a medical intervention. Either that or they're too stupid to understand what's going on. Either way, this person should not be on the committee. I'm deciding whether to name names on that. Folks, let me tell you what's going on here. The lobbyists are telling the farmers that this is going to make the, you know, be a disaster for all their food. It's not. The only thing that this does is make sure that these guys can't put mRNA vaccine therapy into food and then give it to you or transmit it through other mechanisms without you knowing. That's all it does. If a product is a gene therapy product, you have every right to know, but they're trying to make sure that you don't. All this bill does is provide transparency. Are you telling me that Democrat, Republican, left, right, you don't think you have a right to know when a medical intervention is used on you, you don't have a right to know if they're gonna change your genetics. That's all this bill does, but the Republicans are selling out. The egg lobbyists are are throwing a conniption over this. Why folks? Why? Why would you have a conniption over this unless you planned on doing it? Why are these people do you know that privately, the the elected officials in Missouri are talking about this as one of the most controversial bills in history. They said privately, a number of them has said to me, oh, we've never seen the lobbyists so upset. Why do you think that is folks? Why do you think that is? These lobbyists have been told their butts on the line. If they get the if this bill keeps going, they're going to be fired. Folks, we, the people need this bill. What person in Missouri is going to oppose a transparency bill? What person in Missouri? Listen, let's say you're a hardcore leftist. Let's say you are die hard in support of these vaccines. Don't you think you should know before you've taken them? Do you oppose knowing before you've taken them? Are you okay with them integrating it into your food? Are you okay with that? I'm not. I'm not at all. I mean, this is insane, folks. And, these people, they're hiding it. I, they're, they're, they're just trying to cover this up. Folks, if this bill passes, then the truth about adverse events of special interests, the truth about informed consent, all this, all of this stuff comes out. Right?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Learn more here: https://dailyclout.io/renz-missouri-house-testimony-biotech-admits-gates-gmo-factory-food-is-a-gene-therapy/

Renz Missouri House Testimony - BioTech Admits Gate's GMO Factory Food IS a Gene Therapy They now want to "vaccinate" us through the food supply. Here's how we can help put an end to it. dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I mistagged Tom. You can find him here: @RenzTom. Please give him a follow and thank him for leading the charge on this issue.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full Video: https://rumble.com/v2foga8-tom-renz-missouri-and-mrna-food-supply-part-1.html

Tom Renz | Missouri and MRNA Food Supply (part 1) If you care about the #lies that #Fauci has put forward you care about Missouri House Bill No. 1169. It's the most straight forward, simple bill ever put forward, only 2 pages in length, and all it re rumble.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vote YES in favor of HB 1169. Click on "introduced" under Bill Texts to read the bill. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products

HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products billcam.dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BREAKING NEWS: the lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH. WE MUST SUPPORT #Missouri #HB1169. It is LITERALLY the ONLY chance we have to prevent this… NO ONE knows the the… Show more https://t.co/dae08m7h13

@VigilantFox — The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Posted - April 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM

Saved - April 8, 2023 at 11:31 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Attorney Tom Renz warns that mRNA vaccines could be surreptitiously inserted into the US food supply. Lobbyists for cattleman and pork associations confirm that they will use mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to require labeling and disclosure of any product with gene therapy qualities, informed consent, and disclosure of adverse events. The bill is easy to pass and hard to oppose, but has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history. Transparency and disclosure are all that is being asked for.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Surreptitious Insertion of mRNA Could Be in the U.S. Food Supply RIGHT NOW "What's happened is, we found out that they're actually already doing this [inserting mRNA in food] in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products, if they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply," stated Attorney @RenzTom. "We don't know where our food is coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And that's just in meat; we don't know about in vegetables."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hospital 11 69 does 3 things. And I'm I'm getting your answer here, but it essentially requires that you disclose if any product has a gene therapy quality. It requires that you talk about how those gene therapy, aspects of the product could be transmitted to other people. And then it requires in full a full informed consent before someone gives you a medical intervention or a gene therapy. So 3 things that are completely non controversial and there's no problem. Well, we go and we're working on this bill and we're getting massive opposition to informed consent. We're saying, who the heck would oppose this? Well, it turns out that big pharma, through the ag lobbyists, were opposing this massively. And the reason that they're doing it is because, just I started doing this research. And going back to 2000, I've actually found documents going back to the mid nineties where they've talked about integrating vaccines into foods. Initially, this was done Speaker 1: Hey, Thomas. One one second. Just I just wanna clarify something. So you're saying that they're currently doing this, Or is this bill to just prevent it from happening in the future? Speaker 0: Well, that's the thing that was shocking to me is initially, I thought this was to prevent it. But we got word from the pork and cattle some lobbyists who I can't talk about names because these guys would get wire in a heartbeat that they were planning on using mRNA gene therapies, like in the immediate future. Speaker 1: Well, so I started doing some research and it turns out just there is a product called Seqevity Speaker 0: on the market from Merck that I'm I'm looking right here. It says, Seqevity harnesses IMR or RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines, in swine. It's there. Not only is it there, but it appears that the technology is getting to the point where they can be transmissible from these animals to people. Just we have I also have and Peter McCullough confirmed this for me. He's looked at this. And he actually tweeted, and I'm just gonna read his tweet. He says, Chinese successfully reloaded cow's milk with mRNA, and it was absorbed into the GI tract of recipients. Concerns about surreptitious insertion of mRNA into the food are valid, must be stopped. Just what's happened is is we found out that they're actually already doing this in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products. If they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply. We don't know where our food's coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And, we that's just in meats. We don't know about in vegetables. Speaker 1: So we just got about a minute before we go to break. But if you could just walk through real quick who you said the largest just of opposition to this bill are, because maybe we can kinda reverse engineer out of that what the real issue is. Like I said, about 30 seconds. Speaker 0: Just Bayer Monsanto is located in Saint Louis and they're driving a lot of this. Bayer bought Monsanto, the largest seed producer on the planet, and they're engineering this into the seed, and, you know, maybe into the cattle and into other things. But big pharma is essentially using the lobbyists. Cattlemen associations fighting it hard. Farm bureaus, just a lot of the chambers of commerce says they're fighting this, because they don't want informed consent. I it's which is beyond me.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you don't want gene therapy surreptitiously inserted into your food, please share this information far and wide to spread awareness. To learn more about what you can do and Missouri HB 1169, please follow the link below: https://dailyclout.io/eat-your-vaccines-mrna-gene-therapy-is-coming-to-the-food-supply-this-month/

Eat Your Vaccines: mRNA Gene Therapy Is Coming to the Food Supply THIS MONTH They've given up on a needle in every arm. Now they're coming for what you eat. dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH,” warned attorney @RenzTom. mRNA food is coming — and it's coming fast.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines,” he warned in this video.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such practices. It’s been described as “one of the most controversial bills in history,” but all it is – is a labeling bill. It doesn’t ban anything. You have every right to know if a food product is a gene therapy product.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, if this bill gets passed, it’s a major victory for informed consent and, in all likelihood, our well-being. The entire two-page bill is available to read on DailyClout (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bill-texts/uNWj5bOW6b). Here’s an excerpt:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

"Any product that has been created to act as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product, or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product" unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product. "Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser or user of the product is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product". The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed in favor of disclosure of any potential gene therapy product."

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The bill was written in a way “to be as easy to pass and as hard to oppose as possible,” conveyed attorney Renz. Missouri HB 1169 does three things:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1.) “It requires labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2.) “It requires that if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘hey, how does this spread? ‘Does it shed? ... Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3.) “It requires informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … And it requires informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So, this isn’t difficult,” stressed attorney Renz. “I don’t think this is a Democrat bill or Republican bill. It’s sponsored by a Republican (Rep. Holly Jones) but should be universally supported.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

However, “[t]his has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history,” he lamented. “All we’re asking for is transparency and disclosure.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Now, pharma can’t come out and oppose transparency and disclosure. So they would need the agricultural community to have their back. Remember, Bill Gates and the CCP are the two largest holders of agriculture in America.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So these guys [Gates & CCP] throw money at these guys [agricultural associations] — buy off these guys. They’re not representing the local farmers,” attested attorney @RenzTom.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But here’s the reason this bill is so important. If attorney Tom Renz helps pass Missouri HB 1169, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information (is gene therapy in my food?) apply globally.” he explained.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“So if we can win in one state, the truth in Missouri is the truth in Iowa. So we’ve got to get everybody on the planet calling these guys, telling them you got to pass this — you got to stand for we the people. All it is – is transparency and disclosure," he said.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

"We don’t even ban it. They can still make their poison foods. I just need to know if I’m eating them," @RenzTom expressed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, whether you’re in Missouri, Iowa, the United Kingdom, or Australia, you need to help push HB 1169 across the finish line. Because as @RenzTom said, if the bill passes in Iowa, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information apply globally.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, share this bill (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products) on social media, call your local legislators — ask your representatives why a bill similar to HB 1169 is not being discussed in your neck of the woods. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products)

HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products billcam.dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They’ve already given up on a needle in every arm. Make them do the same when it comes to inserting gene therapy into your food.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - September 27, 2023 at 5:12 AM

Saved - September 27, 2023 at 5:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Food fraud exposed: Ground beef in the US contains a filler known as pink slime. This cheap substitute, made from beef trimmings sprayed with ammonia, is added to maximize profits. Despite being banned in 30 countries, it doesn't have to be labeled. Whistleblowers warned against it, but were overruled. The decision-maker, former undersecretary Joanne Smith, later joined the board of the company profiting from pink slime. This shocking revelation highlights the dangers of our manufactured food.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Your Food Is Fake, It’s Manufactured To Maximize Profits & It’s Borderline Poisonous. Some Of America’s Food Is So Bad It’s Banned In 30 Countries “And now a startling ABC News investigation. A whistleblower has come forward to tell consumers about the ground beef a lot of us buy at the supermarket. Is it what we think it is or is it padded with a filler the whistleblower calls pink slime?” “ABC's senior national correspondent Jim Avella set out to get answers. Gerald Zernstein grinds his own hamburger these days. Why? Because this former USDA scientist, now whistleblower, knows that 70 percent of the ground beef we contained something he calls pink slime. ‌ Beef trimmings that were once used only in dog food and cooking oil, now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe to eat, and then added to most ground beef as a cheaper filler. It was Zernstein who in a USDA memo first coined the term pink slime, and is now coming forward to say he won't buy it. ‌ It's economic fraud. It's not fresh ground beef. It's a cheap substitute being added in. Zernstein and his fellow USDA scientist Carl Custer both warned against using what the industry calls lean, finely textured beef and is widely known now as pink slime. But their government bosses overruled them. Why didn't you consider it beef? Because it was a salvage product. Leftovers been heated at low temperature and the excess fat spun out. Here's how it's done. Those waste trimmings are gathered, simmered at low heat to make it easier to separate fat from muscle, put in a centrifuge and spun to finish the separation. ‌ Next, the mixture is sent through pipes where it's sprayed with ammonia gas to kill bacteria and finally compressed into bricks and flash frozen for shipment to meat packers and grocery stores where it's added to most ground beef. And it doesn't have to appear on the label because over objections of its own scientists, USDA officials with links to the beef industry labeled pink slime meat. The undersecretary said, it's pink, therefore it's meat. ‌ ABC News has learned the woman who made the decision to okay the mix is former undersecretary of agriculture Joanne Smith, millions of dollars for Beef Products Inc., the makers of pink slime. When Smith stepped down from USDA, BPI's principal supplier appointed her to the board of directors, where she made at least $1.2 million over 17 years. She did not return our calls for comment. BPI says it had nothing to do with her appointment, and the USDA says while legal then, under current ethics rules, she could not have immediately joined that board. ‌ Jim Avila, ABC News, Washington.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A whistleblower has revealed that 70% of ground beef sold in supermarkets contains a filler known as pink slime. This filler is made from beef trimmings that were once used in dog food and cooking oil, but are now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe for consumption. The whistleblower, a former USDA scientist, calls it an economic fraud and a cheap substitute. Despite warnings from scientists, the USDA approved the use of pink slime, labeling it as meat. It was later discovered that the decision was made by a former Under Secretary of Agriculture who had financial ties to the company producing pink slime.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And now a startling ABC News investigation. A whistleblower has come forward to tell consumers about the ground beef a lot of us buy at the supermarket. Is it what we think it is or is it padded with a filler the whistleblower calls pink slime? ABC senior national correspondent Jim Avila set out to get answers. Speaker 1: Gerald Dernstein grinds his own hamburger these days. Why? Because this former USDA scientist, Now whistleblower knows that 70% of the ground beef we buy at the supermarket contains something he calls pink slime. Beef trimmings that were once used only in dog food and cooking oil, now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe to eat, And then added to most ground beef as a cheaper filler. It was Zernstein who, in a USDA memo, first coined the term pink slime, And is now coming forward to say he won't buy it. Speaker 2: It's economic fraud. It's not it's not, fresh ground beef. It's a substitute. It's a cheap substitute being added in. Speaker 1: Zernstein and his fellow USDA scientist, Carl Custer, both warned against using what the industry calls Lean, finely textured beef and is widely known now as pink slime. But their government bosses overruled them. Why didn't you consider it beef? Speaker 2: Because it was a salvage product. Leftovers. Fat That had been heated, low temperature, and the excess fat spun out. Speaker 1: Here's how it's done. Those waste trimmings are gathered, simmered at low heat to make it easier to separate fat from muscle, put in a centrifuge, and spun to finish the separation. Next, the mixture is sent through pipes where it's sprayed with ammonia gas to kill bacteria, and finally compressed into bricks, And flash frozen for shipment to meatpackers and grocery stores where it's added to most ground beef. And it doesn't have to appear on the label Because over objections of its own scientists, USDA officials with links to the beef industry labeled pink slime, meat. Speaker 2: The undersecretary said it's peak, therefore it's meat. Speaker 1: ABC News has learned the woman who made the decision to okay the mix Is former Under Secretary of Agriculture, Joanne Smith. A call that led to 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars for Beef Products Inc, the makers of pink slime. When Smith stepped down from USDA, BPI's principal supplier appointed her to the board of directors, where she made at least $1,200,000 Over 17 years, she did not return our calls for comment. BPI says it had nothing to do with her appointment. And the USDA says while legal then, under current ethics rules, she could not have immediately joined that board. Jim Avila, ABC News, Washington.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 7, 2024 at 3:31 PM

Saved - January 7, 2024 at 4:26 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Texas rancher Shad Sullivan warns of a planned food shortage and depopulation facilitated by the US government. State officials are euthanizing animals, plowing crops, and dumping milk. Sullivan urges producers and consumers to take action and calls for food to be stocked on shelves. The importation of beef from Namibia contradicts the push to euthanize harvest-ready cattle. The food supply is in trouble, and everyone should be concerned.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Texas American Rancher Says US Government Facilitating Plans For A Planned Food Shortage & Depopulation 🚨 Says Due To State Officials “Harvest Ready Cows Are Being Euthanized, Dumping Out Hundreds Of Thousands Of Gallons Of Milk, Plowing Vegetable Crops From Coast To Coast, Euthanizing Millions Of Chickens, Aborting Sows & Feeder Pigs, Preparing Us To Depopulate” “Hey, everybody. This is Shad Sullivan coming to you from the headwaters of Bitter Creek, Archer County, North Texas. We have to talk. State officials will be assisting to help identify potential alternative markets if a producer is unable to move animals and if necessary, advise and assist on depopulation and disposal methods. Ladies and gentlemen, we are plowing under vegetable crops from coast to coast. We are euthanizing millions of chickens. We are aborting sows and burying feeder pigs. We are dumping milk by the hundreds of thousands of gallons, and now they are preparing us to depopulate the fat cattle ready to harvest. — Our food supply is in trouble, and I am appealing to producers and consumers across the nation to start calling. Yesterday, the 1st shipment of imported beef from The country of Namibia hit the shores of the United States of America. And yet this morning, they are telling us to prepare to euthanize harvest ready cattle. — It is time we get food on the shelves. Because if you're not concerned about this food supply problem, you better be.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Shad Sullivan, speaking from Bitter Creek in North Texas, addresses the current crisis in the food supply chain caused by the effects of COVID-19. He highlights the need for state officials to assist in finding alternative markets for producers who are unable to move their animals. Sullivan expresses concern over the euthanization of animals, plowing under vegetable crops, and dumping milk due to bottlenecks in the system. He questions the importation of beef from Namibia while American cattle are being prepared for euthanasia. Sullivan calls for the American people to return to work, money to flow, and food to be readily available on shelves.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. This is Shad Sullivan coming to you from the headwaters of Bitter Creek, Archer County, North Texas. We have to talk. State officials will be assisting to help identify potential alternative markets if a producer is unable to move animals And if necessary, advise and assist on depopulation and disposal methods. Ladies and gentlemen, we are plowing under vegetable crops from coast to coast. We are euthanizing millions of chickens. We are aborting sows and burying feeder pigs. We are dumping milk by the hundreds of thousands of gallons and now they are preparing us to depopulate The fat cattle ready to harvest because of a bottleneck created by the effects of COVID. This thing hasn't been created by COVID, but the effects of COVID and the logistics therein, we are in trouble. Our food supply is in trouble, and I am appealing to producers and consumers across the nation to start calling. Yesterday, the 1st shipment of imported beef from the country of Namibia hit the shores of the United States of America. And yet this morning, they are Telling us to prepare to euthanize harvest ready cattle. Am I the only one that sees a problem in this? It is time we get the American people back to work. It is time we get money flowing. It is time we get food on the shelves. Because if you're not concerned about this food supply problem, you better

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 2, 2024 at 2:19 AM

Saved - February 2, 2024 at 3:33 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A proposed bill for mandatory electronic identification ear tags is causing concern among small farmers. They believe it will burden them with additional costs and infrastructure, ultimately leading to the shutdown of family farms. They see this bill as a way for the government and big corporations to gain control over their businesses. They urge people to oppose the bill and reach out to their congressmen and cattlemen's associations to voice their opposition.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 NEW Legislation Proposed That This American Farmer Says Will Eventually Shut Down & Put ALL Family Farms Out Of Business The Mandatory Electronic Identification Ear Tag Bill Would Allow Government & Environmental Groups Who Attribute Livestock To Climate Change To Receive Information On Small Farms Cattle “Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems” “So the big thing now is the big controversy on in the pharma community — The Eectronic Ear Tag, The Mandatory Electronic Ear Tag Bill that's out there. And I'm a little bit offended to see some small time farmers who actually supporting this. It's offended is not the right word. Baffled is a better word. Never let government controls way too much of our food supply already, and this is like any bill put through legislation. It's masked with good intentions. But what it really is is a Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. That's all it is. It it's meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business. If you ever are confused about a bill, always say no. If if governments want more control, it should always be no. But in this, if you're ever confused about, like, the true motivations behind the bill, look who's supporting it. Who supports this? Big politicians and big gov and big, uh, corporation corporate farmers corporate ranchers. You know? Get, um, they support it because what it's gonna do, it's gonna allow them to put a lockdown on us, put us out of business. Don't let government tell you how to run your business. Don't invite them into it. And because of the pushback, they're trying to make some of the language say, uh, voluntary. But even that is just the way to get their hooks in. It's just the way to seek it in, to normalize it, and then in a few years, to make it mandatory. That's how government always works. Don't let them do this. Don't fall for this. Call your congress Thomas Massie is really good on this, the Kentucky congressman. The call your congressman. Call your legislator. Do whatever you can. Tell them no. No way. Call your cattlemen's associations. If they if they stand behind this, bulk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker expresses concern over the mandatory electronic ear tag bill in the pharma community and on TikTok. They are puzzled by small-time farmers who support it, believing that it is a Trojan horse to control and put small farmers out of business. They advise always saying no to bills that increase government control and urge listeners to look at who supports the bill to understand its true motivations. The speaker warns against allowing government interference in running businesses and predicts that even if the bill starts as voluntary, it will eventually become mandatory. They encourage contacting representatives and cattlemen's associations to oppose the bill.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So the the big thing now is the big controversy on in the pharma community and on TikTok is the, the electronic ear tag the mandatory electronic ear tag bill that's out there. And I'm a little bit offended to see some small time farmers who, actually supporting this. It's offended is not the right word. Baffled is a better word. Never let government controls way too much of our food supply already. And this is like, any bill put through legislation. It's masked with good intentions, but what it really is is a Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. That's all it is. It it's meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business. If you ever are confused about a bill, always say no. If if governments want more control, it should always be no. But in this, if you're ever confused about, like, the true motivations behind the bill, look who's supporting it. Who supports this? Big politicians and big gov and big, corporation corporate farmers, corporate ranchers. You know, get, they support it because what it's gonna do, it's gonna allow them to put a lockdown on us, put us out of business. Don't let government tell you how to run your business. Don't invite them into it. And because of the pushback, they're trying to make some of the language say, voluntary. But even that is just a way to get their hooks in. It's just a way to seek it in, to normalize it, and then in a few years to make it mandatory. That's how government always works. Don't let them do this. Don't fall for this. Call your con Thomas Massie is really good on this, the Kentucky congressman. But call your congressman. Call your legislator. Do whatever you can. Tell them no. No way. Call your Cattlemen's Associations. If they if they stand behind this, bulk.

@AwakenedOutlaw — AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Posted - March 2, 2024 at 9:04 PM

Saved - March 3, 2024 at 4:21 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The first post discusses the need for legislation to prohibit the serving of human flesh without the recipient's knowledge. It mentions that this reality will anger and disgust people who have eaten at the establishments involved. The second post warns readers to prepare themselves, while the third post provides a source for more information.

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

👀 Seems pertinent. Now stop for a moment and consider WHY this even has to be floated legislatively. The unfortunate reality behind this, along with the brands/restaurants involved, will both piss people off AND make them sick to their stomach thinking of all the times they've eaten at the establishments involved. 😬

@gemstatebrian - Brian Almon

Rep. Heather Scott presents H522, prohibiting the serving of human flesh to unknowing recipients. #idpol #idleg https://t.co/XWM61mdZhN

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Brace yourselves. #LongPig https://t.co/kwLW0YJ6x2

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Sauce: https://legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/billbookmark/?yr=2024&bn=H0522 h/t @MagicalMom73 https://t.co/Sgq9gcc3Q2

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 25, 2024 at 11:25 AM

Saved - March 25, 2024 at 12:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The mandatory electronic ear tag bill for cattle is causing concern among American farmers and Rep Thomas Massie. They believe it could lead to the banning of cattle and the end of independent producers. The bill would allow government and environmental groups to access information on small farms' cattle, increasing costs and potentially giving control to big corporations. The tracking of cattle is seen as a threat to private property rights and could lead to further regulations in the name of climate change. Lobbyists received $15 million to implement this tagging system, which is not authorized by any law.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I’ve Been Blowing The Whistle On This For Months, The Electronic Ear Tag For Cattle Bill VERY IMPORTANT 🚨 Not only do American farmers say this could put ALL small family farms out of business but Rep Thomas Massie says this is the first step to BANNING cattle - “The key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country” - The mandatory electronic identification ear tag bill would allow government & environmental groups who attribute livestock to climate change to receive information on small farms cattle - Smaller operations will struggle to shoulder the cost and infrastructure to maintain these systems - Said by farmers I’ve shared “A Trojan horse to get in and control the small farmer. It’s meant to come in, put the small farmer out of business - The rule would increase marketing costs because whenever an animal is sold, it would have to be traced and recorded “Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, uh, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to, quote, stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, um, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China. One's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. —What's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country, and it is a pro a private property rights issue that, uh, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID, and data monitor monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And, under the rules of sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, uh, they can come and they can monitor, measure, report, and verify everything that's going on your on your farm or ranch. And then it's maybe down the road in the name of climate change, they can come and, uh, uh, dictate to you the rules of their production, which are subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.” Congressman Thomas Massie posted on “Hidden in this week’s Omnibus: Lobbyists got $15 million dollars to implement ELECTRONIC TAGGING of all cattle in the US. No law authorizes this! It will be used by the GREEN agenda to limit beef production, and by the corporate meat oligopoly to DOMINATE small ranchers. Massie, who sponsored the PRIME Act (which would allow meat from custom exempt slaughter plants to be marketed in some instances) shared the language, apparently directly from the omnibus bill: “The agreement directs the Department to continue to provide the tags and related infrastructure needed to comply with the Federal Animal Disease Traceability rule (9 CFR 86), including no less than $15,000,000 for electronic identification (EID) tags and related infrastructure needed for stakeholders to comply with the proposed rule. “Use of Electronic identification Eartags as Official Identification in Cattle and Bison.” (88 FR 3320), should that rule be finalized.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The left wants to tag cattle for a potential ban, while the right sees it as a money-making opportunity. Concerns about private entities benefiting and industry verticalization arise. The tracking of cattle is viewed as a threat to independent producers and private property rights, drawing parallels to European practices and potential land seizures under the guise of climate change. This monitoring could lead to third-party control over production, posing a danger to liberty.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, you know, the left wants to ban cattle. And before you can ban anything, you need a registry. You need to know where it's at and who owns it, and that's why they want to tag cattle. We've seen it happen in Europe. Now on the right, you've got some cronies who stand to make some money from these ear tags. They're the ones who get the $15,000,000, earmark. It doesn't go to USDA. It's going to quote stakeholders. That is a code word for private entities are getting a handout. And, what they'll do, they'll verticalize the industry with this. The big corporations, you know, you just talked about China. There are 4 corporations control meat processing in United States. One's owned by China, one's owned Brazil by Brazil. American ranchers will be working for those organizations if this tracking goes through because they'll verticalize the industry. Shadi, what's your response to this tracking of cattle? Are you concerned as well? Speaker 1: Oh, yes. I am. It is, the key that opens the door to end to the end of independent producers across the country. And it is a private property rights issue that, we really have to consider here. When we start talking about RFID, EID and data monitoring of farmers and ranchers and their cattle herd size, we open up to what the door to what is going on in the European Union. And under the rules of sustainable sustainable development, we know that the RFID, has led to a land seizure in the name of climate change. So once we open that door, there's no going back. And, they can come and they can monitor, climate change, they can come and, dictate to you the climate change, they can come and, dictate to you the rules of their production, which is subjective on a from a third party verification, and it is extremely dangerous to private property rights. This is a liberty taker, not a liberty maker.

@WallStreetSilv — Wall Street Silver

Posted - March 28, 2024 at 9:55 AM

Saved - March 28, 2024 at 11:53 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In Oregon, the new CAFO bill is causing concern as it targets local producers, farmers, and small businesses. Non-compliant farms face closure, which could cost farmers a significant amount of money. Many view this as an attack on small businesses and local producers, urging for resistance.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

"In the state of Oregon they are going after shutting down local producers, farmers, and small businesses due to the new definition of this CAFO bill" "Now if they come to your farm and you are not up to their code, they will SHUT YOU DOWN" "It's going to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fix everything and farmers don't make a lot of money" "This is an ATTACK on small businesses and local producers" "This is something we need to stand and fight back against" 🚨🚨🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary

Oregon is shutting down local farmers and small businesses under a new CAFO bill, requiring costly upgrades to meet new regulations. This will hurt small businesses and benefit big corporations. We need to fight back against this attack on local producers. Stand together and share this message to spread awareness.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In the state of Oregon, they're going after and shutting down local producers, farmers, and small businesses due to the new definition of this CAFO bill. Now a CAFO is a confined animal feeding operation that covers everybody that raises livestock. They're making them dig new trenches, new water treatment plants, and concreting all their corrals the animals are being fed on. Now if they come to your farm or where you're producing your your livestock and you're not up to their code, they will shut you down until you get it fixed. The thing about this is is it's gonna cost 100 of 1,000 of dollars to fix everything, and farmers don't make a lot of money. We're not rich, and they know this. So it's an attack on small businesses and local producers to make everything go upstream and upscale back to the big businesses and the big packers. This is something we need to stand up and fight back against. So if you're in the state of Oregon, I am with you. Everybody that's with me, make sure you share this around, get the information out there.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 4, 2024 at 2:41 AM

Saved - May 5, 2024 at 8:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

American farmers are facing a dire situation as foreign countries own our meat industries. The average return for feeding cattle in the US has been negative for 23 years. Small farms are disappearing, and the hog industry has already lost 90% of independent producers. The largest pork producer in the US is Chinese-owned. While reversing the hog industry's situation may be difficult, we can still prevent the same fate for the cattle industry.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Farmers Are “Reaching The Point Of No Return” Due To US Gov Allowing Foreign Countries To Own Our Meat Industries They’re averaging negative $24 per head & will soon be OUT OF BUSINESS “The largest pork producer in the United States of America is Chinese owned - We're paying to fight ourselves - We’re paying to destroy our own industry When the USDA's own data shows that the average return to feeding cattle in America is a negative $24 per head per month for the past 23 years. We're reaching the point of no return. Yes. When it's game over. We're at a tough point because we're losing so many small farms and ranchers and yet we have to change it back even if we were to start today and go we could change anything we wanted overnight and change these rules to apply back competition it's going to take a lot of time and money and effort to change the industry back to where it's competitive and works a little bit more even playing field isn't it? We're reaching the point of no return when it's game over and if you look at our sister industry the hog industry for example four decades ago there were Over 600,000 independent hog producers scattered all across America. Today, we've wiped out nine out of every 10 of them. Now we're down to 60,000. And so there's an industry that is now vertically integrated. So vertically integrated means? Means that the meat packer owns the entire supply chain for the product. So he owns where they grow the hogs, where they butcher the hogs, where they sell the hogs, all the way up to the retailer. And the largest pork producer in the United States of America is Chinese owned, Smith Field Farms. Which should be alarming to consumers as well. It should be alarming, yes. We're not going to reverse that hog industry because it has become so vertically integrated and concentrated and controlled. But what we can do is prevent that from happening to the cattle industry.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The largest pork producer in the US is Chinese-owned, leading to negative impacts on small farms. The hog industry has seen a drastic decline in independent producers due to vertical integration. Smithfield Farms, the top pork producer, is Chinese-owned, raising concerns for consumers. While reversing the hog industry's consolidation may be challenging, efforts can be made to prevent similar issues in the cattle industry.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The largest pork producer in the United States of America is Chinese owned. Basically, check off is we're paying to fight ourselves or paying to is a negative $24 per head per month for the past 23 years. We're reaching the point of no return. Yes. When it's game over. Speaker 1: We're at a a tough point because we've we're losing so many small farms and ranchers, and yet we have to change it back. Even if we were to start today and go, we could change anything we wanted overnight and change these rules to apply back competition. It's gonna take a lot of time and money and effort to to change the industry back to where it's competitive and works a little bit more even playing field, isn't it? Speaker 0: We're reaching the point of no return. Yes. When it's game over. And if you look at our sister industry, the hog industry, for example, 4 decades ago, there were over 600,000 independent hog producers scattered all across America. Today, we've wiped out 9 out of every 10 of them. Now we're down to 60,000. And so there's an industry that is now vertically integrated. Speaker 1: So vertically integrated means? Speaker 0: Means that the the meat packer owns the entire supply chain for the for the hog. Speaker 1: So he owns where they grow the hogs, where they butcher the hogs, where they sell the hogs, all the way up to the retailer. Speaker 0: And the largest pork producer in the United States of America is Chinese owned, Smithfield Farms. Really? Which should be alarming to consumers. Alarming. Yes. Yes. Mhmm. We're not gonna reverse that hog industry because it has become so vertically integrated and concentrated and controlled. But what we can do is prevent that from happening to the cattle industry.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 18, 2024 at 11:52 PM

Saved - May 19, 2024 at 10:48 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

American farming industry has suffered due to politicians prioritizing cheap foreign imports and foreign corporate ownership. Over half a million farms and 165 million acres of farmland have been lost.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

One Of The Most Important Issues In America Doesn’t Get Enough Attention American politicians have destroyed our farming industry by selling us out to cheap foreign imports and foreign MEGA Corporation ownership “We’ve lost 536,543 Farms” “Over a half a MILLION farms, GONE” “At the same time, we've lost a 165 MILLION acres of farmland.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

We have lost over 536,543 farms and 165,000,000 acres of farmland.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We've lost 536,543 Farms. Over a half a 1000000 farms gone. At the same time, we've lost 165,000,000 acres of farmland.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - August 3, 2024 at 1:00 PM

Saved - August 3, 2024 at 2:32 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The US government is set to vote on new regulations this November that could severely impact small ranchers. The proposed mandate requires costly water treatment programs for local butcher shops and large packers, with expenses reaching up to $2.3 million for equipment and an additional $500,000 annually for installation and regulation. This move threatens local food systems and limits consumer choices, pushing people towards large packers that dominate the industry. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this situation. Remember to support American and local producers.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is Serious 🚨 US Government voting on new regulations this November that are so expensive they will force small ranchers out of business Mandating new equipment that will cost up to $2.3 million plus $500k to install and regulate each year “This is an attack on our food system” “So this November, the EPA is gonna be voting on a bill to implement new water treatment programs into all local butcher shops all the way up to the big packers. Now these new water treatment programs are gonna be costing up to $2,300,000 just for all the new equipment and an additional $500,000 to get them installed and regulated into each year. This is an attack on our food system if you were trying to buy locally or from your local producers or from the local butcher shops. They simply do not have the money or the revenue to support this. So in a roundabout way, they're taking away your freedom and your right and our right to sell meat directly to the consumer. They're taking away our rights to buy what we want and consume and put in our bodies what we would like. They're forcing us into a box and forcing you guys to buy from the big packers that control 85% of the industry right now. I'm curious to see what y'all think about this. And as always, guys, buy American and buy local.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

In November, the EPA will vote on a bill to add costly water treatment programs to butcher shops, impacting local producers. This move limits consumer choice and favors big packers. The cost is high for small businesses, potentially restricting access to locally sourced meat. The shift may push consumers towards larger corporations controlling most of the industry. Share your thoughts and remember to support American and local businesses.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So this November, the EPA is gonna be voting on a bill to implement new water treatment programs into all local butcher shops, all the way up to the big packers. Now these new water treatment programs are gonna be costing up to $2,300,000 just for all the new equipment and an additional $500,000 to get them installed and regulated into each year. This is an attack on our food system if you were trying to buy locally or from your local producers or from the local butcher shops. They simply do not have the money or the revenue to support this. So in a roundabout way, they're taking away your freedom and your right and our right to sell meat directly to the consumer. They're taking away our rights to buy what we want and consume and put in our bodies what we would like. They're forcing us into a box and forcing you guys to buy from the big packers that control 85% of the industry right now. I'm curious to see what y'all think about this. And as always, guys, buy American and buy local.

@Tweetadee1926 — HelsOnWheels

Posted - August 11, 2024 at 2:31 AM

Saved - August 11, 2024 at 2:26 PM

@Tweetadee1926 - HelsOnWheels

TO ALL CANADIANS & SHARE If you recall, Health Canada has decided NOT to tell Canadians if they’re eating “Clone Meat” or not! They will NOT label the meat or products made with the clone meat. This was their reply from my email to them https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consulation-food-derived-somatic-cell-nuclear-transfer-clones-offspring-policy-update/scientific-opinion.html @FoodProfessor https://t.co/MzIY3owf2Q

@HawleyMO — Josh Hawley

Posted - December 20, 2024 at 7:53 PM

Saved - December 20, 2024 at 8:48 PM

@HawleyMO - Josh Hawley

After shutting down Missouri plants and taking Missouri jobs, now Tyson Food is trying to silence Missouri farmers and stop them from getting accountability. How about Tyson tells the world instead why it’s using slave child labor in its supply chains https://t.co/pJZqqud1QI

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 25, 2025 at 1:41 AM

Saved - January 25, 2025 at 2:03 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

As a restaurant owner for a decade, I've uncovered a troubling scam involving US beef companies. They exploit a loophole in North Carolina laws, allowing them to label cattle as "natural grass-fed" after just six weeks of grass feeding. These cattle are often sourced from overcrowded, unsanitary conditions in New Mexico, where they consume unhealthy diets filled with antibiotics. After being bought cheaply, they're briefly placed on grass to meet certification requirements. The truth about where our beef really comes from is both shocking and disturbing.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Restaurant Owner of 10 years exposes a shady scam by US beef companies American beef businesses are using a loophole to lie to consumers about “Natural grass fed beef” “There's a loophole in the laws in North Carolina, probably most states to get certified organic grass fed cow, it has to eat grass for 6 weeks. So what they do is they buy cattle from like New Mexico, from desert food lots where they're - Standing 2 feet deep in their own sh*t - They're eating like corn powder with f*cking antibiotics and all kinds of sh*t in it. Super unnatural - They're packed in like sardines. They buy those cow at auction super cheap, skinny ass cows, and then they transport 'em in whatever state they stick 'em on grass in a barn with hay for six weeks. And technically it's a local certified organic grass fed cattle that will blow your motherfucking mind process, that all your organics and all that's all bullsh*t” “You’ll be shocked where your beef comes from.” He tells a story about how he got this inside information and how many places are actually doing this, it’s shocking and disgusting

Video Transcript AI Summary

I started a restaurant with just $30 and food stamps, sourcing everything locally in North Carolina. Many believe in the quality of organic, grass-fed beef, but much of it is misleading. I learned from the owner of a prominent company that they buy cattle from poor conditions in New Mexico, then feed them grass for just six weeks to label them as organic. It took me three years to find a legitimate local farm for my restaurant's beef. I finally discovered Apple Brandy Farms, a family-owned operation in North Carolina with the best, most flavorful beef I've ever had. If you're in the area, I highly recommend them.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm a tell you a little story. Cattle, beef, food. A lot of people don't know anything about where it comes from. So I owned a restaurant for 10 years. Miraculous. I know. I started it with $30 in the bank and a month's worth of food stamps. I don't recommend that business model just for all you entrepreneurs. When it comes to your beef, grass fed, organic, 99% of it is bullshit. At my restaurant, sourced everything locally in North Carolina. The biggest organic grass fed supposedly, like, best company in Asheville is called Hickory Nut Gap. I went to a party that we catered for one of my cheese purveyors, local goat cheese. Great times. We cooked, like, 300 ears of corn, and we were all on mushroom. I never bought the hickory nut Gap meat because it was 10 times the cost of any other beef. I ran into the owner of this company. He was drunk. There are farms way up in the mountains, and I've driven by it many times. And there was never any animals out out there, a couple of goats. I asked him, hey, man. Where do y'all keep the cows? Well, we don't have any cow. How do you sell all this meat? He said, there's a loophole in the laws in North Carolina, probably most states, to get certified organic grass fed cow. It has to eat grass for 6 weeks. So what they do is they buy cattle from, like, New Mexico, from desert food lots where they're standing 2 feet deep in their own shit. They're eating, like, corn powder with fucking antibiotics and all kinds of shit in it. Super unnatural. They're packed in like sardines, dude. I've seen those kind of farms. It's nuts. They buy those cow at auction, super cheap, skinny ass cows, and then they transport them in whatever state. They stick them on grass in a barn with hay for 6 weeks, and, technically, it's a local certified organic grass fed cattle. That will blow your motherfucking mind. Process that. All your organics and all that's all bullshit. Took me, like, 3 years to find a legit local farm for my beef at my restaurant. It's a family owned operation for over a 100 years in North Carolina. The best beef I have ever had, most tender, most flavorful beef. Even the tough cuts like sirloins and the flank the, skirt steaks are usually like rubber. They're straight up butter. The owner is a fabulous guy. He would pull up in his refrigerated truck and bring us pigs, all our cuts. A great company. If you're in North Carolina, look them up. Apple Brandy Farms. Took me years to find that farm that was legit in Asheville, North Carolina. Everybody thinks they're it's all local and organic.

@RINOhunter1776 — Missouri RINO Watch

Posted - February 1, 2025 at 6:01 PM

Saved - February 1, 2025 at 9:23 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Missouri lawmakers are making a significant move with Senator Mike Moon's SB 198, the "Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act." This legislation aims to empower Missouri to resist federal overreach by allowing state courts and the legislature to reject unconstitutional federal laws, preventing state agencies from enforcing such laws, and cutting funding for unconstitutional mandates. The act could challenge federal rules and decisions based on the Constitution's original meaning, potentially setting a precedent for other states. I'm curious about the potential pushback from Washington. What do you think?

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

🚨Missouri’s Bold Move to Nullify Federal Overreach – Will SB 198 Restore State Sovereignty?🚨 🔥 Missouri lawmakers are taking a stand! Senator @realmikemoon's SB 198—the "Restoring State Sovereignty Through Nullification Act"—could make Missouri one of the strongest states in resisting unconstitutional federal overreach. 💡 What is Nullification? It’s the process where a state declares federal actions void if they contradict the U.S. Constitution. SB 198: ✅ Allows Missouri courts & legislature to reject unconstitutional federal laws. ✅ Prevents Missouri agencies from enforcing federal overreach. ✅ Cuts state/local funding for unconstitutional mandates. 🔎 Key Takeaways from SB 198: 🚫 Federal agency rules, executive orders, and treaties can be challenged. 📜 Decisions must be based on the Constitution’s original meaning. 💰 No Missouri tax dollars will enforce unconstitutional federal laws. 🚨 Why This Matters: According to JBS, over 80% of the federal government would be unconstitutional if we truly followed the U.S. Constitution. Missouri’s move could set a national precedent for other states to follow. 💬 What do you think? Is this the future of state sovereignty, or will Missouri face pushback from Washington? Drop your thoughts below! 👇👇👇 #moleg #ShowMeMAGA

Video Transcript AI Summary

Senate Bill 198, introduced by Mike Moon, establishes a process for states to nullify federal actions deemed unconstitutional. Nullification allows states to declare federal laws, executive orders, and court opinions void if they violate the U.S. Constitution. The bill empowers the Missouri General Assembly and state courts to review and reject unconstitutional federal actions. It emphasizes that any federal action not aligned with the Constitution is not the supreme law of the land. With many federal laws considered unconstitutional, SB 198 aims to restore state sovereignty and correct the federal government's overreach. The bill is rooted in constitutional principles, particularly the Tenth Amendment, and seeks to ensure that state and local agencies do not enforce unconstitutional federal actions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Surprise, surprise. One of those bills in the senate is from Mike Moon. So this is, SB 198, and this creates a process for nullification of federal actions. If you don't know what nullification is, it's basically where the state says what the federal government has done enacted whether it be in rules or regulations or legislation itself or executive orders is nullified. In other words, has zero effect in our state because we as the legislative body have determined that it does not correlate with the constitution. It's repugnant to that. So, therefore, it has no authority, and therefore, we have no, we have no obligation to adhere to it. And this is a fantastic way of getting back to the sovereignty of the people, because the states are created by the people, and then the states technically created the constitution, which made the federal government. And so the states are technically superior to the federal government in that sense, of course, as long as they don't go out of the constitution. The constitution is the guiding range, but they do have the ability stand up and say, hey. This is not in, accordance or pursuance thereof of the constitution. Therefore, it's not the law of the land, and we will not allow it in our state. We will give no aid to any federal enforcement, and we will not bring any penalties to our people in order to enact that unconstitutional rule, executive order, statute, whatever the case may be. Okay? But what's great about this is so the John Birch Society, these are fantastic individuals that a lot of people call radical. And they're radical because they adhere to the constitution. Go figure. So they actually did a piece on this because they were so excited about it. And I'm just gonna read it to you because I think it does, the best job. It's very short, so no worries. Members of the Missouri General Assembly are seeking to enact one of the strongest and most nullification bills in the country. Reality is is Mike Moon is. Senator, bill senate bill number 198 titled the Restoring State Sovereign Through Nullification Act is sponsored by senator Mike Moon, and it declares, it is declared that federal laws, federal executive actions, and federal court opinion shall comply with the jurisdictional limitations of the United States constitution. It is further declared that any federal action outside the enumerated power set forth in United States constitution are in violation of the peace and safety of the people of this state, and therefore, said acts are declared void and must be resisted. The proper manner of resistance is a state action of nullification of the federal action. So if enacted, s b 198 would create a formal process create formal processes for reviewing the constitutionality of federal actions and rejecting those found unconstitutional, especially authorizing the general assembly and state courts to nullify unconstitutional federal laws. Under s b 198, the scope of which federal actions to review is comprehensive, it defines the federal action as including federal law, a federal agency rule, policy, or standard, an executive order of the president of the United States, an order or decision of a federal court, and the making or enforcing of a treaty. Additionally, the bill expressly state that states that an any federal action can be nullified using the outline processes. When examining the constitutionality of federal actions, s b 198 requires considering, quote, the plain reading and reasoning of the text of the United States constitution, and the understood definitions at the time of the framing and construction in the United States constitution by framers. So we actually have Bouvier's dictionary. Bouvier's law dictionary was actually what was passed by the congress to say that it is basically the the, official reference point of what, the law and the and the language meant when the framers put everything together. Right? And so that's the that's one of the, resources that people should be using when they're trying to figure out what these words mean and not these newer versions that have been edited for an agenda. Alright. So if a federal action is found unconstitutional, under s b 198, that action would be prohibited from being enforced in Missouri by any state or local government agency, and no funds may be used to enforce it. S b 198 is firmly grounded in the text of the US constitution. In particular, article 6 states, this constitution and the laws of the United States, which shall be made in pursuance thereof, shall be the supreme law of the land. Additionally, the 10th amendment makes clear that all powers not granted by the constitution to the federal government are reserved to the states and to the people. Accordingly, any federal action that violates or contradicts the constitution cannot be, quote, made in pursuance thereof and thus is not, quote, the supreme law of the land. Unfortunately, in the last several decades, thousands of unconstitutional laws on the federal state and even local levels have been created and enforced. Unbelievably true. S b 198 follows and enforces both these important constitutional provisions by nullifying unconstitutional federal actions and by restoring state sovereignty. Additionally, exercising these powers is more important now than ever, considering the extent to which the federal government has overreached. If our leaders adhere consistently to the constitution, more than 80% of the federal government would be declared unconstitutional. Did you guys hear that? More than 80% of the federal government would be declared unconstitutional. That's how far we've drifted away from our founding principles. That's why they call it a democracy because there's 4 principles in a republic. The first is an executive, and the and the second is a legislative working together with appointment power, and, the ability to create budgets and, expenditures, and also the courts that are to rule on the constitutionality of any act of government, executive, or the legislative branch. And then the 4th being, inherent individual rights. Okay? Those are the 4 things. If you add anything to those, it becomes a democracy. It starts heading towards democracy. If you take any of those 4 away, it starts going to autocracy. Okay? Autocracy is tyranny. Democracy is mob rule. We are so far off the course, but the good thing is is we absolutely can correct it. So, again, thank you, senator Mike Moon. Maybe one day you'll be our governor. War. And so the American people decided to take over the idea of information.

@RINOhunter1776 — Missouri RINO Watch

Posted - February 11, 2025 at 5:07 PM

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 5:19 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

It’s easy to confirm or debunk information. I shared a Senate Concurrent Resolution urging the federal government to act on something we already have a law for. You can also check with @BenThom59055773 from the Independent Cattlemen of Missouri, who testified on this issue.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

It doesn’t take a lot of effort to confirm or debunk things. Here is the Senate Concurrent Resolution begging the FedGov to do something we ALREADY have a law for (image below). You can also ask @BenThom59055773 who’s a member of the Independent Cattlemen of Missouri - who testified on this very topic.

@stanroth6 - uncompromising

@RINOhunter1776 Show the proof to make this credible. 🤔

@VigilantFox — The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Posted - February 25, 2025 at 3:22 AM

Saved - February 25, 2025 at 9:36 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elon Musk recently sent an email to federal workers asking them to list five accomplishments from the previous week. This initiative aims to identify non-existent employees potentially collecting paychecks fraudulently. Musk warned that failing to respond could be seen as resignation. In another topic, I learned that over 85% of grass-fed beef in stores is imported due to the repeal of the Country of Origin Labeling Law in 2015. Good Ranchers promises transparency, offering meat sourced entirely from the USA, free from antibiotics, hormones, and harmful additives.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: Elon Musk just revealed the real reason for his “What did you do this week?” email—and it’s nothing short of brilliant. Musk instructed federal workers to outline five things they accomplished last week. While it was a move to weed out lazy employees, the real goal was to identify workers who don’t exist. Musk explained: “In some cases, we believe non-existent people or the identities of dead people are being used to collect paychecks. In other words, there is outright fraud.” The email came with a stern warning: failure to respond would be considered a resignation. Let’s see who actually responds. If Musk is right, we could be looking at a massive revelation—there may be far more non-existent people receiving government paychecks than anyone imagined.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Elon Musk asked federal workers to detail their weekly achievements via email, or face resignation. He suspects many employees are lazy, not checking emails, or possibly nonexistent, leading to potential fraud. COVID has exacerbated work-from-home laziness, with people getting away with doing minimal work. It's ridiculous to have to send an email to prove you're working. The real issue is the amount of fraud. Fake positions are created to pay people through the back door. These positions often involve roles with vague responsibilities. If you can take federal holidays off, you're replaceable. Switching gears, if you want top-quality, 100% American meat delivered to your door, check out Good Ranchers. Their rib eyes and fillets are perfectly trimmed. You can get free choice of meat in every box until 02/2026. Go to goodranchers.com/vnn for $25 off, free shipping, and a free gift of meat in every box.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The real reason for his what did you do this week email. You guys have heard all about this. The media has been crying. Why? Why? Why do we have to send an email to prove that we have real jobs? It's so ridiculous. Well, Doge head Elon Musk has revealed the most pressing reason why he instructed an email to be sent out this weekend to federal workers asking them to file a short report explaining what they achieved last week. As we highlighted yesterday, Musk fired off the email adding that failure to respond will be taken as a resignation. It's kind of funny. In a follow-up post, Musk explained that it has become clear that so many workers are so lazy that they're not even checking their emails. In addition, Musk noted that there is a distinct possibility that many workers don't even exist and that the federal paychecks are being siphoned off in a massive fraud scheme. In some cases, we believe nonexistent people or the identities of dead people are being used to collect paychecks. In other words, there is outright fraud, Musk explained in a tweet. And this was in in respond to here's the email. Please respond to this email with approximately five bullet points of what you accomplished last week and cc your manager. Okay, Mike. You and I have actually been talking about this. We we hire a lot of people. We work with a lot of people across quite a few different networks and agencies. Vigilant, obviously, being the most important here. Mhmm. But it is remarkable. Like, how many people just in the modern workforce don't check their email? Like, as if which which means two things. Either they weren't trained in it, which wouldn't make sense for the government. Of course, they'd be given a government, you know, email and they'd be, you know, on a secure server. Or b, they just don't give a shit. Right? Yeah. People that don't check their their communications, it's not because yeah. It's not because of any reason, the fact that they're lazy. He's right. He's he's he's gotten big companies and we have a serious problem with people just being damn right lazy. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think that after COVID, I think people got so used to working from home and they've really been riding that that that gravy train for a long time. And you see us all the time even with the people who are in New York or who are in The Bay who who work in tech. Even once you go into the office, most of these people go into the office and they get an acai bowl and then they do office yoga and then they I don't know, have a a gripe session with their or like a gossip session with their coworkers. So no work is actually being done, but I think that COVID working from home actually exacerbated this problem. But now, Elon, yeah, as you mentioned, is is is giving the or the unrealistic expectation that people actually have to do their jobs and then people are freaking out about it. But, you know, I mean the the like, this was bound to happen eventually. It was it was just a matter of time and, know, now it's finally happening and then now everyone's throwing a big fit about it. So Speaker 0: Well, it's just so stupid. I mean, he asked you to send an email. Yeah. Like, I mean, everyone's made the point, but I do think this showcases how much actual fraud there is. If if someone in a senior level position is complaining about this, then I can guarantee you at the at the top of of the list, it's fraud. Right? There's so much fraud going on. And this is what I think happens. This is where I think people are mad. I think I think, Mike, that the way that people are secured back end deals by doing favors is they give them fake positions and they get paid. So it's like, hey Yeah. I can't give you $50,000 transferred into your bank account, but I can get you a $65,000 a year job and get you residual payments for like $5,200, you know, a month or whatever before taxes. Mhmm. And then you don't have to do anything because it's it's in some some vague department. So I do think there's a lot of pay for play scheming going on here and I don't think that they asked this question just to be a dick. It was actually because they saw the fraud and were like, we gotta expose this. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. Yeah. And I mean, as I was saying earlier, mean, it's like that office space joke. It's like Yeah. So so what would you say that you actually do here? Because I mean, you know, even even working corporate America, I remember one of my first corporate jobs going in there, like, seems like a lot of positions are just made up. It'll be like assistant director to the regional manager, adviser, like, it's just stuff that like isn't needed, but obviously when it's getting paid for by the taxpayer, it's not a private business where you have to make sure that you're making money because they always have a taxpayer that can bail them out. So it's different. Speaker 0: Like, if you get president's day off, you don't have a real job. Because that means you're replaceable. Like, if you can just take federal holidays off Mhmm. Like, if if your job doesn't require, like, planning to take time off, you don't have a real job. And I mean that genuinely, like, you're replaceable, so you should be careful. Doesn't mean you're not doing real work. It just means that, you know, you're replaceable. Now, obviously, that being said, guys, listen to this. You guys know that we're all trying to be healthy around here, and you gotta skip the takeout. Summer's coming, and you gotta have high quality meals, particularly protein. What if I was to tell you about the top quality 100% American meat that you can get straight to your table without even having to go to the store? You know, Good Ranchers, I've been using it for a while with my family. I got my new I got one of those black stones, you know, the they're they're what are they called? What's the top called? Speaker 1: The flat top? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's the flat grill. Yeah. It's the flat top. Right? And I'm pretty sure they're made of cast iron. And, oh my gosh. When you get the rib eyes and the fillets from Good Ranchers, they're perfectly trimmed, have the the exact right amount of marbleization. I hit it with k. This is this is my go to. I know this might be not be everyone. So I put a little Worcestershire sauce. Right? Is that how you say it? Worcestershire? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's debatable, but Speaker 0: Yeah. Worcester sauce, right, for a binder. Then I put on this is this new dry butter seasoning from Costco that I've been using for a couple years, but it's like so it has no calories, so I don't have to actually use the butter. Right? It's kind of like keep keep the calories off. The dry butter seasoning with a little bit of salt, little bit of pepper, And then I throw it on the grill, flip it over, do it, you know, a double sear. And then I add some some sugar free teriyaki sauce. And I do that with some asparagus, some corn. Okay. I've had steaks before. And the only place I could say that probably had steaks that tasted this good was at Eddie V's or maybe capital grill Speaker 1: Mhmm. Which is Speaker 0: pretty damn good. Speaker 1: Yeah. Really good. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: Okay. But the reason why this food's even better is it's hormone free, antibiotic free, and with some of their other foods that might have, you know, like their chicken nuggets, it's actually seed oil free, which is huge. Now right now, you can get free choice of meat in every box until 02/2026. So whether it's salmon, ground beef, or chicken breast in every box until 02/2020 head to goodranchers.com/vnn, g 0 0 d r a n c h e r s Com / v n n, and claim this offer. Plus, get $25 off and free express shipping on your order. It's so amazing and it's all grass fed. So look, chicken, salmon, whatever you want. But I've been I've been on the steak kick. If you want perfectly cut, perfect marbleization, the best quality meat delivered to your door, come on. That's easy, easy, easy peasy. Go to goodranchers.com/vnn, promo code v n n, for $25 off your order, free shipping, and free gift of meat in every box. It's awesome, man. I oh, I'm getting hungry.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did you know over 85% of the grass-fed beef in stores is imported? That’s because the Country of Origin Labeling Law was repealed in 2015. So now, meat can be packaged here in the US and earn a “Product of USA” label, even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. The truth is, much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things you don’t want—antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But at Good Ranchers, transparency isn’t just a buzzword; it’s a promise. All products at Good Ranchers have trustworthy ingredients. Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in the USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It’s free from hidden additives – there are no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient you can read—and that’s meat. Subscribe to any box at GoodRanchers.com/VNN and use promo code VNN to get $25 off plus a free gift of chicken breasts, ground beef, or salmon for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference in meat quality for yourself at GoodRanchers.com/VNN.

Video Transcript AI Summary

I've been living in and out of Australia and noticed they have better quality meat. That's why I wanted to talk to Jermaine Gill, the chief growth officer at Good Ranchers. They're all about bringing transparency to the meat aisle. Good Ranchers started because the founders couldn't trust the meat they were getting in grocery stores. They source clean products without antibiotics. If you have a local farm you trust, great, but if not, Good Ranchers can help. A big issue is the "Product of USA" label, which can mean the meat was just processed here, even if it was born and raised elsewhere. Good Ranchers only sources meat born, raised, and harvested in the USA, where we have high standards for animal treatment. Plus, they age their beef for at least 21 days! Check them out at goodranchers.com/vnn, use code vnn for $25 off.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys know that I was living in and out of Australia for the last seven years and one thing I noticed besides the fact that they speak a little differently than us and we're the ones who speak correctly when it comes to English is that they did have better quality food particularly when it came to meat. You know, I'm used to being out here when I was younger. You eat whatever you want, pork, you don't think about it. And as you get older, start noticing, like, why is my chicken gray? Why does my my my beef look tan? Like, this stuff is a very serious concern for a lot of people. And in my generation, particularly millennials and younger, the quality of food we realize actually directly relates to the quality of life. And that's why today I wanna talk to an amazing individual named Jermaine Gill. He's the chief growth officer at a company called Good Ranchers where he played a pivotal role in transforming the company from a small pop up shop and a little meat provider to a fast growing DDC meat company in The US. Now Jermaine has been instrumental in scaling the business to where it is today, and he led he led the launch of the operations and ecommerce departments and now oversees the overall growth strategy for Good Ranchers, focusing on new lines of business, product development, and future proofing the company alongside the founder and CEO. Jermaine, welcome to the show. I'm so happy to have you here, man. Speaker 1: Yeah, man. Thanks for having me on here. You know, we're we're excited with partnering people like you, right, that are, you know, trying to get the truth out there because that's that's who we are. Right? That that the basis of of good ranchers is we just we wanna bring transparency to the, you know, the the meat aisle, you know, and try to just keep our customers informed. So, I mean, I appreciate everything that you do as well. Speaker 0: Dude, so let's talk about this. I'm a father of two. I got a wife. I got a I got a crunchy wife, whatever they call it, the the almond the almond mom. We care about food quality. Okay? Because my wife because she's not from America. And in other countries, they have higher quality food. They have things that are banned that we eat every day here and they've access to healthy food pretty much everywhere. And so obviously when we're talking about creating a company that's not just about a product but creating a product that's good for people, that helps people, that's also not just a a luxury. Right? Meat is a necessity. This is something that helps you grow strong. So talk to me a little bit about why you actually, you know, helped Good Ranchers helped start it and grow it. Like, what was the core mission behind this, versus just say letting people get their meat from the store and get whatever is given to them? Speaker 1: Yeah. So Binn and Corley Spell who started, you know, their founders and started the business, you know, they started because, you know, they they they had four kids. They were realizing that they couldn't really trust the meat that they were getting in the grocery store. The same thing you were just talking about. Right? There's antibiotics. There's all these labeling and the mystery. You know, we don't even call it the meat aisle. We call it the mystery aisle because there's so many questions around it. So, they went out to try to source a clean product, a product that they could feed their family. And so out of that pet project, Good Ranchers was born. Right? And so that's why it's so important to, like, trust your meat sources like a good ranchers. Right? We always say, like, if you have a local farm and ranch that you know, buy from them first. You need to support those guys. But if you don't, right, like, allow you know, give us the opportunity to go source the highest quality products, clean products, no antibiotics, those kind of things. And it's really important because what you feed your body is what, you know, your your body's gonna react to. So it's really important that you're trying to feed yourself the cleanest product you can. Speaker 0: Yeah. And you know what? I think it's kind of crazy what this stuff is. It's like like, I I know people don't think, like, why why would I care what meat I have? And, you know, it's kind of crazy when I watch videos about, like, even steak. Right? There is a difference between the marbling in a in a cut of steak versus how the cow was treated whether it was under stress when it died, but this is actually kind of sad stuff. Meaning like meat directly is correlated to the quality of even the animal's life. And so, you know, when it comes to meat, I realize I don't know a lot myself. Every time I learn something, somebody's telling me something crazy and it's hard to sort of sift out, you know, the the lies from the truth. So when you talk about consumer awareness, what do most people misunderstand about the meat they're buying at the grocery store versus getting meat from somewhere like Good Ranchers? What what is the difference or or what are they getting versus what they're getting here? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think one of the big things too is this this labeling issue that we've been running to since 2015, and it's called the COLA law. It's the country of origin labeling law. And if there's one thing that we've gotten behind at Good Ranchers, it's trying to bring awareness to the COLA law. So what it is is that, you know, be any brief brought in here, as long as it's further processed in the in The United States, meaning it's, like, cut, packaged, you can say it's a product of The USA. Our standard and we drew a line in the sand very early on, to say that we would only ever source born, raised, and harvested in The United States Of America. That means that the that the cattle was born here, it was raised here, and it was it was harvested here. Product USA means it could be born somewhere else, can be raised somewhere else. It could be slaughtered somewhere else. But if it's brought over the border and along as it's cut and packaged here, you can slap on that product USA. And I think a lot of consumers don't understand that. Some of the meat that they're getting at the grocery store, a lot of the meat that you're buying online is foreign born. It's imported meat. Right? And so we have they one of the things America has done is we have a very high standard when it comes to how we treat our animals, how they're raised, animal husbandry, all of those things. We have a pretty high standard. We we lead the world in that animal, you know, how we maintain the animals and treat them. And so buying, buying meat from that was born in Harvest USA actually matters. Right? And so that's probably the biggest misnomer that people know. The biggest confusion when somebody goes to meat aisle is they they see that Proc USA with the American flag, and they think, oh, this is a USA product. And the reality is it's just been processed here. It's kinda gross. Yeah. I mean, that's the first Speaker 0: I didn't know Speaker 1: that. Super gross. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's 2015. It it's crazy. I think, I think the last I saw last year, like, 3,000,000,000 pounds of, meat was imported into The United States Of America and purchased. Right? And so, at the end of the day, I know we kinda started off and we talked about Australia does a great job of of, you know, product, but the reality is, like, America has the greatest beef producers in the world. I mean, when you look at, like, a Angus cattle or or something that's been, you know, treated right. Like, you go to any of these high end steak houses, it's typically American beef, and then you'll have some Japanese Wagyu, right, some specialty products. But when it comes to just a pure, beautiful, amazing, well marbled steak, it's gonna be from America. And so that's the difference. The other piece too is I think people walk into a grocery store, and they're thinking like, hey. Why should I buy from a good ranchers when I can go to the walk right down the grocery store or a little butcher shop and buy the product? Right? And the reality is, like, there's some things that we do. Right? Like, one, our sourcing is impeccable. You know, we we very clean product, but then we also age all of our beef a minimum of twenty one days. And that aging process adds that amazing steakhouse flavor, but, also, it makes it really tender. And so that's something that you're not you're never gonna get to get at a grocery store. They don't age their product at all. I mean, they're trying to, like, cut it and get it out of the off the shelf as fast as possible. Speaker 0: Well, look. And this is the crazy thing. Like, this is not even about being bougie because you know there's always people we all want to save money. Right? So this is kind Speaker 1: of what I want Speaker 0: to understand about the financial impact versus you know being on a subscription model and how the the benefit of that besides convenience. Like my wife we have 202 I mentioned in the beginning. Sometimes we honestly do have to Uber Eats, you know, groceries because it's just it's hard for her to, know, get the kids in, get them out when they're so little and, you know, that there's they're fussy or whatever. So that you know, convenience we all get why subscription models exist. But it's like, you know, when you're talking about, you know, this this actual service that's bringing this quality meat that's that has the this we we can trust what's in it. Like, what have you seen genuinely your customers find to be the benefit of sort of subscribing to this? Because to some people, getting, like, meat delivered to your door sounds weird. Right? It just sounds foreign and like, I oh, I don't know. I wanna look at it first. So, like, how does this how does this really work, and how do you guys guarantee that they're actually getting the quality meat besides the fact that it tastes good? Like, how how can we know that we're getting a good product? Speaker 1: Yeah. So I'll give you a couple of things when it especially when it comes to the the economic side of things. One, the largest part of a grocery store that you see food waste in is actually in the fresh or raw meat aisle. Right? So you buy 40% of everything you buy on the in the meat aisle from the grocery store, you're gonna throw away. It's it's like a you know, mean, I've seen this statistic. The first time I saw it, was like, that's gotta be made up. And so we've done some more research. So think about it. You know, the way the grocery store works, you either buy one steak or you're gonna buy that big jumbo value pack with five steaks in it. Right? The most average American families aren't gonna cook that all at one time. So you either cook everything you bought at the grocery store, and then you say, hey. I'm gonna take some home for later. It's gonna be leftovers, and you end up not eating it, throwing away. Or you're like, hey. I'm gonna cook these tomorrow. You throw them in the fridge. You forget, and you end up throwing away. So food waste is a huge thing. So with Good Ranchers, everything is individually packaged, vacuum sealed, and it's already flash frozen. So you take out exactly what you're gonna cook. You leave the rest in the freezer or the fridge, and then you cook that when you're ready. So just by that part alone, we we reduce your food waste significantly. I think the last stat I saw, the average American family ends up throwing away 5 to $600 a year in just raw meat that they bought and didn't use. Right? So that's that's the one first cost saving. Two is like we already triple pre trim all of our chicken and beef before you get it. I I I think you've had the product before. Speaker 0: Oh, Especially yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Like I've had them. I've I've I've not only had it before I was working with you guys on the show, but then I moved to Australia so I was, you know, not getting it. But then I started getting it back here and then even advertise it at lifetime at my gym. They're always like telling people always grabbing it. So it's like, I know it's everywhere and it's all around but Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I I know it's delicious but I'm not gonna lie to you. When I first thought about getting like flash frozen meat sent to my door, it just didn't sound normal. Right? I was like, I'm not used to it and usually people don't do things that they're not accustomed to. I'm I'm being honest and that's what everyone and I talked to them about it, they're like, is it normal? I'm like, it's not just normal, it's actually amazing because yeah, you don't waste the meat. It's in your it's in your freezer and it thaws you put in the fridge, it thaws out overnight and it doesn't lose any texture, doesn't lose any flavor, and you end up having backup meat, is fantastic especially when you're busy. You're like, it's just ready to go. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, yeah, it is it's great. Right? And it's safe too. That's the other piece too. Like, the, like, the way that we package, way we freeze it, it's it's it's safer than you're gonna get at the grocery store. Right? Because, you know, grocery stores, they just do that little plastic piece over the top. You know, air, foreign bodies can get in there. But with us, it's it's so it's like that vacuum seal is so tight that you're good to go. I was what I was saying that was, like, you buy a pound of chicken from the grocery store, you're probably gonna have to trim 10 to 15% of that off, right, because it has fat or little ligament pieces pieces you don't wanna eat. With us, since we've already done the trimming for you, you buy a pound of good rancher's meat, you're gonna get a % of that meat to eat is consumable. Whereas at the grocery store, the of steaks, you know, you'll get the big piece of fat on the top that you have to trim off, or you it's a beautiful steak in the package. You get home, you open it, you flip it over, and it's the butt end of a steak. Right? And it looks terrible. So, like, that's the one thing. We we actually had a chef come in and was like, okay. Let's take a look at our product. How would you do it? If it was a restaurant, how would y'all guys want this piece? Right? Because at a restaurant, you're trying to cut down on trimming and time and all that stuff. So you so if you're gonna buy it, you want it to be perfectly trimmed already. And so that's the standard that we use when it comes to the trimming process. So when you buy a pound of Good Ranchers, it's a % consumable. Whereas if you go to the grocery store, you're you're gonna trim 10 to 20% off 10 to 15 on chicken, you know, anywhere from 10 to 30% when it comes to beef because they like to leave that little fat cap because they're trying to, right, increase the the amount of product that they're selling. Speaker 0: Right. And so okay. So in the end, obviously, if people wanna get me, you guys have got to check it out at goodranchers.com/vnn. You guys can use the promo code v n n. You guys have some pretty amazing deals, especially right now. I know that we get $25 off our order which look. If you have a family, this is really good for you. But if you're a single guy and you're going to the gym all the time, this is even better because you're probably gonna waste meat the most. Right? I mean, if you're a single guy and you just wanna get meat in in your in your freezer, but you also get a free gift thrown in there as well with every box. So make sure you guys check it out, g00dranchers.com/vnn. Use that promo code v n n to get that $25 off. It saves money. That's literally, you know, extra groceries you can buy for for your kids with that $25 saved. And what I like the most is is free shipping because we know Amazon, a lot of these companies got big by offering free shipping, but this is not increasing the cost. Like when you do Prime, you do free shipping and they they they build it and these guys are just like hooking you up with the box delivered straight to your door. So I wanted to ask, you know, to kinda close out here, when it comes to this, what are your favorite meats? It's kinda a weird question. What are your favorite meats from from Good Ranchers? All Speaker 1: of them. I'm just kidding. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. What do you like? Because it's seafood and Speaker 1: stuff. Yeah. I'm a huge rib eye guy. I'm gonna tell you this. I'm a huge rib eye guy. I love rib eyes. I like grill them over open fire or on a cast iron. But I will say this. This is gonna be kinda funny. We have an internal saying. People come for steak, they stay for the chicken. I know that sounds funny, but our chicken is the best chicken you will ever have. It's we only source small birds, so they're like the small they're like they're not those giant pterodactyl birds that you you get at the grocery store where the chicken breast is, you know, this huge two pound thing, and it's woody, and it's, like, not tender. So we we only source small birds. So our chicken is phenomenal. It's very tender. It has, I'm gonna tell you, you're gonna taste the difference in the quality of it. So, like I said, there's that internal saying, people come for the steak, they stay for the chicken. I think hands down, my favorite is the is our chicken breast. I can cook it. No. I I try to eat pretty healthy. I work out pretty pretty hard. So I know, you know, two chicken breasts, I'm gonna get 48 grams of protein with those two chicken breasts, and I grill them, and and I'd probably do every other day. Speaker 0: So Let's go. I'm all in the protein too. I mean, like, it's genuine like, right now, I'm a I'm I'm actually on the middle of a of of starting the cut, but I was you know, I got am up to three plates right on the on the bench. That's pretty good. Like, I mean, we're like Speaker 1: That's great. Speaker 0: We're pushing it. So Speaker 1: On one arm? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. One arm. That's what I tell my wife, one finger. Right? But no. But I but I know how how important it is and I the reason why I like meat is even if you're unhealthy, unhealthy people love meat. But if you're healthy, it's it's really nice to tell you guys if you wanna lose weight in the new year, you guys I'm not telling you to do any diet. We're not making any health recommendations. But if you do if you do decrease the amount of carbohydrates you're taking in especially, you know, processed foods that you're eating high in sugar and you just switch to a bunch of meat from from Good Ranchers and make that the primary caloric intake, you'll probably end up in a deficit which is the only way to lose weight, but usually you end up in a deficit. And so if you wanna lose weight, maybe you're not eating enough meat, get some of these today at goodranchers.com/vnn. I wanna tell you real fast, Jermaine. Thank you so much for coming on, man. I really appreciate you and it's a great product. Can't go wrong with quality meat. Any last words that you wanted to tell the audience to encourage them to check it out and maybe try their first box? Speaker 1: Yeah. Dude, I'm telling you right now, like well, first of all, we have a % money back guarantee. So, like, if you don't like the product or something happens or whatever, dude, we will a % refund you. No questions asked. So that's that's the first thing. We we we stand behind what we believe in. You know? And and our mission is to support our local farms and ranches. Agriculture is the backbone of the of the of our country. It's how we became America. Right? And so, we try to do everything we can to to support those guys. So when you support us, you buy from us, we're not only are we supporting awesome guys like you, but we're also supporting local farms and ranches. So that's the first thing. Second thing is, man, if you're looking for a way for a low calorie high protein, Good Ranchers is the way to go, guys. You know, I I eat it every day. My kids eat it. My family eats it. I don't remember last time I bought some bought some protein from the groceries or meat from the grocery store. So, anyway, go to goodranchers.com. Check it out. Man, dude, thank you for your support. Y'all guys are awesome. We love having awesome partners like you that speak well with the product, but also like the mission that you're behind, man. I just, you know, let's keep let's keep it up. Right? Speaker 0: So Yeah. We gotta cut we got we got we got a country to say if we gotta make America healthy again. So that's that's genuinely the truth, man. Alright, Jermaine. Appreciate your brother. Have a great rest of the day. Speaker 1: You too, bro. Thanks, man. I appreciate it. Speaker 0: Awesome. And to the rest of you guys watching here on Vigilant News, you know, we do go live every morning at 8AM. Yes. I do have a show that is at night, a podcast that is at 8PM and then I have a live show 8AM. Yeah. It is a it is a bit of a of of a time consuming thing but the reason why we do it is because sometimes you gotta put time into things in order to, find yourself being in a position to, getting something of value. And, you gotta invest in yourself. You gotta invest in in what matters and, your body matters. Make sure you check out, goodranchers.com/vnn and get some of these boxes right to your house. Send them as a gift too. This is really great. I was gonna say this from us. A lot of people with kids, like, have a kid in college or something like that and they need food, just ship them a box. Like, I promise you a college student will cry if he gets in a in excitement, just free meat. I remember in college how poor I was. Give them that today. And if you know someone in need at your church or something, this is a great idea to say, hey, I'm gonna send you a good rancher's box, you know. It's a good way to donate and, you know, doing God's work in the new year. Anyway, to the rest of you guys watching, have a great rest of the week as always and may God bless The United States Of America. I'm signing out.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Read More: Elon Musk Reveals the Real Reason for His “What Did You Do This Week?” https://vigilantnews.com/post/elon-musk-reveals-the-real-reason-for-his-what-did-you-do-this-week-email/

Elon Musk Reveals the Real Reason for His “What Did You Do This Week?” Email The plot thickens... vigilantnews.com

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - April 13, 2025 at 11:02 AM

Saved - April 13, 2025 at 10:00 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m highlighting the alarming consolidation in the cattle industry, where four mega corporations now control 85% of beef processing, with two being foreign-owned, including one from China. This shift has drastically affected our profitability and raises serious concerns about food security in the U.S. The government's allowance of such foreign control over our meat supply is troubling, especially given the current geopolitical climate. It’s crucial to recognize the implications of having a significant portion of our food source dictated by a few corporations and foreign entities.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American cattle rancher exposing that they’ve all been sold out, they’re at risk of being run out of business and your meat is being imported - 4 large mega corporations now own 85% of the entire industry - 2 of them are foreign owned - 1 of them is Chinese “50% or more of the beef processing be controlled by countries outside of the US. It comes down to our own food source security.” “We used to make fair amount of return on my cattle, but the industry has changed dramatically with the government allowing the consolidation of the meat processing business. 4 companies, giant companies got together and decided to roll that up, consolidate it, and that's just business. But when we get on the other side of it and we take into account the ramifications on our national economic health. It has a very detrimental effect. Our government allowed 2 giant companies controlled by foreign governments to come in and acquire. One of them is controlled by the Chinese, and they bought Smithville out of North Carolina. And the other one was a Brazilian company that came in and bought up one of the other major players. So now we have an industry, 85% of it actually has been consolidated and rolled up and controlled by 4 companies. Four companies now are dictating who gets what, where, and when. Do you see? But nobody thought our government would let 50% or more of the beef processing be controlled by countries outside of the US. It comes down to our own food source security. The geopolitical situation we find ourselves in, why would we want to have an antagonist on 25% of our meat processing? It makes no sense at all.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that the consolidation of the meat processing business, enabled by the government, has negatively impacted the national economic health. They claim that two foreign government-controlled companies acquired major players in the industry. One is controlled by the Chinese, who bought Smithfield, and the other is a Brazilian company. According to the speaker, 85% of the industry is now controlled by four companies, dictating market conditions. They express concern that the government allowed over 50% of beef processing to be controlled by foreign entities, which they believe compromises food source security, especially given the current geopolitical climate. They question why a potential adversary would control 25% of US meat processing.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We used to make fair amount of return on our cattle, but the industry has changed dramatically with the government allowing the consolidation of the meat processing business. Four companies, giant companies got together and decided to roll that up, consolidate it, and that's just business. But when we get on the other side of it and we take into account the ramifications on our national, economic health. It has a very detrimental effect. Our government allowed two giant companies controlled by foreign governments to come in and acquire. One of them is controlled by the Chinese and they bought Smithfield out of North Carolina and the other one was a Brazilian company that came in and bought up one of the other major players. So now we have an industry, 85% of it actually has been consolidated and rolled up and controlled by four companies. Four companies now are dictating who gets what, where, and when. They say, but nobody thought our government would let 50% or more of the beef processing be controlled by countries outside of The US. It comes down to our own food source security. The geopolitical situation we find ourselves in, why would we want to have an antagonist on 25% of our meat processing? It makes no sense at all.

@wendyp4545 — Wendy Patterson

Posted - April 13, 2025 at 11:12 PM

Saved - April 13, 2025 at 11:37 PM

@wendyp4545 - Wendy Patterson

Congress is leading by example of consolidating power in everything against the American citizens. We allow foreigners into our Congress who are loyal to their home countries and then we sit here wondering why we're losing our country to foreign enemies. The kicker, they keep getting reelected.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American cattle rancher exposing that they’ve all been sold out, they’re at risk of being run out of business and your meat is being imported - 4 large mega corporations now own 85% of the entire industry - 2 of them are foreign owned - 1 of them is Chinese “50% or more of the beef processing be controlled by countries outside of the US. It comes down to our own food source security.” “We used to make fair amount of return on my cattle, but the industry has changed dramatically with the government allowing the consolidation of the meat processing business. 4 companies, giant companies got together and decided to roll that up, consolidate it, and that's just business. But when we get on the other side of it and we take into account the ramifications on our national economic health. It has a very detrimental effect. Our government allowed 2 giant companies controlled by foreign governments to come in and acquire. One of them is controlled by the Chinese, and they bought Smithville out of North Carolina. And the other one was a Brazilian company that came in and bought up one of the other major players. So now we have an industry, 85% of it actually has been consolidated and rolled up and controlled by 4 companies. Four companies now are dictating who gets what, where, and when. Do you see? But nobody thought our government would let 50% or more of the beef processing be controlled by countries outside of the US. It comes down to our own food source security. The geopolitical situation we find ourselves in, why would we want to have an antagonist on 25% of our meat processing? It makes no sense at all.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker says the cattle industry has changed dramatically due to government allowance of meat processing consolidation. Four giant companies consolidated, which has a detrimental effect on national economic health. The government allowed two giant companies controlled by foreign governments to acquire US companies. One is controlled by the Chinese, who bought Smithfield, and the other is a Brazilian company. Four companies now control 85% of the industry and dictate who gets what, where, and when. The speaker claims the government has allowed over 50% of beef processing to be controlled by countries outside of the US. The speaker questions why the US would want an antagonist controlling 25% of its meat processing, citing food source security and the geopolitical situation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We used to make fair amount of return on our cattle, but the industry has changed dramatically with the government allowing the consolidation of the meat processing business. Four companies, giant companies got together and decided to roll that up, consolidate it, and that's just business. But when we get on the other side of it and we take into account the ramifications on our national, economic health. It has a very detrimental effect. Our government allowed two giant companies controlled by foreign governments to come in and acquire. One of them is controlled by the Chinese and they bought Smithfield out of North Carolina and the other one was a Brazilian company that came in and bought up one of the other major players. So now we have an industry, 85% of it actually has been consolidated and rolled up and controlled by four companies. Four companies now are dictating who gets what, where, and when. They say, but nobody thought our government would let 50% or more of the beef processing be controlled by countries outside of The US. It comes down to our own food source security. The geopolitical situation we find ourselves in, why would we want to have an antagonist on 25% of our meat processing? It makes no sense at all.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - April 20, 2025 at 1:52 PM

Saved - April 20, 2025 at 2:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I want to highlight a serious issue regarding JBS, the world's largest meat processing company. They've been charged with bribing over 1,800 politicians and officials. Additionally, they've exploited a loophole that allows them to import cheap foreign meats while labeling them as "Product of the USA." Although this loophole is set to close, enforcement won't begin until 2026. Until then, they can bring in lower-quality beef, process it here, and mislabel it, raising concerns about the safety and quality of the meat we consume.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Everyone should be aware of this The owners of JBS, the worlds largest meat processing company, has been charged with bribing over 1,800 politicians and officials They’ve been importing cheap foreign meats and using the“Product of the USA” labeling loophole This is a racket. Remember, even though this loophole made by the USDA has finally been closed it won’t be fully enforced until 2026 Until then, “They can import essentially a lower standard beef into America. All they have to do is break it down here so it arrives into America as a frozen slab of beef, essentially. They can turn it into steaks and hamburger from there. And then they can sell it as product of the usa. And they're allowed to label that as product of the usa, which it is not. And it's shot up with who knows what (vaccines)”

Video Transcript AI Summary

JBS has allegedly bribed over 3,000 government officials to import lower-standard beef into America. The beef arrives as frozen slabs, is processed into steaks and hamburger, and then sold as a product of the USA, which it allegedly is not. This imported beef may contain unknown additives. This practice undercuts American ranchers, and instead of feeding Americans, JBS exports American products.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So one of these companies, JBS, what they're doing is they have, through lobbyists, they have convinced and they've even been the owners of it have even been charged with bribes, bribing over 3,000 government officials so that they can import essentially lower standard beef into America. All they have to do is break it down here. So it it arrives into America as a frozen slab of beef essentially. They can turn it into steaks and hamburger from there, and then they can sell it as product of The USA. And they're allowed to label that as product of The USA which it is not and it's shot up with who knows what. Meanwhile, they undercut our American ranchers and they export our products instead of feeding our products to the American people. That's outrageous.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - May 14, 2025 at 2:56 AM

Saved - June 12, 2025 at 8:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

It's crucial to raise awareness about the upcoming decision on May 23rd regarding JBS, the world's largest meatpacker, and its potential listing on the New York Stock Exchange. This foreign-owned company has serious allegations against it, including human trafficking and corruption. Reports indicate that they mistreat workers, cramming them into overcrowded apartments and charging exorbitant fees for living and transportation. The Batista brothers, who own JBS, have a history of criminal activity. We need to act to prevent this company from gaining further control over our food supply.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is extremely important As early as May 23rd it will be decided if JBS, the largest meat packer in the world, will be allowed to trade on the New York Stock Exchange This is a foreign owned company that has captured and controls our meat supply It gets worse: “If there is one company that should never be allowed on the New York Stock Exchange, it's JBS, and here's why. In case you don't know, JBS is the largest meatpacking company in the world. And as recent as last September in my home state of Colorado, they have been brought up on some pretty serious allegations by the union leader for human trafficking. They've also been found guilty of corruption charges as well, and they've served time. The Batista brothers who own JBS, they are Brazilian. This is a completely foreign owned company. Here's some of the recent allegations that they're facing of cramming between 40 and 50 people in a apartment to live, charging them between $60 and $120 bucks a week per head to live there, then charging them $40 or $50 bucks to go to and from work and it's a 5 mile trip. These guys are convicted criminals charged with bribery in America and Brazil. — They're having a meeting May 23rd or as early as May 23rd to decide whether or not JBS gets to be on the New York Stock Exchange. Please share this video. We got to get the word out and keep this corrupt company from owning more of your food supply than they already do. — Let's stop JBS from getting on the New York Stock Exchange.”

@ValerieAnne1970 — Valerie Anne Smith

Posted - June 26, 2025 at 5:53 AM

Saved - June 26, 2025 at 6:47 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Over 85% of grass-fed beef labeled as "Product of USA" is actually imported, misleading consumers who believe it comes from American ranches. The USDA allows this labeling due to a loophole that permits foreign beef to be labeled as U.S. product if it undergoes minimal processing in the U.S. This change began in 2015 when mandatory country-of-origin labeling was rolled back. To ensure support for local farmers, it's crucial to buy meat directly from them. I'm happy to provide referrals for local beef and other meats available for delivery.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Over 85% Of Grass Fed Beef In America Is Imported Product...These Cows Were Not Born Here, Did Not Graze Here & Were Never Processed Here. Jenni & Will Harris Yet, The USDA & FDA Give Their Stamp Of Safety Approval & Allow This Foreign Beef To Be Labeled As 'Product Of The USA.' Beware of misleading “Product of USA” labels on supermarket beef. Consumers buying a package of steaks at the supermarket marked “Product of USA” likely believe that the label means it was raised on an American ranch. Maybe it’s also marked “Grass Fed,” & they imagine a grassy hillside somewhere in the U.S. dotted with healthy cattle. They assume they know where their family’s food comes from. The problem? Over 85% of beef & pork in the package labeled with a big USA sticker on it came from one of 20+ foreign countries. Thanks to lobbying efforts by powerful meatpackers, such as JBS, Tyson & Cargill, current law allows use of the “Product of USA” label even when the beef & pork was born, raised & processed in a foreign country as long as...once the meat enters the U.S. it undergoes repackaging or what the USDA refers to as 'value added.' 'Value Added' is a loophole term that if the foreign beef & pork has been repackaged, sliced, cut or ground up on USA soil, then it is legally labeled as 'product of the USA.' The trouble began in 2015, when President Barack Obama & the USDA rolled back Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for beef & pork products, allowing meat to be sold without disclosing its home country on the label. In December 2015, President Barack Obama signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act which removed mandatory country-of-origin labeling requirements for muscle cuts of beef & pork as well as ground beef & pork. Under the current rules, beef & pork products that are shipped to the United States can be labeled “product of U.S.A.,” even when the animal was raised a continent away. That means a steer born, raised & slaughtered in Uruguay can be repackaged at a meatpacking plant in Colorado & labeled 'product of USA.' These labeling loopholes prevent consumers from knowing where the beef they feed their families is coming from & whether or not their dollars are supporting American ranchers. Crucial now more than ever, is to purchase beef, pork & all meat, locally from farmers & ranchers. Support your local farmer & rancher. Let me know in the comments if you need referrals on how to find local beef or for beef, pork & poultry that can be shipped to your door. 👇Foreign Beef Can Be Labeled As USA Beef👇 https://prosperousamerica.org/foreign-beef-can-legally-be-labeled-product-of-u-s-a-its-killing-americas-grass-fed-industry/ 👇USDA Food Labeling Policy Book👇 https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/import/Labeling-Policy-Book.pdf 👇You Can't Judge Your Beef By The Sticker👇 https://hageman.house.gov/media/in-the-news/you-cant-judge-your-beef-sticker#:~:text=Thanks%20to%20lobbying%20efforts%20by,undergoes%20minimal%20processing%20or%20repackaging Speakers: Will & Jenni Harris of White Oak Pastures Podcast: @joerogan Video: @Investearnsave_

Video Transcript AI Summary

Over 85% of grass-fed beef in the American market is imported, not raised in America. This is a shift from the US being an early innovator to now representing only 15% of the market. Imported beef can be legally labeled as a product of the USA if value is added in this country through grinding, slicing, cutting, packaging, labeling, or reboxing. The animal can be born, raised, and slaughtered in countries like Uruguay, Australia, or New Zealand. The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, and Latin America, runs it through USDA inspection, and if it passes, labels it as a product of the USA.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in the American market is imported product, not raised in America. Ain't that nuts? In twenty years, we've gone from being a very early innovator to just a mere meager portion of 15%. Speaker 1: That's true, but it's not the worst part. The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of The USA. Speaker 2: How's that? Speaker 1: If value is added in this country, it's a product of The USA. What? And we we compete with we compete with it every day. Speaker 2: How do they add value? Speaker 0: Go ahead. No. You go. This is good. Speaker 1: If they grind it, slice it, cut it, package it, label it Speaker 0: Rebox it. Speaker 1: Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or 20 other countries. Speaker 2: The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, much of Latin America. It then runs that beef through USDA inspection, and if it passes, sticks a label on it that reads product of The USA. How dare you?

Foreign beef can legally be labeled “Product of U.S.A.” It’s killing America’s grass-fed industry. | Coalition For A Prosperous America Editor’s note: This article shows how the elimination of country of origin labeling for meat caused American producers’ share of the grass fed cattle market prosperousamerica.org

You can’t judge your beef by the sticker You need to beware of misleading “Product of USA” labels on supermarket beef because looks can be deceiving. hageman.house.gov

@newstart_2024 — Camus

Posted - August 9, 2025 at 5:49 PM

Saved - August 9, 2025 at 7:32 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I learned that 70% of supermarket ground beef contains "pink slime," a cheap filler made from beef trimmings, previously meant for dog food. It's treated with ammonia to kill bacteria, which raises serious concerns. Whistleblowers warned about it, but their voices went unheard. Would you eat this?

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Shocking truth about your ground beef 70% of supermarket ground beef contains "pink slime"—a cheap filler made from beef trimmings once used only for dog food and cooking oil. Sprayed with ammonia to kill bacteria, this "lean, finely textured beef" is not fresh ground beef—it’s an economic fraud. USDA whistleblowers Gerald Zirnstein and Carl Custer warned against it, but their concerns were ignored. Would you knowingly eat ammonia-treated scraps?

Video Transcript AI Summary

USDA scientist, now whistleblower, says 70% of the ground beef we buy at the supermarket contains something he calls pink slime: beef trimmings that were once used only in dog food and cooking oil now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe to eat and then added to most ground beef as a cheaper filler. Zernstein, who in a USDA memo first coined the term pink slime, is coming forward to say he won't buy it. It's economic fraud. It's not it's not, fresh ground beef. Zernstein and his fellow USDA scientist Carl Custer both warned against using what the industry calls lean, finely textured beef and is widely known now as pink slime. But their government bosses overruled them. Why didn't you consider it beef? Because it was a salvage product. Leftovers fat that had been heated at low temperature and the excess fat spun out.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: USDA scientist, now whistleblower, knows that 70% of the ground beef we buy at the supermarket contains something he calls pink slime. Beef trimmings that were once used only in dog food and cooking oil now sprayed with ammonia to make them safe to eat and then added to most ground beef as a cheaper filler. It was Zernstein who in a USDA memo first coined the term pink slime and is now coming forward to say he won't buy it. It's economic fraud. It's not it's not, fresh ground beef. It's a substitute. It's a cheap substitute being added in. Zernstein and his fellow USDA scientist Carl Custer both warned against using what the industry calls lean, finely textured beef and is widely known now as pink slime. But their government bosses overruled them. Why didn't you consider it beef? Because it was a salvage product. Leftovers fat that had been heated at low temperature and the excess fat spun out. Here's how it's done. Those waste trimmings are gathered simmered at low heat to make it easier to separate fat from muscle put in a centrifuge and spun to finish the separation. Next the mixture is sent through pipes where it's sprayed with ammonia gas to kill bacteria and finally compressed into bricks and flash frozen for shipment to meat packers and grocery stores where it's added to most ground beef.

@ValerieAnne1970 — Valerie Anne Smith

Posted - October 12, 2025 at 5:54 AM

Saved - October 12, 2025 at 6:42 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read that the USDA allows "Product of USA" labels on grass-fed beef that never lived on American soil. Nearly 90% of U.S. grass-fed beef is imported. Once repackaged in the U.S., it can be labeled as U.S. product, due to COOL rollback in 2015. A steer born in Uruguay can be sold as American after processing in Colorado. Will Harris calls it deceptive; the practice hinges on a "value added" loophole. The piece urges buying local.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

USDA Allows 'Product of USA' Labels On Grass Fed Beef That Never Lived On American Soil. Almost 90% Of American Market Grass Fed Beef Is Imported From 20+ Foreign Countries. Once The Foreign Meat Enters The US, Repackaging It Makes It 'Legal' To Qualify As A 'Product Of USA.' The elimination of country of origin labeling for meat caused American producers’ share of the grass fed cattle market to decline from 60% to less than 15% in just a few years. In 2015, the Obama administration’s USDA rolled back Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) for beef & pork products, allowing meat to be sold without disclosing what country it came from, on the label. Under current rules, beef & pork products that are shipped to the United States can be labeled “product of U.S.A.,” even when the animal was raised on another continent. A steer that is born, raised & processed in Uruguay can be cut into steaks or ground up & repackaged at a meatpacking plant in Colorado & is labeled as American meat—even when it isn’t. "The very idea of labeling beef in a grocery store ‘product of U.S.A.,’ when the animal never drew a breath of air on this continent, is just horrible,” says Will Harris, owner of White Oak Pastures, which produces its branded line of grass-fed beef in Bluffton, Georgia." "I don’t begrudge importers or producers from other countries selling to knowing consumers that want to buy that imported product. But I’m appalled at what the deception has done to the economies of our ranchers." Imported grass fed beef brands are taking advantage of a legal ambiguity—& some are downright deceptive. 3 powerful meatpackers...JBS, Tyson & Cargill, are deceptively using the law that allows use of the “Product of USA” label even when the beef & pork was born, raised & processed in a foreign country. Once the meat enters the U.S. it undergoes repackaging or what the USDA refers to as 'value added.' 'Value Added' is a loophole term that if the foreign beef & pork has been sliced, cut, ground or repackaged on American soil, then it is legally labeled as 'product of the USA.' Now, more than ever, it is crucial for our health & in support of American farmers & ranchers...to buy local, to purchase from small reputable butcher shops & to order from online grass fed beef shipping ranchers. 👇USDA Food Labeling Policy Book👇 https://www.fsis.usda.gov/sites/default/files/import/Labeling-Policy-Book.pdf 👇Foreign Meat Contamination Found In US👇 https://www.reuters.com/world/exclusive-us-sees-spike-contaminated-australian-meat-shipments-documents-2021-10-27/#:~:text=Reuters%20Plus-,EXCLUSIVE%20U.S.%20sees%20spike%20in%20contaminated%20Australian%20meat%20shipments%20%2D%20documents,to%20documents%20reviewed%20by%20Reuters. 👇Imported Beef Found To Be Contaminated👇 https://www.northernag.net/u-s-cattlemens-concerned-about-contaminated-mexican-beef/ Speakers: Will & Jenni Harris of White Oak Pastures Video: @Investearnsave_ Podcast: @joerogan

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in the American market is imported product, not raised in America. In twenty years, we've gone from being a very early innovator to just a mere meager portion of 15%. Speaker 1: The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of The USA. Speaker 2: How's that? Speaker 1: If value is added in this country, it's a product of The USA. Speaker 1: If they grind it, slice it, cut it, package it, label it Speaker 0: Rebox it. Speaker 1: Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or 20 other countries. Speaker 2: The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, much of Latin America. It then runs that beef through USDA inspection, and if it passes, sticks a label on it that reads product of The USA. How dare you?

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Over 85% of the grass fed beef in the American market is imported product, not raised in America. Ain't that nuts? In twenty years, we've gone from being a very early innovator to just a mere meager portion of 15%. Speaker 1: That's true, but it's not the worst part. The worst part is that imported beef is legally labeled product of The USA. Speaker 2: How's that? Speaker 1: If value is added in this country, it's a product of The USA. What? And we we compete with we compete with it every day. Speaker 2: How do they add value? Speaker 0: Go ahead. No. You go. This is good. Speaker 1: If they grind it, slice it, cut it, package it, label it Speaker 0: Rebox it. Speaker 1: Transport it. But the animal make make no mistake. The animal was born, raised, and slaughtered in Uruguay, Australia, New Zealand, or 20 other countries. Speaker 2: The United States imports beef from places like Australia, Canada, much of Latin America. It then runs that beef through USDA inspection, and if it passes, sticks a label on it that reads product of The USA. How dare you?

EXCLUSIVE U.S. sees spike in contaminated Australian meat shipments - documents U.S. food safety officials have blocked a rising number of meat shipments from Australia since 2019 due to fecal contamination, straining trade relations between the two countries, according to documents reviewed by Reuters. reuters.com

U.S. Cattlemen’s Concerned About Contaminated Mexican Beef On Tuesday, the United States Cattlemen's Association (USCA) sent a letter to leaders at the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and Food and Safety Inspection Service (FSIS) over concerns associated with contaminated Mexican cattle, lamb, poultry, and swine. According to Food Safety News, a total of 54 people... northernag.net

@brandilwells — King Arthur Fan

Posted - November 24, 2025 at 7:42 PM

Saved - December 11, 2025 at 9:39 PM

@brandilwells - King Arthur Fan

Our food is not food anymore. I don’t know how we’re still alive. Here’s how you can find out where your meat comes from. 👀 https://t.co/hnkeBeNPdg

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 summarizes the issue with prepackaged ground meat at multiple major retailers, including Kroger, Target, Walmart, Aldi, Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, Whole Foods, and Fresh Thyme. He states that none of these packages tell you where the meat comes from, where it’s packaged, or what procedures were used to ensure safety. Behind the counter, employees say there’s information on the back to scan with your phone that leads to an FDA website. He claims the FDA website “could either be three d printed” and “could be a how do I put a cloned animal,” and that if that’s a problem, “well, TikTok, you need to check the the FDA website because it says it could be.” He urges caution, concluding with, “Let’s just say this, our food ain't food anymore.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So I've been to Kroger. I've been to Target. I've been to Walmart. I've been to Aldi, Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, Whole Foods, and Fresh Thyme. Every single one of them has a prepackaged ground meat that will not tell you, number one, where it comes from, number two, where it's packaged, and what kind of procedures that it goes through in order for us to know that it's safe. If you ask them behind the counter, they're gonna tell you there's a thing on the back, scan it with your phone, and it's gonna take you to a website that the FDA has put out there. And what it's gonna say is, it could either be three d printed, It could be a how do I put a cloned animal. Let's just put it out there. If that's a problem, well, TikTok, you need to check the the FDA website because it says it could be. Folks, god, I gotta be careful. Let's just say this, our food ain't food anymore.