reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@intheMatrixxx - intheMatrixxx
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the government plans to gain complete control of the Internet by using black people under the pretext of preventing digital discrimination. They argue that this aligns with the sixth plank of the Communist Manifesto, which advocates for centralization of communication within the hands of the state. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to subscribe for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I told you that the government was about to take complete control of the Internet? What if I told you that they were gonna use black people to do it? Under the guise of preventing digital discrimination, that's exactly what the government intends to do. The 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto, number 6 It says centralization of communication within the hands of the states, not only using black people to take control of the Internet. They're using black people to it?
There's communism. You've been informed. Subscribe for more.
@AntonioTweets2 - 🍁Antonio Tweets
Wow. 👇 https://t.co/gQh9QDODWi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Researchers are focusing on finding agents that can effectively kill cancer stem cells, which are resistant to standard treatments. Many cancer drugs shrink tumors but fail to eliminate the stem cells, which can make them more aggressive. A drug called Exovar is being clinically tested to target cancer stem cells, while curcumin, found in turmeric, has also shown promise. However, the cost of Exovar is significantly higher compared to curcumin, which is a more affordable and natural alternative. Other food items like resveratrol, genistein, sulforaphane, and EGCG have also been found to kill cancer stem cells. Despite this knowledge, conventional oncologists often overlook these options due to societal pressure and lack of awareness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Agents and items that kill cancer stem cells. This is very important.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Very, very important. Cancer stem cells, you know, colon cancer, the at the base of the crypt is a normal stem cell, normally speaking. And if those cancer if those normal stem cells become malignant for whatever reason, then you have then you're almost certainly dealing with a cancer stem cell. Cancer stem cell is highly resistant to treatment, to key to standard treatment. So there are big drug companies involved in trials, clinical trials of agents to try to get FDA approval to kill for to the agent to kill cancer stem cells.
So I was looking at a list, a paper that contain a list of these agents. At the top
Speaker 1: Right before the list. Before you say the list, I I wanna just establish something for folks that don't understand why this matters. It's because many, many cancer drugs and treatments will shrink a tumor, but they don't kill the cancer stem cells, Which are only, you know, less than 10% of a tumor, sometimes they're only 1% of a tumor. And and so it looks like, woah, this treatment totally shrunk my tumor by 90%. Like, wow, it's working.
Let's go to Chili's and celebrate, you know, happy hour. And The reality is is like, no. You those stem cells are now more aggressive. They're pissed off and they're and they're resistant, and they're gonna come raging Back because the treatment not only didn't kill them, but made them more aggressive. Right?
So the the the whole point is, like, you gotta kill the stem cells.
Speaker 0: Right. And drug companies have been racking their collective brains trying to come up with drugs to kill cancer stem cells. So Here's the funny thing. I was looking at this list yesterday of drugs, candidate drugs, substances to kill cancer stem cells. At top of the list was a drug called Exovar.
That interested me because I didn't I I didn't know but most of these other drugs are just in development. Nexovar is actually an approved drug for certain kinds of cancer now being clinical trial to kill specifically to kill cancer stem cells. Right? The bottom of the list was Curcumin, the yellow coloring natural coloring agent in turmeric, right? So the cost of of a good quality, curcumin, in a in what probably would be an effective amount would be about 60¢ a day.
Right? Literally. Right? To get Yeah. You know, in that realm.
Or if you took it for a year, $250. Look this up. And I look you can look this up at drugs.com or any other website. The cost of Nexovar, currently for the for its indications is over $20,000 a month. If you took that simple math if you took that for a year, you're looking at 250 $1,000 as opposed to $250.
That's sort of the gulf between the generic natural non toxic, you know, stuff that you could buy at a health food store or a food co op versus something that you only can get through the machinery of big pharma pumping this out. And then, of course, you know, with all the all the buzz around, now we found something to kill cancer stem cells, blah blah blah. But they've known for 10 years that curcumin and other natural agents kill cancer stem cells. They're actually the only thing pretty much they do. If you There are probably about 20 different items that kill cancer stem cells that are known in the laboratory and somewhat also in the clinic.
And of those, 10 of them are foods, food items, food derivatives.
Speaker 1: So why
Speaker 0: don't we
Speaker 1: What else?
Speaker 0: So resveratrol from red grape skins. Yep. Genistein from soybeans. Sulforaphane from broccoli and broccoli sprouts. I mentioned turmeric from cur from curcumin from turmeric, and EGCG from green tea.
Speaker 1: From black seed?
Speaker 0: Yeah. But the big five are the in terms of the certainly the quantity of research. There's about 10,000 journal articles that cover those those big five.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And then there are other minor ones like, maybe they're not so minor, but they're not as well researched. Like for instance, cinnamon, cardamom, pepper, some and by the way, how interesting isn't it that those things are sort of like traditional things in golden milk, in the the Ayurvedic formula and also you could put those in smoothies. You know there's a lot you can do with those, whether you take them as foods, you take them as supplement. But there's, aside from the holistically oriented doctors who are not that not that common in the cancer field or naturopathic oncologists. Who among, you know, whole of your your viewers was ever told this by a conventional oncologist.
They're they are either legally unaware.
Speaker 1: 0. The number is 0.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. And then there were a few, you know, heroes who are oncologists or doctors mainly treating cancer who are aware of this. But you know, what happens is if you push too hard, if you're an oncologist and you push too hard on this, you get a reputation as a weirdo. You get a reputation not as a sound person who was gonna move up the ranks of American Society For Clinical Oncology and of your department, but as, like, people are looking at you askance, like what's wrong with with that guy or that woman that they're suddenly so interested in garlic or ginger or green tea. And we have testimony from 2 top doctors in England who said that what they're they're big enthusiasts for ginger.
Ginger is another one that's that kills cancer stem cell. But they they are aware of the fact that, you know, there's it's embarrassing. It's a deep embarrassment to to them and to their colleagues if they admit this this sort of fascination with something that's not mainstream.
@IsabellaMDeLuca - Isabella Maria DeLuca
What is even happening anymore? https://t.co/BiOW8MNlc7
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about a recent episode of the children's show Cocomelon on Netflix. They believe that the episode, featuring a boy in a dress dancing for his two dads, is intentionally brainwashing children and undermining traditional family values. The speaker worries about the future and the need for parents to be cautious about what their children are exposed to. They mention a children's platform called Bent Key by Daily Wire, which they believe promotes traditional values and offers a 14-day free trial. The speaker encourages parents to try it out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I feel like we live in a world where everything is so overwhelmingly woke that you just literally cannot catch a break from anything. Recently, one of the most popular children's shows, Cocomelon, that is for ages 2 and older, aired this episode on Netflix. How about you break out those moves for your 2 biggest fans? So they put a little boy in a dress and then had him dancing for his 2 dads. The scariest part in my opinion is trying to understand why they are intentionally brainwashing an entire generation away from the standard family makeup.
We all know how families are created and it's not with 2 dads. And so this episode is not to promote family and it is not to widen the possibilities of family. It is quite literally to make families obsolete, which is anti women, they are literally destroying an entire generation using children's shows. I don't have children yet, put I do worry, about how much crazier the world is gonna be by the time I do have children, and it does concern me. I feel like parents today have to be so careful about what they let their children around, what's on the radio, what's on TV, what's in their schools, what's in their books, what's in the stores.
It's so exhausting as I can imagine. That's why I am forever grateful for companies like Daily Wire. They have launched something called Bent Key, which is a children's only platform that features a variety of different children's shows, and you do not have to worry about your child being indoctrinated with woke LGBTQ plus propaganda. The best part about these daily lives shows is that that they promote traditional values. So not only will your children love it, but you as a parent can trust it, and it is one less thing for you to worry about.
If you go to benke.com, they are offering a free 14 day trial. There's quite literally no reason at all for you not to try this, and I will put the link up in my story.
@theemikehobart - mike hobart
This crap wasn’t happening in 2019… memba? https://t.co/1MZZ7Td3O7
Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript is a collection of various television shows and segments that are sponsored by Pfizer. The shows mentioned include CBS This Morning, ABC News Nightline, Anderson Cooper 360, CNN Tonight, Aaron Burnett Outfront, This Week with George Stephanopoulos, Today's Countdown to the Royal Wedding, CBS Sports Update, Meet the Press, and a segment on finding hidden sugars in the American Family Diet. All of these shows and segments are sponsored by Pfizer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by Pfizer. Good morning. America is brought to you by Pfizer. CBS Healthwatch sponsored by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper 360, brought to you by Pfizer.
ABC News Nightline, brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference, brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight brought to you by Pfizer. Early start brought to you by Pfizer. Friday night on Aaron Burnett, Outfront, brought to you by Pfizer.
This week with George Stephanopoulos is brought to you by Pfizer. Nope. Today's countdown to the royal wedding is brought to you by Pfizer. And now a CBS Sports Update brought to you by Pfizer. Meet the press.
Data download brought to you by Pfizer. This portion of CBS This Morning sponsored by Pfizer. On how to find the hidden sugars in the American Family Diet, sponsored by Pfizer.
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The president's chief of staff, Ron Klain, and other members of the administration have ties to dark money groups, which are fundraising organizations that don't disclose their donors. One of these groups is led by former top aide Hillary Clinton. Dark money has watchdog groups concerned about its impact on politics. Klain previously served on the board for the Center For American Progress, an organization linked to dark money. During the 2020 campaign, President Biden vowed to fight the influence of dark money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So called dark money in politics, well, that is where fundraising groups don't publicly disclose their donors. But it turns out the president's chief of staff, Ron Klain, is one of several administration members with ties to dark money groups, and one of them is we led by, guess, former top aide, Hillary Clinton. Mark Meredith has the story live from Washington. Hi, Mark.
Speaker 1: Hey, Julie. Good morning to you. In politics, money can make all the difference in deciding who gets elected and which issues matter, but so called dark money has watchdog groups increasingly concerned. Fox news.com examined its impact inside the Biden administration. And when we talk about dark money here, we're referring to donations made by groups which do not disclose who their donors are.
Our web team finding several staffers have ties to organizations who rely on dark money, including, as you mentioned, the chief of staff, who at one time Served on the board for the Center For American Progress. Now during the 2020 campaign, then candidate Biden, he vowed to fight its influence
@Naturegirl571 - NatureGirl
Crazy huh? https://t.co/VBjtPn7qPe
Video Transcript AI Summary
15 years ago, the World Health Organization was seen as a way to centralize power and push compulsory vaccinations globally. The organization can mandate actions during a pandemic emergency, aiming for mass vaccination to achieve herd immunity. Those who refuse vaccinations may face backlash from society. The idea of a new world order involves uniting nations under a common cause beyond military strength.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine 15 years ago this man said this and teemed crazy. World Health Organization is one of a a a gathering number of organizations with the word world in them. World Health Organization, World Bank, World Trade Organization, on and on you go. Anything like that is a organization created to take power from governments and put it around one table
Speaker 1: and effectively whoever controls the people around the one table. So they are
Speaker 0: using the World Health Organization to dictate to governments on how they should respond to this, to dictate how bad it
Speaker 1: is when it when it isn't,
Speaker 0: and, to recommend compulsory vaccinations of everyone on the planet. And they've very craftily, passed legislation, I think it was in 2,005, that gives the World Health Organization powers when it is called a pandemic emergency, not just to recommend to its member countries what they do, but to tell them to have the recommendations made man mandatory. And so you put all this together, the mass vaccination and the propaganda and the panic and all the rest of it, And it's it's clear to anybody with a mind on active duty that this has been created for one reason, to get access to every single human body on the planet, and and they don't want that for reasons that are beneficial to us. And what you're gonna see is government, agencies and spokesman talking about the fact that we must have a certain level of the population vaccinated to have herd immunity. And so anyone that is refusing is putting the rest of the community at risk because they're stopping the herd immunity.
Actually, they're stopping the herd mentality, but that's that's what they'll be saying. What that will be designed to do is to turn those who have had it without question against, those that are refusing. And then when they come out with a compulsory business, then you're going to have a great body of people, the sheep, supporting that, thinking it's going to affect them if they don't. And this is why it is so important for more and more people to understand what's going on and to refuse. It's because those who refuse are going to be targeted by those who sheet like just put their arm out and have it.
Speaker 1: We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've gotta have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.
Speaker 0: It is a big idea, a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause.
@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy
Imagine where we would be. https://t.co/WJT2NmYwZi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stan's inventions harnessed energy from the vacuum of space, known as zero point energy. This energy is abundant and can power devices like Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower and Howard Johnson's magnetron motor. Despite proving their devices worked, inventors like Johnson faced skepticism and were denied patents. Johnson's motor operated efficiently for years until his equipment was stolen, leading him to stop his work. The scientific community struggles to reconcile these inventions with traditional beliefs, highlighting the potential of tapping into limitless energy sources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, turns out that Stan's water car was his least important invention. That doughnut shaped device was another invention that created energy. And the reason it was classified? Well, it didn't run on gas. It didn't run on water.
It ran on nothing. The vacuum of space is supposed to be empty. And at the temperature of absolute 0, it should be perfectly still. But quantum physicists discovered that empty space is not empty or still at all.
Speaker 1: Is that, so called empty space isn't really empty at all. It's actually full of energy. So instead of being like kind of a quiet empty lake, it's more like the frost at the base of a waterfall or something.
Speaker 0: Now we've all been taught that in an atom, electrons orbit the nucleus like planets orbit the sun. In a vacuum with no resistance, the orbits of electrons should be predictable, but they're not. In 1955, Willis Lamb won the Nobel Prize for discovering what's become known as the Lamb shift. Now in simple terms, Lamb discovered that electrons and hydrogen atoms were being disturbed by something. He discovered complex interactions between the electron and the vacuum of space itself.
Space is teeming with quantum particles that blink in and out of existence. And when they do that, they use and create energy, a lot of it.
Speaker 1: When you go look at the numbers, you find out that there's enough energy in the volume of a coffee cup to evaporate all the world's oceans that you could get it all off.
Speaker 0: Enough energy to boil and evaporate all the oceans on earth from a coffee cup of empty space. This energy is called 0 point energy, and it's generated from the 0 point field. Nikola Tesla, Nikolai Kosyarev, and other scientists called this field the ether. The ether is a field in which everything exists, but it in a dimension that our brains can't perceive. Particles blinking in and out of existence have to be coming from and going somewhere.
That place is the ether, the base layer of reality. But even though we can't see it, this layer can be disrupted with electromagnetism. Now Tesla's Wardenclyffe tower tapped into this endless supply of energy. The tower was considered an overunity device. An overunity is when something gives out more energy than is put in.
Now mainstream science claims this is impossible. Again, because it breaks the second law of thermodynamics. But for over a 100 years, scientists and inventors have proved that claim wrong. Zero point energy devices also violate the conservation of energy, That energy can't be created or destroyed. But those inventors don't claim to be creating energy from nothing.
They are tapping in the energy that already exists everywhere all around us. In the 19 seventies, Howard Johnson created the magnetron motor. It used hydrogen, magnets, light rays, and fusion to create electricity. Now according to practical physics, his invention was impossible. But here's the thing, his motor worked, and he proved it over and over again.
Still, he was denied a patent.
Speaker 2: The dilemma facing Johnson is not really his dilemma, but rather that of other scientists who have observed his prototypes. The devices obviously do work, but the textbooks say they shouldn't. Johnson is saying to the scientific community that this is a phenomenon that seems to contradict some of our traditional beliefs. For all our sakes, let's not dismiss it outright, but take the time to understand the complex forces at work here.
Speaker 0: Johnson didn't get his patent and was shunned by the scientific community. Now Howard Johnson wasn't a weekend garage tinkerer. He was a government contractor. He worked on atomic energy projects. He made equipment for the military.
He already had over 30 patents for chemistry and physics devices.
Speaker 1: Science and physicists are especially determined to protect the law of conservation of know what the game is, but they are so scared.
Speaker 0: Johnson's motor would lose less than 2% efficiency in almost 20 years of continuous operation, but he stopped working when someone broke into a shop and stole his equipment. He got the message.
@SkyBrockmoller - Sky Brockmoller
4 days ago… https://t.co/GzZB1xExTl
@SkyBrockmoller - Sky Brockmoller
@itsalwaysrains I think I cracked the fucking code. Giving me chills. https://t.co/izjlRwSerp
@DGrayTexas45 - Clyp Keeper
@stillgray Pretty crazy to see how they went from this to that. https://t.co/taimEKOhPN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the government but acknowledges the importance of supporting the president. Jack Black joins the fight for democracy by declaring that the government sucks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government totally sucks you motherfucker. The government totally sucks. But my president needs me. The government totally sucks. And when the president wins in November Government totally sucks.
When democracy is at stake, Jack Black answers the call. Government totally sucks. The government totally sucks, you motherfucker.
@Joanne60183156 - Joanne
Video Transcript AI Summary
Baron Trump doesn't resemble his parents much, leading to speculation about his appearance. Some suggest he bears a striking resemblance to Michael Jackson's children, particularly in his younger years. There’s a theory that if someone changes their identity, they might undergo significant alterations beyond just cosmetic changes. Interestingly, Donald Trump reportedly pursued Princess Diana after her divorce. The speaker hints at a deeper connection, suggesting that Baron’s features align with Diana’s, presenting this as a coincidence. They promise to reveal more evidence, implying that identifying markers may have been concealed to mislead the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you ever notice Baron doesn't look a lot like his parents? Do you wanna know who he does look like? He just happens to have a very certain resemblance to someone, especially when he was younger. And I don't see that resemblance, but you know who else he looks like? Now, why would that be?
Why would this be? I'll tell you why. Because Michael Jackson's kids wouldn't grow up to look like that. They would grow up to look like that. Just like he is growing up to look like that and clearly came from that.
And you might be saying, well, why in the world would Baron look like Diana? Well, why don't we take a look? In an attempt not to upset the very, very kind content moderators, I'm just gonna present you some information and let you make up your mind. But before you make up your mind completely, stick around to the end because I do have a smoking gun. And, yes, their features are quite different.
But when you switch personalities full time, a mask doesn't cut it. You need to make some permanent improvements. But cosmetics doesn't change the way you sit. It doesn't change the way you wave. And apparently, doesn't even change the way you dress.
And did you know that Donald Trump aggressively pursued Diana after her divorce? They also like to put the truth right in plain sight, not just visually, but audibly. Take a listen. Oh, this is her. This is her.
This is her. This is her. This is her. Uh-huh. Have you ever taken Have you ever taken a look at what Baron Trump looks like?
He resembles someone an awful lot. Gotta just be a coincidence though. Definite coincidence. I did promise you guys a smoking gun though, and I don't wanna disappoint. And if you're smart and you're trying to deceive people, you get rid of identifying markers.
So, of course, they would get rid of that. And And even though I see a little remnants there, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about these. Those. I'll show you.
Now you're gonna fool the masses.
@IanMalcolm84 - IanMalcolm84
Have things gotten better or worse? https://t.co/1sLrChpQII
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether the Western world has improved in the last three decades, citing increases in poverty, obesity, suicide, and drug overdoses. He accuses "Greg," a Jewish panelist, of constantly interrupting and trying to make the discussion about himself.
He attributes societal decline to certain groups gaining power and removing Christian values from schools, replacing them with LGBT pride flags. He links the rainbow flag to the Jewish Oblast and Noahide laws, claiming these laws promote a form of Jewish-led enslavement.
He argues that societal problems are orchestrated by the same people who condemn whites for slavery. He criticizes a pattern of "psychopathic narcissistic behavior," referencing Dave Portnoy's reaction to criticism and suggesting a connection to historical expulsions of Jews. He concludes that these patterns warrant deep self-reflection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lee, I don't care about that. I am just a guy, a libertarian, who wants to help the world, and many Jews wanna
Speaker 1: help the Is the world getting any better?
Speaker 0: That's a loaded question.
Speaker 1: No. It's not a loaded question. Has the Western
Speaker 0: world gotten better or worse over
Speaker 1: the last three decades? Not the whole world, not global poverty, not the average lifestyle of African
Speaker 0: So what are you talking about then? Pick pick a dimension. Right?
Speaker 1: Oh oh, you wanna give me I'll I'll give you some dimensions. In the Western world, have poverty, obesity, employment, suicide, alcoholism
Speaker 0: Perfect.
Speaker 1: Drug overdoses, SSRI use.
Speaker 0: Let's talk
Speaker 1: a single no. No. No. We're you know what, Greg? We're not gonna just talk about it.
This isn't the Greg show.
Speaker 0: It's not about the Jews.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. Greg, you got you just interrupt every time. And this is the problem.
I've given you ten minutes. You got embarrassed nine minutes ago with your it's the Ashkenazi. No. It's not because you got a whole bunch of examples of Sephardic Jews. And then what do you wanna do?
And it's so funny because Mads down in the purple pill commented on this. It's gonna become the Greg show. Why is it that every time we let a Jew up onto the panel, it's I'm here. Ask me questions. Is there some kind of genetic predisposition?
We know that paranoia, schizophrenia, and narcissism runs rampant amongst a certain group of people. Is that perhaps why you would come into a room and say, I'm now here. Let's talk about all these things. There's 10 other people that have been patiently waiting for an hour. But, oh, wow.
I went on a podcast once with Kim Iverson. You've got 11,000 followers. Great. Truth tellers got eight x that. If we take the combined group of the people on this panel, you're nobody.
But you wanna make it about you. You want it to be your conversation. Why is that? Why is it it has to come back to your angles, your topics? You wanna redirect in this route, this route, this route?
Why is that? Why do Jews do that? Why have they been kicked out of a hundred and nine different countries a thousand plus times? Have things gotten better or worse? Let's talk about it, you eagerly said.
Walk through the mall, Greg. Do people look healthier than they were thirty years ago? Not a chance. Look at culture, Greg. Is the music better or is it worse?
Do you remember thirty years ago? Do you remember obese black women at the Oscars grinding on each other while flames were in the background and a whole bunch of people, like sycophants sitting there celebrating the beauty of it? Would people have looked at Lizzo thirty years ago and said, there's a healthy, happy, productive member of society? No. Thirty years ago, did you have trans people reading story time to children and having it clapped about by a bunch of liberals?
No. Do you know why? Because only fifty years ago, that would have been labeled a mental illness. That person would have probably been put in an institution. And now I am a bigot for opposing it.
Have things gotten better or worse, Greg? You know what I'm now gonna do? I'm gonna put up a thread that I made about a year ago on how everything's getting worse. Do you know how much worse, Greg? So much worse that if you actually take into account inflation, what you find is that your average person today has less purchasing power for things like eggs, milk, cars, homes than they did during the great depression, Greg.
Are they getting better or are they getting worse? They're clearly getting worse, which is why suicide is skyrocketing, why Canada is pushing to literally legalize assisted suicide, to normalize it. They wanna make it government assisted. Let's put advertisement. Are you depressed?
Do you wanna just end it all? Well, come in and we'll make it extra glorious by making sure you can watch the latest Snow White and the seven diversity hires as we end your life. Because you're miserable. Because everything's getting worse Just like it did where else? Greg.
Was it Weimar Germany? Was it in Russia under the Bolsheviks? What do those have in common, Greg? So you could sit there and you can you can act like an absolute lunatic and say, I think things are great. Great.
Even though literally according to statistics, to be middle class, you now have to be in the top 10% of income earners. 10%. What does that mean about the 90% below them, Greg? It means that they're impoverished. They are now lower class.
You have taken a healthy productive society that just a couple decades ago looked like Dennis the Menace. With families able to afford it, a reasonable sized home to send their kid to a school that was safe, that was productive, that had values, like Christianity, Greg, that your religion would suggest our God is burning in a vat of excrement in hell. And because certain groups of people got power, they got to go in and say, you know what we need to remove from schools and from all the public facilities? Was that crucifix. Because that crucifix, that is really offensive.
Offensive to who? Greg. Is the people that believe that guy's burning in hell? Wow. I wonder if it is.
Do you know what they replaced those crucifixes with, Greg? With LGBT pride flags. With their their kids literally put with a rainbow over top of them and march down the street celebrating that they can be a boy or a girl if they want to. Have things gotten better or have they gotten worse, Greg? And you know where that that rainbow comes from?
Is it weird that the Jewish Oblast has the exact same flag and that it oh, by the way, also is the Noahide law flag. Do you know what the Noahide laws are, Greg? It's everybody being essentially a slave to Jews, which is what Zionism is, which is what I oppose. So if you wanna say are things getting better or worse, they might be getting better for the group of people that is being dumbed down if they should be enjoying slavery, which they shouldn't. And do you know why slavery is bad?
Because it's been the people on TV for generations that have been scolding and shaming whites for slavery that was orchestrated disproportionately by the very people that have been doing the oppressing, the very people doing the brainwashing, the very people doing the shaming and guilting. So no more, Greg. People aren't going to listen to it. They're not going to pay attention. You don't get to come in and say, I'm the center of attention.
Ask me questions. We don't care, Greg. What we care about is making the world better. We're not going to listen to any more liars and lunatics saying, it's, oh, you guys are just like feminists trying to find a problem and saying it's all the men. Because like truth tellers said, they're largely Jewish men, Greg.
And so we're going to notice that common denominator. And then when you sit there and say the feminist and truth interrupts you and says, who pushed that one, Greg? Was it Jews? Who pushed racial dynamics? Who got rid of Malcolm x?
Because he talked about the Jews. Who got rid of Martin Luther King for what it's worth? And where did he get his ideologies? Was it through literal communists? And where did communism come from, Greg?
Have things gotten better or worse? It's not an open ended question because I'm tired of it, and I'm tired on behalf of everybody in here. It's obnoxious. The continued need and desire to be at the center of everything is obnoxious. It's why Dave Portnoy has to be worshiped and idolized by everybody.
And when someone holds up a sign that says, f you people, what is the response? It's for him to try and destroy the very person that dared to have the audacity to hold up the sign in the first place or at least to sponsor it financially or whatever his involvement was. But maybe the very behavior that Dave Portnoy is doing is the reason for the sign, Greg. This isn't about anti Semitism. It's not about hating anybody.
It's about being really tired of patterns, patterns of psychopathic narcissistic behavior. That's what Portnoy did, and that's what I believe there's a pattern of which might relate to that one zero nine number. And if you wanna suggest that it's just crazy talking points, well then we've got over a thousand different times where people maybe arrived at a similar conclusion. And so maybe it's time to take a really deep look in the mirror. But guess who probably won't do that?
A narcissist. And what would statistics say that you might be? Well, I'll let you finish that equation.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
This was 14 years ago. Nothing has changed. https://t.co/vUQmiEzTOd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tempers flared at the prestigious National Press Club in Washington DC. A pro Israeli advocate knocked a camera out of the hands of Alison Weir, president of the council for the National Interest Foundation. The group just finished their press conference on what they call unjustifiable USA to Israel. CNIF alleges Israel received so much aid and special treatment because the US congress is controlled by APAC, America's pro Israeli lobby. "$3,000,000,000,000. That's including a massive amount of direct money to Israel, then a lot of hidden costs." Giraldi is a former CIA counterterrorism expert. He questions why America gives aid to Israel when Israel conducts more espionage for profit against The US than any other US friendly country. They steal military technology. They steal information that is useful for telecommunications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With them. I have talked to them.
Speaker 1: Tempers flared at the prestigious National Press Club in Washington DC.
Speaker 0: As an independent You have gone there as a radical leftist who hates Jews Okay. And in order to radical. Don't you stay safe in face.
Speaker 1: A pro Israeli advocate knocked a camera out of the hands of Alison Weir, president of the council for the National Interest Foundation. The group just finished their press conference on what they call unjustifiable USA to Israel. The two sides met when the press club scheduled a pro Israeli news conference to follow held in the same room. The altercation illustrates heightened tensions on differing views regarding America's relationship with Israel. The council for the National Interest Foundation wants Americans to know how much of their tax dollars are going to Israel.
$3,000,000,000,000. That's including a massive amount of direct money to Israel, then a lot of hidden costs. CNIF alleges Israel received so much aid and special treatment because the US congress is controlled by APAC, America's pro Israeli lobby. Executive director Philip Girardi says Israel spends a lot of money on US elections.
Speaker 0: There are many Israeli packs, and they do give a lot of money very selectively to congressmen that they wanna support.
Speaker 1: The council for the National Interest Foundation says many members of congress fear if they don't always side with Israel, that they will face retaliation in their own reelection campaigns.
Speaker 0: If a congressman, crosses the Israel lobby by voting against aid for Israel or voting against some some legislation that Israel favors, they very often will find that the next time they're running for office, there will be a candidate put up against them who is very well funded.
Speaker 1: Giraldi is a former CIA counterterrorism expert. He questions why America gives aid to Israel when Israel conducts more espionage for profit against The US than any other US friendly country.
Speaker 0: They steal military technology. They steal information that is useful for telecommunications.
Speaker 1: Retired lieutenant colonel Karen Kotowski works at the Pentagon and says Israel receives preferential treatment. We do not question what the Israelis want. Kotowski believes America is beginning to take more interest in US foreign policy in The Middle East in large part due to tough economic times. More and more Americans want to know where their hard earned tax dollars are going and why. Rhonda Pence, Press TV, Washington.
