TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 7, 2023 at 11:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Some speculate that Bragg's indictment is part of a CIA plot to divide Americans and incite violence. Schumer warned Trump in 2017 that the CIA had ways to destroy him, and they are reportedly angry with how he has treated them. The intelligence community has been known to retaliate against those who challenge them.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Could Bragg's Indictment be the latest dirty trick played by the CIA in their Color Revolution to artificially pit Americans against each other to get us to kill each other? On Jan 3, 2017, Senator Schumer very publicly warned Trump the CIA had many ways to destroy him.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

After the CIA spied on Trump in 2016 and conspired with Hillary to frame him for Russian Collusion, Chuck Schumer threatened him: "They are very upset by the way he has treated them. You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the person in question is provoking the intelligence community, despite the potential consequences. They mention that the intelligence community has various means to retaliate against such actions. The speaker suggests that even though the person is seen as a practical and tough businessman, their behavior in this regard is foolish. The speaker also mentions that they have been informed that the intelligence community is displeased with how they have been treated and spoken about.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But he's he's taking these shots, this antagonism that's taunting to the intelligence community. You take on the intelligence community, they have 6 ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for a practical supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's being some really dumb to do this. What do you think the intelligence community would do if they were motivated to? But I from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Saved - September 25, 2023 at 9:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation reflects astonishment at the similarity between Hitler's words and the rhetoric of a current US presidential candidate. The speaker suggests that history is repeating itself, emphasizing the extent of lies and censorship surrounding Hitler. The conversation ends with the speaker expressing speechlessness.

@hanatove83 - Hana Tove

WOW 😲 THIS IS INSANE. HitIer’s words sound as if he is alive today and is running for President of the USA. It’s bonkers how we face the same evil forces today… history is literally repeating itself. No wonder he’s most lied about & censored man in history…speechless.

Saved - October 26, 2023 at 11:51 PM

@samisdatin - samisdat.in📚

"In Hollywood as in Broadway the Jew is the dominant figure. Is it anything less than a misfortune that the motion pictures should have developed into an industry out of the penny arcades of the Jews?" https://t.co/kaCqHrohwA

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 1:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The CIA's alleged involvement in JFK's assassination and the Warren Commission's exoneration of the agency are key points. Nixon's knowledge of the CIA's role and the CIA's framing of him in the Watergate scandal are significant. Ford's selection as Nixon's successor, his involvement in the Warren Commission, and the belief that corruption predates Trump are highlighted. The article emphasizes the public's growing awareness of government corruption and Trump's role in exposing it. The hope is that this will lead to a decline in Trump Derangement Syndrome. Corruption is being exposed rapidly, and the public should be outraged.

@vDarknessFalls8 - vDarkness Falls

The CIA murders JFK. The Warren Commission absolves the CIA. Nixon knows the CIA murdered JFK. 4 of the 5 Watergate burglars work for the CIA. The CIA frames Nixon for Watergate. Ford is chosen as Nixon's replacement. Ford was on the Warren Commission. How on God's Green Earth can anti-Trump liberals ACTUALLY believe corruption in government STARTED in 2016 BECAUSE of Donald Trump? The centerpiece of the downward spiral of our nation will always circle around to that fateful day on November 22nd, 1963. The day our own government murdered a sitting U.S. President on live T.V. who tried to push back against the cabal for We, The People, while a compliant media covered it all up & still does to this day. Corruption is being exposed at the inducted speed of Light. The public should be FURIOUS!!! People are starting to realize our government has been corrupt since it's inception & not only was President Trump NOT responsible for that, he's responsible for helping expose that fact. TDS should be starting to dissappear sooner than later.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The American government's inner workings and the lack of history education are discussed. Richard Nixon, the most popular president, was removed from office and replaced by an unelected president. Nixon believed federal agencies were undermining the system and suggested the CIA's involvement in JFK's assassination. Bob Woodward, a former naval officer with ties to the Nixon White House, wrote dishonest Watergate stories. Woodward's main source was Mark Felt, who ran the FBI's Cointelpro program. The agencies also worked to take down Nixon's Vice President, Spiro Agnew, who was replaced by Gerald Ford. Permanent Washington, unelected officials in federal agencies, controls the political system. General Michael Flynn, who understood the system, was targeted by the agencies. Joe Biden, who laughed at Flynn's destruction, now faces a similar fate. A better system is needed for true democracy. (144 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you want to understand, if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore, one thing you should know is the most popular President in American history was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon. Yet somehow, without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So we went for the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Wait a minute, you may ask, why didn't I know that? Wasn't Richard Nixon a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? No, he wasn't. In fact, if any President could claim to be the people's choice, it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin the popular vote ever recorded before or so. Or just margin the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Nixon got 17,000,000 more votes than his opponent. Less than 2 years later, he was gone. He was forced to resign. And in his place, an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House. How did that happen? What's a long story? But here are the highlights and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of and had been doing that for a long time, he often said that he was absolutely right. On June 23, nineteen seventy two, Nixon met with the then CIA director, Richard Helms, at the White House during the conversation, which thankfully was tape recorded. Nixon suggested he knew, quote, who shot John, meaning President John F. Kennedy. Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. Helms' telling response? Total silence. Violence. But for Nixon, it didn't matter because it was already over. 4 days before, on June 19, the Washington Post did publish the first of many stories about a break in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by The Washington Post, 4 of the 5 burglars worked for the CIA. The first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29 year old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward. Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Well, he wasn't a journalist. Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. Instead, Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon, he had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies. At times, Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White house where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top AIDS. Soon after leaving the Navy for reasons that have never been clear, Woodward was hired by the most powerful a news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. And just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran. And we're not making this up. The Bi's Cointelpro program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy people like Richard Nixon. And at the same time, those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected Vice President, Spiro Agnew. In the fall of 1970 three, Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless Congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. What was Ford's qualification for the job? Well, he had served on the Warren Commission, which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder. Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in Congress. Quote, we gave Nixon no choice but Ford, Speaker of the House Carl Albert later boasted 8 months later, Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the President of the United States. See how that works? So those are the facts, not speculation. All of that actually happened. None of it's secret. Most of it actually is on Wikipedia, but no mainstream news this nation has ever told that story. It's so obvious, yet it's intentionally ignored. And as a result, permanent Washington remains in charge of our political system. Unelected lifers in the federal agencies make the biggest decisions in American government and crush anyone who tries to rein them in. And in the process, our democracy becomes a joke. Now, you may I've noticed that the very first person in the Trump administration the agencies went after was General Michael Flynn. Why Flynn? Because Mike Flynn was a career army intel officer who ran the Defense Intelligence Agency. In other words, Mike Flynn knew exactly how the system worked, and as a result, he was capable of fighting back. 4 days after Donald Trump's inauguration, the FBI lured Mike Flynn into a meeting without his lawyer, concocted a series of fake crimes, and forced him to resign. So that's how things actually work in Washington. Let's stop lying about it. Joe Biden, meanwhile, looped like a hyena when the Justice Department destroyed Mike Flynn. So there is, we have to say, a certain perverse justice in watching something very similar happen to Joe Biden himself 6 years later. Joe Biden does not deserve our sympathy. He's being shafted, but don't weep for him. And yet the rest of us do deserve a better system, an actual democracy. When people nobody voted for run everything, you are not living
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1943, a directive was issued to communists in the US, instructing them to label obstructive individuals as fascist, Nazi, or antisemitic. By associating opponents with these negative terms repeatedly, the public would perceive it as fact. This strategy, reminiscent of the past, is still in use today.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in the United States. It read “When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable build-ups as fascist, or Nazi, or antisemitic, and use the prestige of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. “In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public mind.” Sound familiar? Same playbook is at work today.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1943, a directive was issued to all communists in the United States, instructing them to label certain obstructionists as fascist, Nazi, or anti-Semitic. The goal was to discredit them by associating them with these negative terms and using the reputation of anti-fascist and tolerance organizations. The directive aimed to make the public believe that those who opposed the communists were indeed linked to these derogatory labels through constant repetition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in the United States. It read, when certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them after suitable buildups as fascist or Nazi or anti Semitic. And use the prestige of anti fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell, the association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public mind.
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 9:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Graham expressed his belief that the Zionist influence on the government needs to be addressed. Nixon agreed but couldn't openly say it. This post suggests that Nixon's knowledge of this issue led to his removal. Another post simply states "Nixon Knew."

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Bill Graham: "This Zionist stranglehold on the government must be broken or this country is going down the drain." Nixon: "You believe that?" Graham: "Yes" Nixon: "I believe that too but I can never say it." https://t.co/VPJkfsdmXt

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Nixon knew. And they got rid of him. https://t.co/kUT5swYv6n

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews dominate the government, we need non-Jewish leaders in control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jews are all in the government, and we have got to get in those areas. We've got to get a man in charge who is not Jewish to control the Jewish

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Nixon Knew https://t.co/1s65IvY3V0

@TruthNoticing - World Goyim Unite

@davincentjames @MuricanVeteran #NixonKnew https://t.co/7GFyQ4TjKR

Saved - May 15, 2024 at 1:55 PM

@WojPawelczyk - Wojciech Pawelczyk

John Wayne was right about Hollywood communists: "They were going to take over our business." https://t.co/YMvUiDvMcD

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was not involved in blacklisting alleged communists in Hollywood. It was necessary to prevent radical liberals from taking over the industry. People of all opinions should make movies, but not promote someone else's way of life. Our capitalist way of life has built a prosperous nation in 200 years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to particularly ask you as well because it's related to the film industry about that period in your career in Hollywood when you were to the forefront of the people who were, blacklisting the, alleged communist members of Speaker 1: Well, that's that's that's not a true statement. Well, do what We were not blacklisting. Well, you are They were you named it. No. They were blacklisting. We didn't name anybody. We stayed completely out of it and said, we are Americans. Anybody that wanted to join us was fine. We gave no names out to anybody at any time ever. Speaker 0: But are you but when you look back at that now John, this this space of time, I mean, are you proud of what happened in Hollywood at that time? Speaker 1: I think it was probably a very necessary thing at the time because, the radical liberals were gonna take over our business, and, you wouldn't have had any pictures like that then. Speaker 0: No. But seriously, I mean, do I mean, were they in a position? I mean the people who got kicked out of Hollywood surely though Speaker 1: they were Who were kicked out? Well the people Now wait a minute, tell me who was killed there. Speaker 0: Well the people who left Holland. Let's take a for an example, Carl Forman. Speaker 1: Yeah, Carl Forman. I mean, was Dalton Trumbull? Carlton formed Dalton Trumbull. Speaker 0: Look what happened to Larry Parks. Speaker 1: About, Larry Parks, admitted that he'd been a commie and he went on working. Speaker 0: Well, he didn't work for some time. He'd had Speaker 1: a very Well, he hadn't worked a hell of a lot before that, had he? Speaker 0: No. No. But I mean No. But I mean, these aren't people surely, are they, who you would expect to take over the industry? Speaker 1: Well, at the time, it seemed rather serious. And, they were getting themselves into a position where they could control who would do the writing. Speaker 0: But isn't it, isn't it right that people of all shades of opinion should be able to make movies whether they be extreme right wing or extreme left wing Speaker 1: or Anytime that they're that is their opinion, fine. But, trouble there was that they were spouting by rote, somebody else's way of life. And that's alright for those fellas over there. That's the way they want to live, but we don't have to have it in our country. No. Well, you could say of course that That was our point of view. Speaker 0: Yes. Because your point of view was reflecting the capitalist way of life, the American way of life. Well, and Speaker 1: I don't think that capitalist is such a, an unpopular word. You know? It's, in 200 years, we've taken a wilderness and built a factory that feeds the world, a farm, or that supplies the world, a farm that feeds the world. And we've been doing our best to help everybody out that, that we can, so, I think it's a pretty good way of living.
Saved - June 6, 2024 at 7:10 PM

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Here is JFK warning about a secret group that has infiltrated the American government He was killed several years later https://t.co/wMmqLzAma7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secrecy is unacceptable in a free society. We oppose secret societies, oaths, and proceedings. A global conspiracy uses covert tactics like infiltration and subversion to expand its power. It operates in secrecy, concealing preparations and burying mistakes. Dissent is silenced, and no secrets are revealed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society and we are, as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings for we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned. No rumor is printed. No secret is revealed.
Saved - June 9, 2024 at 6:06 PM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

NIXON: The CIA had a motive to take me out And 2 of the 4 burglars at the Watergate were on the CIA payroll https://t.co/q2UTZ7XyE0

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not sure if there was a CIA conspiracy to remove me from office, but it's possible. The CIA had a motive because I was critical of them and wanted to make changes. I can't say if there was a conspiracy, but it would be interesting for an investigative reporter to look into it. I don't think the CIA would go as far as to harm those who expose their operations nowadays.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think there was or could have been a CIA conspiracy to remove you from office? Speaker 1: I don't know. I know many people think so. I would say that I've had it found it difficult to understand why the CIA, which apparently had advanced knowledge of the break in, didn't inform me. I found it difficult to understand how it could have been, that at least 2 of those involved, had CIA connections. And nevertheless, that it was not brought to my attention as far as the break in occurring. I must say too, the CIA had motive. It was no secret that I was dissatisfied with the CIA, with its reports and particularly, with their appraisals of Soviet strength and our other problems around the world. Speaker 0: Do you think they feared you? Speaker 1: No question about it and they had reason to. I was gonna shape up that organization and the defense department, the whole government for that matter, but particularly that one. In one occasion, I said I thought we could cut a third of the people out of the CIA and do a better job. I didn't wanna weaken it as unfortunately it was castrated in the post Watergate era. I wanted to strengthen it. I wanted to get rid of some of the dead wood and so forth and they knew it. So they had a motive. I'm not prepared to say whether there was a conspiracy or not. I would only say that, it should make a fascinating study for an investigative reporter. He won't win any prizes by writing anything that would not be anti Nixon, but on the other hand, it would perhaps be historically interesting. Speaker 0: If there was such a conspiracy, do you think that reporter would, would ever live to write about it? Is it the kind of thing that will ever come out? Speaker 1: I have a feeling that all of this talk that the CIA is gonna knock off those that will, shall we say, reveal some of their covert operations, those in this country, I think that's exaggerated. I think that may have been the case in times past, not now.
Saved - October 11, 2024 at 7:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Spiro Agnew, Nixon's Vice President, resigned over issues unrelated to Watergate and faced significant backlash after publishing a novel that criticized Jewish influence in media. He claimed this influence affected his career and was later vindicated regarding his views. Additionally, a discussion between Nixon and Billy Graham in 1972 highlighted concerns about Jewish control over media and banking, suggesting parallels to historical events in Germany. I invite you to subscribe to my Twitter for more insights.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker-ucas Gage🇺🇲

🇺🇸🇮🇱 Spiro Agnew was the Vice President under Richard Nixon. Like Nixon, Agnew was forced to resign from office, but for issues unrelated to Watergate. However, unlike Nixon, you don't hear much about him. That might be because he was essentially canceled. After he left office, he published a "fictional" novel in which the Vice President character in the book refers to "jewish cabals & zionist lobbies" and their hold over the American media. On the book tour, he asserted that this was also true in real life--a claim for which the ADL attacked him. He defended himself, saying "My contention is that routinely the American news media...favors the israeli position & does not in a balanced way present the other equities." Years later, in a letter to Fahd bin Abdulaziz--the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia--he recounted how he'd been "bled dry" by zionist attacks on him, and blamed them for forcing him out of office. At the time, his charges were easily dismissed & his reputation smeared through that era's version of lawfare, but in hindsight I think it's safe to say he's been vindicated on the jewish/zionist points. Check out this beauty of a quote below about the American media & US Middle East policy, and tell me--where's the lie?

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker-ucas Gage🇺🇲

🇺🇸🇱🇧🇵🇸🇮🇱 'EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN EVERY ONE OF THOSE OFFICES WAS A ZIONIST OR ISRAELI' Kay Griggs tells her shocking experience visiting the Near East section of the US State Department in 1986. She describes how some of them had even changed their names to sound American. https://t.co/5MR3uYeD6j

Video Transcript AI Summary
Catherine Pollard Griggs, wife of Colonel George Griggs, states her husband was the liaison between the White House and President Jamal of Beirut, Lebanon, at the time of the Marine barracks bombing. She claims her husband told her they knew the bombing was coming. Griggs says she visited the State Department's Near East section to learn about Middle East peace. She alleges the offices were dominated by Zionists and Israelis, with pictures of Israel and Israeli materials displayed. She says there were no Palestinians, Muslims, or Christians in those offices. Griggs claims David Satterfield's family were Zionists who changed their name. She says Satterfield's talk at the World Affairs Council was biased towards Israel. She also says the State Department spokesman at the time was a Zionist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your name is, Catherine Pollard Griggs? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: You are the wife of colonel George Griggs? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Your, husband was the liaison between the White House and president Jamal of Beirut, Lebanon at the time of the bombing of the marine barracks in, Lebanon? Yes. And in fact, he told you that they knew the bombing was coming down in Beirut before it occurred. Speaker 1: Absolutely. I went to the state department one day because I was curious about why there isn't peace in the Middle East. And I wanted to go to what I thought was the Middle East Department. So I went in. There were about, oh, 8 or 10 offices. I went in every single one. I was looking to find out who the, leaders were. I knew about Aaron David Miller. I knew about David Satterfield, who really wasn't David Satterfield. His family were Zionists who changed their name to David Satterfield, who was a Virginian senator back in the thirties who had a wonderful name. It's like Jonathan Pollard. He took the name Pollard, which wasn't his name because of governor Pollard. I was married to governor Pollard's grandson for 21 years. They they take the names of honorable people and then they're not honorable. There is this idea that go ahead and change it and be somebody else, kind of a snake, you know, changing colors for the moment, not being honorable and truthful. David Satterfield the reason I went there was because in the spring, I went to a dinner. It was either a dinner or a luncheon that the, World Affairs Council had in Norfolk and he was speaking. And I'm very interested in peace because as a Christian Sure. I want it. I know it's possible if people are reasonable. And this talk that that, David Satterfield gave, there were probably 20 mentions of Israel to one of the Palestinians. He was extremely biased, arrogant. The arrogance is what bothers me because you can't have peace, you can't have justice where there's imbalance. Well, after having heard the bias and so forth, I went into the state department, near east section and found there was not one single Palestinian, not one single Muslim, religious, Saudi, you know, Jordanian. Not one Christian president. Not one Roman Catholic. Not one plain old American, whatever from corn pong. Every single person in all of those offices were either Zionist, Israelis, whatever. And they had pictures all over the wall of Israel, Israel, Israel. They had magazines, Israel Today. You know, I was given a copy of 1. And there were yarmulkes, you know, and the Israeli writing. In other words and I asked one of the women after having gone through about, you know, 4 or 5 of these offices, I said because I was pretending like I really, you know, wanted I was just kind of wanting to know where where the Palestinian office was, you know. She said, Well, we handle all of that. We handle all of that. Speaker 0: And this is the State Department, the Speaker 1: Near East. The the part that handles Israel, Jordan. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: All these. Speaker 0: Egypt. Speaker 1: Yeah. The Near East section. Speaker 0: Yeah. It was just totally dominated by Totally. Israeli. Speaker 1: Totally. Mhmm. And at that time, the spokesman I can't remember his name. He was, a Zionist. Speaker 0: The Speaker 1: spokesman for the whole state department

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker-ucas Gage🇺🇲

📺🇺🇸🇮🇱 In February 1972, President Richard Nixon and Reverend Billy Graham discussed the "stranglehold" jews had on the media & banking in the United States. They compared it to the control the jews had over Germany in the 1930s. Billy Graham emphasized that Hitler went about things wrong, but that the US would also have to break the stranglehold or "this country is going to go down the drain." Shortly after this, in June 1972, the Watergate break-in occurred that eventually led to Nixon resigning. 🇮🇱 Was Nixon railroaded by the same elements that assassinated JFK & RFK because he didn't bow down completely to jewish power and the Israeli lobby? Crazy how his VP Agnew was also jammed by the same guys Nixon criticized, no?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss media influence, with one claiming the media is controlled by a "solid block of people." They differentiate between Israeli Jews, whom they consider the "best," and other Jews. One speaker asserts that a Democrat paid the communists and Russians. One speaker references a distinction in the Bible between the "synagogue of Satan" and the "remnant of God's people," attributing religious deceptions to the former, who they believe are energized by supernatural power. They claim this group had a "stranglehold" on Germany's banking and everything else and that this stranglehold must be broken in the U.S. or the country will go down the drain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, they did. They're gonna turn the country that way. They don't believe that they actually believe it. They did that kind of thing with smart hands. They reviewed That's right. They don't believe in that, sir. They don't they they also they don't believe in such as the Reader's Digest. No. They they it's carnival. They like that pornographic stuff that appears in the light, which I hope goes down the drain and continues the kind Speaker 1: of crime. By the way, headless Donavan has just invited me to have lunch with all their editors here on March 7th. And I was quite amazed because it's the first time I've heard from Time and used I mean, Time Magazine's Henry Luzak. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It means that all the energy Speaker 1: that are digged here. Is that right? I don't know any of them now. Speaker 0: The best Jews actually are the Israeli Jews. That's right. Because Israel, the reason Mrs. Meyger supports me in what she does, at Diana does duties for a very fundamental reason, has nothing to do with crisis involving, Jordan, that I've faced the Russians down for. She knows I'm the only one who will know it. She knows that a Democrat paid with the communists, the Russians. So that's the point. She's tough. We talked about this. Rabin is the same way. Rabin, of course, slowly. Russian too. However, in this country, we must be under no obligation. You're aware of that urge. You're aware of the fact that the in the media, we we confront, almost a solid block of people. They don't it isn't the aim, and he just he's the point of the thing. They're everything because he took the whole thing on. And it has nothing to do with the anti Semitism. It happens, though. That insofar as the media is concerned, the power of media They've got it. They've got it right by the way. Speaker 1: And they're the ones putting out pornographic stuff and putting out everything. I know why You see the bible makes a distinction, mister president, between Speaker 0: 2 groups of Jews. Speaker 1: 1 is called the synagogue of Satan. Speaker 0: Yeah. You did that. You know it's the art of the Speaker 1: church? Yes. Called the remnant of God's people, which will be Jewish people. Yeah. And then there's the synagogue of Satan. And nearly all of your religious deceptions in the latter days, what the Bible speaks, latter days to be a 1000 years, what they call the synagogue of Satan. In other words, they are energized by supernatural power called the devil. This is what the Bible teaches. When you believe it or don't believe it, this Speaker 0: is the biblical teaching, and Speaker 1: this is what I believe. And I believe that you have the they have a they have a strange brilliance about them. Oh. They have a they That's right, brother. Because they're smart. They're smart. And they and and they are energized in my judgment by supernatural power. But also Speaker 0: they do something else. They're not an aspiring business. Speaker 1: And you see and, of course, Hitler didn't, they had a stranglehold on Germany, on the banking of Germany, on everything in Germany. And they they had the whole thing, you see. And if but he went about it wrong. But but this stranglehold has got to be broken or this country is gonna go down to drain. You believe that? Speaker 0: Yes, sir. I can never say it, but I believe it. No. Speaker 1: But it's different. I like it. The second time, you know, I'd Speaker 0: be Speaker 1: able to do something.

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker-ucas Gage🇺🇲

The "national impact media" https://t.co/Vzfe4Mdk9n

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker-ucas Gage🇺🇲

If you like the information I bring you, please consider subscribing to my Twitter. Go to my profile and hit 'subscribe'

Saved - November 6, 2024 at 4:23 AM

@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸

Why would I unify with Democrats who were actively pushing for Communism? https://t.co/SUbm2DaHJS

Saved - January 23, 2025 at 7:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the assassination of JFK by the CIA marks a pivotal moment in our nation's history, one that continues to reveal deep-rooted government corruption. The Warren Commission's findings and Nixon's involvement in Watergate, with CIA connections, highlight a long-standing pattern of deceit. It's baffling that some think corruption began in 2016 with Trump, when in reality, it has been pervasive since the beginning. People are finally waking up to this truth, and the urgency to expose these issues is more critical than ever.

@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig

The CIA murders JFK. The Warren Commission absolves the CIA. Nixon knows the CIA murdered JFK. 4 of the 5 Watergate burglars work for the CIA. The CIA frames Nixon for Watergate. Ford is chosen as Nixon's replacement. Ford was on the Warren Commission. How on God's Green Earth can anti-Trump liberals ACTUALLY believe corruption in government STARTED in 2016 BECAUSE of Donald Trump? The centerpiece of the downward spiral of our nation will always circle around to that fateful day on November 22nd, 1963. The day our own government murdered a sitting U.S. President on live T.V. who tried to push back against the cabal for We, The People, while a compliant media covered it all up & still does to this day. Corruption is being exposed at the inducted speed of Light. The public should be FURIOUS!!! People are starting to realize our government has been corrupt since it's inception & not only was President Trump NOT responsible for that, he's responsible for helping expose that fact. People are awake now more than any other point in history and they're starting to SEE it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To understand how the American government operates, consider the case of Richard Nixon, the most popular president in U.S. history, who was forced to resign without a single vote against him. Nixon believed federal agencies were undermining democracy. His downfall began with the Watergate scandal, which was reported by Bob Woodward, a former naval officer with ties to intelligence agencies. The investigation was fueled by Mark Felt, the FBI's deputy director, who was involved in discrediting Nixon. Following Nixon's resignation, Gerald Ford, who had served on the Warren Commission, became president. This illustrates how unelected officials can control the political system, undermining democracy. The targeting of figures like General Michael Flynn shows the ongoing struggle against this entrenched power. Ultimately, when unvoted individuals hold power, true democracy is compromised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you want to understand, if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore, one thing you should know is the most popular President in American history was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon. Yet somehow, without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So we went for the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Wait a minute. You may ask, why didn't I know that? Wasn't Richard Nixon a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? No, he wasn't. In fact, if any President could claim to be the people's choice, it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin, the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Nixon got 17,000,000 more votes than his opponent. Less than 2 years later, he was gone. He was forced to resign. And in his place, an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House. How did that happen? What's a long story? But here are the highlights and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of government and had been doing that for a long time. He often said that he was absolutely right. On June 23, 1972, Nixon met with the then CIA director, Richard Helms, at the White House. During the conversation, which thankfully was tape recorded, Nixon suggested he knew, quote, who shot John, meaning President John F. Kennedy. Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. Helms' telling response, total silence. But for Nixon, it didn't matter because it was already over. 4 days before, on June 19th, the Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by the Washington Post, 4 of the 5 burglars worked for the CIA. The first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29 year old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward. Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Well, he wasn't a journalist. Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. Instead, Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon. He had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies. At times, Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House, where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top AIDS. Soon after leaving the Navy for reasons that have never been clear, Woodward was hired by the most powerful news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. And just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran. And we're not making this up. The FBI's Cointel Pro program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy people like Richard Nixon. And at the same time, those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected Vice President, Spiro Agnew. In the fall of 1973, Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless Congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. What was Ford's qualification for the job? Well, he had served on the Warren Commission, which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder. Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in Congress. Quote, we gave Nixon no choice but Ford, Speaker of the House, Carl Albert later boasted. 8 months later, Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the President of the United States. See how that works. So those are the facts, not speculation. All of that actually happened. None of it's secret. Most of it actually is on Wikipedia, but no mainstream news organization has ever told that story. It's so obvious, yet it's intentionally ignored. And as a result, permanent Washington remains in charge of our political system. Unelected lifers in the federal agencies make the biggest decisions in American government and crush anyone who tries to rein them in. And in the process, our democracy becomes a joke. Now you may have noticed that the very first person in the Trump administration the agencies went after was General Michael Flynn. Why Flynn? Because Mike Flynn was a career army intel officer who ran the Defense Intelligence Agency. In other words, Mike Flynn knew exactly how the system worked, and as a result, he was capable of fighting back. 4 days after Donald Trump's inauguration, the FBI lured Mike Flynn into a meeting without his lawyer, concocted a series of fake crimes, and forced him to resign. So that's how things actually work in Washington. Let's stop lying about it. Joe Biden, meanwhile, looked like a hyena when the Justice Department destroyed Mike Flynn. So there is, we have to say, a certain perverse justice in watching something very similar happen to Joe Biden himself 6 years later. Joe Biden does not deserve our sympathy. He's being shafted, but don't weep for him. And yet the rest of us do deserve a better system, an actual democracy. When people nobody voted for run everything, you are not living
Saved - January 23, 2025 at 2:10 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

*Israel AND the CIA murders JFK. (But mostly Israel.)

@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig

The CIA murders JFK. The Warren Commission absolves the CIA. Nixon knows the CIA murdered JFK. 4 of the 5 Watergate burglars work for the CIA. The CIA frames Nixon for Watergate. Ford is chosen as Nixon's replacement. Ford was on the Warren Commission. How on God's Green Earth can anti-Trump liberals ACTUALLY believe corruption in government STARTED in 2016 BECAUSE of Donald Trump? The centerpiece of the downward spiral of our nation will always circle around to that fateful day on November 22nd, 1963. The day our own government murdered a sitting U.S. President on live T.V. who tried to push back against the cabal for We, The People, while a compliant media covered it all up & still does to this day. Corruption is being exposed at the inducted speed of Light. The public should be FURIOUS!!! People are starting to realize our government has been corrupt since it's inception & not only was President Trump NOT responsible for that, he's responsible for helping expose that fact. People are awake now more than any other point in history and they're starting to SEE it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To understand how the American government operates, consider Richard Nixon, the most popular president, who was forced to resign without a vote, replaced by Gerald Ford, the only unelected president. Nixon believed federal agencies were undermining the government. In 1972, he suggested to CIA Director Richard Helms that the CIA was involved in JFK's assassination. Shortly after, the Watergate scandal emerged, led by Bob Woodward, a former naval officer with ties to intelligence agencies. The FBI's Mark Felt was Woodward's main source, and the agencies aimed to discredit Nixon and Vice President Spiro Agnew, who resigned. Ford, tied to the Warren Commission, became president. This illustrates how unelected officials influence politics, undermining democracy. A similar fate befell General Michael Flynn in the Trump administration, showing the system's flaws. Ultimately, the public deserves a true democracy, not control by those who are unelected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you want to understand, if you really want to understand how the American government actually works at the highest levels and if you want to know why they don't teach history anymore, one thing you should know is the most popular President in American history was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon. Yet somehow, without a single vote being cast by a single American voter, Richard Nixon was kicked out of office and replaced by the only unelected president in American history. So we went for the most popular president to a president nobody voted for. Wait a minute. You may ask, why didn't I know that? Wasn't Richard Nixon a criminal? Wasn't he despised by all decent people? No, he wasn't. In fact, if any President could claim to be the people's choice, it was Richard Nixon. Richard Nixon was reelected in 1972 by the largest margin, the popular vote ever recorded before or since. Nixon got 17,000,000 more votes than his opponent. Less than 2 years later, he was gone. He was forced to resign. And in his place, an obedient servant of the federal agencies called Gerald Ford took over the White House. How did that happen? What's a long story? But here are the highlights and they tell you a lot. Richard Nixon believed that elements in the federal bureaucracy were working to undermine the American system of government and had been doing that for a long time. He often said that he was absolutely right. On June 23, 1972, Nixon met with the then CIA director, Richard Helms, at the White House. During the conversation, which thankfully was tape recorded, Nixon suggested he knew, quote, who shot John, meaning President John F. Kennedy. Nixon further implied that the CIA was directly involved in Kennedy's assassination, which we now know it was. Helms' telling response, total silence. But for Nixon, it didn't matter because it was already over. 4 days before, on June 19th, the Washington Post had published the first of many stories about a break in at the Watergate office building. Unbeknownst to Nixon and unreported by the Washington Post, 4 of the 5 burglars worked for the CIA. The first of many dishonest Watergate stories was written by a 29 year old Metro reporter called Bob Woodward. Who exactly was Bob Woodward? Well, he wasn't a journalist. Bob Woodward had no background whatsoever in the news business. Instead, Bob Woodward came directly from the classified areas of the federal government. Shortly before Watergate, Woodward was a naval officer at the Pentagon. He had a top secret clearance. He worked regularly with the intel agencies. At times, Woodward was even detailed to the Nixon White House, where he interacted with Richard Nixon's top AIDS. Soon after leaving the Navy for reasons that have never been clear, Woodward was hired by the most powerful news outlet in Washington and assigned the biggest story in the country. And just to make it crystal clear what was actually happening, Woodward's main source for his Watergate series was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt. And Mark Felt ran. And we're not making this up. The FBI's Cointel Pro program, which was designed to secretly discredit political actors the federal agencies wanted to destroy people like Richard Nixon. And at the same time, those same agencies were also working to take down Nixon's elected Vice President, Spiro Agnew. In the fall of 1973, Agnew was indicted for tax evasion and forced to resign. His replacement was a colorless Congressman from Grand Rapids called Gerald Ford. What was Ford's qualification for the job? Well, he had served on the Warren Commission, which absolved the CIA of responsibility for President Kennedy's murder. Nixon was strong armed into accepting Gerald Ford by Democrats in Congress. Quote, we gave Nixon no choice but Ford, Speaker of the House, Carl Albert later boasted. 8 months later, Gerald Ford of the Warren Commission was the President of the United States. See how that works. So those are the facts, not speculation. All of that actually happened. None of it's secret. Most of it actually is on Wikipedia, but no mainstream news organization has ever told that story. It's so obvious, yet it's intentionally ignored. And as a result, permanent Washington remains in charge of our political system. Unelected lifers in the federal agencies make the biggest decisions in American government and crush anyone who tries to rein them in. And in the process, our democracy becomes a joke. Now you may have noticed that the very first person in the Trump administration the agencies went after was General Michael Flynn. Why Flynn? Because Mike Flynn was a career army intel officer who ran the Defense Intelligence Agency. In other words, Mike Flynn knew exactly how the system worked, and as a result, he was capable of fighting back. 4 days after Donald Trump's inauguration, the FBI lured Mike Flynn into a meeting without his lawyer, concocted a series of fake crimes, and forced him to resign. So that's how things actually work in Washington. Let's stop lying about it. Joe Biden, meanwhile, looked like a hyena when the Justice Department destroyed Mike Flynn. So there is, we have to say, a certain perverse justice in watching something very similar happen to Joe Biden himself 6 years later. Joe Biden does not deserve our sympathy. He's being shafted, but don't weep for him. And yet the rest of us do deserve a better system, an actual democracy. When people nobody voted for run everything, you are not living
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 4:43 AM

@AtRealBen - Real Ben

I always wondered why Nixon was so hated; he knew 👇🏻 https://t.co/7WOz3Jv0gc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The provided transcript appears to contain a repetitive sequence of characters ("的 的 一 个 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人"). It does not form a coherent sentence or convey a meaningful message. Therefore, a concise summary is not possible. A shorter version would simply be a repetition of a smaller portion of the original meaningless phrase.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 的 一 个 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 的 人
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 2:08 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Well, boys. Shut ‘er down. It ain’t gonna get any more fucking embarrassing than this.🤣 (Kirk and Lindsay) https://t.co/sMI6fUjZAI

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Boy, that sounds terrible. What could’ve possibly set them off on their “Jew-hating” rampage? Any ideas?

Saved - February 21, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

http://UnhumansBook.com

Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions (and How to Crush Them) This First Edition of Unhumans has been personally signed by Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec. It includes a COA from Premiere Collectibles. premierecollectibles.com

@JamesKMillsIII - James Mills

Wait wait wait. You're telling me we have Donald Trump as president because of Joseph McCarthy? 🤯 @JackPosobiec @JoshuaLisec https://t.co/JHkH3hdRrE

Saved - March 1, 2025 at 9:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The release of the Epstein files is just another example of how the truth is obscured. Throughout history, key events like the USS Liberty attack, JFK's assassination, and 9/11 have been shrouded in lies and cover-ups. From the Gulf of Tonkin incident to MKUltra and COINTELPRO, the government has manipulated narratives and silenced dissent. The Church Committee revealed media control, and the Iran-Contra Affair showcased manufactured chaos. Ultimately, regardless of who is in power, the same system operates, ensuring the truth remains hidden and the narrative controlled.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The Epstein file release is a joke. Are you surprised? We will never get the truth. Not from their documents. Not from their hearings. They don’t work for you. They work against you. Let’s take a look at some of their greatest lies ⬇️ A thread of redacted history⬇️ https://t.co/r2OZJQejoz

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

June 8, 1967. The USS Liberty was attacked by Israel. 34 Americans dead. 171 wounded. Israel called it a "mistake." Survivors called it intentional. The U.S. government covered it up. The crew was silenced. Decades later, the CIA and NSA still hide key files. Even the declassified ones are blacked out.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

JFK. November 22, 1963. Shot in broad daylight. Blamed on a lone gunman. The CIA and Mossad—working together—made sure the truth stayed buried. Even now, key files are still blacked out. This wasn’t just an assassination. It was a test. They learned what people would accept—and never stopped.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

9/11 Commission Report You know the story. You don’t know the truth. 📄 Pages missing from the report. 🛑 Internal, Saudi, and Israeli involvement—buried. 📂 The Pentagon held back key files. And yet, somehow: - A passport survived fireballs and rubble—perfectly intact. - Steel beams melted, but not the black boxes. - Dancing Israelis watched it all unfold. The truth? Still buried under the rubble.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Pearl Harbor. December 7, 1941. They say it was a surprise attack. It wasn’t. 📡 Intercepted Japanese messages warned of it. 📂 Key intelligence—ignored. 🛑 Certain files remained classified for decades. An attack they could have stopped. A war they wanted. They call it a day of infamy. They’re right. But not for them— for us.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Gulf of Tonkin. 1964. A fake attack that dragged America into Vietnam. The U.S. claimed North Vietnam attacked a Navy ship. The truth? It never happened. 📂 Declassified NSA reports confirm it was a lie. 🛑 Files were censored for decades. Names still redacted. 58,000 Americans sent to die. Millions more never came back the same. All for a war they never intended to win.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Operation Northwoods. March 13, 1962. The U.S. military plotted terror attacks against its own people. 🚨 Hijackings & bombings on U.S. soil. 🚨 Massacres staged for the cameras. 🚨 A fake passenger plane—blown out of the sky. JFK said no.A year later, he was dead. A catalyst? Maybe. A warning? Definitely. The plan never died. It evolved. It improved.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

MKUltra. The CIA’s mind-control program. Torture. Drugging. Psychological warfare. Without consent. On U.S. citizens. 📂 They destroyed most of the evidence in the ‘70s. What’s left? Blacked-out files, missing pages— and whispers of something worse. 🔗 Their most infamous subject? Ted Kaczynski—the Unabomber. A Harvard student, of course☠️ 🔎 And their most ambitious subject? You. The experiment never ended.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Operation Paperclip. What happened after WWII? 🚀 NASA. 🧪 Biological warfare. 🧠 Mind control experiments. Over 1,600 Nazi scientists were secretly brought to America. And after that? I wish I could tell you. But some rabbit holes go too deep. 👁️ https://t.co/T8Y5fKBO7u

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

COINTELPRO. The FBI’s war on dissent. 🕵️‍♂️ Spied. 📝 Blackmailed. 🔇 Silenced. They targeted civil rights leaders, journalists, and activists. - They wanted Malcolm X gone. - They told MLK to kill himself. - They infiltrated, dismantled, and erased movements before they could grow too powerful. 📂 The files? Heavily redacted. 🎭 The game? Still being played—just under a different name.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The Church Committee (1975). 📰 The CIA paid journalists to push propaganda. 🔪 The FBI plotted assassinations. 📺 The media? Controlled. 📂 The files? Heavily redacted. Some still classified. Think that ended? - Obama made propaganda legal with Smith-Mundt. - Trump let “influencers” handle the Epstein files. 🕹️ The machine never changes. Just the operators.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The Iran-Contra Affair. The U.S. government sold weapons, funded terrorists, and flooded America with drugs. 🔫 Sold arms to Iran. 💰 Used the money to fund Contra rebels. 💊 Trafficked drugs into U.S. cities. The result? War. Chaos. The crack epidemic. 📂 The files? Still redacted, of course. They don’t solve problems. They manufacture them. And then they sell you the cure.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The Pentagon Papers (1971). Vietnam was never about winning. The U.S. government knew it was lost—but kept it going anyway. 📄 7,000 pages of classified lies—leaked. 🛑 Presidents from Truman to Nixon covered it up. 📂 Files are still redacted today. And how many wars since then have followed the exact same script?

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

How does this all work? It doesn’t matter who’s in power. Obama, Trump, the next guy, the last guy—they all serve the same machine. The last president who tried to stop it had his skull shattered into pieces...in broad daylight. A warning. A message. A lesson. The game never changed, only the faces. From Operation Mockingbird to Smith-Mundt, from MKUltra to influencers reading from the same script. Things may look different, but the playbook stays the same. They don’t just control the news. They control the narrative. They don’t just rewrite history. They program reality. They don’t work for us. They work against us. And as long as they hold the pen, the truth will always come blacked out.

Saved - March 19, 2025 at 11:23 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

The JFK files show that the CIA were engaged in: -Regime change -Biological warfare -Political/Psychological warfare -Global media control -Mass propaganda Sound familiar? There are so many parallels between what happened then and what is happening now. The CIA never changed. https://t.co/4r9mDnR1l4

Saved - March 23, 2025 at 11:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Reflecting on JFK's "secret societies" speech, I see it now as a warning about a covert entity within our government, which he described as a "monolithic and ruthless conspiracy." He believed this group was behind the Cold War, operating through military, diplomatic, and political means. I believe this same entity persists today, working to eliminate threats to its power. Trump's focus on the JFK files suggests he aims to confront this hidden influence, which explains why the establishment fears him—he seeks to complete JFK's mission.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Knowing what we know now, JFK’s “secret societies” speech makes a lot more sense. JFK tried to warn us about this secret society. He claimed this “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” was responsible for fueling the Cold War. He claimed this entity was a “tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations”. JFK was not talking about the USSR. He was talking about a covert entity that had embedded itself within our government. That same entity exists within our government today, and it tries to overthrow/eliminate anyone that threatens its power. Trump started with the JFK files for a reason. Trump is trying to uproot this same secret entity. It never left. This why the swamp fears Trump. He is trying to finish what JFK started.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that secrecy is repugnant in a free society, and the dangers of unwarranted concealment outweigh those cited to justify it. They state that increased security should not expand to official censorship, and no official should use these words to censor news, stifle dissent, or cover up mistakes. The speaker asks every publisher, editor, and newsman to reexamine their standards and recognize the country's peril. Although no war has been declared, the speaker claims the nation's way of life is under attack, and the danger has never been more clear or imminent. The speaker calls for a change in outlook and tactics by the government, people, and the press, because the nation is opposed by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means, infiltration, subversion, and intimidation. This system combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations, and conducts the Cold War with a wartime discipline.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society. And we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control. And no official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know. But I do ask but I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self discipline to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In times of clear and present danger, the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security. Today, no war has been declared. And however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger, and yet no war has been declared. No borders have been crossed by marching troops. No missiles have been fired. If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of clear and present danger, then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear, and its presence has never been more imminent. It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned. No rumor is printed. No secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War in short. With a wartime discipline, no democracy would ever hope or wish to
Saved - May 11, 2025 at 4:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m addressing Trump supporters who seem unaware of history. The alarming parallels between a potential 2025 Trump administration and Nazi Germany are becoming evident, as terms like "Gestapo" trend. The erosion of rights begins with the disregard for the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Initially targeting those perceived as illegal immigrants, the crackdown extends to legal residents of color, those awaiting citizenship, and eventually US citizens deemed undesirable. This escalating pattern reflects a disturbing authoritarian approach that threatens many.

@maddenifico - Bill Madden

This message is for the dumbest motherfuckers on the planet, Trump supporters — who have ZERO knowledge of history: Due to the American people coming to the horrific realization that 2025 Trump America is a facsimile of 1934 Nazi Germany, "Gestapo" and "Nazi Germany" are trending on X. It starts by ignoring the Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment, which is called the Due Process Clause. The arrests begin with people the Trump regime believes have entered the country illegally; then they go after people who are here legally, but have brown or Black skin and are rightly or wrongly designated as gang members; then they go after people who are here legally, but have yet to get green cards; then they go after people who are on the waiting list to take the US citizen test; then they after US citizens who weren't born in the US; then they go after US citizens who have been convicted of a crime; then they go after US citizens who have been suspected of breaking the law, but have yet to go to court; then they go after US citizens they deem as undesirable; then they go after perceived enemies of the fascist authoritarian Trump regime; then they go after anyone they feel like it just because they can.

Saved - May 23, 2025 at 1:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread featuring my favorite viral memes and invited everyone to contribute their best memes too. The thread includes a total of 19 posts, showcasing a variety of memes, with several bonus memes added at the end for extra fun. I’m excited to see what everyone else has to share!

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

🚨 VIRAL MEME THREAD Check out our favorite Viral Memes and also leave us with your BEST Memes below too! 😎🔥 1/12 🧵 https://t.co/vnGbKspRky

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

2/12 🧵 https://t.co/dfAygzuh01

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

3/12 🧵 https://t.co/X2aPhny9aL

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

4/12 🧵 https://t.co/0B51NI6iDN

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

5/12 🧵 https://t.co/q7JFaXKSCn

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

6/12 🧵 https://t.co/H5KRfbXTP8

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

7/12 🧵 https://t.co/UEvf6vNI4m

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

8/12 🧵 https://t.co/xYe3qTYhso

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

9/12 🧵 https://t.co/ggM7bvcfJ9

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

10/12 🧵 https://t.co/LlNfhM0Xtr

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

11/12 🧵 https://t.co/EK0Eh9koY7

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

12/12 🧵 https://t.co/XpDcOIUz6c

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

13/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/PRU2t1Qazs

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

14/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/dcZoZmZeBD

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

15/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/BNbJNlRBAM

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

16/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/6OFXvAPn9Y

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

17/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/1HpoREq6LD

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

18/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/KewZsUlhm5

@LibertyCappy - Declaration of Memes

19/12 BONUS MEME 🧵 https://t.co/6RJ6BKd9bD

Saved - May 29, 2025 at 10:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On May 29, 1968, significant historical events converged as French Prime Minister Charles De Gaulle fled amid the "Mai 68" riots. I explored the connections between the Vietnam War, the Middle East conflict, and key figures like De Gaulle, MLK, and Arafat. I highlighted the contradictions in protests led by Jewish students in the U.S. and France, and how these events were intertwined with political assassinations and shifts in U.S. foreign policy. The narrative reveals a coordinated effort to eliminate opposition to Israeli interests and the Vietnam War, suggesting a hidden agenda behind these historical moments.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ TODAY, MAY 29, 1968: Vietnam, israel, the Civil Right movement, Palestine, JFK, RFK, MLK & Yasser Arafat all intersect on this day as French Prime Minister Charles De Gaulle Flees the Presidential Élysée Palace as a result of the infamous "Mai 68" riots sweeping his country. There's the story that conventional history tells you about this, and then there's the hidden history I'm going to show you in this thread. You'll definitely want to bookmark this and digest it carefully. I start the story in the middle, at a press conference De Gaulle held on November 27, 1967, in which he connected the Vietnam War to the Middle East conflict & israel. According to De Gaulle, the key to a Palestinian State & Middle East peace was for the United States to exercise its leadership role in the world by bringing together the "Four Great Powers"--the US, UK, USSR & France--and brokering a Middle East peace that included a Palestinian state--which could only realistically happen if the US also exited its war in Vietnam. DeGaulle knew the 2 issues--israel & Vietnam--were connected, as I've been telling you over the last week. The Vietnam War was a jеwish plot. De Gaulle & MLK both inadvertently ran afoul of it. There's SO MUCH MORE to this story.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Fast forward to April/May 1968. At the same time Left-wing radical communist jewish students were leading anti-Vietnam War protests in the US at Columbia University, which then spread around the country--radical Left-wing communist jewish students led protests against De Gaulle's anti-Vietnam War government in France, known famously as "Mai 68." What a curious contradiction, no? In the US, the international jews were protesting the government that was *FOR* the war, while in France the international jews were protesting the government that was *AGAINST* the war. In both cases, the riots were initiated and led by jewish students. At Columbia, they were led by Mark Rudd. In France, they were led by Daniel Cohn Bendit. Of course, the respective protests in each country were couched in a mixture of motives, but when I'm done laying out the timeline below, you'll see what was really going on. The pattern emerges. Another critical thing to remember is that De Gaulle had cut off military aid to israel just days before israel launched the 6-Day War in June 1967. So, that put him on israel's sh*t list. Later, at the end of November 1967, he called for a Palestinian State and came out against the Vietnam War--just as MLK Jr. had similarly started supporting the Palestinians and come out against the war in Vietnam. Then, just a month after jews assassinated MLK (April 1968) which launched yet more riots, the "Mai 68" riots in France forced De Gaulle to resign--under the threat of violence at the presidential Palace. In May 1968, the israelis also hatched an ultimately unsuccessful plot to assassinate Yasser Arafat using a Palestinian MK-Ultra asset. However, the next month, in June 1968, they would succeed in assassinating RFK by framing the Palestinian MK-Ultra asset Sirhan Sirhan. The pattern emerges: MLK, De Gaulle, Arafat--all supported Palestine, opposed israeli imperialism, and in at least the cases of De Gaulle & King, formally opposed the Vietnam War (a war secretly being waged by jews to benefit israel). RFK was only a tepid supporter of israel, because he had to be: that was the new political reality in the US after israel assassinated JFK. But he also represented another threat: had he won the presidency, he could have uncovered israel's treachery and undone everything. All of these transformative leaders had to go! And in one coordinated string of events, worldwide jewry orchestrated their respective assassinations & downfalls.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ VIETNAM - ISRAEL - ASSASSINATIONS - CIVIL RIGHTS TIMELINE: ▪️April 4, 1967: MLK formally announces opposition to Vietnam War. ▪️April 23, 1967: James Earl Ray (the MLK patsy) escapes from Missouri State Penitentiary with the secret help of the FBI. ▪️May 15, 1967: MLK announces plan to visit israel. ▪️June 2, 1967: French PM Charles De Gaulle cuts off military aid to israel. ▪️June 5-10, 1967: 6-Day War ▪️July 24, 1967: In a conference call, MLK expresses doubts about supporting israel in the wake of the war. ▪️July-August 1967: Black riots against alleged police brutality erupt in 150 cities across America. ▪️July 28, 1967: LBJ establishes Kerner Commission to study & address the riots. ▪️July 1967: James Earl Ray, still on the lamb, meets his handler "Raul"--a known associate and weapons trafficking partner of Jack Ruby. This ties the JFK assassination to the MLK assassination. ▪️September 22, 1967: MLK writes to Mordechai Ben-Ami, the president of El Al Air, and formally announces his cancelation of the israel trip. ▪️November 27, 1967: De Gaulle calls for a Palestinian State and US withdrawal from Vietnam in order to be able to lead a peace initiative in the Middle East. ▪️Unspecified Date, Early 1968: MLK begins reaching out to the Palestinian movement, intending to come out in full support of it. ▪️February 29, 1968: Kerner Commission releases findings of its riots investigation: The problem was housing inequality and lack of Black access to White neighborhoods! Surprise! The key to stopping Blacks from rioting is for them to get housing in White communities. ▪️April 4, 1968: MLK is assassinated. James Earl Ray is framed as lone gunman patsy (one year to the day since MLK's declared opposition to Vietnam). ▪️April 4-11, 1968--Riots in 100 cities across the country in response to the MLK assassination. ▪️April 4-11, 1968: Congressman Emanuel Celler (✡️) re-introduces the twice-failed Fair Housing Act (1966, 1967)--which had been dead in the water--back into congress, and this time gets it rammed through on the outrage momentum from the riots & the assassination. Abracadabra! Blacks can now get housing in White areas. ▪️April 11, 1968: LBJ signs FHA into law. The Riots magically stop. ▪️March 27-April 30, May 17-22, 1968: Columbia University anti-Vietnam War protests led by the Left-wing jewish student group SDS (Students For A Democratic Society). Mark Rudd is the leader. ▪️May 2, 1968: Left-wing jewish students launch the famous "Mai 68" protests across France. Daniel Cohn Bendit is the leader, a German national who isn't even a French citizen. ▪️May 29 (Today!), 1968: De Gaulle forced to flee because of the riots. Ultimately is ousted as Prime Minister. ▪️May 1968: MK-Ultra assassination plot against Yasser Arafat proposed by navy psychologist Binyamin Shalit. The attempt turns out unsuccessful. ▪️June 5, 1968: Successful assassination of RFK via MK-Ultra patsy Sirhan Sirhan. RESULTS: -Overthrow of White, Christian America completed -Real & actual opposition to Vietnam War eliminated (jewish fake opposition continued) -True & effectual international support for Palestine stunted -Israeli gains entrenched -Kennedy threat mitigated -jewish power over domestic & foreign policy solidified America fucked. Palestine fucked. jews somehow get everything they want.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ It's honestly terrifying and also mind-blowing just how well they were able to coordinate & execute all these operations in order to achieve their complete list of strategic objectives. Assassinations, international protests, legislation, congressional commissions, prison breaks, patsies, cover-ups, etc. Is it any wonder they were able to pull off 9/11?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Friends, as you can imagine, this research takes a lot of time & work. Elon has demonetized my account, so if you feel it's worth it, please consider supporting me. BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp & crypto are all options. Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Get caught up on the Vietnam War/israel angle: https://t.co/JafvQyGJ78

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE VIETNAM WAR WAS A JЕWISH PLOT, PART 3: "JFK" THE MOVIE. Memorial Day Rage Edition. People are starting to become aware that the movie "JFK" was a sophisticated piece of propaganda that deflected blame for the assassination of JFK away from israel and onto the CIA, the DOD & the Military Industrial Complex (MIC). Pretty much anyone who wasn't israel or jеws. It was produced by the israeli spy & nuclear weapons smuggler Arnon Milchan, Directed by Oliver Stone (jеw), written by Zachary Sklar (jеw), and promoted by RFK's press secretary Frank Mankiewicz (jеwish member of the ADL, responsible for directing RFK into the pantry where Sirhan Sirhan was waiting in June 1968). The movie famously covers up israel's quest for nuclear weapons & JFK's desire to stop it, his efforts to register the jеwish lobby as a foreign agent under FARA, and his promotion of UN Resolution 194 calling for Palestinian Right Of Return. Finally, while it mentions that JFK wanted to exit Vietnam, it omits that he also didn't want to pursue any extensive arms buildup for israel, denying it all offensive weapons and missiles. LBJ reversed all of those policies almost immediately after the assassination--including JFK's planned exit from Vietnam. But the movie also covers up something else through another "limited hangout": that one of the strategic purposes of the Vietnam War wasn't just to make money for the American war machine, but to also build up the war machine to be able to supply israel with the intelligence, armaments & other military capabilities sufficient to overcome its enemies. Without the intelligence, armaments & weapons America supplied to israel throughout the course of the Vietnam War (1964-1973), it's possible israel wouldn't have prevailed in the 1967 6-Day War and absolutely certain it wouldn't have survived the 1973 Yom Kippur War. And without the defense buildup of the American war industry stemming from the Vietnam War, America wouldn't have the capacity to supply israel with those necessary armaments to win. In this way, israel was the top beneficiary of the Vietnam War--just like the War On Terror! Vietnam didn't benefit. America didn't benefit. But israel did. Funny how that keeps happening. This is the other secret agenda that the "JFK" movie obscured. You ever wonder why the Vietnam War wasn't fought to be won and why it just kept pointlessly grinding on? It's because the real point was to keep the War Machine at maximum capacity for israel while the US treaded water in the war effort. Watch this "conspiracy" scene from "JFK" now and see how clever & devious their propaganda is. Note how many truths it blends in with made-up bullsh*t to go along with the glaring omissions. My favorite part is where Donald Sutherland references the crucifixion! Was this a sly tip of the hand that the jеws were behind the assassination? Or maybe it was a nod to well-known jеwish propaganda that the Romans killed Christ--similar to how they allege the CIA killed JFK? Either way, it's eyebrow-raising. The final credits scene drives it all home: it suggests Vietnam was fought for the enrichment of the Military Industrial Complex--which is partially true, but it leaves out the part where that buildup was of crucial benefit and existential necessity to israel. Notably absent from the Vietnam angle in the movie is any mention of Arthur Goldberg, the jеwish UN ambassador who defended US intervention in Vietnam on the world stage; Walt Rostow, the jеwish National Security Advisor & architect of the war; and Eugene Rostow, the jеwish Undersecretary of State who championed the Vietnam war & defended its legal basis. Nor does it mention how Eugene conceived the Warren Commission or was responsible for getting the Mossad-compromised Allen Dulles onto it. Finally, it says nothing about how virtually the entire State Department was completely taken over by zionists. The fact is, a major motive behind the Vietnam War was to help supply israel. And that fact has remain hidden until now, partially due to propaganda like this. Try not to be enraged this Memorial Day as you realize our boys died in Vietnam for jеws & israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kennedy called for budget cuts affecting military installations and overseas bases. Nearly 3,000 helicopters had been lost in Vietnam, made by Bell Helicopter, which was saved from bankruptcy by the CIA. The defense budget had increased from $10 billion in 1949 to a projected $200 billion. Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War, cooperate with the Soviets, ban nuclear testing, avoid invading Cuba, and withdraw from Vietnam. By 1961, it was known Kennedy wouldn't escalate involvement in Southeast Asia. Kennedy's stance angered some, with one person saying he fucked them in Laos and was going to fuck them in Vietnam. Kennedy questioned why the US should go into Vietnam if they wouldn't go into Cuba. Defense dollars were being targeted to voting districts. Controlling intelligence from Saigon was seen as crucial, as was controlling McNamara to influence Kennedy. The plan was initiated through conversations among defense contractors, big oil bankers, and military officers. The goal was to remove Kennedy, with a plan formulated in the fall, likely in the South. The operation was structured for plausible deniability, resembling a military firing squad where no one is directly culpable. The coup d'etat had to succeed, regardless of the cost.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And don't underestimate the budget cuts that Kennedy called for a March of '63 or either. Nearly 52 military installations in 25 states, 21 overseas bases. You're talking big money. You know how many helicopters have lost in Vietnam? Nearly 3,000 so far. Who makes that? Bell helicopter. Who owns Bell? Well, Bell was nearly bankrupt when the First National Bank of Boston approached the CIA about developing helicopter for Indochina usage. How about the f one eleven fighter? General Dynamics of Fort Worth, Texas. Who owns that? Find out the defense budget since the war began. '75 going on a hundred billion. Nearly 200,000,000,000 will be spent before it's over. In 1949, it was 10,000,000,000. No war. No money. The organizing principle of any society, mister Garrison, is for war. The authority of the state over its people resides in its war powers. And Kennedy wanted to end the Cold War in his second term. He wanted to call out the moon race in favor of cooperation with the Soviets. He signed a treaty with the Soviets to ban nuclear testing. He refused to invade Cuba in 1962, and he set out to withdraw from Vietnam. All of that ended on the twenty second November nineteen sixty three. As early as 1961, they knew Kennedy was not going to go to war in South East Asia. Like Caesar, he is surrounded by enemies and something's underway, but it has no face. Yet everybody in the loop knows. Speaker 1: You could forget about your combat troops. He told McNamara, he is gonna pull out the goddamn advisers. He fucked us in Laos, and now he is gonna fuck us in goddamn Vietnam. He won't implement it before the election. He can't afford to. I hear the NSC meeting was a real barn burner. I wouldn't have missed it for the world. Heads are gonna roll everywhere. Did you hear what Lemnitzer did? What happened? Kennedy tried to rub Lem's nose and shit, saying if we didn't go into Cuba, which is so close, why should we go into Vietnam, which is so far away? Speaker 0: Son of a bitch. Speaker 1: There he goes again. He's got his hands on the chicken switch. Anyway, Lem said that the chiefs still think we ought to go into Cuba. Speaker 0: Money's a stake. Big money. Hundred billion dollars. Kennedy brothers target voting districts for those defense dollars. They give TFX fighter contracts only to those counties that are gonna make a difference in '64 and the people in the loop. They fight back their way. Speaker 1: We have to control the intelligence from Saigon. Speaker 2: Well, just don't let McNamara start sticking his damn nose in this thing. Every time he goes over to Saigon on some fucking fact finding mission, he comes back and just scares the shit out of the president. Now I won't Max Taylor on him night and day like a fly on shit. Now you control McNamara, and you control Kennedy. Speaker 0: I think it started like that in the wind. Defense contractors, big oil bankers, just conversations, nothing more. Then a call is made, maybe to someone like my superior officer, General Wine. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're going. We need your help. Speaker 1: When? In Speaker 0: the fall, probably in the South. We want you to come up with a plan. Speaker 1: I can do that. Speaker 0: Everything is singularized. No one has said he must die. There's been no vote. Nothing's on paper. There's no one to blame. It's as old as the crucifixion, a military firing squad. Five bullets, one blank. No one's guilty because everyone on the power structure knows anything has a plausible deniability. There are no compromising connections except at the most secret point. But what's paramount is that it must succeed no matter how many die, no matter how much it costs, the perpetrators must be on the winning side and never subject to prosecution for anything by anyone. That is a coup d'etat.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

VIETNAM PLOT CONTINUED: Eugene Rostow Exposed Today, I will show you more connections to the Vietnam War as a jеwish plot, and show how it links to the JFK assassination. Our subject: Eugene Rostow. Less than 2 days after the JFK assassination, Eugene Rostow--Russian jеw, Dean https://t.co/ru758CoHde

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the assassination of President Kennedy. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the supreme court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America as a land of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and a joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the president along these lines. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Telephone conversation between Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow on 11/24/1963. Time unknown. Speaker 1: Talk to you. Thank you, boy. I'm if I can help in any way, I will. I'm calling with a suggestion. I've just talked to Nick Katzenbach. Yes. And the poor fellow, he has so much of a burden on him. Yes. Talked to him about three times today. And he just sounded so groggy that I thought I'd pass this thought along to you. And, of course, I realize how tough it must be now for the president. In this situation with this bastard killed, my suggestion is that a presidential commission be appointed a very distinguished citizen in the very near future, bipartisan and above politics. No Supreme Court justices, but people like Tom Dewey and, know, Bill Story from Texas. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: So on. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: A commission of seven or nine people, maybe Nixon, I don't know Right. To look into the whole affair of the murder of the president. Mhmm. Because world opinion and American opinion is just now so shaken by the behavior of the Dallas police that they're not believing anything. Speaker 0: That's I can understand that. Speaker 1: Now I've got a party here. We've I've been pursuing the the policy, you know, that people need to come together at this time. Speaker 0: You know what you could do that would be very helpful? And this is a this is a good suggestion, and I'll pass it on just a minute. The president's calling. Speaker 1: Hello? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Speaker 0: Excuse me. Go ahead. Sure, Bill. Speaker 1: What can I do to go help? Speaker 0: Well, was just thinking coming in a few minutes ago after hearing the news of Hawesville shooting that this is symptomatic of what has been happening into this country in the last few years and the breakdown of respect for law and order, know, that the the signs impeach the supreme court, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. If I could have a memorandum to give to the president along these lines, if one of his great tasks is to help, you know, continue the institutions that seem to be, at least, if not in doubt right now, at least, weakened by some kind of sickness that has taken hold of some parts of our population. I'd like him to to to to have that to consider in in some private talks he's having with newsmen and with perhaps for his joint session next Wednesday night. He needs to make some point, you know, that America is known as a land of public order, a land of civility, a land of in which the public safety is guaranteed. And there's a very serious question right now in the mind of the world about these institutions that undergird us so tremendously. Speaker 1: His Gettysburg speech last spring was just terrific. It hasn't been better. Yes. I'll be glad to send any memo right away. Speaker 0: Alright. Now your suggestion is that he appoint a special commission of distinguished Americans, primarily in the field of law, I presume, to look into the whole question of the assassination. Speaker 1: That's right. Alright. Report on it. Speaker 0: Alright. I'll get that to him also. I wish you would keep me informed about how Nick is is doing. We don't wanna put any greater strain on him than is necessary. But Speaker 1: Well, he's a great man. Utmost faith in him. Yes. He's he's fighting back. Alright. Terrific strength. Speaker 0: Thanks for calling. I'll I'll follow through. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: Goodbye.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

7/ @TruthArchiveAI save this

Saved - July 7, 2025 at 3:59 AM

@TheRedactedInc - Redacted

Everything you were taught about “McCarthyism” is a lie. 🧨 We break down the smear campaign, the cover-up, and the once-classified Venona files that proved he was right. https://t.co/itnnkPsuUc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that everything taught about McCarthyism is wrong and that Joseph McCarthy was right about communist infiltration of the U.S. government. This is supported by the Venona files, which revealed Soviet communications confirming that many Americans, including high-ranking officials like Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White, were working for Soviet intelligence. The speaker argues that McCarthy did not want to "name names" publicly but was pressured by Democrats to do so. The speaker claims that the term "McCarthyism" and the narrative surrounding McCarthy were propaganda created by Democrats and the State Department to smear him. Senator Millard Tydings and the State Department colluded to discredit McCarthy, using tactics like threatening to play a non-existent recording of a speech. McCarthy obtained his information from a State Department memo flagging over 120 employees as security risks, which has since disappeared from public record. The speaker refutes claims that McCarthy was un-American, created the Hollywood blacklist, or was antisemitic. The speaker suggests that the term "McCarthyism" is used to discredit whistleblowers and protect historical allies of the left.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything you were taught about McCarthyism is wrong, and so is the phrase naming names in front of a senate. What you think it means is outing people out of hate and hysteria. But here's an inconvenient truth. Joseph McCarthy was right. And what's more, when you're using the term McCarthyism or naming names, you are using government created propaganda. It's a lie, and this propaganda was created by the Democrats and the State Department. So here I am to clear his name and tell you the absolute truth about that word and the story of McCarthy. If you ask any high school student what it means, likely they'll say, well, it's baseless witch hunts that ruined innocent lives. This is a staple of American high school curriculum right up there with the Red Scare, the crucible. It's always framed as this cautionary tale about paranoia, not proof. Well, textbooks paint McCarthy as this reckless bully who whipped up blacklist in Hollywood and torched careers and did it all out of antisemitic malice, but I'm going to myth bust that. So hold on to your hats. Here are some things that we are not told about McCarthy. Number one is that he was right, and I'm gonna tell you how we know this. He actually did not want to name names. He was smeared by the democrats and the state department in collusion. He actually had factual reports and intelligence on which to make his accusations, and he was the victim of multiple character smears, all of which I'm gonna tell you the truth about. So let's start with the first one. Get ready. Buckle up. First of all, he was right. History has shown that McCarthy was absolutely correct, and there were, in fact, communists infiltrating The US Government, specifically the state department at the policy level at the highest levels. Well, how do we know this? Well, the FBI knew it all along, but the public knows because when the Soviet Union fell in the nineties, they gave us proof. This proof is called the Venona decrypts or the Venona files. It is a trove of interceptive Soviet communist communications that The US intelligence had been decoding for years, in fact, for decades. The Venona files revealed that hundreds of Americans were secretly working with or for the Soviet intelligence, many of them inside the US government, including the state department, the treasury, and even the White House. Here are some names that were confirmed in the VENONA files. Alger Hiss, a top state department official who helped create the United Nations, Harry Dexter White, assistant secretary of the US treasury under FDR, Lachlan Lurie, an adviser to president Roosevelt, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg who passed atomic secrets to Moscow, one of the more famous cases. Now the only one here directly named by McCarthy on this list was Harry Dexter White. He was named in the famous nineteen fifties Wheeling speech. He died of a heart attack just a few days after denying under oath that he was a Soviet agent, but that was a lie. He is in fact confirmed in the Vedona files as a confirmed Soviet source. The others here, Alger Hiss was exposed by Whitaker Chambers, not McCarthy. Lachlan Lurie was part of a broader network of espionage that McCarthy did reference, but he was not specifically focused on him. The Rosenbergs were prosecuted by the justice department, not McCarthy. So I should be clear. But all of these validate McCarthy's assertion that there were Soviet spies in the US government. Now I should point out the FBI knew this all along. The FBI had the Vannona transcripts as well as treasure troves of documents, files and files and files. And in fact, we know that they knew this as early as 1942 because they were investigating Oppenheimer, the father of the atomic bomb. We know this, that he had been investigated as a secret party member. Now why you might ask, did McCarthy stand on a limb by himself if the FBI knew that what he was saying was correct? Well, partly because the intel that they had was classified. They were still working these files at the time. And partly because they didn't think that McCarthy would need their help. McCarthy wasn't actually doing these investigations himself. He was asking for investigations, which were in fact happening, And they there was no way that the FBI at the time could have known that the democrats were going to attempt to smear McCarthy, which at the time was so unprecedented, and I'm gonna show you this. But it is true that by 1950, when the McCarthy hearings began, the president and the state department had already been given volumes of information proving that Russian spies were working in the state department, and they did nothing about it, which is another broader question. Why did that happen? This brings me to my point about McCarthy not wanting to name names. This is my second point. Now, the narrative is that he named names before the senate. But in fact, the truth is that when he was called in for these hearings, he had barely began his presentation when democratic senator Scott Lucas demanded that he name names. So McCarthy came prepared with these accusations as only file numbers, anonymous file numbers, case one, case two, so on. He had said repeatedly that he was not prepared to name names publicly in for in front of the TV cameras, but the democrats pushed him. Here's when he first began his speech, and, senator Lucas said, I want him to name those communists. The senator is privileged to name them all in the senate. And if those people are not communist, the senator will be protected. He said, all the communists he's gonna name, I want to remain here until he names them. So there are many exchanges like this where democrats push and push and push, and McCarthy repeatedly refuses to name names. He says, I will hand these names over in closed door sessions. That is on the record many times. Here's just one of those times where he says, these this is a quote from McCarthy, which you will not find if you look it up on YouTube, but it is in the record. He says the names are available. The senators may have them if they care for them. I think, however, it would be improper to make the names public until the appropriate senate committee can meet in executive sessions and get them. I have approximately 81 cases. I do not claim to have any tremendous investigative agency to get the facts, but if I were to give all the names involved, it might leave the wrong impression. If we should label one man a communist when he is not a communist, I think it would be too bad. However, the names are here. I should be glad to abide by the decision of the senate after it hears the cases. But I think the sensible thing to do would be to have an executive session and have a proper committee go over the whole situation. He didn't want to. We have many exchanges like this where he says over and over, I do not want to do this. And he never claimed to have conducted investigation himself. He was a senator, not a prosecutor. His aim at showing up for these hearings at all was to ask the justice department and the state department to investigate these things. But once he named names, most of the accused were brought to testify. They denied everything and were promptly cleared by the Democratic controlled committee often without further inquiry. Many were never seriously investigated at all. In fact, some just walked free on nothing more than a denial despite credible questions about their records. So this idea that McCarthy named names, that's a smear. He that was a trap that he walked into. He resisted doing so many times. It was the democrats who demanded that he name names publicly, pressuring him under the guise of transparency, and then turning around and weaponizing that disclosure against them. So they laid the trap. He walked into it. So how many innocent people were dragged into this? We can't really know since so many of them just asserted their innocence and then walked away. The system clearly wasn't interested in the truth. They were interested in discrediting McCarthy. And there is evidence that that is what happened. And I move on to this next myth. We're all feeling it. Costs are still rising. Inflation is slowing, but still a thing. Prices are still going up. So you think, well, should I call American Financing to refinance and pay off this credit card debt that I'm living off of? But then you second guess yourself because the low mortgage rate that you have. But obviously, when you evaluate your debt, if you're paying super high interest in one place and low interest in another, you're never gonna build yourself out of debt and into financial freedom. The math doesn't work out. Let American Financing show you that with their tools that will teach you this product that wealthy people do all the time, which is leverage assets and build instead of continuing to dig into the red. Because, again, if you're only making minimum payments on that bad debt, you're not going anywhere. You're basically treading water. So you owe it to your family to learn this trick and see what's possible. There's no upfront fees, no pressure. They're just gonna teach you this. Call them at (866) 890-8434. Again, that's (866) 890-8434 or head on over to americanfinancing.net/redacted. Commit to spending the time to studying this, see if it works for your family, and then you can build wealth. Again, 8668908434 or head on over to americanfinancing.net/redacted. The smear campaign was run very intentionally by this man here, Millard Tidings. He was a democratic senator from Maryland. He threatened to play a speech that McCarthy had made in West Virginia at the hearings, but it was pure theater. There was never a recording of that speech. It was mysteriously erased. Tidings colluded with the state department. He later admitting admitted under congressional testimony that he didn't even have that speech. He was just threatening it for the cameras. Now Tidings colluded with the state department to smear McCarthy in these hearings, and there is proof of that. In fact, the magazine Newsweek covered this smear campaign extensively in 1950. Although the archives are nearly impossible to find online, they exist. Tidings convened meetings with the state department's own lawyers with the aim of, according to Newsweek, the total and eternal destruction of McCarthy. Now let that sink in for a second. The state department was allowed to interfere in an investigation of itself helping Democrats engineer a smear campaign against the one man who was calling for accountability publicly. And that's then where we get the term McCarthyism. They came up with it. So how can we use this when it is like the term conspiracy theory was used to discredit those asking questions? Conspiracy theory itself is a conspiracy, so is McCarthyism. So let's move on. Where did McCarthy actually get his in information if not from the FBI? Well, from the US State Department itself. In August of nineteen forty six, a State Department official named Samuel Klaus wrote a classified 106 page memo flagging over 120 US employees as security risks. This internal document directly informed Truman's 1947 loyalty program and later McCarthy's 1950 speeches. Now here's something odd about that memo though. It has since disappeared from public record. The author of this fantastic book called Blacklisted by History, which is a fantastic read. It almost reads like a spy novel, but it's real. Creation of American Propaganda. M Stanton Evans, he went looking for it and the Claus memo is missing from public record. He looked in the National Archives. He looked in the Tidings Panel Archives. He found a notice of where the memo had been, but it was withdrawn in 1993. So this important information, this important document that informed the McCarthy hearings is gone. That's weird. Right? But McCarthy definitely read it, and that is what prompted him to act, speak publicly about the need for investigation in communist infiltration into the US government. As a senator, that's kind of what you would hope they would do. See weird things, call for government investigation. It is also useful though that Democrats went on to smear his character. And here are just a few things that they use to smear his name, are not true. The first thing, they called him un American. Well, you be the judge of that. I would like you to know about his background. He was one of seven children from a hardworking family in Wisconsin, and he had to work several jobs as a teenager. So he did not get to complete high school at age 18 when normal teenagers do. So at the age of 20, he enrolled in an accelerated course to finish high school, and he finished in nine months. He went on to get a law degree, and then he ran for office as a local judge, and he won, becoming the youngest judge in Wisconsin at that time, 1939. Then came the draft, which he would have been exempt from because he was a sitting judge, but he gave up his position and enlisted voluntarily anyway. He joined the marines in World War two. He flew combat missions in The Pacific and earned the distinguished flying cross. When he came home, he was easily elected as senator earning himself the title of youngest senator in the country at the age of 38. So, again, if you would like to call him un American, well, you be the judge. Someone who volunteers to go to war when there's a draft. Is that un American? Another character smear is that he created this Hollywood blacklist where actors and producers couldn't get any roles or any work because they were suspected communists. The fact is McCarthy had nothing to do with that. It was Hollywood executives that did that themselves. The blacklist began in 1947 under what's called HUAC, the House Un American Activities Committee, and it was enforced by studio executives themselves years before McCarthy ever had a single senate hearing. So that doesn't hold up. And often you might hear him called an anti Semite. These assertions came about because most of the communist spies were in fact Jewish, but he did not specifically target Jews. And in fact, he didn't even come up with the list himself. The State Department did. So the fact that they happened to be Jewish had nothing to do with his intentions. He was looking for Russian communists. And in fact, McCarthy's chief counsel, Roy Cohn, was a Jew who helped root out these communists. There's no record of McCarthy ever specifically going after Jews or making any antisemitic statements, that label stuck because it was useful, not fact based. So given these facts, why do you think we still use the term McCarthyism, and who does? Well, I think you might know that McCarthyism is mostly used by the left because many of the individuals that were in fact caught in pro Soviet networks were intellectuals, artists, and bureaucrats aligned with the left. So labeling this scrutiny as McCarthyism helps protect historical allies, discredit whistleblowers, and preserve the moral authority of progressive institutions. Also, attacking the source and not the actual evidence presented has become a useful tactic now used in senate hearings by both sides, we should be clear, the right and the left. When they don't wanna hear something that's presented to congressional meetings, they go after the person presenting it. That's not new now, but it was new back then. And in fact, democrats went after him so completely that when the summary of the hearings were published after the McCarthy hearings wrapped up, not only did Democrats mysteriously leave out dozens of pages, which included Republicans' objections to many of the committee's conclusions, they also had this summary of what happened, which used extreme language to frame the hearings as this hit on McCarthy, which at the time was very unusual. Evans says that this memo had these scathing accusations of McCarthy himself, hoax, fraud, deception, nefarious, vile, big lie, distortion, half truth, untruth, despicable, biased, sinister, totalitarianism, you might find this recognizable in the way that current politicians use the term misinformation. At the time, this was nascent, that committees did not just smear other members in order to push aside something they didn't wanna see. And sadly, now this is a common tactic, probably because it worked so well. It proves that the main purpose of the McCarthy hearings was only to smear McCarthy, not get to the truth, which now is incontrovertible that the US government was actually infiltrated. Anti communist efforts were not just hysterical. They were founded, and McCarthy had legitimate targets. And, again, it wasn't the people himself that he was after. He wanted the government to launch investigations. He wanted to keep the people's names out of it. But now, sadly, when politicians use the term McCarthyism, they just sling around propagate propaganda. This was government propaganda, turning the accuser into the accused. And they have invoked McCarthyism as a warning sign against state overreach, which obviously is valid in most contexts, but they ignore the real subversion that did exist. And it's such a useful lie. It lets those in power rerate history, discredit investigations, and brand their opponents as paranoid fanatics. And even when these opponents are pointing to documented truth. So if we're serious about learning about history, we owe it to ourselves to separate myth from fact and call propaganda by its name. So we shouldn't use these terms, McCarthyism, naming names, even conspiracy theorists. These are things that the government does to subvert our curiosity, and we should reject it. And perhaps we even instead of McCarthyism, we should use this. Miller Tidings was the guy who started it. We could use tidyism. Tidyingism. I just made that up. I don't know if that works. Is you're trying to subvert real questions. Tidyingism. I don't know. You wanna use that? Let's let's start. Start a hashtag. So let me know what you think of this. This is true. This is I'm trying to myth bust right now government propaganda. Let me know what you think. Were you taught this in high school? I bet you weren't. And the next time someone accuses you of McCarthyism, you can say thank you because that guy was right.
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 9:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yesterday, I discussed Bill Buckley and his role in shaping modern Conservatism. Today, I focus on Rush Limbaugh, who had a massive influence on the Right with his 50 million weekly listeners. He admired Buckley and often praised Israel as America's ally, defending it against criticism. Interestingly, he shared a lawyer with Jeffrey Epstein, raising questions about his 1993 trip to Israel. I wonder how many truths about Israel were obscured by Limbaugh's influence. There's a pattern of gatekeepers like him and Tucker Carlson restraining the Radical Right from confronting deeper issues.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Yesterday, I told you about Bill Buckley and how he was an intelligence operative who promoted modern Conservativism & helped restrain the radical elements on the Right. Today, I bring you Rush Limbaugh. At his peak, Rush had an audience of 50 million weekly listeners. For 33 years on the radio he was perhaps the greatest champion of conservatism in the country. He helped launch the entire "Right-wing talk radio phenomenon." Guys like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Dennis Prager and Mark Levin owe a great debt to him. He wrote books, published a newsletter and even had a television show. Always championing "Conservatism." But in all those years, he barely spoke of jews & certainly never called out jewish power or jewish supremacy. Little known fact, in 1993, Limbaugh made the trip to israel, visited the holo caust museum with Benjamin Netanyahu, and touched the wall. jews credit him with helping mainstream support for israel within the conservative movement. Sometimes I wonder what else happened on that 5-day tour that was never reported? Especially since it was in the era where no one was aware of the Epstein-style blackmail operations israel was engaged in.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Rush was a great admirer of Bill Buckley, appearing on "Firing Line" himself in 1992. But Rush often referenced Buckley and presented his content to the listening audience. When Buckley died in 2008, Limbaugh did a special monologue praising him and reviewing his accomplishment for the conservative movement.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Limbaugh praised israel as our lone ally in the Middle East. He supported israel's military actions and advocated for israel to be "unleashed." Rush's producer of 25 years recalled an occasion when a caller blamed israel for 9-11 and the wars in the Middle East, that Rush called him a racist bigot and told him to "shut up." How many millions of Americans were kept from the truth about israel--and are still kept from it--because of the efforts of Rush Limbaugh?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Revisiting that 5-day israel trip question I had: Rush Limbaugh and Jeffrey Epstein shared the same lawyer--Roy Black--who was also the lawyer for Justin Bieber, and Joe Francis--the "Girls Gone Wild" pornographer of teenage girls who was convicted of child abuse. 🧐🤔 https://t.co/qLilZvbdb2

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ For decades, it seems as if gatekeepers have been boosted to restrain the more "radical Right," keeping them from becoming antisemitic & forming true opposition to jewish supremacy. Guys like Tucker Carlson, Bill Buckley & maybe even Rush Limbaugh: https://t.co/oohBoL5BX7

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

A lot of the emerging Populist Right continues to embrace Tucker Carlson, even in the face of the overwhelming evidence that he is a Fed running a containment operation on the Radical Right. It mirrors the Conservative Right's long-term embrace of William Buckley, who was also a Fed, guiding and containing the Radical Right of yesteryear. Obviously, Tucker is likeable. Would he be effective if he weren't? We have to start waking up to our situation and reject these operations. We need to be more sophisticated. The intel operations being run on us are extremely sophisticated. "Tucker is waking people up!" Yeah, just like William Buckley woke America up. Lol. Stop coping. Tucker isn't our guy and he's not leading the Radical Right anywhere that's going to get us our country back.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@SkookumchuckKid Yep. Their opposition to communism was just too unsightly. Lol

Saved - September 17, 2025 at 7:12 PM

@DanBilzerian - Dan Bilzerian

Nixon knew https://t.co/LCmkCHfMgd

Video Transcript AI Summary
文本反复强调“都是一个人的人”的概念,并提出“我们的人人是否属于同一个人”的疑问,聚焦个体与集合的关系。 The text repeatedly emphasizes the idea that 'everyone is a person' and raises the question of whether 'our people' belong to the same single person, focusing on the relationship between individuals and the collective. The looping phrasing contrasts being a single person with the notion that 'our people' are not one person, suggesting a tension between individuality and group identity. Through its pattern of repetition, the piece examines how personal identity intersects with shared or communal identity, and whether a group tied to an individual can be seen as one person or as multiple distinct persons. The repetition creates a rhythm that invites readers to reflect on the boundaries between self and others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 都 是 一 个 人 的 人 都 是 在 这 个 人 的 人 都 是 一 个 人 的 人 都 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 但 是 我 们 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 但 是 我 们 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 但 是 我 们 的 人 的 人
View Full Interactive Feed