reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - March 12, 2023 at 2:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Stanford has faced a series of controversies in recent years. Its IT department banned words, including "American," and the university threatened to withhold degrees from students who didn't take booster shots. The CS department denounced Kyle Rittenhouse but encouraged students to read the memoir of a black nationalist terrorist. The university is also cutting white student enrollment. The president is accused of falsifying research data, and there have been numerous student suicides. Stanford is being run like a clown show.

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

If you thought the DEI law dean exploding in front of a federal appellate judge was bad, I have some news… Stanford is a fallen institution. It has gone insane since 2020. Here are the most ridiculous stories from the past few years, some of which I documented. Thread:

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

Stanford’s IT department created a list of banned words and initiated purges of university websites (they didn’t finish) It included the word “American” https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-stanford-guide-to-acceptable-words-elimination-of-harmful-language-initiative-11671489552

Opinion | The Stanford Guide to Acceptable Words Behold the school’s Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative. wsj.com

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

September 2021: the Stanford campus opens for the first time since the pandemic began. Students wore masks on bicycles at twice the rate they wore helmets! By yours truly https://stanfordreview.org/stanford-bicycles-helmets-masks/

Review Analysis: Stanford students are more likely to wear masks on bicycles than helmets In April of this year, I witnessed something on the Stanford campus that will be seared into my memory forever: a student on a bicycle, wearing flip-flops, AirPods in ear, going the wrong way through a roundabout in an active construction zone, with no helmet. But like any good follower stanfordreview.org

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

Dec 2021: when Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted, the Stanford CS department denounced him. That same department encourages students to read the memoir of black nationalist terrorist Assata Shakur. https://stanfordreview.org/stanford-cs-goes-woke/

Stanford CS Goes Woke: department slams Rittenhouse, praises Ibram Kendi, and promotes terrorist autobiography! The Department of Computer Science is the crown jewel of Stanford. It minted trillions in Silicon Valley wealth, engineered large parts of the internet, and continues to be a powerhouse for the tech industry and American capitalism. It’s also the largest undergraduate department. But today, Stanford CS has fallen stanfordreview.org

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

2022: Stanford threatens to withhold my completed degree from me because I didn’t take a “booster” shot. No more academic requirements for graduation; just pharmaceutical requirements. https://maxmeyer.substack.com/p/how-i-almost-didnt-graduate-from

How I Almost Didn't Graduate From Stanford A tale of bureaucracy and "booster noncompliance" maxmeyer.substack.com

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

STANFORD’S WAR ON SOCIAL LIFE By @ginevlily, who ignited a revolution. You MUST read this peace https://www.palladiummag.com/2022/06/13/stanfords-war-on-social-life/

Stanford’s War on Social Life palladiummag.com

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

June 2022: a Stanford medical professor tried to have me expelled for making fun of masks. Authoritarian campus. https://maxmeyer.substack.com/p/a-former-biden-covid-19-official

A Former Biden COVID-19 Official Tried to Get Me Expelled from Stanford for an Anti-Mask Tweet Yes, really. maxmeyer.substack.com

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

2021: it turns out that star professor Jo Boaler, an advocate of woke math education, is also a fraudster and a scammer. She wrote the California math framework that axes calculus. https://stanfordreview.org/review-investigation-jo-boaler-is-worse-than-we-thought/

Review Investigation: Jo Boaler, Cathy Williams, and the Woke Math Scam It’s been a busy few years for Jo Boaler, star professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education. Last year, the California Mathematics Framework — of which she is a primary author — ignited outrage due to its low-standards and equity-obsessed approach to math education (including axing calculus and describing homework stanfordreview.org

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

2020: the craven faculty senate votes to condemn Dr. Scott Atlas, who was totally vindicated. The treatment of @DrJBhattacharya was unspeakable as well. https://news.stanford.edu/2020/11/20/faculty-senate-condemns-actions-hoover-fellow-scott-atlas/

Faculty Senate condemns COVID-19 actions of Hoover’s Scott Atlas | Stanford News In its last meeting of the autumn quarter, the Stanford Faculty Senate condemned the COVID-19-related actions of Hoover senior fellow and presidential adviser Scott Atlas. The Faculty Senate also approved a new policy on Open Access to make scholarly works more widely available. news.stanford.edu

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

2023: Stanford is aggressively cutting the enrollment of white students. One last hurrah before the end of affirmative action https://stanfordreview.org/stanfords-racial-engineering/

Stanford’s Racial Engineering Stanford’s enrollment rate for white students in the Class of 2026 was 22%, a drop from 40% for the Class of 2016 just ten years ago. While Stanford claims that “the University does not use quotas of any kind in its admission process,” a further exploration of Stanford’s stanfordreview.org

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

Now: scandal currently embroiling Stanford’s president, who is accused of falsifying research data when he was a pharmaceutical scientist and executive. https://stanforddaily.com/2023/02/17/internal-review-found-falsified-data-in-stanford-presidents-alzheimers-research-colleagues-allege/

Review found ‘falsified data’ in Stanford President’s research, colleagues allege His paper was called “the miracle result.” But it never turned into an Alzheimer’s treatment. Now, four former Genentech senior scientists and executives allege that an internal review in 2011 discovered the paper had been based on fabricated research — and that Marc Tessier-Lavigne kept the results of the review from becoming public. He denies the allegations. stanforddaily.com

@mualphaxi - Maxwell Meyer

Finally: you must read the reporting of @StockJabber about the last decade in Stanford. Unbelievable numbers of student suicides and other misconduct. The university is being run like a clown show. https://theymustresign.substack.com/p/stanfords-president-and-provost-must

Stanford’s President and Provost Must Resign Twelve Student Deaths, Corruption, Coverups, Lying to WSCUC Regulators, and Lawsuits theymustresign.substack.com
Saved - March 26, 2023 at 1:56 AM

@ScottAdamsSays - Scott Adams

What is the biggest source of racism in 2023?

@TheRabbitHole84 - The Rabbit Hole

@ScottAdamsSays Affirmative action. We have allowed systemic racism to exist under the guise of progress for far too long.

Saved - June 16, 2023 at 4:22 PM

@MythinformedMKE - Mythinformed

The dimwits that evaluate DEI statements decide who is a good mathematician in CA. @ConceptualJames and @jordanbpeterson on the DEI capture of STEM in California.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 75% of new applicants to STEM positions at the University of California State Systems have their applications ignored due to insufficient DEI statements. This alarming statistic highlights the replacement of years of hard work and expertise with a simple statement. The evaluation of these statements is left to individuals who may not possess the necessary qualifications. The suggestion of using chat TPT to automate the writing process is met with skepticism and humor. Overall, this situation is seen as a concerning and unfortunate development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is happening. Now look look at our medical journals. Oh, yeah. Well, they say 75%. This is so horrible. 75% of new applicants to STEM positions at the University of California State Systems have their applications, their research dossiers are unread because the DEI statements aren't sufficient. 75%. That's an astonishing number. It is something it is something to behold, Troy would smile down on this. That's for sure. That's for sure. Talk about a coup. So that you can replace those decades of work that it takes to become, say, a PhD in something difficult like mathematics. And you can reduce that to a DEI statement. And then you can let the dimwits who evaluate DEI statements decide which mathematicians get to practice math. That's right. It's like, oh my god. And now the DEI statement will be written by chat Yeah. Right. Trick everybody. Right. Right. Right. Well, maybe we maybe you technical types have come up with a solution to the DEI problem. Yeah. Just get chat TPT to write the statements. Yeah. We're lucky to do it. You've automated you've automated the compliance process. Oh, yeah. That's pretty damn funny. Yeah. You know, horrible, horrible way.
Saved - June 29, 2023 at 2:55 PM

@nytimes - The New York Times

Breaking News: The Supreme Court rejected affirmative action at Harvard and UNC. The major ruling curtails race-conscious college admissions in the U.S., all but ensuring that elite institutions become whiter and more Asian and less Black and Latino. https://nyti.ms/4347Xrx https://nyti.ms/4347Xrx

Affirmative Action: Supreme Court Strikes Down Race-Based Admissions at Harvard and U.N.C. In disavowing race as a factor in achieving educational diversity, the court all but ensured that the student population at the campuses of elite institutions will become whiter and more Asian and less Black and Latino. nytimes.com
Saved - June 29, 2023 at 2:31 PM

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

Just In: the Supreme Court has rules that race based admissions violates the 14th amendment. This deals a major blow to affirmative action. The case started in 2014 when students from Harvard and UNC were rejected based on race. The schools won in federal court, but the SCOTUS dealt them a major blow today. What will schools do without being able to be racist against whites and Asians?

Saved - June 30, 2023 at 6:01 AM

@realchrisrufo - Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

EXCLUSIVE: Berkeley Law School dean Erwin Chemerinsky explains how he has secretly enacted a policy of racial discrimination in faculty hiring—which is illegal in California. "If I'm ever deposed, I'm going to deny I said this to you."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of unstated affirmative action, where colleges or universities prioritize diversity without publicly acknowledging it. They give an example from their law school, emphasizing the importance of diversity during faculty hiring. However, they caution against explicitly stating that a candidate should be preferred for diversity reasons during committee meetings. While this approach is easier to implement for faculty hiring, it becomes more challenging for student admissions due to statistical measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I mean by unstated affirmative action is what if the college or university doesn't tell anybody, doesn't make any public statements But so on. I'll give you an example from our law school. But if ever I'm deposed, I'm gonna deny I said this to you. When we do faculty hiring, we're quite conscious that diversity is important to us. And we say diversity is important. It's fine to say that. But I'm very careful when we have a faculty appointments committee meeting. Anytime somebody says, you know, we should really prefer this candidate or this candidate because this person would add diversity, don't say that. You can think it. You can vote it, but our discussions are not privileged, so don't ever articulate that that's what you're doing. Well, that works more easily with regard to faculty hiring. With regard to student admissions, it becomes more difficult because of statistical measure.
Saved - August 2, 2023 at 2:41 AM

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Columbia Law School said it would require all applicants to submit "video statements" in the wake of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling—to evaluate students’ “personal strengths,” of course. They backtracked within hours of me contacting them.

Columbia Law School Said It Would Require Applicants To Submit ‘Video Statements’ In Wake Of Affirmative Action Ban. Then it Backtracked. Columbia Law School said on its website that it would require all applicants to submit a 90-second "video statement" in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ban on race-based college admissions. freebeacon.com
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 7:37 AM

@iamyesyouareno - iamyesyouareno

This young man absolutely destroyed the interviewer about diversity. WATCH:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Enoch Powell's views on diversity and cultural changes are discussed. The speaker believes that some cities, like certain boroughs in London, have become less diverse as one culture has replaced another. They argue that this change has led to the replacement of old institutions, beliefs, and ideologies with new ones. However, the speaker acknowledges that being British does not mean being limited to a specific culture or religion. They emphasize that diversity is neither inherently good nor bad, but the exchange of cultures and world views can create a more interesting and dynamic society. The speaker questions whether it is necessary to mix an archetypal brilliant world view with other world views.
Full Transcript
What do you think, Enoch Powell? Enoch Powell's obviously a very divisive figure. What do you think of him though? Personally, what I think of him is a lot of stuff he was saying, although very divisive at the time, has come to pass. Some cities are no longer diverse. They are no longer diverse in the sense that there isn't a mix of cultures, where it's now been completely replaced by one culture over another. Like where? A lot of boroughs of London, where the white working classes have been moved out in exchange for a lot of people from other... What do you mean they've been moved out? Well, a lot of the council space in central London now, in some of those boroughs, have been completely demographically changed to a completely alien culture to what it would have been 50 years ago. But what do you mean an alien culture? I mean, in East London, it used to be very Jewish, and now it's more Muslim, but that's always been the case. So that's a very alien culture to what it was then, isn't it? I mean, they're British Muslims. Yes, but it's an alien culture. It's a different culture. Alien culture means... Alien as in unfamiliar. Yeah, but it's not alien to being British. Being British means that you can be Muslim, or Jewish, or Hindu. I'm not saying it's to being British. I'm saying it's to the culture of the area, to the beliefs and belief structures of the area, to the institutions that once were there, being replaced by new institutions now, and new beliefs, and new ideologies, and new cultures, and new religions. Well, they're different religions, of course. Completely changing it. Yeah, I mean... But a religion is an entire cultural and ideological outlook on the world. There are still white, working-class people who live there who go to school with people from different backgrounds, and they mix with people from different backgrounds. They're not monocultures. You still have white, working-class people in Tower Hamlets. I'm talking about whether or not the native people in those areas feel that they are now in their homeland, or if their homeland confronts them with something other, something which distracts them from what they believe themselves to be. Well, I think millions of people are actually happy with being diverse. I mean, London has huge numbers of mixed relationships, where people from different cultures quite literally set families up together. I mean, that's a good thing, surely. I'm not saying it's good or bad. It's neither here nor there. Diversity is not inherently good. It's not inherently bad. That's not my point. Well, I think it's inherently good, but... Why do you think that? Because I think you get an interesting exchange of cultures and world views, and that makes for a more interesting and dynamic society. Because a mix of cultures and world views provides something good, necessarily. Because we learn from each other. Yes, but let's say there's some archetypal brilliant world view, the best possible world view, right? Would you then say, oh, let's make it more diverse and mix it with other world views? No.
Saved - November 10, 2023 at 11:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The House Judiciary Committee exposed the collaboration between the Department of Homeland Security and Stanford University's "disinformation group" during the 2020 election. Named the "Election Integrity Partnership," this alliance aimed to control and suppress unfavorable news, favoring Joe Biden. This highlights the Left's influence on academia, government, and Big Tech, undermining a free media. Stanford University's decline is evident through various controversies, including anti-Semitic incidents, fear among Jewish students, and scandals involving faculty members. This article warns about the growing power of Silicon Valley, Stanford University, and Bay Area politicians in stifling freedom of expression.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Stanford/Silicon Valley/Leftwing Politics Intersectionality The House Judiciary Committee just revealed how the Department of Homeland Security worked with Stanford University to form a “disinformation group.” Their agenda was to monitor and suppress unwelcome news during the 2020 election cycle. This so-called “Election Integrity Partnership”—how ironic a name—partnered with Stanford’s Internet Observatory to prep the election news cycle for Joe Biden. Takeaways: More evidence that the Left has perverted academia, government bureaucracies, and Big Tech to sabotage a free media. And still more evidence that a once great Stanford University continues in free fall—after the Stanford lecturer Ameer Hasan Loggins’s in-class, anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students; the four-day hiatus before the university could condemn the Hamas massacre; the climate of fear for Jewish students on campus; the Stanford Law School/Judge Duncan fiasco; the recent leveraged resignation of president Marc Tessier-Lavigne; the Bankman-Fried Stanford law professors’ connections to their convicted felon son’s cash transfers from his historic Ponzi scheme; the Theranos debacle; and the “Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative” embarrassment, etc. Six months ago I wrote a warning about the increasing power of the Bay Area triad of Silicon Valley, Stanford University, and Bay Area politicians—and cited their efforts to undermine freedom of expression. https://newcriterion.com/issues/2023/5/silicon-valleys-moral-bankruptcy

Silicon Valley’s moral bankruptcy by Victor Davis Hanson Victor Davis Hanson on the pestilence in northern California. newcriterion.com
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 9:44 PM

@eyeslasho - i/o

Story of two college applicants. White teen with highest possible ACT score, and 4.4 GPA. Black kid with ACT score in 85th percentile. With affirmative action gone, black kid sad that he might not have a shot at Harvard. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/interactive/2023/affirmative-action-race-teen-college-applications/

After affirmative action, a White teen’s Ivy hopes rose. A Black teen’s sank. Cole Clemmons aimed higher. Demar Goodman aimed lower. They both wrestled with relief, guilt and inadequacy after the Supreme Court remade college admissions. washingtonpost.com
Saved - January 29, 2024 at 9:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FAA allegedly provided secret code words to members of the Black Caucus of Federal Aviation Employees, allowing them to bypass the usual hiring process. Another code word involved mentioning science as the subject with the lowest grades. These codes supposedly granted preferential treatment.

@Austen - Austen

This is one of the craziest things I’ve ever read. First, the FAA gave secret code words to students in the Black Caucus of Federal Aviation Employees to put in their resume that would skip them to the front of the line. In another instance of the signals to go to the front of the line was to say the high school class you received your lowest grades in was “Science.” Yes, they literally shot you to the front of the line if you said your worst grades were in Science.

Saved - February 26, 2024 at 1:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have ordered 3 Missouri school districts to stop discriminatory practices based on reports of religious and race-based discrimination. Lindbergh School District has implemented a race-based criteria for its gifted program, while Parkway School District is preventing religious-based clubs. Webster Groves School District has instituted race-based criteria for employees. I am committed to protecting the constitutional rights of all Missourians and will use my authority to combat discrimination.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/1 🚨BREAKING: After receiving reports of religious and race-based discrimination occurring in Missouri schools, I’ve ordered 3 school districts to immediately CEASE and DESIST discriminatory practices against their students and staff. THREAD:

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/2 I’ve received reports that Lindbergh School District has instituted a race-based criteria for students seeking to enter the gifted program.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/3 The program’s traditional pathway to entry requires a student to score in the 95th national percentile on at least one screener or standardized test (math or reading) and in at least the 85th percentile on the other.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/4 The school is allowing students who are part of an underrepresented racial or ethnic population to achieve standardized test scores in the 84th percentile on one test (math or reading) and in the 50th percentile on the other.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/5 The district’s policy states that its goal is to reach a 20% equity index for underrepresented student populations.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/6 If these reports are true, Lindbergh School District is discriminating on the basis of race, in direct violation of both state and federal law. I’ve put the district on notice.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/7 I’ve also received reports that Parkway School District is preventing students from forming religious-based clubs like Fellowship of Christian Athletes.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/8 Reports indicate this includes prohibiting students from using the campus announcement system, hanging posters, or holding FCA meetings on campus.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/9 State and federal law prohibit religious discrimination in schools. I’ve put the district on notice.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/10 I’ve also received reports that Webster Groves School District has instituted race-based criteria for its employees and applicants.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/11 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prevents an employer from refusing to hire, or otherwise discriminate, against employees or candidates because of their race.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/12 Classifying employees and applicants based on race and using this information to make hiring decisions would violate the law. I’ve put the district on notice.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/13 This is about protecting the constitutional rights of all Missourians to be free from discrimination.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/14 As the chief legal officer for the State of Missouri, I am prepared to exercise my office’s full authority under the law to ensure no Missouri school district discriminates against its students or staff.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/15 As long as I’m Attorney General, discrimination will be dead on arrival in this state.

@AGAndrewBailey - Attorney General Andrew Bailey

/16 Read more about my team’s efforts to combat discrimination here: https://ago.mo.gov/attorney-general-bailey-warns-school-districts-to-immediately-cease-discriminatory-practices-against-students-and-staff/

Attorney General Bailey Warns School Districts to Immediately Cease Discriminatory Practices Against Students and Staff | Attorney General Office of Missouri ago.mo.gov
Saved - May 23, 2024 at 6:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Whistleblowers at UCLA medical school reveal that admissions standards for minority applicants have been significantly lowered, resulting in a high failure rate among some cohorts. The new dean of admissions, Jennifer Lucero, is accused of prioritizing racial diversity over academic qualifications. The admissions committee allegedly gives preferential treatment to black and Latino applicants, while white and Asian applicants require near-perfect scores. Dissenting committee members are silenced, and concerns about low test scores are dismissed. The decline in student performance has led to a drop in rankings and raised concerns about clinical competence. The focus on diversity has coincided with a decline in the number of Asian matriculants. The failure rate on standardized tests has increased dramatically since Lucero took over admissions. The collapse in qualifications is compounded by a condensed preclinical curriculum and courses that prioritize social justice over science. The admissions process and curriculum changes are seen as a failure by professors, who believe that students are unprepared for clinical rotations. A significant number of students have failed multiple exams and have not taken licensing exams, leading to extended medical school timelines. The experience at UCLA provides insight into how administrators may circumvent affirmative action bans. The admissions committee is encouraged to select classes that represent the diversity of California, using proxies like zip codes and euphemisms to defend unqualified candidates. The long-term success of these candidates is not disclosed.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

SCOOP: Whistleblowers at UCLA medical school say it has dramatically lowered admissions standards for minority applicants. As a result, they say, 50% of some cohorts now fail basic tests of medical competence. We've obtained shocking internal data.🧵 https://freebeacon.com/campus/a-failed-medical-school-how-racial-preferences-supposedly-outlawed-in-california-have-persisted-at-ucla/

'A Failed Medical School': How Racial Preferences, Supposedly Outlawed in California, Have Persisted at UCLA Long considered one of the best medical schools in the world, the University of California, Los Angeles's David Geffen School of Medicine receives as many as 14,000 applications a year. Of those, it accepted just 173 students in the 2023 admissions cycle, a record-low acceptance rate of 1.3 percent. The median matriculant took difficult science courses in college, earned a 3.8 GPA, and scored in the 88th percentile on the Medical College Admissions Test (MCAT). freebeacon.com

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

UCLA medical school hired a new dean of admissions, Jennifer Lucero, In 2020. Since then, the number of students failing their shelf exams—standardized tests taken after each clinical rotation—has exploded, rising as much as tenfold in some subjects. That wasn't a coincidence.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Race-based admissions have turned UCLA into a "failed medical school," said a former member of the admissions staff. "We want racial diversity so badly, we're willing to cut corners to get it." This is the story of how that happened.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Led by Lucero, who also serves as the DEI czar of UCLA's anesthesiology department, the admissions committee gives black and Latino applicants a pass for subpar metrics, four people who served on it said, while whites and Asians need near perfect scores to even be considered.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Committee members who try to uphold standards are silenced. Two sources said Lucero attacked an admissions officer for raising concerns about an applicant with low test scores. "Did you not know African-American women are dying at a higher rate than everybody else?" she asked.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

The candidate's scores shouldn't matter, she continued,  because "we need people like this in the medical school." "We are not consistent in the way we apply the metrics to these applicants," one admissions official emailed colleagues after the incident. "This is troubling."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"I wondered," the official added, "if this applicant had been [a] white male, or [an] Asian female for that matter, [whether] we would have had that much discussion."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

This story is based on written correspondence between UCLA officials, internal data on student performance, and interviews with eight professors at the medical school—six of whom have worked with or under Lucero on medical student and residency admissions.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Together, they provide an unprecedented account of how racial preferences, outlawed in California since 1996, have nonetheless continued, upending academic standards at one of the top medical schools in the country.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

The school has consequently taken a hit in the rankings and seen a sharp rise in the number of students failing basic standardized tests, raising concerns about their clinical competence. "I have students on their rotation who don't know anything," an admissions official said.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

It is almost unheard of for admissions officers to go public with stories from confidential deliberations, much less to accuse their colleagues of breaking the law or lowering standards. They've agreed to come forward because the drop in student performance has been so alarming.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"I wouldn't normally talk to a reporter," a UCLA faculty member said. "But there's no way to stop this without embarrassing the medical school." Within three years of Lucero's hire, UCLA dropped from 6th to 18th place in U.S. News & World Report's rankings for medical research.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

And in some of the cohorts she admitted, more than 50 percent of students failed standardized tests on emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Those tests, known as shelf exams, which are typically taken at the end of each clinical rotation, measure basic medical knowledge and play a pivotal role in residency applications. Though only 5 percent of students fail each test nationally, the rates are much higher at UCLA.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Failure rates have increased tenfold in some subjects since Lucero took over admissions. That uptick coincided with a steep drop in the number of Asian matriculants and tracks the subjective impressions of faculty who say that students have never been more poorly prepared.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

One professor said that a student in the operating room could not identify a major artery when asked, then berated the professor for putting her on the spot.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Another said that students at the end of their clinical rotations don't know basic lab tests and, in some cases, are unable to present patients. "I don't know how some of these students are going to be junior doctors," the professor said.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"Faculty are seeing a shocking decline in knowledge of medical students." And for those who've seen the competency crisis up close, double standards in admissions are a big part of the problem.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"All the normal criteria for getting into medical school only apply to people of certain races," an admissions officer said. "For other people, those criteria are completely disregarded."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Another admissions officer said that the bar for underrepresented minorities is "as low as you could possibly imagine" and "completely disregards grades and achievements."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Several officials said that they support holistic admissions and don't want test scores judged in isolation. The problem, they say, is that the committee isn't just weighing academics against community service or considering how much time a given kid had to study for the MCAT.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

For certain applicants, they say, hardship and community service seem to be the only things that matter to the majority of the committee's 20-30 members, many of whom were handpicked by Lucero, according to people familiar with the selection process.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"We were always outnumbered," an admissions officer told the Free Beacon, referring to committee members who expressed concern about low grades. "Other people would get upset when we brought up GPA."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Lucero hasn't been kind to dissenters. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, six people who've worked with her described a pattern of racially charged incidents that has dispirited officials and pushed some of them to resign from the committee.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

She has lashed out at officials who question the qualifications of minority candidates, five sources said, suggesting naysayers are "privileged," implying that they are racist, and subjecting them to diversity training sessions.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

After a Native American applicant was rejected in 2021, for example, Lucero chewed out the committee and made members sit through a two-hour lecture on Native history delivered by her own sister, according to three people familiar with the incident.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

In the anesthesiology department, where Lucero helps rank applicants for residencies, she has rebuffed calls to blind the race of candidates, telling colleagues in a 2023 email that, despite California's ban on racial preferences, "we are not required to blind any information."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

That alone could get UCLA in legal trouble, according to Adam Mortara, the lead trial lawyer for the plaintiffs in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Supreme Court case that outlawed affirmative action nationwide.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Asking for information about an applicant's race when "no lawful use can be made of it" is "presumptively illegal," Mortara said. "You can't have evidence of overt discrimination like this and not have someone come forward" as a plaintiff.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Lucero has even advocated moving candidates up or down the residency rank list based on race. At a meeting in 2022, per two people present, she demanded a highly qualified white male be knocked down several spots because, as she put it, "we have too many of his kind" already.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

She also told those who voiced concern that they had no right to an opinion because they were "not BIPOC" and insisted that a Hispanic applicant who had performed poorly on her anesthesiology rotation in medical school should be bumped up. Neither candidate was ultimately moved.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Lucero's comments from the meeting were flagged in an email to UCLA's Discrimination Prevention Office, which has received several complaints about her since 2023, emails show.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

The office has declined to act on those complaints on the grounds that they aren't "serious enough" to merit an investigation, according to a source with direct knowledge of the situation.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

The focus on diversity has coincided with a dramatic shift in the racial and ethnic composition of the medical school, where the number of Asian matriculants fell by almost a third between 2019 and 2022. No other elite medical school in California saw a similar decline.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

As the demographics of UCLA have changed, the number of students failing their shelf exams has soared, trends professors at the medical school say are connected.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Between 2020, the year Lucero assumed her post, and 2023, when the first classes she admitted were taking their shelf exams, the failure rate rose dramatically across all subjects, in some cases increasing tenfold relative to the 2020 baseline.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"1/3 to 1/2 of the medical school is incredibly unqualified," one prof said. The collapse in qualifications has been compounded by UCLA's decision, in 2020, to condense its preclinical curriculum from two years to one in order to add time for research and community service.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

That means students arrive at their clinical rotations with just a year of courses under their belt—some of which focus less on science than social justice.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

First-year students spend three to four hours every other week in "Structural Racism and Health Equity," a required class that covers topics like "fatphobia," has featured anti-Semitic speakers, and is now the subject of an internal review. https://freebeacon.com/campus/pedagogical-malpractice-inside-ucla-medical-schools-mandatory-health-equity-class/

‘Pedagogical Malpractice’: Inside UCLA Medical School’s Mandatory ‘Health Equity’ Class Students in their first year of medical school typically learn what a healthy body looks like and how to keep it that way. At the University of California, Los Angeles, they learn that "fatphobia is medicine’s status quo" and that weight loss is a "hopeless endeavor." freebeacon.com

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

They spend an additional seven hours a week in "Foundations of Practice," which includes units on "interpersonal communication skills" and, according to one medical student, basically "tells us how to be a good person."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

The two courses eat up time that could be spent on physiology or anatomy, professors say, and leave struggling students with fewer hours to learn the basics.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"This has been a colossal failure," one professor posted in April on a forum for medical school applicants. "The new curriculum is not working and the students are grossly unprepared for clinical rotations." https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/ucla-medical-school-in-crisis.1494584/#post-24303365

UCLA Medical School in Crisis I am a faculty member at UCLA and while this is my first post I think everyone will quickly understand why I want to remain anonymous. I also realize that... forums.studentdoctor.net

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Nearly 1/4 of UCLA students failed three or more shelf exams in 2021, forcing some students to repeat classes and persuading others to postpone the Step 2 licensing exam that's typically taken in the third year of medical school and is a prerequisite for most residency programs. https://t.co/tpq5O76ejw

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Around 20 percent of UCLA students have not taken Step 2 by January of their fourth year, according to the data. Ten percent have not even taken the more basic Step 1—an "extremely high number," one professor said, that will force many students to extend medical school. https://t.co/X3RQrWlcjP

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

"It's a combination of a bad curriculum and bad selection," another professor said, referring to the admissions process. Some students are accepted with GPAs so low "they shouldn't even be applying."

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

As medical schools around the country adjust to the Supreme Court's affirmative action ban, the experience of UCLA offers a preview of how administrators may skirt the law and devise public-spirited excuses for violating it.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Lucero has told the admissions committee that each class should "represent" the "diversity" of California, including its remote and rural areas, so that graduating students will return to their hometowns and beef up the medical infrastructure there, officials say.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Race is rarely mentioned outright, and unlike the committee for anesthesiology residents, the committee for students does not see the race or ethnicity of applicants.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

Instead, officials say, Lucero uses proxies like zip codes and euphemisms like "disadvantaged" to shut down criticism of unqualified candidates, citing a statistic that, technically, most students with below-average MCATs make it to their second year of medical school.

@aaronsibarium - Aaron Sibarium

How well they do after that point goes undiscussed and undisclosed. "We have asked for metrics on how these folks actually do," one committee member said. "None of that is ever divulged to us."

Saved - October 1, 2024 at 3:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Seattle Public Schools will end all gifted and talented programs, requiring neighborhood schools to integrate gifted students into regular classrooms. This change aims to address equity concerns, as historically, these programs have had a higher representation of white and Asian students. The decision has sparked significant backlash online, with many expressing that it is unfair to other students. Parents, especially those from schools like Cascadia Elementary, are upset about the quality of education being compromised as cohorts are phased out by the 2027-2028 school year.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Seattle Public Schools are now being forced to end all their gifted and talented programs because too many whites and Asians are qualifying “Starting this fall, all neighborhood schools in Seattle will have to incorporate gifted students into their classrooms. Typically, many of these highly capable students are either separated into different schools or what's known as cohorts where they're kept together so teachers can focus on their advanced needs. But Seattle Public Schools is getting rid of the cohort model in the name of equity. Historically, it boils down to highly capable cohorts having more white and Asian students and other races underrepresented. The Seattle government is forcing all of its public schools to end all their gifted and talented programs because too many whites and Asians are qualifying. They claim that this isn't equitable and that there needs to be more diversity. This decision from the Seattle government has garnered backlash online. Commenters claimed that this is a terrible decision and that this is unfair to the other students. But what do you think about this decision from Seattle?“ More info “Seattle schools phasing out highly capable cohort program. Many parents praised the quality of education at schools like Cascadia Elementary in North Seattle. Now, they're incensed by the district's plan to cancel all cohorts, phasing them out completely by the 2027–2028 school year” per Fox

Video Transcript AI Summary
Starting this fall, Seattle neighborhood schools must incorporate gifted students into regular classrooms, ending the cohort model. The cohort model separated highly capable students into different schools or groups, allowing teachers to focus on their advanced needs. Seattle schools is eliminating this model in the name of equity. Historically, highly capable cohorts contained more white and Asian students, with other races being underrepresented. According to one speaker, the Seattle government is ending all gifted programs because too many white and Asian students qualify, which they claim isn't equitable. This decision has received backlash online, with commenters claiming it is a terrible decision and unfair to other students.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Starting this fall, all neighborhood schools in Seattle will have to incorporate gifted students into their classrooms. Typically, many of these highly capable students are either separated into different schools or what's known as cohorts where they're kept together so teachers can focus on their advanced needs. But Seattle schools is getting rid of the cohort model in the name of equity. Historically, it boils down to highly capable cohorts having more white and Asian students and other races underrepresented. Speaker 1: The Seattle government is forcing all of its public schools to end all their gifted and talented programs because too many whites and Asians are qualifying. They claim that this isn't equitable and that there needs to be more diversity. This decision from the Seattle government has garnered backlash online. Commenters claimed that this is a terrible decision and that this is unfair to the other students. But what do you think about this decision from Seattle? Comment your opinion down below.
Saved - October 5, 2024 at 2:32 PM

@jeremykauffman - Jeremy Kauffman 🦔

3 out of 10 black applicants for police jobs in Maryland were unable to pass a standardized test. Because almost all whites passed, black applicants sued and won a $2.75m settlement. 25 failing blacks will also be hired for police jobs. This is the math section of the test: https://t.co/zjVzO6DSSs

Saved - January 17, 2025 at 4:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I emphasize the urgent need to address anti-white laws in America, drawing parallels to South Africa's Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment laws. These laws create systemic barriers for white individuals in employment and education, leading to significant distortions in society. I argue that America's legal framework fosters similar discrimination, particularly through racial quotas and disparate impact regulations. To reverse this trend, I believe we must eliminate these laws and ensure true equality without bias, or risk becoming a nation like South Africa.

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

This is a critical point that we must remember as we work to reverse America’s South Africanization: Framed as being for equality, civil rights, and such, there are many laws designed specifically to effect anti-white racism It’s those laws we must destroy🧵👇

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

First, as to South Africa, the main issue are the “Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment,” or BEE laws These are effectively affirmative action on steroids and compliance with them is required for any business that needs a license from or to work with the government must comply The state measures compliance via a scoring system that tracks compliance based on how companies use racial preferences to hire black workers, promote those black workers to management positions, and hand company ownership to blacks

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

This leads to obscene, country destroying distortions Not least of which, it effectively means that it is impossible to hire white workers, as at only ~7% of the population, quota-based hiring and promotion means only a few can ever be hired This can even lead to job cuts to meet quotas: electric utility Eskom, known mainly for constant rolling blackouts, was considering firing thousands of its experienced white engineers to meet racial quotas

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

Similarly, the quotas and similar “diversity” requirements of BEE-style laws make it near impossible for white South Africans to get into universities or other professional schools So, you get laws that, in the name of “equity,” screen out nearly all of the white population from most schools and jobs And that’s before considering state hostility to whites that leads to non-investigation of farm murders and similar atrocities

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

While we don’t like admitting it, America is in a similar position and is seeing similar results; @realJeremyCarl does a great job documenting this in his “The Unprotected Class” We, like South Africa, have a great many anti-white laws that are leading to similar outcomes

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

For one, America has outright racial discrimination in government contracting that has been explicitly allowed by the Supreme Court This leads to situations where minority-owned contractors (sometimes just expensive fronts for white businesses) get government work despite being more far more expensive and doing lower quality work than the non-minority contractors against which they were bidding, purely because of their race And this does happen. Atlanta made it a requirement during the construction of Hartsfield-Jackson that a quarter of the contractors had to be minorities. That went as one would expect

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

Then there are university admissions, and similar sorts of schools and programs, whether for professions or trades Though race quotas are technically banned and outright DEI admissions got limited by SCOTUS, now being only allowed for the military academies, there is still enough cover for administrators to be biased against whites in admissions, but not other ethnic groups. As the universities are full of Marxists, that’s what they generally do, as even merit based admissions get interpreted as “racism” due to disparate impact

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

And that leads into the biggest issue: disparate impact Created by SCOTUS in Griggs v Duke Power and later codified as law by HW Bush, it means that any test for employment is illegal under CRA rules if it results in disparate impact against “protected classes,” even if there was no discriminatory intent So, as this effectively bans any IQ tests due to racial IQ difference, and bans similar tests of basic reasoning, it makes it near impossible for companies impacted by the CRA (15 or more employees) to hire the best candidates Instead, unless they have employment tests that are very, very narrowly tailored to the job, they effectively have to hire based on racial quotas, but with a slight yo major tilt against whites, as doing so will be interpreted by courts as discrimination against protected classes

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

And this does happen A black woman won millions of dollars in a discrimination suit against Equinox gym because it fired her for not showing up on times…dozens of times. That was deemed discrimination Police departments, fire departments, and the like routinely lose disparate impact suits for tests requiring prospective hires to do basic tests of physical fitness and reasoning. Those are also deemed discrimination

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

Our government is just less honest than South Africa’s about its anti-white racism So, instead of requiring the hiring of racial quotas, requiring anti-white discrimination, etc., it says that companies, colleges, and so on are not allowed to “discriminate on the basis of personal characteristics like race, gender, etc,” which generally sounds fair to most, at least at first. But the devil is in the details and in this case that devil is how such discrimination is interpreted: anything other than results showing different groups are perfectly equal in every way, the egalitarian holy grail, is considered discrimination. This effectively requires anti-white discrimination, but without saying as much

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

The results of going to legal war with nature and the differences in human capabilities it created are predictably South African California is on fire because of incompetence and the lesbian DEI commissar is on tape describing how she won’t rescue men from burning buildings Young white guys have trouble getting into college, effectively a requirement for good work because it fills (in expensive fashion) the purpose of the IQ tests that used to be used, and thus unable to get good work. They’re then berated for not pulling themselves up by the bootstraps, despite being legally forbidden from doing so, as we saw during the discussion surrounding H1bs Speaking of, companies being over multitudes of H1bs to fill diversity quotas with those who are at least marginally competent, which depresses wages and exacerbates the work issue All that and much, much more has turned America into a low trust country in which the tap water is often dangerously filthy, crime is high and getting higher, and deaths of despair are ever more common amongst white men

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

And adding to this is how it plays out in the (in)justice system: Like farm murders in SA not being investigated out of spite and incompetence, men like Derek Chauvin who enforce the law are railroaded for doing so because enforcement of the law is effectively a disparate impact activity

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

All of that must be wiped away if America is going to get back on track Yes, culture and public opinion matter. But both are downstream of law And law should, if it is going to prohibit anything at all (preferably none of this would exist and all would just be preference, from home sales to corporate hiring), then it must prohibit discrimination of any sort, rather than all discrimination except anti-white discrimination The latter is what South Africa has done, and it’s a hellhole. It’s also what America is doing, and we’re turning into one

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

So, if the Trump administration really wants to Make America Great Again, it must rip away all the laws that are effecting America’s South Africanization If it doesn’t, and we continue on the same track as we’re on now and that Harris wanted to push us further along, nothing done will matter; all the tax cuts in the world matter little when the water and electricity run out…

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

This is one positive To answer Bannon’s question, they’re here because South Africa is awful due to the very policies that they need to destroy in this Trump administration So, theoretically, they know what needs to be done It remains to be seen if they will, though

@Will_Tanner_1 - Will Tanner

Don't South Africa My America! https://theamericantribunestore.com/products/dont-south-africa-my-america-white-11oz-ceramic-mug

Don't South Africa My America White 11oz Ceramic Mug This beautiful ceramic mug is perfect for any event of the day. Your morning coffee, a hot chocolate, or any other hot beverage you enjoy. The mug is glossy white and the prints come out beautifully and vividly on it. The print retains its quality and luster when used in both microwaves and the dishwasher. - Ceramic 11 theamericantribunestore.com
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 4:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Marc Andreessen's recent conversation with Lex Fridman revealed significant insights, including the manipulation of banking systems against political figures, the failures of universities to recruit top talent, and the complexities of the American resource advantage. He discussed the evolution of digital communities into real-world entities and the challenges of AI ethics. The conversation highlighted the decline of traditional media influence and the rise of personal branding as essential for founders today. Overall, it emphasized the importance of authentic thought leadership in a rapidly changing landscape.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

Marc Andreessen just shocked the world on Lex Fridman. He exposed: • Government forcing banks to cut off Trump's family • Universities discriminating against certain races • Meta's ridiculous diversity policy 12 insights from their conversation I can't stop thinking about🧵 https://t.co/pnV0b5rN2g

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

1. The Hidden Power of Dinner Parties At Silicon Valley dinner parties, everyone agrees on everything. But there's a secret "whisper network" where real conversations happen. The truth? Most elites are afraid to speak their minds publicly. https://t.co/L27a2MCTLv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is there a deeper turmoil of ideas beneath the surface chatter at dinner parties? While socialization occurs among close friends, true beliefs and struggles often remain unexpressed. At these gatherings, heretical ideas that challenge the status quo are rarely discussed openly. Instead, they tend to be shared in private conversations or through a sort of whisper network. When meeting someone new, there’s a subtle dance of determining whether it’s safe to share thoughts or if conformity is required. This creates an atmosphere where genuine dialogue is limited, and connections are cautiously navigated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it possible that the surface chatter of dinner parties underneath that, there is a turmoil of ideas and thoughts and beliefs that's going on, but you're just talking to people really close to you or in your own mind, and then the socialization happens at the dinner parties. Like, when you go outside the inner circle of one, two, 3, 4 people who you really trust, then you start to conform. But inside there inside the mind, there is an actual belief or a struggle attention with The New York Times or with the with the listener. For the listener, there's a there's a slow smile that overtook Marc Andreessen's face. So, Speaker 1: like, I'll just tell you what I think, which is at at at the dinner parties and at the conferences, no. There's none of that. It's what what there is is that all of the heretical conversations, anything that challenges the status quo, any heretical ideas and any new idea, you know, is a heretical idea. Any deviation. It the it's either discussed a 1 on 1 face to face. It's it's like a whisper network or it's like a real life social network. There's a secret handshake, which is like, okay. You meet somebody and you, like, know each other a little bit, but, like, not well. And, like, you're both trying to figure out if you can, like, talk to the other person openly or whether you have to, like, be fully conformist. It's a joke.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

2. The University System Is Broken National Merit Scholars represent the top 0.5% of intellectual talent in America. Yet not a single university actively recruits them. While they have full-time scouts for sports, pure genius goes unnoticed. https://t.co/YTf4xSXVsc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Merit Scholarship System was established during the Cold War to identify the nation's top 0.5% of students based on intelligence, using PSAT and SAT scores as measures. This system focuses solely on academic ability, without considering race, gender, or other characteristics. Each year, it recognizes the highest-scoring students, narrowing down from the top 1% of PSAT scores to the top 0.5% who also excel on the SAT. The scholarship amount, originally significant, is now around $25,100. This initiative aims to discover and reward exceptional talent among high school students.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me give you one more positive scenario, which and then I'll also beat up on the university some more. Do you but do you know about the National Merit Scholarship System? Have you heard about this? Not really. Can you explain? So there's a system that was created during the cold war, called the National Merit Scholars, and, it is a basically, it was created, I forget, in the late fifties or sixties when it was when people in government actually wanted to identify the best and the brightest. Mhmm. As heretical an idea as that sounds today. And so it's basically a national talent search for, basically, IQ. It it its goal is to identify, basically, the top 0.5% of the IQ, in the country, by the way, completely regardless of other characteristics. So there's no race, gender, or any other aspect to it. It's just going for straight intelligence. It uses the first the PSAT, which is the preparatory SAT that you take, and then the SAT. So it uses those scores. That that that is the scoring. It's a straight PSAT SAT scoring system. So they use the SAT as a proxy for IQ, which it is. They run this every year. They identify they they it's like a they get down to, like, 1% of the population of the kids, 18 year olds in a given year who score highest on the PSAT, and then they get down to they further qualify down to the 0.5% that also replicate on the SAT. And then it's like the scholarship amount is, like, $25100. Right? So it's like it was a lot of money 50 years ago, not as much today. But it's a national system being run literally to find

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

3. The Brain Drain Problem We're depleting other nations in three devastating ways: • Taking their most brilliant minds • Removing future leadership • Creating unstable regions It's colonialism for human capital, and the consequences are starting to show. https://t.co/C5UFyqgoRT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four countries have been draining their smart talent, particularly from peripheral eurozone nations like Greece, where a brain drain has left the government struggling to develop an economic plan as young, skilled individuals leave. This issue also affects Ukraine, which has been losing talent due to recruitment and migration caused by war. As Ukraine looks to rebuild, it may lack the skilled workforce it once had. Similarly, Russia has experienced significant brain drain over the past 30 years. Interestingly, while the West recognizes the moral wrongs of colonization and resource extraction, it often overlooks the ethical implications of extracting human capital, viewing it as a positive development rather than considering the impact on the countries losing their talent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Basically, what what we what we, 4 countries, have been doing is draining all the smart people out. Mhmm. It's actually much easier for people in Europe to talk about this, I've discovered, because the eurozone is whatever, you know, 28 countries. And within the eurozone, the high skilled people over time have been migrating to originally the UK, but also specifically, I think it's the Netherlands, Germany, and France. But specifically, they've been migrating out of the peripheral eurozone countries. And the the the one where this really hit the fan was in Greece. Right? So, you know, Greece falls into chaos, disaster, and then, you know, you're running the government in Greece, and you're trying to figure out how to put an economic development plan together. All of your smart young kids have left. Like, what are you gonna do? Right? By the way, this is a potential I I know you care a lot about Ukraine. This is a potential crisis for Ukraine, not because in part because of this because we enthusiastically recruit Ukrainians, of course, and so we've been drain brain draining Ukraine for a long time. Mhmm. But, also, of course, you know, war does tend to cause people to to migrate out. And so, you know, when it comes time for Ukraine to rebuild as a peaceful country, is it gonna have the talent base even that it had 5 years ago is, like, a very big and important question. By the way, Russia like, we have brain drain a lot of really smart people out of Russia. A lot of them are here, right, over the last, you know, 30 years. And so there's this thing. It's actually really funny if you think about it. Like, the one thing that we know to be the height of absolute evil that the west ever did was colonization Mhmm. And resource extraction. Right? So we know the height of absolute evil was when the Portuguese and English and, you know, everybody else went and had these colonies and then went in and we, you know, took all the oil and we took all the diamonds and we took all the whatever lithium or whatever it is. Right? Well, for some reason, we realized that that's a deeply evil thing to do when it's a physical resource, when it's a nonconscious physical matter. For some reason, we think it's completely morally acceptable to do it with human capital. In fact, we think it's glorious and beautiful and wonderful and, you know, the great flowering of of, of, peace and harmony and and moral justice of our time to do it. And we don't think for one second what we're doing to the countries that we're pulling all these people out of.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

4. The Rise of Network States Digital communities are evolving into real-world entities. Future citizenship won't be determined by where you're born. Instead, it will be shaped by what you believe in and the networks you join. https://t.co/2GZJQRjtxZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've been observing a situation where corrupt elites are struggling to maintain the support of the masses, while new elites are taking advantage of the circumstances. This serves as a case study highlighting the dangers of a society where most people reject the core values they are expected to uphold. A key takeaway is that it's detrimental for a society to create a divide between what is privately believed and what is publicly expressed. Censorship attempts to control thoughts by limiting speech, which ultimately harms societal cohesion and understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we've been living through the, you know, the the true believer elites masses, you know, thing with, you know, with a set of, like, basically incredibly corrupt elites wondering why they don't have the wealthy masses anymore and a set of new elites that are running away with things. And so, like, we're we're living through this, like, incredible applied case study, of these ideas. And, you know, if there's a moral of the story, it is, you know, I think fairly obvious, which is it's it's a really bad idea for a society to wedge itself into a position in which most people don't believe the fundamental precepts of what they're told they have to do, you know, to be to be good people like that. That is just not not a good state to be in. Speaker 1: So one of the ways to avoid that in the future maybe is to keep the delta between what's said in private and what's said in public small. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's like, well, this is sort of the the siren song of censorship is we can keep people from saying things, which means we can keep people from thinking things. Yeah. And, you know, by

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

5. The Diversity Paradox Peter Thiel sits on Meta's board of directors. When NASDAQ mandated board diversity rules, he counted as diverse for being LGBT. The irony? He literally wrote a book called "The Diversity Myth." https://t.co/57jwboR7ff

Video Transcript AI Summary
The overreach of government power is concerning, even for those involved. It resembles the corrupting influence of the "ring of power" from "The Lord of the Rings," which grants immense power but ultimately leads to moral decay. Characters like Gollum illustrate how the desire for power can transform individuals into corrupted versions of themselves. The temptation of censorship is similarly strong; once in control, it's hard to resist using that power. Reflecting years later, one might realize that their initial intentions of patriotism have led to authoritarianism, undermining democracy and Western values.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll we'll see where they take it. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's truly disturbing. I don't think anybody wants this kind of overreach of power for government, including perhaps people that were participating in it. It's like this dark momentum of power. They just get caught up in it, and that's the reason there's that kind of protection. Nobody wants that. Speaker 0: So I use the metaphor of the ring of power. And Yeah. For people who don't catch the reference, that's lord lord of the rings. And the thing with the ring of power and lord of the rings, it's the ring that golem has in the beginning, and it turns you invisible, and it turns out it, like, unlocks all this, like, fearsome power. It's the most powerful thing in the world. It's key to everything. And basically, the the the moral lesson of lord of the rings, which was, you know, written by a guy who thought very deeply about these things is, yeah, the ring of power is inherently corrupting. The characters at one point, they're like, end off. Just put on the ring and, like, fix this. Right? And he's like he's like, he will not put the ring on even to, like, end the war, because he knows that it will corrupt him. And then, you know, the character as it starts, the character of Gollum is the result of, you know, it's like, like, a normal character who ultimately becomes, you know, this incredibly corrupt and deranged version of himself. And so, I mean, I think you I think you said something actually quite profound there, which is the ring of power is infinitely tempting. You know, the censorship machine is infinitely tempting. If you if you have it, like, you are going to use it. It's overwhelmingly tempting because it's so powerful and that it will corrupt you. And, yeah, I I don't know whether any of these people feel any of this today. They should. I don't know if they do. But, yeah, you go out 5 or 10 years later, you know, you would hope that you would realize that your soul has been corroded, and you probably started out thinking that you were a patriot, and you were trying to defend democracy, and you ended up being, you know, extremely authoritarian and anti democratic and anti western.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

6. The American Resource Advantage Our natural abundance defies logic and prediction. Every time experts warn about scarcity, we discover new deposits. This isn't luck - it's a pattern that's repeated throughout our history. https://t.co/XUnYWOtUxP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US is positioned for significant growth due to various factors, both fortunate and the result of hard work. Geographically, the US benefits from its own continent, providing physical security and abundant natural resources. There's a humorous notion that whenever the US seems to be running low on a rare earth material, a farmer in North Dakota discovers a massive deposit. The country has the potential for energy independence and can become a major net energy exporter. The previous administration chose to limit American energy production, but the current administration aims to revitalize it. Ultimately, the ability to be energy independent is a matter of choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The US is just flat out primed for growth, and I think that's a consequence of many factors. You know, some of which were are lucky and some of which through hard work. And so the lucky part is just, you know, number 1, we know we just have, like, incredible physical security by being our own continent. You know, we have incredible natural resources. Right? There's there's there's this running joke now that, like, whenever it looks like The US is gonna run out of some, like, rare earth material, you know, some farmer in North Dakota, like, kicks over a hay bale and finds, like, a $2,000,000,000,000 deposit. Mhmm. Right? Right? I mean, we're we're just, like, blessed, you know, with with with geography and the natural resources. Energy, you know, we can be energy independent anytime we want. This last administration decided they didn't wanna be. They wanted to turn off American energy. This new administration has declared that they have a goal of turning it on in a dramatic way. There's no question we can be energy dependent. We can be a giant net energy exporter. It's purely a question of choice.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

7. The Death of H1B Visas The system has evolved beyond recognition. Big tech has abandoned H1Bs for O1 visas, while consulting mills exploit the old system. What was meant to attract genius has become a bureaucratic maze. https://t.co/XWmcC8fhmv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The H-1B visa is less commonly used in the tech industry now, with the O-1 visa becoming more prevalent. The O-1 is known as the "super genius visa" for individuals who have made significant technological breakthroughs and wish to start companies in the U.S. It has a high acceptance rate but requires substantial proof of qualifications. The H-1B program mainly serves two types of employers: large tech companies that hire in bulk and consulting firms, often referred to as "mills," that primarily employ Indian workers. These firms typically offer mid-tier IT consulting jobs, with salaries ranging from $60,000 to $100,000, significantly lower than the higher salaries in Silicon Valley.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Use some good to the h one b. Okay. So then you get this other okay. So then there's It's come come all the way around. There's another nuance. So there's another nuance. There's another nuance, which is mostly in the valley we don't use h one b's anymore. Mhmm. Mostly we use o ones. So there's a there's a you mean, there's a separate class of visa and and the o one is like this it it turns out the o one is the super genius visa. Mhmm. So the o one is the basically our our founder. Like, when we have, like, a when we have somebody from anywhere in the world and they've, like, invented a breakthrough in new technology and they want to come to the US to start a company, they come in through an o one visa. And and there and that actually is like a it's a fairly high bar. It's a high acceptance rate, but it's like a pretty high bar and they they do a lot of work and they there's like a you have to put real work into it, really really prove your case. Mostly, what's happened with the h one b visa program, is that it has gone to basically 2 categories of employers. 1 is, the basically a small set of big tech companies that hire in volume, which is exactly the companies that you would think. And then the other is it goes to these what they call kind of the mills, the consulting mills. Right? And so there's these set of companies with names. I don't wanna pick on companies, but, you know, names like Cognizant that, you know, hire basically have their business model. Is primarily Indian bringing primarily Indians, in in large numbers. And, you know, they often have, you know, offices next to company owned housing, and they'll have, you know, organizations that are, you know, they'll have, you know, organizations that are literally thousands of Indians, you know, living and working in the US, and they do basically, call it mid tier, like, IT consulting. So, you know, these folks are making good good good good wages, but they're making 60 or 80 or $100,000 a year, not the, you know, 300,000 that you'd make in the valley.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

8. The Banking System's Dark Side The weaponization of finance has reached new levels. Even Trump's wife and son got debanked. When you can cut off someone's family from the banking system, you've crossed a line that can't be uncrossed. https://t.co/SBWnj8brYY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Universities receive funding from four main sources. First, federal student loans, which amount to trillions and are growing faster than inflation. Second, federal research funding, where universities often take up to 70% of grants for central use. Third, tax exemptions at the operating level, based on their nonprofit status. Fourth, tax exemptions for endowments, which serve as financial buffers. Analyzing these sources reveals that if federal and state funding were removed, many universities would face bankruptcy, highlighting the need for a potential rebuild of their financial structures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's next? Okay. So let's go let's go through it. So the the the universities the universe the universities are funded by 4 primary sources of federal funding. The the big 1 is a federal student loan program, which is, you know, in the many trillions of dollars at this point and then only spiraling, you know, way faster than than inflation. That's number 1. Number 2 is federal research funding, which is also very large. And you probably know that, when a scientist at university gets a research grant, the university rakes as much as 70% of the money, for central uses. Yeah. Number 3 is tax exemption at the operating level, which is based on the idea that these are nonprofit institutions as opposed to, let's say, political institutions. And then number 4 is tax, exemptions at the endowment level, you know, which is the financial buffer that these places have. Anybody who's been close to a university budget will basically see that what would happen if you went through those sources of federal taxpayer money. And then for the state schools, the state money, they they all instantly go bankrupt. And then you could rebuild. Then you could rebuild because the problem right now,

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

9. The Social Media Revolution The past decade of social media enforced conformity and control. But something remarkable is happening: the walls are coming down. We're witnessing the rebirth of genuine free speech online. https://t.co/6GYPfuxIP0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The happiest moments for many in the last decade stem from the freedom to express themselves without fear of being criticized or shamed. This shift allowed for more genuine conversations. Online, a similar dynamic emerged with the rise of group chats, which became a refuge from the enforced conformity of social networks. These platforms often practiced censorship and were prone to mobbing and shaming. However, with breakthroughs like Elon Musk's acquisition of X and the rise of Substack, there has been a significant change in the landscape of free speech online, allowing for more open discussions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, the happiest mo at least in the last decade, those are, like, the happiest moments of everybody's lives because they're just, like everybody's just ecstatic because they're like, I don't have to worry about getting yelled at and shamed, like, for every third sentence that comes out of my mouth, and we can actually talk about real things. So so that's the live version of it. And then the and then, of course, the other side of it is the the, you know, the group chat the group chat phenomenon. Right. And and then this and then basically the same thing played out, you know, until until Elon bought x and until Substack took off, you know, which were really the 2 big breakthroughs in free speech online. The the same dynamic played out online, which is you had absolute conformity on the social networks, like, literally enforced by the social networks themselves through censorship and and then also through cancellation campaigns and mobbing and shaming. Right? And and but then you had but but then group chats grew up to be the equivalent of Samostat. Right? Mhmm. Anybody

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

10. The AI Ethics Challenge Every major AI system reflects California's political values. This creates a fascinating problem: how will other cultures react? The battle for AI's moral compass is just beginning. https://t.co/UpBAchYCu1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Future chips and the implications of AI training raise significant questions. What guidelines govern the content and moral teachings these systems provide? Additionally, how many countries would want to base their education, healthcare, and political systems on AI shaped by extreme left-wing California ideologies? The reality is that very few nations would be inclined to adopt such a framework.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another $1,000,000,000,000 question, future chips, which I know you've you've talked a lot about. Another $1,000,000,000,000 question. Yeah. I mean, all the global issue. Oh, another $1,000,000,000,000 question, censorship. Right? Like and and and and, and all the as they say with all the, human feedback training process. Exactly what are you training these things to do? What are they allowed to talk about? How long do they give you these how how often do they give these incredibly preaching moral lectures? How or here's a here's a here's a good here's a $1,000,000,000,000 question. How many other countries want their country to run its education system, health care system, new system, political system on the basis of an AI that's been trained according to the most extreme left wing California politics? Right? Because that's kind of what they have on offer right now, and I think the answer to that is not very many.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

11. The Crypto-AI Convergence Here's what most are missing about AI's future: Billions of AI agents will need their own economy. Cryptocurrency isn't just surviving - it's becoming essential infrastructure. https://t.co/KGt2nF4OmC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Exciting changes are on the horizon for social media, with a significant reinvigoration expected over the next four years. This transformation will extend beyond platforms like X to others as well. Additionally, the crypto market is poised for a resurgence. The intersection of AI and crypto is particularly noteworthy, as the rise of numerous AI agents will create a need for an economic system. Crypto, with its programmable money and efficient transaction processing, is seen as the ideal solution for this emerging economy. The potential impact of the crypto-AI relationship could be substantial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Exciting. So I think one of the things we can look forward to in the next 4 years is, number 1, just like a massive reinvigoration of social media as a consequence of the changes that are happening right now. I'm very excited to see the con to see what's going to happen with that. And then, and it's happened on x, but it's now going to happen on other platforms. And then, the other is, crypto's gonna come, you know, crypto's gonna come right back to life. And, actually, that's very exciting. Actually, that's worth noting is that's another $1,000,000,000,000 question on AI, which is, in a world of pervasive AI and especially in a world of AI agents and imagine a world of 1,000,000,000 or trillions of AI agents running around, they need an economy. And in crypto, in our view, happens to be the ideal economic system for that. Right? Because it's programmable money. It's a very easy way to plug in and and do that, and there's this transaction processing system that can that can do that. And so I think the crypto AI intersection, you know, is potentially very a very, very big deal.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

12. The Hollywood Awakening The entertainment industry faces three massive shifts: • Return of creative freedom • End of enforced conformity • Revival of comedy and risk-taking We're entering a new golden age. https://t.co/GzVblxzai9

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was recently with a group of Hollywood individuals who, despite being vocally anti-Trump, acknowledged a significant shift since November 6. They felt the atmosphere had changed, describing it as a thawing of the ice. Many projects that were previously stalled are now moving forward, and there's a renewed interest in making comedies. This sentiment of change is echoed across various sectors, with business leaders expressing relief that a decade of difficulties seems to be over.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ready. And then I was with a group of Hollywood people about two weeks ago, and they were still, you know, people who at least at least vocally were still very anti Trump. But I said, you know, has anything changed since since Nov. 6? And they they immediately said, oh, it's completely different. It feels like the ice has thawed, you know, woke us over. You know, they said that all kinds of projects are gonna be able to get made now that couldn't before, that, you know, probably was gonna start making comedies again. You know? Like, it's it's they were just like, it's it's like a it's like a just like an incredible immediate, environmental change. And I'm as I talk to people kinda throughout, you know, certainly throughout the economy, people who run businesses, I I hear that all the time, which is just this this last ten years of misery is just over. I mean, the

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

13. The Power of Humor Memes have become modern society's truth-telling mechanism. When direct speech is risky, jokes reveal real beliefs. That's why every secret group eventually becomes a meme-sharing network. https://t.co/zF74fAbqRk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Deviations in conversation often happen through subtle, informal networks, like a "whisper network." A joke can serve as a signal; if the other person laughs, the conversation can continue, but if not, it's best to retreat. Humor allows for discussing serious topics while maintaining deniability, as comedians can often say, "It was just a joke." Laughter is involuntary and reveals truths that may be off-limits to discuss openly. When someone laughs, it indicates that a deeper, often unspoken truth is being acknowledged, breaking the ice and allowing for more open dialogue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any deviation, it the it's either discussed a 1 on 1 face to face. It's it's like a whisper network, or it's like a realized social network. Here's a secret handshake, which is like, okay. You meet somebody and you, like, know each other a little bit, but, like, not well and, like, you're both trying to figure out if you can, like, talk to the other person openly or whether you have to, like, be fully conformist. It's a joke. Oh, yeah. Humor. Somebody cracks a joke. Right? Somebody cracks a joke. Yep. If the other person laughs, the conversation is on. Yeah. Yeah. If the other person doesn't laugh, back slowly away from the scene. Yeah. I didn't mean anything by it. Yeah. Right? And and, by the way, it doesn't have to be, like, a super offensive joke. It just has to be a joke that's just up against the edge of 1 of the, use the Sam Bankman Fried term, 1 of the chivalis. You know, it has to be up against one of the things, of, you know, one of the things that you're absolutely required to to believe to be the dinner parties. And then and then at that point, what happens is you have a peer to peer network. Right? You you have you have you have a you have a a one to one connection with somebody, and then you you have your you have your your little conspiracy of of thought thought criminality. And then you have your net you've probably been through this. You have your network of thought criminals, and then they have their network of thought criminals, and then you have this, like, delicate mating dance as to whether you should bring the thought criminals together. Mhmm. Right? And the dance of fundamental, mechanism of the dance is humor. Yeah. It's humor. Like, it's right. Well, of course. Memes. Yeah. Well, for two for two reasons. Number 1 number 1, humor is a way to have deniability. Right? Humor is a way to discuss serious things without without without with having deniability. Oh, I'm sorry. It was just a joke. Right? So so that's part of it, which is one of the reasons why comedians can get away with saying things the rest of us can't. This is, you know, they they can always fall back on, oh, yeah. I was just going for the laugh. But but the other key thing about humor, right, is that is that laughter is involuntary. Right? Like, you either laugh or you don't. And and it's not like a conscious decision whether you're gonna laugh. And everybody can tell when somebody's fake laughing. Right? And as every professional comedian knows this. Right? The laughter is the clue that you're onto something truthful. Mhmm. Like, people don't laugh at, like, made up bullshit stories. They they laugh because, like, you're revealing something that they either have not been allowed to think about or have not been allowed to talk about, right, or is off limits. And all of a sudden, it's like the ice breaks, and it's like, oh, yeah. That's the thing. And it's funny. And, like, I laugh.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

14. The Great Unwinding Old systems are crumbling. New ones are emerging. The institutions that seemed invincible last decade now look vulnerable. We're watching history's page turn in real time. https://t.co/4aPqztqsqE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The previous administration favored big government and did not make efforts to reduce regulations or spending. However, the new administration could argue that their actions comply with a Supreme Court decision requiring the unwinding of certain regulations deemed unconstitutional. This involves addressing regulations, spending, and personnel simultaneously. There are innovative strategies being developed to tackle these issues. Many former government officials express skepticism, believing that achieving these goals is impossible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, the previous White House, of course, was super in favor of big government. They had no desire to they did nothing based on this. They they didn't, you know, pull anything back in. But the new regime, if they choose to, could say, look. The the thing that we're doing here is not, you know, challenging the laws. We're actually complying with the supreme court decision that basically says we have to unwind a lot of this and we have to unwind the regulations which are no longer legal, constitutional. We have to unwind the spend and we have to unwind the people. And so and that's how you get from basically, you connect the thread from the regulation part back to the money part, back to the people part. They have work going on all 3 of these threads. They have, I would say, incredibly creative ideas on how to deal with this. I'm I I know lots of former government people who a 100% of them are super cynical on this topic, and they're like, this is impossible. This could never possibly

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

The most fascinating aspect: These insights didn't come from mainstream media. They came from a 4-hour, unfiltered conversation where Marc could speak freely. This is the future of influence... The old gatekeepers are losing power:

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

Long-form podcasts and social media have created a new kind of thought leadership: • Raw and unfiltered • Deep and nuanced • Direct to audience No editorial oversight. No agenda. Just truth. Founders are now choosing this path deliberately. https://t.co/sjT1ctTDlY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Success comes from being genuine and expressing your true thoughts. There's no need to put on a show, especially when past successes have already been achieved. Asking genuine questions builds trust, allowing words to flow naturally. Each word choice is a decision, reflecting your intent. Language can be used to manipulate or gain power, but true communication involves honesty. Every choice in how you express yourself is a moral decision that shapes your integrity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, you know, look. What here. Part of the reason that you're so successful, in my opinion, is because you actually say what you think. Like, you're not putting on a show. Actually, you have no reason to put on a show. You put on a whole bunch of shows and they've already been successful. You know, when you're actually asking the questions that are genuine questions and people can trust you because of that, and that means that you're letting the words emerge as they come to you. And each of doing that with each word, that's a decision, you know, because you can use your language to manipulate and you can use your language to for your own, say, hedonistic purposes or to gain power, or you can just say what you think. Every like, all of those different choices are a decision. That's a wrestling. That's a moral decision.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

Instead of op-eds in the NYT, Marc Andreesen's amplifying influence through: • Authentic podcast appearances • His OWN media empire at a16z • Regular engagement on X And any founder today should do the same. Because today, a personal brand is no longer optional:

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

You need to become a thought leader. It makes you the default option for: • New customers • Investors in your niche • Top talent looking to join great companies A personal brand is this generation's most powerful asset... https://t.co/9WjrfFL9uh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Not everyone needs to be famous or build a personal brand; it's a personal choice. However, having a strong brand can significantly accelerate business growth. It allows you to attract talent who already align with your values and understand your business model, effectively pre-training your team before they join. This creates immense value. Additionally, in investment scenarios, having a well-established brand fosters trust, making negotiations smoother and more enjoyable compared to more stressful, competitive deals. Overall, the benefits of building a personal brand can enhance both team dynamics and business dealings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't think everyone should be famous. I don't think everyone should build a personal brand. I don't think everyone should anything. You can do whatever you want. And I have billionaire friends who wanna stay anonymous, and they're pretty smart dudes. I do think that from a money making perspective, it is a time warp. You can just go way faster. That is because you can attract talent at such a higher rate than you could otherwise. You can bring people on who already know your values, know what you're about, have already consumed more content than most people's employees currently know about them and their way of doing business. You can basically pre train your entire team before they come on board because of the amount of stuff that you put out. And those are just unbelievably valuable things. And not to mention if you're on the deal side, you know, like, for us, like, investing in companies, we have so much more trust at the table. It's so much better as a process having been on both types of deals, like white knuckle deals and really friendly deals. Way more fun to do friendly deals. So that's the pros.

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

This is the new playbook for influence: • Share your authentic thoughts • Build direct relationships • Skip the middlemen In the attention & AI age, a personal brand is what future-proofs your business. The best founders, like Andreessen, are already taking advantage. Will you?

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

Founders: We’ll build your personal/company brand on 𝕏 (and beyond) without you lifting a finger. To date, we've already helped 120+ founders get 3+ Billion combined views. Interested in how we can do this for you? Book your free discovery call here: form.typeform.com/to/JWuXNkxQ?ut…

@thefernandocz - Fernando Cao

Thanks for reading! A bit about me: 2 years ago, I cofounded @ThoughtleadrX — a premium personal branding agency for world-class founders, executives, and investors to dominate socials. If you enjoyed this, hit "follow" for more breakdowns! https://t.co/xb9if0YMSQ

Saved - April 2, 2025 at 11:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
SCOTUS's 2023 decision against affirmative action was seen as a victory for merit, yet many colleges continue to evade its implications. They employ "race-neutral" strategies like socioeconomic proxies and essay loopholes to maintain diversity while undermining merit. With no oversight from SCOTUS, some institutions comply while others manipulate the system. The ongoing struggle against the Left's approach to fairness raises concerns about the future of merit in America. We need to find ways to uphold these principles and counteract the subversion of DEI initiatives.

@TomKlingenstein - Tom Klingenstein

SCOTUS struck down affirmative action in ‘23, a win for merit over race. Yet woke colleges dodge it. Gleefully. Progressives today defy justice openly. Conservatives, why are we allowing ourselves to be outfoxed? 🧵 https://t.co/uF4kTbdSYA

@TomKlingenstein - Tom Klingenstein

Higher-Ed is now sidestepping anti-DEI enforcement through “race-neutral” tricks—socioeconomic proxies, essay loopholes. Where merit should rule, they cling to diversity dogma – only REBRANDED. How do we enforce SCOTUS’ intent? 2/3

@TomKlingenstein - Tom Klingenstein

After all, SCOTUS isn’t policing this—nor is anyone. Some schools appear to do the right thing, others game it. The Left’s war on fairness marches on. If we lose merit, we lose America. How do we hold the line against this subversion? Cleary, we have not defeated DEI. 3/3

Saved - April 21, 2025 at 1:43 AM

@amuse - @amuse

DEI: Over 50% of medical students are accepted based on race and gender and not merit. Most white males who are more qualified and more likely to become the best doctors are excluded from US medical schools. https://t.co/HWUNFGTwAw

Video Transcript AI Summary
A University of Texas at Austin quantitative reasoning class investigated potential discrimination in medical school admissions using data from six Texas public medical schools. The study used a statistical model to assess whether gender and race influence admissions decisions, even when controlling for academic qualifications like GPA and MCAT scores. The model revealed that race and gender have significant associations with admissions outcomes beyond academic merit. Specifically, Black/African American applicants have roughly 16 times the odds of acceptance, and Hispanic applicants have about 3.8 times the odds of acceptance compared to Asian males. White applicants have a significantly lower chance of acceptance. Females also have a 2.5 times higher chance of acceptance compared to males. These findings suggest that factors beyond GPA and MCAT scores play a role in admissions decisions. While the study does not confirm intentional discrimination, it indicates substantial differences in acceptance rates based on race and gender. The implication is that doctors are being selected on features other than competence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The data also shows Asians are shafted. Are medical schools racist? Speaker 1: Okay, this question is really, really, really important because it reflects a society that trades efficiency for equity while slowly erasing meritocracy. Speaker 0: That's what we're investigating in our quantitative reasoning class at the University of Austin, which is a core class that all of our students take. And we're focusing on probability and statistical modeling. So how do you take complex systems that kick off data, that generate data? How do you take that data and then build a model for that system? Once you have that model in place, how do you make statements or learn about that system with this simple parsimonious model? So one of the things that I love about UATX is that we can ask and we can probe provocative questions with data. And I love this because I'm a data scientist statistician by training. We're looking at never before analyzed data from six public medical schools in Texas. Gender, race, a score of situational judgment called the CASPER score, essays, all the interviews that they do, not to mention all of their academic credentials like MCAT, GPA, science GPA. So with all of that information and with the knowledge of whether or not they got in, students are going to be building a statistical model to try and assess whether or not medical schools are discriminatory. The answer is surprising and devastating. All right. So what are we doing in quantitative reasoning to try and quantify discrimination? Well, let me show you the steps that our students will be taking as they enter the final week of class. The first thing is we need to define this parameter, the main thing that we're interested in, the chance of getting into medical school. So let's call the chance of getting into medical school P. I'm going to write this out, chance of getting in. With this parameter, we're going to build a model. So the idea is that we want to take all of the other things that are measured in this data set and have those be inputs to a model that will then output a predicted chance of getting in. So the way that we do that is we're going to do a few funny things. So the first thing I want to write down is this fraction of p divided by one minuteus p. This is a chance of getting into medical school. This is a chance of getting rejected from medical school. Notice that it's one minus a probability. This is called the odds. So if you guys are familiar with gambling or with betting, this ratio of probabilities is called the odds. We're actually going to model this, but we're not going to model the odds itself. Instead, we're going to take the logarithm of the odds. Okay? We're going to take the logarithm of the odds, and we're going to write the log odds as a function of everything that I care about in terms of measuring and quantifying discrimination. So that will be, first and foremost, a coefficient beta one times gender, plus a coefficient beta two times race, plus a third piece of this function. Remember, I'm just writing down a formula here of everything else. Now what is included in everything else? Well, it could be anything that you might imagine. Test scores, MCAT, GPA, science GPA, interview transcripts, essays. All of that can be encapsulated into this final piece. And what this just says is that, well, what do I expect to influence my chances of getting into medical school? Potentially gender, potentially race, and all other merit academic essay interview based metrics. So with the specification, what we're saying is that what we believe the chance of getting into medical school should be related to gender, should be related to race, and should be related to everything else. And it seems unusual that I'm writing the log odds as what is called a linear function of these things. But what this buys me is the following formula for the chance of getting in. So the chance of getting in now is going to be just this fraction, one divided by one plus exponential negative, all of this stuff. This is called the linear predictor right here. All of this stuff. So we're gonna do beta one gender plus beta two race plus f of everything else. This is called a sigmoid function, and this is a perfect function to model probability. Why? Well, if this crazy exponential term right here gets really small, this is going to asymptote towards zero, and the probability will go to one. If this gets really, really big, that means the denominator gets really, really big and this is going to push the probability towards zero. So this function, this formula for the probability, lies between zero and one, which of course we might expect a probability should be between. So what's beautiful about this is that we can talk separately about gender's effect on the chance of getting in, race's effect on the chance of getting in, all of this other academic merit interview essay situational judgment related stuff as a function of getting into medical school. So the beautiful thing about this technology, and this is called a regression model, is that I can hold everything else fixed. I can hold everything else fixed. And I can see how gender independently changes the chance of getting in, and how race independently changes the chance of getting in. If these medical schools are indeed abiding by the Civil Rights Act, we would expect Beta one and Beta two to be exactly zero, or statistically indistinguishable from zero. If they are not, then there's potentially some dubious stuff going on. So the beauty, again, of this type of model is that we can hold everything fixed. We can fix all other credentials, all other academic qualifications at a single value and toggle between race or toggle between gender. And if we see differences in the chance of getting in, that actually is evidence of discrimination in medical school admissions. First up, Lucy and Andrew are going to talk about UT Southwestern medical school admissions. Speaker 2: Y'all take it away. All right, guys. Like Professor Pell said, Lucy and I are tasked with figuring out if there was racial or gender discrimination among University of Texas Southwestern medical school applications? Speaker 1: Okay, this question is really, really, really important because it reflects a society that trades efficiency for equity while slowly erasing meritocracy. If you think about it, you don't want your brain surgeon, your doctor who's operating on you to be someone who is selected for characteristics not based on merit. You want them to be qualified and you want them to be good at their job. So our research question is, is there racial or gender discrimination at UT Southwestern Medical School admissions? Speaker 2: So to begin, we took the data that PressRepublica provided Speaker 0: us Speaker 2: on Populi. So we took two CSV files and we brought these into our RStudio. First we had to clean and merge this data. So we merged the two CSV files together. We loaded these various libraries and then we actually cleaned the data. So as you can see in the bottom left, you have 15 race categories and some of them are repeat, some of them multiple unreported or other, you can't even use and they just skew the data. So after cleaning the data, this is what our race categories looked like. We summed it down from 15 to five and that cleaned up the whole data and made everything easier to look at. Speaker 1: So there are some raw differences as we could see between races and genders and then there are also some potential confounders. So these groups may differ naturally in their GPA, MCAT and other things and then also some other potential confounders could be rec letters, personal statements, things like that that can't be qualitatively measured and so that could possibly explain these raw gaps but we need to statistically model this with a logistic regression to see for sure. And so in our regression, included GPA, MCAT, race, and gender as predictors and our baseline category was Asian males. And so if race and gender remains significant after controlling for all these other variables like MCAT and GPA, then that suggests a potential disparity that's not explained by academic performance. And so here we did a little bit of simulating and bootstrapping. So as we can see, we broke down the different categories and then we looked at the simulated admits and the actual admits by percentages. So as we can see Asian simulated versus actual, it drops down a bit, same with white. And with Hispanic and African American, it goes up some. And with unknown and other, they stay the same, and so they're not the focus of our analysis. We're mainly looking at the groups in which the actual admits are less than they should be and the groups which the actual admits are more. Speaker 2: So our logistic regression model, we needed this model to show us all of these different numbers to look at the data from a different perspective and to see what is actually going on here. So on the left, that's our that's our code for this logistic regression model, Then the right is the actual logistic regression. And all of these are just to test whether race or gender remain significant predictors of acceptance. Speaker 1: Okay. So we have all these values. We wanted to break them down and analyze them some more and really look at what's going on here. So like I said, our question about race and gender being significant predictors of acceptance after controlling for GPA and MCAT. So holding all of that the same, we're looking at just race and gender. So the coefficients we have here are how being in each group affects the likelihood of admission compared to Asians and males, is our base category. So the coefficients are on the top right, those highlighted values, and that just shows how likely each group is to get in relative to the base population holding everything else constant. So African American, we have 2.79, Hispanic one point three three, Native American or Pacific Islander three point seven, white is negative 0.558, female is 0.917. So I highlighted the most significant groups there and that is Native American, Pacific Islander, and African American. But we also have to test for statistical significance, which is how meaningful the effect is on the outcome. So the racial groups are down here on the bottom right and then we have female, we have GPA and MCAT. So we look for a p value of less than 0.05 for this and as you can see for African American and Hispanic groups, that p value is extremely low. So we're very, very confident in our ability to predict that estimate or that, coefficient right there. And then Native American or Pacific Islander, it's also pretty low. Same with white and female is also pretty low. So GPA and MCAT are pretty low just like African American and Hispanic. So we're pretty sure GPN and CAT are very big predictors and African American and Hispanic are very big predictors as well. So we also have standard error and z value. So standard error is the measure of the variability or precision of that coefficient estimate I talked about in the last slide. And so we do have a higher standard error for African American or native American and Pacific Islander of 1.19724, which is higher than the African American or Hispanic or white groups. So that is something to keep in mind. Then also the decline to answer is a very high error. So we excluded that from the focus of the analysis as well. And with c value, that is another very interesting option that we have to look at the data. So it's a measure of how many standard deviations the group is from the mean. With a 95% confidence interval, this c value of plus or minus 1.96 is considered large. So actually all of the categories we looked at are large, but African American, Hispanic, GPA, and MCAT are exceptionally large categories, while white female and native American or Pacific Islander also play a big role as well. So we looked at which factors are significant, and that means having a dramatically high estimate for a z value or a coefficient and a valid significance level of 0.05 or less. So African American, Hispanic, Native American, Pacific Islander, female, MCAT, GPA, and white all have an effect with white having a negative effect. Speaker 2: Clearly there is something going on here. Black and African American applicants have roughly 16 times the odds. So we take the odds ratio, which is we take the 2.79, and that turns out to be 16 times the odds of acceptance, whereas Hispanic applicants also have about 3.8 times the odds of acceptance, and white applicants have significantly lower odds. They have around a 43% lower chance compared to the reference, which is an Asian male. And these differences are statistically significant and suggest that race plays a strong role in admissions decisions. And then finding on gender, again, found that there was something weird going on with gender. Females have a two and a half times higher chance of it being accepted compared to males, and that implies that beyond academic factors, gender also plays a role in admission outcomes. So the overall implication is that, yes, race and gender have significant associations with admissions outcomes. So the bottom line, the logistic regression implies that there is substantial differences in acceptance based on race and gender, and that's beyond what GP and MCAT alone explain. This does not confirm intentional discrimination, but it does show that these groups have significantly higher or lower odds of admission even after controlling for merit based qualities. Speaker 0: So the data shows that doctors are being selected on features other than competence, which means that likely they will be less competent, they won't be good surgeons, they won't be able to treat you effectively. Major problem.
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 7:14 PM

@EDSecMcMahon - Secretary Linda McMahon

Dear @Harvard: https://t.co/XmMimXfkX0

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 7:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a call for Harvard to be scrutinized. In response, it was suggested that Harvard should be investigated for its law school's ties to Protect Democracy, which allegedly played a role in legal actions against the Trump administration over the past four years.

@EDSecMcMahon - Secretary Linda McMahon

Dear @Harvard: https://t.co/XmMimXfkX0

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@EDSecMcMahon Harvard needs to be investigated for their role in the lawfare against the Trump administration through their law school’s relationship with Protect Democracy who were also involved in all of the lawfare over the last four years including elections.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“Democracy and the Rule of Law Clinic” So Harvard law school students work for Protect Democracy, one of the lawfare nonprofits that works against the will of the 77M+ Americans that voted for Trump.

Saved - June 4, 2025 at 7:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there’s a concerted effort to mislead the public regarding COVID-19 and its vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer and Moderna, which I view as dangerous. The focus on these vaccines distracts from the real issues, such as the origins of COVID-19, which I argue were funded by taxpayers. I also see troubling trends in political discourse and censorship on social media, particularly regarding immigration and ethnicity. I feel that recent executive orders blur the lines between religion and ethnicity, disenfranchising Christians, particularly white Europeans.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Commie jews are def trying to rugpull America’s middle-class for their lack of support for Israel with a bioweapon-AI one-two punch. The US tax payer funds genetic research that’s shared across all types of organizations & as is the case with COVID19/EcoHealth, used offensively.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The Trump admin’s push for AI & disbanding of the Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Long COVID speaks volumes (https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/27/long-covid-hhs-secretary-advisory-committee-disbanded-trump-rfk-jr/).

The Trump years will be grim for long Covid sufferers The disbanding of an HHS advisory committee may signal the end of federal involvement in addressing long Covid. statnews.com

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The concept of a “red herring” is that a piece of information is published to intentionally mislead or distract from a more consequential underlying information…

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The red herring, today, are COVID-19 vaccines (seemingly, mainly by Pfizer & Moderna), which make no mistake, are dangerous. Which is why they were pulled for children.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Even though these vaccines are deadly, the administration’s sole focus on them distracts from far more important and underlying information. What’s that, you might ask? Effects of COVID-19 itself, which was grafted together in a lab at expense of the US taxpayer.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

(That’s why the HHS is concerned about Skittles instead of long COVID, for example)

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Furthermore, alarming incidences of inversion and doublespeak are occurring where inverted versions of political reality are boosted on X’s “MAGA” accounts (https://thepostmillennial.com/trump-admin-approves-over-120000-h-1b-visas-for-2026-as-tech-industry-lays-off-thousands-of-us-workers).

Trump admin approves over 120,000 H-1B visas for 2026 as tech industry lays off thousands of US workers There have been 120,141 H1-B visas granted to foreign workers for 2026. thepostmillennial.com

@MAGAVoice - MAGA Voice

BREAKING 🚨 JD Vance FULLY supports President Trump taking away many Foreign Student Visas 🔥 WE DO NOT NEED FOREIGNERS TAKING A SEAT FROM AMERICANS AT THESE UNIVERSITIES PERIOD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker rejects the idea that American citizens lack the talent to excel and believes that reducing foreign student visas presents an opportunity for Americans. American higher education, particularly in biology, faces a reproducibility crisis, with many published papers being irreproducible and not representing sound science. Furthermore, these institutions are allegedly engaging in explicit racial discrimination against whites and Asians, violating the Civil Rights Act. The speaker suggests government intervention to ensure accountability, prevent civil rights violations, and ensure that federally funded science is of high quality. The speaker clarifies that this is accountability, not a war on institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This idea that American citizens don't have the talent to do great things, that you have to import a foreign class of servants and and and, professors to do these things, I just reject that. I actually think we invest in our own people. We can do a lot of good. You've heard that criticism in particular as the president has talked about cracking down on foreign student visas and their abuses, but I think that's actually an opportunity for American citizens to really flourish. Here's the second and maybe the most fundamental point, Greg. These institutions do an important job. But if you back up and look at American higher education over the past twenty or thirty years, there are a few incontrovertible facts. Number one, particularly biology, we have a terrible what's called a reproducibility crisis, meaning most of the papers that are published in biology, they don't replicate. They're not good science. So even our elite universities are not often doing good science. Second important point, these institutions, sometimes by their own admission, are engaging in explicit racial discrimination, often against whites and Asians in explicit violation of the Civil Rights Act. If the people's government can't come in given those problems and say, look, we could have some accountability here. You can't violate the civil rights act. We gotta make sure that if we're funding science with federal money, you're actually doing good science. That's called accountability. That's not going to war on these institute

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

In a most egregious and obviously anti-white move by Musk’s X, a user was suspended for receiving more likes on their post than Musk did on his pro-immigration post:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

After Musk’s X noticed this reply’s popularity greatly surpassed its own, the user was suspended. Despite nearly two-thousand X users quoting the suspended user’s post with great praise, it was censored:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

In a clearly Kabbalah-inspired set of executive orders, like the Rotary Club explains in its own foundational description, the Trump administration purposely conflated religion with ethnicity in the following Executive Orders:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The Rotary Club conflates ethnicity with religion to enable secrecy & crypto-Judaism: “The four founding members were descendants of different nationalities (American, German, Swedish and Irish), as also their religions were different (protestant, catholic and jewish).”[2]

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

1.) E.O. 14202 - Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias (Feb 6, 2025 https://archive.is/dmj5V) 2.) E.O. 14188 - Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism (Jan 29, 2025, https://archive.is/uVj0Z)

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

By “conflating” religion (Christianity) with ethnicity (semitism, Jewishness), it purposely and executively disenfranchises Christians, the majority of which are white Europeans.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Additionally, Christian (specifically Catholic) scripture specifically states they are the “chosen people” as declared in the Holy Mass of His Holiness Leo XIV with the College of Cardinals, 09.05.2025:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

“… 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗺 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻, so that we may declare the wonderful deeds of him who called us out of darkness into his marvellous light (cf. 1 Pet 2:9).” (https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2025/05/09/250509d.html)

Holy Mass of His Holiness Leo XIV with the College of Cardinals press.vatican.va

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

This fact is further supported in the historically accurate biblical studies of Bertrand L. Comparet, a native Californian, born in San Diego. He was graduated from Stanford University with the degree of Bachelor of Arts and Juris Doctor.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

https://t.co/BZbCcGpWmo

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

In 1976, Bertrand writes in “Your Heritage”: “The word "Semitic" is derived from the patriarch Shem, & is correctly applied to people descended from him. All true Israelites […] are therefore Semites; & today these are the great White Christian nations of the Western World.” https://t.co/aWiMkZagSw

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

https://t.co/bKesjCBvVV

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

I would truly love to see @Pontifex make a statement about this. Let it be known—awareness on this particular issue will absolutely positively be raised, regardless of censorship on social media platforms so obviously infiltrated by nefarious influence and intelligence actors.

Saved - July 31, 2025 at 3:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question the idea that highly intelligent people struggle to fit into society. Bobby Fischer, a chess genius with an IQ over 180, became a recluse and developed paranoia, making disturbing statements before his death in Iceland. Despite his brilliance, he was consumed by his own issues. On another note, I share that I'm a YC-backed founder with a coaching business generating $1 million monthly. However, I critique Y Combinator as a gatekeeping entity in Silicon Valley, suggesting it operates under the influence of various powerful groups. What a time to be alive.

@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya

“I dOn’T bElIeVe HiGh Iq PeOpLe AcTuAlLy HaVe TrOuBlE fItTiNg InTo SociEtY.” -Some retardanon “Bobby Fischer was the most insane chess player in history… His IQ? Over 180.” “During those 20 years, Fischer: •Became a recluse •Developed extreme paranoia •Made horrific antisemitic statements Iceland finally granted him citizenship in 2005. He died there in 2008, convinced the world was run by conspiracies. The greatest chess mind ever got destroyed by his own demons.” -Terry Kim, NexGenT ALSO TERRY KIM, NEXGENT… “A bit about me: I’m a YC-backed founder, and my coaching business now makes $1m/month.” 🚨NOTE: Y Combinator is the gatekeeping apparatus in Silicon Valley run by Jews (American and Israeli) and their CCP co-investors/founders, where Tech founders have to “kiss the ring” to make it as a startup, while managing to not have their IP stolen outright by the Unit 8200, Bilderberg, PayPal Mafia, Kleiner Perkins and CIA Jews who run it. (Sam Altman is/was the President of YC.) What a motherfucking time to be alive, folks.🤣

@clintjackson - Clint Jackson

@projectkim "Destroyed by his own demons" Because he was "Convinced the world was run by conspiracies" Sounds like he was perfectly sane.

Saved - August 10, 2025 at 1:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel strongly that prioritizing non-Whites in STEM education and employment is unjust. Back in my day, competition wasn't skewed by what I see as unfair DEI practices that favor certain groups over others. It seems like things have changed for the worse.

@AedmarSkyjarn - Aedmar Skýjárn

Anyone who incentivizes non-Whites over Whites for STEM education and employment should be herded into the sun with extreme prejudice. When this retarded boomer went to school and was hired, he didn't have to compete with endless third world trash because, at that time, universities and employers weren't forced to engage in judaized anti-White DEI practices.

Saved - October 1, 2025 at 2:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been discussing the alleged involvement of major companies like Verizon, Cognizant, and Sun Microsystems in what I see as a fraudulent H1B visa system that discriminates against white, non-Jewish American men. I believe these companies, along with others, are part of a network that excludes qualified Americans from job opportunities and university admissions. I also point out the connections to various organizations and individuals I consider complicit in this issue, highlighting a broader concern about socioeconomic impacts on American citizens.

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

*VERIZON, AIG, ALIBABA, APOLLO, IBM, SUN MICROSYSTEMS, MICROSOFT, COGNIZANT, ERICSSON, PAYPAL, BNY MELLON, HAKLUYT, PALANTIR, MOSSAD, UNIT 8200* They’re the FOUNDATION of the JEWISH H1B FRAUD RACKET being run vs WHITE, NON-JEW AMERICAN MEN. (Jeffrey Greenberg. Ivan Seidenberg.) https://t.co/QgDflzOlfu

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

H1B FRAUD AT HIDDEN RIDGE APTS? Oh, you mean VERIZON? That’s Jacob & Marcus Wallenberg, two 9/11 accomplices from INVESTOR AB, ERICSSON, ALIBABA and EQT. They even put PayPal President & CEO Dan Schulman on Verizon’s Board. Jacob is on the Atlantic Council Int’l Advisory Board. https://t.co/KFcQyD1P17

@mangolassi93 - newyorker093

@VBierschwale @KumarXclusive @EngineerChiefCE @USTechWorkers @vee14102 @AtlasGemini @realmattforney @USCIS @USDOL @CivilRights @ICEgov @StateDept @AAGDhillon @SecRubio @StephenM Hidden Ridge Apts in Irving TX is listed as a work location for many H1B roles. Please investigate

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

*staple* *staple*

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

Ah, Cognizant, you say? One of the worst violators of the H1b VISA SYSTEM in America? Gosh, it’s a shame that COGNIZANT is literally ALL 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATORS from PAYPAL, QUALCOMM, MOSSAD, GCHQ, DELOITTE, TRILATERAL COMMISSION, IBM, GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION, USISPF & AIG. https://t.co/zDdr14JFTj

@SanDiegoKnight - Hany Girgis

Why do we let companies caught red-handed keep abusing the H-1B system? FACTS: • Meta fined $4.75M for denying U.S. workers roles. • Apple fined $25M for discrimination. • Microsoft pays 82% of foreign hires below market. • Cognizant petitioned for 52,000+ visas, found

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

*staple* *staple*

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

*SUN MICROSYSTEMS & H1B FRAUD* “AC21 was bipartisan… backed by BigTech players like Sun Microsystems and Microsoft.” Oh, look… SUN MICROSYSTEMS started the H1B FRAUD RACKET TOO! Classic Mossad! https://t.co/mXaoodbWOv

@War4theWest - War for the West

🤔🤔 Today's Deeper Dive: The SCOTUS Case That Could Redefine U.S. Tech Immigration Policy 1. SCOTUS is weighing whether to hear an appeal in Save USA Jobs v. DHS—a case challenging work permits (H4-EAD) for the spouses of H-1B visa holders. The outcome could shake U.S. tech and

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

PS: Plug this thread into your trusty little Jew/Jeet “I’m smrt!” calculator, fgt.🖕🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/Q5jIkJYlGH

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

We are. And you’re terrified of us. Which is why Jews and Indians invest in platforms like FORAGE to ILLEGALLY EXCLUDE WHITE AMERICANS FROM KEY HIRING OPPORTUNITIES AND UNIVERSITY ENROLLMENTS… as PAYPAL/VERIZON/COGNIZANT 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATORS EXPLOIT H1B PROGRAMS DELIBERATELY.🖕

@tszzl - roon

let's say americans are the best people on earth, and produce ten times more geniuses than any other population (genius here doesn't have to mean intelligence, it could be some combination of traits you like) americans are 4.1% of the world's population, and so even under these

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

Receipts are fun as fuck.🖕

@JobsNowPaper - Expose H1B Fraud

This exposes how the Indian H-1B syndicate actively discriminates against qualified Americans in their own country. They are brazenly blacklisting U.S. citizens to preserve a closed H1B network that hires only from their own. Because GC and citizens are active threat to their job https://t.co/q3U7FtY3eJ

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

USISPF

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

*U.S.-INDIA STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP FORUM* 🚨USISPF: Hugely involved with the H1B VISA FRAUD designed to socioeconomically genocide WHITE NON-JEW AMERICANS IN THEIR OWN FUCKING COUNTRY. What else do you Notice™️? https://t.co/iaI8Rdb6t7

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

@AnnaGorisch

@StaceyLynne_0 - JClynne

No, Georgetown “lolyer” cunt. Don’t even fucking try it. We both know you don’t wanna go this route, @AnnaGorisch. https://t.co/z8VIiQ4PWA

@AnnaGorisch - Anna K. Gorisch

Sometimes the hate is nonsensical. It looks like he just highlighted the apartment column??

View Full Interactive Feed