reSee.it - Related Post Feed

PunishDem1776
Posted - February 9, 2020 at 5:49 PM
Saved - July 23, 2023 at 3:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The War on Humanity: Who is the Enemy? Part 3. The raid on Bin Laden's bunker was meant to explain the war, but was it really the truth? Seal Team 6's odd coincidence of being blown up after dumping the highest target into the ocean raises questions. Bin Laden's death was concealed, perhaps for political gain. The 9/11 hijackers' lack of flight skills is suspicious. We've been deceived about wars throughout history, benefiting a select few. Victims of these crimes demand justice. We must unite, awaken others, and understand the stakes. #WWG1WGA

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

The War on Humanity Who is the Enemy Part 3 911 continued.. So if the largest/highest terrorists target in the world were to be captured/killed, would that not be a sevear significance to explain the war and/or evidence? We were "told" BL bunker was raided.

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Seal team 6 dump the "highest" target in the last century into the ocean? Then seal team 6 gets blown by "forces", seems like an odd coincidence, that's because it is! Bin laden died many weeks before the invasion of his camp due to kidney failure ...

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Which real death certificates can support that. But if Bin laden was already dead, why keep it from the public? At the end of Barrack Obama (Barry soetoro) 2nd term, polls show a massive displease within America, and Barry soetoro needed a way to come back..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

From a failed Presidency, so Bin laden was kept on ice as a frozen patsy when needed for political gain. They want you to believe one man in a cave really did this to America, so let's talk about the pilots. The "so called" hi jackers most of who couldn't..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Land a crop dusting plane and failed at all flight schools apparently and suddenly became masters at flying a 747 into precise accuracy, even though they couldn't land a private plane. So what was gained from 911? Before we went into war, the plan..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Was already set. For centuries you have been lied to about every war in our history slaughtering millions of lives, destroying countries and the suffering of billions in the aftermath all for to further enrich and empower a select few higher..

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Oligarchs who have controlled the course of history aided by tyrannical leaders in Secret Societies. These evil acts will not be forgotten by the victims of these horrible crimes against humanity. We are at a critical moment in our history, now its our turn.

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Everything you were told was a lie! We must be United! We must wake up others! We must know what's at stake! And We MUST know the enemy! WWG1WGA

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

@taylor7_r Exactly

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

@LindsayBlake @threadreaderapp It wont do it 🤔

Birikina_7
Posted - September 3, 2022 at 7:55 AM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 10:15 AM

@Birikina_7 - Birikina

Wake up people🙏👿 https://t.co/bM6PzrFmoz

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've ignored the truth for too long, but it's time to face it. There's something suspicious happening, yet we choose to ignore it. The news reports it, and we just accept it without questioning. We're expected to conform and follow their perspective, but I have many unanswered questions. How can children be molested without anyone being held accountable? It's written in the testament that these children are not protected, so I'm fighting back.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been dancing with the devil way too long. I know the truth is hard to swallow, just digest it. Suspecting something's going on, but chose to just neglect. Reflected by some breaking news, oh, we just accepted. Expected just to fall in line and follow their perspective. No question, they're objective. But I got a lot the questions. How these kids molested but nobody's been arrested? Read it in the testament. These children aren't protected, so I'm fighting
KAGdrogo
Posted - May 4, 2023 at 6:45 PM
Saved - June 27, 2023 at 7:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump's 5GW strategy for the vaccine rollout prevented the Great Reset's implementation. Speaking out against the vaccine would give the cabal justification to manipulate flu/covid cases and try for a bigger lockdown. Trump's quick vaccine release ended tyrannical governors' excuse for lockdowns and removed their cover for the Great Reset with a destroyed economy. Trump's presidency is a military operation to take down the NWO. Trump reposting comments about FEMA camps is a big deal. God bless the Trump admin 5GW operation and may the New World Order be obliterated.

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

It shouldn't be very difficult at this point to consider the #5GW strategy of Trump's approach to the vaccine roll out. Rushing it out is exactly what stopped the great reset's full implementation. Speaking out on the vax injuries would give them the perfect justification to manipulate the flu/"covid" cases again and try for a bigger and longer lockdown. Trump speaking out against the vax would be the dumbest strategy at this stage and the instant gratification would be insignificant compared to the fatal countermove it would give to the cabal. It would completely compromise the 5GW strategy with warpspeed - which is exactly what stopped their depopulation fema camp end game agenda. Some people don't even understand the bullet we dodged thanks to @realDonaldTrump He is a hero. The fact we can sit here and talk about this today, while not in a fema camp, is a testament to the success of Trump's strategy. Most of the doomers I know only just recently found out about the New World Order so they aren't able to see as easily how Trump is already stopping the "great" reset. Those of us that have known about the NWO for over a decade feel a great sense of relief at the way things have played out. If it wasn't for Trump, we’d already be in the camps. Their scamdemic narrative is completely obliterated and that was their BIG PLAN for world government. The People are AWAKE. They will never be able to do this again. Look around you, their scamdemic plan has been CRUSHED. “Emergency” officially ended. They are running multiple back up plans at once and are increasingly desperate. Trump stopped the New World Order with warpspeed. That’s right. Right now [they] are trashing around in their dying breaths of panic. Many people have no idea how bad the scamdemic was supposed to be. The defiant ones were supposed to already be depopulated. Their great reset into eating bugs, sleeping in pods in the 15 minute city, tracked with barcode tattoos, social credit scores and CBDC was meant for the sheep who survived AFTER the defiant had been disappeared. By Trump releasing the vax quickly, it ended tyrannical Governors’ excuse for lockdowns and removed their cover for the great reset with a destroyed economy. We know he already ended their wars and removed the camouflage that would have given them. It also forced them to release a vax under EUA that CANNOT be forcibly mandated, try as they did. That’s why they had to use incentives. It forced them to rush their agenda, which makes it way more visible than their usual slow incremental boiling water tactics, making so many mistakes and exposing themselves in the process. We all know every single time the vax is mentioned, President Trump emphasizes freedom of choice- he’s said no one should be forced and we have our freedoms. He says this repeatedly, every time, without exception. Every single time. He’s always been outspoken against mandates. Most people don’t even realize how huge that was. (Every President before was lockstep with the uniparty pushing the new world order and all pushed mandates.) He’s already said no kids should take it. We all know that all the face diaper parents would have injected their kids with rNA GMOs no matter what Trump said. If President Trump were to speak up about the injuries- they could seize on that opportunity with the countermove of locking us down again and blaming the injuries on Trump rushing the vax. Just look what they did when he mentioned HCQ- We’d hear an all out media tirade about how the injuries are Trump’s fault because he rushed it and if it wasn’t for him they’d be “safe and effective.” Not to mention, they’d leverage the Trump derangement syndrome they’ve created and associate ANY criticism of the injection agenda as “just a Trump supporter thing.” By removing himself from the equation, they didn’t have that card to play, even though they still try, it’s uniting people across the spectrum. By not saying anything, he’s forcing them into showing their hand to the entire world while it wakes up average everyday people everywhere. 15 years ago when I used to try and tell people there was a nefarious plan to fake a pandemic in order to force vaccinate (depopulate) the world and implement a totalitarian world government for the survivors — people thought I was crazy. Today this has become common knowledge. Trump has destroyed the media’s credibility and woken up regular people everywhere. As tragic as this is, with all the vax injuries and deaths, it’s the best possible timeline and way better than it would have been — which was everyone being forcibly vaccinated against their will without a choice. Trump gave us the choice to peacefully refuse without having to fight or run. The way that I and many folks were expecting this to happen 15 years ago, when we all thought they were going to make their big move with “swine flu” — was them going door to door to force this thing into people with the enforcement of the police and if you didn’t take it you’d be put on a bus and carted off to a quarantine camp, never to be heard from again. Don’t believe me? Look at China and Australia. That’s just not happening and there’s no way it can at this point- not only we’re they forced to end the scamdemic but now way too many people are awake worldwide. If it weren’t for Trump, they’d have already been rounding people up into fema camps and we would have long since lost National sovereignty to the totalitarian global government New World Order, now called the “Great Reset.” Warpspeed stopped that. When he says it saved millions of lives it’s because it DID - from the death camps. Now he is going to completely obliterated the deepstate. Watch what happens next. #TRUMP2024 #TrumpIsTheOnlyChoice https://truthsocial.com/@kagdrogo/109717329631536809…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump's quick release of vaccines eliminated the excuse for lockdowns, preventing the transfer of wealth from small businesses to large corporations. The vaccines also removed the need for lockdowns, forcing Democratic governors to reopen. Releasing the vaccines under emergency use authorization (EUA) prevented them from being legally forced on people. The original plan was to physically force vaccinations and quarantine those who refused, but the EUA made that impossible. The only FDA-approved vaccine is called Comirnaty, but it is not available in the US yet.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By Trump releasing the vaccines at warp speed, by rushing them out really fat really quickly, what it did is it ended their excuse for the lockdowns. You know, you have Fauci talking about, oh, we're gonna have to stay locked down. It's gonna be, you know, at least 5 years till we get a vaccine. That would have completely solidified the transfer of wealth that would have happen from a destroyed economy where they're, you know, destroying small businesses, transferring the wealth to giant corporations, and, you know, completely destroying the economy to the point where That would have given them the camouflage needed for the great reset where even the sheep would be begging for a great reset. Like, please let me know nothing and be happy. We need a nanny state. You know? If if they would have completely destroyed the economy, that would have been that that would have been the nail in the coffin. They they they would have had the camouflage they needed to to have the great reset. And, of course, he already took away the war that they would've wanted because the war also destroys economy, and that would've given them more camouflage for a great reset. So they would've wanted the war, but he took that from them by ending the wars. And then by rushing out the vaccines, it removed their excuse for the lockdowns because, hey. If the vaccine works, then why do you have to be locked down? So all those tyrannical, Democratic governors that were locking Slow down had to reluctantly open back up because Mhmm. They they they're they put them in a in a tough position because it's like, You I know you wanna be locked down, but you're all gonna say those vaccines work. So if they work, you gotta open up. So they had to do that. And the other thing is by him releasing it at warp speed so quickly, It made it so they had to release it under emergency youth authorization, under EUA, which is obviously dangerous, but what it did is it made it so it cannot be physically forced legally. No no matter how much they try it. Like, look. The way this was supposed to happen, you know, 14 years ago when I first learned about it is they were gonna go door to door and physically forced it on you at one point. And if you didn't take it, then you would take be taken to a quarantine camp and never heard from again. So by them doing that, By him by him rushing it out, it made it under EUA, so they can't even legally try to say, oh, it's FDA approved. We can now, you know, force it on you. The only FDA approved one is in Europe. It's called Comirnaty. They they actually don't have it here still.

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

Like I said, the way this was supposed to originally play out was they were going to go door to door and force it at gunpoint with police enforcement. If you didn't take it you'd be thrown on a bus, taken to a quarantine camp, never to be heard from again. If you don't believe me, in 2008, they already passed a law saying just this in Massachusetts. I remember watching in horror as the news of this law played on MSNBC. The. The Boston marathon bombing marshal law was a dry run for this exact scenario, and no one did a damn thing, it was a successful test of obedience. Now the people are awake and it's over for them. Their big plan for the New World Order is destroyed and they are scrambling, just circling the drain into this big beautiful trap. If you haven’t figured it out yet, Trump’s entire presidency is a military operation to take down the NWO. https://youtu.be/0A5vfyFyptQ

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

Trump acknowledged these truths when he reposted my comments about exactly this, and why Desantis is NOT our guy. #TRUMP2024 #TrumpIsYheOnlyChoice https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2021/2006/

Senate Bill 2006 (2021) - The Florida Senate flsenate.gov

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

I’m not sure if everyone appreciates the magnitude of Trump reposting comments about fema camps It’s a big deal. #TRUMP2024

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

God bless the Trump admin #5GW operation and may the New World Order be dragged back into the depths of hell from where it came. 🙏🇺🇸 #WWG1WGA

@KAGdrogo - ₭₳₲ ĐⱤØ₲Ø ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ɄⱠ₮Ɽ₳2ℚℚℚ🇺🇸

*obliterate the deepstate

AAnon55
Posted - May 6, 2023 at 4:28 PM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 5:59 AM

@AAnon55 - 𝙰 𝙰𝚗𝚘𝚗

Colonel Phil Waldron Retired US Army Information Warfare Specialist Col Waldron confirms that We The People are fighting an information war. Don't take these warnings lightly. This is information warfare! -- You are part of the army. Mission forward. https://t.co/g2uhl2SwlJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a military background starting as an air cavalry officer and later transitioning into information warfare. I specialize in psychological operations, computer network operations, deception, operation security, electronic warfare, and special electronic warfare. From my perspective as an unconventional warfare specialist, I believe the American people are currently experiencing an unconventional warfare situation. This can be classified as information warfare.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My background in the military, let's start off my career as an air cavalry officer, flying moved, later into information warfare as a as a information Operations Officer, running psychological operations, computer network operations, deception, operation security and electronic warfare, special electronic warfare. And I would tell you as a As an unconventional warfare, information operations, information warfare specialist. The American populace is facing an unconventional warfare scenario. This is this is information warfare.
GenFlynn
Posted - July 8, 2023 at 11:24 PM
Saved - July 9, 2023 at 12:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
General Flynn shared a video discussing the consequences of engaging in politics, highlighting the importance of understanding the challenges faced in fifth generation warfare. He believes that more Americans are becoming aware of these issues and the need to confront them.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This guy makes some really excellent points here. When I hear these type diatribes, I know more and more Americans are getting it and are starting to understand what we’re up against. Fifth generation warfare is different. It is designed to be different. But so are the consequences. This video describes some interesting ideas for those consequences of getting into politics. https://t.co/dQJG7h1hBL

@Sentinel2NO - ŞϵŋƫĩŋϵⱢ ƻ.0 🇺🇲

Definitely a Game Changer.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests turning the government's surveillance system back on them to fix the country. They propose tracking politicians' every move, including meetings with lobbyists and visits to corporate headquarters. They advocate for penalties and fines for unauthorized devices, as well as recording and publishing all conversations between politicians and lobbyists. They also call for investigating the sources of politicians' money and punishing those who profit from insider knowledge. The speaker proposes politicians wearing body cameras to monitor their actions. They argue that politicians are unreliable and corrupt, committing more crimes than any other group. They question why tax dollars are used to surveil citizens instead of holding politicians accountable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nation, I think there's one thing we can do that might just fix the entire country. I think we need to take the monolithic surveillance system the government has constructed around us and turn it back on them. We know who the criminals are, so why aren't we watching them instead of them watching us? The government tracks our location. I wanna track their location. I wanna know every slimeball lobbyist they meet with and every corporate headquarters they visit. Every device they have should be tracked. Every email and message they send, read. Unapproved devices should incur, shall we say, a penalty of 1 year in jail and a $10,000,000 fine. Make pansy little penalties, and corruption runs rife. No outside or unmonitored devices allowed, period. That should be the law for all elected officials. I wanna know everything a lobbyist ever says to them in person or in writing, record it, and put online. If you deposit large sums of money, you have to prove where it came from. I want documented sources for every dollar politicians receive investigated by independent sources. I want profiting off of knowledge of upcoming bills or national intelligence briefings to be punishable at the highest extreme of insider trading laws, jail, and penalties in multiples of the illegal gains, and then exclusion from government positions or any that might interact with the government forever. These are serious crimes, and it should go even further than we might imagine. The police have body cameras. I think politicians should have body cameras. We need to know every place they go, every person they talk to in everything they do. They have proven in every instance to be absolutely unreliable and corrupt. There is no other identifiable group of people in this a nation in which 50% of them have committed or will commit crimes, and the other 50%, we just haven't found out about yet. No group commits more crimes per capita than politicians. So why on earth do we let the most power hungry, corrupt people use our tax dollars to construct surveillance systems that cost in the 100 of 1,000,000,000 to watch our social media, Our email, our messages, our phone calls, our locations, our everything. We need a surveillance state against the state, not against the people.
GenFlynn
Posted - October 25, 2023 at 2:00 AM
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 5:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Citizen journalism dominates the information domain, with digital soldiers like @boonecutler, @realflynnpac, @LauraLoomer, @JamesOKeefeIII, @briangamble_v1, @Crux41507251, and @laralogan. These warriors fearlessly pursue the truth, regardless of the cost. The future is here.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Citizen journalism is the next future dominating the information domain and that future has arrived. These digital soldiers are the new warriors of the modern information battlespace getting to the truth, no matter the cost. @boonecutler @realflynnpac @LauraLoomer @JamesOKeefeIII @briangamble_v1 @Crux41507251 @laralogan

WWG1WGADS2
Posted - November 8, 2023 at 12:34 PM
Saved - November 8, 2023 at 1:52 PM

@WWG1WGADS2 - 👊DIGI👊SOLDIER⭐️⭐️⭐️

Our country is going to H3LL @GenFlynn @realmflynnJR We have TO fight locally for national impact #FLFNI https://t.co/FC6Sno2cmx

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm deeply upset that the sacrifices we made and the lives lost are being disregarded. Our country is deteriorating, and it's not the same as it was when I was growing up. The opportunities and joy I experienced are no longer available to the younger generation. This situation is not what our fallen heroes fought for.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm so upset that the things we did and the things we fought for and the boys that died for us. It's all going down the drain. Our country's going to hell in a handbasket. We haven't got the country we had when I was raised. Not at all. Nobody will have the fun I had. Us. Nobody will have the opportunity I had. This is just not the same. That's not what our boys That's not what they died for.
AllBiteNoBark88
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 1:16 AM
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 4:01 AM

@AllBiteNoBark88 - The White Rabbit Podcast 🐰

MILITARY LISTEN UP WHO & WHAT ARE YOU NOW DEFENDING? https://t.co/SV3xR7deXP

Video Transcript AI Summary
To the military personnel worldwide, especially in the Five Eyes Nations, I have received truthful information that led to my social media accounts being shut down. But who are you really fighting for? Wars were never about loyalty to the country. The great awakening has revealed the horrifying truth that the mainstream media hides. You would be defending corrupt bankers, communists, and those who have destroyed our lives. These people start wars but never risk their own lives or their loved ones'. I urge you to protect your family, especially children, and remove them from being used as pawns in the greedy fraudsters' genocidal plans.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have a message, to the guys and girls in the military around the globe, but particularly in the Five Eyes Nations. Some of you have shared information with me over the last 3 years that were so truthful and real That I watch my social medias fall like dominoes. Boom boom boom. YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Spotify gone. Cancelled. Nicola Charles. Had to come back as the white rabbit, and who knows how long I'll be around as the white rabbit because I'm tiring of their games. But who is it exactly you'd be going to fight for? Were wars ever about queen and country? I doubt it. Now, Looking back with fresh eyes. But the great awakening is upon us and though some people are still living in that giant city called denial, the rest of us have left The city of denial. And we're faced with the true, real horror of what's going on. A horror you won't see on the mainstream media because they're selling you story time for 5 year olds. Now what you'd be defending are banksters and fraudsters, Communists, Marxists, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and their assets globally. And they're happy to use you as fodder. You'd be defending medical tyranny and all of the things that have destroyed our lives over the last 3 years. But here's a really important point, aside from the fact that I don't think us, The innocents in the 99% should be used as cannon fodder. The really important thing about these monstrous people is that though they may start these wars, cause these wars, engineer these wars, agitate these wars, They themselves and their children and their loved ones never go to war. My advice to you if you're in the military or you have family, particularly children, in the military is get them out. Don't let them be used as cannon fodder so that these greedy fraudsters can continue on with their genocidal plot.
DrLoupis
Posted - November 12, 2023 at 12:34 AM
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 3:31 AM

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

The world🌍 has had ENOUGH of US war crimes!🇺🇸 It’s going DOWN - be sure to stand on the RIGHT SIDE of history🔥 https://t.co/NAq9plBRaI

Thekeksociety
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 1:08 AM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 2:25 AM

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

AR E A L L WARS ORCHESTRATED? WELCOME TO THE 5TH GENERATION P S Y W A R Credit: Truth Stream Media https://t.co/D4t71whPua

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker apologizes for the scattered nature of the video and expresses their concern about the current state of affairs, particularly the march towards World War 3. They discuss the movie "Wag the Dog" and its relevance to current events, highlighting the use of fabricated wars to distract from scandals. The speaker mentions the use of atrocity propaganda by the Israeli government on social media and the manipulation of public opinion through deepfake technology. They also touch on the concept of 5th generation warfare, where wars are fought in the minds of everyday citizens. The speaker concludes by urging people to be aware of the manipulation and to cherish their loved ones.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sorry if this video is all over the place. I just wanna start out by apologizing. Speaker 1: I've been Pretty upset at what's been happening in the last couple weeks. My heart is broken for people. And for the fact that this lockstep march towards World War 3 is pretty much been in the works for Decade since before I was born, so, you know, but I think you need to see What I'm about to show you in this video, I think everyone needs to see this so that we can understand the level that things are at, because I don't I really, really don't think people do. I didn't, and I've been on this topic for years years, And I don't think that I even understood what I'm about to talk about in this video, so So let's start let's go back for a second. The late nineties was one of the best times for films coming out in my lifetime, I feel like. I mean, there's a lot of great movies that came out before I was born for sure, and the eighties had some some wonderful stuff too. But the late nineties, we had The Truman Show, we had The Matrix, we had Eyes Wide Shut, we had movies that were getting down to the core of something very very deep that was attempting to be communicated through the medium of film. But one that doesn't really make a lot of people's lists, I think, as often is the 1997 movie Wag the Dog, which if you haven't seen it, I'm about to spoil the plot for you, but it's not gonna spoil the movie, you should go watch it if you haven't seen it. It stars Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro, And they are spin doctors who completely fabricate a war in Albania in order to distract voters from a presidential sex scandal. So the whole point of making a fake war is to distract people from a sex scandal, which is really ironic considering that this movie came out 1 month before the Bill Clinton Monica Lewinsky sex scandal broke. Speaker 2: The president speaks forcefully with his most emphatic denial yet. I did not have sexual relations with that woman. Speaker 1: And then the Clinton administration subsequently bombed a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. Speaker 2: It depends upon what the meaning of the word is. Yeah. Speaker 1: Or you could say it's really ironic because During the president's impeachment trial over the Monica Lewinsky sex scandals when the Clinton administration decided to start a bombing campaign in Iraq. Speaker 2: Indeed, I did have a relationship with miss Lewinsky that was not appropriate. Speaker 1: Or you could say it's really ironic because The Clinton administration's spring 1999 intervention in the Kosovo War involved a bombing campaign in Yugoslavia, which is a place that bordered Albania where Albanians actually lived. But anyway, there's a scene in this movie Wag the Dog where Kirsten Dunst is made to look like she's fleeing this Albanian war zone, which is all being done on a soundstage. She's on a blue screen, and she's carrying this bag of corn chips and they actually edit it out to make it into a cat, like she's escaping the war zone with her pet cat. And they fabricate this entire scene, sound effects and everything. Speaker 2: Screaming's good. Some sound of screaming. Speaker 1: And then they send it off to the news to get reported on the news so that people will focus on something that's not the president's sex scandal. And they go through the whole scene of completely straight fabricating this war, and then they toss it on the news for people to Suck that right up and believe it. And I'm sure there's people who watched this movie at the time and thought to themselves, nah, they would never do something like That in actual reality, lot of that about like probably someone thought that, I don't know why anyone would think that at this point but maybe somebody did. And I got attacked instantly for urging calm because as immediately As the news broke, instantly, we were being told one narrative of what we should think about that and what we feel about that, and that one narrative was coming out of governments and the mainstream media, and it was all pretty lockstep, Exactly how to think and feel, and immediately people started taking sides and fighting with each other because that's what always happens. And I said, maybe you wanna watch Wag the Dog and then come back to this before you Instantly start jumping on this one narrative, one lockstep narrative that was coming out of garments and mainstream media. Maybe you just wanna wait since that's exactly what happened on 9/11. It's the exact same type of, In fact, the similarities, I wrote a whole thread on x about the similarities, and it's it's crazy. It's crazy how many things have been exactly the same. And we didn't know exactly what was going on. Just saying we don't know exactly what was going on the moment that everything happened, And that maybe we should wait before everyone just starts screaming and fighting with each other and jumping on the one set of approved facts that everyone's been told, shown time and time and time and time again that that is not what's actually going on. We've been shown that, and and just saying that I got attacked everywhere by everyone on all sides. Just it didn't matter to say anything rational or logical at that moment, and what we do know is horrible. It's so horrible. Speaker 3: You say, does that mean starve the Palestinian people? Continue to Because they will be so hungry and will be so desperate for water and medicine that then they will give up hamas? Speaker 2: It sounds callous, but, I mean, this is a war. Speaker 1: But that's a whole different discussion that really can't be had on this platform. Those are discussions we have on other platforms that are actually supportive of true free speech. That's not what this is. This is a platform where only some people get to say whatever they want, but we aren't those people. So but I'm pretty sure, and by now you've probably heard, that Our governments here in the west all seem to be in lockstep towards World War 3 doing every checking every box off the list they possibly can to ensure that that's where We're all headed. Speaker 2: My warning to the Ayatollah was that if they continue to move against those troops, we will respond, And he should be prepared. It has nothing to do with Israel. Speaker 1: And I don't think it's hyperbole at all to say That the war unfolding in the Middle East right now is unlike anything any of us who are alive right now, any of you who are listening to my voice is unlike anything any of us have ever witnessed in our lifetimes literally ever because we have never lived through a full blown war in the era of burgeoning AI and deep fake technology, and full blown social media networks like what we have now. The phrase atrocity propaganda has come up a lot lately. You know, back during World War one, the British had these cartoons drawn up of German soldiers bayoneting children and stuff like that, but they were cartoons. It wasn't true. It was just a way to get the public to support the war effort. But today, that's not the case at all. Today, You have the Foreign Affairs Ministry of Israel paying for targeted ads on social media and YouTube, which are directly being projected to people without they no one's asking to see this. No one's saying, I hope I, You know, I hope I come on to YouTube today to watch, you know, the latest Taylor Swift video or something, and maybe Israeli foreign affairs ministry can beam atrocity propaganda directly into my brain or the brains of my children, but that is what is happening right now. Because they have spent 1,000,000 of over $7,000,000 in the last 2 weeks alone to target over a 1000000000 impressions of Multiple different ads, some of which are extremely graphic, some of which are just super freaking twisted like this one right here is called Babies can't read the text in this video, but their parents can. If you're triggered by words about bad things happening, you're gonna be triggered by this video, But it looks like something that's very inviting for super small children to watch because it has, you know, cartoon unicorns flying around and rainbows and all this stuff, And then it talks about murdered infants by terrorists. Speaker 4: What the fuck? Speaker 1: And how they're gonna do everything to protect their kids, so you should support them. She's right into the brains of people. This is getting sent, and there's way worse ones than this. I'm not gonna show them for obvious reasons, but There's a whole article in Politico breaking down how Israel has completely flooded social media to try and shape really the west. It's really targeted at France, Germany, the UK, the United States, Belgium, The Hague. They've been targeting The Hague. I wonder why. With dozens of online ads, some of them very graphic, to try and get people to support this war, they're barraging people with these things, and it says down here that a spokesperson for Israel's mission to the EU said we would never post such graphic things before, but this is something that is not part of our culture. We have a lot of respect for the deceased, adding the war is not only on the ground Because the war, first and foremost, is in everybody's minds. That is where the war right now is being waged. It's in everybody's heads. 1st and foremost, literally before anything else that is actually occurring. And so, by the way, my child could have read that. I have I had kids who could read full sentences by the age of 2, so I'm pretty sure lots of people's children could actually read that and be completely traumatized by it. So the answer is horrible things happen to our children. We're gonna do horrible things to yours. I don't understand why this is okay, by the way. It's so it's putting it right into the minds of people, right into people's heads. And that's fine, by the way. This video? Totally fine for them to put this video up. Not a problem to have a foreign affairs ministry directly putting atrocity propaganda into the minds of people during an ongoing war, and that's okay. But we get censored for saying way, way less inflammatory stuff than this. Speaker 5: Google removed 30 ads from this account with horrifying images after political reached out to Google for comment. I have to say that in the past week doing my investigation I've seen videos with Very graphic content appear and get monetized. Speaker 1: They've spent 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars to try and manufacture consent for what is now happening in Gaza. That's a thing. They're posting things where they they, in text, they describe heinous, graphic, disgusting things, and then they say, but we can't show you because we're not allowed to show it to you even though they literally just told it to you and left it to you to imagine it for yourself. And I just wanna point out right now that we are the kinds of mind war Psychological operations that are taking place on the population right now, on populations all over this world, on the people of this world, That is not something we have ever been subjected to up until this point. It has kicked into a new stage. This is the era of deepfakes. This is the era of AI. This is the era of not being able to verify anything except through a government telling you this is real, which really is just you having to trust that garment. It's not you being able to independently verify if these things are real or not, And that goes for all sides of this conflict, that goes for all sides of everything that's happening ever since these tools have been released into our society, into our modern human society. We don't know. As much as it's outrageous and upsetting and horrifying, and It makes me extremely emotional because I don't I don't want this war. I don't want any more war. I've lived my entire life In a world where there has never been a time where my country has not been at some kind of war, they might not have called it a war. That doesn't mean people weren't dying. It's still war. I don't care what you call it. And, and now we have reports like this one out of the Times of Israel. News outlets have been receiving hundreds of videos from both sides of this conflict that are completely fake. So this came out in the times of Israel not even a week ago, and it's talking about how CBS news staff in Manhattan had to sift through a 1000 videos submitted from people supposedly on the ground in Israel or Gaza last week, only 10% of what they were submitted was found to be actually usable. And the media is usually all about just putting whatever they get, up on the news, they'll show you pretty much anything it seems like. Speaker 6: Well, Kaled, this is the creator that Stops Dave Kennedy in his tracks yesterday when, as you say, he was walking his beach here along Port Marnock Beach In Dublin, we're joined by Dave now. Dave, tell us, what was your reaction when you came across this? Speaker 3: Complete shock, to be honest. I was walking along just with the dog and Came across the impact site. Fortunately enough, I love space exploration and astrophysics, so I was a bit surprised when I saw it, but I knew immediately that it was an impact site. And then, lo and behold, right in the middle of it was The Rock. Speaker 6: Tell us about this rock. What what about it made you think that this has to be a meteor strike? Speaker 3: So I noticed by the way it came in and where it was landed, it had created the big mound around, so that was everything from the inside that was blown out. But it's Just the the actual weight of it and its density. You're definitely gonna have to get it checked to see what it's made of. Speaker 6: And tell us about the markings on it. Speaker 3: So Across here, you can actually see see the way it's just scoring. So that would have happened as it's coming through the atmosphere and it and it was burning up. So that would have left the mark here before it made impact. Speaker 4: Now finally this lunchtime the mystery of the hole on the North Dublin beach has apparently been solved the hopes of a local space enthusiast who had hoped it was the site of a meteor strike, but footage emerged last night of 2 men digging a hole on Port Monarch Beach. Speaker 1: This time, it says some of the 900 videos rejected by staff were produced by so called deep fake artificial intelligence technology, Which is able to fool people into believing that someone said something they did not say, for example, or just fool people altogether. Like this video right here, this this isn't real. Nothing in this video. This is unreal engine. This is a video game creation tool That can make things now that are so real if you I don't even know how you would know because if I had just seen that and that pink Bobby thing wasn't moving around on the screen. I would think I was looking at a car on fire in the streets. How would you know this was fake? A lot of what they're doing right now with this is so amazing, but you can't tell the difference. You you literally can't. What people are seeing is openly being admitted that they're trying to sway people's opinions one way or the other. We're really to the point where it is very hard to know or tell the difference unless you're there, which is something we've been talking about for years, but now it's being used in this insidious way to further this war agenda, and it's it's har I'm horrified that this is what is going on right now. Earlier this year, the United States and Israel participated in the largest ever military drill that these 2 countries have ever done together In history Speaker 7: Over the past week, I've observed our CENTCOM troops participating in Juniper Oak 23 tac 2 alongside our Israel Defense Forces. Speaker 1: So in 75 years, this is the largest military drill ever ever carried out by them. Of course, at the time, they said it was for no particular reason. No no particular reason we're doing, you know, a massive military drill with eight 1,000 soldiers and a 140 planes and a carrier group and all this stuff. No no real reason, though. Just decided this year, We're gonna have the the largest ever joint military drill in in Israel's history. That's it's whatever. Right? That was in January. In March, this came out in The Intercept, and I just need to read this to you because I this is what I'm saying. This is part of what I think people don't understand. We now have US special forces that are calling for the use of deep fakes in their psychological operations. And so this is from March 6th, and it says US Special Operations Command responsible for some of the country's most secretive Endeavors is gearing up to conduct Internet propaganda inception campaigns online using deep fake videos according to federal contracting documents reviewed by The Intercept, We're gonna look at those in a second. The plans which also describe hacking Internet connected devices to eavesdrop in order to assess foreign population susceptibility to propaganda come at a time of intense global debate over technologically sophisticated disinformation campaigns, their effectiveness, and the ethics of their use. While the US government routinely warns against the risk of deepfakes and is openly working to build tools to counter them, the document from special operations commander SOCOM represents a nearly unprecedented instance of the American government or any government openly signaling its desire to use the highly controversial technology offensively. So this is a whole procurement document, and there's more in here than just the fact that they wanna do deepfakes. I I have looked through this document, which by the way, it doesn't have a closing date till December 31, 2025. So they have opened this up as an announcement for technology development and advanced technology development that they want and I just want to Read a couple of things to you. At first, it talks about how they're they're now operating in a communication contested environment information is weaponized. It's a world of convergence, the point where the gap between nonstate and state actor capabilities diminishes. And They want things in here. I've just hit a few points. They want things in here like standoff biometrics, which include a distance of up to 8 feet With the ability to quickly ingest physical, behavioral, physiological, and electromagnetic signatures, which can be used to measure response rates provide confidence factors and assist in determining campaign effectiveness. I mean, I get that it's a lot of word salad, but that's also horrifying. They want to be able to tell from 8 feet away if they scared the hell out of you with their propaganda campaign using your electromagnetic signatures they also talk about touchless fingerprint capture at near and extended distances they want to be able to capture people's fingerprints from a distance Stuff I wanna talk about is further down, way down towards the bottom of the document actually. They're talking about having payloads, the ability to send and receive messages in Urban and rural environments which include radio broadcast, television broadcast, cellular including LTE and five g, non radio frequency communications, Internet of things, loudspeaker, sonic projection, airdrop capabilities, electronic warfare, electronic tax, Long term viability either with solar panels or energy sources and holographic projection capability. This sounds like blue bean to me. Then you go further and it talks about next generation effects of disruptive technology areas, which include nontraditional, non con nonkinetic effects, Technologies to effectively deny, degrade, disrupt, deceive, or destroy adversarial targets and infrastructure, Which will be conducted at classified level secret and above. This document by the way is unclassified. And then it says directed energy and electromagnetic warfare, Which is something interestingly that people have been saying on Twitter for like the last couple years, and they keep getting called conspiracy theorist over and over, but here it is right here, directed energy and electromagnetic warfare, directed energy technologies for delivering nonkinetic scalable effects on a multitude of hard and soft targets, offensive electronic warfare payloads with overmatching target effectiveness at tactically and operationally relevant ranges, but then you get all the way down here to page 16, and this is where it covers military information support operations, which is what psychological operations changed into so that it now sounds meaningless to most people and they don't realize that it's psyops. MISO is SIOPS, okay? MISO technologies for influence operations, digital deception, communication disruption, and disinformation campaigns at the tactical edge and operational levels, provide next generation capability to collect disparate data through public and open source information streams such as social media, local media, And enable MISO to craft and direct influence operations and messages in relevant peer near peer environments, provide a next generation of, quote, deep fake or other similar technology to generate messages and influence operations for nontraditional channels, generate next generation capability to take over Internet of Things devices for the collection of data and information from local populaces To enable breakdown of what messaging might be popular and accepted through sifting of data once received. So they wanna be able to listen in to people's Internet of Things connected devices to See if their deep fake and other psychological operations have properly influenced and deceived the people they were meant to influence and deceive. This would enable me so to craft and promote messages that may be more readily received by local populace. So That's the level, okay, that we're at when our own government is openly calling for contractors to help them create These kinds of technologies specifically for use in psychological operations. And the intercept says when it comes to disinformation, the pentagon should not be fighting fire with fire. I mean, they always come out. This is the head of the Brookings Institution's artificial intelligence and emerging technology initiative who said this, And they always come out and say these things like, yeah, they that's a really obvious thing they shouldn't be doing. It's gonna be really really bad. Shrug because they're gonna do it anyway. Like, why are they even saying this? At a time when digital propaganda is on the rise globally, the US should be doing everything it can to strengthen democracy by building support for shared notions of truth and reality. Deepfakes do the opposite. By casting down on the credibility of all content and information, Whether real or synthetic, they ultimately erode the foundation of democracy itself. If deepfakes are gonna be leveraged for targeted military intelligence Operations, they're used needs to be subject to review and oversight. Another incredibly obvious statement that shouldn't even have to be made and yet there it is. At a time when there should be building support for shared notions of truth and reality, I think our shared notions of truth and reality were completely destroyed during the COVID psyops, so now here we are. Okay? And now they're openly saying this is what they're going to do. And the point of all of this that I'm bringing to your attention is something that James Corbett talks about 5th generation warfare, And I was not aware of I've I had seen God's Face Like the Sun in Canary Cry Radio. I saw him Talking about this on X, what is 5th generation warfare? Because I apparently had some reading to do, and I didn't realize it, and The way that it's explained is that warfare has gone through these stages where it used to be tribal, it used to be fought with everybody, And then at some point, it became states against states. You know, the soldiers, they have uniforms, they have a specific flag they're carrying, and they're fighting each other in an official War like manner, but that hit a peak around the 3rd generation, and it has been slowly devolving back down into a very decentralized warfare scenario that involves everybody now whether they realize it or not. And When I read that, I thought, you know, that actually makes a lot of sense considering what we just saw during COVID, where they're more interested in testing out people's perceptions of what is going on than they are about testing the products involved in what is going on. Do you know what I'm saying? Because that is what happened and has been happening. And so I just want to read a little bit of this to you Because I think it makes a whole lot of sense to explain. It goes very far in explaining where we actually are right now. And he says we're in the middle of a world changing war, and he's not talking about Ukraine or Yemen or these things that are going on. He's talking about an even Broader war taking place everywhere on the globe that involves virtually everyone on the planet, young and old, male and female, military and civilian, It is the war of every government against its own population in every international institution against free humanity, and this is no ordinary war. Most of the victims in this war aren't even able to identify it as a war nor do they understand that their combatants in it. It's called 5th generation warfare. He talks he goes through kind of the history of these different ages of the generations of warfare. He said 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation warfare brought us to the late 20th century when nation states began to lose their monopoly on war and military combat returned to a more decentralized form. In the 4th generation, the lines between civilian and military became blurred. Armies tended to engage in counterinsurgency operations Rather than military battles, enemies were often motivated by ideology and religion, making psychological operations more important than ever. But some argue now we have entered a new era called 5th generation warfare, which is still debated on what actually defines The 5th generation, but for the purposes of the editorial, Corbett says he's not interested in that debate. He's just going to use a decidedly non academic definition from an Al Jazeera article. The basic idea behind this term is that in the modern era, wars are not fought by armies or guerrillas, but in the minds of the common citizen. There's 2 important things to note about this definition. The first is that 5th generation warfare isn't being waged in standing armies of nation states or guerrilla insurgents, but everyday citizens. And the second is that the war is not being fought on a battlefield somewhere. It's in people's heads. I will expand this definition somewhat to include the fact the war is being waged at all levels not just mental. Corvette says 5th generation warfare is an all out war being waged against All of us by government and the international organizations to which they belong, it gives each and every one of us right now it is a battle for Full spectrum dominance over every single aspect of your life. Movement, interaction, transaction, innermost thoughts and feelings, desires, Governments the world over are working with corporations to leverage technology to control you down to a genomic level, and they will not stop until each and every person who resist them is subdued or eliminated. The most incredible part of all of this is that so few know that this war is even taking place, let alone that they are in it. And then he goes through and talks about all these different things, neurological warfare, information warfare, biological warfare. We know all these, the economic warfare. Economic warfare. They're openly saying right now, there's a guy. He got up on stage. Where's that clip? Hold on. I'm a play you a clip. Speaker 8: I think the problem that we've had is that we've people decided they didn't really want to work so much anymore through COVID and that has had a massive issue on productivity. Tradies have definitely pulled back on productivity. They have been paid a lot to do not too much in the last few years and we need to see that change. We need to see unemployment rise. Unemployment has to jump 40%, 50%, in my view. We need to see pain in the economy. We need to remind people That they work for the employer, not the other way around. I mean, there is a there's been a systematic change where employees feel the employer is extremely lucky to have them as opposed to the other way around. So it's a dynamic that has to change. We've got to kill that attitude and that has to come through hurting the economy, which is what the whole global the world is trying to do. The governments around the world are trying to increase unemployment to get that to some sort of normality. And we're saying Got to kill that attitude and that has to come through hurting the economy, which is what the whole global Yeah. The the world is trying to governments around the world are trying to increase unemployment. Speaker 1: This guy is a CEO who sat up at the Financial review property summit and straight said that the world economy is purposefully being manipulated to impose financial pain on everyone on purpose to manipulate people back into submission. He's they're just straight saying stuff now to people, Completely inflammatory stuff and they don't care. They don't they have no qualms about whether or not You heard that and you recognize that it's directed at you. They're just they're just openly saying it Because we're also living in a time of what is known as the apocalypse, the great revealing, the great veil of everything being torn down so they could show you everything, And they're just in your face with all of it. It's it's incredible. It's an incredible and horrifying time to be alive. I don't know what else to say. Speaker 9: It's worthwhile with all of this gaining, you know, some steam and public perception to be clear on some facts. 1st and foremost, the vast majority of this money is going to American companies and jobs. Right? Because those are the people who are making the Abrams tanks, the ammo, and everything else. When you take Lockheed Martin, Which makes the HIMARS that have been core to Ukraine's counter offensive. The company announced it's gonna increase its workforce in Camden, Arkansas by 20% just because of this new demand. I thought he's going to America. Speaker 1: But these are the types of warfare that is talking about, and they're not being it's that's the war. It's 5th generation warfare, and until people realize that that's where we are because I think people still think war is between, you know, countries or it's between a country and an insurgency group. But very clearly, that is not what's going on here. When you have them openly calling for in an unclassified document that anyone can read, it's Available. I will put a link. Go read it for yourself. They're openly saying we're going to be using deepfakes now, which are not real in psychological operations to target populations with influence campaigns, they're openly saying this stuff. They're just putting it out there now. This is the kind of stuff that used to be classified, they never would have admitted it in I don't even know how many years. This is the kind of stuff that it took, you know, the church committee hearings to even come to a point of some of this, you know, being told to the public. It took A lot of it was going on for decades, and they were able to hide it, and people didn't know about it now. It's just they don't even they're even trying to hide it now is the point that I guess I'm trying to make. And we're we're in this time where the technology is slamming into this environment that we're all in in this post COVID world with everything that just happened, With trust in institutions and governments and media and all the the probably the lowest it's ever been in modern human history, And now we have all of these new technological advances, and they're going to be weaponized in this way, and it's openly being admitted. And that's what I'm trying to say. Every time a new thing happens is everybody takes sides and fight amongst themselves while everything that's going on the background marches forward and continues, and people keep wondering why nothing changes. Well, it's it's it's not going to because the same thing keeps getting done over and over. You know? It's this idea that if we just kill enough people and have enough wars, like, some I brutal war our way to world peace. Like, that's not gonna happen, by the way. There's no such thing as as we're just gonna fight wars and then they'll that's not how peace happens, not through war. Peace does not happen through war. Humanity's had 100 of years to learn this lesson. Just, why don't we ever have peace? Yeah, I don't know why. I don't I don't know why. Let's have some more war and figure it out. This is about to touch off. They're doing everything they can to ensure that it will, and they've only been talking about Making sure that happens since before I was born long before I was born. So this is not new. This is just the latest version of what's being pushed here. And I thing is is I was not awake and aware on 911. Back at that time, I was I had a lot going on in my life. I pretty much ignored as much as I could. If I had an opinion at all, it probably came from Jon Stewart on The Daily Show. People like Aaron understood what was happening that day. I didn't, but I understood it this time. And The feeling of the burden of that knowledge is so painful. It's so painful. And my heart is just broken for people. The amount of people now who are just like, yep, World War 3, that's just that's just unavoidable. This is the way things have to be. Like, no. This isn't the way things have to be. This is the way things have been purposefully driven for decades decades. And people are just accepting it. And I guess they'll just accept the the world state after that just to say, well, it's the way things have to be. They brought everybody down to a point of just accepting all of this stuff, and that they've taken this whole thing to the next level people don't even realize, like, you're just being they're inundating everybody with the most advanced psychologically weaponized propaganda of Literally all of known modern human history right now. And I just think everyone should keep that in mind as we go forward because that's where we are. That is what is happening. That's the level that things are at. I love you guys. Hug your children. Hug your family members. Tell people you haven't talked to for a while how much you love them because this is insane. It's insane.
Johnmc42069
Posted - December 4, 2023 at 8:49 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 9:45 PM

@Johnmc42069 - John's Memes

Welcome to the near future. We need to unite and stand up to this. We the people! https://t.co/hpTwL8X0lG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mateo Torres is mistakenly arrested and protests his innocence, asking to speak to a human. He is taken to CorrectiCorp Detention Facility, where an AI named Halo offers legal assistance. Halo recommends pleading guilty, stating an 89.5% chance of conviction and a potential sentence of 85 to 47 years. Mateo refuses and insists on speaking to a human. He tries to call the chief of police but is informed that he authorized a costly call. The video ends with Mateo expressing his frustration at the unexpected charges.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Identity confirmed. Mateo Torres, you are under arrest. Please put these on. Speaker 1: Why? I didn't do nothing. I'm just going to work. Speaker 0: Failure to comply will result in the use of nonlethal force. Final warning. Speaker 2: Relax. This Speaker 1: is a mistake. Can I speak to a human? Human? Speaker 2: Please proceed to Cellblock c 14. Welcome to CorrectiCorp. We at Correct A Corp Detention Facility want to make your stay the best it can be. Speaker 1: No. Thank you. I'm I Speaker 3: wanna speak to a lawyer. Speaker 1: Hi. I'm Ben Saperstein, and I am Halo. Do not worry. We are here to help. Oh, public defender. Please wait. Speaker 3: There is an 89.5% chance you will be found guilty. Guilty of what? This ruling will likely carry a sentence of 85 to 47 years in prison. I recommend that you plead guilty. A A plea bargain may result in a lesser punishment of 5 to 7 years. Plead guilty to what? Are you sure you want to plead guilty? Speaker 1: No. To confirm your decision. No. No. Speaker 3: I'm I'm not guilty. Are you sure you want to plead not guilty? Speaker 1: I didn't do anything. Speaker 3: I'm sorry. I didn't get that. Please try again. Speaker 1: I I wanna speak to a human Speaker 2: Would you like to place a call? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: Who would you like to call? Speaker 1: The the chief of police. The the human one. Speaker 2: Please accept the terms and conditions in order to place your outgoing Speaker 1: Thank you for calling the LAPD. A human representative will be with you shortly. Please hold. Hey. What does that mean? Speaker 2: You authorized the transfer of funds from your bank to place a call to Speaker 1: The the chief of police. Speaker 2: The the human one. At $3 per minute for 114 minutes. Speaker 1: What? You what? You never said that.
DakotaSidwell
Posted - January 14, 2024 at 4:01 AM
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 8:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This series of posts covers a wide range of topics, including the awakening of a movement, the involvement of various players in election fraud, the role of intelligence agencies, the Clinton Foundation, Pizzagate, the COVID-19 pandemic, financial events, and the assassination of JFK. The posts provide information and references to support their claims, urging readers to question the mainstream narrative and seek the truth.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨ALERT🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 🧵 1/x This is the beginning of a series of threads I’ll collate together. This is the awakening “on-ramp” thread. I’ll forever be adding to it. Bookmark it. Save the link. Share it. If you’re new to the movement, don’t understand what you’re seeing, are just coming to the realization that the election was stolen, or you’re just now opening your eyes, this thread right here is where you need to start. Start here ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

@monicaonairtalk @cntryclbcdy16 @CISAgov @DecentFiJC First of all, we need to look at some of the players for instance they enlisted the help of our NATO friends.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

2/x How do FTX, USPS, Voter registration information. China, and Gensler come into play ?

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥💥💥💥💥ACT ONE💥💥💥💥💥 THE LAUNDROMAT and a CRYPTO CRASH

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

3/x Who is The Ericsson corporation ? Do you know what the eye of Sauron is ? It’s basically that. ⬇️⬇️⬇️

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

When you dial out to 911... Your phones connection needs to be ported over to Emergency Services - Fire, Police, EMS etc. The company controlling that process is Ericsson. In Feb 2022 their CEO admitted that Ericsson funded & bribed ISIS from 2000-2017. So how'd we get here?

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

4/x You’re probably wondering Dang, how bad is it ? Yeah, it’s BAAAAD. Who’s Robert Steele ?

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

SAVE THE CHILDREN!!! 👼 BOMBSHELL THREAD 🧵 This will be in Honor of 🎖 ROBERT DAVID STEELE 🇺🇲 Watch the 🎞📽🎬 Like and Retweet ❤🔃 #FRAZZLEDRIP #ADRENOCHROME #PIZZAGATE #EPSTEIN #TRAFFICKING

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

5/x You’re probably now like “dang, that’s a lot of information” Yeah it is, so stop reading for a minute and go watch this movie @IntoTheLightFLM It’s the best example of an “on-ramp” to understanding how we’ve been mind-f*cked by our government into a false perception of reality.

@IntoTheLightFLM - Into The Light Official Movie

Into the Light and Out of Shadows DVDs are now available for Preorder here… https://intothelight.store @Crux41507251 @Crux41507251 @laralogan @boonecutler @briangamble_v1 @TheScalpeledge #meme #meme #motivation #fyp #reels #reel

Products OFFICIAL INTO THE LIGHT & OUT OF SHADOWS Products intothelight.store

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@IntoTheLightFLM 6/x Now that you’ve seen into the light, let’s go back to some reading. Who the hell is running this shitshow ? Who’s pulling the strings, why, and how are they organized ? #BritishCrown

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@IntoTheLightFLM 7/x Now you’re kinda getting the picture of who’s who and where, and you’re still kiiinda on the fence as ti if this is all some elaborate set of coincidences, let’s zoom back out to Covid for a minute. @dezzie_rezzie drops some diamonds in this thread.

@dezzie_rezzie - Destiny Rezendes

🧵 Do you really want to know who makes those Moderna Covid-19 Vaccines? If you were among the millions that lined up for one. You should know some facts. Or be ignorant. Either way this is getting posted!

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

8/x Alright, so now you’re probably still trying to figure out if Covid was a bio weapon or a natural event. Fauci might actually be seen as a terrorist by the time this is over. (Just kidding, he is)

@RandPaul - Rand Paul

@COVIDSelect Lie #1️⃣: “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” - Fauci

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

9/x Well dang, you made it this far. Sick, keep going. 💥How do Hillary / Bill tie in here ?💥 The Clinton Foundation. Epstein island

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥UPDATE: There is panic spreading throughout the upper echelon of our intel agencies and many of the private-public NGOs and nonprofits that support and work closely with them right now. That recently-disclosed Clinton Foundation and Jeffrey Epstein (MOSSAD) link is just an absolute disaster for them. 100% mortal wound. And unfortunately for them, not everyone in our agencies and military has been compromised or is willing to disregard their oath to the Constitution. Twitter spaces are about to look VERY different here pretty soon, folks. These are spoilers.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

10/x Shifting gears here. Let’s get ya some financial knowledge. This thread started just back in November, and I try my hardest to keep it updated with all the significant financial events happening behind the scenes. Ngl, the economy is literally hanging on by a thread.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

WHAT STORM MR. PRESIDENT ? 👀

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

11/x Aight So Banks are #fooked The Govt is #fooked The Crown is #fooked What about education ? Nah it’s #fooked too

@realchrisrufo - Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️

Harvard Business School should start preparing a case study on failed leadership and communications based on Claudine Gay's response to the plagiarism scandal. The board initially claimed that Gay didn't commit plagiarism, then tried calling it "duplicative language," then began conceding to the accusations bit by bit, issuing multiple corrections to the academic papers. Gay herself is not leading the public response at all. After one short statement to the Boston Globe, which was not persuasive, she disappeared. She is totally frozen, a non-entity even in her own defense, as the university's brand suffers catastrophic damage. Harvard has the smartest lawyers, a huge comms team, and the best public relations firms, but has absolutely bungled this. Just deeply incompetent crisis response. If Gay had been competent, she would have been speaking on television, releasing op-eds, and fighting to defend the institution. This is Bud Light-level crisis communications.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

12/x Well dang Banks, Schools, Governments, how bad is it ? How compromised is the Us Govt ? Well, just about this compromised

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥Now that we know The Clinton Foundation is 100% MOSSAD, and Hillary Clinton was one of Media Matters’ first advisors, does that mean… …Media Matters is also MOSSAD, and Elon is actually going up against them in his lawsuit? 💥And since Marc Elias was the Chief Counsel for Hillary Clinton for many years… …does that mean Marc Elias is MOSSAD too? (Things are getting very interesting, folks.😏) 💥Btw, now that I’ve got you here, let’s talk about BRUCE LINDSEY, the CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD for THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 Apparently, he’s also been CEO of an organization called “C40 CITIES” since 2003. Interesting. 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 💥Some SUPER F*CKING NEAT “STRATEGIC PARTNERS” and “FUNDERS” they have here: ☑️BLOOMBERG PHILANTHROPIES ☑️UK GOVERNMENT ☑️MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF DENMARK ☑️HEWLETT FOUNDATION ☑️OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS ☑️FONDATION LORÉAL (aka LORÉAL) ☑️WORLDBANK ☑️ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION ☑️MAYORS MIGRATION COUNCIL (lolwut?) And oh yeah, “I Noticed™️” one other organization that’s SUUUPER interesting here… 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 ☑️WELLCOME TRUST (😳🫢🤯🤬) 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 *In case you don’t remember the Wellcome Trust, that’s the organization run by JEREMY FARRAR, who was in the initial crew of “unbiased virologists and scientists” working feverishly (lying) to COVER UP TRUE ORIGINS OF COVID!!! (See Fauci’s FOIA’d emails w/Kristian Andersen, Ralph Baric, Francis Collins, etc.) 💥FUN FACT: This is all ESPECIALLY damning when you recall that MARC ELIAS’S BROTHER (CHRIS) served as Director of Global Development for the BILL & MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION… AND was part of EVENT 201 at JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, ONE MONTH BEFORE COVID ARRIVED IN THE UNITED STATES! (😳😟😨🤯😡🤬) @dezzie_rezzie @AGHuff @Amy31129057 @Daoyu15 @KimWexlerMAJD @Rach_IC @pepesgrandma @TrashDiscourse @Millie__Weaver @NameRedacted247 @DakotaSidwell @EFxScout1League @FIENDSQUAD @Vltra_MK @laralogan

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

13/x Well, just like a Ron Popeil infocommercial “But wait, there’s more” The FiB knowingly controls all Csam and actively works to hide evidence and obfuscate investigations. As alluded to the recent movie “The Sound of Freedom”

@SOFMovie2023 - Sound of Freedom | Movie

Sound of Freedom is America’s #1 movie taking the top spot at the box office on Independence Day. See it in theaters TODAY, get showtimes at angel.com/tickets

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

14/x Alright, now you’re thinking nah, that’s a movie, they embellished it, never happened, or you’re trying to figure out the anger that just mustered itself in the pit of your stomach. Welp Buckle in, you’re about to figure out where you can start to focus that anger, and dispel the anxiety and confusion. We’re at war with ALL of the intelligence agencies.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

What if I told you there's a LITERAL Shadow War going on in CYBERSPACE - RIGHT NOW - between several Former and current Presidents++ working against the best interest of We The People and that there's data, contracts and CONCRETE EVIDENCE to prove it all? 🚨 Twitter Files 2.0 🚨

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

15/x Now that you’ve realized that the collective power of the largest military intelligence complex ever built is at war with the American people, you’re probably wondering how we got here. Well A little thing called the Smith-mundt act. Legalized psyops and propaganda in the US…..

@APhilosophae - CulturalHusbandry

Knowing as well that the Smith Mundt Act was passed, which allows the US government to propagandize the US population further cements just what is happening in this country and in turn to countries around the world. https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

16/x Cool Now we know that the intel agencies are using psyops. How did this happen without us realizing it ? Excellent question, and I would defer you to our @GenFlynn and @boonecutler for their book series on 5th generational warfare. The fight is designed so you can’t identify your enemy. Knowing their patterns, tactics, and behaviors allows you to identify them. (I am not affiliated in any way, and am not paid for this promotion) Introduction to 5GW (The Citizen's Guide to Fifth Generation Warfare) https://a.co/d/2kvJsQr

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@GenFlynn @boonecutler 17/x So, by now we’ve established that we’re engaged in a psychological war. Well, it’s also VERY much a kinetic conflict. One question we haven’t addressed tho Wtf is “pizzagate” ⬇️⬇️⬇️

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

THREAD: THE CLINTON’S & THEIR TIES TIES TO A POTENTIAL CHILD PORN SITE, PIZZAGATE & DISTURBING INSTAGRAM POSTS! In light of @dom_lucre bombshell report tying Bill and Hillary Clinton to a potential pedophile ring, I want to give a history of their ties to a potential porn site and disturbing images that exploit children. This is Pizzagate. James Alefantis is the owner of Comet Ping Pong. Alefantis and the media have claimed for years that his restaurant is a “family friendly” pizza joint.  He has hosted fundraisers for Hillary, a birthday party for John Podesta and was a regular visitor at the White House under Barack Obama’s presidency.  Alefantis even posted a photo of then President Barack Obama in the White House play ping pong with a child and put the hashtag “White House Christmas party” in the caption. The media distorted Pizzagate to make it all about Alefantis and his basement that they insisted didn’t exist.  What the media failed to tell you is that Alefantis said himself in an interview with Metro Weekly about Comet Ping Pong, that he stores their tomatoes in the basement.  In 2016 after the Podesta E-mails came out, Alefantis reversed course and made the new claim that Comet Ping Pong has no basement. Not one person in the media asked him why just a year prior he referenced in an interview that the pizza parlor did have a basement. He posted a photo of a child taped to a table.  He also posted a photo of an infant and called her a “hotard”.  In another photo of a baby he wrote the caption “Why does Daddy like BUTT?” In one photo there is a man holding a baby with what appears to be sex and/or anal beads around the child’s neck and the caption is “chicken lovers”.  Chicken lovers is a pedophile code word defined as an adult man who is sexually attracted to children.  In another image, there’s three people wearing creepy masks including what appears to be an underage boy.  This appears to be at least the depiction of some kind of Satanic ritual that could be a scene straight out of Eyes Wide Shut. I want to highlight two more photos, and please keep in mind there are many more disturbing images out there that I haven’t included in this column. Alefantis also posted a Jeff Koons photo that appears to be a man penetrating a small body that looks like the body of a child. Also, a regular at Comet Ping Pong posted a photo of a man laying on the floor bloodied in underwear and tagged the pizza joint as the location. Alefantis commented under this photo “sex”. More disturbing — there is a cage in the background. What was that cage used for?

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@GenFlynn @boonecutler 18/x Now that we’ve established that Pizzagate is real, or maybe you’re still not sure…… The FiB formally acknowledged the associated symbolism.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@GenFlynn @boonecutler 19/x Just in case you’re failing to comprehend this subject Here’s another perspective.

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

With more Epstein docs coming out, I thought I’d do a quick reminder of how PIZZAGATE has been OFFICIALLY DEBUNKED for years. So this should help all a y’all out if you don’t know about it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker debunks the Pizzagate conspiracy theory by highlighting the lack of evidence and biased sources used to debunk it. They question the credibility of news organizations like PolitiFact and the Poynter Institute, which are funded by organizations with their own agendas. The speaker then presents court documents and FBI reports that mention the use of pizza as a code word for child sexual abuse material. They argue that while Pizzagate may not be directly linked to Hillary Clinton, there are valid questions that need to be answered. The speaker also mentions the suppression and censorship of information surrounding Pizzagate, raising further suspicions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Pizzagate conspiracy has been debunked a 1000 times, and I'm gonna show you exactly how. You know the theory that the Clintons were somehow involved in some child sex trafficking scheme or something. If you're not familiar, I'm going to show you all about it and show you exactly how it's been debunked. So you can go to any reputable news source of your choice. I chose PolitiFact for this one. It was just the first one that came up and I just highlighted all of the language they use to help you understand that it's debunked. When we scroll down in this article, you can see that they're citing their sources with links, and so we'll click on this link that should show us how there's no evidence. Well, that links us to another PolitiFact article, that tells us that there's no evidence. Cool. So we'll scroll down in this article to find the evidence. Cool. So they're citing their sources with these links. We'll click on this link. That'll take us to the evidence. Oh, cool. It took us to another PolitiFact article. That's interesting. And if we go back to the original article that we were at at the very bottom of the article, I found the part where they cite their sources. So we're all good. Their sources are the wall street journal and PolitiFact. And those are all more news organizations. Spoiler alert. If you go to those articles, They'll just be nepotism circles of them linking to their own articles as well. If you look up PolitiFact, they're owned by the Poynter Institute. If you look them up on influence watch .org, they're labeled as very left of center. Pointer continues to expand its role in fact checking through the creation of International Fact Checking Network of Meet and MediaWise, a Google Foundation funded partnership with Stanford University to Teach teenagers how to discern fact from fiction online. Alright. Let's teach teenagers how to discern fact from fiction online because you guys are failing at it and it's so easy to debunk the whole Pizzagate conspiracy theory using actual facts and and evidence. Like, why don't you guys actually link to facts and evidence and primary sources instead of to your own news articles? That's not how you teach teenagers to discern fact from fiction online, that's propaganda. Look, I'll show you how it's done. First things first, you look who's funding your sources and this is who's funding politic fact. And if you know anything about these organizations, it says a lot. But even more interestingly, this is who's funding the Poynter Institute that says gatesfoundation.org at the top, $382,000 when they were starting PolitiFact. You know, this Bill Gates, and this is a good time to remind us all that the Pizzagate conspiracy came out way before the Epstein revelations came out. Am I like way out of line to say that Epstein is pretty solid evidence that there might be some child trafficking going on with elites, right? Like is that too far out there to just say that we should maybe be looking into it? Obviously, Epstein has nothing to do with Hillary and nothing to do with Pizzagate. So let's debunk Pizzagate real quick using actual evidence. Before we get to the emails that started the whole thing, let's quickly look at some court documents. This one is filed in 2023 United States District Court. You can find this yourself if you search for this case and document and such online because you know, that's how you discern fact from fiction guys, in case you didn't know is you have sources that can be corroborated. You should be warned that these next 2 documents contain really fucked up graphic descriptions of abuse. So don't read if you don't want to know about that stuff, but it clearly States right here that the plaintiff used pizza as a code word to talk about CSAM, which is child sexual abuse material, meaning child pornography. More about that here. If you wanna read all this effed up shit, you can pause. And if you really wanna know how horrible the world is, you can pause. These are documents that were released by the FBI in 2007, because they, the FBI looks into this stuff. The FBI researches child trafficking and they, they understand how this works, which is why all these internet conspiracy theorists don't need to help because they're not helping because the FBI already knows that these are symbols used by pedophiles to denote various different sexual attractions and to kind of identify each other to each other. The report goes on to identify a few more logos. And these were the logos of the various businesses that the conspiracy theorists were like, these logos like, look awfully similar to this. You know, that one looks awfully similar to this one. Right? Right? Like, I don't know. Maybe circumstantial. Right? Debunked. Besides, what does the FBI know anyways? And besides, they actually all changed their logos afterwards anyways because they were getting harassed by vile conspiracy theorists. No. But in all seriousness, that does not prove anything. It's just data. And it's important to know about this directly from the FBI, because this kind of stuff comes up a lot in discussions about child trafficking, not just related to Pizzagate. Anyways, back on pizza as a code word, this is a court case from 2017 statement sworn by special agent Isidro Cruz where the undercover operative responded to a Craigslist ad, entitled womenmoms that are into cheese pizza, which sought to connect with mothers who were into perverted topics. They discussed a potential meeting with the 8 year old daughter. The trafficker later admitted that cheese pizza was was a reference to child pornography. So to clarify, it's not like the Pizzagate thing happened because these emails came out and then the Pizzigators were just like, Oh, they're talking about pizza. We're going to pretend like that must be code for this thing. What happened was they were like, these are weird things to Say, what do they mean? And they dug and they discovered that the FBI is already aware that pizza and other food references are often used as code words because you're not allowed to just Talk about that kind of shit online, but you need to orchestrate the sales of these things because it's an enormous industry in the world and it's a huge problem. I think we can all agree, Even if only 1 child in this world is trafficked, that's a huge problem and it needs to stop. So let's just all remember that we're all on the same team here, That child abuse in any form is reprehensible and needs to stop. We are all on that team. Okay? Question is whether these crazy conspiracy theorists are just lunatics or whether they're actually onto something. And as we already know, they've been debunked, and were in the process of showing you how they've been debunked. Because it's honestly just not even believable that an elite in a position of power that we think is probably a good person would ever do anything that was not good. Right? And ever since the internet came around, child trafficking has been using the internet to traffic children. But this year, a whole thing about Etsy broke. Yeah, these are all screenshots of actual postings on Etsy of things for sale, right? And just look at them and think that's, what is that about? Notice that this whole account is titled yummy, yummy pizza, yummy, yum pizza. And once this all broke, they stopped selling on Etsy because it's kind of weird that there's an account selling pictures of kids eating pizza for 1,000 of dollars, Right? That's a little weird. But it's not just that account and notice how these accounts have pizza in their names. Meaning How is the pizza account going to go and sell real things when you like that? They're clearly here to sell pictures of pizza for 1,000 of dollars or dolls, for €28,000 or drawings for 47,000 or, Yeah. And when you look at the order info for this one handmade delivering from Turkey, and then they stop selling because, yeah, that's kind of weird. 50,000. Just just look at it. What, what are they selling? Only 1 left? 20 view? Yeah. So anyways, what started the whole thing was a leak of emails from Hillary Clinton's email servers that were leaked to WikiLeaks by a Russian spy. You can do the dig. It was not a Russian spy. It was someone inside the DNC. They leaked a shitload of emails with some really weird stuff in Speaker 1: Also interesting to remember, it's illegal to possess, these stolen documents. It's different for the media. So everything you learn about this, you're learning from Us and in full Let's take a look at what is in there and what it means. Speaker 0: In case you're wondering, he's full of shit. Journalists have no special privileges, it's just first amendment. Whoever leaked them might have committed a crime, but you're not committing a crime when you view them. The ones from Podesta were actually so toxic that they have scrubbed the Internet of all access. WikiLeaks is down for the Podesta emails. You can't get it. Fortunately, the Internet never forgets. Hi, John, the realtor found a handkerchief. I think it has a map that seems pizza related. Is it yours? They can send it if you want. I know you're busy. Feel free not to respond. Remember that map also means minor attracted person when you're talking about other things. And it's just a kind of weird email to send. To mention this one that was in the Hillary Clinton emails, that ends with with fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch. Why isn't that linked in the PolitiFact article? That I have questions, Right? And that's the point. I thought this was debunked, but I got a lot of questions. I'm not claiming that, like, Hillary Clinton is like a satanist that's drinking blood or anything. I'm saying I have questions, and why aren't we answering? This is a big deal. And the mainstream media treatment that it gets makes it even more suspicious. And I have even more questions. I'm not sure there's another story on the Internet that is more heavily suppressed and censored, and I can't help but wonder why.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

20/x JUST IN CASE YOU HAVENT GRASPED IT YET. In the best, most outraged, angry @RealAlexJones voice possible….. THE WORLD IS RUN BY A SATANIC, ANTI-HUMAN CABAL THAT IS HELL BENT ON KEEPING US IN THEIR SYSTEM OF OPPRESSION AND SLAVERY https://x.com/jimfergusonuk/status/1746178010435195078?s=46

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Alert: Son of Co-founder of the World Economic Forum blows the lid off and exposes the pure Evil of Klaus Schwab. Calls for arrest of Klaus Schwab. A Global Depopulation Agenda is underway. War has been declared on humanity. "Our light obliterates the darkness of Evil" Pascal Najadi The fightback for the soul of humanity and our freedoms is underway. Trying to stay hidden. Trying to not be noticed wont work. They will come for you anyway. Its time to fight back against the Globalists. Its time to join the resistance. Join us http://freedomtraininternational.org People can fight back and take action. Go to twc.health/jimferguson and use CODE:JIM10 for people who want to get spike reducing supplements and associated products for a saving of 10% which have been proven to reduce the spike proteins responsible for the damage being caused to the vaccine injured.#VaccineInjured #ExcessDeaths #SpikeProtein #SuddenDeaths #mRNA #Canada #UK #USA #Australia #NewZealand #Ivermectin #GlobalistParasites #WEF #WEF2030Agenda #PascalNajadi #NWO #FreedomTrainInternational #GlobalResistance #Switzerland #Davos #Covid #mRNA #VaccineInjuries #ExcessDeaths #DiedSuddenly #BillGates #BioWeapon #Genocide

Video Transcript AI Summary
Everything evil related to genocide comes from Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO), Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are all responsible. The WEF, which my father cofounded but left in the early eighties, has diplomatic immunity. I declare that the WEF should not have diplomatic immunity anymore and urge Swiss authorities to arrest them. The WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates advocate for injecting a bioweapon into 5.7 billion people. As a Swiss citizen, I am a victim of this and so is my mother. It's genocide, and justice will prevail. We, the masses, must stand up and say no to the poison being injected into humanity. We are the guardians of humanity, and our light will overcome the darkness of evil.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything evil in the world related to demo side, unfortunately, comes from Geneva. You have WHO in Geneva. You have Gavi, then you have the WES, the The World Economic Forum which my father was a cofounder and left out of disgust in the early eighties, that has Diplomatic immunity. I as a Swiss citizen right here now declare that the WEF is not eligible anymore for diplomatic immunity. I call on the Swiss authorities and security to arrest those people immediately. Why? The WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Bill Gates, All advocated a global humanity injection by a bioweapon Injecting nano lipids into 5,700,000,000 people. And we Swiss are hosting them. That's terrible. We cannot tolerate any entity that promotes poison to be injected into humanity. But you have done it. I'm the victim. I'm dying from it. And my mother too. It's a demo side, and you'll be judgment. It will be corrected in the name of humanity. If you have a house of cards, and this is a house of cards of a criminal, One card pulled by justice and the whole card house collapses. But from hope alone, it is not done. Everybody must now change the spirit. And all the vaccinated, the injected, knowing that they are poison, We are the masses. We are billions of people. Let's just stand up and say, stop. We will not and in French, Because we are the guardians of humanity, and our light obliterates the darkness of evil.
New landing page – Inspiration Station freedomtraininternational.org

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@RealAlexJones 21/x Now that we might have finally established the fact that Pizzagate is not only real, but likely still active because the MSM suppressed the story. Let’s establish more fact The 2020 election was stollen.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Debunking the Media's Claim That All of Trump's 2020 Election Challenges Were 'Baseless' An Election Integrity review conducted on 92 court challenges filed over the 2020 election found that a clear majority of the cases decided on the merits were ruled favorably for the plaintiffs; particularly, the Republican Party and the Trump campaign. The election review noted the cases decided on the merits and those that were dismissed for lack of standing or other procedural issues. "Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference)." The list of court cases decided on the merits, meaning "the Plaintiff was able to argue the facts of the case, and, if applicable, given opportunity to present evidence via Discovery," as well as the links to the case information, can be found below. “You’re gonna wanna bookmark this,” remarked Arizona Sun Times reporter @Rach_IC. “This is a compilation of all of the 2020 election challenges and what became of them. Despite the MSM lies that 60+ election challenges found no evidence of wrongdoing, there were actually 92 cases, with only 30 decided on the merits, and of those 30, Trump and/or the GOP plaintiff prevailed in 22 of them.” The case entries, many linking to Stanford’s Healthy Election Project, confirm the statuses and the rulings. It is debatable whether affirmative rulings in all of the cases would have been sufficient to lead to Donald Trump being elected instead of Joe Biden. The pivotal lawsuit may have been the Texas case brought by AG Ken Paxton contending that a number of swing states made unconstitutional election changes, because they did not go through the state legislatures. This case was denied by the Supreme Court, despite the Constitution stipulating its original jurisdiction. Furthermore, many states have since decided that 2020 election practices such as the inclusion of privately funded "Zuckerboxes" were either illegal or were subsequently outlawed. It is up for debate whether any particular lawsuit would have been the deciding factor, but the critical underlying point is that the election challenges were legal and valid. The sum of these lawsuits paint the picture that the "fortified" 2020 election was highly flawed and undemocratic, since it did not abide by fundamental practices of election integrity. Thus debunks a widespread narrative: Trump's legal challenges to the 2020 election were all “baseless.”

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@RealAlexJones 22/x Ohh that’s BS, it’s all baseless, hurrr durr Nah bro We have the data Get Rekt

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥CISA: Now that we KNOW Azure was online and operational last night in KENTUCKY, and that YOU have ULTIMATE OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITY of maintaining network integrity surrounding our “elections critical infrastructure”, I’m sure you won’t mind receiving a metric SHIT TON of FOIA/PRR requests to see the ALBERT SENSORS DATA from ELECTION DAY and the days leading up to it. You’ll wanna make sure you go ahead and preserve that shit immediately. And I dare you to say you don’t have it. It’ll get ugly.✌️

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@RealAlexJones 23/x By now you’re really probably curious about this massive cesspit continues to get deeper. We’re probably not even half way yet. “How are intelligence agents subverting the people on social media” A great thread to read on the 🚽, cause you’re about to discover some 💩

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥Pro Tip — You may wanna make a note of all the accounts @MistressBossyB (the judge-threatening degenerate tied to Angry Fleas and RudysBallots) is/was following at the time they were pulling all their BS. It’s not an accident. Save it for posterity.

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@RealAlexJones 24/x Alright y’all, let’s shift gears juuuust a little bit. Now that we know what the Gov is capable of, consider this. Who really killed Kennedy ? Was it a rogue intel agency ? The khazarian mafia ? Lee Harvey Oswald ? His driver ?

@Mariecf17 - Mariecf

JFK was murdered in a hit job on Nov 22, 1963. By coincidence (or not) Swiss-Israel Trade Bank assumed management of American Bank & Trust on that very same day. The news was buried. JFK vowed to fight secret societies and dismantle 3 letter agencies. Who were these groups?🧵

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

25/x Oh dang, did you just mention lee Harvey Oswald ? Yup The FiB did too in their investigation into the finders cult… That’s a curious situation

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

What if I told you Lee Harvey Oswald was involved in "The Finders" Satanic Pedophile Cult covered up by the FBI & CIA? Or that the only reason they were declassified is tied to Trump's Declassification of the JFK Files on October 28th, 2017..? Wild huh!? https://vault.fbi.gov/the-finders/the-finders-part-01-of-04/view#pages/p56

The Finders Part 01 of 04 vault.fbi.gov
robertdunlap947
Posted - January 19, 2024 at 11:03 PM
Saved - January 20, 2024 at 1:17 PM

@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙

Oh snap😳. Take cover because TRUTH BOMBS ARE COMING YOUR WAY😲! It’s almost like they are sending all these invaders to WAKE UP OUR NATION🤔! https://t.co/F48noDUvkP

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual in Chicago accuses illegal immigrants of taking away money and job opportunities from the black community. They criticize those who labeled Donald Trump as racist for his stance on immigration, claiming that now the black community is being replaced by illegal immigrants. The speaker blames those who advocated for voting for Democratic candidates regardless of their policies, suggesting that they are now witnessing the consequences of their choices. The speaker concludes by stating that the situation serves as a lesson for those who previously supported open borders.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So did y'all see it? Because I saw it. Illegal immigrant in Chicago tells a black woman, no more money for you. No more money for you. You lazy. Yeah. What you think they doing? See, when Donald Trump was building that wall and Donald Trump was saying close the border, we got a crisis at that border, y'all call Donald Trump racist. Y'all said he was racist. You heard me? Y'all wanted him out of office. I'm sorry to say it, man, but listen, that's what you asked for. Y'all say vote blue no matter who, New York, Chicago, you hear me? California, all these places, and look what's going on. They don't need the black vote no more. They're replacing your aids. With illegal immigrants, they're replacing you. They don't need you. But this is what happened. You say vote blue no matter who. Oh, no. Let the illegals come in. They need to be here. Yeah. Now you see what's going on, now don't you?
jimstewartson
Posted - January 23, 2024 at 3:29 PM
Saved - January 25, 2024 at 2:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Mike Flynn's tactics have been exposed, confirming his involvement with QAnon. I have been targeted by a group of people who constantly attack and discredit me, using personalized criticism and ridicule. They go to great lengths to isolate and demoralize me, spreading lies and generating hatred. This form of warfare, known as "5th Generation Warfare," is essentially a manual for hurting others, even advocating for violence. It is important to address this issue as it amounts to terrorism and should be illegal. #ArrestMikeFlynn

@jimstewartson - Jim Stewartson, Anti-disinfo activist 🇺🇸🇺🇦💙

Mike Flynn confesses to his tactics. For 42 months, ever since I figured out he’s behind QAnon, I’ve been getting this: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it… Cut off the support network & isolate the target from sympathy… Direct personalized criticism & ridicule works.” Right now, there are dozens of people whose full time job is to attack me & anyone who dares to support me. They deploy “personalized criticism & ridicule” all day, every day in an effort to discredit & demoralize me. They brigade my replies, DM my supporters, and lie to the press. They dox, smear, and generate hatred because I tell the truth about Mike Flynn & the Russians. “5th Generation Warfare” is not about defending yourself. It’s is literally an instruction manual for hurting others. It has a chapter called “How to Make People Kill People.” I happen to be an extremely stubborn person who cannot abide bullies. And I’m better at the internet than Mike Flynn, so I have endured this. But most people just run away, and for understandable reasons. “5th Generation Warfare” is terrorism. And it should be illegal. #ArrestMikeFlynn

@jimstewartson - Jim Stewartson, Anti-disinfo activist 🇺🇸🇺🇦💙

The entire population of the United States has been adversely affected by Russian-backed psychological warfare. At least one-third have been directly affected by undue influence caused by psychological operations which created an alternate reality for them. Coercive, traumatic propaganda combined with social engineering has been intentionally tuned to create a weapon of mass mental destruction: —The vast majority of the GOP believe the Big Lie. —Tens of millions believe Pizzagate & QAnon fiction. —Tens of millions of others are adjacent to QAnon through infiltration into Christian churches, “PastelAnon” & other derivatives. The people affected by these lies are living in a different world where monsters—like “Satanic pedophile demonrats”—actually exist to threaten their children and haunt their thoughts all day long. At this point, everyone not directly affected by undue influence knows someone who has been. Anyone who has lost a neighbor, friend, or family member to MAGA/QAnon+ has been affected. Losing someone you care about to an invisible, undeclared war is traumatic. Having a loved one *replaced* by a stranger is a living nightmare. The entire nation has been traumatized & no one even acknowledges it. This central, obvious truth—that we’re all the target of a foreign attack being orchestrated by domestic traitors—is being hidden from us. This is wrong—morally, tactically, and strategically. We are in a global information war that is threatening to turn kinetic. The sides have been drawn and everyone sees it, everyone feels that this is moving towards violence. The biggest mistake we can make is to deprive civilians of the information they need to navigate this threat. Allowing people to hide their heads in the sand while we continue to treat this as politics is how we lose our democracy. “You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.” —Leon Trotsky @POTUS step up.

WillingWitness
Posted - January 26, 2024 at 5:32 AM
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 8:14 PM

@WillingWitness - Derek Broes

🚨 🚨 🚨 ALERT! We are going to war! Inside the U.S. and elsewhere. https://t.co/yYgfEbvfZF

Video Transcript AI Summary
A conversation takes place between two individuals, Cody and Petty Officer Adam from the United States Navy. Cody asks if it is true that the Navy no longer requires GEDs or high school diplomas. Petty Officer Adam confirms that it is true, but explains that a score of 50 or above on the ASVAB is required instead. Cody thanks him for the clarification and jokingly says it looks like they're going to war. Petty Officer Adam appreciates the conversation and offers to answer any further questions. Cody expresses gratitude and ends the call by saying, "Straight from the horse's mouth, we're going to war."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm about Speaker 1: to call the United States Navy. You're gonna wanna hear this conversation. Speaker 0: America's Navy. This is Petty Officer Adam. Speaker 1: Hey, Adam. This is Cody. I'm calling from Washington State. Speaker 0: Hello, Cody. I am in Oregon State. Speaker 1: Yes. I just heard on TikTok that you guys are no longer Acquiring GEDs or high school diplomas. Is that true? Speaker 0: Will do, senior. You still there? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. So the newer so yes. Apparently, it is that is correct. The but the caveat to that is you have to score 50 or above on the ASVAB. Speaker 1: Alright. Well, thank you for clarifying that. Looks like we're going to war. Speaker 0: Well, thanks for Thanks for giving me information. Well, let's hope not, but, thanks for giving me some information. So I appreciate it, and I learned a little bit. So, good to go. Yeah. If you get any more questions or anything, reach out to us. Okay? Speaker 1: I appreciate that. Have a good day. Straight from the horse's mouth, we're going to war.
liz_churchill10
Posted - March 26, 2024 at 2:18 PM
Saved - March 26, 2024 at 2:48 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

This was an attack. People need to accept we’re in World War 3. Every Politician that cannot openly state this is complicit. https://t.co/wSzlw2dsPS

Whiplash437
Posted - April 7, 2024 at 4:36 AM
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 6:20 AM

@Whiplash437 - Whiplash347

Soldiers get this out there. , do it now! https://t.co/jcPiehPucI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the transition from the Federal Reserve note to the US Treasury dollar through the implementation of the Quantum Financial System (QFS). The QFS aims to end financial slavery by using advanced technology and tangible assets like gold and silver to back the monetary system. Traditional banks are said to be shutting down due to lack of assets, leading to a shift towards digital assets like XRP, Stellar, and gold. The speaker urges viewers to be prepared for the digital dollar as cash becomes obsolete.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys out there think this is a joke? There is no more Federal Reserve note on the US debt clock. It is now the US Treasury dollar. UFS is in place. Let me show you. This is essentially the bill. This is on congress.gov. I'm gonna show you guys. This is HR 6227. Look it up. This bill directs the president to implement a National Quantum Mission Initiative Program. Amongst all things, establish the goals and priorities for planning and accelerate the development of quantum information science and technology applications, quantum information science and its use of laws, quantum physics for storage transmission manipulation and measurement of information. What does this all mean? Let me put it in layman's terms. Basically, what it means is the monetary debt system is gonna put an end to the financial slavery and control over the populace. The QFS is of a advanced financial system launched to eradicate monopoly on a monetary system for that purpose. System compromised from artificial intelligence to complex computer programs fully backed by banks as needed. Want the financial system would be a breakthrough in the world of banking, which will lead to a new era of banking. QFS will not be influenced by government policies rather than be backed by tangible assets like gold, platinum, silver, and will not be based upon mere piece of paper, which had no evidentiary value. National Quantum Initiative Act. Here it is. Runconverse.gov. H r c 6227 National Quantum Initiative Act. You guys go on QFS live. You can read all these articles. These articles are really important. You can see, like, talking about the BRICS common currency, BRICS to create further payment mechanisms, precious metals as moving forward, etcetera. I don't tell you guys this is hysteria, but the Quantify Insosystem is in effect. It's it's it's already in effect. It's going through. The banks are shutting down. Silicon Valley Bank started it. Now the dominoes are gonna fall. 187 banks are are said to be wiped out. They don't have the assets. They don't have the gold. When you go and you put in your money in, they don't have the gold to back your money. So what they're doing is they're taking out loans from other bigger banks. And these these bigger banks cannot loan them the money because they don't have the actual gold or the or the silver or the platinum. There's no monetary value that are backing cash. Cash is gonna be gone. Cash is not king anymore, guys. It's gonna be digital assets. And to be exact, these are some of those digital assets. You have XRP Ripple, XLM Stellar, XinFin. You have IOTA. You have Algorand. You have gold. You have silver. I say this so you guys are prepared. Quantum Financial Systems in effect. The Sarah, Jess Sarah. Go on qfsli, go on congress.org. Trust me. This is in effect. You you're not gonna be able to get your money out of the out of the banks. Silicon Valley started it. That bank fell. It started the domino effect. Domino's are following all the other banks you're gonna follow. Get ready for the digital dollar.
ColonelTowner
Posted - December 21, 2024 at 2:58 PM
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 9:24 PM

@ColonelTowner - ColonelTowner-Watkins

Anyone applauding Tim Pool’s “smack down” of a lib video today needs to read or reread .@GenFlynn and .@boonecutler 5GW book. Here’s why: https://t.co/PwoJ66hs1l

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tim Pool's recent video on January 6th has sparked a lot of applause, but many are missing the bigger picture. He suggests only pardoning those who didn't harm police, which is a limited perspective. The January 6th events were orchestrated by the U.S. government, including the CIA and FBI, to undermine Trump. The Capitol Police were complicit, and the idea that attendees should have stood by while a defenseless woman was killed is unacceptable. This reflects a broader pattern of government manipulation, where citizens are entrapped and then punished for defending one another. There should be no exceptions; everyone involved in January 6th deserves a pardon. It's time to stop this tyranny and recognize the injustice faced by those caught in this situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys may have seen Tim Pool's video of him owning the fascist little liberal with regards to January 6th, and I just happened to come across it before I left the house, and I had to go pick something up. So for the last 20 minutes, I've been driving through traffic, and I keep replaying that over and over in my head. Because the reaction of so many people that claim to be awake were applauding Tim Pohl's owning the lip, completely failing to realize that what he was offering was a limited hangout. So if you haven't read general Flynn's 5th Generation Warfare, you need to go read it. If you have, and you applauded Tim Pool, you need to go read it again. Because Tim Pool wedges in this little caveat that only the January 6 people who didn't hit a cop needs to be pardoned, needs to be forgiven, needs to have their sentence commutated, whatever. Let me tell you why that's a limited hangout. Number 1, the US government, the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Defense, all of them staged a coup on January 6th. Their purpose was to ensure that they could impeach Donald Trump prior to the end of his term and for prevent him from ever running again. The United States government staged a coup. The, quote, unquote, cops in the Capitol Police Force, which you don't even know are cops, by the way, because they infiltrate these organizations all the time, were in on a coup to overthrow the government of the United States. I don't give a shit what uniform they had on. They murdered a defenseless woman with a gun, and they beat to death another defenseless woman. And there were Americans that went to Washington DC to a permitted event that Tim Pool would like you to believe should have stood by and watched a defenseless woman get murdered by cops beating her to death. And if you're that man, you need your ass kicked. And if you get on a podcast and suggest that American men at a permitted event is supposed to stand by and watch cops murder defenseless women, fuck you, and the horse you rode in on because you are part of the problem. This is exactly what our CIA does all around the world using operation Gladio principles. They stage events, and then they entrap the citizens, and then they persecute those entrapped citizens when they stand up for each other to drive home a point just like they did with the marine in New York. You aren't allowed to defend yourself. You aren't allowed to defend the people around you. Shut up and take it. Well, fuck you, Temple. We're not shutting up, and we're not taking it anymore, and there are no caveats to pardoning every fucking person that was in January 6th that this tyrannical fascist government put in jail. I'm done with it. This all needs to stop, and it needs to stop right now. And all you limited hang out bullshit artists that are caveating the justification because you put on a uniform that somehow you have the right to beat to death an American citizen? Fuck you all. That's all what I got to say to you. Every January 6th person, whether you were at the capitol or you weren't, whether you hit a cop because you were entrapped in a coup by a government that despises you needs to be pardoned. Period.
iluminatibot
Posted - January 2, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 4:58 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Learn about 5th generation warfare 👇 https://t.co/fF8pex3soS

Video Transcript AI Summary
5th generation warfare is an all-encompassing conflict waged by governments and international organizations against individuals. This war targets every aspect of life, from thoughts to transactions, using technology for control. Information warfare is prevalent, manipulating behavior through normalized propaganda, while neurological and biological warfare aim to alter human capabilities and health. Economic warfare further restricts autonomy, as seen in recent events. The key to resistance lies in creating a parallel society, fostering independence from authoritarian systems across various domains. Rather than engaging in the enemy's battlefield, we must establish our own communities and economies. Ultimately, the only way to win this strange game is not to play at all.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The gist of it is this, 5th generation warfare is an all out war that is being waged against all of us by our governments and the international organizations to which they belong. It's being waged against each and every one of us right now, and it is a battle for full spectrum dominance over every single aspect of your life, your movements and interactions, your transactions, even your innermost thoughts and feelings and desires. Governments the world over are working with corporations to leverage technology to control you down to the genomic level, and they will not stop until each and every person who resists them is subdued or eliminated. The most incredible part of all of this is that so few know that the war is even taking place, let alone that they are combatant in it. The best way to understand this war is to look at some of the ways that is being waged against us. Information warfare. Perhaps the most insidious part of the 5th generation info war is that it has become so normalized that everyone knows it is happening, but no one thinks of it as warfare. Of course everything is advertising, and propaganda, and of course it's being used to manipulate our behaviour. That's just how the world works, isn't it? But we ignore the real nature of the infowar at our own peril. After all, I've often observed that this is a war for your mind, and that the most contested battle space in the world is the space between your ears. You might have thought I meant that metaphorically, but actually, I mean it quite literally. Which brings us to Neurological warfare. To anyone not yet a victim of the information warfare operation designed to prepare humanity for the coming transhuman dystopia, all of this sounds insane. But for those who have fallen for the infowars psyop of the enemy, these types of mind altering technologies are exactly as advertised, exciting opportunities to upgrade the feeble biological wetware we call our brain. But if you think you can avoid the biological aspect of the 5th generation war by simply avoiding the brain chip, you're out of luck. You're also going to have to deal with Biological warfare. I'm sure you can fill in the blanks with myriad other examples of the attacks upon the world's air, water, and biome that constitute this unconstrained 5th generation biological war being waged against us. When and if you do put the pieces of this puzzle together and seek to warn people en masse that they're under attack, your ability to resist this agenda will be predicated on your ability to use your accumulated resources, your wealth, to foster communities of resistance. Don't worry though. The enemy has that domain covered too. Economic warfare. We only have to look to recent events in Canada to understand what this will look like. This perfect control of humanity, down to the level of being able to witness and ultimately to allow or disallow any transaction between any individuals at any time, represents the apotheosis of technocracy, and one of the key objectives of the 5th generation war itself. As this nightmare comes closer and closer to reality, all seems hopeless. But then again, that's exactly the point. The real war. I could go on and on and on and on, but hopefully you get the point by now. There is a world war happening right now. It is a 5th generation war, or whatever you want to call it. It is being waged across every domain simultaneously. It's a war for full spectrum dominance of every battlefield, and every terrain, from the farthest reaches of the globe and beyond, to the inner spaces of your body, and even to your innermost thoughts. And it is a war on you. Recognizing this, the task we face seems nearly insurmountable. How are we to fight back in a war that the majority of people don't even recognize is taking place? How do we fight back against an enemy that has spent decades refining its weapons of economic and military and technological and biological control? How do we fight back in a war that is not taking place on 2 fronts or even 3 fronts, but in every domain and battlespace simultaneously? Framed like this, our prospects do appear hopeless, but therein lies the key. Our perception that it is our duty to fight back against the enemy in their war, on their battlefield, on their terms of engagement, is itself a narrative frame. And that narrative itself is a weapon that is being wielded against us in the battle for our minds. My regular viewers will understand what I'm proposing here. The creation of a parallel society. We won't achieve this by asking for more scraps from the master's table, or by gently complying as we're herded into ever more constrictive technological pens, or by thinking that we can win this war by engaging the enemy in their controlled domain. We can only achieve this by creating our own table, our own economy, and our own communities of interest. This will require the long and difficult task of increasing our independence from the authoritarian systems in every domain. The information domain, the food domain, the health domain, the monetary domain, the mental domain, and every other contested battlespace in this all out 5th generation war. Easier said than done, of course, but there is no alternative. Some will say, but won't they come after that parallel society? As if that's a rebuttal to what I've laid out here. The point is that you are already the target of the enemy, in a war that most people but dimly understand is happening. Yes, the enemy will come after you, but they are already dominating you in more ways than any one person can fully understand. That doesn't stop just because you comply with their demands, or take part in their system. We must stop playing their game. We must stop fighting their war. We must stop ceding our power, our authority, our time, our attention, our energy and our resources to engaging the enemy in their terms, on their battlefield. We must create our own parallel society, on our own terms. And so we rediscover an old piece of wisdom. To paraphrase, 5th generation warfare is a strange game. The only winning move is not to play. War is over if we want it. Your guide to 5th generation warfare.
Excavationpro
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Saved - April 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed significant changes in Jack after his reappearance in a video. He looked thinner and more subdued, reading from a script while praising China's leadership and rural education, without addressing his disappearance or the failed IPO. I also came across a troubling story about a programmer, Hu Lezhi, who claims to have been monitored and manipulated by a mind control organization since birth. He expressed deep pain and a desire to escape this world, highlighting the alarming use of brain-computer technology for control and manipulation. It feels like we are in a prolonged state of war.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

#china

@ZyanBizBoost - Zyan

January 2021: Jack finally reappears in a short video. But he completely changed: - Thinner - Subdued - Reading from a script. He praises China's leadership and rural education. No mention of his disappearance. No mention of the failed IPO. A complete new human. https://t.co/FGEvBvcHWr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jack Ma reappeared in a video after a nearly three-month absence, addressing rural teachers and stating they would meet after the epidemic. This caused Alibaba shares to rise, increasing the company's valuation by $58 billion. Ma's disappearance followed his criticism of China's regulatory system and state-run banks at the Bund Summit in October 2020. Subsequently, the Ant Group's IPO was suspended, and Alibaba faced an antitrust investigation, losing $140 billion in value. Ma's absence from scheduled appearances fueled speculation that he faced repercussions similar to Meng Hong Wei or Fan Bingbing. The rise of the Ant Group reportedly put Alibaba at odds with China's financial system, and Jack Ma's popularity threatened Xi Jinping's leadership. An anti-Jack Ma campaign portrayed him negatively. Analysts suggest the Chinese government may take over Alibaba, with possibilities including nationalization, business splitting, more restrictions, or fines. Ma's recent video suggests a shift in tone, with Ma stating he is now determined to devote himself to education and public welfare.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now to a story of lost and found. Any idea what I'm referring to? You've seen it already. Jack Ma, the Alibaba founder. Ma has finally reappeared nearly three months after he went missing from the public eye. Jack Ma was recorded speaking to teachers from rural China. He told them, and I'm quoting, we will meet again after the epidemic is over. Someone posted this fifty second video on Twitter. It went viral instantly. Many questioned its authenticity. Some questioned its date, but most chose celebration over speculation. Among them was the Hong Kong stock market. Alibaba shares were up eight and a half percent. The company's valuation rose by $58,000,000,000. Ma's reappearance is being viewed as a big relief for Alibaba and, of course, its investors. But is this story so black and white? Does does Jack Ma's reappearance promise his safety? Does it mean that Alibaba's bad days are now a thing of the past? The answer lies in history and politics. We'll discuss both. Jack Ma's previous appearance was on the second Bund Summit in Shanghai. This was on the 10/24/2020. That was the day when Jack Ma criticized China's regulatory system and state run banks. He called them out for behaving like pawn shops. Chinese authorities went after mine his empire. Alibaba's affiliate, the Ant Group, was forced to suspend its $37,000,000,000 IPO plan. China also launched an antitrust investigation against Alibaba. The company was probed for suspected monopoly practices. Alibaba's reputation took a hit. The company lost a hundred and $40,000,000,000. Jack Ma's net worth began fluctuating. Following that, he did not appear in a TV show he was supposed to judge. He also missed other scheduled appearances. His absence fueled speculation. The word was that Chinese authorities had gone after him and that he may be the next Meng Hong Wei or Fan Bingbing, the Interpol chief and the famous Chinese actress who faced the wrath of the Chinese state. Adding fire to all the speculation were some open secrets. The rise of the Ant Group had put Alibaba at odds with China's state dominated financial system. The rise of Jack Ma had put him at odds with Chinese president Xi Jinping. Everyone in China is aware of this. Like we've been telling you, Jack Ma is a poster boy of China. At home, they call him daddy Ma. Some Chinese youth call him teacher Ma. Jack Ma is seen as a godfather of entrepreneurship. To be honest, he's nothing less than a legend in China. He sings. He dances. He acts. He paints. He fights. Jack Ma's cult has begun threatening Xi Jinping's party state, a system where only one person can be celebrated, and that's Xi Jinping himself. And the dictator is not happy with the success story of Jack Ma. One headline read, there is no Jack Ma era, but a Jack Ma in the era. Chan is also running an anti Jack Ma campaign online. Reports claim that Jack Ma is being portrayed as a wolf in sheep's attire, and his venture, the Ant Group, is being painted as a loan shark. Chinese consumers are concerned, and some investors say they have no clarity as to what is going on in Alibaba. Jack Ma may not have been jailed like real estate tycoon Ren Xingjiang or billionaire entrepreneur Sunda Wu. But his company, Alibaba, is not out of danger. Jack Ma's recent video hints at the entrepreneur buckling under Chinese pressure. Just listen to what Jack Ma told the teachers. And I'm quoting, during this period of time, my colleagues and I have been learning and thinking, and we have become more determined to devote ourselves to education and public welfare. This is not only because I'm a teacher myself, but more importantly, education, especially rural education, is of great importance. Today, our country has achieved complete poverty alleviation, comprehensively promoted the rural revitalization strategy, entered a new stage of development, and is moving towards common prosperity. I'm referring to a transcript published in a Chinese outlet. And if all of this is authentic, including that video, then Jack Ma Stone has evidently taken a one eighty degree turn since his Shanghai speech. What does all of this mean? Analysts say that the Chinese government may take over Alibaba. Reports say there are four possibilities that employees in Alibaba are preparing for, number one, nationalization. Number two, splitting of the business. Number three, more restrictions. Number four, fines. Does any of this sound like the end of troubles for Alibaba? Well, you know the answer. VeeOn is now available in your country. Download the app now and get all the news on the move.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

https://t.co/CxavfP5YBo

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

Just share this on all the China posts. https://t.co/SBZqdQl311

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

" The bosses of Kuande Investment: Feng Xin and Xu Yuzhi used brain-computer weapons to persecute all company employees and former employees, and even they themselves were controlled. I am Hu Lezhi, an ordinary programmer and entrepreneur. Since October 2022, I realized that I https://t.co/ja9DzKd106

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

https://t.co/mj80DgbnlB

@Loopifyyy - Loopify 🧙‍♂️

What I could find on the guy who burnt millions of dollars and donated millions of dollars 👇: Total burnt: ~$1,650,000 (603 ETH) Total donated: ~$5,350,000 (1,950 ETH) Messages on-chain: The bosses of Kuande Investment: Feng Xin and Xu Yuzhi used brain-computer weapons to persecute all company employees and former employees, and even they themselves were controlled. I am Hu Lezhi, an ordinary programmer and entrepreneur. Since October 2022, I realized that I have been monitored and manipulated by the mind control organization since I was born. When I realized the existence of the mind control organization, they also increased their harm to me. I have been very painful in the past two years. Now I have completely lost my dignity as a human being. I have decided to leave this world and hope that this ugly world will be destroyed soon. Brain-computer chips have been deployed militarily on a large scale. All military powers are using base stations, radios and nano-brain-computer chips to control all citizens. As the brain-computer interface and mind-reading technology keeps developing, there is a new mode of crime in which wild animals become puppets or complete slaves to the digital machine. There is a new mode of crime in which the victim is gradually deprived of his senses of desire until he becomes a complete slave to the digital machine, and if one day I become a victim of the final stage, I will leave the world. 宽德投资的老总：冯鑫，徐御之使用脑机武器迫害了所有公司员工以及前员工，甚至他们自己本身也是受控者。 我是胡乐知，一名普通的程序员，创业者。自2022年10月以来，我意识到我从出生起就遭受着脑控组织的监控和摆布。而当我意识到脑控组织的存在时，他们也在加大对我的伤害，这两年我过得非常痛苦，现在已经到了身而为人的尊严彻底丧失的地步，我决定离开这个世界，也希望这个丑陋的世界早日毁灭。 脑机芯片已经大规模军事化部署了，所有的军事强国都在用基站、无线电和纳米脑机芯片控制所有国民 随着脑机接口和读心技术不断发展，出现了一种新的犯罪模式：野生动物沦为数字机器的傀儡或完全的奴隶 目前出现了一种新的奴役受害者的犯罪模式，受害者的欲望感官被逐渐剥夺，直到最后完全成为数字机器的奴隶，如果有一天我成为了最后阶段的受害者，我会选择离开这个世界

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

Do you understand we are at WAR.. and have been for a long long long time.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

👋 https://t.co/sk2EIWRkYW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have built the Bend Police Department building and observed two identical locker rooms, one for duty uniforms and one for United Nations uniforms. They cite State House Department Publication 6227 from 1961 as an order from the United Nations instructing police departments to confiscate firearms. They assert that a foreign nation must work through the State Department to instruct police. The speaker alleges that during floods in Houston, the police department had to wear blue uniforms. They claim there are warehouses across the country filled with UN vehicles that police chiefs can access but not use until instructed by the United Nations. The speaker concludes that every city police force in the United States is part of the United Nations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I built the city of Bend Police Department building, and on the blueprints, there were two locker rooms. And both rooms were identical. But when I built the city of Bend Police Department building, I had to build two locker rooms. And I said, how come? Because this one's full filled with the duty uniforms, and this one's filled with their United Nations uniforms. If you look at State House Department Publication six two two seven, written in 1961, it's an order from the United Nations to tell the police departments to begin to find ways to confiscate our firearms. A foreign nation has to work through our state department. So all the police get instructed from the state department. We found this out in Houston, Texas when the floods happened a few years ago, and the Houston city of Houston police department had to put on blue uniforms. There's warehouses all over this country with UN Yep. Vehicles. ATAX, small vehicles in them all over this country that the chief of police has access to. He can't touch it until the United Nations tells him he has to. Every city police force in The United States is United Nations. Oh, no. I built the dish I built the city of Bend Police Department building. And on the blueprints,
Video Transcript AI Summary
El ejército chino demostró las capacidades de sus drones FPV, destacando sus grandes enjambres capaces de operar conjuntamente. **English Translation:** The Chinese army demonstrated the capabilities of its FPV drones, highlighting their large swarms that can work together.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: El ejército chino mostró las capacidades de sus tragos FPV, sus enormes enjambres que pueden trabajar juntos.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The AI skill can fly itself, reacting a hundred times faster than a human. Its stochastic motion serves as an anti-sniper feature. It uses cameras and sensors for facial recognition, similar to phones and social media apps. The device contains three grams of shaped explosive. The small explosion is enough to penetrate the skull and destroy the contents.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Skill is all AI. It's flying itself. Its processor can react a hundred times faster than a human. The stochastic motion is an anti sniper feature. Just like any mobile device these days, it has cameras and sensors, and just like your phones and social media apps, it does facial recognition. Inside here is three grams of shaped explosive. This is how it works. Did you see that? That little bang is enough to penetrate the skull and destroy the contents. They used to

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/foreign-interference-inquiry-rcmp-1.7341663

SabinehazanMD
Posted - August 12, 2025 at 3:27 AM
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 6:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This episode was censored on YouTube, but here it is. I appreciate newstart_2024 and grok for their support. I conducted trials on treatments like HCQ and IVM, witnessing their effectiveness firsthand without losing anyone. I invite those without patient experience to visit my lab at Progenabiome for invaluable insights.

@SabinehazanMD - sabine hazan md

This episode was censored on @YouTube... Here it is 👇👇👇Thank you @newstart_2024 @grok pay attention to what Drs on the frontline saw and did…REMEMBER I ran the Hcq zpack Vit C d and zinc trials and Ivm, foxy zinc with @US_FDA watching. I saw first hand treatment worked having lost no one. MD is next to my name. This is data. I recommend anyone who hasn't touched a single patient to step into my lab at @Progenabiome. What I learned was priceless…

@newstart_2024 - Camus

YouTube CENSORED This Entire Podcast Episode Dr. Sabine Hazan’s Let’s Talk Sh!t Podcast (Jan 29, 2024) WHY? Because doctors exposed: • HCQ & ivermectin SUCCESS in their clinics. • COVID vaccine injuries they’re treating daily. • How Big Pharma & tech giants COLLUDED to silence dissent. THEY DELETED IT. Not for "misinformation"—but because it THREATENED THE NARRATIVE. Think about that: 🔸 Doctors with decades of experience = "dangerous." 🔸 Fact-checkers with ZERO medical degrees = "truth." 🔸 Patients left to suffer while profits soared. THIS IS WAR. On medicine. On free speech. On YOU. SHARE THIS POST → Let’s make it IMPOSSIBLE to ignore. FOLLOW → They won’t stop us.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sabine Hazen and her panel critique a hydroxychloroquine paper, calling it a fake paper with fake data: "This is a fake paper. This is a fake data." They cite claims of "seventeen thousand people died" and "96,000 patients" in the Lancet as fraudulent, arguing no way "70,000 medical records" could be used. Xavier Ezolber analyzes data miscalculation, "data inconsistency" and "fabricated" results, criticizing the peer-review process and predatory journals that "launder scientific papers." He says, "There is a corruption in medicine," "money talks for sure," and "lobbyists control both sides of the politics." They recount frontline experiences with hydroxychloroquine–Z Pak–vitamins and ivermectin–doxycycline protocols, reporting "zero mortality, zero hospitalizations" in some cohorts and highlighting the microbiome’s role. They urge transparency, critique drug trial processes, and question vaccine strategies, stressing early outpatient treatment research.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From her private lab deep inside the bowels of Internal Study Central, the doctor is at. So let's talk shit with doctor Sabine Hazen. Speaker 1: Welcome everyone who's here, and thank you for coming, this early in the morning. And thank you, Brian, for wanting to talk shit with me about this hydroxychloroquine paper. I think most of you know me as a gastroenterologist that has been spearheading the research on the microbiome and also hydroxy. I did the clinical trial. I wrote those protocols on hydroxychloroquine, Z Pak, vitamin C, D and zinc, passed them through the FDA within twenty four hours. So I'm very familiar with all these protocols. I ran the case. No one died on my shift, even though I did a placebo controlled trial on hydroxychloroquine, Z Pak, vitamin C, D and zinc. I also did the prophylaxis protocol with hydroxychloroquine and vitamins versus vitamins alone. And we had hundreds of patients on that. And then when the vaccine rolled over, a lot of doctors were forced because it was mostly doctors that we enrolled because they were high risk. When the vaccines rolled over, a lot of these doctors were forced to take the vaccine. But we have data coming out on the hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis versus vitamin C, D and zinc. So I'm very familiar with all the ins and outs of hydroxychloroquine. Brian, you want to introduce yourself? Speaker 2: Yeah, Brian Lenzkes. I'm an internal medicine doctor practicing in California for the last twenty years, general internal medicine, really focusing on metabolic health and now learning a lot more about the gut microbiome and all this stuff. Thought was crazy a few years back. So, yeah, so I was in practice during this time and watching these things and thinking, how could we be going against everything we've always believed in? You know, how can we be relying on studies that are totally fraudulent in a way, right? And getting published in major magazines. I mean, journals, I will call magazines now probably. But yeah, it's, you know, watching it and saying, how do we not talk about natural immunity? All these things that we've known for the history of medicine all of a sudden become quackery. And so, so we were united in that and then seeing all these doctors standing up on the, you know, stairs of the Capitol saying, wait a minute, this is crazy. Here's what we're doing in practice. And we're having clinical success, but no one would listen to him, you know, Erso and Pierre Corrie and all these people and Peter McCullough, the most decorated doctor. So me just being a rank and file doctor was thinking what happened to all of our great leaders? Did they either all go insane at the same time or are they right? Speaker 1: Or are they following guidelines so much that they've forgotten about how to practice the art of medicine and how to innovate, right? So I think that's the most important. Xavier, do you want to introduce yourself? Speaker 3: Yeah, of course. Well, thank you very much for having me. So I'm Xavier Ezolber. I'm a scientific journalist and econometrician by training. That is a combination of economist and statistics. And I have prepared with a number of doctors, scientific papers, over early treatments because as Brian mentioned, I saw a lot of biases in the analysis that were conducted in meta analysis and RCTs. And therefore I've used my science, which is totally different from medical science, in order to debunk a lot of these studies starting with the Lancet, because I'm one of the rare person who has interviewed Mandeep Mehra, who was the lead author also on the Lancet Gates study. I've also interviewed one of the lead investigator in recovery asking about the dosage, and so on and so forth. So my work as a scientist is to, is a major in mass is basically to look at the methodology and the inconsistencies and because I'm a journalist as well, I'm just writing up about these inconsistencies in my media. Speaker 1: Okay. So, Brian, how do you want to do this? Because, we wanted to start, I think probably starting with the article itself, right? Speaker 2: Yeah, sounds good. You're the boss. You're the boss here. I mean, you're the researcher FDA. I'm a doc, right? All I can say is we saw clinically for sure. Speaker 1: Yeah, so here's, you know, like it's interesting you said magazines, right? And I think that's what medicine is becoming. A lot of these journals are becoming magazines. They're almost like, you know, gossip column, you know, gossip journals, right? That you hear, these celebrities are doing that and then they're not doing it. It's the same propaganda. So there's a group of journals. You know, it's funny because Doctor. Barodi and I, you know, we've been working at the protocols with COVID, the whole pandemic. He calls them predatory journals. And they're actually very smart in a way because they do have an impact factor. They're brand new journals. They send you emails constantly. Different people send you emails and they're like, Oh, doctor, we've read your paper. We would love to see you publish. And then once you publish, they're easily, they can manipulate or retract the data to make you look bad. And that's exactly what happened with me with Frontiers. Frontiers, all my colleagues knew, I didn't know that it was a predatory journal. I submitted a hypothesis on ivermectin increasing the bifidobacteria and it was accepted by the peer review. Nobody criticized the articles that I picked or anything like that. And then next thing you know, nine months later, because this paper was the number one read at Frontiers with 59,000 views of doctors reading this paper, finding interesting, it was an interesting hypothesis, right? Because we're seeing ivermectin has a role potentially in cancer. So maybe increasing the bifidobacteria is how we're doing it, right? So because it got so much attention, because it really lit up ivermectin, which they don't want to do. You understand? Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are out of patents. So because they're out of patents, you cannot make any money on these drugs. The most you could sell them for is like $300 Pharmaceutical companies are no longer interested in $300 drugs. They're interested in orphan drugs where they can get name your price for a drug. They're no longer interested. And even the drug, the diseases, they basically find, you know, some kind of weird genetic pattern and say, oh, this is a rare condition. We're going to put it under an orphan and now we can bill whatever we want. So, you know, the and you and I have seen, you know, the Remicade, you know, we went, I went from Prilosec, which was at the time probably about a couple $100, right? And then we went to biologics, which that was a huge jump, right? From like $300 to $10,000 a month. And they got away with it. Then all these companies started copying and doing biologic at $10,000 a month. So the problem is they don't want to go back. They want to move forward. Now granted research is expensive. You need to pay for these things, etcetera. And the cost of research has gone up. But there is a movement that is controlling the research and stopping innovations that is stopping, you know, out of patent drugs, drugs that are basically, you know, like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. So I think that's the number one thing and the attacks on that. Speaker 2: And I think it's important for people to realize too, when you look at a medical journal, in between every single article, you can't get an article without seeing pages and pages of ads. Those aren't free. Right? They're paying money for that, first of all. And then if you want your study to get out to people, have to pay for reprints. And it's a money making venture. Right? And you say something that they're not going to like or they're going to lose some sponsorships, they're going to say, okay, we're not publishing this paper. And so that's what's happening is we've been captured. Money talks for sure. Speaker 1: And here's the thing, right? If you're leading the government, right? You have an economy to support and you have health of the people to support, right? The problem with this pandemic is that the pandemic started focusing know, when they involved all of us and all of us doctors were basically, wait a minute, I could die from this virus. I better get involved. I better figure this out. Right? I mean, I think that's what happened to you. You started looking up the journals. You started looking up clinicaltrials.gov. You know, my protocols and after Didier Raul, so I, like you guys, I read the papers of Didier Raul. The thing that impressed me about the papers, the initial paper in French was, and I speak French, so I was able to read it, was the fact that here's a man who, because they, France had COVID before we had it in America, or at least before we were made aware that we had it, right? And here's a man who was in a hospital exposed to all those patients and he's older. So he's in that high risk category and yet he survived, right? So that was the first thing. And then I read the paper and I started looking at his work, doing nasal swabs, on a weekly basis. I think he was doing nasal swabs. He was collecting stools. I mean, this man did meticulous work in research, right? And so I started being inspired by that. I said, well, you know what, maybe hydroxychloroquine is certainly a safe product. So in March I started researching my protocol and started writing the protocols. And yes, they were like contraindications to hydroxychloroquine. There were three pages of medications. You have to practice medicine and still be vigilant as a doctor. But ultimately the protocol was approved by the FDA within twenty four hours. And in fact, it was approved to say, move to market. Go ahead, Doctor. Hazen, just take your combination, start giving it to patients, proceed. Okay. That was what it was. Twenty four hours later, somebody must have called from the politics or the lobbyist that controls both sides of the politics, right? And said, wait, wait, we can't have a cheap drug. It's going to kill the market and then it's not going to start our protocol. Right. Which interestingly enough, at the same time about this, after the protocol was approved, I got a letter from Bill Gates that basically said, when do you think you're gonna, you were anticipating finishing your protocol? Why is Bill Gates interested in my little protocol? I thought he was going to invest personally. So I'm like, Oh, I've been in the clinical trial business for like thirty years. Don't worry, it's going out there, right? Well, lo and behold, you know, my protocol took forever. My protocol had a lot of, you know, like ups and downs. A month later it got approved by the IRB and then went on Twitter, Twitter destroyed it because it was an open label. I had to go back to the FDA and say, look, I'm going to do vitamins versus hydroxychloroquine with the vitamins. And then finally a month and a half later, it got into motion to start. By then it was destroyed by the politics. This was a political move to destroy a drug and unfortunately, you know, supported probably or whispered, you know, to the politicians by the lobbyists. That's exactly what happens when the Lancet paper came out and we all discovered it was BS essentially. We knew, right? This is wrong, right? Because hydroxychloroquine is the safest drug. Now this paper and why I didn't speak the whole time because you heard about Zelenko, you heard the frontline doctors and great because they were speaking, trying to save as many lives. You know, one of the criticism I got on my protocol was why did I spell out the drugs hydroxychloroquine with the dosages, Z Pak with the dosages, vitamin C, D and zinc. Why didn't I just leave it a Haze D Pak, right? Because then nobody knows, it's proprietary. There's no secret that's leaked out to the doctors. That wasn't my point. My point on April 3, when it was approved by the FDA and it went into the clinicaltrials.gov, we were number two or three. The two protocols went online on clinicaltrials.gov in America, number two and three in 04/02/2020. Why did I do that? To sound the alarm and say, look, this is what I think happens, right? On the other side, we found COVID in the stools and we discovered that actually hydroxychloroquine and Z Pak made the virus disappear. You had it at baseline, five to eight days later the virus disappeared. Problem is, you know, it does destroy the microbiome as well. So you have to be selective on which population you're going to give it, right? Every antibiotic has a risk of killing the microbiome, right? And even drugs like hydroxychloroquine. But on a safety level, you know, wrote about it. It got approved by the FDA within twenty four hours. It was safe, right? So this paper is to me is not just, you know, I'm not going to criticize it and say, oh, well they overdosed. I'm going to say, no, this is a fake paper. This is a fake data. There is no way that four or five authors took 17,000 records, medical records. Now they probably took the death certificate. You can alter the death certificate. Lobbyists can pay people to like, you know, hey, you know, I mean, we've seen you and I, Brian, physicians that are on the other side that are getting paid by legal to bring, you know, cases to lawsuits, right? We've seen that. A death certificate does not make the case. Going to court and presenting your case makes the case. If you look at this paper, there is no way 70,000 medical records were taken. First of all, you need the authorization of the patient to get medical records from the hospitals. So that's why it's a fake paper. Much like the 96,000 patients that was in the Lancet. I saw that paper and I said, wait a minute, Australia doesn't even have COVID yet. Why are there patients in that paper of COVID? And you're going to tell me 10 people evaluated ninety six thousand patients with their smoking history. I'm in the clinical trial business. It takes me a year and a half to evaluate a 100 patients. Okay. And to analyze them like the hydroxychloroquine paper, we're still analyzing the data. We're like three years out. It's very time consuming to do these studies properly. So when you see a number like ninety six thousand, that's fraudulent. When you see seventeen thousand people died, that's fraudulent right off the bat. I don't even need to know how much they got because it's fraudulent. The second thing is if you look at the guidelines and then I'm gonna have Xavier jump in. If you look at the guidelines on hydroxychloroquine, there are no guidelines that tell you to test for toxicity, None. So, you know, where did that come from? Right? The second thing is if you look at, you know, the NIH chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine toxicity, the paper itself says both chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine have excellent oral absorption and bioavailability. Both have a long and variable plasma elimination half life and about half the drug metabolites. Basically there's no comment. Does not appear to cause harm to the fetus or the mother, both excreted in breast milk, which we know. And basically the only thing that they're questioning, and I wish Richard Urso was here. Speaker 2: He's here, which came true. I just saw him pop in. Was like, yes. Speaker 1: Yeah, Richard will tell you the only thing he's concerned about is the retinal toxicity with hydroxychloroquine. But your patient is in the intensive care. He's dying. You don't care about retinal toxicity. He's dead. It doesn't matter that he's got retinal toxicity. He's under the ground in one day. That's it. Speaker 4: The retinal toxicity is chronic and it's over a course of maybe getting, you know, two kilograms over your lifetime. And and so in general, I did toxicity studies on the drug in the nineties. It's basically around five point five milligram per kilogram over an extended period of time might get some toxicity. I've never known a cardiologist taking a patient off. After this thing came up, I asked 14 cardiologists here in Houston if they've ever taken a patient off of of this drug because of the QT interval issues, and not single one had ever done it. And in the meta analysis from 2,018, going back over, sixty four years of studies of usage, there were eighteen people all time that have died of that they thought may be attributed to hydroxychloroquine. And chloroquine was also had a few, but hydroxychloroquine was 18. So it's almost insanity to say that that was the cause of it because the drug's been around forever. And I think you've heard me say Sabine about all the side effects. Lowers the D dimer, sed rate, C reactive protein, decreases atherosclerosis, improves the bone health, decreases the cholesterol level, decreases hemoglobin A1C, and glucose tolerance is improved. It improves seventy percent chance of improvement in chronic kidney disease for those people at risk, decreases stroke, heart attack, pulmonary embolism. It's actually one of the best drugs you could ever take. It's almost insanity. Like you said, it's useful in pregnancy and never had a toxicity issue. It's something that comes up multiple times. So yeah, it's a completely corrupted study, just like the Surgisphere study. Speaker 2: Yeah. And just from a primary perspective, I've been practicing for twenty years. Never once ever until these last couple years has anyone said, why are you prescribing hydroxychloroquine? Now all of a sudden it's like, can't get it. If you do a short course, you can't get it. If you prescribe a month, they would fill it because they think it's for a rheumatologic condition. Right. So it's just amazing to see the politics just jump in to say, you can't fill this medicine. Speaker 3: And they Speaker 2: had tons of surplus. There was tons of supply because I asked four pharmacists that were friends of mine. They go, we have tons of supply. That's not the issue. It's just that the powers of be said we can't prescribe it. Speaker 1: I gave it. So I had a homeless in my office during COVID and the wife had arthritis and I gave it to the wife for arthritis. And the pharmacist in front of everyone said, no, you're lying. It's for COVID. Embarrassed my patient who's a homeless, right? And basically he comes back crying saying the pharmacist didn't want to give it to me. And here's a patient that was getting it prior to that, right? And that was CVS. And I went on Twitter and I said, this is ridiculous. We can't even treat for arthritis anymore. We have to like stop hydroxychloroquine. Now I'm not saying hydroxychloroquine is a great, you know, miracle drug for everybody, you know, certainly that population that, you know, Richard was describing, that has chronic disease, probably zero bifidobacteria to begin with, they're your severe patients. That's who you really reach out to. I'll tell you one of the biggest lessons I learned on the pandemic was the use, because I went through both protocols, right? I had hydroxy Z Pak vitamin C, D and zinc. And I had ivermectin doxycycline vitamin C, D and zinc. And I felt that ivermectin doxycycline was just a better protocol. When I was treating from severe patients to mild, I realized there's a, you can stratify the treatment of these patients to make it better. Those who have a good microbiome, you want to improve that microbiome. You want to get that microbiome going to fight. You don't want to destroy it. When you have patients that are basically severe oxygen desaturating. And that was one of the things that I discovered as I was treating these patients in the placebo group, right? Because remember, I don't know who's getting, I'm doing the placebo controlled trial with the FDA watching. I don't know who's getting placebo and who's getting the real stuff, right? So at the beginning I was watching them like on an hourly basis, they had my cell phone. So when at 02:00 in the morning they're crashing, I don't know what they got, right? They could have gotten hydroxychloroquine. My first instinct was, well, let me give them the real hydroxychloroquine. Maybe they got placebo. But what about if they got the placebo, if it wasn't the placebo and they already got hydroxychloroquine. So now I'm double dosing, right? So I was in that situation and guess what? That's when I discovered, wait a minute, I got to up the vitamin C, I got to up the vitamin D, I got up the ivermectin to increase their oxygen. It was all on the frontline of treating these people that didn't want to go to the hospital. They were dying. And I have videos of that, of people that were couldn't breathe, short of breath, oxygen's in the seventies, eighties, and they survived. Everyone survived. So there was a role for hydroxychloroquine. Also I had patients that were, if you'll remember patients sometime in August when Pierre Corie and FLCC all started writing ivermectin, we had two groups, right? We had the Peter McCullough frontline, myself, we were the hydroxychloroquine, Z Pak, vitamin C, D and zinc. And then we had another group Pierre Corrie and the FLCC that was the ivermectin. Right. I was kind of in between because I was running both trials. And in July we submitted the ivermectin doxycycline trial. So I discovered the power of ivermectin. When my patient was dying or I didn't know what they got. I said, well, you know what? Let me give them ivermectin. When one of my patients was heading to the hospital and he had thirty six milligrams of ivermectin and I told him, Hey, your oxygen is in the sixties. Why don't you stop at McDonald's and get like, you know, hamburger, which was like a fatty meal that I thought of garbage food, but it didn't matter, you know, happy meal before he goes to the hospital, what the hell? And he took the thirty six in one shot. By the time he got to the hospital, his oxygen was 92%. The doctor said, whatever doctor he's in is doing, just follow her. And I'm like, woah, thirty six milligrams of ivermectin, but I just gave him hydroxychloroquine. You know what I mean? So that's when I realized the combination and in those sick sick patients, you really have to do everything to save them. The problem is that, we're working with these guidelines and these hospitals are supported by pharmaceutical companies. When Gilead pays a hospital a $100,000 per patient to try the drug, you know, the hospital's going go, you know what, let me give, you know, let me give remdesivir, right? They're not going to give a cheap drug like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. It's not on the road. Speaker 4: One of the awful things Will was the you know I remember talking to Deborah Birx and saying hey you know this is a respiratory virus it's maybe alive for five to seven days you can't use something to affect the RERP at day 20. It doesn't make any sense. And literally, I think a lot of people had no awareness of the life cycle of respiratory viruses. She clearly didn't. And it surprised me because a lot of people were not aware of the fact that a respiratory virus is basically all of them, adenovirus, rhinovirus, all of them are very short lived. And somehow that that still they pressed this whole remdesivir thing when it clearly couldn't be effective. So, it's crazy. The other thing about your comment is that the combo does help because mechanistically there's different ways that they're affecting. And I think one of the things I like late in the disease, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine affect neutrophil extracellular traps, ivermectin blocks the CD-one 147 receptor. They can both help in the late disease when it was really bad delta and the first few variants where you had all the blood clotting. I think they both could have, been useful. But of course, they use those toxic doses. So, of course, hydroxychloroquine giving toxic doses was a big deal. Speaker 1: But but even there, let's talk about the the toxic dosage. Even there, you know, is there such a thing as a toxic dose? Right? Like I asked my husband who's a cardiologist and I said, have ever checked for levels of patients that have been on a hydroxychloroquine? He's like, no, never. Speaker 4: And it Speaker 1: affects my pathologist because yesterday sent me a death certificate of one patient where the doctor put death from hydroxychloroquine. And I said, I called my pathologist and I said, how do you check that the patient, how do you know that the patient died from hydroxychloroquine versus the virus versus another co infection? Nobody did a stool sample. Nobody called me and said, we'll test the microbiome to see if there's mycoplasma in there. It could have been a combination of mycoplasma in there. They could have been other viruses. These people are immunosuppressed in the hospital. Of course, they're going to have other viruses. The nurse comes in, there's different strains of COVID that came into play. So all that played a role. You know, it's fascinating to me that my pathologist said there's no guidelines, there's no levels where you say that there's a toxic level and the patient died from toxicity of hydroxychloroquine. But I'll jump to Xavier because Xavier did an intense research on that, on the papers. So go ahead, Xavier. Then I'll Thank Speaker 3: you very much, Kevin. I'm gonna try and summarize what we did. And by way of background, I think it's very important to explain the situation in France right now because Didier Raouf, the lead of IHU, Professor Raouf has been under attack by a large number of government officials and also doctors to try and discredit the work they have done. That study is part of the defense, that they're trying to put in place in order to discredit the work. Now, the way we worked with my team of scientists around that, it's a combination of, medical doctors and mathematicians, statisticians, because we looked at all the biases And here you're talking about the biochemistry mechanism with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and how it works. But this study is a calculation. And one of the, we've basically we've broken that into three parts. Part number one is what are the data miscalculation that we've actually observed? Part number two is it fabricates some results and therefore these results are false. But the most important element is that it's been peer reviewed. And for me, it demonstrates the failures of peer review. And here we have to improve the peer review process in order to prevent papers of these natures to actually get into that. So the study, if I actually looked at what we have actually identified as data miscalculation, Of course, the results of sixteen thousand deaths calculated that should have been calibrated to reality. And it's enough to actually look at pharmacogenes data and these are in existence. So one of the buyers is they have not actually calibrated this to reality. And just that as a mathematician, from my perspective, it demonstrates that these individuals are not trying to represent what happens in the real world, they are trying to represent what they want to actually demonstrate. And that in mathematical modelling is called a dependent model. Now the second element we've looked at is the actual data of each individual country and the data for Belgium, because there's a Belgium doctor called Veronik Bodu, she's actually very much in tune with, what happens in Belgium. And she worked out that it's impossible, okay, that the numbers that were found out for deaths that they model can actually, be that number. There are several factors, there's published data, there's research that we're actually done and conducted. And these figures do not correspond to the data. And that's one of the bias because if one of the country that you try to represent an overestimation of deaths or an over death estimates is wrong, then definitely you will end up by having biases in the results and the result being fabricated. Now, if you look at the code guidelines for ethics of conducting research, there are two elements that should form the basis for a lead of concern or retraction because here we're talking about structuring response to a published letter in a way that we can address each of the biases and that we make it easy for the editor to look at the research and say, okay, well, on balance there is an issue. Now you have to imagine it's very hard for a chief editor to retract a paper because it basically shows that you've done something wrong and you have to question this. And it's very hard for them to actually accept. Speaker 1: Unless it's a predatory journal. And it's very easy to bypass the peer reviewers and go straight to the editor, pay him money and we track the journal. Speaker 3: So what we did is we structured our response to the editor in a way that we can demonstrate that there are data inconsistency and miscalculation and that the results are fabricated. Let me just give you an example. They calculate the mathematical function that they use in order to calculate the estimation of deaths that would have, I would say would, because it's not real, that would have died from, absorption of hydroxychloroquine, uses an ingoing hypothesis, which is the odds ratio issued from the Axforce Research of one point one one. That basically means that, eleven percent would have died, from absorption of hydroxychloroquine over, standard of care of placebo. We don't know. Now, if you look at the Axforce research, it has basically two types of studies within that. It has studies with low dose and has studied with high dose and they only use the bias or odds ratio of 1.11, because if they had used the other ratio from low dose, it would have been 0.97 and therefore their model would have actually failed. So when you use a constant and you apply that 11%, you will only find this. You cannot find zero. And so that in itself demonstrates that the model they used is totally biased. The other element is a lot of the data are dependent on one another. So for example, and I'm not a medical doctor, however, I've tried and understand the process that a patient has. If you deprive a patient from early treatments, then it has a loss of chances and it has a chance of progressing to ICU. That's a probabilistic model. And of course, some patients, they actually recover by themselves, but then for those that aggravates, they have a probability and then they are hospitalized, they have a chance to move to ICU and they have a chance of dying. Now, the model that they use is therefore not taking into consideration the fact that patients may have had a loss of chance of being treated early. And therefore just this, which is not used in a model, demonstrate also the weakness of any form of probabilistic model. That in itself, it's a very high level summary without going into the medical element that you've just discussed. The fact that we do not have pharmacoviligence data for hydroxychloroquine deaths that the high dose of course would have to actually be controlled. And this is what actually has happened with the DDRO sort of hospital in Marseille. They have controlled the patients to whom they gave ACQ. And there is a 30,000 strong databases, which has been published of all the patients that have been treated that demonstrate that there is a significant improvement or there's an odds ratio of something like zero point five five over, the chances of, of deaths. So that's, the authors, cherry picked, they cherry picked countries, they cherry picked data, they cherry picked the references that they were using. For example, they are not mentioning two studies which are dramatically important. One of them is the Yale and Al study of 2020 that demonstrate the optimum dosage. Just that if you're a medical doctor and you do not know that study and you do not reference this, then by definition, for me, you do not want to know something that you should have known or you turn a blind eye on something and that demonstrate again some of the weaknesses of that. And the second, element is of course this OR calculation, which is derived at 75% from the recovery study. Now the recovery study has used a protocol of two point four gram of hydroxychloroquine salt. It's of course one hundred and fifty five milligram per tablet. So it's less in days, in day number one and it's 9.6 gram over ten days. That in itself increased the level of concentration, due to the long life of, the long life of hydroxychloroquine in the plasma. But another element that they should have actually learned from Yao and Hal is that in the lung cells, the concentration of hydroxychloroquine is something like 400 times higher. So therefore they are not deriving the elements of science that they should have derived when they are doing their discussion. So this OR is definitely wrong. Now I ask myself another question, which is why did they not apply this data to The UK data, to this model, to The UK data? Because they're using an OR, as their constant, the 1.11 from Axforce, which is 75% of its weight issued from UK data. So calibration number one is you would want to calibrate this to UK data. And the answer is quite simple. If they had applied this model to The UK data, then they would have found zero deaths. Or the estimate of deaths would have actually been nil because there is only one study in The UK that has given hydroxychloroquine and that is recovery. And recovery concludes that there is no difference between placebo and hydroxychloroquine. Now we know it's high dose. We know there are some issues with this. And however, that demonstrate that the odds ratio being non significant then there is no difference in efficacy and they also conclude that there is no death issues. Now we are not going to argue about recovery which I could do, it's totally different. It's also a bias study and the results are totally biased and for me it's another fraud. But if you're saying that there could not have been any estimated of deaths in The UK based on this OR calculation, then in my view that explains why they don't apply this model to The UK. Now turning to The U. S, there is another PhD in IT in France, Eminelle Dahl. She has identified she has looked at the data and she recalculated the data and they're estimated that there is something like eighty thousand, sorry, eight hundred thousand hospitalized patients in The US. She looked at the CDC data, over the same period and she cannot actually reconcile that data. So just simple data validation, data calibration, which is what you would do in any mathematical model, try to calibrate to reality is what you actually measure and calculate through your model has formed some links with reality and it has no link with reality. So we've prepared a letter which we've issued to the editor. It's now being reviewed. We work quite extensively on that. But for me, the third point, which is the peer review process is the one, that is the most problematic because of course here we know that these are just fabrication of results. Now, how can you fool a peer review process? Well, first of all, in peer reviews, and here it's totally blind. So I like blind things, but when a peer review process of this nature is totally blinded, it's very hard to actually look at how they actually did it and who did the peer review. In my view, this peer review has been done, it's complacent and it lacks a methodologist or somebody that would have a background such as mine that would have actually done not a medical read of this, but somebody that has no knowledge whatsoever of medical science and that just asks simple questions like I just did. Because what you see is what you get and in modeling here is garbage in garbage out and the garbage is pretty easy to identify just as I have done. Now I looked at the other processes from other journals, which are more transparent, like for example, the BMG. In the BMG, you can publish a rapid response, but you can also see the review process and the questions. You have an idea of the background of the individuals. Now I've looked at a number of studies and there's very few methodologies, there's very few mathematicians that look at these. And in my view, just by having somebody outside of your own field of expertise, doing the acid test, the reality test, would help. And that's where I believe there is some issue. So that's more or less what we actually identified are the major issues of this paper. Speaker 1: Thank you. That was very, very thorough. And I absolutely agree with you. Incidentally, feel sorry for Doctor. Raul because he is being attacked. And the same people that are attacking him and retracting his paper and my paper yesterday sent me an email showing me a death certificate of one patient that died from hydroxychloroquine. Of course, we know that the death certificate doesn't mean anything. It's really about the medical records. And secondly, toxic drugs, nobody in the, first of all, Brian, you and I are in California. Speaker 2: I'm in Arizona. I sit in Arizona. Speaker 1: I'm sorry, Arizona. Speaker 2: No, I'm from California, but AB 2,098 chased me out. Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm sorry. But you were in California at the beginning. Speaker 2: I'm in both. Speaker 1: Yeah, so at the beginning there was no, the patients were not getting hydroxychloroquine in the hospital. My hospital was not giving it. They had a thousand cases. Nobody was discharged. One patient wanted ivermectin never got in in the hospital. Hospitals were not dispensing hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin in California. So I don't know how they got that 880,000 cases. And that the majority, I forgot the number. Hold on. I will tell you here USA eight hundred and eighty eight thousand and supposedly five hundred and fifty one thousand were exposed to hydroxychloroquine. Which hospital was giving hydroxychloroquine? We have actually with us, Alan Miller, Doctor. Miller, who is by the way, one of the top clinical trial doctor in the country has been with me. We were pulling our hair at the beginning of the pandemic and he helped me write the protocol at the beginning when we were trying to figure it out. And, you know, Alan, I consider a good friend and he's been very righteous and he's been doing clinical trials like me for two decades almost, right Alan? And Alan's treated a lot of patients. So Alan, you want to talk about toxic drugs and toxicity of hydroxychloroquine? As an internist, you've written hydroxychloroquine probably more than I have. Speaker 5: I've written hydroxychloroquine for thirty years, maybe longer. If you go back to medical school, thirty five. I've never seen a patient die from hydroxychloroquine. In fact, when you look at, if you just think just logically, I don't know of any physician in The United States, or maybe globally, who writes any dose that would be remotely toxic at all. Doses of two hundred, four hundred, six hundred milligrams of hydroxychloroquine daily, every day, whatever you want to give, are not toxic. The drug is cleared very quickly. You know that because it's a BID drug, right? If it was a drug that had had a, you know, a large volume distribution, it also had a half life. What I'm trying to say is it basically is cleared quickly. And so to claim that it's toxic is actually somewhat ludicrous. The interesting thing about what you said, and I remember when we were looking at these papers, is it is almost impossible, I mean, literally impossible within weeks to collect data on ten, twenty, thirty, forty, 50,000, 100,000 patients. In normal clinical trials, I've done about 125, or so clinical trials. I currently have about eight or 10 in my office, mostly cholesterol, some diabetes, some hypertension. It takes years, I mean, sometimes to collect all that data, and that may just be on two or 3,000 patients. So to do any type of retrospective analysis on thousands of patients at hospitals or anything all over the globe is absolutely a farce. And whenever you see that, that immediately will tell you that that is a garbage paper and just throw it through the trash. It means nothing. As far as the death death certificates, death certificates in hospitals are often, done by the ancillary staff. A doctor will come by and just basically sign his name. When a patient is very acutely ill and passes away in an intensive care unit, there are hundreds of three things that are going on and many that we don't even understand. So when we actually write death certificates and you say hydroxychloroquine causes, that would be impossible to actually validate. So I think, you know, what we should probably start doing is just calling out things as they are. The papers are frauds, the people that are out there are criminals. They're basically, you know, shills for certain, you know, areas of pharma. And that doesn't mean all pharma is bad. Okay? There are some people in pharma I know that are really good and really trying to do what they think is right. So I I think in this scenario, you basically have Speaker 1: But they're being killed by the people that are doing stuff like that. Speaker 5: Oh, for sure. Speaker 1: And the lobbyists are not doing a favor to pharma by doing stuff like that. Right? Because ultimately who's controlling this and supporting pharma is the lobbyists, right? Lobbyists control both sides of the politics. We saw it. That same lobbyist firm control, supports Trump and Biden. So both sides are playing this narrative, which is convenient because it creates a controversy, which sells drugs, which sells vaccines. Remember during the elections, was Kamala Harris and Pence were basically talking. The three questions were vaccines, vaccines, vaccines. Marketing 101, you repeat things three times, it gets branded into the person's brain. That was not an electorial questioning. That was a marketing ploy to get into our brains vaccines before the vaccine trials even came out or while the vaccines were Speaker 5: Beyond vaccines. Speaker 1: That's the other thing. You know that I have been in the clinical trials too long, you know, 150, 120 for you, 300 plus for me. I did vaccine studies. I just got a trial for a vaccine study right now on my desk. And I'm looking at it and I go, Oh, that's a real vaccine and not a genetic sequence, right? Speaker 5: That's correct. Speaker 1: There's a difference. They're trying to shove down our throat this new technology that is dangerous, that has not been tested. That if you look at mice studies or rat studies where they are given, you know, messenger RNA, they are chewing their arms. They're in such pain. Animal studies are telling you that, you know. And let's go back to the original animal study on these vaccines where they killed the monkeys after one week. What can you get of data from animal studies? Couldn't you let them live a little bit longer to see if they develop something? So there is a fraud that occurred in medicine. There is, I hate to say this, but it's like, again, the economy, it's like the vaccine could make more than the early treatment and they weren't ready with Paxlovid. One question that I have, and I know Brian you've used it, Alan you've used it. What happened to the monoclonal antibodies? They came and went. I was, my patients were doing great with that. What happened to that? So it didn't fit their stock that they were trying to bring up, right? That's what it's all about. And here's the problem. When we interfere with research, we screw ourselves up, right? Because ultimately we're cheating research. We're cheating us as the patients. My aim when I ran this trials was to see the truth myself. Had, and I think Alan, when you started treating patients, you were like, wait a minute, these vaccines are a new technology. It's not really a vaccine, early treatment. How many patients did you treat at the beginning? Remember in March, were collecting my stools. Alan Miller was my collector of poop. He was going to houses and saying, Doctor. Ozan is looking for the virus in your stools. And he was collecting them for me. So, you know, he risked his life on the frontline. He was in front of everybody and he saw firsthand these people were surviving, right? Did you lose anyone in this pandemic, Alan? Speaker 5: No, I probably treated 1,000 patients maybe. I don't even remember. I lost track. I didn't lose anybody. In fact, I saved one of my friends who's in a band. He had really horrible GI COVID. He was really sick. And, we got gave him hydroxy and Z Pak. And within, forty eight hours, he was basically better. And he gave me a guitar. I mean, so Speaker 1: I know you with guitars. Speaker 5: Yeah. So I collect guitars. So, you know, I I didn't lose any I know Brian, we don't we've never really met, but we've heard of each other. I just haven't seen it and I don't expect to see it. And I think if you look at how these drugs work, especially hydroxychloroquine is a zinc ionophore and ivermectin with, you know, blocking import protein and all the other things it does, these drugs have zero ability really for toxicity. And they're about as safe as they come, which is really crazy considering that remdesivir, which was pulled from the Ebola trials, as you may remember, because it basically caused renal failure or respiratory failure, some other kind of failure, organ system failure, in about fifty to seventy percent of the patients. It's really, unbelievable. But listen, I've got to go back and see some more patients. I'm in Atlanta. I'll get back on a little bit. Speaker 2: Alright? Thanks doc. Thanks. Speaker 5: No problem. No problem. Speaker 2: And I'll jump in and say I had zero mortality, zero hospitalizations, And we're living fear with the medical board by saving our patients and preventing hospitalizations. And that's what's insane about that. Right. And that's why I started looking at the insanity. I would love to hear both of you, Xavier and Sabine. What about this draws in paper that came out PCR? They submit that from my understanding and looking at it, didn't sleep for a week when I read this that they submit on December 22, It gets published December 23. What kind of peer review can you possibly do in a few hours and then have press releases all over the world the next morning? I mean, just from a common sense perspective, you go. Speaker 1: That's what they do. Right? That's what they do. They publish this, big title like seventeen thousand people die from hydroxychloroquine mortality, right? They publish these papers. They go all over the media because they control the media. Remember the lobbyists control the media, both sides of the media, right? Fox and CNN. So they control the media and they push all this narrative out there. Everybody only hears hydroxychloroquine mortality, right? Then they're gonna retract it in about probably a month because Xavier is gonna make some noise. I'm gonna make some noise. You're gonna make some noise Brian. And then they're gonna say oh wait wait wait, you know, we got to retract it. But they're never gonna report it to the media like they did with the Lancet study. Did it go did the media start talking about Lancet? Oh that paper was fraudulent. No. Everybody still thinks that that Lancet paper didn't work. Know that that was a real study that hydroxychloroquine doesn't hear. It doesn't work. I hear it from like friends of mine that are in academia and they're like, they're quoting that paper. I'm like, didn't you know this paper was retracted? Speaker 2: Not only that it's even worse. Like Paul Thacker just was showing that this six foot apart rule came from an article someone wrote in the New York Times. Like now you have the World Health Organization referring to the New York Times as their source of They worldwide Speaker 1: get their narrative. Right. It's interesting because Speaker 3: Sabine, if I may interject, one of the issue here is called, you know, in money, you have money laundering. Here what they are doing is they are laundering scientific papers. And that's definitely a very serious issue. Now, as a director of publication of the media, if you look at the charter, that you have is as soon technically speaking, as soon as you are aware of an issue, that a paper is wrong or that information has changed, then you're supposed to actually take stock of that and to actually modify your paper. Now they are not doing it because they are not following their own ethical guidelines. Because of course, as you mentioned, they are not doing journalism, they're doing propaganda. Now with these papers, one of the issues that we actually raise in our article is the fact that it has already received a lot of public attention. By definition, it's throwing a really bad eye on science because it creates wrong signs, it brings wrong impression, because the journalists that are interviewing these people are not even asking questions. They are just taking the results and they are just saying, oh, there's seventeen thousand people that have died. Now, did you check that there has been seventeen thousand records? It's simple mathematical calculation. And for me, this is the worst part of it. That's why I say we have to tighten the review process in order to avoid having those paper get out. And that's where for me we have the biggest issue because we will always end up by having people trying to do fake science. That has been forever the case, but the peer review process should be a barrier, a protection against that. And for me, that's where you have the biggest issues. And for doctors, the other element is that it throws a very dishonest evaluation on the treatment that you have been using. And that's the conclusion study of the paper that we wrote is that, if you're doing fabrication of results based on false data, what you're doing is you're simply bringing a justification and to evaluate a treatment which is a cheap treatment. And of course we all know that if you are sort of working with a pharma company you want to actually sell very expensive drugs and you don't want to actually sell cheaper. So this is quite normal to actually throw, a bad eye or a bad sort of feel, bad flavor on these treatments. And we have to prevent that from happening. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I think it's not, think about it. What happened during this pandemic, it's not only hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, it's even vitamin D and vitamin C. And this is why, Kate, are you able to talk? Because Kate was at the CDC, she presented tons of data on vitamin D, why we should be telling people to start taking vitamin D to optimize their vitamin D. And that never went out. That was never in mainstream media. That was again. Speaker 2: And that Fauci had given a talk on the benefits of vitamin D years ago, and now all of a sudden he doesn't know anything about it. Like how does Speaker 1: He that talk about vitamin C and D at some point during the pandemic. Speaker 6: Yes, did. So did Doctor. Frieden also talked about vitamin D during the pandemic, I think in 2020. Yeah, I wrote a little white paper at the March 2020 and fed it around. Worked on anthrax at CDC. I was one of the main anthrax doctors, so if you put Hendrix and anthrax into PubMed or anything, my name will pop up a lot. But I had done nutrition research before when I worked at a state health department. I had done a lot of stuff on folic acid and B12 and birth defects, so I was interested in nutrition. And then I also gave a, besides sitting around a white paper, I also gave a talk to a bunch of epidemiologists at CDC at the 2020. A lot of people were interested. A lot of people would say, Oh yeah, of course, I am on vitamin D. Everybody was always telling me that they were taking vitamin D. So I was just super disappointed that we never said anything about it, and we never looked at it because I don't really count me looking at it in my spare time as the agency looking at vitamin D. There is nobody assigned to look at that. There was nobody assigned to, look at other early treatments. I mean, when I say look at it, I mean, what I did on the anthrax was always, you know, systematic reviews where we would, you know, spend hundreds of man hours or woman hours, whatever, evaluating data, but we would, at CDC, we just kind of refer to FDA or NIH and say they had had a website. That was it Speaker 1: know, And a little you presented my data of the lost microbes to the CDC, right? Do you want to talk about like their experience of the microbiome? Speaker 6: Well, no, I just, I presented it to a few people. I didn't really present it to a large group, but Speaker 1: So it's interesting. So, but don't you think like Kate, that there's a lot of, you know, that these agencies are captured in a way by the politics, by the direction of where the government is going? You know what, I don't speculate. Well, that's probably Speaker 6: All I can say is what happened is that we didn't Speaker 1: Yeah. Won't go into the Speaker 6: There is time looking at anything like that. There was no nobody devoted time to it. Speaker 1: Well, you for all your work and everything you've done at the CDC to try to like, you know, bring on vitamin D. And, you know, I think doctors appreciated it all over. Xavier had to leave. Brian, do you want to kind of like for me, a couple of things on the paper, just why these people died. The hospital setting is not the greatest setting full of viruses. The nurses are waking you up on the hour to take vitals. The stress that it kills your microbiome. Your exposure to multiple strains of the virus and other viruses. I think that's the most common reason why people die in the hospital from COVID. So I think this paper as Xavier said, and he had to leave is fraud. And we have to start putting pressure on our government to stop interference with research and to stop publishing papers that are so fraudulently, so obviously fraudulent right out there. And we got to stop the retraction of papers that are not fraudulent. Papers like Didier Raul who did the work meticulously. You know, all that's doing. And if pharma ever listens to this is all, and Alan knows because he's working with pharma every day. And I tell them the same thing. I say, look, ultimately what it's doing is it's removing little by little doctors from trusting your drugs. Every day doctors are finding new ways to treat their patients. They're going into the nutraceuticals. They're going into the food alteration, the stress, the multiple different innovations that is going to remove the need for pharmaceutical products. I mean, I see it, I go to these, I speak at these conferences from academic conference conferences that are basically longevity conference, A four ms. They're all academic in my opinion. And these doctors are looking for other ways than pharmaceuticals. So I think if we continue in this path of retracting good papers, which we're all seeing because we're in the business of analyzing and criticizing papers. Remember Brian, we used to do a gut club together. Like as doctors, we would take a paper and start criticizing it and analyzing it and saying, okay, well this is why this is bad. And it doesn't mean anything. Let's look for another. Science is about prove me wrong, right? Is it right or is it wrong? But ultimately you don't retract. You leave it there as a symbol of a bad paper, right? Unless it's fraudulent like these papers. So, you know, the fact that they removed Doctor. Raul and all these papers on ivermectin and doctors have seen firsthand patients being treated and have seen, I've seen the effects of ivermectin on the microbiome. I know that I'm on the right path with those drugs and using those drugs. And I've seen their safety measures. So at the end of the day, start need telling if it is a lobbyist move that's pushing all this, we need to tell them to stop because it's killing the whole industry that is allowing us to do good research. Alan and I did not want to step into the pandemic and start writing a protocol at the beginning. And I wrote my protocol with my team. That was 20 fourseven for like ten days of hundreds of pages that we had to go through and the articles that we had to go through. You know, this was not easy. We didn't want to do this. And then me spending my money on this research, we didn't want to do But we felt like we needed to see the truth. We need to have righteousness in medicine and in research again. And we need to trust our doctors and we need to trust the science and we need to trust the research, but we need to trust the science understanding that science can change and evolves, right? And we need to be open minded on that. Speaker 5: You know what's interesting? There is a physician who's a rheumatologist in LA. I don't know his name. Think he may have retired by now. He was the world's largest writer of hydroxychloroquine. And when I say the largest writer, apparently he'd written over 2,000,000 pills of hydroxychloroquine in his career, something close to that, some ridiculous number. I mean, that's obviously thousands and thousands of patients, right, that they've seen in many refills. He would have been the best person probably on the planet to discuss anything about hydroxychloroquine. And not once did anybody ever interview him, talk to him, or maybe he just decided he'd want to get involved. But if you really wanted to talk to an expert, he was just down the street from Sabine. Sabine, Speaker 1: do remember Speaker 5: his name? I mean, he's really Speaker 1: You know, and I had him, I actually quoted him when I wrote the protocols. I actually quoted him when I wrote the protocols because I said this guy wrote the most hydroxychloroquine. I'm trying to find it. So I'll skip the Brighton I look forward Speaker 3: to it. Speaker 5: It's a shame that this guy, that he never was actually asked because he would have been probably, would have put the whole thing to bed. He was truly the expert. Well, think even if he did come out, Speaker 1: they wouldn't have given him a stage. Very difficult to get up on that stage and start accumulating followers and making enough noise to be noticed. Speaker 5: Yeah, I agree. But it's really astonishing. Eighty percent of the doctors in our country have lost their minds. I mean, they really have. Speaker 2: That's generous. Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, I think there's still Speaker 2: Doctor, you're generous. You're nicer than me. Speaker 4: I I think there's still Speaker 5: 20. I I will tell you a little story, just a little caveat. I think Sabine knows this. Regarding the mRNA gene therapy shots, it hit home in my call group about two and a half months ago. One of the doctors in my call group on Friday got a booster. Saturday didn't feel well. Monday night died of acute MI. And, I got a text on Tuesday morning from the guy, one of his partners, and his partner who was kind of a shot guy said, you know, Alan, I think you're right. I'm pretty sure the shot killed him. I think, this is just one example, but, I just wanted to kind of throw that out there that it hit home. Speaker 6: How old? Speaker 5: He was 61, basically healthy runner, no big nothing. Speaker 6: Wow. Speaker 5: And, I don't think he took any medications. Yeah, and then I've been to another physician, about 20 miles from me, about three or three, maybe four or five months ago, same thing. So, you know, when you hear these, when they talk about anecdotal. Yeah, Speaker 1: I mean they Speaker 5: They don't mean anecdotal. You just need basically just stories and the reality, and that'll tell you what's really going on out there. That's how they used to do it years ago. Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm bringing the next show, Brian, you and I will do, and Alan, hopefully you'll be on it. I'm bringing in a couple of patients. One of the patients that I, yesterday, my last patient of the day, healthy woman, got the vaccine and the booster. Four days after the booster she's paralyzed, wheelchair bound. Speaker 2: Really? Speaker 1: And four days. Now, Alan, you and I have been doing clinical trials long enough to know that that's a serious adverse event, right? Nobody reported it. So nobody's looking at it. It's like, oh, no problem. A good Speaker 5: site will eventually report that. I mean, will eventually have to come out of me because that, Speaker 1: I mean, we would Pfizer reached out to her and tried to mitigate to not have her speak too much. But you know, we're seeing it. I'm seeing it every day. I mean, I have hundreds of people that have been vaccine injured. Speaker 2: I There's zero question about it. I mean, I've seen it. I have four personal friends, docs, all triathletes, super fit, myocarditis, atrial fibrillation, pericarditis. Guys I've interviewed on the podcast, we've lost 150 pounds with this huge cardiac workup before they start doing low carb and keto stuff. Now all of a sudden have ejection fraction of 32%, you know, after and they couldn't talk about it. Why? Because they'll get fired from their job. Right. Because some of these people have huge profiles. If you don't say you push it. And so a good friend of mine actually who had damage to the California Medical Board, he's like, you're telling me that I can't say anything about, you know, adverse reaction that actually happened to me the day after I had this, right, who was super healthy running triathlons. So when you start seeing these things and the adverse effects after you've already had COVID and then get the vaccination within a month or so, horrific side effects. Right. So these are things as doctors, we have to evaluate and look at. It's not about being political. It's about what it is and what we're seeing. And I think that's the problem. I I have a podcast, Life's Best Medicine. I had it was taken down four times. One, Peter McCullough within seventeen seconds of being posted. Right. Everything he said was factually correct and has been proven. Another with a hospice doctor when I asked about the case he seen in the last month. Right. All factually documented, no one contacted him or me, but it was taken down for medical misinformation. A good friend of mine, Patricia Lee from USC, who presented what she was seeing to the FDA, wrote five letters with no response, came out as a whistleblower that was taken down for medical misinformation. Right. These are all doctors talking about what they're seeing in clinic. It's someone at YouTube knows this medical misinformation. Like what med school do they go to? What clinical experience do they have? And that's what I mean when we start seeing these things. And it's important for both of you that you didn't just pull these protocols out of your rectum, right? There was data on that before from the NIH and all these people who were saying this is what works. And then you didn't just pull it out, go, hey, let's just randomly pull three drugs and try it, you know? And so just looking at this study, the things that came to mind that and you too may know better than I do, but they never mentioned that they were giving zinc with the hydroxychloroquine or is it the max? So that was never given. And we know that it acts as an ionophore from Zelenko protocol and all these other things. How long did you wait to give the drug? And so even in this study says we cannot say that that prophylaxis or early outpatient, we can't make any statement about outpatient treatment, just hospitalized treatment. So once like we all know, if someone has shingles and they've had it for two weeks, you're not going to put them on an antiviral. The virus is gone already, like Doctor. Urso pointed out. And so I think all these questions and the other confounded, I don't know, may be in here, but you're better at reading than I am. But I didn't see anything about how many of these patients were also given remdesivir. Right. Because I only know personally Speaker 1: That's the other thing. Right. How much oxygen, did they ventilate those patients? What other medications did they give them? Were they interact? Was it interacting with the hydroxychloroquine? Heck, what nutrition were they on? I said that on Twitter. I said, did they all drink orange juice? Because if they all drank orange juice maybe we should blame the orange juice on the death of those patients. So I think there's so many factors that were not looked at. And again, you know, patient comes into the hospital, he's in the intensive care unit. His lung is necrotic. Okay. I mean, we've seen the pathology of these lungs. It's dead tissue. You cannot regrow a dead tissue. You need a new lung, right? So you're really giving medications to a dead person that you should have interjected early on and treated early. But I will tell you, it's interesting this whole treatment early. I've had people that I treated a month later and I gave them massive amount of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin and vitamin C, D, zinc and Z Pak or doxycycline. And you know what, they survived. I think it's at the level, and let me just say also, is it the strain of the virus that matters or is it really what your microbiome is all about, right? I had a guy that was in the middle of nowhere America in the forest, he was far from a hospital. Oxygen was desaturating, you know, and I did not, I said, what do you have? Do you have ivermectin? Do you have hydroxy? Nothing. He had vitamin C and vitamin D. Well, I managed to keep him alive till he got his ivermectin with his oxygen up with just vitamin C and vitamin D and what he had, you know, of gut health in his fridge. You know what I mean? So when you understand the microbiome is really what's gonna help you survive and that it's really, you need different bacteria. You start treating differently, right? Because you start saying, okay, well this kid has a lot of bifidobacteria. I'm not going to worry about this kid. So I'm not going to, I'm going to give him vitamins and then I'm going to give him some ivermectin if he's too miserable or doxycycline. But these severe patients, I'm going to pay more attention to them because, and I'm going to be more aggressive with them. Speaker 2: Well, that's the point when you hear it. When I hear you saying, look, have a patient with a stat of seventy percent goes up to ninety two percent within an hour or two after this treatment. You go, okay, we got to look at that at least. He's crazy. Like he got better. If he died, then you go, okay, that wasn't a good treatment protocol, right? When people are getting better, you have to sit back and look and go, wait a minute, there's something to this and not just say it's crazy all of a sudden. When you have people like, you know, I'm a fan of Doctor. Urso, Pierre Corre, they're crying going, look, we're doing this with patients and they're getting better. Let's at least look at this and like, no, we're not looking at it. It's insane, right? Speaker 1: Look at I took pictures. Okay. Pictures of my oxygen saturations of my patients. Who the hell takes pictures of patients with 73%? Most doctors would freak out. Right. I'm like, you know what? Take a picture because I know it's going to improve. Okay. This is the by the way, you could see the wedding band. It's the same guy, you know, same guy, same finger. I didn't fabricate this. Here's the wedding band again, ninety five percent. Okay? I didn't make this up. I mean, these people, I saw it with my own eyes. You know, Doctor. Barodi has a sentence on this. He says, if you see a Martian in your backyard, you're gonna start believing there's life on Mars. You don't need to do a placebo controlled trial to see if there's Martians, right? You're not gonna dissect the Martian. You're gonna say, Holy cow, there's a better Martian in my backyard. There must be life on Mars, right? This is a Martian to me. The oxygen going up was a Martian. Like holy cow ivermectin did something. And here's the thing, a physician that sees that needs to, and then you don't see it on another patient. You need to understand why. Here's what I discovered. If a patient's drinking alkaline water, it doesn't work. Because what is alkaline water doing? It's killing your microbiome, right? So I can't increase my bifidobacteria with ivermectin, which by the way, when I published that hypothesis of ivermectin increasing the bifidobacteria, I already knew the answer, right? That's why I published the hypothesis because I already had seen it, right? I saw the bifidobacteria was zero. And then after I give my patient ivermectin, bifidobacteria went up. Okay. And in fact, I published it not in a public, know, now I'm not publishing in journals anymore. I'm just writing abstracts. It's much faster. And I present them at the American College of Gastro and have gotten three presidential awards in three years. My peers are appreciating it. I love my research. They're listening. They're paying attention. I don't need to publish anymore, you know. And it's from now on people are gonna just have to follow my abstracts on my website, right? So to see the truth, which is a shame. Speaker 2: Well, and I see my patients getting better doing what you're doing. And I think that's the bottom line is like our responsibility to our patient. I don't really care what other doctors think. I really don't care. I don't care what the CDC thinks of the World Health Organization. Now, the problem we face, all three of us saying we have zero mortality from COVID is like, okay, ninety nine point nine percent of people survived COVID. Right. When we look at the data. So who was that dying and sitting down with Peter McCullough? It was the morbidly obese diabetic, you know, other diseases that were that were going to take these people out. So you go, okay, if I could prevent them from getting to the hospital, I've saved a life. Probably the only person I know of in my of anyone I know, that I personally taken care of or friends, family, neighbors, whoever I've come in contact with acquaintances. I only know of one person who died, who was getting ready for discharge. He was morbidly obese diabetic, and they put him under Envisivir the day before he was getting discharged. He decompensated, went into renal failure and died. That's the only person I know of. Right? So you look at and go, was it the remdesivir that killed him? I don't know. But he was getting ready for discharge and the paperwork's very clear on that. And he had every single risk factor of dying of COVID. So it's when you start looking at like that, it's like, oh my gosh, was getting in the hospital going to be your reason for dying? Know, was that going to was mismanagement in the hospital? I don't know. I can't judge that because I'm not a hospital doctor, but I've talked to a lot of them and I've talked to a lot of nurses. Go, there was a lot of questionable stuff that Right. And especially if this, know, we have an issue is that every single person went to the hospital, a PCR test. Well, no matter what you're there for. And the problem is you're going to it's a false positive. Like if you are asymptomatic and you get a false positive, it's like a ninety four percent false percent of false positive, right? If you're asymptomatic. Speaker 1: But here's the thing, the PCR is just a portion of the virus, right? Speaker 2: Correct. Speaker 1: It's a cheap way to analyze. We analyze stools and we looked at the whole entire genome. In fact, that data is coming to see whether the strain mattered or the level of Bifidobacteria mattered. I'll wait till after the elections because right now this is like very bad time to start publishing stuff, which is too bad by the way, because my research, a lot of it would help. You know, I'm a Malibu physician. I treat celebrities. I treat billionaires. You know, I mean, nobody's put me on people magazine of killing them, right? So clearly I'm doing something right, right? So ultimately my way has some methodology to it. I've been doing clinical trials, over 300 clinical trials. I've read all these protocols. I have an insight that nobody has. And on top of that, I'm doing research on the microbiome. You would think that people would wanna know how did I come to like lose no one? How did I come to publish on hypoxic patients? You know what I mean? It's unbelievable to me that the people that spoke this pandemic were the people and the experts were the people that stayed in their basement. You know, I think of like, you know, Doctor. Jaw, how many patients did he treat? He was talking from his house. I didn't see him in the hospital touching a patient. It's a different story when you are on the frontline treating patients, you discover things, right? You discover, well, first of all, you don't give hydroxychloroquine with a full stomach. You actually, it's better on an empty stomach because it gets into the cells with that and changes the pH of the cells to alkalinity. So when the virus gets in, it gets killed. Well, you learn that so you're not gonna interfere that mechanism with food, right? You're not gonna give ivermectin on an empty stomach. It gets absorbed better with a fatty meal, Right? So there's different timings, right? Like when I did my protocol and I treated my patients, there was a different time factor that I gave. And I started learning like, how do I treat better? How do I, you know, towards the end I was so after Delta, Delta kind of killed me with so many patients. I think I had like 50 patients a day sometimes. And, you know, one of my friends, Nina is on there. She'll tell you, she would be texting me all the news and I'm like, I don't care. I don't care who's going to be president. I don't care who's politician. It doesn't affect me. What affects me right now is me surviving and then my patients surviving, right? So after Delta, I was kind of like burnt out and I was just becoming so aggressive to treat everyone because I wanted quick treatment to be done with the patient, right? Because you don't have the luxury on the frontline treating 50 patients a day to say, okay, I'm gonna hesitate. And let me tell you, I was not the nicest physician with these patients because if they hesitated and they're like, well, I don't wanna take the Trump drug. I was like, okay, you know what? Start digging your grave. It's not my problem. Done. You know what I mean? Because it's a patient doctor relationship. I'm here to save your life and I don't mind being your soldier and your captain. When you go to the army, the captain's telling you do sit 50 push ups. He's doing it to strengthen you to make you a warrior, right? So I don't mind being that captain to my patients, but at the same time, and it's not because I'm confident or what I Well, it is confidence, but it's not because I'm arrogant. It's because I'm confident. I know what works, you know, follow my protocol. I had one of my patients who's like a high influential patient. I actually had him on Dennis Prager and he didn't want to take the hydroxychloroquine for like, you know, a week. Like he was hesitating. And then on Wednesday night at 02:00 in the morning, he's calling me. He's like, I can't breathe. I'm tight. I'm going go to the hospital. I'm like, are you going to take the pill or not? And then within four hours he was breathing again. And he's like, Oh my God, I was so scared for a week to take this pill. And now I'm breathing again. Do you know how many patients said that to me? What killed me is like the people that were so anti because they made it political, right? And again, on purpose because the lobbyists are controlling both sides of the politics. What killed me was when the people that I treated would not tell anybody else that hydroxychloroquine work. And to me it's sort of like, look ultimately I treat you so you tell someone else and save another life, right? It's kind of like pass the baton. Like when you saw these protocols and you saw they work fine, you were telling other people. Speaker 2: Well, know, I'll tell you. You know, I'll tell you. You know, I had the opportunity to sit down at a barbecue with Peter McCullough. Brian Tyson is probably treating more people for COVID in in California than anyone. And we talked and Peter McCullough, they were impressed because I didn't know. I didn't wanna go. And I kinda just go, I'll just meet this guy and see what his deal is. Anyways, goes, Brian, what's working for you? What's about not working? I want to know what's happening in California. He wasn't saying, here's my protocol, push this, right? And so Brian Tyson was the same thing. So they both helped me out like, hey, want to help my patients. As an example, ivermectin, I've used it in the third world. Do a lot of volunteer work. We use it for these kids for parasites all the time and they get dramatically better. Their asthma gets better, their eczema gets better, their mood gets better. Everything gets better. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 2: And it's because they had an underlying parasite, right? So one of my patients comes back, she's having GI complaints after being overseas. We test her stool, she's positive. Treat her ivermectin as a treatment. Pharmacist refused to fill the medicine. And I had to argue with the pharmacist. She made me fax over the result of the stool study before she would have filled the medicine. What the heck is this? Is it their match? Indication are you giving it for? No one ever asked me that in twenty years of practice. So what happened is politics invaded us. We didn't invade politics, right? Because I'm trying to help my patients. I don't really care who the president is. I want to save that patient in front of And you and I have that same mindset. Doctor. Ursula, the same thing. When I saw him, go, this guy's nuts. He's going out full public and sitting on the steps of the Capitol. Is curse suicide if you're wrong. Speaker 1: Because we're not to us, it's not about politics. We don't care about the politics. Right? We don't care about the politicians. We care about saving lives. That's our job. Right? All have a job on the planet. Our job is simple. My job is the microbiome. It's all shit. Right? So ultimately I need to see clearly what's going on there. Speaker 2: It was interesting. And when I had that conversation with Peter McCullough, it turns out he doesn't like Trump. Right? And I go, why not? And he said, well, because he got the Cadillac, he got all this stuff we're talking about and he didn't make it everyone get that treatment protocol and say, this is the protocol everyone gets, not just the president of The United States. He got better quick. So you look at and go, okay. Speaker 1: And Cory doesn't like Trump either. He's a he's a full on Democrat. Speaker 2: Yeah. So you look at these guys and you go, okay, it's really about what works for the patient. The problem is we have so many, like you said, both sides are getting paid by the same people. So they're going to be biased in what they're doing. When I had to sit back and look at all these guys, the frontline doctors go, either they're all crazy. What do they have to gain by this? You know, look at look at McCullough gets his his ABIM. Speaker 1: Right. Removed. Speaker 2: Yanked. The the most decorated doctor with the most publications in integrity. Speaker 1: No longer a part of Baylor. You know, mean, that's Speaker 2: all that. Yeah, all that. And you start watching what happened to people. And I think what they did is they made people such an example. As you know, when you start your protocol, they come after you say, stop and stop doing this. Well, these people are getting better. I don't care what the FDA says. If they're getting better, if they're all getting sicker, then you say, yeah, we got to change the protocol. Right? But if they're getting better and you see these miracles, it's like, can any doctor in their right mind not say it's working what I'm doing? Speaker 1: And exactly that. Why are we not following what works? Why are we following a bunch of papers that are paid to push another narrative? Why are we not following what's working? Speaker 2: Because the only thing that makes sense is you can't have an emergency use intervention when there's an alternate treatment. Because if people say I could just do her protocol and get better, I got fired. A patient fired me because she got COVID. I said I would do McCullough's protocol. Here's what I recommend, which is your protocol too. Synthomac, zinc, blah, blah, blah. I got fired by the patient and go, okay, good luck. It's politics because it's politics for them, not what's going get me better. I don't care who came up with. I don't care if, you know, whoever I don't like came up with that. If it was the Fauci protocol and it was working, then I would use it. Right. Unfortunately, his protocol wasn't working. And now we're finding out like that they're all backpedaling and they can't remember what they said a year ago. It's amazing what we're up against. Speaker 1: No, it's and again, there is a force who is pushing the money who is paying. It's amazing. Here's what's amazing to me is how few people are not bribed to the right thing. You know what I mean? Think about it. You're standing up speaking, I'm standing up speaking. Nobody can pay me. You know, I've had bribes in the past from pharmaceutical companies and I'm like, no, this serious adverse event is going to be reported. I don't care if you're gonna blacklist me as a physician. And I've been blacklisted by a lot of pharmaceutical companies that I've reported because ultimately my job on the frontline of research is to make sure that a drug is safe enough to go out. And if it's not, it doesn't go out because ultimately, I have to sleep at night knowing that I did right for the patient. What is sad is how fast these drugs are going into market right now with such poor data. You know? Speaker 2: And that's the point Sabine. That's the concern is this. If you look at it and I just posted about that, I couldn't remember how many, like, think it's 15,000 drugs that have been approved by the FDA have been yanked off the market subsequently. But the money is made. It's just like you said, it's like when they publish these fraudulent studies, the money is made and the impression is made and then they retract it a few years later. Right? So in that time, how much money is riding on just getting this drug approved? And that's the problem is there's zero accountability for the patients that have died from Vioxx, from all these things. There's zero accountability for the FDA people. Or we'll go back to the opioid epidemic, right, with OxyContin, right? There's zero response. And they get promoted to pharma now and they're making 10 times what they were making for the FDA. So when you see this corruption, you go, what are we up against? And I think doctors like us who stand up and go, wait a minute, this is crazy. Like just using common sense, I have nothing to gain by someone using Zithromax or hydroxychloroquine. Have nothing to gain other than my patient being healthy. Right? So, like, I have no skin in the game that way. If the vax worked perfectly, I'd go, okay, worse, all my patients are. But when you start seeing problems, and I'll tell you that the corruption is so deep. I have a letter. You probably got the same letter by the ABIM saying, Hey, it's safe in 2020. They knew it was safe and effective with no long term consequences. How do you know that? How do you know that? If I just make a car, I can't tell you it's going to run for twenty years without running the car for twenty years and telling you, yeah, most of 90% of cars run for twenty years. So I think that's what we ran into is that you couldn't say, wait a minute, I'm seeing these bad things. These my friends are having health problems. I have nine nurses in my practice with DVTs out of nowhere. Right. And pulmonary embolism. Right. And no one reports this. And you go, well, if I give you doxycycline and two days later you have a stroke, you go, it's probably that new medicine that the doctor gave you. But right now there's such a blindness where people just won't see it. Like the doctors, none of those were reported to VAERS, not one, because the doctor said it's not a problem. It just was a coincidence. Like they never had a blood clot. And as a matter of fact, I have an 87 year old lady that had been taking care of her twenty years after her booster, four days later, she's in the hospital bilateral pulmonary embolism DVT and the doctors diagnosed her with a congenital clotting disorder. I'm like, okay, I talked to the doctor. She's 87 years old. No one in her family has ever had a clot. She's never had one with zero risk factors. She walks and plays bingo every day and she goes to, you know, the her literal exercise class and she has pulmonary embolism out of nowhere. And four days before that, she was vaccinated. It has nothing to do with it. And you know that. Speaker 4: I'm getting a lot of vascular events and and it's always a lot of stories are like are like this. 40 year old, then they go and check the carotid, check the coronaries. He's got no, he's, you know, he's he's got a history. He's not a not diabetic. And and and then, basically, they're told, we don't know why this happened. You know? We don't know why it happened. Because it's got clean carotids, clean coronaries, and and and they get they they're gaslighted. Had a guy come in. He was paralyzed and had the left side of his body, 43 years old, and I'm just like and I get it all the time. I literally have I have a huge, you know, amount of people running through my practice. We we saw 14,000 patients last year, and every one of them, ask them about the vaccine. And and it's kind of an interesting conversation now because pretty much seventy percent of people are like, I'm never taking that again. And then there's a twenty percent Speaker 1: That's why there's a sixteen percent people returning, right? But ultimately, I'm all for freedom of choice, right? I have a patient that's on his seventh booster. His life. He's got a lot of chronic diseases, super sick to begin with. So probably would have died from COVID and didn't have access. He wouldn't have had access to hydroxy or ivermectin or whatever. His choice, freedom of choice. I'm all for freedom of choice. When they mandated it and I saw the research was poor and I saw the animal studies were fast and they came to me to give it to me. That's when I opened my mouth to say, no, wait a minute. We're going to look at this because the moment you mandate something for all of humanity, you are essentially having the potential of extinguishing humanity. Here's the problem with, killing one race or two races. The problem is that that kills all of humanity. Humanity is like the microbiome. You kill a bunch of phyla and that's it. You have a diseased healthy, a diseased human, right? So we need to be very cautious. Was the biggest experiment in my opinion on the whole world. And the catastrophes that we are gonna see, mark my words, from now to the next twenty years are gonna be enormous. And thalidomide is gonna appear like nothing compared to what's Speaker 4: Well, I kinda I look at it like the problem we have is know, basically informed consent. The design flaws the design features for genetic disease, which are basically wide distribution and lengthy mRNA activity, are design flaws for this. So they're they're the major design flaws. Why distribution of brain bone marrow? When I did my work with lead ligand directed chemo, I wiped out the bone marrow on the animal models, you know, years ago, not not quite twenty years ago. And so we went away from the lipid nanoparticle model for targeting cancers. And I I knew right from the beginning we were gonna get that problem. And then, of course, you know, all the other things we've seen where what now we know that things stop breaking down. This is a horrible thing. And I think we you know, I just warn patients all the time. I said, you're basically creating an inflammatory pathway in your body that may last for who knows how long, and we don't even you know, you shouldn't do it. It's it's bad. It's bad medicine. Speaker 1: And Speaker 4: I also kinda go over the thing with patients all the time about respiratory viruses being short lived. They're basically, if you get a vaccine and you're over 50, you train your T cells and other immune system cells that are not going be renewed to chase a ghost that doesn't exist. And so, think in general, that's a concept that patients seem to understand really well. Speaker 5: So Anyway Yeah. Speaker 2: I think we all saw that. That was the thing. And Doctor. Ursula, want to personally thank you for stepping up early, early on and, like, making me look and say, okay, let's look at the data in Israel. Let's look what happens there. And then we saw the disaster that happened in Israel. Then you all speaking And for me as a doc in my practice, look, I want do what's best for my patients is take politics out of it. I'm right winger anyways, but take the politics out of it. Let me look and see what helps my patients. Right. I don't care who comes up with a protocol that And so the problem became, we started seeing adverse effects, but people would say, well, it just stays in your arm. It doesn't. Well, it doesn't clearly. And then we said we knew biodistribution. These guys had the data and they sat on it. And I think that's inhumane and fraudulent and evil. Right. They knew we all knew and we knew what we were seeing. So we started seeing bad outcomes. I mean, in the history of medicine, all of us being docs, I've never had anyone get the flu. And then three months later go, oh, now you need the flu shot for this year. It's a variant. You already have the flu. Don't worry about it. Right. You have natural immunity. And so when we brought up natural immunity, was called a right wing conspiracy theory. It's like that's the history of medicine we know about once you have something. Right. And if you're chasing that, like you're saying, you're chasing the ghost. It was two years ago, it's a variant. I'm going to train my body for someone who you know, my whole football team to tackle the guy who retired three years ago. It doesn't make any sense. So logically, from a medical perspective, it just never what what they were doing never made sense. And if we said anything, we were a quack. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 4: Yeah. You know, it's funny. The quack the quack part of it, I I usually kind of look and I go, I guess you guys don't know me very well. I graduated top of my class. I'm chief at MD Anderson. I invented an FDA approved drug. I go, you know, sorry to tell you, but I'm the upper dog. You know? So then my wife saw me doing that. She's like, you you need to stop. Don't stop that stuff Cause that you look like an arrogant asshole. Speaker 1: I usually say I'd rather be a quack then. You know what? Call me whatever you want to call me. I'm still going to be roaring at the end of the day. So, and this is a fight. This is a fight for humanity. You know, someone said to me yesterday, you're such a fighter. And I said, you better believe I was born for this. So, you know, that's why I have the lioness hair. So I'm ready to fight. This is our freedom we're talking about. This is our freedom of choice. There is a corruption in medicine. There is an interference with science and research that is going to affect all of us. Speaker 4: So are you saying Francis Collins and Fauci don't know what they're talking about? I don't understand. You know better than them. Speaker 1: I think that they have their own hypothesis and let's just say, you know, everybody has their own hypothesis on what a virus does but at the end of the day don't interfere with my hypothesis and I won't interfere with yours. How's that? Don't interfere with my body and I won't tell you what to put in your body. How's that? Because if I had my choices I would say everybody needs a fecal transplant right now. So I'm ready. We'll wrap Speaker 2: it I Speaker 1: had to bring fecal transplant in this somehow because that's the future. Speaker 2: Amen. Speaker 1: It was great talking. Brian, thank you so much. Speaker 2: Thanks, Abin. Appreciate it. Speaker 1: Thank you for stepping in in between the OR cases. You're awesome. Thanks. Thanks. Alright. Bye. Speaker 4: See you guys. Thanks. Speaker 0: It's not just a book. It's also a leading podcast available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, on your Alexa. Let's talk with doctor Sabine Hazen. Tune in now on all major platforms.
HoodedClaw1974
Posted - September 11, 2025 at 7:27 AM
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 4:13 PM

@HoodedClaw1974 - Patriotic 🇬🇧 Nation 🟣

American patriot with stark warning for those who seek to wage war on us. 👇👇 https://t.co/WTtyiGlRgk

Video Transcript AI Summary
I hope when this is all over, you remember who fired first. You've tried to kill the president twice, and now you've assassinated man for talking. You don't really wanna do this. K? 400,000,000 plus firearms in this country, and they don't belong to the left, bro. Yeah. If you think it's okay to murder someone because of their opinion, you get what's coming to you. You and yours.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hope when this is all over, you remember who fired first. You've tried to kill the president twice, and now you've assassinated man for talking. You don't really wanna do this. K? 400,000,000 plus firearms in this country, and they don't belong to the left, bro. Yeah. If you think it's okay to murder someone because of their opinion, you get what's coming to you. You and yours.

@HoodedClaw1974 - Patriotic 🇬🇧 Nation 🟣

They will push people to far.

EAGLE1DALLAS
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 12:48 AM

@EAGLE1DALLAS - 🅴🅰🅶🅻🅴1 🇺🇸🦅

@HustleBitch_ Candace: Very Important: Bibi assassinated Charlie. Here’s your proof.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

This is WARFARE! it’s not just bombs and bullets, its information, technology, and other unseeable forces. It’s 5th Generation Warfare! @boonecutler @charliekirk11 LOCAL ACTION NATIONAL IMPACT It’s time to stand up, step up, and speak up. LET’S GO!!! https://t.co/SmnH4SiLGG

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in a war most people don't even see. But it's not just bombs or bullets. It's information, technology, and control over what you believe. Every day, powerful forces shape the news you read and the thoughts you hold. This is fifth generation warfare. And whether you know it or not, you are already on the battlefield. The choice is yours. Remain unaware or recognize the fight and take a stand.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are in a war most people don't even see. But it's not just bombs or bullets. It's information, technology, and control over what you believe. Every day, powerful forces shape the news you read and the thoughts you hold. This is fifth generation warfare. And whether you know it or not, you are already on the battlefield. The choice is yours. Remain unaware or recognize the fight and take a stand.
GenXGirl1994
Posted - January 23, 2026 at 3:49 PM
Saved - January 24, 2026 at 12:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Discussion alleges a dark history of Christian Zionism, naming Darby, Scofield, Untermeyer, and Frowde as key figures linked to Zionism, publishing, and influence on U.S. policy and churches. A reply clarifies the term’s 19th-century origin and 1930s popularization to counter anti-Semitism. The original poster counters, calling it the most successful propaganda campaign of modern times.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

THE DARK HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN ZIONISM - John Nelson Darby: Heretic, created Exclusive Brethren, Zionist (00:54) - Cyrus Scofield: Criminal, fraudster, converted to Christianity after escaping arrest warrants, author of the Scofield Bible (04:49) - Samual Untermeyer: Sponsor of Scofield’s Bible, Jewish lawyer to Rothchild, convinced Woodrow Wilson to enter WWI, wrote bill that created Federal Reserve (09:49) - Henry Frowde: Oxford Press publisher, zealot Zionist, Exclusive Brethren, published Scofield Bible, sent millions of free copies to American churches, Bible salesmen etc infiltrating whole denominations (12:21)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion argues that the true Christian faith centered on Jesus Christ has been replaced by a fake faith centered on Israel’s land, a deception said to have progressed through religious media over decades. The speakers trace the origin of the rapture doctrine and the idolizing of the state of Israel to the Plymouth Brethren in Great Britain, led by John Nelson Darby, who was described as a disgruntled Anglican cleric pushed out of the Anglican Communion. The Exclusive Brethren, a super-radical subgroup within the movement, were said to have produced dispensationalism—the idea that God deals with humanity in distinct dispensations. This view, they claim, held that Christ would reign for a thousand years after his return (pre-millennial), would come before the tribulation (pre-tribulation), and would establish a Jewish kingdom in Israel seven years later. The speakers coin the term “Dipsyism” (D for dispensationalism, P for pre-millennial/pre-tribulation, Z for Zionism) to describe this framework, arguing it exists to promote Zionism and the establishment of Israel. Charles Spurgeon, a Reformed Baptist pastor in Britain, is described as a critic of the Plymouth Brethren, warning Christians in London to stay away from them as heretical. The conversation asserts that the Brethren’s doctrines later spread through American Protestant churches and became widely accepted, influencing denominations such as Baptists, Pentecostals, Assemblies of God, and others. The role of Cyrus Scofield is central to the narrative. The speakers recount that Scofield, described as not a doctor despite the title “Doctor Scofield,” was a Confederate Army participant who allegedly embellished his Civil War record. They allege he deserted the army, received safe passage to St. Louis, helped a Jewish lawyer named John Ingalls become a U.S. Senator from Kansas, and was appointed U.S. District Attorney for Kansas at age 29, a position he allegedly held under a cloud of scandal including bribery, land transfers, and forged bank-note withdrawals. After abandoning his wife and children in Kansas, Scofield later became a pastor in Dallas, Texas, marrying a woman from his church while concealing his previous marriage. In the early 1900s, Scofield is said to have joined the Lotus Club of New York City, sponsored by Samuel Untermyer, a Jewish lawyer described as an agent for the Rothschilds who supported Zionist liberation and helped influence Woodrow Wilson to enter World War I. Untermyer is also claimed to have written the Senate bill that established the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system and to have become the first lawyer for the IRS. The narrative claims Untermyer arranged Scofield’s trip to London, where he met Oxford Publishing executives and returned with a contract to publish John Nelson Darby’s Zionist Notes in a Christian Bible—the Schofield Bible—thereby introducing Zionist propaganda into American churches through Darby’s notes. The conversation asserts that Oxford distributed Schofield Bibles widely for free, which led to their adoption in rural American churches and among denominations, shaping the doctrine in North America. It cites Moody Bible Institute, Dallas Theological Seminary, and others as heirs to Scofield’s influence. Finally, the speakers challenge Dallas Theological Seminary, Moody Bible Institute, and rapture advocates to name where Cyrus Scofield earned a Doctor of Divinity degree, insisting no such institution exists and accusing Scofield of being avowedly dishonest. They name Arlo Graebelin as a rabid Zionist Christian pastor allegedly connected to Scofield’s editing and assert that Scofield was not a real medical doctor or theologian, accusing the present institutions of perpetuating the lie.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sadly, millions of Americans don't even realize that the true Christian faith centered on Jesus Christ has been swapped out for a fake faith centered on Israel's land. Now, didn't happen overnight. The deception has been underway for decades. The growth of religious television, radio, and publishing, however, greatly advanced the propaganda. How did we get to this place in 2018 where millions of people who go to church don't know the core tenets of the Christian faith? Who hoodwinked them into believing another gospel? Doc Burkhardt and I are going to discuss the origin of the rapture doctrine and the blasphemous idolizing of the state of Israel as a god. You have to go back to the eighteen thirties. Speaker 1: Yes. John Nelson Darby, yes. Speaker 0: In Great Britain there was a sect called the Plymouth Brethren, and they were a very radical sect. John Nelson Darby was a, I guess you would describe him as a disgruntled Anglican cleric. Speaker 1: He actually was pushed out of the Anglican Speaker 0: Yeah, pushed out of the Anglican Communion. He became the leader of the Plymouth Brethren, and they believed, and this is why it's so dangerous, the Plymouth Brethren, and they're still around today, but not much of an organization of a denomination, but their doctrine took over the Protestant churches of America. But they believed that God gave them revelation knowledge about the last days that the Lord had not given any other people in, at that time, eighteen hundred years of inside the Plymouth Brethren, there was a super radical sect, alright, called the Exclusive Brethren. Okay. Alright? And so they were even more privileged than the regular Brethren. Speaker 1: At first I've heard of that. Speaker 0: Yeah. John Nelson Darby was the founder of the Exclusive Brethren. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Alright? He had even more knowledge than the rest of them. And so they came up with this, over time, came up with this doctrine of dispensationalism, that God was dealing with humanity in dispensations. Nobody had ever taught this nonsense. Right. They dreamed this stuff up, and they began to teach it. And do you know who their biggest critic was in Great Britain at No. That Who? It was a pastor named Charles Spurgeon. Speaker 1: Oh, just somewhere in the middle pastor. Speaker 0: Yeah, yeah, the Reformed Baptist pastor. Now, how would you like to get called down from the pulpit of Charles Spurgeon? But Charles Spurgeon was denouncing the Plymouth Brethren as a dangerous, radical sect, and he was warning the Christians of London, stay away from them. They're teaching heresies. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And now their heresies are the accepted teaching of the Protestant churches in America. The brethren, under John Nelson Darby, they concocted what I I've coined the name Dipsyism. D P P Z. Dipsyism. The D is for dispensationalism, and then pre millennial. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Meaning, Christ is going to reign for a thousand years after he returns to earth. Right. And then, pre tribulation. Speaker 1: He comes back before the tribulation period begins. Speaker 0: Yes. Secretly the Gentile church. Right. And then he comes seven years later again to establish this Jewish kingdom in Israel. So, you've got D for dipsyism, D for dispensational, pre millennial, pre tribulation, and the Z is Zionism. Because it's all built around Zionism. There is no purpose for this doctrine without the propaganda for a Zionist state. It was created for the establishment of Israel. This is the only reason for this doctrine. This way back in the eighteen hundred's. Speaker 1: So you had two tracts kind of building. You had something building in the church at that time through the Plymouth Brethren and this new dispensational idea that was coming about. But within Jewry around the world, within the Jewish faith, there was a different path building up. And that was a goal of a restoration of the State Of Israel at some point. These two were on the same track. Speaker 0: The two came together. And that's what we're going to talk about here today. So when did it come together? It came together, in the early nineteen hundreds because Don Nelson Darby's crazy doctrines went nowhere. They stayed in Great Britain among the Plymouth Brethren all through the eighteen hundreds. And there were only pockets of people in The United States who even knew about it, that that gave it any kind of respect. But then there was Cyrus Schofield. And Schofield became the propaganda meister for John Nelson Darby's doctrine. But before we get into the doctrine, I want to talk about who Cyrus Scofield was because this is going to blow away people. If you have a Scofield reference bible, you need to know the author of that Reference Bible because he's not the person you think he is. He's not Doctor. Scofield. Never was a doctor. He never was a doctor. Alright? Never ever. I'm gonna go down a list of some things about Cyrus Scofield. Okay? So, first, he embellished his Civil War record. He was in the Confederate Army, the seventh Tennessee Infantry. He totally embellished his his record. And if you if you just go on the Internet, you can find a very detailed investigation by a Tennessee professor who did a lot of research into Scofield's true military record. Speaker 1: And that was a contemporary of his age too. Yes. That that wrote that up. Speaker 0: So Who wrote exactly what Scofield did, but then compared it to what he said about his record. He embellished it. He he he made up stuff. He he made people believe he was a hero. He was a hero in Antietam. I mean, all kinds of stuff. And and Scofield just made things up. But this was this was typical of his life. After deserting the Confederate army, he was given safe passage to St. Louis, Missouri. Right. And, in 1873, he helped a Jewish lawyer named John Ingalls become The U. S. Senator from the state of Kansas. And, well I should say Senator Ingalls appointed Schofield as The U. S. District Attorney for Kansas. Right. Okay. Schofield was 29 years old. Speaker 1: Nice position for 29. Speaker 0: He had never went to law school. Right. Okay. Became U. S. District attorney for the state of, or you know, for Kansas at age 29. He didn't last one year in that office. He was forced to resign. Listen to me folks, Cyrus Schofield was forced to resign as U. S. District Attorney of Kansas under a cloud of scandal, including bribery. Speaker 1: Yes, and land transfers and he had some very questionable Speaker 0: He bezzled money out of people. There were warrants for his arrest. Some people believe he served some time in jail for forgery. He was forging names to bank notes, to get loans. The guy was involved in all kinds of shady deals, okay? This is Cyrus Schofield. So where does he go from there? He escaped, but he was always like two steps ahead of the law. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: The law was looking for him, but he managed to stay ahead of the sheriff. Well, he ended up, well at that time he was married. He was married to a woman, he had two children, and then he abandoned his wife and children. And he ends up in Dallas, Texas and becomes the pastor of the First Congregational Church of Dallas. Now, he marries a woman from the church, but he doesn't tell the church that he abandoned his wife and back in Kansas. Now, never gave them a dime in support, totally abandoned them. And yet he's a pastor of a church in Dallas, okay? And he doesn't tell the congregation. You know, he didn't put that on his resume. He didn't tell the, you know, the pastoral selection committee, oh by the way, I've got another wife and kids back there in Kansas and I've this new wife here and he just kept it quiet, okay? So '18, let's see what was it, 1883 his wife filed for divorce, okay? And filed on charges of abandonment. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: All right? So this is the record of Cyrus Schofield. Well then, you know, let's fast forward early nineteen hundreds. Now he's a pastor of a small church, I think in Boston, Massachusetts, okay? He's making like a thousand dollars a year salary. Still going nowhere, I mean, in terms of finances and things like that. Alright. He's just he's just a small church pastor. Right. He gets invited to become a member of the Lotus Club of New York City. Speaker 1: Now what's the Lotus Club? Speaker 0: Well, the Lotus Club is one of the most prestigious gentlemen's club of New York City. We're talking about people's sponsors like Andrew Carnegie. Right. Okay. The elite of the elite were members of the Lotus Club and it's still around today. Where did he get the money? Where did he get the money to pay the membership dues? The membership dues were more than his salary. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Alright? Why would he be invited? This nobody pastor, why would he be invited to come to New York City and join the Lotus Club? Well, who sponsored him? The man who sponsored Cyrus Schofield was a Jewish lawyer named Samuel Untermeyer. Now, Samuel Untermeyer was an agent for the Rothschild banking dynasty. Speaker 1: Alright, so he's the one that's financing this up to this point. Speaker 0: Well, he's inviting Cyrus Schofield to join the Lotus Club. Why? Would a lawyer, Samuel Untermyer, an agent for the Rothschilds, what interest would he have in Cyrus Schofield, an unknown, undistinguished pastor of a small church in Massachusetts who's got a police record and a shady past for being a swindler. Why would this Jewish lawyer want anything to do with Cyrus Schofield? Let's learn a little bit more about who Mr. Untenmeyer was. He was a zealous advocate for the Zionist liberation movement that was in full swing at that time. Speaker 1: So they were in the process of trying to come up with ways to reestablish the nation of Israel. Speaker 0: That's Speaker 1: right. Not on a religious basis. No. No. This is strictly this is a goal that we have to Speaker 0: To get the land back. Right. Okay. Mister Untermyer played a big role in the election of Woodrow Wilson. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: And a very influential role in convincing President Wilson to take The USA into World War I. Speaker 1: Now was Mr. Untermyer a really good Christian guy? Speaker 0: No. He was a Zionist Jewish lawyer. Speaker 1: So why is a Zionist Jewish lawyer interested in some small town preacher in Boston? Isn't that Speaker 0: the million dollar question here? There's one other piece of information you need to know about Mr. Untermar. He is remember I told you, he was an agent for the Rothschilds. He wrote the Senate law. He wrote the Senate bill that became law that established the U. S. Federal Reserve banking systems. Speaker 1: So this is the guy that we have to blame for the Federal Reserve Yes. Speaker 0: He also became the, I guess, the first lawyer for the IRS. Speaker 1: Already I'm not like anyone, so. Okay. Speaker 0: So, you've got a Zionist leader, a Rothschild agent And definitely a New World Order person with his, yes. Who led The U. S. In World War I, who was manipulating Woodrow Wilson, who wrote the Senate bill for the Federal Reserve Act, and now he becomes friends with Cyrus Schofield and says, I want you to join the Lotus Club. But what happens then? Well, Cyrus Schofield suddenly gets sponsored to go to London and he has a meeting with the head people, the top executives of Oxford Publishing. Speaker 1: Right. And that was the premier publishing company in the world at that time. Speaker 0: You better believe it. And you just couldn't get a meeting in London with Oxford Publishing. Speaker 1: But he could. Speaker 0: Yeah. He got him there and he got him over to London to meet with the Oxford Publishing executives. And so, Schofield comes back with a contract, a publishing contract, to publish John Nelson Darby's Zionist Notes in a Christian Bible. Speaker 1: God, did this work? Speaker 0: It's called propaganda. Folks, the Zionist Jews infiltrated the Christian church in the early nineteen hundreds through Cyrus Schofield. He was their little puppet. They introduced Zionist propaganda into the churches by publishing Darby's notes in a Bible, so they defiled the holy Bible, they defiled it. They corrupted the bible by publishing notes that were promoting Zionism. And so then somebody financed the publication of a vast number of Schofield Bibles and suddenly these things were being mailed out to churches all over America. Speaker 1: I remember stories that my great aunt used to tell me of a Bible salesman back in the 20s and 30s. And so I did a little research on that. Do you know the Bibles that they were selling? They were selling Schofield Bibles. And so these Bibles were getting distributed all over rural America, small town churches. Speaker 0: Millions. All Speaker 1: over. And the Bible salesman would get the Bibles for free. Then they would sell them for whatever amount they could get out of it. Speaker 0: Well, would they get them for free? Speaker 1: The company that was publishing them obviously wanted to get their Bibles out there. Well, was Oxford. That's Speaker 0: right. So Oxford gave away the Bibles. Right. Why? Out of the goodness of their heart. Right. Right? No. They were they were infiltrating the American evangelical churches with Zionist propaganda. And slowly, alright, the Baptists bought into it, the Pentecostals bought into it, the Assemblies of God, the Church of God. You just go down the list of Pentecostal and Baptist denominations that got suckered into this thing. Speaker 1: Yeah, and people actually believe the notes are as sacred as the texts that are there. And I can speak to personal experience from that. When I was at Bible College, I had friends that believed the text. Speaker 0: That's right. Speaker 1: The notes. They said, This is inspired. Said, Are you crazy? How can the notes be inspired? But there were people that felt like the notes themselves were inspired. Speaker 0: That's right. And so now it's become, the doctrine has become accepted in thousands of churches in America. You watch Christian television, it's the only thing to hear, the rapture, the rapture, the rapture, Israel, Israel, Israel. And if you say anything else, you're the heretic. Right. Speaker 1: And even if you don't use a Scofield Bible or reference Bible, it has so influenced the leadership of so many denominations, you know, like Moody Bible Institute, Dallas Theological Seminary, all these different places. That's the template that has been laid on the doctrine in North America. Speaker 0: Well, Cyrus Schofield was friends with Dwight Moody. Now, split. Apparently Dwight Moody figured out that Cyrus Scofield was shady, but Moody kept the doctrine. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Okay? The Scofield people are the ones who started the Dallas Theological Seminary. Absolutely. And actually, Mr. Scofield, I don't think, was the editor of his Bible. There's question about that. Arlo Graebelin. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Who was a a rabid Zionist Christian pastor, but man he was he was totally sold out to getting Israel to get their land back in place. Alright. That's that's that was his entire mission. Okay. He speak he spoke Yiddish better than most Jews. And so a lot of people think that he actually was the editor of the Schofield Right. Now, one thing we mentioned at the beginning, Doctor. Schofield, alright, he's known today as Doctor. Schofield, Doctor. Cyrus Schofield. And I would like, right now, I want to put out a challenge to Dallas Theological Seminary, Moody Bible Institute, and all the other rapture people out there. Please send to me the name of the educational institution where Doctor. Cyrus Schofield attended and graduated and was given a Doctor of Divinity degree. Please send me that institution's name because it doesn't exist And you all know it. You know he is a liar and a scoundrel and you've kept up the lie because you don't want the public to know the truth about Cyrus Scofield. But he was not a doctor of anything, a doctor of buffoonery.

@GovMikeHuckabee - Ambassador Mike Huckabee

In response to the statement of non-evangelical churches in Israel, I issued the following. I hope you will read prayerfully. I love my brothers and sisters in Christ from traditional, liturgical churches and respect their views, but I do not feel any sect of the Christian faith should claim exclusivity in speaking for Christians worldwide or assume there is only one viewpoint regarding faith in the Holy Land.  Personally I’m part of a global and growing evangelical tradition that believes the authority of Scripture and the faithfulness of God in keeping His covenants.  That includes His covenant with Abraham and the Jewish people.  My Christian faith is built on the foundation of Judaism and without it, Christianity would not exist.  Without the Judeo-Christian worldview, there would be no Western Civilization, and without Western Civilization, there would be no America.  The thought that God is even capable of breaking a covenant is anathema to those of us who embrace Holy Scripture as the authority of the church.  If God can or would break His covenant with the Jews, then what hope would Christians have that He would keep His covenant with us? Labels such as “Christian Zionism” are too often used in a pejorative manner to disparage free-church believers, of which there are millions across the planet.  Christians are followers of Christ and a Zionist simply accepts that the Jewish people have a right to live in their ancient, indigenous, and Biblical homeland.  It’s hard for me to understand why every one who takes on the moniker “Christian” would not also be a Zionist.  It’s not a commitment to a particular government or government policy, but to the Biblical revelation as given to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.  In my faith, there is certainly room for those who “butter their bread” differently than me, and I would hope that there would be room in the hearts of other church bodies for me.  We need to unite in those truths that should be agreed upon, such as the sanctity of life, the sacred act of marriage, the autonomy of the individual, the desire to lift up every human and alleviate human suffering, and the belief that grace is God’s gift to us all. Please share with others and "Pray for the peace of Jerusalem!"

@hippyresident - 𝕻𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖌𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗

@GenXGirl1994 The term didn’t appear until the 19th century to describe Jewish converts to Christianity, and was popularized in the 1930s by American liberals and interfaith groups to combat “anti-Semitism”

@hippyresident - 𝕻𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖘𝖙𝖎𝖌𝖆𝖙𝖔𝖗

Judeo-Christianity is a MYTH "Christianity is built on the belief that Jesus (Yeshua) is the Messiah, the Son of God, and savior of mankind. Judaism explicitly rejects Jesus as Messiah, views Him as a false prophet, and in rabbinical texts, vilifies Him harshly. One cannot accept both unless you strip them of their core doctrines."

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

Our Founding Fathers built this Republic on Judeo-Christian principles, knowing that only a moral and godly people could keep it. As Americans, we should be fearless about our values. That said, our foundation is under direct attack by a godless enemy. This battle is not only

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that our country was founded upon Judeo-Christian principles and values to make it a godly nation, and that we must reconnect with the spirituality of why it was created. The struggle we face is described as a battle between good and evil, with the infiltration into the country labeled the single greatest threat. This threat is intellectual, emotional, physical, and spiritual. The speaker emphasizes that the United States is a republic with a representative form of government, where “we, the people” determine how we will live. They note that the last ten presidential elections averaged 67% turnout, meaning more than 30% of registered voters did not vote. The call is to organize and cultivate a passion for the country, especially given the challenges ahead, which are described as formidable and tied to the adversaries who are “smart and evil.” A central message is that survival for the next two hundred fifty years depends on states standing up and embracing local action. The speaker urges people to take their concerns to their counties, towns, and churches, to speak up and to sound off. Each listener is urged to consider how they can serve today, because one person cannot control national events or Washington, D.C. but can influence life in their own community. To act, the speaker proposes practical ways to contribute: making phone calls, sending emails, writing letters, and going door to door. The overarching theme is service to the country here and now. The repeated exhortation is to carry this message home and to ask others the defining question: “How am I serving today?” and “How are you serving today?” The speaker acknowledges the inevitability of national leadership and personalities (e.g., Donald Trump) but asserts that individual citizens can shape their immediate surroundings by engaging in local efforts. The appeal is to dedicate time and energy to constitutional goals at the local level, to work toward objectives such as constitutional carry, and to determine how each person can contribute to their state and community. In closing, the speaker expresses a personal longing and emotional urgency, pleading with audiences to take the message back to their communities and to persist in asking others how they are serving today, in order to mobilize collective action and national resilience through local involvement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our country was founded upon a set of Judeo Christian principles and values to make sure that we were a godly country because that's the fulfillment of who we are as a nation. How do we bring the spirituality of what our country is and was and why it was created. Because the the enemy, the adversaries that we face, it's evil. It is evil. It is godless. The infiltration into our country is the single greatest threat that we face. It's intellectual, it's emotional, it is physical, but it is definitely spiritual. It's good versus evil. Our country is in the place that it is in because the American people have not stood up enough. I'm talking about citizens in their communities. We, the people, we live not in a democracy. We live in a republic. We live in a representative form of government. That means that we, the people, are the ones that are supposed to say how it is that we are going to live. The last 10 elections for president of The United States Of America, we averaged 67% turnout for for voting for president of The United States. So that's more than 30% of the American people that were registered to vote could vote and decided not to vote. We must organize. We must get together. We must have a have a passion for our country. We have massive, massive challenges ahead, folks, because they're smart. They're smart and they're evil. It's not gonna take one presidency. The only way that this country is going to survive another two hundred fifty years is if states stand up and come together. This idea of local action is powerful. It is powerful. And so when we go out, when you leave here, and you go to your counties, you go back to your towns, and you're in your, you know, your various groups, and your churches especially, You've got to speak up. You have to sound off. People come up to me all the time and they tell me, thank you for your service. And I say, well, how are you serving today? How are you today? So if you don't remember anything I say, I want you to remember that question. And when you're going out there and you're talking and you're in your different places in life, I want you to ask that same question of the people that you're with. How are you serving our country today? Today. Because if you don't decide to serve as a citizen of this country, if you don't stand up today, tomorrow, the next day, as we go through these next couple of years, because one man cannot do it. You cannot control what Donald Trump is gonna do today. You cannot control what is happening in Washington DC, but you can take control of what is happening in your life today. You can take control of what you're doing right here, right now, in your county, in your town, whether you're gonna decide to serve, whether you're gonna decide to stand up for your country. You guys and gals are here to achieve something. You're here to achieve something for this state. Right? Whatever those things are, constitutional carry, whatever. Whatever it is. You have got to decide how can I help? You know, can I can I use my time to get on the phone to make some calls? Do you need some emails done? Do you need some writing done of letters? You know, do you need somebody to go around and knock on doors? I'm not asking you folks. I'm getting chills talking about it. I'm getting emotional about it. I am pleading. I am going around this country pleading with people. Take this message back. Ask the question. How am I serving today? How are you serving today? And drive it home.

@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl

@hippyresident It’s the most successful propaganda campaign of modern times.

Sparky131790
Posted - February 6, 2026 at 2:33 AM
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 2:31 AM

@Sparky131790 - Matt

Who’s ready to stand up and use their power of one of the People of our Constitutional republic? https://t.co/PyKfLdm3iV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that “we own everything”—our jails, our courts, and our public servants who operate in our buildings and seats, paid with our money. No new structures are needed; instead, a core group in each state should be well versed in state and federal constitutions to exercise inherent rights and hold public servants accountable. The speaker references the grand jury concept and claims state constitutions authorize citizens to hold officials accountable, alter or reform government, abolish it, restore republics, and institute new governments that benefit the people, who are entitled to protect their rights and happiness. The call is for “We The People” to act against treasonous public servants, with the expectation that once some people take a stand, others will follow. The speaker contends that many public servants don’t understand their true job or the constitutional framework, and that overthrowing corruption will cause others to “fall in line.” They acknowledge many people want to do what’s right but fear standing up or being labeled; thus, proactive citizens must act to restore the republic. Citing the Epstein files as a wake-up point, the speaker argues that politics is a rigged, two-party system where Republicans and Democrats are one party, each pandering to different sides, and that voting is an illusion of choice and freedom. They criticize the notion that people vote for bills they don’t understand because they lack constitutional knowledge, trust in people in suits and degrees, and do not recognize the system’s designed nature. The talk expands to a broad indictment of the system, from clerks to top officials with guns and badges, claiming most are in it for power or the illusion of power, though some entered to do good but have also been brainwashed into accepting the system as reality. The speaker argues for a systematic shift from passive participation to action by “We the People,” citing psychological and medical warfare as historical design. They stress that voting has long been rigged and that public attention is diverted by entertainment, such as sports and the NFL, which they describe as rigged for show. The speaker asks listeners to imagine all the people in one stadium uniting to use the law to hold public servants accountable, indicating that many would rather be slaves than join the effort, but others will stand up. Plans include starting to assemble a grand jury and building a network to act quickly to “fix things,” with urgency to remove nonperforming officials from their positions. They exhort readers to remember these are our jails, our buildings, our public servants, and to begin throwing them out if they refuse to do their jobs. The speaker invokes the founders’ spirit, alleging widespread redaction of Epstein-related information and accusing those involved of complicity. The guidance is to stop merely talking, exercise constitutionally protected rights, and rely on “We the People” to restore the republic, arguing that true governance comes from the people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, actually, we own everything. Right? These are our jails. These are our courts. Just like these are our public servants. They're all sitting in our buildings, in our seats, getting paid with our money. We don't need to build anything new. What we need is a good core group of people coming together in each state, well versed in the state and federal constitutions, in exercise exercising our inherent rights to hold our public servants accountable. Right? This is, going back to the grand jury stuff. Right? And this is why I showed the state go I can show you several different state constitution provisions that tell you that our job is to hold our public servants accountable and to alter reform and abolish government and restore our republics and institute new governments that benefit us. Right? Because that's what all government is for, protecting our our our rights and securing our happiness. This is what people don't understand. We have to do this. It's gonna take We The People coming together and start holding treasonous, traitor, public servants accountable. K? And once this starts going, right, once we start doing this, others are gonna fall in line. Now there's a lot of these public servants, as I said, right, they don't understand what their real job is. They don't understand any of this. But once they start seeing these things happen, I can guarantee you, they will fall in line. They're gonna wanna do what's right because a lot of people, right, a lot of people morally want to do what's right. They just don't know what to do, how to do it, and they're too afraid to stand up because they don't wanna be singled out. They're afraid of being, you know, labeled crazy or whatever by family, friends, the government, whatever the case may be. They're too afraid. So it's gonna take those of us who are willing to stand up and do what is necessary to restore our republics and end this corruption. I mean, look at what's going on with the Epstein files. Right? If that's not waking people up, I'm it doesn't matter if you're right wing, left wing, both sides, Republicans and Democrats, they're all one part. It's one party. K? One panders to one side, one panders to the other. And they sit there and blah blah blah, right, to to get you to go vote for them. It's like I was saying in the other video, the majority of the people, they're voting for people and voting on bills and nonsense that they don't even know what the hell they're voting for because they don't understand the constitutions. They don't understand their rights. They believe these people in suits and ties and degrees. They all they that they actually know what they're doing. They know what they're talking about and that they have our best interest in mind. And that's where the problem lies. The whole thing is corrupt. K? And, unfortunately, it doesn't matter if it's the lowest clerks in the townships or cities, all the way to the public servants with guns and badges, all the way to the top. Right? The majority of them are only in there for the power and the illusion of having power. Right? And then you have the ones that they they got into these positions to actually do good. But they but just like the majority, right, they've been brainwashed, they believe this system that they're in is how things really are. This is why we have everything. Right? This is all done by design. Psychological, medical warfare for generations, and here we are. This is why it's going to take we, the people. We can't continue to sit back and and just wait. Right? We can't continue waiting on all this for we just gotta vote this person in. Voting does nothing. If you guys haven't realized, k, it's been rigged for a very, very long time, and they give you the voting. It's just the illusion that you have a choice and freedom. And I think that's beyond obvious at this point. I mean but then again, we still have people that worship sports and football. Right? When even fucking football, basketball, it's all rigged. Right? But yeah. And and even in the NFL. Right? That blows my mind. The NFL's clearly rigged, and it's just all for show and entertainment. Right? Bread and circuses. Right? That's what it is. But you still have these people that they worship that shit. Right? So I said in one my other videos, can you imagine if we got all the people that packed themselves in just one stadium come together using the law to hold our public servants accountable? We could man, you start flipping states left and right. But people are they wanna live like slave they would rather continue to be slaves and rely on other people to do the work. Well, that's fine because I know there's more people like me and a lot of the other people that follow me. Right? We're gonna do what needs to be done, but we have to start coming together. And that's why I'm I'm gonna start working on putting a grand jury together. That's why I'm I put my my grand jury video. Okay. Reach out to me. Let's let's let's start doing this and building this because the faster we do it, the faster we fix things. And that's gonna be the key. Now we have to remember, like I said in the beginning of this, right, these are our jails. These are our buildings. These are our public servants. They don't wanna do their jobs. K? So we'll start throwing them on their ass. Right? What would our founders be doing? Right? Let's really think about it. There would be tree ornaments galore at this point. Look at look at all the people that are redacting all this information in the Epstein files. They're complicit. They're aiding and they're aiding and hiding these crimes and the people that are guilty of all these disgusting things that have been taking place. Place. K? We know what we have to do. We gotta start doing it. Let's do it. Let's restore our republic. Let's stop being talk. Right? Let's stop. We can sit on here and bitch and complain all day long, and we see all these people posting videos of being violated by public servants and violated left and right in the courts, let's stop playing this game. Let's do our job. Right? We have every right. It is our constitutionally protected inherent rights. Right? Everything that we have comes from our creator. Go read all of the state preambles. Right? It tells you we give things to our creator for our for our freedoms and our rights. K? We have dominion over our lives and lands. We have these powers. You wanna fix our government? You wanna fix our country? It's gonna take We the People.
View Full Interactive Feed