reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @me150000

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 8:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UN and WEF aim to eliminate farming, pushing for insect-based diets. A documentary called "No Farmers No Food" sheds light on this. Check out the full documentary at theepochtimes.com. For similar content, visit wideawakemedia.com. ClimateScam NetZero UnitedNations WorldEconomicForum.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Unelected globalists at the UN and WEF are utterly determined to abolish farming, using any pretext they can dream up, so people will have no choice but to eat an insect-based diet—as detailed in an excellent new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?' Watch the full documentary: https://theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #UnitedNations #WorldEconomicForum

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is concern about an attack on farmers worldwide, raising the question of what people will eat if farmers are eliminated. Some speculate that certain governments may want to change the current food production system and promote alternative sources of protein like insects and birds. The European Commission has recently declared mealworms as food, potentially benefiting insect farmers. However, critics argue that there is a globalist agenda to push for diets without meat and promote bug consumption through media propaganda. Despite limited demand for insects currently, large insect protein processing facilities are being built. As food shortages and high prices become more prevalent, people may be forced to consider alternative protein sources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no doubt that there's a real attack on farmers happening on every corner of this planet, which logically poses one very obvious question. If you get rid of the farmers, you still need to eat something, especially with protein. Right? Speaker 1: Maybe they don't want, the food production like it is, right now. I mean, we we produce potatoes and we produce milk and we produce meat and, Maybe there's a government who doesn't want us to eat anymore that kind of food. Speaker 0: That instead turned to what? Speaker 1: Oh, insects, birds, I don't know. Speaker 2: Today, the European Commission has officially declared mealworms to be food. It could be a game changer for insect farmers. They're now hoping to grow their businesses and turn insects into another source of protein for Europeans Even if just a niche one. Speaker 3: There's this top down globalist idea that Certain Western countries have diets that they do not approve of. In other words, they're more meat based and They feel like humans don't need meat based protein and they want to either force people To follow their paradigms that they wanna buy or accumulate farmland and that's how they're gonna farm it. It's sort of like the Soviet Union or Mao's cultural evolution. It's top down and it results in disasters. Speaker 4: The UN Food and Agriculture Organization in 2013, they put out this very bizarre report, and they said we need Westerners to start eating bugs. And that wasn't on anybody's radar. We didn't eat bugs. It's disgusting. And so they said, we need a massive propaganda campaign in the media to convince them that they're gonna save the planet, well, we're seeing that. NPR, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the BBC, even Fox News, right, they've been Peddling this idea that bugs are delicious and nutritious. Now you got all these celebrities eating bugs and teaching people that it's trendy and cool to eat bugs. And as speak. They are right now building the largest insect protein processing facility on the planet outside Decatur, Illinois. They're building another one up in Canada. They know there's not really demand for bugs right now. Right? How many Americans do you know that are clamoring for cricket sandwiches? Right? Practically none. And so I expect that as these food shortages develop, as the price of staples goes through the roof, people will say, okay, I'm really hungry. My kids are really hungry. I can't afford
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 8:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Covid lockdowns transformed our perception of cities. Carlos Moreno, the inventor of the 15-minute city concept, believes they desensitized us to being confined within our neighborhoods. This pandemic also brought the 15-minute city idea into the spotlight. Lockdowns restricted movement, forcing people to shop local and work from home. It's a game changer. #ClimateScam #NetZero #15MinuteCities

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Inventor of the '15 minute city' concept, Carlos Moreno: Covid lockdowns were a "game changer", because they desensitised people to being restricted to their own neighbourhoods. "Professor Moreno says the Covid-19 pandemic was also a game changer, with the 15 minute city concept brought into the limelight. The lockdowns meant people were often restricted to only moving around their neighbourhood, and they had to shop local and to work from home." Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Obs9Xh875Lg… For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #ClimateScam #NetZero #15MinuteCities

Video Transcript AI Summary
The 15 minute city concept, according to Carlos Moreno, is directly linked to climate change policies. He emphasizes the need to reallocate road space to pedestrians and cyclists and invest in nature-based solutions. Transforming cities to reduce CO2 emissions from transportation and optimize building usage is crucial in fighting climate change. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the importance of the 15 minute city concept as people were restricted to their neighborhoods, leading to increased local shopping and working from home. Mass transportation was avoided, resulting in more walking and cycling for transportation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This summer's heat wave in Europe has been another reminder of the warming world. And Carlos Moreno says climate change policies are directly linked to the 15 minute city concept. The global warming is, at the core of the emergence of the 15 minute city concept. He says that policies of permanently reallocating road space to pedestrians and cyclists and investing in nature share based solutions must be pursued. Inside the, cities, we have 2 sectors, the Transportation and buildings. I said at this moment, if we wanted to the Fight radically against climate change. We needed to transform our cities for reducing the the emission of CO 2 by the transportations and to optimize the uses of buildings. Professor Moreno says the COVID nineteen pandemic was also a game changer with the 15 minute city concept brought into the limelight. The lockdown meant people were often restricted to only moving around their neighborhood, and they had to shop local and to work from home. They also stayed away from mass transportation with an uptick in walking or cycling to get around.
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 4:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A preprint study suggests Omicron and nearly 400 other variants are not natural mutations but rather artificial creations. The Wuhan lab leak may just be the beginning. Interesting analysis: [link]. Let freedom sing: [link].

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

It seems the Wuhan lab leak is just the tip of the iceberg. A recent preprint study by Japanese researchers indicates not only is Omicron artificial but almost 400 purported variants are not natural mutations but rather well ordered systematic and artificial worldwide lab creations. 😳😳😳

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses a study on the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, which suggests that the mutations observed in the variant may not be natural. The researchers found a systematic pattern in the mutations, where certain mutations were removed and then reintroduced in a stepwise manner. This led them to propose the possibility of artificial creation of the variant. The video highlights that this assertion is significant and should be considered in discussions about the origins of Omicron. The study's findings indicate that all 400 variants of Omicron may have been created in a lab rather than evolving naturally. The researchers emphasize the need for further debate and investigation into the origins of the variant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 400 variants of this omicron variant. This is what they found. They put their own tree together. And it sure looks pretty system systematic. So that's BA 1. Now you notice there's white, white stepladder there. The white stepladder there are places where the mutation has been removed. But you notice when it steps down to the next step, that mutation that was removed is put back in And another one is removed, and so on and so forth down this step process. Well, that's interesting. Well, now let's so they looked at 3 variants of Omicron. Now let's look at BA 1.1. Let's look at that image. Same conversation, same image. Speaker 1: So this is like and what they're saying is there's clearly a splice where this is being removed. It doesn't, In the evolution of something, it doesn't grow an arm and then the next day suddenly doesn't have that arm anymore. And then you lose you know, if if we thought about this way as you're going down, On 1 group, you've lost an arm, then the arm is back, but now you've lost a leg, then the leg is back, now you've lost, you know, a foot. And it's perfectly lining up on this graph and that's supposed to be natural and they're saying there's no way this is natural, right? Speaker 0: System. Right. And and and the mutations happen there's there's no uniform way mutations happen. That's that's really the definition of it. They mutate. That's something that you can't it's chaos. Exactly. You can't predict that. So let's look at the so they looked at 3 versions of this. And just to finish that off, we have the BA 2 image. This is the final variant they looked at of prime. Same pattern. So this is what the researchers then write. They say this study aims to point out that SARS CoV 2 has undergone unthinkable mutations based on conventional coronavirus mutation mechanisms. And we hope that the possibility of artificial creation is included in serious discussions on the formation of SARS CoV two variant. So let's go to that. So again Let's Speaker 1: be really clear that I'm getting this right. There was always this thought that it was Omicron created almost to sort of be an antidote to what was happening with Delta. It appears Out of nowhere, there's speculation that this might be coming from a lab. But then even if that happened or, like, if you think the original version, then it starts mutating on its own and it runs in its own life. What they seem to be saying here is that We don't just think the original first omicron came from a lab. We think every single one of these variations of the 400 is coming from a lab because we're seeing this really strange anomaly where each one's being maneuvered, removing the one little part of it in a very systematic manner. So they're saying Omicron didn't, essentially, if they're right, didn't mutate at all. These are just 400 different lab creations that are being spread all over the world. Is that essentially what this is sort of alluding to? Speaker 0: It's a big assertion, And they're very careful with their wording. If you go back and read that article, anybody can get this. They sign up for a newsletter. They'll get it Monday morning. Succinct, the link to this research. It's a very thick read. It's very in-depth. But they're very careful with the wording, but that seems to be what they're suggesting. They're saying, Look, at least at least given this evidence, we need to approach this conversation, have this in the debate when we're talking about the origins of this thing.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

https://open.substack.com/pub/swinehoodsremedy/p/unnatural-evolution-indisputable?r=ue3jo&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post Interesting analysis

"Unnatural evolution": indisputable evidence for deliberate and systematic creation of circulating covid variants Comprehensive panels of "reversion mutations" found in general circulation look like an experiment swinehoodsremedy.substack.com

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

https://rumble.com/v3ho8co-episode-337-let-freedom-sing.html

Episode 337: LET FREEDOM SING ‘NoVax’ Novak Djokovic Wins Moderna-Sponsored U.S. Open; Country Music Star John Rich Tells The Country Truth; Are all COVID Variants Man-made?; Was Every Omicron Variant Man-made?; Africa: The Accide rumble.com
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 2:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
OSHA head Doug Parker denies demanding firings despite vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans. He clarifies that the government aimed to provide clarity on rules, not threaten anyone. Critics question the administration's attempt to rewrite history. Watch the full hearing here: [YouTube link].

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

NEW – OSHA Head, Doug Parker, Now Says 'We Didn't Demand That Anyone Be Fired' Despite Issuing a Vaccine Mandate for 84 Million Americans PARKER: "We didn't threaten anyone but there were companies that were looking forward to clarity from the government about these rules...We didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired." KILEY: "Mr. Parker, you're one of a number of officials in this administration who has come before this committee and tell us now that two plus two doesn't equal four...Has there been some sort of memo going around? Why is the administration insistent on rewriting history?" @KevinKileyCA @RepMaryMiller

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a congressional hearing, Representative Miller questions Assistant Secretary Parker about OSHA's emergency temporary standard that would have required Americans to take the COVID vaccine or provide medical paperwork to their employers. Miller argues that OSHA does not have the power to force 84 million Americans to comply. Parker mentions that the Supreme Court ruled on the matter, but Miller accuses Parker of continuing to press companies to impose vaccine mandates even after the ruling. Miller expresses concern about the consequences for workers who refuse to comply and plans to introduce amendments to strip OSHA of its power. Parker defends OSHA's actions and mentions a proposed rule for healthcare workers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I recognize the representative from Illinois, Ms. Miller. Speaker 1: Thank you, Chairman Kiely. Assistant Secretary Parker, in November of 2021, OSHA released an emergency temporary standard that would have forced 84,000,000 Americans to take an experimental COVID vaccine or provide their private medical paperwork to their employer. Do you think OSHA has the power to force 84,000,000 Americans to take an experimental vaccine. Speaker 2: You're referring to the, Vaccine test rule that, that OSHA promulgated in November of 2021, it did require businesses of a 100 more employees to develop a program that would require employees to either, take the COVID vaccine or get regular testing. Speaker 1: Yes. So what I want to know is, if you believe that OSHA actually has the power to force 84,000,000 Americans to do that. Speaker 2: Well, the Supreme Court ruled on that matter. Speaker 1: Yes, thank God the Supreme Court ruled on that and stopped you from doing that. You're an unelected bureaucrat and you do not have the power to force 84,000,000 people to take an experimental vaccine or show their papers. You tried to fire 84,000,000 American workers, but do you believe the Court was wrong? Speaker 2: You know, the Court made the final decision on on the matter. That's how our Judicial system works. Speaker 1: And after they made that decision after they made that decision, you actually said to Reuters this is a quote: The ruling was unfortunate, but it's not stopping us from pressing employers to take adaptive measures to keep things in place, so did you continue to threaten companies to impose a vaccine mandate even though the Supreme Court told you that you couldn't? And Chairman, I'd like to enter that into the record. Speaker 0: Without objection. Speaker 2: No, we didn't threaten anyone but there were companies that were, That were looking forward to clarity from the government about these rules and to Speaker 1: provide them. They got the clarity from the Supreme Court and you ignored them and continued to press companies to fire American workers. And I am we are curious. What was President Biden and OSHA's plan if 84,000,000 Americans refuse to comply with the vaccine mandate or show their papers. That's categorically Leon Tru, we didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired. You absolutely were promoting that. The Supreme Court stopped you. Thank God. And, in light of considering what would have happened if Americans refused to comply, what was your plan? Speaker 2: Congresswoman, I believe that The American people expect their government to take on the big problems that are facing them. More than a million people. Speaker 1: Okay. Well, I'd just like to say, you were inept. It would have terrorized our economy if the American workers refused to comply and it would have put 84,000,000 American workers out of out out of work. I'm going to introduce amendments to strip you of your power and funding to protect the 84,000,000 Americans who do not wanna show you their vaccine papers and to protect farmers who feed Americans. Mister Chairman, OSHA needs to be reigned in. They have gone far beyond their minor limited mission. Thank you and I yield back. Speaker 0: Mr. Parker, your agency was responsible, for issuing a employer vaccine mandate that would have Applied to 84,000,000 Americans. Now, the Supreme Court, struck that down. It was a Scathing opinion about how OSHA had, well exceeded its authority, in unprecedented ways. Earlier today, you testified, that you didn't demand that anyone be fired. So in your contemplation, if a worker did not comply with the requirements of that vaccination or test rule that you promulgated, what would have happened? What would have Speaker 2: been the consequence for that employee? Well, the the question that I received earlier from the congresswoman from Illinois I referenced our activity after the ruling was issued and so, It was a reference to our efforts post Supreme Court decision. So pre Supreme Court decision, you did demand that people be fired? The rule never went into into Right. Speaker 0: But the rule as you wrote it, as you contemplated, as you wanted to go into effect, it did contemplate that people will be fired. Speaker 2: It was up to the employer. It it didn't prescribe any remedies in the rule for how that would Be implemented. The Supreme Speaker 0: Court noted that hundreds of thousands of people, could have lost their jobs. You disagree with that? Speaker 2: The Supreme Court was making a preliminary decision. It wasn't a final order. They had a limited record in front of them, but You see I don't I would have to go back and reread The ruling, I don't recall that provision. Mr. Parker, you're one of a number now of officials Speaker 0: in this administration who has come before Committee, and tried to tell us the 2 plus 2, doesn't equal 4. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the Secretary of Education, testified. He False testimony to this committee, denying that he had promoted a student vaccine mandate when he had done precisely that. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the Secretary of Health and Human Services made one of the most outlandish statements ever entered into the congressional record, which is saying quite a lot when he said, We never force anyone to do anything In relation to the widely discredited policy of forcing young children as young as 2 years old to wear masks. And now you come before us today, asked about one of the most sweeping, abuses of power, that we've seen that was rebuked by the Supreme Court. And you tell us that we didn't demand that anyone be fired. So Has there been some sort of memo going around? Why is the administration insistent on rewriting history? Speaker 2: All you have to do is read that rule and you will see that it is not A vaccine mandate, it gives employees the option of testing in lieu of a vaccine mandate. Speaker 0: And if they didn't do that, then what would happen to them? Speaker 2: They would, they would be out of compliance with the requirement and our role then would be to, cite the employer. Speaker 0: I want to testify. I want to clarify your earlier testimony as well. Are you saying that, your agency is still pushing forward with a new COVID nineteen rule for health care at this time? Speaker 2: The rule is in, we proposed that rule in, in Well, I don't recall I didn't ask when Speaker 0: you initially proposed it. I'm saying are you still pushing forward with it? Speaker 2: We submitted the rule to the Office of Management and Budget In December of last year, it has remained in review there. Speaker 0: So you're not planning on rescinding it or withdrawing it? Speaker 2: That's a decision that would be made after it goes through the process and I can't comment on it. That's just Speaker 0: You can't comment? You don't have an opinion of whether it should be withdrawn? It's not Speaker 2: a matter of Opinion, it's a matter of me following the rules of the administration. Sure. In, ensuring that we respect the process of working with

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

Full Hearing: https://www.youtube.com/live/cfawhx_QCkk

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 2:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2003, Senator Feinstein sought a briefing on Iraqi WMD allegations. She acknowledged the solid analysis but lacked unequivocal proof. She later admitted being misled by the Bush administration. Her failure to act on the truth stains her soul, with the blood of Americans and Iraqis. Justice awaits her.

@RealScottRitter - Scott Ritter

I met Senator Diane Feinstein once, in the lead up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. She had just recently been assigned to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (in 2001), and it was in that capacity that she had a senior staffer from the committee ask me to come to Washington DC to brief her on Iraqi WMD and the allegations being made by the Bush administration that Iraq continued to possess them. We met in a secure conference room in the Capital building—me, the Senator, and a half dozen staffers and aides. It was a polite, professional affair, with the Senator asking questions and taking notes. Eventually she confronted me—“Your position is causing us some difficulty. You are making the US look bad in the eyes of the world.” I replied that my analysis and the underlying facts were rock solid, something she agreed with. I said that while I knew she couldn’t reveal sensitive intelligence, if she could look me in the eye and say she has seen unequivocal proof that Iraq retained WMD, I’d shut up and go away. She looked at her retinue, and then me. “I have seen no such intelligence,” she replied. She thanked me for the briefing, and said it provided her with “food for thought.” On October 11, 2002, Senator Feinstein voted in favor of the resolution authorizing war with Iraq. Later, she said she had been misled by the Bush administration and bad intelligence. I will forever know Senator Feinstein as someone who had been empowered by the truth, and lacked the moral courage to act on it. The blood of thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis stains her soul. I hope when she stands in judgment before her maker, she is punished accordingly.

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 1:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The leaders of Mexico, Canada, and the US signed the Declaration of North America (DNA). However, skepticism arises due to past experiences with misleading agreements. Let's analyze the six pillars of the DNA: diversity, climate change, competitiveness, migration, health, and regional security. The author dismisses each point as "bullshit." The full breakdown can be found at the provided link.

@AwakenedOutlaw - AwakenedOutlaw⚒️

Apparently, the three compromised idiots supposedly running their respective countries (Mexico, Canada and the US) signed something called the Declaration of North America (DNA) today. Keep in mind that the stone-cold fact is that we've learned over time that whatever [they] tell us something is (e.g. the Affordable Healthcare Act) it's almost certain that the opposite it true...so OF COURSE this agreement would just represent more of the same globalist tripe. So, in an effort to assist those who are still learning this lesson the hard way, I took the liberty of breaking down in detail, point by point, each of the 6 areas of interest that the agreement intends to address. The following is my in-depth/thoughtful analysis: _____ "The leaders are determined to fortify our region’s security, prosperity, sustainability and inclusiveness through commitments across six pillars": 1) diversity, equity, and inclusion Bullshit 2) climate change and the environment Bullshit 3) competitiveness Bullshit 4) migration and development Bullshit 5) health Bullshit 6) regional security Bullshit And there you have it. Good talk. https://whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/01/10/declaration-of-north-america-dna/

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 1:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chairman Jim Jordan highlights key facts in President Biden's impeachment inquiry. Hunter Biden's lack of qualifications for the Burisma board is evident. Executives sought his help due to pressure from Ukrainian prosecutors. Joe Biden's speech attacking the prosecutor aligns with the FBI's confidential source. Whistleblowers confirm Biden's interference, firing prosecutors and slowing investigations. The attempt to protect Biden's involvement failed thanks to brave whistleblowers and a vigilant judge. This inquiry holds immense significance.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

NEW: Chairman Jim Jordan's opening statement for President Joe Biden's impeachment inquiry. "This is a tale as old as time. Politician takes action that makes money for his family, and then he tries to conceal it. Never forget four fundamental facts. Hunter Biden gets put on the board of Burisma and gets paid a lot of money. Hunter Biden's not qualified. Fact number two: to sit on the board, not my words, he said he got on the board because of the brand because of the name. Fact number three: the executives at Burisma ask Hunter Biden to help them with the pressure they are under from the prosecutor in Ukraine. Fact number four: Joe Biden goes to Ukraine on December 9, 2015, and gave this speech attacking the prosecutor that started the process of getting that guy fired. Those facts are consistent with what the confidential human source told the FBI, and the FBI recorded in the 1023 form, the same form that the Justice Department didn't want to let this Committee see. And all those facts all of that was further confirmed yesterday with the information that the Ways and Means Committee released from the whistleblowers Shapley and Ziegler... Joe Biden fired the first prosecutor, and the second prosecutor came in and dropped the charges. That's exactly what they wanted to be done. And the final step is the Biden Justice Department tries to sweep it all under the rug. They slow-walk the investigation. They let the statute of limitations lapse for the most important years, 2014 and 2015, the Burisma years when all that income is coming in. They try to put together this sweetheart deal and get it past the judge. And we learned yesterday they weren't allowed to ask about political figure one. Political figure one is the big guy, Joe Biden. And they would have gotten away with it all except for two brave whistleblowers who sat in those seats two months ago and told their story and a judge in Delaware who said we're not going to let this happen. That's why we're here today. That's why this inquiry is so important."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma, a Ukrainian company, is discussed in this video. The speaker presents four key facts: Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of Burisma and received a large salary despite lacking qualifications; Burisma executives sought his help with a Ukrainian prosecutor; Joe Biden visited Ukraine and criticized the prosecutor, leading to his dismissal; and the Biden Justice Department attempted to cover up the situation. The speaker refers to released communications between Hunter Biden and Burisma, which show efforts to gain support from US officials. The video emphasizes the importance of two whistleblowers and a judge in exposing the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tale as old as time. Politician takes action that makes money for his family and then he tries to conceal it. Never forget 4 fundamental facts. Hunter Biden gets put on the board of Burisma, gets paid a lot of money. Hunter Biden's not qualified, fact number 2, to sit on the board. Not my words, his words. He said he got on the board because of the brand, because of the name. Fact number 3, the executives at Burisma asked Hunter Biden to weigh in and help them with the pressure they are under from the prosecutor in Ukraine. Fact number 4: Joe Biden goes to Ukraine on December 9, 2015, Keane gives the speech attacking the prosecutor that starts the process of getting that guy fired. Those facts, by the way, are consistent with what the confidential human source told the FBI and the FBI recorded in the 10/23 form. The same form That the Justice Department didn't want to let this committee see. And all those facts, all of that was further confirmed yesterday with the information that the ways and means committee released from the whistleblowers, Shapley and Ziegler. Here's a communication from Hunter Biden to an executive with Burisma, Devin and I do feel comfortable with Blue Star strategy strategies and the ability of Sally and Karen to deliver. Hunter Biden put Burisma in in touch with Blue Star Strategies. What were they going to deliver? Well, that was in a communication release yesterday as well. US officials in Ukraine and in the United States need to express support for Burisma and Nikolai Zhalsevsky To the highest level decision makers: the president of Ukraine, the president's chief of staff and the prosecutor general. That's what they were going to deliver. And were they successful? The interior minister confirmed that Zolachevsky is no longer wanted. We won in less than a year communications between the folks at Blue Star and Eric Sherwin, who was Hunter Biden's business partner partner, awesome work! Congratulations to you guys! Those are the communications. That's what they got done. And remember, when this happens in October 2016, When they, when the pressure is taken off, the case is dropped against Olechowski, this is the 2nd prosecutor. Joe Biden fired the first one, the 2nd prosecutor comes in, Drops the charges! That's exactly what they wanted done! And the final step the final step is the Biden Justice Department tries to sweep it all under the rug. They slow walked the investigation, they let the statute of limitations lapse For the most important years 14 and 15, the Burisma years when all that income's coming in, they try to put together this sweetheart deal and get it past the judge. And we learned yesterday in the search warrant in the search warrant examining Hunter Biden's electronic communications, They weren't allowed to ask about political figure 1. Political figure number 1 is the big guy, is Joe Biden. And they would have gotten away with it all. They would have gotten away with it all except for 2 brave whistle blowers who sat in those seats 2 months ago and told their story, and their story has stood up. 2 brave whistleblowers and a judge in Delaware who said, We're not going to let this happen. That's why we're here today. That's why this inquiry is so darn important. It's it's the oldest story in the world and those are the facts. I yield back.
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 1:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
New evidence reveals President Biden's involvement in his son's business dealings, including connections to a Chinese executive. The IRS whistleblowers' testimonies highlight a concerning link between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners. Hunter Biden leveraged his father's position for personal gain, securing favors and payments from foreign sources. The DOJ's attempt to divert attention from Joe Biden raises questions. The IRS interview with James Biden was restricted from discussing Joe Biden's involvement in Hunter's deal with a Chinese energy company. Suspicious tax payments and an Assistant US Attorney's reluctance to investigate further add to the controversy.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

NEW: Chairman Jason Smith's opening statement for President Joe Biden's impeachment inquiry. "Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee released new documents showing President Biden was not just aware of his son's business dealings, but he was connected to them. And a newly released message to a Chinese business executive Hunter Biden mentions preserving the 'keys to my family's only asset,' that asset being Joe Biden. New evidence released in response to questions raised by members of the committee on both sides when Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, the two IRS whistleblowers, testified in July paints a disturbing picture of a revolving door between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners. According to a worksheet provided by IRS whistleblower Ziegler, then Vice President Biden's April 2014 official visit to Ukraine occurred only days after a series of White House meetings with Hunter Biden and his business associates regarding Ukraine. Shortly after Joe Biden returned stateside, the Ukrainian company Burisma announced Hunter Biden's appointment to its board. New evidence provided shows Hunter Biden using his father's position to gain favor with billionaire Miguel Alemán including having Joe Biden host them at the White House in February of 2014 at the Vice President's residence alongside Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim in November of 2015. And then, in 2016, he used Air Force Two to shuttle Hunter Biden and his business associate to Mexico City. Whether it was lunches, phone calls, White House meetings, or official foreign trips, Hunter Biden cashed in by arranging access to Joe Biden, the family brand. The Biden family and their associates received millions in payments from foreign sources, including from Russia, China, Ukraine, and Romania. In one email, Hunter Biden even bragged that he cut a deal for 10 million from just one company for "introductions alone." And yet the DOJ wanted to keep the spotlight as far from Joe Biden as possible. One of the items we released yesterday was an IRS interview with James Biden, the President's brother, in September of 2022. The agency was barred in the interview from asking him about Joe Biden, and about whether Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden's deal with a Chinese energy company. And when Hunter Biden had his tax liability of over 2 million, mysteriously paid for by a Democrat Party donor named Kevin Morris, who we barely knew, something IRS investigators saw as a possible campaign finance violation. Assistant US Attorney Lesley Wolf said she did not want any of the agents to look into the allegation... This is the same Attorney Wolf, who, in an email, we released yesterday, responded to IRS investigators seeking approval for a search warrant with 'there should be nothing about Political Figure One in here.' That being a reference to Joe Biden."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Newly released documents from the Ways and Means Committee reveal that President Biden was connected to his son's business dealings. Hunter Biden mentioned preserving the "keys to my family's only asset" in a message to a Chinese business executive. Evidence suggests a revolving door between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners, with meetings occurring before Hunter's appointment to the board of a Ukrainian company. Hunter Biden used his father's position to gain favor with billionaire Miguel Aleman and received payments from foreign sources. The DOJ seemed to avoid investigating Joe Biden's involvement, as seen in an IRS interview with James Biden. The Biden family sold access to Joe Biden's power, and the Biden Justice Department protected their brand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, the Ways and Means Committee released new documents showing President Biden was not just aware of his son's business dealings, but he was connected to them. In a newly released message to a Chinese business executive, Hunter Biden mentions preserving the, quote, keys to my family's only asset. That asset, Joe Biden. New evidence released in response to questions raised by members of the committee on both sides when Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, the 2 IRS whistleblower Testified in July paints a disturbing picture of a revolving door between Joe Biden's office and Hunter Biden's business partners. According to a worksheet provided by IRS whistleblower, Ziegler then Vice President Biden's April 2014 official visit to Ukraine occurred only days after a series of White House meetings with Hunter Biden and his business associates regarding Ukraine. Shortly after Joe Biden returned Stateside, the Ukrainian company Burisma announced Hunter Biden's appointment to its board. New evidence provided shows Hunter Biden using his father's position To gain favor with billionaire Miguel Aleman, including having Joe Biden host them at the White House in February of 2014 At the Vice President's residence along side Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim in November of 2015 And then in 2016 using Air Force 2 to shuttle Hunter Biden and his business associate to Mexico City. Whether it was lunches, phone calls, White House meetings, or official foreign trips, Hunter Biden cashed in by arranging access to Joe Biden, the family brand. The Biden family and their associates received 1,000,000 in payments from foreign sources, including from Russia, China, Ukraine, Romania. In one email, Hunter Biden even bragged that he cut a deal for 10,000,000 from just 1 company for quote, introductions alone. And yet the DOJ wanted to keep the spotlight as far from Joe Biden as possible. One of the items we released yesterday was an IRS interview with James Biden, the President's brother In September of 2022, the agency was barred in the interview from asking him about Joe Biden, and about whether Joe Biden was involved in Hunter Biden's deal with a Chinese energy company. And when Hunter Biden had his tax liability of over 2,000,000 mysteriously paid for by a Democrat Party donor named Kevin Morris, so he barely knew something IRS investigators saw as a possible campaign finance violation. Assistant US Attorney Leslie Wolf said she did not want any of the agents to look into the allegation. Behind on the board are notes Agent Chapley took from that meeting. He notes that Wolf told investigators that she was not personally interested in pursuing it. This is the same Attorney Wolf who in an email we released yesterday responded to IRS investigators seeking approval for a search warrant with quote, there should be nothing about political figure 1 in here, that being a reference by definition of Joe Biden. The Biden family sold access to Joe Biden's power and the Biden Justice Department protected the Biden brand. We must continue to follow the facts.
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 1:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Biden allegedly met with corrupt oligarchs from Russia, China, and Ukraine after they paid his son millions. Foreigners delivered cash to the Bidens, followed by dinner with Joe. This direct evidence suggests corruption and bribery.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

WATCH: @RepPatFallon lays out the evidence of President Joe Biden meeting with corrupt oligarchs from Russia, China, and Ukraine after they paid his son Hunter Biden millions of dollars. "You have foreigners that deliver pallets of cash to the Bidens, and then they have dinner with Joe... This is direct evidence of corruption and bribery."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Joe Biden repeatedly denied discussing business with his son, but evidence suggests otherwise. Hunter Biden's business associates testified that Joe Biden met with them, took photos, played golf, and even gave White House tours. Russian oligarchs wired millions to Hunter Biden, and they had dinner with Joe Biden. The CEO and CFO of Burisma, a corrupt company, paid Hunter Biden's shell companies millions, and they also had dinner with Joe Biden. A confidential informant, described as highly reliable, revealed that Vadim Posarski admitted hiring Hunter Biden to protect them through his dad. CEO Zolcevsky confirmed that Hunter Biden would handle corruption issues through his dad. Zolcevsky was being investigated by a Ukrainian prosecutor, whom Joe Biden pushed to remove. After the prosecutor was fired, Hunter Biden and the Burisma board demanded an end to the investigation. The Bidens delivered, and the investigation was dropped. The financial transactions and conversations suggest corruption and bribery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's Joe Biden's words from August 28, 2019. First of all, I have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything to do with their business. From September the same year, I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings. October same year quote, I don't discuss business with my son. Were Joe Biden's words true? No. They were false. So why did he lie repeatedly. In an interview back in 2019 with the New Yorker even Hunter admitted that he talked to his dad about business specifically Burisma. Many of Hunter Biden's business associates have testified Joe Biden met with them. 2 of the ones closest to Hunter, Rob Walker and Devin Archer were among them. So they not only spoke to him, they took a lot of the business association, associates took photos with him, they played golf with him, They gave Joe Biden gave them White House tours. He wrote letters of recommendation for their children and shared fancy dinners as well. Let's also talk about patterns, Erie, Lyuzkov and Yelena Badarina. They are Russian, they're married, they were married, Russian oligarch billionaires. Michael McFall, the US ambassador to Russia ID'd Luzkov as being corrupt. Yelena Badarina wires $3,500,000 to Hunter Biden. Soon thereafter, who does she have dinner with? Then Vice President Joe Biden, Kenaz Raskov Rakeshv rather and Karim Mazimov, Kazakhstani nationals, Masimov used to be the Prime Minister is now in prison. Rakhacheffe wires $142,300 to Hunter Biden. The very next day Hunter Biden buys a Porsche for $142,300 and then soon after, who do you think Kenis Rakhachev has dinner with, say it with me, then Vice President Joe Biden, Vadim Psarsky and Mikcolo Zolcevsky, The CEO and CFO of Burisma, US Ambassador to Ukraine Jeffrey Pyatt calls Zolchevsky a poster child of corruption. Those 2 fellas paid Hunter Biden's shell companies a total of $3,300,000 and who do you think Madame Posarski had dinner with? Again, say it with me all at once, then Vice President Joe Biden. So here's a pattern, you have crooked foreigners that deliver pallets of cash to the Bidens and then they have dinner with Joe. And apparently Joe Biden has won hell of an expensive dinner date. And if that's not selling political access, I don't know what is. My Democratic colleagues report ad nauseam when they talk to the media that there's no direct evidence linking Joe Biden to his son's crimes. Really? This is a FD 1023 which is used by the FBI when confidential informants give them information. This 10/23 is only as good as the source. It could be garbage or it could be gold. The FBI describes this source as somebody that is highly reliable and very trust trustworthy. In fact, they worked with him for over a decade and paid him well over $100,000. What he has given to them is always checked out. This, ladies and gentlemen, is gold. Consider this with weight and gravity. So what does this say? I don't know what the confidential informant's name is so I'm gonna call him Ivan. Ivan is not his real name but Ivan describes Vedam Posarski directly admitting to him in a confidential conversation that they hired a not so smart Hunter Biden to protect us quote, through his dad from all kinds of problems. Then Ivan speaks directly to CEO Zolcevski and Zolcevski confides that Hunter Biden will take care of those corruption issues through his dad. Zolcevsky is being investigated by Viktor Shokin, a Ukrainian prosecutor. Joe Biden suddenly begins to call for Shokin's removal. Now Ivan is also told by Zolzhevsky that it will it cost him $5,000,000 to pay 1 Biden and 5,000,000 to pay the other. This is direct evidence of naked corruption and bribery. Zolchevsky also admitted to Ivan that both Bidens pushed him to pay them to keep Hunter Biden on the board. Please keep in mind these were confidential conversations. Also interesting that Zolcevski referred to Biden as the big guy and I doubt he knows Tony Bublinski. Shokin seized 2 homes, land and a Rolls Royce from Zolshevsky. When he was fired the Ukrainian president admitted in a phone call to none other than Joe Biden that he he'd joking and didn't do anything wrong but at your behalf we fired them. And then a $1,000,000,000 of aid that was being withheld was given to Ukraine. And lastly, after Shokin was fired, Hunter Biden and the other members of the Burisma board wrote a letter to the new prosecutor demanding that Zolzhevsky the investigation into Zolzhevsky ended. And you know what? Shockingly, it did. The message was sent and the Bidens delivered. Mister Dubinsky, in your experience in financial investigations, you you follow quote unquote, you follow the money. If you were investigating this and looking at $5,000,000 payment from Burisma to Joe Biden, what kinds of information or patterns would you be looking for? Speaker 1: Well, I'd I'd wanna know who, what, when, where, and why? What's going on? Why is why is the money moving? What's it for? What's the substance behind it? And and talk to people. Look at documents and talk to people. That's what we do in investigations. I I would venture to say everybody in this chamber if they were the CEO of a company and they saw money moving like that within their own company, they'd wanna get to the truth. They'd wanna find out why is that money moving? Why is somebody paying that money out? Those are the questions that need to be asked and get to the bottom of.
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 1:07 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

At Eagle Pass discussing the border crisis

Saved - September 29, 2023 at 12:58 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

The $50+ billion State and Foreign Ops appropriations bill cuts a BLANK CHECK for Joe Biden to fund his proxy war in Ukraine. Ukraine is not the 51st state! My amendment would stop the flow of American taxpayer dollars to fuel this war. It’s time for peace.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker proposes an amendment to stop funding Ukraine, claiming that the US has taken over the country and is fighting a proxy war without public approval. They argue that the US is providing extensive financial assistance, military equipment, and weapons to Ukraine, totaling $113 billion in 2022 alone. The speaker criticizes the state and foreign operations bill for granting Ukraine a blank check, allowing the State Department to bypass oversight. They express concern that this funding will perpetuate endless war and bring the conflict to American soil. The speaker cites polling data showing that a majority of Americans oppose further funding for Ukraine and believe the US has already done enough. They argue that taxpayer dollars should be used to secure the US southern border and combat issues like human trafficking. The speaker urges the adoption of their amendment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Chair. My amendment would prohibit funds from being provided to assist Ukraine. Over a year and a half ago, Russia invaded Ukraine. But now the United States has basically taken over Ukraine and it's fighting a proxy war in Ukraine that we never voted for. We are funding their government, we are paying for their small businesses, we are paying their farmers, we are handing military equipment and weapons over to Ukraine, and paying for their war. According to the Congressional Research Service, in 2022, the United States provided $113,000,000,000 in total assistance to Ukraine. Every single year the United States spends 1,000,000,000 of dollars on foreign aid, much more than any other country. Ukraine has now taken the top spot. The $50,000,000,000 state and foreign operations bill includes an unspecified funding amount for Ukraine. Section 7046(b2) would make funds available for Ukraine to support the ability of the government of Ukraine to Defend their sovereignty and withstand the impacts of Russia's invasion, combat corruption, and promote transparency and democracy. This is nothing more than a blank check for Ukraine that Joe Biden's State Department will get to write. And even more dangerously, they get to waive oversight claiming national security. All this will do is fuel another never ending war and pushed the United States even closer to the brink of nuclear holocaust. After Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan wars, Haven't we had enough of taxpayer funded state and foreign operations? They tell us we have to fight them over there, So we don't have to fight them over here. But paying for wars in foreign countries will eventually have consequences on our country. And we will bring the war to America, and we will end up fighting them here when countries have had enough of the United States. After a year and a half of being engaged in this conflict, the American people no longer support the additional assistance to Ukraine. My amendment will help stop this brutal war and help push for peace in Ukraine, which should be our ultimate goal. It needs to be recognized that we represent the American people. And the polling shows very clearly the American people do not support continuing to fund A war in a foreign country when our own country is being has been having a war waged on us by the Mexican cartels. 55% of Americans say the U. S. Congress should not authorize additional funding to Ukraine. 51% say the U. S. Has already done enough to help Ukraine. Americans demand Their hard earned tax dollars be used to secure our own southern border and stop the Mexican cartels war on America It's killing 300 Americans every single day. That's human trafficking, sex trafficking. You want to talk about women and children? We should care about the women and children They're being trafficked at our own southern border. Not pay to defend another foreign country, and worry about another country who, by the way, is not the 51st state. We only have 50 states in the United States of America and our tax dollars should pay to defend our states here. I urge the House to adopt my amendment and that with Mr.
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 12:52 AM

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Joe Biden and Antony Blinken have depleted the US military weapons supply by sending BILLIONS of dollars of OUR weapons to Ukraine. My amendment would prevent the Biden administration from putting our national security at risk to fuel their proxy war in Ukraine.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker opposes sending defense articles and services from the US to Ukraine, arguing that they should be used to defend the US border instead. They claim that veterans in their district prefer fighting against Mexican cartels at the southern border rather than supporting Ukraine. They criticize the Secretary of State for prioritizing Ukraine and accuse the Biden administration of depleting US military readiness. The speaker also expresses concern about China's growing strength and accuses the government of lying about the need to support Ukraine to prevent China from invading Taiwan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister chair. My amendment would prohibit the secretary of state from using funds to initiate a drawdown and delivery of defense articles and services from the Department of Defense stocks to Ukraine. Those those stockpiles of our equipment and weapons are for the United States of America and should not be sent to Ukraine. I will reiterate and remind everyone Ukraine is not the 51st state. Just this past weekend when we were sent home, I had an emergency See town hall in my district, and many of my constituents showed up. Most of them were veterans, and they made it very clear to me that they would rather fight a war at our southern border against the Mexican cartels that are leading an invasion into our country. Thousands and thousands every single day, smuggling deadly Fentanyl across our border, many other drugs, and killing 300 Americans every single day than they ever support a single penny of their hard earned dollars to go fight a war in Ukraine. Our veterans are fed up, and there's 22,000,000 of them in this country. They want our our border defended. The Secretary of State plays a central role in the initiation and coordination of these drawdowns, and they put Ukraine first. Since August 2021, the secretary has exercised authority delegated by the president to direct 44 drawdowns of defense articles and services from the United States Department of Defense to Ukraine, which by the way is not the 51st state. As our southern border is being invaded every day. Joe Biden and Antony Blinken are shipping all of our weapons and equipment to Ukraine. Nearly a week ago, President Biden announced that the Department of Defense is sending an additional security assistance package valued up to 325,000,000 more American hard earned tax dollars, which would include AIM 9 m missiles for air defense, additional ammunition for high mobility artillery, rocket systems, Avenger air defense systems, 50 caliber machine guns to counter unmanned aerial systems, 155 millimeter artillery rounds, 105 millimeter artillery rounds, 2 blanche optically tracked wire guided missiles, Javelin and AT dash 4 anti armor systems, over 3,000,000 rounds of small arms ammunition, 59 light tactical vehicles, demolitions, munitions for obstacle clearing, and spare parts maintenance and other field equipment. By the way, that also goes with our money paying farmers in Ukraine while our farmers are going broke, paying small businesses in Ukraine while our small businesses are going out of business under Biden's ridiculous inflation. This is America last across the board. This security assistance package will utilize assistance previously authorized under presidential drawdown authority for Ukraine. This is utterly disgraceful. This administration will continue to deplete our military readiness and strength in favor of fueling another forever war in Ukraine that the American people no longer support. While our own country is weakened and destabilize by the invasion the daily invasion of our border at the southern border and the northern border. And while we go even further in debt, fighting Russia in Ukraine, not even defending our own border. China is getting stronger. They are beating us economically, they are growing their military, growing their equipment, and they're not wasting it in some other countries, defending their border. They're saving it up to fight us. I am sick and tired of hearing we have to fight Ukraine in order to stop China from invading Taiwan. That is the biggest lie that is being told to the American people. Mister chair, I reserve.
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 12:22 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Eagle Pass

Saved - September 28, 2023 at 9:01 PM

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

mRNA is poison and must be destroyed and wiped off the face of the Earth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am here today to address the WHO's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. However, it is important to understand that all mRNA vaccines, regardless of what they encode for, pose a threat to life. The danger lies in the immune system's ability to recognize non-salty substances, which should not be allowed. It is crucial to remember that the WHO is a private club funded by Bill Gates and German taxpayers, who are pushing for mRNA vaccination. We must not allow our children to be vaccinated as it will alter their personality, change their brain, and weaken their heart. Injected mRNA vaccines will cause severe damage and should be prohibited.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now if I am here today, it's for a very special reason. 4 weeks ago, I don't know where you saw the video, released by the WHO where they proclaimed that it was their intent to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations on earth and then go from there to treatment of all other diseases including cancer, etcetera. What people do not understand is that all mRNA vaccines are dangerous and are going to threaten life. It does not matter whether the vaccine encodes for the spike protein, for the measles protein, for rubella, for the flu. It does not matter at all. Why? Because the whole danger of the vaccine stems from the ability of the immune system to recognize non salty. This cannot be allowed to happen. Even if the WHO said so. Don't. And remember, this is the last thing I want to say. The WHO is a private club, like a private Football Club. A club that is being financed, has been financed at the top by what? Bill Gates, Bill Gates is now number 2. Who is the top financier? Germany. The German taxpayers of financing the WHO and enforcing mRNA vaccination. You can't do this. You can't let your children be vaccinated because they are changing mankind. All your personality is going to be changed. Your brain is being changed and your heart is being weakened. Every injected mRNA vaccine is going to cause severe damage in our body It must be forbidden. Thank you.
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 12:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
My amendment to FIRE Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin passed in the House. His leadership has failed, damaging our military. This is the first time the Holman rule holds a Biden official accountable. It's time for more action.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

I’m proud to let you know my amendment to FIRE Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin just passed on the House floor. Under his failed leadership, our military is being destroyed and he doesn’t deserve to serve any longer. This is the first time in the 118th Congress the Holman rule has been used to hold a Biden official accountable. It’s time for more.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My amendment to fire Secretary Lloyd Austin using the Holman Rule just passed on the House floor. This is the first time we've used the Holman Rule in years. It's an important tool for Congress to fire federal officials. Secretary Austin deserves to be fired because of his failure in Afghanistan, low military recruitment, and forcing 8,000 troops out for refusing the COVID vaccine. Confidence in his leadership is lost. My amendment reduces his salary to $1. Share the good news!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm proud to let you know that my amendment using the Holman Rule to fire secretary Lloyd Austin just passed on the house floor. This is the first time in the 118th Congress that we have used the Hohmann Rule. This is the first one introduced. As a matter of fact, it's the first time the Homan Rule has been used in years. The Homan Rule is a very important tool that members of Congress can use to fire federal government officials. And Lloyd Austin, the secretary of defense of the United States, definitely deserves to be fired. He failed in Afghanistan. Military recruitment as it is in an all time low, and he forced 8,000 military troops out of the military because they refused the COVID vaccine. There's a lost in confidence in Lloyd Austin's leadership, and he deserves be fired. So my amendment to to fire him using the holding rule, reducing his salary down to $1, and $1 is too much just passed on the House floor. Share the good news, everyone.
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 9:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
House Dems blame Trump for Afghanistan failure, but it's on Austin, Biden, and admin. Trump wouldn't have left Afghans in ruin under terrorists. I passed House amendment to FIRE Austin. Dems need accountability.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

House Democrats want to blame President Trump for the failure in Afghanistan that lies squarely on the shoulders of Lloyd Austin, Joe Biden, and his admin. President Trump would have never left the Afghan people in complete ruin and controlled by a terrorist government. Lloyd Austin is a failure and I just passed an amendment on the Floor of the House to FIRE him.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that President Trump should not be blamed for the failure in Afghanistan, placing the responsibility on Secretary Lloyd Austin, President Biden, and his administration. They argue that President Trump would not have abandoned military equipment or left the Afghan people under Taliban control. The speaker urges the adoption of their amendment to use the Holman rule to remove Secretary Austin from his position, claiming that he is leading the military to failure. The speech concludes with the speaker yielding their time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is no excuse. You can't blame president Trump for the failure in Afghanistan. That failure lies on secretary Lloyd Austin, Joe Biden, the president of the United States, and his administration. President Trump would have never led our troops to failure in Afghanistan would have never abandoned $7,000,000,000 worth of military equipment. And president Trump would have never left the Afghan people in complete ruin and be controlled by a terrorist government, the Taliban. That is a complete excuse. Democrats need to stop blaming president Trump and his administration for Joe Biden's failures. I urge the house to adopt my amendment, madam chair. To take secretary Lloyd Austin salary using the Holman rule. Which is a rule that allows us to fire failures that are serving our government and serving our country. Lloyd Austin is not serving the United States military. Lloyd Austin is leading it into failure. And with that, madam chair, I yield.
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 2:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Spain, it feels like D-Day as troops land on beaches. Government should sink boats to halt influx, creating expenses and slowing or stopping them entirely.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

This is Spain. It sort of seems like D-Day. Their troops are landing on the beaches. Then at the end of the video their troop carriers head back to bring more reinforcements. If the government was at all interested in stopping this, they would be sinking those boats so they can't be used again. Create expenses for them and it will slow them down or bring it to a stop entirely.

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

It’s not a border crisis, it’s a plot. It’s not immigration, it’s an invasion. It isn’t spontaneous, it’s coordinated. Western civilization will be gone within a generation. Our grandkids will hate us. https://t.co/OlUHWKD1Ba

Saved - September 26, 2023 at 4:19 PM

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

Must watch: Colonel Douglas Macgregor and renowned Economist Michael Hudson on how the ethnic enmity of neocons in the US State Department is the driving force behind US foreign policy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Victoria Nuland is a long-term committed NeoCon with an agenda to garrison the entire world with US forces and forcibly convert it to a democracy they approve of. This agenda stems from a deep-rooted animosity towards Russia, which is not shared by most Americans. Wherever Nuland goes, conflict, crisis, and fighting seem to follow. The national security types, like Nuland, are often seen as crazy and filled with hatred due to their family's Holocaust experiences. They view the rest of the world as potential enemies who want to harm them. This is why people fear the deep state in the US. They are perceived as twisted individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who is Victoria Nuland? Speaker 1: Oh, goodness gracious. All these hard questions are difficult. I I do not know Victoria Nuland personally. I I know Fred Kagan, and his brother Bob is married to her. And she's a long term, committed NeoCon. This is someone I would not characterize as either Democrat or Republic. These are people with this agenda, and the agenda says until the entire world is garrisoned by US forces and is converted forcibly to some form of democracy that we approve of. The world will not be safe, and we must continue to fight. And I think in the in the case of Russia, Russia has special appeal because I think these people have ancestors who came from that region of the world and have a permanent axe to grind with the Russians, which, of course, I don't. I don't think most Americans do, and nor do I think anybody in government should shape policy based on whatever for unhappiness their ancestors, you know, experienced in in a place like Russia. So I I that's a that's a nutshell, but I think that's enough. And wherever she goes, usually, there is conflict, crisis, and fighting. Speaker 0: I I've met the national security types When I was, at the Hudson Institute for many years, and they're crazy. They are filled with hatred, of the stories that they grew up about their family suffering in the Holocaust, and they look at the whole rest of the world as being, Potential enemies that somehow want to put them in the gas chambers, and these are, are twisted people. And indeed, this is why people are afraid of the deep state in the United States. They're they're nuts.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 7:29 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Robert F Kennedy JR Exposes How the US Overthrew the Ukrainian Government in 2014

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2014, riots known as the rebellion occurred in Ukraine, which were secretly financed by USAID, a CIA front, with $5 billion. These riots led to a coup against Ukraine's democratically elected government. A month before the coup, Victoria Noland, a high-level official in the State Department, had a secret call with the US Ambassador, where they discussed selecting a new US-backed cabinet for Ukraine. This raises questions about democracy and whether Victoria Nuland influenced the government. The CIA has a history of overthrowing governments, including democracies, with 83 cases between 1947 and 1997.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2014, there are riots. And it's called the rebellion in Ukraine, which we're not told that we are financing those riots. The newspapers never told us, our government never told us USAID, which is a CIA front, put $5,000,000,000 into funding those riots. Those riots lead to the, to a coup d'etat against the 1st elected democratically elected government of the Ukraine. It was government that refused to choose sides and to say we're gonna be on the side of the west. So we wanted them out. A month before that government is overthrown, Victoria Noland, the part of that the centerpiece of on ideology and who is now a high level official in the State Department, has a secret call with the U. S. Ambassador, which is tape recorded and is now public, which anybody can go and look up, where she is picking the new cabinet for the Ukraine, which for Ukraine, which is which is a U. S. Western cabinet. So they're picking the new government a month before the old government is overthrown. Is that how democracy is that democracy with Victoria Nuland fixed your government? Well, that's the point is USAID doesn't really do and the CIA don't do democracy. The CIA has overthrown, I think, 83 governments between 1947 and 1997. That's a third of the governments on Earth and most of them were democracies. Oh, it doesn't do it doesn't do democracy. It does
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 2:23 PM

@robertdunlap947 - Bob Dunlap🎙

Just another example of, WE HAVE THE MOST EVIL GOVERNMENT IN THE WORLD! I’m not scared of anyone except a Government employee knocking on my door and saying, “we are here to help.” Shut it all down and fire THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT

Video Transcript AI Summary
CIA and FBI whistleblowers have warned that intelligence has been compromised, specifically regarding the origins of COVID-19. A whistleblower from the CIA alleges that a team was paid to change their assessment of the virus's origins. The government has violated the COVID Origins Act by not making all intelligence on the origins of COVID-19 public, as required by law. Additionally, the government has refused to disclose the names of scientists who fell ill at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2019, despite having this information. The speaker expresses concern about the government's comfort with lying to the public and the threat to free speech posed by collusion between the government and social media platforms to censor information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Intelligence dangerously compromised warn CIA and FBI whistleblowers. You're not the only one to report this, of course, but, I was reading your report on it this morning. This is something that you have been warning about for quite some time, and the allegations stem from a whistleblower who has come forward to the house, a whistleblower from the Central Intelligence Agency. I have the letter, the relevant letter here from the House Oversight Committee. The whistleblower alleges that a CIA team was paid to change its assessment of the origins of COVID nineteen. Do I have that broadly correct? Is that your understanding of the of the report. This is obviously a bombshell report, deeply, deeply troubling. I'm glad that the House is going to look into it. We should look into it. What caught my attention is you point out in your article on this that the government has deliberately violated The COVID Origins Act, which this body passed unanimously, which the house passed, the president signed into law. Maybe wasn't so happy about signing it into law, but he did. It is the law of the land and which required that all of the government's intelligence on the origins of COVID be made public. Instead, what the administration did was offer up a summary, which they then in turn heavily redacted. And you point out that in addition, the government refused to the administration refused to report the names of scientists who fell ill at the Wuhan Institution Institute of Virology in 2019 despite the fact they know the names. The intelligence community knows the names. You're absolutely right to say this is a violation of the COVID Origins Act, and I would know because I wrote it. So I'm not very happy about the fact that this administration continues to Flaunt, flout, completely ignore public law passed again unanimously by the United States Senate. For what end? I can't tell. I can't Figure out why in the world I don't know what partisan gain there is to it. Why in the world they want to lie to the American people? You conclude your article by saying the government has become Extremely comfortable with lying to us. Just explain what you mean by that and tell us why you think this is so significant. Speaker 1: Well, sure. And just Just on the very specific point of we were the 1st to identify the 3 people that contracted the coronavirus in China. They were the people working on gain of function Search in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The Wall Street Journal confirmed our reporting 2 weeks later. And then I think it was 1 week after that or a few days after that, the ODNI report came out and it did not reveal this information. And we had multiple sources, The Wall Street Journal. We have no idea if The Wall Street Journal sources were the same. But, I think we're clearly seeing a lot of abuses of power occurring in multiple executive agencies. So we've seen it with the FBI. One of the things that we noted yesterday was that we saw perverse incentives in the FBI to go after so called domestic violent extremism, Pulling an agent off of things like child exploitation onto really hyping a set of cases that particularly appeared to be aimed at spreading disinformation around the idea that there is a significant increase of domestic extremism when we don't think that the evidence shows that. And now we see this report, that came out that suggests that there's an FBI whistleblower who says that 6 of the 7 analysts had said it was a laboratory origin and that they had reversed their position in some exchange for some sort of a salary bonus or some sort of a financial incentive. So, and we've been, you know, so we keep documenting it. We just keep finding agencies and agencies, DHS involved in trying to create a disinformation governance board, I keep, you know, the censorship industrial complex, we just keep finding new parts of it. So in the research for this Testimony, we discovered this deep trust alliance that had, you know, what appears to be ties to the security and intelligence agencies of the United States government Appears to be trying to set itself up, although it's now kind of ghosted after 2021, but appeared to try to set itself up to decide what is Reality and what are fakes for people. And I think it should have a chilling effect, and that that's not how we do free speech in America. We don't have government agencies. We don't have, cutouts or front groups that appear to have support from those agencies Telling the American people what's true, what's false, or telling social media companies behind the scenes what they should be censoring. And just to Speaker 0: that last point, we now know, Thanks to the case Missouri versus Biden that that's exactly what this administration from the White House to the FBI to the State Department to the CDC, to CISA, have all been meeting with the social media companies for years now, giving them direct commands about what to censor and take down naming specific accounts and specific speech they want suppressed threatening the social media platforms if they don't do it. And remarkably, and I'm quoting the court here, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, and there's Huge evidentiary record. Everybody go don't take my word for it. Go read the record. It's all on the record from the district court. What the 5th Circuit said is remarkably, the social media platforms all complied. All of them. They all agreed to be tools of the United States government and to censor what they were ordered to censor, to suppress the speech they were ordered To suppress. You're a journalist. Tell us about the threat to the First Amendment. And by the way, just for the record, I think it's important to establish. The Federal Court of Appeals said directly In no uncertain terms, this was a clear violation of the United States constitution. The first amendment does not allow the federal government to use private companies to censor what they wouldn't be able to do it themselves. And that's exactly what this administration has done. Tell us as a journalist the threat to Free speech to freedom of the press from this kind of collusion between a very powerful government trying to hijack every media company you can get its hands on. Sure. I mean, Speaker 1: if you just start on the issue of the COVID vaccine, for example, public interest advocates spent a very long time Trying to get the pharmacy requiring the pharmaceutical companies to list the side effects of their drugs in their advertisements. Here we saw a situation where People were sharing information about the side effects of the vaccine on Facebook and other social media platforms And the White House demanding that it be taken down, Facebook complying acknowledging that it was often true information. We also saw that Facebook's own internal research showed that actually it increases vaccine hesitancy when you censor, those stories that people are if they wanna be comfortable with a new drug, they need to be able to talk it out a bit. So Facebook told the White House that actually would backfire. The White House insisted Facebook caved in because according to the Facebook executive, Nick Clegg, he said, well, we've got this other Business that we need to do with the White House, which is the data flows, meaning we need to we need the White House to help us negotiate with the Europeans to bring our data back to the United States. So I think the 5th Circuit Court did a great job in identifying the clearly coercive measures, but I don't think it went far enough to because the First Amendment, it prevents the government from abridging or infringing on free speech, offering an incentive to social media platforms such as helping them with their dispute with Europe In exchange for censoring often true content, though, of course, the First Amendment also protects false content, I think it's a very chilling effect. I think it's very disturbing. Anybody that cares about holding powerful entities to account Should be disturbed by what we saw take place on Facebook, on Twitter. And I think that I think we just have to remind ourselves and what disturbs me when I hear sort of the conversation on AI coming into it sort of with a beginner mind, I hear a lot of talk about how to protect the public from harm. We have to protect the public from harm. What people are saying is that we need to censor speech, Censor certain voices, censor disfavored voices because of this idea that it will cause real world harm. This is a well documented phenomenon that Psychologists have measured where over decades, people have just grossly expanded their definition of things that cause harm. And I think that we need to kind of, this should be a moment for a reset that free speech is almost absolute in the United States with a Few exceptions around immediate incitement to violence, around fraud, around child exploitation, but we allow very Open conversation in the United States is what makes this so special. So it's been a chilling effect. As a journalist, I've personally been censored by Facebook. I think the platforms are out of control. Speaker 0: Thank you, Mr. Schoenberg. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 2:26 AM

@cynthiamckinney - Cynthia McKinney PhD

China Joins Forces With the Psychopaths at WEF.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum has had a long-standing partnership with China since 1979. Over the past 40 years, China has experienced remarkable growth and is on track to become the world's top economic power. The focus now is on the quality of this growth, rather than just the quantity. With its emphasis on the 4th industrial revolution, China aims to improve the quality of life for its population. This revolution is highly recognized and supported by Chinese authorities, and it is expected to contribute to the country's continued development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So World Economic Forum has been associated with China since the beginning of its reform and opening up policy. I came to China the 1st time and we had our 1st event in 1979. So we are celebrating 40 years of cooperation. I have witnessed the great, ascension of China. It has become the number 2 and soon, it will be the number 1 economic power, in the world. It's just It's mind boggling, what has been achieved in the last 40 years and I'm sure particularly with its focus on the 4th industrial revolution. China will continue its growth, but it will be more Growth of a qualitative nature, fortunately, and not just quantitative growth because China has now achieved A level of development, which guarantees to large parts of the population, the physical existence. So, the key will be quality of life And so, 4th industrial revolution, which is highly recognized by China and its authorities, will certainly help to do so.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 1:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The world is controlled by a criminal oligarchy, aiming to dominate all resources, including humans. Centralizing power is crucial for their goal. They employ psyops, false flags, and chaos to justify strict control. Digitization, tracking, and censorship suppress opposition. They poison, wage wars, and manipulate populations for easier control. They want us demoralized, compliant, and stripped of basic rights. They harm children for their evil practices. It's time to unite and protect our own. Rise up!

@NoorBinLadin - Noor Bin Ladin

Simply put, the world is run by a criminal cartel of oligarchs. Their aim is to control ALL resources, including humans, on the planet. The complete centralization of power is a prerequisite to achieve that goal. Psyops, false flags and other means of chaos are deployed to justify the imposition of stringent control mechanisms on the population. Digitization, tracking and censorship are used to monitor and quell any opposition. They poison us, mind, body and soul, because sick and weak populations are easier to control. They wage wars, kill and neuter us in a myriad of ways for profit, because smaller populations are easier to manage. They want us demoralized, disconnected, subdued and compliant as they steal everything from us, including our most basic rights. They sacrifice our children for their evil practices and rituals, as many of them are pedos or are blackmailed into joining their club. The time to end this system is now, for what can unite us if not the protection of our own children? RISE UP.

Saved - September 25, 2023 at 1:14 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Why was the CIA at a pandemic simulation event in October 2019?

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a pandemic simulation called event two zero one, the CIA discussed using the pandemic as an opportunity to limit free speech and control government criticism. They aim to flood communication channels with trusted sources and ensure access to specific information. These simulations have been conducted since 2001, with the intention of executing a coup d'etat against American democracy and the bill of rights. This raises concerns about the CIA's actions and their potential impact on society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Called event two zero one, a pandemic simulation that took place in October 2019 in New York. What is the CIA doing in a pandemic simulation? They're not a public health agency. What they're talking about is using this pandemic as a pretext for ramping down totalitarian control. And the first thing they said is We got limit free speech. We can't allow people to criticize government policies. We cannot allow people to talk about a lab leak. They're doing this in October of 2019 Before anybody of us have ever heard of Wuhan. Speaker 1: I believe in the idea that we shouldn't be trying to control communication, but rather flood the zone in a sense with A trusted source. Things we wanna do is work with telecommunication companies to actually ensure that everybody has access to the kind of communications that we're interested in providing. Speaker 0: CIA has been conducting these simulations since 2001. They're practicing how do we use the next pandemic to execute a coup d'etat against American democracy and against the bill of rights? And that is very, very worrying. Everything that they bottled, they did.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 1:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Rick Bright falsely claimed there was no evidence of hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness against the virus. Dr. Robert Malone, on Joe Rogan's podcast, revealed how Bright, Janet Woodcock, and others intentionally sabotaged its use for early Covid-19 treatment. #Misinformation #Covid19

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

"He (Rick Bright) states that the reason (for sabotaging HCQ) was that he believed there was no evidence of hydroxychloroquine being useful for this virus. Now that's false." Dr. Robert Malone with Joe Rogan discussing the Zelenko Protocol by Dr. Vladimir "Zev" Zelenko. He outlines how Bright, Janet Woodcock and others intentionally sabotaged hydroxychloroquine to prevent it from being used for early treatment of Covid-19.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zev Zelenko, the creator of the Zelenko protocol and advocate for Hydroxychloroquine, has made a video exposing a conspiracy between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright. Rick Bright, former head of BARDA, and Janet Woodcock, former head of Operation Warp Speed for Drugs and the FDA, allegedly conspired to restrict the use of Hydroxychloroquine to hospitals only. This strategy, implemented through emergency use authorization, hindered the timely administration of the drug. The motive behind their actions remains unclear. Rick Bright himself admitted to this conspiracy on video, claiming there was no evidence of Hydroxychloroquine's effectiveness against the virus, which is false.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Zev Zelenko, who's a buddy, the guy that came out with the original protocol, the Zelenko protocol, and was the one by the way that wrote the letter to, to Trump advocating for Hydroxychloroquine. Okay. Kind of important to put that together. He's put together a great little video clip in which he clearly documents the conspiracy between Janet Woodcock and Rick Bright to make it so that physicians could not administer Hydroxychloroquine outside of the hospital. And who is Janet Woodcock and who's Rick Bright? Rick Bright was the head of BARDA of BARDA, the Biomedical Advanced Research Directorate, which is the group that, for instance, funded the J and J vaccine and Operation Warp Speed, etcetera. So they're the big ticket funder in health and human service of biodefense products. And who is she? Janet Woodcock, was head of Operation Warp Speed for Drugs and until very recently, head of the FDA. She is known as the person who kind of gets the credit, let's say, for the opioid crisis, for her role at the FDA. So between the 2 of them, was there was some sort of a concerted effort To suppress the use of Hydroxychloroquine? Rick Bright in in videotaped testimony has explicitly spoken about how they conspired to cook an a strategy using emergency use authorization to make it so that Hydroxychloroquine could only be administered in the hospital, which by the way is too late for when hydroxy should be used. And why do they do that? That is what is the unknown and and there's so many whys and hows behind this. I like to say there's a stack of stuff that doesn't make sense that's about this high. Now there is I can't prove, I can't get into Rick's head, I know Rick quite well. I don't know what he's currently working for the Rockefeller. He did a whistleblower case and then he left the government. But all I know is they did this and Rick admits on it on video tape that he did it. And, and he states that the reason was is that he believed there was no evidence of Hydroxychloroquine being useful for this virus. Now that's false.
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 12:59 AM

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On November 8, 2018, Lord Jacob Rothschild spoke in Sothebys New York about the inbreeding in his family “The reason being so that the vast of wealth never leaves the family.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Darren James, head of the Paris branch and youngest son of the Rothschild family, openly discussed the 19th century family policy of keeping wealth within the family. He mentioned that they aimed to maintain love within the family and it was understood that the children would only marry within the family to ensure the fortune stayed within. He acknowledged that such a statement would not be acceptable in today's society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Darren James, who is head of the Paris branch and the youngest of the 5 sons of for Rothschild, gave an astonishingly uninhibited description of the 19th century Rothschild policy have included in the family. I'll thank you for what you read. Make you smile. In our family, we've always tried to keep love in the family. In this sense, it was more or less understood since the children would never think of marrying outside the said our fortune would never leave it. You couldn't write that today.
Saved - September 24, 2023 at 3:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media omits crucial stories: 1) Cattle injected with mRNA vaccines; 2) Kari Lake accuses Ukrainian President; 3) Turbo cancers target youth; 4) Cardiologist reveals COVID shot harms; 5) Data analyst predicts cover-up; 6) CDC exposes risk-benefit ratio; 7) EU politician's fiery message; 8) Oncologist touts fasting for vaccine injuries; 9) Sudden deaths of fitness enthusiasts; 10) Emails reveal Biden's vaccine cover-up. VigilantFox shares more next week. Support appreciated. Follow VigilantNews.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Media LIES By Omission: Ten Stories They Conveniently Left Out This Week #10 - Cattle are being injected with mRNA “vaccines,” but one beef rancher is taking a stand. #9 - Kari Lake makes a fiery accusation against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky #8 - “Turbo cancers” are targeting young people — and it’s likely to get even worse. #7 - Top cardiologist breaks down four mechanisms of harm from COVID-19 shots before the European Parliament. #6 - Top data analyst makes a chilling prediction on how the COVID conspirators will cover up their crimes. #5 - The CDC dropped a bombshell on itself, exposing an alarming risk/benefit ratio. #4 - Brave EU politician delivers an explosive message to the global tyrants, telling them all to ‘go to Hell.’ #3 - Oncologist unveils why fasting for 48+ hours is a potent therapy for COVID “vaccine” injuries. #2 - Fitness enthusiasts, not just athletes, are dying suddenly. #1 - New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID Vaccine Harms from the public. Share and follow (@VigilantFox) for more headlines next week. Articles are included in the thread below.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#10 - Cattle are being injected with mRNA “vaccines,” but one beef rancher is taking a stand. https://vigilantnews.com/post/beef-company-ceo-ill-shut-down-the-company-before-we-ship-a-single-bag-with-mrna-injected-meat

Beef Company CEO: “I’ll Shut Down the Company Before We Ship a Single Bag With mRNA-Injected Meat” mRNA-injected pork has been a thing since 2018. And beef is next on the agenda. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - Kari Lake makes a fiery accusation against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky https://vigilantnews.com/post/kari-lake-makes-fiery-accusation-against-ukrainian-president-volodymyr-zelensky

Kari Lake Makes Fiery Accusation Against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Lake's riposte was swift and sharp. Her interpretation of Zelensky's comments was unmistakable. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - “Turbo cancers” are targeting young people — and it’s likely to get even worse. https://vigilantnews.com/post/top-doctor-explains-why-turbo-cancer-rates-are-likely-to-get-even-worse

Top Doctor Explains Why “Turbo Cancer” Rates Are Likely to Get Even Worse Top Doctor Explains Why “Turbo Cancer” Rates Are Likely to Get Even Worse vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Top cardiologist breaks down four mechanisms of harm from the COVID-19 shots before the European Parliament. https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-mccullough-testifies-the-truth-about-covid-19-mrna-shots-and-the-who-before-the-european-parliament

Dr. McCullough Testifies the Truth About COVID-19, mRNA Shots, and the WHO Before the European Parliament It's time to pull out from the World Health Organization. Dr. McCullough explains why. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Top data analyst makes a chilling prediction on how the COVID conspirators will cover up their crimes. https://vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-makes-chilling-prediction-on-how-the-covid-conspirators-will-cover-up-their-crimes

Ed Dowd Makes Chilling Prediction on How the COVID Conspirators Will Cover Up Their Crimes To avoid accountability at all costs, the people in power need to retain power — even if it takes drastic measures. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - The CDC dropped a bombshell on itself, exposing an alarming risk/benefit ratio. https://vigilantnews.com/post/cdc-drops-a-bombshell-on-itself-exposes-alarming-risk-benefit-analysis

CDC Drops a Bombshell on Itself, Exposes Alarming Risk/Benefit Analysis How many serious adverse events are we causing per million doses? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - Brave EU politician delivers an explosive message to the global tyrants, telling them all to ‘go to Hell.’ https://vigilantnews.com/post/go-to-hell-brave-eu-politician-delivers-damning-message-to-the-global-tyrants

‘Go to Hell’: Brave EU Politician Delivers Damning Message to the Global Tyrants “You belong behind bars. You may even rot in hell for all I care at this point because that's exactly what you deserve if you sell out the people.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - Oncologist unveils why fasting for 48+ hours is a potent therapy for COVID “vaccine” injuries. https://vigilantnews.com/post/vaccine-injury-treatment-fasting-for-48-72-hours-creates-autophagy-the-bodys-detox-process-that-kills-covid-19-vaccine-spike-protein-damaged-cells-and-reboots-the-immune-system

Vaccine Injury Treatment - Fasting for 48-72 hours creates autophagy - the body's detox process that kills COVID-19 vaccine spike protein damaged cells and reboots the immune system The benefits of fasting on COVID-19 vaccine injuries, are now being looked at seriously in the scientific literature. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Fitness enthusiasts, not just athletes, are dying suddenly. https://vigilantnews.com/post/fitness-enthusiasts-are-dying-suddenly-16-sudden-deaths-examined

Fitness enthusiasts are dying suddenly - 16 sudden deaths examined Personal trainers, fitness instructors & influencers, jiu-jitsu, crossfit, gym goers - high risk of sudden death! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID Vaccine Harms from the public. https://vigilantnews.com/post/bombshell-new-found-emails-prove-biden-white-house-hid-covid-vaccine-harms-from-the-public

BOMBSHELL: New-Found Emails Prove Biden White House Hid COVID Vaccine Harms from the Public “Now we have the smoking gun.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Two years ago, I never imagined that I would be reporting on the news every day. It's been a wild ride, and all your support has been incredible. I'm beyond grateful to take this next step with the website. Thank you all. And don't forget to give @VigilantNews a follow. https://t.co/iGBLiJqTX8

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 5:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The NSA led Operation Warp Speed, overseeing COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. CIA, intelligence agencies, and military were involved. Vaccines were developed by NIH, manufactured by military contractors, and labeled by Pfizer and Moderna. Pandemic simulations sponsored by the CIA date back to 2001. Avril Haines, now Director of National Intelligence, participated in Event 201. Opportunities to manage the pandemic intelligently were missed. Lockdowns were imposed despite expert advice against them. Isolation weakens immunity.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. details how the NSA was in charge of Operation Warspeed's COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, the history of the United States bioweapons program, and why Anthony Fauci is the highest-paid government official in history: "The weird thing about the pandemic was this constant involvement by the CIA, the intelligence agencies, and the military. When Operation Warp Speed made its presentation to the FDA committee called VRBPAC. When Warp Speed turned over the organizational charts that were classified at the time, it shocked everybody because it wasn't HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA, or a public health agency. It was the NSA, a spy agency that was at the top and led Operation Warp Speed. The vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH, their own the patents are owned 50% by NIH. Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer, or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors, and basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. This was a military project from the beginning. One of the things I uncovered in my book is 20 different simulations on coronavirus and pandemics. That started in 2001. The first one was right before the anthrax attacks and the CIA sponsored them all. The last one was Event 201 which was in October 2019. And one of the participants was Avril Haines, the former Deputy Director of the CIA, who has been managing coverups her whole life. She did the Guantanamo Bay and others. She is now the Director of National Intelligence which makes her the highest ranking officer at the NSA which managed the pandemic. So you have a spy who is convening these pandemic simulations and in each of these simulations going back 20 years, they're not simulating a public health response. They're not doing things like how do we stockpile Vitamin D. How do we get people outdoors losing weight doing exercise? How do we develop an information grid for all the 15 million front line doctors all over the world so that we can get their information that works and what doesn't work. We had an incredible opportunity to manage a pandemic in a way that was intelligent and sensitive and devastating to the disease, but we didn't do any of those things. It was all about how do you use a pandemic to clam down censorship. How you use it to force lockdowns. By the way, with lockdowns, every pandemic preparedness document that had been adopted by any major public health agencies, whether it was CDC, WHO, European Health Agency, National Health Services of Britain. All of them said you don't do lockdowns, you quarantine the sick, you protect the vulnerable. And you let everybody else go back to work because a lockdown actually amplifies the impacts of the disease. If you isolate people, it makes them more vulnerable, it breaks down their immune system." @RobertKennedyJr @RustyRockets

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the pandemic was misused for control and profit by the pharmaceutical industry and to introduce surveillance measures. They highlight the involvement of intelligence agencies and the military in the pandemic response, with the NSA and Pentagon leading Operation Warp Speed. The speaker claims that vaccines were developed by NIH and manufactured by military contractors, with Pfizer and Moderna acting as fronts. They also mention multiple simulations of coronavirus outbreaks sponsored by the CIA, including one in October 2019. The speaker questions the origins of the virus and the involvement of the CIA and Chinese CDC. They suggest a historical connection between the CIA and bioweapons research, and how the Patriot Act revived the bioweapons arms race.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like you to share with us, if you can, a little about how you feel the pandemic was used to assert control, profit the pharmaceutical industry, grant opportunity to regulate, introduce surveillance, and measures that may otherwise have been resisted. What does the pandemic period tell us about power? And in the event that you became president, how would you address what's happened in the last couple of years? Speaker 1: Well, I I, you know, I I wrote a book about how the pandemic was misused And that it was not, you know, the the the public health response was not a, was not about Public health, it was about it was a militarized and monetized response. It was a pretense for climbing down totalitarian controls. And the weird thing about the pandemic, was this constant, involvement by the the CIA, by the and actually, the intelligence agencies and by the military When Operation Warp Speed made its presentation to FDA, to the committee, they call it VRBPAC committee at FDA. VRBPAC asked for the organizational charts, which were classified up to that time. And when, warp They turned over the organizational charts. The they they shocked everybody because the top organization that had managed Warp Speed was not HHS, which is a public health agency. It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, a spy agency. That was the top, god. That was the top, agency, the lead agency on operation Warp Speed and the pandemic Was the NSA, and the 2nd agency was the Pentagon. And when you start looking at, you know, as it turns out that, You know, the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH. They're they're owned. The patents are owned 50% by NIH, Nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors. And basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid To put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry, but, you know, that's not what they were doing. They were coming from, you know, the this was a this was a military project from the beginning. And the the, you know, so, and then you have, one of the things I detail in my book is these simulations And I uncovered, 20 different simulations, coronavirus and pandemic simulations It started in 2000, in the year in 2001, the first one right before the anthrax attacks. And, and then every year, the CIA was doing these, and the CIA was sponsoring them all. And they were the last one. It was event two zero one, which was in October of 2019. And the participants in there are Avril Haines was the former deputy director of the CIA who has been managing coverups her entire life. She did the Guantanamo Bay and, you know, the I understand it, and it's and she's right. She is now the director that, DNI director of national intelligence, Which makes her basically the highest ranking officer at the NSA, which managed the pandemic. So you have a spy It was convening these pandemic simulations. And in each of these simulations going back 20 years, They're not, they're not simulated, they're assimilating a public health response. They're not doing the kind of things. Do we stockpile vitamin D? How do we get people outdoors losing weight, you know, doing exercise? How do we develop an information grid that all the 15,000,000 doctors, frontline physicians all over the world, were gonna be encountering this disease So that we can get their information about what they're doing that works and what doesn't work and put together a model of, you know, okay, here are the drugs the repurposed drugs that are work, here are the treatments that work. None of that happened. We had an incredible opportunity for managing pandemic in a way that was, you know, Intelligent and sensitive and, and, you know, devastating to the disease. But we didn't do any of those things. It was all about How you use the pandemic to clamp down censorship? How do you use it to, you know, do force lockdowns, which Either way, the lockdowns, every pandemic preparedness document that had been adopted by the major public health Whether it was CDC, WHO, European Outdoor Agency, National Health Services in Britain, All of them said you don't do lockdowns. You you quarantine the sick, you protect the vulnerable, and you, let everybody else go back to work because the lockdowns actually amplify the impacts of the disease. You will. If you isolate people, it makes them more Vulnerable. It makes it, you know, breaks down their immune system. And if you lock them a door, it's gonna spread the respiratory virus. And so all things they were doing were that they were drilling were about clamping down totalitarian controls. And if you look at that event, two zero one, which is still on YouTube, you can still look it up and go to the 4th seminar that day that were, It's broken into 4 parts. And remember, the people who are here, who are they? Abel Haines, the CIA, now, and, DNI Director of national intelligence, who was the CIA deputy director, former, Bill Gates, you know, a lot of Tony Fauci's people, the, that pharmaceutical industries, the big media, Bloomberg, etcetera, all the social media companies. And then somebody odd, who's George Gayo, who's the director of the Chinese CDC. So this is in October Of 2019. Nobody knows about coronavirus there, and yet they're drilling a coronavirus a world global coronavirus epidemic. Nobody's gonna ever hear the word coronavirus. The Chinese first acknowledged it on January 1st or 3 months later. We now know coronavirus was already circulating in Wuhan, and the Chinese knew about it at least by September 19th, so that's a month before that pandemic simulation. George Gao is the Chinese head of the CDC and the the Chinese expert on coronavirus. So clearly, he must have known Coronavirus was circulating on September 19th, a month before that simulation. The Chinese military kicked down the door of Wuhan lab, Went in and took all of the genomic sequences off in the public facing websites and, and started destroying the, you know, all the links between the lab and the virus, and put a military general away in charge of the lab. Oh, they clearly knew that it'd come from the lab and that that it was already circulating. And it circulated out, you know, we we know down the subway line, the subway line that leads to the airport from the lab to the airport. So they knew it up in October, And they had this simulation in New York, and people there, some of those people must have known it was already circulating. And what are they talking about? The 4th simulation that day, and you can go up on YouTube right now and look this up. They talk about how do we, how do we stop people from saying that this came from a lab leak? And the people who are leading that discussion are the CIA director, Ava Haines, deputy director and George Gail from, Chinese CDC and Avril Haines says, no, essentially she's saying George Gail is saying, we got a census of the social media. We gotta stop them from saying it's a lab leak. Anybody who says that needs to be deplatformed. This is, this is, you know, This is 6 months before all this started happening. And then, April Haines says, not only do we have to censor, but we need to Flood the zone with authoritative voices who say who dismissed the idea that this was a lab leak. Well, they were you know, there's even they're incredible soothsayers Or they, you know, or there's something weird going on with this that they were doing it. And that is in the first one. They were doing this again and again. They did it 6 months earlier, the same thing, Another coronavirus epidemic. And they, and I detail all of these in my book, and every one of them the CIA wrote the script for. Now when, when Biden gets in there or when, you know, at the beginning of the pandemic, Mike Pompeo, who's the secretary of state, Is it says, oh, you know, this looks like may have come from Wuhan. We should check this out. Oh, he has 4 different branches of the State Department to do an investigation, a massive investigation about whether it's come from Wuhan. If you read Catherine Even's article on Vanity Fair, she does an amazing job at this, and she shows that intelligence officers came into one of those meetings later on this spring and said, we're shutting This whole thing down because the US government, which means Fauci, but also the CIA, was funding all of that research of that lab? So Fauci was funding, Fauci funded about $26,000,000. The CIA was the biggest funder through USA ID about 64,000,000. And then the Pentagon was the 2nd biggest. So the whole, it wasn't just Fauci, it was the whole US intelligence military apparatus that was basically handing over Cutting edge military technology, bioweapons technology, these Chinese scientists who were messing with It's really a strange thing. And then so then they you know, the intelligence officer shutting down the investigation, which which catch Catherine Heben documents. And then but then Republicans in congress, when Biden comes in, say, hey. You gotta investigate this. Gotta figure out because there's mounting evidence that it can't from the will unlab. So he says, okay. I'm gonna do it. He says, I'm gonna get all 22, US intelligence agencies to get together and and figure this out. And he said, and come back in the end 90 days. Who does he put in charge of it? April Hayes. So she's, you know, then she becomes comes with a thing that says, well, nobody knows, we'll never know. You know, she comes with this report 90 in August of 2021. Nobody knows. We're never gonna be able to find out. The intelligence agencies say that We can't figure it out. And, so it doesn't, you know, it doesn't have good optics at the same person. And, you know, and she continues to be the primary, advisor to president Biden on these, on, you know, on, on coronavirus. I'm just finishing now this book on, the Wuhan lab. And I, you know, I had to kinda put together this history, which was fascinating because, You know, why was the CIA so involved with gain of function and so obsessed with it? And I went back and and kinda trace this history, which is The CIA was created in 1947. And the 1st task that it was given was Operation Paperclip, Which had already been ongoing. The Joint Chiefs were already bringing it over, but that was bringing over all the Nazi weapon scientists, many of them Who were destined for the gallows in Nuremberg and they, and the CIA created these rap lines to smuggle them out from under the nose of Nuremberg prosecutors and bring them over to Fort Detrick and to other, these, you know, weapons labs. A lot of them are nuke scientists, but a lot of them were Bioweapon side of this has. Hitler and, at, or, during had a, a huge bioweapons program I mean, they'd done a lot of work on it. They had a lot of cutting edge stuff. At the same time, the biggest bioweapons program was in Japan, And it was, managed by a scientist called Shiro Ishii, who is just this diabolical Mendeley like scientist Who was doing human experiments that were, you know, as bad as anything that the Nazis did, but he then was, brought into under the US wing and protected from the Russians who wanted to hang him. And they brought all those scientists over that, You know, not it was it was called Japanese paperclip. So on that program, they brought all the Japanese scientists. And those Scientists who initiated the US bioweapons program at its birth, not only imprinted it with a lot of their, you know, cell cultures, etcetera, but also with a lot of their, I would say, ethical elasticity or ethical lacunae. So there, and that continues to, you know, to sort of infect the entire bioweapons program. Now, We put huge amounts of money into bioweapons. In 1969, we had nuclear equivalents. They were bragging that they could kill everybody, basically, everybody in the world for 29¢ a a person, 29¢ a death. This is what they were, you know, this is what they were going for. That's success. They do the opposite of science. They were, you know, scientists are about the opposite of medicine. Medicine tries to save people's lives all of these, you know, microbes, etcetera. And they were trying to enhance the microbes and make them antibiotic resistance, to make them spread faster, to make them deadlier, etcetera. 1969 nits and goes in there and shuts down the whole program and everybody's shocked. And those guys were very angry. And now here's what happens. And they live, they're living in the basements, the Pentagon, and they're trying to bring this back. The CIA is secretly doing bioweapons. They, they, they leave Fort Detrick It's all their cultures illegally, and they store them in these warehouses in New York. And they and they're trying constantly through the neocons Who become their allies to, revive the bioweapons program. Then 9/11 happens. And 911, the neocons ring off of the shelf the Patriot Act, which basically is the beginning of the surveillance state in our country. Nobody reads it. The only Congressman to read it was my campaign manager, Dennis Kucinich. And he was in Congress at that time, and he told me Not 1 copy was available to any congressmen. The 350 act that suddenly appeared the day after 9/11 And that dismantles basically the United States Constitution. Interestingly, that act, which nobody read, Had a provision in it that revokes effectively the Geneva Convention and the Nixon's bioweapons charter. Oh, all of the you know, so it basically relaunched the bioweapons, arms race. There were 2 guys who were blocking it, Patrick Leahy and Tom Dashel. A week later, they're stopping it. They're not gonna let it pass. A week later, they get envelopes filled with anthrax in their offices? Congress is shut down. They're shut up. And while Congress is shut down, the Patriot Act gets passed. And the Patriot Act relaunched the arms race of military begins. And by the way, that anthrax, which was also used as the Excuse for going into Iraq and invading Iraq because Saddam Hussein did it, you know, we were told. It turns out After a 2 year investigation, the FBI came back and said that anthrax was aims anthrax, highly sophisticated. There's only 1 place in the world that could've come from Fort Detrick, which is the CIA Pentagon lab. So at that point, the Pentagon began, began pumping a lot of money into bioweapons, about 2,000,000,000 a year, but they don't wanna do it because they don't know what the Patriot Act is actually, you know, legal, because the Patriot Act, what it says is we're not revoking the Geneva Convention. We're not invoking the bioethics charter, We're making a law that any federal official that violates those 2 bills cannot be prosecuted. So the bill so the treaties are still in place, but, You know, they give an exemption to all federal officials. The Pentagon's not sure that that's legal. And by the way, if you violate those provisions in Geneva, it's The death penalty, you get hanged. They were worried about doing it. So they, instead of putting it in house at the Pentagon, they put it all in NIH in Tony Fauci's shop. It gave him a 68% raise, which is why he became the highest paid federal official in history. He was making more, $450,000 a year. The president only makes 400,000, but it's because of that military, salary, the 68% rate is in military. So he had to do bioweapons development. That's why he was doing data infarction. And then in 2014, 3 of the bugs escaped from labs in the United States, And everybody finds out about it. Congress has hearings, 300 scientists write letters to Obama saying sign a letter to Obama saying you gotta shut down Tony Fauci. He's gonna create an epidemic. Obama shuts down all of Fauci's projects. Orders them closed, has a moratorium, and Fauci doesn't shut them down. He continues doing them, and then he starts shipping everything over to Wuhan where you can do it offshore, out of sight of, you know, these federal overseers and all the nosy scientists like Richard Ebright the others from the Cambridge working group who were horrified by what he was doing. And that's kind of why the short story of why, You know, we're doing all this stuff in Wuhan, other than doing it at University of North Carolina at Galveston, which is where they were doing it before. Bloody hell, Robert.
Saved - September 24, 2023 at 5:44 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

I am a citizen of the United States and have only that passport. No matter what happens, I will fight for and die in America. The United States Congress has not declared war on Russia. If anyone is treasonous, it is those who call me such. Please tell them that very clearly.

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 5:32 AM

@Michael_Yon - Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY 6

Texas invaded under the hand of ‘WEF General’ @GregAbbott_TX. Greg Abbott is the Texas sector chief for World Economic Forum. A traitor to Texas, America, and Civilization now hanging on a thread. Vital report by @SpencerLndqst —

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 5:29 AM

@me150000 - me

On Dec 18, 2020 Democrat Peter Nygard was secretly recorded offered black women money for their eggs, placenta, & the umbilical cord blood rich with stem cells- being "life" for other people. It is worth noting that melanin is worth more than gold by the pound @Sgtnewsnetwork

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are investing in stem cell technology called SCNT, which involves using the egg of a young woman and replacing the nucleus with our DNA. This genetic modification aims to enhance certain traits, particularly those found in curvy, sexy black women from Africa. We believe it is unethical to monopolize this genetic perfection. The practice has been tested in mice, resulting in weight loss and improved physical appearance. However, it is important to ensure the safety of everyone involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The stem cell technology that Peter and I are investing in is called SCNT, which takes the egg of a young, perfect, woman specimen, takes the egg and takes out the nucleus, and puts our DNA in the nucleus. It is going to take out Inclorize? It can feed the other race. And this is part of this genetic, greatness that we don't see in any other race on the planet. It is curvy, sexy black woman from Africa. You girls have a kind of a monopoly on this genetic perfection and we want some of that. And I think it's unethical. They already tested this practice in mice and mouse's fat And Scott, 6 back when it was jumping all the women young, right? And that was first, it's just everybody safe and after
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 3:56 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Many still don’t know just how bad it is. Here is the infamous spirit cooking video. Abramovic writes satanic messages on the walls with pig blood, and splatters blood on a child effigy. Zelensky wants this lady in charge of rebuilding schools…

Saved - September 8, 2023 at 3:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Government authorities requested Starlink activation to sink the Russian fleet in Sevastopol. However, complying would make SpaceX complicit in war escalation. Refusing the request was crucial to avoid involvement in a major act of conflict.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor. If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation.

Saved - September 24, 2023 at 5:29 AM

@me150000 - me

On Dec 18, 2020 Democrat Peter Nygard was secretly recorded offered black women money for their eggs, placenta, & the umbilical cord blood rich with stem cells- being "life" for other people. It is worth noting that melanin is worth more than gold by the pound @Sgtnewsnetwork

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are investing in stem cell technology called SCNT, which involves using the egg of a young woman and replacing the nucleus with our DNA. This genetic modification aims to enhance certain traits, particularly those found in curvy, sexy black women from Africa. We believe it is unethical to monopolize this genetic perfection. The practice has been tested in mice, resulting in weight loss and improved physical appearance. However, it is important to ensure the safety of everyone involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The stem cell technology that Peter and I are investing in is called SCNT, which takes the egg of a young, perfect, woman specimen, takes the egg and takes out the nucleus, and puts our DNA in the nucleus. It is going to take out Inclorize? It can feed the other race. And this is part of this genetic, greatness that we don't see in any other race on the planet. It is curvy, sexy black woman from Africa. You girls have a kind of a monopoly on this genetic perfection and we want some of that. And I think it's unethical. They already tested this practice in mice and mouse's fat And Scott, 6 back when it was jumping all the women young, right? And that was first, it's just everybody safe and after
View Full Interactive Feed