reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
We had a call with the top people at Hilary’s campaign including John Podesta. The Clinton campaign wanted to know what evidence we had of fraud but that’s not how to look at it. The purpose of a recount is to gather evidence that the outcome was correct or not. https://t.co/k5nDSxvh1b
Video Transcript AI Summary
On the Sunday after the election, the speaker received an urgent email from an election integrity advocate, inviting them to join a phone call with the Clinton campaign. Although Hillary Clinton was not present, her campaign manager and other top officials were. They discussed the possibility of requesting a recount in key states. The campaign had concerns about the evidence of hacking, the cost of the recount, and the potential backlash from retracting their concession to Donald Trump. The speaker found it frustrating that the campaign wanted evidence of hacking before considering a recount, as the purpose of a recount is to gather evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Actually examine the physical evidence they had in a way that could potentially detect a cyber attack. So the first question, and really the beginning of this whole process for me, was on 13th, on the Sunday after election day. I was on a flight from New York to Los Angeles when I got a frantic email from Barbara Simons, another election integrity advocate. The email said, can you join a phone call in 15 minutes? It's with the Clinton campaign.
Hillary herself might be on the call. Well, what do I do? I'm on a flight, so I find a way to work around the airplane Wi Fi's attempts to block Skype and so forth, and find a way to dial into the call. It doesn't work well enough for me to talk on this 1st call, but I can listen in, and I can hear what they're saying. Clinton herself isn't there, But Podesta, her campaign manager, and many other top people from the campaign are on, and they're listening very, very carefully as Barbara and others are describing arguments why Clinton should recount should request a recount in several key states.
So candidates under American law have this ability. They can demand a recount, depending on the state, as long as they pay the requisite costs, but would Clinton do it? So there were a few concerns that the campaign brought up. The first one and the most aggravating to me is they wanted to know what evidence we had that the election had been hacked. Well, wait a minute.
That seems completely backwards. The purpose of a recount of any examination of the paper ballots is to gather evidence that the outcome was correct or not. Without looking at them, we don't have the evidence to begin with. All we can do is say that it would be possible for an attack to have changed the result without leaving any visible evidence. Another concern was how to pay for the recounts.
The cost was likely to rise to the 1,000,000 of dollars, But maybe most important and most aggravating was they were concerned about backpedaling from the concession about tiptoeing away from having conceded the victory to Donald Trump.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Since Hillary didn’t want to prove that Trump was right to not say he wouldn’t oppose the results, they had to come up with a plan b to request recounts. Enter Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate. https://t.co/eWnu4AlP2I
Video Transcript AI Summary
We tried to convince the Clinton team to do recounts, but it didn't work. Then, David Jefferson came up with a new idea. He realized that in many states, any candidate can request a recount. We found Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, who agreed to help. Jill has a history of supporting election integrity and had about 1% of the vote. Her willingness to assist was a crucial moment for our efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had a number of conversations trying to convince the Clinton people to move ahead with recounts, but it didn't seem like we were ever going to get there. But then we had a new idea, this time from David Jefferson, another election integrity advocate. His idea was his wonderful insight was that actually in many states, any candidate can request a recount. And although you might think we're a 2 party system in the US, there are third parties. In fact, we identified 1 third party, Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate, and Jill, we had a conversation with her culminating in a talk on the 22nd where She unbelievably was willing to help.
Jill has a long history of, being a champion of election integrity. She was on the ballot in most states. She ended up winning about 1% of the vote, not really all that much, but still enough, and most importantly, she was willing to help. This was an absolutely pivotal moment for the entire effort.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
We picked three states to target to recount, Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. In PA we had to sway or pay 27,000 people in order to get a recount. Seems illegal. https://t.co/gzvgARdcE8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the importance of three key states in the US election: Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. These states had a combined total of 46 electoral votes and played a crucial role in determining the outcome of the election. In Wisconsin, the margin was around 23,000 votes, and candidates could request a recount. Michigan had a smaller margin of about 11,000 votes, and candidates could pay a fee to request a recount in specific precincts. Pennsylvania had a larger margin of 44,000 votes, but the state predominantly used paperless voting machines, making the recount process more complicated. In Pennsylvania, three citizens from each precinct wanting a recount had to post a bond and swear to fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Projected to be won by Clinton. All 3 of them are won by Trump. They combined for 46, electoral votes. The electoral margin was 37 votes, I believe. All 3 had margins less than, 8 tenths of a percent.
And in total, the US election was possibly decided by the 78,000 votes in these 3 states, the 78,000, margin. And moreover, we had to find states where we could actually do something. Michigan and Wisconsin allowed candidates to petition for recounts. Pennsylvania requires a court order, but we thought our chances were pretty good. So in Wisconsin, to to start us off, the margin was, just under 23,000 votes.
That's about 0.7 0.8%. The technology there is almost entirely OPSAN, and every ballot that is cast in Wisconsin has a paper record. And as I mentioned, the law any candidate can demand a recount if he or she can pay the cost. And each county in Wisconsin decides how to do the recount. You can you can recount all the votes by hand counting all the paper, or you could just run the ballots back through a machine.
And so in Wisconsin, that decision is left up to the counties. In Michigan, the margin was much smaller. It's about 11,000 votes, 0.23%. And by the way, Michigan is also where we live, so it was sort of convenient. Can.
And, again, all votes use paper. And, the law states that any aggrieved candidate can file, can pay a statutory fee in every in however many precincts he or she wants to get a recount. And then the state board of canvassers, which is the state committee that kinda decides, that runs elections, decides how the recount will be done. And finally, in Pennsylvania, the margin was a bit bigger, 44,000 votes. Unfortunately, in Pennsylvania, they predominantly use paperless DREs.
So, 70% of their their votes are cast without any kind of paper record or backup at all. And the law there is very, very complicated. It says that, 3 citizens from every precinct that wants to be recounted must, post a bond, swear that there is fraud, and, you know, that's how you have to get a recount done in Pennsylvania. And, bear in mind, there are Tens of thousands of precincts in Pennsylvania. Not tens of thousands.
There are 9,000 or so precincts in Pennsylvania. So that's 27,000 people we need to to swear and pay
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump and Ricky Vaughn face the same charge of conspiracy against election rights. @theorangebeam claims 30,000 Michigan ballots were counted multiple times, suggesting fraud. They also allege that rescanning was used to steal Trump's lead.
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Trump got hit with the same charge as Ricky Vaughn - conspiracy against rights in an election Ricky was the test case
@theorangebeam - theorangebeam
@JackPosobiec Trump won, by a lot! She said at least 30,000 ballots in Michigan were counted multiple times. That's a lot of votes, and a lot of fraud! https://t.co/l7NFOVqWe1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Melissa Carone, a freelance IT worker contracted by Dominion Voting Systems, witnessed numerous city workers running batches of ballots through tabulators without discarding them first. The tabulating machines would jam frequently, and the correct process would be to remove the problem ballot and rescan the batch. However, instead of discarding the batch, they were rescanning it multiple times, resulting in counting the same ballots and votes 9 to 10 times. Carone estimated that at least 30,000 ballots were counted multiple times.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sure. My name is Melissa Carone. I was contracted to work, for Dominion Voting Systems. I was, I'm a freelance IT worker. I was contracted to work for Dominion to assist with IT during the election.
Speaker 1: And when you were working there, what, what did you observe?
Speaker 0: I observed, numerous employees, city workers, running batches of ballots through the tabulators countless times without discarding them first. The tabulating machines would jam 2 to 3 times an hour. When they would jam the correct process would be to pull out the problem ballot that jammed, say the problem ballot was number 24 out of 50. We would I would I wasn't allowed to touch any hardware at all. I would assist them, tell them to pull out this ballot, put the problem ballot on top.
In Michigan, our ballots, from the tabulators don't just drop into ballot steal ballot boxes. They are now as they got tabulated they are now on top of the tabulating machine. Okay? So instead of them taking these. So say let's keep it number 25 is the problem ballot.
It got jammed. So the computer would throw an error. It would say ballot number 25. There there is an error. I would say pull out ballot number 25.
Slowly pull it out, put it on top, take the, the ballots that had already been tabulated, which are on top of the tabulating machine now, put them all back in a stack, discard the entire batch, and rescan it. Instead of discarding, they were just rescanning, rescanning, rescanning, counting ballots 9 to 10 times, counting votes 9 to 10 times.
Speaker 1: So they were counting the same ballot, the same vote 9 or 10 times?
Speaker 0: Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: So how many ballots would you estimate in front of you that you observed were counted multiple times in the machine? Can you put a number to it, an estimated number? At least Best people.
Speaker 0: At least 30,000.
Speaker 1: At least 30,000. Okay.
@theorangebeam - theorangebeam
@JackPosobiec More: She said that they were just rescanning, and rescanning, and rescanning. That's how much it took to steal President Donald Trump's legitimate lead. https://t.co/ZVa5nCRb6T
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that when a ballot jams in the tabulating machines, an error message appears with the options to discard or recount. However, instead of following the correct procedure of discarding the entire batch and rescanning the already tabulated ones, they were repeatedly rescanning the jammed ballots without discarding them. This led to the ballots being counted 8 to 10 times, indicating a lack of understanding and confusion among the individuals involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sorry. So the tabulating machines, when, a ballot jams, it puts up an error. It'll say discard or recount. So when it puts up that error, when a jam occurs, the correct way to go about it is to discard the whole batch, take the ones that have already been tabulated, put them back in a pile, put the one that jams on top, and then discard it. Discard the whole thing, and then rescan they were not discarding.
So they were just rescanning, rescanning, rescanning, counting ballots 8 to 10 times, just recounting them. They had absolutely no idea what they were doing.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
When will Hillary Clinton be charged with "election interference"? https://t.co/lKS6ndsTIw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Clinton plan intelligence referred to information received around the same time as the Australian intelligence. It suggested that one of Mrs. Clinton's foreign policy advisers had a plan to link Donald Trump to the Russians. On August 3, 2016, Director Brennan briefed President Obama, Vice President Biden, Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and the Attorney General about this intelligence. Director Comey was present during the briefing. However, this information was not provided to the agents working on the case or to the secret FISA Court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jordan referenced the Clinton plan intelligence. Exactly what was the Clinton plan?
Speaker 1: Based on declassified documents in the in the public record, there was intelligence information that, was received, at virtually the same time that the information came from, from the Australians, I mean, within a day or two. That intelligence in included information that there was a, purported plan, designed by, one of missus Clinton's foreign policy advisers, to create a scandal tying Donald Trump, to the Russians. That's the essence of the intelligence as contained in the, declassified information.
Speaker 0: Did the president receive this intelligence?
Speaker 1: On August 3, 2016, then director Brennan had briefed the president, vice president, director of national intelligence, the FBI, the attorney general, and others.
Speaker 0: When you say the FBI, you mean mister Comey?
Speaker 1: They had on August 3rd, it was, conducted at the White House. It was director Comey himself.
Speaker 0: So mister Comey knew about this. President Obama knew about this. Vice President Biden knew about this. But, it wasn't provided to the agents, on the case or or provided to the secret FISA Court. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: That's correct.
@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84
There ya have it, folks. Millionaire funding the protests. Over 20 million. Why isn't this illegal? https://t.co/2xk2q1IneZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tech entrepreneur Neville Royceingham and his wife Jody Evans have reportedly funneled over $20 million to the pro-Palestinian group called the People's Forum since 2017. The People's Forum, based in Manhattan, has organized several rallies, including a recent one in Washington DC and another in Times Square. The couple has been associated with social justice and Marxist movements, with the New York Times linking Neville to nonprofits promoting Chinese propaganda. Although Neville denies ties to the Chinese Communist Party, he reportedly lives in Shanghai. In a YouTube video, Jody praised China's political system. The People's Forum, co-organizing another rally called "shut it down for Palestine," has not responded to inquiries about their connection to the couple.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Behind at least 4 massive pro Palestinian rallies here in New York City and DC leads back to this couple. Now the free press reporting tech entrepreneur Neville Royceingham and his wife Jody Evans funneled more than 20,000,000 to a group called the People's Forum starting in 2017. The People's Forum headquartered in Manhattan has pro Palestinian signs blustered everywhere. The group proclaiming to advocate for marginalized communities. The People's Forum with other social justice groups organized this November 4th protest in Washington DC and this rally, thousands flooding Times Square back on October 8th.
The free press reporting the deep pocketed couple have long been tied to social justice or Marxist movements. A New York Times investigation for linking the tech entrepreneur to at least 4 nonprofits peddling Chinese propaganda. Now denies any ties to the Chinese Communist Party, but reportedly lives in Shanghai. This past June, his wife had nothing but praise for China and its political system in this YouTube video.
Speaker 1: It's like the idea that it's reports that controls everything is like so crazy. What a crazy notion, that we've been sold.
Speaker 0: Now we've repeatedly reached out to the People's Forum about their ties to this couple but have not heard back. The People's Forum is co organizing another rally to be held this Friday called shut it down for Palestine. Martha.
Speaker 1: Alright.
@ShotGun_Bonnie - ShotGunBonnie
17, 327 dead people voted in the Michigan 2020 presidential election. But nothing to see here folks .. let’s just keep prosecuting people who question the legitimacy of our elections. https://t.co/SgLITSQS2M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Using open source data, Eric Lutzen discovered that 17,327 Michigan voters above the age of 80, who were registered and voted, also had corresponding obituaries. Although I don't have the complete obituary data, I can provide you with the website containing the tabular data, which spans around 350 pages. If you have any specific questions about our findings, feel free to ask. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a nutshell, we found several other things using open source data. There is a gentleman named Eric Lutzen, and he has matched up a list. He started looking at voters above the age of 80 that were registered for voting and did vote on in Michigan. And 17,327 Michigan voters also had a corresponding obituary, and I didn't print that whole thing out, but I can give you that website for the tabular data, and it's about 3 50 pages or so. So in the essence of time, I'll close it out.
We'll be happy to chat if there's any other specific information that I can provide to you about our findings. Sure. Thank you.
@TheEXECUTlONER_ - 👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈
Hillary showing her ties with George Soros. Hard to find video, been deleted from the internet. George Soros -“ It’s time I become really involved in the electoral process.” You don’t say? Share it everywhere. https://t.co/E2DvNh7kvW
Video Transcript AI Summary
George Soros is praised for his fearlessness and willingness to take action when our country needs it. The speaker urges everyone to welcome Soros and acknowledges that they personally feel the need to become more involved in the electoral process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In time, our country needs us, and we need people like George Soros who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts. So please join me in welcoming George Soros. It is the first time that I I feel that I need to stand up and to do something really, I think, and become really engaged, in the electoral process in in this
@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84
Say what? Just like we said...stolen election. I'm pretty confident that it will be overturned. https://t.co/zWkkpjwmU5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights statistical irregularities in the election results, pointing out multiple batches where Biden received all the votes and Trump received none. They assert that this is a statistical impossibility and challenge the media to stop denying the evidence of election fraud. The speaker emphasizes that the incorrect information has been publicly available for months and urges the Secretary of State to acknowledge it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 100, Trump, nothing. Batch 3, Biden, 100. Trump, nothing. Batch 4, Biden, 99. Trump, 0.
These are statistical impossibility. Everyone would know that. Another, group of batches. Biden 100, Trump 0. Biden 100, Trump 0.
Biden 150, Trump 0. Biden 200, Trump 0. Secretary of state has to know that this information was incorrect. It's been there for months ever since this audit data has been released. It's public data.
And, I challenge everyone out there, particularly the media, Stop telling us there is no evidence of election fraud. You're lying. There is evidence of Action or fraud. And anyone in the country that says it does not is lying to you. It's time for the people in this
@ICU1010 - Eddie
@HillaryClinton Here are 20+ minutes of Democrats denying and questioning election results. Hillary Clinton, Obama, Biden, et al., with many calling President Trump illegitimate. The 2020 election was rigged, and Biden is illegitimate!! https://t.co/wu8Bt5WVgO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss their belief that various elections, including the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, were stolen or illegitimate due to factors such as Russian interference, voter suppression, and faulty voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the electoral process and call for reforms to ensure fair elections. The video also mentions specific instances, such as the 2000 presidential election and the Georgia gubernatorial race, where the speakers believe the election results were not accurate. Overall, the speakers emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in elections to protect democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you.
Speaker 1: How can you win with Russian interference, though?
Speaker 2: That's what real scared about it in 2020. But rightly.
Speaker 1: Because I'm thinking illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020?
Speaker 2: You are absolutely right.
Speaker 0: He is an illegitimate president in my mind
Speaker 3: Could you be my vice president to a candidate?
Speaker 4: Folks, look. I absolutely agree.
Speaker 5: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2 16. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered.
Speaker 6: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania knew they were successful.
Speaker 0: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 7: The president or elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate.
Speaker 8: I don't see
Speaker 9: this. President-elect as a legitimate president. You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the auction.
Speaker 2: I do. We have a president who, if in fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact not be a legitimate president.
Speaker 0: The one thing that Trump It's fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually Was.
Speaker 10: I have an objection.
Speaker 11: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina.
Speaker 12: I object because people are horrified.
Speaker 0: He's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 13: Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts.
Speaker 6: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud out of illegitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, election. The fake news industry interfered with his election.
Speaker 0: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers.
Speaker 2: Do you believe Trump is illegitimate president?
Speaker 14: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference.
Speaker 15: There absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy.
Speaker 16: So that legitimacy is in question. Yes.
Speaker 7: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate.
Speaker 2: Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to prove that he beat you.
Speaker 0: Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 13: Stolen emails. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Own an election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump.
Speaker 9: Did you believe president Trump is an illegitimate president?
Speaker 5: Based on what I just said, which I can't retract.
Speaker 13: Okay. He tweeted in Tory, 2018, quote, the more we learn about the 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office.
Speaker 7: In the Russian attempt to to have the election. And, frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it Makes this election illegitimate.
Speaker 0: There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover. But you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, woah.
Something's not right here.
Speaker 6: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 14: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, you know, to what degree, if any, the campaign was actually in collusion with the with with Russia.
Speaker 0: He knows he's an illegitimate president. So, of course, he's obsessed with me, and I believe that it's a guilty conscience.
Speaker 4: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole my presidential election.
Speaker 3: If Al Gore won that election, think he won anyway.
Speaker 4: Actually, I think I carried Florida.
Speaker 5: Al Gore won the election nationwide and also in Florida, but the supreme court ruled the other way. Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected 5 to 4.
Speaker 0: Bush versus Gore. A court took away A presidency.
Speaker 17: If all the votes were carried in Florida, that Al Gore would be president today and George Bush would be backing off.
Speaker 2: I come from Florida Where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'etat.
Speaker 13: It's in 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was the one who was elected president, and he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision.
Speaker 4: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, the older Americans, the African Americans, the Haitian Americans denied the right to vote and have those votes counted.
Speaker 18: I do believe that the projections were right in the first place at 7 o'clock when they called it Boy.
Speaker 2: Let me tell you something without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida, and it was not closed.
Speaker 8: There's no question You won the state of Florida.
Speaker 4: Oh, thank you, darling. No. That's a question.
Speaker 17: That's a question.
Speaker 4: We will never know because votes weren't weren't counted. But by And
Speaker 13: and then in your judgment
Speaker 4: I mean, that's unfortunate. Yeah. And there is no other way of saying it, but to be very blunt, Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never forget it.
Speaker 19: Most Americans are great. Many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair.
Speaker 18: But I don't believe we lost. I I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted. The Coach counted The
Speaker 14: Supreme Court elected president of 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency.
Speaker 20: We know we won this election. They know we won on this election, and Americans know we won this election.
Speaker 18: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of those votes been found in Florida, I think Al Gore would be president today.
Speaker 21: We had more votes. We won, and we are never Going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United States again.
Speaker 14: You should
Speaker 12: know by now based the fact that he lost the popular vote vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, and we don't know how many he lost by in Florida.
Speaker 5: There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president.
Speaker 12: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral Folks.
Speaker 17: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election.
Speaker 4: I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, Delivery fraud and an attempt to The chairman must remain on. Enron had already helped the Bush team with such favors as ferrying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt the counting of legally cast ballots.
Speaker 11: It is signed by myself behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count to The court, not
Speaker 16: the week
Speaker 12: with the United States, the Friday of this election.
Speaker 2: Speaking to a Democratic
Speaker 22: group in Chicago Tuesday, he
Speaker 2: made it clear He thinks Al Gore was the winner.
Speaker 16: By the time it was over,
Speaker 5: our candidate had won the popular vote, and the only way they could win the election was to stop The voting in Florida.
Speaker 17: Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker, and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered
Speaker 4: with the results. Al Gore would be president.
Speaker 23: I think that the issue before us today, is Not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election. That issue has been settled, not to my belief, but it has been settled.
Speaker 13: Let's just drop the vice. President, presidentor. That's all I got.
Speaker 9: Al Gore should
Speaker 13: have been president of the United States.
Speaker 24: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be the only appointed president in the history of these United States.
Speaker 13: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections.
Speaker 19: In 2000, unions turned out 25% of the vote, and Al Gore won.
Speaker 17: But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large start. The Supreme Court stopped the counting of the votes, and if they'd let the council on, El Gore would have got the necessary vote.
Speaker 2: The Supreme Court selected George w Bush as the president. He was not elected.
Speaker 12: There is overwhelming But it said Joyce w Bush did not win this election.
Speaker 25: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted.
Speaker 5: Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000, I guess, our goal because I I think that he probably lost Florida and also that nationwide.
Speaker 17: If you invite me back on this show in about 8 weeks, I think you're gonna learn that El Goran actually did get all the votes there.
Speaker 26: I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in 1 one state without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many Tricks were full of various kinds.
Speaker 18: The vice president did win, but, and I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to Polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well.
Speaker 19: The has been
Speaker 10: thwarting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a 5 four vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its first court appointed president.
Speaker 13: And stolen.
Speaker 27: Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office.
Speaker 25: That election was stolen from the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election.
Speaker 17: I think in 2000, everybody So, well, he did win the election out of court.
Speaker 15: He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't actually won.
Speaker 2: What happened in Florida will go down in history as a coup d'etat.
Speaker 16: Did we conclude, is it possible that There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone so wrong one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It's not possible there was a conspiracy. It was very well organized.
Why were the state police out there on that day, election day, taking license plates, And and so forth. You know, how did all these things happen in one state at one time in one election? Is is it possible that we are Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it. Not sure wish, Gore was president right now. He should be.
Speaker 17: Well, yes, he got elected.
Speaker 16: Oh, well, good.
Speaker 28: A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens of thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed out in the 2000 presidential election.
Speaker 17: 5 supreme court justices, This is Trump the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be recounted so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state
Speaker 2: And won the election.
Speaker 23: We had the election stolen from us, and you must admit that. They stole it, and we need a leader to help us get revenge.
Speaker 13: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election.
Speaker 26: They usurped the The powers of the forest being caught and and and intervene, it was a fix as far as we're concerned. You know? It it there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in.
Speaker 2: After the when you stole the election, you came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not going to get over it.
Speaker 4: You know it. I know know it. They know it. We won that election.
Speaker 22: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and now functioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts, have led to additional loss of confidence by the public.
Speaker 6: The right to vote
Speaker 4: has been stolen from qualified voters.
Speaker 13: The New Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged of the voting machines.
Speaker 12: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted.
Speaker 5: The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems.
Speaker 29: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all.
Speaker 30: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations Suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I join with my colleagues in objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes.
Speaker 31: Nas in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, counted.
Speaker 32: This last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at Fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen.
Speaker 2: The wife of John Kerry said she has Lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of loading machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. There were numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of rejections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines.
Speaker 0: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity
Speaker 22: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our elections.
Speaker 8: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of what I'll call honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or a dishonest employee of a local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics and has Computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in a secret instruction to disregard every 20th democratic voter at 10 percent to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever, you might not even know it.
Speaker 4: I agree with tens of millions of Americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on
Speaker 33: an electronic voting machine that there is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities That occurred with the electronic voting machines in Ohio on November 2nd last year point to an unresolved of national crisis.
Speaker 11: We cannot declare that the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing the voting machines used in
Speaker 0: Ohio. I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, And the machines were not reliable.
Speaker 22: The members of congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process.
Speaker 31: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our unless we registered our own protest against the obviously flawed voting process that took place in so many of our states.
Speaker 34: Voters who wish to cast a vote Vote for president or vice president can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be Counting.
Speaker 27: One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states was the lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines.
Speaker 19: In 2004, they caused Democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their Ballot. They turn the Department of Civil Rights and the Justice Department into the voter suppression division with voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing.
Speaker 2: Now you have one very affirmative statement to make.
Speaker 23: We won.
Speaker 2: But I didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because how they cheated. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have We were robbed of an election. Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia.
Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida.
Speaker 29: Using the word rigged, Using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020?
Speaker 2: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response to what I believe Well, it's stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the door.
Speaker 29: Back to the
Speaker 2: outside asking if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no.
Speaker 0: If she had a fair election, she already would have won.
Speaker 2: This is not a speech of concession. Because concession needs to acknowledge an action that's Right, true, or prop. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not right. You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today?
Absolutely.
Speaker 5: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it. It's clear. It's clear.
Speaker 2: It was not a free and fair election. I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters.
Speaker 25: So I think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her.
Speaker 2: The election was not fair. The process was not Fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots, and they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020, if we don't do this right.
Speaker 29: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee, if they They actually I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states. Should they concede?
Speaker 2: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believe it could be a failure, And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably
Speaker 4: She would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchise 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the vote away.
Speaker 2: We've been raised to believe that it is in that respect to
Speaker 16: call
Speaker 35: You, notably did not concede.
Speaker 2: I did not.
Speaker 35: Okay. You acknowledged That he won, but you did not concede. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression?
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 13: Reminder, she wrote, Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams.
Speaker 2: I said that the election was stolen from Georgia voters. The Process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention to the deep and real concerns of those Who watched this election be stolen in the state of Georgia? It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes counted. They were not allowed to cast votes.
They had their votes Scarded.
Speaker 36: It certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. She probably won.
Speaker 2: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it either was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system fair.
Concession in the political space is an acknowledgment that the process was fair, and I don't believe that to be so. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and right, and I cannot say that. If I tend to say I didn't lose, I just didn't win. And I don't call it a loss. I just didn't win.
Right. Right. Yes. You did. Okay.
Officially. Yes. Eventually. Put it this way. I didn't get to get inaugurated, and that's possible.
Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters, I will not say that.
Speaker 0: Candidates, both black and white, lost their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest Example is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now.
Speaker 2: I was joking with Beth backstage when Cliff said, you know, she lost. I'm like, no. I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia but for the malfeasance and the mismanagement It's Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved.
Speaker 9: Is he the legitimate governor elect him towards me.
Speaker 2: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes But that's not from the governor.
Speaker 9: With all with all due respect, and I respect where you're coming from, and I respect The the issues that you're raising, you're not answering the question. Do you think it was
Speaker 2: Wait a minute. No. I what I'm talking to you
Speaker 9: You're not using the word legitimate. Is he the legitimate governor Like, Georgia.
Speaker 2: He is the legal governor of Georgia. See, I'm here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. They said to me that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes.
So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because because we will never know which votes didn't count. This was not fair. It was not right, and it is deeply improper that Someone could ascend to that role having performed so basely and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent.
The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair
Speaker 8: and square?
Speaker 2: I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state, And that is we won.
Speaker 3: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit. It's the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a direct proportion of us not being able to get These these reforms passed.
Speaker 0: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential Election.
Speaker 25: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past, sometimes Democrats have to. You know, whenever people are in power, They're you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat
Getting paid $55,000 for 5,000 BIDEN votes!!👇🏻 But there’s NO PROOF of election fraud!! Is it me or is that pretty damn good proof? https://t.co/VD96AS7nn8
Video Transcript AI Summary
She was asked how many votes she could deliver for Biden and said at least 5,000 for $55,000. She stated she needs cash upfront and won't do it for free. She mentioned getting the Biden vote out and not worrying if they don't pay her. The cost per vote was mentioned as $5 to $8.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's what she had to say. We need the competition to get votes for Biden. How many votes you think you can deliver for us? At least 5,000. And what are we looking at as far as how much that's gonna cost?
Speaker 1: For the entire team that I'm looking at, I'm looking at 55,000.
Speaker 0: So 55,000. So 5,000 is
Speaker 1: the most comprehensive eager item? If not more, I'm not I'm not gonna overpromise because remember, we we're we're 16 days till election day. You you give me cash. You can do whatever
Speaker 0: you wanna do. $55,000 upfront. $5,000.
Speaker 1: That's right. Cash. Cash. Yeah. I'm getting the Biden the Biden vote out, but, I mean, I'm not gonna do it for free.
In other words, if they don't pay me, I'm like, excuse me. I don't that's another worry I don't have to worry about.
Speaker 2: You said it was, like, 5 or $8 with per vote. How How many votes? How many of which we look
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
In 2022, Hillary Clinton quietly settled a campaign finance violation over reporting the *Steele Dossier* funding as ‘legal services’ She paid a fine and was never arrested The same thing Trump is on trial for right now https://t.co/Uo8KIwo1l5
reSee.it AI Summary
Hillary Clinton is trending as a leading DNC presidential candidate, prompting a reflection on past controversies. There's a strong sentiment that she and Bill Clinton misappropriated funds raised for Haiti after the 2010 earthquake, with claims that less than 2% of the money reached those in need. A Haitian reporter urges Donald Trump to hold her accountable and calls for a public audit of the funds, suggesting that the Haitian community would support him in this effort.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
With Hillary Clinton Trending As The Leading DNC Presidential Candidate Lets Look Back At This Hillary Clinton “Stole Billions” & They Beg For Donald Trump To Hold Her Accountable 2016 Haitian Reporter “"Where is the money Hillary Clinton raised with the Clinton foundation, Haiti did not get even %2” — “The Whole World Has Given Billions” & They Accuse Bill Clinton & Hillary Clinton Of Stealing It “So, mister Trump, we are asking you, begging you, the Haitian community will side with you if one day you ask Hillary Clinton publicly to disclose the audit of all the money they have stolen from Haiti in 2010 after the earthquake”
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2010, after the Haiti earthquake, the Clinton Foundation received $1 billion but less than 2% went to Haiti. The Haitian community asks Trump to request Hillary Clinton to disclose the audit of the funds taken from Haiti. They believe in Trump's support and ask for transparency. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2010, the earthquake of Haiti, not only American taxpayers, but the whole world has given 1,000,000,000 of dollars to the Clinton Foundation for the Haitians. Not only not even 2% of that money went back to Haiti. So, mister Trump, we are asking you, telling you, the Haitian community will side with you if one day you ask Hillary Clinton publicly to disclose the audit of all the money they have stolen from Haiti in 2010 after the earthquake. Haiti is a very poor country. Haiti need defenders.
You said you will champion our cause. We welcome you, sir, and we we will work with you. And, please, publicly, Hillary Clinton, during your next debate to publish the audit of all the money they have stolen from Haiti. Thank you, sir. Thank
@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga
I’m told Harris campaign is already using ActBlue money laundering scheme, $20 million from Johann Georg Wyss known as Hansjörg Wyss, born 19 September 1935, a Swiss billionaire, and was broken down into over 1,600,000 donations across 400,000 donors. Dirty! Dirty! Dirty! https://t.co/pHaJr3lzwC
@stclairashley - Ashley St. Clair
“Just admit you hijacked democracy. Just admit you hate Trump so much you’re willing to trample on democracy and steal the vote from the people in the Democrat party.” 🔥🔥🔥 from @stoolpresidente https://t.co/H6nyoNtXLR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala was chosen by elites to run for president, despite receiving zero votes in 2020. The speaker criticizes the Democratic Party for hijacking democracy to defeat Trump, calling it the lowest point in their lifetime. They challenge critics to explain their stance but are met with silence. The speaker demands honesty about sacrificing democracy to win.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, Kamala, news flash, ran for president in 2020. You know how many votes she got? 0. 0. She was so disliked and such a bad candidate.
She didn't make it to the 1st fucking primary. And I guess she's never gonna have to get a real vote because she's been handpicked on purpose by the people who have been running Joe for the last 2 or 3 years. Now they're gonna try to run her and trot her out. It's disgusting. It's a hijacking democracy.
They knew Joe wasn't fit before and they waited. Fine. All that, fine. Take it with a grain of salt. For the Democrats, like a Rob Reiner.
This is the tweet I saw Rob Reiner that just sent me off. Democracy is saved. Kamala's running. And all these people now, Kamala AOC, you just said it was a cool 3 days ago, AOC. Now Kamala Kamala.
The Democrats and the left, the way they shit on our face and tell us it's 80 and sunny is so infuriating. Just admit you hijacked democracy. Just admit you don't care if fucking Mussolini or a head of lettuce who's running against Trump. You hate him so much, you're willing to trample on democracy, steal the vote from the American public, the most supposedly important right an American has, the right to vote. You have stolen it from the Democratic Party.
You have said you don't get to choose who runs for president. We do. A group of elite small people are gonna handpick and shove down your throat who you vote for. Just admit that. But this democracy is democracy is saved and America is saved.
It's the lowest point for democracy in my lifetime. Just say you hate fucking Trump so much, you're willing to do whatever it takes to beat Trump, and it doesn't matter what rights you steal, stomp on, or whatever you're willing to do. If you say that, at least I'll have an ounce of respect. But this democracy is safe when you've absolutely done the worst thing for democracy. It's like we're a third world country now, the way this thing's being run.
Just say that and at least I can have an ounce of respect. And for all the people who are being, Dave, you're dangerous. Dave, shut up. Dave, what are you talking about? Stick to pizza.
Stick to ports. You know, not what one person who has sent me a message or tried to explain, know not what one of them has done, explained how I'm wrong about anything. They're just like, shut up. Shut up. Shut up.
If one person can explain how anything I've said is wrong, I'll fucking
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling for action! There’s evidence that ActBlue is being used to launder money for campaigns, which explains how Harris raised $100 million in under 36 hours. Carl Higbie's segment on irregular FEC donations backs this up. What will the GOP do with the election just three months away?
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Make it go viral! They are using ActBlue to launder money to their preferred campaigns. This explains how Harris raised $100 million in less than 36 hours. Carl Higbie just did a segment on irregular FEC donations, which corroborates his report. The question is, what is the @GOP going to do about it since we are three months away from the presidential election?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris raised suspiciously large amounts of money in a short time, sparking concerns about fraudulent donations. An investigation revealed potential money laundering through ActBlue, a democratic fundraising platform. Ordinary citizens' names and addresses were used for large donations they did not make. The source of the money remains unclear, but past reports suggest further scrutiny is needed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can't be the only person who's disturbed by these figures and how much money she's raised in one day or who also doesn't believe them.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Did Kamala Harris actually raise $81,000,000 in twenty 4 hours and over a $100,000,000 in 36 hours, mostly from small dollar donors according to democratic fundraising platform, Act Blue. I mean, those numbers would be astronomical for anyone, let alone a candidate who received a whopping 844 votes in the 2020 Democratic primary. So I can understand why people are a little sus about those numbers. And looking into this, things are about to get real murky, and I am not sure if people are gonna like what I found.
So I'm citing a 2023 article in the Carolina Journal. Investigation indicates AppBlue potentially laundered fraudulent political donations. An investigative journalist from North Carolina, Stephen Horn, has made a significant discovery in the Federal Election Commission database, revealing a scheme to potentially launder fraudulent political donations through left wing organizations, including ActBlue. Remember, ActBlue is the primary democratic fundraising platform online. Alright.
So Horn and 2 other volunteers, Kelly Lane and Steve, unearthed evidence of 2 Raleigh residents whose names and addresses were employed to record substantial amounts of money donated to democratic organizations. And just so everybody's aware, platforms like AppBlue are required to disclose political contributions to the FEC, including who made the donation, when they made it, their address and the amount of the donation. Look at this data. This is so bizarre. One donor, same day, just dozens of contributions.
By the way, this is all public information. So you can go to the FEC website, do a search, see what you find. Alright. The article goes on. However, a perplexing twist emerged when both individuals in factly stated their inability to contribute such exorbitant sums.
Speaker 0: There was a flurry of donations made
Speaker 2: in your name, about 20 donations.
Speaker 0: Have you ever donated to Act Blue? Yeah. Okay. Okay. These donations made.
Do they look familiar to you at all? Not necessarily. Yeah. So you can see there's a bunch of $100 donations in your name, with this address. Oh, my lord.
Jeez Louise. I did not make a flurry of, you know One would remember that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. You can't watch that and tell me something fishy is not going on. The result of these investigations suggest that the AppBlue fundraising platform is being used to launder fraudulent political donations using the names and addresses of ordinary citizens. If the individual whose name and address is on a contribution did not in fact make that contribution, it seems likely that the money is coming from a source which would not be legally able to make the contribution directly.
That is wild. Now to be clear, I'm not saying that's what's going on right now because we don't have a data for that. The FTC website is only updated, or the disclosure only happens on a monthly basis. But what I am saying is that based on past reporting, I should probably ask a few more questions as to where the 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars actually came from, or maybe it's just nothing.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
You don't need to wait until November to know that the Democrats are cheat*ing in the 2024 election. They are already cheating. Right now. Through campaign finance fra*d. This will blow your mind 🤯 https://t.co/Hcao20vf5O
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video reveals suspicious donation patterns on fec.gov, with unemployed individuals making numerous small donations totaling tens of thousands of dollars to ActBlue and various Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with the Harris campaign sending emails asking for $1 donations using fear tactics. Fake donors were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing the campaign's desperation for small donations to potentially facilitate a larger scam.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In just 10 minutes on fec.gov, they discovered startling donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Now let's take a look at some of these numbers. 4 unemployed individuals donating a staggering $197,993.68 across you ready for this? 23,416 separate donations. That's an average of 10 donations per day every day since January 1, 2023.
Does this sound like genuine grassroots support to you? So let's break it down. These suspicious donations. 1st, we have Carolyn from New Jersey living in an apartment and listed as unemployed. She somehow managed to donate 53,000 over $53,000 through 598 I'm sorry.
5,000 998 separate donations since January 1st 23. The bulk of the donations, 36,000, went directly to ActBlue across over 4,600 transactions. But it doesn't stop there. She also made donations to various Democrat campaigns and PACs including Bob Casey for Senate, Jeffries for Congress, and Nancy Pelosi for Congress. So how does an unemployed person living in an apartment have this kind of money to throw around?
Next, we have Sandra from California. Also, unemployed and living in an average house. She donated $30,000 or just over 30,000 dollars. Ready for this? Across 66,000 almost 6800 donations.
Again, the majority went to ActBlue. Just over $19,000 over 4,870 donations. She also contributed to Rosen for Nevada, HMP, and even Harris for president. That's right folks. Direct donations to Harris' campaign from an unemployed individual.
Then there is Thomas from Wisconsin. His listed address is just a plot of land, yet this unemployed donor managed to give, you ready for this? Just shy of $70,000 through 26 100 donations. A whopping 34, almost 35,000 went to ActBlue in 1600 separate transactions. He also donated to the progressive turnout project, retired Americans pack, and once again, Harris for president.
And then we also have here this is Amy. Meet Amy from Oregon, another unemployed donor who somehow scraped together $42,000 for about 8,000 donations that ActBlue received. Okay? Now they received 29,000 from her across 55100 transactions. She donated to Ameripac, moms fed up, elect democratic women.
Now my friends, these patterns are not just suspicious. They are downright alarming. So how are unemployed individuals making 1,000 of small donations totaling tens of 1,000 of dollars? And why are they spreading these donations across multiple Democrat campaigns and PACs? But it gets worse.
Tony Saruga, another investigator, he found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in just 30 days. Now take a look at some of the emails that were sent by the Harris campaign. They're practically begging for $1, $2, $3 donations, but there's a twist that reveals just how deep the rabbit hole goes. You ready? In this email, you can see right here, They're pushing hard for a measly $3 donation.
They claim it could guarantee Joe and Kamala are reelected and prevent Donald Trump from becoming president again. Yeah. Well here's another one. This time they are down to asking for just a dollar, $1. They're using scare tactics mentioning Trump's far right billionaire donors and a supposed $50,000,000 donation to Trump's Super PAC.
It's clear fear mongering 101. But this last email is where things get really interesting. If you notice the name at the top, f j b. Now you might think that's just a random set of initials, but here's the kicker. The investigators deliberately seeded these initials intact, Blue's database.
That's right, America. Tony Saruga and his team inserted tens of thousands of fake donors into ActBlue lists to track their activities and lo and behold, here's one of the fake names showing up in an official email. This proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the Harris Campaign is using these ActBlue lists for their fundraising efforts. They're sending personalized emails to names that don't even exist. But why are they so desperate for these tiny donations?
It's not about the money folks, it's about creating ActBlue accounts to facilitate what appears to be a massive scam. They're using these small donations to create a smokescreen of grassroots support all while potentially funneling much larger sums through these seemingly innocent transactions. This isn't just clever market.
@JasonMiyaresVA - Jason Miyares
🚨🚨 Breaking: I sent this letter to ActBlue demanding answers. The integrity of our election is at stake. https://t.co/0gUhtmQlYY
@pjcolbeck - Patrick Colbeck✝️
7 courts found @jocelynbenson in violation of the law yet she gets on a national platform to lecture us on election integrity...aye caramba. https://t.co/3QE3ugQFFg
@justuscoakley - jack coakley
1/2 ... Illegal money-laundering -- 2020 election. https://capitalresearch.org/article/report-how-charities-secretly-help-win-elections/
REPORT: How Charities Secretly Help Win Elections
America's Investigative Think Tank
capitalresearch.org
@ValentinaForUSA - Valentina Gomez
I uncovered voter fraud. The steal has begun. I hope it’s too big to rig. https://t.co/EDSvCiZ2ou
Video Transcript AI Summary
Multiple individuals have allegedly registered to vote illegally using the speaker's home address. The speaker believes this constitutes election fraud in a crucial election. Missouri Republicans are accused of inaction regarding election integrity, implying corruption. The speaker claims Republicans had ample time to eliminate corrupt voting machines and prevent election cheating but failed to do so. Despite this, the speaker hopes the election's scale will prevent rigging.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They are trying to steal the election again, and here's the proof. Somehow, multiple people have illegally registered to vote using my home address for the most important election of our lifetime. These clowns in Missouri don't have the balls to actually do something about it or ensure a free and fair election because, to be honest, they're all bought and paid for. These so called Republicans had 4 years to get rid of the corrupt voting machines and to make it impossible for anyone to cheat in our elections. I genuinely hope it's too big to rig because election fraud is officially underway.
@MasalaFry69 - Methi 🇵🇸 🇵🇸
"facing down the powerful, corrupt forces of the system" What a load of BS. She's participating in the system. She's complicit in it. If she was really anti the system she would be campaigning for people to stop voting for it. 💩💩💩💩
@peterdaou - Peter Daou
RESPECT TO JILL STEIN ✊🏽 @DrJillStein could have had a comfortable career as a Harvard-trained doctor. Instead she's devoted her life to facing down the powerful, corrupt forces of the system, at immense personal risk. History will be kind to her. I'm honored to know her.
@DigitalGal_ - 🌸 Digi Gal
Remember in 2016 when a reporter in Haiti said “Where is the money Hillary Clinton raised with the Clinton foundation, Haiti didn’t get even 2%” where did the money go? USAID funded the Clinton foundation and also to her daughter Chelsea Clinton https://t.co/0iTunNpzc1
@RandPaul - Rand Paul
Hillary, Obama, and the Democrats clearly used the apparatus of government to delegitimize an election and harm Donald Trump. This should be fully investigated, and those responsible should be punished. Thanks to @DNIGabbard for bringing more of this to light.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
2016 Haitian Reporter “"Where is the money Hillary Clinton raised with the Clinton foundation, Haiti did not get even 2%” “The whole world has given billions” Bill Clinton & Hillary Clinton stole it https://t.co/Ku8LyvTR7h
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the February 2010 Haiti earthquake, billions of dollars from around the world, including to the Cleveland Foundation for Haitians, were donated. The speaker notes that Haiti is a very poor country and needs defenders, and says, “You said you will champion our cause. We welcome you, and we will work with you.” They then urge Hillary Clinton, during her next debate, to publish the audit of all the money they have stolen from Haiti.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 02/2010, the earthquake of Haiti, not only American taxpayers, but the whole world has given billions of dollars to the Cleveland Foundation for the Haitian Haitians, not only community will Haiti is a very poor country. Haiti need defenders. You said you will champion our cause. We welcome you, sir. And we we will work with you.
But please ask publicly Hillary Clinton. During your next debate. To publish the audit of all the money they have stolen from Haiti. Thank you, sir. Thank