TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

print3_d
Posted - January 19, 2023 at 8:47 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pierre Poilievre's alleged connection to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and support for their agenda is questioned in a series of posts. The posts highlight his hiring of WEF-affiliated individuals, failure to remove WEF members from positions, and support from former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Additionally, his stance on issues such as mass immigration and vaccines, which align with WEF goals, is scrutinized. The posts also mention his support for the Ukrainian government.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

1 / 11 @PierrePoilievre is a arm of the WEF who supports the WEF Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's) He like Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh all are on the same team. I will prove these fact on this meme in this 11 Part thread. Scroll down to read.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

2 / 11 If Pierre isn't part of the WEF why did he hire this WEF guy for his leadership race co-chair? 1-https://www.weforum.org/people/john-baird 2-https://web.archive.org/web/20220415002129/https://www.pierre4pm.ca/team 3-https://www.eurasiagroup.net/people/JBaird 4-https://www.eurasiagroup.net/people/gbutts

World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
Endorsements Join me in making Canada the freest nation on earth web.archive.org
Eurasia Group | John Baird eurasiagroup.net
Eurasia Group | Gerald Michael Butts eurasiagroup.net

@print3_d - PRINT3D

3 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why doesnt he fire WEF Michelle Rempel Garner. She said to Trudeau " enough with the woke sh1t" yet she defends drag shows for kids. 1-https://www.weforum.org/people/michelle-rempel-garner 2-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7BxDcpFdjc 3-https://theparadise.ng/supposedly-anti-woke-mp-michelle-rempel-attacks-parents-protesting-all-ages-drag-show/

World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
Page not found | The Paradise News theparadise.ng

@print3_d - PRINT3D

4/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why would he actually appoint Tony Clement a WEF member to the board of conservative fund for the CPC? Doesn't make much sense does it? 1-https://ottawa.citynews.ca/national-news/former-tory-mp-tony-clement-appointed-to-board-of-conservative-fund-sources-582692 2-https://www.weforum.org/people/tony-clement

Former Tory MP Tony Clement appointed to board of Conservative Fund: sources OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has appointed former member of Parliament Tony Clement to serve on the board of the Conservative Fund, the federal party's main fundraising arm, sources say. ottawa.citynews.ca
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

5 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why doesn't he remove Andrew Scheer from the CPC? Andrew scheer was on the WEF website but quietly removed back during the trucker convoy in Feb 2022. 1-https://web.archive.org/web/20220219134642/https://www.weforum.org/people/andrew-scheer

Andrew Scheer Andrew Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as the Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle since 2004 and as the leader of the conservative party and leader of the official opposition since 2017. He was one of the youngest MPs when he was first elected and his vision and leadership have earned him the continued confidence to be re-elected. web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

6 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why did he lie about not having any WEF members? Pierre himself was in fact listed on the "people" section of the WEF website. During the trucker convoy (Feb 2022) he was quietly removed. 1- https://web.archive.org/web/20210401060525/https://www.weforum.org/people/Pierre-poilievre

Pierre Poilievre The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

7/ 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why is he being supported by the globalist WEF member and ex-PM Steven Harper who originally signed Canada onto the WEF's UN agenda 2030 in 2015? (the SDG's) 1-https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/former-conservative-pm-stephen-harper-endorses-pierre-poilievre-for-party-leader-1.6002020 2-https://www.weforum.org/people/stephen-harper

Former Conservative PM Stephen Harper endorses Pierre Poilievre for party leader Former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper has endorsed Pierre Poilievre to be the party's next leader. ctvnews.ca
Stephen Harper Bachelor's and Master's degree in Economics, University of Calgary. 2002, Leader of the Opposition; co-founded Conservative Party and won party leadership; 2006, Prime Minister of Canada. Recipient of awards: Woodrow Wilson Award for Public Service; first Canadian to be awarded B'nai Brith Presidential Gold Medallion for Humanitarianism (2008). weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

8/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why did lie on camera to @MarkFriesen08 claiming that he did "not read" the SDGS. To be clear, PP the "development minster" claimed he did not read the "Social Development Goals" that he voted on multiple times. 1-https://rumble.com/v1vz45q-pierre-poilievre-meets-mark-friesen-and-claims-to-know-nothing-about-the-sd.html

Pierre Poilievre meets Mark Friesen and claims to know nothing about the SDG Clip of Pierre Poilievre flat out lieing when he meets Mark Freisen as he claims to know nothing about the SDG (sustainable development goals) even though pierre was the Minister of Employment and Soc rumble.com

@print3_d - PRINT3D

9/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why is he supported by, surrounding himself with, Hiring, and appointing WEF members if he's working against them? 🧐 1-https://web.archive.org/web/20210401060525/https://www.weforum.org/people/Pierre-poilievre 2-https://web.archive.org/web/20220219134642/https://www.weforum.org/people/andrew-scheer 3-https://www.weforum.org/people/michelle-rempel-garner 4-https://www.weforum.org/people/john-baird

Pierre Poilievre The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. web.archive.org
Andrew Scheer Andrew Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as the Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle since 2004 and as the leader of the conservative party and leader of the official opposition since 2017. He was one of the youngest MPs when he was first elected and his vision and leadership have earned him the continued confidence to be re-elected. web.archive.org
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

10/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why does he support mass immigration, like Trudeau and Jagmeet and WEF globalist's want. This is also another WEF SDG. Why? Immigration will increase housing prices for everyday Canadians and decrease average wages.

@PierrePoilievre - Pierre Poilievre

We have 26,000 nurses who’ve been trained abroad and are ready and willing to work in Canada to fill the health care worker shortage, but they can’t, because gatekeepers won’t let them. Remove the gatekeepers, and let qualified nurses work in Canada. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/major-immigration-backlog-leaving-thousands-of-trained-health-care-professionals-on-the-sidelines-1.6015229

Major immigration backlog in Canada leaving thousands of trained health-care professionals on the sidelines As hospitals across the country struggle under the weight of major staffing shortages, an immigration backlog described by lawyers as the worst they have ever seen is leaving qualified health professionals sitting on the sidelines. ctvnews.ca

@print3_d - PRINT3D

11 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why does he still support vaccines, the UN SDG goal #3? Even when there is ample evidence the 💉 has many negative side effects. Pfizer's own listed side effects (link #2) 1-https://t.co/qlWl1SoQLg 2- https://t.co/f4JRmeQ5JL https://t.co/M1gtLZWxnW

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

Pfizer Pierre in his recent role as part time marketing exec for Big Harma! Critiquing a sitting govt for "not being globalist enough" is the only form of critique that's allowed under a flu d'état regime. #Uniparty

@healthbyjames - James Cintolo, RN FN CPT

Pfizer lists over 1300 side effects associated with their mRNA vaccine — here they are. This is being suppressed…… @Johanne31785773 https://t.co/FKFDbBUdwe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the Prime Minister for not prioritizing vaccines during the crisis. They point out that while the rest of the world was being vaccinated in January and February, Canada's vaccination rates are lower. They blame the Prime Minister for allowing the spread of variants, which has led to restrictions in Canada. The speaker questions why other countries had access to vaccines earlier while Canada did not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Carlton. Well, what they needed is vaccines. Yeah. That was the one job he had at this point in the crisis. Now he tries to throw on a cape and says he's the hero that's going to solve the problem that he caused. Yeah. The reality is the rest of the world was being vaccinated in January February. Vaccination rates in the US and UK are twice what they are here in Canada. The rest of the world is reopening. Well, we're being confined to our basements because of the wave of the variance that this prime minister allowed. Why did the rest of the world have access to vaccines in January February while we did not?

@print3_d - PRINT3D

BONUS 12/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why does he support the dictator in Ukraine Like LPC & NDP? 4 Billion wasted and counting to Ukraine, this increases our inflation and supports nazis that wont win against Russia anyways. https://t.co/GgKyB0Y50z

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@DiamondsQu33n @reSeeIt save thread

MarkFriesen08
Posted - March 19, 2023 at 9:20 PM
Saved - November 15, 2024 at 11:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted @PierrePoilievre about his stance on the sustainable development agenda, specifically the SDGs. He lied to me and the 500k viewers of the video. I can back this up with his voting record on the relevant law.

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

So when I asked @PierrePoilievre his position on the sustainable development agenda, the SDG’s. He outright lied to me and 500k people that have seen the video. How do I know he lied, here’s his voting record on said law. https://t.co/UH15iKjpFx

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/mlPeBnrRvy

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/7ovLRx4M70

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/lwQrofrec3

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

https://t.co/qNpKkQNclh

print3_d
Posted - June 18, 2023 at 12:22 AM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pierre Poilievre has been accused of lying about his knowledge of the SDGs. Despite voting in favor of bills related to the SDGs and being a member of the SDG committee, he claimed to know nothing about them. A referenced article provides proof of his contradictory statements.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

🧵1/2 Pierre Poilievre lied about reading the SDG's. PP voted yea on Bill C-474, Bill C-57, and the Paris accord all SDG's. He's also a member of ENVI which is 🇨🇦's SDG committee. PPC will remove us from the SDG's Why would PP claim to know nothing about the SDG's? ⬇️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 Nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now, all over the world. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, All water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all Food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed 2 by a 179 Nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the 21st century, and so many of us around the world think that, while sustainable And it just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and, and creating energy and food resources for everyone, and the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, Concentrated city centers and clearing them out of the rural areas. All systems have to be Brought into harmony in order to control them all. Because when systems don't meet, when they're when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, They can't be controlled centrally. And the goal of Agenda 21 is 1 World Government and total control from a central unit. Every nation that signed on to Agenda 21 has its, its local Agenda 21 plan. People in the United States are completely unaware of this. If I go out and talk about this, the United States press will attacks me, and calls me, which is, it's totally ridiculous. It is a, But it's not a theory, it's fact. The 3 pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are Economy, Ecology, and Equity, the 3 E's. And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea Social equity. It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and, no one's, property is going to be used as a Ground because they are at a poverty level. But really what social equity is about, it's about impoverishing Huge portions of the population and bringing down, developed the developed nations. Everything that we're looking at now is Destined to collapse our economies. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world, and what major corporations want in this development is to be able to, to have movement full movement of Of workers without borders or boundaries to be able to move their goods through without regulations, and to reduce wages. And so this is the goal, so this is what you find with social equity. And of course, economy and, ecology is about are the 3 circles: economy, ecology, and social equity, and where they meet in the center is balance, but really that balance It's a communitarian balance. So it's not balance of well-being of the people. What it is is it's a balance or corporation so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area in tightly packed dense areas so that they can be surveilled and managed. And this is what that Balance looks like as far as the development of totalitarian state is. The mainstream media is owned by 5 major corporations, and you're not Going to get this information from the mainstream press. So you need to be your own press. You need to educate yourself. You need to get out there and Educate your neighbors, your community, your real community. You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre kindergarten to postgraduate school. All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others. This is true community To work for personal freedom. And always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals In those groups, and we answer only to ourselves. And this is essential. It's essential as as as free human beings. This is what we are. We are free and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have To become aware that there is a fight, and then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well, and work together.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

🧵2/2 Proof PP lies 1 - https://rumble.com/v2uv2rg-pierre-poilievre-meets-mark-friesen-lies-about-reading-the-un-sdg.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5 PP lies 2 - ENVI- https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/ENVI/Members?includeAssociates=True#AssociateMembers Article proving pierre lied https://boereport.com/2020/11/20/economic-triage-for-canada-in-the-face-of-green-agendas-and-net-zero/

Pierre Poilievre meets Mark Friesen Lies about reading the UN SDG Clip of Pierre Poilievre flat out lieing when he meets Mark Freisen as he claims to know nothing about the SDG (sustainable development goals) even though pierre was the Minister of Employment and Soc rumble.com
ENVI - Members - House of Commons of Canada A list of current and past members of the Environment and Sustainable Development. Link to each Member's individual profile or find information about associate members of the committee. ourcommons.ca
Economic triage for Canada in the face of green agendas and net-zero | BOE Report As the Canadian federal government proposed net-zero legislation this week in the House of Commons, issues around net-zero and the green agenda could mean big problems for consumers and significant disconnects for the Canadian economy. This week, in a virtual panel discussion, MP Pierre Poilievre, Jack Mintz, Dan McTeague, and Catherine Swift discussed the UN boereport.com

@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️

Me: Does the Conservative Party under your leadership support the “United Nations Sustainable Development Goals” Pierre: I don’t know what those are but I don’t support anything imposed on us by any global organization. Me: I asked why he voted in favor in 2017 then? Pierre: “I’m not sure I don’t know what they are”

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

DerrickSweet
Posted - October 14, 2023 at 7:03 PM
Saved - October 14, 2023 at 10:31 PM

@DerrickSweet - Exposing UN, WEF, WHO & Federal Reserve Corruption

#WEF’s radical far left plan to heavily restrict our food choices, travel options & rights to own property is NOT a conspiracy, it’s on their website. #JustinTrudeau, who’s guilty of treason & murder for his role in #Agenda2030’s unwritten goal to #depopulate the planet, must go!

@KangasBackyard - 'Roo 🇦🇺

Absolutely spot on 🎯 perfect summation of the Globalists Plan #Agenda2030 https://t.co/dRID7DO85P

Video Transcript AI Summary
The C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group aims for zero meat and dairy consumption, limited clothing items, no private vehicles, and fewer flights to combat climate change. This plan, outlined in the "Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5 Degree World" report, is supported by Michael Bloomberg and around 100 cities worldwide. Recent progress includes New York City limiting meat and dairy in institutions, the UK banning gas-powered vehicles after 2035, and France banning short-haul flights. Critics argue that these measures are about social control rather than climate change, as globalist leaders continue to fly in private jets and wealthy individuals buy up farmland. There are even proposals to genetically modify humans to be allergic to red meat and shrink human size through eugenics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get taken down or severely jeopardize my account, but I don't think I'm wasting my breath. I think it's important because the c forty cities climate leadership group, they have this ambitious target. By the year of 2030 of 0 kilograms of meat consumption, 0 kilograms of dairy consumption, just 3 new clothing items per year per person. Definitely not applying to the people like in the Met Gala, the Oscars, the Grammys. 0 private owned vehicles and 1 short haul return flight less than 1500 kilometers Every 3 years per person, all in the name of the climate. And this dystopias all laid out in the future of urban consumption in a 1.5 degree world report. So It's not a conspiracy which c 40 cities released in 2019, and they have reemphasized it every year since. Michael Bloomberg, he's the leader of the group, and he provides majority of its funding in the association, it consists of around a 100 cities from around the world. Some of the American cities on this board, they include, Send Boston, Chicago, Houston, Miami, Los Angeles, New Orleans, New York City, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Washington DC, and Seattle. And we've seen extreme progress just this year alone as the New York City mayor, Eric Adams, he announced that the city will place limits on the amount of meat and dairy served by the city institutions. For example, schools that are gonna Degenerate the minds of our youth and prisons so keep them still mentally ill. We've seen the UK ban the sale of new gas powered vehicles after 2035. We've seen France banned short haul flights to cut carbon emissions. This reset is a wolf in sheep's clothing. It has more to do with social control They need climate. These globalist leaders will permit you from the ways of living that I just stated, but they will continue flying to their climate meetings in their private jet. The World Economic Forum, they stated in 2016 that you'll owe nothing and you'll be happy. We see private billionaires today buying up farmland everywhere. And this is to ensure reliance on the government's food supply and, of course, push us away from self sufficiency when it comes to red meat. I've posted on this briefly that there were this world economic forum link bioethicist doctor Matthew Liao. And he has proposed the idea of genetically modifying humans to be allergic to red meat and what we call today as alpha gal syndrome. And we assume also that it's coming from a tick. Okay? He's also discussed Us, shrinking the size of humans through eugenics and hormone injections so that we'll need to consume fewer resources. This is anti human Banning meat and dairy, private vehicles, hurting us into cities, genetically altering our bodies and degenerating the masses will hurt the planet and the people.
cosminDZS
Posted - October 30, 2023 at 7:30 PM
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 5:49 AM

@cosminDZS - Cosmin Dzsurdzsa 🇷🇴🦇

Remember when PM Justin Trudeau said that it was "misinformation" that his government wants to reduce fertilizer use by 30%. Well Agriculture Minister @L_MacAulay just let the cat out of the bag in his latest report. These maniacs want a blanket 30% fertilizer use reduction. https://t.co/IH8oyzkOoT

therobprimo1
Posted - November 7, 2023 at 2:47 PM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:48 PM

@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️

Today the @CBCNews has reported that @PierrePoilievre won’t say if he will commit to Canada achieving the Paris Climate Accord. The state broadcaster obviously is incapable of doing any research. I got the answer quite some time ago because you just service the machine. https://t.co/mo2WuvwFFE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Conservative leader Pierre Polivier refuses to confirm if Canada will commit to its emission targets under the Paris agreement. When asked if he will denounce the accord, Polivier avoids a direct answer. Instead, he states that his agenda and policy focus on reducing emissions and delivering at a lower cost.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: NBC News reports conservative leader Pierre Polivier won't say if he will commit Canada to achieving its promised emission targets under the Paris agreement on climate change. Don't worry, CBC. We know as our state broadcaster, you are completely incapable of doing any journalistic at work. So I've done that work for you. When you're prime minister, will you denounce the the Paris Climate Accord or no? Speaker 1: We're gonna we're gonna hit the hit the the emissions reduction targets. Speaker 0: Is it fair to say no, Speaker 1: you won't then? We're we're gonna we're gonna reduce the emissions, And we're going to deliver at a lower cost at the same time. That's my agenda. That's my policy.
liberal_party
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 5:00 PM
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 10:22 PM

@liberal_party - Liberal Party

Pierre Poilievre and his Conservatives have no plan to fight climate change, and they want to take money out of Canadians’ pockets. Their climate denial would cut our price on pollution rebates, hurt our economy, and take Canada backward. https://t.co/iYUhuwJhBa

rexglacer
Posted - November 23, 2023 at 12:27 PM
Saved - November 24, 2023 at 11:11 AM

@rexglacer - Rex Glacer

@hollyanndoan @SDTC_TDDC @MikeBarrettON So Conservatives not voting for a carbon tax in the Ukraine is anti-Democracy but covering up crimes for the Liberals is the definition of Democracy... https://t.co/sGpNvxzssw

john_stelios
Posted - November 23, 2023 at 7:43 PM
Saved - November 24, 2023 at 12:56 AM

@john_stelios - Rob Rohrke

Canadians are fighting over which players from the same team will rape us with sustainable development…but they’re intelligent voters.. This populous is the most dumbed down it’s ever been… Vote for the country you want folks not just simply to win against the liberal idiots https://t.co/q6g2ez3zqW

JudyMaxB9632935
Posted - December 8, 2023 at 1:42 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 8:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
MP @s_guilbeault's radical agenda and behavior at a world forum were criticized. Premier @ABDanielleSmith has legal support. MPs should prioritize serving the people, not personal interests. The Sultan's response was well-deserved.

@JudyMaxB9632935 - Judy Maxine🍎🇨🇦

The only tactics @s_guilbeault understands are the ones he practiced as a rebel climate activist. An MP is elected to serve the people Steve, not himself and his own personal radical agendas. Your behavior at a world forum was despicable. At least the Sultan gave you a well deserved sm@ckd0wn. Premier @ABDanielleSmith has the LAW on her side. Give it up.

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

Breaking… Alberta Premier Danielle Smith: “You do not come to an international conference and then drop 2 unilateral policies in our jurisdiction…. The attitude that Minister Guilbeault has taken towards our province is absolutely unacceptable…. He is a menace.” Yep! 🤠👍 https://t.co/3xqyVFkVWb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the federal government's production cap on Alberta's oil and gas sector, calling it an intentional attack on the economy. They argue that Alberta has the exclusive jurisdiction to develop and manage its resources. The speaker accuses Justin Trudeau and the Minister of Environment and Climate Change of risking billions of dollars in investment and core social programs. They express frustration with the unilateral policies announced without agreement and criticize the minister's attitude towards the province. The speaker hopes for a collaborative approach but suggests that the minister should be replaced, as they believe he is a menace to national unity and obstructing progress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today's announced de facto production cap on on Alberta's oil and gas sector amounts to an intentional attack by the federal government on the economy of Alberta and the financial well-being of millions of Albertans and Canadians. Alberta owns our resources. And under the constitution, we have the exclusive jurisdiction to develop them and to manage them. With his pronouncement today singling out the oil and gas sector alone for punitive federal treatment, Justin Trudeau and his eco extremist minister of the environment and climate change, Stephen Giebeau, are risking 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in investment in Alberta's and Canada's economy and core social programs. You do not come to an international conference and then drop Two unilateral policies in our jurisdiction out of the blue without getting our agreement. That is what they essentially did this past where he gets unacceptable and it's unprofessional. The attitude that that minister Ghebeau has taken towards our province is absolutely unacceptable. And in fact, He has so he has arrogantly said that whatever conversations that we've had at this table are irrelevant. And he's demonstrated that by coming here, unilaterally announcing 2 policies and accepting, expecting us to just suck it up. So absolutely, we want to work collaboratively with those ministers who want to work with us. I quite frankly hope that Justin Trudeau replaces this minister. He's a menace. He's a menace to us. He's a menace to national unity. He is clearly destructive in trying to to get to some common ground, and that is on him. It's not on us.
Concern70732755
Posted - December 8, 2023 at 1:44 PM
Saved - December 10, 2023 at 11:08 PM

@Concern70732755 - Concerned Canadian

I concur with Smith that Steven Guilbeault is a menace to our political structure as well as to our once iconic confederation. Trudeau is allowing a climate change activist & zealot to ruin Canada & our economy! Why ? https://t.co/hZDVzOFuyD

EvaVlaar
Posted - December 8, 2023 at 6:12 PM
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 9:32 PM

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

The globalists want to get rid of our farmers, cattle and windmills, and replace it with their synthetic meat, bugs, solar panels and dystopian wind turbines. Don’t let them. The green agenda is a scam and the climate ‘crisis’ doesn’t exist. It’s all about money and control. https://t.co/UlYKksbyZu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the opposition to farming practices in the Netherlands, which are blamed for climate change. They argue that it doesn't make sense to blame agriculture when it has been a successful industry for centuries. The speaker questions the proposed alternatives, such as wind turbines, solar panels, and synthetic foods, which they view as a manufactured and unnatural solution. They believe that these alternatives are not as beneficial for the environment as the cows grazing in the fields. The speaker concludes by stating that deep down, everyone knows that the opposition's claims are false.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So with the farmers, it became so apparent to me, you know, just looking out at the Dutch landscape, seeing the cows graze with our windmills and our waters Yes. And that's what they oppose. That's what they say causes climate change. And then you see there this, Like, that's still the world. Speaker 1: That's that's like Yeah. Being fully in life, embracing the resources of nature To harness them for your flourishing. Right? Speaker 0: We've done it for 100 of years. Speaker 1: And no wonder that Netherlands is the 2nd largest Speaker 0: Exporter poor agricultural products in the world. Exactly. And and that that is now suddenly the cause for a new problem like climate change. It doesn't make any sense. And then, what do these people propose as the alternative? You know, they say that the farming and the cows and all of that, that's the problem. And then they their world is filled with these wind turbines, and, solar panels, and fake meats, and synthetic stuff. And you're like, okay. So that Dystopian gray, like, manufactured world of yours, that is so that is more green. That is more, Like, that's closer to nature, to who we are and that's better for the world than those those poor cows standing there in the grass? Like, Nobody like with your own eyes, you know, if you look at that you know that that's a lie. Everybody knows deep down that's a lie.
CRUSADEwisdom
Posted - January 3, 2024 at 5:19 PM
Saved - January 5, 2024 at 6:48 AM

@CRUSADEwisdom - CRUSADEwisdom

@LeslynLewis UN - must watch. Justin Trudeau is in fact part of a Globalist coup d’état https://t.co/bn2fhu3w8x

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the UN's agenda to establish a global government under the pretext of climate change. They highlight the failures of previous attempts, such as the Kyoto Protocol, and the exaggerated claims made about the effects of Chlorofluorocarbons on the ozone layer. The speaker also mentions that countries like China and India are not willing to restrict their CO2 emissions, as it would hinder their economic growth. They believe that the upcoming COP 21 conference will succeed in establishing a global government, but eventually people will realize the truth and reject it. The speaker criticizes the House of Lords for excluding those who question the official narrative on climate change.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This entire process of saying there is a global problem that requires the rest the west to shut down itself and to subsidize the rest of the world is a double whammy. We've got to shut down, and we've got to subsidize the rest the world. They've been trying to achieve this at the UN for a long time. Their first attempt was the Kyoto Protocol to do with, Chlorofluorocarbons, which was some of the byproducts of refrigeration. And they were saying this was causing a damage to the ozone It turned out that the single paper on which they relied had exaggerated tenfold the adverse effect of Chlorofluorocarbons on ozone in the stratosphere. They simply got it wrong, but that didn't matter to them. They pursued it anyway, and they got the Montreal Protocol in 1992. At the meeting at which they achieved this, professor Dicklyn heard Bert Bolian of the IPCC, He was in charge of it at that time. Say to him, just you wait. You'd see we've got this one through far easier than we ever should on the science. Now just wait until you see what we do with global warming. And this was only 4 years after the IPCC had been set up. Hardly anybody had heard of global warming at that time, but already the UN was planning to use this as a way of making itself into a global government, which is what they've been doing over the past few years, and they will hope to set the seal on that at Paris this December. And that global government not be elected by anyone. And the c o two story line has purely been the pretext which they are using in order to establish a global government. In order to do that, they had to say there is a global problem and only global action can solve it. That's why they chose the CO two thing. Because it's virtually impossible to prove directly by any scientific means that c o two cannot have the enormous effect, they say. The fact that it's not likely to have the enormous effect, they say, is, of course, another matter altogether. Speaker 1: And there is no likelihood now. We've now had eighteen and Speaker 0: a half years without any global warming despite record increases in CO two concentrations. That is the problem they face scientifically, but they don't care. Because by December this year, they will have their climate treaty in place, which would effectively have turned the UN into what it has always wanted to be and has been scheming and manipulating to be for half a century. They want to be a global government. And after mid December of this year, that is what, in effect, they will be. And nobody will elect them. Nobody will have any, chance to control them, but they will control the world. And it will be like the EU on a grand scale. It'll start small, gradually because of the enormous power and wealth that a single global administration will will have. They will grow in power, they will grow in strength, and they will gradually reach their tentacles into every aspect of our lives. This is the ultimate totalitarian global government, and it's happening because of a proposition which is essentially fraudulent. Speaker 1: And how do they factor in, say, Russia and China and India, Brazil that are not going along with this program to some large degree. Speaker 0: In December last year, president Obama went to China because China blew the Copenhagen attempt to set up a world government out of the water there. They were even incautious enough to call it a government. They actually, in the treaty draft, they said this is a government they're establishing, and it will have the powers of government, powers of enforcement, powers of taxation, powers of regulation. They actually admitted it. And if you want to see this, you'll find it in articles, annex 1, article 36 and 38 of that draft. Now, in the latest draft, they're coyly calling it a global governing body, and they didn't want China blowing this out of the water again. So Obama goes to China in at the behest of the UN. And he says to them, we will exempt China from any restrictions at all. You would admit what you like. Make the noises about how you're trying to control it because that will help your fellow communists worldwide. But whatever you do, don't blow this treaty out of the water. This is going to be just like the EU. It's essentially a totalitarian communist project. This will be the same, but on a global scale. Don't mess it up for your fellow communists. This was Obama's message to China. And so China has agreed to this. They are making noises about how we are controlling CO2. They're not, of course. To give you the figures, it's rather interesting. In 2004, for the first time, China outpaced the United States and emitted more CO 2 in total, 14% of global emissions. And China was also 14%. Within a decade, they became 28%. And they're now more like 33%. They're now a third of all emissions of CO 2, and they have been exempted from making any restrictions. India, which you also mentioned, has announced that it too will not countenance any restrictions. It needs to electrify its population. At the moment, most of its population don't have basic electricity. Without that, you cannot get enough prosperity to stabilize the population by making sure that prosperity stops the birth rate from increasing. It's not contraception and abortion that controls birth rates worldwide. It's prosperity. India and China know this perfectly well. And so the 2 biggest So getting off the goes down. That's right. Getting half the population of the world, which is those 2 countries is roughly getting off half the population of the world. They are not going to play. Likewise, many other third world countries are not going to play. Africa isn't going to play. That's hugely populated. South America isn't going to play. They're all going to make the noises about how they're going to play because they want to get the fistfuls of cash that the UN has bribed them with. It said, we'll get the western money, and we'll give it to you if only you go along with this. So all the poorer countries will vote for this treaty. A lot of the rich ones, the EU, will vote for it. America, of course, with Obama will vote for it. Congress won't ratify it. But how are they going to overcome that? It's still going to be a treaty, and they're going to call it a treaty. And they're going to wait until the next time there's a Democrat administration that also controls both houses of congress, then they will ratify the treaty locking America in. Because once America has been locked into that treaty, then it has no unilateral right to secede. And increasingly the way the left has been operating in recent years is by making treaties among left wing countries. And then when a country temporarily under a democracy that becomes left wing, that then joins the left wing countries that have already signed the treaty, and that locks that country into the treaty with no hope of cessation. Now the Kyoto Protocol contained an instrument of secession within it. It had a little paragraph number 27 that simply said, if you give x years, 3 years notice of your intention to secede from this treaty, you have the right to leave without further penalty. Nobody can stop you. There is no such provision for secession in the draft UN treaty on climate. They want to lock people in using this left wing is amusing the fact that treaties under the US constitution take precedence over your own constitution and your laws. Once you have ratified a treaty with a foreign country. Only if those foreign countries with whom you ratified that treaty let you out will you be free of it. And since America will be the biggest payer into this UN monstrosity, there's no way they'll let you out. Speaker 1: And how how does Russia figure into this? Speaker 0: Russia is also paying lip service to this. In 2004, the Russian Academy of Sciences had conference on the climate at which they asked both sides to come. They looked around the world to find the sappiest and most true believing country they could, which was, of course, Britain at the governing class level. And sir David King, a fatuous chemist, who was at that time the government's chief scientific adviser for some unfathomable reason, was invited to Moscow to lead a delegation to give the official position of the UN climate, but they also invited several skeptics. The moment that King arrived at Sheremetyevo Airport in Moscow. He saw several skeptics, recognized them, realized that he'd been set up and cut and ran and tried to get back in the plane. He was arrested by the FSB. He was taken to the Kremlin and made to give his presentation. Halfway through his presentation, doctor Roy Spencer, who was there, interjected and said, oh, for heaven's sake, said David, that that you're talking nonsense. You know, you really can't make that point. David King, who is not used to anyone answering back because the way the left frame it is they normally never get into any situation where they have to debate with the other side because they always lose. He fledged out of the room and refuse to take any more part. The FSB looked at, Andrei Illarionov, the doctor from the Russian Academy who was running the proceedings. He said, let him go. Then Ira Ileryonov went to the microphone, and he said, Sir David King has disgraced the name of the United Kingdom. He has disgraced the name of King, and he has disgraced the name of sir. He has, however, revealed to us exactly who is right and who is wrong on the climate, and he is wrong. Because a man who was right would stand here and defend himself on being criticized by a fellow and he has failed to do that. Indeed, when he realized there would be scientists here who took a different view, he tried not even to come and give this talk. And so we now have seen by his behavior where the truth really lies. And we will be reporting back to the academy that global warming is a subject on which great caution should be exercised before either side should be taken. So you held out Now halt for Russia. Now. That was the position then. A few months later, David King having reported back that he'd been humiliated in Russia, Teddy Blair, who was then the left wing prime minister of Britain, saw Putin and said, either you change the your academies too on the climate, or we will not vote to give you most favored nation status at the World Trade Organization. Putin cut a deal with Blair, rang Ilyaev and said, I'm terribly sorry. You're going to have to change your view. And ever since then, the Russian Academy has officially said, global warming is terrible. We we are true believers like robots. Privately, they don't believe a word of Same with the Japanese Academy of Sciences, where the official government line is this is all terrible, though that's now beginning to change. Japan is one of the countries that is going to take, I think, in the end, a pragmatic view on this and say we're not going to play. But as a group at the Chinese at the Japanese Academy of Sciences, which is saying very openly that belief in the IPCC's extremist position on this is like believing in astrology, the best description I haven't heard of it. So that's Russia. Of course, what's in it for Russia is they want to go on selling overpriced natural gas from Siberia where they have trillions of cubic feet via the many pipelines that now run into Western Europe, where the price of gas is 4 times the world price. Why? Because we won't allow fracking. Under under under Blackpool. There is the largest resource of natural gas in Western Europe. And because of Putin, paying our pressure groups like Greenpeace to go and agitate and say that fracking is dangerous, which it isn't. It's been done for 60 years in Britain, and nobody's died of it yet. They, they have managed to stop the government from going ahead and opening up that vast field. And the same in other European countries because the Europe is now no longer governed by democracy. It's governed by the European Union, which is essentially a Marxist construct. It's a centralized bureaucratic, unelected bureaucracy. And it knows that its power depends on pretending that it has a justification for its continued existence. And, this speech that we can only do this if we all band together in a global coalition and the regional coalitions, that is is mesmericly attractive to the governing class worldwide, which is why governments have usually gone along with this storyline instead of asking the right questions. Speaker 1: COP 21, do you think they're gonna pull it off? Speaker 0: Yes. I do. I think it's become unstoppable. However, I think it'd be like the EU. It would cost everybody an enormous amount of money, an enormous amount of freedom freedom for a time, then people will realize they were wrong. And although the, global government, once it is established, will rapidly try to reposition itself and find other justifications for its continued existence. And there will be treaty modifications year after year to shift away from the climate where where they will find they've been simply wrong and towards other things to try to justify the continued existence of a global government. Because they started with a lie, and we will say that and go on saying that. They will eventually realize this is not acceptable. And they, and with luck, the people of the world will refused to go on paying for this, refused to go on deferring to it, much as Britain is now busy trying to disengage itself from the EU. Whether the public will, in the end, vote against it? Difficult to say. The opinion polls suggest probably not. Fact is there's a very large minority now that don't want the EU in the UK. And at times, on the on the opinion polls, it has been a majority. And I think that that will be the pattern. We will get our global government. Everybody will end up hating it. And gradually, it will be dismantled. Speaker 1: Now the House of Lords, you would seem it would seem to be somewhat impervious to Financial pressures. How are they, being kept into this scenario of the official story of? Speaker 0: Well, of course, they keep the likes of me out. You know, if I were allowed to take a seat in the House of Lords, even though I'm a member of it, I don't actually have a seat or a vote there. Of course, I would be saying the truth on this. And no minister would be able, however well briefed, to cope with the vast storm of scientific knowledge that I now have. Because they in 1999, they voted to exclude my father and all other hereditary peers from the house, choosing only 90 of them from among themselves to to sit. My father was not one of the 90 who was chosen. And so I have no right to sit or vote, but I still have the title. And so by keeping the likes of me out, they can make sure that those who are there largely don't know as much as I do about it. Therefore, they they can They they can advance the official line. And what what these people are doing, of course, is it's become part of the the taboos of the governing class. If you want to be seen as a player in the governing class, you have to go along with this regardless of whether it's true. One should never forget that in in matters like this, where the governing class has decided that something is convenient, expedient, and profit, the one thing they will never do is worry about whether it's true or not. It doesn't matter how often you say to them, but this is mad. It makes A sense has been they they were warming for eighteen and a half years. You know, I've got 12 slides which show different models over predicting it, and some of those slides have got 50, a 100 models on each slide. But none of it's worked. We know that. They do not care about the facts. This has become a taboo. It's become effectively a new religion, or I I would call it a superstition. The distinction being 2 between the 2 is that a religion is something which might or might not be True. Which you can't prove it either way. Whereas a superstition is something which definitely isn't true, and you can prove it, but people still adhere to it. This is a superstition. And it's it's eaten deeply into the governing class because it is both socially convenient, politically expedient, and above all, wickedly financially This is the largest transfer of wealth in human history from the poor to the rich, from the little guy to the big guy, from, in in French terms, the to the. This is an enrichment and and an empowerment of the govern the powerful governing class at the expense of the rest of us. I don't like the smell of it. And gradually, 1 by 1, the people are waking up to this. The people have now largely seen through the global warming scam for the scam that it is. The governing class have also interestingly seen. So they know now that it isn't true, but they don't care whether it's true or not. It's expedient. It's convenient, and it's profitable. Therefore, as far as they're concerned, it is so.
KodyBloisNS
Posted - January 4, 2024 at 12:40 AM
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 11:17 AM

@KodyBloisNS - Kody Blois

Good idea Leslyn… let’s take Canada 🇨🇦 out of an international forum with 193 countries around the world. This stuff is actually bat shit crazy, and I don’t know what is more ridiculous the fact she is peddling this stuff or that she sits in the @CPC_HQ Shadow Cabinet. https://t.co/sqlBXtYFQ8

LionAdvocacy
Posted - January 4, 2024 at 4:35 AM
Saved - January 5, 2024 at 5:20 AM

@LionAdvocacy - Lion Advocacy

Massive, coordinated Liberal MP & Senator attack on @LeslynLewis for having the temerity to challenge Canada’s affiliation with the UN. All of this funded by Canadian taxpayers under an increasingly oppressive tax regime. Not. Sustainable. https://t.co/wacSItsvQM

Welly17Welly
Posted - January 4, 2024 at 4:48 PM
Saved - January 4, 2024 at 5:11 PM

@Welly17Welly - A/B Tecky

@Naturegirl571 It’s worse than you think. Trudeau is as bad as Biden..

@McfarlaneGlenda - Glenda M 🇨🇦 🍎

Just a very small glimpse of who Justin Trudeau is but enough to beg the question of how on earth does anyone support this guy. https://t.co/LGlrzdJqoA

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have learned from my parents' experiences, but I prefer not to discuss it on camera. I have no interest in politics and prioritize my family and becoming a teacher. The government is considering changing the age of consent for different types of sex. We are eager to move forward with this change. I admire China's ability to enforce their dictatorship, even though it goes against our fundamental rights. This creates a loophole where the majority can override the rights of the minority.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There anything you've learned from the experiences that both your parents have gone through? Mhmm. Nothing I should talk about on camera, I think. The politician all already. No. Never. Never. Never. Never. I'm gonna be a teacher. I don't like politics. I don't like the Personal cost, having a family for me, having kids, you know, is going to be is, you know, one of the absolute of Priorities and will be the center of Speaker 1: my Some of those recommendations including think included things that the government could change now. For instance, the differential age of consent when it comes are anal sex versus, vaginal sex. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Is that something that the government Speaker 0: Yeah. That's something that we're, we're very much looking forward, to moving, arm. Moving on, in in short order. Already really was an amazing feeling. It it it hits you. This country is a country of openness, of respect, of compassion, option. Of the rule of law of of, admiration I actually have for China, because their, are, you know, basic dictatorship is allowing them Regardless of the fact that we are attacking are Your fundamental rights are limiting your fundamental rights. And the charter says that wrong. We're still gonna go ahead and do it. Whatever. It's basically a loophole that allows arms. A majority to override fundamental rights of a minority.
govt_corrupt
Posted - March 21, 2024 at 2:51 PM
Saved - March 21, 2024 at 5:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
NDP Climate Critic claims Canada's record forest fires indicate a climate crisis. She proposes taxing O&G profits and capping output to address affordability and the climate emergency. However, I disagree with her approach. #ClimateChange #Canada #NDP GasPriceWizard

@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt

#BREAKING: NDP Climate Critic says Canada is in crisis and record forest fires is proof our climate is burning! She says the only way to make life more affordable and deal with the climate emergency is to tax O&G profits and cap output so companies can no longer produce! These are not serious people and only a lunatic would take this nonsense seriously!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Canadians are feeling the impacts of the climate emergency with wildfires and extreme weather. The government spent $34 billion on the Trans Mountain pipeline instead of investing in real climate solutions. Big oil CEOs profit while Canadians struggle. We need a windfall tax on oil and gas profits, regulations to cap emissions, and investments in clean jobs and climate resilience. The current government delays climate action, while conservatives deny the crisis. We need to end fossil fuel subsidies and prioritize real climate solutions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know what? I Canadians know that we are in a climate emergency. They are feeling the impacts. Wildfires have ravaged our country. It means that not only our communities evacuated from their homes, but just this week, a young child in Edmonton described breathing the air as it feels like an elephant is sitting on my chest. We are witnessing extreme weather, horrific pollution. This is our day to day life. Hundreds of people died in the heat domes in British Columbia. And we have a government who, the day after declaring a emergency, purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline which now cost taxpayers $34,000,000,000. $34,000,000,000 which could have been invested in real climate solutions. You know, CEOs of big oil and gas are making 1,000,000 of dollars while everyday Canadians are struggling to pay for their groceries, for their rent, where we are well, we are seeing the climate burn because these companies are fueling the climate crisis. We need a government that will implement a windfall tax on the excess profits that oil and gas are making. We need a government that is going to stop handing out 1,000,000,000 of dollars to the companies that are responsible for the mess we're in. We need a government that will actually create the regulations to cap oil and gas, to bring down our emissions, and to invest in making life more affordable, in making our communities climate resilient, in creating the climate solutions that will bring us forward and create the good clean jobs, the jobs of the future. This is the vision I see for Canada and unfortunately, we have a government right now that delays, that breaks climate commitments, and then we have the conservatives who deny that there is a crisis. Canadians shouldn't have to choose between delay and denial. We need a path forward that stops fossil fuel subsidies and that invests in real climate solutions. Thank you.

@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt

. @GasPriceWizard

TheoFleury14
Posted - July 31, 2024 at 3:16 PM
Saved - August 1, 2024 at 11:03 PM

@TheoFleury14 - Theo Fleury

Canadian government official praising a communist country???? Do you think this dude is one of the compromised MP’s??? Yes he is. He just outed himself. Canada has been compromised by China 🇨🇳

@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt

#BREAKING: Canada's Energy Minister praises China for being thoughtful about Climate Change! He says the science is settled! Jasper is just another example and anyone who denies climate change poses a threat to Canada! Then announces another 300M in green energy funding! https://t.co/BokGgkBg8z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Climate change is a pressing issue with devastating consequences. Countries like China are capitalizing on renewable energy and electric vehicle technologies. Canada must acknowledge climate change, shape its economic strategy accordingly, and ensure competitiveness in a declining oil and gas market. Failure to do so threatens economic prosperity. The government of Canada is investing $300 million to support hydrogen operations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We talk a lot about climate change these days for obvious reasons. Climate change is altering our world's natural environment in a myriad of harmful ways. Last year's wildfire season was instructive in this regard. And just last week, I think the images that we saw coming out of Jasper were horrifying and devastating. Events like these are showing us what the future will look like if we fail to tackle the threat of climate change. That is obviously a future that we must work to avoid. At the same time, climate change is creating enormous economic opportunities for countries that are thoughtful, determined, and focused. It is not a fluke of chance that China is now the number one developer and deployer of renewable energy technologies, the number one manufacturer and deployer of electric vehicle technologies and that it controls much of the critical minerals value chains around the world. That is the product of a thoughtful economic strategy. For Canada to seize the extraordinary opportunities being created by the transition to a net zero future, we must first accept the scientific reality of climate change, and we must then ensure that this informs and shapes Canada's economic strategy. The second part of the strategy is having a thoughtful approach to ensuring the competitiveness of Canada's oil and gas sector in what will eventually be a declining global market. Such an approach requires aggressive action to reduce emissions from the sector to ensure that Canada will remain competitive in a world that will value the lowest carbon products. Without intending to be overly partisan, I would say that the recognition this recognition is not one that is yet shared by all federal political leaders in Canada. I would say that the absence of any recognition of the reality of climate change and the absence of any kind of economic plan that is focused on seizing the economic opportunities of a low carbon future, something that our allies in the United States, in the European Union and competitors like China have long ago figured out, represents a threat to Canada's future economic competitiveness and its prosperity. Over the past 2 years, the federal government has taken significant action and announced a number of investments to help seize the hydrogen opportunity. Today I am pleased to announce that the government of Canada will be providing up to $300,000,000 to support the operations of this window.
PaulMitchell_AB
Posted - August 26, 2024 at 4:48 PM
Saved - August 27, 2024 at 2:32 PM

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

Hey Alberta, Did you know the United Nations and its leader are actively brainwashing kids all over the world to "demand" a "just transition and the phase out of fossil fuels"? Why is Canada supporting an organization that is actively fighting against us? @ABDanielleSmith https://t.co/3VlDrgtvMy

JayGenXer
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 12:11 PM
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 6:18 AM

@JayGenXer - JayGenXer🇨🇦

Hey Canada, be thankful for this Bill C293 as the Liberals just care about YOU! In a not at all way! https://t.co/ClgcR9yRCZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Canadian Liberal party is promoting Bill C293 to protect citizens. To keep people safe, the bill avoids defining "pandemic" or "emergency." While admitting past surveillance issues where 33,000,000 Canadians were secretly tracked, the party claims they will improve. Decision-making will be ceded to the WHO due to international border concerns. Businesses can be closed and used as shelters. Food production can be slowed or stopped due to health risks associated with agriculture. The bill allows for freezing and redirecting assets, and nationalizing industries. Private property and land can be expropriated for pandemic-related causes. The promise is that people will own nothing, but be happy, safe, and healthy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, hey. I'm Canadian. I wanted to tell you about some of the great work that our Liberal party has been up to lately, including Bill C293. Bill C293 is here to protect you. And we wanna do things better this time in Canada. So let me tell you how we will be keeping you safe this time. Now, the first step is to make sure that we don't actually define what a pandemic is or what an emergency is so that we can protect you at any time. We realized that there was a surveillance problem. And even though last time, we secretly tracked 33,000,000 Canadians, this time, we're gonna do it better. We realized international borders were actually a problem. So this time, we're gonna cede all decision making to an unelected foreign body, AKA the WHO. Now in case we need to protect people, we actually put it in here that we can close businesses at any time and use them as shelters to protect all the people. Now we determined that agriculture and eating food might be a health risk. So we put in here that at any time that we can slow or stop food production. Now you guys know fighting a pandemic costs lots of money. So in case we need more of it, we want to be able to freeze assets, redirect them, and even nationalize industries if we have to. But because we're serious about keeping you guys healthy, we also want to be able to expropriate any kind of private property, land, and seize it for pandemic related causes. Don't worry. You're gonna own nothing. You'll be happy. You'll be safe, and you'll be healthy.
KatKanada_TM
Posted - November 8, 2024 at 4:12 AM
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 2:57 PM

@KatKanada_TM - 🅾️ Kat Kanada

POILIEVRE: “I’m against any of these agendas. I’m never going to do what the UN tells me to do. I’m banning my members from being involved in the WEF. Man: “ESG, DEI?” POILIEVRE: “It’s all garbage!” https://t.co/i6aZHbZARG

Video Transcript AI Summary
You've raised concerns about building houses and managing healthcare with increased migration. Regarding Agenda 2030, it's essential to ask Bernie about his involvement with the WAF, as he has been accused of lying about it. There are questions about past leaders signing onto these agendas, but I firmly oppose them. I believe in free enterprise where businesses succeed based on their products, not lobbying. Workers should keep more of their wages, and government should minimize interference. While I appreciate your support, I understand the skepticism surrounding voting. Ultimately, the election will present two stark choices, and it's crucial to consider the implications of each.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you've done, you know, it will Speaker 1: be basically on a growing recommendation for the Spanish well that's Speaker 0: basically caused a lot of years of this kind of hardship. And I'm just kinda curious how how do you plan on building so many houses when we don't have the tradespeople? And we have we don't have the health care that can handle 1,000,000 more of migration. And, like, agenda like, agenda 2030, like, all these agendas Yeah. Kind of Speaker 1: So I'll go through Speaker 2: it 1 by 1. So the the agenda 2030, first thing is you gotta ask some actually Bernie about that because he's part of the WAF. Speaker 1: And And and Speaker 0: he Can Andrew Jeff one? Speaker 2: I didn't interrupt you. So so Bernie went to the WAF, and then he lied about it. That was the worst part. You know, I knew that he was part of the WAF, but he should just gone back to it. And then he got caught lying. So if you look up this article by True North, where they caught him lying, and he lied to the people about his involvement. What else is he lying? Speaker 1: So that's the Speaker 0: Did Harper sign us into that, though? Speaker 2: He On Speaker 1: his way out? He wasn't forced to go. He went Speaker 2: by No. Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 0: He signed us into agenda 2030 and Mulberry signed us into agenda 21. Speaker 2: Where Bernier was was went to the WF on his own. Speaker 0: Like, I'm gonna vote for you. I'm I'm a PTC supporter. I'm gonna vote for you. Speaker 1: I get it. Speaker 0: I wanna give you enough rope that you can do what you need to do. And if you don't, then throw away people. That's that's my Speaker 2: my honest opinion. So I I'm against any of these agendas. I'm never gonna do what the UN tells me to do. I'm not banning my members for being involved in the world economics. We're going to have to put people on. We're gonna get rid of the mandates, ban Speaker 1: a big industry. Speaker 2: They're trying to make interest groups like, corporate corporate executives and insiders filthy rich, and they don't care about any of the causes that they talk about. They don't care about those causes. They're a bunch Speaker 0: of businesses and police. Speaker 2: K? So I'm not gonna buy into that garbage. I'm going to get back to the good free enterprise economics where businesses get ahead by having the best product, not by having the best lobbyists. Workers keep more of their wages. Government gets out of people's hair, off their back, and out of their way. Speaker 0: No one disagrees with any of those things. Like, as you can see. Speaker 1: This is what and Speaker 2: I'm the only Speaker 1: one that Speaker 0: can do that. You implement them. That's the last Speaker 2: time you're here. I gotta win. Speaker 0: I'm I'll vote for you. I'll give you I'll give you a try. Speaker 2: I gotta win. Speaker 0: But it's one of those things. I'm it's a pessimistic vote. Speaker 2: The day after the day after the election, you're gonna have 1 or 2 people be prime minister. You're You're gonna have the guy who admires the basic Chinese Communist dictatorship where you're gonna have the Speaker 0: Yeah. The I get that. Speaker 1: It's it's 2 two options. Speaker 0: Pretty good with that. Oh, I Speaker 2: get that. That's pretty
liz_churchill10
Posted - November 12, 2024 at 2:46 AM
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 3:54 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

FOR THE RECORD, Canada’s next Prime Minister is a GLOBALIST TRAITOR. He’s controlled opposition that has ruined the lives of SO MANY CANADIANS with his UN, WHO Policies. https://t.co/VioKD9NUhz

wideawake_media
Posted - February 28, 2025 at 11:31 AM
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 2:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on Mark Carney, a potential replacement for Justin Trudeau, who emphasizes the need to achieve Net Zero to stabilize the climate. One participant criticizes Carney, labeling him a globalist and suggesting that his stance on reducing carbon emissions equates to a threat to Canadians, framing it as a "war on the flesh." The response expresses alarm, accusing Carney of being a mass murderer for advocating policies aimed at reducing carbon, which they argue would harm people.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Justin Trudeau's potential replacement, ex-central banker Mark Carney: "We can't stabilise the climate unless we get to Net Zero." 🤡 https://t.co/79QWacNoLc

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's good that environmental, social, and governance (ESG) labels face scrutiny and healthy skepticism. This is a key reason we are so focused on net zero. We can't stabilize the climate without achieving net zero; it's that simple. Emissions either increase or decrease. If decreasing, are they doing so at a rate consistent with scientific findings? We're basing our approach on the same science that the UN and others use for their one-and-a-half-degree objectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. There is some stress, and it's great that there is that it's not great that it happens, but it's great that there's that scrutiny, and there's that skepticism or healthy skepticism about ESG labels or sustainable labels. And it, again, is one of the reasons we're having this ruthless, relentless focus on net zero because in the end, look, we can't stabilize the climate unless we get to net zero. And it's as simple. These are hard numbers. Your emissions are either a or b. They're going up or down. And if they're going down, are they going down consistent with the science? We anchor it in the science, the same science the UN and others use for the one and half degree objectives.

@FinalTelegraph - Saggezza Eterna

@wideawake_media Mark Carney is a globalist. What's in a name? Mark Carney means War on the Flesh. He's talking about killing Canadians. People are made of carbon. Mark wants to get rid of carbon, ie net zero. Wake up. Canadians are dealing with an unhinged mass murderer.

wideawake_media
Posted - February 28, 2025 at 11:31 AM
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 2:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers around Justin Trudeau's potential successor, Mark Carney, who emphasizes the need to achieve Net Zero to stabilize the climate. In response, another participant references Dr. Patrick Moore, an early Greenpeace figure, who claims there is no definitive scientific proof linking CO2 to the slight warming observed over the past 300 years. They suggest watching a video that conveys this message.

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

Justin Trudeau's potential replacement, ex-central banker Mark Carney: "We can't stabilise the climate unless we get to Net Zero." 🤡 https://t.co/79QWacNoLc

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's scrutiny and healthy skepticism around ESG and sustainable labels, which is actually a good thing. It's why we're so focused on net zero. Stabilizing the climate requires us to reach net zero; it's that simple. We're dealing with hard numbers: emissions either increase or decrease. If they're decreasing, are they doing so at a rate consistent with scientific targets? Our approach is rooted in the same science used by the UN and others for the 1.5-degree objectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. There is some stress, and it's great that there is that it's not great that it happens, but it's great that there's that scrutiny, and there's that skepticism or healthy skepticism about ESG labels or sustainable labels. And it, again, is one of the reasons we're having this ruthless, relentless focus on net zero because in the end, look, we can't stabilize the climate unless we get to net zero. And it's as simple. These are hard numbers. Your emissions are either a or b. They're going up or down. And if they're going down, are they going down consistent with the science? We anchor it in the science, the same science the UN and others use for the one and half degree objectives.

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@wideawake_media Greenpeace early principle, Dr. Patrick Moore: "There is no definitive scientific proof that CO2 is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last 300 years.” Watch this video for important message https://t.co/M8wRYUByma

@wdunlap - Wayne Dunlap

@catturd2 Greenpeace early principle, Dr. Patrick Moore: "There is no definitive scientific proof that CO2 is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last 300 years.” Watch this video for important message: https://t.co/ze61ilKKBx

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have stated publicly that there's no definitive scientific proof, through real-world observation, that carbon dioxide is responsible for the slight warming of the global climate over the last three hundred years. If such proof existed through testing and replication, it would be documented for everyone to see. The idea that human emissions are the dominant influence on climate is just a hypothesis, not a universally accepted scientific theory. Therefore, skepticism is warranted when people claim the science is settled. However, it is certain that CO2 is essential for all life on Earth, and without enough of it in the atmosphere, the planet would be dead. Yet, our children are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As I've stated publicly on many occasions, there is no definitive scientific proof through real world observation that carbon dioxide is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last three hundred years since the peak of the little ice age. If there were such a proof, through testing and replication, it would have been written down for all of us to see. The contention that human emissions are now the dominant influence on climate is simply a hypothesis rather than a universally accepted scientific theory. It is therefore correct, indeed, verging on the compulsory in the scientific tradition, to be skeptical of those who express certainty that the science is settled and the debate is over. But there is certainty beyond a reasonable doubt that CO two is the building block for all life on earth and that without its presence in the global atmosphere at sufficient concentration, this would be a dead planet. Yet today, our children and our publics are taught that c o two is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees.
amuse
Posted - March 10, 2025 at 11:18 AM
Saved - March 10, 2025 at 12:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about Canada’s new Prime Minister Mark Carney, who was never elected and has no prior political experience. His ties to the WEF raise questions about his commitment to net zero carbon emissions and DEI, which I believe could harm the country.

@amuse - @amuse

DEMOCRACY? Canada’s new leader, Prime Minister Mark Carney, was never elected by the people. He has never received a single vote in his life and has never held elected office. A WEF globalist now rules Canada. https://t.co/HigSM4ABhG

@amuse - @amuse

DEMOCRACY? Canada’s new unelected prime minister was installed by the WEF to ensure Canada reaches net zero carbon emissions. This will cripple Canada. https://t.co/DHjGHpD4wG

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's skepticism about ESG and sustainable labels, which is why we're focused on net zero. We can't stabilize the climate without achieving it. It's simple: emissions either increase or decrease. If they're decreasing, are they doing so in line with scientific standards? We're basing this on the same science used by the UN and others for the 1.5-degree objectives. These are hard numbers, not subjective opinions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Skepticism about ESG labels or sustainable labels. And that, again, is one of the reasons we're having this ruthless, relentless focus on net zero because in the end, look, we can't stabilize the climate unless we get to net zero. And it's as simple. These are hard numbers. Your emissions are either a or b. They're going up or down. And if they're going down, are they going down consistent with the science? We anchor it in the science, the same science the UN and others use for the one and half degree objectives.

@amuse - @amuse

DEMOCRACY? Canada’s new unelected ruler makes it clear he is committed to DEI. https://t.co/lMov3iJ954

Video Transcript AI Summary
America is currently consumed by a cultural fever, but Canada will remain committed to its core values. As the United States battles against woke culture, we in Canada will continue to prioritize and champion inclusiveness.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a fever gripping America. And while it rages, Canadians will remain resolute and true to our values. While America engages in a war on woke, Canadians will continue to value inclusiveness.
View Full Interactive Feed