TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @print3_d

VGircys
Posted - July 25, 2024 at 12:01 AM
Saved - July 25, 2024 at 4:18 PM

@VGircys - Vincent Gircys

Never stop posting. We will never forget.

@RealMattA_ - Matt Alexander

Remember when the police stole the gas cans from the truckers at the Freedom Convoy? I do. They tried to 'siege' the truckers into submission by starving them of heat in the dead of winter. Ottawa residents helped solve that problem. LOST FREEDOM FILES # 886 🇨🇦🚛👇🔊🔊👇🚛🇨🇦 https://t.co/cPpUxhswrT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses cops of taking Jerry cans, possibly to prevent truckers from having heat at night. They believe it would be difficult to return the cans after a court ruling against it. The speaker questions the cops' intentions and suggests they want truckers to suffer in the cold.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Taking more Jerry cans. Cops stealing more cans. Cops stealing more cans. Cops stealing more cans. I don't even think they have the names on those cans. It'd be very hard to give them back after the court had already told they can't take them. But now the cops like the Gary Cans. Wanna make sure the truckers don't have enough heat so they can freeze at night. Yeah. Sure. No.
MichelleRempel
Posted - September 22, 2017 at 12:46 PM
Saved - May 25, 2024 at 1:36 AM

@MichelleRempel - Michelle Rempel Garner

Starting my final day at #UNGA2017 with @wef Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab and members of @YGLvoices @GlobalShapers communities https://t.co/KAFjdSIcWf

print3_d
Posted - May 22, 2024 at 5:20 PM
Saved - May 22, 2024 at 5:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The official donation wallets for the Freedom Convoy 2022 have been shared. On-chain analysis shows that less than $400 in BTC was donated and the wallet is now empty. There is a fundraising goal of 100 BCH for the convoy. A backup of the donation address has been provided to prevent deletion.

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

The official Freedom Convoy 2022 donation wallets. If anyone wants to look into the on chain analysis. #freedomconvoy2022 #truckerconvoy2022 #peoplesconvoy2022 I can see that less than 400$ in BTC was donated and wallet is now empty. @dave8988

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

Almost there! Only 10 $BCH to go to 100 BCH goal. Nice work @metapills! 👏 Unstoppable fundraising for #FreedomConvoy2022 with bitcoin cash 🚚🇨🇦🚛🇨🇦🚚🇨🇦🚛🇨🇦 Donate via flipstarter to https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Or see direct donation addresses below

Freedom Convoy - Cheaper And Develops Faster Bitcoin was introduced in the year 2009 and it was well-received in the market. However, there are some issues with Bitcoins. freedomconvoy.cash

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

Link to the original reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/skyfuy/flipstarter_bitcoin_cash_for_the_freedom_convoy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Backup of the address in case someone in government tries to delete https://web.archive.org/web/20221207203958/https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/skyfuy/flipstarter_bitcoin_cash_for_the_freedom_convoy/

From the btc community on Reddit 28 votes, 175 comments. Flipstarter: https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Direct donation: BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC… reddit.com
r/btc - Flipstarter: Bitcoin Cash for the Freedom Convoy Direct donation: BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC: bc1qw9aas8590yak6utmzks2fa8un65zkhxv4f87p6 ETH … web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

@reseeit save thread.

maplesyrupsuckr
Posted - February 9, 2022 at 3:23 PM
Saved - May 22, 2024 at 5:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
We're almost there! Just 10 BCH left to reach our goal of 100 BCH for #FreedomConvoy2022. Donate via flipstarter or find direct donation addresses below. Let's keep the fundraising going to bypass censorship and restore freedom. #bitcoincash #crypto

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

Almost there! Only 10 $BCH to go to 100 BCH goal. Nice work @metapills! 👏 Unstoppable fundraising for #FreedomConvoy2022 with bitcoin cash 🚚🇨🇦🚛🇨🇦🚚🇨🇦🚛🇨🇦 Donate via flipstarter to https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Or see direct donation addresses below

Freedom Convoy - Cheaper And Develops Faster Bitcoin was introduced in the year 2009 and it was well-received in the market. However, there are some issues with Bitcoins. freedomconvoy.cash

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

The #TruckersConvoy2022 $10MM GoFundMe money was seized by woke tech. @metapills started a @flipstartercash to bypass censors with #bitcoincash. Go contribute some #crypto. The honking will continue until freedom is restored. 🚛🚛🚛honk🚚🚚🚚honk🚛🚛🚛 https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/skyfuy/flipstarter_bitcoin_cash_for_the_freedom_convoy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

From the btc community on Reddit 28 votes, 175 comments. Flipstarter: https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Direct donation: BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC… reddit.com

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC: bc1qw9aas8590yak6utmzks2fa8un65zkhxv4f87p6 ETH: 0x74F1CA4989b1A63155aD51ec95318Bf188fCD5B1 DOGE: DAbFcoWtH2JQZ9dMa2nktWdeT5YA3aNRxu

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

XMR: 439k7Fez2VsWjNatLLZU3pF94tf7crpKvh9DfPywBqfY1yTas9J61anZ31vtMzsuBjjcHi8hEzZyHSGaGihyyyoFKAyeMuF

maplesyrupsuckr
Posted - February 5, 2022 at 5:25 AM
Saved - May 22, 2024 at 4:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Truckers Convoy 2022 GoFundMe money was seized by woke tech. @metapills started a @flipstartercash to bypass censors with Bitcoin Cash. Join the movement and contribute some crypto. Let's continue honking until freedom is restored. Throw some RTs to support @DavidShares, @CheapLightning, @EmergentReasons, @rogerkver, @KimDotcom, @zquestz, @realAlexWinter, @Timcast, and @jamieCrypto. Bitcoin Cash's censorship resistant funding platform is helping Canuck Truckers in the Convoy For Freedom 2022.

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

The #TruckersConvoy2022 $10MM GoFundMe money was seized by woke tech. @metapills started a @flipstartercash to bypass censors with #bitcoincash. Go contribute some #crypto. The honking will continue until freedom is restored. 🚛🚛🚛honk🚚🚚🚚honk🚛🚛🚛 https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/skyfuy/flipstarter_bitcoin_cash_for_the_freedom_convoy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

From the btc community on Reddit 28 votes, 175 comments. Flipstarter: https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Direct donation: BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC… reddit.com

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

Throw some RTs @DavidShares @CheapLightning @EmergentReasons @rogerkver @KimDotcom @zquestz @realAlexWinter @Timcast @jamieCrypto

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

@ezralevant @MaximeBernier @Timcast @KimDotcom @wikileaks @Timcast @jordanbpeterson @RubinReport #BitcoinCash's censorship resistant funding platform helping Canuck Truckers in #ConvoyForFreedom2022 https://t.co/2zwMXZx3yL

randyhillier
Posted - February 8, 2024 at 6:46 PM
Saved - May 19, 2024 at 9:51 PM

@randyhillier - Randy Hillier

Looks like the Ukraine stronghold of Avdeeka will surrender about the same time that the Putin-@TuckerCarlson interview will be broadcast and on the same day as Zelensky fired his top General. February 8th may become an international annual holiday to celebrate in years to come.

@GeromanAT - -- GEROMAN -- time will tell - 👀 --

Pro Ukrainian sources estimate the remaining AFU soldiers in Avdiivka at around 3000 men. "The situation in Avdeevka is very difficult; headquarters refused to withdraw units from the city despite Zaluzhny’s position. There are almost three thousand military personnel in Avdeevka; if the city is closed in a ring, this can lead to serious consequences." (my estimation was lower - after analysing the remaining area - knowing that only the 110th brigade is there effectively - I estimated the remaining troops at around 1500 to 2000 men - not including the coke plant) https://t.me/ZeRada1/18057

ЗеРада 🔥🔥Тактика малых котлов. Авдеевка. Азовсталь 2.0 Похоже русские опять применили свою любимую уловку 2022 года «тактику малых котлов», которую усилили комплексной тактикой подавления противника, отработанной под Бахмутом и Работино. После того как им не удалось внезапным массированным ударом обеспечить большой котёл вокруг Авдеевки, они сменили тактику. ВСУ тогда спешно перебросили резервы и даже сформировали в районе Селидово-Новогродовка ударный кулак. Вероятно, для прорыва возможного окружения. Однако, окружения не случилось. Прежде всего из-за отсутствия прорыва в районе Северного, что дало возможность сохранить логистику. Тем не менее, захват и удержание террикона на северном фасе Авдеевской удавки предопределили дальнейший ход событий. Серия последовательных ударов с разных направлений уменьшили ширину Авдеевского выступа. Также ВС РФ вели активную работу по лишению гарнизона техники: ✅ Позиции заливались «зажигалками», ✅ Путь подвоза постоянно подвергался обстрелам. Затем был прорыв в районе «Царской охоты», над которым смеялся весь украинский «патриотический» телеграм, но именно он стал решающим☝🏻 На ликвидацию прорыва были переброшены лучшие подразделения, которые были внутри города, что ослабило другие участки, а русские сразу провели удар с противоположной стороны через частный сектор. Для поддержания прорыва они отрубили Старлинк, а также полностью перенесли удары авиации с тыловых районов на подразделения, непосредственно участвующие в боевых действиях. На данный момент им остаётся около 500м до главной артерии - Индустриального проспекта. После чего подразделения, находящиеся в южной Авдеевке (район Химик) останутся в оперативном окружении. Да, останется дорога через поля, по которой с огромным риском, можно будет проводить москитную логистику. Однако уже сейчас по ней мало кто хочет ехать, подвоза практически нет. Однако, самая большая проблема не в том, что сложно будет обеспечить подвоз, а том, что невозможно будет обеспечить выход гарнизона. Эвакуации уже нет ☝🏻 t.me
DecentraliseP
Posted - May 18, 2024 at 12:35 PM
Saved - May 19, 2024 at 1:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of posts, the author discusses the termination of Project @X and the alleged trap of free speech. They claim that an actor named 'David Goldberg' was enlisted by the Chabad Mafia to reveal the agenda of exterminating "Antisemites" and then discredit himself later. The Jews are said to be collecting data on dissenters through various platforms, including the vaccine card system. The plan is to eliminate critical thinkers before the Messianic era. @X was supposedly purchased under the guise of free speech to attract dissidents and expose them using the Mossad verification system. The identity verification organization on @X is called "AU10TIX," whose CEO has ties to Shin Bet's unit 8200. The author also mentions that Saudi Royals are significant investors in @X after Elon Musk's takeover and suggests they are Sabbateans. The question of whether Musk is aware or involved is left to the reader's interpretation.

@DecentraliseP - Decentralise Party

‼️Project @X termination‼️ ‼️@X Free Speech Trap‼️ ‼️TTID (Tag, Track, ID)‼️ In 2019, Chabad Mafia enlisted an actor under the alias 'David Goldberg'. He was tasked to tell the truth about the agenda to exterminate "Antisemites", then discredit himself in a later interview to make the original claim appear falsified. The Jews are collecting data using various platforms to isolate dissenters, they also used the vaccine card system to collect data on 'antivaxxers' who they knew would also become 'antisemites', being a group of virtue this was a seamless transition for 'antivaxxers'. Their plan is to exterminate all critical thinkers before the Messianic era. @X was purchased under the guise of "Free Speech" to draw in dissidents and use the Mossad verification system to expose them. The organisation that handles identity verification on X is known as "AU10TIX". Ron Atzomn, the CEO of AU10TIX, served in Shin Bet's unit 8200. Saudi Royals are the second largest investors in @X after Musk takeover. They are Sabbateans. Is Elon Musk aware of this, even part of it? You decide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
They plan to tag, track, and identify individuals through blackouts. Projects Pogo and ZYPHR involve agents sharing truthful information to monitor viewers online. Project Xyther will lead to extermination, possibly through charges or viral attacks like guillotines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're going to exterminate these people 1 by 1 through the blackouts. I mean, it it says in the class of the documents a plan to pick them up. They're just going to physically pick them up. They call it tag track and ID. It is a term used throughout the documents, TTID. It's something you wanna remember. This is very, common throughout these documents that I refer to all the time. So what does that tell you? They wanna tag, they want to track you, and they want to identify who you are. If you are watching these channels, if you are informed, if you are awake on these issues, they wanna tag you, they want to track you, and they want to know exactly who you are. They want to know and, it talks about the tracking people's IP addresses through YouTube. They have access to YouTube. They do know who you are. So this is discussed a lot in the documents. I'm just looking through it right now. And there are 2 projects, and it's very important to to listen to this. Project Pogo is one of them, and Project ZYPHR. I will spell that one, zyphr. Project Pogo and Project Zeiffer are the 2 projects that the classified documents are how they are all agents. They're all paid to put out truthful information so that they can tag, track, and ID the people that are watching the videos and giving them likes and giving them comments. They're tracking all of it. Project Xyther is a different project and that's what I'll talk about in a bit. That is the second stage here. That is coming up, and that is the extermination. They're going to exterminate these people, whether it is tag them for anti Semitic speech, charge them with crimes, eliminate them completely, and this is where I'll talk about in the documents where they talk about guillotines, viral attacks targeted, how they're going to eliminate these people without too much suspicion, without too many people noticing.
QueenOfDiagolon
Posted - April 26, 2024 at 6:55 PM
Saved - April 28, 2024 at 2:44 AM

@QueenOfDiagolon - MorganMayhem 🇨🇦

https://t.co/N904n8JBdJ

MichelleRempel
Posted - January 24, 2018 at 5:23 PM
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 6:37 PM

@MichelleRempel - Michelle Rempel Garner

A fun read from @Moniquescotti

@moniquescotti - Monique Scotti

A look at #wef18's crazy micro-economy, featuring $75 burger platters and @MichelleRempel's "ham sammich" https://globalnews.ca/news/3979871/davos-wef-economy-rich-shops-afford-meal/ #Davos2018

As the rich move into Davos, the cost of a hamburger platter hits $75 - National | Globalnews.ca The World Economic Forum draws business moguls, celebrities and political elites from around the globe. And they don't balk at a $75 hamburger platter. globalnews.ca
DivergeMedia_
Posted - November 22, 2020 at 4:53 PM
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 6:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A list of influential Canadians on the forum for young global leaders created by Klaus Schwab was shared, raising concerns about Canadian sovereignty. The list includes government officials, party leaders, and Supreme Court members. The forum aims to drive positive change in the world through public-private cooperation. The connection between Michelle Rempel and the forum is questioned. The article promises to provide more details on the topic.

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

Here's the list of all Canadian's in a position of influence who are on the forum for young global leaders created by #WorldEconomicForum founder #KlausSchwab ... Like and share the crap out if this - Canada has a big problem!!!

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

All names of those included; 1.Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister of Canada @cafreeland 2.Francois Philippe Champagne, Minister of Foreign Affairs 3.Brian Gallant, Leader of New Brunswick Liberal Party @BrianGallantNB

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

4.Terry Beech, department of fisheries, oceans and Canadian coast guard @terrybeech 5.Ailish Campbell, Chief Trade Commisoner, Global affairs Canada @Ailish_Campbell 6.Michelle Rempel Garner (conservatives) @MichelleRempel 7. NDP leader Jagmeet Singh @theJagmeetSingh

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

8.Renee Maria Tremblay, Supreme Court Of Canada, Senior counsel 9.Elissa Golberg - Minister for strategic policy, Global Affairs Canada 10.Karina Gould - Minister of International Development, Global Affairs Canada @karinagould

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

11. Melanie Joly - Minister of economic development and official languages, science and economic development @melaniejoly 12.Maryam Monsef - ministry for women , Gender equality and rural economic development @MaryamMonsef

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

These are the people in charge of our country with direct ties to the #GreatReset through Klaus Schwabs #WorldEconomicForum initiative the forum for young global leaders. Like and share far and wide - this is a direct threat to Canadian sovereignty!

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

"The mission of the Forum of Young Global Leaders is to create a dynamic global community of exceptional people with the vision, courage and influence to drive positive change in the world." What's the positive change as imagined by #KlausSchwab @MichelleRempel ?

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

"Aligned with the World Economic Forum’s mission, we seek to spur public-private cooperation amongst these unique actors to demonstrate entrepreneurship in the global public interest." Why does Michelle belong to this again? @MichelleRempel @CPC_HQ

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

"YGLs are active in today’s most exciting and dynamic fields, from the circular economy to digital governance. Their common denominator is a desire to contribute in entrepreneurial ways to the global public interest, building on the World Economic Forum’s legacy."

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

Tune in tonight at 830PM eastern time as we explore all of this in great detail. It will NOT BE SOMETHING you want to miss! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfFinbLbEWg

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

We exposed all 3 parties ties to the great reset - let's keep diving. What if I could prove this organization (young global leaders) also has ties to @BillGates Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? I CAN. https://www.younggloballeaders.org/

The Forum of Young Global Leaders younggloballeaders.org

@DivergeMedia_ - Diverge Media

Heres Our article detailing all these findings! https://divergemedia.ca/2020/11/23/great-reset-has-almost-all-political-parties-working-together-canada/

The Great Reset – Liberals, Conservatives, NDP all involved and seem to be working together towards SDG’S The following is a Diverge Media investigative piece. divergemedia.ca
MarilynGladuSL
Posted - December 9, 2022 at 2:18 AM
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 3:17 PM

@MarilynGladuSL - Marilyn Gladu

We voted for all the COVID supports , so again the Liberals are lying ! However about the billions in taxpayer funded benefits paid to those that are dead or in prison …. Maybe the government should look into it ?????

@MarkGerretsen - Mark Gerretsen 🇨🇦 🇺🇦

Thankfully, we only have to imagine how Dan and Conservatives would have abandoned Canadians during a once-in-a-lifetime global pandemic. #cdnpoli https://t.co/MtK01nhOow

MarkFriesen08
Posted - September 22, 2023 at 5:52 PM
Saved - April 15, 2024 at 4:09 PM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

#Agenda2030 and what it means to YOU! And who’s who in the political zoo. https://t.co/EA6UQwLMcV

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, Mulrooney and Harper committed Canada to Agenda 2030 without informing the public. This agenda, created by foreign entities, aims to control all aspects of life and erode individual rights. Mainstream parties in Canada support this agenda, except for the PPC and some provincial parties. The World Economic Forum serves as a support mechanism for this globalist agenda, consolidating power in the UN. Multinational corporations are coerced into compliance through ESG requirements, leading to corruption. Rejecting Agenda 2030 is crucial to preserving rights, freedoms, and sovereignty. It's time to be aware and take action.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Just a couple of questions I need to ask. In 1992, when your conservative prime minister, Brian Mulrooney, went to Rio de Janeiro to commit Canadians to an agenda created by an unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. Did he return to Canada and task all of his MPs to go do town halls to explain to the people what it is he committed to? Did that ever happen? No. The exact opposite happened. They framed it as a conspiracy theory so that you wouldn't pay attention and so they could dismiss people like me. It's reality now. Did Stephen Harper task all of his MPs after he signed it in 2015. And prior to that, he made it law in this country with the Sustainability Act. And after he did that, did he task his MPs to go back to their constituents and tell them about what they've committed to and what law they created, making it binding in this country. Where we're now compelled as a government in this country to report our progress in achieving the goals of sustainable development to an unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. Did they explain that to any of you? No, they didn't. In 2015, when Harper signed again agenda 2030, September 27, 2015. Did he task all of his MPs to go back to their constituents and inform them of what they committed to? No, they didn't. And there's still people running around calling it a conspiracy theory, even though we all know it's reality. An agenda created again by an unelected unaccountable foreign entity hell bent on destroying Western civilization and everything that we cherish, and controlling everything that you do. Everything from the time you wake up in the morning to the time you go to bed, they wanna control it all through this agenda. Did any of them tell you about this? Did any of them of these MPs, these elected officials in parliament, go back to the constituents and inform the people of what this represents, what the consequences to this committing to this agenda really are. Did they do that? No, they haven't. They framed it as conspiracy theory because of people like myself, they need to dismiss. And when you talk about SOGI, it's completely connected. This agenda was first conceptualized in 1968 through funding by the Rockefellers, by the Rothschilds, by the Warburgs, and the ships, all the big bankers, because they want to centralize all control within the UN. Look what the World Health Organization is doing. They wanna dictate to you health policy. And our politicians in this country, all of them are on board with it, including the Conservative Party of Canada. The Conservative Party of Canada is the only party in this country that is committed to that agenda. And then they pass the baton onto the liberals to implement it. That's how this all comes together. I encourage you to look at my pinned tweet. Dennis Meadows, founding member of the club of Rome, and what he says on my pinned tweet, and what this all represents. All of this is about control, controlling all aspects of your life. That's what this agenda represents. They want control. They've ceded our sovereignty to, again, an unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. And is there policy in the conservative party platform that denounces agenda 2030? No. Is there policy in the Sask parties policy package that denounces agenda 2030? No. There's one party in Saskatchewan that has it in their policy to reject agenda 2030. There's 1 federal party in Canada that has it in their policy to reject agenda 2030, And that's the PPC. That's it. There is no other option. If you continue to support the only party that's ever committed us to this agenda, then you're setting our country up for enormous failure. That's gonna be on you. This agenda, as I've said, is meant to control all aspects of your life and take individual rights and throw them out the window. That's what this agenda represents. It's hyper centralization of control and power into the UN. And understand, when Pierre Polovera denounces the World Economic Forum, understand this. When this agenda was first conceptualized in the late sixties, they tapped Klaus Schwab to create the World Economic Forum in 1971 As a support mechanism for the greater agenda. The World Economic Forum is not the pinnacle of this globalist agenda. The UN is, Which is why they're attempting to consolidate power through the World Health Organization. And through this agenda. That's where the power is going to lie. If we continue to allow these politicians to continue to seed our sovereignty to this unelected, unaccountable foreign entity. It's time to wake up. It's time to understand who's who in the zoo. None of these parties have denounced agenda 2030 on a formal basis with with party policy. None of them, and they won't. This is the loss of your rights, your freedoms, your prosperity, your liberty, your freedoms, rule of law. The corruption is running rampant because what they've done through the World Economic Forum, excuse me, is they've managed to co opt multinational corporations who require capital to run their operations. In order to get their capital, they have to employ this ESG, environmental social governance. That's the only way they're gonna get capital from the people like BlackRock. That's the corruption that we're seeing. And there isn't a party other than the Buffalo party and the PPC, and maybe the the BC Conservatives that has the denouncement and rejection of agenda 2030 built
FringeViews
Posted - April 7, 2024 at 6:42 PM
Saved - April 8, 2024 at 9:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: Zach Voorhies is being called out for supporting doxing, which is illegal and against platform terms. The author also suggests that Zach may be an intel asset himself, making his accusations ironic. Post 2: The author shares a video clarifying their statements about TWC affiliates. They believe that Zach Voorhies and his group have engaged in doxxing, harassment, and defamation, labeling them as a vicious cult.

@FringeViews - Polly St George, Deep State Asset gone rogue ;)

Read this and tell me what a nice guy Zach Voorhies is. "They have every right to dox you" he says. It's literally illegal & against platform terms. PS he's likely an intel asset himself so it is hilarious for him to call me a Fedposter. 😂 Oh the lies he tells, especially in DM https://t.co/93LkL3kRBK

@FringeViews - Polly St George, Deep State Asset gone rogue ;)

here's the video of *exactly* what I said about the TWC affiliates. For Zach Voorhies @Perpetualmaniac, this justifies the doxxing, harassment and defamation heaped on me by this group. They are a vicious cult. https://t.co/a5HoUKoTxd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some affiliates of this network may be influenced by sponsorships from a wellness company, potentially compromising their message due to financial incentives. It is unclear how much money they make or if they are aware of the company's true intentions. The speaker does not accuse them of wrongdoing, but questions the impact of these affiliations on the information they share.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one more caveat before I begin. I am not trying to say that the people who are affiliates of this network, the people whose shows have gotten sponsorships with the wellness company to sell emergency kits or whatever it is they sell. I am not saying that they are part of this in terms of knowing what's going on in the background. However, I am saying that whatever the money is like from these sponsorships and affiliate relationships could indeed compromise their message. Because let's face it. I don't know how much these people are making. I couldn't get anybody to talk about that. But these are tough economic times, and some of these accounts are pretty small. Maybe that affiliate relationship ends up being a good chunk of their monthly income. I have no idea. Okay? I am not saying that these people are bad or that they give out all bad information or that they even know what the wellness company is really all about. In fact, I don't know what the wellness company is really all about, but we're gonna get into that right now. K.
jakeshieldsajj
Posted - April 3, 2024 at 4:23 PM
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 12:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm facing backlash for sharing pictures from Auschwitz, but I stand by the official story. It's concerning that 30 governments would imprison those who question, as we rely on them to always act in our best interest. The lawmakers behind these laws are also unlikely to be dishonest.

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

People are trying to get me banned from Twitter for this post I'm simply posting the pictures from Auschwitz I 100% believe the official story 30 governments will jail you for asking questions and we know governments always have our best interest Ziomest who pass these laws also would never lie

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

These are actual photos from The gas chambers in Auschwitz death camps The nazi technology was extremely advanced and decades ahead of modern gas chambers https://t.co/vBCT84iCBg

ic911justice
Posted - April 1, 2024 at 8:21 PM
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 3:27 PM

@ic911justice - International Center for 9/11 Justice

It's now 15 years since the publication of the landmark nano-thermite paper by Niels Harrit et al — and still no defender of the official 9/11 story has come forward to refute it in a scientific journal. Their silence speaks volumes. https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

Bentham Open ArchivesTwitterSM-FacebookSM-Youtube benthamopenarchives.com
LizCrokin
Posted - March 24, 2024 at 11:10 PM
Saved - March 24, 2024 at 11:33 PM

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

I exposed pedophilia in Hollywood — including Disney and Nickelodeon — in my Britney Spears documentary Slave Princess. Bella Thorne, Amanda Bynes and many others have blown the whistle on Pedowood. Watch the full documentary below. 👇🏻 @SlavePrincess_ https://t.co/eg5MA7uWhZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Britney's story sheds light on Hollywood's corruption and abuse. Disney hired a convicted child rapist to direct a film, and James Gunn faced backlash for inappropriate comments. Bella Thorne and Christina Aguilera also spoke out about abuse in the industry. Other stars like Mena Suvari and Paris Hilton shared their experiences of mistreatment. The industry's culture of silence allows abusers to escape consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If there was one good thing to come out of Britney's tragic story, it's that national attention is now focused on the hideous underbelly of Hollywood and the systemic corruption and abuse of the entertainment industry as a whole. Young stars who came up with Britney have spoken out about the abuse they suffered at the hands of powerful industry executives. Disney should have been the safest place for aspiring child entertainers looking for a dream, but it became one of the worst offenders instead. The media giant's disturbing track molesters or people with a history of dangerous behavior towards children is well documented. Disney hired convicted child rapist Victor Salba to direct the film Powder. Speaker 1: In a city where dreams are made, fame can come at a price. Speaker 2: My first memory of when the abuse started and, you know, eventually progressed over the next 5 years. Videotape all of it. I mean, it was it was full blown. Speaker 1: When they found out, Nathan's family went to the police and Salva was convicted and jailed, but that hasn't affected his Hollywood career. Powder, one Speaker 3: of the scripts he wrote in prison, was distributed by Disney's Buena Vista Pictures. Speaker 0: The company claims they did not know Salvo was a convicted pedophile until after the production started, but then refused to fire him even after they learned of the crime. Speaker 2: And big names in Hollywood have been backing him throughout the entire process. It just seems like there's, like, an exclusive club, and Victor's a part of that club. Speaker 0: In 2018, Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn received nationwide condemnation for shocking comments he posted on social media, in which he made light of child sexual abuse. He was fired after intense public pressure. Speaker 4: The offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James' Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio's values, and we have severed our business relationship with him. Speaker 0: But then, Disney once again demonstrate their indifference by hiring him back as soon as the issue had faded from the news. Speaker 1: Hollywood might not like talking about it, but it doesn't take a lot of digging to find even more examples of how it often has selective amnesia when it comes to some of the past behavior of those it chooses to welcome into the fold. Speaker 0: One of the more shocking revelations was a 2 2017 report revealing 35 Disney employees had been arrested for child sex crimes since 2006. In 2004, The New York Times revealed a highly coordinated child trafficking syndicate at Disneyland, where victims would be identified with yellow dresses before being picked up and sold to organized criminals. I'm Bele Thorpe from, shake it up, and you're watching Disney Channel. Bella Thorne, another Disney star just like Britney, has openly discussed the abuse she endured as a child performer in the Hollywood system and explained how everyone saw but said nothing. Speaker 5: Getting molested for from your 6 to your 14 seems like way harder circumstances or being physically abused all the time seems like a much more difficult situation than you have paparazzi following you since you were 12. I was still being molested when paparazzi were still following me, but having no idea the type of mistreatment that I was still dealing with at that time, that everyone around me saw and did nothing. Speaker 0: The pattern of entertainment companies targeting talented children of vulnerable parents can be seen in the case of another former Mickey Mouse club star, Christina Aguilera. She was abused by her father. Her mother, Shelley Kearns, counts finding Christina as a child with blood on her face after her dad punished her. And I go upstairs. I miss my 4 year old girl. She has blood going down her chin. Former child movie star, Mina Sabari, recently opened up about the abuse she sustained in the industry. Speaker 3: Laced throughout her stories of sexual abuse through a series of bad relationships. You described at 12 losing your virginity against your will, essentially. Mhmm. Speaker 0: A part of me died that day for sure. As well as an inappropriate encounter with alleged pedophile Kevin Spacey on the set of American Beauty. Longtime Britney Powell, Paris Hilton, detailed abuse she suffered at the Provo Canyon School in her documentary, This is Paris. Speaker 6: And during a deposition hearing Children were restrained, hit, thrown into walls, strangled, and sexually abused regularly at Provo. I was verbally, mentally, and physically abused on a daily basis. I was cut off from the outside world and stripped of all of my human rights. I could not report this because all communication with my family was monitored and censored. This is unconstitutional, degrading, and terrifying. Speaker 0: Singer Kaia Jones said the Pussigat Dolls was a prostitution ring, Rudolph, was the, quote, den mother from hell. Speaker 3: Today, I wanna talk about a controversial topic, Speaker 6: my conservatorship case. Speaker 0: Amanda Bynes, who is also in a controversial conservatorship, tweeted she was sexually abused by her father, but then took the comment back. She worked alongside Dan Schneider at Nickelodeon who resigned after several allegations of abuse and very inappropriate behavior surfaced. Underpinning every one of these reported instances of abuse is the code of silence that governs the industry. These rules of secrecy are so strictly upheld that powerful abusers have been able to perpetrate their sickening crimes with total immunity for their entire careers.

@SlavePrincess_ - Slave Princess

Slithering snake @HarveyLevinTMZ and his fake news factory @TMZ is still running cover for the human trafficking front that is #Britney's fraudulent conservatorship. See full #SlavePrincess doc that tells her story and exposes the rotten underbelly of the entertainment industry. https://t.co/Lh4NItscVR

Video Transcript AI Summary
A young woman named Britney Spears has been forced to perform since she was a child. She is under a conservatorship, and there are conspiracy theories that she is being held against her will. Some believe the conservatorship is necessary for her health, while others think it is a way to control her and her money. There are allegations of abuse and manipulation within the industry. Britney's family, including her parents, have been complicit in her situation. The media and legal system have worked to silence those who advocate for her freedom. This case sheds light on the corruption and abuse that can occur in the entertainment industry.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Imagine you're a 25 year old young woman who has been forced to perform since as long as she can walk. Speaker 1: She would love for new eyes to see her situation. But if she brings it up, she's constantly threatened that the conservators will take her kids away. Speaker 2: There's a whole conspiracy going around that Britney Spears is being held against her will. Speaker 3: Maybe she is needing a conservatorship, and maybe her dad is helping, and these conspiracy theories are getting out of control. Speaker 4: That idea that Britney is a puppet who just gets moved around and told what to do is incredibly inaccurate. Speaker 2: It seems obvious that both Jamie and Lynn want her to get better. The conservatorship is in place to keep her healthy. Speaker 5: Raising children, doing all these tours, doing all these concerts, someone who needs conservatorship is mentally incapacitated, and she has proven to do the opposite. People manipulate young women. They manipulate kids. It's dark and demonic energy that this industry was built on. Speaker 6: Making anyone work against their will, taking all their possessions away, credit card, cash, phone, passport, the only similar thing to this is called sex trafficking. Speaker 7: I have, Speaker 8: like, certain people in the my life that were that were just bad people, and I was very guarded at first, but then I went to a point where I ended up letting them in because I was lonely or whatever the fact, and I really paid the consequences for Speaker 9: that. Speaker 10: So I used to work as an entertainment journalist, and I covered Britney Spears for many years. I worked for Us Weekly Magazine, for In Touch Weekly Magazine. I had my own column in the red eye edition of the Chicago Tribune. I have been sent to Kentwood, Louisiana many times to cover Britney. I've met Kevin Federline. I've met Jason Alexander. I've met several people that are close to Britney Spears. Even before her conservatorship, it was very clear that she was surrounded by people she couldn't trust, that she was manipulated, that she was too controlled. Even before she was taken to a mental facility and put into a 5150 hold, it was very clear that Britney Spears was the victim of some kind of abuse. Speaker 11: Mom and dad are my biggest fans. They love it when I sing even more than I do. They tell me how to sacrifice, work hard, and never miss an audition. I owe them everything, and everything is just as it should Speaker 5: be. Speaker 7: Once upon a time in a land far, far away, there lived a beautiful girl named Britney. She could sing, dance, and do gymnastics, and everybody in the town loved listening to her perform. She would excel in everything she did, and to the outside world, she seemed to have it all. But home laugh was a hot mess. Britney's family were very poor. Her mom, Lynn, said they often had to rob Peter to pay Paul just to get by. Britney's dad, Jamie, had a really hard time getting his hands on money. After a long time of financial instability and a string of failed businesses, Jamie filed for bankruptcy. Lynn threatened to divorce him many times when Britney was just a kid. Then there were rumors that Jamie was messing around on Lynn, and it was no secret he loved to shut up that Pepsi Max. Sometimes when Jamie was in a drunken rage, things got pretty rough. This one time, he got his juice up as cooter brown and tried to drive off with Britney when she was just 5 years old. Uncle Willie tried to reach down and grab the keys, but he got punched up instead, all while Britney was hysterical and crying in the back seat. One time, Jamie came home totally wasted and called Lynn a very naughty word. Then he grabbed her glass of water and threw it across the room. This became just a normal day in the Spears' home. But then Britney became a rich, famous, and beautiful Speaker 10: Britney grew up in the small town of Kentwood, Louisiana and worked very hard as a young child to make it as a star. She started dance lessons at the fragile age of 3. Still today, her concerts are packed with adoring fans from all over Speaker 9: the world. Speaker 10: Unaware they are complicit in a sinister and potentially criminal set of circumstances that have been playing out behind the scenes since it all began. In recent years, passionate fans have brought awareness to the now prevalent belief that Britney Spears is, at the very least, a victim of long term financial fraud by the very people who claim to have her best interest in mind. Britney told us in her own words during her July 14th court appearance that she had abandonment issues from her childhood and has always been scared of her father. Speaker 3: Poppstar said that there have been times in her life where she's been, quote, extremely scared of her dad. She wants him removed and charged with conservatorship abuse. Speaker 10: But just as things were nosediving for the Spears family, Britney crash landed into the hearts of 1,000,000 with her debut television appearance on Star Search. Speaker 2: 10th one Louisiana here is 10 year old Britney Spears. Speaker 10: Which then quickly led to her big break in 1992 as a cast member in the Mickey Mouse club alongside Justin Timberlake, Christina Aguilera, and Ryan Gosling. In a glittering cloud of showbiz fairy dust, she broke through her small town southern ceiling and headed for the bright lights of LA filled with all the hope and possibility in the world. But dragged along in the jet stream who were already plotting to lay claim to her future estate. While investigating the deeply concerning details of Britney's forced conservatorship, her loyal fans unwittingly stumbled down a horrifying rabbit hole. Few would ever suspect that her own family might eventually become willing participants in a sprawling, potentially criminal conspiracy involving financial fraud, medical malpractice, involuntary servitude, and forced labor leading all the way up to the upper echelons of Hollywood and Washington DC. Speaker 12: Oh, I just started with Lou Taylor. Speaker 10: Okay. So Lou Taylor is the CEO of a company called TriStar Sports and Entertainment. Speaker 9: The best piece of advice I ever got from a mentor was to just do you. I know that sounds cliche, but it's really not. Don't worry about what other people are saying, and don't worry about what other people are saying about you. And don't worry about what other people are saying about you. Speaker 10: Court records show that Lou Taylor is the one that was able to convince Jamie Spears into putting Britney into a conservatorship. She actually was serving as a spokesperson for Britney Spears after Britney was thrown in the psych ward for the second time. Speaker 13: Lou Taylor is the business manager for Britney Spears' father, mother, and younger sister, Jamie Lynn. Lou, good morning to you. Good morning, Meredith. Thanks for having me. Speaker 10: And what we also know, Michael Lohan and Courtney Love have come out, and they said that Lou Taylor tried to get them involved in conservatorships. Michael Lohan said that Lou Taylor wanted Lindsay Lohan to go into rehab as an excuse to get Lindsay Lohan into a conservatorship. Lou Taylor could then, in effect, control her and her money, which is exactly what she has done to Britney Spears. Speaker 5: Hi, Liz. Speaker 10: Hi. How are you? Wait. Hold on. Let me make sure I'm recording this. Speaker 9: Can you Speaker 10: explain how Lou Taylor conspired to get Lindsay under conservatorship without Lindsay even knowing what was happening? Speaker 5: I mean, she went behind Lindsay's back and tried to, you know, tried to befriend Lindsay's mom, Adena, my ex wife, the same way she did it with Britney's father. She does target the weakest link, so to speak. And, of course, what better time to do it than when someone's in rehab to say that they have issues and they can't take care of themselves? When in fact, even when Lindsay was in rehab, she was in a place where she could take care of herself. Speaker 14: You know, sometimes you just end up having people around when you're younger in this industry just to to have people there. Because you're always around people and then it get can get very lonely. Speaker 10: Because I was Lonely. How were you able to prevent them from getting her under conservatorship? Speaker 8: 5 Star Sports and Entertainment Group. How they enter into your call? Speaker 5: You know, I wanted information, and she couldn't provide that information. Any information she did provide was kinda deflected, and she went on to another subject. So she didn't address those the questions I asked. You know, Lindsay was always first and foremost my daughter, and that's all that mattered Speaker 9: to me. Speaker 5: I so I didn't have access to the finances. I never got a penny or wanted a penny. I just wanted her to be in a good place and surrounded by good people. The people that came around her and the friends and leading her in the wrong direction, you know, it was it was hard. If they're a kid, you have to really keep an eye on them. Keep that leash as tight as you can. I can't get into my situation, but the truth will come out. The things they've done are really, really wrong, and they can't face the truth. They're blinded by the money, and that's horrible. But, you know, it's, that's between them and god. Speaker 10: Courtney Love has called Lou Taylor out for trying to get her under some kind of a conservatorship that would in effect control Kurt Cobain's image and his music. Somebody posted on her Instagram page. Is it true that Lou Taylor, who planned the conservatorship for Britney with her father, wanted to put you in a conservatorship too? Courtney replied, short answer is yes. Lou did try for a mutated strain of a conservatorship. She made an attempt to control Kurt's name and likeness in all Nirvana songs, then sell the publishing by which time I'd be in a conservatorship or more likely dead. I was successful at blocking only Lou, but not her buddies. Her pack of wolves almost killed me and my only child. There's a pattern with Lou Taylor. She always seems to be around when there is a celebrity that is going through struggles, who happen to have parents who are vulnerable, whether it be their own problems with addiction or financial struggles. Britney's team use all kinds of intimidation tactics against Britney fans. Speaker 15: So earlier this week, Breathe Heavy posted Britney Spears fan Speaker 5: site, Speaker 10: Breathe Heavy, Speaker 15: If you're a Britney Spears fan, you're well aware of Lou Taylor's presence and her alleged ties into Britney Spears' legal counsel a demand letter stating that if I don't retract the story, that I could be entangled in a legal battle with her. So because I don't wanna be involved in any sort of legal drama with Taylor or general, I've decided to comply, and I'm going to issue an apology. Speaker 10: All Jordan did was report about what Courtney Love said. Instead of going after the mainstream media outlet that actually originally covered the story, she went after a young Britney fan because they knew that some of these fans didn't necessarily have the money to fight a lawsuit against these powerful people. Speaker 15: Even though I don't personally feel like I should have to, that apologies should come from a sincere place in your heart. But I also understand what's at stake and I'd rather just kind of keep things moving because there is a bigger picture here. Speaker 10: In July of 2011, just a few months after it was revealed, Lou Taylor was officially part of Britney's team. Britney's charity, the Britney Spears Foundation, was reportedly zeroed out. According to liquidation records, $50,000 went to the Lou Taylor Thai Charity, Mercy Ministries. Speaker 16: The Hillsong Church is trying to distance itself from claims it's linked to a group which abused young women seeking help to overcome mental problems. Speaker 17: Rhiannon signed up to Mercy Ministries suffering depression and seeking help. Instead, she says she became the victim of a bible cult Speaker 10: and held captive for 9 months. Lou and her husband, pastor Rob Taylor, have partnered with Mercy Ministries. They've helped the charity with financial funding, and they've been active participants in their events. When Lou represented supermodel Nikki Taylor, Nikki served as an honorary chair of Mercy Ministries. Let me add you. Let me mercy. Speaker 2: Oh, yeah. Speaker 10: Pastor Taylor's church, Calvary Chapel, even had mercy listed on their site as part of their missions. The charity, according to their own website, claims to help young women with struggles, including women who have been victims of sexual abuse and, ironically, sex trafficking. In 2009, the Australia Mercy Ministries chapter had to return a $120,000 for taking government aid from their patients while falsely claiming they used licensed therapists. One member of Australia's parliament called the organization a, quote, particularly bad example of a money making cult. It's highly disturbing that money was taken from Britney Spears' foundation and was transferred to a quote, unquote foundation that is linked to Lou Taylor and riddled with corruption and abuse claims that were so bad that they had to shut down chapters and rename the charity. Speaker 18: So I really should be studying for the bar exam right now, but I'm too obsessed with this free Britney stuff. So who do I send this to if I found all the original legal documents? July 10th 2020, I made my first free Britney video ever. A month and 2 days later, I found out Lou Taylor worked from 2 1,004 to 2013 at Stonebridge Investment Council. Lou Taylor became Britney Spears' business manager between those years. She was also responsible for reporting to the probate court of California what Britney's conservatorship estate was worth. There wasn't anybody really over her. She was handling pretty much all the financial aspects of Britney Spears' life while Lou Taylor was still an owner, manager, employee of, and registered investment advisor with Stonebridge. So she's kind of on both sides of this transaction, and there's really nobody above her checking her. You then have Jamie Lynn Spears as the trustee of Britney's SJB trust, which nobody even knew. Speaker 10: Court documents show Jamie Lynn is now trustee of the pop princess's estate and must ensure it's used to protect Britney's 2 children if she passes Speaker 19: away. Britney Spears has been trapped in a conservatorship for over 12 years, and she can't trust anyone around her. Not even her sister, Jamie Lynn Spears, who has been going behind her back and working with her allegedly crazy business manager, Lou m Taylor, to funnel some money from one of her barges trust to one of Lou m Taylor's business accounts. Well, it turns out in this filing, Jamie actually requested for the court to add Stonebridge Wealth Management to the trust. Why is this company that Lou M. Taylor is working for and a part of going into Britney's trust? Speaker 18: August 18th, Jamie Lynn Spears asked the court to move a 100% of the assets from Britney Trust. Her most valuable trust that was protecting all of her money, including cash, jewelry, clothing, cars. What they were trying to set the trust up to do, in my opinion, was to be able to operate completely free and clear of anything Britney Spears ever wanted. The way that that money would have moved would have been through Stonebridge Investment Council. Speaker 10: When BJ and Britney fans exposed the possible heist in progress, Jamie Lynn mysteriously reversed course and withdrew the petition she filed to move the money from Britney's trust into Lou Taylor's connected investment firm. It is very possible that Britney's fans actually saved her fortune by bringing attention to the possible attempted robbery that was underway. This was probably the moment when it became the most evident that Britney's sister and the rest of her family were knowingly complicit in her trafficking for their own personal gain. Lou Taylor has proudly displayed Prince as one of the many celebrities she represents, specifically dealing with the postmortem rights of his estate. And court documents show she was paid over $200,000 for services rendered. Then on January 2, 2021, a dispute was filed by the IRS who claimed his estate had been undervalued by 50%. Speaker 2: The IRS saying it's worth a $163,200,000 and accuses administrators of undervaluing his assets by 80,000,000. America Bank and Trust overseeing the late music icon. The state claims it's worth just 82,300,000. Harris wants the bank to pay up over 32,000,000 in back taxes. Speaker 10: Little is known as to the extent of TriStar's role in the massive discrepancy, but it represents yet another instance of significant misappropriation of funds suffered by one of Lou Taylor's famous clients. As far back as 2015, Lou Taylor showed up in public records as a registered agent for Kylie Jenner's cosmetics company, King Kylie Holdings, and also Kim Kardashian's company, KKW Fragrance LLC. Kylie's company was then subsequently valued at 1,200,000,000, and it was announced by Forbes that she had become the youngest ever self made billionaire. Speaker 20: Kylie Jenner just cut a major deal. The 22 year old of Keeping Up With the Kardashians fame, of course, has agreed to sell a majority stake in her cosmetics line to industry giant Coty for $600,000,000, and the deal valued her brand in total, 1,200,000,000. Speaker 10: Her legions of loyal fans praised her for her entrepreneurial prowess and business acumen, not realizing they were watching another one of Lou Taylor's possible scams playing out. Cody bought the massive stake while seemingly doing very little of the due diligence needed to determine whether the valuation was accurate. They invested over $600,000,000 of their shareholders' value to buy the stake. And according to the SEC, they completed the transaction in cash, an unusual event for acquisitions of that size. Lou Taylor was a registered agent for Kylie Cosmetics at the time, so it was likely she played a key role in brokering the sale. Cody's shareholders then called the deal into question after they realized Kylie's company had been grossly overvalued. Forbes even retracted their story, citing that she most likely showed them fake tax returns. Since then, lawsuits against both companies were brought against CODI by disgruntled shareholders who realized their investments were squandered on these toxic and suspicious deals. Now this is where it gets really weird. Around the time of the 51% cash sale of King Kiley LLC by CODI, a huge and unusual payment hit the account of Stonebridge Investment Council in the amount of, you guessed it, approximately $600,000,000. After exposing the mysterious $600,000,000 payment in Stonebridge, BJ was confronted by the chief counsel at her law firm saying that they had been contacted by Lou Taylor requesting that all BJ's videos be removed from the Internet. Speaker 18: And I said, no. Speaker 10: BJ was told that Lou Taylor had become a client of the firm, so she was no longer allowed to make disparaging comments on social media. She refused and resigned from the firm. Speaker 18: It started to become very clear that I was about to have to start abiding by a totally different, unfair set of rules. I really just had to make the decision to walk away from the job. Looking back, like, that was just a huge scare tactic. And I was scared, and I am still a little scared. I just refused to allow them to ever be able to say that they fired me from that job Speaker 10: ever. While Lou Taylor may be the head of the conservatorship snake, the rest of the team calm parasites, like Sam Ingham, Vivian Thoreen, Judge Rebaguetz, Judge Brenda Penny, Brian Spears, Larry Rudolph, Andrew Wallet, and Jamie Lynn have stood by and watched, each playing their part to convince the world that Britney is Speaker 9: safe. Speaker 10: Perhaps saddest of all is that her own parents allowed themselves to be used as puppets to falsely portray a wholesome public image of a devoted family whose only interest is their daughter's well-being. The reality is they all conspire herself so they could continue to leech her hard earned wealth in perpetuity. And they would continue to get away with it until a formal criminal investigation is done into Lou Taylor and her spider web of suspicious business dealings that citizen journalists in the Free Britney movement have been exposing for years. Speaker 7: You wanna be some me? Speaker 10: Official documents show that Jamie Spears' law firm, Holland and Knight, billed the conservatorship for roughly $1,500,000 over just an 8 month period, all paid for with Britney's money. Listed among the expenses was a hefty price tag of $500,000 designated for media matters, a fund many believe was set aside to confront the rising tide of public anger directed against Jamie Spears and Britney's management the to steer a public narrative that would ensure they could keep getting paid indefinitely. News agencies were guided along 3 core narratives favorable to the conservatorship. In order for the corrupt and unjustified conservatorship to remain in place, Britney needed to be deemed mentally incapacitated. This is why the primary public relations strategy for the conservatorship has always been to keep pushing the lie that Britney is unable to care for herself. Even though her flawless nightly performances and other lucrative public appearances show a high level of competency and professionalism. Awareness of Britney's plight is quickly approaching critical mass, but compromised news agencies are still working tirelessly to push the same old script. Speaker 21: As you probably heard, there are some stories last week that she was being held against her will. Obviously, here she is out and about. Clearly, she's not a prisoner at this facility. Speaker 22: She's not. Speaker 6: Making anyone work against their will, taking all their possessions away, credit card, cash, phone, passport card, and placing them in the home. I work 7 days a week, no days off, which in California, the only similar thing to this is called sex trafficking. Speaker 22: I mean, she checked herself in with some pretty deep seated trouble. Speaker 6: I'm sorry, Britney. You have to listen to your doctors. They are planning to send you to a small home in Beverly Hills to do a small rehab program that we're gonna make up for you. You're gonna pay $60,000 a month for this. Speaker 22: He runs her conservatorship and has for more than 10 years, and she is very close to Speaker 9: him. Speaker 6: I cried on the phone for an hour, and he loved every minute of it. The control he had over someone as powerful as he needed to hurt his own daughter 100,000 percent, he loved it. Speaker 21: Part of the tailspin was, getting off a regular schedule with her medication. Speaker 6: He immediately, the next day, put me on lithium out of nowhere. And lithium is a very, very strong and completely different medication compared to what I was used to. You can go mentally impaired if you take too much. Speaker 22: She has never been formally diagnosed with being bipolar, but there are signs that it mimics that at the very least. Right. Speaker 6: I've been so angry and I cry every day. It concerns me. I'm told I'm not allowed to expose the people who did this to me. For my sanity, I need the judge to prove me to do an interview where I can be heard on what they did to me. Speaker 22: This conservatorship will go on indefinitely probably for the rest of her life. Speaker 4: This is CNN, the most trusted name in news. Speaker 10: News agencies likely benefiting from her millions want you to believe that Britney has had full autonomy over her own life and can do as she pleases. In an interview with CNN's Chloe Millaz conducted with Britney advocates in May that never aired, Khloe insisted that Britney is not a prisoner. Speaker 3: What I have been told repeatedly from people that, you know, work on Britney's side is that she is not a prisoner in her home. Speaker 10: Mentioned also was a report in 2019 that Britney told judge Brenda Penny that she feared her own father, which Chloe denied ever seeing. Speaker 3: Why do you think she went she went down there if she hates her dad so much and hates the conservatorship and is scared of him? Like, what do you guys think about that? Speaker 10: CNN did not air the moment BJ set the record straight, pointing out that this report had in fact come from Khloe herself. Speaker 18: That was not public. And in fact, one of the sources that reported that was you. So I read it in a CNN report. Speaker 3: Because I don't know what you're talking about right now, so I would love to see that with my Speaker 10: name. This leaked tape clearly reveals Khloe's journalistic indifference when Britney herself claimed she was at risk and exposes CNN's clear bias in pushing a narrative favorable to the fraudulent conservatorship. As reckless as CNN's coverage has been, most Britney advocates would agree that TMZ is by far the worst offender. For years, TMZ has acted more as a publicist for Jamie Spears than an independent news outlet. Speaker 21: Free Britney as in remove the conservatorship, I think it's pretty obvious that the conservatorship is still necessary. So it's vital. Speaker 10: TMZ founder Harvey Levin has even credited Jamie for saving Britney's life. Speaker 22: Britney was circling the drain. Oh, absolutely. It was desperate where Jamie thought he was gonna get a call from the coroner. If Britney didn't have this conservatorship, Britney might not be alive today. Speaker 10: In stark contrast to what CNN and TMZ have rigorously maintained, Britney has testified that her father ruined her life, and most shocking of all, that she believes that he and the management team were trying to kill her. Control of Britney's social media accounts are also essential to protect the racket and to prevent her from accidentally saying too much. A company called CrowdServ has managed Britney's social media accounts for almost the entire conservatorship. And Cassie Petrie has uploaded post to Britney's pages. We now know that her team has routinely used her social media to lie to her fans and drive a narrative that protects the conservatorship at Britney's expense. It appears Cassie may have even used Britney's Twitter page to wish herself a happy birthday in 2,011. It also should be noted that many Britney advocates critical the conservatorship have had their social media posts censored, removed, or in some cases, their entire accounts taken down. This shows there was not only coordination with Britney's team and the mainstream media, but also with big tech to silence her supporters. If not for Britney's most loyal fans, the story of her forced conservatorship may have never seen the light of day. It was they who went searching for court filings and followed the money. It was they who discovered the names and faces of the traffickers who locked Britney up and threw away the key. It is no wonder that her most outspoken fans would become public enemy number 1 and face intense scorn from bad actors who stood to lose the most. There's nothing I love more than our pop princess Britney Spears and a good old conspiracy theory. Now her father Jamie is sounding off about that hashtag free Britney telling critics they don't know what they're talking about. All these conspiracy theorists don't know anything. Since the very first Britney Phan took to the street in protest against the injustice they had discovered, Compromised news outlets portrayed them as crazy, deranged conspiracy theorists with no friends and too much time on their hands. A classic humiliation for anyone in history brave enough to speak truth to power. If they can knowingly hide the truth about Britney's tragic situation and allow her to remain a victim of grave injustice at the hands of corrupt business entities, then as a discerning public, we must ask the question. What else have they been lying about? If there was one good thing to come out of Britney's tragic story, it's that national attention is now focused on the hideous underbelly of Hollywood and the systemic corruption and abuse of the entertainment industry as a whole. Young stars who came up with Britney have spoken out about the abuse they suffered at the hands of powerful industry executives. Disney should have been the safest place for aspiring child entertainers looking for a dream, but it became one of the worst offenders instead. The media giant's disturbing track record of employing and giving free passes to child molesters or people with a history of dangerous behavior towards children is well documented. Disney hired convicted child rapist Victor Salba to direct the film Powder. Speaker 16: In a city where dreams are made, fame can come at a price. Speaker 1: My first memory of when the abuse started and, you know, eventually progressed over the next 5 years. Videotape all of it. I mean, it was it was full blown. Speaker 16: When they found out, Nathan's family went to the police and Salva was convicted and jailed, but that hasn't affected his Hollywood career. Powder, one of the scripts he wrote in prison, was distributed by Disney's Buena Vista Pictures. Speaker 10: The company claims they did not know Salvo was a convicted pedophile until after the production started, but then refused to fire him even after they learned of the crime. Speaker 1: And big names in Hollywood have been backing him throughout the entire process. It just seems like there's, like, an exclusive club, and victors are part of that club. Speaker 10: In 2018, Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn received nationwide condemnation for shocking comments he posted on social media, in which he made light of child sexual abuse. He was fired after intense public pressure. Speaker 2: The offensive attitudes and statements discovered on James's Twitter feed are indefensible and inconsistent with our studio's values, and we have severed our business relationship with him. Speaker 10: But then Disney once again demonstrate their indifference by hiring him back as soon as the issue had faded from the news. Speaker 16: Hollywood might not like talking about it, but it doesn't take a lot of digging to find even more examples of how it often has selective amnesia when it comes to some of the past behavior of those it chooses to welcome into the fold. Speaker 10: One of the more shocking revelations was a 2017 report revealing 35 Disney employees had been arrested for child sex crimes since 2006. In 2004, The New York Times revealed a highly coordinated child trafficking syndicate at Disneyland, where victims would be identified with yellow dresses before being picked up and sold to organized criminals. Speaker 7: I'm Belle Thorpe from, shake it up, and you're watching Disney channel. Speaker 10: Bella Thorne, another Disney star just like Britney, has openly discussed the abuse she endured as a child performer in the Hollywood system and explained how everyone saw but said nothing. Speaker 12: Getting molested for from your 6 to your 14 seems like way harder circumstances or being physically abused all the time seems like a much more difficult situation than you have paparazzi following you since you were 12. I was still being molested when paparazzi were still following me, but having no idea the type of mistreatment that I was still dealing with at that time that everyone around me saw and did nothing. Speaker 10: The pattern of entertainment companies targeting talented children of vulnerable parents can be seen in the case of another former Mickey Mouse club star, Christina Aguilera. She was abused by her father. Her mother, Shelley Kearns, counts finding Christina as a child with blood on her face after her dad punished her. And I go upstairs. Speaker 7: I didn't miss my 4 year old girl. She has blood going down her chin. Speaker 10: Former child movie star, Mina Savary, recently opened up about the abuse she sustained in the industry. Speaker 23: Laced throughout her stories of sexual abuse through a series of bad relationships. You described, at 12, losing your virginity against your will, essentially. Speaker 7: Mhmm. Speaker 10: A part of me died that day for sure. Sure. As well as an inappropriate encounter with alleged pedophile Kevin Spacey on the set of American Beauty. Long time Britney Powell, Paris Hilton, detailed abuse she suffered at the Provo Canyon School in her documentary, This is Paris. And during a deposition hearing Children were restrained, hit, thrown into walls, strangled, and sexually abused regularly at Provo. Speaker 24: I was verbally, mentally, and physically abused on a daily basis. I was cut off from the outside world and stripped of all of my human rights. I could not report this because all communication with my family was monitored and censored. This is unconstitutional, degrading, and terrifying. Speaker 10: Singer Kaia Jones said the Pussycat Dolls was a prostitution ring, and the group's founder, Robin Anton, who launched another girl group called GRL with Britney's former manager, Larry Rudolph, was the, quote, den mother from hell. Speaker 24: Today, I wanna talk about a controversial topic, my conservatorship case. Speaker 10: Amanda Bynes, who is also in a controversial conservatorship, tweeted she was sexually abused by her father, but then took the comment back. She worked alongside Dan Schneider at Nickelodeon who resigned after several allegations of abuse and very inappropriate behavior surfaced. Underpinning every one of these reported instances of abuse is the code of silence that governs the industry. These rules of secrecy are so strictly upheld that powerful Cindy McCain, wife of the late Republican senator, admitted they all knew of Jeffrey Epstein's child sex trafficking through the years. Speaker 3: Epstein was hiding the Klan's side. We all knew about him. We all knew what he was doing, but we had no one that was no, Speaker 10: And acknowledge that people remain silent even after Epstein's first conviction, allowing the pedophile to continue his reign of terror against young victims for several years without This is exceptionally alarming since Cindy McCain sits as the head of the McCain Institute, an organization that claims to combat trafficking. Not only would a list stars turn a blind eye to Hollywood's most vicious abusers, they would openly praise and elevate them to untouchable status. Speaker 4: May I ask her? Goes for Roman Polanski. Speaker 2: Harvey Weinstein. Bob Weinstein. God bless him. Speaker 22: Harvey Weinstein who believed in us Speaker 21: and made this movie. Harvey and Bob Weinstein. Speaker 7: Harvey Weinstein. Thank you, Harvey Weinstein. Especially Harvey. Speaker 2: I wanna thank Harvey and Bob Weinstein. Speaker 19: Thank Harvey Weinstein. Speaker 4: Harvey Weinstein. Harvey. Speaker 18: I would like to thank Harvey Weinstein. Harvey Weinstein who had the guts, the courage, the commitment. Speaker 2: Especially Harvey Weinstein, a man of dedication and vision. Speaker 5: Harvey Weinstein. Well, listen Speaker 10: Researchers and free Britney advocates went on a quest to find justice for just one person. And in so doing, uncovered the evil tricks and methods used to force young entertainers into a life of abuse and involuntary servitude even as millions of unaware fans buy their records and unwittingly participate in the crime. Could Kanye be next? The hip hop star's public outbursts were well documented, But the parallels between his situation and that of Britney and Lindsay Lohan are striking. Lou Taylor began business ties with his mother-in-law Speaker 3: Kris Jenner. Come on in. Speaker 10: Do you have any further comments about Caitlyn Jenner? Speaker 25: We start this half hour with word that Kanye West is waking up in a Los Angeles hospital where he's now under observation reportedly for exhaustion and stress. Speaker 10: After what the media reported was a, quote, public meltdown in 2016, he was forced into a 51.50 hold, a legal framework that allows others to step in and make decisions on their behalf. Sources close to Kanye have told this documentary they believed he had been drugged and set up, and that this 5150 hold was an attempt to get control of his kids and money. Later in 2020, Kanye tweeted that, quote, Kim was sending doctors to 5150 him and lock him up. A frightening accusation, especially after we already learned that Kim Kardashian and Kylie Jenner both had businesses managed by none other than Lou Taylor. It's also worth noting that Kris and Kim are currently working with Eden Yemeni and his Israeli security company, Black Box, that allegedly facilitated the secret surveillance that took place in Britney's home. Britney's story has created enough public awareness to protect other stars from this corrupt strategy of hijacking famous estates. Anyone who believes in equal justice, Britney fans or not, should now demand full and expansive criminal investigations into all who architected, architected, perpetrated, and knowingly benefited from these hideous acts of fraud and abuse. Otherwise, everything the Free Britney movement fought for will have been in vain. The web of Britney's conservatorship corruption is tied to many powerful members of the political establishment, from low level players all the way to the White House. On February 8, 2016, Lou Taylor donated $25100 to the Democratic National Committee. Only 10 days later, Britney was paraded in front of cameras for a photo op with then presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, to give her political campaign a boost, a moment where Britney's discomfort could hardly be mistaken. In a leaked email released by WikiLeaks, we learned that heads of the Democratic National Committee were aware that Britney was being forced to work against her will, and that her team wouldn't allow her to quit because she was making too much money. Lauren Durham wrote this about Britney to the DNC finance chairman, Jordan Kaplan. She's a poor soccer kid who wanted to quit the game and be normal a long time ago, but her parents, manager, lawyers won't let because she's too much of a cash cow. So even though powerful players were aware of Britney's enslavement, they not only remain silent, but had no problem using her as a political tool to endorse a presidential candidate during an election year. Speaker 7: Election year. Speaker 10: Vice president Kamala Harris served as California's ignored requests from Britney advocates to take action. Ignored requests from Britney advocates to take action. Nina Simone's granddaughter claimed that Harris was involved in the stealing of the late blues singer's estate. Speaker 26: The granddaughter of legendary singer Nina Simone blames Kamala Harris for taking away the estate from her family while she served as California's attorney general. In one tweet she wrote, Nina's granddaughter here. My family doesn't run her estate anymore. It was taken away from us and given to white people. Our family name was dragged in the media. We get no royalties. Nothing. Wanna hold someone accountable? Ask Kamala Harris why she came for my family. Speaker 10: And to this day, the vice president has remained silent I'm free Britney. Multiple law firms working for Jamie, such as Sidley Austin and Holland and Knight, which are hugely benefiting from the conservatorship, are also donors to the DNC. Holland and Knight hired former US congressman Ron Klein, who is earning $1,285 per hour charged directly to Britney's conservatorship. Some politicians have raised their voices in support of Britney. Senator Elizabeth Warren recently called for the department of housing and homeland security secretary, Xavier Becerra, to review Britney's conservatorship data, initially viewed as encouraging development in the fight to free Britney. However, this hope was short lived when free Britney advocates noted that Becerra had consistently ignored calls to help Britney when he took over as California's attorney general and the seat left by Kamala Harris. Representative Matt Gaetz was the first member of congress to speak out in support of Britney. Speaker 4: I do believe the nation was quite taken with the control that the guardianship and conservatorship process has on far too many Americans. I am glad Britney Spears got to speak out on this issue finally yesterday. Speaker 10: He accused his congressional colleagues of indifference to the issue of abusive conservatorships and claimed they were actually blocking an investigation into Britney's situation. Speaker 4: And I would reiterate the call to chairman Nadler to allow us to hold hearings on conservatorship and abuse, and I think the very first witness before the judiciary committee should be Britney Spears. 3 Britney, I yield back. Speaker 2: Now we're gonna have the latest on Florida congressman Matt Gaetz. He's facing an FBI investigation over allegations of a relationship with an underage girl. Speaker 10: Soon after his statements, Gates was accused of using a site called Seeking Arrangements to traffic a 17 year old girl. Though no victims ever came forward to corroborate claims and seeking arrangements have since made a public statement saying he never had an account. Speaker 2: And I won't be extorted by a former DOJ official and the crooks he is working with. Speaker 10: The case also resulted in indictment of Stephen Alford, who attempted to extort Gates over the matter. Some Free Britney fans have suggested this could have been an attempt to silence him from future advocacy in support of Britney's freedom. A clear demonstration of the conspiracy to silence Britney's supporters can be found in the case of John Erdley, the only honest lawyer who worked aggressively to stand up for Britney's constitutional rights. In February of 2008, after he was hired by Britney, Erdley claimed that someone wrestled the phone away from her during a phone conversation. Then on February 12th, Erdley filed a petition to refer Britney's case to the US District Court saying he was concerned for her emotional and physical safety and that she was being deprived of her constitutional rights. Sadly, this petition was mysteriously denied by US district judge Philip Gutierrez who stated, without any formal examination or proof, that Britney was not mentally fit to retain her own counsel. Early spokesman Michael Sands stated that the theft was on a grand scale involving racketeering, wire fraud, and money laundering. Sands later said that as a result of Girdley's advocacy for Britney's freedom, his office was broken into and files were deleted from his computer. A clear sign of organized criminal elements working to protect the perpetrators of the massive fraud taking place in Britney's estate. Burdley was eventually sanctioned for persistently challenging Jamie Spears' control over Britney's affairs, resulting in him losing his law license. And in one final crushing blow to prevent John Early from ever winning justice for Britney, judge Aviva k Bob approved a restraining order preventing him from having any contact with Britney. In true organized crime fashion, compromised and unscrupulous lawyers are needed to protect the guilty while silencing victims at every turn. Few are worse than Blair Burke. She represented Britney in 2,000 7, and then her father in 2009, violating state bar ethics codes. In that same year, Burke gave testimony that helped cement the conservatorship and also assisted in securing the restraining order against John Erdly. She falsely claimed that Britney did not know Earnley or want him as her attorney, even though a voice mail recording from Britney herself reveals the opposite. Burke has a long history of helping pedophiles and rapists. She represented Harvey Weinstein and reportedly helped him frame his victims and is reportedly spearheading Prince Andrew's US legal team. Bipartisan representatives, Charlie Crist and Nancy Mace, have proposed a piece of legislation questionably named the Free Britney Act to reform conservatorship abuse. Advocates in the Free Britney movement were quick to speak out against the bill, recognizing it for what it was, a transparent attempt to obtain limitless funding while simply placing victims of abusive conservatorships under full government control. Lawmakers have admitted that the act would lead to no criminal investigations or have any power to bring Britney's conservator parasites to justice. Speaker 3: Will the victims of guardianship abuse be able to see any sort of criminal charges? Speaker 18: Not a part of this legislation. Correct, Charlie? Speaker 19: Yeah. Right. Uh-huh. Right. Speaker 10: Charlie Crist and his many conflicts of interest have become the focus of heavy scrutiny by advocates in the Free Britney movement. He served as a district attorney when the negotiations started for Jeffrey Epstein's infamous sweetheart deal and was accused of taking bribes from Scott Rothstein, who is currently incarcerated for running one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history. Chris was so close to roasting that he often frequented his home and attended his 2008 wedding at the Versace mansion. Lou Pearlman was the manager for boy bands, NSYNC, and Backstreet Boys, notorious for accusations from young men who claim he molested them or sought to exchange sex to help with their careers. He was accused of forcing the young performers to work long hours with rehearsals up to 8 hours straight in poor conditions, paying each member of men's sync only $10,000 after 2 years of grueling work and 10,000,000 records sold, far below minimum wage. Some light at the end of a long, dark tunnel for investors who were scammed by boy band legend and Ponzi schemer, Lou Pearlman. In 2006, investigators discovered Pearlman had defrauded investors out of more than $1,000,000,000. Charlie Crist was accused of delaying and interfering with investigations into Perelman when he was Florida attorney general. Why is this guy, who's the attorney general, not interested in this huge scam with thousands of victims? For years, Charlie Crist had all the power needed to stop the horrific exploitation and abuse of countless victims, but he did nothing. It is no wonder that the free Britney bill is a complete and utter sham, designed only to deflect from the powerful criminals who trafficked Britney Spears into a life of forced servitude for nearly 2 decades. For her whole life, Britney was set up by evil vipers in every direction. It is disturbing beyond words that anyone, especially her own family, could be so motivated by pure greed that they would willingly dehumanize her to the extent that they did, treating her as nothing more than an unlimited ATM for their luxurious lifestyle. Thanks to the passionate devotion of her fans, it appears a long awaited resolution to Britney's involuntary conservatorship is near. What Britney's horrific story has taught us, however, is that our fight against the injustice of human trafficking can never end. We were shown through Britney's ordeal that institutional corruption extends into every level of power, even to the highest office in the land. We learned that organized criminals can be rich, famous, and powerful, and protected at the highest levels by people who eloquently preach morality on TV while practicing the opposite in private. Britney's fans are American heroes. They stood up not just for a beloved pop princess and a national treasure who defined a generation, before the constitutionally guaranteed rights of every citizen no matter who they are or how they voted. Free Britney will forever be a defining moment in our culture when we came together as a nation, set aside our differences, and remember what truly unites us all. Early morning.
hodgetwins
Posted - March 22, 2024 at 7:10 PM
Saved - March 23, 2024 at 7:26 PM

@hodgetwins - Hodgetwins

.@jakeshieldsajj on .@TheTwinsPod Episode 5! Yeahhhh

@TheTwinsPod - Twins Pod

Twins Pod Episode 5: Jake Shields .@jakeshieldsajj is a UFC icon and American patriot. He joins The .@Hodgetwins to talk about his career and his views on the current state of the world. It's a DAMN good conversation! https://t.co/IXM6V4lnf7

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, UFC legend Jake Shields engages in a conversation that covers a wide range of topics. He discusses his experiences in the sport and addresses the issue of freedom of speech in the UFC. Shields shares his views on Twitter, anti-Semitism, and transgender fighters. The discussion then shifts to the controversy surrounding Jake Paul's boxing career and the money in MMA. The conversation takes a deep dive into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, exploring its history, complexities, and the mistreatment of Palestinians. The speakers also touch on issues of racism, ethnic cleansing, and the power dynamics involved. They express frustration with the lack of awareness and understanding among the general public. The conversation further delves into topics such as the Epstein case, the Jewish mafia, and the role of money in politics. The speakers criticize the government's handling of issues like the border and foreign aid, expressing their dissatisfaction with the current political climate. They discuss the complexity of Jewish identity, potential hyperinflation in the future, and their preference for America-first policies. The video concludes with discussions about tax laws, defamation lawsuits, and politics. The speakers express frustration with the current tax system, government spending, and mention plans for future political engagement and potential YouTube ventures.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We got a UFC legend. Jake Shields. He's a man's man. Speaker 1: Great to meet you guys. I've been watching you guys since 5, 6 years ago. Speaker 0: You actually enjoy hurting people. Right? You know, Speaker 1: you don't want to, but when you're out there, it feels kinda good. Speaker 0: Why do you think USC is such a freedom of speech, pro freedom, conservative leaning? Speaker 1: It's a great question. I never really noticed that until COVID and BLM hit. Speaker 0: Yeah. You got in fight at a BLM rally? Speaker 1: People are getting beat up on the streets. So I go running out there. Some guys is all bloody on the ground getting beat. So I run over, start throwing people off. Like, 20 of them are gonna take me with, like, bats and shit. These are pathetic. Speaker 0: Yeah. Twitter feed is crazy. I love it. Speaker 1: Anti Semitic, Nazi, blah blah. Epstein just didn't kill himself. Biden's not running the country. We do that. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Everybody knows that. He's not tweeting me. Speaker 1: The new p d d stuff coming out. Speaker 0: It's like R Kelly 2 point o. Right? You challenge some transgender men in a fight. I've challenged the Speaker 1: the 10 toughest trans men. I'll fight them all. Speaker 0: What do you think about the ball? Speaker 1: It's insane. That's what I was gonna say. Can't comprehend. Speaker 0: Can I become Jewish? Speaker 1: I tried. They said, hell no. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Welcome to episode 5. We got a UFC legend, Jake Shields. He's a man's man. Yeah. But before we get to Jake, gotta pay the bills. Yeah. This video is brought to you by Optimal Human. Yeah. It's a great drink. It's a all in one nutritional supplement. Yeah. It's got 90 plus ingredients. It's for your brain. Gut. It's for your gut. Yeah. It's for your, hell, skin. It's for your whole body. Yeah. Makes your body great again. Yeah. This is it's better than these all these other green drinks. Tastes like you're licking up on a lawnmower, like you blend up a damn tree and you're drinking the bitch. Yeah. This actually tastes good. Yeah. It's a great drink. Go to optimal human.com to get your American made all in one nutritional drink with all your fruits and veggies. Yeah. Yeah. Episode 5. We got Jake Hils in the house. Yeah. How you doing, brother? Speaker 1: Hey. Doing pretty good. Great to meet you guys. I've been watching you guys for since I first started Volleyball politics maybe 5, 6 years ago. Some of the favorite guys to watch. I think you're, being an athlete, you're more relatable to me than guys like Ben Shapiro. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I heard you, a San Francisco native, Yeah. Speaker 1: From there. So most of my friends were all liberal. I think I was I was telling you too when I first started, a lot of my friends, like black and Mexican and stuff, they were all liberal, but but you guys they could relate to. They started watching your videos, like, oh, these guys are funny. Maybe it should look like you. I don't know. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Like that. It was like so you're great for bringing in different audiences too. Speaker 0: So it Speaker 1: was great to finally meet you guys and sit down, have a chat. Speaker 0: Yeah. I came across some I I wasn't really into, MMA, and I started following, about, say, 2 weeks ago. I was your US Wonder 1st people I came across. Speaker 1: Oh, nice. Yeah. That me Speaker 0: and my brother are pussy. Yeah. That court is brutal. Speaker 1: You people Speaker 0: Diaz actually gotta have you actually Speaker 1: I mean, you know, you don't want to, but when you're out there, it feels kinda good. Speaker 0: But you don't feel good about it afterwards. But when Speaker 1: you're out there, you're not gonna break this guy's arm, split his face up, but your adrenaline gets going, and you turn into a freaking savage. It's kind Speaker 0: of a I came up with you and, Sean Strickland. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. Sean's friend of mine. Tenacity where y'all, like, charging people the whole fight. Speaker 1: Mhmm. It's coming at him. Speaker 0: I'm, like, looking at him. I was like, man, give that dude. Let him breathe for fun. Speaker 1: But, yeah, so I tried to just break people. I actually just saw Sean, like, 10 minutes ago. I was scared from Speaker 0: the gym. It's like, y'all constantly just just going after this. None of this. Speaker 1: No. Just attack attack. You gotta wear people up. Gotta be in good shape for that though. Just keep coming. Speaker 0: Dude, the boss fight you or or sorry. Like, fuck. Speaker 1: I quit. Speaker 0: I'm nicer than Sean. Speaker 1: Right. Well, not what I'm fighting, but Sean Sean, even in the training, you know, Sean beat up Nikko. Speaker 0: Right? Right. Yeah. I saw that. That's like well, I saw the whole video. 1st, I just saw the clip of him, like, beating the hell out of him. Mhmm. But he actually let him hit him for, like Speaker 1: The first part everyone should watch. A lot of people only watch a beat him up. That part's pretty funny. Speaker 0: It's kinda fucked up. Speaker 1: He's talking shit, moving around, being like, oh, this is how you thought it was gonna go, is it? Yeah. I'm a bet your but things are about to get tough. Speaker 0: He's just going on and on. But then he starts welling on Sneko, and you could actually see him, like, enjoying the shit out of it. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. He loved Speaker 0: it. Yeah. Speaker 1: Thing is I picked up Sneko that morning. He's supposed to work out a little light workout with me. He's like, oh, yeah. My manager has something to set up, sparring with Sean Strickland. I go, wait. What? No. No. You can't do this. Speaker 0: But then fuck with spar with him. Speaker 1: Yeah. I guess he already agreed to it. So he didn't wanna be a punk and pull out. But I'm like, bro, he's just so you know, he's gonna fuck you up. It's not like he's not gonna be playing around. Speaker 0: So Right. Speaker 1: You know, he's a man. He went there and did it, didn't complain, didn't didn't fall, never bitched about it. I told him, hey. If if you go in there, it's, you know, no you're you're agreeing to do this. So he took it like a man. You know? Speaker 0: Yeah. I was looking over your career. You you went, what, how many years without being undefeated? Speaker 1: I think went through, like, a 6 year streak or something without without losing. That time, I was just so laser and fighting, like, top talent at the time. You know, I think it'd be 3 or 4 UFC champs in that thing, won a few titles. Just laser laser focused. It's, you have to be because Speaker 0: That's the phase of something in, MMA because, you know, in boxing, you might see that you got in for what may work. But it's uncommon for an MMA fighter fight that long to be undefeated. Speaker 1: Yeah. Because MMA, in boxing, sometimes they'll do, they've had the records level in MMA. I think that's part of the reason why MMA is so popular. Guys just jump in and fight the best guys right away. No one dodges each other. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: But that's why the sport's so popular. All the best guys fight each in the prime. There's no problem there. Guys fight each other past their prime. Even Floyd Mayweather, he waited for, Pacquiao, like, past their prime. And it's like most top guys don't fight each other in their prime in boxing, which that's it may everyone in their prime is fighting against the top. And that's why you don't see very many guys going undefeated. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's almost like a, a Marcus man I I actually lost. You know? People I see MMFA, they eat it. They like that. It's I finally lost the fight. Like boxing, like you said, did that you alluded to, they avoid. They want to go in the field. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. No. Likes to likes to win a fight, but it's a lot more. You can come back a lot quicker from from MMA because everyone knows everyone's fighting the top fights. Plus, there's a there's a lot more factors. Boxing is just my 2 hands. Right? You have gloves, MMA, there's knees, chokes, takedowns. There's so many variables. You need someone you can match up bad with, or you can just those little small gloves more likely to get caught or a choke. There's just so many variables. So I think the the fans are a little more forgiving of a loss than in boxing. Speaker 0: Yeah. Like, when I'm watching boxing, when you go from boxing, watching boxing, being a fan of boxing and going to UFC, it's like, this is like the Roman Empire kind of shit. I can't why it was, like, brutal. Yeah. Like, this freaking all side deal? It's like It's brutal. Yeah. It's like medieval towns and shit. Yeah. Totally different. It is brutal. Speaker 1: I recommend you guys go, go look up, pride fighting if you haven't. It was all pride fights. They were awesome. It was, Yeah. Speaker 0: I remember pride. Yeah. Speaker 1: It was out in Japan. It was like, Yeah. Speaker 0: Pride made me quit watching this shit. Brutal. Speaker 1: You saw people's heads on the ground, and it's, it's it's worth one watching with all the fights. A lot of great fighters were there as well. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. A lot of, fighters from the U. S. Americas, they go with that and make more money. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. I used to fight in Japan when I was first, first coming up. That was, I never been on a plane and the next thing I know was flying to Japan with, like, I think it was, me and Nick Diaz. Yeah. Neither one of us have been on a plane, left the country. We're, like, young, all, like, fly out there. We get there. It's, it brings us to the middle of nowhere. No one speaks English. Literally, all Japanese people. We don't speak the language. I never ate Japanese food. Speaker 0: Hey, Jake. Did you get some long time action? Speaker 1: Maybe a little. They like the white boys at least. But, yeah, it was culture shock, man. I'm just like, Japan is still the craziest country I've been to. And it was, never mind my ass from the fucking from the Higner, but I'm playing it because I don't want Japan being like, what the fuck? Speaker 0: Yes. It's funny you should say that because I came across some TikTok videos the other day, and you see all these beautiful Asian one. Mhmm. Whether you're in Thailand, Japan, regardless of, you know, Asian descent, you noticed that they all were white American men. It's like it's like y'all a badge of honor. Speaker 1: I think so. I know it's popular out there. Right. You being a fighter and a good look white guy. I had girls waiting at the hotel for me, give me presents. I'm like, this this is fun. I can get used to this. Speaker 0: Oh, man. Well, that's white privilege right Right? Speaker 1: They're like brothers there too, Speaker 0: though. Yeah. Speaker 1: Some Asian countries, they don't. In Japan, they do. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: They would love you guys there. Yeah. Because my black friends loved it there too. Alright. Other countries, like, this sucks. Speaker 0: That's what I'm talking about. Hey. You bring up to be quality. Yeah. You bring up the money. How is the money? Because I hear, like, mixed people say they don't pay enough. He doesn't pay his fighters like he did. Speaker 1: It it's a very complicated question because overall, a lot of the mid level guys are not making that much money, but they're not unboxing either. So all the money is pushed towards the top. And it is, I would definitely agree it's underpaid, but there's also some really I really talk guys who get a lot of backdoor money that's not necessarily written in the contract, so it gets a little complicated. They don't want everyone knowing exactly what guys are making. So there is some I I do think they should get a higher percentage. I do think they're a little underpaid, but it's not quite as extreme as some people make it out to be. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Yeah. Because I'm when I look at, MMA Mhmm. I mean, their their seats are there's plenty of buttons in Speaker 1: the seats. Speaker 0: I'm like, why is this such a rumor that they're not getting? Speaker 1: No. They should be getting paid more, especially a lot Speaker 0: of a Speaker 1: lot of the bid level guys. You know, you got these guys making, you know, 50, $60 a fight, but but some of those guys get more. But but also some of the guys aren't that big a name. So it gets kinda kinda tricky. So it's like, okay. If you're not a big name, you're not bringing in the seats. Yeah. But the guys towards the top, you know, making a few millions. Some guys more, but there's only a few guys that are making the multimillions in in MMA versus, Speaker 0: I I had a friend when I was in Virginia. I'm not gonna give his name, but he was in MMA. He says, man, I'm I'm I'm doing these fights. These these men are trying to literally kill me. I'm making, like, 30, $40,000 a fight. Now he's doing movies. Speaker 1: No. It it's tough if you're at that, like, mid level fighter, you're not making much money. You're right. And let's say let's say you're making $50 a fight, and then you gotta pay your trainers, taxes. I forgot all that. It's like it's nothing. You know? But there there's money at the top. But like anything in life, again, that's how it goes. Yeah. So I think guys definitely should have a higher percentage than you'll see. They they definitely, cut it down more than they should, but it gets complicated. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Look at Logan Paul. This dude has made a career. Is it Logan or is it Jake? Speaker 1: Jake Paul is the one who's a little better, I think. Speaker 0: Okay. Jake. Speaker 1: Lo Logan's a good boxer too, but Jake's the Speaker 0: Yeah. Jake is the he's a professional boxer, but he's making a living fighting amateurs. Speaker 1: He's fought in some pretty good guys, but he's mostly gone for guys, smaller than him. Like, Nate Diaz is a good friend of mine, but Nate fought mostly at 1 Speaker 0: But how old is he? Speaker 1: 5. And he's, like, 40. And he fought yeah. Towards the end of his career, still great fighter, but Nate most of his career fighting 155, they fought at 190. So this is like what? Three weight classes up? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's still boxing, Nate's an MMA fighter. So he's picking guys that are, you know, guys that are a little bit older, smaller, and from a different sport. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: But still, Nate's a damn good boxer still regardless. So so Jake Paul is a good boxer to be someone in age level even though you can be always a little bit older now, MMA fighter. The guy still has hands. Speaker 0: Well, Jake is how tall is Jake and his weight? What's Speaker 1: his 66661 around there, I would guess. Speaker 0: Okay. About what? Is he Speaker 1: He fights about 190, 195. He probably weighs about 220 because he cut weight. Mhmm. They will cut a lot of weight. But Nate was fighting most of his career at 155. Mhmm. But he also beat, Speaker 0: Oh, shit. He had Speaker 1: to beat Tyrone Woodley too. Tyrone Woodley is a great fighter. He's a guy. I beat I beat him in his prime though. He waited till Tyrone looked like he'd slowed kinda way down towards the end for whatever reason. Speaker 0: Mhmm. He Speaker 1: wasn't super old, but he's hadn't looked, you know, near as good as he was. Yeah. Speaker 0: If the if the if the roles were reversed, let's say it was in an octagon, what do you think would happen? Speaker 1: Jake Paul is gonna lose. But Yeah. He has done some wrestling, so he's not gonna be most of these boxers that are saying they're switching them, but no wrestling, they're gonna get taken Speaker 0: down easy. Do you see him doing that in the future? Going MMA? Speaker 1: He might for the right opponent. You know? Yeah. He supposedly he's training a little bit. Speaker 0: He takes like a boxer. He picks up Speaker 1: the opponent. Speaker 0: Yeah. He wisely. Yeah. Speaker 1: No. I think I don't I'll go hate on Jake Paul, but I respect the guy. You know? He was already rich and famous, and he chose to do fighting. Speaker 0: I was looking at his net worth. He's worth, like, $80,000,000. And he's getting UFC guys paid. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: No. I know I know Nate got paid. He's a good friend of mine. Speaker 0: How much did Nate give? Speaker 1: I I'm not gonna say, but anytime. Speaker 0: It wasn't his biggest pick can you say that? Was it his biggest pick you Speaker 1: can cover? But he made some good money in the Conor McGregor fights too. So Right. Yeah. Because he had those he was one of the few guys in the UFC that was getting paid. Speaker 0: Yeah. That would be crazy if he made more money fighting 1 of the Paul brothers Speaker 1: and then Conor McGregor. Yeah. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's actually Speaker 1: a good question. I'm gonna I'm gonna ask him when I see him. I think I'm gonna see him Thursday. Speaker 0: Yeah. I Speaker 1: know I know about ballparking those, but I don't know exact numbers. Speaker 0: Oh, that's crazy. Yeah. Got a damn good episode going on. And before we get to that, 8, over 94% of y'all are watching, but you ain't subscribed. What kind of bullshit is that? Did you forget? We got a lot of damn good shows coming. Yeah. I mean, famous people. Yeah. I'm not having a bunch of plumbers and got some real people coming. Well, they real too, but Not ain't. They ain't famous. I got famous people coming on. Make sure you subscribe. Hit the bell for notifications so y'all get notified whenever we got a damn new show coming. These people, they got brains. They know how to subscribe and well, the white producers is telling us to say that shit. Hey, I wanna, I'll be checking out your Twitter. Yeah. Your feed is a lot of shit. Yeah. I think it's fair to say you're not a fan of the G. Speaker 1: Ouch. No. That's, everyone says that. But, no, it's, it's a complicated issue. So first off Speaker 0: It is. It is. Definitely is. Speaker 1: I shouldn't have say this, but I'll say I'm not anti Semitic. You know, I my best friends are Jewish. It's ridiculous I even have to say this. Right. But I've been very, very critical of Israel Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And in particular, the control they have over American politics. It's absolutely insane. And this is it's such a complex issue that you have to dig deep. You know? So I'll throw a few of the things out there. I I could spend, like, probably 5 hours. Right. Yeah. So I'll just throw a few little things. First, one of the biggest ways they control America is through APAC, which is the it's the Israeli Jewish lobby. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Technically, foreign lobbies have to register under FARA, foreign agent. This is the law of land. Mhmm. Israel is the only lobby that doesn't register that way. That means we don't know where the money comes from. So our tax dollars, for example, could go to Israel. They could take some of the tax dollars, funnel it back to APAC. APAC could take that money and pay off our politicians to then give them more money. Yeah. So they have, like, 100 of $1,000,000 to raise people that we can't track the money. Speaker 0: It's no transparent. Speaker 1: It's against the law, but they don't enforce it. JFK was trying to shut down, it wasn't APAC then. It was what turned into APAC. That was the same month he got shot. Speaker 0: Oh, man. That was just a Speaker 1: coincidence. Yeah. Just coincidence. Same thing with the nuclear program. He was trying to shut down and and Jack and Jack Rubinstein. They call Rak him being Jewish was coincidence. His ties with Meyer Lansky, head of the Jewish mafia. Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Speaker 1: Another coincidence. Right. Meyer Lansky helping, establish Israel. Just all coincidences. Speaker 0: Yeah. Is it safe to say that Democrats and Republicans equally are not standing up and pointing that out? Speaker 1: Yeah. Both sides are bought. I think, actually, even though I don't like Democrats, they've actually been a little better on the Israel issue. I think because Yeah. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: think it's just because a lot of Democratic base are more of the, which I hate siding with these free Palestine people. I think that's why some people actually support Israel because they see these guys, and they're like, oh, they're wrong about everything. Right. They actually are right about the Palestinians being screwed over. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: I was actually, few years ago, I was a hardcore pro Israel guy. Speaker 0: So I Dude, Speaker 1: I was stupid. Yeah. So I fell for the lies. They do a great job of spinning a narrative, you know. It's when I, visited Israel and I kinda started to see it. At first, I was believing it. They're like, oh, it was always our land, this and that. But it's like I mean, most of you guys are European, obviously. So it's Speaker 0: most of you are European. Yeah. And they're like and Speaker 1: I looked at Middle Eastern, and it's like, this is, this is their land. Speaker 0: You know what got me interested? Like, before I get in that, remember Kanye West was on the Alex Jones Show? Yeah. And I totally ragged Kanye. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, we kinda went in on him. Speaker 1: Yeah. I was like Kanye, but I thought he was crazy at the time. Speaker 0: I thought he was crazy and looking back on it, I was the stupid one. I actually think I owe him apology for Yeah. What I said because I didn't do my research. I never understood, the history of Israel. Well, his message Kanye's message is totally wrong. The whole lifeguard terrible. Speaker 1: That was actually brilliant. Yeah. I'm like, why does he have a Net in Yahoo? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: And then I go, oh, Benjamin Net in Yahoo. That's brilliant. Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm like, Speaker 1: this motherfucker is. Speaker 0: It isn't new. Crazy. He's got his mask on. Right. And he's just sitting there like a gimp. Yeah. It's like hey. Speaker 1: This motherfucker. Speaker 0: His delivery is Yeah. His delivery is wrong. Yeah. But Speaker 1: Yeah. His delivery is terrible rewatch that interview now, though. Speaker 0: Right. Right. Right. But I think I owe him apology. A lot of the things he said went right over my head now. And at the time, I automatically assumed that Israel was Because you're conservative. Because I'm a conservative. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, I have a well, look who runs the conservative media. PragerU is ran by a literal Israeli intelligence person who runs it. Breitbart, ran by Jews. Not saying all Jews are in a side way, but they're gonna tend to. Daily Wire, ran by Jews. Speaker 0: Did you see the shit between, Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens? Speaker 1: Just recently or what? It was just recently. Candace Owens been criticized, Speaker 0: you know, made some criticism of what Israel's doing and Mhmm. They went after each other a little bit. Well, actually, Ben went after her. She didn't go after him. Right. What do Speaker 1: you call her, like, an anti Semitic, Nazi, blah blah. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's what they're calling her. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a way to shut down the conversation when you call someone a racist, anti Semitic. It's like, let's let's debate my argument instead of just saying these buzzwords. Speaker 0: Yeah. Now the whole thing that started in Israel I mean, before we get in that, I mean, I was looking at some videos. I came across some videos explaining the history of Yeah. Israel, and they actually used to be called Palestine. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: And Arabs, Jewish people, and all people, they're there in harmony, I think. I think there was For the Speaker 1: most part, yes. Speaker 0: It wasn't. And then after World War 2, a lot of European Jews. Mhmm. They say majority of them was Ukrainian Jews. Speaker 1: Right? And they Went back to their homeland even though they're Ukrainian. Speaker 0: Right. Yeah. They're European, and they put them in Palestine and they renamed it Israel. But to take a step further, they displaced a lot of people that was already living there. They went to the Gaza, West Bank, and now Israel, formerly known as Palestine. Now they're getting 1,000,000,000 of dollars. We gave them nukes. We gave them all the support, but Speaker 1: they actually they actually stole our nuclear secrets. Secrets. We didn't give them to them. JFK was trying to shut down the program. And Oh, really? Every time he got shot, another coincidence. Speaker 0: Oh, man. Speaker 1: But yeah. No. The real back to the history real quick. It was, it was almost it was well, the Jews hadn't been there for 1400 years. So there wasn't Jews there in the biblical time. They've been gone for 1400 years. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And then 18/97, I think it was the Jewish Congress had a meeting. They decided they wanna try to take that land. And then it was financed by, the Rothschilds and other Jewish bankers. They had crazy amounts of money. Mhmm. So they were going in there buying land, and they started sending, slowly sending Jews over there. So it wasn't a lot of Jews till 19 twenties. And around the 19 thirties Speaker 0: Oh, okay. Speaker 1: Forties when they started really being problems. That's when they started forming like armies, because they could buy top grade weapons Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And started trying to cleanse people, and they started doing a terrorist attacks. Speaker 0: They're the Speaker 1: ones that brought the terrorism to Middle East. They, they had the largest terrorist attack. I think nothing beat it till, like, the eighties or something. They bombed, a big English hotel killing, like, 90 something 1,000 people. They were kidnapping, British soldiers and hanging them. Like, they're doing the same shit Hamas is doing. Speaker 0: Yeah. How true is that? Like, when this conflict just started, when it got, ramped up, it was a hospital was attacked, And they blamed it on Hamas attacking their own people. Yeah. I think How true was that? Speaker 1: That one was hard to say. I can't say a 100%. I know 99% of the horror is going on there. It's definitely them just you can look at the aerial thing. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And they say, oh, we're targeting people. If you look from an aerial view, they've completely just demolished the entire Gaza Strip. Speaker 0: Hamas. We don't Speaker 1: under yeah. No. No. Israel. The idea. The thing is the Gaza Strip's really small. It's there's no way out. It's like a tiny strip of land, and they're just bombing it. Women, children Speaker 0: These people are unarmed. They have no weapon. Speaker 1: Yeah. They've killed over 15,000 children. I don't know how how many, like, Christian and stuff, these Christian Zionists can support this and make excuses for it. It's just it's disgusting, you know. Speaker 0: Well, their argument is not happening. It's all a lot. Speaker 1: That's crazy. Speaker 0: You know the biggest thing I hear them say? They said they're using these kids and people's grandmas as human shields. And they're just collateral damage. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like someone says, what what good example is, like, what what say if I shoot at you and then I run hide in the school and you're like, oh, let's bomb the school. He's using the school as, Speaker 0: That's a perfect Speaker 1: You're using this you're using Speaker 0: this yeah. Speaker 1: He's killed a 100 kids because I ran in the school. That Right. There's there's, yeah, there's people mixed in with Hamas, but you're just gonna bomb everyone. It's, Yeah. Speaker 0: It doesn't give you the right to kill people indiscriminately. Speaker 1: Yeah. Another thing is there's k. There's the it's really confusing because there's Gaza and there's the West Bank. The West Bank is not ran by, not ran by Hamas, not by terrorists, but they're using this going on right now to go in and and kill people and stuff. Mhmm. And the West Bank, steal homes. Mhmm. They've been stealing homes there for, like this shit sounds so ridiculous. You have to look it up. They'll go in there and just keep people out of their home. So Jewish person can come in from New York, come there and just take it home. Tell a Palestinian family you have to leave. Imagine if you're there with your, like, wife and kids Right. Speaker 0: They go Speaker 1: in there, like, hey, you guys gotta leave. If you don't, have the idea of kill you and call you a terrorist. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And that's they're calling these people terrorists when they're coming in, stealing their homes, demolishing their homes, taking land. It's, Speaker 0: Why don't, conservatives acknowledge this? I think they just because we all all 3 of us is conservative and but Speaker 1: They don't realize what's going on. Speaker 0: You would think conservatives would notice that because we're so big on to, you know, fake news from the left. Why don't they see it from my standpoint, from this standpoint? Speaker 1: People are very, private people, they wanna jump in and follow what their side is. Right. I think part of it is, you know, like I said, the left, a lot of the free Palestinian people are the same people that were BLM and all this. Exactly. So they're like, oh, these guys are idiots. I'm not falling for this. Speaker 0: Right. I think you hit the nail on the head. Yeah. But that that statement, free Palestine makes so much more sense to me after I did my research. I'm like, why do you keep saying free Palestine? Mhmm. I didn't even know Palestine existed until I did my research. Speaker 1: Yeah. They don't. Well, I think the Jewish bankers bought, I think, like, 5% of the land there. Mhmm. And then they struck a deal with the UN to give them the land. Like, like, who's the UN to give it to them? So they just they Speaker 0: Why do they have the right to give that land Speaker 1: to them? Exactly. Because the bankers bribed them. You know? It's the the Rothschilds and other rich bankers that were funding it. I think they made it the the was it the Balfour declaration? It was during World War 1. They needed loans from the banks, so they they would they signed something to the Rothschilds. They were like, okay, we'll give you Palestine. But they knew it was wrong, so they held off another like 20, 30 years because they knew they couldn't just because they'd also made a deal with the Arabs for, you know, other, Arabs there to give all the land back to them. So it's it's such a complex it takes hours and hours of researching it to start seeing it Right. Down the rabbit hole and I started being like, wow. I was so wrong. I was like fully against these people thinking they were. And again, Hamas has done some terrible things. We're obviously not gonna defend everything they they did. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: But imagine if your kid got his arms blown off and stuff, and you're stuck there, get You're probably gonna start siding with these people. Yeah. Speaker 0: I'm here with this one argument that I heard that they said, about the Palestinians. Why don't you stand up and fight back against Hamas? I'm, like, wait a minute. The US has given Israel 1,000,000,000 of dollars to fight Hamas. They still have that problem. What makes you think Palestinians are gonna be able to stand up and fight against Hamas when they're not being financed or subsidized by anybody? And I think it's They don't even have an army. Yeah. And I think it's disingenuous to say Palestinians are are terrorists. They have nothing to do with it. Speaker 1: No. I I I personally know a lot of pal like, I know a lot of Palestinians and Jewish people. To me, they're all equally human. Speaker 0: But I Speaker 1: think a lot of people have dehumanized the Palestinians to, like they literally call them animals and stuff. It's like it's just disgusting when you personally know some of these people. Speaker 0: Like I Speaker 1: said, I see people, you know, demonizing Jews as well, which that's off also bad. There are there are there are other group seeing Israel do these terrible things, and they're like, oh, Jews are demons and stuff. And it's okay. You don't wanna dehumanize either side. Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. Speaker 1: But the ones the people that are, Israel is the one that's mastering these people. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Another interesting thing is how did the mosque get through the the border? I've been to Israel. They have the most secure borders Speaker 0: in the world. Speaker 1: And then didn't the military not respond for, like, 7 hours or something? Right. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: It's like, give me a break. Speaker 0: It's That was a Speaker 1: little break. They they let them through. They let the attack happen. They came through. We don't know. Israel killed a bunch of them with their own helicopters. We don't know how many. Speaker 0: So the whole thing is I've heard some conspiracy theories about that. They said they want to distract the attention away from the what's going on in Ukraine. Because they said this doesn't make sense. You got the best security. Your borders is is secure. How the hell did these people able to, come up with this strategy and come and take out all these people Oh, hang gliders. Speaker 1: Yeah. With hang gliders and, like, no real army and, you know, the hostages. This doesn't add up. In the military Israel is really small. Like, the army's everywhere. There's, like, it's so militarized. You know, when I went to somebody's, like, border places, there's guys everywhere with machine guns, tanks, and supposedly they came into a festival for hours, like, with with no one answering. I just I just don't believe it. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Like, you had forever to shoot these people down on a hang gliding. Speaker 1: Yeah. Hang gliding in. Like I said, it's the most militarized other than maybe North Korea. Yeah. They're way more sophisticated than North Korea. It's just like Yeah. Doesn't doesn't make any sense. Yeah. Also, Netanyahu, there's leaked files from WikiLeaks where he propped up Hamas because he didn't wanna he didn't want a government that would negotiate with him and have to try to make a 2 state solution because that's what a lot of people wanna do. Give them I'm saying Trump wanted that. Sec secret yeah. They wanna yeah. Trump wanted that. Exactly. The word Speaker 0: You know what's funny? They say I'm I'm pretty sure they say you're anti Semitic. Speaker 1: Oh, of course they do. Speaker 0: And a lot of these people have hijacked the term anti anti Semitic. Jewish community has, co opted that term. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Hijacked it and used it for their own purpose. You could only be anti Semitic when you're referring to, you know, trying to, undermine Jewish people. It's never you can't be anti Semitic if you're undermining, Palestinians or Arabs, which Semitic means only thing only thing it means is people from the Middle Middle East. Right? Speaker 1: Yep. No. You're 100% right because actually most Jews are actually more your more closer to European descent. Mhmm. The Palestinians are actually Semites. That's the funny part. They've made this word up. Also, no other race has their own word for racism. That's a little weird. Right? Yeah. There's racism, but then we have a separate word for Jews. Speaker 0: Yeah. We got the definition of Semite. Right? Semitic people or Semites is an obsolete term for an ethnic, cultural, or racial group associated with people of the Middle East, including Arabs, Jews, Acadians, and Phoenicians. Whatever the hell that is. Speaker 1: Yeah. I know what they are. I need to do a little bit of study apparently. Speaker 0: Right. But people when when people think of anti Semitic, it only applies when you're talking down to Jewish people. A lot of people don't realize it's talking down to Muslims. So Yeah. Canadians and all of them. Yeah. But you're not talking down to them. You're just criticizing them. Speaker 1: I'm just pointing out things I see, you know, and I and that's they've done these people have power. It's a very, very small group of Jewish people. They have a lot of power, you know. And how they got the power, it's, you know, that's still trying to figure out. I think some of it has to do with, like, the banking. It looked back like the Rothschilds. The money. Yes. They have all money Speaker 0: behind that. The root of all Speaker 1: evil money. Exactly. The banking and the fact that they can pair politicians off through APAC. There's also heavy blackmail involved with, these Jewish, Israeli things like Epstein. Anyone who's paid attention knows that. Speaker 0: He was Jewish. Right? Speaker 1: He was Jewish, but his, it gets way more complicated than that. Jalal, Maxine Rever. Her dad was a big, Mossad agent who, the lawyers were all Israeli. Like, everything tied to is is, well, here's an interesting name, well, off subject. But the father of, Maxwell and then the father of, secretary what's their secretary state blinking right now? Mhmm. They have the same attorney. So this guy is Biden's not running the country. We agree with that. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Everybody knows that. He's not tweeting anything. Speaker 1: That means underneath him, the top person is Anthony blank Blinken. It's a little concerning to me. Speaker 0: Right. This is so alarming that nobody's been indicted his, his clients. Only him and a select few of people was given immunity, but nobody on his client list has been exposed. Speaker 1: Yeah. He's running this giant blackmail operation, and that's when they raided the FBI raided his, his, house his whole house is full of all these hidden cameras. Yeah. These little pea pools. Speaker 0: Hidden camp. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. And they had in his, safe, he had these discs with all these names on it. Speaker 0: Right. Like, I Speaker 1: don't know how many 100 something or something. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: It's in the actual official report. Right? Right. These all disappeared. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So where so how did the FBI just lose all these Speaker 0: And then this son of a bitch dies in prison and somebody cut the camera down. Speaker 1: Yeah. Right? Both the cameras, both the guards fell asleep. It's like Speaker 0: it's a heavy coincidence. Speaker 1: Yeah. I've seen I've seen didn't kill himself. You know, it's just wild. There's so many coincidences. Yeah. You say it's like there's there's there could be a few coincidences. There's too many of them. You start to be like, something's a little off. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. We got Yeah. Yeah. We got an important announcement for you. A damn important announcement. So do the value of the American dollar is getting weaker and weaker. And don't believe Biden in his line media. He's a liar. Yeah. When he tell you there's no inflation. Place is going crazy. Look. You see it all around you. You got grocery bills, the good estate market, gas price. Everything's going up. Everything going up. Yes. Cost of shrink for a dollar went down. Just like y'all, we've been trying to find a different place for our money to keep you secure. Because every day, the Fed printed money. Yeah. Like it's nonstop. Like it's monopoly money. And, of course, mainstream news outlets. Yeah. They ain't gonna talk about it. Yeah. They're not gonna cover it. So we go to doctor Kurt Elliott for all our economy updates. That's a damn good white man. Damn good white man. That's a damn good wife, man. And he's smart too. There he is. Doctor Kurt Elliott is a precious metals expert and has been working in the gold and silver market for over 20 years. That's a long time. Yeah. 20 years? Yeah. That's why we partnered with doctor Kurt. Go to hearts twinsgold.com. Signing up is totally free, and doctor Kurt's team of advisers will listen to all your concerns you may have about your economic future, talk you through the right plan that especially fits your needs. Go to harsh twinsgold. Harsh twinsgold.com right now and secure your economic future today for you and your family. Man, I wish I had me some gold in my basement. Yeah. There's a video on your Twitter. Yeah. I mean about real estate. Yeah. Now your your Twitter feed is crazy. I love it. Yeah. Yeah. Can we play that? Read the tweet up. Speaker 2: Hi. My name is Rich Siegel. I'm a 25 year homeowner here in Teaneck. I'm Jewish. The reason that I'm telling you that I'm Jewish is because I have a concern about something that's going on in the Jewish community. On March 10th, there is scheduled to be an Israeli real estate Sales Event at the Keter Bara synagogue. That event violates both domestic law and international law. Violates domestic law because we had a Civil Rights Act in 1965 and a Fair Housing Act in 1968. We don't allow real estate events to be for whites only or Jews only or anybody only. Now as Jews, we don't get to fly under the radar and break the law and hide it in the synagogue. It violates international law because, Westbank settlement homes are going to be available for sale at this real estate event. On the website, it lists 3 different West Bank settlements. Those settlements are in and of themselves illegal by international law. If we allow this sale to go through, we are enabling a local synagogue to violate both domestic anti discrimination laws and international law. Now, there's other reasons we shouldn't allow it, okay? There's a genocide going on right now. I don't care who that offends. More than 35,000 people have been killed, More than 13,000 children have been killed. People in this community are in deep mourning. People in this community are angry. I'm angry. What this real estate event is going to do is it's gonna fan the flames. If it goes forward, there will be a demonstration. I know there's going to be a demonstration because I'm going to organize it. It will be very well attended. What I'm saying needs to be done is I don't know how much power this mayor and this council have to actually shut down the event, but I know you have the power to recommend that it be shut down. And I'm asking you to please do it. We don't need to have more divisiveness in this community. Okay? We don't need to have Jewish privilege rule the day by saying we're entitled to break the law and have this real estate event and not care about how so many people in this community feel about it. Thank you for letting me speak. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. It's pretty crazy. There's, you know, selling homes for Jews only. Speaker 0: In the West Bank? Speaker 1: Yeah. The West Bank, that means these homes owned by Palestinian families living there. So you can buy them and then they're gonna kick them out. And the armies do it as a forum. It's just it's absolutely wild they do this. The second you know, and the conservatives who talk about second amendment be like, I would defend my land. They're calling these guys terrorists, getting kicked out of their home. It's like, people just they're just not educated on what's going on. I think it's it's hard to admit you've been fooled for all of us. I hate it when I'm wrong about something, something really wrong. When you when you reflect and you're like, damn, I had that I had that it's kind of embarrassing. You know? But I Speaker 0: think Speaker 1: people need to really look. Speaker 0: I had to admit I was wrong. I was a Democrat for for years. Yeah. Then I started listening to the other side. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. I kinda leaned. I was never hard into politics, but kinda leaned, leaned Democratic. Dude, I would never stand in line voting Speaker 0: for Al Gore because I thought George Bush was racist. I vote for Clinton, vote voted for Al Gore, voted for Hall and Pooh. Speaker 1: I did vote for Al Gore. It's kind of embarrassing. I know, man. Speaker 0: He was a robot. I don't even think he was running. Speaker 1: At least. But wait. I was just George Bush. George Bush is pretty bad, though, too. So Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's how we got the 1st black president. That dude man, this dude sucks. Let's give this Negro a shot. He was even more Yeah. If you Speaker 1: don't well, if you don't follow politics, all the, you know, the celebrities are all pushing the Democrats. So you just see this, this, this, and you're just like, oh, I I guess that's the that's the good team. Speaker 0: Yeah. Do you think it's a too strong of a word to call it a genocide? Speaker 1: Not really, man. I think the massacre they're doing, I think they're just doing it slow. They know they can't kill them all once. They're trying to slowly massacre them. They're they're waiting for someone in Europe or Middle East. I'm like, I will take them. Speaker 0: Yeah. No matter how you killing it. Children. Yeah. That's a genocide. No matter however you spend it, it's ethnic cleansing. No. It's just it's I mean, that's a that's a euphemistic word for genocide, but that's what that's what's going on. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think, you know, if they could internationally, they would just drop, you know, they would go and just massacre every single one. They would. Because I wanna look good. So trying to do it slowly to get them out. Speaker 0: You know what? Conservatives, we're supposed to be pro life. Yeah. It comes off like such such a contradiction because you care about more about babies inside the womb instead of outside. You got thousands tens of thousands of children being murdered, and you're okay with that. Speaker 1: Yeah. Being a conservative has been really disappointing and seeing all the all the politicians to, and all every politician I see defending it, I go and look and track their APAC money, and I see how much they've been paid. And this is money coming directly from Israel, Speaker 0: which Speaker 1: is supposed to be illegal. You know, Russians can't can't pay our politicians. But why but why do we let Israel pay? It's absolutely insane. Speaker 0: That's a great point. Speaker 1: If you would just sit back and act like it's no big deal. Speaker 0: If the republics got any kind of money from Russians, but they get it from Israel, it's completely fine. They pay Speaker 1: both sides of the problem. APAC pays both sides. And they openly brag on their own website. They win 98.7% of the people they pick because they have so much money to fund and pump in. So people so everyone's scared of APAC. They jump in and they want APAC to support them. Yes. Speaker 0: Other than Speaker 1: a few people, Thomas Massie has been good. There's only a couple of politicians. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. That's crazy. And I I I'm not I I don't hate Jewish people. I'm just like, I just hate when I see somebody's this disadvantaged, being taken advantage of. Not only did you displace all these Palestinians that was recently there, that made up Jews, Arabs, and and so forth. Now you're going into the West Bank, and now you're taking that land from. Speaker 1: Mhmm. And the West Bank has no Hamas. People don't realize that. No. Like, oh, well, it must be Hamas. Like, this is a separate part. Because they've already taken most of the land, and now they're just couple little sections. There's a tiny little strip left in the Gaza, and there's these tiny little strips in the West Bank, and they're slowly just suffocating it all. And we're and we're the world's gonna allow it because they pay all the politicians. Speaker 0: Yeah. And you Speaker 1: know, I love Trump at all. He takes a lot of money from Israel too. Yeah. His top donors or or Israelis or tied down the Israeli government. Speaker 0: Yeah. He does. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's one of the situations you see as frustrating. And like I said, also, there's the black blackmail element. It's, you know, like I said, Epstein, but this is something, you know, the Jewish mafia has been doing for a long time. Speaker 0: The They're doing that here in Vegas. Right? Yeah. They have Jewish mafia. Speaker 1: The Jewish mafia are some of the main funders founders of Vegas. It was like they were as big as Italian mafia, but for some reason, can't figure out why Hollywood doesn't make any movies about it. I'm not sure who runs Hollywood, but Speaker 0: Yeah. It's definitely not the Jews. Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. But Lansky had black belt j j Edgar Hoover, one of the founders of the FBI who ran it for for 37 years. She was a complete dictator to FBI. Right. He had the dude dressed like a woman giving, like, someone a blow job. This is like this is like a known thing. He read blackmail operations, and he had J Edgar Hoover. This I reckon people will look this up because they're not gonna believe it. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: He had him blackmailed. So that's why he could do that's all the mafia went to jail. Meyer Lansky never went to jail. So blackmail has been something they've been doing for a long time. And he was tied up with Israel too. This new well, the new the new p d d stuff coming out. I haven't Yeah. Fully tracked that. But behind that, his right Speaker 0: hand is It seems like R Kelly 2.0. Right? Speaker 1: It seems okay. I I I'm still new to it, but it's looking like he ran this kid. All these hidden cameras, just like Epstein. All these big celeb Peed. Speaker 0: I'm Speaker 1: yeah. I'm not gonna I'm not gonna say any names because I don't wanna say dudes. So you got these dudes fucking dudes. I don't know how I got him to do that. Apparently, there's a bunch of men fucking each other. Maybe some underage people too, but I think it's mostly gay shit going on. And then he has it all on camera supposedly. Speaker 0: What? Speaker 1: I guess, both he's done maybe killed some people and stuff too. It's it's wild. You start digging down the rabbit hole. And the guys that were funding that were also happened to be from the same little tribe. Another coincidence. So it's, that stuff's new, so it's still coming out, but it looks pretty bad. The head of his security was also at 21, was placed the head of security of Michael Jackson Speaker 0: was the Speaker 1: first guy to come to his body. So he started being, like and I started going down to Michael Jackson. I was a 100% convinced he was a pedo. I started going down that rabbit hole, and it's looking very, Speaker 0: I'm Speaker 1: not gonna say he's not, but it's looking like it might have been fed a lie on that one too. He started speaking against the same people. He started saying, you know, these, you know, he started saying these leeches are stealing my money, and then he praised Hitler like like, Speaker 0: Yeah. The media, they can make the innocent look guilty. They can make the Yep. Guilty look innocent. Look what they're doing to Trump. Speaker 1: Yep. Yeah. Exactly. Trump's a good example. And that's why these the the conservatives not realizing that is ridiculous. I think Malcolm I can't remember the exact quote, but Malcolm X is great. That. Yeah. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: I like him. Malcolm X is actually I like him. Yeah. But he said some good shit. He wasn't a big fan of some of the same people. Speaker 0: Although, I Speaker 1: don't know, like, n double c He's Speaker 0: talking mad about the Democrats. Speaker 1: Yeah. N double a c p and stuff. Those are Jewish organizations. Black people didn't fund that. Wow. That was funded by Jews and ran by Jews for 60 years. And that's what he called out all that. And, you know, like, Martin Luther King did some great things, but he was also controlled by them. Speaker 0: Yeah. Morgan Speaker 1: Stanley. Was like was this legit person. Speaker 0: I didn't knew that. I did not Well, Speaker 1: I know all this till either. NAACP was founded and ran by Jews for the 1st 60 years. Speaker 0: Makes a lot of sense, don't it? Speaker 1: That that's why Malcolm X didn't like all that. So he's saying, he's like, you aren't real black movements. You're just controlled. Speaker 0: Hey. Right. Margaret Sanger. Mhmm. Well, she wasn't Jewish, was she? Speaker 1: I don't know, but my guest would tell me probably. I have no idea. I have no idea. Well, then she found that to try, wasn't it? To try to give her to black babies? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Originally. Yeah. It was eugenics. Yeah. It was the, cause she referred to black people as being like the weeds of society. Yeah. So did they keep the population down so they start let's call it, you know, empowering women. Empower women and we keep their population. Speaker 1: Baby. Real real empowering. I didn't know this. I heard Kanye talking about that too. I'm like, wait, what? Yeah. Yeah. So Kanye, like, he doesn't explain things good, but he had some great points. Speaker 0: You know yeah. He he had his, he had his reasons. I I'll tell you what, man. He's the only man that see seen make Alex Jones look uncomfortable. That shit was funny. Yeah. Uncomfortable. Yeah. That shit was funny. Speaker 1: Like, I love Hitler. No. No. No. No. What you mean Kanye? Speaker 0: He's like, Speaker 1: don't tell me what I mean. I'm like, oh, damn. This is, this motherfucker Speaker 0: is crazy. Speaker 1: I I did rewatch that interview. I watched what happened. I'm like, what the fuck? I hadn't gone down these rabbit holes yet though. Speaker 0: Right. I know. Me either. Speaker 1: Kanye, the thing is he doesn't I think he feels things, but he doesn't know how to explain things. So he just starts saying all these crazy tangents, Speaker 0: which Speaker 1: might be true, but he's not, like, properly, like, breaking Speaker 0: it down. You know what his biggest problem is? He's a very creative person, very artistic when it comes to expressing yourself. That's why he's able to put music together. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: He says things that's so artistic and it goes over people's heads. Exactly. And it hurts him. He talk he talks metaphorically. Yeah. He talks a lot of metaphors. He's very deep thinkers deep speaker, but Yeah. Look at Trump, how Trump talks. He talks down to his honest so everybody can understand. Mhmm. Kindly can run a lot from, Trump because he's not he's not artistically speaking, use metaphors, anything like that. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Like, I've been a huge fan of him for a long time. So even though that I was a little unhinged there, but I still, like, oh, I don't he's just a little bit off, and he's cut oh, he's coming from a place of hate, and I really don't. Yeah. Speaker 0: He's ever coming from a place of hate. I think he See, that's that's a red flag you should always look at when you're, getting in politics. Like, the left does that. They like to label stuff as being racist or anti semidical. We're not just racist. Right? To, to minimize what you're saying. And that's what a lot of the Jewish community does against anybody who criticize them. Yeah. Whether it's true or not. They use the same tactic as the LGBTQ. Yeah. That same tactic. Speaker 1: Well, you know, another thing that's comparable to it is a good example is, let's say, you know, I look at these black communities. I can look at them and be like, okay, they commit more crime. Now you could argue what the reasons are. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: It's complicated, but I'm not racist for saying the crimes up there. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So we start saying the same thing with some of these extra Jewish people, they start screaming anti Semitic, but you're just seeing these patterns. Speaker 0: You know? Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: And linking in fairness act what these patterns mean can be complicated. But to say there's not some kind of patterns with the control is just ridiculous. Speaker 0: Hey, pull up his tweet. People run it out of his door. There it is right there. There it is right there. Black lives matter. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Because I'm from I'm from this area. People just people got unhandled. They're weird, like, racial. Speaker 0: Right. Just white people washing black people's feet. Shit. It's fucking weird. Yeah. They don't even close the door. Speaker 1: Yeah. I got all these white liberals calling me racist so I don't have any black friends. Speaker 0: Hey. Read his quote on his tweet. It would be racist to stop there. Speaker 1: That's like the mindset, like in Oakland, Berkeley, fucking San Francisco. The people are just retarded. They think like they think if you're black, like, you can't help being in doing dumb shit. Yeah. And the problem is it's only a it's like so what happens is you have black people realize they can get away with shit. So it's not most black people, but it's a small percentage of black people. They realize they can do Speaker 0: whatever the Speaker 1: fuck they want. Yeah. The cops can't do anything about it. The cops can't profile. Great point. Profile is for a reason. Right? I can profile shady white people or shady black people because, you know, I grew up in fucked up white areas. Yeah. I could see the tweakers up to no good. Same thing with black people. There's certain you might be wrong occasionally, but you can see someone, like, their hood up, look at their windows and shit. You're probably up to no good. But the cops can't profile that now. Speaker 0: Right. Shit. I would. Yeah. Right? I'll be profiling the hell out of nigga. Hey. Speaker 1: You can tell when someone's shady, though. You know what I mean? Yeah. Yeah. Black or white. You could just see shady people. Speaker 0: We worked in loss prevention for years. Right? Renting the shoplifter's. I was undercover. Yeah. I was pretending to be Speaker 1: watch all the black people. Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm I'm walking the store. Right? This is 99% Latino. Right? It's in Orange County, California. Orange County. I'm walking the store looking for somebody to shop there. Soon as I see a Negro come in the store, he's like, yes. Speaker 1: You can just tell by the way they're looking and stuff. Exactly. It's not racism. You could just spot people that are up to no good. Speaker 0: Or if Speaker 1: you're smart, you can. If you've been, you know Speaker 0: You know what? And the first time I ever had a gun pulled on me when I go going out to stop him for shoplifting, guess who it was. It was a black guy. Mhmm. I I stopped and arrested 100 of people over, like how long do we work there? Man, like, 6 years. Yeah. I've arrested probably, like, a 1000 people. The one time I had a gun put on me, a black guy. It's not just Speaker 1: it's it's not cool, like, the BLM stuff. I mean, black people resist, rest more. Just like Yeah. It seems to be that you see all these videos. And I know I'm not justifying what the cops do a lot of these times, but Speaker 0: a lot Speaker 1: of times these guys are fighting back. And for me, I grew up kind of a fucked up white area. Mhmm. One of my friends, you know, white, he got shot by the cops, like, 4 or 5 times. Right. He ended up seeing the living, but it's like so the people telling me, like, oh, you don't know you're white. I would beat up by the cops too. But I was like at the time, I was a shithead when I was a teenager. Right. We were doing fucked up shit. Right. Speaker 0: You Speaker 1: know, I deserve to get the fucking shit out of me. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Possibly my friends deserve to get shot, but he probably did. I think, you know, there's no videos on it. The cops say he tried to run him over. He may or may not have. He was fucking crazy at the time. Right. So it's not Speaker 0: He's good enough to do that. Speaker 1: White. Like, people tell me, oh, you don't know what it's like. All these, like, fucking rich black people that have never it's it's usually the rich ones are the worst ones. I've never lived with any shit. So the college ones tell me, you don't know what it's like. And these guys never fucking don't know what Speaker 0: it's like. Speaker 1: It's not necessarily a race thing. I mean, yeah, it caught my profile a little bit, but it's it's a profile of people causing trouble. They're causing trouble. We got fucking a lot of trouble from the cops. I stopped causing trouble, have no issues with the Speaker 0: cops since. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Now human nature. You guys have Speaker 1: issues with the cops. Right? People will be good. Speaker 0: When I get pulled up, I'll come to my cousin, man. This white man's doing a great job. If I was him, I'll pull me over too. Y'all want a 250? We got you a 250. We have 250. 6.7 liter, power stroke, 37 mixed tires, 20 inch rims. That truck is hung like a horse. 37 minutes. Go to officialhorts2 is dot com. Anything you buy from the site gets you automatic and into the wind. No purchase necessary. Board were prohibited. See if this rules the detail. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think I because I hang out with different people from different races all the time, and I've never noticed being treated different anywhere whether black people, white people. I mean, I guess all the guys, they dress normal, they act normal. Yeah. I don't know. I haven't been places like Mississippi and stuff. Maybe it's different there, but in normal places, it's not. People are treated pretty good if you act respectable. Speaker 0: I don't know how many times I got stopped before I was popular among conservatives and policemen. I would get pulled over. They were just, hey, man. You need to slow down. Speaker 1: Yeah. If you're as long as you're I've I've been taken a couple of times, but, like, 2 thirds of times, the cops will let me go. Speaker 0: Or if Speaker 1: they recognize me, they will. But I've just been fighting and have let me go regardless. Speaker 0: Oh, now when I get pulled up by a cop, they always let me go. Speaker 1: Yeah. Right. So so I I start bullshitting with them. Yeah. Speaker 0: As soon as they come to the hospital, let's slow this bitch down. And let me get a quick self. Yeah. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. Alright. Speaker 0: Famous, fellas. Privilege. Yeah. Famous. Famous privilege. Yeah. Now you got in fight with at our, BLM rally? Speaker 1: The the fight you were talking about earlier is, it's kinda it was a long time ago. It was Speaker 0: a BLM. Speaker 1: Kinda what got me first fall in politics. It was, remember the guy Milo that gave you? Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: So he was given a speech at Berkeley. Speaker 0: Gave you. Well, that Speaker 1: that should have relevance. That's not relevance to the story in a second. You'll see why. Speaker 0: Okay. So Speaker 1: so I get there. I remember the girl that's eating. I know I know who the fuck the guy was. Right. Sometimes he's eating. Also, there's this chaos all around. People are getting beat up all on the streets. So I go running out there. Some guys is all bloody on the ground getting beat. So I run over, start throwing people off. Someone goes running up over the hippie with a bat. Mhmm. Tell the story, but fuck it. I'll tell I'll tell the real story. Speaker 0: I've Speaker 1: always modified it. I turn and swing a punch, drop what I thought was a dude with a bat swinging on me with a mask. I realized I just floored some chicks. I'm like, oh, shit. So I go, oh, I better not go down now. So I started throwing, drop a couple of them because they're yelling, get the Nazi. Soon as I drop a couple of them, they realized, oh, the guy goes, wait. He's not a Nazi. And they all, like, calm down because they're the weakest man ever. Like, they couldn't Yeah. Like, 20 of them couldn't take me with, like, bats and shit. These guys are pathetic. Yeah. But, but, yeah, it's still a little scary because I was there with my girl, and she's talking shit. And I'm like, oh, you're gonna get these guys I guess, these guys are on hand. I'm trying to tell her to get out of there, but she wouldn't leave. So I picked the guy all bloody up off the ground. I shoved him into a store. Some guys helped pull him some Middle Eastern guys shouldn't be relevant. Mhmm. But help pull him in the store, and then some guys run up to, like, knock out the window. Someone goes, stop, stop. It's a person of color store. I've never heard of all this type of stuff. So I'm like, wait, there's a white person store, you'd knock the window out? Like Speaker 0: That's some soft pork shit. Speaker 1: Yeah. And then I like talk to people down that the the end part got caught in video, went hell viral. Like, after the after the aftermath of the fight, we can tell people who just been fighting. It'll be, like, you're telling the fucking you the guys, we know that was way outnumbered. They were still kinda scared by 1 guy. That's how weak these people are. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Like one guy, as you drop a couple people, they're kinda like, I don't wanna fight him. Speaker 0: Dude, like, he got some skills. Speaker 1: Yeah. Then I ran out. Speaker 0: I I Speaker 1: would've kept fighting Speaker 0: because we would Speaker 1: get beat up everywhere. But my girl tried to go to the car, but she wouldn't. She was stubborn. Yeah. So I don't think she Speaker 0: realized her Let me get men in trouble so much, man. I know. Speaker 1: So I went to run to put her in the car because she would've listened. She she was acting up. Yeah. Speaker 0: I see some cops. And I Speaker 1: go, guys guys come back with me. We need to we need to go stop the people getting bit up. Let's go. Let's go. The cops go, oh, no. No. We can't do that. And then I'm like, well, I can't like, no. No. No. You can't go back in there either. I'm like Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: What? Can't go defend these people when the cops aren't gonna defend them? Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. Wait a minute. And speaking of smacking bitches, you you challenged some transgender men in a fight. Speaker 1: 10 of them, and I'm still no takers. No Speaker 0: takers. I think I might have Speaker 1: to throw some of my own money or something to try to give and take it. I've I've challenged the the 10 toughest trans men. So men in any weight class, I don't care how big. 10 of them. 1 after the next, no break. I'll I'll fight them all. I just wanna show the absurdity of you see all these men when when, winning women's competition, but none of them vice versa. So if we're if we're so if the men can compete against women, the percent of the men come, the women come and fight me. They say they're men. They're real men. Literally, I'm I'm 45 and retired. I'll fight the 10 toughest in the world and no takers. One actually publicly called me out, and I sent a DM to him, her, whatever it is. I go, alright. Alright. Let let let's do it. And they go, oh, no. I'm not trying to fight you. I was using your name because I wanna fight a different guy. I follow fighting. I know I have no chance against you, but I just wanna be on the card with you. I'm just then why did you just publicly call me out, you idiot? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Man, it's like I I can't believe what's going on with men being women and competing against women. It's just like it's so it's just it's so fucking stupid. It's like literally half of society are morons. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't think other people support it. Because because even when I live in San Francisco, no one everyone told me privately they don't support it, but they would everyone in the same group told me the same thing. They just wanna say it in front of each other because they knew I was conservative and I wasn't wasn't opposed to it. It was people in their mind. Right. Right. I don't think anyone really supports it. Maybe 1 or 2% of the people I Speaker 0: I know black people don't support it because they homophobic as hell. But then they'll run to the ballot box and vote for a democrat. Speaker 1: Yeah. I know the shits and it's just it's just truly insane, you know, that we're gonna have daughters and stuff that we're just gonna let that we're just gonna let men come and, come and take over the sports. It's just it's just wrong. I just don't understand how anyone everyone in those matches, everyone should be screaming at them, yelling them, calling them a dude, the coaches should be, the other team. They should just be completely ashamed, but people are cowards. They just sit there and allow it. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's what I should have said. People are cowards. Yeah. That's why this it's got this far. Speaker 1: I have people telling me they're scared to like my tweets sometimes. Speaker 0: Hey. I believe Speaker 1: That's how scared they are. Speaker 0: Yeah. You brutal in your tweet too. Speaker 1: Oh, man. Come on. You're a grown man scared. Yeah. I can tweet that. Come on. Speaker 0: Hey, Jake, what do you think like, when you look at the NFL, you look at basketball, you look at, baseball, you see a lot of woke messages. Mhmm. Right? Why you think USC is such a freedom of speech, pro freedom, I think More of a conservative leaning Speaker 1: It's a great question because I never really paid you know, notice that until I think I really should notice it when COVID and BLM hit because the fighters resisted the lockdowns. They, you didn't see the BLM. I think, like, 1 or 2 fighters walked out with it, but we still respected them. It was basically 1 or 2 guys. But as a whole, even most of the black fighters were were pushing the BLM. Mhmm. You know, they were allowed to do it if they wanted to, but as a whole, the UFC wasn't get behind it. It's, maybe the mindset of the hard work. There's there's no there's nothing more real than getting an occasion fighting another man. You can't be in Texas. There's no team. Yeah. I just think something about that getting in there and just fighting a man Speaker 0: I think that's what Speaker 1: it is. Doing that option. It just makes everything just fucking real. Speaker 0: Yeah. The coach of the USA is no excuse. It's usually is man versus man. It's very toxic. Speaker 1: Yeah. There were never really any politics in fighting for the most part, but I think people kinda got forced in it and Speaker 0: Mhmm. You know, Speaker 1: so everyone just happened to kinda be leaning this direction. Yeah. I think that It's just reality, I guess, is what Speaker 0: it is. Yeah. I think a lot of people got forced in politics because they're forcing their politics on them. Like LeBron James before he got political, he said all lives matter. Yeah. He said that. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's hate speech. Yeah. Saying exactly saying my life matters. Yeah. Speaker 0: He picked his ass. Yeah. They say it's a dog whistle for white supremacy. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's just so insane to me. That's that's actually one thing. The ADL, which is the it's the Jewish run organization that the Center for Free Free Speech. That's what first started getting me following this stuff a little bit because they had all this, anti white messaging saying, like, all life matters hate speech. It's okay to be white hate speech. Yeah. Like, that's just ridiculous. I say my life doesn't matter. It's absolutely true. Speaker 0: Yeah. They characterize. That's how they butcher, their criticism. Yeah. Speaker 1: But they're not gonna do that. But they'll say Jewish lives matter, black lives matter. But say white lives matter. You're a Nazi hate speech. That's that that that organization, I started digging into them. Yeah. And they were doing spy operations and shit too. Yeah. Speaker 0: It's all bullshit. Like majority of crimes, hate crimes, this country are fake. Speaker 1: Exactly. So many of them are fake. Speaker 0: I see more hate crimes in Asians and white people. Speaker 1: There's a there's been a lot in, the Asian hate in San Francisco. I'm following that because I was probably Speaker 0: Guess who's committing the majority of it? Speaker 1: Exactly. Black people. That's why it went away because it was almost all black people. Yeah. I don't know exactly what's going on for the something between the black community and the Asian community there in the Bay Area. Speaker 0: Yeah. Like, every time there's a mass shooting, if the person's white, you know within. Maybe an hour. Mhmm. But when there's a person of color or it's a transgender, it takes months, weeks, years. Speaker 1: They they tried not even releasing the transgender, Speaker 0: right. Speaker 1: They tried hiding that out until what? Steven Crowder got it or something? Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. Mhmm. Steven Crowder started digging. Speaker 1: Yeah. Right. Just some real some real reporting. Speaker 0: Yeah. Woah. We got a he she going. Speaker 1: That's crazy how yeah. If it was a white supremacy thing, that would be not right away. Speaker 0: Yeah. Oh, man. But it's a trans thing. Dude. Speaker 1: You wanna hide that. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. But it's it's all this shit is infuriating. Speaker 1: Yeah. We're in a crazy world. And I said, they kinda forced me to politics when they close they close the country down for me. I have, like that was my first stop fighting. I'm living in San Francisco, an apartment. They just closed everything down. I'm like, I can't live like this. I have, like, I have a lot of energy about doing shit. And that was when I was transitioning between, you know, trying to trying to find a new career, that type of stuff. And luckily, financially, I was okay. But it was still, like, I'm in a situation where they tell me to sit around the house all day and that don't work for me. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, you've been retired from fighting, would you what takes up most of your time nowadays? Speaker 1: I do a lot of different stuff. You know, I'm training people, traveling, doing seminars. I do some, you know, complicated, do a lot of business. I I do a lot of business with Jewish people is the funny part. When I first started people in my mind, I'm like, oh, shit. It might be fucked. Yeah. Yeah. But these people are, like, loyal to me because I'm a real friend and people get it I work with. You know? I've never had any, falling out with friends who are politics because Speaker 0: I'm a Speaker 1: real person. So even if I can disagree with something and still be your friend. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. And the things that you say is not is not discriminatory. You just criticize them. Whenever you criticize a group of people for, you know, taking the lives of young children Yeah. People's grandmothers. I mean, you shouldn't be labeled anti semitic or or Nazi. It's just common sense. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm saying they use these bud word these buzz words to silence you. People are scared to be called anti semitic because they know how much power the Jewish people have. Mhmm. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: it's yeah. It's a small group of Jewish people that are doing it. You know, it's not the majority of them. There is a small group that has a ridiculous amount of power. You look at things like all the heads of the top universities, Jewish. Look at Biden. Biden talks about equity all the time. But then you look at his staff, it's almost all Jews. So he's not counting the equity doesn't apply for them. His all all the guys running his government are all Jewish and a and a few black women. Yeah. Black women and Jews. Speaker 0: Black women and Jews. That's not a good combination. Yeah. Right? Speaker 1: That's who's running Biden. That really is who's running Biden's government, though. Speaker 0: It's kinda wild. Hey. How true is it that, like, I thought being a Jew was just your religion. Can I become Jewish? Speaker 1: I tried. They said, hell no. I wanna come a Jewish. I can call people anti Semites and get some free houses and get, like, this privilege. They're just like, hell no. It's to Speaker 0: be Jewish, it's gotta be some kind of nepotism in there. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's basically you're born into it. You there there is a really complex way where sometimes he married you, they'll kinda let you in. They'll be like, I guess, kinda like Trump's daughter. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: So like, I guess, she can be a Jew. But they make it like all this study and you have to get a rabbi to approve. They're not really trying they're not really trying to be Jews. Speaker 0: Gatekeepers that that determine who's gonna be Jewish. Yeah. Like, anybody could be Christian. Anybody could be Muslim. Hindu, Muslim. Mhmm. But not anybody can be Jewish. Speaker 1: Yep. Because when I was trying I was asked on Twitter how to become a Jew, and that's what they're most of them told me to fuck myself, but a couple guys be like, oh, it's a complicated year process. I had one or two guys. If you want help me with the process, just for me a couple years. Speaker 0: So being a Jewish person is not his. It's not just based around religion. Speaker 1: Yes. It's that's what's so complicated. It's more ethnicity. Like most of my Jewish friends are atheists, but but so it's not really religion. Everyone it goes back and forth to confusing people. Is it religion? Is it a race? And there are several different ethnic groups of Jews. There's the main ones we have was the how do you say it? As an Oscar, whatever, which is the the European looking ones. Yeah. The white ones. Yeah. The white ones. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: As white people, and then there's like and that's why everyone calls them white, but then it's like, they don't really see themselves at. Because if you look Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Remember all the self hating white people, all the books that were coming Speaker 0: out for Speaker 1: a while? Mhmm. Someone just sent me a list of all the writers. It was almost all Jewish people pushing all this anti white hate. You're like, damn, this is weird. Speaker 0: Just real weird. Speaker 1: Another coincidence, you know. Speaker 0: Because they are Caucasians. Speaker 1: Yeah. But then they're pushing all the anti white hate. So they're like Speaker 0: That's crazy. Speaker 1: Yeah. So it's Speaker 0: Well, the Jews from that era, the original Jews, they're from Israel, formerly known as Palestine. Yeah. They were not white. No. They look more like Yes. Me and you. Yeah. Speaker 1: And there's some of those guys still around. So they originally a lot of them originally they're not the ones that helped form Israel though. Most of them are living in, like, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, those areas. And there's some crazy things to look at, at least in Iraq, probably over the Middle East. Mhmm. Mas'ad, they weren't all moving there like they wanted. So Mas'ad sent in agents and started bombing the, Jewish communities, blaming it on the Muslims to force people to move there. This is I I know for sure they didn't Iraq. Who could Google, like, the Iraq Mossad bombings. So they were trying to force people to move into Israel because they wanted more Jews to move there. Speaker 0: Wow. Okay. Because there are also some Jews. Speaker 1: The white Jews are trying to get some of the Middle Eastern ones to move in. So they started bombing them. Okay. Speaker 0: They, Speaker 1: I guess, need more people to Israel. So they started bombing Oh, Speaker 0: because they're making like a bunch of white Jews Speaker 1: in it. Yes. They started bombing them, making it was making it look like it was the Muslims bombing them, so they would flee and come to Israel. And this is like documented, you know, there's like relief ports on it. It's just crazy. Speaker 0: Yeah. What's sad is that war do that that situation in Israel, that can never be fixed. Speaker 1: No. It can't really. Speaker 0: It's not like war, all that money we send them, it's not gonna be fixed. It's funding it. Really? Yeah. But it's not gonna fix it, and a lot of that money is not going towards a war. Yeah. It really isn't. Yeah. It's all good. You know? Circa It goes back. Goes back to back to the pack Speaker 1: of money. Politicians Yeah. To get Speaker 0: what they want. Like, conservatives don't realize that. Speaker 1: No. It's They don't. They really need a 2 state solution, but Israel is not gonna give that. They're not gonna give that. They're pretty much already taken almost land. Speaker 0: If you Speaker 1: look at it, there's only time to be left. And right now, they're trying to get the rest of it. Speaker 0: Yeah. And then Speaker 1: there's who knows the original plan of the Zionists when they, 18/97, they plan on taking a bunch of land. It actually includes land in Lebanon, Egypt. Everyone's like, oh, why don't the Middle Easters take them? It's because they want all that land. So once they finish getting Israel, they're gonna start going after more of the land. Speaker 0: You think so? Speaker 1: Well, that's the original plan. Who knows if that's what we're gonna do, but you still see some of the guys some of the guys that your governor mentioned we want they call it in greater Israel. Speaker 0: Mhmm. And Speaker 1: they want that whole land, which that's that's where there's so much tension there. Because they want Syria. Mhmm. Again, the Syrian I couldn't figure out why we're trying to go with the war with Syria a few years ago. Right? We had a we do civil war. We were supplying, the terrorists. We were supplying ISIS with weapons there, who we were enemies with. It was because Israel wanted to overthrow Assad. You know, ISIS never attacked Israel. Speaker 0: And then when we was in the in the war with, was it Iraq or Iran? I forget. Iraq. Yeah. Right? Those weapons that was killing military soldiers were sold by United States of America was it's by, businesses that was owned by the Bushes. Speaker 1: Yeah. The shit's yeah. Speaker 0: The shit is crazy. They actually benefited from the murder of of US soldiers with their weapons that they were selling to the Bush family. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. You go sound some of the stuff. It's just it's insane. Yeah. Yeah. We're giving weapons to kill our own Speaker 0: people and It's crazy to say all these, other nations are so corrupt. We're the most corrupt nation Mhmm. In the world. Speaker 1: We're definitely up there. Yeah. It's pretty bad. I still love my country, but I don't like Speaker 0: people in charge. Best country in the world, though. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't like people in charge, though. Yeah. Get them out. Speaker 0: Yeah. Man, the world is crazy, y'all. World going crazy. Yeah. Food price is going up. Blockchain's breaking down. Biden inflation is making it hard for everyone out here. Biden inflation going to the moon. I can't even afford a damn Cartene. That more than ever, Americans need backup. It's for food. More people than ever are getting ready for potential food crisis. My friends at Heaven Tarpon have put together a damn good deal for y'all. Yeah. Hit the link in the description or go to heart twinsprep.com and secure all the kinds of emergency food, water purifiers, organic seeds, and more. Damn, they selling seeds too. They selling seeds too. He's black old crop. Use promo code, hearts twins, at checkout for an extra discount. These good white people are saving your money, your life. Man, what would we be without white people? Man, that's a that's a dark place. Be Africa. With the way the world is, we've been stocking up on all these things too. We're borderline doomsday preppers now. Yeah. It might seem crazy to talk about needing to purchase food, but it's crazy times we're living in. You'd rather have it not need it Yeah. Than need it, not have it at all. Yeah. So don't wait until it's too late. Go to horseshoeinsprep.com and get your bird's day. I like that quote, man. You know a white man wrote that. You'd rather have it and not need it than need it and not have it. Only person that came over there was a white man. Had to be. White people making America afraid of these. Ustwinsprep.com. What do you think about the border? Speaker 1: It's insane. It's insane. It's like you can't it's one of those things you can't comprehend. Open borders. They just let them just flow in. Speaker 0: I've heard some conspiracy theories that something's about to tap off like a war, and we need soldiers. And the That's the endures there. Yeah. That's what I think. Speaker 1: Yeah. It could Speaker 0: it could be, though. Citizenship. Speaker 1: Well, because most Americans are fat, out of shape. They can't join the army. Speaker 0: Wanna support the, government because look what they do when they got transgenders in the military. Yeah. The, and then you see all these illegals coming into the country. They don't wanna support that. You know what it is? It's that the left's ideology is starting to backfire on it on on the recruitment of On recruitment because their ideology is hurting the American people. Speaker 1: Military was typically right wing people. Mhmm. You're right wing, and they're trying to make COVID is ain't going down. White people suck. Like, why would you join the military? Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. Speaker 1: And this is what's a little scary though if we do start bringing foreign people in. Mhmm. It's a little easier to turn against us, Matt. Right? And a lot of Americans aren't gonna turn on us. You know, you would hope at least. Speaker 0: Yeah. But if Speaker 1: they have people from all these other countries and they say, hey. Go start start killing Americans. They're a lot more likely Speaker 0: to do it. Yeah. I see a lot of people from China coming here. From China. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's like Africa. How are they getting over here from Africa? Someone's obviously orchestrating that. They're not getting across Speaker 0: And none of them speak the language. I'm like, how the hell is he? How do you go get a job? Yeah. Speaker 1: And it's not just it's being done intentionally. I don't know, like, why, what they're, it's I'm disappointed in the Republicans too. They pretend to care, but they just shut down the government. Yeah. So while instead, they try to pass funding for Ukraine and Israel and nothing for the border. Remember everyone was mad because they're only giving 20 for the 20,000,000,000 for the border? So they go, oh, everyone's mad. Okay. Instead, we'll give nothing. Speaker 0: Oh, you Speaker 1: guys mad about this? We'll give you nothing and give it all to Ukraine in Israel. Yeah. And we're what? 34,000,000,000,000 in debt? I don't think people understand how big a deal that is because they think we could just keep adding it up. The problem is there's interest on it. So the interest payments are now blowing up so heavy that that alone won't be able to pay the, we won't be able to pay it off our taxes with the interest. So they'll also print more money, which will cause hyperinflation. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: We're about 10 years off from, like, major major hyperinflation. So Speaker 0: Dollar's gonna crash. Yeah. That dollar's worth I mean, it's still worth some, but it's it's just gonna Speaker 1: Look how bad inflation's been last couple of years. I mean, I'm sure we're we're all doing fairly well. And I walk into stores sometimes, you know, dress on, and you look at the price, and like, what the fuck? Speaker 0: Imagine you're Speaker 1: getting by, like, in a tight salary like I used to be. I couldn't imagine that. Speaker 0: And you know what the and you know what the sad thing about it? People's they got all their money in the banks. They're saving all this money, and slowly, they're losing that money. It's appreciating. Like, 90% of our net worth is not in the bank. It's in houses, cryptocurrency, stocks, stuff like that. I don't keep my money in bank because I know that money is what did he call it? Losing money. You it's losing its value through inflation. Losing money is safe. They say it's losing money safe. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. You gotta be making, like, 10% just to be staying even. Speaker 0: Just to stay even. Speaker 1: It's crazy. Speaker 0: Yeah. That's a fucked up world. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, they printed all the money during COVID and people then they go, oh, we don't know why it's inflation. Like, we know Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: You know? Smart knows it's, you know, how much the circulation. So if you print more, it's gonna be worth less. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's like Speaker 1: Everyone knows that, or you should know that. Speaker 0: Well, you gotta explain it to most people. They're dumb. Like, let's say you're playing a game of monopoly. Everybody's got money. You throw double the money in there. Now you got more money. The price of everything goes up. That's what happens. Mhmm. But people don't understand that. And then Biden stands up and says, hey. I'm a fix this. You can't fix that. No. Yeah. You can't. Only way you can fix it is stop printing all this money, take down majority of money that's in the supply, and burn it. Mhmm. Yeah. But he he doesn't care about inflation. If he get cared about inflation, he would stop sending all these money to foreign countries because, eventually, that money comes back to America as inflation. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Look how much we're giving to Ukraine, Israel, and then we're spending on legal aliens. Yeah. They're getting they're getting free health care in, California here. Speaker 0: Taking away, Ola Yeah. America's business. Speaker 1: They can't they're getting free homes, free hotels, food. I mean, I don't I don't blame the legal aliens. I would come across too if I was in a shitty country, but blame the politicians. Yeah. You know? Right. Speaker 0: If I was in a shithole country. Would you Speaker 1: say that? Speaker 0: I don't see, this doesn't open the eyes of black people because democrats, promise, hey. Reparations. They wanna do if they really want to do that, they could do that. But they're not you know, it's just deployed. Speaker 1: I was I was strongly get preparations. I still am. But I would much rather give black Americans reparations and money to Ukraine and Israel. Yeah. Calls me and legal aliens. Speaker 0: I would tell you right now, Cadillac stock is gonna go through the roof. Everybody gonna have a Cadillac, rims, weed. All the weed gonna be out of the weed stores, man. The crackers gonna be off the shelf. I'm I'm Speaker 1: a start selling grills. Speaker 0: I'll start selling grills. I'm like, I'm a crack dealer. Speaker 1: We'd have to get on that to figure out what business to get in right Speaker 0: now. Yeah. Yeah. I'm all for the American first, man. But yeah. Damn. Speaker 1: Yeah. They're not America first. And even, like, Carrie Lake who pretended like she was America first and sweeten out, like, bashing some politician for not giving money to Israel. I'm like, I thought you were America first. Speaker 0: Yeah. Right. It's like it's so much Yeah. Speaker 1: It's that bad thing not to give money to Israel? Can we take care of our our people first, our veterans, our, you know, our homeless? Speaker 0: The money we spend overseas in Israel, Ukraine and I'm not for this. On the Immigrants. On Immigrants. I mean, everybody in this country could have free health care. But I'm not a I'm not I'm opposed to it because I know what free health care looks like. I used to be in the Marine Corps, and I used to use the veterans benefits. And that's my first taste of free health care because those people treat you like garbage. Speaker 1: Damn. It sucks. They treat you like garbage. Get treated like trash? Speaker 0: Yeah. You just like a number. It's just like, when you get in a auto accident. DMV. Yeah. When you get an auto accident. Speaker 1: DMV. That that's terrible. Speaker 0: Yeah. When you get an auto accident, you get a a a attorney to represent you. You ain't number the number to that attorney. Same thing with that, the free health care. You ain't number the number. If you want some health care that's gonna really take care of you, you gotta go out and earn it. You gotta gotta pay for it, unfortunately. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I'm I'm kinda torn in health care. I've it would nice to have some kind of, like, maybe Yeah. Something better. For people where they could get something that doesn't destroy destroy them. But clearly, there's gonna be better health care for paying for us. Maybe have some kind of, like, hybrid. The problem is the insurance It's gotta be a hybrid. People and yeah. It's the problem is it's so infiltrated now with insurance companies. It's just such a mess. It'll be hard to fix. Because America, we pay way, way, like, 2 or 3 times more than any other country for medical treatments. So we're so that no other country pays what we do. Like, I went to, we had a bad staph infection one time. Speaker 0: I had Speaker 1: to go to in Thailand. And I got one in the US too. But when I went to US, it was like $3,000 bill, a 5 hour wait. They didn't treat it treat it. It was terrible. Mhmm. I was scared going to Thailand. Like, oh, it's gonna be gonna be terrible. Instead, it was $200 so, like, way cheaper. The doctor was way more knowledgeable, way cleaner, 0 weight. I was shocked. I'm like, wow. My experience going to Thailand Hospital and US Hospital is 10 times better in Thailand. Speaker 0: Yeah. I was kinda like, oh. Probably better? You you got all these Americans here. Got this free shit. Cash. And they got the line. Yeah. Yeah. I wanna go to Thailand. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a it's a beautiful place. Speaker 0: Yeah. I was thinking some real estate out there. I was like, wow. It's beautiful. Yeah. I'm trying to Speaker 1: get my kids real estate in Costa Rica. You've been down there? No. It's nice down there, and a lot of people kinda, like, free thinking. So I was going down there during the COVID lockdown. So it was people kinda like hippies, but, like, right wing hippies. Speaker 0: It was, like, interesting. Oh, really? Speaker 1: I don't know. You would you would think they would be, like, you know, a left wing, but I think that the COVID and stuff turned them. It was always looking at people, and they'd be, like, hating Biden, liking Trump. You're, like, oh, people are cool. Yeah. Speaker 0: What do you think about this upcoming election? You think Trump's gonna win? Speaker 1: Probably. But they're doing so much weird stuff. Like, I was used to follow all the Trump stuff closely, but there's been so many. I can't even keep up. There's just one thing after the next, like, last one. Speaker 0: That fraud, Casey? They won against him for 300 million? Speaker 1: See, I didn't really follow that closely. I looked at it afterwards. Speaker 0: Oh, dude. Let me explain Speaker 1: to you. Speaker 0: The outlet you explained. Yeah. He got some real estate. He took us a loan on some real estate. Right. He went to bank for that application. They I wanna take out a loan. Here's collateral. Here's some real estate. They give they have come out, appraise his property, give him a loan. Mhmm. He pays back the loan. I think it's I forget how long ago. Maybe a decade ago. Yeah. I paid it. But The the adjust department, New York goes in there, reevaluates that loan, so, oh, this is fraud. This property was overvalued. Yeah. They took advantage of the bank. Speaker 1: And the bank sent their own people out before Yeah. For valuing the property. Yeah. When there's when there's these big money deals, they don't take your word for it. There's no there's literally no fraud. Speaker 0: Like Shit is crazy. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's, like, absolutely insane. Speaker 0: And then he had to pay this other lady defamation over defamation because the lady said she raped him. He said, no. I didn't rape you. Speaker 1: You're too ugly. Speaker 0: They sued him for definite defamation. Speaker 1: Call her too ugly or something. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. They sued him for defamation. Oh, you defamed her because you have this huge audience. Like, he's not allowed to Speaker 1: defend defend your name for girls Speaker 0: shooting rape. Speaker 1: You'd have to be like, oh, okay. I did it. She was pretty crazy. I don't Speaker 0: I don't I Speaker 1: don't think he raped that lady. I don't like Trump. We look at the girls he's with and her. Yeah. No. I don't think so. Speaker 0: Just to show you how ignorant, like, Democrats who support this that that they're doing to Trump, That member's whole tax return, so he's not paying his treasurer. They think Trump is sitting down with a damn 10 40 EZ form doing his own freaking taxes. Yeah. That dude's tax return probably looks like a damn dictionary. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: He's not doing his own taxes. He's got accountant, CPAs, and they evaluate everything. And when you make that amount of money every year, they audit him every year. Oh, yeah. Yeah. He whatever he's doing, whether he's paying little or a lot, he's doing he's following the law. All the laws that Congress passed and wrote, the tax law. But they're trying to demonize him for following the law. Yeah. Speaker 1: That's the thing. They should change the laws they don't want. Because a lot of, like, the people that get screwed are the guys that make, you know, a couple million. The really rich people, they they have all these high attorneys that Speaker 0: have Right. Speaker 1: Because I know a couple of these really rich guys, their taxes. I have all these, like, crazy loopholes to tell me about. Well, they don't pay hardly anything. Speaker 0: Mhmm. So if Speaker 1: they change the laws, they don't like it because that's the laws. But Yeah. I'd Speaker 0: Congress if you got a $1,000,000,000, I'd Speaker 1: do the same thing. Why are you gonna why are you gonna pay more money to the government that doesn't do anything for it? Yeah. Israel and Ukraine and legal lands. Speaker 0: Says it's more patriotic to pay more. Well, they don't pay. They don't put nothing to the system. Speaker 1: Yeah. The people the people say that we don't pay enough, don't pay anything. I think it's over 50% of people pay no taxes. They they say we're not paying our our fair share. They don't even pay anything. Speaker 0: Yeah. Our present tax system rewards the poor and penalizes rich because affluent people pay majority taxes. Like, a mo majority of these people if you get in an earned income credit, you get all these tax deductions because you have kids It means you're poor. It means you're poor. You're taking out of the system what affluent people put in. Mhmm. And it's they still think rich people is not paying that fair share. I can't believe they, honestly believe that bull crap. Speaker 1: Yeah. Because that's just nothing really good going to tax money. We went to a better stuff. I can appreciate it more. But what do we get? The roads are run down. We get to get Speaker 0: the Ukraine get money. Ukraine. Yeah. The immigrants. Mhmm. The Jews. I was sending them Speaker 1: a lot of money. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. That is crazy. Yeah. Well, Jake, man, thanks, man, for joining the show, man. What can everybody find you? Speaker 1: I mean, the most fun place is probably on x or Twitter. Just Jake Shields, ajj. I'm on Instagram too. Don't use that as much. I guess, mostly me in those spots. So Speaker 0: Dude, you need to create a YouTube channel. Speaker 1: I probably should. Speaker 0: I probably do. Speaker 1: I probably get banned. Speaker 0: You got a welfare experience in MMA. You could teach. You could man, you would do so well. You're well spoken. You you got you're about freedom. People will gravitate to you. Speaker 1: Yeah. I kinda got stumbled into politics by accident, but now I'm looking at it like, oh, maybe I should do more stuff in this industry. You know, like I said, ex Twitter started paying a little bit. Like, okay. I guess there is a little bit of money in the political stuff. So Speaker 0: Need the voices, man. Whenever you start YouTube, come back and we will promote the hell out Speaker 1: of it. Perfect, man. I might do that. But thinking like I said I probably should be more involved with since my my mind's interested in politics now. Maybe maybe run eventually. Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't Speaker 1: I don't think I'm getting money from the Jews, though. Hey. I'm sorry, guys. APAC. Can I get some money? Alright. Speaker 0: Thanks for coming, bro. Good day. Speaker 1: Thanks a lot, guys.
print3_d
Posted - March 20, 2024 at 11:27 PM
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 11:39 PM

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

How many others are getting paid on twitter to lie to you? https://t.co/eMXOuKWrgD

@ProjectTabs - Project TABS

Michael Rapaport Admits He Indeed Does Get Paid Money For Pro Israel And Hamas posts or is it a ploy to get us to stop posting pro Palestine content? https://t.co/COJvJdKPBC

Video Transcript AI Summary
I make money from pro-Israel, pro-Zionist, pro-Jewish posts, and get paid more for pro-Hamas comments. I earn extra for comments like "from the river to the sea" or with the Palestinian flag. My deal is confidential, but I profit from certain posts and comments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I you got me. I I I make money off of all these posts. Okay? Yes. I make I make I I don't wanna say how much money I make off of these posts, pro Israel, pro Zionist, pro Jewish post. Yes. I make money per post, and I get paid extra. I shouldn't be saying this, but I get paid extra every comment that's pro Hamas. So every time you guys make comments saying, you know, from the river to the sea or if you post the Palestinian flag or a watermelon, I get paid a little bit more. So I don't know what anyone else is doing. I don't know about their deals, but that that's my deal and I just wanna be honest about it. Okay? I just wanna be honest about it going forward that I do get paid off of of of a very pro Jewish, pro Israel post. When I say free the hostages, I get paid a little bit. I can't go into the details of the deal that I have made with the higher ups. I can't even say who they are, but it is true. And when you comment with Palestinian flags, I get paid more money. When you comment saying propaganda, I get paid even more. That that's all
Twitawoo8
Posted - March 20, 2024 at 10:08 AM
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 11:47 AM

@Twitawoo8 - Sassy red socks

Source: "Dan Reynolds is lead vocalist for the band Imagine Dragons. Elon Musk - illuminati President Harry Styles - illuminati VP Beyonce - illuminati Treasurer Taylor Swift - illuminati Historian Freemasonry is THE veil for worshipping lucifer." They've all got jobs there... https://t.co/c2Oi6pBmD0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Illuminati is real, I'm a member. Imagine Dragons' fame, tired of politics. Risky to share, but honesty matters. Beyonce not with Chris Martin. President Elon Musk, VP Harry Styles, treasurer Beyonce, historian Taylor Swift. That's all I know. Translation: The speaker reveals membership in the Illuminati, discusses Imagine Dragons' success, and shares the organization's leadership roles. Beyonce's relationship status and the identities of key figures are disclosed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the time has come, I'm just gonna break it quick, clean, get it done with. Doesn't matter that I signed a blood oath. Doesn't matter anymore. The Illuminati is real. I'm a member. It's how Imagine Dragons got famous. I'm tired of the politics. It's put puts me at great risk putting this out here and telling you guys this, but I want I believe in full honesty and, Beyonce is not talking Chris Martin. Nobody nobody's saying a word. So there it is. There you know, there. Give you all the details quick as I can. The president, Elon Musk, vice president, Harry Styles, treasurer, Beyonce, Taylor Swift is historian, and, that's it's the the the that's that's all I know.
FringeViews
Posted - March 16, 2024 at 10:24 AM
Saved - March 16, 2024 at 3:39 PM

@FringeViews - Amazing Polly Isn't Here to Compromise

They are deleting things. This was live yesterday. They've also deleted the pages where it shows that Coulson and Lopez are co-owners. They delete a lot, and fast.

@FringeViews - Amazing Polly Isn't Here to Compromise

People are starting to claim that Paul Alexander isn't an official part of The Wellness Company. He is. https://the-wellness-company-canada.myshopify.com/pages/dr-paul-alexander

404 Not Found Healthcare You Can Trust the-wellness-company-canada.myshopify.com
LetsGoBrando45
Posted - March 12, 2024 at 11:06 PM
Saved - March 13, 2024 at 8:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Rothschilds' involvement in funding both sides of WW2 and their role in the formation of Israel is well-documented and easily verified. It raises questions about why a Jewish family would support the Holocaust and then establish a place for Jewish people shortly after. Understanding the Rothschilds' history is important in understanding current challenges.

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

We know that the Rothschilds funded both sides of WW2. ✅ We also know that they helped form #Israel in 1948. Neither of these points are up for debate - Both can be easily verified. So why would a ‘Jewish’ family fund the holocaust of their own people, and then set up a place for the Jewish people shortly after?

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

Here is a brief summary on the Rothschilds family. #WeThePeople need to get this‼️ it’s directly linked to what we were up against today. ✅ https://t.co/6MfqXA8kCu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Rothschilds, a powerful banking dynasty, have influenced world events through control of central banks and vast wealth. They have amassed trillions of dollars, own major corporations, and manipulate markets. The Federal Reserve, established in 1913, was influenced by wealthy individuals like the Rothschilds. Their control extends to media, governments, and the global economy. Their wealth could provide for all humanity. The Rothschilds' influence is vast and secretive, shaping world affairs for centuries.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your article that the Rothschilds had purchased Jerusalem in 18/29. Speaker 1: Rothschild have found, Israel, and Rothschild has always been the backer of Israel. Whatever Rothschild wants, he gets. It it is believed that he is the richest man in the world, and I I have little doubt of Speaker 0: that. In 18/97, the first Zionist Congress was held in Basel, Switzerland. It was shared by Theodor Herzl. Jewish delegates from across Europe agreed that Palestine should be given to them. Prior to his death in 19 0 4, Herzl predicted that a world body will one day give Palestine to the Jews and that he will go down in history as the father of the Jewish state. For Herzl's dream to come true, European military powers would have to be manipulated and used into taking Palestine away from the Ottomans by force. Around 250 years ago, in 17/60, mayor Amschel Rothschild created the House of Rothschild that paved the way for international banking in control of the world's resources. Speaker 2: Money is power. Money is the only weapon that you have to defend yourself with. Speaker 3: Mayer Amschel Bauer, born in Frankfurt, Germany in 1744, was a moneylender and a goldsmith on Jew Street whose shop had a sign out front with a red hexagram on it. Eventually, he would change his name to Rothschild, which is German for red sign. Rothschild soon learned that loaning money to governments and kings was more profitable than loaning money to private individuals. Not only were the loans bigger, but they were secured by the nation's taxes. Mayer Rothschild had 5 sons whom he trained in the skills of money creation and sent out to the major capitals of Europe to open branches Speaker 2: One to go and open a house in Paris, one in Vienna, one in London, choose the most important sectors so that when money is to be sent from here to London, let us say, you won't have to risk life and gold. And here in Frankfurt, we'll just send a letter to Nathan in London saying, aye so and so. And that will be offset by loans from London to Frankfurt. You understand? In your day, there will be many wars in you. A nation that have money to transport will come to the Rothschilds because it will be safe. Our 5 banking houses may cover Europe, but you will be one firm, one family, Rothschilds, who work always together. That will be your power. Speaker 4: Just how rich and powerful is lord Evelyn Rothschild? Historically, the Rothschild family wealth was hidden in underground vaults. The Rothschilds' secret financial records were never audited and never accounted for. Their family commissioned biographies give the illusion that their family fortune has dwindled, But researchers estimate their wealth at close to $500,000,000,000,000 more than half the wealth of the entire world. Besides their many castles, palace mansions, wineries, racehorses, and exotic then bought the Associated Press, which selects and delivers the same news stories to the entire world day after day. They have controlling interest in 3 major television networks and easily avoid media attention since they own it. Until recently, they owned and operated England's Royal Mint and continue to be the gold agent for the Bank of England, which they also direct. They control the LBMA, London Bullion Market Association, where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold worth over $11,000,000,000 are traded daily. The Rothschilds earn 1,000,000 weekly just on transaction fees alone. They also fix the world price of gold on a daily basis and profit from its ups and downs. Over the centuries, the Rothschilds have amassed 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars worth of gold bullion in their subterranean vaults and have cornered the world's gold supply. They own controlling interest in the world's largest oil company, Royal Dutch Shell. They operate phony charities and offshore banking services where the wealth of the black nobility in the Vatican is hidden in secret accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. Although Evelyn Rothschild looks like a harmless gray haired old man, make no mistake about it. Rothschild and his ancestors have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored the mass murder and impoverishment of 1,000,000. The well hoarded by this one family alone could feed, clothe, and shelter every human being on Earth. Speaker 0: The Rothschilds is the head of the snake. Within the city of London, there is a 1 mile square that is referred to as the city. This is the headquarters of the Jewish family, Rothschild's banking dynasty, that owns the money supply through the central banks of almost every nation on earth. In November 1910, 7 of the world's richest Jewish men held a secret meeting on Jekyll Island just off the coast of Georgia to establish a central bank, which they called the Federal Reserve Bank. These men were Nelson Aldrich and Frank Vanderlip, both representing the Rockefeller Financial Empire. Henry Davidson, Charles Norton, and Benjamin Strong representing JP Morgan, and Paul Warburg, representing the Rothschild Banking Dynasty of Europe. There were some powerful men who made abundantly clear that they were not in favor of the Federal Reserve System. Their total wealth today would be worth nearly $11,000,000,000 These were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Aster. Unfortunately, all of them were aboard Titanic when it sank to the depths of the sea. All 3 died that night. By April 1912, all opposition to the Federal Reserve had been eliminated. On December 23rd, 13, after many senators and congressmen had left town for Christmas, the president Wilson signed a bill, and the privately owned federal reserve system came into being in the United States. After Woodrow Wilson had signed the Federal Reserve Act, which gave private interest control over economic power in 1913, he said, I'm a most unhappy man. I've unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world, no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion endures of a small
NC__Rebel
Posted - February 15, 2024 at 9:52 PM
Saved - February 15, 2024 at 11:18 PM

@NC__Rebel - Hunter L. Harvey

BREAKING POLL : PPC vs CPC vs LPC @MaximeBernier vs @PierrePoilievre vs @JustinTrudeau who will wins?

LauraLynnTT
Posted - October 30, 2023 at 10:44 PM
Saved - February 14, 2024 at 5:57 AM

@LauraLynnTT - Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson

https://t.co/u9ervUFX8b

MarkFriesen08
Posted - February 10, 2024 at 4:07 AM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 10:00 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

#ClimateScam. Nice job @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU https://t.co/mO8OCQCSuq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the idea of carbon dioxide (CO2) being pollution is flawed. They state that CO2 is a natural part of the environment and that the proportion of human CO2 emissions is very small. They believe that the notion of CO2 destroying the planet or changing the temperature is ludicrous. However, they suggest that labeling CO2 as pollution allows for regulatory control over all human activities. They mention that CO2 has actually been beneficial for the environment, as stated by a climate adviser. The speaker questions whether CO2 is truly pollution and suggests that the alleged environmental benefits are fictional if it is not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This environmental question depends on, I think, a very flawed fundamental presupposition. It depends on the idea that carbon dioxide is pollution. And I would argue, after interviewing hundreds of scientists, including many who've worked for the UN IPCC, many of the leading scientists in the world, that the notion that c 02 is pollution is absolutely preposterous. We exhale about 2 pounds of it every single day. The the proportion of greenhouse gases made up of human c o two emissions is a fraction of a fraction of 1%. The idea that that is going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the earth, is frankly, in my opinion, totally ludicrous. But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO2 is pollution. There's no human activity that doesn't result in CO2 emissions, including living, including dying, Turning on a light switch, every single aspect of your life then, if we submit to the idea that CO 2 is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claimed to be saving us from pollution. So when they do these environmental studies and they say, well, your CO 2 footprint will be smaller if you eat bugs or you do this, that or the you drive an The car, that doesn't show anything about whether that's gonna benefit the environment or not. In fact, c o two has actually been very beneficial for the environment. In interviewing, Trump's climate adviser, doctor William Happer, a physics professor at Princeton University, he said the Earth is starving for more c o two. And since we've had a little bit of an increase in Pure CO 2 over the last 100 years or so, plants have gotten much greener, agricultural yields have improved. So I I think we need to also Talk about the fundamental presupposition here. Is CO 2 really pollution? If it's not, then all these alleged environmental benefits are completely fictional.
print3_d
Posted - February 10, 2024 at 11:48 PM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 1:20 AM

@print3_d - PRINT3D.

I must being doing something right. Freedom of speech, not reach. https://t.co/CiJTxsjYpf

print3_d
Posted - February 11, 2024 at 12:12 AM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 12:53 AM

@print3_d - PRINT3D.

wrote a letter to X about my "new label" will bug them relentlessly clogging up there customer service lines by intentionally misspelling things so AI can't read it and it has to be done with a human. I will 5000 emails a day if i need to X 👍🏻 https://t.co/Qq8EbuLQgh

print3_d
Posted - May 12, 2023 at 8:08 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, and Pierre Poilievre are seen as part of the "controlled WEF opposition" by the author. They are accused of pretending to be on our side while actually working towards agenda 2030. The author suggests listening to Grimes, Elon's ex, for more information.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

Elon Musk is a Globalist, playing on the same side as Jordan Peterson & Pierre Poilievre. They are what I call the "controlled WEF opposition." They play the good guys, while actually trying to guide us towards agenda 2030. This is Grimes Elon's EX.. listen carefully. https://t.co/YZmJJocVuM

Video Transcript AI Summary
AI could be the fastest way to achieve communism. If implemented correctly, it could solve scarcity and provide everyone with a comfortable life without the need to work. AI could automate farming, eliminate corruption, and bring us closer to genuine equality. It offers all the benefits of communism without the downside of collective farming, which is not desirable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a proposition for the communists. So, typically, most of the communists I know are not big fans of AI. But if you think about it, AI is actually the fastest path to communism. So if implemented correctly, AI could actually Theoretically, solve for abundance. Like, we could totally get to a situation where nobody has to work. Everybody is provider for with a Comfortable state of being, comfortable living. AI could automate all the farming, weed out systematic corruption, thereby bringing us to As close as possible to genuine equality. So basically, everything that everybody loves about communism, but without the collective farm. Because let's be real, enforced farming is really not a vibe.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

print3_d
Posted - January 19, 2023 at 8:47 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pierre Poilievre's alleged connection to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and support for their agenda is questioned in a series of posts. The posts highlight his hiring of WEF-affiliated individuals, failure to remove WEF members from positions, and support from former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Additionally, his stance on issues such as mass immigration and vaccines, which align with WEF goals, is scrutinized. The posts also mention his support for the Ukrainian government.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

1 / 11 @PierrePoilievre is a arm of the WEF who supports the WEF Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's) He like Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh all are on the same team. I will prove these fact on this meme in this 11 Part thread. Scroll down to read.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

2 / 11 If Pierre isn't part of the WEF why did he hire this WEF guy for his leadership race co-chair? 1-https://www.weforum.org/people/john-baird 2-https://web.archive.org/web/20220415002129/https://www.pierre4pm.ca/team 3-https://www.eurasiagroup.net/people/JBaird 4-https://www.eurasiagroup.net/people/gbutts

World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
Endorsements Join me in making Canada the freest nation on earth web.archive.org
Eurasia Group | John Baird eurasiagroup.net
Eurasia Group | Gerald Michael Butts eurasiagroup.net

@print3_d - PRINT3D

3 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why doesnt he fire WEF Michelle Rempel Garner. She said to Trudeau " enough with the woke sh1t" yet she defends drag shows for kids. 1-https://www.weforum.org/people/michelle-rempel-garner 2-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7BxDcpFdjc 3-https://theparadise.ng/supposedly-anti-woke-mp-michelle-rempel-attacks-parents-protesting-all-ages-drag-show/

World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
Page not found | The Paradise News theparadise.ng

@print3_d - PRINT3D

4/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why would he actually appoint Tony Clement a WEF member to the board of conservative fund for the CPC? Doesn't make much sense does it? 1-https://ottawa.citynews.ca/national-news/former-tory-mp-tony-clement-appointed-to-board-of-conservative-fund-sources-582692 2-https://www.weforum.org/people/tony-clement

Former Tory MP Tony Clement appointed to board of Conservative Fund: sources OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has appointed former member of Parliament Tony Clement to serve on the board of the Conservative Fund, the federal party's main fundraising arm, sources say. ottawa.citynews.ca
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

5 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why doesn't he remove Andrew Scheer from the CPC? Andrew scheer was on the WEF website but quietly removed back during the trucker convoy in Feb 2022. 1-https://web.archive.org/web/20220219134642/https://www.weforum.org/people/andrew-scheer

Andrew Scheer Andrew Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as the Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle since 2004 and as the leader of the conservative party and leader of the official opposition since 2017. He was one of the youngest MPs when he was first elected and his vision and leadership have earned him the continued confidence to be re-elected. web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

6 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why did he lie about not having any WEF members? Pierre himself was in fact listed on the "people" section of the WEF website. During the trucker convoy (Feb 2022) he was quietly removed. 1- https://web.archive.org/web/20210401060525/https://www.weforum.org/people/Pierre-poilievre

Pierre Poilievre The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

7/ 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why is he being supported by the globalist WEF member and ex-PM Steven Harper who originally signed Canada onto the WEF's UN agenda 2030 in 2015? (the SDG's) 1-https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/former-conservative-pm-stephen-harper-endorses-pierre-poilievre-for-party-leader-1.6002020 2-https://www.weforum.org/people/stephen-harper

Former Conservative PM Stephen Harper endorses Pierre Poilievre for party leader Former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper has endorsed Pierre Poilievre to be the party's next leader. ctvnews.ca
Stephen Harper Bachelor's and Master's degree in Economics, University of Calgary. 2002, Leader of the Opposition; co-founded Conservative Party and won party leadership; 2006, Prime Minister of Canada. Recipient of awards: Woodrow Wilson Award for Public Service; first Canadian to be awarded B'nai Brith Presidential Gold Medallion for Humanitarianism (2008). weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

8/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why did lie on camera to @MarkFriesen08 claiming that he did "not read" the SDGS. To be clear, PP the "development minster" claimed he did not read the "Social Development Goals" that he voted on multiple times. 1-https://rumble.com/v1vz45q-pierre-poilievre-meets-mark-friesen-and-claims-to-know-nothing-about-the-sd.html

Pierre Poilievre meets Mark Friesen and claims to know nothing about the SDG Clip of Pierre Poilievre flat out lieing when he meets Mark Freisen as he claims to know nothing about the SDG (sustainable development goals) even though pierre was the Minister of Employment and Soc rumble.com

@print3_d - PRINT3D

9/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why is he supported by, surrounding himself with, Hiring, and appointing WEF members if he's working against them? 🧐 1-https://web.archive.org/web/20210401060525/https://www.weforum.org/people/Pierre-poilievre 2-https://web.archive.org/web/20220219134642/https://www.weforum.org/people/andrew-scheer 3-https://www.weforum.org/people/michelle-rempel-garner 4-https://www.weforum.org/people/john-baird

Pierre Poilievre The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. web.archive.org
Andrew Scheer Andrew Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as the Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle since 2004 and as the leader of the conservative party and leader of the official opposition since 2017. He was one of the youngest MPs when he was first elected and his vision and leadership have earned him the continued confidence to be re-elected. web.archive.org
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

10/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why does he support mass immigration, like Trudeau and Jagmeet and WEF globalist's want. This is also another WEF SDG. Why? Immigration will increase housing prices for everyday Canadians and decrease average wages.

@PierrePoilievre - Pierre Poilievre

We have 26,000 nurses who’ve been trained abroad and are ready and willing to work in Canada to fill the health care worker shortage, but they can’t, because gatekeepers won’t let them. Remove the gatekeepers, and let qualified nurses work in Canada. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/major-immigration-backlog-leaving-thousands-of-trained-health-care-professionals-on-the-sidelines-1.6015229

Major immigration backlog in Canada leaving thousands of trained health-care professionals on the sidelines As hospitals across the country struggle under the weight of major staffing shortages, an immigration backlog described by lawyers as the worst they have ever seen is leaving qualified health professionals sitting on the sidelines. ctvnews.ca

@print3_d - PRINT3D

11 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why does he still support vaccines, the UN SDG goal #3? Even when there is ample evidence the 💉 has many negative side effects. Pfizer's own listed side effects (link #2) 1-https://t.co/qlWl1SoQLg 2- https://t.co/f4JRmeQ5JL https://t.co/M1gtLZWxnW

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

Pfizer Pierre in his recent role as part time marketing exec for Big Harma! Critiquing a sitting govt for "not being globalist enough" is the only form of critique that's allowed under a flu d'état regime. #Uniparty

@healthbyjames - James Cintolo, RN FN CPT

Pfizer lists over 1300 side effects associated with their mRNA vaccine — here they are. This is being suppressed…… @Johanne31785773 https://t.co/FKFDbBUdwe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the Prime Minister for not prioritizing vaccines during the crisis. They point out that while the rest of the world was being vaccinated in January and February, Canada's vaccination rates are lower. They blame the Prime Minister for allowing the spread of variants, which has led to restrictions in Canada. The speaker questions why other countries had access to vaccines earlier while Canada did not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Carlton. Well, what they needed is vaccines. Yeah. That was the one job he had at this point in the crisis. Now he tries to throw on a cape and says he's the hero that's going to solve the problem that he caused. Yeah. The reality is the rest of the world was being vaccinated in January February. Vaccination rates in the US and UK are twice what they are here in Canada. The rest of the world is reopening. Well, we're being confined to our basements because of the wave of the variance that this prime minister allowed. Why did the rest of the world have access to vaccines in January February while we did not?

@print3_d - PRINT3D

BONUS 12/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why does he support the dictator in Ukraine Like LPC & NDP? 4 Billion wasted and counting to Ukraine, this increases our inflation and supports nazis that wont win against Russia anyways. https://t.co/GgKyB0Y50z

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@DiamondsQu33n @reSeeIt save thread

greg_scott84
Posted - February 18, 2023 at 7:52 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Conservative Party of Canada appointed Tony Clement, a former MP, to the board of the Conservative Fund, their main fundraising arm. Tony has experience in health and industry, working with organizations like the World Health Organization and Maitri (now Bloom Health Partners), which provides Covid-19 testing and health data management services. Bloom works with major corporations and has clients like PepsiCo, Netflix, and Apple TV+. Concerns arise due to Tony's connections to the World Economic Forum and his advisory role in a company specializing in Covid-19 data management for Fortune 500 companies.

@greg_scott84 - Greg

How is the Conservative Party of Canada connected to Covid-19 testing and smart data management?🧵 1) Read on and find out... https://t.co/Q0qzRtUO68

@greg_scott84 - Greg

2) In September of 2022, CTV News reported that CPC Leader, Pierre Poilievre, appointed former MP, Tony Clement, to serve on the board of the Conservative Fund, the party's main fundraising arm. https://t.co/LLoM1Aaty2

@greg_scott84 - Greg

3) Here we can see Tony listed as a Director for the Conservative Fund along with Robert Staley and Sander Grieve. https://t.co/dSS07wf6QD

@greg_scott84 - Greg

4) Tony has a profile page on the World Economic Forum's website and spoke at a 2010 WEF event in China. https://t.co/QHb8ShhJgx

@greg_scott84 - Greg

5) Tony served as Minister of Health and Minister of Industry under Harper. He worked with the World Health Organization to fashion the first National Pandemic Plan for future pandemic events. More recently, he was the director for a global health organization called Maitri. https://t.co/NzLb0JwYvP

@greg_scott84 - Greg

6) Maitri offers health care solutions that include providing PPE, testing, and innovative technology to "keep people safe and organizations running." https://t.co/fH0i3t5RAt

@greg_scott84 - Greg

7) Maitri has since changed their name to Bloom Health Partners and still provides Covid-19 testing and health data management services. https://t.co/yd9lSkrfPl

@greg_scott84 - Greg

8) Bloom boasts of providing smarter, secure health data management for larger corporations worldwide, more particularly North America. https://t.co/Sl2WqHffue

@greg_scott84 - Greg

9) In addition to providing PPE and RT-PCR testing, Bloom's data management services include vaccine tracking technology. https://t.co/4RFxeAhWth

@greg_scott84 - Greg

10) Bloom provides testing and data management services for theme parks, manufacturing facilities, major sporting events, schools, and TV and film production companies. Tony is no longer a director at Bloom Health Partners, but still works with the company as an advisor. https://t.co/9k15LMOh7Z

@greg_scott84 - Greg

11) Bloom's major clients include PepsiCo, Netflix, Six Flags, Amazon Studios, Apple TV+, Live Nation, Sony, Viacom CBS, and others. The global workplace safety market size is expected to reach US$19.9 billion by 2025. https://t.co/jZrFdGlh9O

@greg_scott84 - Greg

12) It's concerning that Poilievre appointed someone to be a director of the Conservative Party's main funding body who is a World Economic Forum speaker and an advisor to a corporation that specializes in Covid-19 data management for Fortune 500 companies. What do you think? https://t.co/IelIpsLxpk

PierrePoilievre
Posted - May 3, 2023 at 6:20 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:30 AM

@PierrePoilievre - Pierre Poilievre

BREAKING: Trudeau is in hiding. He's afraid to face questions on why he has done nothing to stop Beijing's agents from targeting Canadians. https://t.co/IVwtm3JQlx

DiamondsQu33n
Posted - May 17, 2023 at 6:50 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:30 AM

@DiamondsQu33n - Qu33nOfDiamonds

Listen to #BrandenLeslie push the Liberal Climate Change BS, pushes GMO's and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Look at what they tried to do to the Netherlands This guy is a SWAMP creature, Greta would approve #VotePPC #MaximeBernier https://t.co/tu7wOxzjio

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Grain Growers of Canada (GGC) has hired a consulting firm, led by Renee Bill Gillett, to develop a roadmap for achieving net zero emissions in the grain sector by 2050. The GGC believes that Canadian farms have the potential to contribute to emission reductions and wants to partner with the government to achieve shared objectives. The project aims to focus on innovation, such as yield increases, plant genetics, and emerging technologies that can help farmers reduce emissions. The advisory council, which is still being finalized, will include farmers, representatives from member organizations, academic institutions, think tanks, and an environmental group to ensure diverse perspectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today on the show, Glenda Lee Allen Bossler talks with the manager of policy and government relations for the grain growers of Canada, Brandon Leslie. The GGC has now hired a consulting firm to work with them on their road to 2050 initiative. Speaker 1: So we initially announced the project, our intention to, create a roadmap to achieve net zero emissions in the grain sector by 2050. One of the biggest pieces of that has been selecting, consultants, to lead the project. And so after, quite a bit of deliberation and Receiving several proposals from firms and individuals, through a competitive process, we were we were pleased to select, Renee Bill Gillett, Actually, we had a team of 4, experienced experts to carry out the project. Renee has vast experience in the space of environmental and and economic Solving and in particular some recent experience and a similar type project for the cement industry. So we're fairly confident to, in his ability to lead the project sand is becoming increasingly evident that we must act, you know, now to mitigate the impacts of climate change. And, we do believe that Canadian farms offer tremendous potential to to play a larger role, make sure that we can work hand in hand with government to achieve our shared objectives of emission reductions. I think farmers expect the government to be reasonable listen to what they say is feasible. So this project is certainly aiming to do just that. And as I said, farmers want to partner with governments in these shared goals. We need to make sure that we do have that maintained focus on innovation, those yield increases, your plant genetics, and other other, new technologies that are emerging that have cause our, farmers to use less emissions. Speaker 0: Now you talked about the advisory council. Who is on that? Speaker 1: Well, I won't give away all the names just yet on that. We're still working on finalizing that. But in general terms, it's going to be made up roughly of about half of Farm farmers themselves are farm representatives through staff of our member organizations from across the country. But we wanted to make sure we looked a little bit outside of of just As farmers, make sure that it isn't, just an echo chamber. So we're we're intending to have a couple of members of, various academic institutions and think tank institutions, as well as an environmental, group to make sure that we're we're well rounded and have a diversity of views.
UncleNestor22
Posted - November 27, 2022 at 10:02 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill C-4, originally C-6, is criticized as a thought crime bill that prioritizes the "trans agenda" while not banning efforts to convert children to LGBT. The bill criminalizes therapy that doesn't conform to Queer Marxist ideology, with dissenting therapists and parents facing penalties. The media largely ignored cases like Robert Hoogland's, who was arrested for protecting his child. Activist judges and the teacher's union are accused of endangering children with anonymity. Politicians like Erin O'Toole and Pierre Poilievre voted in favor of the bill. Critics argue that Bill C-4 does the opposite of protecting marginalized communities.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

1/14 Bill C-4 (originally C-6) is a travesty of justice, and one of the most extreme examples of govt subsidy media disinformation. Dubbed "the conversion therapy ban", this bill was framed as if it saved gay youths from being terrorized by Christians. But that's upside down.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

2/ First of all, the bill definitely does not ban conversion therapy. It criminalizes any therapy that does not conform to Queer Marxist ideology on gender & sexuality. Therapists who dissent from State dogma face jail time & large fines; parents can also lose custody.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

3/ Much like legislation in Red China with regards to official State ideology, Bill C-4 is a THOUGHT CRIME bill. It places the dangerous "trans agenda" above reproach, but efforts by govt agents (such as teachers/doctors) to convert children to LGBT are explicitly not banned.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

4/ In fact, trans brainwashing of children is actively encouraged & pushed primarily through radical teacher's unions, working hand-in-hand with corrupt medical staff & Big Pharma. Thus, the commies advance anti-natalism etc. & Big Pharma gets lucrative customers for life.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

5/ In the original vote, only 7 CPC "opposition" MPs voted against it out of 121, including @TrueDerekSloan. Despite obvious human rights problems, Erin O'Toole, Pierre Poilievre and Co. had no problem with C-6/4. And Con Sen. leader Housakos forced it by unanimous consent.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

6/ One famous victim of this ideology is father Robert Hoogland: https://thepostmillennial.com/rob-hoogland-canada-prisoner-of-conscience "...The warrant was issued by a judge for the arrest of a father after calling his biological female child his "daughter," and referring to her with the pronouns "she" and "her..."

Father jailed after referring to biological female child as his daughter The warrant was issued by a judge for the arrest of a father after calling his biological female child his “daughter,” and referring to her with the pronouns “she” and “her.” He was found to be in contempt of court. thepostmillennial.com

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

7/ Robert's plight was largely ignored by govt subsidy media, only highlighted by alt media and tireless activists such as @BillboardChris :

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Rob Hoogland was just taken to jail. His crime? Trying to protect his little girl from medical harm. I stand with Robert Hoogland.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

7/ The Hoogland case emanates from the kangaroo court "Human Rights Tribunal" of BC. Hoogland used a GoFundMe to raise money for his defense; the judge saw that and fined him the precise amount that he had raised, banned him from speaking to media, doc-tators remain anonymous.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

8/ The Canadian regime jailed Hoogland for contempt of court, since he dared to talk to an indie media site about his case. Meanwhile, the doc-tators and teacher's union commies can pervert & endanger children anonymously, with State protection. Activist judges out of control.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

9/ Here's O'Toole and Poilievre voting YES for the so-called "conversion therapy ban" bill. (Note: At the time of the vote in Oct 2020, the legislation was still called Bill C-6) : https://ourcommons.ca/Members/en/votes/43/2/14?view=province-territory

Vote Detail - 14 - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada Vote Detail - 14 - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada ourcommons.ca

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

10/ Here is the follow up vote in June 2021, where again, Poilievre voted Yes : https://ourcommons.ca/Members/en/votes/43/2/175?view=party

Vote Detail - 175 - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada Vote Detail - 175 - Members of Parliament - House of Commons of Canada ourcommons.ca

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

11/ Contrary to govt-media, no one in the House of Commons is more "woke" then Michelle Rempel, who famously met NDP extremist Oger. The ideological goal is for a parent who opposes the trans agenda to be punished, and ultimately, for the children to become assets of the State.

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

12/ Rebel media chimed in, to their credit: "..The politicians would like you to embrace the false notion that Bill C-4 is about inclusion and protection of marginalized communities, but it is not — in fact, it accomplishes the opposite entirely. ..." https://www.rebelnews.com/coming_to_jesus_moment_or_criminal_offence_bill_c-4_strips_canadians_of_their_freedom_to_choose

Coming to Jesus moment, or criminal offence? Bill C-4 strips Canadians of their freedom to choose Unfortunately, despite the feigned rhetoric of inclusivity and diversity surrounding Bill C-4, stories like Hudson’s might become altogether less common — in fact, they may technically be illegal. rebelnews.com

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

13/ A Christian perspective: https://ca.thegospelcoalition.org/columns/ad-fontes/bill-c-4-history-concerns-and-response/

Bill C-4: History, Concerns, and Response - The Gospel Coalition | Canada On January 7th, 2022 Bill C-4 will become the law of the land in Canada. Christian pastors, parents, counsellors and mentors may all be affected. ca.thegospelcoalition.org

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

14/ A feminist perspective: https://www.feministcurrent.com/2022/01/09/bill-c-4-breaches-medical-ethics-and-should-concern-anyone-opposed-to-conversion-therapy/

Bill C-4 breaches medical ethics and should concern anyone opposed to conversion therapy Canada passed amendments to an anti-conversion therapy bill which will effectively legalize "transing away the gay." feministcurrent.com

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

@TrueNorthCentre - True North

What is the point of having an Official Opposition when they give unanimous consent to a Leftist bill that bans free speech? Watch The @CandiceMalcolm Show: https://tnc.news/2021/12/03/cbcs-being-black-in-canada-series-is-straight-out-of-an-orwell-novel/ #cdnpoli

Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of parliament are seen celebrating and cheering after passing a super liberal progressive bill. Despite concerns about its impact on free speech and normal conversations, they appear ecstatic and united. The official opposition's role is to oppose bills, but this time they chose to support it, possibly due to Aaron O'Toole's demand or a lack of will to fight. The celebratory atmosphere and self-congratulations are not what people expect from their government or conservatives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And here you can see all of the members of parliament standing up, cheering. I look at these people, it looks like they've just solved world peace, or like they've just ended world hunger or something. They're all so excited. They're jumping up and down. They're hugging each other. They're glad handing. We did it. We all came together to pass the super liberal progressive bill that may have a chilling impact on free speech. It may criminalize normal conversations between little kids and their parents, teenagers and their counselors, or if someone wants to go talk to someone in their church about gender or sexuality, It could all be illegal according to Garnet Genesis' previous campaign, and yet for some reason, they're all just so ecstatic that they're on the same team. You can see dancing. There's Michelle Rumple in a red blazer. She's dancing around, you know, jumping up and down. Look look at them. They're still clapping. High. They're giving themselves a 2 minute standing ovation, for all being so progressive and liberal. This is not what you want from your government. This is not what you want from conservatives. This is not what you want from the official opposition. The reason in Canada that we have an official opposition is to oppose bills. There are very few times where you want unanimous consent in the House of Commons. Maybe when we're talking about going to war against an enemy or or maybe when we're talking about a grand national project going together. Those may be the 1 or 2 exceptions. Otherwise, the reason they're called the official opposition. The reason we have an official opposition in our parliamentary system is to oppose bills exactly what the conservatives did for the first two times this bill was presented. But but this time around, maybe because Aaron O'Toole demanded that they all vote this way, maybe because they lost the will to fight, maybe because they just wanted to give up, maybe because they wanted a feel good moment. As you can see, they're they're all jumping around and and and congratulating themselves.
CBC’s “Being Black in Canada” series is straight out of an Orwell novel CBC loves dividing Canadians up by our race and pitting us against one another. There were two glaring examples this week from CBC’s Being Black series. Tune into The Candice Malcolm Show! tnc.news

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

https://t.co/EAPRfiELFM

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

https://t.co/rYihWsx1bs

MarkFriesen08
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 12:05 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:26 AM

@MarkFriesen08 - 🇨🇦MarkFriesen🇨🇦 Buffalo Party of Saskatchewan

Because there is a lot of talk about #Agenda2030. People will be asking questions. Feel free to share this interpretive series on the SDG’s. https://ffcs.info/sdgs-interpreted

Forum for Canadian Sovereignty ffcs.info
bambkb
Posted - October 17, 2023 at 1:08 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:17 AM

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨The Great Reset explained in 5 minutes👇🔥 Humanity needs your help to STOP this dehumanization agenda!!! Please, get educated and help us FIGHT BACK!!! #TheGreatReset #Agenda2030 #UnitedNations #GlobalCoupdetat https://t.co/pPsHK0Lpjs

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of the "Great Reset," which involves replacing small businesses with big tech and big business, and shifting towards a new form of capitalism focused on net zero emissions. This global commitment, supported by organizations like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations, aims to reshape economies and laws using the panic and fear generated by COVID-19. The plan includes replacing shareholders with left-wing bureaucrats and climate change activists, eradicating carbon emissions using political and authoritarian tools, and promoting a "new normal." The speaker emphasizes that this is not a conspiracy theory, but a deliberate effort with potential repercussions for everyone.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A reset, it's a great deception. Replacing mom and dad's small businesses and private enterprises with big tech and big business. Democracy and free enterprise go out the window. Totalitarian government control slides in through the back door. Those behind this scheme are adamant that there can be and never will be a return to normal, That life will never again be what it was prior to COVID. That is why they constantly talk about the new normal. The World Economic Forum meets every January in Davos. You'll have heard of the expression Davos man. It refers to all the zillionaires and pop stars and popes and princes and politicians who meet every year to map out our futures. This year's Davos is very, very different to all the previous ones. The World Economic Forum, along with the United Nations, along with the International Monetary Fund, and along with any number of prominent Globalist organizations and powerful individuals, including Prince Charles, together have jointly promised That the 2021 World Economic Forum will be used to introduce via a vast network of connected big tech corporations, Online activist movements and compliant local and national governments, something they call the great reset. This isn't some are sky after dark Fantasy conspiracy theory. It is a global commitment they have made to use the panic and fear generated by the coronavirus as a means to reshape all our economies and laws and move to a new form of capitalism that focuses on net zero emissions. You might think this is a great thing. You might think this is a terrible thing. If implemented successfully, the great reset will undeniably and deliberately have extreme and possibly dire repercussions for every single one of your constituents. Already, the great reset is being widely advertised on posters and in ads across the UK and Europe. And no doubt, we'll be here before too long. You'll own nothing and you'll be happy is just one of their marketing slope. The plan involves replacing shareholders of big companies with stakeholders who happen to be left wing bureaucrats and climate change zealots, replacing mum and dad small businesses and private enterprises with big tech and big business. Missus Kufeld's share poll portfolio is out. Greta Thunberg's 0 emissions are in. Democracy and free enterprise go out the window. Totalitarian government control slides in through the back door. But remember, it's not only a great reset, it's a great deception. Because in order to get everyday people to surrender many of the rights and freedoms we currently take for granted, the repeatedly Stated aim of these organizations is to deliberately use COVID as an excuse to use all the political and authoritarian Tools, as prince Charles puts it, that are currently being used around the world to eradicate the virus, such as lockdowns, exclusion zones, forced closure of businesses, Heavy fines making protesting illegal and so on. But now, to eradicate carbon emissions. Those behind this scheme are adamant that there can be and never will be a return to normal. That life will never again be what it was prior to COVID. That is why they constantly talk about the new normal. This is this is not me saying this. This is them saying it. The people with the power and the means and the obsessional desire to do it. And they keep telling us again and again precisely what they have in store. Speaker 1: Now is the historical moments of time, not only to fight severe virus but to shapes the system. We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path. It is an opportunity we we have never had before and may never have a game. So we must use all the levers we have at our disposal, Knowing that each and every one of us has a vital role to play. Speaker 2: The great reset is a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake up call. It is imperative that we reimagine, rebuild, redesign, reinvigorate, and rebalance our worlds. Rebalancing investments, harnessing science and technology, and advancing the transition to net zero emissions, All elements of the great reset are fundamental to building the future we need. Speaker 0: And if it's still not clear, the book written by World Economic Forum boss, Klaus Schaub himself setting out precisely how the most powerful forces in the world are lining up to use the COVID 19 crisis as a pretext for introducing a new climate change focused one world economy that will strip away property rights and basic democratic rights. They are not hiding this stuff. They are shouting it from the rooftops. The World Economic Forum boasts on its website that the only acceptable response to the COVID crisis is to pursue a great reset of our economies, our politics, and our societies.
greg_scott84
Posted - July 18, 2023 at 3:01 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:14 AM

@greg_scott84 - Greg

24) We have a duty and a responsibility as Canadians to DEMAND that Poilievre provide clear answers on these issues. He must publicly and unequivocally denounce the UN's Sustainable Development Agenda and officially oppose Agenda 2030 in the Conservative Party's federal platform. https://t.co/Iyu9qRqKkL

MaximeBernier
Posted - October 7, 2023 at 5:01 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:14 AM

@MaximeBernier - Maxime Bernier

Some people have been asking my position on the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. It’s simple. I don't want a single penny of Canadian taxpayers money to go to support EITHER SIDE of another foreign war that has nothing to do with us!

therobprimo1
Posted - July 21, 2023 at 10:42 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:12 AM

@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️

EXPOSED https://t.co/QXvh7HPmuf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker admits to not having read the UN Sustainable Development Agenda (SDG) but agrees to look into it. Speaker 1 confronts Pierre Polivet about his previous support for the federal sustainable development act. Speaker 0 dismisses the importance of the SDG and criticizes Bernie for his views on free trade and drug legalization. Speaker 0 also mentions working with Maxie and questions Polivet's stance on the Paris Climate Accord. Polivet emphasizes reducing emissions at a lower cost and accuses Maxine Bernier of lying about his affiliations. The conversation ends with a mention of posting the discussion on Twitter.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. You denounced the UN Sustainable Development Agenda, the SDG. I haven't read it. I don't know what it is. You haven't read it? No. I haven't. That's interesting. Do you wanna do a shot? Sure. Alright. Very good. Thank you. Alright. I'll I'll have to look at it. Yes. You want to I don't I have a similar rule. If I haven't read it, I don't comment on it. You need to read it. It's extremely important. Thank you for the good good recommendation. Absolutely. I'll have a look at it. Sure. I'm remediation. Absolutely. I'll have a look at it. Speaker 1: No. I didn't have a copy, Pierre. And you know why? Because you told us 1 year ago you were gonna have a look at it, and you still haven't. But you know what I do have a copy of? I've got a copy of the official report from the House of Commons where you acknowledge the federal sustainable development act 11 years ago. It's It's at this point I let Pierre Polivet know that I'm well aware he's voted in favor of the sustainable development goals before in the House of Commons, and he knows closed that, and that's why he's trying to distract me and bring us to a different topic now. Bill c 474, Federal Sustainable Development Act. All in favor, mister Pierre Polyviers, conservative. Speaker 0: There's only one there's only 2 teams. I have an orange from Canada. That's what I wanna hear. I don't wanna work for the WEF like Bernie. Right? We don't need someone like Bernie wants a free trade deal with China, a voice in favor of legalizing our drugs. We don't need, the guy who's just working day and night to keep her on power, which is what you I have a talk with Maxie. We're But you I am your favorite native You have voted on it. I voted on it. No. I hear you. If I could. Yes. I want you to know if I I voted if I voted if I always I haven't read. Will you just talk to Will you dispose of the, the Paris Climate Accord? That's the last question. When you're prime minister, will you denounce the Speaker 2: the Paris Climate Accord, or don't we're gonna we're gonna Speaker 0: hit the hit the I haven't heard it. I'm gonna we're gonna hit this hit this from the emissions reduction targets. Is it fair to say no, you won't then? We're we're gonna we're gonna reduce the emissions, and we're going to it delivered at a lower cost at the same time. That's my agenda. That's my policy. And, and and no more I have it. Maxine Bernier needs to explain why he was at the World Economic Forum. Leave that on there. Don't edit that out. I won't edit. I know. We don't want Bernier to try and lie about who he is and what he chance That will be on there. That will be on Twitter.
greg_scott84
Posted - January 24, 2024 at 10:12 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 6:41 AM

@greg_scott84 - Greg

This is who Pierre Poilievre appointed to run Canada's Treasury Board once the CPC is elected. https://t.co/ZjxlCZwCgL

RyanPatrick1991
Posted - February 5, 2024 at 4:22 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 6:39 AM

@RyanPatrick1991 - RyanFJBLGB🇺🇸🦅

Conspiracy of the day. Did Fruit of the Loom ever have a cornucopia? https://t.co/laMHKypbHB

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a conspiracy theory called the Mandela Effect, which suggests that powerful entities are manipulating our memories and erasing history. An example given is the Fruit of the Loom logo, which some people remember having a cornucopia, but the company denies ever having it. A woman obsessed with this theory found an old t-shirt with the logo featuring a cornucopia and even discovered an old trademark illustration with the cornucopia. The question raised is why these entities would gaslight us and if this is a global experiment to test the ease of erasing history.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You heard the conspiracy theory around the Mandela Effect? Speaker 1: Several. What do you mean? About erasing history? Speaker 0: Yes. Basically, just that the Mandela effect is, like, big parties, like government and all that stuff, just gas lining us into thinking that One thing is true and not true, and so people have these real memories. And so this woman gave the example of the Fruit of the Loom logo. She said the Fruit of the Loom logo used to have a cornucopia in it, so, you know, like the basket with all the fruits spilling out. And Fruit of the Loom Speaker 1: It did, didn't it? Here's the thing. Speaker 0: Fruit of the Loom was like, we've never ever had that, and they went so far as to create an illustration of their logo All throughout the years, none of them showing the cornucopia. Speaker 1: That's impossible. Speaker 0: This chick went so crazy about it. Like, she was talking to her therapist, and her therapist is like, Chill out about Fruit of the Loom. Yeah. Like, you're obviously so manic. And then she was like, I'm not kidding. I've it has a cornucopia in it and I'm I'm gonna die on this hill. She went through her whole closet in, like, friends' closets and stuff, and she finally found a t shirt that had the Fruit of the Loom logo with a cornucopia. Speaker 1: No way. And she went as far as to go look at the old, like, trademarks and stuff Yeah. Like US government trademarks Yeah. And found an illustration of At the cornucopia. Dude, what is up with that? Why are they gaslighting us? The theory is it's a giant experiment, worldwide experiment to see how Easy it is to erase history.
KEriksenV2
Posted - February 6, 2024 at 6:16 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 6:33 AM

@KEriksenV2 - Kris Eriksen 🇨🇦

Never forget that all 338 Members of Parliament stood and applauded an actual Nazi. https://t.co/zqWTsvTu5u

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky's speech garnered multiple standing ovations, including one for a 98-year-old Ukrainian Canadian veteran who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians in World War II.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Zelensky's speech received at least a dozen standing ovations. There was also one for this man, a 98 year old Ukrainian Canadian who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians during the 2nd World War.
print3_d
Posted - November 10, 2023 at 5:16 PM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: Pierre Poilievre and the CPC party's plans align suspiciously with the UN's Agenda 21. Watch @sophiadahl1's video and decide for yourself. Consider supporting the PPC instead of the CPC. Post 2: @reSeeIt save thread.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

Don't believe Pierre Poilievre or the CPC party in 🇨🇦 are UN controlled? Watch @sophiadahl1 's video first, then watch the Pierre clip.. Odd how his plans are identical to the UN's. 🧐 https://x.com/sophiadahl1/status/1722787777849262439?s=20… Wake up people. CPC isn't the solution. PPC is.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To maximize the potential of transit stations, we should build high-density apartments around them. Currently, many stations lack housing despite available land and the large amount of money invested in their construction. To address this, I propose using federal funding for transit as leverage. City mayors seeking federal money would be required to approve high-density apartments near their stations. This would benefit seniors and students by providing convenient access to public transportation, eliminating the need for a car. Calgary City Hall has already approved a similar plan, with housing connected to a station via a walkover bridge.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Moral of the story. We need to approve high density apartments around every future transit station, something we don't do now. There are many stations across the country that took 1,000,000 of dollars to build, but there's very little housing around them even though there's available land. And that means that we're not getting the maximum potential out of the massive expense that we put into those transit stations. The federal government funds transit. My common sense plan is to use that funding as leverage. I'm gonna say to the big city mayors, If you want federal money for your transit station, you have to approve high density apartments all around them so that seniors and students don't even need to afford a car. The Calgary, city hall approved this one over here as well. More housing over here. Folks are able to come down the elevator, get on to this little walkover and go over to the station in order to get on the train and head wherever they are going.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

1/2 ⛔️Under the United Nations' plan for total global control known as Agenda 21(which later evolved into Agenda 2030),all humans who once lived on farms and in rural areas, are to be forcibly relocated into densely populated"smart" cities,referred to as "human settlements"‼️🙏👇 https://t.co/u5UWhRiJeC

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat 1 plan at the Vancouver Convention, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities, now called human settlements. The idea behind this plan was to concentrate populations in specific areas to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. As a result, people would stay at home more, potentially even working from home, and rely less on cars and energy. The UN's focus on sustainable development led to the phasing out of single-family homes, which they considered suburban sprawl. Instead, people would live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. This concept of "smart growth" or "new urbanism" advocates for using only the necessary amount of space. The overall goal is to make private transportation and owning homes less desirable, promoting the idea of being a responsible global citizen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Recall we mentioned the United Nations Habitat 1 plan that came down at the Vancouver Convention in 1976. Under this plan, all humans that once lived on farms and in rural areas, so called wild lands, will be relocated to cities now referred to as human settlements. Speaker 1: And, the idea is that if you concentrate populations Into specific areas or zones, less energy usage, less water usage, and less transportation. So people will, have less reason To leave home, they'll, stay in their homes. They may even work out of their homes. And, so they're not gonna be using, their cars. They're gonna be using energy, and, they're not gonna be using water. Speaker 0: Since, as we saw earlier, the UN is not big on property rights, It should come as no surprise that the first private property to be phased out will be single family homes, what socialist at UN Headquarters consider suburban sprawl. Instead, We The People will live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. Our super tall dwelling units will all be built to UN specified building codes authorized by Ickley, COGS, the ADA and a myriad of NGOs and other friends of sustainable development. While the animals run wild in continental Corridors, We, the humans, will live in transit villages and smart cities. Speaker 1: Smart growth or Our new urbanism, is that ideology that says that you shouldn't have more space than you actually need. So if you're a couple of people living in a 3 bedroom house, well, you don't need that extra space. So why do you have it? Speaker 2: It there's a a clear concerted effort to make it really just about as miserable as possible To exist and use your own private transportation, own your own home, all impetus and incentive, In financial and otherwise, is to convince people that it is unsustainable, to live in your own home, Have air conditioning. It is their duty as a human being, as a global citizen, you see. You

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

therobprimo1
Posted - November 7, 2023 at 2:47 PM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:48 PM

@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️

Today the @CBCNews has reported that @PierrePoilievre won’t say if he will commit to Canada achieving the Paris Climate Accord. The state broadcaster obviously is incapable of doing any research. I got the answer quite some time ago because you just service the machine. https://t.co/mo2WuvwFFE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Conservative leader Pierre Polivier refuses to confirm if Canada will commit to its emission targets under the Paris agreement. When asked if he will denounce the accord, Polivier avoids a direct answer. Instead, he states that his agenda and policy focus on reducing emissions and delivering at a lower cost.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: NBC News reports conservative leader Pierre Polivier won't say if he will commit Canada to achieving its promised emission targets under the Paris agreement on climate change. Don't worry, CBC. We know as our state broadcaster, you are completely incapable of doing any journalistic at work. So I've done that work for you. When you're prime minister, will you denounce the the Paris Climate Accord or no? Speaker 1: We're gonna we're gonna hit the hit the the emissions reduction targets. Speaker 0: Is it fair to say no, Speaker 1: you won't then? We're we're gonna we're gonna reduce the emissions, And we're going to deliver at a lower cost at the same time. That's my agenda. That's my policy.
print3_d
Posted - June 18, 2023 at 12:22 AM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pierre Poilievre has been accused of lying about his knowledge of the SDGs. Despite voting in favor of bills related to the SDGs and being a member of the SDG committee, he claimed to know nothing about them. A referenced article provides proof of his contradictory statements.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

🧵1/2 Pierre Poilievre lied about reading the SDG's. PP voted yea on Bill C-474, Bill C-57, and the Paris accord all SDG's. He's also a member of ENVI which is 🇨🇦's SDG committee. PPC will remove us from the SDG's Why would PP claim to know nothing about the SDG's? ⬇️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 Nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now, all over the world. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, All water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all Food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed 2 by a 179 Nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the 21st century, and so many of us around the world think that, while sustainable And it just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and, and creating energy and food resources for everyone, and the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, Concentrated city centers and clearing them out of the rural areas. All systems have to be Brought into harmony in order to control them all. Because when systems don't meet, when they're when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, They can't be controlled centrally. And the goal of Agenda 21 is 1 World Government and total control from a central unit. Every nation that signed on to Agenda 21 has its, its local Agenda 21 plan. People in the United States are completely unaware of this. If I go out and talk about this, the United States press will attacks me, and calls me, which is, it's totally ridiculous. It is a, But it's not a theory, it's fact. The 3 pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are Economy, Ecology, and Equity, the 3 E's. And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea Social equity. It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and, no one's, property is going to be used as a Ground because they are at a poverty level. But really what social equity is about, it's about impoverishing Huge portions of the population and bringing down, developed the developed nations. Everything that we're looking at now is Destined to collapse our economies. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world, and what major corporations want in this development is to be able to, to have movement full movement of Of workers without borders or boundaries to be able to move their goods through without regulations, and to reduce wages. And so this is the goal, so this is what you find with social equity. And of course, economy and, ecology is about are the 3 circles: economy, ecology, and social equity, and where they meet in the center is balance, but really that balance It's a communitarian balance. So it's not balance of well-being of the people. What it is is it's a balance or corporation so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area in tightly packed dense areas so that they can be surveilled and managed. And this is what that Balance looks like as far as the development of totalitarian state is. The mainstream media is owned by 5 major corporations, and you're not Going to get this information from the mainstream press. So you need to be your own press. You need to educate yourself. You need to get out there and Educate your neighbors, your community, your real community. You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre kindergarten to postgraduate school. All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others. This is true community To work for personal freedom. And always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals In those groups, and we answer only to ourselves. And this is essential. It's essential as as as free human beings. This is what we are. We are free and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have To become aware that there is a fight, and then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well, and work together.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

🧵2/2 Proof PP lies 1 - https://rumble.com/v2uv2rg-pierre-poilievre-meets-mark-friesen-lies-about-reading-the-un-sdg.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5 PP lies 2 - ENVI- https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/ENVI/Members?includeAssociates=True#AssociateMembers Article proving pierre lied https://boereport.com/2020/11/20/economic-triage-for-canada-in-the-face-of-green-agendas-and-net-zero/

Pierre Poilievre meets Mark Friesen Lies about reading the UN SDG Clip of Pierre Poilievre flat out lieing when he meets Mark Freisen as he claims to know nothing about the SDG (sustainable development goals) even though pierre was the Minister of Employment and Soc rumble.com
ENVI - Members - House of Commons of Canada A list of current and past members of the Environment and Sustainable Development. Link to each Member's individual profile or find information about associate members of the committee. ourcommons.ca
Economic triage for Canada in the face of green agendas and net-zero | BOE Report As the Canadian federal government proposed net-zero legislation this week in the House of Commons, issues around net-zero and the green agenda could mean big problems for consumers and significant disconnects for the Canadian economy. This week, in a virtual panel discussion, MP Pierre Poilievre, Jack Mintz, Dan McTeague, and Catherine Swift discussed the UN boereport.com

@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️

Me: Does the Conservative Party under your leadership support the “United Nations Sustainable Development Goals” Pierre: I don’t know what those are but I don’t support anything imposed on us by any global organization. Me: I asked why he voted in favor in 2017 then? Pierre: “I’m not sure I don’t know what they are”

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

davidicke
Posted - February 4, 2024 at 9:03 PM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was asked to come on the show a few weeks ago, but I declined due to my busy schedule. I still want to discuss the impact of Musk on the alternative media and the lack of critical questioning towards him. It's important to have these debates. My issue is not with people supporting Musk, but rather the lack of scrutiny towards his views and actions.

@davidicke - David Icke

Alex, mate, I don’t understand this post. I was asked to come on the show a couple of weeks or so ago and this was my reply to producer Daria on January 18th: Daria ... sorry for the delay, mate. I am writing and researching a book at the moment and it's full-on, head-down, seven-days, all-day, coming up for air occasionally. Can you ask me in early February and we'll see how I am fixed then? I should be on the other side of the deep stuff by that time. Hope you are well, all the best, David That still stands. Not only do I want to discuss the Musk impact on the alternative media, it is important that these things are debated. My problem is not with people using ‘X’ while they can, of course not. It the hero worship of Musk and the way this has stopped his Cult-serving views and activities being questioned on the scale that they would have been before.

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

David I have invited you on at least 5 times in the last month to talk about Musk. I am saying what ever I want on X and that is a good thing. I think of you as a friend so feel free to keep calling me out for being happy with Elons actions but at lest come on the show. If CNN said come on next week and say what ever you want I would. You are on X as well and reaching a lot of people.

Europa_Active
Posted - January 27, 2024 at 12:46 PM
Saved - January 29, 2024 at 10:14 AM

@Europa_Active - Europa The Last Battle Activism

Share Everywhere. Click the link in our profile bio to watch the Documentary. Our main Account was suspended yesterday without a reason given. The "Elites" are so afraid of this documentary they are willing to censor it to the oblivion. https://t.co/BGSHWK81Gs

Grimezsz
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 2:50 AM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 7:02 AM

@Grimezsz - 𝖦𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 ⏳

A few years ago we released a prophesy on this ancient tablet (to the left). Since most of the bad omens have come true we've cancelled this stone and are releasing a new prophesy (right). Huge apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused. https://t.co/X5KjBjpm3y

va_shiva
Posted - October 31, 2023 at 7:24 AM
Saved - November 13, 2023 at 4:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Shiva, a prominent public figure, claims to be the most censored leader on social media. His 2020 lawsuit exposed a government-backed censorship portal on platforms like Twitter and Facebook. Despite being reinstated on Twitter, he hoped Elon Musk would dismantle the portal, but it remains. Dr. Shiva accuses Elon Musk of shadowbanning him for exposing the portal. He believes that our data is being mined by government and used for predictive analytics. Dr. Shiva emphasizes the need to disconnect from the online world for a brighter future.

@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email

I am perhaps the MOST censored public figure and leader on Social Media. Why? My historic 2020 lawsuit http://winbackfreedom.com first exposed GOVT’s Backdoor Censorship Portal into Twitter, fb, etc In 12/22 I was put back on Twitter & hoped @ElonMusk would dismantle this Portal. He has NOT! In fact #Eeelon, who is GOVT frontman (https://vashiva.com/elon-musk-equals-censorship-surveillance-a-false-god-leading-you-to-slavery-how-we-win-back-freedom/) proceeded to massively shadowban me for my relentless exposure of his keeping this portal open. Why? Because neither I nor the movement for http://TruthFreedomHealth.com is beholden to or a slave to any members of the SWARM. Where #Eeelon begins and GOVT ends nobody knows. All of our data is being mined by #Eelon’s pals in GOVT to perform predictive analytics to build profiles on us and our followers to manipulate outcomes. The FUTURE is OFFLINE! Be the Light, -Dr.SHIVA http://Shiva4President.com

Dr.SHIVA's Historic First Amendment Lawsuit to Win Back Freedom: First Case in U.S. To Show Government MADE Twitter Silence Political Speech A historic landmark case - the first case in the United States - to show that government makes Twitter silence Political Speech. vashiva.com
Elon Musk = Censorship + Surveillance: A False God Leading You To Slavery. How We Win Back Freedom. Elon Musk = Censorship + Surveillance: A false god for "free speech" leading you to slavery in an ever-expanding CENSORSHIP & SURVEILLANCE STATE across land vashiva.com
Join Dr.SHIVA™ Truth Freedom Health® Contribute Get Educated,Or Be Enslaved The Man Who Invented Email now delivers the Truth Freedom Health® System to make you STREET SMART so you may see things as they truly are – beyond “Left” vs. “Right” & “Pro” vs. “Anti” – and improve every aspect of your life: your body, your relationships, your business, and […] truthfreedomhealth.com
Dr.SHIVA For President 2024 | Be the Light! Massachusetts ignited the American Revolution. Let's BE THE LIGHT & FIGHT for the American Dream to Inspire, Educate and Innovate! shiva4president.com
va_shiva
Posted - June 9, 2023 at 10:18 PM
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 6:10 PM

@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email

The Elites aren’t any one person or organization, but a SWARM as this short video explains. They brainwash YOU to look to THEM for your salvation only to deliver death & disease. My run for President empowers you to SHATTER THE SWARM http://Shiva4President.com Full video below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Shiva Ijare discusses how a small group of elites control the majority of the population. He explains that these elites use swarm intelligence to manipulate people and achieve their goals of power, profit, and control. The elites are interconnected and include individuals from academia, government, NGOs, big corporations, media, and social media influencers. They manipulate the masses through policies, propaganda, and false heroes. Dr. Shiva emphasizes the importance of understanding systems science and encourages people to join his campaign for truth, freedom, and health. He urges individuals to become aware, unite, and take control of their own lives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, everyone. It's Doctor. Shiva Ijare. How a very small set of people control 8,000,000,000 people. This is what I call the elite. Let's say there's about 10,000 of them. How is it these people are able to manipulate the 8,000,000,000 people here? If you talk to a lot of naive people, they think, Oh, it's The Rothschilds over here. Or it's the aliens. They don't understand. It's not any 1 individual. It's not any 1 organization. There's something called swarm intelligence. If you watch all those birds flying together. Not any one of them is in control. They move together as a unit. They're closely knit. They're quote unquote Telepathic. But they move with a singular goal. The goal of the elites here is power, profit, and control. This is the goal. So if we look at it from a control What are the inputs they're sending into this system to achieve their goals? And what is the output that they seek? So if you're an elite over here and you're looking At those 8,000,000,000 people, how do you know you're achieving your goal? Are people getting fat, meaning unhealthy? Are people getting dumb, which means ignorant? Are people happy? Which means are they being entertained? Are people divided? Are they isolated, disconnected? They don't want people here connecting with each other or people feeling helpless. Are people looking to the elites to save them? And they like that. They like when people here are looking to them, the The enemy here for their saviors, they really love that. They want people to be disorganized, and they definitely want people to be helpless. This is what they want. If you do not want to unite among people here and find who your own leaders are from below, they are quite happy. They're achieving their goal: power, profit, and control. Now how do they do this? You're going to realize it's not any 1 group. It's an interconnected, tightly knit group. They're all closely interconnected. In fact, they all go to the same restaurants. They have all their kids going to the same equestrian shows. They all shop at the same place. They all go to the same parties. You're not part of that. So who are these people, and what are the institutions of power that they have? Well, first of all, they have academia, Harvard, Oxford, Yale, MIT, IIT in India the top 100 university presidents. These people are on boards of companies. But it's about a 100 people who run the major universities in the world. NGOs, or nonprofits. These are people running these huge nonprofit organizations, like the Clinton Global Initiative, WEF, World Economic Forum, Center For Foreign Relations. And there's many other institutions like these, but it's the CEOs of these institutions. And these guys know each other. They definitely work together. The next thing you have is you have government, US senators, prime ministers of countries, advisers to government, think tanks. The Belfer School at Harvard, the Stanford Internet Observatory, They created the censorship infrastructure. This includes CIA, right, intelligence organizations. And again, all these people know each other. They're interconnected. They're a swarm. They're tightly knit. They're not divided like these people over here. They're not disconnected. They're highly interconnected. So these people are focused on power. But then you also have a whole another people, the CEOs of the Global 2,000 companies, other big organizations like big pharma companies, Pfizer, big agriculture companies like Syngenta. Big investment companies. JPMorgan. You put Deutsche Bank here. You put Epstein down here. Okay? He was involved in all this. We also have the Fed, The central banks, all these people party together. When I say party together, I mean literally they party together, guys. Absolute close knit friends. And in fact, the CEO of a Global 2,000 company will easily move to one of the investment companies down here. If you look at Target big companies like Anheuser, Busch, and Exxon. You'll find that at one point they were in one of these investment companies, and these investment companies sit on the board of these companies and they shuffle back and forth. So this is all about making money. Right? These people are about making the dollar. These people are all about power. This is profit. And then fundamentally, you have control. Hollywood over here. This includes celebrities. You have their agents, Hollywood agents, like Ari Emmanuel, as I've talked about, who's a guy who controls most of Hollywood controls worldwide wrestling federation, the MMA, etcetera. The media companies. This includes Disney, Viacom. This includes now Facebook, Twitter. YouTube. These are large media companies. Google, you can put in there also. You also have big news stations: CNN, Fox. And combined with this, now we have another group: Social media influencers. This is like Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, these characters who have come in, but they do not exist without support from these guys. If you notice, overnight, a bunch of social media influencers have come out of nowhere. And these people are created by these people. So when you look at this, the academics, the NGOs, the government, the think tanks, the investment companies, the Fed, the Big Pharma, the CEOs, the Hollywood celebrities, media, social media Influencers and the news companies. And you can even take the top 10 of each one of these. They all know each other, everyone. And in order to manipulate these people. They need front men to manipulate these people with policies, because what comes out are policies. These are the inputs they put into the system, propaganda. They feed these people purposely, people who they tell them are gonna save them, like the Elon Musks or Trump or the Kennedys. Now who are the people part of the swarm that does that? They have the Obvious establishment. And these people are like the Clintons or the McConnells or the Obamas or the Bushes or the Queen of England. Typically, people say, oh, yeah. Those guys are part of the establishment. But one of the things we teach at Truth For Them Health, the most insidious people are what I call the not so obvious establishment. These are the people that are created to make sure that the 8,000,000,000 people look to the elites to save them. Trump. He's got a golden toilet. Mar a Lago. Kennedy's. Completely bogus family. You can look at historically people like Gandhi or people like MLK. These people all came and were endorsed by the swarm. These people do not exist. They live in Malibu. They live in the places of the elite. And these people are the ones that are used to send the inputs Of this controller in system science, these are the controllers. These are the people controlling the inputs that go in. And remember, their goal is to make sure people are in the state of Division, disconnection, helplessness, particularly. They're observing all this. They have their sensors. And one of the features that they notice is that as long as people are in dysfunction and diseased mentally, physically, emotionally, they're happy. Well, what are those diseases these days? We see obesity. We see endocrine disruption, men with low testosterone, and people questioning their sexuality. We also see people with cancer. Sir. The world's population's life expectancy is going down. The United States is going this way, and this is from 1980 to 2020. They like this. This is life expectancy. In fact, when they see dysfunction, you know what they do? They put another input in, which is normalize the dysfunction. Eat Sugar is in high fructose food. Well, over here, people have been literally getting fat. It's led to obesity. Or they've been putting in foods that are affecting people's gut microbiome. This what I call from policy to biology. People are getting worse and worse. They're actually making more money because the obesity now creates obesity drugs. The endocrine disruptors let's talk about this. This will really explain what's going on with Bud Light. About 20 years ago, there was research done at the universities that clearly showed the use of restricted Shrifted use pesticides like atrazine and other chemicals in the atmosphere actually cause endocrine disruption, which could reduce male testosterone, which could also affect mammals where the sex organs can change. And this was done by the work of Tyrone Hayes. So if you're You're over here at a university and you find out one of your researchers discovered that and you are playing golf with people over here at Syngenta, Syngenta is the one who produced atrazine, team. They're gonna say, Hey, man. We don't want this research coming out because you have to understand something. The investment community here is investing in All of these companies. So if you're one of these large investment companies, you're moving 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. $600,000,000,000,000, by the way, move through the economy every day. You, as one of the elite managers of money. You're moving all this money. You know all of these people. You know the CEO of Target. You know the CEO of Anheuser Busch. You know the CEO of Pfizer and syngenta. And imagine that you see, Wow, the stuff that we've been creating is causing sexual disruption changes. You're seeing a phenomenon where more and more people are questioning their sexuality. And what you want to do is you want to make sure that the general public doesn't understand Stand this because if they did, they would awaken to something that's going on from the decisions you made. So you call up your friend, Bud Light. He goes, Hey, look. Let's run a campaign. Let's normalize Trans. Let's exploit a willing person to be exploited like this Dylan Mulaney. Let's put them on as a poster boy for Bud Light, and let's Push them out there because we want the attention to normalize the dysfunction, because the goal is to make sure they don't lose their trillions over its agenda. They're willing to take a $1,000,000,000 hit over here, but they want to save their trillions in big pharma and big ass because they're all part of the same family. They all do favors for each other. Tether. And then again, you would go do it at Target. You try to normalize it because you don't want people over here to understand the bigger picture. But you are interconnected. You could strike deals left and right. Let's do a marketing campaign in here. Let's Getting campaign in here. Let's normalize. Same thing if you can look at what's going on in obesity. All these pharma companies are making big money from obesity drugs, but there's movies on Netflix and Amazon promoting Fat people as a norm. What's happening over here, you have people who are pro fat and people who are anti fat people. You have people who are pro woke and anti woke. And they don't care. So you have a bunch of these idiots writing books against woke companies and anti woke companies. You have people creating apps. Only shop at anti woke companies. Don't go to woke companies. But you guys understand that these guys don't give a damn? They're making money anyway. The investment bankers are gonna make money from woke companies and anti woke companies. But what's occurring here is people are being divided. These guys are happy because they're inputting policies and propaganda. People here being divided, and that is the goal: to achieve power of profit control. So as long as these people work together as a swarm to control the policies and the propaganda. And they provide false heroes, and they're using the Trumps, the Kennedys, and Yachnis, all of them who talk a big game. Their goal is to make sure that you never understand this, that you keep thinking, Oh, Kennedy's gonna solve the problem. Trump is gonna solve the problem. They don't want you to be leaders in your own communities. They want you to outsource your future to people like Trump or Kennedy. Because they're part of the swarm. And you keep getting more hung out y, more ignorant, more entertained. But most importantly, you are divided. People here don't organize themselves to smash these people up. And this is the history of human oppression. They have it down to a system, a goal. They have a controller. They have Specific inputs, they manipulate billions of people to achieve this state. They produce dysfunction. They don't give a damn if you die. The life expectancy in the United Your children are going to die sooner than you, and they've achieved their goal. They don't give a damn. Do you understand? These people are eating organic foods. They get the best restaurants. They get the best insurance. They get the best healthcare. And this is what they wanna achieve. And that's how they're controlling people. The other way they're controlling you is they want you to keep looking to the elites It's like Trump and Kennedy and all these people to save you. They want you to look to the swarm. They do not want you to ever support a Malcolm X or Doctor. Shiva or you. They don't want you to become leaders. And this is a goal. As long as you're divided, as long as you're looking over here, you're going to achieve their goal of power, profit, and control. So what's the way out? How do we win? The first way we win, everyone's got to be aware of the science of systems. Without this understanding, There are goals. There are controllers. There are systems. There are intelligence and there are dump systems. You are never going to break out of this because you will think everything is, Oh my God, we gotta talk about aliens The UFOs and flat earth, they're this. All those may be interesting topics, but they don't come down to the fundamentals of understanding this. And the only way out of this is people here have got to understand the principles of systems science. And the good news is you can learn this at Truth Freedom Health. So first of all, learn these principles at Truth, Freedom, Health. That's the only place. This is my gift to people. We've made it accessible to all your children. Any person who goes through the course, you can give it to your Children, anyone can learn this. But the goal is go to truth from health, and you will understand the science of systems. So we've created that weapon. And with this weapon, this This is a hammer here. We have a way to smash this swarm. But without the understanding of this, without you understanding this, system science, Without you understanding that knowledge of systems, you will never break out of this. Please volunteer. Go to shivaforpresident.com. Volunteer. And by the way, when you donate, I don't like to take people's money for nothing. I give you books and courses and access It's the entire community of truth, freedom, and health.com. So please take advantage of that if you wanna donate. But if you don't wanna donate, volunteer. We're gonna be getting on the ballot in all the states, So we need people on the ground. So go to shiva4 president, numeral4president.com, and volunteer, volunteer, volunteer. Our campaign is about mobilizing you. We have a whole program that we want to train you to be a leader, so we get connected. We're no longer helpless. We stop looking to these fools like Kennedy and Trump and all these other people Well, because where have they gotten us? They're part of the system to increase power, profit, and control. This is why a small set of people, the elites, They keep getting richer and richer off the backs of people. This is why these people are able to control you because they make you disconnected and divided in a very, very systems way. This is the science of systems that they're using. There's about 10,000 people that learn this science. This is not accidental, everyone. What I'm here to tell you is once you understand Stand the engineering physics here. We can't smash these people and make a society where people are decentralized but Connected. We're no longer divided, but we're united with the interests that we have to face their propaganda and destroy them and to no longer follow false heroes. That's what this is about. Because the way we're going now is I've talked about those in power want to kill you. It's not a hyperbole. They want to kill you. The movement for truth, freedom, health and our campaign for Shiva The president is about making sure you live long and prosper. And the only way to do it is you have to become aware of this, recognizing that there's a systems process. Fortunately, truthfreedomhealth.com exists. I wish I didn't have to go do this. In fact, our parents should have done this for us. But anyway, Truth Freedom Health exists. Our A campaign exists. So go to shivaforpresident.com. Become a volunteer. Become a warrior scholar truth, freedom, and health dot com. Every Thursdays At 11 am and at 8 pm, I do a open house, and we have our 8 pm town halls for our campaign. Please join them. You can RSVP at vahgiva.com slash orientation. The other important you can do where we start taking control of our lives, that you start supporting one of us, I'm one of you, leaders, Bottoms up. I didn't grow up in a Kennedy compound. I didn't grow up with golden plated toilet seats. I grew up like you guys. And as a part of that, make sure that you share this video. Hit the share button. Make sure you retweet it. Make sure you click the notify. Make sure you put comments on it. Because you know that I've been exposing their false heroes, Elon Musk and the Kennedys and all their not so obvious establishment people. So their retribution is to shadow damn me. My tweets used to get 500 Thousand views per day. Today, I'm lucky if I get 5,000 views per day. And then they put keywords if something starts going viral to stop that. So the way you can help is Sign up as a volunteer so we get on the ground. The future is offline. I need you to go share these videos. Get it out there and become a truth freedom health warrior. That's the way you guys and help contribute. Anyway, there you go. So anyway, I hope this is valuable. Be the light. Shiva for president.com.truthfreedomhealth.com. Thank you, everyone. Be well. Be the light. Have a good night, have a good morning, good afternoon, wherever you are.
Dr.SHIVA For President 2024 | Be the Light! Massachusetts ignited the American Revolution. Let's BE THE LIGHT & FIGHT for the American Dream to Inspire, Educate and Innovate! shiva4president.com
print3_d
Posted - May 22, 2024 at 5:20 PM
Saved - May 22, 2024 at 5:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The official donation wallets for the Freedom Convoy 2022 have been shared. On-chain analysis shows that less than $400 in BTC was donated and the wallet is now empty. There is a fundraising goal of 100 BCH for the convoy. A backup of the donation address has been provided to prevent deletion.

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

The official Freedom Convoy 2022 donation wallets. If anyone wants to look into the on chain analysis. #freedomconvoy2022 #truckerconvoy2022 #peoplesconvoy2022 I can see that less than 400$ in BTC was donated and wallet is now empty. @dave8988

@maplesyrupsuckr - Corbin

Almost there! Only 10 $BCH to go to 100 BCH goal. Nice work @metapills! 👏 Unstoppable fundraising for #FreedomConvoy2022 with bitcoin cash 🚚🇨🇦🚛🇨🇦🚚🇨🇦🚛🇨🇦 Donate via flipstarter to https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Or see direct donation addresses below

Freedom Convoy - Cheaper And Develops Faster Bitcoin was introduced in the year 2009 and it was well-received in the market. However, there are some issues with Bitcoins. freedomconvoy.cash

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

Link to the original reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/skyfuy/flipstarter_bitcoin_cash_for_the_freedom_convoy/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Backup of the address in case someone in government tries to delete https://web.archive.org/web/20221207203958/https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/skyfuy/flipstarter_bitcoin_cash_for_the_freedom_convoy/

From the btc community on Reddit 28 votes, 175 comments. Flipstarter: https://freedomconvoy.cash/ Direct donation: BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC… reddit.com
r/btc - Flipstarter: Bitcoin Cash for the Freedom Convoy Direct donation: BCH: bitcoincash:qz2zrkq2uzevpyxjqekfwedy3umzvzczq5zp8vc8v0 BTC: bc1qw9aas8590yak6utmzks2fa8un65zkhxv4f87p6 ETH … web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

@reseeit save thread.

print3_d
Posted - March 20, 2024 at 11:27 PM
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 11:39 PM

@print3_d - PRINT3D..

How many others are getting paid on twitter to lie to you? https://t.co/eMXOuKWrgD

@ProjectTabs - Project TABS

Michael Rapaport Admits He Indeed Does Get Paid Money For Pro Israel And Hamas posts or is it a ploy to get us to stop posting pro Palestine content? https://t.co/COJvJdKPBC

Video Transcript AI Summary
I make money from pro-Israel, pro-Zionist, pro-Jewish posts, and get paid more for pro-Hamas comments. I earn extra for comments like "from the river to the sea" or with the Palestinian flag. My deal is confidential, but I profit from certain posts and comments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I you got me. I I I make money off of all these posts. Okay? Yes. I make I make I I don't wanna say how much money I make off of these posts, pro Israel, pro Zionist, pro Jewish post. Yes. I make money per post, and I get paid extra. I shouldn't be saying this, but I get paid extra every comment that's pro Hamas. So every time you guys make comments saying, you know, from the river to the sea or if you post the Palestinian flag or a watermelon, I get paid a little bit more. So I don't know what anyone else is doing. I don't know about their deals, but that that's my deal and I just wanna be honest about it. Okay? I just wanna be honest about it going forward that I do get paid off of of of a very pro Jewish, pro Israel post. When I say free the hostages, I get paid a little bit. I can't go into the details of the deal that I have made with the higher ups. I can't even say who they are, but it is true. And when you comment with Palestinian flags, I get paid more money. When you comment saying propaganda, I get paid even more. That that's all
print3_d
Posted - February 10, 2024 at 11:48 PM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 1:20 AM

@print3_d - PRINT3D.

I must being doing something right. Freedom of speech, not reach. https://t.co/CiJTxsjYpf

print3_d
Posted - February 11, 2024 at 12:12 AM
Saved - February 11, 2024 at 12:53 AM

@print3_d - PRINT3D.

wrote a letter to X about my "new label" will bug them relentlessly clogging up there customer service lines by intentionally misspelling things so AI can't read it and it has to be done with a human. I will 5000 emails a day if i need to X 👍🏻 https://t.co/Qq8EbuLQgh

print3_d
Posted - May 12, 2023 at 8:08 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, and Pierre Poilievre are seen as part of the "controlled WEF opposition" by the author. They are accused of pretending to be on our side while actually working towards agenda 2030. The author suggests listening to Grimes, Elon's ex, for more information.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

Elon Musk is a Globalist, playing on the same side as Jordan Peterson & Pierre Poilievre. They are what I call the "controlled WEF opposition." They play the good guys, while actually trying to guide us towards agenda 2030. This is Grimes Elon's EX.. listen carefully. https://t.co/YZmJJocVuM

Video Transcript AI Summary
AI could be the fastest way to achieve communism. If implemented correctly, it could solve scarcity and provide everyone with a comfortable life without the need to work. AI could automate farming, eliminate corruption, and bring us closer to genuine equality. It offers all the benefits of communism without the downside of collective farming, which is not desirable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a proposition for the communists. So, typically, most of the communists I know are not big fans of AI. But if you think about it, AI is actually the fastest path to communism. So if implemented correctly, AI could actually Theoretically, solve for abundance. Like, we could totally get to a situation where nobody has to work. Everybody is provider for with a Comfortable state of being, comfortable living. AI could automate all the farming, weed out systematic corruption, thereby bringing us to As close as possible to genuine equality. So basically, everything that everybody loves about communism, but without the collective farm. Because let's be real, enforced farming is really not a vibe.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

print3_d
Posted - January 19, 2023 at 8:47 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pierre Poilievre's alleged connection to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and support for their agenda is questioned in a series of posts. The posts highlight his hiring of WEF-affiliated individuals, failure to remove WEF members from positions, and support from former Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Additionally, his stance on issues such as mass immigration and vaccines, which align with WEF goals, is scrutinized. The posts also mention his support for the Ukrainian government.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

1 / 11 @PierrePoilievre is a arm of the WEF who supports the WEF Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG's) He like Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh all are on the same team. I will prove these fact on this meme in this 11 Part thread. Scroll down to read.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

2 / 11 If Pierre isn't part of the WEF why did he hire this WEF guy for his leadership race co-chair? 1-https://www.weforum.org/people/john-baird 2-https://web.archive.org/web/20220415002129/https://www.pierre4pm.ca/team 3-https://www.eurasiagroup.net/people/JBaird 4-https://www.eurasiagroup.net/people/gbutts

World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
Endorsements Join me in making Canada the freest nation on earth web.archive.org
Eurasia Group | John Baird eurasiagroup.net
Eurasia Group | Gerald Michael Butts eurasiagroup.net

@print3_d - PRINT3D

3 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why doesnt he fire WEF Michelle Rempel Garner. She said to Trudeau " enough with the woke sh1t" yet she defends drag shows for kids. 1-https://www.weforum.org/people/michelle-rempel-garner 2-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7BxDcpFdjc 3-https://theparadise.ng/supposedly-anti-woke-mp-michelle-rempel-attacks-parents-protesting-all-ages-drag-show/

World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
Page not found | The Paradise News theparadise.ng

@print3_d - PRINT3D

4/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why would he actually appoint Tony Clement a WEF member to the board of conservative fund for the CPC? Doesn't make much sense does it? 1-https://ottawa.citynews.ca/national-news/former-tory-mp-tony-clement-appointed-to-board-of-conservative-fund-sources-582692 2-https://www.weforum.org/people/tony-clement

Former Tory MP Tony Clement appointed to board of Conservative Fund: sources OTTAWA — Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has appointed former member of Parliament Tony Clement to serve on the board of the Conservative Fund, the federal party's main fundraising arm, sources say. ottawa.citynews.ca
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

5 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why doesn't he remove Andrew Scheer from the CPC? Andrew scheer was on the WEF website but quietly removed back during the trucker convoy in Feb 2022. 1-https://web.archive.org/web/20220219134642/https://www.weforum.org/people/andrew-scheer

Andrew Scheer Andrew Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as the Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle since 2004 and as the leader of the conservative party and leader of the official opposition since 2017. He was one of the youngest MPs when he was first elected and his vision and leadership have earned him the continued confidence to be re-elected. web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

6 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why did he lie about not having any WEF members? Pierre himself was in fact listed on the "people" section of the WEF website. During the trucker convoy (Feb 2022) he was quietly removed. 1- https://web.archive.org/web/20210401060525/https://www.weforum.org/people/Pierre-poilievre

Pierre Poilievre The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. web.archive.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

7/ 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why is he being supported by the globalist WEF member and ex-PM Steven Harper who originally signed Canada onto the WEF's UN agenda 2030 in 2015? (the SDG's) 1-https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/former-conservative-pm-stephen-harper-endorses-pierre-poilievre-for-party-leader-1.6002020 2-https://www.weforum.org/people/stephen-harper

Former Conservative PM Stephen Harper endorses Pierre Poilievre for party leader Former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper has endorsed Pierre Poilievre to be the party's next leader. ctvnews.ca
Stephen Harper Bachelor's and Master's degree in Economics, University of Calgary. 2002, Leader of the Opposition; co-founded Conservative Party and won party leadership; 2006, Prime Minister of Canada. Recipient of awards: Woodrow Wilson Award for Public Service; first Canadian to be awarded B'nai Brith Presidential Gold Medallion for Humanitarianism (2008). weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

8/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why did lie on camera to @MarkFriesen08 claiming that he did "not read" the SDGS. To be clear, PP the "development minster" claimed he did not read the "Social Development Goals" that he voted on multiple times. 1-https://rumble.com/v1vz45q-pierre-poilievre-meets-mark-friesen-and-claims-to-know-nothing-about-the-sd.html

Pierre Poilievre meets Mark Friesen and claims to know nothing about the SDG Clip of Pierre Poilievre flat out lieing when he meets Mark Freisen as he claims to know nothing about the SDG (sustainable development goals) even though pierre was the Minister of Employment and Soc rumble.com

@print3_d - PRINT3D

9/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why is he supported by, surrounding himself with, Hiring, and appointing WEF members if he's working against them? 🧐 1-https://web.archive.org/web/20210401060525/https://www.weforum.org/people/Pierre-poilievre 2-https://web.archive.org/web/20220219134642/https://www.weforum.org/people/andrew-scheer 3-https://www.weforum.org/people/michelle-rempel-garner 4-https://www.weforum.org/people/john-baird

Pierre Poilievre The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. web.archive.org
Andrew Scheer Andrew Sheer is a Canadian politician serving as the Member of Parliament for Regina-Qu'Appelle since 2004 and as the leader of the conservative party and leader of the official opposition since 2017. He was one of the youngest MPs when he was first elected and his vision and leadership have earned him the continued confidence to be re-elected. web.archive.org
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org
World Economic Forum | 404: Page cannot be found weforum.org

@print3_d - PRINT3D

10/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why does he support mass immigration, like Trudeau and Jagmeet and WEF globalist's want. This is also another WEF SDG. Why? Immigration will increase housing prices for everyday Canadians and decrease average wages.

@PierrePoilievre - Pierre Poilievre

We have 26,000 nurses who’ve been trained abroad and are ready and willing to work in Canada to fill the health care worker shortage, but they can’t, because gatekeepers won’t let them. Remove the gatekeepers, and let qualified nurses work in Canada. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/major-immigration-backlog-leaving-thousands-of-trained-health-care-professionals-on-the-sidelines-1.6015229

Major immigration backlog in Canada leaving thousands of trained health-care professionals on the sidelines As hospitals across the country struggle under the weight of major staffing shortages, an immigration backlog described by lawyers as the worst they have ever seen is leaving qualified health professionals sitting on the sidelines. ctvnews.ca

@print3_d - PRINT3D

11 / 11 If PP isn't part of the WEF then why does he still support vaccines, the UN SDG goal #3? Even when there is ample evidence the 💉 has many negative side effects. Pfizer's own listed side effects (link #2) 1-https://t.co/qlWl1SoQLg 2- https://t.co/f4JRmeQ5JL https://t.co/M1gtLZWxnW

@UncleNestor22 - Nestor

Pfizer Pierre in his recent role as part time marketing exec for Big Harma! Critiquing a sitting govt for "not being globalist enough" is the only form of critique that's allowed under a flu d'état regime. #Uniparty

@healthbyjames - James Cintolo, RN FN CPT

Pfizer lists over 1300 side effects associated with their mRNA vaccine — here they are. This is being suppressed…… @Johanne31785773 https://t.co/FKFDbBUdwe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the Prime Minister for not prioritizing vaccines during the crisis. They point out that while the rest of the world was being vaccinated in January and February, Canada's vaccination rates are lower. They blame the Prime Minister for allowing the spread of variants, which has led to restrictions in Canada. The speaker questions why other countries had access to vaccines earlier while Canada did not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Carlton. Well, what they needed is vaccines. Yeah. That was the one job he had at this point in the crisis. Now he tries to throw on a cape and says he's the hero that's going to solve the problem that he caused. Yeah. The reality is the rest of the world was being vaccinated in January February. Vaccination rates in the US and UK are twice what they are here in Canada. The rest of the world is reopening. Well, we're being confined to our basements because of the wave of the variance that this prime minister allowed. Why did the rest of the world have access to vaccines in January February while we did not?

@print3_d - PRINT3D

BONUS 12/11 If PP isn't part of the WEF why does he support the dictator in Ukraine Like LPC & NDP? 4 Billion wasted and counting to Ukraine, this increases our inflation and supports nazis that wont win against Russia anyways. https://t.co/GgKyB0Y50z

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@DiamondsQu33n @reSeeIt save thread

print3_d
Posted - November 10, 2023 at 5:16 PM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: Pierre Poilievre and the CPC party's plans align suspiciously with the UN's Agenda 21. Watch @sophiadahl1's video and decide for yourself. Consider supporting the PPC instead of the CPC. Post 2: @reSeeIt save thread.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

Don't believe Pierre Poilievre or the CPC party in 🇨🇦 are UN controlled? Watch @sophiadahl1 's video first, then watch the Pierre clip.. Odd how his plans are identical to the UN's. 🧐 https://x.com/sophiadahl1/status/1722787777849262439?s=20… Wake up people. CPC isn't the solution. PPC is.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To maximize the potential of transit stations, we should build high-density apartments around them. Currently, many stations lack housing despite available land and the large amount of money invested in their construction. To address this, I propose using federal funding for transit as leverage. City mayors seeking federal money would be required to approve high-density apartments near their stations. This would benefit seniors and students by providing convenient access to public transportation, eliminating the need for a car. Calgary City Hall has already approved a similar plan, with housing connected to a station via a walkover bridge.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Moral of the story. We need to approve high density apartments around every future transit station, something we don't do now. There are many stations across the country that took 1,000,000 of dollars to build, but there's very little housing around them even though there's available land. And that means that we're not getting the maximum potential out of the massive expense that we put into those transit stations. The federal government funds transit. My common sense plan is to use that funding as leverage. I'm gonna say to the big city mayors, If you want federal money for your transit station, you have to approve high density apartments all around them so that seniors and students don't even need to afford a car. The Calgary, city hall approved this one over here as well. More housing over here. Folks are able to come down the elevator, get on to this little walkover and go over to the station in order to get on the train and head wherever they are going.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

1/2 ⛔️Under the United Nations' plan for total global control known as Agenda 21(which later evolved into Agenda 2030),all humans who once lived on farms and in rural areas, are to be forcibly relocated into densely populated"smart" cities,referred to as "human settlements"‼️🙏👇 https://t.co/u5UWhRiJeC

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1976, the United Nations introduced the Habitat 1 plan at the Vancouver Convention, which aimed to relocate people from rural areas to cities, now called human settlements. The idea behind this plan was to concentrate populations in specific areas to reduce energy, water, and transportation usage. As a result, people would stay at home more, potentially even working from home, and rely less on cars and energy. The UN's focus on sustainable development led to the phasing out of single-family homes, which they considered suburban sprawl. Instead, people would live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. This concept of "smart growth" or "new urbanism" advocates for using only the necessary amount of space. The overall goal is to make private transportation and owning homes less desirable, promoting the idea of being a responsible global citizen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Recall we mentioned the United Nations Habitat 1 plan that came down at the Vancouver Convention in 1976. Under this plan, all humans that once lived on farms and in rural areas, so called wild lands, will be relocated to cities now referred to as human settlements. Speaker 1: And, the idea is that if you concentrate populations Into specific areas or zones, less energy usage, less water usage, and less transportation. So people will, have less reason To leave home, they'll, stay in their homes. They may even work out of their homes. And, so they're not gonna be using, their cars. They're gonna be using energy, and, they're not gonna be using water. Speaker 0: Since, as we saw earlier, the UN is not big on property rights, It should come as no surprise that the first private property to be phased out will be single family homes, what socialist at UN Headquarters consider suburban sprawl. Instead, We The People will live in apartments and condos in megacities near railroad tracks. Our super tall dwelling units will all be built to UN specified building codes authorized by Ickley, COGS, the ADA and a myriad of NGOs and other friends of sustainable development. While the animals run wild in continental Corridors, We, the humans, will live in transit villages and smart cities. Speaker 1: Smart growth or Our new urbanism, is that ideology that says that you shouldn't have more space than you actually need. So if you're a couple of people living in a 3 bedroom house, well, you don't need that extra space. So why do you have it? Speaker 2: It there's a a clear concerted effort to make it really just about as miserable as possible To exist and use your own private transportation, own your own home, all impetus and incentive, In financial and otherwise, is to convince people that it is unsustainable, to live in your own home, Have air conditioning. It is their duty as a human being, as a global citizen, you see. You

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

print3_d
Posted - June 18, 2023 at 12:22 AM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pierre Poilievre has been accused of lying about his knowledge of the SDGs. Despite voting in favor of bills related to the SDGs and being a member of the SDG committee, he claimed to know nothing about them. A referenced article provides proof of his contradictory statements.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

🧵1/2 Pierre Poilievre lied about reading the SDG's. PP voted yea on Bill C-474, Bill C-57, and the Paris accord all SDG's. He's also a member of ENVI which is 🇨🇦's SDG committee. PPC will remove us from the SDG's Why would PP claim to know nothing about the SDG's? ⬇️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a plan that was agreed to by a 179 Nations. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now, all over the world. It is the inventory and control plan. Inventory and control of all land, All water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all Food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed 2 by a 179 Nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the agenda for the 21st century, and so many of us around the world think that, while sustainable And it just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and, and creating energy and food resources for everyone, and the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, Concentrated city centers and clearing them out of the rural areas. All systems have to be Brought into harmony in order to control them all. Because when systems don't meet, when they're when they're out of balance or not in sync with one another, They can't be controlled centrally. And the goal of Agenda 21 is 1 World Government and total control from a central unit. Every nation that signed on to Agenda 21 has its, its local Agenda 21 plan. People in the United States are completely unaware of this. If I go out and talk about this, the United States press will attacks me, and calls me, which is, it's totally ridiculous. It is a, But it's not a theory, it's fact. The 3 pillars of United Nations Agenda 21 are Economy, Ecology, and Equity, the 3 E's. And everyone sort of thinks that they know what that means, the idea Social equity. It must mean that, well, everyone's going to have access to clean water and clean air, and, no one's, property is going to be used as a Ground because they are at a poverty level. But really what social equity is about, it's about impoverishing Huge portions of the population and bringing down, developed the developed nations. Everything that we're looking at now is Destined to collapse our economies. It's a totalitarian state to being developed right now all over the world, and what major corporations want in this development is to be able to, to have movement full movement of Of workers without borders or boundaries to be able to move their goods through without regulations, and to reduce wages. And so this is the goal, so this is what you find with social equity. And of course, economy and, ecology is about are the 3 circles: economy, ecology, and social equity, and where they meet in the center is balance, but really that balance It's a communitarian balance. So it's not balance of well-being of the people. What it is is it's a balance or corporation so that they can exploit and control and have populations in an area in tightly packed dense areas so that they can be surveilled and managed. And this is what that Balance looks like as far as the development of totalitarian state is. The mainstream media is owned by 5 major corporations, and you're not Going to get this information from the mainstream press. So you need to be your own press. You need to educate yourself. You need to get out there and Educate your neighbors, your community, your real community. You need to help your children understand that they're being indoctrinated from pre kindergarten to postgraduate school. All of us have a responsibility to ourselves and to others. This is true community To work for personal freedom. And always remember that even though we work as a group, if we do work as a group, we're all individuals In those groups, and we answer only to ourselves. And this is essential. It's essential as as as free human beings. This is what we are. We are free and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have To become aware that there is a fight, and then make our friends and our neighbors and our community aware as well, and work together.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

🧵2/2 Proof PP lies 1 - https://rumble.com/v2uv2rg-pierre-poilievre-meets-mark-friesen-lies-about-reading-the-un-sdg.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5 PP lies 2 - ENVI- https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/ENVI/Members?includeAssociates=True#AssociateMembers Article proving pierre lied https://boereport.com/2020/11/20/economic-triage-for-canada-in-the-face-of-green-agendas-and-net-zero/

Pierre Poilievre meets Mark Friesen Lies about reading the UN SDG Clip of Pierre Poilievre flat out lieing when he meets Mark Freisen as he claims to know nothing about the SDG (sustainable development goals) even though pierre was the Minister of Employment and Soc rumble.com
ENVI - Members - House of Commons of Canada A list of current and past members of the Environment and Sustainable Development. Link to each Member's individual profile or find information about associate members of the committee. ourcommons.ca
Economic triage for Canada in the face of green agendas and net-zero | BOE Report As the Canadian federal government proposed net-zero legislation this week in the House of Commons, issues around net-zero and the green agenda could mean big problems for consumers and significant disconnects for the Canadian economy. This week, in a virtual panel discussion, MP Pierre Poilievre, Jack Mintz, Dan McTeague, and Catherine Swift discussed the UN boereport.com

@therobprimo1 - ◻️ Rob Primo ◻️

Me: Does the Conservative Party under your leadership support the “United Nations Sustainable Development Goals” Pierre: I don’t know what those are but I don’t support anything imposed on us by any global organization. Me: I asked why he voted in favor in 2017 then? Pierre: “I’m not sure I don’t know what they are”

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

bambkb
Posted - September 5, 2023 at 7:49 PM
Saved - September 5, 2023 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user points out that in 2019, the Canadian Parliament removed a law that made it illegal for the government and media to spread misinformation to the public. Another user acknowledges this fact.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨This is probably one of the most damning and disturbing findings in Canada 🇨🇦 that really paved the way for the media/government to deceive and lie to the public about #Covid and the #Vaccine🧐 Do you know that the Canadian Parliament removed a law that makes it ILLEGAL for the government/media to spread misinformation to the public in 2019!?😳 Why 2019? If that doesn’t make you think, I don’t know what will - Please listen to, Dr. Nagase explain👇 #Media #MSM #Lies #Deception

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2019, Bill C39 removed the crime of spreading false news from the Canadian Criminal Code. This change was discovered when comparing the 1954 and 2020 versions of the code. It raises questions about trusting the government, which is accused of stealing money, restricting effective treatments, and not properly investigating promoted vaccines. The parliament, elected to protect citizens, has granted mainstream media outlets like CDC and CTV the freedom to lie without consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll tell you what happened in 2019. There was something called Bill C39. I happened to come across a 1954 version of the Canadian Criminal Code. And in that 1954 version, there was a crime for spreading false news. That was an actual crime in 1954. And then I came across a 2020 version of the Canadian Criminal Code and I noticed that section was missing. So when was the crime of spreading false news removed from the Canadian Criminal Code? I did some more research. It was 2019. The spread of false news was removed from the Criminal Code of Canada by Parliament in 2019. So can we trust government? That's right. You can't trust an entire government that steals your money, tells you you can't take an effective treatment, doesn't even investigate the vaccines that it's promoting to see if they're pure, contaminated or just poisons from the get go. And you have a parliament that we supposedly elect that's looking out for us that says, you know what, we're just going to give CDC, CTV and all the mainstream media conglomerates, free reign to lie as much as possible with no consequences. Now.

@print3_d - PRINT3D 🇨🇦🇺🇸🌎

@bambkb Bill C-75. 1 Year before C19.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

@print3_d 🔥👍

View Full Interactive Feed