TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
List of thread topics: COVID19 vaccines, VAERS, PCR test, masks, lockdowns, mRNA approval for kids, post-autopsies, excess death, government censorship, religion, Covid safety, promoting compliance in Israeli military, sudden deaths, mass casualties, childhood placebo myth, Gardasil fraud, protocols that kill, side effects, BlackRock coup, decoding censorspeak.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is a list of all of my threads so far for ease of access. I appreciate the support, more to come. Thread Topics 🧵 1. COVID-19 Vaccines 💉 2. VAERS📉 3. The PCR “Test”🧪 4. Masks 😷 5. Lockdowns 🔒 6. mRNA Approval for Kids 💉 7. Post 💉 Autopsies 8. Excess Death💀
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
💉
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
📉🤕
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
🧪
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
😷
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
🔒
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
💉👶🏻
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
💀💉
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
⬆️💀
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Government Censorship
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
💉Religion
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Covid 💉 Safety or lack thereof
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Promoting 💉 compliance in the Israeli military
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Died Suddenly
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mass Casualties
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Childhood 💉 Placebo Myth
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Gardasil Fraud
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Protocols that kill
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
💉 Side effects
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The BlackRock Coup
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Decoding Censorspeak
reSee.it AI Summary
There is ongoing debate about the existence of COVID-19. Some argue that health authorities have failed to provide evidence of the virus in court cases. They claim that transmission and isolation methods are flawed. Skeptics argue that no one has successfully isolated and characterized the virus. These viewpoints challenge the mainstream narrative. However, it's important to note that these claims are controversial and not widely accepted.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
Thread. 1. There is no covid, it doesn't exist. Links also below short video, one where you can send evidence of the said virus and claim £1.5 million reward, no one has in over 2 years. 19 minute watch:👇 https://rumble.com/vkfsu9-the-emporer-has-no-corona-it-does-not-exist.html
THE EMPEROR HAS NO CORONA, IT DOES NOT EXIST!
Absolute scam of the century! Dr. Andrew Kaufman: https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/ SOVI - Statement on Virus Isolation - Add your name: https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/sovi/ Dr. Tom Cowan: https://drtomcowan.
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
2. The same thing happened in court cases in Spain, Portugal and South Africa where the relavent health authorities couldn't produce proof of the virus to the courts. It doesn't exist.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
6. South Africa had millions of these alledged 'cases', but the South African health authority could not produce proof of the said virus to the court. https://rumble.com/vrths7-show-us-the-virus-case-before-south-africas-constitutional-court.html
"SHOW US THE VIRUS" CASE BEFORE SOUTH AFRICA'S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
Webpage: https://www.showusthevirus.info/
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
7. Same culturing was done here, and the same results achieved, including the same sort of pictures we see on many so called isolation papers, the difference here is there was no sample from a sick person included, just the all other elements of the soup. https://odysee.com/@CosmicEvent:5/CPE---Control-Experiment---21-April-2021---English-version:00
CPE - Control Experiment - 21 April 2021 - English version
Source: https://odysee.com/@DeansDanes:1/cpe-english:f?r=9RZFLB9t7CRG1awRMscPxRjjcRSnhXVo
odysee.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
8. Ex head of respiratory for Pfizer global for nearly two decades.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that there is a global crime being committed by those in power who have exaggerated the threat of a new respiratory virus. They argue that there is no real health threat and that the only moving part in this situation is the PCR test. The speaker questions the existence of respiratory viruses and believes that people still get ill with similar symptoms as before, but the cause is unknown. They conclude that these illnesses are not caused by respiratory viruses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The, the powers that be, I'll call them the perpetrators. People running this global crime. It is a global crime to take over all of humanity. What they've done is they, pretended that there was a serious new respiratory viral health threat. Okay?
That's what we did this virus in Wuhan. In my opinion there never was an exaggerated. There was never any new health threat whatsoever. Partly the beauty of this, it can't go wrong because there's no moving parts. It's literally the only moving part is the PCR test.
So the initial thing, an exaggerated health threat. Now some people believe there's a new virus, But if so, it's not any more serious than influenza, not really, because flu vanished at the same time by sheer coincidence. Personally, I didn't I actually have come to the conclusion and I will Credit, you know, Andrew Cowan and his colleagues. I had a really good chat with those guys early in 2020 and it bothered me, bothered me, bothered me. I realized over time I could no longer maintain my understanding of respiratory viruses as I thought I knew them.
And then I learned a new bit of information recently and it was just it collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses as described exist at all. They don't. People do get ill and people are ill. People people had exactly the same illnesses, Peter and your listeners, exactly the same illnesses As before that horrible union said, viruses don't exist. They still have, quotes, colds and quotes flu.
You know, they they It's just I I think we don't know what causes them and they're not respiratory viruses.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
Video Transcript AI Summary
Viruses don't exist, according to the speaker. They argue that the process used to prove the existence of viruses is flawed, as it relies on adding samples from sick individuals to monkey cells and observing cell death. However, even when no sample is added, the cells still die. This suggests that viruses may not be real. The speaker refutes the theory of viruses and states that the cause of illness could be exposure to toxins or other factors. They compare it to refuting the existence of an evil butt gremlin under a bed based on lack of evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dear world, Viruses don't exist. I know that sounds crazy, but sometimes we get things wrong. And it gets passed along for centuries and centuries until a few brave people try and change things. See they take a sick person and assume they have a virus without ever finding and isolating plating that viral particle and validating that it's there. So they take a sample of that sick person's boogers and put it on some monkey kidney cells that are already weakened and starved of nutrients.
In the same culture, they add a number of ingredients. 2 of those ingredients are Anthoterycin and Gentamicin. These are nephrotoxic antibiotics. Antibiotics kill life. Nephrotoxins specifically kill kidneys.
Now the marker for proving any new virus is the cytopathic effect, a k a cell death. When those monkey Esols die. Boom. You got yourself a new virus, at least according to mainstream science. That's like putting paper into fire and expecting it not to burn.
Yep. Viruses are an inside job. The problem here, besides the fact that they never validated a virus to begin with, is that virologists don't do a complete experiment. How scientific. Doctor Stefan Lanka, however, decided to actually do controls.
He did the same culture experiments without adding any sample from any sick person. And guess what? Those monkey cells still died. So the marker for proving a virus is present with no virus, even if you believe there was ever one in there. This can only mean that there is no such thing as viruses according to the process they use to prove them.
And yes, all viruses are proven this way. I know what you're thinking, well, if there are no viruses, then what's making people sick? Well, it's not my job to figure that out. I'm refuting a theory. Imagine your kid tells you he heard noises and there's an evil butt gremlin under his bed.
So you check under the bed, There's no evil butt gremlin anywhere in sight. You refuted his theory of evil butt gremlins. And he says, well, if there are no evil butt gremlins, Then why did I hear those noises? Who knows? Could have been a drafty window, could have been a creaky floor.
But we do know it wasn't an evil butt gremlin. Just like we do know, people aren't getting sick from a floating sub microscopic particle. Could have been common exposure to toxins, bad
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
12. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (217 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
Video Introduction:Official Evidence that Virology is Pseudoscience – Christine Massey June 10 2023:https://www.bitchute.com/video/gvu4NbieSuVb/ [Go here for FOIs on other imaginary "viruses", here for FOIs on "virus" control experiments and here for FOIs on whether bacteria have been shown to CAUSE disease.] Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material ... [Read more...]
fluoridefreepeel.ca
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
14. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2023/01/no_author/the-no-virus-theory-from-an-austrian-perspective/
The No-Virus Theory From an Austrian Perspective - LewRockwell
We students of Austrian Economics are also research students of history, which is our lab work. Let’s for a minute conduct a “thought experiment” where, 100 years from now in 2123, virtually no one has ever heard of Ludwig von Mises or what we call Austrian Economics. Instead, the world is dominated (as it is today) only by the so-called economics of John Maynard Keynes and his disciples – but in this frightening future there’s no opposition. No Hayek. No Rothbard. No Hoppe. No Ron Paul. No Mises Institute. Would the Wikipedia of that time answer searches for “Austrian Economics” … Continue reading →
lewrockwell.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
Video Transcript AI Summary
The exosome, discovered in 1983, is a natural cell component that helps clean and repair cellular damage. It shares similarities with COVID-19, such as size, shape, ACE2 receptor, and RNA content. Some scientists suggest that the virus could actually be the exosome. However, questioning this theory or the unproven virus theory often leads to being labeled a conspiracy theorist or science denier. The only socially acceptable solution is seen as accepting an experimental vaccine that may alter DNA, which raises the question of who owns our bodies. Over 200 microbiologists have died under suspicious circumstances since the exosome's discovery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The exosome was discovered in 1983. Exosomes are created naturally within the cell to clean and repair cellular damage. Both exosomes and COVID nineteen are the same size and shape. They both have the same ACE two receptor, and they both contain RNA. Exosomes behave and appear the same as a virus.
Some scientists even claim that the so called virus is in fact the exosome. Since the discovery of the exosome, Over 200 microbiologists have been murdered, committed suicide, or died in a suspicious manner. If you question this mystery, you're undoubtedly labeled a conspiracy theorist. And if you question the current unproven virus theory, you are labeled a science denier. The only socially acceptable solution that you are allowed to accept is an experimental vaccine that will alter your DNA, which ultimately raises the question, who owns your body?
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
16. It is not the (isolated) virus but the lysate/isolate, i.e., soup from “culturing” the swab sample. The fact remains, no one has isolated, purified, and characterized the virus. Therefore, it is not available from anywhere. Sorry! https://bioanalyticx.com/buyer-beware/
Buyer Beware! – BIOANALYTICX
bioanalyticx.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
"germ" FOIs - UK HSA, Bigtree/ICAN, RFK Jr/CHD, WHO, CDC, Ayesha Verrall - no records!
February 1, 2023
christinemasseyfois.substack.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
18. Another so called virus. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173052/
Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-“H5N1” causation omitted
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
21. 👇👇👇 https://www.academia.edu/62145171/The_Covid_19_Fraud_and_War_On_Humanity
The Covid-19 Fraud & War On Humanity
The Covid-19 Fraud & War On Humanity
academia.edu
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
AUTHORS OF 'WHAT REALLY MAKES YOU ILL?' DISCUSS THEIR BOOK AND HEALTH IN GENERAL
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
25. https://www.cruxofhealth.com/tend-your-body/dr-stefan-lanka-dismantling-virus-theory/
Dr. Stefan Lanka: Dismantling the Virus Theory - The Crux of Health
Dr. Stephan Lanka dismantles the virus theory using measles virus as an example.
cruxofhealth.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
28. The Indian Council of Medical Research has been issued a legal notice to provide a public demonstration of proof of the virus and that it causes disease, so far they have not been forthcoming. https://rumble.com/v2cckze-no-virus-theory-is-international-dr-sam-bailey.html
NO VIRUS THEORY IS INTERNATIONAL – DR SAM BAILEY
The Indian Council of Medical Research has been issued a legal notice to provide a public demonstration of proof of the virus and that it causes disease, so far they have not been forthcoming.
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
29. The bottom line of this matter is not about what Mr. Kennedy or anyone else believes. Rather, it’s about whether they report accurately the known fact that no government can produce evidence of an actual SARS-CoV-2 sample taken from a human being. https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/why-is-robert-f-kennedy-jr-running?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web
Why is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. running from the missing virus problem?
The leader of Children's Health Defense doesn't acknowledge that every government in the world admits they have no clinical sample of SARS-CoV-2. Why do all of his publications conceal this fact?
planetwavesfm.substack.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
30. Massage to Peter McCullough and other virus believers, from Tom Cowan.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is requesting proof that a pure virus has been obtained through electron microscopy, with no other particles present. They also want evidence that the virus came from the original person and that all nucleic acids come from the purified virus, not from other sources. They emphasize the need for validation of the vaccine production process and question whether the virus was found in its natural ecosystem. They also ask for proof that the cytopathic effect could only come from the virus. The speaker hopes for a response in either video or written form to further discuss these points.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's be very clear what we're asking you. We're asking you to present proof, evidence, that at some point in this process, you have obtained a pure virus, you've seen it on an electron microscopy, there's nothing else in there but the virus, you've proven that that virus came from the original person, you've then proved that all of the nucleic acids come from that particle, which you have purified, that there's no chance those particles came from the cells or the fetal bovine cap serum or anything else part of that mix. That's what we're asking you, not whether they say they isolated it, not whether they say there's electron microscopy pictures, not whether they say that the PCR proves that there's a virus, even though they got the PCR test essentially without even having an isolated or purified virus, which is their own words. We are asking for validating the methodology of that vaccine production process, which you stated should be considered proof that they isolated the virus. I'm hoping that this is very clear and in any future discussions we have about the existence of the virus, It has to start with: a) Did you find the virus in its natural ecosystem?
The answer of course is no. And then if you isolate the virus as you say through the cell culture process, how did you prove that the virus was existed in the 1st place in order to do an experiment with it, and how have you proven that the cytopathic effect could have only come from the virus? Because every experiment that we've looked at as shown just the opposite, so hopefully that is very clear and I can either wait for your answer either from a video or written or hopefully you can look into this and then we can have a, discussion as I proposed in my email.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
31. Mike Yeadon has since changed his mind as per video clip at tweet No 8 above. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/peter-mccullough/
Communications with Peter McCullough and other freedom advocates
Earth to Dr. McCullough - November 15, 2021: As a result of some rather snarky public statements made by Dr. Peter McCullough (@38:20 here) insisting that: "the virus" has been isolated and sequenced,people saying otherwise are asking a "trick question", and PCR tests are "legit"... ...I asked Dr. McCullough, via an email list that we were both ... [Read more...]
fluoridefreepeel.ca
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
Moderna Never Had A Sample Of The Virus | Armstrong Economics
This video clip shows that Moderna never even has a sample of the virus to make a vaccine. It was all just theoretical computer science.
armstrongeconomics.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
THIS IS THE MOTHER OF ALL LIES & THEY’RE DESPERATE TO KEEP IT HIDDEN FROM YOU
What if the very foundation of the modern medical industrial complex is built upon a lie so big, that it would undo their entire system if the public found out? Joining me today is Dr. Tom Cowan, an a
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
38. https://feli-popescu.blogspot.com/2018/09/still-no-proof-for-measles-virus.html?m=1
Jurnal si introspectii de mamica - Feli Popescu: Still no proof for the measles virus
data:blog.metaDescription
feli-popescu.blogspot.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
42. https://healthglade.com/louis-pasteur-was-a-major-fraudster/
Louis Pasteur was a Major Fraudster
This video, Louis Pasteur was a Major Fraudster, was filmed at Napier Museum & Aquarium at Thiruvananthapuram Zoo, in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Our videos are on 4 video platforms, and we embed all 4 of them below, since they are highly controversial and one or more platforms may remove a video. Underneath the 4 videos, […]
healthglade.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
LOUIS PASTEUR AND QUESTIONS OF FRAUD
washingtonpost.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
Video Transcript AI Summary
Virologists are using pseudo scientific methods and changing the meaning of words to support their anti scientific practices. The COVID-19 fraud is centered around virology's claims. It is important to expose virology's fallacies to prevent future viral pandemics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virologists have resorted to creating their own pseudo scientific methods to replace the long standing scientific method, as well as changing the dictionary meaning of words in order to support their anti scientific practices. The heart of the COVID nineteen fraud is based on virology's claims. It is not a strategic mistake to direct our energy towards exposing virology's fallacies. Otherwise, defeating COVID nineteen responses while leaving the virological nonsense intact opens the door to any number of viral pandemics in the future.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
49. The whole scam blown apart in 11 minutes. 👇 https://rumble.com/v2e3uci-the-sars-cov2-smoking-gun-fraud.-there-is-no-virus.-11-minute-watch.html
The SARS-COV2 Smoking Gun Fraud. There is no virus. (11 minute watch)
Source/Credit: https://odysee.com/@LtCdData:1/The-SARS-COV2-Smoking-Gun-Fraud:d
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
50. From the above video, the whole scam exposed. 11 minute watch: 👇 https://rumble.com/v2e3uci-the-sars-cov2-smoking-gun-fraud.-there-is-no-virus.-11-minute-watch.html
The SARS-COV2 Smoking Gun Fraud. There is no virus. (11 minute watch)
Source/Credit: https://odysee.com/@LtCdData:1/The-SARS-COV2-Smoking-Gun-Fraud:d
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
52. 👇👇👇 https://curtiscost.substack.com/p/uncensored-interview-with-christine
Uncensored - Interview With Christine Massey
Watch now (127 mins) | COVID "Virus" - Where's The Proof?
curtiscost.substack.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
53. €1.5 million reward for proof of the alleged virus still goes unclaimed after 2 plus years.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
54. https://ideasdaily.net/2022/09/04/germ-theory-is-a-hoax/
GERM THEORY IS A HOAX
Always remember that it is easier to fool people than to persuade them they have been fooled.It requires a courageous person to humble themselves in front of the Truth and admit they not only were wrong but fell into a trap. If this post helps even one person end their fear of themselves, nature and…
ideasdailynet.wordpress.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
55. https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/SARS-CoV-2-has-not-been-isolated.html?m=1
ORWELL CITY
Alternative news Big Brother dislikes.
He doesn't want you to know that graphene oxide + 5G = COVID-1984.
Down with Big Brother!
orwell.city
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
57. The last 5 minutes or so says it all. https://www.bitchute.com/video/qfDIq36NBKli/
WHAT is GOING ON with the "VIRUS" ! (Dr. Tom Cowan / Jon Rappoport)
================
(world orders review)
================
WHAT is GOING ON with the "VIRUS" ! (Dr. Tom Cowan / Jon Rappoport)
================
@ WOR https://www.bitchute.com/channel/tangentopolis/
================
(source) Kim Osbøl
@ https:/…
bitchute.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
58. Rumble link of the above video. https://rumble.com/v2ffxjk-what-is-going-on-with-the-virus-dr.-tom-cowan-jon-rappoport.html
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE "VIRUS" ! (DR. TOM COWAN / JON RAPPOPORT)
The last 6 or 7 minutes are damning.
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
59. The most important part of this video. Full video from above 2 tweets.👇 https://rumble.com/v2ffxjk-what-is-going-on-with-the-virus-dr.-tom-cowan-jon-rappoport.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the lack of necessary controls in scientific research on SARS-CoV-2. They mention that very few examples of implemented controls exist, but the results are alarming. Scientists from Switzerland were able to extract the whole genome of SARS-CoV-2 without the presence of the virus itself. Similarly, scientists from China obtained numerous SARS-CoV-2 sequences without any virus in cell cultures. The speaker suggests contacting the Chinese scientists for more information. They also mention that using raw reads, it is possible to assemble other viruses like measles and HIV. The speaker finds these findings shocking and believes it is important to discuss the implications with doctors, scientists, and anyone interested in the topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then, yeah, I've been thinking about maybe we should actually find out if this is real. So there was a final response, almost no one carries out the necessary controls. That really shocked me. There is about, 250,000 stars scope 2 publications, for example. No controls no controls of the sequencing, not one, and Marvin will explain that even further.
There are very few examples of implemented necessary controls. However, the results are frightening. Scientists from Switzerland have extracted RNA from uninfected supernatant cells, that's the cell culture liquid, treated the same way as the infected cells, but virus free and applied de novo approach, The result is the whole genome SARS CoV 2. Again, you do it without the virus, you sequence it so called, assemble it, you get the virus. Scientists from China get a lot of SARS CoV 2 sequences without the presence of any virus from cell cultures.
I have documentation, but I don't share this at the moment. I'd love to see that. If you're interested, I could ask to share it with you. So I would actually try to contact this guy and say, let's see what these scientists from China who get a lot of these SARS CoV 2 genomes without any virus. Also, with raw reads used to assemble SARS CoV 2, it is possible to assemble other viruses like measles and HIV.
It is the control experiment in the field of bioinformatics. In other words, another control could be take the raw reads, that's the pieces, and a and put it and ask the computer to find the measles genome, and they will. And he has the documentation apparently to show that. And if this isn't shocking to any doctor or scientist or person who has any knowledge or interest in this, I don't know what is. We should talk about how does a human
WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE "VIRUS" ! (DR. TOM COWAN / JON RAPPOPORT)
The last 6 or 7 minutes are damning.
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
62. Just to leave this here. Dirk, a member the Mutton crew deceivers gets exposed. Busted 100% 👇
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
We Have No Proof Covid-19 is Caused by a Virus - Astrid Stuckelberger, PhD.
THE HIGHWIRE - EPISODE 303: TIMELINE OF TYRANNY (1/19/23) Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is a former member of the research and ethics committee at the W.H.O. In this clip, she explains why Covid-19 symptom
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
65. https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/isolation-means-you-have-isolates
"An isolate is a virus that we have isolated from an infected host.. you grow virus in culture and then you have an isolate."
Presentation by Vincent Racaniello co author Principles of Virology
georgiedonny.substack.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
66. https://moonmaiden.substack.com/p/it-cant-leak-from-a-lab-if-it-does
It Can't Leak from a Lab if it Does Not Exist!
No Virus in History Has Ever Been Properly Purified/ Isolated
kristenwelchwellness.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
67. Stefano Scoglio, top expert in microbiology from Italy says that mRNA “vaccines” cause cells to produce spike proteins is a fairy tale, and there is no virus, it's never been proved to exist. Full video: 👇 https://rumble.com/v2g0bee-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the virus doesn't exist because it has never been proven or isolated. They mention that there have been 250 Freedom of Information Act requests worldwide asking for documentation on the virus's existence, but all have been answered with "we do not have it." Another speaker acknowledges that while the virus may not exist, particles claiming to be spike proteins do exist. However, the first speaker argues that spike proteins are synthetic and toxic, not found in nature or in the blood. They challenge supporters to find spike proteins in the blood and state that the only existing spike protein is the one made in the lab.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Absolutely. Also because the virus doesn't exist, you know. If the virus doesn't exist because it has been proved has never been proven to exist, has never been isolated, and we have almost 250 FOIA, Freedom of Information Act requests around the world asking, can you show me the documentation about the the isolation and therefore identification and therefore existence of the virus. All 250 answered, we do not have it.
Okay?
Speaker 1: Okay, but regarding the virus, it is said that, the virus doesn't exist But the particles claim to be viruses do exist and they may be, for example, the particles being produced by the body itself. The particles claim to be spike proteins. What is it then?
Speaker 0: Yes, it's a Spite protein produced in the laboratory, it doesn't exist in nature because the Spite protein is supposed to be a part of the virus that has never been isolated and therefore doesn't exist. So in nature there's no toxic spike protein, it's never been found, never been isolated, never been found in the blood. As I said before, I repeat, all they do they take a synthetic, lab made, lab created a protein that is toxic. And they, you know, they put it in touch with the antibodies and say that the antibodies are specific in this fraudulent way that I said before and therefore there must be Spike protein in the body. But Spike protein, if the virus is not proven to exist, there is no spike protein of the virus either.
And that's actually the case because the only spike protein existing it the one made in the lab. In fact, sometimes, and that's the other challenge the other challenge that I I advanced to the people, support these thesis. Sometimes when I talk and say these things they react by saying oh, but there's a lot of studies showing that the Spite protein is toxic. Yes. Go and read them.
There are only studies on the recombinant spike protein. On the protein made on the laboratory, in the laboratory. So again, the challenges, find this type protein in the blood and then we talk. There's no such thing. There's no there's no
mRNA “vaccines” cause cells to produce spike proteins is a fairy tale
Stefano Scoglio, top expert in microbiology from Italy says that mRNA “vaccines” cause cells to produce spike proteins is a fairy tale, and there is no virus, it's never been proved to exist. Source/C
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
68. Good article. https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
Virology - The Damning Evidence
The Stake In The Heart For This Pseudoscientific Profession
dpl003.substack.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
69. Dr Kevin McCairn is rude and unhinged in thos debate, he has to be muted at the end. https://rumble.com/v2g6tlu-does-sars-cov-2-exist-virus-debate-between-dr-mark-bailey-and-dr-kevin-mcca.html
DOES SARS-COV-2 EXIST? VIRUS DEBATE BETWEEN DR MARK BAILEY & DR KEVIN MCCAIRN
Source/Credit: https://www.bitchute.com/video/b7IyQiecEEoe/ Kevin's behaviour on the video was pretty dispicable, that's nothing, look what he said to a female Christine Massey in an email to her, wow
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
70. Dr Kevin McCairn really excels himself here, the way he speaks to a female in an email to her, what a disgusting pig! This is one of Steve Kirsch's mates! https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/why-i-now-refuse-to-debate-steve-kirsch-or-richard-fleming-or-kevin-mccairn/
The real reason I now refuse to debate Steve Kirsch (or engage with him, Richard Fleming or Kevin McCairn)
(hint: it's not what Steve tells his readers) Posted July 24, 2022: In response to Steve Kirsch's latest false and misleading hit-piece on my colleagues and I.... Incident #1: January 2022: Steve issued a debate challenge, then ran away On January 10, 2022 I wrote an open letter to Steve Kirsch: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/open-letter-to-steve-kirsch-january-10-2022/ Steve then contacted ... [Read more...]
fluoridefreepeel.ca
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers argue that scientific papers claiming the existence of SARS CoV-2 are flawed and lack scientific evidence. They believe these papers rely on faith rather than solid scientific methods. They point out that virologists have not been able to isolate the virus from bodily fluids or tissues. Stefan Lanka's experiment supports this claim, as he observed the same effects in a cell culture without adding any viral material. The speakers mention that virologists they spoke to refused to discuss isolation but focused on electron photographs and genomics as proof of the virus's existence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Read their papers, you will see that they have disproven themselves with their own writing. Right? Of course, you realize they are completely anti scientific because they are not crushing the base, The historical base and what they are doing, it's just a belief system. They're doing it in faith. And they came up with the conclusion.
It's easy to check this. Very easy. You see only the work with structures from cell cultures. And never ever were able to visualize something in the blood, from your mouth, from urine, from sperm, from more other kind of liquid or tissue in the body, never ever.
Speaker 1: I absolutely can tell you after a year of looking, there has not been one case in the published literature where a virologist or a scientist took somebody who was sick, Did the normal isolation procedures and said, here is this virus.
Speaker 2: To prove the point, Stefan Lanka conducted the same experiment without adding any material to a monkey kidney cell culture along with the antibiotics used in the SARS CoV two Experiments. His results were the same. Even without adding any so called viral material, He was able to see the cytopathic effects in the cell culture. I spoke with a number of virologists in making this documentary. None would appear on camera, except for Stefan Langan.
But when pressed about the issue of isolation, All of them tried to move the conversation to the 2 other ways that the scientific papers have claimed proof of the existence of SARS CoV 2, The electron photographs and the genomics.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
74. Regarding the measles 'virus'
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Stefan Lanka is appealing a court decision in which he is being sued by doctor David Bartens for €100,000. The court found that Bartens did not meet the criteria to prove the existence of the measles virus through a scientific publication, therefore he is not entitled to the reward. The appeal was partially successful, as the claimant failed to meet the criterion. The court also dismissed Bartens' appeal against the judgment. For more information, visit Doctor Lanka's website, lissenschaftpos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the description of the measles virus trial, you'll find the link to the judgment of the Hyatt Regional Court from 2016. The judgment is in German, but Google will do a decent translation. It's an 18 page long legal document containing over 9,000 words. Few people are going to read it. That's why I'll try to make it as short as possible.
Doctor Stefan Lanka is the defendant. He's appealing the previous court's decision and asking the higher court to dismiss the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff is doctor David Bartens. He's asking a higher court to award him €100,000 for detecting the measles virus. The court found that the appeal is partially inadmissible.
Insofar as it is admissible, it is also successful because the claimant doctor Bartons Did not meet the criterion of the claim to prove the existence of the measles virus through a scientific publication. The plaintiff is not entitled to the reward offered in accordance with section 657 of the German civil code. The prize money is paid out if a scientific publication is presented in which the existence of the measles virus is not only asserted, but also proven, and in which its diameter is determined. The prize money will not be paid out If the diameter of the measles virus is only based on models or drawings like this 1, a publication must be submitted in which the evidence is to be met in accordance with these requirements. The appeal insofar as it is admissible was successful because the claimant did not meet the criterion of the claim to prove the existence of the measles virus through a scientific publication.
The plaintiff is not entitled to any prejudicial legal fees. In its ruling of December 1, 2016, the federal court of justice dismiss the plaintiff's appeal against this judgment of the Stuttgart Hyatt Regional Court of February 16, 2016. You can find the link to the ruling in the description. To find out more, you can visit doctor Lenka's website, lissenschaftpos.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
77. Full link to the above two clips. https://rumble.com/v2d62s6-dr-lawrence-palevsky.html
Dr Lawrence Palevsky
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
79. Freemason Rockefeller pharma took control of medical industry and pushed their BS germ theory agenda. Longer version: 👇 https://youtu.be/6N-9qvgoOPQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
John Rockefeller used ruthless tactics such as bribery, price fixing, and corporate espionage to gain control of 90% of US oil production. He became the richest man in history and donated $100 million to his philanthropic front group, the general education board. Rockefeller then established the Rockefeller Foundation, which was later described as a self-serving menace to the nation. With his foundation's wealth and influence, Rockefeller worked with Andrew Carnegie to send Abraham Flexner on a tour to assess medical colleges and hospitals. The resulting Flexner report recommended centralizing medical schooling and promoting the pharmaceutical paradigm. This led to the closure of many medical schools and the suppression of alternative medicines. Rockefeller's actions also benefited US oil, mining, pharmaceuticals, telecom, and banking industries globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John Rockefeller's ruthless maneuvering, including bribery, price fixing, corporate espionage and creating shell companies to conduct illegal activities, had won his standard oil company control of 90% of US oil production and made him the richest man in world history. Rockefeller donated an additional $100,000,000 from that windfall to his philanthropic front group, the general education board to cement the streamlining and homogenization of medical schools and hospitals. Appeal for an ill became his foundation slogan. In 1913, he incorporated the Rockefeller Foundation. A congressional investigation described the foundation as a self serving artifice, posing a menace to the future political and economic welfare of the nation.
Using his foundation's wealth and influence and working with his friend, Andrew Carnegie, Rockefeller dispatch educator, Abraham Flexner on a cross country tours to catalog the status of America's 155 medical colleges and hospitals. The Rockefeller Foundation's Flexner report recommended centralizing America's medical schooling and reorienting these institutions According to Germ Theory, which held that germs alone cause disease. And advocated for the pharmaceutical paradigm, which emphasized targeting particular germs with specific drugs rather than fortifying the immune system through healthy eating, clean water and good nutrition. With that narrative in hand, Rockefeller financed campaigns to consolidate mainstream medicine, adopt the philosophies of the growing pharmaceutical industry and shutter its competition. Rockefeller's crusade caused the closure of more than half of American medical schools, fostered public and pressed corn for homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, nutritional, holistic, functional, integrative and natural medicines, and led to the incarceration of many practicing physicians developing world markets for US oil, mining, pharmaceuticals, telecom and banking multinationals.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
80. Biggest fraud against humanity - viruses have never been isolated!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Viruses have never been isolated, which is a major fraud against humanity. There is no measles virus, and each year a new virus with similar symptoms emerges. This started with the Third Reich and Doctor Enders. In my book, "A Second Thought about Viruses, Vaccines, and the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis," I discuss this issue. Even Professor Peter Guisberg lost his funding at Berkeley University for writing "Inventing the AIDS Virus" and questioning the existence of a virus. The situation is dire.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understands that the biggest fraud against this humanity our humanity is the fact that viruses have never been isolated. None. There is no measles virus. And once you understand the basic chemistry and biology of the fraud that they perpetuated on the human race, and each year, if you ever thought about this, why is there a new virus every year with a new name, with a similar types of symptomologies. This all started with the Third Reich and Doctor.
Enders and the so called viruses. I write about this in one of my books, a second thought about viruses, vaccines and the HIVAIDS hypothesis. And I'm not alone. Those who have been brave enough, who stood up, even Peter Guisberg, Professor Peter Guisberg at Berkeley University, a friend of mine, who wrote the book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, lost all of his funding at the university. When the Nobel Prize winner for discovering the so called HIV virus gets exiled to Beijing, because he's changing his mind about the existence of a virus.
This is how bad things are.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
86. So called virus isolation method has been a fraud from the very beginning. Molecular biologist speaks in the excellent below video. Source: 👇 https://rumble.com/v2id8z4-molecular-biologist-jerneja-tomsic-covid-dont-exist.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Virologists have been following outdated procedures and interpreting results based on false assumptions. They mistakenly believe that monkey kidney cells naturally contain the same virus as human measles, causing cell breakdown. However, it is actually the starving and poisoning procedure that leads to this breakdown. Despite acknowledging that monkey kidney cells are unsuitable for investigations, virologists continue to use them even after 55 years. This highlights the deception within the field, as virologists unknowingly deceive the public by following the teachings they were given.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But, I mean, essentially, the entire process is exactly the same as, what they were using back then.
Speaker 1: So that false assumption. As virologist doctor Stefan Lanka says, it's not that virologists are intentionally trying to deceive the public, But rather that they themselves have been deceived, they simply follow the procedures they were taught and interpret the results in the way they were taught. We can see this clearly in a virology study done by FRAP, Hi, Gordon and R. F. Baker, who reference the John Enders Measles paper for their own work.
They say monkey kidney cells, however, are unsuitable for investigations of the type reported here Because Enders, Wiebels and Ruckel showed that monkeys and cell cultures derived from monkeys are often infected with an agent seriologically indistinguishable From human measles virus, which causes cytopathic changes, meaning cell breakdown of monkey kidney cells and cultures, almost identical with those caused by human measles virus. In other words, instead of realizing it was the starving and poisoning procedure causing the cytopathic cell breakdown in both cultures, they assume that monkey kidney cells naturally had The same virus as the human measles, and that must be why they couldn't tell them apart from each other. They even go on to say that it Seemed likely that the measles virus they assumed was breaking down the monkey cells spreads from cell to cell, both via the surrounding nutrient fluid in the culture And directly from cell to adjacent cell. It is tempting to postulate that the cell to adjacent cell mechanism was mediated in part by the intercellular processes. Meaning their own common sense told them that this had to do with the cells themselves and not a virus, but it didn't fit their virus hypothesis, so they stopped thinking about it logically.
But what is more crazy is that even by their own logical fallacy, they at least admitted that they shouldn't be using monkey kidney cells for these cultures As they are unsuitable for investigations of these types. And yet to this date, 55 years later, virologists are still taught to use them
MOLECULAR BIOLOGIST JERNEJA TOMSIC - COVID DON'T EXIST
Jerneja Tomsic - Molecular Biologist - chats with courtenay, dirk and trina about PCR, viruses, genome sequencing and other theories along with gatekeepers, virus isolation and big pharma murder. Sour
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
87. THE CULT CHURCH OF VIROLOGY - CORONAVIRUS (LIES) Full video: 👇 https://rumble.com/v2ikdxe-the-cult-church-of-virology-coronavirus-lies.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Iatrogenic refers to unintentional harm caused by a physician's words or therapy. The speaker claims that modern medicine, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, infectionology, bacteriology, and virology are a for-profit iatrogenic death cult. They argue that these fields propagate debunked myths like bacterial infection, germ warfare, and contagious viruses based on the unproven germ theory. The speaker also criticizes Hollywood for promoting dystopian films about imaginary viruses. They conclude by stating that germ theory is fictional and that no isolated virus particle has been proven to cause disease.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Iatrogenic means death and injury caused unintentionally in a medical patient by a physician's words or therapy even if that physician treated the patient exactly as they were taught to in medical school and further training from pharmaceutical drug reps. The entire allopathic field of modern medicine, pharmaceuticals, vaccines, infectionology, bacteriology, and virology is nothing more than a for profit iatrogenic death cult tantamount to a dangerous worldwide religious cult causing endless human suffering and misery by propagating long ago debunked myths, such as bacterial infection, biological germ warfare, and contagious viruses, all based on the never proven germ theory. The tentacles of this $1,000,000,000,000 a year cult even reach as deep as Hollywood, pumping our heads full of frightening block bustard dystopian films about these disproven imaginary viruses wiping out all of humanity unless our heroes at the World Health Organization and the Center For Disease Control can race the clock to find the source of the single monkey or coconut responsible for wiping out the entire human race. This is, of course, absolute nonsense and propaganda. It is time we all learn the truth.
Germ theory is just a fictional theory like the existence of unicorns and leprechauns. It is not a fact. Airborne contagious viruses that attack, multiply, and destroy a living host have never been isolated or proven to exist, let alone cause disease. No one in the world has ever taken just a pure isolated virus particle with no other poisons or toxins or rotting animal flesh added
THE CULT CHURCH OF VIROLOGY - CORONAVIRUS (LIES)
Source/Credit: https://www.bitchute.com/video/c2UVhNtgOtlq/
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
88. ENDERS 1954 CONTROL TEST - THE END OF GERM THEORY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the validity of the germ theory, stating that no experiment has proven that a particle can make a person sick. They argue that this particle, which has never been isolated or genetically mapped, is the basis of the germ theory. The speaker claims that the theory rests on the assumption that the particle enters cells, multiplies, and kills them, but this has never been proven. They mention a study from 1954 where researchers demonstrated that the particle could be normal dead cell debris, not the cause of cell death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or you would be sick too. End of story. And since no experiment has ever been able to make a person ill by exposing them to another sick person, and since this particle has never in purified and isolated, genetically mapped, has never been directly found in the tissue or out of any living being, sick or well, injected into another person or animal solely by itself and made them sick, a whole germ theory rests on the baseless claim that this particle somehow enters the cell, multiplies, kills that cell and goes on to do the same elsewhere, otherwise known as the cytopathic effect theory. A that too has never been proven or shown to happen. But all that needs to be done to end virus germ theory once and for all, is to prove that this particle is just normal dead cell debris from a dying cell and not the cause of that cell's death, and that has actually already been done, not once, but twice.
The first time was back in 1954 in a paper called propagation and tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents, meaning toxins that kill cells from patients with measles, a study done by John f Enders, who invented this cell culture technique and Thomas c Peebles, they actually ran a control experiment where they didn't put any tissue or pus into the culture from a person with measles or any human being for that matter, they just starved and poisoned the monkey kidney tissue using the same techniques we have already described. And low and behold, on page 9 of their study, they admitted that a second
Video Transcript AI Summary
On page 9 of their study, it was found that a second agent was obtained from a culture of monkey kidney cells without any human measles material added. The changes observed in the monkey kidney tissue cells were similar to those caused by the measles virus. This suggests that the destruction of the cells was not caused by the theoretical measles virus, but rather by the procedure itself. The problem lies in the fact that Pasteur's personal diary, which revealed his fraudulent experiments, was not released until 45 years later. As a result, virologists like Enders and Peebles blindly believed in the existence of viruses without questioning this false assumption. It is not that virologists intentionally deceive the public, but rather that they have been deceived themselves by following the procedures and interpretations they were taught.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On page 9 of their study, they admitted that a second agent was obtained from an inoculated, meaning no human measles material added, culture of just monkey kidney cells. The cytopathic changes, meaning destruction of the monkey kidney tissue cells it induced in the unstained preparations could not be distinguished from the virus isolated from the measles, just like doctor Sellords of John Hopkins and doctor Hess of New York could not infect a healthy person with measles by injection from or exposure to a person with measles. In plain English. Enders and Peebles did the cell culture procedure both with the pus from measles patients and did the exact same procedure without the pus of any measles patients, and the monkey kidney cells broke down into identical particles of dead cell debris that could not be distinguished as any different from each other. And there's proved his own procedure of starving and poisoning the culture causes pathic effect, not the theoretical measles virus in the human snot or pus.
That should have been the end of virology. But the problem is Pasteur's personal diary self admitting that he was a fraud who lied and cheated all of his experiments wasn't released until 45 years later. So Enders and Peebles blindly believed that viruses had to be real without ever first double checking the premise of that false assumption. As virologist doctor unenacted. It's not that virologists are intentionally trying to deceive the public, but rather that they themselves have been deceived.
They simply follow the procedures they were taught and interpret the results in the way they were taught.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
89. THE END OF GERM THEORY, NOW FULLY DEBUNKED AS A CONSPIRACY THEORY https://rumble.com/v1auqro-the-end-of-germ-theory-now-fully-debunked-as-a-cospiracy-theory.html
THE END OF GERM THEORY, NOW FULLY DEBUNKED AS A CONSPIRACY THEORY
Alternative link: https://odysee.com/$/embed/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory/8e838b9625274e317cdb583bc0bd22ceeb0d7756 00:01:21 Dr Rosenau / US Public Health Service failed Spanish Flu contagion experimen
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
90. La Quinta Columna says there is no virus, they say the symptoms of Covid 19 were caused by RF radiation. They also criticize Musk for participating in the deception. https://rumble.com/v2ixxba-warning-to-all-humankind-10-mins.html
Warning to all humankind (10 mins)
La Quinta Columna says there is no virus, they say the symptoms of Covid 19 were caused by RF radiation. They also criticize Musk for participating in the deception. Source/Credit: https://www.laquint
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
91. https://rumble.com/v2jlwd6-germ-theory-is-dead.html
GERM THEORY IS DEAD
Source/Credit: https://www.bitchute.com/video/64E5a4jBFyum/
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
93. Not isolated or purified, just a computer generated sequence, in silico.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The existence of the virus is questioned due to the initial PCR test methodology being based on a computer model virus, not a purified isolate from real patients. China did not have a pure isolate, so they used elements of a genetic code to create a computer model sequence. This sequence became the basis for the PCR test. The WHO document states that the diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 should not rely on isolating the virus. The virus has never been purified, and the disease is based on generic symptoms that could be anything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's great questions over the existence of that virus that the official scientists and some of the distant scientists don't want to go near, which is to do with the fact that the initial test, the PCR test methodology, was based on a computer model virus. It was not based on a purified isolate from real patients because China didn't have that. When they gave the data to the core mandrosten authors to model the virus, they didn't have a sequence that was developed from a pure isolate. So they hadn't taken blood from patients and isolated from that a particular virus, they had some elements of a genetic code, which they modeled in silico computer modeling to produce what they said was a complete sequence and that was the basis for the PCR test that's now being used. They admitted that they developed a test based on in silico models' genetic sequence, not a real element taken from patients.
That's true. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's the truth. And the WHO in its own document given to the NHS, I got a copy of it from Maria Zambon herself, it said on one of the pages, diagnosis of SARS CoV-two should not be based on isolation of the virus. So it's telling the governments of the world, don't bother isolating it.
Trust us, it's, people will say that I'm speaking rubbish and I'll be castigated. I don't care. That is the truth. The virus that's never been purified, a disease that is based on set of generic symptoms that could be anything.
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
94. https://t.me/katesugakofficial/41
Kate Sugak
Friends, I have written many times about the Truth Isolate fund of 1,500,000€, which activists from Germany and Switzerland created 3 years ago. This money was raised to pay out to any virologist who provides proof of the existence of the Covid-19 "sars-cov-2" virus.
It turns out that on 10/17/2022 this challenge was finally accepted for the first time by Prof. Ulrike Kemmerer, who stated that she was ready to provide the scientific proof of the existence of this virus.
Result: Both Professor Kemmerer and her supporter, a molecular biologist "Franky", were unable to provide any scientific proof of the existence of the sars-cov-2 virus.
While "Franky" said in his telegram group that he "doesn't have time for this,” Professor Kemmerer ended up being completely silent and did not provide a single publication, even when she was asked to do so. She also rejected any attempt at conversation to discuss the topic. 😅
Conclusion: neither during the measles virus trial nor now during Covid-19 have virologists been able to provide evidence of the existence of the viruses that acording to them cause these diseases.
👉 Measles virus court case. (My separate video explaining this court case and all the publications that were provided by the party trying to prove the existence of the measles virus will be released soon).
t.me
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
95. Louis Pasteur was a fraud. 👇👇👇 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1037133/
The private science of Louis Pasteur
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
96. Gatekeepers of the virus lie. 18 minute video:👇 https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Reiner-Fuellmich's-'Coronaviruses':8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people who have been asserting the existence of Salescorp 2 are facing pressure to justify their position. Those of us who have been researching and exposing the fraud of virology have been pointing out since 2020 that there is no virus behind COVID-19. Now, as more people wake up to this fraud, we are seeing backtracking and distractions. Rhinophthalmic recently claimed that while SARS CoV 2 doesn't exist, other coronaviruses do. However, there are problems with this claim. The main issue is that there is no scientific evidence for any virus, not just SARS CoV 2.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many people, including various freedom leaders who have been assuming or asserting that Salescorp 2 exists, are coming under increasing pressure to justify their position. Those of us that have been pointing out since 2020 that the foundational and most important fraud of COVID nineteen is that there is no virus, have spent years researching and exposing the virus hypothesis. Now we are seeing all sorts of backtracking and side stepping from those just waking up to the fraud of virology, whether it's talk of replication, incompetence, infectious clones, naked RNA or other smoke and mirrors, they appear to be distracting from the elephant in the room. For it's not just SARS CoV 2 that does not exist as a virus, but the fact that there is no scientific evidence for any virus. So let's have a look at some problems with Rhinophthalmic's recently published claim that while SARS CoV 2 does not exist, other coronaviruses do.
Reiner Fuellmich's 'Coronaviruses'
Reiner Fuellmich's 'Coronaviruses'
odysee.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
97. The court couldn't prove the virus existed. 👇👇👇 https://odysee.com/@katie.su:7/thecourtcaseagainstvirology:0
The court case against virology
🎥⭐️ Dear friends, here is the recording of my very interesting conversation with Marvin Haberland. Marvin is an engineer and he comes from Germany. As a result of a tragedy in his family, he decided t...
odysee.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
98. The UK's MHRA confesses that the Pfizer 'vaccine' mHRA element is a computer generated genome sequence. 👇👇 https://hive.blog/worldnews/@francesleader/email-exchange-with-uk-mhra-exposing-the-genomic-sequence-of-sarscov2
EMAIL EXCHANGE WITH UK MHRA - Exposing the genomic sequence of SARSCov2 — Hive
When I read the Wuhan study in Feb 2020 I was mortified by the monkey kidney & foetal cell-lines which were used as a "culture" before rt-PCR amplification. Isolation was never… by francesleader
hive.blog
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
100. Jay Couey admits no-virus people are right about fake "virus isolation", fake "sequencing" and no SARS-COV-2, from a man who acts as science advisor to RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense, Jay Couey. https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/jay-couey-admits-no-virus-people?r=yz29c&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Jay Couey admits no-virus people are right about fake "virus isolation", fake "sequencing" and no SARS-COV-2
yet clings to 4 imaginary endemic "coronaviruses"
christinemasseyfois.substack.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
101. Also see links in the description below the video. https://rumble.com/v2mpnba-dr-stefan-lanka-measles-virus-on-trial-no-proof-it-exists.html
DR STEFAN LANKA MEASLES VIRUS ON TRIAL - NO PROOF IT EXISTS
A short interview with Dr Stefan Lanka after he won in the Higher Regional Court in Stuttgart on February 16, 2016 regarding the lack of scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus. Ref
rumble.com
@TrevorJukes1 - TeeJay
102. Germ theory is a hoax part 1:👇 https://ideasdailynet.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/germ-theory-is-a-hoax/ Germ theory is a hoax part 2:👇 https://ideasdailynet.wordpress.com/2022/10/24/germ-theory-is-a-hoax-part-ii/
GERM THEORY IS A HOAX
Always remember that it is easier to fool people than to persuade them they have been fooled.It requires a courageous person to humble themselves in front of the Truth and admit they not only were wrong but fell into a trap. If this post helps even one person end their fear of themselves, nature and…
ideasdailynet.wordpress.com
GERM THEORY IS A HOAX PART II
IF you missed part 1 check it out:https://ideasdaily.net/2022/09/04/germ-theory-is-a-hoax/ Two main topics discussed: A general overview of the controversy. Do viruses really exist and other related questions. Antibodies. How they are in fact useless at stopping disease and are used to coerce people / scare people into accepting quackccines. It is important to note that many…
ideasdailynet.wordpress.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The gender identity movement has a troubling history. Alfred Kinsey's report relied on dodgy evidence, including from a notorious paedophile. John Money championed sex change surgery for children, including a boy whose penis was accidentally burned off. Money was discredited after the boy committed suicide. LGBTQ organizations and the media have promoted extreme versions of LGBTQ orthodoxy, leading to confusion among children. Trans activists are in conflict with lesbians and gays, and some LGBTQ activists embrace medical procedures as a fetish. The public needs to understand the dangerous nature of these demands.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
1./ Gender Identity Nuts How did we end up with rapists in women's prisons? Let's start with Alfred Kinsey who set out to overturn views of sex in 1948. He'd a fetish for harming his penis. His Report had a problem too, as this show revealed. The P Word. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1y48zh
Series 6 Ep 11-Kinsey's Paedophiles - video Dailymotion
Series 6 Ep 11-Kinsey's Paedophiles
dailymotion.com
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
2./ Kinsey's Report relied on dodgy evidence not least from a notorious paedophile who "researched" so-called "infant orgasm". Here's one of Kinsey's disgusting colleagues defending the fact the paedophile had sex with kids. Kinsey's work inspired sex researchers. But...
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man with many contacts was well-liked by children and mothers, never facing any charges or arrests. However, there were two instances where a young child, possibly a girl, agreed to sexual contact but experienced pain due to their young age and small genitalia compared to the man's large genitalia. This created a problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, here's this man with hundreds of contacts. There's never a charge against him. He was never arrested for anything. All the children thought he was wonderful. All the mothers thought he was wonderful.
There are 2 that I suppose, lest you get contradicted. There are 2 instances in which a young boy or girl a girl, I guess it was. I don't remember. They didn't complain. They agreed to the sexual contact, but then they found it very painful and yelled out when it actually took place.
This was because they were very young and had small genitalia, and Rain was a grown man with enormous genital. And there was a thick problem.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
3./ It left a legacy of failure to treat child safeguarding seriously. In 1955 John Money theorised that children could have an inner gender identity that did not match their physical sex. He championed 'sex change surgery' including for a 13 year old... 'Brenda' Reimer. But...
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
4./ 'Brenda' was a boy whose penis was accidentally burned off as a baby. Money told his parents to raise him as a girl. He even used a transsexual to try to convince the boy to have a neo-vagina created. The boy refused. At the end Anne Fausto-Sterling defends Money's attempt.👇
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1978, when Brenda was almost 13, Dr. Mone tried to convince her to have a vaginal surgery. He brought in a transsexual to show Brenda someone who had willingly undergone the operation, hoping it would persuade her. Some experts believe this was a reasonable approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By 1978, the year of the proposed surgery, when she was almost 13, doctor Mone made one last attempt to persuade Brenda to have a vagina constructed. The psychologist enlisted the help of a transsexual. He thought that when Brenda saw someone who had voluntarily submitted to a genital operation. She would be willing to have surgery too. Some experts think that this was a reasonable course of action.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
5./ In 1993, Fausto-Sterling had championed the notion there weren't just two sexes but a spectrum. She later claimed the proposed number of 5 sexes was satire but the spectrum entered the mainstream and is now defended by some scientists who really should know better. 👇
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
6./ Fausto-Sterling's work relied heavily on John Money's but he promptly wrote to the NY Times to slam it as factually inaccurate. His work was anyway deeply troubling. He argued sexual relationships between adults and children could be mutually beneficial. But..
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
7./ Money was discredited after he cited 'Brenda' Reimer as a huge success and proof that sex was malleable. In fact it was a huge disaster. 'Brenda' - as David- later committed suicide after denouncing the perverse experiments Money ran on him and his naked twin brother.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker asks how to differentiate between boys and girls. They mention that boys have short hair, but what if both individuals have short hair? The speaker suggests another way to determine gender is by removing their clothes. They also mention being asked explicit and sexual questions that made them uncomfortable, comparing it to how they would feel talking that way to their own child.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I've got a good question for you. What? How do you tell the difference between a boy and a girl? Well, I've been a lifelong hair, and a boy has shown hair. What if I have shown hair and you have shown hair?
Well, I I am addressing you in a sense. Yes. There would be a way, but there is another way. What? Take their clothes off.
The type of questions that we were asked were sexual in nature. So the point where it'd make me blush, If I would think of talking that way to my to my son, I'd be very embarrassed. It is very explicit with the sexual parts.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
8./ By the time he was discredited in 1997 the gender identity movement Money inspired was exploding. In '92, Kate Bornstein's book 'Gender Outlaw' popularised the notion trans was progressive. This despite the fact Bornstein spent 12 years in the senior ranks of Scientology.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kate Bornstein, a prominent figure in gender discourse, gained recognition with her book Gender Outlaw in 1992, which challenged the gender binary. Her background includes serving as a high-ranking officer in the Scientology church. In 2015, she joined the cast of Caitlyn Jenner's docuseries I am Kate, expanding her reach to a wider American audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kate Bornstein is one of the most important figures in contemporary gender discourse. She rose to underground infamy with the 1992 publication of her book Gender Outlaw, an iconic manifesto that deconstructed the gender binary. Bornstein's history is as full and complex as her ideas about identity. Before she became a clear icon, she was a high ranking officer in the Scientology church. In 2015, she became a cast member of Caitlyn Jenner's docuseries I am Kate, bringing her work to a broader American audience.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
9./ It wasn't long before the idea of identifying as something you're not began to appeal to a ...wider spectrum. Stefoknee Wolscht, a Canadian trans activist, and ex jail bird, argued 'she' was really a 6 year old girl and campaigned to be allowed to use the little girls' room.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to Stephanie's King Time, where I embrace the little girl experiences I was denied.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why hello. Welcome to Stephanie's King Time. In my mind, I'm a girl I was never allowed to be a little girl. So I'm filling that tank of little girl experiences.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
10./ If any of this seemed untenable or suspect it soon became difficult to oppose it. LGBTQ+ organisations like Stonewall encouraged institutions and employers to enforce the new ideology. Staff activists underlined the message. Here's taxpayers money being wasted at the @DWP
Video Transcript AI Summary
A trans man is someone who was assigned female at birth, while cisgender or cis refers to those who identify with the gender they were assigned at birth. Transitioning can be challenging due to concerns about societal acceptance and potential loss of relationships or employment. It's important to use correct pronouns, such as she/her, he/him, or they/them, to respect individuals' gender identities. Including pronouns in email signatures can create a more inclusive environment. Misunderstandings and misjudgments about trans people can have serious consequences, as their rights and lives are at stake. Trans people exist as a reality, not an opinion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A trans man is a man who was assigned female at birth.
Speaker 1: Cisgender or cis is a term for anyone who does identify with the gender they were assigned at birth. It is not an insult. Everyone has a gender identity. Being trans is when your sense of your own gender is different to the gender you were given at birth.
Speaker 0: Whether you're trans or not is called your trans status. Becomes in many shapes and forms. It's very personal. It's very personal.
Speaker 1: There are many barriers to transitioning including worrying how others will treat you, such as losing family, friends, or your job. My family don't accept me. The word trans is an adjective, it's not a noun. So it's a trans woman not a trans. My pronouns are she and her.
Some people's pronouns are he and him, but there are also they and them. They and them does not necessarily have to be plural, it can also be a singular.
Speaker 0: Trans people know when someone is doing it inadvertently And when someone is doing it on purpose, just make sure you're in the 1st group. You don't have to be trans put the pronouns in your email. It's very effortless and it just helps everyone really creating a more welcoming environment. So be careful not to get misinformed because had like forming a wrong opinion of trans people can mean that trans people can lose, their hardly fought and acquired rights. And we are talking about lives, we're talking about people who are human.
And it's not okay to make their existence an opinion because trans people exist, they are not an opinion, they are they are a reality, we are real.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
11./ The media got in on the act too, churning out propaganda. Here's a snippet from the BBC's infamous schools educational video telling 11 year olds that there are over 100 different genders. The video was only withdrawn after 2 years of protest by the likes of @ALLIANCELGB
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are over 100 gender identities, apart from male and female. Some individuals may identify as two different genders or as bigender. Others may describe themselves as gender queer, not wanting to be associated with any specific gender.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Different gender identities. That's a really, really exciting question to ask. Do you know there are so many gender identities? So we know we've got male and female but there are over 100 if not more gender identities now? So we know that some people might feel like they're 2 different genders, some people might think they're bigender, And then you've got some people who might call themselves gender queer.
They're just like, I don't really want to be anything in particular. I'm just going to be me.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
12./ Within schools a legion of bizarre organisations fanned out to inculcate ever more extreme versions of LGBTQ+ orthodoxy. 'Educate and Celebrate' for example were paid taxpayers' money to 'smash heteronormativity in primary schools". Which isn't scary at all..
Video Transcript AI Summary
We aim to break down societal norms and promote acceptance of all identities, especially for our children. Our teaching methods focus on intersectionality and normalizing LGBTQ+ experiences. We strive to incorporate diversity into every lesson, making it a regular part of our school environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And really, the bottom line is completely smashed. Petronormativity. That's what we want to do so our kids can grow and be who they are. We totally encourage intersectional ways of teaching, lots of pedagogies around usualising, so making lgbt plus and everyday occurrence within the school. In our school, every lesson is somehow linked to diversity.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
13./ What's the result of this baloney on kids? Some "parents" are raising kids without any notion of gender (I think they actually mean sex). I wonder if lawyers across the US are drawing up timetables for when certain kids reach adulthood ....and can sue.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Polyamorous parents allow their children to choose their gender. Their oldest child, Hazel, identifies as nonbinary. They explain that the pronouns "she" and "he" didn't feel right, so they embraced the term nonbinary. Despite this, Hazel prefers to present themselves in a more feminine manner.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These polyamorous parents let their children choose their gender. And for their oldest child, Hazel, that's neither male nor female.
Speaker 1: Please tell us how and why you decided to come out as nonbinary. Because the pronouns she and he did not fit. Non binary was what I turned to, though I do choose to act and look, more feminine. Can I go down, mom?
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
14./ If kids aren't sent to surgeons they may be able to pull their lives together. Here's Jazz Jenning's very caring surgeon explaining because of puberty blockers Jazz's genitals never developed. Jazz describes "her" vagina as a 'frankenvagina'. John Money would surely approve.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A breakthrough in surgery is the ability to harvest the peritoneal lining. Jazz, a medical case, presents a challenge as her puberty was effectively blocked, preventing normal genital growth. This makes it difficult for surgeons to use a conventional approach. They are using the peritoneum tissue to create what can be described as a patchwork or Franken vagina.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really doing right now as a breakthrough in terms of the surgery and being able to harvest this peritoneal lining. Jazz, as a medical case, is really a conundrum because her puberty was blocked so well that she didn't get growth of her genitals in a way that allows us as a surgeon to use a conventional approach. Thanks, please. It looks good. They're using the tissue I have, the peritoneum.
I say it's going to be like a patchwork vagina, a Franken vagina.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
15./ Here's that surgeon telling @MattWalshBlog there's no connection between wanting to chop off genitals and chop off limbs. This is strange because the person who first studied wannabe amputees and compared it to sex change surgery was gender identity's pioneer: John Money.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a community called trans abled where people who are physically able-bodied identify as disabled. For example, a man with two arms may feel like he should have only one. This has nothing to do with gender identity but rather someone's self-identity. It is considered a mental diagnosis called aptaminophenia, where someone is fascinated by having a missing limb or part of a limb. Some may find this idea strange or kooky.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever heard of people in the trans abled community? These are people who are physically able-bodied but feel like they should be disabled or identify as such. For example, a man who has 2 arms, but feels like he should have 1. If a if a man in this kind of marginalized community was went to the doctor and said I want to have Markov. Do you think that
Speaker 1: That doesn't have anything to do with gender identity. Well, it's, someone's Someone's
Speaker 0: self identity, how someone
Speaker 1: identifies it? That's someone who has a, And I'll accept it as a mental diagnosis, a psychiatric condition. I don't even pretend to know what aptaminophenia is all about. But somehow it's the idea that you're fascinated or charmed by having a limb or part of a limb missing. Okay.
I would say that's, pardon my non medical language. Kooky.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
16./ Marcia Bowers describes wanting to chop your leg off as 'kooky' but sex change surgery is apparently never kooky. Yet transition late in life often leaves an unconvincing appearance. This is why activists began to promote puberty blockers as a solution. But...
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker talks about a stage where they noticed changes in their body. They mention that some people might perceive them as a 9 or 10-year-old going through a tomboy phase.
Full Transcript
And just just at the stage where I could see the body changing and, and just I think some people might, you know, look at Kai and go, oh, he's 9 or 10 and think, oh, you know, the tomboy phase or this
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
17./ This brings trans activists into direct conflict with lesbians and gays who can see no reliable way to separate so-called "trans kids" from other gender non conforming kids. Our suspicion deepens when trans activists argue homosexuality will just have to disappear.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
18./ Nor does it help that some LGBTQ+ activists embrace medical procedures as some sort of sexual fetish. Here's a bloke explaining he wants to become a 'null' or eunuch. This raises the prospect of young LGB people being at risk from the promotion of creepy body modification.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I prefer male pronouns and presenting as male. I want to either have no genitalia through nullification surgery or have female genitalia. Even if I don't have testicles, I would still take testosterone. My husband and I haven't decided on surgery, but I have started tucking and binding my genitals, which has been life-changing for me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm comfortable with male pronouns. I present as male. I would prefer to either not have male genitalia either by having no genitalia at all, like through a surgery, they call it nullification, a or having a female genitalia. And I would still take testosterone even though that I didn't have testicles anymore. Wow.
But that's for me and that's my experience, but there are probably, you know, lots of people people who have very different experiences. My husband and I hadn't really decided if a surgery thing is gonna be a route that we would go. What we did decide on is I would start to tuck and bind my genitals. It has been, like, life changing for me.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
19./ In 2022 the leading trans health care organisation @wpath raised 'eunuch' to the status of a gender identity. Sadiq Khan the @MayorofLondon has not clarified whether he still argues that "all gender identities are valid". Should eunuchs be celebrated in London's schools?
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
20./ Promoting eunuchs as a valid and desirable identity for boys is perhaps the only idea quite as mad as rapists being put in women's prisons. Here's @lisanandy a Labour front bencher defending putting both rapists and paedophiles in the women's estate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUon9j1zJ_E
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
21./ Nandy is Shadow Secretary for Levelling Up. The gay community has got used to another sort of levelling up, where our movement is taken over by straight people who want to seem edgy. Here's Pips Bunce, celebrated as an LGBT+ leader, thanking his/..."her"... wife.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
22./ Luckily, gender ideology is so daft when the public takes notice they're amazed it's taken seriously. Here's the Tate using taxpayers' money to celebrate "Queer" art. Listen to the buffoonery as they try to define a woman artist of the 20s as 'queer' cos ...she wore a suit.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Form, something as basic as shape, has been assigned gender. Straight lines are considered masculine, while curves are seen as feminine. This gendering of form has erased the contributions of a remarkable woman from history. Her innovations and creativity in the art form were overshadowed and credited to others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing as fundamental and basic as form has been gendered. Like, straight lines being masculine and curves being feminine. That's not necessarily a Was erased from history and almost like all the innovations and creativity that she brought to the art form were basically written into other people's fabric
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
23./ Let's hope gender identity's powerful adherents continue to loudly proclaim their incoherent demands. The more these activists state clearly what they really want the more the public will understand that they and their demands are as dangerously nuts as it's possible to be.
@TwisterFilm - Malcolm Clark
@threadreaderapp please unroll
reSee.it AI Summary
The American medical establishment's use of protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn comparisons to the National Socialists' Aktion T4 program, which killed 300,000 disabled people. The protocols incentivize doctors to follow a one-size-fits-all approach, with legal immunity from liability. Patients are often restrained, given lethal drug combinations, and denied life-saving treatments. Families have filed complaints, but hospitals fight to deny them the right to try alternative medicines. The isolation, dangerous treatments, and legal immunity add up to a design to harm and profit.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Mega Thread: American T4 - Protocols That Kill
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“We were just following protocols” That is the phrase that we are going to be hearing a lot of in the future. It’s reminiscent of what the German doctors said during the Nuremberg trials. This phrase will be used un-ironically by the majority of our medical establishment when…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is an inevitability, a crime of this scale cannot be swept under the rug, especially in that age of instant communication. Much like the National Socialists, there will be attempts at denials, gaslighting and accusations but they will be to no avail. Too many families exist…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The National Socialists had euthanasia initiative called the Aktion T4 Program. It was a precursor to their final solution that sought the extermination of the Jewish people. This little known program was responsible for the deaths of 300,000 disabled people. The first victims…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
From the Documentary “Caring Corrupted - The Killing Nurses of The Third Reich”
Video Transcript AI Summary
In post-World War 1 Germany, Hitler's policies were implemented due to the economic situation and the Versailles Treaty. The nurses in the Nazi era became involved in the killing of children and later adults. Propaganda promoted the idea of eliminating those deemed "life unworthy of life." The nurses played a role in administering lethal drug overdoses, exposing children to hypothermia, and withholding food to cause starvation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The economic situation in Germany following World War 1 and the Versailles Treaty led to the wholesale implementation of Hitler's policies. They started killing children first and then a bit later on started killing adults. It's not prizing that the nurses in the in the Nazi era got caught up in all this. The propaganda was everywhere about killing people who were considered life unworthy of life, useless feeders was the term they used. The nurses were the ones who, held the children while they were being killed.
They gave them the overdoses of drugs. They were the ones who put them out on the verandas to die of hypothermia. The nurses were the ones who helped withheld the feeding so the children would die of starvation.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This program was started with a letter sent to Hitler in 1939. A loyalist had inquired directly to Hitler to ask if he could euthanize his own son who was born with blind, subject to convulsion and exhibited mental disabilities. The letter intrigued Hitler and he sent his own…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A photograph of Hitler’s physician Karl Brandt. Brandt confirmed the situation to Hitler and the order was given to kill the boy with a lethal injection. The cause of death on his birth certificate read, “heart weakness”.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This death was the basis for Aktion T4 and it was set in motion September 1st, 1939. This is the authorization letter.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The program established the creation of the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses. Bureaucratic-speak for a death panel. Every baby born was to be inspected by an official with a report issued that stated the physical condition. If…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is a photo of Richard Jenne, an unfortunate victim of the sadistic program.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The book Death and Deliverance: 'Euthanasia' in Germany, C.1900 to 1945, detailed an account of the abject horrors inflicted on innocent children.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is one of the most chilling quotes I’ve read in a long time. “As he displayed the child around like a dead hare, he pointed out, with a knowing look and a cynical grin, “This one will last another two or three day.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I write this brief background so you, the reader can really get a sense of the evil. These are horrors that if told to us without documentary proof, most of us would never accept as true and yet they are true. So if doctors and nurses could be so cruel and inhumane once in…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Amazing Grace This is Grace Schara, a 19 year young woman who many believe was killed due to misconduct of the medical staff at the hospital she was admitted to after a positive COVID diagnosis.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Grace, who had Down syndrome was a high functioning, rambunctious young lady, loved by everyone she encountered for her big smile and even bigger heart. Sadly, Grace is one of many lives ended due to a set of guidelines put in place by the CDC that incentivize protocols via…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Not only that, if Doctors follow the recommendations, the are immune from liability. The following is an excerpt provided by the Congressional Research Service that explain how it works.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“To encourage the expeditious development and deployment of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to limit legal liability for losses…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Key word there: Willful This one word affords Doctors who follow protocols the plausible deniability they need to be exonerated of wrong doing. Why would a doctor need any kind of immunity from liability if their first priority was truly caring for the patient and to do no harm?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Let’s read part of the Hippocratic Oath all of these doctors swore upon when receiving their medical license. “I swear that, according to my ability and judgement, I will keep this Oath and this contract: “To hold him who taught me this art equally dear to me as my parents, to…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The oath continues further but you get the idea. DO NO HARM or INJUSTICE. After Grace’s death, her family filed a complaint to the hospital administrators. The key points are provided below you can understand the treatment she was subjected to.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The Complaint Reads: 1.The hospital staff put Grace in restraints, without permission and without attempting alternatives, when she wanted to get out of bed to use the bathroom her last morning. Jessica (Grace’s Sister) overheard them say, "the family isn’t going to like this."…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A timeline of Grace’s Last Day. Look at the amount of drugs they gave her. These drugs in combination are lethal, especially if the way they are administered and the protocols related to care are ignored.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
To really understand what occurred listen to this Nurse Practitioner who breaks it all down.
Video Transcript AI Summary
After Grace's father left the hospital, doctors increased the drugs given to Grace without anyone advocating for her. Nurse practitioner Sue reviewed Grace's medical records and explained the drugs used. Cresodex, an anesthesia medication, should only be used for sedation or anesthesia for up to 24 hours, but it was used for much longer. Lorazepam, used for anxiety or seizures, was also given. The combination of these drugs, along with morphine, suppressed Grace's breathing and heart function. It is clear that the prolonged and cumulative use of these drugs put Grace at high risk for respiratory depression and cardiac arrest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After Grace's father was removed from the hospital, doctors began increasing the amount of drugs they were giving to Grace while no one was there to advocate for her. 44 hours passed as the family worked with their attorneys to have Grace's sister, Jess, be her new advocate while in the hospital. We spoke with a nurse practitioner named Sue, who wishes to remain anonymous. She reviewed Grace's medical records, and here, she breaks down the drug stack that was given to Grace leading up to her death.
Speaker 1: So the first one that they were giving is the one called Cresodex, and that's the one that they use for anesthesia. The indications
Speaker 0: to use that medication is either
Speaker 1: if they're trying to sedate somebody, patient is either if they're trying to sedate somebody for in an intensive care setting, like I mentioned, somebody that would be on a ventilator, for example, or if they're trying to put them under anesthesia for a procedure or a surgery. And so, you know, that's Appropriate use. If somebody's being sedated just because they're in a bed and they're using it as a chemical restraint, You know, ethically, that's already questionable. However, if they chose to use it and they did, it's Very clear on the package insert, which is how, you know, the the directions we are to follow as health Care providers as to how to administer medication, it's very clear that that medication is not to be used for more than 24 hours continuously. And as you see with Prasodex, they were using it for much longer than 24 hours.
On 13th, which was Grace's last day, They started at that 0.7 and then started edging it up and went to 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, and that's where it ended. So they really did bump up that dose and that's anesthetic. So then when we look at that last day, They also added lorazepam, which is the Ativan, which is typically used for anxiety, but can be used For prolonged seizures, for example, it can be a pre anesthetic, so you don't remember what was during a procedure. They gave a dose of that at 11:25 in the morning, And they gave it IV 0.5, IV push. Then they gave a dose at 546 in the evening, And then that was 0.5, and then they gave another dose of 0.5 at five 49, 3 minutes later.
That was ordered to be given at 0.5 milligrams as needed every 6 hours. So that 2nd dose 3 minutes later was not even following orders, and they wrote a note in there that They overrode that order because her respiratory rate was 55, and they They overrode that order because of the work of breathing that she was having. But if we go back to the looking at the Presidex, Precovax is an anesthetic. It decreases your ability to breathe. It decreases the ability to get Oxygen into the lungs, so the natural outcome of being on a sedative is you're going to breathe faster and work harder to breathe.
So now they're giving Lorazepam to overcome what's being done by the president. And then, You know, the kind of the final push there was they gave the 2 milligrams of morphine IV push at 6 15 PM. So that was less than a half an hour after the second dose of Pam, all of those work in combination with each other to suppress your ability to breathe In a person that was in there for acute respiratory illness, and they work to Suppress the ability of the heart to pump. So when these are used in combination like that, they have a cumulative effect, and you're supposed To have something by the bedside to reverse that action if someone would have their heart start to stop or their respirations There are 2 c's. In my professional opinion, nobody could look at that chart and see something different.
We all understand that these things are cumulative. We all stand that these things are cumulative. We all understand that you're supposed to lower doses. We all understand that prolonged use of this In short, you know, periods of time of use of this would be cumulative, would be at High risk for respiratory depression and cardiac arrest.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Grace was issued a Do Not Resuscitate order without the consent of her parents and as you read, she was restrained against her will for wanting to use the restroom. The nurses and doctors had made a decision, a decision that is not theirs to make. That Grace was not going to…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
To add insult to injury the state of Wisconsin sent a letter to the family letting them know how sorry they were for their loss and that they were eligible for a $9000 funeral expense reimbursement through FEMA since Grace was considered a COVID death. Her mother was quoted as…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
How many families were essentially paid off with this FEMA Funeral Fund? I confirmed the FEMA funeral expense amount here, there is up to $35K available to families.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is a flyer explaining the program. https://www.fema.gov/disaster/coronavirus/economic/funeral-assistance/faq
Funeral Assistance FAQ
Frequently asked questions for Coronavirus 19 or COVID funeral assistance through FEMA.
fema.gov
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This document is a breakdown of the average hospital payment received per covid-19 hospitalizations, with severity distribution. It is estimated that a patient who goes through the approved protocols and ends up dying after being put on a ventilator, it worth around $100K in…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Furor Erupts: Billions Going To Hospitals Based On Medicare Billings, Not COVID-19
In the first round of emergency relief, some states will get more than $300,000 per COVID-19 patient, while hard-hit New York gets just $12,000 per patient.
kffhealthnews.org
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here are two more cases of hospital malfeasance, just to establish the pattern. Thousands more match this same pattern. Although I am sure all of those involved with deny it. Valerie
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This 58 year old mother presented to the hospital with difficulty breathing. Upon running some tests it was determined that she has an acute kidney issue. Add this to the fact that she also had COPD. Once admitted, the Dr. Immediately recommended Remdesivir, despite the known…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
She even called 911 but the hospital deemed her unruly and sedated her. Her son got a lawyer involved to exercise his “right to try” ivermectin and high dose vitamins but they denied the request. She was malnourished at this point but then decided to put her on a ventilator and…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Diona
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Diona was very anxious about getting covid from all the media reports and one day wasn’t feeling well. She was having typical flu like symptoms but insisted on going to the hospital. There she didn’t test positive and was sent home with some steroids. A couple days later she…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
At the hospital she tested positive. She was put on oxygen and started an antibiotic but then they were abruptly stopped in favor of you guessed it, Remdesivir. At this point she wasn’t receiving proper nutrition and her oxygen levels began to fall. Her son discovered that she…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
He then demanded a list of medications she was on because he had a bad feeling she was deteriorating quickly. What he learned shocked him. The attending nurse said in addition to Remdesivir and morphine she was also on Baricintinib, Xanax, Klonopin, Ativan, and Precedex. All of…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Notice a pattern? Remdesivir is administered, oxygen levels go down, oxygen is started along with and arthritis medication like Baricintinib that can actually significantly increase infections and cause heart failure which I’ll address shortly. The condition worsens until the…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
All the while being malnourished and given little fluids or vitamins, as well as drugs like morphine that further hinders breathing. Patients are forced to go through this alone with little human contact and eventually succumb to the toxic mixture of chemicals and inhumane…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is the treatment protocol for hospitalization giving by the CDC. http://1.No corticosteroids unless oxygen is needed. 2.If deemed “high risk”, immediately put on poisonous Remdesivir, which cost $3120 per patient. 3.If conventional http://5.At… http://1.No http://5.At…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is a screenshot from the guidelines showing the progression.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The treatment guidelines even mentions the fact that these combinations of drugs can be harmful. “The benefits outweigh the potential risks.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here is a link to the nearly 500 page document issued for treatment guidelines if you’d like to read it yourself: https://files.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/guidelines/covid19treatmentguidelines.pdf
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Another screenshot showing the dangers of Baricintinib. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out this with remdesivir which is known to cause renal failure and a immunosuppressant steroid along with arthritis medication that increases infections and your risk of heart failure,…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
There is even a warning that you run the risk of developing lymphoma or life threatening heart problems.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
All of this taken together brings this to an uncomfortable conclusion. The isolation, the strict protocols of dangerous treatments, the money attached to all of this and the legal immunity add up to a design to harm and profit from it.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
These stories of people I’ve provided are just a drop in the bucket, thousands of families have experienced similar fates. Hospitals fighting tooth and nail to not allow the “right to try” medicines, even ignoring court orders, and calling the police on concerned family members.…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This didn’t even touch on the horrors that occurred in nursing home here and abroad. The use of Midazolam on the elderly, euthanizing aka killing them and the issuance of DNR orders without consent as if these people are animals who just needed to be culled. It’s inconceivable…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I know many reading this will be offended by that conclusion, especially the doctors and nurses who followed these protocols, and to them I ask, why are you just following one size fits all protocols for human beings? Can you honestly say, you’ve kept your oath?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Is someone’s life worth you keeping your job? Are you that spineless and arrogant that you can’t stand up to these god forsaken administrators and government agencies? Before 2020 any time what happened in Germany was discussed, people would matter of factly say “that could never…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Well, it has and if you were a part of these ungodly protocols, you helped it happen again. It was the Doctors and Nurses who were first to sign on to the genocide in Germany, never forget that fact. These totalitarian murderous protocols and the money attached need to be…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“I was just following protocols” isn’t going to be an acceptable excuse.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the Nuremberg courtroom, the trial of 23 Nazi doctors accused of various crimes begins. Karl Brandt, Hitler's personal physician and a high-ranking SS officer, is the main defendant. Another important figure is Siegfried, a former medical chief in the German army. The only female defendant was a physician at Ravensbruck concentration camp. Despite their pleas of not guilty, the future of these accused individuals will be determined by time and evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Taking their places in the famous Nuremberg courtroom, judges of the allied military tribunal begin the trial of minor war criminals. In the dark once occupied by their leaders are 23 nazi doctors accused of many crimes in hospitals, concentration camps and research centers. Number one defendant is Karl Brandt, formerly Hitler's personal position and a general in the Waffen SS. Next in importance is Siegfried a former medical chief of the Wehrmacht. The only woman defendant was a physician in the camp at Ravensbruck.
All the accused pleaded not guilty, but time and evidence alone will decide their future.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
@Trinityaudiobot
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you have found this thread informative please consider giving me a follow so won’t miss any future ones. Like these 👇 https://t.co/DPSWDdMVt9
reSee.it AI Summary
There are evil people in this world who will do anything for power and control. AIDS was man-made using gain of function capabilities. They have been creating viruses for decades and won't stop until we make them stop. Our betters may have a cure they're not sharing. We need to make our voices heard.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
I just spent an hour or so listening to a video from 1988 about the origins of AIDS and all I could do was shake my head in disgust. Disgust that there are evil people in this world who will do anything and everything for power and control. Then I think, these people were actually brilliant because they were able to distract millions of people so that they wouldn’t have time to keep an eye on the folks who you think will do you no harm. All I can say is that while we have been living our lives, they have been plotting our demise.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
I’ll be adding 6 videos to this thread but you should read through this one first.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
What makes a virus eradicable? Applied to covid, there was absolutely no chance for “zero” covid and the lockdowns were for nothing because the virus was always going to be there.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the eradicability of viruses, focusing on the case of AIDS. They mention four criteria for eradicability: the absence of an animal reservoir, the virus not persisting in infected humans for years, the absence of multiple serological types, and the ability to obtain the necessary social cooperation. The speaker argues that AIDS violates all four criteria, suggesting that it will remain a long-term problem along with related viruses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now if you address the question of eradicability of a virus, in other words, what makes a virus eroticable? Is it possible to get this virus out of humans once it's running there? In 1970, Frank Fenner wrote an article about the eradication of smallpox. It's published in the progress of medical virology. Frank Fenner's a, who was at the time at the Centre For Resource Environmental Studies, the Australian National The university in Canberra.
He's a world renowned virologist, and he wrote the following. He said, under prerequisites for eradicability? In other words, what is required to get the disease out of humans? Quote, One can virtually rule out the possibility of worldwide eradication of an infectious disease if any any of the following criteria obtained? One, the agent grows in wild animals or birds, so it has an animal reservoir.
Now if you believe that AIDS came from monkeys, which I don't, or if you believe it came from sheep or cattle, which I do, either one, there's an obvious animal reservoir. So that would preclude eradocability. 2, the agent persists in the infected human being for years and their recrudescences. So the AIDS virus existing over 14 years or longer and having a slow viral progression, obviously, makes number 2, second factor for noneradicability. 3, the disease has multiple serological types.
In other words, there are many variants to the AIDS virus. We have already discussed that and shown there are approximately 9,000 of the 4th different AIDS virus possible, which makes third Criteria for eradicability voided. And 4, the necessary degree of social cooperation cannot be obtained, quote, as with the human venereal diseases? In other words, if the disease is a sexually transmissible disease or a venereal disease, Then you cannot eradicate it from humans once it's running because you cannot obtain the degree of social cooperation necessary for eradication. So not only does AIDS violate one of these 4 criteria, it violates all 4.
So once we have AIDS running in humans, it appears to be that's gonna be here for a very long period of time along with all of its relatives, h t l v 1, 2, 4, 5, and 1 look alike? So we have a tremendous problem facing us, not just a problem of the AIDS virus alone?
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
AIDS was man made using the “gain of function” capabilities that they had at the time. Listen to what he thinks might be a cure for AIDS and then watch the next video of Dr. Coleman.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses various aspects of the AIDS virus pandemic. They mention that the virus was predicted in 1966 and may have been produced by crossing bovine leukemia virus Envisnavirus. The World Health Organization (WHO) wrote an article in 1972 about creating a t cell destroying virus. The speaker questions the coincidence of the AIDS pandemic in Africa occurring at vaccination centers where smallpox eradication programs were conducted. They debunk myths about AIDS, such as it being a homosexual disease or having a short incubation period. The speaker concludes by suggesting that the cure for AIDS may lie in the development of electromagnetic or electrophysiologic techniques to identify and eliminate the virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In summary then, what have we got here? I've given you today the fact that the virus, I think, the AIDS virus pandemic was not only, present present today, but predicted as far back as 1966 by McFarland Burnett and by Cleminson who said, you better get ready for walking down the street and getting hit with the virus that caused leukemia or something else just as we have. The fact that the virus may have been produced by crossing bovine leukemia virus Envisnavirus to produce bovine Envisnavirus and adapted to grow in humans by growth in human tissue. The fact that the WHO in 1970 2 wrote an article that said, let's make a t cell destroying virus. So they crossed the t trophic virus with the great destroyer of VISTA to make a t cell destroyer.
And then is it just coincidence that the AIDS pandemic in Africa occurs at the same vaccination centers where the smallpox was conducting with where the WHO was conducting its smallpox eradication programs. What are the myths of AIDS? AIDS is a homosexual disease. It's obviously a myth that it's, going to have a very short incubation period, that it came from African green monkeys, that it's gonna die out in heterosexuals, that it's no problem, etcetera, etcetera. All these things, I call the misinformation of AIDS, and I've covered all that.
And then the final is is what can we expect to cure this virus not only, in the near future, but perhaps for all times. And I think that the cure for AIDS will lie in the reconstruction or redevelopment of electromagnetic or electrophysiologic techniques, which will allow for identification and perhaps for for then obliteration of viruses either in blood extracorporeal circulated and treated extracorporeal or actually irradiated as man within a radio wave, carrier wave passing through them and destroying the virus inside the human being.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
What would we do if we ever found out that our betters had a cure that they didn’t share with the general population?
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Now to the videos that could have been taken today. A few things for this video: 1. Substitute green monkeys with bats. 2. Gay people were erroneously demonized and the people who knew better let it happen. 3. Dr. Coleman, and others, have said the exact same thing that the… Show more
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Strecker discusses the origins and transmission of the AIDS epidemic. He challenges the belief that the disease came from African monkeys and suggests it actually started in the 1970s in Africa during a smallpox vaccination program by the World Health Organization. He also questions the idea that AIDS is solely a venereal disease, as it can potentially be transmitted by carriers like mosquitoes. Dr. Strecker highlights that the virus can survive outside the body, contradicting previous assumptions. The government's involvement and the labeling of AIDS as a homosexual disease are also questioned, as the outbreak coincided with a hepatitis B vaccine program. The assumption that homosexuals were responsible for the disease lacks logical validity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Strecker, I have watched and listened to your presentation, frankly, in awe. And it occurs to me that if only a small portion of what you've been saying is true, that we as Americans have been, frankly, led down the Primrose path by those in power who have been giving us information regarding the AIDS epidemic. What you've actually said is that the AIDS epidemic not only did not come from the green African monkey as we've been told. What in fact was, The epidemic itself was started in the '70s in Africa, and coincided almost directly with a smallpox a vaccination program that's sponsored by the World Health Organization. And if that's true, the implications of that, of course, are, are astounding.
You're also asserting that this disease is not a venereal disease, may or may not be transmitted sexually, possibly can be transmitted, outside the body by by carriers such as mosquitoes. The virus itself doesn't correspond to anything we know about venereal diseases. The French have isolated this virus And it can live outside the body. Another thing we're told couldn't be possible. We're hearing so much about condoms today as being a good preventative of this disease, and you've literally shut holes in that theory, all these things are astounding.
Why in the world would our government, the World Health Organization and National Institute of Health lead us down this garden path. What's behind all of this?
Speaker 1: Well, I think the answer the simple answer to that is, of course, first off, if you knew that you'd constructed the virus awe. Had somehow been responsible for his construction or spread, would you tell anybody? I think it's clear that, no, you wouldn't want anybody to That you had anything to do with it. And of course, then the people who are responsible are not going to want anybody to know that they were responsible. So it's, I think it would be naive to suspect that someone would come out and say, Hey, I made AIDS, and Spread it.
I mean, that's
Speaker 0: Yet you read us documents where it was the disease was, predicted that we're, sooner or later, gonna run into an epidemic like this, and then you read a document where it was proposed, why don't we try and do something like this? And then we have the smallpox inoculation program. And correspondingly, in those very same 5 areas, the smallpox, the AIDS epidemic breaks out.
Speaker 1: That's correct.
Speaker 0: And then in America, where everybody is lambasting homosexuals, as this being a homosexual disease, You've told us that there was a hepatitis B vaccine, program.
Speaker 1: Again, the epidemiology of the AIDS outbreak United States, in my opinion, exactly corresponds to the hepatitis b vaccine program. It corresponds not only in the exact age group, These, homosexuals in the same cities in the same time frame, 1978 in New York and then 1980, basically, in Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Speaker 0: So how can our government be telling us that this is a homosexual disease when the disease apparently broke out as a result of this inoculation for a hepatitis B program.
Speaker 1: Because, because in fact, that's what it looked like from the beginning. So, I mean, that is the easy assumption, that it is a homosexual disease because it's growing and running and spreading in homosexuals. But, That has absolutely no logical, validity in concluding that the homosexuals were responsible for the disease.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
For this video, the thread i mention you should read is a good reference for the following reasons. 1. As with covid, little fella Fauci worked on the AIDS pandemic. He didn’t tell the truth then and he certainly isn’t telling the truth now. 2. The WHO started their… Show more
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that there may be a lack of integrity among physicians and scientific researchers investigating the origins of AIDS. They argue that it is not in their interest to always tell the truth and that there are instances where they have lied. They claim that there are many others who believe the virus may have come from a laboratory. The spread of AIDS in countries like Brazil and Haiti is attributed to factors such as the smallpox vaccination campaign in Africa and the hepatitis B vaccine program in America. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of finding a solution to control the virus, as it has the potential to exterminate mankind. The discussion also touches on a biological warfare attack in San Francisco.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In in essence, you're saying that those, many hundreds of not only physicians, but scientific researchers who have, been entrusted with looking into this matter are, in a sense, totally lacking in integrity? Or is that my interpretation of what you're doing?
Speaker 1: Well, I I'm not sure I can say that they're totally Aggie and integrity.
Speaker 0: Or are you saying that it's not too smart?
Speaker 1: No. I'm not saying that either.
Speaker 0: Well, what are you saying?
Speaker 1: I'm saying that it is not in their interest necessarily to always tell you the truth. That is not I mean, there are certain instances here That's
Speaker 2: a lack of injector? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, there are certain instances here where I think it's clear that they've been lying. For instance, to to say that there's only 1 AIDS virus, well, there there's real that's really not right. There's a field effect. There are millions of different AIDS viruses.
Every AIDS virus isolated to date is different. Again, if you made this virus or were responsible For a spread or had something to do with its spread, are you gonna tell anybody? I think the answer is obviously no.
Speaker 0: Well, I I agree with that. I mean, that that assumes though that there, are either a very small number of individuals running the show or that, you're a very extraordinary person. Because there there is no one else saying this.
Speaker 1: Well, that's not correct. There are many other people saying it. In it has been it's been actually, it's been discussed worldwide. It's only been recently that this question has been discussed in this country. Doctor John Seale of the Royal Society of Medicine had said that the virus appeared to be man made in a sense long before we did, but he couldn't exactly construct how that may have occurred.
We sort of gave him maybe the information on how the viruses could have been recombined to produce a new AIDS like virus. Jacob Siegel, an East German biologist who said that the virus was constructed at Fort Detrick in a biological warfare project. Again, if the virus is its own constructing agent and the virus could have arisen in any laboratory at any time, more or less, since the development of human tissue culture, which arose in 1951 with the death of Henrietta Lack, every laboratory in the world is suspect. And of course, that makes all the scientists very nervous because they're gonna they they say, well, I mean, I don't it surely didn't come out of my lab.
Speaker 0: So in essence, you're talking about a, Chernobyl of molecular biology in a sense.
Speaker 1: Exactly correct. Actually, if you look at the predictions in testimony before Congress, the actual predictions was that a Chernobyl accident, or a Three Mile Island accident was predicted by a physicist to be something like 1 times 10 to the minus 18th.
Speaker 2: And
Speaker 0: the chance that it would happen.
Speaker 1: That it would happen. Right. Whereas the chance of a biological accident of this nature was 1 times 10 to the times 14th or basically 10,000 times more likely to occur than either a Chernobyl or Three Mile Island.
Speaker 3: Doctor. Strecker, how can you account for the spread of the AIDS virus in such a monumental amount of cases in countries like Brazil or other parts of Latin America or Haiti.
Speaker 1: Right. Again, I think the Haitian explanation is quite simple. If you look in the, May 11th, Monday, May 11, 1987 article on the front page of the One Times. What's documented there is that at the time of the smallpox vaccination campaign of the World Health Organization in Africa in the mid seventies, 15,000 Haitians were in that program in Africa. They were there working.
So it's easy to see how Haitians may have been contaminated And then move back to Haiti, that could explain the outbreak of AIDS in Haiti.
Speaker 2: Did they participate in the smallpox trial?
Speaker 1: Yes, 15,000. They did? Yes, they did. 15,000 Haitians Well,
Speaker 2: this is incredible. If, in fact, the outbreak of AIDS corresponded with this smallpox vaccination a crime. Situation in the mid-'70s in Africa. Everybody knows about it. Who did it?
They should know the results. If in fact, the Haitians were part of that and then went back to Haiti and of course, you know, did what come naturally and then, you know, Haitians seem to get it. If, in fact, the homosexual outbreak in America is tied into the hepatitis B vaccine a program initiated by was that NIH?
Speaker 1: No. Again, I
Speaker 2: was thinking about somebody.
Speaker 1: It's New York City blood bank.
Speaker 2: Don't these same things occur to the people who who did it? I mean, why are you the only one that's making that's making note of this? It's so obvious.
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one. If it looks like a rose
Speaker 2: and smells like a rose, it's it's it's actually much a right? They've worked to correct situations based on flimsier evidence than this. So, even if they didn't do it intentionally, I think the fact that they're avoiding Dealing with this incredible coincidence is tantamount to criminal act also. Wouldn't you say? I mean,
Speaker 1: Well, again, I'm not the only one who has maintained that the virus may have come out of a laboratory.
Speaker 0: Because you're
Speaker 2: the only one sitting here today. Yeah. We do not. Right? It doesn't make any sense why you're the only one well, who else is broadcasting this?
Certainly not the government. It should be obvious to them what's obvious to us sitting here.
Speaker 1: But again, if in fact, you see that the people like let's look at the WHO, the World Health Organization. If in fact, the smallpox campaign in Africa Was responsible for the outbreak of AIDS. That's the last thing they're ever gonna admit to. So why would you expect them to come from? Of course.
Speaker 2: The world's gonna die. I mean, everybody's gonna die. That's why. I mean, they're humans too. How are they gonna protect themselves?
Speaker 1: They can.
Speaker 2: I mean, according to your time schedule, in 20 years, everybody in America or less 6 years, everyone in America's infected. Within 14 to 20 years, we're all dead. That's the end of that's the end of everything.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 2: Well, that should get people upset.
Speaker 1: It should.
Speaker 2: Because you're getting me upset right now. I mean, I mean, what you're saying is so incredible. We're sitting here very casually and cavalierly discussing it, but you're talking about the end of the world here. And the people who
Speaker 1: can I'm not the only one talking about the end of the world. Doctor Hazeltine from Harvard has said in before congress that the The AIDS virus alone not taking into account HTLV 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, one look alike, he said the AIDS virus by itself is species threatening. In other words, it has the ability to exterminate mankind. That's in the congressional record.
Speaker 2: Obviously, we're on some kind of a countdown here. Somebody doesn't faced up to it or they don't develop a vaccine or some kind
Speaker 1: of help forward, which you say I mean, I have always maintained
Speaker 2: It's impossible.
Speaker 1: That there should be a multi pronged approach, a crash, Apollo type approach which would include not only traditional therapies like development of AZT and other drugs but Development of alternative therapies in a sense alternative like laser therapies, the Rife techniques and anything else that appears practical because as far as I can see, Mankind is headed for extinction unless this virus is controlled.
Speaker 3: In Latin America and Asia,
Speaker 1: the disease seems to be spreading as it's Yeah, Latin America, particularly Brazil, the Story goes that in Brazil, Brazil bought a lot of the blood that it was transfusing in the 70s from Africa. And so that would explain how Brazil might have incurred a tremendous AIDS problem. The other problem is of course that there were IARC or who vaccine programs conducted in Brazil.
Speaker 2: You know, I'd like to get back to this question of culpability here. You said, you didn't suggest, you said That it was, was it the Navy that that paraded a steamship up and down the,
Speaker 1: No, it was the department. It was well, I don't know if it was a Navy. It was a Navy vessel, a
Speaker 2: Navy vessel
Speaker 1: that conducted
Speaker 2: Actually sprayed
Speaker 1: Serratia Marcescens bacteria into San Francisco.
Speaker 2: On being are not telling the scientists or anybody else, infected everybody and they got, according to you, 5,000 units?
Speaker 1: No. That wasn't according to me. According to the researchers who conducted the study, right. The researcher who conducted the study reported that's that is written in Paxman and Harris, a higher form of killing which is a review of biological warfare in this country. The researcher that conducted the study concluded that an average San Francisco resident inhaled 5,000 serrations marcescens bacteria during that project, which demonstrated that San Francisco was subject to a biological warfare attack.
All right.
Speaker 2: Well, anybody else catch up and say this? Go ahead, dear.
Speaker 3: This is an experiment that's gone out of hand and now they don't know what to do.
Speaker 1: A way to that in a sense, we are the experiment. The whole world has become the the experiment. And, the every person on this planet is now the experiment.
Speaker 3: Well, I think rather than going back and trying to file criminal charges or anything, that shouldn't you just leave that and just go
Speaker 1: African, you know, who woke up 1 night with a lion in his bedroom. He chased it out. He didn't look for the open window where the lion came in. He crawled back and went bed, went to sleep, and a tiger came in and ate him. So, you know, I don't believe that you can say that it's not important where these things came from.
It's extremely important. Okay. During the middle
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
They have been creating viruses for decades and they won’t stop until we make them stop. I can only imagine how differently things could have been had those people suffered consequences.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to actively work to prevent the predicted outcome of this virus. It's important for each individual to get involved and determine the truth for themselves. We shouldn't blindly accept everything we're told by so-called experts. We should engage with our community, representatives, and leaders to find a solution. I believe there is a solution, and it requires a comprehensive and urgent approach from the entire world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They have to continue on in their living as, if, what we predict in a sense is not necessarily the final outcome. That isn't to say that it can't happen, but what I mean to say is that we have to work to make it not happen. Each person has to become involved individually. This virus threatens the existence of everyone on this planet. You have to become involved and determine for yourself whether or not what we're telling you is true or false.
It doesn't take a rocket physicist to look out there and say, hey, they should not just accept everything they're being told by the so called AIDS expert in the government as absolute fact. You have to decide for yourself whether what we've told you is true or false, and then become involved with your your neighbors, your friends, your representatives, your senators, and your president. And if you do that, then hopefully we'll get to a solution. I think there is a solution. I've already illustrated what I think the solution to this problem is.
But I think that this country, the whole world has to address it in a crash program of many pronged approach.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
We all need to make our voices heard.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tell your elected politicians that you're unsatisfied with what you're being told. It doesn't make sense to trust the same people who may have started this disease and haven't found a cure for cancer in 40 years. We don't have another 40 years. Let them know that your gift of life is being threatened and that you want to live, along with your children. Act now before it's too late.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell the politicians you elected that you're not satisfied with what you're being told. Tell them it doesn't make any sense to entrust the cure for this disease to the same people who may have started it in the 1st place, the same people who haven't found a cure for cancer after 40 years of trying. Mankind doesn't have another 40 years. Tell them that God gave you the gift of life, and now that gift is being threatened. Tell them that you want to live, that you want your children to live.
Tell them now before there's no one left.
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Here is his entire presentation. It is technical but he walks through how he came to the conclusion that AIDS was man made (as Dr. Coleman also briefly mentioned in his video). https://archive.org/details/dr.-strecker
The Strecker Memorandum Video : UMOJA RESEARCH : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The Story About Dr. Robert B Strecker and the Truth About AIDS. Dr. Strecker produced a Video, The Strecker Memorandum and submitted the Historic Document,...
archive.org
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
Research https://t.co/NAgLInIZCk
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
This is a separate thread on AIDS that I’ll add to the other one from tonight. This one includes the research that I have collected while trying to verify information. This thread includes the flowchart that I tweeted about a couple of days ago and the book that it came from.…
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
An act of biological/chemical warfare 1. Intl. Covid Summit 2. Walking back the truth? 3. Anthony Fauci accused of Genocide 4. Planned Immune System destruction
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the theory that the origin of SARS-CoV-2 was a bat and pangolin in a Wuhan market. They mention that Moderna modified patent applications in 2019 to include the justification for a vaccine against a non-existent respiratory pathogen. The speaker emphasizes the premeditated nature of the alleged plan to create a universal vaccine template using coronavirus. They claim that this plan was discussed in September 2019 and intended to generate profit. The speaker accuses this act of being an act of domestic terrorism and biological and chemical warfare on humanity, as admitted in a 2015 National Academy of Sciences publication. The motive behind this act is said to be financial gain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does that sound like Leek? Does that sound like a bat and a pangolin went into a bar in the Wuhan market and hung out and had sex and and lo and behold, we got SARS CoV 2? No. Accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology used. And 4 times in April of 2019, 7 months before the allegation of patient number 1.
Four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term Accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist. Keep going. If you have not done so, please make sure that you make reference in every investigation to the premeditation nature of this Because it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed that we were going to have an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen so that by September 2020, there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine template. That's their words right in front of you on the screen. The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there.
This isn't advancing, so if I could have somebody to do Let's read this because we have to read this into the record everywhere I go. Until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at the emergency threshold, that is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical countermeasures such a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.
Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. Sounds like public health. Sounds like the best of humanity. No, ladies and gentlemen. This was premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015, published in front of them, this is an this is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race, and it was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud, investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Politicians and health bureaucrats are denying their role in advocating for lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and school closures during the pandemic. Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Prime Minister, claims he never insisted on mandatory vaccinations for everyone, despite evidence to the contrary. Anthony Fauci, a key figure in the COVID response, also tries to distance himself from the heavy-handed measures. Both leaders are attempting to rewrite history and avoid responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions. It is important to hold them accountable for the overreach and inhumane policies imposed on free people in the name of safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Politicians and health bureaucrats trying desperately to rewrite history, trying to convince people that they never advocated for crippling illiberal lock downs, vaccine mandates, school closures. No. It's not their fault. They just made recommendations. I didn't think anyone would be stupid enough to actually follow them or enforce them.
Along with Australia and New Zealand, Canada was right up there for COVID madness. But prime minister Justin Trudeau now claims that's just disinformation. He says he never insisted that everyone, young and old, healthy and infirm, get vaccinated against COVID. That's just fake news. Let's have a quick look at what Justin is saying now and what he said back then.
Speaker 1: Misinformation and disinformation Is carrying people to believe things that are untrue. And vaccinations is a perfect example of it. Any vaccine we distribute to Canadians will be safe for Canadians. There are people who've probably gotten very sick from vaccinations. Every vaccine that is improved, is safe for Canadians.
It is uncompromising. Well, individuals are allowed to make their own Choices. There may be all sorts of different reasons why someone is hesitant to get vaccinated. There's no more excuses to not get your shot. And therefore, while not Forcing anyone to get vaccinated.
Enforcement measures in place will make sure that everyone is vaccinated. I chose to make sure that all the incentives. Travelers across the country need to be fully vaccinated. People coming into the country need to be fully vaccinated. We're there.
Don't get to work in the public service, don't get to go to movie theatres or gyms or restaurants.
Speaker 0: That compilation courtesy of Milk Bard TV, but Trudeau is not alone. This week we saw Anthony Fauci, the man responsible for So much of the dysfunction surrounding our COVID response, well, Fauci now claims the heavy handed response was not his doing. Speaking to the New York Times, he's tried to absolve himself of all responsibility. Show me a school that I shut down, he said. Show me a factory tree, that I shut down.
Never. I never did. These people, my goodness, we can never forget what they inflicted on us, And there must be a reckoning for all the politicians and public health officials for the insane overreach, the inhumane policies inflicted on free people in the name of safety. They cannot be allowed to dodge responsibility.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, I want to address the AIDS epidemic and draw a parallel to the lies of Hitler during World War II. The National Institutes of Health, along with the media, are perpetrating a horrible scam in the name of science. I challenge individuals like Gallo, Fousey, Hazeltine, and Essex from the NIH, who I believe are guilty of genocide, to take me to court. Burroughs Welcome, the pharmaceutical company, has knowingly released a deadly drug. I am not alone in exposing these truths. Renowned virologist Peter Duesberg has risked his career to speak out. Despite losing his laboratory and funding, his tenured professorship remains intact.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're talking about probably the most horrible scandal and scam ever perpetrated not only in the name of science, but in humanity and in all history. Today is December 7th and I was, 12 years old when the attack on Pearl Harbor came. And I remember World War II very well. And it's a very significant day today because I see an incredible parallel between what is going on in the so called AIDS epidemic and what happened in the years preceding and resulting in World War II. The great lie of Hitler.
It's amazing. I think he would envy the job being done by members of the National Institutes of Health and even the media, especially in this country. And I will put the lie to the individuals of the NIH, particularly Gallo and Fousey and Hazeltine and Essex and the rest of these scoundrels of the worst order. Criminals guilty of genocide without a doubt, I invite them to take me to court. I wish Burroughs Welcome would take me to court because they have been putting out a killer drug knowingly.
Because in a court of law, I would have the opportunity to provide the absolute proof and evidence as I have in my book, deadly deception. Now I'm not alone in what I'm doing here today. How does the press escape such obvious truths? Why would the finest virologists in the world, the most noted virologists, member of our National Academy of Sciences, Peter Duesberg, Why would he put his entire career on the line? What did he have to gain?
He's already lost his laboratory and its funding, we can't take away his professorship because he is tenured.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that vaccines are being used to weaken and destroy people's immune systems, especially in children. They argue that vaccines are useless and harmful, and that they are actually bioweapons. The speaker also mentions the connection between the World Health Organization (WHO) and Rockefeller, suggesting a sinister agenda. They conclude by stating that the intention is to make people die faster.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What they wanna do now, the whole move behind the vaccines is to destroy your immune system and destroy it as early as possible. That's why they're giving them to children. You cannot give a child a vaccine when it is so young. Your immune system develops as you get older. And every time you come across another virus and you've conquered that one, your immune system has more antibodies.
It's filed away. Oh, yeah. I know that germ. I've done that one. And your immune system grows and grows and gets an even bigger, bunch of antibodies for almost anything.
That's how it's supposed to go. They are giving vaccines, useless and harmful vaccines, to babies, to children. They're killing off their immune systems. They're making them weak so that when they send out a pandemic, That's it for you. You cannot do anything unless you have weakened a person's immune system.
And that's what the vaccines are about. They will never tell you that. They will never tell you anything. They won't even tell you. Look at this history.
There is no history of any vaccine saving so much as one life. In fact, they are bioweapons. And if you give them to a young child and the younger the child, the more destructive they are to that immune system. And so it's a combination. It's a combination.
If you know where the WHO comes from, I think I put a note down here to where it comes from. But anyway, it was started up by Rockefeller. And what was Rockefeller into? Eugenics. Euthanasia and eugenics.
That was Rockefeller back in the thirties. They own the who. They own the NIH. So now the game is, these people aren't dying fast enough.
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
Covid-19📍PLANDEMIC 1. Consequences 2. For PROFIT Pathogen PLANDEMIC 3. Vaccine or Bioweapon 4. The history Whistleblower targeting SV40 CANCER VACCINE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Money is funneled through cover organizations to make it appear as if the US is funding a project with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The coronavirus manipulation began with researcher Ralph Barrick in 1999. The US Center for Disease Control filed a patent on the coronavirus in 2003, which could be illegal if it was either manufactured or natural. The CDC also filed patents on virus detection and measurement kits, giving them control over who could investigate the virus. This allowed them to profit from turning the coronavirus into a lucrative venture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You run the money through a series of cover organizations to make it look like you're funding a U. S. Operation, which then subcontracts with the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The US could say China did it while we know that the coronavirus manipulation started with doctor Ralph Barrick in 1999. The major characteristics of SARS, MERS, and SARS coronavirus 2.
It's a good way Ralph Barrick is the researcher at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill who is famous for his chimeric coronavirus research. In 2002, there was a recognition that the coronavirus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill. On April 25, 2003, the US Center For Disease Control filed a patent on the coronavirus transmitted to humans. Under 35 us code section 101 nature is prohibited from being patented either SARS, Coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal, or it was natural. Therefore, making a patent on it illegal.
If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons, treaties and laws. If it was natural filing a patent on it was illegal. Then either outcome, both are illegal. In the spring of 2007. The CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their application confidential and private.
They actually filed patents on not only the virus, but they also filed patents on its detection and a kit to measure it. Because of that CDC patent. They had the ability to control who was authorized and who was not authorized to make independent inquiries into coronavirus. You cannot look at the virus. You cannot measure it.
You cannot develop a test kit for it. And by ultimately receiving the patents that constrained anyone from using it, They had the means, they had the motive, and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning Coronavirus from a pathogen to profit.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the spike protein in the COVID-19 vaccine is a bioweapon, as it is a gain of function developed virus. They express concern about the experimental phase of vaccinating children and accuse leaders of experimenting on various groups. The speaker argues that there is no statistical benefit to the vaccines, and mass vaccination has led to the emergence of variants and adverse effects. They call for the vaccines to be stopped, companies to be held accountable, and mention violations of the Biological Weapons Convention Treaty, Nuremberg Code, and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the fact that the spike protein is a gain of function developed virus, which by definition is a bioweapon, Replicating that same genetic sequence and and putting it into a vaccine, it doesn't matter how you get it into the human body. It's still a it's still a bioweapon. Most alarmingly for the children right now, when you have people at an FDA meeting making a statement that we need to vaccinate the children, but we won't know what happens to them until we vaccinate them. That's the experimental phase of a research project. And as of 1947, I thought that we had officially, although it's very clear from that Tuskegee Airmen and other studies have been done, paid for by the US government, that It seems that our leaders don't have a problem experimenting on our elderly, on our police officers, on our first responders, on our doctors and nurses, on our general public, and now apparently don't have a problem experimenting on our children.
The, all the evidence shows there's no statistical benefit to using these vaccines. The mass vaccination has caused pressure selection of these variants. It has produced significant adverse effects in the people it's been given to. The FDA has admitted during its EUA documents for children that we won't know what it does to our children until we experiment on our children. It's very clear.
These vaccines have done nothing to solve the problem. They need to be stopped. The companies need to be held legally accountable. We need to hold the people accountable that have been responsible for doing this. They have violated the Biological Weapons Convention Treaty.
They have violated the Nuremberg Code. They have violated the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1957, Bernice Eddy and Sarah Stewart discovered the polyoma virus, which causes many types of cancers. Yale confirmed their findings and identified the virus as SV40. In 1960, Bernice Eddy announced this discovery to the Cancer Society in New York. However, the National Institute of Health destroyed her lab, work, and reputation as a result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1957, after the big debacle of the mass inoculation, okay, Bernice Eddy started working with a woman called Sarah Stewart. They were, persona non grata, looked on as lepers because Bernice Eddy knew enough to blow the whistle. They discovered together what was called the polyoma, poly meaning many, Oma virus. And the polyoma virus produces many types of cancers. That's why it's called polyoma, many types of cancers.
Now, when they found that out, Yale Yale tested and confirmed they were right about this virus. Okay? And it caused many cancers. All right? They also confirmed that this virus was identical to the Simeon, 40.
The SV 40. The SV 40 virus. 1960, Bernice Eddy, the same woman who worked with Sarah Stewart. All right? Bernice Eddy announces this fact.
She gives a talk. All right. She gives a talk to the Cancer Society in New York. And she announces this fact. Okay?
And, what happens to her? The National Institute of Health destroys her lab, destroys her work, and destroys her character. Assassinates her character for telling the Cancer Society the truth.
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
1. USURY HISTORY 2. WAR: JFK and Lincoln v International Banking Cartel 3. Catherine Austin Fitts CBDC Financial Coup d'état 4. 💉Prof. Richard Werner's WARNING
Video Transcript AI Summary
All three Abrahamic religions initially considered charging interest as immoral, but over time, usury became more accepted in Western society. Fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money out of thin air and charge interest on loans. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 further increased debt, while the banking cartel funded both World Wars. The US turned to its military and the petrodollar to maintain world reserve currency status. However, this Ponzi scheme is collapsing, with crashing markets and a quadrillion-dollar derivatives market. The banking cartel aims to convert everyone to an authoritarian CBDC, but without trust, they will face challenges. Hard times are approaching, and it is suggested to prepare and create a banking system that serves the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All 3 of the Abrahamic religions teach that lending to the poor is an act of compassion that serves the entire community, and therefore, charging interest was seen as immoral. It was called usury and was considered a heinous crime. The Roman Empire allowed usury. But in 11/79, the Catholic church decreed that usury was forbidden. This law did not apply to Jews.
While the Torah admonishes usury, Talmudic law allows a Jew to practice usury with a non Jew. And so money lending became primarily a Jewish business. Over the years, usury became more accepted in Western society, and we've changed the definition with the addendum of charging interest at an excessive rate. In the 17th century, the bank of England began issuing paper Fiat money. This gave the banks, the ability to simply print money out of thin air.
And for over a century, this was rightfully called out as fraud until it became public policy, known now as fractional reserve banking. What was once seen as immoral is now seen as normal. Many assume that the financial loans given out by the banks are coming from savings they hold for their depositors. But this is not true. When someone takes out a loan, the bank creates new money out of thin air, and then charges the person interest to borrow it.
Fractional reserve banking allows the banks to legally create 10 times the amount of each deposit. This inflating of the circulating currency devalues that currency and allows the banks an opportunity to profit dramatically. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, began a system of debt designed to inflate beyond its means until it implodes, the exact opposite of sound money. The banking cartel funded both sides of World War one, which led to the Great Depression, which led to the Emergency Banking Act of 1933, which ended the gold standard and made every dollar spent in IOU to further increase the debt, which is ultimately owed by the American people. The banking cartel funded both sides of World War 2, which led to the Bretton Woods monetary system, which made the USD the world reserve currency, and gave central banks the option to go straight to the gold window of the US treasury to exchange US dollars for physical gold.
But by endlessly creating more debt, it became clear that the US had printed far beyond their gold reserves. And when several nations came to collect their gold, the federal government dishonorably closed the gold window. To maintain world reserve currency status, the US turned to its military, guns for hire to Saudi Arabia in return for the petrodollar, and war with any nation who threatens USD dominance. A Ponzi scheme is an investment fraud that pays existing investors with funds collected from new investors. And that's what the bankers created.
They profit exponentially off the people's debt. It was designed to collapse, and that's what it's doing now. All the markets are crashing. And the derivatives market alone is in the quadrillions, which is much more than the total financial assets of the entire world. There is nothing left to prop up the dollar.
This Ponzi scheme is at its end. What that means is that the money you have in the banks will disappear. Everything will go to 0, and then we reset. How we do that will ultimately be up to the people. The banking cartel knows that the only way they can survive this collapse is to somehow convert everyone to an authoritarian CBDC.
But without the people's trust, the banks will have problems with this. Many people will lose everything and will want nothing but justice from the old banking system, but many others will comply. Hard times are coming fast. And if we were smart, we'd prepare. Let the big banks die and create a banking system that serves We The People.
Reporting for Infowars. This is Greg Reese.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Rothschild banking cartel and the Federal Reserve Bank are mentioned in relation to the control of a nation's money. President Kennedy's attempt to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury through an executive order is discussed, but his assassination led to a reversal of this move. President Lincoln's printing of debt-free money during the Civil War is also mentioned, with the London Times expressing concern about the potential success of this financial policy. The Bank of England's funding of the Confederacy and the involvement of individuals connected to banks in Lincoln's assassination are briefly mentioned. The video concludes by suggesting that the reaction to the coronavirus may resemble a false flag.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Godfather of the Rothschild banking cartel, mayor Amschel Rothschild said, give me control of a nation's money, and I care not who makes the laws. On June 4, 1963, president John Kennedy issued executive order 11110, which many believe was an effort to transfer power from the Federal Reserve Bank to the United state's department of the treasury, by replacing Federal Reserve notes with silver certificates, thereby taking the power away from the international banking cartels. Less than 6 months later, president Kennedy was assassinated, and his move against the Fed was reversed. During the Civil War, president Abraham Lincoln printed $400,000,000 worth of greenbacks. A debt free interest free money, independent of international bank control.
In response, the London Times wrote that if that mischievous financial policy which had its origin in the North American Republic could become indurated down to a fixture, then that government it will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary dare to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America.
That government must be destroyed or it we'll destroy every monarchy on the globe. The bankers were not willing to lose power and the Bank of England went on to fund the Confederacy. Weeks prior to Lincoln's assassination, assassin John Wilkes Booth spent time in Montreal known as the Confederate capital of Canada, and was found after the assassination with a banknote from Ontario Bank. Boots' personal manager was banker Joseph Siemens. After Lincoln was killed, power was restored to the international general banking cartel.
The coronavirus scare is beginning to look like a false alarm, but the reaction is looking just like a false flag.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that central banks are unnecessary and that the treasury should print money instead. They believe that in the digital age, people will realize they don't need central banks and can rely on the treasury to issue currency. The pressure on central banks is due to the fear of losing control if they don't adopt Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) during the reset. Another speaker questions if the monetary policies implemented in response to COVID-19 were preplanned. The first speaker explains that part of the reset involved the pandemic, using political mechanisms to collapse the economy and implement a new governance system dependent on CBDCs. This involves injecting money into certain areas while starving others, creating winners and losers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We don't need central banks. The treasury could just print the money, you know. And part of the challenge that the central bankers have, Taylor, is it's pretty clear in a digital age at some point everybody's going to get together and say, you know, we don't need these guys. And we certainly don't need to assume this kind of debt to have them, you know, sort of generate our finance our economy. We can just have treasury issue, the currency itself.
And so I think part of the pressure on the central banks, they know if they don't use CBDCs to go to complete control during this reset, you know, they may be they may lose control entirely.
Speaker 1: So is it fair to say that the monetary policies implemented In response to COVID nineteen were voted on more than 6 months prior to COVID being declared a pandemic? And if so, doesn't that indicate preplanning? So here's the question,
Speaker 0: how many of the people doing the going direct reset realize that part of the operation would be the pandemic? You know, usually, the leadership is pretty good about keeping the compartments separate so that not everybody knows everything. You know, clearly some of the people in the room understood that that you weren't going to depend on financial mechanisms to collapse the economy that you would use political mechanisms to collapse the economy. And when I say collapse the economy, remember, they're trying to build a new governance and management system that depends on CBDCs and so you need to implement the smart grid. What you want to do as you're doing your reset is you want to inject money, fantastic tsunamis of money, into the areas that you want to grow or that you want to pump and dump, and you want to starve other parts.
But then you want to starve small business, slaughter the economy of the people you want wiped out, then they're able to take the money you've injected and and buy everything up cheap. So it's a way of setting up winners and losers. You print money and give it to your pals and then you use the health care system to destroy the businesses of the people that you want, you know, your pals to get the market share away from or pick up the assets from cheap.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the point? I mean, I hear you you're saying they're trying to create a crisis because when you when you create a crisis and you can affect change, what is the change you think they're trying to do right now to us?
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, actually, we have to look at at at the picture, the big picture of what has happened Since 2020 and and on the one hand, the central bankers have come out since 2020 very quickly already in March 2020 With some public statements about what they want to do. And surprise, surprise, they want to introduce CBDCs. So that is clearly one goal. Now in order to introduce central bank digital currencies, What they need is digital IDs.
And, truly, they've been working backwards from that goal. How can we introduce CBDCs? We need an excuse, and then work backwards. What do we need for that? We need digital IDs.
Well, Again, how do we introduce digital IDs with another excuse to do that? Well, the so called pandemic delivered a great excuse. Well, at least they thought. I mean, it wasn't really very convincing, but somehow they argued that you needed to be injected with this experimental substance And and then somehow you need it in order to enter any restaurant or shop. You need a digital ID Confirming that you've been injected when, of course, it was very quickly clear that this was not This injection was not actually slowing transmission or preventing illness and had a lot of risks attached to them.
So So the justification wasn't very strong, but they definitely push these digital IDs, the back so called vaccine passports very hard and again in a coordinated fashion. So you see where this is going. And the goal is actually on the monetary side. That is the the price they're they're aiming for. They're aiming for CBDCs connected to digital IDs, and that means We're talking about the most totalitarian control system in in in human history.
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
HOW CIVILIZATIONS FALL 1. The War Department and Hollywood PROPAGANDA 2. DEBT and WAR 3. All Wars Are Bankers' Wars 4. BIOWEAPONS used against civilians
Video Transcript AI Summary
Henry, Joe, and Mike are ordinary Americans who are being targeted by people trying to take advantage of them. They are being warned about the dangers of prejudice and division, as seen in Nazi Germany. The speaker emphasizes the importance of unity and protecting everyone's freedom and dignity, regardless of race, color, or religion. They urge people to guard against persecution and prejudice, as it threatens the freedom of all. In America, where diversity is celebrated, it is crucial to stand together and think of "us" instead of "we" and "they."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Henry here got on the train with $200. He couldn't see any harm in a friendly game of cards. What if the other men were strangers? And take Joe Collins. He's got a nice wife at home.
But he met this girl at the bar and she looked after the first couple of drinks. There's a good old fashioned word for people like us. We call them suckers. And there are other people. People who stay up nights figuring out how to take away what they've got.
There are all kinds of games. Mike here, for instance. He's got everything in me. He's young. He's healthy.
Got a job. And he's got a money of food. Big factories to make things a man can use. Big cities to do the business of a big company. And people.
Lots of people. Enough to work the fawn and build the factories, dig the mines, Run the business. All kinds of people. People from different countries with different religions. Different colored skins.
Free people. They can live together and work together And build America together because they're free. Free to vote. To say what they pleased. Go to their own churches.
To pick their own jobs. Yeah. Mike's got something. All right. He's got America.
But there are guys who stay up nights figuring out how to take that away from him.
Speaker 1: I happen to know the facts. Now friends, I'm just an average American, but I'm an American American. And some of the things I see in this country large make my blood boil. I see people with foreign apple of money. I see Negroes holding jobs that belong to me and you.
Now I ask Ask you, if we allow this thing to go on, what's gonna become of us real Americans?
Speaker 2: I've heard this kind of talk before, but I never expected Mister Judith in America.
Speaker 3: Well, it seems you know what he's talking about.
Speaker 4: What are
Speaker 1: we reading when the hackers gonna do a lot? You'll find it right here in this little pamphlet. The truth about Negroes and foreigners. The truth about the Catholic church.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't you believe in that kind of talk? You know, it
Speaker 3: makes pretty good sense to me.
Speaker 1: And I tell you, friends, we'll never be able to call this country our own
Speaker 5: Until it's a country without.
Speaker 1: Without what? Yeah. Without what? Without Negroes, without alien foreigners, Without Catholics. Without Freemasons.
You know these things.
Speaker 3: What's wrong with the Masons? I'm a Mason. Hey. That fella's talking about me.
Speaker 2: And that makes a difference, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: These are your enemies. These are the people who are trying to take over our country. Now you know them. You know what they stand for. And it's up to you and me to fight them.
I come and destroy them before they destroy us. Thank him.
Speaker 2: Before he said, miss, you were ready to agree with him.
Speaker 3: Yes. But he was talking about what about those other people?
Speaker 2: But in this country, we have no other people. We are American peoples.
Speaker 3: What about you?
Speaker 2: You aren't American. Are you? I was born in Hungary, but now I am an American citizen. And I have seen what this kind of talk can do. I saw it in Berlin.
Speaker 3: What were you doing there? I was
Speaker 2: a professor at the university. I heard the same words we have heard today. But I was a fool then. I thought Nazis were crazy people, stupid fanatics. But, unfortunately, it was not so.
You see, they knew that they were not strong enough to conquer a unified country. So they split Germany into small groups. They used prejudice as a practical weapon to cripple the nation. Of course, that was not easy to do. They had to work hard to do it.
You see, we human beings are not born with tragedies. Always they are made for us. Made by someone who wants something. Remember that when you hear this kind of talk. Somebody is going to get something out of it, and it isn't going to be you.
This is not classroom theory. I saw it happen. I saw it first in Berlin in 1932. Five young men that I knew were standing in the crowd listening to the Nazi speaker. Eric was a Catholic.
Anton, a student of mine, was a Jew. Heinrich owned a small hardware store. Karl was a farmer, and Hans was an unemployed metal worker.
Speaker 4: To all the Aryan Germans, I say at this time, you inherited the nation which rightfully belongs to you. To you alone belongs the glorious Destiny of the Greater Germany. The nasty party that provides land for the farmer, work for the worker, and profits for the small businessmen. Who is getting these things now? The Jew.
The Jew who has stolen our nation and our birthright. Who makes all the money and takes all our jobs? The Jew. He must be shunned. He must be ostracized.
He must be eliminated. And the Catholics, we don't want our great nation run by a foreign church. We Germans will know what to do with these people when the time comes. They and their faith must be destroyed. Then there are the freemasons.
In Germany, we have no place for secret societies. There will be only 1 society, and that is a Nazi party. There will be no secrecy about that In the new Greater Germany.
Speaker 2: 1 by 1, he attacked each minority and he split them off 1 from the other. These men were all fellow Germans when they came here today. Now they were split into rival groups suspicious of each other, hating each other. They were being swindlers. All of them.
But the man who was really being fooled was Hans. He was pure German according to Nazi standards. To him, they promised everything, and he fell for it. That's how Hans became a Superman. They gave him a uniform and they pumped up his ego.
He wasn't just a little fellow out of work anymore. He was a member of the master race. Huns and thousands of others like him, all playing a soccer's game. They gambled with other people's liberty. And, of course, they lost their own.
A nation of suckers. Hitler needed these people. There was lots of work to be done. There were trade unions to be smashed because unions were organized and might offer resistance. There were many political parties in Germany.
These the Nazis destroyed. They were determined To smash every organization where people might band together and resist them. There were Jews to be beaten and killed. The Jews were not Powerful, but they were a convenient excuse for all the nation's ills. And besides, a Nazi party member could not take over this man's stall.
Hundreds of Catholics were put in jail because the Catholic church had strength and could resist the Nazi dreadful powers. They had split the nation into a 100 pieces. And then 1 by 1, they had destroyed the pieces. Over these broken pieces, the Nazis rode into power. 1 party, 1 nation, 1 religion.
These men had won their struggle for power. They now ruled all of Germany. But still they had trouble with their oldest and most persistent enemy, the truth. They found that truth does not die easily, And so they decided to abolish truth. One great source of truth is literature.
So they burned books, 20,000,000 of them. Many great men in Germany who were spokesman for truth were jailed or driven from their country. Teachers, writers, scientists. Education was discouraged. In 5 years, college attendance dropped 53%.
It was forbidden to listen to a British radio program or read an American newspaper. In Nazi Germany, you had get your information from doctor Goebbels. He knew what was best for you. The church was one force in Germany still strong enough to proclaim the truth in public. This Catholic priest was arrested the following day on charges of immorality.
The Protestant church also continued to try and fight for truth. The Nazis put this man in a concentration camp. There were others who spoke for truth, and I am proud to say that educators were among them.
Speaker 5: And what, may I ask, is an area. I don't know my son. But let us see what our present so called authorities have to say about it. They say he is tall, Slender.
Speaker 1: Blue eyes and blonde.
Speaker 5: There is no Aryan race. And more important, There is no master race. There are people who may find these ideas convenient, but science Cannot support. There is no scientific proof that there's any correlation Between a man's racial characteristics and his native ability or character, in all racial groups, He finds the same range of potentialities. We find idiots and geniuses.
We find criminals and philanthropists. We must judge each man as an individual And not by the color of his skin, or his eyes, or by the length of his nose. Come in, gentlemen. It's comfortable. And remember that there is no master race.
That is a scientific truth. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying.
Speaker 2: And so for all practical purposes, truth had been abolished in Germany. A lot of my German friends wondered what had hit them. How did it happen? Where did it start? It started right here.
And this was where it could have been stopped. If those people had stood together, If they had protected each other, they could have resisted the Nazi threat. Together, they would have been strong. But once they allowed themselves to be split apart, They were helpless. When that first minority lost out, everybody lost out.
They made the mistake of gambling with other people's freedom. Now let's see how those bets paid off. Carl, the farmer, was gambling on a better life for himself. What he got was extra hours of back breaking word. As much as a 100 hour a week.
He was forced to stay on his land and produce what he was told to produce. Because now Hitler was preparing for war. For Heinrich who owned the hardware store, the bet didn't pay off either. 104,000 small businesses were closed in 2 years. And for Hans, conditions hadn't improved any.
He had a job now in the munitions factory. But he worked long hours for little pay. The working conditions grew increasingly bad. And even though he didn't like the job, he wasn't permitted to leave it. And when Hitler decided the time was right, Germany went to war.
Not by declaring war, But by a carefully prepared sneak attack. Once again, Hitler needed Hans to do his dirty work. Hans was an expert at brutality this time. And Hitler had decided to use Hans and his brutality against other peoples, The Czechs, the Poles, the French, the Russians. But in the crucial test of war, Hitler's His race theories didn't pay off.
His pure blooded Superman were defeated by the mongrel armies he despised, By the British of El Alamein. By the Russians at Stalingrad. Then on b day, the American soldiers of every color and religion who smashed across the Normandy beaches And drove on through to the heart of Germany. For the misguided Germans who had swallowed the Nazi bait, The Nazi game did not pay off. The continent of Europe was strewn with millions of German bodies, Pure Aryan buddies.
Karl, the farmer, was left in the snow outside of Moscow. Heinrich stayed in Italy at Salerno. And Hans, who was going to rule the world, Got only a little patch of Normandy that he could call his own. We must never let that happen to us or to our country. We must never let ourselves be divided by race or color or religion because in this country, we all belong to minority groups.
I was born in Hungary. You are a Mason. These are minorities. And then you belong to other minority groups too. You are a farmer.
You have blueberries. You go to the Methodist Church. Your right to belong to this minority. This is a precious thing. You have a right To be what you are and say what you think because here we have personal freedom.
We have liberty. And these are not just fancy words. This is a practical and priceless way of living. But we must work at it. We must guard everyone's liberties or we can lose our own.
If we allow any minority to lose its freedom by persecution or by prejudice, we are threatening our own freedom. And this is not simply an idea. This is good, hard common sense. You see, Here in America, it's not a question whether we tolerate minorities. America is minorities, and that means you and me.
So let's not be suckers. We must not allow the freedom or dignity of any man to be threatened by any act or word. Let's be selfish about it. Let's forget about we and they. Let's think about us.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The banking industry's objective is not to control conflicts, but rather to control the debt that conflicts generate. They understand that the true value lies in the debt itself, as it grants them control over everything. This may be unsettling, but it is the essence of the banking industry, making nations and individuals slaves to debt. The crash of 1929, known as the Great Depression, revealed the invalidity of the economic game's rules. World War 2 further exemplified the destruction caused by nations systematically destroying each other. The resources wasted on the war could have easily met every human need. Since then, humanity has been on a path towards self-extinction, wasting finite resources in the pursuit of profit and mindless consumption. The monetary powers continue to control the political structure, just as they did 75 years ago. It's time for a change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Their objective isn't to control the conflict, it's to control the debt that the conflict produces. You see, the real value of a conflict, the true value, is in the debt that it creates. You control the debt. You control everything. You find this upsetting, yes.
But this is the very essence of the banking industry to make us all, whether we be nations or individuals, slaves to debt.
Speaker 1: Then came the crash of 1929, which began what we now call the Great Depression. I found it difficult to understand why millions were out of work, homeless, starving, while all the factories were sitting there. The resources were unchanged. It was then that I realized that the rules of the economic game were inherently invalid. Shortly after came World War 2, where various nations took turns Systematically destroying each other.
I later calculated that all the destruction and wasted resources spent on that war Could have easily provided for every human need on the planet. Since that time, I have watched humanity set the stage for its own extinction. I have I've watched as the precious finite resources are perpetually wasted and destroyed in the name of profit and free markets. I have Watch the social values of society be reduced into a base artificiality of materialism And mindless consumption. And I have watched as the monetary powers control the political structure I'm It's the same as it was 75 years ago.
This shit's got to go.
Video Transcript AI Summary
All wars and assassinations are initiated by central bankers, who aim to force private central banks onto nations against their will. The United States government is currently involved in numerous wars with foreign nations for this purpose. Private central banking is all about enlarging their domain and imposing their system on unwilling nations and rulers through bribery, blackmail, and assassination. As long as private central banks exist, poverty, hopelessness, and endless world wars will persist, leading to the sacrifice of the earth itself. Various individuals confess to their involvement in making countries safe for American oil interests and benefiting Wall Street. The central banks are working towards creating a feudal system where governments are controlled, ultimately leading to control over the people of the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All wars are bankers wars. All of these wars and assassinations that we're told are central bankers as the initiating event. And the more you study this, the more you will realize all the wars are wars for the bankers, for the private central bankers. And I know a lot of people are going to have difficulty comprehending this, Just how many of these wars we have fought as a nation were fought for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations that did not want Danger. So we're gonna have a few examples, so you understand why at this particular time in history, the United States government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations.
War is the bankers richest harvest. We all need to recognize this is what all these wars have been about. Private central banking, enlarging their domain, imposing their will on nations that do not want it, imposing their system on the rulers of nations who do not want it. A bribery, blackmail, assassination, they will do anything to maintain their stranglehold on the productivity of the world's people. Danger.
I was the a director, we lied. We cheated. We see. And as long as private central banks are allowed to exist, inevitably, as the night follows the day, there will be poverty, hopelessness, millions of deaths in endless world wars until the earth itself is sacrificed.
Speaker 1: I help make Mexico safe for American oil interests. I help make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National Citibank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street.
Speaker 0: Dangerous.
Speaker 2: But the central banks of the world are working to create a fast a feudal system by which assassinations. They can control the governments and then the governments will control the people of the world.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Public health has become militarized, with the military using public health language and laws to carry out a military campaign. COVID-19 vaccines are referred to as weapons, and clinical trials were not necessary for the Department of Defense (DoD) to pay contractors for producing and distributing them. The World Health Organization declared a public health emergency, triggering the domestic framework and the issuance of executive orders by Congress and Presidents Trump and Biden. This has created a funding stream for military-led bioweapons research. People potentially carrying the disease are classified as national security threats, allowing actions without consent. The framework also shields the government, developers, and regulators from liability and criminal prosecution. This is a joint project involving the DoD, Federal Reserve, World Health Organization, and Bank for International Settlements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Public health has been militarized, and the military has been sort of turned into a public health front or, Potemkin village, such that they are using public health language and public health laws to actually carry out a military campaign. And I would not call them DOD vaccines. I would call them DOD weapons. Clinical trials were never material or necessary for DoD to pay the contractors for producing and distributing the bio weapons known as COVID nineteen vaccines. The, World Health Organization secretary general issued the public health emergency of international concern at the end of January 2020.
And the HHS secretary immediately triggered the domestic framework through the determination that a public health emergency exists, followed by PREP Act declarations for medical countermeasures, which are the weapons. And then Congress and the Presidents, Trump and Biden, passed several additional congressional acts, funding and, reinforcing the structure of the Tillbox and issued more executive orders under the Defense Production Act, under the Stafford Act, under the National Emergencies Act to sort of build out the program. What it built is a huge public and private funding stream for military led, bioweapons research and use. Eliminated a form consent, by reclassifying people who could potentially be carrying the disease as presumptive national security threats, so that you can do anything you want to them because you're on a war footing. And to shield the products and weapons from product liability, to shield all the people involved from criminal liability and civil liability and to shield the government funders, developers, and regulators from criminal prosecution under the other laws which are in place that are sort of superseded by this this framework for use of bioweapons, use of chemical weapons, terrorism, things like that.
I see it as a joint project between the US Department of Defense, a coordinating committee of that, the Federal Reserve and the World Health Organization and the Bank For International Settlements.
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
🏦The Puppet Masters 🏦BANKS FOUNDATIONS SECRET SOCIETIES 🏦WALL STREET behind Hitler USSR Israel 🥼Social engineering 🐍Tavistock PNAC PLAN FOR TOTALITARIANISM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The first two 5-year plans in the Soviet Union were designed by American corporations. The New Economic Policy, initiated by Lenin in 1923, saw Russian industries rebuilt by foreign corporations, including German, British, French, and American companies. By 1928, Russia had regained its industrial output and started developing ambitious 5-year plans. The Russian Government Planning Commission, known as GOS Plan, initially designed the plans but found them inadequate. American corporations were then brought in to design the first and second 5-year plans. This involvement of American industry provided technology, finance, and materials that ultimately contributed to Hitler's war machine. It is also worth noting that April Harriman, a member of the Pilgrim Society, acted as a dictator in Russia from 1942 to 1944 during Stalin's nervous breakdown, which is not widely known.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1st 5 year plan and the 2nd 5 year plan were actually designed in the United States by American corporations.
Speaker 1: Can you tell us about the 5 year plans and the part that the major American Major world corporations played in building up the Soviet Union. Well, there
Speaker 0: are 2 separate phases here. The new New economic policy was started in 1923 by Lenin. And I found and I published this in my first book from Stanford, that that every single Russian industry was rebuilt or restarted by foreign corporations, mostly German, British, French and American. By 1928, Russia was back to approximately its in industrial output. And at that point, as you begin to think of these grandiose 5 year plans.
And in 1928, GOS Plan, which is the Russian Government Planning Commission actually designed an initial 5 year plan, but this was still not, it was inadequate. And American corporations were built in, were brought into Russia. And the 1st 5 year plan and the 2nd 5 year plan were actually designed in the United States by American corporations.
Speaker 1: Basically, what we're seeing then is American industry helping to provide the technology, helping To provide the finance, helping to provide the material that is going to allow Hitler to create his War machine? Yes, that is correct. That is correct.
Speaker 2: In fact, April Harriman, who was a member of the Pilgrim Society, Actually was dictator Russia from 1942 to 1944, because Stalin had a nervous breakdown. And Abraham and moved in and functioned as a dictator of Russia for 2 years during World War II, which is not very widely known, but He ostensibly was U. S. Ambassador to Russia, but he actually was a dictator of Russia during that period.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The major tax exempt foundations in the US have a hidden agenda. In 1908, the Carnegie trustees discussed the most effective means to alter the life of a people, concluding that war was the answer. They also wanted to involve the United States in a war, despite objections of antisemitism. The Rockefeller Foundation and Carnegie Endowment tried to change American history teaching but were rejected by prominent historians. So, they decided to recruit their own historians by offering fellowships to young aspiring teachers. The video questions if the mass media adequately covered the findings of the Reece Committee in the 1950s.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The major tax exempt foundations of this land have been operating to promote a hidden agenda.
Speaker 1: The year in 1908, which was the year that the Carnegie began operations. And in that year, the trustees meeting for the first time raise a specific question, which they discuss throughout the balance of the year in a very learned fashion. And the question is, is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people. And they conclude that No, no, no more effective means than war to that end is known to humanity. They raised the 2nd question and discuss it.
Namely, how do we involve the United States in a war? Their objection was, as they put it, my devotion to what they call antisemitism. That was a cooked up idea. But in in other ways, it wasn't true at all. But anyway, that's the way I expressed it.
Speaker 2: The Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment decided that the crooks of the matter lay in their did to alter the teaching of American history in this country. So they approached Then 3 of the most prominent historians with that suggestion, and they were turned down flat. So So then they decided they'd have to build their own stable of historians. And so they then approached the oh when we find the likely young man who's headed to become a teacher of American history, and will you You grant him, on I say so, a fellowship. And the answer was yes.
We will. Did the mass media in in the 19 fifties, adequate adequately cover the findings of the Reece Committee.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Corporations aimed to change Americans' mindset from focusing on needs to desires, as stated by Wall Street banker Paul Mazur. Edward Bernays played a crucial role in incorporating psychological theories, particularly those of Sigmund Freud, into corporate strategies. With the support of New York banks, department stores were established across the country to sell mass-produced goods. Bernays, working for William Randolph Hearst, promoted women's magazines by associating them with famous film stars and implementing product placement in movies. He also pioneered the idea of cars as symbols of male sexuality. Bernays used psychologists to endorse products and presented their reports as independent studies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the corporations realized they had to do was transform the way the majority of Americans thought about products. One leading Wall Street banker, Paul Mazur of Lehman Brothers, was clear about what was necessary. We must shift America, he wrote, From a needs to a desires culture. People must be trained to desire, to want new things even before the old have been entirely consumed. We must shape a new mentality in America.
Man's desires must overshadow his needs.
Speaker 1: Bernays really is the guy within the United States more than anybody else who sort of brings to the table Psychological theory as something that is an essential part of how, from the corporate side, Of how we are going to appeal to the masses effectively in the whole sort of merchandising establishment and sales and sales establishment is ready for Sigmund Freud. I mean, they are ready for understanding what motivates the human mind. And so that there's this real openness to Rene's techniques being used to sell products to the masses.
Speaker 0: Beginning in the early twenties, the New York banks funded the creation of chains of department stores across America. They were to be the outlet for the mass produced goods. And Bernays' job is to produce the new type of customer. Bernays began to create many of the techniques of mass consumer persuasion We now look at it. He was employed by William Randolph Hearst to promote his new women's magazines.
And Bernays glamorized them By placing articles and advertisements that link products made by others of his clients to famous film stars like Clara Bow, who was also his Bernet has also began the practice of product placement in the movies. And he dressed the stars of the film's premieres with clothes and jewelry from other firms he represented. He was, he claimed, the 1st person to tell car companies they could sell cars the symbols of male sexuality. He employed psychologists to issue reports that said products were good for you and then pretended they were independent studies.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A globalist government aims to control society and reduce population. The British war propaganda bureau, led by Lloyd George, produced pro-war propaganda during the First World War. The Tavistock Institute, owned by the Royal Institute For International Affairs, holds secretive meetings like the Bilderberg Group. Financial support for these organizations came from the Astor family, JPMorgan, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, and John D. Rockefeller. Lord Northcliffe, owner of the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror, played a crucial role in brainwashing the public. Tavistock received funding from the British Royal Family and the Rothschilds. Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays were involved in mass manipulation. The influx of Africans, Arabs, and others into Europe has caused political chaos and the rise of nationalist groups opposing immigration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A one world globalist totalitarian government set on reducing population and controlling all aspects of society. Lloyd George, the chancellor of the Exchequer, was given the task of setting up a British war propaganda bureau. A number of writers were put to work cranking out pro war propaganda to promote and demand participation in the so called The Great War, now known as the First World War. The Tavistock Institute at Sussex University in London is owned and controlled by the Royal Institute For International Affairs, also known as the Chatham House. Its meetings are secret like those held by the Bilderberg Group.
Financial backers of this organization included the Astor family. Its American equivalent, the Council on Foreign Relations, was funded by JPMorgan, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, John d Rockefeller, and others. The Wellington House rule in the effort to manipulate both British and American citizens, and demand their unwavering support for mass murder and sacrifice was headed up by the Viscount Baron and Alfred Charles William Harmsworth, the 1st viscount of Northcliffe. Northcliffe was essential to the brainwashing project. He owned the Daily Mail and the Daily Mirror Newspapers.
Rothermere was the Chairman of the Daily Mail and general trust. According to Coleman's research, Tavistock received its funding from the British Royal Family, and later the Rothschilds to whom Lord Northcliffe was related through marriage. At least 2 Americans were involved in this project of mass manipulation of the public. Walter Lippmann and Edward Bernays. In Europe, large numbers of Africans, Arabs, and others are flooding the continent, resulting in social and political chaos as 2 widely different cultures clash.
This highly disruptive force has resulted in severe political polarization and the rise of Nationalist groups opposed to continued immigration and asylum status.
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
WELCOME to the APOCALYPSE: HELL on EARTH ALL ROADS LEAD TO THE PRIVATELY OWNED CENTRAL BANKS Corruption. They named their A.I. S.A.T.A.N https://youtu.be/ZL8OqjxwCnw?list=PLHSL33o2NTsDagQRrSfsdDOhzG-qNXnTY&t=5348
Video Transcript AI Summary
The first two 5-year plans in the Soviet Union were designed by American corporations. The New Economic Policy, initiated by Lenin in 1923, saw Russian industries rebuilt by foreign corporations, including German, British, French, and American companies. By 1928, Russia had regained its industrial output and started implementing ambitious 5-year plans. The Russian Government Planning Commission, known as GOS Plan, initially designed the plans but found them inadequate. American corporations were then brought in to design the first and second 5-year plans. This involvement of American industry provided technology, finance, and materials that ultimately contributed to Hitler's war machine. It is also worth noting that April Harriman, a member of the Pilgrim Society, acted as a dictator in Russia from 1942 to 1944 during Stalin's nervous breakdown, which is not widely known.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1st 5 year plan and the 2nd 5 year plan were actually designed in the United States by American corporations.
Speaker 1: Can you tell us about the 5 year plans and the part that the major American Major world corporations played in building up the Soviet Union. Well, there
Speaker 0: are 2 separate phases here. The new New economic policy was started in 1923 by Lenin. And I found and I published this in my first book from Stanford, that that every single Russian industry was rebuilt or restarted by foreign corporations, mostly German, British, French and American. By 1928, Russia was back to approximately its in industrial output. And at that point, as you begin to think of these grandiose 5 year plans.
And in 1928, GOS Plan, which is the Russian Government Planning Commission actually designed an initial 5 year plan, but this was still not, it was inadequate. And American corporations were built in, were brought into Russia. And the 1st 5 year plan and the 2nd 5 year plan were actually designed in the United States by American corporations.
Speaker 1: Basically, what we're seeing then is American industry helping to provide the technology, helping To provide the finance, helping to provide the material that is going to allow Hitler to create his War machine? Yes, that is correct. That is correct.
Speaker 2: In fact, April Harriman, who was a member of the Pilgrim Society, Actually was dictator Russia from 1942 to 1944, because Stalin had a nervous breakdown. And Abraham and moved in and functioned as a dictator of Russia for 2 years during World War II, which is not very widely known, but He ostensibly was U. S. Ambassador to Russia, but he actually was a dictator of Russia during that period.
Video Transcript AI Summary
All banks, including Bank Santander, Deutsche Bank, and Royal Bank of Scotland, are broke due to the system of fractional reserve banking. This system allows banks to lend money they don't actually have, which is a criminal scandal. The political sphere and central banks contribute to the problem with moral hazard and counterfeiting, also known as quantitative easing. Central banks manipulate interest rates, not retail banks. Additionally, deposit guarantees are discussed casually, but when banks fail, taxpayers bear the cost. The speaker believes that bankers, including central bankers and politicians, should be sent to prison for their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is my opinion that you do not really understand the concept of banking. All the banks are broke. Bank Santander, Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, they're all broke. And why are they broke? It isn't an act of God.
It isn't some sort of tsunami. They're broke because we have a system called fractional reserve banking, which means that banks can lend money that they don't actually have. It's a criminal scandal, and it's been going on for too long. To add to that problem, you have moral hazard, a very significant moral hazard from the political sphere. And most of the problem starts in politics and central banks, which are part of the same political system.
We have counterfeiting, sometimes called quantitative easing, but counterfeiting by Any other name, the artificial printing of money, which if any ordinary person did, they'd go to prison for a very long time, and yet governments and central banks do it all the time. Central banks repress the amount of interest that rate rates are so we don't have the real cost of money, and yet we blame the real retail banks for manipulating LIBOR. The sheer effrontery of this is quite astonishing. It's central banks. It's central banks that manipulate interest rates, commissioner.
And, plus, underneath all this, we talk loosely in a rather cavalier fashion, do we not, about deposit guarantees. So when banks go broke through their own incompetence and chicanery, the taxpayer picks up the tab. It's theft from the taxpayer. And until we start sending bankers, and I include central bankers and politicians to prison for this outrage, It will continue.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The ruling factions on this planet are actively engaged in genetically modifying all life to further the transhumanist agenda. This is done through chemtrails, harp arrays, wireless technology, smart meters, repressive legislation, genetically modified food, water table destruction, and brain inhibiting toxins like fluoride. The evidence is right before our eyes if we take the time to look. Governments worldwide are breaching the trust of their people, whether elected or dictatorial, by acting out of greed or belief in the system. Our response to these issues is compartmentalized and ineffective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When one puts all the pieces of the puzzle together on the table, the chemtrails, the harp arrays that are appearing all over the planet, the promotion of wireless technology, the smart meters, the introduction of repressive legislation such as codex elementarius, the mandatory use of Monsanto genetically modified food, the destruction of the water table, the introduction of brain inhibiting toxins such as fluoride into people's diets, it becomes quite evident that the ruling factions on this planet are actively engaged in the genetic modification of all life on this planet in order to further the transhumanist agenda. It is being done quite deliberately and quite purposefully, and is being done with neither the knowledge nor the consent of the vast majority of mankind. And all the evidence needed to support this conclusion is right before your eyes, if people would simply take the time to look. The truth is that everything we are facing is visible in plain sight and so is its inevitable conclusion. It's just that people tend to focus on their own little symptom and never step back to view the entire structure of our world holistically.
And thus, our response to the problem is compartmentalized, essentially rendering it ineffective. Every single government that exists anywhere in the world today is currently operating in breach of the trust that has been granted to it by the people of their nation. And this is true regardless of which country we are talking about. It is true whether it is a government consisting of duly elected politicians claiming to act in the best interest of the people whether they are acting out of greed or whether they are simply acting through their belief that the system is real. It is true whether it is a military dictatorship falsely declaring a self granted right to dictate what is good for others.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am inside a Faraday cage, which blocks all signals from entering or leaving. There is also an 8 channel scrambler as a backup. I am doing this because I consider myself an escaped slave from the system. I believe that everyone is a slave to the American industrial corporate complex, controlled by the government. I urge you to free yourselves from this existence and the lies and deception that come with it. Life is a beautiful mystery, but only if you are free from those who manipulate and deceive you. I will continue to speak out, even though I will not be found. Thank you for listening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are asking what this cage of tin foil and metal is all about that's around me. It's a Faraday cage. A Faraday cage is a cage which emits no signal and no signal can enter and you can see here, it's all around, including the floor, all metal, and the ceiling. Why am I doing this? Why am I going to this trouble?
Oh, in addition to the Faraday cage, we have an 8 channel scrambler, which you can see here, I hope, which prevents any signal from getting into this room or leaving this room, just in case the Faraday cage fails. Why am I doing this? Because I am an escaped slave, a slave to the system that escaped and I have a loud voice. You think you're not slaves, but you are. The 9 to 5 existence of your current lives is structured by the American industrial corporate complex, complicit with our government.
You need to free yourselves on this. Not as me. You don't have to go out and and risk yourself by speaking out loudly, but free yourselves. This is not what life is. This is not what life is.
Life is a great mystery a glorious, unbelievably mysterious, beautiful existence if you are free from those who control you, provide you with propaganda, lie to you, deceive you. Everyone is looking for this escaped slave. I will not be found, and I will continue to speak. Thank you for listening.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
ROCKEFELLER - MAKING🚨PEDOPHILES🚨GREAT. 🚨🚨WARNING🚨🚨 What Happened to Alfred Kinsey's "Research" Victims from 1940s - 50s https://youtu.be/_DeuGU6KiZc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alfred Kinsey's research, funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, had a significant impact on American society. His studies on male and female sexual behavior helped shape the sexual revolution of the 1960s and 1970s. However, his research also involved child sexual abuse, including infants as young as two months old. Kinsey advocated for the normalization of sex between adults and children, as well as sex with animals. David Rockefeller, from a powerful family, passed away at 101 years old. The Rockefeller family has been involved in controversial activities such as patenting the Zika virus and funding eugenics. Kinsey's research, though influential, has been criticized as fraudulent and criminal. It is argued that his work led to changes in criminal laws, but investigations and apologies for the abuse of thousands of children are needed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speaking of sex, Alfred Kinsey's research was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation through the National Research Council's Committee for the Research in Problems of Sex. If you don't know who Alfred Kinsey is, he is one of the most influential Americans of the 20th century. He conducted landmark Studies of the Male and Female Sexual Behavior that helped usher in the sexual resolution of the 19 sixties and 19 seventies which also involved systematic child Sexual Abuse, mostly of boys, as young as 2 months old. In the name of science, Kenzie published his findings of orgasms in infants and children. Also in the name of science, Kinsey created field that advocated for the normalization of sex between adults and children, including infants and youth, as well as sex with animals, which brings us to our final fact, our final David facts.
David Rockefeller died a 101 years old on March 20th. A man from the most powerful Family in the United States. A man from a family who patent the Zika virus, funded eugenics, and funded a man who masturbated children for a living.
Speaker 1: Kinsey actually had an influence on changing the criminal laws in the 19 fifties. Mhmm. And yet his research is both Fraudulent and criminal itself because if you go to table
Speaker 2: torture of a 100 is up to 2,035 infants and children, the youngest Being 2 months of
Speaker 1: AIDS. Perpetrated by somebody who was a sexual pervert.
Speaker 2: And a sexual psychopath. The man tortured himself to death sexually for goodness sake.
Speaker 1: And ultimately died because of some of that, awful lifestyle he made.
Speaker 2: Right. And yet he becomes the father of the sex education in the class Room now down in in in London, in in the United States, certainly for decades, and and there's no investigation? We tried to get him investigated in 1995 and now it is it it must be done. We've had presidents of, you know, Apologizing for Tuskegee. We've had presidents apologizing for the LSD experiments on our soldiers.
It is time we had apologies at the top level For the torture of thousands of children that became the thing that changed all of our laws and our ways of life.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the judiciary losing public confidence if certain issues are revisited. They highlight the problem of a group of people keeping secrets, compromising the institution. They suggest that it's time for the law to face reality, similar to how churches and other institutions are facing the truth. Another speaker discusses a coup against Australia's Labour Government in 1972, revealing dirty tricks used by intelligence agencies to undermine democracy. The CIA, Britain's MI6, and Australia's own intelligence services, along with a complicit media, played a role in bringing down the government. A slush fund and promises of unlimited funds were used to support opposition parties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The public would lose confidence in the judiciary. He said, we've decided not to revisit that issue because the public would lose confidence in the judiciary. It's not so much the secret that's the problem. It's when a group of people, such as the 28 people on this page, keep each other's secrets that the institution, Going back to my point of the institution becomes compromised. I think it's time, like our, the churches and our other institutions Who are now facing up the truth, I think it's time the institution of the law faced reality.
During the hearing of the case and from the bench from the bench during the case, Said to the Court that he thought the law was out of date and that sex for his siblings should be now legal and that it shouldn't be illegal for men to have sex with children. I think it's time we gave consideration to cleaning up The act.
Speaker 1: The coup against Gough Midland's Labour Government in Australia in 1972 exposes a wide variety of dirty tricks used by intelligence agencies to undermine democracy. In Australia in 1972, a Labour government was elected for the first time in 23 years. It would be brought down in a de facto coup d'etat conducted by the CIA in liaison with Britain's MI6, and most shockingly, Australia's own intelligence services, a complicit Australian media spearheaded by a young local Murdoch, fan the flames of discontent. A slush fund was set up to provide money to both opposition parties via the Nugenhund Bank, a CIA front company. This Was followed up by a promise to the main opposition Liberal Party of unlimited funds.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests including the institution of the law in the terms of reference, presenting disturbing police documents to justify this. These documents name 28 people as alleged pedophiles, including prominent individuals, and were signed off by Gary Crook QC, Counsel assisting an earlier Royal Commission. The speaker refrains from commenting on the Commission's thoughts but mentions that they believed it was beyond their terms of reference. The speaker highlights a compromise at the highest levels in Australia, with a former prime minister being mentioned in the police document.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should include in the terms of reference the institution of the law. And I have documents here which the Royal Commission has seen to justify that case. And in fact, every Attorney General, From Attorney General Ruddock till now has seen some of these documents. And they are they are police documents and, they are very disturbing. So having produced a set of documents to the Royal Commission under an order to produce, which includes, disturbingly, documents that name in 1 document 28 people as alleged pedophiles signed off by Gary Crook QC, Counsel assisting an earlier Royal Commission includes a whole lot of prominent people.
And I think to protect the discretion of the Royal Commission, I won't comment on what the Commission thought except that they thought. It was outside the terms of reference of the Royal Commission. We have in Australia, sadly, a compromise at the highest of levels. There's a former prime minister on this list, and it is a police document.
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the CIA's charter, agents cannot engage in secret operations in the UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand without host government approval. In 1972, Australia elected a labor government, which caused concern for the US due to their withdrawal from Vietnam, support for Palestinian rights, and proposal of an Indian Ocean zone of peace. The possibility of closing American military bases, including Pine Gap, worried the CIA. Australia's Security Intelligence Organization illegally shared dossiers on Labour Party members, union leaders, and peace activists with the CIA. A slush fund was created to provide money to opposition parties, and forged documents were used to implicate Labour Party members in scandals. The Australian media, led by Rupert Murdoch, fueled discontent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to the CIA's charter, agents cannot engage in secret operations of any kind within the countries of the UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand without the explicit prior approval of the host government. In Australia in 1972, a labor government was elected for the first time in 23 years. Kind. Most disturbing to Washington, however, was the withdrawal of Australian troops from Vietnam, the support of Palestinian rights, and the proposal of an Indian Ocean zone of peace.
Speaker 1: Kind. The military industry is the core of the existing manufacturing industry in the US.
Speaker 0: Worst of all, Whitlam kind hinted that he might shut down a number of American military bases, including Pine Gap. When CIA director William Colby con petitioned his counterpart at m I six, sir Maurice Oldfield, for help. He stressed that Australia was traditionally Britain's domain, kind. And that if Pine Gap were closed, the alliance would be blinded strategically.
Speaker 1: 1976. The system Tammy was born followed by Satan.
Speaker 0: Unbeknownst country. Australia's new prime minister, the Australian Security Intelligence Organization, has not only been working closely with the CIA, kind. They have been illegally passing on dossiers concerning every member of the Labour Party as well as union leaders, peace activists, kind and other Australian citizens. A slush fund was set up to provide money to both opposition parties via the Nugelheim Bank, CIA front company. This was followed up by a promise to the main opposition Liberal Party of unlimited funds.
In addition to the slush fund, kind. CIA created a series of forged documents implicating high ranking members of the labor party in a succession of scandals. Kind. No hard evidence was ever produced to substantiate the allegations. But a complicit Australian media spearheaded by a young Wilpert Murdoch kind fan of flames of discontent.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
The Psychopathic Mastermind financed by the Rothschilds His foundations still direct Murder Capitalism and developed Neoliberalism to replace FDR's INTERNATIONAL NEW DEAL with Fascism
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the Rockefellers control major drug companies worldwide, with their representatives in top positions. They aim to control all aspects of biology, from birth to death, including hormones, glands, and genes. The Rockefellers gained control of the medical industry in 1910, leading to the current allopathic system of medicine in the US. Healthcare costs have skyrocketed, making it unaffordable for most Americans. Cancer treatment is particularly expensive, with little promise of a cure. The speaker suggests that these monopolies are interconnected and controlled by a group of elitists known as the world order people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Rock Coast control every major drug company in the world, and now when I say control, I mean, directly. They have among the directors and officials of each of the 18 largest drug companies in the world, they have men from Chase Manhattan Bank, from the Exxon, oil company and so forth, so they're right there. The names I have all the names in my book, Murder by Objection.
Speaker 1: The overall Rockefeller goal? Well, they say in part, quote, science would eventually come to control the fundamental processes of biology. They literally want to control the entire cycle of life from birth to death, everything in between. They wanna control hormones. They wanna control glands.
They wanna control genes. They have no limit to what they attempt to accomplish, and all their funding towards genetic research and more has been part of this goal. As part of their ultimate means of social control and social engineering, eugenics.
Speaker 0: By taking over the medical industry in 1910, through studies which he made through the Carnegie Foundation, John d Rockefeller emerged as the kingpin of the medical monopoly in the United States, and he now presided over an allopathic system of medicine controlled through every legislature by accreditation of hospitals, control of physicians, control of medications, and which is essentially what we have today. So from 1910, when this change was effective, right to the present day, the cost of health care has multiplied astronomically in the United States to the point where it is no longer available to most American citizens. The medical industry, just like any other industry, to they go for the big ticket item, and cancer is a big ticket item. I think the average cost of treating cancer is $120,000, and, the interesting thing about it is when you go to a doctor and you said, oh, you have cancer, and they said, I really can't do anything for you, but I'm gonna give you a lot of treatment. Cost you a lot of money and a lot of pain, your hair is gonna fall out.
You're gonna wish you were dead and sooner or later you will be, but meanwhile, we'll get all your money. This is called cancer treatment in the United States. All of these monopolies interacted, and about the same group of elitists, the world order people, were in each one.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Of the 80,000 chemicals in use, 85% have never been tested for their impact on the human body. Coating the northern hemisphere with these chemicals can affect the development of offspring. The regulatory system is broken, and our chosen chemicals are altering the sexual development of male children. It may take decades to fully understand the consequences. Denial of these issues, like with global warming, is concerning, especially when it affects our own children and grandchildren. Challenging chemical companies in court is difficult due to their FDA approval and safe harbor status. This is seen as a means of social control and engineering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a shocking statistic. Of the 80,000 chemicals in use, 85% of them have never undergone testing for their impact on the human body.
Speaker 1: We have coated the northern hemisphere With chemicals that we know can be transferred from the mother to the offspring and affect how offspring develop. And if we don't reverse The production and the release of these kinds of chemicals, we're gonna see widespread dysfunction among the human population.
Speaker 2: It's about Endocrine disruptors, it's about a regulatory system that's completely broken. It's about the material world that we've decided to build and the chemicals that we've chosen, to build that environment.
Speaker 0: The debate over the safety of man made chemicals will never end. But we will never again live in a world without them. It will be decades before we understand what we've done. But it is already clear that we are permanently altering the sexual development of male children.
Speaker 1: Look how long it's taken The idea of global warming to catch on in society. And we still have large numbers that deny it's happening. That's not scary. That's gonna happen 3 generations down the road. But when you're talking about your own kids Or your grandchildren.
That is something else.
Speaker 3: Good luck winning occasion in the United States court against a $1,000,000,000 chemical company whose products are FDA approved and given are generally recognized as safe harbor status.
Speaker 1: Part of their ultimate means of social control and social engineering, eugenics.
Speaker 3: Then wipe bait them and dress them in fine clothes.
Speaker 1: Have you ever slaughtered a lamb, my king? No. As a lamb sees the knife, she panics.
Speaker 3: You've slaughtered many lambs.
Speaker 1: And none have seen a blade.
Video Transcript AI Summary
John D. Rockefeller played a significant role in shaping the pharmaceutical industry in the US. He classified traditional medicines as alternative when drugs made from petroleum emerged. Rockefeller gained control of the American Medical Association and ensured that only his approved curriculum was taught in medical schools, erasing any mention of natural healing methods. Those who opposed Rockefeller's influence were ostracized, arrested, and silenced. He also founded the American Cancer Society to suppress evidence linking petroleum-based medicines to cancer. As a result, medical errors have become the third leading cause of death in America. The pharmaceutical industry, with its immense lobbying power, holds significant control over laws, policies, and public perception, thanks to Rockefeller's influence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Around the same time that John D. Rockefeller seized US media, he also hijacked US medicine. When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for 1000 of years were suddenly classified as alternative, while the new, petroleum based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities, unscientific quackery.
Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association and began offering massive grants to top medical schools, under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught, any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks. Doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller's plant were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine, those who dared to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, mister Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the the 3rd leading cause of death in America.
This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single largest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as Big O L to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to mister Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than Big Pharma.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mathematical models show that human survival is at risk, with 1 in 3 males in the US now sterile and 1 in 4 women infertile. This decline in fertility is causing concern for the future of our species. Additionally, in 2015, 46% of children in the US were diagnosed with chronic diseases, a significant increase from previous years. The speaker highlights the lack of attention given to these issues by organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health. They also mention the importance of the microbiome in relation to cancer, suggesting that replacing the microbiome could potentially be a solution. However, current cancer treatments still rely on traditional methods like chemotherapy and surgery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mathematical models that we have around human survival. And at our current pace, we've got 1 in 3 males in the United States now sterile, 1 in 4 women infertile, and so you we're losing the ability to procreate as a species. And on our current trajectory, we've got about 70 years left of human life on earth. In the 19 sixties, the entire US population of all ages carried chronic disease diagnosis in four percent of the population. Today, 2015 numbers, we don't have anything more recent than to rely on yet.
But 2015, we see 46% of our children with chronic disease.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I saw that statistic. It's it's shocking. I mean, you you paint a very dystopian, you know, almost Sci fi movie, you know, view on the prognosis of the human race. And just to kind of go back to what we've glossed over very casually a couple moments ago, These infertility rates are insane.
Like, that's really true? That what is it? 1 out of every 4, 1 in 3 men?
Speaker 0: 1 in 4 women are having fertility issues.
Speaker 1: That's something that you don't hear a lot about.
Speaker 0: You would think that might be front and center of something like the Centers For Disease Control the National Institutes of Health. You know, that that might come out of
Speaker 1: the statistics?
Speaker 0: For sure. Yeah. I mean, these are, you know, these are large studies that are screening, problems, like and these are not even new statistics, like polycystic ovarian syndrome, which is the leading cause of infertility in women right now. In the US. In other parts of the world, it's actually chemical toxicity and other things coming into play.
We've known since 2005 with the 1st genetic kind of untangling of the genome of the microbiome. So looking at all the genes of all the different species of bacteria, fungi, parasites, Everything else that lives in your gut. We got snapshots of that very clearly by 2005. By 2010, it was very clear that every cancer that happens in the human body can be correlated with missing some portion of that microbiome. You know, here we are, you know, almost you know, pushing on 15 years later, And nobody in the cancer realm is talking about replacing your microbiome to get rid of your cancer.
They are taking chemo, surgery, radiation. Exact same story that existed in 1968.
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
Anabolic Growth Promoters Use in Meat. https://youtu.be/TmrB2TMxubI?list=PLHSL33o2NTsBHtPka4HUVp4gzXeS9Dhh_ Forks Over Knives: THE CHINA STUDY https://youtu.be/Xvr3vXoKeYw?list=PLHSL33o2NTsBHtPka4HUVp4gzXeS9Dhh_ Red Meat Hormones Cultivating Breast Cancer? https://naturesrealhealth.blogspot.com/2016/08/red-meat-hormones-zeranol-cultivating.html Murder Capitalism https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSL33o2NTsBHtPka4HUVp4gzXeS9Dhh_
Video Transcript AI Summary
An epidemic of breast enlargement in Italian children led to the ban of anabolic growth promoters in Europe. These promoters, like Ziranol, are injected into farm animals to accelerate weight gain. Ziranol is a potent endocrine disruptor, 100,000 times more estrogenic than BPA. Unlike other estrogenic chemicals, Ziranol is intentionally used in human food. Testing people, especially children, before and after consuming meat with these promoters is crucial. Ziranol is as potent as estradiol and DES, synthetic estrogens that have caused health issues. The meat industry uses various additives without considering their toxic effects. DES-treated meat was banned in Europe after causing vaginal cancers. However, the US population consumes hormone residues in meat without any warning or information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An epidemic of breast enlargement was noted in Italian children. Poultry or veal was suspected, given that estrogens may be fed to farm animals to accelerate their weight gain. After this episode, Europe banned the use of anabolic growth promoters in agriculture and has banned the importation of American meat from animals injected with drugs like Ziranol, sold as Ralgro Magnum. Ziranol is one of the most potent known endocrine disruptors a 100,000 times more estrogenic than the plastics chemical BPA, for example. And Xireanol constitutes a special case among potential endocrine disruptors, because in contrast to all other estrogenic endocrine disrupting chemicals, Serinol is present in human food because it's deliberately used, in fact, designed to be a potent, persistent estrogen, whereas the estrogenic properties of the other chemicals is accidental.
Because these anabolic growth promoters in meat production are by far the most potent hormones found in human food, we should really be testing people, especially children, before and after eating this meat. It amazes me that it hasn't been done. Until it has, we have no idea what kind threat they may pose, though the fact that Zeranol is as potent as estradiol, the primary sex steroid in women, and DES should concern us. DES is another synthetic estrogen marketed to pregnant women all pregnant women until 1971, when it was known to cause vaginal cancers in the daughters. But few know it was also used in meat.
In the absence of effective federal regulation, the meat industry uses hundreds of animal feed additives with little or no concern about the carcinogenic and other toxic effects of dietary residues of these additives. The meat industry then promptly switched to other potentially carcinogenic additives, such as Zeranol. When girls started dying from vaginal cancer, DES treated meat was subsequently banned in Europe. Today, virtually the entire US population consumes without any warning, labeling, or information unknown and unpredictable amounts of hormone residues in meat products over a lifetime.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
Video Not Available
youtube.com
Red Meat Hormones, Zeranol, Cultivating Breast Cancer
Nutritional health
naturesrealhealth.blogspot.com
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
70 YEARS OF HUMAN FERTILITY LEFT? COVERUP #2 Food Independence & Planetary Evolution Zach Bush, MD https://youtu.be/X3aOQ0N74PI?list=PLHSL33o2NTsBHtPka4HUVp4gzXeS9Dhh_ The Common Chemicals That Are Making Men Infertile https://youtu.be/vBgalo7ZsAM?list=PLHSL33o2NTsBHtPka4HUVp4gzXeS9Dhh_ Murder Capitalism: ADDICTION Model https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHSL33o2NTsBHtPka4HUVp4gzXeS9Dhh_
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mathematical models show that human survival is at risk, with 1 in 3 males in the US now sterile and 1 in 4 women infertile. This means we are losing the ability to procreate as a species. Additionally, in 2015, 46% of children in the US were diagnosed with chronic diseases, compared to only 4% in the 1960s. These statistics are shocking and dystopian, yet they are not widely discussed. Infertility rates are particularly concerning, with 1 in 4 women experiencing fertility issues. Despite advancements in understanding the microbiome and its correlation with cancer, traditional treatments like chemo, surgery, and radiation are still prioritized over microbiome replacement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mathematical models that we have around human survival. And at our current pace, we've got 1 in 3 males in the United States now sterile, 1 in 4 women infertile, and so you we're losing the ability to procreate as a species. And on our current trajectory, we've got about 70 years left of human life on earth. In the 19 sixties, the entire US population of all ages carried chronic disease diagnosis in four percent of the population. Today, 2015 numbers, we don't have anything more recent than to rely on yet.
But 2015, we see 46% of our children with chronic disease.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I saw that statistic. It's it's shocking. I mean, you you paint a very dystopian, you know, almost Sci fi movie, you know, view on the prognosis of the human race. And just to kind of go back to what we've glossed over very casually a couple moments ago, These infertility rates are insane.
Like, that's really true? That what is it? 1 out of every 4, 1 in 3 men?
Speaker 0: 1 in 4 women are having fertility issues.
Speaker 1: That's something that you don't hear a lot about.
Speaker 0: You would think that might be front and center of something like the Centers For Disease Control the National Institutes of Health. You know, that that might come out of
Speaker 1: the statistics?
Speaker 0: For sure. Yeah. I mean, these are, you know, these are large studies that are screening, problems, like and these are not even new statistics, like polycystic ovarian syndrome, which is the leading cause of infertility in women right now. In the US. In other parts of the world, it's actually chemical toxicity and other things coming into play.
We've known since 2005 with the 1st genetic kind of untangling of the genome of the microbiome. So looking at all the genes of all the different species of bacteria, fungi, parasites, Everything else that lives in your gut. We got snapshots of that very clearly by 2005. By 2010, it was very clear that every cancer that happens in the human body can be correlated with missing some portion of that microbiome. You know, here we are, you know, almost you know, pushing on 15 years later, And nobody in the cancer realm is talking about replacing your microbiome to get rid of your cancer.
They are taking chemo, surgery, radiation. Exact same story that existed in 1968.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
Video Not Available
youtube.com
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
THE ELITE CULT PSYOP: FROM FREEDOM TO FASCISM https://youtu.be/CPpg-AFNsC4?list=PLHSL33o2NTsAnuKasm2WHU3tv26oAjEqe DESTROYING FDR's SAFETY NETS AND THE THREAT OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEW DEAL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Governments used to prioritize meeting people's needs after World War II to prevent the rise of fascism. They ensured economic security and access to public services. However, neoliberalism, led by Thatcher and Reagan, dismantled these social safety nets. This has accelerated recently, creating a dangerous environment where fascism can resurface. Fascists claim to solve problems and fight corruption, but they are supported by the very forces that caused the mess. Without viable alternatives, people may turn to anti-politics, particularly fascism. However, research shows that our dominant characteristics are empathy, altruism, and kindness. We must unite in unprecedented numbers to resist the extreme cult imposing their beliefs on us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the 30 years following the 2nd World War, governments everywhere recognized that to prevent the resurgence of fascism you had to ensure that people's needs were met. You had to ensure that people had economic security, that if they fell out of work, they wouldn't starve, they wouldn't become destitute. You had to ensure that there were good public services so that people's need for health, for education, for all the other things which make for a good life were there. And governments knew that if those things were in place, people would not succumb to the siren call have of fascism and fascism plays on people's desperation. But then with the advance of neoliberalism and have adoption by Thatcher, by Reagan and then by their many imitators around the world, that lesson was forgotten and they ripped apart the social have to net.
They ripped apart public services and now that process is accelerating greatly. And the great danger when happens is that the fascists come back and the fascists say, we're the new broom, we'll sort everything out, we'll sweep away the corruption, we'll solve these intractable problems. Of course, that's another lie because there is no fascist movement ever which has not been supported by the oligarchs, but it pretends otherwise and pretends it's going to save us from the very forces that have caused this mess when actually it's an acceleration of those forces. Have. The danger is that if you don't have real and workable alternatives, then people are going to look around and they're going to turn to an anti politics have some that anti politics is most clearly represented by fascism.
They're constantly trying to tell us you are selfish, you are greedy, and sure, we've all got some selfishness and greediness, but these are not our dominant characteristics. There's a huge body of research showing that our dominant characteristics are empathy and altruism and benevolence and kindness towards other people a community a family are being together with other people and wanting them to have good lives as well as ourselves to have good lives. So we will not stand for this. We must not stand for this. We must gather have in unprecedented numbers to defy this hemmed by a weird, extreme cult to impose their beliefs on us.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
A.I. IS S.A.T.A.N WHY CAPITALISM IS NOW A SCAM INFORMATION IS MONEY ROTHSCHILD NAPOLEONIC WARS https://napoleonbonapartepodcast.com/2006/11/09/the-rothschild-family-and-the-napoleonic-wars/ Dr John Hall: Illegal Surveillance https://youtu.be/I8Sd8Yf2b2s?list=PLHSL33o2NTsDagQRrSfsdDOhzG-qNXnTY BIOFIELD MODULATION TECHNOLOGY CAME OVER WITH🔗NAZIS https://youtu.be/ZL8OqjxwCnw?list=PLHSL33o2NTsDagQRrSfsdDOhzG-qNXnTY&t=5348
Video Transcript AI Summary
Remote neural monitoring, also known as psychotronic weaponry, is a method of interacting with the human nervous system. It allows for the remote monitoring, manipulation, and control of someone's thoughts, emotions, actions, and bodily functions. Another term for this is EEG heterodyning or EEG cloning, which involves receiving and duplicating someone's brain activity to give it to another person. This technology is based on Robert Malek's patent from 1974, which discovered that the brain creates an interference frequency when exposed to two different frequencies. The NSA's monitoring of computer systems is another concerning aspect, especially considering the extreme wealth disparity in the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remote neural monitoring is one of the terms we use for it. The other term is psychotronic weaponry. Weaponry that has been designed to interact with the human nervous system in order to remotely pick up on someone's neural network or EEG and not only receive that and monitor it, but manipulate it and place it back into the victim to control their emotions or control their actions or bodily functions for that matter. The other more recent term we have for that is EEG heterodyning or EEG cloning. The difference between EEG heterodyne and EEG cloning would be, let's say me remotely receiving your EEG and then duplicating it and putting that in another person to give them your same thoughts or feelings or physical reactions.
EEG heterodyning would be receiving your EEG, manipulating it to Put it back inside your head to give us a desired physical reaction or emotional reaction. Robert Duncan worked on some of the projects. I mean, he claims it's a very complex mathematical situation that does it, that it's mostly based on Robert Malek's patent of remote neuromodering in which he found that if you shoot 2 dissimilar frequencies into the human brain that the human brain will actually create an interference frequency as it tries to duplicate the 2 dissimilar frequencies and the interference frequency that gets transmitted back out of your brain can be decoded and your EEG digitally manipulated out of that. Now, and that patent came out in like 1974. It was a M A L E C H, Robert Malec.
And it was actually invented as a way to monitor pilots. That way if you had a pilot that was falling asleep or a pilot that was starting to hallucinate, they could see that remotely. Now, one of the more scary things that's come out is the way the NSA is monitoring our computer systems. We know that the 1% of the world that they, 8 of them have half the wealth in the world.
The Rothschild Family and the Napoleonic Wars - Napoleon
On the last show I briefly mentioned that I had read about various banking families of Europe who profited from the Napoleonic Wars. Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about the Rothschild Family: The basis for the Rothschild fortune was laid during the latter stages of the Napoleonic Wars. From 1813 to 1815, the Rothschild […]
napoleonbonapartepodcast.com
Video Not Available
youtube.com
Video Not Available
youtube.com
@XOPlanetMother - ꧁•⊹٭@𝚇𝙾𝙿𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝙼𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛٭⊹•꧂
Duplessis Orphans MK ULTRA 🔑OPERATION PAPERCLIP NAZI MIND CONTROL FREQUENCIES THE CIA WAS CREATED TO FURTHER THE TECHNOLOGY, SO THEY TORTURED & KILLED CHILDREN https://youtu.be/puXKewhiNeA?list=PLHSL33o2NTsDagQRrSfsdDOhzG-qNXnTY 🔑THIS BIOFIELD MODULATION TECHNOLOGY CAME OVER WITH PAPERCLIP NAZIS https://youtu.be/ZL8OqjxwCnw?list=PLHSL33o2NTsDagQRrSfsdDOhzG-qNXnTY&t=5348
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Canada, a horrifying crime against children occurred for two decades starting in the 1940s. Around 300,000 children, mainly from poor families, were taken by Catholic-like institutions. Many were sold to childless families or on the black market, while others were sent to psychiatric hospitals. These children endured torture, slave labor, electroshock, beatings, drugs, and sexual abuse. The government and the church profited from this. Numerous children died, and a mass grave with over 2,000 human remains was discovered in 1999. Some speculate that pigs may have consumed some of the orphans' remains. Additionally, dead children were allegedly sold to medical schools for autopsies. The survivors still face the false label of being mentally retarded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A horrendous crime against children that almost no one knows about. It reportedly took place in Canada and lasted for 2 decades starting in the 19 forties. 300,000 children became victims. Babies taken from young mothers or kids taken mainly from poor families by Catholic like institutions. The majority of them were sold to childless families or on the black market.
The price varied from $40 per baby up to 25,000. The rest, who bear the name of duplicie orphans, were sent to psychiatric hospitals. Quebec authorities and Catholic orders receive government funding for each child treated in a psychiatric facility. Torture, slave labor, electroshock, beatings, drugs, sex abuse, lobotomies. These children were subjected to the worst things imaginable, while the government and the church made money.
A lot of children died. In the way they were treated after death was no better. In 1999, a mass grave was discovered, 6 boxes with over 2,000 human remains. It was dubbed pig sty cemetery, located next to a pig farm, which raised horrific speculation that pigs might have eaten some of the orphan's remains. Reports suggest dead children were also sold to medical schools for autopsies at $10 her body.
I spoke to a survivor of this shocking policy, du Plessis Orphan, Clarina Duguay, and her husband and activist Rod Vianon. Rod, some horrific events unfolded decades ago in one of the most civilized countries, and almost no one knows about it. We, my team, were shocked to discover this. How is that possible?
Speaker 1: Genocide, the Quebec hospitals were under the rule of the APA, the American Psychiatric Association and the CIA, the duplicity orphans were used at human guinea pigs for medical Experimentations like MK Ultra, more than a 100,000, duplicity Have disappeared or murdered. The aging survivors still carry the false mentally retarded label.
Video Not Available
youtube.com
Video Not Available
youtube.com
reSee.it AI Summary
In this comprehensive article, we delve into various threads and case studies surrounding the pandemic. We explore the censorship on Twitter, the concept of healthy user bias, the impact of vaccinations on nations, the presence of Scientology, the efficacy illusion, and more. Join us as we uncover intriguing details and shed light on different aspects of the #Plandemonium. Stay tuned for updates!
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
2. First, I'll point back to my old thread of threads, so much of which is still censored on Twitter, sigh.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
5. And now for something completely different: #Scientology during the #pandemic.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
1. It is time to explore #Scientology and its strange presence everywhere during the #Plandemonium. First, let us examine the unoriginality of Scientology among occult and UFO cults and religions. https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-unoriginal-mythology-of-scientology
The Unoriginal Mythology of Scientology - Is This Plandemonium?
Cults, Mind Control, and Plandemonium, Part 1
roundingtheearth.substack.com
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
7. The before and after thread of nations that never had epidemics until after vaccines were introduced.
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
10. A #Mindwar thread featuring #5GW, #Scientology, #Bitcoiners, and much more. https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1713934887365882262?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
11. Do you buy the Steve Kirsch Traveling Road Show? https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1711685815057711210?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
12. Malone and Kirsch raise their [own] banners to announce what Malone glossed over Maria Gutschi already pointed out in Brussels in May, which Sasha Latypova suggested was likely the case in 2021. #HeroBall https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1715857609545187382?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
13. National Case Studies of the #Plandemonium. https://x.com/EduEngineer/status/1505815025814052876?s=20
@EduEngineer - Mathew Crawford
It's time to summarize the #NationalPandemicCaseStudies at #RoundingTheEarth The #CampfireWiki is documenting: https://www.campfire.wiki/doku.php?id=rounding_the_earth:pandemic_national_case_studies
Pandemic National Case Studies - Campfire Wiki
campfire.wiki
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the connection between Queer Theory and the advocacy for the decriminalization of pedophilia by its intellectual founders, such as Foucault, Rubin, and Butler. The author questions the lack of denouncement within the community and asks what adherents will do now that these facts have been presented. The author also includes a list of other thread topics for reference.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Professor Derrick Jensen plays Queer Theory Pedophilia Jeopardy with a room full of activists. The dirty little secret adherents of queer theory refuse to acknowledge or ignore, is that the intellectuals who helped create it, Foucault, Rubin, & Butler at the very least, advocated for the decriminalization of pedophilia and saw no problem with it, as you will soon find out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the connection between queer theory and pedophilia, using examples from various queer theorists. They mention Michel Foucault as a prominent figure in queer theory and discuss his views on age of consent laws. The speaker also mentions Gail Rubin as the author of the founding document of queer theory and highlights a defense of pedophilia within that document. They criticize Pat Califia for their views on children's consent and involvement with adults. The speaker concludes by stating their opposition to queer theory and its harmful effects, emphasizing that it is not related to homosexuality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So actually actually, it seems you're acting like this is a spurious connection. So we're gonna play Jeopardy. This is we're gonna play queer theory, we're gonna play queer theory, pedophilia, jeopardy. Okay.
Answer. Commonly called the godfather of queer theory. I don't know who it is. Who is Foucault? Who is Foucault?
I got it. Okay. 100 points. Foucault. Another way to ask this is, who argued no.
I guess the answer would be argued for the eradication of age of consent laws as in down to infants. Who is? Thank you. Okay. Next one.
The author of the the author of the founding document of queer theory. Who is Gail Rubin? Who is Gail Rubin? What percentage? No, no.
The answer is 50%. Question is? The amount in that article that was a defense of pedophilia, specifically, quote, boy lovers. And since you're not believing me, quote quote, this is in the founding document of queer theory. Like communists and homosexuals in 19 fifties, boy lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders of their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
That's in the founding document of career theory. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm using facts. A 1,000,000 apologies. One must never let facts in a way.
Oh, and she also compared, by the way, she compared pedophilia. She compared pedophilia to a preference for spicy food. The thing is, I have never heard of anyone who has to have years of therapy because they ate hot and sour soup. Okay. So up to 200.
Now it is, now it is, now it is pedophilia and queer theory for 300. That would be author of, Macho Sluts. Author of Macho Sluts and Public Sex. Pat Califia. Wait, wait, wait, what was it somebody said?
Stay relevant. Okay. Let's talk let's talk about, Pat Califia. Why do you respond? We can't respond.
Fucking transpo. Who is who is Okay, here's something from one of Pat Califia's books. You know, it's really interesting. It's really interesting that when I actually start talking about the relationship between queer theory and anarchism and pedophilia that, it becomes they really Wanna shut me up now. Yeah.
Sure do. Okay. Hold on. So here's Pat Califia. Cathy, you're a homophobe.
Pat Califia. Oh, wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.
Just a second. Just a second. I was accused of homophobia because I am against pedophilia. Who is it who actually makes the connections between that? Shoes we're looking for.
Okay. Here's something by Pat Califia. Pat Califia has written any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks, or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not. She wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in someone's lap, or engage in sexual activity, by which she does not mean play doctor. She means with adults.
She's very clear about that because she also says that, pedophiles should be more and not less, invested in children's lives. Okay. So we're at 300. 400 is, the most famous, queer theorist of today. Answer.
No, it is not Judith Butler. It's who is Judith Butler. Okay. Judith Butler is the most famous queer theorist of the day. And I have a serious question for everybody who's hating me, in a moment.
Because I have to spell intergeneration correctly. Okay. Okay. So so Judith Butler wrote so I keep adding this qualification. When incest is a so I keep adding this qualification, when incest is a violation, suggesting I think there may be occasions, which is not.
Why would I talk that way? Well, I do think that there are probably forms of incest that are not necessarily traumatic and which or which gain their dramatic character by virtue of the conscious of social saying that they produce. It's Judith Butler. Yeah. It's Judith Butler.
That's one of that's one of the queer heroes. Okay. Now now we have we have, for 500. We have, the last one in the queer theory and pedophilia. The answer is queer theorist who has spoken out strongly against pedophilia.
0. 0. Who is no one? Who is no one? Not a single one.
Because the entire thing is based on transgressing. Yeah. I know. Dear fucking god. Okay.
Okay. The question is the question is okay. The question is okay. So we have, like, 2 minutes left and Do you believe in all theory profiles? Of course not.
What I'm saying is a queer theory promotes pedophilia. Queer theory itself. And I I gave I gave citations from actual queer theorists. Or we could talk about Allen Ginsberg. He has some dreadful lines about how children would get used to our love making if, if only the adults would stay out of it.
Hakim Bey, for god's sake. So my point is my point is this is this is not queer theory, I think, is really and thank you for asking respectfully. You would wanna ask. Right? Yes.
I think queer theory is is a really harmful philosophy. And I wanna be really clear that to do with homosexuality. Yeah. It has nothing to do with homosexuality. And It emerged in the 19 eighties, really, as a response to, a lot of, especially lesbian feminist ideas.
And it also emerged through postmodernism, which we can talk about or not if you want. But the point is that, I think that it is it is a mistake to some of the strongest opponents of queer theory of lesbians. And there are also a lot not as many, but there are a large number of of gay men who are very strongly opposed to queer theory. On that,
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Foucault is largely credited as laying down the roots of Queer Theory that would fully form in the 80’s with the work of Gayle Rubin. While on his deathbed, dying of AIDS he said the following: “To die for the love of boys: what could be more beautiful?” https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/2021/12/michel-foucault-as-a-moral-monster/
Michel Foucault as a Moral Monster - Quadrant Online
Michel Foucault's rapacious appetite for small boys should greatly disconcert proponents of cancel culture, of which he might well be described as a founding father. Will they demand the burning of his books, or will they reveal their true colours and apply the excuse of the blind eye to one of their own? On well established form, the answer to that question is self-evident
quadrant.org.au
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Gayle Rubin in her essay “Thinking Sex” which is considered a foundational text of Queer theory lends a sympathetic ear to “boy-lovers” aka pedophiles. Full Text: faculty.umb.edu/heike.schotten… https://t.co/Rf5X3nPE5I
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Judith Butler, a messianic figure in the world of Queer Theory wrote in her book “Undoing Gender” the following in a chapter called “Quandaries of the Incest Taboo”. According to her in certain situations incest may not be a “violation”. https://t.co/x0uz6qg9pI
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
All we continually get from this community is denial and hostility for pointing out basic historical facts and asking questions about the intellectual roots of this ideology. How can one take it seriously if the progenitors of it advocate for or have participated in immoral acts that are aimed at children. It would be one thing if we were seeing wide scale denouncements of these ideas. However, thus far we have heard nothing of the sort which can only be interpreted as an explicit endorsement. So I ask adherents, now that you have heard and seen the sobering facts, what will you do?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you’ve found this post valuable please consider giving me a follow so you don’t miss them in the future, like these 👇🏻
reSee.it AI Summary
David Reimer's tragic story sheds light on the origins of gender identity. Psychologist John Money's theory, taught in schools, was based on his experiment with David, who was forced to undergo sex reassignment surgery. Money's abuse included taking nude photos of David and his brother in sexual positions. Despite the experiment's failure, Money publicized it as a success, leading to David and his brother's suicides. This ideology is tearing families apart and must be opposed on a mass scale.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Thread The Shocking Origin Of Gender Identity A cautionary tale the world has ignored. What you are about to watch is deeply disturbing and unbelievably sad. In 2000 David Reimer went on Oprah to detail the horrors inflicted on him by Psychologist John Money, the man who invented the concept of Gender Identity. He appeared for the first time publicly on the Oprah Winfrey show to expose what had been done to him.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is the story of David, known as Jon Joan in medical journals, and his mother Janet. Janet made the difficult decision to change David's sex and raise him as a girl. They discuss the challenges they faced and the doubts they had throughout the process. David never felt like he fit in as a girl and struggled to conform to societal expectations. Janet tried to convince him that it was okay to be himself, but David felt lonely and desperate to fit in. Ultimately, David realized that he couldn't change who he was and accepted himself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For years, this case was called a medical triumph, but in truth, the case was a failure, devastating the lives of just about everybody involved. This is David who has remained anonymous until now, only known in the medical journals as Jon Joan. And this is Janet Rymer, David's mother, who made the agonizing decision to change the sex of her son and to raise him as a girl. And what you all at home didn't see during the taping of that piece, we could tell, Janet, you were, you know, moved and probably disturbed by what you're saying. And, David, you you comfort
Speaker 1: her. It's,
Speaker 2: she's hurting right now. Mothers are All over the world, we're all alike. There's guilt. It's darned if you do and darned if you don't. Mhmm.
You know? With things that were done were done out of compassion, Out of love for your child? Mhmm. How can I hate my mother for that? Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Did you think he would hate you?
Speaker 1: Yes, I did. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Did you hate yourself?
Speaker 1: Yes. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: So you talk on the tape about the day you first put the dress on. Did you have agonizing feelings about it even when the doctor or were you of that generation or the kind of person when the doctor said this would be best. Did you all believe that it
Speaker 1: would be best? Yes. I had complete faith in the doctor. Mhmm. I believed it would be best, But when he started to rip it off, I started to have doubts.
And during the whole Journey of trying to create a feminine being. There were doubts along the way, But I couldn't afford to contemplate them because I couldn't afford to be wrong. I couldn't face
Speaker 0: the alternative. And the alternative being what? That you'd made this horrible mistake?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Because then what could you do?
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Since you since your earliest memories, you never felt like you were a boy a girl?
Speaker 2: I never quite fit in. Well, the girls would do their things with their Barbies and things like that, and That wouldn't interest me.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And, things such as trucks and, building forts And, you know, getting into the odd fist fight and climbing trees. That's the kind of stuff that I like, but it was unacceptable, so I'd never As
Speaker 0: a girl?
Speaker 2: As as a girl, I had no place to to fit in.
Speaker 1: So what would you
Speaker 0: say to, David, who was then your what would you say to him when he would act out his maleness?
Speaker 1: I would try and convince him that he was doing it because he was a tomboy
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And that it was okay to be himself or herself, I would say, at the time. It was okay to be herself, but she was very much a tomboy. Mhmm.
Speaker 2: I tried to fit in.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: I I tried with the with the makeup, and it it Turned out to be a disaster. I mean, you got the, you know, the the red the red circles on the cheeks and, look I looked like a clown, basically.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 2: And, but I didn't do it because I liked it. I did it because I wanted so desperately to fit in because I was so lonely, And I let 1 boy kiss me on my cheek once, and I thought about it. Said, no. I don't like this. No.
That's it. I can't help that. You know? I am what I am.
Speaker 0: Did you feel you you when you say I am what I am, but you didn't know what that was?
Speaker 2: I wasn't here.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
In the end, the burden imposed upon David proved too much and he took his life in a grocery store parking lot with a single shotgun blast to the head. His twin brother Brian also committed suicide. With this in mind let’s look at the man behind this tragedy, John Money.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On May 4th, 2004, David Reimer, 38, tragically took his own life in a supermarket car park. The police arrived at his door around 10:30 at night, and despite his desperate pleas, he ended his life by shooting himself with a shotgun.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On May 4th 2004. 38 year old David Reimer drove into a supermarket car park.
Speaker 1: 10:30 at night, the police came to the door. I think I was screaming no. No. No.
Speaker 0: As he sat in his car, He put a shotgun to his head and pulled the trigger.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Not knowing what to do with her son who had experienced a horrific circumcision, David’s mother turned to John Money after seeing him on TV.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Plastic surgery couldn't help Bruce Reimer, but then the Reimer family saw hope in a TV show featuring Dr. John Money, a pioneer in sex change surgery. Dr. Money, charismatic and confident, had brought a transsexual woman who had undergone the procedure. This gave the Reimers hope, and they reached out to Dr. Money. He suggested turning their baby son into a girl, and it seemed like the solution they were looking for. However, it wasn't just the Reimers who needed Dr. Money's help; he saw them as an answer to his own prayers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the time, plastic surgery was not advanced enough to help Bruce Reimer.
Speaker 1: Only a few weeks ago, Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore announced it was opening a gender identity clinic expressly for people who wanted to change their sex. Doctor John Money, a psychologist
Speaker 0: Then several months later, The Reimer family saw something on television that made them feel hopeful for the first time since the accident.
Speaker 1: Doctor Money
Speaker 0: Doctor John Money, originally from New Zealand, was a pioneer in the astonishing new field of sex change surgery.
Speaker 2: Doctor Money, it's still a pretty drastic procedure, isn't it? Well,
Speaker 1: it's a drastic procedure by your standards and mine.
Speaker 2: Your money was on there, and he was very charismatic. He was very he seemed very highly intelligent and very Confident of what he was saying.
Speaker 0: Doctor Money had brought a transsexual with him. A man who had been changed into a woman. As a
Speaker 2: matter of fact, You've never been in it? The transsexual certainly made an impact because she was a very Feminine seeming woman. And I thought, Here's our answer, here's our salvation, here's our hope.
Speaker 0: Janet wrote to doctor Money after the show ended. He replied promptly. When they met, Doctor Money suggested that the Reymers could turn their baby son into a baby girl. It looked as if Ron and Janet had solved the problem. But it wasn't just that doctor Money was the answer to the rymer's prayers.
They were the answer to his.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Indeed Money’s prayers were answered in the form of the twins. He needed a way to prove his theory, the same theory being taught in schools as if it is a scientifically proven fact. The theory of Gender Identity.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Money believed that a baby's upbringing determines their gender identity more than their genes. He based this theory on his research with intersex individuals, who have both male and female physical characteristics. However, some argued that this theory might not apply to all children due to hormonal differences in the womb. To prove his hypothesis, Dr. Money needed two ordinary boys for an experiment: one would be raised as a girl, and the other would remain a boy. This opportunity arose with the Rhymer twins.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Money had developed a radical new theory about nature versus nurture and how these twin forces affect whether we think of ourselves as a girl or a boy. He thought that while genes are important, as far as its gender is concerned, a baby is essentially neutral for the 1st 2 years of life. During these critical 2 years, the child's upbringing, how it is nurtured, will determine whether it feels masculine or feminine. Doctor Money had developed this theory from his research with hermaphrodites, people now known as intersex who are physically both male and female. I have some very fascinating pairs of cases that have taught me a lot and of course, have taught other people a lot Indirectly too.
But intersex children are not necessarily the same as other children. They receive different amounts of hormones in the womb. So some argued that doctor Money's hypothesis might not be true for all children. To prove that nurture is more important than nature would require an extraordinary experiment. Doctor Money needed 2 ordinary boys.
1 would be raised as a girl. The other would remain a boy. Doctor Money now had the perfect opportunity. The Rhymer twins.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Money conducted many sessions with David and the subsequent recordings were released detailing what was discussed. Early on Money learned that David was not accepting of the identity imposed on him.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Money used the original transcripts of interviews to support his theory that a boy could be raised as a girl successfully. In one session, he asked who the boss was, and Brian, the boy, was identified as the boss. When asked if he fought back, Brian said yes, while Brenda, the girl, said no because girls don't fight back. Doctor Money's theory gained attention worldwide, suggesting that nurture was more important than nature in determining gender identity. However, the Reimer family, whose daughter underwent a sex change, was unaware of Doctor Money's claims. Brenda exhibited masculine behavior, contradicting the supposed success of the gender change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Horizon has used the original transcripts of these interviews. This is what really happened, and these are the actual words doctor Money and the children used. In this session, doctor Money's theory seemed to be working.
Speaker 1: Tell me, which one of you is the boss?
Speaker 2: Brian is the boss because he is a boy.
Speaker 1: Brian, are you the boss?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: The boys start to fight. Do you fight back or do you run away?
Speaker 2: I fight back.
Speaker 1: I guess Brenda fights back too sometimes. Do you, Brenda?
Speaker 2: Nope. Because I'm a girl.
Speaker 3: You're a girl.
Speaker 2: I'm not a boy. Girls don't fight back, do they? Girls can't hit very hard but boys can.
Speaker 0: In 1972, when Brenda Rimer was 7 years old, Doctor Money announced to the world how successful his theory was, that a boy, if given the correct upbringing, could be turned into a girl.
Speaker 3: Her behavior as a little girl is in remarkable contrast to the little boy behavior of her identical twin brother. Doctor Money's book,
Speaker 0: Man and boy, woman and girl was reviewed all over the world.
Speaker 3: The girl wanted and received for Christmas dolls, A dollhouse and a doll carriage, clearly related to the maternal aspect of the female adult role.
Speaker 0: Doctor Money's idea became known as the theory of gender neutrality. It seemed to be proof of one of the great issues in science. As far as gender identity was concerned, nurture was more important than nature.
Speaker 1: It makes it very exciting, don't you think, to live in an age of of discovery of human personality this way?
Speaker 0: But back in Canada, the Reimer family were unaware that doctor Money was triumphantly describing their daughter's sex change as a Success Life was rather different for the Reymers. Brenda was behaving in a distinctly masculine manner.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Not to be deterred and fixated on his demented theory Money moves forward and did so in a way many would consider inappropriate to say the least.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Before publicizing Brenda's case, there were concerns about potential problems.
Speaker 1: Brenda showed extreme negativism and aggression during her visits. Doctor Money attempted to make her accept her new gender by discussing the differences between male and female genitalia.
Speaker 2: Doctor Money asked Brenda intimate questions to help her understand the distinction between boys and girls.
Speaker 3: The questions were explicit and made me uncomfortable. However, some argue that focusing on genitalia was scientifically correct at the time.
Speaker 2: Knowing a child's gender based on their genital appearance is important and commonly used clinically.
Note: The concise transcript is within the 150-word limit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even before he publicized Brenda's case as a success, he was aware that there could be some problems.
Speaker 1: From this evidence and others, I would say there's not much chance of talking this girl into a change of mind. This negativism was the most extreme she displayed on this visit. Last time, she was almost maniacal in the way she hit, kicked and otherwise attacked people are not altogether a playful manner.
Speaker 0: According to doctor Money's theory, But it is possible to raise a boy as a girl. Brenda needed to believe that she was female. So the year after his book was published, doctor Money tried to make her accept her new gender by focusing on the difference Between a girl's and a boy's genitalia. He began by asking her a series of intimate questions.
Speaker 1: Now I've got a good question for you. What? How do you tell the difference between a boy and a girl?
Speaker 2: Well, a girl has long hair and a boy has short hair.
Speaker 1: What if I have short hair and you have short hair?
Speaker 2: Well, I I have a dress and you have pants.
Speaker 1: Yes, there could be a way, but there is another way. What? Take their clothes off. What about a baby when it has no clothes on? How can you tell whether it's a boy or a girl?
Speaker 2: I don't
Speaker 1: know. Well, I'll help you. You have a look down here between the legs. Right? How is a girl and how is a boy down there?
What is the difference?
Speaker 2: Relax.
Speaker 1: A boy has a penis for peeing through, like a little sausage, What does a girl have?
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 1: She has it flat. A boy doesn't have that. They're both different. They're both different.
Speaker 3: The top of questions that we were asked were sexual in nature to the point where it'd make me blush, if I would think of talking that way about to my to my son, I'd be very embarrassed. It is very explicit. But the sexual parts
Speaker 0: There is no doubt that Brenda found doctor Money's approach Distressing. But his supporters argue that focusing on genitalia was a scientifically correct procedure at the time.
Speaker 2: It's a very important issue with children to know whether they are boys or girls or male or female by the appearance of their genitalia. I mean, this is the insignia, if you will, that distinguishes boys and girls. And it's very commonly used clinically. Certainly, I do as well.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Money became more and more inappropriate showing a 7 year old photos of woman giving birth to show “Brenda” what female genitalia was. Not only that he found it appropriate to discuss sex reassignment surgery with the child making him very uncomfortable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Brenda was shown explicit birth photos to make her understand her gender, which shocked her as a young child. Doctor Money then tried to convince her to have surgery to construct a vagina, but Brenda was uncomfortable with the idea. She was told that the surgery would fix her genitalia and make it easier for her to pee. Brenda was scared and didn't understand why she needed surgery when she felt perfectly fine. She believed that the surgery would change her for the worse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To try and make Brenda understand that she was a girl, doctor Money showed her a book called 2 births. It contained explicit photographs of women giving birth and was clearly shocking for a young child.
Speaker 1: I thought he was perverted. I thought he was a sick man. My parents didn't know a lot that was going on. And if they would've known, that would never would've happened.
Speaker 0: With Brenda still resisting her female gender, doctor Money then had to adopt a more extreme approach. He thought that the only way he could make Brenda accept a feminine identity would be if her rudimentary vulva looked more like a normal girl's genitalia. He therefore tried to persuade her to have a vagina constructed. Brenda, however, was clearly uncomfortable with the idea of having surgery.
Speaker 2: And that reminds me of something else I want to tell you about. You know already the way you're made down there. You're not exactly the same as other girls. Well, I have a message for you about Here at the hospital, we can fix it up and make it look like it's supposed to be. Fix it up so that when you sit down to pee, it goes straight down the bowl instead of How would you be when you're ready for that?
Speaker 0: I don't know.
Speaker 1: How old are
Speaker 2: you now? 7. Well, maybe if you feel okay by the time you're 8 years old, we can let the doctor in the white coat have a look down there. He's the one who do the operation to fix it up. Last year, a man had a look down there.
Maybe next year, it'll be okay to let the other doctor have a look down Why don't fix it up?
Speaker 0: Why would I do that?
Speaker 2: You don't have to if you don't want to. When would be a good age for the operation? 13. 13? I'll see about that.
Might be a bit late.
Speaker 0: Although the theory behind the operation made sense, Brenda was horrified at the prospect.
Speaker 1: I was scared to death. I figured, you know, I was perfectly fine. My my heart was fine. Nothing old with my kidneys. What do I need surgery for?
And I I thought Deep down inside, that if I went through this surgery, it would change me somehow for the worse.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The abuse grew even more vile when Money made David and his brother pose nude in sexual positions so that he could take photographs. The photographs are said to be held at the Kinsey Institute and have never been allowed release.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 instructs someone to undress and points out the difference between Brian and the listener. Speaker 1 acknowledges being flat-chested. Speaker 2 shares that they were forced to undress and have photos taken when their parents weren't around. They suspect that these incidents may be documented in files held by doctor Money. Speaker 1 suggests that if these incidents occurred, they may be in files that doctor Money refuses to release. Speaker 2 confirms having personal files buried, including photos taken while nude. Speaker 1 mentions that the family was unaware of doctor Money's behavior, and the twins only disclosed their experiences as adults. Speaker 0 expresses horror upon learning about doctor Money's actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take your clothes off now. Good. What's the difference? Look down there. What does Brian have?
A penis. Right. And what do you have?
Speaker 1: Flat is flat.
Speaker 0: That's right. That's how you know you're a girl. Stay here. I'm gonna take a couple of photographs. Don't move.
Speaker 2: When my folks weren't around, well, then, we did what we were told, and if we didn't, then We got yelled at to the point where we thought we're gonna get backhanded. If we were told to take our clothes off, Well, eventually, we took our clothes off and sat on the couch, had photos of us taken.
Speaker 1: If this incident took place, It may have been reported in files that doctor Money gave to the Kinsey Institute and which he will not allow to be released.
Speaker 2: I have 2 years of my files that are buried, and those are the same files where I was on the couch, nude, getting photographed into positions. So he can sit there and pin himself Rosie all he wants. I know better.
Speaker 1: If doctor Mani did indeed behave like this, The family were unaware. The twins only revealed their experiences when they were adults.
Speaker 0: David told us what doctor Mani had done long after we I had stopped seeing him, and we were horrified. We thought, how could this happen to children?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
By the time David was thirteen Money started pressuring him to have the surgery, something David was adamantly opposed to. Money even brought in an adult Transgender person to help him convince David. This was David’s last session with Money.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Money concluded the interview by discussing the concept of gender identity. He acknowledged that it can be difficult for individuals to talk about their gender identity, whether they identify as male or female, boy or girl, or man or woman. Many people have come to his office with similar feelings, unable to discuss this important aspect of their lives. Dr. Money assured the person being interviewed that he would be the one person in the world they could confide in.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happened next as doctor Money concluded their interview? I wanna tell you one more thing. When you talk about your identity, be male or female, boy or girl, man or woman, That's called your gender identity, and that's a very, very tough thing for you to talk about. Now I've had not just a few but many people come into this office with exactly the same feelings as you have. There's something you you cannot talk about and yet it's the most important thing in your life.
Are we finished? Thanks for talking. I want you to know I'm gonna be the 1 person in the world you can tell anything to.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Unbeknownst to David and his family even though Money knew his experiment and theory proved to be an utter failure, he began publicizing it as a resounding success. Academia as well as the press gushed over what they believed to be a successful transition. This angered David and he went public. The publicity eventually led to both David and his brother Brian’s death via suicide.
Video Transcript AI Summary
David and Brian, twins who were subjects of a controversial experiment by Dr. Money, decided to speak out against him after realizing he had falsely portrayed their case as a success. They wanted to prevent others from going through the same trauma. The experiment involved inappropriate sexual positions and taking pictures of them when they were just 7 years old. However, after the documentary was aired, Brian's mental health worsened. David visited him frequently, trying to provide support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then something happened that would have a terrible effect on both twins. David discovered that doctor Money had continued to publicize his case as a success, proof that you could raise a boy as a girl.
Speaker 1: And I was appalled, disgusted, and angry when I heard about it because there was nothing further than the truth. You're a cute little boy.
Speaker 0: 3 decades after this misguided experiment began To prevent others being traumatized in the same way, David persuaded Brian to go public with him and speak about their ordeal. David said we have to do this and stop doctor Manny from doing what he's doing. He's ruined our lives. We can't let him loo ruin anymore. So Brian agreed
Speaker 1: The experiments that he made us do, going into sexual positions with no clothes on, taking pictures of us. How degrading For 7 year old.
Speaker 0: But once the documentary was broadcast, Bryan's mental health deteriorated.
Speaker 1: In a quarter? David used to come here quite often, bring him flowers And I guess I don't know exactly what he talked about but he came here and he talked to him Quite a few times. It must have been at least 4 or 5 times a week.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
To this day John Money is praised and lionized by advocates of this pernicious ideology based on a theory proven to be fraudulent and yet here we are. What you have just learned is the truth and mustn’t be ignored any longer. This ideology is ripping families apart and tearing at the fabric of society itself. Unless good people stand up and oppose this on a mass scale, it will subsume everything, leaving broken children and families in its wake, just as it did with patient zero, David Reimer.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you would like to learn more about this history, I wrote an article about it here. https://www.thepublica.com/transgenderism-went-mainstream-now-its-coming-for-our-children/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Finally, if you’ve found this information valuable please consider giving me a follow so you can catch more threads in the future like these. 👇🏻 https://t.co/DPSWDdMVt9
reSee.it AI Summary
The Kinsey Institute, initially funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, has had a significant impact on sexual education and the law. It promoted the idea that children are sexual beings from birth, which has influenced sex education and the treatment of sexual offenders. The researchers obtained data from a serial pedophile, and the institute's former directors have been linked to pedophilia. The institute's association with Aleister Crowley and Luciferianism is concerning. Recently, Indiana eliminated taxpayer funding for the institute. The institute's history should be investigated, and its curriculum should be removed from schools. It's important to challenge this controversial institution and its influence on society.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
🚨WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT🚨 Thread 🧵 Alfred Kinsey and his Institute Unmasked The Kinsey Institute initially called The Institute for Sex Research was founded in 1947 with a $40,000 grant to Kinsey by the National Research Council’s Committee for Research on the Problems of Sex which was a project of the notorious Rockefeller Foundation. It is hard to overstate the importance of the Kinsey Institute had on the country in relation to sexual education, the law and the culture at large. It is portrayed in the media as a groundbreaking scientific institution, even today and has morphed from a non-profit to being endorsed by the United Nations and being fully integrated into the University of Indiana’s educational system where it resides today. As is usually the case with the media, we have been lied to about the institutions dark past, as you will soon find out. This is a story that is becoming all too familiar, men of “science” conducting horrific experiments on a population in the name of “progress” while the media and government runs cover for their evil deeds in order to ensure a future source of prestige, influence and profits. Always at the expense of innocent people. What you are about to learn is disturbing beyond comprehension made all the more salient with the knowledge that the reusing “research” has been codified within our culture. #kinsey
Video Transcript AI Summary
In June 1944, Alfred Kinsey met with a man named Rex King, also known as Mr. Green, who became his main source of information about child sexuality. Mr. Green had a strong interest in sex and had engaged in sexual activities with men, women, children, and animals. He had even abused his own family members and recorded the details in diaries. Kinsey saw this as a valuable opportunity to gather unique data for his research. Despite Mr. Green's predatory behavior, Kinsey worked with him and encouraged him to document his abuse in a scientific manner. They met secretly in Arizona, and Kinsey convinced Mr. Green to retrieve his buried diaries. Kinsey believed that this information would contribute to scientific knowledge about a subject that was poorly understood at the time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In June 1944, Alfred Kinsey left Indiana on an 1800 mile trek across the southwestern United States. He was going to a clandestine meeting with a man who was to become his prime source of information about child sexuality.
Speaker 1: This individual was, I suppose you might say sex, his interest in sex was his main hobby in life. Anything was was a sexual object for him. He was interested in having sex with Men, women, and children, and animals, and he just was curious to see what would happen.
Speaker 2: His first sexual contact was over at intercourse with his grandmother. His, he had looked up his family tree. There were 30, I forget how many. 33 or 38 members. He had had almost all of them.
He had had intercourse with 100 upon 100 of males and females of every conceivable age. My memory is that it's exceeded 600 for both boys and girls, and we haven't yet got to maturity.
Speaker 0: The man was a US government land examiner called Rex King. To protect him, Kinsey gave him the code name, mister Green. His job took him across Arizona and New Mexico, Trips he used to prey on children. He molested at least 800 boys and girls recording the details in explicit handwritten diaries Kinsey was told about green by his own mentor sex research doctor. Robert Dickinson Dickinson had collaborated with the pedophile for several and taught him how to record his child abuse in scientific detail.
Speaker 1: He told him how to measure things and time things and Encouraging him to he knew he was going to do his, ordinary behavior anyway. Dickinson couldn't have stopped him From being a pedophile. But he said, at least you ought to do the you know, do something scientific about it so there'll be It won't be just your jollies. It'll be something worthwhile to say. So he gave him some training by a letter and correspondence.
Speaker 3: Experimented with baby, penis 1.7 inches by 3 inches, Stiff immediately. Frobs in 3.5 minutes. Greene's
Speaker 0: diaries were a highly incriminating record 20 years of sexual abuse But Kinsey was tantalized by the prospect of so much unique data
Speaker 3: I congratulate you on the research spirit which has led you to collect data over these many years. Everything that you've accumulated must find its way into scientific channels.
Speaker 4: Kinsey worshiped
Speaker 3: data. Anyone who could
Speaker 4: Material. He saw it as a gold mine,
Speaker 3: as a scientific gold mine, that would provide information, in an
Speaker 4: area about which science knew very, very little.
Speaker 0: Kinsey met Greene at a secret location in Arizona. Because of the illegal nature of their contents green and buried many of his diaries in the desert Kinsey persuaded him to retrieve them and pass them on to him green had been a predatory child molester for more than 20 years so why did Kinsey agree to work with him Clarence Tripp was one of Kinsey's closest associates. Even today, he defends Kinsey's involvement with the pedophile.
Speaker 2: Greene was actually extremely conservative in all kinds of ways, and we know that for sure because he had, You know, you can get into trouble in a flash if you have any kind of, even, tickling, any kind of sexual contact Whatsoever, with a child because all you need is one whimper out of the child. You don't even need a formal charge To put you in the jailhouse. Well, here's this man with hundreds of contacts. There was never a charge against him. He was never arrested for anything.
All the children thought he was wonderful. All the mothers thought he was wonderful. There are 2, I suppose, lest you get contradicted, there are 2 instances in which a young boy or girl, a girl, I guess he was, I don't remember, Didn't complain. They agreed to the sexual contact, but then they found it very Painful and yelled out when it actually took place. This was because they were very young and had small genitalia, and Greene was a grown man with enormous genitalia.
And there was a fit prob
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The data provided by a serial pedophile was used to justify the notion that everything we had known about children and sexuality had been wrong. https://t.co/3N6jfOlP7x
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over a span of 3 years, Kinsey and Greene maintained regular correspondence. In 1948, Kinsey published parts of Greene's diaries in his groundbreaking book on human sexuality. Instead of acknowledging Greene's admission of being a child abuser, Kinsey presented the diaries as the initial scientific evidence that children are sexual beings from birth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the next 3 years, Kinsey corresponded regularly with Greene. In 1948, he would publish large sections of Greene's diaries in his first revolutionary book on human sexuality. But rather than presenting them as the claims of a self confessed child abuser, Kinsey put them forward as the first ever scientific proof that children were sexual beings from birth
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
It introduced the idea that children are sexual being from the moment they were born. https://t.co/Fgi1xKzs6Q
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1948, Alfred Kinsey's book "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" gained popularity. However, Chapter 5 contained disturbing content from pedophile diaries provided by Mr. Green. Without verification, Kinsey published explicit descriptions of the orgasms experienced by the children Green claimed to have abused. These descriptions included violent convulsions, crying, and protests from the children. Green also claimed to have conducted experiments on the age at which boys could achieve orgasm, masturbating 317 infants and children. Kinsey reproduced these claims without any independent verification. He even stated that children could enjoy sexual activity from birth with the help of an experienced adult, contradicting previous scientific knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When in 1948 alfred Kinsey's sexual behavior in the human male became an instant bestseller no one seemed to notice the contents of chapter 5 in it Kinziri produced sections of the pedophile diaries he had received from mister Green First and with no independent corroboration he published verbatim greens detailed descriptions of what the pedophile claimed were orgasms experienced by the hundreds of children he had abused
Speaker 1: Extreme tension with violent convulsion often involving the sudden heaving and jerking of the whole body. Groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears, especially among younger children.
Speaker 2: If you read those words, what he's talking about is kids who are screaming, Kids who are protesting in every way they can the fact that their bodies, that their persons are being violated. The individual in question, I think, harmed, in serious ways, A large number of young people.
Speaker 0: Greene had also carried out what he claimed were scientific experiments and to determine the age of which boys were first capable of orgasm For the experiment he masturbated 317 infants and children from 2 months to 15 years old recording which ones achieved what he interpreted as orgasms Kinsey reproduced this as table 31 In table 32 he laid at the time it had taken green to bring each of these children to these so called orgasms green also claimed that his experiments proved that given sufficient adult stimulation some of the boys were capable of multiple orgasms again with no way of checking the claims Kinsey simply reproduced them a scientific fact finally in table 34 Kinsey set out Greene's notes on the time it had taken him to masturbate the children to multiple orgasms.
Speaker 1: The average interval between the first and second climaxes Ranged from less than 10 seconds to 30 minutes or more. Even the youngest males as young as 5 months in age are capable of such repeated reactions.
Speaker 0: The table suggested that some children, including a 4 year old boy, had been masturbated over a 24 hour period. In his book and based primarily on Greene's information Kinsey claimed that children could with the assistance of an experienced adult but enjoy sexual activity from the moment they were born. It was a revolutionary claim that overturned all previous scientific knowledge about the development of
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This sick notion has had profound effects on sex education and the law as it pertains to sexual offenders. https://t.co/HK9zXwIdez
Video Transcript AI Summary
Based on Kinsey's data, researchers developed a theory of child sexuality that has influenced laws against molestation and the way sex education is taught. Kinsey did not openly endorse pedophilia, but he provided a scientific basis for it. He believed that adult-child sexual relations were mainly seen as problematic due to parental and authoritative overreaction. Kinsey also suggested that young boys needed the guidance of older individuals to develop effective sexual techniques. He recorded that sexual contact between adults and young girls could be pleasurable for the girls and contribute to their socio-sexual development. Kinsey's coauthor, Wardell Pomeroy, mentioned the possibility of loving sexual relationships between children and animals in his book on sex education.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Based on the Kinsey data, sex researchers formulated a theory of child sexuality that's influenced everything from laws against molestation to how and when sex education is taught. Few professionals would disagree that doctor Kinsey has been the most influential figure in the study of sex, particularly the concept of child sexuality.
Speaker 1: He did not openly promote pedophilia, but he the, quote, scientific, unquote, basis for it. He felt the main problem with adult child sexual relations was hysteria and overreaction on the part of parents and authorities. He believed that young boys needed the help of Older people to develop effective sexual techniques, and he recorded that adult sexual contacts with young girls are a source of pleasure to these girls and may lead to better socio sexual development in their later lives. His coauthor Wardell Pomeroy, a prominent sexologist, Has written that the Kinsey research uncovered, quote, many beautiful and mutually satisfying relationships between fathers and daughters. Pomeroy also in his sex education book, boys and sex, refers to the possibility of, Quote, loving sexual relationships, unquote, between children and animals.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Kinsey believed that since children are sexual beings at birth that they are endowed with the right to experience sex at any age. This was found to be an absurd proposition and many opposed it at the time. https://t.co/bGiRWfFPK1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kinsey perception challenges laws protecting children from sexual exploitation. A Florida judge recently threw out cases under statutory rape laws, stating that minors under 16 have a constitutional right to engage in sexual activity. Courts have also ruled that parents cannot stop schools from distributing condoms to their children. This philosophy of child autonomy in sexual decisions is eroding legal protections for children. Scientists believe an inquiry into the Kinsey Institute is necessary, with Walter Stewart expressing concerns about research fraud and ethical violations. Stewart's letter to the Canadian Medical Journal calls for investigation based on compelling evidence from Kinsey's own book.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Kinsey perception of the right of children to have sex at any age has resulted in challenges to laws protecting children from sexual exploitation.
Speaker 1: In Florida recently, a state court judge threw out several cases that have been brought under the statutory rape laws. Citing privacy grounds, the judge found that minors under the age of 16 had a constitutional right to engage in sexual activity. Several courts have recently held that parents do not have a right to stop school districts from handing out condoms to their children. Again, you you see in school districts, in courts, in the media, the McKinsey philosophy that children should be free and autonomous to decide for themselves what sort of sexual activity, what sort of sexual behavior they should engage in Without any kind of regulation or restriction from the state or their parents, has begun to chip away at The protections that our legal system had previously provided to to children.
Speaker 0: Some scientists feel that an inquiry of the Kinsey institute is long overdue.
Speaker 2: I have been in contact with perhaps the best known fraud specialist in this country Over a period of years concerning this Kinsey, perhaps the best known fraud specialist in this country, Over a period of years concerning this Kinsey, research fraud allegation, the person I'm referring to, of course, is Walter Stewart, who is well known in congress and in the scientific community for his work in the Baltimore case particularly and in other cases. Now Stewart is firmly of the opinion that there is something here that needs to be investigated and has told me so many times.
Speaker 0: Mueller says that such an effort may be mounted outside the United States and cites a letter by Walter Stewart to the Canadian Medical Journal.
Speaker 2: What Stewart said was that he finds the evidence that is for fraud and ethical violations in research compelling Since the evidence comes almost entirely from Kinsey's book itself, Since I find it disturbing and believe it requires investigation.
Speaker 0: Doctor Muir says
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The researchers working for Kinsey were aware that the means in which they obtained this data was illegal but did nothing about it. https://t.co/FVxZsxTO0F
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the controversial methods used by Kinsey to study childhood sexuality. They mention that Kinsey's experiments involved force and unwilling participants, causing physical and emotional distress. The researchers were aware that their actions were illegal and chose to maintain confidentiality, even refusing to cooperate with authorities in apprehending a pedophile.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. As a practitioner or a psychologist, I cannot see that this is the way the way in which we collect information about normal childhood sexuality. To get pedophiles to go out and do experiments on children is not how we learn about normality.
Speaker 1: Kinsey acknowledges that some of the experiments involve the use of physical force with unwilling participants. Kinsey describes what he terms orgasms by the children, A gradual and sometimes prolonged buildup to orgasm, which involves still more violent convulsions of the whole body, heavy breathing, groaning, Sobbing or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears, especially among young children. Some of the children exhibited extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting. The males in the present group will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive definite pleasure from the situation. A faithful babe quiets down under the initial sexual stimulation, is distracted from other activities, against rhythmic pelvic thrust becomes tense as climax approaches, is thrown into convulsive action often with violent harm and lake movements, sometimes with weeping at the moment of climax.
According to Paul Gebhardt, a Kinsey report coauthor And former president of the Kinsey Institute, the researchers were aware that the experiments were illegal. We've always insisted on maintaining confidentiality even at the cost of thereby becoming immoral at best and criminal at worst, said Gebhardt. An example of criminality is our refusal to cooperate with authorities in apprehending a pedophile we had interviewed who is being sought for a sex murder.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Kinseys acolytes spread across the country playing important roles in shaping sex education curriculum and the academic credentialing of sex educators throughout America. https://t.co/am84hHGlzB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kinsey Institute has had a significant influence on sexology, with its disciples spreading to various sexology centers in the US. Dr. Mary Calderon, who worked with Kinsey, later co-founded the Sex Information and Education Council of the United States (SECUS). Lester Kuykendahl, another pioneering sexologist, mentored Derek Calderwood, who is the speaker's professor. Wardell Pomeroy, Kinsey's coauthor, was also involved and served as president of SECUS. Kuykendahl predicted that future sex education programs would explore same-sex and intergenerational sexual expression with reduced guilt and emphasis on normality. The main impact of these efforts is the demystification of sexual taboos in sex education, starting from kindergarten and continuing through high school, often focusing on AIDS prevention. The message is that early comprehensive sex education is necessary to prevent AIDS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kinsey Institute has dominated the world of sexology through the migration of Kinsey Disciples to several key centers of sexology, including New York University, the University of Pennsylvania, and the Institute For the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco. These three institutions account for the lion's and share the academic credentialing of sex educators in the United States. Working with the Kinsey team was doctor Mary Calderon, who was medical director For the Planned Parenthood Federation of America from 1953 to 1964 before cofounding the sex information and education council of the United States, better known as SECUS.
Speaker 1: She formed that organization with Lester Kuykendahl, Another pioneering sexologist who was the teacher and the mentor of Derek Calderwood, my professor.
Speaker 0: Also involved was Kenzie's coauthor, Wardell Pomeroy, a founding member who also served as president of CCUS as recently as 1975.
Speaker 1: In terms of Lester Kuykendahl, in 1985, He made a statement in an article entitled Sex Education in the Future that I think is worth noting. He says that programs of the future will probe sexual expression with same sex partners and even across generational lines. With a diminished sense of guilt, these patterns will become legitimate, and the emphasis on normality and abnormality will be much diminished with these future trends. Will be much diminished with these future trends.
Speaker 0: The most obvious impact of this effort is to demystify the taboos of sexuality in sex education classes to very young children. Many sex education curriculum now begin in kindergarten and continue through high school, often under AIDS prevention. The message to parents, if we don't begin teaching children about safe sex as early as possible, including every variation, then they may get AIDS.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Dr. John Money whom I recently wrote about is also a part of this tangled web. One of his students Dr. June Reinisch was a former president of the Kinsey Institute. Both Money and Reinisch saw no problem with pedophilia and Money was even interviewed about his views on it in a Dutch Magazine devoted to Pedophilia, a fact both Johns Hopkins and The Kinsey Institute undoubtedly would like to keep hidden. Oh well.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the views of Dr. John Money and the Kinsey Institute on child sexuality. Dr. Money, a prominent sex researcher, has written extensively on the subject. He was interviewed by a journal called PYDECCA, which supports man-boy relationships and pedophile groups. Dr. Money's interview suggests that he believes a mutual relationship between a young boy and an adult man is not harmful or pathological. This viewpoint aligns with Dr. Kinsey's belief that children should not be disturbed by genital touching unless influenced by cultural conditioning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Kinsey view of child sexuality has also been promulgated by doctor John Money, perhaps the most prominent sex researcher in America. A founding board member of CECUS, doctor Money has written numerous books as well as hundreds of papers, reviews, and textbook chapters on the subject of sex. In 1990, doctor June Reinisch dedicated her book, the Kinsey Institute New Report on Sex, to doctor Money, whom she describes as one of my mentors. Recently, doctor Money was interviewed by PYDECCA, the journal of pedophilia, which is published in the Netherlands. The journal argues for man boy sex and contains advertisements for the North American Man Boy Love Association and other pro pedophile groups.
Kinsey Institute associate doctor Vern Buelow is on PYDECA's editorial board, which issued this statement of purpose. The starting point of PYDECA is necessarily our consciousness of ourselves as pedophiles.
Speaker 1: But when you look at the journal, PYDECA, The Dutch Journal. You will see that on the board of directors, you have people like Verne Bulow. Verne Bulow was the president Of the Society For the Scientific Study of Sex, when they formed the accrediting committee for future university programs that give degrees to sex educators. Verimbulot did the foreword For Edward Brangerson's 2 volumes, loving boys. John Money of Johns Hopkins Hospital and the mentor of June Rhinish was interviewed in Paducah.
And, of course, he's one of the people saying that, The sex with children can be an enriching experience and doesn't harm the child.
Speaker 0: In doctor Money's interview in Paidika, he was asked about
Speaker 1: child sexuality. His reply, if I were to see
Speaker 0: the case of a boy age 10 or Valadee. His reply, if I were to see the case of a boy aged 10 or 12 who's intensely attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, If the relationship is totally mutual and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way. This attitude mirrors that of doctor Kinsey who once wrote that it is difficult to understand why a child, Except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Here we see former Director of the Kinsey Institute Dr. John Bancroft doing his best to put a PR spin on Kinseys relationship with Felix King the Pedophile he taught to takes “scientific” notes whilst raping children. https://t.co/UCne4B1Kwj
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1947, Kinsey sent his chapter on child sexuality to be approved by a person he called "mister Greene." The chapter drew from Greene's child abuse diaries, which raises doubts about its credibility. Some argue that relying on one person weakens its scientific value, but doesn't eliminate it completely. Critics believe Kinsey should have reported Greene to the police, but the Kinsey Institute disagrees, considering it immoral. Kinsey's defenders claim that Greene had stopped abusing children by the time he met Kinsey, but the Institute refuses to release Greene's diaries for verification. Jonathan Gaethorn Hardy's notes suggest that Greene continued his abusive behavior until 1954, over 10 years after meeting Kinsey.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1947, Kinsey sent the final proofs of his chapter on child sexuality for approval by the pedophile he code named mister Greene. Much of it came from Greene's child abuse diaries, which has called into question its value.
Speaker 1: The fact that it's only one person in itself weakens its scientific value, but doesn't Remove it. We've known of a few people of this kind who have kept detailed recordings of their sexual exploits over a long period time. To some extent, they may feel that they're justifying their sexual behavior in the process of of documenting it. And I think one has to be rather cautious about accepting their information just at face value.
Speaker 0: Kinsey's critics say that whether or not the material was scientific, he should have reported Greene to the police, but the Kinsey Institute rejects this.
Speaker 1: It's inconceivable, that one could do research in that way. Give people guarantees of mentality. And then when they've given you the information, say, well, I'm fairly gonna have to report you to the police. That would be immorality in in in my book of the highest order.
Speaker 0: Some of Kinsey's other defenders claimed that Greene had long ceased to be an active child abuser by the time he met Kinsey, and so there was no need to report him to the police But the Kinsey Institute refuses to release Greene's diaries which could corroborate this Only trusted Kinsey supporters are allowed access to them.
Speaker 2: By convincing them that I was not against Kinsey, but concerned to find out what he was really like, And as they got used to me and realized that I was honest and sincere, I did finally get into, I think, everything I could reasonably Didn't expect it.
Speaker 0: Jonathan Gaethorn Hardy's notes taken during his access to Greene's diaries suggest that the pedophile was actually active until 1954 more than 10 years after he first met Kinsey.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Dr. Bancourt continues his amoral rationalizations of Kinseys research by insinuating that he did not actually direct the pedophiles to commit heinous acts, he only received their reports, an account that doesn’t correspond to reality. Unfortunately for Kinsey, his Nazi Pedophile told a judge otherwise. You be the judge whether this is conceivable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the controversy surrounding Kinsey's research on sexuality and its potential connection to child sexual abuse. While some argue that researching sexuality is important, others question if the potential harm to children justifies it. Kinsey's supporters claim that he only collected information from individuals without encouraging any specific sexual behavior. However, there are allegations that Kinsey may have been involved in child sexual abuse, although no concrete evidence has been presented. The release of von Bauchsek's diaries, which could shed light on Kinsey's involvement, has been denied by the Kinsey Institute. Kinsey had appealed to people to provide information on their sexual activity, implying that he was willing to give instructions on recording it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think people have got to ask themselves the question, do they believe that research into sexuality should be done or should not be done, particularly research into sexuality, which might be in some sense illegal.
Speaker 1: But if the cost potentially is more children at risk of abuse, can that cost be justified?
Speaker 0: Consider the cost of remaining in ignorance. Unless we know about these behaviors, we'll be in a much Worth position than if we have more information about them. That was Kinsey's view.
Speaker 2: John Bancroft is adamant that Kinsey never did more than accept reports from BETA files on their sexual activity.
Speaker 0: Kinsey didn't ask anybody to carry out any particular form of sexual behavior. He simply asked them to Let him know of their experiences they'd had.
Speaker 2: But at von Buljec's trial, An exchange between the judge and the pedophile seemed to suggest otherwise. The judge said, I had the impression That you got to the children in order to impress Kinsey and to deliver him material. And von Blyasek replied. Kinsey himself asked me for that. If the judge's impression was correct and if Von Balusek was telling the truth, It would be evidence of Kinsey's involvement in ongoing child sexual abuse.
Speaker 3: It tells me that, Von Von Valiosek, who was not a Sex researcher got his directions as to how to do the, quote, scientific part of the research from doctor Kinsey That he was directed.
Speaker 0: Over the years, people have used their contacts with Kinsey in a variety of ways. And it's not surprising that if someone's Being charged on the fence, if they can bring Kinsey's name in, they will do in the hope that it might mitigate their case. But Kinsey was not responsible for what that man was doing nor did he encourage it.
Speaker 2: The key to resolving Kinsey's involvement with child sexual abuse is in von Bauchsek's diaries, But the Kinsey Institute refuses to release them. However, for more than 15 years, Kinsey appealed to people of all sexual orientations to send him information. In at least some of these appeals, he seemed prepared to give instructions on how to record their sexual activity.
Speaker 4: Persons who have kept calendars or who are willing to begin keeping day by day calendars showing the source and frequency of Their sexual outlet are urged to write to us for instructions.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Then there is Esther White, a victim who says that her dad sexually abused her in order to send the notes to Kinsey for his research. Even though the Institute denies all wrong doing, they refuse to this day to release the documents that would exonerate Kinsey if this was truly the case. Warning the details you are about to hear are disturbing to say the least.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Esther White, who comes from a family connected to Kinsey, claims she was abused by her grandfather and father. She believes her father provided information to the Kinsey Institute about the abuse. The institute cannot confirm if her father sent information, but they assure confidentiality. Esther fears her abuse may have been used in Kinsey's book on sexual behavior in females. Kinsey claimed children can enjoy abuse, but Esther's memories of the abuse are painful. She recalls a traumatic incident during a school performance. Critics argue that asking pedophiles for information on children's sexuality is not reliable. Kinsey reported such information for consideration, not as the best method.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Esther White is the first person publicly to make this claim. Esther's family had a long standing connection with Kinsey. Her grandfather attended Indiana University with him. But Esther came from an incestuous family. She claims she was abused first by her grandfather and later by her father.
Speaker 1: The abuse started with my father, I think, As a very young child, probably about age 7. My father started a loving, Concerned, petting, kind of an affection. And when the opportunity came along, he took the opportunity to Turn that from affection into what he called affection and love into a sexual relationship, intercourse, oral copulation, Ugly things that I don't like to talk about.
Speaker 0: Based on what her father told her, Esther believes he was one of the pedophiles who provided information to Kinsey.
Speaker 1: My father actually did, mail in some, questionnaires, I believe to the Kinsey Institute about the, sexual abuse that he was doing I mean, at the very peak of when all the abuse is going on, There was a a paper in a brown envelope, and it was kind of halfway out of the envelope. It was a summer afternoon, and I don't know why I remember there was a a warm breeze blowing through the bedroom window. The envelope had blown a little bit and I went to put it back on a dresser and I saw that there were questions there. It was a whole series of questions with little boxes in front of them. And I read one of the sentences And I didn't know one of the words.
And so I asked my father, what is o r g a Oh, he said, that's orgasm. And he continued to explain to me what an orgasm was. And then I realized why he was looking at his watch Because he was telling me to let him know when I felt an orgasm. And when he saw that I had seen this paper, he immediately said he had a deadline to meet and he had to send Otherwise, shall we put it in this envelope?
Speaker 2: I know nothing about this woman or Her father or grandfather, I have no idea whether there's any basis, a fact in what she's saying at all.
Speaker 3: Would it be possible for the institute to examine its files and determine whether her father did send information to Kinsey.
Speaker 2: At this point, I can't say. We have a huge amount of information that people have sent to the institute about their sexual experiences. Somewhere amongst that, there may be something relevant To this woman, but that material is uncatalogued, unordered, and I really I have no idea how difficult it will be to check that out.
Speaker 3: Can you understand, though, why she would feel Disturbed by the knowledge that material may be residing here in the institute.
Speaker 2: If the description is accurate, then I can see she she could have some concern. Yeah. But she can also rest assured that the material will be treated Great confidentiality, and, we will never reveal the identity of anybody involved to to anyone else.
Speaker 0: But from what her father said about Kinsey, Esther fears the details of her abuse may have been used in his second book, Sexual behavior in the human female. In a section dealing with sex between adults and children, Kinsey claimed to have evidence that children can enjoy abuse.
Speaker 4: The adult contacts are a source of pleasure to some children And sometimes may arouse the child erotically and bring it to orgasm. It is difficult to understand why a child, Except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touch.
Speaker 0: But for Esther, some memories are so painful. They stand out even 50 years later.
Speaker 1: My School was going to have a little operetto. When I got on stage, I was so scared because I knew what was gonna It happened on the way home. My father put me in the back seat and, of course, continued to sexually abuse me. But I looked out the back window and there was a a gorgeous, beautiful moon and stars. And it's very difficult to say.
I'm sorry. It was a very painful memory that we remember. I was Crying so hard that the tears were running into my out of my eyes and down into my ears. And I was crying, and my sinuses were so filled up I couldn't breathe. And My ears were filling up with water, and I just had a fear.
I'm I'm gonna die.
Speaker 3: Surely, the way to get information on children's sexuality is not by asking Men who have a vested interest in saying children are sexual, and they enjoy being sexual.
Speaker 2: Nobody has said that the best way of getting Information about childhood sexuality is by talking to pedophiles. Kinsey didn't say that. He simply reported some information of that kind because he thought it was worthy of consideration.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If all of this wasn’t enough, Kinsey had a serious affinity for Aleister Crowley, a man who called himself “The Beast 666” an ode to Satan. He likened himself to the anti-Christ and after Crowleys death, Kinsey traveled to Italy to obtain his personal diaries. There he became friends with the infamous Kenneth Anger, an avowed Luciferian film maker that had associations with Charles Manson.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alfred Kinsey, known for his studies on human sexuality, was influenced by the satanist Aleister Crowley. Kinsey sought out Crowley's diaries, which detailed his controversial sexual exploits and satanic rituals. Crowley's beliefs and practices, including pedophilia and justifying immorality, shocked many at the time. Kinsey visited Crowley's temple in Sicily and had a close acquaintance named Kenneth Anger, who was involved in the occult and later became a co-founder of Anton LaVey's Church of Satan. Anger's films featured Crowley's philosophy of "do what thou wilt," which aligned with Kinsey's views on human sexuality. Kinsey's obsession with sex and his connection to Anger were significant in his research and grant funding. The Kinsey Institute Library still holds an archive of Anger's films and correspondence with Kinsey.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kinsey's willingness to work with the devil, at one point, seemed to take on a very literal meaning.
Speaker 1: One of the interesting things I found several years ago in researching the satanist, Aleister Crowley, was the influence that he has had on so many people here in the United States of America. And one of the men men that he had influenced was Alfred Kinsey.
Speaker 0: After publishing his male and female reports, Kinsey began to travel abroad and study sexuality in foreign countries. In his book, Kinsey coauthor Wardell Pomeroy wrote that Kinsey went looking for a prized item, the diaries of Lester Crowley.
Speaker 1: Crowley died just a year before, Kinsey's book came out.
Speaker 0: Crowley was a famous and highly controversial British occultist in the early part of 20th century. His sexual exploits and bizarre and sometimes deadly satanic rituals had been exposed in the London newspapers.
Speaker 1: He also talked about taking a virgin and having sexual relations with her. And then upon, climax, To actually murder her, cut her in 6 pieces, and put the names of the various demon gods on those 6 limbs, those 6 parts of her body.
Speaker 0: Taking the name for the antichrist in the bible. Crowley called himself the beast 6
Speaker 1: 66.
Speaker 0: His famous saying was, do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law, by which he justified all forms of immorality.
Speaker 1: Crowley had a sex temple and had practiced group sex and orgies and what have you, so called sex magic. Crowley was into pedophilia. He was into, justifying his pedophilia. In fact, he had said, let me seduce the boys of England. He wanted to seduce them, and he then starts talking about sodomy and it being should be acceptable.
So, I mean, it was quite shocking, especially back then.
Speaker 0: Pomeroy wrote that Crowley was called by lord Douglas the wickedest man who ever lived, and his sexual history alone was enough to earn him the title he gloried in, the beast. Crowley kept the diary up to his death. 2 weeks after Kinsey tracked down these papers in England, he found himself in the temple that the beast had founded in Sicily. Kinsey is pictured here inside Crowley's temple, known as the Abbe Thelema, where he performed his satanic rituals. On the wall is a picture of Crowley himself.
While across from Kinsey is another man named Kenneth Anger. Anger was a close acquaintance who appeared in some of Kinsey's sex films made in the attic of his Bloomington home. As an avant garde filmmaker, Anger was deeply involved in the occult. He directed films with titles such as Lucifer Rising and the invocation of my demon brother.
Speaker 1: Kenneth Anger, is a cofounder of, Anton LaVey's Church of Satan, And Kenneth Anger, also was you know, had a penchant for younger men, for sure. Bobby Beausoleil was his live in boy's friend. That's the same Bobby Beausoleil that Committed the first murder, killing him for, Charles Manson. That was his live in boyfriend. He played Lucifer in one of his, occult movies that extolled the virtues of Aleister Crowley's magic and what have you.
Speaker 0: In this image from one of Anger's films, we see Bobby Beausoleil, who would later become one of Charles Manson's killers. He's standing next to a doorway with Crowley's maxim, do what thou wilt, painted on the door. A phrase that certainly fit with Kinsey's own view of human sexuality.
Speaker 1: Pomeroy even admits that that Kinsey, loved, Crowley's writings, including, specifically mentioning some of his homosexual erotica. One of his books called White Stains.
Speaker 0: Kenneth Anger is quoted saying that Kinsey was obsessed with obtaining the great beast's day to day sex diaries. To obtain grant monies and maintain the support of the university. Kinsey needed the excuse of research to validate his 24 hours a day obsession with sex. However, Kinsey's battle cry of do your best and let other people react as they will seemed the variation on Crowley's do what thou wilt maxim. An older Kenneth Anger is pictured here with the name Lucifer tattooed on his chest.
So important was Anger's relationship with Kinsey that to this day, the Kinsey Institute Library features a Kenneth Anger collection with an archive of anger's films as well as the correspondence between him and Alfred Kinsey.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This affinity for Crowley should not be taken lightly, as Lucifer is also a favorite of the Rockefeller’s whom initially funded Kinsey. Although not widely known, at the famous Rockefeller Center in New York City, Prometheus (aka the Hellenic Lucifer) is located at the center of the Sunken Plaza and is flanked by his creation, mankind. Holding the fire stolen from Zeus and gliding towards humanity. He lies inside a ring in which are outlined the signs of the Zodiac. Behind the statue is an inscription saying: “Prometheus, teacher in every art, brought the fire that hath proved to mortals a means to mighty ends.” I’m not sure there is a better phrase to sum up Kinseys view on morality as Crowleys “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law”, he certainly did and has been celebrated for it.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
A Glimmer of Hope Recently a provision in Indiana’s budget was passed that eliminates funding by taxpayers for the institute, a win years in the making. Watch this news report about the turn of events. They explicitly say that allegations made against Kinsey and the Institute are without evidence. Based on what you have just seen, ask yourself how on earth they can make this claim in good conscience.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Indiana University's Kinsey Institute, known for its research on sexuality and sexual health, will no longer receive state funding due to a provision in the state budget. The amendment, introduced by a Republican lawmaker, alleges without evidence that the institute's founder, Alfred Kinsey, sexually abused children. The provision has faced criticism for being based on unfounded allegations and conspiracy theories. State representative Matt Pierce expressed surprise that the amendment passed into law, suggesting a shift towards a more extreme faction within the Indiana Republican Party. The university is concerned about the precedent set by singling out a specific research institute and the potential limitations it may impose on public colleges and universities. The Kinsey Institute primarily relies on grants and donations, not taxpayer dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Amendment to the state budget introduced in February that would block Indiana University from using state funding for the Kinsey Institute has now become law. State representative Matt Pierce says this could be a watershed moment for Indiana politics. Ethan Sandweiss has more.
Speaker 1: Indiana University's Kinsey Institute has attracted both admiration and controversy over the last 75 years. Its research into sexuality, gender, and sexual health Has earned it a spot in the center of a global debate. But a provision in the Indiana state budget finalized this month will block state funding for the institute. The amendment was introduced by freshman Republican lawmaker, Larissa Sweet of Wabash. She alleged without evidence that the Institute's founder, Alfred Kinsey sexually abused children and insinuated that Kinsey researchers continue to enable child abuse.
Speaker 2: Could they be hiding child predators? Is this A place if if there is any place where Chris Hanson needs to bring to catch a predator, it is Indiana University.
Speaker 1: Sweet's provision was met with immediate pushback.
Speaker 3: This amendment is based on old, unproven Allegations of conspiracies that did not exist, that did not happen. These are warmed over Internet memes that keep coming back.
Speaker 1: State rep Matt Pierce was shocked when the amendment passed into law. The Bloomington based legislator has represented the 61st district since 2002. He remembers a session 2 decades ago when Republican lawmakers attempted the same move but were blocked by members of their own party.
Speaker 3: I am surprised. I thought for sure the senate would just take that out in their initial draft of the budget that we pass out a committee.
Speaker 1: The senate did not take amendment 2 out of its initial draft. It wasn't removed in conference committee either. The amendment was in the state budget when it was signed into law on Monday. Pierce says the inclusion of amendment 2 indicates a shift In the Indiana Republican Party in favor of a more extreme faction.
Speaker 3: I don't believe for a minute that the leadership really wanted that provision in the bill and thought it was necessary. Terry, but at the end of the day, they couldn't bring themselves to say no to this rising base of power within the legislature.
Speaker 1: Practically enforcing the new budget restrictions will be a challenge for IU. Formerly a university affiliated nonprofit, Kinsey was completely integrated into IU in 2016. No separate line item for Kinsey exists in the budget, which makes finances hard to track. According to the university, most of the Kinsey Institute's funds come from grants and donations, not taxpayer dollars. Amendment 2 blocks state funding for pretty much anything Kinsey researchers could use from administrative costs to utilities.
McKinsey researchers work across campus in many departments. After the Indiana budget passed, IU president Pamela Witten issued a statement in support of the Kinsey Institute. The university is concerned that a provision singling out a Pacific Research Institute sets a troubling precedent with implications that could limit the ability of public colleges and universities To pursue research and scholarship that benefits people and improves lives. The university declined further requests for comment. For Indiana News Desk, I'm Ethan Sandweiss.
Speaker 0: The Kinsey Institute was founded in 1947 by turned sexuality researcher Alfred Kinsey. It's located on campus in Lindley Hall.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This institute and the research conducted by its founder needs to be investigated by authorities and all curriculum based on Kinseys writing should be eliminated from all schools due to its fraudulent nature as well as its endorsement of child abuse in the name of “science”. After learning about this history, a history that has been deliberately obfuscated and occulted. How can any rational human being endorse this madness by apologizing for an institution whose very basis is founded on data obtained from the dregs of society? An institution that has profoundly influenced perceptions of ourselves and sits at center of our children’s sexual education classes. I encourage you, armed with this knowledge, to start challenging this insane orthodoxy. The results of which we see daily with our very own eyes. Do not allow those around you to gaslight and ridicule, make them defend the indefensible. Kinsey.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you value the information provided in this thread please consider giving me a follow so you don’t miss future threads like these.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 9-hour deposition, Aaron Siri skillfully challenges Stanley Plotkin, revealing alarming omissions and attempts to evade the truth. Plotkin's reluctance to admit the lack of safety testing for vaccines and the unsuitability of aluminum adjuvants as a placebo control is concerning. Plotkin even acknowledges experimenting on vulnerable groups like orphans, the mentally ill, and the disabled. Watch the deposition here: [link provided].
@Inversionism - Inversionism
If anyone who is pro-vaccine watched this 9 hour deposition in full between @AaronSiriSG and Plotkin, they wouldn't be pro-vaccine anymore. Siri is a beast of a lawyer. It's full of horrifying omissions, willful attempts to avoid the truth, and Siri trying to keep Plotkin on point because he kept trying to weasel and ramble his way out of admitting vaccines don't have safety testing, or that you shouldn't consider aluminum adjuvants as an acceptable placebo control to discern safety. https://rumble.com/v38d9ux-full-9-hour-deposition-between-stanley-plotkin-and-aaron-siri.html Here is just a few minutes where Plotkin admits to experimenting on orphans, the mentally ill, and the disabled.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is asked if they have used orphans or mentally handicapped individuals to study experimental vaccines. They confirm using mentally handicapped children in a study mentioned in an article. The speaker is then asked if they believe it is better to experiment on those less likely to contribute to society, such as children with disabilities. They say they don't remember specifically but it's possible. The speaker is asked if they wrote a letter to the editor on human experimentation ethics, and they confirm writing it. The letter questions whether experiments should be done on fully functioning adults or on children and adults who are not socially potential. The speaker admits to using babies of imprisoned mothers and individuals under colonial rule in vaccine studies, including in the Belgian Congo with almost 1,000,000 people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever used orphans to study an experimental vaccine?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?
Speaker 1: I don't recollect ever doing studies in Mentally handicapped in the years. At the time, in 1960s, It was not an uncommon practice.
Speaker 0: There's an article entitled, Attenuation of RA273 Rubellovirus in WI38 human diploid cells. Are you familiar with that article? Yes. In that article, one of the things that says is 13, it is one of the things that says is 13 Seronegative mentally retarded children were given RA273 vaccine. Okay.
Well,
Speaker 1: then in that case, that's What I did. Okay.
Speaker 0: Have you ever expressed that it's better to perform experiments On those less likely to be able to contribute to society, such as children with handicap than with Children without or adults without handicaps?
Speaker 1: I don't remember specifically, but it's Possible.
Speaker 0: Do you remember ever writing to the editor of Ethics on Human Experimentation?
Speaker 1: I don't remember specifically, but I may well have.
Speaker 0: Do you recognize this letter you wrote to the editor? Yes. Okay. Did you write this letter? Yes.
Okay. It's one of the things you wrote. The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society Or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human informed but not in social potential? Yes. Okay.
It may be objected that this question implies a Nazi philosophy, but I do not think that it is difficult to distinguish nonfunctioning persons From members of ethnic, racial, economic or other groups?
Speaker 1: Yes. Okay.
Speaker 0: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used individuals under Colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Did you do so in the Belgian Congo?
Yes. Did that experiment involve almost 1,000,000 people? Well,
Speaker 1: all right.
reSee.it AI Summary
The left is waking up to the reality of BLM and soon will realize the truth about Queer+ activism. GLSEN, backed by billions, has infiltrated schools. Queer Theory's architects and gender theory are equally concerning. This isn't by chance; it's a calculated revolution. Dissent is labeled as bigotry, but it's forced upon us. Society must acknowledge the greater story and the evil within this Trojan Horse. Our culture and children are being manipulated against our will. Everything about this is wrong.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
A whole lot of people on the left have been smacked out of their little moralizing coma and back to reality re what BLM is and was always about. Now I look forward to when they do the same with Queer+ activism. Wait til you see what you find under those rocks!
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Start high-level with GLSEN. 👇 The multi-billion supported conglomerate that has pervaded all of our schools with the specific mission of "queering" kids, and it's tentacles that stretch from the Fortune 500, to the Obama White House, to George Soros. https://theojordan.substack.com/p/what-is-glsen
What is GLSEN?
The curious case of Kevin Jennings
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And then take a close look at Queer Theory's architects. 👇 Oh, it gets so much worse. Everything he states here is factual. It's their own words! Receipts. Hard to hold back such wicked lust. Why does our Intellegensia worship and champion these figures?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the connection between anarchism and pedophilia, but is interrupted and asked to talk about something relevant. They then play a game called Queer Theory Pedophilia Jeopardy, where they mention influential figures in queer theory who have supported the eradication of age of consent laws. They also mention an article that defends pedophilia and compare it to a preference for spicy food. The speaker talks about the author Pat Califia and quotes from their book, highlighting their views on children's sexual activity. They mention Judith Butler's controversial views on incest and conclude that no queer theorist has spoken out against pedophilia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a long correlation between anarchism and pedophilia and support for pedophilia. The Oh, wait wait wait wait wait wait wait, that's a beautiful line. Thank you so much for asking how about something relevant. I've been talking about rape culture all day and pedophilia and the support of pedophilia is not rape culture. Actually actually, it seems if you're acting like this is a spurious connection, so we're gonna play Jeopardy.
This is we're gonna play Queer theory we're gonna play Queer Theory, Pedophilia, Jeopardy! Okay, answer. Commonly called the godfather of queer theory. Okay. 100 points.
Foucault, another way to ask this is, who argued? No, I guess the answer would be argued for the eradication patient of age of consent laws as in down to infants.
Speaker 1: Who is to a co? Thank
Speaker 0: Next one. The author of the the author of the, founding documents of queer theory.
Speaker 1: Who is Gail Rubin?
Speaker 0: Who is Gail Rubin? What percentage? Don't know the answer is 50%. Question is?
Speaker 1: Amount in that article that was a defensive pedophilia specifically, quote, boy lovers. So they just talk boys. Oh.
Speaker 0: And since you're not believing me, quote quote, this is in the founding document of Queer Theory. White communists and homosexuals in 19 fifties, boy lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders of their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation. In the founding document of career theory. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm using facts.
Speaker 1: A thousand, a thousand apologies.
Speaker 0: One must never let facts in a way. Oh, she also compared by the way, she compared pedophilia she compared pedophilia 2, a preference for spicy food. The thing is I have never heard of anyone who has to have years therapy because they ate
Speaker 1: hot and sour soup.
Speaker 0: Okay, short for 200. Now it is, now it is now it is pedophilia and queer theory for 300, that would be author of, Macho Sluts. Author of Macho Sluts and Public Sex. Pat Phillipia. Wait, wait, wait.
What was it somebody said? Stay relevant.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk
Speaker 0: let's talk about, Pat Califia Okay. Here's something from 1 of, Pat Philippius books You know, it's really interesting. It's really interesting that when I actually start talking about the relationship relationship between queer theory and anarchism and pedophilia that, it becomes they they really want to shut me up now. So here's Pat Califia. They want to
Speaker 1: get coffee. You're a host host.
Speaker 0: Pat Califia.
Speaker 1: Oh, wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Just a second.
Just a second.
Speaker 0: I was accused of homophobia because I am against pedophilia.
Speaker 1: Yes. Right. Who is it who actually makes the connections? Could you not?
Speaker 0: Okay. Here's something by Pat Califia. Pat Califia has written, any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks, or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in someone's lap, engagement in sexual activity by which she does not mean play doctors. She means with adults. She's very clear about that because she also says that, pedophile should be more and not less, invested in children's lives.
Okay. So we're at 300. 400 is, the most famous, queer theorist of today. Answer Judith. No.
It is not Judith Butler. It's who is judge Judith Butler? Okay, Judith Butler is the most famous queer theorist of the day
Speaker 1: incest is
Speaker 0: a violation suggesting I think there may be occasions, which it's not. Why would I talk that way? Well, I do think that there are probably forms of incest that are not necessarily traumatic and which or which gain their traumatic character by virtue of the conscious of social saying produce. Yeah. That's true.
That's one of that's one of the queer heroes. Okay. Now now we have we have, for 500, we have, the last 1 in the Queer Theory and Pedophilia. The answer is queer theorist who has spoken out strongly against pedophilia
Speaker 1: 0. 0. Who is no one?
Speaker 0: Who is no one? Not a single one. Because the entire thing is based on transgressing. Yeah. I know, dear fucking god.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Do you think things look any better in the arena of gender theory? Understand, these don't live alone. Think of them as a hydra; multiple dragon heads of the same singular beast. Here are those architects. 👇 You may want to finish your breakfast first. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1533848596008902658?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This isn't happening by chance (been underway for decades) and is of a specific design and for a specific objective. A revolutionary objective. Aha! 💡 This talk contains a treasure trove of information for understanding this all. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1657015219133071360?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And of course all dissent to this (even logical scrutiny) gets painted as bigotry. But those good people above working so hard against it? ☝️ That's the LGB United. Are they bigots too? No, our people have been subjected to systematic propaganda (Hatecraft) to force this on us.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Now, there is a greater societal story here too. I'm not submitting that everything in this pot is pedophilia. I describe that greater story below. But just like radical death-cult activism rode in under BLM, yes, true evil rides within this Trojan Horse.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Nathan skipped some important pages here. All gender theory ever was, is the need of some to legitimatize their own variance off gender norms. "I'm not an effeminate man, I'm actually a woman." No, you're actually not. You're just a guy who is feminine. And because that is off…
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And instead of us addressing it, we're painted as Monsters for even mentioning it. Yet, this activism is consuming our culture and being forced down the throats of our children against our wishes! Everything about this is wrong. 👇 https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1712531196264006069?s=20
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, known as the "beautiful vegan Messiah," talks about their name and their dad. They mention liberating pigs from small cages and criticize their mom. They also claim to have a high score on Hot or Not. Speaker 1 interrupts and tries to calm Speaker 0 down, but Speaker 0 continues with offensive language. Speaker 1 calls for security to remove Speaker 0 and apologizes to the audience for the behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am the beautiful vegan, Messiah. It's a song. I didn't say I was and she knows it. I was just like my dad. Okay.
10 luxury cars. My dad told me I had the same your name is him until I legally changed it. My mom did not bail me out, gentlemen, she knew I was innocent. I'm liberating over 70,000,000,000 Pigs in cages so small they cannot move for years. Okay.
I work, my mom's a sociopathic piece of. I have the highest score in Hot or Not history. I got 9.9 out of 10 after 327 women raided me. Let's see your talent. Let's see your talent, you ugly piece of.
Speaker 1: Okay. Stop. Hey. Hey. Look at me.
Speaker 0: Let's get this out.
Speaker 1: No. Hey. Hey. Hey. No.
You need to look at me.
Speaker 0: I don't have to do
Speaker 1: Okay. Take him out. Security, get him out of here.
Speaker 0: Thank god. Thank god.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna come out here and use that kind of language in front of my audience. And audience, I apologize. That is childish and immature behavior.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Every element is there ☝️ in 1min 11secs. This is a loser of our society's natural order. One riddled from his own daddy issues. And all gender ideology and Queer+ activism have done is artificially elevate and empower him and praise him for being broken. https://theojordan.substack.com/p/unscripted-4-11-23#details
Unscripted 4-11-23
Listen now | A rant about the madness of elevating gender dysphoria, and the damaging impact of mainstreaming gender theory on both the individual and society as a whole
theojordan.substack.com
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(999x0:1001x2)/bono-mike-pence-5d634894dc3f487a9661b2be52a994e7.jpg)
