reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 25, 2023 at 8:09 AM

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

They're getting these perspectives directly from a pedophile forum. "The world's top trans medical association collaborated with members of a site that hosts child sexual abuse material in order to draft gender identity guidelines." http://bit.ly/3RzoONL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH) recently released draft guidelines that included the category of UNIC as a protected gender identity. However, it was discovered that WPATH took guidance from a castration forum called the UNIC archive, which hosts disturbing content including child sexual abuse fantasies. The archive contains over 3,000 stories depicting children being sexually abused and castrated. One of the forum's administrators, known as Jesus, was revealed to be Dr. Thomas W. Johnson, a professor emeritus at California State University. Another leading member, Dr. Richard J Wasserseug, has used the alias uniqueunique on the forum for over 20 years. Despite the alarming findings, mainstream media has largely ignored this issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Discussions and debates around the influence of gender ideology continue to get more heated and more popular, especially when it comes to its impact on children, but did you know that the world's largest professional association for trans healthcare took guidance from a castration forum that hosts child sexual abuse fantasies? Let's talk about that. On December 3, 2021, The World Professional Association of Transgender Health or WPATH for short released draft guidelines which included for the first time the category of UNIC as a protected gender identity. Eunuch refers to a man who has been castrated. Historically and depending on culture, eunuch served some distinct social roles often in servile hierarchies like in the Ottoman Empire, but believe it or not some men also have castration fetishes and those men appear to have influenced WPATH in their decision to include them in their latest guidelines. Back in May, Redux published an exclusive investigation that was the result of months of research into members of a forum called the UNIC archive. The UNIC archive had actually been referenced in WPATH's latest guidelines as a source on the UNIC gender identity, but the UNIC archive is no normal sight. In fact, it hosts some pretty disturbing stuff. In WPATH's draft standards of care, the UNIC archive's fiction archive is directly acknowledged and named, but the document does not mention the large amount of stories within the archive that directly involve the sadistic sexual abuse of children. During the investigation, Redux was able to enter a password protected area of the site within the UNIC archives by completing a membership application, and what we found was over three 1,000 stories many of which depicted children being sexually abused and castrated. Minor was actually available as a category filter that allowed users to specifically search for erotic stories that featured children. In addition to Forced surgical castrations, chemical castrations were also sexualized and eroticized. Some stories featured Nazi doctors experimenting on young boys. Another story imagined a world where the age of consent had been lowered to 12 and children could receive genital modification without parental consent. On the UNIC archive forums, one of the most prominent participants is a site administrator who uses the moniker Jesus. Searching through his post history, Redux found that Jesus took responsibility for several prominent decisions on gender identity, including the language used to define gender identity in the DSM-five. Jesus also said that in 2016, the president of WPATH at the time, Eli Coleman, had personally approached him to contribute to the upcoming standards of care. Redux unmasked you this as being Doctor. Thomas W. Johnson, a professor emeritus at California State University in Chico. Johnson had been an active participant in the Forum since two 1, just years after the UNIC archive site was created, he has also conducted several surveys with forum members and published their responses in academic journals including one released by WPATH, the International Journal of Transgenderism. Johnson has given lectures on expanding the transgender umbrella and is an active member of the Cal State campus pushing gender ideology even today. In addition to Johnson, the identities of 2 other leading site members were Also revealed in our exclusives, Doctor. Richard J Wasserseug, a professor from Canada, has for over 20 years used the alias uniqueunique on the forum, while Christer h. Wollette has been active in the community since 1998 under the renamed Christophe. In June 2009, Willette was invited by WPATH to speak on Munich identity disorder along with Wasserstein Johnson at a conference in Oslo. There are 2 disturbing videos of Willette posted to his YouTube channel. In both, he is dressed in a nun's habit, holds a cigar, and about obscenities. In Sister Christeron Cussing, he role plays as though addressing an audience of children while reading from a list of swear words. Johnson and Wasserstone had previously released academic research justifying the pedophilic fantasies amongst the castration fetishists on the forum. I barely scratched the surface of the disturbing information Redux's investigations pulled up, but through it all the most important thing to remember is that these were the both informing the world's largest trans medical association on aspects of what defines gender identity. I mean think about it men whose fantasies include Castrating young boys are working alongside a medical body which recommends chemical castration to children in the form of puberty blockers. These are the very same drugs that given to chemically castrate convicted sex offenders by the way. Unsurprisingly, despite how damning it all is, it's gone totally overlooked by the mainstream media, But that's why Redux is here to bring you the truth no matter who gets offended by it.
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 9:29 PM

@EdwardMondini - Edward Mondini

“…people who push sexual reassignment surgery are “collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder.” ~ Dr. Paul McHugh, University Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Liberals Furious! Johns Hopkins Chief Psychiatrist: Transgenderism is a ‘Mental Disorder’ [VIDEO] - John Hawkins' Right Wing News The transgender movement has been growing steadily, with the LGBT lobby insisting that Americans accept that people can choose their gender at will and even change it if they want rightwingnews.com
Saved - April 23, 2023 at 9:16 PM

@xxclusionary - Right Side of History™️

Watch. The. Entire. Thing. Transitioning children is one of the most egregious crimes in American medical history.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An endocrinologist questions the use of powerful hormones and surgeries in gender affirmative therapy without concrete evidence of gender identity. They highlight the high rates of desistance in children with gender dysphoria and the lack of objective markers to determine if a child will persist in their gender identity. The Endocrine Society acknowledges the low quality of evidence and the difficulty in identifying which children require treatment. The American Academy of Pediatrics suggests asking the children themselves. The spread of the affirmative model of care has outpaced the evidence supporting it, as shown by systematic reviews indicating poor quality and uncertain benefits. A study on mastectomy in youth is criticized for drawing conclusions based on a small sample size and short follow-up period. The quality of research in this field is questioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A board certified endocrinologist practicing in private practice for the last 16 years. I've been studying, and publishing in this area for the last 5 years, including peer reviewed journals such as Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism and others. I also have a patient who is a detransitioner. I I think it's important to note that studies have shown that desistance or growing out of this condition of children by adulthood is very high, some 50% to 98%. I want to be sure before I give someone a very powerful hormone like insulin that they in fact have diabetes. What about cancer? Before we give any powerful agents such as chemotherapeutics or surgeries, we certainly want to have physical evidence of this problem, such as biopsies or imaging. Now, the gender affirmative therapy treatment proposed by WPATH gives very powerful hormones and surgeries on what basis? Where can we find the gender identity to be certain that these children will not desist by adulthood? Can we use imaging of the brain or blood tests, genetic testing? Are there other biomarkers to ensure that we are correct. There is no such thing. Speaker 1: The Endocrine Society put out guidelines in 2017, And they were very careful in the guidelines, one, to point out that the evidence was of low and very low quality. And they also said in the guidelines That they have no idea how you identify which kids are trans and require this treatment. And then the American Academy of Pediatrics, the next year, just lept into that void and Oh. Oh, we'll tell you how you know which kids. You ask them. Prior to 2018, I had maybe 1 translation, but then there was another one And another one and another one. It wasn't until later that I started asking questions like, wait. Every single kid I send to the gender clinic Gets put on puberty blockers across sex hormones. Just it was happening immediately. Speaker 2: This affirmative model of care has spread wildly in the last 8 years. Now we have objective, unbiased, systematic reviews. These systematic reviews tell us the evidence for youth transition is poor quality and with very low certainty for benefit. In JAMA Pediatrics, there was a study reported from Northwestern University in Chicago. Patients ranged in age from 13 to 24 years. The authors concluded that mastectomy was beneficial and should not be delayed in youth. What led them to that conclusion? The finding that 3 months after surgery, the 36 patients were happy with their flat chests. They lost 9% of their surgical cases to follow-up, 9% in 3 months. It is absurd, meaningless to draw any conclusions after 3 months. This paper is indicative of the quality of research we have in this field, published in our most prestigious journals. We have a serious problem.
Saved - June 17, 2023 at 12:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A study on Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD) has been retracted by the publisher after just three months. The study found that ROGD is a socially contagious syndrome, causing youth to falsely believe they are trans and worsen their mental state through social and medical transitions. The study also found that girls are more likely to transition socially than boys, and that parents felt pressured by clinicians to go along with these transitions. The study raises questions about the desirability of transition and the effects of social transition on mental health.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

THREAD: A study contradicting leftist narratives around gender dysphoria has been RETRACTED by the publisher less than 3 months after being published.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD), described as a “socially contagious syndrome,” follows a theory proposing that culture, values, and preoccupations cause some youth—especially females—to attribute certain personal issues to gender dysphoria.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

ROGD causes youth to “falsely believe” that they are trans, and they must socially and medically transition in order to resolve their issues.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Prior mental issues were common—those with these issues were more likely to transition socially and medically than those without them. Parents often felt pressured by clinicians to go along with these transitions, which considerably WORSENED their child’s mental state.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

75% of youths in the study were biological females, who were found to be MUCH more likely to transition socially than biological males.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

The increasing number of detransitioners raises questions about the “desirability” of transition, according to the study.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

84.3% of survey respondents were mothers reporting on their own children. Likewise, relationships between “trans youth” and their mothers declined more severely than other relationships after transition.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Gender dysphoria tends to appear in girls earlier than boys and for longer periods of time in girls than boys

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

57% of parents said their child has a history of mental issues. 59.4% of those children were girls, which was slightly higher than those who were boys (51%). The graph below indicates how long mental issues became prevalent before a child’s dysphoria.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Anxiety was the most common symptom prior to dysphoria, which was most common among girls (47.3%) than boys (35.2%). “Difficulty socializing with peers” was the most common symptom among boys (28.1%).

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

72.6% of parents said stressful events in their child’s life may have contributed to the onset of gender dysphoria.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Coming out as a “different gender” rather than the opposite gender was more common among girls than boys. In my eyes, this indicates that “coming out” is often done solely for social gain.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

65.3% of youths had socially transitioned. Of those youth, 65.7% were girls.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Out of all social transition steps, the majority of boys (22.7%) had changed pronouns. The majority of girls (76.8%) had begun “breast binding.”

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Asked to rate the effects of social transition on their child’s dysphoria, anxiety and depression, parents were much more likely to say they had worsened than improved.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

51.8% of parents (out of 390 who answered the question) said they had felt pressure from a “gender clinic or specialist” to socially or medically transition their child. These parents were also more likely to believe their child had deteriorated after transition.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

37.8% of parents said they’d been referred to a gender specialist. 82.3% of girls with a referral had socially transitioned, compared with 54% of girls who didn’t. For boys, those numbers were 44.3% and 21.1%.

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

👀 55.4% of parents said their child was friends w/ others who “came out as transgender around the same time.” 73.3% of girls w/ transgender friends had taken steps toward social transition, compared with 54% without such friends. For boys, the numbers were 39.5% and 21.7%

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

“Youths with history of mental health issues were especially likely to have taken steps to socially and medically transition.” 🚨The authors then explain why that is so concerning🚨

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

Supposedly, the publisher and editor-in-chief retracted the study in order to protect the “privacy” of the participants, but we ALL know this is purely political. 🚨

@WokeArchive - Woke Archive

The authors are Suzanna Diaz of @P_ROGDK and Michael Bailey (@profjmb), a psychology professor at Northwestern University. Link to full study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02576-9

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria: Parent Reports on 1655 Possible Cases - Archives of Sexual Behavior During the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in adolescents and young adults (AYA) complaining of gender dysphoria. One influential if controv link.springer.com
Saved - June 19, 2023 at 3:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
David Reimer's tragic story sheds light on the origins of gender identity. Psychologist John Money's theory, taught in schools, was based on his experiment with David, who was forced to undergo sex reassignment surgery. Money's abuse included taking nude photos of David and his brother in sexual positions. Despite the experiment's failure, Money publicized it as a success, leading to David and his brother's suicides. This ideology is tearing families apart and must be opposed on a mass scale.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Thread The Shocking Origin Of Gender Identity A cautionary tale the world has ignored. What you are about to watch is deeply disturbing and unbelievably sad. In 2000 David Reimer went on Oprah to detail the horrors inflicted on him by Psychologist John Money, the man who invented the concept of Gender Identity. He appeared for the first time publicly on the Oprah Winfrey show to expose what had been done to him.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is the story of David, known as Jon Joan in medical journals, and his mother Janet. Janet made the difficult decision to change David's sex and raise him as a girl. They discuss the challenges they faced and the doubts they had throughout the process. David never felt like he fit in as a girl and struggled to conform to societal expectations. Janet tried to convince him that it was okay to be himself, but David felt lonely and desperate to fit in. Ultimately, David realized that he couldn't change who he was and accepted himself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For years, this case was called a medical triumph, but in truth, the case was a failure, devastating the lives of just about everybody involved. This is David who has remained anonymous until now, only known in the medical journals as Jon Joan. And this is Janet Rymer, David's mother, who made the agonizing decision to change the sex of her son and to raise him as a girl. And what you all at home didn't see during the taping of that piece, we could tell, Janet, you were, you know, moved and probably disturbed by what you're saying. And, David, you you comfort Speaker 1: her. It's, Speaker 2: she's hurting right now. Mothers are All over the world, we're all alike. There's guilt. It's darned if you do and darned if you don't. Mhmm. You know? With things that were done were done out of compassion, Out of love for your child? Mhmm. How can I hate my mother for that? Mhmm. Speaker 0: Did you think he would hate you? Speaker 1: Yes, I did. Mhmm. Speaker 0: Did you hate yourself? Speaker 1: Yes. Mhmm. Speaker 0: So you talk on the tape about the day you first put the dress on. Did you have agonizing feelings about it even when the doctor or were you of that generation or the kind of person when the doctor said this would be best. Did you all believe that it Speaker 1: would be best? Yes. I had complete faith in the doctor. Mhmm. I believed it would be best, But when he started to rip it off, I started to have doubts. And during the whole Journey of trying to create a feminine being. There were doubts along the way, But I couldn't afford to contemplate them because I couldn't afford to be wrong. I couldn't face Speaker 0: the alternative. And the alternative being what? That you'd made this horrible mistake? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Because then what could you do? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Since you since your earliest memories, you never felt like you were a boy a girl? Speaker 2: I never quite fit in. Well, the girls would do their things with their Barbies and things like that, and That wouldn't interest me. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: And, things such as trucks and, building forts And, you know, getting into the odd fist fight and climbing trees. That's the kind of stuff that I like, but it was unacceptable, so I'd never As Speaker 0: a girl? Speaker 2: As as a girl, I had no place to to fit in. Speaker 1: So what would you Speaker 0: say to, David, who was then your what would you say to him when he would act out his maleness? Speaker 1: I would try and convince him that he was doing it because he was a tomboy Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And that it was okay to be himself or herself, I would say, at the time. It was okay to be herself, but she was very much a tomboy. Mhmm. Speaker 2: I tried to fit in. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: I I tried with the with the makeup, and it it Turned out to be a disaster. I mean, you got the, you know, the the red the red circles on the cheeks and, look I looked like a clown, basically. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: And, but I didn't do it because I liked it. I did it because I wanted so desperately to fit in because I was so lonely, And I let 1 boy kiss me on my cheek once, and I thought about it. Said, no. I don't like this. No. That's it. I can't help that. You know? I am what I am. Speaker 0: Did you feel you you when you say I am what I am, but you didn't know what that was? Speaker 2: I wasn't here.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

In the end, the burden imposed upon David proved too much and he took his life in a grocery store parking lot with a single shotgun blast to the head. His twin brother Brian also committed suicide. With this in mind let’s look at the man behind this tragedy, John Money.

Video Transcript AI Summary
On May 4th, 2004, David Reimer, 38, tragically took his own life in a supermarket car park. The police arrived at his door around 10:30 at night, and despite his desperate pleas, he ended his life by shooting himself with a shotgun.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On May 4th 2004. 38 year old David Reimer drove into a supermarket car park. Speaker 1: 10:30 at night, the police came to the door. I think I was screaming no. No. No. Speaker 0: As he sat in his car, He put a shotgun to his head and pulled the trigger.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Not knowing what to do with her son who had experienced a horrific circumcision, David’s mother turned to John Money after seeing him on TV.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Plastic surgery couldn't help Bruce Reimer, but then the Reimer family saw hope in a TV show featuring Dr. John Money, a pioneer in sex change surgery. Dr. Money, charismatic and confident, had brought a transsexual woman who had undergone the procedure. This gave the Reimers hope, and they reached out to Dr. Money. He suggested turning their baby son into a girl, and it seemed like the solution they were looking for. However, it wasn't just the Reimers who needed Dr. Money's help; he saw them as an answer to his own prayers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the time, plastic surgery was not advanced enough to help Bruce Reimer. Speaker 1: Only a few weeks ago, Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore announced it was opening a gender identity clinic expressly for people who wanted to change their sex. Doctor John Money, a psychologist Speaker 0: Then several months later, The Reimer family saw something on television that made them feel hopeful for the first time since the accident. Speaker 1: Doctor Money Speaker 0: Doctor John Money, originally from New Zealand, was a pioneer in the astonishing new field of sex change surgery. Speaker 2: Doctor Money, it's still a pretty drastic procedure, isn't it? Well, Speaker 1: it's a drastic procedure by your standards and mine. Speaker 2: Your money was on there, and he was very charismatic. He was very he seemed very highly intelligent and very Confident of what he was saying. Speaker 0: Doctor Money had brought a transsexual with him. A man who had been changed into a woman. As a Speaker 2: matter of fact, You've never been in it? The transsexual certainly made an impact because she was a very Feminine seeming woman. And I thought, Here's our answer, here's our salvation, here's our hope. Speaker 0: Janet wrote to doctor Money after the show ended. He replied promptly. When they met, Doctor Money suggested that the Reymers could turn their baby son into a baby girl. It looked as if Ron and Janet had solved the problem. But it wasn't just that doctor Money was the answer to the rymer's prayers. They were the answer to his.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Indeed Money’s prayers were answered in the form of the twins. He needed a way to prove his theory, the same theory being taught in schools as if it is a scientifically proven fact. The theory of Gender Identity.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Money believed that a baby's upbringing determines their gender identity more than their genes. He based this theory on his research with intersex individuals, who have both male and female physical characteristics. However, some argued that this theory might not apply to all children due to hormonal differences in the womb. To prove his hypothesis, Dr. Money needed two ordinary boys for an experiment: one would be raised as a girl, and the other would remain a boy. This opportunity arose with the Rhymer twins.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Money had developed a radical new theory about nature versus nurture and how these twin forces affect whether we think of ourselves as a girl or a boy. He thought that while genes are important, as far as its gender is concerned, a baby is essentially neutral for the 1st 2 years of life. During these critical 2 years, the child's upbringing, how it is nurtured, will determine whether it feels masculine or feminine. Doctor Money had developed this theory from his research with hermaphrodites, people now known as intersex who are physically both male and female. I have some very fascinating pairs of cases that have taught me a lot and of course, have taught other people a lot Indirectly too. But intersex children are not necessarily the same as other children. They receive different amounts of hormones in the womb. So some argued that doctor Money's hypothesis might not be true for all children. To prove that nurture is more important than nature would require an extraordinary experiment. Doctor Money needed 2 ordinary boys. 1 would be raised as a girl. The other would remain a boy. Doctor Money now had the perfect opportunity. The Rhymer twins.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Money conducted many sessions with David and the subsequent recordings were released detailing what was discussed. Early on Money learned that David was not accepting of the identity imposed on him.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Money used the original transcripts of interviews to support his theory that a boy could be raised as a girl successfully. In one session, he asked who the boss was, and Brian, the boy, was identified as the boss. When asked if he fought back, Brian said yes, while Brenda, the girl, said no because girls don't fight back. Doctor Money's theory gained attention worldwide, suggesting that nurture was more important than nature in determining gender identity. However, the Reimer family, whose daughter underwent a sex change, was unaware of Doctor Money's claims. Brenda exhibited masculine behavior, contradicting the supposed success of the gender change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Horizon has used the original transcripts of these interviews. This is what really happened, and these are the actual words doctor Money and the children used. In this session, doctor Money's theory seemed to be working. Speaker 1: Tell me, which one of you is the boss? Speaker 2: Brian is the boss because he is a boy. Speaker 1: Brian, are you the boss? Speaker 2: I don't know. Speaker 1: The boys start to fight. Do you fight back or do you run away? Speaker 2: I fight back. Speaker 1: I guess Brenda fights back too sometimes. Do you, Brenda? Speaker 2: Nope. Because I'm a girl. Speaker 3: You're a girl. Speaker 2: I'm not a boy. Girls don't fight back, do they? Girls can't hit very hard but boys can. Speaker 0: In 1972, when Brenda Rimer was 7 years old, Doctor Money announced to the world how successful his theory was, that a boy, if given the correct upbringing, could be turned into a girl. Speaker 3: Her behavior as a little girl is in remarkable contrast to the little boy behavior of her identical twin brother. Doctor Money's book, Speaker 0: Man and boy, woman and girl was reviewed all over the world. Speaker 3: The girl wanted and received for Christmas dolls, A dollhouse and a doll carriage, clearly related to the maternal aspect of the female adult role. Speaker 0: Doctor Money's idea became known as the theory of gender neutrality. It seemed to be proof of one of the great issues in science. As far as gender identity was concerned, nurture was more important than nature. Speaker 1: It makes it very exciting, don't you think, to live in an age of of discovery of human personality this way? Speaker 0: But back in Canada, the Reimer family were unaware that doctor Money was triumphantly describing their daughter's sex change as a Success Life was rather different for the Reymers. Brenda was behaving in a distinctly masculine manner.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Not to be deterred and fixated on his demented theory Money moves forward and did so in a way many would consider inappropriate to say the least.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Before publicizing Brenda's case, there were concerns about potential problems. Speaker 1: Brenda showed extreme negativism and aggression during her visits. Doctor Money attempted to make her accept her new gender by discussing the differences between male and female genitalia. Speaker 2: Doctor Money asked Brenda intimate questions to help her understand the distinction between boys and girls. Speaker 3: The questions were explicit and made me uncomfortable. However, some argue that focusing on genitalia was scientifically correct at the time. Speaker 2: Knowing a child's gender based on their genital appearance is important and commonly used clinically. Note: The concise transcript is within the 150-word limit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even before he publicized Brenda's case as a success, he was aware that there could be some problems. Speaker 1: From this evidence and others, I would say there's not much chance of talking this girl into a change of mind. This negativism was the most extreme she displayed on this visit. Last time, she was almost maniacal in the way she hit, kicked and otherwise attacked people are not altogether a playful manner. Speaker 0: According to doctor Money's theory, But it is possible to raise a boy as a girl. Brenda needed to believe that she was female. So the year after his book was published, doctor Money tried to make her accept her new gender by focusing on the difference Between a girl's and a boy's genitalia. He began by asking her a series of intimate questions. Speaker 1: Now I've got a good question for you. What? How do you tell the difference between a boy and a girl? Speaker 2: Well, a girl has long hair and a boy has short hair. Speaker 1: What if I have short hair and you have short hair? Speaker 2: Well, I I have a dress and you have pants. Speaker 1: Yes, there could be a way, but there is another way. What? Take their clothes off. What about a baby when it has no clothes on? How can you tell whether it's a boy or a girl? Speaker 2: I don't Speaker 1: know. Well, I'll help you. You have a look down here between the legs. Right? How is a girl and how is a boy down there? What is the difference? Speaker 2: Relax. Speaker 1: A boy has a penis for peeing through, like a little sausage, What does a girl have? Speaker 2: I don't know. Speaker 1: She has it flat. A boy doesn't have that. They're both different. They're both different. Speaker 3: The top of questions that we were asked were sexual in nature to the point where it'd make me blush, if I would think of talking that way about to my to my son, I'd be very embarrassed. It is very explicit. But the sexual parts Speaker 0: There is no doubt that Brenda found doctor Money's approach Distressing. But his supporters argue that focusing on genitalia was a scientifically correct procedure at the time. Speaker 2: It's a very important issue with children to know whether they are boys or girls or male or female by the appearance of their genitalia. I mean, this is the insignia, if you will, that distinguishes boys and girls. And it's very commonly used clinically. Certainly, I do as well.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Money became more and more inappropriate showing a 7 year old photos of woman giving birth to show “Brenda” what female genitalia was. Not only that he found it appropriate to discuss sex reassignment surgery with the child making him very uncomfortable.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brenda was shown explicit birth photos to make her understand her gender, which shocked her as a young child. Doctor Money then tried to convince her to have surgery to construct a vagina, but Brenda was uncomfortable with the idea. She was told that the surgery would fix her genitalia and make it easier for her to pee. Brenda was scared and didn't understand why she needed surgery when she felt perfectly fine. She believed that the surgery would change her for the worse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To try and make Brenda understand that she was a girl, doctor Money showed her a book called 2 births. It contained explicit photographs of women giving birth and was clearly shocking for a young child. Speaker 1: I thought he was perverted. I thought he was a sick man. My parents didn't know a lot that was going on. And if they would've known, that would never would've happened. Speaker 0: With Brenda still resisting her female gender, doctor Money then had to adopt a more extreme approach. He thought that the only way he could make Brenda accept a feminine identity would be if her rudimentary vulva looked more like a normal girl's genitalia. He therefore tried to persuade her to have a vagina constructed. Brenda, however, was clearly uncomfortable with the idea of having surgery. Speaker 2: And that reminds me of something else I want to tell you about. You know already the way you're made down there. You're not exactly the same as other girls. Well, I have a message for you about Here at the hospital, we can fix it up and make it look like it's supposed to be. Fix it up so that when you sit down to pee, it goes straight down the bowl instead of How would you be when you're ready for that? Speaker 0: I don't know. Speaker 1: How old are Speaker 2: you now? 7. Well, maybe if you feel okay by the time you're 8 years old, we can let the doctor in the white coat have a look down there. He's the one who do the operation to fix it up. Last year, a man had a look down there. Maybe next year, it'll be okay to let the other doctor have a look down Why don't fix it up? Speaker 0: Why would I do that? Speaker 2: You don't have to if you don't want to. When would be a good age for the operation? 13. 13? I'll see about that. Might be a bit late. Speaker 0: Although the theory behind the operation made sense, Brenda was horrified at the prospect. Speaker 1: I was scared to death. I figured, you know, I was perfectly fine. My my heart was fine. Nothing old with my kidneys. What do I need surgery for? And I I thought Deep down inside, that if I went through this surgery, it would change me somehow for the worse.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The abuse grew even more vile when Money made David and his brother pose nude in sexual positions so that he could take photographs. The photographs are said to be held at the Kinsey Institute and have never been allowed release.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 instructs someone to undress and points out the difference between Brian and the listener. Speaker 1 acknowledges being flat-chested. Speaker 2 shares that they were forced to undress and have photos taken when their parents weren't around. They suspect that these incidents may be documented in files held by doctor Money. Speaker 1 suggests that if these incidents occurred, they may be in files that doctor Money refuses to release. Speaker 2 confirms having personal files buried, including photos taken while nude. Speaker 1 mentions that the family was unaware of doctor Money's behavior, and the twins only disclosed their experiences as adults. Speaker 0 expresses horror upon learning about doctor Money's actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take your clothes off now. Good. What's the difference? Look down there. What does Brian have? A penis. Right. And what do you have? Speaker 1: Flat is flat. Speaker 0: That's right. That's how you know you're a girl. Stay here. I'm gonna take a couple of photographs. Don't move. Speaker 2: When my folks weren't around, well, then, we did what we were told, and if we didn't, then We got yelled at to the point where we thought we're gonna get backhanded. If we were told to take our clothes off, Well, eventually, we took our clothes off and sat on the couch, had photos of us taken. Speaker 1: If this incident took place, It may have been reported in files that doctor Money gave to the Kinsey Institute and which he will not allow to be released. Speaker 2: I have 2 years of my files that are buried, and those are the same files where I was on the couch, nude, getting photographed into positions. So he can sit there and pin himself Rosie all he wants. I know better. Speaker 1: If doctor Mani did indeed behave like this, The family were unaware. The twins only revealed their experiences when they were adults. Speaker 0: David told us what doctor Mani had done long after we I had stopped seeing him, and we were horrified. We thought, how could this happen to children?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

By the time David was thirteen Money started pressuring him to have the surgery, something David was adamantly opposed to. Money even brought in an adult Transgender person to help him convince David. This was David’s last session with Money.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Money concluded the interview by discussing the concept of gender identity. He acknowledged that it can be difficult for individuals to talk about their gender identity, whether they identify as male or female, boy or girl, or man or woman. Many people have come to his office with similar feelings, unable to discuss this important aspect of their lives. Dr. Money assured the person being interviewed that he would be the one person in the world they could confide in.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happened next as doctor Money concluded their interview? I wanna tell you one more thing. When you talk about your identity, be male or female, boy or girl, man or woman, That's called your gender identity, and that's a very, very tough thing for you to talk about. Now I've had not just a few but many people come into this office with exactly the same feelings as you have. There's something you you cannot talk about and yet it's the most important thing in your life. Are we finished? Thanks for talking. I want you to know I'm gonna be the 1 person in the world you can tell anything to.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Unbeknownst to David and his family even though Money knew his experiment and theory proved to be an utter failure, he began publicizing it as a resounding success. Academia as well as the press gushed over what they believed to be a successful transition. This angered David and he went public. The publicity eventually led to both David and his brother Brian’s death via suicide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
David and Brian, twins who were subjects of a controversial experiment by Dr. Money, decided to speak out against him after realizing he had falsely portrayed their case as a success. They wanted to prevent others from going through the same trauma. The experiment involved inappropriate sexual positions and taking pictures of them when they were just 7 years old. However, after the documentary was aired, Brian's mental health worsened. David visited him frequently, trying to provide support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then something happened that would have a terrible effect on both twins. David discovered that doctor Money had continued to publicize his case as a success, proof that you could raise a boy as a girl. Speaker 1: And I was appalled, disgusted, and angry when I heard about it because there was nothing further than the truth. You're a cute little boy. Speaker 0: 3 decades after this misguided experiment began To prevent others being traumatized in the same way, David persuaded Brian to go public with him and speak about their ordeal. David said we have to do this and stop doctor Manny from doing what he's doing. He's ruined our lives. We can't let him loo ruin anymore. So Brian agreed Speaker 1: The experiments that he made us do, going into sexual positions with no clothes on, taking pictures of us. How degrading For 7 year old. Speaker 0: But once the documentary was broadcast, Bryan's mental health deteriorated. Speaker 1: In a quarter? David used to come here quite often, bring him flowers And I guess I don't know exactly what he talked about but he came here and he talked to him Quite a few times. It must have been at least 4 or 5 times a week.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

To this day John Money is praised and lionized by advocates of this pernicious ideology based on a theory proven to be fraudulent and yet here we are. What you have just learned is the truth and mustn’t be ignored any longer. This ideology is ripping families apart and tearing at the fabric of society itself. Unless good people stand up and oppose this on a mass scale, it will subsume everything, leaving broken children and families in its wake, just as it did with patient zero, David Reimer.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you would like to learn more about this history, I wrote an article about it here. https://www.thepublica.com/transgenderism-went-mainstream-now-its-coming-for-our-children/

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Finally, if you’ve found this information valuable please consider giving me a follow so you can catch more threads in the future like these. 👇🏻 https://t.co/DPSWDdMVt9

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a list of all of my threads so far for ease of access. I appreciate the support, more to come. Thread Topics 🧵 1. COVID-19 Vaccines 💉 2. VAERS📉 3. The PCR “Test”🧪 4. Masks 😷 5. Lockdowns 🔒 6. mRNA Approval for Kids 💉 7. Post 💉 Autopsies 8. Excess Death💀

Saved - January 30, 2024 at 1:14 PM

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Meet Elizabeth Johanna Olson-Kennedy who works at Children’s Hospital LA and specializes in “gender affirming care”. Keep in mind this was 2015, listen how she flippantly talks about surgery on minors like it’s no big deal. Show this to anyone who denies it is happening. https://t.co/03tNhqEPPQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a study of 101 young people seeking cross-sex hormones, all participants were able to access hormones. The study also found that 30% of the participants experienced moderate to severe depression symptoms, while 49% had thoughts of suicide and over 30% had attempted suicide. Many of the young people engaged in drug use and some had resorted to sex work for basic needs. Homelessness and foster care were also prevalent among the participants. The speaker then discusses the topic of gender confirmation surgeries for minors, stating that it is understandable for teenagers to desire such procedures. Chest surgery for transgender boys is seen as critical and relatively easy compared to general reconstruction surgeries. The speaker believes that the barrier of surgical sterilization can be overcome and emphasizes the life-saving nature of chest surgery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is actually from a cohort of young people in my practice. 101 young people, new to cross sex hormones, all in the generative way, all desiring to go on hormones. And all of them did by the way in a surprising turn of events. Oh. Alright. This is other baseline Yeah. From the young people in my practice and and this is talking about, sort of the other mental health things that are happening for people. So 30% of my sample had moderate to severe depression symptoms. Thought about How about suicide? 49, 51%, and attempted suicide over 30%. And a lot of drug use. I mean, in LA, I'll give you that. A lot of kids were sexually active and then not an insignificant number 9 of my kids had actually done sex economy. Sex work or place to live or something to eat. I didn't actually, show you in this in this slide a lot of young people in my practice experience homelessness, precarious housing, and we've been in foster care. Let's talk about a hot topic. Gender confirmation circuits and minors. Okay? This is something that's Coming on the horizon, probably your kids are all gonna ask you about it after our talk to doctor Joe section. Sorry. So this The idea that a 14 or 15 year old would want a vagina they identified as a girl is really not that out there. It's actually pretty understandable. Surgery, chest surgery for trans guys as minors is critical and it's available. It's not nearly as difficult as general reconstruction because it doesn't have anything to do with sterilization. The difficulty of general surgery is that It is surgical sterilization and people get super worked up about that. And that is the barrier that we have to overcome. And I think we're going to. But chest is not that. It actually is, and it's a very easy, safe, relatively fast procedure that is absolutely life saving.
Saved - August 18, 2023 at 10:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prominent figures in gender identity theory have been linked to the sexualization of children. John Money, a sexologist, believed pedophilia was harmless and promoted child pornography. Chemical castration, pioneered by Money, is now used on children via puberty blockers. The trans movement's fixation on children's bodies and the involvement of groups like WPATH raise questions about the motives behind halting puberty. Activist Peter Tatchell has also been associated with advocating for questioning ages of consent. Aimee Challenor, despite his father's conviction for child abuse, held influential positions and advised organizations like Stonewall. These disturbing connections highlight the need for scrutiny and protection of children.

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

This is the most astonishing interview. Graham Linehan (@Glinner) has been vindicated over and over regarding the medical abuse of children by gender clinics, and he's correctly pointed out that central figures within “gender identity” theorizing have sexualized children. For starters, John Money: American sexologist and psychologist from New Zealand who practiced at Johns Hopkins, considered the first to coin the terms “gender identity” and “gender role.” Money believed pedophilia was a harmless sexuality, and he promoted pornography as a means for young children to develop their sense of a “gender identity.” In a 1991 interview for the pro-pedophile journal Paidika, Money is quoted as saying: “If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way.” Chemical castration, pioneered by John Money as a treatment for pedophiles, is now being practiced on children via “puberty blockers,” and most mainstream media have failed to ask crucial questions, such as, who benefits from halting puberty, and why the trans movement is so fixated on children's bodies. Or, why it is that the leading lobbying group on this issue, WPATH, worked with members of a sadomasochistic fetish forum who wrote graphic sexual stories about castrating children.

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

In 1986, Tatchell contributed a chapter to a book called “Betrayal of Youth” compiled by Warren Middleton, former vice-chairman of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), which argued for “questioning ages of majority and ages of consent”. PIE, which for a decade advocated for adult-minor sexual relationships to be decriminalized and called for abolishing the age of consent, was disbanded in 1984, and several prominent members were arrested for child sexual abuse offenses - including Middleton, whose real name was John Parratt. https://reduxx.info/uk-london-police-partners-with-lgbt-activist-who-defended-sex-with-children/ https://theguardian.com/uk/2011/jul/15/paedophiles-jailed-child-abuse-drawings

UK: London Police Partners with LGBT Activist Who Defended "Sex with Children" - Reduxx London’s Metropolitan Police have announced that they are partnering with LGBT activist Peter Tatchell and his organization, the Peter Tatchell Foundation, in an effort to provide LGBT+ Community Liaison Officers to citizens interacting with the police service. The move has prompted concern on social media with critics pointing to Tatchell’s extensive history of pedophile apologism, […] reduxx.info
Paedophiles jailed after 3,000 child abuse drawings found Scotland Yard describes case as landmark after ringleader convicted for making drawings of children being raped theguardian.com

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

"Certainly, in the realm of sexual ages of consent, we need to ask whether the law has any legitimate role to play in criminalising consenting, victimless sexual activity," Tatchell wrote. Other chapters in the book covered child pornography and prostitution, incest and “how to make paedophilia more acceptable.” He later tried to distance himself from this book by claiming he was “conned” into contributing. However, at the time, Tatchell praised the book in a review he penned for The Communist Party of Great Britain. https://reduxx.info/uk-london-police-partners-with-lgbt-activist-who-defended-sex-with-children/

UK: London Police Partners with LGBT Activist Who Defended "Sex with Children" - Reduxx London’s Metropolitan Police have announced that they are partnering with LGBT activist Peter Tatchell and his organization, the Peter Tatchell Foundation, in an effort to provide LGBT+ Community Liaison Officers to citizens interacting with the police service. The move has prompted concern on social media with critics pointing to Tatchell’s extensive history of pedophile apologism, […] reduxx.info

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

"In August 2018 Aimee's father, David Challenor, was found guilty of torturing and raping a 10-year-old girl in the attic of the family's Coventry home. Images of child abuse, including photographs of Challenor and his victim, were found in the house and on Challenor’s computer and camera. It emerged that Challenor senior committed his crimes while dressed as a little girl, wearing baby-doll dresses and nappies... Not only did [Aimee] Challenor hold tremendous sway in a major political party, he often appeared in the press and was given a regular media platform. Furthermore, even after the revelations about his father and husband-to-be, Challenor was on the Stonewall trans advisory board until as late as July 2019. He was advising the charity which provides training for schools, public bodies and innumerable businesses." https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/ashton-challenor-the-boy-who-disappeared

Ashton Challenor, the boy who disappeared By JL grahamlinehan.substack.com

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

🧵 https://t.co/9rf74CPYBa

@WomenReadWomen - Genevieve Gluck

Rosanna Lockwood literally deferred to a paedophile apologist who was published alongside PIE after dunking on Graham Linehan for saying the media protects paedophiles

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 4:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gender dysphoria, once known as transsexualism or gender identity disorder, was considered a mental illness in the 20th century. However, in 2013, the American Psychiatric Association changed the terminology in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness, renaming it gender dysphoria. Without medical interventions, it essentially refers to crossdressing. (Source: rumble.com)

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Tucker Carlson - How a Mental Illness Turned into Gender Dysphoria or Transgenderism Most of the 20th century, “Transgenderism” or “Gender Dysphoria” use to be identified as a Mental Illness, called Transsexualism or Gender Identity Disorder. In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association amended DSM (Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Illness)… In this amendment, they alternated the Nomenclature so that transsexualism or gender identity disorder became gender dysphoria. If you remove the pharmaceuticals, the surgeries, you’re left with a cross-dressing transvestite. https://rumble.com/v3n1zlm-tucker-carlson-how-cross-dressing-turned-into-gender-dysphoria.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
In order for therapies for gender dysphoria to become mainstream, the definition of the condition needs to change. In the past, transgenderism was considered a mental illness and treated as such. However, in 2013, the American Psychiatric Association changed the nomenclature from transsexualism or gender identity disorder to gender dysphoria. This change removed the term "transsexual" and shifted the focus away from pharmaceuticals and surgeries. Without these interventions, the condition is essentially reduced to being a transvestite or cross dresser. This was the understanding of the condition for many years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I ask you a question? So in order for all of these therapies to become mainstream, you have to change the definition of gender dysphoria from something that you treat, a problem, a psychiatric illness, you have to change it from that to something very different. Speaker 1: In fact, the clinical history shows just that. So in 1952, the first sex reassignment surgery happened. I believe at Johns Hopkins with a patient named Christine Jorgensen. It was very big news at the time. And then about 10 years later, Johns Hopkins established the 1st gender clinic for purposes of performing surgery assignment surgeries. But for most of the 20th century and that's in the post war period, transgenderism or gender dysphoria as it's become known was deemed to be a mental illness. It was called transsexualism or gender identity disorder. And this was kind of the basis for understanding treatment and it was deemed to be psychiatric. However, in 2013, the American Psychiatric Association amended DSM. DSM is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illness. And in this change, They altered the nomenclature of the condition such that transsexualism or gender identity disorder became gender dysphoria. And what's significant about this change Speaker 0: This is why the term transsexual, which was the term of art that people used, all people on all sides of the question, has disappeared. Of course. Speaker 1: And well, I mean, let's face it. If you remove the pharmaceuticals. If you remove the surgeries, what are you left with? You're left with a transvestite, right. You're left with a cross dresser. Right. And that's it. And that's what it was for decades and decades.
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 9:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A detransitioner has filed a lawsuit against Dr. Jason Rafferty, Dr. Michelle Forcier, Thundermist Health Clinic, and others. The plaintiff, LU, had multiple psychiatric disorders and sought help from Thundermist. LU experienced negative effects from testosterone treatment, including physical and emotional distress. LU is now suing for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent. The lawsuit highlights the importance of thorough evaluation and informed decision-making in gender-affirming care.

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

IMPORTANT: 🚨🚨🚨 A detransitioner has just filed a lawsuit against Dr. Jason Rafferty, Dr. Michelle Forcier, Thundermist Health Clinic, and others. This is a major development, as Rafferty is the author of the @AmerAcadPeds policy statement on "gender-affirming care." 🧵

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

The plaintiff, LU, had multiple psychiatric disorders, including dissociative identity disorder, ADHD, OCD, and bipolar disorder, when she sought help from Thundermist Health Clinic in Rhode Island.

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

She had just "escaped from over 18 years of physical, sexual, and psychological torment at the hands of a cult and its leadership, which began for her around age 6." Among other things, the cult had subjected her to conversion therapy to try to "cure" her of being lesbian.

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

In his clinical notes, Rafferty acknowledged: LU's "current goals are for... (testosterone) and 'top surgery' but describes internal turmoil between alters [multiple personalities] about meaning of gender identity that likely requires additional support and exploration."

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

Rafferty nevertheless approved her for hormones, stating: "it is this provider’s perspective that Testosterone would be indicated based on history, and with essential psychological supports in place."

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

After a brief hormone high period (T is thought to have antidepressant properties), LU "began experiencing dangerous mood swings, fits of anger, more frequent bouts of depression, and feeling even more disconnected from herself and her sexuality than she was prior to the [T]."

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

"The facial hair and other bodily responses to the testosterone were more severe than advertised, and she quickly realized that the treatment was not going as promised."

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

When LU inquired about discontining T, she was met with "cold, disinterested apathy" from Rafferty, according to the complaint. Thundermist allegedly provided her transportation to & from the clinic when she wanted to transition, but not when she wanted to detransition.

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

After seeing Michelle Forcier, who also ignored the red flags and approved her for T, LU moved out of state and began receiving mental health therapy. This helped her "see that her desire for a male body was not gender dysphoria but body dysmorphia brought about by...

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

a late puberty, childhood bullying, trauma from sexual assaults, and an unhealthy perspective that she could never achieve the beauty of all the women she encountered on social media and TV." By that point, however, the damage from T was done.

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

LU now suffers from "body disfigurement, ongoing estrogen deficiencies, painful premenstrual dysphoric disorder, suspected osteoporosis, development of painful skin nodules from testosterone injection sites, an onset of severe histamine sensitivity resulting in...

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

chronic severe allergies, suspected infertility, reduced sex drive, chronic hot flashes, genital pain and discomfort, chronic joint pain, and a host of emotional and/or psychological injuries including newly onset body dysmorphia,...

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

as to the changes testosterone brought about her body, [and] significant emotional distress impacting many of her relationships."

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

LU is represented by @detranslaw, a boutique law firm specializing in gender medicine, and is suing for medical malpractice, gross negligence, and lack of informed consent.

@LeorSapir - Leor Sapir

This thread is based on the legal filing, but there is also a piece about the lawsuit in the Daily Mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12654975/Detransitioner-multiple-personality-gender-reassignment.html

De-transitioner with multiple personalities slams doctors for therapy A North Carolina lesbian slammed doctors who led her down a path of transitioning as a 'fractured and unstable' adolescent, despite suffering from multiple personality disorder. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 10:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The hearings for BC Nurse Amy Hamm resume with Dr. James Cantor as an expert witness. Cantor discusses the shift from gatekeeping to informed consent model in gender dysphoria intervention. He highlights Europe's rejection of treatments under informed consent and the importance of avoiding conflicts of interest in developing guidelines. Cantor also addresses the lack of strong evidence for the benefits of transition and the complexities surrounding the informed consent model for minors. He emphasizes the need for comprehensive mental health assessment and support before medical transition. Cantor raises concerns about social media influence, the risks for young gay men and women, and the need for objective evaluation in decision-making. He discusses the limitations of studies on minority stress and the potential misdiagnosis of gender dysphoria in individuals with borderline personality disorder. Cantor concludes by questioning the effectiveness of trigger warnings and misgendering taboos.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Hearings for BC Nurse Amy Hamm @preta_6 begin again at 1pm est/10am pacific today. #FreeSpeech Will @JamesCantorPhD (one of Canada's top researchers in atypical sexuality & paraphilias) be accepted as an expert witness for Hamm? find out w/ me. I'll be🧵ing

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

and we're back on the record... @bastow_karen opens. It seems that Cantor has been accepted as an expert witness & will be examined by Bastow then subject to cross examination. Next Witness will be Amy Hamm, and @LDBildy will be calling witnesses for Hamm next week.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Dr James Cantor is taking the virtual stand, swearing in. Bastow taking Cantor through his report prepared for the Amy Hamm hearings: Some repetition of the qualification process as Cantor testifies now to his qualifications. BARBARA FINDLAY objects to Cantor's statement of qualifications... Panel ruling was to limit testimony to gender dysphoria and gender identity Bastow qualifies her opening question: Cantor is entitled to testify to his overall experience but Bastow will limit to GD and Gender Identity expertise

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: Diagnostic criteria for intervention for GD has changed in the last twenty years. Quote: "Standards are not standards if they are open to interpretation" We moved away from gatekeeping model (attempts to mitigate harm was a long process of months or years living as desired self) to an informed consent model. There is no strong evidence for benefits for intervention in transition. This must be Informed consent model is a general model for physically evidenced disease. Is the person cognitively capable of making decisions?

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: does the informed consent model apply kids under 16 in Canada? Cantor: it's complicated. Generally requires the involvement of parents unless parents do not consent... Bastow: asking about US gatekeeping... moves on to Europe... FINDLAY (objection): asks that Dr. Cantor/panel to restrict testimony to Canada and the US models Bastow responds: Science is not limited by geography. Science is not confined by the legal jurisdictions. Decisions of other countries are relevant to the testimony. Panel stands down for five minutes.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Panel agrees that Bastow can pursue the question: "can you advise us on the position of various European countries over 16 and under 16 - and whether models have changed in this are since 1998." Europe has gone in opposite direction of Canada and US. Originally went in the same direction but quickly realized treatments were not having the desired organizations. Europe rejectected WPATH and activist positions and now explicitly reject treatments under informed consent. Is exact opposite direction of Canada and US. Europe has controlled for and removed people with conflict of interest... Cantor points out well-known conflict of interest are both financial and biased towards benefiting certain specialties

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor elucidating on conflict of interests - if practitioners and clinics are positioned to benefit from the medical interventions and they are the only ones creating the guidelines. Europe has figured this out and is having reviews independent of the specialties that benefit from financial and intellectual conflict of interest. Conflicted groups in the US are coming up with policies that benefit them. These specialties should not be in charge of developing guidelines. My words: this is like putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

WPATH uses sketchy language to describe development of policies and conflict of interest. Claims no-one is in a conflict of interest at WPATH. Bastow: Q re: conflict of interest Cantor: WHO and National Academy counts that being the recipient of a grant in a specialty, or providing services in this speciality puts the recipient in a conflict of interest for policy development. This means that WPATH development of guidelines is outside of internationally recognized rules of conflict of interest.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: Can you elaborate on change of demographic. Cantor: occurred in every country. the change exploded in 2012 (coincidentally?) was same year WPATH changed guidelines. Demographic changes Europe, US and Canada, explosive change was primarily in youth, was mostly male who would grow to young gay men. the change was mostly male for several decades, after social media it became a different cohort, biologically female, early adolescent and onset of puberty Different mental health profile. Can't assume the same protocols used for previous cohort should apply Also the male presenting adults, AGPs after 2012, no longer subject to gatekeeping either.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: why is gatekeeping important with AGP? Cantor: it is well established that biological men, adult onset GD have a sexual interest pattern that is more unusual than being gay or lesbian, men attracted to self as female. unlike gay kids effeminate, these are often married straight. AGP occurs with other sexual interests, clinical question: are men taking advantage of transgender identities in order to act out their other interests like exibitionism or sadist taking advantage of the situation in order to enact the other What are the motivations of of the client? When self-identification is the only criteria and there is no objective evaluation then people can take advantage of society's willingness to embrace sexual diversity

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: have service levels increased or decreased Cantor: amount of energy has not gone down but there is a question of this is sapping away from resources for general mental health for, let's say, teenagers.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: Drugs, can you speak to the types of drugs and use of drugs in the treatment of gender dysphoria. Cantor: Lupron is same drug as the drugs used euphemistically as chemical castration drugs Primary long-term side-effects are bone density loss and osteoporosis.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: you've had experience in research design, also as senior scientist at CAMH - can you expand on designing research into sexual behaviour. Cantor, you've just described a course I might teach. From full range of scientific methods, from hardcore math and physics and design of questionnaires... Can tell you strengths and weaknesses of research designs.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor confirms he has reviewed Hamm's comments as well as investigative reports of Hamm's comments. Bastow: moving into new area... taking a break: return at 11:30/2:30 est

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Back on the record. #iStandWithAmyHamm Fellow Xweeps: what is important to you about the outcome of these hearings? Do you think if Hamm is exonerated this will make a difference in Canada and alleviate some of the fear related to being witch-hunted?

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: can you state your summary of opinions excepting redactions from your report Cantor: Opinions are are unchanged & the facts available regarding the importance of speaking out against their own clinics. American Academy of Pediatrics is subject to a lawsuit, and is undertaking a systematic evidence review Hamm's comments include statements that people don't want to hear, science and society must contain examples of speaking out about the issue and about science itself. growing evidence and growing voices critical of the practices

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: people are relying on perceptions and subjective feelings. People are preying on others based on emotions and claims of victimization. Bastow turning to: "No consensus among clinicians on best methods of treatment the primary theories of what's going on. Agreed Upon: enormous and increasing need for MH services, & many people presenting with GD People accept at face value vs people relying on objective evidence. So much emotion, so few experts, so much conflict of interest, & people are making decisions based on optics and political posturing. Public discussion consists of half truths, omissions of relevant information, Objectivity has come to opposite conclusion of what is popular. International orgs have come up with same conclusion, but US & Canada are opposite. Making decisions based on optics rather than verifiable truths.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Pyramid of Evidence Cantor: how to distinguish between good science and bad science one set of studies vs another set of studies for non-scientific boards of decision-makers. The purpose of the pyramid or levels of evidence is to rank quality of evidence. transition on demand relies on low-level studies. Ignore higher level studies that outrank the lower level studies. ie surveys correlation does not imply causation

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor compares magic ritual over crystals causing the a lucky day the next days to the quality of poor/low level studies. Correlation is not causation. Best evidence is from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Next a cohort study is taking a group and track them over time. We're seeing the same people over time so we get to watch for differences.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: No RCT studies have been conducted for treatment for GD. The best we have is the cohort study. The very highest level is the systematic reviews of evidence (meta study) Bastow: There is no evidence indicating any consensus. We can only tolerate strong risk when we have strong evidence. Bastow: could you comment on how gay men might be disadvantaged by current protocols. Cantor: unanimous studies show most effeminate boys grow out of dysphoria. Young gay men are put in danger by current policies. Bastow: how are women disempowered by current policies? Cantor: adult onset type (male attracted to women) are more ambiguous of what's motivating them interfering with women and their sense of safety. Bio males present more perceived risk. Locker rooms, adult males with atypical interest also exhibit more than one atypical sexual interterest. Impossible to know what the motivators are.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Bastow: how does ROGD relate to the disempowerment of women. Cantor: childhood onset strongly related to homosexuality; adult type strongly related to atypical sexualities. ROGD is a third group emerged with social media, at same time as spike in mental health issues in children in retrospect it seems obvious.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: people are generalizing treatments from other groups (childhood onset & adult onset) to the mostly female cohort of adolescent onset there is nothing to say that the treatments for one or both (very rare) classical types would work for the new very common presentation of teenage girls. Current policies are preventing young women from developing healthy identities that would be normal for young women.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

today is a hearing day for @preta_6 Amy Hamm's hearing Dr James Cantor testifying. Points out the definition of Experimental prevents insurers from paying for intervention. So Orgs like WPATH make assertions / opinions that these protocols are NOT experimental. Bastow: can you go through the terms of art about sex vs gender? Cantor: largely on Social Media, use sex and gender in ways not related to science Once can determine one's sex with a reliability better than almost any other trait difference. The definition of sex has been, many writers take the list of objective verifiable characteristics simply ad gender identity to the list of descriptors related to sex. "gender" has a long history of being defined in amorphous terms.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor now going into DSDs disorders of sexual development. Cantor goes into various presentations of DSDs. DSDs are exceptionally rare, less than 1/10th of 1% of we exclude hypospadia (a birth defect in males where the urethra does not open at the head of the penis)

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

We are back again with the hearings for @preta_6 with the BC College of Nurses & Midwives. There have been many developments in the issue in the public domain. One of them is the obvious correlation between gender activism & open anti-semitism of the radical woke cancel-cult left; another is the Angus Reid polling on the culture wars showing how small a population the cancelt cult left is. Back on the record:

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: Another correlation with the Adolescent Onset GD, they have other disorders, ASD, Personality Disorder and Histrionic Disorder. They have social functioning disorders developing healthy social functioning. not getting the same attention as the flashy, easy-to-retweet superficial interpretation of GD In science there is no such thing as inner sense. Science requires something be falsifiable. requires something basic to be scientifically verifiable. Even depression shows (vague) but verifiable patterns in brain scans, but self-reported gender identity cannot be verified. #IStandWithAmyHamm

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: Science has verified evidence of gay and lesbian brains, when we take groups and compare them, there is evidence of being shifted towards the opposite brain. Several studies have made mistakes when trying to verify a trans brain. "Confounding" problem examined mutli-variant subjects (gay and also trans) and confounded the differences. the conclusions in the studies could not be stated clearly because we couldn't verify gender identity in the brain. (I've been reading & studying on this subject for years and this is just the clearest articulation of this claims and science I've ever heard - partly why I'm taking these notes in detail)

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: integration of sexual orientation into society & integration gender identity into society are not the same. Orientation is one's private sexual behaviour life/private life. With integration into society, gender because it's a facet of social life, impacts the entire social group. Starts influencing interaction with others, requires public discourse and debate, very unlike sexaul orientation.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor on sports: Biological differences between men and women in sports. Endangers females in sports especially leaving out the idea of fairness and just speaking to physical issues. It's very much a recent issue. Dividing line is 2012 onset of social media, when adult transition mostly adult men transitioning, can't think of an individual prior to that of seeking participation in contact sports. If anything bio males would have preferred to avoid these kinds of activities the large-scale conversations FINDLAY objects. Says qualifications are insufficient for Cantor to comment on the participation of male-bodied people in sports. Bastow reads from ruling of the panel. FINDLAY: Has no qualification to comment on transwomen participating in sports. Bastow: Cantor is qualified to comment on hormonal differences and impacts and social impacts Panel is taking a moment to deliberate.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

why am I so interested in this topic asn speaking publicly? In 2008 my brother came out as trans in his 30s. Adult-Onset heterosexual male. no history of cross-sex identification. But history of other MH issues, including signs consistent with personality disorder and autism five 1/2 years ago I was alienated from my daughter by an affirming teacher and her mother (from whom I was divorced already for a number of years) My daughter has since medicalized, and recently changed from he/him pronouns to they/them.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

FINDLAY objects again about Cantor speaking on sports. Bastow moves Cantor on to regret from medicalized transitions and detransition Cantor: With adults, the changes that I've noticed with adults, the AGP pattern continues to be present. Things have become more ambiguous 18-20 years old not resembling adult features of transition the 18-20 are not representative of adult type and is a new phenomenon Brand new is Rapid Onset Type clustering of cases leading to the theory that a lot of adolescents cases fit the theory of social contagion... Outlines the susceptibility to social contagion... Socially Mediated Contagion online and occur in social clusters not in random isolated as in AGP and child onset

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: if we are to use medical interventions we must rule out that this is a social contagion. Causation vs Correlation Is GD in ROGD the result of other mental health issues, or the other way around people are using threats of sui--de and threats of threats. Suic--de ideation and sui--de are different. Death, sudden event by self, is mostly male, middle-age. Suicidality is a cry for help, significant and important, but is not an early stage of what will lead to death. exaggerated emotional blackmail. emotional manipulation in an unhealthy social interaction. Giving in is not in the interest of the person. begets still more demands and doesn't held deal with the distress. People are taking such threats at face value and referring to sex-changing kids and lifesaving. No redux of rates of suicice and sewercidality after transition, they stay elevated after transitions

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: best treatment is fulsome comprehensive mental health assessment and support PRIOR to any medical transition Note: Today FINDLAY is objecting on "leading questions" and unlike last week, she is being recognized by opposing counsel for fair objections. Bastow is rephrasing questions

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: sexual minority stress is theoretically an interpretation for an increase in suicidality though it is not the only or the best explanation of possibilities. no controlled studies to give the most simple and straightforward explanation.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: the kids who are most susceptible to this kind of social influence. Both GD and suic--lity are more likely caused by the same influences. ie social media Best course of action is psychotherapy

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: the ethically appropriate course is to start with the intervention that causes the least amount of physical impact, ie psychotherapy, and is the most ethical intervention. We have no idea what is medically necessary... FINDLAY: objects to discussion of social media and social media influence. it looked like a member of the panel face-palmed and shook her head. FINDLAY: pushes her objection... note this is quite the non-sequitur, but trying to limit testimony. says he offers no expertise to speak to social media impacts. Bastow: not sure we need an expert to tell us Social Media has had an impact on the world we live in. Panel recesses for afternoon break

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Amy Hamm hearings resume: Back on the record with testimony of @JamesCantorPhD For the record: #IStandWithAmyHamm Panel rules Cantor is permitted to speak to role of social media in this case. FINDLAY was overruled. Bastow asks for "Minority Stress" definition Cantor: set of additional stressors over that of mainstream society and causes poorer mental health issues. It is a legit hypothesis at an individual level but no evidence in science is present or available for Adolescent onset of GD. We are not seeing stresses resolving after medicalization - label is used as a panacea explanation is it being used as an emotional blackmail or manipulation

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: it is a violation of medical ethics when we cannot rule out the possibilities that MH improvements may be attributable to other causes besides treatment. We have a number of confounding factors (4) that may be giving indications that a hypothesis is is correct when it is not. Minority stress, once once starts controlling for other factors, don't have high quality studies to rule conclusions out. we can't make the conclusions that medical transition is the appropriate preventative for suicidal ideation due to minority stress. Bastow: very tolerant Sweden shows 19x higher suicide rates for post-transition people, lack of strong association between suicidality and transition. WPATH conceded that transition does not help to alleviate suicidality

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor on Borderline PD (personality disorder): has many different symptoms, based on a checklist #4 and #6 for diagnosis DSM #4 Repeated suicidal ideation and fantasies #6 unstable identity It's very easy for unstable identity to be confused with gender dysphoria. Very common for Suicidality in borderline PD. BPD is more common in females, teen onset, same sex ratio, same cohort, similar features to group that meets criteria that happens to match what people are seeing on social media wrt gender dysphoria.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

It's hard to imagine the panel might conclude that @preta_6 's public statements might be ruled inappropriate. @JamesCantorPhD raises so many evidenced-based inconsistencies in the facile narrative of the social media that the rainbow activists push so abusively that if the panel rules against Hamm, it really is evidence we're hopelessly corrupted by institutional capture.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: defining trauma in it's actual physical impact terms to the diluted or eroded meaning of the terms like "harms." Histrionic filters use the most evocative language possible to describe situations and circumstances. People with minor or imagined slights might use these things as claims to trauma and harm. People's explanations are being taken at face value. Fashionable to not ask questions and to accept people's explanations at face value.

@ShannonBDouglas - Shannon B - Weekly Canadian Gender Wars Co-Host

Cantor: trigger warnings might be doing more harms than helping. After a generation of experimenting with these things, it appears that it trigger warnings concretize one's sense of victims Bastow pivots to misgendering, nice move Cantor: there is a subset of people driven by attention-seeking... challenging it (misgendering) or using the opportunity to attract attention as a expert to which others must defer to give attention to the seeker Cantor: Trigger Warnings and Misgendering taboos make the people more sensitive, moving people away from pro-social integration & more sensitive to slights Recommendations: Learn the skills to rise above appearances.

Saved - January 16, 2024 at 5:23 AM

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Dr. Destroys gender ideology in 5 minutes. https://t.co/2FzeTmB9bl

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Grossman, a psychiatrist, responds to Dr. McNamara's testimony on gender-affirming care. She disagrees with the idea that sex is assigned at birth, stating that it is established at conception. Dr. Grossman argues that social and medical interventions for transgender individuals are not evidence-based and claims that countries like Finland, Sweden, and the UK have restricted such treatments without negative consequences. She suggests that psychotherapy is a more appropriate approach. Dr. Grossman also highlights the existence of a debate within the medical community, with prominent figures opposing medical interventions for transgender individuals due to a lack of long-term benefits and potential harm. She concludes by quoting a whistleblower who criticizes the experimental nature of gender clinics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for your testimony. The chair now recognizes doctor Grossman for 5 minutes for your opening statement. Thank you for the opportunity to address you. My name is Miriam Grossman. I'm a board certified child adolescent and adult psychiatrist, author, and senior fellow at Do No Harm. I have been taking care of patients for 45 years. I'm going to use my time to respond to doctor McNamara. First, I'm struck by her use of the phrase, sex assigned at birth. Sex is not assigned at birth. Sex is established at conception, and it's recognized at birth, if not earlier. Doctor McNamara claims that her views are science based, but to claim that sex is assigned at birth is without any scientific basis whatsoever. Its language misleads people, especially children, into thinking that male and female are Arbitrary designations and can change. That is simply not true. Doctor McNamara claims that social and medical interventions are the only evidence based treatment and that scientific evidence shows it is lifesaving. Without it, She's warning us kids will commit suicide. Well, a growing number of countries have effectively banned the care to which she's referring. And thank god, there's been no wave of suicides or other mental health catastrophes. 3 years ago, Finland placed strict limitations on medical interventions for minors. Sweden did the same thing after a 14 year old girl Was found to have osteoporosis and spinal fractures from puberty blockers. An investigation concluded, Quote, the risks of anti puberty, and hormone treatment for those under 18 Currently outweigh the possible benefits. The UK conducted a review and called the evidence very low. They've also placed severe restrictions on the care that doctor McNamara calls lifesaving. Norway Also analyzed the data and has made similar changes in policy. The National Academy of Medicine in France warned, Quote, great medical caution must be taken in children and adolescents given the vulnerability of this population and the many undesirable, even serious Complications the therapies cause. Doctors in New Zealand and Australia have published similar statements. Is doctor McNamara suggesting That all these countries are rejecting evidence based treatment and placing their kids at risk of suicide. Regarding that point of view, Finland's gender expert, doctor Rita Kaltiela, said, quote, It's purposeful disinformation, the spreading of which is irresponsible. All 7 countries and Florida too, of course, Concluded, the kids don't need their development interrupted. The girls don't need their periods stopped and their voices lowered. And the boys don't need to grow breasts. What they need is psychotherapy. I have other objections to doctor McNamara's testimony. She insists that her position, only hers, represents standard medical care. What she doesn't want you to know is that there is no standard. There's a debate. There's a fierce debate. And on the side opposite her stands such prominent figures as Stephen Levine, Kenneth Zucker, Paul McHugh, and James Kanter among others. These doctors are giants in the field. They have been treating transgender patients and gathering data and publishing papers about them, and I mean no disrespect here. But since before doctor McNamara was born, the point is That those veteran clinicians and others who have wisdom and experience are ignored because they disagree with the current narrative. They're against medical interventions for the same reason those 7 countries are. There is no evidence of long term benefit, but there is evidence of harm. I'll end by quoting Jamie Reid, the courageous whistleblower from the Children's Gender Clinic in Saint Louis. I believe that that hospital receives the medical education funding that we're discussing today. She said that doctors at that clinic said, we are building the plane while we are flying it. We are building the plane while we are flying it. That's how they described The treatment at their gender clinic. Our precious tax dollars should not support such a perilous experiment. Thank you.
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 3:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vivek Ramaswamy's statement calling transgenderism, especially in kids, a mental health disorder, sparked swift backlash. Many argue his views are out of touch with the medical community. Ramaswamy's stance on transgender issues positions him on the far right, potentially alienating moderate voters and complicating the Republican Party's unity.

@Patriots1Press - Patriots Press

Vivek Ramaswamy's Controversial Stance on Transgender Identity Vivek Ramaswamy made a bold and controversial statement, calling transgenderism, especially in kids, a mental health disorder. The backlash was swift and fierce, with many arguing that Ramaswamy's views are out of touch with the medical community. In the past, the diagnostic manuals of the World Health Organization and American Psychiatric Association contained language that considered transgenderism to be a disorder. But, in the last decade, these manuals have been updated to clarify that being transgender is not a mental illness. Ramaswamy's stance on transgender issues positions him on the far right of the political spectrum, potentially alienating moderate voters. Moreover, his views further complicate the Republican Party's efforts to present a unified front as they navigate a challenging political landscape. I agree with what Vivek says here in the video. Do you?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe transgenderism is a mental health condition, but I support open conversation. I met two young women who had regretted their decision to have surgeries as teenagers. I think adults should have the freedom to live as they choose, but we must protect children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Give me all our questions. Lgbtq. What's up? Lgbtq. Yep. What about it? What is your stance on LGBTQ? This is controversial for me to say, but I'm gonna tell you what I think. I believe that transgenderism specifically is a mental health disorder. I believe it's a mental health condition. Okay. We have to have open conversation in this country. But I don't think the compassionate thing to do disorder. Well That's how I fucking feel. They have so they feel. And you know what? I'll tell you a story. I met 2 young women in this race about 6 months ago. They're in their 20s now. Both of them had their breasts cut off. One of them had her uterus removed. Okay. They're in their twenties. They regret that decision. 1 of them wants to have kids. She'll never have kids. The other one will never breastfeed her Children. They'll never be the same because they had that done to them when they were teenagers. That is not compassion. That is cruelty. So my view is this. If you're An adult. You're free to live your life however you want as long as you're not hurting somebody else. If you're a man, you could dress how you want. If you're a woman, you could dress how you want. Identify How you want? We're a free country, and I'm not gonna stop you. But kids are not the same as adults, and we have to protect our children.
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 6:08 PM

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

A pediatrician explains gender in about 5 minutes. https://t.co/mcdTZU6c0M

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congratulations on the birth of a baby boy or girl. A pediatrician explains that biological sex is determined by DNA and is binary, with differences between men and women. Identity, however, is psychological and not biologically hardwired. The speaker argues against the idea of being born transgender and shares a story of a child who identified as a girl due to perceived family dynamics. The speaker criticizes the use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in treating gender-confused children, highlighting potential risks and long-term consequences. They also express concern about the indoctrination of transgender ideology in schools, calling it psychological abuse and child mutilation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congratulations. It's a boy. Or congratulations. It's a girl. As a pediatrician for nearly 20 years, that's how many of my patient relationships began. Her body is to clear our specs. Biological sex is not assigned. Sex is determined at inception by our DNA stamps into every cell of our bodies. Human sexuality is binary. Either you have a normal y chromosome and develop into a male or you don't and you will develop into a female, there are at least 65 100 genetic differences between men and women. Hormones and surgery cannot and do not change this. Look. An identity is not biological. It is psychological. Identity has to do with thinking and feeling. Thoughts and feelings are not biologically hardwired. Our thinking and feeling may be factually right or factually wrong. For example, if I walk into my doctor's office today and say, hi. I'm Margaret Thatcher. My physician will say I am delusional and give me an antipsychotic. However, if instead I walked in and said, I am a man, he would say, congratulations. You're transgender, if I were to say, doctor, I am suicidal. I'm an amputee trapped in a normal body. Please surgically remove my leg. I'll be diagnosed with body identity integrity disorder. But if I walk up to that same doctor and say, I'm a man. Sign me up for a double mastectomy, my physician will. See, according to most mainstream medical organizations, if you want to cut off a healthy arm or a healthy leg, you're mentally ill. But if you want to cut off healthy breasts or a penis, you're transgender. Let's be clear, no one is born transgender. If gender identity were hardwired in the brain before earth, identical twins would have the same gender identity 100% of the time. They don't. I had one little boy, a patient we'll call Andy. Between the ages of 35, he increasingly played with girls and stereotypical girl toys and started saying he was a girl. I referred the parents and Angie to a therapist, sometimes mental illness of a parent or abuse of a child are factors. But more commonly, the child has missed perceived family dynamics and internalized a false belief. In the middle of one session, Andy put down the toy truck and held on to the barbie and said, mommy and daddy, you don't love me when I'm a boy. What the therapist learned is that when Andy was 3, his sister with special needs was born. She required significantly more of his parents' care and attention. Andy misperceived this as mommy and daddy love girls, if I want them to love me again, I have to be a girl. With family therapy, Andy got better. Today, Andy's parents would be told something quite different. They would hear, this is who Andy really is. You must change his name, ensure that everyone treats him as a girl, our auntie will commit suicide. As Andy would approach puberty, the experts would put him on puberty blockers so that he could continue to impersonate a girl. Experts assure us it doesn't matter that we've never tested puberty blockers in biologically normal children. It doesn't matter that when blockers are used to treat prostate cancer in men and gynecologic problems in women, that they cause problems with memory, we don't need testing. No. We need to arrest his physical development at now, or he'll commit suicide. But this is not true. Instead, when supported in their biological sex through natural the vast majority of gender confused children get better, yet we are canonically castrating gender confused children with puberty blockers. Then we permanently sterilize many of them by adding cross sex hormones. Cross sex hormones are estrogen and testosterone. Those put young children at risk for heart disease, strokes, diabetes, cancers, and even the very emotional problems that experts claim to be preventing. PS, if a girl who insists she is a man has been on testosterone daily for 1 year, she's cleared to get a bilateral mastectomy at age 16. Now mind you, the American Academy of Pediatrics recently came out with a report that urges pediatricians to caution teenagers about getting tattoos because tattoos are essentially permanent and can cause scarring. But the same AAP is 110% in support of 16 year old girls getting a double mastectomy even without parental consent so long as the girl insists that she is a man and has been taking testosterone daily for 1 year. Let's be clear. To indoctrinate all children from preschool forward with the lie that they could be trapped in the wrong body disrupts the very foundation of a child's reality testing. If a child can't trust the reality of their physical bodies, who or what can they trust? Transgender ideology in schools is psychological abuse that often leads to chemical castration, sterilization, and surgical mutilation. If that's not child abuse, ladies and gentlemen, what is?
Saved - March 6, 2024 at 5:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Leaked discussions from key figures in WPATH reveal controversial views on gender medicine. Surgeon Dr. Marci Bowers claims puberty blockers are reversible, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. Endocrinologist Dr. Daniel Metzger acknowledges the difficulty of discussing fertility preservation with children and the common occurrence of reproductive regret. Psychologist Dr. Dianne Berg recognizes that children may not fully understand the implications of transition, raising concerns about informed consent. Activist Jamison Green highlights patients' fear of reading consent forms before surgeries. Surgeon Dr. Cecile Ferrando experiments with testosterone on young women for "wellbeing." Psychotherapist Dr. Ren Massey emphasizes the influence of various factors on gender identity. Plastic surgeon Dr. Scott Mosser disregards risks associated with operating on high BMI patients, violating medical ethics. Plastic surgeon Dr. Sidbh Gallagher faces backlash for complications in obese patients. Psychiatrist Dr. Dan Karasic denies the impact of mental illness on consent for cross-sex hormones. Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy's reframing of gender interventions as "embodiment" goals is criticized for shifting responsibility away from professionals. Dr. Thomas W Johnson's inclusion of "eunuch" as a gender identity in WPATH's SOC 8 raises concerns about its authority. Surgeon Dr. Thomas Satterwhite seeks advice on performing "non-standard" gender surgeries. Dr. Michael Irwig expresses concern about castrating psychologically troubled men, but supports labeling them as "eunuchs" before irreversible surgeries.

@genspect - Genspect

1/🔍📣 "The WPATH Files" have been released 📂: Leaked discussions from WPATH key figures. Find out what they really think about what’s happening in “gender medicine.”💡 https://t.co/zBSeJAEP2m

@genspect - Genspect

2/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Meet Dr Marci Bowers, a surgeon and the President of WPATH. Bowers has said that puberty blockers are “fully reversible.” But evidence suggests otherwise and Bowers knows this. 💥#WPATHFiles https://t.co/6GhJwiFJ34

@genspect - Genspect

3/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Daniel Metzger, an endocrinologist, knows that talking to kids about fertility preservation is difficult because they don’t fully understand what they are giving up. Dr Metzger also knows that reproductive regret is common. 🤯 #WPATHFiles https://t.co/opvhYUWJWF

@genspect - Genspect

4/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Dianne Berg, a psychologist, knows that kids cannot developmentally understand the implications of transition and acknowledges that parents are signing off on things they don’t understand. This is NOT informed consent. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/nOht57JNCM

@genspect - Genspect

5/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Jamison Green, an activist and former WPATH President, knows that patients are often signing consent forms without reading because they are afraid to read the details of the surgeries and procedures they are about to undergo. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/El64OotV4U

@genspect - Genspect

6/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Cecile Ferrando, a surgeon, experiments with giving young women small doses of testosterone to, for example, stop their periods. Dr Ferrando says that her experiments help improve young women’s wellbeing. Sure, “wellbeing.”🙄 https://t.co/EydwJys8VQ

@genspect - Genspect

7/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Ren Massey, a psychotherapist, knows that multiple things could be affecting a person’s sense of their gender identity and, in particular, he knows that exploring one’s sexuality can help clarify gender issues. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/7DTxnREGYq

@genspect - Genspect

8/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Scott Mosser, a plastic surgeon and WPATH member, disregards the risks associated with operating on patients whose BMI is too high, thereby putting patients at increased risk. Mosser shows blatant disregard for medical ethics! #WPATHFiles https://t.co/m2CG6K6L7o

@genspect - Genspect

9/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Sidbh Gallagher, a plastic surgeon who advertises gender surgeries to teens on TikTok, has received backlash from obese patients who say they experienced severe post-op complications. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/wqGoCnD4Wp

@genspect - Genspect

10/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Dan Karasic, a psychiatrist, refuses to acknowledge that mental illness can impact someone’s capacity to consent to treatments like cross-sex hormones. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/JjwTodONlZ

@genspect - Genspect

11/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Johanna Olson-Kennedy pushes for a risky shift, reframing of gender interventions as being about “embodiment” goals, not treatment for dysphoria. This is dangerous; it takes away responsibility from professionals causing harm. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/Rp7U1pOx8E

@genspect - Genspect

12/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Thomas W Johnson wrote a chapter in WPATH’s SOC 8 which presents “eunuch” as a gender identity. 🤯 This alone should make organizations who refer to WPATH’s SOC 8 as authoritative think twice. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/3Fa083iZUz

@genspect - Genspect

13/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Thomas Satterwhite, a surgeon, has actively sought advice on how to get more surgeons to perform “non-standard” gender surgeries—these include nullification surgery, ph*llus-preserving neo-v*ginas, minimum-depth neo-v*ginas. #WPATHFiles https://t.co/U2VKu1Z9Ro

@genspect - Genspect

14/ WHO’S WHO IN THE WPATH FILES 🔍: Dr Michael Irwig is worried that surgeons will lose their license if they c*strate psychologically troubled men, so he’s delighted that surgeons can now assign the label “eunuch” to said men before performing irreversible surgeries. #WPATHFiles

Saved - March 20, 2024 at 1:45 AM

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

This video exposes the madness and lies of trans health professionals. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who runs the biggest gender clinic in the world at the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, says an 18-month-old toddler knew they were transgender. https://t.co/GdUf0HpA8e

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the increasing number of transgender youth seeking medical care and undergoing treatments like puberty blockers and surgeries. It highlights the challenges and risks involved in these procedures, including postoperative depression and complications. The story follows Jazz, a transgender youth, and her journey through surgeries and the support of her family. The debate around the effectiveness and safety of these treatments is also touched upon, with differing opinions on the outcomes and long-term effects. Overall, the video sheds light on the complex and emotional process of transitioning for transgender individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The number of transgender people probably hasn't changed, but young people are finding that it's safer to be who they are. Speaker 1: The youngest that I've ever heard somebody express their gender identity being different than their assigned gender is 18 months old. Speaker 2: From the age of about 2, they they're brought in and and then some are encouraged to do a social transition. Speaker 3: At just 11 years old, she is the brave and beautiful new face of a child born in the wrong body. Speaker 2: The boy wants to play with dolls. Given, the media, instead of just saying, wow, okay, you're just playing around or it's not a big deal or maybe you're gay, they rushed them to the gender clinics. Speaker 1: We have the largest trans youth clinic in the world. Speaker 0: They are expressing their identities more openly and presenting for medical care. Speaker 4: Puberty blockers at age 12, however, where you're given a chance to get that time that you need to see if it is a real phenomenon, yes, that makes a lot of sense. Speaker 5: She's one of the first to have undergone complete tubular suppression. Speaker 1: Being able to block that process with these medications is extremely beneficial. Speaker 6: There are differences associated with puberty blockers, including less bone density. One study showed reduced spatial memory. Speaker 7: I got my first blocker and testosterone shots at 13 years old. Speaker 6: This does not alleviate symptoms of gender dysphoria. It does not improve psychological functioning in these children. Speaker 7: The high suicide rates amongst, like, trans identified adolescents, and they basically said, would you rather have a dead daughter or a live son? Speaker 8: Had you expressed any suicidal ideation to any of anyone? Speaker 7: No. And it was at 15 that I went under the knife to get my mastectomy. Speaker 2: The boys can have their genital surgeries from about 16, and there's some hint that it might even be 15. Speaker 4: Hello. Knock, knock. Hello. Hello. Speaker 2: Who made themselves be transgender or are transgender. Speaker 4: Jazz has had a very difficult surgical course. She had a very incredible first surgery. It went seemingly very well, but there were problems. Speaker 5: Why are you cutting there? Right here? Speaker 4: Yeah. Why? Because it does it scar, Jess. I don't like it. Speaker 5: Yeah. But there's scar everywhere. If you don't have to cut this, why would you cut this? Speaker 4: This is what the WPATH Standards of Care are all about. They're consensus and science based guidelines. It turned out tougher than any of us imagined. Speaker 5: Lack of growth of the skin and other tissues, which we rely on as surgeons to do this operation. And we don't have the experience of having said we've done 50 of these. Speaker 9: I have a 100% of people who've had genital surgery have had postoperative depression. Speaker 7: I told my mom, I kinda just broke down crying to her one night about how this was the biggest mistake in my life. Life. Speaker 9: Something that I always talk about and say, look, this is a big surgery. Speaker 4: We're seeing, certainly very high levels of satisfaction. Speaker 7: I mean, my breasts are gone permanently. I have no idea about, like, the whether I'll be able to have kids. Speaker 6: It's pretty disconcerting in certain ways. It's like, woah. You know, this is what occurs while Jazz is having her surgery, and the doctors sometimes don't see eye to eye. Speaker 5: We can just advance it to there. Jess, let me go. But it doesn't make any sense. Why do you need to cut that? Speaker 4: Because this is a disfiguring scar. Speaker 5: How do you know it's not a disfiguring scar? That's just the sulcus. These are the 2 labia. I mean, you may be right, but we don't know. Just Why don't we just open this up and then see what this is for? Speaker 4: Gets input from around the world, with available science that that, provides input and consensus. Speaker 5: Let me go. Speaker 8: I will say that I feel like Speaker 10: things should happen in a more methodical way. Speaker 5: This needs to advance more because we're off center. Speaker 4: This has to come down here. Speaker 5: I mean, this is off center. See, this is tilted. So that In order to get this midline, we need to bring that down more, And that will centralize this. Speaker 4: It is safe. It is effective, and it's based on science. Speaker 6: So last time, the major complication was dehiscence. The Right. Stitches started coming apart. How likely do you think that's gonna happen again? Speaker 4: It's it's always possible. I have optimism that it won't need another surgery. Speaker 10: There have been many cases where it hasn't gone well. Speaker 4: Improved self esteem, reduced suicidality. Speaker 10: 18 times more than the general population committed suicide. Speaker 3: No one knows why thousands of children like Jazz are transgender. Speaker 2: It's not based on any scientific evidence, not research. Speaker 3: There are only theories. Speaker 2: Everybody is expected to go along with it. And because nobody wants to be a bigot, they want to get to get the boys while they're still in school because they'll probably still be living at home. The parents can help with the extensive aftercare that takes months and it's extremely intensive and lots lots can go wrong. Speaker 4: I'm happy. I I have a good sense of what we need to do. Speaker 3: Jazz is fortunate. Her parents and 3 siblings accept her. And as much as they can, keep her safe. Speaker 6: I might never experience an orgasm.
Saved - June 8, 2024 at 1:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The American College of Pediatricians is urging major medical associations to stop promoting gender transition treatments for children and adolescents. They recommend comprehensive evaluations and therapies instead. The college provides numerous studies to support their stance. Additionally, a film called "The War On Children" exposes the alleged indoctrination and sexualization of children by far-left activists. The film can be watched on various platforms, including @X and the Movies Plus and Rumble apps. The filmmaker expresses gratitude to @elonmusk for providing a platform for meaningful debates.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

The American College of Pediatricians just put out a 🔥🔥🔥 statement calling out all the major medical associations by name for pushing the gender transition craze on kids. They ask for these groups to "IMMEDIATELY stop the promotion of social affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries for children and adolescents who experience distress over their biological sex." The full @ACPeds statement ⬇️ "Therefore, given the recent research and the revelations of the harmful approach advocated by WPATH and its followers in the United States, we, the undersigned, call upon the medical professional organizations of the United States, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the  Endocrine Society, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry to follow the science and their European professional colleagues and immediately stop the promotion of social affirmation, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries for children and adolescents who experience distress over their biological sex.  Instead, these organizations should recommend comprehensive evaluations and therapies aimed at identifying and addressing underlying psychological co-morbidities and neurodiversity that often predispose to and accompany gender dysphoria. We also encourage the physicians who are members of these professional organizations to contact their leadership and urge them to adhere to the evidence-based research now available.” They link to MANY studies on their site: https://doctorsprotectingchildren.org

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are concerned about harmful protocols for children struggling with their biological sex. We urge US medical organizations to stop promoting social affirmation, puberty blockers, hormones, and surgeries for these children. Sex is biologically determined and should guide medical decisions. We reject the claim that our concerns are a minority opinion and demand a change in approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we have serious concerns about the physical and mental health effects of the current protocols promoted for the care of children and adolescents in the United States who express discomfort with their biological sex. This declaration was authored by the American College of Pediatricians but really it was developed from the expertise of hundreds of doctors, researchers, and other health care workers and leaders who for years have been sounding the alarm on the harmful protocols that continue to be promoted by the medical organizations in the United States. Despite recent revelations from the leaked WPATH files and the recent release of the final report from the cast review, these medical organizations have not changed course. So we are calling on these medical organizations of the United States including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Endocrine Society, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry to follow the science and their European colleagues And immediately stop the promotion of social affirmation, puberty blockers, cross sex hormones and surgeries for children and adolescents who experience distress over their biological sex. In our declaration, we affirm that sex is a dimorphic innate trait defined in relation to an organism's biological role in reproduction, male and female. This genetic signature is present in every nucleated somatic cell in the body and is not altered by drugs or surgical interventions. Consideration of these innate differences is critical to the practice of good medicine and to the development of sound policy for children and adults alike. Medical decision making should be based upon an individual's biological sex. It should respect biological reality and the dignity of the person by compassionately addressing the whole person. We are here to find the claims made by these medical organizations in the US that those of us who are concerned are a minority and that their protocols are consensus. They are not consensus, and we are speaking in a loud unified voice enough.
Doctors Protecting Children Doctors Protecting Children Declaration SIGN THE DECLARATION "Therefore, given the recent research and the revelations of the harmful approach advocated by WPATH and its followers in the United States, we, the undersigned, call upon the medical professional organizations doctorsprotectingchildren.org

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

If you still don’t know much about this issue or don’t understand how damaging this ideology is, go watch The War On Children. Our film explains it all and is now over 50M views worldwide. Watch the film: http://TheWarOnChildren.com

The War on Children – Documentary thewaronchildren.com

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Today we make history on @X by premiering our film "The War On Children" here. Watch the trailer and then help us prove filmmakers don’t need woke studios to succeed by subscribing to watch the full film. What’s the film about? There’s a war on our children right now. Far left activists will stop at nothing to indoctrinate them, sexualize them, guilt them and punish them until they submit to their woke religion. For too long the dots haven’t been connected to expose their battle plan. This film exposes EVERYTHING. The War On Children is the ultimate @X film. Many of the people and stories featured were found right here on 𝕏. Many risked losing their accounts (and more) to expose this war on our children but now @elonmusk owns the site and even he’s subscribed to me and has access to our film. Jump in with us and let’s make history. If you don’t know how to subscribe, here’s how: Scroll down to the next tweet that has a link you can click to subscribe OR go back to my main page on here @robbystarbuck, make sure you already follow me and then you’ll have the option to click SUBSCRIBE for $5. That gets you access to our film! What if you want a higher quality TV or home theatre experience? You can download the Movies Plus app on nearly every TV, App Store and even XBOX. Then search The War On Children to rent the film there. Alternatively, you can download the Rumble app as well where the film is also available to rent for $11.99. And thanks again @ElonMusk for making @X a place where the truth lives and people can have meaningful debates again. Without your actions, this film would not be premiering here today. A big thanks to all who participated @libsoftiktok @randpaul @Riley_Gaines_ @REVWUTRUTH @sgruber91 @CourageHabit @iamlisalogan @RealJessTapia @LJDetrans @karaafrederick @Harrisontinz @KelleyAshbyPaul @bac37 @KeelinWA @justindanhof @WilliamLamberth For anyone who wants to do more to support our work, you can contribute any amount at http://www.TheWarOnChildren.com so that we can make other amazing films and provide adult only screenings to churches. Thank you in advance for subscribing! WARNING: This film is not suitable for children

Video Transcript AI Summary
Big Tech is accused of sexualizing and exploiting children on social media. Concerns about children being exposed to inappropriate content and transitioning without parental consent are raised. The entertainment industry is criticized for targeting kids. Lobbying by adult magazines like Penthouse in schools is mentioned. The interviewees stress the need to protect children and speak out against these issues. They believe it's a war on children and urge more people to take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are they intentionally sexualizing our children and stealing their innocence? I think that's right. Speaker 1: TikTok specifically is designed to target young people. That's who their audience is. Speaker 0: Have children died because of social media? Speaker 2: Absolutely. Speaker 0: Have they been trafficked off of social media? Speaker 2: A 100%. Speaker 0: Have they been sexually exploited off of social media? Speaker 2: Ongoing. Yes. I'm scrolling on TikTok. I see little kids with TikTok. What are they looking at? Speaker 3: This is what you don't want kids to see. Is that correct? Exactly. Speaker 0: And again, this is depicting children. Speaker 3: This is this is supposed to be kids. Speaker 1: Well, honestly, I didn't even know that transition, from female to male was an option until I, was on social media and began being exposed to those type of communities. Speaker 2: You've never seen a 18 month old masturbating? No. I haven't. Have you seen any sexually explicit drag shows marketed as all ages for kids that you would denounce or think that are a problem and that you wanna distance yourself from. Speaker 3: No. You know this is wrong. Speaker 1: So I'm sorry. I'm gonna have to end the interview. Speaker 3: They use the word sexualized kids at a young age or, you know, I mean, give me a break. Speaker 2: It just seems like there's no moral, you know, construct at all. Speaker 3: Are kids facing just the absolute worst onslaught of roaming that we've ever seen? Speaker 1: Yes. The entertainment industry is sexualizing children for an agenda. Speaker 0: Your daughter was secretly transitioned at school. Speaker 1: This policy has to do with children as young as 5 all the way through high school. Speaker 4: Penthouse footed the bill to lobby before state boards of education. Yes. Penthouse and playboy. The history behind this is far darker than most Americans understand. Speaker 0: You think the big tech companies at this point are essentially aiding and abetting human traffickers and people who are working to exploit children? Absolutely. Speaker 3: If you don't wanna hear it in a school board meeting, why should children be able to check it out of the school system? Speaker 5: There is misinformation presented that somehow that we're doing surgery on minors or even children, and that simply is not true. Speaker 0: How old were you when they gave you a double and stuck with me? Speaker 1: It was a month after my 13th birthday. Speaker 3: Ultimately, we're gonna talk about, are they gonna give the counselors gonna give them medication there at school without their parents' permission? I mean, I think we're leading towards an absurd and horrific time. Speaker 1: First of all, we weren't forewarned we would be sharing a locker room. We had no idea. I turned around, Speaker 2: a 6 foot 4, 22 year old man fully intact with an exposing male genitalia. His ideology is killing our kid. Speaker 0: Do you think more people need to speak up to protect kids like your daughter? Speaker 2: Yes. I do. Well, I think from heaven, she can see how hard you fought for her. Speaker 0: Do you feel like this is a war on children? Speaker 2: I know it's a war on children, but like they said, we're coming for your kids. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 2: And they have. Speaker 1: Can I ask the cameras to get turned off for just a second? I just wanna have a real conversation.
The War on Children – Documentary thewaronchildren.com
Saved - June 21, 2024 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jordan Peterson criticizes the C40 Consortium agenda, claiming it includes extreme measures such as limiting citizens to only three articles of clothing per year, reducing private car ownership by 95%, and allowing only one short-haul flight every three years. He argues that these goals would devastate industries and negatively impact Western living standards. Peterson suggests that the agenda is being used by bureaucrats and radical leftists, who are willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor for their own ambitions.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Insane... Jordan Peterson about C40 Consortium agenda: "This is a consortium of some of the 40 largest cities on the globe, all allied together at the level local municipal government who are literally pursuing an agenda that includes no more than 3 articles of clothing per citizen per year. A 95% (reduction) in private car ownership which is why we're all being encouraged to produce the electric cars that we won't have enough electricity to run anyways because you don't need electricity if you actually don't get to own a car. And if the goal is 95% reduction in private automobile ownership then it doesn't matter if there's no damn grid. 1 short haul flight per person every 3 years which will completely obviously decimate the entire travel industry plus all of the tourism industry that Europe depends on absolutely in all possible manners. And then overall although this isn't directly from the c-40, the fundamental goal of something approximating an 85% reduction in Western living standards which is the calculation of the green virtuous globalist utopians, as to what's necessary in order for us to inhabit a green planet. And so all of this means not only are the bureaucrats who are using this get out of jail free card to advance their careers and the conspiratorialists who are radically left using it explicitly as an agenda. It also means that the bloody radical leftists are 100% willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to their ambition and their green agenda." Source: Jordan B. Peterson (YouTube)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The C40 consortium, made up of 40 major cities, aims for citizens to only have 3 articles of clothing, 95% reduction in private car ownership, and limited flights. This could greatly impact industries and living standards. Some believe this green agenda may sacrifice the working class and poor for environmental goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then just so that we don't assume that I'm only thinking about quasi conspiracies, You know, I've looked very carefully at the so called C 40 consortium agenda, and this is a consortium of the 40 some of the 40 largest cities in in in in on the globe, all allied together at the level of local municipal government who are literally pursuing an agenda that includes no more than 3 articles of clothing per citizen per year, a 95%, 95% in private car ownership, which is why we're all being, encouraged to produce the electric cars that we won't have enough to run anyways because you don't need electricity if you actually don't get to own a car. And if the goal is a 95% reduction in private automobile ownership, then it doesn't matter if there's no damn grid. One short haul flight per person every 3 years, which will completely obviously decimate the entire travel industry, plus all of the tourism industry that Europe depends on absolutely in all possible manners. And then overall, although this isn't directly from the c forty, the, the fundamental goal of something approximating an 85% reduction in western living standards, which is the calculation of the green virtuous globalist utopians as to what's necessary in order for us to inhabit a green planet. And so all of this means it's to me, it means not only are the bureaucrats who are using this get out of jail free card to advance their careers and the conspiratorialists who are radically left using it explicitly as an agenda. It also means that the bloody radical leftists are 100% willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to their ambition and their green agenda.
Saved - September 16, 2024 at 11:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been sharing a series of resources regarding Jon K. Uhler, including articles, podcasts, and recordings that delve into ongoing investigations. Notable pieces include interviews with Nicole Uhler and insights from other individuals connected to Jon. I've highlighted concerning statements and behaviors attributed to him, as well as evidence related to his past forgery charges. Additionally, I've discussed Jon's family dynamics and the implications of his actions on his daughter. The information aims to shed light on the complexities surrounding his professional and personal life.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

Thread: Links to articles, podcasts, Twitter/X space recordings, etc., related to recent investigations into Jon K. Uhler. 1. Article: South Carolina Is Investigating Jon Uhler And So Are We, Part One in a series by @DistMag https://www.thedistancemag.com/p/south-carolina-is-investigating-jon?r=uglk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

South Carolina Is Investigating Jon Uhler And So Are We Part One in a series thedistancemag.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

2. Podcast: The Red Flags Around Jon Uhler: Part 1. An extended interview with Nicole Uhler by @DistMag https://www.thedistancemag.com/p/the-red-flags-around-jon-uhler-part?r=uglk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Red Flags Around Jon Uhler: Part 1 An extended interview with Nicole Uhler thedistancemag.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag 3. Twitter/X space recording: New Uhler Files dropping

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag 4. Podcast: The Red Flags Around Jon Uhler: Part 2. An extended interview with Nicole Uhler by @DistMag https://www.thedistancemag.com/p/the-red-flags-around-jon-uhler-part-cac?r=uglk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Red Flags Around Jon Uhler: Part 2 An extended interview with Nicole Uhler thedistancemag.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag 5. Twitter/X space recording: Uhlergate: Nicole Uhler Speaks Out

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag 6. Statements by Nicole Uhler via @OsborneInk

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 7. Statements by Nicole Uhler via @OsborneInk

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 8. Statement by Nicole Uhler via @OsborneInk

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 9. Statement by Nicole Uhler via @OsborneInk

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 10. Article: How Jon Uhler Put His Family Behind Him, Part 2 of our investigation into the 'safeguarding expert' by @DistMag https://www.thedistancemag.com/p/how-jon-uhler-put-his-family-behind?r=uglk&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

How Jon Uhler Put His Family Behind Him Part 2 of our investigation into the 'safeguarding expert' thedistancemag.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 11. Podcast: The Red Flags Around Jon Uhler: Part 3. An interview with his former business partner by @DistMag https://www.thedistancemag.com/p/the-red-flags-around-jon-uhler-part-2cd

The Red Flags Around Jon Uhler - Part 3 An interview with his former business partner thedistancemag.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 12. Twitter/X space recording: Jimmy Hinton speaks out on Jon Uhler

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 13. Complementary clip from an interview Jon Uhler did with @BenjaminABoyce back in December 2022.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that "mission accomplished" is achieved when they have full sway over someone. This is demonstrated when that person defends Speaker 0 to others, even when those others express concerns or skepticism. The speaker illustrates this with an example: if someone questions Speaker 0's trustworthiness, the person under their sway will defend them, saying "You can trust him."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I know when it's mission accomplished when I have full sway over you. Yeah. When I hear you tell somebody else that same phrase about me because they're not under the sway of me. And so someone will come along that cares about you and say, Benjamin, you know that Euler guy. I don't know. He he just seems sketchy. Why are you going into business with him? I know I have you when you will come to my defense and say, well, I know what it looks like, but it's really not that. You can trust him.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 14. A thread containing the kind of “charts” Jon used in the “therapy” he provided to prison inmates. This stuff was not part of the prison curriculum he was meant to be following.

@DistMag - The Distance Mag

We received these from a new source last night. They are compelling evidence that what Nevin Hersch said about Jon "confusing" his counselees is true

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 15. This blog post from 2017 relates to the incident that prompted Jimmy Hinton to part ways with Jon and resign from Church Protect. https://ilovetogoagardening.com/2017/09/29/voices-of-the-victims/

Voices of the Victims I am such a horrible, terrible person! I am bowing my head in absolute shame. Yesterday afternoon I went out to the coop to gather eggs. The ducks met me, quacking loudly in complaint. That's when I noticed that I had forgotten to feed them that morning. Horrified, I filled their food dish and they… ilovetogoagardening.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 16. Clip: Jon offers “regular consulting” sessions where he “won’t be working with you using my therapy license” (i.e., off-the-books counseling that circumvents regulatory requirements). The article linked at the top of this thread makes reference to this same video footage.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To donate or schedule a session, click the picture, which leads to a quote and then to PayPal for video calls. The speaker's terms and conditions specify that they will not be working under their therapy license to avoid diagnosing clients. This allows them to work with people outside of Pennsylvania and South Carolina as a personal consultant. This means clients get the speaker's full range of skills without a treatment plan, diagnosis, or case notes. This arrangement also ensures that legal issues are avoided, as the relationship is not the same as a therapeutic one, and any notes taken would not be beneficial in court. The speaker relies on their memory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If anybody wants to donate or, yeah, if you want to donate, or if you want to schedule a session, by the way, you click here on this picture. As a matter of fact, I'll show you what happens. Right? So this will bring you to that's an actual quote. And then that'll, say if you want to do a video call, and then what you'll do is you do PayPal. But by the way, I do have terms and conditions. What are those terms and conditions? Essentially this, I won't be working with you at using my therapy license. The reason why is I don't have to diagnose you. Okay. And that means I can work with people outside of Pennsylvania and South Carolina. So, when I work with folks, I work with them as a personal consultant. But what does that mean? It means you get all of me, all my skills and abilities, but I'm not having to do a treatment plan. I'm not having to diagnose you. I don't have to take case notes. And you don't have to worry about if anything were to ever go to court, right? Because it's not the same kind of relationship. And the notes they would get, they would never derive any benefit. And the majority of time, I have a very good memory. Okay? So if you ever want to, reach out to me and do a consult or regular consulting, that's how you do that, by the way.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 17a. Clip: Jon asserts that the reason gender-confused females want their breasts removed is that they have a male alter (see Multiple Personality Disorder) who doesn’t identify with these body parts. He also asserts that this male alter arises from sexual abuse, as a protector.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Self-injury involves cutting through previous scars, which stems from sexual abuse. It's a redirection where the greater pain wins. Serious self-cutters enter a dissociative state and don't feel the pain because an alter takes it. Within that person, male and female parts exist. For a female, male parts emerge as protective ones. A protective part might not identify with the body, questioning its female characteristics. This part might then seek medical consultation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what my contention is this, that she's cut through previous scars from self injury. Well, what's that all about? Inevitably, it's it's, self injury comes from sexual abuse. It's rechanneling as if not channeling like new age. It's redirect the greater pain wins out. So if you've ever seen serious self injurious behavior, by the way, you know, where it takes stitches and that kind of stuff, when somebody does that, they don't feel it. That serious cutting. K? They're in a dissociative state. But how can they not feel it? Because an alter, another part of them is taking the pain. And within inevitably, within that degree of pain within that person, you're going to have parts that are both gender You'll have male and female parts. Why? Because the For a female, you'll have male parts. Why? Those are the protective ones. So can you imagine a protective part comes out, looks at the body, and says, What? What the heck are these? These don't belong here. I I don't identify with this. I'm not a girl. I'm a so I'm gonna go and I'm gonna talk to a doctor.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 17b. The article linked at the top of this thread makes reference to this same video footage.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 18. Article: Seven Red Flags That Detransitioners Cannot Unsee In Jon Uhler, by @DistMag https://www.thedistancemag.com/p/seven-red-flags-that-detransitioners?utm_campaign=post

Seven Red Flags That Detransitioners Cannot Unsee In Jon Uhler And everyone should examine for themselves thedistancemag.com

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 19. Clip: Jon promotes his “Survivor Support” website —the same website that he uses to procure bookings for the off-the-books counseling services he offers— as a resource for survivors who are “not quite sure whether or not they were abused”. https://t.co/ZbYiHpnY5Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
Individuals may seek information between therapy sessions or if unsure about past abuse. They might be trying to understand their experiences and recognize potential indicators.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Between their own sessions. Or if they're not quite sure whether or not they were abused, they're they're trying to figure out. They may see the indicators.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 20a. The video footage referenced at the start of the article “Seven Red Flags That Detransitioners Cannot Unsee In Jon Uhler” (Continued in 20b.) https://t.co/W6ljKvxG0s

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 20b. The video footage referenced at the start of the article “Seven Red Flags That Detransitioners Cannot Unsee In Jon Uhler” (Continued from 20a.) https://t.co/6mgQQFbjc4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a summary of the provided transcript: The speaker emphasizes that one doesn't need to trust them to utilize the information provided about the signs of sexual abuse. The speaker asserts that knowing these indicators is crucial for helping troubled children, regardless of the source. The key is whether one can recognize the signs or if personal biases prevent them from seeing the truth, hindering a child's disclosure and perpetuating the abuse. The speaker encourages listeners to verify the information independently, even though the speaker has experience working with sexual abuse victims. The speaker presents the information as a means to save time while urging individuals to assess the indicators and determine their validity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The good news is you don't have to trust or distrust me. The question is, what are you gonna do with this content? So if you care about troubled kids, you'd better know the warning signs. Well, but I don't trust you. I'm not asking you to trust me. I've been working with people and kids for 30 years. I'm just telling you, here are the signs of sexual abuse. So the good news is this, I don't necessarily need to trust or not trust the character of the person that's writing a fact based book. So what I'm letting people know is these are the indicators of sexual abuse. If you don't wanna trust me, then you figure out what the indicators are. And the question is, are you able to spot them? Or are you so agenda driven that it doesn't matter how many indicators are right in front of your face, and therefore, you'll never ask the right questions, and the kid will never disclose, and so the kid is gonna continue to be perked on. Which is more important to you? So that's my message that take what I have, and this should be true for Anyways. Take the information I'm presenting, assess it, and see if it is not so. Yeah. Look it up for yourself. Right? Right. You know? Own homework. Freaking you. I'm saving you a little bit of time. Yeah. But these are the indicators. Right? How can I say it? Because I've worked with sexual abuse victims for years. Okay. So hopefully that helps.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 21. Jon demonstrates what kind of a father he really is by likening his daughter —who HE has described as “emotionally troubled”— to Absalom. Reminder: Jon’s academic qualification is in FAMILY COUNSELING. https://t.co/MLTB5XqINA

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 22. Jon insinuates that the reason Christian Post journalist, Brandon Showalter, “slandered”* him is that Brandon is a furry**. * Factually correct statements aren’t slander, Jon, no matter how bad those statements make you look. ** There is no evidence that Brandon is a furry. https://t.co/9b8c9mrmMl

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 23. A thread containing a new piece of evidence that Jon has been lying about his forgery charges being dismissed.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

Thread: Evidence that Jon Uhler has been lying about his forgery charges. 1. According to the May 2016 Daily American news article: - Uhler was interviewed by the authorities on Feb. 17, and he admitted to forging signatures. - The preliminary hearing was scheduled for July 7. https://t.co/5XYLwAJ83p

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 24. Conclusive evidence that Jon Uhler’s forgery charges resulted in a conviction (probation only applies to charges that result in a conviction). https://t.co/4qC6eZF4yh

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 25a. Yet more conclusive evidence that Jon Uhler’s forgery charges resulted in a conviction and that he had the record of his conviction expunged. This email is basically Jon complaining about being asked to pay child support. Note all the emotional manipulation he employs. https://t.co/FeHzHGd2P9

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 25b. Side note: In post 24, I elected to redact most of the information because it was personal and irrelevant. I have elected not to redact the email in post 25a, because it demonstrates Jon’s emotional manipulation and it supports Nicole’s testimony (which is disputed by Jon).

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 26a. Yet even more conclusive evidence that Jon Uhler’s forgery charges resulted in a conviction. Here, he even explicitly states that he’s unable to pass a background check until his probation is complete. https://t.co/Phn92ciJnR

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 26b. Here’s what Jon says about how his passing of background checks —something which is only possible because he had the record of his conviction expunged— is proof that there’s “no skeletons in his closet”. He even goes on to hinge his trustworthiness on this. https://t.co/H8Ts4JHHKp

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 27. A thread containing some brief info about how Jon has deceptively misled people to believe he’s been happily married to his “high school sweetheart”, Susan, for decades.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

Oh look, @uhler_jon, it’s Tricia! The ex-wife you’ve been hiding! You know, the one you divorced* after 28 years and who unalived herself, while you got back together with your “high school sweetheart” and pretended that you’ve been happily married to her for decades? 1/ https://t.co/Yz04bn6A9h

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 28a.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

Using one of his “charts”, Jon Uhler signals to his daughter, Nicole, that she’s targeted for destruction by God. Once again, Jon’s observable behavior confirms the accuracy of Nicole’s testimony. https://t.co/xlQ6mmEcRn

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 28b. Back in June, a few days after learning that Nicole had shared her testimony with @OsborneInk, Jon uploaded a video titled “Encouragement for Dads on Father's Day” to YouTube. In this video, Jon similarly signals to Nicole that she’s going to be punished by God. https://t.co/k1YAnjiN1h

Video Transcript AI Summary
God's wrath is mentioned, and the child should be turned over and not be in your life because they will do malicious things. They despise authority and are malevolent, twisted, wicked, and becoming vile. They are the deceiver and the slanderer, which is the point of no return. When a child slanders their dad, that is soul murder, and they are going after dad's reputation, which is harmful, like what happened with Absalom. Once a child targets you, you have to let them go.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at the top words, His wrath has mentioned that's God. And at this point, we need to turn the child over. And do not allow, not have this child in your life. Why? Because they're going to do things that are malicious. Because straight down, despise authority, there they are, malevolent. They're not only twisted and they're wicked, but they're becoming vile. They're the deceiver and the slander, and that is the point of no return. Once a child begins to slander dad, that soul murder, he or she is is going after dad's reputation, and I call that the harmful. That is what happened with Absalom. And once a child gives evidence that they are targeting you, you have to let them go.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 28c. Despite Jon’s claim, he is NOT being slandered by Nicole. It’s not slander if it’s true. In this video, Nicole details the evidence.

@NikkiBaile238 - NikkiBailey

Thank you, Claire, for raising several, compelling questions which beg to be thoroughly addressed, re: Determining the difference between genuine safeguarders/abusers who pose as such; Is there a process by which we can determine victim vs. offender; & are there tell-tale signals which can shed light on forensic evidence?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses questions about their testimony regarding John, particularly concerning victimhood and police reports. They explain they testified only when asked by John's former associates. The speaker agrees their testimony alone isn't enough to convict John, but claims there's corroborating evidence from siblings, an ex-spouse, detransitioners, and online articles detailing past incidents. The speaker alleges John hasn't credibly refuted the evidence, instead resorting to personal attacks and generalizations. They claim many people, some anonymously due to fear, have similar experiences with John. The speaker highlights email evidence where John seemingly incriminates himself. They accuse John of lying about his credentials, including his work with sex offenders, and concealing his divorce and criminal charges. The speaker argues police reports aren't the sole determinant of a legitimate case, as abusers may file preemptive reports or victims may be unable or unwilling to file due to fear, lack of support, or the statute of limitations. They criticize John's behavior as mirroring abusive safeguarders seeking to exploit vulnerable individuals. The speaker believes John is being exposed because he preaches a false gospel and is spiritually abusive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, Claire. I appreciate you posting. I'm gonna create a video response because I knew that people were going to want to hear my thoughts about some of these issues that you raised about whether my testimony and if there's victimhood, if it's legitimate or not. Before I came out, before I was asked by John's former business partner, Jimmy Hinton, and then Matt Osborne, if I was comfortable with giving my testimony, I didn't come forward and say that I wanted to go ahead and testify or off off of the official court record testimony. I went ahead and just responded when I was asked. And because I know that so many people will have those same questions, I thought it was worth giving a video response, which, of course, takes a bit of time. I wanted to gather my thoughts before I responded. But, you know, I think it's you've raised some really good questions that I'm comfortable with responding to, and I wanted to make sure that it doesn't seem like I'm hiding because I'm very comfortable and I appreciate, by the way, that you, mentioned your thoughts. I thought that, I appreciate your honesty and, I hear what you're saying at the end where you said, I'm looking at the screen, by the way. You said you wanna be more productive than shouting or going back and forth, and I really appreciate that. And I share the same sentiments. So what I'm gonna do is read through on my screen what you wrote. I may screenshot it and put it beside the video so people can read along if they want to, and then I wanna respond and then give my own thoughts. It's gonna be a bit lengthy because I've thought about my responses in case people ask questions for a while now. And so I have more thoughts that might not address exactly what you said, but it's gonna go off. And I think it's I hope it's gonna be very informative and helpful. I especially wanna address the misconception about what does legitimate how can we tell when someone's actually a victim? And are there signs that we can rely on that someone would be an abuser? Can we, within a certain margin, determine definitely, without doubt, that someone has been a victim or has been an abuser. So let's start with the first part of what you wrote. You said, I think if you're going to publicly accuse someone of abuse, you should be filing a police report. Have you or do you intend to? If not, why not? I don't mean to pry. I'm just trying to understand everything. By By the way, really appreciate that you're you have a sense of decency. So before I answer your question directly, I think I need to go back and explain about police reports. John, by the way, has mocked me and has come forward as one of his first responses and said, if this legitimate, where are the police reports? So let's talk about police reports, and let's talk about what would be some of those indicators that a story if we're going to focus on someone who is to my knowledge, my non expert, experience, there are several different kinds of people who deal with evidence to do with a crime, and so I'm going to use the word forensic. So in the field of criminology, to my knowledge, my non expert, experience, there's a threshold where there's not enough evidence to fully commit someone is guilty, and then there's a threshold that's crossed where there is enough evidence. So let's view this like a crime scene. My personal testimony shouldn't be enough without further evidence to convict John. And so I second your sentiments that what I've said isn't compelling enough, if that's what you're referring to, isn't compelling enough to convict John, and I never intended for what I am saying alone standing by itself, which again works against the police report issue. I never intended for my own words to convict John, and that's not how it would work in a court situation. So someone with forensic evidence has to have a multitude of evidence before a trial can happen, before the evidence is weighed. So we're just in the beginning stages, and so I second what you are saying which is there just doesn't seem to be enough evidence quite yet, and by the way, I will share with you some of the evidence that you may not be aware of that does incriminate John that's outside of what I'm saying. So we have in John's case we have not only my testimony, we have my 2 siblings who, 1, the younger one, has chosen to place them back and forth. Now it's really hard to read what that could mean. I know what that means, but we see the younger sibling not responding, the middle sibling, so my younger sibling right below me, he is actually being held hostage, quite literally, and so we are working on getting a response, actively working on that, And there's a little bit of behind the scenes work that has to be done, so that is yet to happen. Then as far as other testimony, we have, my ex spouse, my ex husband, who in his own right has come forward and spoken what he's comfortable saying. And again, if you go to my profile, you'll be able to see what, my ex spouse James has said regarding his experience and his thoughts with John. So that's the verbal testimony. We then have Matt Osborne, who has interviewed John's ex business partner. We then have other, detransitioners from the, trans community who have come forward and spoken about how they felt that John took advantage and also covertly abused them. And we have articles on line if you look up the best way to do your own research is to look up John's name, and you'll find online that John was embroiled several years back in a few different incidences. So I wanna pause right there and say, if we were trying this case as someone myself who has an interest in, legal proceedings and forensic evidence, it's significant to note that what you wanna see is the testimony of various people coming forward comes to an agreement or corroborates with very little issues. And while there may be some times where the evidence doesn't fully line up, whether it's a memory issue where a victim is remembering half of the story and then suddenly they remember some of the details later, or you have pieces of evidence that just don't surface until later. As far as this case is concerned, again, if it were on trial, with the evidence that I've presented so far and then the further evidence that I'll mention in a little bit, the overwhelming evidence and John's lack of defense. And if in case you haven't heard, John has been promising, and at some point may come out with, for the past, two and a half to three months, his own response video. Now my gut tells me that that's John's way to stall and sound official and say, well, don't worry. I have my own position coming out because he knows that what's happening is so fact based. If you look at the pushback from John, by the way, if we're looking at an abuser, I'm bouncing back and forth a lot. But I wanna say his reaction, if you go to John's page and you see what you mentioned, where he is posting private photos and videos of his children, he is, creating generalizations such as this is a slime campaign. The people involved are child anthropologists, child molesters. John has yet to provide direct evidence that would contradict the victims and the evidence that is coming forward that seems to be incriminating him. So we don't have a credible, and I'm saying this fact based, you can do your own research. We don't have a credible pushback against the evidence. And with not only so many people coming forward, which again, it could be a scandal where multiple people have been bribed to come forward, we can never look at how many people and say, the majority says this, so therefore this person is guilty. However, it is worth noting that enough people have come forward. I wanna say within 15 to 20 people, and by the way, there are more than that. They might not be aware. Some of his ex victims may not be aware that this issue has come out. There are people who have declined to speak because they are scared of John, showing up at their home quite literally and hurting them, and so they've chosen to speak under condition of remaining anonymous. There are people who just don't wanna bother with this entire thing because, quite frankly, they have better things to do with their time. So again, if we're looking at this in terms of a legal trial, we have verbal testimony not just from a key witness, but from multiple people. The testimony corroborates and agrees with virtually maybe a 1% margin of error. We have then secondly, we have email testimony, and the emails that John decided to share and send to many people, and including myself is enormously helpful because it's John's own words incriminating him. And if you look through if you just type in Euler, uhler, into x, you're going to see lots of screenshots pop up from several people that have been working on this issue. So in John's own words, he leaves hints, he leaves breadcrumbs in his emails, he pre I can't think of the word right now. He predictably programs what he's going to do in the future by making it look like an accident, by making you can tell he's hinting, and then his own actions fulfill what he said he might do. So we have email testimony from John himself that he is actually putting out that would incriminate what John has said. John has lied about his credentials, John has, and I know personally from witnessing firsthand, I would witness John lie, I also know, as many other people do, John ended up getting himself fired from the second prison that he worked at, SCI Somerset. He forged inmates' signatures on some of their treatment plans, as well as possibly some other issues. And after he was let go and his license process was stopped, John ended up pursuing a license and he was not able to, which of course he views as something that might make him look bad, it might be a black mark. In addition, because he is a marriage and family therapist in terms of his credentials, he is hiding his a divorce never happened. His first wife ended up taking her own life, but a divorce was underway. He's hidden that. He's hidden the charges that were brought him, the criminal charges that were brought against him by SCI Somerset. And John also, to further incriminate him, John wanted to get his name in lights and has always wanted to be famous. And so John's first position when he worked at SCI Crescent, about 30 minutes away from the 2nd president, SCI Somerset, he reported inmate abuse that had been going on for quite some time. And John, instead of having a good heart, you start to notice a pattern where John constantly inserts himself and looks for victims so he can play the role of rescuer and survivor and therapist so he can help individuals who are in a position of vulnerability and he can play that life saving role for them, which he then uses. And you'll see on his own he had an old account, by the way, before Elon Musk took over Twitter x. He had an old account where he would post screenshots not only from websites of with no blurs, nothing edited, of girls being abused, children being abused. He would post, private screenshots of one of his clients' journals. He claims that he got permission, but that's just not appropriate for a therapist to be posting someone's private journaling. He posts his experience with inmates and private stories that they shared that he, and I remember this, he did promise not to share. He also and this is something else John has been pushing back against. John has pretended to have worked with 4,000 plus sex offenders while he worked the two prisons for approximately 11 years. And what actually happened, and Matt Osborne has done the math, in his very first exposing John Euler article that he wrote, which you can find either under my profile or you can go to distance mag or the distance magazine and you can read that. So John would, on company time, use his time to read inmate files to familiarize himself in preparation for creating the business that he has right now, which is called, is it survivorshipport.netandchurchprotect? And Unmasking the Trans Movement is his YouTube podcast that he's been working on. So in preparation, what John did was he read inmate files, not worked with inmates that were sex offenders to the degree that he has. I'm going to estimate since John would come home almost every single night and tell us what what he did for the day, on average, the amount of sex offenders he worked with would be between a 150 to 350. Definitely no more than that. Now, no one is saying John hasn't worked with sex offenders, but John's allegations that he transferred from one prison to the next prison after shutting down the first prison because he wanted to get his name in life, didn't actually care, and this is hard to, produce evidence, but this is my allegation that John didn't actually care about the inmates given John's past history with only getting involved in handling abuse cases when it looks good for him. So John certainly can say, I stepped in, I intervened, and that's his perspective. My perspective and others' perspectives after seeing his pattern is he claims to be stepping in for people. But if you look at people who claim to be Safeguarders, who are oftentimes purposely going to put themselves because it makes them look really good. If you don't know the pattern of abusive safeguarders, you need to become aware if that's what space you're in just because they're in a space and they're saying they're there to help. What better way for wolves to get access to sheep than to be in the pen? So there isn't evidence to back up, I'm in a victim's space because I want to help them. In fact, if I or anyone else say that, please question us. Please do not just accept us wholeheartedly. The risk of overlooking red flags and just hearing what someone says. By the way, let me remind you, you don't know me, you're hearing my words, you're as you should be, looking at how I'm conducting myself, you're picking up on anything that could be a red flag, and the problem is though, I am here behind a screen making a video. I can be portraying myself any way that I want to. And it's up to you to decide based on a mere video what do what are your thoughts about me? Same thing with John. You never met John. Most people don't know him personally, and yet they see the profile and the way that he puts himself and portrays himself online as every abuser wants to, and they're concluding something from what they see behind the screen. Now I will say, if you follow John enough, you will notice enough red flags, as many people have, that would lead you to conclude, even if you didn't know what was going on, that he's not a safe person. So we don't listen to the words, including my words. We look at the evidence. And a police report is not necessarily a way to determine if a case is legitimate. So I am on the very first part of what you wrote and this has to do with a very huge issue that is often raised. Again, John has mocked me coming out as I expected him to saying where are the police reports? Well, there's several reasons why, but let me before I explain my position, let's talk about why police reports being a part and factoring in may or may not be a legitimate reason to believe a victim or an abuser. Number 1, did you know that in an effort to sidestep justice, abusers often go to law enforcement and file a police report to circumvent future reports. That way when a victim comes, you can imagine the police are going to having hardly any time on their hands. The police only want to investigate cases which they believe are worth their time. And a police report is only going to be made if there's good cause. So the problem is an abuser will often make a police report with good cause, with lots of evidence, and then when the victim comes forward months or years later, what happens? The police go back through, find the name of the victim, read the report that the abuser submitted, and then the victim has been preemptively stopped in their process of filing anything because the police are going to say, well, looks like you're the problem here. You know, actually, we have a report on you, and then everything falls apart. So number 1, abusers often will go to the police and file a report. So let's say that John has done that. John can make up whatever he wants. And often victims or abusers will make up claims that sound terrible so that the police will be so overwhelmed with allegations, police don't even wanna get involved. Because again, they have to spend their time wisely. I'm not faulting police. I'm saying there are also, individuals in law enforcement that like being in power, which also creates the issue of abusers being in positions of power. So there are plenty of instances, even if police do want to help, where a victim is turned away because the individual is also an abuser who's working in law enforcement. That happens so many more times than I would like to believe. So having a police report may, again, may or may not be an indication of a real situation. Now let's say a victim does go and file a police report. Let's say that let's use myself now. If I had someone who was on my side and in the law, they were giving me the benefit of the doubt, what would happen is they need to have good cause to not only file a report, but to press any kind of charges because the law actually has to work with the victims. Some people believe that you file a report and then the case in law proceeds, but that's not exactly how it works. So if a police report were filed, and by the way, a case can be brought against an individual whether or not a police report is filed. So, there is also what what is called the statute of limitations where time runs out in certain states at a different amount of time, a different rate depending on the state. So someone may be able to bring a report, someone may not be able to bring a report. And then it comes to the issue of, let's say a victim is brainwashed and is raised in a cult and is also told and their life is threatened, it's going to be unrealistic to expect a victim who oftentimes does not have a support system. It's unrealistic to expect them to feel the need to file a report when they are actually putting themselves in jeopardy. Not only that, abuse victims just want to start a new life. They want to move on. And so filing a report, going through the process of the legal the legal process, the court process that's expensive, and even if they file pro se themselves, it takes so much emotional energy and time. Not only that, they need to get a trauma informed therapist, and they're working through their emotions. And on average, it takes at least 2 to 3 years to realize if you're actively working on your trauma, to realize what's happened. And then it takes on average another 2 to 3 years to get to place, so about 6 years, to get to the place where you feel that you could file a report. So going back to the statute of limitations, the law has enacted a statute of limitations, which by the way, comes from people in power not wanting to be exposed because they know, by the way, that it is a fact that victims oftentimes do not come forward. And so they put a statute of limitations, which by the way, were exactly put in place by people in power. It shouldn't be a thing. The fact that there are people decades later who are getting in touch with what happened, they are able to, for the first time, explain the abuse, identify that something was abused. Because if you are made to feel like you're the golden child and the term golden child means that you're being rewarded, you are not experiencing as much abuse as the other people in your family. They don't really have a reason to look at the person who was abusing them and see it as abuse. If someone is a black sheep and is the person that's receiving on the receiving end of the most abuse, well, they would often times be too scared to come forward. So in my case, I was both the golden child and the black sheep. So that puts me in a bit of a unique position. So when we look at statutes of limitations, why they prevent victims and then keep victims. It's like a nondisclosure agreement and NDA. Statutes of limitations work the same way. Once time has run out, it is very difficult, and some states are working to get statutes of limitations taken away. But right now, that's a major issue. So when we look at the process of healing, of getting to the place where you are brave enough, ready enough, you have a support system, that's the most difficult thing. An abuser will talk to your friends and family and prevent you, as did John, from me having a support system. So people will say, well, where are the other people? And in this case, by the way, there are enough people, if we're looking at forensic evidence, that John would have enough individuals coming to speak out with enough stories that corroborate that it wouldn't be hard to find John guilty under just verbal testimony. So when we go back and we look at a situation like mine, I don't have anyone that was permitted by John to be in my life. Gee, I wonder why. Given the fact that they don't want anyone coming forward. I have exactly one person that I was allowed to see and interact with, in my entire childhood and young adulthood. And so I have since learned the value of not allowing an abuser to strip away your friendships and communication, but that that happens especially when you're raised by an abuser. And so you have to remember, if someone is raised by an abuser, they're going to have to come out of a life that they've always known, which is about 20 years for people that have not been kicked out or been in foster care from the time they were a young child. So if you have 20 years that you're not even sure what's going on, it's going to take probably that same amount of time so the average person who's actually going to be, if they're working on their trauma, in a position to speak out, in a position to be healthy. I just turned 30 this year, and I have worked on my trauma more than most people that I know. So the average person would probably be in their forties to mid forties. And that's what I tend to see a lot, is people who have already been married, possibly once or twice, they have children, and now they're in a position where if they had a childhood of abuse, I'm only referring to that situation, they have a family and now they're afraid that they're traumatizing their family because they're experiencing all these emotions, they're in therapy, they're getting in touch with what happened to them, which again, statute of limitations probably has run out by that time. Now let's take a situation where you get to know an abuser in a situation such as marriage or friendship or business partnership. If you have prior childhood trauma, you will possibly not see red flags and could very likely get involved in another abusive situation. Now thankfully there are people who are able to heal in time and wake up and that doesn't happen to them, but when you have a situation that's different and it's more voluntary in a sense that you're getting to know someone as an adult that is abusive. It's there's not as much pressure as there would be on a child who's a child of an abuser. There are more avenues for help. There's a greater knowledge base. Right? You would hear from places online, from maybe other resources, that there is help. There's therapy. There's many different ways that you can work on yourself. So an adult is always going to be more well equipped. So I wanna say, when people say why didn't a child of abuse, why didn't a young victim file a police report? I think that should answer its own question. We can't come to any victim and tell them how they should be responding. We cannot come to a victim who's an adult and say, you made the wrong choice because I guarantee you that piles on to the guilt and the shame, the false guilt and shame, and the dreams, the nightmares, the literal dreams and nightmares of how could I have done that over again? I wish I could redo that. There's such regret and such loss. And so to say to a victim, you could have done it differently when there are so many factors of why they didn't that we need to believe they didn't do it for a very good reason. So when we're talking to a victim who is a child, there's no place to say, where is the police report? How could there be? That that wouldn't even make a difference because let's say the child came forward, would they be believed? Would the adults in their life call them a liar? How would they be able to stand up against highly, in John's case, a highly emotionally manipulative parent who knows how to say all the right things, who puts on a face and then knows how to take it off. Would a child, if there was a police report, and the answer is no. What is the likelihood that a child would be able to look that person in the eye without fear and be able to carry through? It doesn't mean that the child didn't want to file a report. I can't tell you how many years my brother and I wanted to file a report. And yet because abusers oftentimes intentionally put themselves in positions such as law enforcement, positions such as attorneys, doctors, pastors, and positions where there is trust and victims involved. The victim knows they have no power. And to go to law enforcement would exploit them further. I wanna say that again. You or anyone else who says, where are the reports are assuming that a victim should be exploited further if they didn't feel safe. It's important to recognize that. John, again, many abusers mock their victims saying, where are the police reports? The police reports are what they want. Let me also spin it a different direction. Imagine if a police report gave you a record, right, in the law system that you as an abuser have already spoken and given your side. That's a permanent record. How is a victim going to counter when, again, your point, Claire, is I don't see enough evidence. Well, that's exactly what law enforcement and the court is going to say. They're going to pull up the records and say, do we have any records in the past? And if they do, it could be so long ago that now the victim is also trying to play double duty saying, how do I answer the current allegations and the past? So my decision is I'm not going to focus and I don't believe many of us should focus as the sole focus on police reports because it is evidence that can be muddied. Anyone who deals with forensics knows you want to be very careful, and you want to kind of consider as a third option any evidence that's muddied. They will put that on the back burner because we wanna deal with the current evidence. So let me keep reading what you have. 2nd paragraph, I myself am a victim of several types of abuses. I'm going to keep it private by the way in case you don't want people knowing, but I don't name the people publicly because I cannot prove it. I am always a bit hesitant to take a side in a public he said, she said, because I have known as many vindictive, lying, evil women as I have men. To your point in my story, Trisha Euler, who was my mom, John's first wife, was the main abuser and aggressor. And I have seen also, to your point, many women who masquerade as safe women. And in fact, the number of abusive women has risen recently. So I fully see your point on that. I wanna pause really quickly and dig in to where you said, I don't name people publicly because I cannot prove it. I'm a bit hesitant to take a place in a side in a back and forth. You know, that is an assumption, and you're entitled to believe that, by the way. It's an assumption that we can't prove something, so it's not worth coming forward. You know, what abusers don't want, and I hope to validate you in this, what abusers don't want is someone speaking out. So what they'll do is they'll minimize saying, where are the police reports? Where is the evidence? It's not big enough. You haven't done well enough. Did you know that after I posted, after I gave my testimony, John said, I don't know you. I don't know who this person is. You don't have enough testimony. Good try. Nice try. That wasn't enough. You just you just hit the tip of the iceberg. There's more. Good luck next time. John is mocking me because he wants there to be such distress on my part and such trauma. He's trying to re traumatize me. So I just wanna say, why wouldn't you wanna come out? Why wouldn't you? I'm not saying you specifically. Why isn't it worth it? And for some people it is not and it's not the right time and so this is not me blaming anyone. I'm saying for myself, I have made the decision that even if nothing happens in terms of justice, I want the process of my healing to include speaking my truth, which is very validating, by the way. If you've never done that, I think you should give yourself the benefit of the doubt. Speak even to yourself. Journal, record your voice, tell your story. It doesn't need to be public. I was comfortable doing that, and I am no better than anyone else. I just was given this opportunity, and I felt ready. But I will tell you, there would have definitely been a time that I would not have been ready. So there's no shame that we should not be telling anyone how they should process, how they should speak out. That is inappropriate. That is not our place to say that. Everyone else has a very private story. We need to honor that. Just for me, this is what I felt comfortable with doing. Now I will tell you as someone who was unsure how this would affect me, it's been so positive. Not only have I had the support of people coming forward, and by the way, I did not speak out because I wanted support. I am so used to not having support and being torn down, by people that knew John, that John had spoken ill of about me, that I've gone through most of my life with no support. So this wasn't to get support. This was because I knew it's better to speak out for me than to hold it all in because why suffer in silence? You know? And even though I'd moved to a place of peace and I'd moved a place of having a life, it felt so freeing to not be carrying these secrets inside. So I wanna encourage anyone that's curious, speak it out loud to yourself. Have some personal time. Talk about it. Maybe that will help. It's helped me tremendously. Going to the next part, you said, I've seen the photos your dad shared, and you all look very happy. I know this isn't evidence and pictures can lie, but I think abused children often have a look about the eyes and a look about them, and you can't mistake it when you see the when you were also an abused child. You seemed like normal people. The body language was close in the photos, etcetera, with genuine smiles, but then what do I know? So I appreciate, by the way, that you are giving the benefit of the doubt. The photos. So one thing that I find interesting about photos of children who have been abused is there are times where you can tell. I agree. Eyes have been statistically shown for abusers, by the way, I would say, look at John's eyes. John's eyes are actually a giveaway of an abuser. The eyes of me and my brothers, if I'm talking just about us. So my brother and I have autism, so we always have a photo face. It's our it's our canned face. And I remember in some of the photos, we were told to smile. In other ones, we were told to or we had just had a rare wonderful moment, so it may have been a genuine smile. And with children, yes, you can and you can't tell. It depends on the age. Right? Young children, you can tell, almost always. And I've done enough research on the eyes of victims and the eyes of abusers, and I know exactly what you're saying. What I would say is, first of all, look at John's eyes. There are some photos where he's getting what he wants, so he's genuinely happy. You will see he's genuinely happy in those photos. But when it comes to, happy in those photos. But when it comes to body language, there are so many factors that we can and can't take into account. So when it comes to photos, I think, if you're looking at our photos, you wouldn't know if we were told to stand close. You think if you're looking at our photos, you wouldn't know if we were told to stand close. You wouldn't know when we were told what to do. And so that's not a good metric or indicator if something would be true or not. The next part. I did listen to your recordings discussing it, and I didn't find your testimony compelling if I am honest. I know that isn't nice to hear. Your tone was pretty flat throughout the entire thing. There was little emotion, and that can indicate that someone is lying or has a personality disorder. So I get where you're coming from. I'm also very attuned, to people's tone and people's body language. You know, a misconception about autism is that we are not aware, but actually we're hyper aware. It's a safety, reflex. So first of all, super aware that my voice is flat. When Matt interviewed me, it was just a voice interview. I was nervous, and so I didn't wanna appear overly emotional. I kind of have highs and lows where sometimes I'm emotional and sometimes I'm not. So in an effort to sound believable, I didn't wanna sound overly emotional. So I did purposely make my voice flatter. So that's true. It is flat. By the way, I haven't listened to my voice voice testimony from what Matt recorded because the details are so horrific and awful for me to relive that I actually have not listened to any of my voice testimony. My my ex husband, James, did, but I haven't. So I haven't even listened to myself. I just wanted to add that and say, I totally know what you're saying. My voice is flat, especially when I'm nervous. And so I was wanting to convey that I wasn't being overly emotional because you know what people say about women. They say they're emotional, they can't be believed. And I was actually nervous that someone would say, if she's too emotional or aggressive, she's faking it. She's putting on the emotion. So I'd kinda rather be flat, but I understand what you're saying. Now the personality disorder, that's actually not an indication, necessarily. I think that's pulling a little bit too much out. If you look at vocal tone and you look at if you watch some YouTube videos on forensic, body language psychoanalysts, I think, they they do measure vocal tone. But what I've seen is ah, there it is. They're going to measure the overall consistency. So if you watch 10 videos, and you see or you watch a part of a video, or you listen and you grab a part that sounds normal and then a part that might be unusual, you wanna measure the unusual part against the part that is the majority. So what you said actually would disagree with the facts in your tone was pretty flat throughout the entire thing. Therefore, if it's flat the entire way, yes, you don't have a way of knowing if that's how I talk or not, but also if there isn't anything unusual, no unusual spikes changes, then that could indicate someone is actually telling the truth. So I just wanted to add that. But again, I'm very hyper aware of people's voice. I do like to analyze them, so I'm totally right there with you. Now next part. Now I'm not saying you are lying or mental, appreciate that, but it does mean I would require more evidence to believe a man who dedicates his career to exposing abusers that he is actually one given all of the above that I mentioned. I hope you and your father can reconcile in some way if he is innocent. If he isn't, I hope they lock him up and throw away the key. God bless. Thanks for reading my long comment. I think it's more productive than shouting or going back and forth. Okay. Appreciate the last part, by the way. So the assumption, again, is a bit of a dangerous one to assume that a man who has dedicated his career. On the surface, yes, and I see where you're coming from. John had me fooled somewhat, thinking that he was an abuse advocate. And you'll have to stay tuned if you wanna know more throughout the videos that I post. Again, this video that I've made is directed to answer, specific questions I knew people would have. So I will say I wish that my father really did, dedicate his career to exposing abusers, but that's not what I see. When you look at John's obsessive interest in abuse psychology, victim psychology. When you look at what safeguarding abusers, and I mean safeguarding in quotations, what safeguarding abusers will say will do, John's actions and words match up. When you look at how he has treated abuse victims in the past, there was an incident where and I can share some screenshots with you, where John was making fun of a woman who came out years ago. John's favorite pastor is named John MacArthur. In fact, many of the men that John follow have been exposed for severe and serious abuse. John MacArthur has also been very abusive, and he has a university that's called the Masters University. A woman came forward as, Jane Doe as her name being undisclosed. There were police reports. So I just wanna show you how John has switched from saying where are the police reports? This woman came forward. John has a man crush on John MacArthur and he was angry. John was angry that John MacArthur was being outed as an abuser. So instead of hearing what the woman said, he said, this woman is not legitimate because she hasn't revealed her name. She hasn't called out the abusers, which, of course, was John's attempt to get the woman to come forward so he could abuse her, so he could dox her, so he could find out her friends, her family, and do what he always does, which is, turn things into a cult, turn people against the victim. Well, now that his John's own daughter has come for me, instead of him admitting, wow, she's not hiding, as he loves to say to people online. If you look at some of the quotes that he said, it's you're hiding. That means you're a perp. That means you don't wanna be known. So here I come boldly with videos, with evidence, with more evidence still to come. And instead of him saying, that's that's exactly what I would need to know I was an abuser. Why would he call himself out as an abuser? Now the story is where are the police reports? So instead of believing Jane Doe's police reports, it was you're hiding behind your name, behind your anonymous, source of a name. And now that his daughter has come forward, it's where are the police reports. And if there were police reports, and if I came forward, it would be, wow, she really loves to make up lies, which by the way he said that about me, that I'm unstable, that I am emotionally manipulative, that I lie, that I, am siding with abusers. However, he won't prove where I'm lying, and he just blocked me the other day because he doesn't which is not smart for him because now he doesn't know what I'm posting about him. But he doesn't have anything to say against the evidence. So I wish that he were a safe guarder. I wish that he cared about victims, but that's just not what we see. So he was making fun and, being very vindictive and posting resources for women that were defending Jane that were quote unquote attacking John MacArthur, and these resources were from other abusers. John has stated that he loves to play games with people. He loves to breadcrumb. He loves to really play the part of a safe guarder. And you don't have to take my word for that. When you watch John's behavior, he has the duper's delight smile, which is a smile that abusers have, where they love the fact that they are receiving or playing a role that's genuine. And so you'll see John do that in many of his videos and photos. He also will lie boldly, and you see documents that are coming forward now. He's lied saying he wasn't married before he was married to a second wife. He was never, indicted and had criminal charges from the 2nd prison he worked at. He has had experience with 4,000 plus, which he then changed the number years ago, 4,000 plus sex offenders. He lied about that. On average, it's 150 350. He lied about his passion about protecting victims. I will say John was never passionate about protecting sex abuse victims or being in the space of trans until it was popular. He was never into that. He lies and says that he knew about furries, but yet we don't see or hear him speaking about furries until 2020 when he says that he knew and, was going to speak out about it a lot sooner. He lies and says that he has worked with abuse victims for years, when really he didn't start out with abuse victims. He even in one of his unmasking the trans podcast that he did in 2 weeks prior, I think, he said, I'm not a trauma informed therapist, then he referred to the woman he was with on the podcast and said, I know you are a trauma informed therapist. Then 2 to 3 weeks later, he said he was a trauma informed therapist. Basically, John says things he doesn't live up to them. There's evidence in plenty of emails, plenty of photos online that would go to the contrary. So we just wanna look at the evidence. We don't wanna take Nicole my testimony. We don't wanna just take things and view them as just one incident. We wanna look at the overall flow, what do we see, and what we see makes someone look pretty guilty. Now I wanna say this is the last point. Safeguarders need to have a motive that comes from a place of genuine care and desire. If you look at people like John, they have figured out the age old tactic of appearing to be a sheep and knowing how to speak the language, literally spending research hours figuring out how to look like a sheep. And the red flags that appear is John is more interested in his reputation. And while he does, no one is disputing. You can prove, if you would like to, that anyone is disputing that everything John says is false. That would make him way too obvious. He says intentionally things that he knows makes him look good that are mostly true, and then he gives his own spin, or he misleads people, or he omits facts. John is the classic. He gives 10% truth and 90% lie. He predictably programs and says, if I were to, and then he does exactly that. So when you're looking at a liar posing as a safeguarded, we should expect things to not line up. We should expect that there is a mask. Once the mask begins to slip, we need to pay attention to those red flags. Now, I wanna clarify last and first and foremost, the people speaking out against John, who are coming as part of this movement right now, the majority of them are not coming against John because of what he's saying about trans, because what he's saying about furries. And some people are saying, John's receiving a lot of hate, but, you know, abusers oftentimes get protected because they're saying, look how much people hate them. That must be on that must mean that they're onto something good. That must mean that they are being attacked because they're in the right. You'll see that a lot as part of a campaign to protect the abuser. Now, granted that people who come across John, like yourself, are not familiar, and I'm not saying that you're purposely protecting John. What I'm saying is, we need to understand that John's position is that he is an expert in whatever he decides he's going to be an expert in. So in this case, John has decided that he's going to be an expert in trans and in furries because it makes him popular. It gets him money. It gets him views. He wants to be John has always done this. John's pattern is to find, just like he reported this first prison that he worked out without supposed pure motives, he wanted to get his name in headlights. And he uses, I reported the prison, to appear famous. And then when he got fired, he then retaliated by getting his prior boss fired. But he did not report his boss in the 4 to 5 years between the prison being shut down and John being fired. So you look and you see there are just things that do not add up. So to end, what qualifies someone to be a safeguarded? That's a broad question. I think the motive is going to be difficult to tell on the surface. Someone who has a camera is an actor for all we know. You don't know me, and you should question what I'm saying. And when we find evidence to the contrary, we need to start stacking it up. We need to start believing what we're seeing. When we see pushback, either against the abuser or against people that are quote, unquote the victims, we need to understand that there could be ulterior motives and handle it with a grain of salt. So as far as I'm concerned, I will continue to speak out. You are free to hear what I say or not to. Either way, I will continue to speak out. And I am confident as someone that believes that is a holy spirit filled believer, as a born again believer, that God brings truth and God brings all things to light. John's biggest reason why he's being exposed is because he preaches a false Jesus. He preaches a false gospel, and God is not pleased with him. I can tell you that for sure. John has boldly gone into a space in which he knows very little about and has also abused people spiritually. And as I believe there is a real God, that real God is coming back against John telling him, you better watch what you're saying because he's listening. And so I know for a fact that the real God is giving John justice. John is maligning who God is. John is treading in very dangerous territory. He has posed himself as an abuse advocate. He also, in case you didn't know, he is very spiritually abusive. And I believe as a holy spirit filled born again believer, God is very angry with him. And God is finally answering not only my prayers, but the prayers of many abuse victims. And in case you haven't noticed, there are many pastors around the US that are finally being exposed for their dark crimes. That, I believe, is God directly stepping in and finally exposing what's happening. And so I just wanna say, John has unfortunately entered into dangerous territory where he's using the name of God. He's twisting what who God is. He's twisting God's justice. He's literally John told me, I condemn you and damn you to hell and the lake of fire because I represent God. John has stepped into shoes that are too big for him to fill. He has played a double life. And so really at the end of this is John's spiritual abuse catching up with him. And so he can no longer play God. That's why he's so angry. And anyone that pretends to be a follower of Jesus and takes the position that John has, Jesus had very very strong words. God had very words when he was here on this earth and condemned anyone that uses a position of God and a position of truth, and then takes someone and abuses them further. In fact, did you know God in the flesh, Jesus, said, it would be better in the long run for someone who is an abuser, who is taking someone and discouraging a victim, and abusing them for a millstone to be put you think a millstone was a very large stone, very heavy, placed around the neck of an abuser, and then to be dropped into an abyss of the ocean, than for them to face God not only in the next life in the prison of hell, which is located under the earth, and for them to be thrown into the lake of fire after the great white throne judgment, it would be better for them to self destruct and to take themselves out than to face what's coming. That is what's happening to John. My prayers to God are being answered directly. And so there is nowhere John can run and can hide. And I just wanna say on behalf of everyone that has been spiritually abused, that is hearing what I'm saying, God sees you, God hears you, ask him for justice, he's going to give that to you. And God does not tolerate liars. So no matter what John says or what John does, I'm not here to defend or protect or speak out against or take any position other than that which is true. And I hope that you would do the same. So true is going to win out, and thank the Lord that we do still have truth. And so I believe that God is leading, people to see the truth about John, and John and his blindness and his pride is now going too far in what he's saying in terms of trying to shut down this investigation, in terms of him not having answers to what has been brought against him, in terms of him playing the role of God, telling people who do love the real God, that they are going to hell, that they are, damned, and what a convenient way, right, to hold all the power, and be willing to believe that you are someone special and chosen as John does. So be careful with how much you get involved with John. I would encourage anyone who's questioning what's being said, as they should be to look at some of the backlog of photo, text, email evidence, and really just consider the weight of that. Thank you for listening. I hope that what I've shared even though it's long is an end up look at why John is just another spiritual abuser posing as a safeguarded who is unqualified and is going to be dethroned from his position. So thank you, and I hope to have further conversations that are helpful and see if we can make progress in coming against abusive people.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

@DistMag @OsborneInk 29. A thread containing some info related to Jon’s abruptly-ended video of his interview with former colleague, Ken Herdman.

@autogampegg - respectable egg

It’s been TWO WHOLE YEARS and @uhler_jon still hasn’t posted part 3 of his interview with former prison psych staff colleague, Ken Herdman. Why not? 1/ https://t.co/FXF7CTYpkX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions the safety of transferring inmates, particularly those identifying as women, into women's institutions. He claims that while about 50% may be labeled sex offenders, the remaining half may still pose a danger due to plea bargaining practices. This can result in individuals who committed sex-related crimes not being officially classified as sex offenders in their records. Speaker 1 echoes this concern, suggesting that regardless of sex offender status, placing any long-term male inmate in a women's prison is inherently risky. The interview with Ken Herdman is then cut short due to time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the question is, are we putting dangerous inmates and is it ever safe to send any mail in there? My contention and then I'll ask you the question. My contention is, you can have a lot of different guys apply for, so suddenly identify with a woman, they'll say, well, about 50% are sex offenders. That on paper looks like, well, the other half wouldn't be dangerous. That's because people don't understand about the plea bargaining situation. Can somebody commit a sex related crime, get charges but not be convicted so on paper in their file, it appears like they are not a sex offender. Speaker 1: I'm trying to collect my thoughts. Sex offender or not, you take a guy who's going to be locked up for a number of years, sex offender or not, transfer him into a women's institution, and what the hell do you think is going to happen? Speaker 0: Well, we'll have to interrupt the interview with Ken Herdman at this point due to time constraints, but be sure to join us for the 3rd and final part of this important interview.
Saved - September 4, 2024 at 9:51 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

🚨 CONTENT WARNING: Did you know that transgender surgery on children began in the 1960s? And that its pioneer was a staff member of @JohnsHopkins who was later discovered to be a child abuser? Background: Bruce Reimer was the elder of infant twin boys born in 1965. When Bruce was seven or eight months old, his parents Janet and Ron had him circumcised. The physician botched the procedure and the infant's penis was burned off. Bruce’s parents Janet and Ron then approached John Money, a professor of pediatrics and medical psychology at Johns Hopkins University, to inquire whether Money’s recently published theories on “gender roles” and “sexual orientation” — both new terms invented by Money — might provide some help for their injured son. Money told them, in short, that the answer was to raise their injured son as a girl. They proceeded to have Bruce castrated, administered feminizing hormones, and brought in for office visits to Money throughout childhood wherein “therapies” were given to Bruce that involved pornography and “sexual rehearsal play” with his twin brother. At the age of 13, Bruce (who’d been called “Brenda” since infancy) was so distraught that his local psychotherapist insisted that his parents tell him the truth about himself. As soon as Bruce learned the truth, he insisted on living as a male, and even re-named himself “David” (as in David-against-Goliath). Decades later as an adult, David publicly revealed what happened to him in childhood. Several books and articles were published about his testimony — a comprehensive list is available from the Intersex Society of North America: https://isna.org/faq/reimer/. Sadly, David’s story came to an end when he committed suicide at the age of 38. No one knows these kinds of stories better than @Miriam_Grossman, M.D., a 40-year child psychiatrist who encounters gender dysphoria as the dominant complaint at her busy practice.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a 5000% increase in adolescents suddenly expressing discomfort with their bodies, which parents report seems to appear "out of the blue." This rapid onset gender dysphoria is often found in kids with conditions like autism, depression, anxiety, trauma, or abuse, and in difficult family situations. This phenomenon tends to happen in clusters, with many kids identifying as transgender or non-binary having friends who also identify that way. This suggests an element of social contagion, where feelings, behaviors, or beliefs spread within a friend group. Some children's social lives are primarily online, where they are influenced to question their identity and assume a new one, sometimes by older individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are dealing now with this epidemic, 5000% increase of kids who never before adolescents who never before expressed discomfort with their bodies and it's rapid onset because it develops the parents say that it seems to them to be out of the blue. That they were that their child for many years was happy, content with being a boy or a girl, and then there's a change. It is found in kids who have comorbid conditions such as autism, depression, anxiety, a history of trauma, of being molested, of being abused, and, all all sorts of family situations and difficulties. Also, it it tends to happen in clusters. So most of the kids that are coming now and identifying as being transgender or non binary, if you ask them, they have someone in their friend group, at least one, commonly a few of their friends who are also identifying in that way and there have, you know, new names, new pronouns. So there's an element of contagion. Social contagion is a well known phenomenon in mental health. What it means is that feelings or behaviors or beliefs can spread within a friend group. It's very common now to be best friend have a whole group of friends that are online. You never met them. You may not know, you know, where they're from. And I've had a number of cases of kids coming into my office in which their social life is primarily online. And that they have been influenced, to to question who they are and to assume a new identity only because of people that have they have met online. Sometimes older individuals who are bringing them into this belief system.
Who was David Reimer (also, sadly, known as John/Joan)? | Intersex Society of North America David Reimer was born an identical (non-intersex) twin boy in 1965. At the age of 8 months, David and his brother each had a minor medical problem involving his penis, and a doctor decided to treat the problem with circumcision. The doctor botched the circumcision on David, using an inappropriate method and accidentally burning off virtually all of David’s penis. At the advice of psychologist John Money at Johns Hopkins University, David’s parents agreed to have him “sex reassigned” and made into a girl via surgical, hormonal, and psychological treatments—i.e., via the system Money advocated for intersex children. isna.org

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Full interview with @maryhollandnyc + @Miriam_Grossman: https://t.co/wFSkkxnxlB

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

Doctors Medical Certification Revoked + Lost In Transnation https://t.co/57VWqM4JPe

Saved - March 7, 2025 at 7:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring the connections surrounding James Lindsay and various organizations. His affiliations with the Aspen Center for Human Development, Heterodox Academy, and Braver Angels raise questions about their influences and funding sources. Notably, he collaborates with figures linked to the Koch network and has cross-promoted with controversial groups like NXIVM. Additionally, his relationships with individuals like Jonathan Rauch and organizations such as FIRE and the Manhattan Institute suggest a broader network of ideological alignment. The implications of these ties are worth examining.

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

I wonder what James Lindsay was doing as a fellow at Aspen Center for Human Development under Pamela Paresky (who's on the board of Jewish Institute For Liberal Values associated with Tikvah Fund, and Roger Hertog from Manhattan Institute)? Interesting recommendations from JILV

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

@realChrisBrunet David Bernstein: Jewish Institute for Liberal Values, Tikvah Fund Roger Hertog: Tikvah Fund, Manhattan Institute Christina Buttons: Manhattan Institute & (formerly?) JILV Pamela Paresky: JILV, Aspen Center for Human Development James Lindsay: ACHD fellow

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

I see they promote FAIR, which is very involved with Genspect (as is Manhattan Institute and James Lindsay)

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

I've noticed more and more papers in woke studies using a methodology termed "action research," which is essentially just organizing a leftist public activism event and having participants reflect on their experiences.

@SwipeWright - Colin Wright

I've noticed more and more papers in woke studies using a methodology termed "action research," which is essentially just organizing a leftist public activism event and having participants reflect on their experiences. This approach is being presented as legitimate science.

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

I'd forgotten all about Heterodox Academy (Koch associated?), which did a bunch of cross promotion with Lindsay and NXIVM cult members (who Lindsay also cross promoted with directly)

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

Did you know Clyne (and other NXIVM connected people) cross promote with Heterodox Academy? Does it surprise you that Heterodox Academy cross promotes with Lindsay? Or that Heterodox Academy is conspicuously tied to Koch? https://caitiegutierrez.medium.com/nxivm-sex-cult-is-actively-recruiting-through-instagram-influencers-like-clementine-morrigan-and-21eea3115e81

NXIVM Sex Cult is Actively Recruiting Through Influencers Clementine Morrigan and Seerut K. Chawla NXIVM cult leader Nicki Clyne has publicly endorsed Clementine Morrigan, an influencer from Montreal, and Seerut K. Chawla, a licensed psychotherapist in London who is a member of Heterodox Academy —… caitiegutierrez.medium.com

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

We already knew James Lindsay was associated with Braver Angels (a Fetzer Institute partner)

@TAmaruIV - Vince Black

Lindsay didn’t “stumble” into Fetzer. He collaborated with Fetzer directly via their partner Braver Angels. All your promoted “influencers” are liars and frauds. All of them.

@ConceptualJames - James Lindsay, anti-Communist

When I first stumbled into this by studying Social-Emotional Learning, thus the Fetzer Institute, thus John Fetzer, thus Alice Bailey, thus Helena Blavatsky, I suffered four or five months of severe atrial fibrillation and thought I was going to die.

@ConceptualJames - James Lindsay, anti-Communist

When I first stumbled into this by studying Social-Emotional Learning, thus the Fetzer Institute, thus John Fetzer, thus Alice Bailey, thus Helena Blavatsky, I suffered four or five months of severe atrial fibrillation and thought I was going to die.

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

James Lindsay has frequently promoted Jonathan Rauch and seems to think he's brilliant. Pamela Paresky and Jonathan Rauch were both fellows at the Institute for Humane Studies, weird!

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression) is Koch connected. Greg Lukianoff's the CEO. Pamela Paresky was Chief Research Officer. FIRE frequently cross promotes with James Lindsay. Weird!

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

How many of these organizations have you seen cross promoting James Lindsay? How many of them have you noticed him contributing writing to, speaking at conferences, doing podcasts, etc.?

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

James Lindsay's publisher is from Vamik Volkan, advisor to CoExist founded by Alan Slifka who's a member of the Executive Committee of the American Jewish Congress and founder of the Abraham Fund, whose board members include Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

James Lindsay worked w/ Christopher Rufo at Color Us United, advocating for "a race-blind America", registered as "The Center for Race and Opportunity" through the IRS. It has already been established Rufo is part of a Soros & Singer backed Israeli spy network. Who funds CUU?

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

James Lindsay has contributed to City Journal (Manhattan Institute) and has been frequently cross promoted by both

@federalgroyper - fedgroyper

James Lindsay is shilling. He's paid by Manhattan Institute via City Journal. City Journal editor in chief is Claire Berlinski. She is Jewish and is a fellow at the Gatestone Institute, a Jewish Zionist think tank.

@realChrisBrunet - Chris Brunet

notice how Chris Rufo is now going out of his way not to associate with James Lindsay?

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

"I have just returned from a flight from Tel Aviv after meeting with the government of Israel - for the support of the sovereign Nation of Israel" — Michael O’Fallon, owner of New Discourses (as of 2019), which James Lindsay has some business relationship with

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

Some other faculty listed at the Aspen Center For Human Development alongside James Lindsay (directed by Pamela Paresky): Bret Stephens Bret Weinstein Heather Heying Peter Boghossian Helen Pluckrose (h/t @FringeViews)

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

John Hagee is the founder and Chairman of Christians United for Israel (CUFI), the largest pro-Israel organization in the United States

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

If you’re curious about where James Lindsay stole a significant amount of his “work” and strategy, start here. Coughlin’s role in the game Lindsay’s playing is a very big open question, especially following their original public collab via Courtenay Turner https://unconstrainedanalytics.org/report-re-remembering-the-mis-remembered-left-the-lefts-strategy-and-tactics-to-transform-america/

REPORT: Re-Remembering the Mis-Remembered Left: The Left’s Strategy and Tactics To Transform America The increased hostility from the Left resonates a violence that is becoming a clear and present danger. This estimate will use a political warfare analysis to reframe the political environment in order to provide timely anticipatory situational awareness in support of decision-making. unconstrainedanalytics.org

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

Lindsay’s director Pamela Paresky and his idol Jonathan Rauch at the Koch funded Institute for Humane Studies (cc @Tentoads4truth)

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

Who were the “anonymous donors” behind Lindsay’s “Grievance Studies Hoax” which he admits being paid to produce?

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

@ShrekTriad - The Dead Flag Blues

Here’s @ConceptualJames, @SwipeWright, @buttonslives (pornstar) and @libbyemmons working with NXIVM sex cultist Nicki Clyne, whose imprisoned leader Keith Raniere was represented by Epstein lawyer Alan Dershowitz. These people were promoted by Heterodox Academy (Koch)

@pcexaminer - Post-Critical Examiner

@ShrekTriad Clare Bronfman "daughter of billionaire and former World Jewish Congress chair pled guilty" "Bronfman reportedly spent over $150 million dollars to fund the self-proclaimed multi-level marketing firm, Nxivm" https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/1601522997-heiress-of-prominent-jewish-philanthropist-family-jailed-for-funding-sex-cult

Heiress of prominent Jewish philanthropist family jailed for funding sex cult - i24NEWS Daughter of beverage billionaire and former World Jewish Congress chair pled guilty last year i24news.tv
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 3:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that detransitioners will be sharing their stories on Capitol Hill for Detrans Awareness Day 2025, aiming to foster awareness and understanding. I highlighted powerful testimonies from various events, including ChoooCole's live episode at the Bigger Picture Denver conference and Abel's insights on transition and detransition from a male perspective during our 2023 webinar. Forrest recounted his journey through transition and regret, while Sorenaldaco discussed the shortcomings of "gender-affirming care." Laura Becker also provided valuable insights into trauma and detransition.

@genspect - Genspect

🧵 Meet the detransitioners who will share their stories on Capitol Hill for #DetransAwarenessDay 2025 (March 12th). Their courageous testimonies will help bring awareness and understanding to this important discussion. Register for the event: https://genspect.org/announcing-detrans-awareness-day-2025/ @JenniferLahl

Detrans Awareness Day 2025 — Genspect Detrans Awareness Day on Capitol Hill Register for the event. Genspect is proud to bring together medical professionals, policymakers, and members of the public to meet detransitioners face-to-face to help facilitate meaningful change. Since its inception in 2021, Detrans Awareness Day has played a crucial role in raising international awareness about detransition. Thanks in large […] genspect.org

@genspect - Genspect

.@ChoooCole told her powerful story in a live episode of @widerlenspod from our Bigger Picture Denver conference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aer7KqiWu64 https://t.co/BwnqskY3MY

@genspect - Genspect

.@OfficialAbelG discussed transition and detransition from a male perspective in our 2023 Detrans Awareness Day webinar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLUyzlrFDk0 https://t.co/KCeMJka1wl

@genspect - Genspect

During our live WPATH Files webinar last year, Forrest shared his personal story, beginning with childhood and detailing his journey through adolescence, transition, surgery, regret, and detransition: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shuoOdBJ04s https://t.co/ifJeMYz8IB

@genspect - Genspect

.@sorenaldaco shared with @IWF on how "gender-affirming care" failed her and how she found peace outside of medicalization: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FD_brjpAk2c https://t.co/C8NFVXdfe4

@genspect - Genspect

.@LauraBeckerReal insightfully explored trauma, transition, and detransition in our 2022 Detrans Awareness Day webinar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsLz8at11P4 https://t.co/Ti3xRviJtQ

Saved - March 5, 2025 at 9:44 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Sex change surgery severely harms mental health

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

New research from the University of Texas shows that all the justifications for mutilating children were lies. They analyzed more than 100,000 patients with gender dysphoria, and looked at the outcomes for those who received surgery vs. those who didn't. Depression, anxiety, suicidal feelings and drug abuse were all "significantly higher" for those who received surgery compared to those who didn't. Let's repeat that: Treating gender dysphoria with sex change surgery was linked with drastically WORSE mental health outcomes. Phony doctors belong in prison for what they did to our children. https://www.foxnews.com/health/trans-surgeries-increase-risk-mental-health-conditions-suicidal-ideations-study?intcmp=tw_fnc

Trans surgeries increase risk of mental health conditions, suicidal ideations: study "Gender-affirming surgery" could lead to dangerous mental health effects, a new study has found. Transgender individuals experienced depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation two years after surgery. foxnews.com
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 12:25 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Mental health counselor who’s a man pretending to be a woman, boasts about transing kids as he speaks against Montana SB 164 which would criminalize s*x change surgery and cross-s*x hormones for minors This is how desperate they are to mutilate your kids. https://t.co/DZhobOdKON

Video Transcript AI Summary
A therapist's client, a young teen entering puberty, understands that their gender does not align with their sex assigned at birth and wants to explore hormones or blockers. The supportive parents scheduled an endocrinologist appointment. The physician informed the parents that if SB 164 were to pass, providing gender-affirming care could lead to the doctor and parents being arrested and imprisoned. The client was devastated by the prospect of their care leading to the loss of their parents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This client of mine is in their early teens just entering puberty, and they have a clear understanding that their gender does not align with their sex assigned at birth. In therapy with me, they expressed their desire to explore options for starting hormones or blockers before their puberty advances further. One minute. So with my guidance, their parents who are loving and fully supportive recently scheduled an appointment with an endocrinologist to discuss an assessment and possible treatment options. During that appointment, my client was subjected to a truly traumatizing experience listening as the physician informed their parents that if SB 164 were to pass, proceeding with any gender affirming care for my client could lead to both the doctor and their parents being arrested and imprisoned. My client was devastated. Imagine your own child being placed in this situation, told that the price of their own care and well-being is the loss of their parents. Would you stand for it? Can you vote for a bill which causes such harm?
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 11:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Gabor Maté, a retired physician, argues that conditions like cancer, ADHD, and addiction stem from childhood trauma rather than genetics. He critiques modern medicine for its focus on physical symptoms while neglecting emotional and social factors. Maté identifies a toxic culture as a contributor to mental health issues and emphasizes the link between emotional suppression and chronic disease. He advocates for a unified mind-body approach and holistic healing practices, asserting that compassion can activate the body's natural healing mechanisms.

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

Big Pharma doesn't want you to know him: Meet Gabor Mate. This retired physician says Cancer, ADHD & Addiction are rooted in Childhood Trauma—not genetics. Here are his 6 principles for healing Trauma & Disease naturally: 🧵 https://t.co/rFyiZJ1nLY

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

1. Modern medicine is flawed. Modern medicine treats disease as physical, but emerging science shows that the root causes are often psycho-emotional. Despite this, the medical system still ignores the role of emotions and stress in disease. They only focus on treating the physical symptoms.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The mind and body are not separable; they function as one unit, or "body mind." The emotional system, immune system, nervous system, and hormonal apparatus are different manifestations of the same system. Healthy anger protects boundaries, and emotions in general let in what's healthy while keeping out what is not. The immune system has the same role: to fight off intruders and allow in what's nurturing. Repressing anger suppresses the immune system, which has been demonstrated in the laboratory. This reduces the defense against malignancy because the immune system is supposed to recognize and destroy malignant transformations. When healthy anger is repressed due to programming or abuse, the immune system turns against the body or cannot fight off malignancy. The physiology is straightforward, but most physicians are unaware of it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Scientifically speaking, I'll tell you a secret that most physicians never hear about despite decades of research and thousands of research papers and elegant science. The mind and the body are not separable. What happens in the mind happens in the body and vice versa. They're one unit. In fact, one great researcher, Candice Perritt, called it body mind. It's a one unit. So our emotional system is part and parcel of the same apparatus as governs our immune system and our nervous system and our hormonal apparatus. It's all one system. It's not separate. They they're different manifestations of the same system. Now what is the role of a healthy anger? Like we've already talked about, it's to protect your boundaries. What is the role of emotions in general? It's to let in what's healthy and nurturing and welcome and to keep up what is not. Is that clear enough? Is that Mhmm. Okay. What is the role of the immune system? Fight off intruders. And to let in what's nurturing and healthy. When you take vitamins, you don't want your and your supplements, you don't want your immune system attacking that. Right. So it's to let in what's nurturing and healthy, keep up what is dangerous and toxic. The immune system and the emotional system have the same role. Because they're one unit, when you repress anger, you're also suppressing your immune system. That's been demonstrated in the laboratory. Now when you do that, your defense against malignancy goes down because your immune system immune system is supposed to recognize the malignant transformation, which happens in our bodies all the time, by the way. It's an accident of nature, but a healthy immune system will say, that's that's a foreigner. That cell, I'm gonna destroy it. Right. When you repress healthy anger because you're programmed to do so because some parenting expert told your parents that an angry child should be banished from your presence or because the child was abused and to survive the abuse, they had to repress their healthy self defense. They also suppress then they learn to suppress their anger all their lives. That represses the immune system. Now the immune system turns against you or it cannot fight off malignancy. The the physiology is straightforward. It's elegant. It's been worked out. Most physicians never hear this.

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

Dr. Maté has criticized modern medicine in several key ways: • Mind-body separation • Overprescription of drugs • Prioritization of profits over science • Ignoring trauma as the root cause of disease • Neglecting social and environmental stressors

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

2. A toxic culture. Maté argues that mental health "problems" are the result of a toxic culture. They are not your fault. What we consider "normal" in our culture is often unhealthy and contributes to physical and mental health issues on a mass scale. https://t.co/fYfpbPzXs4

Video Transcript AI Summary
When microorganisms in a lab culture broth are dying or not thriving, it's called a toxic culture. Similarly, society can be seen as a culture. The increasing rates of sickness, addiction, mental illness, and overdose deaths suggest our society is a toxic culture, one that doesn't support healthy human growth. There's a significant gap between this understanding and how we treat people in medicine. The issue isn't with the science itself, but rather the failure to implement the science into practice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we are studying microorganisms in a laboratory, we grow them in a broth. We give them a broth to nourish them. We call that a culture, a culture medium. And if the organisms in this culture medium, this culture broth, were dying off in great numbers or not thriving or ill, we would call that a toxic culture. In a society like ours, more and more people are getting sick, more addicted, more mentally ill, more people are dying of overdoses. That's also representative of a toxic culture. This culture is not one that supports healthy human growth. But there's such a wide gap between that understanding and the practice of medicine or how we treat people. Oh yeah, there's a huge, what we can call the science and practice gap. So the problem is not with the science. The problem is that we don't put the science into practice.

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

3. Emotional suppression = Disease. Chronic stress and unresolved trauma have been linked to the development of chronic diseases by: • Altering hormone levels • Weakening the immune system • Disrupting normal cell regulation • Creating an internal environment conducive to cancer growth

Video Transcript AI Summary
Modern medicine has lost its way, failing to teach medical students about the mind-body connection. Medical students don't receive lectures on how conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, malignancy, and ALS have been linked to traumatic experiences and emotional patterns that impact physiology. They also don't learn how life experiences alter gene, cell, and chromosome function. The question is posed: why is this information excluded from medical education? One potential reason suggested is that pharmaceutical companies benefit from this lack of knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where did modern medicine lose their way? Because it seems so obvious. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's obvious, and yet the average medical student doesn't hear a single lecture about the Why? What? They don't hear a single lecture about the mind body unity. They don't learn about how rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis and malignancy and ALS and other conditions have all been traced to traumatic experiences and and and certain ways of functioning emotionally which affect our physiology. They just don't learn all this science. It's just astonishing. They don't learn how life experience changes the functioning of your genes and of your cells and of your chromosomes. Right. You know, they don't learn all this stuff. Well, why don't why don't they learn it? Right. Speaker 0: There's gotta be a benefit in some way. Just like addiction would have a benefit. That's why it exists. What's the benefit of not teaching them? Because they're not learning it because it's not being taught. Speaker 1: Well, there's certainly a benefit to the pharmaceutical companies.

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

4. Mind-Body as a Unified System. Gabor Maté advocates for an integrated approach. He recognizes that mental and emotional well-being is inseparable from physical health. He draws on research in neuroscience, psychology, and immunology to argue that thoughts and emotions directly influence biological processes. [ for further study ↓ ]

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

5. Holistic healing Practices: Maté advocates for deeper forms of therapy such as: • Somatic Experiencing • Compassionate inquiry • Psychedelic-assisted therapy https://t.co/jmiyxJAmRi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Therapists unfamiliar with trauma can address its manifestations, but not the core wound. Deeper therapies include body-based approaches like Somatic Experiencing (Peter Levine) and Sensorimotor Psychotherapy (Pat Ogden). EMDR and Internal Family Systems (IFS, Richard Schwartz) are other options, as is Compassionate Inquiry. Lawrence Heller's work is also relevant. Seek a trauma-informed therapist who will address core wounds, not just behavioral symptoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Believe me. I know this. They just don't know much about or anything about trauma. Then they can't help you with the fundamental wound that you're carrying. They can help you with the manifestations, and that's not that's not useless. But they can't help you heal at your core. So then there are therapies that are deeper than that. There is, body based therapies such as somatic experiencing developed by my friend and teacher, Peter Doctor. Peter Levine. There's sensorimotor psychotherapy developed by Pat Ogden. There's EMDR that works for some people. There's internal family systems or IFS developed by my friend and colleague, Doctor. Richard Schwartz. This compassionate inquiry, which is based on my work, and I train therapists in that method. There are others, other names I could mention. There's Larry Heller, Lawrence Heller, and his work and his students. So what you have to look for is somebody who's trauma informed and is willing to work with you not just on your behaviors, but on your core wounds of which the behaviors are symptoms.

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

6. Emotions as medicine. The human nervous system is designed to heal itself. Even after years of trauma and stress healing is still possible. Mate believes healing starts with compassion, it causes the nervous system to relax and promotes beneficial healing chemicals. https://t.co/w26miBVdQo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trauma is not the event itself, but the internal wound resulting from the event. If trauma were the event, such as abuse or loss, it would be unchangeable. However, because trauma is an internal psychological wound with physical manifestations, it can be healed at any time. Recognizing trauma as an internal wound is the key to healing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trauma, again, is not what happened to you. It's what happened inside you as a result of what happened to you, and that's the good news. Because if trauma was what happened to you, that somebody sexually abused you or that your parents died in a war, If that was the trauma, there's nothing you can do to change that. That happened. It was never not gonna have happened. But if the trauma is the wound that you incurred in inwardly, you can heal that wound at any time. So that actually, recognizing what trauma is as an internal psychological wound with manifestations in your body actually allows you to heal it.

@TheSelfLab - The Self Lab 📚

We all have old wounds that fester if we don't take the time to heal. Understanding the mind-body connection will help you unlock the healing mechanism within. Healing is more available than ever before...

Saved - August 30, 2025 at 9:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express deep concern about the influence of transgender ideology on children, arguing it lacks scientific basis and is driven by profit motives. I believe children are being exposed to these ideas prematurely, often leading to irreversible medical interventions that can harm their development and mental health. Many children who experience gender confusion may outgrow these feelings, yet they are being pushed into life-altering decisions. I highlight the risks associated with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, and the troubling reality that parents can face consequences for resisting this ideology.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Children Are Being Preyed Upon...Transgender Ideology Is Based In Fraud." Dr Sheila Furey, Child Psychiatrist "It Isn't Medical Based. It Isn't Scientifically Based. It's A Trillion Dollar Industry That seeks To Fast Track Transgender Drugs & Surgery Onto Our Most Vulnerable." Ideas being pushed on kids today didn’t come from biology — they came from adults with agendas. A child doesn’t suddenly believe they’re in the “wrong body” without someone planting that idea. Once they repeat it out loud, there’s a whole system ready with pills, blockers & surgeries — and big money behind it. Blocking healthy development isn’t health care. It’s a pipeline. And children deserve better. Well before a child learns the difference between adjectives & verbs, activists in many government schools are teaching their pre-K students lessons on transgender pronouns—pronouns like ‘ze’ and ‘zir.’ Public libraries host ‘drag queen story time’ for children of all ages. Teachers are sharing their own intimate sexual encounter stories & openly dressing as the opposite sex in front of their students. It is dangerous & destructive to coerce & push children, whose minds are still developing, to make such life-altering decisions at such young ages – especially since 90% of children who experience gender confusion, no longer hold that view by the time they are 18...if loved & allowed to develop on their own without medical interventions. Many gender-confused children also suffer from mental health issues. Children who identify as transgender are up to 13 times more likely to have ADHD, depression or anxiety than non-transgender children. A study out of the United Kingdom found that 35% of the children who received gender treatment had moderate or severe autism. Many European countries have restricted the use of hormone treatments & surgeries on children. Most notably, the United Kingdom’s National Health Service shut down its transgender youth treatment center, the Tavistock Clinic, after an investigation revealed that the clinic had put young people “at considerable risk” of long-term mental distress. Activists push parents to give their children “gender-affirming care,” including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones & surgeries. Often with the threat & coercion statement...if you don't, you will have a dead son/daughter. These drugs and surgeries can inflict irreparable harm on children. Puberty blockers are hormone-based injections or implants given to children as young as 8 years old to delay the onset of puberty. Gonadotropin, the hormone used in puberty blockers, is the same hormone used to chemically castrate sex offenders. It can leave children with diminished bone density and harm their future fertility. Activists claim that “gender affirming care” improves the mental health of children with gender confusion. However, a study in the American Journal of Psychiatry found that there is no reduction in mental health issues following hormone treatments or sex-reassignment surgeries. Cross-sex hormones begin to transition children to appear more like the other gender. Boys take estrogen, which can cause infertility, blood clots & heart problems. Girls take testosterone, which can also cause infertility, male-pattern baldness & high blood pressure. Adults have given cross-sex hormones to children as young as 13 years old. Sex-reassignment surgeries, including mastectomies, phalloplasty & vaginoplasty are irreversible. They can result in infertility & loss of sexual function. Activists have advocated for 15-year-old girls to access double mastectomies & 17-year-old boys to receive vaginoplasties. American parents have struggled to protect their children from these radical procedures. Parents in some states can lose custody of their children for refusing to abide by the transgender ideology. In Oregon, children as young as 15 years old can receive Medicaid-funded hormone treatments without their parents’ consent. 👇Sexualization Of Children Destroys Lives👇 https://thenewamerican.com/video/dr-sheila-furey-sexualization-of-children-destroys-lives-morality-and-america/ 👇A Psychiatrist Perspective On Transgenderism👇 https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/the-feds1/episodes/47--Dr--Sheila-Furey-A-Psychiatrists-Perspective-on-Covid-and-Transgenderism-e2m4vui/a-abehvk8 👇Evidence Over Ideology👇 https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2024/09/96005/ Speaker: Dr Sheila Furey, MD Video: @Wellness_Radar

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Transgendered ideology, it's based in fraud." "We are born or we are conceived either a girl or a boy from eternity." "We are not plethora of unending gender choices." "So the whole concept that this is free choice is absolutely a lie." "Right? It isn't medical based. It isn't scientifically based." "And then we to further add insult to injury, we wanna recommend immediately that they go into a pipeline of drugs." "Children are being preyed upon, and they're being preyed upon by those who want to make them a part or a symbol of this movement, this religious cult."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Transgendered ideology, it's based in fraud. We are born or we are conceived either a girl or a boy from eternity. All. Since the beginning of man, we are male and we are female. Yes. We are not plethora of unending gender choices. One of the things is is the the psychiatrist, psychologist, social worker who's ever doing this implanting their own thoughts in a child, if they come out of an office and say, I'm now transgender, well, how did that thought come about if they never had that thought before? So if you push an agenda, you can manipulate these children into having thoughts and feelings that were never present there in the first place. There are many underlying things that can affect and make a child or an adult vulnerable to a community that is really preying upon them. So the whole concept that this is free choice is absolutely a lie. Children are being preyed upon, and they're being preyed upon by those who want to make them a part or a symbol of this movement, this religious cult. Right? It isn't medical based. It isn't scientifically based. And then we to further add insult to injury, we wanna recommend immediately that they go into a pipeline of drugs.
Dr. Sheila Furey: Sexualization of Children Destroys Lives, Morality and America The effects of exposure to sexual content on children are severely detrimental. This exposure often leads to various psychological issues, such as anxiety, depression, self-injurious behavior, and premature sexualization. There are instances where children as young as eight develop addictions to pornography and self-stimulation, which result in neurological changes that impede their cognitive and intellectual ... thenewamerican.com
47. Dr. Sheila Furey: A Psychiatrist’s Perspective on Covid and Transgenderism  by The Feds 47. Dr. Sheila Furey: A Psychiatrist’s Perspective on Covid and Transgenderism  Psychiatrist Dr. Sheila Furey, co-founder of the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance, joins The Feds this week to speak about the transgender push within our country. She gives insight into the narratives the medical system fed her before and during Covid and tells of the resulting physical and moral injury on children. She provides thoughts and words for speaking with children about transgenderism. Dr. Furey warns of the current school system’s policies that block parents from being notified of the medical and emotional treatments given to their children while in school.  Dr. Sheila Furey is a graduate of Creighton University School of Medicine. She completed her residency in psychiatry and fellowship in Child Psychiatry at Boston University Hospitals. Dr. Furey has been in clinical practice for over 25 years and has treated adults and children in hospital and outpatient settings, juvenile detention, and residential treatment centers for children. She specializes in working with children and adults with learning challenges or neurologic injuries. Dr. Furey currently maintains a private practice and believes in a treatment approach based on limiting toxic exposures from medications, vaccines, food, and the environment. She believes in the sacredness of the family and the need to protect children from societal assaults on their innocence.  In 2021, in the midst of Covid, she gathered with other healthcare providers and concerned citizens to form the Virginia Medical Freedom Alliance.  This organization seeks to restore the right to medical freedom by ensuring informed consent, bodily sovereignty, and the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship. Check out the VAMFA, whether you’re a Virginian or not- excellent material here: https://vamfa.org VAMFA Rumble Channel: https://rumble.com/c/VAMFA Watch and listen to The Feds on any of these platforms:  https://taplink.cc/fedsforfreedom Support the Work and Become a Member of Feds For Freedom www.fedsforfreedom.org/join Follow Us on Social Media Instagram/X (Twitter)/Facebook:  @feds4freedomusa creators.spotify.com
Evidence over Ideology: Gender-Distressed Children Deserve Nothing Less When it comes to children’s health, ideology should never override evidence. Children who are distressed about their biological sex need evidence-based care that facilitates their journey to adulthood, keeping them mentally and physically intact. thepublicdiscourse.com
View Full Interactive Feed