reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@RonK3l - Ronald Kelly
if the election results go the Democrats way, the voting machines are the best ones we’ve ever had! And if they lose, the voting machines are terrible and could be hacked by Russians! Watch👇
Video Transcript AI Summary
After the 2016 election, Democrats claimed there was a problem with vote machines, but after the 2020 election, they said there was no problem. In previous elections, Democrats challenged results too. In 2001, Maxine Waters challenged George W. Bush's victory, and in 2005, Barbara Boxer challenged Ohio's electoral vote. In 2017, after Trump's win, Sheila Jackson Lee mentioned voting machine malfunctions. These objections were seen as naive or shameless, as they could disenfranchise Americans. Stacey Abrams, a Democrat who ran for governor of Georgia, claimed the game was rigged against voters. The claims of fraudulent votes, malfunctioning machines, and rigged elections are similar to what is being claimed now. Some defend the Dominion voting machines, while others acknowledge vulnerabilities to foreign interference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So after the 2016 election, the democrats said there's a problem with vote machines. After the 2020 election, there's no problem with vote machines. What an amazing miracle. After republican victories in 20,021,004, and twenty sixteen, democrats in congress used the formal counting of electoral votes as an opportunity to challenge election results.
Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Iowa, wrote in a New York Times opinion piece in 2021. 6th, in January 2001, representative Maxine Waters joined several other democrats challenging George w Bush's victory claiming Florida's electoral votes were fraudulent. In January 2005, after Bush's reelection, six senator Barbara Boxer had formally challenged Ohio's electoral vote even though Bush won Ohio by more than 118,000 votes. Wait. Let's recount that because what they've done is that 6, 118,000 votes could have been done by a little cyber Lego hacker that gets in the machine.
Did you see The Lego Movie? They bastards. In January 2017, after Trump's 63, representative Sheila Jackson Lee said there was the malfunction of 87 voting machines, and representative Jim McCove in democrat Massachusetts said there were confirmed and illegal activities engaged by the government of Russia in the 2016 election, then as now, each member of congress was within their rights to make an objection, Mueller wrote, but the objections were naive at best, six, shameless at worst. Either way, the readiness of members of congress to disenfranchise millions of Americans was disconcerting. And now there's Stacey Abrams, the democrat who ran for governor of Georgia who claims that 6, Brian Kemp, the Republican who beat her 4 years ago, won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.
Fraudulent electoral votes, six malfunctioning voting machines, rigged elections. Sound familiar? Oh, yeah. It does, actually. It sounds like exactly what's being claimed right now.
How is it different? If the election results go their way, these
Speaker 1: are some of the best electoral machines sixteen, we have ever how dare you criticize those these Dominion voting machines been like a brother to you. How dare you criticize it? You lost the election, you little cyberbics, you little Russian racist six Shut
Speaker 2: up, fuck. I sit on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Senate Homeland Security Committee, and we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national six security. We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections.
Speaker 1: Did you
Speaker 0: see that on the road to the White House 2020? So when they're
Speaker 1: on the way to the White House,
Speaker 0: oh my God, we could lose. The voting machines, if we do lose, they are 6 terrible voting machines, they could be hacked by, you know, a Russian. When they're hacked with snow in their boots
Speaker 1: with cancer, like Putin bested, son of bitches, you've won the election. Those are some of the best 6 voting machines, look at this little guy. I love it. What a reliable voting machine. How can I stay mad at you?
@ShotGun_Bonnie - ShotGunBonnie
Just a little reminder — listen as Joe Biden brags about having “the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have created a comprehensive voter fraud organization, which is the most extensive and inclusive in American political history. This was done by our administration, as well as the previous administration under President Obama.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Secondly, we're in a situation where we have put together and you guys did it for our administration, the President Obama's administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.
@Destiny15_FL - Destiny
Everything Democrats do is RIGGED. Democrats are RIGGERS!!!!
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2008, Barack Obama acknowledged that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. He stated that those in power tend to tilt things in their favor. This raises questions about election interference. Obama's remarks suggest that Democrats have also been involved. It's important to connect the dots and consider the implications. What are your thoughts?
@TONYxTWO - TONY™️
WOW!!! MUST WATCH!! Did you know in 2008, Barack Obama was asked about rigged and stolen elections and his responses were … “We’ll it helps in Ohio that we have Democrats in charge of the machines.” “It’s not just Republicans who have monkey’d around with elections in the past, sometimes Democrats have too.” “Whenever people are in power, they have this tendency to try to tilt things in their direction.” How do you listen to this and not connect the dots? I believe it’s abundantly clear that Obama was actually being honest here and admitted to Democrats being involved in Election Interference. Do you agree?? Thoughts?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks for reassurance that the upcoming election won't be rigged or stolen. Speaker 1 responds by mentioning that having Democrats in charge of the voting machines in Ohio is helpful. However, they also acknowledge that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. Speaker 1 explains that those in power tend to try to tilt things in their favor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would just like to know what you can say to reassure us that this election will not be rigged or stolen.
Speaker 1: Well, well, I tell you what, it it helps in Ohio that we got, democrats in charge of the machines. But but look, I come from Chicago, so so I wanna be honest. It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past, sometimes Democrats have to. You know, whenever people are in power, they're Yeah. They have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
reSee.it AI Summary
A Democrat County Supervisor challenges primary election results in Hinds, Mississippi, citing massive fraud. Videotapes reveal individuals inserting thumb drives and ballots into machines. The Hinds County Democrat party chair is implicated. Similarities to 2020 and 2022 elections in Arizona raise concerns about broader election rigging. Kari Lake and realDonaldTrump are not alone; Democrats allegedly rig elections nationwide.
@BehizyTweets - George
BREAKING: A Democrat County Supervisor in Hinds, Mississippi is challenging his party's primary election results after discovering massive election fraud "We have videotapes of someone going into boxes bringing in thumb drives, bringing in ballots to be inserted into the machines" The person he's talking about is the Hinds County Democrat party chair. If you watch this presentation, it sounds exactly like what happened in the 2020 election and 2022 election in Arizona. If Democrats are rigging their own primaries, imagine what they're doing in general elections. @KariLake @realDonaldTrump are not alone. Democrats are rigging elections everywhere
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Jackie Amos, the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party, of tampering with the elections. They provide evidence of Amos' involvement in fraud and corruption, including video footage and pictures. Another speaker discusses the lack of proper documentation and procedures in the voting process, such as missing machine tapes, media sticks, voter signature books, and ballot accounting forms. They also mention the mishandling of materials and the failure of ES&S, the voting machine company, to provide digital imaging. The speaker calls for immediate action and urges the filing of criminal charges against those involved. They emphasize the need for fair and honest elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hines County Democratic Party have a chairperson by the name of Jackie Amos. We book we believe and we have evidence that Jackie Amos is tampering with the Hinds County elections. I provided each of you with a copy of the information In her, conspiracy and correspondence to someone concerning My election on August 8th. I cannot read all and everything that she said on this, Paper, because some of it, the words are not fit to use. She correspond with an individual.
That individual call the chairperson, Jackie Amos, or texted chairperson, Jackie Amos, and stated, hey, Don't let them keep their prediction out of her election. She won fair and square. Jackie Amos respond to that text was that she won. But I'm going to f David Archie on the site. This matter came from the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party.
And so on today, we asking that the Hinds County Democratic Party take immediate Action. We're asking that she step down from her position as high end county chairperson of the Democratic Party, Along with Sandra McCall, who is the secretary, who is her running buddy in and around this election, We have videotape of Jackie Amos going into boxes, bringing in thumb drives, Bringing in, ballots to be inserted into machines, we have pictures of Jackie Amos participating in what we think that is fraud as well as corruption. And so We wanna be absolutely clear that this matter is not only with the Hinds County Democratic Party, but this matter is With every citizen in the state of Mississippi, this is the opportunity to stop corruption and to stop fraud when it comes to elections in the state of Mississippi.
Speaker 1: Three components To verify the vote, the first thing is the paper ballot. I stand before you to to say 26 out of 26 Preceipts contain the paper ballot. 26, component 1. Component number 2 are the machine tapes. The machine tapes is a count of every voter that went and used that machine.
I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts did not did not include the tapes. Don't worry. There's a third component. There is something called a mediastick. It is the brains of the machine.
Some of you may call it a thumb drive or something. I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts Did not include the media sticks in the ballot box. So already, you know, I'm setting A tone. There's a theme here. There's a theme.
But the d s two hundred offers an additional measure that they don't mention a lot, but it's there. It's called digital imagery, which is a picture of every ballot. Not one. Not one. Now that would not have been for the Democratic Party to put in, but that was a request we made to e s and s, and we'll discuss them later.
But they should have been a 40 to us, not 1 digital image. So that whole process of DS 200 being able to tell us what the actual vote vote was went out the window. We only receive paper ballots. Then we have don't worry. I'm just gonna put it out there in the open.
There's another mechanism. Each of us, we're familiar. We show our ID. We walk in the poll, show the ID. We sign a book.
It's called the voter register. We call it the signature book. And sometimes if we're counting trying to work as a poll watcher, you'll say, tell me what line you were on so we are low the number Of the vote? 26. I stand corrected.
20. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include that voter signature book. 20 out of 26 did not include the voter signature. Hold on. All hope is not lost yet.
There is something That's called the ballot accounting form. I call it the 10 40. Line 1 says how many Ballots did you get? How many did you use? How many was affidavit and how many was for?
And you add and subtract. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include the ballot accounting form. There again, we don't know how many votes took place because all we have are the paper ballots. Bear with me. We have absentee ballots.
26 out of 26 precincts, There were no absentee ballots in those boxes. I'm going to explain that. There were no absentee ballots In those boxes out of 26 precincts. But we are creatures of habit Because there were some affidavits. And guess what the number is?
26 Out of 26 voting precincts did not have affidavits in the ballot box. 26 out of 26 voting precincts, my favorite two words, did not Did not contain the express ballot. Now as it relates to comminly, This is their elect in duty. That's a blatant violation disrespect of your work. We found in district 2 material that belonged to district 1 And district 3 and district 5, all in the ballot box, that is district 2.
That is just a total blatant disrespect, lazy, for a lack of a better word, Just irresponsible. And not only did I find that, I found it on 3 occasions, commingling Of district. I didn't say his other precinct. Someone else's district material are in these boxes. If that didn't wasn't enough to rattle you, I found a document dated 2022 For a runoff election in 2022, these women and men Broke shame to our electoral process.
As it relates to the integrity of the ballot, 26 out of 26th precinct ballot boxes were not sealed properly. They were not affixed over the lock. They did not board when we removed them. Not one still aborted. People have free will to go in and out of those boxes.
Let's talk about the seal logs. 20 out of 26 offered a seal log. And even 2 of them mentioned That at the opening of the poll, there were no seals. Mister Archie already shared that the Democratic committee, the executive committee, did not come. They didn't have to, but you would think this is their election.
Often time, you see them present. But Mister Zach, mister Zach Wallace, a Hinds County circuit clerk, he attended 4 days out of 6. The other 2 days he sent us a mister Wells. Now I wanna share the media sticks. On Wednesday of last week, 1st day of the review, I say to mister Zach, Where are the media sticks?
Listen close. It's recorded. Mister Zach says to us, I do not know where the media sticks are, miss Walker. I said, do you recognize those, the brains? Miss Walker, I do not know where the sticks are.
That's on Wednesday. I then asked him on Thursday morning, Where are the media sticks? He said, miss Walker, I do not know where the media sticks are. I said, could you at least try to find out, mister Zack? I need the media fixed.
On Friday morning, I asked mister Zach, where are the media sticks? I don't know, miss Walker. I said, please try to find the media Sticks. We did late lunch. When we returned, I said you got some sticks, mister Zack.
Not yet, miss Walker, but I'm working on it. I stand before you to tell you that about 2:30 on Friday afternoon, Mister Zack located the media sticks. No, sir. No, ma'am. They were not in the vault At his office locked up.
They were here in this building with election commissioner mister Clark. Mister Clark said to me I asked him, when did you get them? I'm not sure of the date that I received it. Who did you get them from? Who gave them to you?
He did not answer that question. He advises me that he has the right to be involved with this election. The law does not dictate That he's the custodial person of anything. Those items are to be locked in mister Zack's vault. They in in addition to that, those numbers were not even in a sealed Locked bag.
It was a red canvas bag with no lock. To make matters worse, they were all commingled. It was well over a100. The law does not allow me to handle materials outside of the precinct that I'm representing. To make matters even worse, mister Clark had the audacity To walk back to his office and keep the media at 6.
He never turned them over to mister Zach. He never in our presence turned those sticks over to mister Zach. So before you leave, Check with mister Clark. He still may have them in his possession. These are outside of the statues, not not thus says Cynthia Walker, But thus says the law of Mississippi, not only did that happen When I talked to mister Zach about the affidavit, Every day I spoke to mister Zach about the affidavit.
And every day, mister Zach told me, miss Walker, I don't know where they are. I don't know where they are, miss Walker. The ballot that had been voted and counted for affidavits. Didn't know where they were. In the matter of the absentee ballots that should have been our buck, mister Zach did tell me they were under lock and key at his office.
Mister Zach received notice that we were coming here for a review. Those ballots should have been brought here. And when I asked him why did they not bring the absentee ballots to this location. He said, first of all, miss Walker, it's 2 boxes. They're in a paper they're in 2 paper boxes, and they're co mingled.
And it's nearly 1800 of them. You, miss Walker, will have to decide which one belong to, mister mister Archie. That's not what the law says. That's not my that does not fall within the scope of my responsibility. When I tell you the Democratic Hinds County executive committee failed their constituents.
I pray that mister Archie will take these notes. I pray I challenge you all to take them. As each one of these election commissioners, don't I know what I'm talking about? I challenge you all to go up there And called Kyle Kirkpatrick. Kyle Kirkpatrick.
Kirk, k I r k. Kirkpatrick at the secretary of state's office. And I will tell you that he's going to tell you these are felony infractions. No one has the right to remove Valid information from these boxes. All of this all of this, I will not leave this podium without mentioning e, s, and s because that's the question y'all have.
I can read your mind. Before the review, mister Zach notified mister Archie and his opponent That e s ES and S had been notified. They agreed to come to the ballot box review. But when we arrived on Wednesday, we received that they were going to be available by phone. They were not providing those digital imaging.
That was Wednesday. On Friday, I called them When we located the media sticks, spoke to a man named mister Ken Williams. And mister Ken said, my question was, we found 1 tape. But why does it say August 28th? And we are working on August 8.
Mister Ken tells me he cannot answer that question. Mister Ken did agree To come the next morning for the ballot box review. You know the answer. Mind read me. Mister Ken and no other representative From ES and S has presented themselves for this ballot box review.
When I told you that we are detailed and we are my prodigal, I want Hinds County to know. I'm from a county that had their own problems. And I stand, and I'm fighting theirs as well. But I also want us to know, all of the materials We're withheld from this review process because it's my professional opinion. My professional position because I've done nearly 40 ballot box reviews.
And never n e v e r have I seen such a poor representation A ballot boxes. Never been almost 40 reviews. And I've been doing this 50 plus years. These materials were withheld because they knew full well. They knew that Jackie Amos' and Tony Johnson, whoever has influence, they knew full well But there was no balancing in those paper ballots.
They dictated the number of paper ballots And they gave us nothing to support it. Not one, nothing to support. But the law says they should. The law says they should. The law says they should.
The executive committee decision to withhold these voting documents denied supervisor David Archer His absolute right to verify the true vote. But even more even more, You disrespected the constituents of Heinz too. That's right. We will not know the will by the voter. You have no one has the right to think that they can operate elections.
The Burger King See, have it your way. It's out in the open today. It's out in the open. There will be nothing else to hide because I'm not like others. Baby, I know this stuff.
Take it to the bank. I know it. I attend the secretary of state's training. I've done enough ballot box reviews I can close my eyes. I walk.
I talk a lot, but I walk the talk. I know when fraud is amongst us. I know when you have 1, you oftentimes have 1 or 2 boxes that's astray. But when 26 boxes is compromised, There is growth misconduct. There's radical departure from the election law.
I challenge you news investigators. Ask one of the commissioners. Call Kyle. Verify. Confirm me.
And I tell you every item that I have listed is against Mississippi statute. Their negative behavior impeded his right. And I'm encouraging let's put it out in the open. I'm encouraging mister Archie To leave here because Yahweh can invite y'all. Follow me.
To leave here and file Criminal charges against Tony, against Jackie Amos who's gonna say Totally is her coconspirator. I stand before you right now. I stand before you right now to say This is an illegal process. This man is due. This man is due.
This man is due his reelection. The constituents are due. He's not acting for anything outside, what is absolutely dictated by law. And anyone that gets offended, I told them that the other day. There was a heated exchange.
If somebody's angry, Take it up with the Democratic Party, the executive committee. They're the ones that did the poop work, not us. I'm just the examiner. I am Cynthia Johnson Walker. I stand on this message, And I approve this message that starting today, we're gonna have a new way, a honest, fair Way of election.
Because if not, I'm calling you out. And I call you out free. This is Enough already. I thank you for your time. If you need a copy of my notes, I'm sure mister Archer will say we can give them.
And I pray that you all, the investigators that you are, take this story and verify If it's waiting, if it's truthful. Thank you again for your time.
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats admit rigging primaries in 2016 and now face allegations of election fraud in Hinds County, MS. Video evidence shows the Democrat Chair tampering with ballots. If they cheat their own, imagine the general elections. Media remains uninterested. ELECTION FORTIFICATION concerns arise.
@amuse - @amuse
ELECTION FORTIFICATION: Democrats describe how leaders of their party rigged voting machine to change the outcome of the Democrat primary. Presumably, they would never do this in the general election…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Jackie Amos, the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party, of tampering with the Hinds County elections. They provide evidence of Amos' involvement in fraud and corruption, including videos and pictures. Another speaker discusses the lack of proper documentation and procedures in the election process, such as missing machine tapes, media sticks, voter signature books, and ballot accounting forms. They also mention the mishandling of materials and the failure of ES&S, the voting machine company, to provide digital imaging. The speaker calls for immediate action and urges the filing of criminal charges against those involved. They emphasize the need for fair and honest elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hines County Democratic Party have a chairperson by the name of Jackie Amos. We book we believe and we have evidence that Jackie Amos is tampering with the Hinds County elections. I provided each of you with a copy of the information In her, conspiracy and correspondence to someone concerning My election on August 8th. I cannot read all and everything that she said on this, Paper, because some of it, the words are not fit to use. She correspond with an individual.
That individual call the chairperson, Jackie Amos, or texted chairperson, Jackie Amos, and stated, hey, Don't let them keep their prediction out of her election. She won fair and square. Jackie Amos respond to that text was that she won. But I'm going to f David Archie on the site. This matter came from the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party.
And so on today, we asking that the Hinds County Democratic Party take immediate Action. We're asking that she step down from her position as high end county chairperson of the Democratic Party, Along with Sandra McCall, who is the secretary, who is her running buddy in and around this election, We have videotape of Jackie Amos going into boxes, bringing in thumb drives, Bringing in, ballots to be inserted into machines, we have pictures of Jackie Amos participating in what we think that is fraud as well as corruption. And so We wanna be absolutely clear that this matter is not only with the Hinds County Democratic Party, but this matter is With every citizen in the state of Mississippi, this is the opportunity to stop corruption and to stop fraud when it comes to elections in the state of Mississippi.
Speaker 1: Three components To verify the vote, the first thing is the paper ballot. I stand before you to to say 26 out of 26 Preceipts contain the paper ballot. 26, component 1. Component number 2 are the machine tapes. The machine tapes is a count of every voter that went and used that machine.
I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts did not did not include the tapes. Don't worry. There's a third component. There is something called a mediastick. It is the brains of the machine.
Some of you may call it a thumb drive or something. I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts Did not include the media sticks in the ballot box. So already, you know, I'm setting A tone. There's a theme here. There's a theme.
But the d s two hundred offers an additional measure that they don't mention a lot, but it's there. It's called digital imagery, which is a picture of every ballot. Not one. Not one. Now that would not have been for the Democratic Party to put in, but that was a request we made to e s and s, and we'll discuss them later.
But they should have been a 40 to us, not 1 digital image. So that whole process of DS 200 being able to tell us what the actual vote vote was went out the window. We only receive paper ballots. Then we have don't worry. I'm just gonna put it out there in the open.
There's another mechanism. Each of us, we're familiar. We show our ID. We walk in the poll, show the ID. We sign a book.
It's called the voter register. We call it the signature book. And sometimes if we're counting trying to work as a poll watcher, you'll say, tell me what line you were on so we are low the number Of the vote? 26. I stand corrected.
20. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include that voter signature book. 20 out of 26 did not include the voter signature. Hold on. All hope is not lost yet.
There is something That's called the ballot accounting form. I call it the 10 40. Line 1 says how many Ballots did you get? How many did you use? How many was affidavit and how many was for?
And you add and subtract. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include the ballot accounting form. There again, we don't know how many votes took place because all we have are the paper ballots. Bear with me. We have absentee ballots.
26 out of 26 precincts, There were no absentee ballots in those boxes. I'm going to explain that. There were no absentee ballots In those boxes out of 26 precincts. But we are creatures of habit Because there were some affidavits. And guess what the number is?
26 Out of 26 voting precincts did not have affidavits in the ballot box. 26 out of 26 voting precincts, my favorite two words, did not Did not contain the express ballot. Now as it relates to comminly, This is their elect in duty. That's a blatant violation disrespect of your work. We found in district 2 material that belonged to district 1 And district 3 and district 5, all in the ballot box, that is district 2.
That is just a total blatant disrespect, lazy, for a lack of a better word, Just irresponsible. And not only did I find that, I found it on 3 occasions, commingling Of district. I didn't say his other precinct. Someone else's district material are in these boxes. If that didn't wasn't enough to rattle you, I found a document dated 2022 For a runoff election in 2022, these women and men Broke shame to our electoral process.
As it relates to the integrity of the ballot, 26 out of 26th precinct ballot boxes were not sealed properly. They were not affixed over the lock. They did not board when we removed them. Not one still aborted. People have free will to go in and out of those boxes.
Let's talk about the seal logs. 20 out of 26 offered a seal log. And even 2 of them mentioned That at the opening of the poll, there were no seals. Mister Archie already shared that the Democratic committee, the executive committee, did not come. They didn't have to, but you would think this is their election.
Often time, you see them present. But Mister Zach, mister Zach Wallace, a Hinds County circuit clerk, he attended 4 days out of 6. The other 2 days he sent us a mister Wells. Now I wanna share the media sticks. On Wednesday of last week, 1st day of the review, I say to mister Zach, Where are the media sticks?
Listen close. It's recorded. Mister Zach says to us, I do not know where the media sticks are, miss Walker. I said, do you recognize those, the brains? Miss Walker, I do not know where the sticks are.
That's on Wednesday. I then asked him on Thursday morning, Where are the media sticks? He said, miss Walker, I do not know where the media sticks are. I said, could you at least try to find out, mister Zack? I need the media fixed.
On Friday morning, I asked mister Zach, where are the media sticks? I don't know, miss Walker. I said, please try to find the media Sticks. We did late lunch. When we returned, I said you got some sticks, mister Zack.
Not yet, miss Walker, but I'm working on it. I stand before you to tell you that about 2:30 on Friday afternoon, Mister Zack located the media sticks. No, sir. No, ma'am. They were not in the vault At his office locked up.
They were here in this building with election commissioner mister Clark. Mister Clark said to me I asked him, when did you get them? I'm not sure of the date that I received it. Who did you get them from? Who gave them to you?
He did not answer that question. He advises me that he has the right to be involved with this election. The law does not dictate That he's the custodial person of anything. Those items are to be locked in mister Zack's vault. They in in addition to that, those numbers were not even in a sealed Locked bag.
It was a red canvas bag with no lock. To make matters worse, they were all commingled. It was well over a100. The law does not allow me to handle materials outside of the precinct that I'm representing. To make matters even worse, mister Clark had the audacity To walk back to his office and keep the media at 6.
He never turned them over to mister Zach. He never in our presence turned those sticks over to mister Zach. So before you leave, Check with mister Clark. He still may have them in his possession. These are outside of the statues, not not thus says Cynthia Walker, But thus says the law of Mississippi, not only did that happen When I talked to mister Zach about the affidavit, Every day I spoke to mister Zach about the affidavit.
And every day, mister Zach told me, miss Walker, I don't know where they are. I don't know where they are, miss Walker. The ballot that had been voted and counted for affidavits. Didn't know where they were. In the matter of the absentee ballots that should have been our buck, mister Zach did tell me they were under lock and key at his office.
Mister Zach received notice that we were coming here for a review. Those ballots should have been brought here. And when I asked him why did they not bring the absentee ballots to this location. He said, first of all, miss Walker, it's 2 boxes. They're in a paper they're in 2 paper boxes, and they're co mingled.
And it's nearly 1800 of them. You, miss Walker, will have to decide which one belong to, mister mister Archie. That's not what the law says. That's not my that does not fall within the scope of my responsibility. When I tell you the Democratic Hinds County executive committee failed their constituents.
I pray that mister Archie will take these notes. I pray I challenge you all to take them. As each one of these election commissioners, don't I know what I'm talking about? I challenge you all to go up there And called Kyle Kirkpatrick. Kyle Kirkpatrick.
Kirk, k I r k. Kirkpatrick at the secretary of state's office. And I will tell you that he's going to tell you these are felony infractions. No one has the right to remove Valid information from these boxes. All of this all of this, I will not leave this podium without mentioning e, s, and s because that's the question y'all have.
I can read your mind. Before the review, mister Zach notified mister Archie and his opponent That e s ES and S had been notified. They agreed to come to the ballot box review. But when we arrived on Wednesday, we received that they were going to be available by phone. They were not providing those digital imaging.
That was Wednesday. On Friday, I called them When we located the media sticks, spoke to a man named mister Ken Williams. And mister Ken said, my question was, we found 1 tape. But why does it say August 28th? And we are working on August 8.
Mister Ken tells me he cannot answer that question. Mister Ken did agree To come the next morning for the ballot box review. You know the answer. Mind read me. Mister Ken and no other representative From ES and S has presented themselves for this ballot box review.
When I told you that we are detailed and we are my prodigal, I want Hinds County to know. I'm from a county that had their own problems. And I stand, and I'm fighting theirs as well. But I also want us to know, all of the materials We're withheld from this review process because it's my professional opinion. My professional position because I've done nearly 40 ballot box reviews.
And never n e v e r have I seen such a poor representation A ballot boxes. Never been almost 40 reviews. And I've been doing this 50 plus years. These materials were withheld because they knew full well. They knew that Jackie Amos' and Tony Johnson, whoever has influence, they knew full well But there was no balancing in those paper ballots.
They dictated the number of paper ballots And they gave us nothing to support it. Not one, nothing to support. But the law says they should. The law says they should. The law says they should.
The executive committee decision to withhold these voting documents denied supervisor David Archer His absolute right to verify the true vote. But even more even more, You disrespected the constituents of Heinz too. That's right. We will not know the will by the voter. You have no one has the right to think that they can operate elections.
The Burger King See, have it your way. It's out in the open today. It's out in the open. There will be nothing else to hide because I'm not like others. Baby, I know this stuff.
Take it to the bank. I know it. I attend the secretary of state's training. I've done enough ballot box reviews I can close my eyes. I walk.
I talk a lot, but I walk the talk. I know when fraud is amongst us. I know when you have 1, you oftentimes have 1 or 2 boxes that's astray. But when 26 boxes is compromised, There is growth misconduct. There's radical departure from the election law.
I challenge you news investigators. Ask one of the commissioners. Call Kyle. Verify. Confirm me.
And I tell you every item that I have listed is against Mississippi statute. Their negative behavior impeded his right. And I'm encouraging let's put it out in the open. I'm encouraging mister Archie To leave here because Yahweh can invite y'all. Follow me.
To leave here and file Criminal charges against Tony, against Jackie Amos who's gonna say Totally is her coconspirator. I stand before you right now. I stand before you right now to say This is an illegal process. This man is due. This man is due.
This man is due his reelection. The constituents are due. He's not acting for anything outside, what is absolutely dictated by law. And anyone that gets offended, I told them that the other day. There was a heated exchange.
If somebody's angry, Take it up with the Democratic Party, the executive committee. They're the ones that did the poop work, not us. I'm just the examiner. I am Cynthia Johnson Walker. I stand on this message, And I approve this message that starting today, we're gonna have a new way, a honest, fair Way of election.
Because if not, I'm calling you out. And I call you out free. This is Enough already. I thank you for your time. If you need a copy of my notes, I'm sure mister Archer will say we can give them.
And I pray that you all, the investigators that you are, take this story and verify If it's waiting, if it's truthful. Thank you again for your time.
@amuse - @amuse
Democrat County Supervisor in Hinds, MS questions his own party's primary due to election fraud. "We have videotapes of someone—none other than the Hinds County Democrat Chair—tampering with ballots." Echoes of Arizona 2020 and 2022. If they cheat their own, imagine the general elections. https://www.wapt.com/article/hinds-county-supervisor-david-archie-challenging-results-calls-for-new-election/44954073
Hinds County supervisor continues to claim corruption after election loss
Hinds County District 2 Supervisor David Archie claimed there was a "high-tech election heist with corruption as well as fraud" surrounding the Aug. 8 primary elections.
wapt.com
@amuse - @amuse
OLD NEWS? Democrats come forward and admit their party is rigging primaries again and yet a week later nothing has been done. The media is uninterested. FLASHBACK: Both Senator Warren and DNC Chair Brazile admit the Democrat primary was rigged in 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/02/ex-dnc-chair-goes-at-the-clintons-alleging-hillarys-campaign-hijacked-dnc-during-primary-with-bernie-sanders/
Analysis | Elizabeth Warren and Donna Brazile both now agree the 2016 Democratic primary was rigged
Donna Brazile accuses the Clinton campaign of a hostile takeover of the DNC, confirming the fears of Sanders's supporters.
washingtonpost.com
@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli
Rigged Elections Have Consequences Send this to a democrat: https://t.co/PYRihhS4xc
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a recent 60-minute interview, the speaker expresses strong criticism towards President Joe Biden and his administration. They believe that the administration is corrupt and incompetent, and that Biden is unable to address the issues facing the country. The speaker questions why a disclaimer was placed before the interview and highlights the lack of coherence in Biden's responses. They argue that other countries are not taking the United States seriously, leading to attacks from groups like Hamas. The speaker concludes by suggesting that something catastrophic is imminent and expresses confusion about the current state of affairs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sleepy Joe 60 minute interview was the most preposterous, ridiculous, sadden thing I've ever seen on national television and history. This administration is so terrible and they know it. They know it's so much that they decided to take it upon themselves to put a fucking disclaimer before the interview. Now you might be asking yourself, what did the disclaimer actually say? Well, Long story short, it's sugarco.
This is the old motherfucker that is incompetent, don't know where he's at, don't know how he got there and don't know what the fuck is going on. They pretty much said, bear with this old corrupt motherfucker. Seen this man sit here and try to justify his wrongdoing for the last 3 years. It's fucking ridiculous. I don't care if you're a liberal, Republican, conservative, independent.
I think at this point, we all can agree that this motherfucker and this administration and this government is beyond corrupt. Okay, it can't be no obvious than what the this man had the audacity to sit on TV and say, I can fix it. As if somebody else did this shit. As if somebody else did the inflation or started this war or or or or have all this bullshit that's going on right now as if Trump started it. All this shit happened on your end, sleepy Joe.
When you gonna clean up your mess, you don't get if I rerun for pres no. No. We don't want you to rerun for president. No. Go sit your ass down.
Y'all have to go see this 60 minute interview. Not for the fact of knowledge, but you all have to see this shit to believe it, man. Other countries are laughing at us. That's why Hamas is attacking because They don't they don't they don't see us serious. There's no backbone.
Why? Because this government, this administration has sold us out. It was that simple. This is all over fucking money. This man couldn't even form a co why do you even do an interview if you can't form a coherent sentence?
The interview asked some simple ass question. Don't. Don't. Don't. Don't what?
Give a fucking reasonable answer to why our country is fucked up. At this point, I I genuinely believe the movie 2012 is coming to life. And here's why. I feel like they're building something to jet the fuck out because something catastrophic is about to happen. This shit ain't making sense.
What the hell is going on, man?
@leslibless - 🇺🇸ProudArmyBrat
2020 mules that rigged the election. Dems CHEATED! https://t.co/eC1Vdcr5rH
@Proud1inUSA - American Girl 🇺🇸
See?
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
🚨BREAKING: Voting machines in Pennsylvania shut down after getting caught flipping votes Democrats run that state and will cheat in *any* way possible ENOUGH IS ENOUGH - Get rid of these damn rigged machines!! https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/its-happening-voting-machines-down-several-districts-pennsylvania/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=its-happening-voting-machines-down-several-districts-pennsylvania
It's Happening: Voting Machines Down in Several Districts in Pennsylvania Due to "Votes Getting Flipped" | The Gateway Pundit | by Anthony Scott
Election Day got off to a rough start in several districts in Northampton County, Pennsylvania.
thegatewaypundit.com
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Here is 2 minutes of Democrats revealing their distrust for voting machines. https://t.co/EwzkfsyJnC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. Even with limited knowledge and resources, hackers can breach these machines in minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in different states, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines. Researchers have found serious security flaws in 43% of voting machines used by American voters. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could impact a close election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. For researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering.
Speaker 1: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.
Speaker 2: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another.
Speaker 0: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
Speaker 3: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
Speaker 2: You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are Doing different things, but in fact, 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risks.
Speaker 4: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked.
Speaker 3: Workers were able to easily hack into electronic voting machine.
Speaker 0: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including backdoors.
Speaker 5: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
Speaker 4: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues Here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states.
Speaker 1: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack.
Speaker 3: In a close presentary election, they just need to hack 1 swing state. Or maybe 1 or 2. Or maybe just a few counties in 1 swing stayed.
Speaker 2: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats and election integrity have been a topic of concern. Obama, Kamala, and Biden have made statements about the election process. Time Magazine discusses how Democrats fortified the election. Gateway Pundit presents a police report on fake voter registrations. 2000 Mules provide video evidence of ballot harvesting. Republicans raise concerns about election fraud. DOJ takes action against those suspected of wrongdoing.
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
Obama - “it’s better for us when Democrats control the election counting” Kamala - “election machines can be easily hacked” Biden - “we have the biggest voter fraud organization in history” Time Magazine - here’s how Democrats “fortified” the election Gateway Pundit - here’s a police report showing a Democrat activist filed 10,000+ fake voter registrations in Michigan 2000 Mules - here’s video evidence of people illegally harvesting millions of ballots in swing states Republicans - “hey I think there might be some election fraud here” DOJ - congrats, you’re indicted, disbarred, deplatformed off the internet, and armed FBI agents are rummaging through your wife’s underwear drawer
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
“Any wild allegations of covert efforts to rig elections are simply preposterous. As anyone can clearly see, the steps we are taking to interfere with and rig the outcome of our elections are being done in plain sight. This is a win for democracy."
@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports
Democrats Disprove Claims They Will Covertly Rig Election By Rigging It In Plain Sight https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-disprove-claims-they-will-covertly-rig-election-by-rigging-it-in-plain-sight via @TheBabylonBee
Democrats Disprove Claims They Will Covertly Rig Election By Rigging It In Plain Sight
AUGUSTA, ME — In a move designed to push back against criticism that they have a track record of rigging elections in secret, Democrats have now adopted a policy of rigging elections in broad daylight so everyone in the country can see it.
babylonbee.com
@jessies_now - ♡ 𝓙𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓮 ♡🌿🌷🌿💋😘
Another Democrat is caught for election fraud in Wisconsin! 👇 I can easily see how Trump lost the 2020 election - well-orchestrated fraud when hundreds of thousands ballots, all marked for Biden, were "found" at 4 am in all the battleground states! No doubt, the 2020 election was rigged! 😠
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
You don't need to wait until November to know that the Democrats are cheat*ing in the 2024 election. They are already cheating. Right now. Through campaign finance fra*d. This will blow your mind 🤯 https://t.co/Hcao20vf5O
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video reveals suspicious donation patterns on fec.gov, with unemployed individuals making numerous small donations totaling tens of thousands of dollars to ActBlue and various Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with the Harris campaign sending emails asking for $1 donations using fear tactics. Fake donors were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing the campaign's desperation for small donations to potentially facilitate a larger scam.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In just 10 minutes on fec.gov, they discovered startling donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Now let's take a look at some of these numbers. 4 unemployed individuals donating a staggering $197,993.68 across you ready for this? 23,416 separate donations. That's an average of 10 donations per day every day since January 1, 2023.
Does this sound like genuine grassroots support to you? So let's break it down. These suspicious donations. 1st, we have Carolyn from New Jersey living in an apartment and listed as unemployed. She somehow managed to donate 53,000 over $53,000 through 598 I'm sorry.
5,000 998 separate donations since January 1st 23. The bulk of the donations, 36,000, went directly to ActBlue across over 4,600 transactions. But it doesn't stop there. She also made donations to various Democrat campaigns and PACs including Bob Casey for Senate, Jeffries for Congress, and Nancy Pelosi for Congress. So how does an unemployed person living in an apartment have this kind of money to throw around?
Next, we have Sandra from California. Also, unemployed and living in an average house. She donated $30,000 or just over 30,000 dollars. Ready for this? Across 66,000 almost 6800 donations.
Again, the majority went to ActBlue. Just over $19,000 over 4,870 donations. She also contributed to Rosen for Nevada, HMP, and even Harris for president. That's right folks. Direct donations to Harris' campaign from an unemployed individual.
Then there is Thomas from Wisconsin. His listed address is just a plot of land, yet this unemployed donor managed to give, you ready for this? Just shy of $70,000 through 26 100 donations. A whopping 34, almost 35,000 went to ActBlue in 1600 separate transactions. He also donated to the progressive turnout project, retired Americans pack, and once again, Harris for president.
And then we also have here this is Amy. Meet Amy from Oregon, another unemployed donor who somehow scraped together $42,000 for about 8,000 donations that ActBlue received. Okay? Now they received 29,000 from her across 55100 transactions. She donated to Ameripac, moms fed up, elect democratic women.
Now my friends, these patterns are not just suspicious. They are downright alarming. So how are unemployed individuals making 1,000 of small donations totaling tens of 1,000 of dollars? And why are they spreading these donations across multiple Democrat campaigns and PACs? But it gets worse.
Tony Saruga, another investigator, he found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in just 30 days. Now take a look at some of the emails that were sent by the Harris campaign. They're practically begging for $1, $2, $3 donations, but there's a twist that reveals just how deep the rabbit hole goes. You ready? In this email, you can see right here, They're pushing hard for a measly $3 donation.
They claim it could guarantee Joe and Kamala are reelected and prevent Donald Trump from becoming president again. Yeah. Well here's another one. This time they are down to asking for just a dollar, $1. They're using scare tactics mentioning Trump's far right billionaire donors and a supposed $50,000,000 donation to Trump's Super PAC.
It's clear fear mongering 101. But this last email is where things get really interesting. If you notice the name at the top, f j b. Now you might think that's just a random set of initials, but here's the kicker. The investigators deliberately seeded these initials intact, Blue's database.
That's right, America. Tony Saruga and his team inserted tens of thousands of fake donors into ActBlue lists to track their activities and lo and behold, here's one of the fake names showing up in an official email. This proves beyond a shadow of doubt that the Harris Campaign is using these ActBlue lists for their fundraising efforts. They're sending personalized emails to names that don't even exist. But why are they so desperate for these tiny donations?
It's not about the money folks, it's about creating ActBlue accounts to facilitate what appears to be a massive scam. They're using these small donations to create a smokescreen of grassroots support all while potentially funneling much larger sums through these seemingly innocent transactions. This isn't just clever market.
@AndrewPatriot_ - ⭐Andrew⭐45 #MAGAdonian 🗽
Fraud in plain sight! And Democrats said there was no election fraud... https://t.co/mSyIESfgUh
@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire
“1% of voters in the bluest county in a swing state got duplicate ballots But don’t worry our political opponents caught us so we had to tell you all You can trust us that this won’t happen anywhere else” https://t.co/Cp4MYD6pXS
@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅
Dear Michigan, this is how dominion voting machines just rigged the Michigan Election. https://t.co/y4NBDhhBA3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion machines are certified and sealed, but vulnerabilities exist. Before elections, a supposed glitch prompts an emergency patch that opens backdoor access from a Serbian office, which is the true operational center of Dominion. This office, despite being presented as a U.S. company, has connections to Chinese nationals and operates on Huawei machines.
Using virtual machines, they manipulate election results by creating a hidden environment within the county election equipment. After altering the data, they collapse the virtual machine, leaving no trace unless a forensic audit is conducted. This manipulation is facilitated through connections to China, raising concerns about the integrity of the election process. For more information, visit Stolen Elections Facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Dominion machines, they get certified and sealed up and implemented. And then there's 15 different ways that the cheat occurs. But one of them is they right before the election, they have some glitch appear and they say, oh, we need to download a patch on an emergency basis. And then what the patch does is it opens up a a a hole in the back of the system from which they log on from their Serbian office. They don't they don't really admit this.
They didn't even admit they had a Serbian office. But the truth is Dominion, which is supposed to be a US company, the US company is just a front. The real center of gravity of Dominion is Serbia. And they've got a technical office there. And when it was discovered, they said, well, it it kind of does just R and D.
No. It's the center of gravity. And they log on from they log on to the back of our machines from Serbia, and they manipulate election results. And I have this dead to rights, we have this dead to rights. And what gets even funnier is they're doing this on Huawei machines.
Our elections are effectively being run on Huawei machines, which are Chinese servers. And the truth is behind Serbia is China. So China, there's a military institute in China, which is coming in through Serbia. There's Chinese nationals in the Serbian office, and they're logging on to our machines in the middle of election. I can even tell you how they do it.
There's such a thing in computers, been around in the public for about 20 years, called virtual machines. You create within a server, you create a virtual machine. And so to an operator of that machine, it looks like he's operating on 2 machines. It just operates like there's a but really that second machine is all in software and and it's all software. It's not there's no physical machine.
What they do is they come in through a back door that's opened up by this patch. They create a virtual machine within that machine within the actual county election equipment. From that virtual machine, they then manipulate the results, the database, the hard the data on the database, any way they want. When they're done, they withdraw and they collapse that virtual server. So there's no record of nothing.
There's a unless you go in and do a bits and bytes forensic audit, when you go in later and you look at the actual machine and all of its systems, you don't see anything. It's only if you do forensic you discover that somewhere in the middle of it all, they created a virtual machine inside, did all the manipulation through that. That's actually done from Serbia and behind Serbia the in Serbia, there are Chinese nationals doing it. Behind them, there's people in China, and this is all done on Huawei equipment. And if this sounds crazy, go to a website called Stolen Elections Facts, stolen elections, plural, facts.com.
It's all the documentation is laid out there.
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
Because Donald Trump questioned the voting machines during his final rally today I’m going to preemptively post this video of Democrats questioning machines for the fake news. https://t.co/SuvfC0TAXw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines remain highly vulnerable to tampering, as researchers have shown. Even those with limited skills can breach these systems quickly. In 2018, machines in Georgia and Texas were reported to have deleted or switched votes. Major manufacturers are compromising security by recommending remote access software, making machines targets for hackers. Many states still use outdated machines that are easy to hack, with 43% of American voters relying on systems known to have serious security flaws. Demonstrations have shown how easily these machines can be compromised. Additionally, aging systems often run unsupported software, increasing their susceptibility to cyber attacks. A successful hack could significantly impact close elections by targeting key swing states or counties. Concerns about potential breaches are growing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. The researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering.
Speaker 1: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another.
Speaker 0: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
Speaker 2: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
Speaker 1: You could easily hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact, 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines that some pose that pose some of the greatest risks.
Speaker 3: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines. Right, which are vulnerable to being hacked.
Speaker 2: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes.
Speaker 0: 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including backdoors.
Speaker 4: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
Speaker 3: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states.
Speaker 1: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack.
Speaker 2: In a close present or election, they just need to hack one swing state or maybe 1 or 2 or maybe just a few counties in one swing state.
Speaker 1: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Never forget! Between the hours of 1 AM and 5 AM, in PA, Joe Biden gained nearly 600,000 votes, which is statistically impossible. They did it once, and they're going to try to do it again!
@Robert_Cr59 - ⭐⭐⭐Robert Crosby⭐⭐⭐
Amazingly, every glitch, error, and accident nationwide favors one party. https://conservativeroof.com/early-votes-mysteriously-shift-in-favor-of-democrats/
HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? — LATEST UPDATE: 3000 Votes in Texas 'Mysteriously' S...
WHAT THE HELL?
conservativeroof.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared newly declassified documents revealing how Obama’s intel chiefs allegedly used their power to promote the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton continues to claim the 2016 election was rigged. Yet, Democrats label Trump a threat for questioning the 2020 results. It's a clear double standard. @SenRandPaul addressed this at the Senate Homeland Security Committee today.
@DailySignal - The Daily Signal
Newly declassified documents from @DNIGabbard show Obama’s intel chiefs used government power to push the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. And to this day, Hillary Clinton cries “rigged” at the 2016 election. But Democrats say President Trump is the threat for questioning Biden's win in 2020? Spare us the double standard. @SenRandPaul speaks on this at a Senate Homeland Security Committee today👇 https://t.co/l3O17jg16t
@mazemoore - MAZE
Before the 2016 election Obama repeatedly said that you're not supposed to cast doubt on the legitimacy of an election. Right after the election Obama launched the Russia hoax to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election. Perhaps the biggest scandal ever in American politics. https://t.co/PmfWgyYdZN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that sowing seeds of doubt about the legitimacy of our elections undermines democracy, calls it dangerous, and says it is work that benefits adversaries because democracy depends on people knowing that their vote matters and that those who occupy power were chosen by the people.
Speaker 1 states that every intelligence agency in the federal government arrived at a consensus that the Russians hacked the DNC, and that the information released was the consequence of a decision by Russian intelligence and Russian officials at the highest levels; the CIA assesses that it was done purposefully to tilt the election toward a particular candidate, which is not a surprise, and this was helping the Trump campaign and hurting the Hillary campaign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you try to sow the seeds of doubt in people's minds about the legitimacy of our elections, that undermines our democracy. No. No. No. I want everybody to pay attention here.
That is dangerous. You're doing the work of our adversaries for them because our democracy depends on people knowing that their vote matters, that those who occupy the seats of power were chosen by the people.
Speaker 1: Every intelligence agency in the federal government arrived at a consensus that the Russians had hacked, the DNC, and the information was that was now being released was as a consequence of a decision by Russian intelligence and Russian officials at the highest levels. So what the CIA is now assessing, which was it was done purposefully to tilt the election in another in the direction of a particular candidate shouldn't be a surprise to anybody, and in fact isn't a surprise to anybody. This was helping the Trump campaign, and it was hurting the the Hillary campaign.
@RealSpitfire - Spitfire
These election workers talked about the cheat openly. The only people who were prosecuted were the people who said there was cheating. https://t.co/f4S0AiZvbN
@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci
Reminder that they didn’t rig and steal the 2020 election for Biden. They stole it for Obama. https://t.co/mP1YTtLwwi
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that Democrats didn’t expect Trump to lead by hundreds of thousands in 2020, so they shut down swing-state voting locations to cheat and steal the election.
@TheSCIF - The SCIF
Democrats didn't expect Trump to be ahead by hundreds of thousands of votes in the 2020 election, which forced them to shut down multiple swing state's voting locations to cheat on top of already cheating in order to produce even more fraudulent votes to steal the 2020 election. https://t.co/rWxEvKr2oc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a video focused on data and evidence of alleged irregularities in the 2020 election, asserting that there has been no comprehensive place to see widespread fraud until now. He states the video is “pure data” and invites viewers to consider the statistical anomalies in three states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia) in the early hours of 11/04/2020, when Biden received major vote spikes after trailing Trump.
- He analyzes 8,954 individual vote updates and identifies a clear statistical pattern across nearly all updates, with four notably aberrant updates: two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia, all occurring in the same five-hour window in the middle of the night when counting reportedly stopped in some places.
- In Michigan, a 06:30AM update shows Biden at 141,258 votes to Trump’s 5,968, described as the most extreme update in all datasets across all states, followed by a noticeable ratio change in nearby updates. In Wisconsin, a single update allegedly moved Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. In Georgia, a 01:34AM Eastern Time update shows Biden at 136,155 to Trump’s 29,115. They claim these four spikes exceed the states’ margins of victory, making the spikes not only abnormal by percentage but also by magnitude. They conclude that if these four unlikely updates had not happened, the presidency could have been different.
- Detractors are cited as arguing human error, but the video questions where evidence of corrections is, and notes that California shows only one anomalous update in percentage, not enough magnitude to shift outcomes.
- A “consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time” is highlighted as allegedly impossible, with a Florida example showing 100 identical ratios over several days. The video asserts a computer algorithm is involved, termed a weighted race distribution, associated with Diebold voting machines (known as early as 2001), implying values rather than simple counts.
- In California, a single update is shown with Biden receiving about 65% and Trump 32% for one vote, raising questions about how one vote could go to more than one candidate.
Speaker 0 then links these patterns to alleged connections between Diebold and Dominion Voting Systems, claiming Dominion acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold, and that Dominion’s software is licensed from Smartmatic. They also note that forensic audits show errors and that the mainstream narrative claims these issues are misinformation. They reference NBC News and PBS findings on how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes.
Next, Speaker 0 notes eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia: poll worker Ruby allegedly was filmed in the backroom with absentee ballots, and at 10:30PM on November 3, media and poll watchers were told to leave, yet Ruby and others remained, pulling ballots from under a table and distributing them to counting stations. They describe Ruby running the same stack of ballots to the machine three times, observing a large Biden surge after 01:34AM Georgia time, and question whether a ballot can be counted more than once, citing Coffey County, Georgia as an example of someone claiming to scan the same batches repeatedly.
Speaker 0 references Raquel Rodriguez, arrested for election fraud in Texas over video evidence of ballot harvesting, and asserts that cybersecurity evidence indicates Dominion and Edison Research used an unencrypted VPN with easily accessible credentials allowing foreign access, asserting that China, Iran, and other countries accessed the servers, contradicting claims that Dominion machines were not connected to the Internet. They mention Dominion’s association with a Chinese-registered domain, and board members with Chinese nationality, alleging conflicts of interest through corporate ownership and licensing from Smartmatic.
Speaker 0 highlights that Antrim County, Michigan audits found high error and adjudication rates in Dominion, with an 68 o 5% error rate far above federal guidelines, missing logs for 2020, and reprogramming of election event designer cards during the safe harbor period. They point to subpoenas and the lack of access to logs, and to affidavits from poll workers claiming illegal activities, non-equal treatment of observers, counting without proper oversight, shredding ballots, and other irregularities.
Speaker 7 concludes with a claim that many Americans distrust the 2020 election and urges viewers to download and share the video, demand election reform, and notes that the video’s credits will continue with data readers, while warning of erasure or fact checks by tech platforms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No matter which side of the fence people have been on, they've been saying, show me the evidence. I'll believe it when I see the evidence. And people on both sides agree that something went terribly wrong in November 2020, but there really has been no comprehensive place to see the evidence of widespread fraud until now. This video is pure data, so don't get mad. You can't be angry when a scientist confirms that gravity pulls downward at negative 9.8 meters per second squared, even when that fact works against the narrative you've heard.
Here we go. Just before we show you some new disturbing video evidence, we'll talk about statistical anomalies in three states in question. In the early hours of 11/04/2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major vote spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, suddenly placing him in the lead when he had been trailing Trump by a significant margin. 8,954 individual vote updates were analyzed. Across nearly all updates, there follows a clear statistical pattern.
However, a very small number of batches are especially questionable. The four most notable aberrations were two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin and one in Georgia. And all occurred in the same five hour window in the middle of the night, when in some places counting reportedly had stopped. Not only do these updates not follow generally observed patterns, but their behavior is particularly extreme. For context, using publicly available data from the New York Times, here is a visualization of the number of votes by candidate in Michigan from the beginning of the election night to 7PM Eastern Time on November 4.
Trump is in red, Biden is in blue. Notice the sudden and improbable spike in votes for Biden at 06:30AM, where Biden received a 141,258 votes, while Trump only received 5,968. This extreme ratio is surrounded by updates that are nearly the same in ratio. This particular update is 23 times more votes for Biden and is the most extreme update favoring Biden in all datasets across all states. The situation in Wisconsin is even more stark.
A single update to the vote count brought Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. Thirdly, a vote update in Georgia at 01:34AM eastern time on November 4, which shows a 136,155 for Joe Biden and only 29,115 for Donald Trump. The extents of these four votes spikes in question are more than the margin of victory in all three states, which means the spikes were not only abnormal in regards to percentage for Joe Biden, but also in magnitude of the vote count. Out of roughly 9,000 updates, this election was decided by only four extreme updates, each with a probability of less than one tenth of 1%. Meaning that had these four unlikely updates not happened, we would have a different president in the White House.
Detractors argue that these spikes were merely human error and not indication of fraud, and the errors have been corrected. If the errors have been corrected, where is their evidence? Why were the results never changed? Others have said that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts. If that were the case, then California would show many spikes of that magnitude, but it doesn't.
Only one vote update in California is anomalous in percentage of Biden votes, but not enough magnitude to shift an outcome. The strangest anomaly visible in the data is consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which is theoretically impossible. Here is Florida. These updates occurred over a week following the election. Notice all the ratios of Biden to Trump votes are a 100 identical over several days.
This pattern shows up in many states. It appears that a computer algorithm is involved in the process, which is doing something called weighted race distribution, a feature of Diebold voting machines known as early as 2001, which gives values to votes rather than simply counting them. Here in California, we see an update of one vote. About 65% of that value is given to Biden and 32% to Trump. How can one vote go to more than one person?
It is well known and not disputed that Diebold software was found to be switching votes through programming in past elections. Even though Diebold is no longer used, Dominion Voting Systems acquired ESNS in 2010, which had previously acquired Diebold under its new name of Premier Election Solutions. This does not exhaust all statistical data anomalies encountered in the twenty twenty election, but data anomalies is only one factor to consider. Next is eyewitness and video evidence. In Georgia, there's a case of a poll worker named Ruby who was seen on Instagram giving a secretive live video of her working in the backroom filled with absentee ballots.
Speaker 1: I'm a look. I'm a let y'all see it here. Okay. Don't say nothing. Listen.
Speaker 0: At 10:30PM on November 3, all media and poll watchers were told to leave State Farm Arena because ballot counting was going to stop. But Ruby and her daughter and three others remained behind at State Farm Arena. They pulled boxes of ballots out from under the table that was placed there in the morning and distributed them to several counting stations.
Speaker 2: Back to Fulton County, Georgia right now, where our reporter, Blaine Alexander, apparently has some new reporting on the expectations for that count.
Speaker 3: Rachel, we've learned that the counting continues tonight. You know, right here in State Farm Arena behind me, we've learned that there are five people who are still inside, still working to scan those absentee ballots and try and get those numbers tabulated. Now initially, we believe we were told that everybody went home at about 10:30, but I just got off the phone with the county spokesperson who tells me that indeed there are still some people in there quite literally burning the midnight oil, scanning ballot after ballot, and trying to get that information in.
Speaker 2: And, Blaine, specifically, you said five people are inside that building? That's five of five actual individuals who are working on all the absentees in Fulton County right now? Just five? Wow. Talk about having that sort of fate of the nation in your hands.
Speaker 0: Ruby is seen here in this video running the exact same stack of ballots to the machine three times. Other workers do the same. Note that a large surge in Biden votes can be observed after this tabulation at o 06:34 Greenwich Mean Time, which is 01:34AM in Georgia, just after the time in question. You may ask, can a ballot really be counted more than once? Here is your answer from Coffey County, Georgia.
Speaker 4: Can you scan a ballot more than once?
Speaker 3: I've just done it.
Speaker 1: You just done just batch that she's
Speaker 3: been doing.
Speaker 4: Yeah. You just keep scanning.
Speaker 3: Usually. I just kept scanning same
Speaker 4: actually just keeps up with you.
Speaker 3: I just scanned the same batches that y'all just voted. Mhmm. I never got any more until that one.
Speaker 4: Don't know why they approved such a system.
Speaker 0: Ruby allegedly posted this later on social media. Of course, the mainstream media calls this misinformation and most references to these videos have been deleted from internet search results. Apple News, the morning of the election, sent out a push message to Apple News subscribers that elections are secure. So if it's true that election fraud is rare, what about Raquel Rodriguez? She was recently arrested for election fraud in Texas because of overwhelming video evidence incriminating herself that she was harvesting ballots for pay.
Speaker 1: Leave the top of ticket to get votes for either Biden. How many votes do you think you can deliver for us?
Speaker 5: At least 5,000.
Speaker 1: And what are we looking at as far as how much that's gonna cost?
Speaker 5: For the entire team that I'm looking at, I'm looking at 55,000.
Speaker 1: So $55,000 for 5,000 votes, pop the ticket, eager, Biden?
Speaker 5: If not not more, I'm I'm not gonna over promise because remember, we we're we're sixteen days till election day. You you give me cash, you can do whatever you wanna do.
Speaker 1: $55,000 upfront, 5,000 votes.
Speaker 5: That's right.
Speaker 0: Then there is cybersecurity evidence and the question of whether Dominion voting machines were tampered with over Internet connections. Signed affidavits under oath from cybersecurity experts indicate that Dominion Voter Systems and Edison Research were using an unencrypted VPN with login credentials that were easily accessible and used by foreign adversaries to monitor and manipulate votes. The IP addresses into the Edison Research host service went in both directions, meaning that not only were China and Iran and other countries accessing the servers, but also Edison Research was communicating back to these adversaries. The claims that Dominion voting machines were not connected to the Internet are completely false. Cybersecurity experts have followed the communication of the data from Dominion voting servers and Edison Research to foreign countries.
A simple web search will uncover that dominionvotingsystems.com is registered to a company in Hunan, China. Three of the seven board members of UBS Securities are Chinese nationals. That company owns Staples Street Capital, which in turn owns Dominion. On top of that, the Dominion software is licensed from Smartmatic, which is a Venezuelan owned and controlled company. And we're all familiar with how their elections go.
Furthermore, forensic audits of the machines reveal significant errors. Although the mainstream media and politicians are saying that it's dangerous misinformation that Dominion voting systems are unsecure, this was the very message that several left leaning news sources were claiming less than a year ago. NBC News and PBS found out just how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes.
Speaker 4: It's important to know that Georgia just spent over 100 or is about spent over a $100,000,000 on a contract with Dominion to provide image cast hardware to the state in time for the '20, for the for the next primaries and for the twenty twenty election. And yet here these kids were who had opened it up. They said, look. You can pop the front off of it, and here's a port you can get into right here. That's easy.
You know, all kinds of stuff that that you could certainly do within six minutes behind a curtain, much less, if you had extra time because any of these were, connected to the web as we discovered a couple days before, so many of them are.
Speaker 0: Despite opposition and attacks, election security experts were able to audit Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan, revealing unusually high error and adjudication rates. What does that mean? According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. Ballot errors are sent to adjudication, which means the vote can be decided by an election worker where there is no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail.
Speaker 6: We've scanned a 113,130 as of moments ago. We've adjudicated a 106,000 plus of those.
Speaker 0: Experts identified an error rate of 68 o 5%, which is far above the federal election commission guidelines of point 0008% or one in 250,000. Although vote adjudication logs are available for prior election years, suspiciously, all the logs for the 2020 cycle were missing. Moreover, all security logs prior to 11:03PM on November 4 are also missing. If that's not enough, the election event designer log shows that the Dominion Image cast precinct cards were reprogrammed on October 23 and again on November 5, which violates the Help America Vote Act, which includes a ninety day safe harbor period that prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware, and software updates without undergoing recertification. Even if skeptics and critics persist that these issues are inconsequential, they should be willing for forensic audits to take place for transparency, yet they have viciously attacked attempts to review logs.
Why is that if there's nothing to hide? Election officials in Maricopa County, Arizona have even ignored subpoenas for release of election data and Dominion Machine audits until after the inauguration. Then there's the mass influx of unsolicited mail in ballots. The keyword is unsolicited. In other words, people receiving ballots they never asked for.
Politicians use the coronavirus to push mass mail in ballots and extending the time to receive those ballots till many days after the election. There are many reports of people who voted in person also receiving multiple unsolicited ballots in the mail. People who did not send in a mail in ballot denied person voting because they were told they had voted already by mail when they hadn't. This opened up chaos in the system and uncertainty as to who actually voted. Additionally, signature verification requirements were slackened in many states adding even more uncertainty.
In fact, the Pennsylvania Secretary of State unilaterally removed legislative signature requirements for mail in ballots. More than a thousand signed affidavits have been given by poll workers who have witnessed illegal activities, non equal treatment of Republican poll watchers, counting ballots in locations with no poll watchers, poll not permitted close enough to see the counting process, shredding ballots, garbage bags full of ballots for Trump, entire boxes of hundreds of supposedly mail in ballots that have no folds indicating they were never actually mailed by anyone. The list goes on and on. These affidavits are signed by witnesses under penalty of perjury, so this should not have been taken lightly, but these witnesses were never heard in court. Unfortunately, what we have covered is only the tip of the iceberg on fraud, cover ups, federal election law violations, dishonesty on a global scale.
Speaker 7: So either the secretary of state's office is recording and certifying results that have negative errors and fraudulent votes in them, or someone is giving them negative information.
Speaker 0: Recent polls show an overwhelming percentage of The US don't trust the twenty election was without fraud. At the end of this video, the credits will be further data scrolling through that you can read for yourself and pause and go back and read again. So what can you do? Firstly, find a way to download this video and share it. Film it with your mobile phone.
Do anything to duplicate this. Post it with a hashtag, here is the evidence, hashtag every legal vote. Because guaranteed, big tech and social media giants will do their best to erase it from the internet as they've already done with much of evidence we've already shared. And if they can't erase it, they'll fake fact check it. Well, guess what?
We've already done the fact checking. We've gone through thousands of pages of data, sworn affidavits, forensic reports, and cyber security reports. Secondly, you can demand election reform from your election state and local officials. We cannot let another election ever be this questionable ever again. This is The United States Of America.
People used to look to us on how to have democracy through our voting system. 2020 was a complete sham and it cannot ever happen again.
reSee.it AI Summary
A Democrat County Supervisor in Hinds, Mississippi challenges his party's primary election results, citing massive fraud. Videotapes show someone inserting thumb drives and ballots into machines. The person responsible is the Hinds County Democrat party chair. Similar incidents occurred in the 2020 and 2022 elections in Arizona. If Democrats rig their own primaries, what might they do in general elections? Democrats are rigging elections everywhere. Kari Lake and Donald Trump are not alone in this concern.
@BehizyTweets - George
BREAKING: A Democrat County Supervisor in Hinds, Mississippi is challenging his party's primary election results after discovering massive election fraud "We have videotapes of someone going into boxes bringing in thumb drives, bringing in ballots to be inserted into the machines" The person he's talking about is the Hinds County Democrat party chair. If you watch this presentation, it sounds exactly like what happened in the 2020 election and 2022 election in Arizona. If Democrats are rigging their own primaries, imagine what they're doing in general elections. @KariLake @realDonaldTrump are not alone. Democrats are rigging elections everywhere
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Jackie Amos, the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party, of tampering with the Hinds County elections. They provide evidence of Amos' involvement in fraud and corruption, including videos and pictures. Another speaker discusses the lack of proper documentation and procedures in the election process, such as missing machine tapes, media sticks, voter signature books, and ballot accounting forms. They also mention the mishandling of materials and the failure of ES&S, the voting machine company, to provide digital imaging. The speaker calls for immediate action and urges the filing of criminal charges against Amos and her alleged co-conspirator. They emphasize the need for fair and honest elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hines County Democratic Party have a chairperson by the name of Jackie Amos. We book we believe and we have evidence that Jackie Amos is tampering with the Hinds County elections. I provided each of you with a copy of the information In her, conspiracy and correspondence to someone concerning My election on August 8th. I cannot read all and everything that she said on this, Paper, because some of it, the words are not fit to use. She correspond with an individual.
That individual call the chairperson, Jackie Amos, or texted chairperson, Jackie Amos, and stated, hey, Don't let them keep their prediction out of her election. She won fair and square. Jackie Amos respond to that text was that she won. But I'm going to f David Archie on the site. This matter came from the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party.
And so on today, we asking that the Hinds County Democratic Party take immediate Action. We're asking that she step down from her position as high end county chairperson of the Democratic Party, Along with Sandra McCall, who is the secretary, who is her running buddy in and around this election, We have videotape of Jackie Amos going into boxes, bringing in thumb drives, Bringing in, ballots to be inserted into machines, we have pictures of Jackie Amos participating in what we think that is fraud as well as corruption. And so We wanna be absolutely clear that this matter is not only with the Hinds County Democratic Party, but this matter is With every citizen in the state of Mississippi, this is the opportunity to stop corruption and to stop fraud when it comes to elections in the state of Mississippi.
Speaker 1: Three components To verify the vote, the first thing is the paper ballot. I stand before you to to say 26 out of 26 Preceipts contain the paper ballot. 26, component 1. Component number 2 are the machine tapes. The machine tapes is a count of every voter that went and used that machine.
I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts did not did not include the tapes. Don't worry. There's a third component. There is something called a mediastick. It is the brains of the machine.
Some of you may call it a thumb drive or something. I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts Did not include the media sticks in the ballot box. So already, you know, I'm setting A tone. There's a theme here. There's a theme.
But the d s two hundred offers an additional measure that they don't mention a lot, but it's there. It's called digital imagery, which is a picture of every ballot. Not one. Not one. Now that would not have been for the Democratic Party to put in, but that was a request we made to e s and s, and we'll discuss them later.
But they should have been a 40 to us, not 1 digital image. So that whole process of DS 200 being able to tell us what the actual vote vote was went out the window. We only receive paper ballots. Then we have don't worry. I'm just gonna put it out there in the open.
There's another mechanism. Each of us, we're familiar. We show our ID. We walk in the poll, show the ID. We sign a book.
It's called the voter register. We call it the signature book. And sometimes if we're counting trying to work as a poll watcher, you'll say, tell me what line you were on so we are low the number Of the vote? 26. I stand corrected.
20. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include that voter signature book. 20 out of 26 did not include the voter signature. Hold on. All hope is not lost yet.
There is something That's called the ballot accounting form. I call it the 10 40. Line 1 says how many Ballots did you get? How many did you use? How many was affidavit and how many was for?
And you add and subtract. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include the ballot accounting form. There again, we don't know how many votes took place because all we have are the paper ballots. Bear with me. We have absentee ballots.
26 out of 26 precincts, There were no absentee ballots in those boxes. I'm going to explain that. There were no absentee ballots In those boxes out of 26 precincts. But we are creatures of habit Because there were some affidavits. And guess what the number is?
26 Out of 26 voting precincts did not have affidavits in the ballot box. 26 out of 26 voting precincts, my favorite two words, did not Did not contain the express ballot. Now as it relates to comminly, This is their elect in duty. That's a blatant violation disrespect of your work. We found in district 2 material that belonged to district 1 And district 3 and district 5, all in the ballot box, that is district 2.
That is just a total blatant disrespect, lazy, for a lack of a better word, Just irresponsible. And not only did I find that, I found it on 3 occasions, commingling Of district. I didn't say his other precinct. Someone else's district material are in these boxes. If that didn't wasn't enough to rattle you, I found a document dated 2022 For a runoff election in 2022, these women and men Broke shame to our electoral process.
As it relates to the integrity of the ballot, 26 out of 26th precinct ballot boxes were not sealed properly. They were not affixed over the lock. They did not board when we removed them. Not one still aborted. People have free will to go in and out of those boxes.
Let's talk about the seal logs. 20 out of 26 offered a seal log. And even 2 of them mentioned That at the opening of the poll, there were no seals. Mister Archie already shared that the Democratic committee, the executive committee, did not come. They didn't have to, but you would think this is their election.
Often time, you see them present. But Mister Zach, mister Zach Wallace, a Hinds County circuit clerk, he attended 4 days out of 6. The other 2 days he sent us a mister Wells. Now I wanna share the media sticks. On Wednesday of last week, 1st day of the review, I say to mister Zach, Where are the media sticks?
Listen close. It's recorded. Mister Zach says to us, I do not know where the media sticks are, miss Walker. I said, do you recognize those, the brains? Miss Walker, I do not know where the sticks are.
That's on Wednesday. I then asked him on Thursday morning, Where are the media sticks? He said, miss Walker, I do not know where the media sticks are. I said, could you at least try to find out, mister Zack? I need the media fixed.
On Friday morning, I asked mister Zach, where are the media sticks? I don't know, miss Walker. I said, please try to find the media Sticks. We did late lunch. When we returned, I said you got some sticks, mister Zack.
Not yet, miss Walker, but I'm working on it. I stand before you to tell you that about 2:30 on Friday afternoon, Mister Zack located the media sticks. No, sir. No, ma'am. They were not in the vault At his office locked up.
They were here in this building with election commissioner mister Clark. Mister Clark said to me I asked him, when did you get them? I'm not sure of the date that I received it. Who did you get them from? Who gave them to you?
He did not answer that question. He advises me that he has the right to be involved with this election. The law does not dictate That he's the custodial person of anything. Those items are to be locked in mister Zack's vault. They in in addition to that, those numbers were not even in a sealed Locked bag.
It was a red canvas bag with no lock. To make matters worse, they were all commingled. It was well over a100. The law does not allow me to handle materials outside of the precinct that I'm representing. To make matters even worse, mister Clark had the audacity To walk back to his office and keep the media at 6.
He never turned them over to mister Zach. He never in our presence turned those sticks over to mister Zach. So before you leave, Check with mister Clark. He still may have them in his possession. These are outside of the statues, not not thus says Cynthia Walker, But thus says the law of Mississippi, not only did that happen When I talked to mister Zach about the affidavit, Every day I spoke to mister Zach about the affidavit.
And every day, mister Zach told me, miss Walker, I don't know where they are. I don't know where they are, miss Walker. The ballot that had been voted and counted for affidavits. Didn't know where they were. In the matter of the absentee ballots that should have been our buck, mister Zach did tell me they were under lock and key at his office.
Mister Zach received notice that we were coming here for a review. Those ballots should have been brought here. And when I asked him why did they not bring the absentee ballots to this location. He said, first of all, miss Walker, it's 2 boxes. They're in a paper they're in 2 paper boxes, and they're co mingled.
And it's nearly 1800 of them. You, miss Walker, will have to decide which one belong to, mister mister Archie. That's not what the law says. That's not my that does not fall within the scope of my responsibility. When I tell you the Democratic Hinds County executive committee failed their constituents.
I pray that mister Archie will take these notes. I pray I challenge you all to take them. As each one of these election commissioners, don't I know what I'm talking about? I challenge you all to go up there And called Kyle Kirkpatrick. Kyle Kirkpatrick.
Kirk, k I r k. Kirkpatrick at the secretary of state's office. And I will tell you that he's going to tell you these are felony infractions. No one has the right to remove Valid information from these boxes. All of this all of this, I will not leave this podium without mentioning e, s, and s because that's the question y'all have.
I can read your mind. Before the review, mister Zach notified mister Archie and his opponent That e s ES and S had been notified. They agreed to come to the ballot box review. But when we arrived on Wednesday, we received that they were going to be available by phone. They were not providing those digital imaging.
That was Wednesday. On Friday, I called them When we located the media sticks, spoke to a man named mister Ken Williams. And mister Ken said, my question was, we found 1 tape. But why does it say August 28th? And we are working on August 8.
Mister Ken tells me he cannot answer that question. Mister Ken did agree To come the next morning for the ballot box review. You know the answer. Mind read me. Mister Ken and no other representative From ES and S has presented themselves for this ballot box review.
When I told you that we are detailed and we are my prodigal, I want Hinds County to know. I'm from a county that had their own problems. And I stand, and I'm fighting theirs as well. But I also want us to know, all of the materials We're withheld from this review process because it's my professional opinion. My professional position because I've done nearly 40 ballot box reviews.
And never n e v e r have I seen such a poor representation A ballot boxes. Never been almost 40 reviews. And I've been doing this 50 plus years. These materials were withheld because they knew full well. They knew that Jackie Amos' and Tony Johnson, whoever has influence, they knew full well But there was no balancing in those paper ballots.
They dictated the number of paper ballots And they gave us nothing to support it. Not one, nothing to support. But the law says they should. The law says they should. The law says they should.
The executive committee decision to withhold these voting documents denied supervisor David Archer His absolute right to verify the true vote. But even more even more, You disrespected the constituents of Heinz too. That's right. We will not know the will by the voter. You have no one has the right to think that they can operate elections.
The Burger King See, have it your way. It's out in the open today. It's out in the open. There will be nothing else to hide because I'm not like others. Baby, I know this stuff.
Take it to the bank. I know it. I attend the secretary of state's training. I've done enough ballot box reviews I can close my eyes. I walk.
I talk a lot, but I walk the talk. I know when fraud is amongst us. I know when you have 1, you oftentimes have 1 or 2 boxes that's astray. But when 26 boxes is compromised, There is growth misconduct. There's radical departure from the election law.
I challenge you news investigators. Ask one of the commissioners. Call Kyle. Verify. Confirm me.
And I tell you every item that I have listed is against Mississippi statute. Their negative behavior impeded his right. And I'm encouraging let's put it out in the open. I'm encouraging mister Archie To leave here because Yahweh can invite y'all. Follow me.
To leave here and file Criminal charges against Tony, against Jackie Amos who's gonna say Totally is her coconspirator. I stand before you right now. I stand before you right now to say This is an illegal process. This man is due. This man is due.
This man is due his reelection. The constituents are due. He's not acting for anything outside, what is absolutely dictated by law. And anyone that gets offended, I told them that the other day. There was a heated exchange.
If somebody's angry, Take it up with the Democratic Party, the executive committee. They're the ones that did the poop work, not us. I'm just the examiner. I am Cynthia Johnson Walker. I stand on this message, And I approve this message that starting today, we're gonna have a new way, a honest, fair Way of election.
Because if not, I'm calling you out. And I call you out free. This is Enough already. I thank you for your time. If you need a copy of my notes, I'm sure mister Archer will say we can give them.
And I pray that you all, the investigators that you are, take this story and verify If it's waiting, if it's truthful. Thank you again for your time.
@amuse - @amuse
ELECTION FORTIFICATION: Democrats describe how leaders of their party rigged voting machine to change the outcome of the Democrat primary. Presumably, they would never do this in the general election…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses Jackie Amos, the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party, of tampering with the Hinds County elections. They provide evidence of Amos' involvement in fraud and corruption, including videos and pictures. Another speaker discusses the lack of proper documentation and procedures in the election process, such as missing machine tapes, media sticks, voter signature books, and ballot accounting forms. They also mention the mishandling of materials and the failure of ES&S, a voting system company, to provide digital imaging. The speaker calls for immediate action and urges the filing of criminal charges against those involved. They emphasize the need for fair and honest elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hines County Democratic Party have a chairperson by the name of Jackie Amos. We book we believe and we have evidence that Jackie Amos is tampering with the Hinds County elections. I provided each of you with a copy of the information In her, conspiracy and correspondence to someone concerning My election on August 8th. I cannot read all and everything that she said on this, Paper, because some of it, the words are not fit to use. She correspond with an individual.
That individual call the chairperson, Jackie Amos, or texted chairperson, Jackie Amos, and stated, hey, Don't let them keep their prediction out of her election. She won fair and square. Jackie Amos respond to that text was that she won. But I'm going to f David Archie on the site. This matter came from the chairperson of the Hinds County Democratic Party.
And so on today, we asking that the Hinds County Democratic Party take immediate Action. We're asking that she step down from her position as high end county chairperson of the Democratic Party, Along with Sandra McCall, who is the secretary, who is her running buddy in and around this election, We have videotape of Jackie Amos going into boxes, bringing in thumb drives, Bringing in, ballots to be inserted into machines, we have pictures of Jackie Amos participating in what we think that is fraud as well as corruption. And so We wanna be absolutely clear that this matter is not only with the Hinds County Democratic Party, but this matter is With every citizen in the state of Mississippi, this is the opportunity to stop corruption and to stop fraud when it comes to elections in the state of Mississippi.
Speaker 1: Three components To verify the vote, the first thing is the paper ballot. I stand before you to to say 26 out of 26 Preceipts contain the paper ballot. 26, component 1. Component number 2 are the machine tapes. The machine tapes is a count of every voter that went and used that machine.
I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts did not did not include the tapes. Don't worry. There's a third component. There is something called a mediastick. It is the brains of the machine.
Some of you may call it a thumb drive or something. I stand before you to tell you 26 out of 26 precincts Did not include the media sticks in the ballot box. So already, you know, I'm setting A tone. There's a theme here. There's a theme.
But the d s two hundred offers an additional measure that they don't mention a lot, but it's there. It's called digital imagery, which is a picture of every ballot. Not one. Not one. Now that would not have been for the Democratic Party to put in, but that was a request we made to e s and s, and we'll discuss them later.
But they should have been a 40 to us, not 1 digital image. So that whole process of DS 200 being able to tell us what the actual vote vote was went out the window. We only receive paper ballots. Then we have don't worry. I'm just gonna put it out there in the open.
There's another mechanism. Each of us, we're familiar. We show our ID. We walk in the poll, show the ID. We sign a book.
It's called the voter register. We call it the signature book. And sometimes if we're counting trying to work as a poll watcher, you'll say, tell me what line you were on so we are low the number Of the vote? 26. I stand corrected.
20. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include that voter signature book. 20 out of 26 did not include the voter signature. Hold on. All hope is not lost yet.
There is something That's called the ballot accounting form. I call it the 10 40. Line 1 says how many Ballots did you get? How many did you use? How many was affidavit and how many was for?
And you add and subtract. 20 out of 26 precincts did not include the ballot accounting form. There again, we don't know how many votes took place because all we have are the paper ballots. Bear with me. We have absentee ballots.
26 out of 26 precincts, There were no absentee ballots in those boxes. I'm going to explain that. There were no absentee ballots In those boxes out of 26 precincts. But we are creatures of habit Because there were some affidavits. And guess what the number is?
26 Out of 26 voting precincts did not have affidavits in the ballot box. 26 out of 26 voting precincts, my favorite two words, did not Did not contain the express ballot. Now as it relates to comminly, This is their elect in duty. That's a blatant violation disrespect of your work. We found in district 2 material that belonged to district 1 And district 3 and district 5, all in the ballot box, that is district 2.
That is just a total blatant disrespect, lazy, for a lack of a better word, Just irresponsible. And not only did I find that, I found it on 3 occasions, commingling Of district. I didn't say his other precinct. Someone else's district material are in these boxes. If that didn't wasn't enough to rattle you, I found a document dated 2022 For a runoff election in 2022, these women and men Broke shame to our electoral process.
As it relates to the integrity of the ballot, 26 out of 26th precinct ballot boxes were not sealed properly. They were not affixed over the lock. They did not board when we removed them. Not one still aborted. People have free will to go in and out of those boxes.
Let's talk about the seal logs. 20 out of 26 offered a seal log. And even 2 of them mentioned That at the opening of the poll, there were no seals. Mister Archie already shared that the Democratic committee, the executive committee, did not come. They didn't have to, but you would think this is their election.
Often time, you see them present. But Mister Zach, mister Zach Wallace, a Hinds County circuit clerk, he attended 4 days out of 6. The other 2 days he sent us a mister Wells. Now I wanna share the media sticks. On Wednesday of last week, 1st day of the review, I say to mister Zach, Where are the media sticks?
Listen close. It's recorded. Mister Zach says to us, I do not know where the media sticks are, miss Walker. I said, do you recognize those, the brains? Miss Walker, I do not know where the sticks are.
That's on Wednesday. I then asked him on Thursday morning, Where are the media sticks? He said, miss Walker, I do not know where the media sticks are. I said, could you at least try to find out, mister Zack? I need the media fixed.
On Friday morning, I asked mister Zach, where are the media sticks? I don't know, miss Walker. I said, please try to find the media Sticks. We did late lunch. When we returned, I said you got some sticks, mister Zack.
Not yet, miss Walker, but I'm working on it. I stand before you to tell you that about 2:30 on Friday afternoon, Mister Zack located the media sticks. No, sir. No, ma'am. They were not in the vault At his office locked up.
They were here in this building with election commissioner mister Clark. Mister Clark said to me I asked him, when did you get them? I'm not sure of the date that I received it. Who did you get them from? Who gave them to you?
He did not answer that question. He advises me that he has the right to be involved with this election. The law does not dictate That he's the custodial person of anything. Those items are to be locked in mister Zack's vault. They in in addition to that, those numbers were not even in a sealed Locked bag.
It was a red canvas bag with no lock. To make matters worse, they were all commingled. It was well over a100. The law does not allow me to handle materials outside of the precinct that I'm representing. To make matters even worse, mister Clark had the audacity To walk back to his office and keep the media at 6.
He never turned them over to mister Zach. He never in our presence turned those sticks over to mister Zach. So before you leave, Check with mister Clark. He still may have them in his possession. These are outside of the statues, not not thus says Cynthia Walker, But thus says the law of Mississippi, not only did that happen When I talked to mister Zach about the affidavit, Every day I spoke to mister Zach about the affidavit.
And every day, mister Zach told me, miss Walker, I don't know where they are. I don't know where they are, miss Walker. The ballot that had been voted and counted for affidavits. Didn't know where they were. In the matter of the absentee ballots that should have been our buck, mister Zach did tell me they were under lock and key at his office.
Mister Zach received notice that we were coming here for a review. Those ballots should have been brought here. And when I asked him why did they not bring the absentee ballots to this location. He said, first of all, miss Walker, it's 2 boxes. They're in a paper they're in 2 paper boxes, and they're co mingled.
And it's nearly 1800 of them. You, miss Walker, will have to decide which one belong to, mister mister Archie. That's not what the law says. That's not my that does not fall within the scope of my responsibility. When I tell you the Democratic Hinds County executive committee failed their constituents.
I pray that mister Archie will take these notes. I pray I challenge you all to take them. As each one of these election commissioners, don't I know what I'm talking about? I challenge you all to go up there And called Kyle Kirkpatrick. Kyle Kirkpatrick.
Kirk, k I r k. Kirkpatrick at the secretary of state's office. And I will tell you that he's going to tell you these are felony infractions. No one has the right to remove Valid information from these boxes. All of this all of this, I will not leave this podium without mentioning e, s, and s because that's the question y'all have.
I can read your mind. Before the review, mister Zach notified mister Archie and his opponent That e s ES and S had been notified. They agreed to come to the ballot box review. But when we arrived on Wednesday, we received that they were going to be available by phone. They were not providing those digital imaging.
That was Wednesday. On Friday, I called them When we located the media sticks, spoke to a man named mister Ken Williams. And mister Ken said, my question was, we found 1 tape. But why does it say August 28th? And we are working on August 8.
Mister Ken tells me he cannot answer that question. Mister Ken did agree To come the next morning for the ballot box review. You know the answer. Mind read me. Mister Ken and no other representative From ES and S has presented themselves for this ballot box review.
When I told you that we are detailed and we are my prodigal, I want Hinds County to know. I'm from a county that had their own problems. And I stand, and I'm fighting theirs as well. But I also want us to know, all of the materials We're withheld from this review process because it's my professional opinion. My professional position because I've done nearly 40 ballot box reviews.
And never n e v e r have I seen such a poor representation A ballot boxes. Never been almost 40 reviews. And I've been doing this 50 plus years. These materials were withheld because they knew full well. They knew that Jackie Amos' and Tony Johnson, whoever has influence, they knew full well But there was no balancing in those paper ballots.
They dictated the number of paper ballots And they gave us nothing to support it. Not one, nothing to support. But the law says they should. The law says they should. The law says they should.
The executive committee decision to withhold these voting documents denied supervisor David Archer His absolute right to verify the true vote. But even more even more, You disrespected the constituents of Heinz too. That's right. We will not know the will by the voter. You have no one has the right to think that they can operate elections.
The Burger King See, have it your way. It's out in the open today. It's out in the open. There will be nothing else to hide because I'm not like others. Baby, I know this stuff.
Take it to the bank. I know it. I attend the secretary of state's training. I've done enough ballot box reviews I can close my eyes. I walk.
I talk a lot, but I walk the talk. I know when fraud is amongst us. I know when you have 1, you oftentimes have 1 or 2 boxes that's astray. But when 26 boxes is compromised, There is growth misconduct. There's radical departure from the election law.
I challenge you news investigators. Ask one of the commissioners. Call Kyle. Verify. Confirm me.
And I tell you every item that I have listed is against Mississippi statute. Their negative behavior impeded his right. And I'm encouraging let's put it out in the open. I'm encouraging mister Archie To leave here because Yahweh can invite y'all. Follow me.
To leave here and file Criminal charges against Tony, against Jackie Amos who's gonna say Totally is her coconspirator. I stand before you right now. I stand before you right now to say This is an illegal process. This man is due. This man is due.
This man is due his reelection. The constituents are due. He's not acting for anything outside, what is absolutely dictated by law. And anyone that gets offended, I told them that the other day. There was a heated exchange.
If somebody's angry, Take it up with the Democratic Party, the executive committee. They're the ones that did the poop work, not us. I'm just the examiner. I am Cynthia Johnson Walker. I stand on this message, And I approve this message that starting today, we're gonna have a new way, a honest, fair Way of election.
Because if not, I'm calling you out. And I call you out free. This is Enough already. I thank you for your time. If you need a copy of my notes, I'm sure mister Archer will say we can give them.
And I pray that you all, the investigators that you are, take this story and verify If it's waiting, if it's truthful. Thank you again for your time.
George on X
BREAKING: A Democrat County Supervisor in Hinds, Mississippi is challenging his party's primary election results after discovering massive election fraud
"We have videotapes of someone going into boxes bringing in thumb drives, bringing in ballots to be inserted into the…
twitter.com