reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@AgramSeth - wolfpack
This is damning. https://t.co/Dp3qiuyK60
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks how the speaker plans to convince Americans who are upset about Hunter Biden's laptop that he is fighting for them. Speaker 1 dismisses the laptop allegations as a smear, stating that every serious investigator has debunked them. He mentions previous similar allegations and points to overwhelming evidence from the intelligence community that the Russians are involved. Speaker 1 defends his son's integrity and highlights that during the impeachment, all major Trump officials testified under oath that Biden did his job and broke no laws. He criticizes the president for contributing to the crass and dirty state of politics. Speaker 0 asks one more question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what about the Americans who really today only want me to ask you about Hunter Biden's laptop? How are you going to get them to see that you are fighting for them when they're so upset against you?
Speaker 1: There's nothing to any of that. Nothing to any of that. It's all a smear. Every major outfit, every serious investigator has pointed out that this is a smear. This is classic Trump.
We have 4 days left and all of a sudden, there's a laptop. And you may recall, there's also talk about 4 months before, there was a similar thing that somebody had allegedly. There's overwhelming evidence that from the intelligence community that the Russians are engaged. Look, this is my son's an honorable man And all the investigations that were done around the issue of what was going on in Ukraine, if you notice, every one of the major people who worked for Trump During the impeachment, went under oath. And under oath said Biden did his job.
No law was provided. This Biden Did his job. Hunter Biden broke no laws. That was the testimony. Their testimony from Republicans and intelligence community people.
So I think that is, you know, I just think, look, politics become too crass, too dirty, too ugly. And the and the perpetrator of an awful lot of this is Ben. He didn't start at all, but he has taken it to a new level this president.
Speaker 0: One question? Okay. Sure.
@karma44921039 - karma
Well this makes sense https://t.co/xoyEsVct0j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's role in the Middle East is believed by some to be connected to the fulfillment of prophecy and the battle of Armageddon. The idea is that a devastating war, involving nuclear weapons, will lead people to plead for an end to war. The proposed solution is to establish a global government by dismantling national sovereignty, uniting humanity under one authority.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What role, in the Middle East again does Israel play in this? Israel was created as the instrument to bring about the battle of Armageddon and the fulfillment of prophecy. A war that would be so terrible, where nuclear weapons will be used so that the American citizens and the other people in the world would get down on their knees and beg for no more war. What is the answer to that? They're gonna be told the only way we can guarantee no more war is if we destroy the sovereignty of nations and we come together as 1 humanity in 1 world government.
@kimrunner - Kim Runner
Just hearing this for the first time. Anyone know if this is true? https://t.co/IYtVSOEhpd
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals a surprising reason why America, the UK, and France support Israel. Contrary to popular belief, it's not about oil but rather the Suez Canal. Egypt currently owns the canal and earns $9 billion annually from it. The Americans, British, French, and Israelis want a share of this profit. To achieve this, they plan to build the Ben Gurion Canal by nuking a rocky area in the Middle East. This new canal would allow two ships to pass simultaneously, unlike the current Suez Canal. It would empty into the Mediterranean at the northern point of Gaza, resulting in the displacement of Palestinians to the south.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've all been getting played. My mind is blown. I just watched something that answers every question about why America, the UK, and France are so staunchly in support of Israel and what it's doing right now. And of course, it has to do with money, obviously, but not what we would have thought of. I think we all would have assumed it was oil.
Turns out it's not. Turns out this is what it's all about. This is the Suez Canal. This is owned by Egypt. The Suez Canal makes about $9,000,000,000 a year.
And where does that $9,000,000,000 go to? It goes to Egypt. Egypt nationalized the canal, so it makes all the profit. So who's not collecting on this are the Americans, the British, and the French, the Israelis. They wanna change that.
Enter the Ben Gurion Canal project over here. This is what's happening right now in the Middle East. What we're seeing on TV is all a ploy. It's all about granting access for this canal. The American and Israeli government plan on nuking this land over here to build a canal.
They're going to use this land because that land is built out of a rocky terrain, whereas the Suez Canal is built on more of a sandy terrain. By digging through a rockier ground, they would have more likelihood to have a wider canal allowing 2 ships to pass each other at the same time as opposed to 1 ship which is presently happening in the Suez Canal. And where do you think that canal empties? Not just in the Mediterranean Sea. The Ben Gurion Canal would empty right in northern Gaza.
The Ben Gurion Canal would empty into the Mediterranean at the northern point of Gaza. Northern Gaza. So all we're seeing here, ethnic cleansing, genocide, forcing all of the Palestinians into the south of Gaza. It's all to build this
@OffCyndisc - Cyndi
Interesting.. 🧐 https://t.co/UNL4lP1JDp
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to a government website, prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in America, after heart disease and cancer. Shockingly, around half of those who died had taken their medications correctly, following doctors' instructions. This means that even when people followed medical advice, they still ended up dying. Errors such as incorrect dosages or improper use of medications contributed to these deaths. It is concerning that prescription drugs, meant to help, can have such fatal consequences. This information is directly from a .gov website, and it is important to acknowledge these facts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government literally tells you that their prescription drugs are killing you. The 1st leading cause of death in America is heart disease, followed by the 2nd leading cause of death which is Cancer. Then guess what the 3rd leading cause of death in America is? They literally say, quote unquote, our prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. I'm not making any of this up y'all.
This is on .gov website. Reads here, quote unquote, our prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe. Around half of those who died have taken their drugs correctly. Hold on. Let me take a step back y'all.
Did you read that correctly? Around half of those who have died took in their drugs correctly. So they did exactly like the doctors told them, and they still ended up dying. They would have been better they're off doing nothing, and not even seeing the doctors letting their body fight it off. Half died because of errors such as too high of doses or the wrong use of, you know, the medications, and I better not get deleted or banned for this video because I'm literally reading off .gov websites.
This is them saying this. They are literally saying our prescription drugs are the 3rd leading cause of death in America.
@karma44921039 - karma
Highly concerning if true https://t.co/JoMKCo4KzC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the second wave, which they believe will be an electromagnetic weapon. They express concern for children and claim that measures have been put in place to remove them from their homes. They also mention the installation of 5G antennas near schools and warn parents not to send their children to school. The speaker believes that the intention is to declare that children have been affected by COVID-19 and quarantine them, potentially separating them from their parents. They acknowledge the difficulty in accepting this information but emphasize the importance of the document they have translated, which offers ways to protect one's health and immune system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 2nd wave, will be the electromagnetic weapon, and that is what we are facing now. And that's why this document is so important. Because if we're going to survive this, we need to take measures to protect our health, to, avoid, being targets, and especially to build up our own immune system and our own bodily strength. And we they offer information on how you can do that. And I'd like to end by saying that I am extremely worried about the children and that's why today I wanted to do a live stream because during the lockdown, as we've seen again from this document, it was actually part this is a global agenda.
And because I'm international, I see, how this agenda is playing out across the world because I see the repetition. I see the identical repetition in each country. And so I see that measures have been put in place for children to be removed from their homes And we know that the lockdown measures included the, the speeded up, installation of 5 gs. And we know and you can see here in Vienna, I've been shocked to see how many enormous antennas have been installed immediately outside schools, nurseries, kindergartens. It's horrifying.
And, I'm also told that YGIG has been widely installed in British schools. So I have to warn parents, do not send your children to school because the 2nd wave is going to be the electromagnetic radiation and the intention is to declare that the children have been affected by the alleged COVID and they're quarantining the school and parents may never see their children again. And that is real and, you know, we're we're we're all in a state of cognitive dissonance. Yeah. I wake up every morning, you know, for for for a long time, I've been doing this for 26 months.
And for a long time in those early months, why I woke up in the morning and I pinched myself and I said this cannot be true. It cannot be true. And you know, the the the normal human mind, the non psychopathic human mind, just goes into cognitive dissonance. You know, I can understand that people can't deal with this. Yeah.
So even now as I as I talk about this situation with the children, you know, I I myself, I I find it hard to, to to accept this. Yeah? But I have looked at the legal arrangements that have been put in place, and I know the agenda. I've studied it. And I also have talked to a wonderful researcher called Lena Pu.
And I hope that she will forgive me for saying this, But she does know that an electromagnetic weapon was used in an American school. And I think I have to say that now with so many children at stake, it has already been done. So I really want to bring this document to the world and offer it as or offer my translation of this wonderful document. I thank the French Army Reserve officers so much for producing this document. So my contribution is to have translated it and I really regard it as a gift to the world because they clearly see the extreme danger that we are all in and they're offering you something that will help you to survive and to protect your children.
So I'd like to
@Alphafox78 - AlphaFo𝕏
Interesting.. 🤔 https://t.co/vckUUNKp50
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mary Mahoney, a former Clinton White House intern, was killed in 1997. Vince Foster, a White House counsel, was found dead in 1993. James McDougall, a key witness, died before testifying in 1998. Seth Rich, a DNC staffer, was shot and killed in 2016. Shawn Lucas, an attorney, was found dead in 2016. These deaths have raised speculation about foul play and potential connections to political events, but official reports have not confirmed any wrongdoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster, was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC.
He supposedly killed himself, and among a lengthy list potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. Old he was serving his 3 year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougal his body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly 2 miles from the base of the trail he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shibe's death electrical accidental drowning, but he might have known too much.
27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked e mails allegedly sent by D and C staffers, and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when he returned home on August 2nd. His death was reported classified pending the results of
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
Why didn’t anyone question this? https://t.co/vhG1UO6W92
Video Transcript AI Summary
Love's Baby Soft is a fragrance that captures the irresistible appeal of babies. It offers a range of products including body lotion, body powder, and body mist, all infused with the innocent scent of a clean and cuddly baby. This fragrance is so innocent that it becomes surprisingly sexy. Love's Baby Soft believes that innocence is more seductive than one might think. Perfect for gifting your baby this Christmas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's 1 person nobody can resist, and that's a baby. So love made baby soft. With the innocent scent of a cuddly, clean baby that grew up very sexy, and foaming bad body lotion, body powder, and body mist. So innocent, it may well be the sexiest fragrance around. Love's baby soft because innocence is sexier than you think.
For your baby at Christmas.
@Babygravy9 - RAW EGG NATIONALIST
It's almost as if there's some kind of agenda at work...
@nypost - New York Post
‘Love at first sight’ is real, body language expert reveals — 6 signs to know someone is hot for you https://trib.al/URs2SHD
SocialFlow
trib.al
@MakaveliMemez - Makaveli Memez
Does anyone here suspect that he’s lying? 🤔 https://t.co/e5nU6dZocF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Did you give Mrs. Willis the double shocker and then drill her while shouting, "We're gonna get Trump"? No.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you give missus Willis the, double shocker and then drill her booty hole while shouting, we're gonna get Trump ever? Ever. Ever. No.
@LaurenWitzkeDE - Lauren Witzke
If true, this is some pretty dark stuff. But honestly, it wouldn’t surprise me at all. https://t.co/cf2k8cjYWD
Video Transcript AI Summary
I worked as a travel nurse at a hospital specializing in organ transplants. I learned that many Israeli citizens come to the US for healthcare if they can't get the treatment they need in Israel. They receive organs from US donors. I suspect some Israelis may be getting preferential treatment on the transplant waitlist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Time spent travel nursing. I worked at a hospital, and I was floated onto a floor that I didn't normally go to, and they specialized in organ transplants. And within 5 minutes of me being on the floor that day and getting report, I heard someone make a comment about, oh, It's okay. Half the floor is Israeli anyway. And I didn't really know what that meant.
So I asked the girl that was about to give me a report and she was like, oh, yeah. Like, half our floor at any given moment are Israeli citizens that have come here for health care, which I didn't really think much of. I was like, oh, okay. They're flying in. Okay.
It wasn't until I, like, sat down with one of my Israeli patients and she talks me through the whole thing that I realized what was going on. Israeli citizens are given the option. If there's a US hospital that has a procedure that is not offered in Israel or if there's a US hospital that is better at a procedure than a hospital in Israel or if the Israeli organ donation centers don't have a good match for them, they come to the US and receive our organs from our citizens. I don't know how it's happening, but I have a very high suspicion that some of these Israeli citizens are being fast tracked on the wait list for
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is shocking. https://t.co/iHE5CGEWlg
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1992, the speaker attended a Communist Party USA meeting at UC Berkeley and was surprised to find older attendees discussing plans to undermine America from within, focusing on the environmental movement to dismantle the free enterprise system. This strategy aims for global solutions necessitating a global government.
The speaker referenced the book "The Naked Communist," which outlined communist goals from the 1950s, including controlling schools to promote socialism. Communists aim to transition countries to socialism before communism by gaining control and disarming the population.
The speaker claims that many countries fell to communism in the 20th century not through military invasion, but through internal disruption. Agitators stir up unrest, install a puppet leader, and then exert totalitarian control. They target traditional families by undermining the father's role and pushing mothers into the workforce to control the children, as well as brainwashing people against toxic masculinity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back in 1992, an older friend of my father who was from St. Louis asked me to go to this meeting that the Communist Party USA was having at the University of California Berkeley, and he had studied communism and written books about communism back in the sixties and stuff. And he was curious because if you remember back in 1989, the Berlin Wall had come down, and everyone was saying communism is dead. It's over. Then in 91 in December, the Soviet Union dissolved.
And so this is 6 months later, the summer of 92, and the Communist Party USA is having a meeting. So he asked me to go out to this meeting. He said, would you go out there and just see what they're talking about? Because we we won. This thing's over.
And so I went to that. And for 3 days, I sat there in breakout sessions and lectures and and listened to these hardcore communists. And and one thing shocking about it too, I thought it'd be college radical since it was at Berkeley, so I dress like a college radical with some radical t shirt. I walk into the autumn auditorium, there's 14 or 15, 50, 60, 70 year olds with briefcases. And I thought, woah.
This is actually serious. It's not just some radicals. And many of those exact people, as I researched them later, ended up being in Obama's cabinet in 2008. And that's what motivated me to make the movie because I realized, well, these are the people that were at this communist meeting with me back back in 1992. But at that meeting, they laid out this plan how they wanted to take America down from the inside.
They were gonna focus all their energies on that now. They've been focusing on it for a while, but they realized they could never out spend America because capitalism, free enterprise is so successful. And they kind of that woke them up. Okay. We gotta go to plan b.
They they just keep building more and more. And, of course, we had all the years of Reagan where he'd really built the military up, so they realized we're in trouble here. And so that's what they talked about to me and how they were going to do that from the inside. And I didn't think that much about it, went on with my life. But then again, 16 years later in 2008 from 92, when I remembered what they had talked about, like, one thing, that is so clear how to change.
They had said back in 92, we're gonna use the environmental movement to take down the free enterprise system in America. And in 92, that didn't make sense because that was not a big movement. It was literally people, you know, chaining themselves to trees in Oregon so they can't cut them down. I mean, it was nothing. And so I was like, how would you do that?
But in 2008, an Inconvenient Truth by Al Gore had come out. It was the biggest movement in the world and it still is, because they realized it's the ultimate vehicle for totalitarian control because it's a global problem, so it demands global solutions by
Speaker 1: a global government. That's that's the way they look
Speaker 0: at it. So they that's why that issue will never go away no matter how many facts we have and how many charts we can show them. Hey. It's not going up. And if it went up a little bit, actually would be good.
Warm warmth is the friend of life. Cold is the enemy of life. All the logical things that they don't, but from that, I wrote a letter when I was a representative on that communist meeting in 1992, and it just blew up into a huge thing. And one of the men that responded to that and said, what representative Bauer says is true, but it's nothing new. That's not from 1992.
It was all written in a book in 19 58, and I got to know the man. It was, of course, the book The Naked Communist, and it had the 45 current communist goals as of the 19 fifties in America. And I got that book for the first time in 2,008. So 50 years later, and I read through the list of goals. And as I did, I couldn't believe how specific and how purposeful and how premeditated a collapse of our country had been.
It had been people and groups for a 100 years working to take us down from within. And I just I couldn't believe as I read through these things, one of goal 17. This is from fifties America. Get control of the schools, use them as transmission belts for socialism, soften the curriculum. Well, people wonder, why do all the kids want socialism today?
Because in the fifties, they said we gotta put socialist ideas, we gotta push it. So these kids think it's good. They think it's it's wonderful. And so because they know all the hardcore communists know. You have to transition through socialism before you can go to communism.
You cannot go from a prosperous free enterprise system to communism because the problem is in the prosperous free enterprise system, you and all the people own all the stuff. Mhmm. And so they can't it's like, how do we get this? They have the wealth. They have the guns.
They have the property. They have a we gotta transition into socialism where we slowly get control of everything. And then it's easy to flip overnight, especially if you can disarm them. Then overnight, it's no more mister nice guy. You do what we say or you get a bullet in your head.
Mhmm.
Speaker 1: I
Speaker 0: mean, that's that's and that happened over and over again throughout the 20th century. So it's not like some new strategy. That's what they did to most of the countries that fell to communism, and a lot of people don't know this. During the 20th century, like, 65 or 70 countries that fell. That's how they fell.
They did not tanks didn't roll in and take them over. They stirred up their radical, stirred up the college professors to strip the young people for freedom, for for no. You these it's not a just government because it wasn't a perfect government, whatever country. It might have been like Cuba or something. No.
It wasn't a perfect government, but it was pro American. They had a lot of freedom. They were prosperous, but the people there stirred it up and said no. And so when what happens is the communists do that, then they put up their puppet as the guy that's for the people, and the people usually vote that person into power. And then once they get the levers of control, they the iron fist comes out and and, like Casper did, it started slaughtering by the 1,000.
Anyone who resisted in Cuba. They've been brainwashed that toxic masculinity because they knew that's their number one enemy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Back in the 19 thirties, even the Frankfurt School, one of the groups that my movie talks about, they talked about that. They said we're never going to be able to get these children away from the parents in the families where the father is leading the home. They go, we we gotta pull him out. We gotta get him sidetracked on other things, sports or whatever, and then we gotta create enough inflation so the mother has to work whether she wants to or not so we can raise the children. They were writing about that in the 19 thirties.
Speaker 2: And now you have them on the White House podium saying these are our children. Exactly. These are not your children. They're our children.
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: You know, you know, we're
Speaker 2: coming from the White House.
Speaker 0: That's
Speaker 2: right. Legitimately, like, 3 months ago.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. You know, one one thing that I always think back to is why, like, every now and then, you'll see one of these pictures pop up. So this is a picture of, like, a 17 year old in Vietnam. Mhmm. Right?
And, like, knowing that, like, that was that was that was the normal here. Right? Like, just this peak male. Right? Like, I mean, he's 17 year olds.
He's got muscle tone, and he's out fighting a war. You know what I'm saying? Compared to what our 17 year olds look like now. They're dressing up as fur babies and and and furries and stuff. It's like, how do we get there?
Like, and it could, like and to just, you know, for this conversation, it couldn't just be this one way that we got to this place. It's all these different facets on all these different fronts that they've been able to use to get us to exactly where we are right now. And it's not an overnight process. Right? Like, they've been planning this stuff for you.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. For it's been going on in earnest for right at about a100
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Can someone confirm this? https://t.co/CJxfUQv054
Video Transcript AI Summary
A truck driver with two and a half years of experience states that in disaster situations, truckers usually get more loads. He checked a load board called Truck Stop within 125 miles of Asheville, North Carolina, but found no loads. He then searched within 250 miles of Chicago, Illinois, to Asheville, North Carolina, and found only dollar 40 a mile loads that nobody is taking.
He also checked within 250 miles of Nashville, Tennessee, to within 125 miles of Asheville, North Carolina, and found very few loads. He says that he is not a conspiracy theorist, but asks what is going on. He states that brokers have called him asking if he has seen any FEMA loads going to the Carolinas or Georgia, and that there are none. He says that one broker with six years of experience has spoken to other brokers who are saying the same thing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The people in North Carolina, you deserve to hear this. I'm a truck driver. Alright? I have a 53 foot step deck. I've been trucking for about two and a half years.
I have a YouTube channel. You can verify that on baby line hotshot. Usually, in a disaster situation, it is payday for truckers. We look for that hurricane. We look for that ice storm.
There's generators coming to you. There from, there's stuff coming out of military bases. There is excavators, skid steers, bulldozers, tree tree trimming equipment, pumps, like water pumps to pump water out of places that have been flooded. There's no loads on the load board coming to you within a 125 miles of Asheville. It's called truck stop.
This is where I find all my loads. Chicago, Illinois up at the top. Within 250 miles of Chicago is where I'm gonna pick up. The second the second is the, destination. So it goes origin destination.
Watch. See? Drop off location. Let's do city. Yeah.
North Carolina. Click it. Boom. Alright. These are all a dollar 40 a mile loads, a dollar 39.
That was posted yesterday. I mean, there's nothing. There's nothing. These are loads that that you you wouldn't even nobody's taking them. They're just on the load board.
They've been on there since yesterday. You can see it. Right? Let's type in a different city. That's from Chicago.
Let let maybe Tennessee, maybe Nashville is closer and they'd they'd send resources from Nashville, Tennessee. Nashville, Tennessee within 250 miles of Nashville to Asheville, North Carolina within a 125 miles. Let's see. There is that's it. That's all the loads.
That's all the loads that are £28,000 in I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but, I mean, what the hell's going on here? I had brokers call me and tell me, Stu, have you seen any loads going to Asheville or, like, anywhere around the Carolinas, South Carolina, Georgia? Is there any, like, FEMA loads? There's none. 0.
He's been a broker for 6 years, and he's talking to other brokers. They're saying the same thing. What's going on, guys?
@paleochristcon - Andrew Wilson
Hmmmmm makes sense. https://t.co/haQAWx8e4l
Video Transcript AI Summary
The fight rules are clearly biased. Mike Tyson stands to earn more money by losing than winning, and he faces penalties for knocking out Jake Paul in the first round. To maximize his earnings, Tyson must survive all eight rounds without a knockout, and the fight must go to decision. Additionally, Jake Paul selected the judges, which raises concerns about fairness. If I were Tyson, I would just go for the knockout regardless of the rules.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Y'all seen the rules for this fight, bro? This is clearly red. Look at this. But first of all, Mike Tyson's gonna get paid more money to lose than to win. Secondly, he is penalized for knocking out Jake Paul in the 1st round.
He's only gonna get paid a little bit of money if he knocks him out in the 2nd round. But to make the most money, he has to survive all 8 rounds while avoiding knocking Jake out. On top of that, it has to go to decision, but the problem is Jake Paul chose the judges. This is crazy red, bro. If I'm Mike Tyson, I don't give I'm a just knock him out anywhere.
Please. Just do it.
@j00ny369T - Johnny
Anyone else heard or can confirm this? Pretty interesting, if true. https://t.co/nrccL3pczL
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's been more discussion about mysterious booms than I initially thought, extending beyond just Rigby, Idaho. After posting a video about them, a law enforcement friend advised me to remove it and stop discussing the topic. He mentioned that agencies have been instructed to deny, deflect, and diffuse any conversation about these booms. Additionally, a local amateur seismologist who was investigating the phenomenon contacted the news but sadly passed away from a heart attack before his story could air. This raises concerns about the nature of these booms and why they’re being kept quiet. If I stop making videos, you'll understand the reason.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are not supposed to talk about the booms.
Speaker 1: Evidently, there's a lot more booms going around than I first realized. I thought it was just here local to Rigby, Idaho, but it's not. Shortly after posting my video about the booms, I have a law enforcement friend. I'm not gonna say if if it's state level or county level, but he came over to my house and said, hey, Aaron, it'd be a good idea to pull the video you posted about the booms and not talk about it anymore. He didn't tell me if he knew what they were or what they were doing it for, but he says as an agency, they've been told to deny, deflect, and diffuse.
So they don't want it to be talked about. Now I'm not crazy into conspiracy theories, but my officer friend did tell me about a local amateur seismologist that contacted the news and gave him a story about he set up several different seismology detectors around the area and he was gonna run a story on it. And shortly thereafter before they could actually run the story, he had a heart attack and he's gone. So that got me thinking that there's something going on with these booms that we're not supposed to know about. So if I stop making videos guys, you'll know why.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Imagine not even being slightly suspicious? https://t.co/rIjRFlahae
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
Has anyone looked into this? 🧐 https://t.co/GQsZEVIqu6
Video Transcript AI Summary
I wasn't always a Trump supporter, but a turning point came in Butler, Pennsylvania. The day before, an investment group tied to the Bushes and Cheneys sold all their DJT stock, then claimed it was a clerical error. This struck me as suspicious, especially since their only other similar move was selling American Airlines stock before September 11.
It made me realize we're being deceived. Trump, knowing too much and being unpredictable, threatened the establishment. He potentially knows about advanced technology, like zero-point energy, and healing devices, that would disrupt the oil and pharmaceutical industries.
Countries are blackmailing us, leading to vast sums leaving our country. Many voted for Trump hoping he'd expose corruption. Don't blindly trust the media, do your research and don't let them scare you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have never been a Trumper. I have never voted for the guy. But I can tell you the moment that I changed my mind about him, and that was in Butler, Pennsylvania. And it wasn't just because of what happened there. It was because the day before, which was a Friday, the investment group that controls the assets for the Bushes and the Cheney's sold every single bit of their DJT, aka Truth Social, stock.
They sold every single bit of it. And then the following Tuesday, they claimed, oops, that was a clerical error. We would like that back, please. Coincidentally, the only other time that this investment group has sold off all of a stock was in the September, and it was American Airlines stock. Weird.
Right? So that was the first event that made me say, wait. Am I being bamboozled? And the answer to that was, yes. We are all being bamboozled.
We are all being bamboozled. They wanted to get Trump because he knows too much. And he's unpredictable. And they didn't know if he was gonna just keep going along or if he was gonna make a name for himself by exposing the secrets. These secrets, in my opinion, include advanced technology, possibly zero point energy, where we would not need those oil guys anymore, Possibly healing devices where we would not need those pharmaceutical guys anymore who are, by the way, deeply entrenched with the oil guys.
And if you wanna know more about that, just look up the role of ExxonMobil and Monsanto in the Holocaust. Look what they created for Germany during the Holocaust. Just look it up. ExxonMobil and Monsanto, which used to be a company before that, but you'll find it. It is open knowledge.
So start asking the hard questions. Start asking why do I believe what I believe? Is it because I heard it on the media, or is it because I heard it from the horse's mouth? Do your research. That's all I'm saying.
We have been bamboozled. There have been hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars leaving our country because other countries who shall not be named know our secrets too and are blackmailing us. And that is why a lot of people voted for Donald Trump because they really do think he's gonna drain the swamp. They really do think he's gonna go after that corruption and those criminals and the people who've taken our tax dollars and spent in our ridiculous things and laundered it. That's why the establishment didn't want him.
So think for yourselves. Don't believe everything you hear on the news, and don't let anybody make you afraid. That's their strategy. They always try to make us afraid. So as I always say, keep your head on a swivel.
Love you.
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
This is wild. https://t.co/K7J7xp1n7B
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Downtown LA Skid Row, the speaker discusses the homeless situation, stating that in 2023, Gavin Newsom allocated $750,000,000 for tiny homes, and in 02/2019, $24,000,000,000 was designated for the homeless, but the money is unaccounted for. The speaker mentions Nancy Pelosi, who has served since 02/2007 and has a net worth over $120,000,000, and Maxine Waters, serving since 1990 with a net worth over $10,000,000. Gavin Newsom is reportedly building a $9,000,000 home in San Francisco. The speaker claims California's leaders have failed the people of Los Angeles and California, and that over 66,000,000 people have left California in recent years. The speaker criticizes Newsom for hosting a podcast and suggests he may be planning a presidential run in 2028.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm in Downtown LA Skid Row, and I wanna point out a few things that's gone on here in the past few years. In 2023, Gavin Newsom set aside $750,000,000 to build tiny homes for people just like this that are surrounding by me. Somehow that money is gone. In 02/2019, they set aside $24,000,000,000 to go towards the homeless. Somehow that money is gone.
It's unaccounted for. I wanna talk about a few politicians from here. One is Nancy Pelosi. She's been serving these people since 02/2007. Her net worth is over a hundred and 20,000,000.
Another person here, Maxine Waters, she's been serving the people here in California since 1990. Her net worth is over $10,000,000. And Gavin Newsom, who knows what his net worth is? But we know he is building a $9,000,000 home in San Francisco, California. There are leaders.
The leaders of California, they failed these people here in Los Angeles and in California. California has actually been one of the highest states in America that people have fled from. Over 66,000,000 people have left California in the last few years, and yet Gavin Newsom, he's out there holding a podcast, a podcast when he should be working on his state. He might be making a run for it in 2028, and I hope people remember this that's behind me.
@mazemoore - MAZE
Conspiracy theorists were right.https://t.co/78KI7ntFLm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Conspiracy theories arise during public health crises and are distractions. A video alleging masks don't work was removed from social media for spreading misinformation. A study found mask mandates were an utter failure, according to the New York Times, citing a British review of 78 randomized studies. Lockdowns' effect on mortality was basically irrelevant, according to economists from Johns Hopkins, who warned against their future use.
There is absolutely no evidence of an overcount of COVID fatalities, but the LA County health director acknowledged the county may be overcounting COVID deaths by as much as twenty percent. COVID can be a contributing or incidental cause of death.
Initially, Dr. Fauci rejected the theory that coronavirus was man-made in a lab in Wuhan, China, but an intelligence arm of the US Energy Department has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China. The Wuhan Institute of Virology worked on coronaviruses, which some find to be a large coincidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You will always have conspiracy theories when you have, very challenging public health crises. They are nothing but distractions.
Speaker 1: President retweeting a conspiracy video alleging that masks do not work. The video was then removed by Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube because it violated rules against spreading misinformation.
Speaker 2: The second most powerful man in the world revealing himself in this video as a mask truther.
Speaker 3: A major study finding masks made no difference in stopping the spread. Mask mandates, it turns out, were an utter failure. It's not me saying it, but the New York Times. The mask mandates did nothing. Will any lessons be learned?
Brett Stevens cites a comprehensive British review of 78 randomized studies with more than 600,000 participants.
Speaker 4: So that wasn't scientifically fair. Effective. The the mass guidance was
Speaker 5: not It wasn't science based, and the six feet of distancing has was arbitrary.
Speaker 4: All around the country, over the weekend, protests popped up. These morons and Internet conspiracy theories demanding an immediate end to lockdowns. And let's be honest, people. This is both insane and counter productive. Because the more you gather in groups, the longer the lockdown will have to go on.
Did lockdowns during COVID prevent severe effects from COVID nineteen? Did it help in the arc of the pandemic? Economists from Johns Hopkins say no. The report warned against using lockdowns as a pandemic measure in the future because of the low effectiveness on mortality and the consequences for the economy.
Speaker 6: The the lockdowns in terms of their effects on mortality, we measured it against mortality, were were basically irrelevant. They destroyed people. They literally killed people. When you shut down medical care, in spring of twenty twenty alone, there were six hundred and fifty thousand cancer chemotherapy patients in this country alone. Half of them didn't get their chemo because they were afraid.
They were told it was dangerous to go to a medical facility.
Speaker 7: We weighed in on a theory that's been floating around that perhaps the number of fatalities related COVID nineteen is being inflated because people are actually dying of other things. Can what's your read on that theory?
Speaker 0: You know, Savannah, there is absolutely no evidence that that's the case at all. You know, it it I think it falls under the category of something that's very unfortunate, these conspiracy theories that we hear about.
Speaker 8: Even though wackos, Trump wackos are are are doing conspiracy theories saying those numbers are padded.
Speaker 0: What should we say to people who conspiracy theorize about an overcount of the deaths?
Speaker 2: Follow-up now to my conversation with LA County health director Barbara Ferrer who last week acknowledged the county may be overcounting COVID deaths by as much as twenty percent.
Speaker 9: Could it be a secondary contributing cause? So for example, somebody with kidney disease, COVID then pushes them over the edge to have kidney failure. That's COVID as a contributing cause. And then the third is COVID as an incidental finding. So somebody coming in with a gunshot wound or a heart attack, and they happen to test positive.
Speaker 4: Now part of the conspiracy theory is that the disease started in a laboratory in Wuhan.
Speaker 10: Just weeks ago, doctor Anthony Fauci rejected the conspiracy that coronavirus was man made in a lab in Wuhan, China. And yet this week, Donald Trump is still pushing the debunked bunkum.
Speaker 4: A lot of people on the right love that phrase escape from
Speaker 6: the lab because it sounds like something from Marvel movie or comic book.
Speaker 11: Everyone who believes in the conspiracy is saying that it came out of a lab in Wuhan Wuhan rather than, through food at a market.
Speaker 12: And, he continued to push a conspiracy theory that has already been debunked by our intelligence community. This whole notion that the coronavirus was developed in a Chinese lab. That has been debunked.
Speaker 13: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China.
Speaker 12: Is that I don't know who to trust. Yeah. Right? I certainly don't trust reporters Mhmm. Because reporters treated this initially as if it was nothing more than a crazy unhinged conspiracy theory.
Speaker 14: Yeah.
Speaker 12: So who do you trust? Right? You can't trust the legacy media outlets because that was their narrative.
Speaker 11: It came out of the city that has a Wuhan Institute of Virology,
Speaker 8: a Chinese lab that worked on coronaviruses. And that
Speaker 15: is an awfully large coincidence. And and that's what I've thought
Speaker 14: throughout that that was an awfully large coincidence.
@JakeG_Official - JAKEGTV
This deserves scrutiny. https://t.co/p9EvQ2mUlJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donors give money to TP USA. TP USA loans 350,000 of that into a company Charlie owned. That company uses it to buy a premium on a jumbo life insurance policy on Charlie's life. Once he dies, TP USA recoups its loan. The leftover millions go to whoever Charlie named his private beneficiaries.
The payout was somewhere around 20 to 50,000,000 upon his death. The nonprofit pays the premiums now. The family gets paid later. The nonprofit merely recoups its loan. And often, the insured doesn't pay a dime, so the donor money does.
The payout only triggers when the insured passes away. In short, charity money basically becomes a death benefit jackpot for private beneficiaries. The question is who controls the structure. The policy isn't owned by TPUSA. It's owned by a shell company called GGLF twenty twenty three LLC, owned by Charlie Kirk. So the main thing is they didn't run this through TP USA's books. They tucked it away in a Wyoming shell where nobody can easily see who benefits. All this comes from TP USA's own publicly available form 990. So it's a mailbox.
All of these billionaires do this. Trump does this. Epstein did this. They use a trust, and smart people actually do this to keep the government's hands off of your hard earned money. A lot of people do.
Yep. And it's legal. Like I said, you just search it up. This is just their paperwork. It's filed under oath. The shell company formed in May 2023, and that became public only recently, and then Charlie was assassinated.
These people are covering up the truth behind what happened on September 10. And I've heard a lot of people saying, well, I don't believe that Charlie Kirk is dead. I believe that he's secretly alive somewhere.
That's what it's sounding like. And until we see how these were set up, who's profiting from this, then we won't know. And Erica Kirk can absolutely show us, but they don't seem like they wanna show us anything.
It's gonna continue to happen where people are gonna speculate, well, is Charlie Kirk privately sitting on an island somewhere with 20 to 50,000,000 and we don't see the kids because they're with him?
Right.
People are gonna continue to say that. If these people do not become transparent and start saying the truth, then how can they fault anyone for speculating? Because what we do know is that they're lying.
So, of course, we're going to do our research. We're going to look into things. We're going to investigate. We're going to come to our own relevant conclusions. And if they are right or wrong or indifferent, we won't we'll never know because these people won't just tell us the truth because they are liars and frauds, they're the profiteers of Charlie's death on September 10.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, basically, donors give money to TP USA. TP USA loans 350 k of that into a company Charlie owned. That company uses it to buy a premium on a jumbo life insurance policy on Charlie's life. Once he dies, TP USA, they recoup its loan. The leftover millions go to whoever Charlie named his private beneficiaries.
Speaker 1: And the payout was what upon his death?
Speaker 0: Somewhere around 20 to $50,000,000 payout. The nonprofit pays the premiums now. The family gets paid later. The nonprofit merely recoups its loan. And often, the insured doesn't pay a dime, so the donor money does.
The payout only triggers when the insured passes away. So in short, charity money basically becomes a death benefit jackpot for private beneficiaries. And so who controls the structure? I mean, that's the biggest question. The policy isn't owned by TPUSA.
It's owned by a shell company called GGLF twenty twenty three LLC, owned by Charlie Kirk. So the main thing is they didn't run this through Teep USA's books. They tucked it away in a Wyoming shell where nobody can easily see who benefits. And all this comes from Teep USA's own publicly available form nine ninety. So it's a mailbox.
It's not a real office, and, you know, it's it's commonly used for anonymous entities.
Speaker 1: So All of these billionaires do this. Trump does this. Epstein did this. They use a trust, and smart people actually do this to keep the government's hands off of your hard earned money. A lot of people do
Speaker 0: Yep. And it's legal. Like I said, you just search it up. This is just their paperwork. It's filed under oath.
The Shell company formed in May 2023, and that became public only recently, and then Charlie was assassinated.
Speaker 1: These people are covering up the truth behind what happened on September 10. And I've heard a lot of people saying, well, I don't believe that Charlie Kirk is dead. I believe that he's secretly alive somewhere.
Speaker 0: That's what it's sounding like. And until we see how these were set up, who's profiting from this, then we won't know. And Erica Kirk can absolutely show us, but they don't seem like they wanna show us anything.
Speaker 1: It's gonna continue to happen where people are gonna speculate, well, is Charlie Kirk privately sitting on an island somewhere
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: With 20 to $50,000,000 and we don't see the kids because they're with him?
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: People are gonna continue to say that. If these people do not become transparent and start saying the truth, then how can they fault anyone for speculating? Because what we do know is that they're lying.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: So, of course, we're going to do our research. We're gonna look into things. We're going to investigate. We're going to come to our own relevant conclusions. And if they are right or wrong or indifferent, we won't we'll never know because these people won't just tell us the truth because they are liars and frauds, they're the profiteers of Charlie's death on September 10.
@5149jamesli - James Li
Allegedly allegedly allegedly… 😏 https://t.co/KMuY4cwKhn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on allegations that Erica Kirk’s backstory has been exposed as a lie. The speakers claim that, while she lived in New York, there are indications she did date and drink, contrasting with statements that she avoided dating and did not drink. One concrete example cited is a photo of Erica Fronsbee with a glass of champagne, captioned “it’s Wednesday, so treat yourself to little champagne,” suggesting she did enjoy alcohol.
Further evidence presented includes a 2017 image posted by internet sleuths showing Erica Fronsbee with Cabot Phillips, captioned, “yes. we’re that couple who gets painting lessons together.” The image is interpreted as indicating they were more than just a one-off date, implying they were an actual couple. The speakers note that Cabot Phillips was at one point Charlie Kirk’s producer and is now a senior editor at The Daily Wire. They add that Phillips recently spoke about “how to lead like Charlie,” and that the speaker believes Phillips “is not from this world of media,” describing the situation as “incestuity.”
The narrative is broadened to claim that Erica was dating before Charlie, which is described as normal, but there is also mention of her being engaged, perhaps even married. Luna Bear Studios is cited with a post from 03/16/2015, praising Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, stating, “Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, you both are amazing humans, and I love shooting you so much laughter and love. It was perfection.” This is used to argue that her entire image is built on something not true.
A recurring question posed is why Erica would lie about being a conservative woman, with the assertion that such deception would be visible online, concluding that “the Internet is undefeated.” The speakers imply that Erica’s public persona as a conservative woman is inconsistent with the alleged past relationships and activities documented in the posts and photos. The overall claim is that there are contradictions between her claimed identity and her dating and social media history, challenging the authenticity of her presented backstory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Erica Kirk's backstory has just been exposed as a giant lie, allegedly.
Speaker 1: When I lived out here, I was here for five years. I never dated here because I saw vicariously through my roommate how terrible it was. I just I don't drink. I find it unproductive.
Speaker 0: We don't know for sure if she wasn't drinking, but she did really enjoy posing with alcoholic beverages. Here's her with a glass of champagne. Says, it's Wednesday, so treat yourself to little champagne. And does she really not date while she lived in New York City? Well, here is a photo that the Internet sleuths dug up from September 2017 with one Cabot Phillips, and the caption said, yes.
We're that couple who gets painting lessons together. And here you could see Erica Fronsbee and Cabot Phillips. I don't know about you, but that looked like a little bit more than just a one off date. It looked like they were an actual couple, as the caption said. But interestingly, Cabot Phillips was actually at one point Charlie Kirk's producer, and he's now a senior editor at The Daily Wire.
And just yesterday, 12/16/2025, he gave a talk about, quote, how to lead like Charlie. You gotta understand. I am not from this world of media, and I think all this kind of incestuity is weird to me. So not only do we now know that she was dating before Charlie, which is fine. It's a totally normal thing to do, but she was also engaged, perhaps even married.
Luna Bear Studios posted this on 03/16/2015, prepping another couple's gallery for delivery. Erica Fransvi and JT Massey, you both are amazing humans, and I love shooting you so much laughter and love. It was perfection. This is what happens when your entire image is propped up by something that just is not true. If you are not this woman, don't pretend to be.
But the bigger point is why does Erica have to lie about this? Is it just for her to prop up this image that she is a conservative woman, quote unquote? Because you can't hide this kind of stuff. The Internet is undefeated.
@LionelMedia - 🇺🇸Lionel🇺🇸
This can't be true, can it? https://t.co/OZmdGRd35Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether the other is maintaining that there were no planes that hit the World Trade Center. Speaker 1 clarifies that this is not the claim they are making; rather, there is no significant wreckage from a large Boeing crash at any of the four events. This framing emphasizes a distinction between the presence of aircraft impact and the apparent absence of substantial debris.
Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 saw the videotape that others saw, prompting a response that encourages a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower. Speaker 1 asserts that what you will see is a “fake, a cartoon display,” arguing that an aluminum airplane cannot pass through a building like the South Tower as if it were thin air. In other words, Speaker 1 contends that the footage demonstrates a simulated or cartoon-like depiction rather than a real-time account of an aircraft penetrating the structure.
Following this, Speaker 0 probes whether Speaker 1 is suggesting that the news media was involved in this fabrication, indicating a belief that media sources contributed to the apparent display. Speaker 1 affirms the suggestion by stating “Yes,” and notes that there was only one so-called real-time film, adding that “we don’t really understand how they did that.” This introduces a claim of media involvement and a mystery surrounding the production of the visible footage, implying manipulation or concealment of the true events.
The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 mentioning that there are “video ex” (likely beginning to refer to video evidence or explanations) but the thought is cut off, leaving an incomplete reference to further material or evidence that would support the previous claims about the nature of the footage and the method by which it was produced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, you say, for example, that there that there were no planes that hit the the the World Trade Center. Is that is that your contention?
Speaker 1: No. What I say is that there were no air a big Boeing crashes at every all four events. There's no significant wreckage, for example.
Speaker 0: Well, did you see the videotape that the rest of us saw?
Speaker 1: Sure. And I encourage everybody to, do a a frame by frame penetration of the South Tower, and what you will see is a fake, a cartoon display. Because a plane cannot an aluminum plane cannot go through a building like the a the South Tower was as if it were thin air.
Speaker 0: You're saying right through. You're suggesting if that there's some kind of cartoon animation there, you're suggesting that the news media was a part of this. Yes, sir. Came from the news media.
Speaker 1: Yes. Well, there was only one so called real time, film, and, we don't really understand how they did that. There are video ex
@HorrorGorl - Tired Peasant
Maybe this guy was telling the truth…. https://t.co/KAgWMBQZLe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 states that the Andromedans have 1,833 individuals living underground between 100 and 200 miles beneath the surface. They have lifespans of thousands of years, are carnivorous, and are not friendly to mankind, at least the ones that are here. They eat living humans, not dead ones, with a preference for children. They claim there are other groups who say not to talk about the reptilians, but Speaker 1 says otherwise. According to the Andromedans, these beings are responsible for 31,712 children disappearing in the last twenty-five years from the United States, and these children were food. Speaker 1 adds that 3,000 children in Westchester County, New York have vanished in the last five years, asking why this is happening and why people remain in denial.
Speaker 0 asks how these beings are able to come up from underground and do this. Speaker 1 explains that they have cooling systems everywhere that are aided by the Grays, and there are groups within the higher echelon that help them acquire this. In addition, human beings abduct the kids and get them to the Grey Zoo, which in turn hands them to the Alpha drug contest, as part of the deal. They won’t come up as long as humans feed them down there. Speaker 1 reiterates that it’s about human beings selling themselves out, describing the echelon attitude as the needs of the few outweighing the needs of humanity, and that this is not right.
Speaker 0 comments that humanity will have to rise up and take a stand, suggesting people turn off their televisions, get in their cars, and fire everyone in Washington, DC who knows and does nothing. They argue that apathy must end, or the way we live will end. They emphasize that they are not speaking from a fear space, but from anger about the apathy. Speaker 1 complains that lectures try to tell people, but others want to stand up and fight; indications are everywhere, saying the truth is now an obscure thing and the lie is the norm. Speaker 0 apologizes for seeming crazy, and Speaker 1 reassures that they are not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the Andromanans tell you that the Alfred Garrisonians are here now. Where There
Speaker 1: are 1,833 of them that have been living underground between one hundred and two hundred miles beneath the surface. They've been here some of them have been here a long, long time. They have lifespans that are thousands of years. They're carnivorous. They are not friendly to mankind.
At least the ones that are here.
Speaker 0: Are you saying canoe is that eat humans? Yes.
Speaker 1: And they need to be they won't eat a dead human. It has to be alive at the time of the killing. Their preference is children. You know? And we've been told we've been told, you shouldn't talk about that.
You know? There are other people who say, well, you better not talk about the reptilians. Well, you know, bull. You know? Why not?
According to the Andromedans, they're responsible for 31,712 children disappearing in the last twenty five years from The United States. These children were food. And I'm supposed to just shut up and not say anything about it because people don't wanna hear it. That's tough. That's tough.
You know, Westchester County, in the last five years, 3,000 children in Westchester County, New York have vanished without a trace. Where are they going? Why are we allowing this to happen? And why should people stay in denial about it?
Speaker 0: Now how are they able to do this? How are they able to how are they able to do it? How are they able to come up out of this from underground and do it? Do they have There
Speaker 1: cooling systems everywhere that are being helped by the Grays and also there are groups within the higher echelon that are actually helping them acquire this.
Speaker 0: So human beings are abducting the kids and getting them to the Grey Zoo in turn give them to the
Speaker 1: Alpha drug contest. That's right. That's part of the deal. They won't come up as long as we feed them down there. You understand?
It's about human beings selling themselves out. The echelon attitude here, the needs of the few outweigh the needs of humanity. And sorry, that just isn't right. You know? But it's gonna have to be humanity that's gonna rise up and take the stand.
You're just gonna have to turn off your televisions. They're gonna have to get in their car. They're gonna have to fire everybody in Washington DC that knows and does nothing, and they're gonna have to do something. You know, this apathy's gotta end. Otherwise, the way we live is gonna end.
Period. I mean, that's the bottom line. You know? And and I'm not coming from a fear space. I'm really quite angry about the apathy and the fact that, you know, when people give lectures and try to tell them, people wanna stand up and fight with them.
Look at what's happening around us. The indications are everywhere. Everywhere. The truth is now an obscure thing. You know, the lie is the norm.
There's something wrong here. What's wrong with this picture?
Speaker 0: Sorry if I'm getting crazy. No. You're not. You're you're express