reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 7:03 PM

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

ARE THEY LYING TO US ABOUT SUNLIGHT? DON’T WE NEED VITAMIN D? https://t.co/syvewe1zbB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sunlight has been found to reduce the size of internal cancerous tumors. However, there is a belief that too much sun exposure can cause cancer. A study conducted at Baylor University compared two groups of animals. One group was fed a standard American diet, while the other group received a highly nutritious diet. Both groups were exposed to ultraviolet rays. The results showed that 25% of the animals on the standard American diet developed skin cancer, while none of the animals on the highly nutritious diet did. This suggests that our diet plays a role in the development of skin cancer, which is a relatively new phenomenon compared to our ancestors who spent a lot of time outdoors without getting skin cancer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You all about sunlight and its benefits. Sunlight reduces the size of internal cancerous tumors. How much sun causes cancer? Well, actually says stay out of the sun because it causes cancer. They did a study at Baylor University where they took 2 groups of experimental animals. They gave one the standard American diet, Which is terrible. They gave the other one a highly nutritious diet. Then they exposed both groups of animals to the ultraviolet rays of the sun. In the group on the standard American diet, 25% got skin cancer. In the group on the highly nutritious diet, not 1 animal got skin cancer. It's the way we're eating. Skin cancer is a relatively new phenomenon in the last 60 years or so, and yet our ancestors for 100 of years have been living outdoors, working outdoors, And they didn't get skin cancer. It's a new phenomenon.
Saved - January 12, 2024 at 11:32 AM

@TNTJohn1717 - PaulsCorner21

The benefits of the sun…they don’t want you to know… https://t.co/LHx3yRVqv5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the benefits of sunlight, including its positive effects on heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, blood sugar, lactic acid levels, energy, strength, endurance, stress tolerance, and the blood's ability to absorb and carry oxygen. They question the use of petroleum-based SPF products that block these benefits and emphasize the importance of sunlight for our overall health. The speaker also mentions the influence of marketing in promoting these products. They recommend a book called "Health and Light" for further information on the healing properties of light.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The benefits of the sun include decreasing resting heart rate, decreased blood pressure, decreased respiratory rate, decreased blood sugar, decreased lactic acid in the blood. Lactic acid is very toxic against the blood. We know it leads to the illness with a big c, increased energy and strength and endurance, increased tolerance to stress, increased ability of the blood to absorb and carry oxygen. That's all from the sun. So why would we take SPF, which is a petroleum based toxin, rub it all over our body, and block out the ability for the sun to heal our body if those are all the benefits. Especially the last one, increases ability of the blood to absorb and carry oxygen. Without oxygen, you just you just die. That's it, like, straight up. How does that make any sense at all? Marketing plays a big role. There are 1,000,000,000 of dollars of marketing telling you to rub that nonsense all over your skin because it's going save you from the sun, which is giving you all of these benefits. How does that make any sense at all? You know, this is just a great book. If anybody wants to look into the healing properties of light, this is a great book. You can also add Health and Light by doctor John
Saved - February 18, 2024 at 8:26 PM

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ALWAYS MAKE PEOPLE FEAR THE SUN? https://t.co/UszPly4OfT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sungazing is a practice that may reduce stress and improve health by gazing at the sun during sunrise or sundown for a 5-minute window. Benefits reported include absorbing beneficial light rays. Research before attempting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Health boss. Did you know that there's a practice called sungazing that's been shown to reduce stress and improve your overall health? Now, of course, although these are limited, people have reported a multitude of benefits. Now the way it works is that there's a brief window of time that you have to capture during sun rise or sundown. And the belief is while staring at the sunrise or the sundown for that 5 minute window, you will gaze, and then you will reap all the benefits of absorbing the light rays that shouldn't harm your eyes. So before going out and just staring at the sun, do your own research. Help us. You know where to find
Saved - February 21, 2024 at 8:44 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

The globalists are Chemtrail Spraying you every day with heavy metal nano-particulates https://t.co/4PWtBoCHO5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The former CIA director discussed geoengineering methods like stratospheric aerosol injection to combat climate change. Some believe chemtrails are part of a secret project, while others see geoengineering as a solution. Reports show toxic pesticides in soil samples worldwide, affecting insect populations. Spanish authorities admit to spraying chemicals to combat global warming and COVID-19. Critics argue against manipulating the carbon cycle, essential for all life on Earth. Geoengineering continues despite concerns over its long-term effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was the CIA director at the time. 7 years ago, John Brennan, admitting the giant geoengineering chemtrail program. Speaker 1: Another example is the array of technologies often referred to collectively as geoengineering that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10,000,000,000 yearly. As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects such as ocean acidification because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. On the geopolitical side, the technology's potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world at the expense of other regions could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Speaker 0: That's right. Changing your weather changes somebody else's weather. So we have that backdrop here, and we have this London Guardian article. My month with chemtrail conspiracy theorist. Tammy Reid and her partner are insane. They believe there's a secret project when all it is is ice crystals from condensation. Now those fade away in a few minutes, and then we get all of this. Bill Gates venture aims to spray dust into the atmosphere to block the sun. What could go wrong? Forbes. Controversial spraying method aims to curb global warming. CBS News. Geoengineering marked scientific gangs and UN report on dire climate future. They've gotta do it for our own good. On Guardian, what if it's too late to save our planet without geoengineering? So the Guardian says it doesn't exist. You're bad out of one article and then says it exists and it's good out of another. Science.org. Geoengineers inch closer to sun dimming balloon test. Geoengineering, the quick and and potentially catastrophic fix for climate change. ABC News Australia. Here's what scientists really think about chemtrails. Huffington Post. They're real. They're good for you. And then NBC News. Do airplane contrails add to climate change? Yes. And the problem is about to get worse. I mentioned this CIA director on the geopolitical risk of climate geoengineering, which is ongoing. And the stacks go on and on and on, but what's the new information? We already knew this. They had guessed on years ago that the test, and we've got samples of soil all over the world, but particularly the US, from Oregon to New York, from Florida to Texas, and they found very toxic, extremely poisonous pesticides that kill everything, plant, animal, amphibian, fish, insect that comes in contact with, and you wonder why they've been in mainstream news. Where are all the insects or the windshield test? I drove just a few months ago in the spring in Texas to our historic family land in East Texas. In our hands, it's the late 18 twenties. And normally when I travel in the spring, particularly, I stop 3 times with a squeegee at gas stations and clean the dead bugs off, and the radiator is just covered with dead bugs. No bugs. No bugs. No bugs. If the bugs are dying, what's that mean? See, they're not just killing the evil humans we've all been taught to hate, how bad we are, how guilty we are, turn our life force against ourselves. They are killing the whole planet. So here's National Spanish news. The Spanish meteorological agency has confessed that Spain is being sprayed with lead dioxide, silver, iodine, and diatomite, and it and more. And it goes on to say that they are spraying with UN authorization in the in in the EU biocides biocides. And look up biocides, a pesticide that kills life. And they say in the press release, it's right here in Spanish, that it's being done to stop global warming. So pesticides stop global warming. Oh, but wait. It gets better. It gets a lot better. They go on to say that it's also to stop COVID. And there's another little problem here. They talk in documents about stopping COVID in 2019. That's their cover for the whole thing. I suggest you go read it. Here's Reuters. Geoengineering marks scientific gain and UN report on dire climate future. Only this can save us. But don't debate it while it's been going on for decades. Secretly, controversial spring method aims to curb a little warming, CBS News. And then we have house republicans introduce climate change strategy with eye on midterms. Oh, they admit it's real, but they've got a better way to cut the evil carbon dioxide that plants breathe. It is a declaration of war against the building blocks of all life on this planet, carbon based life forms. And the carbon cycle of sunlight, water, carbon dioxide, and oxygen. And you take out carbon dioxide and you collapse the planet. I can pull up head
Saved - April 8, 2024 at 2:57 AM

@FredDiBiase247 - 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 ①

We are being poisoned & drugged through our food. Must Watch👇🏽👇🏽 https://t.co/00Ej8jF2f7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ultra processed food is designed to be addictive and not filling, leading to overconsumption. The rise in calorie intake is linked to increased consumption of ultra processed foods, which are engineered to make us eat more. This has created a mass addiction crisis, with parents unknowingly feeding their kids harmful foods. To address this, we need to reduce ultra processed food consumption by removing corrupt nutrition researchers and advisors. This will prevent companies from manipulating our food choices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ultra processed food is weaponized. Ultra processed food is a science experiment. Ultra processed food is not the free market at work. It is a rigged system where tens of thousands of scientists, as the cigarette industry declined in the 19 eighties, went to food companies. And you literally have food companies today as one of the biggest employers of scientists in the world. They are doing science experiments to make this food addictive and to make it not filling. And that's what we're giving to our kids. That's the problem with ultra processed food. You know, you got a lot of the evidence based bros saying, well, no. No. It's the calories. Calories have gone up in the past 30 years. Well, why have calories gone up? Because it's gone up with ultra processed food consumption, which is weaponized to make us eat more. We know how to regulate our calories. It's like, no. No. It's not the problem. It's not ultra processed food. The problems that it's the one and the same. We're being poisoned and we're being addicted, and we have a mass drug addiction crisis here. And we literally have the characteristics of addiction denial from parents who are addicted to these foods and giving them to their kids is because they're normalized. The root of the promise ultra processed food. The foundation of public policy should be firing every nutrition researcher in the country, letting go of all the corrupt USDA advisors. Everyone. One policy. Get ultra processed food consumption down because as ultra processed food consumption goes down, scientists and these companies aren't able to weaponize our
Saved - April 27, 2024 at 11:33 AM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

Climate change is a cover for geo-engineering. They are spraying our skies with chemical aerosols. Our skies are being heavily polluted with aluminum, barium, lead, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium, silver, nano particles, graphene and more. https://t.co/idbKtap6X1

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are just beginning to research the effects of aluminum. There are concerns about the damaging effects of aluminum found worldwide. Some believe geoengineering agendas may have ulterior motives beyond addressing global warming. The debate continues on the need for global governance in geoengineering activities. The possibility of intervening in the climate system by putting particles in the stratosphere is being considered, but caution is advised to prevent negative consequences like ozone destruction. The motivations behind such actions could vary, including financial gain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And publish nothing. Illumina, we've only begun to research and publish nothing. Speaker 1: Dane looked at him and he said, so you're telling me that spraying 10 to 20 megatons of aluminum, as you said, would have no human health effects. He took a deep breath, and he swallowed, and he said, let me be more careful here. We haven't done Speaker 0: anything serious on alumina, and so there could be something terrible that we'll find tomorrow we haven't looked at. Speaker 1: And that, for me, that was the whole main point of of what is is gonna be coming out to the public. It's it's the damaging effects of aluminum that are being found around the world in massive amounts. Here's David aluminum, and so there could be something terrible that we'll find tomorrow we haven't looked at. Speaker 0: Mhmm. And Illumina, and so there could be something terrible that we'll find tomorrow we haven't looked at. Speaker 2: They're proceeding because they have an agenda that's separate from trying to thwart this crisis of global warming. You know, there's there's obviously several other objectives, whether depopulation, control, weapons aspects, communications aspects, all kinds of things, you know, wildcards that we know nothing about. We don't really know, and I'm not gonna attempt to speculate on exactly what the agendas are, but we can see clearly they're not, they're not the agendas are not benefiting mankind. You know? It's benefiting the agenda of the elite. Speaker 3: And so I think the question is, how do you draw the line between some activity, that is allowed and doesn't need global governance and activities that do require global governance? Doctor John Holdren has agreed to serve as assistant to Speaker 4: the president for science and technology and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. I look forward to his wise counsel in the years ahead. Speaker 3: My personal opinion is that we have to keep geoengineering on the table. We have to look at it very carefully because we might get desperate enough to want to use it. So what would we do if in year 2040 or 2060, there's a severe climate crisis, say, widespread famines or Greenland sliding suddenly into the ocean, that the only plausible way in which we could start the Earth cooling this century is to directly intervene in the climate system, say, by putting particles in the stratosphere. Speaker 5: We do stuff in the stratosphere all the time, of course. And so it's not as though the stratosphere is absolutely pristine. But you don't want to have people going off and doing things that involve large radiative forcings or go on for extended periods or for that matter provide lots of reactive surfaces that could, result in significant ozone destruction. Speaker 3: You know, maybe I'm putting a particle into the atmosphere because I'm trying to make money or maybe I'm putting a part
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 7:01 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨🌎 “Cloud Seeding is booming” “They anticipate at least an additional 200 Ground Cloud Seeding machines to be put in before next season” Are you missing The Sun Yet? Lack of Vitamin D anyone? https://t.co/61fiSc97oT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cloud seeding is expanding with 200 more machines planned. Research shows chemicals used are safe. Manipulating nature is not new, like building parking lots. Monitoring effects on people downstream is important as programs grow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cloud seeding is booming. They anticipate at least another 200 ground cloud seeding machines to be put in before next season. Ginger, this is such Speaker 1: a cool concept, but is it too good to be true? I mean, how do we know that the chemicals that they're spraying from the air aren't bad for us or the planet? Speaker 0: The good news is we've been doing this since 19 forties fifties. Other countries do it, and there Speaker 1: have been a lot of research projects that have shown that Speaker 0: the silver iodide, for example, is not found. It's negligible once it gets down to ground level. Speaker 1: So, again, I don't wanna be too skeptical, but is there anything wrong with manipulating nature like this? I think that's the question we should have asked when we built every single parking lot and every roof top. We have been manipulating weather with our us Speaker 0: for a very long time. I do think that looking at and continuing research on when these programs get bigger, if it will affect people downstream, that needs to be watched. Speaker 1: Elise, we're manipulating it now to help the planet.
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 8:29 PM

@truthscant - AntiCensorship

Just who gives Bill Gates the right to create a 'geo-engineered' cloud, to tackled the alleged problem of 'climate change'? We need Vitamin D We want the sun The sun is good Seriously - I think this man needs to be challenged https://t.co/zRg2U39jkJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates supports a high-altitude experiment for solar geoengineering to cool the Earth by injecting light-reflecting particles into the stratosphere. This controversial method mimics a volcanic eruption but poses risks like famine, flooding, and weakened monsoons. It could impact crop production and visibility by creating a hazy, white sky.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill Gates is backing the 1st high altitude experiment of one radical climate change solution, creating a massive chemical cloud that could cool the Earth. It's called solar geoengineering, and it's highly controversial. Speaker 1: How long will it be that countries keep experiencing these climate impacts before someone gets desperate and says, hey. We need to cool the planet with solar geoengineering. Speaker 0: It would look something like this. Thousands of planes would fly very high and use nozzles to inject millions of tons of light reflecting particles into the stratosphere. It would create a thin chemical cloud of those particles around the whole planet, blocking some sunlight from reaching the surface. It would mimic a giant volcanic eruption, which we know cools the earth. But it also comes with significant risks and uncertainties. Speaker 1: Things like mass famine, mass flooding, drought, of kinds that will affect very large populations. Speaker 0: It could weaken monsoons in India, China, and Africa enough to affect crops. It could eradicate blue sky. Speaker 1: You start increasing the amount of diffuse light, and you have less direct light, which is the same thing as saying it looks hazy and white.
Saved - May 31, 2024 at 6:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Incredible H.A.A.R.P. frequency waves over Ireland. We must not get lazy in our efforts to fight against those controlling us. 2024 is predicted to be a year of storms, and we must pay attention. The elites find pleasure in our suffering. We need to unite and fight against the weather manipulation technologies being used. Professor David Keith is a heartless evil human being for poisoning the earth. We must put down the hypnosis devices and stand against the corporate corrupt government. Commercial Fisherman is accepting donations to help fight against these issues.

@Real1FisherMan - Real Fishing Life🆘🐟🦐🦈🐳🌊🌎✝️🇺🇸🇳🇴

🙏Lord have mercy on us!🆘 🛰️Incredible H.A.A.R.P. Frequency Waves over Ireland like I've never seen before! ⛓️They have everything in place now! All the Right Politicians, all the Right Technology and They have Us at each other's throats, We argue about everything, instead of fighting the Ones Controlling Us! Everything is going just as they have planned!👿 😴We must not get lazy in our efforts to keep fighting these evil people! Because their fight against us has just begun!🔥 🔎 Undeniable Something Fishy is going on here! 😓2024 The Year of The Storms! 🌪️ Fire, Floods, Drought, Wind! I am so Scared for the Human Race and what is about to happen to Us and so few of Us are even paying Attention!☠️ This will make World War II look like just another day at the Roman Coliseum! Because, We are now again at the time, Again! Where the Elites only get Pleasure, by Our Suffering!🆘 🕺I am here, just trying to save your life, from the most Powerful Weapon on the Planet! Their, Weather! Please Help Us Fight to Save the Planet!!! 🆘 👀Everybody must watch the Video all the way through, until the End!👇 🥷We must keep it up Warriors! These Geoengineering Weather Control Operations are so large now, it is undeniable what is going on!☠️https://youtu.be/KS_6BIK0j34?si=L8RWRf4Ac7zCCsEC… 🙏Want to Welcome all the New Warriors to Our Platform!⚔️I have Spent Hours Searching for You All! Sharing My Videos & My Message to Platforms, All over Twitter, looking for the Warriors, that still Cares about this Planet!🌎https://youtu.be/hcYkv9wZ-fE?si=aGGa4aZnv3_aixvZ… 🥷We have shown Unbelievable Evidence of Their(Mad Scientist) Technologies in all of Our Videos,🧑‍🔬They(Mad Scientist) used to Create these Storms! The Chemtrails Sprayed in Our Atmosphere and how Toxic is! How it's Destroying All Life, From the Ocean, to the Birds, to the Bugs!https://youtu.be/GINjqj_9EBo 📵We must put down the Hypnosis Devices, Mad Scientist have Created for Us to be Deceived, Divided, and Distracted! We have No Choice!⚔️We Must Unite and Fight these Lunatics that are Controlling every Aspect of Our Lives! https://youtu.be/uNR4a2ZoHDM?si=PWhRQaBJAYk1cy0e… 🎣Commercial Fisherman, Standing By! We Must Realize, We are Under Hypnosis!https://youtu.be/XIAXuxoSjo8 👮OUR Uniformed Personnel! Must Stand With The People! Not The Corporate Corrupt Government(Mad Scientist)! We Have Today!🆘👇https://youtu.be/OP3VMFHgFxk 🎣Real Fishing Life is now accepting Donations, from the Warriors that would like to Help Create Funding for Equipment & to Help Keep the Lights on!💡 Even a Dollar Donation💸 can make a Difference!🙏❤️ https://givesendgo.com/GBNU1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses chemtrails and frequency waves seen over various locations, expressing concern about the impact on people. They mention the control of technology and the need to stand up against fear and manipulation by powerful families. The speaker plans to focus on California and the heavy spraying observed there, emphasizing the importance of awareness and independent thinking. They also touch on personal experiences and the prevalence of chemtrails in Tennessee. The speaker urges listeners to stay vigilant and informed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, Freedom Fighters. It is 10:10 AM EST. It's 10:10 PM Philippines time, where my dad lives, and 6:10 AM Alaska time where I cannot wait to get back to. Oh, I must say I've never seen nothing like that Speaker 1: that is over my native country of Ireland. Speaker 0: I am Irish and Norwegian. And, God, have mercy. They're tearing us apart. What is that doing to the people? I was hoping HD they would give us where I could go through it, but it's just one day at Speaker 1: a time, and this is this crap that they don't give us any of our technology. We pay for AM, PM. I don't know. Speaker 0: To change my channel, it's still there. How long was that going on standby? Well, I was gonna start on the heavy chemtrailing off Oregon and Washington, but, we'll get back to that. We'll see what we can see as we go across here real quick. That looks like a little pocket of concentrated spraying. Speaker 1: Yep. Spraying right here. I'll go over that again later. Very distinct. Speaker 0: Over Kansas. Come on, computer. Work right. And all of that spraying, they need that to reenergize these atmosphere for these evening storms, I'd Speaker 1: imagine. Very frequent sea waves over the gulf. New storms are already forming. It's actually the leftover from yesterday. Chemical fallout must be unreal, but I wanna go over to Ireland. Speaker 0: Let's see what we see here as we go. Massive frequency waves was put in the last few hours as we go to Ireland to look at their massive frequency waves. It's the satellites, guys, and working with the next red radar systems and your cell phone towers. They're all together. Look at these cell phone towers. Only the bottom part is cell phone. That stuff on top is not for us. Speaker 1: Alright. Is Speaker 0: that a glitch? I wanna see it's more like a glitch. There it is. A glitch or something that's gone through there, but it looks like glitches in their computer. Just like looking at the bottom machine, trying to figure out if that's a rock or sponge. Speaker 1: But, we are looking for Arlen. I went too far. Let's see if we can see all these massive frequency waves that HD is showing the day before, so I gotta go. I think it's the 24th. I mean, the 20 yeah. The day before 28th. So it's on the 28th. Speaker 0: Put it in motion. Kinda gotta use both platforms to piece everything together, and I really hate they won't let me do a time lapse with the HD that just shows you how much control they have over our stuff. We helped put all of them satellites up there. I want y'all to realize that in the beginning at least. What kind of machine doing that? It's nothing offshore. It's gotta just be direct energy from these Speaker 1: Alright. There's the worst part. Alright. Speaker 0: I got these smaller segments. This is the, Ireland segment. Maybe I'll move out a little bit, but that is unbelievable, whatever that is. We're being shadowbanned, so the only way I can get maybe to more people is just make more and more videos. But, man, it's consuming so much of my time. And once I start working again, I won't have the time Speaker 1: or the fight as much as I will be working 15 hour days soon here. Well, y'all won't see much of me except for fishing videos and chemtrails above my head, but y'all won't see no reports. Not much. Maybe every few days. I think we got a 3 day where we work 3 days to start with, so it might get a little bit of time. K. Everything's so slow. It's already dark over here where everybody thinks we're on some kinda weird flat planet. This is, archives. Sorry about that. But, yeah, it's gonna be getting dark here. Where is the dark? Not quite there yet. It's a common, though. Speaker 0: It is dark in India. Very much dark, and where my dad lives too. Alright. I'm getting off topic. I just want everybody to know the truth that I see. I mean, I know how the moon works, the tide works. I mean, that's been going on for 1,000,000,000 of years, especially these lunatics controlling our well, the 100 of years anyhow. These families have been controlling us for 100 years. The Rothschilds, the Morgans, Speaker 1: Rockefellers, The same people, same family, same grandson. It ain't that many people we gotta take out. We just gotta stand up and Speaker 0: not be scared. We can rebuild everything the way we want it instead of being terrified all the time. They put the fear in us. Got you scared of the bugs, colds, sniffles. I don't go to the doctor for anything. I need to have a cyst removed from my neck. But other than that, I don't want none of their fake medicine that's designed to kill you or control you. They killed my grandma. They said she had cancer, and she didn't. The doctor lost his job, but I didn't get my grandma back. Speaker 1: These people are just humans that can be accepted to greed. Speaker 0: God, the chemtrailing today is unreal. My next segment's gonna be California. I'm doing everything in segments today, and this is just a ramble. This is me off to see what they did to Ireland. Speaker 1: Y'all gotta realize that that is not natural, and we're in deep trouble here. That looks like chemtrails. Heavy spraying in Canada today. Looks like let me go back 6 hours. Speaker 0: Gotta be aware of tribal mentality. Most people's hung out with people, so you don't have your own thoughts. You have their thoughts or the group's thoughts. Speaker 1: I've all my siblings died. They were killed before birth. My twin was died at 5 months into the birth. They tried to kill us all. My mom considered me a miracle. Speaker 0: I'm not asleep. I'm awake, Speaker 1: and that's why they stole our awake and made it woke. Divide and rule. Thank you for the few people that is listening to my voice. The next video will concentrate on the United States and what the heavy spraying they're doing here. Tennessee. Everybody keeps saying, oh, Tennessee. Don't get sprayed anymore. Whatever. That's heavy spraying in Tennessee right there. Stand by. You can't outlaw this. It ain't. That's why I don't fight it through the states as much. They all know about it. Standing by.
Video Not Available youtube.com
STOP Toxic Chemtrail Operations! Save Our Planet! Save Our Planet From Toxic Chemtrail Operations! 3rd Gen Commercial Fisherman, I'm Not Here To Build Any Platform. I'm Only Here To Share Truth & Save The Pl... givesendgo.com

@Real1FisherMan - Real Fishing Life🆘🐟🦐🦈🐳🌊🌎✝️🇺🇸🇳🇴

@Real1FisherMan - Real Fishing Life🆘🐟🦐🦈🐳🌊🌎✝️🇺🇸🇳🇴

One of The Most Heartless Evil Human Beings on The Planet! Professor David Keith, Geoengineer!👿 "The Greatest Trick the Devil ever pulled was Convincing the World He Did NOT Exist," Means that the Devil aims to Hide Himself completely from the Eyes of Mankind, while He continues His Never Ending Work to Turn People Away From God.👍🆘👇🙏 Let Me Introduce You to One of The Most Heartless Evil Human Beings on The Planet! Professor David Keith, Geoengineer!👿 Only a Psychopath would want to Poison & Robbed The Earth of its Life-Giving Nutrients! Like Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide & The Sunlight itself! Carbon Dioxide is a Chemical Compound with the Chemical Formula CO 2. It is Made up of Molecules, that each have One Carbon Atom covalently double bonded to Two Oxygen Atoms! 🌲Plants use Photosynthesis to Capture Carbon Dioxide & then Release half of it into the Atmosphere through Respiration. Plants also Release OXYGEN into the Atmosphere through Photosynthesis! The Benefits of Sunlight!🌞 Better sleep, Improved mood, Stronger, bones, Vitamin D, Lower Blood Pressure, Reduced Depression, Cancer Prevention, Heal Inflammation, Improve Symptoms of Mental Health! ☠️Trees are Dying! No Birds! No Insects! Our lands, Our Waters, and Our People are being Poisoned! 📵We must put down the Hypnosis Devices, Mad Scientist have Created for Us to be Deceived, Divided, and Distracted! ⚔️We have No Choice! We Must Unite and Fight these Lunatics, that are Controlling every Aspect of Our Lives! We have No Choice Here! I wish there were some other way, but this is War! We must shut off all Electricity to these Devices & Stop the Toxic Chemtrail Operations! Stop the Mayhem now!🆘Weather Manipulation Technologies Hid from Public Since 1965!🛰️ We Must Stop These Toxic Weather Control Operations! Nothing Else Matters! Your Fancy Bars, Cars, Houses, Video Games, Ball Games, Television Shows! The List can go on! None of that Matters any Longer! Only the Fight to Save Our Planet🆘Our Freedoms! We must Concentrate every Moment of Our Lives! For the Effort to Save Everything! Commercial Fisherman, Standing By! We Must Realize, We are Under Hypnosis!https://youtu.be/XIAXuxoSjo8 OUR Uniformed Personnel! Must Stand With The People! Not The Corporate Corrupt Government! We Have Today!🆘👇🙏 https://givesendgo.com/GBNU1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Spraying sulfuric acid in the stratosphere to cool the planet is a controversial geoengineering idea. Despite concerns about environmental risks and public opinion, research on solar radiation management continues. The concept involves using aircraft to release reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere to reduce sunlight absorption. While the science behind it shows promise, governance and potential side effects remain major challenges. Funding from private sources like Richard Branson is sought for research, but strict regulations are needed to prevent misuse of these technologies. Efforts to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere are also being explored.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You could actually spray sulfuric acid in the stratosphere 20 kilometers over our head and use that to stop the planet warming up and it Speaker 1: would have Speaker 0: an ugly tech fix. Speaker 1: You could you could spray something into the atmosphere Speaker 0: to Yeah. Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Speaker 0: Pollution into the atmosphere to stop it warming. How do you do this? You start with a fleet of modified business jet and say 20,000 tonnes of sulfuric acid into the stratosphere every year. And each year, you have to put a little more. And this doesn't, in the long run, mean that you can forget about cutting emissions. We will need to rein in No. Speaker 1: We'll get to it eventually. In the meantime, we're shrouding the earth in sulfuric acid. Speaker 0: So people are terrified about talking about this because they're scared that it will prevent us cutting emissions. Speaker 1: Right. And also that it's sulfuric acid. Speaker 0: We put 50,000,000 tons of sulfuric acid in the air now as pollution, and it kills a 1000000 people a year worldwide. Speaker 1: Okay. But it'll be better if we put more in. Speaker 0: We're talking about 1% of that. Speaker 1: 1% more. We're just killing 10,000 more people. Speaker 0: You can Speaker 1: do math. What happens to the sulfuric acid after it's sprayed? Does it just stay up there? Speaker 0: No. It rains down, but it's a tiny addition when we're already doing. Speaker 1: Is there any possible way this could come back to bite us in the air? Speaker 0: That actually turns out to be an old idea. This was known since president Johnson. Speaker 1: You ever look at those planes up there? They have contrails behind them? Maybe all those planes are the contrails. Maybe they're actually spraying chemicals in the atmosphere right now, and uncle Sam isn't telling us. Speaker 0: Seems extremely unlikely. The fact Speaker 1: that the United States is not telling something to its citizens, that seems extremely likely to me. We are the newspaper. I think they might have your idea already. Speaker 0: This geoenician idea in its simplest form is basically the following. You could put, sign particles, say sulfuric acid particles, sulfates, into the upper atmosphere of the stratosphere where they reflect away sunlight and cool the planet. There's lots of mystery in the details and there are some bad side effects like it partially destroys the ozone layer, and I'll get to that in a minute, but it clearly cools down. And one other thing, it's fast. I guess the thing I haven't said about this is it is absurdly cheap. It's amazing how we can affect the planet. The one thing about this is it gives us extraordinary leverage. This improved science and engineering will, whether we like it or not, give us more and more leverage to affect the planet, to control the planet, to give us weather and climate control. Not because we plan it, not because we want it, just because science delivers it to us bit by bit. What Speaker 2: is geoengineering? It's Speaker 0: really 2 very different things. One is ways that we would alter the amount of sunlight the Earth absorbs and so cool the planet, partly offsetting the effects of carbon in the atmosphere, and that's called solar radiation management or, in some technocratic way, SRM. And the other one is to take carbon out of the atmosphere, so called carbon dioxide removal. Speaker 2: Before we get on to solar radiation management, let me ask you about the the carbon dioxide removal. A Royal Society report here in the United Kingdom back in 2009 said that no method of carbon dioxide removal has yet been demonstrated to be effective at an affordable cost with acceptable environmental impacts, and they only work to reduce temperatures over very long timescales. Speaker 0: I think that's exactly right. And I can say that both as an author of that report and as somebody running a startup company trying to capture CO 2 from the air. Speaker 2: Before we get into the pros and cons of it, how solar radiation management might work? Speaker 0: Conceptually, it's simple. The doing it is not the hard part. But you could use aircraft or other methods to deliver, literally tons or millions of tons of very small reflective aerosols, tiny particles, say to the upper atmosphere. Speaker 2: Spraying them out at at a high altitude? Correct. Isn't one of the problems with the climate is and studying the climate is that it's incredibly difficult to know exactly how it works. It is very difficult to model. Speaker 0: Sure. It's it's impossible to know exactly, but you can still learn a lot. So we actually ran a survey of almost a year ago now that took data high quality data from a 1,000 people in the UK, Canada and the US to try and understand public support for research on these technologies and, you know, what kind of political leanings, influence people's decision to be for or against. And in fact, we found pretty broad support for research. Speaker 2: But that particular opinion survey that you're talking about, it also came up with a finding that 64% of subjects agree that humans should not be manipulating nature in the way suggested by solar radiation management. Speaker 0: Exactly. Speaker 2: Well, that would suggest that there isn't particularly broad support at the moment for the theory behind this. Speaker 0: There's not broad support for doing it and I think that's quite a healthy thing. I mean, I'm one of the people who maybe starting 20 years ago most helped to open the door to get public conversation going on this data. Speaker 2: How do you think in that case the public can be convinced, given that there is, as we saw with this project in Britain, tremendous skepticism even about research at what you say is a very, very benign level? Public opinion will evolve over a Speaker 0: long time. And from my point of view, the goal is to try and make that public opinion be able to have be able to be shaped by facts as well as possible and also shaped by people's values. It's not to promote this. So actually Speaker 2: Well, it is in part to promote this. I mean, you're a great enthusiast for this. And as you said, you have your own private company, which is Speaker 0: And my private company works on a very different part of it, which doesn't suffer from these governance challenges. Speaker 2: But it is all to do with the issue of geoengineering. I mean, no, it's an incredibly sensitive topic. Speaker 0: And actually don't think my job is brilliant. My job is to help clear thinking and clear knowledge about the tools we have to regulate climate risk, among them this one. And I'm perfectly prepared to find that results show that we should never do this. So if it works, and again, we don't know it does, it provides some protection in the near term. Speaker 2: Isn't there a problem though that you could end up with different effects in different parts of the world? I mean, you could, for example, find that although you're reducing the amount of, sunlight and the amount, therefore, that the earth is is warming up, rainfall is affected in different ways in different parts of the world. Speaker 0: Absolutely. Essentially, the the scientists and technocrats, including myself, I guess, are helping to invent a thermostat knob. But it's much easier to invent the knob than to figure out who should be in charge of it in a world with many states. Speaker 2: No. Indeed. And I want to come on to the governance, but I'm I want to ask specifically about the science of this, which is how far can you tell whether the effects of cellular radiation management are then going to cause perhaps a catastrophic loss of rainfall in a certain part of the world. At the moment, it seems to be hazy, this. Speaker 0: I think it's not as hazy as that. So using exactly the same climate models as we've used to estimate the problems with CO 2 in the atmosphere, the underlying climate problem, we've applied those same models and safe techniques to look at this. And the results so far, I have to say, look pretty good. That's why we're paying any attention to it. Speaker 2: Richard Branson himself, who owns the Virgin Airline Group, was quoted back in 2009 in The New York Times saying, if we could come up with a geoengineering answer to this problem, we could carry on flying our planes and driving our cars. Speaker 0: It's going to cost a lot of money. Speaker 2: And you're you're I mean, let's be clear here. You and your company are after Branson's money. Speaker 0: The cheapest thing to do is to use the atmosphere as a waste dump. And if we wanna stop doing that, we must have laws that restrict the ability to use the atmosphere as a waste dump. Speaker 2: My question is, are you not concerned that you and your I mean, your company, Carbon Engineering, is looking for money from people like Richard Branson. It's funded, I think, in part by Murray Edwards who is a key figure in tar sands, which is seen as one of the dirtiest fuels on the planet. It is. Are you not slightly concerned about the people who you're getting into bed with? Speaker 0: I'm happy to take money from serious folks who have a broad set of interests. No problem. First of all, I should say, for work on SRM, on these very high leverage technologies that have security concerns, I believe there should be no private action. There should be no for profit action. I believe it would make sense for SRM to actually restrict or eliminate the possibility of patenting Speaker 2: Isn't your company involved in several patents at the moment? Speaker 0: This is the difference. So for capturing CO2 from the air, that's an encapsulated small technology, which can be regulated by the normal laws. It's inherently expensive, so there's no risk of sucking all the CO2 out of the air because it costs so much. Any technology you have that removes CO2 will have local risks, maybe unacceptable risk. But those risks can be managed by the normal local risk management we have. So I think that I'm happy to see private action on cutting emissions by making solar power or electric vehicles or capture from air. I'm not happy to see public action on technologies where there's huge leverage like putting particles in I'll tell you a little bit about some new work we've been doing, thinking about how you actually might put, aerosols in the stratosphere. The novel method we've been thinking about, or it's not novel at all, it's actually exactly what happens from aircraft contrails, is that we put a condensable a few, megatons a year of sulfur would be enough to produce sort of 4 watts per square meter radiating forcing directly out of the back of an aircraft. There's a huge literature in the nanofabrication world about making fine particles from low vapor pressure gas. And there's nothing very hard in terms of aircraft engineering. If you go to aircraft engineers and we've done this, they say, that would be easy. Speaker 1: We could do this if you want us to. Speaker 0: We've mostly thought about sulfur, and there's a lot of good reasons to think about sulfur because sulfur is what nature does, at least in this version of the model. This is if you put sulfur in continuously, you actually get remarkably ineffective result. Nevertheless, there might be some good reasons to think about alumina. The big deal really is that alumina has 4 times the volumetric rate as sulfur, but roughly 16 times less the oxides. So it certainly just by spraying alumina vapor out which oxidizes. So it certainly seems pretty cost effective and easy to do this with aircraft that are not very different from conventional aircraft. High class business jets like the Gulfstream have, wing designs that are very efficient. So with slightly different edging choices, they can easily deliver large, weights up to sort of 20 kilometers or a little higher and you could do that by either building new versions of these aircraft or even reengineering existing aircraft. We have engineering firms that can do it. So you go to an engineering firm and you this done. They don't say this is hard or unusual. They say, okay. Yes. We could do it. Once you realize you can make things by direct condensation from vapor, then all sorts of different compounds are possible. But it's much, much harder to actually figure out the environmental risks and effectiveness.
Video Not Available youtube.com
STOP Toxic Chemtrail Operations! Save Our Planet! Save Our Planet From Toxic Chemtrail Operations! 3rd Gen Commercial Fisherman, I'm Not Here To Build Any Platform. I'm Only Here To Share Truth & Save The Pl... givesendgo.com
Saved - June 24, 2024 at 8:15 AM

@Resist_05 - Pelham

The world has reached a point where governments and media actually make people believe this is normal…🇵🇸💔 https://t.co/TwauELkk1i

Saved - July 23, 2024 at 10:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve noticed that mainstream media like the BBC is finally acknowledging geo-engineering as a massive industry. It’s time for a serious discussion about whether we want to keep blocking out sunlight globally. Personally, I oppose spraying metallic compounds into the atmosphere and I miss sunlight and Vitamin D. What do you think?

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

Dear Normies, Now that Legacy Media BBC amongst others MSM channels have admitted to Geo-Engineering & the fact it’s already a £100Billion Industry….. It’s probably time we all had a grown up conversation about whether we collectively wish to continue blocking out Sunlight daily on a Global Basis. Personally I’m against the idea of spraying thousands tonnes of a metallic compound into the atmosphere with no idea on the impact it will cause. I also miss sunlight & Vitamin D. How about you?

Saved - December 5, 2024 at 10:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just found out that for the next five years, my tax dollars are being used to block out the sun. It's shocking to think I'm funding something that could harm my health and my family's by depriving us of sunlight. They didn't even consult us before making this decision.

@savyrecords - Savy 🇨🇦

NO LONGER A CONSPIRACY 🇨🇦 your tax dollars are being spent blocking out the sun...for the next 5 YEARS!!! 👇 You're paying to poison yourself You're paying to make you and your family sick from lack of sunlight. They didn't even ask they just did it

@savyrecords - Savy 🇨🇦

https://thecountersignal.com/environment-canada-to-invest-in-bill-gates-inspired-sun-blocking-technology/

Environment Canada to invest in Bill Gates-inspired sun blocking technology  Environment Canada released a 5 year plan aiming to curb climate change by investing in technologies that literally block out the sun. thecountersignal.com
Saved - January 17, 2025 at 6:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For the past two weeks, clouds have completely covered the world, and we haven't seen the sun at all. I learned about a plan called Stratospheric Aerosol Injection, which creates artificial clouds to reflect sunlight and combat climate change. Could this be the reason?

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨🌎 “For the past 2 weeks it’s been completely covering the entire World” “Where we live - we haven’t seen the Sun a single day in two weeks” Did you know there is a well documented & experimented plan to create unnatural cloud via Stratospheric Aerosol Injection aka Geo-Engineering - it’s designed to reflect the Suns Rays & reverse the effects of alleged Climate Change….. Couldn’t be that though…..could it?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Check out my weather app. I switched from radar to the clouds filter, and the whole world appears covered in a gray haze. In the U.S., only Miami is clear, but everywhere else, including the oceans and Canada, is shrouded. I've monitored this map daily for two years, and for the past two weeks, it's been consistently overcast. We haven't seen the sun at all during this time. This isn't just a local issue; it's a global phenomenon. What’s happening to our skies?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, guys. You wanna see something really wild? This is my weather app. I'm gonna show you how I put on the clouds filter. It was on radar before, now it's on clouds. I'm gonna show you how the entire world is covered in this gray haze. The entire world. So here's just the United States, and you could tell just in Miami, there's no clouds. But why is every single part of the United States and the oceans and Canada, why is everything covered in this gray? And I have been looking at this map every day for like 2 years to see if it changes. Sometimes it's worse than others, but the past 2 weeks, it has been completely covered all over the whole world. And where we live, we haven't seen the sun even for a single day in 2 weeks. So I wanted to show you guys that this is going on, that the sky is covered, not just where you are. It's also covered everywhere else. And what are they doing to our skies?
Saved - January 18, 2025 at 3:18 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🇬🇧 Day 6 straight - of solid White Sky again. Kids will start growing up thinking the colour of the sky is White & not indeed Blue. You all know why. https://t.co/lxpkCZH1qM

Saved - January 25, 2025 at 3:01 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

It’s hard to understand why the number 1 issue across the World is rarely ever still discussed. The Global Dimming is very real - you can see it. https://t.co/xHTurckRnG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ten years ago, I presented data on undisclosed climate engineering operations, which lacked environmental impact reports. Since then, our organization has invested over $100,000 in testing emissions from aircraft, confirming the presence of aluminum nanoparticles. This issue is now being recognized globally, with discussions among climate scientists about the use of jet aircraft to disperse particles that deflect solar energy. These toxic particles have been detected in rain tests, particularly in Redding, where significant aluminum contamination was noted. Despite ongoing precipitation tests, results have not been disclosed. The environmental impact on soil and ecosystems remains unaddressed, but awareness is growing, with new legislation emerging in states like Tennessee and Florida.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll ask for Dean Wigginton. Okay. And Mr. Wigginton, there you are. Please come forward and welcome. Speaker 1: 10 years ago in these chambers, I presented data, testing data on climate engineering operations that are not publicly disclosed, no environmental impact report, no public disclosures. The board at that time was going to solicit Sacramento for additional testing. I don't think any of that ever was followed through with. Since that time, geoengineeringwatch.org, which is our organization, has spent over $100,000 taking a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration flying lab to altitude, all on film, all on the record, top scientists in that aircraft, tested what heavy aircraft were emitting and found exactly what we knew we'd find, starting with the aluminum nanoparticles. We have the entire global climate science community discussing exactly what we have stated is happening in our skies, putting jet aircraft in the sky to disperse light scattering particles to deflect some of the sun's incoming thermal energy. These particles are toxic. They're showing up in rain tests everywhere. Here in Redding, I was invited to a closed door meeting at Redding Environmental Waste. And I was asked if I knew where the massive amounts of aluminum were coming from that were showing up in rain tests. And after every single precipitation event in Sacramento River and the tributaries, those tests have never been disclosed to date. And now the damage done from this contaminant in our precipitation with soil, soil microbiome, and a host of other issues with precipitation disruption, none of that has been disclosed to date, but this issue is gaining ground. It's gaining traction. We now have legislation passed in Tennessee. Florida's following suit. Other states are following suit.
Saved - February 26, 2025 at 12:01 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

The people must be censored for the genocide to continue … Chemtrails - Chem Trails - Poisons from the GOV... https://t.co/b32OeAd7Ei

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2007, the US government planned to aerial spray toxins over 7 million people in Northern California. Public outcry revealed the dangers and stopped the project. This is just one instance of over 30 times the US government has covertly experimented with toxic chemicals on its own citizens. Mass covert sterilizations, often via vaccines, have occurred in Brazil, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines, under programs linked to organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Health Organization. Furthermore, spermicidal GMO corn was field-tested by Novartis and Syngenta with US government backing, framed as a solution to overpopulation. Given these facts, and the current global fertility decline, I believe we must consider the possibility of a direct depopulation agenda to fully understand and address the challenges we face.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 02/2007, the US Department of Agriculture and Homeland Security funded a proposed project to aerial spray over 7,000,000 people in urban areas of Northern California. After citizens organized against the plan, officials were forced to reveal that the spray included multiple toxins that can cause disease and disrupt the reproductive cycle. Fortunately, civil resistance stopped the project. The US government has been caught over 30 times covertly experimenting with toxic chemicals on its own citizens, from soldiers, prisoners, and Native American reservations to entire towns and counties. Mass covert sterilization of women and girls, usually using secret additives to vaccines, has been exposed in Brazil, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, Mexico, and The Philippines. These have been under the auspices of such programs as John D. Rockefeller's Population Council, the US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, where Nelson Rockefeller was undersecretary, and the Rockefeller founded World Health Organization. Novartis and Syngenta, in cooperation with the US Department of Agriculture and the Department of Defense, had field tested a spermicidal strain of GMO corn that would render male consumers infertile. This was quietly announced as a contribution to the world overpopulation problem. The list goes on and on. Right now, global human fertility is plunging. I'm convinced that this is no accident. For me, being willing to consider and research a direct depopulation agenda was critical to my getting the whole picture and to generating responses that could be sufficient to the task we face. I know this may sound crazy, but imagine that it's 1932 and we're in Germany. If I told you that in the next decade, millions of people would be exterminated.
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 5:31 AM

@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker

Sky Lab confirms the government is spraying us like insects. https://t.co/azhuQQ1Oc5

Video Transcript AI Summary
A video went viral showing a California woman confronting a pilot at the Modesto Jet Center about alleged "heavy metal" dumping. The woman claims to have tracked flights over Tulum County, collected over 20 rainwater samples, and filed public records requests. She alleges these revealed elevated levels of aluminum, barium, strontium, titanium, and magnesium, which she claims are materials used in "chemtrails." She tracked a Beechcraft C-90 King Air conducting repeated seeding flights over Sonora using Flight Radar 24. She confronted the pilot, stating she's tired of the company "dumping heavy metals" and that rain samples show high amounts of the listed elements after flights. She claimed the company isn't returning calls and legal action is planned. She also stated that the soil is contaminated, leading to aluminum-resistant GMO seeds and health issues like early-onset dementia. The pilot responded that it's "not his department" and that she should direct her concerns elsewhere.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Video of a Californian woman confronting a pilot after he landed at 01:30AM has just gone viral. Speaker 1: They're tired of you dumping heavy metals all over our county. Oh, I'm not the Speaker 2: one to talk to about that. No. Speaker 1: But you are, but you're the one that's doing it. So Speaker 0: For the last last several years, she's tracked these flights over Tulum County, collected over 20 rainwater samples, and filed public records requests revealing hazardously elevated levels of aluminum, barium, strontium, titanium, and magnesium, the very materials they use in their trails as confirmed by air sample analysis collected up in the sky within the trails themselves. Speaker 2: At great effort and expense, we acquired a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's line lab with top scientists in it, took samples at altitude behind heavy aircraft. We sample what they were emitting. Sample was processed at one of the top testing institutions in the world. We found exactly what we knew we would find. Speaker 0: Fast forward to this week when she claims to have had enough. Using flight radar 24, she tracked a beach c 90 kink air conducting repeated seating flights over Sonora. She drove to the Modesto Jet Center to confront the pilots directly. Speaker 1: 904DK. That's who that is. He can go himself. At some point, I will get down to the airport. So this is the Modesto Jet Center. K? Oh my god. That's them. Look. I'm in the building. They let me in. You're Tim. Right? Speaker 2: I'm one of the other captains. Speaker 1: Oh, great. We've been trying to reach you for a long time, and we are tired of you dumping heavy metals all over our county. Speaker 2: Well, I'm not the one to talk to about that. No. But you are, but you're the Speaker 1: one that's doing it. So I've been taking RAIN samples. I have over 20 samples. And every time you fly, we get high amounts of aluminum, barium, strontium, titanium, magnesium. Speaker 2: You can talk to them about that. Speaker 1: So called them, and they're not calling me back. So we're now gonna bring something legal against your company. We are real people underneath what you're doing. You spray right over our houses now. You did two flights, two three hour flights. Speaker 2: Public knowledge. It's well, it's Speaker 1: not really, though. That's the problem. So we've been doing this for thirty years. They are now selling aluminum, genetically modified seeds to grow food because our soil is so contaminated. There's an early onset dementia. There's Alzheimer's. Things are starting Speaker 2: to happen to people's health. That's not my department. Speaker 1: I I know the goal Speaker 2: Did you drive here today? Yes. We did. You're contributing to the pollution and the environment as well. What is your name again? It's none of your business. Speaker 1: It is my business because you're over my head dumping over our families and Speaker 2: our houses. Illegal. So It's Speaker 1: not illegal yet. You are contributing to dumping heavy metals on our soils and in our air. We're breathing it. We're drinking it. We're eating it. It matters to me. Speaker 2: I understand that. I'm not saying it doesn't matter. I'm just saying I'm Speaker 1: not It does matter. Speaker 2: But I'm not the one for you to bring these concerns to you. And we do the best we can to bring awareness to it. Yeah. It's just proper awareness, and it's not con serious stuff.
Saved - April 25, 2025 at 3:50 PM

@Artemisfornow - Bernie

NET ZERO - The UK is covering Thousands and thousands of hectares of agricultural land in solar panels, a bit like this! … And then they dimmed the sun 🤡 https://t.co/6blj6Sd7Hv

Saved - May 15, 2025 at 7:49 AM

@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser

"When they first introduced sunglasses, it started triggering a massive increase of cancer." 😳 https://t.co/93iycVYjIT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sunglasses may trigger a massive increase in cancer because they filter out rays of the sun that are supposed to enter the body. The pineal gland needs the entire spectrum of light for basic metabolic processes. UV light is needed to produce a hormone in the brain responsible for melanin production, which protects the skin. Without this hormone, skin becomes susceptible to sunlight. When wearing sunglasses, the body may think it's dark and not produce the melanin needed for skin protection. Light is needed for cell communication, and sunlight is required for cells to grow and reproduce, allowing the body to constantly renew itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When they first introduced sunglasses, it started triggering a massive increase of cancer. So it has everything to do with cancer. You are filtering out certain rays of the sun which are supposed to enter. You're blocking them out. And the pineal gland, which receives the light in a different color formation, that means the entire spectrum of light, it is necessary for the body to have that light, the basic metabolic processes. Also, you have to allow UV light to come in. When you do that, you are producing a hormone in the brain that is responsible for the melanin production in your skin. So that's where your skin protection occurs. If you are not producing that, your skin becomes susceptible to even sunlight. Let's say you wear sun shades, your body thinks it's dark outside, but it doesn't make that hormone responsible for producing the melanin to protect your skin. The light is needed. Every cell communicates with every other cell through light. Our cells require sunlight to grow and reproduce themselves so that you have a new, you know, body constantly, you know, created over and over and over again.
Saved - May 19, 2025 at 5:19 AM

@vegastarr - vegastar

Something just isn’t right with the Sun anymore… It feels different. Looks different. Too white. Too harsh. Too artificial. 🌞 Even sunflowers have stopped turning to face it.🌻 Let that sink in. Is it still the same Sun? Or is something being hidden? Question everything! https://t.co/4M3JiN7eRz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker observes that sunflowers on their property are not exhibiting heliotropism, the characteristic behavior of facing the sun. The sunflowers are turned away from the sun, which the speaker finds unusual, as other plants like beans and corn are growing normally. The speaker speculates about the cause of this phenomenon, suggesting a possible connection to those who took down their videos, while acknowledging they cannot prove this or point fingers. The speaker, identifying as a farm boy, asks for others' opinions on the matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Something just isn't right about the sun anymore. Well, let me show you something here about authenticity. And you guys tell me what you think about this. Can you see those sunflowers? Sunflowers have a thing called heliotropism. They face the sun and curve their face towards the sun every day, all day, every hour to absorb the sun. Can you see there? Yeah. Yeah. They got their face turned away from the sun here. Now if you look up over through there, can see the beans and the corn and all that kind of stuff. And they don't have much choice. It's either grow straight up or fall down. But these sunflowers have a completely different mechanism. And for some reason, they don't like the sun. I don't know what's causing that, but I'm inclined to say that the very people that took down my videos also might be responsible for this. I don't know that to be the truth, and I have no one to point a finger at. But I do know that these sunflowers are not facing the right direction. This is a farm boy. Let me know what you think about that.
Saved - July 6, 2025 at 7:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've come across some eye-opening insights about sunlight and skin cancer. Contrary to popular belief, outdoor workers have lower melanoma rates despite more sun exposure. A Swedish study revealed that avoiding sunlight increases the risk of premature death. Sunlight is essential for mood regulation and overall health, yet dermatology has propagated fear around it, leading to unnecessary treatments and surgeries. It's crucial to differentiate between harmless and deadly skin cancers and to question the motives behind the fear-driven narrative. We need to reclaim our relationship with the sun.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Everything you’ve been told about skin cancer and the sun is a lie. Outdoor workers get 3–10 times MORE sun exposure yet have LOWER melanoma rates than those stuck inside. It gets worse. A 20-year Swedish study found that avoiding sunlight raised the risk of premature death by 60%, especially from heart disease and cancer. They pushed sunscreen and fear while ignoring the simple truth that sun exposure mostly causes HARMLESS cancers, while sun avoidance is linked to the DEADLIEST ones. Get ready to be re-educated about the sun. It’s time to unlearn the lies you’ve been sold. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Ever wonder why you were told to hide from the sun? It was never about your health. Sunlight regulates circadian rhythms, lifts your mood, drives blood flow, and lowers your risk of dying. And yet dermatology declared war on it—turning life-giving light into a deadly threat while skin cancer diagnoses soared.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against-f81

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Sunlight is medicine. It sets your body clock. It fights depression. It structures water in your tissues, powering microcirculation beyond what your heart alone can do. Infrared light literally helps blood flow. But they never told you. They hid the truth—and we’re now suffering the consequences.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Decades ago, hospitals actually used ultraviolet blood irradiation (UVBI) to cure deadly infections, autoimmune diseases, and even sepsis. Because it worked. But the American Medical Association killed it. Why? The inventor of UVBI refused to sell them the rights. If they can’t have it, no one can.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So they ran a fake “study” designed to fail, smeared UVBI therapy as quackery, and banished it from American hospitals. All to protect profits. Meanwhile, other countries kept using it—because it saved lives. Sounds familiar.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc In fact, it’s the same playbook they’ve used to kill countless other treatments and medicines. ✔️ Label rivals as quacks. ✔️ Buy off pharma. ✔️ Control medical schools. ✔️ Monopolize treatment.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Dermatology used to be the least glamorous gig—just acne and rashes. But in the 1980s, they paid millions to a New York ad agency to rebrand themselves as “cancer warriors.” They didn’t just warn about cancer. They sold fear and transformed dermatology into a gold mine.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Dermatologists rebranded as “skin cancer experts,” invented mass screening events, and pumped the public full of sun fear. Waiting rooms were suddenly filled with healthy people who were terrified of the sun. A billion-dollar sales funnel was born.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want to learn how to avoid that sales funnel and treat skin cancer effectively? Empower yourself with knowledge and don’t be pushed around. @MidwesternDoc shares all the details. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against-f81

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Mohs surgery is dermatology’s ultimate cash cow. What was meant to spare tissue on the face became routine for even minor skin cancers. Medicare use exploded a shocking 700% between 1992 and 2009.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The article "Dermatology's Disastrous War Against the Sun" claims that while relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, the deadliest skin cancers are linked to lack of sunlight. Avoiding the sun doubles one's rate of dying and significantly increases the risk of cancer. The dermatology profession rebranded itself as skin cancer fighters in the eighties, but despite billions spent, there's been no substantial change in skin cancer deaths. Sunlight is critical for mental health; Chinese operating room nurses' mental health declined due to lack of sun exposure. A study found women with higher solar UVB exposure had half the incidence of breast cancer, and men had half the incidence of fatal prostate cancer. A study of Swedish women found sun avoidant women were 60% more likely to die. The largest gain was seen in reduced risk of heart disease, then all-cause mortality, then cancer deaths. Non-smokers who avoided the sun had the same mortality risk as smokers who got sunlight. The American Academy of Dermatology says one in five Americans will develop skin cancer and 9,500 are diagnosed daily, but most are benign. The Academy encourages staying out of tanning beds and using sunscreen, but the article claims the kind of skin cancer caused by the sun is not as scary as the kind caused by not enough sun. Basal cell carcinoma almost never metastasizes and has a near-zero fatality rate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I found this article by Midwestern Doctor. If you haven't followed Midwestern Doctor, you should on Substack. Unbelievable, all this stuff. This person, I don't know if it's a guy or a girl, says Dermatology's Disastrous War Against the Sun, The Forgotten Side of Skin Health and the Necessity of Sunlight by the Midwestern Doctor. Okay, you ready? Get get hold on to your because here it comes. There's gonna be several I'm gonna actually, I'm gonna have to break this up into three different segments, which I will do on Monday. So, I'm just gonna do one segment today. Skin cancers are by far the most commonly diagnosed cancer in The United States. So, to prevent them, the public is constantly told, avoid the sun. You've heard that, avoid the sun, right? Yeah. However, while the relatively benign skin cancers are caused by sun exposure, benign skin cancers, which is what this is, is caused by sun exposure, the ones responsible for most skin cancer deaths are due to the lack of sunlight. Speaker 1: Why, lack of vitamin d or something? Speaker 0: This is unfortunate because sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body as avoiding it doubles one's rate of dying and significantly increases their risk of cancer. The exact opposite, Misha, is this not blowing your mind? Speaker 1: I always thought it was like how Caucasian you are versus how, you know, I thought it like a sliding scale. Speaker 0: Well, I'm telling you right here, Kurt, the important thing we need to focus on here is that take Curt away. Is that avoiding it doubles one's rate of dying. Avoiding the sun doubles your rate of dying Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And significantly increases your risk of cancer. Speaker 1: Yeah. I believe it because when I live in New York, you know, you live like a vampire. Yeah. And everybody has a deficiency. Speaker 0: And now everybody's and There's a common urban problem That's right. Speaker 1: Of severe vitamin d deficiency. Speaker 0: Well, like, in the eighteen hundreds, it was rickets. Speaker 1: Yeah. Right. Speaker 0: And Right. Speaker 1: Boat diseases and shit. Speaker 0: So a strong case can be made that this dynamic was a result of the dermatology profession with the help of a top PR firm rebranding themselves to skin cancer fighters, something which allowed them to become one of the highest paying medical specialty in existence. This happened in the eighties. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: They hired a Wall Street advertising firm. Unfortunately, despite the billions that is put into fighting each year of skin cancer, there has been no substantial change in the number of skin cancer deaths. None. No substantial change. So all this skin cancer awareness and all this and where you're of sunblock by the way, sunblock, a lot of sunblock, toxic. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's what I Speaker 0: They don't tell you that either. Not good. There's two different kinds of sunblock. There's the toxic bad kind. So I'm gonna try to go through this as fast as I can because there's a lot to cover. So because of how successful the war against sunlight has been, many people are unaware of its benefits. For example, sunlight is critical for mental health. This is the most well appreciated this is most well appreciated with depression. For example, consider this study of Chinese operating room nurses, which found their mental health was significantly worse than the general population, and that this decline was correlated to their lack of sunlight exposure. Okay. So that's one. Number two, a large epidemiological study found women with higher solar UVB exposure had only half the incidence of breast cancer. As those with lower solar exposure and that men with higher residential solar exposure had only half the incidence of fatal prostate cancer. A fifty percent reduction in either of these cancers greatly exceeds what any of the approaches we use to treat or prevent them have accomplished. Sun, the sun for fighting cancer. Three, a twenty year prospective study evaluated 29,518 women in Southern Sweden. I was just there. Oh, they're meatballs. Where not kidding. Where women from each age bracket with no significant health issues were randomly selected, essentially making it one of the best possible epidemiologic studies that could be done. It found that women who were sun avoidant compared to those who had regular exposure to sunlight were sixty percent more likely to die. So if you avoid the sun, sixty percent more likely to die, being roughly fifty percent more likely to die than the moderate exposure group, and a hundred and thirty percent more likely to die than the group with high sun exposure. You've been avoiding the sun, haven't you, Misha? Oh, okay. I'll just call her just call her Meester. Speaker 1: Rick Overton said machete. Speaker 0: Okay. No, to be clear, there are very few interventions in medicine that do anything close to this, meaning the sun. The largest gain was seen in the risk of dying from heart disease, while the second gain was seen in the risk of all causes of death besides heart disease and cancer. And the third largest gain was seen in deaths from cancer. So it lowered your risk of death from all those things, including cancer. The investigators concluded that the smaller benefit in reduced cancer death was in part an artifact of the subjects actually living longer and hence succumbing to a type of cancer that would have only affected them later in life. So even though they so what they're saying is that because they got sun, they lived so much longer that a lot of them got cancer at the end, but they would have died much earlier had they not gotten sun exposure. Do you follow that? I hope so. The largest benefit get this, Kurt. The largest benefit was seen in smokers. Yeah. To the point nonsmokers who avoided the sun, nonsmokers who didn't get sun had the same risk of dying as smokers who got sunlight. Speaker 1: Yeah. It makes sense. Because you gotta figure out just your mental state. A 100% getting sun, it change your mental state. Speaker 0: Change your mental state. Speaker 1: And then then it's easier to exercise, especially exercise out in the sun. And it's it it's a radically different feeling than and I've done both things, and the vampire lifestyle Not the brain bad. It's bad. Yeah. So Speaker 0: according to the American Academy of Dermatology, this is what the official dermatology academy says about skin cancer. You ready? Says, skin cancer is the most common cancer in The United States. Current estimates are that one in five Americans will develop skin cancer. They just call it all skin cancer. So there's the kind of skin cancer that most people get, not scary at all. And then there's one percent of people die from skin cancer, that's the scary part. They don't they but they lump them together, so they're doing it here. One in five Americans will develop skin cancer, which makes you shit your pants I thought. And afraid of the sun. Yeah. It is estimated that approximately nine thousand five hundred people in The US are diagnosed with skin cancer every day. But did you know that most of those skin cancers diagnosed are benign? Speaker 1: That's what I I did think that. Speaker 0: Basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, the two most common forms of skin cancer, are highly treatable if detected early and treated properly. They even put these two together, which is incorrect for them to do. Because exposure to UV light is the most preventable risk factor for all skin cancers, so they're lumping all skin cancers together. The kind of skin cancer that's caused by the sun, which is not as scary as the kind of skin cancer that is caused by not enough sun. Speaker 1: Yeah. I didn't know Speaker 0: there actually very scary. Speaker 1: I didn't know there was one caused by not enough sun. Speaker 0: So they're doing that. Speaker 1: The thing I didn't realize. Speaker 0: The Academy of Dermatology encourages everyone to stay out of indoor tanning beds and protect their skin outdoors by seeking shade, wearing protective clothing, including a long sleeve shirt, pants, a wide brimmed hem like machete, and sunglasses with UV protection, and applying a broad spectrum water resistant sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or higher to kill off skin not covered by clothing. Likewise, according to the Skin Cancer Foundation, more than two people die of skin cancer in The US every hour. That sounds pretty scary, right? Well, let's break that down to exactly what that means. It is generally believed that around two point six four million people get one cancer a year, Skin cancer. The three primary risk factors for basal cell carcinoma cancer are excessive sun exposure, fair skin, which makes you more susceptible to excessive sunlight penetrating your skin, and family history of skin cancer. So that's the kind of cancer I got. I have light skin, blue eyes, and I get a lot of sun on my face. Because of this, the widely varying incidence of basal cell carcinoma is largely due to how much sunlight exposure people have, and typically you find it in areas with frequent sunlight exposure, like on the face. Okay? The important thing to understand about basal cell carcinoma is that because it almost never, it almost never metastasizes, it's not very dangerous. And most sources say that it has a zero percent fatality rate.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mohs can cost $10,000–$20,000 while simpler treatments run only hundreds. Dermatologists get paid more for every tiny slice they examine. So they’ll gladly keep slicing. No wonder usage skyrocketed, even when studies show it often offers no added benefit. It was always about the money.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Private equity eventually smelled the money. They snapped up clinics, replaced doctors with cheaper nurses and PAs, and churned out endless biopsies and surgeries. They even targeted nursing homes—exploiting dementia patients. It’s downright disgraceful.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For more details about Mohs, check out @MidwesternDoc’s full report. It will blow your mind. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against-f81

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Let’s talk skin cancer. Here’s the trick: They lump harmless and deadly cancers under one terrifying label. So people think all skin cancer is fatal and that the smallest possibility of it will spread cancer like wildfire throughout your body.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Reality check: Basal Cell Carcinoma (80% of cases) almost never kills. Squamous Cell Carcinoma is treatable and has a 95% survival rate. Only Melanoma is truly deadly. And even melanoma isn’t caused by the sun the way they claim.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc With all the money that's being spent on skin cancer prevention and all the fearmongering making people stay out of the sun, we should see less cancer, right? Doesn’t look like it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here’s a shocker: Outdoor workers get 3–10 times the UV exposure of indoor workers. Yet they have lower melanoma rates. Melanomas often appear on sun-protected body parts. Studies even show sunscreen doesn’t reduce melanoma risk. It may increase it! The truth is that sun exposure mostly causes HARMLESS cancers, while sun avoidance is linked to the DEADLIEST ones.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc One study found fluorescent office lights doubled melanoma risk in women. But you never heard a PSA telling you to cover up at work or quit your job. Just endless scolding to wear sunscreen and stay out of the sun. But we need the sun.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc There is a very real risk in avoiding the sun. A 20-year Swedish study found sun avoiders were 60% more likely to die. Sunlight slashed deaths from heart disease and even cancer. The biggest benefit of sun exposure was seen in smokers.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc But there’s more. Sunlight exposure cut breast cancer rates in half. And it halved fatal prostate cancer in men. Dermatology pretends vitamin D pills can replace the sun. They can’t.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you want to learn more about the positive effects of the sun and how to stay safe while sunbathing and absorbing rays, subscribe to @MidwesternDoc and check out the full report all about the war on sunlight. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against-f81

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The entire “war on the sun” was built on fear. Fear sells screenings. Fear sells biopsies. Fear sells surgeries. It also sells sunscreen, face creams, special clothing, pricey sunglasses, and more. All while costing us our health.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Here’s the truth: Much of dermatology is a sales operation disguised as medicine. Endless screenings. Overdiagnosis. Unnecessary surgeries. Astronomical bills. All built on scaring you away from the sun—and into hiding.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Sunlight is not your enemy. It’s vital to life itself. Yes, real skin cancers need treatment. Of course. But this blanket fear of the sun has harmed far more people than it has helped. It’s time to break free from the fear and reclaim what keeps us healthy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you see a dermatologist, ask questions. Always get a second opinion before any procedure. Educate yourself. Know the difference between deadly melanomas and harmless basal cells. And stop letting a corrupt industry turn your fear into their fortune. It’s time to take back the sun.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against-f81

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: Statins Exposed: The Truth Behind America’s Most Prescribed Drug https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkable-history-and-safety

The Remarkable History and Safety of DMSO Please share your experiences with DMSO with the readers here! midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/t959FpPPFX

Saved - November 18, 2025 at 6:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace how UV blood irradiation cured sepsis and other infections in the 1940s, how the AMA allegedly rigged a study to bury it, and how sunlight is portrayed as dangerous despite evidence of its healing power. I note Sweden’s finding that avoiding sun increases mortality, the rise of UVBI/LBI abroad, and ongoing calls to reconsider light-based therapies the medical establishment has sidelined.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

They buried a cure for deadly infections. In the 1940s, UV blood irradiation was curing sepsis, pneumonia, and even polio. But the American Medical Association rigged a study to kill it, ensuring this life-saving therapy vanished. Decades later, Trump curiously suggested putting light inside the body to treat COVID. The media mocked him with bleach jokes. But he may have unknowingly referenced a powerful light-based therapy with proven results. 🧵

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Sunlight isn't the enemy. And the campaign against it is a lie. @MidwesternDoc's report uncovers the shocking truth: almost everything you’ve been told about sunlight is wrong—and it’s costing us our health. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-putting-light

The Century of Evidence Putting Light Inside the Body Is A Miraculous Therapy How Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation treats severe many severe Cardiovascular, Infectious, Obstetric, Autoimmune and Neurological Diseases midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc In the 1980s, dermatologists launched a PR blitz blaming sunlight for cancer. Why? To push expensive skin cancer treatments. And I’m sure the skincare industry has enjoyed the fruits of the sunlight scare as well.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc A massive 20-year study in Sweden revealed that women who avoided sunlight were 130% more likely to die. Those same women were also more likely to develop things like cancer. Read that part again. The women who avoided sunlight were more likely to develop cancer.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc It’s true. Most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight. Check out this deep dive from @MidwesternDoc. It will make you rethink everything you’ve been told about sunlight. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It turns out, natural light heals us. And a lack of it destroys more than you might think. Sunlight regulates everything—from immune function to mental health. It plays a pivotal role in: • Cancer and Infections • Circulation • Behavioral disorders • Animal health, fertility, and agricultural productivity • Regulating growth cycles and the circadian rhythm

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc You’ve been lied to about the sun. @MidwesternDoc's report exposes how modern medicine turned sunlight into a scapegoat — and why avoiding it may be making us sicker, not safer. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did you know your eyes are your main light receptors? If you regularly wear glasses or contacts, you might be unknowingly starving your body of light. And that’s on top of the fact that most people spend their days indoors, away from light. Standard glass—from windows to glasses—blocks healing UV from reaching us.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Knowledge of the healing power of light isn’t new. One of the oldest proven therapies in medicine is… sunlight! https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-putting-light

The Century of Evidence Putting Light Inside the Body Is A Miraculous Therapy How Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation treats severe many severe Cardiovascular, Infectious, Obstetric, Autoimmune and Neurological Diseases midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Following the development of various sanitizing UV devices, something incredible happened. In 1928, Emmett Knott accidentally discovered that irradiating a small amount of blood with UV light could save dying animals. By 1933, his method saved a human who was dying from septicemia. It went on to treat thousands with nearly miraculous results.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By the 1940s, ultraviolet blood irradiation—or UVBI—was curing sepsis, pneumonia, polio, hepatitis, and more—even when antibiotics failed. And by the early 1950s, it was being used in around 50 hospitals in the U.S. and doctors published 50 papers involving 3,000+ patients with unbelievable success stories. Even The New York Times and Time Magazine covered it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And then came the American Medical Association. They offered to validate the therapy if Knott handed over the rights. He refused. So they rigged a study to fail and declared UVBI useless, despite their own data showing it worked. Despite having seen the success of UVBI firsthand, hospitals dropped it overnight.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And yet, the results couldn’t be denied. • Patients on the verge of death recovered. • Severe pain vanished. • Vital signs normalized. • Autoimmune flare-ups disappeared. • Sepsis reversed in hours. Sepsis! And all of this happens rapidly, something hardly ever seen in today’s critical care medicine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Because the evidence is overwhelming, Germany, Russia, and others adopted it—and never looked back. UVBI was also modified into Laser Blood Irradiation (LBI), which puts light directly into the bloodstream via catheter or laser patch. Both showed similar benefits.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The data is staggering. • 103 acute infections: 92% success rate • Tuberculosis: 100% cured in 3 months (vs. 59% with antibiotics alone) • Severe pneumonia in infants: Recovery 1.7 times faster • Hepatitis: Viral load dropped up to 45% with 3 UVBI sessions • COVID-19: UVBI reduced hospital stays, prevented death, and healed lungs And there were zero serious side effects. Why isn’t UVBI routinely administered?!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And UVBI doesn’t just fight infections. It transforms chronic disease. It has been shown to improve: • Autoimmune diseases • Circulatory issues • Chronic pain • Depression, migraines, insomnia • Fertility and pregnancy outcomes • Post-surgical recovery It even helped MS patients when cerebrospinal fluid was irradiated. Wow!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Here are some real stories: One man could barely walk around a mall. After 2 UVBI sessions, he walked 2+ miles in the cold with zero pain. Another trial cured 79% of severe pelvic infections. 17 women who had been infertile all became pregnant post-treatment! Sign me up!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, how does it work? UVBI irradiates a small amount of blood—just 40–60ml. That blood then reenters your body and triggers full-body healing. Scientists believe blood conducts light via hemoglobin. Within minutes, oxygenation improves, pain fades, and the immune system reboots. Incredible.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So… Why don’t we have easy access to this today? Take a wild guess. It’s cheap. It’s effective. And it doesn’t make Big Pharma billions. Just like ivermectin, vitamin C, DMSO, and other suppressed treatments—UVBI was blacklisted because it threatened the status quo.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Remember when Trump mentioned putting light “inside the body” to fight COVID? The media twisted it into a bleach joke—but he was unknowingly referring to something very real. UVBI had already been used successfully to treat COVID abroad. And again, the idea isn’t new.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Public awareness is now rising. Joe Rogan and Jimmy Dore both talked about UVBI. Alternative clinics quietly use it. And researchers have compiled over 200 published studies on UVBI and LBI—with consistent, shocking success. The truth is coming out. And we’re here for it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Sunlight is medicine. UVBI could have saved millions—if it weren’t buried by greed. But that’s changing. More people are waking up and realizing the tools to heal have been hidden in plain sight.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-putting-light

The Century of Evidence Putting Light Inside the Body Is A Miraculous Therapy How Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation treats severe many severe Cardiovascular, Infectious, Obstetric, Autoimmune and Neurological Diseases midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for

DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/Tp68K4IVaj

Saved - January 10, 2026 at 11:25 PM

@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate

Fake winters: Clear chemtrailing to block the UV otherwise people would ask questions. https://t.co/jRLW83fStq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that people often ask about a “fake winter.” According to the speaker, there is a clear substance that is sprayed when the skies are completely blue. This substance is described as a clear material that resembles lacquer. The speaker claims that the purpose of this spray is to block out the UV radiation. After the spraying, the speaker states that there is a “winter freeze” coming. They emphasize that the skies are completely blue, yet this clear material is present, blocking the UV entirely. The speaker concludes that, as a result, there is “fake winter” and this is done so that people do not ask questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So people always ask, what do mean they make a fake winter? Well, this is the clear stuff that they spray when the skies are completely blue. And what it does is it blocks out the UV, and then they say there's a winter freeze coming. And as you could see, the skies are completely blue, but this clear stuff that they use, it's almost like a lacquer, and then it blocks the UV completely. And then you got fake winter so people don't ask questions.
Saved - January 13, 2026 at 11:19 PM

@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate

Tanning beds? Taxed and banned by the govt due to reducing big harma profits. While the same govt blocks out the UV with chemtrailing. ☀️☀️If you go tanning try some organic mango butter or tallow when you tan. Happy UVs. https://t.co/vG96AgZWw8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rodney discusses tanning, sharing his personal experience: he used to tan a lot and worked at Palm Beach Tan, tanning all the time. He notes that tanning “went away” after a tanning tax was introduced to pay for the Affordable Care Act. He says the tax meant “instead of incentivizing people to be healthy, they decided to tax the people who wanted to get some vitamin D into their body.” As a result, tanning beds began to fade. He adds that then tanning was said to be dangerous and toxic and people should avoid it, similar to messages about the sun. Consequently, the tanning industry was destroyed. He attributes the decline to both the tanning tax and “tanning fear” that was instilled in the public. Rodney mentions that tanning beds have existed since 1901, with various bulb types such as tanning bulbs, UV bulbs, quartz bulbs, and mercury arc bulbs. He claims that it all makes sense: if you have healthy people, they are a threat to a system that is “just trying to make money off of you the entire time.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rodney says, tell them about tanning. Oh, tanning is an interesting one. Now, most people when you think about tanning, you think about how tanning went away. But I used to do a lot of tanning. I actually worked at Palm Beach Tan, and I used to tan all the time. And then all of a sudden, one day it went away and I wondered why did it go away. And then I found out it was because there became a tanning tax and that tanning tax was put on to pay for the affordable health care act. So instead of instead of incentivizing people to be healthy, they decided to tax the people who wanted to get some vitamin d into their body. Think about that. And so what happened was was all the tanning beds started to fade. Then they came out and said that the tanning was dangerous and toxic and people should avoid it. Just like they tell people about the sun all the time. So guess what it did? It destroyed the tanning industry. So you had a tanning tax and you had tanning fear that was put into the people, and then all of a sudden, all the tanning beds began to go away. It is totally mind blowing when you start to think about how these industries, which have been around since like nineteen o one, like tanning bulbs and UV bulbs and quartz bulbs and mercury arc bulbs and all of those things have been around since nineteen o one. It's all it all makes sense. If you have healthy people, they are a threat to your system that is just trying to make money off of you the entire time.
Saved - May 9, 2026 at 10:48 PM

@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate

Sunscreen invented by a harmacist. The sun heals over 200+ illnesses, but that ain't good for big harma. Book: Light as medicine.📕📕 https://t.co/FxA0LVJWvZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that sunscreen is a product pushed by Big Pharma, which sells sunscreen while not promoting healthy choices like eating well or building a base tan. The speaker claims that pharmaceutical companies “took those chemicals and bake[d] it into their skin” and use fear of the sun to create a recurring customer base, including selling products for children and eventually pills later in life. The transcript contends that the real issue is diet and toxins: “What you're what you're eating,” and that consuming toxins leads to more burning, as the skin tries to expel these toxins with the sun. This creates a recurring cycle of exposure and illness driven by the supposed toxins in food and products. The speaker questions the ubiquity of sunscreen by contrasting humans with animals, noting that birds and other animals don’t wear sunscreen, even though humans are told to use it and follow doctor recommendations allegedly paid by Big Pharma. The implication is that consumer fear is manipulated and that medical professionals may be influenced by industry interests. The overall claim is that the sunscreen narrative is fear-based, designed to keep people buying sunscreen annually and to push products onto children, with a broader scheme to keep people sick and generate ongoing pharmaceutical sales. The speaker frames the sunscreen recommendation as a contrived protection tactic that benefits industry rather than solely protecting health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Into who sells sunscreen and who made sunscreen? Big Pharma. So when people are like, I gotta wear sunscreen because they told me to wear sunscreen. Pharmaceutical companies told you to wear sunscreen. They didn't tell you to eat healthy. They didn't tell you to build up a base tan. They didn't tell you to clean up your diet so that you don't burn because you're gonna burn because of the toxins. Instead, Big Pharma was like, I can sell them sunscreen. And then what they can do is they can take those chemicals and bake it into their skin, and then we can make them afraid of the sun so much that they'll be a reoccurring customer every year. And then they'll take their kids and spray them with chemicals all over the place too on top of that, and then we'll get them sick real early on so we can sell them pills later on in life. What a business model, For telling people to stay out of the sun? But when it gets down to it, it's what you're what you're eating. If you're eating a whole bunch of toxins and poisons, guess what? You're gonna burn. And you're gonna burn because your skin is trying to tell you that you keep poisoning me with this garbage and I'm trying to get it out with the sun, but you keep eating it and you keep bringing those toxins into your body and then so it's a it's a reoccurring cycle. And that's what the whole sunscreen, you know, wear your sunscreen. SPF can't be can't be too safe of that big ball of life. You know, how about how about this? If you wanna think about it, why aren't birds wearing sunscreen? Why aren't any other animals wearing sunscreen? Okay? They're all out there all the time twenty four seven, three sixty five. Yes. You can say they have hair or fur, but they're out there all day. It's only somehow the human who's like, oh, you know what? That infomercial on television told me to wear sunscreen and eat a TV dinner. So, you know, I'm gonna have to do what they told me to do. And my doctor who's paid by big pharma is gonna tell me the same thing. Like, it's just it's crazy when it comes down to it. It's such it's such fear. Right? And that's what it comes down to because
View Full Interactive Feed