reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Travis_in_Flint
Posted - June 7, 2023 at 7:09 PM
Saved - June 8, 2023 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump faces indictment by special counsel Jack Smith for gathering, transmitting, or losing national defense documents. DOJ's refusal to grant a delay due to a prosecutor's promise of a judgeship to a witness's lawyer led to the decision. Trump declassified multiple documents before leaving office, but precedent suggests the President has the authority to decide what is personal. Biden's DOJ has a weak case. The witch hunt continues.

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

Breaking News: President Trump will be indicted as early as next week by special counsel Jack Smith as Garlands DOJ refused to give Trump a delay due to one prosecutor promising a judgeship to the lawyer of one witness. The main charge he faces is gathering, transmitting, or losing national defense documents. Earlier today a document was released that showed Trump declassified multiple documents before leaving office. Bidens DOJ has a very weak case as precedence in previous cases including one with Bill Clinton stated that the President has authority to decide what is personal. The witch hunt continues!

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

More here 👇

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

BREAKING: Biden's DOJ tells Trump he will be indicted next week on charges of 'gathering, transmitting or losing' national defense docs https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-bidens-doj-tells-trump-he-will-be-indicted-next-week-on-charges-of-gathering-transmitting-or-losing-national-defense-docs

BREAKING: Biden’s DOJ tells Trump he will be indicted next week on charges of ‘gathering, transmitting or losing’ national defense docs A federal indictment against Trump could be handed down by a federal grand jury next week. thepostmillennial.com
JackPosobiec
Posted - June 13, 2023 at 5:11 PM
Saved - June 13, 2023 at 6:31 PM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

When he tweeted this, the FBI had a file on the Bidens being investigated for bribery by Ukraine They hid it and let Trump get impeached He was 100% right https://t.co/G3q7uc6zXS

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

As President I have an obligation to end CORRUPTION, even if that means requesting the help of a foreign country or countries. It is done all the time. This has NOTHING to do with politics or a political campaign against the Bidens. This does have to do with their corruption!

realLizUSA
Posted - August 3, 2023 at 5:20 PM
Saved - August 3, 2023 at 10:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Experience the comfort and pleasure of shoes. Biden henchman Jack Smith, an Obama loyalist, targeted VA Gov Bob McDonnell and was involved in the IRS scandal. Smith's wife is a Biden donor and produced a Michelle Obama documentary. Deputy AG Lisa Monaco is a Russiagate architect. Smith worked at the corrupt International Criminal Court. Liz propagates lies. Smith's legal counsel told him he lost, yet he continued with the big lie. Desperate on arraignment day. Smith is like Blasey Ford of special counsels.

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

The Truth About Biden Henchman Jack Smith and the Democrats’ Witch-Hunt

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Smith served under Obama’s “wingman” Eric Holder Overturned unanimously by the Supreme Court in his political targeting of VA Gov Bob McDonnell Instrumental in IRS targeting conservatives scandal

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Jack Smith’s wife is a Biden donor and produced fawning Michelle Obama documentary Deputy AG Lisa Monaco is also Obama loyalist and Russiagate Architect which tried to frame President Trump for Russia “collusion” Smith worked at the corrupt International Criminal Court

@Free_Speech_1A - Free Speech USA

@realLizUSA @mrddmia Smith👉🏼 Blasey Ford of special counsels

@spacespeaker_co - Space Speaker

😎Experience the comfort and pleasure that a pair of shoes can bring to you. 🛒Buy Now 👉https://space-speaker.co/E77861

👟Men's Suede Velcro High Boots - Spacespeaker Note: These shoes have a wider fit than the standard sizing, so it is advised to check the foot and shoe length beforehand to choose the correct size. Simple And Tough Design Helps You Get More Attention In The Crowd!!! FEATURE High-end Fabric The inside is breathable and not stuffy, and the feet are still dry and space-speaker.co

@Drfunkygibbon - GiantFunkyMonkey PhD

@realLizUSA I love the smell of desperacy on arraignment day....

@Gracesodapop - Sodapop

@realLizUSA https://t.co/uhNgKgJc9R

@olhowling_husky - CANIS MAJOR ☆🥑

@realLizUSA When Liz says Truth, she means 'her angle'

@Haulingtmber - Tim Sutton

@realLizUSA @realLizUSA i9s a propagandist for a Traitor to our Republic, that makes her a Traitor. Just move on people and enjoy your day.

@DDSeedling - DDSeedling

@realLizUSA 🤡

@physics_up - Wanderingmind

@realLizUSA His legal counsel told him he lost, yet he continued with big lie. That's fraud.

@FulginitiGreg - Greg F. 🇺🇸

@realLizUSA BS

charliekirk11
Posted - August 25, 2023 at 12:24 AM
Saved - August 25, 2023 at 12:47 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: Trump addresses reporters after his arrest in Fulton County, GA: "We did nothing wrong at all. We should have every single right to challenge an election that we think is dishonest. And we think it's very dishonest."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for the audience's presence and states that they believe it is a sad day for America. Speaker 1 asserts that challenging an election should be allowed, as they believed the election was rigged and stolen. They mention other individuals who have also challenged elections in the past. Speaker 1 claims they did nothing wrong and accuses others of election interference. They thank the audience and reiterate their right to challenge what they perceive as a dishonest election. Speaker 0 concludes by thanking everyone and suggesting a future meeting.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much for being here. I really believe this is a very sad day for America. Speaker 1: This should never happen. If you challenge an election. You should be able to challenge an election. I thought the election was the rigged election, the stolen election, and I should have every right to do that. As you know, you have many people that You've been watching over the years do the same thing, whether it's Hillary Clinton or Stacey Abrams or many others. When you, To, have that great freedom to challenge, you have to be able to. Otherwise, you could have very dishonest elections. What has taken place is a travesty of justice. We did nothing wrong. I did nothing wrong. And everybody knows it. I've never had such support, and that goes with the other ones 2. What they're doing is election interference. They're trying to interfere with an election. There's never been anything like it in our country before. This is their way of campaigning. This is one instance, but you have 3 other instances. It's election interference. So I wanna thank you for being here. We did nothing wrong at all, and we have every right, every single right to challenge an election that we think is dishonest, that we think is very dishonest. So thank you all very much and I'll see you, very soon. Thank you very much. Alright. Speaker 0: Thank you. Well, I think you pardon yourselves and it comes to you
WayneTechSPFX
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 3:50 PM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 8:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended the ongoing civil fraud trial against Donald Trump in New York, where he faces serious allegations from Attorney General Letitia James regarding financial misrepresentation. The trial has seen various developments, including a limited gag order against Trump for disparaging remarks about court staff. Meanwhile, Trump is also appealing rulings that could affect his eligibility for the 2024 ballot in multiple states. As the legal battles intensify, I remain focused on the implications of these cases for Trump's political future and the broader electoral landscape.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Election interference. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump arrives at New York court for $250 million fraud trial KEY POINTS: The $250 million civil fraud trial that could see Donald Trump permanently banned from doing business in New York has begun. Trump is present in the courtroom in the Manhattan Supreme Court. New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Trump, two of his adult children, the Trump Organization and its top officials of engaging in a yearslong pattern of financial fraud. James alleges the defendants misstated the values of real estate properties by billions of dollars in business records to obtain better loan and insurance terms and tax benefits. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16962612835975&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F10%2F02%2Ftrump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html…

Trump New York fraud trial ends first day with tax accountant testimony New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Donald Trump, the Trump Organization and others of engaging in business fraud for years. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Election interference. Trump. Fraud trial. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump makes a powerful statement upon leaving the courtroom today. Goes in on corrupt deepstate operative Letitia James

Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge's recent comments indicate that about 80% of the case is likely resolved due to the statute of limitations, particularly regarding transactions before 2014. While it's unusual not to have a jury, the judge's acknowledgment of the statute is appreciated. There are no victims in this case; banks profited and were satisfied with their dealings. This situation is seen as political interference in the 2024 presidential election, taking time away from campaigning. The speaker emphasizes the success of their business, which has grown significantly since 2011, and criticizes the New York Attorney General for focusing on this case instead of addressing violent crime in the state.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think that was very good. That last 5 minutes was outstanding because the judge essentially conceded that the statute of intentions that, we wanted the Court of Appeals is in effect. Therefore, about 80% of the case is over. I was going to come out and say that, as you know, we're not entitled to a jury, which is pretty unusual in the United States of America. So I think it's very unfair that I don't have a jury, but the judge's last statement was very fair. And if I read it right, I'll let perhaps one of the lawyers speak to it. But, good night, you'll speak to it if you would. But, the way I interpret that and the way everyone else in the room seems to interpret that is that the statute of limitations is a very real thing in this country. And that would be about 80% that this case would be over. Could somebody speak to that, please? What what we're talking about? Sure. So based on the judge's comments based on the judge's comments at the end of the year, at end of the trial today, it would appear that he is agreeing that all of the transactions that closed prior to 2014 are now out of the case, which is about 80% of the case. And it's also, something that we want on appeal, but was not accepted by this court but now seems to be accepted by this court. As far as the jury is concerned, it's much different now, I must tell you, than it was 20 minutes ago. We're gonna come out and complain that, you know, in this country, you're entitled to a jury. But we very much appreciate the judge's decision today or his statement today on the statute of limitations, which is a very big thing. It's a limited time period, and we did nothing wrong. And if you look at the statements, they show that even in 2011, I I guess the number was 258,000,000 in cash, very strong company. I don't believe we really I wouldn't do a couple of deals or something, but I wouldn't have even needed to go to banks. Banks loved our business. They loved our deals. They weren't defrauded. They lost no money. They made money. They had the finest attorneys that there are. Frankly, their attorneys were better than my attorneys. And, they made a lot of money, and they considered to be a very good client. I paid them back on time, on schedule. There was no default. It never even sent me a default letter. Not once, for years. Never got a default letter. And there's no case here. There's no victim. The banks aren't a victim. The insurance companies are a victim. Everybody gets paid. It's a terrible, terrible thing. This was for politics. Now it has been very successful for them because they took me off the campaign trail. Because I've been sitting in a courthouse all day long instead of being in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, or a lot of other places I could be at. This is a horrible situation for our country. It's never happened before. It's election interference. They're interfering with the presidential election of 2024, and the people of our country see it. But this was a big, big, I I say surprise, but it was a great credit to the court that the judge was willing to do this. Sort of overruled himself, and I greatly respect that. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. Are you back to us? We may. I mean, I'd love that one. I'd love to be campaigning instead of doing this. Because we built I built a great company. That's one thing people are seeing all the way back to 2011. And today, it's much bigger and much better and even much more liquid. That was $258,000,000 for a real estate development. That's a lot of money. It was in 2011. Today, it's much more than that. Much much more. I built a great company and did great things for New York, and they should respect that. I've employed thousands and thousands of people in New York, and they should respect that. The attorney general of this state is a disgrace. Leticia James is a disgrace. She's a disgrace to our country and to the state of New York. She should focus on all of the violent crime and the murders going on in New York, not on somebody that paid back the banks in full without a default, and in many cases, paid it back early. Thank you very much, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Gag. Judge. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump judge issues limited gag order after former president makes disparaging post about court clerk A New York judge placed a limited gag order on Donald J. Trump on Tuesday after the former president posted a message to social media targeting the judge’s law clerk. Mr. Trump attacked the clerk, Allison Greenfield, shortly before noon on his Truth Social site. His post was a picture of Ms. Greenfield with Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic majority leader. Mr. Trump mocked Ms. Greenfield as “Schumer’s girlfriend” and said that the case against him should be dismissed. The post was taken down during a lunch break, shortly after a closed-door meeting in the room where Mr. Trump is being tried. Justice Arthur F. Engoron explained what had happened after the break, though he did not name Ms. Greenfield or Mr. Trump, referring to him only as a defendant. “Personal attacks on my members of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I will not tolerate them under any circumstances,” he said. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/nyregion/trump-gag-order-fraud-trial.html

Trump Ordered Not to Comment on Judge’s Staff in Fraud Case The former president attacked Justice Arthur F. Engoron’s clerk in a social media post that soon disappeared. He was called to account behind closed doors, then chastised in court as the judge issued a limited “gag order.” nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump returns to New York courtroom as civil fraud trial continues Former President Donald Trump is attending his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday, returning to a Manhattan courtroom for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. Trump, two of his sons, and their company were already found liable for fraud in September in the civil suit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The trial is proceeding on several other charges, including falsification of business records and conspiracy. Corrupt NY AG Letiticia James made a video yesterday of new developments in the case Trial Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-trial-new-york-court-civil-fraud-charges/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today marked the start of the third week in the trial against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization. Testimony came from two current employees: an assistant vice president and a hotel division executive. The assistant vice president, responsible for Trump's financial statements, confirmed that Allen Weisselberg indicated Trump wanted his net worth inflated. The hotel executive, a certified public accountant, used these financial statements for reporting to Scottish authorities. He stated that Trump had over $290 million in cash equivalents, but later admitted this figure was likely overstated and he wouldn't have reported it had he known it was inaccurate. The defendants have built their business on falsehoods, and as the judge noted, false statements cannot be used in business.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we started the 3rd week of our trial against Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, and other defendants. We mainly heard testimony from 2 current employees at the Trump Organization, an assistant vice president and an executive in the hotels division. The assistant vice president was responsible for preparing Donald Trump's statements of financial condition. These are the fraudulent documents that at the very center of our case. On the stand today, the assistant vice president was asked if defendant Allen Weisselberg ever told him that mister Trump wanted his net worth to go up on his statements. His answer, yes. Our second witness is an executive in the Trump's Hotels division who has a graduate degree in accounting. He's a certified public accountant. And while he did not work on the statements of financial condition, he relied on them to demonstrate Trump's financials to authorities in Scotland for Trump's properties there. One of the main questions was how much liquidity did Trump have. Based on the statements, this witness told authorities that Trump had cash equivalents in excess of $290,000,000. Asked on the stand about it today, the witness admitted that the number he presented to Scottish tax authorities appears to have been overstated and that he probably would not have presented that number to authorities had he known that it wasn't accurate. For years, the defendants built a business on lies and misrepresentations. To quote the judge and the law, you cannot make false statements and use them in business.
Instead of coming face-to-face with Michael Cohen, Trump confronts emails and spreadsheets at New York trial Former President Donald Trump attended his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Testify. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump to take the stand momentarily I don't watch the fake news media. So this channel I've been subscribed to since day 1 is streaming the event live. He's a patriot. https://www.youtube.com/live/Yv-x1Y6rphU?si=Pz2aWm9ZwqoqGQ5C

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump co-defendant in GA election case Harrison Floyd refusing plea deal. He wants to focus his case on proving Trump won the 2020 election in Georgia.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. TrIal. Alina. Fraud. NYC. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump attorney and spokesperson Alina Habba officially declares plan to file for MISTRIAL in the corrupt AG Octogon member Letitia James' SHAM trial against President Trump

Video Transcript AI Summary
Former President Trump spoke at a rally, expressing that his indictments are a badge of honor and a tactic to discourage voters. He is currently involved in a civil trial in New York, facing a $250 million lawsuit from Attorney General Leticia James for allegedly misleading banks about asset values. Trump's attorney, Alina Haba, discussed a gag order limiting their ability to speak publicly about the case and mentioned plans to file for a mistrial soon. She asserted that Trump's children, who have testified, were not involved in any wrongdoing. Haba criticized James for pursuing the case, suggesting it was politically motivated and detracting from more pressing issues in the city.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Indictment. Even that stupid trial going on in New York, which has been totally discredited. Everybody's been discredited. That's all comes out of the White House. That's to discourage people from voting. That's to hurt us. The only difference is we have a big voice. But every time I'm indicted, I consider it a great badge of honor because I'm being indicted for youth. Speaker 1: And that is former president Trump speaking at a rally in South Florida on Wednesday night on his ongoing legal issues with president Biden's Department of Justice and Democrat prosecutors. The 45th president currently in the middle of a civil trial in New York in which he and his children and the Trump Organization are being sued by the state's attorney general, Leticia James, for $250,000,000 over accusations that they misled banks and others about the value of their assets. James has been front and center at the trial, appearing in the courtroom and holding news conferences at the end of the day, even as violent crime continues to plague everyday New Yorkers. During James' tenure as AG, crime is up 29% in the Big Apple over a 2 year period. While the city saw a 214% spike in anti Semitic crimes last month amid Israel's war against the Hamas terrorists. Joining me right now in this Sunday morning futures exclusive is president Trump's attorney, Alina Haba. Alina, thanks so much for being here today. Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. Speaker 1: So we just heard from, the AG, Leticia James, talking about this trial. Mhmm. She comes out and talks a lot, but president Trump is not allowed to say anything. Speaker 2: Yeah. We have a gag order currently, against certain issues that we can't speak to, and we've seen this on many cases of his. You know, Jack Smith has moved for the same thing. And it's really, you know, it's a first amendment right. He's also a leading candidate. He has a right to speak. He should speak about anybody and anything that he sees that's corrupt. But we do even I have a limited gag order. Speaker 1: You have been complaining about the judge's clerk, and you say that the judge is is compromised, and the clerk appears compromised. Tell me why. Speaker 2: Well, I actually can't tell you why because I'm gagged. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 2: I can tell you that, you know, we'll be filing papers to address all of those issues. And, the fact that, frankly, Maria, I can't even discuss it with you, and I'm his spokeswoman, I'm his attorney, says a lot about what the judicial system the state of our judicial system right now. Speaker 1: I I think I I did see that there were donations that the clerk had given very supportive to the Democrats. That was one issue. Are you going to file to get a mistrial? Yes. When will you do that? Today? Speaker 2: Soon. Yeah. Very soon. Speaker 1: Okay. And and and how would that change things? Then you go from day 1, you start over again. Speaker 2: You know, the problem is with all of these things, such as filing a motion for recusal, which we've done twice, is that this judge has to be the one that decides, is he going to recuse himself? Does he feel that there was a mistrial? It's a bench trial. We have one judge, and it's the same judge that issued the gag order that has to make those determinations. So at this point, you know, I don't have, any reason to believe he shouldn't after what we've we've learned, if it's true. But I will tell you that it's concerning when he is the arbiter and the decision maker of of some of these issues. Speaker 1: These accusations that he overvalued his assets, what kind of third party people did you have or did Donald Trump have in terms of doing their own evaluation? Because, I mean, when you go to get deals, you have to get auditors to to to okay the valuations that you put in. Right? Right. Did he have auditors to Speaker 2: do that? He had an accounting firm put together what's a compilation. The compilation they were involved with, they were there all the time communicating with the Trump Organization. They put their stamp of approval on it. And then there was this disclaimer that everybody always puts on and says, hey. Do your own work. The disclaimer is very important. Remember, there was nobody harmed. These are sophisticated lenders. Deutsche Bank, you know, major major establishments with all kinds of regulations, KYC, FEC regulations. These people take somebody's numbers. They don't use them. They do their own due diligence, and they weren't harmed. They were paid on time. They were paid with interest. They made money. But Laticia James is putting her nose into private companies and private, individuals' work, which is not what's meant to happen. And the law that she's using is a consumer fraud law so that she can establish some way to have control, to not have a jury, to do certain things in this case that are nonsensical and shouldn't be happening. And we've been fighting it all along the way. The problem we have is the judge is the one that's gonna make those decisions, and he's proven himself to be quite motivated by the other side. Speaker 1: And you think he's compromised as well? Speaker 2: I'm not gonna speak to that, but we'll see. Speaker 1: Yeah. The president's children have testified. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: Ivanka, Don Junior, and Eric Trump as well. Don Junior speaking again tomorrow. Correct? What have they been asking the kids? And tell me how they fit into all of this. Speaker 2: They don't fit into all of this. What have they been asking the kids is very simple. They'll they'll ask the kids, did you give a value to somebody? Did you do something? And everybody said resoundingly, no. The kids were not involved. I believe that when they crafted this complaint, they looked at their titles and they looked at, frankly, PR. And if you patch in the kids, it's more days that Letitia James can go out there and speak. It's more more press for her, and it's more of an impact. Radical left liberals don't really care about facts. They don't care about law. They care about making statements, and these kids did nothing wrong. They should not be in this case. Ivanka's already out of the case. The boys should not be in the case. Their testimony was direct, and they just wanna make it as if there was some sort of corruption and some sort of conspiracy. There was none. There was an accounting firm. There were lawyers, and there were sophisticated lenders that all did their job, and nobody got harmed. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: But miss James wanted a headline. She campaigned on this, remember, before she was even the attorney general. That's how she got the attorney general role. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: She campaigned on Trump, so she had to follow through. And she should really dismiss this case. It's a little bad, frankly, and the city needs her attention elsewhere. Speaker 1: Alina, we're gonna be waiting and watching for your filings for a mistrial likely later today. Thank you for being here. Speaker 2: Thank you for having me.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Georgia. Election interference. Plea deals. Cabal intel: #BREAKING 4 days ago, Reverend Stephen Cliffgard Lee, one of 18 Trump's co-defendants, declared that he is not ACCEPTING a plea deal in the case initiated by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. "I am not going to plead out to a lie." "I'm not going to cooperate with evil. This is bigger than me." Now, this is how you stand up to cabal! Not like the other deepstate cabal traitors! He faces 5yrs in prison if convicted. I hope he has a legal donation fund setup! Instead of donating to these deepstate cabal Republicans who don't do a damn thing but talk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee from Orland Park, charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, announced he will not accept a plea deal. At a fundraiser for his legal fees, he stated he refuses to cooperate with what he calls "evil," unlike others who have taken plea deals for lighter sentences. If convicted, he faces a minimum of five years in a Georgia state prison.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And died along with former president Donald Trump in Georgia's election tampering case. He says he will not take a plea deal. Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee of Orland Park charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Chicago Tribune reports at a fundraiser for his legal fees last night, Lee says he'd not take a plea as others have done resulting in less severe penalties. He says, quote, I'm not going to cooperate with evil. He says if convicted, he faces a minimum of 5 years in a Georgia state prison.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election fraud. Ballots. Georgia. MI intel: #BREAKING 3600 duplicate Ballots of the 2020 election found in Fulton County #FultonCounty | #Georgia Trump delivered the news via Truth Social. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Law-fare. Octogon. Alina. MI intel: #VIDEO Alina Habba goes on a truth diatribe stating that Trump has already sued and won members of the cabal, including Hillary, members of the FBI, etc.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I won a court case against President Trump six months ago, which many may not know. The media, which I refer to as fake news, often misrepresents the truth. Trump has sued various parties, including Hillary Clinton and members of the FBI, over the Russia investigation. Despite being impeached twice, he remains resilient. Now, with multiple indictments, I’m focused on how to respond to the next one. The media aims to instill fear and distract supporters, but we are doing well. The current battle is not just political but legal, and it’s crucial to recognize that we are still in a strong position.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Who here knows that president Trump and I beat him in court 6 months ago when he sued him? You didn't know that either, did you? So I'm here to send you one very loud message. What the fake news covers and by the way, the fake news is everyone. Okay? Just because I go on Fox, just because I go on those stations, doesn't mean they're pro Trump. They're pro ratings. So let's be clear. Those are 2 big cases. You had no idea that President Trump sued Hillary Clinton. You had no idea that he sued members of the FBI. He sued everyone that came after him for Russia hoax. He was impeached once. They made it stronger. Impeached twice, he stayed. He was fine. And now we got how many indictments? I'm losing count. But you know what I care about more? What am I gonna say when we go to indictment number 4? It's fine. Bring it. Bring it. End of the day, here's the truth. The wins, they won't tell you because they want you to be scared. They want you to be worried that you're backing people that have no shot, and they wanna distract you. They give you clips. They give you sound bites, but I'm there. And unfortunately for president Trump, it's a sad day when he has to make his lawyer his spokesperson. But that is what the war is now. It's no longer warfare. It's lawfare. That's what we're dealing with. So let me just make sure you all understand something very clearly. We're doing well.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. J6. Fraud. Courts. Appeal. SC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid his appeal to dismiss Judge Chutkan put a pause on Trump's case until the Supreme Court decides whether to weigh in The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court, and put a pause on the case against the Republican 2024 frontrunner until the high court determines its involvement. Special Counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted on charges relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump said he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to reverse that outcome. Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court — the usual next step in the process — and have the Supreme Court take up the matter directly. Late Monday, the Supreme Court asked Trump’s lawyers to respond to the special counsel's motion by Wednesday, Dec. 20 — two days later than Smith had requested. Lawyers for Trump filed a motion Tuesday urging Judge Tanya Chutkan to pause proceedings against Trump in the Jan. 6 case while his appeal is pending. The trial was set to begin March 4, but now that start date could be delayed. Chutkan said that she would reconsider the trial date at the completion of the appeals process. Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-pauses-jan-6-case-against-trump-amid-former-presidents-appeal-dismiss

Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid former president's appeal to dismiss The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy Giuliani. Lawsuit. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani’s defamatory statements about them following the 2020 election. What to know about Rudy Giuliani’s defamation trial: •The jury delivered its verdict Friday afternoon in Rudy Giuliani's civil defamation trial related to false claims he made about two former election workers in Georgia. •Jurors awarded the plaintiffs Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss $148.17 million total in damages. •Freeman and Moss asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani's defamatory statements about them following the 2020 presidential contest when he baselessly accused them of election fraud. U.S. District Judge •Beryl Howell, who is overseeing the trial, ruled this year that Giuliani defamed the two women with his remarks. •Trial testimony this week lasted four days. Giuliani reversed course yesterday and said he would not take the stand in his defense, despite saying earlier that his testimony would make "definitively clear" that what he said about Freeman and Moss "was true." •The jury began deliberating yesterday afternoon following closing arguments in the case. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/live-blog/rcna129882?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17026806140030&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Flive-blog%2Frudy-giuliani-trial-verdict-defamation-live-updates-rcna129882

Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case: Recap Latest news and updates as a jury deliberates on the damages Giuliani will face for defaming two Georgia election workers following the 2020 election. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#AMERICAUNDERATTACK Trump. Election interference. Colorado. President. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former President Donald Trump can not appear on the state's ballots for the 2024 election due to his incitement of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, reversing a lower court ruling. But the state Supreme Court stayed its ruling from taking effect until Jan. 4, "subject to further appellate proceedings." The cabal is setting the stage for the steal. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/12/19/trump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17030279636160&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F12%2F19%2Ftrump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html

Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado court ruling barring Donald Trump from ballots in the state is the first time a court has rule he is disqualified for engaging in insurrection. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump team issued a statement on the Colorado decision

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy. Bankruptcy. Lawsuits. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million. Rudy files chapter 11 bankruptcy U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. Former Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss can immediately seek enforcement of their $146 million financial judgment against Rudy Giuliani because there is good reason to assume he will not comply, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. “Giuliani’s failure to ‘satisfy even more modest monetary awards entered earlier in this case,’ provides good cause to believe that he will seek to dissipate or conceal his assets during the 30-day period,” U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell wrote in her order. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna130719?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_ct=1703179669900&_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17031796416523&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fdonald-trump%2Fjudge-orders-rudy-giuliani-start-paying-georgia-election-workers-146-m-rcna130719

Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, lists $500M in debts after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. Giuliani, who was once hailed as “America’s Mayor,” listed debts of up to $500 million with assets of only $10 million in the filing, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday. I've repeatedly stated that they're setting up the steal again. Look around. The Dominion systems will still be in use. They've convicted a good portion of the J6ers. They've indicted Trump with election fraud. They've indicted those supposedly who were close to him, and many of those pled guilty and will testify against him. They've taken Trump off the ballot in Colorado pending appeal, with more states to follow. Do you get it yet? Source: https://nypost.com/2023/12/21/news/rudy-giuliani-files-for-bankruptcy-in-ny/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, owes up to $500M after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. nypost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Election interference. Michigan. SC. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The Michigan Supreme Court has declined to hear a case arguing that former President Donald Trump should be excluded from the state's primary ballot, meaning the frontrunner for the GOP nomination will remain a listed candidate. The order issued Wednesday is in line with lower court rulings in Michigan, though at odds with a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court. Source: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/12/27/michigan-supreme-court-trump-stays-primary-ballot/72037140007/

Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The argument over whether Trump is an eligible candidate center around whether his conduct around the 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol was insurrection. freep.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Escalation. Trump. Election interference. Ballots. Maine. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Resubscribe POLITICS Biden administration The Fix The 202s Polling Democracy in America Election 2024 DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state By Patrick Marley Updated December 29, 2023 at 1:29 a.m. EST|Published December 28, 2023 at 6:58 p.m. EST Maine on Dec. 28 became the second state to ban former president Donald Trump from its primary ballot due to his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state under a part of the U.S. Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. The Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case, which could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again. Both states have temporarily paused their decisions so Trump can pursue appeals. Developing... Keep a close eye on the Supreme Court. Hopefully, the global cabal blackmail group doesn't get to them. Based on their decision. We'll either know they're working with military intelligence[MI] or not. I was always taught. Hope for the best. Expect the worst. I don't trust anyone working in these cabal controlled institutions. There's a reason why the dems chose state Sen. Shenna Bellows as their new Secretary of State in Maine. She was the first-ever ranked-choice vote as the first woman to hold the position. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/28/maine-trump-primary-ballot/

Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine is the second state to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Republican. Deepstate. Trump. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Vivek Ramaswamy believes the Republican establishment is rooting for Trump to be forcibly removed from the ballot so they can prop up their chosen candidate. He stated that any state Trump is being removed from that the republican contenders for president should also remove their names from the ballot. If they don't, they are in on it, too. Lately, Vivek has been on a roll releasing comms. As I've been saying for this past year. The proof is in the pudding. Dominion, through actionable court proceedings, won their lawsuit against FOX, and many others stated that their voting machines were good. Courts agreed. Thus, they will continue to use the same systems. In the election fraud case in Georgia, many of the Trump team loyalists have pleaded guilty and decided to testify against Trump. That case and several others against Trump are coming up in a few short months. The precedent for those cases rests in the current Georgia case. I have a feeling that Trump will provide irrefutable evidence at these trials proving his innocence. Now, if the jury/judge decides to convict anyway, this will be another stolen election. I'm praying that it won't. But I am prepared if it does. So should you. Vivek is telling you right here:

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot, I will also withdraw my candidacy and challenge Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, and Ron DeSantis to do the same. If all Republicans in Maine step back, it will halt the interference in our GOP primary. Their refusal to act suggests a deeper issue, revealing a faction within the Republican establishment that supports this outcome as much as the Democrats do. We need to recognize this troubling game. I'm concerned that this is just the beginning of their plans for 2024. The system is determined to eliminate Trump from the election, as seen in recent events in Colorado and Maine. We should be worried about what lies ahead for our country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any state where Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot in this way, I'll also remove myself. And I challenge Chris Christie and Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis to do the same thing, or else they're also complicit. If every Republican removes themselves from the ballot in Maine, that automatically stops the selection interference in our GOP primary. Now the fact that they're not doing it reveals that there's something deeper going on. This isn't just the Democrats. There's a force within the Republican establishment that's propped up a chosen puppet, and they're actually rooting for this same outcome every bit as much as the Democrats are. And I think it's time we open our eyes to this insidious game that's being played. I'm deeply worried, but I'm worried that I'm right about this. That what we're seeing right now, this isn't the end of the road. This is just the beginning of what they're planning to pull in 2024. And you mark my words on that. This is the a system that has decided by hell or high water at one cost or another, they will eliminate this man from contention in this election. You see that happening Colorado 2 days ago, Maine today. You wait for what's happening in 2024, and I'm worried for this country found it on.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeal. J6. Maine. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. President Donald Trump on Tuesday filed an appeal of the decision by Maine’s top election official that he is ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot. “[T]he Secretary’s Ruling was the product of a process infected by bias and pervasive lack of due process; is arbitrary, capricious, and characterized by abuse of discretion,” Trump's attorneys wrote in the appeal. Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, ruled last week that the former president is constitutionally barred from appearing on the state’s primary ballot, citing his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. But Bellows’ office said her decision would not be enforced until the courts weigh in. Maine’s Republican primary is March 5. In her 34-page decision, Bellows wrote that Trump’s conduct around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol compelled her to rule him ineligible. “The weight of the evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump was aware of the tinder laid by his multi-month effort to delegitimize a democratic election, and then chose to light a match,” she wrote, adding that he “used a false narrative of election fraud to inflame his supporters and direct them to the Capitol to prevent certification of the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power.” In an interview with NBC News last month, Bellows said her preference would have been to wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the matter, which centers on the 14th Amendment, but she believed Maine law required her to act now. “The country would be well served if the United States Supreme Court issues clear guidance on this unprecedented constitutional question for all to follow,” Bellows said. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-challenge-maine-ruling-2024-primary-ballot-appeal-rcna131761

Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Fraud trial. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump makes closing arguments at the conclusion of the fraud case in New York City. No jury. Only a judge will render the verdict in the case. Hopefully, by the end of business day today, or tmr morning. 1 down. 3 cases to go. Video credit: wehaveitall

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've faced years of politically motivated attacks from the New York Attorney General, who campaigned on targeting me. Despite millions of pages of documents and extensive litigation, they lack evidence against us. The only witness they have is a convicted felon who has recanted his statements. We've already won in the Court of Appeals, but the judge has been slow to acknowledge that. This case is unprecedented, using a consumer fraud statute inappropriately, and feels like a witch hunt and election interference. Despite these challenges, our poll numbers are strong, and the American people understand the situation. Thank you for your support.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Yeah. We've gone through years with, this person. She's a political hack, the attorney general. The judge is obviously extremely friendly with the group, and we'll see, what happens. I think maybe, they surprise people on a positive side. We'll have to see what happens exactly. But, we've proven this case so conclusively. We've asked for directed verdict many times. They don't have any facts. They don't have any evidence against us. Millions and millions of pages, years of litigation, and all politically motivated. She campaigned on a I will get Trump. If you've ever seen any of the, seen any of her clips, they're horrible clips, actually, the anger. She's got serious drug derangement syndrome. There's no question about Leticia James, the corrupt attorney general of New York. So we've proven our case. Is not one witness against us other than one person who is a, deranged. He's got a lot of problems. He's a man who's been convicted of lying. He's a felon convicted felon and, not a good person, but that's their only witness, and he's now crashed and burned. They have no witnesses. And, by the way, that witness took back everything that he said. He took back everything he said in court. Took it all back. So they have no case. It's a shame that a thing like this is able to happen. Businesses leave New York. She went after Exxon, and they decided to move to Texas. And, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars they pay in taxes. I paid over $300,000,000 of taxes over the last number of years. 300,000,000 and, they don't recognize that. They don't recognize anything. So not think of it. Not one witness, millions of pages of document, years of this nonsense, and now it goes on. And one other factor, we won this case already in the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals voted in favor of us, but this judge has been very, very slow to accept that opinion because that's not the opinion that he wants. But we won in the Court of Appeals. That's the boss of this judge who has to know that. And there was a conclusive victory, statute of limitations and other things, and that case has already been won. So that's the story, and I thought we'd come down to 40 Wall Street, which is a great building, and you'd get a chance to see one of the nicest buildings in New York at a convenient place. And I don't have to pay any rent because we have it and it's been a very successful building. But it's a shame to have to have gone through this for years years years. And now we'll see if we're gonna get an honest verdict. We didn't have a jury. We had no rights to a jury. It's a statute that's never been used before for a purpose like this. I just watched a certain broadcast and they said, you know, they've been looking. Has it ever been used before? This is a statute that's a consumer fraud statute. Never been used for anything like this before, and it's a shame. It's, it's really a, it's a witch hunt in the truest sense of the word. It's election interference. And, it just came out. I just it was just right now, Leticia James visited Joe Biden in the White House numerous times during the Trump witch hunt, and this just came out about 10 minutes ago. I got it. And so it's all it's all a conspiracy to try and get Biden who can't put 2 sentences together trying to get him into office. So I just wanna let you know that, we have our best poll numbers. We have the best everything despite this, and maybe because of this. Because the people of the United States, all of those people back there, but the people of the United States really get it. They get it better than anybody else. Yeah. Please. Right. President Trump, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Charges. Ballots. Supreme Court. Election intel: #BREAKING TRUMP TO SC: "All presidents must have complete & total presidential immunity, or the authority & decisiveness of a President of the United States will be stripped & gone forever. Hopefully, this will be an easy decision. God bless the Supreme Court!"

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

RNC. Resolution. Haley. Trump. Election intel: #BREAKING RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. The Republican National Committee (RNC) is reviewing a draft resolution that, if approved, would declare Donald Trump the party’s presumptive 2024 presidential nominee even as Nikki Haley continues to wage a vigorous campaign against the former president and frontrunner. The draft resolution, obtained by The Dispatch Thursday morning, was proposed by David Bossie, an RNC committeeman from Maryland and close Trump ally. His effort to put the national party on a general election footing behind Trump follows RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel saying after the former president defeated Haley in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary that it was time for Republicans to unite behind the frontrunner and focus on defeating Joe Bidan. “RESOLVED that the Republican National Committee hereby declares President Trump as our presumptive 2024 nominee for the office of President of the United States and from this moment forward moves into full general election mode welcoming supporters of all candidates as valued members of Team Trump 2024,” reads a key portion of the draft resolution. Under current RNC rules, Trump still has to win the requisite number of nominating convention delegates—1,215—to become the party’s unchallenged presumptive nominee. After the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, Trump leads Haley in the race for delegates 32 to 17. But passage of this resolution, possibly next week at the RNC winter meeting in Las Vegas, could begin a preemptive process of the national party working with the former president as if he had already done so. And under RNC rules, that is permissible. This resolution, even in draft form, also functions as another sign that the GOP establishment is anxious to coalesce behind Trump and put an end to a presidential primary that, after his victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, the former president looks poised to win. Developing... Source: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-politics/rnc-moving-to-declare-trump-its-presumptive-nominee/

RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. - Start a free trial today for full access. thedispatch.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Lawsuit. Trials. Jury. COMMS. Defamation. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury just ruled that Donald Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages The nine-person jury began deliberations in federal court in New York at 1:40 p.m. ET and reached a verdict in just under three hours. The award included $11 million for damage to Carroll's reputation, $7.3 million for emotional harm and other damages, and $65 million in punitive damages. The decision came after contentious closing arguments that saw Trump storm out of the courtroom. He returned for his own attorney's closing arguments but left the courthouse at 4 p.m. before the jury returned its verdict. He posted about it on his social media platform on Truth Social a short time later. "Absolutely ridiculous!" he wrote, adding he would be appealing. "They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!" Carroll did not comment as she left the courthouse. The cabal has done this to use as Cannon fodder to try and use against him this election. They all need talking points, including Haley. This is also comms to let other juries know how to proceed in Trump’s other upcoming trials this year. As I've stated countless times concerning Trump’s trials. He's going to present all of the evidence in the world that can't be refuted. One of 2 things will happen. Out of all of the scenarios, the world will learn the truth about the election and J6, etc. First scenario. He'll get convicted anyway despite showing all of the evidence. That'll be the 1st marker for MI. Sparking what is to come. 2nd scenario, he's found innocent and vindicated of everything. Then Cabal goes into survival mode. All ops will get escalated globally, sparking the 2nd marker. Both scenarios will spark ops. Get ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/verdict-reached-e-jean-carrolls-defamation-damages-trial-trump-rcna135919

Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages, jury finds Former President Donald Trump must pay writer E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her, a jury found Friday. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. E. Jean Carroll. Epstein. Theater. Actors. COMMS. Cabal intel: #REPORT E. Jean Carroll named the mice that runs around her blue & white striped house that she named the 'Mouse House. She also has a dog named “Tits,” and paints rocks and trees blue in her backyard that runs by a river. What does her house remind you of? These are comms. These are criminals. They are cabal.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some distinguished mice live here. Kahneman is in the kitchen, and Taborski is in the bedroom. This is my shed, and on the door is a list of my dogs: Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. I was horrified to see the dry streams and rivers, which inspired me to paint the rocks blue to show where the water once flowed. After painting the rocks, I moved on to paint the trees, and soon I had painted the entire forest.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taborski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door of the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest. That's because some very distinguished, mice live here.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. IRS. Taxes. Elon. Leaks. MI intel: #BREAKING Ex-IRS Contractor Who Leaked Trump, Griffin Tax Data Gets Five Years in Prison A former Internal Revenue Service contractor who stole and leaked the tax returns of former President Donald Trump, Ken Griffin, Elon Musk, and other billionaires was sentenced to five years in prison. Charles Littlejohn, 38, had pleaded guilty Oct. 12 to stealing Trump’s tax data from the IRS and leaking it to the New York Times. He also admitted taking tax information about thousands of other wealthy Americans, including Jeff Bezos, that he passed to ProPublica. The judge called it the biggest heist in IRS history and “an intolerable attack on our democracy. Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-29/irs-leaker-of-trump-griffin-tax-data-gets-five-years-in-prison?embedded-checkout=true

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Bidan. Carroll. Election intel: #REPORT Carroll: "I'll do everything I can" to help Bidan beat Trump in 2024.” This means she'll lie, cheat, and steal.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The idea is that when you confront Donald Trump, he appears as just a man without power. His influence comes from the people around him who support him. This concept is similar to Hans Christian Andersen's tale, "The Emperor's New Clothes," where the emperor's power is an illusion created by his followers. Currently, Trump is campaigning for president again and polling suggests a tight race. There hasn't been communication from Joe Biden's campaign about facing Trump, but there is a willingness to engage if necessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That when you've actually faced the man, he's just a man with no clothes on. Yeah. It's the people around him that are giving him the power. What do you mean by that? Speaker 1: Well, Hans Christian Andersen's great fairy tale, the emperor has no clothes, that is written about Donald Trump. It's just we're the ones who clothe him in all this power. He has none himself. It's his followers. It's his hangers on. In the court, they were strutting back and forth and handing him messages. It was right, Robbie? Miss Scott, Speaker 2: you say it's nothing. You say the emperor has no clothes. The emperor is trying to run for president Yeah. Again. Speaker 1: And And right now is leading. Speaker 2: And right now, the polls suggest it's a coin flip. It's very close. Have you heard from Joe Biden's campaign arm about potentially campaigning against the former president Donald Trump? No. Are you interested in doing so? Speaker 1: Do anything I can. Speaker 2: That's a yes. Speaker 0: What was it? Said that

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Appeals. Judges. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump D.C. trial drops off court’s March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case Administrative move comes as anticipation mounts over how — and when — an appeals court will decide former president’s claim of immunity from criminal prosecution. President Donald Trump’s March 4 trial date on charges of plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election has been dropped from the public calendar of the federal court in Washington, a sign of what has long been anticipated — that his claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution would delay his trial while it remains on appeal. The change did not appear on the official criminal case docket before the U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who has made clear since Trump filed his appeal on Dec. 7 that all trial deadlines would be suspended while he challenges the case. On appeal, Trump is arguing that the government does not have authority under the Constitution to bring charges against him for actions he took while president after the 2020 election through the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, when he attempted to prevent Congress from confirming Joe Biden’s election victory. A delay in the D.C. case makes it increasingly likely that the first of Trump’s four criminal trials could be held this spring in Manhattan on New York state charges of business fraud in connection with hush money payments during the 2016 election. That trial has nominally been set for March 25, but the court, in that case, has signaled deference to Trump’s federal election subversion case. New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has scheduled a pretrial hearing in two weeks — Feb. 15 — and is expected to decide after that if the trial will go forward as planned. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/

Trump’s D.C. trial removed from March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case A delay in Trump’s case in D.C. makes it likely that the first of his four criminal trials could be his New York state prosecution accusing him of business fraud. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. FOIA. DOJ. FBI. Fraud. Ballots. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Brand new FOIA documents just uncovered reveals that the DOJ and FBI uncovered alarming 2020 election ballot fraud in Detroit, Michigan, and covered it up In the emails, a DOJ official says, "This allegation, and accompanying photos, is alarming. I would like FBI to look into this, please." Someone at the Michigan Attorney General's office also responded to the complaint, "Talked to the FBI on this and it's not going to be in their lane or ours in terms of apparent criminal actions, but MDOS[Michigan Department of State] may want to call and try and head this off." Source: yehuda_miller

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Federal. Appeals. Courts. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claim that he was immune to charges of plotting to subvert the results of the 2020 election, ruling that he must go to trial on a criminal indictment accusing him of seeking to overturn his loss to President Biden. The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed Mr. Trump was a significant defeat, but it was unlikely to be the final word on his claims of executive immunity. Mr. Trump, who is on a path to locking up the Republican presidential nomination, is expected to continue his appeal to the Supreme Court. Still, the panel’s 57-page ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? Trump will file an appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump is now in the cabal playing field. Brace yourselves this year, guys. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/trump-immunity-appeals-court.html

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Judge. Rulings. Octigon intel: #BREAKING Judge set to rule in Trump's $370 million civil fraud case A New York state judge is expected to rule on Friday in a $370 million civil fraud case against former U.S. President Donald Trump, who is accused of inflating his net worth to dupe bankers into giving him better loan terms. Justice Arthur Engoron's ruling could deal a major blow to Trump's real estate empire as the businessman turned politician seeks the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election. The lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accused Trump and his family businesses of overstating his net worth by as much $3.6 billion a year over a decade. Trump has denied wrongdoing and called the case a political vendetta by James, an elected Democrat. In addition to monetary penalties, James is seeking to permanently ban Trump from New York's real estate industry and sharply limit his ability to do business in the state. She is also seeking five-year industry bans for Trump's two adult sons, Don Jr. And Eric, who are also defendants in the case. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-set-rule-trumps-370-million-civil-fraud-case-2024-02-16/#:~:text=Justice%20Arthur%20Engoron's%20ruling%20could,the%20Nov.%205%20U.S.%20election.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Judge orders Trump and his companies to pay more than $350 million in the New York civil case. Bars Trump from running businesses in the city for three years.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Motion. Judge. Carroll. COMMS. Octogon intel: #UPDATE Judge Denies Trump’s Delayed Payment Request In E. Jean Carroll Case The New York judge who oversaw E. Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump rejected the former president’s request to delay paying Carroll more than $80 million in damages, according to a Sunday court filing. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, requested an “administrative stay” on Friday to pause Trump’s required payments to Carroll after he made defaming statements against the former writer in 2019. Kaplan said Sunday he would not grant a pause without allowing Carroll and her team to respond and gave them until Thursday at 5 p.m. to respond to Trump’s motion. In Habba’s Friday motion, she asked Kaplan to stay the motion for at least 30 days until Trump’s post-trial motions were resolved, claiming there was a “strong probability” the verdict could be reduced or eliminated on appeal. If they're giving Trump and attorneys a hard time now in just civil suits. Just imagine what they're going to do in the criminal trials. This corrupt 2-tiered justice system is designed to railroad those the cabal wants locked up. It doesn't make a difference how much money a person may have. Sometimes, it does in rare cases. Be prepared for what is to come. https://www.msn.com/en-US/finance/-companies/judge-denies-trumps-delayed-payment-request-in-e-jean-carroll-case/ar-BB1iRzRB?ocid=sapphireappshare

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Interest. Bankrupt. Orders. Civil. COMMS. Octogon intel: #BREAKING $100 MILLION in interest added to Trump's judgment accruing interest at $100k daily In New York, former President Donald Trump's bills are racking up. The judgment in his civil fraud trial was officially entered with the court today — $454,156,783.05 for him alone, plus Trump is now accruing over $100,000 of post-judgment interest each day. This is on top of the recent $83.3 million verdict against him in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial. Trump and the other defendants in the civil fraud case — his sons Donald Jr. and Eric Trump and two other Trump Organization executives — have 30 days to appeal the decision by Judge Arthur Engoron, which found them liable for fraud for misrepresenting the value of Trump properties. The message is loud and clear. The Octogon intends to bankrupt Trump. Usually, in civil cases. The lawyers tie up litigation on appeals for years. Not in Trump's cases. They want the full amount in 30 days or face hefty interest, fines, penalties, and possible jail time. Next up is Trump's criminal cases. Where he faces decades in prison. Be prepared for what is to come. Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-civil-fraud-judgment-over-450-million-100000-interest-per-day/

Trump's civil fraud judgment is officially over $450 million, and climbing over $100,000 per day The amount former President Donald Trump owes in his New York civil fraud case is $454,156,783 — plus $111,983 of post-judgment interest accruing each day. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Properties. Assets. Seizure. COMMS. Financial. NY. Octogon intel: #REPORT Attorney General Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trump's assets if he can't pay his $354 million civil fraud fine.

Video Transcript AI Summary
New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that if Trump cannot pay the over $300 million in penalties from his civil fraud trial, they will seek court enforcement to seize his assets. This includes significant properties like 40 Wall Street. Trump will need to post a bond within the next 25 days, which involves cash and rights to some properties. He has the option to appeal the verdict, but ultimately, he must pay whatever amount is determined. If he cannot provide the cash, prosecutors will proceed to seize and liquidate his assets to satisfy the judgment owed to the state of New York.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the New York attorney general Letitia James told ABC News she is going to do if Trump cannot afford to pay the 300,000,000 plus in penalties from his civil fraud trial? Here's what she said. Speaker 1: If he does not have funds, to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment enforcement mechanisms in court. And we will ask the judge to seize his assets. Speaker 0: Those assets include big buildings here in New York City, including, she talked a bit about, 40 Wall Street. Is that what would play out here normally for someone, and do you see this happening? Speaker 2: Yeah. So this is the way it will go, Poppy. First of all, Donald Trump, within the next 25 days or so, is gonna post a bond, meaning some cash element plus the deeds, the rights to some of his properties, including potentially some of those buildings. Then Donald Trump will have the right to appeal, of course. And whatever comes out of that appeal, whatever's left of this verdict, maybe all $350 +1000000, maybe some smaller number, maybe none of it. But whatever comes out of it, Donald Trump then has to pay. This is not negotiable. This will be a judgment owed not to individuals but to the state of New York. And Right. If he cannot put up cash to satisfy that judgment, then the next move that a prosecutor makes is you seize and liquidate assets until you get up to that number.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeals. NY. Courts. Patriot intel: #UPDATE Donald Trump appeals $454 million loss in New York real estate fraud case President Donald Trump filed an appeal Monday against the dramatic $454 million court loss he suffered in a New York real estate fraud case. Trump's liability includes penalties of about $355 million plus interest that started running at different times for different Trump properties. Interest will continue accumulating at 9% a year until the judgment is paid under state law. Trump filed the appeal document Monday along with his two oldest sons, former Trump Organization executives, and several business entities. Although Trump didn't lay out his appellate arguments on Monday, legal experts expect he will argue that the fraud he was found liable for didn't involve traditional victims. James made the case that Trump inflated his net worth to get better loan terms, but the lenders themselves haven't sued Trump alleging they were harmed by the inflation. "We trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious fine and take the necessary steps to restore the public faith in New York’s legal system," Trump lawyer Alina Habba said in a statement Monday. I have his appeal pdf file. it's 102pgs long. If his appeal is accepted or rejected. Will set a precedent on how Trump’s other cases play out this year. Source: usatoday

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Pause. Judgment. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump cannot line up full bond in New York fraud case, offers to post $100 million Donald Trump on Wednesday lost a bid to pause a $454.2 million civil fraud judgment against him for overstating his net worth and real estate values to dupe lenders, meaning he must soon find the cash or post a bond to prevent New York authorities from seizing his property while he appeals. The decision by Associate Justice Anil Singh of the New York Appellate Division must be affirmed by a full panel of the mid-level state appeals court. Singh granted Trump's request for a stay of a portion of Justice Arthur Engoron's Feb. 16 decision barring the former president from running any New York corporation or seeking loans from the state's banks for three years. In asking for the stay earlier on Wednesday, Trump's lawyers said he is unable to post a bond for the full amount of the judgment while he appeals and wants instead to secure a $100 million bond. A bonding company would be on the hook for any payout if Trump loses his appeal and proves unable to pay. In their filing with the Appellate Division, Trump's lawyers said a stay of Engoron's decision was needed because Trump would suffer "irreparable harm" if James were free to sell his real estate assets to raise capital to pay the judgment. The lawyers also said the "exorbitant and punitive amount of the judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure and post a complete bond." They said a $100 million bond, together with Trump's "vast" real estate holdings and ongoing oversight by a court-designated monitor for the Trump Organization, would be more than sufficient to secure the judgment. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cannot-line-up-full-bond-new-york-fraud-case-offers-post-100-mln-2024-02-28/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Illinois. Eligibility. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Illinois judge says 14th Amendment bars Trump from 2024 primary ballot A judge in Cook County, Illinois, on Wednesday ruled that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the "insurrection clause," bars former President Donald Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot. The order overrules a January determination from the Illinois State Board of Elections that Trump could remain eligible. Cook County Circuit Judge Tracie Porter placed an immediate stay on her decision until March 1 "in anticipation of an appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, or the Illinois Supreme Court." Trump plans to appeal the ruling, a source familiar confirms. The Supreme Court is currently debating Trumps appeal. The ultimate ruling from the SC will also set the precedent on how things will play out for the rest of this year. I personally don't think it'll be great news. I really hope I'm wrong. The precedent will be set either way. Developing...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on whether former President Trump can be barred from reelection under the 14th Amendment. Trump's attorney contends that he is not an elected official or an officer of the United States, arguing that Section 3 applies only to those in office, not candidates. He warned that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the ballot could disenfranchise millions of voters. Conversely, the plaintiff's attorney claims Trump disqualified himself by attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power through insurrection. The court's decision will ultimately address Trump's eligibility in light of these allegations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To the US Supreme Court hearing arguments on whether former president Trump could be barred from reelection under the 14th amendment. Trump's attorney argued the former president is not covered under section 3 as an elected official, claiming also that he's not an officer of the United States. He also said that section 3 can't apply to a candidate only to those who hold office. He said that if the US Supreme Court affirms the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, which removed Trump from the ballot in that state, that it would, quote, take away votes of potentially tens of millions of Americans. The plaintiff's attorney argued that president Trump disqualified himself by trying to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power by engaging in insurrection against the constitution. He says that ultimately is this court's, is what this court is going to decide, and it's the question of whether Trump's eligibility holds amid that issue for the country. So let's bring in senior national correspondent Terry Moran outside the Supreme Court, ABC News Supreme Court contributor Kate Shaw, and ABC News executive editorial producer

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE This could be game over: Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case The justices agreed on Wednesday to decide whether Trump enjoys "total immunity" from prosecution. The timing of that decision likely means a trial over Trump's role in Jan. 6 won't begin — much less end — before the election. There's nothing Trump wants more in this case than a delay. If he wins in November and hasn't been tried before Inauguration Day, there's a good chance he never will be. "This could well be game over," election law expert Rick Hasen. Trump's first briefs are due to the high court in about three weeks. Oral arguments will be in late April. That sets the stage for a ruling in late June, at the end of the court's term. That's about as fast as the Supreme Court is capable of moving. The justices have kept the actual trial on ice in the meantime. The fundamental issue in this case — whether presidents are fully immune from prosecution over anything they did in office, even after they've left it — is one of the most profound questions of presidential power the court has ever had to answer. A lower court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's claims of immunity, ruling that he could be prosecuted for Jan. 6. Between the lines: The justices had options here. They could have declined to hear Trump's appeal. They wouldn't have had to tackle the question of presidential immunity, and Trump's trial would have proceeded before the election. That's what some legal experts were anticipating, based on how long it took the justices to announce whether they'd hear the case. Once they agreed to hear the appeal and decide whether presidents are beyond the reach of the criminal-justice system, keeping the trial paused makes sense. If you're not sure whether someone can be prosecuted, it's logical not to prosecute them until you've figured that out. Source: https://www.axios.com/2024/02/29/trump-wins-delay-immunity-case-supreme-court

"This could be game over:" Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case A delay is what Trump wanted most — even if he loses at the end of it. axios.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Ballots. Rulings. Election intel: #BREAKING Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Donald Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado’s primary ballot last year, the US supreme court has ruled, clearing the way for Trump to appear on the ballot in all 50 states. The court’s unanimous decision overturns a 4-3 ruling from the Colorado supreme court that said the former president could not run because he had engaged in insurrection during the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. The Colorado decision was a novel interpretation of section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars insurrectionists from holding office. “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the court wrote in an unsigned opinion. Congress, the court said, had to enact the procedures for disqualification under Section 3. “State-by-state resolution of the question whether Section 3 bars a particular candidate for President from serving would be quite unlikely to yield a uniform answer consistent with the basic principle that the President … represent[s] all the voters in the Nation,” the court added. Maine and a judge in Illinois had also excluded Trump from the ballot – decisions that are now likely to be quickly reversed. All nine justices agreed with the central holding in the case: that the Colorado supreme court had wrongly barred Trump from appearing on the ballot. But agreement did not extend beyond that. "For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case," Justice Barrett wrote in her concurring opinion. "That is the message Americans should take home." Trump, praised Monday's ruling. "It was a very important decision," he said in Mar-a-Lago hours after it was announced, calling it "very well-crafted. And I think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together." He added, "I have great respect for the Supreme Court, and I want to just thank them for working so quickly and so diligently and so brilliantly." Moves and countermoves. The cabal thought it would be easier to simply just remove Trump from the ballot as a contingency if Trump so happens to win his court cases. The states that elected to remove Trump from the ballot are compromised. The patriots there need to expose all corruption from the local governments there. Colorado. Illinois. Maine. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/04/trump-scotus-colorado-ruling

Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Court’s decision clears way for ex-president to appear on primary ballot in all states theguardian.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Dossier. Judgements. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over the Steele dossier President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a six-figure legal bill to a company founded by a former British spy that he unsuccessfully sued for making what his lawyer called “shocking and scandalous" false claims that harmed his reputation. A London judge, who threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence last month saying it was “bound to fail," ordered Trump to pay legal fees of 300,000 pounds[$382,000], according to court documents released Thursday. The Octogon has the judges. They are sleepers. This is just setting the stage for Trump’s upcoming criminal trials. Be prepared. Source: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/trump-ordered-pay-legal-fees-after-failed-lawsuit-107891658

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos Page Unavailable abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Judges. Charges. COMMS. Election interference intel: This is a win. But the battle is far from over. #BREAKING Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others in the case involving an alleged attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. The brief order from Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee states that six of the counts in the 41-count indictment returned by a Fulton County grand jury in August must be quashed. Of those six counts, Trump was charged with three of them. Joining Trump in the challenge to the six counts were former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and lawyers Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Ray Stallings Smith, and Robert Cheeley All had pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against them. Steve Sadow, Trump's lawyer, said the court's decision to quash the counts is the correct one. "The ruling is a correct application of the law, as the prosecution failed to make specific allegations of any alleged wrongdoing on those counts," he said in a statement. "The entire prosecution of President Trump is political, constitutes election interference, and should be dismissed." Eastman's attorney, Buddy Parker, said in a statement that "the court stated clearly the state failed to provide what exactly in the U.S. and Georgia constitutions the defendants solicited the public figures to violate, a clear error. We await the state's position on its intention in moving forward on the remaining charges." Allyn Stockton, Giuliani's local lawyer, said the quashing of the six counts was expected, as "there simply was not enough detail to put the defendants on notice of what to defend against." McAfee's ruling The six counts relate to various alleged attempts to solicit state officials to violate their oaths of office, both to the Georgia Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. The judge wrote that the state failed to specify what those violations were, saying the allegations were "so generic as to compel this Court" to quash the six charges. "The court's concern is less that the state has failed to allege sufficient conduct of the defendants — in fact, it has alleged an abundance. However, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is, in the undersigned's opinion, fatal," McAfee wrote. He said that though the six counts as written contain "all the essential elements of the crimes," they "fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission, i.e. the underlying felony solicited." Additionally, they don't give the defendants enough information to prepare their defenses "intelligently," McAfee wrote, as they could have violated Georgia and U.S. Constitutions "and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways." Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-georgia-case-some-charges-dismissed-2020-election/#

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee dismissed some charges against former President Trump and his co-defendants related to pressuring public officials to overturn the 2020 election, citing a lack of specificity from prosecutors. Three of Trump's charges were dropped, including one tied to his call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump's legal team viewed this as a positive development, although a former federal prosecutor noted it was only a partial victory, as the case remains largely intact. A significant decision is expected soon regarding the potential disqualification of District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who recently disclosed a romantic relationship. If disqualified, a new attorney could take over the case, possibly affecting its progress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Decades in jail. Here's CBS's Nicole Killian. Speaker 1: Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee threw out charges that accused former president Trump and several of his codefendants of pressuring public officers to violate their oaths as part of an alleged effort to overturn the 2020 election. McAfee said district attorney Fani Willis and her prosecutors were not specific enough about the violations, writing, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is fatal. Just 3 of Trump's 13 gowns were tossed, including one for his January 2021 phone call to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger. Speaker 2: I just wanna find, 11,000 780 votes. Speaker 1: Trump's legal team applauded the ruling. Speaker 0: It was a step in the right direction. It goes to the sloppiness of, frankly, the the prosecutors down there. Speaker 1: Former federal prosecutor Tom Dupree said it was only a partial victory for Trump. Speaker 2: Judge's decision effectively has the result of narrowing the case against Trump and the other defendants. It doesn't eliminate it entirely, though. Speaker 0: It is a lie. Speaker 1: McAfee's ruling comes ahead of a highly anticipated decision this week about whether Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade should be disqualified from the election interference case. Last month, the pair admitted to having a romantic relationship for about a year after Wade was hired, but denied any wrongdoing. Speaker 2: The romantic relationship ended before the indictment was returned. Yes or no? Speaker 0: To a man, yes. Speaker 1: The sprawling racketeering case against the former president and his associates remains largely intact. But if Willis is disqualified, another attorney could be assigned to the case, which could significantly impact the proceedings. Nora? Speaker 0: And potentially delay them. Nicole Killian, thank you so much.
Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Georgia. Judge. Fani Willis. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Judge rules Fani Willis can stay on Georgia case, but only if prosecutor steps down in [17] page ruling If Fani pack steps down. They would have to pick an entire team. That would delay the case indefinitely. So will she fire her prosecutor bae?

Video Transcript AI Summary
A major ruling has been made in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 co-defendants. Judge Scott McAfee has allowed Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis to remain on the case, although he noted an appearance of impropriety regarding her relationship with a prosecution team member, Nathan Wade. Trump’s attorneys argued for her disqualification based on this appearance, but the judge found no actual conflict of interest. Willis can either let Wade go or step aside with her entire office, but the case can proceed without significant delays. This outcome is seen as a positive for Willis, allowing her to continue without the complications of bringing in a new team.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News special report. Good morning. I'm Whit Johnson in New York, and we're coming on the air right now because there has been a major ruling in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 other codefendants. Judge Scott McAfee has just ruled Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis can remain on the case. So let's get right to our senior investigative correspondent, Aaron Koutierski. Because, Aaron, the way the judge laid this out here, there are multiple options to work with. Speaker 1: There are with because he did not totally clear the district attorney here in Fulton County from the whiff of but he said Donald Trump and some of his codefendants failed to show that there was an actual conflict of interest posed by her relationship with another member of the prosecution team, Nathan Wade, whom she hired to help run the case. But he did say there was an appearance of impropriety. And so while disqualification was not necessary, the judge did give options. The decision says the district attorney may choose to step aside along with the entirety of her office or she can let Nathan Wade go and the case can continue. So with the ball is now in Fani Willis' court to decide how to proceed. Speaker 0: Alright, Aaron. Stand by. Let's bring in Olivia Rubin, our investigative reporter. And, Olivia, I know you've been following this closely. Of course, the appearance of impropriety, this is exactly what Trump's attorneys and the attorneys of the other codefendants were trying to lay out. Speaker 2: It's exactly what Donald Trump's attorney, Steve Sadow, and many of the other defense attorneys told the judge should be enough to remove her from the case. They said that there is enough in Georgia law that should mean that an appearance of a conflict should get her kicked off, but that is exactly what the DA argued against, telling the judge immediately after we saw all of those, you know, high stakes evidentiary hearings saying that there is no case law that just an appearance of conflict should lead to a disqualification and urged the judge really, really in this I I think it was a 17 page filing saying there must be an actual conflict of interest. And as we just heard from Erin, the judge ultimately found that there was no actual conflict of interest, that the trips that they took together, that the money that was paid by Nathan Wheat's card, remember Fani Willis said she paid that back in cash, that she had no financial benefit, and that should dispel any idea that she had a financial stake in keeping the case going. So when the judge heard that, it seems that that seemed to dispel any notion that she had any sort of personal stake here. And I think it's likely that we're gonna hear from the DA that this is a win for her case. I think it's not, you know, the worst outcome that Nathan Wade, which is likely the option that they're going to choose, is going to have to step aside because the case will continue forward. Fonnie Willis can continue forward, and it does not have to get tied up now by this outside body having to pick an entirely new team to come in and pick up the case, probably delaying it indefinitely. So that has been avoided today if they take the option of Nathan Wade Wit.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Attorney. Michigan. Arrests. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in DC. Stefanie Lambert was arrested by the U.S. Marshals after a hearing over possible sanctions against her for disseminating confidential emails from Dominion Voting Systems, the target of conspiracy theories over former President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss. Lambert obtained the Dominion emails by representing Patrick Byrne, a prominent funder of election conspiracy theorists who are being sued by Dominion for defamation. Earlier Monday, Lambert had acknowledged passing on the records from Dominion Voting Systems to “law enforcement.” She then attached an affidavit that included some of the leaked emails and was signed by Dar Leaf, a county sheriff in northern Michigan who has investigated false claims of widespread election fraud from the 2020 election, to a filing in her own case in Michigan. The rest of the documents were posted to an account under Leaf’s name on X. Lambert contended that the Dominion documents obtained under discovery were evidence of “crimes” and needed to be disclosed. Dominion is trying their best to hide exculpatory evidence. If Dominion is not stopped. They will steal the election again. This means they will start another pandemic. To get massive mail-in ballots again. Patterns. Source: https://apnews.com/article/voting-machines-dominion-defamation-68d3f3a4e840ccb7a81d72837c4f6b3e?taid=65f8e50fa8059200016d3705&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in Washington, D.C. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. New York. Election interference intel: #BREAKING New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Trump's lawyers had asked to adjourn the New York trial indefinitely until Trump's immunity claim in his Washington, DC, election interference case was resolved Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan deemed Trump’s request untimely, ruling that his lawyers had plenty of opportunities to raise the immunity issue before they did earlier this month. "This Court finds that Defendant had myriad opportunities to raise the claim of presidential immunity well before March 7, 2024," Merchan wrote, adding that Trump and his lawyers could have made the argument on September 29, 2023, which he says was just six days before he made the same presidential immunity argument in Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Jan. 6 and election interference. Trump's trial begins on April 15th, 2024. The cabal will try and damage, sentence, and pass judgments by any means necessary up until the election Developing... Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-hush-money-trial-rejects-trumps-request-delay-scotus-rules-immunity

New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan has rejected the former president’s bid for a delay in the hush money trial until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on his immunity claims in another case. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Markers. COMMS. Trump. Trial. Judge. Courts. Denial. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Judge again declines Trump's latest appeal to delay NY hush money case A New York appeals court on Wednesday declined another bid by former President Trump to delay his hush money trial for the third time this week. The former president’s lawyers took aim at three rulings by Judge Juan Merchan: Refusing to recuse, not delaying the trial until the Supreme Court rules on Trump’s presidential immunity claim and requiring Trump to seek permission before filing new motions before trial. Trump is using a maneuver under New York state law, known as an Article 78 proceeding, that involves suing the judge over their decisions. The filings were placed under seal and are not publicly available. The Hill has requested comment from Trump’s lawyers. It marked the latest of a series of eleventh-hour efforts by Trump’s lawyers to stop jury selection from beginning Monday, which would mark the first criminal trial of a former president. The three appeals will now go to a full five-judge panel for consideration. The Octogon controls the judges, jury, and prosecutors. We'll see if the Supreme Court rules by Friday or Monday. Which is highly unlikely. If not, the trial will proceed. And then the only way the Supreme Court can rule is on appeal if found guilty. This would mean all appellate courts would have to deny the appeal first before ultimately bringing it before the Supreme Court. Most of the time, that process could take years. This is a sinister plot by the cabal. Developing... Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4586672-trumps-latest-hush-money-trial-delay-effort-denied-by-appeals-court/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Judge. Prosecution. Jury. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Begins With Jury Selection Here’s what else to know about Mr. Trump’s trial: This is the Manhattan criminal case against Mr. Trump, and it was brought by the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, a year ago. Mr. Trump is facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and, if convicted, could face up to four years in prison. The case, one of four indictments facing the former president and presumptive Republican nominee, may be the only one to make it to trial before Election Day. Jury selection will be crucial for both sides. Prosecutors have some advantage, as the jury pool is drawn from Manhattan, one of the most Democratic counties in America. Mr. Trump’s team will be looking for red needles in a blue haystack. Mr. Trump has twice sought Justice Merchan’s recusal, citing his daughter’s work as a Democratic political consultant. Justice Merchan has declined to step aside, noting a ruling by a judicial ethics commission that found his daughter’s work posed no conflict for him. “There is no agenda here,” Justice Merchan said in court on Monday, adding, “we want to follow the law, we want justice to be done.” Mr. Trump has also attacked the judge’s daughter on social media. Hundreds of potential jurors have been summoned. Those who say they cannot be fair or otherwise serve are being excused, and the remaining prospective jurors will answer 42 questions compiled before the trial. Lawyers on both sides will be able to remove a limited number of them without explanation. The lawyers can also ask to remove a potential juror “for cause” by providing specific reasons they believe that person cannot be fair. In addition to the payment to Ms. Daniels, Mr. Bragg’s office is expected to highlight two other deals involving The National Enquirer, a tabloid that has longstanding ties to Mr. Trump. In one deal, the tabloid bought the silence of a man who had heard that Mr. Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock, a rumor that turned out to be false, and in the other, it paid Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, who wanted to sell her story of an affair with Mr. Trump. The prosecution’s witness list is expected to include David Pecker, the former publisher of The National Enquirer, as well as Hope Hicks, a former aide to Mr. Trump. Ms. Daniels and Ms. McDougal could also testify.■ The judge contends that if Trump misses any day of the trial, he will be arrested and sent to jail. Developing... Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/15/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial

No Jurors Picked on First Day of Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Donald J. Trump faces charges he falsified business records to cover up a sex scandal while serving as president. More than half of the first group of prospective jurors was dismissed almost immediately. nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Comms. Trump. Judge. New York. Prison. Trial intel: #BREAKING New York judge says Trump can't attend Supreme Court arguments on presidential immunity The New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s hush money trial said Monday that Trump can not attend arguments on presidential immunity at the Supreme Court next week. It came after the judge earlier delayed a decision on allowing Trump to attend his son Barron’s high school graduation in May. The decision to not allow Trump to be in Washington, D.C., on April 25, when the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a presidential immunity claim Trump is making in his federal criminal case, came just before the New York trial adjourned Monday. “Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal, and I can certainly appreciate why your client would want to be there, but a trial in New York Supreme Court … is also a big deal,” Judge Juan Merchan said to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, rejecting his request to let the former president play hooky.■ These are further comms suggesting that the judge, jurors, and prosecution are in cohoots with the Octogon. I definitely don't trust this magi judge. Protected. Well insulated. Are prison comms. Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4595849-ny-judge-trump-supreme-court-presidential-immunity/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump & Barron: #BREAKING A Heartbroken Trump just wrote: "Who will explain for me, to my wonderful son, Barron, who is a GREAT Student at a fantastic School, that his Dad will likely not be allowed to attend his Graduation Ceremony, something that we have been talking about for years, because a seriously Conflicted and Corrupt New York State Judge wants me in Criminal Court on a bogus “Biden Case” which, according to virtually all Legal Scholars and Pundits, has no merit, and should NEVER have been brought. "This Fake Case is solely meant to attack Crooked Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME, who is seriously leading him in the Polls, for purposes of Election Interference. The Judge, Juan Merchan, is preventing me from proudly attending my son’s Graduation. Seems very unfair, doesn’t it? But this whole event is unfair. Every one of the many Fake Cases that are perpetuated by the White House in order to help the Worst President in History, by far, get Re-Elected, are UNJUST SCAMS. We won’t let that happen, but we will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" The cabal is doing Trump dirty. Karma. The cabal will get theirs in the end. Justice can't come quick enough.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jurors. New York. Election Interference intel: #BREAKING Lawyers has completed their selection of12 jurors to serve in Trump hush-money case Lawyers in Donald Trump's historic criminal trial on Thursday selected 12 jurors who will assess his guilt or innocence over the coming weeks in a case stemming from a hush-money payment to a porn star. Lawyers for the defense and the prosecution still in their selection phase. Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-hush-money-jury-selection-resumes-lawyers-probe-bias-2024-04-18/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. NY AG. Letitia James. Octogon intel: #BREAKING New York AG Letitia James asks the judge to void Trump's bond over his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. In a 26-page filing ahead of a pre-scheduled hearing on Monday, James expressed concern about whether Knight Specialty Insurance Company could secure the $175 million bond. She also argued that the collateral put up by the former president should be under the full control of the company. One of James' concerns about KSIC is that the insurer "is not authorized to write business in New York and thus not regulated by the state’s insurance department." She added that the company "had never before written a surety bond in New York or in the prior two years in any other jurisdiction and has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million." Developing... Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/york-ag-letitia-james-asks-233142759.html

New York AG Letitia James asks judge to void Trump's bond in his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. yahoo.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The court has upheld the $175 million bond tied to Trump. Friday, I reported that James was challenging the court to not accept Trumps $175 million payment. The court rejected James' motion. Who doesn't want $175 million?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: A court has ruled that Trump's $175 million bond will remain in place, despite challenges from New York Attorney General Letitia James. Former federal prosecutor Tchaikovsky indicated that this ruling is likely to hold up. James argued that the insurance company backing the bond might lack sufficient resources for an appeal, but the court disagreed. The bond must be held in cash, not in fluctuating assets like mutual funds or securities. Knight Insurance will manage the account and provide monthly financial statements to the attorney general, confirming the $175 million is secured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. So here's the breaking news. And the former federal prosecutor, Tchaikovsky, and I were just talking about this, and he said this was not gonna hold up. He said Trump's gonna be fine. So the court has just ruled that the bond, that $175,000,000 bond that Trump put up will stand despite the fight that the woman on the right, Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, was trying to slide in. And and what did Cherkowsky call it? He called it she was trying to play a legal technicality, saying that the insurance company that Trump was using wasn't going to have the resources to back up that bond should he fail an appeal. Well, the court says the bond can stay. 175,000,000 needs to be in cash, not mutual funds or securities where value can fluctuate. Knight Insurance cannot trade or move the money, but they will have control of the account and will provide a monthly financial statement to the attorney general showing $175,000,000 in

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Memo. Judge. Orders. Patriot intel: #REPORT Trump just released this memo hours ago. It's a comm. This will set the precedent on how this trial will go and his remaining 4 trials.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Immunity. Precedents. Trump. Supreme Court. Future comms intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court case set to argue about immunity for President Trump The Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted over his efforts to undo his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden. The case, to be argued Thursday, stems from Trump’s attempts to have charges against him dismissed. Lower courts have found he cannot claim immunity for actions that, prosecutors say, illegally sought to interfere with the election results. The Republican ex-president has been charged in federal court in Washington with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, one of four criminal cases he is facing. A trial has begun in New York over hush money payments to a porn star to cover up an alleged sexual encounter. The Supreme Court is moving faster than usual in taking up the case, though not as quickly as special counsel Jack Smith wanted, raising questions about whether there will be time to hold a trial before the November election, if the justices agree with lower courts that Trump can be prosecuted. The patterns suggest that Trump will not get immunity from prosecution. What does this mean and why does it matters? This will set future direction to go after all of the other living presidents. But unfortunately, it'll have to start with Trump. The letter of the law has to be followed, especially because of this corrupt 2 tired justice system. Every T crossed. Every I dotted. Every R and N cannot be run together. Think rn = m. Think corney/comey. If everything is not done right. This nation is over. You will have new foreign occupants in the Whitehouse. You think no one is fighting back now? No one will definitely fight back then. Our nation stands on the precipice. Source: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-immunity-prosecution-capitol-riot-9fd5dc5947dab82bbd18d3efcb4267d8

What to know in the Supreme Court case about immunity for former President Trump The core issue being debated before the Supreme Court on Thursday boils down to whether a former president is immune from prosecution for actions taken while in office. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Secrets service. Trump. Trial. Arrest comms: #BREAKING Secret Service prepares if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case The U.S. Secret Service held meetings and started planning for what to do if former President Donald Trump were to be held in contempt in his criminal hush money trial and Judge Juan Merchan opted to send him to short-term confinement, officials familiar with the situation told ABC News. Merchan on Tuesday reserved a decision on the matter after a contentious hearing. Prosecutors said at this point they are seeking a fine. “We are not yet seeking an incarceratory penalty," assistant district attorney Chris Conroy said, "But the defendant seems to be angling for that." Officials do not necessarily believe Merchan would put Trump in a holding cell in the courthouse, but they are planning for contingencies, the officials said. There have not been discussions yet about what to do if Trump is convicted and sentenced to prison. Developing... Source: https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-services-prepares-potential-trump-contempt-order-hush/story?id=109542824

Secret Service prepares for if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case Judge Merchan on Tuesday reserved decision after a contentious hearing. abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Immunity. Clarence Thomas. Trial intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised the question to Trump’s lawyers if they have challenged special counsel Jack Smith's authority to bring charges against the former president, which could provide a loophole that may disqualify Smith. Mr. Sauer said that Trump attorneys have not raised such concerns "directly" in the current case at the Supreme Court however, Trump’s attorney John Sauer agrees with the "analysis provided by AG Edwin Meese and AG Michael B. Mukasey," referring to the amicus brief the two former attorneys general submitted to the Supreme Court on March 19. In the brief, the two attorneys general argue that Mr. Smith "does not have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution." Developing... Source: leadingreport

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jury. Deliberations. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury Now Deliberating In Trump’s Hush Money Trial—And Trump Can’t Leave Until There’s A Verdict Jurors began deliberating Wednesday over whether former President Donald Trump should be criminally convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, bringing nearly six weeks of testimony and arguments in the historic trial to an end—though it’s unclear how long it will take them to reach a verdict. Jurors started deliberating at approximately 11:30 a.m. Eastern time Wednesday after Judge Juan Merchan delivered the jury instructions, following closing arguments on Tuesday that stretched into the evening hours. Parties in the case—including Trump—can’t leave the courthouse during the jury’s deliberations until there’s a verdict, Merchan told the parties. All parties, including the Jurors, can not leave until a verdict is made. Developing... Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/05/29/jury-now-deliberating-in-trumps-hush-money-trial/?sh=2ab9e5bf23c0

Jury Won’t Reach Verdict In Trump Trial Today As Court Ends For The Day It’s unclear how long it could take the jury to reach a verdict. forbes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Judge. Jury. Octogon intel: The cabal are desperately trying by any means necessary to find Trump guilty of any offense so they can sentence him to prison. #BREAKING The judge in Trump's case tells jurors they could be split ‘4-4-4,’ and he will still treat them as unanimous verdicts This is insane!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge has indicated that jurors do not need to agree on the specific crime involved in the case, which is unprecedented. In typical criminal cases, jurors must unanimously agree on the elements of the offense, such as intent and the nature of the crime. Here, the key element that elevates the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony is the concealment of another crime. The judge's ruling allows for disagreement among jurors about what that other crime is, which undermines the basis for the felony charge. This is significant because the case could not have been pursued as a misdemeanor due to the statute of limitations expiring in 2019, making the felony charge crucial for the prosecution's ability to proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First could do. He just delivered, what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. He said that there is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 444 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's really outrageous because in a normal criminal case, every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case, it's, you know, you have to rob. It's gotta be a financial institution. You have to show intent. Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that were that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony because, remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime. And here, the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, what makes it a 4 year potential prison penalty rather than, a year or less, but it's also what gets us into the courtroom. Because if if this had been a misdemeanor, the the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. So the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly, and yet now the judge is saying Speaker 0: That these jurors could do.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jurors just rang the courtroom! Either they have a question or verdict. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Jury asks the judge a question via note: They asked for a witness testimony transcript from former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury just asked to rehear the judge’s instructions. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The kury in the Trump trial was dismissed for the day. The court resumes tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. ET. Apparently, the jury can only leave if the judge dismisses them. I will post all updates as they come in on this thread. Be sure to bookmark all pills and all threads.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE These are the jury instructions from the judge: 👇

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING Media. Trump and team head back into the courtroom. Could be another jury question. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Chaos continues to ensue outside of the courthouse. Apparently, according to the reporters emails. The people returning back to the courtroom were from a lunch break. Credit: NYP

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Soc media. Judge. Corruption. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Trump just posted minutes ago on his app Truth Social and went in on judge Merchan Will the jury reach a verdict at 6pm? 6 o'clock can be dangerous.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury doesn't want to stay until 6pm today. The judge left it up to them. Jury is said to leave 430pm est. No verdict is expected today. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

I strongly believe the jurors have already made their decision. And going home early to marinate on it. They'll return tmr with a Not Guilty verdict.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING VERDICT REACHED IN TRUMP TRIAL!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING TRUMP FOUND GUILTY ON ALL 34 COUNTS!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Verdict. Sentencing. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trimp sentencing is set for July 11th, 2024. The probation interview is being set, too. Judge just told the jury there free to discuss the trial with anyone. The verdict shouldn't surprise anyone. These are Octogon courts. Their minds were already set. The Octogon controls the judges, courts, jurors, prosecutors, district attorneys. The cabal needs Trump out of the way by any means necessary. Cabal is not going down without a fight. Trumps other trials will be similar. This entire fiasco has to play itself out between now and election day. That's if there is an election. I've been telling you they're poised to take it again. Bidan won't make it. Harris becomes president and names Gavin Newsom her VP. Pandemic part 2 is already slated. The summer war has already been set. This is all corruption to high firmament. Where do we go from here? Prep. That's all I'm going to say publicly.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump COMMS: #BREAKING Trump donation page crashed shortly after the verdict was read The sentencing date is 4 days before the GOP Convention on July 18th, where they officially nominate Trump for president.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Rulings. MI Intel: #BREAKING Trump wins Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. Will delay Trumps cases until November and beyond. Major blow to the prosecution[s] Supreme Court Ruling: Trump v. United States (23-939) The nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority; he is also entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts; there is no immunity for unofficial acts.■ I've told everyone since the beginning. The SC ruling is very important and that it would go in Trump's favor. Why? Because military tribunals are needed. If Trumps presidential immunity wasn't granted. This would mean the cabal presidency of Bidan. Obama. Bush. Clinton. Would also be brought up on indictments and charges. That can't happen. Why? We have a double jeopardy law. This means someone can't be charged with the same crime twice. The Octogon Group controls the courts, judges, jurors, lawyers, prosecutors, and politicians. So yes, it would've been nice to have them all publicly charged, indicted, and arrested. But all of them would've been cleared of everything. These deepstate cabal[Octogon] members have to be tried in military tribunals. That's the only way to legally and lawfully end this deepstate cabal in America. This ruling should come as no surprise to those who have been following the patterns. Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/

Home - Supreme Court of the United States supremecourt.gov

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. COMMS. Sentencing. Judges. Patriot intel: #REPORT Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. The sentencing hearing, previously scheduled for July 11, will now take place Sept. 18 at the earliest, according to a letter posted on the court's docket. The delay guarantees that Trump won't be sentenced until after he is formally nominated for president at the Republican National Convention, which begins July 15, and that sentencing will happen less than two months before the presidential election. This is perfect timing, actually. It gives us a chance to prep and finish up your preps before all hell breaks loose. At the same time, it's giving the cabal the opportunity to get their black operations together. As they prepare for Trump to retake the throne. Be ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-trumps-hush-money-trial-delays-sentencing-supreme-court-immunity-rcna160028

Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

🚨GOOD NEWS ALERT!🚨 Courts. Judges. Trump. Classified. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Judge dismisses Trump "classified documents" case A Trump-appointed judge in Florida has dismissed the criminal case against Donald Trump that charged him with illegally holding on to classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The US district judge Aileen Cannon made the ruling after a hearing in which the former president’s legal team urged her to drop the charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith, and notably, after the supreme court said the president has immunity for official acts. Trump’s team had argued that he is the victim of selective prosecution and is being targeted by Democrats as he seeks to regain the presidency. A huge win against the cabal! Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/15/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-speech-milwaukee-shooting-joe-biden-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Trump joins crowd at Republican convention hall with bandaged ear, in first public appearance since assassination attempt – as it happened Ex-president emerges to cheers and chants of ‘USA! USA! USA!’ as he appears amid supporters theguardian.com
willscharf
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 6:11 PM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 6:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump has filed a motion to dismiss the DC case against him, citing presidential immunity. He argues that presidents are immune from criminal prosecutions for acts within their official responsibilities, unless impeached and convicted. This argument is supported by legal principles, caselaw, and the Constitution. The motion asserts that the alleged acts fall within the outer perimeter of Trump's official responsibilities. If the motion is denied, it can be appealed. The entire indictment should be dismissed based on presidential immunity.

@willscharf - Will Scharf

BREAKING: President Trump files motion to dismiss D.C. case A short while ago in federal court in Washington, D.C., President Trump filed a motion to dismiss the case pending against him there for his alleged actions in the aftermath of the 2020 elections. The motion cites presidential immunity as a ground to dismiss the case in its entirety. This is a very big deal. The motion persuasively argues that the D.C. case should be dismissed, and if past practice is any guide all proceedings could and should be stayed while this issue is litigated fully. Notably, this same reasoning should apply to the ongoing Georgia prosecution as well. A number of legal commentators have anticipated this move, and in this thread I’m going to get into the weeds and review the core argument made—that presidential immunity is an absolute bar to the prosecution of President Trump for his alleged acts in office that underlie the federal prosecution in D.C. 1/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(A) Presidential Immunity At its heart, President Trump is arguing that presidents, even after their terms in office are over, are absolutely immune from criminal prosecutions arising out of their acts in office that fall within the “outer perimeter” of their official responsibilities as president, unless they have first been both impeached and convicted by the House of Representatives and Senate. And he’s arguing that all of the acts he is alleged to have committed fall within this absolute immunity. This view, as the motion filed today makes clear, is deeply rooted in bedrock legal principles, in caselaw, in the Constitution, and in actual practice dating back centuries. In Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court ruled that a president has absolute immunity from civil liability for acts within the outer perimeter of their official responsibilities. In short, you cannot sue a former president personally because his official acts harmed you. This is unquestioned Supreme Court precedent, based on very serious, core separation of powers concerns. If a president were susceptible to civil suit for his official acts, the Court held that this would “raise unique risks to the functioning of government” in light of the “singular importance of the President’s duties.” The purpose of presidential immunity, the Fitzgerald Court’s view, is to prevent concerns about being sued clouding the president’s judgment and crippling his ability to act—presidents need to be able to discharge their duties to the best of their abilities without having to worry about being haled into court when their terms expire. This well-established immunity doctrine has never been tested in the criminal context, for the simple reason that no president has been subjected to the sort of relentless prosecutions that President Trump has now been faced with, but the motion persuasively argues that the reasoning in Fitzgerald should still apply. 2/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(B) Impeachment Clause This view is also rooted in the actual text of the Constitution. The Impeachment Clause of Article I provides that, although impeachment proceedings do not themselves carry a punishment beyond removal from office, a party convicted after impeachment "shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.” By specifying that a president impeached and convicted could be subject to indictment, etc., the Constitution plainly and clearly implies that absent impeachment and conviction a president cannot be criminally prosecuted for his official acts. Democrats impeached President Trump twice, and on both occasions the Senate acquitted him. Absent a conviction at an impeachment trial, presidential immunity applies to all of President Trump’s acts that fall within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities, and for these acts at least he cannot be prosecuted. 3/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(C) Scope of Immunity Are the acts that underlie President Trump’s indictment in D.C. within this “outer perimeter” of his official responsibilities as president? I think the answer is clearly yes. First, it is very important to note that in the context of assessing immunity, the motive of a president is irrelevant. Why the president did something is immaterial; the question is what the president did and whether that was within this very broad outer perimeter of his official responsibilities. And because the scope of presidential authority and of presidential responsibilities is so vast, the catchment of presidential immunity is similarly expansive. When you actually review the alleged acts that underlie the D.C. indictment, my view is that each and every one clearly falls within the other perimeter of President Trump’s official responsibilities. We are talking about things like •Making public statements about the administration of the 2020 federal election; •Communications with public officials, both in the states and in the federal government, about the administration of the 2020 federal election; and •Taking steps, like assembling alternate slates of electors, to allow Congress and/or the Vice President to take action on the federal election fraud that he believed had occurred. Remember, for the purposes of assessing the scope of immunity, intent and veracity/falsity are irrelevant. Your views on whether President Trump’s views on the election were accurate are irrelevant. Your views on why President Trump did what he did are irrelevant. If the acts themselves were presidential acts, falling within the outer perimeter of presidential responsibilities, they cannot form the basis for a criminal prosecution of President Trump, because presidential immunity applies. As a result, since the entire indictment in the D.C. case against President Trump is predicated on acts that he is immune from prosecution for, the case should be dismissed. 4/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

(D) Appealability One final note on timing: any denial of this motion to dismiss, or any similar motion in Georgia, is likely immediately appealable, as is the case in where Congressional legislative immunity is implicated. Which means, depending on how long it takes Judge Chutkan to rule, this issue could be before the D.C. Circuit and potentially the Supreme Court before long. 5/6

@willscharf - Will Scharf

Lastly, if you like this kind of analysis and want to see more of it, RT this thread and follow me here. And if you’d like to find out more about me, check me out on social media or at http://www.votescharf.com. 6/6

Vote Will Scharf votescharf.com
TomFitton
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 8:47 PM
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 5:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump's legal team argues that the US Constitution prohibits the Biden administration's prosecution of Trump for questioning the election. They claim absolute immunity for the President's actions within his official responsibilities. The prosecution alleges impure motives, but the President's motivations are not for the court to decide. The indictment should be dismissed.

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

Breaking: I've carefully reviewed the latest brief filed by Trump's legal team which alleges that the US Constitution prohibits the Biden regime's unprecedented attack on our constitutional system through a crazed prosecution of Trump for daring to question Biden's election victory. Trump's legal team makes a powerful and persuasive constitutional case to DISMISS Biden regime's effort to jail him for simply doing his job as president to try to ensure the laws concerning elections were faithfully enforced and followed. The brief's introduction: The President of the United States sits at the heart of our system of government. He is our Nation’s leader, our head of state, and our head of government. As such, the founders tasked the President—and the President alone—with the sacred obligation of “tak[ing] Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” U.S. CONST. art. II, § 3. To ensure the President may serve unhesitatingly, without fear that his political opponents may one day prosecute him for decisions they dislike, the law provides absolute immunity “for acts within the ‘outer perimeter’ of [the President’s] official responsibility.” Nixon v. Fitzgerald 457 U.S. 731, 756 (1982) (quoting Barr v. Matteo, 360 U.S. 564, 575 (1959) (plurality opinion)). Breaking 234 years of precedent, the incumbent administration has charged President Trump for acts that lie not just within the “outer perimeter,” but at the heart of his official responsibilities as President. In doing so, the prosecution does not, and cannot, argue that President Trump’s efforts to ensure election integrity, and to advocate for the same, were outside the scope of his duties. Instead, the prosecution falsely claimsthat President Trump’s motives were impure— that he purportedly “knew” that the widespread reports of fraud and election irregularities were untrue but sought to address them anyway. But as the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and hundreds of years of history and tradition all make clear, the President’s motivations are not for the prosecution or this Court to decide. Rather, where, as here, the President’s actions are within the ambit of his office, he is absolutely immune from prosecution. Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U.S. 483, 494, 949 (1896) (“The ‘allegation of malicious or corrupt motives’ does not affect a public official’s immunity and “[t]he motive that impelled [the official] to do that of which the plaintiff Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC Document 74 Filed 10/05/23 Page 7 of 52 2 complains is … wholly immaterial.”). Therefore, the Court should dismiss the indictment, with prejudice. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 801 (1989) (“Dismissal of the indictment is the proper sanction when a defendant has been granted immunity from prosecution…”) (citation omitted).

Cernovich
Posted - October 29, 2023 at 12:17 AM
Saved - October 30, 2023 at 4:04 PM

@Cernovich - Cernovich

Trump is the most innocent man in human history. All these lies and investigations and the best case they have is he took boxes that belonged to him. Not even his never trump haters consider the other prosecutions as having any basis. The rule of law is being cut down!

LeadingReport
Posted - November 10, 2023 at 11:16 PM
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 10:08 PM

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: Italian and US intelligence testimony that the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen from President Donald Trump. https://t.co/Or89RHsKMW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Maria Zak from Nations in Action discusses alleged election interference in the United States. She claims that the Italian Secret Service received information from Arturo's girlfriend, who said that Arturo confessed to not understanding why they were stealing America's election. The Italian intelligence services reached out to Nations in Action, expressing concern about a coup d'etat in the US. Maria plays an audio recording from Larry Johnson, a member of the CIA and State Department, discussing efforts to rescue Arturo and bring him to the US for testimony. She calls for an investigation into these claims and highlights patterns of illegal activity in the election, including mismatched signatures and illegal cross-county voting. Maria also implicates individuals in Italy, including Stefano Serafini, General Claudio Graziano, and Ignacio Moncada, in coordinating the alleged interference.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll go ahead and move on to our presentation from, Maria Zak, and this is, talking about the elections. Go ahead. Speaker 1: Good morning. I'm Maria Zak from Nations in Action, and We are an organization that's devoted to transparent government, transformative politicians, trustworthy parties And Truthful Media. The Italian Secret Service actually received information And from Arturo's girlfriend, he considers wife because they've been together so long. Her uncle is part of the Italian intelligence services. She said, uncle, Artura came home and said he doesn't understand why we're stealing America's election. They immediately go to Leonardo and investigate. Arturo confesses. The Italian intelligence services reach out to us November 18th. They said something happened. We're watching a coup d'etat in the United States of America. They were fearful of meeting with anyone. There were 2 affidavits that were delivered into Congress. And they were delivered from Italian citizens that contacted us. Intelligence agencies Had been trying to reach out because their country had already fallen. And that is what is happening around the world. The intelligence agencies are watching corruption And China come in to theirs their countries and buying off politicians and hiding things and using Fraud to do amazing efforts to take over and own property and in some instances, countries. So today I'm going to play for you an audio tape that should shock you all. It'll shock America. This is the 1st place I have chosen to testify in. I could have walked into any state. I know my way around. We've already proven my credentials. I know government affairs. I can walk in, and when I play this for you and why Kansas? Because Kansas was a pro Trump, victor of electors. But I would argue you don't know. You do not know the real result of your election. You also probably have not been made aware of what was occurring in Italy. Leonardo, the defense contracting firm, had Some strange occurrences happening with people coming in and out that the intelligence services witnessed of people coming from Frankfurt Into the Italian U. S. Embassy in Rome on Via Veneto. This instance enabled Individuals to come forward and supposedly, according to the Italian intelligence services, work with Leonardo to change the results Of the United States election. But more frightening is that they claimed there were 47 to 52 presidential elections around the world, And they now have telemetry experts over 200 that speak foreign languages that are all different. So what you are dealing with is a very calculated attempt To take down presidencies and control countries. So this audio that I'm about to play For you is from an individual who is a member of the CIA and the State Department. His name is Larry Johnson. Many of you may not know, but I am the person not only who hand delivered that letter to Donald Trump on Christmas Eve on in 2020, telling him Who stole the election, where they stole it, and how they stole it. And my number one goal was to bring back one of the people who was In the satellite center, his name was Arturo D'Alega. My goal was to rescue him and bring him over to America because he was willing to testify. There were people that would not assist, that I thought would assist, but what was most shocking was this voice recording that I will play now. Speaker 2: Maria, hi. Larry Johnson. We spoke yesterday. Listen. I needed to see if you would help us get in touch with the lawyer because if you talked to him yesterday, he went, Missing. We have people in Italy now and are ready to have the person, that's in jail. We've got a national security team that can extradite him and bring him back safely to the United States. So that's already lined up. There's no need for an airplane because the Maria Zak? Speaker 1: That's our United States government supposedly, national security, that are going to go rescue Arturo Delia. Anyone know about that? Probably not. Anyone? Because most Americans had this truth hidden from them, that there was an operation supposedly, But the number one thing that they were looking for in the beginning of that message was where the lawyers were and the people who did the affidavits who were being hunted to be killed. These are brave people around the world that are trying to tell the truth and having great difficulty with the United States government apparatus. Telling the truth is not easy, and people are risking their lives. So that was the transcript. So you ask, okay, What proof is there? Well, I would definitely consider that, sir, Mr. Chairman and members. That is called proof. That needs an investigation. Where is our law enforcement? It should be at the local, state, and federal levels immediately to investigate Larry Johnson and the activities that he did In the United States during this whole event? You know, everyone says if you see something, say something, right? We're all supposed to see something, say something, and then what happens? You get blasted. We had patterns of illegal activity across the country. We had People not matching signatures on the ballots. We had witnesses galore filling out affidavits. I'm so proud of the team at Nations in Action because they filed many, many, many affidavits. They saw the computers actually online and there are photographs. So if anyone says the machines weren't online, that is false. So these witnesses that have come forward have also identified over 35,000 illegal cross county voting just in Georgia alone, and that relates To president Trump's talk with secretary of state Brad Raffensperger where he was saying, I know that there are votes there that were illegally cast. He was right. He is actually vindicated in the proof today because the cross reference with the state documents and the US Postal Service Feed shows that these people did not live where they actually voted. Those votes should have never been counted. Now we have illegal votes that are cast using fake residences and business addresses, photocopied identical ballots and stacks fed into tabulators, And many fake unfolded, unmailed absentee ballots. Of the thousands of affidavits just filed in Georgia alone, would you like to know how many arrests were made? 0. 0. All those great citizens who we ask to do us a favor and help us do our right To vote, to go and volunteer to work polls had no no assistance at all in having a free and fair election, and they witnessed the failures of America. So now you should be asking me, who are the people in Italy, Maria? Who are they that actually coordinated and conspired? Because this is where we really break things down and show you the proof of what occurred. Stefano Serafini on your left Is actually a member of our state department who retired just days before the election. It is said that he in an intercept, it was picked up that he was Retiring so he wouldn't lose his pension should he be caught. He was coordinating with general Claudio Graziano. General Graziano is also the at the time, was the EU commander. And they were meeting across the street at the St. Regis Hotel, And it was with Ignacio Moncada, who is the CEO of FATA, which is FATA SPA, which is a subsidiary have Leonardo, one of the largest defense contracting firms in the world. They are the largest in Italy, And they received numerous United States military and intelligence contracts. That should frighten everybody right now. No. They were meeting in his hotel, and in March of 2020, they were coordinating this plan. The Italian intelligence services actually provided me with the cell phone number for the go order, and it goes to general Graziano. So then you ask, well, they concoct the plan. They have to go get the IT guys. Who's gonna do it? Well, they already had a guy. His name is Charles Robinson. He is a telemetry expert. He came in a week prior To the election of November 2020. He uploaded Mil Spec software, and he had traveled from Frankfurt.
TrumpDailyPosts
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 5:28 PM
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 3:53 AM

@TrumpDailyPosts - Donald J. Trump Posts From His Truth Social

“The Trump Warrant Had No Legal Basis” Donald Trump Truth Social Post 12:14 PM EST 11/15/23 https://t.co/ZanAwCNqid

BehizyTweets
Posted - November 28, 2023 at 4:57 AM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump seeks classified documents to prove foreign interference in 2020 election. He demands access to info on foreign influence efforts, including those related to January 6 events. Trump claims entitlement to all relevant details.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: Donald Trump has filed a motion to compel discovery of classified documents that would prove that there was foreign interference in the 2020 election "President Trump is also entitled to all information relating to foreign influence efforts targeting the 2020 election, including foreign influence relating to events on January 6, whether or not he was briefed contemporaneously regarding these issues."

ChuckCallesto
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 8:23 PM

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

DONALD J. TRUMP: “The Attorney General committed fraud, you just saw it right in there, SHE’S A FRAUD, This whole case is a fraud. It’s election interference.” https://t.co/ZAKSzMYRqe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their opinion that the attorney general is a fraud and accuses them of committing fraud. They believe that the entire case is a fraud and that it is interfering with their ability to be in Iowa and New Hampshire.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The attorney general Bob, what did you think of last night today? The attorney general committed fraud. You just saw it right up there. She's a fraud. This whole case is a fraud. It's election interference. It's keeping me here instead of Iowa and New Hampshire. You just saw it. The attorney general's a fraud committed fraud.
LauraLoomer
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 7:45 PM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US Supreme Court denied Jack Smith's request to skip the appellate court in President Trump's immunity challenge. This decision is seen as a setback for Smith and those who wanted to try Trump before the 2024 election.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

BREAKING: 🚨The US Supreme Court just rejected Jack Smith’s request to bypass the appellate court regarding President Trump’s challenge to his January 6 indictments under the defense of presidential immunity. This is a major blow to Jack Smith and the Deep State who were hoping to try President Trump before the 2024 election by bypassing an appeal. BTFO JACK SMITH! #Trump2024

TomFitton
Posted - December 24, 2023 at 4:53 PM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 6:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump's lawyers argue that the indictment against him threatens the confidence of American citizens in the judicial system. They assert that under the separation of powers, the judiciary cannot judge a president's official acts. The lawyers detail how the alleged conduct in the indictment falls within Trump's official duties as president. They also argue that the failed impeachment proceedings against Trump prevent subsequent criminal prosecution on the same issues. The outcome of the appeal will likely determine whether the battle for constitutional government continues to the Supreme Court.

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

In Trump's opening appellate brief challenging the Biden regime's unprecedented attempt to prosecute a former president, Trump's lawyers lay out the dangers of Jack Smith's political attack on our constitutional republic: "During the 234 years from 1789 to 2023, no current or former President had ever been criminally prosecuted for official acts. That unbroken tradition died this year, and the historical fallout is tremendous. The indictment of President Trump threatens to launch cycles of recrimination and politically motivated prosecution that will plague our Nation for many decades to come and stands likely to shatter the very bedrock of our Republic—the confidence of American citizens in an independent judicial system. Under our system of separated powers, the Judicial Branch cannot sit in judgment over a President’s official acts. That doctrine is not controversial. It was treated as self-evident and foundational from the dawn of the Republic, and it flows directly from the exclusive vesting clause of Article II. In 1803, Chief Justice Marshall endorsed it, writing in Marbury v. Madison that a President’s official acts 'can never be examinable by the courts.' The structure of our government, the text of the Constitution and its early commentators, common-law immunity doctrines, our political history, the Supreme Court’s analogous immunity doctrines, and the policy considerations rooted in the separation of powers all dictate that no President, current or former, may be criminally prosecuted for his official acts unless he is first impeached and convicted by the Senate. Nor may a President face criminal prosecution based on conduct for which he was acquitted by the U.S. Senate. The indictment against President Trump is unlawful and unconstitutional. It must be dismissed." The brief later details how the Biden/Jack Smith operation is trying to criminalize Trump's privileged official presidential acts (citations omitted): "...all five types of conduct alleged in the indictment constitute official acts. They all reflect President Trump’s efforts and duties, squarely as Chief Executive of the United States, to advocate for and defend the integrity of the federal election, in accord with his view that it was tainted by fraud and irregularity. First, President Trump’s public statements and tweets about alleged fraud and irregularity in the federal election fall within the outer perimeter of Presidential duty, to which communicating with the public on matters of federal concern is absolutely central. This is especially apparent with respect to President Trump’s tweets; his Twitter account has been held to be an official government channel of communication based on 'overwhelming' evidence. President Trump’s other public statements are also plainly official. Second, President Trump’s communications with the U.S. Department of Justice about investigating widespread reports of election fraud, and deliberating about replacing the Acting Attorney General, are quintessential Presidential acts. The President shall 'take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,' U.S. CONST. art. II, § 3, which include the numerous prohibitions on federal election crime. Directing the Attorney General to enforce these falls squarely within the Take Care power. Deliberating about whether to replace a Cabinet-level officer is a core exercise of the appointment and removal power. Third, communications with state officials about their exercise of official duties with respect to a federal election falls within a President’s official duties. The President’s Take Care duty 'include[s] the rights, duties, and obligations growing out of the constitution itself … and all the protection implied by the nature of the government under the constitution.' This includes taking steps to ensure the integrity of federal elections, such as communicating with state officials who play a critical role in administering those federal elections. Presidential electors 'exercise federal functions under, and discharge duties in virtue of authority conferred by, the Constitution of the United States.' Fourth, communicating with Members of Congress, including the Vice President in his capacity as President of the Senate, about their exercise of their official duties lies at the core of Presidential responsibility. The President has intimate and extensive responsibility in the legislative process. Article II specifically provides that the President 'recommend to [Congress’s] Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.' This includes the Executive Branch 'mak[ing] its views known to Congress on all matters in which it has responsibilities, duties, and opinions.' Historical precedent from President Grant’s intervention in the disputed Hayes-Tilden election supports this conclusion. Fifth, organizing contingent slates of electors to support the President’s advocacy to the Vice President and Congress is likewise an official act. The indictment itself alleges that these acts were intertwined with President Trump’s attempts to lobby the Vice President and Members of Congress. Thus, they fall under the President’s official duties both because those duties extend to 'the rights, duties, and obligations growing out of the constitution itself' and 'all the protection implied by the nature of the government under the constitution,' and because they are necessary and preparatory to, and thus intertwined with, the plainly official acts of communicating with Congress about the certification of the federal election." Trump's legal team makes a key argument that the Left's failed impeachment of Trump constitutionally proscribes any subsequent criminal prosecution on the same issues: "The Impeachment Judgment Clause thus protects Presidents from harassing criminal prosecutions by requiring Congress first to make the political judgment that the President should be convicted. If, as here, the Senate acquits the President, the Senate has necessarily concluded that the President should remain in office and is not disqualified from service. For a prosecutor to conclude otherwise undermines that conclusion—indeed, a successful prosecution voids it—and arrogates to himself a judgment the Constitution reserves for Congress." During this Christmas season, let's pray the Lord showers the DC appeals court with the gifts of wisdom, discernment, and courage to confront and stop the Biden's regimes assault on the very structure of our constitutional government. For, as the DC appeals court is notoriously political and reflexively anti-Trump, it would be truly a miracle if the rule of law prevails at this stage of the legal proceedings. And, no matter what happens in the appellate court, the Supreme Court will almost certainly be the next stop in this historic battle for constitutional government.

RealAF_Patriot
Posted - December 26, 2023 at 8:12 PM
Saved - January 1, 2024 at 6:59 PM

@RealAF_Patriot - RealAF Patriot

There is no better short summary of how they stole the 2020 election from President Trump! There is no statute of limitations on TREASON! #Fix2020 https://t.co/smk6sNRLdw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Start by importing the virus into America, talk about it constantly, and blame the president. Put patients in nursing homes, resulting in deaths, and continue to blame the president. Lock down small businesses, destroy the economy, and promote mail-in voting. Incite a race war, call for riots, and choose a candidate. Lock him in his basement, shield him from the press, and ignore certain events. Disregard the economic recovery, downplay global peace, and support the police. Manipulate swing states with software, take control of polling stations, and cancel the election prematurely. Suppress anyone who notices, deny everything, and steal power from the most powerful republic in the world. It's that simple.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Start with the virus, import it into America. Talk about it nonstop. Call some governors. Not them. Not them. That's who guys. Put patients into nursing homes. Kill 1,000. Blame the president. Keep blaming. Lay them some more. Lock down small business. Kill the economy. Push mail in voting. Stoke a race war. Call for riots. Pick a candidate. No. Not her. Yeah. That's more like it. Lock him in his basement. Shield him from the press. Don't cover this. Don't cover this. Don't cover this. Keep doing that. Ignore the economic recovery. Downplay the world peace. Pump the police. Pump. Pump. Don't stop pumping. Install your software in swing states. That was fast. Take control of polling stations. Call off the election when you're a result. Kick everyone out. Pull out all the extra bells. Get the software to do its thing. Get the media to say it's over. Call the big tech guys. Ben anyone who notices. Act like the whole thing never happened. Stealing the most powerful republic in the world. It's that easy.
kylenabecker
Posted - December 29, 2023 at 4:58 PM
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 8:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss different aspects related to the accusations against Donald Trump regarding the 2020 election. Post 1 presents evidence to support the claim that Trump is wrongly accused. Post 2 questions whether Democrats want to limit the ability to challenge election results. Post 3 denies the claim that Trump sent extremists to disrupt election challenges, calling it a conspiracy theory.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Here is the proof that Donald Trump is wrongly accused of seeking to overturn the 2020 election. After exercising his constitutional right to challenge the election, this is what he said within hours of the election being certified. Case closed! https://t.co/pBcWiAZaDp

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

https://t.co/csX07ZVWGe

Video Transcript AI Summary
I address the attack on the US Capitol, condemning the violence and lawlessness. The National Guard and federal law enforcement were deployed to secure the building. Those who engaged in violence do not represent our country and will face consequences. Despite contesting the election results, Congress has certified them, and a new administration will be inaugurated. Now, we must focus on a smooth transition of power and healing. The pandemic has been challenging, but we must work together to defeat it and rebuild our economy. We need to emphasize patriotism, faith, charity, community, and family to strengthen our national bonds. Serving as president has been an honor, and our journey is just beginning. Thank you, and God bless America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would like to begin by addressing the heinous attack on the United States capital. Like all Americans, I am outraged by the violence, lawlessness, and mayhem. I immediately deployed the national guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders. America is and must always be a nation of law and order. The demonstrators who infiltrated the capital have defiled the seat of American democracy. To those who engaged in the acts of violence and destruction, you do not represent our country. And to those who broke the law, you will pay. We have just been through an intense election and the motions are high, but now tempers must be cooled and calm restored. We must get on with the business of America. My campaign vigorously pursued every legal avenue to contest the election results. My only goal was to ensure the integrity of the vote. In so doing, I was fighting to defend American democracy. I continue to strongly believe that we must reform our election laws to verify the identity and eligibility of all voters and to ensure faith and confidence in all future elections. Now, congress has certified the results. A new administration will be inaugurated on January 20th. My focus now turns to assuring a smooth, orderly, and seamless transition of power. This moment calls for healing and reconciliation. 2020 has been a challenging time for our people. A menacing pandemic has upended the lives of our citizens, isolated millions in their homes, damaged our economy, and claimed countless lives. Defeating this pandemic and rebuilding the greatest economy on earth will require all of us working together. It will require a renewed emphasis on on the civic values of patriotism, faith, charity, community, and family. We must revitalize the sacred bonds of love and loyalty that bind us together as 1 national family. To the citizens of our country, serving as your president It has been the honor of my lifetime, and to all of my wonderful supporters, I know you are disappointed, but I also want you to know that our incredible journey is only just beginning. Thank you. God bless you, and god bless America.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Do Democrats want to live in a country where you can't challenge election results in the courts and Congress? Enough of this insanity. Stop the political prosecutions against Donald Trump or the 2024 election is already rigged. Period.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Reality check: Donald Trump did NOT send unarmed redneck extremists into the capitol to disrupt the 2020 ELECTION CHALLENGES. There is ZERO evidence of this insane, implausible, and futile plot. It is pure conspiracy theory!

LauraLoomer
Posted - March 4, 2024 at 11:15 AM
Saved - March 4, 2024 at 11:29 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

President Trump calls out the DOJ for ELECTION INTERFERENCE. God help the people who are either too ignorant, too stupid or too blind to see what is happening to our country and how the attacks on President Trump are nothing more than efforts to steal the 2024 election. #MAGA https://t.co/7veZ9P5seV

ASimplePatriot
Posted - April 15, 2024 at 1:56 PM
Saved - April 15, 2024 at 2:21 PM

@ASimplePatriot - American.357

President Trump: "This is an assault on America. Nothing like this has ever happened before...This is an outrage that this case was brought. This is political persecution." https://t.co/q7txGkQqpX

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is an unprecedented assault on America, labeled as political persecution by many, including those who do not support Donald Trump. The case is seen as unjust and an attack on a political opponent. The speaker expresses pride in standing against what they perceive as an attack on the country by an incompetent leader.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is an assault on America. Nothing like this has ever happened before. Anything like this. There is no case, and they've said it. People that don't necessarily follow or like Donald Trump said this is an outrage that this case was brought. This is political persecution. This is a persecution like never before. Nobody's ever seen anything like it. And again, it's a case that should have never been brought. It's an assault of America, and that's why I'm very proud to be here. This is an assault of our country, and it's a country that's failing. It's a country that's run by an incompetent man who's very much involved in this case. This is really an attack on a political opponent. That's all it is. So I'm very honored to be here. Thank you very
kylenabecker
Posted - April 24, 2024 at 1:42 PM
Saved - April 26, 2024 at 1:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Documents unsealed by Judge Aileen Cannon reveal coordination between the Biden administration and the DOJ in the prosecution of former President Trump. The documents show conversations between the National Archives and the Biden White House about charging Trump. US Attorney General Merrick Garland's claim of independence from investigations into Trump is contradicted. Biden's DOJ instructed the National Archives on how to cover up their coordination. The Department of Energy terminated Trump's security clearance retroactively after discovering it was still active. Some argue that the Biden White House is the real criminal, prosecuting Trump for election interference.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

UNREDACTED: Judge Cannon Unseals Documents Showing Biden White House Coordinated with Jack Smith to 'Take Down Trump' Judge Aileen Cannon has unredacted a number of documents showing the Biden admin. coordinated with the DOJ prior to the FBI raid and during the prosecution of former President Donald Trump. The documents, reported by @julie_kelly2, show a number of startling developments. 1. Jack Smith hid the fact the National Archives had several conversations with the Biden White House about bringing charges against Donald Trump 2. US Attorney General Merrick Garland’s lied about “independence” from investigations into Trump. The Biden White House counsel asked to be kept 'in the loop' about criminally charging Trump 3. Biden’s DOJ instructed the National Archives on how to to cover up their coordination 4. The Department of Energy discovered Trump had an active security clearance after he was indicted so they retroactively terminated it The REAL CRIMINALS are in the Biden White House, who are prosecuting the former President of the United States for the sole purpose of committing Election Interference.

LauraLoomer
Posted - April 25, 2024 at 2:16 PM
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 8:38 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

WATCH: During his oral argument in front of SCOTUS just now, President Trump’s lawyer John Sauer made a strong point by stating that if Presidential immunity is canceled, @JoeBiden could face charges for his open borders policies. #PresidentialImmunity https://t.co/K5DGygG7cO

Video Transcript AI Summary
For 234 years, no president was prosecuted for official acts, as an energetic executive was seen as crucial for liberty. Charging a president post-office could lead to blackmail and distort decision-making. The court's decision has broader implications, questioning if past presidents could have been prosecuted. Prosecuting a president for official acts is not historical or traditional and clashes with the constitution's structure.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presidency as we know it. For 234 years of American history, no president was ever prosecuted for his official acts. The framers of our Constitution viewed an energetic executive as essential to securing liberty. If a president can be charged, put on trial, and imprisoned for his most controversial decisions as soon as he leaves office, that looming threat will distort the president's decision making precisely when bold and fearless action is most needed. Every current president will face de facto blackmail and extortion by his political rivals while he is still in office. The implications of the court's decision here extend far beyond the facts of this case. Could President George W Bush have been sent to prison for Obama be charged Could President Obama be charged with murder for killing US citizens abroad by drone strike? Could President Biden someday be charged with unlawfully inducing immigrants to enter the country illegally for his border policies? The answer to all these questions is no. Prosecuting the president for his official acts is an innovation with no foothold in history or tradition and incompatible with our constitutional structure. The original meaning of
Snowden
Posted - April 25, 2024 at 10:14 PM
Saved - April 25, 2024 at 11:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A journalist noticed and then deleted a tweet about the government's argument that no President has ever been prosecuted because no President has ever committed a crime. The suppressed source tweet is available.

@Snowden - Edward Snowden

The journalist who first noticed it deleted her tweet without explanation, but the transcript shows the government really did argue today that the reason no President has ever been prosecuted is that 𝐧𝐨 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐚 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞. Wild. https://t.co/uYxW0G8B8A

@Snowden - Edward Snowden

Here's the suppressed source tweet: https://t.co/tss2RaQBhE

SULLY10X
Posted - May 20, 2024 at 5:53 PM
Saved - May 20, 2024 at 6:50 PM

@SULLY10X - SULLY🇺🇸

Judge Merchand is interfering with an election! This is nonsense to try to destroy the reputation of President Trump. No case. No crime. This is a witch hunt conducted in order to rig an election! https://t.co/VZHGGjPWR6

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm here instead of campaigning due to a court case. The prosecution has no evidence of a crime, and experts believe the case should be dismissed. The trial is seen as an attack on Biden and a political move. The justice system is being questioned, and the judge is criticized for bias. Many feel it's a miscarriage of justice and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is viewed as corrupt and unfair. Thank you. Translation: The speaker is not campaigning due to a court case where the prosecution lacks evidence of a crime. Experts suggest dismissing the case. The trial is seen as a political attack on Biden, questioning the justice system and criticizing the biased judge. Many view it as unjust and a disgrace to the court system. The trial is perceived as corrupt and unfair. Thank you.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. I'm here instead of campaigning. As you know, I was supposed to be in a very different state this morning, and the judge actually decided to call it early. And yet, it looks like we're gonna have a very big gap between days, and it's gonna be determined right now in court. But we're here about an hour early today. I was supposed to be making speech for political purposes. I'm not allowed to, have anything to do with politics because I'm sitting in a very freezing cold, courtroom for the last 4 weeks is very unfair. They have no case. They have no crime. It's been prosecution winding down. It's always been a witch hunt with a prosecution winding down in Donald Trump's Manhattan case. We have to ask, in the immortal words of Peggy Lee, is that all there is? That's the New York Post editorial board. It's become utterly apparent, if that wasn't seen already, that the key elements to any prosecution is missing. The key element is missing, and it says, what's missing? A crime. There's no crime. You know, they go through all this stuff, and there was nothing done wrong. NDAs are perfect. And by the way, legal expenses, you know, we paid a legal expense. You know what this markdown in the book says? A legal expense. Again, it's not marked down as construction. It's not marked down as sheetrock and cinder block. It's marked down as legal expense. You have a lawyer. You pay him a legal expense, and it's governed in the book as legal expense. I had nothing to do with it. A bookkeeper put it down as a legal expense. This is why I'm here, because we called it a legal expense, a payment to a lawyer. Jonathan Turley, even liberal experts have undisputed facts of the case Mersyoti should dismiss this case. He should dismiss this case immediately. Bragg's evidence is woefully inadequate. This case should be dismissed as should have never been brought, and the judge is highly inflicted. He's a corrupt judge. He's highly inflicted. He's totally corrupt, and he's interfered with an election. Greg Jarrett, there is no credible evidence of a crime. Brad's case against the accused is beyond the limit. It isn't an audacious and let's see. It is an audacious corruption of the legal process and a very dangerous one. No fair or competent judge dedicated to upholding justice would have ever allowed such a case. It's a trade rant, and he goes on and on and on. No judge, except this one, would allow this case to continue. He's corrupt. Alan Dershowitz, who I think is standing right behind me, we have many people from congress, senators, congressmen, we've had them here all week, and I say, don't come. Come. And by the way, outside looks like he's supposed to be Fort Knox. There are more police than I've ever seen anywhere because they don't wanna have anybody come down. There's not a civilian within 3 blocks of the courthouse, but at Columbia University, you can set up a tent and burn down the doors right opposite the front entrance. It's a disgrace. Salenders with a stroke crowd is a stupendous legal catastrophe. Term. I should use it now. I will. Selected prosecution. This all comes from the white house. It all comes from the DOJ and the white house. Take a look who's in the room. This all comes from the DOJ in the White House. It's an attack on Biden, who is mentally unfit. He's mentally unfit to be the president of this country. It's an attack on his political opponent. That's all it is. All of the things you see that you saw over the last 4 weeks, most of it should have never even been brought up. And then on top of that, there's no crime. And we go on day after day and I can I tell Iowa, I'm sorry? I won't be able to make it. I tell New Hampshire, sorry. I won't be able to make it. I'm sitting in a nice box all day. Today, this is Alan Berishwitz. Today, the target is Trump. Tomorrow, it may be a Democrat. After that, you and me, who knows? The criminal justice system is on trial in New York. It's making New York state I love this state. I love the people of this state. I'm running hard in New York. I think we're gonna win New York, but it's making New York and our judicial system. And then I had judge Kaplan, who's horrible, the most biased people, and they gave me 3 judges. Ed Goren, he didn't know he doesn't know the first thing about finance. It's supposed to be a trial in front of the complex divisions of complex situations. He had no idea. He said Mar a Lago is worth $18,000,000. When it's worth a 1,000,000,000 to a 1,000,005, it's worth a 100 times the amount, 50 to a 100 times. All corrupt, and it's all coordinated. He's saying Mark Levin, John Adams, set liberty without virtue is tyranny. We have tyranny right now. We have tyranny right now, and we're disgracing our New York court system. And we're really disgracing our country because all over the world they're watching. Bill O'Reilly, Donald Trump and his family do not deserve this blatant miscarriage of justice. Don't applaud the destruction of justice because you may be on the receiving end someday. That's Bill O'Reilly and hundreds of others. I don't think there's one person that says that this trial is legitimate, and everybody's talking about the judge. The judge shouldn't be doing this trial. He's totally conflicted. He's the most conflicted judge probably in the history of the court system, and everyone knows what I'm talking about. Thank you very much.
RealSeq16
Posted - June 22, 2024 at 1:36 PM
Saved - June 22, 2024 at 2:38 PM

@RealSeq16 - Sequencer

Even Cuomo admits the case against Trump is BS! “I'm telling you, that case would have never been brought. And that's what's offensive to people. And it should be." https://t.co/ArwivnG7sC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The trial in New York, where Trump was convicted, boosted his fundraising significantly. He now leads Biden in donations. The hush money trial in New York, which the former AG brought against Trump, should not have been pursued. It seemed like a sex case and was unfair. If Trump wasn't a presidential candidate, the case wouldn't have happened. This undermines people's faith in justice.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The trial in New York, the one he got convicted for, was the greatest fundraising bonanza ever. He's now he was lagging behind Biden, and now he's pulled quite a bit ahead. That trial was the greatest reason people had to to send their checks for 5, 10, 25, whatever dollars to Donald Trump. So I I I and I was always with you on on the one in New York, the hush money trial. I don't think they should have brought that one. It was just always gonna look like a sex case, and people were always just gonna look at it that way. So anyway That Speaker 1: case, the attorney general's case in New York, frankly, should have never been brought. And if his name was not Donald Trump and he if he wasn't running for president from the former AG in New York, I'm telling you that case would have never been brought. And that's what is offensive to people, and it should be. Because if there's anything left, it's belief in the justice.
DineshDSouza
Posted - July 20, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Saved - July 21, 2025 at 6:58 AM

@DineshDSouza - Dinesh D'Souza

There is now incontrovertible evidence that Obama spearheaded a seditious conspiracy to subvert the result of the 2016 election. He needs to be held to his own standard. Let him then claim “presidential immunity” to avoid life in prison or the death penalty.

@thehill - The Hill

Former President Obama: "No one -- especially the president -- is above the law." https://t.co/MviR09arLe

TheIntelSCIF
Posted - September 3, 2025 at 10:03 PM
Saved - September 4, 2025 at 3:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve come across information suggesting that Trump has been secretly aiding in the takedown of Jeffrey Epstein and his trafficking network since the early 2000s. A lawyer for Epstein's victims stated that Trump was the only individual who assisted prosecutors in convicting Epstein, while others refused to help. Additionally, Epstein's pilot confirmed Trump was never on the Lolita Express, and Trump reportedly banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after inappropriate behavior. Victims and even Epstein's lawyer have stated there is no evidence linking Trump to any wrongdoing.

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

Trump confirmed to be secretly helping takedown Jeffery Epstein and his child trafficking network since the early 2000s. One of the Epstein victim's lawyers, Bradley Edwards, stated that Trump has been helping take down Epstein since the early 2000s and is the ONLY one to help prosecutors in convicting Epstein. Every single other person refused to help and depositions were taken out on these select individuals. Take a wild guess as to why? An older video from the early 2000s confirms exactly what the same lawyer stated about Trump helping takedown Epstein and being the only one. Epstein's own pilot also confirmed that Trump was never on the Lolita Express and never went to the island or was on any of his jets besides with Epstein himself and his brother or with his own family. There is also conformation that Trump threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago after Epstein hit on a members young daughter. Trump found out and immediately kicked Epstein out and banned him from the club for life. Every single victim of Epstein and others also were asked live on air about Trump and his involvement and they all also said "NO" that he wasn't involved. Virginia Giuffre's testimony also confirmed that Trump was never seen or involved in anything nefarious or with any other women. Epstein's own lawyer confirmed that he personally asked if Epstein had any dirt on Trump and he specifically said "NO." Julian Assange, when Wikileaks was taking off, specifically looked and asked for dirt on Trump from numerous people. He then was asked on live T.V. about it and said that he didn't have any dirt on Trump because there isn't any. Sammy the Bull, the notorious mobster also claimed that the mob approached Donald Trump numerous times and tried to buy him and blackmail him but it didn't work because he was a solid man and couldn't be bought. These are just some examples of endless amounts of poof to confirm to the population that President Donald J. Trump is not involved in the Epstein case in any nefarious way, shape, or form. You won't find any dirt on Trump because there isn't any. For the ones who are guilty, justice must be served.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "I don't understand why it's a hostile act. I talked to president Clinton... I'm sorry, president, Trump back in 2009 and several times after that. He didn't think that it was a hoax then. In fact, he helped me. He got on the phone. He told me things that were helping our investigation." Speaker 1: "The only thing... Trump is the only person who, in 02/2009, picked up the phone and said, let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us. And then we didn't have to take a deposition of him." "So Do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar A Lago?" Speaker 0: "I've definitely heard that." Speaker 2: "Epstein was inappropriate with the member's daughter. I went to mister Trump and he threw him right out." Speaker 3: "So it's your understanding then that president Trump didn't know what Jeffrey Epstein was up to?" Speaker 0: "That is correct." Speaker 2: "Epstein liked stars... He loaned Clinton his plane at least on four occasions and it was, it had to do with the foundation." Speaker 4: "The pilot said Trump was on the plane; it was actually a trip from Mar A Lago to New York, not to the island." Speaker 0: "And our investigation wasn't looking into him, but he was helping us then. He didn't treat this as a hoax. I want transparency." Speaker 3: "Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't understand why it's a hostile act. I can tell you that I talked to president Clinton I'm sorry, president, Trump back in 2009 and several times after that. He didn't think that it was a hoax then. In fact, he helped me. He got on the phone. He told me things that were helping our investigation. Speaker 1: And Bradley Edwards, attorney who's represented many of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The only thing that I can say about president Trump is that he is the only person who, in 02/2009, when I served a lot of subpoenas on a lot of people or at least gave notice to some pretty connected people that I was going that I wanted to talk to them. He is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know and was very helpful in the information that he gave and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward whatsoever, but had good information that checked out and that helped us. And then we didn't have to take a deposition of him. That was in 02/2009? That was in 02/2009. So Do you know if there's any truth to James Patterson's claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar A Lago? Speaker 0: I've definitely heard that. Speaker 2: Apparently, there was a member and Epstein was inappropriate with the member's daughter. The other piece, and I interviewed a woman who would run the spa there, and I said, do you know Jeffrey Epstein? She said, oh yes. She said, he used to come over to the spa and I found him to be inappropriate with the girls, the young girls there. And she said, I went to mister Trump and he threw him right out. Speaker 3: So it's your understanding then that president Trump didn't know what Jeffrey Epstein was Speaker 0: up to? Speaker 2: That is correct. Epstein liked stars. I mean, one of the weird ones is Stephen Hawking. He did take Stephen Hawking to his Lolita's Island, which is really odd, but and he loaned Clinton his plane at least on four occasions and it was it was, and I'm not just saying this because, you know, because I know the president, but, it had to do with the foundation. Speaker 4: And lo and behold, the top story is Epstein had Trump on the plane. Yeah. Trump so you got, like, I don't know, like, 50 trips with with Bill Clinton. He's not mentioned, but Trump is mentioned. But, Mercedes, are you aware of the the detail that came out today when the pilot, Epstein's pilot, was asked specific questions about high profile people such as Trump. And, do you know what he said? Speaker 3: Tell me what he said. Speaker 4: I thought you'd find this interesting. He says, yes. I did have, Trump on the plane as the as the headlines of, the judge report are blazing in red. However, I wasn't down to Lolita. It was actually a trip by, like, Mar A Lago to New York. He wasn't he wasn't actually going to the island. Speaker 0: And our investigation wasn't looking into him, but he was helping us then. He didn't treat this as a hoax. So at this point in time, I would hope that he would revert back to what he was saying to get elected, which is I want transparency. This about face that occurred, none of us understand it. In fact, I don't understand how this is a a an issue that's even up for debate. How do you not stand behind these women after you've heard their stories and know that hundreds of them were abused and it was only because files are being kept in secrecy. Speaker 3: I do have to ask, and I know and it's just something that that I think we're compelled to at this moment with the attention on president Trump, with these questions around a pardon. Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No.
View Full Interactive Feed