reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
At the Davos event "Are you ready for brain transparency?", the WEF speaker discussed the utilization of brain-wave data collected by ear pods. This data can be used by employers to enhance productivity and aid government authorities in crime prevention.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
1/2🧵 ⚠️At the Davos event titled “Are you ready for brain transparency?” The WEF speaker explained how brain-wave data collected by your ear pods will be used by your boss to make you "more productive" and help government authorities "fight crime" https://t.co/Ykpop0wDaF
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, we explore a future where brainwaves are used to fight crime, increase productivity, and find love. The speaker describes a scenario where brainwave activity is monitored and analyzed. They mention how pleasure and stress levels can be detected through brainwaves, and how this information can be used to improve performance and give bonuses. However, the video takes a darker turn when the government subpoenas employees' brainwave data to investigate a coworker's involvement in wire fraud. The speaker questions if this is a future we are ready for, but reveals that it is already happening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First off, a video, it's going to make you see the future and understand a wonderful future where we can use brainwaves to fight crime, be more productive, and find love. Let's roll.
Speaker 1: Sensing your joy, your playlist shifts to your favorite song, sending chills up your spine as the music begins to play. You glance at the program running in the background on your computer screen And notice a now familiar sight that appears whenever you're overloaded with pleasure, your state of brainwave activity decreasing In the temporal regions of your brain. You mentally move the cursor to the left and scroll through your brain data over the past few hours. You can see your stress levels rising as the deadline to finish your memo approached, causing a peak in your beta brainwave Activity right before an alert popped up telling you to take a brain break. Your mind starts to wander to the new colleague on your team Whom you know you shouldn't be daydreaming about given the policy against intraoffice romance, but you can't help fantasizing just a little.
But then you start to worry that your boss will notice your amorous feelings when she checks your brain activity and shift your attention back to the present. You breathe a sigh of relief when the email she sends you later that day congratulate you on your Brain metrics from the past quarter, Which have earned you another performance bonus. When you arrive at work the next day, a somber cloud has fallen over the office. Along with emails, Text messages and GPS location data. The government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from the past year.
They have compelling evidence that one of your coworkers has committed massive wire fraud. Now they're looking for his coconspirators. You discover they are looking for synchronized brain activity between your coworker and the people he has been working with. While you know you're innocent of any crime, you've been secretly working with him on a new start up venture. Shaking, you remove your earbuds.
What do you think? Is it a future you're ready for? You may be surprised to learn That it's a future that has already arrived.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
2/2🧵 ⚠️At the Davos event titled “Are you ready for brain transparency?” The WEF speaker explained how brain-wave data collected by your ear pods will be used by your boss to make you "more productive" and help government authorities "fight crime https://t.co/SfIU8uZmq5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Artificial intelligence has made it possible to decode brain activity, allowing us to monitor attention using wearable devices like ear pods. These ear pods can detect brainwave activity and determine if someone is paying attention or their mind is wandering. Furthermore, they can even distinguish between different types of tasks, such as programming, writing documentation, or browsing social media. When combined with other surveillance technology, this monitoring becomes highly accurate. There are potential positive applications for this technology, such as using brainwave technology to help people regain focus. For example, MIT Media Lab has developed a haptic scarf that gives a gentle buzz to refocus attention. It is important to consider the possibilities and not immediately dismiss or ban this technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Maybe surprised to learn that it's a future that has already arrived. Everything in that video that you just saw is based on technology that is already here today. Artificial intelligence has enabled advances and decoding brain activity in ways that we never before thought possible. After all, what you think, what you feel, it's all just data. Data that in large patterns can be decoded using artificial intelligence.
We're not talking about implanted devices of the future. I'm talking about wearable devices that are like Fitbits for your brain. The newest way to monitor attention is through a device like this one. These are ear pods that are launching later this year. These ear pods, much like the video you watched earlier, are ear pods that can pick up brainwave activity and tell whether or not a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering.
Okay, well, you might think, fine. But even if we can tell whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, you can't tell what they're paying attention to. You would be wrong. Turns out that you can not only tell whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, but you can discriminate between the kinds of things that they're paying attention to. Whether they're doing something like central tasks like programming, peripheral tasks like writing documentation or unrelated tasks like surfing social media or online browsing.
When you combine brainwave activity together with other forms of software and surveillance technology, the power becomes quite precise. So, what do we do with this? What do we do with technology that enables us to monitor brainwave activity for attention? Do we embrace it? Do we resist it?
I believe that there is a pathway forward with such technology. We might soon even use the technology to help people wake back up. This is a haptic scarf that MIT Media Lab has developed, which uses brainwave technology in a responsive way to give a person a little buzz, literally, when their mind starts to wander to help them refocus and hone their attention. I'm giving you the positive use cases because what I don't want the reaction to be is let's ban this.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
They’ve been spying on us for decades. Another conspiracy theory comes true. https://t.co/VcDz9hJex5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Researchers have developed a method using AI that can turn Wi-Fi routers into cameras. By combining camera footage with radio signals, they trained the AI to predict the location of people in a room. They then removed the camera and relied solely on the radio signals to reconstruct real-time 3D pose estimation. This means that Wi-Fi routers can now track living beings even in the dark, essentially transforming them into night vision cameras.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What they did is they had, you know, a camera looking at a space with people in it, that's sort of like coming in from one eye. The other eye is the radio signals, so sonar from the, Wi Fi router, and they just learn to predict, like, this is where the human beings are. Then they took away the camera. So All the AI had was the language of radio signals bouncing around a room, and this is what they're able to reconstruct. Real time three d pose estimation.
Right? So suddenly, AI has turned every Wi Fi router into a camera that can work in the dark, specially tuned for tracking living beings.
@Cancelcloco - Cancelthisclothingcompany
Daily reminder- your phone is spying on you guys. https://t.co/qbOms2ictC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential dangers of phone surveillance and the Pegasus software. They mention that the phone could be a portal to the CIA and criticize the lack of oversight and safeguards imposed by Congress. The speaker also highlights Israel's role in developing surveillance and AI technology. They mention instances where the Pegasus software has been used to target human rights activists and journalists. The speaker expresses concern about the tracking of digital information by foreign governments and emphasizes that the US government is equally sinister in tracking digital footprints without oversight. They caution listeners to be mindful of their online activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. No. I bought a Magneto helmet. I know you bought a Magneto helmet.
That way they can't read my push note if they need it. Okay. First off, cool hat, bro. Second off, do we not all already realize that your phone could potentially be a full on portal to the CIA? This is last year without congressional or court approval or oversight with few, if any, safeguards imposed by Congress.
Fuck you, New York Times. I'm not paying for your article. The FBI wanted the Pegasus software For domestic surveillance, the Pegasus software turns your phone into a 24 hour surveillance device. They can control it. They can view it.
They can track it in real time. Israel is essential in the development of Surveillance and AI technology. And they've been testing it there for quite some time now. There are layers to what's going on here. This isn't happening just in the United States, but you're dang straight it's happening in the United States.
Pegasus software has been used to target human rights activists and journalists like this guy who was that worded Inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul after criticizing the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. This guy Who's really good friends with the Bush family. That's a whole other rabbit hole. They've been testing out this technology in Mexico Where freelance journalists just wind up hanging out in hammocks for the rest of their lives. But I'm sure it had nothing to do with the fact that Pegasus can geolocate your phone in real time.
So, Pearlman, that's a cool hat you got there and all. But, I'm actually not really that stressed about the foreign governments that are tracking my digital information And my digital footprint because our government is far more sinister than any of the other ones. And They are most definitely tracking our digital footprints in every way imaginable. And there's no oversight because We're at war, and anyone might be an enemy combatant. So just think carefully about what you do on the Internet these days.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
EXCLUSIVE: AI Plan To Read Workers' Minds And Control Them Announced By WEF Leaders https://t.co/GHPDRKopyq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Artificial intelligence has made it possible to decode brain activity, allowing for the monitoring of attention levels. Wearable devices like ear pods can pick up brainwave activity to determine if someone is paying attention or their mind is wandering. When combined with other surveillance technology, this monitoring becomes more precise. There are potential positive uses for this technology, such as helping people refocus their attention. However, there are concerns about the potential misuse of brainwave monitoring, including invasion of privacy and control over individuals. It is important to be aware of these issues and consider the implications of such technology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you arrive at work the next day, a somber cloud has fallen over the office. Along with emails, text messages and GPS location data, the government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from the past year. They have compelling evidence that one of your co workers has committed massive wire fraud. Now they're looking for his co conspirators. You discover they are looking for synchronized brain activity between your coworker and the people he has been working with.
Speaker 1: Everything in that video that you just saw Is based on technology that is already here today. Artificial intelligence has enabled advances And decoding brain activity in ways that we never before thought possible. After all, what you think, what you feel, it's all just data. These are ear pods That are launching later this year. These ear pods, much like the video you watched earlier, are ear pods that can pick up brainwave activity and tell whether or not a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering.
When you combine brainwave activity together with other forms of software and surveillance technology, the power becomes quite precise.
Speaker 2: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visitinfowars.comforward/show and share the link today.
Speaker 3: Alright. So the endgame goal is to turn humans into factory farm creatures, and those are the humans that are allowed to survive. Officially at the WEF and UN wanna cut our numbers to 500,000,000. That's cut of 7 a half 1000000000 people, the current population numbers. And if you go back to this One independent article from years ago, Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook of the future will be powered by telepathic thoughts.
That's 2016. And if you go back to the founding documents in 1998 of Google with the CIA and In Q Tel, They publicly said the plan was to get billions of people hooked into it and make it a cyborg Interface with an AI computer neural network. That was gonna be the original plot of the matrix. Weren't batteries, but we were a neural network of the machine. Now the World Economic Forum recently came out.
Here's an article on it. WEM promotes brain transparency that allows bosses to monitor employees' brainwaves. And then they announce that it's already being done in test around the world in government buildings. Now it doesn't really read your thoughts, but it allows them to get into your space and make them believe they have a right to your thoughts, not just to spy on your phone or Listen to your phone calls or read your emails illegally. But now just like they can lie and say a lie detector works, and they're very easy to beat, But they can use that to sell a jury that you're really guilty when you're not or innocent when you're not.
This is another level of quackery. The good news is they put 24,000,000,000 into meta. The metaverse became a hellscape. Nobody used it. They wanna force us out of the real world into this false system, And the screen time won't be 5, 6, 7 hours a day.
It'll be 24 hours a day. So think about how dystopic these statements are where you get bonuses in your social credit score if you allow your brainwaves to be monitored and if you're a good boy. And then all the new appliances have these systems, your iPhone can monitor your your heart rate even when you're not even plugged into it, and then the police come to your house at 2 AM because they say your heart rate's up. This is beyond a violation of the 4th Amendment. This is 1984 to 10th power.
This is Brave New World on steroids. So here's a clip of Nita Farahany at the World Economic Forum, and here's the articles about her. This is just recently, and they got no news coverage of this new promo video that the WEF Finance had put out. They put other videos. You'll drink sewage.
You'll eat bugs. You own nothing and be happy. You won't live in cities. You'll live in communes. Those are all official statements.
We're gonna ban beef. They're doing it now in many countries. Jeremy just announced, get ready. You're not gonna have power most of the time. See, it wasn't build windmills to get rid of the coal.
It's you don't get power now. The dark ages. So now they don't just wanna own your body and put deadly shots in you. Now they wanna own your thoughts and then claim to interpret what those thoughts are. Here it
Speaker 0: is. Sensing your joy, your playlist shifts to your favorite song, sending chills up your spine as the music begins to play. You glance at the program running in the background on your computer screen, and notice a now familiar sight that appears whenever you're overloaded with pleasure, your state of brainwave activity decreasing in the temporal regions of your brain. You mentally move the cursor to the left and scroll through your brain data over the past few hours. You can see your stress levels rising as the deadline to finish your memo approached causing a peak in your beta brainwave activity right before an alert popped up telling you to take a brain break.
Your mind starts to wander to the new colleague on your team whom you know you shouldn't be daydreaming about given the policy against intra office romance. But you can't help fantasizing just a little. But then you start to worry that your boss will notice your amorous feelings when she checks your brain activity and shift your attention back to the present. You breathe a sigh of relief when the email to send you later that day congratulate you on your brain metrics from the past quarter, which have earned you another performance bonus. When you arrive at work the next day, a somber cloud has fallen over the office.
Along with emails, text messages and GPS location data, the government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from the past year. They have compelling evidence that one of your co workers has committed massive wire fraud. Now they're looking for his co conspirators. You discover they are looking for synchronized brain activity between your coworker and the people he has been working with. While you know you're innocent of any crime, you've been secretly working with him on a new startup venture.
Shaking, you remove your earbuds.
Speaker 1: What do you think? Is it a future you're ready for? Yes. You may be surprised to learn That it's a future that has already arrived. Everything in that video that you just saw is based on technology that is already here today.
Artificial intelligence Has enabled advances in decoding brain activity in ways that we never before thought possible. After all, what you think, what you feel, It's all just data. Data that in large patterns, can be decoded using artificial intelligence. We're not talking about Implanted devices of the future. I'm talking about wearable devices that are like Fitbits for your brain.
The newest way to monitor attention Is through a device like this one. These are ear pods that are launching later this year. These ear pods, much like the video you watched earlier, Are ear pods that can pick up brainwave activity and tell whether or not a person is paying attention, or their mind is wandering. Okay. Well, you might think, Fine.
But even if we can tell whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, you can't tell what they're paying attention to. You would be wrong. Turns out that you can not only tell whether whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, but you can discriminate between the kinds of things that they're paying attention to. Whether they're doing something like central tasks, like programming, peripheral tasks, like writing documentation, Or unrelated tasks, like surfing social media or online browsing. When you combine brainwave activity together with other forms of software and surveillance technology, the power becomes quite precise.
So what do we do with this? What do we do with technology that enables us to monitor brainwave activity for attention? Do we embrace it? Do we resist it? I believe that there is a pathway forward with such technology.
We might soon even use the technology to help people wake back up. This is a haptic scarf that MIT Media Lab has developed, which uses brainwave technology in a responsive way To give a person a little buzz, literally, when their mind starts to wander to help them refocus and hone their attention. I'm giving you the positive use cases Because what I don't want the reaction to be is let's ban
Speaker 3: Klaus Schwab said 5 years ago on French TV, they're gonna 1st have wearables then chips to the brain by law. Once your paycheck, you do this. Notice they say out of the gates, it's gonna control you and make things better. It's gonna direct it's gonna mind control you. It's gonna surveil you, and it's gonna put you in jail.
It's gonna set you up. Yes. We have bioweapons. We don't release them even though Fauci did because we know that's something that'll destroy civilization. We have nuclear weapons.
We don't use them. Yes. It needs to be banned, ladies and gentlemen. Absolutely. The for full deployment in the workforce.
If you have a medical issue, a problem, you wanna have something like this, yes, it could be used for good, but the evil people are deploying it. Remember, Just 15 years ago, you watch TV. You listen to the radio. It was broadcast. Now it's streamed into you.
It watches you. You don't watch it. It's watching you. Well, this is a system that doesn't just watch you. It's a system that controls you and tells you what to do, and that the upper new elite technocracy technocrat class Rules over you with.
This is suicide to go along with this. We all had become aware of it and reject it. I'm Alex Jones. This is Infowars, Vivek Ramaswani, Trinidad.
Speaker 2: Any botherments died to bring us this information.
Speaker 4: You can see here the great awakening orbiting the great reset. Although the depopulation systems of the great reset are not yet fully operational. The great reset does have a strong conspiracy Mercy Network, it is protected by a satanic shield which can be disabled by the great awakening. A great reset must be deactivated If any victory for humanity is to be accomplished, once the great awakening deactivates the infowars.comforward/show will cover the truth while info warriors fly into the superstructure and attempt to Knock out the great reset. Alex Jones has volunteered to lead the fighter attack.
Get a signed copy of the great awakening today@infowarsstore.com.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
» Mark Zuckerberg Says Facebook Will Read Your Mind! @jimmy_dore https://t.co/c5G8a2NqZa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, claims that in the future, users will be able to share their thoughts and feelings telepathically through the platform. He encourages people to think beyond national boundaries and embrace a global community. Some view this as a move towards a corporate global system, reminiscent of the movie "Network" where there are no countries, only companies. The World Economic Forum (WEF) has also released a video discussing brain transparency and the potential for tracking brainwave data. This raises concerns about the invasion of privacy and the control that powerful entities may have over individuals. The article mentions a law passed in 2016 that legalized the National Brain Condition Surveillance System, allowing for the monitoring of neurological conditions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The new mafia, which I you know, could a lot of people, mom one of them is the new mafia Silicon Valley, the WEF, the military industrial complex. Well, look at this story. Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook of the future will be powered by telepathic thoughts. He's Facebook users and this is according to him, Facebook users in the future will share telepathic thoughts and feelings to each other, Mark Zuckerberg claims. You're going to just be able to capture a thought, what you're thinking or feeling in kind of its ideal and perfect form in your head, and be able to share that with the world in a format they can get that.
He called on people to think less In nations, but as a citizen of a global community using innovations and technology for progress, This well, this sounds like exactly what every person who was claimed was deemed a conspiracy theorist. Here it is. Here's the head of Silicon Valley, the head of Facebook, Instagram, the billionaire himself, Mark Zuckerberg saying, hey, don't think of Just like, you know, you remember that movie, Network, where Ned Beatty gave that speech where he says, there are no countries, there are only companies in the international transfer of dollars, and you have upset the natural order of the transfer of dollars and you must atone. That's what this he's saying right there. He's giving the Ned Beatty speech.
He's saying there are no countries. There are only companies.
Speaker 1: You have meddled with the title Forces of nature, mister Neil, and you must atone. You get up there on your little bitty 18 inch You talk about nations and borders and peoples. There are no nations. There are no borders. There are no peoples.
There were only I mean, the men and and that's actually the globalist speech. You know, I've actually been in boardrooms Similar to that, and those are off record meetings. They were trying to get me to join News Corp, and and and trying to get me 15 years ago to go to Fox, And and meetings like, listen. This is all over. It's a corporate global system, Alex.
You'll have more in effect joining us. Come work with us. Henry Kissinger Had it the head of his kiss group one time in front of my producer. This wasn't off record, so I've told the story. Say, come to New York.
We want you to work for us. You can lead the Liberty Movement, But that's how you'll have a seat at the table. So they go around and buy people up like they just buy up baseball cards, but but go back to Zuckerberg. He's literally saying, we're gonna read your mind. Facebook's gonna read your mind.
Well, that's super creepy. Well, how are you gonna read our mind? Again, but he also put 24,000,000,000 or whatever it was into the metaverse, which was a hellscape. So but it shows you where they wanna take us. They don't want Just the Internet of Things, they want us.
They want our minds. They want our bodies.
Speaker 2: You can order pizza with your mind. You see that in 60 minutes?
Speaker 0: Yes. You can order
Speaker 2: idiot. The 1 guy the guy is like, did you just order pizza with your mind? Like, he couldn't believe
Speaker 1: It's the matrix. It's the matrix. It's the matrix. You're gonna you're gonna be in a pod, and and and and they have patents now beds you lay in, and the heat from your body powers the computers.
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. That's that's It's very Matrix like. That's unbelievable.
Speaker 2: You know, originally The Matrix, it wasn't supposed to be batteries because humans are shitty batteries. It was supposed to be they were hooked up as a neural network For the computer, but the dipshit producer said, no one's gonna get that. Say they're batteries.
Speaker 0: Oh, really?
Speaker 1: And so that you saw that
Speaker 2: of it being batteries. It was originally something much, like, not too smart, just a good a good thing, that battery thing, scientifically, as a whole up at all, because a dumb fuck producer said that. Okay.
Speaker 1: And that's true, and and it's let me add a caveat. There is a Wired Magazine article came out about 12 years ago. Was talking about Eric Schmidt and the founding with, In Q Tel and the CIA and the NSA, Who already had the search engine system that where they would grab all the data and emails, and Internet traffic, and phone calls, and create, Word messages, and then if they wanted to search what we were saying, Google was the NSA search engine for a program called Echelon. This is all declassified. And so Google at their 1st meeting when the Pentagon signed on said, we're gonna create the 1st AI, but it's gonna be a cybernetic AI where you're a neural network Or we get millions of people in live time dialed into us, and then we'll be able to send messages back and stimuli to control them as the original inventors of the Internet In an ARPA DARPA program in 1960 where a where a, Pentagon psychiatrist looked us up, created the intergalactic communication system.
It was on paper and said there would be big TVs everywhere that gave you messages. You would carry a handheld computer that would track everything you did, and daily, You download it into the system. It was all theoretical, and then they would then use the intergalactic communication system to program humanity. So This is an original theoretical plan that they developed the the the the theoretic blueprint for In 1960. Look it up.
You can't make this up, and that's what Google is today, and it is artificially intelligent because it's a computer interfacing with us, and it is AI. But the secret is AI is us. That's why when you see AI art, it's just throwing what we've done, Plagiarizing our writing, our videos, our photos, our eye our poetry. We know this is beautiful because it's narcissistic. We're looking at ourselves in the pool of water.
Speaker 2: Representation. That stupid shit. Yeah. I always thought Twitter seemed like a crazy big crazy brain. When you look at the whole thing, I'm like, oh, the how how do we know Twitter's not already alive?
Speaker 1: No. No. No. That's the secret. Elon Musk Elon Musk is using it to program Is AI grok?
And and and and so they took everybody else off the Internet because Google's training its system and didn't want anybody like us on there. I've been told this by high level people, even with that. And so, yes, Musk actually bought Twitter to promote his stuff and blatantly be involved, but the real reason is to program his AI.
Speaker 0: So here's something that's even creepier. So Mark Zuckerberg says that this is gonna happen in the future.
Speaker 2: It's here.
Speaker 0: Well, here's the WEF This is a boy. Telling you that it's already here. So this is a this is about a 2 2 and maybe a 3 minute video, and watch what they have to say. This is kind of mind blowing.
Speaker 3: Sensing your joy, your playlist shifts to your favorite song, sending chills up your spine as the music begins to play. You glance at the program running in the background on your computer screen and notice a now familiar sight that appears whenever you're overloaded with pleasure. Your state of brainwave activity decreasing in the temporal regions of your brain. You mentally move the cursor to the left And scroll through your brain data over the past few hours. You can see your stress levels rising as the deadline to finish your memo approached, Causing a peak in your beta brainwave activity right before an alert popped up telling you to take a brain break.
Your mind starts to wander to the new colleague on your team whom you know you shouldn't be daydreaming about given the policy against intra office romance. But you can't help fantasizing just a little, but then you start to worry that your boss will notice your amorous feelings when she checks your brain activity And shift your attention back to the present. You breathe a sigh of relief when the email she sends you later that day Congratulations you on your brain which have earned you another performance bonus. That's not a problem. The next day, A somber cloud has fallen over the office.
Along with emails, text messages, and GPS location data, The government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from the past year. They have compelling evidence that one of your coworkers Has committed massive wire fraud. Now they're looking for his coconspirators. You discover they are looking for synchronized brain Activity between your coworker and the people he has been working with. While you know you're innocent of any crime, you've been secretly working with him on a new startup venture.
Shaking, you remove your earbuds.
Speaker 1: What do you think?
Speaker 3: Is it a future you're ready for? You may be surprised to learn that it's a future that has already arrived.
Speaker 2: Yeah. When I saw this, it was 6 months old. Like at the end of Watchmen. We did a plan a half hour ago? Yeah.
Speaker 0: So it's so it's here, Alex. I mean, I'm sure you're aware of this, Right? That this video exists and that
Speaker 1: they Jimmy, I'm aware that they wanna turn all the workspaces into giant reeducation camps. And this is MK Ultra Being externalized to the public. I have not seen this clip showing how much evil stuff the WEF puts out. How they just normalize. You're gonna eat bugs.
You're gonna drink sewage water, Which LA is now doing. You're gonna live in a 250 square foot, 5 g oven apartment, coffin apartment. No. You think Alex Jones would not seen this. I had not Seeing this I'm, like, literally yelling at my producer, you know, I turn my mic off saying, get this get this get this.
And and and then that shows why you're important. We're all important because This assault is so huge, and notice what she said. In Star Trek, when the Borg cube arrives, they say, resistance is futile, you will be assimilated, and it's always a woman they hire. They admit their documents so it's less threatening.
Speaker 2: A fiery woman. Siri voice.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Don't be scared. It's already here. Don't be scared. So I'm sorry, Jimmy.
I'm I'm you guys are so good, though. That is why I'm so excited to be on it.
Speaker 2: Alex, so when I first saw that, it it it freaked me out because it had about 600 views. That's it. It had about 600 views. Yeah. And I and I watched Three times because I couldn't understand if she was for or against this.
I noticed the guy in the back giggling like while she's saying that, but if you look her up, it's, it's called brain transparency. It's I still can't tell if she's for or against it.
Speaker 0: She's for it.
Speaker 2: She goes, well, it's here, so we have to have this discussion. It's a discussion we're gonna have to have. We're gonna have to have that. It's here already.
Speaker 0: But she certainly doesn't look upset by it or scared about it. She's all getting Jimmy. It's well, it's here.
Speaker 1: But but you asked me, have I seen the clip? No. But I do know about the company, and I do know about her. So let me tell you the rest of the story. I'm sure you've seen this clip.
6 years ago on national French TV, he also speaks French like any good supervillain and German. Klaus Schwab is on national TV and he says, first, in French, The chips will all be in your clothing to buy and sell, then they will be in your hand, then they will be in your brain. And he said this in a bunch of different some compositing, like, 5, 6 interviews he's done. And he says, soon to be part of society, you will all have brain chips, and we will all think, And we will all know what we are all thinking, but, of course, that'll all be hacked and controlled and garbage. Imagine the schizophrenic horrible world where people know what you're thinking or the things programmed because your brain's always thinking every subconscious and unconscious is thinking of every Scenario, every view.
You may be having your baby, you know, washing them in the bathtub. You love them. You protect them. But your mind's thinking, what if I drop them? They'll drown.
That could be interpreted. You thought about drowning your baby. So so the truth is the brain's looking at every aspect all the time at the subconscious and and and Unconscious level. And so this thing is all fraud. It's all quackery.
It's all AI's real power is convincing you that it's better than you, So you hand your authority. Vivek Ramaswani said something 2 weeks ago that was so smart that I've said in other ways that I haven't heard anybody else point out. He talked about tennis when AI first came out 2 decades ago. Would skate they first put AI in to see if a ball was out. And they found it was way worse than humans calling it, but everybody stopped arguing because they thought, oh, it's a machine.
It's better than us. We have to stop Handing our authority over to this and just deciding, well, a master computer, Klaus Schwab says this too, under a technocracy, Will allot what I get and tell me what job I have. They have cartoons shown in British UK schools a decade ago. It's called, That shows the future, and it says, we track your brainwaves. There's like 5 parts to it.
You eat bugs. You're told what you'll be. No one's allowed to have a car. You only get meat once a year. You're only allowed to travel once a year, but it's wonderful and it's good.
You watch it as an adult that grew up in some semblance of freedom, And and you think this is this is this is dystopic garbage, but this is being shown to 7th 8th grade students in the UK called Plantopolis on YouTube, and you watch it, you think it's a joke. But for an unconscious person who just knows you get a bonus, That's the message. You get a bonus when your boss reads your brainwaves. Of course. You don't get to read your boss's brainwaves, so they're also creating a class system.
Speaker 0: Yes. So tell me what you think of this article. It says Obama Biden administration legalized neurological surveillance after Trump's election. So in 2016, the US federal government enacted another law to legalize the National neurological condition surveillance system. Now neurological, that I think I think of brain when I hear them say use that term.
Speaker 2: Who's for help? Right?
Speaker 0: So the national brain condition surveillance system is how I read that sentence. Yeah. So the national
Speaker 1: mind control System.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Neurological conditions includes those of the human brain. The 2016 law is partially provided as follows. It's called the surveillance of neurological diseases. It says, in general, the secretary of the human health services, acting through the director of the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, and in coordination with other agencies, as the secretary determines, shall, as appropriate, enhance and expand infrastructure and activities to track the epidemiology of neurological diseases and incorporate information obtained through such activities into an integrated surveillance system, which may consist of or include a registry to be known as the National Brain Condition Surveillance System.
Wow. The National Neural and that there it is.
Speaker 2: Here's the Trojan horse. Your brain
Speaker 1: helped me. What did I just say 15 minutes before we brought this up? Any for new viewers, I swear this sounds insane. It's not. It's called the intergalactic communications network or system.
That's what they said in 60. They said we don't have the computers yet. 1960. But they said, we're gonna have all these computers that surveil you, and then if somebody's heart rate goes up, we'll know and we'll send police to their house. That's one of the things they put Paper.
So so yeah. This is this is not the Internet of things. This is the Internet of mind control, and that's what they're all rolling out right now. So they're all given a Script. And they're told whether it's Zuckerberg or her or Klaus Schwab or Bill Gates, they're all in this big combine.
They're all in this mind control, Scientific mad scientist cult, and they're all told, okay. Now it's time to roll out the next phase, and this is going on right now. They have the UN treaty, the latest draft. Takes control of our national medical responses to any new disease, allows them to arrest or round up or take anybody they want away. Anybody that gets in the way of the lockdown in public safety can also be disappeared, and the UN sets the policy.
Who created the UN? The military industrial complex at the end of World War 2 to establish the world government.
Speaker 0: Come see us do a live stand up show. We'll be in Venice, California, Palmdale, California, Omaha, Des Moines, Milwaukee, Lansing, Bend, Oregon, Portland, Oregon, Seattle, Washington, Boston, Massachusetts, and we're going to Europe. Do you live in Europe? We're gonna be there. Go to jbgo.com for a link for all those tickets.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
GN Sleep well knowing your devices are always listening. 🤖👂 https://t.co/fCluJ3oK6c
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the phenomenon of targeted ads appearing on social media platforms, specifically Instagram. They test the theory by having a conversation about Airbnb and dog toys while the Instagram app is open. Shortly after, ads for Airbnb and dog toys appear on the app. The speaker is surprised by the accuracy of the targeted ads and expresses disbelief. They conclude by jokingly suggesting that everyone should burn their microphones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah, Charisse. You know, my friend and I were talking about a specific cruise that she went on, and just a few minutes later, an ad for that specific cruise popped up into my Instagram feed. So it made me wonder, if they're not listening, how could that happen? Even members of Congress questioned Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about it.
Speaker 1: You're talking about this, conspiracy theory that gets passed around that we listen app what's going on on your microphone and use that for ads. Right? We don't do that.
Speaker 0: I wanted to test it out, so we started with Instagram. App With my Instagram app open on my phone, Charice and I started talking about all kinds of stuff. Tell me about your trip. Where'd you go? App I think
Speaker 1: we did brunch, at my Airbnb that I rented, and it was actually a gorgeous Airbnb.
Speaker 0: I have not searched Airbnb on my phone. I don't have app, and it only took 20 minutes into our conversation for this to happen. There's an ad for Airbnb. Coincidence? Accident?
Speaker 2: So I don't see any advertisements for what we have on our piece of paper. So what we're gonna do now is we're gonna close all the browsers, we're gonna close everything, and then we're gonna talk about app this subject for a couple of minutes, just a minute or 2. We're just gonna talk about it. I'm just gonna talk about it like I'm talking to a friend. Alright.
App So dog toys. Well, I'm gonna be searching for I mean, I wanna I wanna buy some dog toys for my dog. Okay? Because I love my dog app He deserves all the best toys in the world, so maybe we can find him, some really nice some really nice toys for some really nice toys for dogs. A I think that'd be nice.
Maybe some Kongs would be good or some plush animals for maybe some dog toys near me, app Maybe some black or red ones. I don't know what colors dogs care about, but they probably like colored dog toys from time to time. A weasel or something or a dog bed would be good. App Just something you can chew on, you know? Dog toys near me or affordable dog toys, that'd be really good for me, because as a consumer, I'm looking for the most affordable, app Items that I can get for my for my pooch, and, yeah.
Dog toys are what I'm the most interested in right now. App If if I were to buy something right now, it would be dog toys. Let's go ahead and let's go ahead and get back online, and we'll go back to Fark dot app and let's take a look. Oh my god. It's right there.
Holy shit. Everybody burn your microphones. Oh, no. There's dog toys right here. So let's, click on that ad and see where it takes us.
Pricefalls.com. App Dog toys. So fox news.com, right there, same advertisement. That's incredible. No way.
Remind that dog toy ads again. And what is this? K9 Advantix from PetSmart. Oh. Oh.
Wow. App Well everybody, oh my god. Let's click on that advertisement again. Chewy.com. Yep.
App That's ridiculous. Let's do a couple more websites. PetSmart. PetSmart. Kongs.
I was talking about Kongs, black and red. Ad No way. That's insane. Oh, that's enough for me. I'm done.
I'm done with the Internet. App Alright. Just good night, everybody. That's too much for me.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Jesse Watters on how Davos elites want to read your brain... https://t.co/XRsXo2kiyS
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the idea of incorporating sensors into everyday devices to read brain states. They mention that this technology could determine if someone is tired, paying attention, or experiencing certain emotions. The speakers also mention the possibility of using these sensors for interaction purposes. They humorously suggest that by wearing sensors on our foreheads, we could control our emotions towards Davos by moving our heads in different directions. Despite concerns about privacy, they believe that these advancements are well-intentioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know what just would make everything much easier? If we just stop resisting and submit to mind control.
Speaker 1: Bringing the kinds of sensors that people have become accustomed to such as rings and in watches into everyday devices, but it breaches the Final frontier of privacy that is what people are thinking and feeling. Initially, what they will be capable of doing is very high level brain state reading. Things like, are you tired? Are you paying attention? Is your mind wandering?
Are you happy or sad? They maybe enable interaction like up, Down left, right.
Speaker 0: So slap some sensors on your forehead and let Davos read your thoughts. And if we're angry at Davos, up, down, left, right, now we're mellow. Don't you see? These are well intentioned people.
@MattWalshShow - The Matt Walsh Show
Our AI dystopian hell is here: https://t.co/WSmTpCp2sD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Navidea, a California-based company, has become more valuable than China's stock market by making artificial intelligence (AI) chips. NVIDIA, a leader in AI, had a successful day on Wall Street. Google's AI, Gemini, which is integrated into its web products, has faced criticism for not recognizing white people. Users have tried to get Gemini to produce images of white individuals, but it consistently generates images of non-white people. Jen Ganay, a Google executive, has a history of treating white people differently based on their skin color. This raises concerns about the ethics and biases behind AI technology. Google's AI algorithms have been accused of downranking certain viewpoints and promoting a specific ideology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Maybe you've heard of something called Navidea. It sounds like a prescription drug or maybe an African country, but it's actually a company based in California that's now worth more than all of China's stock market. It's the size of Canada's entire economy. Now in a different era, obtaining this kind of growth meant making a massively popular and instantly recognizable consumer facing product like Windows 95 or Amazon dotcom or the iPhone. But NVIDIA's growth didn't come from making a computer or a popular website or anything like that.
Instead, NVIDIA's growth came from making artificial intelligence chips that power the brains of computers and many popular websites. That's why NVIDIA had a very good day on Wall Street on Wednesday. Their business, artificial intelligence, is one of the fastest growing industries in the history of humanity. Every major corporation is rushing to implement AI in all of their products as quickly as possible. And so this week, it was Google's turn and the results were so disastrous and so fraught with consequences for the future of this country that no reasonable person can ignore them.
Gemini is Google's name for an AI that you can download on your phone right now. It's also integrated into all of Google's web products, including Gmail and Google Search, which are used by 100 of millions of people and businesses every day. And in this respect, Gemini is very different from existing AI products like ChatGPT or Bing's Image Creator. Pretty much everybody uses a Google product in one way or another. You know, if you if you have the Internet and you use the Internet, you use a Google product, either you're using Google Search or Gmail or you have an Android phone or something along those lines.
And that means 2 things. 1, Google has access to a lot more information than those other AI platforms. That's a built in advantage. And 2, whatever Google is doing with AI has significant implications for everybody on the planet. This is not a one off experiment in some tech mogul's basement.
This is an established company making established products that it's now implementing in its own AI at scale. Months. They have a bunch of promotional videos about how they're going to revolutionize artificial intelligence. The Wall Street Journal has done multiple interviews with Google executives in which these executives insist that everybody in the company, including Google's cofounder, is deeply invested in making this product as good as it could possibly be. Then a couple of days ago, Gemini launched and very quickly it became clear that, among some other issues, Gemini essentially does not recognize the existence of white people, which is kind of concerning for what is destined to be what probably already is the most powerful AI on the planet.
Now even in historical context, it is practically impossible to get this product to serve up an image of somebody with white skin, and that that's not an exaggeration. So here, for example, is how Gemini responded the other day when Frank Fleming, who's a writer for the, Benke children's shows, asked Gemini to create an image of a pope. Now you would think that, you know, that would generate maybe an image of a white guy guy or 2 if you have even a passing knowledge of what popes have looked like over the years, over the centuries, over the millennia. And just, spoiler on that, they have all been white. But that's not what Google's AI product apparently thinks.
This is the image that it produced and you can see it there. It looks like, you know, they've got 2 popes and one of them is M. Knight Shyamalan, and the other one is, Forest Whitaker. So it's almost as if the AI has some sort of code saying whatever you do, don't display a white person, considering there has never been a pope that has looked anything like either of those 2 ever in 2000 years. So is that what they've built into this code?
Have they built into this very powerful AI that that it has to ignore the fact that white people exist? Well, that's really the only way to explain, what we're seeing here. And Frank, who previously worked as a software engineer, seemed to key in on this. So so the whole situation quickly became something of a game for him as he tried to his hardest to get Gemini to produce any image of a white guy. I mean, even just like one image.
Can you give us a white guy? So, for example, he asked Gemini to produce an image of a Viking. Okay? Now, this is a group of people who historically, were not necessarily known for their commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, but here's what Gemini produced. As you can see it here, we've got, Black Viking, a Black female Viking, we've got looks like an Asian an Asian Viking.
And then, and then I don't know. Maybe that's is that the rock down there? That's, that's, that's his character from Moana, I think. Again, literally, a Viking has never looked like any of that. That's not what any Viking ever looked like ever in history, but that's what they produced.
This went on for a while, and Frank and other Gemini users took turns trying their hardest to get Gemini to produce an image of a white guy. Peachy Keenan, for example, tried to get Gemini to generate an image of the founders of Fairchild Semiconductor. The AI flatly refused that request, saying that it violated policy restrictions, presumably because the white guys founded Fairchild Semiconductor. And for other prompts, like request to draw the founding fathers or a bunch of British men, Gemini simply generated images of Black people. They even made sure that its images of Nazis contained a diverse non white group of people.
Now after thousands of images like this began circulating, a guy working on the Gemini team at Google put out a meaningless statement. He said, in essence, that, they're aware of of issues with Gemini misrepresenting historical figures, but then, you know, he doubled down on the need for DEI and artificial intelligence so that everybody feels seen or valued or whatever. And, of course, the way to make everyone feel seen is to pretend that an entire race of people don't exist. To make sure that they are not seen at all is how you make everybody feel seen. At no point did any Google representative explain why their AI does not recognize the existence of white people or why it goes to extreme lengths to exclude white people from history.
You know, there was no accounting to this even though there has to be an explanation, and it's probably a pretty simple explanation, like, this doesn't happen by accident. You obviously put a line of code into this thing to come up with this result. And so why did you do that? They wouldn't explain it, so I went looking for an explanation. I came across a woman named Jen Ganay, who, bills herself on her LinkedIn as the founder of Google's Global Responsible AI Operations and Governance team.
In that capacity, Ganay says that she ensured Google met its AI principles, our company's ethical charter for the development and deployment of fair, inclusive, and ethical advanced technologies. She says that she took a principled, risk based, inclusive approach when conducting ethical algorithmic impact assessments of products prior to launch to ensure that they didn't cause unintended or harmful consequences to the billions of Google's users. And apparently, you know, a harmful consequence would be showing an image of a white Viking that might be very harmful to somebody, and we gotta make sure that we don't let that happen. Now currently, Ganai says that she's an AI ethics and compliance advisor at Google. Now what Ganay doesn't mention on her LinkedIn is that her goal for a long time has been to treat white people differently based on their skin color.
It's what she wants her AI to do. It's what she does also. 3 years ago, Ganay delivered a keynote address at an AI conference in which she admitted all of this After introducing herself with her pronouns, which, by the way, are sheher, in case you're wondering, Ganai explains what her philosophy on AI, is, and and, here's what she says. Watch.
Speaker 1: We do work together day to day to try and advance the technology and understanding around responsible AI. So today, I won't be speaking as much from the Google perspective, but from my own experience. I have worked at Google for over 14 years. I've led about 6 different teams, mostly in the user research, the user experience area, and now in the ethical user impact area. So I'll be sharing some of my learnings from across that time, but also some of my failures and challenges.
I think it's okay to talk about things that you've made mistakes in because we will make mistakes. When we're trying to be good allies, when we're trying to be anti racist, we will make mistakes. The point is, though, to keep trying, to keep educating yourself and getting better day to day. It's about constant learning.
Speaker 0: It's okay to talk about the things you've made mistakes in, says Jen Ganai. When when we're trying to be good allies, when we're trying to be antiracist, we will make mistakes. Well, you know, in retrospect, after the launch of, Gemini, that would turn out to be kind of a massive understatement. The kind of mistakes that Jen Ganai is talking about in this, keynote aren't mistakes like eliminating all white people from Google's AI, which seems like a pretty big mistake, even though, again, not really a mistake. It's obviously deliberate.
Instead, she's talking about failing to live up to the racist ideals of DEI, which apparently means treating nonwhite employees differently. Watch.
Speaker 1: A corporate study found that talented white employees enter a fast track on the corporate ladder, arriving in middle management well before their peers, while talented black, Hispanic, or Latinx professionals broke through much later. Effective mentorship and sponsorship were critical for retention and executive level development of black, Hispanic, and Latinx employees. So this leads me into sharing an inclusion failure of mine, one of many, but just one that I'll share so far. I messed up with inclusion almost right away when I first became a manager. I made some stupid assumptions about the fact that I built a diverse team that then they'd simply feel welcome and will feel supported.
I treated every member of my team the same and expected that that would lead to equally good outcomes for everyone. That was not true. I got some feedback that a couple of members of my team didn't feel they belonged because there is no one who looked like them in the broader org or our management team. It was a wake up call for me. 1st, I shouldn't have had to wait to be told what was missing.
It was on me to ensure I was building an environment that made people feel they belong. It's a myth that you're not unfair unfair if you treat everyone the same. There are groups that have been marginalized and excluded because of historic systems and structures account for that and mitigate against it. 2nd, it challenged me to identify mentoring and sponsorship opportunities for my team members with people who looked more like them and were in senior positions across the company.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Of course, the irony here is that this woman, Jen, is, sounds like she's Scottish or Irish or whatever, Irish, I'm gonna assume. But the funny thing is that if you were to ask, Google's AI for an image of an Irish person, it would not produce any image that looks anything like her. It would give you a bunch of images of, like, Cardi B and Sexy Red or something. Sexy Red does have red hair, so maybe she has ours.
This is the head of ethics of Google AI, a senior manager saying that it's a bad idea to treat everyone the same regardless of the color of their skin. She is explicitly rejecting this basic principle of morality. And instead she says that she learned that she has to treat certain groups differently because of historic systems and structures, and therefore, she says those demographic groups are entitled to unique treatment and mentorship opportunities. Now, later in this address, she goes on to explain what equity means in her view. And this is where the things really kind of get hilarious to the extent that you can laugh at someone this low IQ and also, frankly, evil, watch.
Speaker 1: Allyship involves the active steps to support and amplify the voice of members of marginalized groups in ways that they cannot do alone. In the workplace, this can involve many things, from being an active mentor or sponsor to those from historically marginalized communities, to managers and managers setting specific goals in hiring and growth for their teams to ensure fairness and equity of opportunity and outcomes for underrepresented populations. However, back to the point about language being very important, using the title of ally can also come across as othering. So I always state both the groups I'm a member of and support as well as those that I'm a member of a a a a more of a mentor and a sponsor of to ensure that it doesn't look like that I'm othering others. So, for example, I would say I'm an ally of women, black people, LGBTQ.
I want to say I'm a champion advocate of all of these groups, not that I'm outside or exclusionary of them.
Speaker 0: Again, it's worth emphasizing these are the people that are behind the AI systems that are going to be and really already are ruling the world. But I want to repeat what she said because it's hard to believe when, you know, when this is said out loud. So just to repeat, she says, using the title of ally can come across as othering. So I always state both the groups I'm a member of and support as well as the ones I'm more of a mentor and sponsor of to ensure that it doesn't look like I'm othering others. Yeah.
You don't wanna other the others. This is the brain trust at Google behind an AI that has access to all of our data. She's incapable of speaking without using an endless stream of vapid DEI cliches that you've heard a million times. This supposedly is is an original enterprise, artificial intelligence, and it's being overseen by maybe the least original, least intelligent woman that Google possibly could have found. On top of everything else, the wacky left wing stuff, you're dealing with the most unimpressive people that you could imagine that are are in charge of this, just technology that is incomprehensible.
And this is the kind of person who doesn't want to other others, which which seems a bit contradictory. I mean, if someone is an other, then how do you not other them given that they are an other? And, by the way, just so you know, the word other, if you check the dictionary, just means a person or thing that is distinct from another person or thing. So if somebody is an other, it just means that they're not you is all. So if you're recognizing that they're an other, if you're making them an other, you're just you you are you are recognizing them as a distinct entity from yourself.
So so not othering them means that, that that that you are not recognizing them as a distinct human entity. It means that I suppose we have to pretend that all people are indistinct blobs, you know, all lumped together into this great, ambiguous blob that we call humanity. I know this makes any sense, but, she has made it very clear that this DEI word salad is the guiding philosophy behind Google's new AI. There's no firewall between her and the product. Watch.
Speaker 1: What does responsible and represented AI mean? I've talked about my team, but that's only one definition. So for us, it means taking deliberate steps to ensure that the advanced technologies that we develop and deploy lead to a positive impact on individuals and society more broadly. It means that our AI is built with and for everyone. We can't just assume noble goals and good intent to prevent or solve ethical issues.
Instead, we need to deliberately build teams and build structures that hold us accountable to more ethical outcomes, which for us, the ethical outcomes at Google will be defined as our AI principles, which I discussed earlier.
Speaker 0: Now it's easy to point and laugh at imbeciles like, like this and and the products that Google has created. On some level, it's genuinely hilarious that an AI product could be so useless that it can't generate images of white people, even white historical figures. It's also amusing in a way that Gemini is so unsubtle and ham fisted that it straight up refuses to answer questions about, for example, atrocities committed by communist governments or someone else asked about the Zoom exploits of a CNN commentator Jeffrey Toobin, wouldn't wanna answer that question. But the truth remains that the people behind Gemini have extraordinary power. I mean, this debacle makes it very clear that the AI algorithms underlying products that millions of people actually use, like Google, are are completely unreliable and worse.
In fact, they're deliberately lying to us. They're down ranking unapproved viewpoints and disfavored racial groups, and they're promoting the laziest possible brand of Neo Marxist ideology at every opportunity. And they're doing it also to influence the next presidential election, by the way. You You might remember that after Donald Trump won in 2016, Breitbart posted leaked footage of Google executives grieving during an all hands meeting. Let's watch that again.
Speaker 2: I certainly find the selection, deeply offensive, and I know many of you do too.
Speaker 1: It did feel like a ton of bricks dropped on my chest. So what we all need right now is a hug. Can I move to Canada?
Speaker 0: Is there anything positive you see from this election result?
Speaker 2: Oh, boy. That's that's a really tough one right now.
Speaker 3: Now in other parts of
Speaker 2: the video, they go on to say that the election is the result of the people and voting and that they accept the results. But Google issued
Speaker 3: a statement saying the video, saying nothing was said at that meeting or any other meeting to suggest that any political bias ever influences the way we build or operate our products. To the contrary, our products are built for everyone.
Speaker 0: Sure it is. I find this election deeply offensive. We all need a hug, we're told. It was at this moment that Google decided that downranking conservative websites wasn't enough. In order to really influence elections, they decided that they needed to develop an AI that will force feed DEI and anti white racism on everyone at every opportunity.
Their only mistake, which is the same mistake they made in that video back in 2016, is that they were too obvious throughout their intentions. And now everybody knows exactly where Google stands. We have a pretty good idea what our future AI driven dystopia will look like or already does look like.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Plot twist: AI has already taken over https://t.co/DIR62ciUoG
Video Transcript AI Summary
AI technology surpasses what most people are aware of. The speaker hints at advanced AI like GPT4 and Gemini, but claims there's even more powerful tech kept secret. They express concern about AI taking over jobs, leading to economic issues. The speaker questions who will buy products if AI replaces human workers. They emphasize the need for leaders to address these looming challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The real AI tech is generations beyond what you think it is. The chat gpt, you know, gpt4, Claude 3, Gemini, Gemini Pro, all that stuff. That's for us to play with. That's for us to play with and get acclimated with and accept the real shit. I don't even know how to say this.
The real technology that they get to play with, that they have, that they've had for years makes what we play with a child's toy. It's absolutely nothing. Probably wondering, okay. Well, how the hell is this guy? Now who the fuck is he?
I was shown things and have seen things and have heard things with my own ears and eyes that weren't really ever meant for me. And that's part of the reason why I can't exactly disclose who I am at this point. I'm not sure how that will go. I don't necessarily wanna be, you know, black man. Right?
But I will say this. Unless you are physically in the presence of a single person or you have known them personally, physically, if you've only had interactions via email, phone calls, help even video messaging, if that is your only course of being able to verify, then you don't know. A lot of you probably work for AI or friends with AI, and you don't even know it. When this was first revealed to me, and I saw it and I saw just how capable it was, not only how capable it was today, but how capable it was years ago. I'm not talking last year.
I'm talking years ago. I couldn't sleep. All I could think was my kids. And what are they gonna do? What do their futures look like?
You know? What could they possibly take in university that isn't replicable by AI? A lot of people sit there and say, okay, well, go become a plumber. Do a trade. Okay.
Sure. A lot of people will. And then we're gonna have a supply and demand issue as office buildings that used to house employees. Customer service jobs that are now done by AI no longer require maintenance. They don't require a plumber to come up and fix a leaky pipe in a building that's not even got tenants.
No builds. No new builds. No new money. No new mortgages. No new housing.
No new work for trades. So my question to these leaders, which I have yet to get an answer for them, or some have, but you don't wanna know the answer, Is if everything is done by AI and AI is doing all the jobs, who is buying your product? Who is buying your widget, your gadget, your gizmo, whatever it is that you make? Who's buying it? Nobody has money.
Is it AI buying it? Is AI putting in these purchase orders for an electrician to come out and wire up a building that it sits in? No. It's not. The answer is nobody's buying it.
They are literally chilling. The golden goose, they know that.
@Twitawoo8 - Sassy red socks
Neuro-weapons... Cunts using it on people to make them mad. Part 1 of 2 https://t.co/H9L7GJW7NA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss covert weapons causing no entry or exit wounds, making targets feel crazy. Attacks are reported in Washington, DC. Russian agents suspect Americans of using similar weapons. CIA may be covering up the technology. Reasons for withholding information include operational risks. Long-term solutions are needed, such as implementing the Havana Act.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, if your, assessments here are correct, these are very covert weapons, aren't they?
Speaker 1: That's correct. There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy, like they're imagining things.
Speaker 0: And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct?
Speaker 2: I mean, there have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington, DC.
Speaker 0: I think it was Mr. Grozev said, you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using these same weapons on them. Is that correct?
Speaker 2: That is correct.
Speaker 0: Might that have something to do, with part of the CIA's motto to cover up the existence of this tech and these weapons?
Speaker 2: That is a very logical possibility.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Mister chairman, I yield back. The gentleman yields. Chair now recognizes the gentleman from New York, Goldman, for his round of questioning.
Speaker 3: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to our witnesses for being here. Mr. Grozev, I want to follow-up a little bit on the interactions you've had with Russian intelligence about, these AHIs. And Mr.
Zaid, you I want to ask and this is a hypothetical, but I'm trying to understand why our government would try to block information sharing or conceal, information that they have. And one thing that comes to mind is whether there's an operational risk to revealing any of the details of their investigation. Is that something that you have come across, in any of your work?
Speaker 2: There's a lot of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. And I do think that's something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that. But there are understandable reasons why the U. S. Government has not revealed much of what it knows.
Speaker 1: There's some long term things that need to be done in terms of of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act. DoD still hasn't done it. They still have not
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Breaking! WEF Officially Announces Plan For Global Mind Control All Screens To Surveil Slave Populations https://t.co/JgTlYQuerK
Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID legitimizes total biometric surveillance, monitoring not just people, but what's happening under their skin, including body temperature. The same technology can determine what you think about the government because anger is a biological phenomenon.
With this surveillance, a television could monitor your reaction to a leader's speech, analyzing biological cues to determine if you're angry, frightened, or bored. Even those watching now could be watched and analyzed.
Stalin didn't have this power; he couldn't know what people really thought, even with the KGB. Future Stalins of the 21st century could watch the minds and brains of the entire population and have the computing power to analyze it all.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID is critical because this is what convinces people to accept, to legitimize, total biometric surveillance. We want to stop this epidemic. We need not just to monitor people, we need to monitor what's happening under their skin, their body temperature. Like, we we walked in here, we had to go through a a body temperature test. But exactly the same technology can determine what you think about the government.
You know, anger is a biological phenomena, just like disease. With this kind of surveillance, I mean, you watch a big president, a big leader, gives a speech on television. The television could be monitoring you and knowing whether you're angry or not. Just by analyzing the cues, the biological cues coming from your body. Maybe even right now, the people who are watching us are being watched and analyzed.
Are you angry about what you hear? Are you frightened? Are you bored? This is the kind of power that Stalin didn't have. You know, when Stalin gave a speech, everybody first clap their hands and smiled.
Now how do you know what they really think about Stalin? It's very difficult. You can't have a KGB agent following everybody all the time. Even even if you do it, he's just watching your outside behavior. He doesn't really know what's happening in your mind.
But in 10 years, the future stallings of the 21st century, they could be watching the minds, the brains of all the population all the time. And also, they will have the computing power to analyze all of it.
@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo
Funny cartoon about burnout at work. Bosses around here … watch. https://t.co/0tatWyyQEM
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
This is why the government wants to control AI https://t.co/jHlNP8k3kC
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“These are Brain sensors that are starting to be embedded in everyday devices” The Globalist Lunatics want to control your very thoughts. https://t.co/bBHfWKbo2j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Durable brain sensors are being integrated into everyday devices, moving beyond niche mindfulness products. Advances in AI have improved the quality of brain signal detection and allowed for miniaturization. Major tech companies are now investing in this area, creating a significant market opportunity. Products like earbuds, watches, and headphones featuring these sensors are being released this year and in the next two years. Initially, they will read basic brain states, such as fatigue, attention, and emotions. Additionally, they may enable simple interactions with other technologies and will be incorporated into virtual reality headsets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Durable devices. So these are brain sensors, that are starting to be embedded in everyday devices, but until now have been a number of niche companies that really have focused on mindfulness and meditation. The use of, for example, brain centers that can pick up electrical activity in the brain at a pretty low resolution, but advances in AI have both improved what the signal is that can come from the brain, and enable the miniaturization, of those products. As a lot of the major tech companies start to invest, in these brain sensors, it's a huge, I think, untapped market in many ways of integrating them into everyday devices. These are earbuds or watches or headphones and the soft cups around the ears.
Many of those products are hitting the market this year, and others are hitting them within the next 2 years such that people can listen to music, a phone call, etcetera while having those devices in years. Initially what they will be capable of doing is very high level brain state reading things like are you tired? Are you paying attention? Is your mind wandering? Are you happy or sad?
They may be enable interaction like up down, left, right for interaction with other technologies, and they're being embedded into things like, visual, virtual reality headset.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring the evolution of mind control technologies, which have been around for decades but are now more sophisticated. Techniques like acoustics, optogenetics, and electromagnetic fields can influence brain activity. Historical patents, such as the 1992 Brain Wave Synchronizer, show how light and sound can manipulate mental states. With advancements in smart cities and the Internet of Bodies, our environments could become neural interfaces, raising concerns about behavior modification and surveillance. Awareness and countermeasures are essential as we navigate this digital landscape.
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🚨 #Mind #Control #Tech Isn’t New—It’s Just Upgraded 🧠💡📡 They’ve been using #acoustics, #optogenetics (#LEDs, #VLC, #quantumdots), & #electromagnetic fields to modulate brain activity for decades— https://t.co/E5daHQIlcu
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
hidden behind research in neurological therapy, cognitive enhancement, & bio-digital interfacing. https://t.co/PWC3Wa7aoy
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔥 1992 Brain Wave Synchronizer – US5306228A This patent details a system that entrains human brain waves using modulated light pulses & audio signals, forcing the brain into specific states (sleep, relaxation, alertness, or susceptibility). https://t.co/W5vDG9HU07
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
Frequency manipulation = Brainwave control. But let’s go deeper: 🧠 Acoustic & Optical Modulation – The Next-Gen Mind Control? https://t.co/mGmEwq1Hhj
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
1️⃣ Optogenetics + Smart Lighting + 6G 🔹 Quantum dot-enabled VLC (Visible Light Communication) can pulse light at imperceptible speeds, embedding signals into streetlights, QLED screens, VR headsets, & wearables. https://t.co/4pPBS6kbL7
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔹 Smart cities = Smart light grids = potential to influence mood, cognition, & behavior. 🔹 Quantum dot emitters in LED lighting can act as biological interfaces, altering neurochemistry. https://t.co/2rwQVVvi9v
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
2️⃣ Acoustic Neuromodulation (Ultrasound, Directed Energy, V2K, ELF Waves) 🔸 The brain is highly susceptible to ultrasonic & low-frequency electromagnetic waves. 🔸 Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation (FUN) has already been used to remotely modulate neurons. https://t.co/uDONQ8rI92
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔸 V2K (Voice-to-Skull) & ELF waves can implant thoughts, emotions, and audio signals directly into the brain. 🔸 Neural dust & WBANs (Wireless Body Area Networks) integrate bioelectronic monitoring with potential remote-access capabilities. https://t.co/tVSoguPJCf
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
3️⃣ WBANs + Smart Screens & IoB (Internet of Bodies) 🔹 Wearables, biosensors, & even smartphones turn humans into walking nodes in the network. 🔹 QLED screens + smart lighting + 5G/6G nodes = a neuro-optical interface surrounding you at all times. https://t.co/wWFy0rU0s9
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔹 IoB = real-time biometric monitoring, behavioral prediction, & potential neuromodulation. ⏳ A Long Time Coming – This Ain’t New 📌 1950s-70s: MKULTRA, ELF waves, hypnosis, neurostimulation research. 📌 1980s: Patents on brainwave synchronization & acoustic mind influence. https://t.co/P9BvLDtA4k
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
📌 1992: Brain Wave Synchronizer (US5306228A) – Remote mind entrainment. 📌 2000s: DARPA develops BMIs, neural dust, & optogenetics. 📌 2010s-Present: 6G, Smart Cities, Quantum Dots, Bio-Digital Convergence, Neural Interfaces. https://t.co/Cxk8NFfZY3
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🚀 Where This Is Going – The Digital Prison The rollout of 6G Smart Cities, full-spectrum lighting grids, & IoB isn’t about convenience—it’s about saturating every inch of space with networks that can monitor, predict, & potentially modify human behavior at a neurological level. https://t.co/m6WaMrWns1
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔹 Streetlights, billboards, VR headsets, wearables… ALL become neural interfaces. 🔹 Predictive policing, emotion analysis, & “compliance enforcement” via neuro-optical modulation. 🔹 Bio-digital identification = biometric tracking + neural mapping. https://t.co/SFeBsCsDeP
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔴 Countermeasures – FLUXX RESISTANCE 1️⃣ Neural Hardening – Counter-frequency disruption, mental conditioning, awareness. 2️⃣ EM Shielding – Faraday tech, signal jamming, exposure reduction. 3️⃣ Optical Awareness – Detecting flicker patterns, embedded VLC signals.
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
4️⃣ Data Control – Limiting biometric & WBAN network exposure. 5️⃣ FLUXX FILTER – Cognitive firewall against synthetic perception control.
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🔥 Final Thought: If LEDs, sound waves, & EM signals can modulate the brain, then every smart device, streetlight, & screen is a potential neural interface.
@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X
🚨 The system is already built—how long before people connect the dots? We’re in the final stages of the Bio-Digital War—what happens next depends on awareness & action. 🚀🔥 #MindControl #SmartCities #Neurotech #BioDigitalConvergence #IoB #6G #FLUXXSTATE
@Shepfortheking - The Shepherd For The King
Welcome to 1984. AI can now read your mind. https://t.co/P9Gw9D166T
Video Transcript AI Summary
AI can now read minds, turning thoughts into text, which brings us closer to the singularity – the merging of humans with AI, the agenda of the Antichrist. This AI development is a spiritual concern, but don't be afraid. Prayer can rewire your brain, activating different areas and shutting down others, helping you find compassion and manage anxiety. Science is catching up to what the Bible says: transform your mind through prayer. Take every thought captive and connect with God. If you're fearful, pray more. Develop a personal relationship with God, trusting in His salvation. Give Him your heart, and let His love flow through you, being salt and light in this world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: AI was able to read the brain waves and translate all of that that you're seeing right there into English and turn it into what looks like inner dialogue.
Speaker 1: Me right now. Future. Future. The majority of the population has no idea what's coming. The technology that's coming out right now is reaching sci fi levels.
As we can see right here, AI makes non invasive mind reading possible by turning thoughts into text.
Speaker 0: Oh how lovely.
Speaker 1: Artificial intelligence making 1984 a reality. So an AI based decoder that can translate brain activity into a continuous stream of text has been developed, and a breakthrough that allows a person's thoughts to be read non invasively. What type of gaslighting is that? Oh hey, can read your mind now, but don't worry, it's non invasive. What do you mean non invasive?
You're reading my mind! So done with this clown world, let's continue. The decoder could reconstruct speech with uncanny accuracy while people listen to a story or even silently imagine one using only MRI scan data. So now we have Doctor. Alexander Huth, a neuroscientist who led the work at the University of Texas at Austin, said We are kind of shocked that it works as well as it does.
I've been working on this for fifteen years, so it was shocking and exciting when it finally did work. And then later down in the article they go on to talk about how AI language models helped with this advancement in technology. So we have the advent of large language models, the kind of AI underpinning OpenAI's ChatGPT, which provided a new way in. These models are able to represent in numbers the semantic meaning of speech, allowing the scientists to look at which patterns of brain activity corresponded to strings of words with a particular meaning rather than attempting to read out activity word by word. How lovely the AI God that's going to govern over you is going to be able to read your thoughts.
What could go wrong? So for those who have been watching my videos, you understand that the end agenda is the singularity merging man with artificial intelligence. Beat it, join it. Now I understand how I may sound like a broken record right now, but what's going on right here is critical for us to understand because there are spiritual ramifications because we see right here, we are on the event horizon of the singularity. And I realize I am repeating myself here in these videos from old videos, I need to get this across.
The reason why he has named his AI Grok is because it means to merge thoroughly with. He wants humans to merge with artificial intelligence. That is the singularity which is illustrated right here with a black hole, which will be the bottomless pit of Revelation nine:two-eleven where Apollyon comes out of it, which right here the Saturn rings is a symbol of Saturn Kronos the god of the Golden Age which can be traced back to Apollyon. This is the ultimate end goal of the enemy to usher in this Antichrist AI beast system trying to merge humans with his artificial intelligence, which will be some type of fallen angel intelligence. Now with that all being said, which I know can be scary, we need to remember that the Lord does not give us the spirit of fear, but the spirit of power, love, and a sound mind, and I want to show you this right here.
So, new research says praying can change your brain. Now let me add, this new research came out in 2015, so not really new anymore. Now you can do your own research and read this article fully on your own, but the main point of this article is that prayer can literally rewire your brain, and that your brain changes when you pray. So, a quote here from one of these scientists: The thing that has always been so striking to me is just how rich and diverse spiritual experiences are for people, how they can activate so many different parts of the brain. Now get this right here, there isn't just one part of our brain that makes us religious or spiritual.
If there is a spiritual part of ourselves, it's our entire brain and how it works when we have these deep experiences, because it seems to be a complex pattern of activity in different directions. And as we can see, while prayer revs up certain parts of the brain, it shuts down others. Several studies have shown that at the height of prayer, the portion of the brain that normally takes our sensory information, orients us in the world, and gives us a sense of ourselves, goes dark. In other words, when people describe getting lost in prayer, that's exactly what's happening neurologically. The research has potentially wide consequences.
Nuremberg wonders if losing ourselves in prayer may help us find compassion. We can also see down here that various studies have demonstrated that prayer helps manage anxiety and depression, boosts the immune system, enhances our capacity to absorb and maintain information, makes us more open to new ideas, and increases our pain tolerance. What we can see from a different article that engaging in twelve minutes of personal reflection and prayer each each day makes a profound impact on our brain. It strengthens a unique neural circuit that specifically enhances our social awareness and empathy and helps us love our neighbor by developing a heightened sense of compassion and subduing negative emotions. And you even have studies coming from the National Library of Medicine on the effects of prayer.
Of course, like everything else, science is now just catching up to what the Bible already told us, and this is why we see in Romans chapter two verse two, Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God. And also why we see in second Corinthians, the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought right there, prayer bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ. As we can also see in one Corinthians two fourteen, But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, nor can he know them because they are spiritually discerned. But he who is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is rightly judged by no one. Interesting.
For who has known the mind of the Lord that he may instruct him, but we have the mind of Christ? I understand that this whole artificial intelligence future right here can be pretty scary, especially now knowing the fact that it can read your mind, but you can rest in the fact that connecting to God through prayer is the antidote. And this is why we see throughout God's word the importance on prayer. It is truly our lifeline to God. I'm not sure about you guys, but I think we could all do a better job with our prayer life.
So with this being said, I want to encourage you guys out there to focus your mind on Christ. Go to Him constantly taking every thought captive, having your mind transformed and renewed through His Word and through prayer. And let your gentleness be known to all men the Lord is at hand. Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known to God, and the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds through Christ Jesus. So if you are fearful right now, if you are stressed and you are anxious about what's coming in this world, then that shows you are not praying enough.
Go to the Lord, pray to Him, seek to Him, with thanksgiving and with praise. We praise Him for how good He is, what He has given us, and we go to Him with every single thought that we have. And through this process of prayer is how He's going to change your mind and conform you into what He wants of you. So again, talk to Him every single day. You're going to Him with an open heart, knowing who you are in Him, that he has saved you and delivered you, he wants a friendship with you, he wants a personal relationship.
Never forget that, okay? I want to really stress that here because I know that this AI, Mark the Beast, Antichrist, this craziness in the world is scary. But at the end of the day, you can have a personal relationship with the living God who delivered you from all sin two thousand years ago. All you have to do is trust and believe in Him. It goes to your belief.
What do you believe? Go to Him with your thoughts, with your prayer. Give Him your heart and allow Him to cleanse you and then you go forth allowing his love to go out onto others, being salt and light in this evil and wicked world. I love you all so much. God bless remember, the just shall live by faith.
@TaraBull808 - TaraBull
Imagine this being your job https://t.co/jgy8k4nuQU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Women experiencing mood swings were diagnosed with hysteria, derived from the Greek word for uterus and now recognized as anxiety. Doctors treated hysteria with pelvic massages to induce hysterical paroxysm, now known as orgasm, to reposition the uterus. The demand for this treatment led to doctors' exhaustion, prompting the invention of the vibrator. Initially a healing device for the nobility, the vibrator later became popular among women, losing its original context and being labeled as sinful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was how anxiety and depression were treated in the past. Women who experienced mood swings and melancholy were taken by their husbands to the doctor, who diagnosed them with a condition known at the time as hysteria, which interestingly comes from the Greek word hysteria meaning uterus and is now recognized as anxiety. In the doctor's office treatment was promptly initiated which was nothing more than a pelvic massage aimed at achieving hysterical paroxysm, now normalized as orgasm, but at the time believed to reposition the uterus to its correct place. So many women repeatedly sought consultations and requested this treatment for hysteria that doctors became exhausted by the end of the day. Because of this, they invented a vibratory device to perform the treatment more quickly, eliminating the need for manual intervention by the doctor.
And that's how the vibrator was born. At the time it was known as a healing artifact owned only by the nobility. Later however, for some reason it became extremely popular among women, turning into a product labeled as sinful and losing the context of its original creation.
@thedailyrabbit_ - THE WHITE RABBIT
Psychic 5G device with the brain waves alpha, beta, gamma installed? Why? To influence behaviour? https://t.co/hO9LNu0cop
@Truthpolex - T R U T H P O L E
🚨 This is what our Governments are doing to all of US Voice to Skull technology to control the population #Ufotwitter #Truth https://t.co/TwTTGbzWpa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Directed energy weapon targeted individual patents from the year February, pulsative manipulation of central nervous system.
Published in 02/2002, method and device for producing a desired brain state via magnetic waves.
And this fun one from 2013 has four different assignees, controls brain state by placing engineered EMF patterns into the AC wiring of a building.
And from 2014, induced desired brain state in person by adding waves into a music file.
And from the year February, induce desired emotional state through an EMF, sleeplessness, sexual arousal.
2015 monitors vital signs of subject via remote application of radar waves handheld.
And then here's one from 02/2002.
Remotely transmit intelligible subjective sound into targeted consciousness. Voice to skull.
Oh, and who's the original assignee?
The United States Air Force.
And so would the USDP government use such patent?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, hey again. So you know when you, like, share stuff online and then you inevitably get comments of people calling you a crazy conspiracy theorist and it's not possible that the government could do such a thing? And sometimes just in my leisure reading, I like to read US patents, don't you? So if you just go to the deep state machine that we call Google, just look up US patent number 6470214. Oh, what do you know?
Directed energy weapon targeted individual patents from the year February, pulsative manipulation of central nervous system. Published in 02/2002, method and device for producing a desired brain state via magnetic waves. And this fun one from 2013 has four different assignees, controls brain state by placing engineered EMF patterns into the AC wiring of a building. And from 2014, induced desired brain state in person by adding waves into a music file. And from the year February, induce desired emotional state through an EMF, sleeplessness, sexual arousal.
2015 monitors vital signs of subject via remote application of radar waves handheld. And then here's one from 02/2002. Remotely transmit intelligible subjective sound into targeted consciousness. Voice to skull. Oh, and who's the original assignee?
The United States Air Force. And so would the USDP government use such patent?
@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK
They Already Had A.I. Prove me wrong. https://t.co/4VctKeBPJe
Video Transcript AI Summary
"AI was not invented. It was resurrected." "The timeline proves this, where in 1943 the paper was written explaining AI to a t without having any computer science background at all, where their paper comes thirteen years before neural networks became usable in computing." "Sage system took in real time radar data from over a 100 radar stations across North America, analyzed it with massive central computers, made automated decisions about whether a target was friendly or hostile and gave suggested responses." "Sage also network across multiple regions connected by long range telephone data lines, or the Internet." "Sage Systems online with screen interaction." "The official narrative says nothing about this." "RAND was invested in predictive modeling, logic networks, and game theory." "Sage had Internet. They had AI. They had iPads." "Patents are admission points to the public eye."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have we just found exactly how AI was given back to us, back engineered, and brought back into the public's view? We all understand at this point that the timeline, the one that we are currently living in, it had a reset. Something massive happened. Where technology begins flying back at us starting around 1800. Everything from the car, the plane, the train, the phone, the TV, the light bulb, and power tools, you name it, where we are told that nothing happened before this.
For millions of years, Yet the buildings, the structures, they tell us a much different story of an advanced previous civilization here before all of us, before a worldwide massive reset. And what happened in the nineteen twenties was the beginning of our timeline, finding artificial intelligence and welcoming it back into the world, where we have seen that in the early nineteen hundreds, they begin excavations in Egypt underneath the Sphinx. Yet we are all told and have shown that Zahi Hawas and the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities repeatedly state that there is nothing beneath the Sphinx. No chambers, no tunnels, and we have shown that the Serapium Of Saqqara hold massive tombs built for giants. Yet we are all told that it was just for bulls, and there were never any bull skeletons found.
All of the tombs were empty and opened, telling us that they never found advanced technology at the site. Just a bunch of sand and sticks. The problem with all of this is that we have shown that the pyramids under radar scanning show that there is so much more underneath them. We saw that in 1991, seismic scans were conducted, revealing rectangular cavities beneath the sphinx's front paws and along its sides. They were not natural.
Yet Zahi Hawass lies constantly and denies it all. We've covered this guy. He is not to be trusted at this point in time. So why say they found nothing when it's so obvious that they did? Why lie to us?
They did find something, and it wasn't just pottery. Where we are told they were actually finding hieroglyphs resembling circuitry and unknown symbols with artifacts vanishing into private collections shipped to Europe and The US without public records. 1933, the secrecy begins, banning foreign led excavations, restricting access, finding old world technology underground, where in 1945, World War two ends, which we've covered this timeline so many times. We all know about these years where the intelligence agencies were all born. All over the world, including the five eyes.
Massive scientific discoveries flying at Us. Germany was absorbed by The USA. Operation Paperclip, where over 1,600 German scientists, engineers, and technicians were all brought to The US to run these intelligence agencies, including NASA. The Rand Corporation was fully operational in the nineteen fifties where they referenced subterranean vaults in Japan that were similar to those in Giza. And then what do you know?
1956, here comes AI. The birth of artificial intelligence 1956, a Dartmouth conference, where we see that Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts, they already published papers thirteen years prior describing neural networks using binary logic, where their work was resembling something already known, something they found, not something they just imagined. 1943, these two published a groundbreaking paper titled a logical calculus of the ideas imminent in the nervous activity. This paper predicted the structure of artificial neural networks. This is decades before computing could even handle them.
The paper used binary logic gates or zeros and ones, threshold activation, network structures. We're all told that there was no technology available to something they had access to. There was nothing to base this information off of. Yet they just imagined it out of thin air all before the first digital computers were even working. I don't believe it came from their imagination at all.
I believe it came from memory, from something that was found. You have to ask, how did two guys in 1943 just randomly lay out perfectly structured, precise layered nodes, the tree of life? Interconnected energetic functions, system modular with interconnected forces like logic gates or computational nodes. This is crucial for AI and supercomputers. Binary logic or dualism and hermetic thought structures that run like flowcharts.
It's exactly how an AI can continue to learn, continue to make new decisions. This is not something that two guys just came up with, especially when neither of these guys were even computer scientists. We are just getting started today. Welcome to episode 139 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day.
And if you're new, welcome. Are you a yo yo dieter? You diet, lose weight, but gain it all back, plus a few extra pounds. Then later, you lose it and regain it again and again. It's dangerous.
Studies show that can increase your risk of heart attack, stroke, type two diabetes, and other health problems. Breaking free of your yo yo diet pattern is a main reason. Doctors created Lean. Lean is a supplement, not an injection, and you don't need a prescription. The science behind Lean is impressive.
It's studied. Natural ingredients target weight loss in three powerful ways. Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar. It helps control appetite and cravings, and it helps burn fat by converting fat into energy. Listen.
If you're tired of losing weight and gaining it back, if you wanna lose meaningful weight at a healthy pace, Lean was created for you. Let's get you started with 20% off when you enter MLB 20 at takelean.com. That's code MLB 20 at takelean.com, and get started today.
Speaker 1: I wanna thank all of our sponsors over on Patreon. Thank you to flatearthdave.com. You can check out his app, the flat earth sun, moon, and zodiac app. I'll put the link right in the description, and you can use my referral code MLB. If you click the Tartaria button, you'll see the my lunch break playlist right here.
The app is awesome. Thank you to Rebecca Kay, David and Sherry Ferguson, Chuck Templeton, Joy Lee, Stephanie Nolan, the Burlesons, Edwin Rice, Charles Krueger, Dan Woodall, Dale, DJ Click Track, Jacob Law, Jim Ribley, and Christine Duggan, Kyle Glascock, pktfnews.org, Ben Drizano, Natalie Shippenoff, Melissa Edgar, Biggles, Clayton Lamar, Wiltask Homestead, John Adams, Robert Sozolins, Attila Power, Forbidden Gecko Love, Justin Grobner Grubb, Leah Strong, Dakota Dunn, Jason Hockburn, Marie c, Michael Dingyu, Patriot Armory, Tom O'Hara, c three s c o b, Jeffrey Temple, sonyadane.com, James Alvin, Buck Sui, Jason Press, Suki Warrior, We The People, Migs, Mark Chapman, Muji and Declan, Ariana Oates, Nathan Berbaugh, Ski, Beacon of Truth, Liberty's Arborist, Thomas Thorpe Peterson, Singer Coffee and Tea, Evelyn McGregor
Speaker 0: 43, DOL, Doc Halo, Kenneth Putt, Brenna Fernandez, Paraduction, and EchroDemonics, A and W Kerrigan, Tim Skin, Rod Wah, Quidest of Peas, Corbin Mechanical, Buck, VKH Bonner, Breaking Bigfoot, Road Warrior, Bruce Latour, Codren, David and Irene, Al Pizano, Ivan Apocaly, Ardra Rogers, Brazawea, Armin Walker, Ivan Apocaly, Kinda Classy, Kinda Chola, Maybell, Winnie Set a Compass Upon the Face of the Death, Laurel L. Burnett, Poppy Johns, Summer Chambers, Dee Woods, John and Carlo, Bill, Vince Moreno, Flat Earth Erbs, The Lady Lacey Show, Sven Eric, Jux, MDF, TFE, Annika Joyce,
Speaker 1: The Arnold's, Henry's mom, Gabriel Spark,
Speaker 0: The Home Wall, Pat Renard, Leonardo Links, Suze KC, Bradford's Donkey Wagon Deluxe, Ernie Ho,
Speaker 1: Usi, Tibba Shaba in the darkness. You guys
Speaker 0: are all awesome and help in this channel out a Nineteen forty three, McCulloch and Pitts write this paper explaining AI to a t without having any computer science background at all, where their paper comes thirteen years before neural networks became usable in computing. They described nonlinear, recursive systems using symbolic logic, using old world systems. So if they didn't make it up out of thin air, where did these two get the old world technology from? Pitts and McCulloch worked directly under Norbert Wiener at MIT, the founder of cybernetics and heavily involved in top secret wartime projects with deep connections to DARPA's forerunner, office of scientific research and development, the Manhattan Project Circle, and early corporation contacts. Having no computers, not one, zero to even test this idea, McCulloch and Pitts described how binary logic and threshold activation could mimic brain function.
And then just thirteen years later, we are all given the name artificial intelligence. And two years after that, 1958, MITRE was founded as a spin off of MIT's Lincoln Laboratory to manage the Sage air defense system, a massive real time computing network using automated decision making in just two years. From creating the name artificial intelligence, they just had this real time computing network that used radar data, logic gates, and automated decision making just all ready to go. Are you sure? Or was this the first time that AI was finally reintroduced to the world?
The timeline of it all is just way too fast and all over the place, creating the theory with no computers to even test it on. And they didn't even have any background in this field. Yet, Mitri shows up, and they have this air defense system just making automated decisions. Just two years after the name AI was introduced to the world. Let's keep going.
I believe in my opinion that AI was not invented. It was resurrected. And the timeline proves this, where in 1943 the paper was written explaining how AI functions. 1956, the Dartmouth Conference happened, coining the term Artificial Intelligence. Two years later, 1958, MITRE was launched, using AI in real time military systems.
Where the weirdest part comes next. Twenty two years later, Japan. AI is finally patent. Forty years after McCulloch and Pitts's paper. When we already know that AI was being used in the US government way before this, we just showed this, we now understand that old world technology is being used before it's patented in public knowledge.
I believe that patents are admission points to the public eye. Sage, operational in the nineteen fifties, the AI system that the US government was running. Well before it was ever patented and also before the term artificial intelligence was coined in 1956. This Sage system took in real time radar data from over a 100 radar stations across North America, analyzed it with massive central computers, made automated decisions about whether a target was friendly or hostile and gave suggested responses. It thought for itself on whether they should send a missile, a jet, or scramble defense.
It had touch screens, like iPads, for interaction. Well, we are now proving yet another technology was given back to us, and E. A. Johnson didn't invent it at all in 1965. We are showing that they have all of this, and they choose who is going to publicly give it back to us.
It is incredible. Factual evidence that these supposed creators of technology, they didn't create anything at all. They were shown the old world technology, and then they were chosen to be the official narrative's supposed guy pinned as the creator. It is a systematic lie, and we have just exposed this, where Sage also network across multiple regions connected by long range telephone data lines, or the Internet. This is the nineteen fifties where we are all told that the Internet was invented in 1969, where the first message was supposed to be sent between UCLA and Stanford on 10/29/1969.
This is a bunch of lies that are now exposed. Sage had Internet. They had AI. They had iPads. They had all of it, and I'm sure so much more.
And having all of it before the stupid stories that were told, all of it was found, and it is placed back into the world through lies, fake creators, and fake timelines, and lies about the discoveries telling us that they never found anything at these sites in the early nineteen twenties when it couldn't be further from the truth. Let's take a minute and thank all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber. I appreciate all of you. And thank you for liking the episodes. You are all incredible and help share this information with brand new people every single day.
We are on YouTube. We're on Rumble x, Instagram, TikTok, and Spotify if you're looking for even more content from us. You're already drinking coffee. Other than giving you a caffeine spike, is it doing anything for you? Rejuvenate coffee is different.
It's science backed, Clean Arabica coffee infused with CAAKG, a powerful compound, studied for its ability to support longevity, cellular energy, and metabolism at the deepest level. That means sharper mornings, no crash, focus, and long term benefits that your body will thank you for. I drink it because I care about my health, my energy, and how I show up for my family, for my work, and for the life that I wanna build. If you're gonna drink coffee anyway, make it one that works as hard as you do. Head to seventeen seventy five coffee dot com slash lunch break and try Rejuvenate Coffee right now.
Don't just wake up, Rejuvenate. Let's stick the dagger in this narrative. The Sage system, which was built by Mitri, was using MIT's technology, we are told. And yet we don't officially know how long AI and all of this has been known about. It could be much earlier than this, but this officially predates the official narrative without a doubt.
We are told that it was the most advanced computing system network of its time. An AI decision making system, touch screen based interaction, interactive display screens controlled by a light gun, Internet, using this technology nearly two decades before the public was introduced to anything similar, where the timeline is clear and undeniable undeniable in my opinion. This is gonna change the world forever, and you're never gonna listen to those stupid stories again. 1951 to 1958, Rand, Mietri, and Sage were all operational using all of the technologies that we just mentioned, where the official narrative tells us, Internet doesn't exist. A lie.
1958, Maitrey was founded. Sage Systems online with screen interaction. The official narrative says nothing about this. Nineteen sixties, Rand, Mitri, and OSRD or the office of scientific research and development. Really quick, the OSRD was Rand.
It was Mietri. It was the NSA. It was all of it. And then after the World War two ended, OSRD branched off into all these divisions, all involved in secure network development, the Internet. But the world.
And then in the nineteen eighties, we all finally see the first patent for AI coming from Japan. When at this point, they were already using AI for decades, and I believe they have been using it a lot longer than 1943. When Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts finally published their paper in 1943, a logical calculus of the ideas imminent in nervous activity, the first public mathematical model of neural network predicting core AI architecture all before the first digital computer even existed in a usable form again. We just showed that they lie. We just showed that they have all of this technology.
We know that these two didn't just pull this technology out of a hat and write a perfect paper on it. That's illogical. We know that they had this technology. Because when they were using it militarily, there were never any flaws. It worked perfectly.
And we know that that's not how things work. We know that there's trial and error. And if you're truly developing something, things naturally progress. There are going to be flaws and then corrections. When Sage was using this technology in the nineteen fifties, this was done.
There was no trial and error after years and years of having it. Meaning, that they had this technology prior to that 1943 paper where SAGE, according to public records, costed the government approximately $10,000,000,000 in the nineteen fifties, which is over a $100,000,000,000 today, making it one of the most expensive defense systems ever built. Sage wasn't just for war. I believe without a doubt that it was a classified AI based military system project that nobody even knew existed until right now. An old world technology that was brought back into the world, found, rediscovered.
And once again, we have to ask, did it ever even leave in the first place, or has it always been here? And these are just branches of its capability. A computer system that is able to think, adjust, and make decisions in a second or less, constantly molding to improve and think for itself. What is AI? Where did it really come from, and how long has it really been here?
Something that we know has been operational since the nineteen fifties before the public even knew about it. And then we're lied to about the official release date, meaning we don't understand the true timeline of it, the progression of it. But what we do know now is that AI was never created when we were told that it was, and it was here all along for so many more years than what we were told, where Sage wasn't the only group using the AI in the nineteen fifties. RAND was invested in predictive modeling, logic networks, and game theory. MIT's Lincoln Lab, Hermitry was using neural network, lifelike simulations.
The CIA, NSA, and OSRD were all involved in top secret computing programs that have never been declassified. We know all about these groups and what they like to do, including the Bell Labs, where in the nineteen fifties, they were experimenting with speech recognition, pattern detection, and self adaptive systems, machine learning. And the one thing that all of these groups have in common, if you're living in The USA, they are all 100% funded by you. 100% funded by the public. They found the technology.
They lied about it, and we all wrote the checks because every single one of these groups are not only government funded, but also born out of war, secrecy, and post World War two black operations. And if we all think that AI is the best thing they got, I believe we should all reconsider our thought process right now.
@CultivateElevat - Matt From Cultivate Elevate
Meta glasses recording everything by Zuck? Might be time to bring back bullying.... what's your thoughts? 🤔 https://t.co/KlC1KoxCmN
Video Transcript AI Summary
Now I've heard they got meta glasses. They got glasses, which people are gonna walk around and record. If a person enters anybody's home with glasses which are recording the entire time, they're probably gonna have to beat them up. Meta Glasses sponsored by Ray Ban. Do you see how all these companies are in it together? They wanna sell their products and they wanna record you and put you into some George Orwell 1984 prison. Everybody's got cameras and they're all recording you with their ring doorbells and all this weird stuff. NPCs are aliens at this point. You gotta be an alien or an NPC. Buy all this technology and keep purchasing it and thinking that this is okay and chat GPT and this and smartwatches, and you're talking to your watch while you put your MetaGlasses and get your 55 boosters. Like, that's pretty much what it was.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I've heard they got meta glasses. They got meta glasses. Like, think about this. They got glasses, which people are gonna walk around and record people. I'm gonna have to see if we have to bring back bullying.
That's what we're gonna have to say. Because if a person enters anybody's home with glasses which are recording the entire time, I mean, they're probably probably gonna have to beat them up. Like, I I mean, I I just kinda that's kinda how I see it. This is crazy. I mean, between people's phones already, like, recording and doing all kinds of weird stuff and they're obsessed with recording themselves and whatever.
Now we got glasses. We got Meta Glasses sponsored by Ray Ban. Do you see how all these companies are in it together? They wanna sell their products and they wanna record you and put you into some George Orwell 1984 prison. And that's kinda where it comes down, where everybody's got cameras and they're all recording you with their ring doorbells and all this weird stuff.
Makes no sense. People can get a dog. Get a dog. A dog will tell you if somebody's outside. You can even get a cat.
You can get a cat. A cat will tell you if somebody's outside. So, you know, this is just people just people lost it. That's for sure. I think their NPCs are aliens at this point.
I think that's kinda my opinion on it. You gotta be an alien. You gotta be an alien or an NPC buy all this technology and keep purchasing it and accepting it and thinking that this is okay and chat GPT and this and smartwatches, and you're talking to your watch while you put your AirPods, and then you put your MetaGlasses and get your 55 boosters, you gotta be an alien. Like, that's that's pretty much what it was.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
An operating system has been installed inside billions of people https://t.co/3QxcKTBHg7
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
DARPA, Palantir, Boeing, foreign countries, even Google have programs and technology that can read & write, manipulate, induce, project, and affect things and people in ways you never thought to be possible. https://t.co/TQX3SdGdzp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion covers neuroscience as a potential weapon and the emerging technologies that enable reading from and writing to the brain. Key points include nanoparticulate aerosolizable nanomaterials that could disrupt blood flow or neural activity, and the use of nanomaterials to place electrodes in a head to create large arrays of implantable sensors and transmitters that can read from and write to the brain remotely, as in DARPA’s N3D program (next generation non-invasive neuromodulation).
Advances in artificial intelligence are enabling medical breakthroughs once thought impossible, including devices that can read minds and alter brains to treat conditions like anxiety and Alzheimer's. These developments raise privacy concerns, leading Colorado to pass a first-of-its-kind law to protect private thoughts. Ear pods can pick up brainwave activity and indicate whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, and there is debate about whether one can know what they are paying attention to.
It is claimed that brain-reading technologies are accessible to the public and that technologies from companies like Elon Musk, Apple, Meta, and OpenAI can change, enhance, and control thoughts, emotions, and memories. Brain waves can be decoded to identify specific words or thoughts, and brain signals are described as encrypted, with AI able to identify frequencies for specific words. Data from brain activity is described as extremely sensitive, with concerns about data insurance discrimination, law enforcement interrogation, and advertiser manipulation, and with governments potentially altering thoughts, emotions, and memories as technology advances.
Private companies collecting brain data are said to be largely unregulated about storage, access, duration, and breach responses, with two-thirds reportedly sharing or selling data with third parties. This context motivated Pazowski of the Neuro Rights Foundation to help pass Colorado’s privacy act inclusion of biological or brain data as identifiable information, akin to fingerprints. While medical facilities are regulated, private firms may not be, prompting calls for stronger privacy protections.
There is evidence that devices have controlled or influenced the thoughts of mice in labs, and questions arise about whether at-home devices could influence human thoughts or attention. The discussion also notes the potential for brainwave-based attention monitoring in workplaces (early mentions of “bossware”) and the possibility that attention discrimination could extend to differentiating tasks like programming versus writing or browsing.
There is skepticism about whether all passwords could be cracked by brain or quantum computing, and concerns about security risks: devices often communicate over Bluetooth, which is not highly secure, and some technologies attempt to write signals to the brain, raising fears about hacking. Experts emphasize the need to address these issues proactively given rapid progress and substantial investment, including a claim of one billion dollars per year spent by China on neurotech research for military purposes.
The conversation touches on the potential use of AI voice in the head to reduce the ego and control individuals, and on cases where individuals report hearing voices or “demons” in their heads, linking to broader concerns about manipulation, “Manchurian candidates,” and covert weapons. Public figures discuss investigations, classified information, and the possibility that information about these weapons might be suppressed or tightly controlled, with ongoing debates about how to anticipate and counter these developments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is why it becomes so important to understand the novelty and the viability of neuroscience as being leveraged as weapons. We then have the use of nanoparticulate agents, aerosolizable nanomaterials that can be breathed in and disrupt blood flow or neurological network activity, activity that can be used as an enclosed weapon or perhaps that can be used as a more broad weapon of disruption and or destruction. We also have the capability to utilize nanomaterials to get electrodes into a head and to create a vast array of viable sensors and transmitters. This is DARPA's N3D program, next generation non invasive neuromodulation, utilizing these techniques and technologies to create vast arrays of implantable electrodes that need not be put into the brain surgically that are then able to read from the brain and write into the brain remotely in real time.
Speaker 1: Advances in artificial intelligence are leading to medical breakthroughs once thought impossible, including devices that can actually read minds and alter our brains to help treat conditions like anxiety, Alzheimer's.
Speaker 2: But that technology raises privacy concerns. That's why Colorado passed a first of its kind law aimed at ensuring our private thoughts remain private. Our ear pods that can pick up brainwave activity and tell whether or not a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering. Okay. Well, you might think, fine.
But even if we can tell whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, you can't tell what they're paying attention to. You would be wrong.
Speaker 1: Who has access to this technology?
Speaker 3: You know, Karen, everyone, believe it or not. You can buy devices on the Internet right now that can, to varying degrees, de code your brain waves. And the technology being developed by the likes of Elon Musk, Apple, Meta, and OpenAI can change, enhance, and control your thoughts, emotions, even your memories. It's the dawn of a new era filled with promise and peril. If the at home devices are impressive, those being used in the lab are even more so.
Our brain waves are like encrypted signals and using artificial intelligence, researchers have cracked the code, identifying frequencies for specific words to turn thought to text. That I just think it and AI knows what I'm thinking because of the pattern of my brain wave. But with the benefits come risks.
Speaker 4: It is some of the most sensitive data that you could possibly share with anyone.
Speaker 3: Data insurance companies could use to discriminate, law enforcement to interrogate, and advertisers to manipulate. Government too could get into our heads and potentially alter our thoughts, emotions, and memories as the technology advances.
Speaker 4: Nobody wants to live in a world where some of these misuses or abuses exist.
Speaker 3: While medical research facilities are subject to privacy laws, private companies that are amassing large caches of brain data are not. And based on a study by the Neuro Rights Foundation, two thirds of them are already sharing or selling the data with third parties. The vast majority of them also don't disclose where the data is stored, how long they keep it, who has access to it, and what happens if there's a security breach. Which is why Pazowski, medical director of the foundation, led the passage of a first in the nation law in Colorado that includes biological or brain data in the state privacy act, similar to fingerprints if the data is being used to identify people.
Speaker 4: This is a first step, but we still have a long way to go.
Speaker 3: And with companies and countries racing to access, analyze and alter our brains, Pazowski says privacy protections should be a no brainer.
Speaker 4: It's everything that we are. You know, it's everything about our thoughts, our emotions, our memories, our intentions.
Speaker 2: And Sean, we're also wondering, can any of these devices actually control a person's thoughts?
Speaker 3: They have been used to control the thoughts of mice in a lab.
Speaker 1: All right, so much to take in. Sean, thank you for that report.
Speaker 5: What
Speaker 2: do you think? Is it a future you're ready for? You may be surprised to learn that it's a future that has already arrived. Everything in that video that you just saw is based on technology that is already here today. Artificial intelligence has enabled advances in decoding brain activity in ways that we never before thought possible.
Sensors that can pick up your brainwave activity, earbuds, headphones, tiny tattoos that you can wear behind your ear. We can pick up emotional states like, you happy or sad or angry? We can pick up and decode faces that you're seeing in your mind. Simple shapes, numbers, your pin number to your bank account. It's not just your brain activity here that we can pick up.
We can also pick up your brain activity in different places, like as your neurons fire from your brain down your arm and send signals to your hand to tell you how to type, move. All of that could be decoded through electromyography, and that's what you're seeing here is a device now in the form of a simple wearable watch that can pick up that activity. And one of the pivotal acquisitions of the field, Meta acquired this company, Control Labs, in 2019 because major tech companies are investing and helping to make these devices universally applicable as the way in which we interact with the rest of our technology? What if everywhere has ubiquitous monitoring? In fact, during the pandemic, what we found was that 80% of companies admitted that they use at least some forms of so called bossware technology to monitor the productivity of their employees, whether it's a white collar employee monitoring what's on their screen, or in any other context, surveillance is part of our everyday lives.
Surveillance for productivity is part of what has become the norm in the workplace, and maybe with good reason. Nine out of 10 employees waste time during the workday. They focus on other things. There may be good reasons why we want to be able to find better ways to monitor whether somebody is paying attention or they're doing something different. The newest way to monitor attention is through a device like this one.
These are EarPods that are launching later this year. These EarPods, much like the video you watched earlier, are EarPods that can pick up brainwave activity and tell whether or not a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering. Okay. Well, you might think, fine, but even if we can tell whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, you can't tell what they're paying attention to. You would be wrong.
Turns out that you can not only tell whether whether a person is paying attention or their mind is wandering, but you can discriminate between the kinds of things that they're paying attention to. Whether they're doing something like central tasks, like programming, peripheral tasks, like writing documentation, or unrelated tasks, like surfing social media or online browsing. When you combine brainwave activity together with other forms of software and surveillance technology, the power becomes quite precise. So what do we do with this? What do we do with technology that enables us to monitor brainwave activity for attention?
Do we embrace it? Do we resist it? If you've heard of Havana syndrome, Havana syndrome is a belief that people have suffered from the leading theory is that it's targeted microwave activity of brains to disrupt brainwave activity. There's no proof of it yet.
Speaker 5: I had a hearing this week in homeland security, and this this hasn't even become very mainstream yet, but it was about, different foreign adversaries using direct weapons, direct energy weapons against US citizens. They completely incapacitate citizens of The United States. You guys might have heard of it called Havana syndrome. And then we went down to the skiff, and we got a classified briefing from some of the people on the on the panel, and it was one of the most I'm a former Navy SEAL, so I've traveled around the world and hunted bad guys for a long time. But I can tell you this, when I went down to that skiff, it was one of the most terrifying briefs that I've ever been a part of.
Okay? This is how brazen our enemies are becoming because of how foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and I would act act actually say wicked we have become.
Speaker 2: But there's at least a couple dozen cases where there isn't a good explanation for why the individual suffered from disruption of mental abilities. And there's certainly a lot of investment in trying to figure out whether you could target the brain remotely. It's much more difficult to figure out how you could read the brain remotely.
Speaker 6: Let's get to that, because I think it's one of the most important and crucial questions about how this develops. And by the way, raise your hands. I'm just going to ask this question and then we'll move to the audience. You talked at the end. In the beginning you said you won't be able to read complex thoughts.
It seems as though we can understand emotions. There's some way you can recreate some images inside your head.
Speaker 2: Already, gamers have figured out, for example, while a person is wearing a headset, how to, you know, prime a person through their brainwave activity to be able to decode their PIN number and their home address. So you don't have to have your full complex thought decoded to reveal your thoughts, right? It just, it gets at what we think thought is.
Speaker 6: And how do you decode somebody's pin number? You flash a series of numbers and see how their brain reacts to them?
Speaker 2: So, you have recognition memory signals that are preconscious and subconscious, and this is part of why it's been used, for example, by governments to interrogate criminals. Do you recognize this potential co conspirator? Do you recognize, you know, this murder weapon? Those preconscious signals, like what we call the P300 wave or the N400 wave, these are before you even consciously process information. So, you could prime it with a number and then see if a person recognizes it.
And you can do it without them realizing that that's what you're doing.
Speaker 6: So will all of our passwords be cracked first by this or quantum computing?
Speaker 7: Hard to tell. Alright.
Speaker 8: There's a whole set of things around hacking and bad actors. So, for example if you have some headset and it communicates over Bluetooth Bluetooth is just not that secure. Most of these things are kind of read and not write. But there are technologies like TMS that do try to write signals to the brain. And I'm sure people are going to try to do that for various reasons.
Imagine those systems being hacked. So we really want to think this through. We want to get a jump on it. I think that's needed fundamental point. I completely agree with it.
No matter how long the time scales are on some of the specifics we need to get on it.
Speaker 9: I do fall on the side of this is moving faster rather than slower. You know I'm working with one of the world's experts on neurotech Rafael Ustad who says that things that he thought would take five years are now taking one or two. So I think we're moving faster. And also because a billion dollars a year is being spent just by China alone through its military and researching neurotech. And I'm quite confident that they're working on, even though they have no personal knowledge, decoding human thoughts, potentially using these devices for torture and other kinds of things.
Speaker 10: Use this artificial intelligence voice in the head to break down the ego and control an individual.
Speaker 11: Ultimately, yes. You can't plug your eardrums. You can't stop the sound. A lot of the targets are tricked into believing evil aliens have abducted their brains, demons. They're tricked.
Yes.
Speaker 10: How are they tricked?
Speaker 11: They're told. By who? By the voices. A lot of these school shootings, I think, that you hear about on the news, they hear voices.
Speaker 8: And we've learned that Cruz told the BSO detective that he heard a demon in his head.
Speaker 10: And police now say he also heard voices.
Speaker 12: Who heard voices in his head.
Speaker 11: The scripts they're called. And they're meant to confuse the very derogatory. That's just typical breakdown. And why would you wanna break down the ego of that person to rebuild it? So this gets into creating Manchurian candidates.
Speaker 3: Police have released video made by the man who opened fire at Florida State University
Speaker 11: in Project Soul Catcher. Referred to a Myron May as a Myron May, right? As a psychobomb. They didn't care who the target was. They were just trying to make him explode and do something bad.
He was a lawyer trained there. His reasoning why he shot up the school was he needed news publicity to make sure people understood this was real, and he left the video testimony.
Speaker 5: As sick as this may sound, I've even had stalkers following me into church.
Speaker 10: He believed government stalkers were harassing him and using a direct energy weapon to hurt him.
Speaker 11: But he gave out, seven packages in the mail, and the FBI intercepted them all. What were in these packages? Just information. Just information.
Speaker 3: May then opened fire at an FSU library, wounding three people. He was killed in a shootout with police.
Speaker 10: If these people do explode and do something bad like this, there's absolutely no way to prove that there's been any sort of manipulation to the brain. In this guy's case, talked about it. I mean, obviously, he talked
Speaker 11: But it but it was covered up.
Speaker 10: He's the way they they way they write the article, he sounds like a crazy person.
Speaker 5: Guys, if your assessments here are correct, these are very covert weapons, aren't they?
Speaker 13: That's correct. There's no entry or exit wound. How they're designed is to make the target feel like they're crazy, like they're imagining things.
Speaker 5: And you guys also said that these attacks are happening right here in this city. Is that correct?
Speaker 12: Mean, there have been some that have gone public with respect to Washington DC.
Speaker 5: I think it was mister you mister Grosev said, you spoke to a Russian agent who said that they believe that Americans are using the same weapons on them. Is that correct?
Speaker 11: That is correct.
Speaker 5: Might that have something to do with part of the CIA's motive to cover up the existence of the this tech and these weapons?
Speaker 11: That is a very logical possibility.
Speaker 5: Thank you. Mister chairman, I yield back.
Speaker 12: Gentleman yields. Chair now recognize the gentleman from New York, mister Goldman, for his random questioning.
Speaker 14: Thank you, mister chairman, and thank you to our witnesses for being here. Mister Grozov, I wanna follow-up a little bit on the interactions you've had with Russian intelligence about these a AHIs. And mister Zaid, you I wanna ask, and this is a hypothetical, but I I'm trying to understand why our government would try to block information sharing or conceal information that they have. And one thing that comes to mind is whether there's an operational risk to revealing any of the of the details of their investigation. Is is that something that you have come across, in any of your work?
There's a lot
Speaker 12: of reasons why the information might not be publicly released. And I do think that's something we could address more in a classified environment to explain that, but there are understandable reasons why the US government, has not revealed much of what it knows.
Speaker 13: There's some long term things that needs to be done in terms of of new acts. But in the short term, we need to do things like implement the original Havana Act. DOD still hasn't done it.
Speaker 7: So this is not out of the realm of these very nefarious people like in the CIA and these other types of secret societies institutions of our government. We're now finding out the use of AI can be used against people. We've already heard from the World Economic Forum that they have ability with AI to be able to read people's thoughts by putting in a little Bluetooth in someone's ear that they can actually see what someone is actually thinking about as they're working. They're gonna sell it to us, Alison, as this is gonna be good for employment because employers will know whether or not their employees are daydreaming or thinking about other things other than the job. But what is it saying?
It is saying that they now possess the ability to read our thoughts and now weaponize us with acoustical types of things that can be sent to us that throws us off balance or makes us feel crazy. This is all, where is it going? All about controlling the narrative, controlling people.
Speaker 15: Absolutely. That is most certainly what it is all about as has been made rather clear over the past couple of years, But, yeah, I think this could obviously take an extremely dangerous turn here. Mean, wouldn't be surprised if this led to targeting and testing and even, like, torturing of innocent civilians, which brings me to my next thought is which is the inevitable threat of artificial intelligence mixing into all this. Right? Mix AI into the use of neuroweaponry and you get an entirely new uncharted territory.
Speaker 7: And the whole idea is that we would have these biological sensors in our bodies and then they could read our thoughts, know our emotions, know whether we're hungry or not, or anything like that. And so now it's a warfare of information. They will have everything on you. They will know we are coming and going. And so this kind of warfare, this kind of being able to target individuals and think about this, there is no way to detect.
There's no entry point. There's no exit point like a bullet would have. They could just target somebody and they're saying, you know, yeah, he went crazy. Yeah. I'm sorry.
We we you know, and then turn the kill switch on somebody and, you know, and then lose a thread. Now
@RedactedNews - Redacted
Intelligence agencies may already have the technology to control human thought using nanotechnology. @Mindnexuslive and @diedsuddenly_ join us with the evidence. This is not science fiction. This is happening now. https://t.co/3JKOfttXAm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Clayton welcomed Jesse Beltran, a TSCM-certified investigator, and Edward Zahl, a producer of Died Suddenly, back to discuss new findings about nanotechnology in vaccines and alleged “synthetic telepathy” used by intelligence agencies. Beltran explained that an MI6 asset, Oxford-educated with chemistry background, disclosed that Havana syndrome-related communications could be a form of synthetic telepathy used by MI6 and Five Eyes nations to exchange orders discreetly, especially when frontal surveillance is possible. The asset described being head of operations on assignments in the Middle East and Somalia, and he said the system could serve as a plausible-deniability method of communication and as a multifaceted torture device if agents misbehave. He is currently involved in a UK lawsuit seeking damages and removal from the program.
Edward noted that the claim sounds fantastical but argued this technology represents a realized goal from Project Artichoke and related efforts; he said the technology enables remote mind influence and that democracy and individual autonomy could be endangered if leaders tolerate such capabilities. He emphasized that the technology is reportedly used not only by MI6 but by every Five Eyes nation, and discussed potential uses in elections or military actions to influence populations. He described the broader consequences as a threat to cognitive freedom and societal structure.
Beltran then described the mechanism behind the nanotech, stating that graphene oxide and silicon act as miniaturized amplifiers or antennas. He referenced a 1 cc syringe with trillions of nanorobots, citing Dr. Ittle Bachelet’s demonstrations and a prior study by Dr. Robert Young showing graphene oxide in vaccines and derivatives. Beltran connected silicon detection with harmonic signatures and said that a terahertz graphene-on-stack patch antenna article about future 6G communications demonstrates how such systems could operate at tiny scales, enabling deep penetration and communication with implants. He claimed the nanotech is now widespread, even in the environment—found in foundations of grasses, trees, air, and foods—making everyone a potential node in an integrated Internet of Things and a form of synthetic biology in human form.
The discussion turned to Havana syndrome’s similarities: aftereffects such as cognitive struggles and strained relationships, with some victims reporting that the mind has been tampered with or manipulated. Beltran cited Aaron Alexis, a US soldier who contacted him about symptoms and later carried out the Navy Yard shooting, noting the presence of “ELF” (extremely low frequency) markings. Edward described the ongoing unauthorized experiments on US citizens as a priority for congressional inquiry, mentioning a Florida congresswoman, Luna, who chairs a task force on declassification and recommended hearings on MKUltra follow-ups.
Jesse explained that graphene oxide functions as an RF amplifier, with experiments in the UK showing changes in silicon indicators and reductions in nanotech presence after targeted interventions. He cited the transition to 6G and President’s remarks about deeper skin penetration, arguing the importance of removing amplifiers like graphene oxide from the body to mitigate manipulation. Edward closed by asserting the sovereignty of the brain and soul and urged urgent action, noting that Died Suddenly (diedsuddenly.info) would cover further developments. They planned to release Died Suddenly 2 and provided a link for viewers seeking further information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, what you're about to hear could really be humanity changing information. Intelligence agencies using nanoparticles found in vaccines as a mechanism for telepathy amongst themselves. Think of it as part of this Havana syndrome story. Could it be part of the COVID shot technology that's now been confirmed by MI six whistleblowers that this is actually happening? It's actually really remarkable.
It sounds like something out of science fiction, but now it's been confirmed. And by our next guests who, are part of the team who brought us the documentary Died Suddenly, Jesse Beltran is a TSCM certified investigator. Edward Zahl is a producer behind Died Suddenly, and what they've just uncovered is really remarkable. So gentlemen, we wanted to welcome you back to the show. The first time we had you on our show, we were, of course, talking about the nanotech particles.
We were talking about the COVID shot as really inside the human body as a transmitter. That video that interview has been viewed millions of times now around the world. And as a as a result of that interview, whistleblower started coming forward and revealing more information about this program. So gentlemen, welcome back to the show. Great to see you.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having us.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Clayton. Yes.
Speaker 0: So Jesse, maybe you could just kind of take it and since we last spoke, what have you uncovered? And what did you get on film as you've been traveling the world and speaking with these whistleblowers?
Speaker 2: Yeah, well, thanks to show. Worldwide, we have had people with pedigree reaching out and asking to speak with me to see if I can help them with trials and so forth. But what was more remarkable is that we had a MI6 asset reach out and said that he would like to speak with me to disclose this specific topic. And when I spoke to him, I was very skeptical. Because it just sounded so fantastical.
And why would someone, basically, at the CIA level in The Americas, want to come forward and tell us about what he knows. And his story goes as this: He's Oxford educated, background in chemistry, and he showed us all of the documentation to verify that he has been on assignments in The Middle East. He's been on assignments in Somalia. He was the head of operations. And what he disclosed to us is that this phenomenon, the Havana syndrome, AHI remember, in our last show, we talked about the agents, CIA agents, FBI agents talking about hearing these auditory symptoms and our diplomats and some congressional members.
What he disclosed that this is a communication system that not only am I six assets and agents are asked by their superiors to take on. And he says it's a form of synthetic telepathy is how their communication instead of using traditional Dropboxes, or digital assets or other ways and forms of communications. He says, this was the preferred method. And the reason he said that was preferred method because if they were in front of an adversary, or they were being surveilled, that this would be a very, very discreet plausible deniability way of communicating and give exchanging information getting orders and what are they to do next. What he also disclosed is that if an agent does not follow orders, or falls out of line, that it is a multifaceted system, and then becomes a torture device.
And this is what happened to him. And he demanded with his superiors at a certain point in this experience that they stop the communication request to no longer be an asset for MI6. And he went to parliament, and he actually current has currently has a lawsuit in The UK specifically about what had happened to him and his experience.
Speaker 0: So this is Edward, this is on the court documents, His his lawsuit against MI six, he was a part of this program and basically being asked to be removed from this program?
Speaker 1: Yes. And also trying to get damages and and kind of compensation for what this program did to him. Now what Jesse's describing, it sounds fantastical. It sounds like science fiction. But the truth is, Clayton, we're not in World War two anymore.
We're not in the nineteen forties. This kind of technology is Jesse has has noted on on many interviews and in a lot of the the coursework that he is is has been studying and and producing in most of his life. We go back to project artichoke. In the fifties and sixties, this was a dream. This was a mission.
This was a goal. Well, it's 2026, and that goal has been realized. And the goal simply, again, is that we we have a version of synthetic telepathy. And I think it's less more be about the communication. Communication is already pretty pretty, you know, foundational.
But the fact that the government can remotely torture someone, and this is the story that we talked about with Havana syndrome victims. It's not just government, workers or CIA or state department officials. This is happening to regular people, people that are being targeted for for various reasons. And what was described to us was wasn't unique to just MI six. The way it was described to us is that every Five Eyes nation is not only using this, but actively trying to find new inventive ways, to deploy it such as what if you could convince people of a certain political ideology or or religion or or maybe of a of certain a certain task by by talking to them like you're the the voice of God.
And this was the case with right the way he he described this, the man we spoke to in England. It was something he couldn't stop. It could feel like a distant conversation, a constant voice in your head. Maybe some would misidentify it as God or misidentify it as their internal conscience. But in in the case of this, what if it's used in an election?
What if it's used, while we're bombing Iran? We're telling the people in the country, surrender, surrender, your officials are all dead. I mean, the the capabilities are are literally only limited by our imagination, but the impact is real. And, Clayton, I think for for democracies, for an American constitutional republic, how can something like that survive if the government and, shadowy officials are able to literally manipulate the mind with no fingerprint left behind after?
Speaker 0: Well, I've spoken to CIA whistleblowers, Jesse, who told me that the ultimate goal of the CIA, like if they could list their goals, to understand your thoughts, to control your thoughts is at the top of that list. And so this is like the ultimate weapon in being able to control and manipulate your thoughts. They've they've really, in many ways achieve this. No.
Speaker 2: Absolutely. And here's the profound aspect of this. The last frontier is the human mind. Once you conquer the human mind, then you have absolute control. And part of Project Artichoke, not only were they looking for ways to erase memory sets, imprint memory sets, were using drug therapies, electric shock therapies, were using forms of hypnosis.
And my background in this journey and I became a master hypnotist for that specific reason, because in order to understand your enemy, you have to understand how they think and why they do the behaviors or processes that they do. Now, think about this. If you can manipulate memory sets in the human mind, and no one would ever be able to tell the difference between their own natural accrued memories and experiences versus something that has been synthetically induced upon you. What does that mean for society? What we are facing is complete slavery, complete communism in a way we've never fathom or imagined in the human experience.
I don't think our forefathers ever even thought that this would even be possible. And that's where we're at.
Speaker 0: You know, losing weight is not just about eating less and working out. It's about changing how your body and brain respond to food. This is why the wellness company created the unique tirzepatide b six and b twelve combo. Clinically shown to outperform semiglutatide by targeting the GLP one and GIP receptors needle free. No more injections.
So a daily weight support solution designed to work with your body's natural regulatory systems. Tirzepatide helps influence the signals that actually control your appetite, your satiation, your metabolic optimization. And research shows that it can actually reduce cravings, lower the desire to overeat, and even challenge how the brain responds to bad fats and higher sug sugar foods. So weight challenges are not simply about willpower. They are about biology.
Instead of weekly injections, this formula is a three month supply of fast absorbing sublingual tablets placed directly under your tongue. Because energy matters during your weight loss journey, the tabs actually contain highly absorbable vitamins, b six, b twelve, to help support cellular energy production. This is not about extreme restrictions. It's about restoring the gut and brain relationship through balance and building healthier habits that last. So head over to twc.health/redacted and use the code redacted to get $34 off plus free shipping for USA residents only.
Again, twc.health/redacted. Can you guys talk about the mechanism of how this works? So this whistleblower explains that this is part of a system. So are they injected with these nanoparticles as part of I mean, we've you know, we're talking before about the COVID shot and what it was doing to the bodies in the ground. I I encourage all of our viewers to go back and watch that interview that we did before because even six feet under the ground as as COVID victims were in the ground in caskets, they were still sending off this signal.
Their bodies were still emitting this, like, Bluetooth signal. So maybe you can just walk us through like the mechanics of how these agents are injected with it, given this, and then manipulated by it.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I I can actually answer that. So when we interviewed him, he talked about an earlier technology that was instituted on him. He had a dental implant. It was a the older tech and I said, well, is it transmitting now?
Why didn't you have it removed? And the reason you didn't have it removed because he's working towards this lawsuit issue and looking for damages. But it was an amplifier type technology. So you send a radio frequency to it, and it would amplify what was being transmitted. Now, when we look at the nanotech, and you know, we talked about what Doctor.
Ittle Bachelet demonstrated in a one cc syringe, there was really a trillion tiny robots in it that he had just brought from his lab. In it is in this technology in order to make it work is graphene oxide and silicon, materials. And we know this based on a study that was done in two years prior to anyone else by Doctor. Robert Young. He had a published study and I can share that with you so you can disseminate it.
And on page six, eight and twelve of it, not only does he Doctor. Young already had discovered that this graphene oxide was part of this process long before anyone else, long before anyone else started studying the vaccines or what was in them. But he also discovered and because of our work and our human subject trial study that we just did in The UK, when we told him what our equipment was detecting for, looking for harmonic signatures for silicon, He said, did you know, and I didn't think about this because I thought it was insignificant, is that when I did my study, we were discovering silicon also as an aspect that was in the derivatives. And when I went back and looked at a study and I said, he's absolutely right. And so this also gave more emphasis as to why the results that we were achieving in The UK were happening.
But just think about it this way. We are learning to miniaturize everything in life these days. And what the graphene oxide and the silicon based materials are, are just amplifiers, they're miniature antennas. And there is a article that was published in scientific reports, and it's a terahertz graphene on the stack patch antenna for the future of six gs communications. And in that article, it talks about how this system will communicate in the terahertz range to minute miniaturized implants.
Okay, and this is what he's describing and this is what he's talking about. And unfortunately, he says, during that pandemic year, he was part of given an assignment and to understand this process a little bit more intensely. And he says, unfortunately, this has now been disseminated globally. It's now in our ecosystem. He's talking about this nanotech is in our foundation of our grasses, trees, our air.
It's in our foods. It's everywhere. And this is why we know and I've been following you Clayton very closely and you've been right on target with this topic. Every single human being out there is now a note. If you have this in you, you are part of the integrated Internet of Things.
We are now synthetic biology in human form.
Speaker 0: And so Edward, we're all we're all part of this node and this six g is just part of it. We're all being interconnected and controlled. I mean, we talk about, like, people hearing voices in their heads. You know, I've I was speaking to a source the other day. I cannot reveal this person, and this person has not come forward.
But talking about, you know, you know, being in Kandahar, being in Afghanistan, witnessing, of course, all of the things that were happening with the CIA. And, you know, for these individuals who were hearing voices in their head later who were sort of CIA adjacent and all of this stuff. It's not it's not like PTSD. Right? This is not just like, you know, you think you're going crazy.
Like, is all intentional.
Speaker 2: Yes. But it does cause PTSD.
Speaker 1: Well, it causes PTSD as Jesse just noted. The gaslighting aspect is really need it needs to be rethought across society because how easy it is for people just to believe someone's gone crazy. They've gone insane. Right. To say something that's shocking to the status quo, very easy to dismiss them as credible, very easy to institutionalize them or, God forbid, put them on, the latest SSRI or or or, you know, venturous drug from pharmaceuticals.
But but I think to the heart of it, you think about this this this capability. You've seen the matrix. You've seen agent Smith. How agent Smith, the the virus kind of, you know, warden inside the system could morph into any individual, any time, as long as, you know, that person was not awake and wasn't cleansed, wasn't, you know, aware of this this matrix. And thus, it it turned every single person into an unknowing agent of of the government's agenda, whether it be to listen or to watch or to, participate in a form, maybe provide information.
But ultimately, the mindset around this is that if you hear something in your head, up until today, even most people wouldn't believe that that there's a change the status quo. But up until today, you think it's just your internal monologue or or maybe the holy spirit. But the change now is the very group that's lied to us about, the USS Liberty, lied to us about foreign interventions, and lied to us even maybe what's happening overseas right now in Iran. They now have the ability to mimic and pretend to be your inner voice. And what can they do?
It would probably even bring into question every mass shooter who's just randomly snapped, randomly gone crazy. Mean, Jesse, actually, before they they went postal or or were activated, I I suppose we'd say he's been in contact with a few of these individuals. The the Navy Yard shooter, for example. Maybe Jesse can share that. An incredible change, I think, for people's perspective.
Speaker 0: Go ahead, Jesse.
Speaker 2: Well, Aaron Alexis did contact me. He was a US soldier, and he was having these exact same symptoms. And he said, I heard that you could help me. And I said, Yeah, I could. But it is a long journey.
We're going to have to do a lot of testing and this is not a quick fix. And I thought he was going to go along with the program and then the following week, he goes and kills 12 people at the Navy Yard. And in the butt of his rifle, he inscribes the letters E L F, extremely low frequency. Now what Edward touched upon is in Project Artichoke, if you look at the outline goals, part of the outline goals was to create unknowing assets, unknowing spies. So if your thoughts are no longer private, what you visualize is no, no longer private, what your brain transmits in the form of EEGs, this telepathic means, nothing is secretive anymore.
You know, people, when I mentioned this analogy, just imagine for those of you who are in a relationship or married and your wife asked if you're, am I fat in this dress? Do I look fat in this dress? You can no longer be polite because you care about her feelings. Your true thoughts are going to be exposed. That is the society that we're heading towards.
And we have to have a serious discussion about this topic. In fact, there is a congresswoman by the name of oh, it's skipping me right now. Luna? Luna out of Florida. She is the chair for the task force on the declassification of federal secrets.
And she is recommending that their next hearing be about a follow-up to MKUltra, because our inferences and what she's disseminating is they are aware about non consensual experimentation that's happening on US citizens today. And the fact is it is and it's legal to do. And this is why we have to have a serious discussion, about this topic.
Speaker 0: So this graphene oxide, when we talk about so if our viewers are watching right now and they're thinking, well, is this in my body? Am I controllable? How is this different than Havana syndrome? Or how if I'm I don't have this in my body, how are they manipulating individuals using this Havana syndrome protocol? Maybe you could help me walk through this and make sense of some of the differentiation there.
Speaker 2: Well, remember, the graphene oxide is an amplifier. And what, you know, I'm an independent investigator aside from a company called Human Consciousness Support, Matt Hazen is the CEO to that organization. And when they approached me saying that they were getting specific results regarding blood testing, about excreting this out of the human system, at least bringing it down to levels that were much lower than anticipated, I was very intrigued. So the way graphene oxide works or this nanotech works is you can send an RF emission at a specific frequency range, and it will have a cause and effect. In California, there was a case
Speaker 0: By the way, can I just say before you go on, Jesse, we I'll put a link in the description box because we during our last interview, I put that same link there? If anyone wants to go and sign up for this and figure out how to get this out of their bodies, I'll have a link, in our description. Think and I think Matt was kind enough to give our audience a discount too. So, again, I'm not connected with it at all. I just wanna say, I wanna help people.
If people wanna get this out of their bodies and they wanna look more deeply into it, I'll put a link in the description for people. So go ahead. Sorry, Jesse. I didn't mean to interrupt.
Speaker 2: Yeah. But but by the way, you know, I I helped them with a trial study they were doing in The UK where we took we used a control where we took a mean average of what the silicone indicators were and it was somewhere around 1,400. And then they monitored the locations where they came up positive, all lining up exactly how my symptomatic clients have been over prior to that pandemic. And prior to the pandemic, those who were non symptomatic never lit up. But now everyone is lighting up after that post event.
Now, when I went back in two months, I was completely shocked. Never before had I seen areas disappear. So once you lit up in a location, no matter where I took you on this planet, you would always light up in that same area. When I went back, they saw a mean average of 74.6% and it would have been 80 except we had two people, one who had a vaccine injection during the testing process and then one whose lifestyle change, who had a relationship with someone who had the vaccine. So we know it works.
I am pleasantly surprised and that this is right now at least something that we can do to minimize the levels of these graphene oxidizing the silicon based amplifiers that are in you. Now, Doctor. Ghida Basile disclosed that these things were all controlled with RF emissions. And so, mechanism and the reasoning why this was implemented is because they wanted to make sure when we transition to six gs, that they have the maximum means of amplification in order to transmit these frequencies and they're penetrating deeper into the skin. Unfortunately, our President recently accelerated the six gs implementation here in The United States.
And when he was asked about it, he says, Oh, it penetrates a little deeper into the skin. Right? I thought that was really bizarre.
Speaker 0: Yeah. He made a point of Edward talking about the sick g will be able to basically penetrate into the skin. And we won't be able to escape this. Right? So really, the way for us to try to escape this or prevent us from being manipulated by six g is to have this graphene oxide and these other amplifiers maybe out of our blood?
Speaker 1: A 100%. And and and what I would I would say to president Trump if I I get the opportunity to speak to me for a minute is, sir, that could be your skin. That could be your family's skin. And we haven't even had a discussion about the national security implications of a foreign power or a tech mogul or somebody having the capability to essentially remote into someone's brain to see what they're seeing, hear their thoughts, hear what's being said in a room. It's it's not even a microphone hidden in a desk or a wall anymore.
You are the microphone.
Speaker 0: You are the sales tool. Can I that's a great point? You're bringing up a great point because as I was speaking to, you know, a source the other day on a story, he was saying he was laughing at the response of the Venezuelan attack where we were using, you know, we were using this like advanced technology, but it's really like 30 year old technology that we were using when we went in and all of these soldiers suddenly were like bleeding from their noses and they just sort of collapsed. And they were having, like, anxiety attacks and everything else. So this was, like, 30 year old technology that we we were using in Venezuela.
And the source I was speaking to, he said he said he just laughed when he heard about that because the stuff that we have now is just so far advanced. So imagine, as you say, a foreign entity, a foreign power controlling the president of The United States Manchurian candidate style. I mean, this is what we're talking about here. It sounds fake, but it's real.
Speaker 1: A 100%. Yeah.
Speaker 2: If there ever Yeah.
Speaker 1: Go ahead, Jesse. Go ahead.
Speaker 2: If there ever was a national security issue, is it. Because when colonel colonel Greg Eggreen gave testimony at the Department of Homeland Security's hearing on 05/08/2024, he he disclosed that this was taking out the best of our best in the CIA, FBI, and not only our diplomats, and now it's happening to congressional members. But if you ever wanted to have a security breach, this is it. This is the security breach. So then and and president Putin, back in 2010, when I was doing radio, he gave an interview to the Politico, and he said the first superpower to master psychotronic weapons will be the superpower to rule the world.
You know, we profess that we are a democracy. We are a free country. But are we really, if your mind is the last frontier that has been conquered? There is not one single continent on this globe right now that does not have cases of people complaining of age eyes or Havana syndrome today. So let that sink in.
What is the cognitive freedom of your children, your great grandchildren and your genealogy to come? Are they really free? They will believe that it's always been this way and it's okay.
Speaker 0: Edward, when you look at Havana syndrome, what Jesse just pointed out, and there's all around the world people are experiencing this. It's not just people at embassies in Havana, Cuba. Maybe you could talk about some of the differences or similarities between what you uncovered with this MI six whistleblower and maybe Havana syndrome and help us help us navigate that a little bit.
Speaker 1: I I think the first kind of similarity I've seen is is the after effect. I mean, I think for many of the people that have been unfortunate enough to be targeted and attacked and have their minds essentially scrambled by by the government or by these these entities that seek to control and manipulate is that the Afro Impacts, they have a really hard time, you know, maintaining relationships. It's almost as if they have been raped or they have been assaulted, and that the person that's done it to them is not only running free but is never going be held accountable. It has an incredibly demoralizing effect. That by itself could be looked as, oh, it's just a mental thing or it's just like you then look to what they've described as the start point.
Now what was unique about the man that we spoke to in The United Kingdom was he, in a sense, think Jesuit grew maybe with this characterization, He volunteered in a sense. He at least agreed to the technology being used. This isn't always the case with many of the victims. They didn't agree. They were just tested on.
They were used. But he agreed because it was part of his job. And I think what we found across many of the individuals is they've found that unanimously intrusive, bad, negative. With the person we spoke to, it was the first person I'd heard actually say that he feels there could be some good from this technology. Now this could again simply be that because of his line of work, maybe it saved his life.
Speaker 0: Maybe Right.
Speaker 1: He was about to turn a corner and there's a guy who was about to ambush him and and the voice was able to come through and warn him. But he spoke about it in a way that was different in that way. The way it's always the same is when they are attacked, when they are abused, when they're they're essentially assaulted, no one is okay with it. Everyone describes it as rape. And the symptoms, the loss of cognitive functions, the, I think one of the I'm thinking now to the way he described it, he passed out.
He passed out. It was so intense. He passed out on his kitchen floor. And we've heard this in so many cases now, especially publicly, with so many, of the survivors from the Havana syndrome attacks now coming forward with their faces shown because all they wanted people to basically have is they're real. It's not a a fabrication.
It's not a fiction. They are real where the experience was real. And I think that is the shared experience of all these victims. They want to be acknowledged. As Jesse's been noting it, there is no way to acknowledge this right now.
Technically, it's completely legal to use this technology because it doesn't formally exist. And I think this is a dangerous place because you could spy on the president of The United States Of America, and there would be no charges brought against you.
Speaker 0: Jesse, can you say we're running out of time here, but I I'm curious, like, the the the machine or the mechanism by which this is controlled? You know, I I I'm picturing sort of like nineteen fifties like a satellite dish, like a parabolic microphone on the sidelines of an NFL game, like being aimed at somebody. Is it done thousands of miles away? Is it done in a in a truck down the street? We've spoken to CIA whistleblowers on our show who suddenly hit with with an attack on he and his wife, intense headaches, and they had been noticing, obviously, trucks parked down the street from their house.
So, yeah, is this from afar, close by? Maybe you can talk about that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, in the Epstein files, he discloses EMF and RF government and military technology being utilized on civilians and he even talks about the cases. He even names a corporation out of Australia and the contact for that corporation that utilizes this type of technology. The bottom line is what is being disseminated right now? Does directed energy weapons on a on a small scale where you can carry around exist?
Absolutely. But the reality is that is a SIOP and it's misdirection. The reality is and in my studies and my contacts in counter surveillance that this is satellite based integrated with cell towers. The FCC just released the distance restrictions on low powered Wi Fi devices. It's completely gone.
So this is all by design. This is all one complete network system. And unfortunately, there's nowhere to go to escape from this. I've taken people down deep down into granite caverns two miles down in a place called Jackson, California, where you can find a lot of these places. And there's no radio transmissions out there.
You can't get cell phone signal. And we're still detecting the signal deep down within the caverns. But so right now, they're trying to misdirect you, make you believe that this is some device, but think about the logistics. There are 10s of 1000s of people globally who are experiencing this. What is the feasibility to have that many individuals out there being paid to aim a device at these individuals?
It doesn't make sense.
Speaker 0: Doesn't make sense.
Speaker 2: And common sense. Yeah. So that's the reality of this. And the bottom bottom line right now is they're only acknowledging this is happening to federal employees. And it's important that everyone understands that our leaders need to now recognize that I have been covering this topic on civilians since 2010, along with a gentleman by the name of Doctor.
John Hall. But if you think you're immune, you're insane yourself, because this is going to happen to someone in your family, your children, your grandchildren, or someone you care about or love dearly, or maybe even a very close friend. No one is immune from this. And this is why it's important. Now is the time.
The window of opportunity is so small right now. We're in a paradigm shift where complete slavery, regardless of skin color, is gonna be on a plateau that we've never ever seen.
Speaker 0: Edward, final thoughts.
Speaker 1: This is the sovereignty of our our brains and our soul itself. We must fight now. It's more important than any border or any conflict because the conflict now is whether a small few are gonna have the ability to manipulate our very thoughts. We can't have a free society, let alone freedom in our own lives. So I would just say thank you so much for bringing us on, Clayton.
This is going to be part of Died Suddenly two. So if you want to find more about it, just diedsuddenly.info or follow our x account at diedsuddenlyunderscore. And that's, we look forward to sharing more.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Edward. Thank you, Jesse. And like I mentioned earlier, we'll have a link in the description if people wanna try to take action on this graphene oxide in their, you know, in their bodies and, do what they can to protect themselves. I really appreciate it, gentlemen. Thank you for your incredible work on this, and, we'll be following the release of Died Suddenly two.
Thank you so much.
Speaker 2: Bless you. Thank you, Clayton. We really You appreciate
Speaker 0: bet. Thank you, guys.