reSee.it - Related Post Feed

realLizUSA
Posted - September 24, 2021 at 12:41 PM
Saved - August 21, 2023 at 3:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maricopa Audit Report reveals alarming discrepancies: election numbers don't match, missing ballot images, intentional data deletion, illegal ballots counted, and duplicated ballots without serial numbers. Various systems related to elections failed to balance. Thousands of ballots cast by individuals who had moved. Files missing from the Election Management System. Logs intentionally cleared. Mail-in ballots counted incorrectly. Duplicate voters found. Serious concerns about the integrity of the election process. The official results don't align with the county's records. Lack of system reconciliation raises doubts. Numerous irregularities highlight potential fraud.

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

DRAFT Maricopa Audit Report: 🚫None of the County's election numbers match 🚫Ballot images "corrupt or missing" 🚫Election data apparently intentionally deleted 🚫Illegal ballots counted from people who had moved 🚫Ballots duplicated "more than once," missing serial numbers https://t.co/oHji7fCMS4

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

"None of the various systems related to elections had numbers that would balance and agree with each other. In some cases, these differences were significant." The numbers will never add up for Joe Biden!

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

"There appears to be many ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election." "Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server." "Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing."

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

"Logs appeared to be intentionally rolled over, and all the data in the database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully cleared."

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

23,344 mail-in ballots counted from "people that should not have received their ballots by mail because they had moved" Phantom voters https://t.co/UOVqc000Ib

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

10,342 voters "with the same first, middle, last name and birth year" voted in multiple counties Duplicate voters https://t.co/AJHSRBOe3L

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Mail-in ballots are a joke https://t.co/BfZ3mcN1UK

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

The "official results" vs. Maricopa County's final records of who voted are off by 11,592, which is MORE than the election margin How can you certify results that the County can't even back up! #decertify https://t.co/C4JS283hG6

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

"Failing to have systems that reconcile does not breed confidence in the election systems utilized. At best its sloppy, at worst it could cover for fraud that could significantly impact the election results." https://t.co/9rmPN1wkGz

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

2,592 "more duplicates than original ballots" https://t.co/HEtPerp8yM

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

2,382 illegal ballots from voters who no longer lived in Maricopa County https://t.co/4i0Gs3S0Vg

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

2,081 ballots from people who moved outside of the state For some inane reason, Arizona still allows people who move out of state to vote for president, BUT the voting machines do not do "presidential-only ballots" as required https://t.co/CUFmV9w2Gu

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

MULTIPLE precincts had more votes cast than voters who voted https://t.co/buXJjh19T9

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Bleed through was "highly prevalent" for in-person Election Day ballots (voters who favored President Trump) This affected an unknown number of ballots, and "over 200,000 ballot images [were] not readable" The 50,000 illegal ballots is the minimum amount of fraud, not the max https://t.co/3GnDqyGTQN

Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - September 4, 2022 at 9:47 PM
Saved - December 31, 2023 at 2:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A voter-volunteer audit in Maricopa County, Arizona revealed numerous issues with the 2020 ballots. Fake ballots, perfect bubble filling, and various types of paper were discovered. All 2.1 million ballots have been digitized for further analysis. The volunteers deserve gratitude for their efforts.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Welcome Back Election Deniers! The only place in America voters ever got to examine all of their own 2020 ballots after certification was Maricopa County AZ. The AZ Senate AUTHORIZED & SUPERVISED this OFFICIAL audit by voter-volunteers. They found - a lot of problems ... 1/6

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"I would watch the ballots go by, and there were odd patterns. 7 of those ballots were for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. That clearly doesn't .. that's not statistically possible." (Fake ballots were found) - https://uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/ 2/6

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"There were a lot of things we noticed that were not organic. The bubbles being filled in absolutely perfect. It was obviously not done by a human hand - as though they were printed. A human being did not do that." (To do this requires proprietary AZ ballot software access.) 3/6

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"The volunteers stop and look at a ballot. The paper was very very thin. The paper was really thin because when they moved it (gestures as if waving a fan) it was really thin." (Only 1 official ballot paper type was approved, 10 types were discovered by voter-volunteers.) 4/6

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"All counted ballots" in Maricopa County are printed on 80lb VoteSecure ballot paper. Except they weren't. 10 different types/weights of paper were found by the volunteers who examined the 2.1M ballots. 5/6 The American Faces Behind The Audit - Video https://rumble.com/vn4kgx-the-american-faces-behind-the-audit.html

The American Faces Behind The Audit We would like to give a huge flyover family thank you to each person in this video for tirelessly working for a safe and secure election for us all! #SavingAmerica ► Sign Up For Our Newsletter! -https rumble.com

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

And Good News: All 2.1M Maricopa County AZ ballots have been digitized into high rez front & back images - the kind that can be sorted quickly by a computer for specific issues - like counterfeiting. Only one step remains - a NEW Arizona AG who will do it - unlike this guy 👇 6/6

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

ICYMI: The AZ voter-volunteers turned out in force to hear the findings of the forensic ballot evidence they recorded. Every American voter owes them a debt of gratitude. Here is a shot of the room and then a shot when asked to stand if they worked the audit or the canvas.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Well, Well, Well https://arizonasuntimes.com/2022/09/05/true-the-vote-calls-out-arizona-ag-criminal-division-over-mishandling-its-2000-mules-complaint-unmasking-informants/

True the Vote Calls Out Arizona AG Criminal Division Over 'Mishandling' Its '2000 Mules' Complaint, Unmasking Informants - The Arizona Sun Times After over a year of “good faith attempts to work together,” Texas-based election integrity nonprofit True the Vote's Catherine Engelbrecht and lead investigator Gregg Phillips of the OPSEC Group, an election intelligence company, say they no longer trust the intentions of the Arizona Attorney General Office's Criminal Division. arizonasuntimes.com
Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - June 13, 2023 at 12:21 PM
Saved - June 16, 2023 at 1:46 PM

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

If the late-counted 2020 mail ballots were Biden's path to victory why were audits blocked everywhere except in Arizona? In Georgia, corrupt officials & judges are STILL hiding the 2020 ballots, many of which were identified as likely counterfeit by long term poll workers.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

AZ 2020 Counterfeit Ballot Exhibits: Be kind and share? - Maricopa County 2020 Ballot official paper standard - Voter-volunteer ballot hand-examination findings - Maricopa County official response on issue - Further AZ Senate ballot analysis https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Voter Fraud: We've covered official state legislature investigations and court cases about 2020 voter fraud since they began. Voter fraud is real. Legacy media has been hiding it. Voter fraud renders election polling worthless so it has been and will remain a focus of ours. https://t.co/Ps4fsV7Cw8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Only 1 official ballot paper type was approved in Maricopa County for all 2020 election counted ballots, yet 10 types were discovered by voter-volunteers amounting to over 200,000 ‘non-conforming’ (counterfeit) ballots that were counted in a race Joe Biden ‘won’ by far far less. https://t.co/z7QZlaqbhq

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Welcome Back Election Deniers! The only place in America voters ever got to examine all of their own 2020 ballots after certification was Maricopa County AZ. The AZ Senate AUTHORIZED & SUPERVISED this OFFICIAL audit by voter-volunteers. They found - a lot of problems ... 1/6

DecentFiJC
Posted - August 29, 2023 at 1:32 AM
Saved - August 29, 2023 at 1:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Stephen, a Chicagotransplant ginger, is accused of being a lying outcomefixer for Michael Crow and the Najafi bros. He even admitted to election fraud. Arizonans have every reason to doubt him. His incompetence is truly embarrassing.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Stephen, let’s talk about liars. Why should Arizonans believe some lying Chicago-transplant ginger? Let’s start there. I mean, your entire existence is to be an outcome-fixing little bitch for Michael Crow and the Najafi bros. And you can’t even manage to do THAT without getting your own wires crossed. (See below, when you admitted to committing election fraud.) My God, everything about you is embarrassing.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥THE RECAP💥 💥Maricopa Recorder (Stephen Richer) just lied about the number of active registered voters in AZ for the 2022 midterms. 💥His number was off by (at least) 140,000 voters, per Maricopa’s own 2022 Elections Planning docs. 💥He credited ERIC for making it possible.

veryvirology
Posted - December 9, 2023 at 5:58 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 10:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2020 election in Arizona has been a subject of controversy. Claims of stolen ballots, duplicate votes, and manipulated voter rolls have emerged. Allegations include the lack of unique identification numbers on duplicated ballots, a surge of duplicate votes after the polls closed, and the certification of the election without proper chain of custody. Additionally, concerns have been raised about deleted files from the server and the centralized control of voter records. These allegations highlight the need for transparency and accountability in the electoral process.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Remind me. Exactly how was the 2020 election stolen in Arizona? Throw it all at me. Fact, conspiracy theory, rumors that were ostensibly proven false. I'm looking for something, but I don't know what. Help right now will go a long way.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

“HUNDREDS of log books” - recording every anomaly of Maricopa County Arizona’s 200,000+ non-conforming (counterfeit) 2020 election ballots. Biden ‘won’ the state by less than 12,000 ‘votes.’ Time to roll out the log books…

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s how the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs stole 2 elections and covered it up. “Batch after batch after batch of ballots sent to duplication. But there is no unique serial number or identification number on the ballot had to be duplicated.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are concerns about duplicate ballots in the audit. The count should be 3 lower due to duplicates, but they are not accounted for. Logan explains that duplicate ballots are created when the original is damaged and cannot be processed. Each duplicate should have a 6-digit serial number matching the original, but they cannot find the corresponding originals. They have found duplicate ballots with a unique identifier, but no matching serial number on the original. This creates difficulty in matching duplicated ballots with their originals. The concern is that the numbers do not add up and the reality does not match the sheets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You'll notice that there's 3 that are duplicates. So while the count in here, we'd expect it to be 3 lower, than than what the total count was because they're taken out for duplicates. For the example that they gave us, there's nothing listed. And so our understanding, if this form is filled out properly, the duplicate should be referenced in here, and we're not finding that be the case. And our numbers across the board showed that. We we took into account duplicates in the information that we gave, and it wasn't explained. So I'm still uncertain as to why these boxes are off and these these sheets do not match the reality of what we're running into. Speaker 1: Logan said that duplicate ballots are created when the original ballot is damaged and can't be run through the system. According to the former Secretary of State and current audit director, Ken Bennett, each duplicate ballot must have a 6 digit serial number printed on it That matches a 6 digit serial number printed on the original damaged ballot that it corresponds to. However, Bennett said they can't find the original ballots that match up To the duplicated ballots. Speaker 2: We are finding a 6 digit unique identifier, serial number. It says in 16/6/21 on the duplicate ballots, but we're not finding a corresponding serial number on the Original ballot that was damaged or otherwise had to be duplicated. In fact, I I was so surprised that I, brought the The 2 observers from the Secretary of State's office over, along with some other volunteer observers from various parties, just to kind of document that We're running into, batch after batch after batch of ballots sent to duplication, but there's no unique Serial number or identification number on the ballot that had to be duplicated that should correspond with a ballot over in the has been duplicated box. Speaker 1: Bennett said those should match up 1 for 1, and they should match up to the total number of ballots as a whole. Speaker 2: We are Struggling as to how we're going to be able to match up ballots sent to be duplicated with the ballots that were duplicated If one of those, the originals, are missing that 6 digit

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s Katie Hobbs to Maricopa County, How many ballots is needed? Between Nov 4th and Nov 9th a massive surge of duplicate Bidens received AFTER polls closed on Insurrection Day 2020, “25-30%” of all double votes received after election eventually counted in the Insurrection.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker discusses a comparison between two things. They mention that there has been a 25% increase in duplicates in the past 6 days, specifically between November 4th and 9th. They also mention that they found some interesting information through further analysis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Versus what we have. And what we're also gonna see shortly is that we're gonna see that we also saw through further analysis the 25% surge of duplicates in the last 6 days between, November 4th to 9th. We also saw some very interesting

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is the Insurrection of Nov 2020 Maricopa County executed and McConnell certified with NO CHAIN OF CUSTODY. 95% of [Military…] towards a candidate who won by 10,000 votes that’s 8,000 new votes where people brought home because of a pandemic compared to 2016 of 1600.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was responsible for the traffic forensic portion of the audit and the quality control of the ballots. I handled damaged, large print, braille, and special ballots, including the UOCAVA ballots for overseas voters. These ballots are actually just regular 8.5 by 11 white sheets of copy paper. In 2016, there were 1,600 UOCAVA ballots, but in 2020, there were nearly 9,600. As an eyewitness, I can say that 95% of these ballots went to one candidate. This resulted in a net gain of 8,000 votes for that candidate, who won the state by just over 10,000 votes. This increase in UOCAVA ballots was due to the pandemic and the return of military personnel.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Traffic forensic portion of the audit and was the floor manager for the last few weeks of quality control. I was there when the last pallet at the auditorium left. My name is on the chain of custody forms of hundreds of thousands of ballots. So because of the accuracy seeing efficiency in my teams, we were tasked with tallying of the damaged ballots, large print ballots, braille ballots, and the special ballots set aside by the Senate. I specifically had the Senate liaison, the Secretary of State observers, and John Branke at my tables every day multiple times a day. But specifically, I was tasked with doing the UOCAVA ballots. A UOCAVA ballot is the Uniform Overseas Civilian Absentee Voting Act ballot. That ballot is sent out to our men and women who work overseas and for our federal people that work overseas to get a chance to vote in the elections. 2 seconds. This is what a ballot looks like that goes out to everybody, right? 11 half by 19 ballot. When I opened up the boxes of ballots, this is what a ballot looks like, that's a UOCAVA ballot. Do you know what that is? That's an 8a half by 11 white sheet of copy paper. Did you all know that our ballots come back like this from our overseas people? Did any of you know this? It was such a sham that I had people every day at my table's counting the picture taking pictures of these ballots that were scanned down. The ballots are scanned. It took my teens 3 complete days to count all of the UOCAVA ballots. You know why? Because in 2016, the numbers were apparently there were 1600 UOCAVA ballots that came back in the most significant election of our lifetime. In 2020, the numbers were close to 9,600 ballots came back. And I will tell you as an eyewitness as an eyewitness, 95%, because I was asked to tally these personally by the Senate liaisons all went towards 1 candidate. And in a state where this that candidate won by a little over 10,000 votes, That is a net gain of 8,000 new votes during an election when people were brought home, because there was a pandemic And because our federal people, our our our our military people, were brought home
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the low number of guardsmen deployed and the lack of active duty personnel in Afghanistan and Iraq. They mention voting absentee in the past and not trusting the postal service. The speaker questions the significance of the 9,800 guardsmen currently deployed compared to the 16,600 in 2016. They emphasize the need to investigate these issues. Additionally, they raise doubts about the authenticity and chain of custody of the ballots. The other speaker agrees with their point.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what this is what, I'm I'm having a difficult time with. We don't have that many guardsmen deployed. We don't have that many, and that was, we're talking about the winding down of Afghanistan, and almost a skeleton crew in Iraq of active duty deployed. When I was in the Marines, I voted absentee, I actually had a ballot, I never heard of this vote by email. Well, you had Speaker 1: a ballot, but you sent it in somehow. Speaker 0: Yeah. And of course, I'm convinced none of my absentee ballots ever made it in because I don't trust the postman. Okay. Anyway, but, especially if you're on ship. There's no there really is no male buoy out there that everybody is anyway. But I'm having a hard time grasping this 9, what, 9800? Speaker 1: 9600 plus, yes. Close to 10,000. Speaker 0: In what? In 2016, we had what? Speaker 1: A little over 16,600. Speaker 0: Which might make more sense. Our entire guard It's not even that many people, and we don't have anybody deployed. This is yeah. Okay. These are things that really need to be looked at. And then once again, we don't have no way of knowing that, that piece of paper that you pulled out of the boxes was a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy. So really, realistically, the chain of custody on that is kind of like out the door? Speaker 1: Correct.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here’s how long the 2020 Insurrection took in Maricopa County Mitch McConnell certified in a rush. So, there were trucks of Robert L. Peters coming in on the 3rd, on the 4th, on the 5th, on the 6th, on the 7th, on the 8th, on the 9th and then on the 10th, and …

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trucks from a company called Runbeck were continuously delivering ballots for several days. The speaker is unsure of the exact duration but mentions that they were still coming in on their last day, which was the 10th. Runbeck is a high-speed scanning company that handles the scanning and printing of duplications, possibly including military ballots. The speaker is uncertain about the purpose of scanning the ballots off-site and whether they were printed or scanned. They mention that the high-speed scanning happens at Runbeck and that there were no observers present. The speaker also raises questions about the origin of the ballots and suggests asking county employees for clarification.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Yeah. Okay. Dude, just a minute. I'm I wanna make sure that we capture this properly. So there were trucks that showed up on 3rd, and then the 4th and then the 5th and How long did that go? How many days? I wasn't Speaker 1: there the whole last week, but Speaker 0: I know as long as you can recall how many days? Speaker 1: My last day was 10th and they were still coming in. Coming from a company called Runbeck that does the high speed scanning and Printing of duplications and I think the military ballots. And now I'm getting I'm getting out of my comfort level here talking about this. I don't know what they're doing, but those ballots were coming in from a high speed scanning company called Runbeck that Apparently, you haven't heard of Runbeck? Speaker 0: No, I've heard a run back, ma'am. What I'm trying to figure out is whether they printed them or they scanned them. And if they scanned them off-site, To what purpose? Speaker 1: I I can't tell Speaker 0: you that. Because wasn't that your job to scan them? Speaker 1: Well, Speaker 0: I I think not your job, but Speaker 1: Yeah, no, no. All the high speed scanning happens at Runbeck So those ballots go to Runbeck As far as I know, there were no observers there I don't know I never got called to work at Rembeck I guess all I can tell you Speaker 0: Okay, with all due Mr. Cook, now we've opened up a whole new can of worms. Speaker 1: Yeah. And again, we don't know enough about it to be the witness. Speaker 0: No, that's fine. I just Your observation is useful here. So what you're telling me I'm going to play this back to you in a second. The scanning wasn't actually done on-site at a Maricopa County structure. It was done someplace else. Speaker 1: Where they have very high speed scanners. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, I right now, I really don't care what Speed is up. I wanna know, were they Dominion Scanners? Or they were No. Speaker 1: No. I don't think they're I don't think it has anything to do with Dominion. Speaker 0: So I'm trying to understand What was the purpose of scanning them in advance of them being tabulated on the Dominion equipment? Speaker 1: They were duplicate duplications, The ballots that wouldn't read through the tabulation machines. They were ballots that came in from military and overseas. But there were more ballots than that. So I don't know where the rest of them were coming from because they kept bringing trays of them in. So I don't know where they were coming from. That's a question for the county employees to explain to you where those ballots came from. That whole next week. I don't know where they came from. Speaker 0: Mister Kooky, are you done?

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@larrydarp - LA Darpinian

@rob_voreck @AZAGMayes @realAlexKolodin How did the first auditors certify the 2020 election when it had already been deleted off the server by Maricopa County? "I find it frankly laughable to suggest that a county in response to a subpoena could say we will delete files from the hard drive..." https://rumble.com/vucnp3-maricopa-county-election-workers-caught-red-handed-deleting-archived-files-.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5

Maricopa County Election Workers CAUGHT RED-HANDED Deleting “Archived” Files From Server Before Del EXCLUSIVE – ELECTION FRAUD ON VIDEO: Maricopa County Election Workers CAUGHT RED-HANDED Deleting “Archived” Files From Server Before Delivery To Auditors This Content Is Mirrored. Please support the o rumble.com

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Oh, it appears the Access Voter Information Database (AVID) Project was designed to prepare for and foster the transition of control of voter records and data to becoming a highly centralized model (from a Hybrid Model) — voter records and data would then be controlled by Secretaries of State and capable of being updated in real-time at respective registrar’s offices. How convenient. And it also appears Garrett Archer was running point for all this as the “Project Manager” for the AVID Project. Imagine that.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

💥THE RECAP💥 💥Maricopa Recorder (Stephen Richer) just lied about the number of active registered voters in AZ for the 2022 midterms. 💥His number was off by (at least) 140,000 voters, per Maricopa’s own 2022 Elections Planning docs. 💥He credited ERIC for making it possible.

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

So they had direct control over the voter rolls & manipulated them to create ~145,000 imaginary voters, produced extra mail-in ballots for them, completed them & forged the envelopes, had them counted without chain of custody, and also double+ scanned some of them? @DecentFiJC

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Noting

@GrizzAliDaddy - Grizz Ali

@veryvirology Per Tesla labs report - 17% of ballots in Maricopa were printed on fake paper - 300k ballots. Dominion vote readers have the ability to read paper stock, but that feature wasn’t turned on. https://cdn.locals.com/documents/545370/545370_4xvgkqqog5dnih1.pdf

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Real paper for the fraudulent mail-in votes, due to the voter roll manipulation & production within the ordinary process; fake paper provided to in-person voters to break machines & send election day votes to adjudication

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

AZ 2020 Counterfeit Ballot Exhibits: Be kind and share? - Maricopa County 2020 Ballot official paper standard - Voter-volunteer ballot hand-examination findings - Maricopa County official response on issue - Further AZ Senate ballot analysis https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

So the election day & subsequent days' contact points are: Delivery of ballots without chain of custody Delivery, loading of bad ballot paper Falsified envelope signature verification Adjudication process Offsite transport, storage & destruction Double-scanning Did I miss any?

@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸

Each of those steps requires observably criminal actions by a person that is in on it & deliberately committing election fraud. Maybe not so much the ballot paper delivery or loading. That just requires incompetence & sloppiness.

Real_RobN
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 1:46 AM
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 8:42 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here is Sen. Majority Whip Sonny Borrelli who examined just only 5% sample ballots cast in the Maricopa County 2020 Insurrection, 1,298 dead voters, 17,822 mismatched ballots, and thousands of other statutory crimes, Here are the dead voting even before ballots were mailed out. https://t.co/UgytHA7sdE

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 2020 election, we analyzed 30 voters out of a total of 1283. We found examples of voters who had passed away but still cast a ballot. For privacy reasons, we have redacted the obituaries. These cases were confirmed by the Secretary of State and public records. One voter died on September 29, 2020, but their ballot was cast on October 10, 2020, before it was mailed. Another voter who passed away on September 27, 2020, had their ballot envelope dated September 16, 2020. Ballots were not mailed until October 7. There were other instances of voters who had passed away but still voted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the 2020 election, that number of voters was 1283, and we have analyzed 30. Here are some of the examples of the voters we found. For the privacy of the families, We have redacted the obituaries that each of these were confirmed by the Secretary of State, other public records, and all contained public obituaries matching the dates of birth, the address, the city of origin, the sex, and the location and state of residence. This particular voter died on 9 29, 2020 and cast a ballot On October 10, 2020, dying prior to the ballot being mailed, This particular voter was canceled deceased, died on 9/27 of 2020, And as you can see the ballot envelope is dated 9/16/2020. Ballots were not mailed by the State of Arizona until October 7th. This voter on ninetwenty seventwenty twenty passed away a U. S. Navy man who ended up having A ballot casting his name on October 9, 2020. This voter passed away on 9 10 of 2019 voted in more than 1 election and had moved to Illinois where they passed away with their loved ones prior to this election casting a vote on October 12, 2020. This voter Also, on 9/29/2020, had a funeral service at Veterans Memorial and then voted on October 6th. And remember, ballots are not issued in the mail until October 7.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 2:20 AM
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 3:11 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Get your mind blown tonight? Here’s how the Sinaloa Cartel’s Secretary of State Katie Hobbs stole another election, This is just out of 300K ballots examined, Voter deceased as of Oct 1 800 blank 1800 no signatures And her tabulators rejected a quarter of a million Kari Lakes https://t.co/Y0PvZI9WLQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 2022 election in Arizona, numerous irregularities were found. One example is a ballot envelope of a deceased voter that passed without challenge. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature were also counted, which violates state statutes. Additionally, there were voter registration files with incorrect signatures. The tabulators used in Maricopa County did not meet the required error rate, averaging 235 times higher than the standard. This led to the rejection of over a quarter of a million ballots due to feed errors. These issues highlight the problems in the election process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I want the audience wants their mind blown this morning. Give us 1 or 2 examples that you think are the most egregious. Speaker 1: Sure. So we processed a dead voter ballot envelope. The man died several days before the election. And on the ballot signature component where they're supposed to sign their name, Somebody wrote on there, voter is deceased as of October 1st, signed his name, and that passed right through without any form of challenge whatsoever. Over 800 blank ballots with no signature at all, which is a secondary statute violation. Because in the state of Arizona, there's no curing a blank envelope without a signature on election day. That that vote shouldn't count. We found 1800 out of 300,000 analyzed. They have no signature whatsoever, no phone number, no date. We have seen voter registration files with the wrong signatures on them. It's a disaster. Well, let me tell you how perfect this election was. We also analyzed the slog files, Okay? The slug files are the system log files that tell you every read in those tabulators for the 2022 election. They claim that the EAC is the regulating agency that takes care of those tabulators and decides which ones are used and how they're used. These tabulators are not to exceed an error rate of 0.002 or 1 in 500 ballots. On election day. Maricopa County used 446 tabulators, not one of them met EAC standard. As a matter of fact, they averaged 235 times the EAC standard, rejecting over a quarter of a 1000000 ballots in ballot feed errors
Curiousityfirst
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 10:21 PM
Saved - December 27, 2023 at 12:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Maricopa County, Arizona, documents reveal a discrepancy of 45,483 registered voters between pre and post L&A testing. Screenshots show different numbers of registered voters before and after testing, and evidence suggests that write-in candidates are out of sequence. Notably, neither Republican signed the post test. Stay tuned for Part 2, which will explore the composition of these registered voters.

@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat

BREAKING: Maricopa County, Arizona General Election 2022 (Part 1) Documents reveal that the Pre L&A Testing and the Post L&A Testing HAVE DIFFERENT DATABASES. A VARIANCE OF 45,483 REGISTERED VOTERS. Screenshot 1: PRE L&A Testing Registered Voters: 2,480,880 Screenshot 2: POST L&A Testing Registered Voters: 2,435,397 Screenshot 3: Slog file Message confirms Election database version: 1.24 is not same as election domain version Further evidence shows that the write-in candidates are out of sequence. Neither Republican Signed the POST test. STAY TUNED: Part 2. The composition of the 45,483 Registered Voters. @KariLake @FannKfann @BarnettforAZ @RealMarkFinchem @ShawnSmith1776 @ParikhClay @mad_liberals @FSociety_1942 @LeadingReport @Rach_IC @DC_Draino @ConradsonJordan @CannConActual @VoterGa @GAballots #arizona @KariLakeWarRoom @AbrahamHamadeh

Real_RobN
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 12:41 AM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 2:32 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Katie Hobbs belongs in prison +37,000 security queries logs deleted +4000 registered/voted after deadline +11,000 voted not on voter rolls +18,000 voted/removed after election +74,000 ballots returned/counted NO RECORD EVER BIENG SENT OUT And Dominion’s best friend SHARPIES https://t.co/vs2fastaQn

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker highlights several concerning issues related to the recent election. They mention the deletion of security logs, thousands of voters registering and voting after the deadline, individuals voting who were not on the voter rolls, and ballots being sent without evidence. The speaker also mentions a memo from Maricopa County instructing the use of Sharpies on election day, which raises concerns about ballot validity. They suggest that Republicans who waited to vote on election day may have been affected by this. Overall, the speaker raises questions about the integrity of the election process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At me from the hearing last week, was the 37,000 plus security queries in March that occurred that where logs were deleted, the almost 4,000 registered voters, registered and then voted after the October 15th deadline. And then of course the 11,000 who voted, who weren't on the voter rolls the 7th November, but showed up in December on the 4th December. And then of course the 18 who voted and were removed from the roles after the election. But then the biggest data point that jumped out at all of us, was the fact that over 74,000 mail in ballots occurred without any evidence of anything having been sent to them. So this is where nearly 7, 7 times The total The delta, right. And think about this, the memo that we now have found that Maricopa County sent out that said, hey, Sharpies are what the rule of the day will be on election day. And I just tried it last night on a regular piece of paper in my printer using a Sharpie as though I were filling in a bubble and clearly it bled through to the other side, which then of course calls into question the ballot and makes it have to be adjudicate. And the fact that Sharpies were encouraged just solely for election day really begs the question that as everyone knew, Republicans who waited to vote on election day as they did in my 4 counties, predominantly did show up on that day.
Real_RobN
Posted - December 23, 2023 at 6:31 PM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 7:02 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And the Arizona Senate Audit, Katie Hobbs sent 23,344 mail in ballots to voters who voted in the Arizona Nov 3, 2020 General Insurrection even though they moved. So who voted? https://t.co/8aQTmbBLYa

Video Transcript AI Summary
We compared the voter rolls to identify people who had moved but still voted by mail. We excluded cases where someone with the same last name still lived at the address. This led us to find 23,344 individuals who voted from addresses they no longer resided at. Mail-in ballots cannot be forwarded, so the only legal way for this to happen is if the voter knows the current resident and arranges to pick up their ballot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we went and took the voter rolls, and we compared them against this to see how many people might have moved, and based on statute 44 44 voters who voted via mail in ballots even though they showed in Melissa as having moved from that address. We accounted for the circumstances where a college student might have moved away from home or a family member might have moved somewhere else. So we actually eliminated all the all the cases where someone was still at that residence that had the same last name. That's how we came up with 23,344. So if your mail in ballot is sent to an address that you no longer live at, there should be no way for that for you to receive that mail in ballot, at least they're, you know, it's generally nice a way for you to reset mail ballot because mail in ballots are legally not allowed to be forwarded, so it can't be forwarded to your new address. So the only way this situation could happen legally e is if you know the prior you know, if you know the current resident and you're able to meet with them and pick up your mail in ballot or somehow have some other arrangement to pick up your ballots were there. But still 23,344 people voted when they should no longer, you know, have access, you know, would not normally have access at that given address.
Curiousityfirst
Posted - December 24, 2023 at 8:58 PM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 7:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Overnight, 45K registered voters were added and then removed in Maricopa County, Arizona for the 2022 general election. Official records show the following: 2,435,397 registered voters at the cutoff, 2,480,880 before L&A testing (including the extra 45K), and 2,435,397 after L&A testing. Any registrations after the cutoff are excluded from the election. Share to help the people of Maricopa get the answers they deserve.

@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat

BREAKING: 45K EXTRA REGISTERED VOTERS ADDED OVERNIGHT IN MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA 2022 GENERAL ELECTION then REMOVED THEM DURING AN ELECTION.👇 Cutoff 11th October 2,435,397 L&A Testing 12th October 2,480,880 Election Certification 2,435,397 According to their Maricopa County's own official records. Slide 1: Registered Voters as at the Cutoff 2,435,397 Slide 2: Pre L&A - 2,480,880 (extra 45K) Slide 3: Post L&A - 2,435,397 Slide 4: Chart for visual understanding Any registrations after the cutoff are excluded from the 2022 election. Please retweet and share so that the good people of Maricopa can ask and get the answers they deserve. #Trump @AZGOP #Arizona #Trump2024 #Elections2024 @KariLake @KariLakeWarRoom @BlehmLawAZ @LeadingReport @FSociety_1942 @Rach_IC @Ryan_L_Heath @WendyRogersAZ @Peoples_Pundit @RealAmVoice @realLizUSA @AbrahamHamadeh @TalkMullins @ShawnSmith1776 @pjcolbeck @PatrickByrne @TPPatriots @realAlexKolodin @RealAlexJones #MerryChristmas @ElectionWiz @ArizonaSunTimes @elonmusk @KristenNHammond @JenWEsq @j3669 @RealSKeshel @RealMarkFinchem

Real_RobN
Posted - December 25, 2023 at 7:34 PM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 10:02 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here’s the conspiracy that overturned the results of the 2020 election 11,326 people did not show up on Nov 7 voter rolls after votes were cast then appear on Dec 4 voter rolls Just to be clear they show they voted on Nov 3, 2020 Explanation: Katie Hobbs find me more votes https://t.co/LLatWJxukD

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the discussion, Speaker 1 mentions an interesting observation regarding the voter rolls. They found that 11,326 individuals who were not listed on the November 7th version of the voter rolls appeared on the December 4th version, despite showing as having voted in the recent election. Speaker 0 seeks an explanation for this discrepancy, emphasizing that they are not implying fraud but simply seeking answers. Speaker 1 admits they cannot think of a logical explanation and suggests reaching out to the county for clarification. The conversation ends there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. Continue. Okay. Speaker 1: So we have also seen some interesting things related to the voter rolls. So for example, we have 11,326 people that did not show up on November 7 version of the voter rolls that should have been after votes were cast but then appeared on December 4th voter rolls. And just to be clear, they show as voted in this past election, but they were not in November 7th version of the file, and they were they did show up on the December 4th version. Speaker 0: Okay. That sounds confusing. Is there give me an explanation of why that might have I mean, we're not obviously, we're not saying there's fraud. We're not saying anything else. I'm just trying to find answers. Is there a logical explanation why that would be? Speaker 1: I cannot think of a logical explanation on what that would be. But it'd be a great thing to hear back from the county to see if there's anything that we're not thinking of. Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you. Continue. Speaker 1: So we
Curiousityfirst
Posted - December 25, 2023 at 9:34 PM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Evidence suggests that the election program in Maricopa County, Arizona was altered. PRR documents reveal that two candidates were added after L&A testing, affecting the tabulation of election results. The author believes that Steve Robinson should have won the race and calls for answers. Merry Christmas to all.

@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat

BREAKING: MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, 2022 GENERAL ELECTION - EVIDENCE SUGGESTS THAT THE ELECTION PROGRAM WAS ALTERED - RT RT RT PRR Documents reveal 2 candidates were ADDED AFTER L&A TESTING DURING THE ELECTION. Please see Pre and Post L&A TESTS.👇 Legislative District 22 - Pre Test had 11 Candidates and Post Test had 13 Candidates. That affects the tabulation of the election results. I firmly believe that with the repositioning of the candidates Steve Robinson should have won this race! Please share - the good people of Maricopa deserve answers. Merry Christmas Everybody!!! @JenWEsq @j3669 @mad_liberals @KariLake @KariLakeWarRoom @AZGOP @TheAndersPaul @FSociety_1942 @AzPinkLady @ShawnSmith1776 @CannConActual @AbrahamHamadeh @MadLiberals @realAlexKolodin @wmahoney5 @Ryan_L_Heath @voterGA @GAballots @WethePeopleAZA1 #Arizona@BlehmLawAZ#arizona @ParikhClay @KariLakeWarRoom @Rach_IC @CannConActual #arizona #Trump #trump2024 @j3669 @mattvanbibber @MAGAIncWarRoom @pjcolbeck @RealMattCouch @TalkMullins @realLizUSA

Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - December 30, 2023 at 5:15 PM
Saved - December 31, 2023 at 1:51 PM

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Fact Check: Over 200,000 counterfeit 2020 ballots were identified in the official preliminary AZ Senate forensic ballot analysis, all evidenced by ballot images and voter-volunteer created anomaly log books. https://x.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1647258387044876288?s=20

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

AZ 2020 Counterfeit Ballot Exhibits: Be kind and share? - Maricopa County 2020 Ballot official paper standard - Voter-volunteer ballot hand-examination findings - Maricopa County official response on issue - Further AZ Senate ballot analysis https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@TomWestbrk - Tom Westbrook 🇺🇲

@PootDibou @Rasmussen_Poll The Pulitzer report identified 10k counterfeit ballots.

Real_RobN
Posted - January 28, 2024 at 4:55 PM
Saved - January 29, 2024 at 5:20 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here is the Arizona Senate Audit, CONFIRMS: 3,981 people voted in the Maricopa County General 2020 Insurrection, despite registering to vote AFTER Katie Hobbs was reprimanded by a court and forced to move the registration date back to the original deadline of Oct 15th. https://t.co/HaDT15iHbf

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Arizona, there was a request to move the voter registration date to election day, but it was moved back to October 15th due to a court case. We found 3,981 individuals who registered after October 15th but their data shows that they have already voted in this election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we have, from what I understand here in Arizona, we are they originally were Hobbs had requested that the registration date for voting be moved up to election day, and there was actually a court case that moved it back to October 15th. Based on the registration information, that that we found in the voter rolls, we have 3,981 individuals who show us haven't voted in this election, and their data shows up in the canvases having voted in this election. However, they were they were rest registered after October 15th.
JovanHPulitzer
Posted - February 20, 2024 at 7:21 PM
Saved - December 26, 2024 at 2:45 PM

@JovanHPulitzer - JovanHuttonPulitzer™

#Facts #Findings #PeoplePaperAndPrograms #MaricopaArizona #2020GeneralElection Please don't download on mobile the files are massive and tens of thousands of individual reports. https://t.co/VYu5DqL4zN

Real_RobN
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 2:56 AM
Saved - February 22, 2024 at 5:33 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, “We now know all of the different ways that are elections are rigged, taken, stolen, WHERE THE FRAUD IS and who is RESPONSIBLE for it” Katie Hobbs sent out 1.5M additional ballots, If Maricopa has 2,575,400 voters why did Maricopa mail just under 4.1M ballots? https://t.co/oEuSKsCFpI

Video Transcript AI Summary
We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so what's going on is we now know all of the different ways that our elections are rigged, taken, stolen, where the fraud is, who's responsible for it, and how it happens. Short one. If Maricopa County has 2,005,400 voters, why did Maricopa mail just under 4,100,000 ballots? You know why? Because if you're gonna steal an election and it's going to be an election by mail predominantly, and if mail is the currency, mail is the contract that mail in ballot. Well, if you're gonna swap ballots or or if you're gonna control it, you have to have extra ballots. Bottom line, they printed 1,500,000 additional ballots. That is why 2 things are occurring. All of these states are trying very hard to avoid us looking at the ballot. But the second thing, think about it. If we were lying about what happened, if it was inconsequential, would they be censoring us? Do they censor people who don't matter? Do they censor topics that really are horse crap? No. They censor us because we have the goods, we have the truth. So understand even censorship that's going on proves we're all on the right track.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jordan Conrad from Gateway Plumbing questions Miss Hobbs about the secret testing on election machines in Maricopa County, Arizona. He asks about discrepancies in signatures on mail-in ballots. Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, oversaw elections in the area. Jordan expresses frustration and asks for a break while at the gym.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How's it going? Jordan Conrad with Gateway Plumbing. So, you know, I have some questions about the election in Arizona. You know, Maricopa County, they did these secret testing on the machines, which for the election procedures manual, you were supposed to oversee, do additional testing on. Did did you authorize this? Miss Hobbs? Miss Hobbs, what about the signatures on the mailing ballot updates? Are you are you aware of what those look like? That they look nothing like the signatures of the voter? Miss Hobbs, as secretary of state, we oversaw elections in Maricopa County and Arizona either. Fucking best for him. You mean I'm at the gym. Give it I'm at the gym. Give it a effing rest. Is that what you said?
BehizyTweets
Posted - September 5, 2024 at 11:23 PM
Saved - September 7, 2024 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned that Poder Latinx has been registering voters outside a DMV in Phoenix without requiring proof of citizenship. A friend of mine, Vlad, encountered their volunteers who misleadingly claimed that an Arizona driver's license suffices for voter registration. This misinformation is concerning, especially with over 40,000 voters in Arizona lacking citizenship verification. The situation raises alarms about election integrity, and I believe we need stricter measures like the SAVE Act to address these issues and ensure our democracy is protected.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: A Democrat organization named Poder Latinx just got BUSTED registering voters outside a DMV in Phoenix, Arizona, without requiring proof of citizenship They tell voters they only need to show a driver's license to register to vote, which DOES NOT prove citizenship. My good friend Vlad from @ANN_News92 went to a DMV to acquire an Arizona driver's license and was greeted near the entrance by volunteers from Poder Latinx who wanted him to get registered to vote. When he asked them what he would need to register, they told him he only needed an Arizona ID because, according to them, only U.S. citizens can get driver's licenses in the state. Vlad immediately called them out because their claim was simply FALSE and dangerous If you ever wonder why there are over 40,000 registered voters in Maricopa County who have failed to provide proof of citizenship, NOW YOU KNOW!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states they can help the individual register when they get their ID. Speaker 1 asserts that an ID does not prove citizenship. Speaker 0 says they moved the individual from citizens in 2013 and that they had IDs in multiple states. The individual acknowledges this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A citizen. I'm not gonna argue that with you. You you can go in there. You'll figure that out. There's So when you get your ID, we can help you register. Oh, okay. Thank you. Speaker 1: That doesn't prove I'm a citizen. That does not prove I'm a citizen. Speaker 0: Okay. I've lived in the I moved you from citizens. What year? 2013. We had IDs in multiple states. Right. So I came in, not it just says up here. When you go in there Uh-huh. If you have

@BehizyTweets - George

This is the real danger to our Democracy... Over 40,000 voters who haven't proved their US citizenship will be voting this November Also, I just want to correct that Maricopa County’s number is over 27k, and 42,301+ is the statewide number People need to go to jail https://t.co/0S252Ljp1H

@BehizyTweets - George

Pray for Arizona's elections because only a miracle will stop the cheating. The SAVE Act is now more important than ever before No wonder Arizona has tens of thousands of non-citizenship verified voters. It must be because county recorders are allowed to accept thousands of voter registration applications while not doing their due diligence to verify the individual's citizenship by comparing it against AZMVD records

elonmusk
Posted - October 2, 2024 at 12:41 AM
Saved - October 3, 2024 at 6:42 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Wow

@amuse - @amuse

ELECTION INTEGRITY: Arizona Democrats insist it was an innocent mistake, but for the last month they've discovered more than 7,000 ineligible voters on their rolls - over 218,000 at last count. They don't have any idea how many of the voters who haven't provided proof of citizenship are illegal or non-citizen voters.

FSociety_1942
Posted - November 6, 2024 at 9:41 PM
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 7:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I monitored the Arizona Senate race updates and found significant discrepancies in the reported results. At one point, Gallego had 596,401 votes while Lake had 489,800, showing a difference of 106,601 votes. Interestingly, Gallego received over 30,000 more votes than Harris, while Lake received about 50,000 fewer than Trump. This raises questions about the credibility of the results. The gap between Gallego and Lake stands at 60,398 votes, but the difference of 82,551 between the two races is concerning. Maricopa County needs to clarify these numbers. I'm willing to share the raw data for verification.

@FSociety_1942 - The Lone Raccoon

BREAKING - EVIDENCE OF FRAUD OR MISCOUNTING IN KARI LAKE'S SENATE RACE As many of you know, I monitored and recorded every update from the NYT site last night. The results in the Arizona Senate race clearly show the the reported results are not credible in any fashion. At 8:02:50 PM local time, Maricopa County is recorded as having an update as follows: Gallego: 596,401 Lake: 489,800 Difference: 106,601 In the same update, the following totals are recorded in the Presidential race: Harris: 564,054 Trump: 539,004 Difference: 24,050 Gallego is reported as receiving over 30,000 votes more than Harris. Conversely, Lake received about 50,000 votes less than President Trump. Given the similarity in the two candidates, this is difficult to believe. You can forget the rest of the race, this single is what makes up the bulk of the election. Why is this important? As of this afternoon, the gap between Gallego and Lake was 60,398 votes. The difference between 24,050 and 106,601 is 82,551. Even is all 17,000 votes which went to the third party Senate candidate were added in, it doesn't bridge the gap between 24,050 and 106,601. Maricopa has some explaining to do. I will be happy to send anyone the raw Json files downloaded from the NYT to anyone wishing to validate these numbers. @karilake @gailgolec @stephen_richer @MaricopaVote @mcsoaz

EvanAKilgore
Posted - November 7, 2024 at 9:42 PM
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 11:38 PM

@EvanAKilgore - Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

With 69% of votes reported in Arizona. Kamala Harris: 1,168,439 votes Kari Lake: 1,185,103 votes Ruben Gallego: 1,235,908 votes You're telling me @KariLake has MORE votes than Kamala Harris but not as much as her opponent?? Something seems fishy...

realLizUSA
Posted - November 9, 2024 at 3:59 PM
Saved - November 9, 2024 at 4:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pima County recently added 14,666 uncounted ballots, which I see as clear evidence of fraud. The totals should remain consistent, and I demand an investigation. This situation mirrors what happened in 2022, and we cannot let it continue. I advocate for no machines, the use of paper ballots, voter ID requirements, same-day voting, and same-day counting to ensure integrity. Additionally, Maricopa County's addition of 25,000 ballots after Election Day raises serious questions about their counting process.

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

Pima County added 14,666 ballots to its total of uncounted ballots on Nov. 8. This is obvious fraud. The totals CANNOT change. Investigate now! https://t.co/2OVPbcQLCB

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

It’s the same thing they did in 2022. We can’t allow this to keep happening! No machines, paper ballots, Voter ID, same day voting, same day counting!

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

🚨🚨 Maricopa County added 25,000 ballots to their totals AFTER Election Day Gee, I wonder why it took them so long to count — it’s easy when you know how many you need! https://t.co/thEpd2kS10

merissahansen17
Posted - November 9, 2024 at 7:42 PM
Saved - November 10, 2024 at 7:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing an update on the 2024 election regarding Arizona officials. Kari Lake, through her attorney, is demanding a thorough explanation for discrepancies in the ballot counts for the US Senate seat. Notably, the estimate of uncounted ballots increased by 14,666 between two reports on November 8. Additionally, the report uploaded at 3:23pm was initially identical to the earlier report at 1:23pm, raising concerns about the accuracy of the data. Lake is insisting that Pima County clarify these discrepancies and provide a complete accounting of the ballot counts.

@merissahansen17 - Merissa Hansen⚡️

UPDATE: 2024 Election Arizona Officials have been Caught Changing the Ballot Totals as Counting for US Senate Seat Continues • Kari Lake, per her attorney, demands a complete accounting as to discrepancies that have been identified in the publicly reported data. Specifically, the estimate of uncounted ballots went up by 14,666 on (Nov. 8) between the reports listed as uploaded at 1:23pm MST (Exhibit B) and 3:23pm MST (Exhibit D). But even more strange than the number of uncounted ballots increasing, at one point, the report purported to be uploaded at 3:23pm (Exhibit C) was initially identical to the report uploaded at 1:23pm (Exhibit B). Without changing the time stamp, two hours later (around 6:00pm MST), the 3:23pm report (Exhibit D) reflected the numbers listed above. Kari Lake for Arizona demands that Pima County provide an immediate explanation of the discrepancies in the numbers combined with complete and accurate accounting of how the number of uncounted ballots increased between the 1:23pm report and the 3:23pm report.

real4815162342
Posted - November 11, 2024 at 9:04 PM
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 11:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered significant discrepancies in the Arizona Senate race results, totaling a net loss of 182,247 votes across various counties. For instance, Maricopa County alone shows a staggering loss of 156,213 votes. Other counties like Pima and Navajo also report substantial losses, while Cochise and Pinal counties exhibit unexpected gains. The data reveals alarming inconsistencies in vote counts and percentages, suggesting potential manipulation. Each county's updates raise questions about the integrity of the election process.

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING ARIZONA SENATE RACE FRAUD‼️‼️ 🧵MASSIVE STATEWIDE ARIZONA FRAUD IDENTIFIED‼️ @KariLake @charliekirk11 I’ve identified a total of -182,247 LOST VOTES simply by taking a screenshots spread out over a few days. I cannot even imagine what the true totals are in AZ‼️ USING @NBCNews election reporting, let’s go alphabetical order with APACHE COUNTY 1st (but wait until you get to Maricopa!!!!) “THEY” throughout this thread is whoever you think is manipulating votes! Thursday 7:26 pm shows Apache County has 24667 votes and are 66.9% counted. 24667 divided by 66.9% means there should be very close to 36,871 total ballots in the election. I checked again at 10:03 pm and 🤯!! The total votes counted remained the same, but the % of vote changed drastically to 74.7%!! Now, magically, there are only 33,021 votes to count! 🚨NET VOTE LOSS -3850 VOTES. 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

COCONINO COUNTY Thursday at 7:26pm, there are 59480 votes and they have counted 77.4%, which is 76,847 total votes to count. At 10:04 pm, the counted votes go up to 64,646, BUT NOW they claim to be 90.5% counted. NOW, there are only 71,432 total votes! 🚨NET LOSS = -5400 VOTES. 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

GILA COUNTY: Thursday 4:24pm, Gila has 23,771 votes at 81.9% counted, which is 29019 total votes. THEN at 11am Friday, there are the SAME VOTES IN at 23,771, but the % of vote has changed to 86.8%, altering the total votes to 27,386. 🚨NET LOSS = -1633 VOTES! 🧵 https://t.co/vd3Ybf3cv5

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

GRAHAM COUNTY looks clean. 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

GREENLEE COUNTY: Thursday 7:26pm 3264 votes at 84.4% total votes, meaning there are 3867 total votes. At 10:04 pm, the 3264 votes remain the same, but the vote % counted increases to 95%, decreasing the total votes to 3436! 🚨NET LOSS = -431 🧵 https://t.co/GKzYCuAC9L

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

LA PAZ COUNTY: Here’s a really unique one. Thursday at 1:21pm, there are 5776 votes at 66.5% total, equaling 8685 total votes. 7:26pm update = 6983 votes @ 80.4% in = 8685 total votes. WOW, that is spot on, TOO SPOT ON‼️ THEN…BOOM! They keep the votes the same at 6983, but alter the vote in % to 90.4%! 🚨NET LOSS OF VOTES= -961 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

🚨🚨🚨MARICOPA MASSIVE FRAUD Thursday 1:21pm they reported 1,518,689 votes @ 68.1% total votes = 2,230,086 total votes in Maricopa. Thursday 10:04 pm update, they reported 1,589,118 @ 74.8% of total votes = 2,124,489 total votes. A NET LOSS OF 105,996 VOTES‼️ But, that wasn’t enough… Friday at 11am, they keep the votes in the exact same at 1,589,118 , but increase the total vote % to 76.5% counted = 2,077,278 total votes… 🚨ANOTHER NET LOSS OF -47,211!! As of this this morning, Maricopa sits at 1,949,441 votes @95% of total votes = 2,073,873. THURSDAY through MONDAY, Maricopa County has lost: 🚨NET LOSS of -156,213 VOTES ‼️‼️ 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

MOHAVE COUNTY IS CLEAN 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

NAVAJO COUNTY: Thursday @1:21 pm they report 42,847 votes @78.6% of total votes = 54,512 total votes. THEN at 10pm, they report 48047 @93.4% of total votes = 51,442 🚨NET LOSS = -3070 VOTES! 🧵 https://t.co/pF9C9aWMvG

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

🚨🚨🚨 PIMA HUGE FRAUD Thursday, 7:26pm they reported 360,942 votes @66.1% of total votes = 546,054 total votes. Thursday at 10pm, they report 376,052 votes @72.6% of total votes = 517,977 total votes! 🚨NET LOSS OF -28077 VOTES‼️ 🧵 https://t.co/pJIcevnFV3

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

COCHISE COUNTY- sorry I forgot this before Coconino, and this is a BIG VOTE INCREASE! On Thursday @4pm, they reported 21,921 votes @43.4% total votes = 50509 total votes. Then…Friday @4pm, they report 25,348 @42.4% of total votes = 59,783 total votes. 🚨NET ADD OF +9,274 Votes‼️‼️ They don’t just take away votes, they add them too! I’ll let you speculate why! 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

PINAL COUNTY: 💥CHECK THIS OUT Remember when APACHE County lost -3850 votes???? Friday at 11am, they reported 185,726 votes @ 87.5% of total votes for 212,258 total votes. But, then Saturday at 5am, they reported 205,289 votes @ 95% of total votes = 216,094 total votes! 🚨NET GAIN of +3836 VOTES! JUST a couple votes makes this EERILY SIMILAR to the loss of -3850 in Apache! It’s like they are maneuvering numbers between counties to make this fraud look possible? 🧵

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: On Thursday at 10pm, they reported 16,871 votes at 82.3 of total votes = 20,499 total votes. Friday at 11am, they report the same total of 16,871 votes, but alter the total vote % to 88% = 19,172 total votes! 🚨NET LOSS -1327 VOTES! 🧵 https://t.co/2KDphWcYSg

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

YAVAPAI COUNTY Thursday 1:22pm, they report 89,888 votes @ 58.4% of total votes = 153,917 total vote. Today at 3pm, they report 127,016 votes @ 84% of total votes = 151,209 total votes. 🚨NET LOSS = -2708 VOTES! 🧵 https://t.co/k4TTqw7Ark

@real4815162342 - 🇺🇸♦️MAGAMAX♦️🇺🇸

YUMA COUNTY Saturday at 5am, they reported 38,240 votes @ 59.2%of total votes for 61,578 total votes. Then Sunday at 5:27am, they reported 39,978 @ 57.2% of total votes = 69,981 votes!! 🚨NET ADD +8313 VOTES‼️‼️ END 🧵 https://t.co/VsERrLQ7KX

Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - January 2, 2025 at 6:36 PM
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 8:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been revisiting the evidence surrounding the 2020 election, focusing on Arizona. The Maricopa County audit, authorized by the AZ Senate, allowed voters to examine their ballots, revealing numerous issues. Observers noted suspicious patterns in the ballots, such as an improbable ratio of votes for Biden and Trump. Additionally, many ballots appeared to be filled in mechanically rather than by hand, and volunteers discovered that over 200,000 ballots were printed on non-approved paper types. A documentary captures the experiences of those involved in the audit.

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

We've reported on 2020 election fraud from Nov 2020 and focused on official state governmental and court adduced evidence. Some of you are new here so - lets start an occasional 2025 recap of state by state 2020 evidence And Let's Begin With - ARIZONA- From Our Files ... 1/8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Welcome Back Election Deniers! The only place in America voters ever got to examine all of their own 2020 ballots after certification was Maricopa County AZ The AZ Senate AUTHORIZED & SUPERVISED this OFFICIAL audit by voter-volunteers They found - a lot of problems ... 2/8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"I would watch the ballots go by, and there were odd patterns. 7 of those ballots were for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump, 7 for Biden, 1 for Trump. That clearly doesn't .. that's not statistically possible." (Fake ballots were found) - 3/8 https://uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"There were a lot of things we noticed that were not organic. The bubbles being filled in absolutely perfect. It was obviously not done by a human hand - as though they were printed. A human being did not do that." (To do this requires proprietary AZ ballot software access.) 4/8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"The volunteers stop and look at a ballot. The paper was very very thin. The paper was really thin because when they moved it (gestures as if waving a fan) it was really thin." (Only 1 official ballot paper type was approved, 10 types were discovered by voter-volunteers.) 5/8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

"All counted ballots" in Maricopa County are printed on 80lb VoteSecure ballot paper. Except they weren't. 10 different types/weights of paper were found by the volunteers who examined the 2.1M ballots. 6/8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

And those 'non-conforming ballots' exceeded 200,000 in number - 7/8

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

There's a great first person documentary of the 2020 Arizona audit voter volunteers attesting to all of this. It's here - and that concludes for today your Arizona 2020 refresher. 8/8 https://rumble.com/vn4kgx-the-american-faces-behind-the-audit.html

The American Faces Behind The Audit We would like to give a huge flyover family thank you to each person in this video for tirelessly working for a safe and secure election for us all! #SavingAmerica ► Sign Up For Our Newsletter! -https rumble.com
Curiousityfirst
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 10:21 PM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 7:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Maricopa County, Arizona, documents reveal that the Pre L&A Testing and Post L&A Testing have different databases, with a variance of 45,483 registered voters. Further evidence shows that write-in candidates are out of sequence, and neither Republican signed the Post test. Stay tuned for Part 2, which will discuss the composition of the 45,483 registered voters.

@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat

BREAKING: Maricopa County, Arizona General Election 2022 (Part 1) Documents reveal that the Pre L&A Testing and the Post L&A Testing HAVE DIFFERENT DATABASES. A VARIANCE OF 45,483 REGISTERED VOTERS. Screenshot 1: PRE L&A Testing Registered Voters: 2,480,880 Screenshot 2: POST L&A Testing Registered Voters: 2,435,397 Screenshot 3: Slog file Message confirms Election database version: 1.24 is not same as election domain version Further evidence shows that the write-in candidates are out of sequence. Neither Republican Signed the POST test. STAY TUNED: Part 2. The composition of the 45,483 Registered Voters. @KariLake @FannKfann @BarnettforAZ @RealMarkFinchem @ShawnSmith1776 @ParikhClay @mad_liberals @FSociety_1942 @LeadingReport @Rach_IC @DC_Draino @ConradsonJordan @CannConActual @VoterGa @GAballots #arizona @KariLakeWarRoom @AbrahamHamadeh

View Full Interactive Feed