reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
Mandatory mask wearing is what the illuminati have decided on. It is not about science, it is about control. Total Control. To bring in the New World Order. Ball is in the people's court. #TotalControl #NWO
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
2. Coronavirus Maskwearing ritual https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RVG8qNLdoY&feature=emb_logo #mask #ritual #illuminati #TotalControl #NWO
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
3. WATCH DR. KELLY VICTORY for the real information re the immune system and infectious diseases, including C-19: https://youtu.be/4QxlvqiaYCM
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
4. Masks don't work - Science.... #NoMasks https://thewallwillfall.org/2020/06/23/masks-dont-work-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covid-19-social-policy/
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
5. #MasksDoNotWork ignore the #bedwetters https://commonsenseevaluation.com/2020/07/13/new-england-journal-of-medicine-wearing-a-mask/
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
6. Research the Science. #IfYouAreSickStayHome #Nomask https://aapsonline.org/mask-facts/
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
7. Cult of the Mask https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/4927-the-cult-of-the-mask #coronavirus #mask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
8. The Science is Conclusive: Masks and Respirators do NOT Prevent Transmission of Viruses #Masks #Coronavirus #demask https://www.sott.net/article/434796-The-Science-is-Conclusive-Masks-and-Respirators-do-NOT-Prevent-Transmission-of-Viruses
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
9. Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Healthy https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/ #Masks #Coronavirus #demask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
13. Farce mask: it's safe for only 20 minutes https://www.smh.com.au/national/farce-mask-its-safe-for-only-20-minutes-20030427-gdgnyo.html #masks #covid19
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
14. Masks: The Science & Myths https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/videos/mask-myths/ #Masks #myths #COVID19
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
15 Lets just check on what Fauci said on masks at the start... #fauic #fauciflu #Masks #YouLyingFauci https://t.co/L3QJdJ554g
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
@reseeit save thread
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
21. The ‘Hidden Curriculum’ of the Face-Mask Part 1 https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/10/the-hidden-curriculum-of-the-face-mask-part-1/?doing_wp_cron=1638039119.3918941020965576171875 Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
22. The ‘Hidden Curriculum’ of the Face-Mask, Part 2: The Politics of the Mask https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/2021/11/the-hidden-curriculum-of-the-face-mask-part-2-the-politics-of-the-mask/ Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
23. Face masks DO harm kids' development, landmark study shows https://mol.im/a/10247315 Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
24. Masks are Destroying the Development of Babies https://vernoncoleman.org/videos/masks-are-destroying-development-babies Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
25. Masking and vaccines have nothing to do with a pandemic or mitigating illness but rather establishing a system of absolute tyrannical control over the population as a de facto enslavement mechanism. https://politicalmoonshine.com/2021/07/17/united-we-stand-divided-we-fall-masked-we-submit-vaccinated-we-succumb Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
26. Lets talk About Masks https://genuineprospect.com/2021/04/24/lets-talk-about-masks/ Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
27. Dr Shillary Jones saying why not to wear a mask, before he changed his mind... https://t.me/wolfchannel2/7776 Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
28. Masks arent safe for kids https://genuineprospect.com/2021/07/01/masks-arent-safe-for-kids/ Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
29. Masks - the science and the myths https://rumble.com/vgk92l-masks-the-science-and-myths.html Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
30. Unmask the children A touching analysis of the psychological and physical damage caused by masks and an appeal to stop masks on children. https://wickedtruths.org/en/unmask-the-children Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
31. Stop Masks in Schools https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-masks-in-schools/ Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
32. Why are we wearing masks? https://fightingmonarch.com/2021/01/16/why-are-we-wearing-masks/ Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
33. Occult Ritual Transformation &Coronavirus: How Mask, Hand Washing, “Social Separation” Lockdowns Are Age-Old Occult Rituals Being Used to Initiate People Into New Global Order https://haveyenotread.com/occult-ritual-transformation-and-coronavirus/ #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
34. The Dangers of Masks…Mass Occult Ritual? https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2021/02/the-dangers-of-masksmass-occult-ritual/ #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
35. Masks: Ritual Occult Submission https://asenseofplacemagazine.com/masks-ritual-occult-submission/ #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
36. In the UK you dont have to wear a face covering. YOU decide if you are exempt and you dont have to show proof. Stand up to the mask bullies. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/face-coverings-when-to-wear-one-and-how-to-make-your-own #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
37. If you want an exemption card even though you dotn have to show it then they are here... all you have to say is I am exempt. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/903452/Exemption_from_face_covering_badge_for_mobile_phone.pdf #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual #exemption #maskexemption
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
38. Survivors may be particularly anxious about wearing a mask due to their trauma https://www.mind.org.uk/information-support/coronavirus/mask-anxiety-face-coverings-and-mental-health/ #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual #exemption #maskexemption
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
39. Masks Ritual Satanic #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual #exemption #maskexemption #satanic https://t.co/YkienRu8Iu
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
40 . Masks didnt work before but they are just a visual step to get you scared before the introduction of another lockdown. #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual #exemption #maskexemption #satanic https://t.co/MyecXXwxaJ
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
41. Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #ritual #exemption #maskexemption https://t.co/72OvFHNBWr
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
42. Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control https://t.co/bWXTIdZIRr
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
43. Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control #childabuse https://t.co/uQsaz4iyRK
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
44. Mask hypocrisy... #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control #childabuse https://t.co/ya4yINReIh
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
45. Mask Idiots #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control #childabuse #maskidiots https://t.co/pgq1mCxObe
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
46. Mask hypocrites... Show you are not a slave... dont wear a mask... they dont mean what they say, they say it to control you... Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control #childabuse #maskhypocrites https://t.co/F3pdLn4bih
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
47. Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control #childabuse #maskhypocrites https://t.co/F3pdLn4bih https://t.co/VDOUUUgP6t
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
48. Masks #masks #covidvariant #covidbullshit #maskbullshit #unmask #exemption #maskexemption #tyranny #control #childabuse #maskhypocrites https://t.co/Np3joTFVI2
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
49. @pingthread unroll mask thread, i am tired
@foxblog3 - thefoxblog
@rattibha
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Thread: Masks The mask covidian cult are starting to sound the alarm again and expand their cult programming to basically any respiratory illness in order to normalize their cult rituals. RT far & wide if you find this useful. #COVID19 #Masks #Science #TwitterFiles #lockdowns
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
I’d thought it would be informative to start a thread with much of but not all of the evidence that refutes their maniacal beliefs. I’ve only provided a small sample size over all but it’s a good start.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Unfortunately mask covidian cultists have come to believe that wearing a surgical mask is a great way to protect yourself and others from Flu, COVID and getting hit by a bus while walking alone down the street or even while driving alone.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
If you have a covidian cultist in your life please share the following information with them. Even though I highly doubt they will assimilate it and allow it to inform themselves moving forward, hey at least you tried.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
There is a common belief that N95 masks are better, you’ve seen them in public, tightly strapped to the faces of the fearful. I’m sure if we could see their face there would be a self satisfied smug look on them while they struggle to breathe. So let take a look at the evidence.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
STUDY 1: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31479137/ “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial Lewis J Radonovich Jr et al. JAMA. 2019”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study Objective: To compare the effect of N95 respirators vs medical masks for prevention of influenza and other viral respiratory infections among HCP. Design, setting, and participants: A cluster randomized pragmatic effectiveness study conducted at 137 outpatient study sites
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
at 7 US medical centers between September 2011 and May 2015, with final follow-up in June 2016. Each year for 4 years, during the 12-week period of peak viral respiratory illness, pairs of outpatient sites within each center were matched and randomly assigned to the N95 or mask.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Interventions: Overall, 1993 participants in 189 clusters were randomly assigned to wear N95 respirators (2512 HCP-seasons of observation) and 2058 in 191 clusters were randomly assigned to wear medical masks (2668 HCP-seasons) when near patients with respiratory illness.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Conclusions and relevance: Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE INCIDENCE OF LABORATORY-CONFIRMED INFLUENZA In case you are thinking that flu virus and SARS Cov 2 are different size wise and therefore cannot be compared, you are wrong. They are similar in size to the point of parody.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 2 “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 January 2010” https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-systematic-%20review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“We conducted a systematic review [Reference Moher 6] to investigate the evidence supporting the effectiveness of face masks in reducing influenza virus infection under controlled and natural conditions.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Our review highlights the limited evidence base supporting the efficacy or effectiveness of face masks to reduce influenza virus transmission.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“One concern over the use of face masks or respirators in healthcare settings is the potential for negative psychosocial impacts on patients and children in particular, especially in regions outside Asia where masks are not routinely worn.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Pandemic guidance provided by the World Health Organization for community settings advises that masks may be worn although effectiveness is uncertain particularly in open spaces [41].
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Other health agencies, such as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are not recommending masks in the community setting, with the exception of high-risk individuals who care for the sick or spend time in large crowds in areas affected by the pandemic [42]. “
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Wearing masks incorrectly may increase the risk of transmission.” INCREASE TRANSMISSION
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“In conclusion there remains a substantial gap in the scientific literature on the effectiveness of face masks to reduce transmission of influenza virus infection.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 3 Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Background: Health care workers outside surgical suites in Asia use surgical-type face masks commonly. Prevention of upper respiratory infection is one reason given, although evidence of effectiveness is lacking.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Methods: Health care workers in a tertiary care hospital in Japan were randomized into 2 groups: 1 that wore face masks and 1 that did not. They provided information about demographics, health habits, and quality of life. Participants recorded symptoms daily for 77 consecutive..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
days, starting in January 2008. Presence of a cold was determined based on a previously validated measure of self-reported symptoms. The number of colds between groups was compared, as were risk factors for experiencing cold symptoms.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Conclusion: Face mask use in health care workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds. A larger study is needed to definitively establish noninferiority of no mask use.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 4: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systemic review of the scientific evidence” “None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 5: https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567 “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Background: Conflicting recommendations exist related to which facial protection should be used by health care workers to prevent transmission of acute respiratory infections, including pandemic influenza. We performed a systematic review of both clinical and surrogate exposure
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“data comparing N95 respirators and surgical masks for the prevention of transmissible acute respiratory infections.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Methods: We searched various electronic databases and the grey literature for relevant studies published from January 1990 to December 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case–control studies that included data on health care workers wearing N95…
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
respirators and surgical masks to prevent acute respiratory infections were included in the meta-analysis.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Conclusion: Although N95 respirators appeared to have a protective advantage over surgical masks in laboratory settings, our meta-analysis showed that there were insufficient data to determine definitively whether N95 respirators are superior to surgical masks in protecting..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
health care workers against transmissible acute respiratory infections in clinical settings.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 6: “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Question: Is the use of N95 respirators or medical masks more effective in preventing influenza infection among outpatient health care personnel in close contact with patients with suspected respiratory illness?”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Findings: In this pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial involving 2862 health care personnel, there was no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among health care personnel with the use of N95 respirators (8.2%) vs medical masks (7.2%).
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Meaning: As worn by health care personnel in this trial, use of N95 respirators, compared with medical masks, in the outpatient setting resulted in no significant difference in the rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 7: Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1- 9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78)...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 8: “A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4420971/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cloth masks to medical masks in hospital healthcare workers (HCWs). The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between medical masks and cloth masks.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Participants: 1607 hospital HCWs aged ≥18 years working full-time in selected high-risk wards.” “Intervention: Hospital wards were randomised to: medical masks, cloth masks or a control group (usual practice, which included mask wearing)...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Participants used the mask on every shift for 4 consecutive weeks.” “Conclusions: This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention,..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Study 9: “Nonpharmaceutical Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Nonhealthcare Settings—Personal Protective and Environmental Measures” https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“In this review, we did not find evidence to support a protective effect of personal protective measures or environmental measures in reducing influenza transmission.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“We did not find evidence that surgical-type face masks are effective in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza transmission, either when worn by infected persons (source control) or by persons in the general community to reduce their susceptibility.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Now let’s look at some studies that show the negative health effects of mask wearing. The mask cult will have you believe that wearing something that inhibits your breathing all day is perfectly healthy, how could it possibly impact your health?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
1. [Effect of a surgical mask on six minute walking distance] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Introduction: Six minutes walking test (6MWT) is regularly used in pulmonology. To minimize the risk of cross-infection, some patients must wear surgical mask at rest and sometimes during exercise.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Aim of the study: To evaluate the effect of wearing a surgical mask during 6MWT in healthy subjects.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Material and method: It is a prospective study on 44 healthy subjects. After a first 6MWT for training, they performed randomly two 6MWT: with or without a surgical mask. Distance and dyspnea, heart rate and saturation variations were recorded.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Results: Distance was not modified by the mask (P=0.99). Dyspnea variation was significantly higher with surgical mask (+5.6 vs. +4.6; P<0.001) and the difference was clinically relevant. No difference was found for the variation of other parameters.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Conclusion: Wearing a surgical mask modifies significantly and clinically dyspnea without influencing walked distance.” Note: dyspnea means shortness of breath
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
2. “The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Background and purpose: Most patients with end-stage renal disease (ERSD) visiting our hospital for hemodialysis treatment during the SARS outbreak wore an N95 mask. Data on the physiological stress imposed by the wearing of N95 masks remains limited...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This study investigated the physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis (HD) on patients with ESRD.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Conclusion: Wearing an N95 mask for 4 hours during HD significantly reduced PaO2 and increased respiratory adverse effects in ESRD patients.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
3. “Respiratory consequences of N95-type Mask usage in pregnant healthcare workers-a controlled clinical study” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26579222/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Conclusions: Breathing through N95 mask materials have been shown to impede gaseous exchange and impose an additional workload on the metabolic system of pregnant healthcare workers, and this needs to be taken into consideration in guidelines for respirator use...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The benefits of using N95 mask to prevent serious emerging infectious diseases should be weighed against potential respiratory consequences associated with extended N95 respirator usage.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
4. “Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31159777/
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Background: Medical masks are commonly used in health care settings to protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from respiratory and other infections. Airborne respiratory pathogens may settle on the surface of used masks layers, resulting in contamination...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
The main aim of this study was to study the presence of viruses on the surface of medical masks.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
“Conclusion: Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self-contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use (> 6 h) and with higher rates of clinical contact...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use, and should consider guidance in high contact settings. Viruses were isolated from the upper sections of around 10% samples, but other sections of masks may also be contaminated...
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
HCWs should be aware of these risks in order to protect themselves and people around them.”
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
So I have provided 9 studies, many of which are meta-reviews of the literature on the efficacy or lack thereof of masking along with 4 studies indicating potentially negative health effects from wearing them.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
This is but a small sample size of the scientific literature that exists proving unequivocally that the use of masks to limit viral spread of respiratory viruses is not a viable intervention and in fact can make matters worse when it comes to viral spread..
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
and the health of the wearer. Ask yourself, in light of all the evidence against masking, why do governments and health professionals continue to push this unscientific, harmful, and Orwellian agenda on the world?
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
Loving the response. It has inspired me to do this on another topic. The Worldwide Lockdown. Please give me a follow for more writing and threads in the future. Let’s build something.
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
THREAD - HOW ZEYNEP TUFEKCI AND JEREMY HOWARD MASKED AMERICA Zeynep Tufekci and Jeremy Howard played a decisive role shifting CDC guidance and ushering in mask mandates across America. Zeynep’s role in the COVID story goes far deeper than most realize. 1/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
After three years of speculation, an authoritative gold-standard Cochrane review including results from 78 peer-reviewed RCTs confirmed that across populations, masks, regardless of type, made “little to no difference” in preventing COVID or flu. 2/ https://www.city-journal.org/new-cochrane-study-on-masks-and-covid
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
The Cochrane review seemed to settle the matter. Mask opponents had their trump card. But alas, the pro-mask establishment responded with a trump card of their own: an NYT op-ed by Zeynep Tufekci: “Here’s Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work” 3/ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/10/opinion/masks-work-cochrane-study.html
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
This new trump card was a disaster for mask opponents—the proverbial queen of spades—and it quickly went viral among mask devotees, newly reassured in the righteousness of their talismans, drowning out news of the Cochrane review itself. 4/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Yet Zeynep’s op-ed brought new attention to a lingering question: Where exactly did all these mask mandates come from? Why did the US CDC suddenly reverse its longstanding guidance and begin recommending masks for the first time in modern history in April 2020? 5/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Zeynep’s first article on COVID appeared Feb 27, 2020, in which she stressed the importance of getting ready for major disruptions during COVID in order to “flatten the curve.” At the time, her advice on masks followed the public health establishment. 6/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/preparing-for-coronavirus-to-strike-the-u-s/ https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/preparing-for-coronavirus-to-strike-the-u-s/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Over the next few days, Zeynep’s views on masking apparently changed dramatically, and this about-face would have a profound impact on all Americans. As NYT wrote, her writing in the next few days was the “tipping point” changing CDC’s masking guidance. 7/ https://nytimes.com/2020/08/23/business/media/how-zeynep-tufekci-keeps-getting-the-big-things-right.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/23/business/media/how-zeynep-tufekci-keeps-getting-the-big-things-right.html
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Around this time, Zeynep began working with Howard, who founded the American branch of #Masks4All. Howard is a WEF AI expert and something of a Sinophile who repeatedly advocated for the use of information and expertise from China during COVID. 8/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
It’s not entirely clear how they began working together. Zeynep and Howard’s first public interaction regarding COVID was when Howard cited Zeynep as a contributor to his viral March 9, 2020 article encouraging shutdowns on China’s example. 9/ https://fast.ai/posts/2020-03-09-coronavirus.html https://www.fast.ai/posts/2020-03-09-coronavirus.html
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Howard says he’d been inspired by a viral video posted on March 14, 2020, by Petr Ludwig, a founder of the original #Masks4All movement in the Czech Republic, in which Ludwig encouraged everyone to wear homemade masks. 10/ https://youtube.com/watch?v=K5xy2n941jM… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5xy2n941jM
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
The internationalization of #Masks4All was based on the story that universal adoption of homemade masks in the Czech Republic had “slowed the spread” of COVID cases, preventing them from “growing exponentially” as they had in the rest of the world. 11/ https://youtu.be/HhNo_IOPOtU
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
This story was always false, if not a lie. Today, the Czech Republic is among the 10 worst countries in the world in terms of its recorded number of “COVID deaths.” Yet this falsehood was the impetus for #Masks4All and soon a basis for mask mandates across the world. 12/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
With the assistance of the WEF Young Global Leaders, Howard published “Simple DIY masks could help flatten the curve. We should all wear them in public.” in WaPo, gushing about the Czech Republic’s mask mandate and citing Chinese CDC Director George Gao. 13/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
We see Gao’s emphasis on “droplets” reflected throughout Howard and Zeynep’s work. For example, the “sources” section of the official #Masks4All website prominently features another quote on droplets from Gao: 14/ https://masks4all.org/sources
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Howard then went on a media blitz. As Howard tells it, his GMA interview, in which he was joined by Fauci, was monumental in that it was the first time Fauci had ever come to advise mask use by the American public. GMA also repeated Gao’s quote on masks preventing “droplets”. 15/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Howard then discussed masking with Senator Pat Toomey, who briefed the CDC and President Trump. The next day, Trump announced that universal masking might be needed. 16/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Howard then began making inroads at the CDC, which was still reluctant to reverse its longstanding guidance on masks because “the science wasn’t strong enough.” So Howard “tried to ratchet up the public pressure.” 17/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Zeynep and Howard submitted their preprint, an “interdisciplinary narrative review of the literature on the role of face masks in reducing COVID-19 transmission,” soon the most-viewed paper of all time on http://preprints.org. It begins: 18/ https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118 http://preprints.org. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
In their paper, Zeynep and Howard argued that “everyone, adults and children, should wear masks,” citing as a major benefit masks’ potential to “shape new societal behaviors” as “a visible signal and reminder of the pandemic.” 19/ https://pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
The CDC officially reversed its mask guidance on April 3, 2020, and Zeynep and Howard’s preprint was a factor. Zeynep and Howard then turned their focus toward getting states to mandate masks. 20/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
USA Today published Zeynep and Howard’s op-ed, titled “Over 100 health leaders to governors: Require masks to help contain the coronavirus,” in which they wrote it was necessary to have “80% of the population wearing masks to stop the spread.” 21/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/05/14/require-masks-stop-coronavirus-spread-over-100-health-leaders-column/5182076002/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Over the next three years, mask use exceeded 80% of the population in countless states and countries, but in no instance did it “stop the spread” of COVID. 22/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Howard had no relevant credentials in the field, but he was forceful. When virologist Angela Rasmussen questioned his analysis, Howard went so far as to email her boss to demand a “public retraction” of her critique. 23/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Zeynep and Howard were invited to present their masking preprint and advise the WHO. When WHO officials expressed concern that people wearing masks might start behaving recklessly, Zeynep advised them, “No, listen, I’m a sociologist, I know that’s not true.” 24/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
In Zeynep’s work, we see this repeated insistence that masks have no “plausible” downsides. Zeynep claimed the WHO “went out of their way to inflate a harms list,” and decried doctors focused on “alleged ‘harms’” which she believed to be “ridiculous.” 25/ https://kelleyk.substack.com/p/where-us-mask-rhetoric-went-wrong
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Though it’s always been well known that COVID poses virtually no risk to schoolchildren, Zeynep repeatedly advocated child masking, urging school mask mandates on the false basis “even the vaccinated may pose a danger to unvaccinated children.” 26/ https://nytimes.com/2021/07/24/opinion/coronavius-vaccine-masks.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/24/opinion/coronavius-vaccine-masks.html
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Zeynep’s indifference to harms during the response to COVID wasn’t limited to masking. Though the policy had no precedent in the modern western world until Xi’s lockdown of Wuhan and wasn’t part of any pandemic plan, Zeynep argued the US “should be in full lockdown.” 27/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Later, Zeynep wrote about "3 Ways the Pandemic Has Made the World Better," citing “mRNA vaccines,” new “digital infrastructure,” and the fact we’d “unleashed the true spirit of peer review and open science” as reasons to be thankful for COVID. 28/ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/03/three-ways-pandemic-has-bettered-world/618320/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Like Matt Pottinger, Zeynep pushed for more COVID interventions in part based on information from China, though she simultaneously fashions herself as something of a China hawk and supports the “lab leak theory” of COVID’s origins. 29/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/matt-pottinger-the-intelligence-agent
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Despite knowing that “no scientist in China can operate truly freely,” when it came to arguing in favor of more COVID interventions, Zeynep repeatedly advocated the use of information from Chinese scientists, apparently without questioning any of it. 30/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Eg, Zeynep advocated for increased ventilator use in early March 2020 based on information from Chinese scientists, noting in a widely-shared tweet that “Chinese scientists” had advised “many COVID-19 patients need to stay on mechanical ventilators as long as four weeks.” 31/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Indeed, in journal articles, “Chinese expert consensus” had advised ventilators as the “first choice” for COVID. This advice was slurped up by the WHO and spat out all over the world in the WHO’s initial guidance on ventilators for COVID patients. 32/ https://who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
This guidance proved extremely deadly. JAMA later revealed a 97.2% mortality rate among those over 65 put on ventilators in accordance with initial WHO guidance. Overall, mortality among COVID patients in NY hospitals fell over 2/3 after spring 2020. 33/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2765184
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
The initial ventilator guidance from Chinese scientists led to countless thousands of deaths. Yet despite having specifically disseminated this guidance—while knowing “no scientist in China can operate truly freely”—Zeynep never apologized or acknowledged the error. 34/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Finally, Zeynep’s op-ed on the recent Cochrane review. The title is a lie, given it specifically calls for scientists to “continue to collect data on mask wearing.” 35/ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/10/opinion/masks-work-cochrane-study.html
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Zeynep relies on a selection of clinical studies, none of which are RCTs; this same level of evidence would show that any number of silly things work against COVID, from ginseng to magnesium to melatonin to fish oil. 36/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Zeynep cites a trial from Bangladesh which found an 11% reduction in COVID cases when villagers were given masks, without disclosing a re-analysis that found no benefit and attributed that finding to bias. 37/ https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-022-06704-z
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Glaringly, Zeynep apparently didn’t disclose her advocacy or conflicting narrative review concluding “everyone, adults and children,” should wear masks when she elicited Cochrane’s EIC’s clarification of the wording of the review’s conclusion. 38/ https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/unmasking-the-new-york-times-zeynep
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Regarding Zeynep and Howard’s masking of America, there are only two possibilities—neither good. The first is it was essentially scripted theater—a pretext for actions that a network of elites was planning to take anyway, unbeknownst to the public. 39/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
The second possibility is that it really was this easy for ambitious activists with no relevant expertise to convince institutional leaders to reverse longstanding public health guidance—who then spent years closing their ears to all contrary evidence. 40/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Either way, Zeynep pushed falsehoods and harmful policies based on info from China. She and Howard played a decisive role in the mask mandates that so intimately affected every American, for dubious reasons like “shaping new societal norms.” /end https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/how-zeynep-tufekci-and-jeremy-howard
@A1an_M - Alan
A thread 🧵 Last week I posted the tweet below and promised to post up some evidence to back up these statements 1/
@A1an_M - Alan
The first tweet with evidence, regarding the lack of deadliness of COVID for most people is here: 2/
@A1an_M - Alan
In this thread I'm going to talk about masks. "Masks aren't effective in preventing virus spread" This will be a long thread so here is the TL; DR version: ✴️At a population level, masks have not been shown to be an effective intervention for respiratory viruses; 3/
@A1an_M - Alan
✴️This was true before and during the COVID pandemic and will likely remain true afterwards ✴️Public health authorities began the pandemic giving the correct advice ✴️The advice changed in Jul 2020 - for POLITICAL reasons ✴️The media at best failed to provide a balanced view...4/
@A1an_M - Alan
✴️and at worst was an active participant in making universal mask-wearing happen. ✴️Mask wearing, aside from playing a role in politics also has important psychological effects at an individual and group level. OK, on with the detail 5/
@A1an_M - Alan
At the very beginning of the pandemic, the advice was either that they were not necessary, would have little impact if used, or that they should not be used. For example Anthony Fauci when asked in Feb 2020 if they were needed : "Absolutely not". 6/
@A1an_M - Alan
And in March 2020, UK Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty: “In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that.” 7/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-uk-news-professor-chris-whitty-no-masks-advice-a9374086.html
@A1an_M - Alan
And if we look at the WHO's pandemic guidelines published in autumn 2019, mask wearing is only recommended during pandemics and epidemics for the symptomatic (note also some of the "not recommended in any circumstances" items which we also ended up doing): 8/
@A1an_M - Alan
So during the period when the pandemic was at its first peak in April 2020, mask wearing was voluntary in shops and other indoor public spaces. I remember well visiting my local Tesco and Morrisons on a daily basis during this time, seeing the same unmasked staff, fit & well 9/
@A1an_M - Alan
week after week. However in June, the government made face covering mandatory on public transport and in healthcare settings and on July 24th, with COVID cases and deaths at very low levels, they extended this to shops and supermarkets 10/ https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/face-coverings-to-be-mandatory-in-shops-and-supermarkets-from-24-july
@A1an_M - Alan
In the government's announcement, the Health Secretary says that effectively this was being done for political and psychological reasons (arguably in an attempt to compensate for the government's fear campaign on the population a few months earlier) 11/
@A1an_M - Alan
Certainly the science about masks hadn't changed at this time. Indeed a study done in Denmark in Apr/May 2020 but whose publication was delayed for several months, found no statistical difference in COVID infection between masked & unmasked. 12/ https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6817:
@A1an_M - Alan
And even the Health Secretary's July 24th statement about introducing masks to shops and supermarkets makes no promise about them being effective in reducing virus spread (not that a Matt Hancock promise would be worth much anyway) 13/:
@A1an_M - Alan
And finally, the BBC, the home of impartial journalism itself, broadcast on Newsnight that the WHO eventually backed mask mandates due to "political lobbying", not due any new science or change in its view of their effectiveness 14/ https://youtu.be/XnRqUMxjvR4
@A1an_M - Alan
While there is some evidence to suggest public health authorities were initially reluctant to recommend masks at population level due to concerns that this might result in shortages for health care workers, it seems clear that the senior leadership knew that while masks... 15/
@A1an_M - Alan
might help in the case of symptomatic individuals and reduce the risk of them spreading the virus, there was little evidence of any benefit of wider use at population level. So in summary, mask mandates were a political decision, not a public health one. 16/
@A1an_M - Alan
Mask mandates in England remained in force until January 2022 at which point they were withdrawn in most settings, although they remained in use in some situations, notably healthcare settings. The rules remained in Scotland and Wales for longer. https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o163 17/
@A1an_M - Alan
As mentioned previously, the scientific literature pre COVID provided little support for mask wearing at a population level. During the COVID pandemic itself there were numerous new studies on the subject, for example this one 18/
@A1an_M - Alan
which found that mask madates at a large London hospital had no discernible effect on hospital-acquired Covid cases. There was also a lot of excitement about a study done in Bangladesh which supposedly found masks to be effective... 19/ https://poverty-action.org/sites/default/files/publications/Mask_RCT____Symptomatic_Seropositivity_083121.pdf
@A1an_M - Alan
...but methodological criticisms suggested its findings were unreliable. 20/ https://dailysceptic.org/2021/09/03/the-bangladesh-mask-study-is-a-missed-opportunity
@A1an_M - Alan
However then the widely-respected Cochrane Library published a review of all recent research into the effectiveness of mask wearing on respiratory virus control, including the large number of RCT studies done in the COVID era. 21/ https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full
@A1an_M - Alan
This publication led to an explosion of "fact checking" stories supposedly debunking the idea that Cochrane had concluded that "masks don't work". Even Cochrane itself published a statement clarifying what had been found, much to the anger of the lead author. 23/
@A1an_M - Alan
And if you look more widely at media coverage of the mask issue, there is very clear ongoing support for mask wearing. For example stories supporting mask wearing were given prominence, like this one 24/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57636360
@A1an_M - Alan
And whenever "debunking" was done, it was always done on stories suggesting masks had no benefit or were harmful, like this one: 25/ https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/53108405
@A1an_M - Alan
Or this one: 26/ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/feb/27/dont-believe-those-who-claim-science-proves-masks-dont-work
@A1an_M - Alan
And when conflict occurred between the masked, and the unmasked, the media often portrayed the unmasked as extremists even though, as we have seen, there is plenty of evidence the "anti-maskers" have a scientific point 27/: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-53477121
@A1an_M - Alan
So we have a situation where the science provides little support for mask wearing, the scientists themselves changed their advice only for political reasons but the media provides little nuance about the debate and instead pushes the government position du jour relentlessly 28/
@A1an_M - Alan
I'm going to end this thread by talking a little about what, in my view, were the real reasons for the change in advice in mid 2020. Despite what Matt Hancock says, I don't think this was anything to do with trying to coax people back out to the shops 29/
@A1an_M - Alan
In fact the University of North Carolina Professor, occasional New York Times contributor and key figure in influencing the US CDC into changing its mask advice in April 2020, summed the real reason up rather well: 30/ https://t.co/iTiqjutECM
@A1an_M - Alan
Masks were introduced at a time when cases and deaths were at a low (in the UK) or were about to peak and decline (in the US) in order to 1) remind people there was still a pandemic 2) create a sense of community amongst the rule-followers and... 31/
@A1an_M - Alan
create a conducive environment for future control measures. You might innocently say "well what's wrong with that? We were in a pandemic! We needed people to feel fear". But from my previous thread, we know that this virus was only a deadly threat to a tiny percentage... 32/
@A1an_M - Alan
of people. So the continuation of masks was done for political reasons, yes, but not benign political reasons. In my view it was done to maintain fear, ensure the "pandemic" lasted far longer than it needed to, and provide the backdrop for the rollout of universal vaccines. 33/
@A1an_M - Alan
Masks also fulfilled a psychological need for many who had essentially been hypnotised as part of a "mass formation" by the pandemic propaganda spread by the mass media. As Prof Mattias Desmet describes here: 34/ https://t.co/kzQbkKXnI8
@A1an_M - Alan
I talk more about how the pandemic response looks very much like a classic "mass formation" in these threads 35/ https://t.co/jANcprDIEv
@A1an_M - Alan
Masks. In summary: ✴️Don't work at population level for respiratory epidemics. Science (not The Science) says so. ✴️Were introduced for political & psychological reasons ✴️Media didn't provide balanced coverage of the argument due to political pressure or their own activism.36/36
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
THREAD: The Making of a Plandemic How the Satanic Cabal pulled off the greatest hoax in history, and why it eventually backfired, exposing their Great Reset agenda, and leading to a global Great Awakening.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
In late 2019, reports emerged of a new virus in China. Social media and mainstream media ramped up the fear with alarming (but obviously staged) videos of people collapsing in the street.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
On 14 Jan 2020, the WHO said there was no evidence of human-human transmission and insisted borders should remain open. When President Trump ignored this WHO misinformation, and closed the US borders anyway, he was accused of racism by Democrats and mainstream media.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
While President Trump was trying to reduce travel and minimise rates of infection, Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats were calling him a racist and encouraging tourists to visit Chinatown.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
The virus was released during the Oct 2019 Military World Games in Wuhan. 10,000+ attendees from 100+ countries were present. The attendees returned home, seeding the virus globally. China banned domestic travel from Wuhan, but ensured international travel remained open.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
In March 2020, when the virus was successfully seeded globally, the WHO declared a worldwide pandemic and advised closure of international borders. Events so far closely resembled Event 201, a pandemic exercise conducted in 2019 by John Hopkins Center, the WEF, and Bill Gates.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
It soon became clear the virus wasn't as deadly as claimed. People didn’t drop dead in the street as videos from China suggested. It mostly affected the elderly and those with co-morbidities, like a flu. Hospitals were empty. The Cabal had to find new ways to ramp up the deaths.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
1. They forced infected people into nursing homes. In the USA, this occurred in many Democrat states. It also occurred in the UK, Ireland, and other countries. Vulnerable elderly people were deliberately infected with the virus.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
2. They weakened everyone’s immune system with lockdowns and muzzle mandates. Lack of fresh air, exercise, sunlight (Vitamin-D), and being forced to breath through a dirty rag, made people more susceptible to infection. They knew masks don’t block airborne viruses.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
3. They banned effective treatments like HCQ and Ivermectin. They also downplayed or refused to discuss the benefits of zinc, Vitamin-C, Vitamin-D, sunlight, fresh air, exercise, and healthy food.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
4. They implemented deadly COVID “treatments" like Remdesivir plus intubation, which actually increase the probability of dying. And they cancelled or postponed regular treatment and screenings for cancer and other diseases.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
Alongside those measures to increase the death toll, mainstream media (funded by Big Pharma) drove the pandemic narrative with 24x7 scaremongering. But even those measures weren't enough to create the desired mortality so they also exaggerated deaths using the following methods:
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
1. Hospitals were financially incentivized to state COVID as a cause of death, regardless of whether the patient actually died from COVID.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
2. They changed the normal flu reporting method and instead counted deaths WITH a positive PCR test. Anyone who dies from from flu, stroke, cancer, old age etc. is given a PCR test. If the result is positive, they record a "COVID death” regardless of the actual cause of death.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
3. Most of those positives are false positives, because they run the PCR tests at 40-45 cycles. Using this new measurement technique, similar numbers would die every year WITH colds and flus.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
Unleashing this plandemic achieved several objectives for the Cabal: 1. Mandatory Regular “Vaccination” The injections advanced their depopulation agenda while generating profit for Big Pharma. This is discussed in more detail in the thread below: https://t.co/Ufz3W5yeF7
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
THREAD: The Spike Protein is the Bioweapon This thread discusses the COVID-19 spike protein. It was engineered through gain-of-function experiments in a Cabal biolab. There are two delivery vectors for the spike protein bioweapon. The virus. And the more deadly injection.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
2. Steal the 2020 Election The plandemic wrecked Trump’s booming economy and allowed MSM to blame him for every death. It gave Dems an excuse to mail millions of ballots to be harvested, while eliminating signature matching and restricting observers from the counting process.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
3. The Great Reset The Cabal controls govts, corporations, religions, and media through bribery, extortion and honey pots (Epstein Island). Their Great Reset agenda seeks to subjugate the masses and ensure everyone is monitored, injected, and reliant on their financial system.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
Fortunately for humanity, a global alliance of patriots was aware of the Cabal plan. The Cabal likes to work in the shadows, but by unleashing their plandemic they were placed in the spotlight. The thread below discusses one way the agenda was thwarted: https://t.co/E4HJOjGHRa
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
THREAD: Why President Trump Pushed the "Vaccine" President Trump used Operation Warp Speed to force the Cabal to deploy their bioweapon injections before they were fully prepared. If he hadn't done this, the following would have happened:
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
The fact that this thread is allowed on Twitter (thanks Elon) is testament to the Cabal’s ultimate failure. When President Trump was elected in 2016, he disrupted the Cabal’s 16-year plan to destroy the world. Instead of a Great Reset, we're in the midst of a Great Awakening.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
Every day, millions of global patriots on Twitter, other social media sites, and independent media, are openly discussing these topics. We see the Cabal now. We know who they are. We know what they did. The plandemic is only one of their evil acts. Many others are being exposed.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
The Great Awakening can't be stopped. It can only grow. Once a person wakes up, they can’t be put back to sleep. Propaganda no longer has the power to brainwash the masses. Each new fake news narrative pushed by the Cabal is instantly torn apart by millions of digital warriors.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
When Tucker moved to Twitter, his viewers increased 10X and Fox lost 30% of its audience. Propaganda rags like CNN and MSNBC have lost most of their audience. Mainstream media is dying. The Great Reset agenda is crumbling, overtaken by the Great Awakening. WE ARE THE NEWS NOW.
@TwinTowerCity - Twin Tower City ⭐⭐⭐
LONG FORM SUMMARY OF THIS THREAD The original Cabal plan was to shut down the world for 10+ years while they prepared sufficient stocks of the bioweapon injections. Then they would introduce the "fully tested and approved vaccines" and make them 100% mandatory. The planned ten-year lockdown, economic collapse, martial law, and food/energy shortages would kill hundreds of millions through disease and starvation. Then the injections would finish off most of the remaining weakened populace. The goal of the Cabal was to reduce the global population to 500 million, as written on the Georgia Guidestones. This is all part of their Great Reset agenda to create a globalist communist New World Order, where everyone is tracked, monitored, injected, and completely reliant on The State (following the CCP model). The CCP and Cabal have infiltrated most governments and corporations around the world. They control the mainstream media and world leaders through bribery, blackmail, honeypots etc. They also control major global organizations like the WHO, IMF, World Bank etc. to ensure the entire world adheres to their narrative. But President Trump outplayed them. He knew the enemy's gameplan, so he used Operation Warp Speed to force them to accelerate their plans and deploy the plandemic before they were ready. The Cabal couldn't mandate their experimental injections because they hadn't completed long term testing and approval. They didn't have sufficient supply to inject everyone with the bioweapon, so most people got saline. Because the "vaccine" was made available quickly, this destroyed the Cabal's plan for a ten-year global lockdown. President Trump also spent his first term dismantling trust in the mainstream media. He baited the Cabal into relentlessly attacking him with made-up stories that always ended up being exposed as fake news. Faith in the mainstream media is at all time lows. Simultaneously, President Trump promoted alternative/independent media sources. This strategy, alongside the Patriot Intelligence Board project, means enough people can now see through the MSM propaganda, ensuring that the Cabal narratives have become unsustainable. The Cabal leaders prefer to hide in the shadows, but by deploying the plandemic before they were fully prepared, they were forced into the spotlight. Their plan was exposed to an increasingly awakened population. President Trump saved the lives of billions, and placed the globalist leaders on center stage where we can all see them. He let them think they got away with stealing the election, and he placed P-Pete, a senile child sniffer, into the spotlight to further weaken the Democrat party. President Trump took these actions to SHOW people what life would be like under a one-world fascist/communist dictatorship. Under P-Pete we've had inflation, recession, food/energy shortages, record gas prices, no baby formula, Ukraine war, stock market collapse, Afghanistan mess etc. We saw how the Cabal suppressed cures like HCQ and Ivermectin. And how they released the Chinavirus with the help of the CCP in Wuhan. We saw how they forced infected people into nursing homes to pump up the death toll. And how they used fake statistics and PCR tests to inflate the real death count. We saw how they used COVID to justify mail-in ballot fraud. And how they use Antifa/BLM to riot, loot, burn and terrorize the country. We saw how they lied relentlessly about the "100% safe and effective vaccine" but still forced injected people to wear muzzles anyway. And we see how they're flooding the country with illegal migrants, while denouncing voter ID, and saying illegals don't need to be tested for COVID. President Trump also also exposed the insecure voting machines. He showed how the Cabal uses fake news and fake impeachments to build false narratives. And how they weaponize the DOJ and FBI against the people. President Trump exposed the enemy. So now, every time the Cabal releases some new piece of propaganda, it's immediately torn apart and debunked all over social media by millions of anons. So their Great Reset agenda is crumbling before their eyes, overtaken by The Great Awakening. Trump’s presidency is a military operation. He forced the Cabal out of the shadows, motivating the people to rise up against tyranny worldwide. This is all part of The Great Awakening. It had to happen this way. Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing.
@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS
How the universal scientific consensus that masks do not prevent respiratory viruses became "misinformation", in just a few short months In 2019, WHO published a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of face masks for the prevention of influenza, involving ten high-quality studies with more than 6000 participants. Its conclusion: "There was no evidence that face masks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza." [1] In May 2020, CDC conducted its own systematic review and meta-analysis, this time of fourteen high-quality studies. Its conclusion: "Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza." [2] In early 2020, CDC and WHO were discouraging mask-wearing, calling it ineffective. However, by April through June 2020, advice had reversed and masks became recommended. Here's CNN [3]: In other words, there was universal scientific consensus pre-April 2020 that masks did not work. But, post-April 2020, what had once been scientific consensus had suddenly become "misinformation". How does something like that happen? How does scientific consensus become "misinformation" within just a few months, without any change in the actual science? This is a gravely serious question that must be answered. References: [1] https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf [2] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article [3] https://cnn.com/2020/06/25/health/face-mask-guidance-covid-19/index.html
@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine
1/n 🧵Comment le consensus scientifique universel selon lequel les masques ne préviennent pas les virus respiratoires est devenu en quelques mois une « désinformation »
@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine
2/n En 2019, l'OMS a publié une revue systématique et une méta-analyse sur l'utilisation de masques faciaux pour la prévention de la grippe, impliquant dix études de haute qualité portant sur plus de 6 000 participants. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf
@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine
3/n En mai 2020, le CDC a mené sa propre revue systématique et méta-analyse, cette fois de quatorze études de haute qualité. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article
@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine
4/n Début 2020, les CDC et l’OMS décourageaient le port du masque, le qualifiant d’inefficace. Cependant, d’avril à juin 2020, les conseils se sont inversés et les masques sont devenus recommandés. Voici CNN https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/25/health/face-mask-guidance-covid-19/index.html
@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine
5/n En d’autres termes, avant avril 2020, il existait un consensus scientifique universel selon lequel les masques ne fonctionnaient pas. Mais après avril 2020, ce qui était autrefois un consensus scientifique est soudainement devenu une « désinformation ».
@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine
6/n Comment le consensus scientifique peut-il se transformer en « désinformation » en quelques mois seulement, sans aucun changement dans la science elle-même ? C’est une question très sérieuse à laquelle il faut répondre. https://x.com/kevinnbass/status/1695924864581025861?s=12
@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS
WHO found that masks do not work in 2019: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf CDC found that masks do not work in 2020: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article Cochrane found that masks do not work in 2022: https://cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses Why are we still debating masks?
@justin_hart - Justin Hart
If you watch one video on Covid today, make it this one. I’m not usually conspiratorially-minded, but this compilation makes you stop and think….
@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS
WHO found that masks do not work in 2019: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329438/9789241516839-eng.pdf CDC found that masks do not work in 2020: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article Cochrane found that masks do not work in 2022: https://cochrane.org/CD006207/ARI_do-physical-measures-such-hand-washing-or-wearing-masks-stop-or-slow-down-spread-respiratory-viruses Why do some places still have mask mandates?
@covidisairborne - #COVIDisAirborne
📹 October 2019: ‘Event 201’, a pandemic exercise with a fictional novel coronavirus that spreads through the air. Among the participants: @DrMikeRyan. Three months later, a real coronavirus is rapidly spreading, but the @WHO hides and denies that this coronavirus is airborne.
@covidisairborne - #COVIDisAirborne
Source video ‘Event 201’: https://youtu.be/Vm1-DnxRiPM?si=Cbcu79wO9qp9PCrE
@covidisairborne - #COVIDisAirborne
Oct. 2019, @DrMikeRyan about the pandemic exercise with an *airborne coronavirus*: “addresses real & critical threats.” “respiratory pathogens are often transmitted by asymptomatic persons. They spread fast.” Then why @WHO’s airborne denial when the exercise became a reality? https://t.co/13bdAMfu3M
@5dme81 - 5DME81
💥💥KABOOM💥💥We asked for Proof that the virus actually exists. And the Proof was that the virus does NOT exist. 📢📢The video was removed by all social media. https://t.co/fyALcsSJTM
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is now comfortable telling you the truth about the government's lack of authority to enforce mandates: "Government had no capacity to enforce any of this [mandates]. You must wear a mask. People wore masks in New York. If they said 'I'm not wearing a mask' there was nothing I could do about it. You must close your private business. 'I won't'. There was nothing I could really do about it. It was really all voluntary. It was extraordinary when you think about it. That society acted with that uniformity voluntarily. Because I had no enforcement capacity. So you have a reduced trust in government." Yes, people have a tendency to distrust the government after learning they were lied to for years. Unless you're a Stockholm Syndrome Democrat.
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
Thank you to the people who always credit when they share like @_johnnymaga
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
Yes that was Leana Wen that Cuomo was talking to. She deserved her own clip:
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
Hot off the presses: https://immunetothesystem.com/2024/05/07/disgraced-former-new-york-mayor-says-the-quiet-part-out-loud-about-the-scamdemic/
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
Fauci himself telling you why masks do not work: https://t.co/PGOXf0BXPk
@EricAbbenante - Eric Abbenante
@mazemoore - MAZE
If they were smart they would make Fauci watch this video. It’s all here. https://t.co/9geDGMxObh
@mazemoore - MAZE
This is one of my most favorite videos. I think it really gives a good look at the crazy mass psychosis that took place during the pandemic. Hopefully eyes have been opened. https://t.co/SOIPX6sy2F
@RealPizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe
Do you remember when these Doctors tried to warn us about covid but MSM hid the video from the world? Sharing it would get you banned? Wild times. https://t.co/f1wGWM4JDR
@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch
This video I posted on Facebook last night just got TAKEN DOWN after amassing over 1.2 million views for “misinformation.” Watch till end and you’ll know exactly why. https://t.co/LRBNpnwO9S
@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch
Dude. I just posted this video on Facebook - and after it amassed over 2.7 million views they removed it for “misinformation.” Watch it till the end and you’ll know exactly why. https://t.co/n50JRVBEPP
@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie
Here's the video I made in 2021, which actually does show people being forcibly vaxxed. https://t.co/MGkxNWXblw
@SHomburg - Stefan Homburg
🇱🇷This NEW video is shadowbanned on YT YouTube does not want you to see what our whistle-blower found. Therefore, I upload the video here. Retweets are most welcome! @AlexBerenson @DrJBhattacharya @MartinKulldorff @FatEmperor @efenigson @NickHudsonCT @P_McCulloughMD
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
The next time someone suggests you wear a ‘mask’…show them this video of Dr. Fauci called, ‘Cameras off, Mask off’… https://t.co/LEMVjr61VY
@A1an_M - Alan
During the coronapanic it was routine for those of us in the sceptic camp to be attacked online for being conspiracy theorists and for us to be pestered by the Big Pharma apologists to provide "references" to prove our points (as well as being censored and cancelled by people working for our own government). No reference was ever good enough for them of course, but during that time I built up a huge archive of impeccably sourced information pointing directly to the whole thing being a massive scam. Where possible I'd go back and analyse the source data, rather than rely on a newspaper article or some third-hand commentator. I thought I'd collect together the top few pieces of evidence and put them in a thread here for future reference in an attempt to make sure the whole thing doesn't get brushed under the carpet under the banner of "It was all Tony Fauci's fault for doing gain of function research". The scandal is so much bigger and wider than that. So here it is 🧵: 1/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 1 - Prof John Ioannidis estimates of the Infection Fatality Rate of COVID. John Ioannidis, world-leading epidemiologist from Stanford (or he was at that time, his name was soon dragged through the mud), used seroprevalence data (indicating how many people had been exposed to SARS-COV-2) from studies around the world (32 different locations) to estimate the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 (how many people will die on average in a group of people infected with the virus). He concluded that the median infection fatality rate was 0.27% and that for people under 70, the median was 0.05% (1 in 2,000), showing that the virus was overwhelmingly a risk only to the elderly and even then, little more of a risk than seasonal influenza. (As a comparison, the IFR of seasonal influenza is about 1 in 1,000 (0.1%) across all age groups). These rates (from the real world) were far lower than those used in Imperial College modelling and quoted in the media by politicians. An early indication that the whole thing was being overblown. And these estimates were produced very early on in the "pandemic" before the virus had mutated to become even less deadly. Ioannidis study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v3 2/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 2 - the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship Further evidence that SARS-COV-2 was primarily a threat only to the very elderly was provided by the outcomes for passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship. A passenger who had been on the ship and disembarked in Hong Kong subsequently tested positive for COVID-19 and, as a result, the ship was quarantined and passengers and crew stayed on board rather than disembarking in Japan. This gave an opportunity to study the behaviour of the virus in a real life "petri-dish" with thousands of people in close proximity being exposed to the virus. There were 3,711 passengers and crew on the Diamond Princess. Median age 58. Everyone on board had a PCR test (eventually) 619 out of 3,711 tested positive (17%), of whom 301 had symptoms and 318 had no symptoms. There were 7 deaths (6 in the 70-79 age group, 1 in the over 80 age group). So even in a very elderly cohort of people, whom we must assume were all exposed to the virus, only 0.18% of people died. We could also infer that there must have been existing immunity to the virus in this population, given how few tested positive, and how few of those developed symptoms. Link to study: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.12.2000256 Link to Daily Sceptic analysis: https://dailysceptic.org/2021/03/27/the-diamond-princess-told-us-about-pre-existing-immunity-asymptomatic-infection-and-the-infection-fatality-rate-why-were-those-lessons-ignored/ 3/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 3 - ONS data from Freedom of Information requests ONS data gradually became more and more politicised during the coronapanic, and therefore less and less useful, but the data it gave in response to FOI requests in 2020 was actually quite useful. For example this analysis of the age breakdown of those who died following a positive COVID test in 2020 in England and Wales. It showed once again the extent to which this virus was primarily a threat to the very elderly, with 84% of victims over the age of 70 (and also, only 9 victims under the age of 15). Again, consistent with the earlier Ioannidis analysis. Other FOI requests revealed that the mean age of those who died with COVID was over 80, and that, of the 80,000+ deaths recorded "with COVID" in 2020, only 9,000 listed COVID as the sole cause of death on the death certificate - the overwhelming majority of deaths involved at least one other comorbidity. This data also made it possible to compare the age distribution of deaths with COVID in 2020, with deaths from all causes in 2019, and this analysis revealed that if you were under the age of 75, you were more likely to die of any cause, than with COVID. So these three analyses showed that, from an early date, it was clear that SARS-COV-2 was not the deadly threat to everyone it was portrayed to be. ONS FOI links: https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsfromcovid19byageband https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/averageageofthosewhohaddiedwithcovid19 https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/deathsfromcovid19withnootherunderlyingcauses 4/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 4 - Mask Ineffectiveness In July 2020 there was a sudden turnaround in recommendations for mask wearing amongst the general population. Prior to this date, there had been a consensus that this was neither necessary nor desirable. But suddenly that all changed. The science hadn't changed, there was a randomly controlled trial conducted in Denmark in April/May 2020 which found no statistically significant difference in infections between mask-wearing and non-mask wearing groups. And subsequent studies reviewed by the Cochrane Library found the same. But what had changed was "political lobbying" with the WHO to change their guidance on masks, as the BBC revealed in a rare outbreak of COVID investigative journalism by them (youtube link below). Denmark masks study: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6817 BBC Newsnight clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnRqUMxjvR4 5/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 5 - Vaccine ineffectiveness There were plenty of signs that the COVID vaccines were not effective in preventing infection, or transmission, or hospitalisation, or death with COVID, at a population level, just by comparing the rates before and after the introduction of the vaccines. The vaccine introduction in mid December 2020 coincided with an uptick in all of these variables. (What changed the trend was the appearance of the omicron variant which Bill Gates dolefully described as "a type of vaccine" which had done a better job of reaching the whole population than the vaccinators). But a study in the International Journal of Epidemiology gave evidence of something which we all observed anecdotally all around us: that vaccinated people were still becoming infected with the virus. The study found that after two doses of the Astra Zeneca vaccine or one dose of the Pfizer vaccine, that whatever immunity the vaccines delivered against the virus quickly waned and actually turned negative within 2-3 months (meaning recipients were more likely to be infected or hospitalised beyond that point). OurWorldInData link: https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/covid?pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=Confirmed+deaths&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+population=true&country=~OWID_WRL International Journal of Epidemiology link https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/52/1/22/6770060?login=false 6/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 6 - Risk to Children As we know, in 2020 schools across the UK were closed as part of the national lockdowns, with disastrous impact on education, particularly of the very young and those due to sit exams, and disastrous impact on working parents who had to somehow balance work and home schooling. However it was clear from very early days that children were at vanishingly small risk from the virus and that the risks to them of losing education (and the resultant isolation from their peers) would be far higher. An article in The Times discussed a study conducted on 260 hospitals in Britain in the first half of 2020 and concluded that "no child who was not already profoundly ill has died of Covid-19 in Britain" "The study looked at 260 hospitals in England, Wales and Scotland. Out of the 69,500 patients admitted with proven Covid-19 in the first six months of the year, 651 — or 0.9 per cent — were under 19 years of age". "Six deaths of minors were recorded. Three were newborn babies with other severe health problems. The other three were aged 15 to 18 years old and also had “profound health issues”. Callum Semple, professor in child health and outbreak medicine at the University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, who is the senior author of the study, said: “The deaths that we did observe were children with what we would describe as profound co-morbidities — not a touch of asthma, not cystic fibrosis.” These children’s underlying illnesses would have been considered as “life-limiting”, he said. “We did not have any deaths in otherwise healthy school-aged children.” However the authorities, and some in the teaching profession, were happy to let the illusion that children were at some risk from the virus to persist in order to promote their own agendas. Times article: https://www.thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/article/all-children-who-died-of-covid-19-were-already-seriously-ill-jlxr8mkxq 7/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 7 Vaccine adverse effects We were assured, repeatedly, from the moment the novel COVID injectables were released, that they were "safe and effective". However the evidence that they were not quickly mounted. As early as March 2020, the Astra Zeneca vaccine was suspended in Nordic countries following adverse effects in medical workers who received it. And the MHRA was forced to mention the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis particularly in young males from vaccination with the Pfizer and Moderna products. And a number of coroners reports directly blamed the COVID injectables as the cause of death in several cases. But the insistence always remained that these were just extremely rare cases. The lie was given to all of this by the MHRA's Yellow Card data. Yellow Card had, up until December 2021 at least, always been used as an "early warning system" to identify problems with medicines. From the beginning of the tollout in December 2020 the MHRA received an absolute deluge of Yellow Card reports from recipients of the injectables who had suffered adverse effects immediately afterwards, as well as medical personnel reporting these symptoms on behalf of the injured and deceased. While not every reported injury may have been directly caused by the vaccine, we also know that Yellow Cards received by the MHRA only constitute a small fraction of the adverse effects actually experienced (they previously estimated that only 10% of serious effects were reported). By September 2023 it was clear from the data that there was an enormous issue with the safety of the vaccines. Serious adverse events were being reported to the MHRA at a rate of 1 for every 424 doses, and deaths running at 1 for every 60,000 doses (and bear in mind most people had at least 2 doses) but to this day there has been no acknowledgement or independent investigation. AZ injuries story: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-norway-idUSKBN2B50GZ/ The MHRA data has been largely archived in obscure locations on the internet now so is hard to link to, but I have all of the receipts if anyone is interested. 8/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Item 8 - Exaggerating the numbers of people who were Vaccinated. We were led to believe by the media that we vaccine refuseniks were in a tiny minority - less than 10%. And this was used heavily as a tactic by the media and government to pressure everyone into being vaccinated. You'll remember all the pressure from the likes of Andrew Neil and Piers Morgan and Sajid Javed and Esther Rantzen and Anne McElvoy and Uncle Tom Cobley and all... But this 10% number was based on ONS data which relied on (old) estimates of the UK population. Meanwhile the Health Security Agency used data from NIMS, which has a record of everyone registered with the NHS, and it estimated that the proportion of the English population which had not received a vaccine, was 19.5%. And ICM ran an opinion poll for Scottish Television on a representative sample of the population which discovered that 32% of the sample (825 out of the 2570 participants) said they'd had no vaccines. But as identified by @profnfenton ICM were sufficiently astonished at this outcome that they decided to apply some "post-survey weighting" to their sample to bring the number down to the "correct" level of 8%. But it's clear that we unvaccinated are a sizeable minority - far more than 10%. And the government knew this too, which is why they eventually recoiled from making the vaccines mandatory in the NHS (and probably in other roles too). BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55274833 ICM poll, Prof Fenton analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccWOMtmH65U 9/10
@A1an_M - Alan
That's just a subset of the huge library of evidence that exists whoing that the whole of the coronavirus response was at best unnecessary and, more realistically, a gigantic fraud. You no doubt have plenty of examples of your own. But in summary: There was no "pandemic", simply a simulation of one. A simulation which could be repeated again tomorrow. And it could be done whether a novel virus existed or not. All that's needed is a compliant media, a gullible, hypnotised population, and a few grainy videos of crisis actors "dying" on foreign streets, and off we'll go again. Unless... unless some proper journalists are willing to tell the WHOLE truth about what happened in 2020-22, rather than just focus on the limited hangout about the lab leak and the source of the virus. Any volunteers? 10/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Of course the biggest fraud of all, and the one which the entire simulation depended on, and on which any new simulation will also depend, was the use of a test protocol, PCR, which was unfit for the purpose for which it was used. A test protocol which, as per its creator, can find pretty much anything in anyone, if done well. A test capable of finding tiny fragments of virus which are far too small to cause symptomatic illness, and far too small to make transmission to others a possibility. A test incapable of determining if the host is carrying live virus. A test which could deliver significant numbers of false positives and negatives. (False positives being a particular problem if, as mentioned below, decisions on isolation and contact tracing are being made on their basis). But a test whose sensitivity could be dialled up or down to show a sudden spike or dip in "cases" to meet the political requirements of the day. But the whole "testdemic" aspect is so important, it probably deserves a thread all of its own. One for another day... 11/10
@A1an_M - Alan
Probably worth adding that this thread is a summary of seven much longer threads which I wrote in Sep '23 to counter BBC VeryIffy's charge that there was an online Conspiracy Movement in the UK spreading misinformation about COVID and the response. See here: https://t.co/J6eOwBPb7i
@ianmSC - Ian Miller
This video by @0rf of Fauci humiliating himself is absolutely incredible — wear a mask outside, don’t wear a mask outside, we don’t need masks, actually wear two masks — it’s easy to how bad he was and how often he misled people https://t.co/lDEnNSoKAZ
@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch
🚨 THEY TRIED TO SCRUB THIS VIDEO FROM THE INTERNET It blew up then suddenly vanished everywhere. Every time it goes viral, it gets deleted. When something disappears this fast, there’s always a reason and it’s never the reason they give you. So what exactly were we not supposed to see?