reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - September 15, 2022 at 5:49 AM

Saved - July 13, 2025 at 8:34 PM

@Imawithher - I'ma Wither ☮️✍️

@DonaldJTrumpJr Your father is in the Epstein list so I wouldn't be screaming this too loudly, unless you want Daddy to go to jail. https://t.co/Na0eOVnrBV

@AnonWeaponry3 — GM_Anon

Posted - September 12, 2023 at 3:16 PM

Saved - September 12, 2023 at 8:59 PM

@AnonWeaponry3 - GM_Anon

Nothing to see The Guy who predicted Aaron Rogers injury has now had. His account suspended. @elonmusk @DaddyZaslav

@PapiTrumpo — il Donaldo Trumpo

Posted - November 4, 2023 at 2:16 AM

Saved - November 4, 2023 at 8:13 AM

@PapiTrumpo - il Donaldo Trumpo

@RobertKennedyJr I'M ON RECORD SAYING IT, YOU LYING PIECE OF SHIT!!! https://t.co/AOKhZdPn4O

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker acknowledges the strong influence of donors, special interests, and lobbyists over politicians. They claim to have turned down significant amounts of money from these sources, stating that they are not accepting any money from anyone except the people of the country. Speaker 1 brings up the speaker's past relationship with Hillary Clinton, suggesting that it worked for her. The speaker responds by saying that as a businessman, it was their job to get along with people, including politicians. They emphasize that they did a good job in doing so.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The donors, the special interest, the lobbyists have very strong power over these people. I'm spending all of my money. I'm not spending, I'm not getting any. I turned down hunt. I I turned down so much. I could have, right now, from special interests and donors, I could have double and triple what he's got. I've turned it down. I've turned down, last week, $5,000,000 from somebody. So I will tell you, I understand the game. I've been on the other side all of my life and they have a lot of control over our politicians. And I don't say that favorably and I'm not sure if there's another system, but I say this, I am not accepting any money from anybody. Nobody has control of me other than the people of this country. I'm gonna Speaker 1: do the Speaker 0: right thing. Speaker 1: You you got according to your, to what you said on one of the talk shows, you got Hillary Clinton to go to your wedding petrol. You gave her money. Maybe it works for Hillary Clinton. There's nothing more for anybody on this on this stage. Speaker 0: I was a businessman. I got along with Clinton. I got along with everybody. That was my job, to get along with people. Speaker 1: But the Speaker 0: simple fact is Excuse me. One second. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: I didn't want justice, Donald. Speaker 1: You cannot take Speaker 0: More energy tonight. I like that. Look. Speaker 1: I was asked the question. Speaker 0: I didn't want It was my obligation as a businessman to my family, to my company, to my employees, to get along with all politicians. I got along with all of them and I did a damn good job in doing it. Go ahead. So

@Acyn — Acyn

Posted - December 6, 2023 at 1:20 AM

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 2:53 AM

@Acyn - Acyn

Watters: You weren't on Jeffrey Epstein's jet were you? RFK JR: I was on Jeffrey Epstein's jet two times… https://t.co/5YO0efzMq7

Video Transcript AI Summary

I flew on Jeffrey Epstein's jet twice. The first time was in 1993 when I went to Florida with my wife and kids to visit my mom. We were offered a ride to Palm Beach by Glenn Maxwell, whom my wife had a relationship with. The second time, I flew with my family to Rapid City, South Dakota for a weekend of fossil hunting. I never flew on his jet alone. This was 30 years ago, before Epstein's crimes were known. I believe all information about Epstein and the high-level political figures involved should be released to the public without any redactions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You weren't ever on Jeffrey Epstein's jet, were you? I was on Jeffrey Epstein's jet two times. I was on it in 19 93 and I was on it and I went to Florida with my wife nineteen, 2 children visit my mom over Easter. My wife had I had some kind of relationship with Glenn Maxwell, and they offered us a ride to Palm Beach. So I went then and then on another other occasion. I flew again with my family with, I think, 4 of my children and and and married of my wife to Rapid City, South Dakota to go fossil hunting for a weekend and, but other otherwise, as I was never on his jet alone. I've been very open about this from the beginning. This was in 'ninety three, so it was 30 years ago, it was before anybody knew about Jeffrey Epstein's, you know, his nefarious issues and I agree with you that these all of this information should be released. We You should get real answers on what happened to Jeffrey Epstein and any of the high level political people that he was involved with, all of that should be open to the public, it should be absolutely transparent and I don't see why any of those records would have any redactions in them. Why would we be hiding that from the American public? Well, you might

@Prolotario1 — Ariel

Posted - December 21, 2023 at 2:35 AM

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 9:30 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Many doubted that anyone notable, influential, or powerful would be named. What are your thoughts on this now?

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

For all those saying no one notable will be named. For those saying no one of any influence will be named. For those who said only low level figures will be named. For those who said no one of any significant social standing will be named. For those who said no one powerful will be named. What is your opinion on this now?

@RealPatrickWebb - Patrick Webb

JUST IN: 170+ Epstein names to be released include associates, victims, and former presidents (plural). https://t.co/pRnFCGB4KL

Video Transcript AI Summary

Judge Loretta Preska has ordered the release of over 170 names associated with a settled civil lawsuit, including Jeffrey Epstein's friends, associates, and victims. Those who wish to keep their names concealed can file an appeal. Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted for her involvement in Epstein's abuse, is serving a 20-year sentence. Some names have already been revealed by individuals who publicly discussed their relationship with Epstein. Eleven names, including eight minor victims, will not be released. Virginia Giuffre accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, and he settled with her for a multimillion-dollar amount.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We're here outside the federal courthouse here in lower Manhattan, and this is where judge Loretta Preska has ordered that January 1st release date of more than 170 names associated with a civil lawsuit that was settled, some time ago here. But many of those names that will be released are Jeffrey Epstein's close friends, associates, and some of his victims. Now the judge is also allowing those individuals, who would like to keep their names concealed or did, to file an appeal to make their case before the release of those names in less than 2 weeks. Now many of those names that will come out certainly are known and notable, including, former presidents, but they are all part of a now settled civil lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell brought by Virginia Giuffre. Now Giuffre accused Maxwell of helping Epstein abuse her by arranging travel plans along with setting up meeting times and places around the world to facilitate her sexual abuse. Maxwell is now serving 20 years in a federal prison after she was convicted in 2021 for her role in a scheme to sexually exploit and abuse multiple teenage girls with Epstein over a 10 year period. Now Epstein died by suicide in a Manhattan Federal jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. The judge also noting in her order that some of the names that will be released have already been revealed because some of those individuals have spoken publicly about their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Meanwhile, at least 11 names will not be released, including 8 people who have been identified as minor victims of sexual abuse. Last night on Banfield, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Josh Schiffer talked about why some people are desperately fighting to have their names redacted? Speaker 1: So there's a lot of reasons someone wouldn't want their name associated with someone whose name is Literally everything bad in high society and regular society for that matter. So if you were someone of particular current Relevant importance. Think someone big in finance. Think someone big in politics. Jeffrey Epstein knew Everyone, when you said earlier he he powed around with royalty. Speaker 0: Now Virginia Giuffre also has accused Britain's prince Andrew of sexually assaulting her, when she was 17 years old and being sexually trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. Both prince Andrew and Epstein were very known associates. Now prince Andrew has denied those claims. However, he did agree to pay Giuffre a multimillion dollar settlement. Adrienne? Alright. Thank you very much, Dre, for your report.

@CollinRugg — Collin Rugg

Posted - January 6, 2024 at 2:59 AM

Saved - January 7, 2024 at 12:38 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

ESPN has apologized for Aaron Rodgers' comments about Jimmy Kimmel and the Epstein documents, acknowledging that it was a dumb and factually inaccurate joke. Kimmel responded with anger, threatening to sue and pointing out his connection to Epstein's former private chef.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: ESPN has apologized for Aaron Rodgers' "dumb" comments about Jimmy Kimmel and the Epstein documents. ESPN in damage control. The network is fuming after Rodgers made the joke on live air, saying "it should have never happened." "Aaron made a dumb and factually inaccurate joke about Jimmy Kimmel. It should never have happened. We all realized that in the moment." Kimmel had a meltdown over Rodgers' comments and threatened to sue. "Dear Aa*shole... Your reckless words put my family in danger. Keep it up and we will debate the facts further in court." Kimmel, who was *not* in the Epstein docs, is good friends with Epstein's former private chef. He also enjoys doing ‘pranks’ like this:

Video Transcript AI Summary

What do you think of her appearance? Do you find her attractive or not?

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Tell us what you think of the stacking. I mean, do you think that she's you think that she's okay. Doesn't she? I mean, do you think that she's attractive or no?

@Prolotario1 — Ariel

Posted - April 20, 2024 at 1:56 AM

Saved - April 20, 2024 at 2:49 AM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Do you all see this? This guy said I am awfully protective of Michael Flynn. 🤣 What in the world has he been reading? 🤡 I have some weirdos that follow me. 🤓

@IndySkiez - Indy Skys

@Prolotario1 You seem to be awfully protective towards this Flynn foe. Why is that Ariel? I believe we all know exactly who he is but you seem to be coming to his defense quite often. Is he paying you? How you making your money Ariel?You know we know who you are! You played your game too long

@WarMonitors — War Monitor

Posted - April 30, 2024 at 4:55 PM

Saved - May 1, 2024 at 12:41 AM

@WarMonitors - War Monitor

This pests’ last name is Epstein btw https://t.co/YXaqA1mLFs

@ZeekArkham — Zeek Arkham 🇺🇸

Posted - September 15, 2024 at 12:19 AM

Saved - September 15, 2024 at 3:53 PM

@ZeekArkham - Zeek Arkham 🇺🇸

This might be the calmest, hate DM I’ve ever gotten. In his bio he says he’s an evangelical minister. Dude’s really praying by to God against me, huh? Well… the most important thing is you’re all stuck with me. Guess I’m just gonna have to settle in with you patriots and get comfortable.

@BGatesIsaPyscho — Concerned Citizen

Posted - September 22, 2024 at 12:49 PM

Saved - September 23, 2024 at 12:15 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

Name a Hollywood star you think didn’t get involved with Epstein, Diddy Parties or God knows what else? I’ll go first:- Keanu Reeves https://t.co/x5SV7CD8iP

@LauraLoomer — Laura Loomer

Posted - September 26, 2024 at 2:29 AM

Saved - September 26, 2024 at 2:51 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m questioning why you sent a female colleague to apologize for your defamation. If you don’t issue a written retraction on X for using fake and photoshopped images of me and President Trump to launch a misogynistic attack, I will sue you, just like I’m suing Bill Maher. It’s cowardly to use fake pictures to defame me and Trump without taking responsibility. I demand a retraction in writing and on air, or legal action will follow. It’s time for the media to be held accountable for their lies.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Hey @andersoncooper Why are you sending a female colleague of yours to apologize for your defamation? If you do not issue a retraction in writing on X for showing fake and photoshopped pics of me and President Trump in an effort to spew a sick, misogynistic, and defamatory attack against me, I will sue you, the same way I’m going to sue @billmaher. How much of a coward do you have to be to use fake pics to defame me and @realDonaldTrump and then not apologize yourself? Issue a retraction in writing and on air or else you’re getting sued. It’s time for you fake news freaks to be held accountable for your lies and deception.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

WATCH: CNN @CNN was just forced to issue an on air retraction after ⁦@andersoncooper⁩ and other hosts ran fake & photoshopped pictures of me and President Trump on air last week in an effort to demonize me for the crime of flying on his plane to the Presidential debate. https://t.co/bdXJHG2doF

Video Transcript AI Summary

CNN aired segments on Friday and Saturday that included a digitally altered image of Donald Trump and Laura Loomer taken from social media. CNN stated that the image had been altered by a third party and should not have been included, and that they regret the error.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Friday evening and on Saturday, CNN aired a number of segments that briefly showed an image of former president Donald Trump and Laura Loomer taken from social media. On review, this image have been digitally altered by a third party and should not have been included. We regret the error.

@VigilantFox — The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Posted - December 18, 2024 at 11:09 PM

Saved - December 19, 2024 at 4:03 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared a series of shocking stories that the media overlooked. The first highlights a new congressional spending bill that expands COVID-like powers for future pandemics. Former CDC Director Robert Redfield called for the repeal of the liability shield for vaccine makers, criticizing the overselling of COVID vaccines. Michael Cohen acknowledged media inaccuracies regarding Trump. Aaron Rodgers addressed his critics, and Biden proposed a stock trading ban for Congress. Other posts discussed various controversies, including a potential criminal investigation and significant viewer losses for MSNBC.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Congress’s new spending bill TURBOCHARGES Covid-like powers for future pandemics. This includes mask mandates, vaccine passports, expanded emergency health powers, gain-of-function research, and even liability shields for mRNA vaccine makers. This news comes as Governor Gavin Newsom declares a “bird flu emergency” in California. Attorney Tom Renz (@RenzTom) reported on X, “Congressional spending bill is a big pharma gift extending and expanding COVID emergency powers to other pandemics and even reiterating mRNA vaccine immunity!” “We are evaluating the details of this 1500+ page monstrosity, but it dramatically expands federal power for plandemic response and funds it all further. This bill WILL set up for the next plandemic and potentially make the next response even worse than the response to COVID.” (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - EX-CDC Director Calls on Congress to END The Liability Shield for Vaccine Makers “These companies have to be able to be held liable for their products like any other company,” said former CDC Director Robert Redfield as he called on Congress to repeal the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act. Repealing the act would strip pharmaceutical companies of their liability shield, forcing them to be accountable for injuries caused by their products. While he acknowledged the law was “well-intended” when enacted under Reagan, Redfield stated bluntly that it “doesn’t work.” Redfield also criticized the overselling of COVID vaccines, claiming their safety and efficacy were exaggerated to compel public compliance. “The vaccines clearly were oversold,” he said, adding that they never should have been mandated, as many lost their jobs and livelihoods over them. Senator Ron Johnson described the situation as even more “sinister” than what Dr. Redfield described, accusing health agencies of sabotaging early treatments like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to protect Pfizer and Moderna’s profits. “You can’t get an emergency use authorization on a vaccine” if an effective therapy already exists, Johnson explained, claiming this strategy cleared the path for the COVID jabs while crushing potentially life-saving treatments. “That [the suppression of early treatment] paved the way for the emergency use authorization for the vaccines. And then it was full speed ahead,” Johnson lamented.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Vaccines were oversold, and mandates led to job losses for many. While the intent behind vaccine liability laws was good, companies should be held accountable for vaccine injuries. Early treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were undermined to secure emergency use authorization for vaccines, resulting in unnecessary loss of life. The suppression of effective therapies benefitted companies like Pfizer and Moderna financially. Despite evidence supporting alternative treatments, they were dismissed, paving the way for vaccine mandates without addressing potential issues. The public response to vaccine injuries has been inadequate and unacceptable.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There was a proactive decision that anything that suggested that vaccines didn't work would somehow maybe push people not to get vaccinated. So therefore, we were going to oversell the vaccines. The vaccines clearly were oversold. They should have never been mandated. People should have never lost their jobs or livelihood. The Senator knows. I feel that we really I think the intent in making no liability for vaccines when they pass those laws was well intended, but it doesn't work. These companies have to be able to be held liable for their products like any other company. Hopefully Congress will change that so that these companies that make these vaccines that do have vaccine injury, people can get compensated for the injury they suffered, particularly in a situation which was so inappropriate where they were mandated to get this vaccine, even if their instincts were not to get the vaccine. Speaker 1: Let me quick hop in here because it was more sinister than that. The fact that they sabotage early treatment, I mean, truthfully, I was working with Novartis, they were all excited about the trials on hydroxychloroquine that just ended. And my conversations is just, you know, radio silence after the end of April. It's like somebody turned a switch going, we're not looking at early treatment. You know? Then they went and sabotaged, you know, ivermectin. You know? So you y'all you're not a horse. I mean, why did they do it? Well, if you had an effective therapy, you can't get emergency use authorization on a vaccine. Okay? Again, this was this was corrupt. This was sinister, and hundreds of thousands of people, you know, doctors have said this. I'm I'm not a doctor. Probably lost their lives lacking early treatment. So people need to understand that. That's what we need to hold people accountable to, and we we have to lay out that reality because it's an awful reality. Speaker 2: So could you just repeat that? That is such an important point. The fact that Ivermectin was a possible available alternative treatment could have cost who money and in the billions. Correct? Speaker 1: Well, yeah. Pfizer, Moderna. And again, I I remember Pierre Kory, you know, we held him had him, testify about corticosteroids the end of May when I had John Ioannidis talk about this. It's not SARS. This isn't, Ebola. You know, this is gonna be like a bad flu season trying to calm people down. We had Pierre Kory come and talk about corticosteroids. Of course, he was vilified for that until about 8 weeks later. There's a study on dexamethasone, underdosed, by the way, is what how it was used, but also, napkin, a standard of care. He came in with ivermectin. He had a big manuscript. Thought the pandemic is over. This is a testifying in in, December before the emergency use authorization. Didn't realize how they were gonna crush Ivermectin and never really saw the light of day in terms of, use. But, again, it was that made paved the way for the emergency use authorization for for for the vaccines. And then it was full speed ahead. Don't don't don't take a look at any problems it might cause. I mean, this is what we've committed to. This is what we're starting to mandate and the result. And by the way, read Breanne Dressen's book, Worth A Shot. You'll get a real sense of how outrageous our public response has been to the vaccine injury. It's it's unconscionable what we've done what we haven't done.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Michael Cohen Turns Heads on CNN: Trump Is RIGHT About Media Lies In a jaw-dropping moment on CNN, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney turned critic, admitted what Trump supporters have been saying for years: the legacy media is riddled with sloppy, agenda-driven journalism. This conversation was a reaction to the recent news that President-elect Donald Trump filed a defamation lawsuit against ABC News, resulting in a $15 million settlement. The lawsuit stemmed from anchor George Stephanopoulos’s inaccurate on-air assertion that Trump had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll. Cohen, who famously flipped on Trump, didn’t hold back as he detailed a handful of the “hundred” lies the media spread about him during his time as a Trump ally. “Look, I was the recipient of more than 100 lies, and I understand what Trump is doing in terms of changing the way defamation cases are brought in this country. “You may remember the allegations. I was in Prague—never been to Prague. I was in Czechoslovakia. I paid $10 million to Kompromatz. I have a house next to Putin in Sochi. None of this is true. “On top of that, there was another one that came out as an example where I allegedly was paid 400,000 by Poroshenko to create a meeting between him and Donald Trump during the presidency. That is also not true.” Cohen’s comments back up Trump’s long-standing claim that the media is packed with fake news aimed at smearing him and his allies. Delivering a final blow, Cohen said, “I think that media has to do their job. They need to get the facts right.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Polls have often been inaccurate, and this isn't the only instance of misinformation in the news. Despite rarely agreeing, I acknowledge that Scott is correct about the issues of sloppy journalism and polling. I've experienced numerous falsehoods, including allegations about my whereabouts and financial dealings that are completely untrue. For instance, claims about my presence in Prague or receiving money from Poroshenko to arrange a meeting with Trump are false. The media must fulfill its responsibility to report accurately and verify facts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The poll was wrong. Many of the polls are wrong. They've been wrong for many cycles, but it's not like this is the only thing that has been said in the news from either side that is not true. Speaker 1: I hate to say it, but Scott is actually right about this one. I hate to say it because Scott and I very rarely agree on anything. He's right. He's he's right about this in the fact that sloppy journalism, sloppy polling, and what they did. It's look. I was the recipient 100 lies, and I understand what Trump is doing in terms of changing the way defamation cases are brought in this country. You may remember the allegations I was in Prague. Never been to Prague. I was in Slovakia. I paid $10,000,000 to. I have a house next to Putin in Sochi. None of this is true. On top of that, there was another one that came out as an example where I allegedly was paid 400,000, by Poroshenko to create a meeting between him, and, Donald Trump during the president. That is also not true. Speaker 0: So do you think it should be easier? You believe in No. Speaker 1: I think that media has to do their job. They have to actually they they need to get the facts right now. Wait a Speaker 0: second. That's always wrong.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Aaron Rodgers drops a brutal PSA on ESPN to all his haters. “Say whatever the f*** you want about me but before you do … state your vax status … because then when you say things about me people can be like, ‘Oh you are captured by the multi-billion dollar psyop and you’re still upset about it.’” Credit:

Video Transcript AI Summary

Here's a quick PSA: Before sharing opinions about me, please state your vaccination status. This context helps others understand where your comments are coming from. If you're fully vaccinated and boosted, it’s relevant to the conversation. Just like I share my accolades, I encourage you to include your vaccination status in your bio when speaking publicly. This way, everyone knows your perspective and can interpret your words accordingly. It’s important to clarify this, especially given the discussions around COVID. So, before you criticize, just add that little disclaimer about your vaccination status.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, Aaron Speaker 1: Hold on. I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not done. Speaker 0: Oh, shit. Speaker 1: I just got a PSA. Speaker 0: Just a quick PSA. Alright. Earlier. Just a Speaker 1: quick PSA reminder. Starting 12 countdown to 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, we're about Speaker 1: to get there. Flow. Got some flow. Speaker 0: Tight ground. CFP National. Speaker 1: Yeah. Champion. Like a nice Speaker 0: That's a PSA? That's a good PSA. It's a catchy, cheerful Speaker 1: is this. I know I know I gotta say this multiple times for people because they don't listen. But say whatever the fuck you want about me. I don't care. But just before you do it, whether you state your name, your accolades, pronouns, whatever it is, just state your back status so that anything you say afterwards gets put in the right light to just get it out there. Because then when you say things about me, people can at least be like, oh, you are captured by the multibillion dollar propaganda sign off, and you're still upset about it. Speaker 0: Okay. This will help things out. Yeah. This is good. This will settle it all down. I appreciate that. And, hey. Speaker 1: You know what I mean? Just put that in the, just so everybody knows where you're coming from. Everybody knows. Okay, cool. You're twice vaxxed Moderna with 3 booster shots and then boom, boom, boom. Say what you want to say. Whatever. I don't care. I'm just saying a PSA. Just please help everybody out. Who's who's who's wondering, where is this coming from? Including myself. What the fuck is this coming from? But just give a little PSA. You do a little bit of digging, then you know where it's all coming from. Right? You're captured. You're highly vaccinated and then say whatever the hell you wanna say about me because I couldn't give 2 shits about it. All I care about is that you put that little disclaimer out there just like it's in the bottom for me. The champ you know, MVP, and I am enthusiastic about Ayahuasca. Just put, you know, instead of your accolades that you need to have out there so desperately, just put, like, you know, your access as well because you care so much about it, you know, during the COVID years. Years. Speaker 0: Alright. Speaker 1: So just put it out there on your on your bio when you're about to when you're about on on on your any shows or whatever. You don't just need a broach with your initials. Alright. Put your back status on there too. Speaker 0: Okay. Alright.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

AARON RODGERS: “Say whatever the f*** you want about me but before you do … state your vax status … because then when you say things about me people can be like, ‘Oh you are captured by the multi-billion dollar psyop and you’re still upset about it.’” 🤣

Video Transcript AI Summary

Here's a quick PSA: Before you criticize me, please state your vaccination status along with your name and accolades. This context helps others understand where your opinions are coming from. If you're fully vaccinated and still upset, it adds clarity to your perspective. Just like I share my achievements, I encourage you to include your vaccination status in your bios or when you speak publicly. It’s important for transparency and understanding. So, when you express your thoughts, let everyone know your background, especially regarding vaccination, to provide context for your views.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, Aaron Hold on. I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not done. Oh, shit. I just got a PSA. Just a quick few. Alright. I thought we were Just a quick PSA reminder. Start with 12, countdown to 1. Yeah. Well, we're about to get there. Slow. Got some football. A tight crown. CFP National. Now be, that's BSA? That's a good BSA. It's a catchy, jingle. Is this. I know I gotta say this multiple times for people because they don't listen, but say whatever the fuck you want about me. I don't care. But just before you do it, whether you state your name, your accolades, pronouns, whatever it is, just state your back status so that anything you say afterwards gets put in the right light to just get it out there. Because then when you say things about me, people can at least be like, oh, you are captured by the multibillion dollar propaganda sky off, and you're still upset about it. Okay. This will help things out. This is good. This will settle it all down. I appreciate that. And, hey. You know what I mean? Just put that in the just so everybody knows where you're coming from. Everybody knows. Okay. Cool. You're twice vaxxed Moderna with 3 booster shots. And then boom, boom, boom. Say what you want to say. Whatever. I don't care. I'm just saying a PSA. Just please help everybody out. Who's, who's, who's wondering, where is this coming from? Including myself. What the fuck is this coming from? But just give it a little PSA. You do a little bit of digging. Then you know where it's all coming from, right? You're captured. You're highly vaccinated and then say whatever the hell you want to say about me because I couldn't give 2 shits about it. All I care about is that you put that little disclaimer out there. Just like it's in the bottom for me that I'm a champ, you know, MVP, and I am enthusiastic about Ayahuasca. Just put, you know, instead of your accolades that you need to have out there, so desperately, just put, like, you know, your back status as well because you care so much about it, you know, during the COVID years. Alright. So just put it out there on your on your bio when you're about to when you're back on on your any shows or whatever. You don't just need a broach with your initials. Alright. Put your back status on there too. Okay. Alright.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Joe Biden Targets Pelosi and Coup Leaders in Stunning Act of Revenge With Nancy Pelosi stuck in the hospital recovering from a broken hip, Biden is floating the idea of banning members of Congress from trading stocks while in office. He stated, “I think we should be changing the law that we have to abide by at the federal level—that nobody, nobody in the Congress should be able to make money in the stock market while they’re in the Congress.” However, Fox News host Jesse Watters isn’t buying Biden’s timing, saying that this isn’t about fighting corruption but “getting retribution.” He reported. “Biden didn’t want to ban Congress from insider trading during his entire 50-year career in D.C., but a month before he leaves, he gives Nancy a little gift. This isn’t about stopping corruption. It’s about getting retribution.” “So if Nancy wants to get rich in the House, she might have to do it the old-fashioned way, peddling influence like the Big Guy.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Biden seems more focused on seeking revenge against coup leaders than on his presidential duties, as evidenced by his recent actions towards Nancy Pelosi, who is currently hospitalized. There's a call for a change in laws to prevent Congress members from profiting in the stock market while in office, highlighting a conflict of interest. Biden has historically resisted banning insider trading for Congress, but now appears to be using this situation for retribution rather than genuine reform. The White House has not responded to inquiries about whether Biden has checked on Pelosi after her injury. If Pelosi wants to gain wealth, she may need to resort to traditional methods of influence peddling.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Biden doesn't care as much about being president. He cares more about getting revenge against the coup leaders. Joe just threw a hand grenade at Nancy Pelosi while she's stuck in a hospital bed in Germany. Speaker 1: I don't know how you look your constituents in the eye and know because the job they gave you gave you an inside track to make more money. I think we should be changing the law that we we have to but we abide by the at the federal level. That nobody nobody in the congress should be able to make money in the stock market while they're in the congress. Speaker 0: Biden didn't wanna ban congress from insider trading during his entire 50 year career in DC. But a month before he leaves, he gives Nancy a little gift. This isn't about stopping corruption. It's about getting retribution. We asked the White House if the president has called Nancy to check-in on her after she broke her hip in Belgium. We haven't heard back. So if Nancy wants to get rich in the house, she might have to do it the old fashioned way, peddling influence like the big guy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

While you’re here, remember to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - BUSTED: ‘The View’ Co-Host May Face Criminal Investigation https://vigilantnews.com/post/busted-the-view-co-host-may-face-criminal-investigation/

BUSTED: ‘The View’ Co-Host May Face Criminal Investigation The tables have turned. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - @RepThomasMassie rips Speaker Mike Johnson as he gets another prediction right. He writes, “People call me "NostraThomas" for accurately predicting @SpeakerJohnson would use the Christmas recess to force a massive spending bill through Congress. After claiming he would not, Johnson is embracing a D.C. tradition that's nearly as old as decorating Christmas trees.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Christmas Omnibus tradition is over, and there will be no more omnibus bills. Each year, Congress faces pressure to pass large spending bills right before Christmas, often under threat of staying in session over the holidays. This tactic creates urgency, with lawmakers voting on bills they haven't read just to get home for Christmas. The cycle repeats every year, with Congress caught off guard by fiscal deadlines, similar to a florist being surprised by Valentine's Day. The strategy involves using the holiday as leverage to push through spending measures, often with controversial provisions attached.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We have, we have broken the Christmas Omni, and I have no intention of going back to that terrible tradition. So there won't be a Christmas Omni bus. If somebody asked me in the hallway a little while ago, will there be many buses? I don't we don't want any buses. We're not gonna do any buses. Okay? Speaker 1: And I've seen this play call, like, 4 times in the 7 years I've been in Congress. They've punted the ball until December 20th. And what they'll do is they'll come in a in a closed room with us, and they'll say, okay. Now we've got the really big omnibus. And if you vote for this, you can go home for Christmas. But if you don't vote for it and it fails, we're gonna make you stay here over Christmas and New Year's. And it's almost like a dystopian future. I've been in the closed room where they start chanting, vote, vote, vote, vote. Yeah. And people run up there and vote for something they've not read. CR, CR, CR. Oh, you wanna go home for Christmas? We'll vote for this, and we'll let you go see your families and your new grandbaby. And you can watch your 2 year old open presence. But if you don't, you're gonna stay here with your your leadership and their leadership and wait and wait for a bunch of geriatric senators to send over the answer. Speaker 2: By the way, I made another prediction that it would end right before Christmas, that it wouldn't go till next spring because and we've talked about this on your show, Brian, for as long as I've been coming on your show, which is at least 12 years. You're coming a mile away. God. Every year every year every year, they do the same play. Christmas. Christmas Christmas Eve's, shutdown, panic because here's what they're doing. They're taking our families hostage, the the the families of congressmen. Congressman in Washington DC on December 20th, which is when the CR expires, and they're gonna either put another worse CR that's probably gonna have Ukraine and everything else attached to it, or they're gonna do the full on omnibus depending on how the election comes out. They're gonna do that on December 20th, and the congressman, they're gonna smell that those jet fumes, the, from DCA, the Ronald Reagan Airport. And the combination of the fumes from those airplanes wafting over to the capital and the this CR expiring then, they're gonna start chanting, vote, vote, vote, and they will vote for anything you put in front of them. Because the speaker always comes and says, doesn't matter who the speaker is. They always say, if you vote for this, you can go home and open presents with your family. And if you don't vote for this, we're gonna be here over Christmas because the optics are bad. And just go ahead and tell your families, pack up those presents and bring them to Washington DC if they wanna be with you at Christmas. No. Nobody's gonna bring their family to DC over Christmas. So they're you basically they're like the Grinch. Yeah. Some people call me Nostra Thomas, for predicting this. But the reality is, Brian, we could go back. It's a lot of work. God. Yeah. We could go back on your radio show. We could find clips of me predicting this every year. It's not a prediction. It's just how the swamp works and the Uniparty works. Listen. Congress being surprised by the fiscal deadline of September 30th is like a florist being surprised by Valentine's Day. It happens every year. Speaker 1: Prepare for it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - More Bad News for MSNBC as They Hemorrhage Viewers and Are Now Losing to NewsNation Already dealing with sustained post-election ratings woes, MSNBC witnessed yet another embarrassment over the weekend when it finished behind the plucky TV startup NewsNation in the key advertising demographic of adults aged 25-54. According to Nielsen Media Research, the liberal cable news network averaged just 17,000 viewers in the key demo on Saturday between the hours of noon and 7 p.m. ET. In comparison, NewsNation’s programming attracted an audience of 23,000 in the 25-54 demographic in that same time period. Read More: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/msnbc-ratings-newsnation-donald-trump-b2666544.html

More bad news for MSNBC as they hemorrhage viewers and are now losing to NewsNation Amid plummeting ratings since Donald Trump’s election last month, several of the liberal cable news network’s programs on Saturday finished behind the centrist cable news upstart in the key 25-54 demographic. independent.co.uk

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Peter Hotez blames “organized” anti-vaxxers for causing 200,000 American deaths by convincing people COVID shots weren’t safe. “My estimate is 200,000 Americans needlessly perished because they refused the COVID vaccines. They were victims of this.” “I still pin most of the blame on an organized anti-vaccine movement that targeted people, that had convinced them that the COVID vaccine wasn’t safe… But most of the blame still goes to this organized anti-vaccine movement.” Just a reminder: Hotez turned down a $2.6 million offer to debate RFK Jr. on vaccine science, with the money going to the charity of his choice. Instead of engaging in scientific debate, he preemptively BLOCKS anyone he disagrees with.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The organized anti-vaccine movement significantly influenced public perception of the COVID vaccine, leading to an estimated 200,000 unnecessary deaths in the U.S. due to vaccine refusal. This movement targeted individuals and spread misinformation about vaccine safety. In contrast, our low-cost COVID vaccine, developed without a patent, successfully reached 100 million people, particularly in India and Indonesia. However, the primary responsibility for vaccine hesitancy still lies with the organized anti-vaccine efforts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I still pin most of the blame on an organized, anti vaccine movement that targeted people that convinced them that the COVID vaccine wasn't safe. And my estimate is 200,000 Americans needlessly perish because they refused the COVID vaccines. They were victims of this. We, we, in our case, our low cost COVID vaccine, we did it with no patent. It reached a 100,000,000 people. In India and Indonesia, that's the exception. But the, the most of the blame still goes to this organized anti vaccine movement.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson #1 - The Omnibus bill may be pulled off the House floor due to pressure from @elonmusk, per Fox News. "A post on 𝕏 by Elon Musk sent shockwaves through the Capitol….One source said the bill is now bleeding support from the GOP." Credit: @WesternLensman

Video Transcript AI Summary

House Republicans are reconsidering an interim spending bill, possibly opting for a clean version, which raises questions about disaster assistance. This shift follows a provocative post by Elon Musk on X, warning lawmakers that those who vote in favor should expect to lose their positions in two years. This has caused turmoil among lawmakers as they assess their votes. A member of House Republican leadership criticized Musk's involvement, suggesting he should focus on bigger issues. The situation has led to diminishing support for the bill within the GOP. When asked how many Democratic votes are needed for passage, a senior aide indicated that the number is significant.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Neil, good afternoon. We're told right now in the past, 30 or 40 minutes here that they might try to pull this interim spending bill off the floor and maybe just go with a clean bill, unclear what that means for disaster assistance. Here's what happened. A post on x by Elon Musk sent shock waves through the capital. House Republicans were trying to see if they have enough votes to pass the spending bill in the next hour or 2. Musk posted that anyone who votes yes should lose their office in 2 years, and lawmakers are scrambling. The tweets from Musk and other has that complicated this? Well, I mean, I think that there's always a lot of, interest in what's happening up here. And, this is more than Netflix. They're telling people if they vote yes, they should be voted out. The social media, world is a part of our politics, and, I think, the members have to expect that. There'll be a lot of hard votes in the next couple of years. A member of the House Republican leadership told Fox that Musk is not helping. The lawmaker added that Musk has bigger fish to fry than picking a fight with House Republicans. One source said the bill is now bleeding support from the GOP. When asked how many Democrats the GOP needs to pass the bill, a senior aid replied, quote, a lot.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk @WesternLensman BONUS #1 - Joy Behar FUMES at Trump Over COVID Lies She Still Believes https://vigilantnews.com/post/joy-behar-fumes-at-trump-over-covid-lies-she-still-believes/

Joy Behar FUMES at Trump Over COVID Lies She Still Believes This is just embarrassing... vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk @WesternLensman BONUS #2 - Vatican on the Brink of Bankruptcy: Report https://vigilantnews.com/post/vatican-on-the-brink-of-bankruptcy-report/

Vatican on the Brink of Bankruptcy: Report Pope Francis himself admitted the gravity of the situation. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk @WesternLensman BONUS #3 - Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use https://vigilantnews.com/post/donald-trumps-covid-game-changer-finds-surprising-new-use/

Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use As Ivermectin emerges as a cancer treatment, Hydroxychloroquine shows effectiveness against another target disease. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk @WesternLensman BONUS #4 - Ex-Secret Service Agent Warns of Major Attack on Trump Before Inauguration https://vigilantnews.com/post/ex-secret-service-agent-warns-of-major-attack-on-trump-before-inauguration/

Ex-Secret Service Agent Warns of Major Attack on Trump Before Inauguration “It’s going to be something of a much bigger magnitude" than the two assassination attempts. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk @WesternLensman BONUS #5 - Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell https://vigilantnews.com/post/cancer-surgeon-drops-ivermectin-bombshell/

Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell Can ivermectin treat cancer? Watch Dr. Kathleen Ruddy explain what happened after she observed late-stage cancer patients taking this “miracle drug.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RepThomasMassie @SpeakerJohnson @elonmusk @WesternLensman Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this thread, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go. In other news, a tsunami of devastating reports has come crashing down on the COVID shots. See more details on that below: https://t.co/dOj1a4BR4p

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Tsunami of devastating news crashes down on the COVID jabs. A bombshell study reveals COVID shot vials are loaded with DNA contamination levels 4 to 5 times HIGHER than what regulators allow. But that's just the beginning. Evidence now shows the shots SHED (Peters et al.) and worsen heart conditions over time (hidden Pfizer report). And if that weren’t enough, Pfizer is facing explosive allegations of hiding vaccine-related deaths during its clinical trials (Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan). Dr. Jessica Rose (@JesslovesMJK) has expressed deep concern over the newly confirmed evidence of vaccine shedding, which appears to extend far beyond intimate contact. This conversation is a must-watch. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary

Recent studies have raised serious concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding potential shedding effects. A new study published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory found that women indirectly exposed to vaccinated individuals reported significant menstrual irregularities, with over 70% experiencing symptoms shortly after exposure. Additionally, research confirmed the presence of residual DNA in vaccine vials, which could pose risks, including potential integration into human DNA, leading to health issues like cancer. Reports also indicate that heart conditions in vaccinated individuals are worsening over time. Accusations have emerged against Pfizer for allegedly concealing deaths during vaccine trials. These findings highlight the urgent need for further investigation into the safety and long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout. It's great to be here with you all again. Since the rollout of the COVID injections, it's been one horror story after another. But this week, the dangerous lethal injections and all of those who've supported them and still support them may just have been hit with a series of wrecking balls that there is no coming back from. The following should infuriate everyone particularly because of the implications for those who went out of their way, lost their jobs, some even lost their homes, and in some cases, their lives to avoid playing Russian roulette with these injections. These people are also now confirmed to be at risk from shedding. Well, now a new study finds concerning evidence of COVID 19 vaccine shedding. So the conspiracy theorists are just right time and time and time again. A new study titled menstrual abnormalities strongly associated with proximity to COVID 19 vaccinated individuals was just published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. In spring of 2021, My Cycle Story launched a secure online survey to which 92.3% of over 6,000 respondents self reported menstrual irregularities occurring after the rollout of the COVID 19 injectables. Each respondent served as her own control because prior to the rollout of the injections, the vast majority had regular menstrual cycles. A subgroup of 3,390 respondents were only indirectly exposed to the injections or the virus. This subgroup reported, 1, being unvaccinated for COVID 19, 2, having had no COVID symptoms, and 3, no positive test for COVID 19. Yet a substantial majority of these women who were only indirectly exposed to the injectables or the infections still had many of the same menstrual abnormalities as the 2,659 women who were directly exposed to an injection or symptoms or tested positive. Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to examine the association, not assuming causation, between abnormal menses experienced after the COVID 19 vaccine rollout by respondents who are only indirectly exposed by some degree of proximity to persons. So this part is very important. The percentage of the indirectly exposed participants who reported being within 6 feet of a COVID injected person was 85.5%. Of these, over 70% had irregular menstrual symptoms within 1 week, and over 50% had irregular menstrual symptoms within just under 3 days after exposure. So when comparing daily proximity to a vaccinated person, the categories of daily within 6 feet outside the household household versus seldom or sometimes daily outside 6 feet had the highest relative risk at 1.34. So let me take you to the layman's terms of this. The study found that women with daily close proximity within 6 feet to vaccinated individuals outside their household had a 34% higher risk of heavier bleeding, a 28% higher risk of menstruation starting over 7 days early, and a 26% higher risk of bleeding lasting more than 7 days. The scientific plausibility for these findings is supported by several key observations which are discussed in the manuscript. The timing and consistency with shedding studies, and you can see, the further information on that, the prolonged presence of vaccine components, documented excretion pathways, alignment with previous studies, and potential mechanisms of action. The authors concluded our findings suggest possible indirect transmission of ingredients or product of the COVID 19 vaccines, presumably through shedding from people who received 1 or more of the COVID 19 injections. But then we have another bombshell which is, of course, linked. A new paper confirms presence of DNA in COVID 19 shot vials settles issues pertaining to DNA quantification methods shows spike persistence and exosomal shuttling or shedding. This is from doctor Jessica Rose. So Ulrik Cammer, Verena Schultz, and Klaus Stegar have just published what might be the paper of the century entitled BioNTech RNA Based COVID 19 Injections Contain Large Amounts of Residual DNA Including an SV 40 promoter enhancer sequence. It got through peer review on the 3rd December 2024 and confirms much of what has already been evidenced and answers many questions lingering in the background. But then on top of that, we also have a hidden Pfizer report that shows heart conditions in the vaccinated are getting worse over time. So the author says I told you here about Pfizer's abstract of its interim report 5 showing at least 23 to 40% higher risk of some heart related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the UK Medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time, in summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer's interim report 5, then no wonder is sitting on it. Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report, but the author has managed to obtain a copy. It looks like the author was right. The detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the hazard ratios in the abstract which he reported last time. To recap, this is a report of a post authorization safety study of Pfizer's COVID vaccine. National regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorization of most new medicines. They provide the data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis matched for things like age and sex to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions. So below are some heart related cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer's full interim report 5. You will immediately notice that the incidence for each type of condition is significantly greater in the COVID vaccinated, but we already knew that from the hazard ratios in the abstract. What's worse is the curves diverge over time, I e the relative incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated increases over the time period of the data in the report. So that's between December 8, 2020 March 21, 2022. Acute cardiovascular injury, 23% times, 23% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 30. And you can see all of these arrhythmias, 27% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 138. Heart failure, 2% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse, though not quite statistically significant at this point on page 146. And stress cardiomyopathy, 30% higher Speaker 1: in the vaccinated and getting Speaker 0: worse, though not yet statistically significant. Vaccinated and getting worse, though not yet statistically significant, page 1 30 53 rather. Coronary artery disease, 40% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 60. Myocarditis, 21 days, a 130% higher in the vaccinated, though not quite statistically significant, page 168. Furthermore, disturbing, Pfizer accused of hiding deaths in COVID 19 vaccine trials. A team of researchers analyzing Pfizer's clinical trial data has accused the pharmaceutical giant of concealing deaths during its COVID 19 vaccine trials. Among the allegations is the failure to disclose the death of a Kansas participant who was part of the BNT 162 b 2 vaccine trial. The death reportedly occurred 41 days after the participant received their second dose. The accusations stem from a detailed report led by doctor Jayanthi Konadasaan, an anesthetist and perioperative physician and a member of the Daily Clout research team. The team alleges that Pfizer's reporting practices during the critical juncture leading to the FDA's emergency use authorization for the vaccine were flawed with significant delays in documenting serious adverse events including deaths. The Pollak paper disclosed 6 deaths, 2 in the BNT 162 b 2 arm and 4 in the placebo arm. In the journal article and the EUA approval documentation, the 6 deaths covered the period of July 27, 2020 through November 14 2020, doctor Koonadasaan wrote in a letter sent to Kansas attorney general, Kris Kobach, who filed a lawsuit against Pfizer. Now we've included all of the details relating to that particular woman, the cover up that ensued, and all of the details you need to know on the Vigilant News Network article. We encourage everyone to read it in full. My concern, and I'm sure the concern of many other people, is this shedding issue and the confirmation of the shedding. And if people are now getting cancer who were not injected, what does that mean for the rest of us? Well, doctor Jessica Rose joins us now to discuss all of this. Doctor Jessica Rose, thank you so much for joining us again. We really appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: It's great to see you. Well, we've just gone over some real bombshells when it comes to the COVID saga. And of course, a lot of this is is, people had suspicions, but more and more we have evidence of, the shedding, the DNA contamination, and specifically your, recent substack relating to the new paper that confirms the presence of DNA in the vials, which settles the issues pertaining to DNA quantification methods, shows the spike persistence and exosomal shuttling or shedding. Talk to us through this, Doctor. Rose, please. Speaker 1: So this paper is really important, timing wise and also because of what they did. It's a very, very thorough study, that answered a lot of pending questions. We've established now, and by we, I mean independent scientists and researchers, that there absolutely is residual DNA in all of the vials that have been tested, the Pfizer and Moderna vials. And so that wasn't really up for, you know, it wasn't really up for debate. What we what we really wanna do is we wanna nail down, the degree of the residual DNA per lot. That would be a really nice thing to do. And, and other things like, how reliable are the quantification methods that have been used by, say, the manufacturers, by the regulatory bodies, and also by us. So these guys actually, they absolutely did find levels of DNA, we'll call it residual, that exceed the EMA guidelines by multiple, multiple folds. And this was after they removed interfering signals from RNA. So these are clean, real DNA signals that far exceed EMA limits. And they were able to establish this conclusion by measuring the DNA in 3 different ways. So this is no this is no shoddy piece of work that they did. The other thing I mean, this is to me, this is not surprising at all. It's it's just another piece in the puzzle that clarifies and provides additional evidence for what we already know. But they also looked at, basically they looked at shedding, whether or not it was a thing between the cells that they transfected. And what they were able to establish was that it absolutely is a thing. Exosomes that are, that are produced within the cells that contain spike protein and other stuff can traffic to other cells and also to the the, in this in this case, the cell culture milieu where you can imagine that because exosomes, their function in let's just talk about the human body for a second, their function in us is to kind of, provide a transformation oh, I'm sorry, a, an information highway between cells and tissues. So they can traffic information in the form of proteins and other things from cell to cell. So what their findings implicate is that when the spike protein is produced inside a transfected cell packaged in, in an exosome, that can be shed outside of that cell, pinched off from the cell, and make it to a neighbor cell or many neighbor cells, which basically means that spike can be brought very efficiently to other cells, to neighboring cells, and also trafficked around the body because exosomes go, you know, everywhere. So the other thing about that is that's that's kind of like the internal shedding, I suppose you could call it. But you can also exhale, exosomes that contain spike protein. So we're talking about shedding from person to person now, Whatever is inside those exosomes. And that's a big question. Speaker 0: Doctor. Rose, if I can just pause you there, people were previously concerned about, let's just say, intimate contact only. But this really shows the possibility of just being near someone that's breathing, really. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's that's exactly right. That's the interpretation of the results. Now the it's it's it's gonna depend on so many things. I mean, if you if you really wanna look at it like, I don't wanna get people thinking that if they're that they have to be afraid to be standing next to someone because everybody got injected. Don't think of it that way. It's like think of it like this. People have colds and flus all the time, and it doesn't prevent you from or it shouldn't prevent you from going outside and living a normal life. You're still, you know, in elevators with people who are coughing and sneezing, and most of the time you're fine. So think of it that way. Like, don't freak out. But, from from a from a biological standpoint, from a design of product standpoint, from an unanswered question prior to injecting billions of people standpoint, we have this on the table right now and we need to we need to do some follow-up research because, like, basically, what we need to do is we need to find out, you know, in the in the exhalation of somebody, let's say, are how many exosomes there are? Are there exosomes? What are they carrying, etcetera? I don't know that it's it's one of the thing the ways that we we can approach this. But, yeah, among the many things that this paper confirmed, that that one that point is, to me, it's it's it's the the best evidence that well, it's not the best. It's just another piece of evidence of shedding that we have. Doctor, Speaker 0: can I ask you about the the for people that don't In the injections, the fact that they found the presence of DNA in the injections? Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sorry. I keep it thinking everybody knows. All right. Well, the most important thing I can say about that is that it's not really supposed to be there. Now there are tolerable levels of DNA that you're allowed to have in, biologic polls like vaccines. However, these products are not conventional vaccines. The the nucleic acids that are being delivered are supposed to be only modified mRNA and, and and no DNA at all. And they're being delivered in, don't forget, in these lipid nanoparticles, and these are absolutely new experimental, efficient nucleic acid delivery systems to cells, to the inside of cells. Okay? So this this is a an efficient and brand new way to deliver this material to cells, and and this a a new level, a new threshold for the, for an acceptable level of, say, DNA delivered that way has has never we that that's not even been well, as long as or as far as we know, it's never been established. It haven't it hasn't even been looked at. We only have thresholds. These EMA thresholds that I mentioned are for naked DNA. So we need to reassess that whole thing. So basically, what I'm saying, I'll just follow that thought and then I'll go back, is that the levels of DNA that they're finding are 4 or 5 times higher than than those already way too high thresholds. If you ask me, there's no limit. There's no amount of DNA that's safe to be delivered in this way because of the downstream repercussions. Speaker 0: Which are? Speaker 1: If which are, in this case, in this paper, they found, all the pieces of DNA that are found in the plasmid that are is used to construct the modified mRNA. And we're talking about an SV 40 promoter enhancer, antibiotic resistance genes, and or an origin of replication, etcetera. So we have all the components that were used in the design of the original plasmid, which which basically just tells the story of where it came from. We already knew that because it had to have come from the the manufacturing process, and this DNA was simply just not removed efficiently, and it was carried over, wrapped up in the lipid nanoparticle to be delivered to you. The implications of this because of the types of DNA that we're finding, this is the most important point, like this SV 40 enhancer, is that specific plasmids or DNA pieces can be trafficked to the nucleus of cells where integration might be able to take place. The SV 40 enhancer is a gene therapy tool. This is documented in the literature, and it's a known thing. We know that it's in the vials, and it is functional. It's actually a gene therapy tool. So if you have let's just give an example. If you have the delivery of a small fragment of d of we'll call it contaminating DNA because it's not supposed to be there. It was delivered to the cell by the LNP by oxidant, and that thing gets integrated inside inside of a gene that's really important, let's just say a tumor suppressor gene, then you're gonna mess up the functionality of that gene, and things can go haywire. You can end up with cancer, for example. Which may Speaker 0: explain the huge rise in cancers. I wanna ask you, though, what about the shedding component where that is concerned? Because we're starting to see reports of even people who never got the injections exploding with cancers. Speaker 1: This needs to be investigated because that goes back to the question of what's actually being trapped in the exosomes. And Kevin McKernan is now on a new, research branch looking at the possibility of other kinds of plasmids being potentially passed from people to people. So this is brand news and it's speculative. So we're we're just we're kind of forming hypotheses now, so it's best not to to say anything conclusive. However, just to go back to the other point, we don't really need integration of a foreign DNA fragment, in order for cancer pathways to ensue. All you need is the introduction of foreign DNA to the cytosol to to start up certain cancer pathways. There's one called the c gas sting pathways. This is by the way, this is all published, which is why, you know, it when you're when you're using gene or I'm sorry, manufacturing processes, like making modified mRNA for use in this way, it's really, really, really important to make sure that you don't have contaminating elements at the end. That's why we purify the mRNA. Get rid of the DNA. Get rid of the lipopolysaccharide that comes with the the or, I'm sorry, the E. Coli bacteria that you use to grow up the plasmids, the DNA, that you want. We measure or by we, you know, the regulators, the manufacturers measure the DNA, the l lipopolysaccharide. They they do all this as par for the course, as part of good manufacturing practices, as part of having a a product that is what they're saying it is. So something along these lines went, went real haywire. Someone's not fessing up. There are some indications that they absolutely knew, you know, that that there was a DNA problem and that they've been cleaning this up as time has gone on, which is not acceptable because, again, the the the downstream effects are unknown. Just like your question, like, are are all of these cancers that are emergent in young, healthy people, for example, who weren't injected, are are are they are they getting injected by proxy? Because you know what I mean? Like, this is one of the questions I asked in my sub stack. It's like, are are we all just kind of introduced to these these elements of the manufacturing process by proxy? Is is that has that happened? I mean, it's it's a very interesting research question. My my answer would be yes. But, you know, you can't just think that something is true because it makes sense. You got to prove it. But I just want to point out on having said that, that none of this none of the onus on proving that these things aren't safe is is is on us. Again, I just want to reiterate this. It's like it's mind boggling to me that that a tiny, tiny handful of people scattered all over the world are the ones who are bringing this information to light. And and thank you as well for for giving us a platform because it's like, this is all the stuff that they were meant to do before. You know, it didn't it didn't matter what emergency there might have been. I mean, this seems like a bigger problem to me, obviously. Speaker 0: About to say this is an infinitely bigger emergency. The potential of, you know, all of us who, people who lost their jobs, people who lost their homes, people who went to extreme lengths to avoid this dangerous injection, now, you know, finding that, oh, what we were concerned about, the things we were called conspiracy theorists for for talking about shedding and talking about these other things. And and now it's all it's all coming to light. I mean, this is insane to me, and I suppose this is, you know, when we when we look at the one of the articles that we just reported on, you know, Pfizer accused of hiding deaths in the in the injection trials. This is also something we were talking about previously where they knew, they knew that women were miscarrying during the trials. They knew that people were dying during the trials, and yet nothing was revealed to the public. It's it this is just insane to me, doctor Rose, and more and more is coming out. And, and and another report that we just covered as well, the Hidden Pfizer report that shows heart conditions in the vaccinated are actually getting worse over time. I mean, it's it's Speaker 1: it's it's every day. I know. I exactly your reaction just now. There's a visceral reaction is is me now. It's like, I don't even understand. I just wrote it today. It's like there was, I think he was 29 or 39. In any case, that's a very young age. A Canadian guy who died of, and I think it was an aortic dissection, which basically means your aorta goes. And this was after he he had some kind of symptoms, probably chest pain. He went to the ER. He waited for 6 hours. Nothing happened. So he went home, and he ended up dying. And I'm like, this is the kind of story I just don't remember hearing before 2021. And now it's, like, every day. And I'm like, okay. It's it's you know, I'm trying to be rational and and calm about this, and it's like, okay. What's changed since you know what I mean? And it's like, how is it possible how is it possible that these these products haven't been removed from the market? Like like, this that's what we do when products look unsafe. It's just what Speaker 0: we I've said it so many times, doctor Rose. A defective head of lettuce turns up, and the whole country removes all the lettuce off the shelves. It's not hard. We're we're out of time today, doctor Rose, but I'm really, really grateful for your commentary. Obviously, I'm gonna continue tracking your research into this. Kevin McKernan doing a fantastic job as well. Please let people know where they can follow your work. Speaker 1: Just go to the the substacks. It's just Jessica 5b3 or just a car, and there's also my Twitter. I I'm I hate to say it, but I seem to post more on Twitter these days. There's more people following me, so I suppose my logic is that I'm gonna reach more people. But I really wonder if that's true. And that's the best love, MJK. Speaker 0: Thank you so much, doctor Rose. We appreciate it, and we'll speak to you again. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe, and it's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranches works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table. Why is good rancher's meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in 3 important points. 1, no antibiotics, hormones, or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. 2, steak house quality. The meat truly tastes better and you won't wanna go back. 3, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged, and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it's time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door. Subscribe to any box atgoodranches.comforward/vnn and use promo codevnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon, or ground beef with every order for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranches.comforward/vnn.

@BasedSamParker — Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Posted - March 27, 2025 at 12:03 AM

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 6:31 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I discussed the controversial actions of RFK Jr., who illegally moved his deceased wife's body despite a recent court victory allowing her burial in a specific location. This decision raised questions about potential blackmail, especially given his financial obligations to her family. I highlighted inconsistencies in the circumstances of her death, including a toxicology report showing no alcohol and signs she may have resisted the hanging. Additionally, RFK's connections to Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein, along with his history of allegations, suggest a complex web of potential blackmail.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🚨🧵1/ REWIND: RFK Jr. ILLEGALLY MOVED DEAD WIFE'S BODY IN 2012. Possible blackmail implications? What made this odd at the time is that he'd recently won a long & expensive court battle to be able to bury her in that original location, but then he undertook the illegal & controversial action to move the body. This could have opened him up to more legal battles when he already owed her family nearly $300k in legal bills.

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

RFK’s wife was good friends with Ghislane Maxwell She “killed herself” just like Epstein RFK dug up and moved her body with no permits This is unheard of and not a single other case of it happening This will help add insight on why RFK is okay killing Palestinian kids https://t.co/beCcOf9ffG

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵2/ In the article, we learn that RFK owed his dead wife's family nearly $300k, so it's weird that he'd open himself up to more expensive litigation by not getting a permit. As a lawyer, he also clearly knew better, but took the risk anyway. We also learn that it was an Alcoholics Anonymous friend who discovered the body--not RFK or the housekeeper as originally reported. This is immediately important. (cont)

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵3/ Plot Thickens: Mary Kennedy was a known alcoholic, but in the bombshell toxicology report, it was revealed she had no alcohol in her system and her anti-depressant levels were at the normal dosage. Who ever heard of an alcoholic NOT getting drunk or taking extra pills in a suicide attempt?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵4/ BOMBSHELL: MARY KENNEDY TRIED TO STOP THE SUICIDE The autopsy showed her fingers had been wedged between the rope and her neck--like someone would try to do to escape the noose! Furthermore, if you think "Maybe she wanted to remain lucid and in control"--a "rational" suicide--well, she didn't leave a note either! Taking the toxicology report, the autopsy report & the lack of a note together--1 nationally renowned medical examiner remarked who had been in charge of 9-11 victim forensics, and who had investigated many suicides by hanging, remarked "I've never seen that."

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵5/ RFK Jr. Admitted that his wife had "some kind of relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell" going back to at least 1993. And they flew on Epstein's plane multiple times. RFK's name was also in Epstein's black book. Who has "some kind of relationship" to a child sex trafficker close enough to get private jet trips?

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker states they were on Jeffrey Epstein's jet twice: once in 1993 with their wife and two children to visit their mother in Florida for Easter, facilitated by Glenn Maxwell, and another time with their family, including four children and their wife, to Rapid City, South Dakota, for fossil hunting. The speaker claims they were never on the jet alone and have been open about these trips from the beginning. They assert that these flights occurred before Epstein's nefarious activities were known. The speaker believes all information regarding Jeffrey Epstein and his connections to high-level political figures should be released to the public without redactions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You weren't ever on Jeffrey Epstein's jet, were you? I was on Jeffrey Epstein's jet two times. I was on it in 1993, and I was on it in and I went to Florida with my wife and two children to visit my mom over Easter. My wife had some kind of relationship with Glenn Maxwell and they offered us a ride to Palm Beach. So I went then and on another occasion I flew again with my family with I think four of my children and Mary my wife to Rapid City, South Dakota to go fossil hunting for a weekend. But other otherwise, I was I was never on his jet alone. I you know, I've been very open about this from from the beginning. This was in '93, so it was thirty years ago. It was before anybody knew about Jeffrey Epstein's, you know, his nefarious issues. And I agree with you that these all of this information should be released. And we we should get real answers on what happened to Jeffrey Epstein and any of the high level political people that he was involved with, all of that should be open to the public. It should be absolutely transparent. And, you know, I don't see why any of those records would have any redactions in them. Why would we be hiding that from the American public? Well, might

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵6/ @RyLiberty, an expert in Epstein research, reports that RFK Jr. & Mary both had a cozy relationship with the Epstein/Maxwell sex ring and that RFK is being blackmailed. https://t.co/G5nb7wY0P5

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵7/ Furthermore, RFK Jr. has a history of sexual assault allegations to go along with dozens of cases of secret cheating on his wife. Taken together with their close relationship with Maxwell/Epstein, this seems like extremely fertile ground for the development of blackmail material.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵8/ Lingering Questions: Isn't it strange that a savvy, experienced lawyer who had just won a hard fought & expensive court battle over the body--and who knows the law--would then so brazenly break the law only to move her body 700 feet? What tell-tale evidence might have been destroyed in such an illegal action?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@RyLiberty 🧵9/ Does anyone really think that RFK Jr. enjoys hanging out with this highly obnoxious & thoroughly disgusting troll who sells butt plugs & anal lube--while shilling for the country who murdered his father, uncle & (probably) his cousin? https://t.co/IdqGWNUmiR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵10/ What does "antisemitism" on college campuses have to do with vaccines & eating healthy? Why are resources of the Dept of HHS being brought to bear on a free speech issue? What does israel have on him? https://t.co/DrB7kEbVkI

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵11/ If you appreciate my research & time, please consider supporting me financially since Elon demonetized me. BuyMeACoffee, Venmo, PayPal, CashApp, crypto & more avaliable at the link below: Flow.page/SamParkerSenate

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🧵12/ Getting back to RFK & israeli blackmail, did you know they were blackmailing Nelson Rockefeller, the Dulles brothers & Prescott Bush? They love blackmail. Been doing it for a long time! 🧵👇 https://t.co/uXKvHmczA3

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱🧵1/ OCCUPIED! Nelson Rockefeller, 41st Vice President Of The United States--Was Blackmailed By Israel Jеwish Magazine "Ami" reports that the founder of the Mossad, Reuven Shiloah, blackmailed Nelson Rockefeller--but not just Rockefeller--the Dulles brothers (including Allen Dulles, the director of the CIA whom JFK fired & who later sat on the Warren Commission, investigating the JFK assassination), and Prescott Bush--father of George HW Bush (41st POTUS) & grandfather of George W. Bush (43rd POTUS). Nelson Rockefeller became VP under Gerald Ford after Nixon AND his VP Spiro Agnew were both forced to resign. It will be remembered that Nixon was captured on the White House tapes saying that something had to be done about the jеwish infiltration of the US government just a few months before the Watergate break-in that led to his downfall. Spiro Agnew was forced from his position through an early version of lawfare and maintained for the rest of his life that it had been a zionist plot after he divulged a disproportionate dominance of the media by jеws.

@JamesOKeefeIII — James O'Keefe

Posted - April 22, 2025 at 7:58 PM

Saved - April 30, 2025 at 10:50 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

James O'Keefe claims he is investigating individuals who send him anonymous messages, stating he is filming them without their knowledge. Dandelafe questions why he skipped visiting TriFilmPictures, to which O'Keefe promises significant revelations. TriFilmPictures accuses O'Keefe of being a false prophet and dismisses his claims about receiving threatening messages. O'Keefe counters by alleging that TriFilmPictures' associates are fearful. TriFilmPictures argues that O'Keefe lacks journalistic integrity and suggests that no one is plotting against him.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

The people I’m investigating right now are angry. They send me these anonymous messages because they don’t have the balls to message me in real name. That’s OK. I’m filming them without their knowledge, visiting them at their homes and asking them for comment. I’m serious. https://t.co/qgscBWIqIo

@dandelafe - Daniel de la Fé

@JamesOKeefeIII Hey, James, how come you didn't stop by @TriFilmPictures's place today? You visited a bunch of others in the area but skipped over him for some reason. https://youtu.be/MGpYJs0hGds?si=V8VRhF3mYynCK2x3

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

@dandelafe @TriFilmPictures You have no idea what’s about to be exposed. It’s going to be biblical.

@TriFilmPictures - Kalen Eriksson

@JamesOKeefeIII @dandelafe No one so desperately stresses piety like a false prophet

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

@TriFilmPictures @dandelafe No one is as demonic as someone who literally texts “hail Satan” from an anonymous number. Your friends are terrified.

@TriFilmPictures - Kalen Eriksson

@JamesOKeefeIII @dandelafe Someone with a Jersey number actually texting you “hail satan”, is as real as you fake calling an FBI agent and posting videos from gyms you haven’t been to in over two years. Try again

@TriFilmPictures - Kalen Eriksson

I won’t “look” in any way, but thank you for confirming foregoing journalistic integrity in order to frame a desired narrative. The stark reality is that no one is scheming against you, or plotting, or seething. Quite simply, no one thinks of you. I wish your needed fundraising push with two year old text messages of people you abandoned, much success.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - June 5, 2025 at 7:10 PM

Saved - June 6, 2025 at 7:12 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elon Musk claimed that Donald Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files, suggesting this is why they remain private. Alex Jones urged Trump to respond, noting his lack of press interaction. Another participant discussed the current debt situation, asserting that the debt limit has already been surpassed due to spending approved during Biden's presidency. They argued that failing to raise the debt limit would lead to default and significant consequences, emphasizing the need for bipartisan cooperation to avoid jeopardizing the MAGA agenda.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

@elonmusk @realDonaldTrump Trump needs to respond asap. I notice he did not take questions at his public meeting today.

@kissmychicken - Natalie Rizzo

From @unseen1_unseen Okay, for those that don't know. We have already surpassed the current debt limit due to spending already approved during Biden's term. Sec Yellen said it would be reached back in Jan 2025. The freedom clowns wouldn't increase the debt limit with the CR back in Dec and saddled Trump with a debt limit that had already/would shortly be reached as he entered office. They did that on purpose to box in Trump from having bills for immigration and deportationsnas single issue bills. Remember the debate over one or two bills? Yeah, see how that works. But thanks to a good tax season, tarrifs, some fancy footwork by Sec bessent, a total freeze on hiring/spending, lay offs, doge cuts, etc, we have been able to avoid defaulting. Surprising the swamp critters, but the end is in sight, and now it's thought Aug 2025 will be when we can no longer pay our bills due to the fake debt limit, and we default or go hat in hand to the dems. So those making the argument that we don't need to raise the debt limit are either uninformed or liars. If you remove the debt limit increase from the BBB, the Senate will have to get dem votes to increase it before Aug since it would then require 60 votes. Getting those votes will further derail the MAGA agenda as they will demand a price for their votes. Do you understand how the swamp works now? There's zero possibility that the debt limit won't be increased. It will. The only question is, do we do it now and not worry about it for the next 4 years, or do we pay the price the dems/swamp will demand and give up much of the maga agenda? Rand paul knows this. Elon should know this. Massie knows this. They all hope you don't know this because their entire argument falls apart if you do. The only other option is default, and that would cause untold misery. But believe the clowns if you want, and in Aug, we will be debating the debt limit increase and what the dems get for their votes. I'm also 100% sure when/if that debate happens both Massie and Paul will be No votes so they can pretend to be principled about the debt while we see the massive price tag they caused us to pay for something that would have been free with the BBB.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - June 5, 2025 at 7:10 PM

Saved - June 6, 2025 at 9:19 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elon Musk claimed that Donald Trump is linked to the Epstein files, suggesting this is why they remain unreleased. Alex Jones urged Trump to respond, noting his lack of press interaction. A user discussed the debt limit, arguing that spending approved during Biden's term has already surpassed it, creating a financial bind for Trump. They asserted that failing to raise the debt limit would lead to default and significant consequences, while also criticizing some politicians for their stance on the issue. Another user connected this to past Democratic actions.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

@elonmusk @realDonaldTrump Trump needs to respond asap. I notice he did not take questions at his public meeting today.

@kissmychicken - Natalie Rizzo

From @unseen1_unseen Okay, for those that don't know. We have already surpassed the current debt limit due to spending already approved during Biden's term. Sec Yellen said it would be reached back in Jan 2025. The freedom clowns wouldn't increase the debt limit with the CR back in Dec and saddled Trump with a debt limit that had already/would shortly be reached as he entered office. They did that on purpose to box in Trump from having bills for immigration and deportationsnas single issue bills. Remember the debate over one or two bills? Yeah, see how that works. But thanks to a good tax season, tarrifs, some fancy footwork by Sec bessent, a total freeze on hiring/spending, lay offs, doge cuts, etc, we have been able to avoid defaulting. Surprising the swamp critters, but the end is in sight, and now it's thought Aug 2025 will be when we can no longer pay our bills due to the fake debt limit, and we default or go hat in hand to the dems. So those making the argument that we don't need to raise the debt limit are either uninformed or liars. If you remove the debt limit increase from the BBB, the Senate will have to get dem votes to increase it before Aug since it would then require 60 votes. Getting those votes will further derail the MAGA agenda as they will demand a price for their votes. Do you understand how the swamp works now? There's zero possibility that the debt limit won't be increased. It will. The only question is, do we do it now and not worry about it for the next 4 years, or do we pay the price the dems/swamp will demand and give up much of the maga agenda? Rand paul knows this. Elon should know this. Massie knows this. They all hope you don't know this because their entire argument falls apart if you do. The only other option is default, and that would cause untold misery. But believe the clowns if you want, and in Aug, we will be debating the debt limit increase and what the dems get for their votes. I'm also 100% sure when/if that debate happens both Massie and Paul will be No votes so they can pretend to be principled about the debt while we see the massive price tag they caused us to pay for something that would have been free with the BBB.

@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere

@kissmychicken @RealAlexJones @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @unseen1_unseen 4b)Applied for SANCTUARY AND EFFECTIVELY ASKED TO USE YOUR DOLLARS TO HARM YOU! THE NEWS SINCE 2008 OBAMA AND THE CARAVANS THE DEMOCRATS CAUSED BY WAY OF HONDURAN COUP THEY HELPED CAUSE THE MOVEMENT YOU SEE BEFORE YOU . QUOTE THAT! YOULL SEE HOW FAR BACK THE DEMONCRATS HAVE BEEN

@BillyM2k — Shibetoshi Nakamoto

Posted - July 12, 2025 at 11:53 PM

Saved - July 16, 2025 at 6:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A user criticized a post for being poorly executed, highlighting that it mentioned "Epstein" multiple times while urging others to stop discussing him. In response, another user agreed and called for the release of promised files related to the topic.

@BillyM2k - Shibetoshi Nakamoto

this is in the running for worst post ever made https://t.co/UtnilB69bz

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@BillyM2k Seriously. He said “Epstein” half a dozen times while telling everyone to stop talking about Epstein. Just release the files as promised.

@KevinSpacey — Kevin Spacey

Posted - July 15, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Saved - July 16, 2025 at 12:40 AM

@KevinSpacey - Kevin Spacey

Release the Epstein files. All of them. For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can’t come soon enough. I hate to make this about me — but the media already has.

@adamscochran — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Posted - August 5, 2025 at 11:43 PM

Saved - August 6, 2025 at 8:35 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I found an intriguing article from The New York Times featuring Epstein's home and notable figures like Trump and Musk, but it overlooked a crucial photo. This image shows Epstein with Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, a key Emirati businessman linked to the Port of Djibouti, which Epstein allegedly used for smuggling. Evidence suggests Epstein had connections to arms deals and smuggling operations dating back to the 1980s. My research indicates that this photo could confirm Epstein's ties to smuggling activities, particularly involving weapons and drugs, through established networks.