reSee.it - Related Post Feed

ColumbiaBugle
Posted - November 21, 2021 at 4:45 PM
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 8:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m tracking the Ray Epps/J6 thread: questioning why Epps faced no charges, noting Revolver News’ claims of FBI protection and scrubbed lists, and citing Tucker Carlson, Darren Beattie, and Rep. Massie pressing Garland. I reference new FBI informant chatter, unindicted co-conspirators, and calls for answers on federal agents’ presence and possible foreknowledge.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

.@joerogan Discussing The Curious Case Of Ray Epps & January 6th "He did it pre-January 6th, he did it during the January 6th thing, and that this guy has faced no legal charges whatsoever, and people are like well wtf is going on here?" https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion centers on alleged agent provocateur involvement in January 6. Speakers describe a theory that "federal agents ... instigating the violence, instigating the entering into the capital," and point to "this one guy" who is isolated on video yet faced no legal consequences. They discuss "Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital," and contrast him with others prosecuted. They debate whether the provocateur acted under government direction, was radicalized, or acted independently as a psycho, noting "this guy's doing this, like, over and over again." They reference the World Trade Organization in Seattle as a precedent for provocateurs, and note "100,000 different cameras" enabled scrutiny. A concern is raised about "an autocratic government that controls all aspects of society so none of this ever happens."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you aware of the agent provocateur aspect of January 6? Speaker 1: Say more. Speaker 0: I don't exactly know what the reality is, but the what people insinuating is that there was federal agents that were involved in instigating the violence, instigating the entering into the capital, and that there's this one guy in specific that they've got him isolated on video. They've shown him over and over again. He's faced no legal consequences. They know this guy's name. They know exactly who he is. All these other guys are in jail. All these other guys who got into the capital, I mean, so many of them are facing, like, these massive federal charges and four years plus in jail. This one guy is like, we have to go in there. We have to take back. We have to get inside there. And people start calling him a thud in in one one of these videos, and I think he, like, takes off and runs away. But this is what it seems like. It seems like and this is something that governments have done forever. Mhmm. Right? You take a peaceful protest. What's the best way to break up a peaceful protest? You bring in agent provocateurs to turn it into a non peaceful, a violent protest, smash windows, light things on fire, then you can send in the troops and you can clean up the mess, and then you don't have any protest anymore. This was the World Trade Organization in where was it? In Seattle in '99 or whatever it was. That's what they did. And it's been documented that that is what happened. I mean, like, literal government agents went in wearing antifa outfits and starts this is pre antifa. Right? Smashing windows, lighting things on fire, and they were all eventually released conveniently. Well, this guy do you know about this, Jamie? You know what? See if you can find it. Because it's a curious case of this one particular individual who's, like, yelling in these various groups that we have to get in there where and it like, he did it pre January 6. They did it during the January 6 thing, and then these guys faced no legal charges whatsoever. And people are like, well, what the fuck is going on here? Because when you see some kind of organized debacle like that and then you see people insisting that we have to take this further and we have to go inside. And then if you find out that those people are actually federal agents Mhmm. That are doing that, you're like, well, what is happening here? And how is that possible? And how is this legal? That's a problem. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean Speaker 2: I haven't seen this one. I remember the umbrella man who was breaking windows at the George Floyd riots. Speaker 0: I think they found out that that guy was a cop and that I think that was like a rogue human, but no. I'm not sure if that's true. Speaker 2: But So this is where it's interesting with in this case, I don't know the case at all, but is it that somebody in government actually initiated him doing it as an agent provocateur to shut down the protest, or was he someone who happened to be in government who was himself radicalized who acting on his own because of radicalization did the thing? Speaker 0: Or is he an agent provocateur but he's doing so independently just because he's a fucking psycho? You know, some firemen start fires. Speaker 1: Right. But notice that's, like, whichever view you have, you probably had a motivated interest to see it that way. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. I didn't have any view on it. Right. That's the thing. I'm looking at it like this. Like, what is it? What is this video? Yeah. I'm watching this guy eat like, this one big beefy looking federal agent guy telling them they gotta go inside, and I think he was wearing a MAGA hat. And, you know, it was like a guy in his fifties then and he's like, I'll you what we gotta do. We gotta get inside there. We gotta go inside the Capitol. Speaker 1: And these people are like, inside? Like, isn't that illegal? Like, what the fuck? Speaker 0: This guy's taking it to the next level. But he's doing it, like, multiple times. That's the the the there's a there is a real problem with intelligence agencies doing that kind of shit. Totally. Because they do do it. And I think they do it thinking that this is like these group of fucking psychos, like, we gotta stop this from escalating, so here's the way. We get them to do something really stupid, then we can put fences up and create a green zone, and then we lock this down. Meet Ray Epps. Fucking ad clicks. Meet Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital. So let's watch some of this because it's fucking crazy. It's really weird. This guy is doing this, like, over and over and over again. Speaker 3: Yeah. This was there's a video of it, but this is an article about Speaker 0: probably So this is an article that's in Revolver. Speaker 3: Hold on. I'll get the video. Speaker 0: We'll find the video because the video is fucking strange. Ray Epps' video. Speaker 3: Here it is. Speaker 4: Like this. Well, that's twenty minutes long. Speaker 0: Well, just watch we'll see some of it. Oh, these are guys that are watching it. What about that one? Speaker 3: That's goes to a website. These are on Twitter. Speaker 0: Arrest rave apps. So so people are some people are hip to it. But most people, like, including you guys, have no idea that this is a a person. Right? You've never heard of this before. What terrifies me is a solution of this is an autocratic government that controls all aspects of society so none of this ever happens. That scares the shit out of me because that seems to be where there's that fuck. Let's play this. Speaker 1: The capital. What? Tomorrow? Speaker 0: Wait. Do it from the beginning. Speaker 1: I don't even like to say Tomorrow. I'm not We need to go into the capital. Jesus. Hang on. Into the capital. What? Tomorrow? Speaker 0: Either what? Speaker 1: I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Speaker 0: Shut the fuck up, boomer. Speaker 1: To the Capitol. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there? No? When we go in? Are we gonna get arrested if go out there? Yeah. You don't need to get shot. You're gonna arrest us all? Speaker 0: Okay. I think we see enough. There's a lot of instances. It goes on for quite a while. There's a lot of videos of this guy, is really fascinating because I think these methods that they've used forever are kinda subverted by social media because you have a 100,000 different cameras pointed at this guy from all these and when someone starts screaming loudly, people start filming it, and then you get a conglomeration or or collection of these rather. Mhmm. And you can go, oh, what is happening here? Like like, I don't think they've realized that people would be so cynical that they would go over all these various videos and find this one guy who's not being prosecuted or arrested. Speaker 1: He's not being prosecuted or arrested. Speaker 0: Ting. Congratulations. Speaker 1: Yeah. Know. No. He's not. Speaker 0: Look at that guy. Yeah. I mean, if you had a guess, if you had, like, $50, what are you gonna put your your chips on? Red or black?
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement? revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Revolver News: Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears To Have Led The Very First 1/6 Attack On The U.S. Capitol https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Meet Ray Epps. Fucking yeah. At close. Meet Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital. So let's watch some of this because it's fucking crazy. It's really weird. This guy is doing this, like, over and over and over again. Yeah. This was there's a video of it. This is an article about Oh. So this is an article that's in revolver. Hold on. I'll get the video. We'll find the video because the the video is fucking strange. Ray Epps' video. Here it is. Like this. Well, that's twenty minutes long. Well, just watch. We'll see some of it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meet Ray Epps. Fucking yeah. At close. Meet Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital. So let's watch some of this because it's fucking crazy. It's really weird. This guy is doing this, like, over and over and over again. Yeah. This was there's a video of it. This is an article about Oh. So this is an article that's in revolver. Hold on. I'll get the video. We'll find the video because the the video is fucking strange. Ray Epps' video. Here it is. Like this. Well, that's twenty minutes long. Well, just watch. We'll see some of it.
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement? revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Must Watch! @DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6 Who Is Ray Epps? https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement? revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

.@DarrenJBeattie: "The FBI scrubbed Epps' face from their public database just a day after Revolver ran a report on fellow Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes. Who is also unindicted." Revolver News On Epps: https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/ Revolver News On Rhodes: https://www.revolver.news/2021/06/stewart-rhodes-oath-keepers-missing-link-fbi-unindicted-co-conspirator/

Video Transcript AI Summary
"He is calling for going into the capital the evening before January 6." "And this isn't just a one off, someone some crazy who comes and goes. No." "He goes repeatedly to group after group, redirecting them saying, we need to go into the capital." "on January 6, it's a veritable, where's Waldo? He's everywhere." "twenty seconds before the very first breach of the capital, this individual Ray Epps whispers into someone's ear," "So he's everywhere." "But what it did do is said that Ray Epps was acting alone." "the FBI scrubbed Epps's face from their database, from their public database, just a day after Revolver ran a report on his fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes, who is also unindicted."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are some of the key points about Ray Epps in the revolver.news article that you mentioned. First, and we got some of an idea from this from the clips you presented. He is calling for going into the capital the evening before January 6. And this isn't just a one off, someone some crazy who comes and goes. No. He goes repeatedly to group after group, redirecting them saying, we need to go into the capital. And sure enough, on January 6, it's a veritable, where's Waldo? He's everywhere. He's all around the capital shepherding people to go to the capital where quote, our problems are. And then, twenty seconds before the very first breach of the capital, this individual Ray Epps whispers into someone's ear, then twenty second later we have the very first breach. So he's everywhere. And as you pointed out, very curiously, Ray Epps is not indicted. It doesn't seem like the feds want him or have any interest in him. Although they did. They had him for a while on their most wanted page until revolver.news did a report. Now what's the significance of this timing? Well, there there are two things. For one, there is a New York Times piece that had come out that essentially ran cover for the feds but did it in a way that was counterproductive. It amplified the name of Epps, which wasn't convenient for the feds after Revolver had reported that the feds were likely involved in one six. But what it did do is said that Ray Epps was acting alone. And as you can see in this revolver. News piece, Ray Epps seemed to be coordinating with a number of people in this initial breach, and many of those people also remained curiously unindicted. But perhaps the most damning thing, the FBI scrubbed Epps's face from their database, from their public database, just a day after Revolver ran a report on his fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes, who is also unindicted. So there's just a cast of curious characters unindicted. Speaker 1: It's it's a really provocative and very detailed, very well reported piece that, again, I would recommend to everyone watching tonight. Terren Biedith, we will talk to you again. Speaker 0: Thank Speaker 1: you so much.
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement? revolver.news
Federal Protection of “Oath Keepers” Kingpin Stewart Rhodes Breaks The Entire Capitol “Insurrection” Lie Wide Open - Revolver News Is the FBI protecting “Oath Keeper” kingpin Stewart Rhodes from federal charges because he's one of theirs? Did Rhodes entrap his people? revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Must Watch! @DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6 Who Is Ray Epps? https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/meet-ray-epps-the-fed-protected-provocateur-who-appears-to-have-led-the-very-first-1-6-attack-on-the-u-s-capitol/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats say we need to find out exactly what happened on January 6, and actually we strongly agree with that. Thomas Massey of Kentucky confronted Merrick Garland with footage of a man called Ray Epps, who apparently lives in Arizona. Epps was in Washington the night before, January 5, encouraging Trump supporters to enter the Capitol Building illegally. "Here's a guy telling Trump supporters they need to break the law and go into the capital. That's real video." "And then they accuse him of being an undercover federal agent. That's pretty interesting." Massey asked, "Has he been indicted? Who or where is he exactly?" Garland refused to answer, saying he would not comment on an ongoing investigation or "how many federal operatives were there in the crowd that day." We don't know whether this Epps guy was working with the federal government. A Revolver News piece notes the FBI removed a photo of Epps from its most wanted page after their reporting; it says "Ray Epps is everywhere" on Jan 6, and "twenty seconds before the very first breach" he whispers. The FBI scrubbed Epps' face a day after Revolver reported on Rhodes; the host calls it "awfully weird" and invites Epps to appear.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you keep hearing democrats say we need to find out exactly what happened on January 6, and actually we strongly agree with that. At a recent hearing in congress, Thomas Massey of Kentucky confronted our highly partisan attorney general Merrick Garland with this footage. It's of a man called Ray Epps, who apparently lives in Arizona. Epps was in Washington the night before, January 5. He was encouraging Trump supporters to enter the Capitol Building illegally. He said it numerous times. Now, in this clip, some people in the crowd immediately decided this guy must be working for the federal government. Watch this. Speaker 1: We need to go in to the Capitol. Let's go. I'm gonna put it out there. Speaker 0: So here's a guy telling Trump supporters they need to break the law and go into the capital. That's real video. And they say no. And then they accuse him of being an undercover federal agent. That's pretty interesting. That guy was on tape encouraging people to break the law, organizing what happened that day. Has he been indicted? Who or where is he exactly? Well, Congressman Massey asked the attorney general about that, and the attorney general refused to answer. He also pointedly refused to say how many federal operatives were there in the crowd that day on January 6. Speaker 2: As far as we can find, this individual has not been charged with anything. You said this is one of the most sweeping investigations in history. Have you seen that video, or those frames from that video? Speaker 3: So, as I said at the outset, one of the norms of the justice department is to not comment on impending investigations, and particularly not to comment about, particular scenes or particular individuals. Speaker 2: Can you tell us without talking about particular incidents or particular videos how many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January 6, whether they agitated to go into the capital and if any of them did. Speaker 3: And so I'm not gonna violate this norm of, of of, the rule of law. I'm not gonna comment on an investigation that's ongoing. Speaker 2: Oh, I just wanna violate the rule Speaker 0: of law, says the guy who just called the angry parents terrorists. And of course, the DOJ leaks all the time the details of tons of different investigations that are politically useful to them. Now just to be totally clear, we don't know whether this Epps guy was working with the federal government. We don't know anything about him. We haven't talked to him. We can only show you video from that day. But we do know it doesn't seem like he's been punished for this. If you're looking for the people who organized that day, maybe you should talk to him. Has he been indicted? Not that we know of. Maybe he has been. We don't know it. But we haven't seen any evidence that he has been. A new piece in Revolver News notes that the FBI removed a photo of Ray Epps from its most wanted page this summer right after Revolver News reported on the story. Darren Beatty is with Revolver News. He runs it. He joins us tonight. Darren, thanks so much for coming on. So I would recommend you you have an enormously detailed piece today up on your site really doing the reporting that legacy news organizations ought to be doing and absolutely aren't. And I recommend it to to to our viewers. But tell us specifically, we don't know the truth, but I what have you found out about this man encouraging others to break the law in Washington? Speaker 4: Yeah. So here are some of the key points about Ray Epps in the revolver.news article that you mentioned. First, and we got some of an idea from this from the clips you presented. He is calling for going into the capital the evening before January 6. And this isn't just a one off, someone some crazy who comes and goes. No. He goes repeatedly to group after group, redirecting them saying, we need to go into the capital. And sure enough, on January 6, it's a veritable, where's Waldo? He's everywhere. He's all around the capital shepherding people to go to the capital where, quote, our problems are. And then, twenty seconds before the very first breach of the capital, this individual Ray Epps whispers into someone's ear, then twenty second later we have the very first breach. So he's everywhere. And as you pointed out, very curiously, Ray Epps is not indicted. It doesn't seem like the feds want him or have any interest in him. Although they did. They had him for a while on their most wanted page until revolver.news did a report. Now what's the significance of this timing? Well, there there are two things. For one, there is a New York Times piece that had come out that essentially ran cover for the feds, but Speaker 1: did it in a way that was counterproductive. It amplified the name of Epps, which wasn't convenient for the feds after Revolver had reported that the Feds were likely involved in one six. But what it did do is said that Ray Epps was acting alone. And as you can see in this revolver. News piece, Ray Epps seemed to be coordinating with a number of people in this initial breach, and many of those people also remained curiously unindicted. But perhaps the most damning thing, the FBI scrubbed Epps' face from their database, from their public database, just a day after Revolver ran a report on his fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes, who is also unindicted. So there's just a cast of curious characters unindicted. It's it's a really provocative and very detailed, very well reported piece that, again, I would recommend to everyone watching tonight. Terri Benite, we will talk to you again. Thank you so much. Thank you. Speaker 4: Thank you. Speaker 0: And by the way, just to restate, we don't know the truth of this at all. It's awfully weird, though. I think any reasonable person would agree. Ray Epps is always welcome on this show. We always want to hear directly from people. So if you are Ray Epps and you're watching, please call us because we'd love to have you as soon as you want.
Meet Ray Epps: The Fed-Protected Provocateur Who Appears to Have Led the Very First 1/6 Attack on the US Capitol - Revolver News In order to protect the country from fictional right-wing "patriot" groups, did the FBI become an insurrectionist "patriot" movement? revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

.@RepThomasMassie Questioning Attorney General Garland About Whether There Were Federal Agents Present On 1/6 & Whether They Agitated To Go Into The Capitol Attorney General Garland Refuses To Answer #GarlandHearing

Video Transcript AI Summary
"There's a concern that there were agents of the government or assets of the government present on January 5 and January 6, during the protests." "I'm need afraid I can't see that at all." "Alright. You have you have those images there, and they're captioned. They were from January 5 and January 6." "As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he'll probably go to jail, he'll probably be arrested, but he wants every but they need to go into the capital the next day, is then the next day directing people to the capital." "And as far as we can find, this individual has not been charged with anything." "One of the norms of the justice department is to not comment on impending investigations and particularly not to comment about, particular scenes or particular individuals." "So I'm not gonna violate this norm of, of of, the rule of law. I'm not gonna comment on an investigation that's ongoing."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a concern that there were agents of the government or assets of the government present on January 5 and January 6, during the protests, and, I've got some pictures that I wanna show you if the, my staff could bring those to you. Speaker 1: I'm need afraid I can't see that at all. Speaker 0: Alright. You have you have those images there, and they're captioned. They were from January 5 and January 6. As far as we can determine, the individual who was saying he'll probably go to jail, he'll probably be arrested, but he wants every but they need to go into the capital the next day, is then the next day directing people to the capital. And as far as we can find, this individual has not been charged with anything. You said this is one of the most sweeping investigations in the history. Have you seen that video or those frames from that video? Speaker 1: So as I, said at the outset, one of the norms of the justice department is to not comment on impending investigations and particularly not to comment about, particular scenes or particular individuals. Speaker 0: This is Okay. Without I I was hoping today to give you an opportunity to put to rest the concerns that people have that there were federal agents or assets of the federal government present on January 5 and January 6. Can you tell us without talking about particular incidents or particular videos, how many agents or assets of the federal government were present on January 6, whether they agitated to go into the capital, and if any of them did? Speaker 1: So I'm not gonna violate this norm of, of of, the rule of law. I'm not gonna comment on an investigation that's ongoing.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

I just played this video for AG Merrick Garland. He refused to comment on how many agents or assets of the federal government were present in the crowd on Jan 5th and 6th and how many entered the Capitol.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contemplates marching on the Capitol, acknowledging the risk of arrest. They say, 'I know. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright.' They urge action with, 'We need to go in to the capital. Let's go.' They preface with, 'I'm gonna put it out there,' and confess, 'I'm probably gonna go to jail tomorrow.' The message centers on a planned entry into the Capitol and the likelihood of facing jail, repeating the call to action 'We need to go into the capital.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in to the capital. Let's go. I'm gonna put it out there. I'm probably gonna go to jail tomorrow. We need to go into the capital.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Tucker Carlson & @ElijahSchaffer Discuss What Happened On 1/6 & The Mysterious Case Of Ray Epps Tucker: “Based on what you saw personally, did Ray Epps seem to be encouraging people to break the law that day?” Elijah: “100 percent.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elijah Schaefer, Blaze Media reporter inside the Capitol, describes trying to share footage with the public. He recalls a Blaze Media CEO warning 'they're coming after you already' and says a sitting member of Congress, Eric Swalwell, was 'weaponizing the FBI publicly and tagging them and getting my name out there' against him. He alleges the FBI was leaking information to reporters and that someone was 'investigating me for wiretapping charges.' Schaefer says he saw near Ray Ebs a man who 'instigated' the violence; a megaphone caller urged '1776, the front gate,' but people did not initially join. After Ebs whispered to individuals, violence escalated. He contends the federal government says, 'we're just not interested in him.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna begin tonight by speaking to someone who was there. Now a lot of the footage that is aired on all kinds of different channels was shot by a man called Elijah Schaefer. He was a reporter in the crowd that day, and he's followed the aftermath of that day as well. He joins us now. Elijah, thanks so much for joining us. So since you were there, you're right up front, at the tip of the spear as they always say in Washington. It didn't seem long from the perspective of people watching this on TV before this became harnessed by political interests in order to make political points. Did you see that happening? Speaker 1: Yeah. I got a call while I was inside of the capital documenting, by the way, and working my hardest to get the footage out to the public to show them what was happening. That's that's my job, simply put. What is going on, the the public deserved to know what was happening. Yes. And as I'm getting the footage out, I get a call from the CEO of my company, Blaze Media, and he's telling me they're coming after you already. People are alerting the FBI. And what really shocked me is in the process of this, a sitting member of congress, representative Eric Swalwell, was already weaponizing the FBI publicly and tagging them and getting my name out there knowing that I'm a federally credentialed reporter, doing my job alongside other left wing outlets, but chose to begin to weaponize the FBI in the middle of this event against a political adversary. Speaker 0: Wait. A a sitting member of congress is trying to clamp down on the reporting taking place in real time by using the FBI? Speaker 1: Yeah. He actually did. And and realistically speaking, I know that it succeeded because the FBI even shortly after this started leaking information to reporters saying, not even that I knew of or my my attorney didn't know, but he started leaking information. Somebody is saying that they were, investigating me for wiretapping charges. I didn't know about this. They wouldn't tell us about this, but the FBI was not only leaking information to liberal reporters, but already a sitting member of congress was boasting about about alerting the FBI saying, oh, here he is. Check him out, knowing for sure that I have a credential in DC to be covering these types of events and had been successfully doing so for the entire year of 2020 was BLM and Antifa. Speaker 0: It's terrifying, and you have to ask why. So why were they so intent on shutting down your reporting and the reporting the honest reporting of others? So you were happened to be standing very close to a man called Ray Epps, who was a leader of what we're told is a right wing extremist group. He has not been indicted. Based on what you saw personally, did Ray Epps seem to be encouraging people to break the law that day? Speaker 1: 100%. I I did not see any violence occurring. I don't think anybody that was at the front lines went with the intent to do anything other than to protest peacefully. There were barriers, but there was one individual who was whispering in people's ears, the very people that instigated the attacks, the ones who pushed the barrier, who are being prosecuted for injuring a capital officer, a female who wasn't wearing a helmet, who still has head injuries to this day, I I found out. They're all being prosecuted, but the man who instigated it, who was who was starting the violence, for some reason the FBI is no longer interested in him. And I've spoken to prosecutors, I've spoken to defense attorneys because obviously that's my footage. I was a key witness. I was there. And if there's anybody that I would pick out as a journalist and say that's the man who would be key suspect number one. For some reason, the federal government says, well, we're just not interested in him. Speaker 0: So we have a lot of tape before encouraging people to break the law and to break into the capital, and people clearly think that he's a federal agent. They call him that. But with your own eyes, you saw this same man encouraging people to. Just wanna be totally clear. You saw this yourself. Speaker 1: Yeah. I will say this. There was a man on a on a bullhorn or a megaphone, and he was yelling to people to 1776, the front gate. People were not going along though. People were kinda like, oh man, they started saying, you're Antifa, and they started yelling at him. So people were not going along with with with acts of violence or encouraging to escalate things. It did not escalate until well, who we now as identified as Ray Ebs began whispering in the ears of certain individuals, which led immediately after to the instigation of violence. Speaker 0: You're saying this in public. It's on videotape, and this man has not been indicted, and no one in the judge department will explain why. And anyone who asks the question is denounced as some sort of conspiracy theorist. Conspiracy theories are starting to sound like spoiler alerts at this point. I'm grateful for your original reporting on that day. Elijah Schaefer, thank you very much. Speaker 1: Thank you.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

#Thread Must Watch Tucker Carlson Segment On Revolver News's Piece About January 6th: Unindicted Co-Conspirators In January 6th Cases Raise Disturbing Questions Of Federal Foreknowledge

Video Transcript AI Summary
Why are there still so many facts we don't understand about January 6, and why is the Biden administration preventing us from knowing? The claim they are hiding more than ten thousand hours of surveillance tape is questioned, with Revolver News offering an answer. The government allegedly hiding the identity of many law enforcement officers who participated in the riot, with some named as unindicted co conspirators. Person two and person three are described as organizers, with Caldwell linked to a quick reaction force and not charged. Revolver News says there are upwards of 20 unindicted co conspirators in the Oathkeeper indictments. The piece asserts the insurrection was organized at least in part by government agents. It cites the FBI director's admission of infiltrating dissident groups, contrasts informant roles with paying people to organize violence, and discusses Whitmer and Garland; a former FBI official talks about rounding up dissent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And speaking of January 6, why are there still so many things, basic factual matters that we don't understand about that day? Why is the Biden administration preventing us from knowing? Why is the administration still hiding more than ten thousand hours of surveillance tape from The US capital on January 6? What could possibly be the reason for that? Even as they call for more openness, we need to get to the bottom of it. They could release those tapes today, but they're not. Why? We ought to be asking those questions urgently because as the attorney general reminded us today, a lot depends on the answers. And at least one news organization is asking that. Revolver News. It's a new site. It turned out to be one of the last honest outlets on the Internet. A new piece on revolver.news suggests an answer to some of these questions. We know that the government is hiding the identity of many law enforcement officers who are present at the capital on January 6, not just the one who killed Ashley Babbitt. According to the government's own court filings, those law enforcement officers participated in the riot, sometimes in violent ways. We know that because without fail, the government has thrown the book at most people who are present in the Capitol on January 6. There was a nationwide dragnet to find them, and many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight. But strangely, some of the key people who participated on January 6 have not been charged. Look at the document. The government calls those people unindicted co conspirators. What does that mean? Well, it means that in potentially every single case, they were FBI operatives, really, in the capital on January 6. For example, one of those unindicted co conspirators is someone government documents identify only as person two. According to those documents, person two stayed in the same hotel room as a man called Thomas Caldwell, an insurrectionist, a man alleged to be a member of the group, the Oath Keepers. Person two also, quote, stormed the barricades at the capital on January 6 alongside Thomas Caldwell. The government's indictments further indicate that Caldwell, by the way is a 65 year old man, yes dangerous insurrectionist, was led to believe there would be a quote quick reaction force also participating on January 6. That quick reaction force Kolwa was told would be led by someone called person three who had a hotel room and an accomplice with him. But wait, here's the interesting thing. Person two and person three were organizers of the riot. The government knows who they are, but the government has not charged them. Why is that? You know why. They were almost certainly working for the FBI. So FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the capital on January 6 according to government documents. And those two are not alone. In all, Revolver News reported there are, quote, upwards of 20 unindicted co conspirators in the Oathkeeper indictments, all playing various roles in the conspiracy who have not been charged for virtually the exact same activities and in some cases much much more severe activities as those named alongside them in the indictments. So it turns out that this white supremacist insurrection was, again, by the government's own admission in these documents organized at least in part by government agents. Are you shocked? We're shocked. We shouldn't be shocked. Because in March, the FBI director admitted that the bureau was infiltrating as many dissident groups that oppose the regime as it possibly can. Speaker 1: There must be moments where you think if we would have known, if we could have infiltrated this group or found out what they were doing. And that do you do you have those moments? Speaker 2: So anytime there's an attack, especially one that's this horrific that strikes right at the heart of our system of government, right at the time the transfer of power is being discussed, you can be darn tooting that we are focused very very hard on how can we get better sources, better information, better analysis, so that we can make sure that something like what happened on January 6 never happens again. Speaker 0: But wait a second. There's a huge difference between using an informant to find out what a group you find threatening might do and paying people to help organize a violent action, which is what happened apparently according to government documents on January 6. That's a line, and the FBI has crossed it. And it's not the first time they crossed that line in Michigan. Remember that plot to kidnap governor Gretchen Whitmer? We heard a lot about that, and Whitmer was able to cover some of her own incompetence, though not all, by pointing to the fact that she's now a victim. Now in the FBI's telling of that plot, a whole team of insurrectionists was gonna drive a van up to Gretchen Whitmer's vacation house and throw her in the back and drive away. The mastermind of this plot, according to the FBI, was a man called Adam Fox. Who is Adam Fox? Adam Fox turned out to be a homeless guy who was living in the basement of a vacuum repair shop. Quite a gorilla. The whole story was a farce. It was insulting, really, once you got to the details, which outlets like the AP didn't bother with in the first read. But if you read the government's charging documents carefully and you should, you will see that it gets even more ridiculous. It turns out that one of the five people in the planned Gretchen Whitmer kidnap van was an FBI agent in the van. Another was an FBI informant. And the feds admitted in these documents that an informant or undercover agent was, quote, usually present in the group's meetings. In other words, using simple math, which we can do even on cable news, nearly half the gang of kidnappers were working for the FBI. Remember the guy who suggested using a bomb to blow up a bridge as part of that plot? That got a lot of coverage. That guy was an undercover FBI agent. Oh, okay. So if you're wondering why they're always comparing January 6 to 09/11, there's your answer. They're using the same tactics. And a lot of us missed this the first time around, and you are due an apology and we're proffering it on television right now. We didn't see the obvious. If you empower the government to violate civil liberties in pursuit of a foreign terror organization, and there are foreign terror organizations, it's just a matter of time before ambitious politicians use those same mechanisms to suppress political dissent, and that's what we're seeing now. We should have seen it earlier. Trevor Aronson wrote a book on this called the terror factory, and it analyzed every terror prosecution from 2001 to 02/2013. Aronson found that at least 50 defendants were on trial because of behavior that the FBI had not only encouraged but enabled. FBI agents were essentially the plotters in these crimes. They made the crimes crimes. In 02/2012, a writer for the nation called Petra Bartosiewicz found that FBI agents had, quote, crossed the line from merely observing potential criminal behavior, which by the way is allowed and good to and were quoting encouraging people and assisting people to participate in plots that are largely scripted by the FBI itself, end quote. And we checked. We looked carefully, and that's not an exaggeration. Wish it were. One of those plots was an Islamic terror attack in 2015 in Garland, Texas. It turns out that an FBI employee played an active role in that shooting. Speaker 3: The FBI was much closer to the Garland attack than anyone realized. After the trial, you discovered that the government knew a lot more about the Garland attack than they had let on. Speaker 4: That's right. Yeah. After the trial, we found out that they had had an undercover agent who had been texting with Simpson less than three weeks before the attack to him tear up Texas, which to me was an encouragement to Simpson. Speaker 3: The man he's talking about was a special agent of the FBI working undercover posing as an Islamic radical. Speaker 0: Man. So they're doing that to Islamic radicals. What are they doing to American citizens? That should really worry you. In a moment of uncharacteristic honesty, a former FBI assistant director called Frank Figaluzzi explained the other day on MSNBC, the goal is to round up people who dissent against the regime and throw them into solitary, and that's including members of congress. Watch this. Speaker 5: What have we learned from our experience with international terrorism? In order to address that problem, arresting low level operatives is merely a speed bump, not a roadblock. In order to really tackle terrorism, in this time domestically, you've got to attack and dismantle the the the command and control element of a terrorist group. That may mean people sitting in congress right now. Speaker 0: Roundup sitting members, duly democratically elected members of congress because they oppose the regime? Even Vladimir Putin's not doing that. And there's a former assistant director of the FBI calling for it on television, and no one noticed. So we're rounding people up. How about rounding up the FBI operatives that rioted on January 6? One had identified the guy who shot Ashley Babbitt to death. This is crazy, and we should resist it.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald

New Evidence of FBI's Involvement in the 1/6 Protest After the new NYT article on an FBI informant at the Capitol riot, I spoke with @DarrenJBeattie, who first revealed evidence of FBI's role, about what we now know, and about left/right realignments: https://rumble.com/vn50ax-new-evidence-of-fbi-involvement-in-the-16-protest-with-darren-beattie-who-b.html

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

WATCH: Footage of alleged J6 Fed Ray Epps, courtesy of @DarrenJBeattie’s Revolver News, shows him at the most critical moments leading up to and during January 6th. Full Episode: https://rumble.com/vocxr5-episode-13-who-is-ray-epps-feat.-dr.-darren-j.-beattie-firebrand-with-matt-.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes Ray Epps as "a man walking about a psychological paradox as the events of January 6 are unfolding because he seems to be singularly driven by this desire to get people to enter the capital, but then he is overwhelmingly concerned with no harm to officers or nothing that would, impair the operations of potentially other people that could have been acting at the behest of the federal government." "What were the tells that this didn't strike you as a genuine MAGA grandfather?" The piece hinges on "the video footage itself," with Revolver News' clip "Where's Waldo?" following Epps from January 5 into January, sixth. He argues there was "no plan by in the case of the Trump supporters to go in." He was at the barricade on January 6, and "the very first breach of the Capitol occurred literally two seconds after this same Ray Epps whispers into somebody's ear." Described as "professional"—"cool cucumber" and a "cold professional," proficient at crowd control. Red flags include "radical extreme suggestions" like "let's go into the capital," with a "weird emotional detachment" from the content of what someone is saying.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You described Epps as being a man walking about a psychological paradox as the events of January 6 are unfolding because he seems to be singularly driven by this desire to get people to enter the capital, but then he is overwhelmingly concerned with no harm to officers or nothing that would, impair the operations of potentially other people that could have been acting at the behest of the federal government. When you dug deeper into the video, what were the tells that this didn't strike you as a genuine MAGA grandfather Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Who merely showed up to this, out of support for Donald Trump? Speaker 1: No. I mean, that's that's an excellent question. And I think what really kind of, sells this piece and sells this story, really, not just the piece, is the video footage itself. So I'd strongly encourage you to play some of the footage the audience can see. And the Revolver News piece, I think, it has the most comprehensive kind of database of all the footage. We have we one of our clips is called, like, a Where's Waldo? Where we follow Ray Epps throughout his journey to the capital starting January 5 and then going into January, sixth. But it you're absolutely right. It was not as though there was any kind of, plan by in the case of the Trump supporters to go in. We have footage of him on January 5. He's dealing with all of these disparate groups, and there's in there's fighting with BLM, and everyone has their own agendas. Some people are there for this reason and that reason. And he repeatedly goes to group after group saying, look. Focus on what we're here for. The capital is where our problems are. We need to go into the capital. And it would be one thing if this were just a one off crazy guy making an offhand suggestion that was the end of it. But the very same guy who was saying we need to go into the capital to the shock and consternation of these Trump supporters, like, what are you talking about? This was the same guy who was on who was at the barricade on January 6 as Trump was giving his speech. So before the crowd went there, and the very first breach of the Capitol occurred literally two seconds after this same Ray Epps whispers into somebody's ear. And as for his demeanor and disposition, I think this is a really good point that you also gestured toward, and that is this. If I could use one word to describe the conduct and demeanor of Ray Epps, it is professional. And I don't say that entirely derisively. I have to have some degree of admiration for just for how cool and collected and detached. And, you know, there are a lot of emotions on that day. A lot of people were riled up. A lot of people got caught up in the crowd psychology. Let their anger get the best of them, and then they did something stupid that they regretted. But Ray Epps, what's amazing about him is, like, there's zero emotion. This guy is a cold he's a cool cucumber and a cold professional, and he's knows what he's doing. And he's an excellent he's very proficient at crowd control. And so here you have this guy, Epps, just, like, calmly saying, go to the Capitol. Go to the Capitol. People just listen to him. It's it's actually quite amazing. But that's one of the many kind of red flags that is in the the Revolver News piece. We have, you know, a number of red flags that typically identify a provocateur, and one of them is just, kind of a combination of kind of radical extreme suggestions, like, let's go into the capital, a combination of that with a kind of weird emotional detachment from the content of what someone is saying. And that is exhibited throughout, Epps' experience on January.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

.@DarrenJBeattie: “We were able to interpolate the exact day the FBI scrubbed Ray Epps from the Capitol Most Wanted List, and just by coincidence happened to be the very day after Revolver News ran an extensive piece on Stewart Rhodes." WATCH Episode 13: https://rumble.com/vocxr5-episode-13-who-is-ray-epps-feat.-dr.-darren-j.-beattie-firebrand-with-matt-.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
"the feds are entirely uninterested in this guy," "if anyone's a kind of major orchestrator in the first act of this so called breach of the capital, it would be him." "Epps' face was actually one of the first 20 faces that the FBI put on their January 6 most wanted list that anyone in DC would have seen, like, they had the posters everywhere." "Help us identify this man." "And then the Internet being what the Internet is, a remarkable vehicle, identified him within days and then crickets." "The feds weren't interested nothing about him until five months later, they scrubbed his face and name completely from their public database." "And the we were able to interpolate the exact day that they scrubbed it, and just by coincidence happened to be the very day after Revolver News ran an extensive piece on his, former, fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even though now it seems like the feds are entirely uninterested in this guy who, by all accounts, by all what it seems from looking at the video, it's apparent that if anyone's a kind of major orchestrator in the first act of this so called breach of the capital, it would be him. And it's curious that the feds don't seem to be interested, but what's even more curious is that initially they were. And Epps' face was actually one of the first 20 faces that the FBI put on their January 6 most wanted list that anyone in DC would have seen, like, they had the posters everywhere. They're very interested, and they did their usual stick where they say, we are calling on the public's help. Help us identify this man. And then the Internet being what the Internet is, a remarkable vehicle, identified him within days and then crickets. The feds weren't interested nothing about him until five months later, they scrubbed his face and name completely from their public database. And the we were able to interpolate the exact day that they scrubbed it, and just by coincidence happened to be the very day after Revolver News ran an extensive piece on his, former, fellow oath keeper, Stuart Rhodes.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Tucker Carlson & @DarrenJBeattie Discuss The Recent NYT Piece Vindicating Tucker Carlson & Revolver News' Reporting On The Presence Of FBI Informants On January 6th Tucker: "So we called this, and we called it because https://www.revolver.news/ originally broke it."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The New York Times published a report vindicating what we said months ago: FBI operatives were deeply involved in the events of January 6, the white supremacist QAnon insurrection. Citing, "confidential records," the newspaper reported that "the records suggest that federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into the assault on the capital even as it was taking place than was previously known," and that an FBI handler was texting a member of the so called Proud Boys, they're America's greatest threat, at the Capitol Complex. Darren Beatty of Revolver. News says the extent is far more than the feds and the media were willing to admit. The NYT piece acknowledges two informants, and if the NYT is covering this, it's because the situation is far worse and there'll be many more informants coming to light. This creates a strategic dilemma for the feds and regime media: if informants existed, why didn't you stop it? The shift away from foreplanning undermines the conspiracy narrative behind one six and its prosecutions and commission. Either way, they're lying, and the effect is to strip law abiding patriotic Americans of their civil liberties. Darren Beatty of Revolver. News, which got this story right months before anybody else.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, speaking of the FBI, the New York Times had just published a report vindicating what we said months ago. FBI operatives were deeply involved in the events of January 6, the white supremacist QAnon insurrection. Remember? Citing, quote, confidential records, the newspaper reported that, quote, the records suggest that federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into the assault on the capital even as it was taking place than was previously known. The paper reported that an FBI handler was texting a member of the so called Proud Boys, they're America's greatest threat, at the Capitol Complex. So we called this, and we called it because Revolver. News originally broke it. Darren Beatty runs revolver.news. He broke the story. He joins us now. Darren, thanks so much for coming on. So before we get to the question of why the New York Times is finally verifying what you reported months ago, and I think they denounced you as a conspiracy theorist for doing so. Tell us what you think, since you have credibility on this, what the scope of the federal involvement in January 6 was? Speaker 1: Well, it's a very good question. And the extent is far more than the feds and the media were willing to admit. The New York Times piece that you mentioned acknowledges two informants. And look, The New York Times is not out to do revolver. News any favors or to do you any favors. If The New York Times is covering this, it's because the situation is far worse and there'll be many more informants coming to light in the near future. And I think it's very important to point out that this poses a pretty severe strategic dilemma for the feds and their apparatchiks in the regime media, because you'll recall that Senator Klobuchar, when she posed the question about informants to FBI Director Wray, she did him the courtesy of assuming that there was no visibility into the protest because they had no informants. You see, if they had informants, that would have meant they were informed as to what would transpire. And then the question is, why didn't you do anything to stop it? Now that we know they have informed us, the question re presents itself. Why didn't they do anything to stop it? And I think this explains an interesting amount of sort of mixed messaging that we're seeing recently from the regime media coverage of this. You'll see that the basically, the feds are using their sources in the media to present this new narrative that, you know what? Actually, there wasn't foreplanning. Actually, it wasn't this conspiracy in advance. It was more of a spontaneous outburst. The reason you're seeing this transition in the narrative is that if there was no foreplanning on the part of the so called insurrectionists, that means there could have been no foreknowledge on the part of the feds, and they're absolved from suspicion as to why if they knew about it, they didn't do anything to stop it. But the real beauty part about this is that even as this narrative shift protects the downside for the feds from that type of exposure, it completely blows up another foundational pillar of the official narrative one six, which is that it was a conspiracy, which it was this preplanned attack that was set up in advance, and that's why it's like nine eleven. It's the basis of the prosecution of all of the militia groups essentially associated with one six. And furthermore, it's the basis of the entire one six commission. So they're really stuck in a bind. Either the FBI has to address new questions of why if they had a bunch of informants and they were presumably informed, they didn't stop it, or why this whole narrative that they've been telling us about a conspiracy that was preplanned that serves as the basis of multiple high level prosecutions and the commission itself, why that was false. It's either one or the other. Speaker 0: That's right. And either way, are lying, and the effect is to strip law abiding patriotic Americans of their civil liberties, and that is happening. And I appreciate your coming on. Darren Beatty of Revolver. News, which got this story right months before anybody else. Thank Speaker 1: you. Thank you.
Revolver News revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Tucker Carlson & @julie_kelly2 Discuss The Buzzfeed Report About The FBI's Involvement In The Governor Whitmer Plot & The Striking Similarities It Has To January 6th Tucker: "So what does this suggest about January 6th, before you dismiss it as a 'conspiracy theory?'"

Video Transcript AI Summary
BuzzFeed has just confirmed that the FBI had a, quote, “hand in nearly every aspect of the alleged plot, starting with its inception. In other words, the FBI helped plan it.” An FBI informant organized meetings to kidnap the governor. Another informant, quote, prodded the alleged mastermind of the kidnapping plot to advance his plan. And text from an FBI agent directed an informant to draw people into the conspiracy. In the end, it looks like there were more FBI snitches, informants, people working with the FBI involved in the plot than weren't. It was an FBI plot. So what does this suggest about January 6? We know there were FBI informants in the crowd. We know that for certain. Why can't we know their involvement in January 6 now that we're getting a sense of their involvement in this fake kidnapping plot? Julie Kelly of American Greatness discussed the Lansing April 2020 protest mirroring January 6, with militia groups in military gear, police stood down, firearms, and viral photographs. She cited the plausibility of FBI infiltration before January 6 and Revolver News Darren Beatty's article. The discussion called for leaders to question Christopher Wray.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, we're learning much more about the FBI's involvement in another alleged act of domestic terrorism that would be the plot last year to kidnap the governor of Michigan, Gretchen Whitmer. Now prominent Democrats at the time, very much including Whitmer herself, blamed Trump for this alleged plan. So what was the plan? Well, BuzzFeed, of all places, has just confirmed that the FBI had a, quote, hand in nearly every aspect of the alleged plot, starting with its inception. In other words, the FBI helped plan it. One FBI informant organized meetings to kidnap the governor. Another informant, quote, prodded the alleged mastermind of the kidnapping plot to advance his plan. And text from an FBI agent directed an informant to draw people into the conspiracy. In the end, it looks like there were more FBI snitches, informants, people working with the FBI involved in the plot than weren't. It was an FBI plot. So what does this suggest about January 6? Before you dismiss it as a conspiracy theory, we know there were FBI informants in the crowd. We know that for certain. We'll have a lot more on that tomorrow night. Why can't we know their involvement in January 6 now that we're getting a sense of their involvement in this fake kidnapping plot? Julie Kelly is with American Greatness. As we said many times, she's one of the few reporters on this story. She joins us tonight. Julie, thanks so much for coming on. What do you make of this Michigan kidnapping plot? Speaker 1: Well, what was interesting in the BuzzFeed article aside from how they put the kidnapping plot together was a protest at the Capitol Building in Lansing, Michigan, in April 2020, which eerily mirrors what happened on January 6. This includes these militia groups, one of them, the three percenters, who also has been accused of participating in January 6. They showed up in military gear. The police stood down, let them into the building. Even with full military garb, they had firearms. Photographers were there to take pictures. They were banging down doors looking for Gretchen Whitmer, and, all of those photographs and everything went viral. Sounds really familiar about what happened on January 6. So there's no reason now for anyone to doubt or be skeptical that this FBI that we know is so highly partisan, has now gone after Donald Trump, his associates, and now his supporters for the past five years that the FBI did not play an instrumental role in infiltrating many of these groups before January 6 and instigating things on that day. Speaker 0: We certainly have a right to know, and I would love to know why we don't have a right to know. And more to the point, I'd like to know why we don't know. And I it seems like one of the reasons is Republicans, starting with Mitch McConnell in the Senate, reflexively cover for the FBI and the Department of Justice. Why do they do that, do you think? Speaker 1: I don't know. I I wish that I had a good answer because I don't. And I I don't even know that any Republicans have spoken out since this news broke that the FBI was so instrumental. Now, also, this was exposed in October 2020. Again, we have the justice department and the FBI interfering in the election. Joe Biden condemned Donald Trump for not speaking out more about the kidnapping plot. This happened, obviously, in a crucial state just weeks before the election as people were voting. And this was supposed to reflect Donald Trump's support, right, the white supremacists. And so there's no reason not to believe that a few months later, we didn't just have an extension of what was happening throughout 2020, and then really bringing that to a a fulsome, what happened on January 6. So we need more leaders asking questions directly to Christopher Wray about the FBI's involvement. I think we also have to give a shout out to Darren Beatty at Revolver News because he really outlined in an article several weeks ago about the likelihood of the FBI's involvement. Speaker 0: If I hear another elected Republican say there was inadequate security on January 6 because Democrats are against law enforcement, when, of course Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Democrats are completely for law enforcement if they control it and it protects them, I'm gonna scream because that's clearly not the answer. Julie Kelly, I appreciate your coming on tonight and your reporting. Thank you. Thanks.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

.@CortesSteve & @DarrenJBeattie Discuss Why The NYT Is Finally Confirming What Revolver News Has Said For Months About FBI Informants On 1/6 Darren: "The only reason they are coming out with this now is that the reality is much worse and they're getting out ahead of the story."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patriots, if you think you know the full story of January 6, think again, due to 'absolute dereliction of duty of the media in this country.' Darren Beatty of Revolver News says they reported in June that 'federal operatives... provided foreknowledge' and that there were 'federal informants participating in the rally and communicating that day with federal law enforcement.' The New York Times later noted that 'law enforcement had far greater visibility,' which Beatty calls 'a PR operation' to precede 'more damning revelations ahead,' predicting 'many, many informants scattered throughout the various militia groups imputed to one six.' He asks, 'if they had informants... why didn't they do anything to stop it?' He cites Michigan Whitmer, noting 'the head of the Detroit FBI field office' who ran that operation 'was promoted to lead the investigation into one six,' and mentions 'Stuart Rhodes' of the Oath Keepers, who 'has not been indicted' and that 'the feds took a single cell phone from him four months after One Six.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Patriots, if you think you know the full story of what happened on January 6, the day of the so called insurrection, think again. And one of the reasons that we do not, really none of us know the full story is because of the absolute dereliction of duty of the media in this country. I wouldn't go so far as to call it absolute media malfeasance. A complete lack of curiosity, a lack of any kind of responsible journalism to try to get to the bottom of what really happened on that day in America. Now, one exception to that rule is not because he's not from a legacy media platform is Darren Beatty of Revolver News, and he joins us right now. Derek, Darren, thank you so much for being with us. Now, you reported you and Revolver reported all the way back in June that there was there were federal operatives who provided foreknowledge to federal law enforcement in advance of January 6 that there was trouble planned for that day. And you said at that time that it was also very likely that there were in fact federal operatives, federal informants participating in the rally and communicating that very day with federal law enforcement. Well, the New York Times, three months later, has finally caught up to where Revolver News already was. Here's what the New York Times said. As scores of proud boys made their way chanting and shouting toward the capital on January 6, one member of the far right group was busy texting a real time account of the march. The recipient was his FBI handler. So first of all, Darren, I wanna congratulate you on doing that excellent work and being incredibly early. Way way, you know, legions ahead of where the New York Times is finally getting to now. But I wanna ask you too about what the Times is up to, with this acknowledgement. One of the things they said in their article, New York Times, is that law enforcement had far greater visibility. I would say that is quite an understatement, far greater visibility. If law enforcement in fact had foreknowledge, doesn't that mean that the FBI or others in federal law enforcement, they made a willful decision to not try to deter violence in advance, and to not try to quell violence once it was ongoing? Speaker 1: Yes. That's a great point, And that really gestures toward what's really at stake here. And it all goes all the way back to a question senator Amy Klobuchar posed to FBI director Ray. She assumed that there was no informants. And she said, don't you just kick yourself that you had no informants? And of course, that's what they used to absolve themselves is the question of, if you knew anything advanced, why didn't you do anything? They said, we didn't know anything advanced because we didn't have any informants. It was an intelligence failure. Well, now we know that to be false. It wasn't an intelligence failure in that sense. They had informants. And look, The New York Times is not looking to do revolver.news, my news organization, any favors by vindicating our original reporting. The only reason they're coming out with this now is that the reality is much worse, and they're getting out ahead of the story. And I expect in the very near future, revelations that there are, in fact, many, many informants scattered throughout the various militia groups imputed to one six. So again, we have to repose the question forcefully to FBI director Ray and really everyone across the government. If they had informants and they were presumably informed by these informants as to what would happen, why didn't they do anything to stop it? Why did they let it happen on purpose? Speaker 0: Right. No. I think that's such an important point, and it certainly looks to me look. I'm somebody in the messaging business. It certainly looks to me as if this New York Times report, you're right, is a PR operation from the FBI or other federal law enforcement to try to get in front of what are sure to be more damning revelations ahead. Let me ask you this. The FBI has engaged in these kinds of tactics, unfortunately, for years where it literally stirs up and in some cases actually plans and instigates crime and then takes the credit for solving the very crimes that it planned. It sure seems like the FBI did that in Michigan regarding Right. The attempted kidnapping of governor Whitmer there. Do you believe that perhaps what happened in Michigan, where 12 FBI informants were involved in that operation, do you believe that that was a dress rehearsal for what they tried to pull off on January 6? Speaker 1: I do believe that. And in fact, a very, suspicious connection is the fact that the head of the Detroit FBI field office who ran the infiltration operation in Michigan, which involved the storming of the state Michigan capital, that guy, the day after the so called plotters were arrested, he was promoted by FBI director Ray to lead the investigation into one six. And this, if I can quickly insert a very important point here, is that it's bad enough for the feds to have, on the basis of informants known something was gonna happen and let it happen. That's a scandal unto itself. Is a thousand times worse if it turns out that the informants were actually some of the key instigators. And another, thread of revolvers reporting in fact, your listeners can go to revolver.news now and read about this. There's one key figure, the founder and head of the Oath Keepers, which is the main militia group imputed to the worst so called insurrection y aspects of '1 six. Eight months later, he has not been indicted. And as far as we know, the only extent of what he's been searched is the feds took a single cell phone from him four months after Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: One six, which doesn't make any sense when they're, you Speaker 0: know That's Stuart Rhodes you're talking about Speaker 1: right now, man. Yeah. Speaker 0: Darren, that's Stuart Rhodes. Yeah. Listen. Unfortunately, we gotta Running short on time here, but you're right. There's a lot more questions than answers about January 6 in general and about Stuart Rhodes in particular. And I know you and Revolver are gonna stay on it. You're a patriot. Please continue with this important work. Appreciate you joining Speaker 1: us Thanks so much. Thanks so much, Steve. You bet.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

All three parts available for free at http://TuckerCarlson.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
The election was totally fraudulent as we all knew. 100% it was stolen. January 6 was just, you know, mom and dad who were mad about what they saw to be an election that they thought was unfair. During 02/2020, rioters caused about $3,000,000,000 worth of damage and killed about two dozen people over the course of eight months. This is David Dorn in his very last moments on Earth. He's a former police captain protecting a store. I happen to believe that a lot of the ways they treated rioters that were left wing. Kamala Harris was working to help the instigators, the criminals, get out of jail. Giving the narrative that there's no consequences for acts of violence even on federal grounds, cases being dropped from the federal siege in Portland by leftist rioters. I believe that was part of setting a narrative to gaslight the right wing into thinking that they could riot too and get away with it. This is mostly a protest. It is not, generally speaking, unruly. Show me where it says that protest was supposed to be polite and peaceful. Peaceful protest. Peaceful protesters. Too many see the protest as the problem. No. The problem is what forced your fellow citizens to take to the streets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The election was totally fraudulent as we all knew. 100% it was stolen. And these congressmen and senators are gonna see we mean business. January 6 was just, you know, mom and dad who were mad about what they saw to be an election that they thought was unfair. During 02/2020, rioters caused about $3,000,000,000 worth of damage and killed about two dozen people over the course of eight months. Speaker 1: This is David Dorn in his very last moments on Earth. He's a former police captain protecting a store. Speaker 0: I happen to believe that a lot of the ways they treated rioters that were left wing. Kamala Harris was working to help the instigators, the criminals, get out of jail. Giving the narrative that there's no consequences for acts of violence even on federal grounds, cases being dropped from the federal siege in Portland by leftist rioters. I believe that was part of setting a narrative to gaslight the right wing into thinking that they could riot too and get away with it. This is mostly a protest. It is not, generally speaking, unruly. I just don't even know why there aren't uprisings. Speaker 1: Show me where it says that protest was supposed to be polite and peaceful. Speaker 0: Peaceful protest. Peaceful protesters. Peaceful protest. Peaceful Peaceful protest. Protest. Peaceful protest. Peaceful protest. Peaceful protest. Peaceful protest. Peaceful protest. Peaceful Peaceful Peaceful Speaker 1: Peaceful protest. Peaceful Peaceful protestors. Too many see the protest as the problem. No. The problem is what forced your fellow citizens to take to the streets.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

November 1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The domestic war on terror is here. It's coming after half of the country. The helicopters have left Afghanistan, and now they've landed here at home. And the left is hunting the right, sticking them in Guantanamo Bay for American citizens, leaving them there to rot. We are dealing with an insurgency in The United States. Terrorism for white supremacy is the most lethal threat to homeland. I've been told that I'm a white nationalist. Me. FBI, come on. They've begun to fight a new enemy in a new war in terror. Not Al Qaeda, but white supremacy. False flags have happened in this country. One of which may have been January 6.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The domestic war on terror is here. It's coming after half of the country. The helicopters have left Afghanistan, and now they've landed here at home. And the left is hunting the right, sticking them in Guantanamo Bay for American citizens, leaving them there to rot. We are dealing with an insurgency in The United States. Terrorism for white supremacy is the most lethal threat to homeland. I've been told that I'm a white nationalist. Me. FBI, come on. They've begun to fight a new enemy in a new war in terror. Not Al Qaeda, but white supremacy. Speaker 1: False flags have happened in this country. One of which may have been January 6.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

Who is Ray Epps? According to reports by Revolver News, why did the DOJ and FBI remove Epps and others from the J6 Most Wanted List? WATCH Episode 13 with @DarrenJBeattie: https://rumble.com/vocxr5-episode-13-who-is-ray-epps-feat.-dr.-darren-j.-beattie-firebrand-with-matt-.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long? Speaker 1: Well, we know we've asked that question of the attorney general, and we did not get a straight answer. Thomas Massey really ripened this issue by playing those videos and asking the attorney general, well, if this is the most sweeping investigation in all of America, If the greatest, most important thing in the world is to round up anyone who is moving people into the capital on January 6, why not Ray Epps? And now what we know, Stephanie, is that we believe Ray Epps, as a result of reporting in revolver.news, was actually on one of the federal wanted lists and then was taken off that list, not as a consequence of being arrested. He's actually in Arizona right now, but as a consequence of perhaps cooperation with the federal government. And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital. We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6. Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The firebrand @mattgaetz poses a question that AG Garland shouldn't be able to weasel out of so easily Thanks to @mtgreenee @RepThomasMassie and @RepGosar, among several others, for joining Let's make them squirm America deserves the truth about 1/6 https://www.revolver.news/2021/11/firebrand-congressman-matt-gaetz-demands-answers-from-merrick-garland-in-wake-of-revolvers-bombshell-1-6-reporting/

Firebrand Congressman Matt Gaetz Demands Answers from Merrick Garland In Wake of Revolver's Bombshell 1/6 Reporting - Revolver News Revolver Exclusive: Matt Gaetz and eight other Republicans send letter demanding Merrick Garland spill the beans on federal informants on 1/6. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@mtgreenee - Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸

I’m proud to stand with @mattgaetz and my colleagues to demand answers from @AttyGenGarland. The American people deserve to know if federal agents or informants incited the events of January 6th. https://www.revolver.news/2021/11/firebrand-congressman-matt-gaetz-demands-answers-from-merrick-garland-in-wake-of-revolvers-bombshell-1-6-reporting/

Firebrand Congressman Matt Gaetz Demands Answers from Merrick Garland In Wake of Revolver's Bombshell 1/6 Reporting - Revolver News Revolver Exclusive: Matt Gaetz and eight other Republicans send letter demanding Merrick Garland spill the beans on federal informants on 1/6. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Revolver News chronicles the epic meltdown over Tuckers 1/6 documentary See if you can find the hidden gems https://www.revolver.news/2021/10/tucker-carlson-patriot-purge-meltdown-liz-cheney-adam-kinzinger/

Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger Incite Liberal Meltdown Over Tucker Carlson Doc Exposing Dark Truth Behind 1/6 - Revolver News Erstwhile Regime toadies Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger just gleefully joined the liberal media crusade to deplatform Tucker Carlson. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

Were federal agents involved in the planning and execution of J6? Watch my interview with @DarrenJBeattie as we break down http://Revolver.news reporting on what exactly happened before, on, and after January 6th. FULL INTERVIEW HERE: https://rumble.com/vq2dd9-rep.-mtg-interviews-darren-j.-beattie-of-revolver-news.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two things are highlighted: a serious look at charging documents for militia groups, and the Michigan infiltration episode, described as the 'kidnapping plot' and a 'plot to storm the Michigan state capitol'—seen as a dry run for a later action by the same groups. It says no one else mentioned this Michigan event in understanding what may have happened on January 6 until Revolver News, and that this was the thrust of the initial report that opened up the entire Pandora's box. The other speaker adds that this was not covered by the press, calling it potential clickbait about 'a conspiracy plot by our federal government to be involved in a kidnapping operation of a governor,' noting that 'the head of that operation is now in that position here in Washington, D. C. overseeing this January 6 investigation.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So those two things combined, a serious look at the charging documents for the militia groups combined with what just happened involving the same militia group that was infiltrated to an astonishing degree, and which, by the way, people call the kidnapping plot, but it also involved a so called plot to storm the Michigan state capital. People forget. So it seems very much like a dry run for something that would happen just a couple months later involving the same people, the same militia groups, and so forth. And nobody until Revolver News talked about it mentioned this Michigan, event in the context of understanding what may have really happened on January 6. So that's really the thrust of our initial report, the thing that sort of opened up the entire Pandora's box and Speaker 1: Right. A lot of let me stop you there. Yeah. Now that is very interesting. That caught that just caught my attention completely when I when I learned that you were reporting about this because no one else was reporting about it, Darren. I mean, you didn't see it anywhere in in this great country of ours where we have freedom of the press And the press should be telling these stories, right? Because wouldn't that be great clickbait if we revealed this conspiracy plot by our federal government to be involved in a kidnapping operation of a governor in one of our states. I mean, you would think that would be all over the news, but it was And it was easy for it to ride fly under the radar. Like you said, it's incredible that the head of that operation is now in that position here in Washington, D. C. Overseeing this January 6 investigation.
Revolver News revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web Of Unindicted Operators At The Heart Of January 6 https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

#Thread On Part 2 Of The Revolver News Investigation Into Ray Epps & January 6th Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web Of Unindicted Operators At The Heart Of January 6 https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? No. Peacefully. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Base fed posting? We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay. Condiment Hill. Is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Please spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. Can we go up there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? We go up there? Yeah. We don't need to get chucked. Can we arrest us all? Let's go.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? No. Peacefully. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Base fed posting? We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay. Condiment Hill. Is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Please spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Speaker 1: Yeah. Can we go up there? Speaker 0: No? When we go in Speaker 1: Are we gonna get arrested? Speaker 0: We go Speaker 1: up there? Speaker 0: Yeah. We don't need to get chucked. Speaker 1: Can we arrest us all? Speaker 0: Let's go.
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

Turn your gaze away from the weapons of mass distraction and read this article by @DarrenJBeattie. Don’t let this get memory-holed by the DOJ, the FBI, the main stream media, and social media censors working on their behalf. https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

"Wow, much being learned about the January 6th protest. Remember, the insurrection took place on November 3rd!" - President Donald J. Trump https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

https://t.co/ak6KFVEDjq

@tippingpointoan - Tipping Point with Kara McKinney

MEET RAY EPPS, PART 2@DarrenJBeattiehttps://rumble.com/vrlxcq-tipping-point-darren-beattie-meet-ray-epps-part-2.html

ColumbiaBugle
Posted - December 18, 2021 at 8:49 PM
Saved - November 14, 2023 at 2:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a comprehensive investigation into the events of January 6th, new details have emerged about Ray Epps and a network of unindicted operators. The first breach at the Capitol was strategically located, allowing easy access for Trump supporters. A mystery man, known as ScaffoldCommander, played a significant role in directing the crowd to "move forward" and "fill up the Capitol." Ray Epps and ScaffoldCommander appeared to work together throughout the afternoon. Despite their involvement, neither has been prosecuted or pursued by the FBI. Additionally, there are unanswered questions surrounding the presence of BlackSkiMask and the "Hippies for Trump" bus. The article calls for further investigation into these individuals and their connections to the federal government. It concludes with a plea for Ray Epps to come forward and reveal the truth about what happened on January 6th.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

#Thread On Part 2 Of The Revolver News Investigation Into Ray Epps & January 6th Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web Of Unindicted Operators At The Heart Of January 6 https://revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. I don't even want to say it out loud because I could get arrested. But we need to go. Shut up, Uber. No, bad idea. Okay, fine. Let's go. But wait, will we get arrested? Will we get shot? Do we all need to be arrested?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. The capital. Into the capital. What? No. No. Tomorrow, I don't even like I'll say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, Uber. To the capital. Face No. No. No. Bad posting? Yeah. We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming. Okay. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, can we go up there? No. When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? Are we gonna get arrested? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Timeline Of FBI's Handling Of Ray Epps Story https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Ray Epps Moments Before The First Breach "The 'Big Bang' moment that kicked off the riot was when a small 'breach team' of just a few dozen people violently knocked over the first set of metal barricades between 12:50-12:53 p.m." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if they can go out and expresses concern about getting arrested or shot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yes. So can we go out there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested when we go out there? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Location Of The First Breach "The tactical importance of this breached location is that it was the very first walkway entrance into the Capitol grounds that every Trump supporter would arrive at first as they walked from the Trump rally to the Capitol." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"The Ray Epps Breach Team had the amazing foresight to pry open the one walkway entrance that no one could avoid." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Without police present or 'do not enter' signs prominently visible, people leaving Trump’s speech and arriving at the Capitol entrance would have no idea it was illegal to walk through the gate, or onto the lawn, or up to the Capitol steps." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"As we described in more detail in our October 10 report, the Ray Epps Breach Team thus set up what may amount to the largest legal booby-trap in American history." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Mystery Man Cutting Down And Then Rolling Up “Restricted Area” Fencing Around The Capitol lawn https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Mystery Man "This man remains unindicted. In fact, the FBI does not even appear to even be looking for him." "FenceCutterBulwark was waiting right next to the Ray Epps Breach Site at 12:31 p.m. That’s a full 20 minutes before the breach kicked off." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"If it were just FenceCutterBulwark hanging out near the breach site before the Proud Boys’ arrival, we might chalk it up to coincidence. But the presence of multiple key breach figures waiting here seems too much to be coincidental." Link To Video: https://rumble.com/vr06ax-ray-epps-continuous-shot-before-proud-boys-arrival-handbrake.html

Ray Epps - Continuous Shot Before Proud Boys' Arrival (Handbrake) Archive rumble.com

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Another Mystery Man Present During First Breach On January 6th

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

This Mystery Man On Top Of The “Media Tower” That Overlooked The Capitol’s Back Terrace On January 6 https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Mystery Scaffold Man Barking Orders To The Crowd On January 6th "For nearly 90 minutes straight, he bombards the otherwise leaderless crowd below him with endless variations on a single instruction: 'Don’t just stand there. Keep moving forward!'" https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Mystery Scaffold Man Urging People To "Fill Up the Capitol" https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Rallygoers could hear his confident and constant commands with total clarity all the way back at the entrance to the Capitol lawn." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"One attendee described this unnatural pressure in a vividly detailed Twitter thread (https://t.co/OKARvs2jH3) a few days after January 6. She fingered ScaffoldCommander as 'the ringleader' (https://t.co/G6t09EVZXr) of the operation." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@Twinity5 - Zudotoji

4) Then the ringleader on the tower with a megaphone shouted at the crowd to "MOVE FORWARD" and "Get to the frontline dammit!" like we are at war.

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Another attendee who was later arrested said he was just following the instructions of the man with the bullhorn yelling 'Patriots move forward.' That would be ScaffoldCommander." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@MacFarlaneNews - Scott MacFarlane

ARRAIGNMENT set for June 14 for Capitol breach defendant Stacy Hager of Texas Hager is accused of scaling wall & carrying Texas flag on the grounds Jan 6. Per feds, Hager said he felt invincible" & was following instruction of person w/bullhorn yelling "Patriots move forward"

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"But the FBI affidavit refuses to mention the tower commander with a giant bullhorn shouting at tens of thousands of people to 'Fill up the Capitol' for 90 minutes straight because, according to the FBI, he doesn’t exist." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Another Mystery Man (Also Unindicted) Reads A Prepared, Hand-Printed Speech Out Loud To The Crowd Mystery Scaffold Man Then Interrupts Him And Says:“Tell them to move forward! That’s all they need to know right now! Tell ’em to move forward!”https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
They aim to harm us for disagreeing with them. Our justice system no longer prioritizes truth, but winning at all costs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They seek to ruin our lives for disagreeing with them. Indeed, as has happened with our justice system, no longer do they seek the truth, but only to win by any means
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Ray Epps Giving People Very Similar Instructions As Mystery Scaffold Man On January 5th Ray Epps: "Our Enemy is the Capitol!" Link: https://rumble.com/vql5tg-ray-epps-keep-the-focus.html

Ray Epps - Keep The Focus Archive rumble.com

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Whether wittingly or unwittingly, Epps and ScaffoldCommander formed a two-man team the entire afternoon." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Ray Epps Located Right Next to The Tower Where The Mystery Scaffold Man Is https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gas is present, causing some discomfort. The promotion is happening with patriotic individuals. They are seen moving towards the national mall and Washington Monument, using towers intended for the inauguration. The American people are exhausted and feel deceived. We will determine if their grievances are valid. It is satisfying to be on the correct side of history.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gas here right now, so we're choking up a little bit. But that wasn't enough. The promotion being here with all these patriots, the real story, you can see them coming through the direction of the national mon of national mall, the Washington Monument full of people coming down constitution, coming down Pennsylvania, scaling the towers that were meant for the inauguration. The The American people are tired, fed up. They feel they've been cheated, and we're gonna find out if they're right. Good to be on the right side of history. Fuck Yes.
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Epps variously coordinating with a man in an orange ski mask, looking and pointing up at the media tower, retaking his spot by the tower, getting maced by police, then bellowing 'Ahhh, I love it!' as he temporarily retreats from the officers’ gas attack." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Ray Epps Is Seen Speaking With Police And Then Turning To The Crowd And Saying: “Guys: Listen Up. Up to the steps and stay there. We’re gonna stay there for a while.” Mystery Scaffold Man Can Be Heard At The End Telling The Crowd To "Move Forward" https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"So we have ScaffoldCommander directing the body of the crowd from the tower above, and Ray Epps directing the vanguard front-liners at the police line below. Yet neither one of them has been prosecuted, nor is either presently 'Wanted' by the FBI." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Mystery Scaffold Man Yelling At Police Before The First Breach https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're on our way. We noticed you pacing. Are you considering something?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's nothing you wanna get ahead of us. Yeah. I got I got We're coming. I see you pacing around. Are you thinking about it? We're coming. We see you pacing. Are you thinking about it?
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Mystery Scaffold Man Tearing Down Fencing And Signs Alerting People That The Area Is Closed https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"About 30 feet south of Ray Epps, right around the time the breach occurred at 12:50 p.m., a smaller squad of men were beginning the process of fence and barricade removal, out of sight of the walkway police." Crowd Tells Man In Black Ski Mask To Stop https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"This clean removal process will create the impression to the 15,000 people already walking from the Trump speech that no police barricades were ever there in the first place." Link To Video Mentioned: https://rumble.com/vpzgy1-blackskimask-barricade-removal-after-ray-epps-and-co-clear-the-path.html https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

BlackSkiMask - Barricade Removal After Ray Epps & Co Clear The Path Archive rumble.com
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"But there’s just one problem with this situation: the FBI knows exactly who BlackSkiMask is already. And for some reason, they’re still not prosecuting him." The "Hippies For Trump" Situation On 1/5 Link To Video Mentioned: https://rumble.com/vr02of-blackskimask-bus-interview-and-identification.html https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

BlackSkiMask - Bus Interview and Identification rumble.com
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Video Of Police Investigating "Hippies For Trump" Bus On 1/5 "A man from this bus is one of the very first 'insurrectionists' on the scene in the Capitol, and is removing barricades before the official story says the illegal activities started." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"And yet, today, the search engine results for BlackSkiMask’s terror scare are effectively nonexistent—you have to read local North Carolina papers to eek out scant details." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"How could there be a total media blackout on January 5 about a guns-and-explosives cache discovery in a bus parked in front of the US Justice Department, just one day before the major Trump rally and all-important Senate certification vote?" https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Be Civil Guy" -First guy who broke upfield toward the second police line, way past the “Restricted Area” fencing. -Pats down and tells man to stop breaking windows but assures him: “We’re getting in. We’re getting in.” Link To Video: https://rumble.com/vq7r7a-becivilguy-were-getting-in.html -Both Unindicted

BeCivilGuy - "We're Getting In" Archive rumble.com

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Ray Epps' Reaction To The Crowd On January 5th After They Booed Him, Called Him A "Fed" And Said "You’re Not Gonna Do Sh*t" When He Advocated Going Into The Capitol https://rumble.com/vqmv1x-ray-epps-reaction-to-being-told-youre-not-gonna-storm-the-capitol.html

Ray Epps - Reaction To Being Told "You're Not Gonna Storm The Capitol" Archive rumble.com

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Ray Epps Recruiting People To Go To The Capitol On January 6th "It's that direction. Please spread the word!" https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express their excitement about the large crowd gathered at the Washington Monument Hill. They mention their intention to head towards the Capitol after President Trump's speech, as they believe that is where the real politics happen. They emphasize the direction towards the Capitol and encourage others to spread the word.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. It's full all the way to the Washington Monument Hill. Speaker 1: We are going to the capitol where our problems are. It's that direction. As soon as president Trump is finished speaking, we are going to the capital in that direction. That's where our true politics lies. President Trump is done As soon as president Trump's come speaking, we are going to the capital. The capital is in that direction. Let people know. Spread the
Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Interesting Interview Ray Epps Did With AZ Central (https://archive.fo/CuMA4) https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Forbes: FBI And Other Agencies Paid Informants $548 Million In Recent Years With Many Committing Authorized Crimes https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/11/18/fbi-and-other-agencies-paid-informants-548-million-in-recent-years-with-many-committing-authorized-crimes/?sh=1c102eb5f4dd

FBI And Other Agencies Paid Informants $548 Million In Recent Years With Many Committing Authorized Crimes The FBI spent an average of $42 million a year on confidential human sources between fiscal years 2012 and 2018. forbes.com

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"The sham January 6 House Select Committee has now subpoenaed over 100 civilian cell phone records. But you know the fix is in because they have stayed away from subpoenaing the cell phone records of Ray Epps." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Congressional Republications must now demand the phone records and full and complete account of Ray Epps’s relationship with the federal government." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"January 6 defense lawyers: you must seek court-ordered subpoenas for discovery production related to the federal government’s records on such individuals as Ray Epps and ScaffoldCommander." https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

"Finally, Ray Epps, if you’re reading this: We know that you are conflicted, and that you want to the truth to come out. You can still be a hero. Simply come forward, and tell the world your story. What really happened on January 6?" https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@ColumbiaBugle - The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸

Bookmark https://revolver.news & https://amgreatness.com Follow @DarrenJBeattie & @julie_kelly2 Watch @TuckerCarlson's Documentary Series "Patriot Purge" End Of Thread

Revolver News revolver.news
American Greatness › Next Generation Conservatism American Greatness is the leading voice of the next generation of American Conservatism. amgreatness.com
DarrenJBeattie
Posted - July 14, 2022 at 1:42 AM
Saved - January 9, 2024 at 12:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The New York Times' puff piece on Ray Epps, the only January 6 rioter they've written positively about, is significant. Epps is seen directing people into the Capitol in multiple videos. The article mentions a text message where Epps claims to have orchestrated movements of people to the Capitol after Trump's speech. The piece fails to address Epps' association with intelligence agencies or ask important questions about his motives. Epps' participation in the riot is more serious than the Times suggests, and he is featured as a pre-planner in their own video documentary. The Times is attempting a cover-up, but the truth about Epps must come out.

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

THREAD 1/x The New York Times puff piece on Ray Epps is hugely important. Ray Epps, the only person caught on repeatedly directing people into the Capitol is the only January 6 rioter the New York Times has written a puff piece for https://archive.ph/TXyZT

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

2/x They know Epps is the smoking gun. And this likely is the beginning of a monumental damage control campaign

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

To get acquainted with Epps, watch the video compilation: again, this is the ONE Jan 6 rioter the New York Times has managed to write a puff piece for

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, we're planning to peacefully go into the capital to address our problems. We don't want to be arrested or harmed, so we should be cautious. However, one person asks if we'll all get arrested, to which another person replies affirmatively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Into the capital. What? Peaceful. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Tomorrow. I don't even like to say it because Don't be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, can we go out there? No. When When we go in Are we gonna get arrested this year? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Let's turn to the Times piece, and skip straight to the buried lede. Here we see reference to a text message Epps sent to his nephew describing how he "orchestrated movements of people" to the Capitol after Trump's speech

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Will this text soon become a matter of public record? What exactly is his phrasing? Will other Ray Epps communications soon come out that will further clarify this sudden need for aggressive damage control?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Also: The entire NYT piece contains no explicit denial by Epps of association with military intelligence, DHS, JTTF, or any cutouts or intermediaries. We have references to "lies" and Epps' wish that "the truth come out," in addition to denial of association with law enforcement

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

I wonder if @alanfeuer could clarify for the record: did he ask Epps if he had any association with any intelligence agencies or cutouts of such agencies? If so, what did he say? If not, why not?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Feuer's NYT piece describes Epps as a Trump supporter. He says "Trump traveled to Washington to back Mr. Trump"... and that he "took a last minute trip to Washington for Trump's speech about election fraud." The only problem is EPPS DIDNT GO TO TRUMPS SPEECH

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

That's right, this alleged Trump supporter travelled all the way from Arizona to DC, and didn't even attend Trump's speech. Instead, he spent the evening of January 5th and the morning of the 6th telling people to go into the Capitol (VIDEO)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, we need to go to the capital, but we can't say it out loud because we might get arrested. We should go there to address our problems, but it's a risky move. We're unsure if we'll get arrested or shot. Can they arrest all of us?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Into the capital. What? Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, Uber. To the capital. No. No. Face bedposting? Yeah. We didn't go into the capital. I didn't see that coming. Okay. No. No. No. This is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's bad direction. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? We gonna get arrested. We don't need to get shot. Can you arrest us all?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Did Alan Feuer, the obscure (bluecheck-less!) NYT reporter who penned the puff piece, think to ask Epps why he travelled all the way to DC and skipped Trump's speech?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

For that matter, did Feuer ask Epps where he got the idea to urge people to go into the Capitol in the first place? Did it occur to him out of the blue? Did someone else give him the idea? If so, who?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The whole purpose of Jan 6 Committee is to figure out what caused Jan 6. Epps was calling for people to go into the Capitol the evening before. Wouldn't it be newsworthy to know where Epps got the idea, and why he was so doggedly fixated that particular mission?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The very fact that these questions weren't asked indicates that this is one of the sloppiest and most transparent cover-up jobs in New York Times history--- a total Feuer job!

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The Times attempts to wave off Epps' January 6 participation as negligible, similar to those who committed minor offenses and weren't charged

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Yet Epps is the key person caught on video with an advance plan to go into the Capitol. He's there the morning of directing people to the Capitol, and he's right up at the barricade during the initial breach

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

after the breach Epps runs into the restricted zone. Note that many others, including Jeremy Brown, Owen Shroyer, Ibrahim, Cuoy Griffin, and others have been hit with tresspassing charges for this

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

But Epps isn't open to just a trespassing charge. Not enough has been said about the significance of the following video. Note Epps message "WHEN we go in, leave this here." Epps says this just minutes before the intiial breach of Capitol grounds

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is having a conversation with someone named Dave. They are discussing whether or not they should go out somewhere and if they will get arrested or shot if they do. They mention that there are about a dozen people involved. They also ask if they can go up somewhere, but it is unclear if they are allowed. The speaker reiterates that they don't want to get arrested or shot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So should we go out there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested if we go out there? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all? There's a few of us, like, a dozen or so. K. But one more thing Yes. Can we go up there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested for the call, Sam? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

How is this not a basis for a conspiracy charge? For some perspective, Jan 6 defendent George Tanios faces serious conspiracy charges for saying "no no not yet it's still early" when his alleged co-conspirator asked for bear spray

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Ray Epps' participation in the Jan 6 riot was sufficiently egregious as to make him one of the early targets of the Sedition Hunters, and earn him a spot as one of the first 20 of FBI's most wanted for January 6

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Amazingly, Ray-Epps is referenced as a pre-planner of the Capitol siege in the NYT's OWN VIDEO DOCUMENTARY of January 6, "Day of Rage: How Trump Supporters Took the US Capitol"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some individuals had planned to storm the Capitol, and tomorrow they intended to carry out their plan. Although I hesitate to mention it, as it could lead to my arrest, I will say it anyway. We must enter the Capitol. Let's go.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And how for some, storming the capital was part of the plan all along. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in to the capitol. Let's go.

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The very same NYT that now dismisses "conspiracies" about Ray Epps refers to Epps in its own definitive video documentary as a rioters for whom "storming the capitol was part of the plot all along"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some individuals had planned to storm the Capitol as part of their agenda. Although I hesitate to mention it, as it could lead to my arrest, we must take action. We need to enter the Capitol. Let's proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And how for some, storming the capital was part of the plan all along. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in to the capitol. Let's go.

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Again the NYT video documentary features Epps as one of the key orchestrators of the Capitol siege

Video Transcript AI Summary
The rally, initially planned as a political protest, saw some individuals advocating for storming the Capitol even before Trump addressed the crowd.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Although the rally is billed as a political protest, some make calls to storm the Capitol even before Trump speaks.

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The Times piece ominously suggests Epps will sue news outlets for defamation... should Epps sue the NYT for suggesting Epps pre-planned the Capitol attack in its own ostensibly definitive video documentary of that "day of rage?

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

The bottom line here is that Ray Epps is the smoking gun of the Fedsurrection narrative, and the New York times is kicking off a massive damage control campaign to make any unsanctioned ideas about Epps too toxic and dangerous to print

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Regime janitors like Feuer who specialize in mopping up Fed dirty work will go into overdrive as more about Ray Epps and the initial breach comes out We're on to their game - its too late Ray Epps says he just wants the truth to come out. Let it be so. https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@DarrenJBeattie - Darren J. Beattie 🌐

Be sure to pre-order the Skyhorse introduction to the sham Jan 6 committee report, featuring an introduction by yours truly https://www.amazon.com/January-6th-Report-Committee-Investigate-ebook/dp/B0B16YRGYC/ref=sr_1_1?crid=Y5RWZCTIE6GZ&keywords=january+6+committee+skyhorse&qid=1657766033&sprefix=january+6+committee+skyhorse%2Caps%2C76&sr=8-1

Sorry! Something went wrong! amazon.com
dom_lucre
Posted - February 5, 2023 at 10:06 PM
Saved - February 7, 2023 at 3:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ray Epps, a man who publicly incited violence during the January 6th Capitol riot, was added to the FBI's wanted list but later removed without being arrested or detained. The mainstream media's defense of Epps is unusual, and it's suspected that he may be protected by someone larger, possibly the Democrat-controlled DOJ. Epps' actions go beyond what an FBI agent or asset would be permitted to accomplish, and it's unclear why he was removed from the FBI's wanted list. Some speculate that he may have worked with the FBI, but the MSM's support of him and the Jan 6th committee's removal of him without charge adds more proof that he is being shielded by the Democrats.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

𝐓𝐇𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃: Proof that Ray Epps Was a Die-Hard Trump Supporter!

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Ray Epps' activities go beyond what an FBI agent or asset would be permitted to accomplish. Ray Epps was added to the FBI's WANTED list on January 8 and removed from it on June 30, 2021, after he was formally recognized by the New York Times.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I might go to jail for this, but tomorrow we need to peacefully go into the capital.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out there. I'm probably gonna go to jail for it. Okay? Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital, into the capital. Peacefully.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The MSM defense of Ray Epps is strange, in this piece ("Ray Epps has suffered greatly in the previous 10 months as right-wing media personalities and Republican lawmakers have baselessly labeled him..." — NYT, July 13, 2022) is particularly suspect. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/us/politics/jan-6-conspiracy-theory-ray-epps.html

A Trump Backer’s Downfall as the Target of a Jan. 6 Conspiracy Theory Ray Epps became the unwitting face of an attempt by pro-Trump forces to promote the baseless idea that the F.B.I. was behind the attack on the Capitol. nytimes.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The FBI infiltrates numerous organizations and sometimes provokes it's members. "Sting operations" are what they're called. The phony conspiracy to abduct Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer is an extreme example of this. We do know at least 20 Fed agents were there..

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Ray Epps was publicly inciting violence, the FBI's integration would likely be done without drawing attention on themselves. In the popular case of Whitey Bulger, an FBI informant, he was put on their WANTED list only after he was no longer an FBI informant and had vanished.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

So, why would the FBI remove Ray Epps from their wanted list and remove him from all investigations without arresting or detaining him? Ray Epps would have to be protected by someone larger if not the FBI itself, probably the Democrat-controlled DOJ.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The New York Times published a lengthy defense of Ray Epps, something they would never do for a Trump supporter or an FBI agent involved in the January 6 assault. He has not been charged with anything, not even trespassing, despite the fact that he clearly did.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The mainstream media's assumption that Ray Epps is simply another Trump supporter acting on his own will is difficult to accept. There is no proof that he was even a Republican, let alone a genuine Trump supporter. https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/ @RevolverNewsUSA did a phenomenal job!

Meet Ray Epps, Part 2: Damning New Details Emerge Exposing Massive Web of Unindicted Operators at the Heart of January 6 - Revolver News Revolver blows open a network of still-unindicted operators who appear to have been intimately involved in the initial Jan. 6 Capitol breach. revolver.news

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Among the hundreds of demonstrators on January 6, and the thousands of hours of publicly accessible film from that day, Epps may be the only individual nailed dead to rights for admitting on camera to orchestrating a pre-planned assault on the Capitol.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Agents from the FBI Field Office in Phoenix (where Epps resides) have gone so far as to deny that Ray Epps exists. Instead of going after Epps, FBI agents have gone after journalists who dared to question Epps in person whether he was a government spy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the Capitol incident on January 6th and focus on a person named Ray Epps. Speaker 1 claims that Epps caused damage and was initially on the FBI's list of top twenty people involved. However, Epps allegedly used his contacts within the organization to remove himself from the list. Speaker 1 saw Epps on January 5th near the BLM Plaza in Washington DC, where there was a protest. Speaker 1 urges the FBI to investigate Epps further. Speaker 0 expresses skepticism towards the media and Speaker 1 offers to call them instead of providing a phone number. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 requesting a way to contact Speaker 1.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We can sit down for a little bit? Speaker 1: No. I think standing here is good and I'm gonna record just because, like, Speaker 0: I feel safer that way and That's fine. Speaker 1: If you guys wanna record too, I encourage that. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So we're here about the capital incident that happened on January 6th. It's our understanding that you were there. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We're interested in finding out information that you may have about possible attacks on law enforcement, Destruction to the property? Speaker 1: To, like, Ray Epps. I'm sorry? You're asking about Ray Epps? Speaker 0: I don't know who Ray Epps is. Speaker 1: You guys should know who Ray Epps is. Okay. Speaker 2: Did you did Speaker 1: you He's he's been in the media. Speaker 2: Was he one of the people that was there? Speaker 1: He's, caused damage Speaker 2: or that assaulted a police officer? Speaker 1: There definitely should be an investigation into that. Okay. He was on the list initially when the FBI put out for, I think, like, top twenty people. He was on that. And he used his contacts within your organization to take himself off of the list. So it's surprising you guys don't know about that. Speaker 0: Well, I, he's not from Arizona, I would presume. Speaker 1: He actually is from Arizona. He works with your guys' Oath Keepers, militia group. Speaker 0: Well, the FBI doesn't have a militia group, but Speaker 2: And this EBSKA, he was there. Did you see him there? Speaker 1: Not on January 6th. I Saw him on January 5th. Okay? Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 0: And what was he doing on January 5th? Speaker 1: He was out next to the BLM Plaza. Do you guys know about that in Washington DC? The the mayor, she kinda had Black Lives Matter painted on the road next to the, like, the White House area. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Okay. Speaker 2: I don't Speaker 1: know if you guys are like DC people or not. No. Speaker 2: We're not. Speaker 1: We're actually I'm not I'm not either. So it's it's kinda hard describing it but there's like a big a big road she painted black lives matter Okay. Political statement. And that night, there was a protest there and that's where Ray Epps was at and tease her on and Tug Carlson played a clip as well of saying, we need to go into the capital tomorrow, and that's quoting Ray Epps. Speaker 2: 5th. This was on 5th. Speaker 1: Well, for January 6th, it's a very small group. You guys are noticing a lot of the same names. Speaker 2: Yeah. But Speaker 1: So it's like, Ray Ray apps, you guys should have known about. Speaker 2: We get we get leads just to to talk to certain to people that are in Northern Arizona. Speaker 0: Doesn't I mean, the FBI doesn't know about it. Speaker 1: It just keeps How did my how did my lead come up? I I hope you guys follow-up on this Ray Epps guy. I've been getting a lot of attention about it because I tried to talk to him and ask him some questions, and he'll probably be more adamant to answer you guys than me. I know you say you don't watch the media. Is there a reason for that? Speaker 0: Yeah because, I just don't believe a lot what I see on TV anymore. The news Me, when you experience Very instant. And you see what's on TV, it's like 2 different realities. Speaker 2: Yeah. It really is. Do you have a phone number for us? Speaker 1: No. I don't wanna give you it if Don't have Speaker 0: it already. Well, how am I gonna call you? Speaker 1: I'll call you. Speaker 0: Alright. If you're if there's some

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Despite the FBI's efforts to remove Epps' face from its "Wanted" database (as well as public denials of his existence by authorized agents), the FBI DC Field Office still lists Ray Epps as a "Wanted" man in this pinned Tweet. https://t.co/A16r0rEcb0

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

It all started when Ray Epps and his tiny "breach squad" pulled down the first set of barriers between 12:50 and 12:53 P.M. The same breach squad went on to demolish "Restricted Area" signs, and remove protective fencing from the Capitol grounds in a methodical manner.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if they can go out, but Dave says no. They are concerned about getting arrested or shot if they go out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go out there? No. When we go in Are we gonna get arrested when we go out there? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The breaching site was strategically important since it was the first pathway entry onto the Capitol grounds that every Trumper would come at first as they proceeded from the Trump event to the Capitol. The Epps Breach Team opened the one pathway entry that no one could avoid.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

People leaving Trump's speech who arrived at the Capitol door had no idea it was unlawful to go through the gate, onto the grass, or up to the Capitol steps if no police were there or "do not enter" signs were displayed. After all, it is normally open to the public. See below

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, Vince, is unable to join the speaker at a certain location and plans to stay on the sidewalk to find a good vantage point. The speaker greets someone and mentions that the grass is overgrown. They also mention waiting for their husband to finish playing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. I'm by the speaker, Vince. Where you at? There's no way I could get down there, So I'm gonna stay on the sidewalk somewhere and get me a good leverage point, on the same right hand side. See what I can do, man. The grass is wild. Hi. Hello. Go ahead. Oh, no. Go ahead. I'm waiting for my husband to play a second. Oh, excuse me, mate.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

As a result, the Epps Breach Team put up what might be the greatest legal trap in American history. The Justice Department said that anyone who walked in the red line below on J6 had committed a federal felony and may be held without bond until a criminal trial 12+ months away.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

One of his breachers can be seen tearing down and then rolling up the "limited area" fence that surrounds the Capitol grounds, dressed casually & wore dark shades on a foggy day. Not upset. He appeared detached, cool, and professional as if he were just there to perform his job.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

At 12:31 p.m., FenceCutterBulwark was waiting just next to the Ray Epps Breach Site. That was 20 minutes before the breach began. He was doing nothing except peering out beyond the barrier he would later remove. But it's not just Ray Epps and FenceCutterBulwark...

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Where are the press podiums with details of such a capture? All responding officers would be promoted and awarded medals. We're talking about breaking a story of tactical "Trump supporters" in broad daylight, right in front of the Justice Department. Why the radio silence?

Video Transcript AI Summary
After President Trump's speech, we will head to the capital where our problems lie. Spread the word and join us there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As soon as president Trump is finished speaking, we are going to the capital in that direction. That's where our truth problems lies. President Trump is just speaking. We are going to the capital. That's where our problems are. Hey, folks. We need your help. As soon as president Trump Stop speaking. We are going to the capital. The capital is in that direction. Let people know. Spread the word.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

It is plausible that Ray Epps worked with the FBI, but the MSM's unusual support of him, along with the Jan. 6 committee's removal of him without charge adds more proof that Ray Epps is being shielded by the Democrats, #FreeTheJ6Prisoners

digitalassetbuy
Posted - September 19, 2023 at 7:35 PM
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 12:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Digital Asset Buy shares a conversation where John Deaton asks Caitlin Long about a court document involving Steven Nerayoff. The document suggests that a three-letter agency confronted Nerayoff, demanding information on Long and others. Mascotto89 responds, stating that despite pressure, Nerayoff refused to provide information and was eventually prosecuted. The conversation ends with the question of why Nerayoff was the real target. #staytuned

@digitalassetbuy - Digital Asset Investor.XRP

Whoa! @JohnEDeaton1 asks @CaitlinLong_ about the @StevenNerayoff court document saying a certain three letter agency threw him in a van and put a list including her name in his face demanding dirt on them to try and get convictions.👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀 https://t.co/MjR6fCQHVu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is asked about a claim made by Steven Nayeroff, who said that when he was arrested, the FBI demanded information from him about various people, including the speaker. The speaker admits to not knowing anything about it until it came out publicly. They mention that there were many names on the list, but the press only focused on a few. The speaker reiterates that they had no knowledge of the situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There and I got DMs, asking me this. So I'm gonna I'm gonna throw this at you, and ask you, if you know anything or if you have a comment or you don't. But, Steven Nayeroff, has made a claim that when he got arrested, a he was thrown in a van and was demanded by the FBI to give up whatever information he had on a litany of people a problem, you know. And you were on that list and there were other people on the list, journalist on the list such as, Naomi Brockwell, a client of mine, you know, vital butylene in others and were you aware of that or do you know anything about it? Speaker 1: I was not. I did not know anything about it a Until all that came out and when I started looking into it, what I spotted was there were a lot of names on that list and the press picked and chose a few that a Might be the best known, but there were a lot of names on that list. I knew nothing Speaker 0: about it. Okay. And so you really don't know anything about it? Nope.

@mascotto89 - michael scotto

@digitalassetbuy @JohnEDeaton1 @CaitlinLong_ @StevenNerayoff @StevenNerayoff refused to provide info on anyone despite enormous pressure. Govt eventually dropped demand to give info on others. Even when we gave indisputable proof of his innocence they continued to prosecute him. So HE was the real target. Question is why? #staytuned

MJTruthUltra
Posted - September 26, 2023 at 10:41 PM
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 1:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6, a series of events unfolded at the Capitol that raised questions and revealed inconsistencies. Despite media narratives, former President Trump called for peace and urged protesters to go home. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 was in place in 2021, allowing objections to the Electoral Count. Contrary to initial reports, no police officers died that day, and some suicides occurred later. The Capitol Police Chief was silenced, and there were indications of a setup. Antifa's presence and FBI involvement were also revealed. Ray Epps, a person of interest, had a disturbing past. Entrapment and undercover identifiers further suggest a setup. The truth behind January 6 continues to emerge.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

🚨 MASTER THREAD 🧵 JANUARY 6 BOOKMARK THIS THREAD! I am releasing everything I have collected over the years into this one thread. This post will be updated a few posts at a time & all future information will be dropped into this post. Let’s begin…

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite the mockingbird media saying that Donald Trump “incited an insurrection”, this was his message on January 6… “I know your pain. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have Law & Order. We have to respect our great people in Law & Order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s been a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this, where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us. From me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have PEACE. So go HOME. We LOVE YOU. You’re very SPECIAL. You’ve seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel. But go HOME And go HOME in PEACE.” 🙏 This Video https://rumble.com/v34gqif-donald-trump-tells-january-6-protestors-to-go-home-in-peace.html You can watch Trumps full speech on January 6 here https://rumble.com/v34gpbn-january-6-trumps-speech-at-the-save-america-march-in-washington-dc.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your pain and hurt. The election was stolen from us, even though it was a landslide victory. We need to go home now and prioritize peace, law and order. We must respect our law enforcement and avoid anyone getting hurt. This is an unprecedented time where they could take away our democracy. Although this election was fraudulent, we can't play into their hands. We love you, you're special. We've witnessed the mistreatment of others, but it's important to go home peacefully.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened and where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
Donald Trump Tells January 6 Protestors to “Go Home in Peace” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Trumps Speech at the Save America March in Washington DC Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite what Mike Pence says or the Mockingbird Media tries to Amplify, Mike Pence did have the Constitutional Authority to Pause the Vote 2001 Al Gore<> 2021 Mike Pence The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2001 The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2021 In 2001, any congressman who wanted to raise an objection, the ECA of 1887 insists that he/she needs the signed support of one ONE Senator. In 2021, Congressman Paul Gosar, along with 60+ of his colleagues objected to the Electoral Count of Arizona. The objection was in writing & was signed by a senator. There were others. The (ECA) of 1887 was then REPLACED with the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 in a now successful attempt to change the VP’s role. Our elected/selected officials are guilty of treason. https://rumble.com/v35yusg-january-6-2001-2021-gore-pence-pence-could-have-sent-it-back.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the certification of the election results, Al Gore presided over the event as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate. If a congressman wanted to object, they needed the signed support of one senator. One congressman objected, stating that the Supreme Court, not the people, decided the election. However, the objection was not signed by a senator. Another congressman from Arizona then objected, with the objection being in writing and signed by a senator. The video ends with a statement that President Trump was wrong in claiming the right to overturn the election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the House of Representatives and the Senate was to certify the election results. Al Gore, in his dual role as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate, presided over the event that would officially anoint George W. Bush as the new President. If any congressman wanted to raise an objection, the rules insisted that he or she had to have the signed support of just 1 senator. Speaker 1: Mister president, it is in writing and signed by myself on behalf of many of the diverse constituents in our country, Especially those in the 9th congressional district and all American voters who recognize that the Supreme Court, not the people of the United States, decided this election. Speaker 2: Is the objection, signed by a senator? Speaker 1: Unfortunately, mister president, it is not signed by 1 single senator. Speaker 2: Are there any objections to counting the certificate of vote of the State of Arizona that the teller has verified appears to be regular, informed, and authentic? Speaker 3: Mister Vice President, I, Paul Gosar, from Arizona Speaker 2: What purpose does the gentleman from Arizona rise? Speaker 3: I rise both for myself and 60 of my colleagues to object To the, counting of the electoral ballots from Arizona. Speaker 2: Is the objection in writing and signed by a senator? Speaker 3: Yes, it is. Speaker 2: And I heard this week that president Trump said I had the right to overturned the election. President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election. The
January 6 - 2001 <> 2021 Gore <> Pence — Pence Could Have Sent it Back Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite what the Mockingbird Media says…. No Police Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Merrick Garland LIED! Officer Brian Sicknick was said to be killed by a violent mob, hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. That was a lie! Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick suffered 2 strokes and died the day after January 6th, the District’s chief medical examiner has ruled. The autopsy found no evidence of an allergic reaction to chemical irritants, external or internal injuries. Capitol Police officer Sicknick died of natural causes, 2 strokes due to a blood clot. The Four Other Officers oddly enough “committed suicide”, Some long after January 6. • Officer Kyle DeFreytag “Suicided” himself on July 10 • Officer Gunther Hashida “Suicided” himself at his home, found July 29. • Officer Howard Liebengood “suicided” himself on January 9 • Officer Jeffrey Smith “suicided” himself on January 15 https://www.fox5dc.com/news/fourth-police-officer-dies-by-suicide-after-capitol-riot-family-confirms This Video https://rumble.com/v2cb06e-january-6-merrick-garland-lied-no-officers-died-that-day.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer Brian Sicknick's cause of death remains uncertain, despite media claims that he was beaten to death by Trump supporters during the Capitol riot. Video evidence shows Sicknick walking through the building unharmed. However, the media and politicians like Liz Cheney continue to spread false information without correction or apology. The White House, including Press Secretary and Attorney General Merrick Garland, falsely claim that Sicknick and other officers were murdered during the riot. In reality, the other four officers mentioned died by suicide, with no evidence linking their deaths to the Republican mob. While some officers were assaulted, the claim that January 6th was the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War is unfounded.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Consider the death of police officer Brian Sicknick. Now we still don't know exactly how officer Sicknick died. We're not certain that anyone does know. No one has explained it. But after reviewing the previously withheld video evidence, we can tell you with certainty that officer Cyknick was not beaten to death by Trump voters at the capitol. The tape shows very clearly Brian Sicknick walking through the building in apparent health after the media told us for 2 years that he had been murdered. So they were wrong about that. Okay, they got caught. Here's the interesting thing. They won't admit it. Liz Cheney's tweet is still on Twitter tonight. Officer Sicknick was killed defending our capital from the violent mob on January 6th. No correction. Anderson Cooper of CNN still has not apologized. Quote, Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight, he told us. Those are lies. So why not just admit it and move on? But they won't. In fact, this week, the White House trotted out both The press secretary and Joe Biden's attorney general, the attorney general of the United States, to claim not just that Brian Sicknick was actually murdered by Republicans at the capitol, but That other officers were murdered too. It's it's almost beyond belief. Watch this. Speaker 1: The right range of bipartisan lawmakers, as you heard Yesterday, you guys reported on it, who have condemned, this false depiction of the unprecedented violent attack on cons on our constitution and the rule of law, Which cost police police, officers their lives. Speaker 2: It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy, That power is peacefully transferred from 1 administration to another. Over a 100 officers were assaulted on that day. 5 officers died. Speaker 0: Five officers died on that day. Now that's just not some guy on Twitter. That's the attorney general of the United States. That's a man Whose honesty is central to his job. If you had a choice between IQ and integrity in an attorney general, of course, you would go with integrity because it's essential. But Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, is a liar. He just lied about something that is provably false. Who are these 5 officers who were, quote, killed that day? Notice he didn't tell you. No one ever tells you. No one ever shows you their autopsies. They don't want any detail. They just want the slogan. Now they're counting Brian Sicknick. That's a lie. But who are the other 4? Well, those are 4 officers who killed themselves after January 6th. In some cases, long after January 6th. But their suicides, we know for a fact, were the result of the Republican mob at the capitol. It's just it's just false. And it's not some esoteric fact. That fact is available to anyone who has Internet access. No police officers died that day on January 6th. None. Not one. Some were assaulted. That is true. And their assaults are indefensible. So how many were assaulted? Well, Garland said over a100. The government accountability office says the number is 114. We're just gonna roll with that. Don't know if it's true, but we'll take it at face value, and that is bad. We are opposed to assaulting police officers in any context. We said that On January 6, 2020, almost yet again, we're against that. But is January 6th the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War? That's insane. It's not even close.
Fourth police officer dies by suicide after Capitol riot, family confirms A fourth police officer who responded to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6 has died by suicide, according to his family. fox5dc.com
January 6: Merrick Garland LIED! No Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

In hindsight, the deep state did one hell of a job and Pelosi was one hell of an actress. The power of the camera, when magnified, can depict any image one wants. That’s why it’s called Tell-A-Vision! Professional film crews, FBI & Aunt-Tifa to display & incite violence, her producer daughter was even there… I especially like the big ass X on the couch at the 3:09 mark, like it’s a marker for Nancy’s fat ass to sit. History will reflect January 6 as one of the greatest psyops ever performed on the American people…. Along with Covid. Follow me down the rabbit hole 🕳️ https://rumble.com/v2cky9w-january-6-pelosi-deserves-an-oscar-professional-film-crews.-find-the-x.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Capitol is under attack as people breach the doors and windows. Senators are in lockdown and putting on gas masks in preparation for a breach. They are requesting more security personnel and the National Guard has been called in. The concern for personal safety is high, with the blame placed on the president. There is a discussion about evacuating the Capitol and finding an alternative location to continue proceedings. It is mentioned that it may take days to clean up the damage. Official channels estimate that the situation will be resolved within an hour.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're still we're trying to get surrounded. They're taking the, north front scaffolding. We'll be in this. We'll get more ammunition. We're not gonna be able to hire them. The door has been breached, and people are gaining access into the capital. Speaker 1: We have got to get to finish the proceedings. Speaker 0: USA. USA. Speaker 2: Senator Schumer is at a secure location and they're locked down in the Senate. Speaker 1: There has to be some way we can maintain the Sense that people have that there is some security or some confidence That government can function and that we can elect the President of the United States. Did we go back into session? We did go back in succession. Speaker 2: But now apparently everybody on the floor is putting on to gas masks to prepare for a breach. I'm trying Speaker 1: to get more information, putting on their tear gas masks. Speaker 0: We need a area for the house members. They're all walking over now through the tunnel. Speaker 2: I'm gonna call up the effing secretary of DoD. We have some senators who are still in their hideaways that need massive personnel now. Can you Speaker 3: It's a Maryland National Guard to come to. Speaker 1: I have something to say, mister secretary. Well, I'm gonna call the the mayor of Washington DC right now and see what, other outreach she has other police department that's that your foreigner has mentioned. Hi, Governor. This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the Virginia National Guard. Mr. Hoyer was I was speaking to Governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the The federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction? Speaker 2: Thank you. Oh, my gosh. Speaker 1: They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it's just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States. Okay. Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. And If Speaker 0: you don't Speaker 1: mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you. Speaker 2: Okay. Thank you. Bye bye. Virginia Guard has been called in. Speaker 1: You're not just talking to governor Northam, And what he said is, they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard. They're breaking windows and going in, obviously, ransacking our offices and all the rest of that. That's nothing. The concern we have about personal harm. Personal safety is just Transcends everything, but the fact is on any given day, they're breaking the law in many different ways. And Quite frankly, much of it at the instigation of the president of the United States. And now, if if he could could at least, Somebody. Speaker 2: Yeah. Why don't you get the president to tell them to leave the capital, mister attorney general, and your law enforcement responsibility, A public statement they should all leave. This cannot be just we're waiting for so and so. We need them there now, whoever you got. You have had you also have troops. This is steady hoyer. Speaker 1: Okay. So we have a to make that decision. Speaker 2: Andrews Air Force Base. Alright. Other military bases. Thank you. We need active duty, National Guard. How soon in the future can you have the place evacuated, the clothing cleaned out? Speaker 0: I I don't wanna speak for the leadership that's going to be responsible for in executing the Speaker 1: Or the hotel or some other entity that was under siege. And let me say you can logistically get people there. Imagine make the front. How we can get this job done today. You talked to Mitch about it earlier. He's not in the room right now, but he was with us earlier And said we want to expedite this and hope that they could confine to just 1 complaint, Arizona, and then we could vote and that would be, front. Then just move forward with the rest of the state. The overriding wish is to do it at the capital. What we are being told very directly is It's going to take days for the capital to be okay again. We've gotten a very bad report about the condition I would go to the house floor with defecation and all that kind of thing as well. I don't think that that's hard to clean up. But I do think it is more from a security standpoint of making sure that everybody is out of the building and how long will that take. I just got off the device president. Speaker 2: And I got off with the vice president elect. Okay. Speaker 1: But what we left the conversation with, because he said, I had the impression from Mitch that Mitch wants everybody back to do it there. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: I said, well, we're getting a counterpoint that It could take time to clean up the poo poo that they're making all over the room literally and figuratively in the capital and that but it may take days to get back. Speaker 0: And so I'm at the Capitol building. I'm literally standing with, the chief of of the US Capitol Police. Can you just inform me what you will hear through official channels? Paul Irving, your Sergeant and Arms will inform you that their best information is that they believe that, the New house and the senate will be able, to read the fee in roughly an hour. Speaker 2: Good news.
January 6: Pelosi Deserves an Oscar— Professional Film Crews. Find the X Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Even Nancy Pelosi’s daughter believes the J6 narrative was complete horseshit. 2:43 Pelosi: “The Shaman did noth(ing)… What did the Shaman do? He stood there.” 4:24 “After the Democrats lose the house, then they get rid of the committee, people may lose I think interest… no one is going to care after the democrats are out of power. And you take Biden out of office- then who cares!?” 4:47 “DC is a lot of people who work for the government. I don’t think they’re sympathetic. If you got it moved (changed trial jurisdiction from DC) you’d totally get off” (laughs while saying this) 6:48 “If there was an insurrection… you were supposed to have a plan!” “It was the sorriest insurrection in history” 8:09 “You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day” 14:50 Pelosi talks about her friendship with Gavin McInnes and laughs at the notion that Proud Boys are white supremacists. https://rumble.com/v29wdt4-bombshell-nancy-pelosis-daughter-caught-on-tape-refuting-the-j6-narrative.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their plans to attend an event and bring a camera. They talk about getting on a list and filling out a form for information. They mention a lawyer and question whether he got a good or bad deal. They discuss the possibility of an appeal and the potential for a longer sentence. They mention the shaman's sentence and criticize the disparity in sentencing. They talk about the upcoming trial and the potential for bias in the jury. They mention the difficulty of moving the trial and discuss a woman who got a DUI and caused a fatal accident. They mention receiving threats and the involvement of the FBI. They briefly mention their connection to Gavin McGinnis and the comical nature of the Proud Boys.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So how am I gonna get in? I need to know what we Speaker 1: Only will be Can you is there a Speaker 0: Oh, he needs to put you on the list. Yeah. But the problem is is that I wanna go with a camera. I will put you on the list. I will make some contacts, and I will try to camera? I'm thinking of maybe Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm the camera guy because I want to meet him too. Hey. I'm gonna need the camera guy. Speaker 0: You need to get information. They have copy of this? There's a form. There's a form you can fill. I'll get you the information. I'll get you the terms. Thank you. Speaker 2: You're welcome. Speaker 0: Now do you know anything about his, First of all, do you think that he's a, no. Do you think that he got good deal or bad deal? Speaker 1: I don't know. A I'm gonna Speaker 2: say He's the one who got The lawyer went away? Speaker 1: Yes. The lawyers. Alright. Okay. Speaker 0: Let me tell you what happened. He okay. His lawyer, Patrick got it. Right? So he was in reserves. Old guy. Old guy. He is a lawyer, but he's also in the reserves. Speaker 2: Right. Right. Speaker 0: And he also is very very religious. So what he does when you come in, let's say you're the client. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: The first thing he does Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And blah blah blah. All that. So then, he says you have to do god wants you to make right. You go right to the judge, tell him you did everything, thing? And just and and just face the music, period. So he did that, but then he got a new lawyer who I have not talked to because I'm not sure I trust the new lawyer. Because, first of all, he's he gets out May 18th. Is the lawyer gonna be able to get Before then? I mean, it's already January. February. Conviction. Yeah. Was there anyone a conviction? Yeah. Speaker 2: But you know, you could appeal it. Like, I mean, then it comments, like, you're not gonna make the felon? You could still you still have status to appeal. You Speaker 0: can give an appeal. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. You win the appeal overturning. So he gets some incentive. Yeah. Like Speaker 0: So some days, did the shaman do? He stood there. What Speaker 2: I told Speaker 0: him, he stood there. The shaman got how many months? Speaker 2: Right. 41. Speaker 0: Book to get bigger? Like, people are criticizing some of Speaker 2: the people Speaker 0: that Right. Right. A lot of people were getting probation and stuff. So I think they're looking to make People like, I think if Paul went now, he'd get a bigger a longer sentence. Speaker 2: What what did he do? Okay. What did he do? He went He Speaker 0: just walked me with the trunk flag in the sand? Speaker 2: That's it. That's it. Speaker 0: That's it. I need that. So I don't know if the balance was was good or bad. Speaker 1: Well, for the charge I'm looking from a charging point of view of 15.12. Speaker 0: See, you didn't walk into that. You walk me into the settings. Speaker 1: But I didn't do event? Speaker 0: I know. That's what I'm saying. That's the bad thing. Speaker 1: I wasn't even there to say it. A lot of these people are like, we're here to overturn the I wasn't even there for that reason. I was not there to overturn anything. Speaker 2: I I think a thing about it? He used him to to shore up their 15 12 charge too. Because if they have people fleeing to it, they're telling the judge is good. We already have people who pledge this felony. So though? If you overturn it for 1 case, you're gonna overturn all the prior conditions. It puts more pressure on these district judges not to over return in? Because he's, oh, we have Paul. He's gonna plead guilty to the 15/12. But they dropped everything but the 15/12. The charge they never used before. A so they're like, oh, this guy will take 8 months. And we'll we'll have another plea. They make every single person charged with the 15/12, plead a difference between 12? I was thinking to drop it. Speaker 0: I'm very Speaker 1: interested on the 1st Speaker 0: trial, how Speaker 1: that's gonna look like. Well, I think Speaker 0: the one thing, if you drag it out, chance? It's like anniversary. The first one is a big deal. They're gonna really be a big deal in your state. No one's gonna care after the Democrats are a power. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm gonna do that. Speaker 1: The jury that's Speaker 0: The jury is The jury is Speaker 2: We we need to see how there. Well, if Speaker 0: you guys wanted to totally shut off. I I wish you push at all? I'm waiting for them to successfully move it? Speaker 2: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard the hearings. Speaker 1: The logos deleted me. Speaker 2: Those if they're gonna say They're gonna say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. And then it is very the last time the government move to trial with the Oklahoma City bomber? They agreed to move into Colorado. So that's a stipulated. Even the Boston bomber case, which just now an appeal to Boston the city of Boston or the federal judge here? What do you mean it can't be fair? Motion gets signed by the judge They say yes. Yes. Speaker 1: But then but but Speaker 2: there might be more favorable up the line? You know, we go to the I'm not using DC Circuit of Appeals to the Supreme Court. They might say, wait a second. You're you have politicians Speaker 0: every night comparing it to Pearl Harbor. 9/11. That was just deep. Speaker 2: Looking at the variant to Pearl Harbor 911 And that was just deep Deeps are under siege. Had natural budget for 7 months. If you live there, you're like, I am under siege. I see natural guardsmen around here? You know, my my city was attacked. The local the local media everyday. You can't have a fair trial. Speaker 0: Well, the reason see, I think gonna remember January 6th. Right now, people are still looking for stupid. We need stuff to fill. I mean, if you watch 6.47. As time goes on Right. It's gonna be less. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: And as as as So I think I think also people are gonna lose their their office the jobs. The people that were there for Lucerne Johnson, it's not gonna need anything if you weren't even there. I know we Speaker 2: need, like, a word breakout. Speaker 0: No. No. It's right at all. Okay. I I I thank you for your time. Listen, I really, Speaker 2: typical bad guy? Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan? Is that if there was If there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line, Martin. You're in the military. You know? Right? Speaker 1: No. It doesn't. Speaker 0: There was no plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. So you're offering a you sit down overnight with your soldiers. You go over. Alright? You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this site. At this time, we're gonna take over this. There's none of that. Speaker 2: He's doing the impression. He's a sorry in his direction in in the 20 21st century ever. It's no guns. Speaker 1: A guy's playing. A guy's fucking behind you on Speaker 0: I love the guy. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm like I'm like Speaker 0: Well, we do that. We could just do it after last week for the guy that just was ringing Speaker 1: Well, my favorite my favorite guy holding Speaker 0: Mister Webb? Speaker 1: He got no. Speaker 0: He he he got it. Speaker 2: He's dead. He's dead. Speaker 1: I'll wait for a sentence. He's right. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, what's he gonna get? Speaker 2: Probably in a few months. I don't know. I'm not sure right now. We'll just go, you know, from this You're Speaker 0: gonna be able to laugh about this one Then I would just wait. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Because I wouldn't the 1st child, like, this I was in Ohio with this guy who is going to file? He wants to subpoena Trump and make it, like, this whole it's for, like I Speaker 1: heard it. No. Speaker 0: They're not gonna they're not gonna It's gonna be You're not Speaker 2: gonna allow that. You're not gonna name? Is the district Speaker 1: judge I just want a subpoena people involved with my team. For example, that officer that I gave water, the guy that interviewed me Probably, maybe 1 more person. But other than that, I want people You Speaker 2: can find him, officer Lopez? Speaker 0: Yeah. Let's find him. Speaker 2: You should find him. I mean, he's If Speaker 0: you have the name, you can find him. Speaker 2: Officer little bit? We we found some stuff on. He's from, like, Speaker 1: Coachella? California? California? Speaker 0: From the place of concert center? Yeah. Yeah. That's I'll find it for you. Speaker 2: Yeah. That's Somebody told me, like, oh, he's Coachella guy. And I was like, is he the constant? Like, no. He's from the city. Oh. Oh. Oh. He has a catalog? He has a different Local Coachella News did a thing about bit about it? Because he got some award or something to be in capital at in the capital police in that day. But he's the one in the video where he's offering him water. And he looks shell shop? Yeah. That's why I was trying to he did Look. Speaker 0: I look for him. I look for him. Speaker 1: I did a comment, so I know that being his buddy's trying to talk to me. He's like Yeah. Speaker 0: Clipped since all we're like and, can I tell you that story? Yeah. So her condition was she took home in front of her wall the Nancy Pelosi office of the speaker sign. Oh, yeah. So she was one of the people I wanted to get to really early because know that that if I went to something like that and I took something long from my wall, I know that it It's a memento and not a step. Right. Right. Right. I knew. She's 21 years old. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: Right. This is not Right. What they're making it seem. Speaker 2: Right. Mhmm. Speaker 0: So I had lunch with her at her country club. And I was like, so what were you doing there? She's like this. Well, like, I think I went from Missouri before. Barely finished this, like, farm Right. Works on a farm. So what do you do for a lover from a family farm? I was like, and they're turning her like, public enemy number 1. And she's the most, like, almost almost you must feel sad that she's so Luckily, she has the lawyer, and the lawyer got it down. I mean, they walked to her bedroom and this whole thing on the wall. Right? So you think, oh, she's gonna go down. Got a misdemeanor. Nothing nothing nothing. And we're walking to get probation. But on the night of the anniversary of January 6th, She's drunk in a bar. Speaker 1: She got a DUI? Speaker 0: And got killed a mother. Speaker 2: Oh, she killed them. That's right. Speaker 0: And it's clear. Mistake? And now I'm just because I know her. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: What happened was when the local news starts to your guys in the army. Yeah. They they took shit. And she's like a 21 year old farm girl. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So she I mean, it wasn't really her her nature, I think, to meet her. Anyway, way was treated her way to whisper the matter in the country club. She's got Speaker 2: You got DUI mask on. Speaker 0: Charged her yet because they haven't got in touch with college or Speaker 1: with sports medicine. Uh-huh. Speaker 0: And I was with her Monday, and she said, I don't even remember any of it. And then She got she herself got, Like, like, blacked out. She was blacked out the whole time. Doesn't remember any of it. Speaker 1: And who who did she kill? Speaker 0: Or The mother. She killed them. Her unknown problem, honey. Speaker 2: She rode against traffic Speaker 0: for 6 miles. 6 miles at 60 miles an hour. And she She doesn't remember anything. Into a Speaker 2: car and this woman who was sitting next to her husband who drove husband in the hospital right diet? Speaker 1: I I heard a bug on a lie later. No. Speaker 0: But that's an example of, like, chance If you go deep, if you're really a deep it's like that's an example of, like, the kind of damage that I need. You can say, oh, we need this and shoot me fairly and they're full of shit. That's fine. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: But, like, it's not ruining your life. This has ruined her life. Mhmm. And Junior 6 was like a blip. Oh, no. But there's attention from it. Right. Right. It's free Speaker 1: traffic. Yeah. Speaker 0: They're cool. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Because it takes a lot of time too? Speaker 1: No. But it not I don't mean just the the words itself, but when you have people implement I have people calling from I have nothing to do with my business. They're stealing bad reviews on my website saying, oh, it's erection disorder. I had my secretary that's scared of going to work because she's saying Wait. Speaker 2: Hold on, hon. It's not a bad need Speaker 0: to have so I can move Speaker 2: my life or Well, you got the powder too. I got it. Speaker 1: I had maybe what's on? Like, like, the anthrax. Speaker 2: I think, yeah, we had to call out the the cops, the ups Speaker 0: the Why do people why it could be it was so weird. Speaker 2: People are so weird. And it tested positive. The first test And so And they said that somebody who knows what they're doing made sure that the the first test, it'll test positive, like a like a field test. It'll pass that until they do the actual chemical. A like, it was very premeditated. It and have, like, a letter, like, to a oh, probably I didn't get Speaker 1: a watch down and pass message. Speaker 2: In reference the the beep? Oh, no. You're thinking too loudly now. How do you like this? Speaker 1: I opened the letter. I went to work. I thought it was a pump bill or something. And when I opened my diaper, I just went like that. White powder came out. I was thinking already. Alright. Anthrax or something like that. Who knows? Crazy people. Speaker 2: And the FBI guy shows up and they're and they were they were more like it's almost like they were more interested in searching his office. You know, we were like, we didn't even trust them because they were like using it like, oh, who is he? And then we had to get the postal inspector out there to try and, like, who it was like a jurisdictional thing. Yeah. Speaker 1: It was Speaker 2: it was a mess. Speaker 1: Yeah. My employees I have about a Twenty employees. They're worried. Speaker 0: Don't you just an outstanding member of society? Okay. Do they talk about that in the court? No. Of course a That's interesting. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, no. Speaker 2: I've heard nothing wrong with that. At the trial, they will. At the trial, yeah. Status hearings is Speaker 1: very Yeah. But they're gonna probably gonna call me by supremacists. As a matter of fact, I I want it in Spanish. That was my first language. Speaker 2: So That would be fine. Speaker 1: I wanna interpreter for my next question? Speaker 0: Okay. So I want you to know that I'm from New York City, and I am was always a long time real friends with Gavin McGinnis, who supposedly got it started Speaker 2: with Brad Boys. Yes. Speaker 0: And he when you say this is a drinking club, I'm just telling you guys, I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know who Gavin is. I went on road trips with them to parties. Mhmm. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, time? This is, like, years ago, they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. 16. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may take he may touch it, but so that's why it's funny to me. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, we'll sit around the table or call each other. Hey. Where do you wanna meet up? Can you figure out where to go eat? And it's like No. Speaker 0: I know I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, and I was just like so I just want you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people. I'm like,
BOMBSHELL! Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Caught on Tape REFUTING the J6 Narrative! NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi’s Filmmaker Daughter Alexandra Pelosi Caught on Tape REFUTING J6 NARRATIVE – Admitting Jan. 6 Protests Not an Insurrection, DC Courts Too Biased Read the breakdow rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

The J6 Committee lied about what happened as tapes were eventually released by Tucker Carlson. This tape overturns the single most powerful political lie democrats have used regarding J6. It gets even better… The J6 committee KNEW Brian Sitnick was alive and well after he was supposedly “murdered” by Trump supporters. The investigators working on behalf of the J6 committee saw this footage & electronically bookmarked the this tape, but it never saw the light of day… until Tucker Carlson. https://rumble.com/v2c0y5c-january-6-new-video-shatters-narrative-on-police-officer-brian-sitnick-deat.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, there were claims of a deadly insurrection at the Capitol, but the video evidence shows otherwise. While some violence occurred, the majority of the chaos was peaceful. The media falsely reported that Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by the mob, but surveillance footage shows him walking in the Capitol unharmed. This contradicts the narrative that he was murdered by Trump supporters. The January 6th committee had access to this footage but chose not to release it, as it would undermine their political agenda. The truth about what happened that day is being concealed for political gain.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within hours of January 6th, literally hours, you began to hear that day described as a deadly insurrection, not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician, but in unison by all of them. Almost like it was coordinated, a deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves it was neither an insurrection nor deadly. Here it is. Dis January 6th, when an estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building, causing the deaths of 5 police officers. Speaker 1: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001, And January 6th. The mob beat officers with anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher. Diss Police officers died. Speaker 0: Donald Trump supporters who, of course, rioted and killed police officers. By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day. They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand, into a single emotionally related political slogan, which they repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th, they said, was a deadly insurrection. There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up. He incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 1: Incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 2: The violent deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months just Go. It was about white supremacy in my view. Speaker 0: A deadly insurrection. Everything about that phrase is a lie. Very little about January 6th was organized were violent. Surveillance video from inside the Capitol shows mostly peaceful chaos, but the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it. To prove the insurrection was deadly, just began disappointed to the death of an officer called Brian Sicknick. The mob killed officer Brian Sicknick. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years. They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnek was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Cichnek died after being hit in the head with a fire distinguish her during the fight. That story came from the New York Times, which is effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media. It was a lie, untrue in any way. But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it. Speaker 1: The New York Times has dis Quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick. Speaker 0: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself, a Trump disorder, had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the left. His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Sicknick's body lay in state in the capital rotunda, where a parade of the politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden. Speaker 2: Breaking down the doors, trying to overturn an outcome of election, And killing several police officers in the meantime. Speaker 0: But Brian Cygnik should not be reduced to a prop for the political ambitions of the Democratic Party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter, including how he died. To this day, media accounts describe Sicknick as someone who was, quote, slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie. Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capital after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside. By all appearances, Sicknick is healthy and vigorous. He's wearing a helmet, so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie the Democrats have told us about January 6th, dis and it was indeed a lie. The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through just after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters, and they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage which contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system. That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party he reviewed this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why? Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth disturb their political interests. They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do
January 6: New Video Shatters Narrative on how Police Officer Brian Sickick Died! The J6 Committee KNEW & Ignored it! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

The best person to talk to on law enforcement side would be the Capitol Police Chief… but for some reason he was silenced… Fox News Deleted this Scene from Tucker Carlson’s Interview with the Capitol Police Chief “Leaks” Saying, “It was a Cover Up!” Why would Fox News delete this scene? “If people were reporting to intelligence correctly. If I was allowed to do my job as the chief, we wouldn’t be here. Then seeing how, you’re lambasted in public & everything appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…” https://rumble.com/v34749c-january-6-fox-news-deletes-capitol-police-chief-saying-it-was-a-cover-up.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration at not being allowed to testify at a Senate hearing and believes that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the events of January 6th could have been prevented. They question whether there was a deliberate attempt to hide intelligence and suggest that it may have been part of a larger plan. The speaker also discusses how the events have benefited the Democratic Party but believes it is a violation of the constitution. They emphasize the importance of a fair legal system and express concern that it is no longer perceived as such.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very restrained and rational and not give a statement, obviously, but the facts that you're describing are shocking. Speaker 1: The reason why I've had a lot of people ask me, you know, why did you write this book? I try to do what I can to get the truth out. Yes. You know, they didn't want me to testify in, in February February 23rd at the senate hearing. They don't want people that's still In positions, I actually had to go in and talk to a friend of mine on one of the oversight committees say, I will come there in person. I want to be there. I want to testify. So I'm glad you think I'm reserved. I'm, you know, to be honest with you, I'm a little pissed off, because If if people were reporting intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, I got a significant experience. I was allowed to do my job as chief, We wouldn't be here today. This didn't happen. Then see how, you know, you're out there, you're land based in public, and it's all you know, everything Appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information intelligence that it had, military had, it's all watered down. I'm not getting intelligence. I'm denied support National Guard in advance. I'm denied National Guard while we're under attack for 71 minutes. You're in a fight? Yeah. A fight for a couple of minutes. Speaker 0: Yeah. 1 you out. 1 minute. Speaker 1: I was gonna say, 60 seconds, 3 minutes. Hey. Let me tell you. It wears you out. My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before the the protesters Wait. Speaker 0: Can I say so you describe this as a failure to get the intelligence people who needed it? But it sounds like worse than it sounds like they were hiding the intelligence. Speaker 1: And that's what I'm getting at is Could there possibly be that actually did something happen and kinda wanted something happen? It doesn't it's not a far stretch to begin. Speaker 0: I don't know what the other explanation is. Speaker 1: It's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out. It gets concerning what was our end goal. You look at look at what's happening. Was that their end goal? I don't know. Speaker 0: Well, I mean, there's no question that what happened on January 6th as really helped the Democratic Party. It's bravely politicized the U. S. Military And the intelligence agencies and the FBI, and those are all, I think, bad for America and violations of The constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party. That's the fact. Like, that's what happened. Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I I write about that because As a cop of 30 years, I'm I'm a rule of law type of guy. Yeah. You know, there's a reason that Lady Justice is depicted with a blindfold. As soon as you cut that blindfold off, the fairness of our legal system goes out goes out the window. And that is exactly what has happened. They have stripped up blindfold away from Lady Justice, And there no. It's not perceived as being fair anymore.
January 6 - Fox News Deletes Capitol Police Chief Saying it was a Cover Up in Tucker Carlson Interview Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

After Tucker Carlson was Freed from Fox… he interviewed, then Capitol Police Chief, Steve Sund again… this time no filters. Four Clips. Four Breakdowns. Intelligence Failures, They Knew, Pelosi & McConnell were in On It. Nancy Pelosi Withheld the National Guard CLIP 1 January 6 - Former Capital Police Chief Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From FBI Steve D’Antuono, Chris Miller & General Milley A senate report talks about multiple emails that were circulating just days prior to January 6, talking about the violence they were anticipating at the Capital. Steve Sund had a video call with FBI Steve D’Antuono prior to J6 and there were no mentions of violence. Here’s where it gets weird… The then Secretary of Defense, Chris Miller, along with General Milley both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC, because “they were worried about violence” & revoking permits on Capital Hill. “You know who issues the permits on Capital Hill for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn’t told? Me.” On January 4th, Chris Miller puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, although internally they were expecting violence. 🤔 This action also affected the National Guard of Virginia & Maryland from being allowed to respond at first. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36droa-january-6-steve-sund-wasnt-told-about-key-intelligence-over-concerns-of-vio.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Steve Sund- General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, Kept it from the Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress An investigative reporter from The Washington Post discovered General Milley was using an intelligence platform called DataMinr to come across intelligence on his own. “He’s picking up intelligence talking about killing members of Congress & attacking the Capital, and he’s not telling me. He’s telling select members of Congress That’s concerning as hell!” This Clip https://rumble.com/v36dyu3-january-6-steve-sund-general-milley-had-intelligence-of-violence-and-murder.html CLIP 3 January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on it! They Denied Capital Police Chief Steve Sund with Federal Assistance TWICE Tucker: This was handled very difference— by whom? Steve Sund: 1. By the intelligence agencies 2. By the Military “Congress passed a law that requires me to go the Sergeant of Arms (Capital Police Board) in advance of an event to request Federal Resources such as the National Guard. I was denied Twice, by the Sargent of Arms Paul D. Irving & Sargent of Arms Michael Conrad Stenger who BOTH resigned January 7, 2021.” WHO DO THEY WORK FOR? Nancy Pelosi on the House Side. Mitch McConnel on the Senate Side. Notice Tucker was fishing for just this answer. BOOM! This Video https://rumble.com/v36e4ue-january-6-nancy-pelosi-and-mitch-mcconnell-denied-steve-sund-federal-assist.html CLIP 4 January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard “I’m the only Chief of Police that in the United States that has a law to bring in the National Guard” 12:58pm “I make my first call to the Sargent of Arms Paul Irving, requesting a Declaration of Emergency & bring in the military & Federal resources.” Paul Irving Responds: “I’ll run it up the Chain, I’ll get back to you.” —> Nancy Pelosi Paul Irving “didn’t have to run it up the chain (Pelosi) because it was an emergency, but he wouldn’t grant authorization. “My next call was over to Mike Stenger. Mike Stenger Responded: What did Paul tell you? Let’s wait to hear from Paul. 71 minutes go by & I make 32 calls. 71<>17 “The first people to offer assistance was the United States Secret Service. By law, I shouldn’t have requested their assistance until I had approval. But I’m looking at my men & women having their added handed to them, and my first thought was F*ck it! I will take whatever discipline there is.” That’s the one text the Secret Service turned over after they “lost all their texts” 🤔 2:09pm 71 minutes later, Steve Sund is finally given approval for the National Guard This Clip https://rumble.com/v36ec9w-january-6-71-minutes-to-get-federal-assistance.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Steve D'Antwono, the FBI director, received multiple emails warning about the violence expected at the Capitol before January 6th, but nothing was mentioned during a video call with him. The military had discussed locking down Washington DC and revoking permits on Capitol Hill due to concerns about violence. However, on January 4th, the acting secretary of defense issued a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying weapons or equipment for crowd control. This decision hindered the National Guard's response when assistance was desperately needed on January 6th. Governor Hogan even pleaded for help but was denied due to the memo. The situation doesn't make sense.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Steve D'Antwono, who's the Washington field office, FBI director, you look at the GAO report that came out February of this year, it talks about, multiple emails. It's a GAO report or maybe no, it's a Senate report that just came out, in July, just last month, talks about multiple emails going to Steve D'Antwonio on Sunday, Monday and some probably Tuesday, just the days before, talking about the violence that they're predicting coming up to the capital. And I have a video call with him on that Tuesday and nothing said about it. I mean, that's not a word, not a word. Speaker 1: So not to repeat myself, but that does not make sense. Speaker 0: It doesn't. It doesn't. Especially when you think about think about this, the military, the United States military, and this gets really convoluted once you get into the bonds on January 6 and how I was delayed getting resources. You have the United States military, secretary of defense or acting secretary of defense Miller enacting and, General Milley had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6th Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol Hill because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hills for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn't told? Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller deal. He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense. Speaker 1: Wait. Wait. So The military says we're so concerned about potential imminent violence that we are considering shutting down the city. But at the very same time, they decide that the National Guard can't adopt an aggressive posture. Speaker 0: Right. Right. They're deploying because they're going to be deploying National regard to assist in Washington DC with crowd control at metros and some of the traffic, control areas. But they put this out on January 4th, specific to January 5th 6th, and this direction affected the National Guard in Virginia and Maryland. When I was calling begging for assistance on January 6th, they weren't allowed to respond at first. Look at, governor Hogan. He did a press conference saying he was begging to respond and he was not being denied by the Pentagon, all because of the memo.
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Milley, the military's top officer, has been accused of using an intelligence platform called Data Miner to uncover information about potential threats to the United States Capitol and members of Congress. However, he allegedly failed to inform everyone who should have been notified, including the speaker. This raises concerns about the duty to warn and the need for necessary action to be taken. The details were revealed by investigative reporter Carol Leonning in her book.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Begging to respond and who is not being denied by the Pentagon all because of the memo. So why? You begin to wonder why and especially when you look at things like something that I recently came across, when you talk about the military. General Milley, we're now finding out, and it's not for me, this is from Carol Leonning, investigative reporter with The Washington Post, Has found that he was using Data Miner on his own coming across intelligence Tell us what Data Miner is. So Data Miner is an intelligence platform. It's not something your average citizen would have on their A computer. I I guess it goes in and does crawling across webs. I'm not really sure how it works. Yes. But it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform. He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of congress and attacking the United States Capitol, and he's not telling me. He's telling select members of congress. I mean, Carol Wenning writes about it in her book. That's concerning as hell because as the chief of police, you know, he there's a duty to warn there, and I should be told so I can take the necessary action. I don't know who else he was telling, but he sure wasn't telling me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the handling of the event was different from previous situations. They mention that the decision was made by the intelligence agency and the military. According to a federal law, the speaker was required to request federal resources like the National Guard in advance from the Capitol Police Board. However, they were denied twice due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The decision was made by Paul Irving and Mike Stenger, who work for Pelosi and McConnell respectively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big picture, just to restate, you've seen many things like this. And as you just said, this was very different. This was handled very differently. By whom? Speaker 1: By by the intelligence. I'd say 1 by the intelligence agency, 2 by the military. So the reason why I say the military, think of this, By federal law. You know, congress passed a law that that requires me to go to the 2 to the Sergeant Arms Capitol Police Board In advance of an event and to request, federal resources such as the National Guard. So congress passed a law. It's 2 US code 1970. Look it up. Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on the 6th? That requires me to go and get approval For bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance, I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from congressional leadership in advance like I did on January 3rd. I'm denied twice Because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it. So think about that. Speaker 0: May I ask you who made that decision? Who denied you? Speaker 1: I was denied by Paul Irving, House Sergeant Arms, and also Mike Stenger, senate sergeant arms. And who do they On January 3rd Speaker 0: Who do they work for? Speaker 1: It would have been working for Pelosi on the house side, that Pelosi was the number one boss And then McConnell on the Senate side.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, who is the chief of police, expresses frustration over the law that prevents them from bringing in the national guard without approval. They recount the events of the attack on the Capitol and their efforts to request assistance. They made multiple calls to different agencies, including the sergeant in arms and the chairman of the Capitol Police Board, but authorization was delayed for 71 minutes. Finally, at 2:09, they received approval and immediately informed their colleague. The speaker emphasizes their anger and marks the time as 2:10 when they finally got approval for the National Guard.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Capitol Police Board I mean, it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me, not just regulations, rules that say I gotta go and need approval to bring in the national guard, a law. So that's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergencies. So think of this. Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the national guard to be brought in. I have 340 national guard that have been activated. At least a 150 to a 180 of are in the city, many of them within eyesight of the capital. Okay? We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I called the Washington DC Police Department. I their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll. Thank god I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU, platoons up there. Called him and said, hey. Please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they they came to their west front and they started attacking, it was gonna be bad. 12/58, I make my 1st call to the sergeant in arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad. We need assistance. I need a declaration of emergency. I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources. I'm told by Paul Irving quote, I'm gonna run up the chain. I'll get back to you. Speaker 1: The chain is Pelosi. Speaker 0: The chain is his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The the law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he'd run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stenger. He's the now with the chairman of the Capitol Police Board. Told them the same thing. We're getting our asses handed to us on the left front. I need federal resources. He said, what did Paul tell you? Said he's run up the chain. Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So for the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center. I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law, you know, one of the first people to offer assistance was United States Secret Service. And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval, but I'm looking at my men and women having their asses handed to them. And and my first thought was fuck it. I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the 1 tech secret service turned over. You know how they lost all their texts? Yes. It's the text between their, chief chief Sullivan and myself. Thank god for him. Speaker 1: I don't so can we just so you make this call immediately Immediately. To the house sergeant in arms who reports mister Irving who reports to Nancy Pelosi. He says I'll call Pelosi. Speaker 0: He says I'm a run it up the chain. Speaker 1: Run it up the chain, but that is the chain. Speaker 0: Not here. Not here. I got you. I'm just I wanna tell you exactly what Speaker 1: you mean. What happens then? Does he get back to you? Speaker 0: So for the next 71 minutes, I make the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies. 11 of those calls are follow-up calls. And look in the the senate combined report from from 2001. They have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call. 11 times I call, and the next several minutes going, where are we on the approval? Where are we in the approval? Just any minute now. Any minute I'm gonna get in any minute. Finally, at 209, 71 minutes later, 209, I'm finally given approval. Think about that. 71 minutes later, I immediately called Mike Stenger, said we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made sure that this watch commander, I'm in the command center. I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant that's my watch commander. I said, John, mark the time as 2/10. I finally got approval for the National Guard. I was that mad
January 6 - Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From Chris Miller & General Miller Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, But Didn’t Share it with The Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on It! Denied Steve Sund Federal Assistance Twice Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Four More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They don’t want to get to the bottom of J6 • They Did Not Want The Capitol Police Chief to Testify • Nancy Pelosi was Off Limits & wasn’t allowed to be investigated • The Pentagon Call & the Set Up CLIP 1 When the Former Capital Police Chief who was there on January 6 says “it doesn’t seem like people want to get to the bottom of J6” That alone says everything. https://rumble.com/v36eiub-january-6-steve-sund-it-doesnt-seem-like-people-want-to-get-to-the-bottom-o.html CLIP 2 January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify “I fought to testify, they didn’t want me to testify in the Senate Hearing. When they first put out the notice, it was for only current employees that were still in place. - This would exclude Paul Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi. - It would have excluded Mike Stenger, who reports to Mitch McConnell. It would have excluded, Steve Sund, the Capital Police Chief. ….All The key people at the top of the security apparatus who would know the answers to the key questions. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36emna-january-6-they-didnt-want-the-chief-of-capital-police-to-testify-in-the-j6-.html CLIP 3 Oh Snaps 👀 January 6 - Democrat Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was “OFF LIMITS” for any Inquiry into January 6 “When they were talking about the the January 6 Committee coming out, I think it was Representative Bennie Thompson that said, Speaker Pelosi was OFF LIMITS… So they wouldn’t get any of her records, her phone records, and any inquiries into January 6.” OH BOY! I hope to God Trump uses his Subpoena Power on that evil WITCH! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36etwx-january-6-bennie-thompson-said-nancy-pelosi-was-off-limits-for-inquiry-into.html CLIP 4 January 6 - Steve Sund - The Pentagon Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - Tucker “It Sounds like a Set-Up!” Verrry Interesting… 2:34pm “I get a notification to get on a call with the US Pentagon. I have to sell my request for the National Guard. I’m on the call with a Lieutenant [Walter] Piatt, and General [Charles] Flynn… and it was mainly General Piatt that I’m speaking with. **I’m assuming it’s Charles Flynn given I don’t know any other active General with the name Flynn. Interesting he’s on this call. 🤔 Piatt’s Response: “I don’t like the optics of the National Guard on Capital Hill.” “While I’m begging for assistance, The Pentagon sent in resources to guard General’s houses to protect their homes & not the [US Capital]. So you begin to think, it seems a little conspiratorial. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I can see where somebody can begin to go down that rabbit hole.” 🕳️.. . … 🐇 All people & agencies involved all came to the same conclusion that they were not going to protect the US Capital. This Video https://rumble.com/v36fd1n-january-6-steve-sund-call-with-walter-piatt-and-general-flynn-it-sounds-lik.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expressed confusion about the lack of answers regarding two significant events on January 6. Firstly, other federal agencies withheld crucial information from the speaker, who was in charge of security at the Capitol. Secondly, despite the situation escalating for 71 minutes, Speaker Pelosi denied permission to bring in the National Guard. The speaker questioned why there is a lack of investigation into these matters, suggesting a lack of interest in uncovering the truth. The situation is described as worsening beyond these events.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't understand. So we I don't they were only 10 minutes into this, and you've told me 2 things. 1, the other federal agencies withheld critical information from you in charge of security at the capital before January 6. And once it started and things got out of control for 71 minutes, Pelosi refused to allow you to bring in the National Guard. So those are just those are 2 of the biggest questions from January 6. And my question is, why don't we have answers to why that happened? It doesn't seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it. It really it really doesn't. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks why Paul Irving, who had the authority, didn't give the okay. Speaker 1 explains that he testified at the Senate hearing in 2021 and disagreed with Speaker 1's recollection. Speaker 1 turned over his phone records and fought to testify. Speaker 0 questions why Speaker 1 wasn't allowed to testify since he was the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1 explains that initially, the hearing was only for current employees, excluding the top 3 people in security. Speaker 1 called someone on the rules committee to request testifying and promised to show up in person. Speaker 0 highlights the denial of Speaker 1's request for national guardsmen, which was a pivotal moment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Paul Irving, the guy who had, you're saying, the statutory authority to to give that okay to, Has he ever explained why he didn't? Speaker 1: Oh, his they had him, and he testified at the Senate hearing in 2001. In 2021? I'm sorry. 2021. My apologies. Thank you for catching. And a couple of times, he he, disagreed with my recollection. I can tell you my phone records. I turned them over immediately. I fought to testify. They didn't want me to testify in the Senate hearing. I fought to testify. Speaker 0: Why wouldn't there's no share. Why who didn't want you to testify? You were the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1: You and me are on lockstep with this. And my story hasn't changed in two and a half years. So when they first put out the notice, when they were talking about having the hearing, it was only for current employees that were still in place. No long no one that was no longer in place in their position in security. So think about that. Initially, when they put up the request to have the and they put up the they were talking about having the hearing, it would have excluded Paul Irving, would have excluded Mike Stinger, and it would have excluded me. Only 3 people, the 3 people at the top of the security apparatus. So the Speaker 0: Democrats, I think. Speaker 1: Well, it was joint. It was a combined joint. I hear you. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. You're absolutely right. Of course. The unit party intentionally excluded the 3 people who would know the answers to the key questions. Speaker 1: Yeah, the original plan was to exclude them. I immediately called somebody I knew on the rules committee And said, please let me testify. I will be there in person. And I still remember, she said, you'll show up in person. I said, I promise you, I will be there in person. I want to testify. And I was the only one that showed up in person. Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help. That is it. That's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name
Video Transcript AI Summary
The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th remains a pivotal moment. The person responsible for that decision is known, but the reason behind it is still unknown. There has been no answer to that question. Additionally, Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits and her records would not be obtained by the J6 committee. However, she was in charge of the House that day. It is important to uncover the truth and understand what truly happened. Otherwise, it seems absurd, like a scene from a play.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help, that is that's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name of the man who made that decision. And we still don't know why he made that decision. And that's just shocking to me. What has he ever answered that question? Speaker 1: No. He's he's never answered that question Specifically, that I'm aware of. And I do know when they were talking about the j six, committee coming out, I think it was, representative Bennie Thompson that had said Speaker Pelosi is off limits, so they wouldn't get any of her records, her phone records. What do you Speaker 0: mean she's off limits? Speaker 1: I believe that was one of the things he said that that her coming into this was she was off limits to the inquiries to the Jane years. Speaker 0: Well, she was running the house that day. Speaker 1: I hear you. I hear you. That I mean, if Speaker 0: we're truly trying to get Speaker 1: to the bottom of this, to find out what happened. Speaker 0: Other than that, missus Lincoln, I mean, that's insane.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urgently called General Walker to request the National Guard's assistance at the Capitol. Despite the imminent danger, the speaker faced resistance from higher-ups who didn't like the optics of the National Guard's presence. The speaker pleaded for help, but was denied multiple times. Eventually, shots were fired, and the speaker had to hang up to handle the situation. The National Guard didn't arrive until 6 PM, and instead of being deployed at the Capitol, they were driven back to the DC Army. The speaker felt betrayed and questioned if there was a conspiracy against protecting the Capitol. The systematic denial of intelligence and support from various agencies led to the baffling conclusion of not protecting the capital.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Called general Walker at 151. I was like, I can't wait any freaking longer. I call him. I said, send me the National Guard as quick as you can. I'm gonna get approval any minute because he asked, so you have approval from the Capitol Police Board? And I said I'll have approval any minute. Please just get them coming this way. So they're within eyesight. Shortly after 209, I talked to them. 234, I get a notification to get on the call with United States Pentagon. I have to sell my request to the National Guard. Along the call with a lieutenant general Piat Piat, trying to make sure I have his name pronounced right, and a, general Flynn is on the call. Ever and it's mainly a pilot that I'm, that I'm speaking with. I get on the call, Mayor Bautista on the call, Chief Conti is on the call, And I said, I need the National Guard immediately. This is an urgent, urgent situation. I still remember saying urgent twice. This is urgent, urgent. They're gonna be looking at the same TVs I'm looking at. Ever I need the National Guard immediately. You know what his response is? Don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Ever like, he goes, I would rather have your officers in the fight, and we can backfill your officer somewhere else. I said, I don't have that option. All my officers are in the fight. He goes, I'm telling you, I don't like the option of the National Guard. You know, I don't like the optics of the National Guard and the Hill. I said, sir, we're having our asses hand to us. This is life or death. I need assistance immediately. Ever. And I still remember he said, you know, my recommendation is not to support the request. I still remember Robert Contee going, woah. Woah. Hold on. You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, he goes, Vegas said, not that we're denying him. I just don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Have and he goes, I'd rather and he goes back to that again. I'd rather back to all your people. I said, sure, I don't have that option. Speaker 1: This sounds like a setup to me. I'm sorry. It does. It gets better. Speaker 0: So ever I beg and beg, and he goes, well, I'm gonna walk down the hall and, you know, we'll talk to the secretary of defense or whoever is gonna he's gonna talk to. Have, right then, I get notification. Oh, so I'm still still on the call. We have the shooting of Ashley Dabbit. And I said, we have shots fired. I still remember yelling over the phone. We have shots fired on the USAI capital. Is that urgent enough for you now? Hang up the phone because now I gotta start making a notification. Gotta call the sergeant army saying, hey. We got what looks like maybe a confirmed shooting. Do you know when the National Guard finally arrived? Have a 6 PM. 6 PM, they're sworn in on post. Do you know those National Guard, the 150 to a 180 that are within eyesight of the capital? You know what they do with them? They put them in vehicles, drive them around the Capitol back to the DC Army. You know where the DC Army is. It's far away. Yeah. Washington, White House is on one side, United States Capitol, DC Army, almost equidistant on the other RFK Stadium. Yeah. Via RFK Stadium. They drive them back then, and they send me in the evening trips. Not real. Can you freaking believe it? No. That's real. That's real. And you know what else I do? While I'm begging for assistance, depending on sending resources to general's houses to protect their homes, but not me. So you begin to think it seems a little conspiratorial. I can see where somebody I'm not, you know, a conspiracy theorist, but But I could see where people begin to go down that rabbit hole real quick. Speaker 1: That rabbit hole. I mean, I don't know what the other conclusion is because, look, Under pressure, people make mistakes and make bad decisions. But you're describing a systematic denial of intelligence And then of support, defense through a whole bunch of different agencies, a whole bunch of different people, all reaching the same have a baffling conclusion that we're not going to protect the capital.
January 6 - Steve Sund - It Doesn’t Seem Like People want to Get to the Bottom of It Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify in the J6 Committee Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was told by Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was OFF LIMITS for Inquiry into January 6 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - It Sounds like a Set-Up! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Three More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They didn’t tell the Capitol Police Chief Antifa was in the crowds • Nancy Pelosi’s Operative, Yogananda Pittman • The White House Attack Compared to the January 6 Attack- They Didn’t Protect the White House CLIP 1 January 6 - The Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Tucker: Original reports were there were no agents in the crowd. We’ve learned there were in fact a lot of agents in the crowd. DID YOU KNOW? Steve Sund: No!… Shortly after January 6…> and I get a call from overseas & it was Great Britain Press, asking me about Feds in the crowd… I was like no, I would have been told, I’ve got lots of friends with the bureau, they all have my cell phone number, they would have told me..“ Your “friends” didn’t tell you Steve. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36k6if-january-6-the-capital-police-chief-was-not-informed-there-were-federal-agen.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative who was Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” 👀 “The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the Capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on National TV, blames leadership at the top, calls for my resignation & then lies about me. The very next day, Yogananda Pittman, is placed as Acting Chief. Yogananda Pittman was the head of intelligence for the Capital Police, thus she would have been responsible for an “intelligence failure”. She ended up getting a vote of NO CONFIDENCE from the Police Officers, and ended up being rewarded with the position as Chief of Police for the University of California Berkeley, which is right across from Nancy Pelosi’s district. How much does a Chief of Police make in Berkeley, CA? The average Chief of Police salary in Berkeley, CA is $143,200 as of July 25, 2023. The Chief of Police, Tom Manger, was asked about her position & he said Pittman was given some type of a “Secret Leave” so that she could leave & start her job on February 1st at Berkeley and not retire from the Capital Police four months later.” This Video https://rumble.com/v36l29u-january-6-yogananda-pittman-nancy-pelosis-operative-rewarded-with-a-cushy-j.html CLIP 3 January 6 - DC Police were Prevented from Protecting the White House & More Officers were Injured During that Attack then there were on January 6 - Charges Dropped against ALL those who Attacked the White House “The agency formed by Congress specifically for the US President, the Washington DC Police Department, when the White House was under attack and they are prevented from going on White House grounds to help the Secret Service to defend the White House!” 🤯 More officers were also injured in the Attack on the White House than there were at January 6. “I’m told by Park Police that all charges were dropped!” On those who attacked the White House. TREASON! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36lteo-january-6-steve-sund-the-white-house-under-attack-was-not-stopped-and-more-.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a debate about the presence of federal agents at the January 6 event. Initially, it was denied, but now it is confirmed that there were indeed federal agents in the crowd. It is not uncommon for federal agencies to have people in plain clothes for situational awareness at large events like demonstrations and inaugurations. The FBI took overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6 event. A GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 18 or 19 domestic terrorists planning to attend the event. It is concerning that this information was not shared with intelligence. It is important to deconflict and communicate with the Chief of Capitol Police to avoid any confusion or conflicts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the aftermath of January 6, there's been a huge debate over to what extent, you know, there were federal agents or people who are working in some way for federal agencies in the crowd. And the initial explanation was, well, none, and you're insane if you think that you're Alex Jones, you're crazy. And then over the last couple of years, we've seen people confirm, people in authority confirm actually, yeah, there were a lot in the crowd that day. I mean, that's now a fact. Did you know that going in? Speaker 1: No. They Speaker 0: were no. So just for perspective, since you've been to a lot of these events, there's a huge a planned demonstration in Washington, D. C. Will there always be assets, agents, people working for federal agencies in the crowd and civilian close? Speaker 1: There always could be. And for like inaugurations, There would usually be some combined teams out there, one for communications but just for situational awareness. So It wouldn't be surprising, 4th July, different things like that where you have threat pictures or concerning threat pictures. Speaker 0: And what does that look like? Does that mean, FBI agents dressed in dockers and tennis shoes trying to Speaker 1: Well, just be plain clothes, plain clothes to blend in. So that wouldn't be unusual and it'd be, you know, just standard police work. That'd be a good police work. So coming into January 6, and and and I talk about it in the book with The fact that shortly after January 6, I'm driving through Loudoun County. I'm coming I actually just talked to somebody from the Hill, and I get a call from overseas and it say it's press. I don't remember which what it was. It's somebody from, Great Britain. And they started asking me about feds in the crowd. I was like, no. No. I would have been told. So now we're getting word that there is feds in the crowd. I said, no. They I would have been told. I've got lots of friends with the, with the bureau. They all have my cell number they they would have told me. You know, think about that. And Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021 where she said they were taking over action To keep certain people from coming to January 6th to to watch DC. That's that's big for c for FBI to start taking overt action. I mean, that's not covert, over. That's a big that's a big deal. Fast forward to February of this year 2023 and the GAO report that says, on January 4 January 3rd, the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists that we're talking about coming to Washington DC, the Washington field office, their AOR, area of responsibility. By January 6, they were tracking 18 or 19 in the GAO report. Domestic terrorists. So think about that. They have 18 or 19 domestic terrorists coming to this event, So of course, they're going to have resources on them. And then you're not going to be just putting 1 agent, you're going to have multiples. So it would be multiple with that. And I don't know how many they actually had in there. So That would be regular standard police works. I would be surprised by it. But not to share that in the intelligence? That's concerning. Speaker 0: So I mean, it seems like common sense suggests anyway that you would have to tell the Chief of Capitol Police that, hey, we've got our guys in the crowd. Like just because, I mean, you would want to know the difference, correct? Speaker 1: You would absolutely want to know the difference and deconfliction. Want to have things like that. A lot of the folks will already know there's a lot of standard procedures for way to deconflict, so you don't have blue on blue type of situations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yogananda Pittman, the former Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security of the Capitol Police, was appointed as acting chief after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. However, there were concerns about an intelligence failure and her role in it. She later became the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, which raised questions about a potential reward. It was revealed that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by the Capitol Police. Whistleblowers within the intelligence unit had raised concerns and faced punishment. This situation appears suspicious and raises doubts about the integrity of the process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's Yogananda Pittman? Yogananda Pittman was Speaker 1: my Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security. Speaker 0: Okay. So, did she have the intelligence that you didn't have? Speaker 1: I I don't know. Speaker 0: What do you mean you don't know? Speaker 1: I I I don't know. I you don't know what you don't know. I don't know what she had and what she didn't have, but I do know that when you look at it and we immediately knew, I mean, anybody immediately knew. One of the first things you start to think about is this an intelligence failure. So think about it. We go through January 6. I was begging for the National Guard, refused before, Fused during it. We get the capital under control. You know, I get them to where they can go back into session, 7:30. They elect to go in at 8 and then the house goes at 9. But nonetheless so think about this. The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the of the capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on national TV, Blames leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV, and then lies about me. Okay? The very next day the very next day puts Yogananda Pittman as acting chief. Speaker 0: But Yogananda Pittman, You just described her as the head of intelligence for Capitol Police. Correct. So if there was an intelligence failure, Which again doesn't seem like a failure. It seems very intentional to me. But if there was such a failure, she'd be responsible, Correct? Or she'd be in the chain of responsibility anyway? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, she was she was the head of intelligence. So if there's intelligence failure, see, my thing is Do a proper analysis. You know? You know, why do a knee jerk reaction? I mean, putting her in charge, I mean, she ended up getting a a vote of no confidence. So she didn't get the position from the from the police officers because many were upset with what happened. So she Speaker 0: Where where did she wind up? Speaker 1: Where is she now? Yeah. She's chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley. Interesting. Speaker 0: So right across from Nancy Pelosi's district? Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: In the Bay Area. Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: So you just kind of take the Bay Bridge over there and that's where she is now. What does that position pay, do you know? Speaker 1: I think it pays pretty well. There was a Pays extraordinarily well. I'm sure it pays pretty good. It's interesting, there was a hearing just recently that was on it's on TV. You can look at it, where the chief of police, Tom Manger, was asked about Her position, it turns out that she was given some type of a secret leave. So she'd leave, start her job on February 1st as the chief of police, and not retire from the capital police for months later. Speaker 0: Oh, so you should get the benefits. Speaker 1: Yeah. Think about that. Yeah. It appears to be against departmental policy, And nobody originally was told. Speaker 0: What you're saying is that the head of intelligence for the Capitol Police, which Demonstrably didn't have the intelligence that needed to protect the building. That person was first elevated to acting chief Of Capitol Police and then given a very high paying job right across Nancy Pelosi's district at the University of California, Berkeley. Speaker 1: That is correct. And I will say that So Speaker 0: that looks like a reward to me. Speaker 1: Well, I do know that the unit had significant intelligence, and I know many people within the unit were pushing that intelligence up to the to the leadership of the unit. So I do I do know that. Many of them became whistle blowers, and many of them were punished and forced to resign. Yep. Speaker 0: This looks like a scam. I
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack on the White House. They mention the fire at Saint John's Church and the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House. They question who made the decision to prevent the police from defending the White House and highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied. The speaker also mentions that more officers were injured during the riots than on January 6th. They speculate on how things would have been different if Barack Obama had been president. Overall, they find the situation concerning and suggest that Trump may be a key factor in all of this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many things that that are in here. I talk about the 2020 riots versus the 20 the the January 6 attack. Speaker 1: The riots in front of the White House were famously Saint John's Church was set on fire. Speaker 0: White House, across the country. You know, I talk about the White House, and I talk about an agency that was formed by congress Specifically for the protection of the United States president, the Washington DC Police Department. The White House is under attack, and they are prevented. They are prevented. I know it's not from chief Newsom. It's from his you know, he was the chief at the time. Would have been from, above him. They're from prevented from going on cap on White House grounds and helping the United States seek its service from defending the the White House. So think about that. Church. You know, who made that decision? Again, all I know is, you know, Nutrien's hands were tied. So Mayor Bowser, Higher? I don't know. But think about that. Speaker 1: Somebody told when there and there was real rioting. In fact, I think Oh. That more officers were injured Hit that riot. Then were injured on January 6th, I think. Speaker 0: Yep. Yep. Again, don't take my word. Jail report. More officers injured at the Protest by the White House and on January 6th. And I'm told by Park Police, all charges were dropped According to the, the, fighting at Lafayette Park and at the, at the White House. There were secret service agents bloodied and battered over there. There was a number of federal agencies that were hurt. Structure set on fire. They tried to light the Hay Adams Hotel on fire that was occupied. Think about that. Charges dropped. No no such situation. I mean, when you look at the disparity of how justice is being applied, again, that's that's scary. That becomes really scary when, it becomes politicized like that. And that's what appears to have happened. Speaker 1: I mean, it sounds like Trump is the key to all of this. If Trump hadn't been the president, things would have been very responses would have been very different, don't you think? I mean, if Barack Obama had been president, do you think that someone would have told MPD that Washington D. C. Police Department, they couldn't protect the White House? Speaker 0: Again, I don't I I protect the White House. I don't I see what you're saying there. I I don't know. I mean, I think not. Speaker 1: Like, I mean, it's a hypothetical. I I shouldn't ask you to answer hypothetical questions, but it does seem seems amazing.
January 6 - The Capital Police Chief was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - The White House Under Attack was not Stopped & More Officers Injured Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

This is a meeting just before January 6, where BLM Leader(s) Government Workers, Media Leaks, were Conspiring against the US Government, & planning the REAL Insurrection, including violence & breaking windows. As you heard in the above statements from the Capitol Police Chief, Antifa was there and he was not briefed of their presence. Why wouldn’t the Capitol Police Chief be briefed of this? https://rumble.com/v2478bm-january-6-meeting-exposed-blm-government-workers-media-leaks-breaking-windo.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Shut It Down DC discusses their plans for responding to a potential coup and contested election scenarios. They emphasize the need to take action in the streets and disrupt business as usual in Congress. There is talk of revolution and potential violence, with some suggesting breaking windows to enter government buildings. Leaking information to journalists and creating parallel structures are mentioned as tactics. Federal workers are encouraged to engage in noncooperation to undermine those in power. The importance of communication with grassroots groups and sustained organizing is highlighted. Practical examples of slowing down processes and exposing wrongdoing are shared. Overall, the focus is on taking decisive action to resist a potential coup.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really wanna hear from, Shut It Down DC about this. Do you do we have any plans for how to respond if there's a coup? Speaker 1: Yeah. We, have been in discussion for a couple months About, how to respond to different contested election scenarios. 1st step is that we we think that we need to start the The post election phase in the streets. Congress is planning on coming to town and passing laws again and, like, having business as usual, and we're saying there's If if we're in a coup, there's no time for business as usual. Speaker 0: I heard someone in the chat talking about revolution time, and so I encourage, You know, for all of us to be fighting for revolution before today, today, tomorrow, afterwards. Speaker 2: We're facing an administration and a potential coup and a Potential insurrection where, efforts to criminalize this are going to be even greater. Understanding that everything that we're doing now in this moment is laying the groundwork for what is going to come. Is there going to be a war? Are people gonna get killed? Like, is that on anybody else's mind? I'm guessing it is. We're gonna see potential fighting all over the country or in some hot spots. We might need to think about that. And I know as I you know, I said earlier how, you know, we may find ourselves in the streets with people with different tactics than ours. But, like, there may be some people that are willing to break the windows to get into the government buildings. Like, If that's what we need to do, then we shouldn't fight about that. Let's do that. Let's take over the buildings. Speaker 3: Text them, leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me To be the source of the leaks. Speaker 4: Groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers. Making sure that we're naming What is happening is a coup. Speaker 5: Totally agreed. In the subbound BP conversations that I've been having that's not on the federal side, we, also are often Call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not. Speaker 4: President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, But when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that we all as ordinary people, and as federal workers have power? If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up. They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, at the top of the bureaucratic totem pole, need. It ultimately comes down to individual decisions and personal choice. Deciding what to do or what not to do is a very personal decision. It's based on context. It's based on your rank, on your tolerance for risk, on your preparation and frankly where you sit in the federal, federal bureaucracy. We're talking about the range of different tactics. We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission. And another act of commission, albeit Highly, you know, risky, and there are a number of, great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. So another act of, Of commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace. Speaker 6: As an attorney in the federal government, I I am finding the chat suggestions very interesting, and I just do wanna remind people that we lose our status as federal employees if we strike. Speaker 7: And there's been a little conversation going on here, for example, about Black Lives Matter and how that is an example of a nonpartisan political statement. Guess that's been previously litigated, but whether or not you do a misdemeanor or an infraction on federal property or on public property, really doesn't affect, most of the jobs, that you would be considered for. Speaker 6: Yeah. As an attorney, I think I'm We we're highly, you know, that's one of the things we have to be careful about. Speaker 4: I would just say this is also the importance of being in communication with and in touch With groups, civic groups, grassroots groups that are preparing people for the possibility that red lines may be crossed, that, You know, there that the election goes sideways, you know, so everything from choose democracy to hold the line, to To shut down, we count on us. I listed a few of those in the slides earlier, but they're the ones who are really in the vanguard of Helping people think about, interpret red lines, and think about different actions that can be taken well beyond kind of street protests and demonstrations, but kind of Sustained organizing an action. Speaker 7: What does it look like in practical terms to put you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another? Speaker 6: At the Department of Labor, it it takes the form of, several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation. And when, When the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the data labor report, and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson, and the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So, again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's it's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then congress getting the office of inspector general involved. It's it was really a way to Stop that thing just in its tracks, and it it worked really well.
January 6 Meeting Exposed: BLM, Government Workers, Media Leaks, Breaking Windows- They we’re Planning the REAL Insurrection! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth My Website— www.theunshakeablepundit.com rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

We know Antifa was involved and was there according to Attorney Joeseph McBride uncovering A 96-Page DC Police Report which showed the Government Knew Antifa was coming https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H3mHiUZCz9jyfDFTTpYw7VuYCgMtuLWW/view Not only that, this report shows they were anticipating violence and still, Nancy Pelosi denied Trumps request to provide the National Guard. Here is the US Capitol Police CDU Operations Plan for J6 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yfivz5NdQa90gVXoC1nKNN_1zsDK4J1V/view Here are Several Documented Instances CLIP 1 A Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him This person was never charged. Why? This Video https://rumble.com/v2ceie4-january-6-masked-man-with-earpiece-caught-tearing-up-capital-building-windo.html CLIP 2 January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfl9k-january-6-antifa-identified-and-forced-from-the-steps-at-capital-building.html CLIP 3 January 6: Two Camera Angles of Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfoxs-january-6-antifa-breaking-capital-windows-while-trump-supporters-stop-them-.html

January 6: Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

CLIP 1 Here is a DC Officer admitting they were also undercover as Antifa in the crowd. “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” This Video https://rumble.com/v35qnwc-january-6-dc-officer-we-go-undercover-as-antifa-in-the-crowd.html CLIP 2 One of the more concerning things to come out of the Jan 6 Report, or should I say did not come out, was the fact they Hid Any Mention of the Pipe Bomber, who was specifically responsible for Shutting Down Congress That Day This video is proof that the FBI lied and this is a coverup. The average rate of a CCT camera in America is 15 fps (Frames per Seccond). The video the FBI released to the public was 1 fps. You read that right. ☝️ The average gas station camera is 15 fps, which would make the camera(s) at the DNC fifteen times worse…. Than a gas station. Who was it? Antifa? FBI? If it was a Trump supporter they would have been front page news. The FBI are able to track down peaceful protesters across the US but not a suspect planting bombs? This video https://rumble.com/v228q0m-fbi-releases-impossible-1-fps-video-of-the-dc-pipe-bomber-impeach-merrick-g.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
FBI agents are seeking tips to identify the suspect who planted bombs near the Democratic National Party headquarters. Videos show the suspect sitting on a park bench before one of the bombs was placed. The frame rate of CCTV cameras is typically around 15 frames per second (FPS). However, the security video released by the FBI of the January 6th pipe bomb suspect shows only 1 FPS, which is highly unlikely for unaltered footage. The DNC has a history of security concerns, including the Watergate scandal, and the use of 1 FPS footage is statistically improbable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lester, FBI agents say they have no idea who planted the bombs, and they hope these new videos will generate some valuable tips. 1 shows the suspect walking up and sitting on a park bench near the Democratic National Party headquarters. 1 of the bombs was later planted in this same area. Speaker 1: Frames per second, like its name implies, is the number of a Individual images or frames, the system captures every second. The average industry frame rate of most CCTV cameras is around 15 frames a per second. Speaker 2: We also recommend using a minimum of 15 FPS or frames per second. Speaker 0: Now here at Proactive Security, we recommend actually 15 frames per second. Speaker 2: What you're looking at is the actual frame speed of the security video the FBI released to the public of the January 6th pipe bomb Suspect. It's just 1 frame per second. You're going to learn now why that is virtually impossible unless this tape is not the original source footage. A comprehensive study in 2021 by one of the world's leading authorities on security cameras found that 0% of cameras in fuse in America today operated at just 1 frame per second. Statistically speaking, the odds that the video the FBI a Police to the public was unaltered is less than 1%. The average gas station in America uses 15 frames per second. That make the DNC national headquarters 15 times worse than the average gas station. A Meanwhile, we know the DNC cares so much about security at this area that for years, they have stationed a physical guard during a during the daytime right at this site. And that makes sense. It was the break in of the DNC national headquarters 50 years ago that Pause the largest scandal in American history, Watergate. Between the history of attacks on the DNC building, plus the fact that DC was once the murder capital of the country plus the fact that 0% of cameras in use today use one frame per second. It is virtually impossible the tape the FBI released was the actual unedited footage.
January 6 - DC Officer “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
FBI Releases Impossible 1 FPS Video of the DC “Pipe Bomber”- Impeach Merrick Garland Now! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

We also now know there was an FBI presence on January 6— Hundreds of agents in the crowd when at first they said there was little to no FBI presence How many of these agents played a role in instigating or steering violence? It was later discovered that Internal FBI Communications in the United States v Ethan Nordean case revealed the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were Found to be DESTROYING EVIDENCE! This not only proves the FBI lied on the stand, but there were criminal informants involved who sought to have their records altered to conceal their involvement! This may be a Brady violation! Brady Disclosure: “The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant.” This Video https://rumble.com/v2cj02o-january-6-internal-fbi-communications-reveal-the-fbi-demanded-the-removal-o.html United States https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23699546-nordean-filing-on-fbi-testimony In addition, a motion filed by a J6’er Pezzola’s attorney, Roger Root, the FBI Admitted to having 40 Undercover Agents (that we know of) Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 The DOJ admitted that of the 13 Proud Boys involved with J6, eight or more of them were paid by the FBI to provide the government information about the group. The Proud Boys were outnumbered 10-1 by undercover gov’t agents and informants at the Capitol Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection

Video Transcript AI Summary
New information has emerged regarding internal FBI messages related to January 6th. The messages reveal a demand to edit confidential human source reports and remove agent participation. In a recent court filing, it was disclosed that FBI special agent Nicole Miller compiled her messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was produced to the US attorney's office. However, a closer examination of the spreadsheet uncovered over 1,000 hidden rows of messages. The documents also show an agent requesting Miller to edit out their presence in a CHS informant report. Additionally, there is mention of an FBI boss assigning the destruction of 338 items of evidence. These revelations suggest that the FBI was present during the January 6th events, infiltrating groups and inciting violence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New bombshell information coming out in regards to the internal FBI messages surrounding January 6th, demanding confidential human source reports be edited to remove agent participation. In the Nordean filing on FBI testimony, case number 121cr00 175tjk, document number 678, filed on March 9th 2023, United States of America versus Ethan Nordian as the defendant. Hu Nordean's notice of argument in support of impeachment of witness with hidden Jenks related communications. Today, government witness special agent Nicole Miller was cross examined. She testified that she understood her legal duty under the Jenks act to produce the US attorney's office written statements relating to the subject matter of her testimony. Miller acknowledged that among those statements were messages to be sent in the FBI's link messaging system where bureau employees communicate with one another. She testified that in order to comply with her Jinx obligations, he compiled her links messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was then produced to the USAO. The version of Miller's Excel sheet produced to the defense contained 25 rows of her linked messages. In cross examination, the agent acknowledged she compiled that disclosure. She testified that those messages constituted a complete production of her Jinx statements from links. However, a close examination of the agent's sheet revealed over 1,000 hidden Excel rows of messages. Further on into the documents reveal an agent's request to special agent Miller to go into a CHS informant report that Miller just put together and edit out the agent was present. Quote, you need to go into that CHS report you just put and edit out that I was present, end quote. Hu- further along in these documents reveal that Miller's communication with another agent who states that the agent's FBI boss assigned her 338 items of evidence I have to destroy. So not only have we learned that the F. Was in fact there for the January 6th events. We also learned that through Ray Epps and other evidence that they were in fact embedded inside the crowd. They acted as Trump supporters. They infiltrated groups and invoked violence. Hue, and now we are learning that they are destroying evidence.
January 6 Bombshell! Internal FBI Communications Reveal the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were DESTROYING EVIDENCE! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
Nordean Filing on FBI Testimony documentcloud.org
SHOCKING UPDATE: FBI Now Admits to 40 Undercover Agents Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 #Fedsurrection | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft Federal operative takes down fencing on January 6 before Trump supporters arrived in mass at the US Capitol. thegatewaypundit.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

What role did Ray Epps play? For who? What agency? The FBI seems most logical because The FBI only removed 3 people from the Most Wanted list, one of them being Ray Epps. And it appears they were doing everything they can to cover for him. CLIP 1 New Footage of Ray Epps appeared out of the 14,000 hours of hidden footage. In a nutshell, the first video is what was played in the courtroom, in the Proud Boys trial. The video shows a “GLITCH” on the feed, at a specific point in time. The second ORIGINAL video, clearly shows no distortion but shows Ray Epps entering the scene and makes the first breach through a black fence with an army of all black dressed supposed “MAGA supporters”. They doctored the video to be presented in court! Clear tampering of evidence! CLIP 2 Tucker Carlson uncovered a New Video that exposed Ray Epps for committing PERJURY. https://rumble.com/v2c179s-january-6-new-video-exposes-ray-epps-for-perjury.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, the role of intelligence and law enforcement agencies during the Capitol events remains a mystery. It is known that there were undercover federal agents present, but their purpose is unclear. Ray Epps, a figure seen encouraging the crowd to enter the Capitol, has not been indicted for his actions. Despite admitting to orchestrating the protests and helping people get there, Epps claimed he never entered the Capitol. However, surveillance footage contradicts his testimony, showing him remaining at the Capitol for at least another half hour. The January 6th committee likely knew about this, yet defended Epps. The reasons for Epps' actions and the committee's defense remain unknown.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the enduring mysteries of January 6th is the role that intelligence and law enforcement agencies played in the events of that day. We know there was some number of undercover federal agents in the crowd at the Capitol. Officials have since admitted that under oath. But what exactly were they doing there? The January 6th committee worked hard are to hide the answer to that question. We do know from contemporaneous video tape that a mysterious figure called Ray Epps encouraged the crowd should go into the capital. For some reason, Epps has never been indicted for that, but there's no question he didn't. We need to go into the capital. Were at all. Under public pressure, the January 6th committee finally interviewed Ray Epps. Epps told the committee that he never entered the capital and therefore never committed a crime. His text messages showed that at 2:12 PM, he boasted to his nephew view that he had, quote, orchestrated the protests at the Capitol. He admitted he helped get people there. Yet, curiously, congressional Democrats consider Ray Epps an ally, not an insurrectionist. Tonight, we can tell you that at the very least, Ray Epps lied in his sworn testimony to the January 6th committee, Epps testified that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he he'd already left the capitol grounds to return to his hotel room. That is not true. The surveillance footage we found shows that in fact, Ray Epps remained at the capitol for at least another half an hour. You're seeing that on your screen now. What was Epps doing there? We can't say, but we do know that he lied had 2 investigators. The January 6th committee likely knew this too. Democrats had access to the same tape, yet they defended Ray Epps. No investigation would do that.
January 6: New Video exposes Ray Epps for PERJURY and Lied to Investigators! rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

🚨 Ray Epps Adopted Daughter was interviewed by @dom_lucre & she tells quite a sick disturbing story into who Ray Epps is… MY NOTES: (TSTM= Twitter Space Time Mark) In this clip, at the 1:28:00 TSTM, she claims Ray Epps forced her to strip naked while she was on her period at 14 years old, & forced her to sleep outside in the cold, and she had to sleep with the dog to get warm. 59:20 TSTM- Dom confirms in a Twitter post she is who she says she is via adoption papers, brith certificate, & photos 45:45 TSTM- She underwent 6 name changes indicating she may have been kidnapped 47:45 TSTM- She was photographed naked “scouted from a modeling agency” 1:00:00 TSTM- Ray was a high ranking LDS priesthood holder 1:12:30 TSTM- Rays nickname was sniper on the roof 1:20:15 TSTM- J6’er George Tanios spoke to her This Clip https://rumble.com/v2keb8w-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-talks-about-having-to-strip-and-sleep-o.html Full Discussion https://rumble.com/v2ke1xa-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-on-her-being-abused-and-molested.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares a disturbing experience involving Robyn and Ray. Robyn would sometimes be incoherent due to medication. The speaker recalls two specific incidents. In one, Ray made the speaker strip in front of him while thinking Robyn was asleep. The speaker felt embarrassed and uncomfortable, especially since they were only 14 and hadn't started using tampons yet. Ray then made the speaker sleep outside, even though it was cold. The speaker had to snuggle up with their dog for warmth. Ray threatened the speaker, saying he would hunt them down if they tried to run away or seek help. The next day, the speaker was allowed back inside. The speaker also expresses their disdain for Robyn, calling them a piece of shit.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was always not always. It would be when Robyn was incoherent. She took medications. I don't know what they were at the time, but, she was like a zombie, and there was 1 there was 2 specific times that stick out to me one time, was when he was having me strip in front of him because he thought that Robin was in bed asleep, and 1 by 1, I had to take my clothing off, and I remember at that time, I'm, fuck. It's embarrassing. I hadn't started using tampons yet, I was 14, and I got to the point where it was just my panties, and he was sitting on the couch, and I remember looking at him, and he said, drop them, and I said, please don't make me do this. And, I had to. And then, he made me sleep outside, but before that happened, before I hold my panties down, you know, on my period, you know, do the math, Haben had walked out of the bedroom, and down the hall, she looked at me, and she looked at Ray, and looked back at me and shook her head, went back into her room and shut the door, and that's when I had to continue taking off my panties, and then he said, now you can sleep outside. And I had to sleep outside, and yes, we lived in Arizona, and I do not remember the month, but I remember being cold, and I remember having to snuggle up with my dog to keep me warm. And he said, if you try to run away, I will hunt you down, and I will find you. And if you try to call the police or tell anybody, just remember who are they gonna believe? Me or you? I'm an adult near a child, and so I stayed naked in my backyard with my dog all night, and then I was allowed in the next day. And Robin is just as big of a piece of shit, if not more, than he is,
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Talks About Having to Strip & Sleep Outside While on Her Period - Abuse She Suffered from Ray Epps Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Tells Horrific & Heartbreaking Story on Her Being Abused & Molested by Epps Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

January 6 Entrapment! The following footage was Obtained from the United States department of justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper West Terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. The video shows they were waved in by police. It is clear no violence or crime was committed by the people in this video. They were allowed in and are included in the video below. https://rumble.com/v1135ol-bombshell-january-6-entrapment-new-video-surfaces.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Surveillance footage from the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, shows police officers allowing protesters to exit through the Upper West Terrace doors. A man holding an American flag catches the door and waves to the crowd outside. Meanwhile, another man with a red cap approaches the interior doors and is let in by a police officer. A large group of protesters enters the Capitol through the doors, with police officers standing by and allowing them to pass. Around 250 protesters entered that day, many of whom are charged with felony obstruction. At one point, a police officer walks with the protesters, showing no signs of fear. Eventually, police stop the protesters briefly before allowing them to enter again. At 2:47 PM, the doors are closed and no more individuals enter.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following footage was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper west terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Just after 2:33 PM, police officers allow 5 individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 2:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 2:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 2:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors. They can see police officers standing at the interior doors, allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 2:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 2:36:54, Speaker 1: the police allowed the crowd to pass. At 2:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. Speaker 0: At 2:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. Speaker 1: At 2:44 pm, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. Speaker 0: At 2:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear closed the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individuals entered through the Upper West Terrace doors.
BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me on Truth Socia rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

More Proof it was a a SET UP. Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel At the 0:34 Mark Tactical Officer: “….Any identifiers?” USCP Officer: “They will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel. I don’t know the wristband color. They will have a wristband somewhere. OK?” https://rumble.com/v35s94o-january-6-undercover-feds-identifiers-theyll-have-a-wristband-or-candy-stri.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person describes a man wearing a black vest with a pink blue line and dark hair. They mention that he may be around 27 years old and has something on his hip. The speaker also mentions that there were too many people for the police to reach. They describe another person as a white male with dark hair. The speaker then talks about the appearance of the uniformed officers, mentioning that they may have a wristband and a stripe on their gun barrel. However, they are unsure of the color of the wristband.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys are here. Black vest. Pink blue line. Thing on, dark hair. And he's kinda like a lookin' like a 27 or something on his hip. No police identity came couldn't get to them because there were so many people. 5 piece of white mix on white male. White male, dark hair. Yeah. Yeah. Alright. Looks like grayish black, maybe maybe a, digital gun. Uniform guys have any identifiers like, they will have a wristband. Their guns will have a handy stripe on the barrel. Okay. I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband line, somewhere.
January 6 - Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Truth_InMedia
Posted - November 3, 2023 at 5:03 PM
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 7:35 PM

@Truth_InMedia - Truth In Media

Why was Ray Epps treated as victim by the same people who condemned almost everyone around him as a threat? We try to answer some lingering questions about the one "election-denying-Donald Trump-supporter" the media and the government didn't seem to hate. https://t.co/1u5dXtSGLv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video explores the question of whether undercover agents or assets for the federal government played a role in instigating the events of January 6th. It focuses on Ray Epps, a man who has been accused of being a government informant and encouraging violence at the Capitol. The video presents evidence from various sources, including livestream footage, suggesting that Epps may have been acting suspiciously and repeating certain phrases to manipulate the crowd. However, it also acknowledges that there is no concrete proof of Epps' involvement as a confidential source. The lack of attention given to this story in the past is also highlighted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For more than two and a half years, Americans tied to January 6th have been vilified as insurrectionists, but charged and often imprisoned for mostly misdemeanor trespassing offenses. And there's 1 unanswered question That threatens the insurrection narrative more than any other. Did undercover agents or assets for the federal government Agitate people to go into the capital and encourage or incite violence. In short, was January 6th a kind of setup More of a fedsurrection than an insurrection. The FBI alone had so many informants, Steven D'Antuono, A senior leader in the Washington field office at the time admitted in sworn testimony that they lost track And ordered an audit to account for all of them. We still don't know exactly what those undercover assets were doing, Whether their actions were legal or not, we don't even know exactly how many government agencies were involved. But we do know that protesters themselves quickly recognized there were provocateurs in their midst and called some of them out. One of them was a man named Ray Epps, who rightly or wrongly has become the face of the alleged Fed's erection. Epps has repeatedly denied working for any government agency and has gone so far as to sue some of his accusers. So we decided to take a closer look, and what we found may surprise you. It was a moment that will live in infamy. At an infomerulus stop the seal rally in Washington DC on the eve of January 6th when people in the crowd turned on a 58 year old man With a lot to say, that man was Ray Epps. Speaker 1: So I'm gonna put it out there. Speaker 2: I'm probably gonna go to jail Speaker 1: for a day. Tomorrow, we need to go Into the capital. Into the capital. What? No. No. No. Peacefully. Dead. Speaker 0: There it was Before a single protester ever set foot inside the capital, some of them suspected they were being set up. Take me back to that moment. Take me back to the moment when you looked at Ray Epps And the thought came into your head, and you said Fed. Fed. Speaker 1: Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Speaker 3: When I first saw Ray Epps, He came up to me. This is January 5th. We're outside BLM Plaza. We're protesting. The police are protecting Antifa. And the last few years, that's been a common theme here is that the left, You know, BLM can burn down cities for 6 months. Antifa can attack people. The cops do nothing. And then, you know, you do a little joke on your live stream and And you're this domestic terrorist all of a sudden. Speaker 0: His real name is Tim Gurney, but he goes by baked Alaska, what he called his stage name. Your stage name. Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 0: That makes you sound like a stripper. Speaker 3: No. I'm not a stripper. It's my, my rapper name. My entertainment name, I guess. Speaker 0: The controversial 35 year old e celebrity from Anchorage has made a career out of social media that's lasted more than a decade Despite being banned from one platform after another. For a while, he was associated with the alt right, which he told us he regretted and said he since cut ties. He's gathered thousands of followers with his confrontational style and no shortage of haters. Speaker 1: Get out of my door now. A cringe lord, a poser, and a white trash provocateur. Speaker 0: He's often spudded in the land of memes. Speaker 1: Can I take your order? Dude, let's go. I got ketchup mixed with last year. Speaker 0: And landed a shoutout from Joe Rogan himself On the world's most popular podcast Speaker 1: this Baked Alaska guy who's, like, a famous shit poster. Do you know what shit posters? They say, like, ridiculous And their memes, and they fuck with people, and they get people upset. Yeah. It's pretty funny stuff. Speaker 0: Great. Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 1: I'm so honored to live in a country where our president is shit posting on Twitter. It really makes the world a better place. Oh, Speaker 0: that's hilarious. Speaker 1: We are in Washington DC, boys. Speaker 0: Fans across The country were watching his livestream that freezing winter night as lines of police separated the crowd of Trump supporters From a small number of antifa agitators in a fairly tense standoff, we learned that Raebbs talked to Bayt Alaska about going into the capital Twice. Two conversations roughly 10 minutes apart. This is what he said happened the first time, shortly after 10:30 PM. Speaker 3: Ray Epps came up to me and started saying, we need to go into the capital. Now I'm someone who creates funny content and I just Like to agree with everyone, and you know, if someone's saying something crazy, a lot of times I'll just agree. Be like, yeah. Yeah. Because I, You as an interviewer understand you want to allow them to continue speaking. So the 1st time he says this, and I'm like, let's Go, which is a phrase that I say all the time. I'm sorta just encouraging him. I'm like, that's some crazy boomer. Okay. He's he's saying some stuff. Speaker 0: Here, you can see it for yourself. Speaker 1: In fact, tomorrow, Speaker 4: I don't even like to say Speaker 1: it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in to the capital. Let's go. Speaker 0: What stood out in this first exchange, the way Epps Stopped and paused after he said in. Speaker 1: We need to go in to the capital. Speaker 0: Big Alaska's reaction said it all. Speaker 1: I didn't see that coming up. And he was like, don't beat that guy up, but let's go into the castle. Speaker 3: And then I get weirded out. So I'm I move to a different group. I'm like and and everyone around is, like, what is this guy saying? Speaker 0: And And you're filming at this point? Speaker 1: I'm Speaker 3: filming live the whole time. Yeah. So you're seeing this unfold in real time, then I'm just Saying let's go. Alright. Thank you. Thank you. I'm like, I'm getting away from this creep. He's he's weirding me out. I'm getting weird vibes. Something's off. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 3: I go to another group way far away from him. He follows me, and then he starts instructing the crowd, and that's That's the famous moment. He says, we need to go into the capital. Speaker 1: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Marino. Into the capital. Speaker 3: Right when he said that, something clicked into my head. I was like, woah. This is scripted. Because he said the same exact line word for word. Speaker 0: And that's Speaker 3: It's not natural. And I've been doing this for about 10 years. I go to every single type of rally, film, and not just Film clips. No. I live stream for extended periods of time. So I'm able to see, I guess, the micro dynamics of how, the crowds Act and respond to things, and, you know, what are natural statements. And so I was also tipped off by, why is he going around to all the groups Instructing them what to do, and he was he kept saying, none of this matters. Tomorrow, we need to go in to the capital. Maybe the 1st time he's being silly or saying something crazy, but when he said it the 3rd time word for word, I knew there's a strong possibility this guy's a fed. I started that chant, and guess what? The whole crowd joined in with me within seconds. Speaker 1: Then. Then. Speaker 3: And that wasn't planned or coordinated. That was just the spirit moving. That was God saying, There's something up here. Like, we watch out. There's something going on. And and that's what I felt in my heart as a believer, Truly. Speaker 0: To be clear, because it's very difficult to prove these things Speaker 3: Right. Speaker 0: Nobody is saying for certain, Ray Epps is A confidential source. He, of course, denies it. Speaker 3: Right. Speaker 0: And his attorney denies it. He's taken legal action against people who say it, and he has many cheerleaders Yeah. In the media. Speaker 3: Yeah. The New York Times, the January 6th commission, Liz Cheney. Speaker 0: 60 Minutes. Speaker 3: 60 Minutes. Once again, like, yes, that's my opinion. I believe he is a fed Okay. Speaker 0: Well, Speaker 3: that's my information, but I can't say a 100%. Speaker 0: Beg Telaska agreed. Opinion was not evidence. And we reminded him Reaaps also denied working for the government When he testified under oath before the January 6th committee, since his defamation attorney, Michael Teter, The FBI, the Department of Justice, and Epps all declined to comment. We turned to firsthand original recordings From multiple sources, control through every frame we could find. Metadata from the live stream showed that from the start of his first encounter with Big Until they parted ways. A period of 1 hour 32 minutes and 39 seconds, Epps repeated certain phrases Over and over, he told them at least 12 times what he wanted them to focus on. Speaker 1: We are here to do something. Speaker 0: Our whole lives matter. Speaker 1: It is not Something To mess with Antifa, it is not to mess with Black Lives Matter. That doesn't matter. Keep your focus. Keep focus. Keep your focus. You're losing focus. Don't lose focus. I have been losing focus. You're losing focus. Keep the focus, guys. Speaker 5: You're not here for this garbage. Speaker 0: And said around 6 times, this is not why we are here. Speaker 1: Stop it. Not what we're here for. Yes. It is. Yes. It is. Not what we're here for. Why you want to talk to me? Don't. But that's not why we're here. Job. You let me talk to you. That's not why we're here. Let me getting off the subject, man. We're here for another reason. Speaker 0: So many times it drew this response from Baked Alaska. Speaker 1: You may be here for a reason, but other people might be. I Speaker 0: can tell the difference between a news story in propaganda because I've been a journalist for more than 35 years. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And in propaganda, they repeat themselves. Right. Speaker 1: You're Speaker 0: making a point because you want to focus people on that. When you tell a story Mhmm. You don't keep repeating yourself. Your audience isn't dumb. Yeah. And I saw this guy there, and I'm thinking, first of all, who are you? Mhmm. Why are you directing this? Speaker 3: Directing people around? Who does that? Speaker 0: Who gave you the authority? Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't Speaker 3: I don't go up to the crowds and say, do this, do that. We gotta no. Speaker 0: The immediate reaction was concerned. Speaker 1: What's the next shot? It's not gonna happen. Okay. Speaker 0: And Epps' insistence that Antifa and BLM don't matter. Speaker 1: It's not about them. That's the not about them. Speaker 0: Seemed to pour gas on the fire for people who had endured years of antagonism from Antifa's black bloc. Ever since Trump's victory in 2016, his supporters had been targeted by the so called brown shirts of the left who'd shown up at his rallies to start fights and more recently at stop the steel rallies in Washington DC in December Right after the 2020 election, when the violence and intimidation escalated. Antifa turned streets in the capital into no go areas for Trump supporters. Some pushed back in anger and at least 4 people were stabbed according to police. Speaker 1: We don't really know exactly what happened, but somebody came out of a doorway and stabbed one of our leaders. Speaker 0: Several protesters told us That's why many came prepared for the Trump rally on January 6th, swapping golf shoes and sneakers for combat boots and stab vests. Speaker 1: VLM and Antifa are burning down our cities and destroying our country. Matter right now. Yes. It does. That's making It does not matter right now. That's Speaker 0: Epstein on message And later told the January 6th committee he was trying to stop violence. Congressman Adam Kinzinger credited him for that, And we did find Epps inserting himself in a number of arguments. Speaker 1: I called you. They attacked you for what? It's all good, man. For bird Speaker 0: But the violence seemed to be over by then As confirmed by Baked Alaska and others who were present, Epps also told the committee he thought the capital would be open because it was a weekday. And although he said this twice. Speaker 4: I don't even like to say Speaker 1: it because I'll be arrested. So I'm gonna put it out there. Speaker 2: I'm probably gonna go to jail. Speaker 0: He testified he did not believe he would be arrested and was trying to find some common ground. Epps did have a number of supporters in the crowd. Speaker 1: My man. Jack. My man. Jack. He's right. He's right. I'm not here right now. From what I've heard so far, I We're not gonna win. Speaker 0: But with Big Tallaska, It got a little heated. Speaker 1: Shut up. Get out of get out of here. Get out of here. I I'm done with you. I'm done talking to you. Punked the one. I'm I'm no. Get out get out of here. Yeah. You realize how when he gets proven wrong, he just makes shit up because, oh, you guys are trying to cause violence. Speaker 0: And a little personal. Speaker 1: The media calls us Nazis, you fucking retard. Are you serious? Don't argue with him. He's making money on you. That's what this is. You said. About The money. Oh. It's all about the money. Speaker 0: Baked was still convinced Epps was working an angle. Speaker 1: No. No. He he's definitely a plan. Okay. 100%. That's better. I'm telling you, Any sort of interaction we have, this this fucking guy comes in. He's, like, and has some fucking thing to say We're the only one. To buy this. Speaker 0: Then when things were dying down, Shortly before midnight, we discovered another conversation we hadn't seen or heard before. Here, Epps took a different tone with Baked Alaska. Speaker 1: I despise. I despise the enemy. There we go. The old There we go. I despise the anti I'm myself. With the army then. I respect that. Queen Creek, Arizona. That's right. That's where I live. Are you my neighbor? I swear. You know how that I live in Queen Creek. I'm gonna I choked you, man. Wait. This guy You antagonize with me, man? Or maybe it's because you're my neighbor. What do you mean? Speaker 0: Then he leaned in and whispered something he apparently Did not want to say out loud. Speaker 1: We're not here to fight, man. We're here to I'm not kidding My kitty We're here to serve the capital. Hell, yeah. Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe, boy. Job. Be safe, brother. Speaker 0: That one moment changed what we knew about Raheps that night When he whispered, storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Speaker 3: Of supporters of president Trump stormed the US Capitol building. Thousands storming the Capitol. This mob that stormed the Capitol. Speaker 0: Stormed the Capitol. Stormed Speaker 1: The capitol Stormed the capitol. Speaker 3: Stormed the US capitol building. Speaker 0: Stormed the United States capitol. He ran it through forensic software That technical investigators use for analyzing audio and video to make sure we heard correctly and it had not been altered. I'm here for someone. Speaker 1: Hey. My We're here to serve the capital. Hell, yeah. Well, alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe. Speaker 0: And search through hours of footage, Countless news stories, EPPS's FBI case documents, and his deposition before the January 6th committee to see if it had been discussed With the exception of 1 rider we found on substack, it hadn't. Speaker 1: To the capital, where our problems are. It's that direction. Speaker 0: Epps, who continue to direct people to the capital In the cold light of day on January 6th did not go into the capital himself according to the January 6th committee And the FBI. He's never explained publicly why he said storm the capital, what he meant by that, Or what you may have known. Alright. So why hasn't it been addressed? Speaker 3: Nobody cared about the Rayap story for the 1st year after January 6th. It was just a Nothing Burger to everyone for some reason. I thought it was a big story, but, I was banned off Twitter. I was banned off YouTube. I was banned off all social media, so I couldn't get The story out, you know, I I was not able to get into the mainstream. Speaker 0: The lack of curiosity would not be enough once the Rayeb story caught fire. Speaker 6: Something happened after he left Oath Keepers Until January 6th, what? I don't know. But those were 2 different people. Speaker 0: It turned out January 5th Was not the 1st time Ray Epps encountered Baked Alaska. We recovered live stream video from a rally in Phoenix where Epps seemed to point his camera right at him and take a photo. Speaker 5: We're looking at every angle that we can. No preconceived ideas. Speaker 1: That's how you get to the truth.
RyanAFournier
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 3:04 PM
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 8:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ray Epps, a known agitator, played a significant role in the events at the Capitol. His statements encouraging violence are captured on tape. Epps, like others involved, should face appropriate consequences for his actions.

@RyanAFournier - Ryan Fournier

Ray Epps is 100% no doubt an asset to the Feds. There is no way you could say things like "We are here to storm the Capitol," or encourage others to do so without facing the same punishment as them. AND it is all on tape. Ray Epps was an agitator of the events that transpired, and he deserves full punishment.

amuse
Posted - November 12, 2023 at 3:42 PM
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 8:25 PM

@amuse - @amuse

FED? @laralogan has exposed the fact that Ray Epps had been scouting Baked Alaska weeks before J6. Ray claims he wasn’t working with the Feds so who was he working with? We need hearings @mtgreenee. https://t.co/o8FQpJSpFZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
On November 30th, after the 2020 election, a video was discovered that had been removed from the internet. Forensics experts found a single copy buried in an online archive. The video showed Raheb pacing near Bay Telaska, who seemed to have his attention. Epps, the person filming, pointed his camera at Telaska and took a photo before walking away. He returned a minute later to take another photo in the same area. The video is 11 hours, 10 minutes, and 55 seconds long.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: November 30th, shortly after the 2020 election. Crime. It appeared to have been scrubbed from the Internet. Okay. According to forensics experts we consulted, who found a single copy buried deep in an online archive Let's go. And managed to Struck the full livestream of 11 hours 10 minutes and 55 seconds. Here, it showed Raheb's pacing back and forth a short way from Bay Telaska who seemed to have his attention as he looked over in his direction repeatedly, 13 times by our count. The devil. Then Epps stopped and pointed his camera right at him, snagging a photo before putting his phone down and walking away, only to reemerge on camera roughly a minute later, taking another photo in the same area. Not long after that, he
MikeGil21446788
Posted - November 17, 2023 at 7:34 PM
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 7:46 PM

@MikeGil21446788 - Mike Gill

All right let’s get this straight. Jan6 from the very beginning was always a FBI operation to keep Trump returning or staying as President. Their number 1 assets General Flynn and Roger Stone. I was there with General Flynn and his team.They made sure Trump never saw my evidence

@Truth_InMedia - Truth In Media

The first time Ray Epps approached @bakedalaska and told him to go into the Capitol, Baked Alaska left to an area far away from him. Epps then followed him, repeating his calls for protesters to enter the Capitol. It didn’t take long for the crowd to conclude Epps was a plant. https://t.co/FDtrhvaQLu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss an incident where a person named Ray Epps repeatedly urged them and others to go into the capital building. Speaker 1 recalls encountering Epps on January 5th during a protest outside BLM Plaza. Epps followed Speaker 1 and began instructing the crowd, famously saying they should go into the capital the next day. Speaker 0 also expresses readiness to go into the capital. Speaker 1 questions whether Epps was part of a scripted plan or an undercover agent inciting violence. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 emphasizing the need to go to the capital where their problems lie.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We need to go in to the capital. Speaker 1: He told them at least 12 times what he wanted them to focus on. When I first saw Ray Epps, he came up to me. This is January 5th. We're outside BLM Plaza. We're protesting. Speaker 0: USA. US. Speaker 1: Reabs came up to me and started saying, we need to go into the capital. I go to another group way Far away from him, he follows me, and then he starts instructing the crowd, and that's that's the famous moment. He says, we need to go Into the capital. Tomorrow. Speaker 0: We're just We need to go into the capital. I'm ready to go. Into the capital. Speaker 1: Woah. This is scripted. No. No. He he's definitely a plan. Don't get it. 100%. Did undercover agents or assets for the federal government agitate people to go into the capital and encourage or incite violence. Speaker 0: We are going to the capital Where our problems are, it's that direction.
battleofever
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 1:39 PM
Saved - November 12, 2025 at 1:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread arguing Jan 6 was a setup by elites to derail Trump, citing claimed insider texts, undercover agents, staged protests, and pre-made statements. It alleges GOP/Dem collusion, political prisoners, misinformation, and calls for releasing full tapes. The posts frame the event as a coordinated coup and demand accountability for those responsible.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@rayeppswasafed - Truly American

Does anyone else remember when Michael Stenger (Senate Master at Arms on J6), basically said there were "Professional Agitators" there? He was found dead after this statement and prior to his in person testimony with J6 committee, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Runningtowardh1 - Runningtowardhappiness

Note that Michael Senger, in charge of security on J6, talked about "professional agitators" in a prepared statement before he mysteriously died. J6 was meant to derail what T was trying to do, to persuade lawmakers with overwhelming support of patriots. #2000Mules #PeoplePower

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RealTina40 - Tina40

This is DC by Freedom Plaza ... they say it’s for construction work but it’s left out over night ! 🤔🤔 be aware patriots.. watch your 6

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP AOC wasn't smart enough to realize what she'd exposed.

@AOC - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rep. Loudermilk released this statement yesterday: “I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021.” This morning, this footage was released. Dated January 5th, 2021.

@RepLoudermilk - Rep. Barry Loudermilk

🚨BREAKING🚨: The truth will always prevail. As I’ve said since the Jan. 6 Committee made their baseless accusation about me to the media, I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021…

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP Oopsie.

@BoLoudon - Bo Loudon

On January 6, 2021, NPR accidentally released an article at 9:33 AM about Trump supporters clashing with police... HOURS before anything like this ever occurred. Set up.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@laralogan - Lara Logan

It is so obvious what is going on here - the Republicans want to get rid of Trump but they don’t want their fingerprints on it so the Dems are doing it for them. They all know if Trump gets on the ballot it’s over. Same with the impeachment of Biden - the Dems want to get rid of him but they don’t want any of the blame so the Republicans are doing that for them. This is the elite establishment in action. They hate “wethepeople” & have no intention of allowing the constitution or the Republic to survive in anything but name only. Would not be surprised if more Dem controlled states follow suit - then the Republicans can say Trump cannot be the nominee because he can’t win if he is off the ballot in these states. Not their fault of course….Trump’s fault as usual!

@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen

THE PEOPLE ARE WITH DONALD J. TRUMP. His removal from the Colorado primary ballot is an ATTACK on our democracy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that political opponents are acting with extreme desperation and pursuing aggressive measures to win the election. Specifically, the speaker states that “crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary,” implying a willingness to employ drastic, even illicit, tactics to achieve victory. The claim continues that these opponents “are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election,” portraying a view that constitutional and legal norms are being broken in pursuit of electoral success. Further, the speaker characterizes Joe Biden as a direct danger to the democratic system, declaring that “Joe Biden is a threat to democracy.” The repetition emphasizes the perceived severity of the threat, with the speaker reiterating that “It’s a threat,” underscoring the seriousness attributed to Biden’s impact on democratic processes. Another central claim concerns the alleged use of state power to influence the election. The speaker contends that “they’re weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference,” suggesting that law enforcement agencies are being directed or used in ways that would undermine fair electoral processes. This accusation is tied to the assertion of electoral advantage, as the speaker claims that such actions are taking place “because we’re beating them so badly in the polls,” attributing the alleged use of force or influence to the current advantage in polling. Overall, the speaker outlines a narrative in which political adversaries are depicted as acting with unprecedented aggression toward securing electoral outcomes, including constitutional violations and the deployment of law enforcement in ways that would interfere with the election. The emphasis is on a perceived threat to democracy and on the strategic use of governmental power as a tool in contested political competition, framed by the assertion of a significant polling lead that allegedly prompts these aggressive tactics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's no wonder crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary. Are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election. Joe Biden is a threat to democracy. It's a threat. They're weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference because we're beating them so badly in the polls.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Sheckyi - Andrew C ™️

👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻 ARE YOU LISTENING?? Former Capitol Police Chief testifies Pelosi lied about her communication with him & made him the scapegoat for J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Pelosi claimed on national television that she had not spoken to the individual since the initial breach of the Capitol and that there had been no communications with him that evening. The individual, referred to as Speaker 1, confirmed that he spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that evening, contradicting her statement. First call (approximately 05:34 PM): The individual went to brief Vice President Pence at a secure location and to conduct a personal assessment of the Capitol, with House Sergeant at Arms Irving informed that he was going over to brief the Vice President. Irving wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. The first call to Speaker Pelosi occurred during this briefing, establishing direct contact while the briefing was underway. Second call (during departure from the initial location): As the individual left the area and was walking toward the Senate with Mr. Stenger, Jennifer Hemingway handed him Emily Barrett’s cell phone, and it was Speaker Pelosi on the line. This second call concerned the information provided to Vice President Pence about when the Capitol could be returned to the chambers, and the individual reassured Pelosi that the information was correct and that they could get back into the chambers by 7:00 PM. The call ended after this confirmation. Third call (06:25 PM): While at the Senate, away from the initial secure location, using Robert Karam’s cell phone, the individual dialed leadership who were off-site at a secure location to brief them. He briefed all of the leadership on the plans to get them back into the chambers, which constituted the third call with Speaker Pelosi. In summary, Speaker 1 asserts that there were three separate conversations with Speaker Pelosi on January 7, each addressing the situation and the plan to restore operations in the chambers, including confirmation of the timeline to return by 7:00 PM. He states that Pelosi’s claim of not speaking with him is inaccurate, affirming that he did indeed have three conversations with her that evening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A second set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol. But according to your transcribed interview, you were on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Can you explain that discrepancy? Speaker 1: Yeah. That is correct. I spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that that evening, and she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her, but I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the first time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location, I had called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president. Was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34, where I first briefed speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call second call with speaker Pelosi questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven seven p. M, and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 06:25 p. M. I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered. And on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership, who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have call number three with speaker Pelosi. Speaker 0: So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. Speaker 1: That is correct, sir.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

Many have missed what really happened on J6 - swept up in the 'action' staged outside by the 'protestors.' The entire thing was staged to allow RINOs (and anyone else interested) the occasion to abdicate their duties and bypass their obligation to contest the clearly stolen election. Lauffler, Cruz, , Hawley, Paul, and more had sworn they would help Trump and contest - and they are ALL frauds. They KNEW in advance of the Feds plan to stage J6 - as this was what it was all for - to give them the opportunity 'to walk away.' We KNOW for a fact that several Congress people exposed that they ALL knew of the event prior - as a few were busted sending out J6 'response statements' which were posted TO the internet - some to Twitter - PRIOR TO the event even taking place. Not one of these people came back afterward - or even later - and said, 'Hey, we were in the middle of an official, Constitutional proceeding. It was interrupted, but I wasn't finished contesting.' The reason they DIDN'T ever say that?? Because they never really wanted to back Trump in the first place. They LIED. They knew of the plan prior, and they walked away. ALL part of the COUP.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🇺🇸 J6 FLASHBACK On Jan 05, 2021, Chuck Grassley announced that Pence would not be attending the election certification on 1/06/21 and that he (Grassley) would preside. A very ODD statement and Grassley has never FULLY answered for it. 👉🏼 COUP https://www.businessinsider.com/grassley-prompts-confusion-over-pence-electoral-college-certification-2021-1

GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley briefly confuses everyone over announcement on Pence and Electoral College certification GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested that Vice President Mike Pence would skip the Electoral College certification before backtracking. businessinsider.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Since Mike Pence is making J6 the centerpiece of his campaign, I thought I would compare his book to the J6 committee testimony of his 2 top aides. And guess what? They don't jive. Pence said Marc Short and Greg Jacob showed up 2 hours later than they actually did. Pence made it sound like he singlehandedly wrote his statement rejecting the "Eastman Plan" when he didn't. He said he forgot to save the document on his desktop computer so his daughter had to rewrite a printed version for him. (Short and Jacob never mention this) He also omitted a 9:15 a.m. call from Trump that morning, when he apparently didn't tell the president he was working on a public statement for release. Then he said he traveled to the Capitol with his family--but Marc Short said they were in a different vehicle. Weird. https://www.declassified.live/p/mike-pences-rewriting-of-his-january

Mike Pence's Rewriting of His January 6 Heroism As he makes his actions on January 6 the centerpiece of his campaign, Pence appears to have a different recollection than those of his top aides. declassified.live

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

@StevieW64261083 @GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump Renew your mind. Here's a starter pkg. #J6 #January6th #politicalprisoners

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

FLASHBACK: Video never seen or used by J6 COMMITTEE re-emerges of Jacob Chansley reading Trump’s tweet, telling protestors to GO HOME and remain peaceful.. CORPORATE MEDIA DEAD SILENT..

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Easiest way to tell that FOIA claims of Nancy Pelosi was on the phone at least a dozen times with Ray Epps on J6 is true, is when the media disputes it 💯%

@DesireeAmerica4 - Desiree

Everything about J6 was a hoax, check out the onion in her towel right at the beginning. 🙄

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ma'am, what what happened to you? Speaker 1: I got maced. Speaker 0: You got maced. My my place. And what happened? You were trying to go inside the cafe? I made it like a foot inside, Speaker 1: and they pushed me out, and they maced me. Speaker 0: What's your what's your name? Where are from? Speaker 1: My name is Elizabeth. I'm from Knoxville, Tennessee. Speaker 0: And why did you wanna go in? We're storming the Capitol. It's a revolution. Thank you.

@PizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe 🇺🇸

Another unreleased video from J6. Capitol Police cuff a protestor, then bring him to a side room where they uncuffed him, and fist bumped him.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Notice how the FBI removed barricades, which the DOJ now says were a magic Secret Service perimeter that more than a thousand Americans have been criminally charged with crossing.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

At 2:30 p.m. - more than an hour and a half after Ray Epps ran through at the Peace Circle - FBI Swat (supposedly stationed and ready just minutes away) finally pulled into the Capitol.

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

Just released video shows FBI removing barricades on J6. Over 1,000 protestors were charged with knocking down and crossing this perimeter even though Feds had removed it. J6 was a lie just like everything else the Democrats do. Free the defendants.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that Jack Smith’s request to prevent evidence about security or intelligence failures before January 6 is unacceptable, claiming it would excuse Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC for failures. He asserts Pelosi was responsible for January 6 because she did not accept the security help offered, stating that 10,000 troops or National Guard were available if needed before the event, and that the event would have been different if 500 or 200 people had been used; he emphasizes that he offered 10,000 troops and that January 6 would not have happened with a larger deployment. He notes that he personally attended and gave a speech, and claims the audience included the largest number he has spoken to, contrasting with the smaller group that he says went down to the Capitol. Speaker 1 contends that the party should be allowed to introduce evidence showing that there were security and intelligence shortcomings, including the assertion that Pelosi “did not take the security that we offered her,” with the offer of 10,000 troops and the fact that “you had far fewer people than that.” He mentions that the unselect committee did not discuss or include references to “peacefully and patriotically” behaving crowds and says this group was not highlighted by the committee or in their words. He criticizes the prosecutor, calling Jack Smith a “deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out,” and accuses Smith of wanting to suppress testimony because the committee “illegally destroyed everything” and deleted evidence related to Pelosi’s decisions about troop deployment. He asserts that much evidence indicated Pelosi did not want the troops and that a letter from the mayor contradicted Pelosi’s stance. Speaker 0 acknowledges the point but keeps the dialogue focused; Speaker 0 reminds that Capitol Police Chief Steve Sun said January 6 was a preventable event if the intelligence and resources requested had been provided, noting that Speaker 0 sees this as an amazing point and confirms that the offer of troops was in writing. Speaker 1 reiterates that he offered 10,000 troops for January 6 and emphasizes that this fact is in writing, arguing that the prosecution is attempting to suppress relevant evidence. He maintains that Pelosi’s leadership and decisions about security are central to the discussion, and he reiterates the claim that the offer of security was not acted upon. The conversation pivots back to the assertion that the Capitol Police Chief’s past statements support the claim that January 6 was preventable with proper intelligence and resources.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jack Smith says he doesn't want you to be able to introduce evidence in your defense that maybe the January was preventable, that police and others had, engaged in some security failures, intelligence failures beforehand. Your reaction real quickly to the prosecutor's request today. Speaker 1: No. Can you believe this? He's tried to defend Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC, but he tried to defend Nancy Pelosi who did not do the job. We offered them, as you know, 10,000 troops or national guard, whatever they wanted before the event, because I knew it was gonna be a very big event. And I it wasn't my event. I went and showed up and made a speech. We offered 10,000 people and more if necessary. And if they use 500 people, if they use 200 people, January 6 wouldn't have been January 6. So they can you imagine? This guy says, we don't wanna introduce that. Well, that's a very big part of it. She was responsible for January 6 because she didn't take the security that we offered her. We offered her 10,000 troops And, you know, you had far fewer people than that. It was a very small group of people relatively compared to the people listening to the speech was which was, by the way, the largest number of people that I've ever spoken before. Nobody ever talks about that, John. They talk about the group that went down and peacefully and patriotically, as I said, as you know, they don't mention that either. You know, that wasn't even brought up in the unselect committee. They didn't even use those words. They didn't say that I said the words peacefully and patriotically. This is a very dishonest group of people. And the deranged prosecutor, Jack Smith, he's a deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out. And you look at this guy, he doesn't want me to say that they turned down and they turned it down in writing, by the way. And what happened is, as you know, the unselect committee deleted and threw out everything. They threw everything out, which would be illegal. If you ever did that in a court, a regular court as a civilian, could you imagine somebody on the right, a republican or something somebody doing as you know, they deleted and threw out all everything having to do with the hearings because a lot of bad things were said about Nancy Pelosi. A lot of bad things were said about a lot of people that they didn't wanna get out to the public. So they threw out everything. They deleted everything. There is no information. There's nothing left. It's like crazy. And the reason he doesn't wanna do that is because they illegally destroyed everything. They destroyed all evidence. So he wants to do this because of the fact that they destroyed all evidence. They don't have the evidence anymore. And a lot of that evidence was pinpointing that Nancy Pelosi didn't take the troops days in advance. Said it. And I said it loud and clear. And they know I said it because I believe it was the mayor wrote a letter back that she doesn't want the troops. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know. It's exciting. Speaker 1: It's Yeah. But can you imagine a man saying, we're not allowed to bring the fact up that I offered 10,000 troops for January 6? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: He's you know, look. He's got a bad record. He's lost a lot of cases, and he loses them because he goes too far. He's a sick puppy. Speaker 0: Well, it's important to note the Capitol Police Chief, the former chief Steve Sun, said on this show that January 6 was a preventable event. Had they gotten the intelligence and the resources that he had asked, you offered them. It just didn't happen. It's just an amazing thing. Sir, I wanna turn to Speaker 1: I offered them. It's true. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. There's no doubt. It's in writing.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism – by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism - by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor           Guest post by January 6 political prisoner Isaac A. thegatewaypundit.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Source of full video https://rumble.com/v2fkvuq-undercover-mpd-footage-from-jan-6..html

undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. https://t.me/StopHateChat/20086 rumble.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨BREAKING: Cell phone video of DC officer on J6 saying “we go undercover as Antifa in the crowd” They’re ADMITTING it How many cops & federal agents were undercover that day? How many instigated violence & property destruction? Release the J6 tapes!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@catmurphy209 - Americat 🇺🇸

It has been three years since the murder of Ashli Babbitt. Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt. "Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead." https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-judicial-watch-launches-lawsuit-against-us-government-for-wrongful-death-of-ashli-babbitt

BREAKING: Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt “Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead.” thepostmillennial.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#ReleaseJ6PoliticalPrisoners! @gatewaypundit Article...

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Everyone can see, if you’re looking…

@RealFletch17 - Fletch17

Wow! Good clip of the signs and warnings they give to their puppets. Hey @LeaderMcConnell looks like you saw a ghost…….

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Pro__Trading - Pro America Politics

JUST IN: President Trump says the FBI was "leading the charge" on J6. Cue liberal meltdown...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that there were many of them, noting that there was Antifa and there was FBI, along with a lot of other people there, all leading the charge. “You saw the same people that I did.” The passage ends with, “But just as…”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And those people have to be many of them. I guess there's some. By the way, there was Antifa and there was FBI. There were a lot of other people there too leading the charge leading the charge. You saw the same people that I did. But just as

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP #RayEpps was a Fed

@bamajayt - Bama_Jeans

@DarrenJBeattie about Ray EPPS compared to other Jan 6 protesters I can feel the anger swelling in me again...😡

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

FEDS AND INFORMANTS EVERYWHERE ON J6 "This is much worse than you can imagine" FBI had agents everywhere on January 6th. The FEDS lost count of how many paid informants there were and had to do an audit to find out. Credit: @TheRedactedInc

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THERE IS NO BASIS FOR ARRESTING THE J6 PRISONERS. J6 was a setup. The police allowed protestors to enter. They need to be released immediately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The material comes from the United States Department of Justice and shows surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33 PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the Capitol undeterred. At 02:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enters through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undeterred. At 02:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36:54, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44 PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. At 02:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the capital through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 02:35PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enter through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 02:36PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36 fifty four, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the capital. At 02:47PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

J6: A TRUE TIMELINE FULL DOCUMENTARY J6: A True Timeline presents a never-before-seen timestamped blueprint for the events of January 6, 2021, as they unfolded in real-time. Credit: @InvestigateJ6 https://open.ink/collections/j6

J6 Thousands of crowdsourced video files. Hundreds of hours of CCTV footage. Dozens of police officer body cams. One True Timeline. open.ink

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

NANCY PELOSI'S DAUGHTER ADMITTING J6 WAS A HOAX Nancy Pelosi's daughter was secretly recorded talking about the fake staged J6 insurrection. Shall we keep going? You don't have to answer that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the political and legal dynamics surrounding potential investigations and trials, focusing on timing, venue, and public interest. - They agree that if Democrats lose the House and the committee is eliminated, public interest may wane. The first trials, if they occur, are expected to attract a lot of attention, similar to anniversaries, but interest could fade once Democrats are out of power and especially if Biden is removed from office. - The idea of dragging proceedings out is considered, with caution that delaying too long could reduce attention. They suggest not initiating a first trial in Washington, DC, because DC has many government workers and may be sympathetic to the defense; this relates to concerns about the potential jury pool. - There is a debate about whether the trial should be moved out of DC. Speaker 1 believes it would be difficult to move the trial and that those in DC would resist removal, arguing that hearings would be seen as fair and the jury would be impartial if held there, contrasting with Speaker 0’s concern about DC’s jury demographics. - They discuss the likelihood of successfully moving the trial, with Speaker 1 asserting that it would not be successfully moved and that the defense or supporters would resist. - The conversation touches on a hypothetical interaction with an individual who might have been involved in insurrection plans. Speaker 0 asks about what the plan would be if such an individual were in line and marching, in a military context, suggesting a scenario where operations would be outlined: “you’re gonna go here,” “you’re gonna go in by this side,” “at this time, we’re gonna take over this.” They describe the insurrection as lacking guns and involving a man “smoking pot,” noting it as the most pitiable insurrection of the 21st century. - They shift to an observation about the Proud Boys, mentioning Gavin McGinnis. Speaker 0 describes knowing Gavin from road trips to parties and finding the term “Proud Wizards” humorous when they first heard it in Brooklyn years ago. Speaker 0 characterizes McGinnis as a provocateur who says shocking things to be funny, and expresses amusement at his elevation to a prominent figure. - Speaker 0 clarifies that they have a personal history with these people and emphasizes that McGinnis says outrageous things, which they view in a historical and somewhat humorous light, contrasting with the contemporary prominence of the group. - The exchange ends with Speaker 0 explaining their familiarity with the individuals and reiterating that the portrayal of these figures is part of their broader historical context.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing, if you drag it out after the Democrats lose the house Yeah. Yeah. And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Yeah. The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. Yes. It's like anniversaries. If the first one Speaker 1: is a Speaker 0: big deal, they're gonna really be dealing the same. Right. No one's gonna care after the democrats out of power. Right. And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm sympathetic. Speaker 1: That's our the jury. That's the that's the jury issue. We we don't need the trial to be held there. Speaker 0: Well, you guys would, you totally hit off. Speaker 1: I I would. They won't successfully Speaker 0: successfully move move it? It? Speaker 1: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard of the hearings. The team. They'll you're say They're in the next say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. Speaker 0: Thank you for your Speaker 1: time. Oh, absolutely. Speaker 0: Listen. I really I I know you're not the bad guy. I mean, if there is I haven't found the bad guy yet. But if there is, I Speaker 1: know you're not guy. I mean, he's he's like a stereotypical bad guy. Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan is Speaker 1: that Really? Speaker 0: If there was a if there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line marching you're in the military. Speaker 1: You know this? No. Doesn't Speaker 0: You must have a plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. You just go to operations. It's over. You sit down Like Overnight your soldiers. You go over. Alright. You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this side. At this time, we're gonna take over this there's none of that. You move the insurrection. It's the sorriest insurrection in in the twentieth twenty first century ever. No guns. A guy Speaker 0: guy People Speaker 1: think so. Guy smoking pot. You know, Speaker 0: on Oh, I love the guy smoking Yeah. Speaker 1: I like for history. Speaker 0: You're gonna be able to laugh about this one day. I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know Gavin McGinnis. I went on road trips with them to parties. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, Proud Wizards from this was, like, years ago when they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may say he may talk shit, but a lot of it is, like, he's a provocateur. He says it to, like, be funny or whatever. Right. The idea that he's now being elevated to being this Yeah. It totally makes me laugh because I'm like, like, I know this guy. I've been in many parties with him, and I know he just says some crazy shit. I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, Speaker 1: and I was just Speaker 0: like So I just wanted you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people, I'm like, come on. You're you're like, that's just kinda like anyway.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🗳️ STOLEN ELECTIONS & THE 2020 COUP @battleofever @RedpillDrifter J6 - They Needed an Emergency Session 👉🏼 YES !! This Fed-led 'riot' distraction was NOT about 'getting Trump and MAGA' - it was a vehicle to allow Corrupt Congress to STEAL the election. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/06/fedsurrection-anniversary-day-they-needed-an-emergency-session/

Fedsurrection Anniversary Day - They Needed an Emergency Session - The Last Refuge In honor of our national gaslighting embarrassment, the third anniversary of the FBI’s fedsurrection, the FBI laughed in the faces of the general population under their control.  The DC-based FBI sent out this message: Yes, the national kidnappers have removed their masks. Y’all know what that metaphor means. Once again, for those who just walked […] theconservativetreehouse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

[Thread] #J6 (Below) Ongoing Compilation of #J6TrueTimeline Next up: 🔥 RINOs 🔥 who prepared statements beforehand, we're in on the setup, and used it as a way to dump #Trump. We are taking names. Another Thread Incoming. #J6WasASetup #AshliBabbitt #RINOsKnew

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@hollywood2pt0 - Jewely💎Blue

📽️The live footage of J6 [they] fed us was NOT LIVE Yes things happened there, but guaranteed what we were FED on NOT-live TV, as well as the pics after-the-fact, were sensationalized...MANIPULATED... PRODUCED SMOKE & MIRRORS Lest we forget what President Trump recorded, that Twitter & the rest of MSM took down to FRAME him and US.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes that on 07/18/2023 special counsel Jack Smith has decided to pursue another arrest and more indictments of President Trump, alleging it is a result of the Fed storming the Capitol on 01/06/2021 and targeting Trump for his role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on that date. He asserts that all President Trump did was give a speech and that he incited nothing. He claims the people disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were “our government.” He argues that when videos from the Capitol appeared, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, claimed the videos were manipulated, asserting they were added to with people, sound, fire, and smoke, probably mirrors, to make it look horrific. He says footage has been removed from the Internet, making reflection on 01/06 difficult, and that all remaining footage is manipulated, stating there was not all the fire and smoke and that the famous picture is a manipulated image. He asserts the rioters didn’t bring guns and that there was no fire or smoke, but instead “where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” and that history has been changed and references are no longer available. He claims that during the Fed’s direction, Trump did say on video what he should have said, including “I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There’s nothing more he could have said.” He notes the video is difficult to find but exonerates Trump, maintaining he incited nothing, especially since the feds were doing most of it. He says this video will be important in the coming weeks and months as Smith continues to go after Trump, predicting suppression of the video by social media platforms, as in the immediate aftermath of the Fed’s direction. He says he captured the video and urges sharing. Speaker 1 quotes Trump: “I know you’re pained. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very special. You’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.” Speaker 0 adds that Tucker Carlson claimed Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing the insurrection hired a Good Morning America producer to dramatize the footage and even dubbed in sound, to make it more sensational, implying the footage was staged. He questions why it would be necessary to add sound and create more people and fire or smoke to redefine the events, suggesting the feds planted and altered footage to present an insurrection. Speaker 2 reinforces the claim with a direct statement: “How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 07/18/2023. And as most of you already know, special counsel Jack Smith has decided to throw another arrest, and god only knows how many more indictments towards president Trump. And it's completely a result of the Fed storming the capital on 01/06/2021. And Smith is going after president Trump for president Trump's role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on 01/06/2021, which is funny because all president Trump did was give a speech. He incited nothing. The people that were disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were, well, they were our government. And And after all this happened, when videos started coming out from the capital, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, was the one who said what I've been saying all along, that the videos were manipulated. They, I knew, added people and sound and fire and smoke and probably mirrors to make it look horrific because it's hard to do this now because we have nothing to reference. They've removed it from the Internet, but when it was happening on the sixth, I hope you all remember that everybody that was in Washington DC while that was going on, they were having trouble getting any video or footage out to any of us on Twitter or in other states. Washington DC did exactly what they did when I was at the million mega march with my brother in November a few months prior, and they cut Internet. They wouldn't let anybody get information or very little information out. So now it's hard to reflect back on what January 6 was because all the footage has been removed from the Internet. More so, any of the footage that you can still see from 01/06/2021, mark my words, it's manipulated footage. Remember back. Think really hard. There was not all the fire and the smoke. You know that picture we all know? This one right here? This is a manipulated picture. They didn't do all of this. These people that were storming the capital didn't even bring guns with them to this insurrection. There was no fire. There was no smoke. But where there's smoke, there's fire. They've changed the history, what we saw with our eyes, and now we can't recollect it because they've removed it and our ability to reference anything. All that said, during the Fed's erection, president Trump got on video and said exactly what he should have said. This video that I'm putting up here on both Rumble and BitShoot tonight is very difficult to find unless you use the right search words, but it exonerates president Trump. Not that he needs exoneration because he incited nothing, especially because the feds were doing most of it. He said all the right words. I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There's nothing more he could have said. This is going to be a very important video coming up in the next weeks and months as Smith continues to go after president Trump. They have nothing. They are going to be suppressing this, and just like they did right after the Fed's direction, everybody that put it on Twitter or any social media platform, they would rip it down. They would suspend the person that post it. It's gonna happen again because this piece of video is everything they don't want out there for the rest of the world to see. So I've captured it for you. Share it with anyone you'd like, and get ready for the ride. Speaker 1: I know you're pained. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace. Speaker 0: And just in case you missed it, this is actually out of my video when Tucker Carlson said, this was back in March or April, that the Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing this insurrection, that they hired a Good Morning America producer to make it more sensational, and they even dubbed in sound. No. Really think about that. What would be the reason of all the reasons in the world that it would be okay, needed, necessary for those feds that planted the feds' erection to say, here's all this capital video footage. What can we do here to it that we shouldn't be doing? Well, if we add sound and we create more people and we add in fire and smoke, then all of a sudden, this becomes an insurrection. This is the footage we're gonna put out into the public. Anyway, here's Tucker and what he said just a few months ago laying it out there, and it's almost like it didn't happen. Most people didn't even catch him saying this, but it's huge. Speaker 2: How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@USA_Anne711 - ❣️Anne❣️

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 ‘Then Lied About It’. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard told reporter Neil McCabe: “Milley controlled the Army”, arguing that while the Joint Chiefs boss lacked legal authority within the chain of command, he instead leveraged his profound influence and contacts in the Pentagon to delay the Guard’s response. “The problem was not with Donald Trump; it’s Mark Milley and the Army leadership in control. They stopped the Guard from coming then lied about it and said the Guard acted at sprint speed,” Matthews explained. “This is about civilian control of the military. There was none. There is none. I argue that — Mark Milley had more control over the D.C. Guard on Jan. 6 than Donald Trump did — if Donald Trump wanted to call the Guard to go to the Capitol, Milley wouldn’t let him do it.” Details👇 https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/01/12/explosive-report-army-official-says-mark-milley-delayed-national-guard-response-to-jan-6-then-lied-about-it/

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 'Then Lied About It'. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard on January 6th, 2021, thenationalpulse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP!

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

BOMBSHELL.🚨 "It has come out in a recent federal lawsuit that U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd... issued a false radio report that 'shots were fired'..." Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter Michael Byrd Made a False Radio Call Shortly After Fatal Incident https://thepoliticsbrief.com/ashli-babbitts-shooter-michael-byrd-made-a-false-radio-call-shortly-after-fatal-incident/

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@paulsperry_ - Paul Sperry

BREAKING: Obama DOJ official Mary McCord--part of Gen. Flynn coup--secretly worked with J6 Committee's Red Team + Purple Team investigators “We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things [Trump] might do" https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159

Fears grow that Trump will use the military in ‘dictatorial ways’ if he returns to the White House Donald Trump is sparking fears among those who understand the inner workings of the Pentagon. nbcnews.com
innercitypress
Posted - February 1, 2024 at 7:16 PM
Saved - February 2, 2024 at 2:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CIA leaker Josh Schulte has been sentenced to 480 months in prison for giving malicious hacking tools to Wikileaks, along with possessing child pornography. The judge found that Schulte's conduct was retaliatory and that he posed a risk to national security. Schulte's lawyer argued for a downward variance, citing his client's suffering in confinement, but the judge disagreed. The judge acknowledged the harsh conditions of Schulte's confinement but stated that a life sentence was not warranted. Schulte has the option to appeal the decision.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

OK - now at sentencing of CIA leaker Josh Schulte, convicted of giving Vault7 US malicious hacking tools to Wikileaks (& having CP). DOJ wants life sentence. Inner City Press cover the trials and will live tweet, thread below. Book: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0B6GRHV6J

Sorry! Something went wrong! amazon.com

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

All rise! Judge Furman: We are here for sentencing. It has been a long road, but we are finally here. I have read the letters. [One by his youngest brother Reagan says "he can be arrogant, selfish, condescending and more" https://www.innercitypress.com/sdnylive120schultefurman011924.html

After Guilty Verdicts in Wikileaks Trial Schulte Had Laptop Seized Now Asks for 108 MonthsInner City Press: Investigative Reporting from the United Nations InnerCityPress.com is engaged these days in investigative journalism from the United Nations, including the World Bank, the IMF, the UN Development Program and the five continents. innercitypress.com

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: I'll defer judgment on sealing letters; the classified CIA filings will remain classified. Mr. Denton, have you notified victims? AUSA Denton: We have, your Honor. Judge: The Pre-Sentencing Report - did you review it Mr. Schulte? Schulte: Last week

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: Let me address the defense objections to the factual recitations. I overrule them. Paragraph 39 references the situation that led to his remand while he was on bail - it states it was access to the Internet through the cousin. It's not material.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: The paragraphs concerning Mr. Schulte's use of the discovery laptop and the materials subsequently found on them, I find very relevant to sentencing. I adopt the factual recitations of the PSR, it will remain under seal.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: The history is a six due to terrorism enhancement, for a guideline of life imprisonment. There is a disagreement about the application of the terrorism enhancement. I find that it applies.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: I find that his conduct was designed to retaliate against the Government, that it was in employee employer relationship makes no difference. He leaked the entire arsenal of the US' cyber tools. That he differs from McVeigh and Osama doesn't matter

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: He lied to the FBI, and in his counseled interviews with the US Attorney's Office. He used his sophisticated knowledge to commit his espionage offenses. He abuses his position in charge of the Atlassian suite - the enhancement applies

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: I will be arguing for a substantial downward variance. Judge: I will hear from the Government, then Mr. Schulte's counsel and finally Mr. Schulte himself, should he choose to speak. Government? AUSA Denton: The Court knows this defendant

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

AUSA Denton: Since he represented himself, the Court saw his behavior and who he is. You heard, We told you to stop but you did. He violated protective orders. It is no small thing for DOJ to ask for a life sentence. But he is unique. Esponionage...

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

AUSA Denton: This was one of the most damaging instances of leaking in US history. The information was publicized, and so it cascaded. Then while incarcerated, he treated every limit as a challenge. That's what led to the information war

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

AUSA Denton: He viewed the [CP] for years, and while incarcerated on espionage charges. There is a need for incapacitation. Judge: On incapacitation, I'm inclined to agree. He has extraordinary computer skills and has a history of leaking.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: But at what point do those risks dissipate? At some point, his information is no longer ripe. In prison, his computer skills will atrophy. Do you catch my drift? AUSA Denton: It's variable. We want Special Administrative Measures to continue.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

AUSA Denton: Some of his info will persist - the identity of covert agents in the CIA. He tried to publish it in filings. It has happened. These information will remain sensitive as long as those operatives are alive.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: Some have called the terrorism enhancement taking a wrecking ball to the [Sentencing] Guidelines. Can you address that? AUSA Denton: It reflects the seriousness of terrorism crimes. Congress decided this. & the history enhancement: he's hard to rehabilitate

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: What about restitution? AUSA Denton: We'll calculate them in 90 days. Schulte's lawyer: What is the least necessary punishment here? This is a difficult case. Joshua Schulte has certainly been convicted of very serious crimes. Is he capable of redemption?

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: Yes. The conditions of confinement have been so debilitating, he's unlikely to do this again. He still has hoped and dreams - the simple things in life. A face to face meeting with a loved one. A private conversation. The sun on his face

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: Has he forfeited all this forever? We say No. We are not relitigating the SAMs [Special Administrative Measures]. His torturous conditions go beyond what he did. The Court told the MDC you have to consider humanity [Judge Furman's US v. Chavez]

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: It has been torture: lock down 23 hours a day. His lights are on all the time. Nonstop white noise. [Inner City Press reported on this in Cholo Abdullah case: https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny88htorresabdullahicp121923.html

Man Charged with al Shabaab Attack Plan Cited White Noise in MDC Now Trial Delayed to OctInner City Press: Investigative Reporting from the United Nations InnerCityPress.com is engaged these days in investigative journalism from the United Nations, including the World Bank, the IMF, the UN Development Program and the five continents. innercitypress.com

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: We held up his Pre-Sentencing Report to the glass so he could read it. They skip his commissary. No entertainment. It's not part of the SAMs. He gets mail months late. A life sentence means he will never see his family.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: You say without enhancement it would be 210 months. I calculate 310 months - if you subtract the points from groups, it's 324 to 405 months. Opine? Schulte's lawyer: You're asking me to do math on the spot... Even 405 months is not life imprisonment

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: I was in a hearing in the other courthouse recently, Judge Hellerstein eliminated the movement across to criminal history 6 [Inner CIty Press is covering this case too: Venenzuela's Cliver, Fatico hearing next: https://www.innercitypress.com/sdny40ehellersteinvenezhonddrugsicp011824.html

Prosecution of Venezuela Cartel Citing Maduro Had Cliver Pleading Guilty Now Fatico HearingInner City Press: Investigative Reporting from the United Nations InnerCityPress.com is engaged these days in investigative journalism from the United Nations, including the World Bank, the IMF, the UN Development Program and the five continents. innercitypress.com

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: Mr. Denton, any math? AUSA Denton: We agree on the math. Judge: Forfeiture? Schulte's lawyer: We haven't had a change to speak about it. I only got it this afternoon. We oppose forfeiting any hard drive with his resume on it

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Schulte's lawyer: Some of the devices seized are not related to the offenses. Judge: I think I have to impose forfeiture along with the sentencing. AUSA Denton: You could amend it later under Rule 36, I believe Judge: That rules seems to allow amendment

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge: Mr. Schulte, if you'd like to speak before I sentence you, this is your chance. Joshua Schulte: I have 25 to 30 minutes if the Court allows it. [Silence] Judge Furman: Go ahead.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: I have been tortured worse than any other prisoner in the Western Hemisphere. I have no access to the library. Instead of 300 monthly phone minutes, I am given 30. I am restricted in mail. The FBI seizes much of it. I have no access to religious

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: The US Federal government tortures me with 24/7 white noise & solitary confinement. The window is blacked out. When I am offered access to law library, I have to urinate and defecate on the floor, I am left there for 9 hours. I was left with sewage

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: I have been locked in my torture cage with rodent excrement. Ice accumulates near the window. I wash my clothes in my toilet. I'm forced to eat with my bare hands like an animal. They look down on you like you are not human. We are shown off like a zoo

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: They'd say, "There is El Chapo... There is the guy who ran over those people on the West Side Highway" [Saipov - book: Terror in Tribeca / Sayfullo Saipov's Capital Trial in the SDNY https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0BYB6FQ6H https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/terror-in-tribeca-murderers-mitigation-matthew-russell-lee/1143209100

Amazon.com amazon.com
Terror in Tribeca / Murderer's Mitigation: Sayfullo Saipov's Capital Trial in the SDNY|Paperback Halloween in lower Manhattan means a parade in Greenwich Village; on October 31, 2017 there were bicyclists on the West Side Highway bike path in barnesandnoble.com

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: This is NYC's very own Auschwitz... Dickens said solitary confinement eats the prisoner from the inside out. Only the SS could dream of this. Concentration camp is an apt name for my confinement. It's mental torture. Viktor Frankl, I relate to

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: Nelson Mandel wrote about solitary, he begged for its reversal. He wrote, Every hour seemed like a year. I relished conversation with a cockroach. I do that too, it doesn't even seem crazy after a while.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: As a result of my torture by this government, there are fewer blood vessels in my brain... History will side with me.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: I am suffering a 30 year trial penalty. I was denied discovery material, including forensic images. They say I stole from a third server - but did not give me access to it.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: DOJ seeks to tell all, Those who go to trial will be punished. District courts don't follow the 973 guidelines, worse than the CP guidelines. The 2d Circuit has expressed doubts, in dictum. Follow the other courts. Probation proposes 5 x the average

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: Wikileaks about released Confluence, which the CIA described in 302s as insignificant. We should access but were denied. The CIA has no idea what was taken. Protocol requires them to scrap everything and start over. That should not be relied on

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: It is disgusting to compare this case to Pearl Harbor... The truly difficult question for the Court today is, How do you quantify torture? How much credit would a man in Auschwitz receive? What about NYC's Auschwitz?

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: The BOP is a rogue agency that will never be reigned in until those tortured get time served - they BOP will leap to obey. Until then, they'll take pride in their concentration camps. BOP will torture me, they invite you to join them

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Josh Schulte: The BOP violates the Torah and all principles. I ask this Court to reject the espionage guidelines. I ask for time served. Judge: He spoke for 29 minutes... Any reason sentence should not be imposes at this time? AUSA Denton: No, your Honor.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: A substantial sentence is warranted. It is hard to overstate the seriousness of the espionage offences. The classified letter shows catastrophic impact on national security. $300 million was the tip of the iceberg. We'll never fully know the damage

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: It is not an exaggeration to call it a digital Pearl Harbor. He was not blowing the whistle, he was motivated by anger, spite and perceived grievance. He took it out on the country he swore to protect. Then there the CP counts- he had a massive trove

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: I'm blown away by Mr. Schulte's complete lack of remorse. He has never once acknowledged his conduct. The CP crimes are the most telling. The trial was a bloodbath. He had no defense. He expressed no remorse.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: He has demonstrated a desire to continue to inflict harm on his enemies. Nothing deters him. Each measure adds fuel to his fire. In the MCC, he tried to leak more information. He declared an Information War on the US

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: He made implied threats in post-trial submissions. There's the discovery laptop, he abused it. He created a 15 gigabyte separate hard drive and loaded on more CP. There is a need to protect the public.

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: Mr. Schulte released it to the world - it is distinguished from the [Reality] Winner case. I'm not going, however, to impose a life sentence...

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: Obviously, I could impose a life sentence here, but I think there is a disconnect with the statutory provisions and the guidelines. Some variance is appropriate. I will vary, yes, on the conditions of confinement. He bought many on himself

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: I previously worked in the Attorney General's office, the decisions on SAMs [Special Administrative Measures] are not made lightly. Any comparison to Nazi concentration camps is to my mind offensive. Their only crime was being Jewish

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: You insinuated I didn't read all of your submission. I read every single one of them, including the ones you filed in Brooklyn. Having said that, the harsh conditions justify a variance from a life sentence. I've written recently - see US v. Chavez

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: The conditions in the SAMs unit are even harsher. I agree it is incumbent on us to treat prisoners humanely. He will be held a long time. I am not persuaded by other defense arguments - the neuro divergence, it is pure speculation

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: He is obviously talented, his computer skills are a testament to that. But starting in 2016 he stole information from the CIA - this continued until now. It took days if not weeks to leak to Wikileaks. His Google searches make it clear

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: The letter from Mr. Schulte's family are moving, particularly his mother's. I don't envy them - the letters don't acknowledge the CP, and when they call him a patriot they ignore what he did. There's a lot his family didn't know

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: Mr. Schulte please rise. You are remanded to the Bureau of Prison for 480 months

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: To be followed by a lifetime of supervised release with the search condition

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: You shall not view CP material including that created by AI

@innercitypress - Inner City Press

Judge Furman: His facility may already have been determined - if not, as close to Lubbock, Texas as possible. Mr. Schulte, you can appeal, you have 14 days. Schulte's counsel: We will be appealing. Judge Furman: We are adjourned. 1st story here: https://www.innercitypress.com/sentencing1schulteicp20124.html

Josh Schulte Gets 40 Years For Wikileaks Vault7 Leak and CP Brutal Kangaroo Detailed TrialsInner City Press: Investigative Reporting from the United Nations Inner City Press' Matthew Russell Lee covers court cases at the SDNY, corruption in the UN, the IMF and community reinvestment. InnerCityPress.com is engaged these days in investigative journalism from the United Nations, including the World Bank, the IMF, the UN Development Program and the five continents. innercitypress.com
TonySeruga
Posted - April 27, 2024 at 11:24 AM
Saved - September 27, 2025 at 9:43 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

And most have never seen this video of Ray Epps, the DIA recruited asset on J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says he was on Constitutional Avenue. 'We went down first. There was four police officers, and some people entered. The gate was taken down, and the second gate was entered. And then went to the third gate.' He mentions 'There were anteaters with us' and notes they were aggressive with the police, 'throwing things, breaking things... hitting our own people.' He asserts they are not violent and do not hate the police department, and that the officers were on their side. From the top of the Capitol steps, he recalls 'thousands of papers behind it' and says it was 'an amazing sight' that made him emotional. He frames the action as symbolic after trying everything the right way, aiming to be visible and to make a point because 'the vote was stolen' and 'If our vote's stolen, what do we have left? A dictator.' He aided an injured man, 'Upper left. Cesar' who wasn't breathing. He suspects Antifa: 'I'm positive because that's how Antifa does things.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this gentleman, just you wanna just describe your the whole situation? Just kinda like where you were in the things? Where were you actually today? I'm gonna flip it around. Is that right? Speaker 1: I was on Constitutional Avenue. Speaker 0: Is that right? Can I flip it on you? Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know. Speaker 0: Okay. Go ahead. Speaker 1: I was on Constitutional Avenue. K. We went down first. There was a few a few of us that got to the gate. There was four police officers, and some people entered. The gate was taken down, and the second gate was entered. And then went to the third gate. There was some anteaters with us, and we didn't know they were anteaters at the same at that time, but Speaker 0: They're pretty aggressive with the police. Speaker 1: Yeah. Pretty aggressive with the police. Were throwing things, breaking things. Speaker 0: That's ridiculous. There was they broke some some Speaker 1: street pipes and fencing down. They were throwing things, hitting our Speaker 0: own people. So people hold on to that thought because people are gonna ask the question, how'd you know they were Antifa? Speaker 1: We didn't know they were Antifa. Speaker 0: At the time. Speaker 1: But they weren't they weren't us. We're we're not violent people. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. That's a good point. Speaker 1: We don't we don't hate the police department police department's on our side. They may not we're taking orders from their boss. We're doing a job. They probably feel the same way we do about this whole thing. But I gotta tell you, when we we got to the top and looked back Speaker 0: The top of? Speaker 1: The top of the steps. Speaker 0: At the Capitol? Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: That's pretty cool. Speaker 1: It was quite an amazing sight. I got a little emotional when I looked back and I saw all the papers behind it. Wow. Thousands of papers behind it. Speaker 0: So what is your thinking? Why why are we going down to the capital at that point? Is it to make sure that we surround just a visual? Are you thinking at that time it's it's kind of a visual thing, or are you actually thinking it's symbolic? What are you thinking? Speaker 1: I think it's symbolic. I I think we have tried everything. We we we've been down there several times. We've done everything the right way. We haven't broken it off. Speaker 0: We I love that. That's true. That's so true. Speaker 1: We you know what? I I've been here before with a million and a half people, and there wasn't a piece of trash left on the ground afterward. There were people there to pick it up and put it away. This is who we are. It's symbolic because we've tried everything Yes. The right way. And they needed to know that we're fed up. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. So you're you're you're saying that you're marching down there and it's it's it's one more thing that we as patriots can do to show those elected officials look. We didn't just come out here to jump around and and yell and scream. We came here to be visible, and we came here to make a point. And that's right where you are. Right? That's exactly what you're saying. You want these guys to know. Exactly. Speaker 1: Exactly right. You sent a message for them because, we are now not a republic. Right. We we don't have a vote in Speaker 0: need. Right. Speaker 1: The vote was stolen. And if our vote's stolen, what do we have left? Right. A dictator. Speaker 0: If anybody can hear this, just make sure that you guys let me know if if you can hear this gentleman. Just message me. Hey. Just yeah, Chris. We can hear loud and clear. So you're you're you get to the top. You don't see any violence other than maybe just the way that these guys were talking to the police. Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No. No. These guys were fighting with the police. They were? They were tearing the things down. They were breaking things. I mean, and we try we were trying to calm them down. And I'm a pretty big guy, so I was able to talk some of them down, but I had some of them that wanted to fight. I'm not gonna fight them. They they were very violent. They were very violent. Were they Antipa? I'm positive because that's how Antipa does things. That's not how we do Speaker 0: things. Mhmm. I don't know. Alright. Speaker 1: Well We tried to talk we had several of us trying to talk them out of it. Speaker 0: And you just basically said that they were they were they wouldn't listen to anything you said? No. Speaker 1: There were certain ones that wouldn't. Most would. They were also throwing things in the air and hitting our own people. Wow. So, yeah, it was pretty crazy. Speaker 0: So they did you see anybody breach the doors to to the capital? Speaker 1: I didn't see the breach. Okay. I didn't see the breach. We had a gentleman go down with an upper left. Speaker 0: Yeah. Cesar. Speaker 1: Upper left. I'm so surprised. Upper left, the seizure. Right. And he wasn't breathing. So when we were up there, before they went in, I had that going on. I helped with that. I helped get him out out of the area, and we had to, carry him out. And it was quite a task while we're here. Speaker 0: So, I mean, you guys yeah. Right? You're scoot down this way. You guys are not antagonizers, obviously, and I mean guys, I mean, I put this gentleman on. I've been talking to him for about thirty minutes, and I'm not gonna put somebody on that I think is a total whack job because, right, we have a message and it's gotta be credible. And this man is telling me that, first of all, when I when I was started talking to them, they said it was clearly Antifa that breached those gates. It was clearly Antifa, and and he really didn't think that they would that the Trump people probably would have walked through the gates had they not been breached first. And so

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

BREAKING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps’ FBI Call to the American Public via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/breaking-federal-agents-drag-j6-political-prisoner-ryan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=breaking-federal-agents-drag-j6-political-prisoner-ryan

DEVELOPING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole and Isolation Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps' FBI Call to the American Public | The Gateway Pundit | by Alicia Powe            Earlier today, Alicia Powe at The Gateway Pundit exposed J6 insurrection leader James Ray Epps lying to the FBI in a leaked interview obtained by The Gateway Pundit. thegatewaypundit.com
FmrRepMattGaetz
Posted - September 26, 2024 at 4:29 PM
Saved - December 26, 2024 at 3:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I submitted my final response to the Ethics Committee, highlighting that their key witness, Joel Greenberg, is a proven liar who has previously attempted to frame others. On July 10, 2024, I provided clear evidence of my innocence, including a jailhouse writing that reveals Greenberg's plot against me, authenticated by former federal agents. Despite this, the Committee continues to pursue their agenda, seemingly intent on removing me from office against the will of my constituents. Consequently, I will no longer engage with this unjust investigation.

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

My final response to the Ethics Committee: https://t.co/iCBR3fyB6D

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

The Committee’s star witness, Joel Greenberg, is a felonious liar who involves others in his lies. On July 10, 2024, I provided the Committee dispositive evidence of my innocence by producing a “smoking gun” contemporaneous, jailhouse writing, documenting the plot to frame me, which includes both Joel Greenberg and his victim. This was authenticated by two former federal agents who interviewed the jailhouse informant who revealed the plot against me. This wasn’t the first - or even second - time Greenberg coordinated false smears of others in this manner. Greenberg was initially indicted for attempting to falsely smear a teacher at a local high school as a pedophile. Thereafter, he was separately found by federal law enforcement to have possessed child pornography that he intended to use to frame his OWN attorney.

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

Greenberg had arranged for his victim to meet with an attorney of Greenberg’s choosing to orchestrate the plan to get Greenberg’s victim to lie about me. Greenberg texted another person that he was paying for his victim’s attorneys. https://t.co/BS5UlBPXaC

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

After the text messages admitting Greenberg was paying for his victim’s attorneys, he confessed his lies to a jailhouse informant, who he was sharing a holding cell with in 2021. This jailhouse informant sent a letter to my attorneys confirming Greenberg: · ADMITTED authorities found records that he gave money to a 17-year-old on AND that he was charged with sex trafficking a minor. · ADMITTED to fabricating NUMEROUS EVENTS that he told investigators, including claiming that he arranged for a minor to “hook up” with other people. · Said investigators leaked the charges to the media. · Wanted to “help the feds” to get his time reduced.

@FmrRepMattGaetz - Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

However, NONE of this has been enough for the Committee. It seems the fix is in. Their investigation exists to do what the voters of my district won’t - remove me from office. Therefore, I will no longer voluntarily participate in this regrettable abuse of the Committee.

DschlopesIsBack
Posted - November 28, 2024 at 2:03 AM
Saved - November 28, 2024 at 3:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been diving deep into the actions of Ray Epps before, during, and after January 6th. Starting with his attempts to incite Trump supporters to enter the Capitol, I’ve noted how he was present during key moments, including whispering to Ryan Samsel, who has faced severe consequences as a political prisoner. Despite the scrutiny others faced, Epps has received unusual support from the Left and mainstream media. I’ve highlighted inconsistencies in his testimony and the FBI's involvement, raising questions about his role that seem to go unchallenged. More insights to come soon.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The Full Truth About Ray Epps After his failed defamation suit against Fox News it's now safe to fully expose this man for all that he's done before, on and after January 6th. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/oU3TmZmKj0

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

"We need to go IN to the Capitol!" This is a good place to start with Ray Epps. The damning video starts on the night of January 5th, when Epps tries to incite Trump supports to go into the Capitol the next day. They respond by saying "Nooo!!" before chanting "Fed! Fed! Fed!" https://t.co/5Yj2e1hIrn

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to go into the capital tomorrow. It's crucial. No violence, just a peaceful approach. I hesitate to mention it because of potential consequences. But we have to make our presence known. Shut up, older generation. We didn't actually go into the capital; that was unexpected.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. We're hanging on. Into the capital. What? No. No. No. No. No. No. Peacefully. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Tomorrow. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Face Fed posting? We didn't go into the capital. I didn't see that coming. Okay.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Next you can see Ray Epps in action on January 6th telling people "we are going to the Capitol, where are problems are." Then you will see him whispering something into the ear of Ryan Samsel right before Samsel and others charge the barrier with Ray Epps right there behind them. https://t.co/naTZGVPED6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president isn't addressing us, so we're heading to the capital where our issues lie. Spread the word. Should we go out there? No, we might get arrested. Are we risking arrest? Yes, but we don't want to get shot. Should we all be arrested?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The president is not speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Please spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, should we go out there? No. When we go in Are we gonna get arrested for this, Sam? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The aforementioned Ryan Samsel (who Ray Epps whispered into the ear of in my previous post) has been a political prisoner for years now spending tons of time in solitary confinement and has been beaten and assaulted while in federal prison.

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

Abused J6 Political Prisoner Begs Those Listening to Vote for Trump: “My Life and So Many Others Depend on This Election… It’s So Important” | @jimhoft_ January 6 political prisoner Ryan Samsel called The Gateway Pundit on Sunday. Ryan urged all decent Americans to vote for President Trump for President of the United States.

Video Transcript AI Summary
我们都是个体，但每个人的经历和看法都不同。虽然我们共享一些共同点，但每个人的故事和感受都是独特的。这种多样性使我们能够从不同的角度理解世界，促进了交流和理解。重要的是要尊重彼此的差异，因为这正是我们共同生活的基础。 We are all individuals, but each person's experiences and perspectives are different. While we share some commonalities, everyone's story and feelings are unique. This diversity allows us to understand the world from different angles, fostering communication and understanding. It is important to respect each other's differences, as this is the foundation of our shared existence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 话 我 们 就 是 一 个 人 的 话 我 们 的 人 都 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 都 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 的 一 个 人 都 是 不 是 我 们 的 人 的 事 情 是 我 们 的 人 的 事 情 是 我 们 的 事 情 不 是 我 们 的 事 情 不 是 我 们 的 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 我 们 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 样 的 人 我 们 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 样 的

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Despite all this, you might find it VERY odd that the ONLY person involved in January 6th that the Left and the mainstream media have staunchly defended is Ray Epps. They wanted the book thrown at anybody else that was even present at the Capitol that day. https://t.co/qTWIYgtDjn

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

I'm even got to the point where 60 Minutes did a fluff piece interview trying to help Ray Epps clear his name from this "conspiracy theory." https://t.co/ft05NVQyjz

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Where did these alleged Ray Epps federal agent "conspiracy theories" come from? Well, directly from the FBI themselves. Early on Epps was put on an FBI watch list before quickly being removed, without explanation. https://t.co/U9eWYy3dl8

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The official FBI Washington Field Office account also made this "Seeking Information" post where Ray Epps can clearly be seen in the yellow square below. Oddly enough this post is STILL up today as the pinned post for @FBIWFO 🤔 https://t.co/PwzcTLk03l

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO Here was Trump's expected new FBI Director Kash Patel discussing Ray Epps with @Timcast "Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day and the next day he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens: You die... or you're an informant." https://t.co/mmv1xjWDJV

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is reasonable suspicion that federal agents were involved in the January 6th events, supported by a video showing an individual with an earpiece directing people into the building. Additionally, Ray Epps was briefly on the FBI's most wanted list, raising questions about his status as either deceased or an informant. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, head of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, was asked about federal agents' involvement and stated she couldn't answer at that time. This evasiveness suggests a potential cover-up, as a definitive "no" would have been expected if there were no agents involved.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents, there's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of riots, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen. Speaker 1: I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Alright. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. Only 2 ways that happens, you die or your informant. Put that aside under congressional testimony. Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI Counterintelligence Division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, spit flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6th? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time. Not if the answer was definitively no, having been a DOJ FBI guy myself, she would have gone there and said, nope. Absolutely not. The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Rustler, gave us Christopher Steele, Halper, and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and I'm sure they were there. Speaker 0: You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yep. And that would compromise whatever their Speaker 1: operation was. Exactly.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO @Timcast If you're enjoying this thread and content please feel to give me a follow @DschlopesIsBack and turn on notifications for my posts. I sometimes post humor and satire but I also cover very serious topics like this and do deep dives to expose evil people and agendas. https://t.co/TueRrqSyXw

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO @Timcast Now we get to the Jan. 6th Committee and this is where things get even more interesting. Notice how the shame panel was already "seeking to debunk unfounded theory about F.B.I. role in riot" BEFORE interviewing Epps? Seems just a bit biased... https://t.co/om2wyLm05l

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO @Timcast The January 6th Committee asked Ray Epps about texting his nephew "I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it." What did Epps mean by this, according to him it was just "helping people get there." 🤡 https://t.co/1VUWPrXdhm

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO @Timcast The Jan. 6th Committee didn't even bother challenging Ray Epps claiming that the video of him the night before on January 5th (see my first post in this thread) was him trying to "deescalate" a group of people. Imagine watching that video and thinking this is what happened. 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/QjDG8IgHfU

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO @Timcast Don't worry, hardened marine veteran Ray Epps only wanted to be in the front lines on his way to go into the Capitol because he was... cold. https://t.co/67pK1TBhZk

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@FBIWFO @Timcast Ray Epps testified to the Jan. 6th Committee that he left the Capitol at 2:12pm but he actually left at 2:54pm. This is lying under oath, right?

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Ray Epps left @uscapitol at 2:54pm He testified to @January6thCmte that he left ~ 2:12pm In the time gap, Epps hit by CS gas, breached 3rd police line at 2:27pm, helped corner cops in retreat & hit by CS again at 2:35pm Then helps Proud Boy; PB now has sweetheart @USAO_DC deal

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

"We're here to storm the Capitol" - Ray Epps I should have put this earlier in the thread. It's from "The Rest of the Story with Lara Logan: Insurrection vs FedSurrection: Part One." This is a great January 6th documentary by @laralogan https://t.co/pufJDWF9If

Video Transcript AI Summary
He leaned in and whispered, "We're here to serve the capital," before the events of January 6th unfolded. This moment raised questions about Reyes, especially after he reportedly said to "storm the capital." Investigators analyzed audio and video to confirm the accuracy of his words, which had not been altered. Despite extensive research through various sources, including footage and FBI documents, there was little discussion about Reyes' statements. On January 6th, he directed people toward the Capitol but did not enter himself. He has not publicly clarified his comments or intentions regarding the Capitol. The lack of attention to Reyes' story remains puzzling.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then he leaned in and whispered something he apparently did not want to say out loud. We're not here to fight, ma'am. We're here to man. Here to I'm not kidding. We're here to serve the capital. Hell, yeah. Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe, Owen. Be safe, brother. That one moment changed what we knew about Reyes that night when he whispered, storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Of supporters of president Trump stormed the US Capitol building, thousands storming the Capitol this mob that stormed the Capitol stormed the Capitol stormed the cap Stormed the Capitol. Stormed the US Capitol building. Stormed the United States Capitol. We ran it through forensic software that technical investigators use for analyzing audio and video to make sure we heard correctly, and it had not been altered. We're here to serve the capital. Hell, yeah. Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe. And search through hours of footage, countless news stories, Epps' FBI case documents, and his deposition before the January 6th committee to see if it had been discussed. With the exception of one writer we found on substack, it hadn't. On your heels. Is just speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Epps, who continued to direct people to the capital in the cold light of day on January 6th, did not go into the capital himself according to the January 6th committee and the FBI. He's never explained publicly why he said storm the capital, what he meant by that, or what he may have known. Alright. So why hasn't it been addressed? Nobody cared about the Rayap story.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

@laralogan I appreciate all of you that have checked out the thread so far. Thanks for all of the likes, comments and shares to help spread the word! Still have more to add to this tomorrow but will be taking a short break from it for now.

BasedSamParker
Posted - March 2, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 8:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it odd that Collin Rugg and Danielle D'Souza Gill attended the Epstein Binder meeting but haven't mentioned it at all. Did they get invited to the White House to keep secrets? Also, why has Danielle never tweeted about Epstein, yet calls for censorship of Muslims criticizing Israel?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🇺🇸🇮🇱 EPSTEIN BINDER UPDATE: Who else thinks it's strange that Twitter star Collin Rugg & congressional wife Danielle D'Souza Gill both attended the Epstein Binder meeting but haven't tweeted one word about it? Were they invited to the White House to keep secrets from us? And why hasn't Danielle ever tweeted about Epstein even once--yet has managed to call for censorship of Muslims who criticize Israel?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🇺🇸🇮🇱 JACK POSOBIEC EXPOSED While you stare at Jack proudly holding his Epstein binder, never forget that he is an intelligence operative who honeymooned in israel. Why do you think he participated in this charade? https://t.co/74fbJOaW8g

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

🇺🇸🇮🇱 MIKE BENZ EXPOSED: In the last 24 hours, Benz has deflected blame for Epstein onto SDNY, Obama, Biden, the State Dept., the CIA, the DOD, the FBI & even former Attorney General Bill Barr! IOW, everyone/anyone that isn't israel or Mossad. This tells you everything you need… https://t.co/bytAmYDGsJ

julie_kelly2
Posted - March 18, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Saved - March 18, 2025 at 10:11 PM

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

I knew I had the Ray Epps sentencing transcript--just found it. In Jan 2024, Judge Boasberg again referred to Jan 6 as an "insurrection" by Trump supporters--and implied the president was responsible. He gave Epps a slap on the wrist by lamenting his alleged victim status: https://t.co/gTN54JV4ww

MikeBenzCyber
Posted - March 18, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Saved - March 18, 2025 at 10:11 PM

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

You really have to read every line of this screenshot below to re-familiarize yourself with what a mind-boggling, fart-huffing, glue-sniffing act of judicial jiu jitsu Judge Boasberg used to let Ray Epps off

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

I knew I had the Ray Epps sentencing transcript--just found it. In Jan 2024, Judge Boasberg again referred to Jan 6 as an "insurrection" by Trump supporters--and implied the president was responsible. He gave Epps a slap on the wrist by lamenting his alleged victim status: https://t.co/gTN54JV4ww

its_The_Dr
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 8:39 PM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Judge Boasberg protected Ray Epps? He gave Ray probation while locking everyone else up. That is why it is important for Kash to tell Americans once and for all if Ray Epps was a federal asset on Jan 6th. https://t.co/RtHB2SjUNP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, there is a need to go into the capital. The speaker hesitated to say it, fearing arrest. The speaker then stated the need to go into the capital.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? No. Peacefully. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Base fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay.
its_The_Dr
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 2:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on Judge Boasberg's decision to grant Ray Epps probation while others faced harsher penalties, raising questions about Epps's potential status as a federal asset during the January 6th events. One participant emphasizes the need for transparency regarding the incident, referencing Dan Bongino's long-standing critiques and expressing hope for forthcoming revelations in the near future.

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Judge Boasberg protected Ray Epps? He gave Ray probation while locking everyone else up. That is why it is important for Kash to tell Americans once and for all if Ray Epps was a federal asset on Jan 6th. https://t.co/RtHB2SjUNP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, there is a need to go into the capital. The speaker hesitated to say it, fearing arrest. The speaker then stated, "We need to go...to the capital."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? No. Peacefully. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Base fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay.

@Pre666_ - triple six

@its_The_Dr @someonesom47381 Too many issues with that day. Where is my radical transparency? You know, Dan bongino has been railing on the radio about this stuff for years, so I would expect to see something within the next handful of months... 🤞 https://t.co/1qn9mIDGwG

EricaRN4USA
Posted - March 30, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 2:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It keeps getting deeper. Ray Epps, accused of being an undercover FBI agent during the January 6 Capitol riots, was seen on video encouraging people to enter the Capitol. While others faced harsher penalties, he received a year of probation and a $500 fine. The judge, James Boasberg, noted Epps had been run out of his home and town.

@EricaRN4USA - Erica 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

So it keeps getting deeper. Ray Epps who was accused of being an undercover agent for the FBI on January 6 capitol riots. He was captured on video encouraging people to go into the capitol. While many were convicted of a lesser offense, the judge in Epps’ case gave Epps a years probation and a $500 fine. The judge said that he had been ran out of home and ran out of town. The judge? James Boasberg

RealRyanNichols
Posted - April 14, 2025 at 8:31 PM
Saved - April 15, 2025 at 12:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing my experience of betrayal by two individuals, Marcus DiPaola and 1%Watchdog, who I trusted during my hurricane rescue efforts. I now believe they were working as informants, setting me up for the events of January 6, 2021. Marcus, an admitted FBI informant, was present at key events and manipulated situations to build my profile. After the chaos at the Capitol, I discovered evidence of their involvement and the government's cover-up. I urge everyone to share my story and demand justice for those misled by these individuals.

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

🚨 Patriots, brace yourselves. This is the J6 entrapment story the feds DON’T want you to hear. I’m a Marine who risked everything to save lives during hurricanes. But two men I trusted—Marcus DiPaola and 1%Watchdog—set me up for YEARS, from 2018 to the Capitol chaos. Marcus? An admitted FBI informant who was at Sandy Hook, Ferguson, Ebola, my viral dog rescue, AND J6. 1%Watchdog? He directed us on Zello, got Oath Keepers convicted, but the feds won’t name him. I believe they were a fed team working to trap me. Today, I’m dropping PROOF that’ll expose this government cover-up. Going to drop each thread about 10 minutes apart starting NOW, and then after the thread is complete, I will continue adding evidence including motions and court docs tomorrow. Share this now—let’s demand justice! 🔥 #J6Entrapment #PatriotBetrayed #ExposeTheFeds

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

🌊 Let’s go back to September 2018, Hurricane Florence. I’m out there saving lives, coordinated by 1%Watchdog on Zello. We’d been working together since Hurricane Harvey in 2017—I trusted him like a brother. He sends me to a specific neighborhood in North Carolina. Guess who’s waiting? Marcus DiPaola, flashing a White House press badge. I’m a Marine—honor means everything. Marcus hands me a challenge coin, a symbol of brotherhood. I thought, “This guy’s legit.” But I was wrong… #SetupBegins #FedsInDisguise #HurricaneHeroes

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

🐾 Still in Florence, 1%Watchdog sends us all to Leland, North Carolina. I’m pulling people and dogs out of floodwaters—doing what Marines do. Marcus and his buddy, who claimed to be with Reuters, are filming everything. The dog rescue Marcus captured? It went VIRAL. That video landed me on the Ellen DeGeneres show, made me a hero to millions. I thought Marcus was just a journalist helping out. But now I see it—he and 1%Watchdog were building my profile. For what? I’d find out on January 6, 2021… #ViralSetup #EllenMoment #PatriotTrap

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

🕵️‍♂️ Let’s talk about Marcus DiPaola. This guy’s been at EVERY major event. Sandy Hook 2012. Ferguson 2014. Ebola in Chicago 2014. San Jose Trump protests in 2016, where he called 911. And then he’s with ME in Leland, NC, 2018. Here’s the kicker: Marcus admitted in 2020 that he became an FBI informant in January 2016, working until 2019. He even asked the FBI to tap his phone, email, Twitter, everything. This was DURING our hurricane rescues. Was he watching me? Reporting on me? I think so. Don’t believe me? Keep scrolling for PROOF! #SerialOperative #FBIInformant #Everywhere

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

⚠️ Fast forward to late 2020, weeks before J6. Marcus messages/calls me out of the blue: “Bring body armor. Gas mask too. Counter-protesters will be there.” How did he KNOW? He said he’d be filming at the Capitol after Trump’s speech. Meanwhile, 1%Watchdog—my rescue partner—had turned political. He pushed me and Oath Keepers to go to DC. He’d been on Zello since 2019, tracked by journalist Micah Loewinger, who knew militias like Oath Keepers were active there. I didn’t see it then, but they were setting the stage. You saw it before I did. #Foreknowledge #J6Setup #PatriotPawns

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

📹 January 6, 2021. I’m on the West Terrace of the Capitol, caught up in the chaos. I was part of a Zello channel that 1%Watchdog added me to, but I wasn’t active in it that afternoon—I can prove it. Still, here’s what 1%Watchdog did: At 2 PM, he makes his channel public. Micah Loewinger records him urging listeners to storm the Capitol, make citizen’s arrests, even kill in self-defense. Marcus? He’s BEHIND police lines, filming as barricades come down. Oath Keepers like Jessica Watkins and Holden Haney got charged with conspiracy using 1%Watchdog’s Zello audio. Stewart Rhodes got 18 years for seditious conspiracy in 2023. But Marcus and 1%Watchdog? Untouched. I say they were a fed team—Marcus filming, 1%Watchdog directing others. #J6Chaos #FedOperation #DoubleStandard

Video Transcript AI Summary
Police are squabbling with protesters. The protesters reached the capital again.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Police are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go. And they just reached the capital again. Police are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go. And they just reached the capital again.

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

💔 After J6, the betrayal hit hard. I found a redacted FBI letter in my discovery: “I know he was there. Here’s his number. Don’t say I snitched.” That was Marcus. I knew because he added specifics that could only lead back to being him. And the worst part? He asked them not to expose his identify as a CHS because in his words, “I may have to work with him again..” The man who gave me a challenge coin—a Marine symbol I’d die for and saved lives together for—snitched on me to the FBI. WAS THE FBI! 1%Watchdog? He called J6ers “terrorists,” flipping on us like a fed pawn. But I say Marcus was an undercover asset, and 1%Watchdog was his partner, luring us into a trap. This betrayal cuts deep. #EntrapmentProof #J6Betrayal #MarineHonor

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

🔍 The feds are hiding the truth. Sundance from The Last Refuge was told they KNOW 1%Watchdog’s identity but to “drop it.” The J6 committee used 1%Watchdog’s Zello audio to convict Oath Keepers—but never named him. My legal filing names Marcus, 1%Watchdog, Ray Epps, and others as suspected informants or agitators, demanding FBI files. The feds won’t release them—why? Enrique Tarrio got 22 years for “planning” J6, despite not being in DC. 1%Watchdog did the same on Zello—yet still walks free! I say they’re fed tools. #FedCoverUp #SelectiveJustice #J6Truth

@TheLastRefuge2 - TheLastRefuge

There are goofy people, and there are feds. Sometimes they mix. True Story: The same user who tried to set me up, a guy using "1%Watchdog" as a user id on Twitter (who is almost positively a fed), was the same person who organized a midnight meetup in a garage in Washington DC on Jan 5, 2021, with 4 members of the Oathkeepers. The Oathkeepers all showed up, but the guy (likely a fed) who organized the meeting did not show up. None of the 4 being controlled had any suspicions about their seemingly random midnight garage meeting. The rest is history. Like I said. There are goofy people, and there are feds. Sometimes in the games they play, they intermix. I put this Ven fellow in that category. Nothing more.

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

⚖️ Journalist Steve Baker was indicted in 2024 for J6 reporting—charged with interstate racketeering for just being there. Marcus? He filmed breaches, was with crowds spraying cops, and walked free. 1%Watchdog? His Zello audio convicted Oath Keepers, but the feds claim they “don’t know” him. My legal filing says the government might be shielding CHSs through Sedition Hunters or other agencies. This isn’t justice—it’s a government cover-up. And this? This is Douglas Brasher, the AUSA who withheld this info, protecting Marcus and 1%Watchdog. #DoubleStandard #J6Injustice #PatriotsPersecuted

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

🧨 Christmas Eve 2024, I’m in prison… An anonymous X message comes to my inbox.. Marcus’s archived 2020 thread where he ADMITS he was an FBI informant from 2016 to 2019! 😳 👉 https://archive.ph/jYVkv That’s the EXACT time I was working with him and 1%Watchdog during the hurricanes. He set me up from Florence to J6, and I believe 1%Watchdog was his partner in this fed trap. Tomorrow, I’m dropping screenshots, dates, archives—everything. Share this thread. Demand justice for patriots betrayed by these snakes. No more government cover-ups! The government knew about this and told me it didn’t exist. Furthermore, they shamed me for even suggesting Marcus worked as an undercover. I caught so much flack because I was over the target the whole time. As @McBrideLawNYC and I proved time and time again.. We were RIGHT about EVERYTHING! 💣 #ExposeTheFeds #J6Truth #DemandJustice

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

📢 Patriots, I need you. I’ve laid out the truth—Marcus DiPaola and 1%Watchdog betrayed me, betrayed us all. They used my honor as a Marine, my hurricane rescues, my viral moment on Ellen, to set me up for J6. The feds are protecting them, but we can’t let this stand. Share this thread EVERYWHERE. Tag influencers, news outlets, anyone who’ll listen. The coming days court and documents proof will blow this wide open. Let’s force the truth out—together. 🇺🇸 #J6Entrapment #PatriotFight #ViralBombshell

C_3C_3
Posted - September 26, 2025 at 11:10 AM
Saved - September 27, 2025 at 9:06 AM

@C_3C_3 - C3

Did you know Judge Boasberg protected Ray Epps? He gave Ray probation while locking everyone else up. That’s why it’s important for Americans to once and for all know if Epps was a fed asset on Jan 6th. (Hint: he was) It would unravel the entire operation. Getting close… https://t.co/UNvVUI2lOV

DschlopesIsBack
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Saved - September 29, 2025 at 3:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been diving deep into the actions of Ray Epps surrounding January 6th. It’s alarming to see him inciting people to storm the Capitol, yet he faced minimal consequences compared to others. He even admitted to “orchestrating” events in a text to his nephew, which the media largely ignored. Despite being on an FBI watch list, he was quickly removed, raising suspicions about his role. The Jan. 6th Committee seemed biased in their investigation, failing to challenge Epps effectively. His testimony also contained discrepancies, further complicating the narrative.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The FULL Truth About Ray Epps After learning that nearly 300 FBI agents were present at the Capitol, it’s a perfect time expose this man for all that he did before, on and after January 6th. Kash Patel REALLY needs to do a full investigation into this. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/9jc5yeqzUB

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

"We need to go IN to the Capitol!" This is a good place to start with Ray Epps. The damning video starts on the night of January 5th, when Epps tries to incite Trump supports to go into the Capitol the next day. They respond by saying "Nooo!!" before chanting "Fed! Fed! Fed!" https://t.co/0nwVDAxx18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers discuss going into the capital tomorrow, insisting on a plan despite hesitation. They oscillate between urgency and caution: "Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital" and "I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested." They try to keep the rhetoric "Peaceful" and "Fed" in the mix, then confirm aloud: "We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright." A sharply cut interjection—"Shut the fuck up, Uber"—is followed by: "To the capital." They label it as "Based Fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital." The exchange ends with a resigned acknowledgment: "I didn't see that coming in. Okay."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? No. Peaceful. Fed. Fed. Fed. Fed. Tomorrow, Fed. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, Uber. To the capital. Based Fed posting? Yeah. Need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Next you can see Ray Epps in action on Jan. 6th telling people "we are going to the Capitol, where are problems are." Then you will see him whispering something into the ear of Ryan Samsel right before Samsel and others charge the barrier with Ray Epps right there behind them. https://t.co/Nt2ZY25ZWO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Monument Hill. 'President is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. We spread the word.' The speaker notes the plan to move toward the capital to address issues and spread the message. 'Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there?' They then ask for permission to advance and discuss possible entry. 'No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested when go up there?' The exchange continues with concern about violence, as they respond, 'Yeah. You don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?' today.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Monument Hill. President is good speaking. We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. We spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go up there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested when go up there? Yeah. You don't need to get shot. Arrest us all?

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The aforementioned Ryan Samsel (who Ray Epps whispered into the ear of in my previous post) has been a political prisoner for years now spending tons of time in solitary confinement and has been beaten and assaulted while in federal prison. Epps, on the other hand, was not.

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

Abused J6 Political Prisoner Begs Those Listening to Vote for Trump: “My Life and So Many Others Depend on This Election… It’s So Important” | @jimhoft_ January 6 political prisoner Ryan Samsel called The Gateway Pundit on Sunday. Ryan urged all decent Americans to vote for President Trump for President of the United States.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "This call is from a federal prison. My life and somebody else's lives depend on this select upcoming election. It's so important that people go out and vote. Ray Epps had set me up at the front gate. My codefendants all went home except one, and I'm still sitting here. I've literally given my home. I've given my health. I was assaulted because of the fact that I wasn't plead guilty and turned off Trump. I've lost my father, I've lost everything. This is my only chance of getting out. Please, guys, help help us out, please." Speaker 1: "There's a lot of people out here who support you, and our prayers are with you." Speaker 0: "I gotta go." Speaker 0: "I love you guys." Speaker 0: "Please, you know, support us." Speaker 0: "I love you all." Speaker 0: "God bless."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, hey, Jim. It's Ryan Samson calling from MDC Brooklyn. Just want to reach out to the gateway readers and let them know how important this election is for a lot of us, you know, in the jail, not even just the Gen sixers, the inmates in general. Everybody here in New York and every jail that I've been through, every day, shockingly, I've seen a turnaround at every single inmate wants Trump to win, especially us. Know, our lives depend on the gym. Don't need particular and locked up ever since Ray Epps had set me up at the front gate. My codefendants all went home except one, and I'm still sitting here. And, literally, my This call is from a federal prison. My life and somebody else's lives depend on this select upcoming election. It's so important that people go out and vote. And if you can bring somebody with you to vote because, literally, we've given everything. You know, I've I've literally given my my home. I've given my health. I mean, Jim, I think your readers know that I was assaulted because of the fact that I wasn't plead guilty and turned off Trump. In in the time I've I've lost my father, I've I've lost everything. I I I as I speak to you, Jim, I don't even have an attorney. Like, I my my weirdest self can quit. So I'm I'm waiting to go fight, and and everything in the next week counts on this vote. And I thank you guys, please, please, please, please go out and vote, and it's so important. I mean, so many people gave everything for this and were left with nothing to to just your vote. So, yeah, I might as thank you. You know, I appreciate you giving me a voice and being pleased, guys. You know, spread this spread this around. Literally, our our you know, I have nothing left. I mean, it it I'd rather be homeless than sit in this place. You know, I've I've lost everything, so I'd rather be homeless on a street before I spend another day in here. This is my only chance of getting out. So please, guys, help help us out, please. Thank you. Speaker 1: Thanks, Ryan. That's very moving. Appreciate it. And there's a lot of people out here who support you, and our prayers are with you. And we agree this is gonna be life or death for a lot of Americans right now. We can't continue to have this oppressive regime destroying our lives. Speaker 0: I don't I don't think like like, you know, like I said, I don't think people get it. Like, literally, our our like, there's people that are dying in this, you know, cancer. I mean, myself with the precancerous node on my chest, you know, they finally after all this time, they are scheduling me for a surgery, but it it took to the point now where it's almost irreversible. There's so many others that our our lives literally depend on this. So please, guys, get as many votes out there as you can, please. Thank you, Jim. I gotta go. I love you guys. Please, you know, support us. I love you all. Speaker 1: Thank you, Ryan. God bless.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Then you have Ray Epps LITERALLY admitting that he “orchestrated it” in a text message to his nephew. This was completely glossed over by the January 6th committee and the media. https://t.co/UmXP67d1zW

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

This was shortly before Ray Epps texted his nephew that he “orchestrated it.” He certainly looks like a man proud of what he… orchestrated.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Here is Ray Epps gleefully admiring the work that he claimed to have “orchestrated” at the Capitol on January 6th, 2021. He’s like a kid in a candy store. Or a Fed during a false flag… https://t.co/whPDVDS83y

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Despite all this, you might find it VERY odd that the ONLY person involved in January 6th that the Left and the mainstream media have staunchly defended is Ray Epps. They wanted the book thrown at anybody else that was even present at the Capitol that day… just not Mr. Epps. https://t.co/OEK6J7Vtpx

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

I’ll be adding more below but if you’re enjoying this thread feel free to give me a follow @dschlopesisback and turn on notifications. I sometimes post humor but I also cover very serious topics and posts threads like this as well. If not, no worries and thanks for reading! https://t.co/nstFjsKpSc

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

It even got to the point where 60 Minutes did a fluff piece interview trying to help Ray Epps clear his name from this alleged “conspiracy theory." Again, the media defending him and only him is far beyond suspicious. https://t.co/07Vn7T6wyF

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Ray Epps ONLY ended up being prosecuted due to people like us exposing him. What was he sentenced to? Only a year of probation… a very, very small slap on the wrist. Do you know who is Judge was? None other than the infamous James Boasberg. https://t.co/oAiGiSPJzs

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Now, where did these alleged Ray Epps is federal agent "conspiracy theories" come from? Well, directly from the FBI themselves. Early on Epps was put on an FBI watch list before quickly being removed, without explanation. https://t.co/llfOprY1Wf

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The official FBI Washington Field Office account also made this "Seeking Information" post where Ray Epps can clearly be seen in the yellow square below. Oddly enough, this post is STILL up as the pinned post for @FBIWFO up until a few months ago. Epps is pointed out in yellow. https://t.co/VfgngAQJ7A

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Here was now FBI Director Kash Patel discussing Ray Epps with @Timcast. "Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day and the next day he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens: You die... or you're an informant." https://t.co/D5tqs1tKQb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen. Speaker 1: I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant. Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time. Not if the answer was definitively no, having been a DOJ FBI guy myself, she would have gone there and said, nope. Absolutely not. The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there. Speaker 0: You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their Speaker 1: operation was. Exactly.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Now we circle back around to the corrupt Jan. 6th Committee and this is where things get even more interesting… Notice how the sham panel was already "seeking to debunk unfounded theory about F.B.I. role in riot" BEFORE interviewing Epps? Seems just a bit biased and odd… https://t.co/qSOoZeRYbE

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The Jan. 6th Committee didn't even bother challenging Ray Epps claiming that the video of him the night before on January 5th (see my first post in this thread) was him trying to "deescalate" a group of people. Imagine watching that video and thinking this is what happened… https://t.co/wkmo4Dfojf

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Don't worry, hardened marine veteran Ray Epps only wanted to be in the front lines on his way to go into the Capitol because he was... cold. The Jan. 6th committee actually believed this. 🤡 https://t.co/oiSZfv6qwi

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

"We're here to storm the Capitol" - Ray Epps I should have put this post earlier in the thread. It's from "The Rest of the Story with Lara Logan: Insurrection vs FedSurrection: Part One." This is a great January 6th documentary by @laralogan https://t.co/aUSYoN8fa0

Video Transcript AI Summary
That one moment changed what we knew about Ray Epps that night when he whispered storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Of supporters of president Trump stormed The US Capitol Building. We ran it through forensic software that technical investigators use for analyzing audio and video to make sure we heard correctly, and it had not been altered. Epps, who continued to direct people to the capital in the cold light of day on January 6, did not go into the capital himself, according to the January 6 committee and the FBI. He's never explained publicly why he said storm the capital, what he meant by that, or what he may have known. So why hasn't it been addressed? Nobody cared about the Ray Epp story.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then he leaned in and whispered something he apparently did not want to say out loud. Speaker 1: We're not here to fight, man. We're here to I'm not kidding. We're here to storm the capital. Hell yeah. Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe, boy. The job change. Be safe, brother. Speaker 0: That one moment changed what we knew about Ray Epps that night when he whispered storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Speaker 1: Of supporters of president Trump stormed The US Capitol Building. Thousands storming the Capitol. Speaker 0: This mob that stormed the Capitol. Stormed the Capitol. Speaker 1: Stormed the capital. Stormed the Stormed The US Capital Building. Speaker 0: Stormed The United States Capital. We ran it through forensic software that technical investigators use for analyzing audio and video to make sure we heard correctly, and it had not been altered. I'm Speaker 1: not kidding. We're here to serve the capital. Hell yeah. Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe. Speaker 0: And search through hours of footage, countless news stories, Epps' FBI case documents, and his deposition before the January 6 committee to see if it had been discussed. With the exception of one rider we found on Substack, it hadn't. Speaker 1: Problems are. It's that direction. Speaker 0: Epps, who continued to direct people to the capital in the cold light of day on January 6, did not go into the capital himself, according to the January 6 committee and the FBI. He's never explained publicly why he said storm the capital, what he meant by that, or what he may have known. So why hasn't it been addressed? Speaker 1: Nobody cared about the Ray Epp story.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

It’s also important to note that Epps testified to the Jan. 6th Committee that he left the Capitol at 2:12pm but he actually left at 2:54pm. This is straight-up lying under oath, right?

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Ray Epps left @uscapitol at 2:54pm He testified to @January6thCmte that he left ~ 2:12pm In the time gap, Epps hit by CS gas, breached 3rd police line at 2:27pm, helped corner cops in retreat & hit by CS again at 2:35pm Then helps Proud Boy; PB now has sweetheart @USAO_DC deal

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@ryanjreilly Thanks @HelpStopHate for sharing a higher res video of Ray Epps exiting @uscapitol grounds carrying James Davis Time stamp says 2:54pm would be exit Told the phone was from Texas, which would likely be CST, but almost every provider auto switches to local, thus EST

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tear gas. He's fighting tear gas. That's right. He's fighting tear gas right now, guys. If you guys can donate a water or two, please give it to them. Straight ahead. Straight ahead. Guys, we need to continue to move forward. Move forward. Keep moving forward up the steps. We will occupy the entire capital, always the capital. Keep moving
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh. I can't. Out. Get out. Okay. That's the prime of Harrison here. That's awesome. Tear gas. He's fighting tear gas. That's right. He's fighting tear gas right now, guys. If you guys can donate a water or two, please give it to them. Straight ahead. Straight ahead. Straight ahead. Guys, we need to continue to move forward. Move forward. Keep moving forward up the steps. We will occupy the entire capital, always the capital. Keep moving
DschlopesIsBack
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Saved - September 29, 2025 at 3:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation centers on Ray Epps and the presence of nearly 300 FBI agents at the Capitol on January 6th. One participant emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation by Kash Patel into Epps' actions before, during, and after the event. Another participant points out that Epps testified to the January 6th Committee that he left the Capitol at 2:12 PM, but evidence suggests he actually left at 2:54 PM, raising concerns about potential perjury.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

The FULL Truth About Ray Epps After learning that nearly 300 FBI agents were present at the Capitol, it’s a perfect time expose this man for all that he did before, on and after January 6th. Kash Patel REALLY needs to do a full investigation into this. 🧵THREAD https://t.co/9jc5yeqzUB

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

It’s also important to note that Epps testified to the Jan. 6th Committee that he left the Capitol at 2:12pm but he actually left at 2:54pm. This is straight-up lying under oath, right?

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Ray Epps left @uscapitol at 2:54pm He testified to @January6thCmte that he left ~ 2:12pm In the time gap, Epps hit by CS gas, breached 3rd police line at 2:27pm, helped corner cops in retreat & hit by CS again at 2:35pm Then helps Proud Boy; PB now has sweetheart @USAO_DC deal

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@ryanjreilly Thanks @HelpStopHate for sharing a higher res video of Ray Epps exiting @uscapitol grounds carrying James Davis Time stamp says 2:54pm would be exit Told the phone was from Texas, which would likely be CST, but almost every provider auto switches to local, thus EST

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker announces: "Oh. I can't. Out. Get out. Okay." Then notes: "That's the prime of Harrison here. That's awesome." The scene references "Tear gas" and asserts: "He's fighting tear gas" and repeats: "He's fighting tear gas right now, guys." The speaker calls for help: "If you guys can donate a water or two, please give it to them." The crowd is urged forward: "Straight ahead. Straight ahead." Additional direction: "Guys, we need to continue to move forward. Move forward. Keep moving forward up the steps." The group declares their objective: "We will occupy the entire capital, always the capital." The exhortation ends with: "Keep moving"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh. I can't. Out. Get out. Okay. That's the prime of Harrison here. That's awesome. Tear gas. He's fighting tear gas. That's right. He's fighting tear gas right now, guys. If you guys can donate a water or two, please give it to them. Straight ahead. Straight ahead. Straight ahead. Guys, we need to continue to move forward. Move forward. Keep moving forward up the steps. We will occupy the entire capital, always the capital. Keep moving
View Full Interactive Feed