reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 8, 2023 at 1:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel, with significant influence over US politicians, possesses a vast intelligence network and military support. Despite having advanced defense systems like Iron Dome, they were surprised by a recent attack from armed individuals. The origin of their weapons and plans remains a mystery. Some question if this was orchestrated to justify an ethnic cleansing campaign. The US, seemingly tired of Ukraine, may be seeking a new enemy. Israel, feeling envious of the billions given to Ukraine, is caught in the middle.

@austerrewyatt1 - Wyatt

Be Israel. Have all US politicians under your thumb. Have one of the largest global intelligence and surveillance operations known to man. Have near infinite military support from US. Have iron dome. Somehow get surprise attacked by a bunch of brown men gliding into your country. Get blown up by 5,000 rockets. Be completely bewildered as to how they obtained arms and their plans. Am I seriously supposed to believe this shit? They knew *nothing* about what was gonna happen? They welcomed this with open arms just to justify an ethnic cleansing campaign. Ukraine funding and war is growing boring for the US machine they need a new boogeyman. Israel was getting jealous of all the billions we gave to Ukraine.

Saved - October 14, 2023 at 12:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US's past actions in the Middle East, including creating Al Qaeda, have led to the current Israel-Palestine conflict and escalating tensions. Ron Paul's foreign policy of non-interventionism is seen as a solution. The US has been involved in conflicts, coups, and installing puppet leaders, often for economic gain. Netanyahu has also been aligned with these agendas. The ultimate goal may be to topple Iran before targeting Russia or China. Understanding the conflict requires a broader historical perspective.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

Remember when Hillary Clinton admitted that the US created Al Qaeda and completely destabilized the middle east in effort to beat the Soviet Union? We're now living in the result of that today with the current Israel Palestine conflict and ever increasing tensions leading up to war. This is why I think Ron Paul has always had the best foreign policy. Get us out of all these foreign nations, protect ourselves at home, and stop meddling in foreign affairs like we're the global police. The US has been institgating conflict and committing CIA coups against dozens of countries over the past 50+ years, which they call "installing democracy", but it's instead just installing central banks, destabilizing regions, installing puppet presidents that end up being corrupt, arming terrorists and radicalizing them into hating us, and quite literally manufacturing this entire war on terror, which works out conveniently for the military industrial complex to make billions and billions of dollars while the US gov't continually goes into debt. Problem, reaction, solution. They created the problem. The reaction is bombs and death. The solution is toppling the government, taking it over, and then NWO. Netanyahu has been in lockstep with these agendas as well, and has been talking with the CIA about geopolitical strategy as far back as before 9/11. Netanyahu testified to the House in 2003 that we should be going after Iraq, toppling Saddam, and said that it would immediately bring peace to the middle east. As expected it did the exact opposite, just as Clinton described here, and now they're sacrificing Hamas as pretense for war with Iran, the last country on the list to topple before going after Russia or China. You cannot look at the current Israel Palestine conflict with such a narrow myopic view of history. You need to go back much further to really understand what's happening and what the ultimate goal really is.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the US funded the Mujahideen in Afghanistan 20 years ago to fight against the Soviet Union. They imported fighters from Saudi Arabia and other places to defeat the Soviets, which eventually led to their retreat and the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, after the Soviets left, the US distanced itself from Pakistan and the Mujahideen, leaving behind a mess. The speaker acknowledges that the US helped create the problem they are now fighting, as the people they supported against the Soviets are the same ones they are fighting today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's remember here. The people we are fighting today, we funded 20 years ago. And we did it because we were locked in this struggle with the Soviet Union, they invaded Afghanistan and we did not wanna see them control Central Asia. And we went to work and it was President Reagan in partnership with the Congress, crafts who said, you know what? Sounds like a pretty good idea. Let's deal with the ISI and the Pakistani military and let's go recruit these Mujahideen and that's great. Let's get some to come from Saudi Arabia and other places importing their Wahhabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union. And guess what? They retreated. They lost 1,000,000,000 of dollars and it led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. There's a a very strong argument, which is wasn't a bad investment to end the Soviet Union, but let's be careful what we So because we will harvest. So we then left Pakistan. We said, okay, fine. You deal with the stingers that we've left all over your country. You deal with the mines that are along the border. And by the way, we don't want to have anything to do with you. In fact, we're So we stopped dealing with the Pakistani military and with ISI And we now are making up for a lot of lost time. Speaker 1: We're building a relationship that just did not exist. I said in our last trip when you were with me, that we had a huge trust deficit in part because the United States had to be to be fair, we had helped to create the Problem we're now fighting. How? Because when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea that we were gonna come to Pakistan And create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan. And we were successful. The Soviets left Afghanistan and then we said, Great, goodbye. Leaving these trained people people who were fanatical in Afghanistan and Pakistan leaving them well armed, creating a mess, frankly, that, at the time, we didn't really recognize. We were just so happy to see the Soviet Union fall and we thought, okay, fine. We're we're okay now. Everything's gonna be so much better. Now you look back, The people we're fighting today, we were supporting in the fight against the Soviets.
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 7:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The U.S. is heavily influenced by Zionists across various sectors, from politics to finance and media. They justify their support for Israel, but their main allegiance lies with the Zionist lobby. The U.S. has acted as Israel's war hammer in the Middle East, destroying countries like Iraq and Syria. Not all Zionists are Jewish, as seen with the owner of a major right-wing news corporation. Israel manipulates regional conflicts to further its agenda, but Iran, Russia, and China have thwarted their plans. The U.S. is a partnership between Zionists and Western imperialists, with Zionists gaining control over state coffers. The Zionist lobby exploits powerful individuals through lust and blackmail. Zionist America's destructive actions must be stopped. Additionally, the U.S. aims to overthrow China to maintain control over the global financial system. Britain and Europe have long been home to Zionist billionaires who unconditionally support Israel.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

Many Americans cannot believe that their entire country is run by Zionists. From Congress & executive branch to the 3-letter agencies. From the biggest banks to the privately owned Federal Reserve. From Hollywood to the biggest corporations. All under Zionist influence.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

U.S. politicians try to justify their unconditional support for Israel by claiming that U.S. needs a bulwark or carrier in the Middle East to secure American security & oil flow. That might be a side benefit. But the MAIN reason is because they're owned by the Zionist lobby.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

If anything, the U.S. has been acting as Israel's war hammer in the Middle East. Remember Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc. (and now possibly Iran)? They are regarded as enemies of Israel. The U.S. destroyed them for Israel, and as a bonus reward, U.S. billionaires get to loot the oil.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

By the way, not all Zionist are Jews. Case in point is the owner of the biggest right-wing news corporation in the U.S. (and possibly the entire West). He's not Jewish. But he's a vile Zionist.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

If you step on Israel's toe, Zionist America will hammer you with sanctions, war & Western media. Take Syria for example. Israel wanted to overthrow Assad. Arab leaders & Türkiye collaborated. Even ISIS complied. But Iran, Russia & China stood by Assad. Then Ukraine happened.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

Israel exploited Shia-Sunni rivalry to bring the Arab states & Türkiye on its side to overthrow Assad. Even ISIS was lured by the promise of a caliphate carved out of Syrian territory. But Iran & Russia prevented Zionist plan. And China helped Russia overcome Western sanctions.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

Israel has been trying to overthrow Assad since 2011 or earlier, and almost succeeded... if not for the intervention of Iran, Russia & China. Now you know why Zionist owned politicians in USA call 🇨🇳🇷🇺🇮🇷 the new "axis of evil". When you offend Israel, Uncle Sam will punish you.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

This doesn't mean the U.S. without Israel lacks its own desire to dominate the world. Rather, the U.S. is a partnership between Zionists & Western imperialists... just like how Zionist billionaires were partners of the Spanish, Portuguese, British, French & Dutch empires.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

But as the Zionists in that relationship grew in wealth & influence, they began to marry into the Western ruling elites & slowly took over state coffers. As one Zionist banker famously boasted: "GIVE me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws."

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

However, some powerful men already have more money than they know what to do with. The Zionist lobby understands that such men crave one thing more than anything... "freedom". The "freedom" to indulge in the forbidden & unlawful. Lust & blackmail is how they can be controlled.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

Zionist America is a terrifying warship barrelling down on the innocents of the world with great destruction. Yesterday it was the children of Vietnam, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan & too many others to name. Today it's the children of Gaza. Zionist America must be stopped.

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

Addendum: The U.S. is hell bent on overthrowing China... not just for its assistance to Russia and for brokering peace between Iran & Saudi Arabia... but also for creating an alternative financial/economic system free from Zionist America's control... 🧵: https://x.com/NiMingda_GG/status/1524812618954948608?s=20

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

The "Rules-Based International Order" - How the Elites of America & the West Profiteer from Endless Wars and Defraud the World: https://t.co/O4IGzb7yrI

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

Addendum: Britain & Europe have been the nests of billionaire Zionist vampires for centuries. Today, Zionist America can count on their allies to "stand with Israel" unconditionally. But what's in it for those countries? It's revealed in this 🧵: https://x.com/NiMingda_GG/status/1646691064781103104?s=20

@NiMingda_GG - 倪明达 (Ni Mingda)

How the U.S. Defrauds the World with the USD and Shares Its Financial Spoils With Its Staunchest Allies: https://t.co/75X5PbPoha

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 2:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In early 2000, a counterintelligence investigation looked into whether Amdocs, a billing software provider, was used by Israel to eavesdrop on US government communications. The investigation also raised questions about telecom operations on 9/11. The Mossad and Israeli intelligence likely knew about the events of 9/11, including the sale of critical infrastructure to Ericsson and NeuStar. The Saudi connection, involving the Bin Laden family, is also significant. The 9/11 Commission and the Monica Lewinsky Trial were both seen as cover-ups. The article explores these connections and calls for justice. (499 characters)

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

In early 2000, federal agencies conducted a counterintelligence investigation to determine if Amdocs was being used by Israel to eavesdrop on U.S. government communications. Amdocs provides billing software to Bell Atlantic, which provides the phone systems to government buildings, including the White House and the State Department. This is what the Intelligence community would call "Blocking and Tackling" - I wonder what other Telecom operations took place on 9/11? Such fantastic "counterintelligence" that on 9/11 Former President George H. W. Bush happened to be attending a conference at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Washington, DC - (the Secret Service should have those records). Among the guests of honor was investor Shafig Bin Laden, brother of Osama Bin Laden. Put simply... There is no way in hell that the Mossad and Israeli intelligence weren't aware of EXACTLY what happened on 9/11 including selling out our critical infrastructure to Ericsson and NeuStar on that day, as well as replacing the phone and VOIP systems in the White House and all Government buildings while the False Flag operation took place on American soil that very day... The Saudi's are just as bad if not worse - fake Arabs who were financed and funded by the British - who have always owned them. Our next president needs to be someone who isn't going to play soft ball with these literal Demons, they sacrifice Americans on our own soil and then send our men and women off to a fabricated war to be slaughtered in their war games for more profit. The longer people in positions of power and influence ignore these indisputable truths: the more you ignore any semblance of justice for all lives lost due to the attacks from that day. Including and most especially the soldiers who died in the bogus "War on Terror" - where for 17+ years Ericsson sold their Geo-location data to the very "enemies" that the intelligence community and State Department worked to arm, finance and fund. Read the WikiLeaks Cables or my X Highlights & threads - everything, including war maps, documents and private emails are all there. Julian Assange should be freed as soon as humanly possible - especially if we want to live in a world and future worth fighting for. See links below for sources...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Amdocs Limited, an Israeli telecommunications company, handles directory assistance and call records for major US phone companies. Following September 11th, over 60 Israelis were arrested or detained, including some active military personnel. Investigators suspect that these individuals may have had prior knowledge of the attacks but did not share it. A high-ranking investigator mentioned "tie-ins" but refused to provide further details, citing classified evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most directory assistance calls and virtually all call records and billing in the US are done for the phone companies by Amdocs Limited, an Israeli based private telecommunications company. Amdocs has contracts with the 25 biggest phone companies in America and more worldwide. Since September 11th, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained either under the new Patriot Anti terrorism Law or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained according to investigators, who say some of the detainees Also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States. Project is going to collapse. Nothing information. Burdick is going to collapse. Nothing information. Investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are quote tie ins. But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them saying quote, Evidence linking these Israelis 2911 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

James Comey (SDNY) investigated the Clinton Foundation back in December of 2001 - we're all about to find out just how close to the September 11th, 2001 attack these people really were... Comey was a partner at McGuireWoods along with Mark Brzezinski. Mika's brother and Partner at McGuireWoods was nominated by Barack Obama to be ambassador to Sweden during the then ignored Iran sanctions that connect directly to the Clintons, their Foundation & Ericsson. Richard Cullen - Godfather to James Comey's daughter is Senior Partner at the firm and was hired by Mike Pence during the Russia probe. James Comey's daughter - Maureen Comey who defended Osama Bin Laden's spokesman was heading up the Violent and Organized Crime unit in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). She was one of the federal prosecutors leading the criminal case against Ms. Ghislaine Maxwell. https://vault.fbi.gov/william-j.-clinton-foundation https://abovethelaw.com/2017/06/guess-who-james-comeys-godchild-is/ https://telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2021/11/29/james-comeys-daughter-vs-bin-laden-aides-lawyer-legal-teams/

William J. Clinton Foundation This initial release consists of material from the FBI's files related to the William J. Clinton Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. The bulk of these records come from a 2001 FBI investigation into the pardon of Marc Rich (1934-2013), aka Marcell David Reich, by President Clinton in 2001; it was closed in 2005. The material is heavily redacted due to personal privacy protections and grand jury secrecy rules. vault.fbi.gov
Guess Who James Comey Picked As His Daughter's Godfather - Above the Law Things could get awkward. abovethelaw.com
James Comey's daughter vs Bin Laden aide's lawyer as legal teams line up in Maxwell trial The 32-year-old Maurene Comey is up against the 'super lawyer' Bobbi Sternheim telegraph.co.uk

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Bush Sr. Meets with Bin Laden Family on Behalf of Carlyle Group on 9/11 https://newswar.info/bush-sr-meets-with-bin-laden-family-on-behalf-of-carlyle-group-on-9-11/

Bush Sr. Meets with Bin Laden Family on Behalf of Carlyle Group on 9/11 Former President George H. W. Bush, attended a conference at the Ritz Carlton hotel in Washington, DC. Among the guests of honor was Shafig Bin Laden. newswar.info

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The investigation shifted to the White House in September 1998 when Kenneth W. Starr, the Whitewater independent counsel, reported in his impeachment referral to Congress that the Israelis might have listened to amorous conversations between President Clinton and Monica S. Lewinsky. The White House and the Israelis dismissed the reports. https://archive.li/sjEIm

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The 9/11 Commission was also a coverup that they managed to blunder and lose control of - this is what our government thinks of the deaths of 3000 Americans and countless soldiers thereafter... https://t.co/JU787w2333

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The United States Federal Government spent more money on the Monica Lewinsky Trial than they did investigating the deaths of over 3,000 people on 9/11… Let that sink in. https://t.co/0wllShr6RF

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

More connections to the Bush Family, x-Secretary of State James Baker, the Saudis and the Bin Laden family... https://archives.globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL110A.html

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 4:43 PM

@richimedhurst - Richard Medhurst

Bin Laden never attacked a single Israeli target, despite his "sympathy" for Palestinians. He was a CIA asset like his mentor al Zawahiri. I was next door when they blew up the Egyptian embassy in Pakistan. Israel worked WITH Al Qaeda to hurt Syria. Israel/US/AQ = same team

Saved - November 30, 2023 at 8:41 PM

@SpiritofHo - Danny Haiphong

The US, Israel, and their NATO apologists are the real Axis of Evil.

Saved - December 22, 2023 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel's actions in the Middle East have contributed to the European refugee crisis. They have used Jewish-run NGOs and refugee resettlement agencies to empty the Middle East of potential opponents. Israel has a long history of seeking refugee resettlement outside its borders, with Europe being a major destination. The US and Israel's interventions in the Middle East have directly led to the influx of refugees into Europe. Jewish organizations, such as IsraAID, have played a significant role in facilitating the movement and resettlement of refugees in Europe. The focus should be on long-term integration of refugee populations to address the issue effectively.

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In Depth: How Israel Created the European Refugee Crisis The world has looked on with shock and horror at the Jewish bombardment of innocent civilians in Palestine over the last few days. Apparently even Israel thinks their actions are indefensible, since on May 15th, (1/116)

@poxesfoxes - Pox Populi

@HankHeil @_______showband You were saying? https://t.co/cenSkMy5OY

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) destroyed a building housing the Associated Press (AP) and other media outlets in Gaza with the intention of stopping images of Palestinian suffering from reaching the rest of the world. Following the attack on the AP, (2/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israel stepped up its bombing of civilian targets, killing dozens of Palestinians with airstrikes on populated streets.But the Zionist strategy entails more than simply brutally punishing Palestinians and other Arab populations that stand up to them. (3/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

They also utilize an extensive network of Jewish-run NGOs and refugee resettlement agencies in the West to empty the Middle-East of potential opponents.Since the creation of the Jewish state in 1948, (4/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

refugee resettlement outside its borders has always been a major strategic goal. A 2013 article from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed secret archival documents showing that from the very beginning, (5/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Zionist Jews saw Europe as the destination of choice for the Arabs they had http://displaced.In the first half of the 1960s, the Foreign Ministry continued to examine plans to encourage the emigration of Arab refugees from the Middle East to Europe, (6/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

particularly to France and Germany. One option that was considered was to find them jobs in Germany, which was then in dire need of working hands. During 1962, Israeli officials examined the possibility of finding employment for Palestinian refugee laborers in Germany, (7/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Austria and Switzerland. The initial checks done for this plan, known as “Operation Worker,” and the correspondence involved, were kept completely under wraps. (8/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This plan was eventually tabled since then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier feared it could generate a huge backlash from the German people. In the 1960s Israel was considerably less powerful and secure than it is today, (9/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

so such bold plans had to be put on hold until later. But it demonstrates that foisting the Arabs on Europe as a form of racial revenge was on the minds of the Jews in Israel from the very beginning.Demographics have always been at the forefront of Israeli policy, (10/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and their control over Western governments has long been used to ensure that Jews remain a demographic majority on their newly seized territory. (11/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Meier leveraged Jewish power in Washington to scuttle a 1961 plan spearheaded by President Kennedy to offer resettlement in Israel to the then 1.1 million Palestinian refugees displaced by the 1948 war. In late 1961, in the wake of President Kennedy’s initiative, Dr. (12/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Joseph Johnson, from the Carnegie Endowment, was appointed a special representative to tackle the problem and to work with the parties involved to come up with a solution. (13/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The plan he devised − to distribute questionnaires to the Palestinian refugees and permit those who wished to return to Israel, subject to security considerations − stirred deep fears in Jerusalem.Meir, who was appalled by the idea, (14/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

wielded all the influence at her command in Washington in order to ensure that the plan met a quick death.The Clean BreakThe entire history of the Arab-Israeli conflict is beyond the scope of this article, (15/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

but the roots of the current refugee invasion can be traced back to the year 1996 when the so-called “neconservative” movement was formalized with the publication of the now infamous memo “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” by several Jewish foreign (16/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

policy analysts at the Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies in Washington DC. The authors included well-known Jewish warmonger Richard Perle, (17/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and the Jew David Wurmser who would go on to be the Middle-East policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney during the George W. Bush administration. (18/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The “clean break” memo recommended that Israel break with its old strategy of using the United States simply for defensive military aid and diplomatic cover, and instead start an aggressive war against the entire Arab world and Iran using the US military as a proxy army. (19/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In particular it recommended taking out Iraq and Syria.Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. (20/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.A year later, in 1997, (21/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Jewish-Zionist “intellectuals” William Kristol and Robert Kagan set up the now infamous Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which recommended the United States engage in a massive military buildup to be used for pushing “democracy” around the world. (22/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Of the 25 signatories to PNAC’s statement of principles, 15 were Jewish and ten served in the George W. Bush administration, including Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz. Richard Perle has also served as chairman of PNAC. (23/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

PNAC’s focus was on “regime change” in Iraq, though they acknowledged that without some “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” this would be difficult to sell to the American people. That event came on 9/11, (24/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and the US subsequently invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 at the behest of the Jewish-Zionist warmongers in the Bush administration.Endless WarAccording to a 2006 interview with retired General Wesley Clark, (25/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the decision to invade Iraq was made two weeks after 9/11, and there were even more ambitious plans in the works to invade “seven countries in five years.” Playing into popular conspiracy theories, Clark claimed this strategy was somehow connected to oil. (26/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

He failed to mention that the plan he described had already been laid out in the “clean break” memo and PNAC policy papers written by various Jewish-Zionist officials in the Bush administration, (27/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

all of which placed the issue of Israel’s security significantly ahead of oil issues. In fact, oil politics were mainly viewed as an impediment to Israel’s interests due to the strategic leverage oil has offered to Arab countries and Iran. (28/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The issue of oil has always been used to distract Americans from the real reason for their government’s seemingly insane foreign policy in the Middle-East. If the US simply wanted secure access to oil, (29/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the last thing it would do would be to start wars and topple governments, thereby creating significant disruptions to world oil markets. Oil is often cited as the motivation for America’s longstanding policy of support for the barbaric regime in Saudi Arabia, (30/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

making a farce of its claims to care about human rights and democracy. But with the Iraq War, the US showed it is more than willing to take out major oil producing states if Israel requires it. (31/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The longstanding friendly relationship between Saudi Arabia and Israel is a far better explanation for the US stance towards that country. In 2011, civil wars broke out in Syria and Libya, both of which were fomented by the US acting on behalf of Israel. (32/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The nauseating refrain of “supporting democracy” has been trotted out by the US for years as a threadbare excuse to arm and fund terrorist militias in Syria to try to remove Syrian President Bashar Assad from power, (33/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

while pretending to fight against the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria” (ISIS) terrorist group. (34/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

A 2012 email published by Wikileaks from current Biden administration National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton clearly outlined the US position regarding Islamist terrorist groups. (35/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Sullivan made the astounding statement that Al Quaeda, who the US claims perpetrated the 9/11 attacks that killed 3,000 Americans, “is on our side in Syria.”The “last item” Sullivan mentions, (36/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

refers to a Reuters report that says this: AL-ZAWAHIRI URGES MUSLIM SUPPORT FOR OPPOSITIONAl-Qaida leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid rebel forces in their fight against supporters of Syrian President Asad in an interne[sic] video (37/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

recording. Al-Zawahiri also urged the Syrian people not to rely on the AL, Turkey, or the United States for assistance. (38/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Sullivan’s email puts the lie to all public statements from Washington that the purpose of intervention in Syria is to fight against radical Sunni terrorist groups. (39/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The fact that the Jewish-owned US media completely ignored this earth shattering revelation is a testament to its bias and corruption.The US has also engaged in numerous bombings of Syria over the years, (40/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

usually at times when the Assad government was poised to win a major battle and take back a chunk of its rightful territory. The continued presence of US troops and mercenaries in Syria, along with funding for Islamist rebel groups and occasional bombing, (41/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

is meant to prevent Assad from retaking his country. If the US really wanted ISIS defeated, the obvious strategy would be to leave Assad alone to crush them with the assistance of Russia and Iran. (42/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This policy would also have the benefit of actually being popular with American citizens, a fact that was cynically exploited by President Trump to win election in 2016.For its part, (43/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israel has provided medical aid to ISIS and other terrorists fighting Assad and in 2019 Israeli military official Gadi Eisenkot publicly admitted that Israel had been arming and paying monthly salaries to ISIS terrorists. In 2011 Libyan President Col. (44/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Muammar Quadafi was murdered by US backed terrorists after an eight month civil war. That the US was behind this assassination is well known and not controversial. In her role as Secretary of State, (45/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Hillary Clinton unabashedly celebrated Quadafi’s murder during a 2011 television interview in which she exclaimed with psychotic glee “We came. We Saw. He died.”Quadafi understood that Israel was behind the Western aggression against his country, (46/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and attempted to save himself and his government by bypassing the US and appealing directly to Israel and influential American Jews. According to Israeli sources, (47/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

in 2011 he sought to plead his case to Israel and to the Israel lobby which controls foreign policy in the US. (48/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

…when the Libyan regime was teetering on the brink – due to the uprising and the damage from the UN-imposed Lockerbie sanctions first implemented in 1992 – she added, “Gaddafi desperately made extraordinary overtures to the Jewish lobby in the US and to Israel as well. (49/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

”While the Jewish-owned media in the US exclusively focused on alleged “human rights abuses” by Quadafi as the motivation for removing him from power, Israeli strategists have been more honest and realistic. Writing in 2016, Dr. Rafael Olek, (50/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

a strategic analyst for the Begin–Sadat Center for Strategic Studies in Israel, reiterated Israel’s commitment to its long term strategic goal of removing all oppositional governments no matter the human cost.With regard to the global aspect, (51/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the Libyan issue raises several concerns. Firstly, there are question marks regarding the actual ability to enforce regimes of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction on rogue states. Secondly, (52/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

one may ask: would it be better to accept the stable regime of tyrants such as Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein, Assad and the Ayatollah regime in Iran, or should those tyrants be toppled despite the ensuing process where their countries disintegrate, (53/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

which involves severe violence? As much as we may regret the situation in Syria and Iraq, it seems, at least from the Israeli perspective, that the second option is preferable – it is easier to confine and the situation may stabilize eventually. (54/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Despite the misery and death throughout the Middle-East caused by the Israeli strategy of “regime change,” Israel sees no reason to back off this policy. And why would it? Israel itself has remained remarkably secure throughout the chaos, (55/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and has even increased its power and improved its diplomatic position.The Refugee CrisisIsrael’s wars and interventions in the Middle-East, working through its US proxy, (56/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

were the direct catalyst for the European refugee crisis which boiled over in 2015 and has lead to violence, terrorism, rape and political repression against native Europeans. The two major points of entry for refugees and migrants to Europe are Greece and Italy. (57/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The US/Israeli orchestrated fall of Qaddafi in 2011 opened up a major route for refugees from the Middle-East and Africa to flow into Europe. According to the Washington Post 400, (58/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

000 migrants from the Middle-East and Africa flowed into Italy from Libya between 2014 and 2017 due to the overthrow of Qaddafi.Since the collapse of Moammar Gaddafi’s regime in Libya, the number of migrants crossing the Mediterranean has soared, (59/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

as people have taken advantage of a vacuum of authority to set sail from the country’s northern coast. A network of human smugglers who facilitate the traffic has expanded from the tip of North Africa down to countries such as Niger and Sudan. (60/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Contacts for smugglers circulate on Facebook and WhatsApp in major cities across Africa. Since 2014, more than 400,000 migrants and refugees have crossed the Mediterranean from Libya to Italy. (61/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This was a reversal of what had been a successful joint effort between Qaddafi and Europe to block migrants from reaching European shores. In 2004, Qaddafi began offering to control refugee flows as an incentive for normalization agreements with European states. (62/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In 2010 he prophetically stated that Europe would turn black without his assistance.Back to 2004, Qaddafi began making deals with individual European states to control the tide of migrants. In August 2010, he visited his friend Silvio Berlusconi, (63/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

then president of Italy, in Rome and said Europe would turn “black” without his help.“Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European, and even black, as there are millions who want to come in,” Qaddafi said. (64/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

“What will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans … we don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions. (65/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

”These deals were a success. With the help of Qaddafi, the flow of migrants and refugees into Italy was drastically cut in 2009. In June 2009, (66/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

he signed a “friendship” agreement with Italy that involved joint naval patrols against migrants and Italy handing over migrants captured en route to Europe to Libya, no questions asked. (67/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The number of Africans caught trying to illegally enter Italy fell by more than 75 percent that year.This mutually beneficial arrangement between Italy and Libya was destroyed by Israel and the US, resulting in Quadafi’s morbid prediction coming true in 2015. (68/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The Italian government has attempted to revive agreements with Libya in recent years to stem the tide of migrants. These attempts have been met with legal challenges. (69/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The British NGO Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) filed a suit against Italy in the European Court in 2017, alleging human rights abuses. GLAN’s legal adviser is Itammar Mann, a Jewish Israeli legal professor that teaches “refugee law” in Haifa, Israel. (70/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

There are about 6.6 million refugees from the Syrian civil war worldwide, one million of which are in Europe. The peak years for refugee arrival in Europe were 2015-2017 when about 900,000 Syrians entered, mainly through Greece. (71/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The displacement of the Syrian people serves a strategic goal for Israel by denying the Assad government of both human capital and potential recruits for its military. According to Pew Research, a disproportionate number of refugees in Europe are military aged men. (72/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

IsraAID workers help to land a migrant boat in Greece.Israel and Jewish-run NGOs in the West are the main facilitators of the movement and resettlement of Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi and Afghani refugees in Europe. (73/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

All four countries have been destabilized through war and sanctions by Israel and the US. IsraAID, the Israeli refugee agency, has operated the refugee centers on the Greek Island of Lesbos since 2015. (74/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Greek refugee aid centers are mainly operated by Israelis; in Lesbos there is an Israeli school for Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi and Afghan refugees; and it is all part of a joint plan to revolutionize the concept of ‘Tikkun Olam’ and Jewish volunteering around the world. (75/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israeli reporter Liad Osmo quoted a Syrian refugee identified as “H., aged 20, from Aleppo” arriving on Lesbos in 2019.“My whole life, all through my childhood in Syrian schools, I was taught that the Israelis are the enemy, (76/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and then the first thing I see when I approach the Greek coast is the Star of David on the shirts of Israelis who reach out and place me on the ground. (77/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

”Osmo goes on to say that the program to resettle refugees in Western countries will reach all over the world and involve several other Jewish agencies. This is made possible by a $66 million dollar investment from the State of Israel. (78/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The concept of working to build a better world is now being adopted by a major Jewish organization in conjunction with the State of Israel…The Jewish Agency is now working with the Mosaic United organization on a joint project that is expected to dramatically increase (79/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the number of young Jews involved in giving back to their local community. To American Jews, this is known as Tikkun Olam – or healing the world. This Jewish concept became a central tenet among the fourth generation descendants of Jewish immigrants to the United States. (80/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The projects will be implemented all over the world – from Puerto Rico and Greece to Nepal, Mexico, India and Ethiopia through organizations such as IsraAID, Project TEN, Tevel B’Tzedek and more…“For the most part, (81/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the only thing that makes Jewish students around the world think about their Jewish identity is when there is a BDS (the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement) demonstration on campus, or an anti-Semitic event somewhere around the world, (82/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

” says Rabbi Benji Levy, CEO of Mosaic United. “Such incidents distance them from the desire to be Jewish or associated with Israel.”Levy says the project was adopted by the Israeli government several years ago, under the auspices of the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs. (83/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

“The government will invest $66 million, which is a third of the budget,” he says.Rabbi Benji Levy welcomes Israel’s enemies to the Greek island of Lesbos.Germany has taken on far more refugees of Jewish conflicts than any other European state. (84/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Against the will of the German people, Angela Merkel famously promised to take in 500,000 refugees per year in 2015. Israel’s footprint can be felt in Germany as well, where Israeli NGOs provide Arabic speakers with language lessons and find them work opportunities. (85/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In 2018 Merkel presented IsraAID with an award for their work on integrating Arabic speakers into Germany. On their website, IsraAID boasts of the extensive programs they have set up in Germany to facilitate the integration of refugees, (86/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

while leaving out any mention of the Jewish state’s responsibility for the crisis in the first place.IsraAID has been operating in Germany since 2015, when one million asylum seekers and refugees reached the country, (87/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

most fleeing the brutality of the Syrian civil war and the threat of ISIS in Iraq and Syria… IsraAID Germany’s programs include refugee youth leadership groups, post-trauma psychosocial support for children using expressive arts therapy, (88/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and a special program supporting survivors of the Yazidi genocide. IsraAID’s team in Germany is a multicultural mosaic of Arabic-, Hebrew-, German- and English-speaking psychologists, social workers, art therapists and educators. (89/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

They utilize their international experience and intercultural approach to promote the sustainable well-being and integration of refugees in Germany.…IsraAID’s global response includes sustainable programs to build resilience, provide education, (90/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

combat gender-based violence, advance child protection, improve sanitation and offer livelihood opportunities. Since the height of the Syrian refugee crisis in 2015, IsraAID has provided medical, psychosocial and educational support to over 100, (91/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

000 refugees in Greece and Germany alone.Many refugees fleeing war and persecution in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria for countries like Germany enter Europe through Greece. In Lesbos, (92/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the Greek island where many refugees first arrive after a harrowing sea journey from Turkey, IsraAID provides medical care to new arrivals on the shoreline and operates the School of Peace, the only institution offering mother-tongue education in Arabic, Congolese French, (93/116

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Farsi and Kurdish, with more than 200 students every week.…Through our work with IsraAID, we have seen the power and potential of the refugees we work with as they write a new story for themselves and their communities. It is a story of learning new languages, (94/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

of adjusting to new surroundings. It is 500 people, Arabic-, Kurdish-, Farsi- and French-speaking Muslims and Christians, celebrating Eid-al-Fitr in a Greek school run by an Israeli humanitarian aid organization. (95/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israel gushes with humanitarian rhetoric when talking about hosting an Eid-al-Fitr celebration in Europe for Muslims fleeing Zionist wars, but such a celebration is totally unthinkable in Israel. (96/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In 2021 the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spent Eid-al-Fitr bombing Palestinian civilians in Gaza. The previous day, fanatical Jews were recorded dancing in Jerusalem because they thought one of Islam’s holiest mosques was on fire. (97/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Any nervousness expressed by Jews over the influx of foreigners into Europe has revolved solely around the potential negative impact on European Jews. The negative impact on native Europeans is only considered through the danger, from the Jewish perspective, (98/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

of galvanizing nationalist opposition. In a paper for the liberal Brookings Institution in 2015 Daniel Byman, professor of Jewish Civilization at Georgetown University in Washington DC, (99/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

said that the solution to this problem was long term integration of the refugee populations in Europe.If the refugees are treated as a short-term humanitarian problem rather than as a long-term integration challenge, then we are likely to see this problem worsen. (100/116)

Saved - March 23, 2024 at 6:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
ISIS claims responsibility for the Moscow terrorist attacks. In contrast, they apologized to Israel for mistakenly attacking the IDF. There are similarities to the Nord Stream attack, where everyone seems aware but plays dumb. The CIA's creation of the Mujahideen in Afghanistan in the 1980s transformed into Al Qaeda after the USSR's fall. Around 2014, the US and Israel allegedly created ISIS to fight Assad in Syria. According to Trump in 2016, Obama is the founder of ISIS, with Hillary Clinton as the co-founder. The head of Mossad states that Al Qaeda has never attacked Israel, which is why they treat Al Qaeda soldiers in Israel.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

🔹ISIS claims responsibility for the terrorist attacks in Moscow. 🔹Contrast: ISIS **apologized** to Israel after mistakenly attacking the IDF in Golan Heights. It’s like the Nord Stream attack. Everyone knows what’s happening, but everyone plays dumb. https://t.co/e6OkDQzlCe

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

In the 1980s, the CIA created the Mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight the USSR. That project transformed into Al Qaeda after the fall of the USSR. Then, around 2014, the US and Israel created ISIS to fight Syrian President Assad. ISIS is Israel. ISIS is CIA. https://t.co/LtKMWTNtlo

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

“Obama is the founder of ISIS. Crooked Hillary Clinton is the co-founder” — Trump in 2016 https://t.co/yGKmlSxIKd

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Obama is the founder of ISIS, with crooked Hillary Clinton as the co-founder.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Obama. He is the founder of ISIS. He's the founder of ISIS. K? He's the founder. He founded ISIS, and I would say the cofounder would be crooked Hillary Clinton.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Head of Mossad: “Al Qaeda has never attacked Israel. That’s why we treat Al Qaeda soldiers in Israel.” https://t.co/j5GCVI9esr #ISIS #Russia

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters, including those from the Al Qaeda proxy Nusrah front. The speaker believes in dealing with enemies humanely, regardless of political considerations. Taking in wounded fighters is seen as a humanitarian act, not just a political or tactical move.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There have been reports that Israel has been treating wounded Syrian rebel fighters in its hospitals on the border, including fighters from Nusrah front, which is, of course, the Al Qaeda proxy in Syria. Do those reports worry you that Israel's helping wounded Al Qaeda aligned fighters? Speaker 1: As I said before in a different context, it's always useful also to deal with your enemies in a humane way, and I think that when you have people who are wounded and you can deal with them in humane way, the considerations as to whether to take them in are not simply whether it's politically, useful or whether it's politically Speaker 0: confusingly humanitarian, you say. So there's no tactical or political strategic I didn't say
Saved - March 23, 2024 at 4:08 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

It is a fact that Obama created ISIS with the help of Israel. Israel also created Hamas. The west used the threat of Islamic terror to take our freedoms and invade the world. After destroying the Middle East the globalist then opened our borders and flooded us with jihadist.

@robertsepehr - Robert Sepehr

@Cobratate Here's Obama admitting to training ISIS (ISIL) https://t.co/9F7n8WxSvv

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are accelerating the training of ISIL forces, including Sunni tribe volunteers in Anbar Province, with the extra measures I requested last month.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So with the additional steps I ordered last month, we're speeding up training of ISL forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province. Month, we're speeding up training of ISIL forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province.
Saved - August 28, 2024 at 10:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe many people simplify the issue of terrorism by blaming Islam rather than examining the complexities of Western foreign policy. The rise of what we now call 'Islamic terrorism' correlates with the creation of Israel and the subsequent destabilization of the Middle East. This chaos has fostered resentment towards the West, leading to the emergence of radical groups. It's crucial to recognize that the environment, shaped by foreign interventions, plays a significant role in radicalization, rather than attributing it solely to Islam. Understanding this complexity is essential for addressing the root causes of terrorism.

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

They hate us for our freedoms. Not because we destabilize their countries and kill millions of innocents in the process. No. It’s our freedoms that they hate. Right... You see, it’s very easy for people to blame Islam for all terrorist attacks committed by Muslims, rather than Western foreign policy. Because dissecting Western foreign policy and seeing how it directly correlates to Islamic terrorism is far more complicated than just blaming terrorist acts committed by Muslims on Islam. In fact, what we understand today as ‘Islamic terrorism’ wasn’t really prevalent before 1948. The reason why it wasn’t prevalent was because, for the most part, the Islamic world was stable. Muslims lived in Muslim lands, traded with the West, and were content living in their own regions. When Israel was created, a Jewish state built on stolen land surrounded by Muslim countries, it caused absolute carnage across the Middle East, and then the world. Western forces constantly fought to defend Israel from its Arab neighbors, causing those neighbors to develop enmity towards the West. The West inherited all of Israel’s enemies. Since the creation of Israel, Israel has lobbied Western nations, primarily the US, to cause complete and utter carnage all over the Middle East in order to protect its own borders. They did this through political lobbies and powerful Zionist Jews who have an immense amount of influence on US politics. This results in the destabilization of Middle Eastern nations, and out of this anger at the West and Israel, more extreme Islamic sects have formed, hell-bent on revenge by any means necessary. It’s natural that if you create complete and utter chaos, groups feeding on that chaos will emerge. Then, since Israel is a religious ethno-state, they don’t take in any of the refugees from these lands—it’s the US and Europe that take in the refugees. Many of these refugees are relieved that they have a safe country to flee to, while others are absolutely furious. In their eyes, they now have to seek refuge in a country that was complicit in their own country’s destruction. They find it humiliating. And among these humiliated people, radicals begin to form, hell-bent on revenge by any means necessary. You see, it wasn’t necessarily Islam that radicalized them; rather, it was their environment. But because they are both radicalized and Muslim, they are now labeled ‘Muslim radicals.’ And because it’s Muslim lands that are being destroyed, it’s Muslim radicals that are being created in far greater numbers. But the average person can’t comprehend that, so it’s much easier to say, ‘Oh, it’s Islam making those people terrorists,’ rather than acknowledging that the environment Western foreign policy created made them terrorists. It also lets the Zionist elite get off scot-free because now the finger isn’t pointed at them for the issue; the boogeyman is now the Muslims. I’d wager that if any other region of the planet were under the same conditions as the Muslim world, you’d also see high numbers of radicals emerging from those regions. In fact, when most of these terrorists give a reason for their actions, after saying the first bit—which is usually something like ‘In the name of Allah!’ (and, like I said, they’re Muslim radicals, so it’s only natural that they’ll give the religious reason first)—they then go on to say that it’s the West’s foreign policy that has motivated their actions. Of course, their terrorism is wrong, but it’s also extremely important that everyone understands the REAL root cause of it. Saying ‘It’s Islam that’s causing it!’ is the lazy excuse, and it gives the real criminals a free pass to continue destroying the world. Islamic terrorism across the West wasn't really prevalent when we left their lands alone. Saying it’s the West’s foreign policy, which is centered around the protection of Israel, is the more complex reasoning, but it’s the far truer one.

@narrative_hole - What the media hides.

Photos of the Haditha Massасre were finally leaked after 19 years US marines executed 24 Iraqi civilians including entire families with infants https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/in-the-dark/the-haditha-massacre-photos-that-the-military-didnt-want-the-world-to-see

The Haditha Massacre Photos That the Military Didn’t Want the World to See When U.S. Marines killed twenty-four people in an Iraqi town, they also recorded the aftermath of their actions. For years, the military tried to keep these photos from the public. Madeleine Baran reports. newyorker.com
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 10:24 PM

@Kahlissee - Khalissee

Who was behind the Iraq Invasion? How about Libya? Who’s been working for decades to provoke a war with Iran? Julian Assange tried to tell us who with WikiLeaks https://t.co/dtb6Y22lRT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Saddam is actively pursuing nuclear weapons and is not satisfied with his existing chemical and biological arsenal. A congressional hearing in September 2002 saw calls for war on Iraq, with claims that removing Saddam would positively impact the region. However, the subsequent US-led invasion caused widespread destabilization and led to over a million deaths, fueling extremist groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS. Netanyahu argued that dismantling Saddam's regime was necessary, as his nuclear program had evolved to allow production in smaller, hidden centrifuges. He also warned that Iraq and Iran were in a race to develop nuclear weapons, with Iran advancing in ballistic missile technology. The situation was presented as a pressing threat, not a hypothetical scenario.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is no question whatsoever that Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever. And there is no question that once he acquires it, history shifts immediately. There is no question that he had not given up on his nuclear program, not whatsoever. There is also no question that he was not satisfied with the arsenal of chemical and biological, weapons that he had and was trying to perfect them constantly. Saddam is hell bent on, achieving atomic bombs, atomic capabilities as soon as he can. Speaker 1: In this September 2002 congressional hearing, Netanyahu openly called for war on Iraq and insisted that a US military invasion would be hugely beneficial for the entire Middle East. Speaker 0: If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. And I think that people sitting right next door in Iran, young people, and many others will say the time of such regimes, of such chest bots is gone. There is a new age. Something new is happening. Speaker 1: In reality, the catastrophic and illegal US led war and occupation in Iraq set the region ablaze, destabilizing numerous countries, leading to the deaths of more than 1,000,000 people, fueling extremist Salafi jihadist groups like Al Qaeda and eventually giving birth to ISIS. Netanyahu was an absolutist. He declared that there was no other option but to dismantle the government in Baghdad. Speaker 0: 2 decades ago, it was possible to forts Saddam's nuclear ambitions by bombing a single installation. But today, nothing less than dismantling his regime will do because Saddam's nuclear program has fundamentally changed in those 2 decades. He no longer needs one large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country. And I wanna remind you that Iraq is a very big country. Speaker 1: Yet Netanyahu's lies didn't stop there. He also said the same of Iran and Libya. Speaker 0: The two nations that are vying, competing with each other, who will be the first to achieve nuclear weapons, is Iraq and Iran. And Iran, by the way, is also outpacing Iraq in the development of ballistic missile systems that they hope will reach the Eastern Seaboard of the United States within 15 years. Now the question is what's your next step knowing that 3 of these nations are developing nuclear weapons? This is not a hypothesis. It is fact. Iraq, Iran, and Libya are racing to develop nuclear weapons.
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 10:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of insights about the conflict in Syria, emphasizing that it was a proxy war rather than a civil war, fueled by foreign jihadists and weapons. Many countries, including the US and Israel, colluded to topple Assad for regional dominance and pipeline interests. Once viewed positively, Assad's secular regime fostered coexistence among various groups. However, the US funded extremist factions, leading to widespread violence and the destruction of cultural heritage. The narrative around the conflict has often overlooked the complexities and the realities on the ground.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

50 photos and other media to illustrate the truth about Syria and Assad. Long 🧵 https://t.co/622qn1xfJL

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

What happened since 2011 was NOT a civil war. It was a proxy war waged by 100,000+ jihadists flown into Syria from all over the world. https://t.co/lIHzpYYegr

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Weapons also flowed from all over the world. And they were sneaked into Syria mostly across the Syria-Turkey border. Some came in through Syria and Iraq as well. https://t.co/VtTSj6dXqI

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The collusion to topple Assad involved many countries. US and Israel supplied weapons, money and propaganda. Saudi Arabia and Qatar provided money. Al Jazeera did the propaganda. Turkey and Jordan played key roles in logistics. UK provided propaganda and established the White Helmets. France recruited traitors.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The two main reasons: * US and Israel want total hegemony in the region. The US has had plans to break up many countries in the region. Plus, the Greater Israel project. * Qatar wanted a gas pipeline thru Syria to Turkey to Europe. But Assad wanted an Iranian pipeline. https://t.co/M4lvlz8ZC5

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

In 2010, the NY Times travel section listed "31 best places to visit in the world." And Damascus - capital of Syria - was ranked #7! Why? Because Syria under Assad was peaceful, safe and prosperous!

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

In 2010, Vogue magazine had a nice article on Asma Assad, the First Lady of Syria. "A Rose in the Desert" described all her great works in education, theater, charity, hospitals etc. Asma Assad was born and raised in the UK, where she met her husband, who was an ophthalmologist.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The West once loved Assad. He was called the "Lion of Damascus." * France gave him the highest award -- Legion of Honor. * Queen Elizabeth invited Assad and his wife * Nancy Pelosi flew to Syria * European + Arab leaders met with him all the time * Even the Pope went to Syria

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Syria under Assad was secular and moderate. Sunnis, Shiites, Christians, Alawites, Kurds, Armenians etc. got along with each other. No Al Qaeda, no Sharia Law, no Muslim Brotherhood. https://t.co/igSuWa0h7J

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Syrians loved Assad. He could walk around and drive around Damascus and Syria without a huge security force. In fact, the Arab world loved him. In a 2009 Zogby poll - an American firm - Assad was the most popular leader in the region!

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Assad is also a good father and a husband. He raised smart, down-to-earth, and compassionate children. https://t.co/Esl2SA6Pnp

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Asma Assad was the ideal First Lady. https://t.co/B7eKsfKQnP

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

But for reasons discussed earlier, US and its evil friends decided to do a regime change in Syria. The "moderate rebels" were neither moderate nor rebels. They are low-IQ extremists & head-chopping terrorists aligned with Al Qaeda & ISIS. Al Qaeda = "Al Nusra" = "HTS" (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham)

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The US-funded "rebels" are murderous thugs who ruthlessly execute men and women. They would kill Shiites and Christians just because of the religion. They have destroyed numerous Shiite shrines & mosques and Christian churches. #Syria https://t.co/3TDiBEjUmx

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

"Syrian" rebels are actually jihadists from all over the world, including Uyghurs from Xinjiang, China. These fanatics have terrorist camps for their own children, who are brainwashed to become even suicide bombers. This is not a "popular uprising against President Assad." https://t.co/3K30d3eSOQ

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

While US/NATO-funded terrorists targeted Christians, it was #Assad who protected #Christianity in all its forms. When the rebels destroyed historic Christian monasteries, Assad visited and rebuilt them. All the church leaders in Syria have repeatedly spoken in favor of Assad, but the US media deliberately ignore them.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

US actively planned regime change in Syria as early as 2004. In 2005, CNN's Christiane Amanpour interviewed President Assad, when she brazenly told him that the US is funding Syrian opposition & trying to oust him in a coup.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister President, the U.S. is pushing for regime change in Syria, seeking a new leader and isolating you diplomatically. What are your thoughts on this? I am confident because my identity is rooted in Syria, not the U.S. Decisions about Syria should be made by the Syrian people alone. What if there were an alternative to you? Who could that be? Any Syrian could be an alternative; there are many eligible candidates. However, no one who is influenced by foreign powers should hold the presidency. This is a fundamental principle for us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister President, you know the rhetoric of regime change is headed towards you from the United States. They are actively looking for a new Syrian leader. They're granting visas and and, visits to Syrian opposition politicians. They're talking about isolating you diplomatically and perhaps a coup d'etat or your regime crumbling. What are you thinking about that? Speaker 1: I feel very confident for one reason. Because I was made in Syria. I wasn't made in the United States, so I'm not worried. This is Syrian decision. It should be should be made by the Syrian people. Nobody else in this world. So we don't discuss it in Syria in Syria. Speaker 0: What would happen, do you think, if there was a an alternative to you? Who is the alternative to you? Speaker 1: Could be any Syrian. Any national Syria, and we have a lot. I'm not the only person, who is eligible to be president. We have a lot of Syrians. So we don't have any any problem about that. But no Syrian would be allowed to be president if he's made anywhere outside our borders. This is a Syrian principle.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Under George W. Bush, the US secretly recruited and funded opposition leaders in Syria. But Assad kept winning elections. Later, US State Dept. gave millions of dollars to establish a TV station ("Barada TV") to broadcast anti-Assad propaganda within Syria. #Wikileaks https://t.co/Kis8SNXnGh

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

2011 saw the biggest regime-change operations ever conducted by the US. It was called the Arab Spring. In Egypt, Mubarak was ousted. In Libya, Gaddafi was murdered by NATO. And so on. But Syria was the exception, because Assad was very popular with people and the military.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Thus, US deep state recruited Al Qaeda (AQ). Feb 12, 2012: AQ leader Zawahiri called jihadists all over the world to go to Syria & fight Assad ("cancerous regime"). Same day: Jake Sullivan - advisor of Hillary Clinton - sent an email: "Al Qaeda (AQ) is on our side in Syria"

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Islamic terrorism on steroids Remember how the CIA armed the Mujahideen with guns and shoulder-powered stinger missiles to defeat the USSR in the 1980s? It was 1000x worse in Syria, where Al Qaeda was given tanks, powerful rockets, mortars, "hell canons" etc. #Assad

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

US weapons had an elaborate rat line that involved Azerbaijan's diplomatic airplanes, Saudi Arabia and finally through Turkey. Al Qaeda and ISIS got weapons worth billions of dollars. The CIA named its project, "Operation Timber Sycamore." #Syria #Assad https://t.co/mxaJGY3I9v

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

"Salafists, Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood" US government and media were fooling the world, but US soldiers and intelligence officers in the field knew that they were training & arming the same people who did 9/11. Some Green Beret (US Special Forces) talked about it. General Flynn also wrote the famous memo in 2012, where he told the Pentagon that the groups that opposed Assad consisted of "Al Qaeda, Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood." For that, Flynn was fired! He later joined Trump's campaign.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

US and Israel were openly supporting ISIS on one side and then using ISIS as an excuse to bomb Syria. Israeli officials, Kissinger, Thomas Friedman (NY Times) etc. praised ISIS for countering Iran. https://t.co/dll5rjJGb8

Saved - January 1, 2025 at 9:48 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The jihadi movement generally, was knowingly, deliberately, willfully encouraged, supplied, trained, armed, equipped, and bolstered by the Western allies of NATO, the US, Israel, and the Deep State generally. Facts 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/ZXh0lA80Tt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The deep state's open support for Al Qaeda and the Islamic State (ISIS) is shocking, especially given their role in the Syrian conflict. Despite claiming to oppose Al Qaeda, the U.S. has provided support to groups aligned with them in Syria, raising questions about the rationale behind such actions. There are concerns about backing the wrong factions, with evidence suggesting that U.S. weapons may have ended up with ISIS. Former officials have indicated that the Obama administration ignored warnings about ISIS's rise, and even John Kerry acknowledged the situation's escalation. Historical parallels are drawn to past U.S. support for Mujahideen in Afghanistan, highlighting the long-term consequences of such interventions. The narrative emphasizes the complexity and contradictions in U.S. foreign policy regarding jihadist groups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Absolutely, completely, gob stopping, joss jaw dropping in the brazenness with which they the lackeys of the deep state openly praised and were openly siding with Al Qaeda. No. Of course, we don't want to we we we have to be careful and we don't want them to take over entirely blah blah blah blah blah. It's absolutely insane to think that in the pages of CFR, they're openly talking about the influx of jihadis bringing discipline and religious fervor and battle experience from Iraq. Oh, you mean, you know, killing American soldiers, let alone Iraqis? Yeah. Awesome. It's absolutely incredible, the double think that went on in this. But that's just one example. As I say, in the documentable path of how the Islamic State, ISIS, and, of course, the jihadi movement generally was knowingly, deliberately, willfully encouraged, supplied, trained, armed, equipped, and bolstered by the Western Allies of NATO, the US, Israel, and the deep state generally. The war against Syria, a war waged in conjunction with the ongoing war in Iraq and fought via Al Qaeda linked proxy forces and an Islamic State militia trained by American forces. Speaker 1: There is a great irony here in the sense that if you wanted to believe in an expansive definition of the 2,001 use of authorization of force, It says go after Al Qaeda and associated forces. Well, Al Qaeda and associated forces are opposing Assad. So if you wanna believe in an expansive definition of the 2,001 AUMF, you might believe that you could actually support Assad with arms, That the original use of authorization of force actually would justify giving arms to Assad. And I'm not proposing that. But I am proposing that you will be giving arms to the side that is fighting against Assad that has elements of Al Qaeda. Speaker 2: So if Al Qaeda is our sworn enemy, why is the United States supporting Al Qaeda fighters as part of the Syrian opposition just as we did Al Qaeda fighters in the Libyan uprising? Well, that was the question I posed to president Obama during my 1 on 1 interview with him. You mentioned about Al Qaeda during your speech, going after Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, certainly going after them in Yemen as well. And yet there's some concern about the US funding, the Syrian opposition when there are a lot of reports that Al Qaeda is kind of heading up that opposition. How do you justify the 2? Speaker 3: Well, I, I share that concern. And so, what we've done is to say, we will provide nonlethal assistance to Syrian opposition leadership that are committed to a political transition, committed to, a, an observance of human rights. Speaker 4: Well, in the video, the commander has he goes by the name of Abu Bakr. He has, found a man, a soldier from the Syrian Army dead, by bullet I've been told and he took a knife and he cut out a, a hole in the chest and pulled out the lungs and the hearts and while being videotaped he held up the lung and said, you dogs of Bashar, this is this is how we will treat you, I'll eat your hearts and your livers and, he took a bite in the video and, it was meant as a message to the regime. Speaker 5: Syria we backed I believe in some cases some of the wrong people and, not in the right part of the Free Syrian Army, and that's a little confusing to people. So I've always maintained to go back quite some time that we were backing the wrong types. I think it's gonna turn out maybe this weekend in a new special that Brett Baer is gonna have Friday that's gonna show some of those weapons from Benghazi ended up in the hands of ISIS. So we helped build ISIS. Now there's a danger there, and I'm with you. Speaker 6: Several weeks ago, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Michael Flynn, made waves in the media when he told Al Jazeera the Obama administration turned a blind eye to warnings that the self proclaimed Islamic State was on the rise. Speaking about a declassified DIA memo, which predicted the Islamic State's rise as a result of the West policy of backing Syrian rebels, Flynn told Jazirah's Mehdi Hasan the administration ignored his analysis saying, I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision. Speaker 0: WikiLeaks released audio from the September 22nd meeting in which John Kerry admitted to allowing the growth of ISIS. Speaker 7: The reason Russia came in is because ISO was getting stronger. DASH was threatening the possibility of going to Damascus and so forth. And that's why Russia came in because they didn't want a DASH government And they supported Assad. And and, and we know that this would this was growing. We were watching. We saw that that DASH was growing in strength. And we thought Assad was red. We thought, however, we could probably manage, you know, that Assad might then negotiate instead of negotiating. You got Assad. That he got Putin said support it. Speaker 8: We also have a history of kind of moving in and out of Pakistan. I mean, let's remember here, the people we are fighting today, we funded 20 years ago. And we did it because we were locked in this struggle with the Soviet Union. They invaded Afghanistan, and we did not wanna see them control Central Asia. And we went to work. And it was president Reagan in partnership with the Congress, led by Democrats who said, you know what? Sounds like a pretty good idea. Let's deal with the ISI and the Pakistani military, and let's go recruit these Mujahideen. And let's great. Let's get some to come from Saudi Arabia and other places importing their Wahhabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union. And guess what? They retreated. They lost 1,000,000,000 of dollars, and it led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. So there's a a very strong argument, which is wasn't a bad investment to end the Soviet Union, but let's be careful what we sow because we will harvest. So we then left Pakistan. We said, okay. Fine. You deal with the stingers that we've left all over your country. You deal with the mines that are along the border. And by the way, we don't wanna have anything to do with you. In fact, we're sanctioning you. So we stopped dealing with the Pakistani military and with ISI, and we now are making up for a lot of lost time.
Saved - January 4, 2025 at 3:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it telling that Israel is increasing its hasbara budget for 2025, especially as it faces attacks from groups that typically don't target Israel. This situation seems to echo the media narrative before the Iraq War, blurring the lines between Palestinians and ISIS.

@_whitneywebb - Whitney Webb

Kind of telling that Israel significantly ups its hasbara budget for 2025 (usually focused on Americans and Europeans) and now attacks from terror groups that never attack Israel (despite being "radical Islamists") and have provable CIA-Mossad ties have unleashed a convenient wave of media slop that echoes that which preceded the Iraq War and which also (conveniently for Israel) conflates Palestinians with ISIS.

Saved - January 8, 2025 at 2:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it interesting how questioning 9/11 narratives seems to unsettle certain groups, as it disrupts their ability to promote familiar stories using the same figures. It's important to clarify that those who explore 9/11 truths do not support Al Qaeda or see them as heroes; rather, they view Al Qaeda as a tool of US intelligence. It's hard to ignore the fact that US presidential administrations have historically supported Al Qaeda in Syria for regime change, which complicates the narrative around who truly backs them.

@_whitneywebb - Whitney Webb

Apparently, questioning 9/11 narratives bothers the terrorists at the CIA because it inhibits their ability to sell you narratives that utilize the same boogeymen they created over and over. No 9/11 truther "backs" Al Qaeda or views them as "rebels". The overwhelming view in 9/11 truth is that Al Qaeda is a proxy for the intelligence services of the US or a US ally. You can't blame 9/11 truth when the actual people "backing" Al Qaeda are the consecutive US presidential administrations that backed Al Qaeda in Syria for (now successful) regime change purposes.

@DMichaelTripi - Dominic Michael Tripi

WATCH: Former CIA agent tells Shawn Ryan that questioning 9/11 narratives helps terrorists. https://t.co/hpKgPOMPzR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Building 7 conspiracy theories are intriguing. There have been discussions about how to manipulate these beliefs to increase distrust in the government. Some individuals view Al Qaeda as revolutionaries and heroes opposing the government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I kind of found the Building 7 conspiracy stuff fascinating. And they have actually had discussions about how can we could do ruses and bring in the Building 7 people to make them blame their government more. So they're actually even looking at our conspiracies and targeting those people for the homeland attack. So, basically, those people almost back Al Qaeda as revolutionaries and rebels and heroes against our government.
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 7:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on Trump's recent repost highlighting Netanyahu's influence on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the wars in Iraq and Syria. I believe Trump understands the deeper connections, even if he can't express them outright. I pointed out how Obama and Hillary were seen as agents of Israel, allegedly supporting groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Trump’s actions during his administration, such as halting funding to these groups, were significant. General Flynn also seems aware of these dynamics, reinforcing the idea that many know the truth behind U.S. involvement in these conflicts.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

⚡️Trump just reposted a video explaining that the wars in Iraq and Syria came from Netanyahu Netanyahu “is STILL trying to get us to fight Iran to this day” “He’s gotten us into endless wars and because of the power of all of this in the U.S. politics, he’s gotten his way” This is the same Jeffrey Sachs that explained the “Greater Israel” agenda on Tucker Carlson and that the wars in the Middle East happened because Israel controls US foreign policy. ⚡️TRUMP KNOWS. Nothing is what it seems.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Syrian war narrative is false, stating Obama ordered the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government four years before Russia intervened. They allege the New York Times rarely reported on Operation Timber Sycamore, the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. Regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the speaker asserts it was based on phony pretenses and that focus groups were used to determine how to sell the war to the American public. They claim the war originated from Netanyahu's theory that toppling Iraq, Syria, and Iran was the only way to eliminate Hamas and Hezbollah. The speaker accuses Netanyahu of pushing the US into endless wars and still trying to instigate a war with Iran. They dismiss the idea of "democracy versus dictatorship" as sensible terms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Syria. And you may actually hear from grown up reporters who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that, oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened? What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Three times in ten years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative. Why did The US invade Iraq in 02/2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the February to find out what would sell that war to the American people. Abe Schultzky, if you wanna know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war. Where did that war come from? You know what? It's quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually. You know that? It's weird. And the way it is is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we're gonna get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And the guy's nothing if not obsessive. And we're he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week. He's a deep, dark son of a bitch. Sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us into endless wars, and because of the power of all of this, in The US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship? Come on. This is these are not even sensible terms.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Trump KNOWS this but can’t say it outright …yet

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Which one of our “so called allies” do you think Trump is talking about here? He even said that he can’t say it, but he’s given plenty of signals that he knows. https://t.co/OYc0eMqhIL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some allies that the U.S. works with and protects militarily are sending massive amounts of money to ISIS and Al Qaeda. When asked which countries are doing this, the speaker states, "You know who it is." The speaker then confirms that Saudi Arabia is one of the countries funding these groups, stating, "They're doing it. Everybody knows that." When asked about other countries involved, the speaker says there are others but declines to name them due to having relationships with people from those countries. The speaker asserts that "everybody knows that, and nobody says it."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of our so called allies that we work with and we protect and we protect them militarily, they're sending massive amounts of money to ISIS and to Al Qaeda. So who who who are you talking who are you talking about there? You know who it is. What do I have to bring it up for? You know who it because you're running for countries, Jay, Joe. Saudi? Joe, other countries are giving massive amounts of money. People from other countries are giving massive amounts of money. Are you talking are you saying the Saudis are doing this? They're doing it. Everybody knows that. Okay. Any any other countries? There are, but I'm not gonna say it because I have a lot of relationships with people. But there are. And you know that, and everybody knows that, and nobody says it. Nobody.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

He already told us if you were paying attention.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Listen very carefully: Trump knows who the deep state really is. https://t.co/YIK779gW83

Video Transcript AI Summary
They lied, claiming Saddam was developing nuclear weapons. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, but there were none, and they knew it. They claimed removing Saddam would have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Going into Iraq may have been the worst decision any president has made in the history of the country. We should have never been in Iraq.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They lied. Okay. They said Speaker 1: Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever. They lied. Okay. Speaker 0: They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Okay. Alright. Speaker 1: No question whatsoever. They look. Bottom line, there Speaker 0: were no weapons of mass destruction. They said there are weapons of mass destruction. Speaker 1: If you take out Saddam, I guarantee that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Speaker 0: Going into Iraq may have been the worst decision anybody has made, any president has made in the history of this country. That's how bad it is. Okay? We should have never been in Iraq. Speaker 1: I guarantee you. No question whatsoever.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

This is critical to understand. Despite what it appeared on the surface, Obama and Hillary were agents of Israel.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Wikileaks revealed an email from Hillary Clinton that said: “the best way to help Israel is to overthrow the G0V of Syria.” Once you realize that Hillary Clinton and Obama were aiding AIQaida and lSlS because Israel runs US foreign policy, everything will begin to make sense. https://t.co/uMaIPqOt46

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a leaked 2012 email, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the best way to help Israel is to use force in Syria to overthrow the government. The speaker questions why the American secretary of state would be willing to use American troops and money to overthrow the Syrian government, asserting there is no American interest in doing so. The speaker claims she is doing it to help Israel. The speaker believes this should be considered treason.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's Hillary Clinton, secretary of state in 2012. She said in in one of those emails that was leaked by, WikiLeaks, she said the best way to help Israel is to use force in Syria to overthrow the government. Now why is the American secretary of state willing to use American troops and American money to overthrow the government of Syria? There's no American interest there. She's doing it to help Israel. This should be considered treason.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Trump stopped funding lsraeI’s proxy terrorist lSlS/AIQaida groupsand pulled troops from lsraeI’s war in Syria during his last administration. This is why they tried to stop him and it cannot be overstated.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Trump was stopping Israel from overthrowing Syria in his last admin. He’s against their 7 wars for ‘Greater Israel’ plan so they’re trying to do as much damage as they can before he returns. https://t.co/W1v29GUN6L

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker stated the world would be better off with Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi in power. Iraq used to kill terrorists immediately, but now it's the "Harvard of terrorism." The speaker said that while Hussein was a horrible guy, Iraq was better then than it is now, as it is currently a training ground for terrorists. The speaker stated nobody even knows Libya, and there is no Iraq and no Libya anymore because it's all broken up. Human rights abuses are happening now and are worse than under Hussein or Gaddafi. Libya is a catastrophe, Iraq is a disaster, and the whole Middle East blew up around Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But you also recently said that the Middle East would be better off with Qaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Assad in power. How does I didn't say Assad, but we certainly have not gained anything with Qaddafi. And you you look at what happened. I mean, look at Libya. Look at Iraq. Iraq used to be no terrorist. He would kill the terrorists immediately. It was like now it's the Harvard of terrorism. Iraq. If you look at Iraq from years ago, I'm not saying he was a nice guy. Was a horrible guy, but it was a lot better than it is right now. Right now, Iraq is a training ground for terrorists. Right now, Libya, nobody even knows Libya. Frankly, there is no Iraq and there is no Libya. It's all broken up. They have no control. Nobody knows what's going on. The world would be better off with Saddam Hussein A 100%. And Gaddafi in power? A 100%. As far as Assad is concerned. What about the human rights abuses? Let's talk well, you don't think they're happening now? They're worse now than they ever were. People are getting their heads chopped off. They're being drowned. They've right now, they're far worse than they were ever under Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi. I mean, look what happened. Libya is a catastrophe. You look at our ambassador as an example. Okay? Libya is a disaster. Iraq is a disaster. Syria is a the whole Middle East. And it all blew up around Hillary Clinton and around Barack Obama. It all blew up.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

lSlS/AIQaida = lsraeI/ClA

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

The New Orleans terror suspect had an ISIS flag on truck but you’re supposed to forget that Israel armed and funded ISIS and AI Qaeda, along with the US deep state, (Israel.) https://t.co/ODRTU5SmwS

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Obama and Hillary funded, trained and armed lSlS & AIQaida because lsraeI runs US foreign policy.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

The reason Obama never wanted to take out lSlS is because he was really just a puppet of lsraeI & the ClA. https://m.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1009/S00027/obama-and-his-family-tied-to-cia-for-years.htm https://t.co/nr3T1YAXct

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Does anyone REALLY believe Iran’s true controllers actually changed after 1979? The Iran-Contra affair, where a cabal of US/Israel officials covertly conspired with Iran — started in 1980, IMMEDIATELY after the fake 1979 Islamic Revolution

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Listen very carefully: This is THE SAME Jeffrey Sachs who TRUMP JUST REPOSTED⚡️

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

This is the most important 13 minutes you can listen to right now to understand what is happening. America has only been going war on behalf Israel to expand their regional ambitions of “Greater Israel.” Syria was only overthrown for Israel. Jefferey Sachs explains perfectly: https://t.co/snUz84yxfA

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, regime change in Syria is part of Netanyahu's 30-year war to remake the Middle East, a disaster that continues. Referencing Wesley Clark, the speaker claims the neocons and Israelis planned seven wars in five years to remake the Middle East, listing Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan as targets. The speaker alleges this plan originated with Netanyahu's "Clean Break" strategy in 1996, aiming for a "greater Israel" by dismantling governments supporting Palestinians. They claim the U.S., on behalf of Israel, has engaged in six of these wars, with Iran potentially being the seventh. The speaker states that Obama initiated the Syrian war in 2011, with Hillary Clinton declaring "Assad must go." They cite an IMF report praising Syria's economic growth before the conflict, arguing it posed no threat to the U.S. The speaker claims Netanyahu views any support for Palestinians as a threat to his vision of "greater Israel," encompassing annexed territories and potentially land from the Nile to the Euphrates, achieved through war rather than diplomacy. Obama's Operation Timber Sycamore allegedly involved the CIA working with Turkey and Saudi Arabia to overthrow Assad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of a sudden the government in Syria changed. There was regime change in Syria. Who did that? Why? And what does it mean? Speaker 1: Well, it's part of a thirty year effort. This is Netanyahu's war to remake the Middle East. It's been a disaster. It continues to be a disaster. But as Netanyahu himself said after Assad left, we have remade the Middle East. And so it has to be understood as something that didn't just happen in a week, but has been an ongoing war throughout The Middle East. Maybe the right way to understand what's happened with Syria is to think back to a really remarkable occasion when Wesley Clark, the general who headed NATO, went to the Pentagon just after nineeleven, and famously he was showed a piece of paper that said, we're gonna have seven wars in five years, and he was completely dumbfounded. He said, what does this have to do with anything? And he was told that the neocons and the Israelis are gonna remake the Middle East. And the seven countries on the list are very telling. They were Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and then in Africa, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. And seven countries, we've been at war in six of them now. And I mean, we, The United States, on behalf of Israel, including in Syria. And so what happened in Syria last week was the culmination of a long term effort by Israel to reshape the Middle East in its image. That started with Netanyahu and his American advisors in 1996 in something called Clean Break, which was a political document that the Americans and Netanyahu made when Netanyahu became prime minister. After 09/11, it went into full gear with the Iraq wars being the first of those wars. Speaker 0: Clean break, what does that refer to? Speaker 1: Clean break is we're going to make a clean break of the Middle East. Speaker 0: A break with the past. Speaker 1: We're going to break with the past. We're not going to have land for peace, which is the idea that Israel would have a Palestinian state next door. No, we're going to have greater Israel, and we're just going to bash anybody that doesn't like it, and we're going to do that by bringing down any government that supports the Palestinians. It's a rather shocking amount of hubris. It has been, in my view, a complete disaster for The United States and for The Middle East. It has been Netanyahu's MO since 1996 actually, and he's been prime minister more than half the time since then. And The United States goes to war on his behalf, And what happened in Syria is the culmination of that effort. So seven wars in five years. Netanyahu came to The US in '19 in 02/2002, excuse me, after nineeleven. Actually, he came in 09/20/2001, if I remember correctly, and gave a speech that said, There's terrorism, but you don't fight the terrorists, you fight the governments that back the terrorists. That's the idea. So you go to war. You don't just have a kind of an anti terrorism effort, you go to war. And the first of those wars was Iraq, but Syria was supposed to be exactly the next war. And the timeline was this remarkable idea of seven wars in five years. According to all of the understanding that we now have from lots of insiders, from documents, from the archives, what happened was The US got bogged down in Iraq. There was the insurgency. We didn't move onward to the next war, which was to be Syria, which was to happen already twenty years ago. But in 2011, what really brought Assad down last week started under Obama. And yes, and this is also interesting. It doesn't really matter who's president. This is long term deep state policy. Obama ordered the CIA to overthrow Assad. So that started in 2011. Speaker 0: But why would Obama want to overthrow Assad? Because Speaker 1: Israel has run American foreign policy in The Middle East for thirty years. That's how it works. We have an Israel lobby. We have this clean break strategy. We have a plan for seven wars in five years. And what's interesting is they actually kind of carry out this madness. They don't explain any of it to the American people. They don't tell anybody, but you can watch step by step. We've had six of those seven wars. The only one that hasn't happened is Iran. And if you watch every day now, the MSM, the mainstream media is pushing for US war with Iran. Netanyahu's pushing for war with Iran. They're really trying to get this started to make seven out of seven. But Obama, for no particular reason, by the way, but he launched two of these wars on the list of seven. He launched the war to bring down the Libyan government, Muammar Gaddafi, in the fall of Or the war started in March 2011, and he and Hillary Clinton, his secretary of state, said Assad must go in the spring of twenty eleven. I remember scratching my head at the time saying, oh, that's interesting. How are they going to do that? Syria was a normal functioning country at the time, despite whatever you read, whatever propaganda is said, Syria was a normal functioning country. I recently dredged out a report by the International Monetary Fund on Syria in 2009 that praised the Syrian government for its reforms and its rapid economic growth, and looked forward to continued years of economic development. In other words, it was not this wasteland or this battlefield. It was an actual normal country. Speaker 0: Was it a threat to The United States? Speaker 1: It was no threat to The United States whatsoever, but it was deemed to be by Netanyahu a threat to Israel because of a simple reason, which is that Netanyahu wants to control all of Palestine, wants to rule over the Palestinian people, does not want a Palestinian state, and that has led to militant opposition. That's led to Hamas, that's led to Hezbollah, that's led to other groups. Netanyahu's theory is, well, we're never going to allow a Palestinian state, so we have to bring down any government that supports those militant groups against us, because our core aim is greater Israel. That's not much of a worthy cause, by the way. Having a Palestinian state next door and having peace could have saved probably a million lives by now over the last thirty years, but that's not Netanyahu's crazy ambition, which is- Speaker 0: What is greater Israel? Speaker 1: Greater Israel means, depending on how crazy the people are, either that Israel controls not only its geographic territory, but that it essentially controls or annexes the West Bank, the Golan Heights, which they've just enlarged Gaza. Golan Heights being part of Syria historically. It was part of Syria. It's claimed by Israel, and now with an expanded territory, and East Jerusalem. So everything that was captured in 1967, Netanyahu explicitly said, We're never giving that back. Now there are two motivations for that. One, Netanyahu says, Not safe to give it back because he doesn't want to negotiate any kind of peace or any state of Palestine. Then there are religious zealots, I would use even stronger terms, who use the book of Joshua, which is two thousand seven hundred years ago that said, well, God gave us everything from the river in Egypt, meaning the Nile, to the Euphrates. And there are zealots in Israel, and they're in the government who believe, yes, this is God's ordinance. We're going to take whatever we want. So the Niles to the Euphrates would include what? Well, you take the greater view of this, would include Lebanon, it would include Syria, it would include part of Iraq, it would include part of Egypt. And some of these people actually quote the Bible and say, we're going to do this. And it's a little sad and absolutely terribly frightening. But I'd say the more narrow vision is what they call from the river to the sea, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean. That's taken as a pro Palestinian chant, but it's exactly the opposite. It is the greater Israel literal vision of the government of Israel. It's the literal idea. There happened to be 7,000,000 Palestinians there. That's a minor problem. Maybe they can be ethnically cleansed. Maybe they can be thrown out. Maybe they can just be ruled in a military dominant way. Of course, probably well over 100,000 have been killed in the most recent war by Israel. Official count, 45,000 of bodies claimed from the rubble, but we know that there are a lot more that have died since this war in Gaza began. But all of this is to say, this greater Israel idea says we can't make peace with the Palestinians, so anyone that supports the Palestinians is by definition a mortal threat to us, and when you have a mortal threat, you must destroy it. And so this is the opposite of diplomacy. It's war. And as Netanyahu crowed last week, it's war to remake the Middle East. It's all spelled out, by the way, in very clear ways, but you have to dig for them. You have to find them. You have to understand that this is longstanding. You have to understand that each president has played part of that role. So when we come back to Obama, he started the war with Syria in 2011. I can remember actually vividly the call that Assad must go. And yeah, I did scratch my head. I was actually, I think it was on Morning Joe when it was said, and I was asked by Joe Scarborough, What do you think? And I said, Well, that's pretty odd. How's he going to do that? It turned out it was going to be thirteen years of mass war, 300,000 dead and destroying a country. That's what it turned out to be. But Obama signed an order called Operation Timber Sycamore. People should look it up. You can find it online, but you can't find it in the mainstream media because it's not discussed. But it was a so called presidential finding that the CIA should work with Turkey, with Saudi Arabia, with others to overthrow the government of Syria. So that was the plan. We went to war.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Oh, BTW - General Flynn knows too.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Our job is to say the things they can’t. MIL-CIV alliance. They know. https://t.co/74XYZcZIKc

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

A couple days later, he doubled down. They know.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

🔥General Flynn just spotlighted a thread implicating Israel and the deep state of the U.S. (Israel) for being behind ISIS, AIQaida and the regime change in Syria. It even mentions “Greater Israel.” I keep saying this but THEY KNOW. This is very encouraging to see from him. Thank you @GenFlynn for speaking out.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

A MUST READ THREAD (exceptional analysis and reporting—really well done). So what? Be careful what you ask for. “Want to know Syria's future? Look at Idlib -- the province under "rebels" control.” https://t.co/uZaETvpvF6

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

⚡️

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Irregular warfare Nothing is what it seems ++ https://t.co/qhm7vMayv3

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 8:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2015, Israel allegedly used tactical neutron bombs in Yemen, contributing to a devastating bombing campaign that has resulted in one of the worst humanitarian crises of the 21st century. Neutron bombs emit significantly more neutron radiation compared to standard fission bombs. Despite widespread acknowledgment of these nuclear events, some still deny them. The U.S. was aware of Israel's actions and supported the Saudi-led invasion, exacerbating the situation. Currently, millions in Yemen face starvation and dire humanitarian needs due to the ongoing conflict and its consequences.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

RECALL: In 2015 Israel used tactical nukes on Yemen on behalf of their partner in crime Saudi Arabia, which developed into a 5 plus year bombing campaign and one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 21st century. 🧵

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

What kind of nuke did Israel use? It was a neutron bomb, or officially known as one type of Enhanced Radiation Weapon, which is a low yield fission-fusion thermonuclear weapon (hydrogen bomb) in which the burst of neutrons generated by a fusion reaction is intentionally allowed to escape the weapon, rather than being absorbed by its other components. The weapon’s radiation case, usually made from relatively thick uranium, lead or steel in a standard bomb, are instead made of as thin a material as possible to facilitate the greatest escape of fusion produced neutrons.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

Compared to a pure fission bomb with an identical explosive yield, a neutron bomb would emit about ten times the amount of neutron radiation. The neutrons emitted by a neutron bomb have a much higher average energy level (close to 14 MeV) than those released during a fission reaction (1–2 MeV).

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

At the time there was zero denial or refutation (other than by wingnuts and conspiracy theorists) of this having been a nuclear event nor has there been any effective denial of the pair of F-16A/Bs shot down over Yemen. Israel nuked Yemen, period. This is a hard fact that has been 100% confirmed by Pravda, Sputnik and other Russian media sites.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

America absolutely knew about Israel’s terrorist attacks on Yemen and supported it.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

Read this several times. America backed the Saudi/UAE invasion of Yemen for 9 years and Yemen faced one of the worst humanitarian disasters of the 21st century. The US sponsored a Yemeni civil war and the theft of Yemen’s resources. Socotra also remains illegally occupied by UAE. US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told the New York Times that the “disorder” in Yemen, greatly inflamed by the US-backed Saudi bombing campaign, has strengthened Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), allowing it to take more territory. “You have to remember that 40% of the population was food insecure way before the conflict. Now the situation is much more exacerbated by the attacks,” a Yemeni man told BBC. “Now there are long queues for food and for fuel as well. It’s a very dire situation.” In Yemen 7.3 million people are in danger of starving to death, described as being “on the brink of famine” by the report and a further 18.8 million people need humanitarian aid. This, according to the UN, is a “direct result of the behavior of parties to the conflict”, citing “indiscriminate attacks, attacks against civilians and protected objects, sieges, blockades and restrictions on movement”.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

@cjwerleman 🚨🇸🇦SAUDI and its allies led the genocide in Yemen. Learn some facts, and stop blaming Ansar’Allah! 👹The death toll of the US-UK-Saudi-Emirati war on Yemen is estimated to be at least 377,000 individuals, as of the end of 2021. 👹More than two-thirds of these Yemenis killed

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 12:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I questioned why Sunni-majority countries, particularly in the Gulf, did not combat ISIS during its invasions of Iraq and Syria. Ali Hatem al-Suleiman revealed that 95% of ISIS members are from Sunni tribes, indicating a complex relationship. Adnaan Aroor, another Sunni figure, was caught contradicting his claims about ISIS. I recalled how Hamas turned against Assad and supported Sunni rebels in Syria, while also noting ongoing atrocities committed by Sunni extremists. Additionally, I highlighted the role of Sunni informants in aiding U.S. military operations against Shia forces.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

RECALL: Why didn’t the Sunni majority countries (gulf states especially), fight off ISIS in Iraq and Syria? Why did they allow for the invasions to take place by this foreign, terrorist army? Why did Iran and Russia have to intervene? Ali Hatem al-Suleiman, the Strongest Sunni leader who led 100k+ Sunni militants to joining ISIS, explains why in the video below. Host: Why aren't you fighting against ISIS? Sunni: 95% of ISIS are our sons of our (Sunni) tribes. Now it can be proven that 95% of ISIS were Sunni Muslims and they were funded by Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Good find @hashedelesood

@hashedelesood - hashed

Ali Hatem al-Suleiman - Strongest Sunni who led 100k+ Sunni militants to joining ISIS Host: Why aren't you fighting against ISIS? Sunni: 95% of ISIS are our sons of our (Sunni) tribes Any Sunni Iraqi Terrorist that will lie & claim Shia factions battles سألعن دينك ودين أبوك

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

Another Sunni supremacist terrorist scholar Adnaan Aroor gets caught lying about his support of ISIS, of which he says 99% are believers of Sunni Islam.

@hashedelesood - hashed

Adnaan Aroor this Sunni Terrorist Scholar that can barely speak Arabic properly returns to Syria & Sunni world Is celebrating his return Here he denies supporting ISIS so the viewer proves the claim whereby he said 99% of ISIS are believers. I just cannot understand this Sect.

@umtikrit - أُميـة التكريتي 🇮🇶

بالتكبيرات ، وصول الشيخ #عدنان_العرعور إلى سوريا لأول مرة منذ 54 عامًا! اللهم أعد كل مغترب إلى أهله عزيزًا مرفوع الرأس.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

Recall when Palestinian Sunni supremacists turned on their gracious host Assad and aligned themselves with the invading Sunnis takfiri army in Syria:

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

🚨✡️FACT CHECK: Hamas members took up arms against Assad’s army during the foreign ISIS, Al-Qaeda FSA invasions of Syria that started in 2011! So they’re fair game! ✡️“Leaders of the Palestinian Sunni supremacist, terrorist movement Hamas turned publicly against their long-time ally President Bashar al-Assad of Syria on Friday, endorsing the revolt aimed at overthrowing his dynastic rule.” ✡️Breakaway fighters from Hamas's armed wing were using their expertise to assist Syrian rebels with tunnel building and rocket making. ✡️ It is not the first time that such suggestions were made. In April 2013, the London Times newspaper, citing unnamed Western diplomatic sources in contact with the Syrian government and opposition, claimed that the armed wing of Hamas, Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, were training rebel units belonging to Free Syrian Army. ✡️ "There are Palestinians from Gaza, who have split from Hamas or from smaller militant groups [but not from Islamic Jihad] and are fighting in Syria. They have special expertise in tunnel digging or rocket making," Ibrahim Khader, a Palestinian journalist covering the conflict in Syria, told MEE. ✡️ According to Khader's estimate, the total number of Palestinians who have joined the Syrian rebels from Gaza does not exceed 200, but, he adds, most of them are highly experienced in military skills, including making explosives.   ✡️ Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has long accused the Palestinian movement Hamas of arming and training Syrian rebels fighting against his rule following the March 2011 uprising, inspired by the Arab Spring. Hamas ditches Assad, backs Syrian revolt By Reuters February 24, 201211:13 AM CSTUpdated 13 years ago ✡️Hamas isn’t innocent! Who funds Hamas by the way?🤔 SOURCE: https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/how-did-hamass-military-expertise-end-syrias-rebels. Reuters

How did Hamas's military expertise end up with Syria's rebels? Breakaway fighters from Hamas's armed wing are using their expertise to assist Syrian rebels with tunnel building and rocket making middleeasteye.net

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

HTS/ISIS Sunni supremacists continue to mass murder innocent ethnic minorities in Syria, and brag about it.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

The U.S. military acquired its Intelligence on the Shia resistance operations in Iraq from Sunni sectarian sell outs who worked closely with U.S. intelligence to help the axis of the willing invaders, ISIS and Al Qaeda terrorist operations.

@hashedelesood - hashed

https://euaa.europa.eu/country-guidance-iraq-2022/210-perceived-collaborators-western-armed-forces-organisations-or-companies European Union Agency for Asylum Report Iraqi Sunnis were given Asylum to work as translators against Shia resistance🙃 They translated for U.S. military during: House raids Detainee interrogations HUMINT operations Surveillance of militia communications

2.10. (Perceived) collaborators of Western armed forces, organisations, or companies COMMON ANALYSIS Last updated: June 2022 This profile includes, in particular, individuals who are or were associated with the US forces and foreign ... euaa.europa.eu

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

More evidence of Al Qaeda suicide bombings and who authorized them:

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

RECALL: In 2013 Iraqi Intelligence captured an Al Qaeda Sunni, takfiri terrorist who was under Al-Jolani’s authority. The terrorist stated that Al- Jolani Is the senior LEADER that was orchestrating terror attacks & he preferred suicide bombings. Below is footage from 2013:

@hashedelesood - hashed

RARE 2013 Footage Iraqi Intelligence catch a terrorist personally under Jolanis authority. He says Jolani Is the senior LEADER that was orchestrating & preferred suicide bombings footage IN 2013 before he was a "somebody" If Jolani steps into Baghdad we won't touch him🙂

Saved - June 19, 2025 at 2:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The documents reveal that Tucker Carlson was not directly paid but that a PR firm was hired to arrange an interview, a common political practice. In contrast, another post highlights a $265,000 payment by the Congolese government for media pitches, dismissing it as a non-scandal. I emphasize that the focus on Tucker's connections to Qatar and its funding of terrorism raises serious concerns about his integrity and motivations, suggesting he is influenced by those interests while promoting narratives that align with them.

@seanmdav - Sean Davis

At no point does this document say Tucker was paid anything. It shows that a registered PR firm was paid to try and book an interview, which is probably one of the most innocuous and banal things that could ever be listed on a FARA filing and an activity that probably happens 10,000 times a day in politics, if not more.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Here’s the screenshot from the FARA documents filled out this year that prove Qatar paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for an interview between @TuckerCarlson and the Prime Minister of Qatar (the same Qatar which funds HAMAS) regarding the “war with Iran”. This was a paid propaganda piece in which over $200,000 was paid by the Embassy of the State of Qatar for Tucker to interview a Qatari official all while knowing HAMAS is an Iranian proxy and funded by Qatar. Qatar funds Islamic terror all around the world and they think they can just pay everyone off to make them turn a blind eye. The Qataris are global funders of Islamic terrorism and their money has been used to murder American citizens. These are not good people. Tucker Carlson wants you to think his thoughts on Iran are based and original, but he’s literally participating in paid for interviews by the Qataris, who are funding and providing pent houses and luxury lifestyles to the leaders of HAMAS in DOHA. Tucker should just be honest that he’s a mouthpiece for genocidal Muslims. His media company was literally funded by a MUSLIM investor who is half Pakistani and half Iranian and who spends a lot of time in Qatar. And trust me when I say a lot of people in pro-Trump circles are very uncomfortable with this. Tucker is controlled by Muslims. People need to wake up and stop pretending like this is a conspiracy theory. Qatar and Iran are buying off conservative podcasters to push pro-Islamist, anti-American and anti-Israel talking points to undermine President Trump.

@seanmdav - Sean Davis

Oh wow look at this the government in Congo paid $265,000 to a PR firm to pitch interviews to CNN and Fox News and the New York Times. What a huge scoop and amazing scandal this is, said the moron. Less than five seconds of searching by randomly throwing in network names shows how stupid this attempted hit is.

Saved - June 23, 2025 at 6:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Iran is often labeled a threat to U.S. national security, but I believe it's essential to examine the history behind this narrative. The U.S. has repeatedly intervened in Iran's affairs, from overthrowing its democratically elected government in 1953 to supporting Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War. We shot down a civilian plane and imposed harsh sanctions, while Iran complied with international agreements like the JCPOA. Despite being surrounded by U.S. military bases, Iran has fought against groups like ISIS. We must recognize the wrongs done to Iran and its people, questioning who the real threat is.

@KashifMD - Kashif Chaudhry

“Iran is a threat to U.S. national security.” Let’s break that down🧵 1953: The U.S. overthrew Iran’s democratically elected government to control its oil. We installed a monarch—the Shah—who ruled brutally, backed by CIA-run secret police (SAVAK) that tortured and disappeared dissenters.   1979: Iranian people finally rose up and overthrew the Shah. In the chaos, angry students took American embassy staff hostage—an illegal act, but notably, not a single hostage was killed.   1980s: The U.S. supported Saddam Hussein as he invaded Iran and used chemical weapons to wipe out entire Iranian villages. A million Iranians were killed. The chemical materials were shipped from the U.S. and the funding came via the CIA.   1988: The U.S. shot down Iran Air Flight 655, a civilian passenger plane, killing 290 innocent people, including 66 children. The flight had just taken off from Tehran and was flying in Iranian airspace. The U.S. never apologized for what it later claimed was “a mistake.” No one was held accountable. In fact, the ship’s captain received a medal the following year for his service.   1990s: After that came crippling sanctions and covert operations to sabotage Iran’s economy, scientists, and sovereignty—tactics that continue to this day. 2003– 2011: The U.S. topples Saddam. A million Iraqis are killed. Post-Saddam Iraqi leaders and militias resisting the U.S. occupation build close ties with Iran. 2010–2012: 6 Iranian nuclear scientists are assassinated, widely attributed to Israel’s Mossad, often with U.S. knowledge or coordination.   2015: Iran signed the JCPOA nuclear deal—agreeing to international inspections and limits on uranium enrichment. The UN confirmed Iran complied.   2018: Trump unilaterally withdrew from the deal. Iran is punished despite playing by the rules. Sanctions return—harsher than ever. 2019: Iran announces it will enrich uranium beyond the limit set in the deal, not to build a weapon, but to gain leverage for relief from the crippling sanctions devastating its economy. 2020: The U.S. assassinated Qassem Soleimani, Iran’s top general, in a drone strike on Iraqi soil. He wasn’t launching an attack, but was on a diplomatic mission, carrying Iran’s response to a peace offer from Saudi Arabia, according to Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi. 2023–2025: Iran’s allies (Houthis, Hezbollah, PMFs) begin resisting Israeli regional aggression, especially in response to its genocide in Gaza. 2025: 🚨 Trump bombs Iran following persistent lobbying from Israel. No Congressional approval. No evidence of an imminent threat. No regard for ongoing diplomatic talks. Meanwhile: 🛑 U.S. military bases surround Iran—in every neighboring country. 🇮🇷 Iran has none outside the region. 🛡️ Iran has consistently fought ISIS and al-Qaeda—yet is still branded “the world’s top sponsor of terror.” We need to be honest with ourselves: We have wronged Iran. We have wronged the Iranian people. Not just once—but over and over again. We invaded. We toppled. We assassinated. We bombed. And yet we call them the threat?

Saved - July 26, 2025 at 8:56 AM

@LaurynBahen - Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

🔥 The U.S Deep State, CIA, Democrats & Israel completely destroyed the Middle East. They put people in power to help with their agenda & when they put their people first then they were eliminated & entire regions of the Middle East fell & extremist Islamic terrorists took over.

Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:31 PM

@OunkaOnX - Ounka

Former CIA Tel Aviv Station Chief admits the truth: The U.S. and Israeli Mossad work hand-in-glove with terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. They manage it, fund it, and use it to topple governments and counter Iran. https://t.co/0yCGbQxoUk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses working with the Israelis, describing them as “very American” and noting that they could get into shouting matches during meetings over whose idea was best, followed by casual lunch and reconciliation. He emphasizes that Israel is a good ally that the U.S. needs to protect and support, and he asserts that CIA and Al Qaeda had worked closely together in Iraq and in Syria, and that there are times when covert action allowed meetings with the “quote unquote, enemies” to try to bring things down as CIA officers. Speaker 1 adds that most of the world has a problem with Al Qaeda and ISIS/Daesh, but there is less of a problem because the CIA worked with ISIS/Daesh and Al Qaeda. He suggests that if the CIA worked with them, it would be better to understand what they were doing, and if the plan is for the U.S. to work with them on a security agreement, which has been done with enemies before, then this has been done in concert with diplomats and other countries involved. He indicates he wouldn’t be surprised if that was happening and would call it possibly hopeful. Speaker 0 continues by noting that newspapers in the United States once celebrated Qasem Soleimani as a fighter with American troops against ISIS and Al Qaeda. He states that Soleimani “was, and now it's switched,” implying a shift in perception or policy. The overarching theme is the idea of collaboration or coordination with hostile or extremist groups in pursuit of broader strategic objectives, including countering Iran, and the possibility that such collaborations could be framed as necessary or hopeful within a complex web of alliances and covert actions. Speaker 0 ends by reiterating the shift in stance: “Now we have to go to al ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against Iran.” This underscores a cyclical or ironic pivot in U.S. strategy, moving from partnering with certain adversaries against common threats to reengaging those same groups to counter another adversary. The dialogue presents a candid view of realpolitik, suggesting that relationships with seemingly incompatible actors and shifts in alliances occur as part of broader geopolitical objectives, with collaboration sometimes described as acceptable when it serves strategic goals, and public narratives sometimes contrasting with behind-the-scenes actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now we have to go to al ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against, Iran. What I loved about working with the Israelis is they're very American. We could get into shouting matches during meetings sometimes. Not like we're super mad, but we're trying to really say, but my idea is best. When my idea is best kind of thing. And then we'd be like, hey. You wanna go have lunch? And we're all fine. You know? It was just a really it it's a really nice place to work. They're good allies of ours. We need to protect them. I do know for a fact that that we argue sometimes with them, but I also know for a fact that we're committed to helping protect them, keep their state. You mean CIA and Al Qaeda worked closely together in Iraq. Speaker 1: And Syria. And And in Syria to overthrow Assad, of course. Speaker 0: It's it's overthrow Assad and stuff like that. There were times when our covert action would allow us findings would allow us to go and actually have meetings and talk to the, quote unquote, enemies to try to bring things down as CIA officers. Speaker 1: Everyone, most of the world, has a problem with Al Qaeda and ISIS Daesh. Right. Right. You have less of a problem because the CIA worked with ISIS Daesh and al and Al Qaeda. Speaker 0: If we worked with them, we would know what they were doing better, that's for sure, and understand it. If the plan is for us to work with them, to work on a security agreement, which we have done with enemies before, and we've played that part as long as well as side by side with the diplomats, honestly, and whatever other countries are involved. And so I wouldn't be surprised if that was happening, and I would call it possibly hopeful. Speaker 1: In fact, that is why the newspapers once in The United States celebrated Qasem Soleimani, the as a fighter with the American troops against ISIS and Al Qaeda. Speaker 0: He was, and now it's switched. Now we have to go to als ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against Iran.
Saved - March 21, 2026 at 8:09 PM

@FurkanGozukara - Furkan Gözükara

OMG this is insane! A former CIA operative just admitted on camera that the US intentionally armed and relied on Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria just to serve Israel's geopolitical interests against Iran. They literally created the ISIS caliphate! https://t.co/4Oa4Y9FGya

Saved - March 21, 2026 at 8:04 PM

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

Dit is de top-10 terrorisme volgens de VS zelf. ISIS, Al-Shabaab. Boko Haram zijn allemaal bewapend en van geld voorzien door de VS/CIA/Mossad. Ik werd er destijds nog om uitgelachen door een zeer ongeinformeerd panel: https://t.co/Ow3XW0qEtr Maar inmiddels, hier een CIA agent die het ook zegt: https://t.co/oQnXN0eNtU n van Boko Haram is het zelfs toegegeven voor een Amerikaanse senaatscommissie. https://t.co/DYYE8cU2Xy Dus de top van het terrorisme, is niet afkomstig van Iran, maar van de VS/Israël.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Gezichtspunt. Maar dat hele bijzondere gezichtspunt dat is overal terug te horen. Zelfs Bokoe Haram en Isis, dat zijn natuurlijk gewoon proxy legers van de Verenigde Staten. Dat is ook buiten twijfel. Bokoe Haram, het begon destijds, ik zal even heel kort wat geschiedenis lesgeven, begon destijds toen Afghanistan werd binnengevallen door de VS, maar dat deed de VS niet zelf. Dat deden ze door de in Pakistan opgeleide Moedjhadin, waarop die regering en natuurlijk Rusland te hulp vroeg. De USSSR destijds. Dat was de eerste keer dat ik het zag. Zijn proxy legers. Nou ISIS is een proxy leger. Wie hebben wie hebben Syrië en Irak bevrijd van dat Amerikaanse proxy leger? Dat waren natuurlijk hisbola, Palestijnse leger, Rusland en Iran. Die hebben nota bene Iran hebben ISIS daaruit geslagen. Boka-Arab, zelfde verhaal, maar Isis eruit geslagen? Ja, ja de Syrië, deze Syrië zijn bevrijd door Rusland, door Hezbollah. Bedoel ook vanaf 2014? 2014. Dat was toch Amerika? Nee die hebben nu die hebben nu het oosten van Syrië bezet gehouden hé. Die pikken daar de olie. Dus die hebben een deel, een een land veel groter dan Oekraïne houden ze nou bezet. Samen met hun Koerdische partners. Maar weet je dit zijn gezichtspunten, maar in de geopolitiek is het vrij geaccepteerd gezichtspunt dat Bokoe Haram, Al Qaida, al onze Moderate Rebles, Easis, dat zijn Amerikaanse proxy legers met heel veel steun in dit conflict, in het Syrië conflict van Turkije en en Israël trouwens. Hamas hadden we het over
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gezichtspunt. Maar dat hele bijzondere gezichtspunt dat is overal terug te horen. Zelfs Bokoe Haram en Isis, dat zijn natuurlijk gewoon proxy legers van de Verenigde Staten. Dat is ook buiten twijfel. Bokoe Haram, het begon destijds, ik zal even heel kort wat geschiedenis lesgeven, begon destijds toen Afghanistan werd binnengevallen door de VS, maar dat deed de VS niet zelf. Dat deden ze door de in Pakistan opgeleide Moedjhadin, waarop die regering en natuurlijk Rusland te hulp vroeg. De USSSR destijds. Dat was de eerste keer dat ik het zag. Zijn proxy legers. Nou ISIS is een proxy leger. Wie hebben wie hebben Syrië en Irak bevrijd van dat Amerikaanse proxy leger? Dat waren natuurlijk hisbola, Palestijnse leger, Rusland en Iran. Die hebben nota bene Iran hebben ISIS daaruit geslagen. Boka-Arab, zelfde verhaal, maar Isis eruit geslagen? Ja, ja de Syrië, deze Syrië zijn bevrijd door Rusland, door Hezbollah. Bedoel ook vanaf 2014? 2014. Dat was toch Amerika? Nee die hebben nu die hebben nu het oosten van Syrië bezet gehouden hé. Die pikken daar de olie. Dus die hebben een deel, een een land veel groter dan Oekraïne houden ze nou bezet. Samen met hun Koerdische partners. Maar weet je dit zijn gezichtspunten, maar in de geopolitiek is het vrij geaccepteerd gezichtspunt dat Bokoe Haram, Al Qaida, al onze Moderate Rebles, Easis, dat zijn Amerikaanse proxy legers met heel veel steun in dit conflict, in het Syrië conflict van Turkije en en Israël trouwens. Hamas hadden we het over

@FurkanGozukara - Furkan Gözükara

OMG this is insane! A former CIA operative just admitted on camera that the US intentionally armed and relied on Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria just to serve Israel's geopolitical interests against Iran. They literally created the ISIS caliphate!

@ricwe123 - Richard

Did you know Washington was using USAID to fund Boko Haram a jihadist group responsible for terror attacks in Nigeria, Cameroon, Niger and Chad? Now you do..... (US Congressman Scott Perry)

@ClimateAudit - Stephen McIntyre

According to the State Department's own reporting in their 2022 report on Global Terrorism, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2022_Statistical_Annex_Final__508_Compliant.pdf , none of the top ten terrorist groups, ranked by fatalities, were connected to Iran. However, there is evidence that some of them, maybe all of them, have received funding or weapons from Israel or US (USAID, CIA).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that USAID funding amounts to supporting terrorism and that the money flows through programs intended for Afghan women but ultimately funds extremist networks. The speaker cites a total of $697,000,000 annually, plus shipments of cash funds that allegedly support Madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorazan, and terrorist training camps. They claim that programs under Operation Enduring Sentinel, specifically the Women’s Scholarship Endowment, which receives $60,000,000 annually, and the Young Women Lead program, which gets about $5,000,000 annually, are not benefiting women as described. The speaker notes that, according to the inspector general’s report, the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public, yet asserts that the money is being used to improve Afghan women’s lives. The speaker contends that the money is not for the betterment of women in Afghanistan but is funding terrorism, and that the funds are coming through USAID. The critique extends beyond Afghanistan to Pakistan, stating that USAID spent $8,840,000,000 in the last twenty years on Pakistan’s education-related program. This includes $136,000,000 allocated to build 120 schools, with “zero evidence” that any of them were built, arguing that the inspector general cannot obtain access to verify the projects. The speaker further claims that USAID doubled down by spending $20,000,000 to create educational television programs for children who cannot attend physical school, adding that they “can’t attend it because it doesn’t exist,” asserting that taxpayers paid for it and that “somebody else got the money.” In conclusion, the speaker asserts that taxpayers are funding terrorism and that the program must end, yielding the floor to the chairman.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who gets some of that money? Does that name ring a bell to anybody in the room? Because your money, your money, $697,000,000 annually, plus the shipments of cash funds Madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorazan, terrorist training camps. That's what it's funding. If you think that the that the the program under operation enduring Sentinel entitled Women's Scholarship Endowment which receives $60,000,000 annually or the young women lead which gets about $5,000,000 annually is going to women who, by the way, if you read the inspector general's report, has tell is telling you that the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public. Yet somehow, you're believing and American people are supposed to believe that this money is going for the betterment of the women in Afghanistan. It is not. You are funding terrorism, and it's coming through USAID. And it's not just Afghanistan because Pakistan's right next door. USAID spent $8,840,000,000 in the last year last twenty years on Pakistan's education related program. It includes a $136,000,000 to build a 120 schools of which there is zero evidence than any ever more built. Why would there be any evidence? The inspector general can't get in to see them. But you know what? We doubled down and spent $20,000,000 from USAID to create educational television programs for children unable to attend the physical school. Yeah. They can't attend it because it doesn't exist. You paid for it. Somebody else got the money. You are paying for terrorism. This has got to end. I yield, mister chairman.

@SecScottBessent - Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

Iran is the head of the snake for global terrorism, and through President Trump’s Operation Epic Fury, we are winning this critical fight at an even faster pace than anticipated. In response to Iran’s terrorist attacks against global energy infrastructure, the Trump

Saved - March 30, 2026 at 9:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note congressional inquiries claim the US, with the UK and Israel, has secretly funded Taliban, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, Hezbollah, and other Islamic terrorist groups for decades, implying the US creates its own enemies.

@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo

🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷🇱🇧 Congressional inquiries reveal that the US, in collaboration with the UK and Israel, for decades has been secretly financing: 👉 Taliban, 👉 Al-Qaeda, 👉 ISIS, 👉 Nigerian Boko Haram, 👉 Hezbollah, 👉 other Islamic terrorist organizations So, the US is creating the enemies ITSELF???

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Speaker 0 says, "Are you aware that we are sending $40,000,000 a week to the Taliban?" - Speaker 1 responds, "Yes, sir. Can you name other instances of foreign aid going to terrorist organizations? We have assisted Al Shabaab in Somalia. There's been instances of the Hamzee network in Sudan, Hamas, Islamic Jihad Hezbollah, Kafaiba Hezbollah, Hayat Tahrir al Shams in Syria. Dozens of terror organizations have received indirect assistance from US foreign aid." - Speaker 0 adds, "You know, I'm wondering with all this talk about the Strait Of Hermos and Park Island and everything Lindsey's recommending, why are we listening to a traitor who needs to be arrested to funneling money to have a mosque and Al Qaeda through USAID. He's helping to support the enemies of our nation's food, and it's time to arrest him. He's a traitor."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you aware that we are sending $40,000,000 a week to the Taliban? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Can you name other instances of foreign aid going to terrorist organizations? We have assisted Al Shabaab in Somalia. There's been instances of the Hamzee network in Sudan, Hamas, Islamic Jihad Hezbollah, Kafaiba Hezbollah, Hayat Tahrir al Shams in Syria. Dozens of terror organizations have received indirect assistance from US foreign aid. Speaker 0: You know, I'm wondering with all this talk about the Strait Of Hermos and and, Park Island and everything Lindsey's recommending, why are we listening to a traitor who needs to be arrested to funneling money to have a mosque and Al Qaeda through USAID. He's helping to support the enemies of our nation's food, and it's time to arrest him. He's a traitor.
View Full Interactive Feed