reSee.it - Related Post Feed

FreeBeacon
Posted - June 13, 2022 at 10:14 PM
Saved - February 18, 2024 at 11:18 PM

@FreeBeacon - Washington Free Beacon

FLASHBACK Jean-Pierre said today that the Biden admin “has not weighed in on where people should and should not protest.” On May 10, Psaki said that “the president’s position” is “to encourage [protests] outside of judges’ homes.” https://t.co/cT8vvxP9hG

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president does not have a stance on protesters picketing outside judges' homes. Peaceful protests are encouraged, including those outside of judges' homes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does the president believe, that there should be any type of protesters picketing outside of judges' homes when there's a a case pending before them? Speaker 1: So, you know, we have not weighed in on where people should or should not protest. Protests that have been peaceful to date, and we certainly continue to encourage that outside of judges' homes, and that's the president's position.
RNCResearch
Posted - November 22, 2022 at 5:22 PM
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 12:20 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Chaos ensues as Karine Jean-Pierre REFUSES to call on a reporter asking about the origins of COVID. https://t.co/qYVGz6PIZc

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will not call on you if you yell, and you're taking time off the clock because Dr. Fauci has to leave soon. I'm not engaging in back and forth. It's not your turn. Don't look at me; it is your first question. You can refer to the press briefing. She has a valid question about the origin of COVID. I hear the question, but we're not proceeding as you want. This is disrespectful. I'm done with this. Simon, I'm done. Go ahead.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I will not call on you if you yell, and also you're taking time off the clock because doctor Fauci has to leave in a couple of minutes. I I'm done. I'm not going I'm not getting into a back and forth with you. Go ahead, Jeremy. It is not it is not your turn. Speaker 1: Don't look at me. Speaker 0: It is not your turn. It is not your turn. Speaker 1: It is your first question. You can you can get the press briefing. You need to call from people across the room. She has a valid question. She's actually about the origin of COVID. Speaker 0: I hear the question. Speaker 1: The best person Speaker 0: I I hear your question, but we're not doing this the way you want it. This is the disrespect of me. Is it? It is. I'm done. Simon, I'm done. I'm Simon, I'm done. I'm done with you right now. Go ahead. Go ahead.
ivan_8848
Posted - December 10, 2022 at 12:33 AM
Saved - April 14, 2025 at 10:42 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

KJP Fails the Lie Detector Tests After a 2021 Jen Psaki Video Proves Her Wrong KJP, Dec 2022: "So it's up to private companies to make these types of decisions. We were not involved. I can say that we were not involved." Jen Psaki, July 2021: "We are in regular touch ... ..."⤵️ https://t.co/CXkzCessx4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House Press Secretary was asked about Jim Baker's firing from Twitter and whether the Biden administration was in contact with him regarding moderation decisions or transparency efforts. The response was that these decisions are up to private companies and the administration was not involved. Another question concerned requests for tech companies to be more aggressive in releasing misinformation and whether the administration has been in touch with any of these companies. The response was that the administration is in regular touch with social media platforms through senior staff and the COVID-19 team. Actions the federal government has taken include increased disinformation research and tracking within the surgeon general's office and flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Twitter, Elon Musk, this week fired, the former FBI general counsel Jim Baker, who was serving as a top Twitter lawyer. Musk alleges that he may have been involved with, countermanding his attempts at transparency. And I was wondering if anyone in the Biden administration was in touch with Baker either regarding moderation decisions that critics call political censorship or regarding, his transparency efforts recently. Speaker 1: So it's up to private companies, to make these types of decisions. We were not involved. I can say that. We were not involved. Speaker 2: Thanks, Jen. Can you talk a little bit more about this, request for tech companies to be more aggressive in releasing misinformation? Has the administration been in touch with any of these companies, and are there any actions that the federal government can take to ensure their cooperation? Because we've seen from the start, there's not a lot of action on some of these platforms. Speaker 3: Sure. Well, first, we are in regular touch, with these social media platforms, and those, engagements typically happen through members of our senior staff, but also members of our COVID nineteen team. Given as doctor Murthy conveyed, this is a big issue of misinformation specifically on the pandemic. In terms of actions, Alex, that, we have taken or we're working to take, I should say, from the federal government, we've increased, disinformation research and tracking, within the surgeon general's office. We're flagging problematic posts for Facebook, that spread disinformation.
stillgray
Posted - April 25, 2023 at 3:01 PM
Saved - April 26, 2023 at 1:49 PM

@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong

Dr. Anthony Fauci finally admits that mask mandates were a broad spectrum failure: “From a broad public health standpoint, at the population level, masks work at the margins - maybe 10%.” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/04/24/magazine/dr-fauci-pandemic.html

Dr. Fauci Looks Back: ‘Something Clearly Went Wrong’ In his most extensive interview yet, Anthony Fauci wrestles with the hard lessons of the pandemic — and the decisions that will define his legacy. nytimes.com
EndWokeness
Posted - September 5, 2023 at 7:49 PM
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 1:26 PM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

It’s September 2023 and Biden is wearing a mask again. Mandates are next.

CollinRugg
Posted - September 6, 2023 at 7:13 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 1:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Biden expresses frustration with new mask mandates imposed on him, despite being tested negative. He admits to not wearing a mask upon entering but is required to do so. A call for revolt against these mandates is made.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: Even President Joe Biden seems irritated over the new mask mandates that his handlers are imposing on him. “I've been tested again today. I'm clear across the board, but they keep telling me, because this has to be 10 days or something.” “I gotta keep wearing it, but don't tell 'em I didn't have it on when I walked in.” Revolt, @JoeBiden!

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have tested negative for COVID-19 and have been cleared by the press. However, they still want me to wear a mask for another 10 days. But let's keep it between us that I didn't have it on when I entered.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lord, buddy. We explained to the press. I've been tested again today. I'm clear across the board, But they keep telling me because this has to be 10 days or something. I gotta keep wearing it, but don't tell them I didn't have it on when I walked in.
KevinKileyCA
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 5:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden Administration is rewriting COVID history. OSHA denied firing demands despite a vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans struck down by the Supreme Court. Becerra claimed no force, yet imposed a toddler mask mandate. Cardona denied past support for student vaccine mandates. Rewriting history must be challenged.

@KevinKileyCA - Kevin Kiley

The Biden Administration is rewriting the history of COVID. Today, the head of OSHA claimed "we didn't demand that anyone be fired" despite issuing a worker vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Previously, HHS Secretary Becerra claimed "we didn't force anyone to do anything" despite imposing a toddler mask mandate and Education Secretary Cardona baldly denied his past support for student vaccine mandates.

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden and OSHA did not threaten or demand anyone be fired for not complying with the vaccine mandate. The discussion then shifts to the effectiveness of mask mandates for 2-year-olds and above, with Speaker 2 clarifying that they don't have the authority to force anyone to do anything. Speaker 1 questions if states were encouraged to adopt student vaccine mandates, citing an article where the Education Secretary expressed support for such mandates. The committee members express frustration with officials denying their actions, including the Health and Human Services Secretary's statement on mask mandates for young children. The administration is accused of rewriting history, but Speaker 2 argues that the rule in question is not a vaccine mandate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What was president Biden and OSHA's plan if 84,000,000 Americans refused to comply with the vaccine mandate or show their papers? That's categorically untrue. We didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired. Speaker 1: Did forcing 2 year olds to wear masks save lives? Speaker 2: And who did the forcing? Speaker 1: Well, this your department or the head start, which is under your department, had a mask mandate until late last year for 2 year olds and above even outdoors. So can you point to any public health benefit of that policy? Speaker 2: Right. We never forced anyone to do anything because we don't have the jurisdiction or authority to do that. Speaker 1: Did you encourage states to adopt student vaccine mandates. As you're not encouraged states to adopt, student vaccine mandates where states may sir. You said right here. Not Only do I support it, but I'm encouraging states to come up with a plan to make sure it happens. The title of the article is education secretary backs mandatory school COVID nineteen mandates. Mister Parker, you're one of a number now of officials in this administration who has come before this committee, and tried to tell us the 2 plus 2, doesn't equal 4. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the secretary of education, testified gave false testimony to this committee, denying that he had promoted vaccine mandate when he had done precisely that. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the secretary of health and human services, made one of the most outlandish Statements ever entered into the congressional record, which is saying quite a lot, when he said we never force anyone to do anything in relation to the widely discredited policy Forcing, young children as young as 2 years old, to wear masks. And now you come before us today, asked about one of the most sweeping abuses of power, that we've seen that was rebuked by the Supreme Court, and you tell us that we didn't demand that anyone be fired. So Has there been some sort of memo going around? Why is the administration insistent on rewriting history? Speaker 2: All you have to do is read that rule and you will see that it is not A vaccine mandate.

@KevinKileyCA - Kevin Kiley

Here's the video with the Cardona clip in the middle fixed. If we let them get away with rewriting history, they won't hesitate to do the same thing again. https://t.co/6Ul7hRwkH8

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden and OSHA did not threaten or demand anyone be fired for not complying with the vaccine mandate or showing their papers. The discussion then shifts to the effectiveness of forcing 2-year-olds to wear masks, with Speaker 2 clarifying that they don't have the authority to force anyone to do anything. Speaker 1 questions if states were encouraged to implement student vaccine mandates, referencing an article that supports this claim. The committee members express their frustration with officials denying their actions, including the Secretary of Education and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Finally, Speaker 3 states that the rule in question is not a vaccine mandate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What was president Biden and OSHA's plan if 84,000,000 Americans refused to comply with the vaccine mandate or show their papers? Speaker 1: So that's categorically untrue. Untrue. We didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired. Did forcing 2 year olds to wear masks save lives? Speaker 2: And who did the forcing? Speaker 1: Well, this your department or the head start, which is under your department, had a mask mandate until late last year for 2 year olds and above even outdoors. So can you point to any public health benefit of that policy? Speaker 2: Right. We we never forced anyone to do anything because we don't have the jurisdiction or authority to do that. Speaker 1: Did you encourage states to adopt student vaccine mandates? Thing mandates. As you're not encouraged states to adopt, student vaccine mandates where states may Excuse me, sir. You said right here. Not only do I support But I'm encouraging states to come up with a plan to make sure it happens. The title of the article is education secretary backs mandatory school COVID nineteen mandates. Mister Parker, you're one of a number now of officials in this administration who has come before this committee, and tried to tell us that 2 plus 2, Doesn't equal 4. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the Secretary of Education testified gave false testimony to this committee Denying that he had promoted a student vaccine mandate when he had done precisely that. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the Secretary of Health and Human Services Made one of the most outlandish statements ever entered into the congressional record, which is saying quite a lot when he said, We never force anyone to do anything In relation to the widely discredited policy of forcing, young children as young as 2 years old to wear masks. And now you come before us today asked about one of the most sweeping abuses of power that we've seen that was rebuked by the Supreme Court. And you tell us that we didn't demand that anyone be fired. So has there been some sort of memo going around? Why is the administration insistent on rewriting history? Speaker 3: All you have to do is read that rule and you will see that it is not a vaccine mandate.
DaneUndivided
Posted - September 29, 2023 at 7:20 PM
Saved - September 29, 2023 at 7:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Wisconsin DHS Secretary nominee Kirsten Johnson faced criticism for her handling of the COVID-19 response in Milwaukee. She enforced strict measures like lockdowns, mask mandates, and business closures, causing disagreement with the city council. Some question her sincerity in apologizing for the resulting harms. Concerns were raised about her accountability for the mistakes made during the pandemic.

@DaneUndivided - Dane County Undivided

Wisconsin DHS Secretary Nominee Kirsten Johnson makes a Donald Rumsfeld-esque “mistakes were made” non-apology on Thurs, Sept 28, 2023 at the Wisconsin State Senate confirmation hearing at the Capitol. She was instrumental in making these mistakes 🧵 1/3 https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/wisconsin-health-boss-we-made-mistakes-covid-response

Wisconsin health chief: We made mistakes with COVID response State official says she wouldn’t mandate masks. justthenews.com

@DaneUndivided - Dane County Undivided

While in Milwaukee, Johnson was responsible for & drove the city's COVID response. That included lockdown orders, mask mandates, decisions to close businesses & forced social distancing. She left Milwaukee's health department, after apparent disagreement with the city council 2/3

@DaneUndivided - Dane County Undivided

Is Kirsten Johnson just saying what she has to say in order to get confirmed as DHS secretary? She mandated masks, lockdowns, #COVID19 shots for whomever she could. She didn’t apologize for the harms caused by these measures such as mandatory masks & #CovidVaccines 3/3 🧵

@DaneUndivided - Dane County Undivided

@reSeeIt save thread Reasonable questions about @DHSWI secretary nominee about #COVID19 mistakes she made & is responsible for implementing #Nuremberg2

WallStreetApes
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 4:54 PM
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 2:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The government denies forcing vaccines or threatening jobs amid COVID-19. They claim no student vaccine mandates existed. However, questions arise regarding the efficacy of mask mandates for two-year-olds. Officials deny promoting vaccine mandates, but evidence suggests otherwise. The administration faces criticism for alleged abuses of power. A rule is cited to argue against the existence of a vaccine mandate.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW Now The Government Is Backpedaling. They Say No One Forced Vaccines, No One Threatened Jobs, No One Mandated Anything For COVID 19, There Were No Student Vaccine Mandates, What The Heck Is This?!?! “What was President Biden and OSHA's plan if 84 million Americans refuse to comply with the vaccine mandate or show their papers? That's categorically untrue. We didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired. Did forcing two-year-olds to wear masks save lives? And who did the forcing? Well, your department or the Head Start, which is under your department, had a mask mandate until late last year for two-year-olds and above even outdoors. So can you point to any public health benefit of that policy? Right, we never forced anyone to do anything because we don't have the jurisdiction or authority to do that. Did you encourage states to adopt student vaccine mandates? I did not encourage states to adopt student vaccine mandates. Where states... Excuse me, sir, you said right here, not only do I support it, but I'm encouraging states to come up with a plan to make sure it happens. The title of the article is Education Secretary Backs Mandatory School COVID-19 Mandates. Mr. Parker, you're one of a number now of officials in this administration who has come before this committee and tried to tell us that 2 plus 2 doesn't equal 4. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the Secretary of Education testified, gave false testimony to this committee denying that he had promoted a student vaccine mandate when he had done precisely that. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the Secretary of Health and Human Services made one of the most outlandish statements ever entered into the Congressional record, which is saying quite a lot. When he said we never forced anyone to do anything in relation to the widely discredited policy of forcing uh... young children as young as two years old uh... to wear masks and now you come before us today uh... asked about one of the most sweeping uh... abuses of power uh... that we've seen that was rebuked by the supreme court and you tell us that we didn't demand that anyone be fired so what has there's been some sort of memo going around why is the administration All you have to do is read that rule and you will see that it is not a vaccine mandate.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions President Biden and OSHA's plan regarding non-compliance with the vaccine mandate. Speaker 0 denies any threats or demands for firing. Speaker 1 denies forcing anyone to do anything, claiming lack of jurisdiction. Speaker 0 questions the effectiveness of mask mandates for 2-year-olds. Speaker 1 denies encouraging student vaccine mandates, despite evidence suggesting otherwise. The speaker criticizes officials for distorting facts and rewriting history. The administration is accused of abusing power and the Supreme Court's rebuke is mentioned. The speaker concludes by stating that the vaccine mandate is not actually a mandate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What was president Biden and OSHA's plan if 84,000,000 Americans refused to comply with the vaccine mandate or show their papers? That's categorically untrue. We didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired. Did forcing 2 year olds to wear masks save lives? Speaker 1: And who did the forcing? Speaker 0: Well, this your department or the head start, which is under your department, had a mask mandate until late last year for 2 year olds and above even outdoors. So can you point to any public health benefit of that policy? Speaker 1: Right. We we never forced anyone to do anything, because we don't have the jurisdiction or authority to do that. Speaker 0: Did you encourage states to adopt student vaccine mandates. As you're not encouraged states to adopt, student vaccine mandates, where states Excuse me, sir. You said here. Not only do I support it, but I'm encouraging states to come up with a plan to make sure it happens. The title of the article is education secretary backs mandatory school COVID nineteen mandates. Mister Parker, you're one of a number now of officials in this administration who has come before this committee, and tried to tell us that 2 plus 2, doesn't equal 4. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the secretary of education, testified gave false testimony to this committee, Denying that he had promoted a student vaccine mandate when he had done precisely that. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the secretary of health and human services, Made one of the most outlandish statements ever entered into the congressional record, which is saying quite a lot, when he said we never force anyone to do anything in relation to the widely discredited policy of forcing, young children as young as 2 years old, to wear masks. So now you come before us today, asked about one of the most sweeping abuses of power that we've seen that was rebuked by the Supreme Court. And you tell us that we didn't demand that anyone be fired. So has there been some sort of memo going around? Why is the administration insistent on rewriting history? All you have to do is read that rule and you will see that it is not a vaccine mandate.
RNCResearch
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 2:35 PM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 2:55 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

In October 2021, Karine Jean-Pierre said a border wall "doesn't work" and "is not an effective policy." Yesterday, the Biden admin declared an "immediate need" for a border wall in south Texas.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The President's nominee for lead customer support and protection expressed support for continuing the use of Title 42 and completing certain sections of the border wall during a confirmation hearing. The President's stance on these comments is unclear as they have not been reviewed yet. However, the administration generally believes that the border wall is an ineffective policy, as experts have stated. Without having read the comments in context, it is difficult to provide further comment on them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The President's nominee for lead customer support and protection said it said a confirmation hearing yesterday that he supported the continued use of Title 42. He also indicated that certain sections of the border wall should be finished. Does the President agree? Speaker 1: Well, as you know, we have said That I have to look at the comments. I have not seen them, so I want to make sure I read it within context. But we have talked about the border wall here in general as a way that it's been used the to close the border. And we feel that it is a policy that doesn't work. And it's not just us. Experts have said that. The border wall is not an effective policy. As far as those comments, I can't comment on that. I actually I have not seen it. I have not read them. And I need to read it in context.
realstewpeters
Posted - October 19, 2023 at 2:22 AM
Saved - June 2, 2024 at 2:02 AM

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Joe Biden’s mask is malfunctioning again. https://t.co/pem6LV9SMf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Every mass shooting leaves people in shock, unable to comprehend the tragedy. I often face criticism for spending hours answering questions, but it's important. Some seek solace in prayer during such senseless acts of violence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virtually every mass shooting, every circumstance where large number of people have been victimized. When someone's going through something, they're on their comprehension. They've never thought that that could And now I always get criticized sometimes unless I have people when I go, there's a man's eye state for 3 to 4 hours to answer all the questions. But it matters. It matters a lot. And, and look, I'm talking about some of you people are looking for just something to pray, something because there's some sense
SebGorka
Posted - October 26, 2023 at 3:15 PM
Saved - October 26, 2023 at 7:03 PM

@SebGorka - Sebastian Gorka DrG

Proof that Karine Jean Pierre is the dumbest person in the Biden Administration. https://t.co/5Qg5POfItl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the current energy policies of the president have led to an increase in oil prices, which in turn may be providing Iran with more funds to support terrorist groups. Speaker 1 disagrees with this viewpoint, stating that they do not believe our actions are directly funding Iran. Speaker 0 argues that by restricting oil supply in the US and regulating the industry, the administration is indirectly contributing to higher oil prices and potentially benefiting Iran. Speaker 1 avoids commenting on this hypothetical scenario and does not provide a clear answer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the president's current energy policies giving Iran enough money to fund terror groups because the price well, the price of oil has gone up under this president. The former president Trump, the average price of brand oil was $58. Under this president, it's $83 a barrel, so the price of oil is more. Is that giving Iran enough money to fund these tariffs in the Middle East? Speaker 1: I mean, I wholeheartedly disagree that We're our actions are giving is that what you're saying? Can you say that again? Speaker 0: The current energy policies in the From our energy policies. It's seen the price of oil go up because when you restrict supply here in the United States, it's forcing to get the global supply somewhere else, OPEC is cutting prices of oil, so the price of oil goes up. Speaker 1: Yes, and we're not part of OPEC. Right. So they're going to make their decisions On whatever they decide, we are not a member of OPEC. Speaker 0: The administration has decided to regulate the oil industry here in the U. S. And restrict investment, on future investment in the oil supply in the U. S. And so as the price of oil goes up, is that giving Iran enough money to fund these tariffs? Speaker 1: There seems to be a big jump, and so, certainly I'm not going to speak into that type of hypothetical. It sounds like a hypothetical that you're asking me. So certainly I'm not going to wait in weigh into
RNCResearch
Posted - October 26, 2023 at 6:40 PM
Saved - October 26, 2023 at 10:46 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

"Gavin Newsom is currently in China and met with President Xi ... has the White House sanctioned this trip?" KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: "I just don't have anything to speak to on that trip" https://t.co/GHojuGIMo5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Governor Gavin Newsom met with President Xi in China, but it is unclear if the White House coordinated or sanctioned this trip. The speaker does not have any information on the visit and suggests contacting the state department or the governor's office for more details.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Governor Gavin Newsom is currently in China and met with president Xi yesterday. Has the White House coordinated with him at all on this visit and did the White House sanction this trip? Speaker 1: I just don't have anything to to speak to, on that trip. I would refer you to, I would refer you to the state department and also to the the governor's office. I just don't have anything to share On that particular trip. Thank you. See you guys
DschlopesIsBack
Posted - November 2, 2023 at 3:51 AM
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 1:07 AM

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Dr. Fauci - "Masks are not theater" https://t.co/UTOwKTDA75

RNCResearch
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 8:05 PM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 8:33 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

WATCH: A CBS reporter takes Karine Jean-Pierre to task over Biden's complete unwillingness to address BORDER SECURITY over the three years he has been in office https://t.co/Vo01x1cMkh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes that a comprehensive immigration reform plan was put forth on day 1 of the presidency, which has been a priority for almost 3 years. They mention regular conversations with congressional leaders on various issues, including immigration. The speaker disagrees with the notion that little public time has been spent on immigration, highlighting policy actions taken to address the border situation. They argue that being consistent and addressing a long-standing issue is demonstrated by the first piece of legislation being on immigration. This shows a serious commitment to fixing a broken system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They put forth and you laid that out in your question, a comprehensive immigration reform plan. He did that on day 1. And it is going on 3 years, on 3 years Speaker 1: he spent pushing that bill Speaker 0: On 3 years. Speaker 1: Here's the thing. Met with them on foreign policy, On a fiscal cliff, Speaker 0: on a budget, and it's Speaker 1: never been about immigration. Speaker 0: And we have regular conversations with congressional leaders and congressional staff about an array of issues, including this. I mean, this is you cannot send a bigger message to Congress and the American people when you say your 1st, when you put out your 1st piece of legislation is on this issue, is on reforming immigration. Right? It's on fixing flat Speaker 1: when you spend very little public time as president Talking about the issue, meeting with congressional leaders on the issue specifically, or doing anything else other than having you come out here To say, we issued a bill Speaker 0: on day 1. I disagree. It's not just issue a bill. Like, not too long ago back in the spring, we put forth policies on trying to make sure that because because congress didn't help on trying to put forth policies that try to make the immigration system humane, right, humane actually dealing with the issue that we're seeing at the border. We have taken policy actions after policy actions without without the help from congress. Without. Right? And so that is that is being consistent here. And when you put forth the 1st piece of legislation to be on this issue that has been broken for decades. I mean, that's what he did as president. That's taking it very, very seriously.
FoxNews
Posted - January 10, 2024 at 11:31 AM
Saved - January 10, 2024 at 1:38 PM

@FoxNews - Fox News

Karine Jean-Pierre hasn't answered 98% of Biden corruption, scandal allegations: study https://trib.al/pzWcwiN

SocialFlow trib.al
TaraBull808
Posted - January 11, 2024 at 6:10 PM
Saved - January 11, 2024 at 8:38 PM

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

Karine Jean-Pierre claims we have seen a decrease in illegal immigration Do these people ever tell the truth? https://t.co/cATboGgFii

Video Transcript AI Summary
The migration of migrants has decreased due to the actions taken by the president of Mexico. These diplomatic conversations have proven to be effective.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So we have seen results in, in the migration of migrants, right? We've seen a decrease because of the actions that president president of Mexico has taken. And so again because of this these diplomatic conversations, they have been effective. We see them as being effective.
FFT1776
Posted - January 27, 2024 at 1:14 PM
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 5:39 PM

@FFT1776 - FFT1776™

Arkansas Stands with Texas! “Until we get one back in the White House, states will do what President Biden refuses to do.” ~ Sarah Huckabee Sanders https://t.co/EMWn5YzBFf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under President Trump, our border was more secure than under President Biden. I visited the border and spoke with Arkansas National Guard members who are there because the federal government is not doing their job. They informed us that in just one month, more people on the terrorist watch list crossed the border than during Trump's entire presidency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our border was far more secure under President Trump than under President Biden. I had the chance to go to the border myself. And while I was there, met with those who are standing on the front lines, including members of the Arkansas National Guard that we deployed because the federal government is not doing their job. States are having to step up. They told us that more people had come across in just that month, just that month on the terrorist watch list than in the entire 4 years of Donald Trump's presidency.
RNCResearch
Posted - July 3, 2024 at 6:24 PM
Saved - July 4, 2024 at 1:53 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

REPORTER: If "jet lag" was really a reason for Biden's disastrous debate performance, why didn't you just say that yesterday? KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: "That was my bad." https://t.co/xTEVXRrCSA

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was asked about the president's debate performance and his travel schedule. I didn't mention it initially, but I knew about it. The jet lag and foreign trip did play a part in his performance, along with a cold. I focused on the cold during my previous comments, but I acknowledge that his schedule was a factor as well.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I did wanna follow-up on, what brought up, I think others as well. You did get numerous questions yesterday Yep. About the president's debate performance. You didn't mention the travel Yeah. The jet lag, the foreign trip. So I think you can understand, why was a little bit puzzling to hear the president mentioning that as his explanation Yep. For the first time last night. I'm just Yeah. Can you clarify whether when you took podium yesterday, did you not know that And I and I would say that is my bad. That is part of, that is part of, definitely part of the explanation of what had occurred. I I did know that. I did know that. I did. I did know that. But we were so focused. I was so focused on the call on the cold, and that's what I kind of leaned into and talked about. But, yes, his schedule did have something to do with it. It was the schedule and the cold, and I did I was aware of that yesterday.
RNCResearch
Posted - July 3, 2024 at 6:52 PM
Saved - July 4, 2024 at 1:47 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Karine Jean-Pierre DEFENDS Biden's outrageous, false debate claim that no U.S. troops have been killed abroad on his watch: "The president was making a comparison." SHAME ON HER! https://t.co/MbNpL4wWa7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thirteen US service members died at AbiGate during the Afghanistan withdrawal, and three died in a drone attack in Jordan this year. The President mistakenly claimed to be the only president without troops dying, but he deeply cares about service members and their families. He attended the dignified transfers of fallen soldiers and will continue to honor them. The President was comparing the number of service members who died under his leadership to previous years to emphasize his commitment to keeping troops safe.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, with 13 US service members died at AbiGate during the Afghanistan withdrawal. And then this year, 3 US service members died in a drone attack in Jordan. And yet the president said, quote, he's the only president this century, this decade, that doesn't have any troops dying anywhere in the world like he did, end quote. I get having a bad night, but how does the president get that so wrong? Speaker 1: So I appreciate the question. I really do. And I was asked about this, I believe, in the gaggle on Friday, I believe. And I said this, and I'll just reiterate this, now. And, again, I appreciate the opportunity. Look. Look, the President cares deeply about our service members. He does and their families. There are men's sacrifices that they've made to take on the and and he takes on his responsibility as a commander in chief. And that is something that certainly he will continue to do. I mentioned moments ago that tomorrow on July 4th, he's going to have active military members here and their families, to thank them personally. And obviously, they make their families make sacrifices as well. And as you know, he attended the dignified transfer of the 13 as you just mentioned, brave service members who lost their lives in Afghanistan on August 26 in 2021, and as well as the 3 who lost their lives in Jordan earlier this year. I was there, with the president, and you can see how much it how important he understood it was for him to be there for that moment to be there for the families. And so just want to be really clear about that because he has so much gratitude. And we know that as a country, we can never repay them for their courage. But to your question, the President was making a comparison between how many service members have died under his leadership versus in previous years. That's what the comparison that he was making, and he is doing, doing he was doing that because he cares so deeply cares so deeply about them and their families and wants to keep troops safe.
_emergent_
Posted - July 24, 2024 at 4:13 PM
Saved - August 20, 2024 at 3:09 AM

@_emergent_ - Emergent Perspective

#KamalaHarris's Campaign and MSM: "Kamala was never Border Czar." Biden: "I have asked [Border Czar Kamala] to lead the efforts to...stem the migration over our southern border." Unsuccessfully rewriting history. https://t.co/Zro0S7P9Lo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The VP is tasked with leading efforts related to Mexico and the Northern Triangle countries. The goal is to stem the movement and migration of people to the southern border.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've asked her, the VP today because she's the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with, Mexico and the Northern Triangle and the countries, that, help us. We're gonna need help in stemming the movement of, so many folks, stemming the migration to our southern border.
Jules31415
Posted - October 31, 2024 at 3:36 AM
Saved - November 1, 2024 at 11:11 AM

@Jules31415 - Julia 🇺🇸

Karine Jean-Pierre refuses to say whether Biden's "garbage" comment was read from prepared remarks https://t.co/IMIEbXSilo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president was indeed using notes during his remarks last night, which is common for elected officials. However, the key point is that he aimed to clarify his statements. This demonstrates the president's integrity in addressing the hateful rhetoric from a comedian's remarks made on Sunday. Specific details won't be discussed, but it's important to recognize the president's intent to ensure clarity in his communication.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm just following up on 2 questions from my colleagues. For the sake of clarity, was the president reading from prepared remarks last night? Look, the president had certainly, it's not unusual for for a president, vice president, or any elected officials to have notes on what they are what they want to say, prepared to say. I'm not gonna I'm just not gonna get into specifics here. What is I think what's important to note here is the president wanted to clarify what he said. That is what is important. And for a president to do that, I think is important. And I think that shows, the integrity of this president to want to make sure that, hey, I wanna make really clear I was talking about the comedian and the hateful rhetoric that was coming out of his remarks on on Sunday. I'm not gonna get into, I'm not gonna get into specifics here, and and just leave it as that.
drdrew
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 1:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This weekend, YouTube accused me of spreading medical misinformation and removed two videos featuring licensed physicians. I’ve been a board-certified doctor for over 40 years and believe in free speech and open debate among experts, even when I don’t fully agree with their opinions. I highlighted statements from Dr. Fauci and Rachel Maddow that remain on YouTube, questioning the consistency of their moderation. To remove the warnings, I must undergo YouTube's reeducation training, but I refuse to compromise my content. I'm grateful for platforms that support free speech.

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

This weekend, @YouTubeCreators accused me of spreading "medical misinformation" & took down 2 videos with an MD & a lawyer. I've been a board-certified physician for over 40 years – 2x @YouTube's existence. So let's take a closer look at the timestamps they say are "harmful"...

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

Violation 1: medical misinformation at 22:52. Dr. Kelly Victory shares her professional opinion about young people who were injured by mRNA side effects, saying the "vast majority of the people who have been injured are young, healthy people who were under the age of 50 who had fundamentally zero risk from COVID itself. They all got COVID. 98% of the population has documentation they've had COVID. These are people who would have been fine if they were just left alone." The two people on screen – @DrKellyVictory and me – are licensed, board-certified physicians who completed medical school decades ago. I was chief resident at Huntington Hospital, an Assistant Clinical Professor in medicine & psychiatry at Keck USC, and a Director of Addiction Services at Las Encinas Hospital for 25 years. Do I agree with everything Dr. Victory says? I do not. And she wouldn't hesitate to say the same about me (often on my own show). But I have a commitment to free speech and open debate between dissenting experts. It is not medical misinformation for a licensed doctor to provide an opinion on a broadcast.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The tragedy is that many young, healthy individuals under 50, who had minimal risk from COVID, were injured. A significant percentage of the population has documented cases of COVID. These individuals would have been fine if left alone. Instead, many were harmed, often against their better judgment, as they felt pressured to comply with mandates to keep their jobs or attend school.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the the real tragedy with this, Drew, is that the vast majority of the people who've been injured are young, healthy people, people who were under the age of 50 who had fundamentally zero risk from COVID itself. They all got COVID. 96%, 98% of the population has documented and well known that they had COVID. Okay? These are people who would have done fine if they'd just been left alone. But instead Yes. They were maimed, many of them against their better judgment, against their best, you know, interest. They could you know, they had to do it to keep their jobs, to go to school, to whatever it is. Yeah. And so we they were harmed.

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

By the way... here's Dr. Fauci in 2023 insisting "there's no doubt that masks work" despite the data and opposition from public health experts like epidemiologist @DrHarveyRisch (a Yale professor) who told me "in reality, what you’re talking about is putting up a chain link fence and hoping that it blocks mosquitoes.” Dr. Fauci's interview is still fully available on YouTube: https://youtu.be/e3AMslS6cKw?t=228

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

Violation 2: medical misinformation at 38:21. Attorney Warner Mendenhall of @akronlawfirm shares his professional opinion and details about a case he's fighting. "I believe about half a million people have died from taking the shot. We are currently representing one of my clients who is extremely ill. Her spinal cord has been damaged... she's having trouble breathing... she goes by @thecoercednurse." Do I agree with everything Mendenhall says? I do not. I haven't seen convincing evidence that 500,000 people died from the shot. But it is not medical misinformation for an attorney to discuss the details of an ongoing case, even if those details do not align with the CDC's preferred narrative at the time (e.g. the Tuskegee Study, Guatemalan STD experiments, Willowbrook Hepatitis study, Camp Lejeune water contamination). It is not medical misinformation for someone to state their belief that a large number of people were harmed by a medical product or study. That is his opinion based on evidence from his cases.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe around 500,000 people have died from the vaccine. We are currently representing clients affected by this. One client, Dani Baker, is severely ill; her spinal cord is damaged, her diaphragm isn't functioning properly, and she's struggling to breathe at just 40 years old. She took the vaccine due to her job. Dani, known as "course nurse" on Twitter, is a strong advocate, and we aim to highlight her case.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I believe about half a 1000000 people have died from taking the shot. We are currently representing people, you know, one of my clients unfortunately is extremely ill. You know her spinal cord has been damaged, her diaphragm no longer works properly, she's having trouble breathing and she's 40 years old and she took it because of her job. That's a lady named Dani Baker, by the way. She goes by course nurse on Twitter, and she's a fantastic client to have and we're gonna try to make a point with that.

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

By the way... here's Rachel Maddow telling MSNBC viewers "we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to get more people." Maddow's statements are still fully available on @YouTube: https://youtu.be/teb8Trr7JWs

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

How do I get these warnings removed? It's simple: I must attend YouTube's reeducation training and be a good boy for 90 days, or else they will delete my channel and its 1000+ videos. https://t.co/MNfw4ZXfXG

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

These aren't the first warnings or strikes I've received from @YouTube. The first time this happened, my producer got on the phone with them & made peace (it's hard to moderate billions of hours of content and YouTube will make mistakes sometimes). But when it happened again last year, my producer politely asked them if I could do a "provider to provider" call, from one physician to another, so I could have a clinical conversation with the person on their side who is judging my interviews – the hallowed YouTube moderator who graduated medical school, spent time in residency, and treated enough patients to confidently claim my professional opinion is harmful enough to justify censorship. Of course that person couldn't speak to me, because that person does not exist. YouTube doesn't have physicians on their moderation team.

@drdrew - Dr. Drew

YouTube is free to stay on the wrong side of history. Their house, their rules. But it's times like these when I'm especially grateful that @ElonMusk brought free speech back to the public square. Both @AskDrDrew episodes are still available on X, and I refuse to delete even 1 second of them to appease Google's unqualified, unlicensed, untrained, unidentified censors. • 1/10/2025 with @DrKellyVictory & @HarryFisherEMTP: https://t.co/uvYIMkYSRp • 1/8/2025 with Warner Mendenhall & @DrRandallBock: https://t.co/EbXnnA9gid

toobaffled
Posted - May 1, 2025 at 8:58 AM
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 9:56 AM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Do you believe this? 👇 WHO chief Dr. Tedros: "WHO did not impose anything on anyone during the COVID-19 pandemic. Not lockdowns, not mask mandates, not vaccine mandates. We don't have the power to do that. We don't want it, and we are not trying to get it." https://t.co/0ZRBdfZCPH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO states it did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting it lacks such power and does not seek it. The WHO says its role is to support governments with evidence-based guidance, advice, and supplies to help them protect their people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: WHO did not impose anything on anyone during the COVID nineteen pandemic. Not lockdowns, not mask mandates, not vaccine mandates. We don't have the power to do that. We don't want it, and we're not trying to get it. Our job is to support governments with evidence based guidance, advice, and when needed supplies to help them protect their people.
ThePatriotOasis
Posted - November 27, 2025 at 2:55 AM
Saved - November 27, 2025 at 3:39 AM

@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™

🚨BREAKING - Video as resurfaced and is going viral of Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki saying: “No one is coming into the United States of America who has not been through a THOROUGH screening.” Can we get an update, @jrpsaki? https://t.co/1kmtUEs0QU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises a concern about a security risk and asks what reassurances can be given about screening and efforts to prevent such individuals from entering. The speaker then asserts that no one is coming into the United States who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process. They note that there are many individuals who have not been through that process and have gone to lily pad countries as that process has been completed. The statement adds that this does not mean there is a flag attached to those cases; it means they have not completed their...
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Security risk of some kind. What reassurances can you make about the screening process and the attempts to make sure that somebody like that doesn't make his or her way here? I can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into The United States Of America who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process. And, there are many individuals, as you noted, who have not been through that process, and they have gone to lily pad countries as that process has been completed. It doesn't mean that that's because there's a flag. It means they have not completed their
KevinKileyCA
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 7:58 PM
Saved - September 28, 2023 at 11:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden Administration is rewriting COVID history. OSHA denies firing demands despite a vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans struck down by the Supreme Court. HHS Secretary Becerra claims no force, yet imposes toddler mask mandate. Education Secretary Cardona denies past support for student vaccine mandates.

@KevinKileyCA - Kevin Kiley

The Biden Administration is rewriting the history of COVID. Today, the head of OSHA claimed "we didn't demand that anyone be fired" despite issuing a worker vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans that was struck down by the Supreme Court. Previously, HHS Secretary Becerra claimed "we didn't force anyone to do anything" despite imposing a toddler mask mandate and Education Secretary Cardona baldly denied his past support for student vaccine mandates.

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden and OSHA did not threaten or demand anyone be fired for not complying with the vaccine mandate or showing their papers. The discussion then shifts to the effectiveness of forcing 2-year-olds to wear masks, with Speaker 2 clarifying that they don't have the authority to force anyone to do anything. Speaker 1 questions if states were encouraged to adopt student vaccine mandates, citing an article where the Education Secretary expressed support for such mandates. The committee members express frustration with officials denying their actions, including promoting vaccine mandates and forcing young children to wear masks. The administration is accused of rewriting history, but Speaker 2 argues that the rule in question is not a vaccine mandate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What was president Biden and OSHA's plan if 84,000,000 Americans refused to comply with the vaccine mandate or show their papers? That's categorically untrue. We didn't threaten anyone and we didn't demand that anyone be fired. Speaker 1: Did forcing 2 year olds to wear masks save lives? Speaker 2: And who did the forcing? Speaker 1: Well, this your department or the head start, which is under your department, had a mask mandate until late last year for 2 year olds and above even outdoors. So can you point to any public health benefit of that policy? Speaker 2: Right. We never forced anyone to do anything because we don't have the jurisdiction or authority to do that. Speaker 1: Did you encourage states to adopt student vaccine mandates. As you're not encouraged states to adopt, student vaccine mandates where states may sir. You said right here. Not Only do I support it, but I'm encouraging states to come up with a plan to make sure it happens. The title of the article is education secretary backs mandatory school COVID nineteen mandates. Mister Parker, you're one of a number now of officials in this administration who has come before this committee, and tried to tell us the 2 plus 2, doesn't equal 4. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the secretary of education, testified gave false testimony to this committee, denying that he had promoted vaccine mandate when he had done precisely that. Sitting in the chair that you're in now, the secretary of health and human services, made one of the most outlandish Statements ever entered into the congressional record, which is saying quite a lot, when he said we never force anyone to do anything in relation to the widely discredited policy Forcing, young children as young as 2 years old, to wear masks. And now you come before us today, asked about one of the most sweeping abuses of power, that we've seen that was rebuked by the Supreme Court, and you tell us that we didn't demand that anyone be fired. So Has there been some sort of memo going around? Why is the administration insistent on rewriting history? Speaker 2: All you have to do is read that rule and you will see that it is not A vaccine mandate.
View Full Interactive Feed