reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a shocking observation about CNN’s Jade Sacker entering the Capitol alongside a BLM/Antifa member, who exclaimed, “We did it!” It seems CNN was embedded with these groups, pretending to be Trump supporters while filming the riot. This raises serious concerns about their press access in DC and suggests a need for systemic changes. Additionally, I noted that while she was reportedly working on a CNN project, she has also contributed to NBC and NPR. It's frustrating that as a reporter, she operates without the same restrictions imposed on the rest of us.
@amuse - @amuse
BREAKING: CNN’s Jade Sacker penetrating the Capitol with a member of BLM/Antifa cheering, “We did it!” And then asking her conspirator if he was filming, he said he’d delete it, he lied. CNN was in on it. https://t.co/FVhotiAwcP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 acknowledges Speaker 1 was right about something they accomplished. Speaker 1 states they couldn't say much previously and asks Speaker 0 to wash their chin. Speaker 1 then asks if the accomplishment will result in the best film ever made, answering "Hell yeah" to their own question. Speaker 2 echoes "Hell yeah." Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 2 is recording. Speaker 1 says they will delete it, clarifying they didn't record Speaker 0 or themself. Speaker 2 compliments someone's appearance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We did it. You were right. We did it.
Speaker 1: Dude, I was trying to tell you. I I couldn't say much.
Speaker 0: You were right. You were right.
Speaker 1: You just have to wash my chin. Oh my god. Is this not gonna be the best film you've ever made in your life? No. No.
Hell yeah.
Speaker 0: Hell yeah?
Speaker 2: Hell yeah. Wait.
Speaker 0: You're not recording, are you?
Speaker 1: I'll delete that shit. But I didn't record you or me.
Speaker 2: You're just gorgeous.
@amuse - @amuse
2/ To make this clear. CNN was embedded with BLM/Antifa pretending to be Trump supporters videoing them incite a riot. This is freaking huge. If CNN is allowed to maintain its press access anywhere in DC there needs to be a serious overhaul of our entire system.
@amuse - @amuse
3/ According to sources she was working on a CNN project, but she's done a lot of work for NBC and NPR.
@amuse - @amuse
4/ Sadly, as a 'reporter' she is exempt from every regulation and lockdown in the nation. She's allowed to keep working while you and your children are stuck at home.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a video showing Jade Sacker at the Capitol, seemingly celebrating with a member of BLM/Antifa. It raised questions about her connection to CNN. Some believe this indicates a conspiracy involving CNN and the Capitol siege, suggesting that Democrats staged the event for political gain. There's a feeling that CNN only reports positively about patriots when they need to cover something up, hinting that proof of this alleged staging might soon emerge.
@numberonepal - Numberonepal🐝
Is that Jade Sacker storming the Capitol saying "we did it". Doesn't she work for @CNN?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 acknowledges Speaker 1 was right about something. Speaker 1 states they were trying to communicate this, but couldn't say much. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 to wash their chair and suggests the film they are making will be the best ever. Speaker 0 agrees enthusiastically. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 was recording, and Speaker 1 offers to delete it. Speaker 2 clarifies that they only recorded verses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We did it. You were right. You did it.
Speaker 1: Dude, I was trying to tell you. I I couldn't say much.
Speaker 0: You were right.
Speaker 1: You just have to wash my chair. Oh my god. Is this not gonna be the best film you've ever made in your life? Hell
Speaker 0: yeah. Hell yeah? Hell yeah. But you weren't recording, are you?
Speaker 1: I'll delete that shit.
Speaker 2: But I didn't record you. It's just verses.
@numberonepal - Numberonepal🐝
I think this is where the above vidya originated: https://mobile.twitter.com/amuse/status/1349885882262761473
@amuse (@amuse) on X
BREAKING: CNN’s Jade Sacker penetrating the Capitol with a member of BLM/Antifa cheering, “We did it!” And then asking her conspirator if he was filming, he said he’d delete it, he lied. CNN was in on it.
mobile.twitter.com
@numberonepal - Numberonepal🐝
From @StormIsUponUs (Gab) CNN doesn't print anything favorable to patriots unless they're trying to get ahead of something. This suggests to me we are about to see definitive proof that Democrats staged the siege on the Capitol to initiate an impeachment... https://t.co/TVpX7tQmUX
@greg_price11 - Greg Price
🚨BREAKING: Never before seen video of January 6 shows Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, being led through the Capitol by police the entire time that he was in the building. https://t.co/rikoRMWezF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jacob Chansley, often depicted as a dangerous conspiracy theorist, was sentenced to nearly four years in prison for his role in the January 6th Capitol insurrection. The circumstances of his entry into the Capitol remain disputed, but surveillance footage reveals that Capitol Police did not stop him. Instead, they appeared to assist him, guiding him through the building and even attempting to open locked doors. At least nine officers were in close proximity to Chansley, yet none intervened. Chansley seemed to perceive the Capitol Police as allies, as evidenced by a prayer he offered on the Senate floor thanking them. This contrasts sharply with the narrative surrounding his actions during the insurrection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dangerous conspiracy theorist dressed in outlandish costume who led the violent insurrection to overthrow American democracy. For these crimes, Chansley was sentenced to nearly 4 years in prison far more time than many violent criminals now receive. What did Jacob Chansley do to receive this punishment? To this day, there is dispute over how chance we got into the Capitol building, but according to our review of the internal surveillance video, it is very clear what happened once he got inside. Virtually every moment of his time inside the Capitol was caught on tape the tape show the Capitol Police never stopped Jacob Chansley they helped him they acted as his tour guides here's video of Chansley in the senate chamber Capitol police officers take him to multiple entrances and even try to open locked doors for him we counted at least 9 officers who are within touching distance of unarmed Jacob Chansley Not one of them even tried to slow him down.
Chansley understood that Capitol Police were his allies. Video shows him giving thanks for them in a prayer on the floor of the senate. Watch. Contrast the reality of what Jacob Chansley did in the capitol building on January 6th. The
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: Previously censored video re-emerges of Trump supporters removing masked man with earpiece, dressed in ANTIFA BLACK who was caught tearing out Capitol window. WON’T SEE THIS ON CNN.. https://t.co/Nlf74fDi4J
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unraveling the Events of January 6th: A Closer Look
Summary: The events of January 6th, commonly referred to as the Capitol insurrection, have been the subject of intense debate and speculation. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the various perspectives and claims surrounding the incident. From allegations of orchestrated violence by Pelosi and Antifa to the role of Trump supporters in protecting the Capitol, we delve into the details to shed light on this controversial event.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
BREAKING: Trumpers commit violent insurrection on J6. Not lol. @dom_lucre @KanekoaTheGreat J6ers fight Pelosi's Stasi (some bad Feds, CP, Antifa) to STOP vandalism of Capitol and to STOP Capitol Police from beating unarmed Protestors. #J6Files #J6Substack #J6 #Insurrection
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Pelosi/Feds/Antifa: 1. Brag they orchestrated Capitol Breech. Vids prove they did it. 2. Attack and murder Protestors. 3. Refuse National Guard backup. Trumpers: 1. Protect Capitol. 2. Protect protestors from renegade Capitol Police. 3. Protect Capitol Police from renegade Feds.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
1. Bad guys bragged in ecstasy about pulling off Capitol breach: A. Trump offered National Guard but Nancy-Mitch (with final say so on all Capitol security) refused. B. Fed Epps: 'I orchestrated it.' C. Antifa Johnny: 'We did it.'
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
PELOSI-MITCH'S INSURRECTION They refused National Guard backup at Capitol 'as it would have been bad optics', but the real reason was they were plotting a violent insurrection (framing Trumpers) to interrupt 14 hours of Senate Objections to certification of the 2020 Election.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
BLM Protestors in 2020 often blamed Feds (i.e., anarchists posing as RWWS) for infiltrating their Riots to incite violence. Hells Angel 'Umbrella Man' at the Autozone BLM Riot, who increased violence acuity at Riot, is case in point.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Despite BLM being hijacked by Fed infiltrators, BLM has been unwilling to admit that J6 was hijacked by Fed infiltrators. CNN paid Johnny Antifa $70k to instigate and film the entrapment and murder of Trumpers so MSM could frame MAGA hatters for Pelosis J6 Insurrection.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
INSIDE JOB Giant magnetic doors can't be opened except from the inside. Plain clothes 'Trumper' (waived on by Cops without fight) signals to Capitol Police, who then opens giant doors! CP did everything under Pelosis orders.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
INSIDE JOB Pelosi didnt call for backup. To the contrary, Pelosi used Capitol Police to rile up the crowd and push them inside the Capitol using tear gas!
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
FEDS ORCHESTRATE IT FedEpps whispers into Antifa guys ear, then Antifa guy reverses MAGA hat to signal Rioters to BREECH barriers around Capitol. Note: only BLM raise their hands to Cops and say 'don't shoot' (as they falsely allege of Michael Brown).
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
ANITFA ORCHESTRATES IT Johnny Sullivan said hes BLM and his brother said his brother Johnny is Antifa and orchestrated Capitol breech. Johnny said: "We gotta pull Trump out of office. We need Revolution!" Aka violent Insurrection.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Johnny Antifa brags: "We did it! Wait was that recorded?" Lol! Aka Johnny orchestrated the Capitol breach to escort unsuspecting Trumpers inside to be murdered.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
On J5, Fed Epps and Johnny Antifa just chilling, inciting Captiol Breech.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
FedEpps (seen moments earlier with Antifa Johnny) suggests on J5: "I don't even like to say it cus I'll be arrested... but tomorrow we need to go INTO the Capitol." Trumpers respond: "Fed! Fed! Fed!" And mock Epps lol.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Ray Epps texted his nephew: "I orchestrated it." To deflect, Epps later said he was no longer there when he texted that & it was a joke. But surveillance video proves Epps orchestrated it and lied when he said he was no longer there.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
1. Watch two groups in tug of war: the first damage the Capitol, the second protect it. The first group is well-equipped Feds & lowkey BLM/Antifa with false flag MAGA hats on. Second group is Trumpers.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Other angles and examples of Trumpers protecting the Capitol and human lives:
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
2. Michael Byrd, Pelosis right hand man, murdered unarmed female Trump supporter Ashley Babbit in cold blood. Deadly force is never justified unless a Cop fears for his life. 100 lbs peaceful protestor Ashley posed zero threat. Why not shoot in arm or leg?
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Here is the admittedly farfetched alternative 'rabbit hole view' of why Byrd wasn't charged with murder: because Ashley's still alive: https://rumble.com/v24cfg0-ashley-babbitt-hoax-by-wooz-news-everything-wrong-with-the-capitol-shooting.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
Ashley Babbitt Hoax by Wooz News: 'Everything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting in 21 Minutes or Less'
Ashley Babbitt Hoax by Wooz News: 'Everything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting in 21 Minutes or Less' Video shows too many inconsistencies with the Ashley Babbitt incident. Use your own discernment on
rumble.com
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
2. Trumpers try to rescue Roseanne Boyle from being beaten to death by Capitol Police.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Trumpers call out Y physically STOP Antifa. So much for MSM narrative! See well-coordinated FEDS (not prosecuted) break glass (some vids show Capitol Police HOLDING DOORS OPEN for sightseers). WHO is the non-existent Trumper charged with BREAKING Y entry?
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
3. Guided Tour with Drum Circle. Very very little property damage. No sit ins. Chansley quotes Trump saying be peaceful, be nice to men in blue, and go home. The DNV sit in at Wisconsin Capitol 2011 was much more interrupting and angry.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Chansley pretty chill. Like hey dudes, wanna Capitol Breech and Chill?
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
3. It takes 8 or 10 Cops to keep Qanon Shaman in check? Notice there's no crowds, Cops aren't scared lol. Why don't they arrest him if he's trespassing? Garland would say DOJ can't arrest because Police on the ground chose not to arrest.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
3. How many of yall copying me without credit? Lol. Cops act as door men and literally open Capitol doors for "trespassers". Pelosi opened magnetic doors! Is this the ultimate in entrapment. Old woman to Hansel & Gretel: come in kids we have goodies 4u!
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Trumpers help save Capitol Police. You can't script this!
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Stories @January6thCmte withheld: @CapitolPolice👮♂️Tarik Johnson & Oath Keeper Michael Nichols lead trapped USCP officers out of Capitol Lies of @libradunn Capitol Police Were Sacrificial Pawns on Jan. 6 - (Pt3) @TPC4USA https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3544429/capitol-police-were-sacrificial-pawns-on-jan-6-part-3
Capitol Police Were Sacrificial Pawns on Jan. 6 - (Part 3)
As I’ve detailed in Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, The United States Capitol Police (USCP) frontline officers were purposefully blindsided by the events of January 6, 2021. Their leadership withheld vital intel, as well as information about the legally permitted events to take place that day on the Capitol lawn. Emerging from that day’s riotous melee were both heroes and villains. As we have become painfully aware over the last three years, what is force-fed us by our government officials and their sycophant media sources is far too often the exact opposite of the truth.This story is yet another such example . . . (Editorial Note: After I initially published this article, I was contacted by former USCP Lt. Tarik Johnson to make one important clarification to the story. Something which occurred before he rescued the 16 officers from the Capitol Building Rotunda area with the help of two Oath Keepers. He explained that was his second attempt to extract those trapped officers. His first attempt was initiated with the assistance of USCP Civil Disturbance Unit (CDU) officers, but the officers they were attempting to evacuate may not have been able to hear his directions because of the crowd noise in the Rotunda area. It was also during that first rescue attempt that a protestor put the red MAGA hat on his head, which then drew international attention to his story.) At 2:58 pm on January 6, 2021, USCP officer Lt. Tarik Johnson, having just completed the evacuation of the House of Representatives chamber, radioed the Command Center:“All right. Sir, I think the House side is totally clear.”A couple of minutes later, a USCP officer identifying himself as “Unit Motor 13” radioed a distress call:“We have about half a dozen officers that are trapped between hundreds of people and the Rotunda doors that cannot get out. The crowd is very hostile and we need additional officers here, hardened platoons with munitions to be able to clear these steps. It's an officer safety issue.”Having received no response for assistance, Motor 13 issued another distress call:“. . . on the center Rotunda steps we have approximately, maybe 13 officers up here. None of us are in hard gear. We have a few -- we have about a half dozen officers that are trapped between the Rotunda door and the crowd.”Hearing those messages, Lt. Johnson asked for the operator to patch him direct to Motor 13. Receiving confirmation for his request, Lt. Johnson radioed an instruction to that officer:“Just walk through the crowd and be friendly and walk out yourself. They’ll probably let you out. And advise the situation as you're walking through and be nice. But they'll probably let you out. Just be nice and walk down the steps.”This might seem an unusual directive, but Lt. Johnson had been moving back and forth through the growing crowd of protestors inside the Capitol — having successfully initiated the evacuation of both the Senate and House chambers — for almost an hour. Something in his demeanor was allowing him to pass through these protestors without eliciting aggression or impedance, even from the more hostile of those filling up the Capitol Building.By contrast, during this same period, USCP Officer Harry Dunn was having an opposite experience with protestors. This was despite the fact Dunn was carrying an M4 automatic rifle. At 2:39 pm, he was captured on a DC Metropolitan Police officer’s bodycam, screaming at and threatening protestors in The Crypt:“You’ll be finished, in one f-cking minute. You’re f-cking hurting us. Get the f-ck out of here. Get the f-ck out of here. You’re hurting us. You’re hurting us.”Dunn was quickly approached by a USCP captain who put his hand on Dunn’s shoulder, imploring him to calm down.USCP Captain rushing over to calm down Officer Harry Dunn in the Crypt room of the US Capitol Building (Source: DC Metro Police bodycam)In an interview that I recently conducted with another, unnamed USCP officer who has reached out to me with his own J6 story, he shared that officer Dunn was assigned as his Field Training Officer (FTO) when he graduated from the USCP Academy. Part of the training he received from Dunn was in “de-escalation” tactics when dealing with unruly protestors. In that phone interview, I played for the unnamed officer the audio quoted above. The officer responded:“Wow. That’s the exact opposite behavior for which he trained me.” After Lt. Johnson’s suggested behavior for Motor 13 and his group, to successfully extract themselves from their tenuous position in the mob, Motor 13 responded:“I don’t believe that's the situation considering a couple of us have already been pepper sprayed by personnel in the crowd. I don't believe that's the situation right now.”Beginning to consider how he would take action to rescue these officers who were “trapped” — in Motor 13’s own words — Lt. Johnson radioed:“Does anyone have a bullhorn that I could use? I need a bullhorn. Any arrest kits anywhere close and I’ll go get it.”The Operator responds to Lt. Johnson:“Simulcasting for 405-J, [Lt. Johnson’s call sign] I’ve got 20 ATF and FBI [tactical units] at the speaker’s lobby, where do you want them?”Lt. Johnson replies: “South barricade, I’ll meet them at the south barricade.”Operator: “They're already at the center, Speaker's lobby sir.”Johnson: “Are they in the building already, you said?”Operator: “They affirm, at Speaker's lobby. Johnson: “Have them meet me at the Senate door, tell them to come back out of the building, we're going to go get the officers on the Rotunda steps.”Minutes go by with no response from the ATF and FBI tactical units. Lt. Johnson again radios a request for a bullhorn:“I need a Unit to get me a bullhorn. I need the FBI Unit or whatever responding units to meet me at the Senate door. Right now the demonstrators aren’t . . . protestors they're not hitting anybody, they're not doing anything to harm anybody. I need a bullhorn, I will use those officers and I will walk through the crowd and I will get them myself and we will do so safely. I just need a bullhorn. Can I get any Unit to get me a bullhorn? Bring it outside the Senate door. That's all I need. A bullhorn and those officers.”At some point during these radio exchanges, Lt. Johnson managed to acquire and don a red Make America Great Again ball cap. As Joe Hanneman of The Epoch Times reported, “Johnson said wearing the MAGA cap made the crowds more receptive to him, provided a level of safety that he likened to a tactical helmet, and served as a de-escalation tool.”Frustrated that he’s getting no response from the tactical teams, his additional calls for other units, and the bullhorn, Lt. Johnson again takes matters into his own hands. “Again,” because over an hour earlier Johnson had similar frustration when seeking permission from Assistant Chief Yoganada Pittman to evacuate both the Senate and House chambers, receiving no responses. As he told The Epoch Times:“I begged for help all day on Jan. 6, 2021, and I feel I was largely ignored . . . There was no response from anybody at the Command Center,” Johnson said. “I say even before I initiated evacuation, I say specifically, ‘We’ve got to start thinking about getting the people out before we don’t have a chance to.’ I heard no response. Then I asked for permission to evacuate. I heard no response.”Lt. Johnson radios:“Stand by, stand down, stand down. I'm going to go get them. Stand down.”Motor 13 responds:“Just be advised, you may also want to know that there's a window up here on the Center Rotunda steps, on the north side of the door, a window that has been breached. And if we leave this area they're going to have free reign to walk into the Capitol from this window.”Johnson:“I don't care if they go into the Capitol, they’ve got 1,500 people in the Capitol already. The only thing I'm concerned about is getting the officers off of the stairs. I just need a bullhorn and don't . . . thank you I got a bullhorn.”At this point, Lt. Johnson goes radio silent and encounters two Oath Keepers, one of whom was retired New York Police Sgt. Michael Nichols. This unfolding scene was famously captured by videographer Rico La Starza.From Starza’s video, we can hear the exchange in which the two Oath Keepers identify themselves to Johnson, and ask him how they can help. “If you guys can help me save some of the guys. If you can help me get aside these people, I’d appreciate it. I just need to get these other officers out. They’re scared. We’re getting beat up, but the people who didn’t go for help are laughing at us,” Johnson said.US Capitol Police Lt. Tarik Johnson with Oath Keepers “Steve” (center) and Michael Nichols outside of Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. (Source: Rico La Starza via The Epoch Times)Oath Keeper Michael Nichols shows his badge to Johnson and says, “I can do that. I can help,” said Nichols. Johnson then handed Nichols the bullhorn he’d acquired, and Nichols says, “All right, let’s go,” and begins heading toward the east stairs of the Capitol Building. Reaching the bottom of the stairs, Johnson says to Nichols, “Just let me hold onto you.” “We’re Here. We’ve Got You,” Nichols responds, as he takes the lead, with Johnson following — holding the hand of Nichols — and the second Oath Keeper taking the rear position with his hand on Johnson’s back.At 3:11 pm, the trio ascends the steps approaching the east side Columbus doors as one of them announces, “We’re Oath Keepers. Stand aside. Make a hole. We’re Oath Keepers.” The protestors part and allow them to pass. 31 minutes earlier — at 2:40 pm — the now infamous “Stack One” of Oath Keepers had already entered through those historic Columbus doors. Among this particular group of Oath Keepers were those now convicted of a wide range of felony charges in the first of three Oath Keepers trials. Included in this stack was Ken Harrelson, who was the first of the Oath Keepers to encounter USCP Officer Harry Dunn, who had just raced to the top of the Rotunda stairs carrying his M4 rifle. Highly distressed, Dunn shouted at Harrelson, “Officers down!”Harrelson: “Really?”Harrelson and the other Oath Keepers had not seen or even heard of any violence against law enforcement up to this point. Harrelson had been engaged in a security detail, escorting a group of VIPs from The Ellipse, some of whom were scheduled to speak at a stage on the Capitol grounds. An event that had been legally permitted by the Capitol Police weeks before January 6 . . . before the December 19, 2020 announcement of President Trump’s speech at The Ellipse.Harrelson’s protectees were led from The Ellipse to the Capitol’s east lawn without incident, navigating thousands of rally attendees who were moving toward the Capitol for the many scheduled speeches and marches to take place that afternoon. They arrived several minutes before protesters began breaching those east-side barricades and running toward the Capitol’s steps. Harrelson, nor any other Oath Keeper participated in that breach, only moving in the direction of the Capitol after police had been ordered to withdraw and those barricades had been removed. Even after taking a position on the Capitol steps, waiting for other Oath Keepers to arrive while singing the National Anthem along with the crowd, Harrelson had not witnessed any violence. When he finally moved with the surging throng through the Columbus doors, there was no longer any resistance from the small group of USCP officers at the doorway.Dunn continued:“Yes . . . [inaudible] . . . ‘em out on stretchers. They are f-cking us up . . . [inaudible]. Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Jessica Watkins, and Ken Harrelson (L to R) take a positionbetween January 6 protestors and USCP Officer Harry Dunn (in back) (Source: Unknown)Harrelson and three other Oath Keepers immediately took up position between officer Dunn and the more agitated and unruly protestors. They stand side by side, with their backs turned to Dunn, facing the protestors. Publicly available videos capture this crucial event. At one point, Harrelson can be seen using both extended arms to hold back protestors from Dunn’s position at the top of the staircase. Several eyewitness accounts attest to the fact this small group of Oath Keepers de-escalated an extremely volatile situation, as some of those protesters being kept from Dunn were taunting him, calling him a variety of names.One protestor shouted at Dunn, “You’re a bully. You’re a bully with a badge!” Others can be heard chanting, “Oathbreaker! Oathbreaker.”Keeping those more hostile elements of the crowd away from Dunn probably saved lives, as the highly-distressed officer was near a breaking point. Within only a few minutes, hard unit officers arrived at the top of the staircase and led Dunn away.Oath Keeper Ken Harrelson holds back unruly protestors, keeping them awayfrom USCP Officer Harry Dunn (Source: Stephen Horn)There was one word not heard or captured on video being chanted by any of those protestors. The “N-word.”In Officer Dunn’s many press interviews, in his FBI interviews, and in his testimony before the January 6 House Select Committee, Dunn often repeated the claim that he had been called the N-word by many protestors. There were multiple variations of the same story he repeated, but in a podcast interview by The New York Times reporter, Michael Barbaro, Dunn explained:“I can’t fight nobody else. I can’t. I’m tired. And it’s like 30, or 40, 50 people. I can’t fight y’all. Let’s talk, man. So they started talking about how Joe Biden didn’t win the election . . . And I said I voted for Joe Biden. Does my vote not count?“And then — and then that’s when the girl said, ‘You hear that? This n-word voted for Joe Biden, guys.’ And then the whole 20, 30, 40, 50 people that were there said, ‘this n-word voted for Joe Biden. Boo!’”Except, in what was probably the most recorded event in human history, with at least one out of three protestors holding their cell phone cameras aloft, there has been no video or audio evidence presented that this racist, N-word chant ever took place on January 6.In one of my face-to-face meetings with Lt. Tarik Johnson, he was accompanied by another, now-retired USCP officer. (Dunn, Johnson, and this unnamed officer are all black men.) I asked the two about that story Officer Dunn had repeated so many times.The unnamed officer stopped me, “Are you asking me if anyone called Dunn a n-gger that day?”“Yes.”“Never happened,” he resolutely responded.Another story by The New York Times related how many USCP officers were not thrilled with Dunn constantly sharing the N-word story in his many press interviews. “To some, when Dunn talked about the racism he endured on Jan. 6, he made it sound as if it was ‘all about race.’”During my interview with the unnamed USCP officer first mentioned in this story, he went into further detail about his relationship with Dunn during the 12 weeks in which Dunn was his FTO. Dunn “seemed like a good guy, very professional, and down to earth,” but “he always had a way of bringing racism or black culture into conversations.”This officer went on to tell me, “We lost our relationship after January 6. He [Dunn] even deleted me from social media. That is the general feeling throughout the force.”Another telling revelation in my interview with this unnamed USCP officer was the fact he also had a rather low opinion of Lt. Johnson, despite that they don’t personally know one another. This comes from the fact that two officers in his unit were part of the 16 rescued by Johnson and the two Oath Keepers. They had relayed to this officer that Johnson had unnecessarily “endangered them” by escorting them through the crowd of protesters. According to this officer, his unit members did not feel “trapped” or “unsafe” in their location near the Rotunda doors.What those two
thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
2. Antifa censor thread already. Here AGAIN is Trumpers physically fighting to STOP Antifa as they break windows into the Capitol. You won't see this vid on CNN lol.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
1. TEAR GAS FORCES CROWD TO BREAK THE POLICE LINE: (OP censored so here's redo)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Rich is called over and told to put something under the scaffolding. There is some confusion and back-and-forth between the speakers. They mention being fired up and someone says to shoot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rich. Rich has a 40. Rich, over here. 40. Hey, Rich.
Yeah. Put it under the fucking scaffolding. Hey. Hey. I'll make sure Oh, no.
Yes. No. No. I'm gonna go with that. Sorry.
Go back. We're fired up in the air, Rich. Over there. Alright. Alright.
Before this, I don't have my I got it. Go. Just fucking shoot.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
AFTER TEAR GAS: BREAK LINE TO GET AIR Note that TWO MEN DIED from canister munitions and tear gas inhalation, and even Cops needed long timeouts for gas inhalation. Capitol Police were 10x more agressive on J6 with tear gas than at Lafeyette Square, but MSM selectively outraged.
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
JOURNALIST'S VIDEO THREAD OF PELOSI'S STASI TEAR GAS ATTACK ON PROTESTORS
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
3. LITERAL FALSE FLAG Pelosi's Stasi carry Confederate Flags to frame Trumpers for white supremacy. Not even subtle guys! Oh youuuu! lol
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Let's just pretend that this Antifa guy wasn't handing out makeshift weapons to his buddies FROM INSIDE THE CAPITOL. Who put them there? Have any of them been prosecuted or do they have liberal immunity from prosecution? Lol. #LiberalPrivilege
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
More stories of Trumpers RESCUING Capitol Police. Thank God for Trumpers being there to STOP the violent Pelosi Stasisurrectionists!
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Nichols & Steve, two Oath Keepers and others would go into the @uscapitol at the request of a desperate @CapitolPolice lieutenant and rescue 15 riot-gear-clad officers and one uniformed officer trapped inside You won’t hear that from @January6thCmte https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-retired-police-sergeant-oath-keeper-helped-rescue-capitol-police-on-jan-6-at-the-moment-the-world-needed-it_4811330.html
EXCLUSIVE: Retired Police Sergeant, Oath Keeper Helped Rescue Capitol Police on Jan. 6 'At the Moment the World Needed It'
theepochtimes.com
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Fedsurrectionist comedian Ray Epps incites violence by bludgeoning Capitol Police using GIANT MAGA SIGN to frame Trumpers lol! https://t.co/3mncyAuk3N
@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns
Ray Epps has been seen on @uscapitol steps helping shove a giant @realDonaldTrump sign into @DCPoliceDept & @CapitolPolice, & has never been arrested An LA Times reporter caught him on camera afterwards, back in the crowd, talking to people https://t.co/wXisaFXNMz
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Last Redo: INSIDE JOB Pelosi didnt call for backup. To the contrary, Pelosi used Capitol Police to rile up the crowd and push them inside the Capitol using tear gas! See peaceful BEFORE video and less peaceful AFTER video: https://t.co/6VpWrcfHxw
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
BEFORE TEAR GAS PEACEFUL https://t.co/WllPrlqzgO
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
AFTER TEAR GAS: CROWD BREAKS POLICE LINE, FORCING STAGED MELEE 2 DIED from cannister munitions! Even Cops had to take time out from gas inhalation. CP on J6 100x more aggressive with tear gas than CP at Lafeyette Square, but MSM selectively outraged! https://t.co/6ezsCVum75
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
HERES THE OBVIOUSLY STAGED MELEE THAT PELOSI HERSELF CREATED BY SHOOTING TEAR GAS AT A PEACEFUL CROWD https://t.co/C9eQW2Xuhx
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
1. Add Mitchell Gardner to the list of Antifa infiltrators who attacked CP & broke windows with MAGA Hats to frame Trumpers. FBI called Mitchell 'defacto ringleader of Capitol Riots and attack on police'! Mitchell, Johnny and Epps orchestrated it. https://t.co/UsQgFPBiZa
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
Turns out 'MAGA Hat dude' BREAKING CAPITOL WINDOW on J6 and INJURING COPS with Pepper Spray IS ANTIFA like Trumpers In J6 video chanted 'Antifa'! Trumpers were right: Capitol Breechers were infiltrators posing as Trumpers! He voted Obama 2x, never Trump. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-florida-man-supported-obama-and-didn-t-vote-for-trump-then-he-stormed-the-capitol-pepper-sprayed-cops-broke-a-2-900-window-and-got-4-5-years-in-prison/ar-AA18OMXa?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=f25e0f6242144de0aa6782738d95d128&ei=25 https://t.co/dz68wQplp7
@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs
1. Capitol Police act as cheer leaders and tour guides of Pelosis Insurrectionists: https://t.co/KZpZmSPYFB
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: Never seen before footage emerges of Jacob Chansley calling the FBI after the Jan 6th protest.. https://t.co/Qh9kwtRNVm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, I'm Jake. I heard you're looking for me because of my involvement in the Capitol building incident. I wanted to call and address it. I'm not sure where I am right now, but I don't believe in running or hiding. I believe in the truth, my faith, and my country. I'm willing to talk and provide any information you need. I'll call the FBI after this. They're a bigger deal than the DCPD. Just let me know when you're ready to give me their number.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Yeah. My name is Jake. The reason for the call is because I heard y'all are looking for me. I heard y'all are, trying to get information on me.
I'm the dude that was in the horns in the capital building. So I just thought I'd call you guys because I heard you guys are looking for information on me or or all that stuff. So I thought I'd call and nip, nip it in the bud. Where are you selling, bro? I don't know.
I'm not a 100%. We're kind of on the road. I'd rather just, figure out what you guys want. What's that? Because, man, apparently, people been telling me all over Internet that that DCPD said that I'm a, I'm wanted, as a, person of interest, quote, unquote, for quote unquote unlawful entry of the senate.
And, apparently, that I've been told by more than 1 person the FBI is looking for. So I'm not the type of guy that is gonna, like, run and hide. I don't do that. I I don't believe in that. I'm I'm a bold man.
I believe in the truth. I believe in my faith in god and in country. And so I'm calling to see what y'all would like to talk about. What kind of information y'all we're looking for. Sure.
Let me just get that one second. Hold on. What's that? Yeah. I'm about to call them after I call you guys.
To me, you know, god love DCPD, but, to me the FBI is a little bit bigger of a fish than, DCPD. So I figured I'd call you guys ready for that number whenever you are ready to give it, sir. 202 278.
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: Video emerges of Capitol police smiling while HOLDING DOORS OPEN for protesters on J6.. WON’T SEE THIS ON CNN.. https://t.co/ywl9o2Ly3S
Video Transcript AI Summary
Capitol Police officer appears to be smiling and holding the door open, suggesting that he is not under attack.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know. Call me crazy, but that Capitol Police officer, he's smiling, and he's holding the door open. Doesn't look like he's being attacked to me.
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
Democrats *love* releasing bodycam footage Unless it destroys their January 6th narratives of course https://t.co/np8cesGSL2
@DC_Draino - DC_Draino
EXPOSED: January 6th Committee caught adding provocative special effects to Capitol Security footage videos Newly obtained J6 tapes have no sound & Capitol Police confirmed that’s what they gave to J6 Cmte What other parts of J6 have they lied about? https://justthenews.com/videos/new-jan-6-security-footage https://justthenews.com/videos/new-jan-6-security-footage
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the involvement of volunteers in a center for hearing impaired individuals. They mention the challenges faced by the center and the need for urgent action. The speaker also mentions the names of various individuals and their roles. They briefly mention a TV show called "Master Chen" and the use of masks. The transcript ends abruptly without a clear conclusion.
Full Transcript
Майкле омікрон омікрон омікрон омікрон волонтер волонтер макрон волонтер еко отого отого центром слух центром центром земля земля змушені у стій стій начальниця начальниця чумак екстреної на стане червоні пір начальниця начальниця чумак екстреної на стане червоні пір Існуючих Існуючі ангел ангеліна 68 ангеліна антон 68 ангеліна олії ангеліна олії ангеліна андрій ангеліна андрій олії чен галі андрій ельзи андрій емілі година олії серіал майстер чен проїхали чен масці на на на їв кг та шкалою існуючих Існуючі ангел ангеліна 68 ангеліна антон 68 ангеліна олії ангеліна олії ангеліна андрій ангеліна андрій олії чен галі андрій ельзи андрій емілі година олії серіал майстер чен проїхали чен масці на на на їв кг та шкалою шиї ефективно
Watch: How Jan. 6 security footage was altered by Democrats to add provocative sound
January 6th, 2021 Capitol Hill security footage, obtained by Just The News.
justthenews.com
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Tucker Carlson BLOWS The Doors Off January 6th LIES. Reveals Fox News REFUSED To Air His J6 Interview Of Capitol Chief Of Police PROVING "The US Capitol Was FILLED With Federal Agents" Tucker Describes Fox Execs Attacking him For J6 Report: "F**k You!” Narrative Collapse. Wow https://t.co/30UijETvNq
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was interested in January 6th from the start, especially since my child was nearby during the events. I oppose all violence and was appalled by the actions that day. The immediate narrative labeled it a racist insurrection, which I found misleading. Many believed the election was stolen, and there was no effort to reassure them about the integrity of the voting process. Over time, it became clear that significant claims about January 6th were false. For instance, the treatment of individuals like Jacob Chansley, who was escorted by police, raises questions about the narrative. I believe it was a chaotic reaction, not an insurrection, and the media's handling of the situation has been troubling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kinda narrow the available population down significantly.
Speaker 1: It's just me now. I'm the only person who sees that as an advantage. Oh, well, I am honored. Do as you will. But also, on that, they said, of course, these FBI whistleblowers that the FBI had significant number of agents, that there were other law enforcement agencies there on January 6th.
In fact, it was the whistleblower on this subject that caused them all this grief. They in a sense that there are some discrepancies, shall we say, on how that event was initially reported on, with regards to what actually went down. Now what you've been accused of in the mainstream after you received, I think it was like, 40000 hours of footage from your man McCarthy there, was that you, sort of cherry picked is the phrase that often comes up, footage to deliberately show that it was, to to a degree, a peaceful event. What is your sincere opinion of what went on on January 6th? And why do you feel that there is, yet an attempt to regard it as a deliberate insurrection?
And and also within that, I guess, the the possibility for presenting moments of peace within 4,000 hours of footage does exist. So were you sincere in your presentation, or do you have a particular perspective on how it would affect you?
Speaker 0: I have well, let me just say one of my children was there working in the building and called me during it, and was right nearby when Ashley Babbitt was shot. So I was interested in it from the moment it happened. I was appalled by the vandalism outside by fighting with police officers. I hate violence from abortion to the war in Ukraine. I mean, I am consistent on that.
I'm not a Catholic, but I I share those I definitely share those views. I'm not for the death penalty, not for killing people, not for hurting people, not for violence. And I and I'm I've had those views for a long time. So, you know, any violence on January 6th, I oppose. I've said that many times.
I would was kind of happy to leave it where it was, which is this got completely out of hand. The only reason I ever got involved in commenting on it was and we did a show that night saying, well, this is awful. Right? What happened? Was the lying about it was immediate.
This was a racist white supremacist insurrection. Okay. There was no indication to this day that race had anything to do with it at all, like, nothing. These are people who thought the election was stolen from them. There's some evidence they were right.
We could debate that, but that's what they thought. That's a meaningful thing. If you've got a big population in your country that doesn't believe that your elections are on the level, you need to figure out a way to convince them that the elections are on the level or else you can't have democracy because it's a faith based system. So that was the first thing I noticed. There was no effort at all to convince people.
Actually, electronic voting machines are secure, which they are not. By the way, that's a lie. In any country that has electronic voting machines is by definition at risk of having its election stolen. By definition, no country that cared about democracy would have electronic voting machines. Okay?
First thing. But no one even by the way, many Democrats have made that point. Not now, but Mhmm. 10 years ago. There was no effort to reassure anybody.
They immediately used it as a cudgel to make their political opponent shut up, in a lot of cases, to send them to jail. So I noticed this. I'm like, wait a second. Nobody here is operating in good faith at all. They're just immediately lying with maximum aggression.
And anyone who asks questions about it like me, and if you could go back and look at the tape, my first five shows on January 6th were like, well, yeah, it's bad, but I don't think you're telling the truth about what actually happened. Shut up, racist. What? So that's always the key for me. If it's like an infection, you know it's infected when it hurts.
You press it. You recoil. They immediately recoiled when you have to any questions about January 6th, and that was a tip-off to me. I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watch this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that US law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it. That never crossed my mind.
I never thought there was it was a false flag or anything like that. I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that. And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way. I was fired before it could air.
I I'm gonna interview him again. But Steven Sund was the totally nonpolitical worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is not some right wing activist. He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, and he said, oh, yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. That crowd was filled with federal agents. What? Yes. Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site.
So the more time has passed, now it's been two and a half years, it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6th were lies. In my view about events and about people is if you catch someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is what else are you lying about? If you say to your wife, where were you? I was at the grocery store. If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises, okay.
Probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you? Like, what is this exactly? Why were you lying about that? And that's kind of the way I feel about January. Like, what is this?
What this is they're clearly lying. That's provable. Why? And, you know, I'm the last person. I'm often accused of being a conspiracy, not on the opposite.
I grew up in a very stable country, the United States in the seventies eighties where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot. Right? I mean, we took things at face value. We trusted our government by and large. But I the amount of lying around January 6th, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing.
And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself, and that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News. People at Fox News Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that, and I'm grateful that they did. But there, you know, there are people there who were mad at me for airing that. Really? Why?
If if you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me show me where. And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful. It it wasn't. Police officers were injured. More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever.
All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad. I'm not certainly not making excuses for it, but I'm asking obvious questions. You said this happened. For example, there was a guy called the QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley. They put the guy in prison for years.
There is surveillance tape that they hid until I aired it showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors trying to get into the senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in. And he kind of wanders around like he's taken a hit of mescal and just kinda you know what I mean? And, like, he says a prayer. He thanks god for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out. Now there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist.
That's a lie. And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning, and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in. I mean, that's what I do. I use words for a living, so I care about their specific meanings. That was not an insurrection.
It was not armed, and its purpose was not to overthrow the government. It was it was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely it helped inspire. That's true. And, at the election results. Okay.
You know? But I'm not actually for that. I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general, but that's what it was. It was not an insurrection. And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, a navy veteran in jail for years after he was let into the senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that and I'm the bad guy?
Fuck you. Like, what what do you make of that? I'm sorry. It makes me mad just thinking about it. I said I wasn't gonna be a hater.
That makes me mad. And I see people on other channels. It's outrageous. You're trying to minimize January 6th. Well but what this guy went to prison.
Went to prison. You ever been to prison?
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Tucker Carlson said the Chief of the Police at the Capitol told him in an interview that the crowd on J-6 was FILLED with federal agents. Fox News took Tucker off the air before the interview was released. https://t.co/Mh0cZNY7Nv
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's clear that the narrative around January 6th has been misleading. Initially, I didn't suspect any involvement from law enforcement or military agencies. However, after interviewing Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who confirmed the presence of federal agents, I began to question the official story. The lies surrounding January 6th are evident, and if someone lies about one thing, it raises doubts about everything else. For instance, Jacob Chansley, known as the Qanon Shaman, was imprisoned despite being escorted by police into the Senate chamber. This situation highlights the misuse of terms like "insurrection" and the unjust treatment of individuals based on misleading narratives. It's infuriating to see people suffer due to these lies without any accountability from those perpetuating them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know it's infected when it hurts. You press it. You recoil. They immediately recoiled when you asked any questions about January 6th, and that was a tip-off to me. I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watched this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that US law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it.
That never crossed my mind. I never thought there was was a false flag or anything like that. I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that. And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way.
I was fired before could air. I I'm gonna interview him again. But Steven Sund was the totally nonpolitical, worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is not some right wing activist. He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, and he said, oh, yeah.
Yeah. That guy was filled with federal agents. What? Yes. Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site.
So the more time has passed, now it's been two and a half years, it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6th were lies. And my view about events and about people is if you catch someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is, what else are you lying about? If you say to your wife, where were you? I was at the grocery store. If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises all, okay.
Probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you? Like, what is this exactly? Why were you lying about that? And that's kind of the way I feel about January. Like, what is this?
What this is they're clearly lying. That's provable. Why? And, you know, I'm the last person. I'm often accused of being a conspiracy, not on the opposite.
I grew up in a very stable country, the United States in the seventies eighties where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot. Right? I mean, we took things at face value. We trusted our government by and large. But I the amount of lying around January 6th, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing.
And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself. And that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News. People at Fox News Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that. And I'm grateful that they did. But there, you know, there are people there who were mad at me for airing that.
Really? Why? If if you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me show me where. And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful. It it wasn't.
Police officers were injured. More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever. All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad. I'm not certainly not making excuses for it, but I'm asking obvious questions. You said this happened.
For example, there was a guy called the Qanon Shaman, Jacob Chansley. They put the guy in prison for years. There is surveillance tape that they hid until I aired it showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors trying to get into the senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in. And he kind of wanders around like he's taking a hit of mescal and just kinda you know what I mean? And, like, he says a prayer.
He thanks god for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out. Now there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist. That's a lie. And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in. I mean, that's what I do.
I use words for a living so I care about their specific meanings. That was not an insurrection. It was not armed, and its purpose was not to overthrow the government. It was it was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely helped inspire. That's true.
And, at the election results. Okay. You know? But I'm not actually for that. I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general, but that's what it was.
It was not an insurrection. And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, a navy veteran in jail for years after he was let into the senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that and I'm the bad guy? Fuck you. Like, what what do you make of that? I'm sorry.
It makes me mad just thinking about it. I said I wasn't gonna be a hater. That makes me mad. And I see people on other channels, it's outrageous. He's trying to minimize January 6th.
Well, but what this guy went to prison. Went to prison. You ever been to prison? Only for visit. Right.
Okay. It's not very nice. You don't wanna go to prison to take a man's freedom away and call him all these names for something he didn't do and then show no remorse at all when you're exposed to have lied about it. As a human being who was locked away in a prison, it's an outrage to me.
@WatchChad - Chad Prather
GRAPHIC: Previously unreleased footage of the J6 “insurrection” shows protesters violently strolling past capital guards. This is horrifying. https://t.co/Y5EGC74t3J
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: New footage emerges from inside the capitol CHALLENGING THE DEM NARRATIVE.. Footage shows Trump Supporters casually walking by security who just watch as they peacefully walk through the corridor.. https://t.co/SX90vwvmLL
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
🔥🚨BREAKING: The recent release of the J6 videos by Speaker Johnson appears to be proving the insurrection was an inside job. In this video alone we can see that Capitol police release a ‘protester’ and allowed him to keep his gear after he got out of view. https://t.co/p78iVQ8bLE
@Timcast - Tim Pool
The police facilitated January 6th This is why they withheld the tapes The J6 committee should be censured and expelled for lying to the public https://t.co/nO9tbNP4lH
@5dme81 - 5DME81
💥TRUTH💥Capitol Police holding the door walking in and walking out calmly. #J6Footage #NOTanInsurrection #DemocratCorruption https://t.co/3AgojWTXfs
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Here is Alex Jones on Jan 6 on a bullhorn urging people away from the US Capitol https://t.co/oSgPWPKYik
@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸
Here is Alex Jones on Jan 6 on a bullhorn urging people away from the US Capitol Twitter 1.0 suppressed these videos https://t.co/oSgPWPKqsM
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Tucker Carlson says the Chief of the Police at the Capitol told him in an interview that the crowd on J6 was FILLED with federal agents. Fox News took Tucker off the air before the interview was released. https://t.co/ZlFQW4I03R
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's clear that there were significant lies surrounding January 6th. Initially, I didn't suspect any involvement from law enforcement or military agencies. However, after interviewing Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who confirmed the presence of federal agents, my perspective changed. The narrative around January 6th has been misleading, particularly regarding individuals like Jacob Chansley, who was imprisoned despite being escorted by police. This raises serious questions about the labeling of the event as an insurrection. It was a moment of anger, not an armed coup. The treatment of Chansley and others is unjust, and the media's complicity in these lies is troubling. It's unacceptable to imprison someone for actions that were misrepresented, and the lack of accountability for those who lied is infuriating.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know it's infected when it hurts. You press it. You recoil. They immediately recoiled when you have to any questions about January 6th. And that was a tip-off to me.
I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watch this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that US law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it. That never crossed my mind. I never thought there was was a false flag or anything like that. I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that.
And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way. I was fired before Kadir. I I'm gonna interview him again. But Steven Sund was the totally nonpolitical, worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is not some right wing activist.
He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, and he said, oh, yeah. Yeah. That guy was filled with federal agents. What? Yes.
Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site. So the more time has passed, now it's been two and a half years, it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6th were lies. And my view about events and about people is if you catch someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is, what else are you lying about? If you say to your wife, where were you? I was at the grocery store.
If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises all, okay. Probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you? Like, what is this exactly? Why were you lying about that? And that's kind of the way I feel about January.
Like, what is this? What this is they're clearly lying. That's provable. Why? And, you know, I'm the last person.
I'm often accused of being a conspiracy, none of the opposite. I grew up in a very stable country, the United States in the seventies eighties where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot. Right? I mean, we took things at face value. We trusted our government by and large.
But I the amount of lying around January 6th, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing. And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself. And that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News. People at Fox News Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that. And I'm grateful that they did.
But there are, you know, there are people there who were mad at me for airing that. Really? Why? If if you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me show me where. And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful.
It it wasn't. Police officers were injured. More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever. All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad. I'm not certainly not making excuses for it, but I'm asking obvious questions.
You said this happened. For example, there was a guy called the QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley. They put the guy in prison for years. There is surveillance tape that they hid until I aired it showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors trying to get into senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in. And he kind of wanders around like he's taken a hit of mescal and just kinda you know what I mean?
And, like, he says a prayer. He thanks god for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out. Now there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist. That's a lie. And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in.
I mean, that's what I do. I use words for a living, so I care about their specific meanings. That was not an insurrection. It was not armed, and its purpose was not to overthrow the government. It was it was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely it helped inspire.
That's true. And, at the election results. Okay. You know? I'm not actually for that.
I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general, But that's what it was. It was not an insurrection. And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, a navy veteran in jail for years after he was let into the senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that and I'm the bad guy? Fuck you. Like, what what do you make of that?
I'm sorry. It makes me mad just thinking about it. I said I wasn't gonna be a hater. That makes me mad. And I see people on other channels, it's outrageous.
He's trying to minimize January 6th. Well, but what this guy went to prison. Went to prison. You ever been to prison? He only for visits.
Right. Okay. It's not very nice. You don't want him to prison to take a man's freedom away and call him all these names for something he didn't do and then show no remorse at all when you're exposed to have lied about it. As a human being who was locked away in a prison, it's an outrage to me.
@seymourtherat - Flashback with Seymour
FLASHBACK: In 2021, Antifa member John Sullivan and CNN's Jade Sacker lead a riot into the DC Capitol during Jan 6th. https://t.co/Ipd69ItdBy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Realities. Come on, man. We accomplished this shit. We did this shit together. Fuck this. Fuck this. Let's go. You guys are savage. Let's go. Let's go. Let's fucking go. Holy shit. You have to come with us now. Give me a sec. Give me your hand. Give hand. Hand. You got it? Yeah. Let's get him up. We gotta we gotta burn We gotta get this shit burned. Oh my god. We did this shit. We took this shit. What's up, bro? Fucking yeah. Fuck yeah. Fucking did this shit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Realities. Come on, man. We accomplished this shit. Come on. We did this shit together.
Fuck this. Fuck this. Let's go. You guys are savage. Let's go.
Let's go. Let's go. Let's fucking go. Holy shit. You have to come with us now.
Give me a sec. Give me your hand. Give hand. Hand. You got it?
Yeah. Let's get him up. We gotta we gotta burn We gotta get this shit burned. Oh my god. We did this shit.
We took this shit. What's up, bro? Fucking yeah. Fuck yeah. Fucking did this shit.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Tucker Carlson says the Chief of the Police at the Capitol told him in an interview that the crowd on J6 was FILLED with federal agents. Fox News took Tucker off the air before the interview was released. https://t.co/IoGl0uiFua
Video Transcript AI Summary
When questioning the events of January 6th, it became clear that there were lies being told. The speaker believes the media should be ashamed for covering up these lies. They argue that the actions of certain individuals, like Jacob Chansley, were not insurrectionist and should not have resulted in imprisonment. The speaker expresses anger at the lack of remorse shown by those responsible for the false narrative surrounding January 6th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know it's infected when it hurts, you press it, you recoil. They immediately recoiled when you asked any questions about January 6th and that was a tip-off to me. I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watch this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that US law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it. That never crossed my mind. I never thought there was was a false flag or anything like that.
I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that. And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Steven Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way. I was fired before Kadir. I I'm gonna interview him again.
But Stevenson was the totally nonpolitical, worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this is not some right wing activist. He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6th, and he said, oh, yeah. Yeah. That guy was filled with federal agents.
What? Yes. Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site. So the more time has passed, now it's been two and a half years, it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6th were lies. And my view about events and about people is if you kept someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is what else are you lying about?
If you say to your wife, where were you? I was at the grocery store. If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises all okay. Probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you? Like, what is this exactly?
Why were you lying about that? And that's kind of the way I feel about January. Like, what is this? What this is they're clearly lying. That's provable.
Why? And, you know, I'm the last person. I'm often accused of being a conspiracy, not on the opposite. I grew up in a very stable country, the United States in the seventies eighties where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot. Right?
I mean, we took things at face value. We trusted our government by and large. But I the amount of lying around January 6th, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing. And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself. And that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News.
People at Fox News, Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that. And I'm grateful that they did. But there are, you know, there are people there who were mad at me for airing that. Really? Why?
If if you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me show me where. And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful. It it wasn't. Police officers were injured. More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever.
All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad. I'm not certainly not making excuses for it, but I'm asking obvious questions. You said this happened. For example, there was a guy called the QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley. They put the guy in prison for years.
There is surveillance tape that they hid until I aired it showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors trying to get into the senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in. And he kind of wanders around like he's taking a hit of mescal and just kinda you know what I mean? And, like, he says a prayer. He thanks god for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out. Now there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist.
That's a lie. And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning, and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in. I mean, that's what I do. I use words for a living, so I care about their specific meanings. That was not an insurrection.
It was not armed, and its purpose was not to overthrow the government. It was it was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely it helped inspire. That's true. And, at the election results. Okay.
You know? But I'm not actually for that. I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general, but that's what it was. It was not an insurrection. And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, citizen, a navy veteran in jail for years after he was let into the senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that and I'm the bad guy?
Fuck you. Like, what what do you make of that? I'm sorry. It makes me mad just thinking about it. I said I wasn't gonna be a hater.
That makes me mad. And I see people on other channels, looks outrageous. He's trying to minimize January 6th. Well, but what this guy went to prison. Went to prison.
You ever been to prison? Only for visit. Right. Okay. It's not very nice.
You don't wanna go to prison. To take a man's freedom away and call him all these names for something he didn't do and then show no remorse at all when you're exposed to have lied about it as a human being who was locked away in a prison, it's an outrage to me.
@MAGAIncWarRoom - MAGA War Room
Fake News CNN cuts off @kleavittnh after she calls out Jake Tapper's anti-Trump history. CNN is afraid of people knowing the truth. https://t.co/Tku7Ew754v
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confronts the interviewer about their bias towards Donald Trump and attacks on colleagues. They express a desire to discuss Joe Biden and Trump impartially. The interviewer is asked to stop the interview if the attacks continue. The speaker is then cut off and the interview ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, it's so it takes someone 5 minutes to Google Jake Tapper, Donald Trump to see that Jake Tapper has Ma'am, can you just stop this interview if you're gonna keep my contact it all filtered. President's on the call. Adolf Hilter. Ma'am, I'm gonna stop this interview if you continue to attack my colleagues. I would like to talk about Joe Biden and Donald Trump who you work for.
Yes. If you are here
Speaker 1: to speak
Speaker 0: on his behalf, we will have this conversation. I am stating facts that your colleagues have stated in the past. Now, I'm sorry, guys. We're gonna
Speaker 1: come back out to the panel.
Speaker 0: Caroline, thank you very much for your time. You are welcome to come back
@NanLee1124 - NanLee Marie Carissimi
Tucker Carlson and @RepClayHiggins discuss what actually happened on J6… this is an excellent account from Clay! @TCNetwork MUST-WATCH… https://t.co/Rr6VSGMd2j
Video Transcript AI Summary
Three years after January 6th, questions remain about the events of that day and the FBI's involvement. Congressman Clay Higgins directly questioned FBI Director Chris Wray about whether FBI assets were embedded among the protesters. Higgins asserts that evidence suggests the FBI had undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol before the doors opened, potentially entrapping attendees. He estimates over 200 FBI assets were present, influencing the crowd and orchestrating actions leading to arrests. Higgins emphasizes the need for transparency and urges Speaker Mike Johnson to release all digital evidence from that day to the public, believing it will reveal the truth about the government's role in the events of January 6th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been exactly 3 years since January 6th, the events of January 6th. The racist insurrection that shocked this nation to its core, more profoundly than anything since Pearl Harbor plus the civil war. And it has taken a while, honestly, even for people who aren't on the side of the professional liars to realize there's something amiss about what happened that day. Not just the response, the largest law enforcement mobilization in the history of the United States that was obviously disproportionate, because it wasn't the worst riot that year, not even close. But the day itself, there was something about January 6th that didn't feel right, and hovering over that day has remained the question to what extent was it a setup.
And we still don't really know, but what's interesting is how few people have asked that entirely legitimate question. One of the very few, really one of the only in the United States Congress, is a member called Clay Higgins from Louisiana. In case you haven't seen this clip, it's worth rewatching. This is from 2022 at Homeland Security Committee hearing where he asked it just directly of the FBI director. Why?
Speaker 1: Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6th protesters and on January 6, 2021?
Speaker 2: Well, Congressman, as I'm sure you can appreciate, I have to be very careful about what I can say about when
Speaker 1: Even now, that's what you told us a few
Speaker 2: years ago. Matt finish. About when we do and do not and where we have and have not used confidential human sources. But to the extent that there's a suggestion, for example, that the FBI's confidential human sources or FBI employees in some way instigated or orchestrated January 6th, that's categorically false.
Speaker 1: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being open?
Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful
Speaker 1: with what be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capitol. Gentlemen, Pam has expired. You should
Speaker 2: not read anything into my decision not to share information Director Ray. Confidential.
Speaker 1: Gentleman's time has expired.
Speaker 0: What a sleazy, repulsive, little authoritarian liar Chris Wray is. That's obvious when you watch that tape. The sad part is so few tapes like that exist because so few have confronted him directly and asked questions to which the entire country has a right to know the answer like that one. Clay Higgins did that. Congressman from Louisiana Louisiana Lafayette joins us in studio.
Congressman, thanks so much for coming up.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Tuck.
Speaker 0: So that was over a year ago that you asked that question, which is a central question, and you asked it as I think is appropriate without any embarrassment at all on behalf of your constituents and the rest of the country. Are you any closer to the answer now?
Speaker 1: Well, we're closer to being in a position where we can reveal the answers that we already have. Much of the evidence that we have compiled from investigative effort over the the course of the last couple of years. Some offices like my own would have operated in silos of investigative endeavor, have now been able to come together now that we have a republican majority and we have access to the to the to the staffs of the appropriate investigative committees. And so I sit on the oversight committee and we republicans run that committee now, therefore we control the staff. So when you can magnify the efforts that individual, members of congress have have have pushed within our own offices.
When you can magnify those efforts by the the skill and the numbers of staff from the committees, you you get a lot of evidence reviewed professionally and aligned and assembled into essentially a case file. And in in this case, this is a big file because the the the involvement of of certain actors, and you could say deep state actors within the federal government, to set the stage for, what happened in in j 4, 5, and 6, and and to, entrap thousands of Americans from across the country and lure them into this this set stage on j 4, 5, and 6. The people that were involved in that is is is quite a large web. So, yes, sir. We do have a great deal of evidence compiled, and we are we are gradually, professionally, rolling that evidence out.
So you sort
Speaker 0: of answered the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume law enforcement intel and military, and I'm using your words, lured Americans to Washington into what you called a trap. Yes, sir. So that would I mean, that's a shocking and I assume that's a that's a sober conclusion based on the evidence. That's what you're saying.
Speaker 1: That's that would be my sober assessment as an investigator, and I'm, you know, I'm quite a I love my country, and and I've I've always been a staunch defender of the thin blue line. And I I would proudly count the FBI amongst that number. They're just like brothers to me. So to find that level of, of conspiratorial corruption at the highest levels of the FBI has been very troubling to me as a man, as a cop, and and yet did you know, you follow the evidence wherever it leads, and Yes. This is what investigators do.
So, when I asked Christopher Wray that that question, for instance, I already knew the answer. I had reviewed compelling evidence that the that FBI had assets, human assets, dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol prior to the doors being open and the masses allowed in. So now I I knew that the FBI was deeply involved. I'd seen evidence even at that time with, that the FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of Americans who were essentially voicing their their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about COVID oppression. Those Americans were targeted by the FBI, almost universally, Republicans and and, largely Trump supporters, but the FBI worked undercover to infiltrate those conversations and become a significant part of those individual Americans' communications.
And when you dig into the evidence that we've we've had revealed through through some criminal cases that I've I've followed and worked with the families of j six political detainees and Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in in the capital that day. And some of that evidence is shockingly reveals that the the the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were were the first ones to plant the seeds of of, suggestions of of a more radical occupation of the capital and and they were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would would begin acknowledging that, you know, yeah, may maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the the origins of those conversations, it it was started by the the FBI undercover guy that was operating inside the group. And then months later, on January 4th, 5th, 6th, many of those Americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where American patriots assembled to object to to everything that had happened during 2020, the COVID oppression, and the the stunning results of what we believe was a compromised election cycle in November 2020.
So Americans gathered at their own capital to to appropriately air grievances and protest at their capital, but embedded amongst their number was an FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months. So this was the level of of manipulative effort that the FBI invested into American citizenry and our our assembly online to, and to exercise our rights under the first amendment, to talk to each other about whatever we wanna talk about, including the the the insidious suppressions of COVID that we were suffering across the country. So and our concerns about where the election was going, the whole mail in ballot thing, we could see the stage was being set for a compromised election cycle possibly, and to our horror that's what happened. So FBI had fingerprints on this thing from from many months prior to j 4, 5, and 6.
Speaker 0: I wanna go back to something you said in the first sentence, which is you have seen evidence and that's for your questions to Chris Wray that there were FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters within the capital. So that is proof of entrapment because, of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the capital building. Aren't that many doors. You work there, you know. But they allowed people in on purpose to entrap them.
That's what that proves, I think. Does it not?
Speaker 1: Well, it's certainly condemning. It's another piece of the of the strategy that the that the government employed to sort of complete the entrapment of Americans that they had had, infiltrated and then prodded and provoked with online with the with the those original seeds planted of of, actions like, you know, what type of gear to wear and and and just in language that incited behavior that could go the wrong way. You know, pushing actions of of legal and legitimate peaceful protest to an edge where where those Americans would likely not have gone had they not been been, you know, encouraged by the FBI plant amongst their number that they didn't know was there. So by the time it was actually j 6 and you had you had, masses of Americans assembled outside the capitol, almost, like, 99.9%, 100% peaceful. On the inside, you had FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters that knew their way around the capitol.
Before the doors even open. Before the doors open. Or else how are you gonna get around the capitol? You've been there many times. You need a guide to get from whatever door you go in.
It's a labyrinth. It's, yeah, it's it's a maze inside there. So you that's right. So there's no way just Americans, most of which, had never been to the capitol, There's no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to the to the statuary or the house chamber or the senate chamber. It's just not possible.
So the the the FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to to specifically waive in the the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the capitol, and the doors open and they were allowed in. And on the inside were were oh, there's some more Trump supporters, but really those were FBI assets, law enforcement assets that knew their way around the capital. And they they waved those guys in, said, come on. Follow us. And they they're the ones that led them on the path directly.
Now how do you think of guys? Never been to the capital. Gotta gotta come into the capitol all amped up on on emotion and make his way straight to Nancy Pelosi's office. Come on. It's like I couldn't get to there's no way.
I've been there for 7 years. Could come in some random door at the capitol and make my way to Nashville. Everything is unmarked.
Speaker 0: I mean, those leadership offices are unmarked. So how would
Speaker 1: you know? It's confusing to get around in the capitol. Every American that has been there knows this. When you go on a tour, you bring your family to DC, you go through the capital, you have to have a guide. And and on January 6th, the guides were FBI assets, the law enforcement assets, and they were dressed as Trump supporters.
They were positioned inside the capitol prior to the doors being open so that the Americans that had assembled outside the capitol, once allowed in, could be brought directly to the areas where the FBI, the DOJ, and the deep state actors knew would be the most, the most sort of condemning criminal action of of Americans being a lot being inside the capital, protesting without permit and things. So they knew they were setting the stage for arrest and prosecution. It's such a crime. Who who planned this, do you think? I think factions planned this.
I wouldn't say who talked about it because that, yeah, I don't think there was one person that that planned this, but I believe the the faction of, establishment liberals within the FBI and the Democrat Party and our intelligence services to to another extent, use their massive powers of surveillance and, investigative, assets that they have across the country, confidential informants, registered informants, non registered informants, voluntary informants. It's a it's a complex web of of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn't take much, the faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services that would coordinate with with the most extreme liberal, factions within a Democrat party that were desperate to keep Trump out of office, and and, you know, worked within the the theater of operations, shall we say, that had been that had been set by the COVID alleged medical emergencies nationwide and millions and millions of mail in ballots. There's no daylight between the the compromised election cycle of November 2020 and ultimately what happened on on on j6. So you ask who planned this?
This would be the combination of several several of the most extreme liberal anti Trump, anti America First factions that, that were in positions of authority within our federal law enforcement organizations and the the Democrat party across the country.
Speaker 0: Can when you say that there were FBI assets in the crowd, it in the building beforehand and and certainly outside, What's the scale of this? You're talking, like, 10, 20? No.
Speaker 1: Based upon some very conservative, but, like, hard investigative effort evaluation of of the numbers from putting together eyewitnesses and and videos and, and affidavit statement, and whistleblower statements, and court records that have been revealed through individual criminal cases where j6 defendants have been prosecuted, and smart attorneys have forced, admissions by the DOJ and the FBI, but those admissions have been sealed within the parameter of that criminal case by protective order by the judge, so they I I can't share them, but I've seen them. So real hard objective and conservative, estimates would would put the number of FBI assets in the crowd outside and working inside at at well over 200. 200? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So you're in law enforcement. Yeah. Yep. Before you came to congress in the military as well, that seemed that's an extraordinary number.
Is it?
Speaker 1: Well, no. When you think about the scope of the operation, if you were gonna do this, you would need you would
Speaker 0: need that relative to so like when, I don't know, Minneapolis burned down or when Saint John's, the Episcopal Church of Carson, the White House in Lafayette Square was set ablaze, and all the secret service agents were injured. Were there 200 FBI assets in the crowd among Antifa then?
Speaker 1: I mean, I I don't know how many undercover agents FBI would have in a situation like that, but but but but j 6 was the was the was the final act prior to arrest and prosecution of of Americans that that were identified as as Trump supporters. I mean, the objective was to destroy the entire MAGA movement, to to forever stain the, the patriotic fervor that was associated with with the America First Mega Movement that had won in 2016 and we believe won again in 2020, and the the establishment on both sides, both major parties were determined to smash that out of existence, not just by defeating Trump, but by destroying the reputations of the movement itself by creating this narrative that was totally false, but was heavily pushed that mega Republicans, America First Republicans are somehow a danger to our republic and a a domestic terror threat, which is a whole another story about what the FBI has done to tagging Americans as, suspected domestic terrorists and and following us as we travel across the country. But the the bottom line is that, 200 as a I I believe is a conservative number. First of all, I think there were there's many more, But a number that I'm comfortable going on record with is that we believe that there were that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the capital, embedded into groups that entered the capital or provoked entry of the capital, and working with FBI assets that would have included Metro Police and Capitol Police that would dress as Trump supporters inside the capital because those were the guys that knew their way around the capitol.
So given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged, and the number of people that were actually outside the capital and it entered, we believe 200 is a conservative number. Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: It's it's shocking what you're saying. It confirms everyone's worst suspicions about this. It's clearly true. Did you come across any evidence that the the DOD, the military, either Defense Intelligence Agency or National Guard or any part of the US military played any role in this at all?
Speaker 1: I have not seen that. I've heard the echoes of that suspicion, and I have I have observed, circumstantial evidence that that has been presented to me, that I've that I have reviewed, but to but to me, it does not rise to the level that I would call actionable from an investigative perspective. So there's some there was some suspicion, but in in in law enforcement the thresholds you're looking across is reasonable suspicion that would prompt a criminal investigation, and then the next threshold is probable cause, which you need for arrest. And then of course in our system, finally, the last threshold is is, is conviction, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. So the I I did review evidence, Tucker, regarding some suspicions of military involvement in some way, but and I and I've I have reviewed some of that evidence that that had been that I've been able to get my hands on, and, I do not think that the the military was, was involved, not at the level, most certainly not at the level of the of the FBI and, over the course of all of 2020.
And then on j 4, 5, and 6, the FBI working in coordination with other law enforcement assets that that they roped into the operation Right. From Metro PD, from DC, and and, the Capitol Police was sort of sort of tricked into participating with the with what the FBI had been staging for, you know, 10 months. Just a bit
Speaker 0: if you take 3 steps back, this is not democracy. So the federal agencies serve under the oversight of the elected president, and then on under the oversight of the elected congress. Their elected people get to make the decisions. You have a Republican president. You now have a Republican congress, and neither one can get a straight answer from the FBI.
No no one has any control of the FBI. You're describing a government within a government.
Speaker 1: Well, in America, a question becomes reasonable men would would would ask when we face a crisis like this, who investigates the investigate? Right. And the answer in America is is congress. So we we have the responsibility to investigate through the appropriate committees, which would we're certainly we're certainly doing that now that we have a republican majority in control of the committees, but we don't have the power to arrest. We can we can give criminal referrals based upon our investigative efforts, but we have to have a DOJ that's receptive to the criminal referrals.
So we we've hit quite a a brick wall, have we not? Constitutionally, we we have the responsibility to investigate objectively, and and and anyone that knows me know that's exactly what I'm I'm pursuing. I do not have I'm not trying to create a crime to fit a narrative to blame on the FBI. I'm following the evidence, and and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level, and a and a a conspiracy within our government at the highest level to create the the, to set the stage for a compromised election cycle in 2020, and then the the the actions that took place on j 4, 5, and 6, and then the the criminal investigation, arrest, and prosecution of Americans that they were able to entrap and document with the thousands of cameras that were operating that day and use that evidence that they knew they were setting up to investigate, arrest, and prosecute the Americans that they had entrapped. So Congress can investigate these things, and we and we are, and we will reveal these horrific truths, and we will have criminal referrals.
But until you have a a a president running the executive branch that will clean house at the DOJ and FBI at the highest levels and put American patriots in place that will be that will act upon the criminal referrals that that congress provides, then none of those guys are gonna get arrested because they're not gonna arrest themselves, and we don't have arrest authority.
Speaker 0: I'm a little surprised and don't expect to be critical of your colleagues in the Republican conference, but, I mean, they do control the house. Impeachment is a thing. Chris Wray is still the FBI director. I watched Republicans, some of whom I know, cheer the murder of Ashley Babbitt who was unarmed woman less than 55, by Michael Byrd. They were Michael Byrd side, and it I have to say for a lot of Republican voters and I count myself among them.
Very clarifying. If you're cheering Ashley Babbitt's murder shooting women now, that's okay because she likes Trump. And the Republicans were like, yeah. I was happy. Like, a lot of them thought that.
What the hell?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I was and it it made me sick. Me too. You know, I'm there's a a great responsibility when you when you wear a badge in America. I mean, think about it.
To be to be the to be the designated servant of your community that has that has the the authority to, to deny the freedom of a fellow American in the land of the free. Like, that's a heavy responsibility. So the the escalation of of force is must be appropriate in order to affect a lawful arrest, and and a a bad a bad shoot is the worst thing that an officer can possibly be involved in in his in his career. It's it's, you know, we it's it's it's the thing of nightmares for for good police officers. So to take what was what was from a law enforcement perspective was clearly a bad shoot because there's some basic rules you just cannot violate.
You have to attempt to effect an arrest before you can go to deadly force. There was there was no attempt to arrest Ashley Batman. There were there were officers on the other side of the window she was climbing through. There were officers on the interior side of the window she was climbing through. There was no indication that had been that this had been going on for an hour, and there was there was no reports on the radio or anywhere else of of gunfights.
So there was no reason at that point to expect that Ashley Babin or anybody else in the in the crowd was gonna produce a firearm and start firing on police officers. Why? Because it had not happened. So that's part of the totality of circumstance that a police officer is responsible for knowing. We stay in constant communication with our radios.
We know what's going on. That officer that that that pulled that trigger would shot a a American woman who was clearly in a in like a physically compromised position climbing through the broken glass of a of a window is not, you know, it's not like she just stepped into the cage in MMA and she was ready to fight. She was climbing through a window draped in a flag. There's police officers on the other side of the window. There's police officers on the interior side of the window.
So you have plenty enough officer presence. If you wanna arrest that woman, then by all means, pull it through the window, you know, put flex cuffs on her and throw her in the corner. We'll get to you later, ma'am. We're kinda busy right now. That's what you do.
You'd have grabbed that woman and pulled her through the and threw her in the corner, or handed her back to somebody that could pull her back, you know, from that front line right there. So understand that very well, I understand officers have to make split second decisions, but you never you never make a decision to use lethal force unless it's absolutely called for and required, if you're losing a fight attempting to effect an arrest, then then, yeah, if if there's if if the officer's life is in danger and he's all by himself, but there's never should be a circumstance where you just pull the trigger and a woman climbing through a window that's clearly unarmed. There's no evidence of gunplay from the crowd that she's coming from. You got officers on both side of where she is. If you gotta arrest her, then by all means, arrest her.
You know, to put flex cups on her and and move on. So, you know, she'd nannle the next person trying to come through the window, but she don't shoot her. So that was a
Speaker 0: bad issue. An invest a reveal investigation. Was cheered.
Speaker 1: Yep. Why do you think that was? And there's this in there's this insanity that has taken hold in the in the the minds and hearts of many otherwise reasonable American citizens where they did they they hate Trump so much. Like, they're they're so deeply embedded, and they're they've sold their souls to the establishment that when we had an America first president and and he and he, like, stopped the, the military industrial complex forward momentum and and he and he began restoring power to individual members of congress and restoring individual rights and freedoms and sovereignty of the state, and he took away the actions of the cartels and and brought this this real common sense approach to the executive branch and was leading our country in that beautiful direction. This was interfering with the business model of the establishment.
So many career politicians on both sides of the aisle, and I, you know, I don't like those guys, man. I'm not one of them. And I I served my country in congress, but, I I don't consider myself a politician by any means. I'm a servant to We The People. Some of these guys, man, they pop out of the womb to be to be politicians.
They get groomed their whole life, you know, to be a a career politician. And those are the ones that had this instinctive cheer for something really bad happening to a Trump supporter. You know, they their true color showed in that moment and was an ugly color. Yeah. That's it.
Speaker 0: We shouldn't be shooting women, number 1. I couldn't agree more. So where where does this go from here? You have this corpus of information. It sounds like it's definitive.
When does the public see the detail, and what's the process after that?
Speaker 1: It's a good question. So evidence from criminal investigations by nature is rather secretive, but there is a, a tremendous compilation of data that I think should be made completely available to the public, and that's the digital files from from j 4, 5, and 6. This is where, speaker Mike Johnson can be a champion for for that will be remembered for throughout history as the speaker of the house that fully released unredacted, digital files from j 4, 5, and 6 completely to the American people. And within that data, there is full truth, and and the American people, it is the only staff large enough to, you know, frame by frame, go through 80,000 hours of digital evidence. Nobody has a staff big enough to do that, but we can crowdsource it to the American people.
So you ask when will this evidence be released? I'd I've I've been encouraging speaker Johnson, as I did speaker McCarthy, to, my god, man, release this data to the American people.
Speaker 0: Why won't why won't they?
Speaker 1: I believe speaker Johnson will, but but Mike is a is is quite a skilled constitutionalist attorney himself, and he's a very measured, patient, faithful man. So, I have I extend trust to to speaker Johnson when he says that it's his intention to fully release the the call the j6 tapes, but really it's digital evidence, it's more than it's more than just video evidence, it's it's a lot. You know, radio transcripts, the whole thing. I I believe my speaker Johnson knows that this is a significant, duty that he must he he he must perform for the American people. It's a moment in history where where, you know, I believe our lord and savior has placed him in that in that position of service to the country, and he has a responsibility to to fully release that data.
And then the American people will see for themselves what some of us have already learned to our horror to be true.
Speaker 0: Congressman Hinggens, thank you very much. Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not commit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
How about that, on Jan 6 there is a Video of Police Officers dressed in Uniform going into a room at the Capitol and coming out dressed as Trump Supporters. The Capitol is hard to Navigate unless someone showed them! https://t.co/mXZTuXvT1H
Video Transcript AI Summary
Specific observations indicate police officers and Capitol Police entered rooms in uniform and emerged as Trump supporters and construction workers. This raises questions about why video evidence hasn't been released.
Navigating the Capitol's maze-like layout requires extensive familiarity. Trump supporters leading the way inside the Capitol before doors opened likely coordinated with FBI agents and assets embedded in the crowd, possibly for months. The speaker believes the American people deserve to know this truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Specific observations of police officers, Capitol Police, or Metro, both entering rooms and here in the Capitol in uniform and coming out as Trump supporters and construction workers. So You've seen that? Yeah. So Why has that video not been released yet? One would say that's a pretty good clue.
Yeah. The the other reason that we believe is just practical to have someone that knows how to get around. I mean, you know yourself. You can't walk around this place and know where you're going. You have to be here for years and years.
Is a maze. That's right. And it's incredibly difficult to get around. You have to know where you're going. So you had to have people that that were very familiar with the the capital itself in order to lead some random groups of citizens that have come from every corner of the country.
In many cases, been to DC before, much less walked around in the capital. So it it just makes sense that the Trump supporters that were leading the way and were clearly already inside the capital before the doors were open were working in coordination with the FBI agents and assets that were embedded into the crowd. In some cases, in these groups had been embedded for months. This is ugly stuff we're discussing, but the American people deserve to know the truth, and I intend to see that it happens. Evidence, specific observation.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Tucker Carlson says the Chief of the Police at the Capitol told him in an interview that the crowd on J6 was FILLED with federal agents. Fox News took Tucker off the air before the interview was released. https://t.co/YDvAXp4NgB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a shift in perspective about January 6, recounting that he did not initially suspect U.S. law enforcement or military involvement or a false flag. He notes an interview with Capitol Police Chief Stephen Sund, who he says stated that “that guy was filled with federal agents,” a claim Sund would know from being in charge of security. He observes that, two and a half years later, core claims about January 6 appear to be lies, arguing that when someone is caught lying about one thing, it prompts questions about what else they are lying about.
The speaker emphasizes he is not a conspiracist and grew up in a country with low belief in obvious conspiracies, but he asserts that “the amount of lying around January 6” is distressing and that anyone covering for those lies should be ashamed, including portions of the American media and Fox News. He acknowledges Fox News allowed him to air material, for which he expresses gratitude, but notes that some people there were angry at him for doing so and challenges critics to point out cherry-picking or miscontextualization.
He clarifies that he did not claim the events were entirely peaceful; police officers were injured, recognizing that injuries occurred in other protests as well. He emphasizes that his point is to ask obvious questions and scrutinize the narrative. He discusses Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, noting that surveillance footage had been hidden until he aired it, showing Capitol Police attempting doors and escorting Chansley into the Senate chamber, where he wandered and offered a prayer thanking the Capitol Police, before leaving. He argues there are many conclusions one could draw from this footage, but asserts that Chansley cannot be called an insurrectionist, labeling that designation a lie. He defines insurrection as a very specific meaning and remains pedantic about words, insisting the incident was not an insurrection, not armed, and not intended to overthrow the government but a “spasm of rage” that Trump helped inspire.
Regarding the election, he states he does not support leaders inciting anger, but asserts the event was not an insurrection. He condemns the prosecution of Chansley, a Navy veteran and American citizen, who was imprisoned for years after being let into the Senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Police, and he rejects the portrayal of Chansley as an insurrectionist. He condemns the lack of remorse in those who cover up or excuse what he views as lies, and quotes anger at the idea of imprisoning someone for something he believes was misrepresented.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know it's infected when it hurts. You press it. You recoil. They immediately recoiled when you asked any questions about January 6. And that was a tip-off to me.
I mean, I had no thought in my head as I watched this happen on television and in the subsequent weeks that US law enforcement or military agencies had anything to do with it. That never crossed my mind. I never thought there was it was a false flag or anything like that. I'm not a conspiracist by temperament. I never thought that.
And then I interviewed the chief of the Capitol Police, Stephen Sund, in an interview that was never aired on Fox, by the way. I was fired before it could air. I I'm gonna interview him again. But Stephen Sund was the totally nonpolitical, worked for Nancy Pelosi. I mean, this was not some right wing activist.
He was the chief of the Capitol Police on January 6. And he said, oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That guy was filled with federal agents.
What? Yes. Well, he would know, of course, because he was in charge of security at the site. So, the more time has passed now it's been two and a half years it becomes really obvious that core claims they made about January 6 were lies. And my view about events and about people is if you catch someone telling a lie about one thing, the first question you have is what else are you lying about?
If you say to your wife, where were you? I was at the grocery store. If you find out she was not at the grocery store, then it raises Probably not just lying about being at the grocery store, were you? Like, what is this exactly? Why were you lying about that?
And that's kind of the way I feel about January. Like, what is this? What this is they're clearly lying. That's provable. Why?
And, you know, I'm the last person. I'm often accused of being a conspiracy nut. I'm the opposite. I grew up in a very stable country, The United States, the '70s and '80s, where people didn't indulge in conspiracies because there weren't any obvious ones afoot. Right?
I mean, we took things at face value. We trusted our government by and large. But I the amount of lying around January 6, and it was obvious in the tapes that I showed, is really distressing. And anyone who's covering for those lies should be ashamed of himself. And that would include almost the entire American media, including Fox News.
People at Fox News. Fox News, to its great credit, let me air that. And I'm grateful that they did. But there, you know, there are people there who were mad at me for airing that. Really?
Why? If if you think I'm cherry picking it and taking it out of context, show me show me where. And by the way, I didn't make the claim that it was entirely peaceful. It it wasn't. Police officers were injured.
More police officers were injured at the riots in front of the White House the year before, but whatever. All injuries to police officers or anyone else are bad. I'm not certainly not making excuses for it, but I'm asking obvious questions. You said this happened. For example, there was a guy called the QAnon shaman, Jacob Chansley.
They put the guy in prison for years. There is surveillance tape that they hid until I aired it showing the Capitol Police trying lots of doors, trying to get into the senate chamber, the sacrosanct chamber that he wasn't allowed to be in, and then escorting him in. And he kind of wanders around like he's taken a hit of mescaline, just kind of you know what I mean? And, like, he says a prayer. He thanks God for the Capitol Police, and then he wanders out.
Now there are a lot of conclusions you could draw from that, but you cannot call that guy an insurrectionist. That's a lie. And by the way, an insurrection is a very specific meaning, and I'm pedantic about words because they're the currency that I trade in. I mean, that's what I do. I use words for a living, so I care about their specific meanings.
That was not an insurrection. It was not armed. And its purpose was not to overthrow the government. It was it was a spasm of rage that Trump definitely it helped inspire. That's true.
And, at the election results. Okay. You know? I I'm not actually for that. I don't think leaders should be making people more pissed in general.
But that's what it was. It was not an insurrection. And to put Jacob Chansley, an American citizen, a navy veteran, in jail for years after he was let into the Senate chamber by uniformed Capitol Hill police officers, and then I play that and I'm the bad guy? Fuck you. Like, what what do you make of that?
I'm sorry. It makes me mad just thinking about it. I said I wasn't gonna be a hater. That makes me mad. And I see people on other channels.
It's outrageous. He's trying to minimize January 6. Well, but what this guy went to prison. Went to prison. You ever been to prison?
Only for visits. Right. Okay. It's not very nice. Don't wanna go to prison to take a man's freedom away and call him all these names for something he didn't do and then show no remorse at all when you're exposed to have lied about it as a human being who was locked away in a prison.
It's an outrage to me.