reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 1:57 AM

@TrumpWarRoom - Trump War Room

WATCH: @seanhannity highlights how the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th were preplanned. "If it was planned in advance no argument can be made that [President Trump] in anyway through his words was responsible for what they had preplanned." https://t.co/aSVZmaB0N7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democrats' snap impeachment of the president is complete with hysteria and hypocrisy. They didn't gather evidence or allow due process, and now they're short on facts. They claim the president incited an insurrection with his January 6th remarks, but major media outlets, the FBI, court documents, and even AOC confirm the Capitol breach was pre-planned by violent agitators. Reports show the FBI warned of a potential "war at the Capitol" beforehand, contradicting claims of no prior indication of violence. The Capitol Police Chief requested the National Guard multiple times, but his pleas were rejected. The federal government needs to investigate why the Capitol Police were unprepared and why Pelosi didn't have the sergeant of arms prepare. We need a nine eleven style commission to investigate this so it never happens again. If the riot was planned in advance, the argument that Trump incited the insurrection is invalid.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is, well, we'll call it sewer swamp theater. Now it's complete with hysteria, hyperbole, and of course, well, rank hypocrisy. Now it caused the Democrats conducted the snap impeachment in the house without taking the time to gather evidence, build a case, allow for due process or a defense or even a rudimentary investigation, they are now short on something called facts. This is why you don't rush to judgment. That's why we have due process. That's why a snap impeachment is so dangerous to this country. They claim the president incited an insurrection, their new favorite word, because of his insightful remarks on January 6. But now, according to every major media outlet and the FBI and court documents and even AOC. Yeah. The capital breach was we now know predetermined, pre planned. It was plotting, planning, scheming by violent agitators while way before the president ever spoke at the rally, days, weeks before. How do I know? The mob and the media even has to admit it. Take a look. Speaker 1: The investigation into the deadly insurrection at The US Capitol A Week ago had new evidence that it was planned. Speaker 2: Also shocking, new reporting that the FBI received a very specific warning before the riot. Speaker 1: That FBI notice warned of war at the Capitol, but for some reason, security wasn't stepped up there to meet the challenge that that attack would pose. FBI admitting that it had intelligence before the insurrection, that people were planning to travel to DC with the intent to cause violence. Speaker 3: One week before the week prior to the insurrection, I started to get text messages that I needed to be careful, and that in particular, I needed to be careful about the sixth. Speaker 0: Now according to Forbes, quote, the capital attack was planned openly online for weeks, and police, law enforcement, they still weren't ready. Washington Post, the FBI report warned of, quote, war at the Capitol, contradicting claims that there was no indication of any looming violence. And even the New York Times, FBI warned of violence before the siege. This is why the Capitol Police Chief actually requested the National Guard before, during, and after. He as a matter of fact, he made six separate appeals for help, but his pleas for help were rejected every single time. In fact, according to Trump chief of staff, Mark Meadows, he was on with our own Maria Bartiromo over the weekend. The president was very vocal about offering security assistance prior to the sixth and even ordered 10,000 national guard troops to stand ready, but they were never called on even when the chief of police of the capital was calling them until, of course, it was too late. The federal government has a duty to figure out exactly what went wrong here, why those capital police were left out to dry, why didn't Pelosi have the sergeant of arms prepare, when are we gonna discuss her dereliction of duty and failure to protect the capital? By the way, that's your capital. We the people, that's our capital. Those are our elected official officials. This transcends any politics in my mind. Doesn't matter. Whoever's elected needs to be protected. Period. End of sentence. So that's why I've been saying we need a nine eleven style commission to investigate and give us a full report and put in changes so this never happens again. Well, not the snap impeachment of a former president. That directly impacts the argument, by the way, that president Trump's rally speech was responsible for inciting the insurrection. If it was planned in advance, no argument can be made that the president in any way through his words was responsible for what they had pre planned, unless he was part of the planning. And, of course, nobody's making that allegation because that never happened. So now the entire impeachment shift shows charade and the charge is dead in the water. Democrats now are left arguing that president Trump told
Saved - October 18, 2023 at 8:25 AM

@johncardillo - John Cardillo

Never forget that it was FBI asset Ray Epps ordering people into the Capitol. The entire thing was a set up from the jump. https://t.co/6zF2ECVFkr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their intention to go to the Capitol, despite the potential consequences. They emphasize the need to enter the Capitol building multiple times.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know. In fact, tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. We need to go in to the capitol. Let's go. No. I'm gonna put it out there. I'm probably gotta go to jail for a jail tomorrow. We need to go into the capitol. Into the capitol. The capital's
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 8:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6, 2021, the US witnessed a significant event that some consider the most dangerous insurrection in American history. The involvement of 20 FBI and ATF agents raised questions about the political persecution of American citizens. Whistleblower revelations, including documents and text messages, shed light on the Proud Boys' intentions to protect Trump supporters from Antifa violence. The FBI's handling of the situation, including the detainment of individuals based on provided evidence, has sparked controversy. The media's portrayal of Trump and his supporters, along with the alleged hiding of evidence, has raised concerns about the authenticity of election integrity. The lack of prosecution in certain cases and the labeling of conservatives as insurrectionists have further fueled these concerns. The FBI's actions and the suppression of conservative voices have led to questions about the freedom of expression in the nation. The article also highlights the rejection of cases related to election fraud and the vilification of those who questioned the narrative. The article concludes by mentioning the protests in Georgia and the confrontational nature of the Capitol incident, with evidence suggesting organized elements and the presence of Antifa members. The narrative set by the media has shaped public perception, despite contradicting facts. (498 characters)

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

𝐓𝐇𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃: Proof That January 6, 2021 Was The Most Dangerous Insurrection In American History.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

20 FBI and ATF join J6th. The FBI and the Department of Injustice continue to politically persecute and frighten American citizens A whistleblower revealed a plethora of documents and text messages, some labeled "Highly Sensitive," to the Gateway Pundit. https://www.dropbox.com/s/mdcr198jrp4t320/FED%20attached%20to%20Proud%20Boys.pdf?dl=0

FED attached to Proud Boys.pdf Dropbox is a free service that lets you bring your photos, docs, and videos anywhere and share them easily. Never email yourself a file again! dropbox.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The informant further testifies to the FBI that Proud Boys intended to travel to Washington DC to risk their own safety to shield normal Trump Supporters from Antifa violence so MAGA people could enjoy the day and "go back to their hotels safely"

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Throughout the day, the informant sent SMS to his handlers. The whistleblower provided us with text message correspondence between the informant on January 6th, such as the one below. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217.84.0.pdf

Motion to dismiss count(s) – #84 in United States v. RHODES, III (D.D.C., 1:22-cr-00015) – CourtListener.com MOTION to Dismiss Count 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Indictment by THOMAS EDWARD CALDWELL. (Fischer, David) (Entered: 04/12/2022) courtlistener.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The photographs and videos he gave, together with names, addresses, and phone numbers, led to these people being searched and detained by the FBI. See the photos labelled "Highly Sensitive" submitted to the FBI and that the whistleblower shared HERE. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6my1w5w3uu0gt72/AADzN1WqfpYpO5v2ni8rJP20a?dl=0&preview=IMAGES+OF+DEFENDANTS.pdf

Dropbox - Error Dropbox is a free service that lets you bring your photos, docs, and videos anywhere and share them easily. Never email yourself a file again! dropbox.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

When an event like J6 gains the public's attention, someone has to be the enemy, the FBI knew this. If the people fighting for election integrity are bad who is good? Full audio, images, and transcript below: CC: @GOP https://www.scribd.com/document/582084718/Highly-Sensitive-DOJ-Jan-6-Documents-Leaked-to-The-Gateway-Pundit-FBI-Confidential-Human-Source-INFILTRATED-Proud-Boys-Ran-FBI-Operation-on-J-6-R

Highly Sensitive DOJ Jan 6. Documents Leaked To The Gateway Pundit - FBI Confidential Human Source INFILTRATED Proud Boys, Ran FBI Operation On J-6, Reported They Were INNOCENT! | PDF | Crime & Violence | Law Enforcement Highly Sensitive DOJ Jan 6. Documents Leaked to The Gateway Pundit – FBI Confidential Human Source INFILTRATED Proud Boys, Ran FBI Operation on J-6, Reported They Were INNOCENT! - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Highly Sensitive DOJ Jan 6. Documents Leaked to The Gateway Pundit – FBI Confidential Human Source INFILTRATED Proud Boys, Ran FBI Operation on J-6, Reported They Were INNOCENT! scribd.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The media pushed the propaganda that Trump and his supporters were asking everyone to riot. The J6 committee was caught doctoring Trump's speech and removed "peacefully and patriotically" from it. Why would they hide this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I demand that Congress only counts the lawfully slated electors. We will peacefully march to the Capitol to make our voices heard. Today will determine if Republicans stand for election integrity and for us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Come to demand that congress do the right thing and only count the electors who have been lawfully slated, lawfully slated. I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Today, we will see whether Republicans stand strong for integrity of our elections, but whether or not they stand strong for our

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Trump actually vanished before his voters began walking towards the Capitol, he was "escorted" by his secret service because they claim there were reports that indicated he was in danger, the media continued to paint a false picture of Trump, but why? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/29/secret-service-agent-testify-trump-wheel-jan-6

Secret Service agent reportedly willing to testify Trump did not lunge at him Row comes after ex-White House aide’s explosive testimony that portrayed a violent and unhinged Trump on day of Capitol attack theguardian.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Alex Jones was also accused of inciting violence, Did you know that "2000 Mules" has yet to be debunked? Why would the FBI and DOJ hide evidence from the public? Why would they want to frame MAGA voters?

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to avoid confrontation with the police and make sure this doesn't become a big story. Let's peacefully march to the other side of the stage where we can speak and occupy. Please spread the word and tell everyone to join us on the other side. We don't want any violence like what happened at Kent State. We're here to save the republic. Thank you and please march to the other side.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over this. We need to not have the confrontation with the police. They're gonna make this a story. I'm gonna march to the other side of the other stage where we can speak and occupy peacefully. To everybody behind you, march to the other side. Throwing such things. We don't wanna have a Kent State here. So I love you. We're saving the republic. That is beautiful. But please tell everyone you know, march to the other side.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

We have proof that prosecutors and the FBI hid footage, so I have attached every Parler file from J6th, The people should always have the ability to judge for themselves. https://projects.propublica.org/parler-capitol-videos/ when the truth is hidden from the public a lie can take it's place

What Parler Saw During the Attack on the Capitol ProPublica sifted through thousands of videos taken by Parler users to create an immersive, first-person view of the Capitol riot as experienced by those who were there. projects.propublica.org

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

If this looks like an insurrection to you?, please research the 1987–1989 JVP insurrection. - Federal court filings reveal over 20 FBI agents were embedded in the #January6 crowd https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217.84.0.pdf CC:@kevinomccarthy CC:@SpeakerMcCarthy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out that the chair belongs to the vice president of the United States, even though he is not present. They emphasize the importance of not being disrespectful and remind everyone that information is valuable. The speaker acknowledges the camaraderie among the group and expresses the need to act in a more respectful manner. They conclude by stating that they should strive for better behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It belongs to the vice president of the United States. Yeah. But he's in here. It's not our chair. Look. I love you guys. You're brothers. We can't be disrespectful. Information. Information is the race. You can't do it. No. This is our chair. I agree with you, brother, but it's not ours. It belongs to the vice president of the United States, but he's in here. It's not our chair. Look, I love you guys. You're brothers. We can't be disrespectful. It. I owe war. Better than that.
Motion to dismiss count(s) – #84 in United States v. RHODES, III (D.D.C., 1:22-cr-00015) – CourtListener.com MOTION to Dismiss Count 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Indictment by THOMAS EDWARD CALDWELL. (Fischer, David) (Entered: 04/12/2022) courtlistener.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The only people that died during this was MAGA voters like Ashli Babbitt who was shot unarmed by Capitol police. It is worth noting that there appears to be video evidence that suggests Babbitt struck the officer first, if true, this could explain the lack of prosecution.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

This new Trumpian Empire's vanguard lacked weaponry, siege equipment, food and water for a long occupation, and any firm plan. What did they possess? A man in warpaint who claimed to be a shaman. (Who I can confirm from close sources is a freedom-loving patriot not FBI)

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

With a distraction this large, it wouldn't be insane to question the authenticity of election integrity. After conservatives were labeled as insurrectionists, all of their views and concerns became irrelevant. Anyone who would hold them accountable was identified as a terrorist.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Why would the FBI go through all of this work to discredit Trump? Evidence suggests it was to make America forget why they came. When Trump won his 2016 election millions of tax dollars were spent when the DNC accused him of "Russian collusion" https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS | Federal Bureau of Investigation CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING fbi.gov

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The fact that the media and the FBI prevented conservatives from being able to voice the same concerns is very concerning in itself. If we live in a nation where only one voice is able to be concerned is it still free? Why did MAGA voters go to D.C.?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican members of the electoral college, we urge you to vote your conscience on December 19th. The electoral college was created to prevent an unfit candidate from becoming president. You have the power to shape the future of our nation by selecting a qualified candidate. We are not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton, but for someone you consider especially competent. By doing so, you can give the House of Representatives the option to choose a qualified candidate. We stand with you in support and solidarity with all citizens of the United States. Your voice speaks for us all, and you have the opportunity to go down in history as an American hero. Thank you for your patriotism and service to the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republican members of the electoral college, this message is for you. As you know, our founding fathers built the electoral college to safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone who is, to an imminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Speaker 1: An imminent degree. Someone who is highly qualified for the job. Speaker 0: The electoral college was created specifically to prevent an unfit candidate from becoming president. Speaker 2: There are 538 members of the electoral college. You and just 36 other conscientious republican electors could make a difference. Speaker 1: By voting your conscience on December 19th. Speaker 0: And thereby shaping the future of our nation. Speaker 1: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. Speaker 2: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. Speaker 3: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. Speaker 2: As you know, the constitution gives electors the right to vote for any eligible person. Speaker 0: Any eligible person no matter which party they belong to. Speaker 1: But it should certainly be someone you consider especially competent Speaker 0: Especially competent to serve as president of the United States of America. Speaker 2: By voting your conscience, you and other brave Republican electors And give the house of representatives the option to select a qualified candidate for the presidency. I stand with you. Speaker 0: I stand with you. I stand with you. I stand with you in support and solidarity with conservatives, independents, And liberals. And all citizens of the United States. Speaker 3: The American people trust that your voice speaks for us all. Speaker 1: And that you you will make Yourself heard through the constitutional responsibility granted to you by Alexander Hamilton himself. Speaker 2: What is evident is that Donald Trump lacks more than the qualifications to be president. Speaker 1: He lacks the necessary stability. Speaker 0: And clearly, the respect for the constitution of our great nation. Speaker 2: You have the position Speaker 0: The authority and the opportunity to go down in the books as an American hero. Speaker 2: Who changed the course of history. And you have my respect. You have my respect. You have my respect. Speaker 0: For your patriotism. And service to the American people.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

An army of lawyers descended, some with poorly written briefs, others with very convincing witnesses. Postal workers, a UPS driver, poll workers, & others began sharing damning stories about blatant fraud. Each of these cases was slowly, but soundly rejected, denied, or dismissed

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video presents evidence of alleged widespread fraud in the November 2020 US election. It highlights statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, where Joe Biden received major vote spikes in the early hours of November 4th. These spikes occurred during a 5-hour window when counting had reportedly stopped. The video also discusses eyewitness and video evidence, including a poll worker in Georgia who was seen handling absentee ballots after counting was supposed to have ended. It raises concerns about Dominion Voting Systems and their alleged vulnerabilities to hacking and manipulation. The video concludes by urging viewers to share the evidence and demand election reform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No matter which side of the fence people have been on, they've been saying, Show me the evidence. I'll believe it when I see the evidence. And people on both sides agree that something went terribly wrong in November 2020. But there really has been no comprehensive place to see the evidence of widespread fraud Until now. This video is pure data, so don't get mad. You can't be angry when a scientist confirms the gravity pulls downward at negative 9.8 meters per second squared, even when that fact works against the narrative you've heard. So here we go. Just before we show you some new disturbing video evidence, we'll talk about statistical anomalies in 3 states In question, in the early hours of November 4, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major boat spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia suddenly placing him in the lead when he had been trailing Trump by a significant margin. 8,954 individual vote updates were analyzed. Across nearly all updates, there follows a clear statistical pattern. However, a very small number of batches are especially questionable. The 4 most notable aberrations were 2 in Michigan, 1 in Wisconsin and 1 in Georgia. And all occurred in the same 5 hour window in the middle of the night when in some places, Counting reportedly had stopped. Not only do these updates not follow generally observed patterns, but their behavior is particularly extreme. For context, using public available data from the New York Times. Here is a visualization of the number of votes I candidate in Michigan from the beginning of the election 9 to 7 PM Eastern Time on November 4th, Trump is in red, Biden is in blue. Notice the sudden and improbable spike in votes for Biden at 6:30 AM where Biden received a 141,258 votes While Trump only received 5,968, this extreme ratio is surrounded by updates that are nearly the same in ratio. This particular update is 23 times more votes for Biden and is the most extreme update favoring Biden in all datasets across all states. The situation Washington is even more stark. A single update to the vote count brought Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. Thirdly, a vote update in Georgia at 1:34 a. Eastern time on November 4th, which shows a 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and only 29,115 for Donald Trump. The extent of these 4 votes spikes in question are more than the margin of victory in all 3 states, which means the spikes were not only Normally in regards to percentage for Joe Biden, but also in magnitude of the vote count. Out of roughly 9,000 updates, this election was decided by only Four extreme updates each with a probability of less than 1 tenth of 1%. Meaning that had these 4 unlikely updates not happen, We would have a different president in the White House. Detractors argue that these spikes were merely human error and not indication of fraud And the errors have been corrected. If the errors have been corrected, where is their evidence? Why were the results never changed? Others have said that the spikes indicate heavily Democratic precincts. If that's the case, then California will show many spikes of that magnitude but it doesn't. Only 1 vote update in California is anomalous in percentage of Biden votes, but not enough magnitude to shift an outcome. The strangest anomaly visible in the data is Instantly identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which is theoretically impossible. Here is Florida. These updates occurred over a Speak following the election. Notice all the ratios of Biden to Trump votes are a 100% identical over several days. This pattern shows up in many states. It appears that a computer algorithm is involved in the process which is doing something called weighted race distribution. A feature of Diebold voting machines known as early as 2001 which gives values to votes rather than simply counting them. Here in California, we see an update of 1 vote. About 65% of that value is given to Biden and thirty two percent to Trump. How can 1 vote go to more than 1 person? It is well known and not disputed that Diebold's software was found to be pushing votes through programming in past elections. Even though Diebold is no longer used, Dominion Voting Systems acquired ES and S in 2010, which had previously Wired Diebold under its new name of Premier Election Solutions. This does not exhaust all statistical data anomalies encountered in the 2020 election, But data anomalies is only one factor to consider. Next is eyewitness and video evidence. In Georgia, there's a case of a poll worker named Ruby who was Seen on Instagram giving a secretive live video of her working in the back room filled with absentee ballots. At 10:30 p. M. On November 3rd, all media and poll watchers were told to leave State Farm Arena because ballot counting was going to stop. But Ruby and her daughter and 3 others remain behind at the State Farm arena. They pulled boxes of ballots out from under the table that was placed there in the morning and distributed them to several counting stations. Speaker 1: Back to Fulton County, Georgia right now, where our reporter Blaine Alexander apparently has some new reporting on the expectations for that count. Speaker 2: Oh, Rachel, we've learned that the counting continues tonight. You know, right here in State Farm Arena behind me, we've learned that there are 5 people who are still inside, still working to scan those absentee ballots and try and get those numbers tabulated. Now initially, we believe we were told that everybody went home at about 10:30, but I just got off the phone with the county spokesperson who tells me that indeed there are still some people in there quite literally burning the midnight oil, scanning ballot after ballot and trying to get That Speaker 1: information in. And, Blaine, specifically, you said 5 people are inside that building. That's 5 of 5 actual individuals who are working on all the absentees in Fulton County right now, just 5. Wow. Talk about Having that sort of fate of the nation in your hands. Speaker 0: Ruby is seen here in this video running the exact same stack of ballots to the machine three times. Other workers do the same. Note that a large surge in Biden votes can be observed after this tabulation at 06:34 Greenwich Mean Time, which is 1:34 AM in Georgia just after the time in question. You may ask, can a ballot really be counted more than once? Here is your answer from Coffee County, Georgia. Speaker 1: Can you stand a ballot more than once? I've just done it. I'm telling about it. The same batch that you've been doing? Speaker 0: Yeah. Just keep scanning you. Speaker 1: I just kept It's kinda the same. I just scanned the same batches that y'all just voted. Mhmm. I never got any more until that one. Nobody approves such a system. Speaker 0: Ruby allegedly posted this later on social media. Of course, the mainstream media calls this misinformation and most references to these videos have been deleted Internet search results. Apple News, the morning of the election, sent out a push message to Apple News subscribers that elections are secure. So if it's true that election fraud is rare, about Raquel Rodriguez? She was recently arrested for election fraud in Texas because of overwhelming video evidence incriminating herself that She was harvesting ballots for pay. We just Speaker 3: have the ticket ticket votes for here Biden. How many votes you think you can deliver for us? Speaker 1: At least five thousand. Speaker 3: And what do we look here as far as how much that's gonna cost? Speaker 1: For the entire team that I'm looking at, I'm looking at 55 Thousand. Speaker 3: So $55,000 or 5,000 votes pop the ticket either by Speaker 1: If not more, I'm I'm not gonna overpromise because remember, we we're we're 16 days till election day. You can give me cash. You can Speaker 3: do whatever What do you do? $55,000 upfront. $5,000. That's right. Speaker 0: Then there is cybersecurity evidence and the question of whether Dominion Voting Machines were tampered with over Internet connections. Signed affidavits under oath from cybersecurity experts indicate that Dominion Voter Systems and Edison Research were using an unencrypted crypted VPN with login credentials that were easily accessible and used by foreign adversaries to monitor and manipulate boats. The IP addresses into the Edison Research Hook Service went both directions. Meaning that not only were China and Iran and other countries accessing the servers, but also Edison Research was communicating back to these adversaries. The claims that Dominion Voting machines were not connected to the Internet are completely false. Cybersecurity experts have followed the communication of the data from Dominion Voting Servers and Edison Research to foreign countries. A simple web search will uncover that dominionvotingsystems.com is registered to a company in Hunan, China. 3 of the 7 board members of UBS Securities These are Chinese nationals. That company owns Stable Street Capital, which in turn owns Dominion. On top of that, the Dominion software is licensed from Smartmatic, which is a Venezuelan owned and controlled company. And we're all familiar with how their elections go. Furthermore, forensic audits of the machines reveal significant errors. Although the mainstream media and politicians are saying that it's dangerous misinformation that Dominion Voting Systems are unsecure, this was the very message that several left leaning news sources were claiming less than In a year ago, NBC News and PBS found out just how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes. It's Speaker 4: important to know that Georgia just spent over a100 or is about spent over $100,000,000 on a contract with Dominion to provide image cast hardware to the state in time for the twenty, for the for the next primaries and for the 2020 election. And yet here these kids were who had opened it up. They said, look. You can pop the front off of it, And here's a port you can get into right here that's easy, you know, all kinds of stuff that you could certainly do within 6 minutes behind a curtain, much less if you had extra time because any of these were connected to the web as we've discovered a couple days before, so many of them are. Speaker 0: Despite opposition and attacks, Election security experts were able to audit Dominion Voting Machines in Antrim County, Michigan, revealing unusually high error and adjudication rates. What does that mean? According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. Ballot errors are sent to adjudication, which means the vote can be decided by an election worker where there is no oversight, no transparency and no audit Trail. We've scanned a 113,130 as of moments ago. We've adjudicated a 106 Thousand possible. Experts identified an error rate of 68.05% which is far above the Federal Election Commission guidelines of 0.0008% or 1 in 250,000. Although vote adjudication logs are available for prior election years, suspiciously all the logs for the Twenty cycle were missing. Moreover, all security logs prior to 11:03 p. M. On November 4th are also missing. If that's not enough, the election event designer log shows that the Dominion Image cast precinct cards were reprogrammed on October 23rd and again on November 5th, which violates the Help America Vote Act which includes is a 90 day safe harbor period that prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware and software updates without undergoing Verification. Even if skeptics and critics persist that these issues are inconsequential, they should be willing for forensic audits to take place for transparency. Yet they have viciously attacked attempts to review logs. Why is that if there's nothing to hide? Election officials in Maricopa County, Arizona have even ignored subpoenas for release of election data and Dominion Machine audits until after the inauguration. Then there's the mass influx of unsolicited mail in ballots. The key word is unsolicited. In other words, people receiving ballots they never asked Politicians use the coronavirus to push mass mail in ballots and extending the time to receive those ballots till many days after the election. There are many reports of people who voted in person also receiving multiple unsolicited ballots in the mail. People who did not send in a mail in ballot denied in person voting because they were told they had voted Already by mail when they hadn't. This opened up chaos in the system and uncertainty as to who actually voted. Additionally, signature verification Firements were slackened in many states adding even more uncertainty. In fact, the Pennsylvania secretary of state unilaterally removed the legislative signature requirements for mailing ballots. More than a 1000 signed affidavits have been given by poll workers who have witnessed illegal activities, These non equal treatment of Republican poll watchers, counting ballots in locations with no poll watchers, poll watchers not permitted close enough to see the counting process, shredding ballots, Garbage bags full of ballots for Trump. Entire boxes of hundreds of supposedly mail in ballots that have no folds indicating they were never actually mailed by anyone. The list goes on and on. These affidavits are signed by witnesses under penalty of perjury. So this should not have been taken lightly But these witnesses were never heard in court. Unfortunately, what we have covered is only the tip of the iceberg on fraud, cover ups, federal election law violations, and dishonesty see on a global scale. Speaker 1: So either the secretary of state's office is recording and certifying results that have negative Errors and fraudulent votes in them or someone is giving them negative information. Speaker 0: Recent polls show an overwhelming percentage of the US don't trust the 20 Tony election was without fraud. At the end of this video, the credits will be further data scrolling through that you can read for yourself and pause and go back and read again. So what can you do? Firstly, find a way to download this video and share it. Film it with your mobile phone. Do anything to duplicate this. Post it with a hashtag, here is the evidence, hashtag every legal Vote. Because guaranteed, the big tech and social media giants will do their best to erase it from the internet as they've already done with much of the evidence we've already shared. And if they can't erase it, they'll Fake fact check it. Well, guess what? We've already done the fact checking. We've gone through thousands of pages of data, sworn affidavits, forensic reports in Cybersecurity reports. Secondly, you can demand election reform from your election state and local officials. We cannot let another election ever be this questionable ever again. This is the United States of America. People used to look to us on how to have democracy through our voting system. 2020 was a complete sham and it cannot ever Then Speaker 3: again.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Most importantly, not on merit, but on standing. That is, the evidence was never judged; only the method was. This ensured that Trump's followers' issues were never examined, aired, or scrutinized in the open while his opponents might insult Trump supporters for their losses

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

He did a huge disservice by never putting these claims to rest. Those who dared to question what they saw were vilified as conspiracy theorists and morons at best and traitors and terrorists at worst.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The final straw for these people would be a special election in Georgia to determine Senate control. People went to bed expecting the Republicans would retain those two seats, leaving the new president with a divided Congress.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

It is now clear that the protests became confrontational during the president's speech, calling the president's claim that he led them into question. What is true is that some people entered the legislative building with the help of the Capitol Police.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This footage from the United States Department of Justice shows surveillance video of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. At around 2:33 PM, five individuals are allowed to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. A man holding an American flag catches the door as the last protester leaves and waves to the crowd outside. At 2:34 PM, another man with a red cap approaches the interior doors and the police officer holds the door for him as he enters the Capitol. By 2:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol with police officers standing at the doors, allowing people to pass.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following footage was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper west terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Just after 2:33 PM, Police officers allow 5 individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 2:34 pm, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 2:34 pm, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 2:35 pm, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors, allowing people to pass.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Before protesters were led in, we can see the first people to enter the Capitol were wearing full tactical gear, which also supports the evidence that this was indeed an organized event, even though the FBI has been backtracking on that statement about conservatives lately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the video, the speaker points out the first group of attackers breaking into a building. The second person to enter through the window is wearing complete tactical body armor and is holding a baseball bat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want you to pay attention to the 1st group of assailants as they break into the building. The 2nd man through the window is wearing full tactical body armor and is carrying a baseball bat.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Confirmed Antifa Member John Sullivan can be seen in the same gear days while publicly organizing Antifa's plans before J6 and during the protest, we can see him being led into the Capitol with CNN.

Video Transcript AI Summary
To properly dress for a black block, it's important to wear all black without any logos. Wearing a black t-shirt with a logo on the sleeve or chest is not allowed. The goal is to avoid being identified at the end of the day. I have listed the items I'm currently wearing on my website, where you can purchase them at the same prices as in stores. This is for all my comrades out there who understand what I mean.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So properly dressed, black block. Pretty simple. All black. But a lot of people get the misconception. Maybe you can wear a black t shirt that has a logo on it on the sleeve or on the chest. No. You cannot. No logos guys. 0. None. You cannot have anything that they would be able to come back and identify you at the end of the day. I have listed all the items that I have on right now that I purchased, that I've worn on my website. I've gone through the liberty of putting them on there so you guys can buy them off there for the same prices that you would get in the store. All you comrades out there Know what I'm talking about.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

While protesters were inside the Capitol, members of Antifa were seen and reported starting majority of the chaos that was being reported, it appears these reports fell on death ears as there were no reports of Antifa having any connection to J6th.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Anyone who paid attention to Joe Biden leading up to the election knew full well that this was an absurd proposition, yet when all newscasters said it long enough, it became the reality. So, the narrative was set. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/6/trump-coverage-still-90-negative-says-new-study/

Trump coverage still 90% negative, says new study It has been a pattern since President Trump was inaugurated well over a year ago. Coverage of the White House on the "Big Three" broadcast networks -- ABC, CBS and NBC -- remains 91 percent negative, according to a new study by the Media Research Center, which has been tracking the phenomenon since Mr. Trump took office. washingtontimes.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Apologies, this clip was supposed to go on this TWEET. https://t.co/DFFnHyjEpJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
In their 10th hearing, the committee decides to issue a subpoena for relevant documents and testimony from Donald Trump. This is seen as a big deal, but some feel it's like adding another parking ticket to a van that never gets paid. It's questioned why they are only deciding on this now, comparing it to a murder investigation where they only talk to the murderer on the last day. Despite Trump's potential conflict, as he sees it as a witch hunt but also recognizes the high ratings it would bring, it's unlikely he will defend himself on national television. The former president doesn't want the attention, even though it would generate record-breaking TV ratings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's their 10th hearing. The committee finally filled out the the punch card. See here. There you go. Oh, oh, that means the former president gets a free sub, Pina. Speaker 1: I am offering this resolution that the committee direct the chairman to issue a subpoena for relevant documents And testimony under oath from Donald John Trump. Speaker 2: I would say this is big news, but it's really more like putting 1 more parking ticket on that van that's been on your block for a year? Speaker 0: That ticket ain't getting paid. Speaker 2: Hell, yeah. Finally. How are they only deciding on this now? Only now? It's like doing a whole murder investigation and then on the last day being like, should we, like, talk to the murderer? Yeah? He might have some information about the murderer. Maybe. Speaker 3: At this point, I don't know what they need to hear from. It's all their case against Trump is about as obvious as an episode of Scooby Doo. Speaker 2: But I feel like he's gonna be a little conflicted. Yeah. Because on the one hand, yes, he thinks this is a crooked witch hunt that is out to get him. But on the other hand, the ratings. Can you imagine the ratings? This would be like the Super Bowl meets Watergate, Meets Game of Thrones meets a mandatory HR video about sexual harassment everyone Speaker 0: will be watching. Of course, it's never gonna happen. The former president doesn't want the opportunity to defend himself on national television. It would be watched by too many people on the biggest stage in the world. I mean, he doesn't wanna be the center of attention. He'd he'd get the highest TV ratings in history, but he doesn't wanna go up there and yell to the committee, you want the truth? You can't handle the truth. You also can't handle truth social, which is why no one is signing up. Right?
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 4:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unraveling the Events of January 6th: A Closer Look Summary: The events of January 6th, commonly referred to as the Capitol insurrection, have been the subject of intense debate and speculation. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the various perspectives and claims surrounding the incident. From allegations of orchestrated violence by Pelosi and Antifa to the role of Trump supporters in protecting the Capitol, we delve into the details to shed light on this controversial event.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BREAKING: Trumpers commit violent insurrection on J6. Not lol. @dom_lucre @KanekoaTheGreat J6ers fight Pelosi's Stasi (some bad Feds, CP, Antifa) to STOP vandalism of Capitol and to STOP Capitol Police from beating unarmed Protestors. #J6Files #J6Substack #J6 #Insurrection

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Pelosi/Feds/Antifa: 1. Brag they orchestrated Capitol Breech. Vids prove they did it. 2. Attack and murder Protestors. 3. Refuse National Guard backup. Trumpers: 1. Protect Capitol. 2. Protect protestors from renegade Capitol Police. 3. Protect Capitol Police from renegade Feds.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

1. Bad guys bragged in ecstasy about pulling off Capitol breach: A. Trump offered National Guard but Nancy-Mitch (with final say so on all Capitol security) refused. B. Fed Epps: 'I orchestrated it.' C. Antifa Johnny: 'We did it.'

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Nancy/Mitch, in charge of ALL Capitol security on J6, PLANNED to fail & were ECSTATIC they did! Pelosi: "IVE BEEN WAITING for this, for trespassing on Capitol grounds." McConnell “They failed in this insurrection. I feel exhilarated Trump FINALLY totally discredited himself.”

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

PELOSI-MITCH'S INSURRECTION They refused National Guard backup at Capitol 'as it would have been bad optics', but the real reason was they were plotting a violent insurrection (framing Trumpers) to interrupt 14 hours of Senate Objections to certification of the 2020 Election.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BLM Protestors in 2020 often blamed Feds (i.e., anarchists posing as RWWS) for infiltrating their Riots to incite violence. Hells Angel 'Umbrella Man' at the Autozone BLM Riot, who increased violence acuity at Riot, is case in point.

@javimorillo - Javier Morillo 🇵🇷🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦

This video was removed from YouTube. It shows exactly who broke windows at AutoZone. Please retweet and help identify the instigator. #JusticeForFloyd

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Despite BLM being hijacked by Fed infiltrators, BLM has been unwilling to admit that J6 was hijacked by Fed infiltrators. CNN paid Johnny Antifa $70k to instigate and film the entrapment and murder of Trumpers so MSM could frame MAGA hatters for Pelosis J6 Insurrection.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

INSIDE JOB Giant magnetic doors can't be opened except from the inside. Plain clothes 'Trumper' (waived on by Cops without fight) signals to Capitol Police, who then opens giant doors! CP did everything under Pelosis orders.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Here's Capitol Police on orders of Pelosi opening the giant magnetic doors to the US Capitol on J6. I always bring receipts.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

INSIDE JOB Pelosi didnt call for backup. To the contrary, Pelosi used Capitol Police to rile up the crowd and push them inside the Capitol using tear gas!

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨MASSIVE J6 DISCOVERY🚨 Timelapse video of the West Side of the Capitol shows the crowd move past police lines at 2:27 PM EST You know what happened at 2:26 PM? Bodycam footage shows a cop shooting a tear gas grenade *into police lines* causing them to retreat for air Watch!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rich is called over and told to put something out. There is confusion about where it should go. Rich is instructed to put it on the scaffolding. There is some frustration and urgency in the conversation. The speaker apologizes and says they are fired up. Rich is told to go and just shoot. There are some expletives used.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rich, Rich has a 40. Rich, over here. Marty, put it out. Frankie. Right right there. Where where wherever the hell is wrong here. Right over there. Put it out. Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it on the fucking scaffolding. Hey. Hey. I'll make sure Oh, no. Yes. I'm gonna go with that. I'm sorry. We're fired up in the air, Rich. Over there. Alright. Before this, I don't have my I got it. Go. Just fucking shoot. Fuck. Shit.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BEFORE TEAR GAS: PEACEFUL

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

AFTER TEAR GAS

@davidmweissman - David Weissman ✡️

I really would like to know how right wing propagandists, @TuckerCarlson, and @elonmusk can ignore this footage of the #January6th insurrection and lie about it? Do I need to do a thread of all the violent footage and tag them?

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

FEDS ORCHESTRATE IT FedEpps whispers into Antifa guys ear, then Antifa guy reverses MAGA hat to signal Rioters to BREECH barriers around Capitol. Note: only BLM raise their hands to Cops and say 'don't shoot' (as they falsely allege of Michael Brown).

@feelinblue815 - New Vaxx, Who Dis?

He's the start of the seige on the capital. Twitter do your thing. Who are these terrorists?

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

ANITFA ORCHESTRATES IT Johnny Sullivan said hes BLM and his brother said his brother Johnny is Antifa and orchestrated Capitol breech. Johnny said: "We gotta pull Trump out of office. We need Revolution!" Aka violent Insurrection.

@jiujitsu_freak - Michael Esquivel

@DebbieLynnMs2 @RickyBeBack John Sullivan-Antifa,admitting it

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions that their face is not on Instagram and they have learned that it is all fake. They also mention wearing a Trump hat and attending a Trump rally during the daytime. They claim to be a journalist and have their camera on their shoulder. The speaker states that Antifa is an idea, not an organization.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of but it's it's all fake. My my my face is not on Instagram. I learned that shit already. Can wear I'm gonna wear a trump hat I'm gonna wear a trump hat I bought 1 today I was wearing a trump hat at the last trump at the trump rally during the daytime because I was like nah that ain't happening bro. Yeah. I was. Oh, yeah. I was just a journalist, but I use that all the time. Yeah. I'm just a journalist. I'm here recording. I got my camera on my shoulder. Literally, I have my big ass camera on my shoulder right here. Antifa is an idea, not an

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Johnny Antifa brags: "We did it! Wait was that recorded?" Lol! Aka Johnny orchestrated the Capitol breach to escort unsuspecting Trumpers inside to be murdered.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Johnny Antifa relished in Ashley Babbits blood.

@AClDRayne - 🖤Rayne Storm🖤

@Threeefer @CaptCav69942178 He was in the building. He cracked a window. He was yelling 'BURN IT DOWN' & 'WE DID THIS'. His buddy smashed the window Ashli Babbit was shot through. He was detained for a few minutes, questioned, &freed. Why? CNN paid him $35,000 for his interview & the video of Ashli's murder

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 admits that the other person was right about something, but couldn't say much. They talk about making a film and how it's all fake. They mention not having their name or face on Instagram. Speaker 0 talks about wearing a Trump hat and attending a Trump rally during the daytime. They mention being a journalist and using a camera to record.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You were right. You did it. Dude, I was trying to tell you. I I couldn't say much. You were right. You just have to wash my chin. Oh my god. Is this not gonna be the best film you've ever made in your life? But it's it's all fake. My name my my face is not on Instagram. I learned that shit already. I can wear I'm gonna wear a Trump hat. I'm gonna wear I bought one today. I was wearing a Trump hat at the fucking last Trump at the Trump rally during the daytime because I was like, no. That shit ain't happening, bro. Yeah. I was. Oh, yeah. I was just a journalist, but I use that all the time. Yeah. I'm just a journalist. I'm here recording. I I got my camera on my shoulder. Literally, I have my big ass camera on my shoulder right here.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

On J5, Fed Epps and Johnny Antifa just chilling, inciting Captiol Breech.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

FedEpps (seen moments earlier with Antifa Johnny) suggests on J5: "I don't even like to say it cus I'll be arrested... but tomorrow we need to go INTO the Capitol." Trumpers respond: "Fed! Fed! Fed!" And mock Epps lol.

@AnnaMargaretAp1 - AMargaretAp1 🇺🇲

Morning MAGA,Patriots, Blue, Military Never Forget FBI Ray Epps Set-Up Everyone Jan 6th 👇👇👇 Release The Prisoners 🙏 Justice for Ashli Babbitt 🙋‍♀️

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. No, no, no, no, peacefully. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need to go in. Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Yeah, we need to go into the capital. Spread the word. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, shall we go out there? No? When we go in, are we gonna get arrested? We don't need to get shot, just arrested.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol. Into the Capitol. What? No. Peacefully. No. No. No. No. Peacefully dead dead dead dead dead dead dead. Tomorrow, I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need We need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Face, bed posting? Yeah. We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay. Where our problems are. It's that direction. Yeah. Please spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Josh, shall we go out there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? We need to get shot. Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Ray Epps texted his nephew: "I orchestrated it." To deflect, Epps later said he was no longer there when he texted that & it was a joke. But surveillance video proves Epps orchestrated it and lied when he said he was no longer there.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

So the Insurrecionist who bragged in text he ORCHESTRATED the Capitol breach (while he was still in it!) is actually a victim of Trumpers? Lmfao! #DNCVictimology #MartyrComplex #CoupCryers

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

1. Watch two groups in tug of war: the first damage the Capitol, the second protect it. The first group is well-equipped Feds & lowkey BLM/Antifa with false flag MAGA hats on. Second group is Trumpers.

@sanditarium - Sanditarium

@DC_Draino @RobertPhilbri12 Who is this woman directing?

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Other angles and examples of Trumpers protecting the Capitol and human lives:

@McBrideLawNYC - Joseph D. McBride, Esq.

The @January6thCmte edited @nickquested's footage deliberately to deceive the American public. Footage of protestors trying to save Roseanne Boyland's life and of their scolding the police for murdering Ashli Babbitt was removed because it doesn't support the official narrative.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

More Trumpers protecting Capitol:

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

JUST IN: Censored video re-emerges of ANTIFA IN BLACK CLAD attempting to break into the capitol while Trump supporters attempt to protect the building.. WON’T SEE THIS ON CNN..

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Brawl between Trumpers and violent Antifa insurrectionist:

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

JUST IN: Censored video re-emerges of ANTIFA IN BLACK CLAD being identified and forced from the steps of the Capitol by Trump Supporters.. WON’T SEE THIS ON CNN..

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

2. Michael Byrd, Pelosis right hand man, murdered unarmed female Trump supporter Ashley Babbit in cold blood. Deadly force is never justified unless a Cop fears for his life. 100 lbs peaceful protestor Ashley posed zero threat. Why not shoot in arm or leg?

@RandallMccaffry - Dr. Randall McCaffry

Who ordered the murder of Ashli Babbit?

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Here is the admittedly farfetched alternative 'rabbit hole view' of why Byrd wasn't charged with murder: because Ashley's still alive: https://rumble.com/v24cfg0-ashley-babbitt-hoax-by-wooz-news-everything-wrong-with-the-capitol-shooting.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2

Ashley Babbitt Hoax by Wooz News: 'Everything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting in 21 Minutes or Less' Ashley Babbitt Hoax by Wooz News: 'Everything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting in 21 Minutes or Less' Video shows too many inconsistencies with the Ashley Babbitt incident. Use your own discernment on rumble.com

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

2. Trumpers try to rescue Roseanne Boyle from being beaten to death by Capitol Police.

@3sidedstory - 3sidedstory 🇺🇲

Did everyone see this video of Roseanne Boyle and getting beat by Capitol police officers on January 6th? @julie_kelly2 @DarrenJBeattie @ColumbiaBugle @McBrideLawNYC

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Other angle of Boyle rescue:

@McBrideLawNYC - Joseph D. McBride, Esq.

The @January6thCmte edited @nickquested's footage deliberately to deceive the American public. Footage of protestors trying to save Roseanne Boyland's life and of their scolding the police for murdering Ashli Babbitt was removed because it doesn't support the official narrative.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Trumpers call out Y physically STOP Antifa. So much for MSM narrative! See well-coordinated FEDS (not prosecuted) break glass (some vids show Capitol Police HOLDING DOORS OPEN for sightseers). WHO is the non-existent Trumper charged with BREAKING Y entry?

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

3. Guided Tour with Drum Circle. Very very little property damage. No sit ins. Chansley quotes Trump saying be peaceful, be nice to men in blue, and go home. The DNV sit in at Wisconsin Capitol 2011 was much more interrupting and angry.

@stevenvoiceover - @stevenvoiceover

BREAKING : Previously Unseen January 6th Footage

Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to the US Capitol Building. Join us for the insurrection and check out our promotional leaflets. Stay in the safety quadrant and ask our capital police officers for directions. Enjoy activities like the photography tour, fancy dress competition, and climbing wall. Jacob Chansley won the competition and will receive a guided tour. Thank you for joining us, please clean up after yourselves, visit the souvenir shop, and join us on the outdoor terrace for the Insurrection Soiree with music by Jacob Chansley.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the US Capitol Building. If you've joined us today for the insurrection, please make sure you pick up a promotional leaflets on the way in. Stay inside the safety quadrant at all times. And if you get lost, speak to one of our capital police officers, they'll be sure to to point you in the right direction. And be sure to set aside a little time today to join us for some Insurrection activities including our photography tour, our fancy dress competition, and have a go on our climbing wall. But don't forget those safety ropes. And I've now received the results of our fancy dress competition. The winner today is Jacob Chansley. That's mister Jacob Chansley. If you could report to your nearest Capitol Police Officer, they'll be sure to give you your prize, a guided tour of the building. And all that's left is for me to thank you for joining us today. We hope you enjoyed the wherever possible, please try to clean up after yourselves. Don't forget to visit the souvenir shop on the way out, and feel free to join us on the outdoor terrace for Nancy those whose Insurrection Soiree, grab yourself a light refreshment, and enjoy the music of our very own fancy dress competition winner.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Chansley pretty chill. Like hey dudes, wanna Capitol Breech and Chill?

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

JUST IN: Censored video re-emerges of Jacob Chansley reading Trump’s tweet, telling protestors to GO HOME and remain peaceful.. WON’T SEE THIS ON CNN…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump, in a Reddit post, urges people at the US Capitol to stay peaceful and respect law enforcement. He emphasizes that the party stands for law and order and shows support for the men and women in blue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is read it. Donald Trump, is it? Donald Trump, Colt. I am asking for everyone in the US Capitol to remain peaceful. No, Rollins. Remember, we are the party of law and order. Respect our law enforcement. Yeah. The men and women in blue.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

3. It takes 8 or 10 Cops to keep Qanon Shaman in check? Notice there's no crowds, Cops aren't scared lol. Why don't they arrest him if he's trespassing? Garland would say DOJ can't arrest because Police on the ground chose not to arrest.

@greg_price11 - Greg Price

🚨BREAKING: Never before seen video of January 6 shows Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, being led through the Capitol by police the entire time that he was in the building.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jacob Chansley, a dangerous conspiracy theorist, received a nearly 4-year prison sentence for leading the violent insurrection to overthrow American democracy. There is dispute over how he entered the Capitol building, but internal surveillance videos reveal what happened once he was inside. The footage shows that Capitol Police never stopped Chansley and even acted as his tour guides. They took him to multiple entrances, tried to open locked doors for him, and were within touching distance of him. Chansley saw the police as his allies and thanked them in a prayer on the senate floor. This contrasts with the reality of his actions on January 6th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dangerous conspiracy theorist dressed in outlandish costume who led the violent insurrection to overthrow American democracy. For these crimes, Chansley was sentenced to nearly 4 years in prison, far more time than many violent criminals now receive. What did Jacob Chansley do to receive this punishment? To this day, there is dispute over how Chansley got into the Capitol building. But according to our review of the internal surveillance video, it is very clear what happened once he got inside. Virtually every moment of his time inside the Capitol was caught on tape. The tape show the Capitol Police never stopped Jacob Chansley. They helped him. They acted as his tour guides. Here's video of Chansley in the senate chamber. Capitol police officers take him to multiple entrances and even try to open locked doors for him. We counted at least 9 officers who were within touching distance of unarmed Jacob Chansley. Not one of them even tried to slow him down. Chansley understood that Capitol Police were his allies. Video shows him giving thanks for them in a prayer on the floor of the senate. Watch. Contrast the reality of what Jacob Chansley did in the Capitol building on January 6th. The

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

3. How many of yall copying me without credit? Lol. Cops act as door men and literally open Capitol doors for "trespassers". Pelosi opened magnetic doors! Is this the ultimate in entrapment. Old woman to Hansel & Gretel: come in kids we have goodies 4u!

@ZekeGary2 - Zeke_gary2

Evidence how D.C. set-up J6! FREE all J6 Political Prisoners! @SpeakerMcCarthy Ashli Babbitt? "J6 BOMBSHELL:DOJ Video shows Capitol police holding open “upper west terrace doors” on Jan 6… over 250 individuals allowed 2 walk into Capitol by police then later arrested & abused."

Video Transcript AI Summary
At 2:47 PM, police closed the doors of the capital as a crowd gathered inside. The police presence increased and no more people were allowed to enter through the Upper West Terrace doors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Crowd into the interior of the capital. At 2:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear closed the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individuals enter through the Upper West Terrace doors.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Trumpers help save Capitol Police. You can't script this!

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Stories @January6thCmte withheld: @CapitolPolice👮‍♂️Tarik Johnson & Oath Keeper Michael Nichols lead trapped USCP officers out of Capitol Lies of @libradunn Capitol Police Were Sacrificial Pawns on Jan. 6 - (Pt3) @TPC4USA https://thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com/post/3544429/capitol-police-were-sacrificial-pawns-on-jan-6-part-3

Capitol Police Were Sacrificial Pawns on Jan. 6 - (Part 3) As I’ve detailed in Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, The United States Capitol Police (USCP) frontline officers were purposefully blindsided by the events of January 6, 2021. Their leadership withheld vital intel, as well as information about the legally permitted events to take place that day on the Capitol lawn. Emerging from that day’s riotous melee were both heroes and villains. As we have become painfully aware over the last three years, what is force-fed us by our government officials and their sycophant media sources is far too often the exact opposite of the truth.This story is yet another such example . . . (Editorial Note: After I initially published this article, I was contacted by former USCP Lt. Tarik Johnson to make one important clarification to the story. Something which occurred before he rescued the 16 officers from the Capitol Building Rotunda area with the help of two Oath Keepers. He explained that was his second attempt to extract those trapped officers. His first attempt was initiated with the assistance of USCP Civil Disturbance Unit (CDU) officers, but the officers they were attempting to evacuate may not have been able to hear his directions because of the crowd noise in the Rotunda area. It was also during that first rescue attempt that a protestor put the red MAGA hat on his head, which then drew international attention to his story.) At 2:58 pm on January 6, 2021, USCP officer Lt. Tarik Johnson, having just completed the evacuation of the House of Representatives chamber, radioed the Command Center:“All right. Sir, I think the House side is totally clear.”A couple of minutes later, a USCP officer identifying himself as “Unit Motor 13” radioed a distress call:“We have about half a dozen officers that are trapped between hundreds of people and the Rotunda doors that cannot get out. The crowd is very hostile and we need additional officers here, hardened platoons with munitions to be able to clear these steps. It's an officer safety issue.”Having received no response for assistance, Motor 13 issued another distress call:“. . . on the center Rotunda steps we have approximately, maybe 13 officers up here. None of us are in hard gear. We have a few -- we have about a half dozen officers that are trapped between the Rotunda door and the crowd.”Hearing those messages, Lt. Johnson asked for the operator to patch him direct to Motor 13. Receiving confirmation for his request, Lt. Johnson radioed an instruction to that officer:“Just walk through the crowd and be friendly and walk out yourself. They’ll probably let you out. And advise the situation as you're walking through and be nice. But they'll probably let you out. Just be nice and walk down the steps.”This might seem an unusual directive, but Lt. Johnson had been moving back and forth through the growing crowd of protestors inside the Capitol — having successfully initiated the evacuation of both the Senate and House chambers — for almost an hour. Something in his demeanor was allowing him to pass through these protestors without eliciting aggression or impedance, even from the more hostile of those filling up the Capitol Building.By contrast, during this same period, USCP Officer Harry Dunn was having an opposite experience with protestors. This was despite the fact Dunn was carrying an M4 automatic rifle. At 2:39 pm, he was captured on a DC Metropolitan Police officer’s bodycam, screaming at and threatening protestors in The Crypt:“You’ll be finished, in one f-cking minute. You’re f-cking hurting us. Get the f-ck out of here. Get the f-ck out of here. You’re hurting us. You’re hurting us.”Dunn was quickly approached by a USCP captain who put his hand on Dunn’s shoulder, imploring him to calm down.USCP Captain rushing over to calm down Officer Harry Dunn in the Crypt room of the US Capitol Building (Source: DC Metro Police bodycam)In an interview that I recently conducted with another, unnamed USCP officer who has reached out to me with his own J6 story, he shared that officer Dunn was assigned as his Field Training Officer (FTO) when he graduated from the USCP Academy. Part of the training he received from Dunn was in “de-escalation” tactics when dealing with unruly protestors. In that phone interview, I played for the unnamed officer the audio quoted above. The officer responded:“Wow. That’s the exact opposite behavior for which he trained me.” After Lt. Johnson’s suggested behavior for Motor 13 and his group, to successfully extract themselves from their tenuous position in the mob, Motor 13 responded:“I don’t believe that's the situation considering a couple of us have already been pepper sprayed by personnel in the crowd. I don't believe that's the situation right now.”Beginning to consider how he would take action to rescue these officers who were “trapped” — in Motor 13’s own words — Lt. Johnson radioed:“Does anyone have a bullhorn that I could use? I need a bullhorn. Any arrest kits anywhere close and I’ll go get it.”The Operator responds to Lt. Johnson:“Simulcasting for 405-J, [Lt. Johnson’s call sign] I’ve got 20 ATF and FBI [tactical units] at the speaker’s lobby, where do you want them?”Lt. Johnson replies: “South barricade, I’ll meet them at the south barricade.”Operator: “They're already at the center, Speaker's lobby sir.”Johnson: “Are they in the building already, you said?”Operator: “They affirm, at Speaker's lobby. Johnson:  “Have them meet me at the Senate door, tell them to come back out of the building, we're going to go get the officers on the Rotunda steps.”Minutes go by with no response from the ATF and FBI tactical units. Lt. Johnson again radios a request for a bullhorn:“I need a Unit to get me a bullhorn. I need the FBI Unit or whatever responding units to meet me at the Senate door. Right now the demonstrators aren’t . . . protestors they're not hitting anybody, they're not doing anything to harm anybody. I need a bullhorn, I will use those officers and I will walk through the crowd and I will get them myself and we will do so safely. I just need a bullhorn. Can I get any Unit to get me a bullhorn? Bring it outside the Senate door. That's all I need. A bullhorn and those officers.”At some point during these radio exchanges, Lt. Johnson managed to acquire and don a red Make America Great Again ball cap. As Joe Hanneman of The Epoch Times reported, “Johnson said wearing the MAGA cap made the crowds more receptive to him, provided a level of safety that he likened to a tactical helmet, and served as a de-escalation tool.”Frustrated that he’s getting no response from the tactical teams, his additional calls for other units, and the bullhorn, Lt. Johnson again takes matters into his own hands. “Again,” because over an hour earlier Johnson had similar frustration when seeking permission from Assistant Chief Yoganada Pittman to evacuate both the Senate and House chambers, receiving no responses. As he told The Epoch Times:“I begged for help all day on Jan. 6, 2021, and I feel I was largely ignored . . . There was no response from anybody at the Command Center,” Johnson said. “I say even before I initiated evacuation, I say specifically, ‘We’ve got to start thinking about getting the people out before we don’t have a chance to.’ I heard no response. Then I asked for permission to evacuate. I heard no response.”Lt. Johnson radios:“Stand by, stand down, stand down. I'm going to go get them. Stand down.”Motor 13 responds:“Just be advised, you may also want to know that there's a window up here on the Center Rotunda steps, on the north side of the door, a window that has been breached. And if we leave this area they're going to have free reign to walk into the Capitol from this window.”Johnson:“I don't care if they go into the Capitol, they’ve got 1,500 people in the Capitol already. The only thing I'm concerned about is getting the officers off of the stairs. I just need a bullhorn and don't . . . thank you I got a bullhorn.”At this point, Lt. Johnson goes radio silent and encounters two Oath Keepers, one of whom was retired New York Police Sgt. Michael Nichols. This unfolding scene was famously captured by videographer Rico La Starza.From Starza’s video, we can hear the exchange in which the two Oath Keepers identify themselves to Johnson, and ask him how they can help. “If you guys can help me save some of the guys. If you can help me get aside these people, I’d appreciate it. I just need to get these other officers out. They’re scared. We’re getting beat up, but the people who didn’t go for help are laughing at us,” Johnson said.US Capitol Police Lt. Tarik Johnson with Oath Keepers “Steve” (center) and Michael Nichols outside of Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. (Source: Rico La Starza via The Epoch Times)Oath Keeper Michael Nichols shows his badge to Johnson and says, “I can do that. I can help,” said Nichols. Johnson then handed Nichols the bullhorn he’d acquired, and Nichols says, “All right, let’s go,” and begins heading toward the east stairs of the Capitol Building. Reaching the bottom of the stairs, Johnson says to Nichols, “Just let me hold onto you.” “We’re Here. We’ve Got You,” Nichols responds, as he takes the lead, with Johnson following — holding the hand of Nichols — and the second Oath Keeper taking the rear position with his hand on Johnson’s back.At 3:11 pm, the trio ascends the steps approaching the east side Columbus doors as one of them announces, “We’re Oath Keepers. Stand aside. Make a hole. We’re Oath Keepers.” The protestors part and allow them to pass. 31 minutes earlier — at 2:40 pm — the now infamous “Stack One” of Oath Keepers had already entered through those historic Columbus doors. Among this particular group of Oath Keepers were those now convicted of a wide range of felony charges in the first of three Oath Keepers trials. Included in this stack was Ken Harrelson, who was the first of the Oath Keepers to encounter USCP Officer Harry Dunn, who had just raced to the top of the Rotunda stairs carrying his M4 rifle. Highly distressed, Dunn shouted at Harrelson, “Officers down!”Harrelson: “Really?”Harrelson and the other Oath Keepers had not seen or even heard of any violence against law enforcement up to this point. Harrelson had been engaged in a security detail, escorting a group of VIPs from The Ellipse, some of whom were scheduled to speak at a stage on the Capitol grounds. An event that had been legally permitted by the Capitol Police weeks before January 6 . . . before the December 19, 2020 announcement of President Trump’s speech at The Ellipse.Harrelson’s protectees were led from The Ellipse to the Capitol’s east lawn without incident, navigating thousands of rally attendees who were moving toward the Capitol for the many scheduled speeches and marches to take place that afternoon. They arrived several minutes before protesters began breaching those east-side barricades and running toward the Capitol’s steps. Harrelson, nor any other Oath Keeper participated in that breach, only moving in the direction of the Capitol after police had been ordered to withdraw and those barricades had been removed. Even after taking a position on the Capitol steps, waiting for other Oath Keepers to arrive while singing the National Anthem along with the crowd, Harrelson had not witnessed any violence. When he finally moved with the surging throng through the Columbus doors, there was no longer any resistance from the small group of USCP officers at the doorway.Dunn continued:“Yes . . . [inaudible] . . . ‘em out on stretchers. They are f-cking us up . . . [inaudible]. Oath Keepers Kelly Meggs, Jessica Watkins, and Ken Harrelson (L to R) take a positionbetween January 6 protestors and USCP Officer Harry Dunn (in back) (Source: Unknown)Harrelson and three other Oath Keepers immediately took up position between officer Dunn and the more agitated and unruly protestors. They stand side by side, with their backs turned to Dunn, facing the protestors. Publicly available videos capture this crucial event. At one point, Harrelson can be seen using both extended arms to hold back protestors from Dunn’s position at the top of the staircase. Several eyewitness accounts attest to the fact this small group of Oath Keepers de-escalated an extremely volatile situation, as some of those protesters being kept from Dunn were taunting him, calling him a variety of names.One protestor shouted at Dunn, “You’re a bully. You’re a bully with a badge!” Others can be heard chanting, “Oathbreaker! Oathbreaker.”Keeping those more hostile elements of the crowd away from Dunn probably saved lives, as the highly-distressed officer was near a breaking point. Within only a few minutes, hard unit officers arrived at the top of the staircase and led Dunn away.Oath Keeper Ken Harrelson holds back unruly protestors, keeping them awayfrom USCP Officer Harry Dunn (Source: Stephen Horn)There was one word not heard or captured on video being chanted by any of those protestors. The “N-word.”In Officer Dunn’s many press interviews, in his FBI interviews, and in his testimony before the January 6 House Select Committee, Dunn often repeated the claim that he had been called the N-word by many protestors. There were multiple variations of the same story he repeated, but in a podcast interview by The New York Times reporter, Michael Barbaro, Dunn explained:“I can’t fight nobody else. I can’t. I’m tired. And it’s like 30, or 40, 50 people. I can’t fight y’all. Let’s talk, man. So they started talking about how Joe Biden didn’t win the election . . . And I said I voted for Joe Biden. Does my vote not count?“And then — and then that’s when the girl said, ‘You hear that? This n-word voted for Joe Biden, guys.’ And then the whole 20, 30, 40, 50 people that were there said, ‘this n-word voted for Joe Biden. Boo!’”Except, in what was probably the most recorded event in human history, with at least one out of three protestors holding their cell phone cameras aloft, there has been no video or audio evidence presented that this racist, N-word chant ever took place on January 6.In one of my face-to-face meetings with Lt. Tarik Johnson, he was accompanied by another, now-retired USCP officer. (Dunn, Johnson, and this unnamed officer are all black men.) I asked the two about that story Officer Dunn had repeated so many times.The unnamed officer stopped me, “Are you asking me if anyone called Dunn a n-gger that day?”“Yes.”“Never happened,” he resolutely responded.Another story by The New York Times related how many USCP officers were not thrilled with Dunn constantly sharing the N-word story in his many press interviews. “To some, when Dunn talked about the racism he endured on Jan. 6, he made it sound as if it was ‘all about race.’”During my interview with the unnamed USCP officer first mentioned in this story, he went into further detail about his relationship with Dunn during the 12 weeks in which Dunn was his FTO. Dunn “seemed like a good guy, very professional, and down to earth,” but “he always had a way of bringing racism or black culture into conversations.”This officer went on to tell me, “We lost our relationship after January 6. He [Dunn] even deleted me from social media. That is the general feeling throughout the force.”Another telling revelation in my interview with this unnamed USCP officer was the fact he also had a rather low opinion of Lt. Johnson, despite that they don’t personally know one another. This comes from the fact that two officers in his unit were part of the 16 rescued by Johnson and the two Oath Keepers. They had relayed to this officer that Johnson had unnecessarily “endangered them” by escorting them through the crowd of protesters. According to this officer, his unit members did not feel “trapped” or “unsafe” in their location near the Rotunda doors.What those two thepragmaticconstitutionalist.locals.com

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

2. Antifa censor thread already. Here AGAIN is Trumpers physically fighting to STOP Antifa as they break windows into the Capitol. You won't see this vid on CNN lol.

@colonelcrystal1 - COL (Ret) Angel A. Valencia, Judge Advocate

Watch true Trump supporters bring down Antifa scums who were trying to break Capitol’s glass windows!

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

1. TEAR GAS FORCES CROWD TO BREAK THE POLICE LINE: (OP censored so here's redo)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rich is called over and told to put something under the scaffolding. There is some confusion and back-and-forth between the speakers. They mention being fired up and someone says to shoot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rich. Rich has a 40. Rich, over here. 40. Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it under the fucking scaffolding. Hey. Hey. I'll make sure Oh, no. Yes. No. No. I'm gonna go with that. Sorry. Go back. We're fired up in the air, Rich. Over there. Alright. Alright. Before this, I don't have my I got it. Go. Just fucking shoot.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BEFORE TEAR GAS: PEACEFUL

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

AFTER TEAR GAS: BREAK LINE TO GET AIR Note that TWO MEN DIED from canister munitions and tear gas inhalation, and even Cops needed long timeouts for gas inhalation. Capitol Police were 10x more agressive on J6 with tear gas than at Lafeyette Square, but MSM selectively outraged.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

JOURNALIST'S VIDEO THREAD OF PELOSI'S STASI TEAR GAS ATTACK ON PROTESTORS

@TaylerUSA - Tayler Hansen

Here’s the moment I had to put out a man that was on fire after the USCP bombarded the crowd with explosive munitions. In under 30 seconds, over 4 munitions were thrown into a peaceful crowd. Everything the Media and Establishment is telling you about January 6th is a LIE.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses surprise and excitement about something happening, possibly a fire. They mention being fired and ask if the other person is okay. They comment on capturing something on camera and reassure the other person that they are fine. The speaker also suggests that they may have accidentally caused someone to catch fire. They end by asking how the other person feels.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Hey. Fire. Hey. I'm fired. I'm fired. Hey. You good? You good? Bastard. Hey. Here's That was good. No. You're good. I got that on camera. You're good. You alright? Mother. Maybe you just caught him on fire. Woo hoo. How you feel?

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

3. LITERAL FALSE FLAG Pelosi's Stasi carry Confederate Flags to frame Trumpers for white supremacy. Not even subtle guys! Oh youuuu! lol

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Let's just pretend that this Antifa guy wasn't handing out makeshift weapons to his buddies FROM INSIDE THE CAPITOL. Who put them there? Have any of them been prosecuted or do they have liberal immunity from prosecution? Lol. #LiberalPrivilege

@Rosemary5775 - Rosemary

@Czesc45 @Make70sGreat

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is preparing for a disguise and asks for advice on what to wear. They consider wearing a mask and ultimately decide on an American-themed mask. They discuss the importance of blending in and having a visual identifier. The speaker mentions bringing both masks in their backpack and jokingly mentions working for Fox News, CNN, and another company simultaneously. The conversation ends with a comment about the need for a visual element to gain trust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's getting his disguise on. Okay. So I was gonna wear this. I'm gonna wear a mask underneath the mask. You should wear this. I'm wondering if I should wear what do you think I should wear? Should wear this or this? Yeah. Here. This is your mask. Oh my god. The America mask. I'm asking you to give me Dude, I'm not I'm not fucking with you. You you gotta blend in. I know you can't stomach wearing it, but, Like, you need to blend in. You can't you have to have a visual identifier. Mhmm. I if not you're not coming if you're not wearing this. Alright. You you could also wear this. Yeah. The the America might be my move. Both of you. We'll keep I'll bring them both in my backpack. We've got Fox News. Oh, wait. This is CNN. We're ready to, I work I don't know if we're committing crimes doing this, but, you know, like, we're Are you insinuating that I don't work for All 3 of these companies simultaneously I am at least a little bit insinuating that. You feel like you think that I don't Work for all of them. They they won't trust you unless there's a visual, like, there's something

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

More stories of Trumpers RESCUING Capitol Police. Thank God for Trumpers being there to STOP the violent Pelosi Stasisurrectionists!

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Nichols & Steve, two Oath Keepers and others would go into the @uscapitol at the request of a desperate @CapitolPolice lieutenant and rescue 15 riot-gear-clad officers and one uniformed officer trapped inside You won’t hear that from @January6thCmte https://www.theepochtimes.com/exclusive-retired-police-sergeant-oath-keeper-helped-rescue-capitol-police-on-jan-6-at-the-moment-the-world-needed-it_4811330.html

EXCLUSIVE: Retired Police Sergeant, Oath Keeper Helped Rescue Capitol Police on Jan. 6 'At the Moment the World Needed It' theepochtimes.com

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Fedsurrectionist comedian Ray Epps incites violence by bludgeoning Capitol Police using GIANT MAGA SIGN to frame Trumpers lol! https://t.co/3mncyAuk3N

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Ray Epps has been seen on @uscapitol steps helping shove a giant @realDonaldTrump sign into @DCPoliceDept & @CapitolPolice, & has never been arrested An LA Times reporter caught him on camera afterwards, back in the crowd, talking to people https://t.co/wXisaFXNMz

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Last Redo: INSIDE JOB Pelosi didnt call for backup. To the contrary, Pelosi used Capitol Police to rile up the crowd and push them inside the Capitol using tear gas! See peaceful BEFORE video and less peaceful AFTER video: https://t.co/6VpWrcfHxw

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨MASSIVE J6 DISCOVERY🚨 Timelapse video of the West Side of the Capitol shows the crowd move past police lines at 2:27 PM EST You know what happened at 2:26 PM? Bodycam footage shows a cop shooting a tear gas grenade *into police lines* causing them to retreat for air Watch! https://t.co/NeCiNY3VqR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rich is being called over and told to put something out. There is confusion about where it should be placed. Rich is instructed to put it on the scaffolding. There is some frustration and urgency in the conversation. The speaker apologizes and mentions being fired up in the air. Rich is told to go and just shoot. There are some expletives used.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rich, Rich has a 40. Rich, over here. Marty, put it out. Frankie. Right right there. Where where wherever the hell is wrong here. Right over there. Put it out. Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it on the fucking scaffolding. Hey. Hey. I'll make sure Oh, no. Yes. I'm gonna go with that. I'm sorry. We're fired up in the air, Rich. Over there. Alright. Before this, I don't have my I got it. Go. Just fucking shoot. Fuck. Shit.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BEFORE TEAR GAS PEACEFUL https://t.co/WllPrlqzgO

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BEFORE TEAR GAS: PEACEFUL https://t.co/eyUWV65Q0i

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

AFTER TEAR GAS: CROWD BREAKS POLICE LINE, FORCING STAGED MELEE 2 DIED from cannister munitions! Even Cops had to take time out from gas inhalation. CP on J6 100x more aggressive with tear gas than CP at Lafeyette Square, but MSM selectively outraged! https://t.co/6ezsCVum75

@davidmweissman - David Weissman ✡️

I really would like to know how right wing propagandists, @TuckerCarlson, and @elonmusk can ignore this footage of the #January6th insurrection and lie about it? Do I need to do a thread of all the violent footage and tag them? https://t.co/Blt00v7gOa

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

HERES THE OBVIOUSLY STAGED MELEE THAT PELOSI HERSELF CREATED BY SHOOTING TEAR GAS AT A PEACEFUL CROWD https://t.co/C9eQW2Xuhx

@davidmweissman - David Weissman ✡️

Here’s more violent footage of #January6th, do you really believed you were lied to @elonmusk? @TuckerCarlson knew the truth but lies to yours and his viewers face. https://t.co/Zg7KmHHwxm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: It was chaos. This is now President William Ryan. At 13:49 hours, a riot was declared. We had around 250 officers, but within 30 minutes, we lost about 40 officers who were incapacitated. If this continues, we'll run out of officers. We're struggling to hold them back, but it's like trying to grab water with your hand. They're coming from everywhere, unstoppable. I look up and see people above me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was came to hand whatever you can find combat. This Speaker 1: is now for president William Ryan. Speaker 2: 13:49 hours declaring a riot. Speaker 1: At that point in time, we Amy had 250 there and lost a good 40 officers in about 30 minutes that were incapacitated in some way. And I'm thinking to myself, if I keep losing this number of officers in this short period period of time, we're gonna be out of officers. Speaker 2: We're trying to keep them back, but they're just it's it's like trying to grab a gallon of water with your hand. They're just coming from everywhere, and there's no stopping them. Speaker 1: I'm looking around, and I see people above me

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

1. Add Mitchell Gardner to the list of Antifa infiltrators who attacked CP & broke windows with MAGA Hats to frame Trumpers. FBI called Mitchell 'defacto ringleader of Capitol Riots and attack on police'! Mitchell, Johnny and Epps orchestrated it. https://t.co/UsQgFPBiZa

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Turns out 'MAGA Hat dude' BREAKING CAPITOL WINDOW on J6 and INJURING COPS with Pepper Spray IS ANTIFA like Trumpers In J6 video chanted 'Antifa'! Trumpers were right: Capitol Breechers were infiltrators posing as Trumpers! He voted Obama 2x, never Trump. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-florida-man-supported-obama-and-didn-t-vote-for-trump-then-he-stormed-the-capitol-pepper-sprayed-cops-broke-a-2-900-window-and-got-4-5-years-in-prison/ar-AA18OMXa?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=f25e0f6242144de0aa6782738d95d128&ei=25 https://t.co/dz68wQplp7

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

1. Capitol Police act as cheer leaders and tour guides of Pelosis Insurrectionists: https://t.co/KZpZmSPYFB

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

JUST IN: Video emerges purportedly showing undercover Metropolitan Police Department officers PUSHING AND ENCOURAGING J6 protesters to breach lines and move forward.. https://t.co/6qf5UeNNE1

Saved - November 18, 2023 at 4:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unraveling the Events of J6: Orchestrated Breach and Controversial Actions Summary: J6, a day marked by a mostly peaceful protest, witnessed a breach of the Capitol orchestrated by individuals linked to Pelosi, including Fed Epps and Gardner, both Obama voters. Video evidence reveals preplanning and Pelosi's involvement in opening magnetic doors. Tear gas was deployed, leading to chaos and casualties. Notably, Epps confessed to orchestrating the breach, while Gardner's actions were falsely attributed to Trump supporters. The events raise questions about the role of infiltrators and Capitol security.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

J6 WAS A BEAUTIFUL DAY LIKE TRUMP SAID! A mostly peaceful protest except attack on Capitol Police and Capitol Breech orchestrated BY Pelosi (pepper sprayed crowd, opened magnetic doors) AND BY two Obama voters FedEpps & Gardner whom FBI called ‘de facto ringleader’. @dom_lucre https://t.co/fyq5nHwURP

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

OBAMA SUPPORTERS ORCHESTRATED J6 Pelosi, Fed Epps, and Antifa Johnny Sullivan said they were waiting for Capitol Breach, explicitly called for it, and explicitly confessed to orchestrating it:

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BREAKING: Trumpers commit violent insurrection on J6. Not lol. @dom_lucre @KanekoaTheGreat J6ers fight Pelosi's Stasi (some bad Feds, CP, Antifa) to STOP vandalism of Capitol and to STOP Capitol Police from beating unarmed Protestors. #J6Files #J6Substack #J6 #Insurrection https://t.co/WGp1180XYW

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

SMOKING GUN FOREKNOWLEDGE OF J6 INSURRECTION On J5, Fed Epps and Antifa Johnny can both be seen ON VIDEO calling for everyone to TRESPASS INTO THE CAPITOL. This proves preplanning so obvious that the crowd yells ‘Fed, Fed, Fed’ at them. https://t.co/pQwcDZTasK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol peacefully. I apologize for my previous comments. We should not engage in any violent behavior. However, we should still gather at the Capitol. I didn't expect to say this, but we need to make our voices heard. We should be cautious though, as we don't want to get arrested or harmed. Let's stand together and make a peaceful statement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tomorrow, we need to go into the Capitol. Peacefully dead dead dead dead dead dead dead. Tomorrow, I don't even like Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Based bad posting? Yeah. We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go out there? No? When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

PELOSI NEVER DENIES OPENING MAGNETIC DOORS Pelosi ON VIDEO eagerly WAITING for CAPITOL TRESPASS while simultaneously opening magnetic doors & 6 times refusing National Guard! Pelosi forced the crowd through the doors she opened by throwing tear gas at them. All of this on video!

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

JAIL PELOSI Who else noticed BOTH Pelosi & Epps joked about being JAILED on J6, long BEFORE the Capitol Breech? Guilty conscience? How’d they KNOW B4 there’d be ‘TRESPASS INTO THE CAPITOL’? Pelosi knew because she was in charge of Capitol security and opened the magnetic doors. https://t.co/nYCfQhNci7

Video Transcript AI Summary
I plan to go to the capital and trespass, even though I might get arrested. We should all go tomorrow, but we have to be careful not to say it out loud. We need to spread the word and go inside the capital building. We should avoid getting shot and instead get arrested together.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll be coming. I'm gonna punch him out. This is why I know I would pay this bill. They're waiting for this, for trespassing on the capital grounds. I wanna punch him out. I'm gonna go to jail. I'm gonna be happy. Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. We're heading on. Into the capital. What? Tomorrow. I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, boomer. To the capital. Face red posting? Alright. We need to go into the capital. I didn't see that coming in. Okay. Look far. It's that direction. Yeah. Please spread the word. Alright. No, David. But one more thing. Yes. We go out there? No. When we go in Are we gonna get arrested? We go upstairs. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

CAPITOL POLICE ENTRAP CROWD BY KEEPING DOORS WIDE OPEN FOR THEM TO WALK IN Pelosi opened magnetic doors to the Capitol, I.e., Capitol Police Master at Arms opened the doors 100% under Pelosi’s direction: https://t.co/O2KLLEnaM5

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BEFORE AND AFTER TEAR GAS Here’s before and after Pelosi’s tear gas attack with time elapsed video. https://t.co/1ejW6DR0Cb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mitch and Rich are having a conversation near some scaffolding. Mitch tells Rich to put something under the scaffolding, but it's unclear what exactly. Mitch assures Rich that he will take care of it. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mitch, Hey, Rich. Put it under the fucking scaffolding. Hey. I'll make sure Oh, no. Yeah. Gonna Go

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

BEFORE TEAR GAS PEACEFUL Here’s J6 Protestors before Pelosi ordered tear gas thrown at them, I.e., peaceful protestors calmly behind the police line: https://t.co/L4rrNOjDDp

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

AFTER TEAR GAS MELEE Here’s J6 Protestors after Pelosi ordered tear gas thrown at crowd, I.e., two killed by tear gas canisters and, grasping for air, the crowd crosses the police line in a staged melee: https://t.co/hQ4kDOjZS1

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

PELOSI AND RAY EPPS WERE NEVER PROSECUTED FOR OPENING DOORS, TAKING DOWN POLICE BARRICADES, KILLING PROTESTORS, AND ASSAULTING POLICE Epps was never prosecuted though he clearly assaulted Capitol Police ON VIDEO by throwing a Giant MAGA sign at them, & had barricades taken down:

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Ray Epps has been seen on @uscapitol steps helping shove a giant @realDonaldTrump sign into @DCPoliceDept & @CapitolPolice, & has never been arrested An LA Times reporter caught him on camera afterwards, back in the crowd, talking to people https://t.co/wXisaFXNMz

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

NOT KIDDING LOLS Fed Epps confessed in a text to his nephew: ‘I orchestrated it.’ Epps later said he was kidding, except Epps can be seen orchestrating Capitol Breech at roughly the same time he texted his nephew thus proving he wasn’t kidding: https://t.co/5yevP7OJPB https://t.co/vFUlgvsv6n

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

It’s interesting that on January 6, the Proud Boys walked by Peace Memorial @uscapitol, & kept walking to East side, remaining behind barriers Ray Epps, on the other hand, was at (and we would allege directing) the initial breach at Peace Mem, followed by breach 2 at West Steps https://t.co/jUpQzT2fjB

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

OBAMA VOTERS WITH RED MAGA HATS ORCHESTRATE J6 FBI call Gardner ‘the de facto ringleader of J6’. It came out later he voted Obama three times, Trump never. His breaking windows and throwing tear gas at Cops was widely shown on CNN as ‘proof’ of Trumper insurrection lol.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Turns out 'MAGA Hat dude' BREAKING CAPITOL WINDOW on J6 and INJURING COPS with Pepper Spray IS ANTIFA like Trumpers In J6 video chanted 'Antifa'! Trumpers were right: Capitol Breechers were infiltrators posing as Trumpers! He voted Obama 2x, never Trump. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-florida-man-supported-obama-and-didn-t-vote-for-trump-then-he-stormed-the-capitol-pepper-sprayed-cops-broke-a-2-900-window-and-got-4-5-years-in-prison/ar-AA18OMXa?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=f25e0f6242144de0aa6782738d95d128&ei=25 https://t.co/dz68wQplp7

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 12:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The new indictment against Trump reveals a dark and depraved plan. During the 2020 elections, numerous events occurred simultaneously: George Floyd protests, COVID release, lockdowns, election rule changes, mail-in ballots, no voter ID, free speech destruction, and censorship. They broke every rule to ensure Biden's victory. But they fear Trump's potential in 2024. They orchestrated January 6th, framing it as an insurrection. Now, they aim to charge Trump and disqualify him from future presidential runs using the 14th Amendment. This plan is cravenly evil.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

This is what is so duplicitous about this new indictment against Trump— this is what makes it so unbelievably dark and depraved: It was ALL a set up. So many things were hitting all at once during the 2020 elections: -George Floyd protests -release of COVID from China -COVID lockdowns -changing of all election rules -mail in ballots -ballot dumps -no voter ID -destruction of free speech -online “misinformation” censorship -Hunter Biden laptop censorship They were able to break EVERY SINGLE RULE in the book to drag Joe Biden across the finish line while he sat in his basement like a muppet. But they know they can’t do it again. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice— the American people won’t let it happen. Donald Trump won 75 million LEGAL votes in 2020 and they are terrified he will do it again in 2024. So they have to do everything in their power to make sure he can’t. They orchestrated January 6th with undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters encouraging people to trespass into the Capitol. The crowd was FILLED with federal agents. The goal was to get people INSIDE the building. The Capitol Police Chief begged Nancy Pelosi to send the National Guard. 71 mins passed by and Nancy Pelosi REFUSED to answer calls for back up. The breach happened at the Capitol BEFORE Trump was even finished speaking. And then they framed the whole event as an “insurrection”. So now, they can charge Donald Trump for “insurrection” and use the 14th Amendment to disqualify him from ever running for president again. Do you understand now? Do you see how cravenly evil the plan has been all along?

Saved - August 10, 2023 at 9:38 PM

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

FLASHBACK: Full uncensored video emerges from J6 showing Trump supporters ATTEMPTING TO STOP man breaking windows and trying to enter the Capitol. The man is wearing tactical gear and what looks to be an earpiece. J6 WAS A SETUP FROM THE BEGINNING..

Saved - August 15, 2023 at 5:56 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Here’s Some January 6th Footage The Jan 6 Committee & Media Would NEVER EVER Show You. Censored video showing WEAPONS being handed out from INSIDE the Capitol.. It was a Deep State FEDsurrection. #J6

Saved - September 26, 2023 at 5:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During Trump's tenure, MAGA events in DC were often disrupted by violent Antifa groups. However, despite extensive footage of the J6 incident, there is no evidence of Antifa's presence that day. It's clear they were there, disguised as MAGA supporters wearing masks. This raises questions about their coordination and potential involvement with the Deep State. Congressional testimony confirms the FBI's informants within MAGA crowds, so it's likely they also have Antifa informants. The possibility of federal agents leading Antifa may explain why the organization hasn't been disbanded.

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Watched a J6 doc last night & something stuck out to me Almost every MAGA event in DC during Trump’s tenure would be intercepted by violent hordes of Antifa Remember how they destroyed DC during Trump’s inauguration? Well we have millions of hours of footage of J6, and yet not 1 clip shows a mass demonstration of Antifa in black bloc that day Do people really think they took the day off? No, they were at J6 and it’s very easy to spot them - they dressed like “MAGA” but wore masks True MAGA Patriots didn’t wear masks but when you rewatch J6 footage you see hundreds of face-masked violent agitators on the front lines And the thing is, if Antifa is this “decentralized” Leftist foot soldier gang with no leadership then how were they all on the same page that day with the plan? I believe we will one day expose how the Deep State coordinated their actions through proxies Antifa was in on the Fedsurrection

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protesters clashed with police as small fires were set throughout the day. The demonstrators aimed to raise the temperature and one of them even threw a flash bang grenade back at the police, injuring an officer. Tear gas was used and six officers were reportedly injured in the confrontation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are booked? Police had to push back the protesters so firefighters could get to the flames. Small fires had appeared all day. This upped the temperature, which, of course, was the point. 1 demonstrator threw a flash bang grenade back at police. It exploded in an officer's face. Plenty of tear gas, 6 officers reportedly injured.

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

We now have Congressional testimony confirming the FBI has a “not known” number of paid informants in the MAGA crowds on J6 Do you think they don’t have Antifa paid informants? Of course they do If anything, they probably have federal agents leading the organization Hence why it hasnt been disbanded

Saved - September 27, 2023 at 1:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6, a series of events unfolded at the Capitol that raised questions and revealed inconsistencies. Despite media narratives, former President Trump called for peace and urged protesters to go home. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 was in place in 2021, allowing objections to the Electoral Count. Contrary to initial reports, no police officers died that day, and some suicides occurred later. The Capitol Police Chief was silenced, and there were indications of a setup. Antifa's presence and FBI involvement were also revealed. Ray Epps, a person of interest, had a disturbing past. Entrapment and undercover identifiers further suggest a setup. The truth behind January 6 continues to emerge.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

🚨 MASTER THREAD 🧵 JANUARY 6 BOOKMARK THIS THREAD! I am releasing everything I have collected over the years into this one thread. This post will be updated a few posts at a time & all future information will be dropped into this post. Let’s begin…

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite the mockingbird media saying that Donald Trump “incited an insurrection”, this was his message on January 6… “I know your pain. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have Law & Order. We have to respect our great people in Law & Order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s been a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this, where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us. From me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have PEACE. So go HOME. We LOVE YOU. You’re very SPECIAL. You’ve seen what happens, you see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel. But go HOME And go HOME in PEACE.” 🙏 This Video https://rumble.com/v34gqif-donald-trump-tells-january-6-protestors-to-go-home-in-peace.html You can watch Trumps full speech on January 6 here https://rumble.com/v34gpbn-january-6-trumps-speech-at-the-save-america-march-in-washington-dc.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your pain and hurt. The election was stolen from us, even though it was a landslide victory. We need to go home now and prioritize peace, law and order. We must respect our law enforcement and avoid anyone getting hurt. This is an unprecedented time where they could take away our democracy. Although this election was fraudulent, we can't play into their hands. We love you, you're special. We've witnessed the mistreatment of others, but it's important to go home peacefully.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened and where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
Donald Trump Tells January 6 Protestors to “Go Home in Peace” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Trumps Speech at the Save America March in Washington DC Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite what Mike Pence says or the Mockingbird Media tries to Amplify, Mike Pence did have the Constitutional Authority to Pause the Vote 2001 Al Gore<> 2021 Mike Pence The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2001 The Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA) was in place in 2021 In 2001, any congressman who wanted to raise an objection, the ECA of 1887 insists that he/she needs the signed support of one ONE Senator. In 2021, Congressman Paul Gosar, along with 60+ of his colleagues objected to the Electoral Count of Arizona. The objection was in writing & was signed by a senator. There were others. The (ECA) of 1887 was then REPLACED with the Electoral Count Reform Act of 2022 in a now successful attempt to change the VP’s role. Our elected/selected officials are guilty of treason. https://rumble.com/v35yusg-january-6-2001-2021-gore-pence-pence-could-have-sent-it-back.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the certification of the election results, Al Gore presided over the event as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate. If a congressman wanted to object, they needed the signed support of one senator. One congressman objected, stating that the Supreme Court, not the people, decided the election. However, the objection was not signed by a senator. Another congressman from Arizona then objected, with the objection being in writing and signed by a senator. The video ends with a statement that President Trump was wrong in claiming the right to overturn the election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of the House of Representatives and the Senate was to certify the election results. Al Gore, in his dual role as outgoing Vice President and President of the Senate, presided over the event that would officially anoint George W. Bush as the new President. If any congressman wanted to raise an objection, the rules insisted that he or she had to have the signed support of just 1 senator. Speaker 1: Mister president, it is in writing and signed by myself on behalf of many of the diverse constituents in our country, Especially those in the 9th congressional district and all American voters who recognize that the Supreme Court, not the people of the United States, decided this election. Speaker 2: Is the objection, signed by a senator? Speaker 1: Unfortunately, mister president, it is not signed by 1 single senator. Speaker 2: Are there any objections to counting the certificate of vote of the State of Arizona that the teller has verified appears to be regular, informed, and authentic? Speaker 3: Mister Vice President, I, Paul Gosar, from Arizona Speaker 2: What purpose does the gentleman from Arizona rise? Speaker 3: I rise both for myself and 60 of my colleagues to object To the, counting of the electoral ballots from Arizona. Speaker 2: Is the objection in writing and signed by a senator? Speaker 3: Yes, it is. Speaker 2: And I heard this week that president Trump said I had the right to overturned the election. President Trump is wrong. I had no right to overturn the election. The
January 6 - 2001 <> 2021 Gore <> Pence — Pence Could Have Sent it Back Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Despite what the Mockingbird Media says…. No Police Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Merrick Garland LIED! Officer Brian Sicknick was said to be killed by a violent mob, hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. That was a lie! Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick suffered 2 strokes and died the day after January 6th, the District’s chief medical examiner has ruled. The autopsy found no evidence of an allergic reaction to chemical irritants, external or internal injuries. Capitol Police officer Sicknick died of natural causes, 2 strokes due to a blood clot. The Four Other Officers oddly enough “committed suicide”, Some long after January 6. • Officer Kyle DeFreytag “Suicided” himself on July 10 • Officer Gunther Hashida “Suicided” himself at his home, found July 29. • Officer Howard Liebengood “suicided” himself on January 9 • Officer Jeffrey Smith “suicided” himself on January 15 https://www.fox5dc.com/news/fourth-police-officer-dies-by-suicide-after-capitol-riot-family-confirms This Video https://rumble.com/v2cb06e-january-6-merrick-garland-lied-no-officers-died-that-day.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer Brian Sicknick's cause of death remains uncertain, despite media claims that he was beaten to death by Trump supporters during the Capitol riot. Video evidence shows Sicknick walking through the building unharmed. However, the media and politicians like Liz Cheney continue to spread false information without correction or apology. The White House, including Press Secretary and Attorney General Merrick Garland, falsely claim that Sicknick and other officers were murdered during the riot. In reality, the other four officers mentioned died by suicide, with no evidence linking their deaths to the Republican mob. While some officers were assaulted, the claim that January 6th was the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War is unfounded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Consider the death of police officer Brian Sicknick. Now we still don't know exactly how officer Sicknick died. We're not certain that anyone does know. No one has explained it. But after reviewing the previously withheld video evidence, we can tell you with certainty that officer Cyknick was not beaten to death by Trump voters at the capitol. The tape shows very clearly Brian Sicknick walking through the building in apparent health after the media told us for 2 years that he had been murdered. So they were wrong about that. Okay, they got caught. Here's the interesting thing. They won't admit it. Liz Cheney's tweet is still on Twitter tonight. Officer Sicknick was killed defending our capital from the violent mob on January 6th. No correction. Anderson Cooper of CNN still has not apologized. Quote, Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight, he told us. Those are lies. So why not just admit it and move on? But they won't. In fact, this week, the White House trotted out both The press secretary and Joe Biden's attorney general, the attorney general of the United States, to claim not just that Brian Sicknick was actually murdered by Republicans at the capitol, but That other officers were murdered too. It's it's almost beyond belief. Watch this. Speaker 1: The right range of bipartisan lawmakers, as you heard Yesterday, you guys reported on it, who have condemned, this false depiction of the unprecedented violent attack on cons on our constitution and the rule of law, Which cost police police, officers their lives. Speaker 2: It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy, That power is peacefully transferred from 1 administration to another. Over a 100 officers were assaulted on that day. 5 officers died. Speaker 0: Five officers died on that day. Now that's just not some guy on Twitter. That's the attorney general of the United States. That's a man Whose honesty is central to his job. If you had a choice between IQ and integrity in an attorney general, of course, you would go with integrity because it's essential. But Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, is a liar. He just lied about something that is provably false. Who are these 5 officers who were, quote, killed that day? Notice he didn't tell you. No one ever tells you. No one ever shows you their autopsies. They don't want any detail. They just want the slogan. Now they're counting Brian Sicknick. That's a lie. But who are the other 4? Well, those are 4 officers who killed themselves after January 6th. In some cases, long after January 6th. But their suicides, we know for a fact, were the result of the Republican mob at the capitol. It's just it's just false. And it's not some esoteric fact. That fact is available to anyone who has Internet access. No police officers died that day on January 6th. None. Not one. Some were assaulted. That is true. And their assaults are indefensible. So how many were assaulted? Well, Garland said over a100. The government accountability office says the number is 114. We're just gonna roll with that. Don't know if it's true, but we'll take it at face value, and that is bad. We are opposed to assaulting police officers in any context. We said that On January 6, 2020, almost yet again, we're against that. But is January 6th the worst assault on the US government since the Civil War? That's insane. It's not even close.
Fourth police officer dies by suicide after Capitol riot, family confirms A fourth police officer who responded to the Capitol riot on Jan. 6 has died by suicide, according to his family. fox5dc.com
January 6: Merrick Garland LIED! No Officers Died That Day! NONE! Four “Committed Suicide” Some Long After J6 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

In hindsight, the deep state did one hell of a job and Pelosi was one hell of an actress. The power of the camera, when magnified, can depict any image one wants. That’s why it’s called Tell-A-Vision! Professional film crews, FBI & Aunt-Tifa to display & incite violence, her producer daughter was even there… I especially like the big ass X on the couch at the 3:09 mark, like it’s a marker for Nancy’s fat ass to sit. History will reflect January 6 as one of the greatest psyops ever performed on the American people…. Along with Covid. Follow me down the rabbit hole 🕳️ https://rumble.com/v2cky9w-january-6-pelosi-deserves-an-oscar-professional-film-crews.-find-the-x.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Capitol is under attack as people breach the doors and windows. Senators are in lockdown and putting on gas masks in preparation for a breach. They are requesting more security personnel and the National Guard has been called in. The concern for personal safety is high, with the blame placed on the president. There is a discussion about evacuating the Capitol and finding an alternative location to continue proceedings. It is mentioned that it may take days to clean up the damage. Official channels estimate that the situation will be resolved within an hour.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're still we're trying to get surrounded. They're taking the, north front scaffolding. We'll be in this. We'll get more ammunition. We're not gonna be able to hire them. The door has been breached, and people are gaining access into the capital. Speaker 1: We have got to get to finish the proceedings. Speaker 0: USA. USA. Speaker 2: Senator Schumer is at a secure location and they're locked down in the Senate. Speaker 1: There has to be some way we can maintain the Sense that people have that there is some security or some confidence That government can function and that we can elect the President of the United States. Did we go back into session? We did go back in succession. Speaker 2: But now apparently everybody on the floor is putting on to gas masks to prepare for a breach. I'm trying Speaker 1: to get more information, putting on their tear gas masks. Speaker 0: We need a area for the house members. They're all walking over now through the tunnel. Speaker 2: I'm gonna call up the effing secretary of DoD. We have some senators who are still in their hideaways that need massive personnel now. Can you Speaker 3: It's a Maryland National Guard to come to. Speaker 1: I have something to say, mister secretary. Well, I'm gonna call the the mayor of Washington DC right now and see what, other outreach she has other police department that's that your foreigner has mentioned. Hi, Governor. This is Nancy. Governor, I don't know if you had been approached about the Virginia National Guard. Mr. Hoyer was I was speaking to Governor Hogan, but I still think you probably need the okay of the The federal government in order to come into another jurisdiction? Speaker 2: Thank you. Oh, my gosh. Speaker 1: They're just breaking windows. They're doing all all kinds. It's really that somebody they said somebody was shot. It's just it's just horrendous and all at the instigation of the president of the United States. Okay. Thank you, governor. I appreciate what you're doing. And If Speaker 0: you don't Speaker 1: mind, I'd like to stay in touch. Thank you. Speaker 2: Okay. Thank you. Bye bye. Virginia Guard has been called in. Speaker 1: You're not just talking to governor Northam, And what he said is, they sent 200 of state police and a unit of the National Guard. They're breaking windows and going in, obviously, ransacking our offices and all the rest of that. That's nothing. The concern we have about personal harm. Personal safety is just Transcends everything, but the fact is on any given day, they're breaking the law in many different ways. And Quite frankly, much of it at the instigation of the president of the United States. And now, if if he could could at least, Somebody. Speaker 2: Yeah. Why don't you get the president to tell them to leave the capital, mister attorney general, and your law enforcement responsibility, A public statement they should all leave. This cannot be just we're waiting for so and so. We need them there now, whoever you got. You have had you also have troops. This is steady hoyer. Speaker 1: Okay. So we have a to make that decision. Speaker 2: Andrews Air Force Base. Alright. Other military bases. Thank you. We need active duty, National Guard. How soon in the future can you have the place evacuated, the clothing cleaned out? Speaker 0: I I don't wanna speak for the leadership that's going to be responsible for in executing the Speaker 1: Or the hotel or some other entity that was under siege. And let me say you can logistically get people there. Imagine make the front. How we can get this job done today. You talked to Mitch about it earlier. He's not in the room right now, but he was with us earlier And said we want to expedite this and hope that they could confine to just 1 complaint, Arizona, and then we could vote and that would be, front. Then just move forward with the rest of the state. The overriding wish is to do it at the capital. What we are being told very directly is It's going to take days for the capital to be okay again. We've gotten a very bad report about the condition I would go to the house floor with defecation and all that kind of thing as well. I don't think that that's hard to clean up. But I do think it is more from a security standpoint of making sure that everybody is out of the building and how long will that take. I just got off the device president. Speaker 2: And I got off with the vice president elect. Okay. Speaker 1: But what we left the conversation with, because he said, I had the impression from Mitch that Mitch wants everybody back to do it there. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: I said, well, we're getting a counterpoint that It could take time to clean up the poo poo that they're making all over the room literally and figuratively in the capital and that but it may take days to get back. Speaker 0: And so I'm at the Capitol building. I'm literally standing with, the chief of of the US Capitol Police. Can you just inform me what you will hear through official channels? Paul Irving, your Sergeant and Arms will inform you that their best information is that they believe that, the New house and the senate will be able, to read the fee in roughly an hour. Speaker 2: Good news.
January 6: Pelosi Deserves an Oscar— Professional Film Crews. Find the X Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Even Nancy Pelosi’s daughter believes the J6 narrative was complete horseshit. 2:43 Pelosi: “The Shaman did noth(ing)… What did the Shaman do? He stood there.” 4:24 “After the Democrats lose the house, then they get rid of the committee, people may lose I think interest… no one is going to care after the democrats are out of power. And you take Biden out of office- then who cares!?” 4:47 “DC is a lot of people who work for the government. I don’t think they’re sympathetic. If you got it moved (changed trial jurisdiction from DC) you’d totally get off” (laughs while saying this) 6:48 “If there was an insurrection… you were supposed to have a plan!” “It was the sorriest insurrection in history” 8:09 “You’re going to be able to laugh about this one day” 14:50 Pelosi talks about her friendship with Gavin McInnes and laughs at the notion that Proud Boys are white supremacists. https://rumble.com/v29wdt4-bombshell-nancy-pelosis-daughter-caught-on-tape-refuting-the-j6-narrative.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their plans to attend an event and bring a camera. They talk about getting on a list and filling out a form for information. They mention a lawyer and question whether he got a good or bad deal. They discuss the possibility of an appeal and the potential for a longer sentence. They mention the shaman's sentence and criticize the disparity in sentencing. They talk about the upcoming trial and the potential for bias in the jury. They mention the difficulty of moving the trial and discuss a woman who got a DUI and caused a fatal accident. They mention receiving threats and the involvement of the FBI. They briefly mention their connection to Gavin McGinnis and the comical nature of the Proud Boys.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So how am I gonna get in? I need to know what we Speaker 1: Only will be Can you is there a Speaker 0: Oh, he needs to put you on the list. Yeah. But the problem is is that I wanna go with a camera. I will put you on the list. I will make some contacts, and I will try to camera? I'm thinking of maybe Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm the camera guy because I want to meet him too. Hey. I'm gonna need the camera guy. Speaker 0: You need to get information. They have copy of this? There's a form. There's a form you can fill. I'll get you the information. I'll get you the terms. Thank you. Speaker 2: You're welcome. Speaker 0: Now do you know anything about his, First of all, do you think that he's a, no. Do you think that he got good deal or bad deal? Speaker 1: I don't know. A I'm gonna Speaker 2: say He's the one who got The lawyer went away? Speaker 1: Yes. The lawyers. Alright. Okay. Speaker 0: Let me tell you what happened. He okay. His lawyer, Patrick got it. Right? So he was in reserves. Old guy. Old guy. He is a lawyer, but he's also in the reserves. Speaker 2: Right. Right. Speaker 0: And he also is very very religious. So what he does when you come in, let's say you're the client. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: The first thing he does Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And blah blah blah. All that. So then, he says you have to do god wants you to make right. You go right to the judge, tell him you did everything, thing? And just and and just face the music, period. So he did that, but then he got a new lawyer who I have not talked to because I'm not sure I trust the new lawyer. Because, first of all, he's he gets out May 18th. Is the lawyer gonna be able to get Before then? I mean, it's already January. February. Conviction. Yeah. Was there anyone a conviction? Yeah. Speaker 2: But you know, you could appeal it. Like, I mean, then it comments, like, you're not gonna make the felon? You could still you still have status to appeal. You Speaker 0: can give an appeal. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. You win the appeal overturning. So he gets some incentive. Yeah. Like Speaker 0: So some days, did the shaman do? He stood there. What Speaker 2: I told Speaker 0: him, he stood there. The shaman got how many months? Speaker 2: Right. 41. Speaker 0: Book to get bigger? Like, people are criticizing some of Speaker 2: the people Speaker 0: that Right. Right. A lot of people were getting probation and stuff. So I think they're looking to make People like, I think if Paul went now, he'd get a bigger a longer sentence. Speaker 2: What what did he do? Okay. What did he do? He went He Speaker 0: just walked me with the trunk flag in the sand? Speaker 2: That's it. That's it. Speaker 0: That's it. I need that. So I don't know if the balance was was good or bad. Speaker 1: Well, for the charge I'm looking from a charging point of view of 15.12. Speaker 0: See, you didn't walk into that. You walk me into the settings. Speaker 1: But I didn't do event? Speaker 0: I know. That's what I'm saying. That's the bad thing. Speaker 1: I wasn't even there to say it. A lot of these people are like, we're here to overturn the I wasn't even there for that reason. I was not there to overturn anything. Speaker 2: I I think a thing about it? He used him to to shore up their 15 12 charge too. Because if they have people fleeing to it, they're telling the judge is good. We already have people who pledge this felony. So though? If you overturn it for 1 case, you're gonna overturn all the prior conditions. It puts more pressure on these district judges not to over return in? Because he's, oh, we have Paul. He's gonna plead guilty to the 15/12. But they dropped everything but the 15/12. The charge they never used before. A so they're like, oh, this guy will take 8 months. And we'll we'll have another plea. They make every single person charged with the 15/12, plead a difference between 12? I was thinking to drop it. Speaker 0: I'm very Speaker 1: interested on the 1st Speaker 0: trial, how Speaker 1: that's gonna look like. Well, I think Speaker 0: the one thing, if you drag it out, chance? It's like anniversary. The first one is a big deal. They're gonna really be a big deal in your state. No one's gonna care after the Democrats are a power. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm gonna do that. Speaker 1: The jury that's Speaker 0: The jury is The jury is Speaker 2: We we need to see how there. Well, if Speaker 0: you guys wanted to totally shut off. I I wish you push at all? I'm waiting for them to successfully move it? Speaker 2: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard the hearings. Speaker 1: The logos deleted me. Speaker 2: Those if they're gonna say They're gonna say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. And then it is very the last time the government move to trial with the Oklahoma City bomber? They agreed to move into Colorado. So that's a stipulated. Even the Boston bomber case, which just now an appeal to Boston the city of Boston or the federal judge here? What do you mean it can't be fair? Motion gets signed by the judge They say yes. Yes. Speaker 1: But then but but Speaker 2: there might be more favorable up the line? You know, we go to the I'm not using DC Circuit of Appeals to the Supreme Court. They might say, wait a second. You're you have politicians Speaker 0: every night comparing it to Pearl Harbor. 9/11. That was just deep. Speaker 2: Looking at the variant to Pearl Harbor 911 And that was just deep Deeps are under siege. Had natural budget for 7 months. If you live there, you're like, I am under siege. I see natural guardsmen around here? You know, my my city was attacked. The local the local media everyday. You can't have a fair trial. Speaker 0: Well, the reason see, I think gonna remember January 6th. Right now, people are still looking for stupid. We need stuff to fill. I mean, if you watch 6.47. As time goes on Right. It's gonna be less. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: And as as as So I think I think also people are gonna lose their their office the jobs. The people that were there for Lucerne Johnson, it's not gonna need anything if you weren't even there. I know we Speaker 2: need, like, a word breakout. Speaker 0: No. No. It's right at all. Okay. I I I thank you for your time. Listen, I really, Speaker 2: typical bad guy? Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan? Is that if there was If there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line, Martin. You're in the military. You know? Right? Speaker 1: No. It doesn't. Speaker 0: There was no plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. So you're offering a you sit down overnight with your soldiers. You go over. Alright? You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this site. At this time, we're gonna take over this. There's none of that. Speaker 2: He's doing the impression. He's a sorry in his direction in in the 20 21st century ever. It's no guns. Speaker 1: A guy's playing. A guy's fucking behind you on Speaker 0: I love the guy. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm like I'm like Speaker 0: Well, we do that. We could just do it after last week for the guy that just was ringing Speaker 1: Well, my favorite my favorite guy holding Speaker 0: Mister Webb? Speaker 1: He got no. Speaker 0: He he he got it. Speaker 2: He's dead. He's dead. Speaker 1: I'll wait for a sentence. He's right. Yeah. Speaker 0: Well, what's he gonna get? Speaker 2: Probably in a few months. I don't know. I'm not sure right now. We'll just go, you know, from this You're Speaker 0: gonna be able to laugh about this one Then I would just wait. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Because I wouldn't the 1st child, like, this I was in Ohio with this guy who is going to file? He wants to subpoena Trump and make it, like, this whole it's for, like I Speaker 1: heard it. No. Speaker 0: They're not gonna they're not gonna It's gonna be You're not Speaker 2: gonna allow that. You're not gonna name? Is the district Speaker 1: judge I just want a subpoena people involved with my team. For example, that officer that I gave water, the guy that interviewed me Probably, maybe 1 more person. But other than that, I want people You Speaker 2: can find him, officer Lopez? Speaker 0: Yeah. Let's find him. Speaker 2: You should find him. I mean, he's If Speaker 0: you have the name, you can find him. Speaker 2: Officer little bit? We we found some stuff on. He's from, like, Speaker 1: Coachella? California? California? Speaker 0: From the place of concert center? Yeah. Yeah. That's I'll find it for you. Speaker 2: Yeah. That's Somebody told me, like, oh, he's Coachella guy. And I was like, is he the constant? Like, no. He's from the city. Oh. Oh. Oh. He has a catalog? He has a different Local Coachella News did a thing about bit about it? Because he got some award or something to be in capital at in the capital police in that day. But he's the one in the video where he's offering him water. And he looks shell shop? Yeah. That's why I was trying to he did Look. Speaker 0: I look for him. I look for him. Speaker 1: I did a comment, so I know that being his buddy's trying to talk to me. He's like Yeah. Speaker 0: Clipped since all we're like and, can I tell you that story? Yeah. So her condition was she took home in front of her wall the Nancy Pelosi office of the speaker sign. Oh, yeah. So she was one of the people I wanted to get to really early because know that that if I went to something like that and I took something long from my wall, I know that it It's a memento and not a step. Right. Right. Right. I knew. She's 21 years old. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: Right. This is not Right. What they're making it seem. Speaker 2: Right. Mhmm. Speaker 0: So I had lunch with her at her country club. And I was like, so what were you doing there? She's like this. Well, like, I think I went from Missouri before. Barely finished this, like, farm Right. Works on a farm. So what do you do for a lover from a family farm? I was like, and they're turning her like, public enemy number 1. And she's the most, like, almost almost you must feel sad that she's so Luckily, she has the lawyer, and the lawyer got it down. I mean, they walked to her bedroom and this whole thing on the wall. Right? So you think, oh, she's gonna go down. Got a misdemeanor. Nothing nothing nothing. And we're walking to get probation. But on the night of the anniversary of January 6th, She's drunk in a bar. Speaker 1: She got a DUI? Speaker 0: And got killed a mother. Speaker 2: Oh, she killed them. That's right. Speaker 0: And it's clear. Mistake? And now I'm just because I know her. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: What happened was when the local news starts to your guys in the army. Yeah. They they took shit. And she's like a 21 year old farm girl. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So she I mean, it wasn't really her her nature, I think, to meet her. Anyway, way was treated her way to whisper the matter in the country club. She's got Speaker 2: You got DUI mask on. Speaker 0: Charged her yet because they haven't got in touch with college or Speaker 1: with sports medicine. Uh-huh. Speaker 0: And I was with her Monday, and she said, I don't even remember any of it. And then She got she herself got, Like, like, blacked out. She was blacked out the whole time. Doesn't remember any of it. Speaker 1: And who who did she kill? Speaker 0: Or The mother. She killed them. Her unknown problem, honey. Speaker 2: She rode against traffic Speaker 0: for 6 miles. 6 miles at 60 miles an hour. And she She doesn't remember anything. Into a Speaker 2: car and this woman who was sitting next to her husband who drove husband in the hospital right diet? Speaker 1: I I heard a bug on a lie later. No. Speaker 0: But that's an example of, like, chance If you go deep, if you're really a deep it's like that's an example of, like, the kind of damage that I need. You can say, oh, we need this and shoot me fairly and they're full of shit. That's fine. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: But, like, it's not ruining your life. This has ruined her life. Mhmm. And Junior 6 was like a blip. Oh, no. But there's attention from it. Right. Right. It's free Speaker 1: traffic. Yeah. Speaker 0: They're cool. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Because it takes a lot of time too? Speaker 1: No. But it not I don't mean just the the words itself, but when you have people implement I have people calling from I have nothing to do with my business. They're stealing bad reviews on my website saying, oh, it's erection disorder. I had my secretary that's scared of going to work because she's saying Wait. Speaker 2: Hold on, hon. It's not a bad need Speaker 0: to have so I can move Speaker 2: my life or Well, you got the powder too. I got it. Speaker 1: I had maybe what's on? Like, like, the anthrax. Speaker 2: I think, yeah, we had to call out the the cops, the ups Speaker 0: the Why do people why it could be it was so weird. Speaker 2: People are so weird. And it tested positive. The first test And so And they said that somebody who knows what they're doing made sure that the the first test, it'll test positive, like a like a field test. It'll pass that until they do the actual chemical. A like, it was very premeditated. It and have, like, a letter, like, to a oh, probably I didn't get Speaker 1: a watch down and pass message. Speaker 2: In reference the the beep? Oh, no. You're thinking too loudly now. How do you like this? Speaker 1: I opened the letter. I went to work. I thought it was a pump bill or something. And when I opened my diaper, I just went like that. White powder came out. I was thinking already. Alright. Anthrax or something like that. Who knows? Crazy people. Speaker 2: And the FBI guy shows up and they're and they were they were more like it's almost like they were more interested in searching his office. You know, we were like, we didn't even trust them because they were like using it like, oh, who is he? And then we had to get the postal inspector out there to try and, like, who it was like a jurisdictional thing. Yeah. Speaker 1: It was Speaker 2: it was a mess. Speaker 1: Yeah. My employees I have about a Twenty employees. They're worried. Speaker 0: Don't you just an outstanding member of society? Okay. Do they talk about that in the court? No. Of course a That's interesting. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, no. Speaker 2: I've heard nothing wrong with that. At the trial, they will. At the trial, yeah. Status hearings is Speaker 1: very Yeah. But they're gonna probably gonna call me by supremacists. As a matter of fact, I I want it in Spanish. That was my first language. Speaker 2: So That would be fine. Speaker 1: I wanna interpreter for my next question? Speaker 0: Okay. So I want you to know that I'm from New York City, and I am was always a long time real friends with Gavin McGinnis, who supposedly got it started Speaker 2: with Brad Boys. Yes. Speaker 0: And he when you say this is a drinking club, I'm just telling you guys, I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know who Gavin is. I went on road trips with them to parties. Mhmm. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, time? This is, like, years ago, they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. 16. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may take he may touch it, but so that's why it's funny to me. Speaker 1: Yeah. Like I said, we'll sit around the table or call each other. Hey. Where do you wanna meet up? Can you figure out where to go eat? And it's like No. Speaker 0: I know I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, and I was just like so I just want you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people. I'm like,
BOMBSHELL! Nancy Pelosi’s Daughter Caught on Tape REFUTING the J6 Narrative! NEVER BEFORE SEEN VIDEO: Nancy Pelosi’s Filmmaker Daughter Alexandra Pelosi Caught on Tape REFUTING J6 NARRATIVE – Admitting Jan. 6 Protests Not an Insurrection, DC Courts Too Biased Read the breakdow rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

The J6 Committee lied about what happened as tapes were eventually released by Tucker Carlson. This tape overturns the single most powerful political lie democrats have used regarding J6. It gets even better… The J6 committee KNEW Brian Sitnick was alive and well after he was supposedly “murdered” by Trump supporters. The investigators working on behalf of the J6 committee saw this footage & electronically bookmarked the this tape, but it never saw the light of day… until Tucker Carlson. https://rumble.com/v2c0y5c-january-6-new-video-shatters-narrative-on-police-officer-brian-sitnick-deat.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, there were claims of a deadly insurrection at the Capitol, but the video evidence shows otherwise. While some violence occurred, the majority of the chaos was peaceful. The media falsely reported that Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by the mob, but surveillance footage shows him walking in the Capitol unharmed. This contradicts the narrative that he was murdered by Trump supporters. The January 6th committee had access to this footage but chose not to release it, as it would undermine their political agenda. The truth about what happened that day is being concealed for political gain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within hours of January 6th, literally hours, you began to hear that day described as a deadly insurrection, not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician, but in unison by all of them. Almost like it was coordinated, a deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves it was neither an insurrection nor deadly. Here it is. Dis January 6th, when an estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building, causing the deaths of 5 police officers. Speaker 1: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001, And January 6th. The mob beat officers with anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher. Diss Police officers died. Speaker 0: Donald Trump supporters who, of course, rioted and killed police officers. By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day. They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand, into a single emotionally related political slogan, which they repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th, they said, was a deadly insurrection. There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up. He incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 1: Incited a deadly insurrection. Speaker 2: The violent deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months just Go. It was about white supremacy in my view. Speaker 0: A deadly insurrection. Everything about that phrase is a lie. Very little about January 6th was organized were violent. Surveillance video from inside the Capitol shows mostly peaceful chaos, but the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it. To prove the insurrection was deadly, just began disappointed to the death of an officer called Brian Sicknick. The mob killed officer Brian Sicknick. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years. They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnek was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Cichnek died after being hit in the head with a fire distinguish her during the fight. That story came from the New York Times, which is effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media. It was a lie, untrue in any way. But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it. Speaker 1: The New York Times has dis Quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick. Speaker 0: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself, a Trump disorder, had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the left. His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Sicknick's body lay in state in the capital rotunda, where a parade of the politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden. Speaker 2: Breaking down the doors, trying to overturn an outcome of election, And killing several police officers in the meantime. Speaker 0: But Brian Cygnik should not be reduced to a prop for the political ambitions of the Democratic Party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter, including how he died. To this day, media accounts describe Sicknick as someone who was, quote, slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie. Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capital after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside. By all appearances, Sicknick is healthy and vigorous. He's wearing a helmet, so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie the Democrats have told us about January 6th, dis and it was indeed a lie. The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally through just after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters, and they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage which contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system. That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party he reviewed this tape. They saw it, but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why? Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth disturb their political interests. They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do
January 6: New Video Shatters Narrative on how Police Officer Brian Sickick Died! The J6 Committee KNEW & Ignored it! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

The best person to talk to on law enforcement side would be the Capitol Police Chief… but for some reason he was silenced… Fox News Deleted this Scene from Tucker Carlson’s Interview with the Capitol Police Chief “Leaks” Saying, “It was a Cover Up!” Why would Fox News delete this scene? “If people were reporting to intelligence correctly. If I was allowed to do my job as the chief, we wouldn’t be here. Then seeing how, you’re lambasted in public & everything appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information and intelligence they had, the military had, it’s all watered down. I’m not getting intelligence, I’m denied any support from National Guard in advance. I’m denied National Guard while we’re under attack, for 71 minutes…” https://rumble.com/v34749c-january-6-fox-news-deletes-capitol-police-chief-saying-it-was-a-cover-up.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration at not being allowed to testify at a Senate hearing and believes that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the events of January 6th could have been prevented. They question whether there was a deliberate attempt to hide intelligence and suggest that it may have been part of a larger plan. The speaker also discusses how the events have benefited the Democratic Party but believes it is a violation of the constitution. They emphasize the importance of a fair legal system and express concern that it is no longer perceived as such.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very restrained and rational and not give a statement, obviously, but the facts that you're describing are shocking. Speaker 1: The reason why I've had a lot of people ask me, you know, why did you write this book? I try to do what I can to get the truth out. Yes. You know, they didn't want me to testify in, in February February 23rd at the senate hearing. They don't want people that's still In positions, I actually had to go in and talk to a friend of mine on one of the oversight committees say, I will come there in person. I want to be there. I want to testify. So I'm glad you think I'm reserved. I'm, you know, to be honest with you, I'm a little pissed off, because If if people were reporting intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, I got a significant experience. I was allowed to do my job as chief, We wouldn't be here today. This didn't happen. Then see how, you know, you're out there, you're land based in public, and it's all you know, everything Appears to be a cover up. Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information intelligence that it had, military had, it's all watered down. I'm not getting intelligence. I'm denied support National Guard in advance. I'm denied National Guard while we're under attack for 71 minutes. You're in a fight? Yeah. A fight for a couple of minutes. Speaker 0: Yeah. 1 you out. 1 minute. Speaker 1: I was gonna say, 60 seconds, 3 minutes. Hey. Let me tell you. It wears you out. My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before the the protesters Wait. Speaker 0: Can I say so you describe this as a failure to get the intelligence people who needed it? But it sounds like worse than it sounds like they were hiding the intelligence. Speaker 1: And that's what I'm getting at is Could there possibly be that actually did something happen and kinda wanted something happen? It doesn't it's not a far stretch to begin. Speaker 0: I don't know what the other explanation is. Speaker 1: It's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out. It gets concerning what was our end goal. You look at look at what's happening. Was that their end goal? I don't know. Speaker 0: Well, I mean, there's no question that what happened on January 6th as really helped the Democratic Party. It's bravely politicized the U. S. Military And the intelligence agencies and the FBI, and those are all, I think, bad for America and violations of The constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party. That's the fact. Like, that's what happened. Speaker 1: Absolutely. And I I write about that because As a cop of 30 years, I'm I'm a rule of law type of guy. Yeah. You know, there's a reason that Lady Justice is depicted with a blindfold. As soon as you cut that blindfold off, the fairness of our legal system goes out goes out the window. And that is exactly what has happened. They have stripped up blindfold away from Lady Justice, And there no. It's not perceived as being fair anymore.
January 6 - Fox News Deletes Capitol Police Chief Saying it was a Cover Up in Tucker Carlson Interview Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

After Tucker Carlson was Freed from Fox… he interviewed, then Capitol Police Chief, Steve Sund again… this time no filters. Four Clips. Four Breakdowns. Intelligence Failures, They Knew, Pelosi & McConnell were in On It. Nancy Pelosi Withheld the National Guard CLIP 1 January 6 - Former Capital Police Chief Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From FBI Steve D’Antuono, Chris Miller & General Milley A senate report talks about multiple emails that were circulating just days prior to January 6, talking about the violence they were anticipating at the Capital. Steve Sund had a video call with FBI Steve D’Antuono prior to J6 and there were no mentions of violence. Here’s where it gets weird… The then Secretary of Defense, Chris Miller, along with General Milley both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC, because “they were worried about violence” & revoking permits on Capital Hill. “You know who issues the permits on Capital Hill for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn’t told? Me.” On January 4th, Chris Miller puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, although internally they were expecting violence. 🤔 This action also affected the National Guard of Virginia & Maryland from being allowed to respond at first. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36droa-january-6-steve-sund-wasnt-told-about-key-intelligence-over-concerns-of-vio.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Steve Sund- General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, Kept it from the Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress An investigative reporter from The Washington Post discovered General Milley was using an intelligence platform called DataMinr to come across intelligence on his own. “He’s picking up intelligence talking about killing members of Congress & attacking the Capital, and he’s not telling me. He’s telling select members of Congress That’s concerning as hell!” This Clip https://rumble.com/v36dyu3-january-6-steve-sund-general-milley-had-intelligence-of-violence-and-murder.html CLIP 3 January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on it! They Denied Capital Police Chief Steve Sund with Federal Assistance TWICE Tucker: This was handled very difference— by whom? Steve Sund: 1. By the intelligence agencies 2. By the Military “Congress passed a law that requires me to go the Sergeant of Arms (Capital Police Board) in advance of an event to request Federal Resources such as the National Guard. I was denied Twice, by the Sargent of Arms Paul D. Irving & Sargent of Arms Michael Conrad Stenger who BOTH resigned January 7, 2021.” WHO DO THEY WORK FOR? Nancy Pelosi on the House Side. Mitch McConnel on the Senate Side. Notice Tucker was fishing for just this answer. BOOM! This Video https://rumble.com/v36e4ue-january-6-nancy-pelosi-and-mitch-mcconnell-denied-steve-sund-federal-assist.html CLIP 4 January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard “I’m the only Chief of Police that in the United States that has a law to bring in the National Guard” 12:58pm “I make my first call to the Sargent of Arms Paul Irving, requesting a Declaration of Emergency & bring in the military & Federal resources.” Paul Irving Responds: “I’ll run it up the Chain, I’ll get back to you.” —> Nancy Pelosi Paul Irving “didn’t have to run it up the chain (Pelosi) because it was an emergency, but he wouldn’t grant authorization. “My next call was over to Mike Stenger. Mike Stenger Responded: What did Paul tell you? Let’s wait to hear from Paul. 71 minutes go by & I make 32 calls. 71<>17 “The first people to offer assistance was the United States Secret Service. By law, I shouldn’t have requested their assistance until I had approval. But I’m looking at my men & women having their added handed to them, and my first thought was F*ck it! I will take whatever discipline there is.” That’s the one text the Secret Service turned over after they “lost all their texts” 🤔 2:09pm 71 minutes later, Steve Sund is finally given approval for the National Guard This Clip https://rumble.com/v36ec9w-january-6-71-minutes-to-get-federal-assistance.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Steve D'Antwono, the FBI director, received multiple emails warning about the violence expected at the Capitol before January 6th, but nothing was mentioned during a video call with him. The military had discussed locking down Washington DC and revoking permits on Capitol Hill due to concerns about violence. However, on January 4th, the acting secretary of defense issued a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying weapons or equipment for crowd control. This decision hindered the National Guard's response when assistance was desperately needed on January 6th. Governor Hogan even pleaded for help but was denied due to the memo. The situation doesn't make sense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Steve D'Antwono, who's the Washington field office, FBI director, you look at the GAO report that came out February of this year, it talks about, multiple emails. It's a GAO report or maybe no, it's a Senate report that just came out, in July, just last month, talks about multiple emails going to Steve D'Antwonio on Sunday, Monday and some probably Tuesday, just the days before, talking about the violence that they're predicting coming up to the capital. And I have a video call with him on that Tuesday and nothing said about it. I mean, that's not a word, not a word. Speaker 1: So not to repeat myself, but that does not make sense. Speaker 0: It doesn't. It doesn't. Especially when you think about think about this, the military, the United States military, and this gets really convoluted once you get into the bonds on January 6 and how I was delayed getting resources. You have the United States military, secretary of defense or acting secretary of defense Miller enacting and, General Milley had both discussed locking down the city of Washington DC because they were so worried about violence at the capitol on January 6th Sunday and Monday, they had been discussing locking down the city, revoking permits on Capitol Hill because of the concern for violence. You know who issues the permits on Capitol Hills for demonstrations? I do. You know who wasn't told? Me. Instead, on January 4th, what does Miller deal. He puts out a memo restricting the National Guard from carrying various weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense. Speaker 1: Wait. Wait. So The military says we're so concerned about potential imminent violence that we are considering shutting down the city. But at the very same time, they decide that the National Guard can't adopt an aggressive posture. Speaker 0: Right. Right. They're deploying because they're going to be deploying National regard to assist in Washington DC with crowd control at metros and some of the traffic, control areas. But they put this out on January 4th, specific to January 5th 6th, and this direction affected the National Guard in Virginia and Maryland. When I was calling begging for assistance on January 6th, they weren't allowed to respond at first. Look at, governor Hogan. He did a press conference saying he was begging to respond and he was not being denied by the Pentagon, all because of the memo.
Video Transcript AI Summary
General Milley, the military's top officer, has been accused of using an intelligence platform called Data Miner to uncover information about potential threats to the United States Capitol and members of Congress. However, he allegedly failed to inform everyone who should have been notified, including the speaker. This raises concerns about the duty to warn and the need for necessary action to be taken. The details were revealed by investigative reporter Carol Leonning in her book.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Begging to respond and who is not being denied by the Pentagon all because of the memo. So why? You begin to wonder why and especially when you look at things like something that I recently came across, when you talk about the military. General Milley, we're now finding out, and it's not for me, this is from Carol Leonning, investigative reporter with The Washington Post, Has found that he was using Data Miner on his own coming across intelligence Tell us what Data Miner is. So Data Miner is an intelligence platform. It's not something your average citizen would have on their A computer. I I guess it goes in and does crawling across webs. I'm not really sure how it works. Yes. But it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform. He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of congress and attacking the United States Capitol, and he's not telling me. He's telling select members of congress. I mean, Carol Wenning writes about it in her book. That's concerning as hell because as the chief of police, you know, he there's a duty to warn there, and I should be told so I can take the necessary action. I don't know who else he was telling, but he sure wasn't telling me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the handling of the event was different from previous situations. They mention that the decision was made by the intelligence agency and the military. According to a federal law, the speaker was required to request federal resources like the National Guard in advance from the Capitol Police Board. However, they were denied twice due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The decision was made by Paul Irving and Mike Stenger, who work for Pelosi and McConnell respectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Big picture, just to restate, you've seen many things like this. And as you just said, this was very different. This was handled very differently. By whom? Speaker 1: By by the intelligence. I'd say 1 by the intelligence agency, 2 by the military. So the reason why I say the military, think of this, By federal law. You know, congress passed a law that that requires me to go to the 2 to the Sergeant Arms Capitol Police Board In advance of an event and to request, federal resources such as the National Guard. So congress passed a law. It's 2 US code 1970. Look it up. Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on the 6th? That requires me to go and get approval For bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance, I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from congressional leadership in advance like I did on January 3rd. I'm denied twice Because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it. So think about that. Speaker 0: May I ask you who made that decision? Who denied you? Speaker 1: I was denied by Paul Irving, House Sergeant Arms, and also Mike Stenger, senate sergeant arms. And who do they On January 3rd Speaker 0: Who do they work for? Speaker 1: It would have been working for Pelosi on the house side, that Pelosi was the number one boss And then McConnell on the Senate side.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, who is the chief of police, expresses frustration over the law that prevents them from bringing in the national guard without approval. They recount the events of the attack on the Capitol and their efforts to request assistance. They made multiple calls to different agencies, including the sergeant in arms and the chairman of the Capitol Police Board, but authorization was delayed for 71 minutes. Finally, at 2:09, they received approval and immediately informed their colleague. The speaker emphasizes their anger and marks the time as 2:10 when they finally got approval for the National Guard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Capitol Police Board I mean, it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me, not just regulations, rules that say I gotta go and need approval to bring in the national guard, a law. So that's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergencies. So think of this. Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the national guard to be brought in. I have 340 national guard that have been activated. At least a 150 to a 180 of are in the city, many of them within eyesight of the capital. Okay? We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I called the Washington DC Police Department. I their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll. Thank god I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU, platoons up there. Called him and said, hey. Please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they they came to their west front and they started attacking, it was gonna be bad. 12/58, I make my 1st call to the sergeant in arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad. We need assistance. I need a declaration of emergency. I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources. I'm told by Paul Irving quote, I'm gonna run up the chain. I'll get back to you. Speaker 1: The chain is Pelosi. Speaker 0: The chain is his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The the law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he'd run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stenger. He's the now with the chairman of the Capitol Police Board. Told them the same thing. We're getting our asses handed to us on the left front. I need federal resources. He said, what did Paul tell you? Said he's run up the chain. Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So for the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center. I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law, you know, one of the first people to offer assistance was United States Secret Service. And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval, but I'm looking at my men and women having their asses handed to them. And and my first thought was fuck it. I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the 1 tech secret service turned over. You know how they lost all their texts? Yes. It's the text between their, chief chief Sullivan and myself. Thank god for him. Speaker 1: I don't so can we just so you make this call immediately Immediately. To the house sergeant in arms who reports mister Irving who reports to Nancy Pelosi. He says I'll call Pelosi. Speaker 0: He says I'm a run it up the chain. Speaker 1: Run it up the chain, but that is the chain. Speaker 0: Not here. Not here. I got you. I'm just I wanna tell you exactly what Speaker 1: you mean. What happens then? Does he get back to you? Speaker 0: So for the next 71 minutes, I make the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies. 11 of those calls are follow-up calls. And look in the the senate combined report from from 2001. They have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call. 11 times I call, and the next several minutes going, where are we on the approval? Where are we in the approval? Just any minute now. Any minute I'm gonna get in any minute. Finally, at 209, 71 minutes later, 209, I'm finally given approval. Think about that. 71 minutes later, I immediately called Mike Stenger, said we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made sure that this watch commander, I'm in the command center. I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant that's my watch commander. I said, John, mark the time as 2/10. I finally got approval for the National Guard. I was that mad
January 6 - Steve Sund Wasn’t Told About Key Intelligence over Concerns of Violence From Chris Miller & General Miller Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - General Milley Had Intel on Plans to Kill Members of Congress & Attack the Capital, But Didn’t Share it with The Capital Police Chief, only Select Members of Congress Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Nancy Pelosi & Mitch McConnell Were in on It! Denied Steve Sund Federal Assistance Twice Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - For 71 Minutes Nancy Pelosi Refused to Bring in the National Guard Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Four More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They don’t want to get to the bottom of J6 • They Did Not Want The Capitol Police Chief to Testify • Nancy Pelosi was Off Limits & wasn’t allowed to be investigated • The Pentagon Call & the Set Up CLIP 1 When the Former Capital Police Chief who was there on January 6 says “it doesn’t seem like people want to get to the bottom of J6” That alone says everything. https://rumble.com/v36eiub-january-6-steve-sund-it-doesnt-seem-like-people-want-to-get-to-the-bottom-o.html CLIP 2 January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify “I fought to testify, they didn’t want me to testify in the Senate Hearing. When they first put out the notice, it was for only current employees that were still in place. - This would exclude Paul Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi. - It would have excluded Mike Stenger, who reports to Mitch McConnell. It would have excluded, Steve Sund, the Capital Police Chief. ….All The key people at the top of the security apparatus who would know the answers to the key questions. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36emna-january-6-they-didnt-want-the-chief-of-capital-police-to-testify-in-the-j6-.html CLIP 3 Oh Snaps 👀 January 6 - Democrat Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was “OFF LIMITS” for any Inquiry into January 6 “When they were talking about the the January 6 Committee coming out, I think it was Representative Bennie Thompson that said, Speaker Pelosi was OFF LIMITS… So they wouldn’t get any of her records, her phone records, and any inquiries into January 6.” OH BOY! I hope to God Trump uses his Subpoena Power on that evil WITCH! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36etwx-january-6-bennie-thompson-said-nancy-pelosi-was-off-limits-for-inquiry-into.html CLIP 4 January 6 - Steve Sund - The Pentagon Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - Tucker “It Sounds like a Set-Up!” Verrry Interesting… 2:34pm “I get a notification to get on a call with the US Pentagon. I have to sell my request for the National Guard. I’m on the call with a Lieutenant [Walter] Piatt, and General [Charles] Flynn… and it was mainly General Piatt that I’m speaking with. **I’m assuming it’s Charles Flynn given I don’t know any other active General with the name Flynn. Interesting he’s on this call. 🤔 Piatt’s Response: “I don’t like the optics of the National Guard on Capital Hill.” “While I’m begging for assistance, The Pentagon sent in resources to guard General’s houses to protect their homes & not the [US Capital]. So you begin to think, it seems a little conspiratorial. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but I can see where somebody can begin to go down that rabbit hole.” 🕳️.. . … 🐇 All people & agencies involved all came to the same conclusion that they were not going to protect the US Capital. This Video https://rumble.com/v36fd1n-january-6-steve-sund-call-with-walter-piatt-and-general-flynn-it-sounds-lik.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expressed confusion about the lack of answers regarding two significant events on January 6. Firstly, other federal agencies withheld crucial information from the speaker, who was in charge of security at the Capitol. Secondly, despite the situation escalating for 71 minutes, Speaker Pelosi denied permission to bring in the National Guard. The speaker questioned why there is a lack of investigation into these matters, suggesting a lack of interest in uncovering the truth. The situation is described as worsening beyond these events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't understand. So we I don't they were only 10 minutes into this, and you've told me 2 things. 1, the other federal agencies withheld critical information from you in charge of security at the capital before January 6. And once it started and things got out of control for 71 minutes, Pelosi refused to allow you to bring in the National Guard. So those are just those are 2 of the biggest questions from January 6. And my question is, why don't we have answers to why that happened? It doesn't seem like people really want to get to the bottom of it. It really it really doesn't. And it just gets worse. It gets worse from there.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks why Paul Irving, who had the authority, didn't give the okay. Speaker 1 explains that he testified at the Senate hearing in 2021 and disagreed with Speaker 1's recollection. Speaker 1 turned over his phone records and fought to testify. Speaker 0 questions why Speaker 1 wasn't allowed to testify since he was the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1 explains that initially, the hearing was only for current employees, excluding the top 3 people in security. Speaker 1 called someone on the rules committee to request testifying and promised to show up in person. Speaker 0 highlights the denial of Speaker 1's request for national guardsmen, which was a pivotal moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Paul Irving, the guy who had, you're saying, the statutory authority to to give that okay to, Has he ever explained why he didn't? Speaker 1: Oh, his they had him, and he testified at the Senate hearing in 2001. In 2021? I'm sorry. 2021. My apologies. Thank you for catching. And a couple of times, he he, disagreed with my recollection. I can tell you my phone records. I turned them over immediately. I fought to testify. They didn't want me to testify in the Senate hearing. I fought to testify. Speaker 0: Why wouldn't there's no share. Why who didn't want you to testify? You were the chief of Capitol Police on January 6th. Speaker 1: You and me are on lockstep with this. And my story hasn't changed in two and a half years. So when they first put out the notice, when they were talking about having the hearing, it was only for current employees that were still in place. No long no one that was no longer in place in their position in security. So think about that. Initially, when they put up the request to have the and they put up the they were talking about having the hearing, it would have excluded Paul Irving, would have excluded Mike Stinger, and it would have excluded me. Only 3 people, the 3 people at the top of the security apparatus. So the Speaker 0: Democrats, I think. Speaker 1: Well, it was joint. It was a combined joint. I hear you. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. You're absolutely right. Of course. The unit party intentionally excluded the 3 people who would know the answers to the key questions. Speaker 1: Yeah, the original plan was to exclude them. I immediately called somebody I knew on the rules committee And said, please let me testify. I will be there in person. And I still remember, she said, you'll show up in person. I said, I promise you, I will be there in person. I want to testify. And I was the only one that showed up in person. Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help. That is it. That's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name
Video Transcript AI Summary
The denial of the request for national guardsmen on January 6th remains a pivotal moment. The person responsible for that decision is known, but the reason behind it is still unknown. There has been no answer to that question. Additionally, Representative Bennie Thompson stated that Speaker Pelosi was off limits and her records would not be obtained by the J6 committee. However, she was in charge of the House that day. It is important to uncover the truth and understand what truly happened. Otherwise, it seems absurd, like a scene from a play.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It just seems like the denial of your request to have national guardsmen who are within eyesight, and you saw them, to have them help, that is that's a pivotal moment on that day. And we know the name of the man who made that decision. And we still don't know why he made that decision. And that's just shocking to me. What has he ever answered that question? Speaker 1: No. He's he's never answered that question Specifically, that I'm aware of. And I do know when they were talking about the j six, committee coming out, I think it was, representative Bennie Thompson that had said Speaker Pelosi is off limits, so they wouldn't get any of her records, her phone records. What do you Speaker 0: mean she's off limits? Speaker 1: I believe that was one of the things he said that that her coming into this was she was off limits to the inquiries to the Jane years. Speaker 0: Well, she was running the house that day. Speaker 1: I hear you. I hear you. That I mean, if Speaker 0: we're truly trying to get Speaker 1: to the bottom of this, to find out what happened. Speaker 0: Other than that, missus Lincoln, I mean, that's insane.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urgently called General Walker to request the National Guard's assistance at the Capitol. Despite the imminent danger, the speaker faced resistance from higher-ups who didn't like the optics of the National Guard's presence. The speaker pleaded for help, but was denied multiple times. Eventually, shots were fired, and the speaker had to hang up to handle the situation. The National Guard didn't arrive until 6 PM, and instead of being deployed at the Capitol, they were driven back to the DC Army. The speaker felt betrayed and questioned if there was a conspiracy against protecting the Capitol. The systematic denial of intelligence and support from various agencies led to the baffling conclusion of not protecting the capital.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Called general Walker at 151. I was like, I can't wait any freaking longer. I call him. I said, send me the National Guard as quick as you can. I'm gonna get approval any minute because he asked, so you have approval from the Capitol Police Board? And I said I'll have approval any minute. Please just get them coming this way. So they're within eyesight. Shortly after 209, I talked to them. 234, I get a notification to get on the call with United States Pentagon. I have to sell my request to the National Guard. Along the call with a lieutenant general Piat Piat, trying to make sure I have his name pronounced right, and a, general Flynn is on the call. Ever and it's mainly a pilot that I'm, that I'm speaking with. I get on the call, Mayor Bautista on the call, Chief Conti is on the call, And I said, I need the National Guard immediately. This is an urgent, urgent situation. I still remember saying urgent twice. This is urgent, urgent. They're gonna be looking at the same TVs I'm looking at. Ever I need the National Guard immediately. You know what his response is? Don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Ever like, he goes, I would rather have your officers in the fight, and we can backfill your officer somewhere else. I said, I don't have that option. All my officers are in the fight. He goes, I'm telling you, I don't like the option of the National Guard. You know, I don't like the optics of the National Guard and the Hill. I said, sir, we're having our asses hand to us. This is life or death. I need assistance immediately. Ever. And I still remember he said, you know, my recommendation is not to support the request. I still remember Robert Contee going, woah. Woah. Hold on. You're denying the chief of the Capitol Police? And, he goes, Vegas said, not that we're denying him. I just don't like the optics of the National Guard on Capitol Hill. Have and he goes, I'd rather and he goes back to that again. I'd rather back to all your people. I said, sure, I don't have that option. Speaker 1: This sounds like a setup to me. I'm sorry. It does. It gets better. Speaker 0: So ever I beg and beg, and he goes, well, I'm gonna walk down the hall and, you know, we'll talk to the secretary of defense or whoever is gonna he's gonna talk to. Have, right then, I get notification. Oh, so I'm still still on the call. We have the shooting of Ashley Dabbit. And I said, we have shots fired. I still remember yelling over the phone. We have shots fired on the USAI capital. Is that urgent enough for you now? Hang up the phone because now I gotta start making a notification. Gotta call the sergeant army saying, hey. We got what looks like maybe a confirmed shooting. Do you know when the National Guard finally arrived? Have a 6 PM. 6 PM, they're sworn in on post. Do you know those National Guard, the 150 to a 180 that are within eyesight of the capital? You know what they do with them? They put them in vehicles, drive them around the Capitol back to the DC Army. You know where the DC Army is. It's far away. Yeah. Washington, White House is on one side, United States Capitol, DC Army, almost equidistant on the other RFK Stadium. Yeah. Via RFK Stadium. They drive them back then, and they send me in the evening trips. Not real. Can you freaking believe it? No. That's real. That's real. And you know what else I do? While I'm begging for assistance, depending on sending resources to general's houses to protect their homes, but not me. So you begin to think it seems a little conspiratorial. I can see where somebody I'm not, you know, a conspiracy theorist, but But I could see where people begin to go down that rabbit hole real quick. Speaker 1: That rabbit hole. I mean, I don't know what the other conclusion is because, look, Under pressure, people make mistakes and make bad decisions. But you're describing a systematic denial of intelligence And then of support, defense through a whole bunch of different agencies, a whole bunch of different people, all reaching the same have a baffling conclusion that we're not going to protect the capital.
January 6 - Steve Sund - It Doesn’t Seem Like People want to Get to the Bottom of It Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - They Didn’t Want The Chief of Capital Police to Testify in the J6 Committee Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was told by Bennie Thompson Said Nancy Pelosi was OFF LIMITS for Inquiry into January 6 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - Call with Walter Piatt & General Charles Flynn - It Sounds like a Set-Up! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Three More Clips of then Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund • They didn’t tell the Capitol Police Chief Antifa was in the crowds • Nancy Pelosi’s Operative, Yogananda Pittman • The White House Attack Compared to the January 6 Attack- They Didn’t Protect the White House CLIP 1 January 6 - The Capital Police Chief Steve Sund was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Tucker: Original reports were there were no agents in the crowd. We’ve learned there were in fact a lot of agents in the crowd. DID YOU KNOW? Steve Sund: No!… Shortly after January 6…> and I get a call from overseas & it was Great Britain Press, asking me about Feds in the crowd… I was like no, I would have been told, I’ve got lots of friends with the bureau, they all have my cell phone number, they would have told me..“ Your “friends” didn’t tell you Steve. This Clip https://rumble.com/v36k6if-january-6-the-capital-police-chief-was-not-informed-there-were-federal-agen.html CLIP 2 January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative who was Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” 👀 “The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the Capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on National TV, blames leadership at the top, calls for my resignation & then lies about me. The very next day, Yogananda Pittman, is placed as Acting Chief. Yogananda Pittman was the head of intelligence for the Capital Police, thus she would have been responsible for an “intelligence failure”. She ended up getting a vote of NO CONFIDENCE from the Police Officers, and ended up being rewarded with the position as Chief of Police for the University of California Berkeley, which is right across from Nancy Pelosi’s district. How much does a Chief of Police make in Berkeley, CA? The average Chief of Police salary in Berkeley, CA is $143,200 as of July 25, 2023. The Chief of Police, Tom Manger, was asked about her position & he said Pittman was given some type of a “Secret Leave” so that she could leave & start her job on February 1st at Berkeley and not retire from the Capital Police four months later.” This Video https://rumble.com/v36l29u-january-6-yogananda-pittman-nancy-pelosis-operative-rewarded-with-a-cushy-j.html CLIP 3 January 6 - DC Police were Prevented from Protecting the White House & More Officers were Injured During that Attack then there were on January 6 - Charges Dropped against ALL those who Attacked the White House “The agency formed by Congress specifically for the US President, the Washington DC Police Department, when the White House was under attack and they are prevented from going on White House grounds to help the Secret Service to defend the White House!” 🤯 More officers were also injured in the Attack on the White House than there were at January 6. “I’m told by Park Police that all charges were dropped!” On those who attacked the White House. TREASON! This Clip https://rumble.com/v36lteo-january-6-steve-sund-the-white-house-under-attack-was-not-stopped-and-more-.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a debate about the presence of federal agents at the January 6 event. Initially, it was denied, but now it is confirmed that there were indeed federal agents in the crowd. It is not uncommon for federal agencies to have people in plain clothes for situational awareness at large events like demonstrations and inaugurations. The FBI took overt action to prevent certain individuals from attending the January 6 event. A GAO report revealed that the FBI was tracking 18 or 19 domestic terrorists planning to attend the event. It is concerning that this information was not shared with intelligence. It is important to deconflict and communicate with the Chief of Capitol Police to avoid any confusion or conflicts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the aftermath of January 6, there's been a huge debate over to what extent, you know, there were federal agents or people who are working in some way for federal agencies in the crowd. And the initial explanation was, well, none, and you're insane if you think that you're Alex Jones, you're crazy. And then over the last couple of years, we've seen people confirm, people in authority confirm actually, yeah, there were a lot in the crowd that day. I mean, that's now a fact. Did you know that going in? Speaker 1: No. They Speaker 0: were no. So just for perspective, since you've been to a lot of these events, there's a huge a planned demonstration in Washington, D. C. Will there always be assets, agents, people working for federal agencies in the crowd and civilian close? Speaker 1: There always could be. And for like inaugurations, There would usually be some combined teams out there, one for communications but just for situational awareness. So It wouldn't be surprising, 4th July, different things like that where you have threat pictures or concerning threat pictures. Speaker 0: And what does that look like? Does that mean, FBI agents dressed in dockers and tennis shoes trying to Speaker 1: Well, just be plain clothes, plain clothes to blend in. So that wouldn't be unusual and it'd be, you know, just standard police work. That'd be a good police work. So coming into January 6, and and and I talk about it in the book with The fact that shortly after January 6, I'm driving through Loudoun County. I'm coming I actually just talked to somebody from the Hill, and I get a call from overseas and it say it's press. I don't remember which what it was. It's somebody from, Great Britain. And they started asking me about feds in the crowd. I was like, no. No. I would have been told. So now we're getting word that there is feds in the crowd. I said, no. They I would have been told. I've got lots of friends with the, with the bureau. They all have my cell number they they would have told me. You know, think about that. And Jill Sanborn's testimony in 2021 where she said they were taking over action To keep certain people from coming to January 6th to to watch DC. That's that's big for c for FBI to start taking overt action. I mean, that's not covert, over. That's a big that's a big deal. Fast forward to February of this year 2023 and the GAO report that says, on January 4 January 3rd, the FBI was tracking 4 domestic terrorists that we're talking about coming to Washington DC, the Washington field office, their AOR, area of responsibility. By January 6, they were tracking 18 or 19 in the GAO report. Domestic terrorists. So think about that. They have 18 or 19 domestic terrorists coming to this event, So of course, they're going to have resources on them. And then you're not going to be just putting 1 agent, you're going to have multiples. So it would be multiple with that. And I don't know how many they actually had in there. So That would be regular standard police works. I would be surprised by it. But not to share that in the intelligence? That's concerning. Speaker 0: So I mean, it seems like common sense suggests anyway that you would have to tell the Chief of Capitol Police that, hey, we've got our guys in the crowd. Like just because, I mean, you would want to know the difference, correct? Speaker 1: You would absolutely want to know the difference and deconfliction. Want to have things like that. A lot of the folks will already know there's a lot of standard procedures for way to deconflict, so you don't have blue on blue type of situations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yogananda Pittman, the former Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security of the Capitol Police, was appointed as acting chief after the January 6 attack on the Capitol. However, there were concerns about an intelligence failure and her role in it. She later became the chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley, which raised questions about a potential reward. It was revealed that she was given a secret leave to start her new job while still being employed by the Capitol Police. Whistleblowers within the intelligence unit had raised concerns and faced punishment. This situation appears suspicious and raises doubts about the integrity of the process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's Yogananda Pittman? Yogananda Pittman was Speaker 1: my Assistant Chief for Intelligence and Security. Speaker 0: Okay. So, did she have the intelligence that you didn't have? Speaker 1: I I don't know. Speaker 0: What do you mean you don't know? Speaker 1: I I I don't know. I you don't know what you don't know. I don't know what she had and what she didn't have, but I do know that when you look at it and we immediately knew, I mean, anybody immediately knew. One of the first things you start to think about is this an intelligence failure. So think about it. We go through January 6. I was begging for the National Guard, refused before, Fused during it. We get the capital under control. You know, I get them to where they can go back into session, 7:30. They elect to go in at 8 and then the house goes at 9. But nonetheless so think about this. The very next day, less than 24 hours after we got control of the of the capital, Nancy Pelosi goes on national TV, Blames leadership at the top of Capitol Police, calls for my resignation on national TV, and then lies about me. Okay? The very next day the very next day puts Yogananda Pittman as acting chief. Speaker 0: But Yogananda Pittman, You just described her as the head of intelligence for Capitol Police. Correct. So if there was an intelligence failure, Which again doesn't seem like a failure. It seems very intentional to me. But if there was such a failure, she'd be responsible, Correct? Or she'd be in the chain of responsibility anyway? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, she was she was the head of intelligence. So if there's intelligence failure, see, my thing is Do a proper analysis. You know? You know, why do a knee jerk reaction? I mean, putting her in charge, I mean, she ended up getting a a vote of no confidence. So she didn't get the position from the from the police officers because many were upset with what happened. So she Speaker 0: Where where did she wind up? Speaker 1: Where is she now? Yeah. She's chief of police for the University of California, Berkeley. Interesting. Speaker 0: So right across from Nancy Pelosi's district? Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: In the Bay Area. Speaker 1: That is correct. Speaker 0: So you just kind of take the Bay Bridge over there and that's where she is now. What does that position pay, do you know? Speaker 1: I think it pays pretty well. There was a Pays extraordinarily well. I'm sure it pays pretty good. It's interesting, there was a hearing just recently that was on it's on TV. You can look at it, where the chief of police, Tom Manger, was asked about Her position, it turns out that she was given some type of a secret leave. So she'd leave, start her job on February 1st as the chief of police, and not retire from the capital police for months later. Speaker 0: Oh, so you should get the benefits. Speaker 1: Yeah. Think about that. Yeah. It appears to be against departmental policy, And nobody originally was told. Speaker 0: What you're saying is that the head of intelligence for the Capitol Police, which Demonstrably didn't have the intelligence that needed to protect the building. That person was first elevated to acting chief Of Capitol Police and then given a very high paying job right across Nancy Pelosi's district at the University of California, Berkeley. Speaker 1: That is correct. And I will say that So Speaker 0: that looks like a reward to me. Speaker 1: Well, I do know that the unit had significant intelligence, and I know many people within the unit were pushing that intelligence up to the to the leadership of the unit. So I do I do know that. Many of them became whistle blowers, and many of them were punished and forced to resign. Yep. Speaker 0: This looks like a scam. I
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack on the White House. They mention the fire at Saint John's Church and the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House. They question who made the decision to prevent the police from defending the White House and highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied. The speaker also mentions that more officers were injured during the riots than on January 6th. They speculate on how things would have been different if Barack Obama had been president. Overall, they find the situation concerning and suggest that Trump may be a key factor in all of this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many things that that are in here. I talk about the 2020 riots versus the 20 the the January 6 attack. Speaker 1: The riots in front of the White House were famously Saint John's Church was set on fire. Speaker 0: White House, across the country. You know, I talk about the White House, and I talk about an agency that was formed by congress Specifically for the protection of the United States president, the Washington DC Police Department. The White House is under attack, and they are prevented. They are prevented. I know it's not from chief Newsom. It's from his you know, he was the chief at the time. Would have been from, above him. They're from prevented from going on cap on White House grounds and helping the United States seek its service from defending the the White House. So think about that. Church. You know, who made that decision? Again, all I know is, you know, Nutrien's hands were tied. So Mayor Bowser, Higher? I don't know. But think about that. Speaker 1: Somebody told when there and there was real rioting. In fact, I think Oh. That more officers were injured Hit that riot. Then were injured on January 6th, I think. Speaker 0: Yep. Yep. Again, don't take my word. Jail report. More officers injured at the Protest by the White House and on January 6th. And I'm told by Park Police, all charges were dropped According to the, the, fighting at Lafayette Park and at the, at the White House. There were secret service agents bloodied and battered over there. There was a number of federal agencies that were hurt. Structure set on fire. They tried to light the Hay Adams Hotel on fire that was occupied. Think about that. Charges dropped. No no such situation. I mean, when you look at the disparity of how justice is being applied, again, that's that's scary. That becomes really scary when, it becomes politicized like that. And that's what appears to have happened. Speaker 1: I mean, it sounds like Trump is the key to all of this. If Trump hadn't been the president, things would have been very responses would have been very different, don't you think? I mean, if Barack Obama had been president, do you think that someone would have told MPD that Washington D. C. Police Department, they couldn't protect the White House? Speaker 0: Again, I don't I I protect the White House. I don't I see what you're saying there. I I don't know. I mean, I think not. Speaker 1: Like, I mean, it's a hypothetical. I I shouldn't ask you to answer hypothetical questions, but it does seem seems amazing.
January 6 - The Capital Police Chief was Not Informed there Were Federal Agents in the Crowd Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Who’s Yogananda Pittman? Nancy Pelosi’s Operative Rewarded with a Cushy Job & “Secret Leave” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Steve Sund - The White House Under Attack was not Stopped & More Officers Injured Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

This is a meeting just before January 6, where BLM Leader(s) Government Workers, Media Leaks, were Conspiring against the US Government, & planning the REAL Insurrection, including violence & breaking windows. As you heard in the above statements from the Capitol Police Chief, Antifa was there and he was not briefed of their presence. Why wouldn’t the Capitol Police Chief be briefed of this? https://rumble.com/v2478bm-january-6-meeting-exposed-blm-government-workers-media-leaks-breaking-windo.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Shut It Down DC discusses their plans for responding to a potential coup and contested election scenarios. They emphasize the need to take action in the streets and disrupt business as usual in Congress. There is talk of revolution and potential violence, with some suggesting breaking windows to enter government buildings. Leaking information to journalists and creating parallel structures are mentioned as tactics. Federal workers are encouraged to engage in noncooperation to undermine those in power. The importance of communication with grassroots groups and sustained organizing is highlighted. Practical examples of slowing down processes and exposing wrongdoing are shared. Overall, the focus is on taking decisive action to resist a potential coup.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really wanna hear from, Shut It Down DC about this. Do you do we have any plans for how to respond if there's a coup? Speaker 1: Yeah. We, have been in discussion for a couple months About, how to respond to different contested election scenarios. 1st step is that we we think that we need to start the The post election phase in the streets. Congress is planning on coming to town and passing laws again and, like, having business as usual, and we're saying there's If if we're in a coup, there's no time for business as usual. Speaker 0: I heard someone in the chat talking about revolution time, and so I encourage, You know, for all of us to be fighting for revolution before today, today, tomorrow, afterwards. Speaker 2: We're facing an administration and a potential coup and a Potential insurrection where, efforts to criminalize this are going to be even greater. Understanding that everything that we're doing now in this moment is laying the groundwork for what is going to come. Is there going to be a war? Are people gonna get killed? Like, is that on anybody else's mind? I'm guessing it is. We're gonna see potential fighting all over the country or in some hot spots. We might need to think about that. And I know as I you know, I said earlier how, you know, we may find ourselves in the streets with people with different tactics than ours. But, like, there may be some people that are willing to break the windows to get into the government buildings. Like, If that's what we need to do, then we shouldn't fight about that. Let's do that. Let's take over the buildings. Speaker 3: Text them, leak everything you can. The journalists I've dealt with have been super ethical in ways to shield me To be the source of the leaks. Speaker 4: Groups on the outside being able to show, solidarity with federal workers. Making sure that we're naming What is happening is a coup. Speaker 5: Totally agreed. In the subbound BP conversations that I've been having that's not on the federal side, we, also are often Call it a coup. It's a coup. Don't let anyone tell you it's not. Speaker 4: President Harry s Truman famously said, I thought I was the president, But when it comes to these bureaucrats, I can't do a damn thing. So the bottom line with this is that we all as ordinary people, and as federal workers have power? If masses of people engage in noncooperation, no ruler can stay in power. Bureaucracy is a really powerful pillar and, you know, federal workers have unparalleled familiarity with the bureaucratic process. They know how to speed things up. They know how to slow them down. They have access to critical information about policies that are being considered and implemented. They can participate in an internal decision making. They can provide or deny knowledge and expertise that those, at the top of the bureaucratic totem pole, need. It ultimately comes down to individual decisions and personal choice. Deciding what to do or what not to do is a very personal decision. It's based on context. It's based on your rank, on your tolerance for risk, on your preparation and frankly where you sit in the federal, federal bureaucracy. We're talking about the range of different tactics. We talk about acts of commission and acts of omission. And another act of commission, albeit Highly, you know, risky, and there are a number of, great downsides is leaking. So leaking information about pending or actual policies with journalists, with activists, influential people on the outside. So another act of, Of commission is creating parallel structures or self organizing units. So organizing in the office place, in the workplace. Speaker 6: As an attorney in the federal government, I I am finding the chat suggestions very interesting, and I just do wanna remind people that we lose our status as federal employees if we strike. Speaker 7: And there's been a little conversation going on here, for example, about Black Lives Matter and how that is an example of a nonpartisan political statement. Guess that's been previously litigated, but whether or not you do a misdemeanor or an infraction on federal property or on public property, really doesn't affect, most of the jobs, that you would be considered for. Speaker 6: Yeah. As an attorney, I think I'm We we're highly, you know, that's one of the things we have to be careful about. Speaker 4: I would just say this is also the importance of being in communication with and in touch With groups, civic groups, grassroots groups that are preparing people for the possibility that red lines may be crossed, that, You know, there that the election goes sideways, you know, so everything from choose democracy to hold the line, to To shut down, we count on us. I listed a few of those in the slides earlier, but they're the ones who are really in the vanguard of Helping people think about, interpret red lines, and think about different actions that can be taken well beyond kind of street protests and demonstrations, but kind of Sustained organizing an action. Speaker 7: What does it look like in practical terms to put you know, to slow the gears down in some ways or another? Speaker 6: At the Department of Labor, it it takes the form of, several rounds of the cost benefit analysis for a new regulation. And when, When the numbers were when people were cheating on the numbers, a copy of that draft got leaked, to the data labor report, and it got published and it got sent to a congressperson, and the office of inspector general opened an investigation on who was cheating on the numbers. So, again, that's sort of a combination of tactics. It's it's it's making really the paper trail. It's making sure that that document got out to someone who could make use of it and then congress getting the office of inspector general involved. It's it was really a way to Stop that thing just in its tracks, and it it worked really well.
January 6 Meeting Exposed: BLM, Government Workers, Media Leaks, Breaking Windows- They we’re Planning the REAL Insurrection! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth My Website— www.theunshakeablepundit.com rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

We know Antifa was involved and was there according to Attorney Joeseph McBride uncovering A 96-Page DC Police Report which showed the Government Knew Antifa was coming https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H3mHiUZCz9jyfDFTTpYw7VuYCgMtuLWW/view Not only that, this report shows they were anticipating violence and still, Nancy Pelosi denied Trumps request to provide the National Guard. Here is the US Capitol Police CDU Operations Plan for J6 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yfivz5NdQa90gVXoC1nKNN_1zsDK4J1V/view Here are Several Documented Instances CLIP 1 A Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him This person was never charged. Why? This Video https://rumble.com/v2ceie4-january-6-masked-man-with-earpiece-caught-tearing-up-capital-building-windo.html CLIP 2 January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfl9k-january-6-antifa-identified-and-forced-from-the-steps-at-capital-building.html CLIP 3 January 6: Two Camera Angles of Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” You’ll never see this on CNN. This Video https://rumble.com/v2cfoxs-january-6-antifa-breaking-capital-windows-while-trump-supporters-stop-them-.html

January 6: Masked Man with Earpiece (Antifa? FBI?), Caught Tearing up Capital Building Window- While Trump Supporter Tries to Stop Him Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Identified & Forced From the Steps at Capital Building By Trump Supporters Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
January 6: Antifa Breaking Capital Windows while Trump Supporters Try to Stop Them & Shout “F*CK ANTIFA!” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

CLIP 1 Here is a DC Officer admitting they were also undercover as Antifa in the crowd. “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” This Video https://rumble.com/v35qnwc-january-6-dc-officer-we-go-undercover-as-antifa-in-the-crowd.html CLIP 2 One of the more concerning things to come out of the Jan 6 Report, or should I say did not come out, was the fact they Hid Any Mention of the Pipe Bomber, who was specifically responsible for Shutting Down Congress That Day This video is proof that the FBI lied and this is a coverup. The average rate of a CCT camera in America is 15 fps (Frames per Seccond). The video the FBI released to the public was 1 fps. You read that right. ☝️ The average gas station camera is 15 fps, which would make the camera(s) at the DNC fifteen times worse…. Than a gas station. Who was it? Antifa? FBI? If it was a Trump supporter they would have been front page news. The FBI are able to track down peaceful protesters across the US but not a suspect planting bombs? This video https://rumble.com/v228q0m-fbi-releases-impossible-1-fps-video-of-the-dc-pipe-bomber-impeach-merrick-g.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
FBI agents are seeking tips to identify the suspect who planted bombs near the Democratic National Party headquarters. Videos show the suspect sitting on a park bench before one of the bombs was placed. The frame rate of CCTV cameras is typically around 15 frames per second (FPS). However, the security video released by the FBI of the January 6th pipe bomb suspect shows only 1 FPS, which is highly unlikely for unaltered footage. The DNC has a history of security concerns, including the Watergate scandal, and the use of 1 FPS footage is statistically improbable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lester, FBI agents say they have no idea who planted the bombs, and they hope these new videos will generate some valuable tips. 1 shows the suspect walking up and sitting on a park bench near the Democratic National Party headquarters. 1 of the bombs was later planted in this same area. Speaker 1: Frames per second, like its name implies, is the number of a Individual images or frames, the system captures every second. The average industry frame rate of most CCTV cameras is around 15 frames a per second. Speaker 2: We also recommend using a minimum of 15 FPS or frames per second. Speaker 0: Now here at Proactive Security, we recommend actually 15 frames per second. Speaker 2: What you're looking at is the actual frame speed of the security video the FBI released to the public of the January 6th pipe bomb Suspect. It's just 1 frame per second. You're going to learn now why that is virtually impossible unless this tape is not the original source footage. A comprehensive study in 2021 by one of the world's leading authorities on security cameras found that 0% of cameras in fuse in America today operated at just 1 frame per second. Statistically speaking, the odds that the video the FBI a Police to the public was unaltered is less than 1%. The average gas station in America uses 15 frames per second. That make the DNC national headquarters 15 times worse than the average gas station. A Meanwhile, we know the DNC cares so much about security at this area that for years, they have stationed a physical guard during a during the daytime right at this site. And that makes sense. It was the break in of the DNC national headquarters 50 years ago that Pause the largest scandal in American history, Watergate. Between the history of attacks on the DNC building, plus the fact that DC was once the murder capital of the country plus the fact that 0% of cameras in use today use one frame per second. It is virtually impossible the tape the FBI released was the actual unedited footage.
January 6 - DC Officer “We Go Undercover as Antifa in the Crowd” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
FBI Releases Impossible 1 FPS Video of the DC “Pipe Bomber”- Impeach Merrick Garland Now! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

We also now know there was an FBI presence on January 6— Hundreds of agents in the crowd when at first they said there was little to no FBI presence How many of these agents played a role in instigating or steering violence? It was later discovered that Internal FBI Communications in the United States v Ethan Nordean case revealed the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were Found to be DESTROYING EVIDENCE! This not only proves the FBI lied on the stand, but there were criminal informants involved who sought to have their records altered to conceal their involvement! This may be a Brady violation! Brady Disclosure: “The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant.” This Video https://rumble.com/v2cj02o-january-6-internal-fbi-communications-reveal-the-fbi-demanded-the-removal-o.html United States https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23699546-nordean-filing-on-fbi-testimony In addition, a motion filed by a J6’er Pezzola’s attorney, Roger Root, the FBI Admitted to having 40 Undercover Agents (that we know of) Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 The DOJ admitted that of the 13 Proud Boys involved with J6, eight or more of them were paid by the FBI to provide the government information about the group. The Proud Boys were outnumbered 10-1 by undercover gov’t agents and informants at the Capitol Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=shocking-update-fbi-now-admits-40-undercover-agents-infiltrated-the-crowds-on-jan-6-fedsurrection

Video Transcript AI Summary
New information has emerged regarding internal FBI messages related to January 6th. The messages reveal a demand to edit confidential human source reports and remove agent participation. In a recent court filing, it was disclosed that FBI special agent Nicole Miller compiled her messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was produced to the US attorney's office. However, a closer examination of the spreadsheet uncovered over 1,000 hidden rows of messages. The documents also show an agent requesting Miller to edit out their presence in a CHS informant report. Additionally, there is mention of an FBI boss assigning the destruction of 338 items of evidence. These revelations suggest that the FBI was present during the January 6th events, infiltrating groups and inciting violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New bombshell information coming out in regards to the internal FBI messages surrounding January 6th, demanding confidential human source reports be edited to remove agent participation. In the Nordean filing on FBI testimony, case number 121cr00 175tjk, document number 678, filed on March 9th 2023, United States of America versus Ethan Nordian as the defendant. Hu Nordean's notice of argument in support of impeachment of witness with hidden Jenks related communications. Today, government witness special agent Nicole Miller was cross examined. She testified that she understood her legal duty under the Jenks act to produce the US attorney's office written statements relating to the subject matter of her testimony. Miller acknowledged that among those statements were messages to be sent in the FBI's link messaging system where bureau employees communicate with one another. She testified that in order to comply with her Jinx obligations, he compiled her links messages in an Excel spreadsheet, which was then produced to the USAO. The version of Miller's Excel sheet produced to the defense contained 25 rows of her linked messages. In cross examination, the agent acknowledged she compiled that disclosure. She testified that those messages constituted a complete production of her Jinx statements from links. However, a close examination of the agent's sheet revealed over 1,000 hidden Excel rows of messages. Further on into the documents reveal an agent's request to special agent Miller to go into a CHS informant report that Miller just put together and edit out the agent was present. Quote, you need to go into that CHS report you just put and edit out that I was present, end quote. Hu- further along in these documents reveal that Miller's communication with another agent who states that the agent's FBI boss assigned her 338 items of evidence I have to destroy. So not only have we learned that the F. Was in fact there for the January 6th events. We also learned that through Ray Epps and other evidence that they were in fact embedded inside the crowd. They acted as Trump supporters. They infiltrated groups and invoked violence. Hue, and now we are learning that they are destroying evidence.
January 6 Bombshell! Internal FBI Communications Reveal the FBI Demanded the Removal of Agent Participation & Were DESTROYING EVIDENCE! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth Tip/Donating https://truthsocial.com/@MJT rumble.com
Nordean Filing on FBI Testimony documentcloud.org
SHOCKING UPDATE: FBI Now Admits to 40 Undercover Agents Infiltrated the Crowds on Jan. 6 #Fedsurrection | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft Federal operative takes down fencing on January 6 before Trump supporters arrived in mass at the US Capitol. thegatewaypundit.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

What role did Ray Epps play? For who? What agency? The FBI seems most logical because The FBI only removed 3 people from the Most Wanted list, one of them being Ray Epps. And it appears they were doing everything they can to cover for him. CLIP 1 New Footage of Ray Epps appeared out of the 14,000 hours of hidden footage. In a nutshell, the first video is what was played in the courtroom, in the Proud Boys trial. The video shows a “GLITCH” on the feed, at a specific point in time. The second ORIGINAL video, clearly shows no distortion but shows Ray Epps entering the scene and makes the first breach through a black fence with an army of all black dressed supposed “MAGA supporters”. They doctored the video to be presented in court! Clear tampering of evidence! CLIP 2 Tucker Carlson uncovered a New Video that exposed Ray Epps for committing PERJURY. https://rumble.com/v2c179s-january-6-new-video-exposes-ray-epps-for-perjury.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, the role of intelligence and law enforcement agencies during the Capitol events remains a mystery. It is known that there were undercover federal agents present, but their purpose is unclear. Ray Epps, a figure seen encouraging the crowd to enter the Capitol, has not been indicted for his actions. Despite admitting to orchestrating the protests and helping people get there, Epps claimed he never entered the Capitol. However, surveillance footage contradicts his testimony, showing him remaining at the Capitol for at least another half hour. The January 6th committee likely knew about this, yet defended Epps. The reasons for Epps' actions and the committee's defense remain unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the enduring mysteries of January 6th is the role that intelligence and law enforcement agencies played in the events of that day. We know there was some number of undercover federal agents in the crowd at the Capitol. Officials have since admitted that under oath. But what exactly were they doing there? The January 6th committee worked hard are to hide the answer to that question. We do know from contemporaneous video tape that a mysterious figure called Ray Epps encouraged the crowd should go into the capital. For some reason, Epps has never been indicted for that, but there's no question he didn't. We need to go into the capital. Were at all. Under public pressure, the January 6th committee finally interviewed Ray Epps. Epps told the committee that he never entered the capital and therefore never committed a crime. His text messages showed that at 2:12 PM, he boasted to his nephew view that he had, quote, orchestrated the protests at the Capitol. He admitted he helped get people there. Yet, curiously, congressional Democrats consider Ray Epps an ally, not an insurrectionist. Tonight, we can tell you that at the very least, Ray Epps lied in his sworn testimony to the January 6th committee, Epps testified that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he he'd already left the capitol grounds to return to his hotel room. That is not true. The surveillance footage we found shows that in fact, Ray Epps remained at the capitol for at least another half an hour. You're seeing that on your screen now. What was Epps doing there? We can't say, but we do know that he lied had 2 investigators. The January 6th committee likely knew this too. Democrats had access to the same tape, yet they defended Ray Epps. No investigation would do that.
January 6: New Video exposes Ray Epps for PERJURY and Lied to Investigators! rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

🚨 Ray Epps Adopted Daughter was interviewed by @dom_lucre & she tells quite a sick disturbing story into who Ray Epps is… MY NOTES: (TSTM= Twitter Space Time Mark) In this clip, at the 1:28:00 TSTM, she claims Ray Epps forced her to strip naked while she was on her period at 14 years old, & forced her to sleep outside in the cold, and she had to sleep with the dog to get warm. 59:20 TSTM- Dom confirms in a Twitter post she is who she says she is via adoption papers, brith certificate, & photos 45:45 TSTM- She underwent 6 name changes indicating she may have been kidnapped 47:45 TSTM- She was photographed naked “scouted from a modeling agency” 1:00:00 TSTM- Ray was a high ranking LDS priesthood holder 1:12:30 TSTM- Rays nickname was sniper on the roof 1:20:15 TSTM- J6’er George Tanios spoke to her This Clip https://rumble.com/v2keb8w-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-talks-about-having-to-strip-and-sleep-o.html Full Discussion https://rumble.com/v2ke1xa-january-6-ray-epps-adopted-daughter-on-her-being-abused-and-molested.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker shares a disturbing experience involving Robyn and Ray. Robyn would sometimes be incoherent due to medication. The speaker recalls two specific incidents. In one, Ray made the speaker strip in front of him while thinking Robyn was asleep. The speaker felt embarrassed and uncomfortable, especially since they were only 14 and hadn't started using tampons yet. Ray then made the speaker sleep outside, even though it was cold. The speaker had to snuggle up with their dog for warmth. Ray threatened the speaker, saying he would hunt them down if they tried to run away or seek help. The next day, the speaker was allowed back inside. The speaker also expresses their disdain for Robyn, calling them a piece of shit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was always not always. It would be when Robyn was incoherent. She took medications. I don't know what they were at the time, but, she was like a zombie, and there was 1 there was 2 specific times that stick out to me one time, was when he was having me strip in front of him because he thought that Robin was in bed asleep, and 1 by 1, I had to take my clothing off, and I remember at that time, I'm, fuck. It's embarrassing. I hadn't started using tampons yet, I was 14, and I got to the point where it was just my panties, and he was sitting on the couch, and I remember looking at him, and he said, drop them, and I said, please don't make me do this. And, I had to. And then, he made me sleep outside, but before that happened, before I hold my panties down, you know, on my period, you know, do the math, Haben had walked out of the bedroom, and down the hall, she looked at me, and she looked at Ray, and looked back at me and shook her head, went back into her room and shut the door, and that's when I had to continue taking off my panties, and then he said, now you can sleep outside. And I had to sleep outside, and yes, we lived in Arizona, and I do not remember the month, but I remember being cold, and I remember having to snuggle up with my dog to keep me warm. And he said, if you try to run away, I will hunt you down, and I will find you. And if you try to call the police or tell anybody, just remember who are they gonna believe? Me or you? I'm an adult near a child, and so I stayed naked in my backyard with my dog all night, and then I was allowed in the next day. And Robin is just as big of a piece of shit, if not more, than he is,
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Talks About Having to Strip & Sleep Outside While on Her Period - Abuse She Suffered from Ray Epps Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
January 6 - Ray Epps Adopted Daughter Tells Horrific & Heartbreaking Story on Her Being Abused & Molested by Epps Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

January 6 Entrapment! The following footage was Obtained from the United States department of justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper West Terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. The video shows they were waved in by police. It is clear no violence or crime was committed by the people in this video. They were allowed in and are included in the video below. https://rumble.com/v1135ol-bombshell-january-6-entrapment-new-video-surfaces.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Surveillance footage from the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, shows police officers allowing protesters to exit through the Upper West Terrace doors. A man holding an American flag catches the door and waves to the crowd outside. Meanwhile, another man with a red cap approaches the interior doors and is let in by a police officer. A large group of protesters enters the Capitol through the doors, with police officers standing by and allowing them to pass. Around 250 protesters entered that day, many of whom are charged with felony obstruction. At one point, a police officer walks with the protesters, showing no signs of fear. Eventually, police stop the protesters briefly before allowing them to enter again. At 2:47 PM, the doors are closed and no more individuals enter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The following footage was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the upper west terrace doors of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Just after 2:33 PM, police officers allow 5 individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 2:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 2:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 2:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors. They can see police officers standing at the interior doors, allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 2:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 2:36:54, Speaker 1: the police allowed the crowd to pass. At 2:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. Speaker 0: At 2:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. Speaker 1: At 2:44 pm, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. Speaker 0: At 2:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear closed the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individuals entered through the Upper West Terrace doors.
BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! BOMBSHELL! January 6 Entrapment! New Video Surfaces! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me on Truth Socia rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

More Proof it was a a SET UP. Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel At the 0:34 Mark Tactical Officer: “….Any identifiers?” USCP Officer: “They will have a wristband. Their guns will have a candy stripe on the barrel. I don’t know the wristband color. They will have a wristband somewhere. OK?” https://rumble.com/v35s94o-january-6-undercover-feds-identifiers-theyll-have-a-wristband-or-candy-stri.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person describes a man wearing a black vest with a pink blue line and dark hair. They mention that he may be around 27 years old and has something on his hip. The speaker also mentions that there were too many people for the police to reach. They describe another person as a white male with dark hair. The speaker then talks about the appearance of the uniformed officers, mentioning that they may have a wristband and a stripe on their gun barrel. However, they are unsure of the color of the wristband.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys are here. Black vest. Pink blue line. Thing on, dark hair. And he's kinda like a lookin' like a 27 or something on his hip. No police identity came couldn't get to them because there were so many people. 5 piece of white mix on white male. White male, dark hair. Yeah. Yeah. Alright. Looks like grayish black, maybe maybe a, digital gun. Uniform guys have any identifiers like, they will have a wristband. Their guns will have a handy stripe on the barrel. Okay. I don't know the wristband color, but they'll have a wristband line, somewhere.
January 6 - Capital Police Undercover Identifiers? They’ll have a Wristband or Candy Stripe on The Barrel Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 5:10 PM

@VincentCrypt46 - Vincent Kennedy

.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a document called the 17/76 returns document that was intended to be used as evidence against those present on Capitol Hill on January 6th. It outlines the actions to be taken when taking over the government and raiding the building. This document was not created by the Proud Boys or any of the patriots present that day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever heard of the 17/76 returns document? No. You probably haven't. They didn't want you to know about it. Now they were going to use it in court as evidence against everybody that was on the Hill on January 6th. Yeah. It's a document that says, here's what we're going to do when we when we take the government over. When we raid the building and go inside, these are the things that we need to do and to be aware of. It's called the 17/76 returns document. It wasn't produced by the Proud Boys. It wasn't produced by any of the patriots on the hill that day. No. It was produced and disseminated by the

@TheNotoriousLMC - Lisa Mei

How long has Congress known about this? FTA: The document laid out a plan for the occupation of eight key buildings in the District of Columbia on January 6, 2021. This included House and Senate office buildings and the Supreme Court. The strategy included a call for the…

Saved - September 5, 2025 at 3:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spent hours digging into the events of January 6, aiming to uncover information often obscured by mainstream narratives. I shared details about various legal cases, including a 69-year-old grandmother who faced serious charges but ended up with a plea deal. I highlighted instances of Capitol Police interacting with protesters, raising questions about the narrative of violence. I also discussed the role of informants and the perceived discrepancies in justice, particularly regarding the treatment of different individuals involved. Additionally, I touched on the tragic case of Ashli Babbitt and the ongoing legal battles surrounding the events of that day.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Spent hours researching truth about Jan 6 for some normies, so i'm making a thread w the hard-to-find info buried in all the propaganda. if u have anything u want to add, please post it bellow. starting w DOJ's official record of Capital Breech Cases: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

Department of Justice | Homepage | United States Department of Justice Official website of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). DOJ’s mission is to enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. justice.gov

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

some cases have charges like this: 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2) 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G) these are what prosecutors accused a 69 y/o granny W/ CANCER of doing. she ended up taking a plea deal: 60 days in jail + 3 YEARS probation

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

This is a 69-year-old grandmother convicted for a misdemeanor of demonstrating, parading or picketing in U.S. Capitol Building original charges were dropped: 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2) 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G) what were they?

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

18 U.S. Code § 1752 (a:1) (a:2) Restricted building or grounds Whoever— (1)knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds w/out lawful authority to do so (2)knowingly, and w intent 2 impede/disrupt orderly conduct of Government business or official functions

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Robert Smigel & co entered the Capital building on 2 separate occasions... ...members of the group had been told at various points by the U.S. Capitol Police that they were supposed to have an escort.” they didn't, yet DOJ dropped trespassing charges 🤔 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/stephen-colbert-team-capitol-hill-charges-dropped-b2126223.html

Colbert team no longer facing trespassing charges for entering Capitol building Show’s production team included Robert Smigel, the voice behind Triumph the Insult Comic Dog independent.co.uk

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

“The Office would be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these invited guests were guilty of the crime of unlawful entry because their escort chose to leave them unattended.” suuure. that, ladies & gents is what we call 2-tiered justice. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/stephen-colbert-team-capitol-hill-charges-dropped-b2126223.html

Colbert team no longer facing trespassing charges for entering Capitol building Show’s production team included Robert Smigel, the voice behind Triumph the Insult Comic Dog independent.co.uk

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Rioters WALK Through Capitol Building, Statuary Hall Outside of House Chamber. like all RIOTERS, they respectfully maneuver between the velvet ropes, while taking pictures & enjoying the Capital Polices' tour of the building. those destructive SOBs! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOGXkMmtl6I

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

here's some more footage of Jan 6 protestors calmly walking around in the capital w/ police fist bumping and looking on. how many of these people were punished for taking this "tour?"

@RyanPatrick1991 - RyanFJBLGB🇺🇸🦅

I cannot believe how violent these extremists were on J6. The Capitol Police barely escaped with their lives.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Alarming new footage of US Capitol siege shows rioters ransacking and praying in the Senate Chamber as well as thanking police for letting them in. since WHEN are praying & thanking police officers considered "alarming" behavior? am i missing something? https://www.facebook.com/9News/videos/new-footage-shows-us-rioters-thanking-police-for-letting-them-in/2309321259199602/

137K views · 1K reactions | Alarming new footage of the US Capitol siege shows rioters ransacking and praying in the Senate Chamber as well as thanking police for letting them in. #9News | Nightly at 6.00pm | 9 News Alarming new footage of the US Capitol siege shows rioters ransacking and praying in the Senate Chamber as well as thanking police for letting them in.... facebook.com

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

The story of @AmericaShaman Jacob Chansley was nicknamed The Q ANON Shaman by the media. They lied about him for YEARS. refusing to release video footage showing Capital police escorting him around the building and leading a prayer on the Senate floor. https://nypost.com/2023/03/06/jan-6-footage-shows-cops-bringing-qanon-shaman-to-senate-floor/

Jan. 6 footage shows Capitol cops escorting QAnon Shaman to Senate floor Newly revealed surveillance footage from Jan. 6, 2021, shows two Capitol police officers escorting Jacob Chansley, the be-horned so-called “QAnon Shaman” who has come to symbolize the riot. nypost.com

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@AmericaShaman Jacob Chansley repeats President Trump's request for protesters to peacefully go home.

@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump

Wait - you mean to tell us that the #J6 UnSelect Committee NEVER SHOWED THIS VIDE 😱, where Jacob Chansley was actually repeating Trump’s request to peacefully go home 😲 And now we find out that the Committee deleted 100+ encrypted files just days before Republicans took control of the House in 2023 😳

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

👀FBI Director Christopher Wray refuses to answer: - whether there were confidential human sources embedded w/in Jan 6 protestors. - whether there were confidential human sources dressed as Trump Supporters INSIDE the capital prior to doors being opened. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCIj7J5wNWc

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@PamelaEdwards and i are polar opposites on Jan 6 but i missed some stuff due to the Jan 6 Committee's emotionally manipulative & deceptively edited propaganda. they added MUSIC ffs! here's a well compiled Jan 6 thread from a different perspective:

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Nancy Pelosi & daughter were ready for Jan 6. her daughter was recording it. wonder why...? could it have anything to do w Nancy calling off extra security & protection President Trump offered? This part of the thread will look into Pelosi's actions & motivations.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Nancy Pelosi’s daughter filmed every move w an entire crew. How would she know to do that? Pelosi declined additional security 4 Capitol Building. Why? Jan 6 committee established BY Pelosi doctored footage, withheld footage, then DELETED evidence.…

@PinoAmericano - Pino Americano

Nancy Pelosi’s daughter filmed every move with an entire crew. How would she know to do that? Nancy Pelosi declined additional security for the Capitol Building. Why? The J6 committee established by Nancy Pelosi doctored footage, withheld footage and then deleted evidence. Why?

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

i'll add more info w sources, including link to @RobGouveiaEsq breaking down Trump's DC Jan 6 hearing, where we found out Biden's Admin & Jan 6 Committee DELETED HUNDREDS of hours of footage, interviews & testimonies. they said it's LOST oops. u don't "lose" anything on purpose🤔

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Jan 6 cops shot pepper spray guns at protestors B4 breech. KARMA kicks in as the wind blows the spray back in their faces. coughing & choking ensues. COPS ATTACKED FIRST. ONLY injury in this video, a cop coughing from the pepper spray, was self-inflicted.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

For nearly 3 years--the media, DOJ, judges, and govt witnesses have lied about how the police line fell on the west side. A combination of police ineptness/excessive force prompted most of the violence that day. 2:25pm: "Put it up in the fucking scaffolding"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Status of our trucks? Well, they were in there. "We can't hold this. We're gonna get too many fucking people hurt." "Look at this fucking vantage point, man. We're fucked." "Listen to me, man. We're gonna have to make a tactical disadvantage move out here, and we're gonna get people seriously fucking hurt, man." We got 20,000 people. "We can't stop him." "Where's the hurt? I don't know, but we need to fucking make a decision." "We don't need to get our people fucking killed, man." "I can't hold him." "I got him." "We're hitting stairs. Okay? Hitting stairs. Keep walking. I got him. I got him. Keep walking."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hope Alex and Christina are up there. Where'd they go? Back to truck What's the status over there? Yeah. Yeah. What's the status of our trucks? Well, they were in there. Put you on the west side or east side. Hey, Jimmy. Backshaw. Come here. Backshaw. Backshaw, come here. We can't hold this. We're gonna get too many fucking people hurt. Look at this fucking vantage point, man. We're fucked. Listen to me, man. We're gonna have to make a tactical disadvantage move out here, and we're gonna get people seriously fucking hurt, man. We got 20,000 people. We can't stop him. Where's the hurt? I don't know, but we need to fucking make a decision. We don't need to get our people fucking killed, man. Agree. Look at that. Look at that. We're gonna have a search. Heads up. God fucking damn it. Hey. Hey. Watch yourself. There we go. I don't know yet. I don't know yet. I can't hold him. Jimmy. Jimmy. Hey. Jimmy, come on me. I gotta get back here. I know. I'm getting out of this room. I got him. I got him. I got him. Come on, Jimmy. We're hitting stairs. Okay? Hitting stairs. Keep walking. I got him. I got him. Keep walking. Keep walking.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

a few seconds before cops start shooting pepper balls and spray the Jan 5 protestors w tear gas - they KNEW it would make the crowd angrier and the situation more dangerous - they did it anyway.

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

January 6th video: The Capitol Police knew that they were hitting "innocent people" with "a lot of pain compliance" (explosives/gas) and that it was multiplying the number of angry protesters. They kept doing it anyways...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The risk? What do we got if we can help? We we nothing's gonna help. The wind is not us. No. We're we're fucked. Right. The wind's not us, and we we get hit with And and not only that, we're taking out one and ten of them are getting way angrier. It's it's we're multiplying them by hitting them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The risk? What do we got if we can help? We we nothing's gonna help. The wind is not us. No. We're we're fucked. Right. The wind's not us, and we we get hit with And and not only that, we're taking out one and ten of them are getting way angrier. It's it's it's we're multiplying them by hitting them.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@zadokq244514 - Zadok 💫

January 6th “insurrection” Deep State Psyop. The January 6th “insurrection” Was a Deep State Psyop. (Also actors revealed) Jan 6 #jan6 #Jan6thInsurrection #January6th #proudboys #LEAKED #deepstate #Insurrection @GenFlynn

Video Transcript AI Summary
This documentary-style investigation presents the January 6 Capitol riot as a staged production with crisis actors and kayfabe cops. Footage is attributed to Data (Young Kim) licensed to RMG News, BlazeTV’s Elijah Schafer, and photographers like John Minkelow, Savannah Hernandez, Amanda Andrade Rhodes, and Vincent; mentions "fake crisis actors" and "kayfabe cops" throughout. It describes “barrier ballet” and “barricade dance” at obstacle one and obstacle two, “fake arrests,” “fake National Guard,” and “sergeant Pepper.” It alleges background actors are “paid protesters” and that scenes were “dressed” with “blood” and “wound sealer” and “peroxide.” It notes photographers capturing the action “for optics,” with footage licensed to TMZ and the New York Post. It mentions deaths—Kevin Greeson and Benjamin Phillips—and teases act three, “the January 6 fakesurrection.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Best on constitution. And then we're coming back from our little photoshoot where Stephen Nelson, DC reporter for the New York Post, is gonna take this footage. And thank you, Stephen, for the time stamps. And now one of our stars, Taylor Hanson, files in with the PBs, being led by a bunch of photographers. Notice the cop escort on the right. The guy in a scooter is Eddie Block, who has a shady pass, but we don't have time for that. So now they're gonna turn left onto first. Speaker 1: Where's that Speaker 0: people? Oh, now they're getting into character. Now they're gonna take a pit stop on first in Constitution. They're just waiting around, getting their breakfast, and what could they be waiting for? Oh, hey. Look. It's Data. Who turns out to be the Ugandan born slash USC School of Cinematic Arts videographer, Young Kim, who works under his Rise Images banner. But the footage he captures today will be licensed to RMG News, who were the consultants and technical advisors for the 2014 film Nightcrawler, which is about an amateur cameraman who deceives, manipulates, and exploits everyone who stands in the way of his money shot. Let's check-in with the West Side of the capital. And it looks like we have some actors waiting outside in the cold and waiting for everybody to show. And remember this guy, we'll call him the Unabomber. Speaker 1: I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building. Speaker 0: You know they're there already. And I'll be there with you. No, he won't. So now the PBs are wrapping up their little breakfast. Now Amy's gonna walk ahead so she can get photographs of them walking by. Just like this. Making their grand entrance down First Street. And now it's cave fave galore. Remember this guy, William Pepe. And now they're synced up with all the other actors. And now they've arrived, and now we can proceed. And look at all these people just waiting for them. Alright. Go join all your KFAB friends. Now mayor Muriel Bowser and chief Conti have talked extensively about all the force and backup that they're gonna call to prevent something like this. So let's take a look at our first line of defense. You've got to be shitting me. Is that a side ponytail? Background actors. Crazy lady number two just shouting at them because that's her job. I know it's hard to look at this. Where's Getting the photos. Where's Speaker 1: that that people? Speaker 0: Creating a narrative. Speaker 1: Where's that people? Speaker 0: Fake as crisis actors. We'll call this guy GIK or kayfabe. So now Ryan Samsle's gonna whisper sweet nothings to Joe Biggs. There's Victor Blue. And there's Sabrina Tavernan. Getting the pictures. We'll see later. Shooting the Babbit death sequence. Yep. Just waiting for the showdown. So now they've all pulled at the entrance of the Pennsylvania Walkway. And right away, Ryan Samsall gets the command to approach and makes a beeline towards obstacle one, and everyone follows him. Whoopsie woos. You know where the cast of Pacific Blue is waiting for him? Notice how they already have their hands up, which we learned all about in act one. And this footage was captured by everyone's favorite BlazeTV's Elijah Schafer. Get a good look at these cops, guys. Notice how they're already grouped, spaced out, and in line. And here you have happy because she's happy for hours. As we come into obstacle one, Samsul checks back to see that he's not alone. Notice how the plastic liner is still laying out. Alright. We've got cop two Speaker 1: from our Speaker 0: previous video, pretending to phone it in. It is indeed a side ponytail. No. Please don't do that. Everybody's just laughing, hanging out. Look at this cop. He's laughing with the guy, shooting the shit. Never knew an insurrection could be so funny. And over here, it's the barricade dance. The only game they really have other than the awful chanting. Looks great for camera. You gotta keep the actors busy. Now Sam Soul dramatically taking off the jean jacket that he's gonna throw to the ground and never retrieve. That's not normal. Now Epps comes up to Sam Soul. We know what a wonderful k fabe actor Epps is. He's just whispering for the dramatic effect. Back and forth, and no one has a weapon. And now we have miss Barbie to the right, who turns out to be Caroline Edwards, who is one of our stars during the June 2022 Capitol hearing. You're Speaker 1: fired. Whoo. Speaker 0: That sounded real. And Barbie hangs on, and here the momentum catapults Barbie's right shoulder into the rail, injuring her. So you could see Samson put his hands up to his head. He fucked up. That wasn't supposed to happen. And so now, look, they just come around breaking character to check on her, which is nice, which tells me he could be the controller of this scene. They don't want anybody actually hurt. I know that may sound contradicting. The purpose is not to harm each other. The purpose is to get dramatic photos and video. So they're just grabbing. What the hell are they doing? The cop got a headlock and a cop? Hey. I have this cop come down. Can we call him Enrique? Look. He's just fighting the air. If you know anything about stage combat, it looks just like this. It's just the game of slap and tickle. And this cop just pushes him. He just pushes his head down. God. You guys couldn't get better actors than these Keystone cops? And to our right, we're doing a little remodeling. And now they all start to pour in. Teamwork. So now Tony just makes his way up the stairs because he's our wonderful k fave cheerleader. Put a little bit more into it, side ponytail. Give me something. No facial expressions. Expressions. Just Just nothing. Nothing. Because she is dead inside. And they just retreat, and they defeat obstacle one in less than a minute. Didn't even put up a fight. And they just scatter like the terrible actors they are. And they're making their way up. Speaker 2: Making their way downtown. Walking fast on the grass, and they're tramp out. Speaker 1: Look at Shafer Speaker 2: ahead. Just making his way, Speaker 1: making his way through the crowd. Whoo. We'll breach the line. We need backup. This is now supposed to play a riot. Speaker 2: USA, stop the steal. They shot and killed her. Speaker 0: Really not that hard to break down their body language, people. So now we're reaching obstacle two. So now Barbie's limping because she was really hurt. Yes. Sometimes people get hurt. Sometimes people throw real punches. Maybe not today. Look inside ponytail. Because she checks to see if she broke a nail. These are not cops. Yo. Wake the up. Speaker 1: My question is, I'm I'm with the press. I'm in here. But what what what Speaker 0: What what what today, Junior? Speaker 1: What is what is gonna happen? I'm in limitations here on federal property. Speaker 0: Just k fiving away, Elijah. Gotta sound all right now. Not really making any sense. Speaker 1: I'm just fuck it. Speaker 0: And she doesn't say anything because she's not a real cop. She's a side ponytail. Are you listening, side ponytail? You're terrible. So is no one gonna point out the obvious here? That's okay. We'll do it. We have to do everything around here anyway. Guys, if BlazeTV sends a reporter out to DC for the very purpose of capturing Trump's speech, which won't be over for another fifteen minutes, but instead is the first human in all of the world to be standing at the gates of obstacle two? This guy knew it was gonna happen. Just like all of our fake Trump supporters, our fake rent a cops, and our very faint photographers and reporters. I mean, what else would you call this if not an inside job? Speaker 3: There's this crazy thing that's called journalism ing. Ugh. Let me break down what you saw there. As people started ripping down the barriers, these were just Trump supporters. They were angry. Do you believe that that many people would come and would breach the Capitol Building? My brain kind of broke in this moment because I haven't gotten sad at one of these things in a long time. I've never breathed so much tear gas in my life. My body is full of hives. My neck and my face are burned. I can't eat food. I've been vomiting all day. My own saliva hurts my throat. It's very painful. Speaker 0: Now there's a special place in hell for gaslighting narcissists like this. Back at obstacle two Don't Speaker 1: go right here. Speaker 0: Our k cops are just kayfabe and chill, and now they just pull the barricades away. The cops don't do a damn thing. Hey, Pepe. The cops just watch. Look at all this teamwork. And Ryan Samsall takes the lead. Again, what do you think he's gonna go do? And what are these floor signs? Well, cop two does his best cape fading, you know, just standing there. And they're gonna hang here on the Pennsylvania Walkway for a minute, which is exactly how long it takes to defeat obstacle two as Aaron Moustavsky makes his way in. Speaker 1: We're still in a cantaloupe. I have. Speaker 0: Ugh. Now Unabomber's coming into the scene. Oh, just a little nudgey. We'll see this cop, Epps, later. Not to be confused with our captain, Ray Epps. So as they're filing in, we could see these mini fire extinguishers on top of these plastic fire mates already set out. Here's Victor Blue. Speaker 1: This is my job for you. Speaker 0: Good job, Pepe. I like your radio. Speaker 1: What in the hell? They're just filing in. You can catch people with fans. We will eat sorrow. Speaker 0: What for your paycheck? Silly. You have to complete the job first, and they'll hire just about anyone. See this black fence here? We'll see this come down in about two minutes, and it comes out like butter. So as we're coming into the scene, Ryan Samso goes up to Barbie and apologizes again, but she looks pissed. It looks like Ryan gets defensive. Alright. Someone's getting fake arrested in the back. And here we have Infowars turned Elijah Schaefer cohost, Savannah Hernandez. Doing some journalism ing. Speaker 1: Wow. Wow. Wow. Look what Speaker 0: the cat dragged in. Sabrina Tavernes, complete with her helmet, looking unsure. How would she know to bring a helmet? And this guy is photojournalist John Farina. There were cops doing some Meisner. They're just all standing around not really sure what to do. They're buying time. They need everybody to fill this space. These people are still coming. Remember this blue tape. And they just file right in. Another fire extinguisher. This whole time they have guns, but they never used them. Enrique and Camel trying to make love. I'll put them all in. Something tells me that Camel is ex military. No. No. God. Imagine waking up to that every morning. So here's the fake arrest. Tay Tay and Savannah getting it all right in front of Laffy, who's still laughing. And these black crates, in case you were wondering, contain audio equipment and loudspeaker systems rented from MSI or Maryland Sound International. Notice how all these guys know to chant the same thing? Speaker 1: It's our house. Woah. We're so bad like here we come. Speaker 0: Oh, Tay Tay and Savannah swapping dick pics. I have Aaron in the background. K vaping is little Jewish heart out. Emphasis son little. Nordeen, get in some takate. We'll call this cop Carl. And now we're gonna remove the black fence. Boom. Comes right out. Speaker 1: Let's go. Speaker 0: As they file into the Lower West Plaza. And this dollar general fence easily snaps for your convenience. And here you have John and Amy Schubert, who we like to call freedom, and they just walk on through. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's move a little faster, people. Speaker 0: Hey, Tappy. And look at all these crisis actors behind them. Back on the West Lawn, this footage comes from town hall reporter Julio Rosas, who wasn't tipped off about this at all. Would really love to know what's happening under that tent. Oh, all the hard work they put into lining that fence. And they just walk right in. Chief Conti, where are all your men? Sure does bring new light to the word acting chief. These are still actors, guys. With that many people involved, somebody would have said something to the news. Now they come in. They're making their way towards the Southwest scaffolding with camel leading them. God, Epps put a little more into it. What do you think is going to happen right now? Where do you think they're going? Another fire extinguisher. I know it's cold guys, but this is gonna be in the history books. No one seems so rehearsed. Oh, someone's knocked over a fire extinguisher. Wonder what it'll be used for. Speaker 1: Nordine, are you drunk? It's okay if you are. Speaker 0: Maybe it'll just add more to your character. Side ponytail. She's like a wallflower. Now this guy right here is corn, and he's the star of the scene that's about to take place. Notice this guy in the background. He runs, and then he slows down his cop too. Supposed to give him a gentle hug. Just brings him back into the scene. And where's Major going? I'm gonna tell you what they're doing in just a second. Speaker 1: Listen to Speaker 0: what this old guy says. Speaker 1: Go ahead and push me down. Push me down. Push me me down. Down. Speaker 0: Did you hear what he said? Go ahead and push me down. Play into me. What do you think, folks? Speaker 1: I'm ready to spray. Speaker 0: They're getting ready to spray. Speaker 1: What are they summoning the powers of Speaker 0: miss Cleo? Everyone's psychic. Notice the cooler. Notice the lumber in the background. Notice his bag of trash or bag of props. Got Unabomber trading beauty secrets. We'll call this guy here doctor t. Here, we're about to unveil one of our smoking guns. Notice the pile of lumber sitting here. It will be used later. Now watch this. Insert bull. Speaker 1: I can't debate. We got more people coming up. Let's get them down here in that last one to crack. Speaker 0: Or what's left of it. And bull is our stunt guy who turns out to be 33 year old Iraq war veteran, Landon Kenneth Copeland. And he probably charges a lot Speaker 1: because we only have him Speaker 0: for twenty minutes. And that's our cop major who just brought him in. Now as our cops are bringing Bull in, we're gonna have a little Turkish delight. A little mini scene to warm up the kids. Get that shot, Adam. He's gonna climb to the top. What do you think is gonna happen? It's just a little mini show to get everybody in the spirit, and they take him down. And it probably deserves as some type of distraction. We're gonna see little mini shows later. And here's a guy who tried to go in earlier, taking the knee. Notice this guy in the black, kayfabe. Like he got maced. So this guy escorts him away from this area. He's the one who came in with bull. Notice the ladder and the cones in the background. We'll see those later. And now they bring Turkish delight down with a big shit eating grin on his face. The main crowd ain't even come yet. Speaker 4: Yeah. And they won't Speaker 0: for another forty five minutes. So here, Bull makes his way into the crowd, Speaker 1: but he doesn't know where to go. Speaker 0: So he's gonna come back and ask for directions. Door opens. You'd think they'd lock it. You'll notice later that the Northwest scaffolding, you know, the only side that they go up, doesn't have its doors on the outside. Getting his lunch. Speaker 1: Like, you're having a blast. Looks like you're having a blast. Speaker 0: I guess that's a noob. And now Bull knows where to go. Speaker 1: Hey. It's Happy. Oh, now the SWAT's coming in. Look at all these fat cops. Speaker 0: You know who paid for all of this. Right? We did. And Q's right behind them. Oh, someone's late to the show. Get a good look at these cops. Barbie's in the background taking a break for this brand new fire extinguisher. And Q's just gonna walk right up the steps while Nick Quested gets all of it. And they just file right in, hoping their tactical gear stays intact while John Farina double penetrates them with two cameras. Jesus. It's like inbred city. While Sabrina gets all of it. This cop's laughing, and so are they. Speaker 1: Back Back Speaker 0: up because they don't say anything else. Just nothing. Why did they hire her? This guy's standing in front of Data. We'll call him David, and we'll see him later. So everybody's just standing around, waiting. Listen to how quiet it is. What do you think they're all waiting for? So if you are an actor, one of your main jobs is to do this. Pour water into people's eyes. Get used to it. Speaker 1: A fucking country, man. Speaker 0: We never had a country because it isn't a country. It's a corporation and still under Crown Law. Look at these guys just chatting up with the cops. The summoning is part of the show. Oh, there's some backup. Speaker 1: Ready for some K Pave action, boys? Speaker 0: Why do you think Camel's doing such a great job right now? Not only is he ginning up the crowd, there's a shit ton of photographers right behind us. Does anybody know what that patch is? Oh, grandma's kicking him out. Everyone's so polite around here. Speaker 1: Who got their own space? Speaker 0: And that's water boy. We'll see him later. They're still flooding in. Meanwhile, congress begins joint session, certifying the, quote, presidential election results, you know, the main arc at the end of season twenty twenty, as Mikaela Pence steps into the role of Judas. And all of them, just pretending to be completely oblivious to all of the bad acting that's occurring outside of their lair. Outside, let's go live with Patrick on the Maryland Walkway, or as we like to call it, the Southwest Channel. Seems kind of vacant, but we don't see a lot of footage of the Southwest channel. Think about it. Trump told everybody to march on Pennsylvania Avenue, which becomes the Pennsylvania Walkway. In fact, he said Pennsylvania 19 times in his speech. Remember, we believe that Patrick is a real person who doesn't know that he's surrounded by a bunch of actors. Ash experiment, anyone? So as he enters, notice this massive group headed towards us, away from the capital, and in a hurry, where they'll break into pairs, find their placement marks, and faithfully stand because they've been given instructions not to move from that spot until further notice so that when our real folks show, they can fully envelop them. Speaker 1: That's just a spray with our tool for. It's like Speaker 0: Gilbert Godfrey. Now the scriptures duo take their position and begin their bullhorn bible thumping rants. Get a good look at these background actors. We are so honored that they hired us as crisis actors to come here to the capital, and we're gonna blend in with everyone. Oh, natural. We are going to storm the building. Connecticut. Now it's cut to Angel, who's still on the East Side, where they've set up a live screening of Trump's speech. Speaker 1: And I say this, despite Speaker 0: all that's happened, the best is yet to come. Over yonder on the West Side, everybody's just cruising around like this is Lollapalooza or something. Might as well be. Speaker 1: Oh, just a little boop boop. Speaker 0: Now to get you fake arrested. No. The hell? We can't blame these guys. They've never fake arrested somebody before. Oh, there's the cross. Hope they sanded it down. Well, I guess not. G I K, babe. Chatting it up with the cop sees the camera on him and starts malfunctioning. Oh, dear. What happened there? Maybe the power of Christ compelled him. So as a cross crowd surf, why do you Speaker 1: think they've come Speaker 0: up here? Speaker 1: We even know the doctor's doing it. Speaker 0: We're just gonna spoil them for you. There are four reasons why we believe they've come up to this spot. Number one, to have all of our newcomers fill in the space behind us. Two, so they can bring out all the barricades when they push everyone back. Three, so we can buy time with our photographers before all of our real Trump supporters show in forty minutes. Four, and most importantly, to dress the set. Meaning, this backdrop is too pristine for our photographers, and we need to get it a little bloody dingy gringy for our cameras. So let's break it down now. Now Bull has entered the scene, and notice Corn having a little conversation. And not safe for work warning? But while you're watching Corn, you gotta watch Bull too. Now watch what Korn does. He does this little, like, thriller dance, and notice Bull constantly looks in the direction of Korn. So after Korn does his little thriller dance, Bull turns to the right, and he nods, and he bends down, and he just makes his way over to Korn. And he just stands there, and then he puts his arm around him. The story goes is that Korn is shot with a rubber bullet in the cheek, and it pisses Bull off. So let's see if it really happened. This is the impetus that Bull needs to get all riled up because he's our stunt Speaker 1: guy. Now Speaker 0: let's take a look at this blood. Now the color of this blood looks completely different than this, and the spatter here doesn't really resemble a cheek wound. We got a bottle of peroxide in the back, possible. And then they're gonna trample through it. And now you see what we mean by dressing the set. So now Corne just nonchalantly spits the blood capsule into his bottle. And now Melina enters. She just pours water onto the wound. Notice that Corne doesn't even look to see who's doing it. He just expects it. She's the source of all the spatter, dressing the set. Don't put water in your car. And she dumps some more water on the blood. And now he squats, so Samsel and Pudge can treat him. So if you're wondering what that is, it's wound sealer. And when they do these types of drills, they would treat this like a real wound and take a good look at it. And this is what he's gonna look like later. So now he's gonna try to take it out. Speaker 1: No. No. Leave it in there. Just leave it in there. Leave the ball Speaker 0: in there. Now listen to what Molina says. I I I am needs a the medic. She forgot she was the medic. Speaker 1: He needs needs a a medic. I I I I I nothing. Notice Speaker 0: the radio, and unlike Biggs, not for optics. Makes you wonder why they would have wound sealer and peroxide on them. Jesus. Now this footage was taken by Data. Unfortunately, this is all we have to piece together. And all of the footage that people have, there's cuts in it with the exception of Jaden. Just checking in, does this look real? Does that look real? Getting all the pictures. This fake cop, we'll call him Trapper. Notice his nameplate is missing as he exaggerates a dramatic muffled monologue. You can see Melina holds up a can of Woundcept Plus because she's gonna disinfect him. Speaker 1: Do that. Speaker 0: But she doesn't. She doesn't take him anywhere. And you can see Korn tilt his blood bottle, and Chief just watches along. They're just buying time. And remember, Korn has a big photoshoot later, while Nick Quested gobbles it up with two cameras. So this cop's gonna bend down to check on Korns, keep spitting in that bottle, because we're gonna use that later. And now the cop attempts to escort him, but he's intercepted by Samson. I'm with them. Ugh. Okay. This isn't a league of their own. Speaker 1: Let's get rid of the cafe. Speaker 0: Samson, less fake anger and background. Oh, I can't believe it, JR. Speaker 1: This is your fucking people. Bladens. How are you? Speaker 0: I love bull. Speaker 1: He's the Speaker 0: best one here because he's a method actor and fake cop trapper pretending to do something. So now we're gonna do a round of slap and tickle. This is how this works. They play fight for a little, get all the shots, and then take a break. Okay. We see Cor in there, and they're just stepping all up in the blood, creating transfer patterns. Oh, somebody brought the silly string, and now we're gonna see why we call him Bull. See how he comes into the scene anticipating the impact with his back arched as he charges into them. Now it gets even better, but let's just pause it right there. So we see Carm here, whose real name is Joshua Matthew Black, who released a YouTube video, which has since been removed two days after the shit show. And in this video, he tells us that he was protecting a capital officer who had been pepper sprayed and fallen to the ground. And that's when he was hit in the cheek with a plastic projectile. But we know that's not true because he was already shot. Looking like a piece of corn or a vintage toy gun pellet. But it should be noted that these types of wound applications are readily producible. So here's the scene of him protecting the cops. Don't hurt him. Don't hurt him. Did you hear that crunch? That's his blood bottle. Don't Speaker 1: hurt him. Speaker 0: Oh god. And Bull gets in another shove. Back to Larch. Speaker 1: Don't tase me, bro. Speaker 0: Don't tase me, bro. Hey. Remember that viral phrase from the 2007 University of Florida incident where police tased Andrew Meyer for asking John Kerry if he was a member of the skull and bones fraternity, which he is. Three two two, baby. Speaker 1: Oh, watch out for sneakies. Speaker 0: While this cop signals for a reset. So look at this cop. We'll call him lieutenant. Now where do you think he's going right now? Looks like he's going over to Bull, but he stopped by falafel. Who's this? Cringe. So now he goes over to Bull to direct them to a new setup to his right, and he says, okay. And now lieutenant pushes the guy, and they're k fading away for all the cameras. Victor Blue just blocking us, just trampling all up in that blood. Speaker 1: I don't know what happened. Speaker 0: Yeah. Tell us what happened. Speaker 1: God bless America. God bless America. Speaker 0: No. It's like they use a strawberry popsicle for that blood. Speaker 1: God gave us freedom. Speaker 0: Okay. And thank you for that. At the same time, doctor T gives instructions to a cop, and you can see the barricades have been placed on Speaker 1: the South Side, where a lot Speaker 0: of our crisis actors have moved down next to the Media Tower. So while they're resetting, let's see what's happening on Pennsylvania Avenue. And here's one of our stars, the face of the proverbial shit show, Jacob Chansley, just leading all our actors to the set, loving that camera, getting that attention, because he knows he's our main fall guy. Speaker 1: He is one of those paid protesters that travels around. Taking their blood, eating our babies. Speaker 0: Well, that's true. Speaker 2: We're not Speaker 1: doing this full Donald Trump. We're doing this for the constitution. It's for the future of our republic. Hope you guys will all stand with us. Thank you. Speaker 5: Baby, why is Hot Wheels over here talking about some stand with him? Baby, where are we standing? Woo. Speaker 0: Back on the main stage. Speaker 1: And then late in the evening, boom, these explosions of bullshit. Together, we will drain the Washington swamp. Speaker 0: No. You won't. You had four years to do that. Didn't arrest any of them. Speaker 1: Let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue. I wanna thank you all. God bless you, and God bless America. Thank you all for being here. This is incredible. Speaker 0: Really? And nothing concludes Trump's legacy. And a song about a gay bathhouse. We're the least guy. At the same time God. There is a new world order, and it's well on its way. And full disclosure, we have a bit of neutrality bias when it comes to Jonesy. And like most free thinkers who begin their descent down the rabbit hole, you were likely to run into this guy along your path. Throughout And the years, he was someone in your corner, and you cheered him on until one day you realized that he is the epitome of controlled opposition. And more on him later later. Scab. It's a grand high witch. Scab. It's the cast of Saturnia. Only closer Tony Danza. Look at Speaker 1: all these Speaker 0: Freemasons. Scab. Now the real people come. The authentic people who accept this one. Here's one of our main stars, Ashley Babbitt. Speaker 6: There's an estimated over 3,000,000 people here today. Speaker 0: No. There's not. What are you smoking? You know what we find interesting about this livestream? It was licensed and sold to TMZ. How'd you guys manage to do that postmortem? Interesting. And now the crack pack and their disciples make their way to set. Back on the West Side, where we're having a little barricade ballet. Get it? Get it? Get it, bull? Guys, I want you to Speaker 1: pretend that that's your paycheck. Speaker 0: You'd think there was gold in those barricades. Jesus, they're they're all like Rent is barricade, precious? Speaker 1: And let's give a round of applause for Bull. Speaker 0: Because he's done. Now this guy's gonna signal to stop while they drag this guy away. Like a scene from Nightmare on Elm Street. Oh, there's Kano getting wild and just loving every minute of it. What is happening while our sneaky photographers get her done? Get those pics. Oh, no. It's Cronus, which means a death has taken place. Benjamin Phillips, founder of Trumperoo, who organized a bust of Trump supporters from Pennsylvania to DC. Several people called Phillips' cell phone when he failed to arrive after the shit show is over. And one of those calls was answered by Washington police, who told them that Phillips had suffered a stroke while he was looking for a parking space and died at George Washington University Hospital, per Francisco Diaz, who will become our chief medical examiner in twenty two days. To complicate matters, Phillips' obituary will not be released for another four months. So let's see what transpired. So here at obstacle two, they've plopped this redneck archetype here next to these padded modular mats. Just taking it all in. When all of a sudden, a flock of folks, including our obstacle two barricade remover, Phillips North on a barricade stretcher. Notice there's a person on top performing CPR. And remember these two, fake National Guard and Sergeant Pepper, followed by photographer Chris Jones, this cop, we'll call Legs, and Time Magazine photographer Christopher Lee. Here we have our background swat, fresh from holding as they scattered to make way for Phillips. But Taylor Hansen claims that Phillips died after he suffered a direct hit from a grenade. And this is a regular guy with a face shield just riding around on a hoverboard. So now our SWAT comes into the scene followed by Chris Jones and, oh, Marini Staub from our kayfabe flight when what? Another one? Uh-oh. Who is it, boy? Kevin Greeson. Greeson, a 55 year old father of five from Alabama who worked at the Goodyear Tire Plant in Decatur, had a history of high blood pressure and in the midst of the excitement, suffered a heart attack. According to his wife, she was on the phone with him when he actually died and spoke with the person who attempted to resuscitate him. To make matters worse, post circulating on Twitter and Facebook claimed that while Greason attempted to steal a portrait in the capital, suffered a heart attack after he repeatedly tased himself in the scrotum. So let's see how it went down. Speaker 1: Look at Speaker 0: this one pretending to be on the phone and ask anyone who's there. Did you have service? So they're trying to give CPR to Kevin Greason. I want you to notice where everyone is standing just for placement. So they're gonna take him away. And the guy carrying him, just smiling. Speaker 1: Make a hole. Speaker 0: Make a hole. Ugh. I had a dollar. So they put him down and do it again. It's the same people. This is still Tyler Baggins' footage, who, by the way, sold his footage to Storyful and licensed to the New York Post. Remember that blue tape? So this tells us they're right by Obstacle 2 by the Northwest entrance. Speaker 1: National Guard out here. Speaker 0: That's not the National Guard, y'all. Tyler Baggins still lying through his crooked teeth. And now they take him away. Hurting to wonder where they're going. So now they clear some space because they're gonna set him down again one last time. And look. Big National Guard and sergeant Pepper are here to assist. Again, what is going on? And Legs is there too. Hey, it's Dilly. So now they bring out the Stryker Pro XT stretcher as the DC fire department attends to him. For clarity, we're not here to argue the fates of Greason and Phillips. But what are the chances that both of these men died of heart attacks in the same location at the same time and aided by the same people? Could they take him and the defibrillator away on a stretcher trolley as fake National Guard and sergeant Pepper lend a helping hand again? Now let's do north and check-in with angel walk because we're gonna do a quick perimeter sweep. Oh, now they've erected the hydraulic wedge barriers. Oh, so that's where our real cops are. Speaker 1: Let him go. Speaker 0: As award winning filmmaker and six time Emmy nominated writer director, Michael Negro makes his way to set back to Angel. Yep. Just waiting around in the cold for further instructions. Oh, we'll see him later. Look at this shopping cart of goodies. Because you're not coming to set without a Trump hat or a Trump flag as Angel enters the Southwest Channel. Speaker 1: Keep moving up right there. Love our left. We need everybody filling those holes so they can see us. Speaker 0: And you'll see why the Southwest Channel is so important for harboring our actors. See how they're all paired, placed in space. Yep. Just frozen like their souls. Speaker 1: Ready to mix in with the real Speaker 0: Trump supporters. Even after ten minutes, our bible friends are still here. Speaker 1: My brother, I want to have visionary mother of god. Jesus. Look who it is. Speaker 0: Bull on a phone call, looking all haggard. And look at this family on their marks. There's so much room to go in, but they just stand around like the zombies they are. So let's go in further. Oh, we've got some Oscar winning performances. Roger. At the same time, David there living his best lie. And this footage comes from photographer foe, Benjamin Diaz, who has a lot of experience capturing these staged events. Oh, and now our photographer joins us. Now Benjamin's gonna elicit some commentary from this man child. Speaker 1: Things that we should be focusing on antifa spraying them and not us. Speaker 0: What? More narrative building from children. Speaker 1: We will not bend. We will not break. Cringey. Take a look at these people. Cringey. Speaker 0: Who the hell is that? Remember this one. Bono and David's run out of things to do. Look at this guy. Just pop the gate right out, and they strike it, removing it from the set. La la la. So now David's on his speakerphone. Listen to what he says. Speaker 1: All the way is up like, a mile back. Speaker 0: And back to the main stage. And now Kano brings out his best men. Oh, just a little nudgey. Speaker 1: Who's gonna tell the fuck you have? Whoo. Speaker 0: When translated into k fave, that's just a little tickle. Now another round of bury the treasure as we your focus to the camera crew. You know, the ones who capture the lie and then packaged and sent out to you for your attention. Speaker 1: And it Speaker 0: works every time. Snap. Snap. Okay. You see this woman in the background picking up hats and gloves? When they break, she goes around and clears the clutter from the front lines. So we don't want anyone to slip and hurt themselves. Hey. It's fight cop from act one. Speaker 1: Open your eyes. Speaker 0: Yeah. Open your eyes, Americans. And here, Amy Harris giving a little love tap to John Minkelow, who reciprocates, because they're all friends just like the Republicans and Democrats. And this is a big reunion for all of our photographers, while Julio Rosas, yeah, we see you, looks for a more deceptive angle. And in comes water boy waving his flag. Might be on the spectrum. And this cop's just laughing. Audience, please tell me, do these cops look like they fear for their lives? What is this? Edie from Grey Gardens? Oh, you know who this is recording? Such a friendly insurrection. Still giggling like a little schoolgirl. Oh, he's got the rosary out. Now I just need some garlic. Yeah. Just smiley Savannah over here. Speaker 1: Why do Speaker 0: you think he's posing with the rosary like that? Alright. Let's pause it right there for some context. Speaker 1: You are evil. Speaker 0: Egypt 2012. Speaker 1: What do you Speaker 2: think this is? Speaker 1: What do Speaker 0: you think they're doing? Oh, getting the pictures. That's right. It's a KFADE photoshoot. And every time you see these kind of pictures like this abroad, they're all staged. All of them. I mean, Afghanistan Taliban revival. Look. This guy forgot to die. Yeah. Holding the Bible open. Oh, so sad. Notice how all the signs are in English. It's because it's for you. And you'll notice here that Morsi's name is misspelled twice. And upon further investigation, all of the protest signs appear to have been created by one person. We're gonna protest until the return of the legitimate president. Sound familiar? And here's some context for your context. Morsi had won Egypt's presidential elections in 2012, and by decree, had expanded his presidential authority and removed judicial review of his decrees, which was approved in referendum with 33% of the electorate voting. 33. There's that number again. The opposition claimed fraud in the process and called for an inquiry. Jeez. Where'd you hear that before? This resulted in, quote, violent clashes between pro and anti Morsi protesters. And six months later saw the end of Morsi's presidency. Got the fake blood while the doctor checks the pulse. I bet there's one there. Later, Egyptian prosecutors charged Morsi. And during a court hearing on espionage charges, Morsi's final words were, my country is dear even if it oppressed me, and my people are honorable even if they were unjust to me. He collapsed a minute later and died. Nope. Not sketchy at all. Wonder if he was Epstein. I'm just kidding. That guy's still alive. These staged protests complete with crisis actors are happening in every country, every single day. Allah Akbar, why? Guys, these people are poor, and they don't know what they're doing. Now do you see how these picture poses relate to our capital friend? Same shit, different countries, same cabal. And there's your context. Back to the clown show. Speaker 1: You are able. Speaker 0: So now we're on the East Side of the capital. We ain't much going on, but we have some actors waiting. And back on the West Side, the camera pans to reveal blue, unmask. Speaker 1: Are you listening, Gateway Pundit? So this is Speaker 0: our time to get some really brutal shots before all of our real Trump supporters show up. Because after this, they're gonna send all of our actors down into the courtyard area. Notice how no one reacts to the maze because it's water. This guy's job is to just wave the flag back and forth. This is not a Wim Hof meditation. You want to. Oh, god. Oh, pudge getting up in there. Speaker 1: We ain't talking in these fries. Speaker 0: Listen to what these two frat guys say. Speaker 1: You fucking pepper spray us. Beat us. You fucking stump ass. Oh. No. You guys are too pathetic. Speaker 0: It's all fake, guys. And look at these brand new sweatshirts. Devil horns. Excuse me. How is it? How is it? Oh, Unabomber. Little fruity in the booty. Speaker 1: Hey. Welcome to the front of the fucking line. Come here. Oh, Speaker 0: Tay taking the initiative. Speaker 1: He needs medical. Oh. He's gonna need medical. Speaker 0: Oh. Card. Looks like you have a little something in your cheek. Listen to what this cop says. Anticipating some water sports. Speaker 1: This kid's gonna make a hole in your lip real permanent. Speaker 0: Oh, shouldn't that sting a bit? Look at this guy, Edie the water boy. Like he's fighting his demons. We need a barricade over here, guys. Look, they're just standing around. Lot of waiting around, guys. Well, forgot your taser, bro. And here, have it back. So let's see what happens if someone's injured. Oh, grandpa down. Grandpa up. Grandpa. Grab your stuff. Where are we going? That's right, guys. If you are injured, you will be removed from the set. Yeah. Give me a medic. Yeah. Get him a medic, and they're gonna repurpose him. Background actor down. Oh, look at this guy. We'll call, fisted. This is pathetic. Got it. Photo by John Minklow. Speaker 1: Give me another one. Give me another one. Speaker 0: Yeah. Just give him that fluoridated spritz. Come on. Well, grandma's down too. Quite literally. And if you're wondering what that is in his pocket, great controversy. The untold story behind the Vatican's rising influence in America. Yeah. Satanism. And now they take her away. It's a beautiful wig. And just like that, the grandparents are out. Sponsored by Deer Park. Speaker 1: They're not damn sassy enough. Speaker 0: That's what I keep saying. Speaker 1: Fucking couch. Speaker 0: Brian Sam's so eager for attention because that's his job. A man down driving Rhodes getting in the scene while he gets a selfie with Tay Tay. Speaker 1: My wife's gonna come today. Speaker 0: As Data pants to Tay Tay. Speaker 1: I'm feeling great out here. Speaker 0: Okay, Carson. Speaker 1: It's going wonderful. Wonderful? It feels great. Speaker 0: Bet those dollar signs coming your way are pretty great too. Speaker 1: America. Trangent. This is what real journalism is right here. What do you Speaker 0: mean by real? And now he's off to Amy. Speaker 1: How are you doing today? Speaker 0: Yeah, Amy. How's your conscience holding out? Speaker 1: Oh, I recognize you from Portland. Speaker 0: And she shakes her head. You know you're not supposed to be talking to her, Tay Tay. Speaker 1: Hey. Speaker 0: And she ignores him. And he plays off the disc by repeating this narrative. Speaker 1: We got Antifa here too. We got Antifa and Trump supporters within the same vicinity here for the same thing. Speaker 0: You see this Antifa arrows bit on the screen? Well, this footage belongs to Taylor Hanson, you know, to implant the narrative. Think people. And that's exactly what's gonna happen. I know they bring out that missing barricade. Edie's still clinging to this water bottle. Speaker 1: Why do Speaker 0: you think he's just standing here? Because he's waiting for all the photographers to show, and here they are. Now they can proceed. Oh, they got the lumber. So they spray him down with a little turmeric water. Now they're gonna hose him down. Hey, geesewine. Tyler Baggins were here. He called this guy national guard who's gotten very clingy with Edie. Yep. Just guiding him around like he's Anne Sullivan. You might have to Google it. Photographers look a little bit inconspicuous while they got corn behind them who's now become an asset. Now here's a classic move. See how he's backing up into the barricade so the cops can push him? Throw yourself to the cops, and they get the shots. As he backs it up, he's offered water. But Edie's like, bro, there's water hidden everywhere. And when you push her, give me a hiya. Put your back into it. Give me a hiya. That's it. All this imitation Bonnie bear has nothing to do. And there's Rachel Powell, who we'll see later. While Savannah hoards it all for herself. Now they're gonna drag him back, like that scene from Ghost. Look at all that fake blood, dressing the set. So they try to take his water away, but he ain't having it because that's his life source. Maybe he has a condition. Maybe he'll make friends with grandpa who has all of the water. Well, let's go down there. Look at this guy in the blue. He's just gonna set the barricade back where it belongs. Now he's gonna pretend like he got sprayed, pours water right over his sunglasses, and then does it again. Aw. He got so serious. John Michelo going down to bring some photog friends up. And look at Pudge and all that k fading. But can you see what's next to him? It's John Michelo. You remember what I said about our photographers being off limits? Well, something unexpected is about to happen to John Michelo. In their storyline, Michelo is literally dragged out from this area because protesters suspect him to be Antifa. But John, with his obvious press badge and cameras, has been there all day. It should also be noted that in six months, Julio Cortez, who's filming this scene, and John Minkelow will both win the Pulitzer Prize for these images. So we believe that John is either in on it or he was set up. You decide for yourself. Y'all remember how to do that? Later. Now it's time for another great reset. And like Biden to a helpless miner, Pudge can't let go. Speaker 1: Let it go. Speaker 0: Let it go. And now BiCop has changed his appearance to the invisible man. Speaker 1: You're a good man, Blue. Say Blue. You're a good man. Speaker 0: Yeah, Pudge. Take a break like Barbie. And below our star kayfabe photog, Brendan Genschwager, Jacob Chanceley has arrived to set as he climbs the media tower. So while our real Trump supporters file in during our reset, let's make some friends. Watch this guy cave vaping his little heart out when he sees the camera on him and self cringes. Oh, getting a little shy in this one. Speaker 1: Freed up. Freed up. Freed up. Speaker 0: Guess she's done? What the hell happened to this guy? That guy must be friends with Karn. You want Speaker 1: a good picture over there with those guys? You're gonna get up. You're gonna get up. You can do it. Speaker 0: You're never too old to deceive the American public. Speaker 1: You are going down. Speaker 0: Yeesh. Okay. Calm down. I love you, boss. I love you. Get a room. Get in the pics. Speaker 1: We're only thinking you got. Speaker 0: So compelling. Speaker 1: We're gay, black, black, black, black. Speaker 0: Much convincing. But more importantly, Speaker 1: who the hell is that? Speaker 0: Wearing shorts in January. And here's my favorite k fave meltdown with David. Speaker 1: They say back to blue. Back to blue. You know what black to blue is? Speaker 4: Tear gas in my fucking eyes. Speaker 1: That's the blue. And Speaker 0: what are Speaker 1: you guys doing? You guys over here. Speaker 4: You're not even fucking reporting on it. Where's the media? Where's CNN? Speaker 0: Where's Fox News? Oh, they're there, brother. Okay. No one's believing you're a Christian. Speaker 1: Who are Speaker 0: you trying to fool, Yamaka? While they're resetting, let's do one more perimeter scan over here. Notice the lumber has increased. Notice this white patio umbrella. Doctor d, having a smoke. Sees the camera and tries to hide it, and then freezes. And here we have a very, very special guest who we'll come back to later. And behind us, we have some fake help coming. Hoorah. So let's follow them in, but we'll take a left where Angel Wash has a surprise for us back on the Southwest channel. Speaker 1: Flashbangs. I don't know. Set off green gas. Speaker 4: Pretty scary. Speaker 0: Notice something? No one's taking any video. That's right. If you're on the Southwest channel, no phones. And our bible bandits. Yep. Still faithfully cemented to their spots. It's an insurrection resurrection. Is there Speaker 1: any copyrights on prayers? I'm not sure. But here comes some Trump, okay. Oh, the giant Trump flag. Speaker 0: And here they come with the giant Trump flag. Who's that? Oh, and there's Bono escorting the flag in. Now they crowd surf the giant flag. Oh, fun. All the way to the cops. There's Bono. Yeah. Teamwork makes the scheme work. And there it is. Another mini show for the kids. Well, that was uneventful. So they've got the ridiculous flag prop. Now they've got them down in the West Plaza like the fake animals they are. Wow. What does this remind you of? Perhaps the UC Davis pepper spray incident during George Soros' controlled Occupy movement in 2011. Could it be? No. Looking at this, doesn't it make you wonder if this was stage two? Good. Notice this TV cameraman getting it all. Interestingly enough, a judge ruled that lieutenant John Pike, who became an overnight viral meme sensation, would be paid 38,000 in workers' compensation benefits to compensate for, quote, the suffering he experienced after the incident, end quote. Meanwhile, each pepper sprayed student received 30 k. When this came out on Facebook, we were so damn mad, but now we kinda wish it was real mace. Now let's move back over to the Washington Monument where Jade Sacker and John Sullivan slash Jaden begin their pilgrimage to the production. Sullivan is one of our major fall guys. You know, the sole reason why people believe Antifa infiltrated the protest. But look how late he's arriving. Speaker 1: They're going inside. They about to break inside that capital building. Speaker 0: Remember, John Sullivan knows what's gonna happen while his lady friend Jade, who's filming Sullivan for an apparent Netflix special, is left in the dark. Speaker 1: They broke inside. Speaker 0: Oh, no. They haven't. They're just waiting for you. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I I wanna play it in too. Oh, yeah. I'm going up. Well, I'm going all the way to the top. Speaker 0: Don't spoil all of it. Now they're gonna get their gear ready here on the Northwest Lawn. Speaker 1: Jade, hold hold this here. No? Alright. Speaker 0: Can't you see she's busy working for Netflix? Speaker 1: Thanks for the help. Speaker 0: Oh, sass. Speaker 1: Mom, give me the gift you say. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I care. Okay. Teenager angst coming from a grown man. Speaker 1: Wait. Do we have a code name? No. Speaker 0: He already does. It's Jaden. So as we make our way up the Northwest Lawn, we discover that there are multiple porta potties, and people are using We even have a sanitation station set up. How accommodating. Not really sure how one can take a shit amongst all the chicanery. So let's go deeper into the belly of the beast. No. I'm not talking about Bill Gates. Oh, what's going on over here? Where's this guy coming from and this guy? Go on. Get up in there, Jade. You're safe because you're surrounded by a bunch of distressed thespians. Speaker 1: Really? Oh, yeah. I knew. You guys gonna come in the building? Speaker 0: We already know the answer. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's go. Speaker 0: Whoops. Spoil alert. Back on the South Side, everyone's just waiting around again, but let's learn how to correctly move someone. So we see these cops leading this man out, and then they release. Yep. More times than not. In the spotlight, we want to escort people in a cave fade fashion. Then when no one's looking, we can drop it. And guess who's over yonder? It's Edie, the water boy, making new friends, still clutching his water. Back on the south set Speaker 1: Hey. Who do you work for? Speaker 0: Uh-oh. They're get you. Notice the Twink Brothers. Notice this cache of water. Notice this cache of water. Speaker 1: Excuse me, sir. Is it true that the mustache holds the flavor in? It definitely has a lot to do. Speaker 0: And there he is, our special guest, Brian D. Cycnik. Look at all healthy and calm as we direct your attention to this cafe photo shoot. Some kind of tug of war with a ratchet strap. I guess that didn't work. Goes the controller of the scene, and they just give up. Now they retreat like the cowardly cops that they are. Now we're gonna play that scene again because you were distracted. See this guy in the background with the umbrella? Yeah. Well, he's not happy with his size, so he's gonna upgrade and snatch up the white patio umbrella while this cub grabs a plank of lumber and hops over the retaining wall. And here, you can see a lot of our actors hanging out over there. But why? Let's take a closer look. Yep. You guessed it. This is the break area, complete with interlocking rubber tiles for your comfort. So when your feet start to hurt, you can come pop a squat. Now let's go center stage. Bless you. Speaker 1: Oh, Liatto's missing her DC patch. Speaker 0: Well, don't look at it. Speaker 1: Well, don't look at his. It is. Don't touch the the gate. Gate. Oh. Speaker 0: Don't touch the gate. Little controller. Don't you look at it. All my cops are patch conscious. Whoopsie woos. So much for those instructions, and they just let them take it. Speaker 1: What are you saying to me, Speaker 0: cop? Probably move back. No, Speaker 1: And that officer's here. Yeah. No shit. Speaker 0: And over here by the Northwest Scaffolding. Oh, now we have a line here. And over here, watch this chick. She grabs the firemate. Oh, and an underhand serve to the center. Amanda Andrade Rhodes getting in the scene. They're gonna set up this little scene for her. Oh, watch out. You know how those capital cops perish so easily. Speaker 1: That guy just threw a fire extinguisher. Speaker 0: Tyler Baggins manipulating, fabricating everything. So watch what she's gonna do. She's gonna throw herself to the wolves. Remember when Edie, the water boy, did this? You throw yourself to the cops, and they get the shots. And she doesn't talk through the whole thing. Makes for good dramatic photos. Speaker 1: The good guys always dress like the bad guys in Star Wars movies. Speaker 0: Cringe. Reset. Woah. Officer, why so Syria? See this hand shoulder action? File that under police tricks, and remember this for act three. Reset. Speaker 1: Take a step back. Speaker 0: Woah. Epps turns out to be a controller, not just an actor. Speaker 1: We're not trying to get people hurt. Speaker 0: That's what we've been saying all along. Back on the East Side, things are cooking up here. Still behind obstacle one, but not for long. Meanwhile, at the Northwest Scaffolding, welcome to obstacle three. That's right. In about thirty seconds, our crisis actors are gonna breach it and climb to the top where they'll meet obstacle five. But first, midway, they must defeat obstacle four. Speaker 1: Let's get ready to kick them. Speaker 0: Yeah. Look alive, everyone. And background. There they go. And they just flutter up. Hey. There's Happy. Look at this guy in the corner, like he's eating a box of bath salts. Yeah. It's a bible and bath salt kind of party. Now watch this guy. Yep. Holding the bible up for the cameras. And there's Hawaii Proud Boys leader, Nick Oakes, who we'll come back to later. And now Jacob Chansley has come down from his tree house and, oh, incoming. Yep. Posing with the rosary. Meanwhile, a cop gives instructions to US Marine Corps war veteran slash digital and forensic reporter, Chris Jones. Speaker 1: What the Speaker 0: hell is that about? Inside, our actors are preparing to overcome obstacle four. Now this footage comes from the New Yorkers veteran war correspondent, Luke Mogulson. Yeah. It's just slap and tickle all over again. What is happening? As data gets it all. Hey. It's lieutenant Trapper and Carl doing nothing. At the same time, notice this cop pops through the tarp to ask Ranger for the knife that's lying here so he can cut it, which will allow more people to enter and further expose the scaffolding to our photographers. Now Ranger's gonna assist him in completing the task at hand. Such a beautifully coordinated insurrection. Oh, low lying lumber. Speaker 1: I've turned my feet down. Speaker 0: Oh. As Dominic Pizzola prepares for his dramatic role as fall guy three. And now they're gonna hold here on obstacle four. Speaker 1: We're not stopping. We're Goddamn it. This is all hell, motherfuckers. Speaker 0: Meanwhile, on the Northwest Lawn, Jonesy instructs his followers from a stage of rental chairs that he paid for. Speaker 1: It's great that this happened. Speaker 0: It's great? Like the police. Oh, what was that? The barristers Speaker 1: have caused a problem. Trump's not gonna come when we've taken this order. Let's march around Speaker 0: Yeah. Let's watch how many times he pledges his allegiance while he delivers these lines. Speaker 1: Trump's over here. Trump's coming. Trump is coming. Speaker 0: And like he's Santa Claus. Speaker 1: March to the other side. That's where Trump's gonna be. Speaker 0: Ugh. Just ginning up the crowd with empty promises. Per usual question. How many bodyguards does it take to lift the beach well from a stage made of folded chairs? Now let's check-in one last time with Angel Walsh over at the Southwest Channel entrance. Speaker 1: I had to run away because there was a big lab boom, and then there was some green gas. Speaker 0: See all those people in the background? In line, waiting for their turn to go. Have any of y'all ever been a background actor? Yeah. It looks just like this. All actors, not recording. Now these are our filler characters. They're mostly here to chant and take up space. So that's one group. Now another group comes in. You wanna bring them in organically in waves. So if you are an actor and you see a camera on, you're gonna do what this little girl does. You're gonna show off your little sign. Creepy. Oh, you don't think they would employ children? Okay. You've got lot to learn. Okay. We saw your damn sign, kid. They're all just standing there waiting for their turn. Speaker 1: And they just keep on coming. Going up on the lawn. Speaker 0: Notice how they're all coming from the right instead of cutting through where this gap is. Because we wanna make it seem like these people walk from Pennsylvania Avenue, and nobody's gonna get into character until they arrive. That's why they all look so dead inside. Remember how he said earlier the summoning was part of the show? Well, it isn't right here. And look what crack dragged in. It's Mike Cernovich. Speaker 1: Enough. We're going in. Going up on the water. Push forward as far as you can. Speaker 0: Now before we go, let's take a closer look at our line of background actors that extends north from the Garfield monument to the Ulysses s Grant Monument. And remember, the street closest to the Garfield monument, First Street Southwest, and Southwest Drive have been restricted from our public for years. We have all these folks still waiting to go in. These are all paid protesters, people. Look at the line. And that concludes our Southwest analysis with Angel Walsh. We were very grateful to find this footage. We thank you and your husband for capturing it. Back on the East Side. Oh, we've got a little commotion. And what, pray tell, do you think was carried on this truck bed? Notice this cardboard tube for later. And they just pull the barricades down here on the South Terrace while the cops do what they do best, retreat. It's not every day that you see Chinese grandmas contributing to your mass programming. Speaker 6: Wow. What a shit show at the capital. I'm gonna go ahead and guess stop being so gullible wasn't anyone's New Year's resolution for 2021. How the hell do people keep falling for this shit? Here's a video of the kerfuffle that happened between the protesters and the cops when they got past the barricades. Speaker 1: Police are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go. Speaker 6: Squabbling? Maybe they stormed it. Maybe they walked right in. Speaker 0: And that's exactly what they do. From the Northeast to the Southeast Plaza, obstacle one is complete. Push those barricades. See this cop tugging on Kool Aid Man, drops his flag never to retrieve it, just to slow it down, to whisper sweet nothings. While these cops fake retreat, notice this massive stash of water. Yep. As they keep pouring in from all sides. Retreat. Retreat. At the same time, and with impeccable timing, Jonesy and his disciples make their way towards the East. Speaker 1: Fucking cops in the front. Back off, man. Speaker 0: Come on, Jonesy. You know they're k fabe cops. Speaker 1: We just showed up. Trump's taking them. Alright. Let's take them up there. Speaker 0: Locked us up. Speaker 1: Use your voices up there. Speaker 0: Voices? Yeah. Go make us all look like freak shows, Jonesy. At 02:00, C SPAN sets up a live camera in Statuary Hall, which we've added a time code to. Also, on 12/22/2021, the GOOBA Ment will release three hours of the Ark entrance tunnel footage, which also begins at 2PM. And there's the time code. Meanwhile, our actors make their way towards the east steps. Simultaneously, notice this guy placing water bottles around the perimeter. Like it's an Easter egg hunt? And there it is. Yep. Spaced and placed. And here, our East Side actors are met with obstacle two. Meanwhile, things are getting really explosive out by the scaffolding. Watch out, Tay Tay. Speaker 1: Hey. Hey. Fire. Hey. How you feel? This man just got life on fire. Speaker 0: I love the fact that Taylor Hansen delivered these lines holding a lit cigarette. Now as he retreats, a cattle of kayfabe cops arrive, where on the megaphone, they play this message. Speaker 1: What are you doing? Speaker 0: Yeah. What is he doing? You get them shots, Joseph Prezzioso. Hey. Here's one for you. Notice this guy comes from the crowd to take a load off because he's setting up their next shot. Speaker 1: Themselves. Speaker 0: Meanwhile, over on the Northwest Lawn, aka Heart Attack Hillside, notice our stunt guy, homeboy, climbing up. We've got ass cracked for days while we entertain the kitties with another show. But just a little love tap sends him to the ground as our photogs lock and load. Tay Tay, I can see your price tag. So this guy in red, Bossy, is tending to Homeboy while our cops play scene blockers, while Legs and Dilly, just standing there like a couple of butlers. Whoops. Some shady shit going on behind that tree. Notice this oddly placed Rubbermaid container. While Rufio from act one records nothing, they're off using a barricade as a makeshift stretcher. Oh, but not before sending him down for the camera crew to photo rape him. Satisfied, Bossy and his team of cops resume their journey. See this death two type? Yeah. Not us. Yep. Still Taylor's footage. Get those pics. And this footage, news to share, comes from quote photographers Alejandro Alvarez and Ford Fisher. And y'all can see for yourselves the other events they've covered. And now Bicop, looking more like himself, taunts our paid protesters as Sabrina Taverniz follows our stunt guy towards the Northwest backstage area. But listen to what Bossy says to this real person. Speaker 1: Hey, man. Hey. I'm gonna break this fucking phone with no shot. What What happened? Speaker 0: And strangely enough, Adam Grey opens the gates. So Sabrina's got her shots, and she, together with Amanda Andrade Rhodes, climb the Northwest Lawn in search of something juicy. And along the way, we meet our friend, Vincent. Speaker 1: They they they they hit me with bullets. Speaker 0: Oh, bless your heart. Back to Heart Attack Hillside, where Dilly's well on his way to having one. What is happening? Just a little spritz as she traipses away. Well, hop. Watch out. Really puts the k in karma as yellow from act one coming down the runway with some cape charisma. Speaker 1: Whose house is this? Speaker 0: Power's house. Attaboy. Is that how you arrest someone? And now together with our photogs, Michael Negro and Julio Rosas, our do gooders, sergeant Pepper, and fake national guard are gonna move a large portion of our cops and protesters. Hey. Redneck archetype still hanging out. Incoming. Incoming. Watch these two k cops. Thelma and Dom DeLuise, just as clueless as ever. She's like, what do we do now? Out my face. Get out my face. Let's keep going, Thelma. Get out of You better get. And now these heroes form a line to protect our delicate deputies. And there they go. That's a mobile standoff over and around to the very boring North Side entrance where we met Vincent. Speaker 1: I wanna borrow your book. Ulfka. Hey. Bring it up. Speaker 0: K Cobs, taking a k break. And along our journey, we meet Richard Barnett, who's gonna become worldwide famous in just a few hours. Speaker 1: This is our Speaker 0: fault. And now they're gonna hold here for a minute, except for these two. And now they just single file right onto the North entrance, back inside the scaffolding, where we are only seconds from defeating obstacle four. Hey, there's Happy. And in this overused clip, Data's about to make some money. Oh, he's got the hammer. Too bad he doesn't use it. Speaker 1: Here comes. What the hammer? Fly out. Toad slam one on the other. Speaker 0: There they go. While this guy and lieutenant perform a lightsaber battle. And this guy gets power aided. OMG, it's Vincent. What are you doing up here, silly? He just wants to reason with them. And with masterly slide of hand, Vincent pulls the barricade away and slides it down the key swine. Speaker 1: Hey. Speaker 0: And now Jade and Jaden have made it to the top. Hiya. Think of Vincent like the hostage negotiator. And that they will. We're standing up for our country. Oh, Red. You're a country and ours. Go get in our way. And now a lot of our stars will hold here at obstacle five. Now back to the east. Obstacle two is coming to a breaking point. Watch this. Notice this cop pulls his buddy up the stairs like he's John Minkelo. This is the queue for the other cops to follow suit, which they do. And obstacle two complete. And there they go. Yeah. Wave all your k faith friends in. And immediately, some of them will take to k faith positions like this Mason tear gas haven't been brought out yet. Back to the scaffolding where the clock is counting down. Listen to lieutenant. Speaker 1: Officer. Officer, please wait. No one's listening lieutenant. Indian white, Chinese, we're all Americans, man. Speaker 0: Creepy. Oh, red. Getting real friendly with Adam the cop. Another creepster monitor. And at the front of the line here, Speaker 1: just shooting the shit with the cops. Speaker 0: Now listen to this friendly real cop. Speaker 1: I'm get him on water. Okay? Get water? Speaker 0: So thoughtful. They're all coming. Speaker 1: I knew. You you guys you guys will literally get trampled out. We do not want it. Speaker 0: Back outside, Chris Jones fights his way to get to John Farina, where overhead, Chris instructs him as the camera pans to reveal our barricaded off photog corner. Seen any cardboard tubes like this today? But what are they capturing? Simple. This guy here in the red hat. Notice this guy with the fire extinguisher misting the area for dramatic effect. Got it. Photo by Joseph Prezzioso. Complete with our load off friend. As we come around, this cop intentionally lets this guy fake maze him. And Joseph Prezzioso gets the shots. Back up the scaffolding for a domestic dispute. Speaker 1: Oh, that's spicy as shit. Yeah. Do you wanna trade masks? I definitely don't. Didn't you say you take care of me? No. Now we know. Believe in me now? When I say there's shit going down, there's shit going down. Exactly. Don't believe in you. This is insane, though. Speaker 0: Deflecting, Jaden. Speaker 1: I don't believe in you when you say you care about me and will protect me. I'll give you the tools. I'll still love you. Touch you, buddy. I don't love you. Uh-oh. Oh, that's wrong. You don't love me? Uh-oh. I did say I love you. What the heck? But you don't. I do though. You're like yeah. But I'm the person in the film, though. That's pretty emotional. Speaker 0: Exactly. If Speaker 1: anybody needs to sit alive. Speaker 0: It's her. Oh. Speaker 1: Oh. They're going yet? Speaker 0: Whoo. Saved by the bell, Jaden. Look alive, Data. There they go. Hey. There's Doug Jensen. There's a big photoshoot in six minutes, Speaker 1: which we'll see in Speaker 0: act three as bike cop runs alongside them. Here in Data's angle, we can see this conveniently placed slumber. Sneaky sneaky. Back to Jaden, like we're inclining to the top of Capitol Hill's latest roller coaster. Oh, Jesus. Oh, I'm gonna bomb. Look at all those people. Notice this guy carrying a case of water. Hurry up, Jade. This footage ain't gonna record itself. And now we've reached, yeah, you guessed it, obstacle six, where Carl is just not having it. Speaker 1: You're not gonna fall to Constitution. Speaker 0: He's like, bitch, please. Now what am I gonna have for dinner? Back to the East Side where this, what looks to be three toddlers in a trench coat and a photog creep into the scene to shoot Hunter Allen empty. And with just a single kick, remember in act one when we hypothesized that some of the windows have been switched out with Hollywood glass? And a real cop tackles him to the ground. And with the help of his real cop friends, arrest and detain him. But these guys aren't real. And now they're off. They just waddle away. Yeah. I'm talking to you. Speaker 1: Welcome to the guys. Open open our door. Speaker 0: While this real cop removes the remaining glass to let our k friends in. Speaker 1: I feel like this is a fucking trap. Speaker 0: And you would be correct. And now they've let the kid go. Yeah. It gives new meaning to walk of shame. Back to obstacle six, where bi cop and replacement Barbie play with their sticks. Speaker 1: Alright. Carl's over it. Speaker 0: Retreat, you counterfeit cops. My my. Look at this surplus of neatly placed water and this plastic rolling toolbox. Wonder in there. Maybe the fake collection results. As we pan to one of our most important characters, who got the prize winning footage at the stage Rittenhouse shoot, phony protest photographer, Brendan Gutenchwager, who's about to have a payday. Get those purified waters, which is just a fancy way of saying fluoridated water. Oh, fake blood littering. Speaker 1: I can't believe this is reality. Speaker 0: Yeah. Me neither. As Data and friends move from the courtyard to the Northwest door, where some of our crisis actors are looking for some critique. So let's help them out, starting with geesewine. Yeah. Speaker 1: I would've put a little bit more soul into it. Next. Speaker 0: Try the left one. Good job. Honey, that's that's real glass. Don't just stop. And now we pan to Pizzola in the most overused mainstream media clip of the capital riots, filmed by none other than Gutenchwag, who sold his footage to Storyful. They always do. And with that, let's stop our investigation here at 02:12PM. Oh, you're so sweet. Alright, Simadonna. Everything we've learned today will wrap up quite nicely in act three, our final installment on the January 6 fakesurrection. But friends

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

“EVERYBODY TAKE THIS VIRAL NOW PLEASE” @drawandstrike

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@InvestigateJ6 - InvestigateJ6

WATCH: January 6th Protestor POV! 🚨 5 minute short film showing the first moments of the Jan 6 protest in chronological order. Thanks to the work of January 6th investigators, you can now watch how the protest devolved into a riot from the point of view of a protestor walking on to the Capitol grounds! Credit: @InvestigateJ6 @HelpStopHate

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." "01/06/2021, the media propaganda machine fed us a story that shapes the narrative of insurrection." "They intentionally left out some key details." "There's an entire timeline that you haven't seen and it tells a different story." "They're going into the capital, I think." "It looks like they got sniper rifles." "We want to petition our government for the redress of grievances." "Notice the smoke from the sniper's barrel?" "What do you think that means?" "This is where Joshua Black is shot in the face." "He never saw it coming." "The agitator Landon Copeland admitted to being a member of Antifa just after being sentenced for his involvement." "They're trying to save this guy's life right now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol Building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard. Speaker 1: 01/06/2021, the media propaganda machine fed us a story that shapes the narrative of insurrection. They intentionally left out some key details. There's an entire timeline that you haven't seen and it tells a different story. Speaker 2: They're going into the capital, I think. Look, there's cops up there. It looks like they got sniper rifles. Everybody stop here. Where Speaker 1: did Trump say to meet him? Down Speaker 2: front? Who Speaker 1: were the agitators? What was the timing? How did the chaos begin? Speaker 2: Unit six, I need less legal teams. They could come up from the Upper West Terrace and take an elevated position. Right now, we have group are stopped at the Lower West Terrace. They're not compliant, climbing staff late. Let me know when the lesson legal team are in place. We want to petition our government for the redress of grievances. Speaker 1: Did the officers not hear this? You were told there was fighting, but Speaker 2: where Excuse me. No. Fuck you. Fuck you. You're a traitor. Put that gun down. Unit six, I got a crowd fighting with Speaker 1: Were there any warnings to evacuate? Much less safe exit routes. Dig deeper. Do you see it? Let's slow down a little. Notice the smoke from the sniper's barrel? What do you think that means? This is where Joshua Black is shot in the face. He never saw it coming. First blood, but wouldn't be the last. Is this where the agitation began? The police line is now reinforced. Chris Quaglin approaches screaming about the shooting of an innocent protester in the face when an agitator tactically pushes him from behind into the already anxious police. The agitator Landon Copeland admitted to being a member of Antifa just after being sentenced for his involvement. Speaker 2: The police reacted with violence, further infuriating what was a peaceful crowd. The Speaker 1: anger spreads among the crowd from Speaker 2: the unprovoked attack by federal agents. None of this had to happen. As Speaker 1: aggressive police forces continued to provoke the crowd, Speaker 2: peaceful became chaos. Speaker 1: This attack by police ignited the past one thousand days of terror which ends now. Speaker 2: They're trying to save this guy's life right now.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Jan 6 protestors were funneled into ONE area where they were hit, shot at, gassed, and assaulted with flashbang grenades. this was before any breach happened. Really based guy sums things up at the end.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

slowed down video of what capital police did to peaceful protesters after cutting off entrances and corralling/trapping them into ONE area:

@Ledzep2425 - American Patriot

@rsanandin @mikey_sk1dz Assault on Patriots J6/21

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Jan 6 INSURRECTIONISTS caught in action! https://d2hxwnssq7ss7g.cloudfront.net/Cg3gG8trkats_cvt.mp4

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Julie Farnam's running for public office in VA! She was hired by Capitol Police specifically at the recommendation of Yogananda Pittman to be the Trojan Horse to scramble the Intel leading up to J6 so that day could be as bad as possible. TREASONOUS SCUM

@elleonCEOTK - Tarik Johnson

Message to Julie Farnam: Now I know why you blocked me. You didn’t want me to know you were running for public office in Virginia. Please know that my people are everywhere and you can’t block enough of them for me not to find out what you are up to. If you get a job as a grocery store stock clerk working the midnight shift in Bumfuk County, USA. I will find out about it. Most people in the the country have no idea that YOU were hired by the Capitol Police specifically at the recommendation of Yogananda Pittman to be the Trojan Horse to scramble the Intel leading up to J6 so that day could be as bad as possible. You were partly successful but the analysts working under you were incredibly gifted and still able to piece together enough Intel to send your boss (Pittman) 21-TD-159 outlining what was going to occur on the 6th. Unfortunately Pittman decided to sit on that Intel and you both began an aggressive campaign to punish those analysts after they reported you and Pittman to the IG. Julie, to run for any public office in this country is a slap in the face to everyone in the nation. The only thing you should be a candidate for along with Pittman is the needle as treason is an offense punishable by death. I don’t support the death penalty but I’m positive when everything comes out you and Pittman would garner some votes from people that do. Make no mistake about it. What you and Pittman did was treasonous and I will pray that He will have mercy on your souls. God bless. Tarik K Johnson Former Lieutenant US Capitol Police

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Tarik Johnson wrote the previous message to Julie Farnam. He is a former lieutenant w/ the U.S. Capital Police. His goals are J6 justice & to create National UNITY. It is he who if u care about Jan 6, follow @elleonCEOTK

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Tarik Johnson is a former lieutenant w/ the U.S. Capital Police. His goals are J6 justice & to create National UNITY. if u care about Jan 6, follow @elleonCEOTK

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

accurate

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

capital police attacking peaceful protesters on Jan 6:

@Ledzep2425 - American Patriot

@rsanandin @mikey_sk1dz Assault on Patriots J6/21

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Ashli Babbitt murdered 00:40 unarmed & pushed by the crowd, she stood in the window frame and was shot IN THE NECK by trigger happy capital police. she bled out on the capital floor. her MURDERER was cleared of wrongdoing. i want justice for Ashli Babbitt!

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Ashli Babbitt's Family sues the government 4 wrongful death: Michael Byrd didn't warn her b4 he shot her DEAD. He once left his LOADED gun in the Capital bathroom. He shot at teenagers stealing his car hitting the side of houses! 1:26:00 Lawsuit breakdown https://youtu.be/EVf4wgpwHa4

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

INSURRECTIONIST CHAOS INSIDE THE CAPITAL ON JAN 6!

@RyanPatrick1991 - RyanFJBLGB🇺🇸🦅

I cannot believe how violent these extremists were on J6. The Capitol Police barely escaped with their lives.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Epoch Time's The REAL Story of January 6th movie & timeline breakdown thread:

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Learn the Real Story of January 6th. covers: Ashli Babbitt, Roseanne Boyland, Luke Coffee, Matthew Perna, Victoria White, Brian Sicknick, Michael Byrd, Lila Morris, Kash Patel, Donald Trump and MORE. - open thread for timeline breakdown -

@EpochTimes - The Epoch Times

WATCH the FULL MOVIE of "The Real Story of January 6" FREE now on X until Jan 6! Exclusive interviews & footage from 18 months of investigation reveal the truth that has been hidden from Americans. #TheRealStoryofJan6 The truth comes out in this eye-opening documentary!

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

The story of Harry Dunn, a Capital Police officer running for congress, who's not AT ALL who he seems. just watch his campaign video. yes this is REAL.

@docMJP - Matthew J. Peterson

I ask all of you to watch and compare this actual video of Officer Dunn on January 6 (and we have lots more coming) with his delusional campaign ad:

@theblaze - TheBlaze

EXCLUSIVE INVESTIGATION Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn won a Congressional Gold Medal and got a lucrative book deal for his account of events on J6. The story made him a media hero. But a review of video evidence from that day does not corroborate his story. At all. WATCH:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Private first class Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police is described as acting with courage to defend our institutions and our people. Critics say a Capitol Police officer assigned to Pelosi’s detail appears to have given false testimony, with Missus Percher brought in to corroborate another officer’s testimony. It is imperative that we establish the truth of that day. The officer who testified in the Oath Keepers trial was sentenced to eighteen years in prison. Dunn’s book, Standing My Ground, a capital police officer's fight for accountability and good trouble, is described as one of the first accounts from Capitol Police about January 6, and its tour is unique: 'no other, none other of the Capitol Police officers are allowed to tell their stories.' Pelosi says, 'And it's also our duty to establish and preserve the narrative of that day,' while others allege a concerted effort to manipulate information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Private first class Harry Dunn from the United States Capitol Police. Officer Harry Dunn acted with remarkable courage and valor to defend both our institutions and our people. Speaker 1: The Capitol Police officer assigned to the protective detail of then house speaker Nancy Pelosi appears to have given false testimony. Speaker 2: Missus Percher brought in to corroborate the testimony of another Capitol Police officer. Speaker 3: It is imperative that we establish the truth of that day. Speaker 4: The Capitol Police officer who just took the stand in the Oath Keepers trial. Speaker 1: Sentenced to eighteen years Speaker 0: in prison. Generations to come will think of him. Speaker 5: It never happened. The way he unpacks the stories. I don't conflate my story. Sounds like something a useful idiot would say. Speaker 6: Officer Harry Dunn in his new book, Standing My Ground, a capital police officer's fight for accountability and good trouble. Speaker 7: Officer Dunn has been among the first capital police officers to describe what happened to law enforcement on January 6. Speaker 2: It is expected that when somebody does release a book that they're going to do a quote unquote book tour, that they're going to make media appearances. The most unique and interesting thing about this book tour that he's on is that for some reason, no other, none other of the Capitol Police officers are allowed to tell their stories. Speaker 6: What if Donald Trump wins again with his Speaker 5: got anything stronger. Speaker 2: Let's make no mistake about it. There were a lot of officers injured that day. I have reviewed hundreds and hundreds of hours of video, and there was violence. I saw violence there that day with my own eyes. In the dozens of media interviews that he has participated in. Speaker 4: Seen on TV many times. Speaker 2: Has anybody ever showed a single second of video of his heroic actions that Speaker 6: We need heroes What like Speaker 2: we learned from the book though, he goes into great detail about his own history of therapies, counseling sessions. Speaker 5: And I'm now receiving private counseling therapy for the persistent emotional trauma of that day. Speaker 2: Mostly dealing with anger issues. And of course, we did see some of those anger issues displayed. Get the out Speaker 5: of here. Speaker 2: So he was already distressed, already seeing things, imagining things, escalating things in his own mind in a way that other officers weren't. I'm not gonna try and play psychologist because I'm not one. There's just something wrong with him. One of those incidences took place at the top of a stairwell down in the crypt. It's a staircase that leads down to the lower terrace where a lot of officers were receiving first aid for their injuries. He was surrounded by some Metropolitan Police officers when inexplicably, he just lost control. There was nobody doing any violence of any type in that room at the time. In fact, there was only a very, very small handful of protesters in the crypt at that moment, and they were all the way across the room, and he just started screaming and shouting obscenities across the room. And at that moment, captain Ben Smith of the United States Capitol Police ran over to him, put his hand on his shoulder, you know, calm down, Harry. Calm down. Couple minutes later, Harry broke out in a run towards the staircase that led up to what they call the small rotunda or the speaker's lobby. And as he's running towards those stairs, he accidentally hit the button on his magazine from his m four automatic weapon. The magazine bounces off the floor. Three other officers run over. One of them picks it up and hands it to him, and Harry runs to the top of the stairs. He's clearly agitated. He's in a high level of distress, not because he's been fighting with anyone. When he reached the top of that stairs, that was the moment when oath keeper Ken Harrelson saw this highly distressed officer carrying an automatic rifle arrive to the top of the stairs. Already, something's going wrong in his head. There wasn't a single officer carried off on the stretcher that day. There was another scene that took place in which he describes in the book not so terribly accurately. He says that he saw a protester who was leaning against the wall. Another police officer had given this protester a bottle of water to wash out his eyes because the protester had been sprayed with pepper spray. The book says that he was screaming obscenity to that protester and yanks the bottle of water out of his hand and then throws it, in his own words, halfway across the rotunda floor. Harry can be seen entering the rotunda. He's not running, but he does inexplicably walk the full length of the floor. He walks over to this lady sitting on a bench. She's wearing red and complete far end of the capital or the rotunda from where he entered. He's screaming at her And she's doing nothing. And immediately, an officer has to come over and intervene and actually takes the lady away from from officer Dunn. Then Dunn walks over to the middle of the rotunda floor where a protester is sitting in the middle. He's not leaning against the wall. He's sitting on the floor. He has four or five other police officers around him. He does have a full bottle bottle of water in his hand, and inexplicably, Dunn reaches down and snatches violently, snatches the bottle of water out of his hands, but he doesn't throw it across the floor. He just then ambles across to the other end of the rotunda and walks over and places the bottle on the pedestal of a statue. Then a higher ranking officer can be seen talking to another member of what they call the m four unit, points at Dunn, and basically you can see from his hand motions says get him out of here. And that officer immediately goes over to Dunn and immediately waves him, grabs him, and gets him out of there. Once again, he was not in a position where he was de escalating, where he was calm and collected, where he was in control of his own faculties. Officer Dunn, a personal training officer who teaches de escalation tactics and procedures was not following the lessons that he himself taught, those who he was in charge of training. When the the the January 6 committee was first put together, Nancy Pelosi is famously recorded as saying Speaker 3: And it's also our duty to establish and preserve the narrative of that day. Speaker 2: The stories we have coming out are going to show that there was a concerted effort to manipulate information, manipulate evidence, suppress evidence, and create evidence that does not exist in order to reach those goals of establishing the narrative. Speaker 5: He's been put out as a hero. He received some citizens award from Joe Biden. MSNBC has treated him like a god. As opposed to Tarrant Johnson, what he actually did on January 6 that was heroic, but he's been villainized. Speaker 2: I reached out to Harry. I've been very fair in my series about the Capitol Place. I believe that they were set up that day. I told Harry right from the get go that I believe that he was set up as well. My heart goes out to him and I hope that Harry will eventually see way to maybe pop to me a little bit further and a little deeper and give me a little bit more inside information.

@libradunn - Harry Dunn

On January 6th, I defended our democracy from insurrectionists as a Capitol Police Officer. After, President Biden honored me with the Presidential Citizens Medal. Today, I’m running for Congress to stop Trump's MAGA extremists & ensure it never happens again. Join me:

Video Transcript AI Summary
On this day, my role was as a capital police officer. I'm Harry Dunn. I swore an oath to protect our constitution, to protect our democracy. It's what allowed me to protect some members Congress who I knew were bigots. I put country above self. The problem is a lot of them didn't. Some who stood behind us when we protected them went back on the floor of congress and stood behind Trump. They voted to acquit him. And worst of all, they denied the violence and trauma that led to the death of some of my fellow officers. I couldn't stand by and watch. I left the force after more than fifteen years of service. So that today, I can announce I'm running for congress. We can't ever let this happen again. We've got a democracy to protect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On this day, my role was as a capital police officer. I'm Harry Dunn, and that meant putting aside who I am. A father, a Marylander, a Democrat, because I swore an oath to protect our constitution, to protect our democracy. It's what allowed me to protect some members Congress who I knew were bigots, who helped fan the flames that started all of this. I put country above self. The problem is a lot of them didn't. Some of the same people who stood behind us when we protected them went back on the floor of congress and stood behind Trump. They voted to acquit him. And worst of all, they denied the violence and trauma that led to the death of some of my fellow officers. I couldn't stand by and watch. I had another role play. I used my voice to speak out, to get into good trouble. And a few weeks ago, I left the force after more than fifteen years of service. So that today, I can announce I'm running for congress. We can't ever let this happen again. And you've heard it from Trump himself. He is hell bent on finishing what he started this day. I'm stepping into a new role today, but I can't do it alone. I believe every one of us has a role to play in this fight. So join me. We've got a democracy to protect.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@SteveBakerUSA - Steve Baker

In @theblaze's Oct. 4th story about Special Agent Lazarus, we were able to show, in great detail, what he testified to witnessing between @CapitolPolice Officer Harry Dunn (@libradunn) and four Oath Keepers on #Jan6, he simply could not have seen... ⬇️ https://www.theblaze.com/columns/analysis/analysis-did-pelosis-security-chief-perjure-himself-in-oath-keepers-trial

Analysis: Did Pelosi’s security chief perjure himself in Oath Keepers trial? | Blaze Media The Capitol Police officer assigned to the protective detail of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on January 6, 2021, appears to have given false testimony about his whereabouts during a key encounter with members of the Oath Keepers, according to an examination of Capitol closed-circuit TV vi... theblaze.com

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

Tucker's Jan 6 X take: 01:10 Christopher Wray v. Clay Higgins, were "Confidential Human Sources" inside the capital? 05:00 IT'S A TRAP - FBI INFILTRATION 18:00 200+ FBI ASSETS/CHS 25:00 Government w/in Government 29:00 Ashli Babbitt 35:00 Conclusion https://t.co/RgSHEXvLUO

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Ep. 61 This the smartest, best informed account of what actually happened on January 6th. https://t.co/U9yCWRVJSd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three years after January 6, the speaker questions whether federal agencies played a role in staging the events. In a 2022 Homeland Security hearing, Congressman Clay Higgins asked: 'Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6 protesters and dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol prior to the doors being opened?' The FBI director said such claims are 'categorically false.' Higgins says evidence suggests 'deep state actors within the federal government' lured Americans to Washington and 'set the stage for j four, five, and six'—with 'well over 200' FBI assets in the crowd and inside the Capitol who 'led' protesters inside. He argues the objective was to 'destroy the entire mega movement' and to keep Trump out of office. He calls for releasing unredacted 'digital files from j four, five, and six' and cites those who 'cheered the murder of Ashley Babbitt.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been exactly three years since January 6, the events of January 6. The racist insurrection that shocked this nation to its core more profoundly than anything since Pearl Harbor plus the civil war. And it has taken a while, honestly, even for people who aren't on the side of the professional liars to realize there's something amiss about what happened that day, not just the response, the largest law enforcement mobilization in the history of The United States. That was obviously disproportionate because it wasn't the worst riot that year, not even close. But the day itself, there was something about January 6 that didn't feel right, and hovering over that day has remained the question, to what extent was it a setup? And we still don't really know. But what's interesting is how few people have asked that entirely legitimate question. One of the very few, really one of the only in the United States Congress, is a member called Clay Higgins from Louisiana. In case you haven't seen this clip, it's worth rewatching. This is from 2022 in a Homeland Security Committee hearing where he asked it just directly of the FBI director. Watch. Speaker 1: Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6 protesters and on 01/06/2021? Speaker 2: Well, congressman, as I'm sure you can appreciate, I have to be very careful about what I can say about when Speaker 1: Even now, because that's what you told us two years ago. Speaker 2: May I finish? About when we do and do not and where we have and have not used confidential human sources. But to the extent that there's a suggestion, for example, that the FBI's confidential human sources or FBI employees in some way instigated or orchestrated January 6, that's categorically false. Speaker 1: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on January 6 prior to the doors being opened? Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful. Speaker 1: It should be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol. Gentlemen, time has expired. Speaker 2: You should not read anything into my decision not to share information Speaker 1: Director Ray Speaker 2: confidently here. Speaker 1: Gentleman's time has expired. Speaker 0: What a sleazy, repulsive, little authoritarian liar Chris Ray is. That's obvious when you watch that tape. The sad part is so few tapes like that exist because so few have confronted him directly and asked questions to which the entire country has a right to know the answer, like that one. Clay Higgins did that. Congressman from Louisiana Louisiana Lafayette joins us in studio. Congressman, thanks so much for coming on. Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Tuck. Speaker 0: So that was over a year ago that you asked that question, which is a central question, and you asked it as I think is appropriate without any embarrassment at all on behalf of your constituents and the rest of the country. Are you any closer to the answer now? Speaker 1: Well, we're closer to being in a position where we can reveal the answers that we already have. Much of the evidence that we have compiled from investigative effort over the the course of the last couple of years. Some officers like my own sort of operating in silos of investigative endeavor have now been able to come together now that we have a Republican majority and we have access to the to the to the staffs of the appropriate investigative committees. And so I sit on the oversight committee and we Republicans run that committee now, therefore, we control the staff. So when you can magnify the efforts that individual members of congress have have have pushed within our own offices, when you can magnify those efforts by the the skill and the numbers of staff from the committees, you you you get a lot of evidence reviewed professionally and aligned and assembled into essentially a case file. And in in this case, this is a big file because the the the involvement of of certain actors, you could say deep state actors within the federal government to set the stage for what happened in in j four, five, and six and and to entrap thousands of Americans from across the country and to lure them into this this set stage on j four, five, and six. The people that were involved in that is is quite a large web. So, yes, sir. We do have a great deal of evidence compiled, and we're we're gradually, professionally rolling that evidence out. So you sort Speaker 0: of answered the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume law enforcement intel and military, and I'm using your words, lured Americans to Washington into what you called a trap. Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Speaker 0: So that would I mean, that's a shocking and I assume that's Speaker 1: a that's a sober conclusion based on the evidence. That's what you're saying? That's that would be my sober assessment as an investigator. And I'm you know, I'm quite a I love my country, and and I've I've always been a staunch defender of the thin blue line. And I I would proudly count the FBI amongst that number. It's like brothers to me. So to find that level of of conspiratorial corruption at the highest levels of the FBI has been very troubling to me as a man, as a cop. And and yet, you know, you follow the evidence wherever it leads. And Yes. This is what investigators do. So when I asked Christopher Wray that that question, for instance, I already knew the answer. I had reviewed compelling evidence that that FBI had assets, human assets, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol prior to the doors being opened and the masses allowed in. So I I knew that the FBI was deeply involved. I'd seen evidence even at that time with that the FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of Americans who were essentially voicing their their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about COVID oppression. Those Americans were targeted by the FBI, almost universally, Republicans and and, largely Trump supporters, but the FBI worked undercover to infiltrate those conversations and become a significant part of those individual Americans' communications. And when you dig into the evidence that we've we've had revealed through through some criminal cases that I've I've followed and worked with the families of j six political detainees and Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in in the capital that day. And some of that evidence is shockingly reveals that the the the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were were the first ones to plant the seeds of of suggestions of of a of a more radical occupation of the capital. And and they were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would would begin acknowledging that, you know, yeah, may maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the the origins of those conversations, they they were started by the the FBI undercover guy that was operating inside the group. And then months later, on January, many of those Americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where American patriots assembled to object to to everything that had happened during 2020, the COVID oppression, and the the stunning results of what we believe was a compromised election cycle in November 2020. So Americans gathered at their own capital to to appropriately air grievances and protest at their capital, but embedded amongst their number was an FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months. So this was the level of of manipulative effort that the FBI invested into American citizenry and our our assembly online to our and to exercise our rights under the First Amendment to talk to each other about whatever we wanna talk about, including the the the insidious oppressions of COVID that we were suffering across the country. So and our concerns about where the election was going, the whole mail in ballot thing, we can see the stage was being set for a compromised election cycle possibly. And to our horror, that's what happened. So FBI had fingerprints on this thing from for many months prior to j four, five, and '6. Speaker 0: I wanna go back to something you said in the first sentence, which is you have seen evidence, and that spurred your questions to Chris Wray, that there were FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters within the Capitol. So that is proof of entrapment because, of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the Capitol Building. There aren't that many doors. You work there, you know. But they allowed people in on purpose to entrap them. That's what Speaker 1: that proves, think. Does it not? Well, it's certainly condemning. It's another piece of the of the strategy that the that the government employed to sort of complete the entrapment of Americans that they had had infiltrated and then prodded and provoked with online with the with the those original seeds planted of of actions like, you know, what type of gear to wear and and and just in in language that incited behavior that could go the wrong way. You know, pushing actions of of legal and legitimate peaceful protest to an edge where where those Americans would likely not have gone had they not been been, you know, encouraged by the FBI plant amongst their number that they didn't know was there. So by the time it was actually j six and you had you had masses of Americans assembled outside the capital, They're almost, like, 99.9%, 100% peaceful. On the inside, you had FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters that knew their way around the Capitol. Before the doors even opened. Before the doors open. Or else, how are you gonna get around the Capitol? You've been there many times. You need a guide to get from whatever door you go in. It's a labyrinth. It's it's a it's a maze inside there. So you that's right. So there's no way just Americans, most of which had never been to the capital, there's no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to the to the statuary or the house chamber or the Senate Chamber. It's just not possible. So the the the FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to to specifically wave in the the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the Capitol and the doors opened and they were allowed in, and on the inside were were, oh, there's some more Trump supporters, but really those were FBI assets, law enforcement assets that knew their way around the capital. And they they waved those guys in, said, come on. Follow us. And they they are the ones that led them on the path directly. How do you think of guys never been to the capital gonna gonna come into the capital all amped up on on emotion and make his way straight to Nancy Pelosi's office. Come on. It's like I couldn't get it. There's no way. I've been there for seven years. Could come in some random door at the Capitol and make my way to Nancy Pelosi. Unmarked. Speaker 0: I mean, those leadership offices are unmarked. So how would Speaker 1: you know? It's confusing to get around in the Capitol. Every American that has been there knows this. When you go on a tour, you bring your family to DC, you go through the Capitol, you have to have a guide. And and on January 6, the guides were FBI assets, the law enforcement assets, and they were dressed as Trump supporters. They were positioned inside the capital prior to the doors being opened so that the Americans that had assembled outside the capital, once allowed in, could be brought directly to the areas where the FBI and the DOJ and the deep state actors knew would be the most the most sort of condemning criminal action of of Americans being a lot being inside the capital protesting without permit and things. They knew it was setting the stage for arrest and prosecution. It's such Speaker 0: a crime. Who who planned this, do you think? Speaker 1: I think factions planned this. I wouldn't say who, Tucker, because that yeah. I don't think there was one person chart that that planned this, but I believe the the faction of establishment liberals within the the FBI and the Democrat Party and our intelligence services to to another extent used their massive powers of surveillance and and and investigative assets that they have across the country, confidential informants, registered informants, nonregistered informants, voluntary informants. It's an it's a it's a a complex web of of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, doesn't take much. The faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services that would coordinate with with the most extreme liberal factions within a Democrat party that were desperate to keep Trump out of office and and, you know, worked within the the theater of operations, shall we say, that had been that had been set by the COVID alleged medical emergencies nationwide and millions and millions of mail in ballots. There's no daylight between the the compromised election cycle of November 2020 and ultimately what happened on on on j six. So you ask who planned this? This would be the combination of several several of the most extreme liberal anti Trump, anti America first factions that that were in positions of authority within our our federal law enforcement organizations and the the Democrat party across the country. Speaker 0: Can when you say that there were FBI assets in the crowd, it in the building beforehand and and certainly outside, what's the scale of this? Are you talking like ten, twenty? No. Speaker 1: Based upon some very conservative, but, like, hard investigative effort evaluation of of the numbers from putting together eyewitnesses and and videos and and affidavit statement and whistleblower statements and court records that have been revealed through individual criminal cases where j six defendants have been prosecuted and smart attorneys have forced, admissions by the DOJ and the FBI, but those admissions have been sealed within the parameter of that criminal case by protective order by the judge so they I I can't share them, but I've seen them. So real hard objective and conservative estimates would would put the number of FBI assets in the crowd outside and working inside at at well over 200. 200? Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. So you're in law enforcement? Yeah. Yeah. Before you came to congress in the military as well. That seemed that's an extraordinary number. Is it? Well, no. When you think about the scope of the operation, if you were gonna do this, would need you would need that moment. To so like when, I don't know, Minneapolis burned down or when Saint John's, the Episcopal Church of Carceral in the White House in Lafayette Square was set ablaze and all the secret service agents were injured. Were there 200 FBI assets in the crowd among Antifa then? Speaker 1: I mean, I I don't know how many undercover agents FBI would have in a situation like that, but but but but j six was the was the was the final act prior to arrest and prosecution of of Americans that that were identified as as Trump supporters. I mean, the objective was to destroy the entire mega movement, to to forever stain the the patriotic fervor that was associated with with the America First mega movement that had won in 2016 and we believe won again in 2020. And the the establishment, on both sides of both major parties were determined to to smash that out of existence, not just by defeating Trump, but by destroying the the reputations of the movement itself, by creating this narrative that that was totally false, but but was heavily pushed that the that mega Republicans, American First Republicans are somehow a danger to our republic and a a domestic terror threat. There's a whole another story about what the FBI has done to tagging Americans as suspected domestic terrorists and and following us as we travel across the country. But the the bottom line is that 200 as a I I believe is a conservative number. Personally, I think there were there were many more. But a number that I'm comfortable going on record with is that we believe that there were that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the capital, embedded into groups that entered the capital or provoked entry of the capital and working with FBI assets that would have included metro police and capital police that would dress as Trump supporters inside the capital because those were the guys that knew their way around the cap. So given the scope of the operation and the number of of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged, than the and the number of people that were actually outside the capital and it entered, we believe 200 is a conservative number. Yes, sir. Speaker 0: It's it's shocking what you're saying. It confirms everyone's worst suspicions about this. It's clearly true. Did you come across any evidence that the the DOD, the military, either Defense Intelligence Agency or National Guard or any part of the US military played any role in this at all? Speaker 1: I have not seen that. I've heard the echoes of that suspicion, and I have I have observed circumstantial evidence that that has been presented to me that I've that I have reviewed. But to but to me, it does not rise to the level that I would call actionable from an investigative perspective. So there's some there was some some suspicion, but in in in law enforcement, the thresholds you're looking across is reasonable suspicion that would prompt a a criminal investigation. And then the next threshold is probable cause, which you need for arrest. And then, of course, in our system, finally, the last threshold is is, is conviction and guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. So then I I did review evidence, Tucker, regarding some suspicions of military involvement in some way. But and I and I've I have reviewed some of that evidence that that has been that I've been able to get my hands on. And I do not think that the the military was was involved, not at the level, most certainly not at the level of the of the FBI and, over the course of all of 2020. And then on j four, five, and six, the FBI working in coordination with other law enforcement assets that that they roped into the operation Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 1: From Metro PD, from DC, and and the Capitol Police was sort of Speaker 0: sort of tricked into participating with the with what the FBI had been staging for, you know, ten months. It just I mean, if you take three steps back, this is not democracy. So the federal agencies serve under the oversight of the elected president and then on under the oversight of the elected congress. Their elected people get to make the decisions. You have a republican president, you now have a republican congress, and neither one can get a straight answer from the FBI. No one has any control of the FBI. You're describing a government within a government. Speaker 1: Well, in America, a question becomes reasonable men would would would ask when we face a crisis like this, who investigates the investigators? Right. And the answer in America is is congress. So we we have the responsibility to investigate through the appropriate committees, which would we're certainly we're certainly doing that now that we have a Republican majority in control of the committees, but we don't have the power to arrest. We can we can give criminal referrals based upon our investigative efforts, but we have to have a DOJ that's receptive to the criminal referrals. So we we've hit quite a a brick wall, have we not? Constitutionally, we we have the responsibility to investigate objectively, and and and anyone that knows me know that's exactly what I'm I'm pursuing. I do not have I'm not trying to create a crime to fit a narrative to blame on the FBI. I'm following the evidence, and and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level and a and a a conspiracy within our government at the highest level to create the the to set the stage for a compromised election cycle in 2020, and then the the the actions that took place on j four, five, and and six, and then the the criminal investigation, arrest, and prosecution of Americans that they were able to entrap and document with the thousands of cameras that were operating that day and use that evidence that they knew they were setting up to investigate, arrest, and prosecute the Americans that they had entrapped. So congress can investigate these things, and we and we are, and we will reveal these horrific truths, and we will have criminal referrals. But until you have a a a a president running the executive branch that will clean house at the DOJ and FBI at the highest levels and put American patriots in place that will be that will act upon the criminal referrals that that congress provides, then none of those guys are gonna get arrested because they're not gonna arrest themselves, and we don't have arrest authority. Speaker 0: I'm a little and don't expect you to be critical of your colleagues in the Republican conference, but I mean, they do control the house. Impeachment is a thing. Chris Wray is still the FBI director. I watched Republicans, some of whom I know, cheer the murder of Ashley Babbitt, was an unarmed woman, less than five five, by Michael Bird. They were Michael Bird's side. And it I have to say for a lot of Republican voters, I count myself among them, very clarifying. If you're cheering Ashley Babbitt's murder shooting women now, that's okay because she likes Trump? And the Republicans were like, yeah. Was happy. Like, lot of them thought that. What the hell? Speaker 1: Yeah. That was and it it made me sick. Me too. You know, I'm there's a a great responsibility when you when you wear a badge in America. I mean, think about it. To be to be the to be the designated servant of your community that has that has the the authority to to deny the freedom of a fellow American in the land of the free. Like, that's a heavy responsibility. So the the escalation of of force is must be appropriate in order to affect a lawful arrest. And and a a bad a bad shoot is the worst thing that an officer can possibly be involved in in his in his career. It's it's, you know, we it's it's it's the thing of nightmares for for good police officers. So to take what was would from a law enforcement perspective was clearly a bad shoot because there's some basic rules you just cannot violate. You have to attempt to effect an arrest before you can go to deadly force. There was there was no attempt to arrest Ashley Babbitt. There were there were officers on the other side of the window she was climbing through. There were officers on the interior side of the window she was climbing through. There was no indication they had been they'd this had been going on for an hour, and there was there was no reports on the radio anywhere else of of gunfights. So there was no reason at that point to expect that Ashley Babbitt or anybody else in the in the crowd was gonna produce a firearm and start firing on police officers. Why? Because it had not happened. So that's part of the totality of circumstance that a police officer is responsible for knowing. We stay in constant communication with our radios. We know what's going on. That officer that that that pulled that trigger would shot a a American woman who was clearly in a in, like, a physically compromised position climbing through the broken glass of a of a window is not you know, it's not like she just stepped into the cage at MMA, and she was ready to fight. She's climbing through a window draped in a flag. There's police officers on the other side of the window. There's police officers on the interior side of the window. So you have plenty enough officer presence. If you wanna arrest that woman, then by all means, pull her through the window, you know, put flex cuffs on her and throw her in the corner. We'll get to you later, ma'am. We're kinda busy right now. That's what you do. You'd grab that woman and pull her through, flex cuffed her and threw her in the corner, or handed her back to somebody that could pull her back, you know, from that front line right there. So I understand that very well understand officers have to make split second decisions, but you never you never make a decision to use lethal force unless it's absolutely called for and required if you're losing a fight attempting to effect an arrest, then then, yeah, you know, if the if if there's if if the officer's life is in danger and is all by himself, but there's never should be a circumstance where you just pull the trigger on a woman climbing through a window that's clearly unarmed. There's no evidence of gunplay from the crowd that she's coming from. You got officers on both side of where she is. If you gotta arrest her, then by all means, arrest her. You know, to put flex cuffs on her and and move on. So, you know, she'd nail the next person trying to come through the window, but she don't shoot her. So that was bad Speaker 0: there's an invest a real investigation. Cheered. Yep. Why do you Speaker 1: think that was? And there's this in there's this insanity that has taken hold in the in the the minds and hearts of many otherwise reasonable American citizens where they did they they hate Trump so much. Like, they're they're so deeply embedded and they're they've sold their souls to the establishment that when we had an America first president and and he and he'd, like, stopped the, the military industrial complex forward momentum, and and he and he began restoring power to individual members of congress and restoring individual rights and freedoms and sovereignty of the state. And he took away the actions of the cartels and and and brought this, this real common sense approach to the executive branch and was leading our country in that beautiful direction. This was interfering with the business model of the establishment. So many career politicians on both sides of the aisle, and I, you know, I don't like those guys, man. I'm not one of them. And I I serve my country in congress, but I I don't consider myself a politician by any means. I'm a servant to we, the people. Some of these guys, man, they pop out of the womb to be to be politicians. They get groomed their whole life, you know, to be a a career politician. And those are the ones that had this instinctive cheer for something really bad happening to a Trump supporter. You know, they their true color showed in that moment and was an ugly color. Yeah. That's it. We shouldn't be shooting women, number one. I couldn't agree more. Speaker 0: So where where does this go from here? You have this corpus of information. It sounds like definitive. When does the public see the detail, and what's the process after that? Speaker 1: It's a good question. So evidence from criminal investigations by nature was rather secretive. But there is a, a tremendous compilation of data that I think should be made completely available to the public, and that's the digital files from from j four, five, and six. This is where speaker Mike Johnson can be a champion for for that will be remembered for throughout history as the speaker of the house that fully released unredacted digital files from j four, five, and six completely to the American people. And they within that data, then is full truth. And and the American people, it is the only staff large enough to, you know, frame by frame, go through eighty thousand hours of digital evidence. Nobody has a staff big enough to do that, but we can crowdsource it to the American people. So you ask when will this evidence be released? I'd I've I've been encouraging speaker Johnson as I did speaker McCarthy to, by god, man, release this data to the American people. Speaker 0: Why won't why won't they? Speaker 1: I believe speaker Johnson will, but but Mike is a is is quite a skilled constitutionalist attorney himself, and he's a very measured, patient, faithful man. So I I have I extend trust to to speaker Johnson when he says that it's his intention to fully release the the called the j six tapes, but, really, it's digital evidence is more than it's more than just video evidence. It's it's a lot. It's, you know, radio transcripts, the whole thing. I believe my speaker Johnson knows that this is a significant duty that he must he he he must perform for the American people. It's a moment in history where where, you know, I believe our lord and savior has placed him in that in that position of service to the country, and he has a responsibility to to fully release that data. And then the American people will see for themselves what some of us have already learned to our horror to be true. Congressman Higgins, thank you very much. Speaker 0: Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not permit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

i tried to explain how the judge wouldn't allow evidence of Jan 6 Confidential Human Sources to be presented to the jury. as usual, i was met w/ resistance from a "true believer"🙄 this podcast has the transcript proof. open thread for timeline breakdown. https://youtu.be/hKYB77EPYms

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

https://t.co/f2jFowDcgI

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@Courts_Gaming @WizardLevel @ElliottWaveTech @EpochTimes @VivekGRamaswamy 08:00 defense files motion to dismiss due to Brady violations "Defendents are now aware of 50+ informants but the government is withholding the evidence." prosecution slow to disclose info about CHS involving Proud Boys - including some that were the PRESIDENTS of their chapters! https://t.co/iEr0qcNEyq

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

https://t.co/vAWuuEbCkU

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@Courts_Gaming @WizardLevel @ElliottWaveTech @EpochTimes @VivekGRamaswamy 11:00 FBI Informants & CHS vastly outnumbered by informants, CHS and plain clothes operators representing OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. including Homeland Security Investigations (HSI). this information came to light thanks to William Pope, who found the bodycam videos.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

https://t.co/vKB8Mfuo9N

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

@Courts_Gaming @WizardLevel @ElliottWaveTech @EpochTimes @VivekGRamaswamy 15:00 the MPD document that was previously provided to defendants in discovery indicated the 12 MPD officers listed were the "total manpower". what about all the others? why weren't they listed? who are they and why didn't the prosecution share this information? lies by omission

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

18:00 Summary Report of Activity for Electronic Surveillance Unit: December 12th-Jan 6th. Sgt. Tyrone Harris Sgt Jacob Lipscomb Kenneth Boone Anthony Faverio Keith Green John Streets Roy Melvin Ryan Roe Ricardo Leiva Oliver Lake Amir Abdalla Albert Sabir WHERE are the rest?

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

19:00 UNDERCOVER Officer Tomasula wasn't added to the list given to defense attorneys. WHY NOT? according to Tomasula, he was "not assigned in the same way". whatever the f*ck that means. do u see how they play games? the government twists the law to fit their narrative.

@redpilledkitty - 🍊Vermont Red Pill 💊

20:00 Tomasula answers a 10-33 code by Officer Glover: go 2 Trump's speech & "blend in with the crowd." Code 10-33 means "Emergency All Units Stand By". there were 10-12 other people from Tomasula's (previously not-disclosed) unit there. Michael Callahan & Scott Brown among them

Saved - November 18, 2023 at 4:02 AM

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

🔥🚨BREAKING: The recent release of the J6 videos by Speaker Johnson appears to be proving the insurrection was an inside job. In this video alone we can see that Capitol police release a ‘protester’ and allowed him to keep his gear after he got out of view. https://t.co/p78iVQ8bLE

Saved - November 18, 2023 at 2:20 PM

@meantweeting1 - Epstein's Sheet. 🧻

It was ANTIFA & Feds that did the violence that day. They also did the initial breaches of security with Ray Epps and John Sullivan. Afterwards, the Capitol Police would welcome unknowing protesters inside the Capitol to SET THEM UP for prosecution. That's the basics of J6 https://t.co/IXqG2mgK1D

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses concern about the situation at the capital, stating that they did not come for violence. They observe that the people causing trouble do not resemble patriots or themselves. Speaker 0 warns that families will be targeted and urges everyone to leave, emphasizing that the capital is their family's home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are trying to burn down our capital, and I did not come here for that shit. It ain't patriots up there anymore. If you don't look, they look like Antifa. They don't look like me. They don't look like you guys. It is it is time. They are going to be hunting the families down trying to go home now. They got us here after dark. I see a lot of women. I see a lot of kids. This is your family's home. Yeah. Get out of here.
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 5:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
FBI agents who had infiltrated the group leading up to the Capitol occupation on January 6th were found to be behind suggestions of violence. Tracking text threads revealed their involvement.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

More: “And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you’ll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group."

Saved - December 1, 2023 at 5:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The January 6th incident involved over 200 undercover operatives and Feds, according to Rep. Clay Higgins. Evidence suggests FBI agents infiltrated the crowd dressed as Trump supporters. The FBI's involvement extended beyond that day, with messages leading back to their agents. The event appears to have been a setup, planned months in advance. Despite warnings, law enforcement was unprepared. Claims of a coordinated plot to overturn the election are baseless. This narrative has led to a partisan trial, interfering with the election process. January 6th was a manufactured riot to frame the president and interfere in future elections. Case closed.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

So, it turns out there were "at least 200" Feds and undercover operatives working the Trump entrapment plot on January 6. That's according to U.S. Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), who sat down for a recent interview on the matter. “The FBI was not just participating in the January 6th acts from within. I suspect they had over 200 agents embedded in the crowd, including agents or, as they would call it, human assets inside the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters before the doors were opened.” This figure is in the realm of possibility, given the newly released J6 videos, court documents, and witness statements. “And when you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and find the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6th, you’ll find that those messages were led by members of the groups that ended up to be the FBI agents that had infiltrated the group,” Higgins said. “So the FBI’s involvement was deep, not just on J6, but on the days and weeks and months prior.” There is now zero doubt that J6 was a set-up. The Trump "incitement" narrative had been hatched months prior, as the infamous Time "shadow cabal" article made clear. The J6 riot was war-gamed multiple times before the Electoral College. The FBI unconstitutionally used NSA surveillance to track the extremist groups seeking to disrupt the event. It had Federal informants embedded in multiple extremist groups, including the Proud Boys. Yet, somehow, the FBI and Capitol Police were woefully "unprepared" despite multiple advance warnings, including from then Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund. D.C. Mayor Bowser, former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and others, refused to press for more National Guard, despite it being documented and on the record that former President Donald Trump wanted 10,000 National Guard troops outside Congress to protect the Electoral College. Also, there was no 'centrally coordinated' plot to overturn the results of the 2020 election, as FBI sources told Reuters in an August 2021 report. Indeed, that was the entire point of the election challenges during the convening of the Electoral College. If Donald Trump wanted to overturn the 2020 election results, he would not have disrupted the Electoral College. He would have continued to pursue his legal challenges and his Constitutional right to challenge electoral slates in Congress. Trump would not have sent in unarmed extremists to disrupt the Electoral College in order to 'retain power.' This is not only illogical, it is absurd on its face. Nonetheless, this ridiculous partisan narrative has constituted the basis for prosecuting a former president in what has devolved into a partisan show trial and tantamount to election interference. It is not only ironic, but a disgrace to our entire justice system. January 6 was a Fed-manufactured riot to frame a sitting president and carry out election interference in 2024. Case closed.

Saved - November 12, 2025 at 1:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread arguing Jan 6 was a setup by elites to derail Trump, citing claimed insider texts, undercover agents, staged protests, and pre-made statements. It alleges GOP/Dem collusion, political prisoners, misinformation, and calls for releasing full tapes. The posts frame the event as a coordinated coup and demand accountability for those responsible.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@rayeppswasafed - Truly American

Does anyone else remember when Michael Stenger (Senate Master at Arms on J6), basically said there were "Professional Agitators" there? He was found dead after this statement and prior to his in person testimony with J6 committee, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Runningtowardh1 - Runningtowardhappiness

Note that Michael Senger, in charge of security on J6, talked about "professional agitators" in a prepared statement before he mysteriously died. J6 was meant to derail what T was trying to do, to persuade lawmakers with overwhelming support of patriots. #2000Mules #PeoplePower

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RealTina40 - Tina40

This is DC by Freedom Plaza ... they say it’s for construction work but it’s left out over night ! 🤔🤔 be aware patriots.. watch your 6

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP AOC wasn't smart enough to realize what she'd exposed.

@AOC - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rep. Loudermilk released this statement yesterday: “I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021.” This morning, this footage was released. Dated January 5th, 2021.

@RepLoudermilk - Rep. Barry Loudermilk

🚨BREAKING🚨: The truth will always prevail. As I’ve said since the Jan. 6 Committee made their baseless accusation about me to the media, I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021…

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP Oopsie.

@BoLoudon - Bo Loudon

On January 6, 2021, NPR accidentally released an article at 9:33 AM about Trump supporters clashing with police... HOURS before anything like this ever occurred. Set up.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@laralogan - Lara Logan

It is so obvious what is going on here - the Republicans want to get rid of Trump but they don’t want their fingerprints on it so the Dems are doing it for them. They all know if Trump gets on the ballot it’s over. Same with the impeachment of Biden - the Dems want to get rid of him but they don’t want any of the blame so the Republicans are doing that for them. This is the elite establishment in action. They hate “wethepeople” & have no intention of allowing the constitution or the Republic to survive in anything but name only. Would not be surprised if more Dem controlled states follow suit - then the Republicans can say Trump cannot be the nominee because he can’t win if he is off the ballot in these states. Not their fault of course….Trump’s fault as usual!

@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen

THE PEOPLE ARE WITH DONALD J. TRUMP. His removal from the Colorado primary ballot is an ATTACK on our democracy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that political opponents are acting with extreme desperation and pursuing aggressive measures to win the election. Specifically, the speaker states that “crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary,” implying a willingness to employ drastic, even illicit, tactics to achieve victory. The claim continues that these opponents “are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election,” portraying a view that constitutional and legal norms are being broken in pursuit of electoral success. Further, the speaker characterizes Joe Biden as a direct danger to the democratic system, declaring that “Joe Biden is a threat to democracy.” The repetition emphasizes the perceived severity of the threat, with the speaker reiterating that “It’s a threat,” underscoring the seriousness attributed to Biden’s impact on democratic processes. Another central claim concerns the alleged use of state power to influence the election. The speaker contends that “they’re weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference,” suggesting that law enforcement agencies are being directed or used in ways that would undermine fair electoral processes. This accusation is tied to the assertion of electoral advantage, as the speaker claims that such actions are taking place “because we’re beating them so badly in the polls,” attributing the alleged use of force or influence to the current advantage in polling. Overall, the speaker outlines a narrative in which political adversaries are depicted as acting with unprecedented aggression toward securing electoral outcomes, including constitutional violations and the deployment of law enforcement in ways that would interfere with the election. The emphasis is on a perceived threat to democracy and on the strategic use of governmental power as a tool in contested political competition, framed by the assertion of a significant polling lead that allegedly prompts these aggressive tactics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's no wonder crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary. Are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election. Joe Biden is a threat to democracy. It's a threat. They're weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference because we're beating them so badly in the polls.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Sheckyi - Andrew C ™️

👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻 ARE YOU LISTENING?? Former Capitol Police Chief testifies Pelosi lied about her communication with him & made him the scapegoat for J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Pelosi claimed on national television that she had not spoken to the individual since the initial breach of the Capitol and that there had been no communications with him that evening. The individual, referred to as Speaker 1, confirmed that he spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that evening, contradicting her statement. First call (approximately 05:34 PM): The individual went to brief Vice President Pence at a secure location and to conduct a personal assessment of the Capitol, with House Sergeant at Arms Irving informed that he was going over to brief the Vice President. Irving wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. The first call to Speaker Pelosi occurred during this briefing, establishing direct contact while the briefing was underway. Second call (during departure from the initial location): As the individual left the area and was walking toward the Senate with Mr. Stenger, Jennifer Hemingway handed him Emily Barrett’s cell phone, and it was Speaker Pelosi on the line. This second call concerned the information provided to Vice President Pence about when the Capitol could be returned to the chambers, and the individual reassured Pelosi that the information was correct and that they could get back into the chambers by 7:00 PM. The call ended after this confirmation. Third call (06:25 PM): While at the Senate, away from the initial secure location, using Robert Karam’s cell phone, the individual dialed leadership who were off-site at a secure location to brief them. He briefed all of the leadership on the plans to get them back into the chambers, which constituted the third call with Speaker Pelosi. In summary, Speaker 1 asserts that there were three separate conversations with Speaker Pelosi on January 7, each addressing the situation and the plan to restore operations in the chambers, including confirmation of the timeline to return by 7:00 PM. He states that Pelosi’s claim of not speaking with him is inaccurate, affirming that he did indeed have three conversations with her that evening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A second set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol. But according to your transcribed interview, you were on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Can you explain that discrepancy? Speaker 1: Yeah. That is correct. I spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that that evening, and she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her, but I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the first time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location, I had called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president. Was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34, where I first briefed speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call second call with speaker Pelosi questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven seven p. M, and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 06:25 p. M. I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered. And on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership, who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have call number three with speaker Pelosi. Speaker 0: So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. Speaker 1: That is correct, sir.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

Many have missed what really happened on J6 - swept up in the 'action' staged outside by the 'protestors.' The entire thing was staged to allow RINOs (and anyone else interested) the occasion to abdicate their duties and bypass their obligation to contest the clearly stolen election. Lauffler, Cruz, , Hawley, Paul, and more had sworn they would help Trump and contest - and they are ALL frauds. They KNEW in advance of the Feds plan to stage J6 - as this was what it was all for - to give them the opportunity 'to walk away.' We KNOW for a fact that several Congress people exposed that they ALL knew of the event prior - as a few were busted sending out J6 'response statements' which were posted TO the internet - some to Twitter - PRIOR TO the event even taking place. Not one of these people came back afterward - or even later - and said, 'Hey, we were in the middle of an official, Constitutional proceeding. It was interrupted, but I wasn't finished contesting.' The reason they DIDN'T ever say that?? Because they never really wanted to back Trump in the first place. They LIED. They knew of the plan prior, and they walked away. ALL part of the COUP.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🇺🇸 J6 FLASHBACK On Jan 05, 2021, Chuck Grassley announced that Pence would not be attending the election certification on 1/06/21 and that he (Grassley) would preside. A very ODD statement and Grassley has never FULLY answered for it. 👉🏼 COUP https://www.businessinsider.com/grassley-prompts-confusion-over-pence-electoral-college-certification-2021-1

GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley briefly confuses everyone over announcement on Pence and Electoral College certification GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested that Vice President Mike Pence would skip the Electoral College certification before backtracking. businessinsider.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Since Mike Pence is making J6 the centerpiece of his campaign, I thought I would compare his book to the J6 committee testimony of his 2 top aides. And guess what? They don't jive. Pence said Marc Short and Greg Jacob showed up 2 hours later than they actually did. Pence made it sound like he singlehandedly wrote his statement rejecting the "Eastman Plan" when he didn't. He said he forgot to save the document on his desktop computer so his daughter had to rewrite a printed version for him. (Short and Jacob never mention this) He also omitted a 9:15 a.m. call from Trump that morning, when he apparently didn't tell the president he was working on a public statement for release. Then he said he traveled to the Capitol with his family--but Marc Short said they were in a different vehicle. Weird. https://www.declassified.live/p/mike-pences-rewriting-of-his-january

Mike Pence's Rewriting of His January 6 Heroism As he makes his actions on January 6 the centerpiece of his campaign, Pence appears to have a different recollection than those of his top aides. declassified.live

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

@StevieW64261083 @GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump Renew your mind. Here's a starter pkg. #J6 #January6th #politicalprisoners

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

FLASHBACK: Video never seen or used by J6 COMMITTEE re-emerges of Jacob Chansley reading Trump’s tweet, telling protestors to GO HOME and remain peaceful.. CORPORATE MEDIA DEAD SILENT..

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Easiest way to tell that FOIA claims of Nancy Pelosi was on the phone at least a dozen times with Ray Epps on J6 is true, is when the media disputes it 💯%

@DesireeAmerica4 - Desiree

Everything about J6 was a hoax, check out the onion in her towel right at the beginning. 🙄

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ma'am, what what happened to you? Speaker 1: I got maced. Speaker 0: You got maced. My my place. And what happened? You were trying to go inside the cafe? I made it like a foot inside, Speaker 1: and they pushed me out, and they maced me. Speaker 0: What's your what's your name? Where are from? Speaker 1: My name is Elizabeth. I'm from Knoxville, Tennessee. Speaker 0: And why did you wanna go in? We're storming the Capitol. It's a revolution. Thank you.

@PizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe 🇺🇸

Another unreleased video from J6. Capitol Police cuff a protestor, then bring him to a side room where they uncuffed him, and fist bumped him.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Notice how the FBI removed barricades, which the DOJ now says were a magic Secret Service perimeter that more than a thousand Americans have been criminally charged with crossing.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

At 2:30 p.m. - more than an hour and a half after Ray Epps ran through at the Peace Circle - FBI Swat (supposedly stationed and ready just minutes away) finally pulled into the Capitol.

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

Just released video shows FBI removing barricades on J6. Over 1,000 protestors were charged with knocking down and crossing this perimeter even though Feds had removed it. J6 was a lie just like everything else the Democrats do. Free the defendants.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that Jack Smith’s request to prevent evidence about security or intelligence failures before January 6 is unacceptable, claiming it would excuse Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC for failures. He asserts Pelosi was responsible for January 6 because she did not accept the security help offered, stating that 10,000 troops or National Guard were available if needed before the event, and that the event would have been different if 500 or 200 people had been used; he emphasizes that he offered 10,000 troops and that January 6 would not have happened with a larger deployment. He notes that he personally attended and gave a speech, and claims the audience included the largest number he has spoken to, contrasting with the smaller group that he says went down to the Capitol. Speaker 1 contends that the party should be allowed to introduce evidence showing that there were security and intelligence shortcomings, including the assertion that Pelosi “did not take the security that we offered her,” with the offer of 10,000 troops and the fact that “you had far fewer people than that.” He mentions that the unselect committee did not discuss or include references to “peacefully and patriotically” behaving crowds and says this group was not highlighted by the committee or in their words. He criticizes the prosecutor, calling Jack Smith a “deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out,” and accuses Smith of wanting to suppress testimony because the committee “illegally destroyed everything” and deleted evidence related to Pelosi’s decisions about troop deployment. He asserts that much evidence indicated Pelosi did not want the troops and that a letter from the mayor contradicted Pelosi’s stance. Speaker 0 acknowledges the point but keeps the dialogue focused; Speaker 0 reminds that Capitol Police Chief Steve Sun said January 6 was a preventable event if the intelligence and resources requested had been provided, noting that Speaker 0 sees this as an amazing point and confirms that the offer of troops was in writing. Speaker 1 reiterates that he offered 10,000 troops for January 6 and emphasizes that this fact is in writing, arguing that the prosecution is attempting to suppress relevant evidence. He maintains that Pelosi’s leadership and decisions about security are central to the discussion, and he reiterates the claim that the offer of security was not acted upon. The conversation pivots back to the assertion that the Capitol Police Chief’s past statements support the claim that January 6 was preventable with proper intelligence and resources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jack Smith says he doesn't want you to be able to introduce evidence in your defense that maybe the January was preventable, that police and others had, engaged in some security failures, intelligence failures beforehand. Your reaction real quickly to the prosecutor's request today. Speaker 1: No. Can you believe this? He's tried to defend Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC, but he tried to defend Nancy Pelosi who did not do the job. We offered them, as you know, 10,000 troops or national guard, whatever they wanted before the event, because I knew it was gonna be a very big event. And I it wasn't my event. I went and showed up and made a speech. We offered 10,000 people and more if necessary. And if they use 500 people, if they use 200 people, January 6 wouldn't have been January 6. So they can you imagine? This guy says, we don't wanna introduce that. Well, that's a very big part of it. She was responsible for January 6 because she didn't take the security that we offered her. We offered her 10,000 troops And, you know, you had far fewer people than that. It was a very small group of people relatively compared to the people listening to the speech was which was, by the way, the largest number of people that I've ever spoken before. Nobody ever talks about that, John. They talk about the group that went down and peacefully and patriotically, as I said, as you know, they don't mention that either. You know, that wasn't even brought up in the unselect committee. They didn't even use those words. They didn't say that I said the words peacefully and patriotically. This is a very dishonest group of people. And the deranged prosecutor, Jack Smith, he's a deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out. And you look at this guy, he doesn't want me to say that they turned down and they turned it down in writing, by the way. And what happened is, as you know, the unselect committee deleted and threw out everything. They threw everything out, which would be illegal. If you ever did that in a court, a regular court as a civilian, could you imagine somebody on the right, a republican or something somebody doing as you know, they deleted and threw out all everything having to do with the hearings because a lot of bad things were said about Nancy Pelosi. A lot of bad things were said about a lot of people that they didn't wanna get out to the public. So they threw out everything. They deleted everything. There is no information. There's nothing left. It's like crazy. And the reason he doesn't wanna do that is because they illegally destroyed everything. They destroyed all evidence. So he wants to do this because of the fact that they destroyed all evidence. They don't have the evidence anymore. And a lot of that evidence was pinpointing that Nancy Pelosi didn't take the troops days in advance. Said it. And I said it loud and clear. And they know I said it because I believe it was the mayor wrote a letter back that she doesn't want the troops. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know. It's exciting. Speaker 1: It's Yeah. But can you imagine a man saying, we're not allowed to bring the fact up that I offered 10,000 troops for January 6? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: He's you know, look. He's got a bad record. He's lost a lot of cases, and he loses them because he goes too far. He's a sick puppy. Speaker 0: Well, it's important to note the Capitol Police Chief, the former chief Steve Sun, said on this show that January 6 was a preventable event. Had they gotten the intelligence and the resources that he had asked, you offered them. It just didn't happen. It's just an amazing thing. Sir, I wanna turn to Speaker 1: I offered them. It's true. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. There's no doubt. It's in writing.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism – by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism - by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor           Guest post by January 6 political prisoner Isaac A. thegatewaypundit.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Source of full video https://rumble.com/v2fkvuq-undercover-mpd-footage-from-jan-6..html

undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. https://t.me/StopHateChat/20086 rumble.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨BREAKING: Cell phone video of DC officer on J6 saying “we go undercover as Antifa in the crowd” They’re ADMITTING it How many cops & federal agents were undercover that day? How many instigated violence & property destruction? Release the J6 tapes!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@catmurphy209 - Americat 🇺🇸

It has been three years since the murder of Ashli Babbitt. Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt. "Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead." https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-judicial-watch-launches-lawsuit-against-us-government-for-wrongful-death-of-ashli-babbitt

BREAKING: Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt “Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead.” thepostmillennial.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#ReleaseJ6PoliticalPrisoners! @gatewaypundit Article...

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Everyone can see, if you’re looking…

@RealFletch17 - Fletch17

Wow! Good clip of the signs and warnings they give to their puppets. Hey @LeaderMcConnell looks like you saw a ghost…….

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Pro__Trading - Pro America Politics

JUST IN: President Trump says the FBI was "leading the charge" on J6. Cue liberal meltdown...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that there were many of them, noting that there was Antifa and there was FBI, along with a lot of other people there, all leading the charge. “You saw the same people that I did.” The passage ends with, “But just as…”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And those people have to be many of them. I guess there's some. By the way, there was Antifa and there was FBI. There were a lot of other people there too leading the charge leading the charge. You saw the same people that I did. But just as

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP #RayEpps was a Fed

@bamajayt - Bama_Jeans

@DarrenJBeattie about Ray EPPS compared to other Jan 6 protesters I can feel the anger swelling in me again...😡

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

FEDS AND INFORMANTS EVERYWHERE ON J6 "This is much worse than you can imagine" FBI had agents everywhere on January 6th. The FEDS lost count of how many paid informants there were and had to do an audit to find out. Credit: @TheRedactedInc

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THERE IS NO BASIS FOR ARRESTING THE J6 PRISONERS. J6 was a setup. The police allowed protestors to enter. They need to be released immediately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The material comes from the United States Department of Justice and shows surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33 PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the Capitol undeterred. At 02:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enters through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undeterred. At 02:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36:54, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44 PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. At 02:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the capital through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 02:35PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enter through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 02:36PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36 fifty four, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the capital. At 02:47PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

J6: A TRUE TIMELINE FULL DOCUMENTARY J6: A True Timeline presents a never-before-seen timestamped blueprint for the events of January 6, 2021, as they unfolded in real-time. Credit: @InvestigateJ6 https://open.ink/collections/j6

J6 Thousands of crowdsourced video files. Hundreds of hours of CCTV footage. Dozens of police officer body cams. One True Timeline. open.ink

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

NANCY PELOSI'S DAUGHTER ADMITTING J6 WAS A HOAX Nancy Pelosi's daughter was secretly recorded talking about the fake staged J6 insurrection. Shall we keep going? You don't have to answer that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the political and legal dynamics surrounding potential investigations and trials, focusing on timing, venue, and public interest. - They agree that if Democrats lose the House and the committee is eliminated, public interest may wane. The first trials, if they occur, are expected to attract a lot of attention, similar to anniversaries, but interest could fade once Democrats are out of power and especially if Biden is removed from office. - The idea of dragging proceedings out is considered, with caution that delaying too long could reduce attention. They suggest not initiating a first trial in Washington, DC, because DC has many government workers and may be sympathetic to the defense; this relates to concerns about the potential jury pool. - There is a debate about whether the trial should be moved out of DC. Speaker 1 believes it would be difficult to move the trial and that those in DC would resist removal, arguing that hearings would be seen as fair and the jury would be impartial if held there, contrasting with Speaker 0’s concern about DC’s jury demographics. - They discuss the likelihood of successfully moving the trial, with Speaker 1 asserting that it would not be successfully moved and that the defense or supporters would resist. - The conversation touches on a hypothetical interaction with an individual who might have been involved in insurrection plans. Speaker 0 asks about what the plan would be if such an individual were in line and marching, in a military context, suggesting a scenario where operations would be outlined: “you’re gonna go here,” “you’re gonna go in by this side,” “at this time, we’re gonna take over this.” They describe the insurrection as lacking guns and involving a man “smoking pot,” noting it as the most pitiable insurrection of the 21st century. - They shift to an observation about the Proud Boys, mentioning Gavin McGinnis. Speaker 0 describes knowing Gavin from road trips to parties and finding the term “Proud Wizards” humorous when they first heard it in Brooklyn years ago. Speaker 0 characterizes McGinnis as a provocateur who says shocking things to be funny, and expresses amusement at his elevation to a prominent figure. - Speaker 0 clarifies that they have a personal history with these people and emphasizes that McGinnis says outrageous things, which they view in a historical and somewhat humorous light, contrasting with the contemporary prominence of the group. - The exchange ends with Speaker 0 explaining their familiarity with the individuals and reiterating that the portrayal of these figures is part of their broader historical context.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing, if you drag it out after the Democrats lose the house Yeah. Yeah. And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Yeah. The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. Yes. It's like anniversaries. If the first one Speaker 1: is a Speaker 0: big deal, they're gonna really be dealing the same. Right. No one's gonna care after the democrats out of power. Right. And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm sympathetic. Speaker 1: That's our the jury. That's the that's the jury issue. We we don't need the trial to be held there. Speaker 0: Well, you guys would, you totally hit off. Speaker 1: I I would. They won't successfully Speaker 0: successfully move move it? It? Speaker 1: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard of the hearings. The team. They'll you're say They're in the next say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. Speaker 0: Thank you for your Speaker 1: time. Oh, absolutely. Speaker 0: Listen. I really I I know you're not the bad guy. I mean, if there is I haven't found the bad guy yet. But if there is, I Speaker 1: know you're not guy. I mean, he's he's like a stereotypical bad guy. Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan is Speaker 1: that Really? Speaker 0: If there was a if there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line marching you're in the military. Speaker 1: You know this? No. Doesn't Speaker 0: You must have a plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. You just go to operations. It's over. You sit down Like Overnight your soldiers. You go over. Alright. You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this side. At this time, we're gonna take over this there's none of that. You move the insurrection. It's the sorriest insurrection in in the twentieth twenty first century ever. No guns. A guy Speaker 0: guy People Speaker 1: think so. Guy smoking pot. You know, Speaker 0: on Oh, I love the guy smoking Yeah. Speaker 1: I like for history. Speaker 0: You're gonna be able to laugh about this one day. I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know Gavin McGinnis. I went on road trips with them to parties. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, Proud Wizards from this was, like, years ago when they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may say he may talk shit, but a lot of it is, like, he's a provocateur. He says it to, like, be funny or whatever. Right. The idea that he's now being elevated to being this Yeah. It totally makes me laugh because I'm like, like, I know this guy. I've been in many parties with him, and I know he just says some crazy shit. I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, Speaker 1: and I was just Speaker 0: like So I just wanted you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people, I'm like, come on. You're you're like, that's just kinda like anyway.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🗳️ STOLEN ELECTIONS & THE 2020 COUP @battleofever @RedpillDrifter J6 - They Needed an Emergency Session 👉🏼 YES !! This Fed-led 'riot' distraction was NOT about 'getting Trump and MAGA' - it was a vehicle to allow Corrupt Congress to STEAL the election. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/06/fedsurrection-anniversary-day-they-needed-an-emergency-session/

Fedsurrection Anniversary Day - They Needed an Emergency Session - The Last Refuge In honor of our national gaslighting embarrassment, the third anniversary of the FBI’s fedsurrection, the FBI laughed in the faces of the general population under their control.  The DC-based FBI sent out this message: Yes, the national kidnappers have removed their masks. Y’all know what that metaphor means. Once again, for those who just walked […] theconservativetreehouse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

[Thread] #J6 (Below) Ongoing Compilation of #J6TrueTimeline Next up: 🔥 RINOs 🔥 who prepared statements beforehand, we're in on the setup, and used it as a way to dump #Trump. We are taking names. Another Thread Incoming. #J6WasASetup #AshliBabbitt #RINOsKnew

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@hollywood2pt0 - Jewely💎Blue

📽️The live footage of J6 [they] fed us was NOT LIVE Yes things happened there, but guaranteed what we were FED on NOT-live TV, as well as the pics after-the-fact, were sensationalized...MANIPULATED... PRODUCED SMOKE & MIRRORS Lest we forget what President Trump recorded, that Twitter & the rest of MSM took down to FRAME him and US.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes that on 07/18/2023 special counsel Jack Smith has decided to pursue another arrest and more indictments of President Trump, alleging it is a result of the Fed storming the Capitol on 01/06/2021 and targeting Trump for his role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on that date. He asserts that all President Trump did was give a speech and that he incited nothing. He claims the people disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were “our government.” He argues that when videos from the Capitol appeared, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, claimed the videos were manipulated, asserting they were added to with people, sound, fire, and smoke, probably mirrors, to make it look horrific. He says footage has been removed from the Internet, making reflection on 01/06 difficult, and that all remaining footage is manipulated, stating there was not all the fire and smoke and that the famous picture is a manipulated image. He asserts the rioters didn’t bring guns and that there was no fire or smoke, but instead “where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” and that history has been changed and references are no longer available. He claims that during the Fed’s direction, Trump did say on video what he should have said, including “I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There’s nothing more he could have said.” He notes the video is difficult to find but exonerates Trump, maintaining he incited nothing, especially since the feds were doing most of it. He says this video will be important in the coming weeks and months as Smith continues to go after Trump, predicting suppression of the video by social media platforms, as in the immediate aftermath of the Fed’s direction. He says he captured the video and urges sharing. Speaker 1 quotes Trump: “I know you’re pained. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very special. You’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.” Speaker 0 adds that Tucker Carlson claimed Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing the insurrection hired a Good Morning America producer to dramatize the footage and even dubbed in sound, to make it more sensational, implying the footage was staged. He questions why it would be necessary to add sound and create more people and fire or smoke to redefine the events, suggesting the feds planted and altered footage to present an insurrection. Speaker 2 reinforces the claim with a direct statement: “How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 07/18/2023. And as most of you already know, special counsel Jack Smith has decided to throw another arrest, and god only knows how many more indictments towards president Trump. And it's completely a result of the Fed storming the capital on 01/06/2021. And Smith is going after president Trump for president Trump's role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on 01/06/2021, which is funny because all president Trump did was give a speech. He incited nothing. The people that were disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were, well, they were our government. And And after all this happened, when videos started coming out from the capital, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, was the one who said what I've been saying all along, that the videos were manipulated. They, I knew, added people and sound and fire and smoke and probably mirrors to make it look horrific because it's hard to do this now because we have nothing to reference. They've removed it from the Internet, but when it was happening on the sixth, I hope you all remember that everybody that was in Washington DC while that was going on, they were having trouble getting any video or footage out to any of us on Twitter or in other states. Washington DC did exactly what they did when I was at the million mega march with my brother in November a few months prior, and they cut Internet. They wouldn't let anybody get information or very little information out. So now it's hard to reflect back on what January 6 was because all the footage has been removed from the Internet. More so, any of the footage that you can still see from 01/06/2021, mark my words, it's manipulated footage. Remember back. Think really hard. There was not all the fire and the smoke. You know that picture we all know? This one right here? This is a manipulated picture. They didn't do all of this. These people that were storming the capital didn't even bring guns with them to this insurrection. There was no fire. There was no smoke. But where there's smoke, there's fire. They've changed the history, what we saw with our eyes, and now we can't recollect it because they've removed it and our ability to reference anything. All that said, during the Fed's erection, president Trump got on video and said exactly what he should have said. This video that I'm putting up here on both Rumble and BitShoot tonight is very difficult to find unless you use the right search words, but it exonerates president Trump. Not that he needs exoneration because he incited nothing, especially because the feds were doing most of it. He said all the right words. I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There's nothing more he could have said. This is going to be a very important video coming up in the next weeks and months as Smith continues to go after president Trump. They have nothing. They are going to be suppressing this, and just like they did right after the Fed's direction, everybody that put it on Twitter or any social media platform, they would rip it down. They would suspend the person that post it. It's gonna happen again because this piece of video is everything they don't want out there for the rest of the world to see. So I've captured it for you. Share it with anyone you'd like, and get ready for the ride. Speaker 1: I know you're pained. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace. Speaker 0: And just in case you missed it, this is actually out of my video when Tucker Carlson said, this was back in March or April, that the Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing this insurrection, that they hired a Good Morning America producer to make it more sensational, and they even dubbed in sound. No. Really think about that. What would be the reason of all the reasons in the world that it would be okay, needed, necessary for those feds that planted the feds' erection to say, here's all this capital video footage. What can we do here to it that we shouldn't be doing? Well, if we add sound and we create more people and we add in fire and smoke, then all of a sudden, this becomes an insurrection. This is the footage we're gonna put out into the public. Anyway, here's Tucker and what he said just a few months ago laying it out there, and it's almost like it didn't happen. Most people didn't even catch him saying this, but it's huge. Speaker 2: How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@USA_Anne711 - ❣️Anne❣️

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 ‘Then Lied About It’. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard told reporter Neil McCabe: “Milley controlled the Army”, arguing that while the Joint Chiefs boss lacked legal authority within the chain of command, he instead leveraged his profound influence and contacts in the Pentagon to delay the Guard’s response. “The problem was not with Donald Trump; it’s Mark Milley and the Army leadership in control. They stopped the Guard from coming then lied about it and said the Guard acted at sprint speed,” Matthews explained. “This is about civilian control of the military. There was none. There is none. I argue that — Mark Milley had more control over the D.C. Guard on Jan. 6 than Donald Trump did — if Donald Trump wanted to call the Guard to go to the Capitol, Milley wouldn’t let him do it.” Details👇 https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/01/12/explosive-report-army-official-says-mark-milley-delayed-national-guard-response-to-jan-6-then-lied-about-it/

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 'Then Lied About It'. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard on January 6th, 2021, thenationalpulse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP!

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

BOMBSHELL.🚨 "It has come out in a recent federal lawsuit that U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd... issued a false radio report that 'shots were fired'..." Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter Michael Byrd Made a False Radio Call Shortly After Fatal Incident https://thepoliticsbrief.com/ashli-babbitts-shooter-michael-byrd-made-a-false-radio-call-shortly-after-fatal-incident/

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@paulsperry_ - Paul Sperry

BREAKING: Obama DOJ official Mary McCord--part of Gen. Flynn coup--secretly worked with J6 Committee's Red Team + Purple Team investigators “We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things [Trump] might do" https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159

Fears grow that Trump will use the military in ‘dictatorial ways’ if he returns to the White House Donald Trump is sparking fears among those who understand the inner workings of the Pentagon. nbcnews.com
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 12:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump called for peace and told protesters to go home on January 6. He also stepped down after the 2020 election certification. The military was not involved in the riots, and there was no mechanism for the riot to overturn election results. Most J6 defendants were charged with non-violent crimes. No one was killed by the protesters. Trump wanted National Guard troops at the Capitol, but they were not called up. The FBI tracked extremists unconstitutionally, and there were undercover officers at the riots. Capitol Police officers were seen acting cordially with protesters. Undercover MPD officers encouraged Trump supporters to go to the Capitol. The narrative of Trump inciting a riot was set early on. The Congress was initially evacuated due to pipe bomb threats. The pipe bomber has not been apprehended. Nancy Pelosi made a comment about waiting for the riots to start. Her staff was in communication with the Secret Service. Secret Service texts from January 6 are missing. The J6 committee has buried public surveillance videos.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

'Inconvenient Facts' about January 6: 1. Donald Trump said on January 6 to 'remain peaceful' and 'go home' within hours of the riots 2. Donald Trump said within hours of the 2020 election certification that he would step down and he did 3. The Commander-in-Chief did not use the military in any way on J6 4. The president did not send in unarmed extremists to "overturn the election" results, since there is no mechanism for a riot to overturn election results 5. The overwhelming majority of the J6 defendants were charged with non-violent crimes & misdemeanors 6. The J6 protesters did not kill a single person during the riots 7. Donald Trump wanted 10,000 National Guard troops at the Capitol, but D.C. Mayor Bowser, Pentagon & Speaker Pelosi refused to call them up 8. The FBI tracked extremists intending to go to the Capitol on J6 for months prior to the riots unconstitutionally using NSA technology 9. Court documents show there were dozens of undercover officers at the Capitol Riots, despite there being light security 10. Capitol Police officers were caught on video opening doors, removing barriers, and acting cordially with protesters inside the capitol building 11. There were undercover MPD officers caught on video encouraging Trump supporters to 'go to the capitol' 12. The narrative that Donald Trump would "incite" a riot had been set as early as May 2020, according to the infamous Time 'shadow cabal' article 13. The Transition Integrity Project wargamed out the 2020 election in the prior summer and in 3 of 4 scenarios ended in an "insurrection" 14. The Congress was evacuated originally over the RNC & DNC pipe bomb threats, not the riots 15. The pipe bomber has not been apprehended despite the FBI knowing the license plate & cell phone data of the suspect 16. Nancy Pelosi's own daughter documented her saying as the Capitol Riots started "I've been waiting for this" 17. Nancy Pelosi's staff was in communication with Secret Service on January 6 18. The Secret Service texts from January 6 have gone "missing" 19. The J6 partisan committee has buried tens of thousands of hours of public surveillance videos, including footage exonerating January 6 defendants

Saved - January 28, 2024 at 3:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The DNC and RNC pipe bomb threats were seen as a "back-up plan" to frame Donald Trump and his supporters for the January 6 "insurrection." Despite sitting at the headquarters for hours, the bombs were conveniently discovered just as Speaker Nancy Pelosi began the election certification. Oddly, Kamala Harris was secretly at the DNC headquarters during this time. The suspect's cell phone data was corrupted, footage manipulated, and Secret Service texts deleted. The FBI has failed to find the suspect, while law enforcement failed to find the DNC bomb that was in plain sight. The discoveries coincided with Trump's speech and the expected election challenges in Congress. The reports on the bombs were handled by Capitol Police, who report to Pelosi. The truth of what happened on January 6 is clear with proper investigation and an open mind.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

The J6 Pipe Bomb Threats Were the "Back-up Plan" The DNC & RNC pipe bomb threats were the "back-up plan" in the plot to frame Donald Trump and his supporters for an "insurrection" on January 6. They would have been a secondary justification to adjourn the Congress and suspend the election objections, should the manufactured riots not materialize as expected. In fact, the RNC/DNC pipe bomb threats led to the evacuation of the Cannon building and a Library of Congress building. This was no accident. Despite the "pipe bombs" — which appear to be non-functional because they lack batteries, and appear much like FBI training pipe bombs — sitting at the RNC & DNC headquarters for approximately 17 HOURS, they were both discovered within 30 minutes of Speaker Nancy Pelosi beginning the election certification in Congress. The DNC video shows MPD and Secret Service who are unperturbed by the presence of the "pipe bomb" and even allow pedestrians, including children, to walk nearby. Then, they dismantle the apparently inert pipe bomb with a robot. All while Kamala Harris, a U.S. Senator who should have been at the Congress, and a "historic" Vice President Elect, was inexplicably and secretively at the DNC headquarters. This goes beyond oddity. Especially when you learn that the cell phone data from the suspect was "corrupted," the J6 suspect footage was manipulated, and the Secret Service texts from both January 5th and 6th were "deleted." The DOJ to this day is still hunting down MAGA grandmas for merely looking at the Capitol on J6 — regardless of actions or intent — but "cannot" find the J6 pipe bomb suspect, despite extensive surveillance footage, knowledge of the person's license plate, and where several of the bomb components were purchased. But not only has the FBI failed to find the suspect, law enforcement failed to find the DNC "bomb" that sat in broad daylight for hours (someone even had a cup of coffee next to it). Somehow this Wile E. Coyote-looking device eluded detection by MPD and Secret Service. What are the odds? The J6 pipe bomb 'discoveries' came right as Trump ended his speech and moments prior to the expected election challenges in Congress. The RNC pipe bomb was 'discovered' by an intel-connected staffer whose report was handled by Capitol Police. The DNC pipe bomb was 'found' by a plainclothes Capitol Police officer. Both report to Pelosi. Who wasn't allowed to be questioned by the partisan J6 committee? Pelosi. Whose House Sergeant at Arms could have called for the National Guard at any time? Pelosi's. Whose House SAA turned down Capitol Police Chief Sund's requests for help from the National Guard? Pelosi's. It is painfully obvious what happened on January 6. All it takes is a pair of eyes, functional brain cells, and a mind open enough to investigate and process it.

Saved - April 26, 2024 at 5:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jan 6 was a setup used to vilify Trump and the MAGA movement. FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters were involved. Questions about Ray Epps' involvement remain unanswered. The Jan 6 Committee fabricated a TV production and lied about pipe bombs. Officer Dunn's account is not corroborated by video evidence. Pelosi's Security Chief perjured himself. Mistakes and a rejected National Guard offer contributed to Jan 6. Trump called for peace. Biden prioritizes hunting down Jan 6 patriots over border security. The uniparty aims for single party rule. Lara Logan's Fed-Surrection series questions Ray Epps' treatment. Epps had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass. Whistleblowers contradict the Capitol riot committee's story.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Today is a good day to remind everyone that Jan 6 was a setup, used by the uniparty, feds and intel agencies to entrap, vilify and attempt to destroy Trump and the MAGA movement. THREAD 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions if this could be the biggest setup or crime in the country's history. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of uncovering the truth and the cover-ups post-January 6th, even if it involves Republicans. Speaker 1 commits to following the evidence, regardless of where it leads. Speaker 0 holds Speaker 1 accountable for this commitment. Translation: Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the significance of revealing the truth and uncovering cover-ups post-January 6th, even if it involves members of Speaker 1's own party. Speaker 1 pledges to follow the evidence, no matter the consequences. Speaker 0 reminds Speaker 1 of this commitment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it potentially the biggest setup in the history of this country? Potentially. One of the greatest crimes against the American people? Speaker 1: That's why it's so important to get the truth with this. That's what we're working for. And the cover ups that happened after January 6th is what I'm really after as well. Speaker 0: What about the Republicans involved in those coverups? I know it's hard for you to address those things. This is your own party, but this is the reality. I mean Speaker 1: We're gonna go where evidence leads. Speaker 0: No matter what? Speaker 1: No matter what. Speaker 0: I'm gonna hold you to that. Yes.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

"Whatever else January 6th was... IT WAS NOT A TRUMP-LED INSURECTION." -Tucker Carlson

Video Transcript AI Summary
The January 6th incident was not a Trump-led insurrection, as he was at the White House calling for calm. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Trump an insurrectionist, barring him from the state's ballot. Critics celebrated this decision, claiming it was a victory against voters' desires. Colorado Secretary of State Griswold stated that accusations on TV are enough to disqualify a candidate, bypassing legal processes. This undemocratic behavior signals a troubling trend.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was pretty puzzling to watch. Whatever else January 6th was, and in some ways, we still don't know exactly what it was, it was not a Trump led insurrection. The crowd had no guns. They had no plan to overthrow the government. Nothing like that has ever emerged. And above all, Trump was not leading it. He was miles away at the White House at the time where he issued a public statement calling for calm and nonviolence. So why were the people on television telling us that Trump led an insurrection? This was, of course, a lie, but it was also a very obvious lie. So, clearly, we are watching the rollout of a talking point, words crafted for a specific purpose. But what was the purpose? We got an answer to that question yesterday when the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that because he led an insurrection, Donald Trump's name cannot appear on the state's ballot next fall. The 4 liberal judges who concluded this cited as their justification article 3 of the 14th amendment, which was written in 18/68 to keep former Confederate officials from holding office. That was the sum total of their reasoning. Despite the fact Donald Trump has never been convicted by any court of insurrection, and although the 14th amendment specifically does not apply to the presidency, Donald Trump cannot run for president because he's an insurrectionist. This seemed like lunacy because it was lunacy. 3000 miles away in El Salvador, there was no question about what was happening. The United States has lost its ability to lecture any other country about, quote, democracy, wrote Salvador and president Nayib Bukele. And yet in this country, no one on the left dared say that. Instead, Donald Trump's enemy celebrated. The Atlantic magazine expressed gratitude that unelected judges had, quote, rescued the country from the desires of voters, because, actually, that's democracy. And then there was Jenna Griswold. That's the Colorado Secretary of State. You may not have seen her before, but you will instantly recognize the category she represents. Unhappy 39 year old liberal women with Ivy League degrees and a deep streak of authoritarian impulses. Here's Griswold on MSNBC last night explaining that a conventional legal process is no longer necessary for the left to get its way. No more trials or evidence or jury verdicts. An accusation made on television is now enough to remove a front runner from the presidential race. If Nancy Pelosi and Joe Scarborough call you bad, Americans are not allowed to vote for you. Watch. Speaker 1: Look. I believe he incited the insurrection. There were big questions around section 3 of the 14th amendment, and the Colorado Supreme Court has weighed in in a very loud way, making themselves clear. Frankly, we've never had a president try to steal the presidency and engage in insurrection, ever before. So Trump's actions are unprecedented. The Colorado Supreme Court confirmed that the district court got it right, that he did engage in insurrection. I think, section 3 of the 14th amendment has to apply to the presidency because if not, it's a get out of jail free card. And in a country of laws where no man is is above another, we can't have one office be able to do whatever they want when it comes to rebellion and then be able to be seated in office again. Speaker 0: None of this seems very American. All that looks like the actual end of democracy.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Rep Clay Higgins: "Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capital on Jan 6th, prior to the doors being open?" Director Wray: "Again, I have to be very careful..." Higgins: "It should be a no!"

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the events at the Capitol on January 6th were a setup, pointing to men dressed as Trump supporters inside the building before doors were opened. They question if there were confidential human sources involved. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and denies having such sources present. Additionally, they mention police officers seen changing attire from uniform to Trump supporter clothing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was a set up. I mean, if you clearly have men dressed as Trump supporters walking around inside the capitol on the other side of police officers who are, to one extent or another, not engaged with them like they're not concerned about them, then you have a a set of closed doors, like exterior doors and interior doors closed, and you have police officers positioned outside and then in between the two doors and then on the inside of the second set of doors. Doors weren't open yet. What time was it? Video. This was a a couple of videos that Trump was still speaking. Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being opened? Again, I had to be very careful It should be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital. Gentleman's time has expired. Not read anything into my decision not to share information. Director Ray, film this time has expired. We have other evidence, specific observations of police officers, Capitol Police, or Metro, both entering rooms and here in the Capitol in uniform and coming out as Trump supporters and construction workers.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Rep Clay Higgins: there were "well over 200" FBI assets involved in Jan 6, including some dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol and leading people to key locations.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three years after the events of January 6th, Congressman Clay Higgins questions FBI Director Christopher Wray about the presence of FBI assets among the protesters. Higgins believes there is evidence that FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters were inside the Capitol before the doors were opened, suggesting entrapment. He claims that the FBI infiltrated online groups and planted seeds of radical actions. Higgins estimates that there were over 200 FBI assets involved in the events of January 6th. He also criticizes the shooting of Ashley Babbitt and expresses his hope that the evidence will be released to the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been exactly 3 years since January 6th, the events of January 6th. The racist insurrection that shocked this nation to its core, more profoundly than anything since Pearl Harbor plus the civil war. And it has taken a while, honestly, even for people who aren't on the side of the professional liars to realize there's something amiss about what happened that day. Not just the response, the largest law enforcement mobilization in the history of the United States, that was obviously disproportionate because it wasn't the worst riot that year, not even close. But the day itself, there was something about January 6th that didn't feel right, and hovering over that day has remained the question to what extent was it a setup. And we still don't really know, but what's interesting is how few people have asked that entirely legitimate question. One of the very few, really one of the only in the United States Congress, is a member called Clay Higgins from Louisiana. And in case you haven't seen this clip, it's worth rewatching. This is from 2022 at Homeland Security Committee hearing where he asked it just directly of the FBI director. Why? Speaker 1: Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6th protesters and on January 6, 2021? Speaker 2: Well, Congressman, as I'm sure you can appreciate, I have to be very careful about what I can say about when Speaker 1: Even now because that's what you told us a few years ago. Speaker 2: Matt finish. About when we do and do not and where we have and have not used confidential human sources. But to the extent that there's a suggestion, for example, that the FBI's confidential human sources or FBI employees in some way instigated or orchestrated January 6th, that's categorically false. Speaker 1: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being open? Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful Speaker 1: about no. Can you not tell the American people, no. We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol. Gentlemen, time has expired. Speaker 2: Not read anything into my decision not to share information Director Ray. Speaker 1: Confidentially. Time has expired. Speaker 0: What a sleazy, repulsive, little authoritarian liar Chris Rea is. That's obvious when you watch that tape. The sad part is so few tapes like that exist because so few have confronted him directly and ask questions to which the entire country has a right to know the answer like that one. Clay Higgins did that. Congressman from Louisiana Louisiana Lafayette joins us in studio. Congressman, thanks so much for coming up. Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Tuck. Speaker 0: So that was over a year ago that you asked that question, which is a central question, and you asked it as I think is without any embarrassment at all on behalf of your constituents and the rest of the country, are you any closer to the answer now? Speaker 1: Well, we're closer to being in a position where we can reveal the answers that we already have. Much of the evidence that we have compiled from investigative effort over the the course of the last couple of years. Some offices like my own would have operated in silos of investigative endeavor, have now been able to come together now that we have a Republican majority and we have access to the to the to the staffs of the appropriate investigative committees. And so I sit on the oversight committee and we republicans run that committee now, therefore, we control the staff. So when you can magnify the efforts that individual, members of congress have have have pushed within our own offices. When you can magnify those efforts by the the skill and the numbers of staff from the committees, you you you get a lot of evidence reviewed professionally and aligned and assembled into essentially a case file. And in in this case, this is a big file because the the the involvement of of certain actors, you could say deep state actors within the federal government, to set the stage for, what happened in in j 4, 5, and 6, and and to, entrap thousands of Americans from across the country and to lure them into this this set stage on j 4, 5, and 6. The people that were involved in that is is is quite a large web. So, yes, sir, we do have a great deal of evidence compiled, and we are we are gradually, professionally, rolling that evidence out. So you sort of Speaker 0: answered the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume law enforcement intel and military, and I'm using your words, lured Americans to Washington into what you called a trap. Yes, sir. So that would I mean, that's a shocking and I assume that's a that's a sober conclusion based on the evidence. That's what you're saying. Speaker 1: That's that would be my sober assessment as an investigator, and I'm, you know, I'm quite a I love my country, and and I've I've always been a staunch defender of the thin blue line. And I I would proudly count the FBI amongst that number. They're just like brothers to me. So to find that level of, of conspiratorial corruption at the highest levels of the FBI has been very troubling to me as a man, as a cop. And and yet, did you know, you follow the evidence wherever it leads, and Yes. This is what investigators do. So, when I asked Christopher Wray that that question, for instance, I already knew the answer. I had reviewed compelling evidence that the that FBI had assets, human assets, dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol prior to the doors being open and the masses allowed in. So I I knew that the FBI was deeply involved. I'd seen evidence even at that time with, that the FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of Americans who were essentially voicing their their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about COVID oppression. Those Americans were targeted by the FBI, almost universally Republicans and and, largely Trump supporters, but the FBI worked undercover to infiltrate those conversations and become a significant part of those individual Americans' communications. And when you dig into the evidence that we've we've had revealed through through some criminal cases that I've I've followed and worked with the families of j six, political detainees and Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in in the capital that day. And some of that evidence is shockingly reveals that the the the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were were the first ones to plant the seeds of of, suggestions of of a more radical occupation of the capital and and they were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would would begin acknowledging that, you know, yeah, maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the the origins of those conversations, they they were started by the the FBI undercover guy that was operating inside the group, and then months later, on January 4th, 5th, 6th, many of those Americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where American patriots assembled to object to to everything that had happened during 2020, the COVID depression, and the the stunning results of what we believe was a compromised election cycle in November 2020. So Americans gathered at their own capital to to appropriately air grievances and protests at their capital, but embedded amongst their number was an FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months. So this was the level of, of manipulative effort that the FBI invested into American citizenry and our our assembly online to, and to exercise our rights under the first amendment, to talk to each other about whatever we wanna talk about, including the the the insidious suppressions of COVID that we were suffering across the country. So and our concerns about where the election was going, the whole mail in ballot thing, we could see the stage was being set for a compromised election cycle possibly, and to our horror, that's what happened. So FBI had fingerprints on this thing from for many months prior to j 4, 5, and 6. Speaker 0: I wanna go back to something you said in the first sentence, which is you have seen evidence and that spurred your questions to Chris Wray that there were FBI assets dressed as Trump's supporters within the capital. So that is proof of entrapment because, of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the capital building. Aren't that many doors. You work there, you know. But they allowed people in on purpose to entrap them. That's what that proves, I think. Does it not? Speaker 1: Well, it's certainly condemning. It's another piece of the of the strategy that the that the government employed to sort of complete the entrapment of Americans that they had had, infiltrated and then prodded and provoked with online with the with the those original seeds planted of of, actions like, you know, what type of gear to wear and and and just in language that incited behavior that could go the wrong way. You know, pushing actions of of legal and legitimate peaceful protest to an edge where where those Americans would likely not have gone had they not been been, you know, encouraged by the FBI plant amongst their number that they didn't know was there. So by the time it was actually j 6 and you had you had, masses of Americans assembled outside the capitol, like, 99.9%, 100% peaceful. On the inside, you had FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters that knew their way around the Capitol. Before the doors even open. Before the doors open, or else how are you gonna get around the Capitol? You've been there many times. You need a guide to get from whatever door you go in. It's a labyrinth. It's it's it's a maze inside there. So you that's right. So there's no way just Americans, most of which had never been to the capitol, there's no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to the to the statuary or the house chamber or the senate chamber. It's just not possible. So the the the FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to to specifically waive in the the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the capitol, and the doors opened and they were allowed in. And on the inside were were oh, there's some more Trump supporters, but really those were FBI assets, law enforcement assets that knew their way around the capital. And they they waved those guys in, said, come on. Follow us. And they they are the ones that led them on the path directly. Speaker 0: Now how Speaker 1: do you think of guys Never been to the capital. Gotta gotta come into the capital all amped up on on emotion and make his way straight to Nancy Pelosi's office. Come on. It's like I couldn't get it. There's no way. I've been there for 7 years. Could come in some random door at the capitol and make my way to the next year. Speaker 0: Is unmarked. I mean, those leadership offices are unmarked. So how would Speaker 1: you know? It's confusing to get around in the capitol. Every American that has been there knows this. When you go on a tour, you bring your family to DC, you go through the capitol, you have to have a guide. And and on January 6th, the guides were FBI assets, the law enforcement assets, and they were dressed as Trump supporters. They were positioned inside the capital prior to the doors being opened so that the Americans that had assembled outside the capital, once allowed in, could be brought directly to the areas where the FBI, the DOJ, and the deep state actors knew would be the most, the most sort of condemning criminal action of of Americans being a lot being inside the capital, protesting without permit and things. So they knew it was setting the stage for arrest and prosecution. It's such a crime. Who who planned this, do you think? I think factions planned this. I wouldn't say who talked about it because that yeah. I don't think there was one person that that planned this, but I believe the the faction of, establishment liberals within the the FBI and the Democrat party and our intelligence services to to another extent, use their massive powers of surveillance and, in and investigative assets that they have across the country, confidential informants, registered informants, non registered informers, voluntary informers. It's a it's a complex web of of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn't take much, the faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services that would coordinate with with the most extreme liberal, factions within the Democrat party that were desperate to keep Trump out of office and and, you know, worked within the the theater of operations, shall we say, that had been that had been set by the COVID alleged medical emergencies nationwide and millions and millions of mail in ballots. There's no daylight between the the compromised election cycle of November 2020 and ultimately what happened on on on j6. So you ask who planned this? This would be the combination of several of the most extreme liberal, anti Trump, anti America First factions that, that were in positions of authority within our federal law enforcement organizations and the the Democrat party across the country. Speaker 0: Can when you say that there were FBI assets in the crowd, in in the building beforehand and and certainly outside, What's the scale of this? You're talking like 10, 20? No. Speaker 1: Based upon some very conservative, but, like, hard investigative effort evaluation of of the numbers, from putting together eyewitnesses and and videos and, and affidavit statement, and whistleblower statements, and court records that have been revealed through individual criminal cases where j6 defendants have been prosecuted and smart attorneys have forced, admissions by the DOJ and the FBI, but those admissions have been sealed within the parameter of that criminal case by protective order by the judge, so they I can't share them, but I've seen them. So real hard objective and conservative, estimates would would put the number of FBI assets in the crowd outside and working inside at at well over 200. 200? Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. So you're in law enforcement. Yeah. Yeah. Before you came to congress in the military as well. That seems that's an extraordinary number. Is it? Speaker 1: Well, no. When you think about the scope of the operation, if you were gonna do this, you would need you would Speaker 0: need that relative to so like when, I don't know, Minneapolis burned down or when Saint John's, the Episcopal Church of Carson, the White House in Lafayette Square was set ablaze, and all the secret service agents were injured. Were there 200 FBI assets in the crowd among Antifa then? Speaker 1: I mean, I I don't know how many undercover agents FBI would have in a situation like that, but but but but j6 was the was the was the final act prior to arrest and prosecution of of Americans that that were identified as as Trump supporters. I mean, the objective was to destroy the entire mega movement, to to forever stain the, the patriotic fervor that was associated with the America First Mega Movement that had won in 2016 and we believe won again in 2020, and the the establishment, on both sides, both major parties were determined to to smash that out of existence, not just by defeating Trump, but by destroying the reputations of the movement itself, by creating this narrative that was totally false, but but was heavily pushed that the that mega Republicans, America First Republicans are somehow a danger to our republic and a a domestic terror threat, which is a whole another story about what the FBI has done to tagging Americans as, suspected domestic terrorists and and following us as we travel across the country. But the the bottom line is that, 200 as a I I believe is a conservative number. First of all, I think there were there's many more. But a number that I'm comfortable going on record with is that we believe that there were that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the capitol, embedded into groups that entered the capitol or provoked entry of the capitol and working with FBI assets that would have included Metro Police and Capitol Police that were dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol. So given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged, and the number of people that were actually outside the capital and it entered, we believe 200 is a conservative number. Yes, sir. Speaker 0: It's it's shocking what you're saying. It confirms everyone's worst suspicions about this. It's clearly true. Did you come across any evidence that the the DOD, the military, either Defense Intelligence Agency or National Guard or any part of the US military played any role in this at all? Speaker 1: I have not seen that. I've heard the echoes of that suspicion, and I have I have observed, circumstantial evidence that that has been presented to me, that I've that I have reviewed. But to but to me, it does not rise to the level that I would call, actionable from an investigative perspective. So there's some there was some some suspicion but in in in law enforcement the thresholds you're looking across is reasonable suspicion that would prompt a criminal investigation, and then the next threshold is probable cause, which you need for arrest. And then of course in our system, finally, the last threshold is is, is conviction, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. So then I I did review evidence, Tucker, regarding some suspicions of military involvement in some way. But and I and I've I have reviewed some of that evidence that that has been that I've been able to get my hands on, and, I do not think that the the military was, was involved, not at the level most certainly not at the level of the the FBI and over the course of all of 2020. And then on j 4, 5, and 6, the FBI working in coordination with other law enforcement assets that that they roped into the operation Right. From Metro PD, from DC, and and, the Capitol Police were sort of, sort of tricked into participating with the with what the FBI had been staging for, you know, 10 months. Speaker 0: Just if you take 3 steps back, this is not democracy. So the federal agencies serve under the oversight of the elected president, and then under the oversight of the elected congress. Their elected people get to make the decisions. Your Republican president, you now have a Republican congress, and neither one can get a straight answer from the FBI. No no one has any control of the FBI. You're describing a government within a government. Speaker 1: Well, in America, a question becomes reasonable men would would would ask when we face a crisis like this, who investigates the investigate? Right. And the answer in America is is Congress. So we we have the responsibility to investigate through the appropriate committees, which would we're certainly we're certainly doing that now that we have a Republican majority and control of the committees, but we don't have the power to arrest. We can we can give criminal referrals based upon our investigative efforts, but we have to have a DOJ that's receptive to the criminal referrals. So we we've hit quite a a brick wall, have we not? Constitutionally, we we have the responsibility to investigate objectively, and and and anyone that knows me know that's exactly what I'm I'm pursuing. I do not have I'm not trying to create a crime to fit a narrative to blame on the FBI. I'm following the evidence, and and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level. And a and a a conspiracy within our government at the highest level to create the the, to set the stage for a compromised election cycle in 2020, and then the the the actions that took place on j 4, 5, and 6, and then the the criminal investigation, arrest, and prosecution of Americans that they were able to entrap and document with the thousands of cameras that were operating that day and use that evidence that they knew they were setting up to investigate, arrest, and prosecute the Americans that they had entrapped. So Congress can investigate these things, and we are, and we will reveal these horrific truths, and we will have criminal referrals, But until you have a a a president running the executive branch that will clean house at the DOJ and FBI at the highest levels and put American patriots in place that will be that will act upon the criminal referrals that that congress provides, then none of those guys are gonna get arrested because they're not gonna arrest themselves, and we don't have arrest authority. Speaker 0: I'm a little surprised and don't expect to be critical of your colleagues in the Republican conference, but, I mean, they do control the house. Impeachment is a thing. Chris Ray is still the FBI director. I watched Republicans, some of whom I know cheer the murder of Ashley Babbitt, who was an unarmed woman less than 55, by Michael Byrd. They were Michael Byrd's side, and it I have to say for a lot of Republican voters that I count myself among them very clarifying. If you're cheering Ashley Babbitt's murder shooting women now, that's okay because she likes Trump. And the Republicans are like, yeah. I was happy. Like, a lot of them thought that. What the hell? Speaker 1: Yeah. That was and it it made me sick. Me too. You know, there's a a great responsibility when you when you wear a badge in America. I mean, think about it. To be to be the to be the designated servant of your community that has that has the the authority to, to deny the freedom of a fellow American in the land of the free. Like, doesn't have a responsibility. So the the escalation of of force is must be appropriate in order to effect a lawful arrest, and and a a bad a bad shoot is the worst thing that an officer can possibly be involved in in his in his career. It's it's, you know, we it's it's it's the thing of nightmares for for good police officers. So to take what was in what would from a law enforcement perspective was clearly a bad shoot because there's some basic rules you just cannot violate. You have to attempt to effect an arrest before you can go to deadly force. There was there was no attempt to arrest Ashley Babin. There were there were officers on the other side of the window she was climbing through. There were officers on the interior side of the window she was climbing through. There was no indication that had been that this had been going on for an hour, and there was no reports on the radio or anywhere else of gunfights. So there was no reason at that point to expect that Ashley Babin or anybody else in the in the crowd was gonna produce a firearm and start firing on police officers. Why? Because it had not happened. So that's part of the totality of circumstance that a police officer is responsible for knowing. We stay in constant communication with our radios, we know what's going on. That officer that that pulled that trigger which shot a a American woman who was clearly in a in, like, a physically compromised position climbing through the broken glass of a of a window is not, you know, it's not like she just stepped into the cage in MMA and she was ready to fight. She was climbing through a window draped in a flag, there's police officers on the other side of the window, there's police officers on the interior side of the window. So you have plenty enough officer presence If you wanna arrest that woman, then by all means, pull it through the window, you know, put flex cuffs on her and throw her in the corner. We'll get to you later, ma'am. We're kinda busy right now. That's what you do. You'd have grabbed that woman and pulled her through the and threw her in the corner, or handed her back to somebody that could pull her back, you know, from that front line right there. So understand that very well understand officers have to make split second decisions, but you never you never make a decision to use lethal force unless it's absolutely called for and required, if you're losing a fight attempting to effect an arrest, then then yeah, if there's if if the officer's life is in danger, he's all by himself, but there's never should be a circumstance where you just pull the trigger and a woman climbs through a window that's clearly unarmed. There's no evidence of gunplay from the crowd that she's coming from. You got officers on both side of where she is. If you gotta arrest her, then by all means, arrest her. You know, to put flex cuffs on her and and move on. So, you know, she'd nannle the next person trying to come through the window, but she don't shoot her. So that was bad. Speaker 0: To do, there's an invest a real investigation. Was cheered. Speaker 1: Yep. Why do you think that was? And there's this in there's this insanity that has taken hold in the in the the minds and hearts of many otherwise reasonable American citizens where they do they they hate Trump so much. Like, they're they're so deeply embedded and they're they've sold their souls to the establishment that when we had an America first president and and he and he, like, stopped the, the military industrial complex forward momentum and and he and he began restoring power to individual members of congress and restoring individual rights and freedoms and sovereignty of the State, and he took away the actions of the cartels and brought this this real common sense approach to the executive branch and was leading our country in that beautiful direction. This was interfering with the business model of the establishment. So many career politicians on both sides of the aisle And I, you know, I don't like those guys, man. I'm not one of them. And I I served my country in congress, but, I I don't consider myself a politician by any means. I'm a servant to We The People. Some of these guys, man, they pop out of the womb to be to be politicians. They get groomed their whole life, you know, to be a a career politician. And those are the ones that had this instinctive cheer for something really bad happening to a Trump supporter. You know, they their true color showed in that moment and was an ugly color. Yeah. That's it. Speaker 0: We shouldn't be shooting women, number 1. I couldn't agree more. So where where does this go from here? You have this corpus of information. It It sounds like it's definitive. When does the public see the detail, and what's the process after that? Speaker 1: It's a good question. So evidence from criminal investigations by nature is rather secretive, But there is a, a tremendous compilation of data that I think should be made completely available to the public, and that's the digital files from from j 4, 5, and 6. This is where, speaker Mike Johnson can be a champion for for that will be remembered for throughout history as the speaker of the house that fully released unredacted, digital files from j 4, 5, and 6 completely to the American people. And within that data is full truth, and and the American people, is there's only staff large enough to, you know, frame by frame, go through 80,000 hours of digital evidence. Nobody has a staff big enough to do that, but we can crowdsource it to the American people. So you ask when will this evidence be released? I'd and I've I've been encouraging speaker Johnson, as I did speaker McCarthy to, my god, man, release this data to the American people. Speaker 0: Why won't why won't they? Speaker 1: I believe speaker Johnson will, but but Mike is a is is quite a skilled constitutionalist attorney himself, and he's a very measured, patient, faithful man. So I I have I extend trust to to speaker Johnson when he says that it's his intention to fully release the the call the j six tapes, but really it's digital evidence, it's more than it's more than just video evidence, it's it's a lot. It's, you know, radio transcripts, the whole thing. I believe speaker Johnson knows that this is a significant, duty that he must he he he must perform for the American people. It's a moment in history where where, you know, I believe our lord and savior has placed him in that in that position of service to the country, and he has a responsibility to to fully release that data. And then the American people will see for themselves what some of us have already learned to our horror to be true. Speaker 0: Congressman Higgins, thank you very much. Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not commit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

"We're here to storm the capitol." -Ray Epps

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses intent to storm the Capitol. Speaker 1 discusses Reyes' actions before the Capitol breach. The mob storms the Capitol. Questions arise about Reyes' involvement in inciting the violence. No clear answers are given.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here to fight now. We're here to I'm here to. I'm not kidding you. We're here to storm the capital. Hell yeah. Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe, Owen. Yeah. Be safe, brother. Speaker 1: That one moment changed what we knew about Reyes that night when he whispered, storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation. Speaker 0: Of supporters of president Trump stormed the US Capitol Building. Thousands storming the Capitol. This mob that stormed the Capitol. Stormed the Capitol. Stormed the capitol. Stormed the Capitol. Stormed the US Capitol Building. Speaker 1: Stormed the United States Capitol. We are Speaker 0: going to the Capitol where our problems are. It's that direction. Miss Sandburn, was Ray Absa fed? Speaker 1: Sir, I cannot answer that question. Speaker 0: The next day the next day, on January 6, mister Epps is seen whispering to a person and 5 seconds later, 5 seconds after he's whispering to a person, that same person begins to forcibly tear down the barricades. Did mister Epps urge them to tear down the barricades? Speaker 1: There are similar to the other answers. I cannot answer that.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Senator Ted Cruz: "Was Ray Epps a Fed?" FBI: "Sir, I cannot answer that question." Cruz: "Did Mr. Epps urge them to tear down the barricades?" FBI: "Sir, similar to the other answers, I cannot answer that."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ms. Sandburn was asked if Ray Epps incited violence, but she couldn't answer. The next day, Epps was seen whispering to someone who then tore down barricades. When asked if Epps encouraged this, she couldn't provide a clear answer. Translation (if needed): Ms. Sandburn was asked if Ray Epps incited violence, but she couldn't answer. The next day, Epps was seen whispering to someone who then tore down barricades. When asked if Epps encouraged this, she couldn't provide a clear answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ms. Sandburn, was Ray Absa Fad? Sir, I cannot answer that question. The next day, the next day, on January 6, Mr. Epps is seen whispering to a person and five seconds later, 5 seconds after he's whispering to a person, that same person begins to forcibly tear down the barricades. Did mister Epps urge them to tear down the barricades? Sir, similar to the other answers, I cannot answer that.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

“I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it.” -Ray Epps “[Ray Epps] committed multiple crimes on that day." -US Attorney Michael Gordon, transcript from Ray Epps' sentencing hearing

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Why did the Jan 6 Committee: ➡️ Fabricate a TV production to manipulate the American people? ➡️ Conspire with the FBI and the media? ➡️ Lie about the pipe bombs? ➡️ Hide and destroy evidence?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thompson's committee gathered compelling information and brought in a former ABC News president to present it effectively. They envisioned the investigation as a miniseries with 9 episodes covering specific themes. The first hearing, a prime time event, aimed to emphasize the importance of the investigation. The stakes were high, and the team worked hard to engage the audience. The hearing began with anticipation, hoping to capture and maintain viewers' attention. Chairman Thompson emphasized the need for the presentation to be impactful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thompson's committee had gathered a trove of information. The challenge, what to do with it. Speaker 1: The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling. The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way. So that's why we brought in the former president of ABC News. Speaker 2: Yeah. I got a call pretty much out of the blue, from the January 6th committee. They wanted they wanted a storyteller. And while they were brilliant, they were brilliant lawyers. Storytelling for a mass audience is not what they do. Speaker 3: To bring in a guy like this who would think outside the box really did prove to be fruitful. And it was Goldston who really began to envision this as, in a way, a kind of miniseries that there would be, you know, sort of 9 episodes and that these episodes would tackle particular themes. Speaker 4: A attack on the Capitol, the investigation. Speaker 0: The first hearing was prime time television. Speaker 5: As the nation is about to witness a defining moment. The first hearing before the country, the results of the January 6th investigation. Speaker 4: This is an extraordinary moment in American history. Speaker 2: When it came to that first hearing, we knew how high the stakes were. Speaker 6: Is about to hold its first prime time hearing. Speaker 2: We were either gonna, you know, make people realize that this is important, you know, or once once you've lost them, you've you've lost them for good. Speaker 7: On the evening of June 9th, 8:0:1 PM, the doors opened. My heart was beating pretty fast on June 9th, and it it was a real question, of is this gonna work or not? Speaker 8: Alright, everybody. Here we go. 5 on the line, please. Speaker 2: I'm in this tiny control room right up the stairs from Cannon Caucus, and we count down to to the start of the hearing. And at that point, what can you do? Speaker 9: Here we go. In 321. Speaker 10: The select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol will be in order without objection. Speaker 7: We wanted to make sure that this was a presentation that would grab the audience and hold on to him. Chairman Thompson loved to say, it's got a pop.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Why did USCP Officer Harry Dunn lie under oath at the J6 Committee Hearing? “[Dunn] won a Congressional Gold Medal and got a lucrative book deal for his account of events on J6. But a review of video evidence from that day does not corroborate his story."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police is under scrutiny for allegedly providing false testimony. His book details his experiences on January 6th, including instances of distress and erratic behavior. There are concerns about the accuracy of his accounts and his actions during the events. The Capitol Police's portrayal of Dunn as a hero is contrasted with criticism of his behavior, raising questions about the narrative surrounding January 6th. Dunn's actions and statements are being closely examined for inconsistencies and potential manipulation of information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Private first class Harry Dunn from the United States Capitol Police. Officer Harry Dunn acted with remarkable courage and valor to defend both our institutions and our people. Speaker 1: The Capitol police officer assigned to the protective detail of then house speaker Nancy Pelosi appears to have given false testimony. Speaker 2: This is brought in to corroborate the testimony of another Capitol Police officer. Speaker 3: It is imperative that we establish the truth of that day. Speaker 4: It's a Capitol police officer who just took the stand in the oath keeper's trial. Speaker 1: Sentenced to 18 years in prison. Generations Speaker 0: to come will think of him. Speaker 2: It never happened. The way he unpacks the stories Speaker 5: I don't conflate my story. Sounds like something a useful Speaker 0: idiot would Speaker 1: say. Speaker 6: Officer Harry Dunn in his new book, Standing My Ground, a Capitol Police Officer's Fight for Accountability and Good Trouble. Speaker 7: Officer Dunn has been among the 1st Capitol Police officers to describe what happened to law enforcement on January 6th. It Speaker 2: is expected that when somebody does release a book that they're going to do book tour that they're going to make media appearances. The most unique and interesting thing about this book tour that he is on is that for some reason, no other, none other of the Capitol Police officers are allowed to tell their stories. Speaker 6: What if Donald Trump wins again with his Speaker 2: Let's make no mistake about it. There were a lot of officers injured that day. I have reviewed 100 and 100 of hours of video and there was violence. I saw violence there that day with my own eyes. And the dozens of media interviews that he has participated in. Speaker 6: Seen on TV many times. Speaker 2: Has anybody ever showed a single second of video of his heroic actions that day. Speaker 6: We need heroes like you. Speaker 2: What we learned from the book though, he goes into great detail about his own history of therapies, counseling sessions. Speaker 5: And I'm now receiving private counseling therapy for the persistent emotional trauma of that day. Speaker 2: Mostly dealing with anger issues. And of course, we did see some of those anger issues displayed. Get the fuck out of here. So he was already distressed, already seeing things, imagining things, escalating things in his own mind in a way that other officers weren't. I'm not gonna try and play psychologist because I'm not one. There's just something wrong Speaker 0: with him. Speaker 2: One of those incidences took place at the top of a stairwell down in the crypt. It's a staircase that leads down to the lower terrace where a lot of officers were receiving first aid for their injuries. He was surrounded by some Metropolitan Police officers when inexplicably he just lost control. There was nobody doing any violence of any type in that room at the time. In fact, there was only a very, very small handful of protesters in the crypt at that moment. And they were all the way across the room and he just started screaming and shouting obscenities across the room. And at that moment, Captain Ben Smith of the United States Capitol Police ran over to him, put his hand on his shoulder, calm down Harry, calm down. Couple of minutes later, Perry broke out and run towards the staircase that led up to what they call the small rotunda or the speakers lobby. And as he's running towards those stairs, he accidentally hit the button on his magazine from his M4 automatic weapon. The magazine bounces off the floor, 3 other officers run over, one of them picks it up and hands it to him and Harry runs to the top of the stairs. He's clearly agitated. He's in a high level of distress, not because he's been fighting with anyone when he reached the top of that stairs. That was the moment when Oathkeeper Ken Harrelson saw this highly distressed officer carrying an automatic rifle arrived to the top of the stairs. Already something is going wrong in his head. There wasn't a single officer carried off on the stretcher that day. There was another scene that took place in which he describes in the book, not so terribly accurately. He says that he saw a protester who was leaning against the wall. Another police officer had given this protester a bottle of water to wash out his eyes because the protester had been sprayed with pepper spray. The book says that he was screaming obscenity to that protester and yanks the bottle of water out of his hand then throws it in his own words halfway across the rotunda floor. Harry can be seen entering the rotunda. He is not running, but he does inexplicably walk the full length of the floor. He walks over to this lady sitting on a bench, she is wearing red and complete far end of the capitol or the rotunda from where he entered. He is screaming at her and she is doing nothing and immediately an officer has to come over and intervene and actually takes the lady away from Officer Dunn. Then Dunn walks to the middle of the rotunda floor where a protester is sitting in the middle. He's not leaning against the wall. He's sitting on the floor. He has 4 or 5 other police officers around him. He does have a full bottle of water in his hand. And inexplicably, Dunn reaches down and snatches violently, snatches the bottle of water out of his hands, but he doesn't throw it across the floor. He just then ambles across to the other end of the rotunda and walks over and places the bottle on the pedestal of a statue. Then a higher ranking officer can be seen talking to another member of what they call the M4 unit points at Dunn and basically you can see from his hand motions is getting out of here. That officer immediately goes over to Dunn and immediately waves and grabs him and gets him out of there. Once again, he was not in a position where he was de escalating, where he was calm, collected, where he was in control of his own faculties. Officer Dunn as personal training officer who teaches de escalation tactics and procedures was not following the lessons that he himself taught those who was in charge of training. When the January 6th committee was first put together, Nancy Pelosi is famously recorded as saying Speaker 3: And it's also our duty to establish and preserve the narrative of that day. Speaker 2: The stories we have coming out are going to show that there was a concerted effort to manipulate information, manipulate evidence, suppress evidence, and create evidence that does not exist in order to reach those goals of establishing the narrative. Speaker 5: He's been put out as a hero. He received some citizen's award from Joe Biden. MSNBC has treated him like a god. As opposed to Tarik Johnson, what he actually did on January 6th that was heroic, but he's been villainized. Speaker 2: I reached out to Harry. I've been very fair in my series about the Capitol Police. I believe that they were set up that day. I told Harry right from the get go that I believe that he was set up as well. My heart goes out to him and I hope that Harry will eventually see a way to maybe talk to me a little bit further and a little deeper and give me a little bit more inside information.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Why did Nancy Pelosi’s Security Chief, Special Agent David Lazarus, perjure himself on the stand during the Jan 6 Oath Keepers trial?

Video Transcript AI Summary
David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, claimed to witness an encounter between Officer Dunn and Oath Keepers on January 6th. However, CCTV footage showed Lazarus was in a different building at the time. The defense argued that the government withheld evidence and set up American citizens for long sentences. The Capitol Police leadership was more concerned about the story's traction than the false testimony. The case raises questions about who orchestrated the false narrative presented in court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lazarus. Lazarus. Lazarus. Speaker 1: Lazarus. Speaker 0: David Lazarus, special agent, Nancy Pelosi's head of security. Speaker 2: Did Pelosi's security chief himself? Speaker 0: On the very night of the release of this story The Speaker 2: house has voted to house the speaker. Speaker 0: We lost our speaker of the house. The moment McCarthy, his seat was vacated, I lost my ability to release the video. We were given permission to use a single screenshot. Speaker 3: Shot. Therefore, the honorable Mike Johnson, the state of Louisiana, duly elected speaker of the house of representatives. Speaker 0: Of course, now we have a new speaker in place. And we now have permission to release the video. Speaker 4: Another big win for our DOJ prosecutors. The biggest sedition trial in America in 80 years. Speaker 2: The highest profile Speaker 1: justice department has rested its case in the seditious conspiracy trial against Oathkeeper's founder, Stuart Rhodes, and 4 of his associates. Speaker 0: The story of David Lazarus on January 6th is very simple. Speaker 4: Lawyers for Stuart Rhodes and 4 other members of the Oath Keepers on trial have suggested that the group helped officer Harry Dunn. Dunn just took the stand and said flat out, quote, they didn't. Speaker 2: Sentenced to 4 years in prison. Sentenced to 8 and a half years in prison. Speaker 1: Sentenced to 12 years and sentenced to 18 years in prison. Speaker 0: His story that day is he was assisting the evacuation of the senate at the time that the incident between officer Harry Dunn and the Oath Keepers began. Speaker 1: Just outside of the Rectangle, there was Jerry Dunn. He's a capital police officer. He was freaking out. I mean, he was screaming. No. Get the fuck out of here. Of people with it. He was definitely in a position where he could have done some damage. Speaker 0: The oath keepers lined up between him and the more agitated protesters and assisted him in keeping them off of him. Speaker 1: Don rejected the defense's argument that members of the militia protected him. Speaker 0: I don't conflate my story. He had 2 separate FBI interviews which were in conflict with one another. In the first FBI interview, he actually gave a favorable story about his encounter with the 4 oath key. Speaker 1: I stood in front of Harry Dunn for almost 6 minutes. Speaker 0: After he was brought in for a second FBI interview, he changed that story. Speaker 1: He was fighting back insurrectionists across the capital while being called the vilest racist names. Speaker 0: So what they did is they brought in another officer, special agent David Lazarus, to kinda bolster that story and give it more credibility by saying that when he arrived at the top of those stairs, that he saw Dunn standing at the top of the stairs being hassled by these oath keepers. At the time, the Harry Dunn Oath Keepers encounter began, he was not in the same building. Lazarus was just not there. He could not have seen. He could not have witnessed what was taking place because Lazarus was in another senate office building across the street from Constitution Avenue. So we were able to track Lazarus on the capital CCTV cameras. Lazarus can be seen moving away from the capitol building through a lower tunnel at 2 37:59 PM. Lazarus continues moving toward the senate office buildings at 2:41:49 PM. During officer Lazarus' October 31st trial testimony, he stated that he began his return to the capitol building after hearing shots fired over capitol police radio. Speaker 4: They were shot fired. Speaker 0: That occurred at 2:43 PM. Speaker 4: 40:43 hours. Speaker 0: Here, Lazarus can be seen moving back towards the capitol at 2:45 PM. Dunn's encounter with the Oath Keepers began at 2:44 and lasted roughly between 5 and 6 minutes. Here, Lazarus finally emerges from the tunnel back to the senate side of the capitol building at 2:48. Dunn falsely testified that Lazarus was already at the location where he encountered the oath keepers before he arrived. But Lazarus can be seen at the top of the elevator leading up from the tunnel at 2:48 PM on the senate side of the capitol over 4 minutes after Dunn encountered the oath keepers on the house side. I don't complete my story. Lazarus then testified that he saw Dunn in an antagonist that testified that he saw Dunn in an antagonistic conversation with the oath keepers 3 or 4 times. Speaker 4: The Capitol police officer who just took the stand in the oath keepers trial blew a hole in one of the defense's theories. Speaker 2: Starting to restore my faith in the justice department. Finally, they're charging people with the sedition we saw with our own eyes on live TV. Speaker 0: Lazarus can still be seen in the senate side of the building at 2:50 PM. At 252 PM, Lazarus can be seen continuing his progression toward the house side of the capitol. The 4 oath keepers are no longer standing aligned between officer Dunn and those contentious protesters as they had moved into the rotunda and began heading toward the east doors to exit the building. At 2:54 PM, Lazarus continues moving toward the house side of the capital. He is still one level down from where Dunn and the oath keepers encounter had already concluded minutes earlier. At 256 PM, Lazarus is still one floor below and is still not arrived at the staircase where he claimed to have seen Dunn's encounter with the 4 oath keepers. By this time, those oath keepers had already left the rotunda and are about to exit the east doors. Finally, at 256, Lazarus can be seen reaching the bottom of the staircase. At the top of which, he claimed to have witnessed Dunn's very antagonistic interaction with 4 oath keepers 3 or 4 times while rescuing 11 or 12 Pelosi staff from their offices. The problem with that is it just never happened. Speaker 2: He was then shown in court the video clip of 4 oath keepers standing in front of Don. Lazarus was asked, are these the individuals who you observed? Speaker 0: He said, yes. That's the ones that I saw Harry Dunn with, except that he couldn't have because he was in another building a quarter of a mile away. These are videos that were never released to the defense attorneys. Speaker 2: This is our government not getting it wrong. No. This is our government setting American citizens up, withholding evidence that's evidence that's exculpatory, sentencing them to long sentences. This is as bad as it it gets. Speaker 4: It clearly was important to prosecutors. They wanted to set an example. Speaker 0: This should rock the Capitol Police. We received messages from our sources at the DOJ in Washington that they were quote unquote terrified of the story. Additionally, I have a screenshot of an internal email passed between Capitol Police Leadership. They were concerned about the traction that that story was getting. It's something for us to keep an eye on and see if it develops or not. Now this is interesting about the Capitol Police that they're more worried about the traction of their story than they are worried about the lie that their special agent told on the stand in the Oathkeeper's Drive. As we continue the process of peeling back the layers on this particular story, we're going to find evidence of who set this up and who put those 2 officers on the stand because I don't believe for a moment that Harry Dunn and David Lazarus got together in the middle of that staircase that day on January 6th and hatched this story.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

"They set us the f*ck up! That's what they did." -US Capitol Police, Jan 6

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's tweet at 2:24 PM criticized Mike Pence for not protecting the country and demanded truth in certifying election facts. The January 6th committee claimed this tweet incited the Capitol surge. However, officers misused munitions and CS gas, causing chaos. A misfired CS gas canister led to police losing their position, resulting in a collapse of the police line on the west plaza. Frustrated officers felt set up to fail, expressing concerns about not being prepared for the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At 2:24 PM, president Trump tweets, Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our country and our constitution, giving states a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth. This would be a significant tweet to the January 6th committee, for they claimed that it was the motivation for a surge into the capital complex. Speaker 1: Our investigation found that immediately after the president's 2:24 PM tweet, the crowds both outside the capital and inside the capitol surged. Speaker 0: What the January 6th committee failed to mention was that it was officers misusing munitions and CS gas at that same time that led to a surge. Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it on the yeah. DC MPD officer Cowery at the urging of officer Thao, misfires a CS gas canister that eventually forces police to fall back and lose their position. Alright. Before this, I don't have my I got it. Go. As officers on the West Plaza, unequipped with gas masks, struggle breathing, the plume of CS gas can be seen from the overhead camera on the lower right corner of your screen. It blows over the entire area of the west plaza that the police had secured for nearly an hour. Within 3 minutes of the officer CS gas misfire, the police line on the west plaza entirely collapses. At 2:33 PM, a frustrated police officer can be heard venting about being, in his words, set up. I didn't know we are coming up for this. I wanna make sure we all had our masks. I didn't realize how bad I they set us up to fail. They did. There was no way we were winning that.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

"These are the mistakes, intentional or otherwise, that led to Jan 6. We had offered the Capitol Police and Mayor Bowser of Washington DC, thousands of National Guard's men and women - two days before Jan 6 - AND THEY TURNED US DOWN." -Kash Patel

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why the FBI didn't inform cabinet secretaries about potential threats on January 6th. They criticize the lack of security measures at the Capitol and mention offering National Guard support, which was declined. They believe better information sharing could have prevented the events. The speaker emphasizes that protecting the Capitol is a law enforcement responsibility, not a military one, and suggests cooperation between agencies. They imply political reasons for the lack of action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why on January 6th, when it is now publicly been admitted by the FBI that they had information that there could possibly be a situation like that at the United States Capitol, why weren't the cabinet secretaries under president Trump briefed? Why didn't the FBI put a 1,000 uniformed agents around the US Capitol? Where was the fence? Right? These are the lackings of that led to January 6th. These are the mistakes, intentional or otherwise, that led to January 6th. And if you look at the video from January 6th, and they still won't release all of it, an entire side of the Capitol, I believe it's the south side, was totally unmanned. No police officers whatsoever. And that's where the crowd first came in through. And you have to ask yourself what happened on January 6th. Now look, I was chief of staff of the Department of Defense on 6th. We had offered the Capitol Police and mayor Bowser of Washington DC, thousands of national guardsmen and women 2 days before January 6th, and they turned us down. So it could have been prevented. So could it could it have been just not a lot of information sharing happening? I think it was not enough information sharing happening. And I think what people now are starting to realize is that the protecting of the US Capitol on a day like January 6th is a law enforcement function. You cannot have the United States military descend and occupy the area around the United States Capitol. It's literally illegal, but they can assist their law enforcement partners through a request from the mayor or the governor or the Capitol Police. And that's what should happen, and that's what we told them they might want to consider, but they flat out rejected it for political reasons, I believe.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

"We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. GO HOME AND GO HOME IN PEACE." -President Donald J. Trump, Jan 6

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your frustration over the election, but we must maintain peace and order. It's a tough time, but we can't let them win. Please go home peacefully. We appreciate you, but violence is not the answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

The True Timeline of Jan 6 – WATCH EVERY MINUTE!

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Joe Biden and his commie uniparty henchman, like DC U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves, continue to hunt down Jan 6 patriots while allowing 10s of millions of migrants illegally cross our borders.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many were prosecuted for entering the building or engaging in violent conduct on Capitol grounds. Those who entered restricted areas without authorization committed a federal crime. Thousands occupied unauthorized areas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what happened inside of the building. An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those who remained outside the building. We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who enter the building, or those who engage in violent or corrupt conduct on capital grounds. But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization, they had already committed a federal crime. Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be president in in the first place.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to surge to the border to hear asylum seekers. The border is closed and secure, but officials are encountering 10,000 migrants a day. It's not a border crisis, but rather imperialism, climate, and trade crises. The president is working on immigration. There have been over 250,000 migrant encounters since December.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would, in fact, make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border. All those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That's who we are. We're a nation that says if you wanna flee and you're fleeing oppression, you should come. Speaker 1: More than 11,000 migrants are waiting in shelters in Northern Mexico. 38100 in Tijuana, 32100 in Reynosa, 4000 in Matamoros. Many Speaker 2: The border is closed. The border is secure. Speaker 3: This whole this whole thing about the border, we've been to the border. We've been to the border. Speaker 2: You haven't been to the border? Speaker 3: I and I haven't been to Europe, And I will be Speaker 0: As as the president said, he's all about border security. Speaker 2: Tonight, nearly 10,000 migrants a day. That is what federal officials say they are encountering at the US southern border on average escalates in the US officials now warning that the situation is nearing a, quote, breaking point. I wanna be very clear. Our borders are not open. Speaker 3: Because it's not a border crisis. It's an imperialism crisis. It's a climate crisis. It's a trade crisis. This is not a surge. These are children, and they are not insurgents, and we are not being invaded. Which Speaker 4: I will say this. The president has done more to secure the border and to deal with this issue of immigration than anybody else. Speaker 3: Weekend, there were more than 35,000 migrant encounters down at the southern border since the start of December. Encounters have now exceeded 250,000. That's right. Speaker 0: I would, in fact, make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Joe Biden and his commie uniparty henchman throw grandmas who pray for our country in jail while allowing illegal immigrant animals rape and murder American citizens.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My country treats me like a criminal because I support the president they stole from power. Standing up for my country shouldn't make me a criminal. It feels strange to be here, I was here over 3 years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so that that my only country is treating me like a criminal. It's because I believe that my they stole my right rightful president. And just standing up for my country makes me a criminal. And it's not right. It feels so weird to be here. 3 over 3 years ago, I was here.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

It’s all by design – it’s a global agenda – and the uniparty, feds and intel agencies are hard at work to entrench single party rule! H/t @WesternLensman

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democrat open borders plan aims to secure single-party rule by flooding the country with millions of noncitizens, prioritizing their needs over citizens, protecting them from consequences of crimes, counting them in the census for more congressional power, changing voting laws to favor Democrats, and promising benefits for loyalty. This strategy ultimately leads to entrenched single-party rule, all funded by taxpayers. Translation: The Democrat open borders plan is designed to establish single-party control by bringing in millions of noncitizens, giving them priority over citizens, protecting them from legal consequences, including them in the census for more political power, changing voting laws to benefit Democrats, and offering benefits in exchange for loyalty. This strategy results in a single-party rule, all paid for by taxpayers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The democrat open borders plan to entrench single party rule explained in under 2 minutes. 1, flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world. Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual US states so far. 2, prioritize the needs of these millions of noncitizens over the needs of the American citizen with free flights, buses, hotels, meals, and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them. 3, keep them in the country at all costs. Even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape. Attack the language used to describe the criminals as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist. 4, ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets. Codify permanent status and ensure noncooperation with ICE. ICE. 5, count the noncitizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the house of representatives. As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts, a tremendous amount of electoral power. 6, wage a massive heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail in ballots. No signature verification and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud. 7, lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat party. 8, win fealty to the Democrat party. 8, win elections. 9, entrenched single party rule has been achieved. The best part? Your tax dollars are paying for it.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

They want to destroy MAGA. "For too long a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government WHILE THE PEOPLE HAVE BORNE THE COST. Washington flourished BUT THE PEOPLE DID NOT SHARE IN IT'S WEALTH." -President Donald J. Trump

Video Transcript AI Summary
A small group in our nation's capital benefited from government rewards while the people bore the cost. Washington thrived, but the people did not share its wealth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Lara Logan’s Fed-Surrection is a MUST WATCH. @laralogan Fed-Surrection, Part 1 of 3 Why was Ray Epps treated as victim by the same people who condemned almost everyone around him as a threat? https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-5-fed-surrection-part-1/

Fed-Surrection, Part 1 - Truth in Media Why was Ray Epps treated as victim by the same people who condemned almost everyone around him as a threat? truthinmedia.com

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Fed-Surrection, Part 2 of 3 Was Ray Epps the victim of right wing conspiracies and speculation? Or was he being used, like everyone else on January 6th, but for a different purpose? https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-6-fed-surrection-part-2/

Fed-Surrection, Part 2 - Truth in Media Was Ray Epps the victim of right wing conspiracies and speculation? Or was he being used, like everyone else on January 6th, but for a different purpose? truthinmedia.com

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

Fed-Surrection, Part 3 of 3 When Ray Epps urged people to trespass inside the Capitol, he knew it was a crime because he had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass in Pennsylvania from 2015. https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-7-fed-surrection-part-3/

Fed-Surrection, Part 3 - Truth in Media When Ray Epps urged people to trespass inside the Capitol, he knew it was a crime because he had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass in Pennsylvania truthinmedia.com

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

"Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA"

@SoundInvestig - Sound Investigations

BREAKING: CIA Officer/Former FBI Boasts “Can Put Anyone in Jail…Set ’Em Up!” “We Call It a Nudge” FBI “Did What We Wanted” with Alex Jones @RealAlexJones “Took His Money Away” “Chop His Legs Off” Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA FBI Uses “Embellished” News, “Fake Social Media” to “Really Get People Mad”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how they can potentially entrap individuals, including pro-lifers, through manipulation and social media tactics. They mention targeting political commentator Alex Jones and causing financial harm to him. Additionally, they reveal that FBI agents were present undercover at the January 6th Capitol riot. The speaker implies that the FBI's involvement in such events is kept secretive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can kinda Speaker 1: put anyone in jail if you know what to do. Speaker 2: How? I'm sorry about that. Speaker 0: Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Speaker 3: Yeah. We get really close. We call it a nudge. Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge. Speaker 0: Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look Speaker 3: just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow. Speaker 2: That's something we're putting on a fake Speaker 3: social media thing to, like, really get people mad. Speaker 0: Balance Speaker 3: Jones. Yeah. So we were after him. You are? We did what we wanted. Speaker 5: Which was what? Speaker 3: We took his money away. He shot his legs. Speaker 6: Gavin Oglenis is a contracting officer at the CIA. Oglenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2020 2 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors. Speaker 3: I work for, I work for this without I'm not supposed to tell people any job. Speaker 0: I say intelligence, what do you think? CIA? Amazing. Speaker 3: So I deal a lot with, like, different agencies. We're contracting with, like, director of National Intelligence to do stuff. We do Navy, Army, video, really. I just FBI. I used to work for the FBI. So Yeah. Through the FBI app. They're like, here, you used to work there. Oh, I'm permanent. I'm still Yeah. Speaker 0: Good. Well, why do they call contractors? Speaker 3: Because I do the contracts. Uh-huh. I do all the legal contracts. With the bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van. Speaker 6: O'Blennis spoke to an undercover signed investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles. Speaker 0: As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro lifers in jail whenever they want. Yeah. You think that's on the agenda? Speaker 2: We can we can Speaker 3: you can kinda put anyone Speaker 1: in jail if you know what to do. How? Speaker 2: You set them Speaker 3: up. You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. It's a fine line. Speaker 0: Yeah. Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Yeah. We get really close. Not officially? Speaker 3: No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it. Speaker 0: So they can entrap some of these pro lifers into doing things that they don't can do. Speaker 3: Yeah. We call it a nudge. Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge. Speaker 0: Sometimes you Speaker 3: just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens. Right? Speaker 0: And how does that happen? Speaker 2: You put Speaker 0: a post out there or Speaker 3: you have some fake profile say something that triggers that we know is gonna trigger that. Like, we we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about So, like, oh, this is this one. Oh. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to fall. Right? Speaker 0: Like a railing. Like a oh. So when a railing happens, then sometimes the the bureau behind it. Yeah. Sometimes. Speaker 2: Nothing like putting out a Speaker 3: fake social media thing to, like, really get people mad. Mhmm. Post fake news. Yeah. Sometimes it's it's not fake. It's embellished a little bit. Who would Speaker 0: be, like, a big influencer that you're influencer that you're after? You're like, I don't know, like, I don't even know these names. Like, a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson or like oh, I'm sure he's Right. Speaker 3: You always want the biggest and loudest. Like that what Speaker 0: was his name? The one Speaker 3: that said, Sandy Hook didn't happen. Speaker 0: Alex Jones? Speaker 3: Yeah. So we were after him. Speaker 0: You are? Before. Speaker 2: Are you still after Speaker 0: him? Yeah. Why? Speaker 3: Because he's broke. He got found guilty and had to pay, like, a $100,000,000. Speaker 0: So what what are the after? Speaker 3: We're not anymore. Speaker 0: Just to get the money from him? Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 0: Was that court case used? Was that a CFO Speaker 3: case? Speaker 0: That was the agency there? Speaker 3: Well, actually, it was a defamation case. So it's a civil document. Well, we were looking at all of his callers, commenting, oh, I'm like, who's that gonna be this? Right? So even though it's technically not our well, not an agency, definitely, but not the bureau, for instance, yeah, it was not our purview. It's a civil civil matter. Since they got all this access to his stuff and it's there, What can we go find? Speaker 1: And did you find Speaker 3: it? I can't tell you. Speaker 0: Oh, we did. Speaker 3: But so, you know, it's it's just kinda, like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have. Speaker 0: So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening? I thought it Speaker 3: was it wasn't my office, but, I mean, we would've we would've been well aware of what he was doing. And the Speaker 0: goal with him was what? Speaker 3: Just to bankrupt him? Pretty much. And we let the families do it. Oh my god. And what? We let the families do it. Were they encouraged to do that by the bureau, like a nudge? We don't encourage people, but, like, we we just say there's no federal statute being broken. But you do have the option for a civil or a civil case. It's a pretty good case. Nice. In our opinion. Speaker 0: So oh, that makes so much sense. I have a cousin who's a lawyer. So that's a lot of these cases. They're they're kind of encouraged by the FBI. Speaker 3: Yeah. Like, there's something federally federal law we can do. Let's simply, we'll add them that way. I I chopped this place, and they did. So the FBI was happy. We didn't care. We were not Speaker 0: home. Basically, the citizens did your job? Yeah. Wow. So you can encourage a civil lawsuit? Speaker 3: Very encouraged. Educated. What can you do with Speaker 0: people like Alex Jones now? Is he still out there? Good. He's still chirping. Speaker 3: He can chirp? You still watching? Yeah. Why? I said He did what we wanted. Speaker 5: Which was what? Speaker 3: We took his money away. We shut him out for a while. You're never gonna shut him up for him. Speaker 0: How well, unless you put him in prison. Speaker 2: Yeah. I was going to Speaker 3: Again, he didn't Being ignorant is not a crime, though. It's just It is. I mean, what Speaker 0: you could bring a nun Speaker 3: if he did inside a riot like Cheeto. Speaker 1: He didn't furnish people to go Speaker 3: shoot me. He didn't. Speaker 6: Additionally, O'Blennis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover. While O'Blennis notes that they were not involved in violence, this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance. Speaker 0: I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at j 6. Speaker 3: There are. There always are when there's a big protest in DC just in case it gets out of here. Speaker 0: They but there Speaker 3: wasn't wasn't enough to turn that tight. I mean, I'm talking to maybe have a 20. You needed a 1,000 to get rid of that that crap. Speaker 0: So they had, like oh, that was on just 20? Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 3: Just to go through and see what I can hear, you know, that kind of thing. Wow. Speaker 0: That's yeah. Definitely. They need a 1,000 lease. Wow. That's also Speaker 3: Capitol Police are sickly. They're in charge. So does that They didn't have more on hand? I don't know. Speaker 0: The bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd. Mhmm. Speaker 3: Because that would be overstepping their bounds. Speaker 2: A little Speaker 0: bit. Do people know that? Why? Do people know that the bureau was in the crowd? Speaker 3: Nope. You probably never will. Speaker 0: Do you know agents that were there? Speaker 3: Mhmm. Really? Speaker 0: They work Speaker 3: for the agency now.

@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸

🚨 DC National Guard whistleblowers to say they WERE ready to be deployed on January 6 on Trump's orders hours but were held back by the Pentagon in bombshell testimony contradicting Capitol riot committee's story https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13293449/DC-National-Guard-whistleblowers-say-ready-deployed-January-6-Trumps-orders-hours-held-Pentagon-bombshell-testimony-contradicting-Capitol-riot-committees-story.html

DC National Guard whistleblowers to speak at hearing on Jan 6 panel Whistleblowers from the D.C. National Guard will tell Congress Trump did want them deployed during Capitol riot and the Army delayed telling them to mobilize in a bombshell hearing next week. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - December 13, 2024 at 12:55 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Today the media decided to tell us what we have known for 4 years. There were at least 26 confidential sources in the crowd on J6 who went into the Capitol, 3 of whom the FBI asked to attend. FBI informants entered the Capitol on J6. It was all a set up to jail Trump supporters.

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 2:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights from a January 6th witness who described how Capitol Police facilitated the crowd's entry into the Capitol. The witness noted a "scaffold guy" with a bullhorn encouraging people to move closer to the building, suggesting he was directing the crowd intentionally. As more people gathered, Capitol Police began using rubber bullets to push them inside. This orchestrated approach led me to believe that the events were highly organized and planned, raising questions about the involvement of federal agents.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 January 6th Witness who was there early in the crowd reveals how Capitol Police worked to get protesters inside the US Capitol Brian Miller exposes there was a “scaffold guy” at the very top of the building near the podium with a blow horn “kept telling everybody to come on up — wanted to push everybody to try and get inside the building — try and push them to get in” Everyone came up and then Capitol police started shooting everyone with rubber bullets herding everyone inside “Scaffold guy” was definitely A FED, with access to an area he shouldn’t have been able to get to access and he was directing everyone right where Capitol police needed them This was highly organized and PLANNED FEDsurrection

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brian and I were at the Capitol on January 6th. After the crowd gathered, Brian stayed with other veterans near the podium. He witnessed police using tear gas and rubber bullets, which shocked him. A man on the scaffolding urged people to push forward and enter the building. Brian remained on the ground, recording the events, while others attempted to break in. He saw some individuals vandalizing property, including a woman trying to break a window, which he condemned. Despite the chaos, he focused on documenting the moment, reflecting on the significance of being there. Both of us faced criticism upon returning home, but we felt it was an important experience. Now, as we prepare for President Trump's inauguration, we reminisce about that day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here with Brian Miller and he was at January 6th. We went on to the capitol in the private jet. Okay. So Brian was with me and Brian, we went back to the hotel. Okay, when the when the crowd went down there. So we were all down by the Capitol before the whole crowd got there. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: And so here's what Brian saw. Okay? So I want you to tell us Speaker 1: Yeah. So after it if after y'all took off and I stayed there by myself, then I was there with a bunch of other veterans, and so we went up to where the the the the podium is at. But then we were there for quite a while, and then all of a sudden, whenever the police started coming over and, eventually, they started shooting tear gas and rubber bullets, and people were getting hurt in their faces and bleeding. And and it was pretty cold that that day too, but it was crazy. Speaker 0: Okay. Wait. So I remember after this, I was just kinda shook up after my experience. He kept saying they shot everybody with these bullets. They he kept repeating that, and I was like, I could it really couldn't register with me. Yeah. So but now it's kinda more and more registering. So I was asking about, like, the scaffold guy, that guy who was standing up there. What was he telling people to do? Speaker 1: It was fun and it was funny because the guy who went all the way up to the very top of the, of that scaffolding. And because there's there's the rafters that they were building, and then there's the one that's right in the middle, right near the podium where he was sitting right on the very top of the bullhorn telling everybody, get over here. Just be a patriot and Go in there. Here and push push the front. And it was just get up here. Get up here. Speaker 0: And then they were getting shot with bullets? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: So they so he told them to go up there. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Where were you standing to see all of this? Speaker 1: I was right there on the top, right near Speaker 0: The scaffold guy? Speaker 1: Yeah. I was right near I was right in between the scaffolding and right near the podium. Speaker 0: So he was telling everyone, get up here. Did you tell him to go in? Speaker 1: Everybody that was down on the ground kept telling everybody to come on up because they wanted to push everybody to try and get inside the building. Speaker 0: Okay. They were rounding them up and having a go. Speaker 1: And everybody tried pushing to get in. Yeah. Speaker 0: And then at that same time, he started shooting they started shooting at him. After a Speaker 1: while, they start yeah. Then they'd they had that broadcast. I don't know if you remember him that broadcasting. Okay. We're gonna have a curfew that nobody anybody was gonna be there's gonna be arrested. And so but this all happened just just before that happened. Speaker 0: So when you saw them starting to shoot the people with the bullets, what were you thinking? Speaker 1: I couldn't believe it. I mean, this is when I was posting everything on Facebook and just go look at what's going on here. I mean, this is like you're be you're one of those places where you just say, I gotta get all this like a reporter. Speaker 0: But you couldn't believe it that they Speaker 1: were doing that. Speaker 0: I mean, would it were you like, why are they shooting this into the crowd? The crowd is just Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. It was Speaker 0: but it Speaker 1: was like everybody that was in the front because they were trying because I think that they were worried that they were but that nobody had anything. Nobody had any swords or guns or anything. Speaker 0: But my question is, did you why were you why'd you keep saying, they're shooting them with bullets. Speaker 1: Yeah. Because you could see them shooting them. Because you Speaker 0: think, why did they do that to them? Or did you think, I understand why they're doing it? Because the way you put it to me, it was almost like it was like, why Speaker 1: I just couldn't believe they I just couldn't believe they did it. I mean, they they shouldn't have done it anyways because but, you know, within the police officers got it with the crowd Speaker 0: But what made you say you didn't think that they should've done it? What made you feel like they shouldn't have done it? Because the people were just standing there? Speaker 1: Well, they we nobody had even as a as a veteran, I didn't I didn't have a weapon on me. None of us had weapons, so they shouldn't have done anything. So Speaker 0: Okay. So that because so that really felt offensive to you Of course. To see them just shooting off into a crowd. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: Because a lot of people have had that same complaint. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So okay. You saw them shooting. You were by the scaffolding guy. Were you up high on the scaffolding? No. Speaker 1: I didn't go up in the scaffolding. I was there on the ground level. So but I was right near the podium in between where the scaffolding is, where they were building all the places where people can sit. Speaker 0: Okay. But he was telling everybody to go in. Why didn't or he was telling everybody to get up to the front. Why didn't you go? Speaker 1: Well, because I just wanted to video it. I don't wanna go inside. Speaker 0: You knew you didn't wanna go inside? Speaker 1: I was gonna stay outside the whole time. So Okay. Yeah. But I saw people trying to destroy stuff or whatever, and they were just pushing to get in. I mean, I had a good view of everyone trying to get inside that doorway. You know, like, where that that one cop got, like, stuck in the, in the deal. I don't know if there's a there's a lot of information about that. Speaker 0: Supposed to be my bodyguard, and here he was just watching. Just watch and I was like, do do do do do do do. Let's just go Speaker 1: right in there. Well and then, of course, I didn't even know that they were on the other side of the building where the stairway was, where the rotunda is. I'm on the other side of the building. So you were on Speaker 0: the opposite side of the entry rotunda? Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay. Speaker 0: Well, I don't know. I don't know if it's west side. Speaker 1: Where you guys where you guys were at, y'all were where the stairway is to go up onto the building. Right. I was on the other side where they have the inauguration. Speaker 0: Oh, okay. So I Speaker 1: was all the way on the other side of the building. So I could see everything that was going on where they're building the scaffolding, and then that's where they have where the president's right there doing his inauguration. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: So I was on that side. So you were on the complete other side. Speaker 0: Yeah. I was in the front or near Yeah. You're in the front. I was on the back. The Pennsylvania Avenue. West. I don't know. We don't know. Speaker 1: We're not we're not not Speaker 0: sure y'all will probably know. People that are listening to this will probably know. Do you know where the tunnel was? Speaker 1: Yeah. The tunnel was on my side. Speaker 0: So the tunnel is where all the stuff went down. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Okay. That's Speaker 1: whenever they were hee ho. Hee ho. Speaker 0: They were saying hee ho. Yeah. He saw the saw the He watched Speaker 1: wow. That was amazing. It was crazy. Speaker 0: Well, I got him the trip there. Speaker 1: Yeah. Hey. We had we had a good time. Hey. What what hey. But all the Liberals, of course, wanna close all the bars, and they didn't wanna have anything to do with us. So but they what they would have thought about it. Hey. We would've given them a lot of money if they would have stayed open. Speaker 0: Okay. So you saw the HEB ho in the tunnel. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: You did you see anybody damage property? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And what did you think about that? Speaker 1: No. That that was bad. Speaker 0: I mean, who do Speaker 1: you think that I even thought there was a woman that went up to one of the windows, and she kept bashing the windows. And then we were yelling, stop it. Stop it. And this one guy pulled her off Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And to do it. And then she went back up there to go and try and damage it again or just like some of these people are crazy. Speaker 0: What does she look like? Speaker 1: I don't remember. That was 2 years ago. Speaker 0: One of the things is is that I didn't do any of that. Nope. If I had to seen any of that, I would've gotten it present for a long time. That's even get arrested. Speaker 1: Anybody that sees her next to that one window that was broken look. And that was broken even before she got there. So Speaker 0: Yeah. They no. They were breaking Yeah. These weird people that were in masks and helmets Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: And really prepared. Who knows if they were busting? Who knows? I don't know. Yeah. But granted, you know, it wasn't my shining hour, but it didn't happen. Okay. Back to Speaker 1: But it's always memorable though. Speaker 0: You'll never forget that. So, okay. So you saw the people breaking the window. You don't remember what the person was wearing that broke the window. Speaker 1: I probably have pictures and everything because I remember taking pictures of video. Speaker 0: I'm sure they have video. There's a lot of video that we still have not seen that we wanna see, but there was supposedly, you know, people in the crowd that and I was just looking at his pictures, and I saw, like, Patriot Front in there. And I'm like, oh my god. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: I know those people. So Speaker 1: And just remember, I was in the Navy, so I was a photographer and, and doing videos and everything back then. So for me, as a as as one of those opportunities for our nation, this is where I wanted to video and take pictures of everything because it's one of those moments you'll never forget. I mean, how many times do you have somebody from Texas that's gonna go to DC for a president to go see something like it doesn't happen. Speaker 0: Right. Well, the thing is is he didn't get arrested. The FBI just came to see him, and he saw all that all that violence, but he got nothing. Although there's 2 more days, they're probably still making arrests. Speaker 1: Well, yeah. I mean, trust me. That that Speaker 0: You better watch out. Speaker 1: I got more criticism online than anybody else. Trust me. I even with my sexy boys. So Speaker 0: So, yeah, we we both received a lot of flack, in the community when we got back Yep. For what we endured and went through. And Speaker 1: And both of us and both of us in the community are pretty well known. Yeah. And and, you know, for for people to go and and dog us the way they did, I mean, it was uncalled for and, you know, pretty unpatriotic too. So Speaker 0: Yeah. We're here right now. He has a a leg. Yeah. Speaker 1: I Speaker 0: got a gun to the hospital today. Speaker 1: Bad car accident, but I'm happy that my favorite person in the whole world came over to see me. Speaker 0: Aw. Thank you, Brian. You're so sweet. So, yeah, here we are just talking about j 6, getting ready to see president Trump inaugurated in 45 hours. Speaker 1: Wait. Couple days. Speaker 0: 2 days. Talk to you soon. Have a Speaker 1: good one.
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

J6 wasn’t a protest—it was a setup. The government has admitted its involvement. They used FBI provocateurs, improper security, and had a pre-planned narrative ready. This was America’s Reichstag Fire—used to justify a crackdown on conservatives. https://t.co/FR9EpP8DvK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's involvement in January 6th is undeniable, with proven entrapment tactics. To put it simply, January 6th was our American Reichstag fire moment. Anyone familiar with the history of the Nazi campaign in Germany understands the implications of that statement. January 6th served the purposes of a deeply corrupt Biden regime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government has admitted and proved for the whole world to see without dispute that they were involved. They had entrapment elements in place. And so, like I said, you can generally see January 6 for what it is. If you wanna just distill it down in a single sentence, January 6 was our American Reichstag fire moment. And any student of history that generally understands the Nazi campaign in Germany knows what that means. That's right. But that is what January 6 was functioning, as for a very, very corrupt Biden regime.
Saved - November 13, 2025 at 8:12 AM

@RealRyanNichols - Ryan Nichols Sr.

If a Capitol Police Officer planted pipe bombs on January 6th, don’t you think there were other bad actors at play? Let me show you a few examples of police officer behavior that stood out on January 6th.. This is a much larger series that I’m about to dive into.. It’s past time..

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by instructing viewers to watch the video in a specific orientation to properly see the content, promising that they will show some footage from January 6 that has not been seen before. They claim that the January 6 pipe bomber was a Capitol Police officer named Shawnee Kirkhoff, and that Kirkhoff was shooting pepper balls at protesters and shot people through the mouth, injuring other protesters as well. The speaker says they will show clips of Capitol Police and MPD (DC Metropolitan Police) officers assaulting people in the crowd, including the speaker themselves, with pepper spray, batons, sticks, and other means. The speaker emphasizes that protesters are heard screaming and begging for the actions to stop. They point out that other MPD and Capitol Police officers are seen waving at these rogue officers who are beating and inciting the crowd, suggesting these could be other CIA agents or other Shawnee Kirkhoff-type plant bombers. These are presented as questions that, according to the speaker, deserve to be asked. A video is to be shown as a snippet of many more to come. The speaker mentions an intention to release a video covering the time frame from 03:55 PM to 04:18 PM, but states that this plan has changed. Instead, they will release the full video in about a week or two and will publish additional small snippets over the next couple of days. The speaker frames this as a sequence of forthcoming releases rather than a single upload. Toward the end, there are brief on-screen audio moments: “Easy on the spray. Stop the spray.” followed by lines that appear to be crowd or mic dialogue, including “Quit fucking o c, miss Ray. Alright. Come on.” These lines serve as short, real-time reactions or commands during the events being referenced. Overall, the speaker asserts that new, previously unseen footage from January 6 will reveal interactions between law enforcement officers and protesters, including alleged misconduct by an identified officer, and raises provocative questions about possible ties to broader covert activity, promising ongoing releases of further clips in the near future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. If you're watching this video, turn it, turn it, turn it. Alright. You need to be watching this video like this. And the reason being is I'm gonna show some snippets. And the way that I'm gonna show them, you just have to be watching the video like this in order to see it correctly. Now, what I wanna show you is some things that some footage from January 6 that you've never seen before. And it the reason I'm showing this is because we know that the January 6 pipe bomber was a capital police officer, Shawnee Kirkhoff. We also know that Shawnee Kirkhoff was shooting pepper balls on January 6 at protesters and shot people through the mouth and, hurt other protesters as well. Now I'm gonna show you some clips of Capitol Police and MPD officers assaulting people in the crowd, including myself assaulting me with pepper spray, with batons and sticks, and other protesters as well. You're gonna hear protesters that are screaming, asking, begging, please stop. You're gonna see this is what I want you to notice, I want you to see the other MPD, DC Metropolitan Police Officers and Capitol Police Officers waving at these rogue officers that are beating and inciting the crowd. Could these be other CIA agents? Could these be other Shawnee Kirkhoff type plant bomber or pipe bomber types? These are questions that need to be asked and they deserve to be asked. So I'm gonna show you the video and this is a snippet of many more videos to come. I was gonna release a video that's 03:55PM to 04:18PM. I'm not gonna do that. I'm gonna release the full thing in about a week or two, but I'm gonna release some small snippets over the next couple of days. And these are a couple of those snippets and these are very few of a lot that I have coming. Easy on the spray. Stop the spray. That's great. Coming back. Yeah. Quit fucking o c, miss Ray. Alright. Come on.
Saved - February 13, 2026 at 3:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reference a memo claiming the FBI planned for January 6th months in advance, including embedding informants and mass arrests of conservatives, and that a Boston tabletop exercise occurred in Aug 2020. Kash Patel turned the memos over to Congress at Chairman Loudermilk’s request. The memos allegedly show the FBI anticipated a contested election and proposed strategies—informants in volatile groups and mass prosecutions—to hurt conservatives, not liberals.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 New memo reveals the FBI planned for January 6th MONTHS IN ADVANCE They planned to plant informants in this crowd and PLANNED MASS ARRESTS OF CONSERVATIVES They literally KNEW it would be rigged because they only planned arrests for conservatives, not liberals “They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August of 2020, five months before January 6th occurred.” “The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Loudermilk. Who's in charge of the J6 investigation now in the House, showed that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election — they even devised very specific strategies. -One of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur - The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes, exactly what the FBI did after January 6th. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out — The FBI, knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion outlines that a year before January 6, the FBI conducted a planning exercise and had specific plans for the event. Speaker 1 states there was a tabletop exercise run in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6. The memos that Kash Patel turned over to Congress, recently provided at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging or contested election, with both sides agitated and likely to escalate to violence. The memos also reveal that the FBI devised specific strategies, including embedding informants inside groups where political violence or agitation might occur. According to Speaker 1, the FBI had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6, and recommended mass prosecutions, even for the most minor crimes—described as exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Speaker 1 emphasizes two major points about the strategy: first, that the strategy was conceived months in advance and was carried out; second, that it represented a double standard because it differed from how political violence at BLM protests and far-left actions in 2020 were handled. The claim is that informants were embedded in both left- and right-wing groups, including Antifa and right-wing groups, and that intelligence suggested a bad episode would occur. They allege that, according to Chairman Barry Lautemux, warnings from informants were strong, but Capitol stakeholders in Washington, DC, did not receive those warnings or pass them along. This, they argue, shows two failed examples of the FBI under the Chris Ray era, with foreknowledge of events but actions that hurt conservatives while not alerting liberals or those who could have prevented violence. The documents are presented as now public, described as stunning by the speakers. Regarding whether there was any briefing to higher-level officials, Speaker 0 asks if there is evidence that Bill Barr, Chris Ray, or staff at the White House were briefed after the tabletop exercise and plan development. Speaker 1 responds that there is no indication of briefing the attorney general or other senior officials. There is no documentation showing that Barr, the Homeland Security Department, the Capitol Police, or the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police were alerted. The speaker notes that this suggests an insular FBI operation, drawing a comparison to pre-nine-eleven dynamics, implying systemic issues within the FBI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me get this correct. A year before January 6, the FBI knew there might be some consternation about the election given everything given the Democrats already war gaming it. They thought this thing through, and they actually had plans specifically for January 6, sir? Speaker 1: Yeah, they did. They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6 occurred. The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, who's in charge of the J-six investigation now in the House, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election, that both sides appeared to be agitated and likely would, it could likely carry out that agitation to the point of violence. And they even devised very specific strategies. And one of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur. That is something that the FBI did. We had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6. The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes. Exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out. It's not the strategy they use for the political violence at BLM and the far left conducted all throughout the 2020. So a very clear double standard. The second thing is they did embed informants in a lot of groups, including left and right groups, Antifa and right wing groups. And they got lots of intelligence suggesting a bad episode would occur. We now know from Chairman Barry Lautemux that that while those warnings were very strong from the informants, the preparations of the warnings from the FBI to the brethren of the Capitol in Washington DC did not exist. They didn't pass on the warnings from the informants. So two failed examples of the Chris era of the FBI. Knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals and not warning the people who could actually prevent the violence from occurring. That is the legacy of the Chris Ray FBI. It's what we now have on open. These documents are now out there for everybody to see. Pretty stunning, though maybe not so stunning given what we've learned about the FBI. Speaker 0: Is there any part of this that shows that they briefed that Bill Barr and Chris Ray briefed the president of The United States or briefed his staff or briefed senior people at the White House after the tabletop exercise and after they came up with a plan of how to get informants, is there any evidence at all that people that should have known about this were actually informed about it? Speaker 1: No, it doesn't look like the attorney general knew Bill Barr or the brass, at least not as of now. There's no documentation showing that. There's no mention of it in the documents even suggesting that we alert the Attorney General or the Homeland Security Department or the Capitol Police or the Washington DC Metropolitan Police. So it looks like the insular sort of pillared FBI existed again. These are the same diseases that affected the FBI before nineeleven and you're starting to see the same thing.
Saved - February 4, 2023 at 5:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6, 2021, a group of Trump supporters gathered in Washington DC to protest the election results. The FBI had infiltrated the Proud Boys and had agents embedded in the crowd. The media portrayed the protesters as insurrectionists, but evidence suggests that Antifa members were involved in the chaos. Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed protester, was shot and killed by Capitol police. The FBI's actions were aimed at discrediting Trump and his supporters, and preventing their concerns about election integrity from being heard.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

𝐓𝐇𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃: Proof That January 6, 2021 Was The Most Dangerous Insurrection In American History.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

20 FBI and ATF join J6th. The FBI and the Department of Injustice continue to politically persecute and frighten American citizens A whistleblower revealed a plethora of documents and text messages, some labeled "Highly Sensitive," to the Gateway Pundit. https://www.dropbox.com/s/mdcr198jrp4t320/FED%20attached%20to%20Proud%20Boys.pdf?dl=0

FED attached to Proud Boys.pdf Dropbox is a free service that lets you bring your photos, docs, and videos anywhere and share them easily. Never email yourself a file again! dropbox.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The informant further testifies to the FBI that Proud Boys intended to travel to Washington DC to risk their own safety to shield normal Trump Supporters from Antifa violence so MAGA people could enjoy the day and "go back to their hotels safely"

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Throughout the day, the informant sent SMS to his handlers. The whistleblower provided us with text message correspondence between the informant on January 6th, such as the one below. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217.84.0.pdf

Motion to dismiss count(s) – #84 in United States v. RHODES, III (D.D.C., 1:22-cr-00015) – CourtListener.com MOTION to Dismiss Count 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Indictment by THOMAS EDWARD CALDWELL. (Fischer, David) (Entered: 04/12/2022) courtlistener.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The photographs and videos he gave, together with names, addresses, and phone numbers, led to these people being searched and detained by the FBI. See the photos labelled "Highly Sensitive" submitted to the FBI and that the whistleblower shared HERE. https://www.dropbox.com/sh/6my1w5w3uu0gt72/AADzN1WqfpYpO5v2ni8rJP20a?dl=0&preview=IMAGES+OF+DEFENDANTS.pdf

Dropbox - Error Dropbox is a free service that lets you bring your photos, docs, and videos anywhere and share them easily. Never email yourself a file again! dropbox.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

When an event like J6 gains the public's attention, someone has to be the enemy, the FBI knew this. If the people fighting for election integrity are bad who is good? Full audio, images, and transcript below: CC: @GOP https://www.scribd.com/document/582084718/Highly-Sensitive-DOJ-Jan-6-Documents-Leaked-to-The-Gateway-Pundit-FBI-Confidential-Human-Source-INFILTRATED-Proud-Boys-Ran-FBI-Operation-on-J-6-R

Highly Sensitive DOJ Jan 6. Documents Leaked To The Gateway Pundit - FBI Confidential Human Source INFILTRATED Proud Boys, Ran FBI Operation On J-6, Reported They Were INNOCENT! | PDF | Crime & Violence | Law Enforcement Highly Sensitive DOJ Jan 6. Documents Leaked to The Gateway Pundit – FBI Confidential Human Source INFILTRATED Proud Boys, Ran FBI Operation on J-6, Reported They Were INNOCENT! - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Highly Sensitive DOJ Jan 6. Documents Leaked to The Gateway Pundit – FBI Confidential Human Source INFILTRATED Proud Boys, Ran FBI Operation on J-6, Reported They Were INNOCENT! scribd.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The media pushed the propaganda that Trump and his supporters were asking everyone to riot. The J6 committee was caught doctoring Trump's speech and removed "peacefully and patriotically" from it. Why would they hide this?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Trump actually vanished before his voters began walking towards the Capitol, he was "escorted" by his secret service because they claim there were reports that indicated he was in danger, the media continued to paint a false picture of Trump, but why? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/29/secret-service-agent-testify-trump-wheel-jan-6

Secret Service agent reportedly willing to testify Trump did not lunge at him Row comes after ex-White House aide’s explosive testimony that portrayed a violent and unhinged Trump on day of Capitol attack theguardian.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Alex Jones was also accused of inciting violence, Did you know that "2000 Mules" has yet to be debunked? Why would the FBI and DOJ hide evidence from the public? Why would they want to frame MAGA voters?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

We have proof that prosecutors and the FBI hid footage, so I have attached every Parler file from J6th, The people should always have the ability to judge for themselves. https://projects.propublica.org/parler-capitol-videos/ when the truth is hidden from the public a lie can take it's place

What Parler Saw During the Attack on the Capitol ProPublica sifted through thousands of videos taken by Parler users to create an immersive, first-person view of the Capitol riot as experienced by those who were there. projects.propublica.org

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

If this looks like an insurrection to you?, please research the 1987–1989 JVP insurrection. - Federal court filings reveal over 20 FBI agents were embedded in the #January6 crowd https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217/gov.uscourts.dcd.239217.84.0.pdf CC:@kevinomccarthy CC:@SpeakerMcCarthy

Motion to dismiss count(s) – #84 in United States v. RHODES, III (D.D.C., 1:22-cr-00015) – CourtListener.com MOTION to Dismiss Count 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Indictment by THOMAS EDWARD CALDWELL. (Fischer, David) (Entered: 04/12/2022) courtlistener.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The only people that died during this was MAGA voters like Ashli Babbitt who was shot unarmed by Capitol police. It is worth noting that there appears to be video evidence that suggests Babbitt struck the officer first, if true, this could explain the lack of prosecution.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

This new Trumpian Empire's vanguard lacked weaponry, siege equipment, food and water for a long occupation, and any firm plan. What did they possess? A man in warpaint who claimed to be a shaman. (Who I can confirm from close sources is a freedom-loving patriot not FBI)

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

With a distraction this large, it wouldn't be insane to question the authenticity of election integrity. After conservatives were labeled as insurrectionists, all of their views and concerns became irrelevant. Anyone who would hold them accountable was identified as a terrorist.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Why would the FBI go through all of this work to discredit Trump? Evidence suggests it was to make America forget why they came. When Trump won his 2016 election millions of tax dollars were spent when the DNC accused him of "Russian collusion" https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/cyber/russian-interference-in-2016-u-s-elections

RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN 2016 U.S. ELECTIONS | Federal Bureau of Investigation CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT AN OFFENSE AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; FALSE REGISTRATION OF A DOMAIN NAME; AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT; CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MONEY LAUNDERING fbi.gov

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The fact that the media and the FBI prevented conservatives from being able to voice the same concerns is very concerning in itself. If we live in a nation where only one voice is able to be concerned is it still free? Why did MAGA voters go to D.C.?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

An army of lawyers descended, some with poorly written briefs, others with very convincing witnesses. Postal workers, a UPS driver, poll workers, & others began sharing damning stories about blatant fraud. Each of these cases was slowly, but soundly rejected, denied, or dismissed

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Most importantly, not on merit, but on standing. That is, the evidence was never judged; only the method was. This ensured that Trump's followers' issues were never examined, aired, or scrutinized in the open while his opponents might insult Trump supporters for their losses

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

He did a huge disservice by never putting these claims to rest. Those who dared to question what they saw were vilified as conspiracy theorists and morons at best and traitors and terrorists at worst.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The final straw for these people would be a special election in Georgia to determine Senate control. People went to bed expecting the Republicans would retain those two seats, leaving the new president with a divided Congress.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

It is now clear that the protests became confrontational during the president's speech, calling the president's claim that he led them into question. What is true is that some people entered the legislative building with the help of the Capitol Police.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Before protesters were led in, we can see the first people to enter the Capitol were wearing full tactical gear, which also supports the evidence that this was indeed an organized event, even though the FBI has been backtracking on that statement about conservatives lately.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Confirmed Antifa Member John Sullivan can be seen in the same gear days while publicly organizing Antifa's plans before J6 and during the protest, we can see him being led into the Capitol with CNN.

The Parody of Many Dild0s on Twitter “@dom_lucre What the media said about John Sullivan was completely false too. Here are videos of him telling his supporters what to wear on that day and of him saying "we did this shit" and "I got a knife". Same voice in both videos. He's also with BLM.” twitter.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

While protesters were inside the Capitol, members of Antifa were seen and reported starting majority of the chaos that was being reported, it appears these reports fell on death ears as there were no reports of Antifa having any connection to J6th.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Anyone who paid attention to Joe Biden leading up to the election knew full well that this was an absurd proposition, yet when all newscasters said it long enough, it became the reality. So, the narrative was set. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/6/trump-coverage-still-90-negative-says-new-study/

Trump coverage still 90% negative, says new study It has been a pattern since President Trump was inaugurated well over a year ago. Coverage of the White House on the "Big Three" broadcast networks -- ABC, CBS and NBC -- remains 91 percent negative, according to a new study by the Media Research Center, which has been tracking the phenomenon since Mr. Trump took office. washingtontimes.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Apologies, this clip was supposed to go on this TWEET.

View Full Interactive Feed