reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - March 4, 2024 at 4:51 AM

@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong

Please tell me she got court martialed for this. https://t.co/FOnqAiZ0Rj

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the military is deployed in the US, their weapons aren't just aimed at other countries, but at you. If you don't follow orders to stay indoors, you're seen as the enemy. This could lead to martial law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understand that if active duty military actually get deployed within the United States, that weapon is not just pointed at other people, other countries. It's pointed at you. If you do not get in your house when I tell you to, you become the enemy. Martial law.
Saved - August 14, 2023 at 12:59 AM

@bud_cann - ༒☬ 𝔹𝕦𝕕 ☬༒

Imagine being on his staff when he starts to lie, imagine how they must cringe, imagine how much they disrespect and hate him… he’s been to Iraq and Afghanistan 7 times, the last time was in 2011.

Saved - October 9, 2023 at 2:19 AM

@unusual_whales - unusual_whales

Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks lost composure when pressed about government fraud, waste, and abuse this year:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 discusses the importance of being able to pass an audit in the United States military. Speaker 0 questions whether this speaks to the larger issue of corruption in journalism. Speaker 1 explains that an audit is simply a way to determine what was delivered and does not necessarily indicate waste or fraud. Speaker 0 argues that if money cannot be accounted for, it is wasteful. They also mention food insecurity on military bases and the large military budget compared to other departments. Speaker 1 addresses these concerns by stating that funds are being allocated to address food insecurity and increase pay and benefits for service members and their families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you feel like these are unfair questions of of somebody within a department of that size and scope? Speaker 1: I think you're, I think you have an particular thing you really want to talk about and you're asking me other questions, but I don't think it's unfair to ask me about the audit. It's absolutely the case of the United States military should be able to pass on it, and we've got to be on that pathway to get there. Speaker 0: But don't you think that that does speak to the larger point that we're trying to get at, which is good journalism uncovers corruption. And Speaker 1: Okay. I mean, good journalism doesn't cover corruption, but I'm not sure these two things are linked. An audit is Speaker 0: not what they are. Speaker 1: Okay. So you need to explain to me, do you understand what an audit does and the degree to which it is linked to the question that you're asking? Speaker 0: I believe so. Speaker 1: Okay. Go ahead. Give me Speaker 0: give me your give me Speaker 1: give me your explanation. Speaker 0: I know. I I don't mind learning. So what I would suggest is that, the audit that they have in, in the military doesn't really look at whether or not there's efficacy. It's just whether they got delivered the thing that they ordered. And Speaker 1: That is that is any audit. That is any audit. That is true. Speaker 0: But generally, those audits aren't $400,000,000,000 for Raytheon and $1,700,000,000,000 for a plane that doesn't seem to be doing. Like, there is a lot of waste fraud and abuse within assist. Speaker 1: Audits and waste fraud and abuse are not the same thing. So let's, decompose these Speaker 0: Please educate me on Sure. Speaker 1: So An audit is exactly what you just described, which is do I know what was delivered to which place? Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: The ability to pass an audit or the fact that the DOD has not passed an audit is not suggestive of waste fraud and abuse. That is completely false right there. So now it's a question. It's suggested that we can't, we don't have an accurate inventory that we can pull up of what we have, where. That is not the same as saying, we can't do that because waste fraud and abuse has occurred. Speaker 0: So in my world? That's waste. Speaker 1: How is that waste? Speaker 0: If I give you $1,000,000,000 and you can't tell me what happened to it, that to me is wasteful. That, that means you are not responsible. But if you can't tell me where it went, then what am I supposed to think And when there has been reporting, I mean, this is not look, I'm not I'm not saying this is on you and that you caused this But I think it's a tough argument to make that Speaker 1: cost it. Speaker 0: And an $850,000,000,000 budget to an organization that can't pass an audit and tell you where that money went. Like, I think most people would consider that somewhere in the realm of waste fraud or abuse because they would wonder why that money isn't well accounted for. And especially when they see food insecurity on military bases, and they see Do you wanna Speaker 1: talk about that? Because that's a good we should be talking. I mean, if I understand where where where you're trying to go other than the dollars, which really bother you. Speaker 0: I think it doesn't really bother me. I think all connected. Okay. Speaker 1: I Speaker 0: think when I Tell me Speaker 1: that story. Tell tell me how you're Speaker 0: thinking about that. When I see, a state department get a certain amount of money and a military budget be ten times that. And I see a struggle within government to get people, like, more basic services And then that, department that got that I mean, we got out of 20 years of war, and the Pentagon got a $50,000,000,000 raise. Like, that's shocking to me. Now, I may not understand exactly the ins and outs and and the incredible magic of an audit, but I'm a human being who lives on the earth and can't figure out how $850,000,000,000 to a department means that the rank and file still have to be on food stamps. Like, to me, that's fucking corruption. I'm sorry. And if, like, if that blows your mind, and if you think, like, that's like a crazy agenda for me to have, I really think that that's institutional thinking and that it's not looking at the day to day reality of the people that you call the greatest fighting force in the world. So I again, I get back to this idea of like, I'm not looking to pick a fight with you, but I am surprised at that the reaction to these questions are, you don't know what an audit is, Bucko. Like, that's just weird to me. Speaker 1: Okay. On food insecurity, major priority for us, a lot of funds are going toward that. The biggest issues we have found, 1st of all, we have significantly increased funding on food insecurity. And we do think we are getting much better on that. We believe of the challenges we face are not what you, you know, often think of as food insecurity as hunger. They're really around do we have food available, for instance, as people come on and off shifts, is it healthy food those are the types of food and security issues we are seeing in and around our military installations. We have increased pay two times in a row here. We've done 4.6% pay raise. Last year, we've asked for a 5.2% pay raise. This year, we've also increased basic, allowances and increased housing and pay, another allowances. So overall, we definitely think we need to increase the spending that we are putting forward toward our service members and their families. We're putting our money where our mouth is. Another big area is childcare, spending a lot more money on childcare. That includes both childcare facilities. And it includes, a benefit that allows folks to go out on the economy, to get childcare and have that subsidized by the government. Those are all examples of ways we're trying to put money forward for our service members and their families.
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 12:43 PM

@JMichaelWaller - J Michael Waller

Chief of Staff of Pentagon Counterterrorism Office served the Iranian mullahs. She’s still on the job, with security clearances. Consider our special ops forces to be compromised.

Chief of Staff of Pentagon Counterterrorism Office Served Iranian Gov. | Frontpage Mag Senior adviser worked on secret Iranian government propaganda campaign. frontpagemag.com
Saved - January 8, 2024 at 1:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Secretary of Defense's absence and power transfer on the same day as the Military Accountability letter raises questions. The letter mentioned cleaning up other Departments, suggesting a possible connection. Seeking insights from @doqholliday, @dom_lucre, and @boonecutler.

@Poltergeist360 - Don Sanborn

Does anyone find it coincidentally strange that the Secretary of Defense goes MIA with powers transferred the same day the Military Accountability letter is issued? The letter did state that the military was going to show other Departments how to clean their respective houses... It just seems connected 🤔 Any insight?? @doqholliday@dom_lucre @boonecutler

Saved - January 9, 2024 at 6:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The article by Kash Patel highlights the seriousness of Secretary of Defense Austin's period of absence. The author emphasizes the importance of the unbroken chain of command from the President to the Secretary of Defense, which is crucial for national security. Maintaining this authority is essential for the Department of Defense and its mission to protect the nation.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

For all, this is a must read article by Kash Patel on the seriousness of SECDEF Austin’s period of AWOL. Quote: “The national command authority is the constitutionally mandated, congressionally required, DoD directed unbroken chain of command from the president of the United States as our commander in chief to the secretary of defense. Our entire department of defense- the brave men and women in uniform, rely on this chain of command every single day to execute the no fail mission of protecting this great nation. There is no greater national security priority than maintaining its authority, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/kash-patel-heres-how-secretary-defense-lloyd-austin/

KASH PATEL: Here's How Secretary Of Defense Lloyd Austin Destroyed the National Command Authority | The Gateway Pundit | by Kash Patel Any SECDEF who is absent in his duties and fails to notify the chain of command has committed one of the most egregious acts against the national defense of this nation. thegatewaypundit.com
Saved - January 20, 2024 at 11:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In "Dereliction of Duty," the author recounts an incident where Clinton allegedly molested a female AF-1 steward. The author, a young major at the time, had to confront the president and request an apology. Clinton offered a half-hearted apology two weeks later. The author expresses frustration with working for someone lacking integrity and moral fiber.

@BuzzPatterson - Buzz Patterson

Here’s another Clinton story. This one IS in “Dereliction of Duty.” We were returning from Europe on AF-1, landed at Andrews, and helicoptered to the White House. We arrived at about midnight and, after ensuring the president was on his way upstairs, I headed to my bedroom in the East Wing. Shortly thereafter, the AF-1 pilot called me and said “we have a problem.” Clinton had cornered a female AF-1 steward in the galley and molested her. She was young, a staff sergeant, and married with a child. She didn’t want to be another “bimbo.”She only wanted an apology. “Oh, shit,” I thought. So, that morning, as a young major, I had to walk to the Oval Office and tell the commander-in-chief that he needed to apologize to the young lady. I remember on my way to talk with him thinking “I don’t get paid for this shit.” Two weeks later, we got the two together onboard AF-1 and he offered a very uncontrite “half apology.” He didn’t care. If anybody in the military had done that it would’ve been jail, expulsion, or both. Yet another in my experiences working for a man with no integrity and no moral fiber. It’s all in here: https://www.amazon.com/Dereliction-Duty-Eyewitness-Compromised-Americas/dp/0895260603/ref=la_B001IOBNIA_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339730111&sr=1-1

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com
Saved - February 14, 2024 at 3:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I used to be a true believer in everything the USA did abroad, but my perspective changed when I reached higher ranks in the military. I saw how our national leadership prioritizes self-interest over principles and how they manipulate the media. Despite this, I still believe in the Constitution and the American people. I despise their leaders for good reason. I hope you consider this perspective, but if not, I'll continue mocking your blind spots.

@CynicalPublius - Cynical Publius

@AEHarrod Look dude, I am going to stop mocking you for a few minutes and give you the straight dope, as a favor. Sincerely, I am doing this out of the goodness of my heart. I am not being sarcastic. I used to think and be like you. I was a true believer in all things USA, including our overseas escapades. For most of the time I was in uniform, I had absolute faith and confidence in the just cause of everything we did and do abroad. I was a zealot. I believed in Captain America. You could not have found a soldier more convinced that everything we did was right and just. But then I made it to the field grade ranks, up to O-6. I had a gift for speechwriting so between tactical assignments I found myself serving at the highest levels with more than one famous figure you have heard of. I saw how Congress works making the sausage. I saw how national and defense policies came into being. I saw how we negotiate with any powerful criminal thugs who would help us when we invade a country. I saw how we enter into a zone of propaganda with the national media. I was not one of the Big Dogs, but I was around the Big Dogs all the time, and I was there when they let their guards down and told the truth. I was with the Big Dogs in D.C., and I was with the Big Dogs downrange in war. I know how they think and act. And it shocked me. It shocked me to my core. Most of our national leadership are unprincipled charlatans, concerned only about what will help their reputations, their careers, and their bank accounts. They have no principles other than self-interest, and the self-interest of members of The Big Dog Club is the entire basis for all things our leaders do. All of it. 100%. (As a side note, it's why they MUST destroy Trump.) I still deeply believe in the Constitution and the American people. The Constitution is the least imperfect governing document ever invented by mankind. It is pure genius, and I love it more than any document other than The Bible. I still believe in the American people. The American people possess a maverick independent spirit and the strength of an amalgamation of all the world's cultures in one place. They are an indomitable, beautiful people. I love them. But it's their leaders I despise, and for good reason. There. This was an honest attempt to reach an educated man like you about the blind spots you may have about how we are governed. If you take it, you have my respect. If you leave it, I will go back to mocking your institutional blind spots. Finis.

Saved - April 12, 2024 at 2:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sam has discovered a memo about using force for involuntary immunizations. I question the impact on morale and unit cohesion if members are expected to assault and violate other service members. Two high-ranking medical professionals support this practice, but their identities and workplace remain unknown. Only one doctor out of hundreds complained about the unethical and illegal use of force to involuntarily immunize servicemembers with an experimental drug.

@LTCTheresaLong - Theresa M Long, MD, MPH, FS

Oh I see Sam found the memo about using force for involuntary immunizations… What do you suppose the impact would be on morale and unit esprit de corps, if members were expected to assault other service members holding them down and committing medical rape against them….can anyone who claims to be a leader -honestly advocate that service members assaulting and violating other servicemembers is a good idea? Not 1 but 2 high ranking medical professionals put their name to this gem…but who are they??? Where do they work?? And out of hundreds of doctors this email was sent to- how many complained about unethical, immoral and illegal practice of using force to involuntarily immunize servicemembers with an EXPERIMENTAL drug??? Answer: 1

@samosaur - Shoe

@LanceCastle8, the Airman in the viral video below, voiced his disdain over being labeled an insider threat after he refused an experimental drug he was illegally being ordered to take. He was rightfully enraged due to the character assassination and false charges levied against him; the same charges he was found not guilty of by a judge in a court martial. While he was not force vaccinated as much of the misinformation surrounding this video has suggested, it’s not a crazy premise. In fact, the pentagon was on the verge of ordering “involuntary vaccinations” as is evidenced by this information paper signed by BG Wendy Harter, Commanding General of U.S. Army Regional Health Command - Central. (I’ve spliced portions of the paper together. This is not the paper in its entirety.) The plan to force vaccinate troops was dropped after @LTCTheresaLong voiced her objections to her command as well as pentagon officials. The video below was the result of lawless decision making by leaders who abandoned federal statutes and weaponized mental health against service members who exercised their lawful right to refuse an EUA drug. By villainizing and labeling personnel as “mentally unwell, insider threats,” and more (stories and documentation I’ve received from hundreds of service members), commanders across the force were able to dodge the checks and balances put in place to safeguard the constitutional rights of service members and act with complete impunity. Some people, such as Lance, refused to go down without a fight, and chaos ensued. This is simply one example. Mark my words: without accountability for those who broke the law and spit on the constitution, this conduct will continue. This is the military you’re funding with your taxes. A military devoid of accountability which will readily abandon the law when it suits them.

Saved - April 18, 2024 at 10:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Captain Timothy Nick testified under oath about the alleged delayed response of the District of Columbia National Guard on January 6th, 2021. He criticized the inaccuracies and misstatements in the Department of Defense Inspector General's review. He revealed that senior Pentagon officials discussed denying the request to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol. The government's false narrative aims to frame Donald Trump and his supporters as insurrectionists.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

National Guard Captain Blows Up J6 Narrative, Accuses U.S. Govt of Lying to the American People "I'm here today to aid the subcommittee in resolving factual errors in the official record of what happened on January 6th, 2021, specifically regarding the alleged District of Columbia National Guard delayed response caused by a critical presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed Pentagon senior officials," Captain Timothy Nick testified under oath on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. [...] "First, I want to explain my role on January 6th. I was assigned as aid to camp the personal assistant to Major General William Walker, the commanding General of DC National Guard. It was my only second day on the job (!). Please focus on alleged facts found in the November 16th, 2021 Department of Defense Inspector General's multidisciplinary review into the DC National Guard response and Department of Defense's role that day." "I can say unequivocally that the Inspector General's Review is riddled with inaccuracies, misstatements, and perhaps false flags and narratives regarding how critical Pentagon senior officials responded when our republic was under great stress (!!)." "For instance, during a conference call at 2:31 PM with members of United States Army, US Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department, District of Columbia Government, and US Secret Service Uniform Division, the US Army's Lieutenant General Walter Piatt, Director of Army staff and the Army's Lieutenant General Charles Flynn, Director of Chief of Staff of Operations were on the call." Also was Colonel John Lubas, executive officer to the Secretary of the Army." "The Army FALSELEY DENIED that General Flynn was ever on the call. This is false and material on its face. Lieutenant Flynn was on the call and even participated in discussions. The defense inspector's review also rounds language papering over the fact that Lieutenant General Piatt, Lieutenant General Flynn, while on the call discussed how they did not like the OPTICS." "That is a direct quote, and they stated it would be in their best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army, Ryan McCarthy, to deny the request from Command General William Walker to deploy the DC National Guard and aid US Capitol Police in restoring restoration of Order Liberty on Capitol Hill." "In addition, former [Army] Secretary Ryan McCarthy claims he was on a two three 1:00 PM call and spoke on that call. This is FALSE, unless he was in the room shadowing the call and he did not speak nor identify himself." "He was not on the call. He was en route to Washington, DC Regional office at the Federal Bureau of Investigation to support that agent's concept of operations plan for January 6th." "He went on the claim that he called and spoke to Major General Walker at least twice, ordering the deployment of the DC National Guard. This is also FALSE. At no time did General Walker take any calls, nor did we ever hear from the secretary on any of the ongoing conference calls or the secure video teleconferencing throughout the day." "This I know because I was with the Command General the entire time recording events throughout the day. Major General Walker told by staff officers to stand by with respect to deploying to the Capitol Hill. Only at 5:09 PM in the early evening, which I wrote down in my wheel book, was the DC Guard given an order to deploy and move to the Capitol to assist Capitol Police." "We arrived too late. One American laid dead with other sisters and brothers injured, including federal and local law enforcement officers. We were ready and standing by. I know if we were able to deploy immediately, when General Walker made the request, the National Guard could have helped and civil disturbance and restored public order quickly." "The Army National Guard motto was always ready, always there. The DC National Guard was ready to help and assist Capitol Police, but we were NOT ALLOWED to do our job due to paralyzed decision-making by acting Secretary of Defense,Chris Miller and Secretary of the Army, Ryan McCarthy..." "This led to a crisis in federal leadership at the Pentagon and delayed the DC response by 3 hours and 19 minutes." This is critical testimony exposing the U.S. government as perpetrating a false narrative of events for January 6 to frame Donald Trump as participating in a treasonous "insurrection" when the opposite was true. The President of the United States had pre-authorized the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops and delegated this responsibility to the Secretary of the Army. But instead of deploying National Guard troops to secure the capitol during the election challenges in the Electoral College, the Pentagon delayed dispatching troops over an alleged concern for "optics," even as the same government would later call January 6 'an existential threat to democracy.' The U.S. government allowed the January 6 riots to happen in order to frame Donald Trump and his supporters as 'insurrectionists.' It is simple as that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am here to correct errors in the record of the January 6th events, focusing on the delayed National Guard response. The Inspector General's report contains inaccuracies, including false denials of key officials' involvement in decision-making. Despite requests to deploy, the Guard was held back, arriving too late to prevent violence. The delayed response was due to paralyzed decision-making by Pentagon leaders, causing a 3-hour delay. I hope to clarify the facts and answer any questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here today to aid the subcommittee in resolving factual errors in the official record of what happened on January 6, 2021, specifically regarding the alleged District of Columbia National Guard, the late response caused by a critical presidentially appointed senate confirmed Pentagon senior officials. I was concerned by the events that unfolded that day on the United States Capitol. As a federal officer of the United States Secret Service and a former state trooper with the Florida Highway Patrol, my heart goes out to all law enforcement officers, sisters and brothers that held the line that day to restore public order to the chaos. I'm here today with my counsels, Laughlin McKillan and Dan Meyer, of law firm Tully Rickney. The firm has advised me beginning with my role as a confidential source to a select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol. When my confidentiality was breached, it was Dan who who intervened to ensure I was protected as a military whistleblower. First, I wanna explain my role on January 6th. I was assigned as aide de camp, the personal assistant to major general William Walker, the commanding general of DC National Guard. It was my only second day on the job. Please focus on alleged facts about found in the November 16, 2021 Department of Defense inspector general's multidisciplinary review into the DC National Guard response in Department of Defense's role that day, I can say unequivocally that the inspector general's review is riddled with inaccuracies, misstatements, and perhaps false flags and narratives regarding how critical Pentagon senior officials responded when our republic was under great stress. For instance, during a conference call at 2:31 PM with members of United States Army, US Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department, District of Columbia Government, and US Secret Service Uniform Division, the US Army's Lieutenant General Walter Piatt, Director of Army Staff, and the Army's Lieutenant General Charles Flynn, Director of Chief of Staff of Operations, were on the call. Also, was Colonel John Lubitz, executive officer to the secretary of the Army. The army falsely denied that general Flynn was ever on the call. This is false and material on its face. Lieutenant Flynn was on the call and even participated in discussions. The defense inspector's review also rounds language papering over the fact that Lieutenant General Pyatt, Lieutenant General Flynn, while on the call, discussed how they did not like the optics. That is a direct quote. And they stated it would be in their best military advice to recommend to the secretary of the army, Ryan McCarthy, to deny the request from command general William Walker to deploy the DC National Guard and aid US Capitol Police in restoring restoration of border Liberty on Capitol Hill. In addition, former secretary of honor Ryan McCarthy claims he was on a 2:31 PM call and spoke on that call. This is false. Unless he was in the room shadowing the call, and he did not speak nor identify himself, he was not on the call. He was en route to Washington DC Regional Office at the Federal Bureau of Investigation to support that engine's concept of operations plan for January 6. He went on to claim that he called and spoke to major general Walker at least twice, ordering the deployment of the DC National Guard. This is also false. At no time did general Walker take any calls nor do we ever hear from the secretary on any of the ongoing conference calls or the secure video teleconferencing throughout the day. This I know because I was with the command general the entire time recording events. Throughout the day, major general Walker told by staff officers to stand by with respect to deploying to the Capitol Hill. Only at 5:0:9 PM in the early evening, which I wrote down in my wheel book, was the DC Guard give an order to deploy and move to the capital to assist capital police. We arrived too late. One American laid dead with other sisters and brothers injured, including federal and local law enforcement officers. We were readied and standing by. I know if we were able to deploy immediately when general Walker made the request, the National Guard could have helped end civil disturbance and restored public order quickly. The Army National Guard motto is always ready, always there. The DC National Guard was ready to help and assist Capitol Police, but we were not allowed to do our job due to paralyzed decision making by acting secretary of defense Chris Miller and secretary of the army Ryan McCarthy. This led to federal leadership in the Pentagon. This led to a crisis in federal leadership at the Pentagon and delayed the DC response by 3 hours and 19 minutes. Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today and articulate the facts as they happened. I look forward to answering any questions you may have.
Saved - July 5, 2024 at 5:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There are rumors that the Democrats might replace Joe Biden with Hillary Clinton after the upcoming debate. The author, who worked closely with the Clintons, shares their experience of Hillary's reputation for rudeness and lack of professionalism. They recall how staff would hide when she was around, and how she tried to ban military uniforms in the White House. The author believes the Clintons are corrupt and describes Hillary as evil and vindictive. They also promote their book on the subject.

@BuzzPatterson - Buzz Patterson

I’m hearing rumors from several sources that the Democrats are planning to dump Joe Biden after the upcoming debate and replace him. It’s not going to be with Kamala Harris. It’s going to be Hillary Clinton.  As some of you know, I was the Air Force Military Aide for Bill Clinton, lived in the White House, traveled everywhere they traveled, and carried the “nuclear football.” As such, I was always in close proximity to both Bill and Hill. Among the military who served in the White House and the professional White House staff, the Clinton administration was infamously known for its lack of professionalism and courtesy, though few ever spoke about it. But when it came to rudeness, it was Hillary Clinton who was the most feared person in the administration. She set the tone. From the very first day of my assignment.  When I first arrived to work in the White House, my predecessor warned me. “You can get away with pissing off Bill, but if you make her mad, she’ll rip your heart out.” I heeded those words. I did make him mad a few times, but I never really pissed her off. I knew the ramifications. I learned very quickly that the administration’s day-to-day character, whether inside or outside of DC, depended solely on the presence or absence of Hillary. Her reputation preceded her. We used to say that when Hillary was gone, it was a frat party. When she was home, it was “Schindler’s List.”  In my first few days on the job — and remember, I essentially lived there — I realized there were different rules for Hillary. She instructed the senior staff, including me, that she didn’t want to be forced to encounter us. We were instructed that “Whenever Mrs. Clinton is moving through the halls, be as inconspicuous as possible.” She did not want to see “staff” and be forced to “interact” with anyone — no matter their position in the building.  Many a time, I’d see mature, professional adults, working in the most important building in the world, scurrying into office doorways to escape Hillary’s line of sight. I’d hear whispering, “She’s coming, she’s coming!” I could be walking down a West Wing hallway, midday, busier than hell, people doing the administration’s work, whether in the press office, medical unit, wherever. She’d walk in, and they’d scatter. She was the Nazi schoolmarm, and the rest of us were expected to hide as though we were kids in trouble. I wasn’t a kid. I was a professional officer and pilot. I said, “I’m not doing that.”  There was also a period of time when she attempted to ban military uniforms in the White House. It was the reelection year of 1996, and she was trying to craft the narrative that the military was not a priority in the Clinton administration. As a military aide, carrying the football and working closely with the Secret Service, I objected to that. It simply wasn’t a matter of her political agenda; it was national security. If the balloon went up, the Secret Service would need to find me as quickly as possible. Seconds matter. Finding the aide in military uniform made complete sense. Besides, what commander-in-chief wouldn’t want to advertise his leadership and command? She finally relented because the Secret Service weighed in. If the Democrats dump Biden, and I think they’re going to have to, good ole Hill will be on the shortlist. If she runs, I will dedicate this space to raining hell on her campaign. The Clintons are corrupt beyond words. Hillary is evil, vindictive, and profane.  As a result, I wrote this: https://www.amazon.com/Dereliction-Duty-Eyewitness-Compromised-Americas/dp/0895260603/ref=la_B001IOBNIA_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339730111&sr=1-1

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com
Saved - July 31, 2024 at 11:08 AM

@HawleyMO - Josh Hawley

The Secret Service director to me today: a lot of people made a lot of mistakes but we won’t tell you who and we won’t fire anybody

Saved - September 12, 2024 at 11:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reached out to John Kirby for comment on veterans criticizing him for covering for Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal. He mistakenly hit “reply all,” stating, “Obviously no use in responding. A 'handful' of vets indeed and all of one stripe.” Disgraceful.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Fox reached out to John Kirby, the National Security Communications Advisor, for comment about veterans criticizing him for covering for Biden’s disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. He mistakenly hit “reply all.” His response said “Obviously no use in responding. A "handful" of vets indeed and all of one stripe.” Disgraceful.

Saved - October 5, 2024 at 11:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On November 27, 2023, I shared a video that my commanding officer ordered me to remove within 24 hours. Despite its removal, it had already been saved by many. I never received a valid reason for this order. By week's end, my computer access was revoked, and I was deemed untrustworthy by CAPT Sharon House. I find it ironic that those in leadership, including the DoD and military leaders, are trusted while I am not for exposing important information. My loyalty lies with the people, the Constitution, and God, not with those who wish to conceal the truth. Enjoy my retirement!

@ted_macie - Ted

On November 27, 2023, I posted this video here on X, and within 24 hours, I was ordered by my commanding officer to remove it, so I did. It had already been saved by thousands around the world, and it was too late for the military "leadership" to put the cat back into the bag. No legitimate explanation was ever given for why they wanted it removed. By the end of the week, my computer access was taken away. It was never restored. The commanding officer, in communications that did not involve me, said that she wouldn't restore it because I wasn't trustworthy. CAPT Sharon House claimed I wasn't trustworthy but the DoD, the government, and every military leader who was given this information (including @USNavyCNO) and have chosen not to act should be trusted? These people want to hide these things from the public, and I am untrustworthy for trying to expose the data. CAPT House, ADM Franchetti, what you and your cronies and overlords wanted was for me to be loyal to all of you by hiding this damning information from the world. In that case, you are correct, you can not trust me to do that. My allegiance lies with the people, the nation, the Constitution, and, above all, God. Now, these are the only authorities fit to give me any order. Enjoy my retirement!⚖️⏳️😉

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is elaborating on his wife's recent post, giving an example of why reinstatement, back pay, and apologies aren't enough. He references Undersecretary Cisneros acknowledging in July that the DMAT data was working properly and acknowledging a 151% rise in myocarditis. The speaker then compared a 5-year average to 2022 data, focusing on active duty fixed wing and helicopter pilots. The results showed increases in several conditions: hypertensive disease (36%), ischemic heart disease (69%), pulmonary heart disease (62%), heart failure (973%), other forms of heart disease (63%), and cardiomyopathy (152%).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you may have seen my wife's recent post, and I want to elaborate on that and give you an example as to why reinstatement, back pay, and and apologies isn't enough. So in July, undersecretary Cisneros acknowledged the DMAT data, the database working properly, and also acknowledged things such as myocarditis rising a 151%. So what I did, I went in today. I'm doing the same thing, 5 year average. However, I'm comparing it to 2022, and I only am using fixed wing pilots and helicopter pilots in active duty. We get hypertensive disease, 36%, ischemic heart disease, 69%, pulmonary heart disease, 62%, heart failure, 973%. Other forms of heart disease, 63%. Cardiomyopathy, 152%.
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 3:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I worked under Capt Sharon House as my XO to Capt Shelly Perkins at Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton during COVID. As one of the lead COVID Officers, I have some insights about them. They asked me to break federal laws, which I refused to do, even when Perkins moved me to a camera-free area to discuss it. I don't trust either of them. I appreciate the support for standing up against wrongdoing.

@AdamAppleXx - Adam Apple

Capt Sharon House was your CO?!? She was my XO to Capt Shelly Perkins as the CO for Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, during COVID. I was on of their lead COVID Officer… I have diiiiirt on her and was their right hand man for some things. (I ran the clinic that saw people and the drive thru tent, not the vaccine area). They ordered me to break federal laws, I told them what they asked was illegal, and if they knew that, they said yea. So I told them, “Ok”, and never did it. Perkins even moved me to an area without cameras, so the conversation wouldn’t be seen. Perkins and House are not trustworthy people. You stood up against evil brother, and you did well, just know that.

Saved - October 29, 2024 at 10:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a clip where an MSNBC host questioned the likelihood of five generals lying about what Trump supposedly said privately. This made me reflect on various instances where groups of professionals have misled the public, such as the 51 intelligence experts regarding Hunter's laptop, numerous individuals about Russian collusion, and many about the Fine People Hoax. Additionally, millions of medical professionals provided misleading information during the pandemic, and many scientists have been untruthful about climate model reliability. So, five generals lying doesn’t seem far-fetched to me.

@ScottAdamsSays - Scott Adams

I saw a clips today in which an MSNBC propagandist was asking how likely it was that five generals would lie about what Trump allegedly said behind closed doors. Well... 51 Intel professionals lied about Hunter's laptop. Hundreds of government and media pros lied about Russian Collusion Thousands of government and media pros lied about the Fine People Hoax (and dozens of other Trump hoaxes). Millions of medical professionals lied during the pandemic. Millions of scientists are lying about the reliability of climate models. Five lying generals isn't even a stretch.

Saved - November 15, 2024 at 5:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread of anecdotes about women in the military, revealing some troubling dynamics. I noted that female commanders often struggle under pressure, leading to chaotic situations. Instances of emotional breakdowns during training and deployment were common. Special treatment for women, including avoidance of deployment due to pregnancy, was prevalent. I highlighted issues of indiscipline, misuse of sexual assault claims, and the negative impact on unit cohesion. Ultimately, I argued that the integration of women has led to significant challenges within military operations.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

Here’s a thread of anecdotes about women in the military. A peek at the actual dynamics behind the “go girl” propaganda. Enjoy. 1. It’s common for Generals to cultivate harems of female staff. Often one becomes “court mistress” and blocks out other staff she doesn’t like.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

2. Female commanders commonly become overwhelmed by routine stressful situations. I have had buddies who had to yell at their female bosses to give orders because they went catatonic at breaking down a TOC in a rainstorm.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

3. Females breaking down crying on training ruck marches in good conditions. This is common.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

4. Females crying when bullets start flying and having to be literally kicked repeatedly to get out from behind cover and advance.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

5. Females getting special treatment for basically everything. Preferential admission for schools and training, females being hand-held through Ranger School, females being prioritized for career advancement in order to satisfy diversity targets.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

6. If a female gets pregnant, she can avoid deployment. During GWOT there were thousands of women who avoided combat deployment in this way, while their units went on to multi-year extended tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. This was absolutely endemic.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

7. Women destroy toughness and cohesion. First, they can’t perform, so it’s impossible to hold a standard. You can’t haze them. And you can’t haze the men because young guys don’t like being hazed in front of women. Impossible to create a strict relationship environment.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

8. On deployment women are (surprise) a constant source of indiscipline. They are always getting mixed up with men and alcohol (even if disallowed). Prostitution rings are not uncommon, often being pimped by a minority NCO.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

9. Females have recourse to a whole body of discipline meant to police sexual assaults, but it’s often abused. A common situation at the service academies is for a female to be involved in a consensual relationship, but if caught having sex (which is not allowed on post) she will claim she was being assaulted to escape punishment. Many men have had their lives essentially ruined by their girlfriends in this manner.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

10. One unit that I was in had the entire chain of command relived because they had ALL slept with one E4 who had been a stripper before she enlisted. Entire chain from BN CDR on down just one-shotted before they even got to combat.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

11. Females in female-heavy units like medical support often start whisper campaigns against bosses they don’t like, filing spurious SHARP complaints in an effort to get their boss fired.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

12. This is a fun little one. Female soldiers are notorious for sneaking out the protective plates in their armored vests so they weigh less.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

13. Females often abuse the medical system to obtain “profiles” that excuse them from running or marching. One female at one of the service academies was notorious for running competitively every track season, then wearing an orthopedic boot EVERY summer training season.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

14. The presence of females in the military has to be supported by endless rounds of training. A lot of time is wasted for this. Many of the trainings bring in civilian diversity consultants which is about what you’d expect. Grad students lecturing to an auditorium of soldiers about toxic masculinity. A waste of time and completely insulting.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

15. To summarize: 1. Women can’t perform to the required physical standards, compromising performance 2. Women introduce relational problems that compromise discipline, that can never be solved 3. Women are prioritized for better treatment, which destroys cohesion Women do not belong in the military.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

There’s also a larger point to be made. This feminist boosterism rose to the level of strategic significance. We were in Afghanistan for explicitly feminist goals (educate the little girls) and American female soldiers were essentially supposed to be the template that the new Afghan female would look up to. There was a program that embedded women with SF units that was supposed to accomplish this goal. They were supposed to be like Marvel heroes to inspire afghan girls. We saw how that worked out. The afghan army folded and we pulled out in defeat. In retrospect we can see how the supposed success of Obama era girl power integration really led these people to believe they could reshape Afghanistan at will. I hope the tawdry realities of women in combat shared in this thread give you some insight into just how fake that vision always really was, and how inevitable its failure would be.

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

Bonus Round stories from friends: 16. "The FET (Female Engagement Team) attached to my platoon once wandered off during a patrol, because their E5 NCOIC fancied herself just the same as a maneuver unit, I noticed but it was too late they were inside some house of the village elder, he freaks out and starts yelling because we’d broken social decorum, patrol ends with all their men throwing rocks at us. Miracle this didn’t end up going a different way."

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

17. "You could always tell which unit was deploying at JBLM because in the morning you’d see a bunch of females with the same PT belts with their unit written on them doing “pregnant PT” around the airfield." (ie units that were about to deploy were easily identifiable because the women in those units would get pregnant all at the same time)

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

18: FET teams nothing but trouble, compromise security: "I’ve got a story. I’m ripping out with the replacement platoon. My guys have already gone back to KAF ready to go home. I stick around and go on patrols for 5 days with the incoming platoon. First day I’m showing them how we do a TCP at one of the afghan police outposts, stopping and searching civilian vehicles. This new platoon had a FET team attached to them, and in the middle of the check point, fully exposed, 3 of the 4 NCOs, instead of monitoring their brand new scared privates on the perimeter, spent the entire op gathered around and flirting with the “cute” FET team. All eyes inward in a little half circle gaggle."

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

19: No words at all for this one 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/zp8uRPacTD

@myth_pilot - 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐬

20. Women getting special UCMJ treatment: "Here’s my women in the military story. When I was a CPT I PCS’d to a new duty station and was immediately put in charge of a female Puerto Rican LTC in my specialty, which is extremely unusual given that she outranked me by two ranks. It turns out this was due to the fact that she popped hot for cocaine during a UA. She was not kicked out, but did have to submit to weekly UA’s for a year. She made it to week 50 and popped hot again. She still wasn’t kicked out."

Saved - November 26, 2024 at 7:32 PM

@Texas_jeep__guy - 🇺🇸𝓒𝓱𝓪𝓭🇺🇸𝓗𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓷🇺🇸

If you work for the DOD and you had to do something like this you need to resign. https://t.co/jou8vX7Piu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Claims have emerged that the State Department used taxpayer funds to provide therapy sessions for employees coping with Trump's election win. Congressman Darrell Issa is demanding a private briefing to investigate the costs, the number of sessions, and whether similar sessions have occurred in the past due to other events. In a letter to Secretary Blinken, he expressed concern that the department is catering to employees upset by the election results, specifically citing the disappointment over Kamala Harris not being elected president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Claims that the state department, listen to this, use taxpayer dollars for your money to fund therapy sessions to help employees cope after Trump's win. These are federal employees. In California, congressman Darrell Issa is demanding a private briefing by the end of today on the alleged sessions. He wants answers on how much money they cost the department, how many took place, have these types of therapy sessions for employees ever taken place before, And if so, what events prompted them? Writing in a scathing letter to secretary Blinken, quote, I am concerned that the department is catering to federal employees who are personally devastated by the normal functioning of American democracy through the provision of government funded mental health counseling because Kamala Harris was not elected president of the United States.
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 5:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Mark Milley misrepresented Joe Biden's mental fitness during a 60 Minutes interview to influence the election in favor of Trump. I frequently meet with Biden, and each time, I find him alert, engaged, and well-prepared on serious matters. It's concerning that people might doubt his capability in making critical decisions about war and peace, but I assure them he is fit for the responsibilities he holds, including those related to nuclear weapons.

@CortesSteve - Steve Cortes

🚨Mark “White Rage” Milley lied about Joe Biden’s mental fitness a year ago in a 60 Minutes interview because he didn’t want President Trump to win the election. This was a massive cover-up: “I meet frequently with the President and every single time I meet with [Biden] — he’s just fine. How people interpret that is up to them. But I engage with him frequently and he’s alert, sound, does his homework, reads the papers, reads all the read-ahead material. And he's very, very engaging in issues of very serious matters of war and peace and life and death. So if the American people are worried about an individual who is, you know, someone who's making decisions of war and peace and has access to, you know, makes the decisions of nuclear weapons and that sort of thing, I think they can rest easy.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I meet frequently with the president, and each time he is alert, engaged, and well-informed. He thoroughly prepares for discussions on serious matters, including war and peace. If the American people have concerns about his decision-making, particularly regarding critical issues like nuclear weapons, they can feel reassured.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would just tell you that, I meet frequently with the president, and every single time I meet him, he is just fine. How people interpret that is up to them, but, I I engage with him frequently and and alert, sound, does his homework, reads the papers, reads all the read ahead material, and is very, very engaging in issues of very serious matters of war and peace and life and death. So if the American people are worried about an individual, who is, you know, someone who's making decisions of war and peace and, has access to, you know, makes the decisions of nuclear weapons and that sort of thing, I think they can rest easy.
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 6:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
General Milley expresses a desire to avoid conflict and retribution for perceived slights, prioritizing the well-being of his family, friends, and colleagues. He reflects on the suffering caused by those in power, highlighting the devastating impact on innocent lives, including suicides and ruined futures. He criticizes the cowardice of those who inflicted such harm, noting their fear of facing consequences for their actions.

@BrandonStraka - Brandon Straka #WalkAway

General Milley: “I do not wish to spend whatever remaining time the Lord grants me fighting those who unjustly might seek retribution for perceived slights. I do not want to put my family, my friends, and those with whom I served through the resulting distraction, expense, and anxiety.” None of these gutless piles of shit wanted to endure what they just put thousands of us through. These people drove innocent people to suicide, and wrecked the lives of countless others- and they tremble in cowardice at the prospect of being treated the way they abused their power to destroy others.

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 10:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been receiving many kind messages congratulating me and expressing gratitude for recent military reinstatement discussions. However, I question whether this is enough for me to return to service, given my views on the current state of the military and government. Reflecting on my past, I remember the difficult decision I faced when I was relieved of command for refusing the COVID shot. That period defined my career and tested my commitment to my oath and principles. I wonder if issues like treason, cowardice, and moral injury will ever be properly addressed.

@BradMiller1010 - Brad Miller

My phone's blowing up with many kind-hearted folks reaching out, congratulating me, even urging me to cut my hair 😎, & expressing their sincere gratitude for the president's recent remarks about military reinstatement & backpay. While I'm thankful for the genuine remarks of my friends & family, I must ask: is this enough for me to put the uniform back on? Our military is run by criminals & cowards. So is our govt. This isn't new & it hasn't changed. When will that be addressed? Let me know 👇 if you guys think I should go back. For the record, of course I support these actions (viewed independently from their possible motives). I just don't think it's nearly enough.

@BradMiller1010 - Brad Miller

3 yrs ago on June 10, 2021, I assumed battalion command fully knowing I'd be fired soon after. I was relieved of command Oct 28, 2021 for not complying with the covid shot mandate implemented in Aug 2021. The first 10 days of June 2021 were the hardest of my 19+ years in the Army. Even harder than the "10 toughest days in the Army" (Air Assault School 😎🤣). I arrived at Fort Campbell, KY on June 1 juggling a variety of emotions - excitement & nerves for command mixed with the sickening feeling that I'd soon endure the ignominy of being relieved of command & losing my career. There was no way I was going to take the covid shot & didn't want to order others to take it against their wishes. I didn't personally trust the shot & beyond that, I had assumed since Day 1 we were being lied to in some way with the covid narrative (though I didn't necessarily know how back then) and I always assumed it was an op. (I've been distrustful of the govt a very long time, which is difficult as an Army officer). There was no way I was going to go along with something I believed was ultimately intended to be destructive, even if it was difficult to exactly articulate how/why I thought that at that relatively early stage to others who would have found that idea preposterous. During those 10 days prior to taking command, I couldn't sleep. I wasn't even sure taking command was the right thing to do. I considered approaching the division commander (then Major General J.P. McGee) and telling him "Sir, I can't take command & it's better if I don't. You don't even want me in command. I'm clearly "not on the team" & it will be less disruptive to you, me, and most importantly the battalion if I don't take command just to be fired shortly thereafter." I decided against that though. I told myself "No, I'm not going to back down. I'm not the one wrong here. I'll make them fire a battalion commander." Then I tried to view it as the moral challenge it was. It was incredibly difficult. Perhaps it sounds arrogant (so be it), but to steel myself psychologically, I had to often remind myself that I was in the right even if that meant that virtually everyone around me (particularly at my peer level & above) was in the wrong. I don't care how that sounds. It is what it is. I've said many times that it's clear our senior military leaders obviously can't recognize the true strategic threats since they all went along with the covid op. I had to accept that in the grand scheme my entire command, which should have lasted 24 months but only lasted 4, would be reduced down to my decision on the covid jab. No one would care about the readiness levels of my battalion, my tactical acumen, the ways in which I adjudicated military justice, or any other way in which commanders are typically measured. I look back on that period from June - Oct 2021 as the defining period of my entire military career, to include my time at West Point. I've never tried to paint myself up as something I'm not. I've never said I was a great officer who always got everything right. But I do think I was a reasonably good officer who had a successful career (well, except for that whole "getting fired" part). I do take my oath to the Constitution seriously. I do love my country & care for my countrymen. And I do believe in doing the right thing because it's the right thing, consequences be damned. If you actually read this whole thing, let me know below 👇🤣

@BradMiller1010 - Brad Miller

Will the treason & cowardice be addressed: https://bradmiller10.substack.com/p/treason-and-cowardice

Treason and Cowardice The Military's New Watchwords bradmiller10.substack.com

@BradMiller1010 - Brad Miller

Will the issue of moral injury be addressed? https://bradmiller10.substack.com/p/moral-injury

Moral Injury Confronting the U.S. Military's Greatest Strategic Problem bradmiller10.substack.com
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 1:43 PM

@SeanParnellUSA - Sean Parnell

Congresswoman, I realize this may be a foreign concept to you but here at the DoD if you disrespect the chain of command & don’t do your job, you will be replaced. Period.

@RepJasmine - Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett

They fired Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield—not because she couldn’t do the job, but because she wouldn’t hang up pictures of Trump and Hegseth. This ain’t about merit—it’s about ego.

@SeanParnellATSD - Sean Parnell

Secretary Hegseth has removed U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield from her position as U.S. representative to NATO’s military committee due to a loss of confidence in her ability to lead. The Defense Department is grateful for her many years of military service.

Saved - April 11, 2025 at 1:36 PM

@SeanParnellATSD - Sean Parnell

Actions to undermine the chain of command or to subvert President Trump's agenda will not be tolerated at the Department of Defense. ⬇️⬇️

@Militarydotcom - Military.com

Space Force Commander in Greenland Sent Out Email Breaking with Vance After His Visit https://buff.ly/bNks0Xr

Buffer: Social media management for everyone Use Buffer to manage your social media so that you can create and share your content everywhere, consistently. Try our forever free plan or upgrade for more. buffer.com
Saved - May 18, 2025 at 3:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I accepted a position at DHS HQ to fight for my children's future and was fired for opposing career bureaucrats undermining Trump's agenda. I plan to expose the true nature of some so-called conservatives in the coming days. My colleague, Cameron, was also removed for his principled stance against corruption at DHS. His removal and mine highlight a deeper issue within the agency. I believe the best course of action for the President is to reinstate us to help address this corruption. Meanwhile, I'm busy at my restaurant and will share more details soon.

@MattForVA - Matt Strickland

President Trump has bad actors working for him subverting his agenda. At the highest levels. I accepted a position at DHS HQ not because I needed a job, but because I wanted to fight for my children’s future and the future of this country from the inside. I was just fired from DHS HQ for fighting the career bureaucrats that are subverting Trump’s agenda, and moreover, hellbent on continuing the destruction of America. In the coming days I will be dropping bombs that will include specifics on how household names - people you think are “conservative” - are not who you think they are. I tried to do things the correct way and expose the corrupt anti-American agenda being pushed in our government. I was fired for it. Since I followed my chain of command and was ignored, I will now bring the issues to the ultimate boss. You, the American People.

@RobGreen1010 - Rob Green

🚨The below @DHSgov corruption situation described by @MattForVA is worse than you think. And @CameronVA is an even better man with higher integrity than anyone realizes. Cameron was brought in as a fixer within the new administration because of his loyalty to the Constitution, his alignment with the America-First Agenda, and his own deeply principled biblical worldview. He fought hard to stay in alignment with President Trump and to do what was best for the American people. While leading FEMA, Cam identified and stood up to certain unprincipled officials at DHS who were doing things in unprincipled ways and aligning with the Deep State. The nonesense about him fighting against the administration to not shutter FEMA is trumped up nonsense and has almost little to do with why he was actually fired. In fact he was told he was being removed long before the committee hearing cited as the reason for his ouster. Cam was actually fired because he operated in principled ways and would not let corruption from DHS seep down into FEMA. Proving that the DHS corruption problem is far deeper than publicly known is what happened to Matt Strickland after posting the below note in support of Cameron Hamilton. Matt, who was serving in a position at a very high level within DHS Headquarters, had his credentials turned off and was called and told not to show back up to work. I spoke to Matt last night, who confirmed that he has still not been provided an official reason for his removal. Matt is no stranger to fighting back against weaponized government, which is part of the reason he was pulled into DHS in the first place. He is now being retaliated against for First Amendment protected speech, which he used to defend Cameron Hamilton. Things are very wrong when America’s most loyal sons are removed because of their integrity and their willingness to stand up against unprincipled actors. The very best thing that @POTUS can do in this situation for the American people, is to bring back Cam and Matt and place them into roles to help clean out the unprincipled and those aligned with Deep State actors.

@MattForVA - Matt Strickland

I’m convinced @realDonaldTrump doesn’t know the real reason @FEMA_Cam was fired. It wasn’t because Cam didn’t want to execute the President’s agenda. Cam supported exactly what Trump wants. To drastically reduce the size of FEMA, but not completely eliminate it. You can’t

@MattForVA - Matt Strickland

Not trying to be mellow-dramatic about “posting in the coming days.” I’m just at my real job, my restaurant - @gourmeltz - and I don’t have time to lay it out intelligently right now.

Saved - April 3, 2026 at 10:29 PM

@shanaka86 - Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

Twenty-six generals and admirals in fourteen months. No misconduct cited for a single one. A former Fox News weekend host who never held a senior military command has removed the Joint Chiefs Chairman, the Army Chief of Staff, the commander of Army Transformation and Training, the Chief of Chaplains, and at least 22 other senior officers from the most powerful military on earth. He blocked four Army officers from promotion to brigadier general, two Black men and two women, by unilaterally striking their names from a list of 36. When Army Secretary Dan Driscoll refused to remove them, Hegseth did it himself. No hearing. No review board. No Senate consultation. The names were struck because the man who reads the list decided they should not be on it. The pattern is not random. It is architectural. Every removal serves the same function: shortening the distance between a presidential decision and its execution. The officers who remain are the ones who did not resist. The officers who resisted are gone. The replacement for the Army Chief of Staff is Vice Chief General Christopher LaNeve, who served as Hegseth’s personal military aide. The man who carried the briefcase now signs the orders. The chain of command has been rebuilt so that every link answers directly to the man who removed the previous link. General Randy George was the commander of the United States Army’s ground forces. That title matters now in a way it did not matter six weeks ago. Before February 28, ground forces in Iran were a theoretical exercise discussed in war colleges and think tanks. After five weeks of air strikes, with the IRGC publishing bridge target lists across four allied nations, with the President saying the military has “not even started” destroying what remains, with MEUs staged in the Gulf and the 82nd Airborne deploying and JSOC operators at forward bases in four countries, the ground option is no longer theoretical. It is a logistics package. And the man whose job was to assess whether that package should be opened was told to retire the same day the President posted “much more to follow.” Lieutenant General Hodne ran the command that trains every soldier who would execute a ground operation. Major General Green led the chaplain corps that would minister to every soldier who dies in one. George decided whether the operation should happen. Hodne prepared the soldiers to carry it out. Green prepared them to live with it. All three were removed on the same afternoon. Congress has not held a hearing. No subpoenas issued. The legal authority for a Defence Secretary to unilaterally override promotion lists and force immediate retirement of Senate-confirmed officers during wartime has not been tested because nobody with the authority to question it has chosen to. The IRGC has said attacks will “intensify from next week.” The Ford carrier is heading back. The CNN intelligence assessment confirms half of Iran’s launchers and thousands of drones remain. The President has named the next targets: power plants, desalination, oil wells, Kharg Island. And every general who might have said “this crosses a line” is already gone. Twenty-six officers. Zero misconduct findings. One question that every general still serving is asking behind closed doors: who is left to say no? And what happens when the answer is nobody? https://open.substack.com/pub/shanakaanslemperera/p/the-last-molecule-standing?r=6p7b5o&utm_medium=ios

@shanaka86 - Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

JUST IN: You do not fire your Army Chief of Staff in the middle of a war for no reason. You fire him because of what comes next. Pete Hegseth called General Randy George on April 2 and told him to retire immediately. The Pentagon confirmed it within hours. No reason was given. Not publicly. Not privately. A senior Army official told Fox News that Hegseth offered George nothing: no misconduct, no operational failure, no policy disagreement on the record. Just a phone call and a career ending in the middle of the most significant American combat operation in two decades. George is the 24th general or admiral Hegseth has removed. But he is not the 24th. He is the one that matters. The Army Chief of Staff. The man whose signature sits between a president’s intent and the order that sends soldiers across a beach or into a tunnel complex. The 82nd Airborne is deploying right now. Marines from the 31st MEU are staged on the USS Tripoli. JSOC operators are at forward bases in Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. Kharg Island, 90 percent of Iranian oil exports, sits 16 kilometres off a coast that someone will have to decide whether to approach. And the four-star general whose job it was to advise whether that approach should happen was removed 48 hours after Trump told the nation the war would continue for two to three more weeks. The replacement is Vice Chief General Christopher LaNeve. He was Hegseth’s senior military aide before this appointment. The man who carried the Secretary’s briefcase now commands the Army the Secretary is reshaping. The chain of command did not break. It shortened. The distance between a television studio and a combat order just collapsed to zero intermediaries who were not personally selected by the man giving the order. No reason was given. That is the tell. When someone is removed without explanation during a crisis, the explanation is the crisis itself. George either objected to something or was about to. The ground option. The power plant strikes. The Kharg raid. The escalation that turned a highway bridge in Karaj into rubble on the same day he was told to leave. Something in the next two weeks requires a chief who will not push back, and the Pentagon solved that problem by installing one trained as Hegseth’s aide. A former Fox News weekend host just fired a four-star general with combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, replaced him with his own former assistant, and did it during a live war in which the next decision could put American soldiers on Iranian soil for the first time in history. No hearing was held. No misconduct cited. The Army woke up on April 3 with a new chief it did not choose, in a war it did not start, preparing for a phase the previous chief apparently could not be trusted to execute. The question is not why George was fired. Every general in the building knows why. The question is what order is coming in the next fourteen days that required removing the one man in the chain of command who might have said no. The war has no perimeter. The chain of command has no objectors. And the next phase has no one left to stop it. https://open.substack.com/pub/shanakaanslemperera/p/the-last-molecule-standing?r=6p7b5o&utm_medium=ios

Saved - January 20, 2024 at 3:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In "Dereliction of Duty," the author recounts an incident where Clinton allegedly molested a female AF-1 steward. The author, a young major at the time, had to inform the president and later witnessed a half-hearted apology. The author expresses frustration at working for someone they perceive as lacking integrity and moral fiber.

@BuzzPatterson - Buzz Patterson

Here’s another Clinton story. This one IS in “Dereliction of Duty.” We were returning from Europe on AF-1, landed at Andrews, and helicoptered to the White House. We arrived at about midnight and, after ensuring the president was on his way upstairs, I headed to my bedroom in the East Wing. Shortly thereafter, the AF-1 pilot called me and said “we have a problem.” Clinton had cornered a female AF-1 steward in the galley and molested her. She was young, a staff sergeant, and married with a child. She didn’t want to be another “bimbo.”She only wanted an apology. “Oh, shit,” I thought. So, that morning, as a young major, I had to walk to the Oval Office and tell the commander-in-chief that he needed to apologize to the young lady. I remember on my way to talk with him thinking “I don’t get paid for this shit.” Two weeks later, we got the two together onboard AF-1 and he offered a very uncontrite “half apology.” He didn’t care. If anybody in the military had done that it would’ve been jail, expulsion, or both. Yet another in my experiences working for a man with no integrity and no moral fiber. It’s all in here: https://www.amazon.com/Dereliction-Duty-Eyewitness-Compromised-Americas/dp/0895260603/ref=la_B001IOBNIA_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339730111&sr=1-1

503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com
View Full Interactive Feed