TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

stclairashley
Posted - October 5, 2023 at 8:07 PM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 9:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vivek Ramaswamy faced protestors at a campaign event. He respectfully engaged with them, appreciating their expression of views. However, one protestor crashed into Vivek's car, insulted him, and fled. This incident highlights the need for true free speech, where all voices are respected, not just those the Left agrees with. Ironically, the perpetrator's car had a Neighborhood Crime Watch sticker.

@stclairashley - Ashley St. Clair

Vivek Ramaswamy attended a campaign event earlier today & was met by a small group of protestors. He respectfully answered their questions and thanked them for expressing their views even while disagreeing with them. One of the protestors then got into their car, CRASH INTO VIVEK’S CAR, gave him + his staff the middle finger, and drove off. The Left calls itself the party of love and tolerance. But free speech means respect for ALL Americans’ speech and ensuring that ALL voices are heard— not just those the Left agree with. Ironically, the perp’s car had a Neighborhood Crime Watch sticker on it

RonDeSantis
Posted - November 15, 2023 at 1:10 AM
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 3:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, the anonymous writers of the Federalist Papers, exercised their constitutional right to voice opinions without fear. Banning anonymous speech online, as proposed by Haley, is dangerous and unconstitutional, akin to China's actions. It will be rejected in my administration.

@RonDeSantis - Ron DeSantis

You know who were anonymous writers back in the day? Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison when they wrote the Federalist Papers. They were not "national security threats," nor are the many conservative Americans across the country who exercise their Constitutional right to voice their opinions without fear of being harassed or canceled by the school they go to or the company they work for. Haley's proposal to ban anonymous speech online — similar to what China recently did — is dangerous and unconstitutional. It will be dead on arrival in my administration.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

NEW – Nikki Haley Says Allowing People to Post on Social Media Anonymously is a 'National Security Threat’ "Every person on social media should be verified by their name...It gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots, and the Chinese bots" https://t.co/C6GoT7n1cN

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses two important steps to be taken regarding social media. Firstly, they emphasize the need for social media companies to reveal their algorithms to the public. This transparency will allow people to understand why certain content is being promoted. Secondly, the speaker suggests that every individual on social media should be verified by their real name. This measure is seen as crucial for national security, as it would eliminate the presence of fake accounts, such as those operated by Russia, Iran, and China. By attaching real names to online statements, people will be more accountable for their words, leading to increased civility. Additionally, this verification process would also benefit children and families.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I get into office, the first thing we have to do, social media accounts social media companies, they have to show America their algorithms. Let us see why they're pushing what they're pushing. The second thing is every person on social media should be verified by their name. That's first of all, it's a national security threat. When you do that, all of a sudden, people have to stand by what they say. And it gets rid of the Russian bots, The Iranian bots and the Chinese bots. And then you're gonna get some civility when people know their name is next to what they say. Accountability. And they know their pastor and their family member is gonna see it. It's gonna help our kids, and it's gonna help our
Arkypatriot
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 8:22 PM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 8:32 PM

@Arkypatriot - USMC Lady Vet 🇺🇸👮

I told you she was crazy

@DontShedOnMe_1 - HJoseph

Nikki Haley says parents should be able to let their 12 year old child get a sex change operation. Mind you, parents can’t even let their 12 year old children get a tattoo. Disqualifying. She’s fking done. https://t.co/QBiiEQtSJO

Video Transcript AI Summary
A question was posed to the ambassador regarding the appropriate response when a 12-year-old child, who was assigned female at birth, expresses a preference for living as a boy. The speaker believes that the law should not intervene in this matter and that parents should take charge of the situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Madam ambassador, another question is what care should be on the table when a 12 year old child in this country assigned female at birth says actually I feel more comfortable living as a boy. What should the law allow the response to be? I think the law should stay out of it and I think parents should handle
RealPatrickWebb
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 1:20 AM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 1:51 AM

@RealPatrickWebb - Patrick Webb

Vivek Ramaswamy just called out Nikki Haley for being a fascist for wanting the government to identify every single anonymous poster on social media. https://t.co/2eJRKAWxpL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about Nikki Haley's interpretation of their book, suggesting she sees it as a guide rather than a warning. They also mention the danger of the "woke industrial complex" and compare it to George Orwell's works. The speaker believes that under Biden, the country is moving towards fascism, highlighting Jack Smith's subpoenas for retweets of Donald Trump. They criticize Nikki Haley for suggesting that the government should identify these individuals with an ID, labeling it as fascist and emphasizing that she should not have any power.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I I think you read that book, Ron. And the irony is Nikki Haley was heaping praise on me when I wrote that book, but now I worry I was warning about the woke industrial complex in this country as a warning. Apparently, she read it as a how to manual Alright. Just like to read Georgia Orwell's as well. And so I think that that's actually far more dangerous than this is really important for people to understand. We're marching towards fascism under Biden. Jack Smith has subpoenaed. Every last retweet that someone has issued from Donald Trump in the year 2020, the only person more fascist than the Biden regime now is Nikki Haley who thinks the government should identify every one of those individuals with an ID. That is not freedom. That is fascism, and she should come nowhere near the lever
CollinRugg
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 1:25 AM
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 12:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vivek Ramaswamy criticizes the Biden administration, accusing them of moving towards fascism. He highlights the subpoenaing of retweets from Donald Trump in 2020 as an example. Ramaswamy goes on to call Nikki Haley, a potential candidate, even more fascist for suggesting the government should identify these individuals with an ID. He emphasizes that this is not freedom but rather fascism, stating she should not be near the levers of power.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: Vivek Ramaswamy shreds the Biden administration then turns on Nikki Haley and calls her a bigger fascist than Joe Biden. 🔥🔥🔥 “We're marching towards fascism. Under Biden, Jack Smith has subpoenaed every last retweet that someone has issued from Donald Trump in the year 2020.” “The only person more fascist than the Biden regime now is Nikki Haley, who thinks the government should identify every one of those individuals with an ID. That is not freedom, that is fascism. And she should come nowhere near the levers of power, let alone the White House.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about Nikki Haley's shift in attitude towards their book, which warned about the "woke industrial complex." They compare Haley's interpretation of the book to a how-to manual. The speaker also believes that the current direction under Biden's administration is leading towards fascism. They mention Jack Smith's subpoena of retweets from Donald Trump in 2020 and criticize Haley's suggestion of government identification for individuals. The speaker concludes by stating that Haley should not have any power, including the White House.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I I didn't write that book, Ron. And the irony is Nikki Haley was heaping praise on me when I wrote that book, but now I worry I was warning about the woke industrial complex in this country as a warning. Apparently, she read it as a how to manual. Just like to read Georgia Orwell's book. Okay. Alright. As well. And so I think that that's actually far more dangerous than I would this is really important for people to understand. We're marching towards fascism under Biden. Jack Smith has subpoenaed. Every last retweet that someone has issued from Donald Trump in the year 2020. The only person more fascist than the Biden regime now is Nikki Haley who thinks the government should identify every one of those individuals with an ID. That is not freedom. That is fascism, and she should come nowhere near the levers of power, let alone the White House. I've got
leslibless
Posted - December 9, 2023 at 1:57 AM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 2:14 AM

@leslibless - 🇺🇸ProudArmyBrat

Casey DeSantis just called on ALL people EVERYWHERE to travel to Iowa to illegally vote! The @IowaGOP had to correct her claim! WTF IS WRONG WITH THIS WOMAN? https://t.co/wdqfkzN9Cx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Moms and grandmoms from all over the nation are invited to join the caucus in Iowa, regardless of their residency. They are encouraged to come and have their voices heard in support of a cause.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The nation. We're asking all of these moms and grandmoms to come from wherever it might be, North Carolina, South Carolina, and to descend upon the state of Iowa to be a part of the caucus because you do not have to be a resident of Iowa to be able to participate in the caucus. So moms and grandmoms are gonna be able to come and be a part and to let their voice be heard in support of
VivekGRamaswamy
Posted - December 30, 2023 at 5:08 PM
Saved - December 30, 2023 at 8:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CNN tried to silence my campaign by threatening a cease & desist after my town hall gained 200k+ views on YouTube. Meanwhile, Nikki Haley's town hall, with only 68k views after 6 months, is still up. They're clearly trying to prop up their puppet. CNN was bothered by the positive response my town hall received and replaced it with their own narrative.

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

This game is RIGGED. CNN threatened my campaign with a cease & desist within 12 hours of posting my town hall after it got 200k+ views on YouTube in a matter of hours. Yet Nikki Haley’s CNN town hall is still up after 6 months (68k total views, sad). They’re trying their best to prop up their puppet. Don’t let them.

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

The thing that really irritated the hell out of CNN is that it was actually an excellent town hall with voters who ended up responding very well to my message - so they fretted about people in this country actually seeing it, and substituted their own narrative instead.

VivekGRamaswamy
Posted - December 30, 2023 at 6:14 PM
Saved - December 31, 2023 at 2:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CNN's interference in the Iowa GOP caucus is offensive. They cut off my town hall early and threatened my campaign with a cease-and-desist for posting it on YouTube. Meanwhile, Nikki Haley's scripted town hall from 6 months ago is still up. CNN also notified us that certain qualifying polls wouldn't count for their fake debate. The dishonesty needs to end.

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

CNN’s egregious interference with the Iowa GOP caucus is offensive. My CNN town hall with the voters here went so well that they cut it off early & then threatened our campaign with a cease-and-desist for posting it on YouTube, while Nikki Haley’s scripted CNN town hall from 6 months ago is still up. Then CNN notified our campaign within 48 hours that multiple qualifying polls that the RNC used for its debates wouldn’t count for CNN’s fake “debate” that they’re hosting in Iowa on January 10. The dishonesty needs to end.

@TheReportX - The Report

FULL Vivek Ramaswamy Town Hall in CNN @VivekGRamaswamy #Vivek https://t.co/bK0f4oy3pP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ohio businessman Vivek Ramaswami participated in a CNN town hall in Iowa, where he faced questions from voters on various issues. He differentiated himself from former President Donald Trump by emphasizing his commitment to reaching a new generation of voters and his understanding of the law and the constitution. Ramaswami also discussed his plans to secure the border, address income inequality, promote diversity and inclusion, and support religious freedom. He expressed his belief in the importance of diversity of thought and meritocracy, rather than implementing racial and gender quotas. Ramaswami highlighted the need for hard work and a sense of purpose to revive the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, and welcome to Iowa, home of the first contest of the 2024 presidential race, now just 33 days away. We are live here at Grand View University in Des Moines, Iowa for CNN's town hall with Ohio businessman Vivek Ramaswami. I'm Abby Phillip. Mister Ramaswami Has made a name for himself in this field with his bold and sometimes controversial positions. Now he is prepared to face his 1st test before voters Right here in Iowa where he is competing with his rivals including the current front runner, former president Donald Trump. Now tonight's event is about the voters. Mister Ramaswami will have the opportunity to answer questions directly from Iowans on the issues that will help determine Who wins the Republican nomination? And I will, of course, have some questions of my own. In the audience here are voters who say that they plan to participate in the Iowa Republican caucuses, both registered Republicans and also voters who plan to register as Republicans. To find tonight's questioners, we reached out to Republican affiliated groups as well as business groups, farm associations, parent groups, young professional organizations, religious groups, and conservative advocacy organizations. Guests of the Ramaswami campaign and of Grand View University are here in the audience tonight, but they won't be asking We have asked everyone here to be respectful to each other and to mister Ramaswami so that the voters in this room and at home have a chance to hear from the candidate. Now please welcome, Vivek Ramaswami. I wanna get right to the audience and bring in Simona Yientes from Clive, Iowa. She is self employed and serves on the board of a Christian school in Des Moines. She's a Republican, but she says that she is still undecided. Simona? Speaker 1: Thank you. First of all, welcome to Iowa, and Merry Christmas from Iowa. And thank you for really adding some important conversations to the to the campaign. So some local commentators refer to you as maybe the younger Trump, not a politician, which would place you running in the same lane as President Trump for getting votes. So other than being younger, how would you different your differentiate yourself from president Trump? Speaker 2: So look. I I appreciate that question, and I get it frequently these days on the campaign trail. It's not just being younger. I think we are reaching a new generation of voters in this country. We've been to most of the college campuses across this state, and I don't think that's something the Republican Party has done a great job of. There's a reason why these revolutions, these revivals are often led by the next generation. Thomas Jefferson was 33 years old when he wrote the Declaration of Independence. I'm an old man by comparison, actually, to Thomas Jefferson. And I will say this. It's gonna take a president who, yes, comes from the outside, is a businessman. I believe it's gonna take an outsider with sharp elbows at times To come take on the federal bureaucracy, to shut down agencies that need to be shut down, to implement that 75% headcount reduction I want to see in the federal bureaucracy. But it's also gonna take a president who has a deep first personal understanding of the law and the constitution. And those 2 things don't usually go together. I've actually hired many people in my career over the many companies that I've started. And Those 2 skills, you might have the academic law professor types over here, you might have the business types that are gonna get something done. That's what gives me my sense of purpose in this race, And I think I'm the only person in this race who brings both of those attributes, an understanding and a commitment to the constitution, but combine that with being an outsider who can actually get things done. And I think that's gonna be take the combination that actually takes to revive this economy and revive our constitutional republic. Speaker 0: And if I may, mister Ramaswami, Simona's question was about How you would be different from Speaker 2: Donald Trump. Speaker 0: So how specifically would you differentiate yourself from Trump? Speaker 2: Look. I think some are some policy areas. I mean, take The Iowa carbon capture pipeline. The use of eminent domain right here. It doesn't affect many in the national audience, but it affects people in this room. I'm seeing many heads nodding. You're familiar with this issue. They're using eminent domain to seize farmland, to build a carbon capture pipeline using federal subsidies. I'm the only candidate in this field Who has taken a clear stand in being against those kinds of policies, the unconstitutional use of eminent domain. So we can go into other specific examples, but it comes down to a commitment To the constitution. A deep understanding of the constitution, swearing an oath to the constitution and keeping it, and combining that with being an outsider. And, yes, reaching and inspiring the next generation of Americans. I think I'm the best person in this race to do those things, and that's why I'm in it. Speaker 0: Let's bring in now Jacqueline Ricconosh. She's a health care IT manager from West Des Moines. She's a republican who says that she's undecided. Jacqueline? Speaker 3: Thank you. Welcome. Thank you. I'm a switch it up. With the number of illegals, illegal aliens crossing the border daily And being best to cities across the United States, how do you plan to secure our border and remove illegals from the US? Speaker 2: And that 2nd part is the harder part. I'm glad you asked it. Let me start with the 1st part of how we'll just secure the border. These are basic things we can do. The country that put a man on the moon can get this done. It's just a question of political will. So one thing I've said is we will use our own military To secure our own border. Right now, we can use it to secure somebody else's border. Let's use it to secure our own southern border And our northern border too. Don't forget about that. Our northern border has seen more illegal crossings this past year than the last 12 years combined. That's where this front is going, and I visited both in the last several months. If we're able to do that, use our military, complete the border wall, Stop federal aid to any Central American country until they have secured their own borders for every country between Venezuela and Mexico. Then I want to implement, I would say, the best border policies of all, which is ending the illegal incentives to be here, End birthright citizenship for the kids of illegal migrants to whom the 14th amendment does not apply. End federal funding to sanctuary cities using Our own taxpayer money to pay effectively for breaking the rule of law. And then there's the hard question. I don't wanna leave you hanging on that one Because many people skip this one, but this one's the hard one. I do believe that anybody who's in this country illegally Needs to be returned to their country of origin, not because they're all bad people. In fact, many of them are good people. Many of them, if we're being honest, If we were in their shoes and there's a president of the United States who's been giving them a wink and a nod to come on over, if we were in a tough spot, maybe we would have done the same thing. So This is not a value judgment about those people. It's a value judgment about this country. We're founded on the rule of law, and as a father of sons in the White House. I can't look them in the eye and tell them they have to follow the rules when our own government isn't following its own rules. Then there's the question of how, and this is the part many Republicans skip. There's only 6,000 or so ICE agents on the front line. How could they possibly tackle Millions of illegal migrants who were in this country illegally. Here's the answer. There's a provision in the law. We don't need new laws. The existing law, it's called 287 g. It allows you to actually serve an ICE agent to allow local law enforcement across this country to serve their warrants. That's a 1000000 law enforcement officers. We can then get that done. But, again, all it takes is a president with a spine. And if I swear an oath to the constitution, I intend to keep it. That's how I'm gonna lead this country, and I think that's how we're gonna solve not only the border crisis, but the crisis of the abandonment of the rule of law in this country. That's how I expect a lead. Speaker 0: You just said that you would end birthright citizenship Speaker 2: For the kids of illegal Speaker 0: kids of illegal migrants. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 0: Immigrants. There are currently millions of such People, children, some of them some of them adults. Would you retroactively strip them Great Speaker 2: question, Abby. So I'm glad you asked that prospectively. So January 20, 2025 forward, there is a concept in the law known as a reliance interest. If you've relied on the government, we're not gonna be able to retroactively date that. But from January 20, 2025 going forward, if I'm the president, if you're born in this country as the kid of an illegal immigrant, You will not enjoy birthright citizenship, and that's what the 14th Amendment says. It says it only applies subject to the jurisdiction thereof. That's in the Opening section of the 14th amendment, when it talks about birthright citizenship. So in the same way, and I want people to understand this because some people call this a controversial view. I don't think it needs to be. The kid of a Mexican diplomat who's here legally and he's born in the United States, that person doesn't enjoy birthright citizenship. Nobody contests that. Well, if the kid of a Mexican diplomat who's here legally does not enjoy birthright citizenship, Neither does or should the kid of a Mexican or Venezuelan migrant who's here illegally. And there's been case law on this at the appellate court level. The one case that's ruled agrees with me on this. I believe the current Supreme Court agrees with me 6 to 3 on this. All we need is a president with a spine who, I go back to that first question, Abby, understands the constitution. If I'm gonna swear notes to the constitution, I better darn well have read it. You suggested That's what I'm gonna do. Speaker 0: You suggested, though, the courts would have to weigh in on this. Would you agree with that? Speaker 2: I expect that this will go to the Supreme Court, and I expect the current Supreme Court will agree 6 to 3 with me on this based on my study of the court. Speaker 0: Alright. Let's turn now to Mike McCoy. He's an insurance company CEO from West Des Moines and a trustee here at Grand View. He's a republican who says that he's deciding between you and Florida governor Ron DeSantis. Mike? Speaker 4: Thank you. So what makes you think that Putin would be responsive to your Ukraine solution? Speaker 0: And before you jump in, mister Ramaswami, I just want to, ask you to remind the audience here what the solution is that he is referring to. Speaker 2: That's fair enough. So I've proposed and thank you for coming prepared. I appreciate that. I proposed a reasonable end to the Ukraine war. I don't think this war is advancing our interests. I think we're spending $200,000,000,000 of our taxpayer money that would be better used to defend our own border. But even worse, I believe it's increasing the risk of World War three Because it's driving Russia further into China's hands. So what I've proposed is a reasonable deal that would allow Ukraine to come out with its sovereignty intact. Yes. With some territorial concessions of the Russian speaking regions in eastern Ukraine and a hard commitment that NATO will not admit Ukraine to NATO, But only if Putin exits his military alliance with China. That Russia China alliance is the top threat that we face today. So do I trust Vladimir Putin? Of course not. Is Putin a great craven dictator? Absolutely, he is. But we will trust him to follow his self interest Just as he will trust us to follow ours. Because you asked a good question, I'm gonna go into this detail. Nixon did this in 1972. When he pulled Mao Zedong out of the USSR, that was a China Russia alliance back then. Did we trust Mao? Of course, we didn't. But there were kinks in that armor back then. There are kinks in that armor today in the Russia China relationship. Look, when Putin and and Xi Jinping met, Putin sends then weapons to India and Vietnam. That's sending a signal to China. China doesn't appreciate that. China wants to complete a railroad in northeast China to the ocean. Russia's not letting them. So if we look closely, there are kinks in that armor, but it's going to take a visionary leader who's gonna say, we're gonna use the Ukraine war as an opportunity To say to Russia, you know what? We'll reopen some economic relations with Russia as Nixon did with Mao. But we're gonna require no more joint military exercises, No more military sales between Russia and China. Weaken that alliance. That's the single most important thing the next president can do To reduce the risk of World War 3. And I want you to understand, I'm the only presidential candidate really talking about that Russia China alliance. Yet that is the single greatest threat we face to the United States of America today, and I do think it's going to take a leader coming from the outside of the existing foreign policy I'll remind you, the one that got us into the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan where thousands of our sons and daughters went to go die, Adding 7 trillion to our national debt 20 years later with the Taliban still in charge in Afghanistan and Iraq still a broken country. If that isn't a sign that we need fresh blood in our foreign policy establishment, I don't know what is. And so I think it's gonna take new leadership, and that's the deal that I would do. Speaker 0: Thank you. This Ukraine topic. I wanna follow-up. You wanna suspend support for Ukraine in this war and get the United States out of that conflict. Speaker 2: As part of this deal that I've laid out. Speaker 0: If Putin doesn't take you up on that deal, would you allow Putin to use force to take all of Ukraine if he wanted to? Speaker 2: So we're gonna do I think the deal we're gonna do now is actually gonna allow Ukraine to come out with its sovereignty intact, which is not even the path that Ukraine is on. Speaker 0: Does not take you up Speaker 2: on your deal, which So look. I'm not. Look. I'm convinced on my ability to negotiate. Speaker 0: Decided to use force to march into Kyiv, take all of Ukraine, Would you, as president of the United States, allow that to happen? Speaker 2: Abby, that I think is a fictitious scenario for a lot of reasons. Part of the reason Putin's been able to seize Eastern Ukraine is they have not had the same level of resistance as the rest of you. Speaker 0: How is it a fictitious scenario when Speaker 2: Because nobody has tried to do it and has failed to do it. Well And and so what I would say tried Speaker 0: to do it, I think, is the point I'm trying to make. Speaker 2: And he failed to do it because I think that this it's a fair question. Speaker 0: Because the United States backed Ukraine. Speaker 2: No. He failed to do it for a deeper reason. And now this This gets into some details in the Ukraine war, but if you wanna go there, I think we should go there, which is that the eastern regions of Ukraine, these are Russian speaking regions Where most of the people who live there don't even view themselves really as part of Ukraine. They have not been represented in the Ukrainian parliament For the better part of the last decade, almost the entire last decade, so there was no counterinsurgency or resistance. That's why Putin was successful in east Eastern Ukraine, but not the rest. So again, I come back to principles There are a lot of scenarios we we can't map out in advance, but the basic principles are this. Russia's in a military alliance with China. I'm gonna play hardball and require that Russia weaken or exit its military alliance with China. But we also have to stand by a few things that Commitments we've made that NATO should not actually admit Ukraine to NATO. We made that commitment. Gorbachev made it was made to Gorbachev by James Baker In 1990, we haven't kept that commitment. We should keep that commitment too. And I think that that level of diplomacy avoids us using I let's look at the alternative now, Abby. We're looking talking about sending another $61,000,000,000 to Ukraine. It is unclear to me or anybody else what the next 100,000,000,000 is gonna do That the first 100,000,000,000 didn't accomplish. And so I don't think throwing bad money after bad is gonna be the solution here. I do think diplomacy is the solution, But it's gonna take somebody who is committed to advancing US interests to get this done. Speaker 0: So my Speaker 2: foreign policy is avoid World War 3, declare independence from China, And then focus on securing our own homeland, which we're not talking about. Speaker 0: I wanna get back now to our audience member. We have a question now from Nicole Ryback. She's from Des Moines And as a college admissions counselor, she says that she's currently registered as a Democrat, but now intends to switch parties and is planning to participate in the Republican caucuses and register as a Republican. She's undecided on which candidate to support. Nicole? Speaker 5: Thank you and welcome. I'm gonna throw it back to the United States and talk a little bit about How you feel about the growing differential between the top 1% and the middle class in the US, and how you plan on addressing it in your presidency? Speaker 2: Great question. And to tell you the truth, I don't feel great about it. A lot of this is the product of the Federal Reserve, actually. Seems like a technical subject a lot of people don't like to talk about. I think this is fundamental. So the Federal Reserve has, since the late nineties, taken on the role of playing effectively god For the financial system, for a lot of that period, raining money from on high like mana from heaven. We've been skiing on artificial snow, and It's really flowed down through the top 1%. A friend of mine actually has a funny expression, but I'll share it with you. He says, you know, if you're a nurse, you'll go home with some extra latex gloves. You're a teacher, you might go home with some extra pencils. If you're a banker, you go home with a few extra dollars. And that's the way it's worked through the Federal Reserve System. Trickle down economics, I believe, does work when it's driven by gains in the real economy, but it doesn't work when it's created by artificial paper wealth generated by Fed Reserve policies. So I put the Fed back in its place. The reason real wage growth has not gone up for the bottom 99% adjusted for inflation. It's been flat. The reason why is the Federal Reserve has treated wage growth as though it's a leading indicator of inflation and try to tamp it down like a game of whack a mole for the last 25 years, so you get what you pay for. My view is I'll put the Fed back in its place. A single mandate for the US Fed. What is that? Dollar stability. Peg the dollar to commodities. That ties the hands of our government. That's a good thing. We had our greatest GDP growth in this country Before we left the gold standard. I think that's telling. So when the dollar is stable, that's how you actually help the bottom 99% in this country. That's how you see a real real wage growth. And I want people to understand, we you hear a lot of tales and mythology, I would say, about the current economy. Let's make it simple. What's going on? Prices are going up. Interest rates including mortgage rates to buy your home are going up, but wages have remained flat. And so I'm not gonna be the person who comes in here and tells you. Some people say am I too pessimistic at times? I'm a realist. I'm not gonna tell you the American dream is alive and well right now. It is not. It's alive and hanging on for life support, But I believe it can be. And I do think it's gonna take now more than ever a CEO in the White House. Somebody with fresh legs. Somebody, I believe, from the next generation to look at this differently, apply some basic economic common sense, and that starts with reform of the Federal Reserve. So thank Thank you for that question. Welcome to the Republican side. Speaker 0: Let me ask you, mister Ramaswamy. 2 years ago, you floated the idea to dramatically increase The inheritance tax up to 59%. You said then, we shouldn't allow people to become billionaires just by having rich parents. Would you push for that as president? Speaker 2: That's not part of my policy platform as president. One of the things people should know about me is that I'm not a standard candidate. I've written 3 books in the last 2 years. They're not candidate books. I said that I brought up Thomas Jefferson earlier. I admire him because he was one of the few truly intellectual presidents we've had. And so I like to explore ideas. One of the things that an 11th grade English teacher, missus Smith, taught me is that you don't really understand what you think unless you can offer the best Statement of an alternative view. And so that's what I did in my books. I wrote my book first book was Woke Inc, and I often joke. I agree with about 95% of what's in there. And so my view is this. What we really need is a 12% flat tax across the board. Ordinary income, capital gain, corporate, flatten it all out, And then here's how we get the money back for the system, end the crony est deductions. The deductions and the loopholes and the and the rebates That a lot of corporations, a lot of special interests have lobbied in. It's about $700,000,000,000 a year. Just the tax compliance costs. Just the out of pocket costs. Not even counting the time you spend Preparing your taxes. Give that back to the people. That's how we actually restore, again, a big part of our economy, grow our economy. That's the way I would do it. Speaker 0: You are it's It's probably no surprise to folks here. You're very wealthy. You've made a lot of money in your life. Speaker 2: So do Speaker 0: you do you want your wealth do you believe it should pass down to your children? Speaker 2: So that's a it's an important question, actually, and I want to speak on behalf of both my wife and I. My wife, Apoorva, she wanted to be here today. She's not here because she was treating cancer survivors at Ohio State's Hospital. That's where she's kept her full time job while we're going through this. And, know, in many cases, our health care system or I should call it our sick care system is so broken that she doesn't even get paid for many of the procedures she does to improve Patients' lives. That works for us because we are in the position that we're in. But I'll tell you this, we're spending immense amounts of our family's fortune On this campaign, we didn't inherit our wealth. But that's the inheritance we actually care about giving our kids. It's not a bunch of green pieces of paper. It is the country that allowed us to live the American dream that each of us did. My parents came to this country 40 years ago with no money. And, yes, in a single generation, I have gone on to found multiple multibillion dollar companies. Did it while marrying Apoorva who lived her American dream, raising our 2 sons, Following our faith in God. That is the American dream. That's the inheritance we care to give our kids. And even if you're just speaking really honestly and some people hit me for this, but I stand by it actually. I've gone to college with when I went I went to Harvard, And my dad was working at GE. He faced down layoffs under Jack Welch's tenure. We had a solidly middle class upbringing with some ups and downs along the way. I went to school with kids who were the kids of billionaires. That was new to me. I had never encountered that in my life until I got to Harvard College. And I'll tell you something, Abby. It's it's interesting. They weren't many of them weren't happier for it. To the contrary, I was actually able to follow my hunger and my passion and my ambition, Maybe even more freely than many of my other fellow peers. I'm grateful to other peers who may not have had access to basic education, But there are also those who don't have basic access to having their own ability to live the American dream because they're encumbered by that inheritance as well. So I'm not one of these guys who fetishizes Lavishing children with a bunch of wealth. I want to give them the country that allows them to live the American dream through meritocracy That allowed a poor Vinay to succeed as well. Speaker 0: I wanna go back to the audience. We have here Riley Miller. He's a law student at Drake University and a clerk In the Marion County attorney's office, he's a Republican who is currently undecided. Rylan? Speaker 4: Thank you. On the debate stage, you have somewhat abandoned, the tact and diplomacy that I would Look for in a president. I'm all for, keeping it real and dogging the establishment, but there's gravitas and, that I look for in those who represent our country. How do you see the balance between keeping it Being authentic and maintaining that presidential demeanor. Speaker 2: I appreciate the question. I think it's very candid. This is what I love about Iowa. I get tougher questions from you guys than I do from the media. That's and that's good. That's why we're here. So I I appreciate that. Look. Here's the standard I use for holding myself to or holding any president to. I want us to be able to look our kids in the eye and tell them that I want you to grow up and be like him. It's been a long time since we've held our presidents to that standard. That's the standard I want you to hold me to. That's a high standard. Now I think about that in judging the way that I comport myself in different areas. Am I gonna tell my kids to go to school and be a bully? No. I'm not. But I'm gonna tell them if somebody bullies you or hits you, you're gonna hit them back 10 times harder. And that's the way I'm gonna lead this country. You can't you have to be, As we say in our family, you have to be strong enough to protect your kindness. So if you watch those debates carefully, I don't engage in four letter words. Mean, there are other candidates who've called me dumb, scum, and worse that I'm not gonna repeat here. I didn't go after them, but if they're gonna come after me, I'm not gonna be a president, whether it's Xi Jinping or Vladimir Putin or anybody else Who's gonna roll over? When I'm leaving the United States, the same rule applies. If you hit us, we hit you back 10 times harder. But it's not for the sake of being a bully. It's for protecting our inner kindness too, and I think it's important that we have a president that has both of those attributes. I've done more podcasts probably than probably than most presidential candidates in history combined, mostly because podcasts are new. I'll admit that. But I will tell you, that's a different setting, and so I believe I think it's the book of Ecclesiastes that teaches, and my faith teaches me the same thing. There's a time and place for everything. There's a time and place for fortitude. There's a time and place for justice. There's a time and place for mercy. And I think it's going to take all of those attributes, Every last ounce of each of those attributes to stand for this country, to reunite this country, and revive who we are. You don't want a wilting flower in the White House, But you also want somebody who understands what we are fighting for. That's the standard I want you to hold us to. We will Aspire to hold ourselves too, and I think that sometimes being a parent is what gives me my moral clarity. And I hope through the rest of this campaign, we're just getting warmed up. I hope to be able to earn your trust that, yes, I do have what it takes to tell you the truth. I'm not going to hide the truth from you. You want someone who's gonna speak truth to power, vote for somebody who's gonna speak the truth to you, to the Republican Party. Do it unvarnished without sugarcoating, and I don't do much sugarcoating. But also somebody who, as you, I believe, want, can stand for the ideals that would make our founding fathers proud and would make our children proud as well. Speaker 0: Speaking speaking of those debates, let me ask you about something that you said at the debate last week. You used the phrase Inside job to describe what happened on January 6th. The next day, Capitol rioter, Alan Hostler, highlighted your comments at his sentencing. He is going to prison for 11 years. A a a hoster, threatened members of congress. He brought Hatchet, knives, pepper spray, sun batons, tactical gear to the US Capitol. Are you concerned that a convicted felon like that is now promoting your Comments in court. Speaker 2: So here's my concern, Abby. And I wanna tell you guys where I'm at. If you had told me It's close to 3 years ago that January 6, 2021 happened. If you had told me 3 years ago back when I was a biotech CEO, not steeped in this world. I was just consuming passive media, but was focused on my world of developing medicines. If you had told me that January 6th was in any way an inside job, the subject of government entrapment, I would have told you that was crazy talk. Fringe conspiracy theory nonsense. I could tell you now having gone somewhat deep in this, It's not. I mean, the reality is this. We do have a government. First of all, we have technology that has lied to us systematically over the last several years About the origin of COVID nineteen, about the Hunter Biden laptop that we were told was false by 51 CIA experts and otherwise before we now know that it was true. You can go straight down the list, the Trump Russia disinformation collusion hoax. All of it. Now we come to January 6th. The reality is we know that there were federal law enforcement agents in that field. We don't know how many. I think it's a shame if if I may finish just answering. Speaker 0: Well, let me just I I I'm gonna go ahead and interrupt here because Speaker 2: Because I noticed that there were doesn't approve it as best as I know. Speaker 6: There were federal agents. Be able to talk about this. Speaker 0: You're saying that there were federal Speaker 2: agents This is important to talk about. Speaker 0: Miss Muskogee, there were federal agents in the crowd on on on January 6th. Yep. There is no evidence that there were federal agents in the crowd On January 6th. Speaker 2: So why before congress when pressed on what the number was? They didn't say there were none. They just couldn't say there Speaker 0: were none. Saying that there's no that you have not seen evident any evidence So we've seen multiple And Speaker 2: so you've seen informants suggesting that they were we know people were we know people were FBI informants who were asking Speaker 6: Is there any evidence may Speaker 2: may just They just finished me, and I'll become that question. Speaker 0: Well, let me clarify. Speaker 2: I know it's very uncomfortable for you. Speaker 0: I'm gonna clarify my question. Uncomfortable issue for many Speaker 2: people, but we have to do the truth here. Speaker 0: I'm gonna clarify my because I wanna make sure that you understand what I meant. Speaker 2: I understand this deeply. And I told you, I was Where Speaker 0: 3 years ago. I'm with her now. The evidence Yes. Where is the evidence that the government Had applied to this. An inside job Speaker 2: But no. I'm not an inside job is. Speaker 6: I'm not Speaker 0: gonna I'm not violence on January 6th. Speaker 2: I'm not gonna let you put words in my mouth. I'm gonna put my words in my mouth, And I'm gonna tell you what what I Speaker 0: mean by that. Evidence that the government was involved Entrapment. Planning or executing January 6th. So I'm gonna Speaker 2: I'm gonna give you I'm gonna give you hard facts. And and if I may, Abby, I Why did they suppress footage of now what's been released? 200 hours of footage of shooting rubber bullets into that crowd. Shooting tear gas into that crowd. You didn't see that before. You saw what the response was to that. Now you see footage coming out of actually rolling out the red carpet For Capitol Police, allow Speaker 0: Mister Ramaswami again. Right through the front door. Vast majority I mean, how that cut out Speaker 2: evidence shouldn't have been released before, Speaker 0: Mister Ramformi, the dashboard footage shows Speaker 2: In my deeper question, yes. Speaker 0: Being overwhelmed. Violence Speaker 2: really important. Rioters. Speaker 0: That I'm Speaker 2: gonna give you a hard I'm gonna give you Speaker 0: some hard facts. Speaker 2: So what here's what entrapment cherry pick. I'm not cherry picking. Let let me finish that. Speaker 0: Let me finish that. Speaker 2: I'm not Speaker 0: cherry picking. Examples To Speaker 2: to the contrary. Speaker 0: The country Not a cherry pick example. Speaker 2: You know Speaker 0: cherry pick that is what happened. The government cherry Speaker 2: pick 12 hours of footage when there was 200 hours of the cherry picking was the government, not me. Release the whole thing. And let me let me just finish one thing too, because this is super important as a topic. So when you I think there's a civil libertarian issue of our time. When we first kidnapping. I wanna keep it going to be really clear on this because it's the same issue in the same FBI, same even part of the FBI. Three people who were in alleged plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer Were acquitted at the end of trial because it was entrapment. That is government agents put them up to do something they otherwise wouldn't have done. They give him credit cards With spending limits of up to $5,000, encourage them to buy munitions, plan something they weren't otherwise willing to plan. So much so, and I want people at home to know this, Especially CNN viewers to know this is that one of the jurors went to those defendants and apologized afterwards, gave him a hug, Apologize seeing what the government had put a poor guy up to who had to go to some Mexican restaurant across the street to get hot water. These people were exploited with credit cards up to $5,000, FBI agents putting them up to a kidnapping plot that we were told was true but was entrapment. Same thing with the Capitol Police. People letting you free money. Many of those people then Speaker 0: put charge. Tommy. Look. Speaker 2: The government cannot put you up to do something and then charge you for Speaker 0: your money. That's wrong. Don't wanna have to to the left of the fight I don't wanna have to interrupt you. I really don't. But I don't want you to mislead the audience here or at home. Speaker 2: I think they've been misled by mainstream media. Speaker 0: 14th people media has misled them. 14th people were charged in that plot. A majority of them were I said 3 of Speaker 2: them were acquitted on grounds of entrapment. What you what That's a fact. What folks Was I wrong Speaker 6: about that? Folks need Speaker 2: to understand. Wrong about what I said? What folks need Speaker 0: to understand 3 people were Speaker 2: acquitted on grounds of entrapment. Speaker 0: 9 were apologized. Were convicted. Speaker 2: But the 3 who were put up shot never Back to the move to Speaker 0: January 6th. Speaker 2: That's unacceptable in the United States. Speaker 0: Look, I I just want people to understand. 3 people were acquitted. 9 people were convicted in that plot. But let me get back to our audience here. Let's bring in Joe Freml. He's from Des Moines. He's a student at Drake, and he's a Republican who says that he supports whoever wins the nomination. Joe. Speaker 7: Man, thank you. I love seeing you get fired up. So Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you. Thanks. Good to see you, man. I see you're a basketball player. I've been playing tennis with some Drake tennis players. They got some good players. Speaker 7: Oh, yeah. Some of my boys play there, so it's awesome. Yeah. Speaker 2: The Speaker 7: Biggest question about your legitimacy as a candidate has been your age. You know, I was a 22 year old college kid. I love the idea of having younger candidates in office, but how has this been a challenge for you? Speaker 2: Yeah. Look, it's been a big challenge. I mean, frankly, most caucus goers are 3, 4 times your age. Let's be real about that. And I want people like you to come out to the caucus, and we're going to college campuses for that reason. One of the things I want people to understand, what I see when I go to college campuses, I think actually many Republican candidates are scared of facing off with your generation, actually. Some of them hit me for being on TikTok because it reaches you all. I think we should be reaching out to young voters. What I see isn't a base of young voters who's against our shared values. I see a lot of peers in your generation and our generation that are lost, Hungry for direction. Right? The left will prey on that vacuum with race, gender, sexuality, climate. I'm not gonna blame them. I'm gonna blame the Republican Party. We've gotten lazy just criticizing that vision without offering our own vision. Individual. Family. Nation. God. Yes. I said the cheat word. That beats race, gender, sexuality, and climate if we have the courage to actually stand for something. And so I believe that your generation, I believe that we're at a tipping point, and there's a reason. I you know, I've talked about Thomas Jefferson. He was 33 when he wrote the declaration. He also invented the swivel chair while he was at it. Think about that founding spirit. We're the pioneers. We're the Floors in this country. The unafraid. The people who nobody and no government dares to stop. That's who we are as Americans. Our pursuit of excellence, that's what makes us American. And I think it's going to take somebody in your generation. Somebody whose best days in life are still yet ahead. To see a country whose best days are still ahead of itself, and I I hope that's the case for me. I don't take every day for granted. Every day we wake up is a new blessing, and I'll leave it at that. I don't take tomorrow for granted, but I hope my best days are still ahead of me. And I think as a leader, I reject this narrative that we have to be that nation in decline, that we have to be ancient Rome. What's your name again, sir? Joe. Joe, I think our nation, like you, is actually A little young. Going through our own version of adolescence. Figuring out who we're gonna be when we grow up. And when you view it that way, it all makes sense again to me. It does. You go through that identity crisis. You lose your way a little bit. I don't know about you, but I did some stupid things. Right? But we're stronger for it when we get to our adulthood on the other side. So, no, I don't think we have to be that nation in decline and tell the people in your class the same thing. We can still be a nation in our ascent. If the people of the last 25 years got us to where we are, maybe we try something a little different. Somebody with fresh legs. Somebody may be the age that our founding fathers were when they signed that declaration. And I think we live in a 17/76 moment. Let's give that a try and see what happens. Thank you. Speaker 0: Alright. We've got much more ahead. We'll be right back with more from presidential candidate, Vivek Ramaswamy. Welcome back to Iowa at CNN Town call with Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswami. Let's turn to Jenny Mitchell. She is an entomologist at Iowa State University From Boone, Iowa, she is a Republican who is currently undecided. Ginny? Speaker 8: Thank you. Thanks for being here, and thanks for coming to Iowa so much. We appreciate your visits. So freedom of religion is a part of our constitution and, obviously, a huge part of our country. What do you say to those who say that you cannot be our president because your religion is not what our founding fathers based our country on? Speaker 2: I would say that I respectfully disagree, and, you know, I want people to understand this about me. I would rather speak the truth and lose an election than to win by playing some political snakes and ladders. I mean, if I wanted to map out my political career and really solve for that, you know, I could Fake convert. You know, I'm not gonna do that. I'm gonna tell you about my faith. I'm Hindu. Now I went to Christian schools. I went to St. Xavier in Cincinnati, And I actually have been on the board of SANEX, except for hiatus to run for president. And I can tell you with confidence that We share the same value set in common. I'll tell you about my faith. My faith teaches me that God puts each of us here for a purpose. That we have a moral duty to realize that purpose. That God works through us in different ways, But we're still equal because God resides in each of us. Now I had what you would call not a Traditional upbringing, but probably a very traditional upbringing. Right? My parents taught me family is the foundation. Marriage is sacred. Divorce isn't some option you just prefer off a menu when things don't go your way. Abstinence before marriage is the way to go. Adultery is wrong. That the good things in life involve a sacrifice. Now are those foreign values in this country? I know it could look that way at times. You turn on the television, go to the movie theater, your local DEI training at a company or what they're teaching your kids in schools. That could Seem a little unfamiliar. I don't think it's unfamiliar to most of us. I think those are the same Judeo Christian values that I learned at saint x, when we get to the Ten Commandments, what do they say? There's 1 true god. Don't take his name in vain. Observe the Sabbath. Respect your parents. Don't kill. Don't lie. Don't cheat. Don't steal. Don't commit adultery. Don't covet. That's when it hit me. We share the same value set in common. It's another core teaching in my faith, which is that we don't get to choose who God works through. God chooses who God works through. So we get to the Old Testament a little bit further along. We get to the book of Isaiah. I don't know if Many of you're familiar with with that one. God chose Cyrus, a Gentile all the way in Persia, To lead the Jewish people back to the promised land. And so, yes, I believe God put us here for a purpose. My faith is what leads me On this journey to run for president, my gratitude to this country is what leads me. And even when we think about the founding fathers, I'm a fan of history. Okay? I talked about Thomas Jefferson earlier. We'll stick to Thomas Jefferson. He was a deist, actually. Let's be honest about it, because the the left wants to rewrite our history and tell you he was Slave owner and evil man. No. I reject that. But we're not gonna have anybody rewriting our history. Thomas Jefferson was a deist. He made the Jefferson Bible. You know how he did it? He didn't believe in all the parts of the New Testament, but he took a blade, razor blade by hand, glued it together, and that made the Jefferson Bible, which we have today. John Adams wrote letters to Thomas Jefferson, actually became something of a Hindu scholar after he left. And so I think it's important to see our founding fathers three dimensionally, Not the way that they've been rewritten post 1990 either. And so, yes, do I would I be the best president to spread Christianity through this country? I would not. I'd be not the best choice for that, but I also don't think that that's the job of the US president. But will I Stand for the Judeo Christian values that this nation was founded on, that I was raised in, even in the Hindu faith. Yes, I will. You're darn right I will. And as a young person picking up on that strand from earlier, I think it's my responsibility to make faith And patriotism and family and hard work, cool again in this country. I think they're pretty cool and I think that's my job. As your next president and to back to the First Amendment, we will stand for religious liberty in a way that neither Republicans nor Democrats actually have. That's what the First Amendment says. You get to practice your faith. Every pastor in this country gets to do his job without the government getting in their way. That's what I'm gonna keep as a Speaker 0: Let me ask you about a little bit of news. The Supreme Court announced that it would hear a case, this term that could potentially restrict access nationwide to a widely used abortion drug called Mifepristone. You oppose abortion, but do you believe that the court should limit the distribution of this drug nationwide? Speaker 2: So I think this is a question. It's the job of the Supreme Court. Who would have ever thought to judge the law? This is a case about administrative law. Actually, this is less about the abortion question, and it's more about did the FDA exceed the scope of its statutory authority When it approved Mifepristone on an emergency basis, and these emergency approvals are generally reserved for life saving therapies that need to be brought to market Quickly. So this is a symptom, Abby, of what's going on in the administrative state. The people who we elect to run the government, They're not even the ones who actually run the government right now. It's the bureaucrats in those 3 letter agencies that are pulling the strings today. So the most important Supreme Court case of our lifetime, and I want people to understand this, came out last term. It's West Virginia versus EPA that said if Congress did not expressly give an agency the right To write a regulation, then that's unconstitutional. And so it is my opinion, it's the Supreme Court's that'll matter, but I'm pretty sure they're gonna come down where I where I am on this, That the FDA exceeded its statutory authority in using an emergency approval to approve something that doesn't fit Congress's criteria for what actually counts as an emergency approval. So, yes, I hope they follow the law. I hope that's where they come down. And if the people of this country disagree with that, we have a mechanism for that. It's called the democratic process. Do it through the front door of Congress. And there's 1 thing I'm gonna do as the next president. It's to shut down that 4th branch of government. Rescind those unconstitutional federal regulations that Congress never actually passed. And, yes, lay off 75% of the federal employee headcount. That's the Speaker 0: I wanna get to our question. But just before we do that, just so that everyone is clear, you do believe that the Supreme Court should Ban Mifepristone. Speaker 2: I believe that the Supreme Court should put the FDA back in its place. Speaker 0: That But as it relates Speaker 2: to this particular That's before the court. Speaker 0: But as it relates to Speaker 2: this should rule on the law. Speaker 0: It relates to this particular drug And as it relates to this particular drug And as it relates to this particular drug you believe that that will ultimately result in Mifepristone being banned nationwide? Speaker 2: I believe it will result in Mifepristone being taken off the market Until they go through the process that's ordained for every other drug that doesn't go through emergency approval. Okay. The FDA should follow the law if the rest of us do too. Simple thing to ask. Speaker 0: I do wanna go to our audience again. We've got Claire Musselman here waiting to ask a question. She's a professor at Drake University who teaches In the College of Business and Education, she's a Republican from West Des Moines who is undecided. Claire? Speaker 9: Thank you, Abby. Thank you also for spending time with our students at Drake. A professor, I think it's super important that we get that opportunity, so thank you for spending time with them. As president, what specific strategies would you implement to Promote diversity and inclusion in leadership roles within both public and private sectors. How do you plan to support the advancement of underrepresented groups, Including women in these areas. Speaker 2: So I'll be very honest with you. I'm gonna share with you Tom, a soul quote that stuck with If you care about somebody, you tell them the truth or at least what you believe. If you care about yourself, you tell them what they want to hear, and I'm I have a feeling I'm not gonna tell you what you want to hear on this one. So I think the diversity, equity, inclusion agenda has been abused. In the name of diversity, we have, at many of our universities, Totally sacrifice diversity of thought. In the name of equity, we've perpetuated a lot of inequity and inequality of opportunity through affirmative action and otherwise. In the name of inclusion, we've created a new culture of exclusion where certain points of view aren't welcome. So especially in a university setting, what do I care about? Diversity of viewpoint. This is important, actually. I think diversity of viewpoint is part of what this country was built on. Well, the best way to Foster diversity of viewpoint is to screen candidates for the diversity of their views, actually. Many look at the board members of many universities. You wanna go through their partisan affiliation. It's not Eightytwenty. It's gonna be like 90:10 in the other direction. That's completely at odds with the representation of this country. So do I value diversity of viewpoint? Absolutely. Do I think we're doing a good job of that? No. We're not. And it's not an accident. In the name of diversity, we've actually created a new culture of conformity. And so I think it's entirely possible to have a group of 10 people who look similar to one another, who have different views. I think it's entirely possible to have a group of 10 people look different from one another or who look the same as one another but have different views or look different from one another and have the same views. And so I think the best way to screen candidates for the diversity of their experiences Is to actually ask them about the diversity of their experiences. And I think the use of these racial and gender quota systems, I think I've actually created a new form of racism in the United States that otherwise would not have existed. It's sad to me. I mean, I've hired, Not because I was thinking about it consciously. Plenty of black women in different positions of authority in this campaign or other companies or whatever. And I can tell you it saddens me when people look at somebody who I hired on the basis of merit and say that they only got that job because of their race or Gender. That doesn't do anybody a favor. And so I think if we restore true meritocracy in this country and embrace true diversity of thought, chances are we're actually gonna have A bunch of different shades of melanin and a range of genders in different positions, but let it be not the goal. Let it just be a byproduct of selecting for people who are the best person for the job and especially in a university setting, diverse viewpoints as well. That's what Speaker 0: And that's a good place for us to pause. We'll be right back with more from presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswami. Welcome back to CNN's town hall with presidential The candidate, Vivek Ramaswami. Let's go straight to the audience. We've got Rhonda McCoy here. She's a retired French professor from West Des Moines. Rhonda is a Republican who is undecided in this primary. Rhonda? Speaker 10: Good evening. Thank you for being here. What is the most important For interesting thing you've learned about Iowans during your travel through the state. Speaker 2: I've learned a lot. I think Iowans I think one thing I share in common with Iowans is a level of candor, actually. Everybody everybody told me about Iowa nice. That's what I was told before I came here. What I've actually found is Iowa candor. And I appreciate that because that's the true form of nice. Know, we we did this is the 10th event we're doing today, actually. So we've done 10 events like this across the state, and I found that people Appreciate that. We're visiting they call the full Grassley. It's it goes all 99 counties. We're doing that times 2, actually, going in this in this year period. And it doesn't feel like work to me, actually. Feels like we're having open conversations. I find that they don't appreciate pre canned speeches, So I've mostly dispensed with that. Or if I'm gonna do it, I'll keep it to 2 to 5 minutes. I find that they actually appreciate and relish Open conversation and candor. I think that's one of the things that surprised me most. The other thing that I think that surprised me was Somebody told me this. We ran the, Des Moines turkey trot. We were here on Thanksgiving. And as I was running, somebody wished me good luck, and then she said, but you know how to spell luck. Right? And this is an expression I had learned from my parents a long time ago. She says, you spell it w o r k. And I said, you know what? That sounds like something that my parents taught me when I was little. But I think that that's also something that I found amongst Iowans is they value people who work hard because many of you do work hard. A culture of farmers. A culture of people who are business builders across the state. And I think that's something that we would do well to make a national value in this country again. Embrace hard work. Give us back our sense of purpose. That's how we revive this country. Thank you. Speaker 0: Alright. Well, a big thank you to our audience, and thank you to mister Ramaswami. Thank you. Thank you to our host here at Grandview University. C. Caitlin Collins is up next. Speaker 2: Thank you, guys. Speaker 5: Good evening. I'm Kalyn Collins here in New York. You have been watching a live CNN town hall with
LauraLoomer
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 3:30 PM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 4:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nikki Haley had Laura Loomer removed from her town hall event in Iowa, despite Loomer having confirmation of her tickets. Loomer criticizes Haley's ability to handle dictators if she can't handle her. Loomer accuses Haley of not supporting free speech and acting like a dictator by involving the police.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨🚨🚨 JUST IN: @NikkiHaley just called the cops on me and had me escorted out of her town hall in Iowa. I was literally just standing and her staff let me inside the event after they sent me confirmation of my tickets. @NikkiHaley wants to be President and talks a big talk about how she’s going to use her heels to put dictators in their place, but she is so triggered by my presence, she had 2 police remove me from her event. How does Nikki Haley plan on dealing with Putin and Xi if she can’t even handle Laura Loomer? Nikki Haley clearly doesn’t support free speech. For someone who likes to pretend to be anti-dictator, she sure is acting like a dictator by using the police to have women removed from her events. Way to enforce the concept of weaponized government on the 3 year anniversary of January 6, Nikki!

Video Transcript AI Summary
I saw a report about being asked to leave an event, but I don't understand why. I asked why I had to leave, and they said it's because it's private property. I don't get it. I asked if they worked for Nikki's campaign, but they didn't answer. I received an email and a text asking me to sign up for the event, so I don't understand what the problem is. I asked nicely, but they didn't have any answers for me. It felt like they were being anti-woman.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just saw this report. I don't know what's the problem that we're here for an event. Like, I'm just standing here. Speaker 1: Rescue will leave. Speaker 0: Can you just explain to me, like, why you're asking me to leave? Because they want you to leave. Why? Speaker 1: It's private property mess. Speaker 0: Private property mess. I'm not understanding here. Like, what's police? I don't understand, like, what's the issue? Have you worked for Nikki's campaign? Oh, the issue. Why I'm sitting here, you signed up for the event? I told you. That's all I was advised. You know, I'm asking what criminal premises is. You're What's the point of having Tom Hals if just gonna kick people out. We're supposed to be the 1st female president when she's kicking a woman out of her tonight. Speaker 1: I'm not here to answer questions. If you have any comments or Speaker 0: move. You guys you guys sent me an email. I got here text last, and it said to sign up for the event. So what is the issue? I'm asking you nicely. Well, I think I'm asking pretty nicely as well. And I Speaker 1: don't have answers for you. I'm sorry. Okay. I just got Speaker 0: late. Anti woman.
allenanalysis
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 5:11 PM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
At a recent town hall, Laura Loomer was escorted out by police at Nikki Haley's request, despite having confirmed tickets. This incident raises questions about Haley's approach to dissent and free speech, and how she would handle global leaders like Putin and Xi. It highlights conflicts within the GOP and raises concerns about unity and leadership in facing national and global challenges. Loomer suggests a disconnect between Haley's rhetoric and actions regarding dictatorial behavior.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Laura Loomer recently reported a tense incident at a .@NikkiHaley town hall in Iowa. If they can't unite, how will they unite the nation? Despite having confirmed tickets and merely standing at the event, Loomer was escorted out by police at Haley's behest. This move by Haley, who aspires to the presidency and often speaks of challenging dictators with resolve, raises questions about her approach to dissent and free speech. Loomer provocatively asks how Haley would handle global leaders like Putin and Xi when she seemingly struggles with internal GOP dissent. This incident not only highlights conflicts within the GOP but also raises broader concerns about unity and leadership in facing national and global challenges, especially on significant anniversaries like that of January 6th. .@LauraLoomer suggests that Haley's actions contradict her public stance against dictatorial behavior, pointing to a disconnect between her rhetoric and actions.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 is confused about why they are being asked to leave a presidential campaign event. Speaker 0 explains that it is because they are on private property. Speaker 1 questions why they are being kicked out if they work for Nikki's campaign and were told to sign up for the event. Speaker 0 refuses to answer questions and asks Speaker 1 to leave. Speaker 1 insists that they received an email and text instructing them to sign up for the event. Speaker 2 also asks Speaker 1 to leave, but Speaker 1 argues that they are asking nicely too. Speaker 0 reiterates that they don't have answers and that Speaker 1 must leave the premises.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Josie, I saw this reference. Speaker 1: I don't know. What's the problem that we're here for an event? Like, I'm just standing here. Let's do the lead. Thank you. Guys so much. Presidential campaign event. Right? Can you just explain to me, like, why you're asking me Speaker 0: to leave? Because they want you to leave. Why? It's private propertyness. Speaker 1: Private propertyness. Private property. Standing here. Like, what's the issue? Speaker 0: You please gather your things and Speaker 1: you please I don't understand. Like, what's the issue if you work for Nikki's campaign? Oh, Nikki. Why I'm sending her to sign up for the event? I told you. Calls that you're just gonna kick me out. So Michael be the 1st female president when she's kicking a woman out of here tonight. Speaker 0: I'm not here to answer questions. Speaker 1: If you Speaker 0: have any comments or turns, you can contact them. Speaker 1: Well, I I'm here to do security, so please leave. You guys you guys sent me an email. I got here text last, and it says to sign up for the event. So what is the issue? Speaker 2: I'm asking nice of Speaker 1: you. Well, I think I'm asking pretty nicely as well. Speaker 0: And I don't have answers for you. I'm sorry. Speaker 2: I just got advised Speaker 0: that you must leave a premises. That's right. So
LauraLoomer
Posted - January 11, 2024 at 10:39 PM
Saved - January 12, 2024 at 10:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nikki Haley's campaign staff allegedly assaulted a National Guardsman for filming at her campaign event in Iowa. Valentina and her brother were also removed from the event after asking Haley about her military contract client list. Valentina is running for Secretary of State in Missouri and is an avid viewer of LoomerUnleashed. The incident has raised concerns about Haley's campaign being too scripted and insulated.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

SCOOP: @NikkiHaley’s campaign staff physically assaulted a Missouri National Guardsman at her Presidential campaign event in Ankeny, Iowa this morning for simply filming. @ValentinaForSOS and her brother were both removed from @NikkiHaley’s campaign event in Ankeny, Iowa (even though they both had Tickets) after Valentina’s brother tried recording His sister asking Haley “are you going to release your military contract client list?” Valentina is running for Secretary of State in Missouri. She and her brother were both at my Trump Town Hall Watch Party last night and are Avid viewers of @LoomerUnleashed. Great work, @ValentinaForSOS! Shame on @NikkiHaley’s campaign for assaulting a National Guardsman over filming. Nikki Haley is the most insulated Presidential candidate ever. Her staff literally want everything to be scripted!!!!

@ValentinaForSOS - Valentina Gomez

I was forcibly removed with my military brother from @NikkiHaley ’s event after I asked a question. Corrupt Nikki Haley cannot answer unscripted questions, even less handle our nuclear codes. America, @realDonaldTrump is our only solution. Part 2 coming soon. @LoomerUnleashed @LauraLoomer

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker and another person are having a conversation about not being able to take a video. The speaker asks why they can't take a video and the other person tells them they are not allowed. The speaker insists they are already there and asks again why they can't take a video. The conversation becomes heated and the other person asks the speaker to leave, accusing them of forcing their way in. The speaker is then asked to leave again and the conversation ends abruptly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Great. I'm watching. How are you? Yeah. We're not doing videos. We are. Excuse me. We're not doing videos. I did. Come on. Yo. Yo. Hey. Oh, why Why can't I take a video? Why can't I take a video? Yeah. Yeah. Why can't I take a video? No, sir. I am already Wait, but tell me why I can't take a video. He's here. He hasn't been on the roof. Thank you. Goodbye. Goodbye. Why am I being removed? You forced your way in. I didn't force my way in. Yeah. You did. Thank you. You forced your way in. Please leave. Thank you. Vicky It's quarted out.
LauraLoomer
Posted - January 12, 2024 at 11:02 PM
Saved - January 13, 2024 at 3:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ron DeSantis was confronted by the author at his hotel in Iowa. DeSantis hid inside the hotel convenience store and used his staff to block the author. The author questioned DeSantis about endorsing Trump, being an absentee governor, and his low polling numbers. The author called out DeSantis for being disloyal to Trump. DeSantis appeared scared when he saw the author. #LOOMERED #IowaCaucus

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

MUST WATCH: 🚨RON DESANTIS GOT LOOMERED INSIDE HIS HOTEL IN IOWA🚨 .@RonDeSantis Ron DeSantis just got LOOMERED at his hotel in Des Moines, Iowa, 3 days before the Iowa Caucus! I confronted DeSantis as he was walking into his hotel, and he hid from me inside the hotel convenience store and used his staffers, including @Kelly_Kundinger, to physically block my body. His staff also shoved me and tugged on my clothing so that DeSantis could get away from me and run into an elevator. But, I didn’t back down!!!!! I asked DeSanctus if he plans on endorsing President Trump when DeSantis loses the Iowa Caucus on Monday, January 15, 2024. I asked him why he is an ABSENTEE GOVERNOR who unethically changed the law in Florida so he could run for President on taxpayer dime and keep his Gubernatorial salary while he abandoned Floridians during multiple storms and an insurance crisis. I asked him why he is ALWAYS backing down even though his PAC is named @NvrBackDown24. I also asked DeSantis when he’s going to drop out of the 2024 Presidential race since he’s polling at 14% in Iowa, and 5% in New Hampshire. RON DESANTIS RAN AWAY FROM ME AND HE WAS PETRIFIED TO SEE ME! And of course, I called @GovRonDeSantis out for being DISLOYAL to the one man he owes his entire political career to: PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP! DeSanctimonious’s soul literally left his cowardly body when he saw me. It’s over Ron! You just got LOOMERED! #LOOMERED #IowaCaucus

Video Transcript AI Summary
Governor DeSantis is confronted by a journalist who asks when he will drop out of the race and accuses him of wasting money. The journalist also questions DeSantis about his campaign strategy and whether he will endorse President Trump. The journalist criticizes DeSantis for being absent during a state of emergency in Florida and accuses him of betraying Trump and the people of Florida. The journalist claims that DeSantis is scared to face independent journalists and predicts that he will lose to Trump in Iowa. The journalist concludes by saying that DeSantis has ruined his political career.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm recording. Okay. Thank you. Speaker 1: Hey, governor. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: When are you gonna drop out? Don't you think you've already wasted enough of people's money? 300 $1,000,000. Governor DeSantis, why do you have a bubble wrapped campaign, Ron? Are you going to be endorsing president Trump when you drop out the night of the Iowa caucus or hopefully shortly after? An absentee governor who changed the law in Florida so that you could run for president. Answer a question, Ron. I thought you Speaker 0: would never back down. Never back Speaker 1: down, Ron. Whatever happened to that? Don't assault me. Press charges against you. Speaker 0: There's a state of emergency in your state. Why aren't you there? Speaker 1: There's a state of emergency in the state of Florida that you declared into a Van Dyke Floridian truck. Speaker 0: Why are you getting me? Why are you getting me? You wouldn't be governor if Speaker 1: it wasn't for president Trump. You betrayed president Trump. You betrayed the people of Florida, and you're gonna lose 14% in Iowa, 5% in New Hampshire, Ron. Speaker 0: As you can see And of course. It's all the Speaker 1: way throughout backing down with Ron DeSantis. Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. So I'm here Speaker 1: in front of the Sheraton Hotel in West Des Moines, Iowa Speaker 0: and Ron DeSantis, Kescott, Hoover. He Speaker 1: looks petrified. Honestly, I think that his soul left his body when he saw me, and he's such a coward. Whatever happened to never backed out. Right? Never backed out. He ran And into the hotel convenience lobby. You know where they sell the little snacks in the waters and the tampons and things like that? That's why Ron DeSantis ran to hide from me, and then he took the elevator up to the 9th floor to run away from me. This is a guy who is too scared Speaker 0: to face an independent journalist. I'm recording. Pennant journalist, I'm Laurel Loomer. Speaker 1: He's running a bubble wrap insulated campaign campaign. Doesn't wanna talked to the people, and he runs away. He's gonna lose. President Trump's gonna kick his ass in Iowa On Monday, January 15th. And that's it for Ron. You killed your political career, Ron, and I hope you're happy. You just got rumored, bitch.
w_terrence
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 12:01 AM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 12:23 AM

@w_terrence - Terrence K. Williams

🚨 JUST IN: Nikki Haley is claiming she was teased and bullied for being a "brown girl" "I was teased every day for being brown" If Nikki Haley is a brown woman then I’m a White Man with blue eyes and blond hair . Who else is laughing at this joker 🖐️ https://t.co/931FM7tEIM

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were the only Indian family in our small southern town. I was teased for being brown. Speaker 1 challenges this, saying they were the only white family in Compton, California. They argue about what it means to be brown, with Speaker 1 saying Nikki is not brown because she has blonde hair. Speaker 1 also questions Nikki's ability to become president because she doesn't know her own color.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were the only Indian family in our small southern town. I was teased every day for being brown. So anyone that wants to question it can go back and look at what I've said on how hard it was to grow up in the deep south as a brown girl. Speaker 1: A brown where? A brown what? Girl, Okay. If that's the case, we were the only white family in Compton, California. Nikki, I'm brown. I'm black. Nikki, these blondes, Those are brown. You ain't brown, Nikki. What the? Becky, you color blonde. You can't be the president of the United States. You don't even know what color you are. You ain't brown, baby girl.
CollinRugg
Posted - January 22, 2024 at 12:16 AM
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 12:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nikki Haley alleges experiencing racism, stating she was mocked for her race and disqualified from a beauty pageant due to not fitting into a specific racial category. She claims to understand the difficulties and suffering caused by racism.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Nikki Haley is not only playing the ‘woman’ card, but is now playing the race card, says she was made fun of every day for being brown. Haley also claimed she was ‘disqualified’ from a beauty pageant because she wasn’t white or black. “If you wanna know what it was like growing up, I was disqualified from a beauty pageant because I wasn't white or black because they didn't know where to put me.” “So look, I know the hardships, the pain that come with racism.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I grew up as the only Indian family in a small southern town and faced daily teasing for being brown. I have a record of standing up against racism, such as advocating for body cameras after Walter Scott's shooting and calling for the removal of the Confederate flag after the Mother Emanuel Church shooting. I take pride in having friends from different races. I faced discrimination when I was disqualified from a beauty pageant because they didn't know where to place me. I understand the pain of racism and fight against it every day. If I didn't mention slavery, it's because it's a well-known part of the Civil War.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were the only Indian family in our small southern town. I was teased every day for being brown. So anyone that wants to question it can go back and look at what I've said on how hard it was to grow up in the deep South as a brown girl. Anybody can look at my record and see when Walter Scott was shot down by a dirty cop, how I made sure that the Walter Scott family didn't suffer because we put the 1st body camera bill in the country in place. Anybody can look at the fact that when we had 9 amazing souls die in Mother Emanuel Church, I did something that no Republican or Democrat ever wanted to touch, which was call for the Confederate flag to come down because it would take 2 thirds of the house and senate and was an impossible feat. I don't know what you're Fine with that, but what I will tell you is saying that I had black friends is a source of pride. Saying that I had white friends is a source the pride. If you wanna know what it was like growing up, I was disqualified from a beauty pageant because I wasn't white or black because they didn't know where to put me. So, look, I know the hardships, the pain that come with racism. It's the reason that I fight bullies every day when it comes to racism, anti Semitism, or hate, and I always will. If I didn't mention slavery on that day, it's because that's an automatic. There's always been the Civil War's always been known about slavery.
LauraLoomer
Posted - January 23, 2024 at 12:06 AM
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 3:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended Dean Phillips' campaign town hall in Manchester, NH, but was asked to leave before I could ask about the DNC rigging the primary. Despite his signs saying "Everyone's Invited," I was banned for trying to highlight the issue. It's hypocritical considering he encouraged Trump supporters to attend. The staff's treatment was anti-free speech and they missed an opportunity to promote their message.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I went to Democrat Presidential candidate @deanbphillips’s campaign town hall “rally” in Manchester, NH tonight. I wanted to ask about the @DNC rigging the Democrat primary, and I also wanted to ask Dean how many votes he thinks Democrat Presidential candidate @NikkiHaley is going to take away from him tomorrow after @BarackObama’s campaign manager @davidplouffe told Democrats and Democrat donors like @reidhoffman to vote for @NikkiHaley and to donate to her campaign. I was originally allowed inside, and then the staff told me “it’s the night before the NH primary election, we know who you are, and we have tons of media here. We just can’t risk you being on camera here or asking an embarrassing question.” And then I was asked to leave… Dean, how can your signs say “Everyone’s Invited”, and then you ban me from your event for trying to highlight the DNC rigging elections by threatening state Democrat Parties that allow for other candidates aside from @JoeBiden to be on the ballot? I wanted to ask you about those weirdos in the Write in Biden campaign… I saw you at the Trump rally in Rochester, NH last night, and you told Trump supporters to show up to your event tonight. Trump even gave you a shoutout at his New Hampshire rally the other night! Seems a bit hypocritical of you to allow your staff to treat me this way when I was respectful. Your staff are anti-free speech. You just missed a huge opportunity to get your message out because you don’t even believe in your own campaign sign slogan. “Everyone’s Welcome”. Yah… Except Laura Loomer. @mtracey witnessed this whole thing. They even cornered him and asked him “are you with HER”? A very Hillary Clinton-esque question if i may say so, myself.

LauraLoomer
Posted - January 23, 2024 at 2:50 AM
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 3:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended @marwilliamson's campaign event at Heartsong Energy Healing in Hooksett, NH. I asked her about the DNC's interference in the NH primary, losing Democrat votes to @NikkiHaley, and her stance on removing Trump from the ballot. She was nice, attendees were pleasant. Videos coming soon!

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

WOW! @marwilliamson held a campaign event at Heartsong Energy Healing in Hooksett, New Hampshire tonight. I wanted to cover the DNC led election interference in the Democrat Primary in New Hampshire where the @NHDems were threatened if they allowed for other candidates other than Joe Biden to be on the ballot after Biden chose to not be on the New Hampshire ballot. After I got major bad vibes and negative energy at the @deanbphillips event in Manchester, NH tonight, I went to ask Marianne the same question I wanted to ask Dean. She was very nice, she allowed me to stay, she took a photo with me, and her attendees were very pleasant. I asked her how many Democrat votes she expects to lose from Democrat Presidential candidate @NikkiHaley tomorrow in the New Hampshire primary after @BarackObama’s campaign manager @davidplouffe told Democrats and Democrat donors like @reidhoffman to vote for @NikkiHaley and to donate to her campaign instead of Democrats. I also asked her how she feels about the @DNC rigging the Democrat primary and if she opposes efforts to remove Donald Trump from the ballot in states across the country. I also asked her how she feels about @JoeBiden calling MAGA voters “domestic violent extremists”, if she would release non violent J6ers, and if Biden’s demonization of half the country as “DOMESTIC VIOLENT EXTREMISTS” is “good vibes” for the country. Never thought I’d end up in an energy healing center in snowy New Hampshire with @marwilliamson. I am a Trump supporter, but I can say that Marianne Williamson truly believes in free speech. It’s time for Dean Phillips to rip up his “Everyone’s Invited” campaign signs. Videos coming soon!

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I went to Democrat Presidential candidate @deanbphillips’s campaign town hall “rally” in Manchester, NH tonight. I wanted to ask about the @DNC rigging the Democrat primary, and I also wanted to ask Dean how many votes he thinks Democrat Presidential candidate @NikkiHaley is going to take away from him tomorrow after @BarackObama’s campaign manager @davidplouffe told Democrats and Democrat donors like @reidhoffman to vote for @NikkiHaley and to donate to her campaign. I was originally allowed inside, and then the staff told me “it’s the night before the NH primary election, we know who you are, and we have tons of media here. We just can’t risk you being on camera here or asking an embarrassing question.” And then I was asked to leave… Dean, how can your signs say “Everyone’s Invited”, and then you ban me from your event for trying to highlight the DNC rigging elections by threatening state Democrat Parties that allow for other candidates aside from @JoeBiden to be on the ballot? I wanted to ask you about those weirdos in the Write in Biden campaign… I saw you at the Trump rally in Rochester, NH last night, and you told Trump supporters to show up to your event tonight. Trump even gave you a shoutout at his New Hampshire rally the other night! Seems a bit hypocritical of you to allow your staff to treat me this way when I was respectful. Your staff are anti-free speech. You just missed a huge opportunity to get your message out because you don’t even believe in your own campaign sign slogan. “Everyone’s Welcome”. Yah… Except Laura Loomer. @mtracey witnessed this whole thing. They even cornered him and asked him “are you with HER”? A very Hillary Clinton-esque question if i may say so, myself.

LauraLoomer
Posted - January 27, 2024 at 5:01 PM
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 10:02 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Did you know that @NikkiHaley’s brother @MittiRandhawa is the Federal Government Account Director of Johnson and Johnson @JNJNews? How much would someone in that role make in kickbacks from Big Pharma if their sister was in the White House? The more you know. https://t.co/sIY7QqZZA5

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

EXCLUSIVE: I have located the Instagram account of @NikkiHaley’s older brother Mitti Randhawa and have discovered that he is making violent threats against former GOP Presidential candidate and current Trump surrogate @VivekGRamaswamy! In an Instagram Post from November 8, 2023, Mitti made derogatory comments about Vivek’s name, and he also said, “you attack any member of my family, you attack ME! I will take you on any day, you SCUM!!! Bring it!!!! Don’t go there!” This is a direct threat of physical violence against Vivek by Nikki Haley’s brother, who is on the campaign trail with her according to his Instagram pictures, which I have archived. He was with Nikki in Iowa for the Iowa Caucus. Why is Nikki Haley campaigning with her unhinged brother who is making physical threats against Vivek? Her brother is clearly unhinged, which you will see if you read his social media posts… Even if he locks his account, I have all the screenshots! RECEIPTS! 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

GlockfordFiles
Posted - January 29, 2024 at 2:38 PM
Saved - January 29, 2024 at 3:53 PM

@GlockfordFiles - Glockford Files

Just like her Uniparty cult friends Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton, Nikki Haley has no problem lying straight to people’s faces. Pass it on. https://t.co/DGE9Jb8CtK

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will not support raising the gas tax, but let's increase it by 10¢ over 3 years. I'm Nikki Haley and I'm running for president. Everyone on social media should be verified by their real names. I never said the government should force people to pay. The retirement age of 65 is too low and needs to be increased. I never claimed that Hillary Clinton was an inspiration. I attended a leadership program where she spoke and decided to pursue a political career.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we will get them. But I will not, not now, not ever support raising the gas tax. Finally, let's increase the gas tax by 10¢ over the next 3 years. I would not run if president Trump ran. I'm Nikki Haley, and I'm running for president. Every person on social media should be verified by their name. I never said government should go and require anyone to pay. But what we do know is 65 is way too low, And we need to increase that. To claim in the retirement age is, quote, way, way too low. I have never once said that. I never said Hillary Clinton was an inspiration. I went with my friend Eleanor Kitsman to a firm and leadership program where Hillary Clinton was speaking, and I walked out of there and I said, I'm going to office.
GlockfordFiles
Posted - February 6, 2024 at 3:18 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 8:53 PM

@GlockfordFiles - Glockford Files

Nikki Haley is standing with Mitch McConnell, Liz Cheney, Joe Biden and all of the other uniparty cult members in favor of this America last “border security” bill. A vote for Nikki Haley is a vote for the uniparty cult. https://t.co/8L0X2mgQdG

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a Democrat trap that would end a Republican's career. It's a foolish bill that should not be signed. It involves massive amounts of money, billions and billions of dollars, going out of town. The situation at the border is extremely bad, one of the worst I've seen. Overall, this bill is one of the dumbest I've ever seen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's hard to believe because I think it probably would mean the end of their career. This is a, a democrat trap. It's a trap for republicans that would be so stupid, so foolish to sign a bill like this. This bill can't be signed. And it's not only that. It's massive amounts of money going out of town, as we say. Going out of town. 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 of dollars. And, it's so bad on the border. I've never seen anything like it. Actually, it's one of the worst one of the dumbest bills I've ever seen. I think it's
Elex_Michaelson
Posted - February 7, 2024 at 8:37 PM
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 11:20 PM

@Elex_Michaelson - Elex Michaelson

NEWS: @NikkiHaley responds to losing the Nevada GOP primary to "none of these candidates:" She tells me NV's system was a "scam" that was "rigged from the start." There were no delegates at stake so she didn't "spend a day or a dollar there." Via @TheIssueIsShow https://t.co/L5wxTHaEqO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nevada is seen as a scam because Trump rigged the primary and it was not worth their time. Their focus is on South Carolina, Michigan, and Super Tuesday. Republicans lost important votes on the border and Israel, and Trump's involvement in various court cases is causing chaos. The Republican party needs to change and not respond to Democrat chaos with more chaos.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Does that situation in Nevada hurt a little bit? No. I mean, Nevada, it's such a scam. They were supposed to have a primary. Trump rigged it so that the GOP chairman, who's been indicted, would go and create a caucus. We knew months ago that we weren't gonna spend a day or a dollar in Nevada because it wasn't worth it. Mhmm. And so we didn't even count Nevada. That wasn't anything we were looking at. We knew that it was rigged from the start. Sure. Our focus is on South Carolina, Michigan Super Tuesday. So if you look what we did in Iowa and you look what we did in New Hampshire, we're continuing to grow. That's what matters, I think, more than anything else. But look at what happened this week. Here you have Republicans lost a major vote on the border. Mhmm. Republicans lost a major vote on Israel. Donald Trump was found that he will not have immunity in all of these Court case is coming up. The RNC chair is fired. Mhmm. All of this chaos is happening around us and Donald Trump's fingerprints are on every bit of it. We can't continue as the Republican party to go forward with this chaos. You don't defeat Democrat chaos with Republican chaos, and that's why we've gotta see a change.
LauraLoomer
Posted - July 15, 2024 at 1:32 PM
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 9:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nikki Haley's attendance at the RNC Convention was uncertain, but she was announced as a speaker shortly before Trump's rally incident. Trump did not invite her to speak initially.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

What are the chances Nikki Haley @NikkiHaley gets booed off stage at the RNC Convention… which she wasn’t attending… but then was announced as attending 30 minutes before Trump got shot in Pennsylvania. Thought she wasn’t going? Donald Trump did not invite Nikki Haley to speak at the RNC. She was announced as a speaker less than 30 minutes before he was shot at his rally.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 MUST SEE Want to see something really interesting? Nikki Haley was never invited to the RNC and didn’t have plans to attend before this week. The media is lying and saying Nikki Haley was invited to the RNC as a show of unity AFTER President Trump was shot. That is a LIE. The news that @NikkiHaley is now invited to speak at the RNC broke on July 13th at 5:42 pm. Donald Trump was shot at his rally at 6:11 pm on July 13th. Do you remember when @VivekGRamaswamy posted this tweet below? In January, I interviewed Vivek on my show @LoomerUnleashed. He told me: "I think the nearer term game is they're going to take a shot at trying to make this a two horse race between Donald Trump and @NikkiHaley.” Very interesting to say the least. See Receipts and Watch clip of interview below! 👇🏻

Chicago1Ray
Posted - October 22, 2024 at 12:02 PM
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 3:51 AM

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

@realDonaldTrump Kamala kicked Christians out of her rally in Wisconsin, for saying Jesus is Lord and Christ is King You guys are at the wrong rally.... Watch how Luke Polaake and Grant Beth describe their harrowing experience Christians need to get to the polls and vote their conscience https://t.co/Y09cjFIXbN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris allegedly ejected individuals from a rally for disagreeing with her on abortion rights or expressing Christian beliefs. According to one individual, Harris waved and smirked at him after he held up a cross while being asked to leave. He had yelled out to the crowd that abortion is the sacrament of Satan. Two young men, Luke Pulaski and Grant Beth, who proclaimed "Christ is King, Jesus is Lord" at the rally, were interviewed about the incident. It is claimed that Harris intentionally alienated people who disagree with her views on abortion. It is also claimed that a Kamala Harris presidency would alienate over 50% of the US population that is Christian.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kamala Harris is trying to shrink the tent by kicking people out of her rallies because they disagree with her on abortion rights. Speaker 1: Or Jesus. Speaker 0: Or Jesus. Exactly. Either way, at the very least, on abortion rights. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Listen to this. Speaker 1: We remember Donald Trump hand selected 3 members of Speaker 2: the United States Supreme Court with Speaker 1: with the intention that they would undo the protections of Roe v Wade, and they did as he intended. Oh, you guys are at the wrong rally. No. I think you meant to go to the smaller one down the street. That's the brat girl coming out. Pretty big moment. Speaker 3: So earlier today, we had those 2 young men, Luke Pulaski and Grant Beth, those you just heard in that rally, those who yield Christ is king, Jesus is lord. Earlier we had them on Fox and Prince. Speaker 4: I'm sure she talked about overturning Roe v Wade and Donald Trump. I yelled out to the crowd that abortion is the sacrament of Satan. And when I said that, I deeply do believe that as a Christian. And about 10 seconds go by, and that's when the video of, my friend Grant and I, proclaiming that Christ is Lord and Jesus is King. See on the video, she waves she waves. She was actually waving to me. I, took this cross off my neck that I wear, and as we were getting asked to leave, I held it up in the air and waved at her and pointed to her. She looked directly in the eye, kinda gave me an evil smirk. Speaker 5: This is what you are gonna get with a Kamala Harris presidency. You are going to get the Kamala Harris that alienates over 50% of the US population that is Christian.
bennyjohnson
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 3:59 PM
Saved - November 3, 2024 at 1:57 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨 Kamala Harris Campaign just called the cops on an independent journalist for posting photos of a poorly-attended Kamala Harris ‘rally’ However, it was easy to find me because there were only 150 people there. Kamala really does not want you to see this… https://t.co/ZBBI9NFt5y

Video Transcript AI Summary
We just got kicked out of a Kamala rally in Tampa. We’re both local voters and had invites, but as soon as we entered, staffers swarmed us and called the cops. We weren’t causing any trouble. This is supposed to be a party that values free speech and diversity, yet they couldn’t tolerate our presence. The event was barely half full, and they clearly needed more attendees. It’s ironic that they claim to support openness while acting like this. The staffers seemed nervous and took photos of us instead of engaging. That was our brief experience at the Kamala event today.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yo. So we just got kicked out of a Kamala rally here in Tampa. Live in Tampa. We're doing nothing. We're doing nothing. We're both Tampa. We're both Tampa voters, Tampa taxpayers. We got invited, and we walked inside. We weren't harm with anyone. But as soon as we walked inside and the staffers we have invites and everything. As soon as we walked inside, staffers, like, swarm us. Right? Start harassing us and then call the cops on us. We were doing nothing. This is your party of free speech. This is your party of freedom and liberty and diversity. This is your part of a party of open mindedness. Yeah. Got it. By the way, sucks to be them because the room is not even close to half filled for Hillary Clinton here, official Kamala event. There was a graveyard in there, and so they needed the bodies actually. They should have been smart and just let us let us be because they needed the actual bodies, but they couldn't tolerate our presence. You wanna know what real fascism is? You wanna know what actual true soy boy beta cuck low t energy is. It's still, like, sniveling, shaking, little staffers that are running around. They love the cops when they wanna kick us out. And then they've been done they've been doing nothing but taking photos of us from here. So we walked up to the window to give them a good shot. Anyway, that's our that's our 5 minutes inside of a Kamala event today. The party of freedom.
JakeLangJ6
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Saved - February 21, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@JakeLangJ6 - Jake Lang - January 6 Political Prisoner 🇺🇸

OUTRAGEOUS!!!! @IsaacTh25701465 22 year old January 6 Political Prisoner - Isaac Thomas VIOLENTLY ASSAULTED by CPAC Security!! Simply for being a good patriot and standing by me as I was thrown out AGAIN!! 😡😡😡 BOYCOTT CPAC 🪓 https://t.co/RFRf0jwI4i

Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, here we go. An officer just assaulted that young man. I'm pretty sure of it. This is actually happening at CPAC. This is how they're treating J6ers. It's unbelievable. They just threw a bunch out again. Here they are. Look, there's Koi. Look here. Here's Jake. Here's Koi. I just got this all worked out for them to be here, and they assaulted this young man in the process. I got it on video. I have it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here we go again. Okay. That officer just assaulted that young man. I'm pretty sure. Yeah. This is actually CPAC. This is how they're treating j sixers. It's incredible. This is unbelievable. They just threw a bunch out again. Here they are. Look. There's Koi. Look. Look here. Here they are. Look. This here. So here's Jake. Here's Koi. I've just got this all worked out for them to be here, and they assaulted this young man in the process. I got it on video. I have it. I've got it, sir. Yeah. Okay. I here we go again.
LauraLoomer
Posted - March 27, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 4:36 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

How come none of the Congressional Reps asked @npr today during the House hearing about why the NPR White House reporter hit President Trump in the face with a microphone? Such a missed opportunity.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨SCOOP🚨 I have identified the reporter who hit President @realDonaldTrump in the face with a boom mic this week while he was speaking to the press on the tarmac. Her name is Danielle Kurtzleben @titonka. She is the newly appointed White House reporter for @NPR and a massive Trump hater and LGBTQ advocate who once suggested during the 2024 campaign that Trump only spoke in Howell, Michigan because it has ties to the KKK. Did she hit President Trump in the face on purpose? RECEIPTS 👇🏻

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Michigan, Trump will address crime in Howell, a town of approximately 10,000 people. His campaign stated that, in contrast to VP Harris, Trump aims to "overfund the police." The campaign has not explained why Howell was chosen as the location. Howell has historical ties to the Ku Klux Klan and was the site of a white supremacist demonstration last month.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Michigan, Trump will speak about crime in Howell. It's a town of about 10,000. Ahead of that, his campaign emphasized in contrast to what VP Harris has said in the past, Trump wants to, quote, overfund the police. Trump's campaign has not yet responded to NPR's questions about why they chose Howell. Howell has historic links to the Ku Klux Klan and was the site of a white supremacist demonstration last month. Danielle Kurtzleben, NPR News, Detroit, Michigan. Secretary of state Anthony Blinken.
VivekGRamaswamy
Posted - December 30, 2023 at 5:08 PM
Saved - December 30, 2023 at 6:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CNN allegedly issued a cease & desist to the author's campaign shortly after their town hall received significant views on YouTube. The author contrasts this with a CNN town hall featuring Nikki Haley, which has been up for 6 months with fewer views. The author believes CNN is favoring their preferred candidate.

@VivekGRamaswamy - Vivek Ramaswamy

This game is RIGGED. CNN threatened my campaign with a cease & desist within 12 hours of posting my town hall after it got 200k+ views on YouTube in a matter of hours. Yet Nikki Haley’s CNN town hall is still up after 6 months (68k total views, sad). They’re trying their best to prop up their puppet. Don’t let them.

View Full Interactive Feed