reSee.it - Related Post Feed

heyitsmeCarolyn
Posted - April 20, 2023 at 11:49 AM
Saved - April 20, 2023 at 12:06 PM

@heyitsmeCarolyn - ꧁♛𝕮𝖆𝖗𝖔𝖑𝖞𝖓♛꧂

This right here👇

MikeBenzCyber
Posted - June 9, 2023 at 5:23 PM
Saved - June 9, 2023 at 5:54 PM

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

Oh my god. And remember, Eastern District of New York (EDNY) is the central locus of lawfare against Trump allies. The prosecution factory against Trump is run by all the people whose economic interests are threatened by Trump’s foreign policy.

@TruthNinja316 - Truth Ninja

Kyiv Post asked the attorney for Burisma, (Former EDNY/DOJ AG) John Buretta, was the UAH 180 Million they paid in back-taxes a bribe? *Coincidentally, UAH 180 Million is exactly...5 Million Dollars. Where have we heard that amount recently? https://bidenlaptopemails.com/biden-emails/email.php?id=20170201-212457_114797

John Buretta: For us it was important to close all cases against Burisma and Nikolay Zlochevskyi in a legally sound manner | KyivPost John Buretta: For us it was important to close all cases against Burisma and Nikolay Zlochevskyi in a legally sound manner | KyivPost bidenlaptopemails.com
julie_kelly2
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 6:54 PM
Saved - August 9, 2023 at 9:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jack Smith falsely claimed that Trump was a flight risk to convince Judge Beryl Howell to seal the case. Howell agreed, preventing Trump from knowing about the Twitter search warrant. House GOP should impeach Howell, who has been unrestrained in her evil actions. Elon Musk's excessive fine is likely retaliation for exposing Democrat-government-Big Tech collusion and his support for conservatives.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

OMFG - Jack Smith "errantly" claimed Trump was a flight risk to convince Judge Beryl Howell to prevent Trump from knowing about the Twitter search warrant. BERYL HOWELL AGREED THAT TRUMP WOULD "FLEE FROM PROSECTION" so she ordered the case sealed. https://t.co/P3CxqSKkl8

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

It is LONG overdue for House GOP to impeach DC Judge Beryl Howell. Evil unrestrained. https://t.co/dbyZH91Rtd

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

I am sure this excessive and unusual fine has NOTHING to do with Elon Musk's free speech approach, expose of the Twitter files to show Democrats/government/Big Tech collusion, and his general embrace of conservatives once purged from the site. https://t.co/U7OuQBKGLO

MarioNawfal
Posted - August 11, 2023 at 7:39 PM
Saved - August 12, 2023 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried has been jailed as his bail was revoked due to tampering with witnesses. Facing fraud and conspiracy charges, he may have access to a laptop in jail. Judge Kaplan found probable cause for witness tampering and expressed concern about detention conditions. SBF's lawyer requested an appeal, while the possible prisons are Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) and Putnam County Correctional Facility (PCCF). MDC has poor conditions, while PCCF is known for its quality facilities. SBF's lawyers have already filed an appeal against the remand decision.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨BREAKING: FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried TO BE JAILED | Bail Revoked SBF is being incarcerated for tampering with at least 2 witnesses. He will be in jail prior to his October trial, facing a range of fraud and conspiracy charges. He may have access to a laptop with an internet connection. Judge Kaplan determined that "there is probable cause to believe that the defendant has attempted to tamper with witnesses at least twice under Section 1512(b)." Judge Kaplan also mentioned, "I'm primarily concerned about the possibility of his detention at the MDC, which isn't considered a five-star facility. However, I recognize that he may have a dedicated laptop there." THE SAGA IS COMING TO AN END, SBF IS NO LONGER A FREE MAN But why have access to a Laptop??? Thoughts? Hearing Ongoing. Stay tuned for further updates.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨SBF IN HANDCUFFS: SBF lawyer asked for a written order so that he can appeal the decision. Judge Kaplan said it would be provided overnight. Then Kaplan ordered him to be remanded. SBF was handcuffed and taken into custody. More updates below LIVE.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨POSSIBLE PRISONS FOR SBF: Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) v Putnam County Correctional Facility (PCCF) SBF is not going to any 5-star jail as Judge Kaplan said “I am focused on the possibility that he will be detained at the MDC, not on anyone's list of five star facilities” MDC has been criticized for its poor conditions, including overcrowding, violence, and lack of access to medical care. In 2019, the Department of Justice Inspector General released a report that found that MDC-Brooklyn was "one of the worst" federal detention facilities in the country. PCCF is known for its clean and safe facilities, its well-trained staff, and it has won an award for prisons. AUSA Sassoon said that she communicated with MDC, and that they have desktops and some situations with laptops. This was in relation to SBF having the opportunity to prepare for his trial. SBF will most probably be kept in MDC as this is what Judge Kaplan believed would be the best place to give him access to a computer for several hours.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨BREAKING: SBF LAWYERS FILED AN APPEAL An appeal against the remand to jail has been filed less than an hour after SBF was handcuffed and led away by US Marshals. https://t.co/vAlwtf64J0

WayneTechSPFX
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 3:50 PM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 8:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended the ongoing civil fraud trial against Donald Trump in New York, where he faces serious allegations from Attorney General Letitia James regarding financial misrepresentation. The trial has seen various developments, including a limited gag order against Trump for disparaging remarks about court staff. Meanwhile, Trump is also appealing rulings that could affect his eligibility for the 2024 ballot in multiple states. As the legal battles intensify, I remain focused on the implications of these cases for Trump's political future and the broader electoral landscape.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Election interference. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump arrives at New York court for $250 million fraud trial KEY POINTS: The $250 million civil fraud trial that could see Donald Trump permanently banned from doing business in New York has begun. Trump is present in the courtroom in the Manhattan Supreme Court. New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Trump, two of his adult children, the Trump Organization and its top officials of engaging in a yearslong pattern of financial fraud. James alleges the defendants misstated the values of real estate properties by billions of dollars in business records to obtain better loan and insurance terms and tax benefits. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16962612835975&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F10%2F02%2Ftrump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html…

Trump New York fraud trial ends first day with tax accountant testimony New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Donald Trump, the Trump Organization and others of engaging in business fraud for years. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Election interference. Trump. Fraud trial. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump makes a powerful statement upon leaving the courtroom today. Goes in on corrupt deepstate operative Letitia James

Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge's recent comments indicate that about 80% of the case is likely resolved due to the statute of limitations, particularly regarding transactions before 2014. While it's unusual not to have a jury, the judge's acknowledgment of the statute is appreciated. There are no victims in this case; banks profited and were satisfied with their dealings. This situation is seen as political interference in the 2024 presidential election, taking time away from campaigning. The speaker emphasizes the success of their business, which has grown significantly since 2011, and criticizes the New York Attorney General for focusing on this case instead of addressing violent crime in the state.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think that was very good. That last 5 minutes was outstanding because the judge essentially conceded that the statute of intentions that, we wanted the Court of Appeals is in effect. Therefore, about 80% of the case is over. I was going to come out and say that, as you know, we're not entitled to a jury, which is pretty unusual in the United States of America. So I think it's very unfair that I don't have a jury, but the judge's last statement was very fair. And if I read it right, I'll let perhaps one of the lawyers speak to it. But, good night, you'll speak to it if you would. But, the way I interpret that and the way everyone else in the room seems to interpret that is that the statute of limitations is a very real thing in this country. And that would be about 80% that this case would be over. Could somebody speak to that, please? What what we're talking about? Sure. So based on the judge's comments based on the judge's comments at the end of the year, at end of the trial today, it would appear that he is agreeing that all of the transactions that closed prior to 2014 are now out of the case, which is about 80% of the case. And it's also, something that we want on appeal, but was not accepted by this court but now seems to be accepted by this court. As far as the jury is concerned, it's much different now, I must tell you, than it was 20 minutes ago. We're gonna come out and complain that, you know, in this country, you're entitled to a jury. But we very much appreciate the judge's decision today or his statement today on the statute of limitations, which is a very big thing. It's a limited time period, and we did nothing wrong. And if you look at the statements, they show that even in 2011, I I guess the number was 258,000,000 in cash, very strong company. I don't believe we really I wouldn't do a couple of deals or something, but I wouldn't have even needed to go to banks. Banks loved our business. They loved our deals. They weren't defrauded. They lost no money. They made money. They had the finest attorneys that there are. Frankly, their attorneys were better than my attorneys. And, they made a lot of money, and they considered to be a very good client. I paid them back on time, on schedule. There was no default. It never even sent me a default letter. Not once, for years. Never got a default letter. And there's no case here. There's no victim. The banks aren't a victim. The insurance companies are a victim. Everybody gets paid. It's a terrible, terrible thing. This was for politics. Now it has been very successful for them because they took me off the campaign trail. Because I've been sitting in a courthouse all day long instead of being in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, or a lot of other places I could be at. This is a horrible situation for our country. It's never happened before. It's election interference. They're interfering with the presidential election of 2024, and the people of our country see it. But this was a big, big, I I say surprise, but it was a great credit to the court that the judge was willing to do this. Sort of overruled himself, and I greatly respect that. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. Are you back to us? We may. I mean, I'd love that one. I'd love to be campaigning instead of doing this. Because we built I built a great company. That's one thing people are seeing all the way back to 2011. And today, it's much bigger and much better and even much more liquid. That was $258,000,000 for a real estate development. That's a lot of money. It was in 2011. Today, it's much more than that. Much much more. I built a great company and did great things for New York, and they should respect that. I've employed thousands and thousands of people in New York, and they should respect that. The attorney general of this state is a disgrace. Leticia James is a disgrace. She's a disgrace to our country and to the state of New York. She should focus on all of the violent crime and the murders going on in New York, not on somebody that paid back the banks in full without a default, and in many cases, paid it back early. Thank you very much, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Gag. Judge. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump judge issues limited gag order after former president makes disparaging post about court clerk A New York judge placed a limited gag order on Donald J. Trump on Tuesday after the former president posted a message to social media targeting the judge’s law clerk. Mr. Trump attacked the clerk, Allison Greenfield, shortly before noon on his Truth Social site. His post was a picture of Ms. Greenfield with Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic majority leader. Mr. Trump mocked Ms. Greenfield as “Schumer’s girlfriend” and said that the case against him should be dismissed. The post was taken down during a lunch break, shortly after a closed-door meeting in the room where Mr. Trump is being tried. Justice Arthur F. Engoron explained what had happened after the break, though he did not name Ms. Greenfield or Mr. Trump, referring to him only as a defendant. “Personal attacks on my members of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I will not tolerate them under any circumstances,” he said. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/nyregion/trump-gag-order-fraud-trial.html

Trump Ordered Not to Comment on Judge’s Staff in Fraud Case The former president attacked Justice Arthur F. Engoron’s clerk in a social media post that soon disappeared. He was called to account behind closed doors, then chastised in court as the judge issued a limited “gag order.” nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump returns to New York courtroom as civil fraud trial continues Former President Donald Trump is attending his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday, returning to a Manhattan courtroom for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. Trump, two of his sons, and their company were already found liable for fraud in September in the civil suit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The trial is proceeding on several other charges, including falsification of business records and conspiracy. Corrupt NY AG Letiticia James made a video yesterday of new developments in the case Trial Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-trial-new-york-court-civil-fraud-charges/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today marked the start of the third week in the trial against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization. Testimony came from two current employees: an assistant vice president and a hotel division executive. The assistant vice president, responsible for Trump's financial statements, confirmed that Allen Weisselberg indicated Trump wanted his net worth inflated. The hotel executive, a certified public accountant, used these financial statements for reporting to Scottish authorities. He stated that Trump had over $290 million in cash equivalents, but later admitted this figure was likely overstated and he wouldn't have reported it had he known it was inaccurate. The defendants have built their business on falsehoods, and as the judge noted, false statements cannot be used in business.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we started the 3rd week of our trial against Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, and other defendants. We mainly heard testimony from 2 current employees at the Trump Organization, an assistant vice president and an executive in the hotels division. The assistant vice president was responsible for preparing Donald Trump's statements of financial condition. These are the fraudulent documents that at the very center of our case. On the stand today, the assistant vice president was asked if defendant Allen Weisselberg ever told him that mister Trump wanted his net worth to go up on his statements. His answer, yes. Our second witness is an executive in the Trump's Hotels division who has a graduate degree in accounting. He's a certified public accountant. And while he did not work on the statements of financial condition, he relied on them to demonstrate Trump's financials to authorities in Scotland for Trump's properties there. One of the main questions was how much liquidity did Trump have. Based on the statements, this witness told authorities that Trump had cash equivalents in excess of $290,000,000. Asked on the stand about it today, the witness admitted that the number he presented to Scottish tax authorities appears to have been overstated and that he probably would not have presented that number to authorities had he known that it wasn't accurate. For years, the defendants built a business on lies and misrepresentations. To quote the judge and the law, you cannot make false statements and use them in business.
Instead of coming face-to-face with Michael Cohen, Trump confronts emails and spreadsheets at New York trial Former President Donald Trump attended his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Testify. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump to take the stand momentarily I don't watch the fake news media. So this channel I've been subscribed to since day 1 is streaming the event live. He's a patriot. https://www.youtube.com/live/Yv-x1Y6rphU?si=Pz2aWm9ZwqoqGQ5C

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump co-defendant in GA election case Harrison Floyd refusing plea deal. He wants to focus his case on proving Trump won the 2020 election in Georgia.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. TrIal. Alina. Fraud. NYC. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump attorney and spokesperson Alina Habba officially declares plan to file for MISTRIAL in the corrupt AG Octogon member Letitia James' SHAM trial against President Trump

Video Transcript AI Summary
Former President Trump spoke at a rally, expressing that his indictments are a badge of honor and a tactic to discourage voters. He is currently involved in a civil trial in New York, facing a $250 million lawsuit from Attorney General Leticia James for allegedly misleading banks about asset values. Trump's attorney, Alina Haba, discussed a gag order limiting their ability to speak publicly about the case and mentioned plans to file for a mistrial soon. She asserted that Trump's children, who have testified, were not involved in any wrongdoing. Haba criticized James for pursuing the case, suggesting it was politically motivated and detracting from more pressing issues in the city.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Indictment. Even that stupid trial going on in New York, which has been totally discredited. Everybody's been discredited. That's all comes out of the White House. That's to discourage people from voting. That's to hurt us. The only difference is we have a big voice. But every time I'm indicted, I consider it a great badge of honor because I'm being indicted for youth. Speaker 1: And that is former president Trump speaking at a rally in South Florida on Wednesday night on his ongoing legal issues with president Biden's Department of Justice and Democrat prosecutors. The 45th president currently in the middle of a civil trial in New York in which he and his children and the Trump Organization are being sued by the state's attorney general, Leticia James, for $250,000,000 over accusations that they misled banks and others about the value of their assets. James has been front and center at the trial, appearing in the courtroom and holding news conferences at the end of the day, even as violent crime continues to plague everyday New Yorkers. During James' tenure as AG, crime is up 29% in the Big Apple over a 2 year period. While the city saw a 214% spike in anti Semitic crimes last month amid Israel's war against the Hamas terrorists. Joining me right now in this Sunday morning futures exclusive is president Trump's attorney, Alina Haba. Alina, thanks so much for being here today. Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. Speaker 1: So we just heard from, the AG, Leticia James, talking about this trial. Mhmm. She comes out and talks a lot, but president Trump is not allowed to say anything. Speaker 2: Yeah. We have a gag order currently, against certain issues that we can't speak to, and we've seen this on many cases of his. You know, Jack Smith has moved for the same thing. And it's really, you know, it's a first amendment right. He's also a leading candidate. He has a right to speak. He should speak about anybody and anything that he sees that's corrupt. But we do even I have a limited gag order. Speaker 1: You have been complaining about the judge's clerk, and you say that the judge is is compromised, and the clerk appears compromised. Tell me why. Speaker 2: Well, I actually can't tell you why because I'm gagged. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 2: I can tell you that, you know, we'll be filing papers to address all of those issues. And, the fact that, frankly, Maria, I can't even discuss it with you, and I'm his spokeswoman, I'm his attorney, says a lot about what the judicial system the state of our judicial system right now. Speaker 1: I I think I I did see that there were donations that the clerk had given very supportive to the Democrats. That was one issue. Are you going to file to get a mistrial? Yes. When will you do that? Today? Speaker 2: Soon. Yeah. Very soon. Speaker 1: Okay. And and and how would that change things? Then you go from day 1, you start over again. Speaker 2: You know, the problem is with all of these things, such as filing a motion for recusal, which we've done twice, is that this judge has to be the one that decides, is he going to recuse himself? Does he feel that there was a mistrial? It's a bench trial. We have one judge, and it's the same judge that issued the gag order that has to make those determinations. So at this point, you know, I don't have, any reason to believe he shouldn't after what we've we've learned, if it's true. But I will tell you that it's concerning when he is the arbiter and the decision maker of of some of these issues. Speaker 1: These accusations that he overvalued his assets, what kind of third party people did you have or did Donald Trump have in terms of doing their own evaluation? Because, I mean, when you go to get deals, you have to get auditors to to to okay the valuations that you put in. Right? Right. Did he have auditors to Speaker 2: do that? He had an accounting firm put together what's a compilation. The compilation they were involved with, they were there all the time communicating with the Trump Organization. They put their stamp of approval on it. And then there was this disclaimer that everybody always puts on and says, hey. Do your own work. The disclaimer is very important. Remember, there was nobody harmed. These are sophisticated lenders. Deutsche Bank, you know, major major establishments with all kinds of regulations, KYC, FEC regulations. These people take somebody's numbers. They don't use them. They do their own due diligence, and they weren't harmed. They were paid on time. They were paid with interest. They made money. But Laticia James is putting her nose into private companies and private, individuals' work, which is not what's meant to happen. And the law that she's using is a consumer fraud law so that she can establish some way to have control, to not have a jury, to do certain things in this case that are nonsensical and shouldn't be happening. And we've been fighting it all along the way. The problem we have is the judge is the one that's gonna make those decisions, and he's proven himself to be quite motivated by the other side. Speaker 1: And you think he's compromised as well? Speaker 2: I'm not gonna speak to that, but we'll see. Speaker 1: Yeah. The president's children have testified. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: Ivanka, Don Junior, and Eric Trump as well. Don Junior speaking again tomorrow. Correct? What have they been asking the kids? And tell me how they fit into all of this. Speaker 2: They don't fit into all of this. What have they been asking the kids is very simple. They'll they'll ask the kids, did you give a value to somebody? Did you do something? And everybody said resoundingly, no. The kids were not involved. I believe that when they crafted this complaint, they looked at their titles and they looked at, frankly, PR. And if you patch in the kids, it's more days that Letitia James can go out there and speak. It's more more press for her, and it's more of an impact. Radical left liberals don't really care about facts. They don't care about law. They care about making statements, and these kids did nothing wrong. They should not be in this case. Ivanka's already out of the case. The boys should not be in the case. Their testimony was direct, and they just wanna make it as if there was some sort of corruption and some sort of conspiracy. There was none. There was an accounting firm. There were lawyers, and there were sophisticated lenders that all did their job, and nobody got harmed. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: But miss James wanted a headline. She campaigned on this, remember, before she was even the attorney general. That's how she got the attorney general role. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: She campaigned on Trump, so she had to follow through. And she should really dismiss this case. It's a little bad, frankly, and the city needs her attention elsewhere. Speaker 1: Alina, we're gonna be waiting and watching for your filings for a mistrial likely later today. Thank you for being here. Speaker 2: Thank you for having me.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Georgia. Election interference. Plea deals. Cabal intel: #BREAKING 4 days ago, Reverend Stephen Cliffgard Lee, one of 18 Trump's co-defendants, declared that he is not ACCEPTING a plea deal in the case initiated by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. "I am not going to plead out to a lie." "I'm not going to cooperate with evil. This is bigger than me." Now, this is how you stand up to cabal! Not like the other deepstate cabal traitors! He faces 5yrs in prison if convicted. I hope he has a legal donation fund setup! Instead of donating to these deepstate cabal Republicans who don't do a damn thing but talk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee from Orland Park, charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, announced he will not accept a plea deal. At a fundraiser for his legal fees, he stated he refuses to cooperate with what he calls "evil," unlike others who have taken plea deals for lighter sentences. If convicted, he faces a minimum of five years in a Georgia state prison.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And died along with former president Donald Trump in Georgia's election tampering case. He says he will not take a plea deal. Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee of Orland Park charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Chicago Tribune reports at a fundraiser for his legal fees last night, Lee says he'd not take a plea as others have done resulting in less severe penalties. He says, quote, I'm not going to cooperate with evil. He says if convicted, he faces a minimum of 5 years in a Georgia state prison.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election fraud. Ballots. Georgia. MI intel: #BREAKING 3600 duplicate Ballots of the 2020 election found in Fulton County #FultonCounty | #Georgia Trump delivered the news via Truth Social. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Law-fare. Octogon. Alina. MI intel: #VIDEO Alina Habba goes on a truth diatribe stating that Trump has already sued and won members of the cabal, including Hillary, members of the FBI, etc.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I won a court case against President Trump six months ago, which many may not know. The media, which I refer to as fake news, often misrepresents the truth. Trump has sued various parties, including Hillary Clinton and members of the FBI, over the Russia investigation. Despite being impeached twice, he remains resilient. Now, with multiple indictments, I’m focused on how to respond to the next one. The media aims to instill fear and distract supporters, but we are doing well. The current battle is not just political but legal, and it’s crucial to recognize that we are still in a strong position.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Who here knows that president Trump and I beat him in court 6 months ago when he sued him? You didn't know that either, did you? So I'm here to send you one very loud message. What the fake news covers and by the way, the fake news is everyone. Okay? Just because I go on Fox, just because I go on those stations, doesn't mean they're pro Trump. They're pro ratings. So let's be clear. Those are 2 big cases. You had no idea that President Trump sued Hillary Clinton. You had no idea that he sued members of the FBI. He sued everyone that came after him for Russia hoax. He was impeached once. They made it stronger. Impeached twice, he stayed. He was fine. And now we got how many indictments? I'm losing count. But you know what I care about more? What am I gonna say when we go to indictment number 4? It's fine. Bring it. Bring it. End of the day, here's the truth. The wins, they won't tell you because they want you to be scared. They want you to be worried that you're backing people that have no shot, and they wanna distract you. They give you clips. They give you sound bites, but I'm there. And unfortunately for president Trump, it's a sad day when he has to make his lawyer his spokesperson. But that is what the war is now. It's no longer warfare. It's lawfare. That's what we're dealing with. So let me just make sure you all understand something very clearly. We're doing well.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. J6. Fraud. Courts. Appeal. SC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid his appeal to dismiss Judge Chutkan put a pause on Trump's case until the Supreme Court decides whether to weigh in The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court, and put a pause on the case against the Republican 2024 frontrunner until the high court determines its involvement. Special Counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted on charges relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump said he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to reverse that outcome. Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court — the usual next step in the process — and have the Supreme Court take up the matter directly. Late Monday, the Supreme Court asked Trump’s lawyers to respond to the special counsel's motion by Wednesday, Dec. 20 — two days later than Smith had requested. Lawyers for Trump filed a motion Tuesday urging Judge Tanya Chutkan to pause proceedings against Trump in the Jan. 6 case while his appeal is pending. The trial was set to begin March 4, but now that start date could be delayed. Chutkan said that she would reconsider the trial date at the completion of the appeals process. Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-pauses-jan-6-case-against-trump-amid-former-presidents-appeal-dismiss

Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid former president's appeal to dismiss The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy Giuliani. Lawsuit. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani’s defamatory statements about them following the 2020 election. What to know about Rudy Giuliani’s defamation trial: •The jury delivered its verdict Friday afternoon in Rudy Giuliani's civil defamation trial related to false claims he made about two former election workers in Georgia. •Jurors awarded the plaintiffs Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss $148.17 million total in damages. •Freeman and Moss asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani's defamatory statements about them following the 2020 presidential contest when he baselessly accused them of election fraud. U.S. District Judge •Beryl Howell, who is overseeing the trial, ruled this year that Giuliani defamed the two women with his remarks. •Trial testimony this week lasted four days. Giuliani reversed course yesterday and said he would not take the stand in his defense, despite saying earlier that his testimony would make "definitively clear" that what he said about Freeman and Moss "was true." •The jury began deliberating yesterday afternoon following closing arguments in the case. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/live-blog/rcna129882?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17026806140030&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Flive-blog%2Frudy-giuliani-trial-verdict-defamation-live-updates-rcna129882

Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case: Recap Latest news and updates as a jury deliberates on the damages Giuliani will face for defaming two Georgia election workers following the 2020 election. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#AMERICAUNDERATTACK Trump. Election interference. Colorado. President. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former President Donald Trump can not appear on the state's ballots for the 2024 election due to his incitement of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, reversing a lower court ruling. But the state Supreme Court stayed its ruling from taking effect until Jan. 4, "subject to further appellate proceedings." The cabal is setting the stage for the steal. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/12/19/trump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17030279636160&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F12%2F19%2Ftrump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html

Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado court ruling barring Donald Trump from ballots in the state is the first time a court has rule he is disqualified for engaging in insurrection. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump team issued a statement on the Colorado decision

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy. Bankruptcy. Lawsuits. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million. Rudy files chapter 11 bankruptcy U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. Former Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss can immediately seek enforcement of their $146 million financial judgment against Rudy Giuliani because there is good reason to assume he will not comply, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. “Giuliani’s failure to ‘satisfy even more modest monetary awards entered earlier in this case,’ provides good cause to believe that he will seek to dissipate or conceal his assets during the 30-day period,” U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell wrote in her order. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna130719?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_ct=1703179669900&_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17031796416523&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fdonald-trump%2Fjudge-orders-rudy-giuliani-start-paying-georgia-election-workers-146-m-rcna130719

Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, lists $500M in debts after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. Giuliani, who was once hailed as “America’s Mayor,” listed debts of up to $500 million with assets of only $10 million in the filing, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday. I've repeatedly stated that they're setting up the steal again. Look around. The Dominion systems will still be in use. They've convicted a good portion of the J6ers. They've indicted Trump with election fraud. They've indicted those supposedly who were close to him, and many of those pled guilty and will testify against him. They've taken Trump off the ballot in Colorado pending appeal, with more states to follow. Do you get it yet? Source: https://nypost.com/2023/12/21/news/rudy-giuliani-files-for-bankruptcy-in-ny/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, owes up to $500M after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. nypost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Election interference. Michigan. SC. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The Michigan Supreme Court has declined to hear a case arguing that former President Donald Trump should be excluded from the state's primary ballot, meaning the frontrunner for the GOP nomination will remain a listed candidate. The order issued Wednesday is in line with lower court rulings in Michigan, though at odds with a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court. Source: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/12/27/michigan-supreme-court-trump-stays-primary-ballot/72037140007/

Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The argument over whether Trump is an eligible candidate center around whether his conduct around the 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol was insurrection. freep.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Escalation. Trump. Election interference. Ballots. Maine. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Resubscribe POLITICS Biden administration The Fix The 202s Polling Democracy in America Election 2024 DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state By Patrick Marley Updated December 29, 2023 at 1:29 a.m. EST|Published December 28, 2023 at 6:58 p.m. EST Maine on Dec. 28 became the second state to ban former president Donald Trump from its primary ballot due to his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state under a part of the U.S. Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. The Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case, which could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again. Both states have temporarily paused their decisions so Trump can pursue appeals. Developing... Keep a close eye on the Supreme Court. Hopefully, the global cabal blackmail group doesn't get to them. Based on their decision. We'll either know they're working with military intelligence[MI] or not. I was always taught. Hope for the best. Expect the worst. I don't trust anyone working in these cabal controlled institutions. There's a reason why the dems chose state Sen. Shenna Bellows as their new Secretary of State in Maine. She was the first-ever ranked-choice vote as the first woman to hold the position. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/28/maine-trump-primary-ballot/

Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine is the second state to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Republican. Deepstate. Trump. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Vivek Ramaswamy believes the Republican establishment is rooting for Trump to be forcibly removed from the ballot so they can prop up their chosen candidate. He stated that any state Trump is being removed from that the republican contenders for president should also remove their names from the ballot. If they don't, they are in on it, too. Lately, Vivek has been on a roll releasing comms. As I've been saying for this past year. The proof is in the pudding. Dominion, through actionable court proceedings, won their lawsuit against FOX, and many others stated that their voting machines were good. Courts agreed. Thus, they will continue to use the same systems. In the election fraud case in Georgia, many of the Trump team loyalists have pleaded guilty and decided to testify against Trump. That case and several others against Trump are coming up in a few short months. The precedent for those cases rests in the current Georgia case. I have a feeling that Trump will provide irrefutable evidence at these trials proving his innocence. Now, if the jury/judge decides to convict anyway, this will be another stolen election. I'm praying that it won't. But I am prepared if it does. So should you. Vivek is telling you right here:

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot, I will also withdraw my candidacy and challenge Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, and Ron DeSantis to do the same. If all Republicans in Maine step back, it will halt the interference in our GOP primary. Their refusal to act suggests a deeper issue, revealing a faction within the Republican establishment that supports this outcome as much as the Democrats do. We need to recognize this troubling game. I'm concerned that this is just the beginning of their plans for 2024. The system is determined to eliminate Trump from the election, as seen in recent events in Colorado and Maine. We should be worried about what lies ahead for our country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any state where Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot in this way, I'll also remove myself. And I challenge Chris Christie and Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis to do the same thing, or else they're also complicit. If every Republican removes themselves from the ballot in Maine, that automatically stops the selection interference in our GOP primary. Now the fact that they're not doing it reveals that there's something deeper going on. This isn't just the Democrats. There's a force within the Republican establishment that's propped up a chosen puppet, and they're actually rooting for this same outcome every bit as much as the Democrats are. And I think it's time we open our eyes to this insidious game that's being played. I'm deeply worried, but I'm worried that I'm right about this. That what we're seeing right now, this isn't the end of the road. This is just the beginning of what they're planning to pull in 2024. And you mark my words on that. This is the a system that has decided by hell or high water at one cost or another, they will eliminate this man from contention in this election. You see that happening Colorado 2 days ago, Maine today. You wait for what's happening in 2024, and I'm worried for this country found it on.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeal. J6. Maine. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. President Donald Trump on Tuesday filed an appeal of the decision by Maine’s top election official that he is ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot. “[T]he Secretary’s Ruling was the product of a process infected by bias and pervasive lack of due process; is arbitrary, capricious, and characterized by abuse of discretion,” Trump's attorneys wrote in the appeal. Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, ruled last week that the former president is constitutionally barred from appearing on the state’s primary ballot, citing his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. But Bellows’ office said her decision would not be enforced until the courts weigh in. Maine’s Republican primary is March 5. In her 34-page decision, Bellows wrote that Trump’s conduct around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol compelled her to rule him ineligible. “The weight of the evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump was aware of the tinder laid by his multi-month effort to delegitimize a democratic election, and then chose to light a match,” she wrote, adding that he “used a false narrative of election fraud to inflame his supporters and direct them to the Capitol to prevent certification of the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power.” In an interview with NBC News last month, Bellows said her preference would have been to wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the matter, which centers on the 14th Amendment, but she believed Maine law required her to act now. “The country would be well served if the United States Supreme Court issues clear guidance on this unprecedented constitutional question for all to follow,” Bellows said. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-challenge-maine-ruling-2024-primary-ballot-appeal-rcna131761

Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Fraud trial. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump makes closing arguments at the conclusion of the fraud case in New York City. No jury. Only a judge will render the verdict in the case. Hopefully, by the end of business day today, or tmr morning. 1 down. 3 cases to go. Video credit: wehaveitall

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've faced years of politically motivated attacks from the New York Attorney General, who campaigned on targeting me. Despite millions of pages of documents and extensive litigation, they lack evidence against us. The only witness they have is a convicted felon who has recanted his statements. We've already won in the Court of Appeals, but the judge has been slow to acknowledge that. This case is unprecedented, using a consumer fraud statute inappropriately, and feels like a witch hunt and election interference. Despite these challenges, our poll numbers are strong, and the American people understand the situation. Thank you for your support.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Yeah. We've gone through years with, this person. She's a political hack, the attorney general. The judge is obviously extremely friendly with the group, and we'll see, what happens. I think maybe, they surprise people on a positive side. We'll have to see what happens exactly. But, we've proven this case so conclusively. We've asked for directed verdict many times. They don't have any facts. They don't have any evidence against us. Millions and millions of pages, years of litigation, and all politically motivated. She campaigned on a I will get Trump. If you've ever seen any of the, seen any of her clips, they're horrible clips, actually, the anger. She's got serious drug derangement syndrome. There's no question about Leticia James, the corrupt attorney general of New York. So we've proven our case. Is not one witness against us other than one person who is a, deranged. He's got a lot of problems. He's a man who's been convicted of lying. He's a felon convicted felon and, not a good person, but that's their only witness, and he's now crashed and burned. They have no witnesses. And, by the way, that witness took back everything that he said. He took back everything he said in court. Took it all back. So they have no case. It's a shame that a thing like this is able to happen. Businesses leave New York. She went after Exxon, and they decided to move to Texas. And, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars they pay in taxes. I paid over $300,000,000 of taxes over the last number of years. 300,000,000 and, they don't recognize that. They don't recognize anything. So not think of it. Not one witness, millions of pages of document, years of this nonsense, and now it goes on. And one other factor, we won this case already in the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals voted in favor of us, but this judge has been very, very slow to accept that opinion because that's not the opinion that he wants. But we won in the Court of Appeals. That's the boss of this judge who has to know that. And there was a conclusive victory, statute of limitations and other things, and that case has already been won. So that's the story, and I thought we'd come down to 40 Wall Street, which is a great building, and you'd get a chance to see one of the nicest buildings in New York at a convenient place. And I don't have to pay any rent because we have it and it's been a very successful building. But it's a shame to have to have gone through this for years years years. And now we'll see if we're gonna get an honest verdict. We didn't have a jury. We had no rights to a jury. It's a statute that's never been used before for a purpose like this. I just watched a certain broadcast and they said, you know, they've been looking. Has it ever been used before? This is a statute that's a consumer fraud statute. Never been used for anything like this before, and it's a shame. It's, it's really a, it's a witch hunt in the truest sense of the word. It's election interference. And, it just came out. I just it was just right now, Leticia James visited Joe Biden in the White House numerous times during the Trump witch hunt, and this just came out about 10 minutes ago. I got it. And so it's all it's all a conspiracy to try and get Biden who can't put 2 sentences together trying to get him into office. So I just wanna let you know that, we have our best poll numbers. We have the best everything despite this, and maybe because of this. Because the people of the United States, all of those people back there, but the people of the United States really get it. They get it better than anybody else. Yeah. Please. Right. President Trump, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Charges. Ballots. Supreme Court. Election intel: #BREAKING TRUMP TO SC: "All presidents must have complete & total presidential immunity, or the authority & decisiveness of a President of the United States will be stripped & gone forever. Hopefully, this will be an easy decision. God bless the Supreme Court!"

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

RNC. Resolution. Haley. Trump. Election intel: #BREAKING RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. The Republican National Committee (RNC) is reviewing a draft resolution that, if approved, would declare Donald Trump the party’s presumptive 2024 presidential nominee even as Nikki Haley continues to wage a vigorous campaign against the former president and frontrunner. The draft resolution, obtained by The Dispatch Thursday morning, was proposed by David Bossie, an RNC committeeman from Maryland and close Trump ally. His effort to put the national party on a general election footing behind Trump follows RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel saying after the former president defeated Haley in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary that it was time for Republicans to unite behind the frontrunner and focus on defeating Joe Bidan. “RESOLVED that the Republican National Committee hereby declares President Trump as our presumptive 2024 nominee for the office of President of the United States and from this moment forward moves into full general election mode welcoming supporters of all candidates as valued members of Team Trump 2024,” reads a key portion of the draft resolution. Under current RNC rules, Trump still has to win the requisite number of nominating convention delegates—1,215—to become the party’s unchallenged presumptive nominee. After the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, Trump leads Haley in the race for delegates 32 to 17. But passage of this resolution, possibly next week at the RNC winter meeting in Las Vegas, could begin a preemptive process of the national party working with the former president as if he had already done so. And under RNC rules, that is permissible. This resolution, even in draft form, also functions as another sign that the GOP establishment is anxious to coalesce behind Trump and put an end to a presidential primary that, after his victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, the former president looks poised to win. Developing... Source: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-politics/rnc-moving-to-declare-trump-its-presumptive-nominee/

RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. - Start a free trial today for full access. thedispatch.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Lawsuit. Trials. Jury. COMMS. Defamation. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury just ruled that Donald Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages The nine-person jury began deliberations in federal court in New York at 1:40 p.m. ET and reached a verdict in just under three hours. The award included $11 million for damage to Carroll's reputation, $7.3 million for emotional harm and other damages, and $65 million in punitive damages. The decision came after contentious closing arguments that saw Trump storm out of the courtroom. He returned for his own attorney's closing arguments but left the courthouse at 4 p.m. before the jury returned its verdict. He posted about it on his social media platform on Truth Social a short time later. "Absolutely ridiculous!" he wrote, adding he would be appealing. "They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!" Carroll did not comment as she left the courthouse. The cabal has done this to use as Cannon fodder to try and use against him this election. They all need talking points, including Haley. This is also comms to let other juries know how to proceed in Trump’s other upcoming trials this year. As I've stated countless times concerning Trump’s trials. He's going to present all of the evidence in the world that can't be refuted. One of 2 things will happen. Out of all of the scenarios, the world will learn the truth about the election and J6, etc. First scenario. He'll get convicted anyway despite showing all of the evidence. That'll be the 1st marker for MI. Sparking what is to come. 2nd scenario, he's found innocent and vindicated of everything. Then Cabal goes into survival mode. All ops will get escalated globally, sparking the 2nd marker. Both scenarios will spark ops. Get ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/verdict-reached-e-jean-carrolls-defamation-damages-trial-trump-rcna135919

Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages, jury finds Former President Donald Trump must pay writer E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her, a jury found Friday. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. E. Jean Carroll. Epstein. Theater. Actors. COMMS. Cabal intel: #REPORT E. Jean Carroll named the mice that runs around her blue & white striped house that she named the 'Mouse House. She also has a dog named “Tits,” and paints rocks and trees blue in her backyard that runs by a river. What does her house remind you of? These are comms. These are criminals. They are cabal.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some distinguished mice live here. Kahneman is in the kitchen, and Taborski is in the bedroom. This is my shed, and on the door is a list of my dogs: Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. I was horrified to see the dry streams and rivers, which inspired me to paint the rocks blue to show where the water once flowed. After painting the rocks, I moved on to paint the trees, and soon I had painted the entire forest.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taborski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door of the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest. That's because some very distinguished, mice live here.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. IRS. Taxes. Elon. Leaks. MI intel: #BREAKING Ex-IRS Contractor Who Leaked Trump, Griffin Tax Data Gets Five Years in Prison A former Internal Revenue Service contractor who stole and leaked the tax returns of former President Donald Trump, Ken Griffin, Elon Musk, and other billionaires was sentenced to five years in prison. Charles Littlejohn, 38, had pleaded guilty Oct. 12 to stealing Trump’s tax data from the IRS and leaking it to the New York Times. He also admitted taking tax information about thousands of other wealthy Americans, including Jeff Bezos, that he passed to ProPublica. The judge called it the biggest heist in IRS history and “an intolerable attack on our democracy. Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-29/irs-leaker-of-trump-griffin-tax-data-gets-five-years-in-prison?embedded-checkout=true

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Bidan. Carroll. Election intel: #REPORT Carroll: "I'll do everything I can" to help Bidan beat Trump in 2024.” This means she'll lie, cheat, and steal.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The idea is that when you confront Donald Trump, he appears as just a man without power. His influence comes from the people around him who support him. This concept is similar to Hans Christian Andersen's tale, "The Emperor's New Clothes," where the emperor's power is an illusion created by his followers. Currently, Trump is campaigning for president again and polling suggests a tight race. There hasn't been communication from Joe Biden's campaign about facing Trump, but there is a willingness to engage if necessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That when you've actually faced the man, he's just a man with no clothes on. Yeah. It's the people around him that are giving him the power. What do you mean by that? Speaker 1: Well, Hans Christian Andersen's great fairy tale, the emperor has no clothes, that is written about Donald Trump. It's just we're the ones who clothe him in all this power. He has none himself. It's his followers. It's his hangers on. In the court, they were strutting back and forth and handing him messages. It was right, Robbie? Miss Scott, Speaker 2: you say it's nothing. You say the emperor has no clothes. The emperor is trying to run for president Yeah. Again. Speaker 1: And And right now is leading. Speaker 2: And right now, the polls suggest it's a coin flip. It's very close. Have you heard from Joe Biden's campaign arm about potentially campaigning against the former president Donald Trump? No. Are you interested in doing so? Speaker 1: Do anything I can. Speaker 2: That's a yes. Speaker 0: What was it? Said that

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Appeals. Judges. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump D.C. trial drops off court’s March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case Administrative move comes as anticipation mounts over how — and when — an appeals court will decide former president’s claim of immunity from criminal prosecution. President Donald Trump’s March 4 trial date on charges of plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election has been dropped from the public calendar of the federal court in Washington, a sign of what has long been anticipated — that his claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution would delay his trial while it remains on appeal. The change did not appear on the official criminal case docket before the U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who has made clear since Trump filed his appeal on Dec. 7 that all trial deadlines would be suspended while he challenges the case. On appeal, Trump is arguing that the government does not have authority under the Constitution to bring charges against him for actions he took while president after the 2020 election through the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, when he attempted to prevent Congress from confirming Joe Biden’s election victory. A delay in the D.C. case makes it increasingly likely that the first of Trump’s four criminal trials could be held this spring in Manhattan on New York state charges of business fraud in connection with hush money payments during the 2016 election. That trial has nominally been set for March 25, but the court, in that case, has signaled deference to Trump’s federal election subversion case. New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has scheduled a pretrial hearing in two weeks — Feb. 15 — and is expected to decide after that if the trial will go forward as planned. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/

Trump’s D.C. trial removed from March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case A delay in Trump’s case in D.C. makes it likely that the first of his four criminal trials could be his New York state prosecution accusing him of business fraud. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. FOIA. DOJ. FBI. Fraud. Ballots. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Brand new FOIA documents just uncovered reveals that the DOJ and FBI uncovered alarming 2020 election ballot fraud in Detroit, Michigan, and covered it up In the emails, a DOJ official says, "This allegation, and accompanying photos, is alarming. I would like FBI to look into this, please." Someone at the Michigan Attorney General's office also responded to the complaint, "Talked to the FBI on this and it's not going to be in their lane or ours in terms of apparent criminal actions, but MDOS[Michigan Department of State] may want to call and try and head this off." Source: yehuda_miller

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Federal. Appeals. Courts. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claim that he was immune to charges of plotting to subvert the results of the 2020 election, ruling that he must go to trial on a criminal indictment accusing him of seeking to overturn his loss to President Biden. The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed Mr. Trump was a significant defeat, but it was unlikely to be the final word on his claims of executive immunity. Mr. Trump, who is on a path to locking up the Republican presidential nomination, is expected to continue his appeal to the Supreme Court. Still, the panel’s 57-page ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? Trump will file an appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump is now in the cabal playing field. Brace yourselves this year, guys. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/trump-immunity-appeals-court.html

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Judge. Rulings. Octigon intel: #BREAKING Judge set to rule in Trump's $370 million civil fraud case A New York state judge is expected to rule on Friday in a $370 million civil fraud case against former U.S. President Donald Trump, who is accused of inflating his net worth to dupe bankers into giving him better loan terms. Justice Arthur Engoron's ruling could deal a major blow to Trump's real estate empire as the businessman turned politician seeks the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election. The lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accused Trump and his family businesses of overstating his net worth by as much $3.6 billion a year over a decade. Trump has denied wrongdoing and called the case a political vendetta by James, an elected Democrat. In addition to monetary penalties, James is seeking to permanently ban Trump from New York's real estate industry and sharply limit his ability to do business in the state. She is also seeking five-year industry bans for Trump's two adult sons, Don Jr. And Eric, who are also defendants in the case. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-set-rule-trumps-370-million-civil-fraud-case-2024-02-16/#:~:text=Justice%20Arthur%20Engoron's%20ruling%20could,the%20Nov.%205%20U.S.%20election.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Judge orders Trump and his companies to pay more than $350 million in the New York civil case. Bars Trump from running businesses in the city for three years.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Motion. Judge. Carroll. COMMS. Octogon intel: #UPDATE Judge Denies Trump’s Delayed Payment Request In E. Jean Carroll Case The New York judge who oversaw E. Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump rejected the former president’s request to delay paying Carroll more than $80 million in damages, according to a Sunday court filing. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, requested an “administrative stay” on Friday to pause Trump’s required payments to Carroll after he made defaming statements against the former writer in 2019. Kaplan said Sunday he would not grant a pause without allowing Carroll and her team to respond and gave them until Thursday at 5 p.m. to respond to Trump’s motion. In Habba’s Friday motion, she asked Kaplan to stay the motion for at least 30 days until Trump’s post-trial motions were resolved, claiming there was a “strong probability” the verdict could be reduced or eliminated on appeal. If they're giving Trump and attorneys a hard time now in just civil suits. Just imagine what they're going to do in the criminal trials. This corrupt 2-tiered justice system is designed to railroad those the cabal wants locked up. It doesn't make a difference how much money a person may have. Sometimes, it does in rare cases. Be prepared for what is to come. https://www.msn.com/en-US/finance/-companies/judge-denies-trumps-delayed-payment-request-in-e-jean-carroll-case/ar-BB1iRzRB?ocid=sapphireappshare

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Interest. Bankrupt. Orders. Civil. COMMS. Octogon intel: #BREAKING $100 MILLION in interest added to Trump's judgment accruing interest at $100k daily In New York, former President Donald Trump's bills are racking up. The judgment in his civil fraud trial was officially entered with the court today — $454,156,783.05 for him alone, plus Trump is now accruing over $100,000 of post-judgment interest each day. This is on top of the recent $83.3 million verdict against him in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial. Trump and the other defendants in the civil fraud case — his sons Donald Jr. and Eric Trump and two other Trump Organization executives — have 30 days to appeal the decision by Judge Arthur Engoron, which found them liable for fraud for misrepresenting the value of Trump properties. The message is loud and clear. The Octogon intends to bankrupt Trump. Usually, in civil cases. The lawyers tie up litigation on appeals for years. Not in Trump's cases. They want the full amount in 30 days or face hefty interest, fines, penalties, and possible jail time. Next up is Trump's criminal cases. Where he faces decades in prison. Be prepared for what is to come. Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-civil-fraud-judgment-over-450-million-100000-interest-per-day/

Trump's civil fraud judgment is officially over $450 million, and climbing over $100,000 per day The amount former President Donald Trump owes in his New York civil fraud case is $454,156,783 — plus $111,983 of post-judgment interest accruing each day. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Properties. Assets. Seizure. COMMS. Financial. NY. Octogon intel: #REPORT Attorney General Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trump's assets if he can't pay his $354 million civil fraud fine.

Video Transcript AI Summary
New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that if Trump cannot pay the over $300 million in penalties from his civil fraud trial, they will seek court enforcement to seize his assets. This includes significant properties like 40 Wall Street. Trump will need to post a bond within the next 25 days, which involves cash and rights to some properties. He has the option to appeal the verdict, but ultimately, he must pay whatever amount is determined. If he cannot provide the cash, prosecutors will proceed to seize and liquidate his assets to satisfy the judgment owed to the state of New York.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the New York attorney general Letitia James told ABC News she is going to do if Trump cannot afford to pay the 300,000,000 plus in penalties from his civil fraud trial? Here's what she said. Speaker 1: If he does not have funds, to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment enforcement mechanisms in court. And we will ask the judge to seize his assets. Speaker 0: Those assets include big buildings here in New York City, including, she talked a bit about, 40 Wall Street. Is that what would play out here normally for someone, and do you see this happening? Speaker 2: Yeah. So this is the way it will go, Poppy. First of all, Donald Trump, within the next 25 days or so, is gonna post a bond, meaning some cash element plus the deeds, the rights to some of his properties, including potentially some of those buildings. Then Donald Trump will have the right to appeal, of course. And whatever comes out of that appeal, whatever's left of this verdict, maybe all $350 +1000000, maybe some smaller number, maybe none of it. But whatever comes out of it, Donald Trump then has to pay. This is not negotiable. This will be a judgment owed not to individuals but to the state of New York. And Right. If he cannot put up cash to satisfy that judgment, then the next move that a prosecutor makes is you seize and liquidate assets until you get up to that number.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeals. NY. Courts. Patriot intel: #UPDATE Donald Trump appeals $454 million loss in New York real estate fraud case President Donald Trump filed an appeal Monday against the dramatic $454 million court loss he suffered in a New York real estate fraud case. Trump's liability includes penalties of about $355 million plus interest that started running at different times for different Trump properties. Interest will continue accumulating at 9% a year until the judgment is paid under state law. Trump filed the appeal document Monday along with his two oldest sons, former Trump Organization executives, and several business entities. Although Trump didn't lay out his appellate arguments on Monday, legal experts expect he will argue that the fraud he was found liable for didn't involve traditional victims. James made the case that Trump inflated his net worth to get better loan terms, but the lenders themselves haven't sued Trump alleging they were harmed by the inflation. "We trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious fine and take the necessary steps to restore the public faith in New York’s legal system," Trump lawyer Alina Habba said in a statement Monday. I have his appeal pdf file. it's 102pgs long. If his appeal is accepted or rejected. Will set a precedent on how Trump’s other cases play out this year. Source: usatoday

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Pause. Judgment. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump cannot line up full bond in New York fraud case, offers to post $100 million Donald Trump on Wednesday lost a bid to pause a $454.2 million civil fraud judgment against him for overstating his net worth and real estate values to dupe lenders, meaning he must soon find the cash or post a bond to prevent New York authorities from seizing his property while he appeals. The decision by Associate Justice Anil Singh of the New York Appellate Division must be affirmed by a full panel of the mid-level state appeals court. Singh granted Trump's request for a stay of a portion of Justice Arthur Engoron's Feb. 16 decision barring the former president from running any New York corporation or seeking loans from the state's banks for three years. In asking for the stay earlier on Wednesday, Trump's lawyers said he is unable to post a bond for the full amount of the judgment while he appeals and wants instead to secure a $100 million bond. A bonding company would be on the hook for any payout if Trump loses his appeal and proves unable to pay. In their filing with the Appellate Division, Trump's lawyers said a stay of Engoron's decision was needed because Trump would suffer "irreparable harm" if James were free to sell his real estate assets to raise capital to pay the judgment. The lawyers also said the "exorbitant and punitive amount of the judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure and post a complete bond." They said a $100 million bond, together with Trump's "vast" real estate holdings and ongoing oversight by a court-designated monitor for the Trump Organization, would be more than sufficient to secure the judgment. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cannot-line-up-full-bond-new-york-fraud-case-offers-post-100-mln-2024-02-28/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Illinois. Eligibility. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Illinois judge says 14th Amendment bars Trump from 2024 primary ballot A judge in Cook County, Illinois, on Wednesday ruled that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the "insurrection clause," bars former President Donald Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot. The order overrules a January determination from the Illinois State Board of Elections that Trump could remain eligible. Cook County Circuit Judge Tracie Porter placed an immediate stay on her decision until March 1 "in anticipation of an appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, or the Illinois Supreme Court." Trump plans to appeal the ruling, a source familiar confirms. The Supreme Court is currently debating Trumps appeal. The ultimate ruling from the SC will also set the precedent on how things will play out for the rest of this year. I personally don't think it'll be great news. I really hope I'm wrong. The precedent will be set either way. Developing...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on whether former President Trump can be barred from reelection under the 14th Amendment. Trump's attorney contends that he is not an elected official or an officer of the United States, arguing that Section 3 applies only to those in office, not candidates. He warned that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the ballot could disenfranchise millions of voters. Conversely, the plaintiff's attorney claims Trump disqualified himself by attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power through insurrection. The court's decision will ultimately address Trump's eligibility in light of these allegations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To the US Supreme Court hearing arguments on whether former president Trump could be barred from reelection under the 14th amendment. Trump's attorney argued the former president is not covered under section 3 as an elected official, claiming also that he's not an officer of the United States. He also said that section 3 can't apply to a candidate only to those who hold office. He said that if the US Supreme Court affirms the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, which removed Trump from the ballot in that state, that it would, quote, take away votes of potentially tens of millions of Americans. The plaintiff's attorney argued that president Trump disqualified himself by trying to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power by engaging in insurrection against the constitution. He says that ultimately is this court's, is what this court is going to decide, and it's the question of whether Trump's eligibility holds amid that issue for the country. So let's bring in senior national correspondent Terry Moran outside the Supreme Court, ABC News Supreme Court contributor Kate Shaw, and ABC News executive editorial producer

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE This could be game over: Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case The justices agreed on Wednesday to decide whether Trump enjoys "total immunity" from prosecution. The timing of that decision likely means a trial over Trump's role in Jan. 6 won't begin — much less end — before the election. There's nothing Trump wants more in this case than a delay. If he wins in November and hasn't been tried before Inauguration Day, there's a good chance he never will be. "This could well be game over," election law expert Rick Hasen. Trump's first briefs are due to the high court in about three weeks. Oral arguments will be in late April. That sets the stage for a ruling in late June, at the end of the court's term. That's about as fast as the Supreme Court is capable of moving. The justices have kept the actual trial on ice in the meantime. The fundamental issue in this case — whether presidents are fully immune from prosecution over anything they did in office, even after they've left it — is one of the most profound questions of presidential power the court has ever had to answer. A lower court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's claims of immunity, ruling that he could be prosecuted for Jan. 6. Between the lines: The justices had options here. They could have declined to hear Trump's appeal. They wouldn't have had to tackle the question of presidential immunity, and Trump's trial would have proceeded before the election. That's what some legal experts were anticipating, based on how long it took the justices to announce whether they'd hear the case. Once they agreed to hear the appeal and decide whether presidents are beyond the reach of the criminal-justice system, keeping the trial paused makes sense. If you're not sure whether someone can be prosecuted, it's logical not to prosecute them until you've figured that out. Source: https://www.axios.com/2024/02/29/trump-wins-delay-immunity-case-supreme-court

"This could be game over:" Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case A delay is what Trump wanted most — even if he loses at the end of it. axios.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Ballots. Rulings. Election intel: #BREAKING Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Donald Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado’s primary ballot last year, the US supreme court has ruled, clearing the way for Trump to appear on the ballot in all 50 states. The court’s unanimous decision overturns a 4-3 ruling from the Colorado supreme court that said the former president could not run because he had engaged in insurrection during the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. The Colorado decision was a novel interpretation of section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars insurrectionists from holding office. “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the court wrote in an unsigned opinion. Congress, the court said, had to enact the procedures for disqualification under Section 3. “State-by-state resolution of the question whether Section 3 bars a particular candidate for President from serving would be quite unlikely to yield a uniform answer consistent with the basic principle that the President … represent[s] all the voters in the Nation,” the court added. Maine and a judge in Illinois had also excluded Trump from the ballot – decisions that are now likely to be quickly reversed. All nine justices agreed with the central holding in the case: that the Colorado supreme court had wrongly barred Trump from appearing on the ballot. But agreement did not extend beyond that. "For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case," Justice Barrett wrote in her concurring opinion. "That is the message Americans should take home." Trump, praised Monday's ruling. "It was a very important decision," he said in Mar-a-Lago hours after it was announced, calling it "very well-crafted. And I think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together." He added, "I have great respect for the Supreme Court, and I want to just thank them for working so quickly and so diligently and so brilliantly." Moves and countermoves. The cabal thought it would be easier to simply just remove Trump from the ballot as a contingency if Trump so happens to win his court cases. The states that elected to remove Trump from the ballot are compromised. The patriots there need to expose all corruption from the local governments there. Colorado. Illinois. Maine. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/04/trump-scotus-colorado-ruling

Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Court’s decision clears way for ex-president to appear on primary ballot in all states theguardian.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Dossier. Judgements. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over the Steele dossier President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a six-figure legal bill to a company founded by a former British spy that he unsuccessfully sued for making what his lawyer called “shocking and scandalous" false claims that harmed his reputation. A London judge, who threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence last month saying it was “bound to fail," ordered Trump to pay legal fees of 300,000 pounds[$382,000], according to court documents released Thursday. The Octogon has the judges. They are sleepers. This is just setting the stage for Trump’s upcoming criminal trials. Be prepared. Source: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/trump-ordered-pay-legal-fees-after-failed-lawsuit-107891658

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos Page Unavailable abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Judges. Charges. COMMS. Election interference intel: This is a win. But the battle is far from over. #BREAKING Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others in the case involving an alleged attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. The brief order from Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee states that six of the counts in the 41-count indictment returned by a Fulton County grand jury in August must be quashed. Of those six counts, Trump was charged with three of them. Joining Trump in the challenge to the six counts were former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and lawyers Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Ray Stallings Smith, and Robert Cheeley All had pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against them. Steve Sadow, Trump's lawyer, said the court's decision to quash the counts is the correct one. "The ruling is a correct application of the law, as the prosecution failed to make specific allegations of any alleged wrongdoing on those counts," he said in a statement. "The entire prosecution of President Trump is political, constitutes election interference, and should be dismissed." Eastman's attorney, Buddy Parker, said in a statement that "the court stated clearly the state failed to provide what exactly in the U.S. and Georgia constitutions the defendants solicited the public figures to violate, a clear error. We await the state's position on its intention in moving forward on the remaining charges." Allyn Stockton, Giuliani's local lawyer, said the quashing of the six counts was expected, as "there simply was not enough detail to put the defendants on notice of what to defend against." McAfee's ruling The six counts relate to various alleged attempts to solicit state officials to violate their oaths of office, both to the Georgia Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. The judge wrote that the state failed to specify what those violations were, saying the allegations were "so generic as to compel this Court" to quash the six charges. "The court's concern is less that the state has failed to allege sufficient conduct of the defendants — in fact, it has alleged an abundance. However, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is, in the undersigned's opinion, fatal," McAfee wrote. He said that though the six counts as written contain "all the essential elements of the crimes," they "fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission, i.e. the underlying felony solicited." Additionally, they don't give the defendants enough information to prepare their defenses "intelligently," McAfee wrote, as they could have violated Georgia and U.S. Constitutions "and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways." Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-georgia-case-some-charges-dismissed-2020-election/#

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee dismissed some charges against former President Trump and his co-defendants related to pressuring public officials to overturn the 2020 election, citing a lack of specificity from prosecutors. Three of Trump's charges were dropped, including one tied to his call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump's legal team viewed this as a positive development, although a former federal prosecutor noted it was only a partial victory, as the case remains largely intact. A significant decision is expected soon regarding the potential disqualification of District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who recently disclosed a romantic relationship. If disqualified, a new attorney could take over the case, possibly affecting its progress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Decades in jail. Here's CBS's Nicole Killian. Speaker 1: Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee threw out charges that accused former president Trump and several of his codefendants of pressuring public officers to violate their oaths as part of an alleged effort to overturn the 2020 election. McAfee said district attorney Fani Willis and her prosecutors were not specific enough about the violations, writing, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is fatal. Just 3 of Trump's 13 gowns were tossed, including one for his January 2021 phone call to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger. Speaker 2: I just wanna find, 11,000 780 votes. Speaker 1: Trump's legal team applauded the ruling. Speaker 0: It was a step in the right direction. It goes to the sloppiness of, frankly, the the prosecutors down there. Speaker 1: Former federal prosecutor Tom Dupree said it was only a partial victory for Trump. Speaker 2: Judge's decision effectively has the result of narrowing the case against Trump and the other defendants. It doesn't eliminate it entirely, though. Speaker 0: It is a lie. Speaker 1: McAfee's ruling comes ahead of a highly anticipated decision this week about whether Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade should be disqualified from the election interference case. Last month, the pair admitted to having a romantic relationship for about a year after Wade was hired, but denied any wrongdoing. Speaker 2: The romantic relationship ended before the indictment was returned. Yes or no? Speaker 0: To a man, yes. Speaker 1: The sprawling racketeering case against the former president and his associates remains largely intact. But if Willis is disqualified, another attorney could be assigned to the case, which could significantly impact the proceedings. Nora? Speaker 0: And potentially delay them. Nicole Killian, thank you so much.
Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Georgia. Judge. Fani Willis. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Judge rules Fani Willis can stay on Georgia case, but only if prosecutor steps down in [17] page ruling If Fani pack steps down. They would have to pick an entire team. That would delay the case indefinitely. So will she fire her prosecutor bae?

Video Transcript AI Summary
A major ruling has been made in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 co-defendants. Judge Scott McAfee has allowed Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis to remain on the case, although he noted an appearance of impropriety regarding her relationship with a prosecution team member, Nathan Wade. Trump’s attorneys argued for her disqualification based on this appearance, but the judge found no actual conflict of interest. Willis can either let Wade go or step aside with her entire office, but the case can proceed without significant delays. This outcome is seen as a positive for Willis, allowing her to continue without the complications of bringing in a new team.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News special report. Good morning. I'm Whit Johnson in New York, and we're coming on the air right now because there has been a major ruling in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 other codefendants. Judge Scott McAfee has just ruled Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis can remain on the case. So let's get right to our senior investigative correspondent, Aaron Koutierski. Because, Aaron, the way the judge laid this out here, there are multiple options to work with. Speaker 1: There are with because he did not totally clear the district attorney here in Fulton County from the whiff of but he said Donald Trump and some of his codefendants failed to show that there was an actual conflict of interest posed by her relationship with another member of the prosecution team, Nathan Wade, whom she hired to help run the case. But he did say there was an appearance of impropriety. And so while disqualification was not necessary, the judge did give options. The decision says the district attorney may choose to step aside along with the entirety of her office or she can let Nathan Wade go and the case can continue. So with the ball is now in Fani Willis' court to decide how to proceed. Speaker 0: Alright, Aaron. Stand by. Let's bring in Olivia Rubin, our investigative reporter. And, Olivia, I know you've been following this closely. Of course, the appearance of impropriety, this is exactly what Trump's attorneys and the attorneys of the other codefendants were trying to lay out. Speaker 2: It's exactly what Donald Trump's attorney, Steve Sadow, and many of the other defense attorneys told the judge should be enough to remove her from the case. They said that there is enough in Georgia law that should mean that an appearance of a conflict should get her kicked off, but that is exactly what the DA argued against, telling the judge immediately after we saw all of those, you know, high stakes evidentiary hearings saying that there is no case law that just an appearance of conflict should lead to a disqualification and urged the judge really, really in this I I think it was a 17 page filing saying there must be an actual conflict of interest. And as we just heard from Erin, the judge ultimately found that there was no actual conflict of interest, that the trips that they took together, that the money that was paid by Nathan Wheat's card, remember Fani Willis said she paid that back in cash, that she had no financial benefit, and that should dispel any idea that she had a financial stake in keeping the case going. So when the judge heard that, it seems that that seemed to dispel any notion that she had any sort of personal stake here. And I think it's likely that we're gonna hear from the DA that this is a win for her case. I think it's not, you know, the worst outcome that Nathan Wade, which is likely the option that they're going to choose, is going to have to step aside because the case will continue forward. Fonnie Willis can continue forward, and it does not have to get tied up now by this outside body having to pick an entirely new team to come in and pick up the case, probably delaying it indefinitely. So that has been avoided today if they take the option of Nathan Wade Wit.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Attorney. Michigan. Arrests. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in DC. Stefanie Lambert was arrested by the U.S. Marshals after a hearing over possible sanctions against her for disseminating confidential emails from Dominion Voting Systems, the target of conspiracy theories over former President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss. Lambert obtained the Dominion emails by representing Patrick Byrne, a prominent funder of election conspiracy theorists who are being sued by Dominion for defamation. Earlier Monday, Lambert had acknowledged passing on the records from Dominion Voting Systems to “law enforcement.” She then attached an affidavit that included some of the leaked emails and was signed by Dar Leaf, a county sheriff in northern Michigan who has investigated false claims of widespread election fraud from the 2020 election, to a filing in her own case in Michigan. The rest of the documents were posted to an account under Leaf’s name on X. Lambert contended that the Dominion documents obtained under discovery were evidence of “crimes” and needed to be disclosed. Dominion is trying their best to hide exculpatory evidence. If Dominion is not stopped. They will steal the election again. This means they will start another pandemic. To get massive mail-in ballots again. Patterns. Source: https://apnews.com/article/voting-machines-dominion-defamation-68d3f3a4e840ccb7a81d72837c4f6b3e?taid=65f8e50fa8059200016d3705&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in Washington, D.C. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. New York. Election interference intel: #BREAKING New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Trump's lawyers had asked to adjourn the New York trial indefinitely until Trump's immunity claim in his Washington, DC, election interference case was resolved Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan deemed Trump’s request untimely, ruling that his lawyers had plenty of opportunities to raise the immunity issue before they did earlier this month. "This Court finds that Defendant had myriad opportunities to raise the claim of presidential immunity well before March 7, 2024," Merchan wrote, adding that Trump and his lawyers could have made the argument on September 29, 2023, which he says was just six days before he made the same presidential immunity argument in Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Jan. 6 and election interference. Trump's trial begins on April 15th, 2024. The cabal will try and damage, sentence, and pass judgments by any means necessary up until the election Developing... Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-hush-money-trial-rejects-trumps-request-delay-scotus-rules-immunity

New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan has rejected the former president’s bid for a delay in the hush money trial until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on his immunity claims in another case. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Markers. COMMS. Trump. Trial. Judge. Courts. Denial. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Judge again declines Trump's latest appeal to delay NY hush money case A New York appeals court on Wednesday declined another bid by former President Trump to delay his hush money trial for the third time this week. The former president’s lawyers took aim at three rulings by Judge Juan Merchan: Refusing to recuse, not delaying the trial until the Supreme Court rules on Trump’s presidential immunity claim and requiring Trump to seek permission before filing new motions before trial. Trump is using a maneuver under New York state law, known as an Article 78 proceeding, that involves suing the judge over their decisions. The filings were placed under seal and are not publicly available. The Hill has requested comment from Trump’s lawyers. It marked the latest of a series of eleventh-hour efforts by Trump’s lawyers to stop jury selection from beginning Monday, which would mark the first criminal trial of a former president. The three appeals will now go to a full five-judge panel for consideration. The Octogon controls the judges, jury, and prosecutors. We'll see if the Supreme Court rules by Friday or Monday. Which is highly unlikely. If not, the trial will proceed. And then the only way the Supreme Court can rule is on appeal if found guilty. This would mean all appellate courts would have to deny the appeal first before ultimately bringing it before the Supreme Court. Most of the time, that process could take years. This is a sinister plot by the cabal. Developing... Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4586672-trumps-latest-hush-money-trial-delay-effort-denied-by-appeals-court/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Judge. Prosecution. Jury. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Begins With Jury Selection Here’s what else to know about Mr. Trump’s trial: This is the Manhattan criminal case against Mr. Trump, and it was brought by the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, a year ago. Mr. Trump is facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and, if convicted, could face up to four years in prison. The case, one of four indictments facing the former president and presumptive Republican nominee, may be the only one to make it to trial before Election Day. Jury selection will be crucial for both sides. Prosecutors have some advantage, as the jury pool is drawn from Manhattan, one of the most Democratic counties in America. Mr. Trump’s team will be looking for red needles in a blue haystack. Mr. Trump has twice sought Justice Merchan’s recusal, citing his daughter’s work as a Democratic political consultant. Justice Merchan has declined to step aside, noting a ruling by a judicial ethics commission that found his daughter’s work posed no conflict for him. “There is no agenda here,” Justice Merchan said in court on Monday, adding, “we want to follow the law, we want justice to be done.” Mr. Trump has also attacked the judge’s daughter on social media. Hundreds of potential jurors have been summoned. Those who say they cannot be fair or otherwise serve are being excused, and the remaining prospective jurors will answer 42 questions compiled before the trial. Lawyers on both sides will be able to remove a limited number of them without explanation. The lawyers can also ask to remove a potential juror “for cause” by providing specific reasons they believe that person cannot be fair. In addition to the payment to Ms. Daniels, Mr. Bragg’s office is expected to highlight two other deals involving The National Enquirer, a tabloid that has longstanding ties to Mr. Trump. In one deal, the tabloid bought the silence of a man who had heard that Mr. Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock, a rumor that turned out to be false, and in the other, it paid Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, who wanted to sell her story of an affair with Mr. Trump. The prosecution’s witness list is expected to include David Pecker, the former publisher of The National Enquirer, as well as Hope Hicks, a former aide to Mr. Trump. Ms. Daniels and Ms. McDougal could also testify.■ The judge contends that if Trump misses any day of the trial, he will be arrested and sent to jail. Developing... Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/15/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial

No Jurors Picked on First Day of Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Donald J. Trump faces charges he falsified business records to cover up a sex scandal while serving as president. More than half of the first group of prospective jurors was dismissed almost immediately. nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Comms. Trump. Judge. New York. Prison. Trial intel: #BREAKING New York judge says Trump can't attend Supreme Court arguments on presidential immunity The New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s hush money trial said Monday that Trump can not attend arguments on presidential immunity at the Supreme Court next week. It came after the judge earlier delayed a decision on allowing Trump to attend his son Barron’s high school graduation in May. The decision to not allow Trump to be in Washington, D.C., on April 25, when the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a presidential immunity claim Trump is making in his federal criminal case, came just before the New York trial adjourned Monday. “Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal, and I can certainly appreciate why your client would want to be there, but a trial in New York Supreme Court … is also a big deal,” Judge Juan Merchan said to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, rejecting his request to let the former president play hooky.■ These are further comms suggesting that the judge, jurors, and prosecution are in cohoots with the Octogon. I definitely don't trust this magi judge. Protected. Well insulated. Are prison comms. Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4595849-ny-judge-trump-supreme-court-presidential-immunity/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump & Barron: #BREAKING A Heartbroken Trump just wrote: "Who will explain for me, to my wonderful son, Barron, who is a GREAT Student at a fantastic School, that his Dad will likely not be allowed to attend his Graduation Ceremony, something that we have been talking about for years, because a seriously Conflicted and Corrupt New York State Judge wants me in Criminal Court on a bogus “Biden Case” which, according to virtually all Legal Scholars and Pundits, has no merit, and should NEVER have been brought. "This Fake Case is solely meant to attack Crooked Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME, who is seriously leading him in the Polls, for purposes of Election Interference. The Judge, Juan Merchan, is preventing me from proudly attending my son’s Graduation. Seems very unfair, doesn’t it? But this whole event is unfair. Every one of the many Fake Cases that are perpetuated by the White House in order to help the Worst President in History, by far, get Re-Elected, are UNJUST SCAMS. We won’t let that happen, but we will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" The cabal is doing Trump dirty. Karma. The cabal will get theirs in the end. Justice can't come quick enough.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jurors. New York. Election Interference intel: #BREAKING Lawyers has completed their selection of12 jurors to serve in Trump hush-money case Lawyers in Donald Trump's historic criminal trial on Thursday selected 12 jurors who will assess his guilt or innocence over the coming weeks in a case stemming from a hush-money payment to a porn star. Lawyers for the defense and the prosecution still in their selection phase. Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-hush-money-jury-selection-resumes-lawyers-probe-bias-2024-04-18/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. NY AG. Letitia James. Octogon intel: #BREAKING New York AG Letitia James asks the judge to void Trump's bond over his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. In a 26-page filing ahead of a pre-scheduled hearing on Monday, James expressed concern about whether Knight Specialty Insurance Company could secure the $175 million bond. She also argued that the collateral put up by the former president should be under the full control of the company. One of James' concerns about KSIC is that the insurer "is not authorized to write business in New York and thus not regulated by the state’s insurance department." She added that the company "had never before written a surety bond in New York or in the prior two years in any other jurisdiction and has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million." Developing... Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/york-ag-letitia-james-asks-233142759.html

New York AG Letitia James asks judge to void Trump's bond in his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. yahoo.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The court has upheld the $175 million bond tied to Trump. Friday, I reported that James was challenging the court to not accept Trumps $175 million payment. The court rejected James' motion. Who doesn't want $175 million?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: A court has ruled that Trump's $175 million bond will remain in place, despite challenges from New York Attorney General Letitia James. Former federal prosecutor Tchaikovsky indicated that this ruling is likely to hold up. James argued that the insurance company backing the bond might lack sufficient resources for an appeal, but the court disagreed. The bond must be held in cash, not in fluctuating assets like mutual funds or securities. Knight Insurance will manage the account and provide monthly financial statements to the attorney general, confirming the $175 million is secured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. So here's the breaking news. And the former federal prosecutor, Tchaikovsky, and I were just talking about this, and he said this was not gonna hold up. He said Trump's gonna be fine. So the court has just ruled that the bond, that $175,000,000 bond that Trump put up will stand despite the fight that the woman on the right, Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, was trying to slide in. And and what did Cherkowsky call it? He called it she was trying to play a legal technicality, saying that the insurance company that Trump was using wasn't going to have the resources to back up that bond should he fail an appeal. Well, the court says the bond can stay. 175,000,000 needs to be in cash, not mutual funds or securities where value can fluctuate. Knight Insurance cannot trade or move the money, but they will have control of the account and will provide a monthly financial statement to the attorney general showing $175,000,000 in

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Memo. Judge. Orders. Patriot intel: #REPORT Trump just released this memo hours ago. It's a comm. This will set the precedent on how this trial will go and his remaining 4 trials.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Immunity. Precedents. Trump. Supreme Court. Future comms intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court case set to argue about immunity for President Trump The Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted over his efforts to undo his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden. The case, to be argued Thursday, stems from Trump’s attempts to have charges against him dismissed. Lower courts have found he cannot claim immunity for actions that, prosecutors say, illegally sought to interfere with the election results. The Republican ex-president has been charged in federal court in Washington with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, one of four criminal cases he is facing. A trial has begun in New York over hush money payments to a porn star to cover up an alleged sexual encounter. The Supreme Court is moving faster than usual in taking up the case, though not as quickly as special counsel Jack Smith wanted, raising questions about whether there will be time to hold a trial before the November election, if the justices agree with lower courts that Trump can be prosecuted. The patterns suggest that Trump will not get immunity from prosecution. What does this mean and why does it matters? This will set future direction to go after all of the other living presidents. But unfortunately, it'll have to start with Trump. The letter of the law has to be followed, especially because of this corrupt 2 tired justice system. Every T crossed. Every I dotted. Every R and N cannot be run together. Think rn = m. Think corney/comey. If everything is not done right. This nation is over. You will have new foreign occupants in the Whitehouse. You think no one is fighting back now? No one will definitely fight back then. Our nation stands on the precipice. Source: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-immunity-prosecution-capitol-riot-9fd5dc5947dab82bbd18d3efcb4267d8

What to know in the Supreme Court case about immunity for former President Trump The core issue being debated before the Supreme Court on Thursday boils down to whether a former president is immune from prosecution for actions taken while in office. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Secrets service. Trump. Trial. Arrest comms: #BREAKING Secret Service prepares if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case The U.S. Secret Service held meetings and started planning for what to do if former President Donald Trump were to be held in contempt in his criminal hush money trial and Judge Juan Merchan opted to send him to short-term confinement, officials familiar with the situation told ABC News. Merchan on Tuesday reserved a decision on the matter after a contentious hearing. Prosecutors said at this point they are seeking a fine. “We are not yet seeking an incarceratory penalty," assistant district attorney Chris Conroy said, "But the defendant seems to be angling for that." Officials do not necessarily believe Merchan would put Trump in a holding cell in the courthouse, but they are planning for contingencies, the officials said. There have not been discussions yet about what to do if Trump is convicted and sentenced to prison. Developing... Source: https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-services-prepares-potential-trump-contempt-order-hush/story?id=109542824

Secret Service prepares for if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case Judge Merchan on Tuesday reserved decision after a contentious hearing. abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Immunity. Clarence Thomas. Trial intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised the question to Trump’s lawyers if they have challenged special counsel Jack Smith's authority to bring charges against the former president, which could provide a loophole that may disqualify Smith. Mr. Sauer said that Trump attorneys have not raised such concerns "directly" in the current case at the Supreme Court however, Trump’s attorney John Sauer agrees with the "analysis provided by AG Edwin Meese and AG Michael B. Mukasey," referring to the amicus brief the two former attorneys general submitted to the Supreme Court on March 19. In the brief, the two attorneys general argue that Mr. Smith "does not have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution." Developing... Source: leadingreport

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jury. Deliberations. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury Now Deliberating In Trump’s Hush Money Trial—And Trump Can’t Leave Until There’s A Verdict Jurors began deliberating Wednesday over whether former President Donald Trump should be criminally convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, bringing nearly six weeks of testimony and arguments in the historic trial to an end—though it’s unclear how long it will take them to reach a verdict. Jurors started deliberating at approximately 11:30 a.m. Eastern time Wednesday after Judge Juan Merchan delivered the jury instructions, following closing arguments on Tuesday that stretched into the evening hours. Parties in the case—including Trump—can’t leave the courthouse during the jury’s deliberations until there’s a verdict, Merchan told the parties. All parties, including the Jurors, can not leave until a verdict is made. Developing... Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/05/29/jury-now-deliberating-in-trumps-hush-money-trial/?sh=2ab9e5bf23c0

Jury Won’t Reach Verdict In Trump Trial Today As Court Ends For The Day It’s unclear how long it could take the jury to reach a verdict. forbes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Judge. Jury. Octogon intel: The cabal are desperately trying by any means necessary to find Trump guilty of any offense so they can sentence him to prison. #BREAKING The judge in Trump's case tells jurors they could be split ‘4-4-4,’ and he will still treat them as unanimous verdicts This is insane!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge has indicated that jurors do not need to agree on the specific crime involved in the case, which is unprecedented. In typical criminal cases, jurors must unanimously agree on the elements of the offense, such as intent and the nature of the crime. Here, the key element that elevates the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony is the concealment of another crime. The judge's ruling allows for disagreement among jurors about what that other crime is, which undermines the basis for the felony charge. This is significant because the case could not have been pursued as a misdemeanor due to the statute of limitations expiring in 2019, making the felony charge crucial for the prosecution's ability to proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First could do. He just delivered, what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. He said that there is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 444 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's really outrageous because in a normal criminal case, every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case, it's, you know, you have to rob. It's gotta be a financial institution. You have to show intent. Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that were that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony because, remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime. And here, the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, what makes it a 4 year potential prison penalty rather than, a year or less, but it's also what gets us into the courtroom. Because if if this had been a misdemeanor, the the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. So the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly, and yet now the judge is saying Speaker 0: That these jurors could do.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jurors just rang the courtroom! Either they have a question or verdict. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Jury asks the judge a question via note: They asked for a witness testimony transcript from former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury just asked to rehear the judge’s instructions. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The kury in the Trump trial was dismissed for the day. The court resumes tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. ET. Apparently, the jury can only leave if the judge dismisses them. I will post all updates as they come in on this thread. Be sure to bookmark all pills and all threads.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE These are the jury instructions from the judge: 👇

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING Media. Trump and team head back into the courtroom. Could be another jury question. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Chaos continues to ensue outside of the courthouse. Apparently, according to the reporters emails. The people returning back to the courtroom were from a lunch break. Credit: NYP

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Soc media. Judge. Corruption. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Trump just posted minutes ago on his app Truth Social and went in on judge Merchan Will the jury reach a verdict at 6pm? 6 o'clock can be dangerous.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury doesn't want to stay until 6pm today. The judge left it up to them. Jury is said to leave 430pm est. No verdict is expected today. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

I strongly believe the jurors have already made their decision. And going home early to marinate on it. They'll return tmr with a Not Guilty verdict.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING VERDICT REACHED IN TRUMP TRIAL!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING TRUMP FOUND GUILTY ON ALL 34 COUNTS!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Verdict. Sentencing. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trimp sentencing is set for July 11th, 2024. The probation interview is being set, too. Judge just told the jury there free to discuss the trial with anyone. The verdict shouldn't surprise anyone. These are Octogon courts. Their minds were already set. The Octogon controls the judges, courts, jurors, prosecutors, district attorneys. The cabal needs Trump out of the way by any means necessary. Cabal is not going down without a fight. Trumps other trials will be similar. This entire fiasco has to play itself out between now and election day. That's if there is an election. I've been telling you they're poised to take it again. Bidan won't make it. Harris becomes president and names Gavin Newsom her VP. Pandemic part 2 is already slated. The summer war has already been set. This is all corruption to high firmament. Where do we go from here? Prep. That's all I'm going to say publicly.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump COMMS: #BREAKING Trump donation page crashed shortly after the verdict was read The sentencing date is 4 days before the GOP Convention on July 18th, where they officially nominate Trump for president.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Rulings. MI Intel: #BREAKING Trump wins Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. Will delay Trumps cases until November and beyond. Major blow to the prosecution[s] Supreme Court Ruling: Trump v. United States (23-939) The nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority; he is also entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts; there is no immunity for unofficial acts.■ I've told everyone since the beginning. The SC ruling is very important and that it would go in Trump's favor. Why? Because military tribunals are needed. If Trumps presidential immunity wasn't granted. This would mean the cabal presidency of Bidan. Obama. Bush. Clinton. Would also be brought up on indictments and charges. That can't happen. Why? We have a double jeopardy law. This means someone can't be charged with the same crime twice. The Octogon Group controls the courts, judges, jurors, lawyers, prosecutors, and politicians. So yes, it would've been nice to have them all publicly charged, indicted, and arrested. But all of them would've been cleared of everything. These deepstate cabal[Octogon] members have to be tried in military tribunals. That's the only way to legally and lawfully end this deepstate cabal in America. This ruling should come as no surprise to those who have been following the patterns. Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/

Home - Supreme Court of the United States supremecourt.gov

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. COMMS. Sentencing. Judges. Patriot intel: #REPORT Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. The sentencing hearing, previously scheduled for July 11, will now take place Sept. 18 at the earliest, according to a letter posted on the court's docket. The delay guarantees that Trump won't be sentenced until after he is formally nominated for president at the Republican National Convention, which begins July 15, and that sentencing will happen less than two months before the presidential election. This is perfect timing, actually. It gives us a chance to prep and finish up your preps before all hell breaks loose. At the same time, it's giving the cabal the opportunity to get their black operations together. As they prepare for Trump to retake the throne. Be ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-trumps-hush-money-trial-delays-sentencing-supreme-court-immunity-rcna160028

Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

🚨GOOD NEWS ALERT!🚨 Courts. Judges. Trump. Classified. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Judge dismisses Trump "classified documents" case A Trump-appointed judge in Florida has dismissed the criminal case against Donald Trump that charged him with illegally holding on to classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The US district judge Aileen Cannon made the ruling after a hearing in which the former president’s legal team urged her to drop the charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith, and notably, after the supreme court said the president has immunity for official acts. Trump’s team had argued that he is the victim of selective prosecution and is being targeted by Democrats as he seeks to regain the presidency. A huge win against the cabal! Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/15/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-speech-milwaukee-shooting-joe-biden-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Trump joins crowd at Republican convention hall with bandaged ear, in first public appearance since assassination attempt – as it happened Ex-president emerges to cheers and chants of ‘USA! USA! USA!’ as he appears amid supporters theguardian.com
Travis_in_Flint
Posted - October 11, 2023 at 11:32 PM
Saved - October 12, 2023 at 2:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
New York AG Leticia James presented a banking executive as a witness in the Trump case. However, the executive didn't claim any harm, stating that he approved loans based on Trump's credibility and property valuations. This case seems baseless, wasting time on protecting banks' interests instead of more pressing matters. End this charade.

@Travis_in_Flint - 🇺🇸Travis🇺🇸

It finally happened. New York AG Leticia James finally brought a victim out in the Trump case. It was a banking executive who works for a multi billion dollar bank. Even worse for James, he didn’t even say he was hurt. He just said he approved the loans because he knew Trump would pay them back and they accepted his teams valuation on his properties. This is the biggest joke ever. No case. End this charade now. New York has more important things to worry about than protecting the interest rates of billion dollar banks.

SaltyGoat17
Posted - October 21, 2023 at 9:11 PM
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 9:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The judge in Trump's NY case, who valued Mar-A-Largo at $18M, has a God Complex. He dismisses juries, makes things up based on hearsay. The silver lining? The appeal will be simple. Trump2024. And yes, this judge deserves strong criticism.

@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat

Oh y'all gotta see this!!! THIS👇🏽is the judge presiding over Trump's NY case... Ya know... the one they valued Mar-A-Largo at $18M!!🙄 Anyway, take a listen to him speak. He literally... Has a God Complex like I've never seen Apparently sees no use for juries in this country Just makes shit up as he goes along based on hearsay Well there is one good thing about having this moron as the judge... The appeal will be ASTONISHINGLY SIMPLE!!! 🇺🇸🔥Trump2024🔥🇺🇸 Oh ya... And FUCK THIS GUY!!!🖕🏽

Video Transcript AI Summary
Juries often make mistakes, in my opinion. As a civil trial judge, I have a tool called "jury notwithstanding the verdict judgment" to address this. It allows me to question if a reasonable jury would have reached the same conclusion. However, it's challenging to separate my emotions from the process. Sometimes, someone may argue that a case is similar to another, but I have to consider even minor differences, like the color of clothing. In the past, I worked briefly as a journalist and faced criticism for reporting on Ku Klux Klan murders. People questioned my credibility since I wasn't present, but that was the general belief at the time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Juries get it wrong a lot. That's my own opinion. I do only civil trials. Well, I have a I have a tool that I can deal with. It's called jury notwithstanding the verdict judgment notwithstanding the verdict. I can say there is no possible way that a reasonable jury would have reached that conclusion. And alright, am I following the law or am I making law? But it's hard to factor out my own emotions. And I have tools. Somebody can say, well, your honor, you have to throw out this case because it's just like another case. Well, is it just like another case? What if the defendant was wearing a red sweater instead of a blue sweater? And by the way, I worked for the Columbia Daily Spectator for a couple of weeks, and I wrote a few stories. 1 I got criticized on because I wrote that some Ku Klux Klaners had murdered some people. And and I was told, you can't say that. How do we know? You aren't there. Well, that was what everybody thought.
BurninTRanch
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 10:00 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 3:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The civil trial of DJT in New York reveals that banks were advised to verify financial valuations. Letitia James' lawsuit raises questions. NYU professor Eli Bartov found no accounting errors. Filing for summary judgement and appealing Engoron's decision seems necessary. This man disgraces the bench.

@BurninTRanch - Burnin_T_Ranch

I am not sure how closely anyone is paying attention to the civil trial of DJT in New York, but it is being reported that every financial statement provided to the banks had a disclosure statement that the banks should verify the valuations for themselves. Ummmm how does Letitia James even bring this lawsuit? Additionally New York University accounting professor Eli Bartov found that there were no accounting errors in the fillings. Universities in New York tend to not like DJT. They need to file for a motion of summary judgement and when Engoron finds against him, move straight to the apelet court. This man is a disgrace to the bench.

CrayonMurders
Posted - December 12, 2023 at 1:10 AM
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 5:01 AM

@CrayonMurders - Murdered By Crayons 🖍️

I can’t imagine being on this clown’s legal team. I’ve no doubt they hit the bar heavily on the way to the bank. Now he’s accusing DIICOT of falsifying evidence. 🫠 https://t.co/nCMhCFIcVg

patrickbetdavid
Posted - February 17, 2024 at 2:44 AM
Saved - February 17, 2024 at 9:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump has been ordered to pay a significant amount of money, potentially depleting a portion of his net worth. The decision raises concerns about the impact on future candidates and their families. It may discourage potential candidates, create distance within families, and make candidates reconsider their decision to run. However, it could also energize a new generation to fight for the values of the nation. The fight for freedom requires courage and may not be for everyone.

@patrickbetdavid - Patrick Bet-David

Let’s do some math. President Trump has been ordered to pay $83.3m and $354m. Combined its $437m. Including interest, it could be another $100m. His net worth is estimated to be between $2b to $2.6b. That’s estimated to be between 21% to 27% of his net worth. However, experts have claimed that Trump has somewhere between $600m to $700m is in cash. Trump has said that he only has $400m in cash. This may seem like a lot to the average person but not when you’re being asked to pay $537m in damages + interest. This doesn’t include the legal fees that have been pilling up as well as the fines his two sons received. If he chooses to appeal, he would have to secure a bond by putting up about 10% of the total amount owed. That could be $44m which he may not get back. In other words, this non sense decision and insane dollar amount by the judge could deplete Trump’s savings anywhere from (-$137m) to $163m. Love him or hate him, this is what it means. 1. Thirty years from now, a woman can come out and falsely claim allegations against YOU, and if the judge hates your politics, they will believe her and made up any number to destroy your life savings. 2. If you build your wealth through real estate, and pay back all your commitments to banks, buyers and sellers, a judge who hates your politics could make up any number to deplete YOUR life savings and prevent you from doing business. So what does this do to capitalists and those with aspirations to run in the future. 1. Scare the crap out of great future candidates. 2. Eliminate anyone’s family from supporting their father or mother from running. 3. Distance family members from those who choose to run to avoid being sued. Notice which of Trumps kids got sued and who didn’t. 4. Make the candidate rethink why they ever chose to run in the first place and ruin the lifestyle of the rich and famous they once had. Or last but not least it could ENERGIZE an entire new generation who love 🇺🇸 to realize how much trouble she’s in to fight like hell and defend the the values this nation was built on. This requires a certain level of courage that words can’t describe. This won’t be a fight for everyone. You’re going to have to have a few screws missing to get in this fight. But what is FREEDOM worth to YOU? That’s the most important question one has to ask. God is good. Future looks bright!

JonathanTurley
Posted - February 19, 2024 at 5:39 PM
Saved - February 20, 2024 at 1:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent $455 million judgment against Trump requires him to come up with that amount or a bond to appeal. The discretion of figures like James in New York raises concerns for businesses.

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

The NY Post is out with my column on the poison pill contained in the recent $455 million judgment against Trump. In order to appeal, he has to come up with that amount or a bond for that amount. Justice Engoron proved that "nothing succeeds like excess.” https://nypost.com/2024/02/19/opinion/democrats-weaponized-justice-system-to-punish-trump-in-business-case/

Democrats weaponized justice system to punish Trump in business case Oscar Wilde wrote "moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess." Judge Arthur Engoron took that line to heart with his absurd imposition of $455 million in fines and interest against Donald Trump and his corporation. nypost.com

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

...Of course, Gov. Hochul is suggesting that you have nothing to fear from such confiscatory actions unless you are Trump in New York. However, if the only protection in New York is the discretion of figures like James, few businesses would relish the future.

kevinolearytv
Posted - February 20, 2024 at 8:14 PM
Saved - February 22, 2024 at 5:33 AM

@kevinolearytv - Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

Had an interesting conversation with @thelauracoates She is a rising star in the new @cnn lineup. She is also a lawyer so she knows exactly what is at stake in #NY States $355 million penalty decision and what it means for New York's ability to compete in the future #loser states https://t.co/YJmlvQyHwq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kevin O'Leary discusses the $355 million fine on Trump, questioning the impact on NY's reputation. He argues the case sets a dangerous precedent for developers. O'Leary emphasizes the need for better management in NY to avoid becoming unattractive to investors. He criticizes the judge's decision, highlighting the lack of financial loss and the potential consequences for entrepreneurship in America. The conversation shifts to the appeals process and the uncertainty surrounding future prosecutions in NY. O'Leary dismisses the idea of buying gold sneakers and prefers collecting watches. The interview ends with a discussion on business and branding.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, let's bring in the chairman of O'Leary Ventures, Shark Tank Judge Kevin O'Leary. Kevin, so good to see you this evening. I mean, let me just jump right in here. Last time you and I spoke about the possibility of what the fine could be in this case, we now know what it is. It's more than $350,000,000 That's a huge financial hit, and I'm I'm wondering, where is he gonna get this money? Speaker 1: Actually, it's closer to half a 1000000000 with a 9% interest, assuming it'll take 18 to 2 years to actually settle this in an appeal, which I think it should be appealed. He'll work hard to raise it. I think he can do it. But I don't think this case is about Trump anymore at all, because you heard the governor of New York come out yesterday and say, look, everybody, don't be scared about doing business in New York, because the only people we prosecute are people like Donald Trump who don't behave well. That didn't go over very well with the investment community because we're all asking each other, who's next? This was a victimless crime. Nobody lost any money. And a judge out of nowhere put on a $355,000,000 penalty. I mean, who's next? So if you Speaker 0: think about the before I I don't wanna cut you off, but I hear about the the so called victim as crimes, but the laws on the books, falsification of business records and second degree, issuing false financial statements, insurance fraud, conspiracy, and all these different aspects of it, those are actual crimes. I take it your point is that these should not have been prosecuted? Speaker 1: Well, my point is there's never been a case like this in 75 years. Everything you just listed off is done by every real estate developer everywhere on earth in every city. This has never ever been prosecuted. But here's the real point that people in New York should concern themselves with. You can put your money anywhere. I'm a real estate developer. Do you think that I would ever take a chance on New York again? New York is turning itself into a flyover state. If I were New York today and I was living there, I would ask myself, maybe we should hire better management. Why is this happening to us? Why are we becoming a flyover state? Why are investors concerned about putting their money there? Speaker 0: But shouldn't you ask them wouldn't wouldn't those people also be saying, first of all, I do wonder how many people take issue with the idea that every investor is engaged in falsifying business records, that every investor is engaged in what has been accused of Donald Trump and the Trump Organization. Speaker 1: Excuse me. What fraud? I don't I this is not about Trump anymore. When you get a developer when you get a developer that builds a building and he says it's worth $400,000,000 and he wants to borrow 200,000,000 from a bank, which happens every day, everywhere on earth, including every American city, every developer is an entrepreneur. They shine the light on their building, and they say it's worth 400. The bank does its own due diligence as was done in this case because they're very good at it. The banks are very good, and they say, no. It's worth 300. We're only going to loan you 150,000,000. That haddling has gone on for decades. That's how it works. And then in this case, even the bank that was supposedly defrauded testified and said, we didn't lose anything. We want to do business with this guy again. We'd like to, but the judge said, no. No. No. No. No. No. Let's penalize this developer for 355,000,000. And if we're going to do that, let's penalize all the developers all across America. They've all done the same thing. All of them should go to jail, and we should stop building buildings. That's what the message is from New York. Even the governor herself is concerned about what this looks like to investors all around the world. It's not just US domestic. All around the world, people are talking about what happened here. You really think people want to invest money in New York after this? How about we go somewhere else? I think there are people Speaker 0: who would I don't wanna cut you off, but I I wanna converse with you as Seth. Speaker 1: Just did. Speaker 0: I it's only because I wanna have a conversation, Kevin. I respect you. To just Speaker 1: having you tell me because you're a lawyer. You're a lawyer. You understand exactly what I'm talking about. Speaker 0: I gotta tell you, I'm respectable for a number of reasons, Kevin O'Leary, but being a lawyer is one of those issues. But I'll tell you, when I when I hear your conversation, and I do wanna converse with you about this point. Speaker 1: Well, I ask you who lost money, and I'll make it even clearer. You and I, we're developing a data center together. And I say to you, we can go to New York where this just happened. It's your money now. You're now an investor and you're taking risk. You're an entrepreneur with me right beside me. We're together on the deal. Or I can show you Oklahoma, North Dakota, West Virginia, where the governors actually ran businesses. Let's go there where this never happened before. They have power. They have permits. They've got legislation that's supportive of entrepreneurship. Why would we go to New York? Why take the risk? My only point is, did we just diminish the great state of New York and the great people of New York, and shouldn't they ask for better management so they don't become a flyover state? Remember, New York has the highest taxes in the country, the worst regulatory environment, and it's incredibly mismanaged. And I'm pointing out now on top of that, you get this insanity, a victimless crime. And forget about Trump. It's not about Trump. I don't care about Trump in this. I care about America, and I care about entrepreneurship, and I care about democracy and the fairness. The judicial system is now being criticized. People are asking themselves, the bar of New York, is this judge rational to charge 355,000,000 in a case where no one lost any money? Is that good for the people of New York? Should the people of New York wake up to this and say, what's happening to us? Why is this becoming so perverse? Why are we the focus of this injustice? And I have nothing to do with Trump. I'm not supporting Trump. I'm supporting American entrepreneurship. And New York is slowly becoming the number one loser state in America. I'm sorry. That's what's happening. Speaker 0: Well, that's news to the city that doesn't sleep, but I'll tell you what, the governor has said that legitimate business operations have nothing to worry about. I, as an attorney, am looking at this issue, wondering what the appeals process will look like because they're going to delve into that very topic that you have raised. They're going to talk about perhaps the novelty of this being as you describe, not brought on behalf of, you know, unsophisticated consumers who may have been duped, but decisions made by loan entities who wanted to engage in business with this particular organization. That'll be more important. Go ahead. Put your hand up. Speaker 1: My hand. I want to put up my hand and ask governor, who's next? Who are you going after next? Speaker 0: You want your hand up for that, Kevin? Put your hand down if that's the question. Speaker 1: What do you mean? Every every entrepreneur in New York is saying, am I next? Who's next? Speaker 0: Well, let me ask you this, because I you don't wanna talk about Trump, but I have to ask you because you're a businessman who likes to talk about licensing. Do you currently own or will you be buying one of these gold sneakers? Speaker 1: Thank you. No. It's very expensive. Very expensive. But you have to hand it to the branding. Yeah. Okay. You have to hand it. I collect watches. 2 of them right here. I'd rather buy a watch. Speaker 0: Do you have 2 watches? Okay. Well, you know what time it is. Alright. Fine. Kevin O'Leary, I'll let you and your 2 watches go. We'll talk again. There'll be other times for us to speak. Thanks, Kevin. Speaker 1: Take care. Bye bye.
JonathanTurley
Posted - February 28, 2024 at 9:06 PM
Saved - February 28, 2024 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Anil Singh's order lifts the ban on Trump taking out loans from NY banks and serving as an officer of a NY company. Banks expressed interest in doing business with Trump, but a bond would still be costly. Trump faces challenges in securing a loan to avoid selling properties at a low price. Banks must consider the risks involved in this unique case. Trump may appeal the deposit issue while exploring loan or bond options.

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

The order of Judge Anil Singh stays the ban over Trump from taking out loans from New York banks and the ban on serving as an officer of a New York company. That leaves him with an astronomical bond burden but gives him more leeway in financing this critical deposit...

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

...Notably, the witnesses for banks said that they did not lose any money on the prior deals and wanted more business with Trump. This will give banks that opportunity. Notably, a bond would still cost Trump a considerable amount even if he prevails. https://jonathanturley.org/2024/02/21/nothing-succeeds-like-excess-new-yorks-perverse-incentive-in-pricing-trump-out-of-an-appeal/

“Nothing Succeeds Like Excess”: New York’s Perverse Incentive in Pricing Trump Out of an Appeal Below is my column in the New York Post on the confiscatory fines imposed on former president Donald Trump and his family and corporation. Democrats are thrilled by the over the $450 million bill facing Trump and the possibility that he could be forced to sell off property just to seek an appeal. On ABC,… jonathanturley.org

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

...The problem with the full deposit demand is that there is limited time remaining and the added $90 million for the Carroll case appeal. It is not clear if or how Trump can collateralize his properties for a loan to avoid a distress price sale of properties...

@JonathanTurley - Jonathan Turley

...This remains a daunting burden. Banks may have to weigh the merits of a novel case to judge the risk. Ordinarily, such risk or unknowns impact the conditions of the loan. Trump could take a further appeal on the deposit issue but he is presumably working the market for a loan or bond.

USA_Anne711
Posted - March 25, 2024 at 6:02 PM
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 6:52 PM

@USA_Anne711 - ❣️Anne❣️

Trump responds to the ruling by the NY Appeals Court: "…New York State is being battered by his decision so I greatly respect the decision of the appellate division and I'll post either $175 million in cash or bonds or security or whatever is necessary very quickly within the ten days…”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Judge Jed Goran's decision in New York is criticized for allowing crime to flourish. The speaker plans to post $175 million in cash or bonds within 10 days, respecting the appellate division's decision. They believe the judge is a disgrace and should not be allowed to make such decisions again.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Judge Jed Goran has done a terrible disservice to the state of New York. What he's done is terrible business as a fling. You see that? You just released a statement on food. Business is a fling and crime is flourishing all over the state, and what he's done is such a disservice and should never be allowed to happen again. New York state is being battered by his decision. So I greatly respect the decision of the appellate division. Now I'll post either a $175,000,000,000 in cash or bonds or security or whatever is necessary, very quickly within the 10 days. And I thank the appellate division for acting quickly. But judge enduring is a disgrace to this country, and this should not be allowed to happen. Thank you very much.
DecentBackup
Posted - July 14, 2024 at 3:20 AM
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 11:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss various individuals and organizations, including the Secret Service, Pfizer, and the Carlyle Group. There are mentions of connections between these entities and figures like Michael Bloomberg and Reid Hoffman. The posts also speculate on potential crimes and the desire to avoid accountability.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

💥💥💥💥💥💥 SECRET SERVICE 💥💥💥💥💥💥 ✅Anthony Guglielmi *The U.S. SS CHIEF OF COMMUNICATIONS Officer who put out this statement was previously the LEGISLATIVE COMMUNICATIONS ADVISOR for PFIZER. Interesting shit, folks. REEEAL interesting.

@Amy31129057 - QuestionIt

Secret Service Press Statement

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

✅Brian S. Lambert *The U.S. SS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR for the OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS started his career in 1999 in the NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE. *Served as ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR of COUNTERINTELLIGENCE for DHS and on the PROTECTIVE DETAILS of GEORGE W. BUSH and BARACK OBAMA.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

✅David M. Torres *ASSISTANT DIRECTOR in the OFFICE OF STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATION, and served on PROTECTIVE DETAIL for PRESIDENTS GEORGE W. BUSH and BARACK OBAMA. *Led the WILMINGTON, DELAWARE FIELD OFFICE as the RESIDENT AGENT IN CHARGE.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

💥ANTHONY GUGLIELMI: https://www.secretservice.gov/about/leadership/doc 💥BRIAN S. LAMBERT: https://www.secretservice.gov/about/leadership/inv 💥DAVID M. TORRES: https://www.secretservice.gov/about/leadership/sii

Chief of CommunicationsLock The Chief of Communications for the U.S. Secret Service is responsible for leading the agency’s public affairs program and team of communication professionals. secretservice.gov
Brian S. LambertLock Assistant Director Brian S. Lambert, Office of Investigations Brian S. Lambert, a native of Richmond, VA, was appointed to the Senior Executive Service (SES) in 2017. He presently serves as the 29th Assistant Director of the Office of Investigations. secretservice.gov
Assistant Director, Office of Strategic Intelligence and InformationLock Assistant Director David M. Torres,Office of Strategic Intelligence and Information David M. Torres has been a member of the Senior Executive Service since 2018 and was appointed as the Assistant Director of the Office of Strategic Intelligence and Information in March 2022. secretservice.gov

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Hey, ALBERT BOURLA, what’s all this about? https://t.co/VKztXyMwUl

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

CARLYLE GROUP and BALTIMORE, MD: Ian Read (Pfizer) and David Rubenstein (Orioles; Johns Hopkins University; CFR; Dominion Voting; etc.)

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Speaking of SECRET SERVICE, PFIZER and BALTIMORE… perhaps we should ask our CARLYLE GROUP homies about it. Yo, IAN READ (PFIZER) and DAVID RUBENSTEIN (ORIOLES; JHU), what’s all this about? https://t.co/d0S4kntXWI

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

HOW IT STARTED: Your. Boy. Does. Not. Miss.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

💥SPOILERS: It’s gonna be tied to SECRET SERVICE, so you wanna look in the direction of FinCEN, INTEGRITY INITIATIVE (DHS), GCHQ, K2 INTEGRITY, CIA/MOSSAD. JULES AND JEREMY KROLL, HAMA DAS & JOEL AND JONATHAN GREENBLATT should make damn sure their affairs are in order right now. https://t.co/O1Pjt4TcZ1

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

HOW COULD I POSSIBLY HAVE KNOWN MICHAEL BLOOMBERG WOULD BE CLOSELY TIED IN HERE?!😒 https://t.co/45Wb6yJ0f8

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

*SECRET SERVICE and K12 INC… K12 INC. changed its name to STRIDE INC., effective DECEMBER 2020. BOARD OF DIRECTORS: ✅STEVEN FINK, CEO LAWRENCE INVESTMENTS *BROTHER of LARRY FINK (BlackRock)! ✅ROBERT KNOWLING JR, CEO NYC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY *Founded by MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG! https://t.co/lxCKE3iRyV

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

I dunno, guys. I’d bet it probably has something to do with several of these same satanic, ultra-wealthy Jews wanting to avoid an obvious DEATH PENALTY for having committed the most heinous, egregious crimes in both AMERICAN and WORLD HISTORY. Just spitballin’ though.😒🤬

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

You’re correct, but REID HOFFMAN is funding SMARTMATIC LAWSUITS because he works for known MOSSAD ASSET, MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG. And BLOOMBERG and his MOSSAD BUDDY, ALVIN “BUZZY” KRONGARD, want to avoid accountability for 9/11, CHILD TRAFFICKING and COVID BIOTERRORISM if they can. https://t.co/2fKecVCjYz

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

EXCELLENT call, @DakotaSidwell! Thanks for reminding me of the (illegal) JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY “STUDENT TUITION BRIBERY” move by BLOOMBERG PHILANTHROPIES just 6 DAYS AGO! I can’t wait for that dude’s sentencing to be carried out and for earth to finally be rid of that demon. https://t.co/vWw4ChvkMq

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

*MICHAEL BLOOMBERG: Quite possibly the WORST MOVE you could make at the WORST TIME. You don’t SERIOUSLY think the receipts on YOU, KRONGARD, RUBENSTEIN, GOTTLIEB, MCKLAM, HAINES, SPEYER, ROSENFELD, APOLLO, RAND, NYPH, UJA... haven’t been turned over to authorities already, right? https://t.co/1U63Mr23hO

FFT1776
Posted - October 11, 2024 at 2:16 PM
Saved - October 12, 2024 at 5:30 AM

@FFT1776 - Sheri™

Appellate court grilling Letitia James. Can Letitia be criminally charged? https://t.co/ORLvVzNMSY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Judith Foehl, representing the New York Attorney General's Office, argues the defendants repeatedly violated the law. Defense questions if there's precedent for the Attorney General suing under Executive Law 6312 to overturn a private business deal between sophisticated partners. They highlight the alleged victim's ability and obligation to conduct due diligence, written disclaimers advising independent due diligence, and the subjective nature of property valuations. The defense also notes the alleged victim never complained about fraud or transactional losses. They claim cited cases always involve consumer protection or market protection. The defense adds there was little to no impact on the public marketplace.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: May it please the court, Judith Foehl for the New York Attorney General's Office. All of the defendants repeatedly violated Judith Foehl, Speaker 1: can you identify any previous case which the attorney general sued under Executive Law 6312 to upset a private business transaction that was between equally sophisticated partners where the supposed victim had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence where the supposed wrongdoer advised the supposed victim through written disclaimers to conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions where the alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations of properties and businesses and where the victim never complained about any fraud in the transactional losses from it because I've gone through the cases which you've cited, and all of them always involve the consumer protection aspect. It involved protection of the market. Speaker 0: Several responses. And I want Speaker 1: to add to his question and little to no impact on the public marketplace. Speaker 0: Well, maybe I'll take that first
MilaLovesJoe
Posted - October 11, 2024 at 11:28 PM
Saved - October 12, 2024 at 3:57 AM

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

BREAKING: NY States Appeals Court, appellate court, overturned Leticia James $450 million fraud case agains Donald J Trump. Leaving the AG Defense team begging in their closing statements NOT to be sanctioned https://t.co/BW5TtvYoAb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump supposedly got back $450,000,000 due to an appeals court decision regarding 34 counts brought by Letitia James. The speaker claims the judge stated there were no victims or evidence, and that two businesses had no issues with their dealings. The bank was paid back, and Trump paid back his loan with interest. The speaker alleges the judge viewed the case as an attack on a presidential candidate and possible election interference. They believe the state's lawyers were begging the appellate court not to sanction them. The speaker thinks Letitia James should be tried, found guilty, and imprisoned for election interference.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dang. Y'all are real quiet today on the left, aren't you? Y'all must have seen what the appellate court did. We all saw it. Right? Oh, that's right. They're not reporting it on the mainstream media. See, Donald Trump just got back $450,000,000 that he spent on this appeals court. 34 counts. 34 counts is what corrupt politician Letitia James decided she was gonna try to charge Trump with. And I knew he was gonna win his money back. The judge said there are no victims in this case. There is no evidence in this case. It was 2 smart business entities doing business together. The bank said, we don't have a problem. We were paid back. Trump said, we don't have a problem. We paid our loan back with interest. So what's the problem here? And the judge clearly said that it was a clear attack on a presidential candidate and can be misinterpreted for or interpreted as election interference. But he's a felon. He's a rapist. He's racist. Oh my God. Wake up people. Political prosecution is real in this country. And the best part, the best part is that the state's lawyers closing arguments were basically begging, begging the appellate court judges not to sanction them. Not only do I think they should all be sanctioned, I think Letitia James needs to be tried. I think she needs to be found guilty because she is clearly, and I think she needs to be put in prison for election interference. Tell me what you think in the comments. And all you liberals, where are you at? Have you woken up yet?
RyLiberty
Posted - November 24, 2024 at 1:58 AM
Saved - November 25, 2024 at 1:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Some people wonder how I obtained the Epstein list. It's not a simple document; I compiled it through years of diligent research, gathering information from victims, internal emails, court documents, and testimonies from staff. I didn't just rely on blackbooks or flight logs. Despite being canceled for my views, I stand by my findings. Contrary to popular belief, some individuals on the list have faced prosecution, though the media often ignores these cases. For instance, Jean Luc Brunel was arrested and died in prison, and various perpetrators have settled behind closed doors.

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

Some people ask me how I got the Epstein list. People are naive thinking there is a list sitting in a locker somewhere Like some 1960s Batman villian wrote it all down and saved it. That doesn't exist. I complied the list the way any real journalist should. * It's from the victims owm mouths. * It's from internal emails between epstein and his clients boasting about what they did. * It's from the court documents and quiet settlements with hush money delivered by his lawyer Daren Indyke. * It's from massive payments to Epstein run LLCs by these same people and normally through a Les Wexner front. * And it's from testimony of his staff, body guards, chefs, drivers, pilots, desk girls etc. * It's from the positions he was given as a trustee, consultant, board member for organizations where he didn't do any actual work. You can complie and comb through these and corroborate the evidence. I did the real work for years. I didn't just scoop names of of their blackbook or flight logs. I didn't just watch videos on YouTube. And it didn't matter. I have the list. Whenever new documents were dropped all the names in them were already on my map and list that I publically released years ago. I don't have enough reach to get the media attention on this that it needs because I was canceled on everything for opposing Israel. I just got X back in 2023. So no one gave me the list. I didn't find it. I made it by listing all the perpetrators that we know from multiple sources. If I was wrong I'd be sued into oblivion. I'm not wrong. But what good is it? People don't want to know the truth. It's like the airplane deniers of 911. The entertainment of the fantasy and mystery is more important to them. I need someone with real reach to sit down and talk to me.

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

Gaetz was right https://t.co/2KzYyGLdVc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Barr should testify about Epstein's death, as the official story seems implausible. There's a belief that a foreign government orchestrated Epstein's removal, using him to compromise powerful Americans for leverage. The client list isn't just about powerful individuals; it's about the extortion and tasks they were compelled to perform for Epstein's handlers. This could implicate high-ranking officials and expose significant financial interests, which is why the information remains hidden. As a storm approaches Florida, resources are available for those in need, and the community is prepared to help. The importance of accurate information during crises is emphasized, along with a nod to the region's military presence and natural beauty. Future discussions may include UFOs and military topics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like, you got a 90 you got a you got a 99% On Epstein, Bill Barr is Speaker 1: the one that needs to be called in to give to give sworn testimony on what happened there at at at bureau of prisons because that is that is not that there's just no way that the story you're getting is the real story there. No freaking way, and Bill Barr knows it. Speaker 0: I think most I think most people I think most people believe that. Right? Like, it's got, like, no way that no way that that's Speaker 1: I actually think it was a I actually think that on Epstein, it it was a foreign government that took him out. I don't think it was a domestic enterprise. Speaker 0: Really? Speaker 1: I do. I'm not gonna say which one, but I don't think it was it was domestic inspired to take out him. I think that was a foreign operation. No. What do I tell you? Dude, who do you think what what do you think Epstein is? Okay. You can tell him. Of of course. We're probably Speaker 0: a foreign nation Right. A lot. Maybe Right. Speaker 1: But let's not let's not name it. Let's not let's not smear any nations. But Epstein is working for a foreign government, and his job is to bait these powerful Americans into these compromising circumstances as a method of compromise. Like, this is not a, really novel theory of espionage. It goes on all the time. And so he's creating the honeypot. He's getting them stuck in the honeypot, and he has all that. So if you start releasing the client list, don't think about it in terms of how powerful they are. Think about how in terms of and how powerful the comp is. Because once you know the clients, then you're gonna know the deliverables. But do you think they just got that information on people and then just kept it and said, don't be naughty? No. Those people that had taskings that they had to do for Epstein's bosses. And so it's everyone thinks that the client list isn't out because the people on the list are so powerful, and there may be a a feature of that. But it's actually it's actually what was being delivered back as a as a function of the extortion that I think is is what a lot of powerful people in our government don't want exposed. Speaker 0: Because they would be a part of this operation, because it would, like, implicate the American government in part of the scheme. Speaker 1: Let me just alright. Let let let's let's break it down this way. Let's say, you know, country x. Yeah. And and I actually think there are probably multiple countries involved in running Epstein, but country x is running Epstein. Epstein gets powerful person in to, compromising situation. And then country x, like, really needs to sell a widget Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: To the United States. Right? Now all of a sudden, they can put pressure on that powerful official to get that widget purchased. Sure. Now assume that widget doesn't work, and and and we have it. It was just it was just a way to facilitate the money laundering and the payoff. Well, now you gotta be able to explain that. And let's let's assume, like, some very powerful company makes that widget. It makes 1,000,000,000 of dollars on that widget. Now you're you're doing more than, like, impacting Bill Clinton's, you know, reputation. You're impacting a multibillion dollar revenue stream, and people get killed for that stuff. Speaker 0: Right. And and he did get killed for it, but beef but before he got killed, he was, like, let out of prison for those exact same crimes for, like, the underage crimes. You're in Florida. Speaker 1: Why do you think that was? Speaker 0: Costa says under testimony, I think I think he might have been on the committee. He's like, he belongs to Intel. AltaCosta said it. He belongs to Intel. Speaker 1: Yeah. When when when you're the, like What does Speaker 0: that mean? Belongs to Intel. Right? Speaker 1: That means somebody shows up at your office when you're the prosecutor, and they say, this person has to be put back into the information stream, and they need to be out of this out of this problem so that they can be leveraged and utilized. Speaker 0: The American government flexed his muscles to protect the terrorists. Speaker 1: I I I I I I don't I don't even think this is the only example. Yeah. Speaker 0: Wow. So there so so that's so that's why we may never know unless somebody has, like, the full throated capacity to to go in and muscularly declass declastmile. Speaker 1: And put at jeopardy revenue streams that make people very rich and very powerful potentially to this day. Speaker 0: Yeah. Obviously. You're right. Is this the same Diddy? Is this a Diddy thing? No. Is this similar? Speaker 1: I have no idea. Yeah. Speaker 0: The the operation seems similar. Right? The video cameras, the politicians, the people at parties. Seems it seems, like, on on paper, it seems like a similar Speaker 1: I I I guess the reason with Epstein that it that The Speaker 0: same prison Speaker 1: cell that they have that it Speaker 0: looks like. Speaker 1: But with Epstein believing that this this guy's got, like, a backstory that you wouldn't even believe if he was a character on Lost. Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay? Speaker 1: You know, whereas the Diddy thing is, you know, maybe a little more you can associate it with at the time what kind of the worst parts of hip hop culture, in in in that era. But, like, with Epstein, it's just so obviously an intel op. Maybe you'll see the same in in Diddy's case. I don't know. I haven't seen that evidence. Speaker 0: Fed were excited. Really excited to raid. Grabbed my video tapes like that. Alright. And he even makes you wanna use scratch head scratcher. So biologics on UFOs. Speaker 1: Okay. What task how long have we Jesus. It's a it it how long have we been doing this? Speaker 0: I mean, I my my producers keep telling me we have to wrap, but I Speaker 1: I'm not you know what? UFOs, we're gonna Speaker 0: have to save for Speaker 1: next time. I I just told you, though, it should be at the top of the list on declassification. Okay. Yeah. That'll be my cliffhanger. Speaker 0: Alright. Alright. Fine. Final message to people. The hurricane is supposed to hit in the next 24 hours. Final message out here. We're on the panhandle right now, so this is not gonna be an impact area. That's why my brought my family up here. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Benny's doing like a regular Clyde w Griswold. He loaded up the whole fam, got in the car, went on the long road trip. Christmas tree on top. And so when I came in, here to see him, his daughters so they're, you know, watching television, and one of his cute daughters turns to him and says, I'd like a book. So if you're wondering whether or not Benny Johnson is raising up a a trad little batch of family members, they they are tired of the streaming. They are tired of the Disney. They want books in this and they and the Johnson household. Oh, look. I wanna end the same way I started. We've got the Pensacola Bay Center open. If if you do not have the resources for hotels or or rentals, that should not be the reason you have to put your life in jeopardy in a low lying area in on the Florida Gulf Coast. And so, yeah, as we say in the south, y'all come. We're ready for you at the Pensacola Bay Center. Got plenty of assets, plenty of resources, and it it it won't be, an experience that that you'll regret certainly compared to, you know, the this storm surge is gonna be very serious. And just with the way Florida is shaped, you push that much water kind of into the Tampa Bay area where you've already had a lot of saturation, you're there's gonna be very serious flooding. And so don't wait too long. We'll help you out here in in Pensacola and, make sure that that you're cared for properly. Speaker 0: Don't listen to Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris says do not come. Speaker 1: You can't. Yeah. Yeah. No. You we, we will not be unburdened by what has been. We'll have to rebuild in in a lot of places, but we'll be ready for it. Speaker 0: We'll be ready for it. I'm I have a lot of confidence in the state. We're proud of, the governor. I think he's, like, crushing it right now and a lot of, like, the state reps. Some of the best members of congress may come from the state. You're so included with, like, big audiences to warn people and, like, give out good information. I think, that's really unsung virtue of having a huge big audience if you can inform people accurately in time to time. Speaker 1: Yeah. Luna's doing rep Luna's doing a great job for I can say. That's the sound of freedom. We got a lot of we got if you ever come to Northwest Florida, the 2 things you will not miss are our bases and our beaches. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's right. Speaker 1: Bases and beaches. That's an f 35 right there. Perfect. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's Stop. Yes. It's one of the 30% of them that can fly. Speaker 0: Something else maybe something else you could be class violent. What the hell is it? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That well, you know what? I'll come back. We'll do the Benny show on, the f 35 and UFOs. Okay. Right. That'd be our next Yeah. Speaker 0: I'm just gonna switch. Yeah. That's right. Yeah. Congressman, thank you. Good to see you, man. Speaker 1: I gotta roll.

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

Also people think no one on the list has been prosecuted. That is NOT TRUE. It's simply not blasted all over television. Maxwell's trial should have been bigger than OJ Simpson but it wasn't because it would be so damaging to Israel. Quick Example, Jean Luc Brunel the # 3 in the operation was arrested and died in a Paris prison cell. Allegedly suicide. He ran several modeling agencies the most recent of which is out of Kiev Ukraine and he used these front for false hires to lure in vulnerable girls some of which he supplied to Epstein. He also drugged and raped women himself.

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

Many of the perpetrators have been jailed or had to pay large settlements behind closed doors. The press is simply ignoring it. The law suit from the Virgin Islands forced banks involved in enabling Epstein hush money payments to pay out tens of million of dollars. Hedge funds and asset managements have done the same. Quick Example Apollo Global (Leon Black) had to pay 62.5 Million

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

https://t.co/hnZlRgETTb

DefiantLs
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Saved - November 2, 2025 at 10:12 AM

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

I see why they filed for bankruptcy... https://t.co/KYf1u5vqve

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 launches a heated confrontation, telling Speaker 1 to “go suck another dirty dick” and insisting, “I’m not the one or the two.” They call Speaker 1 a “raggedy ass fucking bitch” and declare, “I’m not the one or the two.” Speaker 1 asks, “What you talking about?” and appears confused or surprised, while Speaker 0 repeats the insult, telling Speaker 1 to “Go suck a dick.” Speaker 0 asserts, “I said what I said, and I said what I said,” and adds, “Please text me like you want it.” They emphasize the challenge to Speaker 1, saying, “You tried me two times,” and conclude with, “I want you to do it a third.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go suck another dirty dick. Don't play with me. I'm not play with you. Do not play with me because I'm not the one or the two. One or the You're not the one or the two. Speaker 1: You know what, honey? Speaker 0: Let's go. You ain't got sister. No. Ain't gonna do nothing. Name. I You and your raggedy ass fucking bitch. Speaker 1: What you talking Speaker 0: about? Fuck out of here. Go suck a Speaker 1: dick. Like Speaker 0: I said, I said what I said, and I said what I said. Please text me like you want it. Go suck another dirty dick. I'm not the one of the two, bitch. You tried me two times. I want you to do it a third.
charliekirk11
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 3:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Supreme Court has ordered President Trump to unfreeze $1.9 billion in foreign USAID payments, which I find unbelievable. Justice Samuel Alito strongly criticized the majority decision, joined by Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh in dissent. He questioned whether a single district-court judge, who may not have jurisdiction, should have the power to compel the government to pay out such a significant amount of taxpayer dollars, expressing his astonishment at the majority's stance.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump must unfreeze $1.9 billion in foreign USAID payments. Unbelievable. Justice Samuel Alito BLASTS the majority with Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh joining in dissent: "Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic “No,” but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned."

MarioNawfal
Posted - April 16, 2025 at 12:09 AM
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 1:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Federal Housing Director William Pulte has referred New York Attorney General Letitia James to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation regarding alleged mortgage fraud. The referral claims that James falsified documents to obtain favorable loan terms, misrepresenting a Virginia property as her principal residence while serving as an elected official in New York. This situation is particularly striking given her history of investigating the financial dealings of others.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸 LETITIA JAMES' MORTGAGE NIGHTMARE: FEDS REFER NY'S TOP PROSECUTOR TO DOJ Federal Housing Director William Pulte formally refers NY Attorney General Letitia James to Justice Department for criminal investigation over alleged mortgage fraud. FHFA letter claims James falsified documents to secure favorable loan terms while representing Virginia property as her "principal residence" despite serving as NY elected official. The prosecutor who's made a career of investigating others' financial dealings now faces scrutiny of her own mortgage applications. Source: @alx @nicksortor

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump Justice Department has accused New York Attorney General Leticia James of mortgage fraud. The Federal Housing Finance Agency alleges James falsified records to meet lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms, citing a Virginia property claimed as her principal residence and a New York property misrepresented as a four-unit structure instead of five. According to Jonathan Turley, the irony is that James prosecuted Trump for making false statements to financial institutions. He says falsely claiming a property as a principal residence to obtain loans is a well-trodden area for the Justice Department. The claim is that James stated her father was her husband on some forms. The DOJ has no comment on the referral, and Attorney General James has not responded. According to the speaker, James stated that the Virginia property was her principal residence, knowing it was not. The New York property had five units, violating the loan agreement, which required four. Turley notes that James stressed Trump was responsible for documents filed in his name, dismissing the argument that his people put them together.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And now the Trump justice department may be a pain in her you know what. The angle has obtained shocking allegations leveled by the Trump administration against New York attorney general Leticia James. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has DOJ accusing James of mortgage fraud. In a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi, director Bill Pulte says James appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms. He cited a property in Virginia that she's allegedly claimed as her principal residence and a property in New York that she claimed as a four unit structure instead of the required instead of a five, which Pulte says means she was able to get a different type and more favorable loan. Joining me now is Jonathan Turley, Fox News contributor and law professor at GW University. Jonathan, mortgage fraud is rampant in The United States. There's all sorts of fraud that's rampant. There's disability fraud that they've vowed to crack down on in Trump administration. But this is another thing that they have vowed to crack down on because it costs real money. Your reaction to these allegations. Speaker 1: Well, obviously, the irony is perfectly crushing. This is a person who prosecuted Trump for everything short of ripping a label off a mattress. And among the charges that were brought in New York in not just a civil, but the criminal case was making false or misleading statements to financial institutions. And one of these sections, section ten fourteen of of the federal code is prosecuted. It took me about sixty seconds of a search to find cases that the Department of Justice brought against people who falsely claimed that property was their principal residence in order to get loans. So this is well tread areas for the the Justice Department. As for James, if if we applied Leticia James standard that she created, there'd be little question here. This seems pretty straightforward. What what the administration is saying is this was not her principal residence. In fact, as a New York elected official, she had to say that her principal residence was in New York. This was an out of state residence. But, also, they claimed that in some of these forms, she actually states that her father is her husband in order to file as a married couple. So there's a lot of those questions. And as you know, the supreme court just stated earlier in March in a case called Thompson that they wanna see knowing false statements under sections like ten fourteen, not just misleading statements. These are misleading statements. Either it's your principal residence or it's not. It's not. Either you're married to your father or he's your father. So I they we can get can satisfy the Thompson standard. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, Jonathan, we reached out to the DOJ and they have no comment on this referral. We also reached out to Attorney General James who did not respond to us either. So again, everyone wants the best interest rate you can get, I understand that, but you know she's a lawyer. She knows that when you sign a mortgage application that mortgage application if you're borrowing money. If you're not borrowing money nobody cares whether it's your principal residence except you know where you file your taxes, but she decided to state that that was her principal residence knowing it was not her principal residence. I didn't even know she had property. I mean I guess she had property in Virginia and she has rental or investment property in New York that's fine. But in the New York matter to get the favorable rate, the building could only have four units, but for it looks like its entirety, the entirety of this building, it had five units. Meaning it was in violation of the actual loan agreement and again this is not a novel application of the law Jonathan as you stated during the persecution of Donald Trump. She was using all novel applications of law to go after him. This isn't novel. This is a black and white issue. You either did or you didn't. Speaker 1: Right. And this has been prosecuted in the past. Now we have not heard her side of this, but these documents themselves are quite damning. It's hard to see how the residences listed were her principal residents. The business about her father is just bizarre. Now I'll note that one of the things that Letitia James stressed in her case against Trump is that Trump had to review documents that were filed in his name. And so she dismissed the argument that, this was something that Trump's people put together. She said he's ultimately responsible. So they alleged that she gave a power of attorney in a in a couple of these instances, but according to her own standard, that's not enough.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸TRUMP ARRIVES IN NYC FOR HEARING Trump threatens to take Leticia James to the Supreme Court if she tries to steal "his babies" - referring to his properties she is threatening to seize if he is unable to make his $454M bond today. Source: Fox

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump faces a deadline to post a $454 million bond in the New York Attorney General Leticia James case. Trump claims he did nothing wrong and questions why he should have to sell his properties due to a ruling from a corrupt New York judge and attorney general. He says these are rigged cases coordinated by the White House and DOJ for election interference and that he will take the fight to the Supreme Court if necessary. Trump says he can technically afford the bond with nearly $500 million in cash, but doesn't want to give his money to a rogue judge. Options include appealing the decision, selling properties or Truth Social shares (though there's a freeze on those shares), or seeking help from investors. James has threatened to freeze his bank and brokerage accounts, collect rent, and seize his New York properties, including Trump Tower and Trump National Golf Club. Trump believes the hush money case should be dismissed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there. The clock is ticking as the deadline approaches for him to post that $454,000,000 bond in New York attorney general Leticia James's case. So Trump posting on his truth social that he, quote, did nothing wrong in questioning why he should, quote, have to sell my babies, referring to his properties and businesses, because of a ruling from a, quote, corrupt New York judge and attorney general. Trump saying, quote, these are rigged cases all coordinated by the White House and DOJ for purposes of election interference. And Trump told me in an exclusive interview last week that he will take this fight against Leticia James all the way up to the United States Supreme Court if that's necessary. He told me quote they can't take away your property before you've had a chance to appeal. Trump also told me he can technically afford bond in this case saying he has nearly $500,000,000 in cash, but Trump told me quote, that doesn't mean I'm going to give my money to a rogue and incompetent judge, the puppet of a corrupt attorney general who is failing with violent crime and migrant crime and whose only purpose in life is attempting to get Trump. So here, Trump does have several options. Trump's legal team is appealing the decision to a higher court. Other possible options involve selling his properties or shares of his truth social app, which could be worth approximately $4,000,000,000 But there is a current freeze on those shares. The board of the company can now vote to waive that freeze following a merger vote to bring the company public on Friday. He can also ask for help from investors, but Leticia James has now threatened to freeze his bank and brokerage accounts, collect rent from his tenants, and initiate proceedings to seize his New York properties. Some of those properties at stake include the famous Manhattan Trump Tower and Trump National Golf Club in Westchester. But as for the brag hush money case today, Trump said he thinks the case should be dismissed. So in a lot of ways, Leticia James has the next move, and we'll see what she does. Absolutely. 11:59 tonight. Okay. Got it. Thanks. We're seeing

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇸TRUMP HOURS AWAY FROM LOSING PROPERTY He faces a deadline to either pay a $454 million fine or have his property seized after failing to secure a bond. This morning, Trump said the judge in the case was “fraudulent” and that the fine “should be ZERO, I DID NOTHING WRONG!”

FlyingSilverCat
Posted - April 16, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 12:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed some discrepancies in their financial situation. They have a new house, a car, and a bond, but the numbers don’t add up. Even with the bond money coming back, they’ll face lawyer fees and likely spent more on the house. It seems like they’re in a tough financial spot.

@FlyingSilverCat - CreativeBar

Wait a second, the numbers don’t add up: - new house (let’s say $200k) - car ($150k) - bond ($250) + donation $500k Current total -$100k, I know they are getting the bond money back, but they still have to pay the lawyer, who I know is going to milk them, PLUS I’m assuming only $200k for the house, which I know they spent way more 🧐 I’m sure these idiots just dug themselves into a financial hell hole 🤣🤣🤣

amuse
Posted - April 16, 2025 at 4:52 PM
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 11:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find the irony in General Letitia James' situation quite striking. While she prosecuted Trump for allegedly defrauding lenders, she herself is now facing serious charges for defrauding her own lenders. It feels like poetic justice, and it's clear she's very worried about the outcome.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The irony is delicious. General Letitia James prosecuted Trump allegedly defrauding his lenders, but it turns out she was defrauding her lenders during the prosecution. She's facing 30 years in prison and million dollar fine. Poetic justice...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights the irony of Leticia James, who prosecuted Trump for financial misstatements, now facing similar allegations. The Department of Justice has prosecuted individuals for falsely claiming a property as their principal residence to obtain loans. Applying James's own standards, the speaker suggests potential issues with her claims regarding her principal residence and marital status on loan forms. The speaker also mentions the Supreme Court's ruling in Thompson, requiring knowing false statements, not just misleading ones, for prosecution under sections like ten fourteen. The Trump administration has made shocking allegations against Leticia James, with the Federal Housing Finance Agency sending a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing her of mortgage fraud. Director Bill Pulte alleges James falsified records to meet lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms, citing a Virginia property claimed as her principal residence and a New York property misclassified to obtain a different type of loan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, the irony is perfectly crushing. This is a person who prosecuted Trump for everything short of ripping a label off a mattress. And among the charges that were brought in New York in not just the civil, but the criminal case was making false or misleading statements to financial institutions. And one of these sections, section ten fourteen of of the federal code, is prosecuted. It took me about sixty seconds of a search to find cases that the Department of Justice brought against people who falsely claimed that property was their principal residence in order to get loans. So this is well tread areas for the the justice department. As for James, if if we applied Leticia James standard that she created, there'd be little question here. This seems pretty straightforward. What what the what the administration is saying is this was not her principal residence. In fact, as a New York elected official, she had to say that her principal residence was in New York. This was an out of state residence. But also, they claimed that in some of these forms, she actually states that her father is her husband in order to file as a married couple. So there's a lot of those questions. And as you know, the supreme court just stated earlier in March in a case called Thompson that they wanna see knowing false statements under sections like ten fourteen, not just misleading statements. These are misleading statements. Either it's your principal residence or it's not. It's not. Either you're married to your father or he's your father. So I they we can get a this can satisfy the Thompson standard. Speaker 1: Representing our respective states, stand up and enforce the rule of law. The president of These United States is not above the law. No matter how rich, powerful, or politically connected you are, everyone must play by the same rules. Please sue him for us. Oh, we're gonna definitely sue. We're gonna be a real pain in the ass. Speaker 2: And now the Trump justice department may be a pain in her you know what. The angle has obtained shocking allegations leveled by the Trump administration against New York attorney general Leticia James. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has sent a criminal referral to the DOJ accusing James of mortgage fraud. In a letter to attorney general Pam Bondi, director Bill Pulte says James appears to have falsified records in order to meet certain lending requirements and receive favorable loan terms. He cited a property in Virginia that she's allegedly claimed as her principal residence and a property in New York that she claimed as a four unit structure instead of the required, instead of a five, which Pulte says means she was able to get a different type.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: General James is very worried. https://t.co/ym59IRqf0O

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are focused, prepared, and trained by the best, referencing their education at Howard University where Thurgood Marshall once taught. They directly address Donald Trump, stating, "We're coming for you." The speaker emphasizes standing up and fighting on, declaring that victory is clear and now. They express impatience, stating they are waiting two years for Hakim Jeffries to bring rest. The speaker concludes by urging action, stating that women have saved democracy before and must do so again.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My mission is clear. I'm focused. I'm prepared. I'm ready. I've been trained by the best. I went to Howard University that overturned legal segregation in this country. I've been taught in those classrooms with Thurgood Marshall once taught. I'm not afraid of no president. Donald Trump, we're ready for you. We're coming for you. We're standing up for you. We're fighting on. We're not going down silent. Victory, my friends, is clear. It's now. And I'm not waiting four years. I'm waiting two until a speaker by the name of Hakim Jeffries comes to bring us some rest. Come on, ladies. It's up to us. We saved this democracy before. We'll save it now. Let's go.
GuntherEagleman
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:18 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

Letitia James denies the mortgage fraud allegations. Karma! The perp walk will be beautiful! https://t.co/Bok3JPHGKg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that allegations against her are baseless and a "revenge tour" following a $454 million judgment against Donald Trump for exaggerating asset values. She claims Trump is targeting law firms, universities, immigrants, and women, causing government chaos. She asserts her office is fighting executive orders and defending New Yorkers' and Americans' rights, and declares she "will not be silenced." When asked about allegations regarding her Brooklyn home being a legal five-family residence with a mortgage for a four-family, she declines to litigate on camera, promising a response at the appropriate time. She believes the aim is to create a headline about a criminal investigation against her and describes harassment by right-wing individuals at her home and relatives' homes as retaliation for actions against Trump.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good to see you, miss James. Thanks for joining us. Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Harold. Speaker 0: Absolutely. What is going on here? Did anybody contact you before this letter went out accusing you of this, that, and the other and making a criminal referral about real estate transactions? Speaker 1: No. Not at all. And let me just say to all New Yorkers and to all Americans, the allegations are baseless. The allegations are nothing more than a revenge tour. And as you mentioned, my office was successful in securing a $454,000,000 judgment against Donald Trump and others for exaggerating the value of his assets. He engaged in a patent and practice of fraud. And the interest is accruing each and every day while the case is on appeal in the first department. It's important that individuals know that this is nothing more than the continuation of the tour. He went after law firms, universities, immigrants, women. Thousands of federal employees right now are unemployed. Our government is in chaos and in disarray. Medicaid, Social Security, CFPB, and the list goes on and on and on. And as you know, as you mentioned, each and every day, my office is leading the fight against these executive orders, which have no legal import at all, have no legal significance. And we are standing up for the rights and privileges of New Yorkers and Americans. I will not be silenced. I will not be bullied. I will not bend. I will not break, and I will not bow to anyone. No one is above the law, including the president of These United States. Speaker 0: Okay. The Speaker 1: office of the attorney general will continue to stand up. Speaker 0: Let let me, follow-up of some of what's in this, this letter. It says that it says according to media reports, which for us in the media is kind of a red flag, meaning that it seems to be based on some social media posts that I know were made by partisan political actors. But just let me ask you about some of the specifics in the letter. They're saying that your house in Brooklyn is a legal five family, and the mortgage on it, is for a four family house. Is that true? Speaker 1: So let me just say that, Errol, you know as any good attorney, I will not litigate this case in a camera. It's important that we will respond to these allegations at the appropriate time and in the an appropriate way. But I will not go back and forth with respect to these baseless allegations. I am more focused again on standing up for the freedoms, the liberties, and for the rule of law in the state of New York. Speaker 0: I was under the impression by all of this that what they were really looking for is what they got, which is a headline saying, you know, Tish James is under a criminal investigation. Is that pretty much what's going on here? Speaker 1: Yeah, that's what they got. That's what they got. And it's unfortunate that you have some of these right wing conservative individuals who are camped out in front of my home and in front of the homes of my relatives in Virginia, harassing them each and every day. And it's unfortunate, knocking on the doors of my neighbors and the neighbors of my relatives in the state of Virginia. And it is nothing more than a headline, nothing more than, again, retaliation against all of the actions that I have taken successfully against Donald Trump. Speaker 0: Okay.
Tablesalt13
Posted - August 14, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Saved - August 14, 2025 at 2:16 PM

@Tablesalt13 - Tablesalt 🇨🇦

Listen to his voice when he talks about financially crippling people who are caught hiking with $25,000 fines This is NOT normal. https://t.co/2wxWLmW04j

Video Transcript AI Summary
An announcement on restrictions is issued. The speaker notes that 12 fines have been issued, signaling enforcement actions. They state, 'It it's certainly my hope that every single one of those is fully prosecuted and and collected.' They add, 'It's just it's just too serious of a situation right now.' The statement frames fines as a response to restrictions and signals that enforcement will continue. The remarks emphasize the seriousness of the restrictions and imply accountability for penalties issued. Procedural language suggests standard enforcement procedures and collection efforts. No further information about the restrictions or the fines is provided.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Announcement on on restrictions. 12 fines have been issued. It it's certainly my hope that every single one of those is fully prosecuted and and collected. It's just it's just too serious of a situation right now.
View Full Interactive Feed