reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@OzraeliAvi - Avi Yemini
This video has now been BANNED on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. The WEF wants it scrubbed, and their lackeys are happy to oblige. Thank you @elonmusk for not caving. 7.3M views and counting. The public want answers. MORE: http://WEFreports.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
The interviewer confronts Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, about the vaccines' failure to stop transmission and accuses him of keeping it a secret. They demand an apology and refunds for countries that invested in the ineffective vaccine. The interviewer questions Bourla's wealth and asks about potential criminal charges and investigations. They also mention Pfizer's history of deceptive marketing and express concern about media censorship. The interviewer urges viewers to visit wefreports.com for uncensored coverage and to support their crowdfunded journalism. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of holding pharmaceutical companies accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Borla, can I ask you, when did you know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission? How long did you know that without saying it publicly?
Speaker 1: Thank you very much.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Answer that question. I mean, we we now know that the vaccines didn't stop transmission. But why did you keep it secret? You said it was a 100% effective.
Then 90% then 80% then 70%. But we now know that the vaccines do not trans stop transmission. Why did you keep that secret?
Speaker 1: To have a nice day.
Speaker 0: I won't have a nice day until I know the answer. Why did you keep it a secret that your vaccine did not stop transmission?
Speaker 1: Is it time to apologize to the world, sir? To give refunds back to the countries that poured all their money into your vaccine that doesn't work, your ineffective vaccine?
Speaker 0: Yeah. You have a little bit of a wrecker.
Speaker 1: It's not making Are you not ashamed of what you've done in the last couple years? Do you
Speaker 0: have any apologies to the public, sir?
Speaker 1: Are you proud of it? You've made millions on the backs of people's entire livelihoods. How does that feel to walk the streets of the millionaire on the backs of the regular person at home in Australia, in England, in Canada?
Speaker 0: What do you think about on your yacht, sir? What do you think about on your private jet? Are you worried about product liability? Are you worried about myocarditis?
Speaker 1: What about the sudden deaths? What do
Speaker 0: you have to say about young men dropping dead of heart attacks every day? Why won't you answer these basic questions? No apologies, sir.
Speaker 1: Do you do you think you should be charged criminally for Albert. For some of the You're gonna do this one. We're gonna do that. Criminal behavior you've obviously been a part of?
Speaker 0: How much money have you personally made off the vaccine?
Speaker 1: How many boosters do you think it'll take For you to be happy enough with your earnings. Nothing.
Speaker 0: Who did you meet with here in secret? Will you disclose who you met with? Who did you pay commissions to? In the past, Pfizer Has paid $2,300,000,000 in fines for deceptive marketing. Have you engaged in that same conduct again?
Are you under investigation like you were before for your deceptive marketing, sir?
Speaker 1: If any other product in the world doesn't work as promised, you get a refund. Should you not refund To countries that laid out billions for your ineffective vaccine.
Speaker 0: Are you used to only sympathetic media So you don't know how to answer any questions?
Speaker 1: Is that it? Wait, smart. What does Shame on you, sir.
Speaker 0: Shame on you. That's Albert Bourla, the boss of Pfizer. His people were pushing us around a little bit.
Speaker 1: Right. He's pretty fit. I don't reckon he's had 1 jab.
Speaker 0: I'm huffing and puffing and bent. At least I didn't have any myocarditis.
Speaker 1: I I I I dare say he's shocked that in his safe space at the WEF here in Davos that he was challenged in a way that he's never, to date, been challenged. Well, that's the thing.
Speaker 0: We're not accredited media here. We're on the outside of the perimeter. So he's only used to the softballs from CNN and MSNBC and people like that. I asked him a real question about product liability. No answer.
A real question about Pfizer's past deceptive practices. You know, they paid the largest fine in American history to the Justice Department for deceptive marketing. I don't know if that's underway right now. I don't know if they're being investigated, but I think they should be. When did he know that the vaccine didn't actually stop transmission?
I wanted to find out because surely he knew before we knew. Why didn't he tell us? I don't know. I mean, I'm really proud of that, question. It was like a kind of walking scrum.
Speaker 1: A joint effort there because I know it's very hard when you're working in the moment as a to actually remember all the all the activities that these people that these These people are criminals in my book. You know, the stuff that they've engaged in the last 2 years, they need to be held accountable for and in the moment that you don't usually get this much time. He had a bit of a walk. And to to actually work together and be able to work around those trying to protect him, it was it was it was exactly what I feel we're here for.
Speaker 0: A big gorilla guy was sort of pushing me around a bit, but, you know, I've I've got a low center of gravity myself. I'm worried about one thing though, Abby. Pfizer is connected to big media in an enormous way. I'm worried that they're going to try and block this video. I'm worried they're gonna try and cancel it on YouTube, on Twitter, on Instagram, on Facebook, places like that.
So I wanna look straight at the camera and say, folks, If you cannot find this video out there, go to wefreports.com. That's a special website we've set up For the World Economic Forum, wefreports.com. And if you feel moved by our coverage, please consider chipping in because we're a 100% crowdfunded. Obviously, We get no ad money. We've been completely demonetized.
But if you like that kind of accountability journalism, Abi Yamini from Australia. I'm Ezra Levant from Canada. We got a great team from around the world. Please go to wefreports.com. Last word to you, Avi.
Speaker 1: No matter where they cancel this video, We will update and have a current version there at wefreports.com. And there, you can share all the content from all the guys on the ground here, I'm doing outstanding work. And if you agree that it is as important as it and as outstanding as I think it is, then please chip in a couple of dollars, to help Pay the cost to do this.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, that was a great moment. We'll have plenty more. Congrats, my friend.
Speaker 1: You're welcome.
Speaker 0: Alright. Ezra Levant, Nabi Amini for Rebel
WEF Reports 2024: Mission to Expose the Davos Elites
The fearless Ezra Levant, Australia Bureau Chief Avi Yemini, and a support team are in Davos, Switzerland all week to expose the Global Elites as they orchestrate their agenda for the coming year at the World Economic Forum's 2024 Annual Meeting.
rebelnews.com
@EricSpracklen - Eric Spracklen🇺🇸
This is criminal. We can’t let this video get shadowbanned - repost it, share it, download it, whatever you gotta do! Spread the information.
Video Transcript AI Summary
As a poll challenger at the TCF Center, the speaker witnessed a ballot with straight party votes for both the Democrat and Republican parties. Despite no other marks on the ballot, a poll worker wanted to give it to the Democrats, which is illegal. The speaker challenged this and sought the supervisor's opinion, who also favored the Democrats. The speaker questioned why the ballot couldn't be given to the Republicans instead, leading to the supervisor yelling and instructing the poll worker to push the ballot through. The speaker also observed irregularities, such as ballots arriving at night and inquiring about tabulation numbers. They express concern about the fairness of elections and the need for action to restore trust in the process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was a poll challenger at the TCF Center on Monday, November 2nd, 3rd 4th. On November 4th, early in the morning, I was standing at the adjudication table and a ballot came across the screen. The ballot had a straight party ticket vote for both the Democrat and the Republican. It was a filled in circle, which is an intentional mark. It's not a dash.
It's not a dot. When the ballot came across the screen, there was no other marks, none of the judges, and none of the other ballot proposals had been voted on. The poll worker then said, I think I'm gonna give it to the Democrats. That's absolutely absurd. That is illegal.
The vote should have been tossed out. At that moment, I said absolutely not, I'm gonna challenge this. So I go get her supervisor, and then her supervisor diverts to her and says, well, what do you think? And I'm like, what do you think? It doesn't matter what you think, it's the law.
Our feelings, our emotions, our thoughts are totally irrelevant. You follow the law. And that ballot is to be tossed out. But she wanted to give it to the Democrats. So then I go get the gentleman who is overseeing the entire absentee ballot counting process while Daniel Baxter was gone.
So this gentleman's name, I do not know. I go get him. He's overseeing the entire process while Daniel Baxter is gone. I asked him. He says to the girl, who do you think?
It was disgusting. I was enraged, and I simply asked a question. I said, well, why Why not give it to the Republicans instead of the Democrats? The gentleman began screaming at me, began yelling at me, began telling me that I had no right to talk to her, and he told her to push the ballot through. And prior to that, that same poll worker, a ballot came across the adjudication screen where this voter had voted for Joe Biden and the Green Party presidential candidate as he gave the vote to Joe Biden.
I also saw the ballots show up in the middle of the night. Also, I inquired about the tabulation numbers from the tabulation machine between shift changes. I recognized that information. We saw a lot of irregular things. This is not an anomaly.
Just because all of us have different accounts of what we saw that doesn't make them invalid, and to expect secretary Benson to actually do something about it is foolhardy. To accept to accept Dan and Essel to do anything about it would be foolhardy. So we're appealing to you guys to do something about it because if our elections aren't fair then we have no republic left. It's a banana republic. We have nothing and and we don't trust the election process.
Why do you think a lot of people don't vote? Because they feel it's the big
@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch
Multiple platforms have now censored this video. Watch the whole thing and you’ll know why.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if the speakers support Trump being indicted. Speaker 1 strongly opposes it, calling Trump the greatest of all time and claiming he was set up. Speaker 2 also opposes it, believing Trump can bring positive change. Speaker 3 sees it as political persecution and predicts it will increase Trump's support. When asked if their lives were better under Trump or Biden, Speaker 1 and Speaker 4 both express support for Trump, citing foreign policy, inflation, and border security as reasons. They want to "make America great again."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you support Trump being indicted?
Speaker 1: Definitely not. That man is the goat. He ran the out the country. They're just trying to set him up. For real.
Trump 2024, for sure. Trump 2024.
Speaker 2: No. Fuck no. So, they're doing whatever they can to get rid of him because they know he's powerful, They they know he can actually do good change in this country. My boy, Donnie, is watching. You have more supporters than you ever know, bro.
Speaker 1: Oh, I just seen that shit 2 days ago. Nope. They all tricked y'all dumb to get Trump out the chair, and I look at the on backfire y'all dumb Trump got my back. Trump for life.
Speaker 0: How do you feel about Trump getting indicted?
Speaker 1: They need to free my boy. Out of every other president, they only doing this for him. He been exposed, and they don't like that. 24, my brother. Yeah.
I ain't used to like that. But now, bro, I realized that he meant well for the country, bro. We need that back. Free Trump. Trump 2024.
Speaker 0: What's your thoughts on Trump getting indicted?
Speaker 3: Basically, political persecution once again. They tried with Russia. They tried with January 6th, and this is what, like, the Team, think that they're they're going after Trump. I think this is just gonna completely increase his support.
Speaker 0: Would you say that your life was better off under Trump or Biden?
Speaker 1: I ain't gonna lie. Trump my mother dog. Trump.
Speaker 4: Trump for sure.
Speaker 0: No question. You say Trump why?
Speaker 4: Well, look at where we are, Foreign policy. Look at inflation. Look at border security. It's not even a a topic anymore. It's just he's gotta go.
We need to get America back. Make America great again
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
News Clips That Disappeared From The News Permanently & All Platforms Work Very Hard To Immediately Remove Them My reach is way down again today so please share and bookmark because you may never see these again. This is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT INFO THEY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW 🚨 https://t.co/fFuS3Nz66U
Video Transcript AI Summary
A witness in New Jersey saw three men on top of a van taking pictures with the burning Twin Towers in the background. The men were later arrested and found to be Israeli. Some had connections to Israeli intelligence. The FBI questioned them about their knowledge of the 9/11 attacks but found no evidence of advanced knowledge. However, there were suspicions that they were part of an Israeli operation to monitor radical Islamic charities. The men were eventually deported. Fox News reported that there were other Israelis in the US who may have had knowledge of the attacks but did not share it. The investigation also revealed suspicions of Israeli espionage activities in the US. A book claimed that Israeli agents withheld information that could have saved American lives in the Beirut Marine Barracks bombing. The book was temporarily blocked by Israeli officials.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It began when this woman was watching the twin towers burning from her apartment in New Jersey. She noticed 3 men on top of a van posing for pictures with the towers burning in the background.
Speaker 1: And I could see that they were, like, happy. You know? They they they were they didn't look shocked to me. You know, they didn't look sharp. I thought it was very strange.
Speaker 0: The witness called police who stopped the van hours later and arrested 5 men. All 5, it turns out, were Israeli. They were turned over to the FBI. Sources tell ABC News during a check of national security databases, Some of the men were listed as having had connections with Israeli intelligence. At the FBI, that set off alarm bells.
The FBI needed the answers to 3 important questions. Who were these men? What brought them to that parking lot on the morning of September 11th? And did they have any advanced knowledge of what was going to happen that day? The men said they were just taking pictures at the time.
They said they worked for a company called Urban Moving. The FBI obtained a search warrant for the company's offices.
Speaker 1: 2 SUVs were filled up with Between 9 12 boxes and computers.
Speaker 0: Not long after the arrest, the offices of Urban Moving were simply abandoned. Almost everything was left behind. In jail, the 5 Israelis were repeatedly interrogated and given lie detector tests. Stephen Gordon was their American lawyer.
Speaker 2: They were asked Questions if they had ever been approached by or hired by any non United States intelligence community.
Speaker 0: While there is still some debate among American intelligence officials, many investigators believe some of the men were part of an Israeli operation aimed at monitoring radical Islamic charities that support groups like Hamas. Something lawyers for the 5 men and the Israeli government strongly denied.
Speaker 3: These 5 Israelis were not involved in any intelligence operation in the United States. The story is simply false.
Speaker 0: In the end, the FBI concluded there was no evidence that any of the 5 men had advanced knowledge of the September 11th plot. After 71 days, the 5 Israelis were deported. Leaving some ruffled feathers among both US and Israeli officials.
Speaker 4: And at that point, we were taken for another round of questioning. This time related to her allegedly being members of Mossad. The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event.
Speaker 5: Now Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in Buying in and on the US who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11th. Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron has details in the first of a 4 part
Speaker 6: Since September 11th, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained either under the new Patriot Anti terrorism law or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained according to investigators, who say Some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the nineeleven attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis May have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are quote tie ins, but when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them saying quote, evidence linking these Israelis to 911 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that Has been gathered. It's classified information.
Fox News has learned that 1 group of Israelis spotted in North Carolina recently is suspected of keeping an apartment in to spy on a group of Arabs who the United States is also investigating for links to terrorism. Numerous documents obtained by Fox News indicate that even prior to September 11th, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States. Investigators from numerous Government agencies are part of a working group that's been compiling evidence since the mid nineties. These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country But investigators say quote, may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity. The first part of the investigation focuses on Israelis who say they are art students from the University of Jerusalem and Bezalel Academy.
They repeatedly made contact with US government personnel the report says by saying they wanted to sell cheap art or handiwork. Documents They they quote targeted and penetrated military bases. The DEA, FBI, and dozens of other government facilities, and even offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel. The majority of those questioned quote, stated they Served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept, and or explosive ordinance units. Another part of the investigation has resulted in the detention and arrests of dozens of Israelis at American mall kiosks where they've been selling toys called puzzle car and zoom copter.
Investigators suspect a front. Shortly after the New York Times and Washington Post reported the Israeli detentions last month, the Carts began vanishing. Zoomcopter's web page says we are aware of the situation caused by thousands of mall carts being closed at the last minute. This in no way reflects the quality of the toy or its salability. The problem lies in the operator's business policies.
Why would Israelis Spy in and on the US? A general accounting office investigation referred to Israel as country a and said quote, according to a US intelligence agency, the government of country a conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against the US of any US ally. A defense intelligence report said Israel has a voracious She's appetite for information and quote, the Israelis are motivated by strong survival instincts which dictate every facet of their political and economic policies. It aggressively military and industrial technology and the US is a high priority target. The document concludes quote, Israel possesses the Sources and technical capability to achieve its collection objectives.
A spokesman for the US excuse me, the Israeli embassy here in Washington issued a categorical denial saying any suggestion that Israelis are spying in or on the US is quote simply not true. There are other things to Sit her and in the days ahead, we will take a look at the US phone system and law enforcement's methods for wiretaps and an investigation into the possibility that both have been compromised by our friends and allies overseas. Brett.
Speaker 5: Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge of what was going to happen on nine Levin, how clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something?
Speaker 6: Well, it's very explosive information obviously and there's Great deal of evidence that they say they have collected. None of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. A bigger question they say is how could they not have known? Owned almost a direct quote, Brett.
Speaker 7: Agreed with an Israeli request to stop the distribution of a book that contains some pretty damning information about the Israeli could service the Mossad. If it is true, here's ABC's John Martin.
Speaker 3: The most sensational claim in the book involves This bloody day, the Beirut Marine Barracks Bombing. The book says Israeli agents kept vital information from US Marines That might have saved the lives of 241 Americans killed here. Israeli government sources deny this account. But according to the book, An Israeli informant saw a Mercedes truck being fitted with secret panels for explosives. Israeli troops were told to be on the lookout for the truck, But the book says the Israelis intentionally gave the Americans only a vague warning, not mentioning the kind or size of vehicle.
The book says Israeli intelligence was willing to let the terrorists succeed to protect their sources and out of contempt for US intelligence. It says agents withheld information on US hostages for similar reasons. In Toronto today, the author was under a Court ordered gag not to discuss the book or the case.
Speaker 8: You see, there's 2 restrictions. There's one restriction that I can't talk about what I learned or have Down in the Mossad and the other restrictions, I cannot talk about anything that's in the book.
Speaker 3: Israeli officials confirm that Victor Ostrovsky worked for the Mossad in the 19 eighties. Alarmed by the contents of the book, they got it temporarily blocked in Canada and the United States.
Speaker 8: It's the position
Speaker 9: of the Israeli government That the information contained in the book could very well lead to the identification of employees of the Mossad and could jeopardize their lives.
Speaker 3: But the book's introduction says it does not name active agents and gives only initials. It does say that more than 2 dozen senior Israeli agents routinely gather intelligence in the United States. Late today, the book was put out for sale in New York after the court lifted its restraining order. The publishers claimed victory, but the Israeli embassy said it will still pursue its action against the author.
@Alex_Oloyede2 - Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺
They have forced a couple of accounts to take down this video, let's see how long it stays on my account. https://t.co/uX9t2EhBQQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel is described as a racist country founded on the expulsion and massacre of Arabs. Videos and polls reveal widespread racism and discrimination against Arabs in Israeli society. These views are also reflected in government laws and policies that restrict marriage, deny rights, and promote segregation. Politicians who advocate for the genocide of Palestinians hold high positions in government. Israel portrays itself as a victim, but its actions, such as cutting off essential services to Gaza, suggest a goal of genocide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel is one of the most racist countries in the world. While you'll never hear anyone in the mainstream media say this, this is actually one of the most important things you need to understand if you wanna know what's happening right now. From its inception, now. The whole idea of Israel as a country was based on racism. Israel was conceived as a Jewish state, and while there's nothing wrong in principle with Jews having a homeland, now.
The promise that they insisted that that homeland had to be in Palestine, which already belonged to someone, the Palestinians. The slogan of Israel's founders was now. A land for a people for a people without a land. But deep down, they all knew that the only way to have a Jewish majority in Palestine, an Arab country, was to expel the Arabs. Now.
One of the founders of Israel, Joseph Weitz, wrote, there's no room in the country for both peoples. There's no way but to transfer the Arabs from here to neighboring countries. Israel was quite literally founded by expelling and massacring hundreds of thousands of Arabs in a years long process called the Nakba. And when you now. Found a country based on racial exclusion, you're gonna get a culture that fosters and celebrates racial exclusion because countries that commit terrible atrocities now.
Rarely acknowledge committing those atrocities, and the presence of Palestinians who remained in Palestine became a constant reminder, not only of the violence that now in Israel, but of the constantly looming threat that they might come back and try to reclaim their land. Every day, you can find videos It's coming out of Israel showing Israelis calling for all Arabs to die. Now. Insulting the prophet Mohammed. Now.
Desecrating mosques. Now. Spitting on Christians, mocking and celebrating the murder of Palestinians, committing violent hate crimes against Palestinians, now. Watching Gaza get carpet bombed from a cliffside for entertainment. But don't just go off these anecdotes.
Let's look at some of the polls. 1 poll found now. 2 thirds of Israeli teens believe Arabs to be less intelligent, uncultured, and violent. He'd also found that 50% of Israelis wouldn't live in the same building as Arabs, now. Wouldn't befriend Arabs, wouldn't let their children befriend Arabs, and wouldn't let Arabs into their homes.
Another poll found that 60% of Israeli Jews want segregation now. From Arabs. Another poll found that half of Israeli Jews agree with the statement, most Jews are better than most non Jews because they were born Jews. Now. The poll also found that 88% of Israeli Jews would be disturbed if their son befriended an Arab girl, and 90% would be disturbed if their daughter befriended an now.
This poll found that about half of Israeli high schoolers don't think Arabs should have the right to vote. Another poll showed that almost half of Israeli Jews now. Don't want Arabs teaching their kids. Not only are these views widely held in Israeli society, they're also represented in government, which codifies these sentiments into law. Now.
For example, Israel has a law that says if an Israeli marries a Palestinian or someone from several other regional Arab states, that person isn't allowed to move in with now, said Israeli. This law was passed in 2003, but it's been renewed every single year since. Israel also doesn't allow interreligious marriage to be now. Formed in the country, which is meant to deter Jews from marrying non Jews. In 2018, Israel passed the nation state law, a law which has constitutional status, which says now.
The right to exercise national self determination, I e, have rights, is the exclusive right of Jews, no one else. There's also the Nakba now. The law, which makes it illegal to acknowledge the Nakba, the expulsions of Palestinians that were needed to found Israel. This would be like passing a law to make it now. Illegal to talk about indigenous genocide or slavery in America.
There's also the admissions committee law, which basically allows towns to operate panels that deny Applications for entry based on sociocultural compatibility, which essentially just legalizes racist housing discrimination. In Israel, now. Advocating genocide of Palestinians doesn't hurt your chances of holding a high position in government. And in fact, in many cases, it helps. Now.
In 2014, Israeli lawmaker Ayelet Shaked wrote an unhinged rant on Facebook, calling all Palestinians now. Enemy combatants in saying their mother should be killed for giving birth to, quote, little snakes. The next year, she was appointed a minister of justice by Benjamin Netanyahu. Now. It's Omar Ben Gavir, a lifelong admirer of Merit Kahan in Arab exterminationist, a man who praised the Jewish settler who killed the Palestinian for throwing a rock at now.
A man who was famously acquitted after being criminally charged for chanting death to Arabs is Israel's current minister of national security. Now. He's not some fringe figure either. He's one of the most popular politicians in Israel right now. In the last few days, Israel's been working hard to cast itself as the victim, now.
The victim of hatred, the victim of terrorism, the victim of anti semitism, that they have no choice but to lay siege to Gaza. Now. But underneath this carefully concocted victim complex is a racist, Jewish supremacist state that's been trying to finish the job that the Nakba started for now. Decades. And, really, this shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone.
After all, they're literally cutting off water and electricity to a city of 2,000,000 people now. Their generals talk openly about flattening Gaza and killing the animals, meaning Palestinians. It's obvious their goal is genocide.
@TINFQIL - TINFQIL
This video has been taken down on nearly every platform.... I wonder why? https://t.co/lUgGhUbUJy
@Whiplash437 - Whiplash347
Broadcast: EXPOSED This video has been deleted from every platform (including google) years ago. It took us a long time to find it. MAKE IT GO VIRAL‼️ https://t.co/yNPAhsapyn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the importance of the international order that has been built over generations. They suggest that ordinary individuals lack the capability to govern themselves effectively. They believe that progress and order can only be achieved when people willingly give up their rights to a powerful sovereign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the international order that we have worked for generations to build. Ordinary men and women are too small minded to govern their own affairs. The order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all powerful sovereign, and for the
@MOSSADil - Mossad Commentary
The UK banned this video so let's make sure to spread awareness https://t.co/6ehCDTDxkH
Video Transcript AI Summary
A British NHS doctor and a speaker engage in a heated discussion about categorizing a terror attack. The doctor defends the Palestinians' right to resist an occupation, while the other speaker argues that the attack was terrorism. The doctor mentions Islamic standards in warfare and claims that killing innocent civilians goes against those standards. The conversation becomes tense as they discuss videos showing the perpetrators boasting about their actions. The doctor insists that resistance is a right in Islam and international law, while the other speaker finds it offensive and questions the doctor's credibility as a healthcare professional. The doctor refuses to condemn the attack and blames the powers supporting Israel for the situation. The conversation ends with the other speaker expressing disbelief and questioning the doctor's suitability as an NHS doctor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How can you categorize a terror attack in which 1200 mostly innocent civilian people were brutally attacked, raped, tortured, beheaded, and murdered. How can you, a British NHS doctorate, NHS doctor in Britain. How can you say that's a welcome punch on the nose?
Speaker 1: I will defend the right the Palestinians to to resist an occupation. When you look at that It's not resistance. That's terrorism. When you look at what happened and the 7th October, as if that is the day that everything started
Speaker 0: I didn't say that. Do you think what happened on October 7th was a terrorist attack? It's a resistance.
Speaker 1: Not a terror attack. Put this. If if, and it's
Speaker 0: If NHSTP. If
Speaker 1: I'm asking you to let me finish. If, Right. Our our Islamic standard in conflict, in warfare, our prophet, peace be upon him, he said, you can't kill children. You can't kill women. You can't kill the elderly.
You can't mutilate.
Speaker 0: Hamashallah. If anybody did that, if If? What do you mean if?
Speaker 1: I say if because They
Speaker 0: literally broadcast on their own streaming platforms.
Speaker 1: And, well, I'll tell you what
Speaker 0: a lot of us saw. Amash broadcast it merrily to the world. Here's here's us doing these terrible things.
Speaker 1: And what many of What do
Speaker 0: you mean if? What many of
Speaker 1: us saw on that day were videos coming out showing people saying we will not harm women. We will not harm children.
Speaker 0: Do me a favor.
Speaker 1: No. No. That's what Utter. I'm saying that. I'm saying that.
Resistance is a right in Islam. It's a right in international law. It's even a right that Churchill said in his history of the English speaking peoples that is he actually he actually wrote in that book, it is a primary right of men to kill and die for the land they live in.
Speaker 0: You literally just read me a description of what people who follow Islam are not supposed to do Yeah. And hamasted all of those things. And and But your response is to say, well, hang on. I've seen videos of them saying, we don't wanna do that stuff.
Speaker 1: No. I yes.
Speaker 0: I find that pretty offensive, doctor. I find We all know they did it because they boasted to the world with their own videos what they were doing.
Speaker 1: I find it amazing that respected journalists like yourself
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Seem to have suspended their critical No.
Speaker 0: No. I'm I'm believing what Hamas wanted me to see. Well, You're believing what you saw No. No. What hamash themselves broadcast to the world because they wanted to take great glee in what they've done.
Speaker 1: Let me
Speaker 0: There's no there's no ambiguity about it.
Speaker 1: I asked you to let me finish, and
Speaker 0: I'm gonna You've got to answer questions.
Speaker 1: I will answer the question. Let's agree on a principle. If atrocities were committed, right, I will never condone them. Right? I will say that.
Speaker 0: So do you condemn what happened on October 7th?
Speaker 1: If atrocities are committed, do you know who's Well, do you
Speaker 0: mean if? Who they were? Who's responsible for it then? Ah, so you don't condemn it. Okay.
Who is responsible for it? Well, the Jews brought it on themselves.
Speaker 1: Actually, I would say more more than that. I would say the powers that believe that Israel should be a colony for themselves in the Middle East, They are the ones responsible.
Speaker 0: I'm really struggling. I've gotta be honest with you. I'm really struggling. Do you know that a national a British National Health Service doctor of 25 years, a man who's supposed to be seeing patients all day every day and putting them right, is incapable of saying what happened when it was literally broadcast to the world by a terror group. Nor do you think they're terrorists.
You think it's resistance. You seem to want to go either way to justify it. You don't even believe what they showed us with their with their own technology. And I'm I'm just curious. You you do you think any of this is compatible with you being a doctor in the National Health Service?
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Share this now, before it disappears. Globalists don't want people to know this. https://t.co/ZkaRUw4zMn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States is facing an invasion through illegal immigration, causing cities to collapse. Politicians are accused of betraying their citizens by supporting illegal aliens over Americans. Secret refugee camps for illegal immigrants are found in Chicago, including at an airport terminal and police stations. The impact of this invasion is devastating, leading to the destruction of communities and the country's future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The story of history is the story of invasions. One group of people moving into someone else's land and taking in. 1 nation ends, another begins. Invasions drive history. Few Americans understand this is happening to them right now.
The United States of America is being invaded. For the love of god, this is a damn invasion. Who is allowing this?
Speaker 1: They invaded our privacy. I think it's an invasion of the country.
Speaker 0: Few are even acknowledging it. And the people who lead us are letting it happen. Why are leaders letting this happen? Well, to destroy the country and to change the demographics. Who lives here determines what the country's like?
This country is changing faster than you may understand. Americans are being replaced. That's not a conspiracy theory. It's a fact. In August of 2023, illegal immigration outpaced American birds, a brand new population.
Last year alone, over 3,000,000 people came here illegally just over our southern border. The media won't tell you it's happening, but if you look around, you can see it, and you can see it most clearly in our cities, which are collapsing. We elect people to protect us. That's what politicians are paid to do, but they've done the opposite. They've sold us out, and they've crushed what our ancestors built.
Take a look at our cities. They're hellish, and immigration is the reason. The city of Chicago was in tough shape even before Joe Biden opened the border. Now parts of it are basically uninhabitable. Even the socialist mayor of Chicago says the city is breaking under the strain.
Speaker 1: Without real significant, investment from our federal government, it won't just be the city of Chicago that won't be able to maintain state. The Illinois
Speaker 0: Chicago's politicians may complain about illegal immigration in public, but in private, they're paying for it with your money. They're spending more on illegal aliens than on their own citizens. They're doing this secretly. They're hiding it from the public. Our team uncovered a shadow terminal, for example, inside Chicago O'Hare Airport.
100 of migrants were being hidden there secretly. Our team pulled up with cameras rolling, and at first, we didn't see much. The city erected a black tarp to hide what was going on. The motive was simple. They didn't want us to see it, and a third party security group paid for with your tax dollars told us that was prohibited.
We weren't allowed to see. What about you doing? I wanna look inside.
Speaker 1: My what? My what?
Speaker 0: They weren't local or federal law enforcement, so we ignored them. They had no authority. They were rent to cops. Inside, our team found more than a 100 beds on the floor. The smell was overpowering, repulsive.
It was filthy. But it's not just airport terminals that have been given over to people who've come here illegally from the poorest countries in the world without permission, criminally, and yet being supported in every detail of their lives by taxpayers. No. Even police stations in Chicago have been turned into refugee camps. This is new video never seen before of what's actually happening inside Chicago's police stations.
Keep in mind, the people who work in those police stations are paid to protect you, but that's not what they're doing. They're running refugee camps for illegal aliens. As our cameraman approached the Chicago police precinct in the city's downtown to see what was happening inside, you see people come out illegal aliens shooting in the middle finger and yelling. They didn't hide their hostility. Many other illegals have been pushed into poor, prominently black neighborhoods on the south side.
We went there. We spoke to someone who has lived on the south side of Chicago virtually his entire life. He's enraged by how the city has fallen apart under its sanctuary city policy.
Speaker 1: Andre Smith, CEO of Chicago Against Violence. Violence. I don't know the count, but I know that the readiness, the language of sanctuary city, state, and county should've had a plan, but it led to a massive migrant crisis was the most devastating thing that I ever seen.
Speaker 0: You live in America, the place you grew up, the place you'd like to see your children grow up in much the way that you did. But that won't be possible because of the single greatest sellout in our history. 100 of years of America eliminated by an invasion that our leaders made possible. You should know that.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
THIS IS AN IMPORTANT VIDEO! THEY TRY TO HIDE THIS STUFF FROM THE PEOPLE! https://t.co/Zmc4V5y5Ow
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses various topics related to health and wellness. They mention that all planets make noise and that when a piano was invented, it was tuned to match the Hertz rates of the planets. The speaker also talks about a deworming program they have developed to address health issues caused by parasites. They mention that all diseases are caused by parasites and that food, particularly vegetables, can contain parasite eggs. They also discuss the suppression of information about parasites in human tissue and the importance of colloids for health. The speaker briefly mentions other topics such as age regression, time travel, and a gasoline device that doubles gas mileage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I found out that all the planets that revolve around the sun are making noise. They're singing to each other. They're making noise. And then I found out that, miraculously, when a piano was invented, they didn't even know about some of the planets. But when they tuned that piano, they matched all the Hertz rates and all the notes to all the planets and they got them all right.
And they didn't have to tune a piano that way. Crazy Otto, out of Germany, played beautiful music, and he used an untuned grand piano to play his music. So they didn't have to tune the piano that way, they did. That to me was a miracle. And so, we decided to use the chord of b flat because that's the way the planet wain water.
And we said it to the kids that work in our lab. And, you know, they quit listening to wild music. And now, they're starting to listen to country and western and some classical. Uh-huh. I I believe that what you're doing, you're on the right track, because all our kids are desperately looking for the musical notes that they're missing, and so they're listening to this wild, insane, out of control music.
So we're putting it into the water. So we've put together a program. I've put together a program. I have picked several deworming companies because we found out that other scientists have stated that all cancer is caused by parasites of one sort or another. All disease is caused by the same way.
Now when you eat food, you take on the eggs. You just do. They're in all vegetables. All of them. Through the process of osmosis, when all those parasite eggs are in the soil and you water the garden, the eggs get into the into the plant through the process of osmosis, and you consume them when you eat a salad.
The reason they hatch is because when they make salad dressing, they use propa alcohol, food grade propa alcohol. They wash the huge tank out today, and tomorrow, they make honey mustard. And they don't clean the propa alcohol out of the tank properly. And so they mix the new salad dressing with propa alcohol. That breaks down the shell of the egg and what gets in your gut attaches.
Now, it gets into your bloodstream because it's a really, really small little organism, and it's got a problem. There are these things called t cells, gonna devour them. And this one little bug had a friend, Pete, and he's already in that t cell screaming for his life. I mean, I can imagine the the terror. And for some reason, your as an example, your pancreas houses wood alcohol.
When it houses wood is houses wood alcohol. When it houses wood alcohol to save you from it, that little parasite can feel the vibration and goes there for safety kinds of others get in there and they have a great time. And they drop their feces in there and they kinds of others get in there, and they have a great time, and they drop their feces in there. The feces attracts another virus that lives in it and mold, which grows a little to miniature mushrooms. And as a result, your children are born, or you get later diabetes.
And so we put a program together, and I've got 100 of diabetics that are no longer diabetics. It takes somewhere between 6 weeks 3 months. And up to this point, I've only had 2 failures in 5 years. 2 failures in 5 years, and I'm more still working with both of them. And I tell you, it's a deworming program.
When they get into your thymus, do you know what happens? Your thymus starts to shut down. It it it disturbs the quantity and quality of acid in your stomach. And as a result of that, you come down with Epstein Barr chronic fatigue syndrome or can candida. The mold now grows in your stomach because the acid isn't strong enough kill it.
And so the fruits you eat, here you've got a new pro problem. You're developing warts and all kinds of other things, and it's a mold problem. When you've got flukes in your thymus, you develop chronic fatigue in Epstein Barr. All you need is a deworming program to shut it down. These folks and the folks in the back have a deworming program that we've done tests on.
I do not make money on it. I do not sell it. It's a freedom of speech issue. All I sell are the support things around it. And I tell you folks, we've tried to get the program things that you can do to And you can get your health back.
And there are all kinds of things I've discovered that go with this. There's, eye drops for those people that can't read and need glasses. If you get yourself, a small amount of clarvastan, which is an eye drop, and I think they've got some over there, you wind up rebuilding your eyeballs. I went to a man who needed deworming badly because he had bad breath, and he is an eye specialist. And he just laughed at me until he was doing an exam in the state that I live in on a woman and a worm swam through.
These parasites are do not stay in one spot. They travel all over. They're small. They're microscopic. And you know what?
Just in the tapeworm variety, there are 700 varieties. Just in that one grouping. If you're loaded with parasites, you're gonna go bald because certain parasites get into your scalp. And there, they shut down the the hair follicles with their feces. And folks, when I dewormed, that's how I grew this hair back.
You know how many men have grown their hair back because they dewormed and now they're doing their stuff? You'd just be amazed. The hair just starts to grow back. Epstein bar oh, children's eye infections, a couple drops of that water in the eyes and the pink eye vanishes. You can time it in 6 hours.
You can time it. Chronic ear infections in children. They've had infections in there for a whole year. 8 ounces of that water, a little bit of a deworming program. And within 2 or 3 days, the whole year infection clears up and they do not come back.
I'm telling you, folks, this is big stuff. And now, the FDA is on to us. They now know what the water will do. They now know what all this stuff is due. So they're prescriptionalizing everything.
You will not be able to buy. You will not be able to hear me probably after February 13th or so or March 4th 15th this year, nobody will be able to stand up here and talk like I'm talking right now because the FDA is shutting it all down with a new program they put in motion that is a labeling issue, and they're taking all colloids off the market. So we're dropping it into drinking water standards. That means I can sell drinking water. You'll still be able to buy the product, but I will never again be able to stand up and talk about it.
Communism is here. Amen. We have not done anything about it. And if you want to do something about it, you better start doing something now, because this is a major issue. This means you cannot go to the health food store and read a damn thing about what you're buying.
Nothing. You can't read about it. You can't walk in and buy colloidal silver in a store that's that does wonders for you. And the way they put it down, some 75 year old woman, when she was 13 years old, said she drank some colloidal silver and turned blue. No one in the history of anything has ever turned blue from it.
A few of them, when they were drinking, a poison, which wasn't colloidal silver, it was, silver nitrate, they turned gray. But the point is, is they're not the FDA doesn't care. They've got you where they want you. You're not doing anything, and so they're shutting everything down. I've done the absolute best I can, folks.
And I tell you right now, I can get your health back. So we've got other things to show you in the future. And when I come back, all you'll be able to see is me getting younger and younger and younger. I'm going back to 37. I was gonna go to 28 or 29, but then I met a couple 29 year olds.
So that did that. Actually, I had a lengthy conversation with him. Oh, wow. So 30 7, 38, 39 it is for me. And that's where I'm going back.
And I wanna tell you something, there's things around like this. This is called human growth hormone. And I found out if you put this with colostrum, which we also have, and you hook this up with your deworming program, this is an age regression program, guaranteed. It works. We have some of this from a German man who made this stuff, who owns the largest pharmaceutical company in the world.
He's now 80, and he's dying. So he put the whole pharmaceutical company into work, and he made this stuff. It's not marketed. I'm the only guy with it. It's called human growth hormone boost.
It comes in a little tiny bottle for $28. And, boy, does it work. Now I don't know how long it's gonna be really good. And I don't know how long the people are gonna be able to get it into this country, probably another month or some blessed thing. But it has, I understand, a 9 year shelf life.
And we're getting some of it in. It's not gonna last long. If you want some of it to try it, you can get a little bottle of it for, or give your name and what have you. We can supply if you if you can't get it. I think we got some bottles around here somewhere.
Have you got any over there? Human growth hormone? Quite yet. Not quite yet. Well, I know there's some upstairs.
The point is is just leave your name and your phone number, and he'd be able to get you a little bottle of it for you to try. It'll blow you out of the water. You combine it with some colostrum and combine it with this program, and it will make you younger. It'll get rid of the wrinkles on your face. It'll make you bright and vibrant.
Has anybody seen me the last time I talked? Anybody seen me? How am I looking? Younger. Much younger.
See? I'm telling you, folks. I'm going back to 37, and that's all there's to it. There's some side effects I have to warn you about, you men. You're nice and comfortable with the fact that you don't have to perform all the time?
Well It's back. It's back. And it's not good. I wish it would go away. I really do.
Just just relax. Just relax. When I say so, not when you say so. You know, that's but this doesn't work. And I've forgotten about that.
I really did. I forgot about it. And and we've we've found out that we can do this. We can make you younger, make you vibrant, make you happy, make you healthy. There's all kinds of other little things.
There's a substance, an ancient remedy called Lugol's iodine. Anybody heard of it? You know? Okay. We have some over here.
Here's the issue. If you're not allergic to iodine, if you can eat shellfish, you're okay. And and shrimp or crab or whatever, you're not allergic to to iodine, you can handle this. Six little drops in 8 ounces of water, 3 times a day for 3 days, knocks out candida every time. If you're in bed laying down there with candida, damn it, it's because these critters are growing in your stomach and spreading through your system.
Candida is knocked out with Lugol's iodine in 3 to 4 days. Then you can stop using it for a while. There's all kinds of little little tricks and things. And I'm gonna be over here. I can do a few readings and things.
And, for my, workshop, I gotta find out when it is. I don't even know when it is. I'm going to do this one more time. I'm going to teach people how to go to god's banquet table. Now look, folks.
If you're religious and you're a Christian, it's okay. So am I. But I just do things a little Okay? That's kind of a whining for the Christians. It's alright.
I love you anyway. Just, I've had some trouble with this. The last time I taught everybody how to go to God's banquet table, I learned that from the from the American native heritage that I'm part of, you know. And we've been at it longer than you have, you know. And, give me a break.
Don't get on the radio and rant and rave about me and my water is the devil and all this stuff, please. Don't do that. I don't do that to you. So if you wanna come to the the little meeting with an open mind, and you wanna learn to go to God's banquet table, I'll teach that. It's a step by step program.
And the last time I did, what, 300 people, 2 of you actually wrote back and said you made it. 2 of you. So that means it's worth doing it again because it's one ripping experience, I'm gonna tell you. When you get to go, wow. Especially first time.
And you look down and see the earth way down there, you know that you've kind of stepped out of this place. And it's a real fabulous feeling of of accomplishment. And then, when you discover that, at the banquet table, the stuff comes up to you and performs into reality, and you see you can get schematics, you can get mathematical equations. I've solved problems for scientists that had terrible problems, and I solved them in 2 nights. Took me that long to keep, because I don't I can't remember everything I see.
So I gotta come back, and then I gotta go again and get some more information. But you know, this all the information of the world is there. Every bit of information you need is there. And, get healthy, be happy, and let's, get young. And let's get rid of all our diseases and all our problems, and, get on with this thing.
And the very last thing I have to say is that, Nikola Tesla everybody here heard of Nikola Tesla? I'm sure. Okay? Nikola Tesla built 3 devices that were part of time travel. The first one was the which Likowski sort of perfected.
There is another device that goes with the Likowski multi wave oscillator that was never known. I know what the device is. I built it, and it works. That is out of body when you want to experience to travel. That's what it is.
It is you if you've got a multiwave oscillator, even a homemade one, I can teach you how to make it work. Because you have to build another little device. It's pretty simple. Come to me. I'll I'll tell you what it is.
But a multiwave oscillator is you stepping out of body to travel. Out of body experience at will. This is no accident. The second device was interdimensional. That means you can take the body with you to other planets and other places.
Little risky. Gotta know what you're doing. And the 3rd dimensional travel issue was, time in 3rd dimension, which our government's been playing with for years. And they've done some pretty dastardly things with it. I'm not into that.
But I was told, not too long ago that if I wanted, I could find the equipment. I have found it. It's on its way. I bought it. I own Nikola Tesla's original second device.
That takes us to another planet. So, we're kind of that far. And, I'll be talking about that some more during my workshop. I'll explain it. And maybe I'll have them fax some pictures of it over here, so I can show it to you, let you see what it looks like.
It's quite a massive device. It uses a 1,500,000 volts of power to run. It's a pretty dramatic instrument, And it's all original, and it's in working condition. And I've got it. It's in, it's being shipped.
And it should be at this place I built when I get home. So, I hope I've made some sense here for you. I tell you, there's great hope. There's, lots of stuff you can do for your health. You can get better.
We've got a fabulous deworming program. We've got fantastic water. There's, there's a tape over there that you can get a hold of and watch. And there's people, I believe, on the tape that stand up and tell you what they had and what they did and how they handled it and got rid of it and did all this stuff. Oh, I still got 10 minutes.
Alright. When, when these issues basically started to develop and be crushed was in the twenties. It happened with the, folks that were doing, veterinarian work. They started to look at the tissue of animals, and they found out that the tissue of animals is actually full of parasites. So if you're eating medium rare, medium rare, or raw meat?
You got loads of parasites in you. Loads of them. In the in medium, medium rare and rare meat, we find actual living hatched critters that are running around. They're already hatched. And it's in all meat.
It's in chicken, pork, beef, sheep, goats, the whole 9 yards. The time that it really started to be suppressed when they wanted to use drugs for disease was in the twenties. The veterinarian group found these critters, and they went to the, hospital and asked for some tissue samples of humans, which they were given. And they found all the critters in human tissue. All the critters from those meat varieties were in the tissue.
When they wrote a book about it, the church got involved. And the church stood up and said, Look, we don't care if the critter looks the same as it is in an animal, pees the same, runs the same, breeds the same, wiggles the same. We don't care. Man is not an animal. He is a godly being, and so those parasites are not animal parasites.
They're human parasites, and they have to be dealt differently. We're not hooking man up with any animal with a parasite problem. And lots of, stuff came out in the twenties thirties that we picked up on that issue. All those books were suppressed, and now you can't find them. I'm finding them in old doctors' libraries.
Doctors that are retired have those books. I got 4 of them. There's 7 of them. There's 2 I don't have. I'm still looking.
You don't wanna see these books. I can't look at some of the stuff because they drew them in actual size in color. They drew them in color. One page is the critter. The next page is the prescription or the or the herbs or the drug that would kill those critters.
And all of that work was done. It was done in the twenties, and then it was suppressed. It was kept even from the young men that are becoming I think, trip of becoming a doctor, and that's that. So, they don't they don't even think it happens. And and, you know, they don't think they have a nutrient problem.
We've got colloidal this, colloidal that, colloidal minerals. We got all kinds of stuff for you to get you better. Doctors don't think that they have a problem, and that's why they die at what? 58? That's their lifespan.
While dead doctors don't lie, you know, they're dead. And, there's a man that that, created a tape called dead doctors don't lie. And he's right. They don't. They're dead.
They starved to death. They got old. They refused to feed their bodies the nutrient values you need. And the more fertilizers they use and the more craziness that they use in the soil, the more stuff that they do, the less nutrient value is in that food. The less colloids are in that food for you to utilize.
So you need to supplement your stuff and you need to do it with colloids. Believe me, folks. The whole trick is in colloids. And that research was done in Rockefeller Center in the thirties where they used just colloids to bring back to life dead flowers. Dead flowers dried.
They sprayed colloids on them, and even the petals came to life. So the secret is in colloids. Every single thing you need, everything you need, your body has to turn into a colloid. Every bit of food you eat, your body eat, your body can't use it unless it turns it into a colloid. And if it can't, it's waste.
And with all the drugs and the chemicals in all our foods, what we're running into plant now gets into your body and drags your vibration down, sets up a vibratory rate in your body that parasites do extremely well in. And that's what the problem is. We need to clean up. We need to do it. We need to flush the body out with some stuff that's actually gonna work.
And we need to handle disease desperately. We need to get on it. There's all kinds of things happening on this planet that are, not so good. And it's being caused by filth. All you have to do is do what I do, fly all over the country and have a look at the air.
I was going into Denver, and the pilot came on and said, it's an absolute beautiful day. Not a cloud in the sky, and it's sun shining, and we're at 6,000 feet. And we'll be in Denver for you right on time. And guess what? We couldn't see the ground from the smog.
On that day, the air was still, and we could not see the ground from this for the smog. We were 6,000 feet. And yet, he said, there's not a cloud in the sky, and it's a beautiful day. My word. I couldn't believe it.
That's our problem. So next meeting. My gasoline device is finished, ready for your cars, doubles your gas mileage. Okay? That's my next invention.
It's all finished, ready to go. And if I'm invited to the next do, I'm gonna bring the 2nd dimensional time unit. I'm gonna actually bring it, and set it up, and make it work. And show it to you. Okay?
So that's the way it's going. And I imagine after February, March, April, we won't be able to talk this way anymore. We won't be able to mention parasites. We won't be able to to mention anything. And, you're on your own after that.
Okay? So this is Wayne Rowland bidding you goodbye. And all we got left is a gas device. And how long will I be able to talk about that? I don't know.
At least we'll be rid of the FDA. Thank you, folks. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Wayne.
And, his
reSee.it AI Summary
Don't miss the full documentary "Epidemic of Fraud" tomorrow at 8PM ET, free for Broken Truth website subscribers. TikTok banned the video and its trailer. Sign up today to find out what they don't want you to know.
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
WHY DID TIKTOK BAN THIS VIDEO? Tomorrow at 8PM ET don't miss the full documentary "Epidemic of Fraud", free for Broken Truth website subscribers. Find out what else they don't want you to know. Sign up today at http://BrokenTruth.com.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hydroxychloroquine, a derivative of Chloroquine, has a long history dating back to quinine, used to treat malaria. Quinine's scarcity led to conflicts in wars like the American Revolution and World War II. The gin and tonic drink was born from soldiers mixing quinine with alcohol. The drug's importance continued with American troops overseas, but derivatives like mefloquine have caused issues. Access to these drugs has been restricted in various wars. The history of hydroxychloroquine and quinine is not widely known, raising questions about control over scientific institutions and medical education.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is hydroxychloroquine? Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of Chloroquine, one of the first malarial drugs invented. Chloroquine was based off of a drug called quinine. Quinine is also credited as the first chemical compound used to treat an infectious disease. Quinine was initially ground from the bark of a cinchona tree.
It was given to settlers from Spain by Indians near Peru in 1600 and brought to the Western world as a cure for malaria. Eventually, Jesuit priests traveled the world with cinchona bark, so much so that it was commonly known as Jesuits bark. In 17/51, the Spanish crown took control of all the sources of quinine, restricting access as a new form of scientific based imperialism. At the beginning of the American Revolution, George Washington requested his political masters buy up as much cinchona bark and quinine powder as possible, a deciding factor in the fate of the new nation. Because in 17/78, the Spanish crown restricted British access to quinine.
In 18/20, quinine was officially isolated, reducing the need for cinchona tree bark. That development opened the door of European exploration to all of Africa, considered at the time the white man's grave yard, due to how many Europeans died from malaria on the continent. In the 1860s, during the American Civil War, Southern states relied heavily on shipping for goods, services, and medications. So Honest Abe Lincoln and his advisors enacted the Northern blockade to block cotton shipments to Europe, weapons imports, and quinine. Lincoln's goal with blocking quinine was to create as many sick and dead southern soldiers as possible, because a sick soldier slows down an army and drains resources.
This ultimately means that Abraham Lincoln could be considered by some a practitioner of biological warfare against men and women, young and old, free and slave. Things were so desperate for the south that John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's alleged assassin, smuggled quinine to friends and family. In their desperation, southern doctors searched for native plants and trees local to the south to replace Cinchona. The one that came up the most? The bark of a dogwood tree.
When the information was provided to doctors across the South that they had a potential alternative, the doctors didn't use it because they felt it hadn't had enough clinical trials and didn't want to be considered homeopaths. Where have we heard that before?
Speaker 1: The information that you're referring to specifically is anecdotal. It was not done in the controlled clinical trial, so you really can't make any definitive statement about it.
Speaker 0: The role of quinine in war doesn't stop there. In the 18 sixties, malaria was a major issue for English soldiers in India. So soldiers began combining the bitter tasting quinine with water and an alcoholic beverage to get their daily dose of the life saving medicine. Thus, the gin and tonic was born. The medicinal beverage was so important to the crown that Winston Churchill stated
Speaker 1: The gin and tonic drink has saved more Englishmen's lives and minds than all the doctors of the empire.
Speaker 0: With Africa opened up to exploration, European countries vied for colonies and power in Africa, creating rivalries that influenced World War I. By the 19 thirties, the primary locations for growing cinchona moved from South America to India and Indonesia, lands that soon be cut off to the Allies. In World War II, the United States was desperate for a source of quinine in Cinchona and returned to South America in a series of cinchona missions to build a supply chain and protect Allied troops. At the same time, Nazi scientists weaponized mosquitoes with malaria. The Nazis then conducted experiments on prisoners with these mosquitoes at Dachau Concentration Camp.
Many of these prisoners were Jesuit priests. As World War II drew to a close, when United States and the United Kingdom troops advanced on Rome, the German troops cut window screens of all the homes in the region, confiscated quinine from the residents, and allegedly released their weaponized malaria loaded mosquitoes. The advancing Allied troops were ready and protected with quinine, cinchona, and chloroquine. But the local population of Italians weren't so lucky. That year, there was a massive spike in civilian casualties from malaria, a parting gift from the fleeing Nazis.
Hydroxychloroquine and drugs like it continue to be important over the years. For decades, American troops overseas have taken Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, and other derivatives of those drugs. One of those derivatives, mefloquine, has been implicated in causing post traumatic stress disorder and neurological issues with troops that were stationed in Iraq. The issues surrounding mefloquine are so great that the drug received a black box warning, the FDA's most stringent warning possible. For centuries now, the restriction of access to hydroxychloroquine, quinine, and drugs like them has been a standard tactic of warfare.
It was involved in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, countless smaller wars all across the planet, and most importantly, what one day may be remembered as World War 3. We've spoken with numerous pharmacists, doctors, and academics, and very few of them knew the history of hydroxychloroquine and quinine. It makes you wonder, who's really in control of our scientific institutions? And what are we teaching our medical doctors?
Broken Truth
Broken Truth - Exposing Fraud and Corruption
brokentruth.com
@BrokenTruthTV - Broken Truth
From TIKTOK. Tiktok also banned the trailer we posted the other day. https://t.co/tNwhyIyRvR
@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch
The same clip was posted on Instagram and Instagram removed it. So they really don’t want you to watch this. Which is why you need to repost it so everyone will see it. https://t.co/efg4EEbAeb
@itsreallyleah - LEAHmemes
Our Docuseries continues with Part 3. Please share this important message! https://t.co/CXDxwkBzqL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Understanding a child's condition is crucial for parents, as they need to accurately interpret medical advice. Children with intellectual disabilities, often labeled as slow learners, have historically faced limited options, but today they can receive support tailored to their needs. These children, who may struggle with abstract concepts, are taught to engage with the tangible world. As they transition into adulthood, challenges arise, such as difficulty reading job applications or handling basic math in a technology-driven society. The pressure to compete is absent, allowing for a focus on individual progress. Continuous psychological testing and support are essential from childhood through adolescence to help navigate these challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She's got the strength when especially when she's under a tantrum, she can really throw a lot of strength around her.
Speaker 1: Control over her.
Speaker 0: It's really scary.
Speaker 1: Parental understanding is a most important first step in any plan of action to help a retarded child. Exactly what do the parents know about their child's condition? Have they correctly interpreted what their doctor has told them?
Speaker 0: She said quadri.
Speaker 1: Now they know that within their own community is a fixed point. A special place to which they can return for help when they need it. This is an example of the slow learner. Until recent years, the only alternative was keep up with the majority or drop out and become another kind of statistic in the community. The most handicapping are encouraged to use their minds and bodies as best they can.
Today, a retarded child may not need the services of the diagnostic and referral center for years at a time. Boys like this are retarded. These girls whose minds cannot fathom abstract ideas have been patiently taught to deal with the world of tangible things. In the educator's jargon, they too are in a trainable class. What happens when a retarded child becomes a retarded adult?
An adult who cannot read and comprehend a job application. Who cannot deal with simple numbers in an age of rapid computers. 400,000,000 billion dollars. What does he do? Where does he turn?
There is no pressure to produce at a given competitive pace. Each so many questions about retardation remain unanswered.
Speaker 0: Very good.
Speaker 1: Psychological testing of the retarded is a continuous process from childhood through adolescence at the permanent information and counseling center.
@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Britain's banned documentary - SILENCED
Video Transcript AI Summary
This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his personal experience of being silenced by a gagging order after losing a court case. The video discusses the case of Bailey McLaren and Jamal, two students involved in a school incident, challenging the media's portrayal of Jamal as a victim and Bailey as a bully. Evidence is presented that contradicts the narrative, including Jamal's history of violent behavior. The speaker criticizes biased reporting by journalists like Piers Morgan and Jeremy Vine. The involvement of a jihadist lawyer and Antifa activists in the case is exposed. The man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury and YouTuber Dick Coughlin of promoting violence and hatred against him and his family. He questions the integrity of the legal system and expresses concern for the safety of witnesses. The video raises questions about media accountability, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The documentary you're about to watch is the most important documentary I've ever made. This story is far bigger than Tommy Robinson. This is about the weaponization and the politicization of these buildings. Court buildings across the west. The Royal Courts of Justice, ironically named.
These buildings have been weaponized and used against members of the public to destroy them if they speak out. From Donald Trump to Steve Bannon, to Gert Wilders, to Marie Le Pen, to Katie Hopkins. That's what's happening. My job as a journalist, I stand for freedom of speech. I stand for freedom of press.
And I failed. Because 3 years ago, when I lost a court case in here, then they banked me to the tune of £1,600,000. On a documentary, you're gonna see the entire story was a lie. Okay? I failed because I should have come out of court and I should have played you that film.
Why didn't I play you that film? Because I was given a gagging order by this building, by this judge. I was silent and I allowed them to silence me because I was scared. I was scared of 2 years in prison. I was scared of the effect that solitary confinement for that length of time would have on me.
I was scared of jihadi gangs in jail and I was scared of the effect it would have on my family. I failed me and I failed you. I'm not gonna fail myself again. You're now gonna watch the best citizen journalism and the most incredible expose of the establishment you've ever seen. The news is how we find out what's happening in the world.
It's how we form our opinions. Opinions based on facts. That's the key. Facts. Facts should be delivered to you by journalists based on the truth.
But what if what they're delivering you isn't the truth? What if it's stories that are manipulated to make you think a certain way, to follow a certain narrative, different people's agendas? And what do they do to those who go against that mainstream narrative? Those who try to expose the truth. This is a documentary about the lengths they will go to to shut down and silence anyone from bringing you, the British public, the truth.
Alright. Smell me off. Obviously, not me.
Speaker 1: I lost my job over this. No. I'm just kidding this.
Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit.
Speaker 3: He's won the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it.
Speaker 2: Well, it's all very liberating.
Speaker 4: This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. I'm not
Speaker 5: standing.
Speaker 0: You're not going, but No. Because no. Because what yous are doing, I know what yous are doing.
Speaker 6: Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, aye. This is a documentary
Speaker 0: about the a documentary about the unholy alliance between the media, the justice system, and our politicians. How they conspire to suppress free speech, how they pervert democracy, and how the truth and your freedoms are just 2 of the casualties. We will show how the mainstream media deceives people, how they ignore the truth, how the lies of the virtue signalling, BBC, IT Fear, and Channel 4 are all about their poisonous agenda, no matter the cost to innocent people. It's also a documentary about how an everyday playground incident between 2 young lads was spun into global news at a terrible cost to so many people, not least the 2 young lads themselves. We will show how the law is being abused, how people driven by hateful ideologies attempt to intimidate and silence anyone who dares to challenge the so called progressive, so called liberal narrative.
We will show the foolishness of our fear driven political leaders who jumped on a story, took a side without knowing the truth, or worse still, knowing it but hiding it because the truth didn't fit their narrative regardless of the human cost. And we'll ask 3 important questions. Firstly, is the media accountable to anyone in any way for what they report? Years after the Levinson inquiry, has anything changed, or do they continue to act with impunity? Secondly, is our legal system still fit for purpose?
We will show how lawyers who hate Britain but love jihadi warriors have weaponized the law system against us and how the legal system really only works for the rich. And finally, how do we keep our politicians accountable? If the police, the cause, and the state can silence anyone for speaking inconvenient truths, truths that may raise questions about government policy? Is the UK any different from China, Russia, or Iran in their treatment of dissidents? And, of course, for Piers Morgan, for Jeremy Fine, for the BBC ITV, and channel 4, it's a tutorial on journalism.
Keep watching it. You'll learn. Our story appears to start and end in a brief playground incident at Ormondbury Community School in Huddersfield. A playground scuffle. One boy poured a bottle of water on another child.
The school dealt with it and that should have been that. 3 weeks later, however, a video clip of the incident surfaced and within hours, with the help of lawyers and the ignorant rant ins of ITV's Piers Morgan and the BBC's Jeremy Vine, it was made into global news event. And the lives of so many people were turned upside down. Such playground incidents happen every day. So why was this spat between 2 boys transformed into global news?
Well, one of the boys was white and the other a Syrian refugee, at which point the truth of the matter was buried beneath an avalanche of agendas and opportunism. Within hours, the race hate brigade was sharpening their blades.
Speaker 7: But clearly when somebody comes from Syria fleeing Assad's regime, coming to a place like this, when they get treated that way, that's an issue, and the whole world is looking at us.
Speaker 0: Where are we? We're in Almunbury. Do I say the scene of the incident? Is it a scene in it's the incident? It's the scene of the great lie.
I call it the great lie because this lie was pushed around the globe. Yeah? This here is the school where the world was told a Syrian refugee was waterboarded by a racist English bully. It was in a playing field here, and do you know what? This is the first time I've been here.
Because when this blew up on the news, it's a child's school. Kids are in school. I didn't come outside here. You see the scenes outside here where the imam was here with mobs of men. Yeah?
Mobs of Muslim men. Extremists traveled up from London such as Ali Dua to cause a scene outside this this kids' school. Anyway, but I'm here. Why am I here? I'm here because I faced a court case.
I'm being prosecuted. It's gone it's gone to the high court, and I have to prove I made a video stating that it was a lie, stating that Jamal wasn't innocent, and telling some facts about Jamal beating up girls, an instance that I've been warned about by the members of this community to tell the truth about what happened at this school. I've gotta prove it in court, so I've come to Huddersfield. I'm now gonna knock. I need to find witnesses.
I've got addresses for many. I need to knock and talk to them and see who I can get to come to court to help me prove to you, the public, this is about as much as proven in court as proving to you, the British public, that I was the only journalist in the country who told the truth about what happened in this community. The story you were told. You were told a vulnerable Syrian child refugee had been bullied and waterboarded by a nasty white boy. You were told it was a racist attack.
You were told of the dangers of Far Right extremism. You were invited to agree that this kind of intolerance could not be tolerated. Was he vulnerable? Was it a racist attack? Our evidence shows the answers to both these questions was no.
Was the Syrian lad waterboarded? Why was this word used? What about this? No. Was that waterboarding?
Take a look at this. It shows a group of non white children beating up a white girl. It went viral online, but it wasn't touched by the mainstream media. It wasn't made into a global story. Why not?
Meanwhile, the usual suspects had lit the fire and were gleefully stoking the flames.
Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution.
Speaker 0: And of course, the politicians. They're always quick to jump on the bandwagon. Theresa May, Sajid Javid, Naz Shah, Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill's grandson. Such moral outrage. And it's not just the media and the politicians.
In today's Twitter and Facebook driven worlds where celebrities and groups compete to virtue signal, most of them driven by the warm feeling they get by expressing their moral outrage or by fear. The fear of what might happen to them if they don't. Everyone who's anyone pumped the Bailey Jamal story. Boxers, Lennox Lewis, Huddersfield Football Club, celebrities from across the globe. Let's have a look at all of the celebrities and Blue Tick Brigade who pumped the Jamal story.
And here are some of the people who pumped the story you watched earlier of the white girl getting beaten up. Sadly, whether it's politicians, celebrities, or other groups, None of them are wise enough or pause long enough to ask whether they have the whole story, to check the facts, to find the truth. But why let the truth get in the way of such a good story? And this story was just too good a story. 2 lads in a playground scrap is not international news, but racist white thug water boards helpless Syrian refugee.
Boom. Racism can't be tolerated. Beware of the far right. That's their kind of story. We'll hear more about the militant left later but they clearly weren't gonna miss out on this.
Speaker 7: Well, we well, representing might be too harsh a word, but I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm here as as a concerned citizen.
Speaker 0: Mohammed Amin Pandur, a Mufti on a mission. He rushed to Ulman Bire from his mosque in Bali, a town at the far end of the district. In fact, there's 40 mosques closer to this school. But perhaps Mufti Pandor had his own agenda. You see, his little brother, Councillor Shabir Pandor, is the leader of Kirkland East Councilman Huntsfield.
And they were having some pretty bad news days at that time. By the way, Mufti Pandor, he's the same guy who ordered the Islamic mob to come to the school in Batley and demand the second of the RE teacher who showed a cartoon of Mohammed in a discussion about free speech.
Speaker 7: Look look at what we do as a community, and you'll understand our stance. So what has happened is totally unacceptable. Yeah? And we have made sure that the school understands that. The teacher has been suspended.
The teacher has been suspended.
Speaker 0: You may recall the teacher had to flee, and he's still in hiding under police protection. Luckily, he hasn't ended up like Samuel Patti, the French teacher who's beheaded for having a similar discussion in a classroom about free speech. You see, free speech is essential for any society wishing to maintain intellectual and social progress, but not all societies are bothered about intellectual and social progress. Should we be silenced by the demands of Mufti Pandor and Sharia Law? Should we sacrifice our freedom of speech?
Should we sacrifice the free and open exchange of ideas? Should we sacrifice the cultural inheritance of which we are all custodians? But back to the bad news days in Kirklees and the playground incident in 2018. There was also Kirklees counselor, Masood Ahmed.
Speaker 9: I'm not aware of there's a problem at the school. That's something I obviously need to find out in terms of that there is a problem at this school, and that is something I will definitely be picking up.
Speaker 0: Now some of you may remember this.
Speaker 10: Michael, are you gonna explain what's gonna happen next? Right?
Speaker 0: Are you being arrested?
Speaker 7: You won't be arrested.
Speaker 0: I am being arrested.
Speaker 5: A breach of peace.
Speaker 0: I'm of course.
Speaker 5: Of the I'm of
Speaker 7: course a breach of peace.
Speaker 0: I'm being arrested. The content of what
Speaker 5: you're Can
Speaker 11: we just
Speaker 5: say streaming The content of what I'm streaming told. I'm being
Speaker 10: arrested for breach of peace. The game. I've been
Speaker 0: Can you
Speaker 12: just turn off your
Speaker 11: life, please? Yeah.
Speaker 5: Do you want to someone just What's that?
Speaker 11: Can you
Speaker 0: just explain it again? You want to
Speaker 13: rest in suspicion
Speaker 5: following the breach of the people?
Speaker 0: What what does that mean? What what does that mean? At the same time as this playground spat between 2 young lads, 20 Huddersfield men were being jailed across Yorkshire at Leeds Crown Court for what would be the biggest grooming gang Britain has ever seen. Ultimately, 35 almost exclusively Muslim men would be given 380 years in prison for grooming, trafficking, and raping young children, most of whom were known to counsely Pandora's Kirklees Council. Mufti Pandor traveled for half an hour to rabble rouse a gang outside the school gates over this playground incident.
When within a couple of mile radius in Batley, police have arrested a further 99 men in relation to historic sex crimes. So far 32 have been charged including 1 Ibrahim Pandor, 41 of Batley. That makes it the highest destination of grooming gang arrests anywhere in the UK. We Googled to see what Mufti Pandor has said about these grooming gang atrocities. Nothing.
We Googled to see what counsel and sued Ahmed's condemnation. Nothing. In fact we can't find the condemnation from the of these brother either, Councillor Shabir Pandor, leader of the council. Just one statement from him reported in June 2019, telling the National Working Group of Child Sexual Eratiation Response Unit that his authority had moved forward. That's it.
They've moved on. Never mind grooming gangs, gang rape of young children, all these men seem to be far more concerned about what happened in a playground at Ormerbury Community School or about cartoons of their prophet Mohammed. I think I now realize how difficult this is gonna be because everyone we've spoke to today,
Speaker 1: they're all confirming what I
Speaker 0: said was true. Everyone's confirming what Jamal was like, including school staff. But as soon as I mention this camera, as soon as I mention court, I need someone to come to court, they're just totally silent straight away. No. We no.
No one can have said that. No one can have said this. You jump in. It's raining. But I'm realizing how difficult it's gonna be but I have got an idea for that now after today.
So but first stop, McDonald's. Yeah? Let's go to McDonald's because I'm starving. It's been a long day.
Speaker 13: Yeah. I'll see you on a YouTube.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Nice to
Speaker 13: see you.
Speaker 0: Smaller in real life. Nice to see you.
Speaker 5: Nice to meet
Speaker 0: you, mate.
Speaker 13: Carry off on your drink.
Speaker 0: No. I'm fine. Thank you. Cheers, though. You're good.
Yeah. Thanks, man. Oh, man. Very nice to see you. Oh, thank you, bro.
Hello?
Speaker 2: Steve, how
Speaker 0: are you, mate? It's Tommy. How
Speaker 11: are you?
Speaker 0: I'm good, mate. Doing good. Bro, mate, have you still got all those hidden cameras?
Speaker 5: Yeah. Of course, I have. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Could I borrow them? You need Yeah. But when I say borrow them, can I borrow I'm gonna need to take them for weeks because I've got so much to do? It's a long story. I'll explain when I see you.
But, I'm in a bit of a situation. I need some hidden cameras.
Speaker 5: This is not a problem. I have put some kit together for you.
Speaker 0: That's it. So that's the idea. The idea is I've got a friend there, secret Steve, who has all sorts of cameras, yeah. He's a he's a private investigator. I need to show the public everything I've heard today.
I need the public to hear and know the truth. I need them to know how much they've been lied to by the media about what happened in this town. And, the only way, unfortunately, the only way I'm gonna be able to do that is with hidden cameras. Because today, I've heard the truth, but I need everyone of you to know the truth, and everyone's too scared. That's why I said Project Fear.
Everyone is too scared to speak the truth or to come to court. So I'm gonna end up getting I'm gonna end up getting hammered in court. The whole world told I've lied when I haven't. I was the only journalist in the UK who told the truth. So we need to prove it.
So we'll shoot down the motorway now. We'll go get these hidden cameras. These are all so this is a tie. There's a camera in that. That's the camera.
Mad, isn't it? There's a camera there. You've got everything here. Cameras, glasses. I don't wear glasses.
That's gonna be awkward. That's the bottom of a cup coffee cup. So you put that on the bottom of the coffee cup. I feel like James Bond. This today, that's the camera.
I'll have to take this off, but it doesn't matter because apparently this records all the audio, records everything. That's the camera and I feel a little bit dirty doing this. But it is the only way I'm gonna get people to speak. And then I need you to hear what I hear.
Speaker 1: The idea that people would move over the streets looking for him was appalling. The fact that the video itself, although it showed the accumulation of things that built up to that, did not deserve what happened to him or to anybody else in that situation. We knew that I'm afraid the media, I call it a perfect storm. I was getting, emails from Pakistan, from Australia, from America telling me to resign. So it went worldwide, and I'm afraid I came into teaching to help poor people, and they got me today.
I've got a problem here. I lost my job over this. And as a result, the council has told me that I cannot speak to anybody ever about it. So unfortunately When you asked to go over to me about anything? I was there when it happened.
I was there when I dealt with all the situation. And then, Ofsted came, then Trevor wasn't there anymore. That's that's all I can say. Well, I can't get a job. So that's where it's left me.
And I can live with that, but barely only 15. I'm not with her. That's different.
Speaker 11: It's got a
Speaker 1: pretty good man. It's a young man with No. No. If I do,
Speaker 5: I think
Speaker 0: you get
Speaker 1: myself into
Speaker 11: real trouble. No. Okay.
Speaker 1: I thought really serious trouble. Legal trouble because partly cancels You signed an NDA or something? Correct. So they've said, you can't be split free. I'm not with the NDA so you keep the pension.
So you get pension? Yeah. Fucking hell, bro. I have to be very careful about what I say to it. I'm not allowed to talk about it.
I really am not. So I can't discuss it. I can't discuss it with the media. I always wanted to have my say against it, which I've never had, Never been allowed to have. Never be allowed to say goodbye to my staff.
They're just told to leave. So I've worked there nearly 30 years. Actually, 20 years and never got a card, never got a goodbye. This whole thing was just used. The whole thing was used.
Yes. Could push him in over there. And hijacked and by by by the right of it politic I'm quite a political person by the right and the left. It was hijacked and spun all out of the position and now we've got problems. That's interesting.
What? I thought she looked 1 more meters of all the silence. What a mess. It is a it is a mess, but but it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy for Bailey.
I'm not sure, Jamar, will get anything out of this ever in his life, positive out of it either. Necessarily, might have he might have got a few, silver coins from Julius, but that's about it. You know, that that's it. The thing is that they haven't 6 weeks, prior or weeks prior. And then in the same day at the same time, if you look for the to go fund me up, the site was released.
Yeah. Now you see your full picture together?
Speaker 0: Already, that's gold. Yeah. I know that's gold. All I hope, I hope that's recorded. I can't turn a computer on.
So I just pray that's got the audio and the visual and it's not pointing up there that we've got it because that was the head teacher and that's the first visit. And I know this is gonna work. So I now need I know just off that, I didn't think he'd talk before he shut the door on my face. He didn't. He seemed like he wanted to talk.
There's a lot he wants to say. So but, yeah, let's go. Next stretch. Yeah? It's exciting.
Was there a racism problem in the school and
Speaker 5: Well, no. I don't I don't I don't think there was.
Speaker 0: What about other Syrian refugees? Like, do you think what happened to Jamal in the school was because he was a Syrian refugee?
Speaker 5: No. Not at all. I told you before That that would have happened
Speaker 1: No, ma'am.
Speaker 5: If the child was white, big, blue, whatever color.
Speaker 0: They're all scared.
Speaker 5: Yeah. A lot of careers on there. I work for operation service now.
Speaker 0: You do now?
Speaker 5: Yeah. So I don't know where I stand with it. If I go, I could lose the job.
Speaker 1: What about if
Speaker 0: you know, I don't want You
Speaker 5: know what someone said? I work
Speaker 0: I get it, bro.
Speaker 5: I work for probation service now. You see, if
Speaker 0: I didn't work for You see, if you're someone
Speaker 5: If I didn't if I didn't work for the fucking public sector no more, I'd say, god, they can go fuck themselves. They can't. You know what I mean?
Speaker 0: So they seem to be pretty keen on these NDAs.
Speaker 1: Who is that?
Speaker 5: That is counsel. But I can't disclose that with you. That's what? Lords. I'm saying I can't disclose it because I Yes.
Assigned it.
Speaker 1: That incident was talked about by Theresa May at a g twenty summit. He asked her a question about it. We were then offsteaded by 5 of the top inspectors in the country. We'd only send 1 registered inspector. We have the head of safeguarding.
We are I had a member speaking to me about it. If you want my opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shut that school. Get up there and get rid of this.
Speaker 0: Get rid of the problem.
Speaker 1: Over to the Bailey.
Speaker 0: Correct. Over to Mal.
Speaker 11: Correct. Get rid
Speaker 1: of the problem. Over to Mal. Correct. Get rid of the problem. Get rid of it.
But why do you think that is? Do you think because I'm not Jamal. Jamal, because he come here 2 years ago. I've got so many negative things said about it now for so many people. Well, I mean, so many.
You in a few before. We have non Syrian children. Non families. Yep. We're not one issue.
Speaker 0: Well, Well, my my view is
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: That you won't get much of an answer out of all because you work there and it's bound by various confidentiality. So
Speaker 1: Long disclosure of business.
Speaker 0: Do you get paid as well? Not been to me.
Speaker 1: They all have. Every teacher got paid not to tell the truth.
Speaker 0: But the head teacher can't even talk about Jamelle at all.
Speaker 2: No. No. They cannot.
Speaker 1: Both, can you? Shouldn't it?
Speaker 0: Well, if you work it out, it must be a good one.
Speaker 1: Mustn't it? Did
Speaker 0: you work
Speaker 1: there as well?
Speaker 2: No. I was the chair of goodness there. But so it's it's not What my issue
Speaker 0: is is
Speaker 2: you're not gonna get anywhere.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And Rob wouldn't talk to you either. So it's
Speaker 0: They're trying to
Speaker 12: It's pointless me even giving you I told but
Speaker 0: I told the truth. Your contact details Okay. Wouldn't work with us.
Speaker 1: I told the truth about
Speaker 0: what happened that day.
Speaker 10: I am not even arguing.
Speaker 1: His life was destroyed.
Speaker 2: Well, that's not fair either, is it?
Speaker 0: As a racist bully, and he won't. And he wasn't. I know. And
Speaker 2: I both know that.
Speaker 14: Truth is just
Speaker 1: How much money is it?
Speaker 5: I can't see the figure because if I see the figure, it goes out.
Speaker 1: Because, mate 18. 18.
Speaker 0: I've just found out. Well, the head teacher's told us already that he was blackmailed and threatened. I've just found out of Kumar. He was paid £18,000. Paid he said, I can't take I signed.
I I was paid. So paid what? He was paid money by the local council, so he can't tell the truth about what's going on in that school. Then they've they've give everyone non disclosure agreements from school staff to governors to and and Paul Coomar to get £18,000. He's not even involved.
If you live here, if you live in this area, your tax money he's got 18 grand what must the head teacher have got? He must have got 6 figures. How much money have they spent on this lie? We put in a freedom of information request to Kirklees Council to find out exactly how much they had spent of taxpayers' money to get the silence of their staff. They didn't answer the first request.
They avoided the second. Only when we sent them legal letters because they have to, by law, answer these questions, did we get our answer. They had spent over a quarter of £1,000,000. £275,000 of taxpayers' money was spent making people remain silent. But they've they've they've spent money silencing everybody, so no one can ever this is for ever, once you sign that agreement, no one can ever tell the truth While they push this manufactured lie that destroyed lives, schools, communities, everyone's life.
I've seen life after life after life, person after person's life destroyed, while the council, your local council, Kirkley's council, give away 100 of £1,000 to make sure that the truth can never be told. I can't believe it. I knew from day dot, I asked myself the question, when this was blowing up and I knew the truth, I kept saying, how come no teacher is telling the truth? If all those teachers know what's going on in that school, how come none of them are coming out and saying? Well, now we know.
Now the whole world's gonna know, because corporate council paid them not to. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Jamal was in India?
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was in the same
Speaker 11: well. What was his what
Speaker 0: was Jamal's attitude about in school?
Speaker 3: He wasn't very nice. He called female teachers bitches. He just didn't really have respect for the female students, to be honest. Yeah. Basically, we were in a p lesson, and we were playing hockey with a teacher called Mr.
Cattell. And I had taken the hockey puck off of Jamal, because I was on the other team, and sent it to the other side of the room where my team mates were. And I then turned around and just felt a really sharp pain in my back, and he'd swung the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it.
Speaker 0: Is there do you think there's any way that could have been an accident?
Speaker 3: No. It knocked me to my knees.
Speaker 0: It knocked you to your knees. How how long have your mom been in school when this happened?
Speaker 3: About 2 weeks. I've had lasting injuries from it. It's caused me to have severe pain in my top in the top of my back and, I'm on medication for the pain.
Speaker 0: Still now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Did
Speaker 0: Jamelle get in trouble for this?
Speaker 3: Not that I'm aware of.
Speaker 0: First, I wanna apologize to anyone I've been forced to record with a hidden camera. Sadly, people are terrified to tell the truth because of the potential consequences, but the truth still needs to be told.
Speaker 1: Do you know if you do remember of any any incident specifically with tomorrow with those?
Speaker 2: Well, do you remember that one there, it it got go with octetick, won't it?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Charlie.
Speaker 2: Charlie. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Don't get the name there. Yeah. You must go. Lovely little girl. Yeah.
Speaker 2: It just
Speaker 0: wrote to him
Speaker 2: of not sure to bloody nasty. No
Speaker 10: he was, like, to the side of me. So he tried, like, pushing me and, like, so I quickly moved out there because obviously I knew what he would like. He would have actually hit me and stuff. Mhmm. So I moved and then he, like, moved his arms if he were gonna try and stop my face, like, back.
Okay.
Speaker 0: And he dropped but he did, but on that day, he spat
Speaker 1: at you. What was on? Where'd the spit go?
Speaker 10: Like, literally, all on me and if I'm outside and all down the school bag. Because when I went home, I told mum and mum we were disgusted in it. But the school said that that because it was outside of school time, so can't really do much about
Speaker 5: it. Okay.
Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit.
Speaker 1: Was he?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And dad.
Speaker 1: 2.
Speaker 2: Everybody and anybody. It does it has no respect for women at all. None. Did he even snap? No response from
Speaker 11: him? No.
Speaker 2: I told I told his father to all this on phone.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 4: Jamal grabbed him by his tie and was just threw him against the wall, cracked his head up and he gets back at wall and just kept throwing against the wall. This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. That's just intent to kill.
Speaker 1: Were they?
Speaker 10: They had, a young lad and a girl. And they were absolutely they were horrendous. The kids, they were just horrific. The the kids that they are, they used to bully the kids.
Speaker 1: Oh, Jamal. Yeah.
Speaker 0: See, what was
Speaker 11: what
Speaker 5: was Jamal like though? The dickhead.
Speaker 1: Was he?
Speaker 5: He spent he he came to isolation a few times. He want he want perfect child?
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 5: He was the same. Well, you know what Joe Biden did, don't you?
Speaker 0: He was in isolation? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: That's what he's in other times.
Speaker 0: Was he?
Speaker 11: Yeah. What
Speaker 1: was he like, though?
Speaker 5: Troublesome, Charles. Yeah. He's a makeup fucking star, he's
Speaker 0: He used to make up stories.
Speaker 5: Yeah. At at one stage, I think you see something to do with your sister. Somebody said something to his sister that I was in isolation. I just go come out and he was waiting outside isolation. I wanted to be the girl or for someone.
I can't can't remember.
Speaker 0: He want to be here. Yeah.
Speaker 5: They did ask someone to his sister. Just one second. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No problem.
Speaker 5: Yeah. No problem. Well, you you you you want you want he used to lie lie a lot.
Speaker 0: But this whole thing was built with what he said. And if you lied a lot, light, it's a big problem.
Speaker 1: What was that over?
Speaker 5: Him. Oh, no. It's whatever. Oh, no. It's whatever.
Or we want this or not. Did you
Speaker 0: like that with lots of kids? Not really. No. Just certain kids?
Speaker 11: Yeah. I would
Speaker 0: say I'm like, he's got an insurance group. So he thought he could? Yeah. Yeah. So he just randomly attacked you?
Yeah. Yeah. What about, your mom your mom just sank about he puts anything between his hands?
Speaker 15: Oh, yeah. It was a compass.
Speaker 16: I remembered it yesterday. It was just as you went.
Speaker 15: It was a compass. He got he got a compass, and he was going around like when
Speaker 0: he got to be
Speaker 15: with proper hearted to be able to be believed in everything. And I think it was miss Ennis that proper gave him a top telling off
Speaker 0: Okay. You know, you said so so say say like that instant there. You said some girl said something to my sister, and he walked away outside to beat her up. Well there are testimonies from several children who alleged they were being bullied by him. Younger children.
Little girls. Mostly girls. Is Jamal the innocent victim? You've been told. I gathered these testimonies over just a few hours filming in Huddersfield.
I could have carried on.
Speaker 5: Yeah. I was waiting outside my pleasure to be the yellow.
Speaker 0: And about the noise. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I'll say about Juwani used to tell fibs. There was several times he got investigated, and it just fucking turned out to be fucking lies.
Speaker 0: The fact he always lied is a big point. The fact that you know that the police the the school investigated incidents where he said things happened Yeah. And they turned out to be made up. Yeah.
Speaker 5: It was thieves. They couldn't have happened. It could happen because of of the one. The child were even in school that he accused.
Speaker 1: I can remember. Oh my god. Yeah. Oh my god.
Speaker 5: So I'm sure he accused us another guy called Jaden. I can't remember his last name.
Speaker 0: Called what?
Speaker 5: Jaden.
Speaker 0: Jaden.
Speaker 5: He accused he accused Jaden or someone. I'm a mean miss any investigative of complex.
Speaker 2: Not very likable, really.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 2: You know, about what we're gonna do to sisters and what have you bury aunt's office.
Speaker 1: I'm toddlers.
Speaker 2: But not a very nice boss.
Speaker 1: When you say what are
Speaker 0: you gonna do to your sisters?
Speaker 2: Well, I told Betty, wouldn't it?
Speaker 0: Tell Betty is your baby sister? Mhmm. Alright. And I'd
Speaker 1: try to argue that it was in the public's interest for them to know the truth about Jamelle.
Speaker 11: I know.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Unless they They were just retaliating. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You know, which most people know is from the side in the world's history.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Jamelle seems like every kid I spoke to that he attacked was younger.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Bullock.
Speaker 0: Jamelle. Hey, Jamelle. Yeah. Yes. That's what I'm fine now.
Yeah.
Speaker 5: That's what I remember. He said he would have stabbed him or something with a science or something. I remember. He said, yeah. So he goes to come and then what he's saying now.
Speaker 0: Because that thing of him getting caught with a knife in school. It's like, what? What with a knife
Speaker 1: and screwdriver? Bailey gets his tail thrown in
Speaker 0: a bottle of water.
Speaker 5: Yeah. What the fuck?
Speaker 0: Surely he gets
Speaker 5: a statement on that?
Speaker 0: No. Because it there's things missing.
Speaker 1: But I've got I've got his dad mentioned it in
Speaker 0: the minutes in the meeting. His dad mentioned it in the meeting with the school. His dad mentioned about them catching him with a knife and a screwdriver. His dad
Speaker 5: his dad bought it up. I've got it I've
Speaker 0: got it in black and white.
Speaker 5: Yeah. You got good case there?
Speaker 1: I've got
Speaker 0: I've got it. Yeah. He got caught with a knife. They they can't deny it. You see, the truth was there for the media.
It was there for celebrities and politicians to see. They could have told you the truth at the time before some of you gave over a £160,000 of your money to the poor victim, Jamal. Well, not so poor anymore. But none of this was true. A key part of this case is that I reported what I was told.
Before my involvement in this story, a mother went online and said her daughter had been attacked by Jamal. I contacted that mother. She sent me images of her daughter. She said her little daughter was beaten by 3 Muslim girls and that Jamal jumped in and bit her daughter on the head. She sent me the images of the bite marks on her daughter's head.
I said, can I speak to you? Can I interview you? I rang the mother, but the child was too scared to talk to me.
Speaker 2: Too scared?
Speaker 0: No. No. Everyone's scared. A girl went online and said that she had been attacked by Jamal. Both of these victims deleted their comments why.
Both of these victims had gone online and reported this before my involvement at all in this case. I simply reported what they were saying. We revisited the mother's house to try and get confirmation as to why she backtracked on the story she had put out and the story she had told me.
Speaker 10: I got car if you're driving. Tony Robinson's there.
Speaker 0: Tell her not to worry, don't worry.
Speaker 12: He said don't worry. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So when you when you put online about Jamelle, what what what happened? Like what did you What happened, what was the response to that?
Speaker 5: What do you mean?
Speaker 0: I mean, did you receive did you receive
Speaker 14: I don't receive threats. Yeah, I did.
Speaker 1: What sort
Speaker 0: of threats?
Speaker 5: We all thought. All thought. Don't let all thought. And I'm just
Speaker 0: because I'm trying to understand this. Is that, and is that because and it because what I've what I've looked at and then because Jamelle's solicitors are using a statement that you made saying that, Jamelle had nothing to do with it. But was that I'm asking is that was that in response to the re reflects your seat that you received?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was. Okay.
Speaker 5: Liar. Straight. Is this a symbol just a liar? Jamal telling fibs all the time. There's several times investigated.
Fucking who found out that he's talking fucking shit.
Speaker 11: I don't
Speaker 0: think the whole but then I read Jamal reading reading was slightly a prepared statement on the news.
Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules.
Speaker 18: He used to break rule
Speaker 5: all the time. Yeah. He used to lie. He used to lie a lot. He lied several times.
He lied he lied several times. I caught him several times lying.
Speaker 0: He's suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. And I'm finding out after teacher after teacher after teacher he's far worse than what I said. Far worse. I mean, like, far worse. He was put up on a pedestal by every single media outlet, politicians, footballers, celebrities, boxers, everybody.
They're suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. All I'm knocking on the door and asking teacher after teacher after teacher is what was Jamal like? And it's just flowing. It's just boom. And he was far worse than anything I said.
Far worse. I find it insane because no there is no way that all the things I'm now finding out, the neither journalists has found this out. They must have known what it was like because it hasn't been hard.
Speaker 10: The Isle of Portrait, Port Bailey, the the spin. He was
Speaker 1: and that Jamal was an innocent woman in London too. He wasn't.
Speaker 10: Not far from that.
Speaker 0: So you were told Bailey was a bully and he was a racist. He wasn't a saint in school, he'd be the 1st to admit that, but he wasn't a bully or a racist. Police concluded there was nothing racist about the scuffle, yet you were told he was vermin. You were told he needed to be dealt with. He was vilified by the media, by politicians, and by celebrities.
Bailey a bully, Bailey a racist. Not according to his teachers and other children. Not according to his head teacher of his school. Who is this? He was
Speaker 1: a 15 year old kid Yeah. And it it would have been, could be, have a great future. He's a very articulate lad. He's got a lot of issue about justice. Yeah.
I think, you know, I could've seen him in a row or something like like that because he has that in him. Really? Yeah. And he would stand up for his peers in school where he felt things were. Yeah.
Yeah.
Speaker 11: You know, he would do that. I just wanna tell the truth
Speaker 1: about Vaden. Well His life was destroyed.
Speaker 2: Well, that's not
Speaker 1: fair either, is it?
Speaker 2: As a racist bully, and he won.
Speaker 13: And he wasn't.
Speaker 0: I know. And I both
Speaker 1: know that. I know. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 0: truth is just I know. I know. But Bailey didn't even get to sit his GCSEs because of this campaign of hate, this perversion of the truth. What about Jamal's broken arm? Which the world was told was because of bullying.
That was a like. School incident reports record that he had been punching a much younger child in the face while holding him in a headlock, and he was pushed off him, fell, and broke his arm. The police considered the incident to have been dealt with it properly.
Speaker 5: You were picking you were picking I think you picked I've got an old somebody pushed him to get him off.
Speaker 10: He started calling me my white fat bitch and stuff, and then he like Is
Speaker 0: that what you're my mate?
Speaker 11: I'm a
Speaker 10: white fat bitch.
Speaker 0: White fat bitch.
Speaker 10: And then, I went up to him, and then he like, I took I took the bottle and then he put me in a headlock, and then my mate pushed him off me. And I believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock.
Speaker 11: And I
Speaker 0: believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock? Yeah. So he he physically assaulted you?
Yeah.
Speaker 5: You said
Speaker 0: he called you mama white bitch.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Is
Speaker 0: that the sort of terminology he uses a lot? Yeah.
Speaker 1: There's all sorts of misconceptions like the fact that he had a broken arm.
Speaker 0: Oh, I've got 2 independent witnesses now.
Speaker 1: He he had a year 8 kid. And another kid in year 11 stepped in and said, what are you doing? Pushed him over. Poked him off.
Speaker 0: Who he had in the headlock?
Speaker 4: It was must have been just start of year 11, put this kid in a headlock. One of my friends, one of my friends, didn't like how he was behaving, grabbed him and just threw him off him. Like anyone do break up a fight, they just, like, throw him off him, but this wasn't a fight. This was an all out brawl, one-sided, completely one-sided, because this kid had no match against Jamal, just threw him off him and he landed on the curb.
Speaker 0: How did was he did? Jamal was in year 11?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Half half the size of Jamal, easily.
Speaker 0: Okay. You know, I know he was 12 and Jamal was 15. Mhmm.
Speaker 4: But he was like, kind of like half size ish, kind of like, up to shoulders kind of thing. Yeah. But he still had no match against him, And my friend just grabbed him, threw him off him, he landed on a curb, and that was like it.
Speaker 0: So I've read it reported in by Jeremy Biden and in the newspapers that that was an incident of Jamelle being bullied.
Speaker 4: No. Exact opposite. He was bullying this kid.
Speaker 1: So you see people thought that was all part of it.
Speaker 0: But that's do you know why somebody destroyed it
Speaker 1: for all your broken arm.
Speaker 0: But do you know why they
Speaker 11: do you know
Speaker 1: why they thought it was part of it?
Speaker 0: Because the solicitor said it was.
Speaker 1: No. Well, it's not it's not true. I'm telling you, it's not true. I could even name it I won't. But I could name the child in year 8 that he did it to.
Speaker 11: And I
Speaker 1: could name the child in year 11 that stepped in.
Speaker 0: So someone stepped in?
Speaker 1: Because basically, school school is a pretty good place. Kids have good values. So if you saw a bigger kid, you'd see a little kid. He said, oh, he stepped in and said, what are you doing? Yeah.
And we even had it where
Speaker 0: Do you know what he said to the year 8 kid? No. Called his mom on white slag?
Speaker 1: Yes. Now I've got that on camera, isn't it? Now you say it. Yes. He would have done that, and that would have been incredibly provocative for them.
Speaker 0: Even in his statement to court, Jamal claims they were forced to relocate from Huddersfield for their own safety to a different part of the country. Really? Because the records say there was no most racial motivation and there was no threat at home. That's what the records say. And this is why the authorities, they refused to move them.
And while all this was going on, records also show that his dad Jihad Yeah, his dad's name is Jihad. He'd threatened to kill himself if the rest of his family weren't brought in from Syria. It's not surprising that some authorities expressed concerns that Jihad Hijazi was trying to manipulate the system to get what he wanted, including their housing. You were not told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. You weren't told anything approaching the truth by the mainstream media.
And in Jihad's holy war statement to the court, Jihad said that he wished he had died in the war with his family, rather than go through what happened at Almanbury Community School. Really? He wished he was dead and all his family were dead rather than go through this school playground instant. Listen to the clip again. Listen to what Bailey's saying.
He's asking Jamal repeatedly. What are you saying now? It wasn't a random attack. It wasn't a racist attack. Bailey didn't threaten to stab Jamal.
The playground incident was not the beginning of the story. It was a culmination of many events. Not least, it was a response to Jamal's alleged threats to rape Bailey's younger sisters. They're about 9 years old at the time of this. So how's it going at that school when you saw the portrayal of what happened with Bailey and him.
Because he was painted as this innocent little kid.
Speaker 10: He was an innocent.
Speaker 11: He's out
Speaker 10: in there for a while. He's out in there. I used to see him bully Bailey's little sisters
Speaker 0: and stuff.
Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Hope his parents take action. Right? Never mind anything else. What what what what are you producing here with this vermin doing what he's doing here?
Speaker 16: That's not Britain. That's not what
Speaker 8: we do as a country.
Speaker 0: You can hear him there describe Bailey as vermin. Words are important when you're on a daytime platform and and people listen to what you say. What do you do to Vernon? You exterminate. You kill it.
Low life, called him a thug. But worst of all, he demanded severe retribution against this child. At the same time as this, Jeremy Vine was reporting. He didn't tell people the bully's name, although he was finding it hard not to name a child. Instead he told his followers where they could find that name.
Now this is a direct response of both of your reporting, because when you reported, you can follow the timeline and the repercussions of what that bore. What I've done here, in 2018 there's a charity called Tell Mama that records Muslim hate incidents. Even though they've been in the past penalised for exaggerating the figures, let's go, let's work off their figures. They say there are over a 1,000 hate instances with 325 of them being online. Some of them are Islamophobic, which means criticizing Islam as well.
Here, I've printed a piece of paper for each one of those hate incidents. 327 hate incidents online against the entire Muslim community of the UK in 2018. The 325 Islamophobic comments, they're the ones you read about on the news every day. They're the ones people are in jail for. They're the hate incidents the media keeps shoving down your throat.
So each piece of paper here represents a hate comment aimed at a child after a playground dispute. I want to read these now, and peers, you demanded severe retribution, that's what you demanded against this child. Let's see if you're happy with some of this. I pray someone rapes you and your whole family while you watch. Fuck your mother.
Fuck your love. The Syrians will rape your family. If I saw you, I would rape you to death. You'll be raped by the Volusian group. I hope your mother will not be racist when she is raped.
I'm going to bum your nan alive then dead her again. And the threats of rape, all of these threats of rape, imagine being these children, imagine being a 15 year old child living in Huddersfield with your little sisters. Muslim men are jailed in the biggest scandal in the history of our country for mass rapes in that town. And then you're receiving and you're reading these messages. You're going to die, you're going to fucking die, we're going to strangle your mum, your dad, your friends.
I'll kill your whole family. I can't wait to find you so I can slit your throat. You're the person who should be killed in those ISIS videos. You, your parents and your whole family have to be burned. Do heaven a favor of fucking off yourself.
Looking at you makes me want to commit suicide. Go commit suicide your your oxygen thief. Jump off a bridge bro. Do humans a favor and kill yourself. We don't want you and you don't belong in this world.
Again, imagine being that child reading them. Piers. Is that severe enough for you? This is a mental health record for Bailey McLaren. Bailey was referred to Luton CAMS by Luton and Dunstable Psychiatry Liaison on the 31st December 2018.
Reason patient involved in incident in Huddersfield and has been relocated to Luton with family. Patient unable to cope with not returning home and has taken an overdose. So this lie, this narrative, this agenda which comes before anything else by the politicians, by the media that was pumped. This child, it doesn't matter. His life didn't matter.
You know if he killed himself, no one would have cared. We wouldn't have heard condemnation from any of the politicians or from any of the media. No one cared. Because everyone from start to finish in this story is collateral damage so long as they have the narrative. And peers, you have a son, you have children.
Demanding severe retribution against a child for a school playground dispute is unforgivable. You sit there and you preach. You preach against us. You make your accusations against me. Never have I labelled Muslim children as vermin.
Never have I demanded my followers to commit severe retribution against anybody. And this is what the media, the politicians, and the celebrities created, aided and abetted by the left wing activism and the selective indignation of Islam. Hypocrites out there might say, who cares? That's what he deserved, right? Imagine for one moment if I had incited violence against young Muslim lad in the reversal of this situation.
And you see, in a district where a generation of young girls have been raped, these threats are far from empty. What do you think, if you were working in the school at that time, what do you think what the media done?
Speaker 5: I think the media fucking blew out of fucking proportion of what the fucking world body got off.
Speaker 0: I know. But in the media run that Jamal was being bullied,
Speaker 5: like You see, he used to complain that he used to be bullied. There was a there was another, I think, Kirklees Kirklees guy that came that Jamal that Jamal said somebody bought a knife or something? I think that that be that be that that should be on record. Yeah. Yeah.
I don't think when we we we we have to get I think it were a lot of bollocks.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm gathering that by reading the school records. They made accusations and then when they're investigated.
Speaker 5: Yeah. And there were a lot of bollocks. It lied.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Now ITV, Piers Morgan. You used your platform to incite hatred of a young child. No time for facts or the inconvenient truth. Surely you must have known the truth because within a few hours of the story breaking, I was receiving dozens of messages from parents, pupils and staff saying there was much more to the story than met the eye.
So I did what any journalist could have done, should have done. I asked questions. Were you just being lazy? Was it willful blindness? Or are you just incompetent peers?
And the BBC's Jeremy Vine, to you personally, was it clinical cowardice? After all, you didn't reveal the white boy's name. You just told everyone where to find it on Twitter. Were you afraid of being sued? Although it wouldn't have been the BBC licence fee payers picking up your legal bills, would it?
Or was this your Pontius Pilate moment? Condemning a child whilst washing your hands of any responsibility? Because that's what you did and you didn't seek the truth either. Piers, Jeremy, your lazy inept reporting was not without consequence as we will see. You incited hatred, you succeeded.
And that's contempt. Your actions, not Bailey's, led to Bailey and his family being driven from their home in the middle of the night. Like the very refugees you claim you care about. The hate you incited was off the scale. Then when machetes had arrived at the school, gangs were roaming the streets looking for bait.
West Yorkshire police told Bailey's mum that terrorism threat had been raised to writ. They had intelligence of people coming from Bradford to get Bailey and his family. Rather than deal with the threat, they moved Bailey and his family to a place of safety. So whilst one child had the support of the whole country, had the support of the prime minister, Sajid Javid, the local football club. Everyone rallying behind this child, £160,000 donated to him.
The other child in this incident, his family were driven from their home. Fret. Groups of men looking for him, ready to commit violence against him. And the police the police stopped their mom. So the police took the family.
The police went and got the family to get them out of their house through imminent danger, and they were taking them to relocate them here. Let's have a look. The night in. This is the accommodation that Bailey's mother with 2 9 year old sisters and children were being relocated to. This one star hotel where rooms are rented by the hour next door to a brothel.
The imam who brought a mob of men up to the school, he has 3 mosques within a stone's throw of where we're standing now. Bailey's mother, through her sense, looked up this hotel, saw it was owned by Muslims, read this read the reviews that it's a prostitute racket drug hole, and got out of the police meat wagon with her children to take them to safety herself. But this is where Kirklees Council were housing those children and that family. This is the most Muslim populated area of Leeds. That family were taken to so called safety, yeah, Surrounded by mosques in what is a Muslim ghetto.
Yeah? Which is why I'm getting bibbed. I'm gonna get some cause a scene now. We went to see from neighbors what it was like at the time of the incident.
Speaker 16: I think it was a a BMW
Speaker 15: the fire down the house.
Speaker 1: God. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: So it was
Speaker 16: it was meant to shoot,
Speaker 5: the 7
Speaker 0: To shoot the mum?
Speaker 16: The mum. The 7 2, to the it's
Speaker 0: Well, they come outside and under there. It's shouting and screaming. Shout and screaming.
Speaker 10: Well, I
Speaker 3: saw the video because the neighbor had shared it. And then I saw in the Yorkshire live, them making Bailey out to be really horrible, and that Jamal was a poor little victim, and it it wound me up. So I commented on it. The victim wasn't a victim. He hit me in the back with a hockey stick.
And then within the space of 2 hours, I had about 250 comments saying that I was lying, that I must have been excluded from the school because I'm a liar. Just horrible comments like that. None of them believe in me.
Speaker 0: And did you take this did you take the comment down?
Speaker 3: Yeah. I didn't want to, but my mom was worried for repercussions, so she asked me to take it down so I did.
Speaker 0: This is the area that Kirklees Council thought it was the right place to send a child and his family, who were wanted at the time, the main imam outside their school with mobs of Muslim men looking for them, and this is where they decided to send them. They basically dropped them in their backyard. That's what they were doing. This is the hotel. This is, I believe, a 4 star hotel.
It's totally full of illegal immigrants. This is across the country. So the point to make is that illegal immigrants come here, young fine age men, not families, not children, and this is where council would help them. Let's have a look. Hello, boys.
Hello.
Speaker 5: How are you doing?
Speaker 0: Can I do you mind if I ask, what what country are you from, though?
Speaker 1: I I do not know speak English.
Speaker 0: You do speak English. I do. This is what
Speaker 13: country are you from? Mine
Speaker 0: yeah. Iran? Yeah. Iran. Okay.
Speaker 13: Yeah. Iran.
Speaker 0: Kurdistan. Iran. Okay. Nice call, man. I'm just seeing.
Is the hotel full? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Full.
Enjoying it here? Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 13: Nice hotel. Nice food.
Speaker 0: Nice hotel. Nice food?
Speaker 13: Yeah. Healthy food.
Speaker 0: Healthy food. It looks like a nice hotel. Yeah. How many people are in here?
Speaker 13: I think there's 200.
Speaker 0: 200? Lots of children?
Speaker 13: So my iPhone, I think it has a little children.
Speaker 0: No children?
Speaker 13: Oh, my mom's children. No.
Speaker 0: Not many children. But it's a nice hotel.
Speaker 13: Nice hotel.
Speaker 0: Nice hotel. It is a nice hotel. And if if you look at if you look at where the other family were being housed in Beeston and you compare it to this 4 star 4 star hotel, nice food as our friend says.
Speaker 1: Healthy food.
Speaker 0: Healthy food.
Speaker 11: Yeah. Alright.
Speaker 0: Hello, bro. Hi. How you doing?
Speaker 1: Hey. Do you want to come back in?
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're off now, mate. We're only we're only we're only we're done now.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 11: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Do you know what they have in here? They have a full time doctor and nurses. Full time, stationed in there.
Speaker 13: In, buddy.
Speaker 0: Full time. So you know when you come my dad tried to get a doctor's appointment earlier. Couldn't get one. Full time. Full time.
Full time.
Speaker 1: You're very bad.
Speaker 0: The food's bad? Yeah. The food's bad? Yeah. Is it free?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's free.
Speaker 5: They called our school. Soon as the media media and all that died, they sent in chief inspectors chief inspectors of fucking off state. We knew they're gonna fail and every fucking thing they can think of.
Speaker 1: I have goofiness, There's a lot more changes. All of that and yesterday. And, you know, they're only in the bank, but it was never picked up.
Speaker 0: Apart from my reporting, there was not a single media statement given the other side of this story. The staff knew. Other pupils knew. They could've exposed the lie. Why didn't they?
Speaker 1: The incident I always quote the incident. Yeah. The incident has reoccurred. It's come to my door. They said you can't talk about it because you've got an undistclosure agreement.
They're not satisfactory. So that was the reason they triggered it.
Speaker 0: They were even not free to tell you the truth or they were terrified of the consequences. And that's for so called journalists. Some can't find the truth, some won't tell the truth, and some they're afraid of the truth. But me, as a journalist, it's my job to present you the truth.
Speaker 1: If you want my honest opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shoot that school. Get up there and get rid of this.
Speaker 0: You see, when the media and politicians decide to kill a story, when they decide to hide the truth from you, they'll do whatever it takes. They shut down the school. It's gone. Everyone lost their jobs. You see, once this Live Our Racist attack had gone global, the truth would never be allowed to come out.
The real truth, that a young Syrian refugee was struggling to fit into his new environment was problematic. His allegedly abusive and violent conduct towards teachers and children was allowed to run unchecked. Why? Did the school authorities turn a blind eye rather than be accused of victimizing the boy, of being racist towards him? They stayed silent.
The truth may have triggered accusations of racism or sparked discussion about immigration policies. The challenges of achieving the successful integration of migrants we welcome into United Kingdom, and the need to take those challenges seriously. You see, Jamal was one of 20,000 Syrian refugees who come to the UK as part of the United Nations resettlement program. The government could not allow their policies to be examined and the consequences and their incompetence to be exposed. And if you don't think the government is incompetent, you ain't been paying attention to anything.
Priti Patel's been talking tough, really tough on controlling our borders for years. And yet we have boatloads of illegal economic migrants being escorted across the English Channel and put into these luxury accommodation at your expense. This ineptitude does nothing for the refugees who come here legally, who we welcome into England, refugees who are trying to integrate and make a new life here. And who was the community's rage directed at? All Syrian refugees.
That's who. When in fact, there are many families of Syrian refugees in the area, we're told, all of them delightful, working hard to settle and integrate into the country they can now call home. I spoke to multiple refugee families. In the school, Gremlin, my children. No.
Any Gremlin. No problems with your children? No. That's it. And you've had a you've had a good experience in the school?
Speaker 10: I used to have 2 friends and they don't Bali and they don't care where from country I can't move anything.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 10: And when I spoke English, like, I was we was about 1 month we've been in here, and I used to not speak English very much. So they used to tell me how to speak all that thing. And now I'm in year 8, and I know how to speak English. And I made more friends, and now I am fine.
Speaker 0: And you're fine? And then no problems?
Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules.
Speaker 0: Who told Jamal to go on camera and say this? Who arranged the media tour? Who encouraged him to take legal action? He was originally going to sue the school for not looking after him and then decided to sue me instead. Who told him to put this in his statement to the High Court?
You see, Jamal doesn't like to break the school rules. Here's the problem. This is his behavior record. Almost a 100 codes for bad behavior. Truancy, verbal abuse to teachers, physical violence towards pupils, and lying.
Yeah, there's plenty for lying. You see, I haven't got all of Jamal's school records. Large sections of documents I was given were blacked out. We tried to get access but we weren't allowed. And the lawyers wrote to the court to explain they had misplaced documentation.
And finally, as you can hear, the lawyers decided what they were gonna allow me to see. Whilst I was preparing my defense, Jamal's lawyers decided what I could see. And this global news story wasn't an accident. It was all carefully planned. You see, the day before the video went viral, a GoFundMe page was set up for Jamal and the video went viral the day after a criminal record check come back on Jamal.
Why would his lawyers do a criminal record check? Well, they had to make sure this was financially beneficial exercise. Wasn't going to be derailed by an unhelpful pass. 15 Rold Jamal, his record was clean by the way. Mohammed Akanji, the jihadist lawyer of choice, was immediately on the global media blitz.
Speaker 19: Listen. I'm very conned to himself. I'm after him for my own reason.
Speaker 8: Right. Okay. Nothing sinister though, is it?
Speaker 19: Oh, fuck. No. No. Journalistic. Oh, journalistic.
Well, that's good.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No.
Speaker 19: No. Fucking totally journalistic. I wanna get all the background on him. You reckon he Yeah. You reckon he was a member of that?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Al and Midrgharun are a prescribed terrorist organization. Almost 60% of terrorists in British prisons are ex members of this organization. They kill. They murder.
They slaughter. That is the organization that Mohammed Khanji and his brother were allegedly, according to this, top mainstream Muslim British journalist who are members of it. How does a Syrian lad find himself working with the jihadist lawyer of choice before this video even went out? Before anyone has seen this viral video. Within 2 weeks, the lawyers have been made the beneficiaries of the GoFundMe page of £160,000.
A plan to sue the school? That's put on hold. And a plan to sue, moi, for libel was launched. What riches had these lawyers promised Jamal and his family? School records were edited.
Migration Yorkshire clamored to make this playground fight about race and hate. They contacted the Home Office as soon as they heard about this playground fight. Yeah. The home office, a playground scuffle. Why are they contacting the home office instantly?
Someone went further. You see, we had this school incident report analyzed by a graphologist. Someone who analyzes handwriting. It appears to show that a second person with very different handwriting doctored the report to allege that Bailey had threatened to stab Jamal. Even though all the witness reports mentioned there was only one teacher there, so only one teacher could have done an instant report.
So, with the careful planning, the jihadist favorite lawyer and the enthusiastic support of some useful idiots, it was possible for the lies to go round the world twice before the truth had had a chance to put his pants on. I now need to mention other repercussions of what happened in Ormondbury. I was being sued for reporting the things that were said to me about Jamau. I had to defend myself. The judges already already ruled that I was not allowed to argue.
It was in the public's interest for people to hear a different perspective of Jamal. I had to prove that the information reported to me was true. That's not the kind of burden placed on Piers Morgan or Jeremy Vine. Piers can describe Bailey as vermin without being held to account. And who is behind propagating this deception and the lawsuit against me?
You see, this is where we get to meet the most sinister part of the unholy alliance. All sorts of people are helping out, but leading the posse from the front is the jihadist lawyer of choice. He represented Shamina Begman, you know the jihadi terrorist that's out in Syria. He represented, I think, Michael Adeballajo, Lee Rigby's killer. I think he's even had to change his name because he's got such a terrible track record.
So this is the lawyer who's suing me and who the media celebrated that he had served me papers even though I wasn't in the country. If you're pillaged, if you've plundered, if you've raped and you're beheaded, and you say you've done it in the name of Islam, well these are the lawyers for you. The lawyers who stepped forward for ISIS by Shmina Begum, who've been fighting to get her back into our country. Who defended Michael Adeballaju who beheaded Lee Rigby. This is Mohammed Akanji and his colleague, Faruk Bajwa, who's been banned from claiming legal aid.
Yeah. Banned from claiming legal aid for putting in fraudulent expense claims. Let me rewind a bit. Let's go back a few weeks. There's an important piece of background information to this.
Speaker 15: Don't know the full ins and outs of it, but, basically, to inform the group call themselves Antifa UK. Yeah. Over there? Yep. To be honest, I kind of haven't, and Antifa Dundee.
The base he says are planning to help possibly kill Tommy Robinson, because they know where he lives and want to silence him. They've got their hands on it says they've got hands hands on to make a 40 sevens, make ketchup bombs and stuff. And allegedly, instead, wherever the foot, these petrol bonds through your door when he sleeps. They say they're also friends with a few MPs.
Speaker 0: Now at the heightened tensions with multiple osmond warnings, they now take back the radar phone, the one option we have to go direct to the police, and they are removing it at this current moment.
Speaker 1: Where are you from? I'm from
Speaker 0: So, look, what did you just say, basically, the the the radar phone or whatever it is? Yes. Yes. The phone, the emergency phone that you Will will be taking that back. You'll be taking that back.
Yeah. But those those phones are They're used for a aren't even for real. Like, so so when there's a heightened threat and people have come to the house and the address has been put out where my kids are, you're then gonna take the panic phone back. It's Christmas 2018. The police come to my family's home to tell me that people in Antifa, file a violent and extremist organisation, are planning to kill me and my family.
See who were the first to comment on this video? Well, Mohammed Akanji of Farooq Bazrunko, of course, the jihadists lawyers of choice, but also Mike Stoodsbury, an independent journalist, an Antifa activist. So the jihadist lawyers knew Antifa were planning to kill me, then actually commented on the video of the Ozmen warning. You see, what happened next is interesting, although not interesting to the solicitors regulation authority or the law society. The people who should be interested in the integrity of our lawyers.
Speaker 16: It will be live streamed. I'm not in charge of the
Speaker 4: filming or anything like that.
Speaker 16: That's, down to the
Speaker 4: the guys over here.
Speaker 16: And you literally know we wanted to do this, so we thought, what mug can we probably do with a creep for this?
Speaker 0: So 2 lawyers who know Antifa are planning to kill me seek out an Antifa extremist, hire him for one day, just one day, and send him to live stream the servant of papers to my home, my family's home. Papers which had already been served by the way, with a gang. When my wife and children were there, when they knew I was abroad, lawyers commissioned the Antifa Extremist to broadcast my home address in order, as they put it, to cause a spectacle.
Speaker 18: The law firm or the lawyer who has been, you know, sort of taking the lead on the Tommy case wanted to make sure, doubly sure that that, a, Tommy got the, the the letter. It actually went out 2 2 two different ways, and he wanted to make a bit of a spectacle out of it. This this is all very they're very amusing.
Speaker 0: A group supported by Mike Stitchbury came to the home that my wife and children were in on a Sunday afternoon when I wasn't even in the country. So let's have a look at Mike Stitchbury, who calls himself a journalist, who promoted this event, who shared it and encouraged it, who found it amusing that my wife was so scared she had to ring the police. My wife has been sat down and told in her home that Antifa are planning to kill her. They're planning to kill our family and harm our family. She's been told that she may get acid in her face.
Well, how do you think she felt on a Sunday afternoon whilst my children are playing outside on their bikes? To be told that Antifa were on their way to our home. Let's have a look at Mike Stuxbury, the man that sent them. Here he is self admitting that he is part of Antifa. Here he is promoting violence against his opposition.
Punch them, punch them, punch them. Here he is hoping that buses full of Antifa get shipped in to smash people's skulls in. Here he is calling for white genocide. Mike Stitchby is an extremist. He's a far left extremist who currently is playing a victim.
He encouraged people to come and he sent people and was part of an organization that communicated together, to send people to the home where my wife and children were when I wasn't there. He even crowdfunded to support them in their action.
Speaker 18: He, you know, he was looking at various people and eventually he sort of came on to Dick Coughlin. Dick Coughlin? I can't say it properly. Who is a a a YouTuber who has made videos about Tommy for, god, almost 10 years, I think, who's a who's a real critic. He's a I don't know if you've checked him out, but he's a he's a funny guy.
Speaker 5: Check out. Yeah.
Speaker 18: He's, sort of, you know, got red hair, x he calls you know, he's he's an ex crackhead, basically.
Speaker 0: And who is this antique extremist hired to come to my kids' home? Keep watching. I went up to where and they said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it.
And later that night, the Antifa Extremists hired by their lawyers had a message for me and my children.
Speaker 16: And on that note, see,
Speaker 0: on that on the happy note.
Speaker 6: Oh, by the way, Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate.
Speaker 0: So look at the man that they sent. The man that you can see, the Muslim lawyer, handed privileged documentation giving this man my children's home address. That's what he's done. Fully aware of the serious danger my family are in, and he hands them my children's address. They then come to my children's home, my wife gets a phone call, my children run off the drive, they lock themselves in the house, they ring emergency, the emergency 999 call for the police to come, they press panic buttons, they need support because Antifa are coming.
They came, they told the Muslim lawyer, he's fully aware they're coming to live stream where my family are. They live stream and dox the name of the road. They dox the door number. I went up to where and I'm and I said, right. We'll take that from him.
We'll make sure he gets it. The man's specifically chosen. He was chosen. He says in his own video.
Speaker 16: The lawyer in this case was a guy called Mohammed Sunimi Akundra who works for a solicitors in London called, I shit you not, Farooq Bajwa and Co, solicitors of London. I get asked by this guy that, they've decided that they're going to Tommy Robinson is going to be served legal papers, so he can be sued by this family. And they asked, me, do I want to be the one to go along to serve legal documents?
Speaker 0: Let's have a look at who Dick Coughlin is. Let's have a look at some of the things he said. Here he is promoting hatred against black people. Serious, this is a crime. The comments he makes are a crime.
Here he is promoting hatred against Pakistanis. Here he is singing a song promoting anti semitism, singing a song about lampshades being made out of Jewish people's skin from the hollow. Yeah. 3rd black, 3rd black, you're a good killer kite. We're white, far right, and we're gonna have a fight.
We're in the A self confessed racist anti semitic crackhead was sent to my children's property. He talked about raping my wife in her skull socket. He talked about my children being fed for a meat winder. He talked about burning my house down and whilst masturbating with my family in it. Now other than to terrorize my wife and children, why would any sane person do this?
It worked, okay. Tipped off by a friend who saw the gang on livestream approaching, my ex wife hit the panic button and barricaded herself and our children in a bedroom. The police thankfully responded in time. And these are exactly the same tactics being used against the unbelievably courageous children in Ombre. Threats of violence and rape against children who are willing to stand with me in defence of the truth at the High Court of London.
The video release, media, GoFundMe, Antifa, it all happened at the same time. It was coordinated, and it was about hate and making money. And how that far left activist, who appears to be an antisemitic, Jew hating, black hating racist, came to my home with his gang and threatened to kill my children. These lawyers, the mainstream media, they don't care about refugees. They don't care about Jamelle.
They don't care about the truth. Say that bloke who made the video saying
Speaker 1: he's gonna kill the kids. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Can you if you didn't do it, I know 100% give a statement. I know. I was there.
Speaker 5: Okay. Give a
Speaker 0: statement about that. She complained about it. She contacted Paul, remember, it would have been the liaison officer at the time, to Okay. Ask if he was arrested. I found out his address, and I gave you all the information for him.
So even now Right. Say now, looking at that, can he be arrested now then?
Speaker 15: I don't know what happened with
Speaker 20: the previous report because when we search on our system that we currently use
Speaker 0: You probably got very good.
Speaker 20: See any crime report that was linked to it.
Speaker 0: You see, the next day, knowing I've been provoked with threats against my ex wife and my children, no doubt thinking they would catch me conspiring to commit violence and lock me up on a conspiracy charge. Here, outside my ex wife's house, men in a car that has never been registered, check the registration plate. So presumably from the security services, we've listing devices recording what's being said in my home. The involvement of the security services may explain why Dick Coughlin, the man who publicly threatened to murder my children, has never even been spoken to or arrested despite my wife's complaints. What are you doing?
Is there any reason the back of your glove? There's no
Speaker 5: one in the back of your glove.
Speaker 0: So what are you doing? We're not here. Anything to do with you. What are you doing now? Well, who what do you think we're doing?
I think you're starting to do me.
Speaker 15: No. No. It's a pissy.
Speaker 0: Who's this with? What are you doing? And there is someone in the back. I'm at
Speaker 11: Can you
Speaker 1: tell me what you're doing now?
Speaker 0: Because essentially, I've got threats against me. I'm not. Yeah? So what are you doing? I don't know what you're doing, bro.
That's all everyone knows what you're doing. I've got police officers sat with a recording in a recording van. In the back of this van is a recording station. I'm not standing. You're not going.
No. Because I no. Because what yous are doing I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing.
They're sat in the back of their van. This is recording devices. The whole of this back thing because he just opened up when I got him out. The whole of this back thing is recording where they're pointing it because they what this is has been a setup. These people are set these police officers are setting me
Speaker 1: up.
Speaker 0: They're setting me up. It's a setup. They're setting me up by sending people to my house because they think I'm gonna react and do something, and they're recording it with listening devices. We checked the vehicle registration plate outside the house on the government website and there's no such vehicle. Let's not forget the politicians are fearless leaders.
It was only when I went alone to the home of self declared journalist, Mike Stuchby, to ask him why he had done what he had and why he thought it was funny to intimidate my children. Some of you may some of you may have seen that people have been outside my home. Timberland, my family. The difference is when they come to my home, 5 men come to my home. I'm on my own.
I've had to move my children who are scared and upset. And people encouraged people to participate in coming to my address. One of those such people
Speaker 13: who
Speaker 0: It was only then that the fearless then deputy leader of the Labour Party, Tom Watson, steps forwards. Ignoring reality completely.
Speaker 21: Every major social media platform other than YouTube has taken down Steven Yaxley Lennon's profile because of his hateful conduct. Late on Monday night, Yaxley Lennon turned up at a journalist home banging on the doors and windows demanding to be let in. And after being escorted away by the police, he returned at 5 AM and continued his intimidation. The incident was live streamed. He later warned journalists in a YouTube video to expect a knock at the door.
Does the secretary of state think that is right that YouTube and the parent company Alphabet continues to give this man a platform, sir?
Speaker 0: It'd be funny, you know, if it wasn't so insidious. The hardly honorable mister Watson totally misrepresented what happened, and from behind his shield of parliamentary privilege, bravely declared but I've been terrorizing a journalist. Journalist. Stokesbury's an antifa activist who incites violence and wants to kill white people. Terrorizing.
Was I terrorizing? Mister Watson bravely demanded that I'd be removed from YouTube. YouTube had now had only recently confirmed that none, not one of my videos had broken any of their stringent guidelines. And my videos hadn't broken any laws. It was clear I hadn't harassed anyone, certainly not Mike Stutchbury, if indeed he is a journalist.
But none of that mattered. My wife and children left their family home that night. They never went back. Perhaps having their lives endangered by their jihadist lawyers. See my wife started legal action against Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra's firm.
But Mo and Co, Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra, see they weren't so keen on facing the law as they were on abusing the law to persecute others for financial and ideological reasons. On the 31st March 2019, they promptly collapsed their law firm. They'd never be involved in the case. That's what they said. And doctor Farooq Basra, well he's no longer gonna be a lawyer.
He'd been living in Pakistan. That's it. That's what they said. That's how easy it was for Mo and Co to escape justice. Interestingly, they're still signing documents on the case on the 6th June, months after saying they're not involved.
Several other law firms have reported them to the Law Society, the body that is supposed to make sure lawyers behave ethically. Nothing's been done. I wonder why. In fact, all the lawyers working at Fruit Basement and Co just moved across to a new law firm called Burlington's. And guess what?
Yeah. Burlington's took on Jamelle's case against me. FruitBazwa now works for Burlington's. FruitBazwa's son now works for Burlington's. Fruit Basra is Burlington's GDPR expert.
Pretty ironic, no? Fruit Basra and Co leaked my children's address to an antifa activist to put it online for everyone. And if we've been stupid enough to expect more ethical behaviour from Birlingtons than from Faruk Bajwa and Mohammed Akanji, well, we'd have been disappointed. I just really, which I've been trying to do, I need all of the disclosure, which I haven't had. I haven't had a full disclosure of his school records.
Speaker 12: Therefore, to make sure, that we have it, that that some documents haven't been lost in the transfer of the bathroom through Bourgeois to to Burlington's, we have done another subject access request to the council for
Speaker 0: July. And how long would that and how long would the council take for that?
Speaker 12: I I don't know. I I don't think they gave us time frame, did they,
Speaker 11: Luke? No. No.
Speaker 15: They didn't, unfortunately. So you're asking
Speaker 0: so what what you're saying is you believe there may be things that I that I haven't been disclosed. You don't know how long they're gonna take, but you won't agree to an adjournment?
Speaker 12: No. No. Our position is that we're not agreeing to an adjournment. Those are my instructions.
Speaker 0: Because my my my concern and serious concern is the safety of the witnesses. And and it's a genuine and and if you I don't believe for 1 minute that Mohammed al Khemji or Farooq Basra give a shit about any of this or Jamelle. Yeah. I I generally don't think they do. And this is I'm
Speaker 12: just gonna say Farooq Bajwa and Mohammed Dukunji have nothing to do with this case. This is my case.
Speaker 0: How how how come how come how come then
Speaker 12: to anybody from Fruit Bajwa
Speaker 0: How come then Fruit Bajwa
Speaker 12: have Burlington started with me.
Speaker 0: How come Fritbajwa signed a form 3 months after he left then to do this case?
Speaker 12: It's absolute it was, if if that was the case, it was before I gave the undertaking, and he wasn't involved in this case before.
Speaker 0: He signed a he signed a form dated June in June. He signed a form, and the date on that form that he signed is June. He left this case in March, apparently. How come?
Speaker 12: Well, I I I if you explanation as to why. I'm not quite sure what the formula is about.
Speaker 0: No. You'll see it you'll see it you'll see it on my documentary. Okay so when you when you send me what you decide is relevant yeah, how am I going to know what you've cut out?
Speaker 15: Well I suppose you wouldn't.
Speaker 0: I wouldn't. Does that seem fair? If the info if the if the information is not relevant, then what harm could it do in me hacking it?
Speaker 15: But it's not about harm Stephen, it's about privacy.
Speaker 0: For the last for the last 3 days, since I gave you, since you received videos so that you become aware that I have video evidence that's going to prove my case, since that point my ex wife and my children for the last 2 days have had police at their house because they've been receiving threats. On top of that pictures of my ex wife have been put online by the same people who were in bed with Mohammed Okanji. Then 2 days ago Mohammed Okanji doxxed my mother and father's house. Last night, that house at 1 o'clock in the morning was smashed to pieces with bricks through the windows, yeah? This is all going on in the background of it.
I've been trying to get my stuff ready, but just so you're aware of what's going on as to why I don't trust the words you say. When you have Farouk Basra's son working for your, working for your company and Farooq Basra is the man that sent people to threaten to kill my children, I'm wondering why in the last 48 hours or last 72 hours, since I disclosed information to you, Why why my family and loved ones have come under persecuted harm? Of which is all detailed with police records and video footage of everything that's been going on. So I'm super concerned and don't trust you or your party to decide what's relevant in this case. I don't trust you.
So where, how, if this should be fair trial about getting out the truth, if that's what you're working for, you need to give me your disclosure. Instead of reviewing it and taking bits out, which is what you've already done with the school records. You'll say, because I know that's not the full school records, so and you've covered up things which, and Luke, Francesca told me, I have a recording of her telling me, that your, that Burlington's did not retract anything, redact anything, yet in court you had to admit you did. I've got the recording of that telling you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you.
Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. And then in court you sit and admit that you have been redacting things. So, forgive me. It's just lie after lie. This is Burlington's lawyers losing documents that they're supposed to send to me and deleting things that they don't want me to see?
Misplaced. How do you misplace documents that were electronically filed on their case management system through Basra and Co, then passed over to Berlin's? All of this is because they're sharing it. And all of this is to put pressure on me in the weeks before it. And all this, and this is a kanji, I guarantee you this is a kanji, a kanji working with resistant hay.
The the account that's put put it on is is resisting hate, yeah? Resistant hate who a country hires with Dick Coughlin to send to the house before. They're like his little minis. So now he knows that it's coming, it's going to land on his lap. The whole lie that they've told, and this is the actions they use.
They can't play the man so they play the kids and the family. You don't need to be scared, Sanya, because, they're doing this
Speaker 10: you guys just told me he's a good boy.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I know, babe. But they're purposely just doing that. But when they're doing this, they're just doing this to try and get cause me shit and make you worry. So I know it's easier said, but you don't need to worry.
Yeah? They're doing this so they're doing this so that I don't beat them in court. That's why they're doing this. Yeah? The mad thing is the whole time this goes on, the media and all of the, we're the bad guys.
That we've been on. But like I'm the one persecuting people or targeting them. And they're such cowards. They're such cowards, man. I just got a phone call, and they said goodbye.
I'm so scared. I've told the police, but I'm so scared.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Hello?
Speaker 0: Jenna, who's just wrong with Spencer?
Speaker 10: We don't know at the minute.
Speaker 11: What are
Speaker 0: the police then?
Speaker 10: I'm just making a statement.
Speaker 0: Okay. But just quickly, what are they what are they are they getting that account? Let's put a picture of you online. How who's who showed you that picture, Jenna?
Speaker 10: It's on Twitter. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Who saw it?
Speaker 10: I saw it myself.
Speaker 0: You saw it yourself. Okay. Yeah. Are they gonna are the police sorting out to get rid of it?
Speaker 10: Yeah, they've taken the address of the Twitter person to put it out.
Speaker 0: If you can say I give them 50 addresses of people who have done exactly this over the years, including the redhead man who what about the redhead bloke who friends come to kids? What do they say about that?
Speaker 10: Well nothing really.
Speaker 0: No? It's a crime. Do you know what I mean? If I make if I make a video threatening to kill some kids, I'll be arrested. So that the point where you need to ask them specifically and say to them you made a complaint, someone threatened to murder your children, you had to leave your home yeah, Those threats have now followed you to where you're now living.
Yeah. And they're coming from the same people, the same organizations, the same people they done fuck all about last time. They didn't lick them. They didn't speak to them. They didn't.
The solicitor is still acting with impunity, doing it to my mom and dad yesterday. See, you need to specifically ask them, then I want our answer, Adam. When you made a complaint against Richard Coughlin, Dick Coughlin last year, why have they not done anything? And give us and get you a follow-up and an answer as to why they haven't
Speaker 15: done anything, if you can.
Speaker 11: Just get
Speaker 12: it up. You've got time?
Speaker 0: I mean, the kids are right. Am I right that you managed to track the number? Yes. So you know who made those phone calls to her and the
Speaker 14: We know where the number it came from
Speaker 5: Yep.
Speaker 14: And who who that phone was registered to. So that's all obviously, we cannot prove well, I I at that time, I wasn't able to prove who. I only could say where the number came from.
Speaker 0: As in as in as in whose phone is?
Speaker 14: Who the phone is registered to.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because because, obviously, for me, this was this was threatening phone calls a week before a high court trial trying to prevent the court trying to prevent the court to justice. How come no one's been arrested?
Speaker 14: I can't see any again on the crime report.
Speaker 0: If I send you evidence, which I'm going to anyway because it's all going to the judge, if I send you evidence of Mohammed Akanji doxing my mum and dad's address, if I send you evidence of criminal damage and attacks in the middle of the night at an old pensioner's old pensioner's home, and I show you evidence of pictures of my wife being put on, ex wife being put online, and my son. They've hung my 11 year old son's phone. The police were all involved. They've been threatening my 11 year old son. Yeah?
This is what's going on. If I send you evidence of that, do you think you'll support an anonymity order to protect the children in this case?
Speaker 15: Steven, I I I can't answer that because I don't have instructions to answer that. I don't have conduct of the matter. But what I can clarify for you is some of the issues that I can give answers on. One of those of which I heard you made reference to, Farooq's son working. He is not involved in the case in any way at all, has no access to any files whatsoever.
Speaker 0: You've heard how Luke hack here. He couldn't explain why they were adapting and deleting information from documents before handing them over to me. Information I should have been given. He couldn't answer the simple question, who decides what's relevant? Unfortunately, in terms of integrity, bowlands don't appear to be any better than Fruit Bajwa and Mohammed al Kanchi.
You see, I was told he'd violently attacked a girl. I was told he'd attack someone as part of a gang. And I was told he'd threaten to stab someone. In fact, Jamal would violently attack more than 1 girl and we presented the evidence to the court, including the testimony of courageous children who came to court. These children weren't Tommy Robinson fans, but they came to the high court to speak the truth.
So let me just look at one of the pupils that come to court and testified. This young girl wasn't a supporter of mine, didn't support my politics, but she still came to court and testified. Let me have a look at her school record and read what her teacher says about her. Charlie is a very mature and hardworking member of the form. She has been an absolute pleasure to have in the form.
She has represented the form in the school council and in various events across the school throughout the school year. She represents all that is positive and exciting about studying studying at Almunbury. Charlie is now currently studying law at university. Why would this girl lie, randomly lie, before I was involved? Why would she then travel to the high court of London and commit perjury?
Speaker 11: Because
Speaker 0: that is what the judge has found, that she's made it all up. And Jamal, the Syrian refugee, the one with multiple lies in his school records and behavioral discipline reads everywhere, well, he was telling the truth. That is what he found in this case. Why would a mother post images and send me those images of her daughter being black and blue? Why?
For what reason? Why would the staff lie? Why would the head teacher lie? Why would every single person who was recorded covertly lie about what Jamal was like. 12 different people lying about what Jamal was like.
Why? See, the judge has really helped us out here. The judge says people can lie for reasons that make no sense. Sometimes for no reason at all. He could not readily identify any explanation for why some of these people were prepared to do so and lie.
He concludes the alleged assaults, they never happened at all. Despite Jamal's school record, which you've seen, the judge states the Cayman's record is overwhelmingly positive. He acknowledged Jamal has a record of lying, but decides on this occasion, it is Jamal who's telling the truth and everyone else, everyone else is lying. Really? We waited 10 weeks for this?
That's your conclusion? That's the logic from the highest liable judge in our land? There was no jury. That's right. There's no jury.
All of these people were lying, But Jamal, he was telling the truth. Jamal, who could only find his dad Jihad to speak for him. Not a single teacher. Not a classmate, not a friend, not a neighbor, or a support worker came to court to support Jamal's version of defense. Jamal, who said he only broke the rules a few times at school and even then it weren't his fault.
His school records suggest something very different. I wanna be clear and fair to Jamal. He denies every accusation against him, completely and utterly. On the day the 5 courageous children appeared in the dock, giving testimony against Jamal. Jamal didn't even show up in court that day to face his accusers.
Neither did the press. The press actually left court when the witnesses stood up to give their evidence in my defense. It's alarming to think we have this kind of intellect at the top of our judiciary. The story of these 2 children is actually a story about free speech or the death of it. It's a story about how the mainstream media is more interested in pushing an agenda than giving you balance and truth.
How it continues despite Levenson to act with impunity. Is the media held to account for what they report? Have Pierce Morgan or Jeremy Vine been held to account? No. It's a story about how the the law is being manipulated and exploited by the far left and Islamists to destroy the lives of anyone who speaks out against the accepted so called progressive, so called liberal narrative.
Or about the poisonous influence of Islam's Sharia law in our society. Is the law fit for purpose? No. And it's a story about our government and judiciary's disdain for free speech and the truth, and the lengths that they will go to in order to silence dissent, especially with its new and increasing powers. Is our government being held accountable for its actions?
No. Is the judiciary independent of political influence? You've seen all the evidence. You decide. Whether you agree in my politics is irrelevant.
When dissent is crushed, free speech dies and governments move one step closer to tyranny. The lawyers know the truth. Even Jamal's father Jihad, he knows the truth about his son. They all knew the truth and were using Jamal to further their agenda, regardless of the consequences for Jamal. They continued to pursue the case, which incidentally, has caused my divorce and bankruptcy.
My ex wife had to choose between her marriage to me, and the safety of our children. I'm glad she chose our children. We're still best mates. You see, Jamal's lawyers told me very early on, if I apologized and paid them 50 grand, they'd drop their case. If you're watching this, you know the decision I made.
I might apologize for reporting what I was told, for what I believed to be true, for standing up for Bailey, a young lad unjustly vilified by pretty much everyone. But in silence and dissent, are the media and our government any different to the governments they criticize so much? China, Russia, Iran. Immigration, COVID, Brexit, if it doesn't fit the narrative, you will not hear the alternative view. And where else have we seen this?
Where else has the media, politicians, police, and social services hidden for truth for decades, fearful of being called racist, grooming gangs. That's where a cover up of such horrific cost to 1,000 of young girls in towns and cities across our country. And nowhere worse than under the stewardship of counselor Shabir Pandor's Kirklees Council. You see, hiding the truth doesn't protect communication. It does the total opposite.
It undermines trust in public institutions. It stokes resentment and conflict in our communities. Tragically, those who lead us don't seem to have the moral clarity or courage to speak the truth. They cause the division that they're trying to prevent. People ask me, was it worth it?
Yeah. It was worth it. The truth is always worth defending. I'm still here. If you were born in the United Kingdom, you've already won the lottery your life.
An inheritance from our parents and grandparents of freedom, equality under English law, and democracy. If we allow ourselves to be silenced, that inheritance is rendered worthless. What legacy will we leave for the children and grandchildren who come after us? None of us can afford to let free speech die. We cannot and we will not be silenced.
So you've seen. I'm being sent to jail. I'm being prosecuted for showing you the truth. Nothing else. I didn't lie.
Okay? They've lied, continually lied. Now for the attorney general to bring a charge against a member of the public for contempt to court, it has to be in the public interest. I say to the attorney general, this is not the police prosecuting. In fact, the claimant in this case is not asking me to to be prosecuted.
His lawyers are not asking me to be prosecuted. The Labour government's attorney general is the one attempting to send me to jail. Now for it to be in the public's interest you remember the public. You've just watched this expose. Is it in your interest to lock me up for 2 years?
How can it be? Let the government know. Let the attorney general know by signing the petition at www.truthontrial.co.uk to let them know you don't support the imprisonment of journalists for reporting facts to you, the British public. Who knows what the future now holds for me? The one thing that gives me a peace of mind if I'm in prison or if even if the worst happens is knowing that my family have stability and have security.
If you can support them during these times, the link is at www.helptommy.com. I really appreciate your support.
@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Please make sure you sign the petition to the new attorney general to put a STOP to my political prosecution. Go to http://truthontrial.co.uk
URBANSCOOP Email Marketing -
urbanscoop.activehosted.com
@Martin_Durkin - Martin Durkin 🇮🇱🏴
The British govt, I'm fairly certain, will ban this film as dangerous misinformation. Before it can, I'm reposting it. Please copy and share. https://t.co/xRZyoBkC9u
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video challenges the mainstream narrative of human-caused catastrophic global warming and explores the role of money and funding in shaping the climate change industry. It presents alternative viewpoints from scientists who argue that climate change is a natural occurrence influenced by factors such as solar activity and cosmic rays. The video questions the validity of claims about extreme weather events and melting ice caps, suggesting that the climate change narrative has been driven by financial interests. It calls for a more balanced and evidence-based approach to the issue. The video also discusses the impact of the climate crisis on society, highlighting the growth of the multitrillion dollar climate industry and the pressure faced by individuals who question or criticize the climate narrative. It argues that the climate alarm is not only an attack on science but also a means to increase government control and regulation. The video examines the impact of climate policies on developing countries and the skepticism and backlash from the public. It suggests that the climate alarm is driven by self-interest, snobbery, and a desire for power and control. Overall, the video calls for a critical examination of the climate change narrative and a more balanced approach to addressing the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you?
Speaker 1: This is the story of how an eccentric environmental scare grew into a powerful global industry.
Speaker 2: It's a wonderful business opportunity. Okay? You want climate, we'll give you climate.
Speaker 3: There's a huge amount of money involved. This is a huge big money scam.
Speaker 4: There are not just now 1,000,000,000, but there are 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars at stake.
Speaker 1: It's a story of self interest and big government funding.
Speaker 5: People like me, our careers depend on funding of climate research. This is what I've been doing just about my whole career. This is what the other climate researchers are doing with their whole career. They don't want this to end.
Speaker 6: If c02 isn't having the huge negative impacts that we claimed it was having originally, how are we going to stay in business?
Speaker 3: A lot of people's livelihoods depend on it. They're not gonna give that.
Speaker 1: This is a story of the corruption of science.
Speaker 7: There's no such thing as a climate happening on this planet now. It's there's no no evidence of 1.
Speaker 8: The climate alarm is nonsense. You know? It's it's a hoax. I've never liked hoax. I I think scam is a better word, but I'm willing to live with folks.
Speaker 1: It's a story about the bullying and intimidation of anyone who dares to challenge
Speaker 6: the climate alarm. To speak up against or about climate change in any sort of skeptical way was essentially career suicide.
Speaker 9: Activists are even calling for any skepticism to be criminalized.
Speaker 1: It's the story of an assault on individual freedom.
Speaker 8: It's a wonderful way to, increase government power. If there's an existential threat out there worldwide, well, you need a powerful worldwide government, you know, to cope with it.
Speaker 9: We see all these kind of, authoritarian measures being adopted in the name of saving the planet.
Speaker 8: You've suddenly got the population under control all over the world.
Speaker 1: We called it industrial progress. Since the industrial revolution, the development of free market capitalist mass production has made ever more goods ever more affordable to ever larger numbers of people. Mass production marched hand in hand with mass consumption. In the modern age, ordinary people enjoy a level of prosperity never before achieved in human history. But all the while, we are told, we were destroying the planet.
Computers have calculated what is in store for us. As we produce and consume evermore, the weather will get worse. The planet will boil. We, greedy humans, must accept limits on our lifestyle, consume less, travel less. Those who deny the climate crisis are not just wrong, they're dangerous, spreading the poison of doubt among a gullible population.
These deniers should be shunned and shamed and censored, for these climate deniers are flat earthers. They are anti science. Teaching at New York University is one of these climate deniers. Professor Steven Coonan is one of America's leading physicists. He was a science adviser to President Obama, and both vice president and provost of Caltech, one of the most prestigious scientific institutes in the world.
Speaker 2: I teach climate science to my students at NYU. And I always tell them, check the data or the papers yourself. And they all come out of that course with their eyes wide open.
Speaker 1: Professor Koonin's best selling book, unsettled, argues that mainstream scientific studies, accepted by official agencies, do not support the notion that there is any kind of climate crisis at all.
Speaker 2: Of course, I've been called a denier. And my response is tell me what I'm denying because I'm quoting from you directly from the official UN Scientific Reports.
Speaker 1: Dick Lindzen also dismisses the claims of climate alarmists. He's one of the world's leading meteorologists, who's professor of meteorology at both Harvard University and MIT, and has served on the UN's intergovernmental panel on climate change or IPCC.
Speaker 10: Even the intergovernmental panel on climate change, if you go to their section of working 1, group 1, which is the science, they don't support any of these claims. And I assure you having served on it, it's biased, but you couldn't get any real scientist to agree some of the nonsense that's being promoted.
Speaker 1: Will Hapa is also a denier and is another of America's leading physicists. He has been science adviser to 3 presidents and professor of physics at both Columbia and Princeton University
Speaker 8: There's this mischievous idea that's promoted that scientific truth is determined by consensus. In real science, you know, there are always arguments no science has ever settled. You know, it just, is absurd when people say the science of climate is settled. It's not. There's no such thing as settled science, especially climate.
Speaker 1: Doctor John Clauser is one of the most respected scientists in the world. In 2022, he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics.
Speaker 4: The science that's being done is appallingly bad, in my opinion. There are a large number of scientists who are in violent disagreement. They refer to themselves as skeptics. Since I am no longer worried about losing funding or a job, whatever, I call myself a climate change denier.
Speaker 1: These very eminent and respected scientists and others like them are not flat Earthers. They do not deny science. So what's the evidence that has caused them to dismiss the climate's alarm as nonsense? We are told that current temperatures are unprecedented and dangerously high. It's possible to check if this is true because we have evidence of Earth's climate history dating back 100, 1000, even 1000000 of years.
The desert of Judea by the Dead Sea. Professor Nir Shaviv from the Raqqa Institute of Physics has come here looking for clues. 1000 of years ago, this place was underwater. And etched into the rocks are lines which, if you know how to read them, tell the story of Earth's climate history.
Speaker 11: And here's the climate. We're at the, lake bed of, what used to be Lake Lisan. It's a lake that existed until the end of the last ice age. Back then, the lake level was maybe a 100 meters above where we're located. When we want to reconstruct climates of the past, we have to, look for evidence, for clues.
And when the, lake existed, it had the deposits. And by looking at these, layers here, we can actually reconstruct how the climate has changed.
Speaker 1: Warmer water means more life. The accumulation of more shells and bones from sea creatures, and other changes that are reflected in the ancient layers of the lake bed. The lines act as a kind of thermometer, and this is just one way geologists can reconstruct past climate.
Speaker 11: In other places, we can go to, stalagmite caves and see the annual rings that you have in the stalagmite. Or we can drill, coals from the, bottom of the ocean, and then, look at layers there. Or many other places. But here, I think this is one of the nicest places because you can actually see you can actually see how, the climate has changed.
Speaker 1: So when we look back in time, what do we find? For 200000000 years, dinosaurs roamed the Earth, an Earth marked by fertile dense forests teeming with life. And at no time during those 200000000 years were temperatures as cold as they are today.
Speaker 2: If you go back, let's say, 200000000 years, it was maybe 13 degrees warmer than it is now. So on the geological perspective, this is not at all unprecedented.
Speaker 1: For the last 500000000 years, temperatures have varied greatly. But for almost all that time, the Earth was much, much warmer than today. Compared to the last half 1000000000 years, the Earth right now is exceptionally cold. In fact, there are very few times when it's been this cold.
Speaker 2: We're relatively cold. Maybe not quite the coldest it's been in 500,000,000 years, but pretty close
Speaker 6: to it. We are in a remarkably cool period if we look over the last 550,000,000 years. In fact, only one other time period in that last 500 50000000 years was the temperature as cool as it is now.
Speaker 1: The mammals who now inhabit the earth began to evolve around 60000000 years ago, when the world was much warmer than today.
Speaker 6: We just look at the last 65000000 years. So this is after the dinosaurs go extinct, Mammals really start to take over and our evolutionary ancestors start to live on the land. Any time period within the last 65000000 years was warmer than it is essentially today.
Speaker 1: The Earth's mammals, humans included, appear to thrive when it's warm, warmer than it is now.
Speaker 7: There's no doubt that warm is better than cold in geological history. We are a tropical species. A human being in the shade naked dies at 20 C from hypothermia. We evolved on the equator in Africa. And the only reason we were able to get out of there eventually was fire, shelter, and clothing.
Speaker 1: Over the last 50000000 years, temperatures steadily declined, plunging the Earth into what geologists call the late Cenozoic ice age. We are still in that ice age.
Speaker 7: The reason there's all that ice on the poles is because we're in an ice age. Everybody knows that. Who knows anything about the history of the Earth? This is an ice age. We're at the tail end of a 50,000,000 year cooling period, and they're saying it's too hot.
Speaker 1: If we zoom in on the past few 1000000 years, we see temperatures sinking, and as they do, fluctuating between extremely cold periods and slightly milder periods. The extremely cold periods are called glacial maxima, when the planet is mostly covered in ice, and the slightly less cold are called glacial minima, when there's just ice at the poles. For the past 10000 years, fortunately, we've been in Holocene. With milder weather, humans began to emerge from their caves, And several 1000 years ago, we see the rise of the first great civilizations in a blissful period, which according to many studies, was considerably warmer than today. This is known as the Holocene Climate Optimum.
Speaker 2: It was called an optimum because people thought that warmer was better.
Speaker 1: Since then, temperatures have declined and begun to fluctuate. In Roman times, there was a blissfully warm period followed by a brutal cold period in the dark ages. Then came the balmy medieval warm period, according to many studies as warm or warmer than today, followed by an especially cold period known as the Little Ice Age, possibly the coldest in the last 10000 years. And here it is, the Roman warm period, the cold dark age, the medieval warm period, and then the very cold little ice age, from which, for the past 300 years or so, we've been recovering. The longest instrumental record of temperature in the world comes from Central England, and this is what it shows.
Since the worst of the little ice age from 16 50, the temperature has risen gently by a little more than 1 degree Celsius.
Speaker 8: The Central England record of temperature is a world treasure. You know, it's the longest continuous record that we have, and it's certainly not a very alarming record. It began in the depths of the little ice age, and so you can see the slight warming that followed the little ice age. And there's certainly nothing very alarming that's happening today, at the very end of the record. Most of the warming that we're observing today is the recovery from the little ice age, whatever caused that.
Speaker 10: Well, you know, we're talking over the entire industrial period of about 1 degree centigrade.
Speaker 1: To put this one degree in perspective, let's look at New York Central Park. Records show that there has been no overall change in temperature here since 1940. But from 1 year to the next, the average temperature can vary by 3 degrees Celsius without many New Yorkers even noticing. In fact, between the warmest year in the 19 sixties and the coolest in 2,000, there's a difference of 5 degrees Celsius.
Speaker 2: The average temperature on this day in this year might be 5 degrees different from the average temperature a year ago or 2 years.
Speaker 8: You know, when I hear people pontificating about 1 and a half degrees leading to the end of civilization, I think, what if they've been smoking? You know? Are you crazy? Alright. So
Speaker 1: According to thermometer readings since 18/80, there's been a very mild increase in temperature. Only by stretching the y axis on this graph is the increase noticeable. This is the rising line used by official agencies as proof of global warming. But is it accurate? Professor Ross McKittrick is an expert in statistical analysis at Guelph University He noticed something odd about modern thermometer records.
Thermometers, even in the same region, give out very different readings depending on where they're located.
Speaker 12: I was interested in the question of how do you explain the spatial pattern of warming. So some places warm a lot, some places don't warm much. And it turns out it's highly correlated with the spatial pattern of economic activity.
Speaker 1: Where there are more people and there is more human activity, there's more heat. This is known as the urban heat island effect.
Speaker 13: Urban heat island effect is essentially London. Right? You pick London. With buildings, with a lot of activities, tends to be a a few degree. I mean, we're talking now Celsius.
Right? Even 4 or 5 degrees Celsius, warm and then our skirt. This is a phenomenon of urbanization. This day is the obvious effect is actually concrete retaining retaining heat.
Speaker 1: This can be illustrated with the satellite heat map of Paris. The center of Paris can be as much as 5 degrees Celsius warmer than the surrounding countryside.
Speaker 13: Paris, London, Beijing, Shanghai, you name it. New Delhi, all of them absolutely demonstrated the defects.
Speaker 1: So how has this affected the official temperature record? In the early part of the 20th century, it was normal to erect weather thermometers just outside towns, close enough to check every day, but away from the heat of urban life. But over the 20th century, those towns have expanded. Suburbs have spread. There are more roads, more cars.
Thermometers which were once outside towns are now surrounded by shopping malls, offices, factories, and houses.
Speaker 5: These towns and all the locations where thermometers are located, on average, they've all grown in population, let's say since 18/80. You've got buildings, growing up around the thermometers. You've got parking lots. So you've got all of these non climate influences which are affecting the temperatures, which raises questions about the quality of thermometer data for monitoring global warming.
Speaker 1: To correct for this corruption of the data, an obvious solution is to use only records from rural weather stations, which have been less affected by urban development.
Speaker 14: This has now
Speaker 1: been done by a team led by doctor Willie Soon.
Speaker 13: We combine all the best rural station. Any anything that we can correct for, we correct for. And we show, if you just don't use this data set and use only rural, you you get a very different kind of picture.
Speaker 1: According to rural temperature records, temperatures rose from the 18 eighties but peaked in the 19 forties. Then there was a marked cooling until the 19 seventies. After that, temperatures recover, but are still today barely higher than they were in the 19 forties.
Speaker 13: What we see is that, basically, you have a warming from the 1900, 18, you know, fifties or so to 1930s 40s and started to warm and then cool in a substantial way to the 70s, about 76 or so. Instead of a long term systematic warming trend, it has a variability. Multi decade or like every 50, 60 years or so kind of a variation.
Speaker 1: It's not just rural thermometers that show little warming. Merchant ships and other naval vessels have been measuring the temperature of the sea since 19th century. In red, we see the land temperature record since the 18 sixties, which has been inflated by urban thermometers. But in blue is the ocean temperature record. From around 1900, the 2 begin to diverge.
Ocean records show far less warming in the 20th century, and the pattern more closely resembles the rural temperature record.
Speaker 13: Sea is not supposed to be, quote unquote, contaminated by urban heat island effect. Am I right? Yes. So when we compare the two record, within the range of uncertainty, this behavior actually fits.
Speaker 1: Scientists have also studied temperature change by looking at tree rings, which again shows very little warming. There's a gentle rise till the mid 20th century, a cooling to the 19 seventies, followed by a mild recovery. Once again, it shows temperatures today are barely different to those of the 19 thirties and forties, and the pattern closely resembles rural temperatures. Satellites too seem to be telling a different story. Our ability to measure global temperature accurately took a leap forward when satellites began to orbit the Earth.
One of the scientists who pioneered the use of satellites to measure temperature is doctor Roy Spencer, who in the 19 eighties was senior scientist for climate at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Speaker 5: We were discussing over lunch, isn't there some way we can use satellites to monitor global temperatures? Because as you know, the temperature network of thermometers is pretty skimpy around the world. So it's kinda hard to get a global temperature.
Speaker 1: Doctor Spencer's development of weather satellites was revolutionary. He and his colleague, professor John Christie, have been awarded NASA's medal for exceptional scientific achievement.
Speaker 5: Our satellite data begins in January of 1979. That's when we have complete global coverage, and we have it right up to the present.
Speaker 1: There was one critical question about temperature that satellites were singularly well equipped to answer.
Speaker 5: Has there been a spurious warming that has crept into the global temperature record over land, that's just a result of an increase in population. And that's something that we've been analyzing and working a lot on lately and we're finding that especially in urban areas, it's large. I mean, since 18/80, most of the warming, it looks like, is due to the urban heat island effect.
Speaker 8: We're lucky to have a few independent scientists like John Christie and Roy Spencer with their satellite measurements of temperature. Before they started releasing this, ground based temperature records were going wild. They were going up like crazy with no no bounds. But now they have to contend with the fact that there's this independent and probably better way of measuring the whole globe's temperature, which is not alarming at all.
Speaker 1: Evidence from multiple sources now agree that the official global temperature record, as used by world governments and reported in the world's media, is showing far too much warming over the last 120 years, artificially inflated by urbanization.
Speaker 12: You look at the weather balloon record, the satellite record, the rural record, the ocean record doesn't warm nearly as much as land. All of these indications show that the like, the big warming pulse in the record is the northern hemisphere land record, and that's also where most of this data contamination is happening.
Speaker 1: But if the mild warming that has taken place in the last 3 to 400 years, can any of it be attributed to human emissions of CO2? Professor Henrik Svensmark is visiting the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and taking a stroll in the evolution garden, dedicated to preserving the oldest surviving plant species on Earth. These plants aren't just pleasing on the eye. They can also tell us about levels of CO 2 in the atmosphere in Earth's geological past.
Speaker 15: What we have here is a a ginkgo tree, and it's actually a living fossil in the sense that this type of tree, first appeared about 270,000,000 years ago. On the underside of the leaf, there are what we call stomata, the cells where they can uptake c o 2. So they're actually measuring how much c o 2 is in the air, and then they adjust the number of the stomata to how much c o two there is. And by looking at fossils and measuring how many there are at a different time, it says something about what was the level of CO 2 back in time.
Speaker 1: So when we look back in time, what do we find? Over almost all of the last 500000000 years, the level of CO 2 in the atmosphere has been far, far higher than it is now. Even with modern industry's contribution to CO 2 levels, by geological standards, the level of atmospheric CO 2 today is close to being as low as it has ever been.
Speaker 15: At present, we have about, 400 parts per million. 50,000,000 years ago, it might have been 2,000 parts per million. So a much, much higher concentration of CO2.
Speaker 6: I think current estimates of global CO2 is 423 or so parts per million today. If we look through the Phanerozoic, the last 550,000,000 years, we would see a CO2 on the order of 7,000 parts per million.
Speaker 1: CO2 is plant food and the result of much higher levels of atmospheric CO2 in the past was a much, much greener world.
Speaker 6: Periods of elevated CO 2 tend to be time periods of of of a huge biodiversity on on the planet. In fact, we're in a CO 2 famine if we look over the last 550,000,000 years.
Speaker 1: At the depths of the most recent glacial maximum, the amount of CO 2 in the atmosphere sank so low, all life on Earth came close to extinction.
Speaker 16: They say CO 2 is higher than it's been for a 100000 years. But what they don't tell you, in that period they're talking about, is that CO 2 sank so low that all life on Earth nearly died.
Speaker 7: 20000 years ago, c02 is at the lowest level it has ever been in the history of the Earth, a 180 parts per million. If it had gone down another 30 parts per million, we'd all be dead.
Speaker 6: There is a low point of c02 where photosynthesis becomes so inefficient that plant life would die. Then everything else starts to perish after that.
Speaker 8: During the last, glacial maximum, there's good evidence that in many parts of the world, there was plant starvation from not enough c o 2. So, we should be very grateful that c 02 levels are beginning to go back up. We're still far from the historical norms, which would be several 1,000 parts per million. There's not enough fossil fuel to get there, but at least we're making a start.
Speaker 1: But has the small recent increase in CO 2 affected the temperature? We would now show you a picture of CO2, but we can't because it's invisible. CO 2 makes up a tiny fraction of the gases in the atmosphere, just 0.04 of a percent. It is just one of 25 different greenhouse gases, which, taken as a whole, form only one part of Earth's complex climate system. So what evidence is there that this trace gas is having any noticeable impact on the climate?
If it were true that higher levels of CO2 caused higher temperatures, we should be able to see that in Earth's climate history. Here, scientists are drilling into ancient ice cores. These cores tell us both about past temperatures and CO two levels. Scientists have indeed found a link between temperature and CO 2. The trouble is it's the wrong way around.
Speaker 8: So it's true over the last few 1000000 years of the ice age that we're in now that c02 and temperature are correlated. But if c02 is the driver, it has to change first, and the temperature has to change second.
Speaker 6: In fact, when you start to look at the data very specifically, you see the exact reverse. Temperature starts to rise first. And then on the order of a century to a few centuries later, we start to see a rise in CO2.
Speaker 12: It's long been known that, the temperature actually moves first. So temperature goes up, CO 2 goes up after that. Temperature goes down, CO 2 goes down.
Speaker 3: Ice ages start when carbon dioxide is at its maximum and ice ages and when carbon dioxide is at its minimum, which is the exact opposite of what would occur if carbon dioxide was controlling the temperature.
Speaker 16: The question of whether CO 2 drives the climate is easily resolved. You can look back in time over 100 of 1000000 of years. CO 2 levels have changed radically many times. Did this cause temperature change? No.
Absolutely not. CO 2 has never driven temperature changes in the past. Never.
Speaker 1: Nor is it clear in recent times that CO 2 is having any effect on temperature. Here, we see industrial output of c o two since 17 50. From the mid 19th century to the mid 20th century, there was only a slight increase. It's not until the 19 forties that industrial production of c02 begins to take off. But this doesn't match the temperature record.
According to rural thermometers, most of the warming in the past 200 years occurred before the 19 forties and have barely changed since then.
Speaker 2: One of the embarrassments that IPCC doesn't like to talk about was that the 19 thirties, when human influences were much smaller, were particularly warm.
Speaker 13: That's the puzzle that the first early part where we have such a sharp, warming from the 1900 to 1930s and 1940s, c o two could never cause the temperature rise.
Speaker 1: But the 19 thirties and early forties were so hot is puzzling. More puzzling still is what happened next.
Speaker 8: By the end of World War 2, CO 2 was really going up, and yet the temperature was going down.
Speaker 13: From 40 to 70 while the c o two continued to rise, these things started to cool. What happened?
Speaker 7: Journalists were writing about the coming ice age. It was on the cover of Time Magazine.
Speaker 3: 19 seventies, the new ice age was the big story.
Speaker 1: And how about since 19 seventies? According to computer climate models, over the past half century, rising c02 should have led to this increase in temperature. But according to multiple satellite and balloon measurements, what actually happened was this.
Speaker 5: Well, what we found from the satellite data is that the global atmosphere is not warming up as fast as the climate models say it should be. There's a couple dozen climate models now that have been worked on for decades. You know, 1,000,000,000 of dollars, tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars have been invested in these climate model efforts, and we find that generally speaking, virtually all of the climate models produce too much warming over this period since 1979 up to the present. Now even if we say the surface thermometers are correct, they still don't produce as much warming as most of the climate models say there should have been, let's say, in the last 50 years.
Speaker 2: The models individually and even collectively when you average over all of them in so called ensembles, they don't get it right.
Speaker 8: You can already see that the main, support of the climate alarm movement, which are these enormous computer models, they're clearly wrong. They don't agree with what we observe. They're all running much too hot. They don't get the geographical distribution of temperatures anywhere close. They don't get El Nino, La Nina cycles.
They're just nonsense.
Speaker 1: All climate models are based on the assumption that c o two drives temperature change, but actual observations and historical evidence clearly suggest that it doesn't.
Speaker 4: Yes. I assert that there is no connection whatsoever between c02 and climate change. That's all a crock of crap in my opinion.
Speaker 7: There is no truth to the idea that the earth is warmer now than it has been in the past. It's a lie. There is no truth that c o two is higher than it should be. That is a lie.
Speaker 1: Earth's climate has changed many times over the course of its long history and will continue to change without any help from us.
Speaker 8: Climate always changes. You know? Who denies climate change? It's always changing.
Speaker 1: But if CO 2 doesn't drive climate change, what
Speaker 0: does?
Speaker 1: In Earth's atmosphere, there are powerful forces at work. And perhaps the most powerful of all are clouds.
Speaker 4: C02 is quite unimportant in controlling the Earth's climate. What is important is clouds. Clouds don't absorb any energy at all. They simply reflect all of the sunlight back out into space. Big bright white clouds.
If you look at the Earth you see lots and lots of them and they vary dramatically from one day to the next. That is 100 of times more powerful than the trivial effects of CO 2.
Speaker 1: But what controls the number and density of clouds on Earth? Professor Henrik Svensmark from the Danish National Space Institute is in Jerusalem with the astrophysicist Nir Shaviv. Together, they've been exploring cloud variation and its effect on climate. And strangely, they found a link between clouds and exploding supernovae far off in our galaxy.
Speaker 15: When we have big stars, they don't live very long, I mean, relatively only maybe a few 1000000 years, up to 40000000 years. But they end their life in a huge explosion, which we call the supernova.
Speaker 1: An exploding supernova sends out vast quantities of debris, tiny charged subatomic particles known as cosmic rays, travelling almost at the speed of light. And as they hit Earth, they develop into seeds, which attract water vapor and form clouds. Professor Shaviv noticed that the amount of cloud cover on Earth is related to our journey around the Milky Way. As our solar system orbits the galaxy over 1000000 of years, it passes through the galaxy's spiral arms, dense clusters of stars. As it does, we are exposed to more or less cloud forming cosmic rays, and this corresponds to historic temperature changes on Earth.
Speaker 11: The really mind boggling thing is that using geology, you can reconstruct the climate on Earth over the past 1000000000 years, and you can reconstruct our galactic journey, and both tell the same story.
Speaker 1: But what about temperature change on shorter timescales? The sun, our source of heat and light, a seething mass of gigantic magnetic storms, which vary in strength and number over time and which affect Earth directly and indirectly. When it is very active, the sun sends giant gusts of solar wind through the solar system. The solar wind warms us indirectly by acting as a barrier, limiting the number of cloud forming cosmic rays reaching Earth.
Speaker 15: So from the sun, we have the solar wind. It carries the sun's magnetic field, out to a large distance, and it works like a shield against cosmic rays. When the sun is more active, you have a
Speaker 11: stronger solar wind. You have less cosmic rays reaching the inner solar system and reaching the atmosphere. And the clouds which are then formed are less white. They reflect less of the sunlight, which means that it's going to be warmer here on Earth.
Speaker 1: Here is a proxy reconstruction of ocean temperatures over 1000 of years. And here is one of solar activity over the same period. What is causing the ocean temperature to change is clearly variations in solar activity.
Speaker 13: Because IPCC is determined to go on a narrative that only CO 2 can drive the climate system, they turn off the sun essentially. Right? Because the sun is just a background thing for them. That it doesn't do anything.
Speaker 1: Astrophysicist Willie Soon decided to look again at the rural temperature record for the past 150 years. Then he looked at a record of changes in solar activity over the same period. To doctor Sun, it was obvious that it was the sun, not CO2, that was driving temperature.
Speaker 13: As of 2023, IPCC says is that the sun have absolutely zero chance in to explain the changes of the climate system on broad scale, let's say global warming on Northern Hampshire. We say no. We can easily deperate the sun, can explain it. All of it. There's 0 for the c02, 100% for the sun.
How's that?
Speaker 1: Why are these and other studies never reported in the mainstream media? And if climate change is natural, what are we to make of the alleged terrifying increase in extreme weather events, of the heat waves and hurricanes, of forest fires, droughts, and the rest?
Speaker 2: My first instinct as a scientist and what I teach my students is, well, let's look at the data. And when you do that, you discover, as you can read in the IPCC reports themselves, that it's pretty hard to find trends in extreme events, much less attribute them to human influences.
Speaker 12: You've now had decades of putting the idea in people's heads that anytime the weather is bad, it's climate change and greenhouse gases. So I think people at this point can't help themselves. If you have a heat wave, immediately everybody's thinking, oh, what have we done to the weather?
Speaker 2: If somebody says in the news this is the warmest day since 1980 or something, well, you can look up the temperature records and see for yourself whether it was in fact warmer in the 19 thirties as it often is.
Speaker 1: US temperature records are the best in the world, and here is the official US government record of heat waves in the US over the past century. It shows very clearly that the 19 thirties were far more prone to heat waves than we are today. Not only were there more heat waves in the 19 thirties, the heat waves then were much hotter than those of today. Likewise, official figures show that the number of hot days in the US has markedly declined.
Speaker 3: United States was much hotter in the 1930s. North Dakota reached a 121 degrees. South Dakota was a 120 degrees. Wisconsin was a 114 degrees. These sort of temperatures are just completely out of range of anything people experience now.
Speaker 1: A common mistake is to suppose that higher average temperature will mean more hot weather, but this isn't true. Here again is the Central England temperature record, the longest instrumental temperature record in the world. Summer temperatures over the past 3 to 400 years since the end of the little ice age have barely changed at all. It is winter temperatures that have been slightly rising. The Earth's climate has not been getting hotter.
It's been getting milder.
Speaker 8: That's certainly being observed all over the world. If you look at temperature records, high temperatures are almost unchanged. But cold temperatures at night or during the winter are are going up a little bit. Not very much, but you can measure it.
Speaker 2: When the average goes up, it's really more due to the coldest temperatures getting warmer. So the temperature's getting milder rather than getting hotter.
Speaker 1: What about the increasing number of wildfires we're often told about?
Speaker 2: If you look at the actual number of forest fires from satellite observations, the actual number is going down.
Speaker 1: Here is an estimate of global wildfires since 1900. It shows a clear decline. And here is a record of areas affected by wildfires in the US. It shows that wildfires were far, far worse in the 19 thirties.
Speaker 13: From 19 thirties and 19 twenties when you have data, it was huge. 5 to 10 times bigger than the current level.
Speaker 1: How about hurricanes? The US has by far the best record of hurricane activity in the world. Over the past 120 years, there is no overall change. In fact, the trend is slightly down.
Speaker 2: When you look at the data for hurricanes, technically tropical cyclones, you see that there is no long term trend.
Speaker 1: How about the rest of the world? Here is a chart of global hurricane activity over the past 40 years.
Speaker 8: The hurricanes have been around forever. You know? We've got good proxy records of hurricanes, and, there's been no change in their frequency. Even the IPCC admits that.
Speaker 1: How about melting ice caps and drought? Here's a satellite record of temperature in Antarctica since the late 19 seventies. It shows no increase whatsoever. And here is a record of global drought since 1950. There is no observable increase at all.
Polar bears are meant to be going extinct, but studies suggest their numbers are growing. The Great Barrier Reef too has recently reached record levels.
Speaker 7: There's no such thing as a climate emergency happening on this planet now. It's there's no no evidence of 1.
Speaker 3: Yeah. The extreme weather event story is is just absurd. There there's no basis to it at all. It's just based on propaganda. The actual data shows the opposite.
Speaker 2: I've shown you the official data, the official science. Tell me what I'm denying.
Speaker 8: The climate alarm is nonsense. You know? It's it's a hoax. As as I I I don't I've never liked hoax. I I think scam is a better word, but I'm willing to live with hoax.
Speaker 1: But why are we told again and again that man made climate chaos is an undisputed scientific fact beyond question, beyond doubt? To answer this, we must examine the so called eccentric scare story put about by radical environmentalists. But then the cause was picked up by an ambitious young senator, Al Gore, who would soon become vice president. A $1,000,000,000 a year of public money was made available for research into climate change. This quickly rose to 2,000,000,000.
Speaker 4: Up to that level.
Speaker 1: Academic researchers in various disciplines began to apply for this climate funding.
Speaker 2: If you want to qualify for money that's labeled climate, well, you take whatever you're doing and you add a little bit, of climate speak to it and away you go.
Speaker 10: You're dealing with the sexual habits of cockroaches, you'll add, and the impact of climate.
Speaker 12: So all I have to do is add a little wrinkle to my grant application to explain how, well, I'm worried that climate change will mean the death of all the maple trees. And so right away, you qualify for funding.
Speaker 1: Academics of every kind lined up for climate funding. Climate became an exciting new area of interest for sociologists, biologists, professors of English literature, lecturers in gender studies,
Speaker 13: and many more.
Speaker 10: And it also served to create a community. I mean, you know, you've become a climate scientist now even though you know nothing about the physics of climate.
Speaker 1: Thousands of papers were published on climate change and prostitution, climate change and beer, climate change and the black death, climate change and disability, climate change and video games, and everything else imaginable.
Speaker 12: There's an almost comical list of studies out there. Just do a Google search on climate change and and everything comes up.
Speaker 1: Few of these papers ever questioned whether climate change was actually true.
Speaker 2: After you've done the research and you write the paper up, sometimes you find there's no effect at all from climate. But you still have to say in your papers, oh, yes. Climate change is real, and, we just need to study this some more.
Speaker 1: Since so few of these so called climate studies challenged the idea of climate change, it was declared that there was a scientific consensus. Climate change must be true. Climate also became a new focus for government funded research bodies.
Speaker 4: Scientific research in the United States tends to be dominantly funded by, government grants. And so whatever government grants are offered, sort of determine much of the science being done.
Speaker 1: It was during the Cold War that many government research bodies were set up. But the end of the Cold War and pressure on government spending has left many of them struggling to justify their continued funding.
Speaker 5: United States Congress only funds problems. Okay? Research into problems, whether it's money that goes to NASA or NOAA or National Science Foundation or Department of Energy or any other alphabet soup organization.
Speaker 8: It's always been a problem to support your research or your existence or raison d'etre. And so climate was
Speaker 5: a godsend. If Congress is willing to pay you to find evidence of global warming, by golly, as a scientist, we're going to go find evidence of it because that's what we're being paid to do. And guess what? If you don't find evidence or say the evidence suggests it's not a problem, your funding ends. This totally corrupts the way we look at the science.
Speaker 4: When the famous gangster asked, why do you rob banks? And he said, well, because that's where the money is.
Speaker 1: The climate alarm brought funds. And the bigger the supposed threat, the more funds seem to flow. The publicly funded science establishment now had a direct financial interest in playing up the alarm.
Speaker 6: So there's a huge incentive to over exaggerate or to speak in hyperbole, even if the data doesn't support exactly what you're saying, because that's what brings the funds. I was in that boat. I was someone that was defending climate change as a grad student quite a bit because the truth is I didn't give it too much thought, but I I thought, well, it's getting a ton of attention. It brings a ton of money into the Earth Sciences. Even if I don't buy all the hyperbole, what's the problem?
Speaker 1: By the late 19 nineties, what had started as an environmental scare story was gaining momentum. Western governments and their senior civil servants were more than willing to address the climate problem. Green taxes were levied, Green regulation expanded. And this in turn generated more climate related jobs and activity.
Speaker 12: Take the banking sector for instance. Say to a banker, we want you to file reports with the the regulatory commission on how climate change is going to affect your bank. Well, the banker doesn't know anything about this subject, so then they have to commission studies from academics. And, of course, the academics are happy to come and tell them, well, it's gonna be terrible for your bank. It's gonna cause all kinds of problems, and you get you need to give us money to research this.
Speaker 1: Green subsidies and regulation meant there was now money to be made in climate. Renewables firms sprouted. Consultancy firms offered advice on what they called sustainability and climate compliance.
Speaker 2: It's a wonderful business opportunity. Okay? You want climate, we'll give you climate.
Speaker 1: The renewables industry alone now turns over a $1,000,000,000,000 a year, and that's expected to double in the next few years.
Speaker 4: What used to be a cottage industry has is now blossomed to become a major part of the world economy.
Speaker 1: The growth of this climate industry has seen an explosion of highly paid green jobs. Chief sustainability officers, carbon offset advisors, ESG consultants, climate compliance lawyers, and countless others.
Speaker 6: Students started to come into our departments as earth science departments with a focus on climate. That never happened before. But they started to look at their career prospects, and they were smart. And they were looking at who's hiring. And the fact of the matter was is that everything in the hiring pool had climate somewhere attached to the name.
Speaker 12: I started a few years ago seeing programs like, a master's degree in climate finance. And I just what on earth is is climate I don't understand what a master's degree in finance is. Well, now you need a university that's going to teach this program. You need professors of climate finance.
Speaker 9: Every single school or university or business will have a climate officer or climate officers and a climate program. And you look at any of these institutions or businesses, you will find they all are signed up to it, and anyone who hasn't signed up will come under pressure.
Speaker 1: At the last gathering of the publicly funded UN's IPCC, 70,000 delegates flew in from around the world. Government bureaucrats, green NGOs, carbon sequestration consultants, environmental journalists, heads of renewables companies. But this is just the tip of the iceberg. Many hundreds of thousands of jobs worldwide now depend on the climate crisis.
Speaker 12: When you start building this enormous population whose job is to manage the crisis and, and also explicitly to make sure that people are alarmed about the crisis because this whole industry depends on the existence of the crisis.
Speaker 1: But therein lies the one great threat to this multitrillion dollar industry. All the jobs, all of the funding are totally dependent on there being climate crisis.
Speaker 6: If c o two isn't having the huge negative impacts that we claimed it was having originally, how are we going to stay in business? How do we justify our existence if climate change isn't this existential threat that we claimed it was over the last 4 decades or so?
Speaker 5: So. People like me, our careers depend on funding of climate research. This is what I've been doing just about my whole career. This is what the other climate researchers are doing with their whole career. They don't want this to end.
Speaker 3: If NASA said global warming is not a problem, where does their funding disappears, right? So they can't say that. I mean, you've got the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change. If they said the climate isn't changing, they'd have no reason to exist.
Speaker 6: The IPCC has a self preservation instinct to show that climate change is an existential threat. Otherwise, there's no reason for them to be collecting the money and doing the work in the first place.
Speaker 4: There are not just now 1,000,000,000, but there are 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars at stake.
Speaker 3: There's a huge amount of money involved. This is a huge big money scam. A lot of people's livelihoods depend on it. They're not gonna give that up.
Speaker 2: If suddenly the notion becomes apparent that this is not such a problem, you're gonna see that as an existential threat.
Speaker 1: Scientists who studied the natural causes of climate change began to be viewed with suspicion as 2 Harvard astrophysicists discovered.
Speaker 13: How much does the sun change, and how does it change, and why does it change? And then we didn't even want to get into the temperature record, the climate immediately they will come after because when we started to estimate that the sun changed by quite significantly in terms of climatic sense, immediately the attack is there because it's not following the narrative because they need the CO 2 to be the only one, the only dominant player.
Speaker 17: When you try to say, well, see, we're just looking for the background of natural variability, we, the response would be we can't have natural changes as an effect. It has to be human caused. And some of that was directly stated, but most of it was indirect. Your funding for this kind of project will be dropped. This kind of project doesn't go anywhere.
Speaker 10: By that time, anything that contradicted the narrative of global warming as a serious problem was not going to get funded.
Speaker 1: Editors of academic journals came under pressure not to accept papers, which were deemed to be skeptical of the climate crisis.
Speaker 10: We will not publish anything that questions this. I mean, it's not something surreptitious.
Speaker 1: Scientists who dared to point out in public that there was no climate chaos began to be sidelined and shunned.
Speaker 12: If a scientifically qualified person stands up and says, we don't see an upward trend in the data on Pacific typhoons, Well, suddenly they lose standing to address the topic of Pacific typhoons, not because what they said is wrong, but because it's off message. They can marginalize any kind of criticism of the narrative by saying you're not qualified to talk about this because you don't support the narrative. That is then and then having marginalized everyone who doesn't support the narrative, they can turn around and say, well, everybody who counts supports the narrative, so we must be right.
Speaker 1: Environmental journalists ignored skeptics and instead offered headlines to anyone prepared to make the most outrageous claims and predictions about a climate apocalypse.
Speaker 5: It's gotten to where it has nothing to do with the science anymore. It doesn't matter if your alarmist prediction doesn't come true. You're still gonna retain your status as an expert, and the media is still gonna come and ask you for your opinion even though you were crazy wrong about your predictions.
Speaker 1: But the consensus on climate is not only enforced by those in the climate industry. To explain the broader appeal of the climate alarm, we must look at the politics behind climate. From the start, the climate scare was political. It came from the environmental movement, the sworn enemy of free market industrial capitalism.
Speaker 9: Finally, we've got them. We can claim that it is the free markets who are destroying the planet, and we need big government to save us.
Speaker 1: The climate problem, it has said, stems from the irresponsible actions of greedy, feckless individuals who have too many babies and drive too much and consume too many products, and of the capitalist corporations who pander to their whims. The solution is for government to have greater power to regulate private companies, but also to guide and reshape the lives and habits of individuals.
Speaker 12: Policy agenda has sprawled into micromanaging everybody's lives on the most minute detail, what kind of stove you can use, what kind of heater you can have, how much you can set the thermostat out, where you can drive, what kind of car. You can't. According to the planners, we're not going to have internal combustion engines an hour from now.
Speaker 5: All of these things require the government to get involved. Right? Because the government has to sort of force changes upon the public. If it was up to the public, we wouldn't be buying electric vehicles because, you know, they're impractical.
Speaker 1: Support for the climate alarm is now virtually synonymous with disdain for free market capitalism and a yearning for bigger government.
Speaker 5: It's liberals versus conservatives in the United States. And generally speaking, liberals are worried that we're destroying the planet. And they're also, of course, for big government and then conservatives are at the other end of the spectrum where they a lot of them don't believe that we're destroying the planet and they don't want government involved in their personal lives.
Speaker 1: Paying lip service to the climate alarm has become almost universal among those who depend on government for their livelihoods. This includes those in the publicly funded education, arts, and science establishments. Tony Heller recalls his time at Los Alamos Labs.
Speaker 3: The entire county of Los Alamos was kept going by government money that we, we had the highest incomes in the state. So naturally people who lived in Los Alamos supported big government because that was where their livelihood came from. That was where their good schools came from. You know, every everything good unless all of us came from the government. So, of course, they were all believers in big governments.
Speaker 1: Among the largely publicly funded Western intelligentsia, support for more government spending and regulation is almost a defining moral badge. In these circles, to question the climate alarm is socially unacceptable. To be a climate skeptic is taboo.
Speaker 6: Somebody that goes against it, it really does get met with a lot of anger and vitriol. And, you know, you're called a denier, a science denier, and a heretic.
Speaker 2: Your colleagues won't engage with you anymore. You don't get invited to conferences. Your students, may desert you. This is all really terrible.
Speaker 1: Professors Henrik Svensmark and Nir Shaviv describe what happened when they published their results on the climatic effects of solar activity.
Speaker 15: It was like all hell had broken loose because of this work. I had no idea that, things would, escalate as they did, And it completely changed my life.
Speaker 11: Once we said that, people didn't like hearing it. And we became a persona non GAAPA.
Speaker 15: I mean, I have so many instances of people doing really nasty things. When I applied for a job, a group of scientists writes to the university, say they shouldn't hire me, And that's a typical story,
Speaker 11: unfortunately. If you don't agree with a standard, polemic, you become an outcast. You shunt
Speaker 9: as if you have leprosy.
Speaker 1: For professor Sally Balayounis, the personal attacks became too much.
Speaker 17: I retired early. And my family said I should have retired even sooner, years sooner. So they noticed the toll. It took a toll on them and me.
Speaker 1: Doctor Matthew Wylicki was an assistant professor of geology at the University of Alabama when he decided to speak out about the climate scare. As a result of the backlash, he has decided to leave teaching.
Speaker 6: To speak up about climate change in any sort of skeptical way was essentially career suicide. Absolutely. There was no possible way that I would publish
Speaker 1: in quite a few of
Speaker 6: the mainstream journals that I was required to publish in. I essentially isolated myself from many of the funding institutions. This is one of the reasons you can build a consensus in a community is because anybody who is skeptical of that consensus essentially gets kicked out of the community.
Speaker 2: Speaking out in scientific ways that go contrary to the consensus, I would say is a career killer for people at the early stage of their careers.
Speaker 8: If I were 30 years old in a university trying to make a career, I I would certainly keep my mouth shut. And in fact, I I went to some effort to keep my mouth shut when I was younger. I I knew climate was nonsense then, but I was a little bit careful.
Speaker 10: If a young person is questioning this, they can't put that in a proposal. The proposal will be denied, and they can't effectively publish because the gatekeeper will keep them out. And so it it would end their career.
Speaker 3: You have to go along with with the global warming story. If you don't, you're gonna get cut off, you're gonna lose funding, you're gonna get your career ruined, you're gonna be trashed by the community. You'll be despised by your coworkers.
Speaker 1: The so called consensus on climate has itself become a weapon, a form of bullying, intimidation, and censorship used against those who refuse to conform.
Speaker 6: It's a it's a tool that people use to bludgeon their opponents and the skeptics and to attack their character.
Speaker 1: According to its critics, critics, far from being scientific, the militant intolerant climate consensus represents a devastating assault on free scientific inquiry.
Speaker 2: I see my job as a scientist as just laying out the facts and letting people decide what they wanna do. When you can't talk about the facts, things become corrupt.
Speaker 17: If you shut the door on ideas, if you say you're not allowed to test it, you're not allowed to have that idea, you've left the realm of science.
Speaker 5: I don't think climate researchers will ever back down from their claim that increasing c 02 is the control knob on today's climate system. I I don't think they will ever back down from that no matter what the evidence is.
Speaker 10: It's clear it's now a cult, completely divorced from science.
Speaker 1: But the apparently unstoppable climate scare does not just represent an attack on science. It is starting to shape for us a new kind of society. Environmentalists like to pose as anti establishment, but their demands are well received and piously echoed by King Charles, the archbishop of Canterbury, the BBC, the UN, the EU, by heads of government, the World Bank, and World Economic Forum. In fact, by the entire state funded ruling establishment.
Speaker 5: Global warming is like the perfect problem that government can get involved in to grow the influence of government.
Speaker 8: It's a wonderful way to increase government power. And if there's an existential threat out there that's worldwide, well, you need a powerful worldwide government, you know, to cope with it.
Speaker 18: If you're a climate activist, you're actually facilitating a huge, validation of the government running our lives.
Speaker 19: Many environmentalist, most environmental, all environmentalist who consider themselves to be radical progressive alternatives are in fact simply reinforcing the mantras and the mainstream arguments of the entire establishment.
Speaker 18: The demands on the government mean that the government suddenly gains the authority to interfere into every nook and cranny of our lives and how we live.
Speaker 6: Everything has a climate narrative attached to it. How much you consume, where you spend your money, how much you travel, who you interact with, what types of food you eat, whether you eat meat. Everything has some sort of aspect that can be controlled with a climate lens.
Speaker 12: Suppose 20 years ago somebody had hatched the idea that I would really like to ban cheap energy. I'd really like to control everybody's appliance purchases. I'd really like to tell everybody where they can go. And basically, I'd like to have dictatorial control over everything. Well, it's not gonna fly.
I know everybody would think you're a nut and would ignore you. But fast forward 20 years, that's what's happening.
Speaker 1: The publicly funded establishment in the west is so large and powerful. It is able to impose and enforce the official consensus on climate through its control of schools, universities, government, and much of the media. State broadcasters like the BBC exclude climate skeptics. Broadcasting regulatory bodies forbid private stations from disseminating skeptical views, threatening them with having their broadcasting licenses revoked.
Speaker 9: What normally happens in an emergency is that all normal forms of openness and democracy have to be suppressed because how else to deal with an emergency? So we are facing a situation, not unlike lockdown, where basically all normal forms of behavior, normal forms of social communication, and normal forms of democracy are essentially ruled out. Activists are even calling for any skepticism to be criminalized.
Speaker 1: In certain jobs and professions, it is now dangerous to express dissent on climate.
Speaker 9: It's no surprise that people, who are more skeptical will think twice before voicing their concerns because they might risk their careers, they might risk their business, they might risk being sacked.
Speaker 7: If you're a professional of any kind in science or law or medicine, if you belong to a professional association or you are in a university, you can be fired for saying what you believe.
Speaker 9: The consequence is a sinusorious authoritarian regime that has to control every move, every word, everything you want to do because everything you do is a potential risk to the survival of mankind.
Speaker 1: Climate protesters condemn capitalism. But at their anti capitalist rallies, it's hard to spot anyone who looks like a worker, like a docker, or crane driver, or steel worker, or a beautician, or a trucker. The workers, it appears, are totally absent from these rallies and for very good reason. Today's climate alarmists complain not that capitalism isn't producing enough, but that it's producing too much.
Speaker 18: The modern capitalist system has led to prosperity. More and more people have more and more things. The modern anti capitalism of the present time is a critique of capitalism that it gives us too much.
Speaker 20: They think that the problem with capitalism now is actually that it's giving out too many rewards en mass to ordinary workers. And what they want instead, and this is often very explicit actually, is a much more austere, simple kind of lifestyle in which the mass consumption, the consumption choices of the great bulk of the population are controlled or even prohibited.
Speaker 9: You have to consume less, you have to, holiday less, you have to drive less, you have to eat less, and so on.
Speaker 1: It seems that what upsets many environmentalists is not the failure, but rather the success of capitalism in producing an abundance of affordable goods for the masses.
Speaker 18: Ordinary working people for once, we've arrived at a point in history in the Western world at least, where mass manufacturers allowed them cheap clothes, cheap food, cheap furniture. Therefore, you get a clash when affluent environmentalists express their disdain for mass consumption. People going on those big huge cruise ships. It's like thousands of them. It's like what are they doing?
Oh my God, and all those cruise ships like ruining Venice, you know, ruining all our beauty. We own them, don't we? They're not what are they going there for?
Speaker 10: What you have
Speaker 20: here is a classic example of class hypocrisy and self interest masquerading as public spirited concern. You could take these kind of green socialists much more seriously if they lived off grid, they cut their own consumption down to the minimum, they never flew. Instead, you get constant talk about how human consumption is destroying the planet. But the people making all this talk show absolutely no signs of reducing their own.
Speaker 1: What environmentalists call degrowth is being achieved by the trashing of our conventional energy and transport systems and the forced introduction of expensive and unreliable alternatives. Already, this is having the desired effect on industrial manufacturing, which is straining under the burden of punitive green taxes and regulation and higher energy prices.
Speaker 16: The people behind the climate alarm couldn't give a damn about manufacturing. They have nothing to do with it. They don't know people who work in manufacturing whose jobs and lives depend on it. They're not excited by industry or industrial progress. They explicitly wanna shut it down.
Speaker 1: Kisii, Kenya, East Africa. According to many leading environmentalists, the world's poorest people should not aspire to the lifestyle of people in the first world. The planet will not cope. Grace Nyakananda is one of the many Africans who do not have electricity or gas to cook with or heat their homes. The resulting indoor smoke from burning wood and dried dung is the deadliest form of pollution in the world.
For 1,000,000, the cause of lung disease, blindness, and early death. It's not just cheap reliable electricity that Africa needs. Agricultural productivity here is incredibly low. Increasing it takes fossil fuels to make fertilizer and drive tractors and other farm machinery. Jasper Mashogu is a farmer.
Speaker 14: Each and every African wants to develop, and increasing improving agriculture is one of the easiest ways to do that. Agriculture is tightly tied to fossil fuels. Fossil fuels that the western nations are saying we should not have access to.
Speaker 1: Around a third of the food produced in Africa rots before it ever reaches the mouths of consumers. To prevent this terrible waste, Africa needs plastic packaging, refrigerated lorries, and good roads. All are opposed by Western environmentalists. All come with industrial development. All rely on affordable fossil fuel energy.
Diarrhea from drinking dirty water still kills 100 of thousands of African children, But clean water requires large industrial water purification plants and a modern water supply network. And this will come only with cheap energy.
Speaker 14: I think it's pretty obvious that the West has got what it has because of fossil fuels. When people say Africa doesn't need fossil fuels, I wonder. I don't think they want what's best for us. They don't want us to develop, and that means we continue being starving. We continue being, poor.
Most people don't know what climate change is. They don't care. They just they want food on their table. They want to beat poverty. They want to beat hunger.
They need money to better their lives. They want to flourish. That's just it.
Speaker 19: When they use the word sustainable development, they're talking about no development. Exactly. I mean, it's the point is is that, you know, to develop sustainably means not to use too much energy, not to use too much carbon, you know, net zero. The the idea that you must use too many resources, the fact you mustn't produce enough consumer goods because consumption is bad. So ultimately, you know, the idea of development is out the window.
Speaker 9: The Greens think the Africans should never use their resources the way the Europeans or the Americans or the Canadians or the Australians have used theirs. They are also in favor of punitive taxes, border taxes on any African country that wants to export their goods to Europe if they do use their resources. So that sums up the ethical ruthlessness and depravity of the green agenda.
Speaker 1: But climate alarmists have a problem. Many countries in Africa and across Asia are simply ignoring the environmentalist demands of Western governments and international agencies. Communist China is estimated to be building an average of 2 new coal power plants a week. China now uses more coal than the rest of the world
Speaker 9: combined. Which is one of the reasons why this whole climate agenda is falling apart because the rest of the world is not cutting emissions, is not moving to renewables.
Speaker 1: In the west too, for many people, climate alarmism is wearing thin.
Speaker 16: Ordinary people are not stupid. They have seen one ridiculous claim after another fail over and over. What this does is leave people with a profound and justified cynicism about what the scientific establishment says and about what the government says.
Speaker 1: To fix the climate crisis, we're told
Speaker 9: we must give up our cars.
Speaker 1: We must pay more for fuel, heating, clothes, food, fly less, limit where we go. This attack on mass travel, mass tourism, mass consumption, holds little appeal to the masses.
Speaker 18: People have started to realize it's going to cost them a lot of money to simply live the lives that they weren't leading, that they want to lead. And as soon as that started to happen, I could see people in the United Kingdom who had previously been indifferent to environmentalism. Suddenly, think, how dare they do that, right? How dare they try and take away what we consider to be not luxuries, but necessities.
Speaker 19: The whole policy of sustainability is about restraint. It's about restrictions, about doing less, and that, obviously for most people is anathema to their everyday needs.
Speaker 18: The fact that there is actually an ideological movement of people who think that cheap mass production of whether it's houses or anything else is a problem. I mean, for god's sake, no wonder people become disdainful of the kind of middle class outlook of environmentalism. But that is literally what people say. How can we stop people buying cheap things in shops?
Speaker 1: When climate protesters climbed onto an underground train in London's East End, they were not cheered on by working commuters. They were heard of use, pelted, angrily dragged off the train, and received rough treatment on the platform.
Speaker 20: If you were to go into a pub, frequented mainly by what the Americans call blue collar workers, you will find that being tell that behind all the talk about climate, emergency climate crisis, what there actually is, is an animus and a hostility towards them, their lifestyle, their beliefs and a desire to change it by force if necessary.
Speaker 1: Unitive and restrictive policies carried out both in the name of climate change and COVID have sparked protests in Britain, Canada, and other western countries. Anti establishment politicians and movements are gaining support.
Speaker 18: What they what they underestimated was the fury that this would meet, with ordinary people. They just say you can't do this, so you suddenly get this new movement.
Speaker 1: Many working people are not merely skeptical, but positively angry about the climate alarm and all that flows from it. There is a suspicion or perhaps realization that climate change is an invented scare driven by self interest and snobbery, cynically promoted by a parasitic, publicly funded establishment, hungry for evermore money and power, an assault on the freedom and prosperity of the rest of us.
@mastarP001 - 🤐
@WallStreetApes This video was taken down on all platforms, but we keep putting it back up🔥 Please share this on every timeline 👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/2GbLl4CwRT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The focus should be on whether the people or a small group control the government, not which party is in power. The establishment has benefitted while citizens have suffered, but that will change starting now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. That all changes starting right here and right now.
@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch
This video I posted on Facebook last night just got TAKEN DOWN after amassing over 1.2 million views for “misinformation.” Watch till end and you’ll know exactly why. https://t.co/LRBNpnwO9S
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes they witnessed history at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, because Elon Musk endorsed Trump and spoke on stage. They claim Kamala Harris will destroy the country, but assert that unnamed people in suits are actually in charge, making decisions unknown to the public.
The speaker identifies the media as the biggest enemy and threat, distributing "fear porn." They urge listeners to vote for Donald Trump to save the country, claiming that without a Trump victory, there will never be another election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's your honest reaction to the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania earlier today? I feel like I just witnessed history. Why do you say that? Because if you had told me in 2016 or even 2020 that Elon Musk would not only endorse Trump, but go on stage and speak at his rally, I I would say you're crazy. Kamala Harris will destroy our country because it's not Kamala Harris in charge.
It's the people in the suits that we don't even know about making decisions that we don't even know about because the only decisions that we know about is what the media decides to tell us. The biggest enemy to the people and the biggest threat, it's not a single individual. It's not Kamal Harris. It's not tampon Tim Walz. It's not senile resident Joe Biden.
It's the media. Do you know what the most popular category of porn is? Fear porn. And it's distributed by the media. So make sure that you make your voices heard.
You cast your vote for Donald Trump. You save our country because if you don't, there's never gonna be another election again.
@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch
Dude. I just posted this video on Facebook - and after it amassed over 2.7 million views they removed it for “misinformation.” Watch it till the end and you’ll know exactly why. https://t.co/n50JRVBEPP
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm for Trump in 2024 because Republican viewpoints fit me better. The trials are propaganda, they're all friends like in the WWF. Trump, Biden, Obama.
I'm for Trump's viewpoints because he's a businessman, and people only talk about him personally, not politically. He's a good politician because he's not one. Everybody has someone they can't stand, and he can't stand the same type of people others can't stand.
When he was president, nobody was fighting wars. He and Dennis Rodman got along with Kim Jong Un, and he was the first president to go to North Korea. Everybody was getting money. He was real and told you how he felt. You knew what you were dealing with.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that Trump should go to jail? Hell, no. Why? We all break the law sometimes. It's alright.
He ain't hurt nobody. Free that man. Yeah. I'm off of Trump, man. So you're saying Trump 2024?
2024. All day. All day. See? All day.
Why? To To me, it's not really a Trump thing. It's just that, you know, the Republican point of views just fit me a little better. Do you think that the trials are making them more popular? This is all part of the plan.
Yeah. All propaganda and bull. They're all friends like the WWF. Trump, Biden, Obama. They're all friends.
This ain't number the series. You get a chance to write, direct, produce, and star in your own episode of life. I'm for the Trump point of views because, I mean, to me, he's just a businessman. Everybody that talk against him, talking personal. Nobody's even talking politics.
I think he's a pretty good politician because he's not a politician. He might be a narcissist. And as far as that racist, everybody got mother they can't stand. And to be honest, he can't stand the same type of mother can't stand. And they're not black.
They're not white. They're not Hispanic. He can't stand business. It's 4 kind of people on this planet. Four kind of adults.
Men, women, and every race has them. He's not really down with the bitches that because I'm tired of them too. And when he was here, nobody was out fighting the war. Him and Dennis Rodman killed the shit with the dude in North Korea. Kim Jong Un.
He was the 1st president to go to North Korea. Everybody was getting money. Yeah. It was cool. I'm listening to nobody, and I was balling.
You know what I'm saying? It was cool. I mean, his watch, He was real. He was doing his job. And what I liked about him the most is the things that regular people hate about him the most.
He was real. He told you how he felt. He could've lied like other politicians just to make you like him. One thing about him, you know what you're dealing with. You heard it here first.
@TaraBull808 - TaraBull
This video is being DELETED (check my pinned post) SHARE IT EVERYWHERE https://t.co/I0j0ggcsbJ
@DomDocuments_ - Dom_Documents
Viral Documentary - "The Architect". 95% are unaware of most of these truths. My hope is that you enjoy it, learn from it, and share it. ♥️ https://t.co/MlfYQhXbgT
Video Transcript AI Summary
We, as Jewish people, have aimed to control the world for over 3,300 years. Our plan involves changing Americans' perceptions of reality, a brainwashing process completed through demoralization over generations by instilling Marxism-Leninism, Americans themselves further this through a lack of moral standards, making people unable to assess true information.
Throughout history, Jews would lend money at interest, circumventing usury laws and eventually controlling economies, leading to expulsions. Jews revolutionized the adult industry, controlling it and eliminating antisemitism. Jews are overrepresented in finance and financial crimes, exploiting loopholes and sometimes acting contrary to their own laws and beliefs. Some claim that Zionists are controlling the media to change narratives about Israel and that there is a plot for a one world financial system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All those tropes about Jews controlling the world or at least wanting to control the world, they're actually true. Our goal as Jewish people for the last thirty three hundred years since the revelation at Sinai has been to control the world.
Speaker 1: To change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and it's divided in in four basic stages. The first one being demoralization. It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years?
Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of of of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxism Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of of of at least three generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The demoralization process in The United States is basically completed already for the last twenty five years. Actually, it's over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even comrade Andropov and and all his experts would would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans.
Thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he he is going to receive a kick in the in his fat bottom.
When the military boot crashes his balls, then he will understand. But not before that. That's the tragic of the situation.
Speaker 2: They gravitated towards the porn industry because it's like kind of the seedier cousin of the Hollywood industry, which had already been controlled by the dudes. And, basically, they pretty much just took it over. The godfather of the modern day porn industry, his name is Ruben Starman, who was actually an orthodox Jew. He owned over 200 bookstores all around the country. He's actually my godfather.
What the Jews did pretty much was they revolutionized the adult industry and made it their own. So there was no space for antisemitism, and they basically controlled everything. But back in the eighties, the only way you could get pornography was to go through someone like Ruben's sermon, and he controlled, you know, all of his stores and all the stores that that he didn't own. They had actually had to pay him a tax to carry his product. Ruben Sermon, actually, eventually, he died in prison.
Not from they tried to get him from obscenity back in the eighties, which was a big thing. And it actually still is a resident obscenity arrest today. But he eventually died in prison because of tax evasion because he didn't want to pay taxes. Back in the seventies, the majority of the male pro porn performers were the Jews.
Speaker 3: Compound interest has been illegal throughout history. Write that down. Compound interest has been illegal. It has been called usury. Any interest rate is called usury.
Usury is illegal. So in Christian nations, lending money for an interest rate was illegal. So because it was illegal for the Christians, who did the lending? The Jews. So there was Christians who could lend for 0% or no didn't lend at all.
And then these people called the Jews would come over and start lending money. They would start charging money. And in a couple generations, guess what would happen to the economy? The Jews owned everything, and then guess what the king did? Rounded them up and threw them out of the country.
Then they go to the next country, and what would they do? Same thing. And what would that king do? Round them up, kick them out of the country. This went on for thousands of years.
This is this is why the Jews in history have had no country because the king would have the they would say no usury, no money lending, and they would start the money lending. They would start the central bank to compete with the king. The king would kick them out. They go to the next country. Do it again.
So this has happened over and over and over again because this quote right here from Napoleon, he's he would show the compound interest tables, and he said in a very short amount of time, compound interest would eat up every piece of property in France. In fact, I'm gonna show you how powerful compound interest is. Very scary thing, and there's a reason why it was illegal. Illegal, illegal, illegal in the Christian nations and the Christian philosophy because it would literally enslave people. Guys, the interest on credit cards enslaved people today.
Does student loans enslaved people today? We no longer have forced slavery. We have debt slavery now. It is no longer forced slavery. There's not a massa with a whip whipping you anymore to pick cotton or something like that or build wallets or whatever you're doing, build boats, all sorts of slavery.
We now have debt slavery where somebody prints money, and you now have to pay the money back plus interest. K. So Pareto's principle. In Italy, an economist named Pareto noticed that 80% of the land was owned by 20% of the families. The start of modern banking was in Italy.
You had the Jewish population there, and they would exchange gold for notes. And in Italy, you had the Pareto principle, 80% of the land was owned by 20% of people. Who's heard of the eighty twenty rule before? That's from Italy. And I want you to write this formula down.
Time times compound interest equals power. So when you compound numbers over time, that becomes extremely powerful.
Speaker 4: Jews are overrepresented in all areas of the financial arena, especially financial crimes. Names like Ivan Boesky, who the character Gordon Gekko in the 1987 movie Wall Street is based upon, junk bond king Michael Milken, Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff, and most recently, cryptocurrency con artist Sam Bankman Fried have become synonymous with Jewish financial fraud with the impact of their financial crimes still being felt by Americans who suffered due to their unbridled greed. Remember, their holy book, the Talmud, permits cheating and stealing. A Jew may rob a goy. He may cheat him over a bill.
Speaker 5: Before I begin, because I'm gonna be back up here, I wanna note that it's better to be slapped with the truth than kissed with a lie. So I'm not here to appeal to people's feelings. I am here to tell the naked, unvarnished truth. Now all of us have been brainwashed since birth. So what I am about to say is gonna sound extremely offensive to a lot of people, but truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
So what I wanna address is the the COVID response because it was ridiculous. And everyone responsible, beginning with you, ought to be very ashamed of themselves. Because if you can't figure out basic math that ninety nine point nine percent of people are recovering and you just crashed the economy and took money out of the pockets of landlords and and crashed small businesses, which this is why your people got kicked out of a hundred and nine countries. You we have a problem. We have a big problem, and this is going to continue ongoing.
This is an outrage to America. You talked about law. This is a travesty to law. There is no law because the information and money are completely controlled by a small group of people. And if you say their name, you're called an anti Semite, which you're just itching to say right now.
But I know your games.
Speaker 6: I've heard enough of you.
Speaker 5: You know you're not. I have free speech. I have free speech. You Jews, this is your game. This is what you play.
This is what you play. No. No. This is what you play. So, anyways, this is so so, anyways
Speaker 7: So so
Speaker 5: so I have free speech. No. Wait a minute.
Speaker 8: Wait a minute. Wait a minute. No. No. Believe me.
We agree on this, but let the speaker speak because you're right. As at
Speaker 5: it. Stop No. No. I have as have thirty seconds.
Speaker 8: Is to to hear it. He has the right he has the right to
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 9: Is evil.
Speaker 5: Don't Can put thirty seconds back on? Because I had thirty seconds.
Speaker 7: You have fifteen seconds.
Speaker 5: We go right ahead. Thirty seconds, please.
Speaker 7: Yeah. Fifteen seconds. Please proceed.
Speaker 5: So as I was saying before, I was rudely interrupted. I don't interrupted. I don't hate with doctor I do not hate now if I interrupted, you would kick me out with the police. Why why are they being allowed to interrupt me?
Speaker 7: Because you just said something super antisemitic.
Speaker 5: What's wrong with you? So we can have a private discussion. Not have
Speaker 1: a Thank you for your comments.
Speaker 10: Your time
Speaker 1: is complete.
Speaker 9: From the
Speaker 5: audience that are interrupting me. I would like my time to be restored. Now what? Go.
Speaker 11: Take your seat.
Speaker 7: Your time is complete. Our next speaker is Marvea Sala.
Speaker 12: I turn around, and I see a sight that I undescribable. Here is a young man standing with a rifle pointing right at me. And I look at him. He had sunglasses on. I couldn't see his eyes.
I couldn't see his soul. And I lifted up my hands. I lost my index finger on this hand after four hours of surgery yesterday to try to save the index finger on the left hand. I turned around and I saw the children that were playing in the banquet hall. I ran to gather them together.
Miraculously, just miraculously, the gun jammed. And I see Laurie laying on the floor unconscious, and her dear husband, doctor Howard Kay, who's like a brother to me, is trying to resuscitate her, and he faints, and he's laying there on the floor next to his wife. And then the daughter Hannah comes up screaming, daddy and mommy, what's going? This is the most heart wrenching sight I could have seen.
Speaker 13: They had on every Wendy's cut gosh, this was must have been 02/2006. There was a little coupon to send into Airtran for frequent flyer miles. At some point, I would just go to Wendy's drive through and just buy cups off them and then send them into Airtran. And then I realized that if I had a hundred Airtran credits, they would buy a flight anywhere in the world on any airline. So I'd have them book me a ticket on Continental, and then I'd cancel the Continental ticket for travel credit.
And so I had tens of thousands of dollars of Continental travel credit
Speaker 11: Basically buying Wendy's cups.
Speaker 14: Buying a stack of Wendy's cups from a local Wendy's for A
Speaker 13: few bucks.
Speaker 14: A few dollars and turning that into $10,000 in travel credits.
Speaker 13: Continental, which never you know, I've I've still been I've I've been using them for years after that.
Speaker 15: The Jewish owner of a Winnipeg cafe physically attacked her family's business trashed and painted in anti semitic graffiti. It shocked the community and led to an outpouring of support exactly the way you'd expect. But then today, it all got turned upside down. Police say the cafe owners staged the whole thing and have charged them with a crime. As Cameron McIntosh tells us, even as the family sticks by its story, the community is in shock once again.
Speaker 11: Did you fake the vandalism around
Speaker 16: the We Because we don't joke about swastika on our walls.
Speaker 17: They flatly deny it, insisting they are in fact victims of hate. Oksana Barrent and her son Maxim explaining themselves on CBC Radio just after being charged along with Oksana's husband hours before for public mischief.
Speaker 16: In this moment, somebody grabbed me.
Speaker 17: She insists on last Thursday night, she was alone inside her Winnipeg cafe when she was attacked. The cafe was also robbed and vandalized with anti Semitic graffiti. The story caused an outpouring of sympathy and defiant denouncements of hate until today.
Speaker 18: In the end, we found evidence of a crime. It just wasn't a hate crime. I am hugely disappointed and frankly angry that this family has used hate and racism in such a disingenuous way.
Speaker 16: It's not something that we do. It's against our Jewish law. It's against our our our our beliefs. They can find any evidence against anybody.
Speaker 17: At first, some members of Winnipeg's Jewish community deemed it the most brazen local anti Semitic attack in memory. The cafe had been up for sale, as is Oksana's home. Bernie Bellen writes for Winnipeg's Jewish Post in News. He says hate attacks involving assault are rare.
Speaker 8: My first instinct was that this is terrible, but it doesn't have the normal hallmarks of an anti Semitic incident.
Speaker 17: But the Barons insist they were targeted and say they're scared.
Speaker 16: It's completely broke our family, our business, everything.
Speaker 17: Meanwhile, an interfaith vigil that was planned for tomorrow night here at the cafe has been canceled, and a crowdfunding campaign that was set up to help support the family has been taken down amid a lot of disappointment, confusion, and anger.
Speaker 19: In conjunction with my Israel has arranged a instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza Flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in in nature.
Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we as Israelis and as Jews can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, and it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I've personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel, small things, and my changes were erased or undone, and I didn't understand why. And I think that this kind of knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that?
And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you just search us for certain terms related to Israel, it's just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs.
Speaker 20: When when there's, like, photos of the Nazis burning books, it's books on homosexuality and trans transgenderism that what's the guy's name?
Speaker 21: Magnus Hirschfeld. Matt Walsh is a liar about that. He tried to assimilate that the Nazis created transgenderism. It was a Jewish man. Magnus Hirschfeld started the world sex reform who started all these crazy theories.
The books that the Nazis burned were these books. Yeah. Matt Walsh completely lied about it. The leading figure talking about how trans is destroying children. Be honest about who created it.
Why would you lie about that? Who told you? Who got Who is that Nazis? Only that daily wires? Back out the call.
Speaker 17: So to be clear,
Speaker 7: the only books that Nazis burn are ones about LGBT stuff?
Speaker 21: No. They burned a lot of books, but that was one of the books, and they don't talk about it. The misconceptions that the the Nazis were burning all these books about education. It was about sex reform education. Yeah.
They don't tell you that.
Speaker 20: Yeah. That's something that is like that pictures that they when they show Nazis burning books, they say, oh, they're burning, you know, Jewish biblical the Jewish text, whatever. What they're really burning is a lot of time, books on homosexuality and transgenderism is what they were I'm glad that you brought that up because, yeah, that's Alan Matt Walsh. Like, dude, you gotta know who started that.
Speaker 22: But he
Speaker 21: does know. He's lying on purpose.
Speaker 17: Yeah. He wrote a note. Oh, a
Speaker 21: %. If you look at the tweet, you see how he says, like, Magnus Hirschfield, a German,
Speaker 8: and in the first
Speaker 21: sense, he's talking about
Speaker 7: a Nazi.
Speaker 21: He's trying to equate Nazi with German. They kicked him out of German. They renounced his citizenship. Yeah. Magnus Hirschfield was expelled from Germany.
Yeah. But he's he's he's explicitly doing that to try to get leftists on their side That's a hell of suck up the daily wire. Matt Walsh, I really like your documentary, but you're a liar and you know it.
Speaker 7: You said yourself that powerful institutions are at play here, and there's coordinated effort to spread this parasitic ideology. So I have a question for you. Are you willing to name the group behind us? Because behind all these institutions, there seems to be a Cohen, a Berg, a Stein. So I have a question for you.
What are your thoughts on the Jewish influence about on gender ideology?
Speaker 11: Am I gonna do anything about the Jews is what you're asking me? No.
Speaker 23: I've got a question, it will take one second and I'll let you. So just like the Bolshevik, Jewish individuals are overrepresented in the ownership and senior staffing of The U. S. News media. The news media also is inexplicably hostile for Russia.
If the current war mongering against Russian Christians is in any way motivated by the same ethnic hatred that motivated the Holodomar, we must face that truest quantity. So here's my question. If Jewish individuals hated Christian Ukrainians enough to strike millions of them to death, could the same thing happen today? Could Jewish individuals use the position of power to seek out revenge against places like Europe and Russia that have a history of exponses? Thank you again for your work.
Just remember rule nine, know, it's like maybe maybe there's something here that that you don't know about, you know? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And I am trying to just speak the truth.
Okay.
Speaker 24: Weight, all cats, dogs, horses, everything.
Speaker 8: What about my holocaust? I kill millions of plantai. I put bullet in back of people head. Dude, you call that branding? No.
No. I kill million of people. Pull apart. You suck at genocide. No.
I kill way more people. It's not about how many you kill. It's about how you sell it. Listen, buddy. No one cares about the sick shit you did in the jungle.
You know? No. I killed million of people. That's not that doesn't sell it, baby. Come on.
That doesn't sell it. That's not even that scary. Everyone's all lined up and shoot everybody. Oh, big fucking deal. Well, no.
We. Where's the pile of shoes? I get pulled bullet in back of head and put in ditch. You're not getting it, Paul Pott. You're not getting it.
You wanna make an industry around your genocide to last for centuries? You need piles of shoes. You need soap. How fucked up is it to make soap out of people? Do people really do that?
No. Fuck. No. They didn't do that. That makes no sense.
Why would you clean yourself with people you find disgusting? I know. How why would they do that while they're fighting a two front war? They didn't. That really make no logical sense, but it doesn't matter.
It's about emotion. It's about selling it. Now you bring in a movie where you have there's it's black and white except for a little girl in a red dress. Oh, you're remembering that shit now. And then they put you into a a gas chamber with wooden doors where you claw at it.
And for some reason, the claw marks are in cement. Come on. Come on. This is how we brand it. Well, I kill more people with my gun.
Baby, you gotta sell the fear. You gotta sell the horror. You gotta sell it subtly with a pile of shoes. What if people see through it and start talking about it? You make it illegal.
You put them in jail for hate. So logically, if someone does the math and realizes it's not possible, that's called hate. That don't make no sense. Popot, you're not getting it. Genocide isn't about killing people.
It's about brand awareness. Brand aware do you have Killing Fields Incorporated? Fuck no. We just used a field to kill people. You're not getting it.
You have to use corporate documents, liability shields, and then make that money, baby. Come on, Paul Pot. No way anyone that stupid. You feed them pornography and KFC. They're that stupid.
Speaker 24: Get him laid down next to the road. Okay. Closer to the road, Jerry. Move them. It looks like we're in middle of a forest.
Speaker 23: No. Close close close.
Speaker 24: Okay. Jerry, tell the cameraman to keep Clarissa in shot. Okay? It's not the Blair Witch Project. That's it.
Perfect. Again, get nice and close. Get the camera in nice and close. When I look around, Jerry, just look around as if you're in danger. Try and look nice and scared.
Yeah. That's it. Catching your breath. It's scary over here with all the bumps going up and all that. You just stop swearing.
You're overdoing it. Can you hear me? Yeah. Good. Now we're getting set up on sound and visual.
We should be going live in about about fifteen seconds. Okay. Were
Speaker 16: you guys
Speaker 25: rolling on this?
Speaker 24: Yeah. We're rolling, Clarissa, but we're not live yet. Okay. We can't show the early bit because we want people to think you're in danger.
Speaker 7: They took the babies out of incubators. Took incubators and let the children to die on the Fourth Floor.
Speaker 17: They had kids in incubators, and they were thrown out of the incubators so that Kuwait could be systematically dismantled.
Speaker 15: But was it true? Two weeks after liberation, it became apparent that the story was a complete hoax.
Speaker 22: Do you agree with what Israel is doing? If you're asking about, do I agree with Israel bombing some parts of Gaza? No. I don't agree with what Israel is doing. I actually think they should do much more.
They should completely annihilate the whole place, take over the land. Anyone that wants to survive just simply has to leave. They annihilate everything, make it into a little football field, and then whoever is a decent human being is gonna be allowed to live there under Jewish rule.
Speaker 11: Did you know that Israel was created in 1948? Because this is Palestine. What most people don't know is that Israel is not a country. It is an occupation of Palestine Since 1948, we're talking about a military occupation that's been going on for seventy five plus years. Seventy five plus years.
I want you to imagine how you would act if your home's name was changed and it had been stolen and your neighborhoods were stolen and your kids were arrested and they were held indefinitely and bombs were dropped because everybody wants to think that you're a terrorist even though you have no recourse for the situation you're in. Ask yourself why none of these old maps labeled the region Israel. Why? Because it's not Israel. And the Torah is not a land contract.
Speaker 26: I bet you didn't
Speaker 11: know that Palestine was gifted to the Zionists in 1917 by Lord Balfour called the Balfour Declaration. Notice the name up in the corner, Lord Roth schild. That's right. The region of Palestine was gifted to Lord Rothschild in 1917. True story.
If you think these people are terrorists that deserve this, you are sadly mistaken. These people live like this. This isn't just recently. They stay like this because Israel is always on the offensive. Then there's this POS.
Benjamin Netanyahu aka Bibi. Yeah. This guy's a complete warmonger. A a remnant of the George Bush era of ultra right wing fascism. That's right.
This man is a right wing fascist. A militaristic blood soaked monster. And before you go getting it twisted, the definition of a Semite is a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language including in particular Jews and Arabs. That's right. So every time Israel does something against Palestinians, it's anti Semitic.
That's right. Learn the definition. And let's add to that that anti Semitism and anti Zionism are not the same thing. Okay? So what is Zionism?
Good question. The difference between Zionism and Judaism is extreme. Judaism is a religion. They practice the Mosaic law, thou shalt not kill. And that is a good thing.
Zionism, however, is not Judaism. It is a movement for the reestablishment and the development and protection of a Jewish nation that is now Israel. See the difference? Judaism is not Zionism. Anti Zionism is not antisemitism.
Plain and simple. They're not gonna show these images on the news. Oh, no. Because the mainstream media is controlled by Zionism. So you're not gonna see Palestinians carrying their children around on the nighttime news.
You're just gonna hear how Israel needed to do this in self defense. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I am so burnt out on their nonsense.
This is clearly Palestine. This is 1750. Where's the Israel? There was no Israel. Israel is an occupation.
And yet another map. This one from 1767, Palestine. I'm exhausted and the people of Palestine must really be exhausted. So please share the truth. Spread the truth.
This is the truth. Palestine has been under attack for seventy five plus years by the occupation of Israel. It's been said.
Speaker 23: I love you. We had a successful vaccine. The efficacy was more than ninety percent.
Speaker 12: Oh my god.
Speaker 27: First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down. And the record will show, Neil, that we didn't recommend shutting everything down. I recommended to the president that we shut the country down. And that was a very difficult decision because I knew it would have serious economic consequences, which it did.
Speaker 25: Our schools mandated the vaccine. The kids were being kicked out because they didn't get the vaccine. The only reason my kids didn't kicked out is because they weren't yet 16. But I mean every week we got the really looking forward to getting Yates' vaccination card, getting Yarlie's vaccination update. Well, you're long time waiting.
It's not coming. I thank God I didn't I didn't stick them with that vaccine. I'm sorry I did it to myself. I've said this before, but I I regret getting the vaccine even though I'm a 52 year old woman because I don't think I needed it. I think I would have been fine.
I'd got COVID many times, and it was well past when the vaccine was doing what it was supposed to be doing. And then for the first time, I tested positive for an autoimmune issue at my annual physical. And I asked I went to the best rheumatologist in New York, and I asked her, do you think this could have to do with the fact that I got the damn booster and then got COVID within three weeks? And she said, yes. Yes.
I wasn't the only one she'd seen that with.
Speaker 28: See, right there, even with the language, you get a cold or a flu. The word get is a problem. That is coming from the germ theory brainwashing, that you are victim who walks around in your world getting things. I was just walking down the street and then I got a cold. I just went to a party and now I have a cold.
I I got it from someone. This is the sea change that's needed for our thinking. You didn't get anything. You made your sickness. The toxins in your body from your lifestyle made you sick, made you have symptoms.
Symptoms are healing you. Symptoms are expressions. They are releases of toxins that have been stored inside your body, and there are triggers for those things. All kinds of things can say to the body enough. You go to a party, eat a bunch of junk, drink a bunch of alcohol, stay up late.
Next day, you have a stuffy nose or a sore throat. You go, oh, I must be get I must have got something when I went to that party. Well, that's called victimhood, and that is just not how the body works. And the sooner we get out of the germ theory brainwashing and understand that those particles actually have never been isolated or shown to cause any disease in any way, shape, or form, They don't actually exist as described in fact by the methods section of every virology paper that exists that we've examined. So the problem is this, we don't want to take self responsibility for actions and behaviors.
It's way easier to pass the buck onto somebody else or somewhere else or an invisible floating particle for why we have expressive symptoms. And the way we speak, the way we assume is part of this issue. So we need to change the word I got it or I'm getting it or I acquired it from someone else or it's this. I'm blaming this particle for why I'm sick. No.
You made yourself sick with your lifestyle by poisoning yourself, by suppressing symptoms with drugs and shots, and not allowing the mechanisms to actually work as designed, which is to create the symptoms to push out the wastes and that means mucus formation. All the symptoms that you associate with a cold or flu is actually a healing process of your body to rebalance it and to remove all the garbage that you've been putting inside your body. Whether it's from negative thinking, emotional trauma, the poor diet, all of those things matter and they accumulate inside of you. So you didn't get anything. You don't get a cold or flu.
Colds and flus are detox. That's it. So this nonsense has to end, really. It has to stop because it's just pushing forward these ideas that somehow magically we collect a particle like some sort of, you know, bacteria or some sort of living particles, like, hurting us randomly. It doesn't happen.
That's not reality. What real is is our behaviors and actions create consequences, and our body needs to balance, and our body needs to express and remove the waste. And that's what we're seeing, and that's all colds and flus are. They have nothing to do with an invisible particle, irrelevant, absolutely, hogwash, unscientific, and fraud. And anybody pushing the idea that we get these things is a hack.
I'm sorry. You've had more than enough time to do the research, to do the deep dive, to understand these particles don't exist. And here you are still pushing it. So what what's our conclusion? There's only two conclusions.
If you're still pushing germ theory, you're either an unresearched idiot or you're a plant with an agenda. It's pretty much the only two places you can go with that.
Speaker 26: The function in weaning the pagan world away from paganism, which was did not care about morality at all. And the Rambam says that this was God's divine plan to spread a recognition of Hashem and morality to the furthest islands of the world
Speaker 6: that every Like the verse says, I think it's Isaiah 49 or 42. It the nations, the islands will put their hope. In him, in the Messiah, the islands will put their hope and wait for his law. That's what they said. That was the goal.
That's what they tried
Speaker 26: to do. The world, there would be a sense of knowing God. And therefore, the Rambam said, Christianity served a noble purpose, although in many distorted ways. And, Vacav Emden is even much much stronger at this. He has some remarkable statements about Jesus, which I I don't wanna get into right now, and he actually saw Jesus as kind of almost like a prophet to the Gentiles.
Speaker 6: So another rabbi sees Jesus as a prophet to the Gentiles. He's a satanic trap for the Gentiles. He's a bait and switch SIOP against the Gentiles. It was always the plan that they'd get their victim status while still be shielded and protected in eradicating the idol worship. And then now, not a coincidence, they're twisting Christianity to be extremely pro Israel, philosomatic, and their greatest servants and enablers and allies and Noah Heights.
It was always a step to make it was a stepping stone to make the nations be Noah Heights Slaves.
Speaker 29: You call people who can see the truth, can see the lies, conspiracy theorists while they're trying to save you. But you need to understand they have used lies to justify their killing for decades. They lied about weapons of mass destruction. They lied about the war on terror. They lied about JFK and nine eleven.
They lied about the pandemic and the vaccine being safe and effective. They are lying about climate change and the global financial collapse. Children and pregnant women have died from their lies about the vaccine. Children and babies and families in their millions died in Iraq and Afghanistan on the basis of their lies. Soldiers, your sons and daughters and grandchildren died in wars that were based on a lie.
Do you understand? Just because you can't see it doesn't make it true. And because we did nothing about it in the past, we're next. They're coming for us. They've already succeeded in their war on us.
Millions are dead. We have to stop them. We're next.
Speaker 30: At HIAS, we like to say that we used to help refugees because they were Jewish, and now we refugees because we are Jewish. So what can you do to help? Educate, advocate, serve, and donate. We know that the most effective advocates and activists are those who are well informed on the issues they work on. This World Refugee Day, consider making a commitment to educate yourself and your community about refugee and asylum issues.
You could make a goal to read one article each month. You can even set a Google alert for the terms refugee or asylum seeker to have articles delivered right to your inbox. You can also check out HIAS at home for more information about educational webinars and briefing calls, the Jews for refugee Facebook group where you can be in conversation with and learn from activists around the world, as well as many other opportunities to educate yourself and take action. Together, let's commit to building a vibrant and well informed global Jewish movement for refugees.
Speaker 9: There is plenty of evidence that the entire exercise of Hitler's rise to power was about dislodging and having
Speaker 23: a
Speaker 9: mass migration of Jews to the Holy Land, which in the nineteen thirties was it was be going on in wholesale. They were bringing shipload after shipload aboard Nazi ships while flying the Nazi flag into Palestine. What Rothschild and his cronies were understood was that they would have to build a state that they could run their operations out of, not dissimilar from what the criminals in the hole in the wall in Missouri did back in the eighteen fifties and sixties. They had a lawless place where the authorities didn't couldn't get them. When you get through the canyon walls of Israel, you are free to to breathe again because you've been committing crimes whether it be organ stealing or pedophilia or white slavery or embezzlement or or one of a thousand different crimes these people are involved in including drug pushing and they're behind the cocaine profiteering.
They're behind the ecstasy explosion. They're behind the opium production that's coming out of Afghanistan into the West and so forth. And so if ever they're on the hot seat, they can run to Israel because Israel has no extraditing treaties with any other country.
Speaker 23: What do you see going forward here? How do you see the Rubik's cube being spun?
Speaker 9: They're going to collapse the economies of the West and the financial systems, and they're gonna place humans the West well, the West especially, but people around the globe into a horrific financial malaise, difficulty to feed families and and just laying the zehrab on steroids, if you will. If you've ever read the the book by Victor Hugo, then you'll know what what real suffering's about. And then when people are clamoring for for a solution, they're gonna come up with the solution. It's a Hegelian dialectic. You know, they create a problem and they and they let it fester long enough and then they offer the solution and they get the people themselves to ask for their own enslavement.
Essentially, they're gonna be asking for a worldwide financial system that is born out of their control through the Bank of International Settlements. So the the BIS runs the world's central banks, and that's a Rothschild slash Oppenheimer slash Brofman bank. And they have in excess of 300,000,000,000,000 in in nominal value. But more importantly, they are the principal owners of every major corporation in the world through preferred stock ownership that will survive. The ones that are not in their portfolio will be forced out of business.
And they are also in charge of the banking elite structures around the world, and they're also in charge of all of the natural resource as well, like timber and coal and oil and water now they're going after. They're even going after the air. So they're gonna control lock, stock and barrel everything and they're using a technique of force multiplier with these new technologies through drones and through other other electronic surveillance and so forth to allow themselves, though they're small in number, to affect all of us and control all of us. Technology is giving them this tyrannical edge that will, unless we stop it immediately, it will function for them. It will work.
We are, however, fighting back to the point where they are certainly worried. There's no doubt. I have informed many many millions of people, tens of millions, probably 50,000,000 or more. If you'd like to listen to somebody who knew the story, there's a Jewish man who I have the highest regard for. His name is Benjamin Friedman.
He did a presentation at the Willard Hotel in 1961. He's long dead now, Ben Friedman. Listen to what Ben Friedman said about this group what they control and what their goals are. You'll get a very clear understanding of just how dangerous and how imminent the full control is at the moment. There is also a eugenics agenda.
There's also a a a depopulation agenda. And that is really taking shape as well. You're watching a part of it is the pushing of homosexuality and the gender bending chemicals they're using to stop people from procreating. And they're using vaccines to sicken people so that they can't reproduce. Bill Gates is is big in the involvement of that and many others are as well.
So there's a multipronged attack on humanity and it's it's having terrible effect on us, you know, but in the last century before anybody really understood all this was happening, the Jews directly were responsible for over a hundred and forty million deaths. So you have in one century, hundred and forty million deaths. They're going to do much worse than that this time around. You know, we've got 7,100,000,000 people on the planet and they're looking to cull a large portion of that out and and we are going to fall under tyranny in many parts of the world, if not all, and unless we stand up and stop it. And many people understand that today.
@DomDocuments_ - Dom_Documents
This is the first documentary I put together. Received 80k views on YouTube in two-weeks, messages from all over the world. My channel was banned with no reason given. My hope is that you enjoy it, learn from it, then share it. ♥️ https://t.co/PhxzicgWfo
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm speaking out because my fully vaccinated son, Jackson, had health issues. With SB277, my perfectly healthy, vaccine-free five-year-old can't attend school in California. I cried for weeks, feeling I was meant to fight a company bigger than some countries.
I used to sell Vioxx at Merck, which was later found to have manipulated data and covered up heart attack risks. This made me realize things on the market aren't always safe. If a vaccine is added to the schedule, drug companies can make billions. I cannot stay silent.
Pharma influences medical education and research, leading to biased studies. The FDA and CDC are compromised, with conflicted leaders and revolving doors. Pharma creates customers for life, especially with vaccines for kids. They prioritize profit over people, and it's up to us to take back our health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hear this well.
Speaker 1: Hear this well. Please hear this well. Hear this well.
Speaker 2: My grandson Daughter, Lily And my daughter. My son was fully vaccinated.
Speaker 1: My son, Jackson. I had
Speaker 2: a healthy, typically developing boy.
Speaker 3: Please hear this well. Hear this well. A lot of people say, Brandy, so you worked in pharma. They don't really like it when ex employees speak out. Why do you do this?
You know what? They don't. They don't play nice. But I do this for him. Because he is my world, and I want a better world for him.
A world with better health. A world where we have the right to decide what goes into our bodies. Because what more fundamental right do we have than to our health? I did not start speaking out until s p two seven seven last year. Probably a lot of you know about that.
It's the law in California now that says, my son, is five years of age and completely vaccine free and perfectly healthy, cannot go to school, public or private, in this state. But this is only the beginning. I cried for two weeks when I heard about 27 7 because I had this feeling, this innate feeling that something was coming, that I had a big mission in this life. My mom used to say, the only reason she was born was to give birth to me because I was going to change the world. She died when she was 40.
I was her only child. I knew something was coming. And when I heard about s p two seven seven, I cried for two weeks because I thought, oh my god. I am meant to speak out against a company that is larger than most small countries. That is holy smokes.
That's not exactly what I planned in this lifetime. This is only the beginning, s b two seven seven. USA Today wants all parents that don't vaccinate to be in jail. Time Magazine wants all of their addresses released publicly like a sexual predator's database. And you know what I learned in pharma?
They always drop hints. Those who have the privilege to know have a duty to act. So people always ask me, why? Why would you take on pharma? Are you crazy?
Well, yeah. I'm crazy. I'm crazy enough to think I can, you know, grow an army to do it. And I know that I was put here to do this, and I have the knowledge, and somebody's gotta act. And we cannot rely on everybody else to do it for us.
We have to take back our health, and we have to stand up to the system, each and every one of us in this room. How did I get here? When I was working at Merck, I was a sales rep for Vioxx. The whole scandal started when it was discovered that Merck had manipulated data and covered up the fact that Vioxx actually caused twice the amount of heart attacks and strokes than the placebo. What I learned from that experience was just because things are on the market does not mean they are safe.
I think we get into a very dangerous territory with vaccinations. If a drug company gets just one vaccine added to the schedule, they can make upwards of $30,000,000,000 in one year. Does anyone remember Vioxx? Oh, yeah. It would it killed people.
It killed people, and Merck knew it. So another reason I'm here today is because I sold a drug that killed people, and that haunts me. So when I came back with my vaccine free son from Europe, and I was saw this whole push for vaccines. And when s p two seven seven came out of the docket, I said, holy smokes. This is where they're going next.
I cannot not speak out about this. My experience selling Vioxx, which I won sales awards for, four times increase in heart attack and risk and death. Merck knew this. They stopped the study that we were already talking about with doctors. And then all of a sudden, your materials are confiscated, and you can't talk about it anymore.
And if you ask questions, well, you don't get answers. It was the largest drug recall ever. $6,000,000,000 was paid out in fines. But you know what? It was still a blockbuster drug.
They still made 10,000,000,000 off of it. All of those lawsuits, all of the people that died, just the cost of doing business. Profit over people. That's what they care about. We cannot rely on that system.
The FDA officially said fifty thousand died. Others say five hundred thousand people died of Vioxx in the five years it was on the market, and it never should have been on the market. I left before it was even pulled from market. The shadiness that was going down was too much for me. The indoctrination starts early.
You guys know this. 200 Harvard Med students said, get pharma out of our education. Get them out of our professors' offices. Get them out of our curriculum. Pharma has ghostwriters.
I have a friend in New York City who does it, who writes curriculum for medical schools. They write the textbooks. And you know what Harvard did? Absolutely nothing. We have to save ourselves.
What about research? Everybody says, oh, Brandy, but there are studies backing up vaccines. Who funds them? Who funds them? Pharma funds 75% of pharmaceutical drug studies.
They fund pretty much all of the vaccine studies, either through the NIH or through a foundation, through the CDC. They're biased. But don't believe me. Believe doctor Richard Horton. He's the current editor in chief of The Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals.
He even says, today, perhaps half of scientific literature is simply untrue. Why? Because of conflicts of interest, small study samples biased. Did you know that pharma can stop a study that gets negative results and not even tell the FDA? They did it with Vioxx because it's legal.
What about the FDA? They're here to protect us. Right? They're the regulatory agency. They protect us from dangerous chemicals in the food, in water, in drugs.
Right? Do you know who was just put to head the FDA? Doctor. Califf? Has anyone heard about this?
This right here is a scandal. Even the New York Times said his drug ties are scaring people. He is the ultimate pharmaceutical industry insider. Conflict of interest section declaring financial support from 20 biotech and pharmaceutical companies, and he's heading the regulatory agency. His famous quote, regulation disrupts innovation.
Does that scare anyone? Because that scares me. The CDC, Center for Disease Control, is just as bad. Julie Gerberding, she ran the CDC for for seventy eight years. She doubled the vaccine schedule.
The childhood vaccine schedule was doubled in her tenure. Guess what? She got a really good reward. She went ahead Merck's global vaccine division worth $5,000,000,000. 2 months into it, she cashed in 3,000,000 in stock options.
Pharmaceutical industry, you guys know this. They create customers, cradle to grave customers. But us adults, you know, we're already on a ton of meds. Where's the real money? It's in the kids, and it's in vaccines.
Because they have created so many diseases and disorders, they're running out. They're running out of ways to make us more sick, but they can create vaccines for all of those diseases they've already created. We have a highly profitable product because the safety testing isn't as rigorous as a normal pharmaceutical drug. The gold standard is double blind, placebo based, long term study, and that just isn't done with vaccines because they're classified in a different way as a public health measure, and they haven't been tested in combination with other vaccines. Yet doctors give six to nine doses per visit.
It's insane. If pharmaceutical drug was tested like this, it wouldn't be on the market. But because it's a vaccine and the safety testing is less rigorous, our children are being experimented on. The prescription drug market is saturated. It's full.
It's overly competitive. You have six to eight, ten drugs per disease state. There's not a lot of room. There's not a lot of market there. And it's full of liability, the 6,000,000,000 that was paid out after Vioxx.
They can't create creating diseases and drugs and all of that. But what a brilliant market strategy to go into vaccines. That's where they're heading next for profit. And every single person in here is just another customer. And if you think they aren't gonna get you, just wait.
I'm gonna show you how they plan to. How are they doing on their quest to keep us sick? These are some shocking numbers. One in every three men will die, one in every four women of cancer. One in twelve women now have an autoimmune disorder.
I see it in my friends, in their thirties, lupus, arthritis, gut issues, IBS, Crohn's disease. I got IBS right after a hep b round. I had hives, and I got arrhythmia.
Speaker 4: Opdivo can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. This may happen anytime during or after treatment has ended and may become serious and lead to death. See your doctor right away if you experience new or worsening cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, diarrhea, severe stomach pain or tenderness, severe nausea or vomiting, extreme fatigue, constipation, excessive thirst or urine, swollen ankles, loss of appetite, rash, itching, headache, confusion, hallucinations, muscle or joint pain, flushing, fever, or weakness, as this may keep these problems from becoming more serious. These are not all the possible side effects of Opdivo. Tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and flu All
Speaker 3: of these things on here, they're considered side effects of vaccines. Have you seen the vaccine inserts? I don't make this stuff up. There are thousands of studies showing the links between vaccines and the toxins and these issues that we're seeing. It's not just the vaccines, but they're a part of it.
Speaker 1: So I asked about the Federal Advisory Council. I found it interesting that I just read an article, today that nine new appointed members of the council, all previous employees of Pfizer. I mean, I talk about it all the time in in government how we have so much of the fox guarding the henhouse. I mean, if that doesn't I mean, that is I don't I don't even understand how this is happening. God bless Rand Paul for point senator Paul for pointing all that out.
So, you know, we talk we talked last time or actually, I think it was our very first our very first hearing. I find I find information like this, you know, inserts for the vaccine. Paper's there, and there's nothing printed on it. I find that very interesting, disheartening, disgusting, and lots of other words, but then it gets better. It just keeps wait.
There's more. It just keeps happening. The CDC redacts every single word of a 48 page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. So I asked research to print the study for me. 48 pages.
The entire thing is redacted. What good does a study do if there's nothing there? Then I wanna know, wait, what might have been there that they needed to redact it? That's even scarier.
Speaker 5: We're witnessing an active cover up of a colossal consumer product safety debacle that is is basically affecting the entire world.
Speaker 3: Sixty million have allergies. Thirty million have asthma. These are all autoimmune disorders. Do you know my friends in Europe? They're like, Brandy, what do you mean you can't bring peanuts to your son's school because of allergies?
Like, who's allergic to food? That doesn't make sense. You're allergic to food and to air, hay fever. Right? Wild animals who aren't a part of our medical system don't get vaccinated.
Do they have asthma? Do they have hay fever? Are they allergic to food? Are they allergic to air? What is normal in our country should never be normal.
This is not normal, and we shouldn't accept it as normal. The US has some of the highest rates of chronic illness. All of these, dementia, Alzheimer's, they're all skyrocketing. One in three people have a chronic disorder or issue. Is anyone paying attention?
I know a lot of us in here are pretty darn healthy because we know this stuff, But we're the ones who have to get out there on the front lines and connect the dots for everyone who doesn't see this, who doesn't get it. That's our job, our role. Our kids are even worse off. One in six kids have a developmental delay. Speech therapy, occupational therapy is one of the biggest growing career opportunities right now.
One in seven have asthma. One in fifteen have seizure disorders. Do you know what happens after vaccines now? Children are going to the ER with seizures, they're being told it's normal.
Speaker 6: Lauren Kane's seizures began two hours after her shot. The US vaccine court said the vaccine was the cause. It's okay. It's Her injuries were profound and eventually claimed her life.
Speaker 3: Parents are being told that febrile seizures are normal. That is not normal. And those are the lucky ones that make it to the ER. We have ten thousand babies dying of SIDS every year within days of vaccines.
Speaker 7: Shelley Walker made this 911 call September 15 after finding her four month old son Vance in his crib unresponsive and limp.
Speaker 3: Your baby is not breathing. Blood
Speaker 7: crusted under his eyes and a dark foam coming from his mouth onto the teddy bear blanket lying beside him.
Speaker 3: He's so cold. Please dear God, what's taking him so long?
Speaker 7: Medics arrived on scene minutes later and rushed Vance to Kootenai Medical Center. And I
Speaker 2: had knelt down and I yelled into his ear, I said Vance don't you quit, don't you give up on me, you fight. And at that point when I looked up, the doctor was shaking his head like that and said that
Speaker 7: Vance was gone and that he'd been gone for several hours. Shelley says she immediately thought of the vaccines Vance received just two days before. And at that point,
Speaker 2: I don't know if they had picked him up and handed him to me. I just know that I had him in my arms and I held him up and I said he was so big and strong and healthy. Was this the damn vaccines? Was this the vaccines?
Speaker 7: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says no. An autopsy marks the cause of death for Vance Walker, sudden infant death syndrome.
Speaker 8: The bottom line is still that we do not know what causes SIDS, and the other bottom line a number of studies is that vaccines are not the culprit.
Speaker 7: And several independent scientific reviews from governments around the world claim the same thing. Still, it's hard for some to believe considering Vance wasn't the only one. In all, three North Idaho infants would die of SIDS, all baby boys, all in a two month span, and all within one week of getting their four month vaccinations.
Speaker 3: This is the first generation of kids that is sicker than their parents, and experts say they will not outlive them. What is going on? I'll tell you. Medical science has made such tremendous progress that there is hardly a healthy human left. In the Mayo Clinic, cancer is a mutation of genes after birth.
It is not genetic. Don't let anyone play that little argument with you. After birth, due most often to environmental toxins, chemicals, smoking, pollution, radiation. Autoimmune disorders, mostly due to environmental factors, same thing. We're poisoning ourselves.
And there are a lot of things that are part of this picture. The air we breathe, the food we eat. We're under a toxic soup, and we have to control whatever exposures we can and minimize it. And you know what? Vaccines are a part of that.
Vaccines contain those same chemicals that we don't want to breathe in. The formaldehyde that we you know, in the Chinese wood flooring. Did you hear about that? Yeah. Don't get wood floors from China, guys, because it off gases formaldehyde, and that causes cancer according to EPA.
But don't talk about it in vaccines.
Speaker 5: Vaccines are really the one thing we have looked at as causing autism.
Speaker 9: Yeah. Agree with you. Is completely bogus. That is such a bogus statement. How many vaccines have they looked at in these studies?
How many? What's the answer? It's two. How many ingredients have they studied of 35? What's the answer?
It's one. You've looked at two of 36 shots and one of 35 vaccines, and you're gonna stand on the stage and say that vaccines and autism are unrelated. It is the most bogus tobacco science. It's a smokescreen. Anybody who takes the time to read it would agree.
We are so frustrated by not being heard. We are so tired of not being heard, and we're so tired of hearing, doctors like the second doctor there who says it's been proven that vaccines and autism are unrelated. It's simply untrue, and it's maddening as a parent.
Speaker 3: Injection versus ingestion. This is so critical. We have to get people to understand this. Those same chemicals that are in the food and the water, flint, all of this, formaldehyde, aluminum, heavy metals, lead, all of that. In vaccines.
Why is nobody talking about this? To me, that's crazy. Why aren't we talking about this? And I hope after this talk, you will talk about it. Because we need to.
Somebody needs to. Because we're our health has taken a nosedive, and pharma's gonna keep pounding us. They aren't done. So my eyes are wide open. Right?
Sold Vioxx, saw how corrupt the health care system is, how pharma is. Then I went to live in Europe for eight years, and I saw what health is, what real health is. And I realized we have a sick care system. We're just treating symptoms. That's not health.
Our health care system doesn't care about our health. They profit off us making of keeping us sick. So lived in Holland, had my son over there, natural birth, at home with midwives. They didn't even wanna talk about vaccines with me. They asked, hey.
Vaccines. You wanna talk about it? I said, he's perfectly healthy. Why would I wanna talk about vaccines? They go, good.
We don't want to either. Yes. Come back to San Francisco. Six Months old. My son is totally vaccine free.
I go to a baby visit, but let's call it what it is. Right? It's a vaccine visit. I mean, 75% of their money off the baby visits? Vaccines.
That's how pediatricians make their money. That's why you don't see very many of them up here on this stage. Vaccine visit. Doctor goes, oh, he needs 15 vaccines. You need to catch him up.
And I said, he's pretty darn healthy. I think I'm gonna pass on those. And he's like, oh, trust me. And I'm like, I used to work for Merck. I know not to trust you.
And I know and I know that I'm not trusting you with my research. I wanna do my own. I wanna see some inserts. He got all red in the face and like, and he walked out. Right?
Nurse comes in. She's like, we'll see you in two months. And I'm like, you're not seeing me ever again. Are kidding me? Son has never been back.
Perfectly healthy. No allergies. No asthma. No vaccines. No chronic issues.
We have play dates, and they're like, what can he eat? What? What do you mean? That's not normal. That's not normal.
We cannot accept this. Fight back.
Speaker 0: In 1987, there was an MMR vaccine that was being used in Canada produced by Smith Cline Beecham, and that vaccine caused meningitis. It was quickly recognized, and that vaccine was withdrawn. However, in the same month that it was withdrawn in Ontario, it was licensed in The UK. The name was simply changed from Trivirix to Pluzirix. In The UK, it was used for four years, and likewise, it caused meningitis and had to be rapidly withdrawn.
It was a public outcry. There was an acute loss of confidence by the public and vaccine policymakers, and the vaccine should, at that point, have been destroyed. But it wasn't. It was then shipped to developing countries like Brazil where it was used in a mass vaccination campaign and again resulted in an epidemic of meningitis, which was entirely predictable.
Speaker 3: I started studying vaccines after that visit, and what I saw was far worse, far more shocking than anything I saw with Vioxx. Are vaccines about health? Really? Well, don't trust a lot that the World Health Organization says, but I love this slide because it talks about vaccines as a business. A new engine for growth, a new engine for profit.
And look at these numbers. These numbers, we've already trumped this. It's gonna be worth a hundred billion by 02/2018, not 02/2025. These these numbers are three years old. We're gonna trump these numbers.
So when a health organization shows a slide like this, don't you kinda wonder, like, are they really focused on health, or are they focused on business?
Speaker 10: You've invested $10,000,000,000 in vaccinations over the last two decades, you figured out the return on investment for that, and it kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math?
Speaker 11: You know, we see a a phenomenal track record. It's been a hundred billion overall that the world's put in. Our foundation is a bit more than 10,000,000,000, but we feel there's been over a 20 to one return. So if you just look at the economic benefits, that's a pretty strong number compared to anything else.
Speaker 3: Read this slide. If you take anything away from this talk, it will be one thing. Vaccines have never been proven safe ever, ever. When I was a pharma rep, the gold standard for safety testing was double blind, placebo based, long term studies. Without that, you could not get a pharma drug on the market.
Vaccines are not classified as a prescription drug. They're classified as a blood and biological product. The testing they undergo is substandard, very low. They don't even put placebo against the vaccine. They put the vaccine against another vaccine and say, oh, well, they killed the same amount of people, and they harmed the same amount of people.
Therefore, it must be safe. The FDA goes, rubber stamp. Thanks for coming. Here you go.
Speaker 12: It used to be one in ten thousand, and now it's one in more than two hundred and fifty kids that are being damaged in this country that are autistic. Now those kids are gonna grow up. They aren't gonna die. It's not like a lot of diseases where they get infected and they drop dead. They're gonna live to be 50, 60 years old.
Now who do you think is gonna take care of them? It's gonna be us, all of us, the taxpayers. And it's going to cost, I think, you said, miss Maloney, trillions of dollars. So we can't let the pharmaceutical companies and our government cover this mess up today because it ain't gonna go away. And it's gonna cost the taxpayers trillions more if we wait around on it.
And for our FDA and HHS and the health agencies to continue to hide behind this facade that there have been studies that conclusively prove otherwise is just wrong too.
Speaker 3: And you know what? They are never gonna be safe. Don't fall for that safer vaccines. They will never be made safe because there's no liability. Nineteen eighty six, the federal government gave pharmaceutical companies complete lawsuit protection for vaccines.
No liability. Only one of two industries in the whole US that's protected federally because the supreme court said they're unavoidably unsafe. They are not safe and they never will be. And you know what? After that law passed, this is what the schedule did.
Tripled. So if you ever hear anyone say, oh, you know what? I'm fine, and I'm vaccinated. If they're over the age of five, not relevant. It's a totally different story this day.
And when you hear that, be like, oh, you got 72 vaccines? They'll be like, no. Of course not. Then you're not vaccinated. The immune system's not mature.
Why so many so early? We're giving six to nine doses. There's no combination studies. No brain blood barrier. We are poisoning our children.
Do you know what's in that needle? You guys do. Your chiropractors. Aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, MSG, polysorbate eighty linked to infertility. Guess what's a big business these days?
The last one nobody likes to hear about. Right? Foreign human and animal DNA. But I'm gonna go there because I'm taking on pharma. So why would I not go there?
Why would I sugarcoat it? Where do you think Planned Parenthood's selling all those babies? Yeah. And where are the churches? Aluminum.
The top one on here. No neurotoxin. It's linked to breast cancer through traditional deodorant. Right? Pharma's laughing at us because they have a vaccine for breast cancer that they're developing.
Guess what the adjuvant is? Aluminum. They're blatantly laughing at us. Holy smokes. We need to be out there screaming this from the rooftop.
Oh, but everyone says, but immunity, brandy, vaccine saved us. Immunity does not occur from the arm. You cannot bypass the natural immune system and inject it in inject things into the arm and have immunity. It does not create real immunity. Temporary rise in antibodies, which can last, you know, months to years.
Antibodies, not real immunity. You cannot bypass the immune system and expect real immunity. It also bypasses the detox system, and that's why we're seeing so much damage, so much sickness. But don't believe a lot that the CDC says, but this is a really great report that's probably gonna be pulled off the website tomorrow. The CDC credits chlorinated water for the reduction in infectious disease.
Chlorinated water, not vaccines. That's pharma. That's pharma spinning it. Number two killer in The US in 1900, the year 1900, tuberculosis. Cholera was in there too.
Pneumonia, no vaccine programs. So if vaccines were really saving us, we'd all be dead. The best defense against disease, a healthy, strong immune system, not overloaded with toxins from food, from water, from air. And this is what everyone in here needs to get everyone they know to understand. They have to mandate them, but they're not they're starting with the mandates for kids, but that's not what they're looking at.
They're looking at that eighty five percent of adults that according to the CDC are not up to date on their vaccines, unvaccinated. Boosters are just the same vaccine. It's one size fits all. That eighty five percent, every single one in this room is where pharma wants to get their next profit. But we don't like shots.
Right? So they start with the kids because parents are used to giving shots to kids, and kids can be restrained and forced. So they start with the kids, with mandating the kids first so it'll look normal to mandate adults later. Adult immunization program. Healthy People 2020.
They wanted all adults vaccinated with 130 vaccines over the course of a lifetime by 2020. They're a little bit behind in that schedule, but not far. And they're not stopping with that. There are almost 300 vaccines in development. Everybody says, but, Brandy, you know what?
They are not getting that needle towards me. They're not gonna get me. And I'm like, do you have health insurance? And they're like, yeah. Of course.
You have to have health insurance. It's mandated. Boom. Then they're gonna get you. So everyone in here that thinks that homeschooling is gonna save you, that thinks that a medical exemption is gonna save you, that thinks that I don't have kids.
I'm fine. My kids are older. I'm fine. Wrong. That's what they want you to think so you'll stop fighting.
They are coming after every single one of us. And it's up to every single one of us in here to do something about it.
Speaker 13: This is experimental biowarfare on the people. They have not been approved.
Speaker 2: Guess what? We're coming for all the marginal seats. You're finished. I hope you've had fun. You need to start looking for another job because you're done.
Speaker 4: Simultaneous rallies happened in other cities including Adelaide where Dan Andrews was front and center, then Brisbane's Botanic Gardens, and in Sydney's Hyde Park.
Speaker 9: The system is broken in so many ways. Each and every one of you has to stand up in whatever capacity you can.
Speaker 3: 95% of people innately know that they aren't that needles aren't good for us. We see a needle come near us and we shrink away. So that other 5%, they work for pharma. Not even bother with them. Ninety five percent, they need someone to connect the dots.
That's up to us. We need to paint sane, educated faces to those who question vaccines. We need to get rid of the stigma. And we need to talk about risk because nobody will fight for their rights if they don't know there's a risk. We all wear seat belts.
Right? Why? We'll just let there be a law that we have to do something in our own property on our own body because there's no perceived risk. If we don't talk about risk, nobody will fight. And Merck used to tell us 10 to 12 times people have to hear something before they'll change their mindset, before they'll question it.
But on that fifteenth time, you've got them. So every time I hear, but people aren't listening, Brandy. Yes, they are. We just have to keep repeating, repeating, repeating, repeating. And it has to come from different sources.
Can't come from one person. That's why I created a campaign with billboards. I created it with bus stop boards, Facebook posts, grassroots effort. We're launching grassroot local groups everywhere. This is how we do it.
And you know what? They may have the money, but we have the truth. We have the truth, and we have the people, and we have the passion, and we have the power.
Speaker 14: Journalists, stand up. Be brave. Be brave. All of you doctors that know the truth, you're seeing these children injured. You tell me off of camera, I know vaccines are causing autism, but I won't say it in front of camera.
Be brave. Stand up. Now is the time for every actor here in Hollywood not vaccinating your child, hiding, being quiet, worried about your career. Stand up. Be brave.
Be brave, America. Fight. Our democracy is hanging in the balance. Our health is hanging in the balance. Our children are being sold to the pharmaceutical industry.
We are being enslaved.
Speaker 3: In one year, Learn the Risk has done 20 billboards. We've reached 15,000,000 people with views, three bus stop boards with over 4,000,000 views. That's 20,000,000 people. We need to make it 300,000,000 times 15. Facebook weekly reach of a million.
Tens of thousands on the website. 10 booths at health oriented events, major rallies, protests. And you know what? The media's watching. If you're loud enough, the media will talk about it.
But we haven't been loud enough and we haven't given them anything to talk about. The momentum is growing but I need every single one in here to help be a part of that army. Make a difference. Please. Don't look back ten years from now and think, damn, I wish I would listen to Brandy more.
I wish I would have done something. I never knew it would get this bad. Because that's where we're headed. And I see it because I worked in pharma. I know exactly what they're doing.
Please listen. Because nobody ever thought s p two seven seven would pass either, and it did. Don't look back in ten years and regret you didn't do more. We need voices. Time.
Use your time. Use your money. Use your voice. Be a part of this army. Please, now, we don't have time today.
Don't expect someone else to do it for you. Because every child, every family that has experienced life altering situation because of vaccines, everyone who has died, it's for them, and it's to save everyone else from that, and that includes your families and your friends. You have no idea who is gonna be affected negatively. Please, do it now. Please be the change you wanna see in the world.
Please do this. The future of this humanity and this world is counting on us. And we already haven't won if we fight. Please be the change. Thank you.
So I'm making this video today to describe the intimidation tactics that have been used against me to try and silence me. The first one happened when I was coming back from the capital, a rally in Sacramento against SB two seven seven. We're not going away.
Speaker 2: We're not going away. We're not going away.
Speaker 3: And I came home with a friend to my hide a key being on my on my doorstep, open to the key. And the story behind this was a year ago when I bought my house, I hid that deep in the bushes. And six months, ago, I had looked for it because I thought, well, probably not a good idea to have a key to my house outside my right outside my door. I couldn't find it, but when I came back from Sacramento that one time, it was about two months ago, that the key was on my doorstep, open to the key. That day, I had my locks changed and I called an alarm service.
And I installed a $3,000 alarm system two days later. So what happened, apparently, is someone opened the door, the front door, went through the front door, picked the lock, and my alarm went off. And they immediately disarmed it with the master code, which nobody had but me. I made sure nobody else had that code, And they disarmed it at the panel with that code. Panel's inside.
According to the alarm company, at 03:45 in the morning, somebody entered in through the front door. The alarm went off. They disabled the alarm by putting in the master code right away into the panel. And then at 03:46 in the in the morning, my hallway monitor sensor went off. So someone went down the hall.
And then at 03:48, someone opened my dining room window and then closed it right away. And then if you notice, the dining room window actually faces out towards the backyard, which is much more private than the front door, which they used to enter that time. And then they went over to the keypad, entered the code again, and then left through the front door at 03:49. After the incident, I talked to some security experts who have actually done intimidation for corporations, And they explained a few things. They said, well, a, they were probably tapping your place.
So everything I say and do in here is listened to, if not watched. And then opening of the back window because it's a much more private way to get in for future reference, for future visits. When I did return home and the the police came in and made sure nobody was here, and then I came in after the alarm was set off after the break in. And what I did notice was they had left the this window unlocked like this. And before I left, for Sacramento, all of the windows and doors were locked, double locked actually.
I went through twice to make sure that they were locked. So after that happened, I didn't really feel comfortable sleeping in my house again because, of course, they could come in and disarm my alarm whenever they wanted. There wasn't really another way to secure, the system. I changed the code, but again, who knows how they got the code in the first place. The security expert is pretty convinced that the house is tapped, my phone is is being listened to, my conversation, my text messages, and then my computer, all both my computers as well.
The next thing that happened actually was with my computer. So one of the things that the police wanted to know was if anything was taken in the break in. Of course, nothing was because they weren't here to take anything. I did have a computer here in a hiding spot. And when, the police were here, I did actually come and look to make sure the computer was still here.
And it's, here above the microwave is the hiding spot. It's not a place anyone would know to look for the computer, and it's not, you know, especially in being here in only four minutes. Two days later after that happened, after the break in happened, I walked into my place to move some stuff out, and the computer was taken from its hiding place and put in the middle of the floor. And so I came back home to pick up some stuff. I wasn't staying here any longer.
And that message was there, which was obviously very scary because clearly somebody had been listening in, if not watching where as where the computer was. So after that, I decided that it would be best to get out of town, and I left town for a couple of weeks and really went off the grid for part of good part of that. So after the computer incident and leaving town for two weeks, the day that I came back, I had a friend come with me, and him and I arrived at my place and found a ladder open right in front of my door looking into the windows, the bedroom window. Now this is my ladder, but this ladder lives in the garage. So it was clear that somebody had accessed the garage, brought out the ladder through the side of my house, opened it, looking right up into the window, and this happens to be the only window that I had blinds open.
So that was quite a message. The security experts said, wow. What a better message than than to say we're watching you. And this actually happened the day that I came back into town. So they clearly knew that well, it happened the night before.
They clearly knew when I was coming back. The neighbor who was feeding my dogs came over after half an hour after we found the ladder, and she's like she asked, so what's with the ladder? And I said, I don't know. I mean, I didn't put it there. And she said, well, it wasn't there yesterday.
So it means that it happened the night before I came back into town after two weeks. So clearly, they are watching. The next incident was just two days later, and that's in the garage. This Buddha was on the floor. Normally, the Buddha is pretty heavy.
It was on here on top of the the dog cage, holding the towel, to cover it up at night for the dogs. So it was taken off of here, and there's really no way it could have fallen because, I mean, it's actually really heavy, and if it had fallen, it would have fallen, you know, some different way. But I walked in, and I found it right there on the ground. The pictures were also knocked over. So then two days later, I noticed it burst through the kitchen window, and it's not something I have ever seen before, but there is a duck on my table.
And when I talked to the security experts, I said, I don't understand the duck. And then it came to me that I had been on my phone having a lot of conversations about people asking me, you know, are you staying at your house? What are you gonna do? And I use the term repeatedly, well, I I'm not staying at my house. I feel like a sitting duck because they can get in at any time.
And, you know, I'm a sitting duck. And so that was actually quite disturbing to come home to. Now I have a duck. I have never seen it before. It's not mine.
Nobody else is having access that would bring a duck. It just it's a clear message that, again, they are watching me. And the intimidation is quite, you know, intimidating, and it's quite scary. So after all of these intimidation tactics, it's very hard to feel safe and secure, but I am not gonna go away. I mean, I'm not gonna be silenced because these are important issues, and we need to expose what's really going on behind the mandatory vaccination bills.
It has nothing to do with public health. It has everything to do with profit. And I hope that we can all continue this fight. It's a long we may have lost the battle, but we still have a war to win. And hopefully by documenting this intimidation, they won't be able to get away with it in the future with me and with anyone else who speaks out.
There is some evil going on here.
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
They don’t want you to See this .. https://t.co/pzbWKPiVbj
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's vaccine court conceded that vaccines may have helped trigger Hannah Polling's autism. Dr. John Polling, a neurologist and Hannah's father, stated that the Department of Health and Human Services conceded that his daughter's medical problems, including autism, encephalopathy, and seizures, were brought on by vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may remember nine year old Hannah Polling. Recently, the government's so called vaccine court conceded her family's claim that vaccines may have helped trigger Hannah's autism. Our chief medical correspondent doctor Sanjay Gupta is back with more on that debate on this autism awareness Day. Sanjay? Don, thank you.
Speaker 1: We are here with Doctor. John Polling. He is, first of all, he's a neurologist. He's also the father of Hannah Polling, as you just mentioned. Her her autism her her case of autism diagnosis was conceded by the federal government as having been contributed to by vaccines.
That was a pretty startling thing, I think, for a lot of people to hear. We talked to a lot of experts about this. They say, look, vaccines in no way cause autism. You're a neurologist. You're also the father of Hannah.
What do you say?
Speaker 2: Well, I think you bring up a really important point is that the government, actually the Department of Health and Human Services conceded that my daughter's medical problems, are autism, encephalopathy, seizures were brought on by vaccination.
@TheOfficial1984 - 1984
The censorship they put on this video is insane. So I'm going to keep posting it. https://t.co/aopTNImRcI
@rustyrockets - Russell Brand
There’s a documentary on Pizzagate that’s been scrubbed from nearly every major social media platform. Our team managed to track it down, and after watching and discussing it in depth, we were left stunned. https://t.co/NwZcDcjqMg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss child abuse, missing children, and related cultural issues. One speaker notes skepticism is warranted when interpreting coded language in alleged abuse cases. There is agreement that child trafficking is a serious issue that warrants investigation, and it is questioned why films like "Sound of Freedom" faced resistance.
The speakers explore the reasons why child abuse might be covered up, including shame and the desire to protect families and friends. The conversation shifts to the pervasiveness of shame in society, particularly around sexuality, and how this vulnerability can be exploited.
They touch on the normalization and commodification of sex in culture, including drag shows and the sexualization of children, and question whether these trends are spiritually harmful. One speaker suggests that a lack of sacredness around sex can lead to exploitation and a focus on self-worship, aligning with a broader, potentially occult, agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The code words in the emails, there's no possible way of definitively knowing that they're used in the context of pedophilia. Sure. They might seem like they're used in odd contexts at time, but really, it's nothing more than just speculation, and sometimes not even good speculation at that. Like the one where Tony says to John he'd love to get a pizza for an hour.
Speaker 1: This is when I thought, oh, this is a good documentary because he's being critical and skeptical about it. Because, like, the problem I have is, and the truth is, because I feel personally offended, wounded, attacked by the establishment, I, on some level, want the worst things to be true. I want to find out that Kyuss Talmud did this, Barack Obama did that, but that's a stupid motivation, and it's petty. Really, what we should be interested in is the true nature of power. And if there are genuine victims of wide scale exploitation, then we should discover why that's not being investigated properly.
I would just mention this point that The UK refused to do inquiry into those rape gangs and into other matters that relate to child abuse. And, definitely, the stuff in the eighties and nineties around child abuse got hushed up. And, definitely, the Jimmy Savile story was webbed into networks of power in ways that were obfuscated and shut down. Furthermore, when we look at something like, Tim Tebow on Sean Ryan, he's talking about just evidence of child trafficking and the child trafficking stories in Sound of Freedom. Remember, Sound of Freedom, they try to shut that movie down.
Like, why is that? I I remember, like, just thinking, why is that controversial? I mean, obviously, it's true. You know, trafficking children is controversial, but making a film out of it, why is that not exactly the sort of thing that the liberal left are, like, embracing and really getting behind? I don't know.
But and that doesn't mean that all these people are involved in this stuff, but it means it's worth investigating. And it's certainly what I like about the person that's making this documentary is they're moving past the exciting frivolous bit that we're like, that you know how these campaigns work when you're running misinformation campaigns is, you know, you have, like, the people come on news, there's a scandal called Pizzagate now. This is misinformation. Well, this is the very reason we need to control the Internet because of misinformation like this. And then you look at it and go, come on.
What is the testimony of all these people? What where what's going on with that? Where is it all coming from? Sure. There are broken people out there, and I happen to know personally there are ways of manipulating people into believing stuff and thinking stuff because, obviously, it's the peculiar position I find myself in.
But you do have to take extremely seriously the testimony of anybody that's been through exploitation and abuse, particularly if it's not being investigated or covered, and that's where I think this gets, right, interesting.
Speaker 2: I can't believe we don't hear enough, like, anything about, like, children going missing and stuff. Yeah. It doesn't seem like it's something I used to hear about in, like, the eighties and nineties, and then you got the big ones like Madeline McCann, people like that that go missing. But if there's that big of a problem, and I believe there is, why is it never really being spoken everywhere. And then when something comes out which talks about it, it get take it down, you know, and then Sound of Freedom.
So I saw that movie. It's a really well made movie, not like, you know, set in the world of ways, but it was good and it made you think, oh, you gotta, you know It raises awareness for it. Raises awareness of that kind of stuff, which is I don't know why they had a big problem with it. Think part of it was the the way they funded it, and it was going against the Hollywood machine, but certainly a lot of it was to do because it was seen as like it's right wing to care about the abuse of children you don't That's right wing somehow, but we should all do Freedom is right wing now, quite frankly. Which is a big part
Speaker 1: of it,
Speaker 3: I think with child abuse too, a lot of times it's like it's somebody that they knew. It's like a close family member or a friend that lived down the street. And so instead of exposing it because it makes the family who is connected as a friend look bad, they cover it up. That's how it used to be like in the nineties and AM, it's still quite
Speaker 2: an embarrassment factor.
Speaker 3: Yeah. So like, they knew it happened instead of exposing it because it came back on them and made it look bad, they covered it up, which makes me think all of this is connected to people that it will come back and make them look bad. Whether they were involved with it or that they knew about it, it's still gonna come back on them and look bad. They're covered.
Speaker 1: Very interesting to talk about the power of shame because even I sometimes felt during the Epstein the ongoing Epstein scandal that in a way, everywhere is a kind of Epstein island. Even if you're not participating in the kind of coercive activity that's alleged to have taken place on that island, how do you feel personally about pornography? How do you feel about sex work OnlyFans or the sort of normalization of, commodifying sex? And I think that there's a sort of a pervasive shame kind of every everyone's in this kind of state of shame. Now at the highest level, that means people are vulnerable to blackmail.
Mhmm. But at social level, I think that a lot of us have participated in things that are lauded by the cult culture and commodified by the culture, but actually are spiritually not good things. Like that's what I felt when we were watching that White Lotus thing. Yeah. Yeah, actually.
Speaker 2: Well, about sexuality in our culture is because we'd never really speak about it, especially in England and obviously in America, like violence on TV but sex is like an issue. It's an icky thing to talk about even like you say in a consensual marriage, like to think about your parents, the most important sexual relationship that's ever existed for all this is our parents to think about it like, whereas it should be the at least the most important thing to you that's ever happened right? So when talking about children, like talking about non consent and talking about children, it's just that horrible for people. I think a part of this is that people just don't even want to talk about it, just like they didn't, a lot of people probably didn't wanna talk about what Savile was doing.
Speaker 3: Yeah. You know?
Speaker 1: So we can't get into all that, it's just sort of a bit weird. And I think it's about I was thinking then about sacralization and making things profane. There's a really good Rick and Morty episode actually where they do a sort of a they mimic inception or parody inception and go through layers of consciousness. And there's sort of one moment when they're in hell somewhere where they're like, there's some awful sort of sex party going on, which, by the way, isn't it weird how that kind of sex is getting elevated by the culture? So drag shows, children at drag shows, dressing kids up, sexualizing kids, weird, diffuse campaigns to normalize sex with children that seems sort of very peculiar.
These are edgeland things. I'm not suggesting that's a mainstream trope to normalize sex with children, but it's one of the topics and subjects that's come up. And in that episode of Rick and Morty, there's a bit where, like, when they're going back through the inception levels, they of cure. Sex is sacred. And cure.
Like, is supposed to be sacred. Sex isn't supposed to be a game, Latoya. And speaking of someone that turns sex into a leisure activity, on a spiritual level, I can really see how the situation that I find myself in has played out even within consensual action because spiritually, I was in a liminal space. And the culture wants us in liminal spaces. If you have a sort of a bond to Christ or a bond to God and there are things that you just will not do, that you won't do, that you won't treat sex as a kind of sex as an activity, pleasure as an end point.
If you recognize what your role is, and that's where it starts to get occultist. That's when I start to say, oh, yeah. You would make sex into a kind of transactional thing if at the heart of your mentality was this organised evil intelligence that wants to make the whole world their principality, like it says in Ephesians, or the prince of the world as Christ refers to him as, where everything becomes about if you worship another thing, if you worship food or sex, really you're worshiping yourself. You're worshiping your small s self, and that's how you end up in the the dominion of evil, the the dominion of the four.
@MYLUNCHBREAK_ - MY LUNCH BREAK
The Truth is locked away and Off Limits to the public. It's time to expose this to the world. Link to our Channel: https://youtu.be/FCRy2TLsy04 https://t.co/IeW3Lz4jmq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: We have made a lot of episodes, a 106 to this point, for a long time after today. This will be the episode that I referred to as the end of the mainstream narrative. An episode that we have built up to for a very long time. Welcome to 2025. I believe this is the perfect time to share this information with the world.
So here we go. I asked their AI database, the AI ChatGPT, if there were any archaeological finds that have been removed from the public, removing evidence of a previous civilization that was here where we live today. The answer is shocking. Yes. There have been numerous instances where archaeological finds are removed from the public.
All of us. Where statement number six is the final straw for the mainstream narrative. A narrative that is taught to all of us since day one. A narrative that is being taught in children's classrooms in every country stating controversial finds, items that could challenge established historical narratives, the mainstream narrative. These items might also be kept from public display doing this to avoid controversy or debate.
For any mainstream historian, this is the end. And for any archaeologist, you are now exposed. And this is just the beginning today. In fact, it's just the beginning of a massive series that we are starting right now as we speak. I'm going to be referring back to this episode time and time again.
And to this point in all of our episodes, I have never needed to read something more. This page in their book, will be the end of the story that we're all told and the beginning of free thinking, the beginning of finding the truth, stating, advocates argue that the public access to such artifacts is essential for a fuller understanding of our true history and for fostering critical thinking about the truth. Our world's true history, suppressing giants with some findings in The Americas that suggest advanced civilizations existed just like we've talked about before European contact, such as evidence of complex urban planning where the mainstream narrative, the mainstream archaeology dismisses it, which contributes to these artifacts that have been found not being displayed or discussed, hiding artifacts that would expose an advanced previous civilization, hiding them simply because it goes against the mainstream narrative is exactly what we're being told. This highlights the tension between advancing knowledge, exactly what doing here, or sticking with the existing power structure in academia and society as we evolve this knowledge, exactly like we're doing right here on this channel. There may be a shift towards greater public access to the items found that are being hidden from all of us to this day.
And I say that this is the beginning because we are now starting this series where we're gonna expose the sites, the items that are currently being blocked off from the public, blocking them off, hiding them from all of us in attempt that has been very successful for a long time to keep their false narrative in place. How many times to this point when going back and watching the first 106 episodes have we heard off limits to the public due to preservation or to keep looters away? How many times? This is the nod. This is the key, and we now know this.
We've seen this in episode 98 where access to the physical artifacts may be restricted to ensure their preservation. We've seen it in episode 102, where it is no longer being exhibited to the public. We've seen so many examples of this. And today, it couldn't be any clearer, any more straightforward that so much of what we are told in life is controlled. It's manipulated to fit the narrative that we are all given, and we are about to take this to another level.
Episode 86, when we saw that the project is supported by National Agency of Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia. The AFCP has allocated more than $1,000,000 to preserve and protect. This is a moment where our eyes open up even further, and we are able to see with more clarity than ever before. And once you're able to see, you will never go back, understanding that preservation protecting in the world of archaeology. This means preserving and protecting themselves, their narrative.
This does not mean that they are preserving or protecting what they have found, and I wanna make that very clear. And this is fully exposed now. The blindfold has been ripped off, and there's no going back. This show is a progression. It takes time to show people the truth.
There is a buildup, a process. The episodes are in order for a reason. The AFCP, an initiative by the United States Department of State just starting up in 2001. What a year. A group that the people of America fund through their tax dollars.
A group that the world did not need in the eighteen or nineteen hundreds. And I wonder why. Now, again, I just wanna clarify, and I don't wanna be sarcastic at all. This group is amazing. We all know that they really are preserving and protecting all of our favorite sites.
They support projects in over a 130 countries, preserving tangible and intangible cultural heritage such as historic structures, archaeological sites, and traditional crafts. They restore ancient temples and mosques. Conservation of manuscripts from the old world, textiles, and old world music. Preservation of significant landscapes. They are for sure doing all of this.
Jebel Barkal and the sites of the Nappatun region, Sudan, where the AFCP has funded conservation efforts at this UNESCO World Heritage Site.
And we know this group very well, which includes temples, palaces, and pyramids from the old world. You've gotta ask, why are there so many groups that aim to supposedly preserve and protect sites that don't fit into the mainstream narrative that the exact same group publishes into the textbooks. And then they also fund the operation of teaching this narrative, the same narrative that they just wrote, all to the people at a young age in every single country. I believe that we have correctly translated their language. The words preserve, protect, and conservation, preserving and protecting their narrative is exactly what this means.
And this unlocks so many more sites, so many old world places that is going to take this research so much further than we could have ever imagined. It will unlock places that have been hiding for so long. Without our sponsors, without our Patreons, without every subscriber, all of our badge members, and everybody who likes the episodes, This episode wouldn't be happening right now. This show, these episodes, it all honestly would have ended a long time ago. I appreciate all of you.
And instead of ending this show a long time ago, because of all of you, we are now just getting started. Welcome to episode 107 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Have you ever wondered what happened to the legendary Chuck Norris?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have made a lot of episodes, a 106 to this point, for a long time after today. This will be the episode that I referred to as the end of the mainstream narrative. An episode that we have built up to for a very long time. Welcome to 2025. I believe this is the perfect time to share this information with the world.
So here we go. I asked their AI database, the AI ChatGPT, if there were any archaeological finds that have been removed from the public, removing evidence of a previous civilization that was here where we live today. The answer is shocking. Yes. There have been numerous instances where archaeological finds are removed from the public.
All of us. Where statement number six is the final straw for the mainstream narrative. A narrative that is taught to all of us since day one. A narrative that is being taught in children's classrooms in every country stating controversial finds, items that could challenge established historical narratives, the mainstream narrative. These items might also be kept from public display doing this to avoid controversy or debate.
For any mainstream historian, this is the end. And for any archaeologist, you are now exposed. And this is just the beginning today. In fact, it's just the beginning of a massive series that we are starting right now as we speak. I'm going to be referring back to this episode time and time again.
And to this point in all of our episodes, I have never needed to read something more. This page in their book, will be the end of the story that we're all told and the beginning of free thinking, the beginning of finding the truth, stating, advocates argue that the public access to such artifacts is essential for a fuller understanding of our true history and for fostering critical thinking about the truth. Our world's true history, suppressing giants with some findings in The Americas that suggest advanced civilizations existed just like we've talked about before European contact, such as evidence of complex urban planning where the mainstream narrative, the mainstream archaeology dismisses it, which contributes to these artifacts that have been found not being displayed or discussed, hiding artifacts that would expose an advanced previous civilization, hiding them simply because it goes against the mainstream narrative is exactly what we're being told. This highlights the tension between advancing knowledge, exactly what doing here, or sticking with the existing power structure in academia and society as we evolve this knowledge, exactly like we're doing right here on this channel. There may be a shift towards greater public access to the items found that are being hidden from all of us to this day.
And I say that this is the beginning because we are now starting this series where we're gonna expose the sites, the items that are currently being blocked off from the public, blocking them off, hiding them from all of us in attempt that has been very successful for a long time to keep their false narrative in place. How many times to this point when going back and watching the first 106 episodes have we heard off limits to the public due to preservation or to keep looters away? How many times? This is the nod. This is the key, and we now know this.
We've seen this in episode 98 where access to the physical artifacts may be restricted to ensure their preservation. We've seen it in episode 102, where it is no longer being exhibited to the public. We've seen so many examples of this. And today, it couldn't be any clearer, any more straightforward that so much of what we are told in life is controlled. It's manipulated to fit the narrative that we are all given, and we are about to take this to another level.
Episode 86, when we saw that the project is supported by National Agency of Cultural Heritage Preservation of Georgia. The AFCP has allocated more than $1,000,000 to preserve and protect the mainstream narrative is exactly what I'm reading right now. This is a moment where our eyes open up even further, and we are able to see with more clarity than ever before. And once you're able to see, you will never go back, understanding that preservation protecting in the world of archaeology. This means preserving and protecting themselves, their narrative.
This does not mean that they are preserving or protecting what they have found, and I wanna make that very clear. And this is fully exposed now. The blindfold has been ripped off, and there's no going back. This show is a progression. It takes time to show people the truth.
There is a buildup, a process. The episodes are in order for a reason. The AFCP, an initiative by the United States Department of State just starting up in 2001. What a year. A group that the people of America fund through their tax dollars.
A group that the world did not need in the eighteen or nineteen hundreds. And I wonder why. Now, again, I just wanna clarify, and I don't wanna be sarcastic at all. This group is amazing. We all know that they really are preserving and protecting all of our favorite sites.
They support projects in over a 130 countries, preserving tangible and intangible cultural heritage such as historic structures, archaeological sites, and traditional crafts. They restore ancient temples and mosques. Conservation of manuscripts from the old world, textiles, and old world music. Preservation of significant landscapes. They are for sure doing all of this.
Right. I know a few people that don't think that they're helping any of these places. In fact, it's the opposite. And I have to say that I know these people very well. Jebel Barkal and the sites of the Nappatun region, Sudan, where the AFCP has funded conservation efforts at this UNESCO World Heritage Site.
And we know this group very well, which includes temples, palaces, and pyramids from the old world. You've gotta ask, why are there so many groups that aim to supposedly preserve and protect sites that don't fit into the mainstream narrative that the exact same group publishes into the textbooks. And then they also fund the operation of teaching this narrative, the same narrative that they just wrote, all to the people at a young age in every single country. I believe that we have correctly translated their language. The words preserve, protect, and conservation, preserving and protecting their narrative is exactly what this means.
And this unlocks so many more sites, so many old world places that is going to take this research so much further than we could have ever imagined. It will unlock places that have been hiding for so long. Without our sponsors, without our Patreons, without every subscriber, all of our badge members, and everybody who likes the episodes, This episode wouldn't be happening right now. This show, these episodes, it all honestly would have ended a long time ago. I appreciate all of you.
And instead of ending this show a long time ago, because of all of you, we are now just getting started. Welcome to episode 107 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Have you ever wondered what happened to the legendary Chuck Norris?
I recently saw a video he just made. I was shocked. He's in his eighties and still kicking butt and working out and staying active. What's even more shocking is he's stronger, can work out longer, and then has plenty of energy left for his grandkids. He did this by just making one change.
He says he still feels like he's in his fifties. His wife even started doing this one thing too, and she's never felt better. She says that she feels ten years younger. Her body looks leaner, and she has energy all day. Chuck made a special video that explains everything.
Make sure you watch it by going to chuckdefense.com/lunch or just by clicking the link below this video. It's gonna change the way you think about your health. I promise. Once again, that's chuckdefense.com/lunch. Click on the link in the description below to watch the video now.
You will not believe how simple this is. Just a reminder, the legendary Chuck Norris is a whopping 84 years old and yet has more energy than me. He discovered he could create dramatic changes to his health simply by focusing on three things that sabotage our bodies as we age. Watch this method by clicking the link in the description box below. Chuckdefense.com/lunch.
Alright. Let's be real. There's a food you're probably eating right now that's killing your testosterone, draining your energy, and wrecking your focus. And the crazy part? This food is advertised as healthy.
Tons of guys are eating it every day because they think it's gonna help them burn fat and build muscle. But here's the shocking truth. It's doing the exact opposite. Even if you only eat this food once in a while, it's enough to devastate your testosterone, leaving you feeling weaker, more unmotivated, and struggling in the gym, at work. And trust me, it's not just your age or genetics holding you back.
It's this one unexpected food. Here's the thing. This food is so common that most guys don't even realize how much damage it's causing. But there's a simple way to avoid it, and our friends over at V Shred have created a powerful video that reveals exactly what this healthy food is and how cutting it out can transform your whole body, helping you build muscle, lose fat, and boost your energy. So if you want to know what this testosterone killing food is and how to avoid it, head over to sculpnation.commlb.
Again, that's sculpnation.com/mlb to watch the video or click on the link below in the description. This could be the game changer you've been looking for. Trust me. You won't wanna miss this. And I wanna thank all of our sponsors over on Patreon.
Thank you to flatearthdave.com. You can check out his app, the flat earth sun, moon, and zodiac app. I'll put the link right in the description, and you can use my referral code, MLV. If you click the Tartaria button, you'll see the my lunch break playlist right here. The app is awesome.
Thank you to Rebecca Kay, the Lady Lacey Show, David and Sherry Ferguson, Edwin Johnson, Chuck Templeton, Joy Lee, Stephanie Nolan, the Burlesons, Suez KC, Edwin Rice, Helmut, Charles Krueger, Don Gaston, Dan Woodall, Dale, DJ Click Track, Edward and Brianna, Jacob Law, Jim Ribley and Christine Duggan, Kyle Glascock, pktfnews.org, Ben Drizano, Natalie Shippenoff, Amberson EMC, HK Sue, Melissa Edgar, Biggles, Clayton Lamar, Wiltas Homestead, John Adams, Robert Zozzolins, Phoenix Art, The Arnolds, Attila Power, VKH Bonner, Bell's Clarions for God, Forbidding Gecko Love, Justin Grobner Grubb, Leah Strong, Dakota Dunn, Eric Martinez, Ivan Apocaly, Jim Bro, Eggard t shirts dot com, Meta, Jason Hockburn, Marie c, valleymedicinals.com. Kyle Logan. Alina and Chris, the IT guy. Michael Dingyu, Patriot Armory. Tom O'Hara.
Michael D Connor. C three s c o b. Ancient tallow. Jeffrey Temple, sonyadane.com, James Alvin, Baqsuli, Jason Press, Suki Warrior, We The People, Migs, miss Rexes Murphy, Mark Chapman, Muji and Declan, Ariana Oates, Jenica Joyce, Nathan Berba, Ski, Ko Drenth, The Sovereign, Beacon of Truth, Liberty's Arborist, Thomas Thorpe Peterson, Zinger Coffee and Tea, Natasha C, Kay Moore, dublinmcgregor.com, Miss Fox, Diamond Jewel, David Rauschenbach, Emily Marilyn, Felipe, Curious Cat, Mike D, etcetera, Dan McGee, Laurie Hedvig Johnson, Terry, coffee, Ellie Annie, Ivan Apocaly, Seth Crago, Dee Woods, Glenn Gunderson, Mousey's Mouse Cheese Records, James Vincent, Robert's Brain Is Gone, Extreme Reality check, Anna and Marley Valdez, Wayne t, late for dinner, Juana Carcamo, Paolo Goncalves, g Power, papa one, Jesse De Leon, Blake, Rick Tapke, ducks, MDF, TFB, Billy Prater, William Richard Jeffries of Fifth, Fritz Tickle, Dax Bill Chekinson, Jetsky Chuck, Kim Lusada, Rod Way, Checkmate, Dylan Mugenburg, Leonard Insulaco, in weeks. Patriot, Doc Halo, Henry's mom, and Smerino, Shibba Shaba in the darkness.
You guys are all awesome and helping this channel out a lot. Jebel Barkal, a site that has been preserved and protected by the AFCP. And we all know why. The ruins include at least 13 temples. The temples were described for the first time in the eighteen twenties.
Again, our timeline. And never before this, with their drawings and their descriptions in 1821 twice, and in 1844, documenting and recording significant architectural details. These that the story story to them? How did they just disappear? Where you can see the depictions, of the tents of the times right here at the bottom, and then the pyramids in the background that they, of course, just found.
These are the finders of the eighteen hundreds, our brand new timeline. With the pyramids at this time still having their tops and not yet blown off by the gunpowder, blowing off the tops of the pyramids within the last two hundred years. What have we just found? Is this what they did in Egypt? What was the significance of the top of the pyramids?
Why destroy the top? What is a pyramid? Why did the old world have so many of them? This site, the one that we're able to see today, is still incredible. What's left at this location after the AFCP has gone in here and preserved and protected the mainstream narrative, they still have depictions of the past, the old world, with depictions showing that there were beings here that did not look like us, and we know this at this point, and a palace that has been melted, destroyed, and completely turned into dirt.
This whole area is mud and sand with some sort of event taking place that wiped out this previous civilization. It is very obvious that something happened. This is not just from weathering. And I'm sorry, but this is not naturally forming like we've been told. A 118 miles from this site, we also have the ancient kingdom of Kush with the AFCP conserving Kerma's treasures.
Conserving. Let's take this further. While the primary meaning of conserve is to protect, preserve, or maintain something, the word conserve can imply keeping something out of view or safeguarding it in a way that limits public access, giving the appearance of hiding. But we promise. We're just trying to keep it safe with examples being cultural artifacts.
Artifacts or treasures are often conserved in controlled environments like vaults, keeping old world items in vaults. Could you even imagine during trial saying that what they found is protected in a vault? And we promise it's just so the evidence is protected. We can't bring it into the room, but we swear they're there and we're hiding it. There's nothing to see, and they're protected.
Not putting them on public display. This is amazing. Environmental conservation to protect them from overexposure or human interference closed off to the public. All of us. Our eyes are gonna ruin it, and their eyes won't.
It makes total sense. No. Confidential or sensitive materials, historical documents or artifacts may be conserved in archives where access is limited for their protection. And I'm just gonna be honest. These are all excuses to not let us see the old world, our true history, items that would give it all away, that there was a previous civilization here before us, a massive, powerful, advanced group of people right here where we all live.
And their buildings, their structures remain for us to see today in every country, in every continent. We are not the most advanced civilization to ever be here. We are not evolving. This is nonsense, and we know this now. Technology has been here.
They were not constructing the Milan Cathedral with a chisel while riding around on a donkey. This story is nonsense, where they were struggling in winters, dirt roads, and couldn't find any food, not having a store to purchase shoes, and then going to the bathroom in their front lawn, and not having any toilet paper after they're done until we all show up and save the day in the eighteen hundreds. This narrative is done. It's over. Again, Kerma, located 118 miles away, again, in Sudan, and again, more melting, and, of course, containing over 30,000 individuals, the old world people.
And then they give us this stupid distraction word again, the pottery, saying they found the burials, especially with regards to material evidence such as pottery. We know that this is the indicator that they located more. They give us the pottery over and over suggesting they were primitive, sitting around making bowls, sitting around making teacups over and over and couldn't put their socks on by themselves. They needed our help more than anything, and we accepted that and never asked. What else did they find?
The first archaeological excavation at the site of Kerma was conducted 1913 and 1916, not 1740, not 1630, and not 1580. Once again, in the '18 or nineteen hundreds. Our timeline over and and over and over. This is the case. This place has been destroyed.
All in my opinion, but based on everything that we've seen. I believe that there are looters of these old world sites as well as destroyers, and I think they're the same group writing our history. Now we've seen what they're doing in Sudan. I wanna show that this is worldwide. I wanna show that the truth is being hidden from all of us, blocked off from the public.
When we travel to China and find the Terracotta Army, collection of over 8,000 soldiers that was just found in 1974 by a local farmer. And then, of course, just finding it in 1974, they are able to pin down the date of negative 02/2010 and negative 02/2009. This is insane at this point. And all of this is incredible, but not even close to the best part. Before we go on, let's take a minute and thank all of our batch members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber, and everybody who likes the episodes.
When you like and subscribe, I can see in real time the views go flying up and reach brand new people. I appreciate all of your support. We are on YouTube, Rumble, x, Instagram, TikTok, Rockfin, and Spotify. These episodes are in order for a reason. Are you ready?
For centuries, occasional reports mentioned pieces of terracotta figures and fragments of the necropolis. Again, the necropolis. Episode 105, again. Finding all of this while digging a well, the Terracotta Army is part of a much larger necropolis. Ground penetrating radar and core sampling have measured the area to be approximately 38 square miles.
Can you even imagine how many people from the old world are buried here? This is unbelievable. A massive 38 square mile site that we are told is a necropolis. What else is not being shown to us within these 38 square miles? And what does this site connect to underground?
Tunnels. Again, so many heads are removed where I believe there were beings here, individuals that do not look like us at all. Seven of them right here in the front without a head. Do you believe that that's an accident? This series is just getting started.
I cannot wait to share what we have found, telling us that they found rare animals, griffins, pits that formed the necropolis that lie within and outside of the walls surrounding the tomb mound with the Terracotta Army statues, each having a uniquely crafted facial feature, hairstyle, and armor detail. No two faces are alike, meaning that we know these were not molds. The previous civilization had tools and were incredibly advanced. The figures are life-sized, typically six feet six inches tall. Some of the men had massive bodies.
Again, giants, depictions of the past, massive individuals. They were all originally painted, but the paint came off after removing the mud surrounding the army, the mudflood, burying so much from the old world. And, of course, we are told that a grave pit was discovered and excavated in 2003. Just finding all of this with 121 skeletons retrieved, where they identify these people as the site workers, where we know that that's not true. And we also know that this is a necropolis.
They just told us this, and there are so many more people than just a 121 individuals across the 38 square miles. We know this. Most of the figures originally held real weapons, where the majority of these weapons were, of course, looted. Who looted these items? You tell me.
Or they just rotted away? Not a chance. This was removed from the scene before we all got to see the old world's weapons that don't fit into the narrative. What is really below our feet? I think we all know that the previous civilization is, and I'm guessing they still haven't found everything.
With the main tomb of China's Terracotta Army, we are told the First Emperor of China remains unopened. This tomb lies beneath a large mound at the heart of the burial complex. The necropolis that was just found in 1974 remains unopened. Why is this? I believe it's to, of course, preserve their narrative where experts fear that opening the tomb could expose that the mainstream history is a lie is exactly what I see.
Telling us that our technology just isn't advanced enough to open the tomb, where I believe that they have found text, tablets, like we have seen, that explain what's inside. I think they have technology that can see inside, or I think that maybe they've already been in there. And then we see that they have records describing the tomb, scaring all of us, saying that there is mercury in there. So it's way too hazardous to show to the world. They know what's inside.
They know that something has been found in the nineteen seventies that would expose it all, And I believe that it's inside of this tomb with these texts that we are told about stating, the tomb is said to be a grand underground palace filled with old world treasures, replicas of the empire, replicas of the previous civilization with some speculating that it might hold even more intricate artifacts than just the terracotta army. And I think that's exactly right. All off limits to the public, all of us, all to preserve the mainstream narrative. And this is just part one. We will be back with so much more.
I hope you all have a great rest of your day. See you.
@Whiplash437 - Whiplash347
Broadcast: EXPOSED This video has been deleted from every platform (including google) years ago. It took us a long time to find it. MAKE IT GO VIRAL‼️ https://t.co/yNPAhsapyn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the importance of the international order that has been built over generations. They suggest that ordinary individuals lack the ability to govern themselves effectively. They believe that true order and progress can only be achieved when individuals willingly give up their rights to a powerful sovereign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the international order that we have worked for generations to build. Ordinary men and women are too small minded to govern their own affairs. The order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all powerful sovereign, and for the
@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Britain's banned documentary - SILENCED https://t.co/HKIBPsuZTA
Video Transcript AI Summary
This documentary explores the weaponization and politicization of court buildings, focusing on the Royal Courts of Justice. The speaker, a journalist, shares his own experience of being silenced by a gagging order and criticizes the mainstream media for manipulating stories and pushing certain narratives. The video discusses a case involving two boys, Bailey and Jamal, and how the media portrayed their altercation. It questions the accountability of the media and the effectiveness of the legal system. The involvement of a jihadist lawyer and his connection to Antifa is highlighted, demonstrating biased reporting and a disregard for the truth. A man accuses journalist Mike Stitchbury and lawyer Mohammed Akanji of endangering his family and colluding with Antifa. He questions the integrity of the legal system and media, expressing concern for the safety of witnesses and his family. He calls for support in his legal battle, emphasizing the importance of free speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The documentary you're about to watch is the most important documentary I've ever made. This story is far bigger than Tommy Robinson. This is about the weaponization and the politicization of these buildings. Court buildings across the west. The Royal Courts of Justice, ironically named.
These buildings have been weaponized and used against members of the public to destroy them if they speak out. From Donald Trump to Steve Bannon, to Gert Wilders, to Marie Le Pen, to Katie Hopkins. That's what's happening. My job as a journalist, I stand for freedom of speech. I stand for freedom of press.
And I failed. Because 3 years ago, when I lost a court case in here, then they banked me to the tune of £1,600,000. On a documentary, you're gonna see the entire story was a lie. Okay? I failed because I should have come out of court and I should have played you that film.
Why didn't I play you that film? Because I was given a gagging order by this building, by this judge. I was silent and I allowed them to silence me because I was scared. I was scared of 2 years in prison. I was scared of the effect that solitary confinement for that length of time would have on me.
I was scared of jihadi gangs in jail and I was scared of the effect it would have on my family. I failed me and I failed you. I'm not gonna fail myself again. You're now gonna watch the best citizen journalism and the most incredible expose of the establishment you've ever seen. The news is how we find out what's happening in the world.
It's how we form our opinions. Opinions based on facts. That's the key. Facts. Facts should be delivered to you by journalists based on the truth.
But what if what they're delivering you isn't the truth? What if it's stories that are manipulated to make you think a certain way, to follow a certain narrative, different people's agendas? And what do they do to those who go against that mainstream narrative? Those who try to expose the truth. This is a documentary about the lengths they will go to to shut down and silence anyone from bringing you, the British public, the truth.
Alright. Smell me off. Obviously, not me.
Speaker 1: I lost my job over this. No. I'm just kidding this.
Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit.
Speaker 3: He's won the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it.
Speaker 2: Well, it's all very liberating.
Speaker 4: This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. I'm not
Speaker 5: standing.
Speaker 0: You're not going, but No. Because no. Because what yous are doing, I know what yous are doing.
Speaker 6: Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, aye. This is a documentary
Speaker 0: about the a documentary about the unholy alliance between the media, the justice system, and our politicians. How they conspire to suppress free speech, how they pervert democracy, and how the truth and your freedoms are just 2 of the casualties. We will show how the mainstream media deceives people, how they ignore the truth, how the lies of the virtue signalling, BBC, IT Fear, and Channel 4 are all about their poisonous agenda, no matter the cost to innocent people. It's also a documentary about how an everyday playground incident between 2 young lads was spun into global news at a terrible cost to so many people, not least the 2 young lads themselves. We will show how the law is being abused, how people driven by hateful ideologies attempt to intimidate and silence anyone who dares to challenge the so called progressive, so called liberal narrative.
We will show the foolishness of our fear driven political leaders who jumped on a story, took a side without knowing the truth, or worse still, knowing it but hiding it because the truth didn't fit their narrative regardless of the human cost. And we'll ask 3 important questions. Firstly, is the media accountable to anyone in any way for what they report? Years after the Levinson inquiry, has anything changed, or do they continue to act with impunity? Secondly, is our legal system still fit for purpose?
We will show how lawyers who hate Britain but love jihadi warriors have weaponized the law system against us and how the legal system really only works for the rich. And finally, how do we keep our politicians accountable? If the police, the cause, and the state can silence anyone for speaking inconvenient truths, truths that may raise questions about government policy? Is the UK any different from China, Russia, or Iran in their treatment of dissidents? And, of course, for Piers Morgan, for Jeremy Fine, for the BBC ITV, and channel 4, it's a tutorial on journalism.
Keep watching it. You'll learn. Our story appears to start and end in a brief playground incident at Ormondbury Community School in Huddersfield. A playground scuffle. One boy poured a bottle of water on another child.
The school dealt with it and that should have been that. 3 weeks later, however, a video clip of the incident surfaced and within hours, with the help of lawyers and the ignorant rant ins of ITV's Piers Morgan and the BBC's Jeremy Vine, it was made into global news event. And the lives of so many people were turned upside down. Such playground incidents happen every day. So why was this spat between 2 boys transformed into global news?
Well, one of the boys was white and the other a Syrian refugee, at which point the truth of the matter was buried beneath an avalanche of agendas and opportunism. Within hours, the race hate brigade was sharpening their blades.
Speaker 7: But clearly when somebody comes from Syria fleeing Assad's regime, coming to a place like this, when they get treated that way, that's an issue, and the whole world is looking at us.
Speaker 0: Where are we? We're in Almunbury. Do I say the scene of the incident? Is it a scene in it's the incident? It's the scene of the great lie.
I call it the great lie because this lie was pushed around the globe. Yeah? This here is the school where the world was told a Syrian refugee was waterboarded by a racist English bully. It was in a playing field here, and do you know what? This is the first time I've been here.
Because when this blew up on the news, it's a child's school. Kids are in school. I didn't come outside here. You see the scenes outside here where the imam was here with mobs of men. Yeah?
Mobs of Muslim men. Extremists traveled up from London such as Ali Dua to cause a scene outside this this kids' school. Anyway, but I'm here. Why am I here? I'm here because I faced a court case.
I'm being prosecuted. It's gone it's gone to the high court, and I have to prove I made a video stating that it was a lie, stating that Jamal wasn't innocent, and telling some facts about Jamal beating up girls, an instance that I've been warned about by the members of this community to tell the truth about what happened at this school. I've gotta prove it in court, so I've come to Huddersfield. I'm now gonna knock. I need to find witnesses.
I've got addresses for many. I need to knock and talk to them and see who I can get to come to court to help me prove to you, the public, this is about as much as proven in court as proving to you, the British public, that I was the only journalist in the country who told the truth about what happened in this community. The story you were told. You were told a vulnerable Syrian child refugee had been bullied and waterboarded by a nasty white boy. You were told it was a racist attack.
You were told of the dangers of Far Right extremism. You were invited to agree that this kind of intolerance could not be tolerated. Was he vulnerable? Was it a racist attack? Our evidence shows the answers to both these questions was no.
Was the Syrian lad waterboarded? Why was this word used? What about this? No. Was that waterboarding?
Take a look at this. It shows a group of non white children beating up a white girl. It went viral online, but it wasn't touched by the mainstream media. It wasn't made into a global story. Why not?
Meanwhile, the usual suspects had lit the fire and were gleefully stoking the flames.
Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution.
Speaker 0: And of course, the politicians. They're always quick to jump on the bandwagon. Theresa May, Sajid Javid, Naz Shah, Nicholas Soames, Winston Churchill's grandson. Such moral outrage. And it's not just the media and the politicians.
In today's Twitter and Facebook driven worlds where celebrities and groups compete to virtue signal, most of them driven by the warm feeling they get by expressing their moral outrage or by fear. The fear of what might happen to them if they don't. Everyone who's anyone pumped the Bailey Jamal story. Boxers, Lennox Lewis, Huddersfield Football Club, celebrities from across the globe. Let's have a look at all of the celebrities and Blue Tick Brigade who pumped the Jamal story.
And here are some of the people who pumped the story you watched earlier of the white girl getting beaten up. Sadly, whether it's politicians, celebrities, or other groups, None of them are wise enough or pause long enough to ask whether they have the whole story, to check the facts, to find the truth. But why let the truth get in the way of such a good story? And this story was just too good a story. 2 lads in a playground scrap is not international news, but racist white thug water boards helpless Syrian refugee.
Boom. Racism can't be tolerated. Beware of the far right. That's their kind of story. We'll hear more about the militant left later but they clearly weren't gonna miss out on this.
Speaker 7: Well, we well, representing might be too harsh a word, but I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm here as as a concerned citizen.
Speaker 0: Mohammed Amin Pandur, a Mufti on a mission. He rushed to Ulman Bire from his mosque in Bali, a town at the far end of the district. In fact, there's 40 mosques closer to this school. But perhaps Mufti Pandor had his own agenda. You see, his little brother, Councillor Shabir Pandor, is the leader of Kirkland East Councilman Huntsfield.
And they were having some pretty bad news days at that time. By the way, Mufti Pandor, he's the same guy who ordered the Islamic mob to come to the school in Batley and demand the second of the RE teacher who showed a cartoon of Mohammed in a discussion about free speech.
Speaker 7: Look look at what we do as a community, and you'll understand our stance. So what has happened is totally unacceptable. Yeah? And we have made sure that the school understands that. The teacher has been suspended.
The teacher has been suspended.
Speaker 0: You may recall the teacher had to flee, and he's still in hiding under police protection. Luckily, he hasn't ended up like Samuel Patti, the French teacher who's beheaded for having a similar discussion in a classroom about free speech. You see, free speech is essential for any society wishing to maintain intellectual and social progress, but not all societies are bothered about intellectual and social progress. Should we be silenced by the demands of Mufti Pandor and Sharia Law? Should we sacrifice our freedom of speech?
Should we sacrifice the free and open exchange of ideas? Should we sacrifice the cultural inheritance of which we are all custodians? But back to the bad news days in Kirklees and the playground incident in 2018. There was also Kirklees counselor, Masood Ahmed.
Speaker 9: I'm not aware of there's a problem at the school. That's something I obviously need to find out in terms of that there is a problem at this school, and that is something I will definitely be picking up.
Speaker 0: Now some of you may remember this.
Speaker 10: Michael, are you gonna explain what's gonna happen next? Right?
Speaker 0: Are you being arrested?
Speaker 7: You won't be arrested.
Speaker 0: I am being arrested.
Speaker 5: A breach of peace.
Speaker 0: I'm of course.
Speaker 5: Of the I'm of
Speaker 7: course a breach of peace.
Speaker 0: I'm being arrested. The content of what
Speaker 5: you're Can
Speaker 11: we just
Speaker 5: say streaming The content of what I'm streaming told. I'm being
Speaker 10: arrested for breach of peace. The game. I've been
Speaker 0: Can you
Speaker 12: just turn off your
Speaker 11: life, please? Yeah.
Speaker 5: Do you want to someone just What's that?
Speaker 11: Can you
Speaker 0: just explain it again? You want to
Speaker 13: rest in suspicion
Speaker 5: following the breach of the people?
Speaker 0: What what does that mean? What what does that mean? At the same time as this playground spat between 2 young lads, 20 Huddersfield men were being jailed across Yorkshire at Leeds Crown Court for what would be the biggest grooming gang Britain has ever seen. Ultimately, 35 almost exclusively Muslim men would be given 380 years in prison for grooming, trafficking, and raping young children, most of whom were known to counsely Pandora's Kirklees Council. Mufti Pandor traveled for half an hour to rabble rouse a gang outside the school gates over this playground incident.
When within a couple of mile radius in Batley, police have arrested a further 99 men in relation to historic sex crimes. So far 32 have been charged including 1 Ibrahim Pandor, 41 of Batley. That makes it the highest destination of grooming gang arrests anywhere in the UK. We Googled to see what Mufti Pandor has said about these grooming gang atrocities. Nothing.
We Googled to see what counsel and sued Ahmed's condemnation. Nothing. In fact we can't find the condemnation from the of these brother either, Councillor Shabir Pandor, leader of the council. Just one statement from him reported in June 2019, telling the National Working Group of Child Sexual Eratiation Response Unit that his authority had moved forward. That's it.
They've moved on. Never mind grooming gangs, gang rape of young children, all these men seem to be far more concerned about what happened in a playground at Ormerbury Community School or about cartoons of their prophet Mohammed. I think I now realize how difficult this is gonna be because everyone we've spoke to today,
Speaker 1: they're all confirming what I
Speaker 0: said was true. Everyone's confirming what Jamal was like, including school staff. But as soon as I mention this camera, as soon as I mention court, I need someone to come to court, they're just totally silent straight away. No. We no.
No one can have said that. No one can have said this. You jump in. It's raining. But I'm realizing how difficult it's gonna be but I have got an idea for that now after today.
So but first stop, McDonald's. Yeah? Let's go to McDonald's because I'm starving. It's been a long day.
Speaker 13: Yeah. I'll see you on a YouTube.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: Nice to
Speaker 13: see you.
Speaker 0: Smaller in real life. Nice to see you.
Speaker 5: Nice to meet
Speaker 0: you, mate.
Speaker 13: Carry off on your drink.
Speaker 0: No. I'm fine. Thank you. Cheers, though. You're good.
Yeah. Thanks, man. Oh, man. Very nice to see you. Oh, thank you, bro.
Hello?
Speaker 2: Steve, how
Speaker 0: are you, mate? It's Tommy. How
Speaker 11: are you?
Speaker 0: I'm good, mate. Doing good. Bro, mate, have you still got all those hidden cameras?
Speaker 5: Yeah. Of course, I have. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Could I borrow them? You need Yeah. But when I say borrow them, can I borrow I'm gonna need to take them for weeks because I've got so much to do? It's a long story. I'll explain when I see you.
But, I'm in a bit of a situation. I need some hidden cameras.
Speaker 5: This is not a problem. I have put some kit together for you.
Speaker 0: That's it. So that's the idea. The idea is I've got a friend there, secret Steve, who has all sorts of cameras, yeah. He's a he's a private investigator. I need to show the public everything I've heard today.
I need the public to hear and know the truth. I need them to know how much they've been lied to by the media about what happened in this town. And, the only way, unfortunately, the only way I'm gonna be able to do that is with hidden cameras. Because today, I've heard the truth, but I need everyone of you to know the truth, and everyone's too scared. That's why I said Project Fear.
Everyone is too scared to speak the truth or to come to court. So I'm gonna end up getting I'm gonna end up getting hammered in court. The whole world told I've lied when I haven't. I was the only journalist in the UK who told the truth. So we need to prove it.
So we'll shoot down the motorway now. We'll go get these hidden cameras. These are all so this is a tie. There's a camera in that. That's the camera.
Mad, isn't it? There's a camera there. You've got everything here. Cameras, glasses. I don't wear glasses.
That's gonna be awkward. That's the bottom of a cup coffee cup. So you put that on the bottom of the coffee cup. I feel like James Bond. This today, that's the camera.
I'll have to take this off, but it doesn't matter because apparently this records all the audio, records everything. That's the camera and I feel a little bit dirty doing this. But it is the only way I'm gonna get people to speak. And then I need you to hear what I hear.
Speaker 1: The idea that people would move over the streets looking for him was appalling. The fact that the video itself, although it showed the accumulation of things that built up to that, did not deserve what happened to him or to anybody else in that situation. We knew that I'm afraid the media, I call it a perfect storm. I was getting, emails from Pakistan, from Australia, from America telling me to resign. So it went worldwide, and I'm afraid I came into teaching to help poor people, and they got me today.
I've got a problem here. I lost my job over this. And as a result, the council has told me that I cannot speak to anybody ever about it. So unfortunately When you asked to go over to me about anything? I was there when it happened.
I was there when I dealt with all the situation. And then, Ofsted came, then Trevor wasn't there anymore. That's that's all I can say. Well, I can't get a job. So that's where it's left me.
And I can live with that, but barely only 15. I'm not with her. That's different.
Speaker 11: It's got a
Speaker 1: pretty good man. It's a young man with No. No. If I do,
Speaker 5: I think
Speaker 0: you get
Speaker 1: myself into
Speaker 11: real trouble. No. Okay.
Speaker 1: I thought really serious trouble. Legal trouble because partly cancels You signed an NDA or something? Correct. So they've said, you can't be split free. I'm not with the NDA so you keep the pension.
So you get pension? Yeah. Fucking hell, bro. I have to be very careful about what I say to it. I'm not allowed to talk about it.
I really am not. So I can't discuss it. I can't discuss it with the media. I always wanted to have my say against it, which I've never had, Never been allowed to have. Never be allowed to say goodbye to my staff.
They're just told to leave. So I've worked there nearly 30 years. Actually, 20 years and never got a card, never got a goodbye. This whole thing was just used. The whole thing was used.
Yes. Could push him in over there. And hijacked and by by by the right of it politic I'm quite a political person by the right and the left. It was hijacked and spun all out of the position and now we've got problems. That's interesting.
What? I thought she looked 1 more meters of all the silence. What a mess. It is a it is a mess, but but it's a tragedy. It's a tragedy for Bailey.
I'm not sure, Jamar, will get anything out of this ever in his life, positive out of it either. Necessarily, might have he might have got a few, silver coins from Julius, but that's about it. You know, that that's it. The thing is that they haven't 6 weeks, prior or weeks prior. And then in the same day at the same time, if you look for the to go fund me up, the site was released.
Yeah. Now you see your full picture together?
Speaker 0: Already, that's gold. Yeah. I know that's gold. All I hope, I hope that's recorded. I can't turn a computer on.
So I just pray that's got the audio and the visual and it's not pointing up there that we've got it because that was the head teacher and that's the first visit. And I know this is gonna work. So I now need I know just off that, I didn't think he'd talk before he shut the door on my face. He didn't. He seemed like he wanted to talk.
There's a lot he wants to say. So but, yeah, let's go. Next stretch. Yeah? It's exciting.
Was there a racism problem in the school and
Speaker 5: Well, no. I don't I don't I don't think there was.
Speaker 0: What about other Syrian refugees? Like, do you think what happened to Jamal in the school was because he was a Syrian refugee?
Speaker 5: No. Not at all. I told you before That that would have happened
Speaker 1: No, ma'am.
Speaker 5: If the child was white, big, blue, whatever color.
Speaker 0: They're all scared.
Speaker 5: Yeah. A lot of careers on there. I work for operation service now.
Speaker 0: You do now?
Speaker 5: Yeah. So I don't know where I stand with it. If I go, I could lose the job.
Speaker 1: What about if
Speaker 0: you know, I don't want You
Speaker 5: know what someone said? I work
Speaker 0: I get it, bro.
Speaker 5: I work for probation service now. You see, if
Speaker 0: I didn't work for You see, if you're someone
Speaker 5: If I didn't if I didn't work for the fucking public sector no more, I'd say, god, they can go fuck themselves. They can't. You know what I mean?
Speaker 0: So they seem to be pretty keen on these NDAs.
Speaker 1: Who is that?
Speaker 5: That is counsel. But I can't disclose that with you. That's what? Lords. I'm saying I can't disclose it because I Yes.
Assigned it.
Speaker 1: That incident was talked about by Theresa May at a g twenty summit. He asked her a question about it. We were then offsteaded by 5 of the top inspectors in the country. We'd only send 1 registered inspector. We have the head of safeguarding.
We are I had a member speaking to me about it. If you want my opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shut that school. Get up there and get rid of this.
Speaker 0: Get rid of the problem.
Speaker 1: Over to the Bailey.
Speaker 0: Correct. Over to Mal.
Speaker 11: Correct. Get rid
Speaker 1: of the problem. Over to Mal. Correct. Get rid of the problem. Get rid of it.
But why do you think that is? Do you think because I'm not Jamal. Jamal, because he come here 2 years ago. I've got so many negative things said about it now for so many people. Well, I mean, so many.
You in a few before. We have non Syrian children. Non families. Yep. We're not one issue.
Speaker 0: Well, Well, my my view is
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: That you won't get much of an answer out of all because you work there and it's bound by various confidentiality. So
Speaker 1: Long disclosure of business.
Speaker 0: Do you get paid as well? Not been to me.
Speaker 1: They all have. Every teacher got paid not to tell the truth.
Speaker 0: But the head teacher can't even talk about Jamelle at all.
Speaker 2: No. No. They cannot.
Speaker 1: Both, can you? Shouldn't it?
Speaker 0: Well, if you work it out, it must be a good one.
Speaker 1: Mustn't it? Did
Speaker 0: you work
Speaker 1: there as well?
Speaker 2: No. I was the chair of goodness there. But so it's it's not What my issue
Speaker 0: is is
Speaker 2: you're not gonna get anywhere.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And Rob wouldn't talk to you either. So it's
Speaker 0: They're trying to
Speaker 12: It's pointless me even giving you I told but
Speaker 0: I told the truth. Your contact details Okay. Wouldn't work with us.
Speaker 1: I told the truth about
Speaker 0: what happened that day.
Speaker 10: I am not even arguing.
Speaker 1: His life was destroyed.
Speaker 2: Well, that's not fair either, is it?
Speaker 0: As a racist bully, and he won't. And he wasn't. I know. And
Speaker 2: I both know that.
Speaker 14: Truth is just
Speaker 1: How much money is it?
Speaker 5: I can't see the figure because if I see the figure, it goes out.
Speaker 1: Because, mate 18. 18.
Speaker 0: I've just found out. Well, the head teacher's told us already that he was blackmailed and threatened. I've just found out of Kumar. He was paid £18,000. Paid he said, I can't take I signed.
I I was paid. So paid what? He was paid money by the local council, so he can't tell the truth about what's going on in that school. Then they've they've give everyone non disclosure agreements from school staff to governors to and and Paul Coomar to get £18,000. He's not even involved.
If you live here, if you live in this area, your tax money he's got 18 grand what must the head teacher have got? He must have got 6 figures. How much money have they spent on this lie? We put in a freedom of information request to Kirklees Council to find out exactly how much they had spent of taxpayers' money to get the silence of their staff. They didn't answer the first request.
They avoided the second. Only when we sent them legal letters because they have to, by law, answer these questions, did we get our answer. They had spent over a quarter of £1,000,000. £275,000 of taxpayers' money was spent making people remain silent. But they've they've they've spent money silencing everybody, so no one can ever this is for ever, once you sign that agreement, no one can ever tell the truth While they push this manufactured lie that destroyed lives, schools, communities, everyone's life.
I've seen life after life after life, person after person's life destroyed, while the council, your local council, Kirkley's council, give away 100 of £1,000 to make sure that the truth can never be told. I can't believe it. I knew from day dot, I asked myself the question, when this was blowing up and I knew the truth, I kept saying, how come no teacher is telling the truth? If all those teachers know what's going on in that school, how come none of them are coming out and saying? Well, now we know.
Now the whole world's gonna know, because corporate council paid them not to. Unbelievable. Unbelievable. Jamal was in India?
Speaker 3: Yeah, he was in the same
Speaker 11: well. What was his what
Speaker 0: was Jamal's attitude about in school?
Speaker 3: He wasn't very nice. He called female teachers bitches. He just didn't really have respect for the female students, to be honest. Yeah. Basically, we were in a p lesson, and we were playing hockey with a teacher called Mr.
Cattell. And I had taken the hockey puck off of Jamal, because I was on the other team, and sent it to the other side of the room where my team mates were. And I then turned around and just felt a really sharp pain in my back, and he'd swung the hockey stick over his head and hit me in the spine with it.
Speaker 0: Is there do you think there's any way that could have been an accident?
Speaker 3: No. It knocked me to my knees.
Speaker 0: It knocked you to your knees. How how long have your mom been in school when this happened?
Speaker 3: About 2 weeks. I've had lasting injuries from it. It's caused me to have severe pain in my top in the top of my back and, I'm on medication for the pain.
Speaker 0: Still now?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Did
Speaker 0: Jamelle get in trouble for this?
Speaker 3: Not that I'm aware of.
Speaker 0: First, I wanna apologize to anyone I've been forced to record with a hidden camera. Sadly, people are terrified to tell the truth because of the potential consequences, but the truth still needs to be told.
Speaker 1: Do you know if you do remember of any any incident specifically with tomorrow with those?
Speaker 2: Well, do you remember that one there, it it got go with octetick, won't it?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Charlie.
Speaker 2: Charlie. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Don't get the name there. Yeah. You must go. Lovely little girl. Yeah.
Speaker 2: It just
Speaker 0: wrote to him
Speaker 2: of not sure to bloody nasty. No
Speaker 10: he was, like, to the side of me. So he tried, like, pushing me and, like, so I quickly moved out there because obviously I knew what he would like. He would have actually hit me and stuff. Mhmm. So I moved and then he, like, moved his arms if he were gonna try and stop my face, like, back.
Okay.
Speaker 0: And he dropped but he did, but on that day, he spat
Speaker 1: at you. What was on? Where'd the spit go?
Speaker 10: Like, literally, all on me and if I'm outside and all down the school bag. Because when I went home, I told mum and mum we were disgusted in it. But the school said that that because it was outside of school time, so can't really do much about
Speaker 5: it. Okay.
Speaker 2: He's a nasty little piece of shit.
Speaker 1: Was he?
Speaker 2: Yeah. And dad.
Speaker 1: 2.
Speaker 2: Everybody and anybody. It does it has no respect for women at all. None. Did he even snap? No response from
Speaker 11: him? No.
Speaker 2: I told I told his father to all this on phone.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 4: Jamal grabbed him by his tie and was just threw him against the wall, cracked his head up and he gets back at wall and just kept throwing against the wall. This kid was out unconscious already. That's just malicious. That's just intent to kill.
Speaker 1: Were they?
Speaker 10: They had, a young lad and a girl. And they were absolutely they were horrendous. The kids, they were just horrific. The the kids that they are, they used to bully the kids.
Speaker 1: Oh, Jamal. Yeah.
Speaker 0: See, what was
Speaker 11: what
Speaker 5: was Jamal like though? The dickhead.
Speaker 1: Was he?
Speaker 5: He spent he he came to isolation a few times. He want he want perfect child?
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 5: He was the same. Well, you know what Joe Biden did, don't you?
Speaker 0: He was in isolation? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: That's what he's in other times.
Speaker 0: Was he?
Speaker 11: Yeah. What
Speaker 1: was he like, though?
Speaker 5: Troublesome, Charles. Yeah. He's a makeup fucking star, he's
Speaker 0: He used to make up stories.
Speaker 5: Yeah. At at one stage, I think you see something to do with your sister. Somebody said something to his sister that I was in isolation. I just go come out and he was waiting outside isolation. I wanted to be the girl or for someone.
I can't can't remember.
Speaker 0: He want to be here. Yeah.
Speaker 5: They did ask someone to his sister. Just one second. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No problem.
Speaker 5: Yeah. No problem. Well, you you you you want you want he used to lie lie a lot.
Speaker 0: But this whole thing was built with what he said. And if you lied a lot, light, it's a big problem.
Speaker 1: What was that over?
Speaker 5: Him. Oh, no. It's whatever. Oh, no. It's whatever.
Or we want this or not. Did you
Speaker 0: like that with lots of kids? Not really. No. Just certain kids?
Speaker 11: Yeah. I would
Speaker 0: say I'm like, he's got an insurance group. So he thought he could? Yeah. Yeah. So he just randomly attacked you?
Yeah. Yeah. What about, your mom your mom just sank about he puts anything between his hands?
Speaker 15: Oh, yeah. It was a compass.
Speaker 16: I remembered it yesterday. It was just as you went.
Speaker 15: It was a compass. He got he got a compass, and he was going around like when
Speaker 0: he got to be
Speaker 15: with proper hearted to be able to be believed in everything. And I think it was miss Ennis that proper gave him a top telling off
Speaker 0: Okay. You know, you said so so say say like that instant there. You said some girl said something to my sister, and he walked away outside to beat her up. Well there are testimonies from several children who alleged they were being bullied by him. Younger children.
Little girls. Mostly girls. Is Jamal the innocent victim? You've been told. I gathered these testimonies over just a few hours filming in Huddersfield.
I could have carried on.
Speaker 5: Yeah. I was waiting outside my pleasure to be the yellow.
Speaker 0: And about the noise. Yeah.
Speaker 5: I'll say about Juwani used to tell fibs. There was several times he got investigated, and it just fucking turned out to be fucking lies.
Speaker 0: The fact he always lied is a big point. The fact that you know that the police the the school investigated incidents where he said things happened Yeah. And they turned out to be made up. Yeah.
Speaker 5: It was thieves. They couldn't have happened. It could happen because of of the one. The child were even in school that he accused.
Speaker 1: I can remember. Oh my god. Yeah. Oh my god.
Speaker 5: So I'm sure he accused us another guy called Jaden. I can't remember his last name.
Speaker 0: Called what?
Speaker 5: Jaden.
Speaker 0: Jaden.
Speaker 5: He accused he accused Jaden or someone. I'm a mean miss any investigative of complex.
Speaker 2: Not very likable, really.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 2: You know, about what we're gonna do to sisters and what have you bury aunt's office.
Speaker 1: I'm toddlers.
Speaker 2: But not a very nice boss.
Speaker 1: When you say what are
Speaker 0: you gonna do to your sisters?
Speaker 2: Well, I told Betty, wouldn't it?
Speaker 0: Tell Betty is your baby sister? Mhmm. Alright. And I'd
Speaker 1: try to argue that it was in the public's interest for them to know the truth about Jamelle.
Speaker 11: I know.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Unless they They were just retaliating. Yeah.
Speaker 2: You know, which most people know is from the side in the world's history.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Jamelle seems like every kid I spoke to that he attacked was younger.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Bullock.
Speaker 0: Jamelle. Hey, Jamelle. Yeah. Yes. That's what I'm fine now.
Yeah.
Speaker 5: That's what I remember. He said he would have stabbed him or something with a science or something. I remember. He said, yeah. So he goes to come and then what he's saying now.
Speaker 0: Because that thing of him getting caught with a knife in school. It's like, what? What with a knife
Speaker 1: and screwdriver? Bailey gets his tail thrown in
Speaker 0: a bottle of water.
Speaker 5: Yeah. What the fuck?
Speaker 0: Surely he gets
Speaker 5: a statement on that?
Speaker 0: No. Because it there's things missing.
Speaker 1: But I've got I've got his dad mentioned it in
Speaker 0: the minutes in the meeting. His dad mentioned it in the meeting with the school. His dad mentioned about them catching him with a knife and a screwdriver. His dad
Speaker 5: his dad bought it up. I've got it I've
Speaker 0: got it in black and white.
Speaker 5: Yeah. You got good case there?
Speaker 1: I've got
Speaker 0: I've got it. Yeah. He got caught with a knife. They they can't deny it. You see, the truth was there for the media.
It was there for celebrities and politicians to see. They could have told you the truth at the time before some of you gave over a £160,000 of your money to the poor victim, Jamal. Well, not so poor anymore. But none of this was true. A key part of this case is that I reported what I was told.
Before my involvement in this story, a mother went online and said her daughter had been attacked by Jamal. I contacted that mother. She sent me images of her daughter. She said her little daughter was beaten by 3 Muslim girls and that Jamal jumped in and bit her daughter on the head. She sent me the images of the bite marks on her daughter's head.
I said, can I speak to you? Can I interview you? I rang the mother, but the child was too scared to talk to me.
Speaker 2: Too scared?
Speaker 0: No. No. Everyone's scared. A girl went online and said that she had been attacked by Jamal. Both of these victims deleted their comments why.
Both of these victims had gone online and reported this before my involvement at all in this case. I simply reported what they were saying. We revisited the mother's house to try and get confirmation as to why she backtracked on the story she had put out and the story she had told me.
Speaker 10: I got car if you're driving. Tony Robinson's there.
Speaker 0: Tell her not to worry, don't worry.
Speaker 12: He said don't worry. Yeah.
Speaker 0: So when you when you put online about Jamelle, what what what happened? Like what did you What happened, what was the response to that?
Speaker 5: What do you mean?
Speaker 0: I mean, did you receive did you receive
Speaker 14: I don't receive threats. Yeah, I did.
Speaker 1: What sort
Speaker 0: of threats?
Speaker 5: We all thought. All thought. Don't let all thought. And I'm just
Speaker 0: because I'm trying to understand this. Is that, and is that because and it because what I've what I've looked at and then because Jamelle's solicitors are using a statement that you made saying that, Jamelle had nothing to do with it. But was that I'm asking is that was that in response to the re reflects your seat that you received?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: It was. Okay.
Speaker 5: Liar. Straight. Is this a symbol just a liar? Jamal telling fibs all the time. There's several times investigated.
Fucking who found out that he's talking fucking shit.
Speaker 11: I don't
Speaker 0: think the whole but then I read Jamal reading reading was slightly a prepared statement on the news.
Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules.
Speaker 18: He used to break rule
Speaker 5: all the time. Yeah. He used to lie. He used to lie a lot. He lied several times.
He lied he lied several times. I caught him several times lying.
Speaker 0: He's suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. And I'm finding out after teacher after teacher after teacher he's far worse than what I said. Far worse. I mean, like, far worse. He was put up on a pedestal by every single media outlet, politicians, footballers, celebrities, boxers, everybody.
They're suing me for defamation for what I've said about him. All I'm knocking on the door and asking teacher after teacher after teacher is what was Jamal like? And it's just flowing. It's just boom. And he was far worse than anything I said.
Far worse. I find it insane because no there is no way that all the things I'm now finding out, the neither journalists has found this out. They must have known what it was like because it hasn't been hard.
Speaker 10: The Isle of Portrait, Port Bailey, the the spin. He was
Speaker 1: and that Jamal was an innocent woman in London too. He wasn't.
Speaker 10: Not far from that.
Speaker 0: So you were told Bailey was a bully and he was a racist. He wasn't a saint in school, he'd be the 1st to admit that, but he wasn't a bully or a racist. Police concluded there was nothing racist about the scuffle, yet you were told he was vermin. You were told he needed to be dealt with. He was vilified by the media, by politicians, and by celebrities.
Bailey a bully, Bailey a racist. Not according to his teachers and other children. Not according to his head teacher of his school. Who is this? He was
Speaker 1: a 15 year old kid Yeah. And it it would have been, could be, have a great future. He's a very articulate lad. He's got a lot of issue about justice. Yeah.
I think, you know, I could've seen him in a row or something like like that because he has that in him. Really? Yeah. And he would stand up for his peers in school where he felt things were. Yeah.
Yeah.
Speaker 11: You know, he would do that. I just wanna tell the truth
Speaker 1: about Vaden. Well His life was destroyed.
Speaker 2: Well, that's not
Speaker 1: fair either, is it?
Speaker 2: As a racist bully, and he won.
Speaker 13: And he wasn't.
Speaker 0: I know. And I both
Speaker 1: know that. I know. Unfortunately, the
Speaker 0: truth is just I know. I know. But Bailey didn't even get to sit his GCSEs because of this campaign of hate, this perversion of the truth. What about Jamal's broken arm? Which the world was told was because of bullying.
That was a like. School incident reports record that he had been punching a much younger child in the face while holding him in a headlock, and he was pushed off him, fell, and broke his arm. The police considered the incident to have been dealt with it properly.
Speaker 5: You were picking you were picking I think you picked I've got an old somebody pushed him to get him off.
Speaker 10: He started calling me my white fat bitch and stuff, and then he like Is
Speaker 0: that what you're my mate?
Speaker 11: I'm a
Speaker 10: white fat bitch.
Speaker 0: White fat bitch.
Speaker 10: And then, I went up to him, and then he like, I took I took the bottle and then he put me in a headlock, and then my mate pushed him off me. And I believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock.
Speaker 11: And I
Speaker 0: believe that's how he broke his arm. Yeah. So he had you in a headlock? Yeah. So he he physically assaulted you?
Yeah.
Speaker 5: You said
Speaker 0: he called you mama white bitch.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Is
Speaker 0: that the sort of terminology he uses a lot? Yeah.
Speaker 1: There's all sorts of misconceptions like the fact that he had a broken arm.
Speaker 0: Oh, I've got 2 independent witnesses now.
Speaker 1: He he had a year 8 kid. And another kid in year 11 stepped in and said, what are you doing? Pushed him over. Poked him off.
Speaker 0: Who he had in the headlock?
Speaker 4: It was must have been just start of year 11, put this kid in a headlock. One of my friends, one of my friends, didn't like how he was behaving, grabbed him and just threw him off him. Like anyone do break up a fight, they just, like, throw him off him, but this wasn't a fight. This was an all out brawl, one-sided, completely one-sided, because this kid had no match against Jamal, just threw him off him and he landed on the curb.
Speaker 0: How did was he did? Jamal was in year 11?
Speaker 4: Yeah. Half half the size of Jamal, easily.
Speaker 0: Okay. You know, I know he was 12 and Jamal was 15. Mhmm.
Speaker 4: But he was like, kind of like half size ish, kind of like, up to shoulders kind of thing. Yeah. But he still had no match against him, And my friend just grabbed him, threw him off him, he landed on a curb, and that was like it.
Speaker 0: So I've read it reported in by Jeremy Biden and in the newspapers that that was an incident of Jamelle being bullied.
Speaker 4: No. Exact opposite. He was bullying this kid.
Speaker 1: So you see people thought that was all part of it.
Speaker 0: But that's do you know why somebody destroyed it
Speaker 1: for all your broken arm.
Speaker 0: But do you know why they
Speaker 11: do you know
Speaker 1: why they thought it was part of it?
Speaker 0: Because the solicitor said it was.
Speaker 1: No. Well, it's not it's not true. I'm telling you, it's not true. I could even name it I won't. But I could name the child in year 8 that he did it to.
Speaker 11: And I
Speaker 1: could name the child in year 11 that stepped in.
Speaker 0: So someone stepped in?
Speaker 1: Because basically, school school is a pretty good place. Kids have good values. So if you saw a bigger kid, you'd see a little kid. He said, oh, he stepped in and said, what are you doing? Yeah.
And we even had it where
Speaker 0: Do you know what he said to the year 8 kid? No. Called his mom on white slag?
Speaker 1: Yes. Now I've got that on camera, isn't it? Now you say it. Yes. He would have done that, and that would have been incredibly provocative for them.
Speaker 0: Even in his statement to court, Jamal claims they were forced to relocate from Huddersfield for their own safety to a different part of the country. Really? Because the records say there was no most racial motivation and there was no threat at home. That's what the records say. And this is why the authorities, they refused to move them.
And while all this was going on, records also show that his dad Jihad Yeah, his dad's name is Jihad. He'd threatened to kill himself if the rest of his family weren't brought in from Syria. It's not surprising that some authorities expressed concerns that Jihad Hijazi was trying to manipulate the system to get what he wanted, including their housing. You were not told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. You weren't told anything approaching the truth by the mainstream media.
And in Jihad's holy war statement to the court, Jihad said that he wished he had died in the war with his family, rather than go through what happened at Almanbury Community School. Really? He wished he was dead and all his family were dead rather than go through this school playground instant. Listen to the clip again. Listen to what Bailey's saying.
He's asking Jamal repeatedly. What are you saying now? It wasn't a random attack. It wasn't a racist attack. Bailey didn't threaten to stab Jamal.
The playground incident was not the beginning of the story. It was a culmination of many events. Not least, it was a response to Jamal's alleged threats to rape Bailey's younger sisters. They're about 9 years old at the time of this. So how's it going at that school when you saw the portrayal of what happened with Bailey and him.
Because he was painted as this innocent little kid.
Speaker 10: He was an innocent.
Speaker 11: He's out
Speaker 10: in there for a while. He's out in there. I used to see him bully Bailey's little sisters
Speaker 0: and stuff.
Speaker 8: Everybody was exposing the scumbag that did this, who I hope gets severe retribution. Hope his parents take action. Right? Never mind anything else. What what what what are you producing here with this vermin doing what he's doing here?
Speaker 16: That's not Britain. That's not what
Speaker 8: we do as a country.
Speaker 0: You can hear him there describe Bailey as vermin. Words are important when you're on a daytime platform and and people listen to what you say. What do you do to Vernon? You exterminate. You kill it.
Low life, called him a thug. But worst of all, he demanded severe retribution against this child. At the same time as this, Jeremy Vine was reporting. He didn't tell people the bully's name, although he was finding it hard not to name a child. Instead he told his followers where they could find that name.
Now this is a direct response of both of your reporting, because when you reported, you can follow the timeline and the repercussions of what that bore. What I've done here, in 2018 there's a charity called Tell Mama that records Muslim hate incidents. Even though they've been in the past penalised for exaggerating the figures, let's go, let's work off their figures. They say there are over a 1,000 hate instances with 325 of them being online. Some of them are Islamophobic, which means criticizing Islam as well.
Here, I've printed a piece of paper for each one of those hate incidents. 327 hate incidents online against the entire Muslim community of the UK in 2018. The 325 Islamophobic comments, they're the ones you read about on the news every day. They're the ones people are in jail for. They're the hate incidents the media keeps shoving down your throat.
So each piece of paper here represents a hate comment aimed at a child after a playground dispute. I want to read these now, and peers, you demanded severe retribution, that's what you demanded against this child. Let's see if you're happy with some of this. I pray someone rapes you and your whole family while you watch. Fuck your mother.
Fuck your love. The Syrians will rape your family. If I saw you, I would rape you to death. You'll be raped by the Volusian group. I hope your mother will not be racist when she is raped.
I'm going to bum your nan alive then dead her again. And the threats of rape, all of these threats of rape, imagine being these children, imagine being a 15 year old child living in Huddersfield with your little sisters. Muslim men are jailed in the biggest scandal in the history of our country for mass rapes in that town. And then you're receiving and you're reading these messages. You're going to die, you're going to fucking die, we're going to strangle your mum, your dad, your friends.
I'll kill your whole family. I can't wait to find you so I can slit your throat. You're the person who should be killed in those ISIS videos. You, your parents and your whole family have to be burned. Do heaven a favor of fucking off yourself.
Looking at you makes me want to commit suicide. Go commit suicide your your oxygen thief. Jump off a bridge bro. Do humans a favor and kill yourself. We don't want you and you don't belong in this world.
Again, imagine being that child reading them. Piers. Is that severe enough for you? This is a mental health record for Bailey McLaren. Bailey was referred to Luton CAMS by Luton and Dunstable Psychiatry Liaison on the 31st December 2018.
Reason patient involved in incident in Huddersfield and has been relocated to Luton with family. Patient unable to cope with not returning home and has taken an overdose. So this lie, this narrative, this agenda which comes before anything else by the politicians, by the media that was pumped. This child, it doesn't matter. His life didn't matter.
You know if he killed himself, no one would have cared. We wouldn't have heard condemnation from any of the politicians or from any of the media. No one cared. Because everyone from start to finish in this story is collateral damage so long as they have the narrative. And peers, you have a son, you have children.
Demanding severe retribution against a child for a school playground dispute is unforgivable. You sit there and you preach. You preach against us. You make your accusations against me. Never have I labelled Muslim children as vermin.
Never have I demanded my followers to commit severe retribution against anybody. And this is what the media, the politicians, and the celebrities created, aided and abetted by the left wing activism and the selective indignation of Islam. Hypocrites out there might say, who cares? That's what he deserved, right? Imagine for one moment if I had incited violence against young Muslim lad in the reversal of this situation.
And you see, in a district where a generation of young girls have been raped, these threats are far from empty. What do you think, if you were working in the school at that time, what do you think what the media done?
Speaker 5: I think the media fucking blew out of fucking proportion of what the fucking world body got off.
Speaker 0: I know. But in the media run that Jamal was being bullied,
Speaker 5: like You see, he used to complain that he used to be bullied. There was a there was another, I think, Kirklees Kirklees guy that came that Jamal that Jamal said somebody bought a knife or something? I think that that be that be that that should be on record. Yeah. Yeah.
I don't think when we we we we have to get I think it were a lot of bollocks.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm gathering that by reading the school records. They made accusations and then when they're investigated.
Speaker 5: Yeah. And there were a lot of bollocks. It lied.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Now ITV, Piers Morgan. You used your platform to incite hatred of a young child. No time for facts or the inconvenient truth. Surely you must have known the truth because within a few hours of the story breaking, I was receiving dozens of messages from parents, pupils and staff saying there was much more to the story than met the eye.
So I did what any journalist could have done, should have done. I asked questions. Were you just being lazy? Was it willful blindness? Or are you just incompetent peers?
And the BBC's Jeremy Vine, to you personally, was it clinical cowardice? After all, you didn't reveal the white boy's name. You just told everyone where to find it on Twitter. Were you afraid of being sued? Although it wouldn't have been the BBC licence fee payers picking up your legal bills, would it?
Or was this your Pontius Pilate moment? Condemning a child whilst washing your hands of any responsibility? Because that's what you did and you didn't seek the truth either. Piers, Jeremy, your lazy inept reporting was not without consequence as we will see. You incited hatred, you succeeded.
And that's contempt. Your actions, not Bailey's, led to Bailey and his family being driven from their home in the middle of the night. Like the very refugees you claim you care about. The hate you incited was off the scale. Then when machetes had arrived at the school, gangs were roaming the streets looking for bait.
West Yorkshire police told Bailey's mum that terrorism threat had been raised to writ. They had intelligence of people coming from Bradford to get Bailey and his family. Rather than deal with the threat, they moved Bailey and his family to a place of safety. So whilst one child had the support of the whole country, had the support of the prime minister, Sajid Javid, the local football club. Everyone rallying behind this child, £160,000 donated to him.
The other child in this incident, his family were driven from their home. Fret. Groups of men looking for him, ready to commit violence against him. And the police the police stopped their mom. So the police took the family.
The police went and got the family to get them out of their house through imminent danger, and they were taking them to relocate them here. Let's have a look. The night in. This is the accommodation that Bailey's mother with 2 9 year old sisters and children were being relocated to. This one star hotel where rooms are rented by the hour next door to a brothel.
The imam who brought a mob of men up to the school, he has 3 mosques within a stone's throw of where we're standing now. Bailey's mother, through her sense, looked up this hotel, saw it was owned by Muslims, read this read the reviews that it's a prostitute racket drug hole, and got out of the police meat wagon with her children to take them to safety herself. But this is where Kirklees Council were housing those children and that family. This is the most Muslim populated area of Leeds. That family were taken to so called safety, yeah, Surrounded by mosques in what is a Muslim ghetto.
Yeah? Which is why I'm getting bibbed. I'm gonna get some cause a scene now. We went to see from neighbors what it was like at the time of the incident.
Speaker 16: I think it was a a BMW
Speaker 15: the fire down the house.
Speaker 1: God. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 5: So it was
Speaker 16: it was meant to shoot,
Speaker 5: the 7
Speaker 0: To shoot the mum?
Speaker 16: The mum. The 7 2, to the it's
Speaker 0: Well, they come outside and under there. It's shouting and screaming. Shout and screaming.
Speaker 10: Well, I
Speaker 3: saw the video because the neighbor had shared it. And then I saw in the Yorkshire live, them making Bailey out to be really horrible, and that Jamal was a poor little victim, and it it wound me up. So I commented on it. The victim wasn't a victim. He hit me in the back with a hockey stick.
And then within the space of 2 hours, I had about 250 comments saying that I was lying, that I must have been excluded from the school because I'm a liar. Just horrible comments like that. None of them believe in me.
Speaker 0: And did you take this did you take the comment down?
Speaker 3: Yeah. I didn't want to, but my mom was worried for repercussions, so she asked me to take it down so I did.
Speaker 0: This is the area that Kirklees Council thought it was the right place to send a child and his family, who were wanted at the time, the main imam outside their school with mobs of Muslim men looking for them, and this is where they decided to send them. They basically dropped them in their backyard. That's what they were doing. This is the hotel. This is, I believe, a 4 star hotel.
It's totally full of illegal immigrants. This is across the country. So the point to make is that illegal immigrants come here, young fine age men, not families, not children, and this is where council would help them. Let's have a look. Hello, boys.
Hello.
Speaker 5: How are you doing?
Speaker 0: Can I do you mind if I ask, what what country are you from, though?
Speaker 1: I I do not know speak English.
Speaker 0: You do speak English. I do. This is what
Speaker 13: country are you from? Mine
Speaker 0: yeah. Iran? Yeah. Iran. Okay.
Speaker 13: Yeah. Iran.
Speaker 0: Kurdistan. Iran. Okay. Nice call, man. I'm just seeing.
Is the hotel full? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Full.
Enjoying it here? Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 13: Nice hotel. Nice food.
Speaker 0: Nice hotel. Nice food?
Speaker 13: Yeah. Healthy food.
Speaker 0: Healthy food. It looks like a nice hotel. Yeah. How many people are in here?
Speaker 13: I think there's 200.
Speaker 0: 200? Lots of children?
Speaker 13: So my iPhone, I think it has a little children.
Speaker 0: No children?
Speaker 13: Oh, my mom's children. No.
Speaker 0: Not many children. But it's a nice hotel.
Speaker 13: Nice hotel.
Speaker 0: Nice hotel. It is a nice hotel. And if if you look at if you look at where the other family were being housed in Beeston and you compare it to this 4 star 4 star hotel, nice food as our friend says.
Speaker 1: Healthy food.
Speaker 0: Healthy food.
Speaker 11: Yeah. Alright.
Speaker 0: Hello, bro. Hi. How you doing?
Speaker 1: Hey. Do you want to come back in?
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're off now, mate. We're only we're only we're only we're done now.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 11: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Do you know what they have in here? They have a full time doctor and nurses. Full time, stationed in there.
Speaker 13: In, buddy.
Speaker 0: Full time. So you know when you come my dad tried to get a doctor's appointment earlier. Couldn't get one. Full time. Full time.
Full time.
Speaker 1: You're very bad.
Speaker 0: The food's bad? Yeah. The food's bad? Yeah. Is it free?
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's free.
Speaker 5: They called our school. Soon as the media media and all that died, they sent in chief inspectors chief inspectors of fucking off state. We knew they're gonna fail and every fucking thing they can think of.
Speaker 1: I have goofiness, There's a lot more changes. All of that and yesterday. And, you know, they're only in the bank, but it was never picked up.
Speaker 0: Apart from my reporting, there was not a single media statement given the other side of this story. The staff knew. Other pupils knew. They could've exposed the lie. Why didn't they?
Speaker 1: The incident I always quote the incident. Yeah. The incident has reoccurred. It's come to my door. They said you can't talk about it because you've got an undistclosure agreement.
They're not satisfactory. So that was the reason they triggered it.
Speaker 0: They were even not free to tell you the truth or they were terrified of the consequences. And that's for so called journalists. Some can't find the truth, some won't tell the truth, and some they're afraid of the truth. But me, as a journalist, it's my job to present you the truth.
Speaker 1: If you want my honest opinion, they said, get up there. This is I don't know who they is. Get up there and shoot that school. Get up there and get rid of this.
Speaker 0: You see, when the media and politicians decide to kill a story, when they decide to hide the truth from you, they'll do whatever it takes. They shut down the school. It's gone. Everyone lost their jobs. You see, once this Live Our Racist attack had gone global, the truth would never be allowed to come out.
The real truth, that a young Syrian refugee was struggling to fit into his new environment was problematic. His allegedly abusive and violent conduct towards teachers and children was allowed to run unchecked. Why? Did the school authorities turn a blind eye rather than be accused of victimizing the boy, of being racist towards him? They stayed silent.
The truth may have triggered accusations of racism or sparked discussion about immigration policies. The challenges of achieving the successful integration of migrants we welcome into United Kingdom, and the need to take those challenges seriously. You see, Jamal was one of 20,000 Syrian refugees who come to the UK as part of the United Nations resettlement program. The government could not allow their policies to be examined and the consequences and their incompetence to be exposed. And if you don't think the government is incompetent, you ain't been paying attention to anything.
Priti Patel's been talking tough, really tough on controlling our borders for years. And yet we have boatloads of illegal economic migrants being escorted across the English Channel and put into these luxury accommodation at your expense. This ineptitude does nothing for the refugees who come here legally, who we welcome into England, refugees who are trying to integrate and make a new life here. And who was the community's rage directed at? All Syrian refugees.
That's who. When in fact, there are many families of Syrian refugees in the area, we're told, all of them delightful, working hard to settle and integrate into the country they can now call home. I spoke to multiple refugee families. In the school, Gremlin, my children. No.
Any Gremlin. No problems with your children? No. That's it. And you've had a you've had a good experience in the school?
Speaker 10: I used to have 2 friends and they don't Bali and they don't care where from country I can't move anything.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 10: And when I spoke English, like, I was we was about 1 month we've been in here, and I used to not speak English very much. So they used to tell me how to speak all that thing. And now I'm in year 8, and I know how to speak English. And I made more friends, and now I am fine.
Speaker 0: And you're fine? And then no problems?
Speaker 17: I don't feel safe at school. Sometimes I say to my dad, I don't want to go to school anymore. I was just crying and I didn't do nothing because I respect the school rules.
Speaker 0: Who told Jamal to go on camera and say this? Who arranged the media tour? Who encouraged him to take legal action? He was originally going to sue the school for not looking after him and then decided to sue me instead. Who told him to put this in his statement to the High Court?
You see, Jamal doesn't like to break the school rules. Here's the problem. This is his behavior record. Almost a 100 codes for bad behavior. Truancy, verbal abuse to teachers, physical violence towards pupils, and lying.
Yeah, there's plenty for lying. You see, I haven't got all of Jamal's school records. Large sections of documents I was given were blacked out. We tried to get access but we weren't allowed. And the lawyers wrote to the court to explain they had misplaced documentation.
And finally, as you can hear, the lawyers decided what they were gonna allow me to see. Whilst I was preparing my defense, Jamal's lawyers decided what I could see. And this global news story wasn't an accident. It was all carefully planned. You see, the day before the video went viral, a GoFundMe page was set up for Jamal and the video went viral the day after a criminal record check come back on Jamal.
Why would his lawyers do a criminal record check? Well, they had to make sure this was financially beneficial exercise. Wasn't going to be derailed by an unhelpful pass. 15 Rold Jamal, his record was clean by the way. Mohammed Akanji, the jihadist lawyer of choice, was immediately on the global media blitz.
Speaker 19: Listen. I'm very conned to himself. I'm after him for my own reason.
Speaker 8: Right. Okay. Nothing sinister though, is it?
Speaker 19: Oh, fuck. No. No. Journalistic. Oh, journalistic.
Well, that's good.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No.
Speaker 19: No. Fucking totally journalistic. I wanna get all the background on him. You reckon he Yeah. You reckon he was a member of that?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Al and Midrgharun are a prescribed terrorist organization. Almost 60% of terrorists in British prisons are ex members of this organization. They kill. They murder.
They slaughter. That is the organization that Mohammed Khanji and his brother were allegedly, according to this, top mainstream Muslim British journalist who are members of it. How does a Syrian lad find himself working with the jihadist lawyer of choice before this video even went out? Before anyone has seen this viral video. Within 2 weeks, the lawyers have been made the beneficiaries of the GoFundMe page of £160,000.
A plan to sue the school? That's put on hold. And a plan to sue, moi, for libel was launched. What riches had these lawyers promised Jamal and his family? School records were edited.
Migration Yorkshire clamored to make this playground fight about race and hate. They contacted the Home Office as soon as they heard about this playground fight. Yeah. The home office, a playground scuffle. Why are they contacting the home office instantly?
Someone went further. You see, we had this school incident report analyzed by a graphologist. Someone who analyzes handwriting. It appears to show that a second person with very different handwriting doctored the report to allege that Bailey had threatened to stab Jamal. Even though all the witness reports mentioned there was only one teacher there, so only one teacher could have done an instant report.
So, with the careful planning, the jihadist favorite lawyer and the enthusiastic support of some useful idiots, it was possible for the lies to go round the world twice before the truth had had a chance to put his pants on. I now need to mention other repercussions of what happened in Ormondbury. I was being sued for reporting the things that were said to me about Jamau. I had to defend myself. The judges already already ruled that I was not allowed to argue.
It was in the public's interest for people to hear a different perspective of Jamal. I had to prove that the information reported to me was true. That's not the kind of burden placed on Piers Morgan or Jeremy Vine. Piers can describe Bailey as vermin without being held to account. And who is behind propagating this deception and the lawsuit against me?
You see, this is where we get to meet the most sinister part of the unholy alliance. All sorts of people are helping out, but leading the posse from the front is the jihadist lawyer of choice. He represented Shamina Begman, you know the jihadi terrorist that's out in Syria. He represented, I think, Michael Adeballajo, Lee Rigby's killer. I think he's even had to change his name because he's got such a terrible track record.
So this is the lawyer who's suing me and who the media celebrated that he had served me papers even though I wasn't in the country. If you're pillaged, if you've plundered, if you've raped and you're beheaded, and you say you've done it in the name of Islam, well these are the lawyers for you. The lawyers who stepped forward for ISIS by Shmina Begum, who've been fighting to get her back into our country. Who defended Michael Adeballaju who beheaded Lee Rigby. This is Mohammed Akanji and his colleague, Faruk Bajwa, who's been banned from claiming legal aid.
Yeah. Banned from claiming legal aid for putting in fraudulent expense claims. Let me rewind a bit. Let's go back a few weeks. There's an important piece of background information to this.
Speaker 15: Don't know the full ins and outs of it, but, basically, to inform the group call themselves Antifa UK. Yeah. Over there? Yep. To be honest, I kind of haven't, and Antifa Dundee.
The base he says are planning to help possibly kill Tommy Robinson, because they know where he lives and want to silence him. They've got their hands on it says they've got hands hands on to make a 40 sevens, make ketchup bombs and stuff. And allegedly, instead, wherever the foot, these petrol bonds through your door when he sleeps. They say they're also friends with a few MPs.
Speaker 0: Now at the heightened tensions with multiple osmond warnings, they now take back the radar phone, the one option we have to go direct to the police, and they are removing it at this current moment.
Speaker 1: Where are you from? I'm from
Speaker 0: So, look, what did you just say, basically, the the the radar phone or whatever it is? Yes. Yes. The phone, the emergency phone that you Will will be taking that back. You'll be taking that back.
Yeah. But those those phones are They're used for a aren't even for real. Like, so so when there's a heightened threat and people have come to the house and the address has been put out where my kids are, you're then gonna take the panic phone back. It's Christmas 2018. The police come to my family's home to tell me that people in Antifa, file a violent and extremist organisation, are planning to kill me and my family.
See who were the first to comment on this video? Well, Mohammed Akanji of Farooq Bazrunko, of course, the jihadists lawyers of choice, but also Mike Stoodsbury, an independent journalist, an Antifa activist. So the jihadist lawyers knew Antifa were planning to kill me, then actually commented on the video of the Ozmen warning. You see, what happened next is interesting, although not interesting to the solicitors regulation authority or the law society. The people who should be interested in the integrity of our lawyers.
Speaker 16: It will be live streamed. I'm not in charge of the
Speaker 4: filming or anything like that.
Speaker 16: That's, down to the
Speaker 4: the guys over here.
Speaker 16: And you literally know we wanted to do this, so we thought, what mug can we probably do with a creep for this?
Speaker 0: So 2 lawyers who know Antifa are planning to kill me seek out an Antifa extremist, hire him for one day, just one day, and send him to live stream the servant of papers to my home, my family's home. Papers which had already been served by the way, with a gang. When my wife and children were there, when they knew I was abroad, lawyers commissioned the Antifa Extremist to broadcast my home address in order, as they put it, to cause a spectacle.
Speaker 18: The law firm or the lawyer who has been, you know, sort of taking the lead on the Tommy case wanted to make sure, doubly sure that that, a, Tommy got the, the the letter. It actually went out 2 2 two different ways, and he wanted to make a bit of a spectacle out of it. This this is all very they're very amusing.
Speaker 0: A group supported by Mike Stitchbury came to the home that my wife and children were in on a Sunday afternoon when I wasn't even in the country. So let's have a look at Mike Stitchbury, who calls himself a journalist, who promoted this event, who shared it and encouraged it, who found it amusing that my wife was so scared she had to ring the police. My wife has been sat down and told in her home that Antifa are planning to kill her. They're planning to kill our family and harm our family. She's been told that she may get acid in her face.
Well, how do you think she felt on a Sunday afternoon whilst my children are playing outside on their bikes? To be told that Antifa were on their way to our home. Let's have a look at Mike Stuxbury, the man that sent them. Here he is self admitting that he is part of Antifa. Here he is promoting violence against his opposition.
Punch them, punch them, punch them. Here he is hoping that buses full of Antifa get shipped in to smash people's skulls in. Here he is calling for white genocide. Mike Stitchby is an extremist. He's a far left extremist who currently is playing a victim.
He encouraged people to come and he sent people and was part of an organization that communicated together, to send people to the home where my wife and children were when I wasn't there. He even crowdfunded to support them in their action.
Speaker 18: He, you know, he was looking at various people and eventually he sort of came on to Dick Coughlin. Dick Coughlin? I can't say it properly. Who is a a a YouTuber who has made videos about Tommy for, god, almost 10 years, I think, who's a who's a real critic. He's a I don't know if you've checked him out, but he's a he's a funny guy.
Speaker 5: Check out. Yeah.
Speaker 18: He's, sort of, you know, got red hair, x he calls you know, he's he's an ex crackhead, basically.
Speaker 0: And who is this antique extremist hired to come to my kids' home? Keep watching. I went up to where and they said, right. We'll take that from him. We'll make sure he gets it.
And later that night, the Antifa Extremists hired by their lawyers had a message for me and my children.
Speaker 16: And on that note, see,
Speaker 0: on that on the happy note.
Speaker 6: Oh, by the way, Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate.
Speaker 0: So look at the man that they sent. The man that you can see, the Muslim lawyer, handed privileged documentation giving this man my children's home address. That's what he's done. Fully aware of the serious danger my family are in, and he hands them my children's address. They then come to my children's home, my wife gets a phone call, my children run off the drive, they lock themselves in the house, they ring emergency, the emergency 999 call for the police to come, they press panic buttons, they need support because Antifa are coming.
They came, they told the Muslim lawyer, he's fully aware they're coming to live stream where my family are. They live stream and dox the name of the road. They dox the door number. I went up to where and I'm and I said, right. We'll take that from him.
We'll make sure he gets it. The man's specifically chosen. He was chosen. He says in his own video.
Speaker 16: The lawyer in this case was a guy called Mohammed Sunimi Akundra who works for a solicitors in London called, I shit you not, Farooq Bajwa and Co, solicitors of London. I get asked by this guy that, they've decided that they're going to Tommy Robinson is going to be served legal papers, so he can be sued by this family. And they asked, me, do I want to be the one to go along to serve legal documents?
Speaker 0: Let's have a look at who Dick Coughlin is. Let's have a look at some of the things he said. Here he is promoting hatred against black people. Serious, this is a crime. The comments he makes are a crime.
Here he is promoting hatred against Pakistanis. Here he is singing a song promoting anti semitism, singing a song about lampshades being made out of Jewish people's skin from the hollow. Yeah. 3rd black, 3rd black, you're a good killer kite. We're white, far right, and we're gonna have a fight.
We're in the A self confessed racist anti semitic crackhead was sent to my children's property. He talked about raping my wife in her skull socket. He talked about my children being fed for a meat winder. He talked about burning my house down and whilst masturbating with my family in it. Now other than to terrorize my wife and children, why would any sane person do this?
It worked, okay. Tipped off by a friend who saw the gang on livestream approaching, my ex wife hit the panic button and barricaded herself and our children in a bedroom. The police thankfully responded in time. And these are exactly the same tactics being used against the unbelievably courageous children in Ombre. Threats of violence and rape against children who are willing to stand with me in defence of the truth at the High Court of London.
The video release, media, GoFundMe, Antifa, it all happened at the same time. It was coordinated, and it was about hate and making money. And how that far left activist, who appears to be an antisemitic, Jew hating, black hating racist, came to my home with his gang and threatened to kill my children. These lawyers, the mainstream media, they don't care about refugees. They don't care about Jamelle.
They don't care about the truth. Say that bloke who made the video saying
Speaker 1: he's gonna kill the kids. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Can you if you didn't do it, I know 100% give a statement. I know. I was there.
Speaker 5: Okay. Give a
Speaker 0: statement about that. She complained about it. She contacted Paul, remember, it would have been the liaison officer at the time, to Okay. Ask if he was arrested. I found out his address, and I gave you all the information for him.
So even now Right. Say now, looking at that, can he be arrested now then?
Speaker 15: I don't know what happened with
Speaker 20: the previous report because when we search on our system that we currently use
Speaker 0: You probably got very good.
Speaker 20: See any crime report that was linked to it.
Speaker 0: You see, the next day, knowing I've been provoked with threats against my ex wife and my children, no doubt thinking they would catch me conspiring to commit violence and lock me up on a conspiracy charge. Here, outside my ex wife's house, men in a car that has never been registered, check the registration plate. So presumably from the security services, we've listing devices recording what's being said in my home. The involvement of the security services may explain why Dick Coughlin, the man who publicly threatened to murder my children, has never even been spoken to or arrested despite my wife's complaints. What are you doing?
Is there any reason the back of your glove? There's no
Speaker 5: one in the back of your glove.
Speaker 0: So what are you doing? We're not here. Anything to do with you. What are you doing now? Well, who what do you think we're doing?
I think you're starting to do me.
Speaker 15: No. No. It's a pissy.
Speaker 0: Who's this with? What are you doing? And there is someone in the back. I'm at
Speaker 11: Can you
Speaker 1: tell me what you're doing now?
Speaker 0: Because essentially, I've got threats against me. I'm not. Yeah? So what are you doing? I don't know what you're doing, bro.
That's all everyone knows what you're doing. I've got police officers sat with a recording in a recording van. In the back of this van is a recording station. I'm not standing. You're not going.
No. Because I no. Because what yous are doing I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing. I know what yous are doing.
They're sat in the back of their van. This is recording devices. The whole of this back thing because he just opened up when I got him out. The whole of this back thing is recording where they're pointing it because they what this is has been a setup. These people are set these police officers are setting me
Speaker 1: up.
Speaker 0: They're setting me up. It's a setup. They're setting me up by sending people to my house because they think I'm gonna react and do something, and they're recording it with listening devices. We checked the vehicle registration plate outside the house on the government website and there's no such vehicle. Let's not forget the politicians are fearless leaders.
It was only when I went alone to the home of self declared journalist, Mike Stuchby, to ask him why he had done what he had and why he thought it was funny to intimidate my children. Some of you may some of you may have seen that people have been outside my home. Timberland, my family. The difference is when they come to my home, 5 men come to my home. I'm on my own.
I've had to move my children who are scared and upset. And people encouraged people to participate in coming to my address. One of those such people
Speaker 13: who
Speaker 0: It was only then that the fearless then deputy leader of the Labour Party, Tom Watson, steps forwards. Ignoring reality completely.
Speaker 21: Every major social media platform other than YouTube has taken down Steven Yaxley Lennon's profile because of his hateful conduct. Late on Monday night, Yaxley Lennon turned up at a journalist home banging on the doors and windows demanding to be let in. And after being escorted away by the police, he returned at 5 AM and continued his intimidation. The incident was live streamed. He later warned journalists in a YouTube video to expect a knock at the door.
Does the secretary of state think that is right that YouTube and the parent company Alphabet continues to give this man a platform, sir?
Speaker 0: It'd be funny, you know, if it wasn't so insidious. The hardly honorable mister Watson totally misrepresented what happened, and from behind his shield of parliamentary privilege, bravely declared but I've been terrorizing a journalist. Journalist. Stokesbury's an antifa activist who incites violence and wants to kill white people. Terrorizing.
Was I terrorizing? Mister Watson bravely demanded that I'd be removed from YouTube. YouTube had now had only recently confirmed that none, not one of my videos had broken any of their stringent guidelines. And my videos hadn't broken any laws. It was clear I hadn't harassed anyone, certainly not Mike Stutchbury, if indeed he is a journalist.
But none of that mattered. My wife and children left their family home that night. They never went back. Perhaps having their lives endangered by their jihadist lawyers. See my wife started legal action against Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra's firm.
But Mo and Co, Mohammed Akanji and Farooq Basra, see they weren't so keen on facing the law as they were on abusing the law to persecute others for financial and ideological reasons. On the 31st March 2019, they promptly collapsed their law firm. They'd never be involved in the case. That's what they said. And doctor Farooq Basra, well he's no longer gonna be a lawyer.
He'd been living in Pakistan. That's it. That's what they said. That's how easy it was for Mo and Co to escape justice. Interestingly, they're still signing documents on the case on the 6th June, months after saying they're not involved.
Several other law firms have reported them to the Law Society, the body that is supposed to make sure lawyers behave ethically. Nothing's been done. I wonder why. In fact, all the lawyers working at Fruit Basement and Co just moved across to a new law firm called Burlington's. And guess what?
Yeah. Burlington's took on Jamelle's case against me. FruitBazwa now works for Burlington's. FruitBazwa's son now works for Burlington's. Fruit Basra is Burlington's GDPR expert.
Pretty ironic, no? Fruit Basra and Co leaked my children's address to an antifa activist to put it online for everyone. And if we've been stupid enough to expect more ethical behaviour from Birlingtons than from Faruk Bajwa and Mohammed Akanji, well, we'd have been disappointed. I just really, which I've been trying to do, I need all of the disclosure, which I haven't had. I haven't had a full disclosure of his school records.
Speaker 12: Therefore, to make sure, that we have it, that that some documents haven't been lost in the transfer of the bathroom through Bourgeois to to Burlington's, we have done another subject access request to the council for
Speaker 0: July. And how long would that and how long would the council take for that?
Speaker 12: I I don't know. I I don't think they gave us time frame, did they,
Speaker 11: Luke? No. No.
Speaker 15: They didn't, unfortunately. So you're asking
Speaker 0: so what what you're saying is you believe there may be things that I that I haven't been disclosed. You don't know how long they're gonna take, but you won't agree to an adjournment?
Speaker 12: No. No. Our position is that we're not agreeing to an adjournment. Those are my instructions.
Speaker 0: Because my my my concern and serious concern is the safety of the witnesses. And and it's a genuine and and if you I don't believe for 1 minute that Mohammed al Khemji or Farooq Basra give a shit about any of this or Jamelle. Yeah. I I generally don't think they do. And this is I'm
Speaker 12: just gonna say Farooq Bajwa and Mohammed Dukunji have nothing to do with this case. This is my case.
Speaker 0: How how how come how come how come then
Speaker 12: to anybody from Fruit Bajwa
Speaker 0: How come then Fruit Bajwa
Speaker 12: have Burlington started with me.
Speaker 0: How come Fritbajwa signed a form 3 months after he left then to do this case?
Speaker 12: It's absolute it was, if if that was the case, it was before I gave the undertaking, and he wasn't involved in this case before.
Speaker 0: He signed a he signed a form dated June in June. He signed a form, and the date on that form that he signed is June. He left this case in March, apparently. How come?
Speaker 12: Well, I I I if you explanation as to why. I'm not quite sure what the formula is about.
Speaker 0: No. You'll see it you'll see it you'll see it on my documentary. Okay so when you when you send me what you decide is relevant yeah, how am I going to know what you've cut out?
Speaker 15: Well I suppose you wouldn't.
Speaker 0: I wouldn't. Does that seem fair? If the info if the if the information is not relevant, then what harm could it do in me hacking it?
Speaker 15: But it's not about harm Stephen, it's about privacy.
Speaker 0: For the last for the last 3 days, since I gave you, since you received videos so that you become aware that I have video evidence that's going to prove my case, since that point my ex wife and my children for the last 2 days have had police at their house because they've been receiving threats. On top of that pictures of my ex wife have been put online by the same people who were in bed with Mohammed Okanji. Then 2 days ago Mohammed Okanji doxxed my mother and father's house. Last night, that house at 1 o'clock in the morning was smashed to pieces with bricks through the windows, yeah? This is all going on in the background of it.
I've been trying to get my stuff ready, but just so you're aware of what's going on as to why I don't trust the words you say. When you have Farouk Basra's son working for your, working for your company and Farooq Basra is the man that sent people to threaten to kill my children, I'm wondering why in the last 48 hours or last 72 hours, since I disclosed information to you, Why why my family and loved ones have come under persecuted harm? Of which is all detailed with police records and video footage of everything that's been going on. So I'm super concerned and don't trust you or your party to decide what's relevant in this case. I don't trust you.
So where, how, if this should be fair trial about getting out the truth, if that's what you're working for, you need to give me your disclosure. Instead of reviewing it and taking bits out, which is what you've already done with the school records. You'll say, because I know that's not the full school records, so and you've covered up things which, and Luke, Francesca told me, I have a recording of her telling me, that your, that Burlington's did not retract anything, redact anything, yet in court you had to admit you did. I've got the recording of that telling you. Everything was redacted prior to coming to you.
Everything was redacted prior to coming to you. And then in court you sit and admit that you have been redacting things. So, forgive me. It's just lie after lie. This is Burlington's lawyers losing documents that they're supposed to send to me and deleting things that they don't want me to see?
Misplaced. How do you misplace documents that were electronically filed on their case management system through Basra and Co, then passed over to Berlin's? All of this is because they're sharing it. And all of this is to put pressure on me in the weeks before it. And all this, and this is a kanji, I guarantee you this is a kanji, a kanji working with resistant hay.
The the account that's put put it on is is resisting hate, yeah? Resistant hate who a country hires with Dick Coughlin to send to the house before. They're like his little minis. So now he knows that it's coming, it's going to land on his lap. The whole lie that they've told, and this is the actions they use.
They can't play the man so they play the kids and the family. You don't need to be scared, Sanya, because, they're doing this
Speaker 10: you guys just told me he's a good boy.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I know, babe. But they're purposely just doing that. But when they're doing this, they're just doing this to try and get cause me shit and make you worry. So I know it's easier said, but you don't need to worry.
Yeah? They're doing this so they're doing this so that I don't beat them in court. That's why they're doing this. Yeah? The mad thing is the whole time this goes on, the media and all of the, we're the bad guys.
That we've been on. But like I'm the one persecuting people or targeting them. And they're such cowards. They're such cowards, man. I just got a phone call, and they said goodbye.
I'm so scared. I've told the police, but I'm so scared.
Speaker 10: Yeah. Hello?
Speaker 0: Jenna, who's just wrong with Spencer?
Speaker 10: We don't know at the minute.
Speaker 11: What are
Speaker 0: the police then?
Speaker 10: I'm just making a statement.
Speaker 0: Okay. But just quickly, what are they what are they are they getting that account? Let's put a picture of you online. How who's who showed you that picture, Jenna?
Speaker 10: It's on Twitter. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Who saw it?
Speaker 10: I saw it myself.
Speaker 0: You saw it yourself. Okay. Yeah. Are they gonna are the police sorting out to get rid of it?
Speaker 10: Yeah, they've taken the address of the Twitter person to put it out.
Speaker 0: If you can say I give them 50 addresses of people who have done exactly this over the years, including the redhead man who what about the redhead bloke who friends come to kids? What do they say about that?
Speaker 10: Well nothing really.
Speaker 0: No? It's a crime. Do you know what I mean? If I make if I make a video threatening to kill some kids, I'll be arrested. So that the point where you need to ask them specifically and say to them you made a complaint, someone threatened to murder your children, you had to leave your home yeah, Those threats have now followed you to where you're now living.
Yeah. And they're coming from the same people, the same organizations, the same people they done fuck all about last time. They didn't lick them. They didn't speak to them. They didn't.
The solicitor is still acting with impunity, doing it to my mom and dad yesterday. See, you need to specifically ask them, then I want our answer, Adam. When you made a complaint against Richard Coughlin, Dick Coughlin last year, why have they not done anything? And give us and get you a follow-up and an answer as to why they haven't
Speaker 15: done anything, if you can.
Speaker 11: Just get
Speaker 12: it up. You've got time?
Speaker 0: I mean, the kids are right. Am I right that you managed to track the number? Yes. So you know who made those phone calls to her and the
Speaker 14: We know where the number it came from
Speaker 5: Yep.
Speaker 14: And who who that phone was registered to. So that's all obviously, we cannot prove well, I I at that time, I wasn't able to prove who. I only could say where the number came from.
Speaker 0: As in as in as in whose phone is?
Speaker 14: Who the phone is registered to.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Because because, obviously, for me, this was this was threatening phone calls a week before a high court trial trying to prevent the court trying to prevent the court to justice. How come no one's been arrested?
Speaker 14: I can't see any again on the crime report.
Speaker 0: If I send you evidence, which I'm going to anyway because it's all going to the judge, if I send you evidence of Mohammed Akanji doxing my mum and dad's address, if I send you evidence of criminal damage and attacks in the middle of the night at an old pensioner's old pensioner's home, and I show you evidence of pictures of my wife being put on, ex wife being put online, and my son. They've hung my 11 year old son's phone. The police were all involved. They've been threatening my 11 year old son. Yeah?
This is what's going on. If I send you evidence of that, do you think you'll support an anonymity order to protect the children in this case?
Speaker 15: Steven, I I I can't answer that because I don't have instructions to answer that. I don't have conduct of the matter. But what I can clarify for you is some of the issues that I can give answers on. One of those of which I heard you made reference to, Farooq's son working. He is not involved in the case in any way at all, has no access to any files whatsoever.
Speaker 0: You've heard how Luke hack here. He couldn't explain why they were adapting and deleting information from documents before handing them over to me. Information I should have been given. He couldn't answer the simple question, who decides what's relevant? Unfortunately, in terms of integrity, bowlands don't appear to be any better than Fruit Bajwa and Mohammed al Kanchi.
You see, I was told he'd violently attacked a girl. I was told he'd attack someone as part of a gang. And I was told he'd threaten to stab someone. In fact, Jamal would violently attack more than 1 girl and we presented the evidence to the court, including the testimony of courageous children who came to court. These children weren't Tommy Robinson fans, but they came to the high court to speak the truth.
So let me just look at one of the pupils that come to court and testified. This young girl wasn't a supporter of mine, didn't support my politics, but she still came to court and testified. Let me have a look at her school record and read what her teacher says about her. Charlie is a very mature and hardworking member of the form. She has been an absolute pleasure to have in the form.
She has represented the form in the school council and in various events across the school throughout the school year. She represents all that is positive and exciting about studying studying at Almunbury. Charlie is now currently studying law at university. Why would this girl lie, randomly lie, before I was involved? Why would she then travel to the high court of London and commit perjury?
Speaker 11: Because
Speaker 0: that is what the judge has found, that she's made it all up. And Jamal, the Syrian refugee, the one with multiple lies in his school records and behavioral discipline reads everywhere, well, he was telling the truth. That is what he found in this case. Why would a mother post images and send me those images of her daughter being black and blue? Why?
For what reason? Why would the staff lie? Why would the head teacher lie? Why would every single person who was recorded covertly lie about what Jamal was like. 12 different people lying about what Jamal was like.
Why? See, the judge has really helped us out here. The judge says people can lie for reasons that make no sense. Sometimes for no reason at all. He could not readily identify any explanation for why some of these people were prepared to do so and lie.
He concludes the alleged assaults, they never happened at all. Despite Jamal's school record, which you've seen, the judge states the Cayman's record is overwhelmingly positive. He acknowledged Jamal has a record of lying, but decides on this occasion, it is Jamal who's telling the truth and everyone else, everyone else is lying. Really? We waited 10 weeks for this?
That's your conclusion? That's the logic from the highest liable judge in our land? There was no jury. That's right. There's no jury.
All of these people were lying, But Jamal, he was telling the truth. Jamal, who could only find his dad Jihad to speak for him. Not a single teacher. Not a classmate, not a friend, not a neighbor, or a support worker came to court to support Jamal's version of defense. Jamal, who said he only broke the rules a few times at school and even then it weren't his fault.
His school records suggest something very different. I wanna be clear and fair to Jamal. He denies every accusation against him, completely and utterly. On the day the 5 courageous children appeared in the dock, giving testimony against Jamal. Jamal didn't even show up in court that day to face his accusers.
Neither did the press. The press actually left court when the witnesses stood up to give their evidence in my defense. It's alarming to think we have this kind of intellect at the top of our judiciary. The story of these 2 children is actually a story about free speech or the death of it. It's a story about how the mainstream media is more interested in pushing an agenda than giving you balance and truth.
How it continues despite Levenson to act with impunity. Is the media held to account for what they report? Have Pierce Morgan or Jeremy Vine been held to account? No. It's a story about how the the law is being manipulated and exploited by the far left and Islamists to destroy the lives of anyone who speaks out against the accepted so called progressive, so called liberal narrative.
Or about the poisonous influence of Islam's Sharia law in our society. Is the law fit for purpose? No. And it's a story about our government and judiciary's disdain for free speech and the truth, and the lengths that they will go to in order to silence dissent, especially with its new and increasing powers. Is our government being held accountable for its actions?
No. Is the judiciary independent of political influence? You've seen all the evidence. You decide. Whether you agree in my politics is irrelevant.
When dissent is crushed, free speech dies and governments move one step closer to tyranny. The lawyers know the truth. Even Jamal's father Jihad, he knows the truth about his son. They all knew the truth and were using Jamal to further their agenda, regardless of the consequences for Jamal. They continued to pursue the case, which incidentally, has caused my divorce and bankruptcy.
My ex wife had to choose between her marriage to me, and the safety of our children. I'm glad she chose our children. We're still best mates. You see, Jamal's lawyers told me very early on, if I apologized and paid them 50 grand, they'd drop their case. If you're watching this, you know the decision I made.
I might apologize for reporting what I was told, for what I believed to be true, for standing up for Bailey, a young lad unjustly vilified by pretty much everyone. But in silence and dissent, are the media and our government any different to the governments they criticize so much? China, Russia, Iran. Immigration, COVID, Brexit, if it doesn't fit the narrative, you will not hear the alternative view. And where else have we seen this?
Where else has the media, politicians, police, and social services hidden for truth for decades, fearful of being called racist, grooming gangs. That's where a cover up of such horrific cost to 1,000 of young girls in towns and cities across our country. And nowhere worse than under the stewardship of counselor Shabir Pandor's Kirklees Council. You see, hiding the truth doesn't protect communication. It does the total opposite.
It undermines trust in public institutions. It stokes resentment and conflict in our communities. Tragically, those who lead us don't seem to have the moral clarity or courage to speak the truth. They cause the division that they're trying to prevent. People ask me, was it worth it?
Yeah. It was worth it. The truth is always worth defending. I'm still here. If you were born in the United Kingdom, you've already won the lottery your life.
An inheritance from our parents and grandparents of freedom, equality under English law, and democracy. If we allow ourselves to be silenced, that inheritance is rendered worthless. What legacy will we leave for the children and grandchildren who come after us? None of us can afford to let free speech die. We cannot and we will not be silenced.
So you've seen. I'm being sent to jail. I'm being prosecuted for showing you the truth. Nothing else. I didn't lie.
Okay? They've lied, continually lied. Now for the attorney general to bring a charge against a member of the public for contempt to court, it has to be in the public interest. I say to the attorney general, this is not the police prosecuting. In fact, the claimant in this case is not asking me to to be prosecuted.
His lawyers are not asking me to be prosecuted. The Labour government's attorney general is the one attempting to send me to jail. Now for it to be in the public's interest you remember the public. You've just watched this expose. Is it in your interest to lock me up for 2 years?
How can it be? Let the government know. Let the attorney general know by signing the petition at www.truthontrial.co.uk to let them know you don't support the imprisonment of journalists for reporting facts to you, the British public. Who knows what the future now holds for me? The one thing that gives me a peace of mind if I'm in prison or if even if the worst happens is knowing that my family have stability and have security.
If you can support them during these times, the link is at www.helptommy.com. I really appreciate your support.