reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 1:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UK's official prescriber database reveals shocking data on midazolam prescribing. An audit is needed for deaths in care homes with high midazolam usage. Criminal charges should be laid if patients were given midazolam instead of antibiotics. The spike in midazolam prescription was driven by euthanasia injections, not the oral form. This database is not impacted by ICU admissions or ventilation use. The deliberate neglect and killing of geriatric residents is a grave concern. The unnecessary protocols implemented for COVID led to a significant drop in care home occupancy and numerous deaths. Harold Shipman's actions pale in comparison.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

HOLY CRAP This is the data for midazolam prescribing from the UKs official prescriber database I have no words. #3tablets #democide @chrismartenson @Fynnderella1 @EWoodhouse7 @jjcouey https://openprescribing.net/analyse/#org=regional_team&numIds=0408020W0,1501041T0,0408020V0,0401010Q0&denom=nothing&selectedTab=chart…

Analyse | OpenPrescribing openprescribing.net

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

@chrismartenson @Fynnderella1 @EWoodhouse7 @jjcouey What needs to happen now is an audit needs to be undertaken of deaths in care homes where midazolam usage was high. If the patients that died were given midazolam instead of antibiotics in March - May 2022, criminal charges must be laid. But who created the policy?

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

@chrismartenson @Fynnderella1 @EWoodhouse7 @jjcouey Just a note that the chart above is created from the GP prescriber database. Therefore it should not be impacted by any increase in ICU admission or specific use for ventilation. This looks to be solely for use in nursing homes and at home. Harold Shipman style.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Bad Cheese 🧀🧀🧀 A point of note - the spike in midazolam prescription (on this *GP* database) was driven almost entirely by injectable 10mg/2ml doses (1501041T0). This was not the anxiolytic oral form. It's a euthanasia injection. https://openprescribing.net/analyse/#org=regional_team&numIds=1501041T0AAAAAA&denom=nothing&selectedTab=chart

Analyse | OpenPrescribing openprescribing.net

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

For those claiming that these drugs were being used for ventilating people in hospital, a reminder that this is the GP prescribing database. An example - prescriptions for propofol (only used in hospital) - zero

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This is damning - NSW health. How the hell can you justify an "anticipated end of life care" for a pneumonia? Seriously - what is wrong with you people? (archived) https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/communities-of-practice/Pages/guide-medication-prescribing.aspx

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Archive https://archive.is/L6fQ3

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

#gerigate

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This thread deserves its own hashtag. The deliberate neglect and killing of geriatric residents of nursing homes, home care and hospitals due to protocols implemented for "COVID". None of which was necessary. #gerigate 👇👇👇👇👇

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Update

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Harold Shipman is dancing on Alexander Fleming's grave. All they needed was #3tablets antibiotics and standard post-viral pneumonia care. Instead, UK GPs were told to euthanise them - care of @NICEComms death protocol Why did you delete this document?

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

BOMBSHELL: For those doubting Matt Hancock and @drlukeevans desperation to euthanise elderly in care homes in April 2020. ▶️10% immediate drop in care home occupancy. ▶️55,000 deaths. ▶️11-sigma Harold Shipman was a warm up. #Gerigate @MaajidNawaz https://www.statista.com/statistics/1231777/care-home-occupancy-in-the-uk/

UK: occupancy of care homes | Statista In the second quarter of 2021, the occupancy rate of care homes in the United Kingdom (UK) stood at 79.5 percent. statista.com
Saved - April 11, 2023 at 2:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The American medical establishment's use of protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic has drawn comparisons to the National Socialists' Aktion T4 program, which killed 300,000 disabled people. The protocols incentivize doctors to follow a one-size-fits-all approach, with legal immunity from liability. Patients are often restrained, given lethal drug combinations, and denied life-saving treatments. Families have filed complaints, but hospitals fight to deny them the right to try alternative medicines. The isolation, dangerous treatments, and legal immunity add up to a design to harm and profit.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Mega Thread: American T4 - Protocols That Kill

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“We were just following protocols” That is the phrase that we are going to be hearing a lot of in the future. It’s reminiscent of what the German doctors said during the Nuremberg trials. This phrase will be used un-ironically by the majority of our medical establishment when…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is an inevitability, a crime of this scale cannot be swept under the rug, especially in that age of instant communication. Much like the National Socialists, there will be attempts at denials, gaslighting and accusations but they will be to no avail. Too many families exist…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The National Socialists had euthanasia initiative called the Aktion T4 Program. It was a precursor to their final solution that sought the extermination of the Jewish people. This little known program was responsible for the deaths of 300,000 disabled people. The first victims…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

From the Documentary “Caring Corrupted - The Killing Nurses of The Third Reich”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In post-World War 1 Germany, Hitler's policies were implemented due to the economic situation and the Versailles Treaty. The nurses in the Nazi era became involved in the killing of children and later adults. Propaganda promoted the idea of eliminating those deemed "life unworthy of life." The nurses played a role in administering lethal drug overdoses, exposing children to hypothermia, and withholding food to cause starvation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The economic situation in Germany following World War 1 and the Versailles Treaty led to the wholesale implementation of Hitler's policies. They started killing children first and then a bit later on started killing adults. It's not prizing that the nurses in the in the Nazi era got caught up in all this. The propaganda was everywhere about killing people who were considered life unworthy of life, useless feeders was the term they used. The nurses were the ones who, held the children while they were being killed. They gave them the overdoses of drugs. They were the ones who put them out on the verandas to die of hypothermia. The nurses were the ones who helped withheld the feeding so the children would die of starvation.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This program was started with a letter sent to Hitler in 1939. A loyalist had inquired directly to Hitler to ask if he could euthanize his own son who was born with blind, subject to convulsion and exhibited mental disabilities. The letter intrigued Hitler and he sent his own…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A photograph of Hitler’s physician Karl Brandt. Brandt confirmed the situation to Hitler and the order was given to kill the boy with a lethal injection. The cause of death on his birth certificate read, “heart weakness”.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This death was the basis for Aktion T4 and it was set in motion September 1st, 1939. This is the authorization letter.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The program established the creation of the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registering of Hereditary and Congenital Illnesses. Bureaucratic-speak for a death panel. Every baby born was to be inspected by an official with a report issued that stated the physical condition. If…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is a photo of Richard Jenne, an unfortunate victim of the sadistic program.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The book Death and Deliverance: 'Euthanasia' in Germany, C.1900 to 1945, detailed an account of the abject horrors inflicted on innocent children.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is one of the most chilling quotes I’ve read in a long time. “As he displayed the child around like a dead hare, he pointed out, with a knowing look and a cynical grin, “This one will last another two or three day.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I write this brief background so you, the reader can really get a sense of the evil. These are horrors that if told to us without documentary proof, most of us would never accept as true and yet they are true. So if doctors and nurses could be so cruel and inhumane once in…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Amazing Grace This is Grace Schara, a 19 year young woman who many believe was killed due to misconduct of the medical staff at the hospital she was admitted to after a positive COVID diagnosis.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Grace, who had Down syndrome was a high functioning, rambunctious young lady, loved by everyone she encountered for her big smile and even bigger heart. Sadly, Grace is one of many lives ended due to a set of guidelines put in place by the CDC that incentivize protocols via…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Not only that, if Doctors follow the recommendations, the are immune from liability. The following is an excerpt provided by the Congressional Research Service that explain how it works.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“To encourage the expeditious development and deployment of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) to limit legal liability for losses…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Key word there: Willful This one word affords Doctors who follow protocols the plausible deniability they need to be exonerated of wrong doing. Why would a doctor need any kind of immunity from liability if their first priority was truly caring for the patient and to do no harm?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Let’s read part of the Hippocratic Oath all of these doctors swore upon when receiving their medical license. “I swear that, according to my ability and judgement, I will keep this Oath and this contract: “To hold him who taught me this art equally dear to me as my parents, to…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The oath continues further but you get the idea. DO NO HARM or INJUSTICE. After Grace’s death, her family filed a complaint to the hospital administrators. The key points are provided below you can understand the treatment she was subjected to.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The Complaint Reads: 1.The hospital staff put Grace in restraints, without permission and without attempting alternatives, when she wanted to get out of bed to use the bathroom her last morning. Jessica (Grace’s Sister) overheard them say, "the family isn’t going to like this."…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

A timeline of Grace’s Last Day. Look at the amount of drugs they gave her. These drugs in combination are lethal, especially if the way they are administered and the protocols related to care are ignored.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

To really understand what occurred listen to this Nurse Practitioner who breaks it all down.

Video Transcript AI Summary
After Grace's father left the hospital, doctors increased the drugs given to Grace without anyone advocating for her. Nurse practitioner Sue reviewed Grace's medical records and explained the drugs used. Cresodex, an anesthesia medication, should only be used for sedation or anesthesia for up to 24 hours, but it was used for much longer. Lorazepam, used for anxiety or seizures, was also given. The combination of these drugs, along with morphine, suppressed Grace's breathing and heart function. It is clear that the prolonged and cumulative use of these drugs put Grace at high risk for respiratory depression and cardiac arrest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After Grace's father was removed from the hospital, doctors began increasing the amount of drugs they were giving to Grace while no one was there to advocate for her. 44 hours passed as the family worked with their attorneys to have Grace's sister, Jess, be her new advocate while in the hospital. We spoke with a nurse practitioner named Sue, who wishes to remain anonymous. She reviewed Grace's medical records, and here, she breaks down the drug stack that was given to Grace leading up to her death. Speaker 1: So the first one that they were giving is the one called Cresodex, and that's the one that they use for anesthesia. The indications Speaker 0: to use that medication is either Speaker 1: if they're trying to sedate somebody, patient is either if they're trying to sedate somebody for in an intensive care setting, like I mentioned, somebody that would be on a ventilator, for example, or if they're trying to put them under anesthesia for a procedure or a surgery. And so, you know, that's Appropriate use. If somebody's being sedated just because they're in a bed and they're using it as a chemical restraint, You know, ethically, that's already questionable. However, if they chose to use it and they did, it's Very clear on the package insert, which is how, you know, the the directions we are to follow as health Care providers as to how to administer medication, it's very clear that that medication is not to be used for more than 24 hours continuously. And as you see with Prasodex, they were using it for much longer than 24 hours. On 13th, which was Grace's last day, They started at that 0.7 and then started edging it up and went to 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, and that's where it ended. So they really did bump up that dose and that's anesthetic. So then when we look at that last day, They also added lorazepam, which is the Ativan, which is typically used for anxiety, but can be used For prolonged seizures, for example, it can be a pre anesthetic, so you don't remember what was during a procedure. They gave a dose of that at 11:25 in the morning, And they gave it IV 0.5, IV push. Then they gave a dose at 546 in the evening, And then that was 0.5, and then they gave another dose of 0.5 at five 49, 3 minutes later. That was ordered to be given at 0.5 milligrams as needed every 6 hours. So that 2nd dose 3 minutes later was not even following orders, and they wrote a note in there that They overrode that order because her respiratory rate was 55, and they They overrode that order because of the work of breathing that she was having. But if we go back to the looking at the Presidex, Precovax is an anesthetic. It decreases your ability to breathe. It decreases the ability to get Oxygen into the lungs, so the natural outcome of being on a sedative is you're going to breathe faster and work harder to breathe. So now they're giving Lorazepam to overcome what's being done by the president. And then, You know, the kind of the final push there was they gave the 2 milligrams of morphine IV push at 6 15 PM. So that was less than a half an hour after the second dose of Pam, all of those work in combination with each other to suppress your ability to breathe In a person that was in there for acute respiratory illness, and they work to Suppress the ability of the heart to pump. So when these are used in combination like that, they have a cumulative effect, and you're supposed To have something by the bedside to reverse that action if someone would have their heart start to stop or their respirations There are 2 c's. In my professional opinion, nobody could look at that chart and see something different. We all understand that these things are cumulative. We all stand that these things are cumulative. We all understand that you're supposed to lower doses. We all understand that prolonged use of this In short, you know, periods of time of use of this would be cumulative, would be at High risk for respiratory depression and cardiac arrest.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Grace was issued a Do Not Resuscitate order without the consent of her parents and as you read, she was restrained against her will for wanting to use the restroom. The nurses and doctors had made a decision, a decision that is not theirs to make. That Grace was not going to…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

To add insult to injury the state of Wisconsin sent a letter to the family letting them know how sorry they were for their loss and that they were eligible for a $9000 funeral expense reimbursement through FEMA since Grace was considered a COVID death. Her mother was quoted as…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

How many families were essentially paid off with this FEMA Funeral Fund? I confirmed the FEMA funeral expense amount here, there is up to $35K available to families.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a flyer explaining the program. https://www.fema.gov/disaster/coronavirus/economic/funeral-assistance/faq

Funeral Assistance FAQ Frequently asked questions for Coronavirus 19 or COVID funeral assistance through FEMA. fema.gov

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This document is a breakdown of the average hospital payment received per covid-19 hospitalizations, with severity distribution. It is estimated that a patient who goes through the approved protocols and ends up dying after being put on a ventilator, it worth around $100K in…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

https://khn.org/news/furor-erupts-billions-going-to-hospitals-based-on-medicare-billings-not-covid-19/

Furor Erupts: Billions Going To Hospitals Based On Medicare Billings, Not COVID-19 In the first round of emergency relief, some states will get more than $300,000 per COVID-19 patient, while hard-hit New York gets just $12,000 per patient. kffhealthnews.org

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here are two more cases of hospital malfeasance, just to establish the pattern. Thousands more match this same pattern. Although I am sure all of those involved with deny it. Valerie

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This 58 year old mother presented to the hospital with difficulty breathing. Upon running some tests it was determined that she has an acute kidney issue. Add this to the fact that she also had COPD. Once admitted, the Dr. Immediately recommended Remdesivir, despite the known…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

She even called 911 but the hospital deemed her unruly and sedated her. Her son got a lawyer involved to exercise his “right to try” ivermectin and high dose vitamins but they denied the request. She was malnourished at this point but then decided to put her on a ventilator and…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Diona

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Diona was very anxious about getting covid from all the media reports and one day wasn’t feeling well. She was having typical flu like symptoms but insisted on going to the hospital. There she didn’t test positive and was sent home with some steroids. A couple days later she…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

At the hospital she tested positive. She was put on oxygen and started an antibiotic but then they were abruptly stopped in favor of you guessed it, Remdesivir. At this point she wasn’t receiving proper nutrition and her oxygen levels began to fall. Her son discovered that she…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

He then demanded a list of medications she was on because he had a bad feeling she was deteriorating quickly. What he learned shocked him. The attending nurse said in addition to Remdesivir and morphine she was also on Baricintinib, Xanax, Klonopin, Ativan, and Precedex. All of…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Notice a pattern? Remdesivir is administered, oxygen levels go down, oxygen is started along with and arthritis medication like Baricintinib that can actually significantly increase infections and cause heart failure which I’ll address shortly. The condition worsens until the…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

All the while being malnourished and given little fluids or vitamins, as well as drugs like morphine that further hinders breathing. Patients are forced to go through this alone with little human contact and eventually succumb to the toxic mixture of chemicals and inhumane…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is the treatment protocol for hospitalization giving by the CDC. http://1.No corticosteroids unless oxygen is needed. 2.If deemed “high risk”, immediately put on poisonous Remdesivir, which cost $3120 per patient. 3.If conventional http://5.At… http://1.No http://5.At…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is a screenshot from the guidelines showing the progression.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The treatment guidelines even mentions the fact that these combinations of drugs can be harmful. “The benefits outweigh the potential risks.”

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a link to the nearly 500 page document issued for treatment guidelines if you’d like to read it yourself: https://files.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/guidelines/covid19treatmentguidelines.pdf

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Another screenshot showing the dangers of Baricintinib. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out this with remdesivir which is known to cause renal failure and a immunosuppressant steroid along with arthritis medication that increases infections and your risk of heart failure,…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

There is even a warning that you run the risk of developing lymphoma or life threatening heart problems.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

All of this taken together brings this to an uncomfortable conclusion. The isolation, the strict protocols of dangerous treatments, the money attached to all of this and the legal immunity add up to a design to harm and profit from it.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

These stories of people I’ve provided are just a drop in the bucket, thousands of families have experienced similar fates. Hospitals fighting tooth and nail to not allow the “right to try” medicines, even ignoring court orders, and calling the police on concerned family members.…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This didn’t even touch on the horrors that occurred in nursing home here and abroad. The use of Midazolam on the elderly, euthanizing aka killing them and the issuance of DNR orders without consent as if these people are animals who just needed to be culled. It’s inconceivable…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

I know many reading this will be offended by that conclusion, especially the doctors and nurses who followed these protocols, and to them I ask, why are you just following one size fits all protocols for human beings? Can you honestly say, you’ve kept your oath?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Is someone’s life worth you keeping your job? Are you that spineless and arrogant that you can’t stand up to these god forsaken administrators and government agencies? Before 2020 any time what happened in Germany was discussed, people would matter of factly say “that could never…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Well, it has and if you were a part of these ungodly protocols, you helped it happen again. It was the Doctors and Nurses who were first to sign on to the genocide in Germany, never forget that fact. These totalitarian murderous protocols and the money attached need to be…

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

“I was just following protocols” isn’t going to be an acceptable excuse.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the Nuremberg courtroom, the trial of 23 Nazi doctors accused of various crimes begins. Karl Brandt, Hitler's personal physician and a high-ranking SS officer, is the main defendant. Another important figure is Siegfried, a former medical chief in the German army. The only female defendant was a physician at Ravensbruck concentration camp. Despite their pleas of not guilty, the future of these accused individuals will be determined by time and evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Taking their places in the famous Nuremberg courtroom, judges of the allied military tribunal begin the trial of minor war criminals. In the dark once occupied by their leaders are 23 nazi doctors accused of many crimes in hospitals, concentration camps and research centers. Number one defendant is Karl Brandt, formerly Hitler's personal position and a general in the Waffen SS. Next in importance is Siegfried a former medical chief of the Wehrmacht. The only woman defendant was a physician in the camp at Ravensbruck. All the accused pleaded not guilty, but time and evidence alone will decide their future.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Trinityaudiobot

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you have found this thread informative please consider giving me a follow so won’t miss any future ones. Like these 👇 https://t.co/DPSWDdMVt9

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a list of all of my threads so far for ease of access. I appreciate the support, more to come. Thread Topics 🧵 1. COVID-19 Vaccines 💉 2. VAERS📉 3. The PCR “Test”🧪 4. Masks 😷 5. Lockdowns 🔒 6. mRNA Approval for Kids 💉 7. Post 💉 Autopsies 8. Excess Death💀

Saved - January 29, 2025 at 2:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the controversial use of Midazolam, particularly in the context of COVID-19 and end-of-life care. While it's included in essential medicines for pain and anxiety, its application raises ethical concerns, especially for the elderly. I note that many early COVID deaths occurred in nursing homes, where treatment protocols may have inadvertently led to lethal outcomes. The government's stockpiling of Midazolam, including a needle-free version, prompts me to question whether we are facing a hidden death plan.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

1) MIDAZOLAM & COVID - In the US, Midazolam is one of the drugs used in lethal injections for those who receive the death penalty in some states. Many in the UK claim that the US death row killer, Midalozam was used to EUTHANIZE many of their elderly. I dive into this.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

2) "Section 2 of the 2019 World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines includes opioid analgesics formulations commonly used for the control of pain and respiratory distress, as well as sedative and anxiolytic substances such as midazolam and diazepam." 4/2020

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

3) The use of Midazolam in combination with other drugs is discussed, but for what purpose? "A patient who is fighting for breath can best be helped using medications that reduce the effort required to breathe and alleviate the fear of dying" https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2020/05/debatt/relieving-sensation-suffocation-patients-dying-covid-19

Relieving the sensation of suffocation in patients dying with COVID-19 22.04.2020: Opinions - Doctors, nurses and family members are giving heartbreaking accounts of acute respiratory distress, panic and a sensation of suffocation in some COVID-19 patients in the terminal phase. tidsskriftet.no

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

4) Please read through the Briefing Notes. Those who are in Respiratory Distress and experiencing Restlessness and Anxiety and Acute Agitation and Delirium.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

5) According to protocols, it does not appear that Midazolam was used as a life saving measure, but yet as an end of life decision. The same punishment that is giving to those on death row in some US states. Conveniently, it would be classified as a COVID death.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

6) Is my comparison to the lethal death penalty dose a fair comparison? If you consider the fact that Midazolam should be carefully used in the ELDERLY under normal circumstances, what kind of precautions should be used in an ELDERLY person with a respiratory illness?

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

7) "Seven studies, documenting the care of 493 patients met the inclusion criteria. Approximately two thirds of patients required a continuous subcutaneous infusion with median doses of 15 mg morphine and 10 mg midazolam in the last 24 h of life." https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02692163211013255

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

8) This discusses Provider Level Availability Issues and how they were working to increase the national stockpile. They EVEN asked Governors of US States that use these drugs in the death penalty to RELEASE their stockpiled drugs. 👈 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7204700/

Availability of Internationally Controlled Essential Medicines in the COVID-19 Pandemic Section 2 of the 2019 World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines includes opioid analgesics formulations commonly used for the control of pain and respiratory distress, as well as sedative and anxiolytic substances such as midazolam ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

9) In 2018 - there were 2 procurements for the National Stockpile of Midazolam - this one in June which was for a continuation of an earlier contract.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

10) This Compounded Pharmaceuticals procurement was in April 2018.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

11) Early on, I was tracking COVID deaths in my area. Many of the early deaths were in nursing homes. Matter of fact, it was two-thirds of early COVID deaths were those in the nursing homes.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

#NursingHome #Austin #COVID19 "The nursing home population in particular is shockingly vulnerable," Dean Johnston told Austin City Council members Tuesday. He said two-thirds of the area’s COVID-19 deaths were among nursing home patients and staff. https://www.kut.org/post/911-calls-illustrate-covid-19s-spread-austin-nursing-homes

911 Calls Illustrate COVID-19's Spread In Austin Nursing Homes "I have a resident. Her temperature is going up and her oxygen is dropping quite low, so the doctor wants to send her out," the caller from Riverside… kut.org

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

12) The numbers change depending on area, but this AARP article claimed that residents and staff of long-term care facilities were 7 times as likely to die of COVID-19. (2/15/2021)

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

13) We all know that officials claimed there was no treatment for COVID, but there was a death plan (identified earlier) for SOME people with COVID. They had a national stockpile of Midalozam as well as Midalozam in the Compounded Form. Who decides what is in the stockpile?

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

14) Project BioShield was established under Pres. Bush and it is responsible for the national stockpiles. This program allows the US GOV to purchase drugs and vaccines to put into a national stockpile in the event of a national emergency. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/bioshield/index.html

Project BioShield Home Page georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

15) The concerning thing now is that they are replenishing Milazopan. This time they are procuring a needle-free version. You know so you won't have to worry about those silly needle marks when you are on your deathbed.

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

16) As part of this contract, BARDA awarded $60 million to Crossject for an initial order of ZENEO® Midazolam as soon as the product is authorized by the FDA. BARDA also has an option for the acquisition of additional units, up to $59 million... https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/06/18/2464968/0/en/CROSSJECT-Agreement-with-BARDA-on-ZENEO-Midazolam.html

CROSSJECT: Agreement with BARDA on ZENEO® Midazolam Press Release Agreement with BARDA on ZENEO® Midazolam   BARDA places a firm order of $60m to CROSSJECT for initial procurement of ZENEO® Midazolam... globenewswire.com

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

17) This project is supported in whole or in part with federal funds from the U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Office of the Asst Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), under Contract No. 75A50122C00031. https://t.co/0YSemPdONz

@CanariesBlue - Blue Canaries (Publius)

18) This mean that you, as a taxpayer, have already paid for needle-free death shot. Have we already been sentenced to death, is the question? https://t.co/ksZIr9SDcX

Saved - August 7, 2023 at 5:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A man defied doctors who predicted his 75-year-old uncle's imminent death due to sepsis. Refusing to administer end-of-life drugs, he cited his mother's euthanasia experience. Nurses left, and his uncle, now recovered, enjoys life. This incident raises concerns about deliberate killings in the NHS. Videos documenting the story: [link1] [link2].

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’m talking to a man who was told last October that his 75-year-old uncle - in hospital after being abused by his carers - was “end of life” and had three days to live. The doctors said he had sepsis and that he was definitely going to die. The man - his uncle’s next of kin - managed to get his uncle home. They’d handed him a big pack of EOL drugs on departure from the hospital and told him he had to administer them to his uncle at home. Nurses came to his home to check whether he was giving the morphine, Midazolam and two other drugs to his uncle and the man told them in no uncertain terms that he had absolutely no intention of giving his uncle those drugs as he knew what they did (his own mum had been euthanised with the same drugs in hospital in 2021) and, after telling him his uncle would “die in pain” without the meds, the nurses left. He never heard from them again. His uncle is now fully recovered and living life to the full. To me, this is solid evidence that the NHS were deliberately killing - or trying to kill - people. @ng16322 @MaajidNawaz @CartlandDavid @davidicke @garethicke @KateShemirani

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the drugs used in palliative care, including midazolam, morphine, and another drug called Lebom. They mention that these drugs were sent to the Ministry of Time in September of the previous year. The speaker suggests that these drugs are causing deaths in octopus, particularly when midazolam and morphine are mixed together. They also mention that the nursing pencil website advises against mixing midazolam and morphine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you can see I'm not boxating you. There's the midazolam, 0 milligram per milliliter. There's the morphine, 1 milliliters. There's the Lebom, whatever that is. That's the third drug I did The palliative care. Let me turn them around. Turn them over, actually. And then there's a forklift that I give And then we've got the midazolam. Now, all these were sent home to the Ministry of Time in September last year. So it is these drugs that are causing the deaths in octopus. Especially midazolam, and the morphine mixed. Now the the nursing pencil website clearly states that midaziram and mopane should not be mixed

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’ve asked him to make a couple of new videos . Here’s the first one. https://t.co/6cJ7E1gM44

Video Transcript AI Summary
On the 21st of Q2, 2023, the patient was in the hospital. From the 14th to the 9th of September 2022, the patient received supportive care. Although it didn't explicitly mention end-of-life cases, the hospital's supportive care package is essentially an end-of-life care plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now this debtors dated 21st of Q2, that's when he was in hospital, 2023. Yet, 14th to 9th 2022, the patient is on supportive care. It didn't say end of life cases supportive. But if you look at the hospital version of supportive care package, it's basically the end of life care plan,

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Here’s the second one. https://t.co/CGBzBkoFKC

Saved - September 12, 2023 at 12:20 AM

@ng16322 - NG16322

#midazolam Matt Hancock authorised NICE Guideline NG163 to euthanise elderly in NHS UK. *Special Considerations* respiratory problems? - give them more midazolam until they DIE #NG163 #CrimesAgainstHumanity #Sunak #ToryBrokenBritain #ToryCriminalsUnfitToGovern #Nuremberg2 #NHS

Saved - September 17, 2023 at 4:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Neil Oliver's recent program on Midazolam deserves praise. He spoke with Emma, a victim's daughter, and MP Andrew Bridgen, who listened to families affected by NICE guideline NG163. Dr. Kendrick's response was dismissive, but Neil showed empathy and handled the situation well. The program shed light on the government protocol's role in the untimely deaths of thousands. #Midazolam #NG163

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Well done to Neil Oliver @thecoastguy for finally doing a programme on Midazolam! A good half an hour was spent talking to Emma, the daughter of a victim (who happened to be sitting next to me at the meeting in Parliament in June) and Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen, the only MP who’s actually listened to the families of people killed by NICE guideline NG163, the government protocol that led to the untimely deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people in hospitals and care homes over the last three years. Dr. Kendrick didn’t do so well - dismissing certain facts as “ridiculous” and laughing inappropriately. Neil looked quite upset by what he was hearing - as any empathetic person would be - but he did well all things considered. @thecoastguy @ABridgen @ng16322 #ng163 #midazolam #euthanasia

@ng16322 - NG16322

#midazolam The elderly were not at END OF LIFE! Crine infections, chest infections, Gout & given midazolam + an opioid It's mass involuntary euthanasia, the NHS Knew, NG163 @GBNEWS @thecoastguy @ABridgen @MaajidNawaz @BingaBong2022 HEROES @jacquideevoy1 #Nuremberg2 #NHS #NG163

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2014, the livable care pathway was abolished due to its harmful nature. In April 2020, Matt Hancock and the NHS authorized NGINICE guideline 163, which some believe caused the accelerated or induced death of patients through the prescription of midazolam and morphine. A gathering was held in June where bereaved relatives shared their distressing experiences of their loved ones' end-of-life care in hospitals. The government was unresponsive to inquiries about the number of elderly and vulnerable individuals moved from hospitals to care homes during the first wave of COVID-19 and the subsequent deaths within specific time frames. Emma will now share her father's story, adding to the numerous accounts of similar experiences over the past year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2014 to get rid of the livable care pathway as being, harmful and and unsuitable. And in April 2020, Matt Hancock and the NHS authorized NGINICE guideline 163, which since then, relatives who've lost their parents and loved ones have come to me and said they believe those guidelines, the prescription of midazolam and morphine, a respiratory suppressant, to people who were already suffering, depressed respiration that it accelerated or caused their death. I held an event in June where 70 bereaved relatives came, and a lot of them had a chance to give very harrowing accounts of their experiences of the relative's end of life in hospital. And, the government didn't seem to want to talk about it. I I wrote the government reasonably I thought some reasonable questions. One of them was how many elderly, vulnerable people were moved out of hospital into care homes to make way for the expected first wave of COVID patients in early 2020 and how many of those had sadly died within 7 days, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days, etcetera of a COVID nineteen, b, other causes, and the government wrote back and said they don't hold that data. So they have they're telling me they have no idea who they moved out of hospital and what happened to them. Which seems extraordinary. And very extraordinary. And Emma's here to tell her story about her father. And, unfortunately, you know, I I've heard far too many of these stories over the last, 12 months. Emma, if I can come to you, what is the story that you would like to
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 8:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Investigative journalist Jacqui Deevoy reveals shocking evidence of euthanasia in UK hospitals and care homes. Despite pitching stories to mainstream editors for years, her claims were largely ignored. However, a recent GB News report shed light on the issue. Deevoy presents extensive evidence, including medical records, drug charts, and testimonies from insiders. She highlights the reintroduction of the Liverpool Care Pathway under a different name, NG163. Assisted suicide remains illegal in the UK, yet thousands are euthanized annually. Deevoy's documentary, "A Good Death," has raised awareness, but mainstream media has been slow to cover the story. The truth must be shared with the public.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

1/2 This morning, I sent this email to 30 mainstream editors and news-desks. I’ll let you know how they respond. “Dear all, As you may remember, for the last three years, I’ve been investigating the euthanasia that’s been blatantly carried out in U.K. care homes and hospitals.  I’ve pitched stories to you on this subject regularly during this time. Most of you have ignored those pitches.  In 2021, I met with Sam Greenhill (news editor at the Daily Mail and cc’ed here) and Stephen Adams (the then medical editor at the Mail on Sunday). Both wanted to run the story but later changed their minds. They decided there wasn’t enough evidence. At the time, I had 16 people willing to speak out. Two years down the line, I have 87, most with incontrovertible evidence - evidence that includes medical records, drug charts and recorded phone calls.  On Saturday, the story finally hit the mainstream. Neil Oliver of GB News finally (after much encouragement from myself and the man who originally came to me with the story) presented a show focusing on this shocking topic. Here’s a link to it:  https://youtube.com/watch?v=o3nsZiiT4YU… For your reference, here’s the pitch I sentto 28 editors in 2021 and updated to include a higher number of case studies and information about a documentary I made: ‘Euthanasia is being used as a medical protocol in UK hospitals and care homes’   Extensive research reveals that the Liverpool Care Pathway, which was abolished in 2014 after being deemed inhumane, was brought back in at the start of the pandemic in early 2020 (NICE guideline NG163) and has since been used in hospitals and care homes across the UK.   Evidence includes the following:   ·      A House Of Commons document (a Hansard script) detailing a conversation between Health Secretary Matt Hancock and Conservative MP Dr. Luke Evans, during which they discuss the use of certain medications - namely the benzodiazepine Midazolam and the opioid morphine- to give Covid patients a “good death”. A good death is medical terminology for euthanasia. (‘Euthanasia means ‘a good death’ in Greek.) ·      A video of the above conversation. ·      Confirmation of Hancock ordering two years’ worth of a sedative called Midazolam from Accord, a French supplier. The order was made in March 2020. It was claimed at the time that the drug was for the treatment of Covid patients. Midazolam suppresses the respiratory system. Covid is a respiratory disease. Midazolam is used as an execution drug in the US. A two-year supply was ordered and was used within nine months.  ·      Quotes from doctors, medical researchers, pathologists and pharmacists confirming what Midazolam is, what it's for and how it should and shouldn’t be used. Evidence from the BNF that benzodiazepines and opioids should never be used concomitantly. ·      Paperwork and links showing the LCP protocol was reintroduced in early 2020. This time around, it wasn’t called the Liverpool Care Pathway - it was called NG163 - but the protocol was identical: the use of a cocktail of drugs (a benzodiazepine and an opioid, usually Midazolam and morphine), along with a withdrawal of food and water and necessary medications, leading to the hastened and untimely death of the patient. ·      Documents (medical records and drug charts) showing the dosage of Midazolam and morphine given to Covid patients and showing how breathlessness in patients is to be managed using these drugs.  ·      Information from anonymous insiders - including lawyers, doctors, care workers and nurses, who’ve seen this abominable practice happening first hand.  ·      A video made by Manchester mayoral candidate Michael Elston, outlining what he knows to be happening with regards to the killing and culling of the elderly using Midazolam.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

2/2 ·      87 case studies who are willing to speak to the Press about their loved ones’ deaths being hastened in hospitals and care homes. One case is historic and occurred whilst the LCP was still in place; the rest have happened in the last three years; three are ‘near miss’ stories - one, when a woman who had nothing wrong with her was put on end of life treatment only to be rescued by her niece at the last minute; a woman who rescued her sister and a man who survived the LCP 13 years ago.   Many people believe it’s acceptable for the sick and elderly to be given a pharmaceutical “helping hand” when they’re in - what’s deemed to be - the final stages of their lives. Few seem to realise that euthanasia (in any form – voluntary or involuntary) is illegal in the UK. If a person is found to be involved in euthanasia, they risk a life sentence. Those found guilty and charged with “assisted suicide” can get 14 years in prison. The problem my case studies have is that NONE of their loved ones were terminally ill and many of them were under 70.    The normalisation of euthanasia has been occurring for years. In 2020, the then health secretary Matt Hancock started to push for the legalisation of assisted suicide. In the last three years, the Assisted Dying bill has been debated in parliament many times. In the meantime, thousands are being euthanised every day. It’s been reported that around 130,000 people are euthanised in hospitals, hospices and care homes every year. Many medics know this is happening but turn a blind eye.  In 2021, due to the papers refusing to run any stories on this subject, I made a documentary: ‘A Good Death?’ It’s been seen by millions since it premiered and has woken up many people to what went on behind the locked doors of hospitals and care homes during the pandemic. Here’s a direct link to the film: https://www.ickonic.com/Watch/1163 In recent months, one broadsheet editor has approached me, wanting to hear more, but they’re moving very slowly and haven’t published anything yet.  If you’re interested in being the first paper to break this story, I’d be happy to help you. (As some of you will know, I’ve been a freelance journalist for 38 years and have written hundreds of articles for the national newspapers.) Since I first sent this pitch, I’ve written many articles for non-mainstream news outlets and have been interviewed for internet radio and TV shows on at least 50 occasions.  I hope now that, in the light of the GB News report, you’re interested in my work and that you’ll see how important it is to get this story out there. Your readers need to know the truth. Looking forward to hearing from you. Regards, Jacqui Deevoy

Saved - September 20, 2023 at 10:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A heart valve operation was postponed due to Covid restrictions. Tablets given to the patient were actually morphine, forcibly administered. The patient's condition deteriorated, and he attempted suicide. He later died, with hospital-acquired frailty contributing to his death. Legal action was considered but deemed challenging.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

Another tragic story received today… “My father-in-law, aged 76, was admitted to Preston hospital for a heart valve operation, which was postponed due to Covid restrictions. The hospital said they would keep him there until a transfer to a second hospital was possible where a heart specialist would undertake the op. They kept him for three weeks. During this time we began receiving the frantic phone calls and text messages. He said the tablets given to him that he was told were ‘water tablets’ were actually 270 Morphine Sulphate Logo (Actavis), which he described as having a crescent moon logo on them. He was holding them in his mouth and then spitting them into his sock later, but the staff noticed and forced him to swallow the pills. He was sending us desperate texts asking us to get him out of there. He understood exactly what they were doing to him. Each time we rang the hospital, they assured us all was well. They wouldn’t allow visits due to Covid so we had to take their word for it. He was eventually transferred to the second hospital where the surgeon declined the op due to the patient’s emaciated state. The surgeon later held a meeting with us where he expressed his utter disbelief at the physical condition of my father in law, having seen him just weeks prior to arrange the op. The doctor also said he couldn’t understand how he had been sent to him in such terrible condition and that he was a ‘different man’ to the one he had spoken to a few weeks before. My father-in-law was then returned to the first hospital, but there were no more phone calls and text messages from him. He was too weak to make contact. When we were called one morning and told there had been an ‘incident’ overnight, we were naturally very worried. We were told we couldn’t visit but my wife and I went to the hospital and barged in. We needed to see how he was and see for ourselves what physical state he was in. We managed to get to his ward. He told us he’d tried to kill himself the previous night by throwing himself out of the bed head-first onto the floor. He said 'you should have come three weeks ago… it's too late now' - words that will haunt me for ever. We then saw a nurse talking into a walkie-talkie, calling security. We didn’t want to be physically ejected from the hospital so we decided to leave peacefully. Before leaving, we demanded his release into our care by the next morning. The following morning however, at 9:20am we were informed by telephone that after an ‘episode’, he had become unresponsive and died. No further details were given then, and none are known to this day, although the doctor who informed us of his passing admitted ‘mistakes have been made’ and was very apologetic. According to the death certificate, his (hospital-acquired) frailty contributed to his death. That’s all we know or were ever allowed to know. I cannot say definitively that the drugs killed him, but they were definitely forcibly administered when not required and when he didn’t want them. I have the full and unexpurgated version of this story, including times, dates, names and greater detail. My intention was to take legal action and I did actually take advice from a barrister. He said that my claim was valid but, in his experience, the NHS would put up an exhausting and dirty fight for which we are ill-equipped to endure.”

Saved - September 21, 2023 at 1:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former health secretary Matt Hancock implemented the controversial NG163 Covid protocol despite doctors' warnings. Nine doctors and two professors expressed concerns about the risks and lack of evidence-based dosages. The guideline lacked advice on monitoring patients and weaning them off powerful medications. Nurses were instructed to administer drugs regardless of respiratory depression fears. The combination of benzodiazepines and opioids raised concerns about potentially lethal effects. Many healthcare professionals followed orders, but their obedience may not protect them legally.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I’ve sent this to 30 mainstream newspaper editors. Reckon they’ll publish it? Hancock’s deadly Covid protocol was slammed by doctors in 2020… but he implemented it anyway By Jacqui Deevoy When former health secretary Matt Hancock first came up with NG163 (the Covid protocol reminiscent of the abolished Liverpool Care Pathway that was used to treat the elderly and those presenting with respiratory issues in hospitals and care homes) in early 2020, he was quickly presented with the advice of nine doctors and two professors, all of whom were familiar with end of life care procedure. After studying it, they said they were “concerned that uncritical use of NG163 may create unintended risks for people with suspected or actual COVID-19 infection” and suggested that it shouldn’t be implemented. The new guideline replaced NG31, which detailed how to deal with people dying of cancer. The doctors pointed out that, with regards to the old guideline, the evidence base was so poor that specific dosages were not recommended. They seemed confused by the fact that dosages recommended in NG163 were so specific. In a letter, published on April 20th 2020, the eminent experts, led by Professor Emeritus Sam H. Ahmedzai, point out that “while NG163 states ‘Note that symptoms can change, and patients can deteriorate rapidly in a few hours or less’, there is no counterpoint that most patients without the preconditions above will eventually recover.” They also state that, while there was plenty of detail on dosing up Covid patients with powerful medications, there’s no advice on monitoring the patients nor on weaning them off the drugs. Could that be because there was never any intention of weaning them off? Another major concern of the panel was the fact that NG163 states: “Sedation and opioid use should not be withheld because of a fear of causing respiratory depression.” This is probably the most frightening line ever to be written into a NICE guideline as it’s telling nurses not to be put off giving the prescribed drugs due to a fear that the patient’s breathing will dramatically slow down. They’re being told to disregard any concerns and administer the drugs anyway. Doctors prescribing the meds - and many of the nurses giving them - KNOW that using Midazolam and morphine together will slow down breathing (to the point of death if it’s administered continuously via a syringe driver) but this very clear instruction is telling them not to worry about that! How many medics administered this killer cocktail of ‘end of life drugs’ to patients, not all of whom were presenting with respiratory symptoms - or, in some cases, appearing to have nothing more than a positive result from a non-diagnostic, not fit-for-purpose PCR test - knowing it was going to kill them? Some doctors and nurses have since admitted wondering about the potentially lethal effect of this combination of benzodiazepines and opioids and knew that the doses they were giving were way too high (something else that was a point of concern in the letter), but very few spoke out and the vast majority just continued to follow orders. Sadly, as we know from the Nuremberg Trials, the excuse of “just following orders” does not stand up in court. (And, whether they knew the dangers of what they were doing or not, court is where many of these obedient ‘angels of death’ will end up.) (More to follow in comments below.)

Saved - December 10, 2023 at 2:56 AM

@biologyphen0m - D

Scottish COVID inquiry|Day 21 part-4 'they found my father on his hands and knees trying to get to the toilet' 'I was then told they were going to introduce end of life medication which would be MIDAZOLAM and if needed MOPRHINE' 'i was SHOCKED !' Cause of death COVID-19 https://t.co/qUDdVO1tMi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker received a phone call saying their dad was feeling unwell. They were told that their dad was agitated and had been shouting for help. They found him on his hands and knees trying to get to the toilet. The care home said they would introduce end-of-life medication, which shocked the speaker. They were allowed to visit their dad, but only at the door while wearing full PPE. They were not sure if their dad was COVID negative or if the restriction was to limit staff exposure. They were only able to see their dad lying on his side in bed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Paragraph 76. Yes. You got a phone call saying your dad is feeling? Yes. Where did he been found? Speaker 1: Well, on his notes that I got from the care home as well, I got a phone call from the care room to say that my dad was failing. He was agitated. He'd been shouting for help. He'd been wandering into other rooms so he was still mobile but found him on his hands and knees trying to get to the toilet. I was then told they were going to introduce End of life medication which would be midazolam and if needed, and morphine and I was shocked. Speaker 0: But you were told you could come and see your dad? Speaker 1: I then got an opportunity because of that date. My father died on the 26th April and the impression that I got is that he was something serious had happened and he was now in a comatose state and you might only have a couple of days to go. And I was told I could go in fully PPE ed, I'd see it with Father, but I would only be allowed to stand at the door. Now, I don't understand this because I don't know if he was COVID negative by then Or maybe they wanted to be me going in and other staff, but all I'd be allowed to do is look at Medard lying on his side in his bed. That was all I was like to believe I was able Speaker 0: what
Saved - December 17, 2023 at 3:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
According to nurse whistleblower Lesley Roberts, the NG163 protocol issued by NICE instructed doctors and nurses to prescribe a dangerous combination of drugs to COVID-19 patients. Roberts believes this protocol led to the deaths of many patients, as their breathing difficulties were further suppressed by the drugs, ultimately causing their demise. The use of these drugs, not COVID-19 itself, is blamed for their deaths.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

NURSE WHISTLEBLOWER LESLEY ROBERTS ON 2020 "COVID DEATHS" IN NHS SCOTTISH HOSPITALS: "If they had breathing difficulties then their breathing was being suppressed even further by the drugs and it was this that then killed them, not Covid." The death protocol: Covid whistleblower Lesley Roberts believes this one medical blunder cost thousands of lives "It relates to the NG163 'end of life' protocol from NICE, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. It was issued to doctors and nurses across the UK on April 3, 2020 and remained in place until March 21, 2021 According to Ms Roberts and other healthcare campaigners, NG163 essentially told medics to prescribe a deadly cocktail of powerful drugs to people in hospital and elsewhere who had been diagnosed with an advanced case of Covid-19. She said: "It should never have been considered. People who were not at the end of their lives were brought to the end because of those drugs. If they had breathing difficulties then their breathing was being suppressed even further by the drugs and it was this that then killed them, not Covid." #Midazolam

Saved - January 19, 2024 at 1:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
During the UK pandemic, many were given Midazolam without consent, resulting in deaths falsely labeled as "covid deaths." Similar to Remdesivir in the US, these actions were driven by profit and convenience. Few are aware of these atrocities committed for profit.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Know the truth about what happened. WATCH: “The Good Death: Euthanasia In The UK” During the “pandemic” in the UK people were unnecessarily given Midazolam, many without their family members knowledge. This killed people who were then marked as “covid deaths”, just like Remdesivir and the deadly protocols in the US. Most people are oblivious to these horrors perpetrated on innocent people for no other reason than profit and expediency. #3tablets

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was introduced in the 1990s to provide end-of-life care in hospitals. While it aimed to improve comfort and dignity, there were controversies surrounding its implementation. Families reported treatments being removed too quickly and patients being put on the LCP without consent. In 2013, the LCP was scrapped in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, but concerns remain that similar practices continue under different names. There are allegations that the sedative midazolam, which suppresses the respiratory system, is being used inappropriately on COVID-19 patients, potentially leading to premature deaths. Whistleblowers have raised concerns about the lack of consultation and the normalization of euthanasia in care homes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It looked to me like he was battling for life. It looked like he wasn't ready to let go. And afterwards, I mean, I I left knowing that something profoundly wrong had happened to odd witness, something deeply wrong. And that's when I started to pursue it myself. I applied for his records. Speaker 1: These are the guidelines To an NHS care pathway that was devised in the late 19 nineties. Here, it's entitled the Liverpool Care Pathway. It's also often referred to as the pathway to death. Speaker 2: A a a good death needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs, the staff to administer it. Speaker 3: Just under half of us die in a hospital. Good end of life or palliative care is designed to make that last experience as comfortable and dignified as possible. The Liverpool Care Pathway or LCP, introduced in the nineties In England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland was meant to make that easier. Among other things, they introduced a checklist. Think of it as Prompts the hospital staff to help them work out if drugs, fluids, and invasive tests can be stopped. Those kinds of treatments can be painful or unhelpful in the last stages of life. The pathway often worked well. But when it went wrong, it was extremely controversial. There were reports treatments being removed too quickly. Some families said their loved ones have been left without food or water. The most damaging complaint was around communication. Some patients were being put on the LCP without anyone giving permission. Some families only found out about it after a loved one had passed away. Speaker 4: Jane Boborek, whose father would have survived And returned home had he not been placed on the Liverpool care pathway, joins us now. Speaker 0: He had life left in him yet. And when I saw him in the bed deteriorating, I presumed, and it was presented to me as this as this was part of his conditions, his medical condition, the tear deterioration was actually due to that. Well, that I I found out from the report and from my research that it wasn't. No. That dehydration was to be likely cause and the removal of his routine medications. Speaker 5: When they mentioned, we're going to place your mom on the pathway, and I asked what the path hospital. It's something that we do to make mom more comfortable. So we we sort of looked at each other and said, well, It's gonna make mom more comfortable than, yeah, not knowing what it was. If we would have known beforehand, then she wouldn't have been placed on the pathway. Speaker 6: It's estimated around 90,000 people die every year After being placed on the LCP on the NHS, people with a whole range of illnesses are put on the pathway. Relatives claim their loved ones have been starved and dehydrated. Speaker 7: I asked questions. Why is my dad like this? And they just kept saying to me, your dad's dying. Your dad's not very well. Speaker 6: Sammy was placed on the pathway not by his consultant, professor Pulicino, But by doctors on a weekend team. Speaker 7: It wasn't time for him to go. I did mention to the nurse or did say to them, my dad's not a number. He's my dad. He's a husband, a granddad, and I wanted my dad home with us. Speaker 6: You said my dad isn't a number. Why do you think that was relevant to that phrase? Speaker 7: Because I didn't want them to kill my dad off. Speaker 6: It was at this point that professor Pulicino arrived at the hospital. Speaker 8: I went off for the weekend one Friday. When I came back in the On a Monday morning, I found that, he was extremely drowsy, and he wouldn't respond. I said, well, what's happened to this patient? And they said, well, he's been put on the Liverpool Care Pathway. So then I looked into it And saw what treatments he was on, which were totally inappropriate for his situation. And, I I said that, it should be stopped. Speaker 6: I'm looking through the hospital notes here into Sammy's case. Now What they show is that there was a serious disagreement between professor Policino and other doctors and nurses. They had decided that the LCP was the best way forward for Sammy. But less than 2 weeks after hospital. He'd been taken off the pathway. His condition had improved. Professor Policino removed him from that pathway. And then, what is it? 10, 11 days later, your dad is sitting in a chair watching television. Speaker 7: Recovering from what he smiling, speaking. It was just my dad back. Speaker 3: After all the controversy, in 2013, the government scrapped the Liverpool Care Pathway in England. It's also being phased Out in Scotland and Northern Ireland. It should be replaced by individual end of life plans tailored to the patient and discussed with their relatives. But the debate isn't over. Critics in the medical profession say some hospitals have simply rebranded the LCP, giving us a different name But continuing many of the same practices. Speaker 1: After it was reported that hospitals were being set targets of patients to put on end of life care, and we're receiving financial payouts for meeting those targets. And after an outcry from the families of victims, the Liverpool Care Pathway was supposed to have been phased out in 2014, but the practice continued. And this year, involuntary euthanasia has been reintroduced as part of NHS England's response To the COVID 19 pandemic. Speaker 2: With that, I mean, a a a good death needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs, staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to Deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away. Yes. We do. Speaker 1: It's encouraged doctors To end patients' lives prematurely without their consent and without their knowledge, Patients are usually sedated with morphine and midazolam via the use of a syringe driver and are deprived of nutrition and fluids until they eventually die From starvation or dehydration? Speaker 2: With that, that's the the syringes drug liver medication, particularly things like and morphine, do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered? Yes. Speaker 1: This document is NHS England's directive to doctors from this year. It includes a dialogue which doctors are advised to give to patients And to families of patients to manipulate them into consenting to end of life care when it is against their wishes. And it informs doctors of new laws allowing them to end the patients' lives even when it is against their wishes And stipulating that any COVID 19 related death will not have an inquest. Every time COVID 19 is written on a death certificate, That death does not get investigated. What's more, This year, victims' families were often not permitted to visit hospitals during the final days of life, And so most of them still don't know that this is what happened. Speaker 9: You're an independent or Should I see a freelance journalist who has been doing some amazing work exposing the mistreatment of elderly in care homes since the heart Since the start of the whole COVID scandemic as it's become known. But since we last spoke in March, I believe, about 3 months ago, information has come, to you, I believe, about something that takes it to a whole new disturbing level of what what's actually going, and this relates to a specific kind of drug. So I wonder if you could share with the audience the information, that you found and how how you came across it? Speaker 10: What we did find out was that at the start of the pandemic last year, new pathway pathway was, brought back in. It was a directive from the government to the NHS. And when we examined that, it was Pretty much identical to the Liverpool care pathway. So, that was a bit of a shock. Looking to it further, we came across a House of Commons document which detailed the conversation between health secretary Matt Hancock conservative MP, doctor Luke Evans, of certain medications to give patients Good day. Speaker 11: Mister Hancock, hi. You're live on good morning, Britta. I know it's been a while since you've spoken to us, but great news this morning about the vaccine. What what could you tell us? Speaker 12: Well, this is, When will you Speaker 11: come on and talk to Pearson, Zana? Speaker 13: Oh, it's How about tomorrow? Speaker 11: As soon Speaker 8: as we we we Speaker 13: I'll come on as soon Speaker 11: as possible. Tomorrow. We'll make a a special slot for you tomorrow. Speaker 13: I I, Speaker 11: Running order, it's entirely clear. Just Very kind Speaker 14: of you. Unfortunately, I have got something in the diary tomorrow morning, hospital. Speaker 13: Awful lot of work to do to get this vaccine rolled out. Speaker 11: This Is this vaccine the the the news we've been waiting for then? I Speaker 15: It is a very good day, Matt Hancock, and you have every reason to smile. Speaker 14: It's just wonderful, isn't it, watching that? Watching the the images of, of Margaret and and then I've seen a few others, William Shakespeare, the second person, and, and, it looks so look such a small thing just having that jab in the arm, but it means so much Because this is the route out of this pandemic, and, by god, we need one. Speaker 11: If I may, Halsley, you wanna play a little clip from William Shakespeare, Who's just said his first words? Let's take a listen to this. Who wants to be patient number 2? Speaker 12: Grand grand break, you're up big. Speaker 11: I mean, just simple words there, reacting it. You're quite emotional about that. Well, it's just, it's been, You know, it's been such a tough Speaker 14: year for so many people and there's William Shakespeare putting it so simply for everybody that, You know, we can get on with our lives. And and, you know, there's still a few months to go. I've still got this worry that We can't blow it now, Piers. We we've still got to get the vaccine to millions of people, and so we've got to keep sticking by the rules. But How Speaker 16: odd that he's called William Shakespeare. Speaker 14: I know. Speaker 15: Or perhaps that wasn't a coincidence. I mean, we've had Speaker 11: a lot of viewers who've been feeling very emotional watching this because it is it's not just the light at at the Speaker 16: end of the tunnel. It's us beginning to come out Speaker 11: of the tunnel, which is the crucial thing. Speaker 13: That step closer to protection from this awful disease. Speaker 12: Let's do Buckle. Speaker 10: Thank Yeah. I mean so if we go back to the the conversation between Evans and Hancock, this is March last year, I believe. Yeah. So right at the start of the pandemic, they were talking about, the use of certain medications For COVID patients to have a good death, now People would argue might argue, well, a good death means a peaceful death, you know, and, like, maybe if you die in your sleep, that's a good death. But if you study the video, Evan slips up, and he actually uses one word. He's got it over here. He actually says, Quote. Again, a good death needs 3 things, equipment, medication, and the staff to administer it. Speaker 2: A Good death needs 3 things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs, the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment Right. Speaker 10: Now the word that that you that it turns out there is needs. Now what does that mean? If you're having a a good death, let's say There's such a thing. You might die in your sleep. Well, that doesn't need anything, does it? No. The rest of the quote says, it says, a good death needs 3 things, equipment, medication, and the to administer it. So you don't need you don't have a a death isn't administered. No. So that's strange. And then he says, on equipment This is what he says to Matt Hancock. On equipment, do you have enough Do Speaker 2: you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver Medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away. Speaker 10: And Matt Hancock says Speaker 13: Yes. We do. There was a challenge raised about this, about 8 days ago, and we resolved actually, it wasn't so as big a challenge as as was made public, and we've we've resolved that. So, yes, right now, we do. Speaker 10: So there's this short conversation. It goes on a bit further. Then they ask, they ask professor Van Tam Whether he'd like to add anything to what they said, and he just says, thank you. I have nothing really to add on that, which is quite Alarming because any person with half a brain would want to add something to that or ask a question, but that's him. Sounds like him just saying, no. I don't wanna get involved in this. You're quite clear what's going on there. There's almost this sort of, you remember when you're Speaker 17: a teenager and you used Speaker 10: to speak in code language and think that your mom wouldn't understand? Of course, she, of course, will understand. It's like that. They're like a pair of public school We're teenagers thinking no one understands what we're talking about. Oh, aren't we amazing? You know? So that and I could see that it was rehearsed as well, totally rehearsed and scripted, so that wasn't a casual conversation. The next thing as evidence, we have, confirmation of Matt Hancock ordering 2 years' worth of of of midazolam, which is a sedative. Speaker 2: Midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered? Yes. And we've got Speaker 13: a big project to make sure that, those sorts of medications as well as the ITU medications that I spoke about earlier, The the supply chains global supply chains for those medicines are are clear. They are in fact, though those Medicines are made in a relatively small number of factories around the world. So it is a delicate supply chain, and we are contact with the whole supply chain. Speaker 2: And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused, So I have to prescribe it for mister Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a health care home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine. Have you considered relaxing the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and health care professionals so that there isn't waste? Speaker 13: That's something that we keep under review. I've looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of pee medicines. Speaker 10: We ordered this from a French supplier Yeah. In March 2020. It was claimed at the time that the drug was for the treatment of COVID patients. Now If you know anything about midazolam or even if you just look it up, it will tell you straight away that midazolam, suppresses the respiratory system. COVID is a respiratory disease. My daslim is also used as an execution drug in the US. Yeah. Speaker 17: So recently, there have been concerns that executions by lethal injection, which are supposed to be quick and painless, Aren't either. Typically, executions are done with 3 drugs given in stages. So the first drug is an anesthetic, and it's supposed to anesthetize the inmate. The second drug is called the paralytic, and it's supposed to keep the inmate from flailing around. And then the third drug is supposed to stop the heart. Executioners used to use a drug called Sodium Thiopental as that first drug, as the anesthetic, but then the only company that made it in the United States stopped making it. So they went to Europe and said, can we get it from you? But European drug companies said, no. We are not going to sell it to you if it's going to be used for the purpose of executing inmates. So since they haven't able to use the sodium thiopental for the executions. They've gone to another anesthetic. This one is called Midazolam. And in 3 executions, there might have been some problems with it. Instead of going quickly and painlessly, witnesses who watched the execution said that inmates were Gasping or snorting or making choking sounds. And at least in one execution, that the inmate was actually speaking. Speaker 18: There was babe in her head, You know, wetting her lips. And she opened her eyes, and she looked at me and said, I'm hungry. So at this point, I got I was really, really, you know, Emotional. Speaker 5: She said, I fooled you all. You know, I'll frighten you all to death. She said, I know I've been asleep for 3 days. She knew we just sat and talked and reminisced about old times. Speaker 6: Margaret's condition suddenly got worse, And she died the following day. The family are planning to make a complaint. The hospital told them they didn't think anything would have changed the outcome. Speaker 17: So now using this new drug combination has raised some questions about whether it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and whether it might be unconstitutional. But in June of 2015, the US Supreme Court upheld the use of midazolam for lethal injection and executions. The court said that the prisoners challenging its use didn't established that a massive dose of midazolam entailed a substantial risk of severe pain. Speaker 10: Why would you give A medication that suppresses the respiratory system for a respiratory disease, why do you give it to a person with a respiratory disease? It make it makes no sense. I've said that I've said that I've said that sentence about a 1000000 times in the last year. It makes no sense. This is another thing that makes sense. Now People try and defend it by saying, oh, well, it's useful when people get really agitated or say they like really coughing or getting themselves in a state because they're so ill. We'll give them a bit of that to calm down. Now the people I've spoken to, the people who've had relatives, who've been put on midazolam, have told me that, number 1, in many cases, they they didn't have COVID. In other cases, they weren't agitated or outwardly ill. They might be in for a bladder infection or something, you know, you're in infection or whatever. They weren't agitated. And in a in a well, in a few cases so far, people have been given it while they're unconscious, so that doesn't make any sense at all. I've seen, drug charts from various people now that they've managed to obtain, which shows that that their relative was was given, This powerful sedative while they're already unconscious that you know? Speaker 6: It's a year since Marian Hague died. Widower Leslie and granddaughter Alison are making a special trip to her grave. There. Speaker 10: Stand over there. Give me a couple Speaker 19: of minutes, granddad. Speaker 6: Patients are meant to be put on the LCP by a team, yet Marion's hospital records show the decision was made by a single consultant. She was also unconscious. And like more than 3 quarters of patients on the pathway, she wasn't consulted or couldn't be told about it. Speaker 8: But he he just said, your wife's dying. And I said, and I could it was shock. I couldn't believe it. Speaker 6: 4 days later, Mariam was transferred to a hospice and later placed on a syringe driver that automatically administers drugs. The family recollect being told she would not need food or water. At one point, they were allowed to give her a medicated sponge. Speaker 19: And she's clamped down. You know, this was a person who's unconscious. Slapped down like that on this slip, and Speaker 7: they couldn't get it out of their mouth, could they? Speaker 10: And then I knew she was Still with us and was desperate for fluid. Speaker 6: Marion died after 12 days on the Liverpool care pathway. Speaker 20: They didn't give my wife much hope at all. About the second day in, I I was ready to write a note to the nurses to just kinda take me off I had a lot of confusion going on. Wasn't sure how I'd gotten to where I was. I had actually developed ICU delirium. Speaker 21: We used to think we're doing these patients a favor by keeping them completely sedated and in a medically induced coma so that they wouldn't have any memory of this difficult time. But that kind of backfired because, unfortunately, they often do have memories, but they're false memories. They took real life, stimulus and turned them into something really, really scary. Speaker 9: Doesn't make so would it would it also be used in conjunction with morphine, or in isolate? Yes. Speaker 2: So Like a cocktail. Yeah. Yeah. Midazolam and morphine. Speaker 10: Also, there's the problem with titration. So when someone is given, well, any kind of drug, especially a sedative, you don't really know how quickly they're gonna react, so you start with a tiny amount. Sure. Sure. Maybe, like, half a milligram or something. And usually half a milligram for an old very old frail person, and most of these people tend to be old, if not frail. You know, half a milligram will really calm them down. If that doesn't really work, then you give another half a milligram. Speaker 22: Bedazolam is a Benzodiazepine commonly used as an induction agent during rapid sequence induction and intubation because of its relatively rapid onset Compared to other Benzodiazepines, for a 70 kilogram male, they would receive a 14 milligram dose as an IV push for induction. Speaker 10: But a lot of these people have gone into hospital, and and it seemed that they're given a big dose straight away. And invariably, that dose knocks them out completely. Speaker 22: Keep in mind that midazolam is also commonly used as a medication for other reasons, such as in procedural sedation, procedures, and anxiolysis. Speaker 10: So if you're using it to sedate a patient, then that's job done, really, isn't it? Mhmm. Knock Now how much more sedate can you get? So to then continue administering these injections while the person is unconscious, You'd ask, well, why would they do that? And there seems to me to be only one answer, and it's not very palatable To say that, you know, all the doctors and nurses are murderers, I think that would be a bit extreme. Yeah. Absolutely. What happened was there was a new this new protocol was brought in, by bureaucrats, you know, by the men in the suits, passed down to the doctors, passed down to the nurses. And at the time, a lot of nurses, doctors were questioning it, obviously. And a lot of these, doctors and nurses Decided to speak out. I mean, when I tell people about this story, they say, well, why didn't someone say something? Well, they did. What what people are saying was, well, I didn't on the telly or newspapers. No. You won't because they don't want this sort of stuff to get out. So these people are silenced or invariably sacked. And I know plenty of, nurses and care home workers who were either sacked for speaking out or who chose to leave, because they couldn't, understand or abide the the, the new protocols that they knew in their hearts Then suddenly, they they go quiet, you know, or or they're silenced in one way or another. You definitely won't hear their stories on mainstream TV or newspapers. So, this pathway that was identical identical to livable care pathway, was brought back in. We've got the documents showing that. Also, got documents showing the dosage of midazolam that was recommended for COVID patients. I've got a document showing how to manage breathlessness in patients, by using midazolam. I've also collected information from anonymous insiders, lawyers, doctors, care workers, nurses. We've seen this happening firsthand. And then, we found a video by Mayor or candidate Michael Elston, did you see his video? Speaker 1: No. Let us make no mistake about it. This is now the most terrible tragedy in British history And it's still going on every day in NHS hospitals. Speaker 10: And he He was outlining in his video what he knows to be happening with regards to the killing and culling of the elderly Using, this particular drug, mabasinam. Speaker 1: All 3 major political parties know about this, And all 3 have been complicit. Speaker 10: The the normalization of euthanasia has been very kind of slowly been occurring for for years. And and just in last month, Matt Hancock started to push for the legalization of assisted suicide. What's what's all that about? Speaker 9: It doesn't appear to be a a coincidence, does it? It's a interesting timing. Is this still in use now, my dad's a lamb? Is this policy still in play now? Speaker 10: Yes. Right. Absolutely. Yeah. Speaker 9: That's absolutely shocking. Speaker 10: So so one of the reasons, Yeah. Speaker 8: And one Speaker 10: of the reasons I'm, you know, speaking out about it is, so it so it stops. It has to be stopped. Speaker 9: Absolutely. Speaker 10: It's murder. Speaker 9: Yeah. Speaker 10: And and, you know, one of the weird things that a lot a lot of people I've spoken to who've who've been through this, whose relatives have been victims, have said That's the staff at the hospices or care homes or hospitals always know when their loved one's going to die. So they say, Oh, you better come in. They're gonna die in a couple of hours. Well, they don't say it just like that. They say, oh, she hasn't got long to go. Now in life, unless you're about to kill someone, You don't know when someone's gonna die. No. You have no idea. And death is generally a very slow process. You don't go from being perfectly fine one day to being dead the next day Unless you've been killed or unless you've had a terrible accident. So for them well, of course, they know. Because if you're administering Certain doses to a certain size person or a certain age person. Speaker 9: You'll know. Yeah. Speaker 10: How long it takes. It takes Of course. It takes between, 2 to 3 days, generally, sometimes longer. But, they always seem to know. And and I don't even know this because I mentioned it, when I was talking to Gareth that, it just suddenly why why was I so sort of felt so, sort of, passionate about it, and it was a subconscious thing. I suddenly realized that that's that's what happened to my mom 12 years ago. Oh my gosh. She was sitting up and quite bright, but they were doing some they were sit they were putting something in her arm, you know, and I thought didn't think anything of it really. I just said, alright, mom. And she and she was quite chirpy. And then within a minute, she closed her eyes, and I thought, well, it's a bit rude. I've just arrived, and she's gone to sleep. Oh, well, she must be tired. And then she never opened her eyes again. She died, 2 days later. And, The day before she died, I said to one of the nurses, what is that thing in her arm? You know? What what's in it? And I thought it was just like a A nutritional drip or something like that, you know, to keep her hydrated or whatever, because she wasn't hydrated at all. I kept putting little bits of water in her mouth. It was a strange sort of, a strange sort of, sleep she was in because she wasn't asleep because She was trying to speak all the time. She was making grunting noises and trying to speak and, but she couldn't move, obviously. Her mouth could barely move. The hallucinations were just unbelievable and so real. Speaker 23: They're not nightmares. They're memories. Speaker 20: Even when you're sedated, it's not like you're asleep. There is a level of consciousness. Speaker 24: The muted sort of Restful, peaceful look that some folks can mistaken for their resting, their sleeping when in fact their brain is on fire. Speaker 23: Their brain globally, what's happening is cells aren't working Right. They're not getting enough oxygen or blood pressure or food, for example, and those cells start to go awry. Speaker 21: So you can imagine you get critically ill. You didn't plan it, so you just wake up in a medication induced haze. You You've got a tube down your throat. Your wrist may be tied. There's nobody around you that you know. Under any other conditions, that would be considered torture. And, Speaker 10: and the nurse when I asked what was it, the nurse said, oh, it's just, some, morphine And just a little, you know, mixture of stuff to to keep her comfortable and and to make sure she's not in any pain. And I thought, oh, isn't that lovely? Then I thought after she went out of the room, well, my mom wasn't in pain anyway. She wasn't actually in pain. So that's strange, but I thought, oh, well, you know, at least At least she's not, you know, suffering. But she clearly was suffering because she was really struggling trying trying to speak to me and wasn't able to. I'm saying, I asked the nurse when she came in again, are you putting more and more in each time or something? What's happening? You know? And what what's going on? Because why is she in this sort of semi coma? And she said, no. No. It's just she said it's 10 milligrams stuck in my head. She said it's not a very high dose. But Looking back now, 10 milligrams is a high dose. Yeah. 1 of the people I spoke to, when he showed an expert, anesthetist The anesthetist said that that was it was enough to kill an elephant. So why they would have been given this poor person Such a massive dose. And in in this particular case, when he was already unconscious because the first, shots knocked him out. The you know, I can't think of any other reason for that apart from the tranecillium. Speaker 23: If you had to design an experiment to make delirium as bad as it could be, COVID is it. You're not only do you have more drugs, a longer illness, but now you have absence of family and absence of mobility, which are 2 of the main things that reduce delirium. So we really have a worry that we're gonna have this massive public health problem. COVID is essentially the Liran factory. Speaker 12: Look. There there isn't, obviously, a call to examine all of these DNR orders during the pandemic. And we've gotta put this in context, haven't we? This has been a hugely challenging and unprecedented crisis. What will such an inquiry actually achieve, in the long term? Because lessons are being learned, and we absolutely pray that this, Virus will be over, hopefully, at the beginning in well, halfway through next year maybe. Speaker 25: I think what we need to look at is This inquiry is not an inquiry. I don't count the CQC looking at this as an inquiry by any stretch of the imagination. Yes. It's unprecedented what's happened. But, you know, what was happening in Italy and Spain, there were great lessons to be learned there. We were in contact with care workers from Italy and Spain. Why why couldn't the government learn lessons about what happened there and foresee what was gonna happen? And in the second wave, they've done nothing Different. They've just allowed the same calamity and the same human rights abuses to continue unchecked. And where you can make mistakes In the first wave. In the second wave, you're talking about deliberate inaction. Speaker 12: You're saying that this is too little, too late, the Care Quality Commission Yeah. Looking into this. And yet and yet there is talk of, obviously, obviously, us facing a 3rd wave. Lessons simply haven't been learned. The state of what's going on in care homes is still just as bad you're saying? Speaker 25: I think that we as a country need to look at our attitude to to people in care anyway, full stop, because, you You know, there's been a blind eye turned to this. It's not the headline news in many of the mainstream media. You've covered the issue very well, I must say. But it's just not been considered for what it is. Now if somebody, if there was a national disaster tomorrow a plane crash and hundreds of people were killed. You know, the the names and the faces of those people would be everywhere. But what's happening inside care homes is horrendous. Speaker 10: So and I've, I've spoken to other whistleblowers about this, and one doctor, Cardiologist told me, in great detail that, about DMRs and how they're put on Pretty much anyone over 60, you know, just seem to be ancient and decrepit. And, anyone who's physically disabled, Anyone who's mentally disabled, anyone who's got any neurological or psychological problem or mental health issue. You know, she gave me the example of the young woman who has, schizophrenia. She had a DNR put on it purely because of that. So it all it almost reminds me of the the whole t four thing in Nazi Germany, doesn't it? The whole, Eugenics Mhmm. Program of the useless eaters, who are generally considered to be, sick children, the elderly and the disabled. And I think that's, you know, exactly the same. That's exactly what's going on now. Speaker 26: Jean Wingate was taken to the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital with suspected pneumonia. Her daughter, Roseanne, says family were asked at that stage to sign a do not resuscitate order due to her mom's age and because she had COPD, but they refused. Speaker 19: Consultant called and said not to be overly concerned because if it was COVID, There was an 80% chance that my mother would be okay. So why are they so insistent that I should sign a DNR for for my mother who is 76, who was healthy. She left on her own. She was able to look after herself. Speaker 26: Jean was later diagnosed with COVID. Again, the family refused to sign a DNR, But Rosanne says doctors also told her if her mother's breathing got any worse, she wouldn't be given a ventilator. Sadly, Jean passed away just 2 days after being admitted, the family say they need answers. Speaker 19: I'm not sure if they worked on that. I don't know if they had put a DNR in place because they told me Speaker 9: So they should Speaker 10: be I really don't understand that. Because it seems sometimes when they need money, like for this COVID campaign that's been going on for over a year now, They can just click their fingers and and and and suddenly, money's coming out of their ears. Absolutely. But they can't afford money to pay people people's pensions. So then you realize it's not really about the money. No. It's about getting rid of well, getting the population down, but you can't say the depopulation word because I mean, you know, it's not it's not looking for that. You know? Speaker 9: Yeah. It's not a very good, it's not very good PR to Speaker 10: use that. Talk about No. But even though they've blatantly talked about it for decades Mhmm. And and all the people, you know, the powers that be at the moment, I will know NewGenesis. Boris name eugenicists. Isn't, Dominic Cummings' father as well eugenicist? Speaker 9: Yeah. He wrote it. Speaker 10: Johnny Johnson, obviously. The the it's all in plain sight. Corporation now? And, of course, Bill Gates, The lovely Bill Gates, who's been talking about it for decades as well and doing his best to to implement it. So they don't hide it. They're just laughing and carrying on. Absolutely. I think they believe that they're Untouchable, you know. Speaker 9: With regards to the DNRs, so there should at least be a conversation with family, Those that have power of attorney, or loved ones. And, again, does it appear in the panic generated, by the government's response to COVID, the fear and the panic, this is this has not even taken place. So, consultants and doctors are just Slapping on the DNR. There's no consultation taking place. I mean, that in itself, that one detail is an absolute Scandal that should Speaker 10: be On my dad's yeah. On my dad's DNR form, there's a there's a space that says, have you have you discussed this next kid. There's there's just a gap. They they they didn't even tick. No. There's just nothing in that back up. Speaker 27: How best to care for you, and particularly, I'm also hearing that you don't want, life prolonging measures As you get close to dying, that as long as you're comfortable so you want comfort care when that time comes. Speaker 8: Precisely. Speaker 10: And the big problem is what as well with, all this stuff going on, all these terrible protocols being put into place, it's just so convenient and Not at all a coincidence that it's all happening in a time where no no visitors are allowed in the hospital. There's no one there to advocate for these poor people who who aren't able to fight them off. You know? Speaker 25: I don't think that people could should have been banned from homes in the first place. Most care homes I've been in 100 of care homes. Most care homes have an office near the front of the home. That that could have been turned to a visiting area so that nobody was going further into the home. And people could have seen their loved ones in that setting. And it could have been organized better and they could have allowed visiting. And with visiting comes scrutiny, and the best people to stand up for those people inside those care homes are their loved ones. And that is part of what the problem is. There's no scrutiny. There's no questions being asked. Nobody knows what's going on, And there's been an abuse of power. Speaker 15: You've made it very clear repeatedly that top of your priority list are care home residents. Speaker 10: My first step was to tell the papers about this, huge story that I had. And the next morning, I I thought I would be overwhelmed and with with replies, you know, emails, And I didn't have anything. I think the day after that, I had an email from One Edge just saying he was away for the week. Then I had another email from someone saying they'd pass it on to someone else, and that was it. And then Then it went quiet again. So I thought, well, that's really strange because some of these editors are people I deal with quite regularly. And for them To just blank me completely was quite unusual. So, normally, I'd get a no thanks Or, you know, we run something similar recently or, you know, just the general sort of stock. Speaker 22: After midazolam is administered, you could duration of action between 15 to 30 minutes, after which post intubation sedation should be started. Conveniently, bedazolam could also be administered as continuous infusion for sedation as well.
Saved - January 24, 2024 at 5:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A support group member shared a photo of her mother in the hospital. Her mother was falsely diagnosed with Covid, taken off essential meds, and put on the 'Covid Death Pathway'. The daughter noticed serious bruising on her mother's neck and right side. Sadly, the elderly woman was euthanized with Midazolam, morphine, and nil by mouth, following the guideline. Rest in peace.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

The newest member of my support group shared this photo of her mother parked in the foyer of the hospital where she’d been admitted in 2021 with low blood pressure. Once there, she was falsely diagnosed with Covid, taken off all essential meds and put on the ‘Covid Death Pathway’ - originally #NG163 later renamed NG191. Her daughter observed serious bruising, starting at her mum’s neck and all down her right side. No one could tell her what had caused this. This kind, funny elderly woman was euthanised with Midazolam, morphine and nil by mouth - just as the killer guideline directs - shortly after this photo was taken. May she rest in peace.

Saved - February 8, 2024 at 10:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
My dad's DNR had no signature or boxes ticked. I informed his GP in June 2021 that there should be no DNR, and she confirmed there wasn't one. However, on the day he died, a paramedic believed my dad had a DNR and made a "best interests" decision. After a dose of an unfamiliar drug, my dad, who was not ill or receiving palliative care, died in a terrifying and undignified manner.

@JacquiDeevoy1 - Jacqui Deevoy

I still have a copy of my dad’s DNR. There’s no signature and no boxes ticked. In June 2021, I emailed my dad’s GP to tell her that under no circumstances should there be a DNR on him. The GP assured me that there wasn’t one in place. The day he died, while I was driving to be with him, one of the paramedics asked a step-relative who’d turned up whether my dad had a DNR in place. The step-relative said yes. According to my dad’s carer, the paramedic seemed pleased and proceeded to make a ‘best interests’ decision. It would appear that he believed that it was in my dad’s best interests to be dead. Half an hour later, after a hefty dose of a drug my dad had never had before, my dad (who had no known illness and who wasn’t at the end of his life or having palliative care), aged 78, died a most terrifying and undignified death.

@biologyphenom - Dave

🆕Scottish COVID inquiry|23 Nov 2023 🚨🚨Gillian discovered AFTER her grans death there was a DNR in place. A concerned Lord Brailsford-'was it signed?' 'it was in block capitals..with my name...it is NOT my signature at all' Full statement-https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf https://t.co/AWf6qfg0pl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that they discovered a do not resuscitate (DNR) order in their grandmother's file after her death. They had heard rumors about it but had never seen it until they provided a statement to the inquiry team. The speaker's name was on the DNR order, but it was not their signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR notice with the speaker, but the speaker had explicitly stated that they did not want to authorize it. The DNR order was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of it was left blank.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you subsequently ascertain that there was a do not resuscitate notice in relation to your grant. Speaker 1: That's great. Speaker 0: Can you just explain how you you came by that information? Speaker 1: We had heard that there was a possibility that there was a do not resuscitate order. After my grandmother had died, we'd heard From the solicitors that there was talk that there was a do not resuscitate order in my grant's file, but nobody had ever seen it. And so we didn't know the full facts of it. But when I actually sat with the inquiry team to give this statement, my solicitor produced the do not resuscitate order, and it had my name on it, And it was dated on the 2nd November. And it sorry, I've got a copy of it, but it's Can you block capital letters with my name? Speaker 0: So in other words, not your normal signature? Speaker 1: Not my signature at all. Speaker 0: Was the possibility of a DNR notice ever discussed with you by the care home? Speaker 1: Yes, it was. Speaker 0: And could The Care Home have understood from the discussion that they had with you that you might be authorizing a DNR notice for your grandmother? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My exact words Then we're categorically, I do not want to put a do not resuscitate order in place. Speaker 0: You tell us in the in paragraph 65, which to the lengthy paragraph about this, that the DNR is incomplete. How is it incomplete beyond the point that you've just clarified with his lordship about your signature? Speaker 1: There's a section in it that, asks if the patient is aware of the do not resuscitate order Being in place, and there's a box to tick yes or no, and neither box is ticked.
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 8:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In England, there were significant excess deaths among the elderly in April 2020, with a correlation to increased doses of Midazolam. These deaths were not solely due to COVID-19. Age-standardized mortality rates doubled in April 2020 and there was another spike over Christmas/New Year 2020/21. The use of Midazolam was widespread, particularly in care homes, suggesting a systemic policy of euthanasia. The anomaly of excess deaths in April 2020 indicates the harms of lockdown measures. There is evidence of discussions about "A Good Death" involving equipment, medication, and staff administration. Similar patterns were observed in Scotland. The elderly were put on end-of-life care with Midazolam and morphine, raising questions about the existence of a deadly disease. The actual IFR of deaths attributed to COVID is 0.1%, suggesting that something other than COVID-19 protocols was causing the deaths.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly Midazolam doses V Monthly Deaths (Age 75+) England 2019-2021 🚨 32,000 #ExcessDeaths in April 2020 +112% above 5-year average 🚨 Midazolam doses up +131% in April 2020 Our elderly weren’t dying from COVID- they were systemically assaulted with End-Of-Life protocols 1/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly Midazolam doses V Excess Deaths (Age 75+) England 2019-2021 🚨 55,000 #ExcessDeaths in 2020 +20% above 5-year average (Age 75+) 🚨 60,000 Excess doses of Midazolam given in 2020 These were not ‘COVID’ deaths NICE NG163 End-of-life protocol 2/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly Modazolam doses V Age-standardised mortality rates (Age 75+) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England 2019-2021 There is no hiding place here - age standardised rates are the gold standard - and they DOUBLED in April 2020 We also see a second correlation spike over Christmas/New Year 2020/21 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Excess Midazolam % Vs Excess Death % (Age 75+) England 2020-2021 April 2020 🟧 Midazolam +131.5% 🟦 Excess Deaths +112.8% January 2021 🟧 Midazolam +57.5% 🟦 Excess Deaths +27.7% How to create the illusion of a pandemic …. 4/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Source no.1 NHS OpenPrescribing #Midazolam usage, past 5 years 5/ https://openprescribing.net/chemical/1501041T0/

Page not found | OpenPrescribing openprescribing.net

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Source no.2 ONS Monthly mortality analysis 6/ https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/monthlymortalityanalysisenglandandwales

Monthly mortality analysis, England and Wales - Office for National Statistics Provisional data on death registrations and death occurrences in England and Wales, broken down by sex and age. Includes deaths due to coronavirus (COVID-19) and leading causes of death. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Credit to Dr Wilson Sy for posting his paper: ‘Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic’ I wanted to focus on the most vulnerable age group- the elderly- to take a deeper look at the correlation with excess 7 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemic

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

“The UK COVID-19 pandemic was iatrogenic, created with widespread and persistent use of Midazolam injections in all regions of England, particularly in care homes, under a systemic policy of euthanasia” 🟩 Monthly Midazolam use 🟥 COVID Deaths 8/ https://t.co/RD3gI7cQNK

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The anomaly of excess deaths in April 2020 is clear evidence of Lockdown harms ‘COVID’ cases were low at this time yet this was our highest month of death during the pandemic These were deaths caused by the COVID-treatment & response protocols Why else did deaths just stop? 9 https://t.co/1eDOemv2TY

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

17 April 2020 Health Secretary Matt Hancock & Dr Luke Evans MP, openly discuss what is needed for: A Good Death Telling us in plain sight You are still on the list, Matty 10/ #Midazolam

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

A Good Death needs three things: 🚨 Equipment 🚨 Medication & 🚨 The staff to administer it Dr Luke Evans MP Matt Hancock MP & Health Secretary 17th April 2020 https://t.co/vIA5zgLIvb

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have enough equipment and medication in the NHS to ensure a comfortable death. The supply chains for medications like midazolam and morphine are closely monitored to prevent shortages. Prescribing morphine per patient is being reviewed to reduce wastage. The clinical team is constantly discussing ways to optimize the supply of key medicines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With that, I mean, a a a good death needs 3 things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs, the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away? Speaker 1: Yes. We do. There was a challenge raised about this, about 8 days ago, and we resolved actually, it wasn't so as bigger challenges as was made public, and we've we've resolved that. So, yes, right now, we do. Speaker 0: And the second one is with that, but that's the the syringe drug drugs deliver medication, particularly things like midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered? Speaker 1: Yes. And we've got a big project to make sure that, those sorts of medications as well as the ITU medications that I spoke about earlier, the the supply chains global supply chains for those medicines are are clear. They are in fact, though those medicines are made in a relatively small number of factories around the world. So it is a delicate supply chain, and we are in, contact with the whole supply chain. Speaker 0: And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused, so I have to prescribe it for mister Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a health care home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine. Have you considered the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and health care professionals so that there isn't waste? Speaker 1: That's something that we keep under review. I've looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of key medicines, and it's something that the supply chain the supply team, sorry, in, in the department and, the clinical team, talk about all the time. I don't know if that's JV T's part of the clinical team, and he may want to say more. Speaker 0: Thank you. I've I've nothing really nothing really to add on that. Okay. Okay.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Scotland 2020/2021 🟪 Excess deaths in care homes 📊 Midazolam usage 3,000 excess deaths during lockdown - blamed on ‘COVID’ After lockdown ‘COVID’ disappeared for the summer - returning after the FLU vaccine roll out in September 2020 https://t.co/OU1yK3Xi4U

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Altogether now …. https://t.co/Cw1eIS8koi

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

https://t.co/JkGwRBsXY9

@biologyphenom - Dave

🆕Neil Oliver|15 Feb 2024 💣💣Truth bombs -'We know now the elderly were put on end of life care in hospitals and in care homes... -'They were dosed up with midazolam and morphine and hustled to the exit' -'What if there was no deadly disease at all?' 👍Thanks @thecoastguy https://t.co/x3tF8ze7RS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the true cause of the high death toll during the pandemic, suggesting it may not have been due to a deadly disease but rather the measures put in place. They ponder if COVID-19 was just a rebranding of existing illnesses to instill fear and control. The speaker raises concerns about loss of freedom, censorship, and demonization of non-compliant individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think about how we know now that the elderly were put on end of life care. In hospitals and in care homes, they were dosed up with midazolam and morphine and hustled to the exit of life and how those fatalities, those large numbers of the elderly all dead at once made the death tolls for SARS CoV 2 so apparently frightening. And I think about the experimental gene therapies that were all but mandated for billions of people around the world. I think about all of it and I wonder, what if, what if there was no deadly disease at all? What if there was no disease to fear? No danger? And people died. Before anybody, you know, reminds me in the comments or whatever, people died. I know that. But people die in their tens of thousands every year from outbreaks of seasonal viral illness, Flu. What have you. What if COVID was actually nothing new? Just more of the usual rebranded as something new? Given a scary new name? What if? What if all we got were not the consequences of a deadly disease but the effects of the measures that were put in place because of the so called pandemic. What if? What if there was no pandemic at all? Just a fiction that enabled people with an agenda to take control of the world, to erase freedom, to censor inconvenient truth, to demonize an awkward minority of people that wouldn't comply, People who had questions they wanted answered.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For those 32,000 excess deaths in April to have been ‘COVID’ deaths the IFR needed to be 25% The actual IFR of deaths attributed to COVID is now known to be 0.1% Something else was killing those old folks Was it the COVID-protocols rather than ‘COVID’ Read NG163 https://t.co/Vt22UlwT6l

Saved - February 23, 2024 at 2:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dozens of children were left motherless due to the cervical check scandal. The Chief Medical Officer at the time, Dr. Tony Holohan, advised against disclosing the missed cancer diagnoses to the affected women. Many believe that mistakes were made, leading to late diagnoses and certain death. Dr. Holohan now earns €257,000 as a Cancer consultant. Additionally, he faced criticism for his handling of lockdown measures during the non-pandemic, causing harm to children's education and mental health. The lockdowns also had negative effects on working-class individuals and resulted in increased domestic violence. Many elderly people died alone in nursing homes. The CSO admitted that only 149 people died solely from the virus, raising questions about the necessity of the public health measures. The Irish people demand accountability from Dr. Holohan.

@IrishInquiry - TheIrishInquiry

Can we take a moment to remember how dozens of young children have been left motherless and traumatised with grief because of the cervical check scandal. As Chief Medical Officer at that time, @DrTonyHolohan advised the then Minister for Health @SimonHarrisTD to not disclose to the women affected that their cancer diagnosis was missed by the American laboratory that was outsourced by #CervicalCheck. Many of those women would still be here today if mistakes were not made. A late diagnosis meant certain death in many cases. Dr. Death (as he became known during the bad cold non pandemic) wanted to save the State the trouble of dealing with law suits. Yes, that's right. He was happy for young children to be denied compensation that was due to their terminally ill mothers. Now he will "earn" €257,000 a year as a Cancer consultant. What a joke. And let's not even start on how this man treated the Irish Public during the non pandemic, pushing seemingly endless lockdown measures and strict public "safety" measures that were not based on scientific evidence. When challenged, he said to @mattiemcgrathtd that they would implement the lockdowns first and worry about the science later. He caused untold damage to children all over the country who were denied an education and normal interactions with friends. Younger children who learn empathy and language through mirroring and mimicking facial expressions were unable to see human faces for a lengthy and sustained period (other than that of their immediate family). More people were harmed and died through the lockdowns and subsequent dangerous prophylactic than were ever harmed from the cold. The harm ranged from physical to psychological and permeated every level of society, but in particular affected working class people with lower incomes. Domestic violence reached unprecedented levels, and many other devastating outcomes resulted from his strategy. Many elderly people spent their final months and years alone. Some who had dementia and other prion diseases spent those days in total confusion, not understanding why they were abandoned and why everyone wore masks. Thousands were sent from hospitals into nursing homes (labelled bed blockers) where they received no treatment and were instead pumped full of drugs like Midazolam until they succumbed to a lonely death. Latex gloves were filled with warm water and placed in their hands, in place of a real hand to hold. Following the lockdowns it became clear there was no pandemic. The CSO admitted to The Irish Inquiry that a total pf 149 people died solely of the virus between 2020 and the end of 2021. There was no overall increase in national mortality during the time when we all were forced into complying with public "health" measures. #TonyHolohan must be held to account by the Irish people.

Saved - March 6, 2024 at 6:03 PM

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland

SICK!!! Disabled people were secretly given Do Not Resuscitate orders, Scottish Covid-19 inquiry hears https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12781471/Disabled-people-secretly-given-Not-Resuscitate-orders-Scottish-Covid-19-inquiry-hears.html

Disabled people were secretly given Do Not Resuscitate orders Disabled Scots felt like their lives were 'not worth saving' during the pandemic after Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were secretly imposed on many of them dailymail.co.uk
Saved - March 29, 2024 at 5:14 PM

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland

MAKE THIS VIRAL The Moment Witnesses Broke Their Silence on Scotland's End-Of-Life Care Protocols During Covid: What Really Happened... "Regardless of what the residents symptoms were, they were prescribed just in case medication (midazolam and morphine). We really struggled." via https://www.youtube.com/live/owk3_fQjlJw?si=0qwlwAZ5VO6HxQhm https://gettr.com/post/p32tpi172bf

Video Not Available youtube.com
The Stark Naked Brief. on GETTR : The Moment Witnesses Broke Their Silence on Scotland's End-Of-Life Care Protocols During Covid: What Really Happened... Regardless of what the residents symptoms were, they were prescribed just in case medication (midazolam and morphine). We really struggled. via https://www.youtube.com/live/owk3_fQjlJw?si=0qwlwAZ5VO6HxQhm The Moment Witnesses Broke Their Silence on Scotland's End-Of-Life Care Protocols During Covid: What Really Happened... Regardless of what the residents symptoms were, they were prescribed just in case medication (midazolam and morphine). We really struggled. via https://www.youtube.com/live/owk3_fQjlJw?si=0qwlwAZ5VO6HxQhm gettr.com
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 4:41 PM

@MISSXBUTTERFLYX - missbutterfly 🌸

The truth is coming of Nhs murder/manslaughter ‼️‼️ #Midazolam Were Covid patients left to die against their wishes? Care homes under pressure to issue Do Not Res… https://mol.im/a/13277723 via https://dailym.ai/android

Were Covid patients left to die against their wishes? Gillan Grant (pictured right) put her name on a document that effectively denied her grandmother (left) potentially lifesaving treatment. dailymail.co.uk
Home | Daily Mail Online MailOnline - get the latest breaking news, celebrity photos, viral videos, science & tech news, and top stories from MailOnline and the Daily Mail newspaper. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 11:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There was a shocking discovery of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for the author's grandmother, with the author's name on it without their authorization. Blanket DNR orders were placed on care home residents, preventing hospital admissions and ambulance callouts. End-of-Life drugs were prescribed over the phone. The author questions the lack of a police investigation into the unlawful deaths of care home residents during the pandemic.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

‘There was a still more shocking sight to come. It was a piece of paper known as a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for her grandmother – and Ms Grant's name was on it as the next of kin authorising it She had never authorise such a thing’ https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13277723/Were-Covid-patients-left-die-against-wishes.html

Were Covid patients left to die against their wishes? Gillan Grant (pictured right) put her name on a document that effectively denied her grandmother (left) potentially lifesaving treatment. dailymail.co.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Credit to @BrokerJonathan for writing this very important piece Jonathan, if you are needing any more information on this please feel free to extract anything from my posts Or the threads by @biologyphenom

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎙Scottish COVID-inquiry, Care Home managers confirm; 🚨Blanket ‘Do not attempt CPR’ notices were placed on their residents by GPs/NHS 🚨 No hospital admissions and no ambulances would attend Care Home residents with a DNR order Impact Hearing Day 31 26/3/2024 Part 1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Summary: Updating anticipatory care plans during the pandemic was challenging due to families wanting hospital treatment for their loved ones, but facing restrictions. There was a push by the NHS to implement DNA CPR in care homes, causing access to care to be limited without much public discussion. Translation: During the pandemic, updating care plans and implementing DNA CPR in care homes faced challenges and restrictions, impacting access to care without widespread public awareness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to move on to anticipatory care plans and DNA CPR. With regard to putting in place anticipatory care plans, I understand you had to contact patients contact families and also have discussions with residents. What is the reaction of families on being contacted about that matter? Speaker 1: I think we've always had anticipated a care plan, so getting in touch to update those, you know, on the back of the GPs asking to kind of just as lockdown came into play wasn't something that was out of the ordinary. The difficulty you then had was if the family member had said, well, if my loved one becomes unwell, not specifically COVID related, just with anything and hospital treatments required, then, yeah, I would still like them to go. That was then the challenge because you weren't able to put them anywhere because nobody would take them. So trying to have that conversation was really difficult, and it wasn't one that I personally would then put the families back to the JPs because that's not on me. That was my call, not to escalate that. But people were still wanting their care escalated, but were being told by medical professionals that they couldn't get it. Speaker 2: D and ACPR is a normal part of care home life, I guess. There's always a discussion with people about whether which route they would like to go. But I guess there was an impression that there was I'm not sure that's the right phrase, but a push on by the NHS to get more of these things in place. In one of our homes, we received D and A ACPRs for all of our residents that hadn't already got one in place, and we had a bit of a discussion back and forward, and we actually sent them back to the NHS. There was a restriction in terms of access to care for people in care homes. I think that was a decision that must have been made by the NHS, but that doesn't appear that wasn't a discussion that was held in the sort of full public light. It seemed to be a decision that was made very low key, not very well publicized, but was a reality of the first couple of years of the pandemic anyway.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@BrokerJonathan @biologyphenom

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@AamerAnwar Revelation of method: 🚨 5,000 elderly patients discharged from hospital into care homes 🚨 blanket DNR orders placed on residents 🚨 no ambulance or GP call outs where resident had a DNR order 🚨 GPs prescribed End-of-Life drugs over the phone to care home residents

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@BrokerJonathan @biologyphenom

@covidinquirysco - Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry

Day 15 of the Inquiry's Health and Social Care Impact Hearings begins today at 10 am. A Restriction Order has been placed relating to one of today's witnesses. More information and broadcast streams are available on the Inquiry's website: https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearing/impact-hearing-health-social-care-day-15

Impact Hearing | Health and Social Care | Day 15 | Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry Day 15 of the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry's Health and Social Care Impact Hearings.Date: 23 November 2023Time: 10am covid19inquiry.scot

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@BrokerJonathan @biologyphenom Clip of Gillian Grant extracted from the Scottish Covid Inquiry;

@biologyphenom - Dave-independent researcher

🆕Scottish COVID inquiry|23 Nov 2023 🚨🚨Gillian discovered AFTER her grans death there was a DNR in place. A concerned Lord Brailsford-'was it signed?' 'it was in block capitals..with my name...it is NOT my signature at all' Full statement-https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf https://t.co/AWf6qfg0pl

Video Transcript AI Summary
I found out there was a do not resuscitate order for my grandmother after she passed away. The order had my name on it, but it wasn't my signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR with me, but I had clearly stated I did not want one. The DNR form was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of the order was left blank.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you subsequently ascertain that there was a do not resuscitate notice in relation to your grant. Speaker 1: That's great. Speaker 0: Can you just explain how you you came by that information? Speaker 1: We had heard that there was a possibility that there was a donor resuscitate order. After my grandmother had died, we'd heard from the solicitors that there was talk that there was a do not resuscitate order in my grant's file, but nobody had ever seen it, and so we didn't know the full facts of it. But when I actually sat with the inquiry team to give this statement, my solicitor produced the do not resuscitate order, and it had my name on it, and it was dated on the 2nd November. And it sorry? I've got a copy of it, but, it's kind of block capital letters with my name. Speaker 0: So in other words, not your normal signature? Speaker 1: Not my signature at all. Speaker 0: Was the possibility of a DNR notice ever discussed with you by the care home? Speaker 1: Yes, it was. Speaker 0: And could the care home have understood from the discussion that they had with you that you might be authorizing a DNR notice for your grandmother? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My exact words then were categorically, I do not want to put a do not resuscitate order in place. Speaker 0: You tell us in the in paragraph 65, which is a lengthy paragraph about this, that the DNR is incomplete. Yes. How is it incomplete beyond the point that you've just clarified with the lordship about about your signature? Speaker 1: There's a section in it that, asks if the if the patient is aware of the do not resuscitate order being in place, and there's a box to tick yes or no, and neither box is ticked.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The evidence is all there In plan sight Where is the Police investigation into the unlawful deaths of thousands of Care Home residents during the ‘pandemic’ ? https://t.co/VgvyiBoa6e

Saved - May 21, 2024 at 1:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A widow shares her husband's experience with Covid-19, stating he seemed to be improving before being given Midazolam and subsequently passing away. A nurse with 45 years of experience expresses surprise at the use of Midazolam for sleep. The inquiry questions the use of Midazolam in care settings during the pandemic, while also focusing on unrelated gossip.

@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen MP

“He FaceTimed me. He looked really well. He was up and dressed… he was laughing and joking.” Widow Lianne Menzies tells the Scottish Covid Inquiry how her 38 year old husband Jamie was getting better, was given Midazolam “to help him sleep”, then died. Experienced nurse John Campbell: “I’ve never, ever in forty five years of nursing given Midazolam to help someone sleep.” What on earth went on in care settings with Midazolam during the pandemic? The English Covid Inquiry, meanwhile, is fearlessly grilling Sue Gray about Westminster gossip. Shameful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHBpD7cuNB4&t=131s

Saved - November 25, 2024 at 7:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the Northern Ireland Parliament, focusing on the vaccine-injured and bereaved. I believe the materials called vaccines were intentionally designed to harm recipients. With my background in pharmaceutical research, I argue that the COVID pandemic was fabricated, leading to harmful medical practices and unnecessary deaths. The so-called vaccines were rushed and toxic, created to injure and reduce fertility. I urge everyone to stop trusting those who lied to us and to speak out against ongoing threats to our freedoms and health.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨Dr Mike Yeadon's Address to Northern Ireland Parliament ----------------------------------- Hello, my name is Dr. Mike Yeadon, and in the next 15 minutes or so, I would like to address those of you who've been vaccine injured or bereaved, and also those of you who are involved in the political process in Northern Ireland, as well as anywhere else in the world who might hear me. At the end of this process, I hope you will believe what I'm going to tell you, which, shockingly, is that the materials masquerading as vaccines were designed intentionally to harm the people who received them. I'm probably the most qualified former pharmaceutical company research executive in the world speaking out on this matter, and since I spent my entire career in the business of working with teams designing molecules to be new potential medicines, I think I am qualified to comment on it, and that is my shocking judgement that has been only reinforced over the last almost four years since I first said it. I'll also have some suggestions for what we can do together to fight against the global crime which is ongoing. So, just a little bit about me so you can decide whether or not to believe me. So, I'm a career-long research scientist. I've worked all of my life in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree included a training in toxicology, so that's an understanding of how materials can injure human beings at a molecular level, and what the relationship is between the structure of them and the toxicity. In my second degree, a PhD, I did research in respiratory pharmacology, control of breathing and control of respiratory reflexes. So, and then after that, I joined the pharmaceutical industry in 1988, and I worked until very recently on new medicines for allergic and respiratory diseases. In my corporate career, I was for a long time responsible at Pfizer, then the biggest research-based drug company in the world, for everything to do with allergic and respiratory diseases in the research field. So, that was my responsibility. And in the last 10 years, after leaving in 2011, I was an independent and I became the founder and CEO of a biotech company, which was eventually acquired by Novartis, which was then the biggest drug company in the world. So, I have had a good career, and I was well regarded in the industry for my scientific acumen and judgments, until, of course, I started speaking out against the nonsense, the COVID pandemic, and especially the so-called vaccines. I've become persona non grata. It was my former colleagues after that. So, I'm well qualified to comment on the toxicological principles, properties of molecules, and the kind of effects you might see from certain structures. So, just very briefly, before I talk about the so-called vaccines, what happened in 2020? It's taken me a long time to get there, and I haven't made everybody happy with the decision I've reached, but there was not a pandemic or a public health emergency. I don't think there was anything at all, apart from lies, propaganda, fear-based information, fake diagnostic tests called PCR, and then, as it were, misattribution of real illnesses that people did have, which were called COVID when there was no such thing. But what happened, shockingly, was that after the World Health Organisation's chairman called a pandemic, which was not true. There's never been a pandemic. There won't be pandemics. They're immunologically impossible. But after he called them, many countries in the world changed radically their medical management practises for people in hospitals, also in care homes, and in the community. And very briefly, in hospitals, many people were sedated, had a plastic tube put down their airway, and unconscious, put on mechanical ventilators. I can assure you that is not ever an appropriate treatment for someone with an influenza-like illness, whatever you might think COVID was. But that would not be something you would do, and if applied to frail and elderly people, they will die in large numbers, which they did. So that was the first crime. It's not a mistake. There are no mistakes here. Mistakes were not made. They were told to do this by figures at supranational level. We don't know exactly who, but we know this because these mad procedures changed in many countries all at the same time. So that's hospitals, in care homes, assisted living, old-age people's homes, and so on. Many people were given drugs like Midazolam, which is an injectable form of a drug like Valium, a sedative. But they were also given injections of pain-relieving drugs like morphine, even if they weren't in pain. My PhD was in the field of understanding what opiate drugs like morphine do to the respiratory reflux, and I can assure you it suppresses and suppresses it and depresses it. So if you give an elderly person on their own an injection of Midazolam, they will become sedated and sleepy, and if you give them an injection of morphine, their breathing will slow. I can tell you, it's absolutely forbidden to give a person those two drugs together, those two drug classes together, unless they are under intense ongoing medical monitoring. And the reason is they're likely to fall asleep and stop breathing. That, of course, is what happened. So that's hospitals and care homes. Your relatives were killed by the medical procedures that were imposed. Now, it's quite possible early on that not everybody involved knew what was happening, but I'm afraid after a few days, you'd have to be a blockhead not to realise that it was what you were doing to your charges, your patients, that was resulting in their deaths. So I've completely lost any trust in the medical profession because virtually no one has spoken up four and a half years later. This happens to lots of people. If you listen to the recordings, heartbreaking recordings given to the Scottish COVID Enquiry, I think that's probably the only place where there's been an official taking of evidence from people. And what I just described is exactly what happens to lots of people's relatives and no doubt happens to some people in Northern Ireland as well. It certainly happens in England. There were worse things as well. People in the community were deprived of medical care that would have saved their lives. And there's plenty of evidence to say that not being given antibiotics when they had incipient bronchial pneumonia also killed thousands, possibly tens of thousands of people. And there, ladies and gentlemen, was your pandemic. All of those deaths were attributed to COVID and you were told this is this terrible pandemic, you need to lock down, wear masks, do what you're told. Nothing was happening at all apart from medical murder and propaganda from the television and the newspaper, politicians and many public, well-known public figures who are doing what they were told. So of course one conclusion I'm going to come to later is stop listening to liars. The people who've lied to you shouldn't listen to them ever again. Stop listening to them today. But for me, I think the worst thing, because it comes out of my industry and because it's so deliberate, it requires such a lot of forethought, are the so-called vaccines. Now we were told there was this new infectious disease, so far so good ladies and gentlemen, but then they said don't worry we'll rustle up a vaccine and they did so at least in about 10 months, something like that. I can tell you after spending a career in this industry, you can no more make a baby in one month with nine women than you can make a complicated biological product in 10 months. It cannot be done. It was not done. They did something else. They created materials which were essentially injected poisons. They were not vaccines. There was never anything to vaccinate against. And when you've listened to what I've just told you, you know that must be true because you can't do something in 10 months that normally takes 6 to 12 years. Medicines are not put together randomly. They are built. And they're built by people who are discussing with colleagues, work out what kind of materials, what kind of structures, what kind of formulations, what kind of doses you would need to add in order to hit a particular molecular target to have a chance of a particular therapeutic goal being reached without unacceptable side effects. That's called rational design. And that is my whole career, ladies and gentlemen, from my undergraduate days to today. So when I look at the design of the medicine, whatever kind it is, and look at the design on paper and its composition structures and so on, it is as if I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer, someone like me, someone with my qualifications designed these things. So when I look at them, I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer and I can discern something of what their objectives were, what were they trying to do? And I came quickly to the conclusion that they wanted to bring about toxicity that would injure, kill and reduce fertility. There aren't any other alternatives. And remember, there was no public health emergency. So I'll just give you three examples. I'm not going to be too scientific, but three things so you can check them. The objective of these so-called gene-based vaccines was to inject you with a genetic sequence for something called spike protein. Now, it doesn't really matter what spike protein is, if it's real, where it came from. The point is, it's a genetic sequence for a protein that doesn't belong in your body. It's non-self, it's foreign. Your immune system is a wonderful work of God and nature. It distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you and are fine from anything else, foreign, non-self. If you inject a person with a genetic sequence that instructs your body to become a factory for some protein that doesn't belong in you, your immune system will detect that and it will attack every cell that's done that instruction and kill it. Now, these materials, when injected in your arm, didn't stay in your arm, they travelled around your heart, your lungs, your kidneys, your brain, your ovaries. And in every place it landed, if it was taken up and expressed, your body registered that as foreign invasion and it attacks and kills every cell doing it. There is no other possible consequence from doing that. So that's step one and no one can argue that's not what they did. That is the design of them. It also picks a particular protein. I'm not really sure where spike protein came from, if it's really real, but proteins like the one they claim was encoded in these gene-based materials are known to be toxic. There are loads of experiments, lots of published experiments, showing that proteins like that one cause blood coagulation, damaged nerves, damaged heart tissue. So they injected you with something that would make your body make a protein that doesn't belong there, knowing axiomatically, automatically, unavoidably, your immune system would attack that. It would be like rejecting an organ transplant. Your body would say, that's foreign, got to go, uses your immune system to kill it. And then they also inject you with something that's inherently toxic. So if it got out into your body or wherever it was made, it would harm you. And I've got a third one that cannot be argued with. At least the mRNA products from Pfizer and Moderna were encapsulated in something called lipid nanoparticles. It's really a blob of fat, complicated, technical blob of fat, that's what it is after all. And what that material did is allowed your injection to glide all around your body across all biological barriers and get everywhere in your body. So of course, it's not what you would want, is it? For something that they told you was inhaled into your nose and lungs. But no, it went all around your body, into your brain, blood vessels. But in particular, I need to tell you, there were publications that are now more than 10 years old in peer-reviewed journal articles. I'm sceptical about whether they're always very honest, but there were peer-reviewed journal articles showing that lipid nanoparticles were recognised over a decade ago of having a particular property, which you're not going to like to hear, which shocked me when I learned it. They tend to deposit their payload into the ovaries. That is exactly what happened with these injected materials. There was at least one study performed with the Pfizer agents, with the Japanese regulatory authorities. Lo and behold, the material accumulated in the ovaries of the test animals. That is what's happened, ladies and gentlemen, every woman and girl injected with these materials. Remember what I said about designing molecules to do things deliberately with objectives in mind? They picked lipid nanoparticles, knowing they accumulate the payload in ovaries. It's not an accident. Mistakes were not made. So I tell you, as a professional who spent his whole honest scientific career in an industry I did not realise was corrupt, trying to make experimental medicines for respiratory and allergy diseases, that my experience tells me that there are multiple independent, unnecessary and obvious mechanisms of toxicity built into these so-called vaccines. And then by sheer luck, all four companies, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Pfizer, all chose basically the same formula for their so-called vaccines. That would never happen if it was real. For a start, I would call my opposite numbers and say, we should do different things because if something goes wrong, if we're wrong in an assumption, all of the so-called vaccines will fail for the same reason. We should do different things. It's called diversification. But no, they all did the same things because they're just lying. They were making intentionally dangerous material, passing them off as vaccines to having you and your children. And that's what they did. Of course, I didn't get injected and neither did my children and most of my relatives. Some of them didn't believe me. I'm afraid they've been injected too. So big picture, what happens, I think from the research I've done, and of course, I'm an expert in research and development, not in politics, but I believe that very wealthy people, the kind of people who run foundations with names, have planned, as have their antecedents for a couple of generations, to take over the world, to remove the freedoms of ordinary people like us that they regard as useless eaters. They don't want us around anymore. And their intention is to strip us of our freedoms by persuading us that there are very frightening events occurring in the world, and we need them to lead us to safety. There are documents you can find from a group called the Club of Rome, who in the late 1960s were commissioned by some of these people who run the nameless global foundations that have hundreds of billions of pounds of worth. They were asked to come up with scenarios that would produce challenges for countries that couldn't be solved by countries on their own, so they would have to look outwards and upwards to supranational solutions. Now guess what? The two things they came up with, pandemics of infectious diseases, which I know as an immunologist are not possible and have never happened. The other thing they said to account for or plan for were climate change crises. I've done enough research now, ladies and gentlemen, I've spoken to people who have spent as long in climate atmospheric research as I have in pharmaceutical R&D, and they have explained to me, and I understand very well, that there's all of this nonsense about carbon dioxide, global boiling, net zero. It's all a complete scam from the same people who bought you the Covid scam and the dangerous injections. It's the same people. They want one world government, they want to be deprived of your liberty, and then I'm afraid I think they will kill us using these injections because they're going to do it again. All over the world, factories to make mRNA-based materials are being thrown up, billions of doses are being made, and if we let them they will sicken in our arms and people will sicken and die. So those of you who have been injured or bereaved, in my mind no blame whatsoever attaches to you. How could you know that people you trusted and thought you could trust were lying to you? Well, you didn't know, but if you let them inject you again, you have no sympathy for me because they have lied to you, you've been injured or killed, and I've explained to you that they're liars and they have attacked us. So if you go along with it, you cannot be saved. All we need to do is enough of us continue to speak out about this and say we're not having it anymore, get lost, don't listen to liars anymore. People who've lied to you forfeit their trust forever, in my view, and so anyone who's in the political process, for example in Northern Ireland looking at this so-called public health bill, which if you pass it would allow these supranational criminals to take you from your house, to inject you by force if necessary, they are aiding and abetting a global crime. And I saw someone online say recently that if you pass that legislation, I don't think it'd be unreasonable to interpret that as an act of war. It's as serious as that. So politicians, you may well be under pressure from shadowy figures, but if you go along with it and hope for like an easier time of it, you will have unlocked the doors of hell and pushed everybody in it and you as long with it as well. So this is your time to do what I'm doing, which is to speak out no matter the consequences. I say to you if you're frightened about what happens, if you speak out, you should be absolutely terrified about what's going to happen if you don't. So really that's all I've got to say. I do think these criminals are going to do it again, they're continuing to threaten us with pandemics like bird flu, monkey pox and so on. It is all nonsense. Stop listening to liars right now. Put things right between you, the people you love, and between you and God if you haven't already. And for goodness sake, be one of the people who speaks out no matter what the consequences, because if you don't, we'll lose our freedom and then our lives. Thank you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello, I’m Dr. Mike Geadon. I want to address those affected by vaccine injuries and those involved in politics. I believe the materials labeled as vaccines were intentionally designed to harm recipients. With a career in pharmaceutical research, I assert that the COVID-19 response was not a genuine pandemic but rather a series of deliberate actions leading to unnecessary deaths through harmful medical practices. The so-called vaccines were rushed and contain toxic components that can harm the body, including the ovaries. This was not an accident; it was a calculated decision. We must stop trusting those who have lied to us and resist any further harmful measures. Politicians must recognize the gravity of passing legislation that enables such actions. It’s crucial to speak out against these injustices to protect our freedoms and lives. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Mike Geadon. And in Speaker 1: the next 15 minutes or so, I would like to address those of Speaker 0: you who've been vaccine, injured, or bereaved, and also those of you who are involved in the political process in Northern Ireland as well as anywhere else in the world who might hear me. At the end of this process, I hope you will believe what I'm going to tell you, which shockingly is that the materials masquerading as vaccines were designed intentionally to harm the people who received them. I'm probably the most qualified former pharmaceutical company research executive in the world speaking out on this matter. And since I spent my entire career in the business of working with teams designing molecules to be new potential medicines, I think I am qualified to comment on it, and that is my shocking judgment that has been only reinforced over the last, almost 4 years since I first said it. I'll also have some suggestions for what we can do together to, fight against Speaker 1: the global crime, which is ongoing. So just a little bit about me so you can decide whether or not to believe me. Speaker 0: So I'm a career long research scientist. I've worked all of my life in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree included a training in toxicology. So it's an understanding of how materials can injure human beings at a molecular level and what the relationship is between the structure of them and and the toxicity. In my second degree of PhD, I did research in respiratory pharmacology, control of breathing and and control of respiratory reflexes. So, and then after that, I joined as a pharmaceutical industry in 1988, and I worked until very recently, Speaker 1: on new medicines for allergic and respiratory diseases. In my corporate career, I was, for Speaker 0: a long time, responsible at Pfizer, then the biggest research based drug company in the world for everything to do with allergic and respiratory, diseases in the research field. So that was my responsibility. And in the last 10 years after leaving in 2011, I was an independent, and I became the founder and CEO of a biotech company, which is eventually acquired by Novartis, which was then the biggest drug company in the world. So I have had a, Speaker 1: a good career, and Speaker 0: I was well regarded in the industry, for my scientific acumen and judgments, until, of course, I started speaking out against the nonsense, the COVID pandemic, and especially the so called vaccines. I've become persona non grata. It was my former colleagues after that. So I'm well qualified to comment on the, topological principles, properties of molecules, and, you know, the kind of effects you might see from from certain structures. Speaker 1: So just very briefly before I talk about the so called vaccines, what happened in 2020? Speaker 0: It's taken me a long time Speaker 1: to get there, and Speaker 0: I haven't made I've made, or not I've not made anybody happy with the decision I've reached, but there was not a pandemic or a public health emergency. I don't think there was anything at all apart from lies, propaganda, you know, fear based information, fake diagnostic test called PCR, and then as it were misattribution of real illnesses that people did have, which were called COVID when there was no such there was no such thing. But what happened, shockingly, was that after the World Health Organization's, chairman called a pandemic, which was not true. There's never been a pandemic. There won't be pandemics. They're immunologically impossible. But after he calls them, many countries in the world changed radically their medical management practices for people in hospitals, also in care homes and in the community. And very briefly, in hospitals, many people were sedated, had a plastic tube put down their airway and unconscious put on mechanical ventilators. I can assure you that is not ever an appropriate treatment for someone with a an influenza like illness, whatever you might think COVID was. But that would not be something you would do. And if given if applied to frail and elderly people, they will die in large numbers, which they did. So that was the first, crime. It's it's not a mistake. Speaker 1: There are no mistakes here. Mistakes were not made. They were told to do this by figures at supranational level. Speaker 0: We don't know exactly who. But we know this because these mad procedures changed in many countries all at the same time. So that's hospitals, in care homes, you know, assisted living, old age people's homes, and so on. Many people were given drugs like midazolam, which is an injectable form of a drug like Valium, a sedative. But they were also given injections or pain relieving drugs like morphine even if they weren't in pain. My PhD was in the field of understanding what opioid drugs like morphine due to the respiratory reflux. And I can assure you, it suppresses and suppresses and depresses it. So if you Speaker 1: give an elderly person on their own an injection of Midazolam, they will become sedated and sleepy. And if Speaker 0: you give them an injection of morphine, their breathing will slow. I can tell you it's absolutely forbidden to give a person those 2 drugs together, those 2 drug classes together unless they answer intense ongoing medical monitoring. And the reason is they're very likely to fall asleep and stop breathing. That, of course, is what happened. So that's hospitals and care homes. Your relatives were killed by the medical procedures that were imposed. Speaker 1: Now it's quite possible early on that not everybody involved knew what was happening, but I'm afraid after a few days, you have Speaker 0: to be a blockhead not to realize that it was what you were doing to your charges, your patients that were resulting in their deaths. So I've completely lost any trust in the medical profession because virtually no one has spoken up four and a half years later. This happens to lots of people. If you listen to the recordings, heartbreaking recording is given to the Scottish COVID inquiry. I think that's probably the only place where there's been an official taking of evidence from people. And what I just described is exactly what happened to lots of people's relatives. I know that happens to some people in Northern Ireland as well. It certainly happens in England. There were worse things as well. People in the community were deprived of medical care that would have saved their lives. And there's plenty of evidence to say that not being given antibiotics when they had incipient bronchial pneumonia also killed thousands, possibly tens of thousands of people. And there, ladies and gentlemen, was your pandemic. All of those deaths were attributed to COVID, and you were told this is a terrible pandemic. You need to lock down. Wear masks. Do what you're told. Nothing was happening at all apart from medical murder and propaganda from the television and the newspaper, politicians, and many public, well known public figures who are doing what they were told. So, of course, one conclusion events come to you later is stop listening to liars. The people who've lied to you shouldn't listen to them ever again. Stop listening to them today. But the for me, I think the worst thing because it comes out of my industry and because I it's so deliberate. It requires such Speaker 1: a loss of forethought of the so called vaccines. And we Speaker 0: were told there was this new infectious disease. So far, so good, ladies and gentlemen. But then they said, don't worry. We'll ruffle up a vaccine. And they did so at least in about 10 months, something like that. I can tell you after spending a career in this industry, you can no more make Speaker 1: a baby in 1 month with 9 women than you Speaker 0: can make a complicated biological product in 10 months. It cannot be done. It was not done. So it is something else. They created materials which were essentially injected poisons. They were not vaccines. There was never anything to vaccinate against. And when you've listened to what I've just told you, you know that must be true because you can't do something in 10 months that normally takes 6 to 12 years. Medicines are not put together randomly. They're they're built, and they're built by people who discussing with colleagues, work out what kind of materials, what kind of structures, what kind of formulations, what kind of doses you would need to add in order to hit a particular molecular target. So have a chance of a particular therapeutic goal being reached without unacceptable side effects. That's called rational design. And that is my whole career, ladies and gentlemen, from my undergraduate days to today. So when I look at the design of the medicine, whatever kind it is, and look at the design on paper and its composition, structures, and so on, it is as if I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer. Someone like me. Someone with my qualifications design these things. The one I look at them, I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer, and I can discern something of what their objectives were. What were they trying to do? Speaker 1: And I came quickly to the conclusion that they wanted to bring about toxicity that would injure, kill, and reduce fertility. There are no any other alternatives. And remember, there was no public health emergency. So I'll just Speaker 0: give you three examples. I'm not gonna be too scientific, but three things so you can check them. The objective of these so called gene based vaccines was to inject you with a genetic sequence for something called spike protein. Now it doesn't really matter what spike protein is, if it's real, where it came from. The point is it's a genetic sequence for a protein that doesn't belong in your body. It's non self. It's foreign. Your immune system is a wonderful work of God and nature. Speaker 1: It Speaker 0: distinguishes self, things that meant to be inside you and are fine from anything else, foreign non self. If you inject a person with a genetic sequence that instructs your body to become a factory for some protein that doesn't belong in you, your immune system will detect that, and it will attack every cell that's done that instruction and Speaker 1: kill it. Now these materials, when injected Speaker 0: in your arm, didn't stay in your arm. They traveled around your heart, your lungs, your kidneys, your brain, your ovaries. And in every place it landed, if it was taken up and expressed, your body registered that as foreign invasion, and it attacks and killed every cell doing it. There is no other possible consequence from doing that. So that's that's step 1, and no one can argue that's not what they did. That is the design of them. They also picked a particular protein. I'm not really sure where spike protein came came from if it's really real. But proteins like the one they claim was encoded in the gene based materials are known to be toxic. There are loads of experiments, lots of published experiments showing that proteins like that one caused blood triangulation, damaged nerves, damaged heart tissue. So they injected you with something that would make your body make protein that doesn't belong there knowing axiomatically, automatically, unavoidable, your immune system will attack that. It would be like rejecting an organ transplant. Your body would say that's foreign. Gotta go. Use your immune system to kill it. And then they also inject you with something that's inherently toxic. So if it got out into your body or wherever it was made, it would harm you. And I've got a third one that cannot be argued with. At least the mRNA products from Pfizer and Moderna were encapsulated in something called lipid nanoparticles. It's really a blob of fats, Complicated technical blob of fat. That's what it is after all. And what that materials did is allowed your injection to glide all around your body across all biological barriers and get everywhere in your body. Because it's not what you would want, is it, for something that they told you was inhaled into your nose and lungs. But, no, it went all around your body into your brain, blood vessels. But in particular, I need to tell you. There were publications that are now more than 10 years old in peer reviewed journal articles. I'm skeptical about whether they're always very honest. But there were peer reviewed journal articles showing that lipid nanoparticles were recognized over a decade ago Speaker 1: of having a particular property, which you're not going Speaker 0: to like to hear, which shocked me when I learned it. It tends to deposit their payload into the ovaries. That is exactly what happened with these injected materials. There was at least one study performed with the Pfizer agents, with the Japanese regulatory authorities. Low and behold, the material accumulated in the ovaries of the test animals. That is what's happened, ladies and gentlemen. Every woman and girl injected with these materials. Remember what I said about designing molecules to do things deliberately with objectives in mind? They picked lipid nanoparticles knowing they accumulate the payload in ovaries. It's not an accident. Mistakes were not made. So I tell you as a professional who spent his whole honest scientific career in an industry I did not realize was corrupt, trying to make experimental medicines for respiratory and allergy diseases, that my experience tells me that there are multiple independent, unnecessary, and obvious mechanisms of toxicity built into these so called vaccines. And then, by sheer luck, all four companies, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, all shows basically the same formula for their so called vaccines. That would never happen if it was real. For a start, I would call my opposite numbers and say, we should do different things because if something goes wrong, if we're wrong in an assumption, all of the all of the so called vaccines will fail for the same reason. We should do different things. It's called diversification. But now they all did the same things because they're just lying. They were making intentionally dangerous material, passing them off as vaccines, jabbing you and your children. Speaker 1: And that's what they did. Of course, I didn't get injected, neither did my children and most of my relatives. Some of them didn't believe me. I'm afraid they've been injected too. So big picture, what happens, I think, from the research I've done, and, Speaker 0: of course, I'm an expert in research and development, not in politics. But I believe that very wealthy people, the kind of people who run foundations with names, have plans as have their antecedents for a couple of generations to to take over the world, to remove the freedoms of ordinary people like us that they regard as useless leaders. Speaker 1: They don't want us around anymore. And their Speaker 0: intention, is to strip us of our freedoms by persuading us that there were very frightening events occurring in the world, and we need them to lead us to safety. There are documents you can find from a group called The Club of Rome, who in the late 19 sixties were commissioned by some of these people who run NAMES Global Foundations that have 100 of 1,000,000,000 of pounds of worth. They were asked to come up with scenarios that would produce challenges to countries that couldn't be solved by countries on their own. So they would have to look outwards and upwards to supranational solutions. Now guess what? The two things they came up with. Pandemics of infectious diseases, which I know as an immunologist are not possible and have never happened. Speaker 1: The other thing they said, to account for or plan for were climate change crises. Speaker 0: I've done enough research in our relations center, but I've spoken to people who have spent as long in climate atmospheric research as I have in pharmaceutical r and d. And they have explained to me, and I understand very well, that there's all of this nonsense about carbon dioxide, global boiling, net zero. It's it's all a complete scam from the same people who bought you the COVID scam and the dangerous injections. It's the same people. They want one world government. They want to be deprived of your liberty. And then I'm afraid, I think they will kill us using these injections because they're going to do it again. All over the world, factories to make mRNA based materials are being thrown up. Billions of doses are being made. And if we let them, they will sicken in our arms, and people will sicken and die. So those of you who have been injured or bereaved, in my mind, no blame whatsoever attaches to you. How could you know that people you trusted and thought you could trust were lying to you? Well, that you didn't know. But if you let them inject you again, you have no sympathy from me because they have lied to you, been in church, or killed. And I've explained to you that they're liars and they have taxes. So if you go along with it, it cannot be saved. All we need to do is enough of us to continue to speak out about this and say, we're not having it anymore. Get lost. So don't listen to lies anymore. People who've lied to you, forfeit their trust forever in my view. And so anyone who's in Speaker 1: the political process, for example, in Northern Ireland looking at this so called public health bill, which if you pass it, would allow the supernational criminals to take you from your house, to reject you, by force if necessary. They are aiding and abetting a global crime. And, I saw someone online say recently that if you pass that legislation, I don't think it'd be unreasonable to interpret that as an act of war. It's as serious as that. So politicians, you may well be under pressure from shadowy figures. But if you go along with it, and Speaker 0: I hope for, like, an easier time of it, you will have you will have enabled unlock the doors of hell and pushed everybody in it, and you as long with it as well. So this is your time to do what I'm doing, which is to speak out no matter the consequences. I say to you, if you're frightened about what happens, if you speak out, you should be absolutely terrified about what's going to happen Speaker 1: if you don't. So, Speaker 0: really, that's all I've got to say. You know, I do think these criminals are gonna do it again. They're continuing to threaten us with pandemics like bird flu, monkeypox, and so on. It is all nonsense. Stop listening to liars right now. Put things right between you, the people you love, and between you and God, if you haven't already. And for goodness sake, be one of the people who speaks out no matter what the consequences because if you turn us, we'll lose our freedom and then our lives. Thank you.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format https://www.aussie17.com/p/dr-mike-yeadons-address-to-northern

Dr Mike Yeadon's Address to Northern Ireland Parliament "I came quickly to the conclusion that they wanted to bring about toxicity that would injure, kill and reduce fertility." aussie17.com
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 9:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During lockdown, a significant number of care home residents were prescribed end-of-life medications, leading to thousands of deaths in Scotland and England. This practice, framed as "anticipatory care," raises serious ethical concerns, with claims of blanket DNR orders issued without family consent and falsified signatures. The NHS/NICE guidelines reportedly encouraged the use of drugs like Midazolam and Morphine, which can cause severe respiratory issues. Testimonies from the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry highlight these troubling actions, suggesting state-sanctioned harm.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 9 times out of 10 Care Home residents were prescribed ‘End of Life’ medication during Lockdown What followed was 5,000 deaths in just 10 weeks at Scottish Care Homes and 50,000 in England…..

Video Transcript AI Summary
Antibiotics were often prescribed, but if a resident didn't improve, "just in case" medication was given. Consulting with GPs was done over the phone, and regardless of symptoms, "just in case" medication was typically prescribed. It could take months to get a GP to visit a resident's home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mentioned that often all that would happen was that just in case medication would be prescribed. If it was something more mild, were you able to get things like antibiotics and Speaker 1: milder Yeah, we prescribed antibiotics but nine times out of 10 if a resident didn't get better from that, it was just in case it was prescribed. Speaker 0: Thank you. Ms Curry, in your experience Speaker 1: No, we didn't get any GP's and we consulted with GP's over the phone and nine times out of 10, regardless of what the resident's symptoms were, they were prescribed just in case medication. We really, really, really struggled. I think it was months and months before we got a GP into her home.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Just-In-Case medication = Anticipatory Care medicine= End-of-Life drugs It’s just a nicer way of saying “We are going to kill you now”

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Link to the full transcript + witness statements from the day⬇️ https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearing/impact-hearing-health-social-care-day-30

Impact Hearing | Health and Social Care | Day 30 | Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry Day 30 of the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry's Health and Social Care Impact Hearings.Date: 26 March 2024Time: 9.45am Please note the timetable below is provisional and subject to change. covid19inquiry.scot

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

From the same day at the Inquiry 26/3/2024 This should have brought the entire house of cards crashing down 0 (zero) media coverage of those testimonies

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

They killed your elderly relatives in Care Homes… Then blamed it on ‘COVID’… https://t.co/Ldw7TXYcYv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The numbers of people who died of COVID are skewed because many unwell individuals were classified as suspected COVID cases without testing. Other health conditions seemed nonexistent during COVID, and care home residents who became unwell were automatically considered COVID positive. The numbers don't accurately reflect COVID deaths. According to Lisa DiGiacomo, a director with Open Ministry Healthcare, deaths were classified as suspected or COVID-related, even with underlying health conditions. Scott Finnegan, Group General Manager for First, agrees with this assessment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Death, and actually, the the numbers of people who died in the COVID are very screwed because there's lots of people who just took unwell were were were classed as suspected COVID without any tests being carried out. There was lots of workloads that actually because, it seemed that other kind of health conditions didn't exist during COVID, and if you took unwell when you were living in a care home, you were just automatically considered as as being COVID positive. And think there was a lot of frustration about that as well because the numbers don't actually reflect the amount of people that sadly passed away from COVID. Speaker 1: As Scott clearly said, it wasn't all about Covid positive deaths, it was suspected Covid or Covid related, where it may have been another underlying health condition. I'm Lisa DiGiacomo, I'm a director with Open Ministry Healthcare. Speaker 0: Scott Finnegan, Group General Manager for First and

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Midazolam Matt Hancock April 2020

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

In the week that Matt Hancock promoted the ‘Assisted Dying Bill’ Let us remember his role in promoting End of Life medicines during lockdown⬇️ ‘A Good Death’ by Matt Hancock & Dr Luke Evans https://youtube.com/shorts/4WozgdHS8WI?feature=shared https://t.co/0IdUNAST0i

Video Transcript AI Summary
Good death requires equipment, medication, and staff. The NHS has enough syringe drivers to deliver medications for comfort during passing. Precautions are in place to ensure sufficient medications like midazolam and morphine. Morphine is prescribed per patient to prevent abuse. Relaxing morphine prescribing laws for doctors and healthcare professionals could reduce waste in healthcare homes. The government is keeping the reduction of key medicine wastage under review.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good death needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication and it needs the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away? Yes, we do. The second one is with that, that's the syringe drivers deliver medication, particularly things like midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered? Yes. And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused. So I have to prescribe it for Mr. Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a healthcare home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine. Have you considered relaxing the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and healthcare professionals so that there isn't waste. That's something that we keep under review. I've looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of key medicines.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Scottish Covid Inquiry | Full Documentary | https://youtu.be/bojR7A5MKPA?si=faXtUa_OCIRumdFk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Care Home Excess Deaths in 2020 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 No excess before lockdown 100% excess during lockdown No excess after lockdown https://t.co/VVNTUWYZ0h

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

DO NOT RESUSCITATE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨DO NOT RESUSCITATE🚨 💥 Blanket DNR orders across entire Care Homes 💥 DNR orders without families consent 💥 Falsified signatures 💥 No GP call outs to Care Homes 💥 Ambulances & Hospital access denied for Care Home residents https://t.co/jo8mnJn3P2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The inquiry anticipates hearing that people were pressured into DNR notices, were not resuscitated without a notice, and may have been neglected and left to starve. Families may not have been told the truth about the cause of death, and the usual death certification process was altered. A solicitor produced a DNR order with a name printed in block letters, not a normal signature. A witness stated they told the care home categorically that they did not want a DNR order in place for their grandmother. A care home manager said there was a push from the NHS to implement more DNRs. One home received DNR/ACPR forms for all residents who didn't have one. Challenges arose when families wanted their loved ones to receive hospital treatment for non-COVID ailments, but facilities wouldn't accept them. It was stated that GPs were said to have discussed DNR forms with families, but this didn't seem to be the case. The process was rushed, with a focus on who needed a DNR because they wouldn't be able to go to the hospital. There was no individual consideration, and care homes weren't asked about a resident's health when considering DNRs. Access to ambulances and hospitals was limited, leading to DNR decisions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We anticipate the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices. That people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place. That residents may have been neglected and left to starve. That families are not sure they were told the truth about their relatives' cause of death that the usual process for certification of deaths was departed from. Speaker 1: The solicitor produced the do not resuscitate order and it had my name on it and it was dated on the November 2. Kind of block capital letters with my name. Speaker 2: So in other words, not your normal signature? Speaker 1: Not my signature at all. Speaker 3: And could the care home have understood from the discussion that they had with you that you might be authorizing a DNR notice for your grandmother? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My exact words to them were categorically I do not want to put a do not resuscitate order in place. Speaker 2: My name is Peter McCormick. I'm the manager. I guess there was an impression that there was, I'm not sure that's the right phrase, but a push on by the NHS to get more of these things in place. In one of our homes, we received DNA ACPRs for all of our residents that hadn't already got one in place. Speaker 4: The difficulty you then had was if the family member had said, well, if my loved one becomes unwell, not specifically COVID related, just with anything, and hospital treatments required, then, yeah, I would still like them to go. That was then the challenge because you weren't able to put them anywhere because nobody would take them. Speaker 2: But I think there was a restriction in terms of access to care for people in care homes. I think that was a decision that must have been made by the NHS. But that doesn't appear that wasn't a discussion that was held in the full public light. And I think had it been, well, there have been people with all sorts of opinions, but it seemed to be a decision that was made very low key, not very well publicized, but was a reality of the first couple of years of the pandemic anyway. Speaker 5: On page five of the statement, I think it's a section that you've commented on, Ms Ling. You state that you were advised GPs had discussions with families about DNA CPR forms Then subsequently all residents who didn't previously have such forms were issued with them. But despite being told by the GPs that these discussions had taken place, your impression was that that wasn't actually the case? I think Why did you what created that impression for I Speaker 4: think it was because it was very much something that was just rushed. So it was updated ACPs, your anticipated career plans, which was fine. And then it was you need to look at who doesn't have DNRs because they will now then need to have one. And so when that was the discussion that was had with myself, I had said at the time, well, I can't make that decision. You'll you'll need to speak to the families about that, but I can let you know who doesn't have one. Because standard practice would be for the GP to have that discussion with the family member if the resident wasn't able to have that discussion themselves. And then within a couple of days, you then did then get these outstanding DNRs that we didn't have previously. So you would question whether that was something that was done in conjunction with families because the initial conversation was it's just they need to have them now because they won't be able to go to hospital because they just didn't want to take them. Speaker 5: Yeah. So essentially there was no nuance. There was, the conversation you had was based on there being no nuance, no individual consideration, just that everybody Yeah. In your care home who's resident there must have one of Yes, because Speaker 4: they wouldn't be going to hospital if they were unwell. Speaker 5: And I take it on that basis then you weren't asked about your impression of a particular resident's health and frailty as part of the consideration of whether was clinically appropriate to put the DNA CPR measures? Speaker 4: No, we weren't. And even when residents who did have COVID or maybe didn't have COVID just became unwell, you know, as people still continue to do throughout the pandemic, it was very much a cut and dry. You know, you got advice over the telephone, but you still you would have to fight very, very hard and challenge a lot to get someone admitted to hospital when you could clearly see that if they went to hospital, they had a really good chance of improving, of getting over, but, you know, it was making them unwell in the first place. But it was almost like you were not playing God, but it was just, no, you can't go. You just have to stay there. You could have gotten better if you'd been given the chance. Speaker 5: And your understanding is the lack of ability to access an ambulance, paramedics or hospital was the reason for these DNA CPR decisions being put in place? Yeah. Had you ever previously experienced a time where every resident your care had to have this? No.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

People asking where the directive came from: Straight from the NHS/NICE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

“Sedation and opioid use should NOT be withheld because of an inappropriate fear of causing RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION” COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community NICE guideline NG163 Published: 3 April 2020 https://files.elfsightcdn.com/5266f37f-1e60-4e3b-9202-0f9e41473266/2a4df24d-b4c4-4056-aec6-c4bbd5c11090.pdf https://t.co/pRel3HLhaq

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

#Midazolam

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 MIDAZOLAM NICE Guidance NG163 instructed the use of End-of-Life drugs Midazolam + Morphine to ‘treat’ elderly patients with ‘COVID’ Giving Midazolam with Morphine causes Respiratory Depression - like they are being WATERBOARDED!! https://t.co/vVF3NfpUXC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker received a call from a care home stating her father had fallen and was agitated, and would be given morphine. She was shocked he was on an end-of-life path of injecting to stop his issues. She later learned midazolam, one of the medications being used, is considered by some practitioners to be like being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. The speaker was not advised about a specific end-of-life care plan for her father. She expressed concerns to the care home manager about what she had seen and the way end-of-life care was being administered. Despite a DNR in place from the first care home, she learned her father had been mobile and trying to get to the toilet. She felt it was a random decision to keep him quiet, in isolation, in a comatose state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was then told they were going to introduce end of life medication, which would be midazolam and if needed, and morphine, and I was shocked. Tuesday, April 21, I got a phone call again from the care home to tell me my dad had fallen out of bed again. He was very restless and agitated, and he was to be given morphine. I was shocked to find out he was not on a a related path of injecting to stop his issues, and this is where the confusion comes in because when you hear that somebody's on end of life care, you imagine, as I said earlier, that somebody is, you know, at peace. They're in pain. They can be in peace. And that that's the medication he was given, midazolam and morphine, would be helping him. Subsequently from that, I found out that midazolam isn't a particularly nice drug, and some practitioners refer it to being being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. And I I don't know if it's been removed, but I believe those motions are foot to look in at the the use of midazolam and morphine in end of life care. Speaker 1: Were you ever advised about a specific care plan in terms of end of life care for your father at the point Speaker 0: At that point? Speaker 1: Yeah. No. Did you know what the care plan was to be? Speaker 0: I didn't. No. I didn't know exactly what was going on, and, subsequently, there was a conversation with a doctor. Speaker 1: And tell me about what was said in that conversation. Speaker 0: I'd expressed my concerns to the returning new care home manager that I was distressed and upset about what I was what I'd seen, what was happening, and the way the end of life care was being administered. I was confused because I mean, there was a DNR put in place from the first care home. However, you know, I think anybody here would think to themselves that when they start introducing end of life care that there's no way back and that the person is beyond hope. And yet I found out that my father had been mobile. He'd been walking about. He had poor man had been trying to get to the toilet. He'd been shouting for help. And they had started, in my opinion, it was it was almost like a random decision to keep him quiet, keep him in isolation, in a room, in a comatose state.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Human Rights Act

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨The most powerful moment of the entire Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry remains the testimony given by Shelagh McCall on behalf of Bereaved Relatives Group SKYE…. State sanctioned murder Please watch and share🙏 https://t.co/6RvAd6II0a

Video Transcript AI Summary
The inquiry will investigate if the right to life was protected in care homes, including potential pressure for "do not resuscitate" notices, lack of resuscitation, and neglect. Evidence may point to systemic failures in care delivery, regulation, and inspection in Scotland. The bereaved want to know how the virus entered locked-down care homes and spread. The inquiry will hear that people were transferred from hospitals to care homes without testing, potentially ignoring local capacity and patient interests. Blanket bans on visits exacerbated the situation, denying families contact with loved ones. Some staff risked their jobs to inform families, while some management prioritized reputation over resident care. Families faced unanswered calls, were treated with disdain, and witnessed deterioration in health, suspecting neglect. Records were sometimes missing or incomplete. The inquiry must investigate potential violations of the prohibition on torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. The inquiry should consider whether inspection and regulatory regimes were fit for purpose and the impact of restrictions on family life. The group wants to ensure that no family member, no care home resident and no care worker in the future has to go through what they and their loved ones suffered during Covid-nineteen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The inquiry must investigate whether the right to life under Article two was respected and protected. We anticipate the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices. That people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place. That residents may have been neglected and left to starve. This group is made up of people whose relatives died in care homes, as well as care workers who bore witness to the conditions in those homes. As well as revealing the suffering of individuals and their families, we anticipate that the evidence in these hearings will point to a systemic failure of the model for the delivery of care in Scotland, for its regulation and inspection. In due course, this group will be asking you to make recommendations that will ensure that the elderly and vulnerable are properly cared for, and that what happened during COVID-nineteen cannot happen again. The bereaved want to know how it was and why it was that the virus was able to enter care homes when they were in lockdown ahead of the rest of society, and how the virus was then able to spread like wildfire within the homes. The inquiry will hear evidence that people were transferred into care homes from hospitals without testing. This happened at a national level, with no obvious consideration given to local capacity or the best interests of patients and residents. It was at a time when it appears no Scottish hospital had reached a level of capacity that might have signalled an imminent critical incident necessitating such a step. The situation was only exacerbated by the decision of government that there should be a blanket ban on face to face visits with those in care homes. It's a natural human response to be as close as possible to a loved one in the final phase of their life. This was denied to care home residents and their relatives. The enquiry we hear that when relatives tried to contact their loved ones by video conference or telephone, their efforts were thwarted. Excuses were given about malfunctioning iPads, problems with the Wi Fi network. The excuses kept changing. In some instances, management told staff not to share with the outside world what was going on in a home. Some staff formed the view that management cared more about their reputation in the community and the protection of their business than they did about the residents, their families and the care workers who do the job not for the money but because their heart is in it. Some staff went behind management's back, risking their jobs to keep families informed. Families' calls went unanswered over days and sometimes weeks. On some occasions when contact was made, families were treated with disdain as if they were an inconvenience. Families were told their loved one was fine, only to get a sudden hurried phone call that they were dying. Many families witnessed remotely a significant deterioration of their loved one's physical and mental health in lockdown that was nothing to do with Covid-nineteen. Some suspected their loved one was suffering from neglect, dehydration and starvation. Questions were asked and relatives were fobbed off. The blanket ban on visits meant that care plans could not be checked. The inquiry will hear that when records were requested after a loved one's death relatives found that the records were missing or incomplete. When relatives did manage to make contact over video with their loved one and witness for themselves the deterioration in their condition, there is evidence that at times their wishes about medical treatment were ignored or overridden. The reality for bereaved relatives is that some did not see their loved ones face to face again after the lockdown began. The right to visit during the last moments of life was not always granted and if it was it was restricted to one family member. Some residents died alone. Care home staff witnessed many excess deaths. They held people's hands as they died. That trauma will never leave some of them. After death some relatives were not given all their loved ones belongings back. They suspect they were burned in spite of having been quarantined. After death some relatives were so concerned about what had occurred that they reported the death to the police. They want to know how it got to that stage. The inquiries promise to take a human rights based approach and hearing first from those impacted by the pandemic is a recognition of that approach in action and that is welcomed. But a meaningful human rights based approach goes far beyond that. The inquiry must investigate whether the right to life under Article two was respected and protected. We anticipate the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices, that people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place, that residents may have been neglected and left to starve, that families are not sure they were told the truth about their relatives cause of death, that the usual process for certification of death was departed from. The inquiry must investigate potential violations of Article three, the prohibition on torture in human and degrading treatment. Relatives will speak of their loved ones lacking food, water and hygiene that there was inadequate, inappropriate, absent or delayed medical attention that welfare attorneys' views were not listened to when it came to medical treatment that there was inadequate staffing to provide proper care resulting in residents suffering unnecessarily. We urge the inquiry to consider whether in light of people's lived experience the inspection and regulatory regimes were fit for purpose to prevent or remedy these harms. An inquiry must also consider the impact of the restrictions that were put in place in care homes on the rights of residents and their loved ones to a family life under Article eight. We expect the evidence will demonstrate that no proper efforts were made towards maintaining relationships and that people's health declined as a result. When you come to hear from the decision makers and those who implemented the decisions and the restrictions, we want you to ask did those people take a human rights based approach? Did they consider that the result of their decisions and the restrictions that followed would be the situations that the inquiry is going to hear about in this first tranche of hearings. Fundamental to a human rights based approach are accountability and a guarantee of non repetition. Most of all, what this group wants the inquiry to ensure is that no family member, no care home resident and no care worker in the future has to go through what they and their loved ones suffered during Covid-nineteen.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

COVID MISATTRIBUTION

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🎙The Doctors were lying to me on a daily basis. Nurses were lying to me on a daily basis….. COVID MISATTRIBUTION Pamela provides an explosive testimony on behalf of her brother, James, at the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry…. https://t.co/w316XA7M0R

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's brother, James, died in Ninewells Hospital in May 2021 at age 41. She describes him as a healthy, kind chef. After being taken to the hospital, she believed he was in the best place. However, she later learned from his medical records that doctors tried to put him on a ventilator, which angered her because this wasn't communicated to her. She communicated with her brother via text for the first few days, but then he was given lorazepam and ventilated. The family didn't want him on a ventilator due to low chances of recovery. He developed ventilator-associated pneumonia, which she discovered later in his records. The death certificate cited SARS COVID-2 as the cause of death. She noted a discrepancy in the time of death, raising questions about resuscitation. She requested investigations into his death, focusing on his participation in a trial where the signature on the consent form didn't appear to be his. She questioned whether trial drugs caused an allergic reaction. She also discovered he was prescribed toxomolobab, an immune suppression drug, making him more susceptible to hospital-acquired infections. She claims doctors and nurses lied to her daily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctors were lying to me on a daily basis. Nurses were lying to me on a daily basis. Everything that was in my brother's notes was different from what I was being told on a daily basis. Speaker 1: It's about your brother James. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: We know that James sadly died in Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on the 10/05/2021. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: And he was 41. Yeah. And you tell us a little bit about him. In your statement he was a chef and he worked all over Scotland. Speaker 0: Yeah, that's correct. Speaker 1: Did James have any children himself? Two. You also say that he was kind, was helpful. Speaker 0: Very, and good. Speaker 1: And you describe him as generally as a healthy individual. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 1: I think after trying to get in touch with NHS twenty four, your brother was taken to A and E at Ninewells. Speaker 0: Well I thought he was in the best place. I thought he was just gonna get a drip and, you know, he was in there for, like, dehydration and everything would be okay. Speaker 1: At paragraph 15 you say that you now know or you know now that they were trying to put him on a ventilator. How did you come by that knowledge? Speaker 0: Because I obtained my brother's medical records and I read them every page. Speaker 1: And what was your reaction to finding that out? Speaker 0: That my brother must have been scared and I was angry. Speaker 1: Why were you angry? Speaker 0: Because the messages that I was getting from my brother and obviously he didn't tell me how scared he was and you know, I don't know, was angry. I angry. I was angry because the things that I read in his notes wasn't what the doctors were saying to me on a daily basis. The doctors were lying to me on a daily basis. Nurses were lying to me on a daily basis. Everything that was in my brother's notes was different from what I was being told on a daily basis. Speaker 1: I think you mentioned to me a few moments ago that you were able to keep in touch with your brother. Speaker 0: It was only for the first couple of days. My brother went into hospital on a Friday night. By half past ten on Friday night, were told my brother was going to die. We were communicating via messages and stuff like that, brother, you okay? And you know, he was texting back and I got a thumbs up in one of the pictured messages that sent me. I was telling him that he had to eat and he was going to be okay and got some fluids and that in him. That was happening for the first couple of days. That happened over the course of the weekend. Speaker 1: You note that things went a little bit quiet and you discovered from his records that your brother had been given lorazepam. Speaker 0: Yes, so I think that was the night that he was ventilated. So he got ventilated early hours of the Monday morning, which was the twenty first. Went out of the hospital on the September 17. He started to become, you know, he wasn't responding. I'm saying, Brother, are you there? Are you there? Answer me. Just give me a wee thumbs up, just give me someone. But I think it was by tea time on the Monday night, you know, I just wasn't getting any responses from him. So I had phoned the hospital and I asked them, have you given my brother anything? They told me that he was on a CPAP but he may start to get tired. So then I asked them and he told me that he was eating and he was drinking and he was good. And then I asked them, have you given my brother infant? Have you made my brother tired because he's not responding to me? So there was quite a discussion with one of the nurses, it got a bit heated. Speaker 1: What was your attitude towards your brother possibly being put on a ventilator, or indeed his attitude to that happening? Speaker 0: We didn't want that to happen. Why not? Because the chances of coming off one were no good. That was quite evident you were saying that people were going on them and no coming off them. Speaker 1: You say at paragraph 25 that he developed a ventilator associated pneumonia or VAP. Speaker 0: Yes. So I had Speaker 1: Is that something you found out afterwards? Speaker 0: Yeah, so I had a friend whose husband had also been in hospital with COVID and he was on maximum oxygen for three weeks. So what I can understand is why the ventilator was being pushed on my brother and I'm not a doctor but I thought why can you not just give my brother maximum oxygen for three weeks if that's what it takes, why is there such a hurry to put him on a ventilator? Sorry, with regards to the ventilator associated pneumonia, nobody told me about that. I found that out later. Speaker 1: It was something you found out from his record. Speaker 2: Yeah. In the early stages of the pandemic, COVID-nineteen patients with severe respiratory distress were often treated aggressively with intravenous fluids and mechanical ventilation. It became apparent however that intravenous fluids could exacerbate fluid in the lungs and further reduce oxygenation. Speaker 1: What he did tell you was that James had had a cardiac arrest. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: And I think one of the infections that your brother had had was MRSA which had caused damage to his face. A death certificate in relation to your brother was released which certified that cause of death was SARS COVID. Speaker 0: SARS COVID two was the only thing on my brother's death certificate. Speaker 1: I think you made the point there was a very small discrepancy about the actual time of death as well. Speaker 0: Yeah, and that also brought in a question whether or not my brother was resuscitated. Speaker 1: You've asked for a considerable number of investigations into how your brother died. Speaker 0: Yeah, that's correct. And can you Speaker 1: just tell us about those investigations? What investigations have you asked for? What are you looking for? Speaker 0: Well, what had happened was my brother was put on a trial and I found through his notes that the signature wasn't his. It was a study investigator, I believe, signature that had signed him up for this trial. Now we've got a man that didn't go to doctors, didn't have any medications, you know he was allergic to penicillin, that's about all we knew. So these trial drugs and stuff, I had a query about why my brother was given these drugs, could anything have happened to him by being given these drugs, was it an allergic reaction that he had? That was about all I knew at the time of his passing until I obviously obtained his medical records and then found out lots of other things. By reading through the records and discrepancies at the time of death and then all the infections that he had and being lied to on a daily basis from the doctors I tried to then get a private postmortem and I was supported by my funeral directors to contact Health Improvement Scotland Speaker 1: Presumably from having read your brother's medical records the various hospital acquired infections that were disclosed. Speaker 0: That's a One thing, Speaker 1: I'm sorry, give me a moment. The one thing that you do make a note there is that you also found out that he'd been prescribed an immune suppression drug which may have made him more susceptible to those infections. Speaker 0: So that's a toxomolobab. He was given that and what that does is suppresses your immune system. Now he was already vulnerable and in a hospital. He didn't have these infections when he went in. And then he ended up with all of these.
Saved - February 16, 2025 at 11:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel sick thinking about how the elderly in care homes were treated. They were given lethal doses of Midazolam and Morphine, falsely labeled as COVID deaths to support a fabricated crisis. Since 2021, I've been exposing this, and now a senior coroner's confirmation is revealing the truth. The government pushed these drugs, leading to horrific deaths that were not peaceful. Many were not terminally ill, yet they were left to die alone. This was a premeditated act, and we must demand justice for those lives lost. If we don't stand up, it could happen again.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

🧵: THEY KNEW. THEY LIED. THEY MURDERED THEM. 1/ Every time I go back to this, it makes me sick. The elderly in care homes were not cared for. They were systematically killed with Midazolam and Morphine and their deaths were falsely recorded as COVID to fuel a manufactured crisis.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

2/ Since 2021, many of us have been exposing this. We were ridiculed, ignored, and silenced. But now, with a senior coroner confirming the truth, the cover-up is crumbling. The state executed the vulnerable and called it a pandemic.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

3/ HOW THEY DID IT: The government issued guidelines pushing the use of Midazolam and Morphine in care homes. These drugs were given via syringe drivers, ensuring a continuous, unrecoverable dose.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

4/ If you have breathing difficulties, Midazolam and Morphine do not ease your suffering. They suffocate you. The combination depresses your central nervous system until your lungs fail completely.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

5/ This was not some gentle drifting off into the night. This was not peaceful palliative care. It was the medical equivalent of waterboarding someone to death.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

6/ Imagine drowning, but instead of water filling your lungs, it's your own body's failure to inhale. You try to breathe, but your muscles do not respond. Your lungs are paralysed. Your brain screams for oxygen. But nothing happens.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

7/ That is how they died. Slowly. Silently. Terrified. And then their deaths were signed off as COVID to justify lockdowns, emergency powers, and a global vaccination campaign.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

8/ Many of these people were not terminally ill. They were not dying from COVID. But they were written off, given fatal doses, and left to die in silence—alone, isolated from their families.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

9/ What was happening in hospitals at the same time? Ventilators, Remdesivir, and DNRs, protocols designed to kill. At every stage, the goal was death.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

10/ They NEEDED the death numbers to justify what they were doing. Lockdowns, mass testing, mail-in ballots, vaccine rollouts, all of it relied on creating a perception of mass death.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

11/ If people had recovered, the fear campaign would have failed. If people had lived, they couldn’t have called it a pandemic. Instead, they euthanised them and sold it as a humanitarian crisis.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

12/ The legal case is now undeniable. The guidelines were there. The prescriptions were there. The syringe drivers were there. The false death certificates were there.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

13/ This was not incompetence. This was premeditated mass murder. A government-orchestrated culling of the elderly, hidden in plain sight.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

14/ And now, the coroner’s confirmation is exposing it all. The same system that tried to cover it up is now being forced to admit what was done.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

15/ But we knew years ago. We were screaming about this in 2021. We saw it, we called it out, and we were ignored. Now the world is catching

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

16/ So what happens next? Do we let them walk away from this? Do we allow them to rewrite history? Or do we demand justice for the thousands of lives they stole?

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

17/ This is bigger than COVID. This is about a system that executed its own citizens and then lied to the world about it.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

18/ If we do not stand for those murdered in care homes, then who will? If we do not expose this, it will happen again.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

19/ Justice is coming. And when it does, those responsible must face consequences so severe that nothing like this can ever happen again.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

20/ Share this thread. Make noise. Do not let them bury this.

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

EVIDENCE (numbered to match the thread, fully comprehensive) 1️⃣ Government protocol to remove elderly & disabled from hospitals back into the community 📄 Source: https://tinyurl.com/5dcfap57

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

2️⃣ Protocol stopping elderly & disabled from gaining hospital care 📄 Source: https://tinyurl.com/ycku67wm

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

3️⃣ COVID Decision Support Tool (Scoring Matrix) – Who gets treatment, who gets left to die 📄 Source: https://tinyurl.com/4hsxhyn9

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

4️⃣ Investigation into mass DNR orders that placed people on End-of-Life care pathways 📄 Source: https://tinyurl.com/39r4re5m

Overview | COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community | Guidance | NICE COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community web.archive.org

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

5️⃣ NICE Protocol NG163—a step-by-step manual for dealing with COVID+ people in the community 📄 Source: https://tinyurl.com/795tpym9

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

6️⃣ NHS End-of-Life protocol—same Midazolam dosage for "anxiety" as for euthanasia 📄 Source: https://tinyurl.com/2p8kk8kk

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

7️⃣ BNF (British National Formulary) Midazolam dosage guide and known respiratory suppression risks 📄 Source: https://bnf.nice.org.uk/drugs/midazolam

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

8️⃣ UK Government purchased 2 years' supply of Midazolam in weeks – proving premeditation 📄 Source: https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-11-22/3234

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

9️⃣ Maajid Nawaz: Senior coroner confirms Midazolam played a role in deaths 📄 Source: https://open.substack.com/pub/maajidnawaz/p/breaking-senior-coroner-confirms

BREAKING: Senior Coroner Confirms Full Medical Inquest into Midazolam Death Case Next Month Senior Coroner Sets Inquest Date for March 17th - March 21st maajidnawaz.substack.com

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

🔟 "A Good Death"—A documentary on how people were murdered with Midazolam 📄 Source: https://ugetube.com/watch/a-good-death-jacqui-deevoy-ickonic_mbVzww3HAB6o35v.html

A Good Death? - Jacqui Deevoy - Ickonic The quiet euthanization of elderly and terminally ill UK citizens using Morphine and Midazolam (under the guise of Covid). ugetube.com

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

1️⃣1️⃣ UK Government discussing the use of Midazolam to ensure "A Good Death" 📄 Source: https://t.co/4M49PemEnv

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

28) Matt Hancock and in the UK Government discussing the use of MIDAZOLAM to ensure “A Good Death” https://t.co/9XSFFe0gPZ

@chrislittlewoo8 - Chris Littlewood

@threadreaderapp unroll please

Saved - February 23, 2025 at 10:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
My dad is back in the hospital with a chest infection. A doctor told me she wants to put a DNR on him after suggesting intubation. I insisted on antibiotics and treatment instead. I'm terrified to leave him alone; I just want him to pull through.

@_janey_j - Janey

My poor dad taken into hospital again with a chest infection - A bitch NHS Dr told me she’s putting a DNR on him after telling me she wanted to intubate and ventilate him. She was warned not to do that, give him the anti biotics and treat him. She said the consultant will make the decision tomorrow. How fucking dare they. 😡Scared to leave my dad alone as these scumbags simply cannot be trusted. Praying my dad makes it through this 😢🙏🏼

View Full Interactive Feed