reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
On Juneteenth, I highlight a concerning statement by @POTUS regarding police brutality. In another post, Joe Biden's support for the death penalty in the "Biden Crime Bill" is discussed.
@Winslow20Don - 🇵🇸 No Biden No Trump
A THREAD TO REMEMBER @POTUS ON JUNETEENTH... In the aftermath of Rodney King, Biden advocates for police beating confessions out of suspects. https://t.co/kXFoWdRjL1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Police officers need clear guidance to protect us, even if it means using force. Should confessions obtained through force be admissible in court? The speaker questions this using the Rodney King case as an example. While they acknowledge the seriousness of a murder confession obtained through force, they argue that constitutional rights should not be denied, even in such cases. The speaker expresses uncertainty about the admissibility of such confessions, but ultimately believes that they should not be allowed in court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And expect police officers without clear guidance to do anything other than try to protect us by whatever means are necessary. I mean, I wonder what my friend from from California would said if this this beating case we saw out in, Los Angeles. If in the process of that beating, that person confessed to having murdered somebody, should it be admissible? If in the process of that beating, I asked that question to my friend. What what what was the fellow's name?
Rodney King. Rodney King. If when Rodney King was being beaten, the guy we saw in television, In the process of that beating, Rodney King confessed to a murder that he did commit. Should Rodney King be convicted under our laws? That's my question.
I don't know under those circumstances. I really don't. See, that's the problem. The fact of the matter is, the answer is probably not. Probably not.
Right. Yeah. I think I I don't know how the courts would construe that, but probably not. Well, usually the courts construe beatings, eliciting confessions as not a good thing. And the reason they do that is we have a proposition about self incrimination, in our country.
As a matter of fact, not only usually, always do they construe it that way. But my point is there would be, assuming somebody had committed a murder, if the police beat the confession out of him and he did commit the murder. He did commit the murder and confessed to it, and that's what convicted him. Now I wouldn't want that guy going free. I wouldn't want that person going free.
They did commit a heinous murder, but the only way we're able to convict him is the peep the police beat him up with a hose. Should that person be denied their constitutional rights? Well, my gut tells me no. Yes. They should be.
Hang them. They did it. But why is it that we don't allow those kinds of things to be admissible?
@Winslow20Don - 🇵🇸 No Biden No Trump
Listen to Joe Biden’s words: The “Biden Crime Bill,” which is before us, calls for the death penalty for 51 offenses. We do everything but hang people for jaywalking in this bill. https://t.co/qLttDy34Sf
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker supports the death penalty and authored a bill that included it for 4051 offenses. They believe in the death penalty and do not oppose it on moral grounds, stating that the bill does not go as far as hanging people for jaywalking.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biden crime bill is before us, calls for the death penalty for 4051 offenses. The first death federal death penalty after declared constitution was a bill written by me. I support the death penalty. I don't oppose the death penalty on moral grounds. We We do everything but hang people for jaywalking in this bill.
reSee.it AI Summary
This series of posts covers various topics related to Joe Biden. There are mentions of his past statements, actions, and controversies. Some posts highlight his involvement in the Civil Rights movement, while others criticize his remarks about black men and drug users. There is also a post discussing his stance on school integration. Overall, the posts provide a mix of positive and negative perspectives on Biden.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is gold. It would be a shame if it got around. https://t.co/0zK388lCHV
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are concerned about avian flu, lacking vaccines and police. Debating gay marriage and flag amendment seems unnecessary. The Defense of Marriage Act already defines marriage as between a man and a woman, with no challenges. Why push for a constitutional amendment? Marriage is clear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hand basket. We are desperately concerned about the circumstance relating to avian flu. We don't have enough vaccines. We don't have enough police officers, and we're gonna debate the next 3 weeks, I'm told. Gay marriage, a flag amendment, and god only knows what else.
I can't believe the American people can't see through this. We already have a law, the Defense of Marriage Act, where we've all voted, not where I voted, and others said, look. Marriage is between a man and a woman, and states must respect that. Nobody's violated that law. There's been no challenge to that law.
Why do we need a constitutional amendment? Marriage is between a man and a woman. What's the game going on here? And
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
But wait there's more. Flashback to 2006. https://t.co/gsoUr50tEK
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe abortion is always a tragedy, not a choice or right. It should be rare, safe, and efforts should focus on reducing the number of abortions. Finding common ground and consensus is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I do not view abortion as a, as a choice and a right. I think it's always a tragedy. And I think that, it should be, rare and safe. And I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions, and they ought to be able to have a common ground and consensus as to do
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
And this one... https://t.co/tVWVfydSsO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that a Supreme Court nominee should not have to reveal their stance on Roe v. Wade. They argue that knowing their position may not provide much insight into their future decisions. For example, a nominee could support Roe v. Wade but still vote for restrictive measures like the Webster decision. Ultimately, the speaker does not think that knowing a nominee's stance on Roe v. Wade would be very informative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should have to answer how he would rule on Roe. I do not believe he should have to do that because I think that sets a precedent that may very well come back and bite everything I believe in, even though I'd like to know how we would rule on Roe. Quite frankly, I'm not sure what it would tell us even if he told us he would sustain Roe. He might sustain Roe and vote for Webster. He might sustain Roe and say, yes.
You can't have an abortion in any facility that doesn't have hallways 14 feet wide. He might, say, sustain Roe and, you know, and so on. So I don't think it would tell us much.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
And this.... https://t.co/rUGdjfjNLe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Joseph Biden dropped out of the race due to plagiarism and exaggerations about his academic record, feeling angry and reluctant about his decision. This makes him the second Democratic candidate to exit the race over character and integrity concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hunter Joseph Biden dropped out of the hunt today, saying the disclosures about his plagiarism in law school and his exaggerations about his academic record made it impossible for him to continue. I do it with incredible reluctance, and it makes me angry. I'm angry with myself for having been put in the position put myself in the position of having to make this choice. The Delaware Democrat is the 2nd candidate to be forced from the race by questions of character and integrity.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Biden Thread https://t.co/xkluUQVNdI
Video Transcript AI Summary
I visited Kyiv for the 12th or 13th time to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. I asked for action against the state prosecutor, but they didn't comply. I threatened to withhold the money unless the prosecutor was fired within 6 hours.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kyiv, and I was supposed to announce that there's another $1,000,000,000 loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from, Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn't. So they said they had they're walking out the press conference. I said, no. I said, I'm not gonna we're not gonna give you the $1,000,000,000.
They said, you have no authority. You're not the president. The president said I said, call him. I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting a $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting a $1,000,000,000.
I'm gonna be leaving here. I think it was, what, 6 hours? I look at I said, I'm leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
More hypocrisy for this thread of Biden blunders. https://t.co/KPJqB737x3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden is accused of plagiarism multiple times, including using phrases without credit from Neil Kinnock and Robert Kennedy. He admitted to plagiarism in law school, calling it unintentional. Critics say he presents himself as inspiring, but using others' words is false advertising. Appropriating personal material from other politicians is seen as a bad move. The political community views his actions as dumb and immoral, questioning his suitability for the presidency. Voters will need to consider these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know I was thinking on the way over here. Now that's a little too much because as you point out what's behind the words? What's there? And a lot of people that rap on Biden has always been that it's just a surface.
Speaker 1: I should have said, to paraphrase Neil Kinnock, the only time I didn't in all the times I've ever used it.
Speaker 2: But CBS News found a tape of a second instance.
Speaker 3: It reappeared in the New York Times with a new charge that Biden had appropriated a famous litany from the late Robert Kennedy about what the gross national product cannot measure.
Speaker 4: Cannot measure the health of our children
Speaker 3: The health of our children.
Speaker 1: The quality of our education
Speaker 3: The quality of their education.
Speaker 1: The joy of their play
Speaker 3: For the joy of their play.
Speaker 1: Biden gave Kennedy no credit. He's also quoted or paraphrased John Kennedy, Hubert Humphrey, and British Labor Party leader, Neil Kinnock, all without credit.
Speaker 2: Joseph Biden admitted today that he committed plagiarism when he was in law school. He said it was a mistake, but that it was unintentional.
Speaker 1: He quoted 5 pages of someone else's work without proper citation.
Speaker 4: I've done some dumb things, and I'll do dumb things again. He was given an f. Ladies and gentlemen, I've been dumb.
Speaker 1: To the political community in Washington, it all seems of a piece. Plagiarism at law school, plagiarism on the stump.
Speaker 3: The great communicator. Strike that. The great imitator.
Speaker 5: You don't steal verbatim, or when you do as he did 99% of the time, you give credit.
Speaker 1: Biden's critics say he sells himself as a man whose words and visions can inspire a new generation in politics, but if the thoughts, phrases, and visions really belong to others, it's a form of false advertising.
Speaker 5: Is it a wise idea, though, to take something that personal anyway from another politician and try and appropriate it to your own campaign?
Speaker 3: I think it was a stupid thing to appropriate material that was really very personal. That was someone else's.
Speaker 6: Most people didn't know who he was. You know, Joe Biden, and now they're gonna say, oh, yeah. He's the guy who plagiarized. That's what it's first. Politically, that's devastating.
These clips are devastating. He looks like a Joe Biden wind up doll with somebody else's words coming out.
Speaker 1: If they're going to do things that are stupid as well as immoral, then they're probably too dumb to have the job of president.
Speaker 5: Voters are gonna have to
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
When Biden marched in the Civil Rights movement. 🧵 https://t.co/CDpyFAEbbo
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was involved in the civil rights movement as a high school kid, desegregating movie theaters and restaurants. I sat in black churches next to Jewish rabbis, preparing to desegregate movie theaters. Despite not actually marching, I remained engaged in civil rights causes since I was 18. Despite being reminded that I did not march, I continued to tell the story. This behavior is strange.
Translation: I participated in civil rights activities as a teenager, desegregating establishments and sitting in churches. Even though I didn't physically march, I stayed committed to civil rights causes. Despite being reminded of this, I continued to share the story, which is odd.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I
Speaker 1: marched in the civil rights movement, I did not march with a 12 point program. I marched with tens of thousands of others to change attitudes, and we changed attitudes.
Speaker 2: He lied to voters according to The New York Times, quoting aids of of Biden's about having marched in the civil rights movement.
Speaker 0: I got involved in the civil rights movement. I got involved in desegregated movie theaters. They organized voter registration drives from the time I got involved as a high school kid in the civil rights movement. But I was a kid involved in the civil rights movement, desegregating restaurants and movie theaters in my state. From the time I got involved, the kid in the civil rights movement, sit ins and desegregating restaurants.
And I got involved in civil rights movement, just as a kid, and that's why I got so deeply involved in my community with the civil rights movement. When I sat in black churches in east side of Wilmington getting ready to and by the way, next to Jewish 2 Jewish rabbis, getting ready to go out and desegregate movie theaters in Delaware. I come out of the civil rights and I start off in the black churches and we'd go from there to desegregate movie theaters. For real, I got involved in the civil rights movement. From the time I've been 18 years old, I've been involved in causes from the civil rights movement.
Got involved in the civil rights movement and desegregating restaurants, that kind of thing. Coming out of the civil rights movement and being involved with Jewish community as a kid in the civil rights movement. I got involved with civil rights movement. Get ready to go out. You said you did.
Restaurants and movie theaters. That's what got me involved in civil rights as a kid. I got very engaged, in my case, the civil rights movement.
Speaker 2: Quote, more than once, advisers had gently reminded mister Biden of the problem with this formulation. He had not actually marched during the civil rights movement. And more than once, mister Biden assured them that he understood and kept telling the story anyway. That is really, really weird.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
What do you make of this one? https://t.co/OXdo2HqH0K
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have regular phone calls with Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk, discussing Europe's reluctance to impose sanctions on Russia. Last year, I withheld a billion-dollar tranche until Ukraine fired its chief prosecutor. We are creating a roadmap for Ukraine's political steps and security guarantees from Russia. Ukraine has made progress in energy, but faces challenges like granting special status to regions. I believe they will succeed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. I I am not the pen pal, but the phone pal of Poroshenko and Arseniy Yatsenyuk and now the speaker. I literally, without exaggeration, the last, 4 years, I'm on the phone 2 to 3 hours a week with with with those folks. There's an overwhelming instinct in Europe to say, hey. Before you guys became president, this was owned by Russia anyway.
They had a puppet there. What difference does it make? What the hell is the difference? Why are you making us engage in these sanctions? You remember last year, I was authorized to say we do the second tranche of a $1,000,000,000 and he didn't fire his his, chief prosecutor.
And because I have the confidence of the president, I was there. I said, I'm not signing it. Until you fire him, we're not signing, man. Get it straight. We're not doing it.
Till you form a new government and you actually bring in someone who will move on this, we're not playing. Not because we're trying to play hardball, because we know if they give an excuse to the EU, there are at least 5 countries right now that wanna say, woah, we want out. At least 5 right now. And so, what we put together, we're putting together now is a basic detailed roadmap of who goes first and who goes second. There's 2 pieces of this, folks.
1 is the security guarantees that are to flow from Russia. Into the political steps that Ukraine has to take. And some of the steps are very difficult to take. They've already done the energy piece. They've done some other things.
But my point is that when you say the dumb boss is gonna have a special status and you're gonna amend your constitution, it's like saying, okay, you know, Texas and Wyoming Texas is gonna have a special status that we don't want because we want, Mexico to have more influence in Texas. And we're gonna pass that through the United States Congress. So there's some really tough stuff they've gotta do. They're willing I'm convinced they will do it.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
In 1993, Joe Biden delivered a speech calling Black men “predators on our streets.” Enjoy this 🧵 and kindly retweet. https://t.co/Ue5l00hoYB
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must take action against young people who pose a threat, regardless of their upbringing. If we don't intervene now, they may become predators in the future. Society's neglect has contributed to the presence of dangerous individuals on our streets. It is crucial to address this issue to protect our families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take back the streets. It doesn't matter whether or not the person that is accosting your son or daughter or my son or daughter, my wife, your husband, my mother, your parents, It doesn't matter whether or not they were deprived as a youth. It doesn't matter or not whether or not they had no background that enabled them to have to, become, social become socialized into the fabric of society. It doesn't matter whether or not they're the victims of society. The end result is they're about to knock my mother on the head with a lead pipe, shoot my sister, beat up my wife, take on my sons.
So I don't wanna ask what made them do this. They must be taken off the street. That's number 1. There's a consensus on that. Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing because they literally I yield myself 3 more minutes.
Because they literally have not been socialized. They literally have not had an opportunity. We should focus on them now. If we don't, they will or a portion of them will become the predators 15 years from now. And madam president, we have predators on our streets that society has in fact, in part because of its neglect, created.
Again, it does not mean because we created them that we somehow forgive them or do not take them out of society to protect my family and yours from
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
What is this? 2013... Enjoy this thread 👆🧵 https://t.co/gr3enG7gOF
Video Transcript AI Summary
I had 2 brain aneurysms, requiring surgery where they had to remove the top of my head. The doctor said my chances of surviving were 35-50%. I asked about potential side effects if I lived, and he mentioned speech issues due to the location of the aneurysm. I wished they had told me this before my presidential campaign to avoid complications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I, I had 2 cranioloneuroysms, and they literally had to take the top of my head off. I mean, you take a saw and they cut your head off and go in to find the artery that is one was leaking, the other that hadn't before it burst. So it's an absolutely true story. I said, what are my chances of getting off this table and being completely normal? He said, well, your chances of living are a lot better.
35 out of a 100 50 out of a 100 make it. I was I might as well be the one. I said, what's the most likely thing that will happen if I, if I live? But what he said, well, the side of the brain that the first artery the first aneurysm is on controls your ability to speak. And I thought, why the hell didn't they tell me this before the 88 campaign?
Could have saved us all a lot of trouble. You know what I mean?
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
In 1989 Joe Biden said we need to hold all drug users accountable, because if they are no drug users there would be no appetite for drugs and there would be no market for them. 🧵 👆 https://t.co/FrcdfLPhiG
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must hold all drug users accountable to align with the president's stance. Without drug users, there would be no demand or market for drugs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the line with what the president is calling for, we have to hold every drug user accountable. Because if there are no, no drug users, there would be no appetite for drugs. There'd be no market for them.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Tom Brokaw Exposes Joe Biden’s Corruption back in 2008 🧵 #BidenThread 👆 https://t.co/YhVITgsxkK
Video Transcript AI Summary
I worked for a company that wanted a bankruptcy bill passed, receiving campaign contributions from them. I opposed a bill Senator Obama supported. I voted against a warning on predatory lending and opposed strengthening bankruptcy protections. My son worked for the company too. It wasn't wrong for him to earn money while I protected their interests because he could've made more elsewhere.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out of law school by a big company here in Delaware that is in the credit card business, MBNA. He got about $100,000 a year as I recall. You received $214,000 in campaign contributions from the company and from its employees. At the same time, you were fighting for a bankruptcy bill that, MBNA really wanted to get passed through the senate, making it much tougher for everyone to file bankruptcy. Senator Obama was opposed to the bill.
Among other things, you couldn't, in fact, claim that you had a problem because of big medical bills. You voted against an amendment that would call for a warning on predatory lending. You also called for, you opposed efforts to strengthen the protection of people in bankruptcy. This has been an issue that you've heard about before. Your son was working for the company at the same time.
In retrospect, wasn't it inappropriate for someone like you in the middle of all this to have your son collecting money from this big credit card company while you were on the floor protecting its interest?
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My son graduated from Yale Law School. The starting salary in Wall Street is a $140,000 a year if he went to lawyer. Options he had. He came home to work for a bank.
Surprise, surprise, number 1.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Joe Biden didn't want black children to go to white schools. 🧵👆 https://t.co/7tPzMzYkXC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the issue of busing is not about north versus south, but rural versus urban. They believe that applying the same standards to urban areas as in rural areas is problematic. Despite criticism, they predict that young black leaders will support their stance against busing, which they view as a bankrupt policy. They emphasize the need for federal courts to determine constitutional violations in school desegregation cases based on specific intent to segregate. The speaker references legal standards for establishing intent, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We keep talking about this thing as being north versus south. That's not the issue. It is rural versus urban, and most of the busing that's taking place to date has taken place in rural areas, whether be administratively ordered or court ordered. Now we're moving into applying the same standards to urban areas, and it is a standard that doesn't make sense. It doesn't apply.
It doesn't hold. We're moving from trying to in this in in in urban areas, we've had integrated facilities but segregated neighborhoods. And in rural areas, we've traditionally had integrated neighborhoods but segregated facilities. And they've applied the same standard and the same test. So this north south thing is not really the issue.
As professor Nathan Glaser at Harvard has indicated, as doctor Armour of the Rand Corporation, as James Coleman, as I just tell 3 days of hearing, 22 days of hearing in judiciary committee on another bill I have beyond this that deals busing. And there is uniform opinion of those who testified that it is not a north south, it's an urban rural question, the distinction. But no matter what your intent, there are going to be those who say it's a it's a segregated thing. It's a it's a question of of race, and that you have set back the movement of desegregation of schools. How would you answer that?
The way I answer that is I predict that the young black leadership of America will overwhelmingly decide with me. I predict that in 1980 80 4, my position will be totally vindicated by the sociologist and by civil rights African you know, I come from that side of the track. That's where I'm from. I was a defense lawyer. I handle civil rights cases.
I sat in on route 40. I mean, I you know, I'm not I'm not from the other side of this, and I happen to think that the one way to ensure that you set the civil rights movement in America further back is to continue to push busing because it's a bankrupt policy. And that's that's that's that's why I think I'll be vindicated. I don't I don't include myself with pro or anti busing forces. I think the only group that can determine whether or not a constitutional violation exists is the federal courts of the United States of America.
No one else has that right. Secondly, a federal court of the United States of America determining a violation of the constitution with regard to school desegregation cases must find that there is a specific intent to segregate before they can order busing. That I abide by. That I legislate by. That I hold by.
And they're they're the standards we should repair to. It's difficult to establish intent, but it's clearly possible. Factually, it can be established. The court has the Supreme Court 8 to 0, 8 to 0, ruled yesterday that they must find that, and you very well know as covering this area as long as you have that there is there are legal standards by which you bring in burdens of proof to establish whether or not there was a specific intent.
@VernonForGA - Vernon Jones
In 1993, racist Joe Biden delivered a hateful speech calling Black men “predators on our streets.” The Democrats tried to erase this clip after he became their Presidential nominee in 2020. RETWEET THIS!
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a need to take action against the individuals who pose a threat to our loved ones, regardless of their background or circumstances. We must address the issue of young people who lack guidance, structure, and conscience due to being born out of wedlock and without proper supervision. If we fail to focus on them now, they may become predators in the future. Society, partly due to neglect, has contributed to the existence of these predators. However, this does not excuse their actions, and we must remove them from society to protect our families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take back the streets. It doesn't matter whether or not the person that is accosting your son or daughter or my son or daughter, my wife, your husband, my mother, your parents, it doesn't matter whether or not they were deprived as a youth, it doesn't matter or not whether or not they had no background that enabled them to have to, become social become socialized into the fabric of society. It doesn't matter whether or not they're the victims of society. The end result is they're about to knock my mother on the head with a lead pipe, shoot my sister, beat up my wife, take on my sons. So I don't wanna ask what made them do this.
They must be taken off the street. That's number 1. There's a consensus on that. Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing because they literally I yield myself 3 more minutes. Because they literally have not been socialized.
They literally have not had an opportunity. We should focus on them now. If we don't, they will or a portion of them will become the predators 15 years from now. And, madam president, we have predators on our streets that society has, in fact, in part because of its neglect, created. Again, it does not mean because we created them that we somehow forgive them or do not take them out of society to protect my family and yours from
reSee.it AI Summary
The Bidens are accused of committing 459 crimes, including selling access to the US government to Chinese intelligence officials, brokering a $9 billion deal for Rosneft, and receiving at least $31 million from Chinese businessmen linked to Chinese intelligence. Hunter Biden's former business partner, Tony Bobulinski, confirmed that China's President Xi Jinping personally approved business meetings between the Biden family and CEFC China Energy. Despite these allegations, the Bidens have not been prosecuted, leading some to question the dual system of justice in the US.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
THREAD: Joe Biden was the architect of the 1994 Crime Bill that sent millions of Americans to prison for doing what his son is doing right here. Why aren't the Bidens being prosecuted for the 459 fully documented crimes found on Hunter's laptop?
@LiberatedCit - 🔴♦️ ULTRA-MAGA Lori 🇺🇸 Patriot♦️🔴
😠💢😡🤯 Joe Biden does not care what kind of people enter our country. Terrorists, Drug Dealers, Murderers, Rapists, and disrespectful POS👇have entered the country and are welcomed by Joe & democrats. Illegal Alien Says F**K The People Of The United States
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses frustration with people in the United States, specifically mentioning Mexico. Speaker 1 asks about school, and Speaker 0 explains they are there for a better life. Speaker 1 asks for Speaker 0's opinion on the United States, and Speaker 0 describes it as beautiful but still racist and envious. They mention incidents of violence against immigrants. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 thinks people in the United States are racist, and Speaker 0 confirms, sharing personal experiences. Speaker 1 asks why Speaker 0 is in the United States, and Speaker 0 explains they have family to take care of them. They advise racists to be careful who they mess with, as they may encounter someone strong. Speaker 0 emphasizes that they respect America and came legally. They acknowledge that sometimes Americans lack respect towards them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vale, verga la gente aquí en Estados Unidos.
Speaker 1: Verga la gente. Verga la gente. Verga la gente. ¿Qué país?
Speaker 0: México.
Speaker 1: ¿México? Ok, ok, ok. ¿Y tú? ¿De la escuela? ¿De la escuela?
Sí. ¿Y por qué me vas aquí?
Speaker 0: Para que pasara una muy viva y viva.
Speaker 1: ¿Ah? Todos nosotros estamos aquí
Speaker 0: para comenzar de bebida. Si somos mexicanos venezolanos, si somos de Guatemala, de Honduras, todos están aquí por el mismo propósito, es por una buena vida diferente. So, no sé importe de cuál país es es la propósito de las dos fotos que estamos ahí.
Speaker 1: ¿Qué es tu opinión de Estados Unidos?
Speaker 0: Bien bonito Estados Unidos. Vale, verga la gente aquí en Estados Unidos.
Speaker 1: Verga la gente. Verga la gente,
Speaker 0: head, todavía es racista, todavía es envidioso, no quiere nosotros. Les mandan mensajes, Diego Riles. Ya mataron a veintidós personas aquí de estudiar el pasto, porque quiere las Inmigrantes. So, América está bien bonito las playas de los Ángeles, las playas de Miami. Oh, y Estados Unidos está bien bonito, pero la gente en Estados Unidos cannes de sus carácter, porque te la van a cambiar a alguien, porque no, y si es, no, yo, va a ser alguien más fuerte.
So, eso es mi opinión Estados Unidos, si quieres, a ver,
Speaker 1: tú piense personas en los Estados Unidos es resista.
Speaker 0: Si si piensa que los personas de aquí de los Estados Unidos, por resulta?
Speaker 1: ¿Sí o no?
Speaker 0: Yo sí, yo ahí me he dado mucha gente que son racistas de Estados Unidos.
Speaker 1: So, ¿por qué por qué voy aquí?
Speaker 0: Porque quiero hacer, porque tengo que que me van a cuidar aquí. Tengo mucha familia que me van a cuidar. So, ponte racistas a ver qué cuentas se con quién se van a meter, se van a meter con alguien, no sabe qué se van a meter. Entonces, sigue la racista y van a meter con alguien que son pesados de Venezuela, de México, a alguien que no sabe. Mira, respetamos América, por eso estamos aquí con los derechos y vinimos legales, porque respetamos americanos.
Ok. Pero a veces nos faltan respecto a nosotros.
@RNCResearch - RNC Research
BIDEN (1989): "We have to hold every drug user accountable — because if there were no drug users, there would be no appetite for drugs!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
To align with the president's agenda, it is important to hold all drug users responsible. Eliminating drug users would eradicate the demand and market for drugs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the line with what the president is calling for, we have to hold every drug user accountable. Because if there are no, no drug users, there would be no appetite for drugs and there'd be no market for them.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
15. Joe Biden was the architect of the 1994 Crime Bill that sent millions of Americans to prison for doing what his son is doing right here. So why aren't the Bidens being prosecuted for the 459 fully documented crimes found on Hunter's laptop?
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you possess a small amount of crack cocaine, you can be sentenced to 5 years in jail without any chance of probation. The government has the power to seize all your belongings, including your car, house, and bank account. It doesn't matter why someone becomes a sociopath; our duty is to isolate them from society. They need to be taken off the streets and kept away from our loved ones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand. 1 quarter of $1. We passed the laws of the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others, a law that says you're caught with that. You go to jail for 5 years. You get no No probation.
You get nothing other than 5 years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice. Under our forfeiture at you. You can the government can take everything you own, everything from your car to your house, your bank You can count not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you just got caught engaging there. You can take everything.
I don't care why they become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families. So I don't wanna Ask what made them do this? They must be taken off the street.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
Senator Joe Biden was the architect of the 1994 Crime Bill that sent millions of Americans to prison for doing what his son is doing right here. Why aren't the Bidens being prosecuted for the 459 crimes documented in @MarcoPolo501c3's Report on the Biden Laptop?
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you possess a small amount of crack cocaine, like a quarter, you will be sentenced to 5 years in jail without probation. The law, passed by Senator Thurman and myself, allows the government to seize all your belongings, including your car, house, and bank account. We believe that sociopaths should be isolated from society, so we don't question their motives. It is our duty to remove them from the streets and keep them away from our loved ones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding to my hand. 1 quarter of $1. We passed the law through the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others. A law that says, you're caught with that. You go to jail for 5 years.
You get no probation. You get nothing other than 5 years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice under our forfeiture statute. You hand. The government can take everything you own, everything from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you just got caught engaging I don't care why they become a sociopath.
We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families. So I don't wanna ask what made them do this. They must be taken off the street.
@kevinnbass - Kevin Bass PhD MS
Just a year and a half ago, 30% of Democrats believed that children should be taken away from unvaccinated parents. Nearly 50% of Democrats believed that the unvaccinated should be sent to camps. This is what a totalitarian ideology looks like.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1993, Senator Joe Biden expressed concerns about urban crime and its perpetrators. He highlighted the issue of children growing up without parents or conscience. Biden emphasized that regardless of the root causes, it is crucial to keep these individuals away from our families. His speech is thought-provoking on multiple levels.
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
1993: Senator Joe Biden talks about urban crime and the people responsible for it Biden warns about a group that is "born out-of-wedlock, without parents, without any conscience developing" He adds that he doesn’t care about the root causes. What matters is that they are "away from my mother, your husband, our families." Listen to the whole speech. Mind-blowing on so many levels.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a need to address the issue of young people who have grown up without proper guidance, structure, or conscience. These individuals, born out of wedlock and lacking supervision, pose a threat to society. It is not important to dwell on the reasons behind their actions, but rather to focus on the fact that they must be removed from the streets. If we fail to address this now, they will become the predators of the future. Society has played a part in creating these individuals, but that does not mean we should excuse their behavior. They are a danger to our families and must be dealt with accordingly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take back to the streets. It doesn't matter whether or not the person that is accosting your son or daughter or my son or daughter, my wife, your husband, my mother, your parents, It doesn't matter whether or not they were deprived as a youth. It doesn't matter or not whether or not they had no background that enabled them to have to, become, social, become socialized into the fabric of society. It doesn't matter whether or not they're the victims of society. The end result is they're about to knock my mother on the head with a lead pipe, shoot my sister, beat up my wife, take on my sons.
So I don't want to ask what made them do this. They must be taken off the street. Lest we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing because they literally, I yield myself 3 more minutes, because they literally have not been socialized, They literally have not had an opportunity. We should focus on them now, not out of a liberal instinct for love, brother, and humanity, although I think that's a good instinct, but for simple pragmatic reasons. If we don't, they will or a portion of them will become the predators 15 years from now.
And madam president, we have predators on our streets that society has in fact in part because of its neglect created. Again, it does not mean because we created them that we somehow forgive them or do not take them out of society to protect my family and yours from them. They are beyond the pale, many of those people.
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Biden believes that children as young as 8 or 10 should have the option of transgender surgery to prevent discrimination. He also expresses concern about the high number of transgender women of color being murdered. The original author finds Biden's statements confusing and questions his logic as the leader of the free world.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Joe Biden Believes 8 & 10 Year Old Children Should Be Allowed To Have Transgender Surgery He explains why: “The idea that an 8 year old child or a 10 year old child decides, you know, I decided I wanna be transgender. That's what I think I'd like to be. It may make my life a lot easier. There should be zero discrimination. And what's happening is too many chan gender women of color are being murdered. They're being murdered. I mean, I think it's up to now 17. Don't hold me to that number, but it's it's it's it's it's higher now. And that's just this year. And so I promise you, there is no reason to suggest that there should be any right denied your daughter or daughters, whichever, 1 or 2. 1. 1, your daughter, that your other daughter has a right to be and do. None.” If you can make sense out of this please let me know. I can neither understand the logic or understand what Joe Biden is saying. This is the leader of the “free” world.
Video Transcript AI Summary
An 8 or 10 year old deciding to be transgender should face no discrimination. Many transgender women of color are being murdered, with the number possibly at 17 this year. Every daughter should have the same rights to be who they are.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The idea that an 8 year old child or a 10 year old child decides, you know, I decided I wanna be transgender. That's what I think I'd like to be. It may make my life a lot easier. There should be zero discrimination. And what's happening is too many transgender women of color are being murdered.
They're being murdered. I mean, I think it's up to now 17. Don't hold me to that number, but it's it's it's it's higher now. Yeah. And that's just this year.
And so I promise you, there is no reason to suggest that there should be any right denied your daughter or daughters, whichever, 1 or 2 1. 1, your daughter, that your other daughter has a right to be and do. None. 0.
@elleonCEOTK - Tarik Johnson
The 1994 Crime Bill…It’s my dealbreaker. When Trump was in political office how many times did you hear him say the “N” word? Let’s get the count for Senator Biden in this clip.
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Biden openly acknowledges and supports the idea of the Great Replacement Theory, stating that the wave of demographic change should not be stopped and that it is something to be proud of. He predicts that less than 50% of Americans will be of White European descent in the future.
@PaulHook_em - Paul Hookem 🇺🇸
Here’s Joe Biden proclaiming the grand "right-wing myth" known as the Great Replacement Theory is not only true….it’s good. “The wave still continues. It’s not going to stop. Nor should we want it to stop.” “As a matter of a fact, I think it’s one of the things we can be most proud of.” “Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be White European stock” They never hid their goals…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Our diverse communities, including Muslims, Africans, Asians, and Hispanics, contribute to America's strength. Immigration continues nonstop, with Caucasian Europeans becoming a minority in 2017, making up less than 50% of the population. This shift is seen as a positive source of strength.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not only our Muslim communities, but African communities, Asian communities, Hispanic communities. And and the wave still continues. It's not gonna stop nor should we want it to stop. As a matter of fact, it's one of the things I think we can be most proud of. So, so there's a second thing in that black box.
An unrelenting stream of immigration. Non stop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority.
Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a that's a source of our strength.
@mazemoore - MAZE
2007. Joe Biden says that illegal immigrants turn sanctuary cities into dumps and that he wouldn’t allow it if elected President. Such hateful rhetoric!! 😂 https://t.co/ACfuhKH7AU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if cities should be allowed to ignore federal law regarding reporting illegal immigrants and provide sanctuary.
Speaker 1 claims cities ignore federal law due to lack of federal funding for enforcement. They cite a city that imposed similar sanctions, resulting in economic decline with stores closing, leading to a policy change. The speaker asserts the federal government has been derelict in not funding the requirements needed to enforce existing law.
The speaker asks Biden if he would allow cities to ignore federal law. Biden answers, "No."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and, in fact, provide sanctuary to these immigrants?
Speaker 1: The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need. Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed the similar sanctions. And what they found out is as a consequence of that, their city went in the dumps in in the dumpsters. Stores started closing.
Everything started to happen, and they changed the policy. Part of the problem is you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements that they needed even to enforce the existing law.
Speaker 0: Biden, yes or no, would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law? No. You okay.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
Joe Biden authored the 1994 Crime Bill, which imprisoned millions of Americans for doing what his son is doing right here. @MarcoPolo501c3's Report on the Biden Laptop details 459 crimes involving the Biden family and their associates. Rules for thee, but not for me.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Possession of a small amount of crack cocaine, equivalent to a quarter, results in a mandatory 5-year prison sentence with no option for probation. Judges have no discretion in these cases. Additionally, under forfeiture laws, the government can seize all assets, including cars, houses, and bank accounts, beyond just the proceeds from the drug transaction. The focus is on removing individuals from society to protect families and communities, regardless of the reasons behind their actions. The priority is to ensure they are incarcerated and kept away from the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand, 1 quarter of $1, we passed the law through the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others, a law that says you're caught with that, you go to jail for 5 years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than 5 years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice. Under our forfeiture statutes, you can, the government can take everything you own, everything from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you've just got caught engaging in.
They can take everything. I don't care why they become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families. So I don't wanna ask what made them do this.
They must be taken off the street.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
There is no excuse. Please post the list of people who opposed this law and want to keep illegals who are convicted sex offenders in America. They all need to be voted out of office. Every one of them.
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🇺🇸WHY DID 158 DEMOCRATS VOTE TO KEEP SEX OFFENDERS IN THE U.S.? In September 2024, the House passed a bill to deport undocumented immigrants convicted of sex crimes. Every single Republican and 51 Democrats voted in favor. Shockingly, 158 Democrats opposed it. The bill targeted rapists, pedophiles, domestic abusers, and stalkers, ensuring they couldn’t stay in the U.S. Opponents claimed it "demonized immigrants," but how does protecting convicted predators help anyone—especially their victims? Deporting violent offenders isn’t “fearmongering”—it’s basic public safety. Why would anyone vote to keep criminals who prey on women and children? Source: Newsweek, C-SPAN
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that under the Biden administration, little girls trafficked across the border were found with birth control pills due to multiple rapes during their journey. I believe the administration took steps to keep this information from the public.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Under the Biden administration, little girls trafficked across the border were found "loaded up with birth control pills," given to them because they were r*ped multiple times throughout their journey. “The Biden administration did everything they could to make sure you did not know anything about the children.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alcatraz isn't more secure than our border. The Biden administration hid information about the 300,000 missing children crossing the border. These children endured horrific experiences, including rape. Many were given birth control pills by their parents anticipating this abuse. Lieutenant Oliveras of the Texas Department of Public Safety has been instrumental in bringing this to light. He's a father, and the images broke his heart. He wanted—and through us—America to know what's happening. We're the only network showing these photos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'm telling you, Alcatraz is not more protected than, you know, this. I mean, prisons are not more protected than this. The Biden administration did everything they could to make sure you did not know anything about the children that were coming across the border, the 300,000 that were missing, that remain missing, and the horrors that they that they went through. Rapes, you know, little girls loaded up with birth control pills because the parents who sent them on this journey alone know that they're going to be raped, the number of of of of tragedies that happened to them. And one of the people that has been, I think, a real hero in this, first of all, the group, the Texas Department of Public Safety, the DPS, but specifically, lieutenant Oliveras, who has made it because he's a father and these images have broken his heart and he wanted America to know, he has made sure to let us know and show the photos.
We're the only network that's showing them, basically.
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
Fmr. ACIP Chair Dr. Carol Baker in 2016: “I have the solution ... We'll just get rid of all the whites in the United States ... Guess who wants to get vaccinated the most? Immigrants ... We need not lose the big picture.” https://t.co/vT7rwmje1n
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the fight against vaccine hesitancy is being won at the family, physician, and health center level. They are focusing on strategies against vaccine refusers, not those with mere hesitancy.
The speaker suggests that the U.S. could eliminate its white population to improve vaccination rates, citing Houston's diversity as a model. They claim Hispanics are a political designation, not a race or ethnicity, and that immigrants are the most willing to get vaccinated, contrasting this with Donald Trump's comments about immigrants bringing disease. The speaker asserts that vaccination rates are better in Mexico and that the well-educated in the U.S. are more hesitant, urging a focus on the "big picture."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The battle is being fought. One family, one physician, one health center. That's why we're doing as well as we are. We're talking about the minority and strategies against the minority. So I have the solution.
Every study published in the last five years, when you look at vaccine refusers, I'm not talking about, well, hesitance, most of them we can talk into coming to terms, but refusers. We will just get rid of all the whites in The United States because Houston is the most diverse city in the entire United States. There are seven Asian languages spoken in that city. I have been a minority for more than twenty years in the city of Houston and the majority is we call Hispanic, that is not a race or an ethnicity, that is a political designation. But a lot of them are from Central, South America, Mexico.
Guess who wants to get vaccinated the most? Immigrants. Part of That's what made Donald Trump's comment about bringing disease rules to funding. Are risk when they come here. Immigrants.
And better vaccination rates in Mexico. It is the well educated in terms of pieces of paper that they put on their wall. People that have been here a long time, and it's very unfortunate, and but I think we need not lose the big picture.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
Joe Biden wrote the 1994 Crime Bill that locked up millions of Americans for doing what his son is doing right here. @MarcoPolo501c3's Report on the Biden Laptop documents 459 crimes involving the Biden family and their associates. One set of laws for us. None for them.
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you have a piece of crack cocaine no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand, you’re caught with that, you go to jail for five years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than five years in jail. Under our forfeiture statutes, you can, the government can, take everything you own, every thing from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you've just got caught engaging in. They can take everything. I don't care why they become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. So I don't wanna ask, what made them do this? They must be taken off the street.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have a piece of crack cocaine no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand, 1 quarter of $1, we passed a law through the leadership of Senator Senator Thurman and myself and others, a law that says, you're caught with that, you go to jail for five years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than five years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice. Under our forfeiture statutes, you can, the government can, take everything you own, every thing from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you've just got caught engaging in.
They can take everything. I don't care why they become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families. So I don't wanna ask, what made them do this?
They must be taken off the street.
@dznutzurface - Richie Franklin
If it’s clear our law enforcement won’t protect our children from these foreign terrorists and child predators, I guess we’ll just have to start disappearing them on our own.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Yup
@mazemoore - MAZE
2007. Joe Biden: I would not allow sanctuary cities. They turn into dumps. Enforce federal immigration law.https://t.co/ACfuhKH7AU
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and in fact provide sanctuary to these immigrants?"
"The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need."
"Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed a similar sanctions."
"And what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in the dumps in in the dumpster. Stores started closing."
"Everything started to happen, and they changed the policy."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and in fact provide sanctuary to these immigrants?
Speaker 1: The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need. Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed a similar sanctions. And what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in the dumps in in the dumpster. Stores started closing.
Everything started to happen, and they changed the policy. Part of the problem is you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements that are needed even to enforce the existing law.
Speaker 0: Biden, yes or no? Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law? No. You okay.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that new, chilling video shows the Loop Puncher attack on Kathleen Miles in Chicago, two months ago. The footage, over 10 minutes, captures William Livingston punching Miles as she walks with a friend, then calmly watching as bystanders help. Miles suffered facial fractures, a black eye, and a concussion. Livingston, with a long record, has repeatedly been released due to lenient policies and activist judges, enabling reoffense against women.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
🚨NEW: Just-released chilling video footage—previously withheld from the public by Chicago officials—shows the brutal “Loop Puncher” attack on an Illinois mother that took place two months ago. The video captures Kathleen Miles walking home from work with a friend when she is randomly assaulted by William Livingston, a career criminal with more than a dozen prior arrests since 2012 for battery and aggravated assault. Livingston can be seen running, placing himself between two women and punching Miles without warning, knocking her to the ground. Disturbingly, he remained at the scene, casually watching her lie unconscious in the street as bystanders rushed to help. The footage, which lasts over 10 minutes, shows Livingston calmly observing the aftermath of his attack. Miles sustained multiple facial fractures, a black eye, and a concussion. Records show that Livingston has a long history of similar violent attacks. Despite repeated arrests, he has benefited from progressive policies that downgraded felony charges to misdemeanors and from lenient rulings by activist judges—allowing him to be released time and time again to reoffend, targeting women.
@DOGE__news - (news) DOGE
Chuck Schumer in 1996: "The number one reason people come to the US illegally is to defraud systems like social security and I want to stop it." https://t.co/75NBrQwdNm
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall that in 1995 Clinton received a standing ovation for cracking down on illegal hiring and for barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. He said illegal aliens impose burdens on taxpayers through public services, and that the jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens. He noted we are a nation of immigrants, but also of laws, and that we must do more to stop the abuse.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
In 1995, Bill Clinton got a standing ovation for “cracking down on illegal hiring” and for “barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.” He openly said illegal aliens “imposed burdens on our taxpayers” through public services they used and that the jobs they took “might otherwise be held by citizens.” “All Americans… are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use imposed burdens on our taxpayers.” “We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.” *STANDING OVATION*
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses widespread concern across all Americans about the large numbers of illegal aliens entering the country. It is stated that the jobs these individuals hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants, and that the public services they use impose burdens on taxpayers. In response, the administration is described as having moved aggressively to secure borders, including hiring a record number of new border guards, deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, and barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. The speaker notes that the budget to be presented will aim to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, and to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace, as recommended by the commission headed by former congresswoman Barbara Jordan.
The speaker emphasizes a dual national identity, stating, “We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws.” In this framing, it is asserted that it is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of immigration laws that has been observed in recent years, and a determination is expressed that more must be done to stop it. The overarching message is that while immigration is a fundamental aspect of the nation’s character, maintaining respect for and enforcement of immigration laws is presented as essential to national interests and public order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected, but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former congresswoman Barbara Jordan.
We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Biden's past is being scrutinized as a series of tweets resurface. One tweet references a speech he gave in 1993 where he called Black men "predators on our streets." Another tweet shows a photo of Biden marching in the Civil Rights movement. The tweets highlight the hypocrisy of Biden's past actions and statements.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
This is gold. It would be a shame if it got around.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about avian flu, lack of vaccines, and police officers. They criticize the upcoming debates on gay marriage, a flag amendment, and question the need for a constitutional amendment. They mention the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and state that this law has not been violated or challenged. The speaker questions the purpose of the debates and the motives behind them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Handbasket. We are desperately concerned about the circumstance relating to, avian flu. We don't have enough vaccines. We don't have enough police officers, and we're gonna debate the next 3 weeks, I'm told. Gay marriage, a flag amendment, and God only knows what else.
I can't believe the American people can't see through this. We already have a law. The defensive marriage act. We've all voted, not where I voted, another said, look, marriage is between a man and a woman, and states must respect that. Nobody's violated that law.
There's been no challenge to that law. Why do we need a constitutional amendment? Marriage is between a man and a woman. What's the game going on here? And
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
But wait there's more. Flashback to 2006.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe abortion is not a choice or a right, but rather a tragedy. It should be rare and safe, and our focus should be on reducing the number of abortions. We should strive for a common ground and consensus on how to achieve this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I do not view abortion as a, as a choice and a right. I think it's always a tragedy. And I think that, it should be rare and safe. And I think we should be focusing on how to limit the number of abortions, And there ought to be able to have a common ground and consensus as to do
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
And this one...
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their belief that a nominee should not be required to state their stance on Roe v. Wade, as it could set a precedent that contradicts their own beliefs. They admit uncertainty about the significance of knowing the nominee's position, as they could still support Roe while also supporting restrictions such as wider hallways in abortion facilities. Ultimately, the speaker concludes that knowing the nominee's stance on Roe would not provide much insight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should have to answer how he would rule on Roe. I do not believe he should have to do that because I think that sets a precedent That may very well come back and bite everything I believe in even though I'd like to know how he would rule on Roe. Quite frankly, I'm not sure what it would tell us even if he told us he would sustain Roe. He might sustain Roe and vote for Webster. He might sustain Roe and say, yes.
You can't have an abortion in any facility that doesn't have hallways 14 feet wide. He might, say, sustain Roe and, you know, and so on. So I don't think it would tell us much.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
A man of his convictions.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
And this....
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hunter Biden withdrew from the presidential race due to revelations of plagiarism and embellishments about his academic achievements. He expressed anger and reluctance in making this decision, blaming himself for putting himself in such a position. This incident marks the second time a candidate has been compelled to exit the race due to concerns about their character and integrity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hunter Joseph Biden dropped out of the hunt today saying the disclosures about his plagiarism in law school and his exaggerations about his academic record made it impossible for him to continue.
Speaker 1: I do it with incredible reluctance, and it makes me angry. I'm angry with myself For having been put in the position put myself in the position of having to make this choice.
Speaker 0: The Delaware Democrat is the 2nd candidate to be forced from the race by questions of character and integrity.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Biden Thread
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a visit to Kyiv, the speaker planned to announce a $1 billion loan guarantee. However, they were disappointed when the Ukrainian leaders failed to take action against a state prosecutor as promised. In response, the speaker threatened to withhold the money unless the prosecutor was fired within six hours. Frustrated, the speaker exclaimed, "Oh, son of a bitch."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kyiv and, and I was supposed to announce that there is another $1,000,000,000 loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from, Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor and they didn't. So they said they had, they're walking out to press conference, said, no, I said, I'm not going to, we're not going to give you the $1,000,000,000. They said, you have no authority, you're not the president. The president said, I said, call him.
I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting $1,000,000,000. I said, you're not getting $1,000,000,000, I'm going to be leaving here, I think it was about 6 hours. I look, I said, we're leaving in 6 hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. Oh, son of a bitch.
@FreyjaTarte - Freyja™
Did he say "terminate the presidency"?