reSee.it - Related Post Feed

alexbruesewitz
Posted - April 3, 2023 at 3:51 PM
Saved - April 4, 2023 at 1:23 AM

@alexbruesewitz - Alex Bruesewitz 🇺🇸

RUSH: “They desperately want Trump gone. They want it codified that he can’t run again. They remain scared to death of you and scared to death of Trump.” https://t.co/ThIUL0Tdl7

Video Transcript AI Summary
They desperately want Trump gone and to ensure he can never run again. They fear both Trump and his 75-80 million supporters. Even if Trump leaves, they can't separate his supporters from him or the ideas they stand for. The bond between supporters and Trump cannot be destroyed by making him look bad or embarrassing his followers, as they were there before Trump. The strength of the Make America Great Again movement will continue to be a significant factor in future campaigns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know they desperately want Trump gone, and I I know that they desperately want it codified that Trump cannot run again. Because make no mistake, they remain scared to death of you, and they remain scared to death of Trump. Trump's 75,000,000, 80,000,000 votes, and I'm gonna tell you, you're not going anywhere. Even if Trump does, you're not. They can't separate you from Trump, and more importantly, they can't separate you from the ideas. They can't separate you from MAGA. They can't separate you from Make America Great Again, which I think remains one of our big campaign strength going forward. They believe that they can they can destroy this bond that exists between you and Trump if they somehow make Trump look bad, make Trump look like a reprobate, embarrass you about Trump. They can't do it because you came before Trump.
DerrickEvans_WV
Posted - August 26, 2023 at 10:06 PM
Saved - August 26, 2023 at 11:33 PM

@DerrickEvans_WV - Derrick Evans

A challenge has been filed in federal court to have Donald Trump removed from the 2024 race under the 14th Amendment. They claim Trump cannot legally be on the 2024 ballot because he “engaged in an insurrection. Don’t think it’s possible? Ask @CowboyCouy, they did it to him.

ruckus_media
Posted - August 27, 2023 at 4:12 PM
Saved - August 27, 2023 at 9:06 PM

@ruckus_media - RuckusMedia

BREAKING UPDATE: Legal professionals claim 14th falls outside criminal, impeachment proceedings, and congressional legislation. State election officials need only belief of Insurrection to justify Trump's removal from the ballot! They are in panic mode due to the mugshot response. Listen below:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the possibility of removing Donald Trump from the ballot using the 14th Amendment. They mention that the mugshot of Trump has generated significant support and raised concerns among those who want to remove him. Legal scholars argue that the 14th Amendment can be used independently of criminal proceedings, impeachment, or congressional legislation. Examples are given of individuals in New Mexico and New Hampshire who are working to remove Trump from the ballot. Lawsuits in Florida also aim to remove him. The speaker suggests that the Democrats may be trying to incite anger and unrest to delay the election and maintain power. They urge people to pressure their state election officials to keep Trump on the ballot.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about the 14th amendment as it relates to removing Donald Trump from the ballot. Now I said in a previous video that they would slow roll indictments out desensitize people and eventually enter crescendo to indict Donald Trump on his direction removing from the ballot. I said that because I thought that they would at least try to use some semblance of legitimacy to do it that way they could claim he had due process in his day in court that has since changed and what has been the biggest change? The mugshot. Okay. He's raised over $7,000,000 off that mugshot. He's received massive support from every community. Okay? I think that terrifies them. So now in the last 2 days, I've seen articles saying that the 14th amendment section 3 interaction clause operates independently from criminal proceedings, impeachment proceedings, and congressional legislation. There's been multiple legal scholars saying that is a self executing idea and that you only need the state election officials to believe he committed insurrection and they are legally available to remove him from the ballot. This has already happened in New Mexico coy griffin was removed from the ballot due to insurrection. You have Bryant Messner in New Hampshire who was endorsed by Trump he is coordinating with their secretary of state to remove Trump from the ballot. Now meeting with their secretary of state to remove Trump from the ballot. Now you have lawsuits in Florida saying that they want to remove him from him from the ballot. This is a big deal. Okay? Because what they're saying is, we don't care what you guys think. We're gonna get rid of this guy. And I know a lot of people said well you can't do that he's not being convicted there was no insurrection. If you read the articles and the one that I'm referring to was on abcnews.com and I know people are going to say well that's mainstream media it's fake news but you have to understand something. You look at mainstream media news to figure out what narrative they're going to run with it doesn't necessarily mean that it's true it means that's what they're going to push okay it's like playing 5 card poker with people all right you're sitting across the table from a guy you get your 5 cards you're looking at it it's a decent hand you wanna swap out 2 so you take your 2 give it over he'd hand you 2 back. Meanwhile when he's looking at his cards he starts rummaging through the deck he's picking the cards he wants and then when it comes time to lay them down you've got 2 pair he's got a royal flush right in your face but instead of saying you cheated, you don't say anything, and you watch generate the money to his side of the table. These people threw the rule book in the hobo stove of the shithole run cities. They're making it up as they go along. Okay? You have to understand desperate times call for desperate measures. And when that mugshot came out and they install the support behind Donald Trump they are getting desperate so here's what I think is going to be the new plan for the Democrats because they're having to flex right? Originally I think that they were going to slow roll it and try to make it look legit now I think that they're trying to foment outrage and anger because if he's removed from the ballot in one state it's gonna be chaos. If they coordinate and they remove him from all 50 states there will be absolute mayhem in this country. No one no one will accept an election if they remove Donald Trump from the ballot. I think they know this and I think that what they're trying to do now is stoke enough anger and enough resentment and enough rage to where people break out into civil unrest. They can call martial law, lock people down, blame COVID and blame civil strife. In between COVID and civil strife, they're saying that they're gonna say that the election is too dangerous to be held. Because number 1, people are gonna be exposed to COVID. Number 2, people are so angry that it could foment a civil war so they're gonna delay the election and whoever's in power stays in power. That's what I think the new angle is. Okay? Because they know after the support he received their goose is cooked. K, they know it. So now, desperation. Be wary of it. Understand it. Work with your Secretary of States this is what I was talking about being in the local government and in the state government. It's the Secretaries of State and it's the state election officials that can take him off the ballot with no process whatsoever. You need to pressure your states. You need to pressure your election officials do not allow them to take Donald Trump off the ballot. Call them. Get your numbers. Call them put the pressure on them to where they understand that if they take him off the ballot there's gonna be hell to pay in a peaceful way. You gotta you gotta say that. Alright. Thanks guys.
bberghofsr
Posted - September 2, 2023 at 3:57 AM
Saved - September 2, 2023 at 1:24 PM

@bberghofsr - bberghofsr

This is a judge in one of the Trump cases how the hell is this possible

@earthing5000 - EARTH!🇺🇸

How the hell can she be the judge presiding over Trumps indictment. She needs to step down! This needs to be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court! How can this actually be happening in America?

Video Transcript AI Summary
We will challenge this illegitimate president and focus on Donald Trump. Investigating his finances fuels my determination. As the attorney general, I sue him regularly.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, we're gonna definitely assume we're gonna be a real pain in the ass. I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president. We need to focus on Donald Trump. We need to follow his money. What is fueling my soul right now is Trump. Illegitimate president. I respond to going into the office of attorney general every day, suing him, and then going
WayneTechSPFX
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 3:50 PM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 8:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I attended the ongoing civil fraud trial against Donald Trump in New York, where he faces serious allegations from Attorney General Letitia James regarding financial misrepresentation. The trial has seen various developments, including a limited gag order against Trump for disparaging remarks about court staff. Meanwhile, Trump is also appealing rulings that could affect his eligibility for the 2024 ballot in multiple states. As the legal battles intensify, I remain focused on the implications of these cases for Trump's political future and the broader electoral landscape.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Election interference. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump arrives at New York court for $250 million fraud trial KEY POINTS: The $250 million civil fraud trial that could see Donald Trump permanently banned from doing business in New York has begun. Trump is present in the courtroom in the Manhattan Supreme Court. New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Trump, two of his adult children, the Trump Organization and its top officials of engaging in a yearslong pattern of financial fraud. James alleges the defendants misstated the values of real estate properties by billions of dollars in business records to obtain better loan and insurance terms and tax benefits. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/10/02/trump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16962612835975&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F10%2F02%2Ftrump-fraud-trial-to-kick-off-in-new-york-court.html…

Trump New York fraud trial ends first day with tax accountant testimony New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses Donald Trump, the Trump Organization and others of engaging in business fraud for years. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Election interference. Trump. Fraud trial. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump makes a powerful statement upon leaving the courtroom today. Goes in on corrupt deepstate operative Letitia James

Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge's recent comments indicate that about 80% of the case is likely resolved due to the statute of limitations, particularly regarding transactions before 2014. While it's unusual not to have a jury, the judge's acknowledgment of the statute is appreciated. There are no victims in this case; banks profited and were satisfied with their dealings. This situation is seen as political interference in the 2024 presidential election, taking time away from campaigning. The speaker emphasizes the success of their business, which has grown significantly since 2011, and criticizes the New York Attorney General for focusing on this case instead of addressing violent crime in the state.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think that was very good. That last 5 minutes was outstanding because the judge essentially conceded that the statute of intentions that, we wanted the Court of Appeals is in effect. Therefore, about 80% of the case is over. I was going to come out and say that, as you know, we're not entitled to a jury, which is pretty unusual in the United States of America. So I think it's very unfair that I don't have a jury, but the judge's last statement was very fair. And if I read it right, I'll let perhaps one of the lawyers speak to it. But, good night, you'll speak to it if you would. But, the way I interpret that and the way everyone else in the room seems to interpret that is that the statute of limitations is a very real thing in this country. And that would be about 80% that this case would be over. Could somebody speak to that, please? What what we're talking about? Sure. So based on the judge's comments based on the judge's comments at the end of the year, at end of the trial today, it would appear that he is agreeing that all of the transactions that closed prior to 2014 are now out of the case, which is about 80% of the case. And it's also, something that we want on appeal, but was not accepted by this court but now seems to be accepted by this court. As far as the jury is concerned, it's much different now, I must tell you, than it was 20 minutes ago. We're gonna come out and complain that, you know, in this country, you're entitled to a jury. But we very much appreciate the judge's decision today or his statement today on the statute of limitations, which is a very big thing. It's a limited time period, and we did nothing wrong. And if you look at the statements, they show that even in 2011, I I guess the number was 258,000,000 in cash, very strong company. I don't believe we really I wouldn't do a couple of deals or something, but I wouldn't have even needed to go to banks. Banks loved our business. They loved our deals. They weren't defrauded. They lost no money. They made money. They had the finest attorneys that there are. Frankly, their attorneys were better than my attorneys. And, they made a lot of money, and they considered to be a very good client. I paid them back on time, on schedule. There was no default. It never even sent me a default letter. Not once, for years. Never got a default letter. And there's no case here. There's no victim. The banks aren't a victim. The insurance companies are a victim. Everybody gets paid. It's a terrible, terrible thing. This was for politics. Now it has been very successful for them because they took me off the campaign trail. Because I've been sitting in a courthouse all day long instead of being in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, or a lot of other places I could be at. This is a horrible situation for our country. It's never happened before. It's election interference. They're interfering with the presidential election of 2024, and the people of our country see it. But this was a big, big, I I say surprise, but it was a great credit to the court that the judge was willing to do this. Sort of overruled himself, and I greatly respect that. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. Are you back to us? We may. I mean, I'd love that one. I'd love to be campaigning instead of doing this. Because we built I built a great company. That's one thing people are seeing all the way back to 2011. And today, it's much bigger and much better and even much more liquid. That was $258,000,000 for a real estate development. That's a lot of money. It was in 2011. Today, it's much more than that. Much much more. I built a great company and did great things for New York, and they should respect that. I've employed thousands and thousands of people in New York, and they should respect that. The attorney general of this state is a disgrace. Leticia James is a disgrace. She's a disgrace to our country and to the state of New York. She should focus on all of the violent crime and the murders going on in New York, not on somebody that paid back the banks in full without a default, and in many cases, paid it back early. Thank you very much, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Gag. Judge. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump judge issues limited gag order after former president makes disparaging post about court clerk A New York judge placed a limited gag order on Donald J. Trump on Tuesday after the former president posted a message to social media targeting the judge’s law clerk. Mr. Trump attacked the clerk, Allison Greenfield, shortly before noon on his Truth Social site. His post was a picture of Ms. Greenfield with Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic majority leader. Mr. Trump mocked Ms. Greenfield as “Schumer’s girlfriend” and said that the case against him should be dismissed. The post was taken down during a lunch break, shortly after a closed-door meeting in the room where Mr. Trump is being tried. Justice Arthur F. Engoron explained what had happened after the break, though he did not name Ms. Greenfield or Mr. Trump, referring to him only as a defendant. “Personal attacks on my members of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I will not tolerate them under any circumstances,” he said. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/nyregion/trump-gag-order-fraud-trial.html

Trump Ordered Not to Comment on Judge’s Staff in Fraud Case The former president attacked Justice Arthur F. Engoron’s clerk in a social media post that soon disappeared. He was called to account behind closed doors, then chastised in court as the judge issued a limited “gag order.” nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump returns to New York courtroom as civil fraud trial continues Former President Donald Trump is attending his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday, returning to a Manhattan courtroom for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. Trump, two of his sons, and their company were already found liable for fraud in September in the civil suit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. The trial is proceeding on several other charges, including falsification of business records and conspiracy. Corrupt NY AG Letiticia James made a video yesterday of new developments in the case Trial Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-trial-new-york-court-civil-fraud-charges/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today marked the start of the third week in the trial against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization. Testimony came from two current employees: an assistant vice president and a hotel division executive. The assistant vice president, responsible for Trump's financial statements, confirmed that Allen Weisselberg indicated Trump wanted his net worth inflated. The hotel executive, a certified public accountant, used these financial statements for reporting to Scottish authorities. He stated that Trump had over $290 million in cash equivalents, but later admitted this figure was likely overstated and he wouldn't have reported it had he known it was inaccurate. The defendants have built their business on falsehoods, and as the judge noted, false statements cannot be used in business.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we started the 3rd week of our trial against Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, and other defendants. We mainly heard testimony from 2 current employees at the Trump Organization, an assistant vice president and an executive in the hotels division. The assistant vice president was responsible for preparing Donald Trump's statements of financial condition. These are the fraudulent documents that at the very center of our case. On the stand today, the assistant vice president was asked if defendant Allen Weisselberg ever told him that mister Trump wanted his net worth to go up on his statements. His answer, yes. Our second witness is an executive in the Trump's Hotels division who has a graduate degree in accounting. He's a certified public accountant. And while he did not work on the statements of financial condition, he relied on them to demonstrate Trump's financials to authorities in Scotland for Trump's properties there. One of the main questions was how much liquidity did Trump have. Based on the statements, this witness told authorities that Trump had cash equivalents in excess of $290,000,000. Asked on the stand about it today, the witness admitted that the number he presented to Scottish tax authorities appears to have been overstated and that he probably would not have presented that number to authorities had he known that it wasn't accurate. For years, the defendants built a business on lies and misrepresentations. To quote the judge and the law, you cannot make false statements and use them in business.
Instead of coming face-to-face with Michael Cohen, Trump confronts emails and spreadsheets at New York trial Former President Donald Trump attended his civil fraud trial in New York on Tuesday for the fourth time since the trial began two weeks ago. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud trial. Testify. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump to take the stand momentarily I don't watch the fake news media. So this channel I've been subscribed to since day 1 is streaming the event live. He's a patriot. https://www.youtube.com/live/Yv-x1Y6rphU?si=Pz2aWm9ZwqoqGQ5C

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump co-defendant in GA election case Harrison Floyd refusing plea deal. He wants to focus his case on proving Trump won the 2020 election in Georgia.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. TrIal. Alina. Fraud. NYC. MI intel: #BREAKING Trump attorney and spokesperson Alina Habba officially declares plan to file for MISTRIAL in the corrupt AG Octogon member Letitia James' SHAM trial against President Trump

Video Transcript AI Summary
Former President Trump spoke at a rally, expressing that his indictments are a badge of honor and a tactic to discourage voters. He is currently involved in a civil trial in New York, facing a $250 million lawsuit from Attorney General Leticia James for allegedly misleading banks about asset values. Trump's attorney, Alina Haba, discussed a gag order limiting their ability to speak publicly about the case and mentioned plans to file for a mistrial soon. She asserted that Trump's children, who have testified, were not involved in any wrongdoing. Haba criticized James for pursuing the case, suggesting it was politically motivated and detracting from more pressing issues in the city.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Indictment. Even that stupid trial going on in New York, which has been totally discredited. Everybody's been discredited. That's all comes out of the White House. That's to discourage people from voting. That's to hurt us. The only difference is we have a big voice. But every time I'm indicted, I consider it a great badge of honor because I'm being indicted for youth. Speaker 1: And that is former president Trump speaking at a rally in South Florida on Wednesday night on his ongoing legal issues with president Biden's Department of Justice and Democrat prosecutors. The 45th president currently in the middle of a civil trial in New York in which he and his children and the Trump Organization are being sued by the state's attorney general, Leticia James, for $250,000,000 over accusations that they misled banks and others about the value of their assets. James has been front and center at the trial, appearing in the courtroom and holding news conferences at the end of the day, even as violent crime continues to plague everyday New Yorkers. During James' tenure as AG, crime is up 29% in the Big Apple over a 2 year period. While the city saw a 214% spike in anti Semitic crimes last month amid Israel's war against the Hamas terrorists. Joining me right now in this Sunday morning futures exclusive is president Trump's attorney, Alina Haba. Alina, thanks so much for being here today. Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. Speaker 1: So we just heard from, the AG, Leticia James, talking about this trial. Mhmm. She comes out and talks a lot, but president Trump is not allowed to say anything. Speaker 2: Yeah. We have a gag order currently, against certain issues that we can't speak to, and we've seen this on many cases of his. You know, Jack Smith has moved for the same thing. And it's really, you know, it's a first amendment right. He's also a leading candidate. He has a right to speak. He should speak about anybody and anything that he sees that's corrupt. But we do even I have a limited gag order. Speaker 1: You have been complaining about the judge's clerk, and you say that the judge is is compromised, and the clerk appears compromised. Tell me why. Speaker 2: Well, I actually can't tell you why because I'm gagged. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 2: I can tell you that, you know, we'll be filing papers to address all of those issues. And, the fact that, frankly, Maria, I can't even discuss it with you, and I'm his spokeswoman, I'm his attorney, says a lot about what the judicial system the state of our judicial system right now. Speaker 1: I I think I I did see that there were donations that the clerk had given very supportive to the Democrats. That was one issue. Are you going to file to get a mistrial? Yes. When will you do that? Today? Speaker 2: Soon. Yeah. Very soon. Speaker 1: Okay. And and and how would that change things? Then you go from day 1, you start over again. Speaker 2: You know, the problem is with all of these things, such as filing a motion for recusal, which we've done twice, is that this judge has to be the one that decides, is he going to recuse himself? Does he feel that there was a mistrial? It's a bench trial. We have one judge, and it's the same judge that issued the gag order that has to make those determinations. So at this point, you know, I don't have, any reason to believe he shouldn't after what we've we've learned, if it's true. But I will tell you that it's concerning when he is the arbiter and the decision maker of of some of these issues. Speaker 1: These accusations that he overvalued his assets, what kind of third party people did you have or did Donald Trump have in terms of doing their own evaluation? Because, I mean, when you go to get deals, you have to get auditors to to to okay the valuations that you put in. Right? Right. Did he have auditors to Speaker 2: do that? He had an accounting firm put together what's a compilation. The compilation they were involved with, they were there all the time communicating with the Trump Organization. They put their stamp of approval on it. And then there was this disclaimer that everybody always puts on and says, hey. Do your own work. The disclaimer is very important. Remember, there was nobody harmed. These are sophisticated lenders. Deutsche Bank, you know, major major establishments with all kinds of regulations, KYC, FEC regulations. These people take somebody's numbers. They don't use them. They do their own due diligence, and they weren't harmed. They were paid on time. They were paid with interest. They made money. But Laticia James is putting her nose into private companies and private, individuals' work, which is not what's meant to happen. And the law that she's using is a consumer fraud law so that she can establish some way to have control, to not have a jury, to do certain things in this case that are nonsensical and shouldn't be happening. And we've been fighting it all along the way. The problem we have is the judge is the one that's gonna make those decisions, and he's proven himself to be quite motivated by the other side. Speaker 1: And you think he's compromised as well? Speaker 2: I'm not gonna speak to that, but we'll see. Speaker 1: Yeah. The president's children have testified. Speaker 2: That's right. Speaker 1: Ivanka, Don Junior, and Eric Trump as well. Don Junior speaking again tomorrow. Correct? What have they been asking the kids? And tell me how they fit into all of this. Speaker 2: They don't fit into all of this. What have they been asking the kids is very simple. They'll they'll ask the kids, did you give a value to somebody? Did you do something? And everybody said resoundingly, no. The kids were not involved. I believe that when they crafted this complaint, they looked at their titles and they looked at, frankly, PR. And if you patch in the kids, it's more days that Letitia James can go out there and speak. It's more more press for her, and it's more of an impact. Radical left liberals don't really care about facts. They don't care about law. They care about making statements, and these kids did nothing wrong. They should not be in this case. Ivanka's already out of the case. The boys should not be in the case. Their testimony was direct, and they just wanna make it as if there was some sort of corruption and some sort of conspiracy. There was none. There was an accounting firm. There were lawyers, and there were sophisticated lenders that all did their job, and nobody got harmed. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: But miss James wanted a headline. She campaigned on this, remember, before she was even the attorney general. That's how she got the attorney general role. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: She campaigned on Trump, so she had to follow through. And she should really dismiss this case. It's a little bad, frankly, and the city needs her attention elsewhere. Speaker 1: Alina, we're gonna be waiting and watching for your filings for a mistrial likely later today. Thank you for being here. Speaker 2: Thank you for having me.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Georgia. Election interference. Plea deals. Cabal intel: #BREAKING 4 days ago, Reverend Stephen Cliffgard Lee, one of 18 Trump's co-defendants, declared that he is not ACCEPTING a plea deal in the case initiated by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. "I am not going to plead out to a lie." "I'm not going to cooperate with evil. This is bigger than me." Now, this is how you stand up to cabal! Not like the other deepstate cabal traitors! He faces 5yrs in prison if convicted. I hope he has a legal donation fund setup! Instead of donating to these deepstate cabal Republicans who don't do a damn thing but talk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee from Orland Park, charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results, announced he will not accept a plea deal. At a fundraiser for his legal fees, he stated he refuses to cooperate with what he calls "evil," unlike others who have taken plea deals for lighter sentences. If convicted, he faces a minimum of five years in a Georgia state prison.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And died along with former president Donald Trump in Georgia's election tampering case. He says he will not take a plea deal. Reverend Steven Glyphgard Lee of Orland Park charged with conspiring to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. Chicago Tribune reports at a fundraiser for his legal fees last night, Lee says he'd not take a plea as others have done resulting in less severe penalties. He says, quote, I'm not going to cooperate with evil. He says if convicted, he faces a minimum of 5 years in a Georgia state prison.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election fraud. Ballots. Georgia. MI intel: #BREAKING 3600 duplicate Ballots of the 2020 election found in Fulton County #FultonCounty | #Georgia Trump delivered the news via Truth Social. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Law-fare. Octogon. Alina. MI intel: #VIDEO Alina Habba goes on a truth diatribe stating that Trump has already sued and won members of the cabal, including Hillary, members of the FBI, etc.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I won a court case against President Trump six months ago, which many may not know. The media, which I refer to as fake news, often misrepresents the truth. Trump has sued various parties, including Hillary Clinton and members of the FBI, over the Russia investigation. Despite being impeached twice, he remains resilient. Now, with multiple indictments, I’m focused on how to respond to the next one. The media aims to instill fear and distract supporters, but we are doing well. The current battle is not just political but legal, and it’s crucial to recognize that we are still in a strong position.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Who here knows that president Trump and I beat him in court 6 months ago when he sued him? You didn't know that either, did you? So I'm here to send you one very loud message. What the fake news covers and by the way, the fake news is everyone. Okay? Just because I go on Fox, just because I go on those stations, doesn't mean they're pro Trump. They're pro ratings. So let's be clear. Those are 2 big cases. You had no idea that President Trump sued Hillary Clinton. You had no idea that he sued members of the FBI. He sued everyone that came after him for Russia hoax. He was impeached once. They made it stronger. Impeached twice, he stayed. He was fine. And now we got how many indictments? I'm losing count. But you know what I care about more? What am I gonna say when we go to indictment number 4? It's fine. Bring it. Bring it. End of the day, here's the truth. The wins, they won't tell you because they want you to be scared. They want you to be worried that you're backing people that have no shot, and they wanna distract you. They give you clips. They give you sound bites, but I'm there. And unfortunately for president Trump, it's a sad day when he has to make his lawyer his spokesperson. But that is what the war is now. It's no longer warfare. It's lawfare. That's what we're dealing with. So let me just make sure you all understand something very clearly. We're doing well.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. J6. Fraud. Courts. Appeal. SC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid his appeal to dismiss Judge Chutkan put a pause on Trump's case until the Supreme Court decides whether to weigh in The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court, and put a pause on the case against the Republican 2024 frontrunner until the high court determines its involvement. Special Counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether Trump can be prosecuted on charges relating to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump said he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., to reverse that outcome. Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court — the usual next step in the process — and have the Supreme Court take up the matter directly. Late Monday, the Supreme Court asked Trump’s lawyers to respond to the special counsel's motion by Wednesday, Dec. 20 — two days later than Smith had requested. Lawyers for Trump filed a motion Tuesday urging Judge Tanya Chutkan to pause proceedings against Trump in the Jan. 6 case while his appeal is pending. The trial was set to begin March 4, but now that start date could be delayed. Chutkan said that she would reconsider the trial date at the completion of the appeals process. Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-pauses-jan-6-case-against-trump-amid-former-presidents-appeal-dismiss

Judge pauses Jan. 6 case against Trump amid former president's appeal to dismiss The judge presiding over the case against former President Donald Trump and his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election acknowledged she does not have jurisdiction over the matter while it is pending before the Supreme Court. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy Giuliani. Lawsuit. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case Ruby Freeman and her daughter, Wandrea “Shaye” Moss, asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani’s defamatory statements about them following the 2020 election. What to know about Rudy Giuliani’s defamation trial: •The jury delivered its verdict Friday afternoon in Rudy Giuliani's civil defamation trial related to false claims he made about two former election workers in Georgia. •Jurors awarded the plaintiffs Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss $148.17 million total in damages. •Freeman and Moss asked for at least $24 million each for Giuliani's defamatory statements about them following the 2020 presidential contest when he baselessly accused them of election fraud. U.S. District Judge •Beryl Howell, who is overseeing the trial, ruled this year that Giuliani defamed the two women with his remarks. •Trial testimony this week lasted four days. Giuliani reversed course yesterday and said he would not take the stand in his defense, despite saying earlier that his testimony would make "definitively clear" that what he said about Freeman and Moss "was true." •The jury began deliberating yesterday afternoon following closing arguments in the case. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/live-blog/rcna129882?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17026806140030&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Flive-blog%2Frudy-giuliani-trial-verdict-defamation-live-updates-rcna129882

Rudy Giuliani to pay $148 million in Georgia election worker defamation case: Recap Latest news and updates as a jury deliberates on the damages Giuliani will face for defaming two Georgia election workers following the 2020 election. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#AMERICAUNDERATTACK Trump. Election interference. Colorado. President. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former President Donald Trump can not appear on the state's ballots for the 2024 election due to his incitement of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, reversing a lower court ruling. But the state Supreme Court stayed its ruling from taking effect until Jan. 4, "subject to further appellate proceedings." The cabal is setting the stage for the steal. Source: https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/12/19/trump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17030279636160&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnbc.com%2F2023%2F12%2F19%2Ftrump-ballot-challenge-decided-by-colorado-supreme-court.html

Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from 2024 ballot, pauses ruling to allow appeal The Colorado court ruling barring Donald Trump from ballots in the state is the first time a court has rule he is disqualified for engaging in insurrection. www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Trump team issued a statement on the Colorado decision

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election. Fraud. Rudy. Bankruptcy. Lawsuits. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million. Rudy files chapter 11 bankruptcy U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. Former Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss can immediately seek enforcement of their $146 million financial judgment against Rudy Giuliani because there is good reason to assume he will not comply, a federal judge ruled Wednesday. “Giuliani’s failure to ‘satisfy even more modest monetary awards entered earlier in this case,’ provides good cause to believe that he will seek to dissipate or conceal his assets during the 30-day period,” U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell wrote in her order. Developing... Source: https://www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna130719?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_ct=1703179669900&_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17031796416523&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nbcnews.com%2Fpolitics%2Fdonald-trump%2Fjudge-orders-rudy-giuliani-start-paying-georgia-election-workers-146-m-rcna130719

Judge orders Rudy Giuliani to start paying Georgia election workers $146 million U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell lifted a 30-day pause on collecting the judgment because of the plaintiffs' concerns he'd try to hide his assets. www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, lists $500M in debts after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. Giuliani, who was once hailed as “America’s Mayor,” listed debts of up to $500 million with assets of only $10 million in the filing, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday. I've repeatedly stated that they're setting up the steal again. Look around. The Dominion systems will still be in use. They've convicted a good portion of the J6ers. They've indicted Trump with election fraud. They've indicted those supposedly who were close to him, and many of those pled guilty and will testify against him. They've taken Trump off the ballot in Colorado pending appeal, with more states to follow. Do you get it yet? Source: https://nypost.com/2023/12/21/news/rudy-giuliani-files-for-bankruptcy-in-ny/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social

Rudy Giuliani files for bankruptcy in NY, owes up to $500M after devastating $148M loss in election fraud case Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy in the wake of a $148 million civil court ruling and a mountain of unpaid legal bills. nypost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Election interference. Michigan. SC. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The Michigan Supreme Court has declined to hear a case arguing that former President Donald Trump should be excluded from the state's primary ballot, meaning the frontrunner for the GOP nomination will remain a listed candidate. The order issued Wednesday is in line with lower court rulings in Michigan, though at odds with a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court. Source: https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2023/12/27/michigan-supreme-court-trump-stays-primary-ballot/72037140007/

Michigan Supreme Court keeps Trump on ballot; rejects insurrectionist argument The argument over whether Trump is an eligible candidate center around whether his conduct around the 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol was insurrection. freep.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Escalation. Trump. Election interference. Ballots. Maine. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Resubscribe POLITICS Biden administration The Fix The 202s Polling Democracy in America Election 2024 DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state By Patrick Marley Updated December 29, 2023 at 1:29 a.m. EST|Published December 28, 2023 at 6:58 p.m. EST Maine on Dec. 28 became the second state to ban former president Donald Trump from its primary ballot due to his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Maine barred Donald Trump from the primary ballot Thursday, becoming the second state to block the former president from running again because of his actions before and during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The decision by Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows (D) is sure to be appealed. The Colorado Supreme Court last week found Trump could not appear on the ballot in that state under a part of the U.S. Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. The Colorado Republican Party has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case, which could resolve for all states whether Trump can run again. Both states have temporarily paused their decisions so Trump can pursue appeals. Developing... Keep a close eye on the Supreme Court. Hopefully, the global cabal blackmail group doesn't get to them. Based on their decision. We'll either know they're working with military intelligence[MI] or not. I was always taught. Hope for the best. Expect the worst. I don't trust anyone working in these cabal controlled institutions. There's a reason why the dems chose state Sen. Shenna Bellows as their new Secretary of State in Maine. She was the first-ever ranked-choice vote as the first woman to hold the position. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/28/maine-trump-primary-ballot/

Donald Trump removed from Maine primary ballot by secretary of state Maine is the second state to block the former president from running again under a part of the Constitution that prevents insurrectionists from holding office. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Republican. Deepstate. Trump. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Vivek Ramaswamy believes the Republican establishment is rooting for Trump to be forcibly removed from the ballot so they can prop up their chosen candidate. He stated that any state Trump is being removed from that the republican contenders for president should also remove their names from the ballot. If they don't, they are in on it, too. Lately, Vivek has been on a roll releasing comms. As I've been saying for this past year. The proof is in the pudding. Dominion, through actionable court proceedings, won their lawsuit against FOX, and many others stated that their voting machines were good. Courts agreed. Thus, they will continue to use the same systems. In the election fraud case in Georgia, many of the Trump team loyalists have pleaded guilty and decided to testify against Trump. That case and several others against Trump are coming up in a few short months. The precedent for those cases rests in the current Georgia case. I have a feeling that Trump will provide irrefutable evidence at these trials proving his innocence. Now, if the jury/judge decides to convict anyway, this will be another stolen election. I'm praying that it won't. But I am prepared if it does. So should you. Vivek is telling you right here:

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot, I will also withdraw my candidacy and challenge Chris Christie, Nikki Haley, and Ron DeSantis to do the same. If all Republicans in Maine step back, it will halt the interference in our GOP primary. Their refusal to act suggests a deeper issue, revealing a faction within the Republican establishment that supports this outcome as much as the Democrats do. We need to recognize this troubling game. I'm concerned that this is just the beginning of their plans for 2024. The system is determined to eliminate Trump from the election, as seen in recent events in Colorado and Maine. We should be worried about what lies ahead for our country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Any state where Donald Trump is forcibly removed from the ballot in this way, I'll also remove myself. And I challenge Chris Christie and Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis to do the same thing, or else they're also complicit. If every Republican removes themselves from the ballot in Maine, that automatically stops the selection interference in our GOP primary. Now the fact that they're not doing it reveals that there's something deeper going on. This isn't just the Democrats. There's a force within the Republican establishment that's propped up a chosen puppet, and they're actually rooting for this same outcome every bit as much as the Democrats are. And I think it's time we open our eyes to this insidious game that's being played. I'm deeply worried, but I'm worried that I'm right about this. That what we're seeing right now, this isn't the end of the road. This is just the beginning of what they're planning to pull in 2024. And you mark my words on that. This is the a system that has decided by hell or high water at one cost or another, they will eliminate this man from contention in this election. You see that happening Colorado 2 days ago, Maine today. You wait for what's happening in 2024, and I'm worried for this country found it on.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeal. J6. Maine. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. President Donald Trump on Tuesday filed an appeal of the decision by Maine’s top election official that he is ineligible to appear on the state’s primary ballot. “[T]he Secretary’s Ruling was the product of a process infected by bias and pervasive lack of due process; is arbitrary, capricious, and characterized by abuse of discretion,” Trump's attorneys wrote in the appeal. Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, ruled last week that the former president is constitutionally barred from appearing on the state’s primary ballot, citing his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. But Bellows’ office said her decision would not be enforced until the courts weigh in. Maine’s Republican primary is March 5. In her 34-page decision, Bellows wrote that Trump’s conduct around the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol compelled her to rule him ineligible. “The weight of the evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump was aware of the tinder laid by his multi-month effort to delegitimize a democratic election, and then chose to light a match,” she wrote, adding that he “used a false narrative of election fraud to inflame his supporters and direct them to the Capitol to prevent certification of the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power.” In an interview with NBC News last month, Bellows said her preference would have been to wait for the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on the matter, which centers on the 14th Amendment, but she believed Maine law required her to act now. “The country would be well served if the United States Supreme Court issues clear guidance on this unprecedented constitutional question for all to follow,” Bellows said. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-challenge-maine-ruling-2024-primary-ballot-appeal-rcna131761

Trump appeals Maine ruling that he's ineligible for 2024 primary ballot Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows found that Trump is ineligible for the state’s Republican primary ballot due to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Election interference. Fraud trial. NYC. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trump makes closing arguments at the conclusion of the fraud case in New York City. No jury. Only a judge will render the verdict in the case. Hopefully, by the end of business day today, or tmr morning. 1 down. 3 cases to go. Video credit: wehaveitall

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've faced years of politically motivated attacks from the New York Attorney General, who campaigned on targeting me. Despite millions of pages of documents and extensive litigation, they lack evidence against us. The only witness they have is a convicted felon who has recanted his statements. We've already won in the Court of Appeals, but the judge has been slow to acknowledge that. This case is unprecedented, using a consumer fraud statute inappropriately, and feels like a witch hunt and election interference. Despite these challenges, our poll numbers are strong, and the American people understand the situation. Thank you for your support.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Yeah. We've gone through years with, this person. She's a political hack, the attorney general. The judge is obviously extremely friendly with the group, and we'll see, what happens. I think maybe, they surprise people on a positive side. We'll have to see what happens exactly. But, we've proven this case so conclusively. We've asked for directed verdict many times. They don't have any facts. They don't have any evidence against us. Millions and millions of pages, years of litigation, and all politically motivated. She campaigned on a I will get Trump. If you've ever seen any of the, seen any of her clips, they're horrible clips, actually, the anger. She's got serious drug derangement syndrome. There's no question about Leticia James, the corrupt attorney general of New York. So we've proven our case. Is not one witness against us other than one person who is a, deranged. He's got a lot of problems. He's a man who's been convicted of lying. He's a felon convicted felon and, not a good person, but that's their only witness, and he's now crashed and burned. They have no witnesses. And, by the way, that witness took back everything that he said. He took back everything he said in court. Took it all back. So they have no case. It's a shame that a thing like this is able to happen. Businesses leave New York. She went after Exxon, and they decided to move to Texas. And, 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars they pay in taxes. I paid over $300,000,000 of taxes over the last number of years. 300,000,000 and, they don't recognize that. They don't recognize anything. So not think of it. Not one witness, millions of pages of document, years of this nonsense, and now it goes on. And one other factor, we won this case already in the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals voted in favor of us, but this judge has been very, very slow to accept that opinion because that's not the opinion that he wants. But we won in the Court of Appeals. That's the boss of this judge who has to know that. And there was a conclusive victory, statute of limitations and other things, and that case has already been won. So that's the story, and I thought we'd come down to 40 Wall Street, which is a great building, and you'd get a chance to see one of the nicest buildings in New York at a convenient place. And I don't have to pay any rent because we have it and it's been a very successful building. But it's a shame to have to have gone through this for years years years. And now we'll see if we're gonna get an honest verdict. We didn't have a jury. We had no rights to a jury. It's a statute that's never been used before for a purpose like this. I just watched a certain broadcast and they said, you know, they've been looking. Has it ever been used before? This is a statute that's a consumer fraud statute. Never been used for anything like this before, and it's a shame. It's, it's really a, it's a witch hunt in the truest sense of the word. It's election interference. And, it just came out. I just it was just right now, Leticia James visited Joe Biden in the White House numerous times during the Trump witch hunt, and this just came out about 10 minutes ago. I got it. And so it's all it's all a conspiracy to try and get Biden who can't put 2 sentences together trying to get him into office. So I just wanna let you know that, we have our best poll numbers. We have the best everything despite this, and maybe because of this. Because the people of the United States, all of those people back there, but the people of the United States really get it. They get it better than anybody else. Yeah. Please. Right. President Trump, everybody.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Charges. Ballots. Supreme Court. Election intel: #BREAKING TRUMP TO SC: "All presidents must have complete & total presidential immunity, or the authority & decisiveness of a President of the United States will be stripped & gone forever. Hopefully, this will be an easy decision. God bless the Supreme Court!"

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

RNC. Resolution. Haley. Trump. Election intel: #BREAKING RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. The Republican National Committee (RNC) is reviewing a draft resolution that, if approved, would declare Donald Trump the party’s presumptive 2024 presidential nominee even as Nikki Haley continues to wage a vigorous campaign against the former president and frontrunner. The draft resolution, obtained by The Dispatch Thursday morning, was proposed by David Bossie, an RNC committeeman from Maryland and close Trump ally. His effort to put the national party on a general election footing behind Trump follows RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel saying after the former president defeated Haley in Tuesday’s New Hampshire primary that it was time for Republicans to unite behind the frontrunner and focus on defeating Joe Bidan. “RESOLVED that the Republican National Committee hereby declares President Trump as our presumptive 2024 nominee for the office of President of the United States and from this moment forward moves into full general election mode welcoming supporters of all candidates as valued members of Team Trump 2024,” reads a key portion of the draft resolution. Under current RNC rules, Trump still has to win the requisite number of nominating convention delegates—1,215—to become the party’s unchallenged presumptive nominee. After the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, Trump leads Haley in the race for delegates 32 to 17. But passage of this resolution, possibly next week at the RNC winter meeting in Las Vegas, could begin a preemptive process of the national party working with the former president as if he had already done so. And under RNC rules, that is permissible. This resolution, even in draft form, also functions as another sign that the GOP establishment is anxious to coalesce behind Trump and put an end to a presidential primary that, after his victories in Iowa and New Hampshire, the former president looks poised to win. Developing... Source: https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-politics/rnc-moving-to-declare-trump-its-presumptive-nominee/

RNC Moving to Declare Trump Its Presumptive Nominee An RNC committeeman has submitted the proposal despite Nikki Haley’s vow to stay in the race. - Start a free trial today for full access. thedispatch.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Lawsuit. Trials. Jury. COMMS. Defamation. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury just ruled that Donald Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages The nine-person jury began deliberations in federal court in New York at 1:40 p.m. ET and reached a verdict in just under three hours. The award included $11 million for damage to Carroll's reputation, $7.3 million for emotional harm and other damages, and $65 million in punitive damages. The decision came after contentious closing arguments that saw Trump storm out of the courtroom. He returned for his own attorney's closing arguments but left the courthouse at 4 p.m. before the jury returned its verdict. He posted about it on his social media platform on Truth Social a short time later. "Absolutely ridiculous!" he wrote, adding he would be appealing. "They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!" Carroll did not comment as she left the courthouse. The cabal has done this to use as Cannon fodder to try and use against him this election. They all need talking points, including Haley. This is also comms to let other juries know how to proceed in Trump’s other upcoming trials this year. As I've stated countless times concerning Trump’s trials. He's going to present all of the evidence in the world that can't be refuted. One of 2 things will happen. Out of all of the scenarios, the world will learn the truth about the election and J6, etc. First scenario. He'll get convicted anyway despite showing all of the evidence. That'll be the 1st marker for MI. Sparking what is to come. 2nd scenario, he's found innocent and vindicated of everything. Then Cabal goes into survival mode. All ops will get escalated globally, sparking the 2nd marker. Both scenarios will spark ops. Get ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/verdict-reached-e-jean-carrolls-defamation-damages-trial-trump-rcna135919

Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in defamation damages, jury finds Former President Donald Trump must pay writer E. Jean Carroll over $83 million in damages for repeatedly defaming her, a jury found Friday. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. E. Jean Carroll. Epstein. Theater. Actors. COMMS. Cabal intel: #REPORT E. Jean Carroll named the mice that runs around her blue & white striped house that she named the 'Mouse House. She also has a dog named “Tits,” and paints rocks and trees blue in her backyard that runs by a river. What does her house remind you of? These are comms. These are criminals. They are cabal.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some distinguished mice live here. Kahneman is in the kitchen, and Taborski is in the bedroom. This is my shed, and on the door is a list of my dogs: Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. I was horrified to see the dry streams and rivers, which inspired me to paint the rocks blue to show where the water once flowed. After painting the rocks, I moved on to paint the trees, and soon I had painted the entire forest.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some very distinguished, mice live here. Kahneman lives in the kitchen. Taborski lives in the bedroom. This is my shed. And on that side, the books that most influenced me growing up. On the door of the list of my dogs, Marky, Fortuna De Las Funky, Heidi, Tits, Bloody, and Hepburn. The streams and the rivers were dry, and I it it so horrified me that I came out and started painting the rocks blue to indicate that there was once a river here. And then after I got done painting the rocks, I just sort of walked over here and then did that tree and then did that tree and then I did this tree. And then pretty soon I've done this whole forest. That's because some very distinguished, mice live here.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. IRS. Taxes. Elon. Leaks. MI intel: #BREAKING Ex-IRS Contractor Who Leaked Trump, Griffin Tax Data Gets Five Years in Prison A former Internal Revenue Service contractor who stole and leaked the tax returns of former President Donald Trump, Ken Griffin, Elon Musk, and other billionaires was sentenced to five years in prison. Charles Littlejohn, 38, had pleaded guilty Oct. 12 to stealing Trump’s tax data from the IRS and leaking it to the New York Times. He also admitted taking tax information about thousands of other wealthy Americans, including Jeff Bezos, that he passed to ProPublica. The judge called it the biggest heist in IRS history and “an intolerable attack on our democracy. Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-29/irs-leaker-of-trump-griffin-tax-data-gets-five-years-in-prison?embedded-checkout=true

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Bidan. Carroll. Election intel: #REPORT Carroll: "I'll do everything I can" to help Bidan beat Trump in 2024.” This means she'll lie, cheat, and steal.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The idea is that when you confront Donald Trump, he appears as just a man without power. His influence comes from the people around him who support him. This concept is similar to Hans Christian Andersen's tale, "The Emperor's New Clothes," where the emperor's power is an illusion created by his followers. Currently, Trump is campaigning for president again and polling suggests a tight race. There hasn't been communication from Joe Biden's campaign about facing Trump, but there is a willingness to engage if necessary.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That when you've actually faced the man, he's just a man with no clothes on. Yeah. It's the people around him that are giving him the power. What do you mean by that? Speaker 1: Well, Hans Christian Andersen's great fairy tale, the emperor has no clothes, that is written about Donald Trump. It's just we're the ones who clothe him in all this power. He has none himself. It's his followers. It's his hangers on. In the court, they were strutting back and forth and handing him messages. It was right, Robbie? Miss Scott, Speaker 2: you say it's nothing. You say the emperor has no clothes. The emperor is trying to run for president Yeah. Again. Speaker 1: And And right now is leading. Speaker 2: And right now, the polls suggest it's a coin flip. It's very close. Have you heard from Joe Biden's campaign arm about potentially campaigning against the former president Donald Trump? No. Are you interested in doing so? Speaker 1: Do anything I can. Speaker 2: That's a yes. Speaker 0: What was it? Said that

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Appeals. Judges. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump D.C. trial drops off court’s March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case Administrative move comes as anticipation mounts over how — and when — an appeals court will decide former president’s claim of immunity from criminal prosecution. President Donald Trump’s March 4 trial date on charges of plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election has been dropped from the public calendar of the federal court in Washington, a sign of what has long been anticipated — that his claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution would delay his trial while it remains on appeal. The change did not appear on the official criminal case docket before the U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, who has made clear since Trump filed his appeal on Dec. 7 that all trial deadlines would be suspended while he challenges the case. On appeal, Trump is arguing that the government does not have authority under the Constitution to bring charges against him for actions he took while president after the 2020 election through the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, when he attempted to prevent Congress from confirming Joe Biden’s election victory. A delay in the D.C. case makes it increasingly likely that the first of Trump’s four criminal trials could be held this spring in Manhattan on New York state charges of business fraud in connection with hush money payments during the 2016 election. That trial has nominally been set for March 25, but the court, in that case, has signaled deference to Trump’s federal election subversion case. New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan has scheduled a pretrial hearing in two weeks — Feb. 15 — and is expected to decide after that if the trial will go forward as planned. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/01/trump-trial-calendar-jan-6-delay/

Trump’s D.C. trial removed from March calendar, clearing way for N.Y. case A delay in Trump’s case in D.C. makes it likely that the first of his four criminal trials could be his New York state prosecution accusing him of business fraud. washingtonpost.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. FOIA. DOJ. FBI. Fraud. Ballots. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Brand new FOIA documents just uncovered reveals that the DOJ and FBI uncovered alarming 2020 election ballot fraud in Detroit, Michigan, and covered it up In the emails, a DOJ official says, "This allegation, and accompanying photos, is alarming. I would like FBI to look into this, please." Someone at the Michigan Attorney General's office also responded to the complaint, "Talked to the FBI on this and it's not going to be in their lane or ours in terms of apparent criminal actions, but MDOS[Michigan Department of State] may want to call and try and head this off." Source: yehuda_miller

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Immunity. Federal. Appeals. Courts. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claim that he was immune to charges of plotting to subvert the results of the 2020 election, ruling that he must go to trial on a criminal indictment accusing him of seeking to overturn his loss to President Biden. The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit handed Mr. Trump was a significant defeat, but it was unlikely to be the final word on his claims of executive immunity. Mr. Trump, who is on a path to locking up the Republican presidential nomination, is expected to continue his appeal to the Supreme Court. Still, the panel’s 57-page ruling signaled an important moment in American jurisprudence, answering a question that had never been addressed by an appeals court: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? Trump will file an appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump is now in the cabal playing field. Brace yourselves this year, guys. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/trump-immunity-appeals-court.html

Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity The ruling answered a question that an appeals court had never addressed: Can former presidents escape being held accountable by the criminal justice system for things they did while in office? nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Judge. Rulings. Octigon intel: #BREAKING Judge set to rule in Trump's $370 million civil fraud case A New York state judge is expected to rule on Friday in a $370 million civil fraud case against former U.S. President Donald Trump, who is accused of inflating his net worth to dupe bankers into giving him better loan terms. Justice Arthur Engoron's ruling could deal a major blow to Trump's real estate empire as the businessman turned politician seeks the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the Nov. 5 U.S. election. The lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James accused Trump and his family businesses of overstating his net worth by as much $3.6 billion a year over a decade. Trump has denied wrongdoing and called the case a political vendetta by James, an elected Democrat. In addition to monetary penalties, James is seeking to permanently ban Trump from New York's real estate industry and sharply limit his ability to do business in the state. She is also seeking five-year industry bans for Trump's two adult sons, Don Jr. And Eric, who are also defendants in the case. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/legal/judge-set-rule-trumps-370-million-civil-fraud-case-2024-02-16/#:~:text=Justice%20Arthur%20Engoron's%20ruling%20could,the%20Nov.%205%20U.S.%20election.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Judge orders Trump and his companies to pay more than $350 million in the New York civil case. Bars Trump from running businesses in the city for three years.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Motion. Judge. Carroll. COMMS. Octogon intel: #UPDATE Judge Denies Trump’s Delayed Payment Request In E. Jean Carroll Case The New York judge who oversaw E. Jean Carroll’s defamation lawsuit against former President Donald Trump rejected the former president’s request to delay paying Carroll more than $80 million in damages, according to a Sunday court filing. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, requested an “administrative stay” on Friday to pause Trump’s required payments to Carroll after he made defaming statements against the former writer in 2019. Kaplan said Sunday he would not grant a pause without allowing Carroll and her team to respond and gave them until Thursday at 5 p.m. to respond to Trump’s motion. In Habba’s Friday motion, she asked Kaplan to stay the motion for at least 30 days until Trump’s post-trial motions were resolved, claiming there was a “strong probability” the verdict could be reduced or eliminated on appeal. If they're giving Trump and attorneys a hard time now in just civil suits. Just imagine what they're going to do in the criminal trials. This corrupt 2-tiered justice system is designed to railroad those the cabal wants locked up. It doesn't make a difference how much money a person may have. Sometimes, it does in rare cases. Be prepared for what is to come. https://www.msn.com/en-US/finance/-companies/judge-denies-trumps-delayed-payment-request-in-e-jean-carroll-case/ar-BB1iRzRB?ocid=sapphireappshare

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Interest. Bankrupt. Orders. Civil. COMMS. Octogon intel: #BREAKING $100 MILLION in interest added to Trump's judgment accruing interest at $100k daily In New York, former President Donald Trump's bills are racking up. The judgment in his civil fraud trial was officially entered with the court today — $454,156,783.05 for him alone, plus Trump is now accruing over $100,000 of post-judgment interest each day. This is on top of the recent $83.3 million verdict against him in the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial. Trump and the other defendants in the civil fraud case — his sons Donald Jr. and Eric Trump and two other Trump Organization executives — have 30 days to appeal the decision by Judge Arthur Engoron, which found them liable for fraud for misrepresenting the value of Trump properties. The message is loud and clear. The Octogon intends to bankrupt Trump. Usually, in civil cases. The lawyers tie up litigation on appeals for years. Not in Trump's cases. They want the full amount in 30 days or face hefty interest, fines, penalties, and possible jail time. Next up is Trump's criminal cases. Where he faces decades in prison. Be prepared for what is to come. Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-civil-fraud-judgment-over-450-million-100000-interest-per-day/

Trump's civil fraud judgment is officially over $450 million, and climbing over $100,000 per day The amount former President Donald Trump owes in his New York civil fraud case is $454,156,783 — plus $111,983 of post-judgment interest accruing each day. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Properties. Assets. Seizure. COMMS. Financial. NY. Octogon intel: #REPORT Attorney General Letitia James says she's prepared to seize Trump's assets if he can't pay his $354 million civil fraud fine.

Video Transcript AI Summary
New York Attorney General Letitia James stated that if Trump cannot pay the over $300 million in penalties from his civil fraud trial, they will seek court enforcement to seize his assets. This includes significant properties like 40 Wall Street. Trump will need to post a bond within the next 25 days, which involves cash and rights to some properties. He has the option to appeal the verdict, but ultimately, he must pay whatever amount is determined. If he cannot provide the cash, prosecutors will proceed to seize and liquidate his assets to satisfy the judgment owed to the state of New York.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the New York attorney general Letitia James told ABC News she is going to do if Trump cannot afford to pay the 300,000,000 plus in penalties from his civil fraud trial? Here's what she said. Speaker 1: If he does not have funds, to pay off the judgment, then we will seek, you know, judgment enforcement mechanisms in court. And we will ask the judge to seize his assets. Speaker 0: Those assets include big buildings here in New York City, including, she talked a bit about, 40 Wall Street. Is that what would play out here normally for someone, and do you see this happening? Speaker 2: Yeah. So this is the way it will go, Poppy. First of all, Donald Trump, within the next 25 days or so, is gonna post a bond, meaning some cash element plus the deeds, the rights to some of his properties, including potentially some of those buildings. Then Donald Trump will have the right to appeal, of course. And whatever comes out of that appeal, whatever's left of this verdict, maybe all $350 +1000000, maybe some smaller number, maybe none of it. But whatever comes out of it, Donald Trump then has to pay. This is not negotiable. This will be a judgment owed not to individuals but to the state of New York. And Right. If he cannot put up cash to satisfy that judgment, then the next move that a prosecutor makes is you seize and liquidate assets until you get up to that number.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Appeals. NY. Courts. Patriot intel: #UPDATE Donald Trump appeals $454 million loss in New York real estate fraud case President Donald Trump filed an appeal Monday against the dramatic $454 million court loss he suffered in a New York real estate fraud case. Trump's liability includes penalties of about $355 million plus interest that started running at different times for different Trump properties. Interest will continue accumulating at 9% a year until the judgment is paid under state law. Trump filed the appeal document Monday along with his two oldest sons, former Trump Organization executives, and several business entities. Although Trump didn't lay out his appellate arguments on Monday, legal experts expect he will argue that the fraud he was found liable for didn't involve traditional victims. James made the case that Trump inflated his net worth to get better loan terms, but the lenders themselves haven't sued Trump alleging they were harmed by the inflation. "We trust that the Appellate Division will overturn this egregious fine and take the necessary steps to restore the public faith in New York’s legal system," Trump lawyer Alina Habba said in a statement Monday. I have his appeal pdf file. it's 102pgs long. If his appeal is accepted or rejected. Will set a precedent on how Trump’s other cases play out this year. Source: usatoday

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Fraud. Pause. Judgment. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump cannot line up full bond in New York fraud case, offers to post $100 million Donald Trump on Wednesday lost a bid to pause a $454.2 million civil fraud judgment against him for overstating his net worth and real estate values to dupe lenders, meaning he must soon find the cash or post a bond to prevent New York authorities from seizing his property while he appeals. The decision by Associate Justice Anil Singh of the New York Appellate Division must be affirmed by a full panel of the mid-level state appeals court. Singh granted Trump's request for a stay of a portion of Justice Arthur Engoron's Feb. 16 decision barring the former president from running any New York corporation or seeking loans from the state's banks for three years. In asking for the stay earlier on Wednesday, Trump's lawyers said he is unable to post a bond for the full amount of the judgment while he appeals and wants instead to secure a $100 million bond. A bonding company would be on the hook for any payout if Trump loses his appeal and proves unable to pay. In their filing with the Appellate Division, Trump's lawyers said a stay of Engoron's decision was needed because Trump would suffer "irreparable harm" if James were free to sell his real estate assets to raise capital to pay the judgment. The lawyers also said the "exorbitant and punitive amount of the judgment coupled with an unlawful and unconstitutional blanket prohibition on lending transactions would make it impossible to secure and post a complete bond." They said a $100 million bond, together with Trump's "vast" real estate holdings and ongoing oversight by a court-designated monitor for the Trump Organization, would be more than sufficient to secure the judgment. Developing... Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-cannot-line-up-full-bond-new-york-fraud-case-offers-post-100-mln-2024-02-28/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Illinois. Eligibility. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Illinois judge says 14th Amendment bars Trump from 2024 primary ballot A judge in Cook County, Illinois, on Wednesday ruled that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the "insurrection clause," bars former President Donald Trump from the 2024 Republican primary ballot. The order overrules a January determination from the Illinois State Board of Elections that Trump could remain eligible. Cook County Circuit Judge Tracie Porter placed an immediate stay on her decision until March 1 "in anticipation of an appeal to the Illinois Appellate Court, First District, or the Illinois Supreme Court." Trump plans to appeal the ruling, a source familiar confirms. The Supreme Court is currently debating Trumps appeal. The ultimate ruling from the SC will also set the precedent on how things will play out for the rest of this year. I personally don't think it'll be great news. I really hope I'm wrong. The precedent will be set either way. Developing...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments on whether former President Trump can be barred from reelection under the 14th Amendment. Trump's attorney contends that he is not an elected official or an officer of the United States, arguing that Section 3 applies only to those in office, not candidates. He warned that affirming the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to remove Trump from the ballot could disenfranchise millions of voters. Conversely, the plaintiff's attorney claims Trump disqualified himself by attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power through insurrection. The court's decision will ultimately address Trump's eligibility in light of these allegations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To the US Supreme Court hearing arguments on whether former president Trump could be barred from reelection under the 14th amendment. Trump's attorney argued the former president is not covered under section 3 as an elected official, claiming also that he's not an officer of the United States. He also said that section 3 can't apply to a candidate only to those who hold office. He said that if the US Supreme Court affirms the Colorado Supreme Court's decision, which removed Trump from the ballot in that state, that it would, quote, take away votes of potentially tens of millions of Americans. The plaintiff's attorney argued that president Trump disqualified himself by trying to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power by engaging in insurrection against the constitution. He says that ultimately is this court's, is what this court is going to decide, and it's the question of whether Trump's eligibility holds amid that issue for the country. So let's bring in senior national correspondent Terry Moran outside the Supreme Court, ABC News Supreme Court contributor Kate Shaw, and ABC News executive editorial producer

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE This could be game over: Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case The justices agreed on Wednesday to decide whether Trump enjoys "total immunity" from prosecution. The timing of that decision likely means a trial over Trump's role in Jan. 6 won't begin — much less end — before the election. There's nothing Trump wants more in this case than a delay. If he wins in November and hasn't been tried before Inauguration Day, there's a good chance he never will be. "This could well be game over," election law expert Rick Hasen. Trump's first briefs are due to the high court in about three weeks. Oral arguments will be in late April. That sets the stage for a ruling in late June, at the end of the court's term. That's about as fast as the Supreme Court is capable of moving. The justices have kept the actual trial on ice in the meantime. The fundamental issue in this case — whether presidents are fully immune from prosecution over anything they did in office, even after they've left it — is one of the most profound questions of presidential power the court has ever had to answer. A lower court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's claims of immunity, ruling that he could be prosecuted for Jan. 6. Between the lines: The justices had options here. They could have declined to hear Trump's appeal. They wouldn't have had to tackle the question of presidential immunity, and Trump's trial would have proceeded before the election. That's what some legal experts were anticipating, based on how long it took the justices to announce whether they'd hear the case. Once they agreed to hear the appeal and decide whether presidents are beyond the reach of the criminal-justice system, keeping the trial paused makes sense. If you're not sure whether someone can be prosecuted, it's logical not to prosecute them until you've figured that out. Source: https://www.axios.com/2024/02/29/trump-wins-delay-immunity-case-supreme-court

"This could be game over:" Supreme Court hands Trump big win by taking immunity case A delay is what Trump wanted most — even if he loses at the end of it. axios.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Ballots. Rulings. Election intel: #BREAKING Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Donald Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado’s primary ballot last year, the US supreme court has ruled, clearing the way for Trump to appear on the ballot in all 50 states. The court’s unanimous decision overturns a 4-3 ruling from the Colorado supreme court that said the former president could not run because he had engaged in insurrection during the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. The Colorado decision was a novel interpretation of section 3 of the 14th amendment, which bars insurrectionists from holding office. “We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the court wrote in an unsigned opinion. Congress, the court said, had to enact the procedures for disqualification under Section 3. “State-by-state resolution of the question whether Section 3 bars a particular candidate for President from serving would be quite unlikely to yield a uniform answer consistent with the basic principle that the President … represent[s] all the voters in the Nation,” the court added. Maine and a judge in Illinois had also excluded Trump from the ballot – decisions that are now likely to be quickly reversed. All nine justices agreed with the central holding in the case: that the Colorado supreme court had wrongly barred Trump from appearing on the ballot. But agreement did not extend beyond that. "For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case," Justice Barrett wrote in her concurring opinion. "That is the message Americans should take home." Trump, praised Monday's ruling. "It was a very important decision," he said in Mar-a-Lago hours after it was announced, calling it "very well-crafted. And I think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together." He added, "I have great respect for the Supreme Court, and I want to just thank them for working so quickly and so diligently and so brilliantly." Moves and countermoves. The cabal thought it would be easier to simply just remove Trump from the ballot as a contingency if Trump so happens to win his court cases. The states that elected to remove Trump from the ballot are compromised. The patriots there need to expose all corruption from the local governments there. Colorado. Illinois. Maine. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/04/trump-scotus-colorado-ruling

Trump was wrongly removed from Colorado ballot, US supreme court rules Court’s decision clears way for ex-president to appear on primary ballot in all states theguardian.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Dossier. Judgements. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Trump is ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over the Steele dossier President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay a six-figure legal bill to a company founded by a former British spy that he unsuccessfully sued for making what his lawyer called “shocking and scandalous" false claims that harmed his reputation. A London judge, who threw out the case against Orbis Business Intelligence last month saying it was “bound to fail," ordered Trump to pay legal fees of 300,000 pounds[$382,000], according to court documents released Thursday. The Octogon has the judges. They are sleepers. This is just setting the stage for Trump’s upcoming criminal trials. Be prepared. Source: https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/trump-ordered-pay-legal-fees-after-failed-lawsuit-107891658

ABC News – Breaking News, Latest News and Videos Page Unavailable abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Judges. Charges. COMMS. Election interference intel: This is a win. But the battle is far from over. #BREAKING Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others in the case involving an alleged attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia. The brief order from Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee states that six of the counts in the 41-count indictment returned by a Fulton County grand jury in August must be quashed. Of those six counts, Trump was charged with three of them. Joining Trump in the challenge to the six counts were former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and lawyers Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Ray Stallings Smith, and Robert Cheeley All had pleaded not guilty to the charges brought against them. Steve Sadow, Trump's lawyer, said the court's decision to quash the counts is the correct one. "The ruling is a correct application of the law, as the prosecution failed to make specific allegations of any alleged wrongdoing on those counts," he said in a statement. "The entire prosecution of President Trump is political, constitutes election interference, and should be dismissed." Eastman's attorney, Buddy Parker, said in a statement that "the court stated clearly the state failed to provide what exactly in the U.S. and Georgia constitutions the defendants solicited the public figures to violate, a clear error. We await the state's position on its intention in moving forward on the remaining charges." Allyn Stockton, Giuliani's local lawyer, said the quashing of the six counts was expected, as "there simply was not enough detail to put the defendants on notice of what to defend against." McAfee's ruling The six counts relate to various alleged attempts to solicit state officials to violate their oaths of office, both to the Georgia Constitution and the U.S. Constitution. The judge wrote that the state failed to specify what those violations were, saying the allegations were "so generic as to compel this Court" to quash the six charges. "The court's concern is less that the state has failed to allege sufficient conduct of the defendants — in fact, it has alleged an abundance. However, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is, in the undersigned's opinion, fatal," McAfee wrote. He said that though the six counts as written contain "all the essential elements of the crimes," they "fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission, i.e. the underlying felony solicited." Additionally, they don't give the defendants enough information to prepare their defenses "intelligently," McAfee wrote, as they could have violated Georgia and U.S. Constitutions "and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways." Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-georgia-case-some-charges-dismissed-2020-election/#

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee dismissed some charges against former President Trump and his co-defendants related to pressuring public officials to overturn the 2020 election, citing a lack of specificity from prosecutors. Three of Trump's charges were dropped, including one tied to his call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump's legal team viewed this as a positive development, although a former federal prosecutor noted it was only a partial victory, as the case remains largely intact. A significant decision is expected soon regarding the potential disqualification of District Attorney Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who recently disclosed a romantic relationship. If disqualified, a new attorney could take over the case, possibly affecting its progress.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Decades in jail. Here's CBS's Nicole Killian. Speaker 1: Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee threw out charges that accused former president Trump and several of his codefendants of pressuring public officers to violate their oaths as part of an alleged effort to overturn the 2020 election. McAfee said district attorney Fani Willis and her prosecutors were not specific enough about the violations, writing, the lack of detail concerning an essential legal element is fatal. Just 3 of Trump's 13 gowns were tossed, including one for his January 2021 phone call to Georgia secretary of state Brad Raffensperger. Speaker 2: I just wanna find, 11,000 780 votes. Speaker 1: Trump's legal team applauded the ruling. Speaker 0: It was a step in the right direction. It goes to the sloppiness of, frankly, the the prosecutors down there. Speaker 1: Former federal prosecutor Tom Dupree said it was only a partial victory for Trump. Speaker 2: Judge's decision effectively has the result of narrowing the case against Trump and the other defendants. It doesn't eliminate it entirely, though. Speaker 0: It is a lie. Speaker 1: McAfee's ruling comes ahead of a highly anticipated decision this week about whether Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade should be disqualified from the election interference case. Last month, the pair admitted to having a romantic relationship for about a year after Wade was hired, but denied any wrongdoing. Speaker 2: The romantic relationship ended before the indictment was returned. Yes or no? Speaker 0: To a man, yes. Speaker 1: The sprawling racketeering case against the former president and his associates remains largely intact. But if Willis is disqualified, another attorney could be assigned to the case, which could significantly impact the proceedings. Nora? Speaker 0: And potentially delay them. Nicole Killian, thank you so much.
Georgia judge tosses some charges against Trump and others in 2020 election case A Fulton County judge on Wednesday tossed out several counts brought against former President Donald Trump and five others. cbsnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Georgia. Judge. Fani Willis. Octogon intel: #BREAKING Judge rules Fani Willis can stay on Georgia case, but only if prosecutor steps down in [17] page ruling If Fani pack steps down. They would have to pick an entire team. That would delay the case indefinitely. So will she fire her prosecutor bae?

Video Transcript AI Summary
A major ruling has been made in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 co-defendants. Judge Scott McAfee has allowed Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis to remain on the case, although he noted an appearance of impropriety regarding her relationship with a prosecution team member, Nathan Wade. Trump’s attorneys argued for her disqualification based on this appearance, but the judge found no actual conflict of interest. Willis can either let Wade go or step aside with her entire office, but the case can proceed without significant delays. This outcome is seen as a positive for Willis, allowing her to continue without the complications of bringing in a new team.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News special report. Good morning. I'm Whit Johnson in New York, and we're coming on the air right now because there has been a major ruling in Georgia's election interference case against Donald Trump and 14 other codefendants. Judge Scott McAfee has just ruled Fulton County District Attorney Fonnie Willis can remain on the case. So let's get right to our senior investigative correspondent, Aaron Koutierski. Because, Aaron, the way the judge laid this out here, there are multiple options to work with. Speaker 1: There are with because he did not totally clear the district attorney here in Fulton County from the whiff of but he said Donald Trump and some of his codefendants failed to show that there was an actual conflict of interest posed by her relationship with another member of the prosecution team, Nathan Wade, whom she hired to help run the case. But he did say there was an appearance of impropriety. And so while disqualification was not necessary, the judge did give options. The decision says the district attorney may choose to step aside along with the entirety of her office or she can let Nathan Wade go and the case can continue. So with the ball is now in Fani Willis' court to decide how to proceed. Speaker 0: Alright, Aaron. Stand by. Let's bring in Olivia Rubin, our investigative reporter. And, Olivia, I know you've been following this closely. Of course, the appearance of impropriety, this is exactly what Trump's attorneys and the attorneys of the other codefendants were trying to lay out. Speaker 2: It's exactly what Donald Trump's attorney, Steve Sadow, and many of the other defense attorneys told the judge should be enough to remove her from the case. They said that there is enough in Georgia law that should mean that an appearance of a conflict should get her kicked off, but that is exactly what the DA argued against, telling the judge immediately after we saw all of those, you know, high stakes evidentiary hearings saying that there is no case law that just an appearance of conflict should lead to a disqualification and urged the judge really, really in this I I think it was a 17 page filing saying there must be an actual conflict of interest. And as we just heard from Erin, the judge ultimately found that there was no actual conflict of interest, that the trips that they took together, that the money that was paid by Nathan Wheat's card, remember Fani Willis said she paid that back in cash, that she had no financial benefit, and that should dispel any idea that she had a financial stake in keeping the case going. So when the judge heard that, it seems that that seemed to dispel any notion that she had any sort of personal stake here. And I think it's likely that we're gonna hear from the DA that this is a win for her case. I think it's not, you know, the worst outcome that Nathan Wade, which is likely the option that they're going to choose, is going to have to step aside because the case will continue forward. Fonnie Willis can continue forward, and it does not have to get tied up now by this outside body having to pick an entirely new team to come in and pick up the case, probably delaying it indefinitely. So that has been avoided today if they take the option of Nathan Wade Wit.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Attorney. Michigan. Arrests. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in DC. Stefanie Lambert was arrested by the U.S. Marshals after a hearing over possible sanctions against her for disseminating confidential emails from Dominion Voting Systems, the target of conspiracy theories over former President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss. Lambert obtained the Dominion emails by representing Patrick Byrne, a prominent funder of election conspiracy theorists who are being sued by Dominion for defamation. Earlier Monday, Lambert had acknowledged passing on the records from Dominion Voting Systems to “law enforcement.” She then attached an affidavit that included some of the leaked emails and was signed by Dar Leaf, a county sheriff in northern Michigan who has investigated false claims of widespread election fraud from the 2020 election, to a filing in her own case in Michigan. The rest of the documents were posted to an account under Leaf’s name on X. Lambert contended that the Dominion documents obtained under discovery were evidence of “crimes” and needed to be disclosed. Dominion is trying their best to hide exculpatory evidence. If Dominion is not stopped. They will steal the election again. This means they will start another pandemic. To get massive mail-in ballots again. Patterns. Source: https://apnews.com/article/voting-machines-dominion-defamation-68d3f3a4e840ccb7a81d72837c4f6b3e?taid=65f8e50fa8059200016d3705&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter

Pro-Trump Michigan attorney arrested after hearing in DC over leaking Dominion documents A Michigan attorney who unsuccessfully sued to overturn former President Donald Trump's 2020 loss has been arrested after a hearing on a separate case in Washington, D.C. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. New York. Election interference intel: #BREAKING New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Trump's lawyers had asked to adjourn the New York trial indefinitely until Trump's immunity claim in his Washington, DC, election interference case was resolved Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan deemed Trump’s request untimely, ruling that his lawyers had plenty of opportunities to raise the immunity issue before they did earlier this month. "This Court finds that Defendant had myriad opportunities to raise the claim of presidential immunity well before March 7, 2024," Merchan wrote, adding that Trump and his lawyers could have made the argument on September 29, 2023, which he says was just six days before he made the same presidential immunity argument in Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation into Jan. 6 and election interference. Trump's trial begins on April 15th, 2024. The cabal will try and damage, sentence, and pass judgments by any means necessary up until the election Developing... Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-hush-money-trial-rejects-trumps-request-delay-scotus-rules-immunity

New York judge in hush-money trial rejects Trump's request for delay until after SCOTUS rules on immunity Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan has rejected the former president’s bid for a delay in the hush money trial until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on his immunity claims in another case. foxnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Markers. COMMS. Trump. Trial. Judge. Courts. Denial. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Judge again declines Trump's latest appeal to delay NY hush money case A New York appeals court on Wednesday declined another bid by former President Trump to delay his hush money trial for the third time this week. The former president’s lawyers took aim at three rulings by Judge Juan Merchan: Refusing to recuse, not delaying the trial until the Supreme Court rules on Trump’s presidential immunity claim and requiring Trump to seek permission before filing new motions before trial. Trump is using a maneuver under New York state law, known as an Article 78 proceeding, that involves suing the judge over their decisions. The filings were placed under seal and are not publicly available. The Hill has requested comment from Trump’s lawyers. It marked the latest of a series of eleventh-hour efforts by Trump’s lawyers to stop jury selection from beginning Monday, which would mark the first criminal trial of a former president. The three appeals will now go to a full five-judge panel for consideration. The Octogon controls the judges, jury, and prosecutors. We'll see if the Supreme Court rules by Friday or Monday. Which is highly unlikely. If not, the trial will proceed. And then the only way the Supreme Court can rule is on appeal if found guilty. This would mean all appellate courts would have to deny the appeal first before ultimately bringing it before the Supreme Court. Most of the time, that process could take years. This is a sinister plot by the cabal. Developing... Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4586672-trumps-latest-hush-money-trial-delay-effort-denied-by-appeals-court/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Judge. Prosecution. Jury. Election interference intel: #BREAKING Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Begins With Jury Selection Here’s what else to know about Mr. Trump’s trial: This is the Manhattan criminal case against Mr. Trump, and it was brought by the district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, a year ago. Mr. Trump is facing 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and, if convicted, could face up to four years in prison. The case, one of four indictments facing the former president and presumptive Republican nominee, may be the only one to make it to trial before Election Day. Jury selection will be crucial for both sides. Prosecutors have some advantage, as the jury pool is drawn from Manhattan, one of the most Democratic counties in America. Mr. Trump’s team will be looking for red needles in a blue haystack. Mr. Trump has twice sought Justice Merchan’s recusal, citing his daughter’s work as a Democratic political consultant. Justice Merchan has declined to step aside, noting a ruling by a judicial ethics commission that found his daughter’s work posed no conflict for him. “There is no agenda here,” Justice Merchan said in court on Monday, adding, “we want to follow the law, we want justice to be done.” Mr. Trump has also attacked the judge’s daughter on social media. Hundreds of potential jurors have been summoned. Those who say they cannot be fair or otherwise serve are being excused, and the remaining prospective jurors will answer 42 questions compiled before the trial. Lawyers on both sides will be able to remove a limited number of them without explanation. The lawyers can also ask to remove a potential juror “for cause” by providing specific reasons they believe that person cannot be fair. In addition to the payment to Ms. Daniels, Mr. Bragg’s office is expected to highlight two other deals involving The National Enquirer, a tabloid that has longstanding ties to Mr. Trump. In one deal, the tabloid bought the silence of a man who had heard that Mr. Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock, a rumor that turned out to be false, and in the other, it paid Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model, who wanted to sell her story of an affair with Mr. Trump. The prosecution’s witness list is expected to include David Pecker, the former publisher of The National Enquirer, as well as Hope Hicks, a former aide to Mr. Trump. Ms. Daniels and Ms. McDougal could also testify.■ The judge contends that if Trump misses any day of the trial, he will be arrested and sent to jail. Developing... Source: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/15/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial

No Jurors Picked on First Day of Trump’s Manhattan Criminal Trial Donald J. Trump faces charges he falsified business records to cover up a sex scandal while serving as president. More than half of the first group of prospective jurors was dismissed almost immediately. nytimes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Comms. Trump. Judge. New York. Prison. Trial intel: #BREAKING New York judge says Trump can't attend Supreme Court arguments on presidential immunity The New York judge overseeing former President Trump’s hush money trial said Monday that Trump can not attend arguments on presidential immunity at the Supreme Court next week. It came after the judge earlier delayed a decision on allowing Trump to attend his son Barron’s high school graduation in May. The decision to not allow Trump to be in Washington, D.C., on April 25, when the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a presidential immunity claim Trump is making in his federal criminal case, came just before the New York trial adjourned Monday. “Arguing before the Supreme Court is a big deal, and I can certainly appreciate why your client would want to be there, but a trial in New York Supreme Court … is also a big deal,” Judge Juan Merchan said to Trump lawyer Todd Blanche, rejecting his request to let the former president play hooky.■ These are further comms suggesting that the judge, jurors, and prosecution are in cohoots with the Octogon. I definitely don't trust this magi judge. Protected. Well insulated. Are prison comms. Source: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4595849-ny-judge-trump-supreme-court-presidential-immunity/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump & Barron: #BREAKING A Heartbroken Trump just wrote: "Who will explain for me, to my wonderful son, Barron, who is a GREAT Student at a fantastic School, that his Dad will likely not be allowed to attend his Graduation Ceremony, something that we have been talking about for years, because a seriously Conflicted and Corrupt New York State Judge wants me in Criminal Court on a bogus “Biden Case” which, according to virtually all Legal Scholars and Pundits, has no merit, and should NEVER have been brought. "This Fake Case is solely meant to attack Crooked Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME, who is seriously leading him in the Polls, for purposes of Election Interference. The Judge, Juan Merchan, is preventing me from proudly attending my son’s Graduation. Seems very unfair, doesn’t it? But this whole event is unfair. Every one of the many Fake Cases that are perpetuated by the White House in order to help the Worst President in History, by far, get Re-Elected, are UNJUST SCAMS. We won’t let that happen, but we will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" The cabal is doing Trump dirty. Karma. The cabal will get theirs in the end. Justice can't come quick enough.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jurors. New York. Election Interference intel: #BREAKING Lawyers has completed their selection of12 jurors to serve in Trump hush-money case Lawyers in Donald Trump's historic criminal trial on Thursday selected 12 jurors who will assess his guilt or innocence over the coming weeks in a case stemming from a hush-money payment to a porn star. Lawyers for the defense and the prosecution still in their selection phase. Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-hush-money-jury-selection-resumes-lawyers-probe-bias-2024-04-18/

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. NY AG. Letitia James. Octogon intel: #BREAKING New York AG Letitia James asks the judge to void Trump's bond over his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. In a 26-page filing ahead of a pre-scheduled hearing on Monday, James expressed concern about whether Knight Specialty Insurance Company could secure the $175 million bond. She also argued that the collateral put up by the former president should be under the full control of the company. One of James' concerns about KSIC is that the insurer "is not authorized to write business in New York and thus not regulated by the state’s insurance department." She added that the company "had never before written a surety bond in New York or in the prior two years in any other jurisdiction and has a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million." Developing... Source: https://www.yahoo.com/news/york-ag-letitia-james-asks-233142759.html

New York AG Letitia James asks judge to void Trump's bond in his civil fraud verdict New York Attorney General Letitia James on Friday asked that a judge void former President Donald Trump's bond in his civil fraud case, questioning whether the company that issued it has the funds to back it up. yahoo.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The court has upheld the $175 million bond tied to Trump. Friday, I reported that James was challenging the court to not accept Trumps $175 million payment. The court rejected James' motion. Who doesn't want $175 million?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: A court has ruled that Trump's $175 million bond will remain in place, despite challenges from New York Attorney General Letitia James. Former federal prosecutor Tchaikovsky indicated that this ruling is likely to hold up. James argued that the insurance company backing the bond might lack sufficient resources for an appeal, but the court disagreed. The bond must be held in cash, not in fluctuating assets like mutual funds or securities. Knight Insurance will manage the account and provide monthly financial statements to the attorney general, confirming the $175 million is secured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. So here's the breaking news. And the former federal prosecutor, Tchaikovsky, and I were just talking about this, and he said this was not gonna hold up. He said Trump's gonna be fine. So the court has just ruled that the bond, that $175,000,000 bond that Trump put up will stand despite the fight that the woman on the right, Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, was trying to slide in. And and what did Cherkowsky call it? He called it she was trying to play a legal technicality, saying that the insurance company that Trump was using wasn't going to have the resources to back up that bond should he fail an appeal. Well, the court says the bond can stay. 175,000,000 needs to be in cash, not mutual funds or securities where value can fluctuate. Knight Insurance cannot trade or move the money, but they will have control of the account and will provide a monthly financial statement to the attorney general showing $175,000,000 in

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Memo. Judge. Orders. Patriot intel: #REPORT Trump just released this memo hours ago. It's a comm. This will set the precedent on how this trial will go and his remaining 4 trials.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Immunity. Precedents. Trump. Supreme Court. Future comms intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court case set to argue about immunity for President Trump The Supreme Court has scheduled a special session to hear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted over his efforts to undo his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden. The case, to be argued Thursday, stems from Trump’s attempts to have charges against him dismissed. Lower courts have found he cannot claim immunity for actions that, prosecutors say, illegally sought to interfere with the election results. The Republican ex-president has been charged in federal court in Washington with conspiring to overturn the 2020 election, one of four criminal cases he is facing. A trial has begun in New York over hush money payments to a porn star to cover up an alleged sexual encounter. The Supreme Court is moving faster than usual in taking up the case, though not as quickly as special counsel Jack Smith wanted, raising questions about whether there will be time to hold a trial before the November election, if the justices agree with lower courts that Trump can be prosecuted. The patterns suggest that Trump will not get immunity from prosecution. What does this mean and why does it matters? This will set future direction to go after all of the other living presidents. But unfortunately, it'll have to start with Trump. The letter of the law has to be followed, especially because of this corrupt 2 tired justice system. Every T crossed. Every I dotted. Every R and N cannot be run together. Think rn = m. Think corney/comey. If everything is not done right. This nation is over. You will have new foreign occupants in the Whitehouse. You think no one is fighting back now? No one will definitely fight back then. Our nation stands on the precipice. Source: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-immunity-prosecution-capitol-riot-9fd5dc5947dab82bbd18d3efcb4267d8

What to know in the Supreme Court case about immunity for former President Trump The core issue being debated before the Supreme Court on Thursday boils down to whether a former president is immune from prosecution for actions taken while in office. apnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Secrets service. Trump. Trial. Arrest comms: #BREAKING Secret Service prepares if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case The U.S. Secret Service held meetings and started planning for what to do if former President Donald Trump were to be held in contempt in his criminal hush money trial and Judge Juan Merchan opted to send him to short-term confinement, officials familiar with the situation told ABC News. Merchan on Tuesday reserved a decision on the matter after a contentious hearing. Prosecutors said at this point they are seeking a fine. “We are not yet seeking an incarceratory penalty," assistant district attorney Chris Conroy said, "But the defendant seems to be angling for that." Officials do not necessarily believe Merchan would put Trump in a holding cell in the courthouse, but they are planning for contingencies, the officials said. There have not been discussions yet about what to do if Trump is convicted and sentenced to prison. Developing... Source: https://abcnews.go.com/US/secret-services-prepares-potential-trump-contempt-order-hush/story?id=109542824

Secret Service prepares for if Trump is jailed for contempt in hush money case Judge Merchan on Tuesday reserved decision after a contentious hearing. abcnews.go.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Supreme Court. Immunity. Clarence Thomas. Trial intel: #BREAKING Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas raised the question to Trump’s lawyers if they have challenged special counsel Jack Smith's authority to bring charges against the former president, which could provide a loophole that may disqualify Smith. Mr. Sauer said that Trump attorneys have not raised such concerns "directly" in the current case at the Supreme Court however, Trump’s attorney John Sauer agrees with the "analysis provided by AG Edwin Meese and AG Michael B. Mukasey," referring to the amicus brief the two former attorneys general submitted to the Supreme Court on March 19. In the brief, the two attorneys general argue that Mr. Smith "does not have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution." Developing... Source: leadingreport

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Trial. Jury. Deliberations. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Jury Now Deliberating In Trump’s Hush Money Trial—And Trump Can’t Leave Until There’s A Verdict Jurors began deliberating Wednesday over whether former President Donald Trump should be criminally convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, bringing nearly six weeks of testimony and arguments in the historic trial to an end—though it’s unclear how long it will take them to reach a verdict. Jurors started deliberating at approximately 11:30 a.m. Eastern time Wednesday after Judge Juan Merchan delivered the jury instructions, following closing arguments on Tuesday that stretched into the evening hours. Parties in the case—including Trump—can’t leave the courthouse during the jury’s deliberations until there’s a verdict, Merchan told the parties. All parties, including the Jurors, can not leave until a verdict is made. Developing... Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/05/29/jury-now-deliberating-in-trumps-hush-money-trial/?sh=2ab9e5bf23c0

Jury Won’t Reach Verdict In Trump Trial Today As Court Ends For The Day It’s unclear how long it could take the jury to reach a verdict. forbes.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Judge. Jury. Octogon intel: The cabal are desperately trying by any means necessary to find Trump guilty of any offense so they can sentence him to prison. #BREAKING The judge in Trump's case tells jurors they could be split ‘4-4-4,’ and he will still treat them as unanimous verdicts This is insane!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The judge has indicated that jurors do not need to agree on the specific crime involved in the case, which is unprecedented. In typical criminal cases, jurors must unanimously agree on the elements of the offense, such as intent and the nature of the crime. Here, the key element that elevates the charge from a misdemeanor to a felony is the concealment of another crime. The judge's ruling allows for disagreement among jurors about what that other crime is, which undermines the basis for the felony charge. This is significant because the case could not have been pursued as a misdemeanor due to the statute of limitations expiring in 2019, making the felony charge crucial for the prosecution's ability to proceed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First could do. He just delivered, what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. He said that there is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could split 444 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it's really outrageous because in a normal criminal case, every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case, it's, you know, you have to rob. It's gotta be a financial institution. You have to show intent. Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that were that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here, what we're doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony because, remember, falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you're concealing or committing another crime. And here, the judge is telling them they don't have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, what makes it a 4 year potential prison penalty rather than, a year or less, but it's also what gets us into the courtroom. Because if if this had been a misdemeanor, the the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. So the only reason they're still able to bring this case is because it's a felony, allegedly, and yet now the judge is saying Speaker 0: That these jurors could do.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jurors just rang the courtroom! Either they have a question or verdict. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Jury asks the judge a question via note: They asked for a witness testimony transcript from former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury just asked to rehear the judge’s instructions. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The kury in the Trump trial was dismissed for the day. The court resumes tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. ET. Apparently, the jury can only leave if the judge dismisses them. I will post all updates as they come in on this thread. Be sure to bookmark all pills and all threads.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE These are the jury instructions from the judge: 👇

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING Media. Trump and team head back into the courtroom. Could be another jury question. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE Chaos continues to ensue outside of the courthouse. Apparently, according to the reporters emails. The people returning back to the courtroom were from a lunch break. Credit: NYP

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. Soc media. Judge. Corruption. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Trump just posted minutes ago on his app Truth Social and went in on judge Merchan Will the jury reach a verdict at 6pm? 6 o'clock can be dangerous.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#UPDATE The jury doesn't want to stay until 6pm today. The judge left it up to them. Jury is said to leave 430pm est. No verdict is expected today. Developing...

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

I strongly believe the jurors have already made their decision. And going home early to marinate on it. They'll return tmr with a Not Guilty verdict.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING VERDICT REACHED IN TRUMP TRIAL!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

#BREAKING TRUMP FOUND GUILTY ON ALL 34 COUNTS!

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Verdict. Sentencing. Cabal intel: #BREAKING Trimp sentencing is set for July 11th, 2024. The probation interview is being set, too. Judge just told the jury there free to discuss the trial with anyone. The verdict shouldn't surprise anyone. These are Octogon courts. Their minds were already set. The Octogon controls the judges, courts, jurors, prosecutors, district attorneys. The cabal needs Trump out of the way by any means necessary. Cabal is not going down without a fight. Trumps other trials will be similar. This entire fiasco has to play itself out between now and election day. That's if there is an election. I've been telling you they're poised to take it again. Bidan won't make it. Harris becomes president and names Gavin Newsom her VP. Pandemic part 2 is already slated. The summer war has already been set. This is all corruption to high firmament. Where do we go from here? Prep. That's all I'm going to say publicly.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump COMMS: #BREAKING Trump donation page crashed shortly after the verdict was read The sentencing date is 4 days before the GOP Convention on July 18th, where they officially nominate Trump for president.

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

COMMS. Trump. Supreme Court. Rulings. MI Intel: #BREAKING Trump wins Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. Will delay Trumps cases until November and beyond. Major blow to the prosecution[s] Supreme Court Ruling: Trump v. United States (23-939) The nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority; he is also entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts; there is no immunity for unofficial acts.■ I've told everyone since the beginning. The SC ruling is very important and that it would go in Trump's favor. Why? Because military tribunals are needed. If Trumps presidential immunity wasn't granted. This would mean the cabal presidency of Bidan. Obama. Bush. Clinton. Would also be brought up on indictments and charges. That can't happen. Why? We have a double jeopardy law. This means someone can't be charged with the same crime twice. The Octogon Group controls the courts, judges, jurors, lawyers, prosecutors, and politicians. So yes, it would've been nice to have them all publicly charged, indicted, and arrested. But all of them would've been cleared of everything. These deepstate cabal[Octogon] members have to be tried in military tribunals. That's the only way to legally and lawfully end this deepstate cabal in America. This ruling should come as no surprise to those who have been following the patterns. Source: https://www.supremecourt.gov/

Home - Supreme Court of the United States supremecourt.gov

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

Trump. COMMS. Sentencing. Judges. Patriot intel: #REPORT Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. The sentencing hearing, previously scheduled for July 11, will now take place Sept. 18 at the earliest, according to a letter posted on the court's docket. The delay guarantees that Trump won't be sentenced until after he is formally nominated for president at the Republican National Convention, which begins July 15, and that sentencing will happen less than two months before the presidential election. This is perfect timing, actually. It gives us a chance to prep and finish up your preps before all hell breaks loose. At the same time, it's giving the cabal the opportunity to get their black operations together. As they prepare for Trump to retake the throne. Be ready. Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-trumps-hush-money-trial-delays-sentencing-supreme-court-immunity-rcna160028

Judge in Trump's hush money trial delays sentencing following Supreme Court immunity ruling The judge overseeing Donald Trump's New York criminal case approved a delay of the former president's sentencing Tuesday after his lawyers asked for more time to argue that the Supreme Court's immunity decision calls for a new trial. nbcnews.com

@WayneTechSPFX - WayneTech SPFX®️

🚨GOOD NEWS ALERT!🚨 Courts. Judges. Trump. Classified. Patriot intel: #BREAKING Judge dismisses Trump "classified documents" case A Trump-appointed judge in Florida has dismissed the criminal case against Donald Trump that charged him with illegally holding on to classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort. The US district judge Aileen Cannon made the ruling after a hearing in which the former president’s legal team urged her to drop the charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith, and notably, after the supreme court said the president has immunity for official acts. Trump’s team had argued that he is the victim of selective prosecution and is being targeted by Democrats as he seeks to regain the presidency. A huge win against the cabal! Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/jul/15/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-speech-milwaukee-shooting-joe-biden-us-politics-latest-news-updates

Trump joins crowd at Republican convention hall with bandaged ear, in first public appearance since assassination attempt – as it happened Ex-president emerges to cheers and chants of ‘USA! USA! USA!’ as he appears amid supporters theguardian.com
LauraLoomer
Posted - October 30, 2023 at 1:42 PM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 2:46 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

A weeklong trial will begin in Colorado today to determine whether President Donald Trump will be BANNED from the ballot in Colorado in 2024 under Sec 3 of the 14th Amendment. I don’t see a single @HouseGOP member talking about this. Neither is @SpeakerJohnson. These people are USELESS.

bennyjohnson
Posted - December 18, 2023 at 4:02 AM
Saved - December 18, 2023 at 7:59 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

TUCKER: “Every power center in the country will do anything to prevent Trump from winning… I’m very worried about it.” https://t.co/Pyh8tCaf50

Video Transcript AI Summary
Every power center in the country is determined to prevent Trump from winning again. They claim to value democracy, but their actions suggest otherwise. If they don't let Trump win, it will expose the fraudulent nature of their democracy. It's like being kidnapped and then seeing the kidnapper's face - once you know who they are, they can't let you go. They should be honest about their dislike for Trump and their support for Biden, allowing the American people to make their choice. But they won't do that. Instead, they continue to charge Trump with crimes while ignoring their own wrongdoing. If they would just let a free and fair election happen, the country could improve. But they are too hysterical to allow that. This is a cause for concern.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In this case, it seems irresolvable. So you have, you know, basically, every power center in the country will do anything to prevent Trump from winning anything. I mean, that's the most important thing for them is to keep Trump from becoming president again. Now why is that? It's a whole separate and very interesting conversation, but that's just it. Okay? And these are the same people who are lecturing us about democracy. We're saving democracy. Democracy dies in darkness. Democracy is the most important thing. You heard that creepy defense contractors say what we're really doing is preserving democracy. We're not just selling weapons, we're preserving democracy, which was a nauseating clip, And I hope on some level he's punished for that. But anyway, but then at the same time, you have Trump like his leading the race in in every nonpartisan or all the liberals are showing leading the race, beating Joe Biden in the in the battleground states. So, like, they can't let him win, but if they don't let him win, then it's just super obvious that all this democracy stuff was fraudulent and that it's not a democracy. It's an oligarchy run by the richest people that Bernie Sanders, back when he was a free man, was telling the truth. And so at that point, like, the veil's off. We can't pretend anymore. Like, when they killed Kennedy, which they did. They could kind of pretend like everything's fine. But after this election, there's no pretending everything's fine. Everyone will know. And it is a little bit like you get kidnapped, you get thrown in the back of the car, and all of a sudden the kidnapper turns around and lowers his this. Can you see his face? And that's not a good thing. Because once you see his face, he has to kill you because you know who he is. He can't let you go then. Okay? So you sort of want the kidnapper or to keep his mask on because the pretense allows him the freedom to let you go in the end and pretend everything's fine. But they've showed us who they are with such shun, unless they decelerate and and just and just do what they should do, which is, like, look. We don't like Trump. Here's why. We don't think he's good for the country. Here's why. We think Joe Biden's great. Here's why. America, make your choice. But I don't think they are going to do that. They're morally obligated to do that, but they won't. And it's incumbent on them to do that. Stop charging them with bullshit crimes that your own people skate on. Like, that's the truth. Stop that. Just let the to happen. Let's have a free and fair election for the first time in a while since 2016. And if we if they allowed that to happen, I think the country would get better. And then if Trump is a crappy president, okay, we survived it the 1st time. He's not very radical, actually. He's pretty moderate. We'll be fine. But I don't think I think they're too hysterical to allow that to happen. And so I'm very very worried about it.
annvandersteel
Posted - December 19, 2023 at 11:39 PM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 12:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Colorado Supreme Court has disqualified President Trump from the GOP Primary Ballot, leading to Republican voters feeling disenfranchised. The author urges patriots to join #TrumpsArmy and take action against the Democratic Party's alleged fascist behavior. They call for SCOTUS to overturn the decision and emphasize the importance of securing a better future for our children. The author, a 4-Star General in Trump's Army, is determined to fight against this ruling.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel

Well folks, it’s over. The Colorado Supreme Court has just disqualified President Trump from being on the GOP Primary Ballot. Which means every Republican voter in the state just got disenfranchised. ULTIMATELY. By the Democrat Party. Patriots, it’s time to enlist in #TrumpsArmy! The time for pearl-clutching and strongly worded tweets is OVER! The DNC has gone FULL FASCIST, and it’s up to us who are old enough to know what America MUST BE can save her. SCOTUS MUST OVERTURN THIS NOW! Liberal children may not mind losing their freedoms… BUT OUR KIDS DESERVE THE BEST FUTURE WE CAN GIVE THEM! I am a 4-Star General in Trump’s Army and I will fight this with everything I’ve got. Who’s with me?

LizCrokin
Posted - December 20, 2023 at 12:13 AM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 12:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Colorado Supreme Court disqualifies Trump from the presidential primary ballot due to the 14th Amendment. However, it's likely to be overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court. This effort by the Deep State may backfire and actually gain Trump more supporters. #NCSWIC

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President via the 14th Amendment and removed him from Colorado’s presidential primary ballot. Everyone should calm their tits for two reasons. 1. This will most likely be turned over by the U.S. Supreme Court. 2. This latest malicious effort by the Deep State to prevent the next Trump presidency will have the “mugshot effect” and only gain him more supporters. #NCSWIC

@EricTrump - Eric Trump

Prediction: This Colorado decision will add 5%+ points to @realDonaldTrump already runaway polls.

thevivafrei
Posted - December 20, 2023 at 12:16 AM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 12:35 PM

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

BREAKING: Colorado Supreme Court BARS Trump from ballot? Don't fall for the Psy-Op.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court declaring Trump ineligible to be on the primary ballot. They criticize the decision as partisan and claim it is designed to enrage the public and provoke a response. The speaker believes the ruling is a political move and that the media will use it to create sensational headlines. They warn against falling for the manipulation and urge people not to engage in any violent or illegal actions. The speaker concludes by expressing their faith in the United States and the resilience of its democracy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I did a vlog today. Let me just make sure I'm looking at the right cameras right there. Alright. I did a vlog today. I'm not gonna do another highly edited vlog. This is gonna be a walkie talkie, speakie, vlog. And as I'm doing it, I just saw oh, that dog. Hold on one second. Come on in. Let's go. Let's go get him here. As I'm doing it, as I'm sitting down to do this, I got the text message from Robert Barnes. I'm looking for the wrong camera. This is the camera. I got the text message from Robert Barnes stating that I am right in my assessment of the Colorado supreme court ruling that just came down a moment ago. That is rocking the interwebs people. It's like it's it's shocking. It's shocking. Your breath smells. I feel bad now. I immediately feel bad that I insulted my dog to the world. His breath just smelled like dog food. Alright. So the Colorado Supreme Court just came down with a split decision for 3 ruling that Trump shall be declared ineligible from being on the primary ballot in the state. It's a 2 13 page decision, so I'm not tending to have read it in the 1 hour that has transpired since it came down. Baffled them with bullshit. I'm sorry to swear. I'm gonna do it right now. I'm not editing this crap. Baffle them with bullshit. If you can't win them with reason, baffle them with bullshit. I started reading the decision. It's a whole lot of bullshit. I'll tell you that much. But the media is going crazy. Social media is going crazy. People are like, you know, on their wits end, they're at their wits end. And that's by design. This decision is a steaming pile of judicial dog crap. No insult to you, sir. It's a steaming pile of judicial dog crap. I've read through enough of it to know, but I had not read through all of it to state it definitively. I'm just going to cite the part where I was like, the dog needs to leave the room. Get okay. If you don't talk to get that, get out and don't come back. All right. I'm going to read the section that, definitively confirmed in my view that this is horse shit. This is a political move to try to enrage the general public, at least half of the population to do something stupid. You know, when you're dealing with 70,000,000 people, just say let's let's narrow it down. Let's say 30,000,000 people, And you want to trigger at least 1 person to do something stupid so the media can run with it. What do you do? You issue this bullcrap ruling, Knowing the way the media is gonna frame it, knowing the way people are gonna misunderstand it, and just hope that somebody does something stupid a la January 6 so that the government come come down and do exactly what they did with the January 6th or is and more. That's what this is because I I I'm reading it and I get to the first, not the first paragraph. It's the 9th page. My gosh, my eyes are getting terrible. And it says this, I'm not getting ready for the world to TV without my glasses because my nose gets exponentially bigger, but I can't focus on the screen without doing it. Forgive me, Internet. This is when I knew it was bullcrap. We also we are also cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory. No crap. Crossing the Rubicon is uncharted territory. It didn't work out very well for Julius Caesar and others. I hope it's Julius Caesar. And that this case presents several issues of first impression. No shit, Sherlock. You know what those are? You are interfering with elections, Supreme Court of Colorado. Oh, it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter. I'll read it without commentary. But for our resolution of the electors challenge under the election code, the secretary would be required to include President Trump's name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot. Read that again. But for our resolution of the elector's challenge, the person would be required to include Trump's name on the ballot. What happens here, though? This is page 8 to 9. Therefore, to maintain the status quo pending any review by the US Supreme Court. Yeah. Here's things I would bet on death, taxes, and this decision being challenged to the Supreme Court. We stay our ruling until January 4 in brackets the day before the secretary's deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot. What does that mean, people? We're going to issue a load of steaming horseshit of a decision, but we're going to stay our own decision until the day before The day that the state person needs to know who's gonna be on the ballot. But wait, there's more. Not only do we recognize that our decision, majority, 4 to 3 split decision, Is a steaming pile of judicial dog shit? They're going to stay their decision until January 124, 2024, the day before the secretary's deadline to certify the content of the president of the department of the department of the department of the department of the department of the fires on January 4, 2024. Then the stay shall remain in place until the secretary will continue. Sorry. What the heck am I looking at here? If a review is sought in the Supreme Court before the state expires on January 4, 2024, then the state shall remain in place and the secretary will continue to be required to include president Trump's name on the 2024 bat primary ballot until receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court. Let me put my glasses back on because I don't like being naked and And I'm naked with all my glasses. I don't like being ugly. I'm not superficial, but I don't like looking ugly. What did we just hear? Alright. We've issue this ridiculous bullshit order. 4 to 3 split decision from the Supreme Court of Colorado, which is the higher court from the state court. They heard it from the state court and I, am I wrong or did they overturn the state court? I think they over to the state court. It doesn't matter. The Supreme Court has issued the split decision. And I say, yes. Trump engaged in inciting the erection. Oh, I'm sorry. No. I was I was quoting Chuck Schumer. He engaged in insurrection and is therefore disqualified under the 14th amendment 3rd article of the United States Constitution. They are so worried about election interference, interruption of democracy that they've got to interfere with elections and mess with democracy. I was gonna say f with democracy, but I'm it's a child friendly program. What did they just say? Oh, yeah. We're declaring Trump ineligible to be on the ballot, but we're staying our own decision until January 4. That's the day before the state court decides or the state ballot decides who goes on the ballot. And unless Trump petitions the Supreme Court, well, you know, then who knows what happens. But if he petitions the Supreme Court, Then our stay will remain in effect until any other further order from the Supreme Court of the United States of America. What do you think's gonna happen, people? Oh, no. Trump's not gonna challenge that to the Supreme Court. He's gonna live with the decision because it's justice, after all, a bunch of rogue justices, rogue, corrupt, partisan hack justices keeping trump off the primary ballot. Like fun, they will like fun. So what's gonna happen? They're gonna stay the decision until, hold on, let me just get the date again. Take my glasses off. They stay until January 4, the day before the secretary's deadline to certify the content of the presidential primary ballot. And if Trump appeals it to the Supreme Court, they're going to say it indefinitely. So that's what's going to happen. That's what's going to happen. And I know that I'm comfortable trouble in my initial assessment, which I posted before. Barnes confirmed that I was intelligently accurate with my assessment. What is this? It's an illusory bullshit, partisan, corrupt hackery of a decision with Absolutely no practical, consequence because the decision that they just issued, they stated on their own until January 4th. And if someone petitions this to the Supreme Court, they state indefinitely until and I quoth one more time. Until I quote, until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court, capital supreme, capital c court. So they've done nothing except given a headline to the media to run it for the next few months. Like, what other court order were I forget what it was. You know, they oh, like it was from Colorado. That's right. This is all coming together. That judge, Wallace, appointed by whatever the governor is, who was supported by George Soros, That judge said, I can't keep him off the ballot, but I do declare that he engaged in insurrection. Bullshit. It's bullshit through and through. I do declare that he engaged in insurrection in a civil court case coming to criminal conclusions. I declared that he engaged in insurrection, but I can't keep him off the ballot. Well, the Colorado Supreme Court found a way to keep him off the ballot, except they're not keeping off the ballot because they're staying their own Partizan bullshit court order. If they appeal it to the Supreme Court, they'll state indefinitely, which they're going to do, which is going to happen, period. What happens in the meantime? Media gets to run with bullshit headlines. I'm sorry. I'm swearing a lot. They get to run with bullshit headlines. If they're lucky, by the way, if they're really lucky, they're gonna enrage some random citizen to do something stupid. Don't do it. Don't break the law. Don't do anything stupid. Don't succumb to these forces. This is a sigh up. This is a, manipulating the general public to Try to do something stupid so that Joe Biden, so that the courts can come down and say, look at these people. They're they're such savages. They respond violently to just judicial court orders. They want someone to do something stupid so they can then take this court order, which they're going to run for headlines, then take a stupid response from someone to run with headlines. And I'll say this right now. Anybody who does anything stupid in response to this court order, fed poster, Fed actor. Fed, Fed, Fed, you're a Fed. Because anybody who does it is not working with or for Trump or in Trump's best interest. They're actually working in the interests of the parties that want to trigger this response. If it happens, it's a fed period. Bottom line. But that's what they want to happen. So they get to issue this court order. Meaty's gonna run with the headlines. Trump declared ineligible on the Colorado ballot, pending confirmation from the Supreme Court, which will not happen, but people are gonna read it and say, Trump's been, excluded from the ballot. I wanna go crazy. Don't. But they want someone to go crazy so they can then say exclude from the ballot and his violent supporters, have engaged in violence because they don't respect democracy because the people who wanna keep someone off the ballot are gonna judge others for not respecting democracy. Okay. And then by the way, as I'm doing this video, 10 minutes of ranting lunatic Barnes. And I saw it come up sideways because my phone is sideways said, you're correct. This is a bogus ruling for bogus headlines to trigger a response so they can then hope set. Something happens that will allow them to pursue this charade, this game of politics at the expense of the Republic of these United States of America. They won't get away with it. They won't get away with it. And it won't happen. And I will not contribute to it because these United States of America are beautiful. The experiment is beautiful and it's not gonna be destroyed. The republic is not gonna be destroyed by a bunch of partisan activist hacks of judges, corrupt media that will run with the story, whip people up and do a frenzy and hope that someone does something stupid so they can do even more ridiculous stuff, but that's it. Don't fall for it. It's bullshit. The rulings bullshit. It stayed pending January 4, stayed pending, adjudication by the Supreme Court of the United States. So it stayed indefinitely, but they wanna trigger people. We are smarter. We are educated and we will not be so triggered. All right, people. Man, 2 blogs in one day, go viva bornslaw. Locals .com if you want more of this amazing insight and yes, I call it amazing insight. Go forth and prosper.

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Link to commie tube https://youtu.be/o9oCywrlUW4?si=Mg3TeFgrW8HHSFba

Video Not Available youtube.com
ImMeme0
Posted - December 20, 2023 at 7:07 PM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 7:53 PM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

BREAKING: California lieutenant governor Eleni Kounalakis urged state secretary Shirley Weber to “explore every legal option” to remove president Trump from the 2024 primary ballot. https://t.co/atODjG6qq8

Prolotario1
Posted - December 20, 2023 at 8:00 PM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 3:00 AM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

🚨 What did I tell you all? More states would follow Colorado. California Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis urges Secretary of State to explore every legal option to remove Trump from California's 2024 ballot.

GregRubini
Posted - December 21, 2023 at 5:21 PM
Saved - December 21, 2023 at 8:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump is expected to be on the ballot in all 50 states and win the elections, according to the posts. The Trump legal team plans to file a petition to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court's ruling is crucial to prevent a dangerous precedent and maintain the US as a constitutional republic. The posts also mention the dismissal of Trump indictments and raise questions about the individuals behind them. PerkinsCoie, George Soros, and Marc Elias are mentioned as being involved in various lawsuits and decisions, including the selection of Kamala Harris as VP. The posts suggest a close relationship between PerkinsCoie and the FBI, raising suspicions about their involvement in events leading up to January 6, 2021. PerkinsCoie is also known for representing Hillary Clinton, Adam Schiff, and Nancy Pelosi.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

1) "In the end, President Trump will be on the ballot in Colorado, and in all the other 49 States" "And he is going to win the Elections" Keep calm, Listen and Retweet! . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEQz76jNnjs

Video Not Available youtube.com

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

2) The Trump legal team will file a petition to the Supreme Court, very soon. In a matter of days. The Supreme Court will rule very quickly that President Trump must be on the ballot in ALL the 50 States, and all these frivolous lawsuits will be over and done.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

3) Why the Supreme Court will rule that President Trump must be on the ballot in ALL the 50 States? Because, otherwise, this will set a VERY DANGEROUS precedent: it would mean that the US has become a FASCIST Dictatorship, and ceased to be a Constitutional Republic.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

4) Besides: ALL the 4 Trump Indictments will be dismissed, soon. Probably in Jan. 2024, or in February. The “January 6” case will be dismissed soon. The Georgia case, too. Analysis in my article: https://gregrubini.substack.com/p/trump-indictments-dismissed Please Retweet! .

The Trump Indictments will be Dismissed, soon The Trump Indictments will be dismissed. The “January 6” case in Washington DC will be dismissed soon. The Georgia case too. gregrubini.substack.com

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

5) You will wonder: WHO is behind the 4 Trump Indictments? - George Soros - Marc Elias - PerkinsCoie (Law Firm in Wash. DC with 1200 lawyers) Marc Elias is this guy: @marceelias Marc Elias was the MAIN lawyer at PerkinsCoie for years. His fee: $1400 per Hour. https://t.co/eyJF90lFbJ

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 6) and you will wonder: WHO is behind all those frivolous lawsuits to DELETE Trump from the ballots in Colorado and in other 23 States? The same guys: - George Soros - Marc Elias @marceelias - PerkinsCoie https://t.co/tgzE69dPDN

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias coincidence?

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 8) and who fought the Election Fraud Lawsuits filed by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada? The same guys: - Marc Elias @marceelias - PerkinsCoie (I wonder if it was George Soros who footed their bills..) https://t.co/LAzKOcTbBG

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias just another coincidence...

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 10) and who picked Kamala as VP, in 2019? The same guys: - Marc Elias @marceelias - PerkinsCoie At that time, in 2019 and 2020, Marc Elias was still the MAIN lawyer of PerkinsCoie https://t.co/54AkYv5avU

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 11) well, that was not a smart choice, Marc Elias @marceelias - was it? choosing Kamala as VP was a huge blunder from your side... Do you regret it? Marc Elias, now you cannot throw the fake Joe Biden under the bus, until you are able to force Kamala to step down...

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 12) and what about January 6? we know Jan. 6 was a Plan concocted by the FBI, DHS, Nancy Pelosi, the DC Police, George Soros and Antifa. But who concocted the term "Insurrection"? Nancy Pelosi was certainly not smart enough for that... too busy with the Vodka.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 13) We can conclude it was not the VodkaManiac Nancy Pelosi. So who concocted the term "Insurrection"? Was it you, Marc Elias? @marceelias After all, "Insurrection" is a term which belongs to the legal realm...

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 14) Marc Elias @marceelias , do you know Michael Hayden and Michael Chertoff? You all live in Washington DC...

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias 15) and who fought against Kari Lake @KariLake , against all the Lawsuits she brought in Arizona, regarding the STOLEN Elections for Governor? You guessed it... an ARMY of 15 lawyers from PerkinsCoie PerkinsCoie = Law Firm of 1200 lawyers https://t.co/ruj63uwm3H

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 16) note, re: #14: in case you don't know who are Michael Hayden and Michael Chertoff, you can do your own research... or... you can ask Marc Elias.

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 17) The FBI. Remember the Durham Indictments? Remember Michael Sussmann? Sussmann was indicted by Durham for "Lying to the FBI" He got away scot free. https://t.co/1SMmxpFpaO

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 18) The FBI. Michael Sussmann is a lawyer. Guess in which Law Firm was he working? Perkins Coie. Indeed, Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann were the 2 Top lawyers of Perkins Coie. https://t.co/EzrXanMQlc

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 19) The FBI. Michael Sussmann was a good friend of James Baker, who was the General Counsel (Top Lawyer) at the FBI. https://t.co/7YbWLvrvXp

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 20) The FBI. Where did James Baker go, after he left the FBI? He went to work at... Twitter, as Deputy General Counsel of Twitter. paid $12 million per year. and who introduced James Baker to the Twitter Execs? Michael Sussmann, lawyer at PerkinsCoie https://t.co/FMazQHD0Hy

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 21) The relationship between PerkinsCoie and the FBI was so close, that PerkinsCoie had a permanent office at the FBI Headquarters at 935, Pennsylvania Avenue, Wash DC. Think about it... How many times did you go to that office at the FBI, Marc Elias? @marceelias

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake 22) Marc Elias, did you go to that PerkinsCoie office at the FBI also in the weeks before January 6, 2021? @marceelias just curious to know... @TuckerCarlson told me he wants to know, too https://t.co/3ud2ECaUp7

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake @TuckerCarlson 23) Marc Elias, did you meet also with Christopher Wray in the weeks before Jan. 6? @marceelias Did you plot anything together? just curious to know... and Tucker @TuckerCarlson wants to know, too. of course, you met at the 7th Floor of the FBI HQ... https://t.co/yaPePi7oBP

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake @TuckerCarlson 24) Marc Elias, maybe you plotted an "Insurrection" with the FBI Director Christopher Wray, in the weeks before Jan. 6, 2021? just asking... https://t.co/vwoOeOCbJp

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake @TuckerCarlson 25) I forgot to mention that PerkinsCoie represents also Hillary Clinton. (2016 campaign) and Adam Schiff. and Nancy Pelosi. https://t.co/csTbmmgMSb

@GregRubini - Greg Rubini - Fauci Files - GregRubini.com

@marceelias @KariLake @TuckerCarlson 26) PerkinsCoie represented also Barack Obama in 2008 and in 2012. is it correct, Marc Elias? @marceelias Was it you, Marc Elias, the main lawyer for Barack Obama? Did you represent also Big Mike? https://t.co/2Aq4xiKqxL

VigilantFox
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 4:17 PM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 4:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trump team claims that the Colorado Supreme Court ruling to remove Trump from the ballot is influenced by Soros-funded left-wing groups. These groups, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Free Speech for People, have received funding from ActBlue and Open Society Foundations. The use of a law meant to exclude Confederate rebels to bar Americans from voting for Trump is criticized. The situation is likened to an election in Russia or Venezuela. Additional posts cover various topics including COVID cover-up, medical hoaxes, Tucker Carlson's warning, an Italian health minister under investigation, and being prepared for the "next pandemic." The author expresses gratitude for the support and encourages following for real-time updates.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🧵 THREAD: Surprise, Surprise - Soros Bucks Are Behind Colorado Ruling to Remove Trump from the Ballot Let's take a closer look at the Trump team's statement: “Unsurprisingly, the all-Democrat appointed Colorado Supreme Court has ruled against President Trump, supporting a Soros-funded, left-wing group’s scheme to interfere in an election on behalf of Crooked Joe Biden by removing President Trump’s name from the ballot and eliminating the rights of Colorado voters to vote for the candidate of their choice. Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls. They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November. The Colorado Supreme Court issued a completely flawed decision tonight, and we will swiftly file an appeal to the United States Supreme Court and a concurrent request for a stay of this deeply undemocratic decision. We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor and finally put an end to these unAmerican lawsuits.” Continue reading in the thread below ⬇️

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - The Trump campaign referenced two Soros-funded left-wing groups behind this ruling: the so-called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, as well as another group called Free Speech for People.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump campaign claims that a left-wing group funded by George Soros is responsible for a recent ruling. The ruling involves two organizations, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Free Speech for People, which are backed by the Democrat-affiliated AgBlue organization and have also received funding from George Soros' Open Society Foundations. These groups are using a law originally meant to prevent confederate rebels from holding office to prevent Americans from voting for President Trump.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Trump campaign referenced a Soros funded left wing group behind this ruling. And what they're referring to here, are the 2 groups behind this Colorado case. The so called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, as well as another group called Free Speech for People. And in regards to the funding sources for these 2 groups, quote, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, and Free Speech for People are backed by the Democrat affiliated AgBlue organization, which enabled fundraising for Joe Biden's presidential campaign. Inevitably, both also turn out to have received money from Open Society Foundations, the jewel in the crown of George Soros's multi billion Open Society Foundations organization. And so, behind it all, are 2 non profits which have both received funding from George Soros' Open Society Foundations, and they're now using a law originally intended to exclude confederate rebels from holding office, to instead bar Americans from being able to vote for President Trump.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - However, the funding of those nonprofits is quite jarring: “[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and Free Speech for People] are backed by the Democrat-affiliated ActBlue organization, which enabled fundraising for Joe Biden’s presidential campaign. Inevitably, both also turn out to have received money from Open Society Foundations, the jewel in the crown of George Soros’ multi-billion Open Society Foundations organization.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 -“And they’re now using a law originally intended to exclude Confederate rebels from holding office to instead bar Americans from being able to vote for President Trump,” remarked @FactsMatterRB.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Balmakov’s Earlier Statements Summarize the Insanity of the Situation Succinctly: “You know that weird, weird feeling when election day finally arrives, you go to your local polling place, only to find that the guy you wanted to vote for has been entirely removed from the ballot? “And he was removed from that ballot by four local judges from the opposition political party. “And so, you say, okay, well, that’s weird. Let me just write his name in. However, those same judges, they instructed the local election officials [not to] count any write-in votes for that particular candidate. “Now, if all this sounds to you like an election somewhere in Russia, in Brazil, or maybe Venezuela, well, you [would] be wrong. This is an election taking place over in Colorado.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Colorado, during an election, a candidate was removed from the ballot by four judges from the opposing political party. Despite this, voters attempted to write in the candidate's name, but the judges instructed election officials not to count those votes. This situation may seem reminiscent of elections in countries like Russia, Brazil, or Venezuela, but it actually occurred in Colorado.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know that weird, weird feeling when election day finally arrives, you go to your local polling place only to find that the guy you wanted to vote for has been entirely removed from the ballot. And he was removed from that ballot by 4 local judges from the opposition political party. And so you say, okay, well that's weird. Let me just write his name in. However, those same judges, they instructed the local election officials to not count any write in votes for that particular candidate. Now, if all this sounds to you like an election somewhere in Russia, in Brazil, or maybe Venezuela, well you will be wrong. This is an election taking place over in Colorado.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@FactsMatterRB #6 - The entire Facts Matter episode with Roman Balmakov is available via the video below: https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/colorado-supreme-court-drops-trump-election-surprise-facts-matter-5550666?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=partner&src_cmp=vigilantf

Colorado Supreme Court Drops Trump Election Surprise | Facts Matter On Tuesday, the Colorado State Supreme Court issued a ruling ordering the secretary of state to remove former President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot. ... theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@FactsMatterRB Thanks for making it all the way to the end! While you're here, check out these stories I wrote for @VigilantNews: Robert Kennedy Jr. unmasks the ‘principal villains’ behind the COVID cover-up. https://vigilantnews.com/post/robert-kennedy-jr-unmasks-the-principal-villains-behind-the-covid-cover-up/

Robert Kennedy Jr. Unmasks the ‘Principal Villains’ Behind the COVID Cover-Up According to the CDC, the COVID-19 pandemic has claimed the lives of over 1.15 million Americans. However, after nearly four years of death and economic carnage, there’s been an underwhelming effort to get to the bottom of where it originated, so this may never happen again. Independent presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr. attests that COVID-19 vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@FactsMatterRB @VigilantNews Dr. Paul Marik exposes the ‘biggest hoax’ in medicine outside of COVID. https://vigilantnews.com/post/dr-paul-marik-exposes-the-biggest-hoax-in-medicine-outside-of-covid/

Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the ‘Biggest Hoax’ in Medicine Outside of COVID “The medical system will kill you.” “The medical system will kill you.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Tucker Carlson Issues Major Warning on What the Establishment Has in Store for Trump https://vigilantnews.com/post/tucker-carlson-issues-major-warning-on-what-the-establishment-has-in-store-for-trump/

Tucker Carlson Issues Major Warning on What the Establishment Has in Store for Trump “They [the establishment] look at Trump as a vampire, and they put a stake in his heart, but they're afraid that that stake could come out any time,” expressed military historian Victor Davis Hanson in a viral video in late November. "They are terrified of him because they think he's smarter this time, and he That next step appears to be taking Trump off the ballot altogether. But Tucker suggested something much more sinister is looming. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Italian health minister under investigation for murder for concealing COVID-19 vaccine deaths. https://vigilantnews.com/post/italian-health-minister-under-investigation-for-murder-for-concealing-covid-19-vaccine-deaths/

Italian Health Minister Under Investigation for Murder for Concealing COVID-19 Vaccine Deaths “He knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects.” “He knew the shots were killing people and gave orders to local health authorities to conceal deaths and serious side effects.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Tucker Carlson Responds to Colorado’s Supreme Court Decision in Viral Three-Minute Video https://vigilantnews.com/post/tucker-carlson-responds-to-colorados-supreme-court-decision-in-viral-three-minute-video/

Tucker Carlson Responds to Colorado’s Supreme Court Decision in Viral Three-Minute Video “None of this seems very American. All of it looks like the actual end of democracy.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The ‘next pandemic’: what you need to do to be ready. https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-next-pandemic-what-you-need-to-do-to-be-ready

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready “You’ve seen all the threats from the establishment suggesting that there’s not going to be drug availability in the not-too-distant future ... So, look at that and protect yourselves.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I never imagined that I would be reporting on the news every day. It's been a wild ride. Thank you for your support. Please help me continue to upend the narrative by hitting the bell 🔔 on my profile page (@VigilantFox) for real-time updates on what the media isn't telling you. https://t.co/xRPSfpPInm

TheMaineWire
Posted - December 29, 2023 at 3:03 AM
Saved - December 30, 2023 at 7:11 PM

@TheMaineWire - The Maine Wire

Bellows on CNN: "No Secretary of State has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access... But no presidential candidate has ever engaged in insurrection" https://t.co/3n0WnZEnVZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand the speaker's point that they are aware of the uniqueness of their decision. They mention that no previous secretary of state has ever used Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to prevent a presidential candidate from accessing the ballot. However, they also note that no presidential candidate has ever participated in an insurrection and been disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Again, I am so mindful, and I I said this in my decision, that it is unprecedented. No secretary of state has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, but no presidential candidate has ever engaged in insurrection and then disqualified under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
JackPosobiec
Posted - December 29, 2023 at 5:58 PM
Saved - December 30, 2023 at 8:53 AM

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

BREAKING: Sheena Bellows admits it is a group of ACLU and SPLC alumni working together to remove Trump from the ballots in key states https://t.co/1mnJPBCFUJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Secretary Bellows discusses the biggest threats to our democracy, highlighting election sabotage and voter suppression as major concerns. She emphasizes the need for better leaders to combat these issues and mentions the importance of federal standards across the country. The deliberate campaign to discourage people from participating in democracy is seen as an attack on the very essence of democracy itself. Secretary Bellows stresses the importance of fighting back to protect our democracy and everything it stands for. The other speaker agrees, acknowledging the validity of Secretary Bellows' points.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, secretary Bellows, I'd love to hear about your thoughts on, like, our biggest threats facing, our democracy at this point in time. Speaker 1: Well, what secretary Griswold just said and named is something that was unimaginable 2 years ago or 10 years ago, and that is election sabotage. Is a crystal clear example of what's happening all across the country. So we need to organize to make sure we have better leaders In positions of power to fight back against that. Secretary Benson talked about voter suppression and That's something that when we started our careers at the ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center, it's fighting back about Systematic structural voter oppression targeting specifically black and brown voters, it's rooted in white supremacy. That is something we have to continue to do work on and secretary Merrill talked about the For the People Act and the Freedom to Vote Act. We must have federal standards all across the country. And then finally, just to echo my colleagues, this is rooted in a deliberate camp an organized campaign to discourage People from participating in our democracy. It is an attack on our very democracy itself because when everyone participates, Everything that we care about, social justice, climate justice, economic justice, we win. Those on the other side are trying to discourage People from participating. That's what this really is about. We have to fight back to protect our democracy, to protect everything. Speaker 0: That's such a good point.
battleofever
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 1:39 PM
Saved - November 12, 2025 at 1:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a thread arguing Jan 6 was a setup by elites to derail Trump, citing claimed insider texts, undercover agents, staged protests, and pre-made statements. It alleges GOP/Dem collusion, political prisoners, misinformation, and calls for releasing full tapes. The posts frame the event as a coordinated coup and demand accountability for those responsible.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@rayeppswasafed - Truly American

Does anyone else remember when Michael Stenger (Senate Master at Arms on J6), basically said there were "Professional Agitators" there? He was found dead after this statement and prior to his in person testimony with J6 committee, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an opportunity to learn lessons from the events of January 6. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitated. Investigation should be considered as to the funding and travel and what appears to be professional agitators.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Runningtowardh1 - Runningtowardhappiness

Note that Michael Senger, in charge of security on J6, talked about "professional agitators" in a prepared statement before he mysteriously died. J6 was meant to derail what T was trying to do, to persuade lawmakers with overwhelming support of patriots. #2000Mules #PeoplePower

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RealTina40 - Tina40

This is DC by Freedom Plaza ... they say it’s for construction work but it’s left out over night ! 🤔🤔 be aware patriots.. watch your 6

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP AOC wasn't smart enough to realize what she'd exposed.

@AOC - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rep. Loudermilk released this statement yesterday: “I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021.” This morning, this footage was released. Dated January 5th, 2021.

@RepLoudermilk - Rep. Barry Loudermilk

🚨BREAKING🚨: The truth will always prevail. As I’ve said since the Jan. 6 Committee made their baseless accusation about me to the media, I never gave a tour of the Capitol on Jan 5, 2021…

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP Oopsie.

@BoLoudon - Bo Loudon

On January 6, 2021, NPR accidentally released an article at 9:33 AM about Trump supporters clashing with police... HOURS before anything like this ever occurred. Set up.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@laralogan - Lara Logan

It is so obvious what is going on here - the Republicans want to get rid of Trump but they don’t want their fingerprints on it so the Dems are doing it for them. They all know if Trump gets on the ballot it’s over. Same with the impeachment of Biden - the Dems want to get rid of him but they don’t want any of the blame so the Republicans are doing that for them. This is the elite establishment in action. They hate “wethepeople” & have no intention of allowing the constitution or the Republic to survive in anything but name only. Would not be surprised if more Dem controlled states follow suit - then the Republicans can say Trump cannot be the nominee because he can’t win if he is off the ballot in these states. Not their fault of course….Trump’s fault as usual!

@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen

THE PEOPLE ARE WITH DONALD J. TRUMP. His removal from the Colorado primary ballot is an ATTACK on our democracy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that political opponents are acting with extreme desperation and pursuing aggressive measures to win the election. Specifically, the speaker states that “crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary,” implying a willingness to employ drastic, even illicit, tactics to achieve victory. The claim continues that these opponents “are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election,” portraying a view that constitutional and legal norms are being broken in pursuit of electoral success. Further, the speaker characterizes Joe Biden as a direct danger to the democratic system, declaring that “Joe Biden is a threat to democracy.” The repetition emphasizes the perceived severity of the threat, with the speaker reiterating that “It’s a threat,” underscoring the seriousness attributed to Biden’s impact on democratic processes. Another central claim concerns the alleged use of state power to influence the election. The speaker contends that “they’re weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference,” suggesting that law enforcement agencies are being directed or used in ways that would undermine fair electoral processes. This accusation is tied to the assertion of electoral advantage, as the speaker claims that such actions are taking place “because we’re beating them so badly in the polls,” attributing the alleged use of force or influence to the current advantage in polling. Overall, the speaker outlines a narrative in which political adversaries are depicted as acting with unprecedented aggression toward securing electoral outcomes, including constitutional violations and the deployment of law enforcement in ways that would interfere with the election. The emphasis is on a perceived threat to democracy and on the strategic use of governmental power as a tool in contested political competition, framed by the assertion of a significant polling lead that allegedly prompts these aggressive tactics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's no wonder crooked Joe Biden and the far left lunatics are desperate to stop us by any means necessary. Are willing to violate The US Constitutions at levels never seen before in order to win this election. Joe Biden is a threat to democracy. It's a threat. They're weaponizing law enforcement for high level election interference because we're beating them so badly in the polls.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Sheckyi - Andrew C ™️

👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻👂🏻 ARE YOU LISTENING?? Former Capitol Police Chief testifies Pelosi lied about her communication with him & made him the scapegoat for J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Pelosi claimed on national television that she had not spoken to the individual since the initial breach of the Capitol and that there had been no communications with him that evening. The individual, referred to as Speaker 1, confirmed that he spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that evening, contradicting her statement. First call (approximately 05:34 PM): The individual went to brief Vice President Pence at a secure location and to conduct a personal assessment of the Capitol, with House Sergeant at Arms Irving informed that he was going over to brief the Vice President. Irving wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. The first call to Speaker Pelosi occurred during this briefing, establishing direct contact while the briefing was underway. Second call (during departure from the initial location): As the individual left the area and was walking toward the Senate with Mr. Stenger, Jennifer Hemingway handed him Emily Barrett’s cell phone, and it was Speaker Pelosi on the line. This second call concerned the information provided to Vice President Pence about when the Capitol could be returned to the chambers, and the individual reassured Pelosi that the information was correct and that they could get back into the chambers by 7:00 PM. The call ended after this confirmation. Third call (06:25 PM): While at the Senate, away from the initial secure location, using Robert Karam’s cell phone, the individual dialed leadership who were off-site at a secure location to brief them. He briefed all of the leadership on the plans to get them back into the chambers, which constituted the third call with Speaker Pelosi. In summary, Speaker 1 asserts that there were three separate conversations with Speaker Pelosi on January 7, each addressing the situation and the plan to restore operations in the chambers, including confirmation of the timeline to return by 7:00 PM. He states that Pelosi’s claim of not speaking with him is inaccurate, affirming that he did indeed have three conversations with her that evening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A second set here. In a press conference on January 7, speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol. But according to your transcribed interview, you were on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Can you explain that discrepancy? Speaker 1: Yeah. That is correct. I spoke to Speaker Pelosi three times that that evening, and she went on national TV and said I'd never spoken to her, but I spoke to her three times. The three three times were the first time when I went over to brief president vice president Pence at the secure location, I had called house sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the vice president. Was also going over to do a personal assessment of the capital. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with, you know, mister Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 05:34, where I first briefed speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location. As I was walking away, I met up with mister Stenger, and we started walking over to the senate to go brief the senate when, Jennifer Hemingway, believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone, and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her, and it was speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my call second call with speaker Pelosi questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers. I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by seven seven p. M, and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 06:25 p. M. I was over at the senate from the secure location I mean, from where the senate had been sequestered. And on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership, who was over off-site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have call number three with speaker Pelosi. Speaker 0: So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls. So speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. Speaker 1: That is correct, sir.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

Many have missed what really happened on J6 - swept up in the 'action' staged outside by the 'protestors.' The entire thing was staged to allow RINOs (and anyone else interested) the occasion to abdicate their duties and bypass their obligation to contest the clearly stolen election. Lauffler, Cruz, , Hawley, Paul, and more had sworn they would help Trump and contest - and they are ALL frauds. They KNEW in advance of the Feds plan to stage J6 - as this was what it was all for - to give them the opportunity 'to walk away.' We KNOW for a fact that several Congress people exposed that they ALL knew of the event prior - as a few were busted sending out J6 'response statements' which were posted TO the internet - some to Twitter - PRIOR TO the event even taking place. Not one of these people came back afterward - or even later - and said, 'Hey, we were in the middle of an official, Constitutional proceeding. It was interrupted, but I wasn't finished contesting.' The reason they DIDN'T ever say that?? Because they never really wanted to back Trump in the first place. They LIED. They knew of the plan prior, and they walked away. ALL part of the COUP.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🇺🇸 J6 FLASHBACK On Jan 05, 2021, Chuck Grassley announced that Pence would not be attending the election certification on 1/06/21 and that he (Grassley) would preside. A very ODD statement and Grassley has never FULLY answered for it. 👉🏼 COUP https://www.businessinsider.com/grassley-prompts-confusion-over-pence-electoral-college-certification-2021-1

GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley briefly confuses everyone over announcement on Pence and Electoral College certification GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley suggested that Vice President Mike Pence would skip the Electoral College certification before backtracking. businessinsider.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Since Mike Pence is making J6 the centerpiece of his campaign, I thought I would compare his book to the J6 committee testimony of his 2 top aides. And guess what? They don't jive. Pence said Marc Short and Greg Jacob showed up 2 hours later than they actually did. Pence made it sound like he singlehandedly wrote his statement rejecting the "Eastman Plan" when he didn't. He said he forgot to save the document on his desktop computer so his daughter had to rewrite a printed version for him. (Short and Jacob never mention this) He also omitted a 9:15 a.m. call from Trump that morning, when he apparently didn't tell the president he was working on a public statement for release. Then he said he traveled to the Capitol with his family--but Marc Short said they were in a different vehicle. Weird. https://www.declassified.live/p/mike-pences-rewriting-of-his-january

Mike Pence's Rewriting of His January 6 Heroism As he makes his actions on January 6 the centerpiece of his campaign, Pence appears to have a different recollection than those of his top aides. declassified.live

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

@StevieW64261083 @GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump Renew your mind. Here's a starter pkg. #J6 #January6th #politicalprisoners

@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto

FLASHBACK: Video never seen or used by J6 COMMITTEE re-emerges of Jacob Chansley reading Trump’s tweet, telling protestors to GO HOME and remain peaceful.. CORPORATE MEDIA DEAD SILENT..

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

Easiest way to tell that FOIA claims of Nancy Pelosi was on the phone at least a dozen times with Ray Epps on J6 is true, is when the media disputes it 💯%

@DesireeAmerica4 - Desiree

Everything about J6 was a hoax, check out the onion in her towel right at the beginning. 🙄

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ma'am, what what happened to you? Speaker 1: I got maced. Speaker 0: You got maced. My my place. And what happened? You were trying to go inside the cafe? I made it like a foot inside, Speaker 1: and they pushed me out, and they maced me. Speaker 0: What's your what's your name? Where are from? Speaker 1: My name is Elizabeth. I'm from Knoxville, Tennessee. Speaker 0: And why did you wanna go in? We're storming the Capitol. It's a revolution. Thank you.

@PizzaPepe - Pizza Pepe 🇺🇸

Another unreleased video from J6. Capitol Police cuff a protestor, then bring him to a side room where they uncuffed him, and fist bumped him.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

Notice how the FBI removed barricades, which the DOJ now says were a magic Secret Service perimeter that more than a thousand Americans have been criminally charged with crossing.

@FreeStateWill - 🇺🇸

At 2:30 p.m. - more than an hour and a half after Ray Epps ran through at the Peace Circle - FBI Swat (supposedly stationed and ready just minutes away) finally pulled into the Capitol.

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

Just released video shows FBI removing barricades on J6. Over 1,000 protestors were charged with knocking down and crossing this perimeter even though Feds had removed it. J6 was a lie just like everything else the Democrats do. Free the defendants.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that Jack Smith’s request to prevent evidence about security or intelligence failures before January 6 is unacceptable, claiming it would excuse Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC for failures. He asserts Pelosi was responsible for January 6 because she did not accept the security help offered, stating that 10,000 troops or National Guard were available if needed before the event, and that the event would have been different if 500 or 200 people had been used; he emphasizes that he offered 10,000 troops and that January 6 would not have happened with a larger deployment. He notes that he personally attended and gave a speech, and claims the audience included the largest number he has spoken to, contrasting with the smaller group that he says went down to the Capitol. Speaker 1 contends that the party should be allowed to introduce evidence showing that there were security and intelligence shortcomings, including the assertion that Pelosi “did not take the security that we offered her,” with the offer of 10,000 troops and the fact that “you had far fewer people than that.” He mentions that the unselect committee did not discuss or include references to “peacefully and patriotically” behaving crowds and says this group was not highlighted by the committee or in their words. He criticizes the prosecutor, calling Jack Smith a “deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out,” and accuses Smith of wanting to suppress testimony because the committee “illegally destroyed everything” and deleted evidence related to Pelosi’s decisions about troop deployment. He asserts that much evidence indicated Pelosi did not want the troops and that a letter from the mayor contradicted Pelosi’s stance. Speaker 0 acknowledges the point but keeps the dialogue focused; Speaker 0 reminds that Capitol Police Chief Steve Sun said January 6 was a preventable event if the intelligence and resources requested had been provided, noting that Speaker 0 sees this as an amazing point and confirms that the offer of troops was in writing. Speaker 1 reiterates that he offered 10,000 troops for January 6 and emphasizes that this fact is in writing, arguing that the prosecution is attempting to suppress relevant evidence. He maintains that Pelosi’s leadership and decisions about security are central to the discussion, and he reiterates the claim that the offer of security was not acted upon. The conversation pivots back to the assertion that the Capitol Police Chief’s past statements support the claim that January 6 was preventable with proper intelligence and resources.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jack Smith says he doesn't want you to be able to introduce evidence in your defense that maybe the January was preventable, that police and others had, engaged in some security failures, intelligence failures beforehand. Your reaction real quickly to the prosecutor's request today. Speaker 1: No. Can you believe this? He's tried to defend Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC, but he tried to defend Nancy Pelosi who did not do the job. We offered them, as you know, 10,000 troops or national guard, whatever they wanted before the event, because I knew it was gonna be a very big event. And I it wasn't my event. I went and showed up and made a speech. We offered 10,000 people and more if necessary. And if they use 500 people, if they use 200 people, January 6 wouldn't have been January 6. So they can you imagine? This guy says, we don't wanna introduce that. Well, that's a very big part of it. She was responsible for January 6 because she didn't take the security that we offered her. We offered her 10,000 troops And, you know, you had far fewer people than that. It was a very small group of people relatively compared to the people listening to the speech was which was, by the way, the largest number of people that I've ever spoken before. Nobody ever talks about that, John. They talk about the group that went down and peacefully and patriotically, as I said, as you know, they don't mention that either. You know, that wasn't even brought up in the unselect committee. They didn't even use those words. They didn't say that I said the words peacefully and patriotically. This is a very dishonest group of people. And the deranged prosecutor, Jack Smith, he's a deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out. And you look at this guy, he doesn't want me to say that they turned down and they turned it down in writing, by the way. And what happened is, as you know, the unselect committee deleted and threw out everything. They threw everything out, which would be illegal. If you ever did that in a court, a regular court as a civilian, could you imagine somebody on the right, a republican or something somebody doing as you know, they deleted and threw out all everything having to do with the hearings because a lot of bad things were said about Nancy Pelosi. A lot of bad things were said about a lot of people that they didn't wanna get out to the public. So they threw out everything. They deleted everything. There is no information. There's nothing left. It's like crazy. And the reason he doesn't wanna do that is because they illegally destroyed everything. They destroyed all evidence. So he wants to do this because of the fact that they destroyed all evidence. They don't have the evidence anymore. And a lot of that evidence was pinpointing that Nancy Pelosi didn't take the troops days in advance. Said it. And I said it loud and clear. And they know I said it because I believe it was the mayor wrote a letter back that she doesn't want the troops. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know. It's exciting. Speaker 1: It's Yeah. But can you imagine a man saying, we're not allowed to bring the fact up that I offered 10,000 troops for January 6? Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: He's you know, look. He's got a bad record. He's lost a lot of cases, and he loses them because he goes too far. He's a sick puppy. Speaker 0: Well, it's important to note the Capitol Police Chief, the former chief Steve Sun, said on this show that January 6 was a preventable event. Had they gotten the intelligence and the resources that he had asked, you offered them. It just didn't happen. It's just an amazing thing. Sir, I wanna turn to Speaker 1: I offered them. It's true. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. There's no doubt. It's in writing.

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

ICYMI: Jack Smith Is Trying to Block J6 Evidence that Proves Pelosi Rejected Troops Offered by President Trump Watch @jsolomonReports full interview with President Trump on #JustTheNewsNoNoise here: https://rumble.com/v43o9fw-just-the-news-exlusive-interview-with-president-trump.html

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism – by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/01/america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=america-distress-how-help-hundreds-political-prisoners-still

America in Distress: How to Help the Hundreds of Political Prisoners Still Held Today by the Biden Regime and Save America from Communism - by J6 Prisoner Isaac A. Thomas | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor           Guest post by January 6 political prisoner Isaac A. thegatewaypundit.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Source of full video https://rumble.com/v2fkvuq-undercover-mpd-footage-from-jan-6..html

undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. undercover MPD footage from Jan 6. https://t.me/StopHateChat/20086 rumble.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨BREAKING: Cell phone video of DC officer on J6 saying “we go undercover as Antifa in the crowd” They’re ADMITTING it How many cops & federal agents were undercover that day? How many instigated violence & property destruction? Release the J6 tapes!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@catmurphy209 - Americat 🇺🇸

It has been three years since the murder of Ashli Babbitt. Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt. "Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead." https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-judicial-watch-launches-lawsuit-against-us-government-for-wrongful-death-of-ashli-babbitt

BREAKING: Judicial Watch launches lawsuit against US government for wrongful death of Ashli Babbitt “Lt. Byrd did not give Ashli any warnings or commands before shooting her dead.” thepostmillennial.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#ReleaseJ6PoliticalPrisoners! @gatewaypundit Article...

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher

Everyone can see, if you’re looking…

@RealFletch17 - Fletch17

Wow! Good clip of the signs and warnings they give to their puppets. Hey @LeaderMcConnell looks like you saw a ghost…….

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@Pro__Trading - Pro America Politics

JUST IN: President Trump says the FBI was "leading the charge" on J6. Cue liberal meltdown...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that there were many of them, noting that there was Antifa and there was FBI, along with a lot of other people there, all leading the charge. “You saw the same people that I did.” The passage ends with, “But just as…”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And those people have to be many of them. I guess there's some. By the way, there was Antifa and there was FBI. There were a lot of other people there too leading the charge leading the charge. You saw the same people that I did. But just as

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP #RayEpps was a Fed

@bamajayt - Bama_Jeans

@DarrenJBeattie about Ray EPPS compared to other Jan 6 protesters I can feel the anger swelling in me again...😡

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

FEDS AND INFORMANTS EVERYWHERE ON J6 "This is much worse than you can imagine" FBI had agents everywhere on January 6th. The FEDS lost count of how many paid informants there were and had to do an audit to find out. Credit: @TheRedactedInc

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

THERE IS NO BASIS FOR ARRESTING THE J6 PRISONERS. J6 was a setup. The police allowed protestors to enter. They need to be released immediately.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The material comes from the United States Department of Justice and shows surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33 PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the Capitol through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34 PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34 PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the Capitol undeterred. At 02:35 PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enters through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered through the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undeterred. At 02:36 PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36:54, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38 PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40 PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44 PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the Capitol. At 02:47 PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was obtained from the United States Department of Justice. It contains surveillance video of the Upper West Terrace doors of The United States Capitol on 01/06/2021. Just after 02:33PM, police officers allow five individuals to exit the capital through the Upper West Terrace doors. At 02:34PM, a gentleman holding an American flag catches the door just as the last protester leaves. He turns to the crowd outside and waves towards the door. At the same time at 02:34PM, a gentleman with a red cap approaches the interior doors. As the police officer notices him, he continues to approach. The police officer holds the door for the protester as he enters the capital undeterred. At 02:35PM, a large group enters the interior of the Capitol, police standing at the doors. As a steady stream of protesters enter through the Upper West Terrace doors, they can see police officers standing at the interior doors allowing people to pass. Around 250 protesters entered to the Upper West Terrace doors that day, many of which are charged with felony obstruction for entering a building undiscouraged. At 02:36PM, a police officer walks towards the exit against the flow of protesters. He then turns around and begins walking with the protesters. He turned his back to them and never took a posture that was defensive or that would indicate that he feared being harmed. At 02:36 fifty four, the police allow the crowd to pass. At 02:38PM, a woman with a sock hat and a camera with a sound recording device attached to it films police as they allow people to enter. A steady stream of individuals pass by police as they stand aside without deterring protesters for several minutes. At 02:40PM, police stopped the protesters to speak to them again. At 02:44PM, a police officer in the bottom of the screen can be seen speaking to the officers in front of them and pulling them away, indicating to the crowd that they are allowed to enter. The officers then turn their backs to the crowd, which indicate that they did not possess fear of the protesters. The officers then escort the crowd into the interior of the capital. At 02:47PM, police wearing yellow gear close the doors. Police presence then increases and no more individual.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

J6: A TRUE TIMELINE FULL DOCUMENTARY J6: A True Timeline presents a never-before-seen timestamped blueprint for the events of January 6, 2021, as they unfolded in real-time. Credit: @InvestigateJ6 https://open.ink/collections/j6

J6 Thousands of crowdsourced video files. Hundreds of hours of CCTV footage. Dozens of police officer body cams. One True Timeline. open.ink

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

NANCY PELOSI'S DAUGHTER ADMITTING J6 WAS A HOAX Nancy Pelosi's daughter was secretly recorded talking about the fake staged J6 insurrection. Shall we keep going? You don't have to answer that.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the political and legal dynamics surrounding potential investigations and trials, focusing on timing, venue, and public interest. - They agree that if Democrats lose the House and the committee is eliminated, public interest may wane. The first trials, if they occur, are expected to attract a lot of attention, similar to anniversaries, but interest could fade once Democrats are out of power and especially if Biden is removed from office. - The idea of dragging proceedings out is considered, with caution that delaying too long could reduce attention. They suggest not initiating a first trial in Washington, DC, because DC has many government workers and may be sympathetic to the defense; this relates to concerns about the potential jury pool. - There is a debate about whether the trial should be moved out of DC. Speaker 1 believes it would be difficult to move the trial and that those in DC would resist removal, arguing that hearings would be seen as fair and the jury would be impartial if held there, contrasting with Speaker 0’s concern about DC’s jury demographics. - They discuss the likelihood of successfully moving the trial, with Speaker 1 asserting that it would not be successfully moved and that the defense or supporters would resist. - The conversation touches on a hypothetical interaction with an individual who might have been involved in insurrection plans. Speaker 0 asks about what the plan would be if such an individual were in line and marching, in a military context, suggesting a scenario where operations would be outlined: “you’re gonna go here,” “you’re gonna go in by this side,” “at this time, we’re gonna take over this.” They describe the insurrection as lacking guns and involving a man “smoking pot,” noting it as the most pitiable insurrection of the 21st century. - They shift to an observation about the Proud Boys, mentioning Gavin McGinnis. Speaker 0 describes knowing Gavin from road trips to parties and finding the term “Proud Wizards” humorous when they first heard it in Brooklyn years ago. Speaker 0 characterizes McGinnis as a provocateur who says shocking things to be funny, and expresses amusement at his elevation to a prominent figure. - Speaker 0 clarifies that they have a personal history with these people and emphasizes that McGinnis says outrageous things, which they view in a historical and somewhat humorous light, contrasting with the contemporary prominence of the group. - The exchange ends with Speaker 0 explaining their familiarity with the individuals and reiterating that the portrayal of these figures is part of their broader historical context.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the one thing, if you drag it out after the Democrats lose the house Yeah. Yeah. And then they get rid of the committee Right. People may lose interest. Yeah. The first trials are gonna get a lot of attention. Yes. It's like anniversaries. If the first one Speaker 1: is a Speaker 0: big deal, they're gonna really be dealing the same. Right. No one's gonna care after the democrats out of power. Right. And then take Biden out of office, then who cares? If you drag it out long enough, I wouldn't go first for a trial because DC is a lot of people who work for the government. Right. And it's a lot of I don't think I'm sympathetic. Speaker 1: That's our the jury. That's the that's the jury issue. We we don't need the trial to be held there. Speaker 0: Well, you guys would, you totally hit off. Speaker 1: I I would. They won't successfully Speaker 0: successfully move move it? It? Speaker 1: No. They won't move it. Because I mean, think about it. They'll they'll resist it. They'll say how I've heard of the hearings. The team. They'll you're say They're in the next say we're not we're not fair. We're fair. Speaker 0: Thank you for your Speaker 1: time. Oh, absolutely. Speaker 0: Listen. I really I I know you're not the bad guy. I mean, if there is I haven't found the bad guy yet. But if there is, I Speaker 1: know you're not guy. I mean, he's he's like a stereotypical bad guy. Speaker 0: But I the the thing is why I asked you the question of, like, so what was the plan is Speaker 1: that Really? Speaker 0: If there was a if there was an interaction, you were you were supposed to be in line marching you're in the military. Speaker 1: You know this? No. Doesn't Speaker 0: You must have a plan. Speaker 1: Exactly. You just go to operations. It's over. You sit down Like Overnight your soldiers. You go over. Alright. You're gonna go here. You're gonna go in by this side. At this time, we're gonna take over this there's none of that. You move the insurrection. It's the sorriest insurrection in in the twentieth twenty first century ever. No guns. A guy Speaker 0: guy People Speaker 1: think so. Guy smoking pot. You know, Speaker 0: on Oh, I love the guy smoking Yeah. Speaker 1: I like for history. Speaker 0: You're gonna be able to laugh about this one day. I don't know what the Proud Boys is, but I know Gavin McGinnis. I went on road trips with them to parties. It was so comical to me when I first started hearing about, like, Proud Wizards from this was, like, years ago when they started saying in Brooklyn where he's from. I was like, what? This guy I mean, he may say he may talk shit, but a lot of it is, like, he's a provocateur. He says it to, like, be funny or whatever. Right. The idea that he's now being elevated to being this Yeah. It totally makes me laugh because I'm like, like, I know this guy. I've been in many parties with him, and I know he just says some crazy shit. I know the I mean, I know the Brooklyn version of those guys, Speaker 1: and I was just Speaker 0: like So I just wanted you to know that. Like, I have a whole history with these people, I'm like, come on. You're you're like, that's just kinda like anyway.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@B_Smallberries - Biff Smallberries

🗳️ STOLEN ELECTIONS & THE 2020 COUP @battleofever @RedpillDrifter J6 - They Needed an Emergency Session 👉🏼 YES !! This Fed-led 'riot' distraction was NOT about 'getting Trump and MAGA' - it was a vehicle to allow Corrupt Congress to STEAL the election. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/01/06/fedsurrection-anniversary-day-they-needed-an-emergency-session/

Fedsurrection Anniversary Day - They Needed an Emergency Session - The Last Refuge In honor of our national gaslighting embarrassment, the third anniversary of the FBI’s fedsurrection, the FBI laughed in the faces of the general population under their control.  The DC-based FBI sent out this message: Yes, the national kidnappers have removed their masks. Y’all know what that metaphor means. Once again, for those who just walked […] theconservativetreehouse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

[Thread] #J6 (Below) Ongoing Compilation of #J6TrueTimeline Next up: 🔥 RINOs 🔥 who prepared statements beforehand, we're in on the setup, and used it as a way to dump #Trump. We are taking names. Another Thread Incoming. #J6WasASetup #AshliBabbitt #RINOsKnew

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@hollywood2pt0 - Jewely💎Blue

📽️The live footage of J6 [they] fed us was NOT LIVE Yes things happened there, but guaranteed what we were FED on NOT-live TV, as well as the pics after-the-fact, were sensationalized...MANIPULATED... PRODUCED SMOKE & MIRRORS Lest we forget what President Trump recorded, that Twitter & the rest of MSM took down to FRAME him and US.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes that on 07/18/2023 special counsel Jack Smith has decided to pursue another arrest and more indictments of President Trump, alleging it is a result of the Fed storming the Capitol on 01/06/2021 and targeting Trump for his role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on that date. He asserts that all President Trump did was give a speech and that he incited nothing. He claims the people disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were “our government.” He argues that when videos from the Capitol appeared, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, claimed the videos were manipulated, asserting they were added to with people, sound, fire, and smoke, probably mirrors, to make it look horrific. He says footage has been removed from the Internet, making reflection on 01/06 difficult, and that all remaining footage is manipulated, stating there was not all the fire and smoke and that the famous picture is a manipulated image. He asserts the rioters didn’t bring guns and that there was no fire or smoke, but instead “where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” and that history has been changed and references are no longer available. He claims that during the Fed’s direction, Trump did say on video what he should have said, including “I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There’s nothing more he could have said.” He notes the video is difficult to find but exonerates Trump, maintaining he incited nothing, especially since the feds were doing most of it. He says this video will be important in the coming weeks and months as Smith continues to go after Trump, predicting suppression of the video by social media platforms, as in the immediate aftermath of the Fed’s direction. He says he captured the video and urges sharing. Speaker 1 quotes Trump: “I know you’re pained. I know you’re hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You’re very special. You’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.” Speaker 0 adds that Tucker Carlson claimed Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing the insurrection hired a Good Morning America producer to dramatize the footage and even dubbed in sound, to make it more sensational, implying the footage was staged. He questions why it would be necessary to add sound and create more people and fire or smoke to redefine the events, suggesting the feds planted and altered footage to present an insurrection. Speaker 2 reinforces the claim with a direct statement: “How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 07/18/2023. And as most of you already know, special counsel Jack Smith has decided to throw another arrest, and god only knows how many more indictments towards president Trump. And it's completely a result of the Fed storming the capital on 01/06/2021. And Smith is going after president Trump for president Trump's role in the effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power on 01/06/2021, which is funny because all president Trump did was give a speech. He incited nothing. The people that were disrupting the peaceful transfer of power were, well, they were our government. And And after all this happened, when videos started coming out from the capital, Tucker Carlson, while still on Fox News, was the one who said what I've been saying all along, that the videos were manipulated. They, I knew, added people and sound and fire and smoke and probably mirrors to make it look horrific because it's hard to do this now because we have nothing to reference. They've removed it from the Internet, but when it was happening on the sixth, I hope you all remember that everybody that was in Washington DC while that was going on, they were having trouble getting any video or footage out to any of us on Twitter or in other states. Washington DC did exactly what they did when I was at the million mega march with my brother in November a few months prior, and they cut Internet. They wouldn't let anybody get information or very little information out. So now it's hard to reflect back on what January 6 was because all the footage has been removed from the Internet. More so, any of the footage that you can still see from 01/06/2021, mark my words, it's manipulated footage. Remember back. Think really hard. There was not all the fire and the smoke. You know that picture we all know? This one right here? This is a manipulated picture. They didn't do all of this. These people that were storming the capital didn't even bring guns with them to this insurrection. There was no fire. There was no smoke. But where there's smoke, there's fire. They've changed the history, what we saw with our eyes, and now we can't recollect it because they've removed it and our ability to reference anything. All that said, during the Fed's erection, president Trump got on video and said exactly what he should have said. This video that I'm putting up here on both Rumble and BitShoot tonight is very difficult to find unless you use the right search words, but it exonerates president Trump. Not that he needs exoneration because he incited nothing, especially because the feds were doing most of it. He said all the right words. I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election stolen from us, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to respect our great people in law and order. There's nothing more he could have said. This is going to be a very important video coming up in the next weeks and months as Smith continues to go after president Trump. They have nothing. They are going to be suppressing this, and just like they did right after the Fed's direction, everybody that put it on Twitter or any social media platform, they would rip it down. They would suspend the person that post it. It's gonna happen again because this piece of video is everything they don't want out there for the rest of the world to see. So I've captured it for you. Share it with anyone you'd like, and get ready for the ride. Speaker 1: I know you're pained. I know you're hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time. There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you. You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace. Speaker 0: And just in case you missed it, this is actually out of my video when Tucker Carlson said, this was back in March or April, that the Democrat party and those involved in planning and organizing this insurrection, that they hired a Good Morning America producer to make it more sensational, and they even dubbed in sound. No. Really think about that. What would be the reason of all the reasons in the world that it would be okay, needed, necessary for those feds that planted the feds' erection to say, here's all this capital video footage. What can we do here to it that we shouldn't be doing? Well, if we add sound and we create more people and we add in fire and smoke, then all of a sudden, this becomes an insurrection. This is the footage we're gonna put out into the public. Anyway, here's Tucker and what he said just a few months ago laying it out there, and it's almost like it didn't happen. Most people didn't even catch him saying this, but it's huge. Speaker 2: How staged and fraudulent was the work of the January 6 committee? Democrats hired a Good Morning America producer called James Goldston to dramatize the footage they released. They even dubbed in audio to make the pictures more sensational as in a docudrama. The networks carried it all live as if it were real.

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@USA_Anne711 - ❣️Anne❣️

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 ‘Then Lied About It’. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard told reporter Neil McCabe: “Milley controlled the Army”, arguing that while the Joint Chiefs boss lacked legal authority within the chain of command, he instead leveraged his profound influence and contacts in the Pentagon to delay the Guard’s response. “The problem was not with Donald Trump; it’s Mark Milley and the Army leadership in control. They stopped the Guard from coming then lied about it and said the Guard acted at sprint speed,” Matthews explained. “This is about civilian control of the military. There was none. There is none. I argue that — Mark Milley had more control over the D.C. Guard on Jan. 6 than Donald Trump did — if Donald Trump wanted to call the Guard to go to the Capitol, Milley wouldn’t let him do it.” Details👇 https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/01/12/explosive-report-army-official-says-mark-milley-delayed-national-guard-response-to-jan-6-then-lied-about-it/

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Army Official Says Mark Milley Delayed National Guard Response to Jan 6 'Then Lied About It'. Colonel Earl G. Matthews, senior legal adviser to Major General William J. Walker, who commanded the Washington D.C. National Guard on January 6th, 2021, thenationalpulse.com

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP!

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

BOMBSHELL.🚨 "It has come out in a recent federal lawsuit that U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd... issued a false radio report that 'shots were fired'..." Ashli Babbitt’s Shooter Michael Byrd Made a False Radio Call Shortly After Fatal Incident https://thepoliticsbrief.com/ashli-babbitts-shooter-michael-byrd-made-a-false-radio-call-shortly-after-fatal-incident/

@battleofever - PatriotAsAMother 🇺🇸

#J6 was a SETUP

@paulsperry_ - Paul Sperry

BREAKING: Obama DOJ official Mary McCord--part of Gen. Flynn coup--secretly worked with J6 Committee's Red Team + Purple Team investigators “We’re already starting to put together a team to think through the most damaging types of things [Trump] might do" https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159

Fears grow that Trump will use the military in ‘dictatorial ways’ if he returns to the White House Donald Trump is sparking fears among those who understand the inner workings of the Pentagon. nbcnews.com
damonimani
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 10:51 PM
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 10:51 AM

@damonimani - Damon Imani

I don't think Adam Schiff and Joy Reid appreciated my thoughts on the consequences of Trump remaining on the ballot: https://t.co/1IVf14pk3a

Video Transcript AI Summary
If the court rules that someone who incited an insurrection to stay in office can remain on the ballot, what consequences will our country face? What if they decide he can stage a coup and then run again? The consequences will be that the voice of the people will be heard, and they get to choose their president. Also, on election night, when he wins, people will get to watch certain individuals cry on air. Thank you for your time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think would be the consequences for our country if this court rules that somebody who egged on an insurrection that was an insurrection for him to remain in office remains on the ballot? If they rule that he can stage a coup and then run again, what do you think the consequences of that will be? Speaker 1: Well, the consequences will be that firstly, of course, the voice of the people will be heard and they get to choose their president. And secondly, on the night of election, if or probably when he wins, people will get to watch you and lying chef here cry life on air like the little bitches you are. Speaker 0: Congressman Adam Schiff, thank you for your time. Much appreciate it.
Prolotario1
Posted - February 20, 2024 at 6:38 PM
Saved - February 21, 2024 at 5:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Comedian John Oliver offers Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas $1 million to step down. It highlights desperation to save oneself. The posts inquire about the SCOTUS judge and who Donald Trump will appeal his case to. Keep an eye on C. Thomas.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Do you know the real reason Comedian John Oliver is offering Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas 1 million to remove himself off the Supreme Court? Do you see how desperate these people are to save themselves? It's a tongue & cheek joke until it's not. Who is the SCOTUS Judge for the Supreme Court? Who is Donald Trump going to appeal his case to? Remember, I told you all to watch C. Thomas. https://youtu.be/Ju_r41rCP00?si=Tr9mEAAXEfr_IeS6

Prolotario1
Posted - April 22, 2024 at 4:02 PM
Saved - April 23, 2024 at 1:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Kari Lake's integrity is being questioned due to her actions in the election. She did not file Chain of Custody Forms, which are crucial for ensuring the integrity of the evidence. The Supreme Court dismissed the Arizona Election Integrity Case without comment, despite expert testimony highlighting vulnerabilities in the voting machines. Kari Lake's presence at the Supreme Court raises questions about her true intentions.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Election Integrity: Something Kari Lake Does Not Have 1st she ran for governor. Mark Lamb was running for Senate. She betrayed him in hope he would promote her run for governor but all of sudden switched mid stride and ran for Mark Lambs sear. People please stop falling for this. You already know my stance on Kari Lake. I did multiple post on her. I would dismiss anything coming from her camp. I told you all to listen to Michele Swinick who is uncovering what really happened on November 8th. Kari Lake did not file any Chain of Custody Forms. Do you know what that is? A Chain of Custody Report, also known as a Chain of Custody Form or CoC, is a document that tracks the movement and handling of evidence from the time it is collected until it is presented in court or disposed of. The purpose of the Chain of Custody Report is to ensure the integrity of the evidence and to prevent tampering, contamination, or loss. Kari Lake is fighting for election integrity right? Here how the Chain of Custody Report would identify what happened on November 8th. Brief: Ballot collection and transport: The report would document when and where ballots were collected from voters or polling places, who collected them, and how they were transported to the counting facility. Any discrepancies in the timing, location, or handling of ballots could raise red flags. Ballot storage and security: The report would detail how ballots were stored, including the location, security measures, and access controls. If there were any unauthorized access or tampering with the stored ballots, it could be identified through the Chain of Custody Report. How can you go to the SCOTUS and do not have any of these standard things? Kari Lake never filed this. Why is everyone pretending the SCOTUS is denying election Integrity? Loom who the fuck it is coming from.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

BREAKING.🚨 The Supreme Court has DISMISSED the Arizona Election Integrity Case without comment. The plaintiffs @KariLake and Mark Finchem has brought forth expert testimony to indicate that there were serious voting machine vulnerabilities, including the "placing of the master cryptographic keys on the election database in plain text and unprotected allows any actor with access to the voting system complete control over the election results." There was a "god key" detected in the voting machine code. "Dominion placed the master cryptographic keys in plain text and unprotected on the election database except for Windows-login, which are easily bypassed. Leaving these highly sensitive cryptographic keys in this state violates all cyber security protocols and allows a malicious actor to take control of the machine and change results without detection," remarked Patrick Byrne. In addition, due to the process of "reconciliation" of the Arizona votes, it was "not possible to know the true outcome of voting at 43 voting centers" because the voting center results were not recorded locally on memory cards. In April 2022, prior to the midterm elections, the two plaintiffs initiated legal proceedings against Arizona state and county election officials in federal court alleging that the voting machines lacked reliability and thus should not be authorized for use. “Plaintiffs have a constitutional and statutory right to have their ballots, and all ballots cast together with theirs, counted accurately and transparently, so that only legal votes determine the winners of each office contested in the Midterm Election,” the complaint said. “Electronic voting machines cannot be deemed reliably secure and do not meet the constitutional and statutory mandates to guarantee a free and fair election." The Supreme Court of the United States did not believe that the issue of election integrity was worth the court's time during another crucial presidential race.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

Did people forget this that fast? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 She already told you she is not interested. So what is she doing at the Supreme Court? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/7Mbs6ayACQ

charliekirk11
Posted - August 5, 2024 at 7:38 PM
Saved - August 6, 2024 at 2:51 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Jamie Raskin is saying that congress will STOP Trump from taking office even if he’s chosen by the voters. This is extremely dangerous. Every Democrat needs to be on the record about this immediately. https://t.co/9IwRoGrrQu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the erosion of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and the lack of action by the Supreme Court to interpret it. They highlight the need for accountability on January 6, 2025, to address potential issues. The speaker applauds Sherlyn for establishing a new center to address these issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What can be put into the constitution can slip away from you very quickly, and the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is section 3 of the 14th amendment, which they're just disappearing with a magic wand as if it doesn't exist even though it could not be clearer what it's stating. And so, you know, they wanna kick it to congress. So it's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified. And then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions all because the 9 justices, not all of them, but these justices who have, not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection, simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th amendment means. And I'm glad that Sherlyn's creating her new center so we can bring that.
nataliegwinters
Posted - October 31, 2024 at 5:06 PM
Saved - October 31, 2024 at 11:14 PM

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Rep. Jamie Raskin: “It’s going to be up to us on January 6th 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs he’s disqualified.” This is the masterplan. https://t.co/hhQLV7r2D1

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6, 2025, we may need to confront the violent Trump supporters and declare him disqualified. This situation could lead to a need for bodyguards for everyone, creating conditions reminiscent of a civil war.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified, and then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions all because
FFT1776
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 5:02 PM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 5:30 AM

@FFT1776 - Sheri™

Jamie Raskin loses his case in court. Reporter confronts him on his threat for a real Insurrection if Trump wins. Listen👇🏻🔊 https://t.co/Yd4LxzjUHW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is it true you’re planning an insurrection if Trump wins tomorrow? Were you really a red diaper baby as Steve Bannon claimed? How long was your father a communist? No comments for the citizens? Having a personal security team seems elitist. New York tags raise questions about outside influences in this district.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congressman Raskin, is it true that you are planning your own insurrection if Trump wins tomorrow? Is it also true that you were a red diaper baby just like Steve Bannon said you were? How long was your father a communist congressman Raskin? No comment for the citizens? Nothing says elitist like a personal security team. New York tags. Who says outside influences aren't at work in this district?
PamKeithFL
Posted - November 8, 2024 at 12:39 PM
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 5:32 PM

@PamKeithFL - Pam Keith, Esq.

Is it possible that the machines were hacked to switch the tallies from Harris to Trump? Because that would make actual sense.

MJTruthUltra
Posted - March 17, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 4:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am now convinced that the use of autopen by Obama to sign laws is significant. He first did this in 2011 for the National Defense Authorization Act while on vacation, and again for a Patriot Act extension. Republican Tom Graves raised concerns about the constitutionality of this practice, questioning what might happen if a president were incapacitated. The DOJ deemed it acceptable at the time, but I believe this issue will eventually reach the Supreme Court, especially with the potential for a judge to overturn Trump's order.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

OH SHIT‼️I am 100% now certain, this is not a coincidence. Obama was the first President to use autopen to sign a law, in 2011. He used the autopen to sign the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 while he was on vacation in Hawaii. He also used an autopen to sign a four-year extension of certain provisions of the Patriot Act in 2011. Republican Tom Graves argued the constitutionality of this action, specifically Article I, Section 7 when he signed the NDAA… citing what if the President was hospitalized? —— What would stop a group of radical cabinet members using autopen to push forth a separate agenda? The DOJ determined it was ok to do at the time.. so OH HELL YEAH, this will definitely go to SCOTUS. After a crooked judge smacks Trumps void order in 3..2..1 https://rumble.com/v6qry8o-obama-was-the-first-president-to-use-autopen-to-sign-a-law-in-2011..html

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Obama authorized the first use of the auto pen signature to sign an extension of the Patriot Act while in Europe. The auto pen is a mechanical pen. Congressman Tom Graves, a Republican from Georgia, is asking the president to confirm that he saw the bill before authorizing the auto pen. Reports say the White House planned to fly the bill to the president, but it would have reached him after the midnight deadline.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Going on today, and here are two things we thought you should know. President Obama made history by authorizing the first use of the auto pen signature to sign an extension of the Patriot Act while he was in Europe. Now the auto pen is basically a mechanical pen. Congressman Tom Graves, a Republican from Georgia, is asking the president to confirm that he saw the bill before giving the go ahead for the auto pen. Reports say the White House planned to fly that bill to the president, but it would have breached him after the midnight deadline. And

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

OH MY GOD… 🖊️ 👀 What if all this wasn’t just about Joe Biden using the autopen? What if it’s about past presidents? Wouldn’t it be crazy if the use of autopens were unconstitutional when signing EO’s and Legislation? How many times have we watched Donald Trump sit in front of the cameras and sign, BY HAND, Executive Orders, then very famously hand out pens? What did Donald Trump famously do as soon as he entered office in 2025? —— he sat down in an arena full of citizens and signed every single EO BY HAND. Donald Trump has NEVER used an autopens for EO’s or legislation. THERE’S A REASON FOR THAT… 🔴 THERE IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REASON 1. Article I, Section 7: This outlines the legislative process, stating that a bill becomes law if the president “approves” it and that he “shall sign it” if he does, or return it with objections (veto) if he doesn’t. —— The phrase “shall sign it” is the key…. does this imply a personal, physical act? 2. Article II, Section 1: The president’s executive power is vested in him —— this suggests that certain acts—like approving laws—are his alone to perform, raising questions about delegating that act to a machine. • The Constitution assumes the president’s conscious, individual assent to a law. —— An autopen, even if authorized, is a mechanical proxy—some argue it’s akin to delegating the decision itself, which the president can’t legally do. • The framers envisioned a hands-on executive role. In 1787, signing meant PEN TO PAPER by the person in question ——no machines existed to complicate this. An autopen might clash with that original understanding. • Legal Authenticity: A signature traditionally proves intent and identity. —— If a machine replicates it, could someone later challenge the law’s validity by claiming the president didn’t truly “sign” it? (LIKE TRUMP IS DOING NOW) • Precedent Concerns: If autopens are okay, what’s next—digital signatures, aides signing, or AI approvals? 🔴 OBAMA and the AUTOPEN • In 2011, there were major concerns amongst constitutional scholars when Obama signed The Patriot Act Extension remotely, while he was in France… 🔴 I BELIEVE DONALD TRUMP WANTS THIS TO GO TO THE SUPREME COURT Expect Donald Trump’s decision to make Joe Biden’s pardons VOID to get smacked down by a corrupt judge first… BUT it will ultimately go to the Supreme Court, and that is exactly where I believe Donald Trump wants it to go. PAY ATTENTION to the ruling’s language of the Supreme Court ruling if and when it comes. The language will determine how far back it applies.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

KABOOOOOOM!!!!💥 President Trump just declared the “Pardons” that were given out via autopen are now VOID! This includes the pardons given out to the J6 Committee, and now they will be under criminal investigation for destroying evidence! Now, think how far back it goes…… https://t.co/Fz8p6d8UfT

View Full Interactive Feed