reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 2:52 AM

@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC

Putin probably https://t.co/N2ilxA7xJt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Learn how to grow mushrooms, use wastewater from Camp Lejeune to fertilize plants, and make breakfast burritos. Dress up as a dragon and distribute brochures for Planned Parenthood at Bass Pro Shop. Watch Scooby Doo while receiving medical treatment. Make hot pockets and sell girl scout cookies at a monster truck rally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna know how to grow your own mushrooms? Wanna learn how to give yourself an animal with wastewater from Camp Lejeune? Wanna learn how to lick mayonnaise out of a gunshot wound? Wanna learn how to make breakfast burritos out of endangered wildlife? Y'all wanna dress up in dragon, pass out brochures for Planned Parenthood at the Bass Pro Shop? You ever watch old reruns of Scooby Doo while getting pegged by a bald midget proctologist with no teeth? Well, learn how to give somebody a Cleveland steamer at a CPAC convention? Y'all wanna learn how to make hot pockets out of the foreskins of your sworn enemies? Y'all wanna dress up finesse less chaps and sell girl scout cookies at a monster truck rally? Wanna learn how to get arrested for indecent exposure at the Popeye's drive through?

@TaTaTacticals - AnonymousMC

https://t.co/SCb0OGmKy8

Video Transcript AI Summary
A drone carrying a large amount of explosives hit the Olenegorsky Gorniak ship, causing significant damage. The drone approached the ship slowly, alarming the Russians. According to a Ukrainian source, the explosive payload weighed almost half a metric ton. It is believed that around 100 Russian soldiers or personnel were on board when the strike occurred.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During payload. This Ukrainian startling images for Russians to wake up to a drone appears to slowly approach the Olenegorsky Gorniak ship. Now a Ukrainian source says that it was hit by this device that carried short of half a metric ton of explosive, a staggering payload, frankly. This Ukrainian source saying that there may have been a 100 Russian soldiers or personnel on board when this struck.
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 1:24 AM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Here we go. Finally have a name for the person who was allegedly behind the bombing of the Nordstream pipeline. Didn’t take long to find that the guy was director of an agency “established with active participation of the CIA” https://t.co/X3OP1FmPxa

Saved - December 15, 2023 at 12:17 AM

@meantweeting1 - Epstein's Sheet. 🧻

Vladimir Putin says the "persecution of President Trump" has exposed the US political system as "Rotten" "They cannot pretend to teach anyone about Democracy. Everything that is happening with Donald Trump in front of the whole world. The whole world sees except Democrat Voters! https://t.co/D9WHEyWYtL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Regarding Trump, in today's conditions, it seems good to me because it exposes the flaws of the American political system. It shows that the system cannot claim to teach others about democracy. What is happening with Trump is purely political, and it is being done in front of the eyes of the American public and the world. They have simply uncovered their internal problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: То что касается при трампа но это конечно для нас то что происходит сегодняшних условиях на мой взгляд это хорошо. Почему? Потому что это показывает все г американской политической системы, которая не может претендовать на то чтобы учить других демократия все что происходит с трамп это п по политическим мотивам своего политического вот что это такое и делается на глазах общественность сша и всего мира они просто об обнаружили свои проблемы внутрь
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 12:38 PM

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

@KimDotcom If people saw this clip of NATO's General Secretary admitting that they deliberately provoked Putin, it would blow their minds. https://t.co/8BpiDTgccC

Video Transcript AI Summary
In autumn 2021, President Putin sent a draft treaty to NATO, requesting a promise to not enlarge the alliance and remove military infrastructure from Central and Eastern Europe. NATO rejected these conditions, leading to Russia's invasion of Ukraine. As a result, NATO has increased its presence in the eastern part of the alliance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what what he sent us. And that was that that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. The opposite happened. He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe. We should remove NATO from that of our alliance introducing some kind of E and B or second class membership. We rejected that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO close to its borders, he has got the exact opposite. He has got more NATO presence in the eastern part of the alliance.
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 12:53 PM

@TaraBull808 - TaraBull

The U.S. government spied on Tucker Carlson to stop him from interviewing Vladamir Putin. https://t.co/6VTQpJhBUf

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was surprised to learn that someone had hacked into my Signal account. It turns out it was the NSA, as they admitted it when they contacted me. They knew about my plans to visit Putin, which I hadn't shared with anyone, not even my family. When I asked how they knew, they explained that they had accessed my text messages with the person I was communicating with. I was shocked by this invasion of privacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say broke into my signal account, which I didn't know they could do. How do how do you know the NSA broke into your signal? Because they admitted it. I got a call from somebody in Washington. It's like, are you planning a trip to go see Putin? And I was like, how would you know that? I haven't told any I mean, anybody. Not my brother, not my wife, nobody. How would you know that? Because NSA pulled your text with this other person you were texting. How did you know?
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 7:11 PM

@karma44921039 - karma

Putin has been warning the world about the US creating biological weapons https://t.co/1qi2XVJqzy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine is accused of conducting military biological programs near the Russian border. They allegedly experimented with dangerous pathogens like coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, and African pig plague. Russia believes this poses a direct threat to their safety. Ukraine and their US allies have denied these claims, but Russia remains convinced and accuses them of trying to cover up the evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Were carrying out military biological programs. They were experimenting with the strains of coronavirus, anthrax, cholera, African pig plague and other deathly lethal pathogens and now they are trying to more puff the evidence of this program, but we have every reason to believe that next to Russia, in Ukraine, next to Russian borders, they were basically creating components for biological weapon and our numerous warrants of that such developments have pose as direct threat to the safety of Russia. They were rejected by Ukraine and by their patrons from the US and they did it in a very brazen way.
Saved - March 23, 2024 at 2:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A captured terrorist in the Russian mall attack discloses receiving 500,000 Rubles to carry out the shooting. He was contacted on Telegram, given the money, instructed where to go, and provided with guns. Some speculate Ukrainian and CIA involvement.

@LaurenWitzkeDE - Lauren Witzke

Captured terrorist involved in the Russian mall attack reveals that he was offered 500,000 Rubles to carry out the shooting. Someone reached out to him on Telegram, deposited the money, told him where to go, and delivered the guns to him and told him to just kill. This has Ukraine and the CIA written all over it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was in Crocus. Who did you shoot? Yes. Whom? Why the punishment? People, please leave him alone. For money. How much money? Around half a million. Half a million what? Half a million rubles. Where did you get it from? Haven't received half of it yet. Where did you receive it? On a card. Where is the card? The card was in the shawl, didn't lose everything. Where did you get the weapons? They got the weapons themselves. How did they find you? Did you look for them or did they find you? No, they wrote to me. Why did they write to you specifically? I don't know, I was in Surukh, there are corners. How come? Did they offer you to kill people just like that? They don't offer anyone to kill people just like that? I learned on Telegram.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Что делал в крокусе? Что застрелил? Да. Кого? Почему наказание? Люди. Оставьте, пожалуйста, его. За деньги. За сколько денег? Где-то полмиллиона. Лмиллиона. Полмиллиона чего? Полмиллиона рублей. От кого получал? Еще не получал половину получат. Где получал? На карту. На карту переводил? Да. Где карта? Карта была шали за все, одежду не успели потерять. Где оружие брали? Оружие они сам достали. Кто они? Не знаю, по телеграмму написали без имени, без имени, без имени, без ничего. А как тебя нашли? Ты сам их искал или они тебя нашли? Нет, они мне написали. А почему они именно тебе написали? Не знаю, я в Сурухе, там уголки. Ну как так? Тебе грузили и предложили просто так убивать людей? Просто так не предлагают никому убивать людей? Я в Телеграме учился.
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 9:18 PM

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

Vladimir Putin Speaks to Country Following Crocus City Hall Massacre – Says ISIS Terrorists Were Attempting to Flee to Ukraine via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/03/vladimir-putin-speaks-country-following-crocus-city-hall/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=vladimir-putin-speaks-country-following-crocus-city-hall

Vladimir Putin Speaks to Country Following Crocus City Hall Massacre - Says ISIS Terrorists Were Attempting to Flee to Ukraine | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft As reported earlier on Friday by Paul Seran, Terrorists attacked a major music venue located in Krasnogorsk, a city in the north-west of the Moscow region, on Friday afternoon. thegatewaypundit.com
Saved - March 24, 2024 at 4:33 PM

@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter

In light of the ISIS attack in Moscow. Let's not forget ISIS was created by CIA plant Barrack Obama and traitor Hillary Clinton. Even the leader of ISIS admitted to being funded by Obama. https://t.co/YIq6dLa3ha

Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran wants to take over Saudi Arabia by burning down the Saudi embassy. They claim the US created ISIS by supporting Mujahideen fighters against the Soviets in Afghanistan. A high-level asset allegedly became president in 2008 to destroy the US from within. The president defunded the military and allegedly funded ISIS through covert operations. An ISIS commander in Pakistan confessed to receiving funds routed through the US to recruit fighters for Syria. The US government has been criticized for indirectly funding terrorist organizations. President Obama requested funds to train Iraqi soldiers and Syrian rebels to fight ISIS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One thing Speaker 1: I see out there just happened today in Tehran. They're burning down the Saudi embassy. You see that. Now what that is is Iran wants to take over Saudi Arabia. They always have. They want the oil. Okay? They've always wanted that. They have a bunch of dishonest people. They've created ISIS. Hillary Clinton created ISIS with Obama. Created with Obama. Speaker 2: You so if you think if we walked away from this, didn't give them money today, it would be worse for us from a security standpoint. Speaker 3: I do. I do. We're building a relationship that just did not exist. I said in our last trip when you were with me that we had a huge trust deficit in part because the United States had to be to be fair, we had helped to create the problem. We're now fighting. How? Because when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, we had this brilliant idea that we were gonna come to Pakistan and create a force of Mujahideen, equip them with Stinger missiles and everything else to go after the Soviets inside Afghanistan. And we were successful. The Soviets left Afghanistan and then we said, great. Goodbye. Leaving these trained people who were fanatical in Afghanistan and Pakistan, leaving them well armed, creating a mess, frankly, that, at the time we didn't really recognize. We were just so happy to see the Soviet Union fall and we thought, okay, fine. We're we're okay now. Everything's gonna be so much better. Now you look back the people we're fighting today we were supporting in the fight against the Soviets. Speaker 1: We also have a history of kind of moving in and out of Pakistan. I mean, let's remember here, the people we are fighting today, we funded 20 years ago. And we did it because we were locked in this struggle with the Soviet Union. They invaded Afghanistan, and we did not wanna see them control Central Asia. And we went to work. Speaker 0: 2008, something unbelievable happened for us in the FBI. We were getting lots of rumors about this high level asset that worked for several intelligence agencies at the same time. He worked for the Saudi intelligence service. He worked for the CIA and he was being developed as a political asset in Chicago, Illinois. He was not even a United States citizen, but it was said that he was a student visa and that he was a national from another country. In 2,008, everyone in the intelligence structure found out who he was. It was this individual whose name I don't like to say, who became president in 2,008 of the United States. Speaker 4: And I will faithfully execute Speaker 5: The office of president of the United States. Speaker 4: The office of president of the United States. Speaker 0: One of his code names was Renegade. His real name was Barry Sortaro, but, he adopted a different name, for his political career. When they ran him for president, the cabal, basically, this was the culmination of so many of their plans for so many years. His mission was to destroy the United States from within, one institution at a time. One of the things he did, of course, was he he defunded our military. He brought down he brought down, the resources that they got, But then he ordered our military in many, many instances and in various theaters to attack our allies and to defend and supply and help our enemies. That's exactly how he created ICE. He would say publicly that the military were gonna bomb our our enemies, but then he would have the military actually bomb, enemies of ISIS, our allies. He gave ISIS funding and equipment, by basically ordering our military to take equipment into a certain theater and then abandon it. And the commanders would say, that's ridiculous. We'll just be handing that stuff over to ISIS. And the president's office would say, don't question orders. Just follow your orders. And that was Speaker 5: Intelligence officials in Pakistan say a local commander from the terrorist network Islamic State has admitted receiving funds transferred via the US. He made the confession while being interrogated. Has the story. Speaker 6: The Pakistani police arrested an ISIS commander, Yousaf al Salafi, and sources told Pakistan's express tribune that the commander confessed to receiving funds routed through the United States to recruit young people to fight in Syria. Asilafi reportedly said he received around $600 for every recruit he sent to Syria and that he was working with the support of an imam. The paper quotes one source saying, the US has been condemning the Islamic State activities, but unfortunately has not been able to stop the funding of these organizations, which is being routed through the US. This report raises so many questions. First of all, is Alsulaifi telling the truth? If he is, does this make US banks complicit in funding tariffs? And another one, were US authorities aware of this? It's no secret that he just a little over a year ago, fighting ISIS was not a priority for the US. Washington was focused on trying to remove Bashar Assad from power. We now hear that president Obama will ask congress for $5,300,000,000 to equip and train Iraqi soldiers and, quote, unquote, moderate Syrian rebels to fight the Islamic State militants. Over the past few years, Washington has been much funding and weapons could end up in the hands of ISIS. Speaker 4: As I've said before, this aspect of our strategy was moving too slowly, but the fall of Ramadi has galvanized the Iraqi government. So with the additional steps I ordered last month, we're speeding up training of ISIL forces, including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province.
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 5:38 AM

@ripped_mask - ripped_mask

The ISIS was created by President Obama, Hillary Clinton, the CIA and Mossad. In the recent years the ISIS is fighting for Israel and Ukraine. #MoscowAttack #WWIII #WW3 https://t.co/MTdyaT1rEl

Saved - March 27, 2024 at 3:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russian Federal Security Service Chief accuses the US, Britain, and Ukraine of being behind the Moscow concert hall attack. Tensions rise as serious allegations are made, with global implications.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

HOLY SHIT… Russian Federal Security Service Chief said today, “the US, Britain, and Ukraine, were behind the Moscow concert hall attack”. Those are serious allegations… with global implications… Regardless of who you think is telling the truth, tensions are high.

Saved - June 2, 2024 at 9:23 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

The CIA is behind all drug epidemics https://t.co/oadMiBQqFK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a former LAPD narcotics detective, accuses the CIA of drug trafficking and presents evidence of CIA involvement in drug operations. Another individual mentions past CIA activities, including assassination attempts and espionage. They question the credibility of the CIA director's denial of such activities in Los Angeles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA's reputation speaks for itself. They are the world's biggest drug cartel. Speaker 1: I am a former Los Angeles police narcotics detective, and I work South Central Los Angeles. And I will tell you director Deutsch emphatically and Thank you. Putting the Speaker 2: to the mic, sir. These mics just don't seem to be. Speaker 1: I I will tell you, director Deutsch, as a former Los Angeles police narcotics detective, that the agency has dealt drugs throughout this country for a long time. Speaker 2: Alright. Alright. Alright. Alright. Alright. Obviously, that is an answer for a lot of you. Now can you please? Speaker 1: I refer Speaker 2: Alright. Now can you please? Speaker 1: I refer direct director Deutsch, I will refer you to 3 specific agency operations known as Amadeus, Pegasus, and Watchtower. I have Watchtower documents heavily redacted by the agency. I was personally exposed to CIA operations and recruited by CIA personnel who attempted to recruit me in the late seventies to become involved in protecting agency drug operations in this country. I have been trying to get this out for 18 years, and I have the evidence. My question for you is very specific, sir. If in the course of the IG's investigations and Fred hits his work, you come across evidence of severely criminal activity Speaker 2: Let him speak in Speaker 1: the and it's classified. Will you use that classification to hide the criminal activity, or will you tell the American people the truth? Speaker 3: If you have information about CIA illegal activity in drugs, you should immediately bring that information to wherever you want, but let me suggest 3 places. The Los Angeles Police Department. Speaker 1: For the record, my name is Mike Rupert, r u p p e r t. I did bring this information out 18 years ago, and I got shot at and forced out of LAPD because of this. I've been on the record for 18 years nonstop, and I'll be happy to give you, congressman, anything that I have. Speaker 2: The gentleman in the beige shirt back there in the back. Speaker 4: My name is James Otis. I'm, currently making a documentary on the CIA, and we're interviewing 7 former agents. 1 was sent down to murder the head of Cuba, Fidel Castro. Another gentleman, colonel Philip Breidinger, was sent down to Guatemala to overthrow the government of Guatemala in 1954. The third agent was actually a spy on Iowa State University campus, where he spied on students, dark skinned students, foreigners, and people from other countries. He was then sent down to Cuba to poison the food supply in Havana, poison the children of Cuba for whatever reason. So we all, I believe, already know this information, mister Deutsch. My question to you is, if we know all of this stuff that the agency has done historically, then why certainly should we believe you today when you say, certainly, this could never happen in in Los Angeles when it's happened all over the world? Speaker 0: Overthrower of Nations.
Saved - January 6, 2025 at 10:27 PM

@BerwickJeff - Jeff Berwick

The two most dangerous terrorist organizations on Earth right now are Israhell and the US/NATO. The US is now labeled a terrorist nation because of the outlawed cluster bombs used to kill innocent children and beachgoers in Crimea, Russia. Expect a reaction from Russia. Ready for WWIII?

@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante

Whether this is all a giant puppet show or not, Putin is spitting truth about the vampiric masquerade of the West's elites. #Putin https://t.co/SDGGfAY8zF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin recently made controversial claims about Western elites, suggesting they've engaged in horrific practices for centuries. While some question his true affiliations, given his past ties to organizations like the World Economic Forum, it's possible he genuinely believes his statements. If that's the case, there's support for his perspective. The idea that Western leaders are involved in sinister activities, including accusations of pedophilia, has gained traction among certain groups. This narrative paints Putin as a figure who appears to understand the darker truths about Western leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very interesting times. And I don't know how recent this is. I think it's fairly recent, but I'm not sure. Vladimir Putin, I just saw this recently, had this to say about basically the western elites. Yeah. The western elites have been filling their babies with the with the flesh of humans for centuries, and it's true. It's incredible. No wonder if if Putin really is not affiliated at all with the globalist types, which I find hard to believe. He was a World Economic Forum, young global leader. A lot of the backing for a lot of the stuff that he did in the in the early days of the fall of the Soviet Union was all CIA backed and stuff like that, but you never know. It is possible that he is actually a real person and really believes all the things he's saying, and this isn't part of some sort of a giant puppet show. It is possible. And if so, I would say I'm definitely a 100% on his side. So for all the people out there you wanna say Jeff's a Russian supporter, in this case, yes. 100%. And he's the only guy who actually seems to know what he's talking about, to know anything at all. And he he knows the truth about a lot of the leaders in the West. They're all satanic pedophile. They eat babies. This is all pretty well known now.
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 7:16 PM

@JzeViewing - Jimbo

Tucker Carlson is CIA https://t.co/IE9nmm6dcf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson has given varied responses regarding his connections to the CIA. He stated that he applied to the CIA as a college senior wanting to work in operations, influenced by his father's friends who were operations officers. He claimed he "had no idea what the CIA was, actually" at the time. Carlson acknowledged his father's work in conjunction with the CIA. According to Alan MacLeod, Carlson's father, Richard Carlson, directed the US Information Agency (USIA) under Ronald Reagan, overseeing Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which the New York Times called a CIA-built "worldwide propaganda network." Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA until the 1970s. Richard Carlson ran Voice of America, essentially the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine, at the height of the Cold War. Carlson now claims to be a "sworn enemy of the CIA." When asked about the Nord Stream pipeline explosion, Carlson denied involvement, but the CIA was implicated. The speaker questions whether it is a coincidence that the son of the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of Voice of Liberty for the CIA is one of the most influential political pundits in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Tucker Carlson is asked about any of his connections to the CIA, he always seems to give a very confusing mix of responses. In an interview with a former member of the CIA, Sean Ryan, he was asked about it. He recounted how everyone around him growing up was in the CIA because his father was. Despite this, he also says that he had no idea what the CIA really was. Speaker 1: You were trying to get into CIA? Yes. Vladimir Putin reminded me. I don't know how he knew that. Yeah. I applied to CIA when I was a senior in college. What did you want to do for the CIA? Operations. Yeah, it was completely different. Completely different organization. Well, who knows what it was, actually? I don't know. I mean, I was operating on the basis of a lot of my father's friends served as operations officers, some really wonderful guys, who I guess I probably shouldn't name, but who were always at our house and were just legit interesting people. So I applied to CIA and that whole application process then, this was 1990, and I should just say, for the record, that I, like, had no idea what the CIA was, actually. And I didn't believe any of the I think Kermit Roosevelt actually lived right down the street from us. Are you kidding? No. Oh, man. That's cool. Speaker 0: This isn't particularly relevant other than this being like a CIA super spy. Kermit Roosevelt Junior is a very famous intelligence officer who worked in the OSS and then the CIA. He was best known for his role in orchestrating the nineteen fifty three coup in Iran. Speaker 1: But I didn't know I mean, but that was just the world you live in in Northwest DC. Like, I didn't I I never thought any of it was bad. And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, Oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with CIA. Mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. I am a sworn enemy of the CIA at this point. No doubt about that. I just wanted a life that was interesting. I wanted to see stuff. Speaker 0: This would all be a lot more believable conspicuous if he hadn't ended up becoming one of the most influential conservative news pundits in American history. Tucker Carlson himself says that he comes from a CIA family and that his father worked for the CIA. Alan MacLeod of Minton Press writes, Richard Carlson is an important journalist and high state official who was appointed by Ronald Reagan as director of the US Information Agency, USIA, which oversees Radio Liberty and Voice of America, which Dick was also the director. Together, these outlets are part of what The New York Times called a worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA. Their goal is to bombard enemy countries with regime change propaganda. Until the nineteen seventies, Radio Free Europe was directly funded by the CIA. Richard Carlson would have been running Voice of America and then the branch of the CIA that oversaw Voice of America at the height of the Cold War, basically the broadcasting wing of the CIA's propaganda machine. Speaker 2: With the backing of CIA, of course, the organization you wanted to join back in the day, as I understand. We should thank God they didn't let you in. Although, it is a serious organization. I understand. My former vis a vis, in the sense that I served in the first main directorate, Soviet Union's intelligence service. Who Speaker 1: blew up Nord Stream? Speaker 2: You for sure. Speaker 1: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you I did not blow up Nord Stream. Speaker 2: Thank you though. You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Is Speaker 0: it a coincidence the former head of the US intelligence agency and director of voice of liberty for the CIA's son is one of the most influential political pundits in America?
Saved - September 16, 2024 at 11:41 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

CIA was paid to mislead the public on Covid. https://t.co/FRwmmZ7k2S

Saved - December 10, 2024 at 1:00 PM

@ksorbs - Kevin Sorbo

The media is the enemy of the people. https://t.co/at9Dxs2YlT

Saved - January 4, 2025 at 1:18 AM

@amuse - @amuse

The CIA targets retarded Americans to attack US interests. https://t.co/oDmudONvZz

Video Transcript AI Summary
You can manipulate situations to provoke a reaction, which we refer to as entrapment or a nudge. By creating specific scenarios, you can trigger someone's impulse to act. This might involve posting something provocative or using a fake profile to elicit a response based on their known history. The goal is to provoke anger or frustration, often through exaggerated or misleading information. Sometimes, the content may not be entirely false but rather embellished to achieve the desired reaction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can kinda put a wooden gel if you know what to do. How? You set them up. You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. We call it a nudge. A nudge. A nudge. Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens. Right? And how does that happen? You put a post out there or or you have some fake profile say something that triggers that we know it's gonna trigger them. Right? Like, we we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about it. So, like, oh, this will piss them off. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow. Nothing like putting up fake social media thing for, like, really good people mad. Mhmm. Post fake news. Sometimes it's Okay. Is it fake? It's embellished a little bit.
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 1:54 AM

@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven

It's very alarming that Russia, Iran and China have infiltrated the US so deeply! Oh wait... https://t.co/2yHbxPhYv2

Saved - January 26, 2025 at 12:39 PM

@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick

Holy Shlit!!! 🚨🚨🚨 Putin: “ the war with Ukraine would never have started if the election had not been stolen from Trump in 2020.” https://t.co/2HBJ4E6O5x

Video Transcript AI Summary
If he had been president and the 2020 election hadn't been perceived as stolen, the Ukrainian crisis that emerged in 2022 might not have occurred.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If he had been, the president, if the victory wasn't stolen from him in 2020, Maybe the Ukrainian crisis that arose in 2022, which was never appeared.
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 4:01 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"In a shocking revelation, Russia's Ministry of Defense (MOD) has accused billionaire Bill Gates of funding "bioterrorism-related activities" with the alleged goal of population reduction." https://t.co/ZM9ItdDAaA

Saved - July 22, 2025 at 4:29 AM

@Glenn_Diesen - Glenn Diesen

The Ukraine War is to a large extent a consequence of the Russiagste hoax https://t.co/XD5Cp3pkKN

Saved - September 9, 2025 at 11:02 PM

@Whiplash437 - Whiplash347

20 CIA and FBI insiders just CONFIRMED that Barack Obama and a former CIA Director orchestrated the entire Russia Hoax — and then hid it in a CIA vault for nearly a DECADE! https://t.co/bnAmrmbVQP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News alert: "the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election." The report states "there is irrefutable evidence ... directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false" and that it promoted "the contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true." Investigators spent "over two thousand hours" interviewing "20 CIA and FBI officials" and found "the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election." It cites "four key elements" and says "there was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations" while noting "senior CIA officials repeatedly refused" but were "overruled by Brennan and Comey." "This is how the Russia hoax was born." "The evidence ... point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. Speaker 1: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. Speaker 0: Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either. Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama. There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and formed the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier. And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed even without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry picked the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, Speaker 1: and Speaker 0: Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Speaker 1: Donald Trump knows, that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2: Putin hated secretary Clinton so much that that the flip side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much. Speaker 3: It was Russia in a very systematic way and tried to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected. Speaker 0: This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference. But like most people expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released. Now if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt? Speaker 1: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump. Speaker 0: Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win? How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's health? Speaker 1: All I have seen is what, the intelligence, committee have reported through their investigation. I think the the the underlying point there is is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as president Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, Speaker 0: they would have released the most damning of that information. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win, but they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted. Speaker 1: Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior? We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents, to the Department of Justice and the FBI, to investigate the criminal implications of this. For even former president Obama? Correct. The evidence that we have found and that Speaker 0: we have Speaker 1: released directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. Speaker 0: Even two years later after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true. And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it. Speaker 4: They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB, actively blocking legislation that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened? Speaker 0: No. I don't know if it's possible to indite a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly. But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to congress. Speaker 5: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier? Speaker 3: I don't. Do you know Speaker 5: if the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any as part of any court filings, applications? Speaker 3: I have no awareness. Speaker 5: Did the CIA rely on it? Speaker 3: No. Why not? Because we we didn't we it wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. It was it was not. Speaker 0: No. That's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability. And it's time for people to pay the price.
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 12:06 PM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

20 CIA and FBI insiders CONFIRMED that Barack Obama and a former CIA Director orchestrated the entire Russia Hoax — and then hid it in a CIA vault for nearly a DECADE! https://t.co/ZFti0iB0i9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News alert: Tulsi Gabbard releases a report alleging a conspiracy by Barack Obama and his intel agencies to sabotage Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of the 2016 election. The report claims irrefutable evidence that Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a narrative that Russia interfered to help Trump win. Gabbard says a House Intel report locked in a CIA vault shows investigators spent over two thousand hours interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials; the Obama administration allegedly doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts; they were siloed; it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in; not coordinated with other agencies. Four elements: Putin wanted Trump to win; Putin took action to help Trump win; Russians had blackmail on Trump (Steele dossier); Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of this was true; senior CIA officials refused; overruled by Brennan and Comey.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert, the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. Speaker 1: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. Speaker 0: Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either. Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama. There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and formed the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier. And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, But they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed, even without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry picked the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, and Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Speaker 1: Donald Trump knows, that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2: Putin hated secretary Clinton so much that that the flip side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much. Speaker 3: It was Russia in a very systematic way, and tried to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected. Speaker 0: This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference. But like most people, expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released. Now if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt? Speaker 1: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump. Speaker 0: Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win? Speaker 4: How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's power? Speaker 1: All I have seen is what the intelligence committee have reported through their investigation. I think the the the underlying point there is is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as president Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, they would have released the most damning of that information. Obama and Speaker 0: his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win. But they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted. Speaker 4: Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior? Speaker 1: We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents, to the Department of Justice and the FBI, to investigate the criminal implications of this. Speaker 4: For even former president Obama? Speaker 1: Correct. The evidence that we have, found and that we have released, directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. Speaker 0: Even two years later after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true. And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it. Speaker 4: They're undermining our alliance, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened? Speaker 0: Now I don't know if it's possible to indite a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly. But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to Congress. Speaker 5: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier? Speaker 3: I don't. Speaker 5: Do you know if the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any as part of any court filings, applications? Speaker 3: I have no awareness. Speaker 5: Did the CIA rely on it? Speaker 3: No. Why not? Because we we didn't it wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence, information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. It was it was not. Speaker 0: No. That's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability. And it's time for people to pay the price.
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 11:31 PM

@OunkaOnX - Ounka

Former CIA Tel Aviv Station Chief admits the truth: The U.S. and Israeli Mossad work hand-in-glove with terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS. They manage it, fund it, and use it to topple governments and counter Iran. https://t.co/0yCGbQxoUk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses working with the Israelis, describing them as “very American” and noting that they could get into shouting matches during meetings over whose idea was best, followed by casual lunch and reconciliation. He emphasizes that Israel is a good ally that the U.S. needs to protect and support, and he asserts that CIA and Al Qaeda had worked closely together in Iraq and in Syria, and that there are times when covert action allowed meetings with the “quote unquote, enemies” to try to bring things down as CIA officers. Speaker 1 adds that most of the world has a problem with Al Qaeda and ISIS/Daesh, but there is less of a problem because the CIA worked with ISIS/Daesh and Al Qaeda. He suggests that if the CIA worked with them, it would be better to understand what they were doing, and if the plan is for the U.S. to work with them on a security agreement, which has been done with enemies before, then this has been done in concert with diplomats and other countries involved. He indicates he wouldn’t be surprised if that was happening and would call it possibly hopeful. Speaker 0 continues by noting that newspapers in the United States once celebrated Qasem Soleimani as a fighter with American troops against ISIS and Al Qaeda. He states that Soleimani “was, and now it's switched,” implying a shift in perception or policy. The overarching theme is the idea of collaboration or coordination with hostile or extremist groups in pursuit of broader strategic objectives, including countering Iran, and the possibility that such collaborations could be framed as necessary or hopeful within a complex web of alliances and covert actions. Speaker 0 ends by reiterating the shift in stance: “Now we have to go to al ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against Iran.” This underscores a cyclical or ironic pivot in U.S. strategy, moving from partnering with certain adversaries against common threats to reengaging those same groups to counter another adversary. The dialogue presents a candid view of realpolitik, suggesting that relationships with seemingly incompatible actors and shifts in alliances occur as part of broader geopolitical objectives, with collaboration sometimes described as acceptable when it serves strategic goals, and public narratives sometimes contrasting with behind-the-scenes actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now we have to go to al ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against, Iran. What I loved about working with the Israelis is they're very American. We could get into shouting matches during meetings sometimes. Not like we're super mad, but we're trying to really say, but my idea is best. When my idea is best kind of thing. And then we'd be like, hey. You wanna go have lunch? And we're all fine. You know? It was just a really it it's a really nice place to work. They're good allies of ours. We need to protect them. I do know for a fact that that we argue sometimes with them, but I also know for a fact that we're committed to helping protect them, keep their state. You mean CIA and Al Qaeda worked closely together in Iraq. Speaker 1: And Syria. And And in Syria to overthrow Assad, of course. Speaker 0: It's it's overthrow Assad and stuff like that. There were times when our covert action would allow us findings would allow us to go and actually have meetings and talk to the, quote unquote, enemies to try to bring things down as CIA officers. Speaker 1: Everyone, most of the world, has a problem with Al Qaeda and ISIS Daesh. Right. Right. You have less of a problem because the CIA worked with ISIS Daesh and al and Al Qaeda. Speaker 0: If we worked with them, we would know what they were doing better, that's for sure, and understand it. If the plan is for us to work with them, to work on a security agreement, which we have done with enemies before, and we've played that part as long as well as side by side with the diplomats, honestly, and whatever other countries are involved. And so I wouldn't be surprised if that was happening, and I would call it possibly hopeful. Speaker 1: In fact, that is why the newspapers once in The United States celebrated Qasem Soleimani, the as a fighter with the American troops against ISIS and Al Qaeda. Speaker 0: He was, and now it's switched. Now we have to go to als ISIS and Al Qaeda to go back against Iran.
Saved - February 2, 2026 at 11:25 PM

@Jvnior - Jvnior

Putin: "The West is being run by jewish satanic pedophiles. They want to normalize pedophilia.” https://t.co/FyzeoszZc6

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are increasingly aggressive information attacks against us, targeting primarily the young generations. They constantly lie, distort historical facts, and continue attacks on our culture, on the Russian Orthodox Church, and on other traditional religious organizations in our country. Look at what they do with their own peoples: the destruction of the family, of cultural and national identity, distortions, and mockery of children up to pedophilia being declared the norm in their life. Clergy are compelled to bless same-sex marriages. To hell with them, let them do whatever they want. What would I like to say here? Adults have the right to live as they want. This is how we have always treated it in Russia, and this is how we will continue to treat it. No one will intrude into private life, and we do not intend to do so. I want to say to them: look, forgive me, Sacred Scripture, the main books of all other world religions. There it is written, including that the family is a union of a man and a woman.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Поэтому ведут против нас всё более агрессивные информационные атаки. Целью выбирают прежде всего, конечно, молодых людей, молодые поколения, и здесь опять лгут постоянно: извращают исторические факты, не прекращают нападки на нашу культуру, на Русскую Православную Церковь, другие традиционные религиозные организации нашей страны. Посмотрите, что они делают со своими собственными народами: разрушение семьи, культурной и национальной идентичности, извращения, издевательства над детьми вплоть до педофилии объявляются нормой их жизни. Священнослужителей принуждают благословлять однополые браки. Да бог с ними, пускай что хотят, то и делают. Что здесь хочется сказать? Взрослые люди имеют право жить как хотят. Мы к этому так и относились в России. Всегда как к этому будем так относиться? Никто в частную жизнь не вторгается, и мы не собираемся этого делать. Хочется им сказать: посмотрите, извините меня, Священное Писание, главные книги всех других мировых религий. Там все сказано, в том числе то, что семья это союз мужчины и женщины.
View Full Interactive Feed