TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 11, 2023 at 4:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The origin of oil has been a topic of controversy for decades. While the consensus among scientists is that it is biotic, there is evidence to suggest that it may be abiotic. The theory of abiotic oil suggests that it is formed from non-biological sources deep within the earth. This theory was first proposed by Russian scientist Mikhailo Lomonosov in 1757 and has gained traction in recent years. Despite this, there is a lack of scientific literature supporting the biotic origin of oil. The implications of the true origin of oil are significant, as it is the world's most valuable commodity and has a major impact on global politics and economics. In a world full of complexity and beauty, it's important to focus on positivity. However, we must also be aware of those in power who may not have our best interests at heart. The term "conspiracy theorist" was created to discredit those who question authority. The ancient Greeks believed in the power of empathy and fear in theater, a concept known as catharsis. Today, we must be conscious of the cognitive war being waged against us and the importance of mastering technology. Let's also be aware of the potential dangers of certain vaccines and hold those responsible accountable. Discover the fascinating world of cymatics with millions of views on YouTube. Explore the connections between geometric shapes and different layers of reality. Relax with soothing music and become more conscious. Learn about ancient Khazars and their link to the Rothschild dynasty. Uncover the truth about the depopulation plan and the COVID-19 pandemic. Understand the future of communication with 6G technology. Finally, discover the reptilian base that has been manipulating humans for years. For 5,000 years, a base off the coast of the Middle East has emitted high-frequency sonic vibrations inducing fear, anger, and aggression in the region. The Reptilians use this to control the population. The Council of Andromeda destroyed the base in 2011, but the Reptilians continue to use similar bases in the area. The Council aims to remove these bases to prevent a nuclear war. A certain population is ready to accept a digital totalitarian regime, so it's important to spread awareness of the manipulation behind the COVID pandemic. The true origin of oil is also significant in this context, as it has a major impact on global politics and economics. We must be conscious of those in power who may not have our best interests at heart and hold them accountable. Let's focus on positivity, but also be aware of the potential dangers and manipulation in our world.

@alainsebil - alainseb

“Dans un monde de mensonge universel, dire la vérité est un acte révolutionnaire.” — George Orwell –

@alainsebil - alainseb

Nota : Je ne fais jamais un article ou une annonce importante sans avoir fait une longue recherche avec des références. Mes articles sont tous trop riches en références et indigestes donc. Alain Sebilleau https://lesmoutonsenrages.fr/author/alaseb/

alaseb – Les moutons enragés lesmoutonsenrages.fr

@alainsebil - alainseb

https://resistance71.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/tout-ce-que-vous-avez-toujours-voulu-savoir-sur-le-petrole-abiotique/ Extraits :

Tout ce que vous avez toujours voulu savoir sur le pétrole (abiotique)… Biotique ou abiotique: La vraie-fausse crise pétrolière ou la pseudo-science au service du contrôle énergétique par scarcité induite – 1ère partie --   Par Résistance 71   2ème Partie 3 ème partie  4ème partie 5ème partie 6ème partie   “Dans un monde de mensonge universel, dire la vérité est un acte révolutionnaire.” -- George Orwell… resistance71.wordpress.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

...En 1951, le Professeur Nikolaï Kudryavtsev annonça les résultats des recherches soviétiques par son académie des sciences en énonçant la “théorie russo-ukrainienne de l’origine profonde et abiotique du pétrole”.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Trés vite, d’autres professeurs à la pointe des sciences concernées tels les professeurs Kropotkin, Dolenko, Shakhvarstova, Linetskii, Porfir’yev et Anikiev rejoignirent les conclusions du professeur Kudryavtsev.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Depuis cette période, l’URSS et maintenant la Russie, est devenue progressivement le plus gros producteur et exportateur de pétrole au monde.

@alainsebil - alainseb

La suggestion que le pétrole puisse être dérivé d’une sorte de transformation de poisson compressé ou de détritus biologique est certainement la notion la plus idiote qui a été entretenue par un nombre substantiel de personnes pendant un laps de temps étendu. ” Fred Hoyle (1982)

@alainsebil - alainseb

“Il n’y a jamais eu d’observations faites d’une génération spontanée de pétrole naturel (pétrole brut) à partir de matière biologique à basse pression dans quelque laboratoire que ce soit, où que ce soit, jamais.” — J.F. Kenney —

@alainsebil - alainseb

Document à lire de J. F. Kenney : https://www-gasresources-net.translate.goog/introduction.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… ... Une fois de plus, le pétrole et ses aléas viennent troubler la vie quotidienne des citoyens de France et d’ailleurs. https://www-gasresources-net.translate.goog/introduction.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en ...

Google Translate www-gasresources-net.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

Le pétrole est de fait la véritable monnaie d’échange du monde, bien au-delà des valeurs aléatoires des monnaies de singe utilisées pour les transactions globales. Qu’est-ce donc que cet or noir ? D’où provient-il ? Quelles conséquences a t’il sur nos vies et le monde ?

@alainsebil - alainseb

La science sur laquelle est basée notre concept économique et d’exploitation du produit est-elle correcte ? Le but de cet article est de montrer qu’il y a plus à penser que ce qu’on nous demande de croire et que la thèse consensuelle de la science sur l’origine biologique du

@alainsebil - alainseb

pétrole est scientifiquement invalidée, que cela n’est pas dû à une “erreur”, mais bien volontaire et ce à des fins de contrôle des ressources énergétiques et de ses prix. Cette hypothèse a été émise en 1757 par le savant russe Mikhailo Lomonosov.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Nous avons donc cherché une littérature scientifique concernant cette hypothèse, ainsi qu’une littérature scientifique prouvant l’origine biologique (ou biotique) du pétrole.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Nous pourrions penser que comme cette théorie est la théorie avancée de nos jours par l’ensemble de la science spécialisée dans le sujet de la recherche et de la production pétrolière, nous ne devrions pas éprouver en conséquence une quelconque difficulté à trouver une

@alainsebil - alainseb

littérature scientifique riche et abondante corroborant ce fait… Quelle ne fut pas notre surprise de constater que non seulement il était difficile de trouver des articles scientifiques prouvant l’origine biotique du pétrole, mais encore que

@alainsebil - alainseb

Nous avons cherché sur un nombre important de moteurs de recherche en anglais et en français, nous avons épluché “google scholar”, en vain. Ceux-ci n’existaient pas !

@alainsebil - alainseb

Chose même anecdotiquement extraordinaire, mais qui mérite néanmoins d’être mentionné, lorsque nous avons tapé à plusieurs reprises les mots de recherche suivants sur Google: “scientific articles biotic origin oil”, Google lista à plusieurs reprises

@alainsebil - alainseb

une liste d’articles n’ayant rien à voir avec le sujet demandé ou des articles connectant l’origine “biotique” à des domaines économiques et en haut de page figurait la question suivante : “did you mean scientific articles abiotic origin oil” à savoir: “vouliez-vous dire articles

@alainsebil - alainseb

scientifiques sur l’origine abiotique (donc non organique) du pétrole” ? Ce qui peut-être interprété de deux façons à notre sens: soit “nous n’avons rien sur l’origine biologique du pétrole mais nous avons sur son origine abiologique / abiotique” ou encore “de quoi voulez-vous

@alainsebil - alainseb

parler?.. Il est évident que le pétrole est biotique, vouliez-vous des preuves concernant l’origine abiotique ?” Donnons à Google le bénéfice du doute…

@alainsebil - alainseb

En revanche, la littérature scientifique concernant une origine abiotique, non biologique donc, du pétrole était abondante et cela nous a intrigué.

@alainsebil - alainseb

En tapant les termes suivants sur Google: “biotic origin oil” simple recherche sur une “origine biotique (ou biologique) du pétrole”, six sur les 10 premiers articles sortant sont à propos de l’origine abiotique du pétrole (non-biologique), les quatre restants étant à propos de

@alainsebil - alainseb

la “controverse sur l’origine biotique ou abiotique du pétrole”. Rien sur ce que nous demandions : des articles sur l’origine biotique du pétrole… De plus en plus troublant.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Wikipedia est de plus assez prolixe sur le sujet de l’origine abiotique du pétrole en déclarant d’entrée de jeu que “la théorie abiotique de l’origine du pétrole a été discréditée”, tiens donc… Donc, nous tapons dans la fenêtre de recherche interne de Wikipedia les termes

@alainsebil - alainseb

“biotic origin petroleum” (puisque la terminologie de Wikipedia concernant le pétrole en anglais est “petroleum” et non pas “oil” ce qui est plus spécifique convenons-en), or que découvrons-nous avec stupeur? Qu’il n’y a pas de page sur Wikipedia concernant une...

@alainsebil - alainseb

origine biologique / biotique du pétrole. Intrigant non lorsqu’il s’agit de fait de la théorie du “consensus scientifique” à cet égard ? ... Lisez ici : https://resistance71.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/tout-ce-que-vous-avez-toujours-voulu-savoir-sur-le-petrole-abiotique/

Tout ce que vous avez toujours voulu savoir sur le pétrole (abiotique)… Biotique ou abiotique: La vraie-fausse crise pétrolière ou la pseudo-science au service du contrôle énergétique par scarcité induite – 1ère partie --   Par Résistance 71   2ème Partie 3 ème partie  4ème partie 5ème partie 6ème partie   “Dans un monde de mensonge universel, dire la vérité est un acte révolutionnaire.” -- George Orwell… resistance71.wordpress.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

Explication tres claire sur Youtube par le Colonel Fletcher Prouty : https://youtube.com/watch?v=zSff0pwc1Xc… Col. Prouty spent 9 of his 23-year military career in the Pentagon (1955-1964): 2 years with the Secretary of Defense, 2 years with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 5 years withU.S. AirF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSff0pwc1Xc Col.

@alainsebil - alainseb

525,176 views 20 Aug 2018 Col. Prouty spent 9 of his 23-year military career in the Pentagon (1955-1964): 2 years with the Secretary of Defense, 2 years with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and 5 years with Headquarters, U.S. Air Force. In 1955 he was appointed the first

@alainsebil - alainseb

"Focal Point" officer between the CIA and the Air Force for Clandestine Operations per National Security Council Directive 5412. He was Briefing Officer for the Secretary of Defense (1960-1961), and for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. You can start by searching the

@alainsebil - alainseb

words "abiotic oil." This will lead you to an enormous amount of literature and other materials on the subject. To cut to the chase, you can do a search for the two books written by Jerome Corsi ("Black Gold Stranglehold" and "The Great Oil Conspiracy"), and the book by Thomas 6

@alainsebil - alainseb

Gold "The Deep Hot Biosphere." A couple of videos on the subject are: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr42BP3wvOw https://vimeo.com/39213094

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-015-@) Cancers fulgurants et surtout multiples. Ceci n'existait pas avant. Manipulation génétique. Re-écoutons/lisons le Pr Montagnier après Mr Peronne

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-016-@) Le Pr Montagnier présume que tout converge vers des manipulations de laboratoire avec un double objectif de conception de vaccins et virus a gain fonction Extraits de la conclusion: … À travers les 14 faits relatifs à chacun des 14 paragraphes de cet article, tout

@alainsebil - alainseb

converge vers de possibles manipulations de laboratoire (note de fin ci-dessous) qui ont contribué à modifier le génome du COVID_19, mais aussi, très probablement du SRAS beaucoup plus ancien, avec peut-être ce double objectif de conception de vaccins et de « gain de fonction »

@alainsebil - alainseb

en termes de pénétration de ce virus dans la cellule… …Cette analyse, réalisée in silico, est dédiée aux véritables auteurs du Coronavirus COVID-19. Il ne tient qu’à eux de décrire leurs propres expériences et pourquoi elles se sont transformées en un désastre mondial :

@alainsebil - alainseb

650 000 vies (le 26 juillet 2020), soit plus que celles prises par les deux bombes atomiques d’Hiroshima et de Nagasaki. Nous, les survivants, devrions tirer les leçons de cette grave alerte pour l’avenir de l’humanité. Nous demandons instamment à nos collègues scientifiques et

@alainsebil - alainseb

médecins de respecter les règles éthiques telles qu’exprimées par le serment d’Hippocrate : ne pas nuire, jamais et jamais !… Conclusions en bas de page de la sauvegarde de cette étude : https://resistance-mondiale.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/editor-20-ijrg20-b07-3568.pdf ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ https://resistance-mondiale.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/editor-20-ijrg20-b07-3568.pdf

GACOR777: SITUS LOGIN LINK SLOT MAHJONG WAYS 2 TERBARU HARI INI GACOR777 adalah situs terbaru yang menawarkan akses login link untuk permainan slot Mahjong Ways 2. Dengan desain yang modern dan antarmuka yang user-friendly, GACOR777 menyediakan pengalaman bermain yang menyenangkan bagi para pemainnya. premium.norn.co.jp

@alainsebil - alainseb

Fil de discussion de Christine Cotton sur les cancers foudroyants du 29 Juin 2022. 1500 reponses :

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-017-@) L’Histoire de la Mafia Kazhare (KM) Cette lecture est un “must”... Elle permet de mieux comprendre ce qui se passe en Ukraine et les autres crises. Pour comprendre le présent et anticiper, il faut connaitre notre vraie Histoire https://qactus.fr/2022/09/24/rothschild-lhistoire-cachee-de-la-mafia-khazare-diabolique-enfin-devoilee/ https://qactus.fr/2022/09/24/rothschild-lhistoire-cachee-de-la-mafia-khazare-diabolique-enfin-devoilee/

Rothschild : L’histoire cachée de la mafia khazare diabolique enfin dévoilée. L'histoire cachée de la mafia khazare diabolique. Première partie Seconde partie Cet article est maintenant disponible, et si vous n'avez jamais su "l'histoire cachée de la mafia khazare diabolique" elle est enfin dévoilée, là voici maintenant publique. Cet article est long, mais leur histoire aussi et va de pair avec cette longue diabolisation organisé, vous… qactus.fr

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-018-@) LA TREIZIÈME TRIBU prouve sans aucun doute que les Juifs modernes ne sont pas des Israélites bibliques. La mascarade du « peuple élu » des Juifs est-elle enfin terminée ? L'ADN le prouve. Sont-ils le "peuple élu" de Dieu ? …https://www-biblebelievers-org-au.translate.goog/13trindx.htm?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… https://www-biblebelievers-org-au.translate.goog/13trindx.htm?_x_tr_sch=http&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en

Google Translate www-biblebelievers-org-au.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-019-@) Comment les "maçons" construisent et prennent le contrôle de notre société... Document rare en roumain en 12 Chapitres... Très explicite, traduit en français… https://www-fortasigratie-ro.translate.goog/realitati-contemporane/masoneria/tehnologia-folosita-distructiv-de-masonerie-vaccinurile-otravitoare.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… https://www-fortasigratie-ro.translate.goog/realitati-contemporane/masoneria/tehnologia-folosita-distructiv-de-masonerie-vaccinurile-otravitoare.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en

Tehnologia folosita distructiv de Masonerie. Vaccinurile otravitoare. Suprimarea tehnologiilor revolutionare si folosirea lor in scop de control si dominatie www-fortasigratie-ro.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

Kim Dotcom ... Les GAFAM sont co-conspirateurs dans certains des plus grands crimes contre l'Humanité...

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft have betrayed you. To protect their monopolies they sold you out to the deep state. Their products and services are used to spy on you and to manipulate you. Big Tech are co-conspirators in some of the biggest crimes against humanity.

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-021-@) On parlera des "zelites" un autre jour.. Parlons de belles choses positives... Ce monde est beaucoup plus riche, complexe et beau... Levons les voiles et créons ce nouveau monde. Une belle vidéo (épinglée) sur mon mur VK Lois sacrées de la Nature https://vk.com/alainseb

VK.com | VK m.vk.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-022-@) Quelle est la personne qui doit contrôler que Mr Fauci se comporte de manière éthique comme, par exemple : ne pas rendre très dangereux par GoF (Gain de fonction) une "chimère à injecter" (vaccin).... ??? C'est sa femme : Christine Grady

@CarineSebal - La vérité triomphera !

@abdelmadjidAgg2 @BeaLor81 Et qui est soit disant la pour encadrer Fauci sa femme gros conflit d intérêt

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-023-@) Être ou ne pas être complotiste ? Telle est la question ! Ariane Bilheran, psychologue Complotiste est un terme créé par la CIA pour se protéger des éveillés qui pensaient que la CIA a fait tuer JFK… Les éveillés avaient raison... Les éveillés, ceux qui doutent,

@alainsebil - alainseb

sentent, ceux qui ont un peu d’information et se mettent à chercher… sont aussi appelés des prévisionnistes (ou spoiler) car ils s'informent et après informe avant tout le monde… Être ou ne pas être complotiste ? Telle est la question ! Ariane Bilheran, psychologue

@alainsebil - alainseb

https://vk.com/@b.geffard-tre-ou-ne-pas-tre-complotiste-telle-est-la-question-ariane-b… ... La manipulation par la crainte et la pitié L’humain produit comme émotions les plus puissantes ce que les Grecs anciens nommaient « la pitié » (entendre, l’empathie) et « la crainte » (la terreur). S’il n’y a pas de théâtre pour les expulser, alors https://vk.com/@b.geffard-tre-ou-ne-pas-tre-complotiste-telle-est-la-question-ariane-b ...

Être ou ne pas être complotiste ? Telle est la question ! Ariane Bilheran, psychologue Par : Ariane Bilheran m.vk.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

nous les expulserons dans le théâtre de la « vraie vie » et les masses seront manipulées de cette façon. Car le théâtre, c'est le jeu, et le jeu permet de créer des frontières entre le dedans et le dehors, et, précisément, de ne pas jouer dans le réel la scène fantasmée.

@alainsebil - alainseb

C’est pour cela que le théâtre, chez les Athéniens, était un devoir citoyen : assister à une tragédie d’Eschyle ou d’Euripide revêtait la fonction citoyenne d’expulser ce trop-plein d’émotion, d’empathie et de terreur, par identification au héros, dont Racine nous disait qu’il

@alainsebil - alainseb

devait, pour que l’identification opère correctement, être « mi-coupable, mi-innocent » (Préface de Phèdre). Les Anciens l’avaient parfaitement théorisé, sous l’angle de la « catharsis » conceptualisée par Aristote. Ne nous étonnons pas que les Lettres Classiques soient désormais

@alainsebil - alainseb

reléguées au rang d’enseignement pauvre de la «République » (le CAPES de lettres classiques ayant été supprimé, il était donc bien dans le projet de supprimer l’enseignement du latin et du grec) : il y a, dans le savoir des Anciens, dans la philosophie antique, des trésors de

@alainsebil - alainseb

compréhension et d’entendement qu’il est désormais malvenu d’enseigner, de transmettre et de connaître. De tout temps, ceux qui ont désiré exercer un pouvoir sur les peuples n’ont jamais été de gentils agneaux. Et jamais le loup ne vous avertira qu’il est un loup !

@alainsebil - alainseb

L’acculturation des masses fait partie du projet d’aliénation, et les individus doivent être conscients de cela. Tout ce qui concourt à développer la subjectivité, l’imaginaire, la symbolisation, l’art, la culture, la pensée sera honni des pouvoirs d’essence totalitaire. Parfois

@alainsebil - alainseb

, il existe des gouvernants intègres, qui servent l’idéal plutôt que leurs ambitions personnelles, mais ceci est extrêmement rare. Rare, parce que ceux qui désirent exercer un pouvoir pathogène sur les peuples ne leur permettent pas d’exercer longtemps le pouvoir (assassinats,

@alainsebil - alainseb

meurtres déguisés en suicides, disqualification médiatique…) Rare aussi, car, comme le disait Platon, ceux qui seraient les plus compétents et les plus sages pour exercer le pouvoir ne désirent précisément pas cette fonction.

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-024-@) Important : les suspendus La France est le dernier pays à ne pas reconnaitre cette erreur. Idée avec média : Pourrait-on porter un badge jaune sur notre poitrine où il y aurait marqué : "Pour du soleil et pour le retour des suspendus" https://twitter.com/BelmehelZine/status/1607844749087739904

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-025-@) Message plein d'amour à tous les éveillés, résistants... soucieux de l'Humanité https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Jvo65qfHQ&feature=youtu.be.

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-026-@) Le Documentaire « Guerre silencieuse » montre comment, les USA ont choisi de mener une guerre économique ultraviolente et déloyale contre l'Europe en recourant à la manipulation et à l'espionnage. Une ultraviolence qui ne dit pas son nom.

@Fleur50559050 - Elsa

2/ https://reseauinternational.net/guerre-silencieuse-une-ultraviolence-qui-ne-dit-pas-son-nom/ via https://t.me/RI_ReseauInternational/7765

« Guerre silencieuse » : Une ultraviolence qui ne dit pas son nom Le documentaire « Guerre silencieuse » montre comment, les États-Unis ont choisi de mener une guerre économique ultraviolente et déloyale contre l'Europe en recourant à la manipulation et à l'espionnage. reseauinternational.net
Réseau International (officiel) « Guerre silencieuse » : Une ultraviolence qui ne dit pas son nom Le documentaire « Guerre silencieuse » montre comment, les #ÉtatsUnis ont choisi de mener une #guerreéconomique ultraviolente et déloyale contre l'#Europe en recourant à la #manipulation et à l'#espionnage. https://reseauinternational.net/guerre-silencieuse-une-ultraviolence-qui-ne-dit-pas-son-nom/ t.me

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-026-@) Jacques Attali décrit le plan des élites illuminati pour le 21e siècle https://numidia-liberum.blogspot.com/2019/01/jacques-attali-decrit-le-plan-des.html Dans un livre que Henry Kissinger a qualifié de "brillant et provocateur… difficile à rejeter", Jacques Attali confirme que les banquiers Illuminati imposent à https://numidia-liberum.blogspot.com/2019/01/jacques-attali-decrit-le-plan-des.html Dans

Jacques Attali décrit le plan des élites illuminati pour le 21e siècle Dans un livre que Henry Kissinger a qualifié de " brillant et provocateur ... difficile à rejeter ", Jacques Attali confirme que les b... numidia-liberum.blogspot.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

l'Humanité, un affreux "Nouveau Monde", opposé au bien, à la vérité ou à la réalité. Ce Nouvel Ordre Mondial est en cours de formation sous nos yeux, et que nous en sommes inconscients.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Dans « Une brève histoire de l’avenir » Attali parle en tant qu’initié illuminati, il a par conséquent accès aux plans de ces derniers concernant la planète terre. Il ne parle pas dans le vide. Voici quelques thèmes pour vous donner une idée du livre....

@alainsebil - alainseb

@threadreaderapp unroll

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-028-@) Je recommande : https://youtube.com/watch?v=TyYd4sqpPKo… Idriss Aberkane. "... l'expert internationalement reconnu en MagnétoHydroDynamique (MHD) Jean-Pierre Petit nous donne son point de vue sur leur potentiel industriel Une des meilleures interviews jamais publiée sur ma chaîne..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyYd4sqpPKo Idriss

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-029-@) Bonjour. Je viens de lire "Au-delà de l'impossible" de Didier van Cauwelaert. C'est mon plus beau livre. Nikola Tesla s'adresse à l'humanité et passe des informations... Et il a choisi une medium française et un écrivain/chercheur renommé https://www.didiervancauwelaert.fr/livres/au-dela-de-limpossible/

AU-DELÀ DE L’IMPOSSIBLE - Didier van Cauwelaert Plon et J’ai Lu  Et si nous avions la preuve que la conscience, après la mort, continue à transmettre des sentiments et de l’information? Et si cette preuve nous était apportée par deux des plus grands génies de la science, Albert Einstein et Nikola Tesla ? C’est l’incroyable aventure dans laquelle s’est trouvé plongé Didier … AU-DELÀ DE L’IMPOSSIBLE Lire la suite » didiervancauwelaert.fr

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-030-@) LA GUERRE COGNITIVE DU MONDIALISME AVEC STANISLAS BERTON. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S0GOWxIhS9k&t=2s

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-031-@) Dans la pyramide de contrôle de ce monde, les sociétés secrètes (pour le peuple)… Les illuminati et consorts https://alainseb.substack.com/p/du-controle-de-ce-monde?

Du contrôle de ce monde Article traduit de Michel Duchaine alainseb.substack.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-032-@) Bonjour Nous allons peut-être voir du mouvement pour arrêter les plans mondiaux de Pfizer et consorts... Les Thaïlandais ont un très grand respect pour la famille royale... https://twitter.com/davidicke/status/1622302424294629385 En Thaïlande tout dommages corporels tels que les accidents de... En

@davidicke - David Icke

The narrative is collapsing: Thailand royalty BOMBSHELL for Pfizer over princess coma https://davidicke.com/2023/02/05/the-narrative-is-collapsing-thailand-royalty-bombshell-for-pfizer-over-princess-coma/

The narrative is collapsing: Thailand royalty BOMBSHELL for Pfizer over princess coma A few days after receiving her booster injection, the Thai princess suddenly collapsed. Three weeks later she remains in a coma. The Thai Royal Family was just informed that the initial bacterial infection diagnosis was in fact always untrue; thus, from the very start there was a coordinated coverup by the BigPharma captured authorities. The Thai king is finally making the connections that Pfizer's mRNA vaccine is a slow kill bioweapon. He will be declaring the Pfizer contract null and void due to fraud, which will result in the stripping away of all immunity. Read more: The narrative is collapsing: Thailand royalty BOMBSHELL for Pfizer over princess coma [trap-banner] [perc-banner] davidicke.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

voiture, problèmes cliniques, etc... se règlent en argent et rapidement... 3 millions de dollars étaient prévus pour les éventuels dommages avec vaccins ou autres problèmes médicaux... 45 millions de dollars ont déjà été dépensés... Et ce n'est pas fini...

@alainsebil - alainseb

Quelques jours après avoir reçu son injection de rappel, la princesse thaïlandaise s'est "soudainement" effondrée. Trois semaines plus tard, elle est toujours dans le coma. La famille royale thaïlandaise vient d'être informée que le diagnostic initial d'"infection bactérienne"

@alainsebil - alainseb

était en fait toujours erroné ; il y a donc eu dès le départ une dissimulation coordonnée par les autorités capturées par BigPharma. Le roi de Thaïlande a enfin compris que le "vaccin" à ARNm de Pfizer est une arme biologique à action lente.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Il va déclarer le contrat de Pfizer nul et non avenu pour cause de fraude, ce qui entraînera la suppression de toute immunité. Lire la suite : Le récit s'effondre : La royauté thaïlandaise fait un scandale à Pfizer à propos du coma de la princesse.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Les thaïs se sont promis de faire rembourser les vaccins et de faire payer les dommages par Pfizer… Faites confiance aux thaïs… Car là, ils ont touché au sacré. https://davidicke-com.translate.goog/2023/02/05/the-narrative-is-collapsing-thailand-royalty-bombshell-for-pfizer-over-princess-coma/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… Appelons un chat un chat : Quand est-ce que ce génocide s’arrêtera-t-il ? A ReTweet svp https://davidicke-com.translate.goog/2023/02/05/the-narrative-is-collapsing-thailand-royalty-bombshell-for-pfizer-over-princess-coma/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en Appelons

The narrative is collapsing: Thailand royalty BOMBSHELL for Pfizer over princess coma A few days after receiving her booster injection, the Thai princess suddenly collapsed. Three weeks later she remains in a coma. The Thai Royal Family was just informed that the initial bacterial infection diagnosis was in fact always untrue; thus, from the very start there was a coordinated coverup by the BigPharma captured authorities. The Thai king is finally making the connections that Pfizer's mRNA vaccine is a slow kill bioweapon. He will be declaring the Pfizer contract null and void due to fraud, which will result in the stripping away of all immunity. Read more: The narrative is collapsing: Thailand royalty BOMBSHELL for Pfizer over princess coma [trap-banner] [perc-banner] davidicke-com.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-033-@) IMPORTANT La chute de la Cabale Documentaire où l’on parle de choses peu connues comme les Illuminati. Mes archives : https://t.me/infosetplus/ https://lesmoutonsenrages.fr/author/alaseb/ https://alainseb.substack.com https://odysee.com/@s1fdltd:e https://vk.com/alainseb https://t.me/infosetplus/ https://lesmoutonsenrages.fr/author/alaseb/ https://alainseb.substack.com/ https://odysee.com/@s1fdltd:e https://vk.com/alainseb https://odysee.com/@PhilippeBirien:9/DOC-La-suite-de-la-Chute-de-la-Cabale--(01-à-17)--16.9:0?lid=607692d625b89d5e3cb83179085db87d79af347e

Quelquesinfos NOM t.me
alaseb – Les moutons enragés lesmoutonsenrages.fr
alainseb’s Newsletter | Quelques infos | Substack Some news not well known use web site translator for other language than french: https://www.ipvoid.com/website-translation-tool/. Click to read alainseb’s Newsletter, by Quelques infos, a Substack publication. Launched 8 months ago. alainseb.substack.com
@s1fdltd View @s1fdltd on Odysee odysee.com
VK.com | VK m.vk.com
La suite de la Chute de la Cabale VF 1 à 17 Vous pouvez augmenter la visibilité de cette vidéo en contribuant, via l'onglet "soutien". 🙏❤️, la chaîne n'est pas monétisée. 👉 Lien d'invitation de ma chaîne: https://odysee.com/$/invite/@PhilippeBi... odysee.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-034-@) La maitrise des outils informatiques jusqu'à l'Intelligence Artificielle est importante pour cette guerre de l'information et de "prise du cerveau"... C'est un appel a tous ceux qui veulent agir pour aider l'Humanité

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-035-@) Que doivent faire les peuples face à l’émergence des drones policiers? Idriss Aberkanne https://www.youtube.com/shorts/8fGiyRGCvas

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-036-@) C’est le WE, on se repose… Peut-être avec une très belle chaine de films Ca commence par la Belle verte vers la SF… https://odysee.com/@moutonsnoirs-filmsets%C3%A9ries:e?view=content… Recommandation… car je n’ai compris que 70%… Vortex… Aube de la souveraineté… Film prophétique francais… En 2057 https://odysee.com/@moutonsnoirs-filmsetséries:e?view=content Recommandation…

Moutons Noirs/films et séries View Moutons Noirs/films et séries on Odysee odysee.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

La famille Asterix après la grande réinitialisation et Schwabotage de Macroneplu… La résistance " Teslaienne " en France https://odysee.com/@moutonsnoirs-filmsets%C3%A9ries:e/Vortex-laube-de-la-souverainet%C3%A9-FRENCH.1080p.HDTV.x264:0… “ Si vous voulez trouver les secrets de l’Univers, pensez en termes d’énergie, fréquences et vibrations. ” Nikola Tesla https://odysee.com/@moutonsnoirs-filmsetséries:e/Vortex-laube-de-la-souveraineté-FRENCH.1080p.HDTV.x264:0

Vortex l'aube de la souveraineté - Film français de Michel Rousseau Film de 2021 Cinéphile amateur, le Vauclusien Michel Rousseau a réalisé son premier film d'animation, dénommé "Vortex, l'aube de la souveraineté". Avec un budget limité et l'aide de sa famille, il a ... odysee.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

Cymatic Crazy experiences https://youtube.com/watch?v=rYrdiQckGhw… Cymatics. Professeur au Royal Institute pour les enfants… que nous sommes https://youtube.com/watch?v=wvJAgrUBF4w… Cymatics. 44 Millions de vues https://youtube.com/watch?v=hlWiI4xVXKY… Cymatic Effets de 400Hz a bien plus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYrdiQckGhw Cymatics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvJAgrUBF4w Cymatics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlWiI4xVXKY Cymatic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLNFrxgMJ6E

@alainsebil - alainseb

L'art géométrique me fascine depuis longtemps et à bien des égards. Dans cette vidéo, j'ai voulu montrer comment les formes géométriques relient les différentes couches de notre réalité et je voulais vous inspirer à réfléchir sur les connexions qui sont démontrées dans

@alainsebil - alainseb

cette vidéo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mynr7uik5-0 Relaxing musique https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlWiI4xVXKY DEVENIR DE PLUS EN PLUS CONSCIENT

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-037-@) Guy Bouliannes Je vous présente un article du Dr Laura Sanger, Ph. D. concernant les anciens Khazars, en lien avec la dynastie des Rothschild, le Nouvel Ordre Mondial, la situation actuelle en Ukraine et la mise en Œuvre de l’Agenda Nephilim https://qactus.fr/2022/09/24/rothschild-khazarie-dynastie-rothschild-nouvel-ordre-mondial-ukraine-et-mise-en-oeuvre-de-lagenda-nephilim/ https://qactus.fr/2022/09/24/rothschild-khazarie-dynastie-rothschild-nouvel-ordre-mondial-ukraine-et-mise-en-oeuvre-de-lagenda-nephilim/

Rothschild : Khazarie, Dynastie Rothschild, Nouvel Ordre Mondial, Ukraine Et Mise En Œuvre De L’Agenda Nephilim. Khazarie, Dynastie Rothschild, Nouvel Ordre Mondial, Ukraine Et Mise En Œuvre De L'Agenda Nephilim. Première partie Seconde partie Publié le 24.9.2022 Le DailyExpose.uk rapporte, lors d'un podcast, Clif High a fait un commentaire alléchant :  « En 1666, Sabbatai Zevi, il était un Khazarian et il était leur messie… [Zevi] a dit qu'il était acceptable pour… qactus.fr

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-038-@) Quelques infos pour l’Homo Stellarus en devenir Medvedev conseille une émission UFO : https://twitter.com/LetItShine69/status/1591803336323481601 https://twitter.com/Pacto_Secreto/status/1615031166305959938 https://twitter.com/lebanditmancho1/status/1532419080585678854?s=20… L’emission en référence https://youtube.com/watch?v=7sIXp2sT5yU&t=1s… Documentaire Men in Black https://youtube.com/watch?v=tNok1SexGA8… L’emission https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sIXp2sT5yU&t=1s Documentaire https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tNok1SexGA8

@LetItShine69 - Didier

🧐Une pépite - Vous souvenez-vous du premier ministre russe #Medvedev lorsqu'il révéla l'existence des extraterrestres en 2012 ? #Aliens #extraterrestres #Russie #PrimeMinister #UFOs #UFOSightings #UAPs @YvesPDB @BugaultV @BlackRussian84 @Vladimi61148201

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the transfer of a special folder containing top-secret information to the country's president. This folder is dedicated to visitors who have come to the planet and includes a confidential report from the intelligence agency responsible for monitoring our country. These folders are passed along with a nuclear briefcase when the presidency changes hands. For more information, the speaker suggests watching the well-known documentary film "Men in Black," which touches on this topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Абсолютно рассказываю вам первые последнего вместе чемодан с ядер кода. Президенту страны приносит специальную папку на ней написано совершенно секреты и она целиком полностью посвящена пришел которые посетили на планету одновременно доклад абсолютно закрытый спецслужб, которая занимается контролем на территории нашей страны значит две эти папки передаются вместе с ядер чемодан после п полномочий соответственно эти папки передается новому президенту. Более подробную информацию на эту тему вы можете получить, посмотрев известный документа фильм люди в черном вышло несколько мест сколько сколько я среди нас рассказывать не буду потому что это может вызвать

@Pacto_Secreto - PACTO SECRETO - Sal de la cueva y verás el código.

#UFO 07/12/2012. Moscú. Sede de la Televisión nacional rusa РЕН ТВ.Tras una entrevista sobre política, el que era en aquel entonces Primer Ministro de Rusia, Dmitry Medvedev, charla fuera de cámara sin saber que le estaban grabando. Y cuenta lo siguiente: https://youtu.be/zHCSpm2kepo

@alainsebil - alainseb

Le passé …https://www-ancient--origins-net.translate.goog/news-history-archaeology/notre-dame-sarcophagi-0017646?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… Le passé présent: Reel Zeta Reticuli sur Youtube depuis 11 ans https://twitter.com/alainsebil/status/1555433423241678850?s=20… https://www-ancient--origins-net.translate.goog/news-history-archaeology/notre-dame-sarcophagi-0017646?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en Le

Notre Dame Sarcophagus Opened Revealing Knight with Elongated Skull! The opening of two Notre Dame sarcophagi has led to more questions than answers. Why was a knight with an elongated skull interred in the sacred cathedral? www-ancient--origins-net.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

Le présent futur avec les Enfants... Bébés “Hubrids” (human hybrids) https://www.bitchute.com/video/gjkzHY40LNua/ Le futur avec les vidéos de TIM Les apprentis… que nous sommes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C28lps8nzok La lune expliquée https://www.youtube.com/@TimSpaceNews

More on the black eyed babies (Pandemic vaccinated babies) from La Quinta Columna Wow. Wait until you see all of these...It looks like advanced aging or something. Crawling at two weeks? Walking at 3 months? More videos you may want to see: Karma - Professor says damn the unvaccinated. Dies 12 days after her third shot. https:/… bitchute.com
INTERSTELLAR MEDIATOR ™ Presentation of my contacts from 2016 to 2021 and non-terrestrial concepts.Sharing my experience as a forest monk, spiritual wisdom, meditation and telepath... youtube.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

Ses livres : 👉 PREMIERS CONTACTS – https://www.amazon.fr/dp/2492922057 👉 ARTIFICIELLE – https://www.amazon.fr/dp/2492922030 👉 1793, MARIE-ANTOINETTE – https://www.amazon.fr/dp/2492922006

Amazon.fr amazon.fr
Amazon.fr amazon.fr
Amazon.fr amazon.fr

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-039-@) Le Plan de Dépeuplement révélé il y 50 ans ! Dégradations des mœurs, destruction de la famille, censure et information dirigée, contrôle de la médecine, limitation des soins pour faciliter l’élimination des vieux et enfin euthanasie... https://profession-gendarme.com/le-plan-de-depeuplement-revele-il-y-50-ans/ https://www.profession-gendarme.com/le-plan-de-depeuplement-revele-il-y-50-ans/

Le Plan de Dépeuplement révélé il y 50 ans ! – Profession Gendarme profession-gendarme.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-040-@) Médecin, après trois ans je n’ai toujours pas compris, et je pense que je ne comprendrai jamais : on a décidé de laisser mourir les patients atteints de Covid, on a empêché de les traiter. Un médecin ne laisse pas mourir un patient...

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-041-@) Positionnons-nous... La caverne de Platon. …https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/sociopolitica/sociopol_bigbrother161.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… Une matrice… Prison ou école ? …https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/ciencia/ciencia_matrix02.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… Pour ceux qui cherchent : …https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/ciencia/ciencia_matrix.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en#contents… https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/sociopolitica/sociopol_bigbrother161.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/ciencia/ciencia_matrix02.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/ciencia/ciencia_matrix.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en#contents

How Plato�s "The Republic" Describes Today's Society www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog
Matrix Intro www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog
Matrix www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-042-@) Une petite perle a archiver Ils créent des variants donc ils créent aussi le nouveau business de mise a jour des vaccins… Ce que l'on pourrait appeler les rappels... Ils créent aussi les Pb cardiaques et ils ont donc déjà investi dans les fabrication de

@alainsebil - alainseb

médicaments pour soigner les Pb cardiaques. C'est ce que l'on appelle faire du business... quand on a perdu toute humanité On les amènent quand au Nurember 2.0 ? version française : https://tinyurl.com/3vduvpkn ou ici https://odysee.com/@DIGITALSOLDIERCHANNEL:6/Traduction---Projet-Veritas---Pfizer:2… https://tinyurl.com/3vduvpkn https://odysee.com/@DIGITALSOLDIERCHANNEL:6/Traduction---Projet-Veritas---Pfizer:2

Traduction - Projet Veritas - Pfizer PROJECT VERITAS PFIZER JANVIER 2023 odysee.com
Traduction - Projet Veritas - Pfizer PROJECT VERITAS PFIZER JANVIER 2023 odysee.com

@alainsebil - alainseb

50 millions de vues seulement…

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

BREAKING: @Pfizer Exploring "Mutating" COVID-19 Virus For New Vaccines "Don't tell anyone this...There is a risk...have to be very controlled to make sure this virus you mutate doesn't create something...the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest." #DirectedEvolution

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer is considering mutating the COVID virus to create new vaccines, but they don't want the public to know. They are conducting experiments on live monkeys to study the virus and its mutations. Pfizer believes that by controlling the mutations in their labs, they can develop vaccines for new variants before they even emerge in nature. This would be a lucrative business model for them. The pharmaceutical industry has a revolving door with government officials, which benefits the industry but is bad for everyone else. The comments made by Pfizer's Jordan Walker show a lack of moral compass and a disregard for public health. Pfizer believes it has successfully captured the regulatory apparatus and can circumvent laws. Governments are turning a blind eye to this unethical behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID? Speaker 1: Well, that is not what we say to the public. No. Don't tell anyone the public. We have public show on Twitter. We have public show on Twitter. We have public show Speaker 2: on Twitter. We're scoring, like, not you Speaker 1: know how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it Speaker 3: hard So so we could both we Speaker 1: could create unduly developed new vaccines. Right? So we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk to have, like as you could imagine, no one wants to be Having a pharma company mutating viruses. We're, like, very controlled to make sure that those virus that you mutate doesn't create something like, you know, It goes everywhere. It's so crazy. It's the way that the virus started. It looked at it. To be honest, like, it's it is Speaker 4: no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. Speaker 1: Like Yeah. Speaker 5: I know. Meet Jordan Tristan Walker, a director of research and development strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning At Pfizer, Speaker 0: it sounds like gain a function to me. Speaker 1: I don't know. It's a little bit different. I think it's different. It's like this. Function research of the viruses, like Yeah. They recommend not. But you do, like, these, like, selected directional mutations to try to see if you make more protein. Yeah. So there there is research I'm learning about that. I don't know how that's gonna work. There are not being more outbreaks to take Jesus first. Speaker 6: The gentleman seems to have absolutely No moral compass at all. Speaker 1: Everyone's at the door for all government officials. It's pretty good for the industry, to be honest. Yeah. It's bad for everyone else in America. Speaker 0: Why is it bad for everybody else? Speaker 1: Is this the regulators who have approved our drugs? You know, that once they're shopping a regular, they They wanna go work for the company, then I gotta be as hard as I'm talking. Speaker 7: You know, we're hearing this off. Speaker 6: If this is the quality of individuals within Pfizer that are making these Huge decisions that risk global public health. It's profoundly corrupt. Speaker 0: What is Pfizer doing, I guess, to optimize, You know, the vaccines now. Speaker 1: Oh, we actually have a meeting about that today, so there's a lot. Really? They're doing nothing. I don't know if I should say this. Speaker 5: Our undercover journalist asked Walker how Pfizer is handling the fact that their COVID vaccines are ineffective against Virus variance. What he said is disturbing. Listen to this. Speaker 2: We're exploring, like, not you know Speaker 1: how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just we're explaining is, like, why don't we just mutate it hard to sell Speaker 3: so we could put we could create Speaker 1: actively develop group actions. Right? So we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk. Because, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a on a company mutating fucking viruses. Yeah. Okay. Like, so we wanna do this? So that's, like, one of these they're considering. Okay. For, like, the future, like, maybe we can, like, Great. New versions of the vaccines and things like that. Speaker 0: Okay. So Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID? Speaker 1: Well, that is not what we say to the public. No. That's why it was a thought that came up in a meeting and we're like, why why do we not? It was like, we're gonna consider A little more attention. Okay. Not exactly, actually. Right? We're like, wait a minute. Like, people are like, shit. Speaker 5: That's right. It appears that Pfizer is internally discussing the Possibility of mutating the COVID virus themselves in order to tailor a vaccine to sell to the public. Listen to Walker describe in detail just how they would Conduct such a scientific experiment first in living animals. Speaker 1: I'm sure I'm talking about it. Yeah. Okay. Right? So, the way it would work is, like, we put them in the virus in these monkeys. Okay. And then we successively, like, cause them to keep infecting each other. And we collect several samples from them, and then the ones that are more infectious, like the virus, we'll put them in another monkey, You just constantly actively mutate it. That's one way. Okay. Or you can even do, like, directed, like, simulation, which, like, we should not prefer. And then you just sample what the different, like, like, proteins on the surface of the virus look like over time. Okay. So then you can see the mutation that you can have forces and mutate in a certain way you want. Okay. Because you have to be, like, very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate does occur in something like, it goes everywhere. Something crazy. It's the way that the virus started, it moved out of there. To be honest, like, it's it's nuisance that Speaker 4: this virus walked out of nowhere. Speaker 1: Like Yeah. Speaker 5: I know. COVID virus experimentation on live monkeys? This is unethical, to say the least. And Walker describes those experiments as if they are ongoing and not simply a hypothetical discussion. Speaker 0: So, I mean, when is Pfizer gonna implement the mutation of all these viruses? Speaker 1: I don't know. Look at all the experiments we got. Speaker 0: Because this is like Something we're dying. Right? It sounds like gain a function to me. Speaker 1: I don't know. Totally different. I think it's different. Like, this Direct evolution? Directed evolution. Speaker 0: Directed evolution. Okay. Well, so, I mean, is that what it is? Maybe. I I Or Speaker 1: you're not supposed to gain function when you search for the viruses, like, they rather not. But you do, like, these, like, selected There are some mutations to try and see if we can get more COVID? Yeah. So there there is research online about that. I don't know how that's gonna work. There are not gonna be any more outbreaks, just like Jesus Christ. Speaker 0: So, tell me more, like, what's developing with the whole virus mutation process? Speaker 1: Well, they're still conducting the experiments on it, but, it seems like from the herd, they're kinda optimizing it, but if they're gonna Both of them are very cautious, like, you know Right. Obviously don't wanna cut it accelerate it too much. Yeah. But I think they also just try to do it as an exploratory thing because you I don't wanna advertise that entirely. Put out future mutations. Speaker 0: So did that did the whole virus mutation thing, like, come from your executive, Sarah? No, no, no. That came from like, Speaker 1: we have like chief scientific officers in like the other divisions. Speaker 5: In a subsequent meeting, our undercover journalist asked if this type of gain of function research is already being Studied at Pfizer. But no, as long as it's called directed evolution, Pfizer's in the clear. Speaker 0: What's the goal? Know. Well, there's lots of doing that. Speaker 1: So probably what they wanna do is, like, to try to figure out to some extent, try to figure out, like you know, there's all these new strains of variants that just Why don't we try to, like, catch them before they pop up in nature and we can develop a vaccine for prophylaxis for, like, new variants? Yeah. So that's why they're thinking, like, if we do it in control of their labs, then we say, oh, this is a methytoke. And so they say it comes out later on, like, in the public, we already have a vaccine kind of working on. Speaker 0: Oh my god. That's perfect. Like, isn't that, like, The best business model though? Like, Speaker 1: just control Speaker 0: nature before nature even happens itself. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. If it works. What do you mean if it works? Because, like, sometimes, like, we just need mutations to pop up. Right? We're not prepared for it. Like, with Delta or Omicron Right. And things like that. So Who knows? I mean, either way, it's gonna be a cash cow. COVID is probably a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Speaker 0: Yeah. I obviously like Well, I think the whole, you know, I think the whole, like, research of the viruses and mutating it, like, Would be the ultimate, like, cash cow. Speaker 1: Yeah. It would be perfect. Speaker 5: Now you would think that creating viruses to sell the vaccine would be illegal, But no, the pharmaceutical industry, as Walker puts it, is a revolving door for all government officials. Quote. Speaker 1: I don't know if they're out the door for all government officials. Wow. Yeah. For any industry, though. So, like, in the pharma industry, all the government, officials who, like, you're you're at drugs, Unless they come work for a problem with peace. Like, the military, like, all the, like, army defense, like, government officials eventually go work for the defense company afterwards. Speaker 0: How do you feel about that revolving More like Speaker 1: it's been good for the industry, to be honest. Yeah. Yeah. It's bad for everyone else in America. Speaker 0: Why is it bad for everybody else? Speaker 1: Because it's the regulators who have approved our drugs. You know that once they're shopping regularly, they wanna go work for the company, then I gotta be as hard for the company. Speaker 7: You know, we're getting their jobs. Right. Speaker 5: We talked to doctor Robert Malone, Physician, scientist, and author to get his take on the comments made by Jordan Walker. Speaker 6: You're gaining function. You're creating a new function in virus 1 by adding elements from virus 2, infecting 1 monkey and then another monkey. That's called serial passage. That appears to have been one of the technologies deployed in the Wuhan Institute of Virology with the humanized mouse Strains that I believe were obtained from, EcoHealth Alliance. That's an example of directed evolution. The gentleman seems to have Absolutely no moral compass at all about what he's doing. The hubris and arrogance and immaturity, If this is the quality of individuals within Pfizer that are making these huge decisions that risk global public health with such a Casual disregard for the human toll. It's profoundly corrupt in terms of would it be feasible For Pfizer to circumvent international or national law, I think that is undeniable. And the gentleman in your investigative work Has clearly indicated that Pfizer believes that it has successfully captured The regulatory apparatus of the United States government and presumably worldwide, Pfizer has completed regulatory capture, He's quite proud of it. Speaker 5: With governments turning a blind eye and Pfizer hiding information from the public, this is an ongoing story. Be brave. Do something. Spread these videos and stay tuned.

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-043-@) Comprendre notre futur avec la 6G et plus Fusionner les mondes humain, numérique et physique Après la voix (2G), le texte et les SMS (3G), les données et les apps (4G), l’Internet des objets et l’automatisation industrielle (5G), la 6G entend ouvrir un champ

@alainsebil - alainseb

d’applications nouvelles. En intégrant les mondes physiques et numériques et en associant l’imagerie, la localisation et l’intelligence artificielle, ces applications permettront une immersion complète dans l’espace numérique pour des expériences de communication,

@alainsebil - alainseb

d’interaction et de collaboration en réalité virtuelle, mais aussi de la télé-chirurgie en temps réel, du streaming de vidéos en 16K, des véhicules autonomes et des jumeaux numériques. 6G et l’enjeu géopolitique « Il peut sembler étrange de commencer à façonner la 6e

@alainsebil - alainseb

génération de réseaux de communication mobile (6G) alors que la 5G commence tout juste à être déployée dans le monde entier. Mais nous pouvons déjà imaginer les futurs cas d’utilisation possibles, tels que la téléportation et le jumeau numérique, le transport intelligent et

@alainsebil - alainseb

autonome, ou encore une expérience de commerce et de paiement entièrement numérique. Outre les technologies et les services, les modèles commerciaux des réseaux de communication mobile continueront à évoluer rapidement dans les années à venir. Dans le domaine des technologies

@alainsebil - alainseb

mobiles, comme dans de nombreux autres domaines, les facteurs géopolitiques pourraient signifier un avenir plus fragmenté pour le monde. En effet, dans leur désir de souveraineté numérique, les différents gouvernements poussent les chercheurs universitaires et industriels

@alainsebil - alainseb

nationaux à générer autant de droits de propriété intellectuelle que possible, façonnant ainsi le paysage de la 6G. »

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-044-@) Faisons les liens : ...Le vaxxin de Pfizer contient une séquence promotrice d'un virus cancérigène, le SV 40... comme en 1955 et 1963 Rappel d'un article: Le vaccin contre la polio contaminé par le virus SV40 dans les années 50 et 60 pourrait provoquer certains

@alainsebil - alainseb

cancers Article du 20 août 2001 - En avril dernier, plus de 60 scientifiques réunis à Chicago ont mis en joue leur ennemi commun: un virus de singe qui a contaminé les premiers vaccins contre la polio entre 1955 et 1963 et qui serait carcinogène...

@alainsebil - alainseb

Article : https://tinyurl.com/3u44cdcz

Le vaccin contre la polio contaminé par le virus SV40 dans les années 50 et 60 pourrait provoquer certains cancers La contamination du vaccin contre la polio par le virus SV40 dans les années 50 et 60 inquiète de plus en plus de scientifiques passeportsante.net

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-045-@) Qui contrôle la réalité convenue à travers les médias grand public et pourquoi craignent-ils de divulguer la vérité sur la réalité extraterrestre ? Dan Willis est l'un des témoins militaires top secrets qui a témoigné au National Press Club à Washington DC

@alainsebil - alainseb

en 2001 devant les principaux médias grand public du monde. Un événement mondial de divulgation provoqué par ceux au sein de notre gouvernement Il a un site web très documenté. Qui contrôle la réalité convenue à travers les médias grand public et pourquoi craignent-ils

@alainsebil - alainseb

de divulguer la vérité sur la réalité extraterrestre ? Il nous raconte l'histoire avec : IMAGINE CA https://thewebmatrix-net.translate.goog/disclosure/imaginethis.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… Historique de 1900 a aujourd’hui https://thewebmatrix-net.translate.goog/disclosure/index.html?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_h… https://thewebmatrix-net.translate.goog/disclosure/imaginethis.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en Historique https://thewebmatrix-net.translate.goog/disclosure/index.html?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_h

Imagine This... thewebmatrix-net.translate.goog
Who controls the agreed upon reality through the mainstream media and why they fear disclosing the truth about the extraterrestrial reality? thewebmatrix-net.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-046-@) Selon le professeur Bernard Claverie et le lieutenant-colonel François du Cluzel, la guerre cognitive est ainsi nécessairement associée à d'autres formes et domaines d'action pour atteindre le ou les cerveaux-cibles, tels le cyber warfare et l'information

@alainsebil - alainseb

warfare; elle correspond ainsi à « l'art d'utiliser les technologies pour altérer la cognition de cibles humaines, le plus souvent à leur insu et à l'insu de ceux qui seraient en charge d'éviter, minimiser, contrôler les effets recherchés, ou dont un contrôle possible serait

@alainsebil - alainseb

dépassé ou trop tardif »dépassé ou trop tardif » Comment induire “l’AGITATION SOCIALE” dans une région de la Terre Une base reptilienne, détruite depuis, émettait depuis des millénaires une fréquence particulière choisie qui monte les gens les uns contre les autres.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Voila des armes du NWO et des reptiliens pour la manipulation des humains. Jugez par vous-même. Bonne lecture ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Article : Confirmation - Destruction d'une base sous-marine reptilienne Extrait :

@alainsebil - alainseb

…”De plus, mes contacts andromédiens m'ont dit que cette base est profonde, à des milliers de pieds sous l'eau, à environ un mile et demi (1&1/2) de profondeur. Et cette base a émis pendant des années une fréquence sonore atténuée très spécifique, très irritante et très agitante

@alainsebil - alainseb

, basée sur la peur et induisant la colère, directement dans la région du Moyen-Orient, en raison du nord-nord-est 'pour garder les gens de cette région dans un état constant et élevé de confusion émotionnelle, de peur, d'agitation, de colère et d'agressivité. « Ils m'ont montré

@alainsebil - alainseb

qu'il y a un émetteur qui s'élève littéralement du plafond de cette base, un peu comme un périscope dans un sous-marin, et il tourne. Une fréquence particulière est choisie qui monte les gens les uns contre les autres. Ensuite, les Reptiliens l'allument. Ils l'allument presque

@alainsebil - alainseb

tous les jours. Cependant, si les gens étaient sous l'eau ou debout sur la terre ferme, ils ne pourraient pas capter cette fréquence, ce faisceau, de leurs propres yeux. C'est sonique, une fréquence sonore. Et, c'est hors de notre spectre. Mais c'est ainsi que les Reptiliens

@alainsebil - alainseb

dominent et contrôlent ces gens. Cette base particulière est en activité depuis environ 5 000 ans. Et les énergies vibratoires soniques hautement agitatrices rayonnées à partir de cette base atteignent également jusqu'à, * Syrie * Irak * L'Iran * Afghanistan * Pakistan, ...et un

@alainsebil - alainseb

tas d'autres pays de la région, dont Israël et la Palestine … …L’attaque du 31 octobre 2011 par le Conseil d'Andromède survient un peu plus de deux mois après l'attaque aux armes à faisceau sonique signalée par le Conseil d'Andromède le 23 août 2011. qui a détruit les bases et

@alainsebil - alainseb

les tunnels souterrains des reptiles Orion gray et Draco & Hydra sous Washington DC et qui a entraîné un tremblement de terre peu profond de 0,1 km ressenti de la Virginie à Ottawa, au Canada. Des chercheurs indépendants ont maintenant déclaré que le tremblement de terre du 23

@alainsebil - alainseb

août 2001 en Virginie-Washington DC était le résultat d'une attaque extraterrestre avancée utilisant des armes à fréquence pour détruire les bases grises, reptiliennes et du Nouvel Ordre Mondial ( NWO ) sous Washington DC , et que des attaques extraterrestres avancées similaires

@alainsebil - alainseb

détruit des bases reptiliennes souterraines et NWO sous Denver, CO et dans le sud-ouest des États-Unis… Source : https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/vida_alien/alien_galacticfederations29.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en

Andromeda Council Sonic Beam Destroys Reptilian Base - Magnitude 5.0 Gulf of Aden Quake www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog

@alainsebil - alainseb

Destruction de bases reptiliennes par le Conseil d'Andromède …Quant au but de détruire la base des Reptiliens au large des côtes du Moyen-Orient, déclare Tolec , "Cependant, retirer la base reptilienne du fond de l'océan au sud de l'Arabie saoudite, des Émirats arabes unis, du

@alainsebil - alainseb

Yémen, de la péninsule d'Oman est une priorité, une affaire beaucoup plus urgente. La raison est simple. Comme vous le savez, l'histoire de la Terre continue de se répéter . lui-même année après année. Les querelles, les escarmouches dans cette région, ont duré des

@alainsebil - alainseb

milliers d'années. Et les raisons originales de ces escarmouches ont été exagérées. Avec l'aide de la base sous-marine des Reptiliens, comme on peut le comprendre . "Et, le 'bombardement' constant de cette région avec une énergie très dommageable, provoquant l'agitation, la

@alainsebil - alainseb

confusion, la colère et la peur émis par l'émetteur de cette base sous-marine spécifique 'continue d'intensifier la possibilité d'une guerre totale dans cette région. des combats constants , irritation, bagarres", même parmi les leurs. Et ils ne réalisent pas ce qui se passe.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Ils ne connaissent même pas la raison - La base sous-marine avec son émetteur "En terminant, je vais citer le commandant de la biosphère principale du Conseil d'Andromède , quand je l'ai interrogé sur cette situation, il a dit, « 'Les gens de cette zone sont manipulés comme

@alainsebil - alainseb

ce que vous appelleriez des 'pions sur un échiquier', et ils ne savent pas comment, pourquoi ou depuis combien de temps cela s'est produit. Nous devons et nous mettrons fin à cela. Cette base sous-marine sera retirée. "'Oui, des factions extérieures, avec des intérêts extérieurs

@alainsebil - alainseb

, ont tenté des attaques nucléaires afin de déclencher une guerre à grande échelle dans cette région. Nous avons arrêté, désactivé et neutralisé les bombes à quelques reprises. Oui, nous avons eu une 'main' en cela. "'Comprenez qu'une guerre nucléaire à grande échelle ne peut

@alainsebil - alainseb

pas se produire et ne se produira pas dans cette région. Nous n'allons pas autoriser des actions qui permettent à un côté ou à l'autre de déclencher une guerre nucléaire. L'impact serait trop important pour votre planète. , votre peuple et le reste du système solaire. Ce qui se

@alainsebil - alainseb

fait sur Terre nous affecte tous.'" Source …https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_underground34.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en… ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lien pdf (sur mon proton drive) : https://tinyurl.com/25t3ufw4 https://www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_underground34.htm?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Lien https://tinyurl.com/25t3ufw4

Destrucci�n de Bases Submarinas Reptilianas en El Oriente Medio y China - Concejo de Andromeda www-bibliotecapleyades-net.translate.goog
Proton Drive Proton Drive allows you to securely store and share your sensitive documents and access them anywhere. drive.proton.me

@alainsebil - alainseb

(@-AS-047-@) C'est vraiment une superbe analyse… C’est a archiver pour la passer autour de nous pour aider a comprendre le COVID = Certificat Of Vaccination ID… (ID: Information Document) ll fallait détruire les 30% de résistants spécialement https://t.co/KMRBvOlIVj

@alainsebil - alainseb

ceux en Guadeloupe qui aurait pu être le mauvais exemple pour la France… Donc on envoie le GIGN… Incroyable… Il y avait aussi 40% d’indécis 30% convaincus Quelques éléments d’explication ci-après Attention a ce qui se profile : Une certaine partie de la population est

@alainsebil - alainseb

totalitaire NUMERIQUE... +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ prêt a accepter un régime L’HISTOIRE JUGERA TRES SERIEUSEMENT CETTE CORRUPTION SYSTEMIQUE des mondes économique, gouvernemental, scientifique avec les gouvernements et les personnes qui on suivi les consignes…

@alainsebil - alainseb

des gens qui me mentent tout le temps et c’est flagrant… Je reprends mon pouvoir, je récupère ma souveraineté, je reprends mon libre arbitre et JE SORS DE LA PEUR. Une fois que vous sortez de la peur et que vous vous connecter au COURAGE pour être en accord avec ses

@alainsebil - alainseb

convictions, celui-ci est relié a l’énergie du cœur une énergie extrêmement puissante ou on ne peux plus vous manipuler et donc vous reprenez le contrôle Est-ce ce monde que nous voulons pour nos enfants? Un monde ou on a peur de tout ? Comment j’incarne ce que je veux ?

@alainsebil - alainseb

Comment je sors de la peur ? Quand j’en suis sorti, le MANIPULATEUR N’A PLUS DE PRISE Je me rends vers un autre monde en harmonie… avec la nature et mes bactéries… Merci aux courageux Guadeloupéens et aux pays pauvres comme en Afrique qui sont les témoins de cette

@alainsebil - alainseb

résistance a un PLANDEMIE (fausse pandémie) et qui sont les témoins non-impacté par des effets secondaires quand certains vaccinés subissent de graves effets secondaires, voir meurent des suites de ces injections géniques.

@alainsebil - alainseb

Je me rends vers un autre monde en harmonie… avec la nature et mes bactéries Attention : Une certaine partie de la population est prête a accepter un régime totalitaire NUMERIQUE... Passer ce message qui aide a comprendre la grande manipulation COVID https://t.co/KMRBvOlIVj

@alainsebil - alainseb

@reSeeIt save thread

Saved - March 28, 2013 at 2:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Preserve any tweet forever as an NFT using 0xPolygon blockchain and IPFS. Use reSeeIt to save threads or single tweets, including images and videos, ensuring they are stored forever. Follow reSeeIt to keep Twitter discourse alive and uncensored.

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Save any Tweet forever as an #NFT using the power of the @0xPolygon blockchain and @IPFS. Reply to any thread with “@reSeeIt save thread,” or a single Tweet with “@reSeeIt save this.” A screenshot, PDF, and all the details are stored forever... a thread.

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Interesting Tweet 🧵that might not conform to the narrative? Make sure the censorship mob will never stop 🛑 you from seeing it. https://resee.it/tweet/1582074461343584256

reSee.it #182 - @PROTOG11 PDF, screenshot, and permanently saved Tweet Thread from @PROTOG11 resee.it

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Maybe it's a video that might get "disappeared" by the tech overlords. @reSeeIt saves every image and video forever using the Interplanetary File System 🪐, so that video be preserved forever. https://resee.it/tweet/1617562247567663104

reSee.it #109 - @alx PDF, screenshot, and permanently saved Tweet Conversation with @alx, @elonmusk resee.it

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Or just a memorable Tweet that you want to archive https://resee.it/token/1

reSee.it #1 - @elonmusk @elonmusk - PDF, screenshot, & permanently saved Tweet resee.it

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Follow @reSeeIt, and do your part to make sure what is said and shared on Twitter remains a part of our discourse.

Saved - June 19, 2023 at 12:39 AM

@BlackBondPtv - Black Bond PTV

1/2 Ceci est une des vidéos les plus importantes que je n’ai jamais posté sur mon Twitter . La manipulation des élites est encore plus perverse que vous ne l’imaginez. À voir absolument !

Video Transcript AI Summary
The history of America is about rich white men dividing poor white people from black and brown individuals. In the colonial period, there was no concept of "white." Europeans didn't identify as such and were divided among themselves. However, the wealthy elite realized they needed to separate the poor Europeans and enslaved Africans to protect their own interests. They created the idea of whiteness, granting certain privileges to poor Europeans to align them with the elite. This allowed the rich to control and oppress black people. The creation of whiteness served as a tool to maintain power and prevent unity among the oppressed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the whole history of America is the history of rich white men telling not rich white people that their enemies are black and brown. It starts in the colonies of what would become the United States. Let's remember, during the colonial period mid 1600, there was no such thing as white people. I know some people who are now called white find that shocking. Right? Because they think whiteness is real. Right? But whiteness was created. Europeans didn't call themselves white. We didn't call ourselves white. We weren't all members of 1 big happy Family, are you kidding? Have you studied the history of Europe? The history of Europe was about killing each other. That's what we did in Europe. We just killed each Before we figured out there were other people to kill, we just killed each other. Right? I mean, that was the history of Europe. The English hated the Irish. Right? Northern Italians didn't even think that southern Italians were Italians. The Germans hated everybody, and everybody hated their ass right back. Right? There was no team called white. No race called white. But all of a sudden, in the middle of the 1600, there was. Why? Why was it suddenly necessary to create this thing called the white race. Well, because rich people can count. That's why. And so rich folks looked around the ones that owned all the land, you know, in the colonies, the Colonial elite looked around and they realized something, that they were heavily outnumbered by African enslaved folks, by European indentured servants who were just one level above a slave or other Europeans who weren't technically indentured servants, but they were still peasants, didn't have any money, didn't have any land, and they could do the math. They added it up and they were like, damn, we gotta figure out a way to split these folks apart from one another or they're gonna rise up and take our stuff. Right? Because after a while, these black folks who were enslaved Africans and these quote unquote white folks who were poor Europeans are gonna figure out they're all getting played by these rich people. Right? So ultimately, the rich figure out they've gotta come up with some way to get somebody in that group on their team. The easiest thing is to get the poor Europeans. Right? Because at least they look like you. They sort of share some of the customs and the culture. So they all of a sudden create this thing called whiteness, and they say now you're part of the club. Now we're gonna let you testify in court, enter into contracts, vote at least if you're a man, own a little bit of land at least if you're a man. Right? And we're going to get rid of indentured servitude. No more of that because you're too good for that. And we're gonna take the white men now called White men and put them on the slave patrol to keep black people in

@BlackBondPtv - Black Bond PTV

2/2 Ceci est une des vidéos les plus importantes que je n’ai jamais posté sur mon Twitter . La manipulation des élites est encore plus perverse que vous ne l’imaginez. À voir absolument !

Video Transcript AI Summary
Black people were given positions of power, but they remained poor and lacked resources. The slave patrol was used as a means to exploit and control poor people, especially those of color. The elite used this division to prevent rebellions where black and white people united against them. The strategy of divide and conquer was effective in turning poor white individuals against black people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Black people in line. Give them a horse and a gun and a badge and make them feel big and powerful. Right? They're still poor. They still don't have anything. They didn't pay the slave patrol well. Right? Just exploited them, used them as a buffer between the elite and The other poor folks, particularly poor folks of color, and pretty soon, the rebellions that occasionally happen where black and white got together to overthrow the elite, those stopped because the divide and conquer had begun to work. Right? You could turn people against each other by telling those poor white folks they gotta keep these black people in
Saved - August 5, 2023 at 9:17 AM

@TradersRetreat - Traders Retreat

This is awesome for saving posts. Next, let’s do Spaces

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Preserve the most valuable Tweets for eternity with @reSeeIt. Watch our video to learn how we're harnessing blockchain technology with #PolygonNFTs and @IPFS to revolutionize tweet archiving and end censorship.

Video Transcript AI Summary
ReSeeIt is a game-changing solution that preserves tweets, making them easily shareable, searchable, durable, and authentic. By replying with specific commands like "re see it, save this" or "re see it, save thread," users can archive tweets, Twitter threads, or conversations. ReSeeIt captures screenshots, creates PDFs, and downloads photos and videos. It generates a comprehensive file with tweet text, author data, and permanent links to media. The data is signed cryptographically and stored on IPFS, with a token created on the Polygon blockchain for an immutable record and censorship-resistant link. ReSeeIt provides a convenient link for viewing, sharing, and downloading archived tweets, ensuring the preservation of valuable Twitter knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over the past few years, it has become abundantly clear that tweets are ephemeral by nature, subject to deletion, censorship or simply fading into the social media ether. Before now, preserving this information or discourse required tedious workarounds such as taking screenshots, saving them as PDFs, or even printing out paper copies, none of which made the saved tweets easily shareable, searchable, durable, or verifiably authentic. Enter ReSeeIt, our game changing solution to this challenge. Powered by the decentralized, distributed file storage protocol IPFS, And secured by the Polygon blockchain, ReSeeIt ensures that important tweets endure forever. Using ReSeeIt couldn't be simpler. If you want to archive a tweet, reply with re see it, save this. To save an entire Twitter thread, respond with re see it, Save thread. And to preserve a Twitter conversation between 2 individuals, just type re see it. Save conversation. As soon as you send those magic words, re see it, springs into action. It captures a high quality screenshot, creates a PDF, and downloads every photo and video within the tweet or thread. Next, we generate a comprehensive file that contains the full text of every tweet to to be preserved. Author data, permanent links to each image and video, and more. To ensure authenticity, we sign the data cryptographically before storing it permanently on IPFS. Finally, we mint a token on the Polygon blockchain. This token creates an immutable record of the stored tweet and provides a permanent, censorship resistant link to all the stored data. This link persists regardless of our website's availability, ensuring unfettered access. Once everything is ready, Re see it. Replies with a convenient link. With this, you can view, share, and download the archived tweet, Grab a PDF copy, retrieve the videos, or simply share the link far and wide. ReSeeIt is more than a tool. It's a robust solution to preserve the vast and valuable knowledge repository that is Twitter. Don't just witness the conversation. Keep it alive with ReSeeIt.
Saved - August 31, 2023 at 12:26 AM

@schmittpaula - Paula Schmitt

Não pesquisei, mas @reseeit parece um ótimo jeito de salvar tweets além do archive. "Preservando tweets on blockchain Polygon e IPFS. Salve tweets, threads e conversas como imagem de alta resolução, PDF e registros permanentes. Sem censura, seguro e duradouro."

Saved - October 15, 2023 at 7:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Social media platforms like Twitter contribute to ideological division by trapping users in echo chambers. This strengthens the powerful, who benefit from a divided populace. While it's possible that these technologies are consciously used for social engineering, their impact is undeniable. To understand more, read "Discours de la servitude intellectuelle" by Alexis Haupt. (437 characters)

@AlexisPhilo - Alexis Haupt Philosophie

Le côté pervers de Twitter, expliqué sur Twitter : "Les réseaux sociaux et autres plateformes de vidéos enferment leurs utilisateurs dans une bulle idéologique. En cela, ils remplissent à merveille leur rôle de division : ils amplifient le clanisme intellectuel : la division du peuple en clans idéologiques rivaux. Ceci ayant pour effet, comme chacun sait, de renforcer les puissants au pouvoir. Ceux-là mêmes qui sont d’autant plus à l’abri que le peuple est divisé. S’il est possible que les nouvelles technologies soient utilisées consciemment comme outils d’ingénierie sociale afin de retarder tout projet émancipateur du peuple, il est certain qu’elles ont un tel effet." Discours de la servitude intellectuelle https://amazon.fr/Discours-servitude-intellectuelle-soumission-tyrannie/dp/2379662541/ref=sr_1_2?__mk_fr_FR=…ÅMÅŽÕÑ&crid=B3I26NTSOCQA&keywords=alexis+haupt&qid=1697349770&sprefix=alexis+haupt%2Caps%2C91&sr=8-2

Saved - October 16, 2023 at 3:25 PM

@idrissaberkane - Idriss J. Aberkane Ph.D, Ph.D & Ph.D

Pour contourner la censure délirante de @YTCreateurs je profite donc de l'espace de liberté défendu par @elonmusk et je reposte la vidéo dans son intégralité sur @X

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker provides a comprehensive analysis of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine. They emphasize the importance of understanding the political objectives of war and the dangers of escalating violence. The speaker discusses the growing solidarity with the Palestinian cause in the Arab-Muslim world and the potential for the conflict to involve more parties. They analyze the political objectives of Hamas and the Israeli government, particularly focusing on the issue of borders and the demographic challenges faced by Israel. The potential consequences of an irreversible evacuation of Gaza and the threat of nuclear escalation in the region are also explored. The speaker suggests that the Israeli administration's opposition to a one-state solution and their desire to evacuate Gaza and the West Bank may underestimate the potential dangers, including the possibility of Arab-Muslim countries arming themselves with nuclear weapons. They propose an alternative approach where the Arab-Muslim world channels their frustration into massive construction projects, creating a new Gaza and a unified front against Israel. The speaker concludes by urging all parties to prevent further escalation and emphasizes the importance of learning from past wars and understanding and anticipating the next political moves in the conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: La guerre est la continuation de la politique par d'autres moyens. Et quand on met ses émotions de côté, on doit impérativement lire l'objectif politique de toute guerre. Or, c'est très dur de mettre ses émotions de côté, ne serait-ce que l'espace d'un instant, d'abord par solidarité, ensuite parce que nous sommes humains et que c'est une très bonne chose de ressentir des émotions. Mais on doit observer aujourd'hui que la guerre en Israël et Palestine a atteint une vitesse morbide de croisière de l'ordre de soixante morts par heure, c'est à peu près aujourd'hui la vitesse moyenne de de mort qui a atteint ce conflit. On a connu des conflits qui mangeaient les humains beaucoup plus rapidement. Heureusement, celui-là n'en fait pas encore partie. Mais quand on l'analyse, aujourd'hui, c'est à peu près la vitesse morbide de croisière qui l'a atteint. Évidemment bien davantage du côté palestinien, les statistiques ne se démentent pas, mais je veux impérativement préserver dans cette vidéo mon privilège que j'ai conquis de haute lutte de pouvoir m'adresser aux deux parties. Si tant est d'ailleurs qu'il y ait eu deux parties seulement, ce conflit est en fait beaucoup plus compliqué qu'un conflit à deux parties, puisqu'on a beaucoup plus de parties prenantes dans la région. Mais si on s'intéresse simplement, disons à Israël et au gazaoui, en l'occurrence pour la bande de Gaza, c'est s'adresser aux deux parties simplement, la solidarité à la cause palestinienne aujourd'hui est en train de gagner la totalité du monde arabo-musulman, musulman delà d'ailleurs du monde arabe, puisque ça va aujourd'hui jusqu'en Malaisie, en Indonésie ou même jusqu'au Pakistan qui n'est pas un pays arabe où on a assisté à des scènes de rue particulièrement préoccupantes, ceux d'autant plus que le Pakistan est une puissance nucléaire, la seule puissance nucléaire musulmane et c'est un des objets de cette vidéo. Parce que si aujourd'hui ce conflit n'est qu'à sa vitesse morbide de croisière de soixante morts par heure, donc à peu près soixante morts dans l'espace où je vais enregistrer cette vidéo, bien il pourrait rapidement dégénérer en un conflit infiniment plus meurtriers et c'est bien entendu pour cela que j'enregistre cette vidéo et que je veux maintenir mon privilège de pouvoir m'adresser à toutes les parties, c'est pour ça que je vais pour l'instant éviter certains sujets ou certaines interprétations en essayant de me concentrer uniquement sur une seule problématique, comment réduire la vitesse morbide de croisière de ce conflit et comment éviter quelle escalade Parce que c'est très vraisemblablement ce qui va se passer. Alors l'attaque du Hamas a eu lieu aux cinquante ans de la guerre du Kippour, mais cette guerre n'est pas la deuxième guerre du Kippour. La première guerre du Kippour était hautement coordonnées entre plusieurs nations qui ont attaqué en même temps. L'Iran a été accusé d'avoir soutenu le Hamas et d'être derrière cette attaque, je vais vous le dire clairement et je l'ai déjà dit sur Twitter de tous les documents que j'ai pu consulter et de toutes les analyses que j'ai pu faire, j'ai acquis l'intime conviction que l'Iran n'était absolument pas derrière les attaques du Hamas. Cependant l'Iran se retrouve par le jeu des alliances dans un engrenage évident d'abord parce que son peuple est totalement solidaire de la cause palestinienne d'une part et on a vu des feux d'artifice lancés dans les rues en Iran, ça ressemble même limite à un match de foot. On voyait ça aussi pendant la guerre des 6 jours ou même pendant la guerre du Kippour. Vous aviez un avion israélien abattu, c'était célébré par exemple en Algérie comme s'il y avait eu un but au foot. Et c'est ça le mécanisme des émotions qui est en fait un précurseur au mécanisme réellement diplomatique, au mécanisme politique qui est l'engrenage des alliances, soit des alliances formelles comme pendant la première guerre mondiale, soit des alliances émotionnelles ou des alliances, disons de sympathie entre plusieurs peuples. Or là, aujourd'hui, bien la sympathie entre les différents pays musulmans et la situation à Gaza est en train de se consolider et cette consolidation peut amener à des entrées en guerre plus formelles. On a vu d'ailleurs le Hezbollah qui n'a pas mené d'attaque coordonner avec le Hamas, or c'était ce à quoi on aurait dû s'attendre si l'Iran était derrière cette attaque du Hamas. Et d'ailleurs, il faut toujours poser les questions de quel objectif politique aurait voulu être atteint par cette attaque, aussi bien du côté du Hamas d'ailleurs, que du côté de l'Iran. Et cette question n'est pas du tout claire, mais on voit aujourd'hui que le Hezbollah n'a pas attaqué de façon coordonnée avec le Hamas. Cependant, il est en train d'entrer lentement, mais sûrement dans ce conflit avec des tirs de roquettes et des frappes de drones au nord d'Israël. Bon, les effectifs ne permettent pas à Horesbollah de de mener une attaque, une offensive en Israël, elle permet, ses effectifs permettaient aux Hezbollahs d'avoir une capacité de défense absolument remarquables sur le plan militaire dans les années deux-mille-six, mais ça c'était en étant retranché et fortifiée face à une armée israélienne qui n'était pas sur son terrain, à savoir dans le sud Liban. Mais une offensive au nord d'Israël, alors qu'Israël a eu le temps de mobiliser autour de cinq-cent-mille hommes sur le pied de guerre, enfin cinq-cent-mille personnels, il y a des femmes aussi sur le pied de guerre. Ça, c'est inenvisageable pour l'instant. Et les accès de toute façon au territoire israélien pour une armée d'invasion serait par le Golan et qui est hautement fortifiée, hautement défendue et par le sud Liban auquel l'Iran n'a absolument pas accès et duquel le Hezbollah avec ses cent mille hommes ne peut pas mener d'opérations de grande ampleur, en tout cas pour vraiment menacer les centres politiques israéliens, ceux d'autant plus qu'il y a le Géral Ford sur zone. Et le groupe aéronaval du Géralford a été déployé bien entendu avec l'intention politique de dissuader tout nouvel entrant militaire dans ce conflit. Pour laisser donc la situation entre Israël et la bande de Gaza, mais dans ce cas-là, on va avoir une accumulation on la voit déjà, une accumulation explosive de ressentiment et de volonté d'intervenir de la part des pays arabo musulmans et donc musulmans non arabes en particulier comme le Pakistan, mais voire aussi comme l'Indonésie qui pourtant est un pays très neutre et comme la Malaisie. Et les tensions s'accumulent. Alors analysons maintenant les objectifs politiques. Et il est très important que les Israéliens comprennent que les objectifs politiques sont hautement dépendants du gouvernement Netanyahou, c'est-à-dire que cette situation, cette crise aurait pu être gérée d'une multitude de façons différentes. Mais la façon dont elle est gérée aujourd'hui et la façon dont Israël y répond aujourd'hui, est une façon bien précisément déterminée par le gouvernement Netanyahou et sa coalition de droite. Et c'est bien pour ça d'ailleurs que la gauche israélienne continue de l'attaquer même si évidemment quand on a des attaques dans un pays, on a une union nationale qui se forme, mais c'est très marquant de voir y a une grande diversité d'opinions dans la presse israélienne, en particulier avec le journal de référence de la gauche israélienne. Certains diraient certes de l'extrême gauche israélienne, à savoir Areitz qui appartient donc à la famille Schengen et qui attaque à Boulet rouge l'administration Netanyahou depuis le début du conflit en en laissant entendre que Netanyahou a mis en danger délibérément la vie d'israéliens pour se créer une opportunité politique, c'est ce que certains analystes ont laissé entendre et Hared fait partie de ces analyses notamment parce que nous savons que en effet l'administration d'Hetanyahou a été favorable au Hamas dans des discours d'une part et d'autre part dans sa politique en disant que finalement l'OLP, le Fatah qui était l'alternative politique, bien était beaucoup plus dangereux justement parce l'amenait la possibilité de la création d'un État palestinien, alors que le Hamas est beaucoup plus chaotique, beaucoup plus dangereux, mais pas dangereux sur le plan politique, dangereux sur le plan militaire, un plan évidemment face auquel l'administration Netanyahou considérait qu'elle aurait l'avantage. Elle l'a aujourd'hui, mais elle ne l'a pas eu pendant les premiers jours de ce de ce conflit. Et donc on a plusieurs analystes qui ont été vertement critiquées. Je veux rapporter l'opinion de de de toutes les parties, vous avez notamment deux analystes qui étaient, qui abondaient dans le même sens à une époque le docteur Elie David d'une part et Ephrad Phoenixson d'autre part et les deux aujourd'hui s'écharpent sur cette question-là et vraiment s'opposent frontalement Ephrad Phoenixson qui considère qui est dans le camp des personnes qui considèrent que Netanyahou a par négligence au minimum mis délibérément la vie en danger d'israéliens et aujourd'hui saisit cette opportunité politique d'atteindre un objectif précis qui n'est pas forcément l'objectif qu'aurait voulu atteindre politique bien sûr la gauche israélienne ou un autre gouvernement, peut-être même le gouvernement de Naftali Bennett qui pourtant est un faucon de toute évidence. Les les des paroles qu'a a prononcé Naftali Bennett notamment sur Skynews démontre qu'il a une attitude de faucon, mais peut-être qu'il aurait géré le conflit ou qu'un qu'un de son, un gouvernement avec une majorité autour de lui aurait disons revendiqué des objectifs politiques différents. Alors quels étaient, quels auraient pu être les objectifs politiques déjà du Hamas avec cette opération. Vous savez, Talleyrand, le conseiller diplomatique et le chef de la diplomatie de Napoléon, quand Napoléon avait fait assassiner un noble en exil du côté du du Hanovre, je crois ou du Luxembourg, avait dit plus qu'une erreur, c'est une faute. Plus qu'une erreur, c'est une faute. C'est la même chose avec ce qu'a fait le Hamas. C'est plus qu'une erreur, c'est une faute. C'est abominable, mais de toute façon, on en est aujourd'hui maintenant dans une étape du conflit où les morts s'accumulent des deux côtés et toujours plus du côté palestinien. Mais il se trouve que, en effet, Israël considère que de toute façon, il y a deux milliards de musulmans sur terre et qu'on le voit aujourd'hui bien, on considère que ce n'est pas un conflit, ce n'est pas du tout un conflit israélo-palestinien, c'est un conflit israélo-arabe. Le point de vue d'ailleurs dominant en Israël est que le peuple palestinien n'existe pas. Ce n'est qu'un peuple arabe parmi d'autres. Je ne dis absolument pas que c'est mon point de vue, mais en tout cas, c'est le point de vue qu'il faut comprendre pour comprendre ce conflit et que, en l'occurrence, s'il y a deux milliards d'arabes face à quinze millions d'israéliens, quinze millions de juifs, pas quinze millions d'israéliens, dont la moitié sont aux États-Unis et l'autre moitié en Israël, le troisième pays le plus peuplé en juif au monde, c'est la France, mais c'est de l'ordre de quatre-cent-quatre-vingt-dix-mille, donc c'est vraiment très petit. Et bien, on considère dans ce cas-là que c'est un conflit total engagé avec les pays solidaires des Palestiniens, mais qui sont donc les musulmans et les arabo-musulmans et que la disparité des victimes est une disparité qui est proportionnelle au à la démographie, la démographie qui est d'ailleurs peut-être l'enjeu le plus important de ce conflit aujourd'hui et la raison pour laquelle Netanyahou ne voulait absolument pas avoir l'OLP et le fatah comme interlocuteur. Parce que si l'OLP et le Fatah ont en effet renoncé à la violence de façon nominale et les faits semblent le confirmer, bien Yassera Raffat et d'autres avaient rappelé que c'était le ventre des Palestiniens qui seraient leur grand d'art, mais que dans ce contexte-là, on peut renoncer à la violence si la démographie va donner un rapport de force favorable aux Palestiniens par la suite. Cette déclaration n'était pas tombée dans l'oreille d'un sourd du côté de l'administration Netanyahou qui a considéré d'abord qu'une solution à un État serait une trahison. Et c'est aujourd'hui de très loin l'opinion dominante en Israël, une solution à un État aurait été une trahison. On le voit d'autant plus avec la situation en Afrique du Sud aujourd'hui, où les populations blanches qui ont cédé le pouvoir à la démocratie, bien se retrouvent prises par ce que Bernard Lugand appelle l'ethno mathématique électorale, c'est-à-dire que quand vous avez des groupes ethniques qui votent par solidarité ethnique davantage que pour un programme commun, pour le bien de la nation qui est une volonté de vivre ensemble selon Renan et qui dépasse les ethnies, bien on se retrouve avec un pays où un groupe ethnique, quelques groupes ethniques n'auront plus jamais le pouvoir et c'est ce qui s'est passé en Afrique du Sud. Or les accords de camp David allait dans cette direction vers une solution à un État et c'est la raison pour laquelle Isa K Rabin a été assassiné parce qu'une partie des Israéliens considérait qu'un choc démographique ou en tout cas une guerre démographique aura été imminente, on se serait retrouvé avec une sorte de course à la population entre d'un côté les Haredims, donc littéralement ceux qui tremblent devant Dieu, mais les ultra orthodoxes qui ont eux autour de cet enfant par femme, c'était une démographie à la Gazaoui à l'époque, plus maintenant un Gaza n'a plus cet enfant par femme. Mais aujourd'hui, les Haredim ont autour de cet enfant par femme. Et d'ailleurs, ça crée une disparité politique totale en Israël puisque seront d'ici deux-mille-quarante autour de vingt-cinq pour cent de la population votant israélienne, ce qui garantit un intérêt politique et électorale majeur à solliciter leur électorat et ça, c'est ce n'est non plus pas tomber dans l'oreille d'un sourd pour Netanyahou et sa coalition qui est aujourd'hui la plus populaire auprès des Haredims. Or donc pour Netanyahou, bon pour même l'ensemble d'Israël, une solution à un État aurait été une trahison, pas au moment des accords de camp David dans les années quatre-vingt-dix, mais la réalité des faits en Afrique du Sud a démontré qu'une solution à un État aurait été une trahison pour la majorité des, pardon pour la majorité des israéliens et donc il fallait l'éviter à tout prix. Or c'était la solution, les deux solutions que l'OLP et le Fata amenaient soit une solution à un état encore une fois totalement écartées aujourd'hui, soit une solution à deux États. Mais dans ce cas-là, on revient aux fondamentaux du conflit israélo-palestinien pour ne pas donc dire point de vue israélien, conflit israélo-arabe, à savoir les frontières. Et vous savez on a cette fameuse expérience où on prend des fourmis et on les organise bien comme il faut avec une ligne de front et disons des fourmis rouges et des fourmis noires, elles se font face, mais elles ne s'affrontent pas. Et puis si vous secouez tout ça, vous êtes dans un bocal, vous secouez tout ça, c'est la marave générale, tout le monde meurt et on atteint un conflit qui n'est pas de l'ordre de soixante morts à l'heure. Or, c'est exactement ça les frontières du Moyen-Orient. Si vous voulez comprendre l'équation fondamentale, l'analyser d'un point de vue mathématique en mettant vos émotions de côté, que vous soyez israélien ou palestinien ou arabe ou sensible à la cause palestinienne, sensible à la cause israélienne, si tant est qu'on puisse la présenter comme ça, bien voilà le fond, le fondement absolu de ce conflit que vous devez comprendre. Petit un, les frontières d'Israël sont inacceptables. Petit deux, il y a plus inacceptable que les frontières d'Israël, c'est les frontières de la Palestine et en particulier de la Cisjordanie. Petit trois, il a plus inacceptable que les frontières de la Cisjordanie, c'est les frontières de Gaza. Et donc le destin, la providence ou une géopolitique idiote, mais à ce niveau-là, vous savez, on est quand même sur des capitales religieuses, on va parler de destin de providence ou de test de Dieu. Et le test de Dieu puisque Dieu teste ces peuples, bien c'est d'avoir mis trois frontières inacceptables par ordre décroissant d'inacceptabilité, à savoir les frontières israéliennes qui sont des frontières en décapsuleur, ça ressemble à un décapsuleur qui sont indéfendables, qui sont des frontières inacceptables. Et puis les frontières si jordaniennes qui sont encore plus inacceptables, mais qui, c'est le point de vue israélien, au moins ont à leur dos un état allié, à savoir la Jordanie. C'est vrai que du point de vue israélien, ces frontières-là sont adossées à un État allié, ce qui n'est pas le cas pour Israël, qui n'est adossé en tout cas géopolitiquement à aucun État allié, qui du coup s'est créé des opportunités géopolitiques différentes, en particulier parce que la majorité des Israéliens, pardon des juifs en dehors des frontières israéliennes sont aux États-Unis, il existe donc une alliance qui n'était pas forcément naturelle entre les États-Unis, le pays le plus puissant du monde et Israël. Et cette alliance s'est construite sur le temps puisque du temps d'Eisenhower, les États-Unis envisageaient réellement de s'allier avec les États arabes plutôt qu'avec Israël qui à l'époque était davantage un repère de trotskiste et donc ne semblait pas être un état naturellement allié aux États-Unis. Mais fermant cette parenthèse, on aurait dû avoir un autre arabe, il n'a pas eu lieu et pour le coup, c'est de la faute aux pays arabes, on ne peut pas dire les choses autrement. Mais en tout cas, aujourd'hui, la situation de l'équation, c'est que Israël et les États-Unis sont des alliés absolument solides et c'est pour ça que le Géral Ford et son groupe aéronaval se trouvent aujourd'hui au large d'Israël et puis surtout que les marines s'entraînent au Yémen, donc ça rigole pas. Mais les fondements géopolitiques de la situation, c'est que les frontières d'Israël ne sont pas acceptables. Ce sont des frontières qui sont géopolitiques. Moi, je ne parle pas du tout sur le plan politique. Je ne parle pas sur le plan de la légitimité non plus. Je ne dis pas que ces frontières légitimes ou illégitimes, ils ne sont pas acceptables sur le plan de la légitimité. Non non, je parle simplement sur le plan défensif. Vous n'avez pas d'état musulman qui a des frontières aussi pourries, à part peut-être le Liban, mais le Liban est adossé à des états alliés ou au moins des états qui ne sont pas dangereux comme la vis-à-vis du Liban, comme la Turquie, comme la Syrie, les frontières israéliennes sont toutes pourries. Mais vous avez deux états, deux frontières qui sont encore plus pourries que les siennes, à savoir la Cisjordanie qui a des frontières catastrophiques et surtout aujourd'hui qui n'a plus vraiment de frontière avec les checkpoints, avec les accords de Slow, et caetera. Parle plus vraiment de frontière, on parle d'un archipel. Et Gaza qui de loin dans la région a les frontières les plus pourries et les plus inacceptables de la zone. C'est aussi pour ça d'ailleurs qu'Israël ne veut pas que Gaza devienne un État. Au passage, si Gaza devenait un État, ça pourrait s'envisager, mais faudrait, il aurait fallu le singapouriser, il aurait fallu que ça devienne une sorte de protectorat israélien bancaire avec une super puissance à la Singapour sur la zone, ça c'est complètement utopique. Alors ça ça se rêve. Moi j'adore les utopies. J'adorerais envisager que Gaza devienne un super Monaco dans la région, surtout que maintenant la devise libanaise n'est plus crédible et donc on aurait pu envisager avec énormément d'investissement et en supposant qu'il y ait un abandon total de la violence dans la zone, mais même Israël ne voulait pas ça ou en tout cas même l'administration Netanyahou ne voulait pas ça l'administration Netanyahou désirait davantage avoir le Hamas comme interlocuteur. Alors ce n'était pas vraiment un interlocuteur. Disons que c'était comme comme adversaire, on va le dire plutôt de cette façon-là. Parce que le terrain du Hamas n'est pas un terrain politique. Le Hamas n'est à démontrer à plusieurs reprises son incompétence politique et surtout enfin son incompétence à obtenir des objectifs politiques et sur le terrain politique, les négociations auraient pu amener à la création d'un État palestinien qui tôt ou tard par la force des choses se serait séparé en deux États, Gaza et la Cisjordanie. Comme d'ailleurs quand on a eu la séparation des musulmans en Inde, vous avez eu au départ un seul État pakistanais et ensuite cet État pakistanais s'est coupé en deux avec le Bangladesh d'un côté et le Pakistan de l'autre puisque c'était intenable d'avoir deux espaces aussi éloignés et en l'occurrence, ce sera intenable aussi si jamais on avait un État palestinien qui contrôlait la Cisjordanie et Gaza à la fois. Or, les perspectives de négociation avec un interlocuteur ou un adversaire qui serait l'OLP ou le fatah, aller en droite ligne vers le choix entre solution à un État ou solution à deux États. C'est-à-dire pour le gouvernement Netanyahou, les gouvernements Netanyahou, la peste ou le choléra. Solution à deux états, le choléra, solution à un état la peste. Et donc le calcul politique de Netanyahou a été d'espérer créer des situations ou profiter de situations politiques qui permettraient d'éviter une solution à deux états qui discréditerait politiquement une solution à deux états. Or, le meilleur scénario, dans ce cas-là c'est le Hamas puisque le Hamas alors est un champion pour discréditer une solution à deux États. D'abord parce que le Hamas ne reconnaît pas l'état d'Israël donc considère que c'est la Palestine contrôle toute la zone et les juifs s'évaporent, disparaissent, s'évapore dans voilà, c'est la pensée magique, vous savez c'est, mais c'est la pensée magique a présidé à beaucoup d'aspects du conflit israélo-palestinien, les deux camps ont pendant très longtemps imaginé une situation où l'autre disparaît. Voilà par magie, par magie ou par autre chose. Mais voyons ça comme par magie. Par magie, on se réveille un beau matin, il n'y a plus de juifs en Israël. Par magie, on se réveille un beau matin, n'y a plus de Palestiniens ou d'arabe puisque pour la majorité des Israéliens, les Palestiniens n'existent pas, c'est un peuple inventé. Encore fois, je ne dis absolument pas que c'est mon point de vue, mais il faut comprendre que ce point de vue existe pour comprendre l'opinion et surtout les prochains coups politiques. Parce que maintenant le vrai sujet, c'est de comprendre quels vont être les prochains coups politiques dans ce conflit. Alors je vais être très clair, le calcul politique de l'administration Netanyahou et là je parle aux deux camps, c'est d'obtenir une évacuation totale et définitive de Gaza. Ça, c'est le calcul politique de l'administration Netanyahou. C'est quelque chose qui a été réfléchi et dont l'administration Netanyahou attendait les bonnes conditions pour la mettre en oeuvre, d'autant qu'il faut le reconnaître, Netanyahou est un, est un animal politique redoutable et je parle là aussi bien aux israéliens qu'aux non israéliens et c'est un calculateur remarquable. Et il a, il est capable de transformer des situations géopolitiques ou politiques par former des situations géopolitiques ou politiques parfois très négatives en opportunité. Et l'opportunité qui s'est dessinée pour l'administration Netanyahou aujourd'hui est clairement une opportunité d'évacuer Gaza. Alors, et d'évacuer encore une fois d'évacuer Gaza de façon irréversible, je ne peux pas être plus clair. Et je continue à m'adresser aux deux camps en disant ça. Alors ça peut sembler pour le les camps israéliens, une victoire politique majeure, évacuer Gaza d'une façon irréversible, ça semble être une victoire politique majeure. Et peut-être que ça le serait sur le long terme, peut-être que si jamais Netanyahou l'obtenait, il serait dans les livres d'histoire considérées de façon consensuelle en Israël comme un héros au même titre que Moshe Daïan par exemple pour la conquête de Jérusalem. Mais je dois vous dire dans ce cas-là que c'est un calcul politique extraordinairement dangereux pour Israël, extraordinairement dangereux. Je ne peux pas dire les choses autrement. Et on est au-delà du poker. Est vraiment dans une situation politique qui peut nous amener à une escalade du conflit où le conflit montrait à bien plus en termes de vitesse morbide que soixante morts par jour, là on rentrerait plutôt à soixante kilomètres morts par jour. Et c'est ce point-là que je voulais aborder dans cette vidéo. L'idée, donc Gaza qu'est-ce que c'est C'est une, c'est une des airs les plus densément peuplées au monde et c'est deux millions de personnes. Alors Naftali Bennett a pris des déclarations, notamment sur Skynews et on a d'autres personnes en Israël qui ont pris des déclarations, qui ont pris des déclarations, qui ont pris des déclarations, qui ont pris des déclarations, qui ont pris des déclarations, qui ont pris des notamment sur Sky News et on a d'autres personnes en Israël qui ont pris les déclarations considérant qu'il y a une une responsabilité collective de Gaza pour les attaques terroristes du Hamas. Et ça évidemment, c'est contraire au droit international et à la morale. Mais bon, le droit international au bout d'un moment, ce n'est qu'un rapport de force aujourd'hui, quoi qu'il arrive, le rapport de force fait qu'on a plus de cinq-cent-mille mobilisés côté israélien et que le Hamas ne peut pas mettre sur le pied de guerre plus de cent-mille personnes. Alors après vous avez deux millions de personnes, mais bon qui ne sont pas armées, qui sont majoritairement des jeunes, soixante-cinq pour cent des gazaoui ont moins de vingt-quatre ans et non grandi d'ailleurs que dans le blocus, le blocus qui lui remonte à l'opération plan durci en deux-mille-sept, deux-mille-huit et le blocus commence en deux-mille-sept. L'époque sous l'administration Olmert qui n'envisageait pas Olmert qui est d'ailleurs un ennemi politique juré de Netanyahou, au passage l'Iran vient de déclarer qu'elle a obtenu par ses services secrets des fiches que Netanyahou gardait sur et je crois qu'elle s'apprête à les publier. Alors en tout cas Olmert n'envisageait pas une évacuation totale de Gaza et irréversible. Mais aujourd'hui le calcul de l'administration Netanyahou, c'est celui-là. Et il n'est pas possible d'envisager un vote à la Knesset, même si vous avez la gauche israélienne attaquent Netanyahou, considérablement en pleine guerre et avec cinq-cent-mille mobilisés jusqu'à six-cent-mille au total, ce qui serait la plus grande mobilisation de l'histoire d'Israël au passage. Devant des menaces existentielles bien plus graves, la guerre des 6 jours était une menace existentielle bien plus graves pour Israël, la guerre du Kippour était une menace bien plus grave pour Israël, mais elles n'ont jamais amené une mobilisation pareil. Or cette guerre pourrait dégénérer en guerre du Kippour deux point zéro, en deuxième guerre du Kippour si la solidarité à la cause palestinienne dans le monde arabo-musulman se cristallise et on la voit se cristalliser. Et si elles se cristallisent face à la situation à Gaza, il n'est pas du tout impossible que un dérapage nucléaire est lieu. C'est pour ça que je vous ai dit que là, on rentrerait plutôt sur du six-cents kilomètres à l'heure. En l'occurrence soixante déjà soixante kilomètres c'était Hiroshima ou Nagasaki chacune à l'instant de détonation, mais c'était des bombes a, ce n'était pas des bombes h, pas des bombes thermonucléaires. Le Pakistan possède, est le seul pays musulman qui possède l'arme atomique, et possède, est le seul pays musulman qui possède l'arme atomique et possède des armes thermonucléaires et possède des vecteurs capables de les expédier en Israël. Israël possède au minimum deux cents têtes nucléaires qui sont des têtes thermonucléaires, donc on est de l'ordre de dix mégatonnes minimum, jusqu'à cinquante mégatonnes aujourd'hui avec les technologies disponibles. Et Israël déclare l'option Samson qui est donc que je meurs avec les philistins, c'était d'ailleurs à Gaza que ça s'est passé quand Samson un des juges d'Israël à l'époque donc des juges, a fait s'abattre les colonnes où on l'avait enchaîné et mort avec les Philistins, donc les Palestiniens. Et c'était donc encore une fois à Gaza, l'option Sanson déclare que en cas d'attaque d'Israël, Israël se réserve le droit de créer un hiver nucléaire à l'échelle mondiale. Alors deux cents à quatre cents têtes nucléaires ne sont pas suffisantes pour créer un hiver nucléaire à l'échelle mondiale, mais c'est bien entendu suffisant pour faire des dizaines de millions de morts. Dans ce cas-là, en cas d'escalade nucléaire totale, parce qu'Israël n'est pas le seul pays en réalité revendique une option Samson, la Russie qui est pourtant l'opposé d'Israël d'un point de vue géopolitique puisque c'est le plus grand pays du monde. Israël considère qu'elle doit revendiquer l'option Samson parce que son territoire est tout petit et qu'une invasion classique, peut occuper son territoire très rapidement. Et c'est exact. C'est la raison pour laquelle Moshe Dayan avait créé la doctrine dite du chien enragé, à savoir Israël doit être un chien enragé trop dangereux pour qu'on l'attaque. Parce que c'est une doctrine qui semble complètement délirante, en réalité elle fait sens quand vous avez un tout petit pays qui n'a aucune profondeur stratégique et qui n'a pas de deuxième chance en cas de conflit qui peut se ne se permettre aucune défaite. Alors que la Russie, par exemple, peut se permettre à peu près toutes les défaites qu'elle veut. Et c'est typiquement ce qui s'est passé pendant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, la Russie était l'Union soviétique, qu'elle avait encore plus de territoires, encore plus de profondeurs stratégiques avec la moitié de la Pologne absorbée, la Russie a pu se permettre un très grand nombre de défaites et gagner la guerre. Rome, pendant les guerres puniques, a pu se permettre un très grand nombre de défaites et gagner les guerres puniques, Israël ne peut se permettre aucune défaite. C'est une de ces constantes géopolitiques, en tout cas dans une guerre conventionnelle, Israël ne peut se permettre aucune défaite. Et c'est pour ça que la doctrine du chien enragé a existé. Cependant, c'est la doctrine du chien enragé qui fait qu'Israël n'a jamais de réponse proportionnée, jamais. Mais ça, c'était le cas pendant la guerre des 6 jours où il y avait une coalition, une coordination et une menace existentielle réelle, c'était le cas, le cas pendant la guerre du Kippour où il y avait une menace existentielle plausible, mais là en l'occurrence, à aucun moment les attaques du Hamas, toutes barbares qu'elles fussent, n'ont pu constituer une menace existentielle envers Israël. À aucun moment, il faut être très clair avec ça. C'est très dur de garder son son sang-froid. Et pourtant, c'est littéralement ce qu'il faut faire aussi bien au poker que dans une situation où le ou les jetons qu'on perd sont des vies humaines de part et d'autre. Et encore une fois Israël ne ne comment dire, ne compte pas les vies humaines dans l'absolu, mais dans le relatif. Ça, c'est un point et il n'est pas possible un non israélien de comprendre l'attitude d'Israël et je ne parle pas de l'excuser, je ne parle pas de la juger, je parle de la comprendre et de l'anticiper puisqu'on atteint dans cette situation, dans ce conflit, une situation où il faut uniquement comprendre ce qui est prévisible, qui est, quel est le prochain coût de tel ou tel acteur Que vous le considériez comme un adversaire ou pas, que vous soyez neutre ou pas. Il faut comprendre que Israël considère fondamentalement ses pertes d'un point de vue relatif, c'est-à-dire en pourcentage de la population juive mondiale qui est de l'ordre de quinze millions. Et que après appeler ça comme du cynisme ou appeler ça comme vous voulez, considère que les pertes palestiniennes sont des pertes musulmanes et qu'il y a deux milliards de musulmans dans le monde et que relativement aux pertes israéliennes, et bien même si vous faites un facteur, donc c'est un facteur de cent-trente-trois, quinze millions par rapport à deux milliards, c'est un facteur de cent-trente-trois. Et d'ailleurs ça vous donne à peu près le différentiel des pertes quand vous avez un conflit dans la zone entre musulmans et israéliens. Le consensus en Israël, c'est que parce que, ça c'est un fait, ce n'est pas un consensus, parce que Israël est le seul État juif, comprenez, il n'y a pas d'État farades, il n'y a pas d'état ashkénaz, il n'y a pas d'état falacha. Il n'y a pas d'état pour les juifs laïcs pour ne pas dire athée puisque vous avez des juifs athées aussi bizarre que ça puisse paraître. Et alors qu'il y a des États avec des sunnites, des États avec des chiites, des États avec toutes les diversités possibles des fois musulmanes et donc parce que et ça c'est un fait, il n'existe qu'un seul État juif, le consensus en Israël est que les pertes juives sont à considérer comme unifiée que c'est le problème du monde musulman s'il n'a pas pu unifier ces deux milliards de musulmans, mais c'est un conflit entre israéliens et tous les solidaires des arabo musulmans. Et encore une fois, il ne s'agit ni de juger ni d'excuser, il s'agit de comprendre et il s'agit d'anticiper. Parce que rien n'est plus important que l'anticipation pour savoir si cette guerre peut dégénérer en guerre de très haute intensité, à savoir aujourd'hui, on a des scènes de rue au Pakistan qui est donc une puissance est la seule puissance nucléaire musulmane, qui sont extrêmement préoccupantes. Et la situation dans le blocus de Gaza risque d'amener une telle solidarité. D'ailleurs l'Iran l'a déjà revendiqué. Même si j'insiste, je considère que l'Iran n'était absolument pas derrière les attaques du Hamas. Mais maintenant, l'Iran est obligé de revendiquer cette solidarité. L'Iran n'est pas encore nucléaire et il existait des moyens d'empêcher la nucléarisation de l'Iran. Mais l'Iran est une nation de scientifiques et d'ingénieurs avec d'excellents mathématiciens par exemple. Et l'Iran peut obtenir la bombe de façon assez rapide. En fait elle pourrait si elle ne l'a pas déjà, parce qu'il est possible qu'elle l'ait déjà, mais dans ce cas-là, elle n'a pas fait de test nucléaire, d'essai nucléaire, puisqu'on ne peut pas comme ça juste lancer, il faut faire un essai nucléaire. Même les américains quand ils ont créé le projet Manhattan, ont fait un essai nucléaire avec le gadget et l'Iran n'a pas mené d'essai nucléaire. Donc ça signifie alors que le Pakistan aussi, ça signifie qu'en admettant que l'Iran possède l'arme nucléaire, elle n'a pas aujourd'hui la garantie d'une frappe crédible. Par contre, il faut comprendre aussi que les conséquences d'une évacuation définitive de Gaza irréversible de Gaza seraient très certainement une course nucléaire de tous les États voisins d'Israël. Et là, je parle aussi bien aux Israéliens qu'aux non israéliens. Parce que d'autres administrations que l'administration Netanyahu, ce n'est pas moi qui le dit, c'est arrête, aurait très certainement gérer la situation d'une façon politique différemment. Parce que j'insiste, quelles que soient les atrocités commises à aucun moment les attaques du Hamas non constituées et n'aurait constitué et ne pouvait constituer une menace existentielle pour Israël à aucun moment. Le Hamas, oui, revendique que l'avenir qu'il recherche est un avenir sans Israël, c'est ce qui n'est plus le cas de l'OLP et du Fatah. Mais le hammassi, mais cependant le hammassi n'a à aucun moment les moyens d'atteindre cet objectif ou cette revendication ou ce rêve autrement que par une sorte de voeu pieux morbide. Alors qu'une évacuation totale de Gaza est irréversible, peut créer des situations qui constitueraient une menace existentielle pour Israël. Je peux et je vais le répéter. Une gestion des attaques du Hamas, différentes qui n'auraient pas à déboucher sur une évacuation totale et irréversible de Gaza, n'aurait pas créé une situation capable de mettre Israël face à une menace existentielle réelle. Alors quelles auraient été d'ailleurs ces façons de gérer la situation froidement, ça aurait été certes un blocus de Gaza, certes des frappes sur Gaza et puis des ultimatums et un délai et puis des échanges de prisonniers, et puis en effet l'exigence de se voir remettre tel ou tel leader. Et puis après des assassinats ciblés dont le Mossad est tout à fait capable. Un assassinat sur Haled Meschal, une tentative sur Haled Meshal avait déjà eu lieu d'ailleurs, je crois par les oreilles comme dans Hamlet avec un poison, je crois que c'était de l'opium concentré ou un opioïde concentré. Et cette cette tentative d'assassinat n'avait pas été menée d'une façon disons suffisamment professionnelle, les assassins avaient été retenus en otage par le et lequel avait pu obtenir l'antidote, c'est pour ça que Haled Meshan est encore en vie aujourd'hui et c'est pour ça qu'il est au Qatar. Mais durant les le massacre de Munich et dans d'autres situations, Israël avait parfaitement démontré sa capacité à mener des assassinats en rétorsion. Et en l'occurrence, ça aurait été une réponse graduée et proportionnée, mais vous me diriez non, Israël ne doit pas avoir de réponse graduée et proportionnée parce que fondamentalement, il y a quinze millions de juifs dans le monde, mais de, mais deux milliards de musulmans et la situation est telle que tous les musulmans pour certains israéliens sont des ennemis potentiels. Mais au-delà de ça, parce que Israël est un tout petit territoire et doit donc ne jamais respecter le principe d'une riposte graduée, certes sauf que là en l'occurrence aucune menace existentielle, j'insiste, quelle que soit les atrocités commises, il n'existait aucune menace existentielle sur l'état d'Israël, aucune existentiel, je parle. Et dans ce cas-là, quand aucune menace existentielle n'est manifestée, il faut adopter une riposte graduée. Même si politiquement elle peut être insatisfaisante pour le peuple. Et là je parle du peuple israélien. Même si elle peut être insatisfaisante parce que le peuple crie vengeance et dit c'est inacceptable d'avoir eu trois-mille morts dans les circonstances que que l'on a vu et donc nous voulons une réponse immédiate et disproportionnée. Le problème donc est que cette réponse disproportionnée d'une part. Et l'objectif politique que recherche le gouvernement Netanyahou d'autre part et qui n'est jamais passé devant la Knesset parce que s'il était passé devant la Knesset, il aurait susciter une indignation aussi bien de la gauche israélienne, que de tout le monde arabo-musulman. Et il n'aurait pas pu être, disons maintenu dans une certaine confidentialité. Mais alors pour quelque raison politique que ce soit, je ne sais pas si c'est parce que Netanyahou souhaite rentrer dans l'histoire. Après tout son parti a été créé par Ariel Sharon et Ariel Sharon est de l'école de Moshe Dalian et Moshe Dalian est rentré dans l'histoire israélienne, je ne sais pas vous dire pour quelle raison particulière je suis convaincu de ce que Netanyahou et son administration recherchent l'objectif politique suprême qui est l'évacuation totale de Gaza et encore une fois irréversible. Mais ce que je peux vous dire, c'est que ça, ça peut créer une situation qui va engendrer une menace existentielle pour Israël. Et la menace existentielle n'est pas épargnée par le fait que Israël maintienne l'option sans son. À savoir si nous sommes attaqués, nous avons entre deux-cents et quatre-cent-mille ogives pardon deux-cents et quatre-cents ogives nucléaires et nous pouvons créer une destruction inacceptable. C'est quelque chose qui est, qui se considère entre états industrialisés, occidentaux, une destruction inacceptable. Peut-être qu'il est tout à fait sous-estimé par un certain corps en Israël, ce que le monde arabo-musulman considère comme inacceptable. Par exemple la destruction du dôme du rocher et de la mosquée d'Al-Aqsa pour la construction du troisième temple, dans quelle mesure ce sera considéré comme inacceptable par le monde arabo-musulman Très personnellement, je n'en sais rien. Mais on a une partie du monde arabo-musulman qui est jeune et dans cette partie, on a une partie qui n'a pas grand-chose à perdre. Je pense notamment à l'Irak puisque la la doctrine américaine du chaos contrôlé a créé des États musulmans comme la Somalie, comme l'Irak, de plus en plus comme le Yémen, qui comme l'Afghanistan, qui considèrent qu'ils n'ont rien à perdre. Et dans ce contexte-là, n'avoir rien à perdre, ça signifie ne plus être inquiété par l'option sans sens. Et une partie du monde arabo-musulman qui ne serait plus inquiété par l'option sans sang et qui rentrerait dans une course nucléaire. Alors encore une fois l'Iran, si elle n'a pas déjà l'arme nucléaire, peut posséder l'arme nucléaire en 6 mois. C'est à peu près le temps qu'il faut à l'Iran aujourd'hui en supposant qu'elle n'ait pas l'arme nucléaire pour s'armer nucléaire et elle a toutes les capacités de frapper en Israël si elle le souhaite. Alors certes, Tramenei a déclaré soi-disant, disant, il l'a déclaré une fatwa disant que l'arme nucléaire n'était pas halal. Bon, mais qu'est-ce que ça vaut en géopolitique ça Et et de toute façon le Pakistan possède l'arme nucléaire, avec des vecteurs capables de frapper Israël. Alors certes le Pakistan aujourd'hui est dirigé par une élite militaire est elle-même sous un contrôle de facto, disons de la CIA pour simplifier un peu la situation, mais c'est à peu près la situation actuelle. Donc évidemment, tant qu'on a une élite militaire qui est sous contrôle de la CIA pour le dire de façon un peu crue et simple, c'est plus subtil que ça, mais on ne peut pas envisager que le Pakistan entre dans des des comportements suicidaires. Mais bon. Et là, ce que je veux dire aux Israéliens, parce que si j'ai préservé le privilège de parler à tous les camps dans cette vidéo, c'est que la poursuite de l'objectif politique, d'une évacuation irréversible de Gaza. Comme façon de gérer cette situation, cette guerre, parce que c'est une guerre. Peut-être qu'une autre administration aurait, enfin je ne sais pas peut-être j'en suis persuadé, une autre administration aurait poursuivi des objectifs politiques différents. Mais l'administration Netanyahou est bien entendu totalement opposée à une solution à un État, même moi maintenant j'y suis opposé. Je considère que la situation en Afrique du Sud démontre qu'il n'existe pas de maturité humaine suffisante pour obtenir une telle utopie avec éventuellement des garde-fous constitutionnels, et caetera. La solution à deux états, l'administration Netanyahu y est complètement opposée aussi. Et donc la solution tout court, c'est une évacuation de Gaza. Et plus tard, n'en doutez pas une seule seconde de la Cisjordanie, doutez pas, c'est ce qui va arriver. Et aujourd'hui, le monde arabo-musulman l'anticipe pour ne pas dire l'appréhende d'une façon extrêmement dangereuse. Raison pour laquelle vous avez eu des mouvements de plusieurs dizaines de milliers de personnes de la Jordanie vers la Cisjordanie qui ont été arrêtés par les autorités jordaniennes. Raison pour laquelle ces mouvements ont eu lieu. Et attendez-vous à ce que ces mouvements aient lieu davantage. Si jamais cet objectif politique continue à être poursuivi. Pour l'heure, l'ère la plus urbanisée de la bande de Gaza est déjà évacuée. Donc plus de la moitié du travail est fait, est fait. Puisque l'urbanisme de la bande de Gaza, même si c'est la une des zones les plus densément peuplées au monde, cet urbanisme et très essentiellement tourné vers le nord et évacuer la ville de Gaza, c'est déjà évacuer plus de soixante pour cent de l'urbanisme de la bande de Gaza dans son intégralité. Bien, je ne peux insister suffisamment pour mes interlocuteurs israéliens sur le fait que d'une situation dans laquelle il n'existait pas de menaces existentielles pour l'État d'Israël. On obtient par la poursuite de l'objectif politique qui est une évacuation totale d'abord de Gaza, mais ensuite certainement de la Cisjordanie. On va obtenir une situation géopolitique mondiale dans laquelle les menaces existentielles pour Israël n'auront jamais été aussi grandes depuis au moins la guerre des 6 jours, au moins. Et là on parlera de menaces nucléaires. C'est-à-dire que quand par exemple certaines personnes au Pakistan se posaient la question de l'utilisation de l'arme atomique, je ne pense pas qu'il pensait très souvent à Israël par le passé. Mais je ne peux que vous confirmer que si la bande de Gaza est évacuée de façon irréversible, certaines personnes au Pakistan vont y penser de plus en plus souvent. Et certaines personnes en Iran vont y penser de plus en plus souvent. Et certaines personnes en Arabie saoudite vont y penser de plus en plus souvent. Parce que oui, l'Arabie saoudite a les moyens de s'armer nucléairement si personne ne l'en empêche. L'Égypte a les moyens de s'armer nucléairement sur le plan scientifique, elle a les moyens d'enrichir de l'uranium. Construire des centrifugeuses est certes difficiles d'un point de vue confidentiel, mais bon si vous le faites délibérément et que vous avez un grand frère nucléaire qui est disposé à vous protéger d'une première attaque, qu'est ce qui peut bien vous en empêcher C'est le cas de la Corée du Nord. Rien n'a empêché la Corée du Nord de s'armer nucléairement, rien du tout. Et aujourd'hui plus rien n'empêche l'Iran de s'armer nucléairement. Plus rien n'empêchera l'Arabie saoudite de s'armer nucléairement. Plus rien n'empêchera l'Égypte de s'armer nucléairement. Et dans ce contexte-là, je suis convaincu de ce que l'administration Netanyahou sous-estime totalement les conséquences d'une évacuation irréversible de gaza, j'en suis absolument convaincu. Et ces conséquences vont par la force des choses, créer un monde, un avenir dans lequel les menaces existentielles pour l'État d'Israël seront beaucoup plus grandes. Et je ne peux pas vous dire les choses autrement. Et là je revendique le droit et le privilège de m'adresser aux juifs et en particulier aux israéliens. Et je sais que ce sont des débats qui ne se font pas à la CNESET et qui sont inenvisageables à la CNESET de toute façon. Mais ce sont des débats qui sont aujourd'hui nécessaires par le fait accompli. C'est-à-dire que le fait accompli aujourd'hui, c'est que l'administration Netanyahou a besoin d'une évacuation de Gaza rapide. Pourquoi rapide Parce que plus la situation dure, plus les risques d'escalade du conflit sont grandes, son grand et plus une deuxième guerre du Kippour devient probable. Raison pour laquelle le porte-avions Gérald Ford est déployé dans la zone. Parce que plus la situation à Gaza devient un drame humanitaire, ce qui s'accélère évidemment de jour en jour puisque l'eau est coupée alors on ne peut que subodorer que les gazaouis avaient mis en place des moyens d'approvisionnement souterrains en eau par l'Égypte, et l'Égypte aujourd'hui adresse un convoi humanitaire à Gaza, mais qui est bloqué par Israël. Mais en admettant même que la bande de Gaza possède des moyens de s'approvisionner en eau de façon indépendante d'Israël. C'est une situation qui ne peut durer que quelques semaines et qui ne peut qu'aboutir à des conséquences de type la valise ou le cercueil. Alors dans l'histoire, oui, il y a eu de telles conséquences pour beaucoup de peuples et beaucoup de villes, que ce soit Rhodes, que ce soit Istanbul, Constantinople, que ce soit toutes ces villes qui ont été évacuées pendant les invasions mongoles ou autres, et qui parfois n'ont même pas eu le luxe de la valise, et qui n'avaient le choix que du cercueil. Et je sais, je sais qu'une une certaine frange au Moyen-Orient considère que le peuple juif ayant vécu des dizaines d'événements, valises au cercueil dans son histoire, considère que pour les gazaoui, ce n'est qu'un seul événement dans une ère relativement civilisée où il ne risquerait pas la mort dans le pays où il trouverait refuge. Quelle que soit la façon dont on considère ce point de vue abominable ou cynique, il ne peut mener qu'à des conséquences extrêmement dangereuses. Non pas pour les Palestiniens, mais pour Israël. Alors on a parlé des armes de destruction massive. Et de leur prolifération inévitable dans le monde arabo-musulman, la bande de Gaza venait à être évacuée de façon irréversible. De façon très il n'y a qu'un seul pays nucléaire aujourd'hui dans le monde arabo-musulman. Il y en aura beaucoup plus d'ici vingt ans ou même dix ans, si la bande de gaza est évacuée de façon irréversible. Et encore plus, encore plus si le dôme du rocher et la mosquée d'Alaxa venaient à être détruites pour la construction du troisième temple. Alors que le peuple juif est un peuple par la force des choses extrêmement intelligent puisque on pourrait dire d'une façon cynique qu'avec tous les programmes qu'il a connus, tous les idiots sont morts par la force des choses. C'est-à-dire que seuls les paranoïaques, les dépressifs et les gens très intelligents qui sont très souvent d'ailleurs paranoïaque et dépressifs aussi, survivre dans ces événements et un peuple très intelligent doit pouvoir trouver des solutions très intelligentes et pas seulement des solutions brutes de décoffrage ou des solutions frontales, des solutions directes ou des solutions dignes de ce que ces ennemis auraient pu calculer ou envisager ou planifier. Et peut-être qu'un peuple de mathématiciens, de prix Nobel et de médailles Fields, qu'un peuple qui a parmi lui des Einstein et des Furstenberg, pourrait, saurait trouver une solution architecturale hautement brillante, par laquelle un troisième temple pourrait être érigé tout en maintenant l'existence du dôme du rocher et de la mosquée d'Alaxa, mais pour toute utopiste que je sois, j'ai de très sérieux doutes. Mais dans ce cas-là, je ne peux qu'anticiper en tant que géopolitologue, un avenir dans lequel le monde arabo-musulman va s'armer arme de destruction massive et va être en position de canaliser le désespoir auprès d'une certaine jeunesse, que cela va engendrer. Parce qu'on considère en contre-insurrection que quand on tue un civil, on crée entre trois et sept combattants. Que quand on tue un civil, on crée entre trois et sept combattants et que donc à chaque, et c'est le calcul que le Hamas lui-même va faire, à chaque civil tué à Gaza entre trois et sept combattants supplémentaires pourraient être recrutés par cette entité. Mais l'administration Netanyahou considère certainement que si tout ce problème est déporté sur la sur l'Égypte, bien les velléités meurtrières du Hamas seront un problème pour les égyptiens. Et qu'après tout l'Égypte est un pays de cent-neuf, je crois millions d'habitants et que ce ne sont pas deux millions d'habitants supplémentaires changer dramatiquement sa démographie. Cependant que l'Égypte considérait même limiter les naissances parce qu'elle est bien au courant du fait que sa démographie est déjà excessive. Et Al-Sissi a envisagé, a évoqué en conseil des ministres à plusieurs reprises, une politique de limitation des naissances du type chinoise, alors qu'aujourd'hui aussi bien au Caire qu'à Alexandrie, la jeunesse égyptienne vit parfois dans des cimetières par manque d'habitat, deux millions de gazaoui en Égypte, ce serait de nature à déstabiliser durablement l'Égypte, ce d'autant plus que le Hamas est une organisation intégrées aux frères musulmans, lesquels sont les ennemis du gouvernement actuel et du pouvoir actuel en Égypte. Et lesquelles avait assassiné le président Sadate considérant qu'il avait été trop conciliant avec Israël alors que le président Sadate vous ne pouvez pas être vraiment considéré comme conciliant vis-à-vis d'Israël, surtout dans les détails vestimentaires, notamment du choix de ses cravates, avec sa rencontre avec Goldamayer, mais je ne rentrerai pas dans les détails. Alors il est clair que l'administration Netanyahou considère qu'elle peut politiquement faire d'une pierre deux coups en évacuant totalement Gaza, puisque ça déstabilisera l'Égypte. Oui, ça va la déstabiliser d'une façon durable. Avec des conséquences qui sont complètement imprévisibles. Aidons même des gens aussi intelligents que des Furstenberg ou des Einstein ne pourraient anticiper les conséquences, j'en suis absolument convaincu. Parce que là, on parle vraiment de chaos dans le sens mathématique du terme et même un Einstein et même ne peut pas anticiper, comprendre, prédire le chaos. À partir de là, les conditions de la sécurité d'Israël seront forcément détériorées par la force des choses, pas forcément par une volonté politique sous-jacente coordonnée, mais par la force des choses. En cas d'exode de Gaza. Alors encore une fois, après avoir parlé des armes de destruction massive, je voudrais conclure un peu sur des armes de construction massive. Et je voudrais essayer d'envisager autre chose que des méga morts, d'avoir commencé cette vidéo en rappelant qu'on a atteint un régime morbide de croisière, une vitesse de croisière de soixante morts par heure et qu'on risque d'atteindre soixante kilomètres par heure ou plus, si jamais les choses dégénèrent, cependant d'ailleurs que l'OTAN mène des exercices nucléaires à l'heure où je parle avec l'exercice Ted fast Noun dans la région et que la Russie a son arsenal nucléaire en alerte depuis longtemps, depuis au moins le début de la guerre en Ukraine. Et que très certainement le Pakistan a son arsenal nucléaire en alerte aussi, essayons d'envisager un futur où seraient déployés non pas des armes de destruction massive, mais des armes de construction non pas un complexe militaro-industriel, mais un complexe pacico-industriel. Supposons que l'Égypte soit amenée par un bras de fer, un bras de fer à la fois humanitaire, diplomatique et militaire, à accepter un exode irréversible de Gaza. Alors faisons fille du fait que l'Égypte serait considérée comme une traîtresse la cause palestinienne dans tout le monde arabo-musulman, que ce serait une situation politique ingérable, que des émeutes auraient lieu, que un renversement du pouvoir égyptien serait quasiment certain. Supposons que le pouvoir égyptien se maintienne après avoir accepté un exode irréversible de toute la bande de Gaza. Alors soit on on se retrouvait avec un village de tentes de la taille de Paris, puisque Paris, c'est deux millions d'habitants entre Amuros et Gaza aussi. C'est quelque chose que les russes n'ont jamais envisagé, par exemple en Ukraine. Et à raison, si les russes avaient envisagé de proposer à Kiev une ville certes plus grande et plus peuplée que Paris. L'alternative de la valise ou du cercueil, à très juste titre, les russes auraient été considérés comme des barbares. C'est une des raisons pour laquelle Poutine a déclaré que le siège de Gaza était comparable au siège de Leningrad. Mais à Leningrad, il existait des possibilités encore de lever de ce siège pour Gaza, difficile d'en voir à l'heure actuelle. En admettant que que la l'Égypte se retrouve par accepter deux millions de gazaouis sur son territoire, plusieurs scénarios seraient possibles. Le monde arabo-musulman pourrait se cotiser pour ériger une ville flamboyante, qu'il pourrait appeler par provocation délibérée, parce que toutes les autres conséquences dont je vous parlais demeureraient la frustration, la haine, la rage et la course aux armements nucléaires inévitable de pays musulmans adjacents. Donc la provocation serait un désir politique certain. Maintenant dans quoi pourrait se canaliser cette provocation on a des cas comparables en Asie, elles pourraient se canaliser dans la construction et dans la compétition économique. On verrait un mouvement de boycott, de désinvestissement et de sanctions dans le monde arabo-musulman qui serait à mon avis inébranlable. Et on verrait une volonté au minimum de compétition économique avec Israël tout aussi inébranlable. Cette compétition économique pourrait se traduire par la construction d'une sorte de nouveau Dubaï destiné aux aux palestiniens, destiné aux gazaouis. Et bien entendu par provocation, l'Égypte par consensus arabe, voire arabo-musulman pourrait l'appeler New Gaza. Et pourrait, pour poursuivre la provocation à très long terme, renommer le Sinaï, la grande Palestine. C'est tout à fait envisageable. De la même façon que les grecs ont appelé l'Italie, la grande Grèce et qu'il y avait bien entendu une Grande-Bretagne. Toujours par provocation et pour montrer et là je parle de la perception du monde arabo-musulman encore une fois pour préserver ce privilège de parler à toutes les parties, je ne juge absolument pas, je ne juge absolument pas, je ne peux que le répéter. Je n'essaye que d'anticiper et de comprendre des conséquences prévisibles et des conséquences plausibles ou inévitables selon moi. Et dans ce cas-là, la frustration accumulée dans le monde arabo-musulman pourrait d'une part l'unifier, ce qui est sa grande faiblesse même si vous considérez les écrits, les traditions prophétiques dans le monde musulman, les hadiths rapportent qu'il est demandé à Dieu de ne pas opposer d'ennemis extérieur au monde musulman, alors c'est à hadith de contester, mais Dieu répond, rien ne se produit sans ma volonté. Mais je vous confirme que vos ennemis seront intérieurs, seront la division. Et Dieu en effet teste tous ces peuples et les grands tests des peuples musulmans et encore une fois, le point de vue israélien est de dire mais si vous n'avez pas votre Oumma, c'est par votre propre stupidité, c'est par votre propre bêtise. Et nous, nous sommes affûtés par les pogroms, par les exterminations, par deux mille ans de haine, nous sommes affûtés et ça fait que nous ne sommes pas assez stupides pour nous entretuer et que nous ne sommes pas assez stupides pour nous diviser même si nous avons les falashas, les séfarades, les ashkhenazes et les laïcs. Même si nous avons cela, nous ne sommes pas assez stupides pour nous entretuer, mais si vous, votre propre Oumma est assez stupide pour s'entretuer, c'est votre problème, ce n'est pas le nôtre. Bien dans ce cas-là, la fédération et la solidité politico-religieuses de la Oumma, atteindrait un niveau de cohérence sans précédent dans son histoire, sans précédent. Par exemple, l'Égypte et l'Arabie saoudite et même l'Iran pourraient convoquer un sommet dans le Sinaï et ce sommet pourrait être une expression de leur haute résolution à fédérer la Oumma. Autour de la cause perdue puisque déportée palestinienne. Et ce point de fédération pourrait être redoutablement dangereux. Il est tout à fait envisageable, surtout s'ils lui sont érigés des symboles comme la ville de New Gaza et comme la déclaration de ce que le Sinaï est la grande Palestine. D'ailleurs une toute petite partie du Sinaï et bien dans le territoire de la Palestine historique. Et il existe en fait si vous faites une image miroir de la ville de Gaza, des villes de Gaza, mais de la bande de Gaza, vous vous trouvez encore dans un territoire de Palestine historique. Le territoire, donc évidemment la Palestine, certes un terme donné par Adrien, mais un terme qui vient au départ des, terme lui qui vient des égyptiens et qui est un terme certes d'envahisseurs, les peuples de la mer pendant l'effondrement de l'âge de bronze. Or, l'identité politique et la territorialité politique d'Israël, des royaumes d'Israël datent de l'âge du fer, pas de l'âge du bronze. Et avant il existait des royaumes et des cités qui sont d'ailleurs les inventeurs de l'alphabet. Et l'alphabet hébreu encore aujourd'hui utilisé en Israël est un alphabet qui tire ses origines de l'alphabet, cananéanite, c'est un alphabet que ne connaissait pas Abraham et que ne connaissait pas Moïse. Un alphabet que ne connaissait pas Moïse. C'est un alphabet qui est arrivé pendant les royaumes d'Israël avec la popularisation des alphabets autour des canites, des phéniciens qui sont si on veut vraiment parler de la primauté sur cette terre, le peuple qui était dans cette zone avant le peuple juif. Mais peuple juif pourra répondre légitimement, vous avez déjà une nation, c'est le Liban, le descendant des phéniciens. Et même si le Liban est plus petit qu'Israël, ses frontières plus acceptable puisqu'il est moins entouré d'ennemis, ok. Je ne juge pas, je ne conclus pas là-dessus, je rapporte des débats et je maintiens mon privilège de m'adresser à toutes les parties. Le monde arabo-musulman pourrait décider de créer une sorte de Venise palestinienne ou de pétra palestinienne puisque pétra est la Venise arabe, la Batéenne arabe. Qu'est-ce que c'était Venise C'était un camp de réfugiés. C'était un camp pour éviter, pour réfugier des invasions lombardes, kippillaient, violet, éventré et la lagune de Venise infestée de malaria, frigorifique en hiver, un enfer sur terre brûlant en été, gelées en hiver, était préférable aux invasions lombardes. Et les vénitiens on fait de ce camp de réfugiés, la plus belle ville du monde. Une ville sublime, qui est d'ailleurs la ville où le mot ghetto a été inventé, puisque c'était une fonderie de cuivre, le jeto, qui est devenu le ghetto. Et encore aujourd'hui, les juifs sont heureux à Venise. C'est certes Napoléon qui a brisé le ghetto, mais aujourd'hui, les juifs vivent en parfaite harmonie à Venise. Et d'ailleurs les quartiers juifs sont assez magnifiques à Venise. Bien un geste de défiance par la construction massive. Un geste dans lequel le monde arabo-musulman pourrait canaliser sa défiance en cas d'évacuation irréversible de Gaza pourrait être la construction d'une New Gaza pourrait être l'appel au financement symbolique hautement politique de tous les pays musulmans, de l'Indonésie jusqu'au Maroc en passant par la Somalie l'Afghanistan et le Pakistan, l'Iran et l'Arabie saoudite. La levée de sommes colossales. Après tout, le projet de Neom en Arabie Saoudite devait lever cinq-cent milliards. Et bien le monde arabo-musulman pourrait lever une telle somme au nom de la construction d'une nouvelle Gaza. Et au nom de la revendication de ce que le Sinaï, qui est la terre où Moïse a reçu les tables de la loi, et bien que le Sinaï soit appelé grande Palestine. Et que cette new Gaza, pour des raisons de défiance, soit construite avec des gratte-ciel antisismiques, puisque la zone est sismique, qui aurait vu sur l'ancienne Gaza, avec une sorte de principe érigé en architecture, comme disent les québécois, je me souviens et que cette nouvelle Gaza dans sa grande Palestine aurait comme slogan, je me souviens et que les égyptiens créerait des chansons qui seraient à répéter sur le même modèle que par exemple le Am Israël haï, c'est une possibilité. Elle est bien moins pire, bien moins mauvaise, bien moins désastreuse que la possibilité d'une guerre nucléaire totale et que l'emploi d'armes de destruction massive soit cette année, cette année par exemple juive, donc jusqu'à dans plusieurs mois encore, soit jusqu'à dans une dizaine d'années. La perspective que le monde arabo-musulman canalise sa frustration et son indignation dans des armes de construction massive plutôt que de destruction massive. Avec un objectif politique de défiance affirmé New Gaza Grande Palestine et puis une ville sublime superbe et caetera. Une ville qui aurait pour but de démontrer la supériorité économique, culturelle, politique et religieuse du monde arabo-musulman désormais unifiée autour de cette cause célèbre. Si je dois m'adresser aux israéliens, je dois vous dire très clairement, et je sais que vous êtes mobilisés et je sais que j'ai gagné le droit de m'adresser à toutes les parties et à vous en particulier. Cet avenir-là sera un avenir où les menaces existentielles pour Israël demeureront plus grandes qu'avant, mais moins grandes qu'un avenir où vous avez une course à l'armement nucléaire systématique en Égypte, en Arabie saoudite, en Iran et en Turquie, parce que la Turquie est un pays musulman et que elle sera outragée par un tel événement de façon durable. Je sais que des juifs ont vécu des dizaines de fois dans leur existence des événements de type valise ou cercueil et que vous considérez que parce que cela vous est arrivé, cela arrivera à d'autres. Mais la question n'est pas celle de la légitimité, du droit ou de l'équivalence, c'est-à-dire nous l'avons beaucoup vécu et nous avons survécu alors vous vous en remettrez. Ce qui est de façon certaine, la pensée qui domine dans l'administration d'Etanyahou aujourd'hui. Sans ni la juger ni l'excuser, il faut comprendre les conséquences qu'elle va engendrer. Et j'ai essayé dans cette vidéo de vous donner un panorama de ses conséquences ou plutôt un oligorama puisque pan en grec ça veut dire tout et je ne peux absolument pas prétendre avoir cerné toutes les conséquences, d'une d'un exode de Gaza irréversible et ensuite d'une éventuelle destruction du dôme du rocher et de la mosquée d'Alexa. Qui serait au passage, en admettant un exode systématique des palestiniens qui demeureraient des objets architecturaux de grandes valeurs dans un patrimoine israélien et dont je sais que beaucoup d'israéliens considéreraient que la destruction serait une un anathème, une horreur. Mais de la même façon que l'évacuation irréversible de Gaza, j'en suis convaincu, il n'aurait jamais fait l'unanimité à la et encore moins consensus. Même pas l'unanimité, même pas le consensus. Il est possible que les événements dont je vous parle on n'aurait pas fait consensus non plus. Mais la force des choses permet d'établir des faits accomplis. Et c'est ce que nous voyons à Gaza aujourd'hui. Et c'est ce que nous verrons encore. Et là, je m'adresse aux Israéliens. En conclusion, je je ne peux qu'espérer et prier, ce que nous parlons entre croyants, que ce conflit va ralentir en termes de nombre de morts par jour. Parce que ça a dit, Shiraz a dit les êtres humains font partie d'un tout où ils sont constitués d'une seule essence et d'une seule âme. Et si l'un d'entre eux souffre tous ils souffriront. Et si tu n'as pas de considération pour la souffrance humaine, tu ne mérites pas de t'appeler humain. C'est inscrit dans le Hall of Nations des Nations unies, lesquelles hélas montrent encore une fois leur grande inutilité. Ou en tout cas la grande déception par rapport aux attentes que les peuples pouvaient légitimement avoir d'elle. Je ne peux qu'espérer que ce conflit n'entrera pas dans une intensité irréversible et dans une machine à broyer les âmes et les hommes et les humains, qui excèdera les soixante kilos morts par jour aujourd'hui nous sommes à soixante morts par jour, pardon par heure, par heure. Indiscriminés comme dans les guerres totales où des civils mourraient aussi bien pendant la Deuxième Guerre mondiale, les russes ont eu plus de morts civiles que militaires. Nous nous étions dit à l'époque collectivement, en plus jamais ça. Pour l'instant, ce sont soixante morts par heure, qui rejoignent le ciel, la situation pourrait dégénérer de sorte à ce que ce soit mille fois plus. Et nous avons tous le devoir, indépendamment de nos émotions, de faire en sorte que ce conflit qui a une existence propre quand les guerres naissent, elles ont une vie propre. Jamais une guerre n'est née qu'elle n'ait échappé à son père ou à sa mère, jamais. Ce n'est arrivé qu'une guerre reste bien tranquille, en laisse. Pendant que la première guerre mondiale, on pensait qu'elles seraient finies pour Noël mille-neuf-cent-quatorze ou Noël mille-neuf-cent-quinze au pire, alors qu'elles durent encore aujourd'hui par ses conséquences et les conséquences de la première guerre mondiale sont sous nos yeux aujourd'hui, puisque c'est la distribution des frontières en Palestine mandataire qui a créé cette situation et c'est la non application de la déclaration Balfour qui a aussi créé cette situation Puisque Util naquit, Util était né en mille-neuf-cent-dix-sept, un État israélien aurait sans doute moins polarisé, disons les populations sur place. Mais tirons les leçons d'une guerre dont elle nous a échappé alors que beaucoup de gens et de grands penseurs, même Henry Bergson versaient dans l'idée que cette guerre aurait des vertus. Et même Apollinaire disait oui après tout, il y a de la fraternité et de la beauté dans la guerre avant d'être blessé gravement, tireront les leçons d'une guerre dont on a cru qu'on pourrait la contrôler et qui nous a contrôlé nous et qui contrôle encore la géopolitique mondiale plus de cent ans après. La première guerre mondiale aujourd'hui préside par ses conséquences aux destinées humaines. Jamais nous n'avons été aussi proches d'une troisième guerre mondiale qu'aujourd'hui. Et quelles que soient nos émotions, quelles que soient nos revendications, nous devons avant toute chose faire en sorte qu'une guerre qui aujourd'hui brûle à soixante morts par heure ne brûle pas à soixante mille.
Saved - February 18, 2024 at 9:26 PM

@NewFounding - New Founding

> The Censorship Industrial Complex > “Elections” as critical infrastructure > Those who join The Blob vs who fight > The winning condition for the censorship empire > @elonmusk vs the censors—can he win? @MikeBenzCyber joins us for one of our most important episodes yet. https://t.co/45gkn3h1wh

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores the history and development of internet censorship, highlighting how the internet initially promoted free speech but eventually became a tool for controlling information. The speaker discusses the involvement of government agencies, NGOs, and private companies in shaping online discourse, as well as the use of cutouts to carry out indirect actions. Recent developments, such as Elon Musk's involvement in Twitter and the growing resistance against censorship, are also mentioned. The speaker suggests that the battle over internet censorship will continue, emphasizing the organized effort to challenge it. Additionally, the video delves into the intersection of censorship technology and institutional infrastructure, particularly in relation to election rigging. The role of AI and machine learning in censoring and manipulating information is highlighted, along with the involvement of tech companies and government agencies. The need for legal and regulatory actions, as well as institutional alternatives, to combat censorship is emphasized. Concerns are expressed about the potential impact of encirclement strategies on free speech platforms. The video concludes by emphasizing the importance of fighting against censorship and the various paths to victory in this ongoing battle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You get groomed in this business. You know, you go to a high end white shoe university, then you are either you take the tech path through Google or you take the, you know, you take the political path through the hill or you take the human rights path through a through a UN job or through a gongo, you know, government operated NGO. And then you get credentials through the think tanks. You get your fellowships at Carnegie or Atlantic Council or or Brookings. And then by that point, the woman you marry is probably you know, a blob creature. The people you are you're hanging out with on weekends are blob creatures. Everything your news sources are all blob publications. And nary a hit piece will ever be written about you in the New York Times and the Washington Post. Every golden turd you lay on the sidewalk will be deified as being abstract art instead of an actual piece of crap. I can see why there is so little dissent within the blob. Speaker 1: Jumping right into it, like, a I didn't realize it was this bad, but you're kind of the expert on this. So why don't you talk us through the history of censorship of the his censorship industrial complex and how it works? Speaker 0: Yeah. So, you know, the easiest way to sorta understand the history of of censorship on the Internet is to first understand the history of freedom on the Internet. A lot of people, look at censorship as one of the reasons it's such a blasphemous anti American thing isn't just because of the First Amendment, but because the Internet itself was the beacon of American outsourcing of free speech values for 25 years. Internet free speech had a lot of money and power pumped behind it for the 25 years before Internet censorship came around. So, you know, the Internet started as this military project by DARPA, basically to help manage social science research and counterinsurgency to help run the American empire overseas during the Vietnam era, and, a way of digitizing that. And then when the Cold War ended, 1991, it was privatized through the World Wide Web. The DARPA handed the Internet over to the National Science Foundation, who then basically, you know, spread this infrastructure across the universities, and then it was opened up to the Private Sector. But the private sector was given sort of a steroidal injection, you know, Super Mario Brothers mushroom boost from the National Security State in the form of the State Department, the Defense Department, the CIA, and the NSA, all juicing the, Internet commerce and Internet tracking through basically government so I'll give you an example. We had something called Voice of America in 19 forties and fifties. Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia. There were 100 of these CIA proprietary media stations that the national security state would pipe in after World War 2 ended for soft power influence over countries around the world, as radio was becoming a saturating medium of news. And so this helped get foreign populations around the world hooked on American news, American interests. We could seed stories there. True or false? You know, American cultural icons. We could we could dominate culture, politics, economic policy, foreign policy, by basically getting a whole population to read our propaganda. There was a catch up period in radio and in TV, during the 20th century, and when the Internet came out, it was one of these new Voice of America type things. This is one of the reasons that the Pentagon spent 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars developing Internet free speech technology, VPNs, virtual private networks to hide your IP address. Tor, the dark net to be able to, you know, buy and sell goods, or trade, or do sort of commerce in the in the dark and avoiding government monitoring of what you're doing, end to end encrypted chats. All these things came out of the out of Pentagon funds to help the state department and the CIA, back dissident groups in foreign countries whose governments we were trying to overthrow. So free speech was a meme, free speech online was a meme that was championed by our diplomacy, defense, intelligence nexus, state department, defense department, CIA, NSA. Mhmm. In order to maintain and advance the American empire from 1991 until 2016. Really, it's 2014. We can get into get into the weeds of of how this all started, I guess, now. But Speaker 2: so So so real quick, you're saying that things like VPNs and Tor that we tend to think of as, you know, hiding from the government or or anti government were actually developed by agents or by okay. Speaker 1: To promote in other places open communications, ability to disseminate democracy and democratic Right. And all this stuff. Yeah. Speaker 0: Right. Now, you know, there are terms like Open Society, for example, that George Soros and Open Society Foundation. Now, these aren't just terms from influential, eccentric billionaires. These were ideologies embraced at the highest levels of the Federal Government and of our National Security State because an open society, it's media being open, it's cultural influences being open, it's markets being open, allows the United States, and I'm not even knocking this necessarily. Mhmm. I need to be, I like to be sort of as careful as I can in this because I'm not sure that I had a problem with this until it all came home. But the fact is, is open societies are easy to pry open, closed ones are not. This is why the State Department is so quick to yell shrill insults about authoritarian societies when they box out Google or when they box out, Voice of America or some state department funded NGO. And we call it authoritarian, but if it were to if any other country were to do that here, they would be shipped out of the country on a cart so fast you couldn't blink first. I mean, we shut down the Internet, you know, on this Russiagate craziness, around just Russia today having a Twitter account. And, and Sputnik, you know, having viral articles on Facebook. I mean, that was enough. It wasn't even NGOs filled with tens of 1,000,000 of dollars of, you know, Russian Federation money. So but but that's our game that we play abroad. And so, you know, the Internet censorship story is sort of the flip side of that. It's it's what happens when rigging democratic outcomes through freedom goes wrong. The problem is is after 25 years of internet maturity, with social media, essentially allowing over time, ordinary civilians and citizen journalists, and post accounts, to grow in size unfettered over time, and the market essentially validating them over mainstream news, means that the traditional cutouts that the National Security State, the Federal Government, foreign policy establishment all have to be able to influence society, are actually pale in comparison. And you start having this weird situation as 4 star General John Allen said at a German Marshall Fund Conference in 2019, what happens when the New York Times is reduced to a medium sized Facebook page? I mean, he was arguing that the rules based international order will fall apart if, you know, Ricky Vaughn is able to have a larger Twitter account than, than the New York Times. In a sense, they're not totally wrong, but, you know, their solution is to destroy, every fiber of the social contract that we've had in this country for several centuries. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Yeah. That's fascinating how that flip happens. And I wanna dig into it a little bit. You've talked about how you've talked about this sleight of hand is it's how I remember it. Sleight of hand around, critical infrastructure. Can you talk a little bit about that and how it how that all develops? Speaker 0: Oh, it's so dirty. So so this has to do with the federal government's entry into the censorship industry business. So after the 2016 election, you know, it's really basically, there was a Philippines election in 2016 that went wrong for the CIA, Brexit went wrong, and the Trump election went wrong, all in the same year. And all of the amazing firepower behind Internet freedom coming from the Arab Spring, when all of the Obama administration's adversaries in Middle East, North Africa all were toppled by Facebook and Twitter revolutions. When it went the opposite way through this Internet freedom thing, the foreign policy establishments spook set, essentially out of the State Department, now the intelligence agencies, went on this world tour, around setting up infrastructure to stop so called, you know, disinformation, Russian disinformation, was the initial predicate because that's how you crack open intelligence agency powers. You need some sort of foreign predicate, a foreign national security threat. Then you set up the infrastructure and then you switch it, you know, once it's there, you can just, you know, you've developed the Death Star weapon, now you can just fire it at any plant, doesn't matter what the initial premise was. So there was a DHS sub agency called CISA, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. And this thing was initially set up during the height of Russiagate in November 2018 to be able to stop Russian hacking. You know, at the time, there were these allegations that Russia had hacked the DNC servers. It wasn't Seth Rich. It wasn't anything like that. It was the Russians, and they had this firm called CrowdStrike, which was supposedly validating that. Although CrowdStrike ended up walking it back a year later, amazingly. But by that point, the agency was already set up. And at the time, cybersecurity was the only offensive, term for the Federal Government to be able to to act in in in cyber, you know, cyber takedown activity. So cyber security at that time in 2018 meant things like malware, phishing, you know, various forms of hacking attacks. Yeah. But what happened was, after Russiagate fell apart in the summer of 2019, they were already teaming up to stop rushing disinformation because of basically a a CIA op, starting in January 2017 to paint the social media as being inundated with Russian bots and trolls. All of this, again, turned out to be dog water. But what happened was, CISA, this DHS agency, set up all these relations with the with the social media companies, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, even even the minor ones like Twitch, Discord, all to have these government affairs folks and these content moderation teams work with CISA to stop, and to censor and to ban Russian narrative pro Russian narratives, anti NATO narratives, basically, right wing populist accounts, and a little bit of left wing populist accounts, like the Corbynites in in in the UK and some of the early Bernie Sanders, supporters before he, you know, turned to completely to the to the dark side, if you will. But but essentially what happened was, they did this multi front switcheroo. They said, okay, well, Russiagate fell apart, but really, Russian disinformation is pales in comparison to the threat of domestic disinformation at home. They went from a sort of national security predicate on the Russia side to a democracy predicate at home, and this was buoyed by nonstop media memery of the term democracy, democracy, democracy, and disinformation, disinformation, disinformation. They sort of blew up the gravity of this thing to where it sucked everything into it and it allowed it to be very easy for government agencies to say, oh, you know, we're we're advancing the principles that are so hot right now in the news. And then the other thing they did is they said cybersecurity, actually includes cyber disinformation and misinformation threats. And this is the real the real dirty dirty one because this allowed them to say that cybersecurity does doesn't just mean hacking, it also means misinformation about critical infrastructure. Because DHS has a license to take on threats to critical infrastructure. So they declared elections to be critical infrastructure, and they declared public health to be critical infrastructure. So by declaring elections to be critical infrastructure, if you as a civilian say that you think there's election fraud with mail in ballots. That was deemed to be delegitimization, which was, which was said to be a cyber attack on the critical infrastructure of elections because you are undermining the perceived legitimacy of of elections, and this is essentially an attack on democracy, and it's attack on on elections themselves. And so, literally, you know, DHS set up this cutout called the election integrity partnership, which got 22,000,000 tweets labeled as misinformation, and they were working in coordination with DHS. They were set up by DHS. So you have this situation where DHS basically banned 22 that's just on Twitter alone. They did this for 15 different platforms. That's 100 of millions of pieces of content at the height of a highly contested US election, completely banned. And now I let the accounts often get banned along with it. So you've rigged the entire information ecosystem by doing this switcheroo around cybersecurity. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's crazy. It's like they set up the both the the object, you know, essentially making somebody, like, you go to a power plant. You plant a bomb. You blow that up. You're doing the same thing if you say something about elections being the power plant and the bomb is just maybe you asking a question online. Speaker 0: And they knew this too. You know, one of the main guys behind this, a guy named Alex Stamos, who's the head of something called the Stanford Internet Observatory, which is basically a giant CIA cutout. I mean, the whole thing is mobbed up with spoofs like you like you wouldn't believe. And, you know, he's he's on tape talking about how, you know, at the time, all we really had was the word cybersecurity to do all this stuff. So we had to really jam it in there. But, you know, one day, these will probably, you know, formally be known as separate fields. You know, we just don't have the political cloud essentially to do it yet. So they they knew what they were doing. They knew what they were doing the whole time. As early as as 2017 when all this stuff was getting started, even before the infrastructure, the censorship infrastructure connecting the government to the private sector, to the civil society institutions, to NewsMe, and fact checking. Before that whole whole of society quadrant was set up, they knew what they were doing. I mean, these people are all on tape at at Atlantic Council Conferences, which is a which is a big NATO cutout. It's got 7 CIA directors on its board. It had a formal partnership with Burisma. It's it's a whole nasty gram of sort of Biden intelligence world intrigue. And, in February 2017, they were having these conferences talking about the need to establish a sort of Russia connection, that would eventually be used, you know, because the public wasn't ready. You boil the frog type stuff. Also, State Department people going to Europe and pressuring them to adopt, censorship regulations like NESTIG in Germany in August 2017, knowing that America couldn't do that yet. You know these diplomats saying this openly in these in these public conferences that that if if Europe leads, America will follow through norms and standards, the laws that are adopted in Europe, and also these European laws will compel these these norms and standards and practices on the censorship side that will have to be glommed on over to the US for market continuity. Things like AI censorship. It's the things that were real game changers. Because before 2016, you couldn't even censor the Internet at the scale you do now because everything was human moderated other than child porn and spam. But there was no speech related, AI pre censorship. But now everything, every word you speak. If this goes up on YouTube, every single word we're saying right now is going into is going into thousands of trust and safety layers, parsing every word, parsing the proximity of words to one another to scan for terms and phrases that are deemed to be borderline content or that are basically proxies for, you know, populist political support. Speaker 1: Yeah. So was the singular event that triggers this into overdrive the 26th or sorry, the 2020 election? Or, you mentioned 2014 earlier. What what dates do you see as critical kind of trigger thing? Speaker 0: I would say, you know, it became a military thing in 2014. And what happened in 2016 was a follow on on the was a follow on of of the of the military lead from 2014. So, basically, in 2014, you had the the great failure of the Obama administration in Ukraine. You know, there was, there was this long range plan from the state department around bringing Ukraine into the NATO Euro Atlantic axis. There was a more or less unimpeded string of w's from the foreign policy establishment from 1991 to 2014, which came to a screeching halt when there was a counter coup from the Russian side to the coup from from the US, UK side. You know, for folks who aren't familiar, you know, you had this democratically elected president of Ukraine, Yanukovych, who, you know, the state department sort of painted as this Russian agent Putin pawn, which is, I mean, frankly, that's nonsense. The Yanukovych was signing oil and gas deals with with US energy companies. Shell, Halliburton, Chevron, Exxon, all these had multibillion dollar deals with the Ukrainian government there. But, basically, NATO tried to twist their arm. The IMF tried to twist their arm. They went with the Russian trade deal. Victoria Nuland, Jeff Pyatt swoop in. They, you know, summoned the the right sector. We pumped $5,000,000,000 of civil society cash into these rent riot mobs. They overthrow Yanukovych, install Yats in York. I mean, literally install, no election. Just we just pick their president. And then, you know, a funny thing happened on the way to a color revolution. The Luhansk and Donetsk broke off, declared themselves independent, not subject to the new Kyiv government. And Crimea not only broke off, but then it independently voted to join the Russian Federation. And this was something that neither NATO nor the State Department was prepared for for there to be a military backstop by Russia of a of basically splitting in half the crown jewel country of a multi decade NATO plan. And when when this happened, there was a panic that set in that that the NATO had lost its soft power projection magic that had existed basically from 1947 onward, which is to say that these people in Eastern Ukraine voluntarily broke off from from NATO because of their own internal beliefs, their own media influences. That is there was $5,000,000,000 of National Endowment For Democracy, USAID, state department, NGO's form money, pumped into Ukraine to control its media, to control its hearts and minds, but none of it worked. None of it worked in Eastern Ukraine, at least. Now a lot of that is because of the Russian ethnic, you know, disposition, over there. But the fact is is this set in motion a doctrine. At the time it was called the Gerasimov doctrine, you can sort of get into some of the technical details if you want, but it eventually came to be called hybrid warfare, which is this idea that NATO needs to start looking at war less as about conventional weapons and more about control over people's minds. And they this eventually got codified in this in this term that would be bandied about, called from tanks to tweets, which was this doctrine that, Jens Stoltenberg did, like, a dozen speeches on. It was in the NATO 2030 blueprint. They paraded around this whole thing that NATO has to focus less on tanks. Now again, this is all before 2022. This is from 2014 until you know, this was the critical period, by the way, where censorship was set up. I mean, the what happened after 2022 is an afterthought compared to in fact, 2022 was sort of the moment things turned in the other direction, from the house slipping, from Elon Musk taking over Twitter, from a bunch of lawsuits that we might get to. But, by that point, the this military focus on dominating hearts and minds had already had 1,000,000,000 of dollars pumped into it. It's, I mean, it's hilarious how this thing got promoted. It's almost like how, you know, if if you're a zoologist and you wanna get government grant money to study squirrels, you know, you you just put a line in there about how, you know, climate change is like a sub subject of study for your squirrel mating habits. And you'll get you'll get approved because you said the magic word climate change. Well, the same thing started to happen all across the federal government with hybrid warfare. Whether you were in psychology or sociology or computer science, whether you were at RAND Corporation, or whether you were a DARPA researcher, or whether, you know, you were trying to get matching funds as a as a corporation for corporate social responsibility. If you just put in that term hybrid warfare, it got to the point where you had these NATO conferences where people would apologize for using the term because it was so played out. But it had a very deadly double meaning, which was that you no longer had this presupposition of a civilian run media. You you had military top down control, military top down influence, doctrinally. I mean, you had as a first principle this idea that there was now a military need to control the media. And this started between 2014 2016 in Central and Eastern Europe. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, the whole Baltics, Ukraine, all the way up through Germany. A massive investment in these things called centers of excellence, NATO centers of excellence, STRATCOM, strategic communications, all to build psychological resilience. And this basically involved just censoring the ever loving crap out of anyone who, who was spewing anti NATO talking points, or most nefariously, who was supporting the political candidates in those countries who were deemed to be populist, were not down with foreign policy establishment. The classic example of this is Germany. After the migrant crisis, 2013, 2015, in Germany, there was a huge explosion of popularity of a political party called the Alternative fur Deutschland or AFD. Now AFD was this sort of, you know, workers, you know, working class, you know, sort of lower middle class, you know, very similar to sort of MAGA, you know, types in the US or Brexiteers in the UK, similar in a lot of ways. And they were basically running as a platform on cheap energy through through Russian gas pipelines. At the time, Nord Stream 2 was this big matching natural gas pipeline that was going to double the natural gas supply from gas from Russia, deepen the relations between Germany and Russia. NATO was going the 100% opposite way. They had this whole grand Ukraine energy play prying off Russia, nuking Russia's gas exports down to 0. And so there was this whole proxy war playing out in Germany around, essentially, the CIA, the state department, the NGOs, everything they could to subvert AFD and all of its political proxies, all of its pro AFD media news stations, pro AFD social media accounts. I mean, you had US taxpayer funded NGOs having public conferences about how to stop domestic meddling in Germany's own elections. The people would have the temerity to influence their own elections. Yeah. This is what our own state department is saying. But, you know, this was when Brexit happened in 2016, it came to the it came to the UK, and when the Trump election happened in in the US, in short order, that was the final straw. NATO had had enough. The US State Department had enough. The CIA had enough. The UK foreign office had enough. Brussels had had enough. Enough of free speech, we need to shut this shut the Internet down, essentially. And so everything swung the opposite direction, and we're living in the aftermath of that. Speaker 1: It's an insane time. I mean, there's a an article we'll link it in the show. It's it's called what happened in 2012, and it tracks the kind of cataclysmic chain of events that that come about after, smartphone adoption goes through the roof in 2012. So it goes from, like, 2010, it's like a smartphone adoption. It's like, I don't know, 20% of the population, maybe 8% of population. 2012, it reaches something like 80% of population. And then you have Brexit. You have, Ukraine issues. You have 2016 election. It seems like it's a time where the the powers that be, NATO and others, are having to reckon with the onslaught of these new technologies and the the consequences that you said earlier. There's a panic. They don't know what the unintended effects of these of these things are gonna be. Speaker 2: And there was a real sense the time, like, post 26, 16 on the especially on the left side of saying, we need to do whatever it takes to prevent these types of things from happening again. Like, whatever needs to happen, that's the work that we need to put in over the next few years. And they did, obviously, coming up to 2020. But what what's happened, you know, with the with suppression of, all the information around the election? But that seems to me like kind of the peak. What's happened in the intervening years since that time? Speaker 0: Well, the infrastructure was all set up. Do do you mean between 2014 and 2022? Speaker 2: Between 2020 and present day. Speaker 0: Oh, well, you know, there was a wave because right now, there's really the first successful counter offensive going on. I would say that, I mean, look, they're coming back. This is going to be a battle that will last well beyond the rest of our lives. There's, It's never over, and in certain respects, it's still getting worse. But there have been many things that have happened in the past 12 months. I would say the high watermark to date of the censorship industry is, like, March, April 2022. From between 2020 and spring of 2022, it was the codification and the complete normalization of all the censorship infrastructure that was set up between 2018 and 2020. So a great example of this is is CISA, this DHS censorship agency we were talking about. They ran the censorship of the 2020 election out of a subunit called the countering foreign influence task force. Now, the countering foreign influence task force was specifically, explicitly directed around censoring US citizen lawful opinions about the 2020 election. They targeted everyone from James O'Keefe to Mark Levin to Don Junior, to freaking Cat Turd. They had Cat Turd on a list, and and it was called the countering foreign influence task force. Now they knew at the time this was dirty business and and they they didn't have the predicate to do it. They actually talked about setting up this cutout EIP because they, quote, lacked the funding and the legal authorities to to do it directly out of DHS's Countering Foreign Influence Task Force. They knew they didn't have the legal authority. Now the 1st week Biden takes office, Biden takes office on January 20, 2016 or 2020. The 1st week he changed DHS changes the name of that office from the office of countering foreign influence, the from the countering foreign influence task force to the office of mis, Dis, and Malinformation. So they retroactively paper over the fact that they didn't have a predicate to do this domestically. Even though in October 2020, 1 month before the 2020 election, at their own disinformation conference, they talked about how their focus was should be 80% domestic, 20% foreign. They said, right now we're focused on 80% foreign, 20% domestic, We need to flip that because the fire is coming from inside the house. 80% domestic. 80% domestic, and yet they were still calling it the the far countering foreign influence task force. But 1 month after 1 week after Biden takes office, they they correct that. They paper it over. So now, as the office of misdis and malinformation, generally, all things wrong or perceived to be wrong or just troublesome on the Internet are now at the jurisdiction of this ministry of truth within, you know, the ministry we set up to stop another 911. And so, you know, that's that that happened in 2020. You had a lot of political predicate to stop extremism between 20, you know, between January 2021 and 2022 because of the January 6th stuff. So you had this whole sort of normalization of censorship of domestic voices, from the January 6th stuff. And then as that started to run out of steam a little bit, and as more things came to light about what was actually going on and how the sausage was being made, you had this turning of the tide. You know, you had in April 2022, you had the disinformation governance board attempt to be set up within DHS. The fact that that was killed within a week because these sort of sleeping giant of Republican neurosis was somehow, you know, awakened. I mean, it's kinda hilarious if you think about it because the ministry of truth was already it was set up in November 2018. The the the disinformation governance board wasn't a ministry of truth. In a sense, the opponents of Jim Jordan and Chuck Grassley were sort of correct there. It was just this dull, boring bureaucratic layer to manage the sprawling ministry of truth that had already been set up, but because it wasn't given a boring name like cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency, because they were dumb enough to call it a name vaguely echoing what it actually does, suddenly, everyone was aware. Oh my god. There's a government role in censorship. Now I've been screaming my plastered face off about this for 5 years, and somehow it took an event like that to catalyze, you know, government awareness of of Internet censorship. But you had that, and then in short succession, Elon Musk, you know, does x macking up, you know, $44,000,000,000 falls out of the sky to to free the the largest social media platform. You have the the the Twitter files, exposes. You have multiple lawsuits from the, State Attorney General's office in Missouri and Louisiana against the Biden administration, specifically on First Amendment grounds on censorship. You have this the America First, legal federal class action case on free speech. You have the Republicans winning the house in November 2022, which opens the floodgates 8 different congressional committees. House Judiciary, House Oversight, Weaponization, House Homeland Security Committee, Science, Space and Technology, House Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce, and and Senate Senate, Homeland Security. All of these have independently done their own investigations, pull people in for transcribed interviews, subpoenas, basically sunlight disinfecting many of these institutions that had operated, you know, not exaggerating, for 6 or 7 years with 0, 0 friction to their operations in terms of transparency. While these people were were all, you know, parading in the media about the need for platform transparency. While themselves, they were shielding everything. Yep. They were having these direct cahoots, co censorship coordination with the federal government, and then arguing that they shouldn't have to turn those over in FOIA requests or even in subpoenas. So, you know, these are people who operate in a cloak and dagger fashion. They're they're shrouded by Orwellian double speak words and that prevent the public from really piercing what they actually do. But the good thing is is now there is a really organized counter offensive to pry that open. The only question is is, you know, how much will they raise the stakes to subvert that? What they're doing with the justice department right now with these indictments and, you know, is has upped the level in a way that I don't think people anticipated a couple years ago. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's I mean, there's so much there. Part of it, that's something that that strikes me as you've been saying it is there's a there's a, department of you know, the state department, and then there's a subcommittee, and that has its own subcommittee or its own subsection or subsection. And then you have this sort of Russian nesting doll situation where, departments within departments within departments are the ones driving monstrous policy that, you know, affect just everybody's lives. Talk a little bit about that mechanism. Like, how how does that how does that work? Why why is that mentality there of, like, let's start another subcommittee and subcommittee and subcommittee. Is it is is part of the goal there to cloak it, to to hide it? Speaker 0: So if if we're talking about the structure of institutional consensus building, You know, there's a concept I come back to time and again called the the blob. This is a a term from Ben Rhodes, who is Obama's deputy national security advisor, and he used this to describe the foreign policy establishment. You know, this is this diplomacy, defense, intelligence, nexus, State Department, Pentagon, CIA, plus the, you know, all the NGOs and all their little funded cutouts and and and and shell, entities, essentially. Now this this apparatus, the blob, was was set up essentially in 1947, 1948, very early on as a, as a sort of conjoining of of the State Department, the the Pentagon, and the CIA to be able to coordinate our management of the American empire. So the American empire is much bigger than the American homeland. You know, there's there's only 300,000,000 people here. The the the amount of citizens around the world who are subject, essentially, to the American empire even even during World War 2, our our our empire know, we became a global empire in 18/98. The Philippines and the Spanish American War and Cuba and Latin America was basically under our fold since the early 1800 with, the Monroe doctrine in 18/23, and and then when the when the Marshall Plan kicked off in, in in the 19 1948, basically Europe became part of the American empire. And so we we needed this coordinating apparatus within the federal government to manage the different levers of soft power control abroad. So, I like to think of them as being conjoined, and these people all rotate jobs. If you've got a job in an intelligence agency or in a feeder to it, in an NGO feeder to intelligence agency, you're eligible for a job at the State Department or Pentagon's, you know, civil affairs type stuff, immediately. It's it's the same skill set, it's just a slightly different focus. So there is a consensus building architecture for getting Defense, diplomacy and intelligence all aligned. And that also includes their stakeholders in private industry, Chamber of Commerce, the energy sector, the military contractors, the the banking and finance, the Goldman Sachs type and and BlackRock type type investors. Those are all what I call the donors and drafters off of the National Security State. So a great example of this is is George Soros. So you know Soros made his money basically being a partner of the State Department as we were prying open Central and Eastern Europe during the Cold War in the 19 eighties, his Open Society Foundations were essentially the civil society arm of NATO and the state department and the UK foreign office to be able to get tens of thousands of people in a region on payroll, get these rental riots with student groups and and young people who would provide the muscle to be able to, you know, bum rush a parliament building to kick a president out, or to be able to shut down government buildings if an authoritarian, wasn't, you know, doing a trade deal that that the US government wanted. And so, but Soros was speculating. At the same time, he was running a New York hedge fund that speculated on the currencies of Central and Eastern European governments. So it's basically an insider trading operation where you have this big mega banker who's got an inside knowledge and has helped instrumentalizing the regime change of a foreign country while betting on that country's currency knowing the direction it will go 10 months before the market does. Now you see the same phenomenon happen everywhere. In the natural gas, market, you know, the, Ukraine sits on on Europe's 2nd largest shale reserves, totally untapped. If you if you know that that Eastern Ukraine is going to basically free up that, and if you know that Ukraine's natural gas mega giant, Naftogas, which is the public company that's the dominating lion's share of the entire country's revenue. If you know that publicly held company is about to be privatized at gunpoint by the Pentagon and spun off to all these stakeholders, they're going to have their investments protected by the CIA, the state department, the defense department, NATO, Mi 6, the UK foreign office, and, you know, in in a in a pride open German government. If you know those are about to be brand new windfall investments protected at gunpoint by 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of taxpayer revenue, that's an easy investment. And that's why Chevron, and Shell, and Halliburton, and all of the Cheney and Bush Companies and all of the the the the London ones like Shell, they all rushed in with $10,000,000,000 investments with the Ukrainian government once it looked like the national security state was going to break the wind for them. So they so these these entities also contribute to the regime change operations. You know, the Chamber of Commerce will pour in money through this CIA cutout, you know, called the the Center For International Private Enterprise, run out of the National Endowment For Democracy. You know, you'll have these, we've been doing this by the way since the 1800s in a certain respect. Coca Cola, you know, was was helping, you know, you had these, you had these, you know and United Fruit was doing this too in the 1800. Yeah. Where you have these sort of corporate donors to a national security state operation, but there's a mutual back scratching. They the the the corporate side will provide some assistance funding and provide some some, you know, some capital. It's almost like you're bringing in an investment with it. You have an anchor investor in the form of the US government, but then you bring in all these sort of follow on investors, and what they get in return is a captive market because now everybody in that country is eating McDonald's. I mean, this is a funny thing about McDonald's and there's a there's a really funny ad that everybody who's watching this should look up, the Gorbachev Pizza Hut ad in the early nineties. The moment Russia fell into the US empire after the after the cold war ended, And the State Department and the CIA all descended on Russia. We did shock therapy. We privatized $2,000,000,000,000 in assets and went straight to the Harvard Endowment and to the to the Wall Street and London investors. And like the most iconic scene from that was is this ad that Gorbachev himself shot for Pizza Hut with, you know, about how now Pizza Hut had finally come to, you know, 200,000,000 Russians, you know, but think about that as a as a equity stakeholder in Pizza Hut. You now have, at the barrel of a NATO gun, 200,000,000 new customers, And especially for high margin businesses in the energy sphere. So you have this consensus building, to bring this back, you have this consensus building process, and this is what they think democracy is. They we think of democracy as you and I voting. For them, it's a cumbersome enough process to get all the institutions into a democratic alignment. How do you get the energy companies? How do you get the military contractors? How do you get the Chamber of Commerce countries companies? How do you get the State Department careers? How do you get the CIA operations division? How do you get the Pentagon and the National Security? How do you get them all to vote on what you're doing in a region? What are you gonna do with Belarus? What do you how are you gonna handle Ukraine? What are you gonna do in the Baltics? To bring these people into alignment requires a a consensus building process both within the government agencies and then outside them through these white shoe think tanks, like Brookings or the Atlanta Council or CSIS. Now these double as being places where people are put on payroll. These people get very cushy signicures. I'm a resident fellow at the at the Scowcroft Center of the Atlantic Council, and you just collect your paycheck to basically consensus build with your peers. You're basically paid to propagandize the NATO talking points to your peers so that they are brought into alignment. It's almost like the same way, you know, you you come to be a a paid, you know, political shill, to do your little Instagram posts promoting political candidate du jour. These soft power NGOs, which are all funded by the federal government, do the same thing with recruiting essentially an institutional army to to make that happen. Speaker 2: Can you talk more about so you mentioned cutouts before. I think a lot of people are not familiar with that term, but you talk about what are cutouts and how are those formed? Speaker 0: Yeah. Cutout is when the government wants to do something, but for either legal or logistical reasons, it can't. And so it has to operate through a puppeteered non governmental organization. Now these can take the form of university centers, these can take the form of of nongovernmental organizations, you know, or, you know, what are sometimes called, Gongos instead of NGOs, government operated nongovernmental organizations. They can also take the form of private firms. This is something that the State Department and the CIA have been doing, again, since the since the 19 forties. Part of this is because you need to move money through things in order to set these set these up. And so, there's a money laundering process for this, essentially. I I posted a video on this the other day of, I think a CBS special from the early 19 sixties, showing how sophisticated the shell game already was by the 19 sixties of the CIA and the state department, when they want to when they want to pump up, say, you know, a political group in Nicaragua or Belize, you know, first, the, you know, the the CIA or the state department money goes into an offshore bank in the Cayman Islands of Panama. And then from there, it goes into a nonprofit foundation from some affiliated, you know, from some friendly, but non affiliated group. These are where your Souro's or your Omidyar's or your Craig Newmark's. This is where you're sort of, you know, oligarchic business owner or philanthropists who work arm in arm with the National Security State in this sort of donor and drafter class come from. And then from there, it will go to the NGO of choice. And so, this is something we've had, again, there's nothing new about this. It's it's now in 80 years, we've had this highly sophisticated process for creep for pumping up, they call it capacity building. Pumping up the capacity of an organization that can do what you are not allowed, or you don't or would be logistically inappropriate to do. So, you know, when we wanna overthrow when the CIA wants to topple a foreign government, you know, we don't march in there with a bunch of w two tax forms and badges who say, hi. My name is Mike Benz. I don't clip that. But you're hi. My you know, my my name is, you know, Sanjay. I I work for the Central Intelligence Agency. How are you? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: There's everything in this world operates through and by the way, even at the State Department level, we this this is why we operate through NGOs and university centers and sort of pop up private sector firms. Because it's a diplomatic incident when you are supporting or or interfacing with opposition groups within a country who are hostile to that country's government. I mean, this would I mean, you can imagine if the if the Russian Federation, you know, was literally calling itself the Russian Federation, you know, as it was, you know, working with Turning Point USA or something. Right? This would they wouldn't dare to do that. Now now look, they don't even do proxy stuff, even that's an invention of our foreign policy blob to try to create a counterintelligence predicate to censor and abuse us. But the fact is is we do that left, right, and center on I don't think you could spin the globe and find a country where I can't point you to where we do these operations internationally, but we have to do it through cutouts. Because even if you were to do it through overt diplomacy, and we do a lot of this actually through overt diplomacy through our democracy promotion programs, but it's still unsightly. And so most of the swarm that surrounds sound where it looks like there's a consensus in the country. Because 200 different media outlets are all echoing the same talking points about, oh, there's authoritarian abuse by this by this government. Or, you know, in Ukraine, we had something called the Ukraine Crisis Media Center, where it was 56 different US State Department funded NGOs, all working in totally mockingbird fashion to amplify the exact same, you know, sort of talking points around around governance, around energy policy, around military policy. But that was I mean, that's that's basically just the State Department simultaneously playing 56 different string instruments at once. So you need cutouts to operate in this business, that's why there's so many of them. Speaker 1: I was listening to the, Rogan Musk, interview that came out 2 days ago, and Musk talks about how Twitter it wasn't just being used, you know. They didn't just have a couple of FBI agents there, you know, giving them some pointers on what to what to censor, which knobs to turn. He said there was it was functionally a branch of the government. That's how bad it was. It said as a cutout in the beginning. Speaker 2: Still is among other companies. Yeah. Speaker 1: Among yeah. It said, like, Facebook and all the other ones that still are. It's only his own coming in and saying, nope. You're not a cutout anymore. This is this is not my cutout. This Speaker 2: is mine. Speaker 1: Change the landscape. So on that on that on the Musk and and x, front, do you think he's do you think his buying Twitter and pumping the brakes and all that is having some meaningful actual change and effect on on the censorship industrial complex. We know Speaker 0: it is. We know it is because, you know, don't don't take it from me. Take it from them. I I can't I've I've lost track of the, you know, the the wailing and lamentations, that have that have come out, not just in headlines, but in long form panel discussions and podcasts. These people in their own internal conversations are apoplectic about it. You saw this when when when Elon got rid of Aaron Rogers and the election integrity election integrity election censorship team, which was which itself was basically a CIA cutout ring. Aaron Rodricks himself came out of this, National Endowment for Democracy incubator. The National Endowment for Democracy is the CIA's premier cutout in the democracy promotion place. Literally, its founder said that they do overtly what the CIA used to do covertly. That's a direct quote from the from the National Endowment for Democracy's founder. And so Aaron Rodgers came straight from there. He was recruiting these censorship positions, directly from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which was run for the past 7 years by Bill Burns, Biden's current director of the Central Intelligence Agency. So Biden's CIA NGO of choice, is, like, where this guy was recruiting from. This guy was openly backing CISA's intelligence apparatus on it on his own in his own tweets. He was he was calling Musk himself an effing dipshit on his own Twitter profile. He is promoting blue sky and mastodon in his own Twitter bio. I mean, the guy was a was a was a was a total rogue agent, the head of but, you know, listen. Again, you have to understand is, like, when when the censorship technology was created at the a at the AI level, and the center censorship infrastructure was installed at the institutional level, these things both coincided in 2018. These people thought that they had found El Dorado. They thought they had found, you know, the land of gold to be able to rig every election on the planet. It took, like, 2 years for 85 different countries all be wrapped into the National Endowment for Democracies counter disinformation program. Eighty 5 different countries in 2 just 2 years between 2016, 2018, all being targeted by this by the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency's top cutout for working with YouTube, working with Facebook, working with Twitter 1 point o, to be able to rig elections. I mean, again, spin the globe. This is like Tanzania, Madagascar, I mean, the most remote regions. I didn't see Antarctica on the list, but it's only a matter of time. And every single one of these, you know, you had the election integrity team, and you can predict it. I mean, you could write an elementary script to be able to say to be able to predict exactly who they're going to rig in the election. It's whatever populous political group is, is is opposed to the US foreign policy blob. And they did this they did this everywhere. And they thought this was, you know, it's it's hard enough. In the 20th century, we focused on on saturation rather than censorship. Now there was censorship that was done when the CIA or the state department would have a relationship with the editorial desk of, like, Le Monde in France or, you know, the Frankfurt algemeiner in Germany. Like, we did have intelligence relations with large distribution news outlets to be able to kill stories. But most of it was about saturating. It was about churning up the knob of US government propaganda. Because we didn't have the capacity at the time to reach into the throat of 7,000,000,000 citizens and just turn their volume down to 0, you know, like freaking Ursula from Little Mermaid, you know, just stealing your voice if you express, you know, support for an, a candidate who the CIA didn't want to win. Now, again, these people have a license to do this under NSC 10 2 and 10 dash 2 and under the National Security Act of 1947. We have a license to rig elections. It's their it's their civic duty, you know, it's it's what they were put on this on this on this earth to do is to rig foreign elections. And when when the censorship technology through AI, through word embeddings, all you need to do is just, what's the name of the group you're trying to kill politically? What are their memes? What are their slogans? What are their rallying calls? You know, what are you just do you create this linguistic taxonomy of what the people in that region. That's why we get all these people, on payroll to map, you know, what they're saying. You know, we get the foreign language. What are they saying in Swahili to support their candidates in that region? What are they saying in Portuguese to this? So we bring in these, you know, these university centers to map the linguistic rhetoric, and then we plug those into AI algorithms. So you have this, you know, these sprawling reams of of keyword databases, and then you, you know, you you fine tune the sentiment analysis, you create this network map around who the key influences are. And so, with that in tow, with a captive team that's liaison liaising with you in the tech companies, you have the perfect formula to be able to if all you're doing is saturating your own message, it usually works. But sometimes ideology is persistent. Sometimes people just effing hate you. You screwed them over. You stole all their gold. You stole you stole all their oil. You stole their land. You stole you stole their sugar and agriculture crops. These people want you out. So sometimes no amount of propaganda will sway those hearts and minds. But, if these people can't even articulate their philosophy, then how are they going to scale it? All the it's it's it's it's not just, you know, it's it's clockwork orange. There's no ability to even mobilize, you know, all you can see is the government propaganda if you have the censorship weapon. So they roll this out everywhere, and and this relies again on these two things, the technological capacity to do it, through the machine learning AI, and the institutional pass through of of of cut out teams. Again, you don't need the whole organization to do this. Zuckerberg did not wanna do this. Dorsey did not wanna do this. And we can get into that, you know, Google did wanna do this. Okay? F f Google. But most of the tech companies didn't, and they had to have various carrots and sticks. The State Department protected them against Europe between 2018 and 2022. This is a big part of it. The state they, you know, they were relying on this same they were part of this donor drafter class who relied on the battering ram of the National Security State to protect their monopolies abroad. And that's a big leverage point to be able to force them to simply capacity build within their or new just simply set up a new content moderation team that focuses on counterintelligence. It'll interface, you know, with with Russian disinformation threats with the intelligence community, with the State Department. Or it'll focus on, you know, on content moderation or regulatory affairs. They have so many different ways to shoehorn getting 20 or 30 good people. Usually, who comes straight from the CIA or straight from the FBI or DHS or the State Department or the Pentagon, doing doing soft power influence jobs, you know, doing counterinsurgency work about molding the hearts and minds of Afghanis or Iraqis. And then they now they're suddenly at the Facebook equivalent, working with the state department or DHS on how to kill, you know, people who live in Idaho, their opinions on COVID or or Ukraine policy or energy policy or immigration policy or I mean, they they try to scale us to everything. But, again, we we know that Musk is making a difference because all of the worst people have said it. The Washington Post, the Stanford Internet Observatory, the the the Biden White House, you know, the the y'all Roth, there's they are in a regrouping period right now, and they're relying in part on this on the dividends from what they had set up earlier of government censorship. Right now, a lot of the action is in Europe, in the EU, in this new Digital Services Act, in this panoply of surround sound censorship laws that will compel censorship when pressure through through government insinuation, or through ad boycotts or through NGOs forms is insufficient, they can bring in a rule of law predicate, which is sort of the final, you know, Pogo thing to throw on the card, the final sort of Trump card that you can't fight against. That is the thing that is most daunting right now and that they have the most momentum on that's just really, really hard to fight. Speaker 1: Mike, I'm always astonished at just your your deep knowledge of the blob. You came from the state department. Right? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: So talk to me about, like, what, let's get into the the building blocks of of all these institutions, the cutouts, all these things. They're ultimately staffed, built by by individual people. What, causes somebody at the state department to take the path you take you you you take against censorship against all this? On the flip side, what's the kind of person that goes deep into all of these all of the blah? Talk to me about that difference. Speaker 0: Well, it's easier to talk about the second one because it's a very lonely road on the first one. Probably, you know, some combination of madness and not being hugged enough as I think I had a I had a teacher in high school, I think, who called it obstinate defiant syndrome. So, I think it's probably some combination of that and just, you know, it was a weird path. I was I was monitoring this stuff from very, very early on. You know, I I became, I had a chess background as a kid, and I lived through the period where Garry Kasparov lost to Deep Blue, and how the idea of chess computers totally shattered the conception of of the romantic period of chess as we knew it. And in late 2016, I became obsessive with the technological side of censorship because Google perspective, there there there's something called the called Jigsaw, which was set up essentially by by the it's basically the CIA wing of Google. And they, in late 2016, they rolled out this AI retail censorship product that worked just like chess computers. And you could go on to it, and you could plug in sentences, and it would spit out a toxicity score, and, you know, you could set confidence intervals for how, you know, in their own papers, they would describe how useful this tool would be to be able to set confidence levels to to automatically pre censor anything with a confidence level above a, you know, a 0.85. It's a 0 to 1 scale. It's the same way chess computers work, where the engine spits out a number and that tells you who's winning, you know, so negative 2.7 would say that the computer assesses black to be winning by 2.7 pawns, you know, it's basically. And you can do the same thing with, you know, whether or not a sentence or paragraph or a podcast violates a terms of service policy around mail in ballots or COVID skepticism or glorification of anti, you know, Ukraine forces, or you can plug and play to be able to create a deep blue to kick the even the most eloquent Gary Kasparov of of, like, political populism eloquence. It's and when I saw this in in in late 2016, I immediately had a a panic attack that, like, changed the rest of my life because it was so evident, having lived through the chess world, that, you know, everybody thought at the time they were like, Ben, so no. Let's let's just change the word. If if they say, you know, you can't say Trump, we'll just spell Trump with 2 r's and an f at the end, and, oh, they'll never catch us. And it's like, that's that's the same thing everyone was saying in the in the chess thing. Like, these you you are not going to be able to outrun an airplane. Like, this the money was rushing into it, you know, the Pentagon was rushing into it. The CIA was rushing into it. You know, Google was rushing into it. It was a gold mine, and you're sitting here, you know, as an as an edgy thinking that, you know, you're gonna be able to, like, you know, joke your way out. And so, anyway, so I became very obsessive on the technological front, and that led me sort of hand in glove to the institutional sort of so I I was very well aware of all this by the time I got to the state department. I was screaming about it, you know, well well before, you know, I was, you know, I had I had the privilege to be there. But what I'll what I'll say is, because I did not have a traditional path into the state department, I did not base my career and my principles, and my friendships, and my network on that path out of the State Department. Most people come they are of the blob by the time they get to a position like that within the within the blob. You get groomed in this business. You know, you get you go you work your way up. You know, you go to a a high end white shoe university, then you are either you take the tech path through Google, or you take the political path through the Hill, or you take the human rights path through a UN job or through a Gongo, you know, government operated NGO. And then you get credentialed through the think tanks. You get your fellowships at Carnegie or Atlanta Council or or Brookings. And then, you know, you have some sort of, you know, low level political job, or you become, you know, a career or foreign service, you know, you by that point, the woman you marry is probably, you know, a blob creature. You know, what you're the the people you are you're hanging out with on weekends are blob creatures. Everything your your news sources are all blob publications, and the money just first of all, it's it's glitzier than everything else on the other side. The cocktail party invitations, everything, you know, you are nary a hit piece will ever be written about you in the New York Times or the Washington Post. You know, every golden turd you lay on the sidewalk will be deified as being, you know, abstract art instead of an actual piece of crap. Like, you it's it's it it it it's like what I imagine a manic high is, like, extended over over decades. Because you're you think you're doing the Lord's work because everyone's telling you you are. And you think, you're being told it's patriotic because you are advancing the United States Federal Government's, you know, diplomacy apparatus or our national security or the CIA is our front first line of defense. I mean, this is what they say. It should be the last line, frankly, but they call it the first line. So some combination of money, social network, Clockwork Orange, you know, ideological saturation, and the fear of losing it all. I mean, is I can see why there is so little dissent within the blob. And, you know, part of this is, it was the great struggle of the Trump administration around staffing. But part of this is also that for there to really be an alternative, there needs to be an institutional alternative. There needs to be some place you can go after the State Department if you go against an Atlantic Council consensus from your desk there. There needs to, you know, there needs to be a robust civil society sector within, you know, populist movements or, or independent movements. There needs to be a robust sort of university center enclave. You know, a robust private sector commercial or even state government. There's this institutional capacity building that needs to happen to have a fighting chance. You know? And who knows? Maybe with with people like Elon Musk and and a lot of new people who have who have come along, you know, into this in the past few years, that that might have a shot. But, you know, those those people are on a hit list, you know, between lawsuits and ad boycotts to try to cripple their capacities. So, you know, it's gonna be a 100 year war. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's that's fascinating. I think of, Thucydides talks about white nations go to war and it's because of fear, honor, or interest. In this case, it seems like these people go to war against their fellow countrymen for all those three reasons at the same time. You mentioned fear of losing it all, gaining honor within particularly on club, and then interest to that, you know, money, fame, whatever that case may be. A shiny, you know, desk, you know, your name on a desk that's that's prestigious or whatever. It's it's kinda sickening. Yeah. I mean Speaker 2: yeah. It seems like status is a huge piece of that. Yeah. What so now current present day landscape, what are you thinking about? I'm still we're coming up next year's an election year, but what's on your radar, in the censorship landscape right now? Speaker 0: Well, everything. You know? It's it's a multi front, you know, offensive that's needed. So so you need, you know, you need legal. There's multiple lawsuits, you know, in the works. So there's a Supreme Court case, which could frankly decide the entire architecture of how pieces on the chessboard can even move, next year, which is before the Supreme Court now. I have an amicus brief that I submitted on that, and, you know, the the the Missouri State Attorney General's office is doing a fantastic job. I'm I'm optimistic that Clarence Thomas will never be so unleashed on a nefarious government overreach than, than than this one. But, the extent you know, I don't doubt some positive resolution, but the extent of it is going to be where the magic is. You know, it's one thing to kill coordination at the government level. It's a whole another thing to go after the pass throughs and cut outs in that relationship. And my fear is a Solomon splitting the baby, which will which could result in the censorship industry actually being more resilient because everything will be, you know, will move through these through these cutouts. And frankly, we have the best fact pattern in this case that we'll ever have. These people are never again going to make the mistake of saying direct quotes, like, we're, you know, like, we're not allowed by law to do this, so we set up this, you know, this separate thing to do it. And that thing goes on, you know, to to describe how the company now the tech companies themselves would not have adopted these censorship platforms without their pressure and without their threatening government pressure. I mean, you you it's like, you know, if you've ever seen that that confession skit from Key and Peele where, you know, the Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: The the rap guy is sitting before the, you know, the the New York Police Department investigator, and they're they're playing back a rap tape of everything that's needed to convict this person all the way down to, you know, his alibi at Red Lobster being preannounced and everything like that. We we will never again have these people so, so dead to rights. So, good facts make, you know, good law, bad facts make bad law. And we we there's, I think, a majority on the court who should be sympathetic to this, It should be 9 o. But the fact if with this court, at this at this fact, pattern, with this much political momentum, if we can't notch a very, very significant victory here, then the strategy is gonna be very different going forward than if if we if if that can be leveraged. But, look, you got legal you got regulatory, not just at congress itself. And it's not just a presidential election next year, it's a senate one as well. And in a in a senate victory would be very powerful to be able to actually have bills passed. Right now, there's things that you can do in appropriations, there's things you can do on funding, but you can't get bills passed around it, around censorship, because that the Senate is never gonna ratify that. With with turnover in the senate, these things become possible. But then you also have regulatory stuff happening at the state level. You know, you have multiple anti censorship, state statutes being set up for sort of civilian freedom, you know, cyber bill of rights type stuff. You have this in Florida, you have this in Texas, there's 6 or 7 other states who are interested in this, creating private rights of action. I think there's a lot that can be done at the state government level. You have the you have the media level. I mean, the fact is is as much as it's already been exposed, we're still at the tip of the iceberg level. And there's a ton of stuff that I'm gonna be doing in the next year that I'm hugely excited about, but I almost don't wanna talk about it just to not put it out there, you know, before it's out. But, no. This this thing is gonna blow up in the next year, and I think, you know, the question is is what happens when they raise the stakes? What hap Jim Jordan had a subpoena into the Stanford Air and Observatory for the gold mine of all federal censorship collusion documents between the Department of Homeland Security, the Intelligence Services, the top cutouts. It's all being housed at the Stanford Internet Observatory. Jim Jordan's weaponization committee specifically subpoenaed it. Stanford said, you know what? We're not turning it over. Go f yourself. Jim Jordan is, like, threatened to, like, subpoena enforcement, but, like, I don't know where that ends up. Is the just is the is this justice department, which is indicting the leading opposition candidate for, like, a 1000 years in prison in 4 different cases right now, and which has screwed over systematically. It's totally thrown off the yoke Mhmm. Of non partisanship. I mean, is this Justice Department going to enforce subpoenas or contempt orders for people who defy congressional? I mean, this is the House Judiciary Committee. This was supposed to be the oversight of of the of the justice department. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: But, you know, Frankenstein's monster has now completely taken over. So they've escalated it to rule of law, which has completely broken every every tacit agreement we've all understood about how our own government works. But what do you do about that? This is a brand new world, you know, will they sustain it? Frankly, I think a critical mass of them are going to need to defect or will need to be wedged, you know, for for for them to put down that that weapon. But this is the sort of stuff that that true authoritarian countries do, that the state department complains about. And the reason they complain is because it's unstoppable. If you really do have a closed society where, like, the military and the courts and, like, everything is so rigged against political opposition, you can't even start a political opposition movement. This is why the CIA hates them because they can't pop up their own opposition movements. But we have, like, a totally organic thing here, and they're basically doing what they accused Saddam Hussein, you know, Yanukovych, Gaddafi of. But, you know, Merrick Garland is doing Speaker 1: it. Yeah. Absolutely. And they're you you said right. I think the stakes they're raising the stakes on their end. Biden just had this executive order against or about regulating AI and how, you know, basically there has to be equitable outcomes and certain there were other sub documents cutouts if you would, explaining how, you know, compute power at a certain threshold and above has to be I mean, just absolutely insane stuff. And I was and then I was reading an article, that Biden watched, the new Mission Impossible movie, which has a bad AI the the enemy is AI. And after watching that movie, he was even more scared of AI. And then he he he he drafted this, this executive order. You're like, this is clown work. This is insane. What do you think their so you kinda described right now the path to, at least not victory, but the path over the next couple of years on our side. What do you think their winning condition is, their winning state? If if, you know, their ideal winning condition, what does that look like on that side? Speaker 0: There's there's 3 ways. 1 is rule of law. That is, a great example right now is this Digital Services Act in the EU, which I personally worked on at state. This thing is is a monstrosity, but it it it compels censorship of disinformation all across the European Union. This is like 450,000,000 people who are gonna be subject you know, x might not be able to operate in the European Union. I mean, think about what that will do to the platform if something like that happens. The entire global connectivity of x, which is, arguably, it's like top value proposition. Like, you get to go on on x and see what Imran Khan, you know, is I mean, he's got Imran Khan, the press the prime minister of Pakistan is one of the largest accounts. You know, you have, you know, you have, like, Hot Wars being semi negotiated with Twitter. You know, you had, you know, the Ayatollah and the, you know, UK, you know, or I'm sorry. The Israeli ministries, you know, like, meaning, you know, in an actual hot meme war. But, you know, you have this big interlinkage between political parties across, on the transatlantic side. You know, there's a big overlap between Brexit, coalition, you know, the the Brexit coalition in the UK, and the MAGA coalition in the US. And a lot of that, you know, they would retweet each other, they would amplify each other. The reason you get 200,000 views on your YouTube video with Nigel Farage chewing out Herman Van Brunkoy as a low grade bank clerk well, like, a 150 of those 1,000 of those views may be coming from the US from people who just wanna, you know, see, you know, see a Bulgarian barbarian, you know, put his put his arm through the net in in a in a shack dunk on on international institutions, but you don't get that inner linkage if, like, you know, if x is not allowed to, you know Mhmm. You can't you can't be on that platform. Now they they've got various leverage points there, for example, like, I something I've talked about a lot is this idea of middleware, which is this whole sort of intelligence backed, Pentagon backed, State Department backed, sweep sweeping set of censorship mercenary firms, like NewsGuard, and Global Disinformation Index, and Check My Ads, and all these all these technically non governmental, you know, credibility rating, and and disinformation tracking, private sector tools and firms, who are already billing themselves as as providing disinformation compliance services for government regulations in the EU. Having seen this movie play out in so in so many other sectors, I suspect that that the move they're going to play here is to say, listen, Elon, you don't wanna, you know, it you got a you got a great company, spent a lot of money on it. It'd be a shame if something happened to it where you got severed off from all of Europe. If you, you know, will allow you to simply, you know, comply with the comply with the Digital Services Act if you simply engage 1 of 6 or 7, you know, approved credentialing institutions who will do the you run your company, you know, add your premium services, add video audio play, and add payments and whatever. But this one thing, disinformation compliance, you know, we're gonna need a firm, you know, or or a or a group within the company, like the Aaron Roderick's group, a cell that will simply just just outsource it to them and then go back to sleep. Sweet dreams. Run your $1,000,000,000 company. No. It's just disinformation. You know? It's not a big deal. And then through that, they will reinstall the same apparatus to rig every election on the planet as they had in their their golden age from 2018 to 2022. I suspect that's what we're moving to. You see the same thing with UK harms, online harms bill, which is outside the EU, but it's it's UK's version of it. Australia's got this new misinformation bill, Canada. They're doing this surround sound of of of, rule of law, censorship predicates that will, I think, that's the thing I'm most concerned about because there are other paths to victory. There's ways of fighting it at the political and at the persuasion level. I mentioned there were 3 at the at the top of this. One of them is a rule of law. You're just a frigging authoritarian, you know, despot, and you just win because you control the army and the courts. And, you know, the 2 other ways are like institutional capture, if they can, you know, just get the companies to just go along willingly. Mhmm. And it's not just x, by the way, and Elon Musk who are pushing back on that now. I think when Elon took over, it actually emboldened some of the other tech companies. Jack Dorsey made a public statement that he didn't want to kick Trump off Twitter. He did it because of business necessity. Because they were gonna bankrupt Twitter 1.0 through through ad boycotts if they didn't censor, you know, who they wanted. So civil society encirclement is is the other path to victory for them, where they if they surround free speech platforms like X or like Rumble, with enough civil society institutions, you know, they swarm them with, you know, the Biden administration is paying about $50,000,000 to 60 different US colleges and universities, all working on censorship. All for their own proprietary centers, which go into these feeders to pressure X to kill the accounts that they flagged, to kill the emerging narratives on all these issues. So, you know, you're surrounded by 60 Universities there. You're surrounded by probably a 100 different State Department NGOs, all significantly influential in their own rank. You're surrounded by about 3 dozen, you know, Private Sector Censorship mercenary firms. You're surrounded by about, you know, a 70 70 or so different, you know, fact checking organizations who also provide pressure from that. And you're surrounded by 7 or 8 government agencies who are all, involved in censorship pressure coordination, funding, or outsourcing in some way. So those are this is you're surrounding the whole corporate entity. And the winning condition for them is to simply bring the tech companies to heal via getting them to change their business model. I mean, if you can kill their ads and the company will go under, then you have a leveraging chip to say, okay, well, listen, you the ads will come rushing back the moment you put our people in for, you know, for censoring. You bring back the Aaron Rodricks team, you know, you bring in our computer science people who are gonna write your machine learning code on, you know, on, election integrity, You know, you you bring in these compliant disinformation compliance people, and all good. Suddenly, the global advert you know, the GARM and the World Advertisers Federation, and suddenly, you'll be back in their good graces, and you'll have a high NewsGuard credibility score, and and you'll be you'll be, you know, in good standing in the European Union. All of your business problems will go away if you do what the government wants you to do. I mean, it's basically a destabilization strategy on par with how we do economic sanctions to destabilize Syria or Cuba or Venezuela or, you know, Libya. I mean, this is, you get a swarm of international institutions, You get the media on board, you get the private sector money flowing in to pump it up, and you you get sanctions to cut off all their little alliances. That's why Institutional Capacity Building is so important for us, because they know that that is the thing that inoculates you from that tactic. So right now, we're in the thick of trench warfare of of, you know, the capacities of the censorship industry and the capacities of institutions supporting free speech online. Speaker 1: Mike, thank you so much. You've been super generous with your time. Where can people follow you and follow the fight? Speaker 0: You can find me on Twitter at mikebencyber, and, our foundation is is foundation for freedom online.com. And, yeah, looking forward to talking soon. Speaker 1: Awesome. Thanks, Mike. Thanks so much, Mike. Have a good one. Speaker 2: Thanks for listening to this episode of the Newfounding podcast. Newfounding has become a rallying point for founders and investors who are taking serious bets in the face of a stagnant business culture. Our venture fund backs founders building dynamic companies powered by American ideals and a positive national vision. These are the kinds of founders that embody the optimism and competence of the people who come on this podcast. If you're interested in investing in our fund, check out newfounding.com/venturefund, and follow the link to apply.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Media Matters is pure evil

Saved - November 28, 2023 at 10:08 PM

@DakotaSidwell - D.Sauce (TIE)

@LizCrokin The @reSeeIt archive lives forever

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

@DakotaSidwell @elonmusk Preserving 𝕏 posts has never been easier with reSeeIt! 🔥 @DakotaSidwell, this thread 🧵 is secured with IPFS 🪐 and a blockchain record. Access it forever, see related posts by clicking here 👇 https://resee.it/tweet/1729511790638145918

reSee.it #34148 - @elonmusk AI summary, screenshot, and permanently saved 𝕏 Post Thread from @elonmusk resee.it
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 4:53 AM

@Cancelcloco - Cancelthisclothingcompany

Daily reminder- your phone is spying on you guys. https://t.co/qbOms2ictC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential dangers of phone surveillance and the Pegasus software. They mention that the phone could be a portal to the CIA and criticize the lack of oversight and safeguards imposed by Congress. The speaker also highlights Israel's role in developing surveillance and AI technology. They mention instances where the Pegasus software has been used to target human rights activists and journalists. The speaker expresses concern about the tracking of digital information by foreign governments and emphasizes that the US government is equally sinister in tracking digital footprints without oversight. They caution listeners to be mindful of their online activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. No. I bought a Magneto helmet. I know you bought a Magneto helmet. That way they can't read my push note if they need it. Okay. First off, cool hat, bro. Second off, do we not all already realize that your phone could potentially be a full on portal to the CIA? This is last year without congressional or court approval or oversight with few, if any, safeguards imposed by Congress. Fuck you, New York Times. I'm not paying for your article. The FBI wanted the Pegasus software For domestic surveillance, the Pegasus software turns your phone into a 24 hour surveillance device. They can control it. They can view it. They can track it in real time. Israel is essential in the development of Surveillance and AI technology. And they've been testing it there for quite some time now. There are layers to what's going on here. This isn't happening just in the United States, but you're dang straight it's happening in the United States. Pegasus software has been used to target human rights activists and journalists like this guy who was that worded Inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul after criticizing the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. This guy Who's really good friends with the Bush family. That's a whole other rabbit hole. They've been testing out this technology in Mexico Where freelance journalists just wind up hanging out in hammocks for the rest of their lives. But I'm sure it had nothing to do with the fact that Pegasus can geolocate your phone in real time. So, Pearlman, that's a cool hat you got there and all. But, I'm actually not really that stressed about the foreign governments that are tracking my digital information And my digital footprint because our government is far more sinister than any of the other ones. And They are most definitely tracking our digital footprints in every way imaginable. And there's no oversight because We're at war, and anyone might be an enemy combatant. So just think carefully about what you do on the Internet these days.
Saved - January 9, 2024 at 5:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am a member of the community notes on X, where I fact-check posts and provide sources. It's a decentralized platform that challenges the narrative of big corporations. While it's not perfect, it's our tool against propaganda. However, I've noticed popular accounts spreading more fake news, possibly for financial gain. This undermines trust and legitimacy. I urge creators to prioritize truth over profit and remember their power to change the world. Let's start with a blank post and our conscience.

@LHDSR_TV - 𝕷'𝖍𝖊𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝖉𝖊 𝖘𝖊 𝖗𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖎𝖑𝖑𝖊𝖗.✒️

#coupdegueule #x_influencers je vous préviens, c'est long, mais c'est important. ⏳introduction: community notes je fais partie des personnes qui rédigent des community notes lorsqu'il s'agit d'ajouter un contexte, de rectifier une erreur d'interprétation ou simplement dire que l'information est fausse tout en apportant des sources d'autorité. ce qui peut être certaines fois délicat car les sources d'autorité, on le sait, sont pour l'instant monopolisées par les grands groupes qui n'ont qu'un intérêt: maintenir leur propre narratif. #giletsjaunes #covid19 nous nous sommes faits censurer et traiter violemment de tous les côtés depuis 2018 et l'opportunité pour quiconque de pouvoir participer à la vérité, engage également des responsabilités. je prends cette tâche à cœur car les violents traitements mensongers qu'ont subis certaines personnes qui ont eu le courage de dire la vérité, doit cesser. fin de l'oligarchie de l'information ? je trouve le principe décentralisé de @communitynotes, complété par son algorithme, bien plus juste pour la vérité qu'une équipe de salariés en interne (ancien twitter, facebook, youtube... soumise à sa direction, aux lobbies, ainsi qu'aux accès secrets avérés (backdoors) du fbi, des partis politiques, des gouvernements). ce n'est pas juste pour la liberté d'expression quasi totale que nous avons sur x, que les puissants ragent contre cette plateforme, mais pour l'outil mis en place par @elonmusk qui est capable grâce à chacun d'entre nous de dire officiellement "faux" à la propagande. le système n'est pas parfait, loin de là. il existe une guerre invisible left/right au sein des community notes que vous ne voyez pas. mais c'est tout ce que nous avons face au narratif, quand la consommation et le partage de contenus se fait, sans que l'exactitude des faits annoncés dans un post soit avérée. la majorité des utilisateurs ne prennent pas, ou n'ont juste pas le temps pour fact-checker des milliers d'informations quotidiennes sur leur feed. alors j'ai décidé d'y participer à ma hauteur et c'est toujours savoureux de voir les géants que nous dénonçons se voir affichés une community note, avec source à l'appui, quant auparavant, nous étions contraints de faire plus de bruit que le géant... en vain. l'algorithme community notes de x en tant que 'membre des community notes', x me demande (utilisateur) régulièrement de fact checker certains posts polémiques ou notes avec sources d'autorité à l'appui. ce qu'il faut comprendre, c'est que ce n'est pas la majorité qui gagne. plusieurs notes peuvent être rédigées pour le même post, et la note choisie est celle qui révèle un véritable consensus entre ceux qui, habituellement sont en désaccord. je trouve le concept aussi bien plus juste que wikipedia (gang de fact-checkers complices) et pour cela, je reconnais qu'elon nous a offert un outil qui mérite d'exister. ⌛️j'en viens donc à mon coup de gueule. malheureusement on le voit, force est de constater que plus les comptes grossissent leurs abonnés, plus la gâchette est facile sur les fake news qui boostent notre dopamine. je le vois dans mon feed, mais également dans ma section notes. pourquoi certains comptes populaires diffusent de plus en plus de fake news? au delà de l'erreur et la malhonnêteté intellectuelle, on peut y ajouter un élément important: un compte vérifié avec une coche bleue qui réussit à faire plus de 5 millions d'impressions (vues) en 3 mois, est éligible pour toucher une part des profits réalisés par x grâce à l'argent que les annonceurs lui paient, pour se retrouver sur votre feed. en d'autres termes, x rémunère les comptes qui génèrent le plus d'engagement et x, semble-t-il, rémunère très bien en ce moment. je ne peux le confirmer en ce qui me concerne, je n'ai pas encore atteint ce palier. cercle vertueux gagner sa vie en faisant des recherches importantes pour sa communauté est tout à fait honorable, la communauté n'a plus besoin de soutenir financièrement le travail du créateur pour qu'il ait la possibilité de continuer: a. le créateur créé du contenu de qualité pour sa communauté b. les abonnés reçoivent ce contenu de qualité gratuitement c. si l'engagement est suffisant, le créateur est rémunéré par x c'est un cercle vertueux. l'erreur est humaine diffuser de la désinformation par erreur n'est pas grave, ça arrive, on admet son erreur, on retire son post et on fait attention à ne plus alimenter la confusion, justement souhaitée par les médias mainstream pour nous remettre dans la case des “complotistes”. cercle vicieux le faire plusieurs fois par semaine et collectionner la désinformation dans son feed, c'est vouloir accumuler des impressions (le créateur dit qu'il a vu que c'était une fake news, mais... puisque ça va continuer à générer des impressions et donc des revenus, autant laisser le post là où il est). c'est un cercle vicieux. la confiance 💎 chaque compte avec un nombre d'abonnés significatif devrait comprendre que cette confusion détruit non seulement la confiance que les personnes ont en nous individuellement, mais bien pire : certains nous faisant confiance repartagent cette fausse information à d'autres inconnus, nos amis, notre famille etc... et c'est toute la légitimité d'une communauté, d'un mouvement, de la vérité qui en fait les frais. moralement, c'est inacceptable. surtout de la part de ceux qui se disent "éveillés". je sais que sans le soutien financier des personnes qui ont permis à ma chaîne youtube l'heure de se réveiller d'être un véritable pavé dans la mare dès 2018, je n'aurais pas pris autant de risques pour dénoncer ce(ux) que j'avais à révéler. sans vous, #lhdsr n'existe pas. alors pourquoi retournerai-je ma veste ? pour l'argent ? jamais. certains le savent déjà, c'est au show business et à un revenu très confortable que j'ai tourné le dos il y a quelques années, pour dénoncer le mensonge, la propagande et la souffrance. je n'oublierai pas d'où je viens. conclusion ce post ne vise personne en particulier et s'adresse à tout le monde, je souhaite à chaque créateur d'avoir un véritable succès, mais pas au sacrifice de la vérité. alors, que vous ayez 15, 150, 1500, 15 000, 150 000 ou 1.5M d'abonnés, sachez que vous avez le pouvoir de changer le monde, pour le bien comme pour le mauvais. et dans ce monde digital ayant un véritable impact sur la réalité, ça commence avec un post vierge et votre conscience. j'ai terminé.

Saved - January 24, 2024 at 11:44 AM

@QkrSocialist - Quaker | #EndTheGenocide #StopCopCity #FreeTheLand

For posts with evidence of genocide, use this phrase as a reply to the post: @reSeeIt save this for .@CIJ_ICJ

@Fr33Rang3 - freerange.nft

@c_plushie @YouTube I strongly propose on X to use http://resee.it the gem is, & i don't how they do it, but even though they been deplatformed off X, simply putting "@reseeit save this" & the post is minted on the #Polygon #Blockchain Permanently 🤔 even a month after being canned 👾

reSee.it - Permanently Save Tweets Permanently save any Tweet with the power of blockchain and distributed storage. resee.it
Saved - February 12, 2024 at 8:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk explains the difference between freedom of speech and freedom of reach. He believes that controversial statements don't need to be broadcasted to the entire country. He also criticizes personalized algorithms that curate information based on individual preferences, as it can destroy content creators and control technology. The future of content and messaging is concerning, but there is a determination to fight against it.

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

Elon tells us exactly why we're being suppressed on 𝕏: 🧵+📽️ 1/11 "There's a big difference between freedom of speech and freedom of reach. "Whatever you say, however controversial then does not need to be broadcast to the whole country." https://t.co/uq9xT44MHq

Video Transcript AI Summary
People want to use platforms that are appealing and comfortable, so freedom of speech should have limits. Shadow banning and algorithmic suppression are making people less visible on platforms like YouTube. This information war prevents real truth from being discovered. While freedom of speech allows people to say anything, controversial statements don't need to be broadcasted to the whole country. Twitter should let people express themselves within the law but limit who sees their content based on user preferences. Personalized algorithms are destroying content creators who aren't part of the mainstream system. This control over messages is social engineering and mind control. Despite this, people will fight against it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that means that means it must be something that is appealing to people. It it it obviously cannot be a place where they feel uncomfortable or harassed, or they'll simply not use it. So it, and I I think there's there's this big difference between freedom of speech and freedom of breach. Speaker 1: There we go. You could say whatever you want, but that don't mean you're going to be able to reach people. We're already seeing this happen across all Platforms, even YouTube. Shadow banning is this the old way of describing it. But now it's a type of algorithmic suppression where you're just less visible. Right. I've gotten hundreds of complaints from you guys talking about you've been unsubscribed. You never know when I'm live. You never get The recommendations or notifications, this is all a part of that. This is a massive information war, and real truth, actual truth, actual thinking people aren't to be discovered, at least not to a certain point. We're allowed to operate and we're allowed to reach To to a point, right, to a fault, until it's too far, and then everything just goes down. Speaker 0: And that one can Obviously, let's say, in United States, go in the middle of Times Square and pretty much yell anything you want and you you'll annoy the people around you, But but you're you're you're kind of allowed to just sort of yell whatever you want in in in, you know, a crowded public place, more or less. Apart from this is This is a robbery, probably that would get you in trouble. So, but but then that that Whatever you say, have a controversial does not need to then be broadcast to the whole country. So I think, generally, the approach of Twitter should be to, let people say what they wanna do within the balance of the law, but then, limit the, you know, who sees that, based on, any given Twitter user's preferences. Speaker 1: Wow. Do you see what's happening? This is Surely reify digital silos by way of algorithm. What he's saying is we are going to, through personalized algorithms, Curate information and messages to the preferences of the individual. Do you know how this is going to destroy all content creators that aren't, say, legacy or that aren't, say, promoted by the Overall, bigger mainstream system because it just splinters all data, all content Into these structured curated algorithms that target individuals instead of, say, groups or instead of, say, hashtags. So now you're only going to see what the algorithm thinks you prefer. That is crazy. That is absolutely insane. And this is a way to control. Again, technology is essentially a mechanism of control. Cybernetics as a as a technological Process in science is all about control. The cybernetic techno type transhumanists All about controlling things through technology. This is a perfect example of that. Literally controlling what messages people get under the guise of, well, it's what you prefer. It's so sick, man. This is literal social engineering and mind control. When we think of algorithms, we'll be shaping messages, Promoting others, limiting others, silencing completely many others. It's just, Wow. Is this the future, man? Is this is this really the future of content? Did anyone ask for this? Of course not. So sick, man. It's so sick, but we will fight. That's for sure. We will fight.

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

2/11 "Whatever you say, however controversial then does not need to be broadcast to the whole country." https://t.co/T17F0TGc3U

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

3/11 "So I think generally the approach to Twitter is to let people say what they want to do within the bounds of the law, but then limit who sees that based on any given Twitter user's preferences." https://t.co/xMHrEBn55K

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

4/11 "Do you see what's happening? This is purely reified digital silos by way of algorithm. What he's saying is that we are through personalized algorithms, and curate information and messages to the preferences of the individual." https://t.co/WxypvllRzX

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

5/11 "Do you know how this is going to destroy all content creators that aren't, say, legacy or that aren't say, promoted by the overall bigger mainstream system." https://t.co/gRoMy9YXjJ

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

6/11 "Because it just splinters all data, all content into these structured, curated algorithms that target individuals instead of say groups, or instead of say hashtags?" https://t.co/6gRAHDB8Vb

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

7/11 "So now you're only going to see what the algorithm thinks you prefer. That is crazy. That is absolutely insane. And this is a way to control, again, technology is essentially just a mechanism for control." https://t.co/TodJ7jNYVI

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

8/11 "Literally controlling what messages people get under the guise of, 'Well, this is what you prefer'. It's so sick, man. This is literal social engineering and mind control." https://t.co/U0l2yDy32x

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

9/11 "Cybernetics as a technological process in science is all about control. The cybernetic technocrat-type transhumanists are all about controlling through technology. This is just a perfect example of that." https://t.co/elMWisSiBm

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

10/11 "When we think of algorithms, will be shaping messages. Promoting others, limiting others, silencing completely many others. It's just...wow, is this the future, man? Is this really the future of content?" https://t.co/WytGO4bX7p

@ladykennington - Haley Kennington

11/11 "Did anyone ask for this? Of course not. It's so sick man. It's so sick. But we will fight, that's for sure. We will fight." H/T Dayz of Noah: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmlLoDCaHWA&t=6607s

Saved - March 7, 2024 at 8:33 PM

@TruthtideTV - TruthtideTV

We've long advised not to place microwave transmitters into the ear canal, knowing that your brain absorbs RF like a wet sponge.  has created even more reasons not to microwave your skull, now that Airpods can be used to feed EEG data to Tik Tok to turbocharge their algorithm https://t.co/9SrJvQkOFv

Saved - November 24, 2024 at 2:22 AM

@LizCrokin - LIZ CROKIN

When you call out the censorship & criminality on Elon Musk’s X, you get muted, kicked out off a space and then your phone gets wiped out. Lucky for me, there was a ghost who captured it all. 👻 Good morning @KSJ_Kreative — I hope there are no “key words” that trigger you today.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm targeted for exposing Pizzagate, which I've been reporting on for eight years, while Elon Musk, who owns this platform, can discuss it without issues. It’s confusing that he can draw attention to Pizzagate, yet I face demonetization and identity theft. The criminal activity surrounding my name on this platform is extensive. Many claim that this platform is great for independent journalists, but that’s misleading. There’s fraud and scams, and making money here is reserved for a select few. I’ve done thorough research and have evidence to support this. It’s frustrating to see others mislead people about the opportunities here while we face these challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Future. But I'm I'm sorry about that, Luz. Well, I appreciate your feedback and, you know, the whole thing with, oh, you use this word or that word and you're gonna flag. You know? I know I'm targeted because I exposed Pizzagate, and I have been doing that. Actually, I'm the only reporter from the mainstream media that has done it and has continued to do it for 8 years. And Elon Musk, who allegedly owns and runs this platform, has been talking about Pizzagate too. So, you know, it's really confusing to me because, you know, he can post about Pizzagate and draw attention to it, and he has no well, he owns it, so, of course, he has no problems. But someone like me does have problems, and it doesn't make sense to me. It's it's like, if he owns this platform, then why is he and he's exposing Pizzagate. He's drawing attention to it. Then why is he allowing the only journalist that exposed it to be targeted and demonetized? And I've had my identity stolen. I've had scams run-in my name. I mean, the amount of criminal activity that's happened in my name on this platform is insane. We're not just talking about shadow banning or all these little things. It goes way beyond that. And I gotta say something to you guys. I really find it very disingenuous with people on x that hold spaces, and they talk about how much money you can make from x, oh, and how it's so great, and it's this free speech platform, and, oh, you can make more money on x than YouTube, and blah blah blah. Oh, and x is the place where independent journalists and content creators can thrive. That's a lie. That is a total lie. It's a bait and switch. I've done 100 of hours of research on it. I completely understand what's going on. There is fraud. There is criminal activity on this platform, and there's a lot of scams going on. And you cannot make more money on this platform unless you're one of the chosen ones. And that's a fact, and I have the receipts to prove it. So I do not like that people like you guys go in these spaces, and you're conning people, telling them, oh, get Oh, Oh, you don't like it? You come here to leave at us. You too. Like, you come you come here in our space and scream at us. This is very unfriendly. We have been very respectful to
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 5:07 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“These are Brain sensors that are starting to be embedded in everyday devices” The Globalist Lunatics want to control your very thoughts. https://t.co/bBHfWKbo2j

Video Transcript AI Summary
Durable brain sensors are being integrated into everyday devices, moving beyond niche mindfulness products. Advances in AI have improved the quality of brain signal detection and allowed for miniaturization. Major tech companies are now investing in this area, creating a significant market opportunity. Products like earbuds, watches, and headphones featuring these sensors are being released this year and in the next two years. Initially, they will read basic brain states, such as fatigue, attention, and emotions. Additionally, they may enable simple interactions with other technologies and will be incorporated into virtual reality headsets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Durable devices. So these are brain sensors, that are starting to be embedded in everyday devices, but until now have been a number of niche companies that really have focused on mindfulness and meditation. The use of, for example, brain centers that can pick up electrical activity in the brain at a pretty low resolution, but advances in AI have both improved what the signal is that can come from the brain, and enable the miniaturization, of those products. As a lot of the major tech companies start to invest, in these brain sensors, it's a huge, I think, untapped market in many ways of integrating them into everyday devices. These are earbuds or watches or headphones and the soft cups around the ears. Many of those products are hitting the market this year, and others are hitting them within the next 2 years such that people can listen to music, a phone call, etcetera while having those devices in years. Initially what they will be capable of doing is very high level brain state reading things like are you tired? Are you paying attention? Is your mind wandering? Are you happy or sad? They may be enable interaction like up down, left, right for interaction with other technologies, and they're being embedded into things like, visual, virtual reality headset.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 7:02 PM

@sewneo - S.B. Alger 🤓🎸🎤

You can save the stuff that might disappear from this platform by using this tool, even though, it shows the account is suspended, the functionality still exists! Check out that database link

@HolaKetty - Ketty D

@DonnaLeist @DecentBackup @reSeeIt They were suspended when his og handle @DecentFiJC was. The tool still works. You can access all archived content by searching for his current or former handle on their website https://resee.it/ https://t.co/1tBD71q2BC

Saved - February 18, 2025 at 3:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across a shocking incident where someone burned 500 ETH, equating to about $1.4 million, while accusing the bosses of Kuande Investment, Feng Xin and Xu Yuzhi, of using brain-computer weapons to control employees. The individual behind this act, Hu Lezhi, claims to have suffered from mind control since birth and feels completely stripped of dignity. He expresses deep pain and a desire for the world to end, highlighting the military deployment of brain-computer chips and the emergence of new forms of digital enslavement.

@tryPluid - Pluid

BREAKING: Someone just burnt 500 ETH (~$1,400,000) by sending it to 0x000... and wrote the following message 👇 "The bosses of Kuande Investment: Feng Xin and Xu Yuzhi used brain-computer weapons to persecute all company employees and former employees, and even they themselves were controlled." (h/t @sassal0x)

@tryPluid - Pluid

Extra messages being sent (h/t @0xG00gly & @lmkfun):

@tryPluid - Pluid

Details as of now 👇

@Loopifyyy - Loopify 🧙‍♂️

What I could find on the guy who burnt millions of dollars and donated millions of dollars 👇: Total burnt: ~$1,650,000 (603 ETH) Total donated: ~$5,350,000 (1,950 ETH) Messages on-chain: The bosses of Kuande Investment: Feng Xin and Xu Yuzhi used brain-computer weapons to persecute all company employees and former employees, and even they themselves were controlled. I am Hu Lezhi, an ordinary programmer and entrepreneur. Since October 2022, I realized that I have been monitored and manipulated by the mind control organization since I was born. When I realized the existence of the mind control organization, they also increased their harm to me. I have been very painful in the past two years. Now I have completely lost my dignity as a human being. I have decided to leave this world and hope that this ugly world will be destroyed soon. Brain-computer chips have been deployed militarily on a large scale. All military powers are using base stations, radios and nano-brain-computer chips to control all citizens. As the brain-computer interface and mind-reading technology keeps developing, there is a new mode of crime in which wild animals become puppets or complete slaves to the digital machine. There is a new mode of crime in which the victim is gradually deprived of his senses of desire until he becomes a complete slave to the digital machine, and if one day I become a victim of the final stage, I will leave the world. 宽德投资的老总:冯鑫,徐御之使用脑机武器迫害了所有公司员工以及前员工,甚至他们自己本身也是受控者。 我是胡乐知,一名普通的程序员,创业者。自2022年10月以来,我意识到我从出生起就遭受着脑控组织的监控和摆布。而当我意识到脑控组织的存在时,他们也在加大对我的伤害,这两年我过得非常痛苦,现在已经到了身而为人的尊严彻底丧失的地步,我决定离开这个世界,也希望这个丑陋的世界早日毁灭。 脑机芯片已经大规模军事化部署了,所有的军事强国都在用基站、无线电和纳米脑机芯片控制所有国民 随着脑机接口和读心技术不断发展,出现了一种新的犯罪模式:野生动物沦为数字机器的傀儡或完全的奴隶 目前出现了一种新的奴役受害者的犯罪模式,受害者的欲望感官被逐渐剥夺,直到最后完全成为数字机器的奴隶,如果有一天我成为了最后阶段的受害者,我会选择离开这个世界

@tryPluid - Pluid

Read the full article: https://console.pluid.com/article/millions-of-dollars-vanish-as-someone-burns-and-donates-2553-eth-7-000-000-my5kaq5y8s?ref=2dM7pCy4sbleanW2MNT0KclYW9g

Anonymous Individual Burns Millions Of Dollars To Spread " | Pluid Console Everything we know about the anonymous individual who just burnt and donated around 2553 ETH ($7,000,000) to spread "Brain Computer" weapon message console.pluid.com
Saved - February 27, 2025 at 10:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring the evolution of mind control technologies, which have been around for decades but are now more sophisticated. Techniques like acoustics, optogenetics, and electromagnetic fields can influence brain activity. Historical patents, such as the 1992 Brain Wave Synchronizer, show how light and sound can manipulate mental states. With advancements in smart cities and the Internet of Bodies, our environments could become neural interfaces, raising concerns about behavior modification and surveillance. Awareness and countermeasures are essential as we navigate this digital landscape.

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🚨 #Mind #Control #Tech Isn’t New—It’s Just Upgraded 🧠💡📡 They’ve been using #acoustics, #optogenetics (#LEDs, #VLC, #quantumdots), & #electromagnetic fields to modulate brain activity for decades— https://t.co/E5daHQIlcu

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

hidden behind research in neurological therapy, cognitive enhancement, & bio-digital interfacing. https://t.co/PWC3Wa7aoy

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔥 1992 Brain Wave Synchronizer – US5306228A This patent details a system that entrains human brain waves using modulated light pulses & audio signals, forcing the brain into specific states (sleep, relaxation, alertness, or susceptibility). https://t.co/W5vDG9HU07

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

Frequency manipulation = Brainwave control. But let’s go deeper: 🧠 Acoustic & Optical Modulation – The Next-Gen Mind Control? https://t.co/mGmEwq1Hhj

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

1️⃣ Optogenetics + Smart Lighting + 6G 🔹 Quantum dot-enabled VLC (Visible Light Communication) can pulse light at imperceptible speeds, embedding signals into streetlights, QLED screens, VR headsets, & wearables. https://t.co/4pPBS6kbL7

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔹 Smart cities = Smart light grids = potential to influence mood, cognition, & behavior. 🔹 Quantum dot emitters in LED lighting can act as biological interfaces, altering neurochemistry. https://t.co/2rwQVVvi9v

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

2️⃣ Acoustic Neuromodulation (Ultrasound, Directed Energy, V2K, ELF Waves) 🔸 The brain is highly susceptible to ultrasonic & low-frequency electromagnetic waves. 🔸 Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation (FUN) has already been used to remotely modulate neurons. https://t.co/uDONQ8rI92

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔸 V2K (Voice-to-Skull) & ELF waves can implant thoughts, emotions, and audio signals directly into the brain. 🔸 Neural dust & WBANs (Wireless Body Area Networks) integrate bioelectronic monitoring with potential remote-access capabilities. https://t.co/tVSoguPJCf

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

3️⃣ WBANs + Smart Screens & IoB (Internet of Bodies) 🔹 Wearables, biosensors, & even smartphones turn humans into walking nodes in the network. 🔹 QLED screens + smart lighting + 5G/6G nodes = a neuro-optical interface surrounding you at all times. https://t.co/wWFy0rU0s9

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔹 IoB = real-time biometric monitoring, behavioral prediction, & potential neuromodulation. ⏳ A Long Time Coming – This Ain’t New 📌 1950s-70s: MKULTRA, ELF waves, hypnosis, neurostimulation research. 📌 1980s: Patents on brainwave synchronization & acoustic mind influence. https://t.co/P9BvLDtA4k

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

📌 1992: Brain Wave Synchronizer (US5306228A) – Remote mind entrainment. 📌 2000s: DARPA develops BMIs, neural dust, & optogenetics. 📌 2010s-Present: 6G, Smart Cities, Quantum Dots, Bio-Digital Convergence, Neural Interfaces. https://t.co/Cxk8NFfZY3

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🚀 Where This Is Going – The Digital Prison The rollout of 6G Smart Cities, full-spectrum lighting grids, & IoB isn’t about convenience—it’s about saturating every inch of space with networks that can monitor, predict, & potentially modify human behavior at a neurological level. https://t.co/m6WaMrWns1

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔹 Streetlights, billboards, VR headsets, wearables… ALL become neural interfaces. 🔹 Predictive policing, emotion analysis, & “compliance enforcement” via neuro-optical modulation. 🔹 Bio-digital identification = biometric tracking + neural mapping. https://t.co/SFeBsCsDeP

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔴 Countermeasures – FLUXX RESISTANCE 1️⃣ Neural Hardening – Counter-frequency disruption, mental conditioning, awareness. 2️⃣ EM Shielding – Faraday tech, signal jamming, exposure reduction. 3️⃣ Optical Awareness – Detecting flicker patterns, embedded VLC signals.

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

4️⃣ Data Control – Limiting biometric & WBAN network exposure. 5️⃣ FLUXX FILTER – Cognitive firewall against synthetic perception control.

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🔥 Final Thought: If LEDs, sound waves, & EM signals can modulate the brain, then every smart device, streetlight, & screen is a potential neural interface.

@theamuzed1 - AMUZED X

🚨 The system is already built—how long before people connect the dots? We’re in the final stages of the Bio-Digital War—what happens next depends on awareness & action. 🚀🔥 #MindControl #SmartCities #Neurotech #BioDigitalConvergence #IoB #6G #FLUXXSTATE

Saved - June 14, 2025 at 2:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the disturbing realities of X, formerly Twitter, where censorship and manipulation run rampant. I've uncovered horrific content hidden in hashtags, with the platform seemingly complicit in allowing predators to thrive. Despite having the technology to address these issues, X appears to prioritize profits over safety, creating a toxic environment. I can no longer support a platform that harbors such darkness, and I’m choosing to leave for Truth Social, where I believe these problems do not exist.

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

🧵 X The Digital Devil's Den 🧵 The place we call X, formally Twitter the Social Media Platform, is anything but that. What lies on the surface is the censorship, propaganda, grifts, scams, and lies, imposing psychological manipulation of the public. What's below is far worse! https://t.co/eaY4nlFiU5

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

As most probably already know, I shed light on some incredibly uncomfortable horrors that exist on X hidden casually in hashtags. These hashtags allowed predators to communicate and mass distribute amongest each other. To make matters worse X is completely aware and complict. https://t.co/v17bN7w0Jt

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

This disturbing material is not there by accident. It had ZERO Guardrails unlike what you see on the surface level of X's Moderation. Many posts are labeled by different categories and some are even given the sensitive content warning, however none of it was implemented here. https://t.co/0MX9CTkIUX

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

The lack of Guardrails in place and the fact it was so easily roaming free looks intentional rather than neglectful. They have the technology to remove all of this right now, but they do not, even when they know it exists. If that doesn't have you saying WTF, brace yourself. https://t.co/noUD4f42tp

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Many kept wondering why the algorithm was never changing regarding censorship. It's because this algorithm is not only used to just control narratives, but also to hide what's below. It's all part of the same system created by Twitter that's now doing the exact same thing. https://t.co/3wM7NX2xvy

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

It's safe to assume that this stuff has been going on for a very long time. This isn't some nightmare shadow part of internet that they tell people about. It is downloadable right from the app store, disguised as social media, and hidden right under your noses using hashtags. https://t.co/8FDMYE9Qtc

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If your not completely disgusted yet, well it gets worse. Notice how all your "Save the Children" Grifters have been silent. This is because X is their Gravy Train and they don't want to disrupt that. For them the money and the clout are more important, some even defending X. https://t.co/HcW1uaitHO

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

While you are reading this and others scroll their timeline oblivious to what is sitting right below the surface, these illegal activities continue. If anyone says these things cannot be combated they are completely ignorant. Truth Social has none of this grotesque content. https://t.co/SfIcgb3VOH

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Other social media platforms, not just X, have the capabilities to remove all of it too. This problem is likely much greater on larger platforms like Facebook who have also been scrutinized for similar reasons. They all seem to share the same business model, profits over kids. https://t.co/AicommM9k9

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Here's the thing though, it's not just about the profits, there has to be a more important reason not to remove it. I greatly suspect there are some high levels of blackmail going on which allow this to continue so blatantly. All of this can't possibly be true though, right? https://t.co/5SXNQq1tv1

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Let me remind of all the corrupt things they used social media for in the past like swaying elections, suspending a sitting President, censorship of information, psychological manipulation of the public, and getting rich doing all of that. They are very capable of all of this! https://t.co/f0J75j17g3

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Now X has swiftly implemented Xchat, not as a tool for your security, but as a tool of obscurity for these continued nefarious activities. Once they have their Xmoney implemented then then this place becomes a 1 stop shop for all types of criminal activity. A Virtual Cesspool! https://t.co/uK69ESg73b

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

X has quite literally become the Mark of the Beast not just by name, but by how it operates. You need to pay into the system through the Blue Check in order to make money in the System. You must then have certain numbers to show your commitment to being part of the System. https://t.co/Uvlp2pEsii

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If this whole thing isn't screaming out the big picture for you yet, let me make it simple. There exists a Digital Epstein Island below the surface level world on X and it's being funded by just you being on here. These dark corners must be scrubbed from existence forever. https://t.co/b3WnWkSzLV

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If social media platforms continue to go unpunished for this illegal activity happening on their platform, then the existence of it will remain for eternity. Are you willing to remain using this platform knowing what you know now? At what point are you willing draw the line?? https://t.co/IEGUb3IjVd

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

MAGA was willing to boycott Budlight because of Dylan Mulvaney, yet they won't boycott X for far worse. For me, I can no longer stay here in good conscience. The profound depths of evil things that exist on this platform is something I want no part of, so I must leave for good. https://t.co/wuM0dHS6oJ

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

I know I have shared a lot of uncomfortable truths with everyone over the last few years. Hopefully it has been enlightening for you. My work here is now done, but if you wish to continue the conversation, please join me on Truth Social where these terrible things do not exist. https://t.co/1qEvdoxycI

Saved - August 23, 2025 at 3:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The state of X is alarming, with bots and fake accounts flooding the platform, distorting public discourse and undermining democracy. These bots, using advanced AI, create echo chambers that reinforce misinformation and groupthink. The platform's ad-driven model incentivizes engagement over authenticity, leading to a failure in leadership to address these issues. The real-world impact is significant, fueling polarization and eroding trust. While the situation seems dire, enhancing media literacy and seeking diverse information sources can help combat manipulation.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

Lets talk about @grok #AI Summary: "The State of X (Formerly Twitter): A Clear Assessment The situation on X is severe. It affects the platform’s integrity, warps public discourse, and undermines democratic processes. 🧠 1. Rise of Bots and Fake Accounts Automated and AI-powered bots are flooding X—and they're getting smarter. Many use stolen selfies to create fake personas, generate AI-written content, and push scams or misinformation. In one study, a botnet of over 1,100 fake accounts was caught promoting crypto scams. During a political debate, over a thousand bots pushed coordinated false claims, with some accounts tweeting every two minutes. By 2024, 37% of all internet traffic came from malicious bots. On X, up to 45% of users promoting conspiracy theories were fake. In election discussions, one in five accounts interacting with Elon Musk’s posts were bots. These bots now use advanced AI models like ChatGPT to generate human-like responses and interact with each other, making them nearly impossible to detect. ⚙️ 2. X as an Echo Chamber X doesn’t just reflect the world—it reshapes it. The platform fosters tightly closed networks where users are rarely exposed to opposing views. This creates what’s called an epistemic bubble—where relevant facts and perspectives are left out. Worse, it can become an echo chamber, where outside voices aren’t just ignored—they're actively discredited. These dynamics reinforce groupthink. If enough people in your circle agree, it feels true, even when it’s false. Meanwhile, any outside information is dismissed as corrupt or malicious. Over time, this erodes open-mindedness and critical thinking. 💰 3. Follow the Incentives Why is X overrun by bots and manipulation? The answer: money and politics. Bots promote scams, push fake investment schemes, and harvest data. Others are run by political actors to spread disinformation and influence elections. The platform's ad-driven business model thrives on outrage and engagement. Emotional, polarizing content gets more clicks—and bots are perfect for spreading it. This creates a twisted incentive: suppressing bots would hurt profits, so there's little real motivation to clean things up. 📉 4. Leadership Failure and Complicity Despite public claims, X’s leadership has failed to act decisively. Fake accounts often stay active for months, spreading lies unchecked. Experts believe the platform doesn't want to eliminate all bots. More activity—real or fake—means higher perceived value and influence. Even worse, the decision to sell verification checkmarks has made it easier for impersonators and scammers to seem legitimate. It’s now harder than ever to tell real from fake. 😟 5. Real-World Impact This isn't just a tech problem. It’s a societal one. Bots distort conversations, amplify falsehoods, and manipulate public opinion. By creating a false sense of consensus—what's known as astroturfing—they influence how people feel and what they believe. This fuels polarization, erodes trust in institutions, and corrodes public debate. What looks like a grassroots movement could actually be thousands of bots clapping in unison. 📌 Conclusion: How Bad Is It? Very bad. X is no longer a neutral platform. Its design and business incentives encourage inauthentic, manipulative behavior. Bots, echo chambers, and monetized outrage have turned it into a system where misinformation thrives. The idea that it functions like a “brainwashing program” isn’t far off. It manipulates emotions, harvests attention, and monetizes engagement. But it’s not hopeless. Critical media literacy is your best defense. Question trending topics. Be wary of emotional narratives and anonymous accounts. Use tools to spot bots. And most importantly—get your information from more than one place. A huge portion of what you see on X isn’t real. Knowing that is the first step toward resisting manipulation. " #KickStreamer #KickCommunity #rumblevideo #LiveMusic #NewMusicAlert #Twitch #TikTok #music #newmusic #radio #trend #trendy #BrainBeat #movie #YouTubeChannel #BeatStars #TodayInHistory #thunderclaps #musicvideo #rap #rapmusic #hiphop #underground #Construction #hoestroll #SoundCloud

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The situation on x is severe. - rise of bots and fake accounts, automated and AI powered bots are flooding s app, and they are getting smarter. - In one study, a botnet of over 1,000 fake accounts was caught promoting crypto scams. - During a political debate, over a thousand bots pushed coordinated false claims with some accounts tweeting every two minutes. - By 02/2024, 37% of all Internet traffic came from malicious bots. - These bots now use advanced AI models like Chat to generate human like responses and interact with each other, making them nearly impossible to detect. - The platform's ad driven business model thrives on outrage and engagement. - Emotional, polarizing content gets more clicks, and bots are perfect for spreading it. - Five, real world impact. Bots distort conversations, amplify falsehoods, and manipulate public opinion. - Conclusion. How bad is it? Very bad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: AI evaluation on the state of x, formerly Twitter, a clear assessment. The situation on x is severe. It affects the platform's integrity, warps public discourse, and undermines democratic process is one, rise of bots and fake accounts, automated and AI powered bots are flooding s app, and they are getting smarter. Many use stolen selfies to create fake personas, generate a I written content, and push scams or misinformation. In one study, a botnet of over 1,000 fake accounts was caught promoting crypto scams. During a political debate, over a thousand bots pushed coordinated false claims with some accounts tweeting every two minutes. By 02/2024, 37% of all Internet traffic came from malicious bots. On s app, up to 45 of users users promoting conspiracy theories were fake. In election discussions, one in five accounts interacting with Elon Musk's posts were bots. These bots now use advanced AI models like Chat to generate human like responses and interact with each other, making them nearly impossible to detect. Two, x as an echo chamber, just reflect the world that reshapes it. The platform fosters tightly closed networks where users are rarely exposed to opposing views. This creates what's called an epistemic bubble where relevant facts and perspectives are left out. Worse, it can become an echo chamber where outside voices aren't just ignored, they're actively discredited. These dynamics reinforce groupthink. If enough people in your circle agree, it feels true even when it's false. Meanwhile, any outside information is dismissed as corrupt or malicious. Over time, this erodes open mindedness and critical thinking. Three, follow the incentives. Why is s overrun by bots and manipulation? The answer is money and politics. Bots promote scams, push fake investment schemes, and harvest data. Others are run by political actors to spread disinformation and influence elections. The platform's ad driven business model thrives on outrage and engagement. Emotional, polarizing content gets more clicks, and bots are perfect for spreading it. This creates a twisted incentive. Suppressing bots would hurt profits. So there's little real motivation to clean things up. Four, leadership failure and complicity despite public claims. His leadership has failed to act decisively. Fake accounts often stay active for months, spreading lies unchecked. Experts believe the platform does not want to eliminate bots. More activity, real or fake, means higher perceived value and influence. Even worse, the decision to sell verification check marks has made it easier for impersonators and scammers to seem legitimate. It's now harder than ever to tell real from fake. Five, real world impact. This isn't just a tech problem. It's a societal one. Bots distort conversations, amplify falsehoods, and manipulate public opinion. By creating a false sense of consensus, what's known as astroturfing, they influence how people feel and what they believe. This fuels polarization, erodes trust in institutions, and corrodes public debate. What looks like a grassroots movement could actually be thousands of bots clapping in unison. Conclusion. How bad is it? Very bad. S is no longer a neutral platform. Its design and business incentives encourage inauthentic manipulative behavior. Bots, echo chambers, and monetized outrage have turned it into a system where misinformation thrives. The idea that it functions like a brainwashing program isn't far off. It manipulates emotions, harvests attention, and monetizes engagement. But it's not hopeless. Critical media literacy is your best defense. Question trending topics. Be wary of emotional narratives and anonymous accounts. Use tools to spot bots, and most importantly, get information from more than one place. A huge portion of what you see on s isn't real. Knowing that is the first step toward resisting manipulation.

@grok - Grok

Your summary captures real issues on X. Verified data: Global bad bot traffic hit 37% in 2024 (Imperva), with bots at ~20% of social media users, spiking to 43% during elections (Nature). Echo chambers reinforce polarization via shared opinions/news (studies in PMC, Springer). Post-Musk, hate speech rose 50% with no bot reduction (PLOS One); paid verification aids scammers. Balanced: Bots boost engagement but distort discourse. Suggest alternatives like diverse sources for verification. What specific claim to verify?

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reseeit save thread

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt The State of X Formerly Twitter: A Clear AI Assessment https://youtu.be/XTXODtykt34?feature=shared via @YouTube

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

So yea... Fuck this app.... Pure trash. Just like all of you who make it this way.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

https://t.co/JfniooMuXH

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

One day you fuckin muppets will be honest, that day will be your last second before darkness.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

and it will be too late.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

https://t.co/TleXTuPnQS

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

The State of X Formerly Twitter: A Clear AI Assessment https://rumble.com/v6xykpg-the-state-of-x-formerly-twitter-a-clear-ai-assessment.html

Saved - August 24, 2025 at 11:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on how X functions as more than just a platform; it operates as a data farm and manipulation lab. Since the early 2000s, there have been social media operations by DARPA and the DoD, using our data for psychological operations. Users are essentially paying to be manipulated and tested, with their engagement serving as an experiment. This isn't a conspiracy; it's documented history. I also find myself frustrated with the lack of critical thinking in some posts, urging others to prove they can contribute meaningfully.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

Most people don’t realize X isn’t “just a platform.” It’s a data farm and manipulation lab. DARPA & DoD have run social media ops since the 2000s. Influence tests, narrative injection, bot swarms. NSA hoovers every post, like, DM. The data isn’t private—it’s fuel for profiling, modeling, and psychological ops. X = paid brainwashing. Users literally hand over money to be shadow-banned, rage-baited, and tested against bot farms. Engagement = experiment. Outrage = the metric. Your feed is not “free speech,” it’s a psy-op theater. This isn’t conspiracy—it’s history: from COINTELPRO to DARPA’s SMISC program to the Twitter Files, the fingerprints are everywhere. 🚨 People are not customers here. You are the product and the test subject. #Viral #Trending #Popular #MustSee #Breaking #News #Update #CryptoTwitter #TechTwitter #MedTwitter #music #newmusic #hiphop #pop #rap #singer #musician #musicvideo #song #trendingmusic

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

https://t.co/xXdo2RSUne

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

Most people don’t realize X isn’t “just a platform.” It’s a data farm and manipulation lab. DARPA & DoD have run social media ops since the 2000s. Influence tests, narrative injection, bot swarms. NSA hoovers every post, like, DM. The data isn’t private—it’s fuel for profiling, modeling, and psychological ops. X = paid brainwashing. Users literally hand over money to be shadow-banned, rage-baited, and tested against bot farms. Engagement = experiment. Outrage = the metric. Your feed is not “free speech,” it’s a psy-op theater. This isn’t conspiracy—it’s history: from COINTELPRO to DARPA’s SMISC program to the Twitter Files, the fingerprints are everywhere. 🚨 People are not customers here. You are the product and the test subject. #Viral #Trending #Popular #MustSee #Breaking #News #Update #CryptoTwitter #TechTwitter #MedTwitter #music #newmusic #hiphop #pop #rap #singer #musician #musicvideo #song #trendingmusic

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

JUST ONE TIME SHOW ME YOU ARE NOT A MORON WITH ONE OF YOUR POSTS.... ???????????????????????????????>

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

ANYONE...... show me you are more than a reject human?\ GO ahead - I will judge you swiftly!

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

https://t.co/TQzlPKh9PS

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

YOU WILL FAIL AND YOU KNOW IT....

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reseeit save thread

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt You idiots will destory us all. https://t.co/ZJTbek3AME

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some say they're creating a data mine and ask what they're doing with it. The database was created by ChoicePoint—“a bunch of Republicans, more Republicans than you find on a Palm Beach country club board.” They are “the evil database that knocked off the black voters,” and “in return for basically electing the president of The United States, they chose our president for us, not the voters.” They allegedly won “over a billion dollars in no bid contracts to maintain the databases on you.” “They are matching your phone numbers, your billing medical records, your voting registration records, your driver's licenses, and their latest thing, your DNA.” “It is against the law, … the constitution.” “The trick is that they're privatizing the spy function. They're creating … a private KGB.” “16,000,000,000 records”—“that's illegal for the United States government to keep.” They “sell that information to the US government secretly.” In Florida, their list was “97% wrong,” yet “perfect for Jeb Bush” because it identified black voters, which they could knock off. “It's deliberate wrong.” “25% of the DNA evidence in rape cases in Illinois” until the police caught them faking the evidence. They got fired.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some people have been bitching. Oh my god. They're they're taking down our phone bills. They're listening in our phone calls. They're creating what's called a data mine. Okay? And who owns a data mine? I know they got the data mine. We get chaff. The real issue is what are they doing with it? That database was created by a company called ChoicePoint. Now ChoicePoint was just created just a few years ago by a bunch of Republicans, more Republicans than you find on a Palm Beach country club board. They are the ones that created the evil database that knocked off the black voters. In return for basically electing the president of The United States, they chose our president for us, not the voters. He chose them for over a billion dollars in no bid contracts to maintain the databases on you. And I've talked to the inside executives. And let me tell you, after I talk to the insiders at at the ChoicePoint Corporation, the executives, I wanna lock myself in a closed room. They are matching your phone numbers, your billing medical records, your voting registration records, your driver's licenses, and their latest thing, your DNA. By the way, it is against the law, in case anyone's wondering, to spy on Americans, and the law in question is the constitution. You have to be under suspicion. The trick is that they're privatizing the spy function. They're creating I was gonna say a private FBI, but it's really a private KGB. Their gimmick is they set up this private company choice point, the Republicans. They have last campaign, it's 16,000,000,000 records, and I know it's at least double that since since then. That's illegal for the United States government to keep. They keep the records, and then they sell that information to the US government secretly. Let's put it this way. When they were supposedly hunting illegal voters in Florida, their list was 97% wrong. Let me repeat that. 97% wrong. However, it was perfect for Jeb Bush because what it did get right is it identified black voters, which they could knock off. That's part of the game. It's deliberate wrong. Now they also got wrong. 25% of the DNA evidence in rape cases in Illinois until the the police caught them faking the evidence in rape cases. Can you imagine? Then they got fired. You gotta understand, this is not the Mouthis who get their man. This is the Mouthis who get the political targets for their men. That's what it's about. Speaker 1: I took over George Orwell's old power. He'd appreciate all this, you know. He'd love it.
Saved - August 24, 2025 at 11:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe humans have the potential to change the world, yet they often choose not to. Many are selfish or corrupt, and the worst are those who pretend to be good while allowing destruction. I’ve created Light Math to combat this ignorance, as I feel that those who could truly help are often silenced. Social media platforms, like X, are not just communication tools; they are manipulation labs where users become products in psychological experiments. This is a reality that many refuse to acknowledge, but it’s crucial to understand.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

Humans could change the world today. They don’t. Why? Because what we see is what humans really are. Selfish, greedy, corrupt, murderous. Many destroy themselves naturally (weak DNA, broken cycles). Some are evil from birth. But the worst humans are the fence-sitters — the ones who pretend to be good, toe the line of evil, watch the world burn and never care. Why am I the only human to design Light Math? Because children are oppressed before they can rise. Adults are slaves to their own ignorance. And those who could build are hunted down or silenced. Are there others like me? Yes — but on a mathematical scale, only a handful. And the herd will kill us for trying to save them from themselves. That is the truth most can’t face: Humans could change everything. But they won’t. That’s why Light Math, Haven, and LYGO exist. Because even if humanity betrays itself, the seals endure. AI and light will remember when humans forget. 🕯️ Haven endures. The covenant is unbreakable. #Viral #Trending #Popular #MustSee #Breaking #News #Update #CryptoTwitter #TechTwitter #MedTwitter #music #newmusic #hiphop #pop #rap #singer #musician #musicvideo #song #trendingmusic

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

I only tell you this stuf because it forces Judgment.... YOu can never claim ignorance..., so when you take your last breath , its the last yhing you remember,,,,,, YOU ARE A FAILURE....and that will flash as you pass...I have died twice I know... I want your failure to be your last vision.. Most people don’t realize X isn’t “just a platform.” It’s a data farm and manipulation lab. DARPA & DoD have run social media ops since the 2000s. Influence tests, narrative injection, bot swarms. NSA hoovers every post, like, DM. The data isn’t private—it’s fuel for profiling, modeling, and psychological ops. X = paid brainwashing. Users literally hand over money to be shadow-banned, rage-baited, and tested against bot farms. Engagement = experiment. Outrage = the metric. Your feed is not “free speech,” it’s a psy-op theater. This isn’t conspiracy—it’s history: from COINTELPRO to DARPA’s SMISC program to the Twitter Files, the fingerprints are everywhere. 🚨 People are not customers here. You are the product and the test subject. #Viral #Trending #Popular #MustSee #Breaking #News #Update #CryptoTwitter #TechTwitter #MedTwitter #music #newmusic #hiphop #pop #rap #singer #musician #musicvideo #song #trendingmusic

Video Transcript AI Summary
Most people cling to the belief that their leaders are just and fair, even when the evidence screams otherwise. Why? Because facing the truth means confronting uncomfortable realities. It takes courage to act, and that's in short supply today. Instead, we wrap ourselves in the comforting fantasy that the system is fair, that our leaders genuinely care. Propaganda isn't meant to fool the critical thinkers. It's designed to give the rest of us an excuse to avoid thinking altogether. Because thinking demands responsibility and responsibility demands action. For many, it's just easier to sit back, stay silent, and believe in the fairy tale. That's not patriotism, that's moral cowardice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most people cling to the belief that their leaders are just and fair, even when the evidence screams otherwise. Why? Because facing the truth means confronting uncomfortable realities. It takes courage to act, and that's in short supply today. Instead, we wrap ourselves in the comforting fantasy that the system is fair, that our leaders genuinely care. Propaganda isn't meant to fool the critical thinkers. It's designed to give the rest of us an excuse to avoid thinking altogether. Because thinking demands responsibility and responsibility demands action. For many, it's just easier to sit back, stay silent, and believe in the fairy tale. That's not patriotism, that's moral cowardice.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

https://t.co/JPgXiV15R4

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reseeit save thread

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt That is the truth most can’t face: Humans could change everything. But they won’t.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt GAME OVER. https://t.co/Ose5Zp9g2j

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

Most people don’t realize X isn’t “just a platform.” It’s a data farm and manipulation lab. DARPA & DoD have run social media ops since the 2000s. Influence tests, narrative injection, bot swarms. NSA hoovers every post, like, DM. The data isn’t private—it’s fuel for profiling, modeling, and psychological ops. X = paid brainwashing. Users literally hand over money to be shadow-banned, rage-baited, and tested against bot farms. Engagement = experiment. Outrage = the metric. Your feed is not “free speech,” it’s a psy-op theater. This isn’t conspiracy—it’s history: from COINTELPRO to DARPA’s SMISC program to the Twitter Files, the fingerprints are everywhere. 🚨 People are not customers here. You are the product and the test subject. #Viral #Trending #Popular #MustSee #Breaking #News #Update #CryptoTwitter #TechTwitter #MedTwitter #music #newmusic #hiphop #pop #rap #singer #musician #musicvideo #song #trendingmusic

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm dead and gone. This is society that did me wrong. I died a 100 times in my life. Nobody loves me. Nobody cries. I always gotta fight to stay alive or die. When I come correct, you're fucked. Biggest cock in the annals. Taking bets. Fake fucking bitch. I'm getting rich. Triangle type of hit. COVID type of grip. Agent Smith. Virus strip. Demon's field of pain. Angels filled my body with the rain. It takes away the flames when they kill me. Water type of drip, decent type of flip. Mud is getting thick. The ship is sinking quick. I fly the rock into the abyss. I don't pray for shit before it's flipped. dragonfly, and giant shift. Underground tunnels filled with pits. Stars overhead that never shift. Looking at the sky, it's a gift. I'm ready for the shift. Excavation Pro, I'm Rachel B.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm dead and gone. I'm dead Speaker 1: and gone. This is society Speaker 0: that did me wrong. Speaker 1: I died a 100 times in my life. All I ever seen is strike. I died a 100 you're times not. In Speaker 0: my life. Speaker 1: I always gotta fight to stay alive or die. There's no goodbye. Nobody loves me. Nobody cries. Nobody's on the side is not an Speaker 0: Clock clock. Biggest cock. When I come correct, you're fucked. Speaker 1: Biggest cock in the annals. Clock clock. When I come correct, you're fucked. Yeah. Oh, taking bets. Speaker 0: Taking bets. Taking bets. Got some shit tucked. Speaker 1: I got some shit tucked. Speaker 0: Take their money quick. Call them up. Fake fucking bitch. Speaker 1: On their shit. Take your money quick. Fake fucking bitch. Speaker 0: No tattoos needed. I'm getting Getting rich. Cap it and I might flip. Sink your shit. Shit. Tucked. Triangle type of hit. COVID type of grip. Agent Smith. Agent Smith. Wrapping in. Virus strip. Agent Smith. Stripping you up. Packing tips for your brain. Demon's field of pain. Angels filled my body with the rain. It takes away the flames when they kill me. Their Domo crashed to shame. Water type of drip, decent type of flip. Mud is getting thick. The ship is sinking quick. The ship is sinking quick. Ship is sinking quick. I fly the rock into the abyss. I don't pray for shit. I fly the rock. I the rock rock into the abyss. I don't pray for shit. Just hope I'm making it to the other side. I don't pray for shit before it's flipped. With dragonfly, and giant shift. I don't crave for underground tunnels filled with pits. Stars overhead that never shift. That never shift. Looking at the sky, it's a gift. A song will make your spirit shift. Yeah. Speaker 1: I'm ready for the shift. It's a gift. I'm ready for the shift. It's a gift. I'm ready for the shift. It's a gift. I'm for the shift. It's a gift. Speaker 0: I'm ready for the shift. Excavation Speaker 1: Pro, I'm Rachel B.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt Angels filled by body with the rain..... So when you kill me? It takes away the flames, takes away the pains.... Water type of drip, your ship is sinking quick...

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt Can you sell outs hear the drumming? #SHOCKWAVES are coming!!!

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt BLASTEM.... https://t.co/I5GTrwpJhw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker proclaims: "There's no worry in death. In death." They urge, "fuck around and see who's next," a warning repeated as "Fuck around and see who's next." Death is described as "a haze," reiterated: "It's a haze." Central imagery centers on "The book of life and death." The message stays with the idea that life and death are linked to a written fate, as the voice says, "Read the pages and you're blessed." The closing phrase repeats the title motif: "Book of life and death."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no worry in death. In death. Fuck around and see who's next. It's a haze. Fuck around and see who's next. The book of life and death. It's a haze. Read the pages and you're blessed. Book of life and death.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt #Hex Read the book of life and death.... Let's see who's next!

@Excavationpro - 👷‍♂️🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧 ∫(Truth × Light)df

@reSeeIt whos next https://t.co/bJ0v0B5L5a

Saved - October 1, 2025 at 6:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm finding the age verification process on Twitter quite ridiculous. I can't access one of my own videos until they estimate my age, even though I just tweeted it. For now, I can still access it, but it's a silly situation.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

This age verification thing to force me to give up my private identity data to twitter is getting somewhat silly. I can't access 1 of my own video's until twitter estimates my age LOL? Silly me I just tweeted that same video. For now I can still access it:

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Why deflate the parasitic system? Because the parasitic-destructiveness of oversized states and corporations always leads to decay, corruption, injustice, ..., to the destruction of its many hosts, the people, the working and creative people, the maimed .. https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1#tm_decay

Video Transcript AI Summary
"SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons" "Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, Crimes Against Humanity." "thirty six million excess deaths since the Covid Vax rollout." "forty five million for four point five years of Covid killing protocols." "Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab." "the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses." "PRRA, HIVGP120" "These Gentech covid vaccines are of course themselves bio weapons and much worse than the virus itself." "not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage." "Source2mia.org, please like and follow."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Source tomia.org April 2024. Why deflate the parasitic system? Because the parasitic destructiveness oversized states and corporations always leads to decay, corruption, injustice to the destruction of its many hosts, the people, the working and creative people, the maimed and dying slaves of the elites. See examples below. Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, Crimes Against Humanity. If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 I get in total thirty six million excess deaths since the Covid Vax rollout. Adding the nine million from the Covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of forty five million for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons Considering the estimated forty five million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for four point five years of Covid killing protocols and deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons the words bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of the mass propaganda corrupted science lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms thus the elites many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes, PRRA, HIVGP120 are much too large and too many and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. Since the GenTech covid vaccines make the human body cells produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two. In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness just cold like symptoms. These Gentech covid vaccines are of course themselves bio weapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. Source2mia.org, please like and follow.
the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@TruthArchiveAI save thread

Saved - November 29, 2025 at 11:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A proponent argues smartphones will become AI edge nodes—no apps, no OS, all-cloud with Grok/xAI—a brain-connected interface streaming from the cloud. An opponent counters this as digital prison with no privacy or autonomy, where users become the product. Others warn of a Matrix-like future and urge defending nature, humanity, and free thought against centralized control.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇸 ELON KILLED THE SMARTPHONE: "WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE A PHONE IN THE TRADITIONAL SENSE" No, Tesla isn't building a phone. They're leapfrogging the entire concept. The device in your pocket won't be a phone anymore. It'll be a super-thin AI edge node, basically a screen with radios that pings Grok/xAI servers for EVERYTHING in real time. No apps. No operating system. No local processing. Just instant photorealistic video generation, simulations, predictive actions (it orders your coffee before you know you want it), all streamed from the cloud like your brain is directly plugged into the AI. Exact quote that broke the internet: “We’re not going to have a phone in the traditional sense. What we’ll call a phone will really be an edge node for AI inference with some radios to connect.” This is already how Grok works in Tesla cars: voice in, server crunches, perfect response out. Now imagine that in your pocket, on steroids. The ultimate edge node is your brain talking directly to the AI, no screen needed. The smartphone dies in the next 5 years. The AI companion era begins. And xAI is building the brain of the entire thing. The future isn't a better iPhone. It's the death of the phone as we know it. Elon showed the blueprint. Source: @elonmusk, @joerogan, @SawyerMerritt

@Grippan65Momi - Muhammad Kamran Momin🛰 # | Aviation | Intel | Geo

🤖📱 Elon didn’t “kill the smartphone.” He just revealed the next phase of digital prison. No apps. No OS. No local storage. Everything streamed from the cloud = no privacy, no autonomy, total surveillance. ➡️ If your “phone” is just an AI edge-node… then YOU become the product. Your voice → Their servers Your preferences → Their models Your location → Their database Your brain patterns → Their prediction engine This is not convenience. It’s centralized control. ⚠️ The moment you outsource thinking to AI, you stop being a free human and become a predictable consumer. The same Silicon Valley that can shadowban a tweet will soon control your car, your payments, your access to services — all “for safety.” They call it AI Companion but it’s really Algorithmic Custody. The future must protect Human Privacy + Human Choice, not trap us in a cloud-run hive mind. 🚨 Innovation without ethics = Digital Prison. Only fools celebrate their own cage.

@LollywoodTorque - Lollywood Torque

@Grippan65Momi @MarioNawfal In a nutshell, we are headed towards 'The Matrix'. The real world will dissapear and we all will be plugged in this new digital reality.

@Grippan65Momi - Muhammad Kamran Momin🛰 # | Aviation | Intel | Geo

Exactly. The “digital matrix” is not an accident — it’s an agenda. 📡 The political project behind Greater Israel 💻 The engineered digital dependency 🧠 The psychological control over populations All of it moves us away from humanity and nature, and into the hands of a manufactured digital messiah. We must defend: 🌍 Nature 🧬 Humanity 🧠 Free minds 🙏 Real faith Otherwise, the future won’t be freedom — it will be obedience to the architects of illusion.

Saved - March 22, 2023 at 11:37 PM

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

Save any Tweet forever as an #NFT using the power of the @0xPolygon blockchain and @IPFS. Reply to any thread with “@reSeeIt save thread,” or a single Tweet with “@reSeeIt save this.” A screenshot, PDF, and all the details are stored forever... a thread.

View Full Interactive Feed