TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

JamesOKeefeIII
Posted - February 17, 2021 at 2:17 AM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 11:37 PM

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

Facebook is more powerful than the United States Supreme Court #ExposeFacebook https://t.co/OxRzlW7JWj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Facebook announced it is expanding its efforts to remove false claims about COVID-19 vaccines, specifically claims that the vaccines change people's DNA. However, a leaked tape reveals Zuckerberg expressing caution about the vaccines, stating "we just don't know the long term side effects of basically modifying people's DNA and RNA." This statement seemingly violates Facebook's own policy. Zuckerberg later stated that his "understanding is that these vaccines do not modify your DNA or RNA," which contradicts his earlier statement. DNA is inherent, so anything foreign will ultimately get cleared. It's interesting that Zuckerberg can change his opinion, but Facebook users cannot do the same. What happened to free speech? Zuckerberg is betraying what Facebook ought to stand for.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We just don't know the long term side effects of of basically modifying people's, DNA and RNA. Speaker 1: DNA is inherent in your own nuclear cell. Speaker 0: We just don't know the long term side effects of of basically modifying people. Speaker 2: Last week, Facebook announced they are, quote, expanding their efforts to remove false claims on Facebook and Instagram about COVID-nineteen vaccines. Let's take a look at Facebook's most updated COVID-nineteen vaccine policy. The real kicker is right here on the policy where Facebook says it would remove any content that quote, claims the COVID nineteen vaccine changes people's DNA. Well, we just got a new leaked tape from Zuckerberg himself, the CEO of Facebook, basically violating his own code of conduct. He would be censored on the platform today for what he said. Speaker 0: I share some caution on this because, we just don't know the long term side effects of of basically modifying people's, DNA and RNA. Speaker 2: So when Zuckerberg said, quote, basically, the vaccine is modifying people's DNA, it seems pretty clear modifying is synonymous with changing. Again, Zuckerberg would be banned from Facebook for saying this. This video of me showing the CEO of Facebook talking might be banned, but then Zuckerberg on November 30 in a public livestream q and a appears to somewhat change his tune. Speaker 0: And my understanding is that these vaccines do not modify your DNA or or RNA. Speaker 1: No. First of all, DNA is inherent in your own nuclear cell. Sticking in anything foreign will ultimately get cleared. Speaker 0: Well, I'm glad we we can we can clear that up. Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm glad we could clear that up. Isn't it interesting that Zuckerberg can vastly involve his thinking on the subject of vaccines? As soon as he's made up his mind or appears to have made up his mind on the topic, he disallows the almost 3,000,000,000 Facebook users to do the same. Rules for thee, but not for me. Seems a little bit hypocritical, don't you think? What happened to free speech? And who is on this Facebook oversight board? Who makes all their policy decisions? It's not that the insider is betraying Mark Zuckerberg. It's that Mark Zuckerberg is betraying what Facebook ought to stand for. We would know none of this, but not for the fact that we have a brave Facebook insider. Be brave. Do something.
Project_Veritas
Posted - February 3, 2023 at 8:21 PM
Saved - August 24, 2025 at 10:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just found out that Facebook and Instagram removed our video where we confronted the YouTube VP of Trust & Safety, claiming it violated their privacy standards. They've even threatened to restrict and disable our accounts. Here's the video they took down.

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

BREAKING: @Facebook and @Instagram have just REMOVED our video confronting @YouTube VP of Trust & Safety saying it was a violation of “Community Standards” on “Privacy” and have threatened to restrict and disable our accounts https://t.co/WIUBD32tEf

@Project_Veritas - Project Veritas

Here is the video they removed https://t.co/ktvXRJawN2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas, asks Matt Halperin, YouTube’s global head of trust and safety, why they banned our Pfizer director video about mutating viruses. The tape includes: 'Don't tell anyone what this is. We gotta publish your time. We gotta publish your own time.' 'Right? How much is Pfizer paying you to run cover for them? Is YouTube brought to us by Pfizer?' He states: 'Matt, millions of people are gonna see this videotape, and they're gonna see your cowardice.' 'YouTube just took down our Pfizer expose. YouTube gave us a strike and will not let us post for a week.' The confrontation continues: 'Is the is the global head of trust and safety threatening me?' It ends with: 'Matt Halperin, global head of trust and safety brought to you by Pfizer. Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas.' 'You touched me. That's not something you wanna do.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Matt? Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas. Why did you ban our videotape of a Pfizer director talking about mutating viruses? Speaker 1: Don't tell anyone what this is. We gotta publish your time. We gotta publish your own time. Speaker 2: We're restoring, like, no you know Speaker 1: how the virus keeps mutating? Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate ourselves so we can put the we can create unequally developing vaccines. Speaker 0: Right? How much is Pfizer paying you to run cover for them? Is YouTube brought to us by Pfizer? Matt, you're the global head of trust and safety at YouTube. Why don't you trust the public with a matter that absolutely concerns their safety? Matt, millions of people are gonna see this videotape, and they're gonna see your cowardice. They're going to see your absolute contempt for the public trust, and they're gonna see your absolute disregard for public safety. Are you sure this is how you wish to portray yourself? Matt, be brave. Say something. How much ad revenue does YouTube take in from Pfizer? How much was at stake? A Pfizer director talking about mutating viruses. Speaker 2: I'm like, no. You know how Speaker 1: the virus keeps mutating? Why don't we just mutate it ourselves? Speaker 0: And you don't want the American public or the world to know about it. YouTube just took down our Pfizer expose. YouTube gave us a strike and will not let us post for a week. Why not? Do you have any ethical responsibility to the American people, to the world? Why does the public not deserve to see that videotape? Speaker 3: You touched me. That's not something you wanna do. Speaker 0: Is that a threat? Are you threatening me? Is the is the global head of trust and safety threatening me? Speaker 3: No. I said I'd call the police if you you accost me. Speaker 0: Why? I'm I I didn't touch you, Matt. Speaker 3: Yes, you did. Speaker 0: Matt Halperin, global head of trust and safety brought to you by Pfizer. Christian Hartsock, Project Veritas.
tracybeanz
Posted - September 9, 2023 at 2:20 PM
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 12:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a monumental civil rights case, a district court ruled in favor of plaintiffs who alleged that the government coerced social media companies to censor speech. The court affirmed that the White House, Surgeon General, CDC, and FBI were guilty of pressuring platforms to remove posts and change moderation policies. The government's threats and interference were deemed unconstitutional. The court recognized ongoing harm and self-censorship caused by the government's actions. The ruling sets a precedent for addressing social media censorship in a court of law. The case will proceed to trial with broader discovery.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This case was filed last May by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with private plaintiffs, against numerous agencies in the federal government. Plaintiffs alleged that the government (including the FBI, White House, Surgeon General, CISA, among many others) were forcing social media companies to censor speech by threat.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This case was filed last May by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with private plaintiffs, against numerous agencies in the federal government. Plaintiffs alleged that the government (including the FBI, White House, Surgeon General, CISA, among many others) were forcing social media companies to censor speech by threat.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The Plaintiffs wanted a temporary injunction to STOP this activity as their case moved to trial. Judge Terry Doughty granted them expedited limited discovery and deposition to get the information they needed to prove a temporary injunction was warranted.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Of course, the government fought this the entire way, but ultimately were widely unsuccessful. The information plaintiffs received was absolutely mind blowing. For certain the government was coercing social media companies to censorship— the discovery proved that beyond a shadow of a doubt.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

It came time for a hearing on the injunction, and I traveled to Louisiana for that hearing. It was 8 hours long, and absolutely damning for the government. If you see the post I placed in the first post in this thread, you can scroll down and read all about it.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Since that hearing, I have been honored to do several spaces with @ThaWoodChipper, who also understands the importance of this monumental civil rights case. It is the most important civil rights case in the modern era, hands down. We waited patiently for the ruling… And on July 4th, we got it.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

On July 4th, the district court under an absolutely AMAZING judge in Terry Doughty, ruled in FAVOR of the Plaintiffs. Here is where you need to pay attention. Everything this judge wrote in his ruling is a PROVEN FACT in a court of law. In a 155 page ruling, the judge METICULOUSLY dissected the record and rendered a judgement.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I threaded this ruling when it happened, and you can find it on my “highlights” page - but I want to make something clear; the fact set the judge is relying on here came from EXTREMELY limited discovery and deposition from ONLY the government Defendants.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

So, the ruling was for a temporary injunction to STOP the government from the following while carving out some exceptions for them, AS THE REST OF THE CASE PROGRESSED THROUGH DISCOVERY AND TO TRIAL. Read this very carefully.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This list is going to be very important as we move forward through this thread, so please bookmark this for reference moving forward. So, the government obviously appealed this to the 5th circuit. The court heard the appeal in an expedited fashion (for them) and yesterday, THEIR opinion was filed.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

It is hard to completely rehash all of the reporting I have done over the past year and some months in a short update, but basically the government argued that they weren’t threatening anyone ever and everything we got in discovery was nonsense and misinterpreted, and the 3 judge panel of the court of appeals had to listen to that, while reviewing the DETAILED fact set the judge had ruled on in the order for the injunction.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

So, quickly, what we are about to go through is the 5th circuits decision on whether or not to UPHOLD the ruling that Judge Doughty made barring the government agencies listed from the actions listed above in the 4 set screenshot, or to REVERSE that ruling. It isn’t about the entire case— ONLY the temporary injunction.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I am probably 70/30 on how this panned out, but the details are important. The government asked that if the court should rule against them, they put a stay (pause) on the order for 10 days so that they could appeal it to the SCOTUS. The 5th did that, so the ruling they just laid down is PAUSED for 10 more days while the government attempts to write to the SCOTUS convincing them that they SHOULD be able to force social media companies to censor you. Chew on that for a minute.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Also, in the interim while we waited for this decision, I had the honor of interviewing both @AGAndrewBailey from Missouri, and @AGJeffLandry from Louisiana. Both are WONDERFUL examples of what you want in a state Attorney General. For links, see: Andrew Bailey: https://rumble.com/v342ndn-dark-to-light-missouri-attorney-general-andrew-bailey.html Jeff Landry: https://rumble.com/v36i7oh-dark-to-light-missouri-v.-biden-and-ag-jeff-landry.html

Dark to Light: Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey Today's show is information packed. We start with a dissection of the new indictments against President Trump, and we move into the Missouri v. Biden case, which sadly dovetails with the indictments. rumble.com
Dark to Light: Missouri v. Biden and AG Jeff Landry Get your Gold IRA FREE investor guide today! Click below: https://www.patriotgoldgroup.com/download/ira-investor-guide-cp.html We had a REALLY great show today, starting off with a touching song and a rumble.com

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

@AGAndrewBailey @AGJeffLandry We are about to travel through 74 pages together.. Grab coffee, whatever, and off we go. Here is the link to the decision, and here is a summary of what we are about to dissect as best we can. LINK: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca5.214640/gov.uscourts.ca5.214640.238.1.pdf

Published Opinion – #238, Att. #1 in State of Missouri v. Biden (5th Cir., 23-30445) – CourtListener.com PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [23-30445 Affirmed in Part] Judge: EBC, Judge: JWE, Judge: DRW. Mandate issue date is 10/31/2023; denying Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellants Mr. Xavier Becerra, Mr. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Mr. Vivek H. Murthy, Department of Health & Human Services and Mr. Anthony Fauci [11] [23-30445] (CCR) [Entered: 09/08/2023 04:36 PM] courtlistener.com

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

So, the court agrees the government is guilty of what is alleged, but not for ALL of the officials that Judge Doughty did. Remember, everything is based on the limited discovery they were able to receive, but I wholeheartedly disagree with this, and we will go through the reasons why. Still, the fact this was affirmed AT ALL is a massive, massive win.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

@AGAndrewBailey @AGJeffLandry They summarized much more concisely than I ever could… https://t.co/mOVcbQlst9

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

1. The White House and Surgeon General - taken together Here the appeals court affirms that the WH and SG requested social media companies remove posts and pressured them to do so. It also affirms that they also monitored the platforms moderation activities, demanded information from them about their policies, “Always, the officials asked for more data and stronger interventions” said the 5th.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

From the beginning the platforms cooperated - even creating special tools, but as officials began to demand more from them, the platforms worked to “appease” government officials, “eager” to stay in their good graces. https://t.co/JRstpgWUIH

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Remember, everything in this decision REAFFIRMS a fact pattern. Here the 5th affirms that the WH and SG attempted to interfere with the platforms own POLICY creation. This is so important. The government can not do this. https://t.co/Xs82GI5HzO

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Here the court affirms that platforms changed their moderation policy after instruction from the government… Tsk Tsk “…they also changed their moderation policies expressly in accordance with the officials’ wishes…” https://t.co/k1bN5Pxz11

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

As an aside, I don’t want to hear ONE PERSON come at any of us who have been saying this for years and say it is “misinformation” any longer. This is now affirmed both in congress and in two courts - a district court and the court of appeals of the United States. @krassenstein and @EdKrassen argued with me in a space once that this is all totally untrue. I hope they will revise their positions. I wont hold my breath.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The discovery proved that the changes many of the platforms enacted coincided closely with meeting between the WH and SG and the platforms. And even when they didn’t adopt the changes, they censored content that DID NOT BREAK their terms of service after that content was flagged by the government.. Again, marinate on it…

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

@krassenstein At the same time as they were demoting normal Americans, the social media platforms capitulated to government demands to “amplify” (inorganically) the governments “approved” narrative, specifically in this case when it pertained to vaccines for COVID. https://t.co/asT2LPmGow

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I want everyone to think about the above for a moment. They were forcing inorganic amplification so people would be fooled into thinking the vaccine was “safe and effective” when one of them was REMOVED because it wasn’t. The sheer evil behind the obvious is unbelievable.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Even with all of that, the ministry of truth wasn’t happy, scolding platforms for not doing enough, and trying to coerce them to do more. All of this to get that needle in your arm, consequences be damned… https://t.co/u1Ws27lq1M

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And here the court details the infamous press conference, where Jen Psaki and Vivek Murthy *expressly threatened* the platforms from the bully pulpit, even singling out certain accounts.. This was the ultimate in authoritarianism, and the 5th circuit agrees. https://t.co/pfuKR2Dl6a

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

“The platforms responded with total compliance. Their answer was four-fold.” The social media companies responded with child like obedience to daddy government. You can’t make this up. https://t.co/7KdEbIZtoF

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

They changed their internal policies in response to the presser… https://t.co/6mUxhGE6FP

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

They removed speakers (like the so called “disinfo dozen” that they HAD NOT BEEN targeting BEFORE the press conference, and they continued to inorganically amplify the government’s content. https://t.co/CoBxeDgV0A

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Even this wasn’t enough for the ministry of truth. They continued their public threats, invoking Section 230 protection as a cudgel for MORE action, and using the office of the President as a backbone for that threat. https://t.co/lSVh0dUC71

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

“Next, we turn to the CDC” says the 5th panel. They behaved much like the White House and Surgeon General. They flagged posts with supposed “misinformation” and actively sought to promote its “official” position over others. They also provided direct guidance to the platforms on the application of their internal policy and moderation activities.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

They had BOLO (Be on the Lookout) meetings on “misinformation” hot topics. They asked for moderation changes, and they OUTRIGHT DIRECTED platforms to take certain actions. Direct violation of the constitution. Platforms began relying on the CDC to “Debunk” posts it wasn’t sure about.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And now, the good ol’ FBI. They regularly met with platforms, at least since the 2020 election. They shared “Strategic information” to alert them to “misinformation” trends in the lead up to the elections. https://t.co/yvtGq79TMf

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Per their operations, the FBI monitored platforms moderation policies and asked for “detailed assessments” during regular meetings. Some platforms changed their TOS to be able to comply with the FBI. While the government boasted that *only* 50% of the domestic (I repeat - DOMESTIC) content they wanted to remove was removed, the court didn’t find that so beneficial for them.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This is going to be the part where my disappointment comes in…But, again, this isn’t the CASE decision, its the decision on the injunction only.. They talk about NIAID, CISA, and the State Department. NIAID and Fauci didn’t have regular contact with platforms or flag, they mainly appeared on Live Streams and podcasts and had those amplified. CISA and the SD directly engaged with the platforms and discussed the tools and techniques that foreign influence actors would use.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The State Department didn’t flag content, but CISA did, acting as an intermediary for third party groups and then “switch boarding” based off of the EIP and CIS. The officials actions “apparently led to content being removed or demoted by the recipient platforms” https://t.co/KuNQmkYwuW

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Relying on the fact set above, the district court concluded that the officials coerced platforms to remove content and change their moderation policies, and therefore were likely to succeed on the merits, granting the injunction. https://t.co/3vpLFQuWg7

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

LEGAL THEORY: On standing - Any ONE plaintiff that demonstrates ongoing harm or continued injury is enough to pass the standing argument, a fact that was argued eloquently by the Plaintiff attorney in court. https://t.co/1CGDLZqSRK

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The government is arguing that Plaintiffs dont have standing because they can’t prove a FUTURE injury. Here the court goes over their PAST injury. But the court doesn’t agree with the government. They believe there is ongoing injury and there will be future injury as well. https://t.co/Gfmm96ScvQ

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I want to stop for a second (again) and go over how monumental this actually is. This is the first time ever that a normal “user” or American has submitted evidence of social media censorship and had their concerns ADDRESSED at all by a COURT OF LAW.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Another HUGE precedent set here - the past chilling of their speech has caused individuals to SELF CENSOR. That is considered ongoing harm. This is a massive and very important section. https://t.co/vfa8NBIywk

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

“As the Supreme Court has recognized, this chilling of the Individual Plaintiffs exercise of their First Amendment Rights, is, itself, a constitutionally sufficient injury.” They rule that the fears motivating the self censorship aren’t hypothetical, and come from very real censorship injuries they have previously suffered… Legal Eagles, affirm for me the importance of JUST this paragraph.. Amazing.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The government had tried to argue that ongoing harms were not going to occur because, for example, Twitter had “stopped” enforcing its COVID misinformation policy. But the court disagrees, saying that they have been censored for views well beyond COVID. Continued next— very important.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Here is something ANYONE who is considering any sort of lawsuit needs to consider. The court here aptly notes that plaintiffs aren’t suing the platforms over their TOS, they are suing to stop the GOVERNMENT from interfering with platforms. Also - the government admitted in oral argument that they are STILL in contact with these platforms today. TLDR; the court doesn’t trust that the government isn’t still forcing social media companies to censor..

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This is GRAND. The government argued that because the users had been REINSTATED, all is well. The court rightly says no. The fact that they WERE REINSTATED is what causes the threat of ongoing harm. If they didn’t have an account, they wouldn’t have to worry about censorship— they wouldn’t be able to post. Masterful.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The first standing hurdle, crossed and landed for Plaintiffs. This means any chance of appeal on standing to SCOTUS is likely a failure. The government had argued this standing issue over, and over, and over and have been shot down every single time. Now that is reinforced yet again. This case isn’t going ANYWHERE.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The Plaintiffs had to show that their injuries were traceable to conduct of the government. Government argued that since the content moderation policies were in place in the Trump administration, and also because moderation decisions were made independently by the social media companies. They had no standing. However, the plaintiffs aren’t challenging the policies themselves, but whether they can be traced back to government actors. The appeals court agrees with the district court that yes, they can be.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Even though there were instances where social media companies declined to censor, the Plaintiffs only have to show the likelihood they would comply, not certainty. The logical conclusion is that they would, based on the preliminary discovery they received.. https://t.co/iBBr8Z4vGw

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And I want to again stress, this was LIMITED discovery. The judge in the district court had made it a point in an order to let the government know that this was a mere scintilla of what would be required for production moving forward. So position this for yourselves - all of this is coming from an EXTREMELY limited production of evidence, which will now broaden to include more officials, more agency heads, more PRIVATE companies, like Facebook, Google, and X, that will be subpoenaed and deposed for evidence at trial.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Next on standing, the Plaintiffs had to prove that their injuries could be redressed by a favorable decision on the injunction. https://t.co/yr5tIK2Usd

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Again, key here is that the Plaintiffs aren’t challenging the social media companies policies themselves, rather they asked for the government from being restrained from unlawfully interfering with their independent application of those policies. https://t.co/kut8vbUl2L

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And IMPORTANTLY, the government had argued that the state plaintiffs didn’t have standing. That goes right down the trash shoot here, and it is a BIG deal. States were censored by platforms. This court determines they have standing as well. https://t.co/CSJYbS0iVE

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And an interesting little tidbit here. Other state officials have experienced censorship as well, so this isn’t limited to just Missouri and Louisiana. https://t.co/lLRibdfomG

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And next, a very important part of the 1st Amendment that often goes undiscussed. THE RIGHT TO LISTEN. Constituent plaintiffs were harmed by the censorship of their elected representatives, and the elected representatives and states are harmed WHEN THEY CAN NOT HEAR their constituents. This was discussed at length in my interview with @AGJeffLandry

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The appeals court rules that Plaintiffs have standing - finally putting that issue to bed (hopefully) and also the court makes sure to include that even the CDC admitted the need to “hear” citizens. It may be for a different reason for them, but if you think about it - if the government couldn’t “hear” what we are all saying, they wouldn’t know what narrative they needed to craft to counter the truth… Goes both ways. NEXT!

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

There is a high bar to hit to even be granted an injunction. You must meet four criteria, as detailed below. 1. You are likely to succeed on the merits of your case. 2. There is a “substantial threat that you will suffer “irreparable injury” without it. 3. The injury you could sustain outweighs whatever “harm” the injunction could cause the other side 4. An injunction doesn’t disserve the public interest.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

FRAME THIS. “The Plaintiffs allege that federal officials ran afoul of the First Amendment by coercing and significantly encouraging social media platforms to censor disfavored speech, including by threats of adverse government action like antitrust enforcement and legal reforms. WE AGREE”

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The government CAN NOT abridge free speech. Private parties are not normally constrained by the first amendment. Again, the importance of this can not be understated. We are here because they government acted through threats to social media companies to censor “disfavored” viewpoints. Every case against a social media company for their TOS or their censorship moves has failed because Plaintiffs have targeted the social media company rather than the government. One exception I know of off the top of my head is the Berenson case, and he settled.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Took a quick pause for my carnivore lunch. Back in a moment.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

My thread broke here for some reason. No, I didn't take a VERY extended carnivore lunch..... https://t.co/hSVRWeyvDG

DrLoupis
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 12:01 PM
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 5:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Instagram and Facebook permanently shut down my accounts, including my personal and doctor pages, erasing cherished memories of my loved ones. Devastated, I seek guidance on what steps to take. No violations of Community guidelines were committed. Heartbroken and lost.

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

Instagram and Facebook just shut down all my accounts permanently with thousands of pictures and videos of my kids, friends, and family. They shut down my FB doctor page, my personal FB and my Instagram. There is absolutely nothing that goes against the Community guidelines. What do I do? I’m totally heartbroken.

w_terrence
Posted - October 16, 2023 at 11:28 PM
Saved - October 17, 2023 at 5:40 PM

@w_terrence - Terrence K. Williams

I was notified by Facebook and Instagram that my account will no longer be recommended or shown to people. This is disgraceful and unfair. I want to personally thank @elonmusk for not censoring my account.

HawleyMO
Posted - November 7, 2023 at 7:17 PM
Saved - November 8, 2023 at 2:11 PM

@HawleyMO - Josh Hawley

While Facebook was ignoring child sex abuse material on their platform, they were gleefully censoring speech on Covid and school board meetings at the behest of the Biden Administration. Priorities. https://t.co/DjhBsQbZHY

Video Transcript AI Summary
A case filed by Missouri against Biden reveals that federal courts found Facebook coordinated with the administration to censor First Amendment protected speech. Courts documented that Facebook allocated significant resources to monitor posts about COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. For instance, a parent in Missouri had a post about a school board meeting removed by Facebook's human moderators. In contrast, Facebook reportedly lacks the resources to address serious issues like child exploitation on its platform. This disparity highlights a troubling prioritization: ample resources for censoring speech but insufficient efforts to protect children from harm.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Case filed by my home state Missouri versus Biden. Landmark first amendment case in which 2 federal courts, federal district court and a federal court of appeals, have found that Facebook, among others, actively coordinated with the present administration to censor First Amendment protected speech, not this garbage that is not protected by anything in our constitution, but First Amendment protected speech. Here's what gets me. What the courts found, this is in the record, this is factual findings, is that Facebook devoted all kinds of resources and people, actual human people, to doing things like monitoring posts on COVID nineteen vaccine efficacy. There's one example of a parent in my home state of Missouri who wanted to post something about a school board meeting. Facebook used human moderators to go and take down that post. That was important. That has to come down. We can't have them posting about school board meetings for heaven's sake. But the things that your daughter experienced, the this this ring of pedophiles, rings plural, that Facebook just can't find the time for. They just don't have the resources for it. That, we just have to leave to, you know, let the market have its effect. Let AI do its job. We just don't have the resources for it. They had plenty of resources to to sense her first amendment speech, no resources to protect our children. Absolutely unconscionable.
libsoftiktok
Posted - December 31, 2023 at 4:03 AM
Saved - December 31, 2023 at 11:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Facebook has suspended Libs of TikTok, citing a violation of community standards. The suspension is seen as an increase in censorship ahead of the 2024 elections.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: @facebook just suspended Libs of TikTok. They claim we violated community standards.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Libs of TikTok was suspended from @facebook today. The censorship is ramping up as we head into the 2024 elections. Buckle up! https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-libs-of-tiktok-suspended-from-facebook-for-violating-community-standards?utm_campaign=64499

BREAKING: Libs of TikTok SUSPENDED from Facebook for violating ‘community standards’ “The people’s right to speak the truth will always win out over censors if people stay determined to tell it.” thepostmillennial.com
TWilsonOttawa
Posted - February 5, 2024 at 9:48 PM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 2:32 AM

@TWilsonOttawa - Tracey Wilson

.... posts are being scrubbed. https://t.co/YD8P7SDK2B

TexasLindsay_
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 6:16 PM
Saved - February 23, 2024 at 9:48 AM

@TexasLindsay_ - Te𝕏asLindsay™

How to get deleted in the digital world: continue using Meta, Google & YouTube. Zuckerberg deleted this woman—a fitness influencer—after she shared her myocarditis diagnosis with her followers. https://t.co/VqP8yWDtfA

stkirsch
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 4:13 AM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 4:27 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Wow. Look at how Facebook suppresses speech:

@oaxa - OaXa🛩 Pilot🕺 SwingDancer 🕉 Meditator

@sheislaurenlee and when I tried to post on Facebook https://t.co/vXfVoQa5LT

DaveBondyTV
Posted - October 6, 2024 at 3:20 PM
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 4:11 PM

@DaveBondyTV - Dave Bondy

🚨Look at this🚨 My friend sent me this. Facebook removed a post urging people to help hurricane victims. Seriously? @elonmusk https://t.co/eN1cofqk8a

shaneyyricch
Posted - October 6, 2024 at 5:35 PM
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 8:26 PM

@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch

This video I posted on Facebook last night just got TAKEN DOWN after amassing over 1.2 million views for “misinformation.” Watch till end and you’ll know exactly why. https://t.co/LRBNpnwO9S

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes they witnessed history at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, because Elon Musk endorsed Trump and spoke on stage. They claim Kamala Harris will destroy the country, but assert that unnamed people in suits are actually in charge, making decisions unknown to the public. The speaker identifies the media as the biggest enemy and threat, distributing "fear porn." They urge listeners to vote for Donald Trump to save the country, claiming that without a Trump victory, there will never be another election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's your honest reaction to the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania earlier today? I feel like I just witnessed history. Why do you say that? Because if you had told me in 2016 or even 2020 that Elon Musk would not only endorse Trump, but go on stage and speak at his rally, I I would say you're crazy. Kamala Harris will destroy our country because it's not Kamala Harris in charge. It's the people in the suits that we don't even know about making decisions that we don't even know about because the only decisions that we know about is what the media decides to tell us. The biggest enemy to the people and the biggest threat, it's not a single individual. It's not Kamal Harris. It's not tampon Tim Walz. It's not senile resident Joe Biden. It's the media. Do you know what the most popular category of porn is? Fear porn. And it's distributed by the media. So make sure that you make your voices heard. You cast your vote for Donald Trump. You save our country because if you don't, there's never gonna be another election again.
shaneyyricch
Posted - October 15, 2024 at 3:34 PM
Saved - October 16, 2024 at 1:45 PM

@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch

Dude. I just posted this video on Facebook - and after it amassed over 2.7 million views they removed it for “misinformation.” Watch it till the end and you’ll know exactly why. https://t.co/n50JRVBEPP

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm for Trump in 2024 because Republican viewpoints fit me better. The trials are propaganda, they're all friends like in the WWF. Trump, Biden, Obama. I'm for Trump's viewpoints because he's a businessman, and people only talk about him personally, not politically. He's a good politician because he's not one. Everybody has someone they can't stand, and he can't stand the same type of people others can't stand. When he was president, nobody was fighting wars. He and Dennis Rodman got along with Kim Jong Un, and he was the first president to go to North Korea. Everybody was getting money. He was real and told you how he felt. You knew what you were dealing with.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that Trump should go to jail? Hell, no. Why? We all break the law sometimes. It's alright. He ain't hurt nobody. Free that man. Yeah. I'm off of Trump, man. So you're saying Trump 2024? 2024. All day. All day. See? All day. Why? To To me, it's not really a Trump thing. It's just that, you know, the Republican point of views just fit me a little better. Do you think that the trials are making them more popular? This is all part of the plan. Yeah. All propaganda and bull. They're all friends like the WWF. Trump, Biden, Obama. They're all friends. This ain't number the series. You get a chance to write, direct, produce, and star in your own episode of life. I'm for the Trump point of views because, I mean, to me, he's just a businessman. Everybody that talk against him, talking personal. Nobody's even talking politics. I think he's a pretty good politician because he's not a politician. He might be a narcissist. And as far as that racist, everybody got mother they can't stand. And to be honest, he can't stand the same type of mother can't stand. And they're not black. They're not white. They're not Hispanic. He can't stand business. It's 4 kind of people on this planet. Four kind of adults. Men, women, and every race has them. He's not really down with the bitches that because I'm tired of them too. And when he was here, nobody was out fighting the war. Him and Dennis Rodman killed the shit with the dude in North Korea. Kim Jong Un. He was the 1st president to go to North Korea. Everybody was getting money. Yeah. It was cool. I'm listening to nobody, and I was balling. You know what I'm saying? It was cool. I mean, his watch, He was real. He was doing his job. And what I liked about him the most is the things that regular people hate about him the most. He was real. He told you how he felt. He could've lied like other politicians just to make you like him. One thing about him, you know what you're dealing with. You heard it here first.
shaneyyricch
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 4:11 PM
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 9:56 PM

@shaneyyricch - shaneyyricch

WTF? This video just got TAKEN DOWN for “hate speech” on Facebook after it amassed 650k views in less than 24 hours. I wonder why… https://t.co/VmOAamnec9

Video Transcript AI Summary
To those skeptical of another Trump presidency, look around and see the diverse communities present here. The America First Movement is inclusive; it welcomes everyone, regardless of background or beliefs. Our focus is on American citizens and ensuring they have equal opportunities to achieve the American dream. Your personal characteristics don't matter to us; what matters is your chance to succeed in this country. I urge you to vote, whether you're in Manhattan, Los Angeles, or Austin, Texas. Help us save our country this November.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you say to the people that are skeptical of another Donald Trump presidency? Like, there's people over there protesting saying that this rally is like a Nazi rally. What's your message to those people? Speaker 1: Look around. You have members of the Jewish community. You have members of the Arab community. You have members of the black community. You have members gay community. What people need to understand is this America First Movement is for all. I don't care who you are. I don't care what you believe. I don't care what you where you came from. We believe if you're an American citizen, you come first. And you deserve the right to the equality of opportunity that you can have the American dream. I don't care about any of your immutable character characteristics. I care about you have the opportunity to succeed in the United States of America. I ask for your vote. I don't care if you're in Manhattan or Los Angeles or Austin, Texas. You vote and you helped save our country this November.
sav_says_
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 7:33 PM
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 6:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Meta’s Instagram just removed my report about illegal immigrants using Facebook for fake IDs and social security cards, which I posted in May. They took it down just six days before the election. Seems like election year brings a bit of censorship.

@sav_says_ - Savanah Hernandez

Meta’s Instagram just censored my report exposing how illegal immigrants are using Facebook to buy fake IDs and social security cards across the US. I originally posted this back in May, but they just took it down 6 days before the election? https://t.co/bunJJIJ7Vg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Illegal immigrants are using Facebook to buy fake IDs, Social Security cards, and access human smuggling services. Various pages advertise fake driver's licenses that claim to pass authenticity checks, with sellers offering to create IDs for any state. Migrants can also rent activated accounts for services like Uber Eats and DoorDash, with one account rental priced at $500. Additionally, bank accounts can be rented for $25 a week. Human smuggling services are openly advertised, with pages like Coyote 502 promoting quick crossings from Mexico to the U.S. Smugglers offer competitive pricing and fast services, often communicating through voice messages to avoid written admissions of illegal activity. Despite the illegality of these actions, Meta allows these activities to persist on its platform across the U.S.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is how illegal immigrants are using Meta's Facebook to buy fake IDs and Social Security cards, access human smuggling services, and illegally work for Uber, DoorDash, and Instacart in online flea markets. For example, this page titled obtain your license to drive from the United States here advertises multiple fake driver's licenses in several videos alongside fake Social Security cards and even credit scores. As you scroll through this page, the seller even advertises that his IDs can pass an authenticity check, passing IDs under a black light, revealing a hologram security feature typically applied to real government issued driver's licenses. These fake licenses are advertised for every state, and we've reached out to the owner of this page who confirmed that he could create an ID for us in whichever state that we needed. He then sent us instructions on what information he would need to create the fake driver's license. And by the way, his page is one of many advertising this service across the US. Now you would typically need an ID or Social Security number to work for Uber Eats, for example. So this is one way illegal immigrants can have access to IDs. Or you can go the route of finding advertisements on Facebook pages promoting the activation or rental of Uber Eats, DoorDash, or Instacart accounts. On these pages, migrants can buy an already activated food delivery account or rent one out from another user. One woman posted an image reading rent account for DoorDash in Spanish. We reached out to her to ask her how much she was renting the account for, to which she responded that it was $500. Alongside a driver's license and Social Security number, a bank account is also something a migrant might need to start a food delivery account. Luckily for them, that's also something that can be rented out. On the Latinos in the Bronx, Queens, Manhattan, and Brooklyn Facebook page, we found someone renting out a bank account for $25 a week. But before migrants can even access illegal work in the US, they need to make it into the country first. And luckily for them, Facebook also allows the advertisement of human smuggling services on their platforms too. One page titled Coyote 502 boasts almost 100,000 followers with this page regularly posting videos of large groups of migrants walking through and being smuggled throughout Mexico. In the comments of these videos, migrants are told they can be brought over from Mexico into the US within 20 minutes. Other migrants who have used the smuggling service post selfies and videos of their walk, and other smugglers comment counter offers promising to smuggle migrants in even faster and cheaper than their counterpart. The Coyote 502 page has also posted videos driving throughout US cities and walking migrants through Sonora, Mexico. On another page called Flee Market of Phoenix, we found a smuggler who advertised his services by posting a video of migrants climbing over the border wall. The page we found him on, by the way, has over 72,000 followers. Now after seeing his advertisement, we reached out to him asking him to clarify his services, to which he responded with el brinco, meaning the jump. He then commented that his service would be fast, easy, and secure, and then he sent us 2 videos. 1 was that original ad of these smugglers hoisting a ladder and bringing people over the border wall, and another advertised the trail he uses, sharing that he could get us over from Mexico into the US in 30 minutes or less. As we continued asking questions, he transferred over from written text to voice messages as a way to discuss his services without putting admissions of illegal activity in writing. He verbally gave us pricing, sharing that it would be 75100 per person, adding that he would give us a $1,000 per person finder's fee for every migrant we referred to him. And again, this is one of many pages advertising these services across the US. Now typically creating or obtaining a fake form of identification or smuggling a human being across the border would be a felony, and working illegally would result in deportation. However, Meta is allowing this illegal activity to take place on Facebook every single day, and these online flea markets can be found in every city and state across the US, even those that don't have sanctuary laws for illegal immigrants.

@sav_says_ - Savanah Hernandez

Wouldn’t be election year without a little bit of censorship right? https://t.co/mEMZguZNO8

Unitedcajunnavy
Posted - October 30, 2024 at 1:41 PM
Saved - October 31, 2024 at 4:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Facebook has restricted our page, threatening to shut us down for allegedly making the government look bad and possibly influencing the election. They won't specify which community standards we've violated, and attempts to resolve this lead to error messages. I'm frustrated and need help fighting censorship!

@Unitedcajunnavy - United Cajun Navy

#Facebook has restricted our page and is now threatening to shut us down because "we're making the government look bad and it may influence the election." They refuse to tell us which "community standards" we've violated, and any attempt to fix it gets a convenient error message. WTF?! #CajunNavy @X friends: Help us fight censorship! https://unitedcajunnavy.org/

United Cajun Navy The United Cajun Navy knows that our strength lies not only in the words we stand by but most importantly through the actions of our initiatives. unitedcajunnavy.org
piersmorgan
Posted - November 6, 2024 at 9:24 PM
Saved - November 7, 2024 at 3:14 PM

@piersmorgan - Piers Morgan

This is hilarious.. @instagram has taken down my congratulations pic/msg to @realDonaldTrump on the grounds that it’s ’hate speech.’ https://t.co/m0V8GkDWH2

LauraLoomer
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 10:19 PM
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 2:21 AM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Facebook is also now deleting posts off of the suspected shooters’ account. I’m watching it in real time.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨 Instagram just nuked the account of Luigi Mangione, the suspected alleged United Healthcare CEO shooter. Here’s a screen recording of every one of the 10 posts on his Instagram account in case you want to see what Instagram just deleted. https://t.co/XV5uudYFqc

BrandonStraka
Posted - January 7, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Saved - January 8, 2025 at 3:01 PM

@BrandonStraka - Brandon Straka #WalkAway

Then restore #WalkAway Campaign, and give my team their personal accounts back. @finkd Facebook deleted the #WalkAway Campaign group and the personal and business accounts of every admin of the group with no explanation or opportunity for redress. https://t.co/aX0QupAD1d

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're returning to our roots of free expression on Facebook and Instagram. While we've implemented complex content moderation systems, they've led to too many mistakes and excessive censorship. To address this, we will replace fact-checkers with a community notes system, simplify content policies, and focus enforcement on serious violations. We'll also reintroduce civic content based on user feedback and relocate our trust and safety teams to Texas to reduce perceived bias. Additionally, we will collaborate with the U.S. government to combat global censorship trends. Our goal is to prioritize free expression while responsibly managing harmful content. We're committed to reducing errors and simplifying our systems to empower voices on our platforms. More updates will follow.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. I wanna talk about something important today because it's time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram. I started building social media to give people a voice. I gave a speech at Georgetown 5 years ago about the importance of protecting free expression, and I still believe this today. But a lot has happened over the last several years. There's been widespread debate about potential harms from online content. Governments and legacy media have pushed to censor more and more. A lot of this is clearly political, but there's also a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there. Drugs, terrorism, child exploitation. These are things that we take very seriously, and I wanna make sure that we handle responsibly. So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content. But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. Even if they accidentally censor just 1% of posts, that's millions of people. And we've reached a point where it's just too many mistakes and too much censorship. The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech. So we're gonna get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms. More specifically, here's what we're gonna do. 1st, we're gonna get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X starting in the US. After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote nonstop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy. We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth, but the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the US. So over the next couple of months, we're gonna phase in a more comprehensive community note system. 2nd, we're gonna simplify our content policies and get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender, that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse. What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it's gone too far. So I wanna make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms. 3rd, we're changing how we enforce our policies to reduce the mistakes that account for the vast majority of censorship on our platforms. We used to have filters that scanned for any policy violation. Now, we're gonna focus those filters on tackling illegal and high severity violations. And for lower severity violations, we're going to rely on someone reporting an issue before we take action. The problem is that the filters make mistakes, and they take down a lot of content that they shouldn't. So by dialing them back, we're gonna dramatically reduce the amount of censorship on our platforms. We're also going to tune our content filters to require much higher confidence before taking down content. The reality is that this is a trade off. It means we're going to catch less bad stuff. But we'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. 4th, we're bringing back civic content. For a while, the community asked to see less politics because it was making people stressed. So we stopped recommending these posts. But it feels like we're in a new era now, and we're starting to get feedback that people wanna see this content again. So we're gonna start phasing this back into Facebook, Instagram, and threads while working to keep the communities friendly and positive. 5th, we're gonna move our trust and safety and content moderation teams out of California, and our US based content review is gonna be based in Texas. As we work to promote free expression, I think that will help us build trust to do this work in places where there is less concern about the bias of our teams. Finally, we're gonna work with President Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more. The US has the strongest constitutional protections for free expression in the world. Europe has an ever increasing number of laws institutionalizing censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative there. Latin American countries have secret courts that can order companies to quietly take things down. China has censored our apps from even working in the country. The only way that we can push back on this global trend is with the support of the US government. And that's why it's been so difficult over the past 4 years when even the US government has pushed for censorship. By going after us and other American companies, it has emboldened other governments to go even further. But now we have the opportunity to restore free expression, and I am excited to take it. It'll take time to get this right. And these are complex systems. They're never gonna be perfect. There's also a lot of illegal stuff that we still need to work very hard to remove. But the bottom line is that after years of having our content moderation work focused primarily on removing content, it is time to focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our systems, and getting back to our roots about giving people voice. I'm looking forward to this next chapter. Stay good out there, and more to come soon.
SarahisCensored
Posted - March 18, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 8:47 PM

@SarahisCensored - Sarah Fields

Harry Sisson’s mob has begun mass-reporting me on TikTok. They even got a video from two weeks ago removed just now and restricted five other videos. My account was in perfect health this morning. https://t.co/1ZhnIREGA5

jakeshieldsajj
Posted - May 29, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Saved - May 29, 2025 at 10:14 AM

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Patriot Front posted this video and had their account deleted If this is the free speech app why isn't Thomas Rousseau allowed free speech? https://t.co/v5amm3JE6R

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patriot Front addresses criticisms, particularly allegations of being a "fed" organization. They defend wearing masks as protection from hostile entities, citing instances of vandalism against members. They claim that media attention disproves the "fed" accusation, arguing the media actively seeks to expose them. The organization defends its uniform appearance and planned demonstrations, stating they aim to attract attention and spark discussion. They reject the idea of "optics," preferring to present themselves authentically. Patriot Front outlines its views: a nationalist, isolationist, and nativist vision for America, with anti-immigration and pro-family stances. They address claims of being controlled opposition, particularly regarding Jewish influence, denying any positive stance towards Jews or Judaism. They refute claims of orchestrating events to get members arrested, citing a specific case in Idaho. The speaker emphasizes the importance of marching as a marketing tactic and dismisses criticisms about their appearance and symbols as insubstantial. They advocate for building a broader movement that transcends online subcultures.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys need to into optics. Optics, baby. Optics. Optics. Optics. Optics. Optics. We could play rap music at our demonstration. Feds. Feds. Feds. He is fed 100%. It's not magic. We plan ahead. Lay Nazis and lay white supremacists. Jews. Jewish power. Jews. Jews. Jews. Judaism. We do not want to be normal. Well, this eye contact is for you. Swarmed by an army of Hitler loving psychos. Real white guys never talk. Feds. Feds. Feds. Feds. Feds. Someone whose name sounds Mexican says, yeah. Hashtag MAGA. Murder for hire. Human trafficking. Drug dealing. Counterfeiting currency. Thomas Rousseau must be super sad. White devil. Try harder. So we've decided to compile an analog Twitter so that I may see a bunch of tweets that usually I'm not able to. Regarding the organization, its practice, we're gonna go through a number of comments from detractors, and we are going to give our honest, genuine, and unscripted response. Let's get into it. So let's start with one. Richard says, patriots don't hide behind masks nor do they magically appear, all wearing the same uniform arriving in vehicles with blanked out license plates, feds. Some patriots may not wear masks, but many of them do. Wearing masks is a tried and tested practice to, defend people's information against a government which is hostile to that. You can ask people at January 6 or any number of conservative protests around the country if they would have rather worn masks after their families were after their homes were vandalized by antifa. These things have happened to members of the organization. We have every reason to wear masks. We have every reason to hide our identities, not from our supporters, but from the people who want to harm us. And we don't magically appear wearing the same uniform arriving in vehicles either. It's not magic. We plan ahead. We tell people what to wear. There's nothing magical about a box truck. In fact, you could rent one yourself. U Haul and Penske are actually businesses that are entirely based on regular people renting their box trucks. It's really quite affordable. And the blanked out license plates he's talking about, that's a single video from Chicago in twenty twenty one or two was allowed because there were no police present. There was Antifa and there are vigilante photographers, but there were no police present. And frankly, the police in Chicago have bigger things to worry about than a half dozen vehicles with some tape over their license plates for about three minutes flat. Does any of this prove we're feds? No. We have here by Wall Street Silver. If Patriot Front was actually a real organic white supremacy group, the media would be all over this story to expose every member and ruin their lives. The fact that this is not happening confirms that they are feds. The media is all over Patriot Front, and that's why you know about patriot front. The media does seek people's identities. They do share them, and they do make concerted efforts to disparage them. And the fact that it is happening should confirm that we're not feds to you. The fact that you don't know more confirms that you are pushing a questionable agenda whenever you come around every month or two to say the same crap. Next up, mister tangible ghost. The message is correct. They have been met with zero opposition. The streets around them are empty where they protest beyond suspicious to him, he says. Well, the fact of the matter is we have plenty of opposition. You can look at any of our videos where we often highlight it. Sometimes you might see police around us, such as in cases in Washington DC. But the police are there not to protect us from other people or protect other people from us. They're there to partition various groups of differing ideas and opinions so that nobody directly interacts with each other because sometimes in America, politically, that turns violent and cops really don't like the way that looks in Washington DC. I could provide plenty of examples of opposition hollering at us, opposition trying to attack us, opposition trying to attack our vehicles, or meeting us in person. I'm sure we'll be playing a few of those examples right now. The fact that the streets may be empty in one part or another, that's just how cities work. The fact that it's suspicious to you means that you need to get better suspicions. The upside down American flag is not a good look, says Ezra. The state of the country is not a good look. The flag is the least of our worries. John says they could at least throw in a few 50 year olds with giant beer bellies to make it remotely believable. I imagine you might be a man, 50 year olds with a, quote, giant beer belly, but the fact of the matter is Patriot Front does not permit members to be giant beer bellied for very long. Members can join the organization and be out of shape, but we work to get them in shape. Now you might say, why? If you look at videos in the past of the country for four hundred years, it was very normal to see a large group of American men, none of whom had a stomach that stuck out past their toes. The idea that that is some sort of political qualifying factor in the modern day is only emblematic of how far we have declined as men of masculine virtue in demanding standards from our countrymen. It's ridiculous, and I understand what he's saying. You know, normal groups have fat folks in them. I get that. But we are not trying to be normal because what is normal is not the proper state of things. The organization is aspirational. We want things to get better, so we will not look like the way things are. Mister European revolution. Thomas here could have dressed more normally. People trusted identity Europa because Nathan D'Amigo was well dressed, normally dressed, normally appearing individual. You guys need to into optics. Optics, baby. Optics. If they look smart and sound smart, they'll hella win. I would consider myself well dressed. What is normal? If we wanted to be truly normal, we could play rap music at our demonstrations. If we wanted to be truly normal, we could vote for do nothing republicans. We do not want to be normal. We want to be aspirational. The look of our demonstrations is unusual. It is not normal for hundreds of men to march around in uniform with flags, shields, banners, and drums. That is not normal. You are correct. It is not intended to be normal. It is intended to attract attention, to be recognizable, to be emblematic, to catch eyes and make people have an opinion, to make people discuss as you are now. I also thirdly, I reject the notion of optics. I reject the label of optics. Optics is a silly idea that we need to cultivate and manipulate our image so that people are tricked into liking us. I only ever wanna portray who and what and how I am. Optics as an idea of filtering my appearance to appeal to a certain group of people, I'm going to be and I'm gonna have integrity. And if people like me because of that, then they like what I am, not only what I do. Next. Mister Trad revival operator says, I still have no idea what views, mission statement, political stances, or end goals are. They just show up whenever the media wants to remind us that, lay Nazis and lay white supremacists are still a thing. Well, mister Trad revival. Views, mission statement, political stances, and end goals have all been explained ad nauseam in a great number of videos, podcasts, interviews. I'll give you a brief summary in this message right here. Is a nationalist activist group. We believe in traditional American forms of government imbued with the lessons of the past several decades to create a nationalist, an isolationist, a nativist form of life in the country. Mission statement. We wanna organize people to change minds, lives, and bodies to accomplish goals and to make the country look more like we like it and less like we don't. Political stances. Anti immigration. Pro family. Money should not rule the political system and instead the economy should serve the people. We are anti foreign war. The list goes on. End goals, national republic. We want the American people to be represented in a body of government that is more properly representative of what Americans have known in the past and what we can instill in the future. And the idea we just show up whenever the media wants to remind us that Nazis are still around. We show up very regularly all around the country all the time. The media is responding to us. We are not responding to the media. Patriot Front is always active. Biden is always talking about racism. The fact that once or twice those things happen on the same day is not hard to believe. We have a, Russian bot, and that's his name. He's saying marching IRL has no value. Well, the fact that you know we march IRL as opposed to marching in line has value because you know about it. It has value because you're talking about it. Marching does not need to change the world. It does not need to change political policy. It doesn't even need to change somebody's opinion, even though sometimes it does. It only has to be worth doing, and its chief worth is as a marketing tactic. Its chief worth is to create discussion, to agitate the political discussion in the political sphere, and the fact that everybody knows about due to our marches marches and not primarily due to our other charitable works, which you could say have a greater impact, or our training or our book clubs. People don't broadly know about us due to those other things, which many people would agree are worthwhile endeavors, but they know about us because of our marches. Why? Because our marches are effective. And as long as they're effective, we're gonna keep doing them. As long as anything we do has the desired result with minimal risk and cost effective methodology, we're gonna keep doing it. Let's see. I'm not gonna attempt to pronounce this gentleman's name. He finally mentioned the Israel lobby. Until he focuses on the number one issue, that there was a Jewish mafia running America and not just about general stuff like all the useless politician. I will continue to think that is controlled opposition. This guy, I believe, heard one instance where I mentioned the Israel lobby and not the many many many other times that I have. And it's important for honest and valuable discussion online that when you see one thing in particular that one person might have said, don't assume that that is a representation of everything else they ever said or that they have never said anything else like that. And I think that is the chief mistake which was made here. I do know that there is a large number of Jews in America that are disproportionately represented in positions of power, that steer the government on a number of significant issues, especially foreign policy and immigration, towards more liberal and internationalist position. One of the most notable examples of us talking about Jewish power would be our march in New York at the World Trade Center, where we had a no Zionist in government banner, which was probably 60 feet long. We demonstrated in front of the Wall Street Stock Exchange. If that's not loud enough for you, I'd like to see what you've done that's louder. And the fact that is controlled opposition, you really need to ask yourself if you're gonna make an accusation that. Controlled by who? Is controlled to make Jews look good? How do we do that? Am I positive on Jews? No. I'm absolutely not. Do I think Jews are Americans? No. I absolutely do not. Do I think Judaism is a practice of religion that could work with the patriot front's ideals and morals? No. I do not. How would that work? Other allegations of controlled opposition. Patriot front exists to make conservatives look bad. How do we do that? By being in good shape, lack of 50 year old beer bellies. Is it because we're violent? Well, we're not. Is it because we go out and commit crimes? Well, we don't. Is it because we go out and do charitable works? That wouldn't make any These accusations are made more out of someone perhaps having a cultural disinclination towards our appearance or towards the types of person which might be getting involved in patriot front and not a core ideological issue. In many cases, the people who say things like this actually agree with us on almost everything, but online tribalism convinces people that they need to take up sides in matters which there's no purpose to. Next. The European revolution again. You know, there's weird symbols like the thing on my hat, which is a cockade. It's a ribbon that is hundreds of years old and meant to symbolize loyalty to the nation whose colors it represents. Mine is America. Most people will see it and not know what the heck it is or why it's there. He wears a hat at all. Make basic one with no symbols at all. Don't wear sunglasses and make sincere eye contact. Well, this eye contact is for you. You know, the fact of the matter is your hat shouldn't have a ribbon on. Is that your issue with Patriot Front? Is it is that the reason why Patriot Front is not an acceptable organization that my hat has a ribbon? That I wore sunglasses once? These are not substantial critiques. These are not real protests that somebody should have to an organization which is doing the right thing. None nothing we do is weird in so far as it is all rooted in American history and culture. And the fact that something may be common at one point in our history, but not common right now is an element for our ideology and not against. We need to uphold and continue our cultural traditions as American because that is emblematic of our heritage. If we start deciding that, oh, well, something from our past, well, it's not common now, so it's weird, it's strange, and we shouldn't do it anymore. I feel like that's seeding ground to the architects of the modern culture. It's neoliberal. It's science. The modern culture is uprooted. The modern culture despises American heritage and the true story of American history. And because of that, that has allowed America to become what it is now. So again, the obsession with something that we need to be more normal, more presentable. We do not want to be normal. We do not want to be ordinary. We are not ordinary. We are extraordinary. And anybody who is ordinary among us needs to be aspiring to be better because our worth as a faithful few nationalists amidst a country of tens and tens of millions is very significant, and we should be aspirational. Now plenty people are gonna be plenty normal. Members of the organization are normal. They have jobs, they have families, they have commutes to work, they have hobbies, they have interests. But the fact of the matter is together when we work as an organization, we can do something which is more than normal. Mister Ryan Dawson says, Patriot Front is crawling with feds. Now he wouldn't be able to provide you a single example of any fed that he claims that we're crawling with for reference. The van full of these easy marks got arrested before they arrived in Idaho because an informant inside the group told on. Now let me clarify this point. The truck full of activists in Idaho was arrested because somebody called the cops on us and essentially, if you're familiar with the term, swatted us, making outlandish statements to the police which were not substantiated by the police having any visual knowledge of us. Now the police stopped us and decided to arrest and charge us with something before they even saw us. Police officers were confirming the charge that they were thinking about before they opened the door. There could have been anything behind that door. Why were they so confident that we were there to riot? Based purely on a lacking specifics description from a man on the phone who could have been anyone saying anything. The informant was a man calling the police. There was nobody inside the van. One police officer did give an interview saying, we've got people everywhere. Something like that. That cop didn't know anything more about Idaho than you do, at least not the arrest. Plenty of confirmation. You can look through the court documents. There's no sealed documents that indicate any sealed indictment or any secret sources. Ridiculous, and it's false. Again, if you have these allegations, if you have proof, show me who the fed is. I would like to know. The drunk rebuttal to this based on wishful thinking. I'm not gonna expletive on people trying to stop drag queen story hour or there isn't a fed just because they're in shape. Well, sure there are plenty of feds that aren't in shape. I agree. You shouldn't dog on people who are trying to protest these drag queen events. We've done a dozen more of these such events. If we had informants, FBI agents who were trying to sabotage and entrap us, then why did all of these other protests with different circumstances and locations go just fine? The end result and conclusion has to be that it was a very specific set of circumstances and a very underprepared police force that was very eager to unlawfully arrest people that resulted in the legal cases in Idaho. Says the group exists as a as a flypaper to gather everyone against drag queens and then get them arrested. That's what COINTELPRO does. So let me walk through this. Patriot Front has existed for seven years, and for the first four or five years of its existence, it does not protest a single drag queen event. And then the feds decide after five years of building up a group doing many other things, it's time to get them all arrested at one of these protests. And the result is 30 misdemeanor charges, many of which are resolved without convictions on those misdemeanors, and several are dismissed due to a lack of evidence. If the federal government is setting up this case, why was there no evidence to substantiate it? Mister Dawson, show me where the proof was that I was there to commit a single act of violence. I would love to see if you have it because the prosecution sure didn't. Mister Fly Gojo or Goho says, good speech. I think the organization would better serve by developing a legal infrastructure to defend white people with, I e, a pro white ADL type organization rather than marching in the streets. I'd love to get right on that, but the fact of the matter is you need to understand the logistics and the differences in what you're asked. If I could have the resources and the opportunities available to me right now to create a legal organization that could employ a lot of lawyers and engage in a lot of litigation, that would be great. And I would certainly see about pursuing anything that was productive in that. As Patriot Front grows, it will do more things as opportunities present themselves. I don't think it's a bad thing what you're suggesting, but you need to understand how organizing works and how resources come into play. And perhaps if you really value this suggestion and there's some actionable steps forward, you should get involved and make it a reality if you wanna see us doing something which we're not doing. Do you not see the parallels between his, my, physiognomy and Fuentes? One of them is an AstroTurf version of the other, presumably I and the astroturf version of Fuentes. I don't know how much detail I can get into this without sounding disrespectful towards the man, so I won't compare our physiognomy. Physiogamy, not physiognomy. So you don't know. Don't mean to counter signal the guy, presumably me, but he's basically saying that the idea of an American has gone from being an Anglo to being European, and that America serves to facilitate the mixing of European ethnicities into one. Is that true? The organization or America does not serve to facilitate the mixing of European ethnicities into one in Europe. Europeans from wherever in Europe they may come from that come to America do end up assimilating or should, in any case, assimilate to the American nationality and ethnicity. So in America, that is true. In Europe, it is not. What Europeans decide to do with their ethnicity and their own rules for assimilation is up to them. So Joe, the patriot front, exists to maintain the fake but increasingly popular narrative that white people are inherently racist. That's why every time I make this point on social media, I'm immediately swarmed by an army of Hitler loving psychos. Anyone viewing this post will see me outnumbered 20 to one and be led to believe that white people really are just a bunch of racists, like the media has been saying. So there's a lot to get into in this comment. First one, I don't know if I've really ever mentioned Hitler in any substantial way in my entire political career, and I don't think it would be apt to label me as psychotic. And when you talk about the number of white people, which you use the term racist, which is a meaningless insult, but the number of white folks or people of European descent who believe that race is a real and countable factor of society and should be recognized as such from the point of view of Americans, of the European race. The fact that a lot of people believe that might be an inclination that you are in the wrong. It might be an inclination that you need to realize that a color blind view of nationalism or patriotism is not possible. It is internally incongruous. And the fact that the media says people are racist is the media's prerogative. If the media says something bad about me, saying it's my fault is ridiculous. If people have issues or concerns I say regarding what I say, they need to use what I say as a result of it and not go merely by the media's definitions. If you don't trust the media about anything else, then why would you trust them in regarding patriot front? Someone whose name sounds Mexican says, yep. And our FBI could easily arrest their organizers with RICO charges, but they don't. Because when you get down to it, it's our FBI that's behind them, just like BLM, just like Antifa, and also just like the Patriot Front. The thing about RICO as a criminal statute, it is very often brought up in a broad and very overbroad piece of rhetoric, almost as a fear mongering tactic. There are a certain number of detailed RICO predicate offenses, which include things like murder for hire, human trafficking, drug dealing, counterfeiting currency, and Patriot Front is not engaged in any of those nor will it ever be. The idea that the government has a catch all way to arrest people based on political affiliation alone, not including any criminal activity or conspiracy thereof, is ridiculous and is a fear mongering tactic likely that the FBI finds very agreeable because it keeps people paranoid and not organized. I can't speak to the validity of BLM as a movement. I know there's a lot of NGOs involved with that. I cannot speak to the validity of ANTIFA as a movement. I know there's a lot of NGOs and funding that goes there. There are government grants which trickle down into those less leftist movements, but that is because the political left has worked its way through a lot of institutions to become recipient of that kind of institutional support. Nationalists have not done that at the moment to the same scale that a lot of people on the fringes of the left have. And that's why it's important to promote and support nationalist organizations and patriotic movements that are aiming to achieve more popularity, that are aiming to achieve a better allocation of resources to themselves and from the outside of their organization. Mister Meh, those poor patriot front boy, they're trying so hard for hashtag MAGA to accept them, but they keep getting called feds. Crying emoji. They just want to be alt right so bad. They have uniforms due training, try to march together. Thomas Rousseau must be super sad he's not being accepted. This comment is based on a number of falsehoods and misconceptions. I don't necessarily want MAGA to accept me for anything. I am going to represent myself and be what I am and say what I believe. If somebody decides to support me for that wherever they are in the political spectrum, I'll be okay with that. But I am not changing anything about what I do or angling anything I say with the specific intent of people in hashtag MAGA to support me. The fact that people keep calling us feds is actually probably a result of our success. Where certain people are high up in the conservative social media echelons have decided that that is a valuable tactic to use against patriot front, to keep people in their previous frames of mind, and keep them away from coming to certain realizations about America, its history, and nationalism and patriotism as political ideologies. I think our movement has been very successful so far in spite of all the challenges that have been placed against it, and in spite of all the naysayers and detractors such as yourself, of which you are by far not the greatest. Fire harder. Chris Jacob. He is fed 100%. I know real white guys who were banned, persecuted, and on the run, and their domain seized. Andrew Anglin is one of the real white guys. Search him out. Check out Daily Stormer. The real white guys never talk. This script, they are too wild. Straight from the heart. If your statement that everybody who has not had a domain name seized by its domain provider is a federal agent, then you can run with that. But it is not a real metric to go by at all. The fact that white guys who are real and not fake are too wild to write down what they say before they say it is frankly an indictment on your opinion of the white race. And I believe men of European heritage and specifically of the American extraction should be mannered in their forms of speech and conduct in such a way that sometimes they might know what they're saying before they say it, and I try to do so often. A seminal white devil telling white lies as usual, stealing racial identities and heritage. American is a term meant for the aboriginal races of people throughout The Americas. At this point, I don't think you can pay whitey to tell the truth about American history. Well, that's interesting. Because if American as a term is meant for the aboriginal races, as you say, then I would love to see any historical examples of the term American being applied before Europeans arrived in the New World, which it wasn't. America and American as a national identity is a result of European colonization, expansion, and conquered. I do not want to steal any racial identities. I want to maintain my own and acknowledge that it exists and has existed as a vital part of the history of my nation. I am telling the truth about America. The fact that that truth may not paint your people in the best of light isn't my problem. I've already responded to that guy. I agree with the message, says mister Forbes, but not the marching. The goal should be to cause the left to overextend, gaining the more moral appearance of defense. Then have at it, not to put yourselves in an overextension prematurely. Now mister Forbes probably only knows about our message because of the marching, again proving that there is a purpose and a reward to the demonstration. If we need to have the left overextend to prosecute us, then we've already done it. There have been false cases used against Patriot Front. My case in Idaho was dismissed because there was not the predicate evidence to prosecute. Various other false cases have been alleged against Patriot Front members and a cause that Patriot Front represents, and they have fallen flat. Many attempts by the media and anarchists to infiltrate or slander the organization have been tried and have failed. That is not an example of overextension. For the opponents to try something which is not successful, then I don't know what is. And I won't even aim to interpret what you mean by and then have at it because I try not to use coded language. So that's everything. And I hope some of these responses were informative or elucidating for some of the people that might have their concerns about the organization. But trust genuinely that there's a lot of people out there, especially on Twitter or X that want to spread misinformation and lies, not just about patriot front, but about a great number of things to instill a culture of paranoia, to instill a culture of distrust. And also, there are a great number of people in the so called movement that really want to stay in a very specific niche of political activity, and they might feel threatened or uncomfortable by things that are outside of that niche. And I understand that. But what we need as a movement for sovereignty is we need to build up organizations and movements that cross over all these various preferences and niches to create something which can truly contain an entire lifestyle and a way of life additionally. A community or a link of many communities around the country is what's needed, and you're not going to be able to do that if you're too particular about an online subculture. I understand why a lot of people are involved in those sorts of things, but you need to broaden your perspective. Anyways, I hope this has been educating. I hope this has been instructive. We may do it again sometime.
Excavationpro
Posted - May 31, 2025 at 12:53 AM
Saved - May 31, 2025 at 2:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw a video get deleted about Mr. Black eye and I'm curious why they're removing posts on it. There's talk about the archon Parasite and how elites are controlled by a worm that goes into the eye socket. Others seem to agree with this perspective.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

I just watched a video get deleted on Mr Black eye here... Wanna know why they are deleting the posts about it?

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

@nc8tz97rgv @HerbsandDirt @Kabamur_Taygeta It’s the archon Parasite 🪱 the elites are controlled with a worm that goes into the eye socket.

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

@Excavationpro - 👷‍🎶Excavationpro🧡🚧

@penny_peppers @nc8tz97rgv @HerbsandDirt @Kabamur_Taygeta Yea or that... You are correct, that is also an option. https://www.clonaid.com/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims reptilian shape-shifters are real but not interdimensional. Cloning has been occurring since the end of World War II, with two types: replication and duplication. Mark 2 clones are REM-driven, allowing consciousness transfer during sleep, which is how the Illuminati communicate. Initially, tissue samples were needed, including discarded foreskins, but now blood is sufficient. The speaker says cloning is common among the elite for various purposes. Britney Spears allegedly sold the use of her clone, and clones are used for sex. The speaker claims cloning results in flawed copies, like in "Pet Sematary." Acting disloyal at the cloning center results in torture of one's clone. Cloning facilities exist in deep underground bases, like Dulce, which also has a gene-splicing floor. School pictures are used to select children for cloning as sex slaves. The speaker claims the Picton murders were staged and videotaped by the elite. The speaker says they were brought to the cloning center at age five and wrote original songs that were used by famous people. Tila Tequila knows about the cloning centers but was warned not to help the speaker.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's it's about those reptilian shape shifters that David Ick Ick talks about. He's he's kinda got the story wrong. They're not dimensional at all at all. They're this dimension. And, yeah, they're not spiritual, mystical or anything. It's pretty sick. But I'll tell you about that in a second. First, I wanted to tell you about the cloning stuff. Okay? Now, cloning, I have to tell you it's been done since at the end of World War two. Okay? I'll tell you how they got it and the whole shebang, like, third degree Freemason knowledge. I'm probably gonna die for this somewhere along the lines. It's not good. Okay. Picture this on memory memory request about everything. Couldn't remember anything. I'm still getting side effects from this. About I I was memory repressed about the cloning stuff until I was 30 years old. They call it the awakening when they give you back the memories. Turns out they had me there since I was five years old. Okay? And my family is there, my family members and everything. And they said they're not gonna lie on a lie detector test about it. It's it's pretty big. Like, they were gonna kill me, they said. Thing is, the way that this cloning works okay? There's two different kinds of cloning, and it confuses people. Now there's, replication cloning where it comes up as a baby. Right? Put the cells in, make the same person as a baby. Well, there's duplication cloning as well where they grow you in a big thick tank, fill it full of water. And, well, there's a few different grades of cloning. There's mark one to four that I know And the problem I'm having is with the Mark two. Thing is, Mark one was around at the end of the the World War two, but it was a primitive clone, lots of side effects. Anyway, this is even on the net. I before I started blasting on the net about this, somebody said something about the mark one to four clones, and the first one being called the organic robotoid. And that's what it was called even though there's no robotic parts in it at all. Anyway, mark two is an REM driven clone. Okay? Now what that means is when you go to sleep, the Illuminati, this is their main form of communication too. They don't call people on the phone. They don't meet at the Bohemian Grove anymore. Since they got cloning, they meet at the cloning station when they go to sleep. Each of them I don't know how they do it exactly, okay, or else I'd know how to block it. But they can transfer your consciousness into a clone at the cloning station if they have a clone of you. And they used to have to use a tissue sample from you or I guess they said the cells from a woman's pap smear is like really rich in the cells to make one of these duplicate clones. They used to use kids' foreskins that were discarded at the hospital that got removed. That's what happened to me. But now, they said they've upgraded the technology in the last ten years, so now they only need blood. What they used to do with the tissue, well, they could also they used to set this little oil drill looking thing over a person's forearm, strap their arm to a chair. And this drill, it had things on it that opened up. Right? Now, it would go in, and when it spun, these things would open up. But then when it stopped, the things the things would close again. Now this is done it goes in comes out in comes out and what's what it was doing it it has to agitate the tissue they told me when I was a kid to a certain degree. Guess, like, they said the easiest way to tell a person in layman's terms about it is, you know, when you have a hangnail and you pull it off and the white stuff that accumulates inside, and eventually it'll form like scab and new skin and it'll grow over. Well, to get that white stuff to really work good, they agitate the tissue a certain amount of times. Now they just agitate blood from like a blood sample even. And, yeah, cloning is very prevalent. It's like a secret thing among the, like, elite. They use it for their crazy stuff. You name it. They've done it. Like, jump off cliffs, everything. I know all about it. The thing was, when I was memory repressed, I was seeing other people becoming unmemory repressed, and I hated this place and these people. It's a bunch of scumbags doing nasty things to each other. Right? Like, there's privileged ones there, and there's underprivileged ones there. And so people are pretty mean on people. And, well, I wanted them to to do the awakening on me so I could go to the cops and get the cops on them. Well, the thing is they are the cops too. Like, this is the lynchpin in how the Illuminati NWL works because, like, most of the leaders from the G20 countries go there, about 14 of the G20 countries. And then there's leaders from countries that don't even fit in the G20 that go there too. Right? Cloning, it's it's really normal. Well, Britney Spears made a video about this place because thing was to get advertised and promoted and stuff, she had to basically sell her clone, use of her clone at the cloning center. So the thing was she signed up right away thinking, yeah. Sure. I'll be famous, famous. Well, thing is, they wanted to use her every night. Old men and stuff. Old men and clones on her and real people on her clones too. So she doesn't have dreams anymore. Oh, they make songs and stuff about this all the time, but stuck in the dreams and Freddie, Nightmare on Elm Street is based on this. Avatar is based on this too. They do it all the time, communicate this way, but the thing is clones cloning is a flawed technology this way because your mind isn't the same. You're more it's kinda like, you know, how did you ever see Pet Sematary by Stephen King, the movie? Yeah. Where they bury it and they come back whack? Well, they're almost as bad as that. And this is only one aspect of what they do. This is like this is the the biggest expose on the Illuminati guys ever, what they do secret secret. Right? Because the thing being how I know is because I acted very loyal to them when in my twenties, right? Well, the thing was if you don't act compliant there, they will beat the hell out of your clone and it hurts just like real life, right? And they can turn it up to the pain threshold on a remote control to have everything down. And people are scared to talk about this because of the lizard aspect. And the fact they can just keep cloning you and torturing you and torturing you and torturing you. New body, new body, new body. Because they make multiples of people. Some people are grown in the tank with deformities and they just scrap those and throw them in the chipper. But the other ones, they keep them for backup bodies until they wear out the first one. Sex wise, you know, I'm not trying to be vulgar or anything, but they do a lot of vulgar stuff there. They can also, if they apply a constant electronic current to your clone, you will have an aneurysm. If you're younger, it'll take a little bit longer with the electric current, but you will have an aneurysm. That's what happened to Tila Tequila. She doesn't wanna say that, though. The thing is, Tila Tequila was threatened not to talk about it. She was helping me for a minute. Are you familiar with Tila Tequila? Speaker 1: I've had her on the show, and in fact, I was just discussing her this morning with Like, tell James Wright who's exposing the Freemasons, and he said that he wanted to meet up with her and compare war stories and stuff like that. So I just introduced him this morning as it turns out. Speaker 0: Well, Teela has a clone running at the cloning center, and she has to well, she pretty much sold it out for her shot at love thing. She doesn't want me to discuss the nefarious deeds that she's done at the cloning station, including to me. And, well, I'm not really going to because that's her business and all. Right? But but well, I might discuss the stuff she did to me at a later date at a different show or something. It doesn't really matter right now. I'm trying to stick the important stuff. But she's there. She's making, like, hinty little posts about her she bounces to the fifth dimension. She used to think it was the fifth dimension. Should they tell people this? Right? Because they you open up your eyes there. You're like, where the hell am I? And you look at your hands, you're like, did you guys kidnapped me? That's what most people say. Am I kidnapped or something? How did I get here? Some people are drugged, so they think that it's a dream or they're in the astral or astral realm. That's what they tell people. Right? The spirit realm depends on who you are, where you're from. That's what they tell you. And people just believe it because it's like real. Right? Slap them in the face, it hurts and you don't wake up. So it's not a dream and man, it's not good. So anyway, there I wanted to not attend these clone gatherings and they were like, we'll bring you here if we want to. I was like, alright. Well, I'll tell all on you. And I'm doing it on my Facebook page. I don't have the link up here, but I you're on my Facebook page somewhere, I think. So I don't know if you have the link to show people or not. But yeah. I'm telling all about them, what they do there, and there's other stuff. Now they have these clone parties. Okay? That's oh, and also they get I'll just tell you flat out because they showed me. They call it the catalog. They get the school pictures from schools all over North America and they look at the cutest ones and they get the medical stuff from them and clone them and use them for sex slaves. Not with the without the parents' permission, and it doesn't really matter if they had permission or not. Right? You know? But this is what they do. I'm just telling you the severity of what they do there. Right? Like, I trust me. I am not a crackpot. Like, I and I don't get anything from this. I'm not writing a book or looking to write a book. I'm looking to crush these people. But the the problem is they're the richest and most powerful people in the world, and I'm just one person. Right? So You said you said Speaker 1: that they've got a facility. Do do you know where that facility is? Is there an address or a building? Or Speaker 0: Yes. The well, they're in deep bases. Right? Like, there's a Dulce or Dulce Base. It has an entire floor devoted to cloning. Okay? Now, it has it also has another floor devoted to gene splicing. You should see some of the stuff I've seen. Beaver, rats, all kinds of stuff. They're trying to make weapons for war and they showed me everything. They thought I was loyal. They started showing me everything. They told they totally thought I was loyal. Like, oh, my my ex family will not speak to me now. I said, I'm gonna expose this. You guys are gonna help me. And I said, we're not gonna help you. We'll get killed right along with you. And I said, well, I wanna do it alone. And I they said, don't ask us for help. I said, I'm sending people to you with the lie detector tests. Lie on it. Go to jail. And then they're looking around as clones saying we don't wanna lie on lie detector tests. Right? I said well, I'm welcoming all lie detector tests and we're we're gonna lie it up we're gonna line it up with the these lie detector tests and it's gonna get everything's gonna get proven. So have you taken have Speaker 1: you taken a lie detector test yet? Speaker 0: Not not yet. No. I haven't had one available. But the the thing is, it's so widespread, this corruption stuff. It's even bigger than what you truthers think that it is. It's a They have police and doctors and everything there loyal so that they can have clone sex with like a Britney Spears or an Angelica Joe Lee or something while they're sleeping because they're like, What are we doing when we're sleeping? It's a big waste of time. We can go there and have lots of fun. So, but it's terrible, diabolical, nefarious place. I've seen all kinds of stuff. Oh, the Picton murders up in Canada where with that guy that killed all the hookers. That was set up by them. They videotaped all the murders. They used to clone Picton into the place and had him running around talking to him and he felt like he was like a celebrity right anyway he used to smash them with a ball peen hammer Now I'll tell you who was there and this is how I know everything, okay? When I was five they brought me there to be used as what they call a diddle kid, okay? But all I'd do was cry. So they said, do you have any other kind of use? Do you sing or dance or something? So anyway, when I was five, to keep them off and I started singing like original songs there, just right out of the blue. Turns out, the first one, people liked it, and they had a famous person use it. And then they came back for more, I made more. And other people came back wanting to hear more. It was just a kid that was making these songs, right, for free because they never paid me. Nobody knew, right? Totally foolproof. So anyway, lots of people famous high profile people went there I'm kind of apprehensive to say even well, the people that know me know what I'm talking about but they're the highest profile people go to these cloning centers and they wanted to see this kid that was making these song. Well, Sheila Tequila started to come out and talk about them. She went on her radio blog shows. She said in the cloning centers and the things you guys do to children. But the thing is, well, they told her at the cloning center not to do it, not to help me. Because they're they're trying to play me off as a a joke that people will spoof it or make fun and say, they're cloning people. They don't have the technology yet. Well, they really do. I'll tell you right now all about it. You won't hear this from anybody else because they're all scared of dying, but they're not gonna kill me because I'll tell you why later and it's crazy. It's ridiculous.
Clonaid.com Pioneers in Human Cloning. The first human cloning company. clonaid.com
The1Parzival
Posted - June 14, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Saved - June 14, 2025 at 2:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the disturbing realities of X, formerly Twitter, where censorship and manipulation run rampant. I've uncovered horrific content hidden in hashtags, with the platform seemingly complicit in allowing predators to thrive. Despite having the technology to address these issues, X appears to prioritize profits over safety, creating a toxic environment. I can no longer support a platform that harbors such darkness, and I’m choosing to leave for Truth Social, where I believe these problems do not exist.

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

🧵 X The Digital Devil's Den 🧵 The place we call X, formally Twitter the Social Media Platform, is anything but that. What lies on the surface is the censorship, propaganda, grifts, scams, and lies, imposing psychological manipulation of the public. What's below is far worse! https://t.co/eaY4nlFiU5

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

As most probably already know, I shed light on some incredibly uncomfortable horrors that exist on X hidden casually in hashtags. These hashtags allowed predators to communicate and mass distribute amongest each other. To make matters worse X is completely aware and complict. https://t.co/v17bN7w0Jt

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

This disturbing material is not there by accident. It had ZERO Guardrails unlike what you see on the surface level of X's Moderation. Many posts are labeled by different categories and some are even given the sensitive content warning, however none of it was implemented here. https://t.co/0MX9CTkIUX

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

The lack of Guardrails in place and the fact it was so easily roaming free looks intentional rather than neglectful. They have the technology to remove all of this right now, but they do not, even when they know it exists. If that doesn't have you saying WTF, brace yourself. https://t.co/noUD4f42tp

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Many kept wondering why the algorithm was never changing regarding censorship. It's because this algorithm is not only used to just control narratives, but also to hide what's below. It's all part of the same system created by Twitter that's now doing the exact same thing. https://t.co/3wM7NX2xvy

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

It's safe to assume that this stuff has been going on for a very long time. This isn't some nightmare shadow part of internet that they tell people about. It is downloadable right from the app store, disguised as social media, and hidden right under your noses using hashtags. https://t.co/8FDMYE9Qtc

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If your not completely disgusted yet, well it gets worse. Notice how all your "Save the Children" Grifters have been silent. This is because X is their Gravy Train and they don't want to disrupt that. For them the money and the clout are more important, some even defending X. https://t.co/HcW1uaitHO

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

While you are reading this and others scroll their timeline oblivious to what is sitting right below the surface, these illegal activities continue. If anyone says these things cannot be combated they are completely ignorant. Truth Social has none of this grotesque content. https://t.co/SfIcgb3VOH

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Other social media platforms, not just X, have the capabilities to remove all of it too. This problem is likely much greater on larger platforms like Facebook who have also been scrutinized for similar reasons. They all seem to share the same business model, profits over kids. https://t.co/AicommM9k9

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Here's the thing though, it's not just about the profits, there has to be a more important reason not to remove it. I greatly suspect there are some high levels of blackmail going on which allow this to continue so blatantly. All of this can't possibly be true though, right? https://t.co/5SXNQq1tv1

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Let me remind of all the corrupt things they used social media for in the past like swaying elections, suspending a sitting President, censorship of information, psychological manipulation of the public, and getting rich doing all of that. They are very capable of all of this! https://t.co/f0J75j17g3

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Now X has swiftly implemented Xchat, not as a tool for your security, but as a tool of obscurity for these continued nefarious activities. Once they have their Xmoney implemented then then this place becomes a 1 stop shop for all types of criminal activity. A Virtual Cesspool! https://t.co/uK69ESg73b

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

X has quite literally become the Mark of the Beast not just by name, but by how it operates. You need to pay into the system through the Blue Check in order to make money in the System. You must then have certain numbers to show your commitment to being part of the System. https://t.co/Uvlp2pEsii

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If this whole thing isn't screaming out the big picture for you yet, let me make it simple. There exists a Digital Epstein Island below the surface level world on X and it's being funded by just you being on here. These dark corners must be scrubbed from existence forever. https://t.co/b3WnWkSzLV

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If social media platforms continue to go unpunished for this illegal activity happening on their platform, then the existence of it will remain for eternity. Are you willing to remain using this platform knowing what you know now? At what point are you willing draw the line?? https://t.co/IEGUb3IjVd

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

MAGA was willing to boycott Budlight because of Dylan Mulvaney, yet they won't boycott X for far worse. For me, I can no longer stay here in good conscience. The profound depths of evil things that exist on this platform is something I want no part of, so I must leave for good. https://t.co/wuM0dHS6oJ

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

I know I have shared a lot of uncomfortable truths with everyone over the last few years. Hopefully it has been enlightening for you. My work here is now done, but if you wish to continue the conversation, please join me on Truth Social where these terrible things do not exist. https://t.co/1qEvdoxycI

0rf
Posted - August 26, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Saved - August 27, 2025 at 9:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Five years ago, a significant smear campaign targeted Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17-year-old who volunteered to help during the Kenosha riots. Despite his actions being in self-defense, media outlets misrepresented the events, omitting crucial details and labeling him negatively. Big Tech platforms censored support for him, impacting public perception. After enduring extensive legal battles, he was acquitted, yet misinformation persisted, leading many to still view him unfavorably. I'm working on a documentary titled "Killing Kenosha" to explore these events further.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Five years ago, one of the most tyrannical smear and censorship campaigns in history was unleashed on a 17-year-old boy.🧵/1

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

After two nights of riots in Kenosha, WI, Kyle Rittenhouse volunteered to clean up the destruction and protect the immigrant Indian family business Car Source, whose car lots were burned the previous nights. He brought his lifeguard medical kit to provide first aid. /2

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Videos published that night clearly show KR being attacked. A gunshot is fired behind KR as he runs from a masked man lunging at him. KR shoots him. Then, KR is chased by a mob, hit in the head, kicked in the face, and hit with a skateboard before firing again in self-defense./3

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

But the media misinformed the masses. MSNBC's Kelly Clarkson cut out not only the jump-kick but the entire chase, describing the 17-year-old, who fell after running away and being hit in the head, as "a man sitting in the middle of the street waving a gun at people running by". /4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Just a warning, the footage you're about to see is disturbing. It shows a man sitting in the middle of the street waving a gun at people running by.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just a warning, the footage you're about to see is disturbing. It shows a man sitting in the middle of the street waving a gun at people running by.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

MSNBC's "The Beat with Ari Melber" also edited out crucial moments. His audience never saw KR kicked in the face and hit with the skateboard before shots rang out. "Now this will be paused before that actual shot. That's part of our standards," Melber told viewers. /5

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Without showing the video at all, MSNBC's "Morning Joe" described it to viewers as KR "just running around shooting and killing protesters". Over at CNN, Anderson Cooper described the "white teenager" as the attacker in "a shooting attack on protesters." /6

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Democracy Now's Amy Goodman spread the misinformation that KR was "shooting into a crowd," emphasizing that KR was a "white man". /7

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Some Fox News pundits also rushed to judgment. Chris Wallace said there was "no justification" for KR's self-defense, and Marie Harf repeatedly described KR as guilty of "murder", just two days after the shooting, over a year before trial. /8

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Vigilante justice is a completely inappropriate response to the rioting in the street. There is no justification for what happened in Kenosha. Obviously. And vigilante justice is a crime and and should be punished as a crime." "Obviously. In Kenosha this week, tragically, we saw a 17 year old, young man with an AR 15 walk into the protest and kill two protesters, murder them. Back to Kenosha, we have heard crickets from this White House on the right wing 17 year old man who murdered two protesters." The speakers frame the events as vigilante violence and criticize the White House's reaction to the Kenosha incident.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vigilante justice is a completely inappropriate response to the rioting in the street. There is no justification for what happened in Kenosha. Obviously. And vigilante justice is a crime and and should be punished as a crime. Speaker 1: Obviously. In Kenosha this week, tragically, we saw a 17 year old, young man with an AR 15 walk into the protest and kill two protesters, murder them. Back to Kenosha, we have heard crickets from this White House on the right wing 17 year old man who murdered two protesters.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

The next day, Facebook labeled KR a "mass murderer", affecting how the boy would be seen by billions —approx 35% of the world population. Facebook's CEO told CBS, "We spent a long time looking into this deeply, and we've designated him as a mass murderer." /9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three people were shot and two died of the 17 year old teenager. We've spent a long time looking into this deeply, and we've designated him as a mass murderer and have taken down all his accounts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Three people were shot and two died of the 17 year old teenager. We've spent a long time looking into this deeply, and we've designated him as a mass murderer and have taken down all his accounts.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

FB deleted KR's accounts and censored all search results for "Kyle Rittenhouse". The other Big Tech giants—the most trafficked sites in the world—also censored the public discourse, including Google, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Some of it continues to this day. /10

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Instagram removed comments sympathizing with KR when he cried on the stand as he recounted having his life threatened by a large man with a gun, being ambushed, running away, and eventually being forced to defend himself. /11

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Twitter censored the words "Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong," labeling the support for the 17-year-old who was attacked, "glorifying violence". Users were forced to delete these tweets to continue using Twitter. /12

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

TikTok removed even the most cordial discourse, accusing it of "harassment and bullying", like this clip from @brad_polumboWith /13

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Listen to this clip, Hannah, of what I said that was so dangerous and controversial. K. Keen Jeffries, a progressive congressman, literally tweeted, while the trial was going on, lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key. And he's the same guy that rails against mass incarceration, and I agree with him on some of it. But now, before the trial's even over, they're calling for this guy to be locked up and throw away the key. Like, they've already reached their conclusion. Speaker 1: No. Didn't give him a fair shake. Speaker 0: It's a very ... And they lied about it being a white supremacy thing when it's a white dude that shot three other white people. It's the entire thing is bizarre and it's Out of self defense. Speaker 1: Right. Yes. Speaker 0: In my opinion. Speaker 1: That's most important. Speaker 0: The truth is he defended himself; he wasn't some mass shooter white supremacist, and he should be acquitted. Do you feel bullied? Speaker 1: I I don't. And honestly, I think that was the most milquetoast explanation of everything that went down.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen to this clip, Hannah, of of what I said that was so dangerous and controversial. Take a listen. K. Keen Jeffries, a progressive congressman, literally tweeted, while the trial was going on, lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key. And he's the same guy that rails against mass incarceration, and I agree with him on some of it. But now, before the trial's even over, they're calling for this guy to be locked up and throw away the key. Like, they've already reached their conclusion. Speaker 1: No. Didn't give him a Speaker 0: fair shake. Speaker 1: It's a very Speaker 0: And they lied about it being a white supremacy thing when it's a white dude that shot three other white people. It's the entire thing is bizarre and it's Speaker 1: Out of self defense. Speaker 0: Right. Yes. Speaker 1: In my opinion. Speaker 0: That's most important. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And that's the thing that gets lost here is you don't have to either think he's a hero who did everything right and made amazing decisions or he's an evil white supremacist who should go to jail. The truth is Speaker 1: It's I would Speaker 0: never let my teenager go to a riot zone with a weapon. That was a bad decision to make. But in the moment he defended himself Correct. He wasn't some mass shooter white supremacist, and he should be acquitted. Do you feel bullied? Speaker 1: I I don't. And honestly, I think that was the most, like no offense, like, milquetoast explanation of, like, everything that went down.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Meanwhile, it was not considered bullying for the nation's most powerful lawmakers to call for KR's extrajudicial imprisonment and spread lies about him across the country. Lawmakers falsely accused KR of being a "white supremacist" and "terrorist". /14

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

As the online public discourse in KR's favor was systemically suppressed, the media continued to call him a murderer, ignoring key facts, and instead focusing on the utterly insignificant detail that KR "crossed state lines" as if it were a crime. /15

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kyle Rittenhouse was just 17 years old when he drove across state lines to Kenosha, Wisconsin. The teenager drove from his home in Illinois. Kyle Rittenhouse, who traveled across state lines. The 17 year old from out of state. The teenager traveled across state lines. Carl Rittenhouse traveled from his home in Illinois across the state line to Wisconsin. the 17 year old conveyed across state lines by mom. Rittenhouse's mother did not drive him to Kenosha. Rittenhouse's mother drove her son across state lines. My mama would never drive either one of us across state lines to go to a freaking riot. There are times where you can defend yourself. It's gonna vary from state to state when you can use force to defend your property, but you don't have a right in every state anywhere in the country to merely start you know, cross state lines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: August 24, Rittenhouse went up to the Kenosha area for his job as a lifeguard. Speaker 1: Rittenhouse crossed state lines into a community that was not his. Speaker 2: My grandmother, my aunt, my uncle, and cousins all live in the city of Kenosha. Speaker 1: You know, you've got this young white kid defending the community, that he's not even from. Speaker 2: What's your father's name? Michael Rittenhouse. He lived in Kenosha. Good evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. Kyle Rittenhouse was just 17 years old when he drove across state lines to Kenosha, Wisconsin. Speaker 3: The teenager drove from his home in Illinois. Speaker 4: Approximately one mile to Speaker 3: Across state lines, driving across state borders. He's driving across state lines. Speaker 1: Across the state line. Across state lines. Across state lines. Speaker 5: Across state lines. Speaker 3: If you look at the Rittenhouse case, he crossed state lines. Speaker 2: Drives up to to to events. Crossed state lines. Came across state lines. Speaker 4: Kyle Rittenhouse, who traveled across state lines. Speaker 2: From out of state, out of his own state. Came across state borders. Whenever you have a situation where a 17 year old is crossing state lines, Speaker 4: White teenager. He crosses a Speaker 5: state line, drives thirty minutes into Kenosha. Speaker 2: Remember, came across the line. Speaker 6: He crossed state lines. Speaker 3: Crossed state lines. Speaker 4: Across state lines. He crossed state lines. Speaker 2: Kyle Rittenhouse, who crossed state lines. Speaker 4: Came across. Across state lines. Speaker 7: Cross state Speaker 2: lines. He. Went across state lines. Cross state lines. Speaker 7: Cross state lines. Cross state lines. Speaker 2: A 17 year old kid from out of state. He makes Out of state. All Cross state lines. Cross state lines. Cross state lines. Across state lines. Cross state lines. Went over state lines. Drove across state state lines. He drove across state had his mother drive him across state lines from out of state. Speaker 4: Say the line, Bart. Speaker 7: The teenager traveled across state lines. Carl Rittenhouse traveled from his home in Illinois across the state line to Wisconsin. Speaker 3: Drove to a different state. Speaker 2: Drives up to the state. Again, Speaker 3: drove across state lines. Speaker 6: The state that he does not live in. He traveled there from out of state. He crossed state lines. Meaning, he traveled across state lines. The 17 year old who crossed state lines. Now, again, he drove from Illinois to Wisconsin. The 17 year old from out of state who shows up to Kenosha, Wisconsin. He drove from Illinois to Kenosha, Wisconsin. Kyle Rittenhouse, who again traveled across state lines in a state that he doesn't even live in. He crossed state lines. He drove across state lines. Speaker 2: We know that Kyle Rittenhouse traveled across state lines, to go to Kenosha, and he murdered two protesters. Speaker 4: Willing to drive across state lines to commit murder. Speaker 5: And did anyone help him cross state lines? Speaker 3: His mama drove him across state lines. Speaker 4: Rittenhouse's mother did not drive him to Kenosha. Rittenhouse's mother drove her son across state lines. Speaker 5: And look at Rittenhouse, who was driven by his mother across state lines. Frankly, she should have been detained for child endangerment. Speaker 7: My mama would never drive either one of us across state lines to go to a freaking riot. Speaker 2: Yeah. This 17 year old conveyed across state lines by mom. Rittenhouse in Kenosha, allowing his mom to take him across state lines across state lines. Speaker 3: Across state lines. Yeah. Look. Yeah. We have a system of laws in the country. There are times where you can defend yourself. It's gonna vary from state to state when you can use force to defend your property, but you don't have a right in every state anywhere in the country to merely start you know, cross state lines. Say Speaker 4: the line, Bart.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

When Senate candidate @JoshMandelOhio shared a meme mocking the incessantly repeated "crossed state lines" character attack, Facebook censored his post and threatened to delete his entire account. /16

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

FB also censored video creator Mark Dice for sharing a non-graphic video of KR offering medical care to an injured protester. Although KR was not a certified EMT, he was a certified lifeguard with additional medical training and bandaged the protester's injured foot. /17

Video Transcript AI Summary
Facebook took down a video I posted showing Kyle Rittenhouse helping one of the protesters in Kenosha that night after she was struck in the foot with a projectile, and that he had his first aid kit with him to show he did not go to the city to cause trouble or attack protesters. I didn't glorify, celebrate, or praise him; I simply showed a video and explained what it showed. They sent a notice stating they don't allow symbols, praise, or support of dangerous individuals or organizations, defined as terrorist activity, organized hate or violence, mass or serial murder, human trafficking or criminal or harmful activity. My page has over 800,000 followers. In the week, it reached almost 6,000,000 people. They gave me a community guidelines strike, took the post down, and restricted the page's reach because I violated the terms three times in ninety days, so they say.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Facebook took down this video that I posted showing Kyle Rittenhouse helping one of the protesters in Kenosha on the night of the incident after she was struck in the foot with a projectile and that he had his first aid kit with him to show that he did not go to the city, like the mainstream media says, to cause trouble or to go and attack the protesters. I didn't glorify, celebrate, or praise him. I simply showed a non graphic video and explained in very plain terms exactly what the video showed. They gave me this wonderful notice saying that they don't allow symbols, praise, or support of dangerous individuals or organizations, and they define those things as terrorist activity, organized hate or violence, mass or serial murder, human trafficking or criminal or harmful activity. My page has over 800,000 people following it. In the last week alone, it reached almost 6,000,000 people. And so, not only did they give me a community guidelines strike and take the post down, but they also restricted the page's reach because I violated the terms three times in ninety days, so they say.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

GoFundMe shut down KR's campaign to raise money for bail and legal defense. Both FB & Twitter censored users who shared other links to donate, including KR's own lawyer and mother. When KR’s mom shared a link to donate to, Twitter disabled the retweet button. /18

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Discover, one of the world's largest payment companies, blocked donations to KR's GiveSendGo fundraiser. Discover did this without public announcement, but confirmed its actions after an internal email leaked. /19

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

When KR's family attempted to raise defense funds by selling "Free Kyle" t-shirts, the printing platform terminated the online store because they said KR's case was "controversial" and "complex". /20

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Shopify, the largest e-commerce platform in the world, also banned the sale of KR shirts, which were being sold to raise KR defense funds. /21

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

To this day (even after KR's acquittal), Google, Yahoo, Duck Duck Go, and Bing ban searches for Kyle Rittenhouse merch in their marketplaces. Yet they allow searches for merchandise of convicted serial killers and actual mass murderers, like Jeffrey Dahmer. /22

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Miraculously, after 87 days behind bars, KR raised enough funds to pay the $2 million bail. Then, after enduring over a year's worth of smears and censorship, he would successfully defend himself again—this time in the courtroom. A jury acquitted him of all charges. /23

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: As the first count of the information, Joseph Rosenbaum, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the second count of the information, Richard McGinnis, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the third count of the information, unknown male, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the fourth count of the information, Anthony Huber, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the fifth count of the information, Gage Grosskreutz, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. Speaker 1: Members of jury, these your unanimous verdicts. Is there anyone who does not agree with the verdict as read? No. You wish the jury pulled?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the first count of the information, Joseph Rosenbaum, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the second count of the information, Richard McGinnis, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the third count of the information, unknown male, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the fourth count of the information, Anthony Huber, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. As to the fifth count of the information, Gage Grosskreutz, we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle h Rittenhouse, not guilty. Speaker 1: Members of jury, these your unanimous verdicts. Is there anyone who does not agree with the verdict as read? No. You wish the jury pulled?

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Despite the overwhelming exculpatory evidence that led to his acquittal, the censorship had a huge impact on public opinion. Nearly half the population was thoroughly convinced that KR is a murderous monster. /24

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Full story at http://Orf.Report! /25 Please support my feature-length documentary, "Killing Kenosha" GiveSendGo.com/KillingKenosha…

Matt Orfalea | Substack Accidental journalist and video creator substack.com

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

The boy was not “white supremacist”. The black man was not “unarmed”. False narratives inflamed an American city for three violent nights. New trailer for the definitive documentary on the Kenosha riots, "Killing Kenosha". https://t.co/7ZEElYtVet

Video Transcript AI Summary
The following story contains graphic footage of violence. A white gunman opened fire Tuesday night on people protesting the police shooting of unarmed black man Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The attack was carried out by a teenage white vigilante. Somebody white male. The white boy. White supremacist. Terrorist. He murdered protesters. I didn't do anything wrong. I defended myself. What we saw is white male privilege and white male entitlement. That white supremacist patriarchy. A system of white supremacy. The only reason why any of this is allowed is because of the whiteness of it all. Very white nationalist. White vigilante. White fear. White privilege. I didn't wanna have to kill anybody that night. Oh, baloney. White tears. I have nightmares every night. And what is the nightmare? It's just reliving the events of what happened. These are scenes playing out in a small city in America's Midwest.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This Speaker 1: dude run and did it. Well, we're gonna begin with a warning to our audience. The following story contains graphic footage of violence. A white gunman opened fire Tuesday night on people protesting the police shooting of unarmed black man Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Speaker 0: The attack was carried out by a teenage white vigilante. Somebody white male. The white boy. White supremacist. Terrorist. He murdered protesters. Opening fire on protesters. For murder. That murderous attack. The white supremacist attack. I didn't do anything wrong. I defended myself. What we saw is white male privilege and white male entitlement. Speaker 1: That white supremacist patriarchy. A system of white supremacy. Speaker 0: A prism of whiteness. There is a delusion at the heart of whiteness that is driving this violence. White violence. He's accused of being a white nationalist terrorist. Speaker 1: He Gunned down Black Lives Matter protesters. It's a mass murder. This little murderous white supremacist. The only reason why Speaker 0: any of this is allowed is because of the whiteness of it all. Very white nationalist. White vigilante. White fear. White privilege. I didn't wanna have Speaker 1: to kill anybody that night. Oh, baloney. Speaker 0: This Brad's tears. White tears. Tears. Male white tears. Those grundantile tears. White tears. Speaker 1: White male tears. That acting job of the crying, Speaker 0: I can't even look at it. That is one of the worst acting jobs I've ever seen. Speaker 1: They attacked me. Speaker 0: This is white privilege. The epitome of white privilege. Speaker 1: I have nightmares every night. And what is the nightmare? Speaker 0: It's just reliving the events of what happened. These are scenes playing out in a small city in America's Midwest.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

@MrDylanKrug Wow, what I photo. You take that yourself? I'd love to see whatever else was recorded by this photographer. I'm making a feature-length doc. https://t.co/zEX8ImEg7N

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

Please DM me if you have any photos/videos in Kenosha between Aug. 23 and Aug. 26, 2020. I'm making a film entirely from images and sound recorded in Kenosha during that period. Any help is hugely appreciated🙏 https://www.givesendgo.com/KillingKenoshaFilm

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

@PaulGaier1 It wasn’t just your Canadian coworker. It was all over the mainstream media in the US too. https://t.co/sNeNrRtAhh

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

The "whiteness" of it all https://t.co/j0TXj9ZJJg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Warning: the following story contains graphic footage. A white gunman opened fire Tuesday night on people protesting the police shooting of unarmed Black man Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The attack was carried out by a teenage white vigilante. The shooter is described as a white supremacist, terrorist, and white nationalist. He murdered protesters. "I didn't do anything wrong. I defended myself." The speakers cite "white privilege" and "white male entitlement" as motives, calling it "the white supremacist patriarchy" and "a system of white supremacy." They describe "This little murderous white supremacist" and label it "mass murder." Phrases include "White vigilante," "White fear," "White privilege," "I didn't wanna have to kill anybody that night," and "White tears" with "White male tears." The piece ends: "These are scenes playing out in a small city in America's Midwest."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This Speaker 1: dude run and did it. Well, we're gonna begin with a warning to our audience. The following story contains graphic footage of violence. A white gunman opened fire Tuesday night on people protesting the police shooting of unarmed black man Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Speaker 0: The attack was carried out by a teenage white vigilante. Somebody white male. The white boy. White supremacist. Terrorist. He murdered protesters. Opening fire on protesters. For murder. That murderous attack. The white supremacist attack. I didn't do anything wrong. I defended myself. What we saw is white male privilege and white male entitlement. Speaker 1: That white supremacist patriarchy. A system of white supremacy. Speaker 0: A prism of whiteness. There is a delusion at the heart of whiteness that is driving this violence. White violence. He's accused of being a white nationalist terrorist. Speaker 1: He Gunned down Black Lives Matter protesters. It's a mass murder. Speaker 0: This little murderous white supremacist. The only reason why any of this is allowed is because of the whiteness of it all. Very white nationalist. White vigilante. White fear. White privilege. I didn't wanna have Speaker 1: to kill anybody that night. Oh, baloney. Speaker 0: This Brad's tears. White tears. Tears. Speaker 1: Male white tears. Speaker 0: Those grundantile tears. White tears. Speaker 1: White male tears. That acting job of the crying, Speaker 0: I can't even look at it. That is one of the worst acting jobs I've ever seen. Speaker 1: They attacked me. Speaker 0: This is white privilege. The epitome of white privilege. Speaker 1: I have nightmares every night. And what is the nightmare? Speaker 0: It's just reliving the events of what happened. These are scenes playing out in a small city in America's Midwest.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

@mazemoore 🙏

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

@CaplingerMi I know this is a joke but he didn't fire into a crowd. Huber didn't beat women as far as I know. But he did strangle and threaten his brother with a knife. And calling Grosskreutz a "career criminal" is a giant stretch.

@0rf - Matt Orfalea

@pmcall Or "Making a Murderer"

ShaykhSulaiman
Posted - October 18, 2025 at 9:46 PM
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 5:36 PM

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

I quoted @LauraLoomer. She said all Muslims, I specified it to Jewish Zionists. My posts was determined to be ‘Hateful Conduct’ Two Tier System https://t.co/3zkiivzHYg

tracybeanz
Posted - September 9, 2023 at 2:20 PM
Saved - September 9, 2023 at 9:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a monumental civil rights case, a district court ruled in favor of plaintiffs who alleged that the government coerced social media companies to censor speech. The court found evidence of government interference, including requests to remove posts and pressure to change moderation policies. The CDC, FBI, and other agencies were implicated. The court affirmed ongoing harm and self-censorship, setting a precedent. Plaintiffs have standing, and the injunction was granted. The government's appeal is paused for 10 days. This case exposes the government's infringement on free speech.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This case was filed last May by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with private plaintiffs, against numerous agencies in the federal government. Plaintiffs alleged that the government (including the FBI, White House, Surgeon General, CISA, among many others) were forcing social media companies to censor speech by threat.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This case was filed last May by the states of Missouri and Louisiana, along with private plaintiffs, against numerous agencies in the federal government. Plaintiffs alleged that the government (including the FBI, White House, Surgeon General, CISA, among many others) were forcing social media companies to censor speech by threat.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The Plaintiffs wanted a temporary injunction to STOP this activity as their case moved to trial. Judge Terry Doughty granted them expedited limited discovery and deposition to get the information they needed to prove a temporary injunction was warranted.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Of course, the government fought this the entire way, but ultimately were widely unsuccessful. The information plaintiffs received was absolutely mind blowing. For certain the government was coercing social media companies to censorship— the discovery proved that beyond a shadow of a doubt.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

It came time for a hearing on the injunction, and I traveled to Louisiana for that hearing. It was 8 hours long, and absolutely damning for the government. If you see the post I placed in the first post in this thread, you can scroll down and read all about it.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Since that hearing, I have been honored to do several spaces with @ThaWoodChipper, who also understands the importance of this monumental civil rights case. It is the most important civil rights case in the modern era, hands down. We waited patiently for the ruling… And on July 4th, we got it.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

On July 4th, the district court under an absolutely AMAZING judge in Terry Doughty, ruled in FAVOR of the Plaintiffs. Here is where you need to pay attention. Everything this judge wrote in his ruling is a PROVEN FACT in a court of law. In a 155 page ruling, the judge METICULOUSLY dissected the record and rendered a judgement.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I threaded this ruling when it happened, and you can find it on my “highlights” page - but I want to make something clear; the fact set the judge is relying on here came from EXTREMELY limited discovery and deposition from ONLY the government Defendants.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

So, the ruling was for a temporary injunction to STOP the government from the following while carving out some exceptions for them, AS THE REST OF THE CASE PROGRESSED THROUGH DISCOVERY AND TO TRIAL. Read this very carefully.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This list is going to be very important as we move forward through this thread, so please bookmark this for reference moving forward. So, the government obviously appealed this to the 5th circuit. The court heard the appeal in an expedited fashion (for them) and yesterday, THEIR opinion was filed.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

It is hard to completely rehash all of the reporting I have done over the past year and some months in a short update, but basically the government argued that they weren’t threatening anyone ever and everything we got in discovery was nonsense and misinterpreted, and the 3 judge panel of the court of appeals had to listen to that, while reviewing the DETAILED fact set the judge had ruled on in the order for the injunction.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

So, quickly, what we are about to go through is the 5th circuits decision on whether or not to UPHOLD the ruling that Judge Doughty made barring the government agencies listed from the actions listed above in the 4 set screenshot, or to REVERSE that ruling. It isn’t about the entire case— ONLY the temporary injunction.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I am probably 70/30 on how this panned out, but the details are important. The government asked that if the court should rule against them, they put a stay (pause) on the order for 10 days so that they could appeal it to the SCOTUS. The 5th did that, so the ruling they just laid down is PAUSED for 10 more days while the government attempts to write to the SCOTUS convincing them that they SHOULD be able to force social media companies to censor you. Chew on that for a minute.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Also, in the interim while we waited for this decision, I had the honor of interviewing both @AGAndrewBailey from Missouri, and @AGJeffLandry from Louisiana. Both are WONDERFUL examples of what you want in a state Attorney General. For links, see: Andrew Bailey: https://rumble.com/v342ndn-dark-to-light-missouri-attorney-general-andrew-bailey.html Jeff Landry: https://rumble.com/v36i7oh-dark-to-light-missouri-v.-biden-and-ag-jeff-landry.html

Dark to Light: Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey Today's show is information packed. We start with a dissection of the new indictments against President Trump, and we move into the Missouri v. Biden case, which sadly dovetails with the indictments. rumble.com
Dark to Light: Missouri v. Biden and AG Jeff Landry Get your Gold IRA FREE investor guide today! Click below: https://www.patriotgoldgroup.com/download/ira-investor-guide-cp.html We had a REALLY great show today, starting off with a touching song and a rumble.com

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

@AGAndrewBailey @AGJeffLandry We are about to travel through 74 pages together.. Grab coffee, whatever, and off we go. Here is the link to the decision, and here is a summary of what we are about to dissect as best we can. LINK: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca5.214640/gov.uscourts.ca5.214640.238.1.pdf

Published Opinion – #238, Att. #1 in State of Missouri v. Biden (5th Cir., 23-30445) – CourtListener.com PUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [23-30445 Affirmed in Part] Judge: EBC, Judge: JWE, Judge: DRW. Mandate issue date is 10/31/2023; denying Motion for stay pending appeal filed by Appellants Mr. Xavier Becerra, Mr. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Mr. Vivek H. Murthy, Department of Health & Human Services and Mr. Anthony Fauci [11] [23-30445] (CCR) [Entered: 09/08/2023 04:36 PM] courtlistener.com

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

So, the court agrees the government is guilty of what is alleged, but not for ALL of the officials that Judge Doughty did. Remember, everything is based on the limited discovery they were able to receive, but I wholeheartedly disagree with this, and we will go through the reasons why. Still, the fact this was affirmed AT ALL is a massive, massive win.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

@AGAndrewBailey @AGJeffLandry They summarized much more concisely than I ever could… https://t.co/mOVcbQlst9

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

1. The White House and Surgeon General - taken together Here the appeals court affirms that the WH and SG requested social media companies remove posts and pressured them to do so. It also affirms that they also monitored the platforms moderation activities, demanded information from them about their policies, “Always, the officials asked for more data and stronger interventions” said the 5th.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

From the beginning the platforms cooperated - even creating special tools, but as officials began to demand more from them, the platforms worked to “appease” government officials, “eager” to stay in their good graces. https://t.co/JRstpgWUIH

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Remember, everything in this decision REAFFIRMS a fact pattern. Here the 5th affirms that the WH and SG attempted to interfere with the platforms own POLICY creation. This is so important. The government can not do this. https://t.co/Xs82GI5HzO

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Here the court affirms that platforms changed their moderation policy after instruction from the government… Tsk Tsk “…they also changed their moderation policies expressly in accordance with the officials’ wishes…” https://t.co/k1bN5Pxz11

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

As an aside, I don’t want to hear ONE PERSON come at any of us who have been saying this for years and say it is “misinformation” any longer. This is now affirmed both in congress and in two courts - a district court and the court of appeals of the United States. @krassenstein and @EdKrassen argued with me in a space once that this is all totally untrue. I hope they will revise their positions. I wont hold my breath.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The discovery proved that the changes many of the platforms enacted coincided closely with meeting between the WH and SG and the platforms. And even when they didn’t adopt the changes, they censored content that DID NOT BREAK their terms of service after that content was flagged by the government.. Again, marinate on it…

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

@krassenstein At the same time as they were demoting normal Americans, the social media platforms capitulated to government demands to “amplify” (inorganically) the governments “approved” narrative, specifically in this case when it pertained to vaccines for COVID. https://t.co/asT2LPmGow

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I want everyone to think about the above for a moment. They were forcing inorganic amplification so people would be fooled into thinking the vaccine was “safe and effective” when one of them was REMOVED because it wasn’t. The sheer evil behind the obvious is unbelievable.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Even with all of that, the ministry of truth wasn’t happy, scolding platforms for not doing enough, and trying to coerce them to do more. All of this to get that needle in your arm, consequences be damned… https://t.co/u1Ws27lq1M

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And here the court details the infamous press conference, where Jen Psaki and Vivek Murthy *expressly threatened* the platforms from the bully pulpit, even singling out certain accounts.. This was the ultimate in authoritarianism, and the 5th circuit agrees. https://t.co/pfuKR2Dl6a

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

“The platforms responded with total compliance. Their answer was four-fold.” The social media companies responded with child like obedience to daddy government. You can’t make this up. https://t.co/7KdEbIZtoF

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

They changed their internal policies in response to the presser… https://t.co/6mUxhGE6FP

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

They removed speakers (like the so called “disinfo dozen” that they HAD NOT BEEN targeting BEFORE the press conference, and they continued to inorganically amplify the government’s content. https://t.co/CoBxeDgV0A

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Even this wasn’t enough for the ministry of truth. They continued their public threats, invoking Section 230 protection as a cudgel for MORE action, and using the office of the President as a backbone for that threat. https://t.co/lSVh0dUC71

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

“Next, we turn to the CDC” says the 5th panel. They behaved much like the White House and Surgeon General. They flagged posts with supposed “misinformation” and actively sought to promote its “official” position over others. They also provided direct guidance to the platforms on the application of their internal policy and moderation activities.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

They had BOLO (Be on the Lookout) meetings on “misinformation” hot topics. They asked for moderation changes, and they OUTRIGHT DIRECTED platforms to take certain actions. Direct violation of the constitution. Platforms began relying on the CDC to “Debunk” posts it wasn’t sure about.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And now, the good ol’ FBI. They regularly met with platforms, at least since the 2020 election. They shared “Strategic information” to alert them to “misinformation” trends in the lead up to the elections. https://t.co/yvtGq79TMf

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Per their operations, the FBI monitored platforms moderation policies and asked for “detailed assessments” during regular meetings. Some platforms changed their TOS to be able to comply with the FBI. While the government boasted that *only* 50% of the domestic (I repeat - DOMESTIC) content they wanted to remove was removed, the court didn’t find that so beneficial for them.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This is going to be the part where my disappointment comes in…But, again, this isn’t the CASE decision, its the decision on the injunction only.. They talk about NIAID, CISA, and the State Department. NIAID and Fauci didn’t have regular contact with platforms or flag, they mainly appeared on Live Streams and podcasts and had those amplified. CISA and the SD directly engaged with the platforms and discussed the tools and techniques that foreign influence actors would use.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The State Department didn’t flag content, but CISA did, acting as an intermediary for third party groups and then “switch boarding” based off of the EIP and CIS. The officials actions “apparently led to content being removed or demoted by the recipient platforms” https://t.co/KuNQmkYwuW

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Relying on the fact set above, the district court concluded that the officials coerced platforms to remove content and change their moderation policies, and therefore were likely to succeed on the merits, granting the injunction. https://t.co/3vpLFQuWg7

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

LEGAL THEORY: On standing - Any ONE plaintiff that demonstrates ongoing harm or continued injury is enough to pass the standing argument, a fact that was argued eloquently by the Plaintiff attorney in court. https://t.co/1CGDLZqSRK

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The government is arguing that Plaintiffs dont have standing because they can’t prove a FUTURE injury. Here the court goes over their PAST injury. But the court doesn’t agree with the government. They believe there is ongoing injury and there will be future injury as well. https://t.co/Gfmm96ScvQ

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

I want to stop for a second (again) and go over how monumental this actually is. This is the first time ever that a normal “user” or American has submitted evidence of social media censorship and had their concerns ADDRESSED at all by a COURT OF LAW.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Another HUGE precedent set here - the past chilling of their speech has caused individuals to SELF CENSOR. That is considered ongoing harm. This is a massive and very important section. https://t.co/vfa8NBIywk

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

“As the Supreme Court has recognized, this chilling of the Individual Plaintiffs exercise of their First Amendment Rights, is, itself, a constitutionally sufficient injury.” They rule that the fears motivating the self censorship aren’t hypothetical, and come from very real censorship injuries they have previously suffered… Legal Eagles, affirm for me the importance of JUST this paragraph.. Amazing.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The government had tried to argue that ongoing harms were not going to occur because, for example, Twitter had “stopped” enforcing its COVID misinformation policy. But the court disagrees, saying that they have been censored for views well beyond COVID. Continued next— very important.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Here is something ANYONE who is considering any sort of lawsuit needs to consider. The court here aptly notes that plaintiffs aren’t suing the platforms over their TOS, they are suing to stop the GOVERNMENT from interfering with platforms. Also - the government admitted in oral argument that they are STILL in contact with these platforms today. TLDR; the court doesn’t trust that the government isn’t still forcing social media companies to censor..

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

This is GRAND. The government argued that because the users had been REINSTATED, all is well. The court rightly says no. The fact that they WERE REINSTATED is what causes the threat of ongoing harm. If they didn’t have an account, they wouldn’t have to worry about censorship— they wouldn’t be able to post. Masterful.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The first standing hurdle, crossed and landed for Plaintiffs. This means any chance of appeal on standing to SCOTUS is likely a failure. The government had argued this standing issue over, and over, and over and have been shot down every single time. Now that is reinforced yet again. This case isn’t going ANYWHERE.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The Plaintiffs had to show that their injuries were traceable to conduct of the government. Government argued that since the content moderation policies were in place in the Trump administration, and also because moderation decisions were made independently by the social media companies. They had no standing. However, the plaintiffs aren’t challenging the policies themselves, but whether they can be traced back to government actors. The appeals court agrees with the district court that yes, they can be.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Even though there were instances where social media companies declined to censor, the Plaintiffs only have to show the likelihood they would comply, not certainty. The logical conclusion is that they would, based on the preliminary discovery they received.. https://t.co/iBBr8Z4vGw

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And I want to again stress, this was LIMITED discovery. The judge in the district court had made it a point in an order to let the government know that this was a mere scintilla of what would be required for production moving forward. So position this for yourselves - all of this is coming from an EXTREMELY limited production of evidence, which will now broaden to include more officials, more agency heads, more PRIVATE companies, like Facebook, Google, and X, that will be subpoenaed and deposed for evidence at trial.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Next on standing, the Plaintiffs had to prove that their injuries could be redressed by a favorable decision on the injunction. https://t.co/yr5tIK2Usd

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Again, key here is that the Plaintiffs aren’t challenging the social media companies policies themselves, rather they asked for the government from being restrained from unlawfully interfering with their independent application of those policies. https://t.co/kut8vbUl2L

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And IMPORTANTLY, the government had argued that the state plaintiffs didn’t have standing. That goes right down the trash shoot here, and it is a BIG deal. States were censored by platforms. This court determines they have standing as well. https://t.co/CSJYbS0iVE

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And an interesting little tidbit here. Other state officials have experienced censorship as well, so this isn’t limited to just Missouri and Louisiana. https://t.co/lLRibdfomG

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

And next, a very important part of the 1st Amendment that often goes undiscussed. THE RIGHT TO LISTEN. Constituent plaintiffs were harmed by the censorship of their elected representatives, and the elected representatives and states are harmed WHEN THEY CAN NOT HEAR their constituents. This was discussed at length in my interview with @AGJeffLandry

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The appeals court rules that Plaintiffs have standing - finally putting that issue to bed (hopefully) and also the court makes sure to include that even the CDC admitted the need to “hear” citizens. It may be for a different reason for them, but if you think about it - if the government couldn’t “hear” what we are all saying, they wouldn’t know what narrative they needed to craft to counter the truth… Goes both ways. NEXT!

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

There is a high bar to hit to even be granted an injunction. You must meet four criteria, as detailed below. 1. You are likely to succeed on the merits of your case. 2. There is a “substantial threat that you will suffer “irreparable injury” without it. 3. The injury you could sustain outweighs whatever “harm” the injunction could cause the other side 4. An injunction doesn’t disserve the public interest.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

FRAME THIS. “The Plaintiffs allege that federal officials ran afoul of the First Amendment by coercing and significantly encouraging social media platforms to censor disfavored speech, including by threats of adverse government action like antitrust enforcement and legal reforms. WE AGREE”

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

The government CAN NOT abridge free speech. Private parties are not normally constrained by the first amendment. Again, the importance of this can not be understated. We are here because they government acted through threats to social media companies to censor “disfavored” viewpoints. Every case against a social media company for their TOS or their censorship moves has failed because Plaintiffs have targeted the social media company rather than the government. One exception I know of off the top of my head is the Berenson case, and he settled.

@tracybeanz - Tracy Beanz

Took a quick pause for my carnivore lunch. Back in a moment.

View Full Interactive Feed