reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

We looked thru the recent history of Judge Tanya Chutkan, who presides over Trump's DC criminal case. Our findings? She's treating Trump worse than other defendants - including a meth dealer. Let me show you how...

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

This past week, Judge Chutkan gave Trump’s team one business day to respond to Special Counsel’s protective order (PO). The Court's local rules allow for 14 days to respond. Trump's team asked for more time, citing due process concerns. She denied their requested extension https://t.co/1yAS5u6U4y

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

Judge Chutkan also set a hearing on the PO for Aug 11 - Just one week after the PO was submitted, in a case involving millions of pages of documents and hundreds of witnesses. She denied Trump's request for a hearing date where both his lawyers could be president. https://t.co/1VCSLxt5CX

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

This unfairly quick timeline is inconsistent with how Judge Chutkan has treated other defendants. In the Maria Butina case, Chutkan gave Butina 1 week to respond to a PO and set the hearing a month out. https://t.co/TUShPlFhES

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

In the case of a DC meth dealer, Judge Chutkan gave a 1-week deadline to respond to the PO. She also set the hearing 2 weeks out after it was submitted. https://t.co/UBM49VVidi

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

And for a J6 defendant - Judge Chutkan gave a 1-week response deadline and set the PO hearing a month out. https://t.co/R9iQXHlWny

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

Important to note that none of those cases involved the issue looming over the Trump case - A court's limitations on a presidential candidate's ability to defend himself publicly.

@Techno_Fog - Techno Fog

Such issues should be briefed thoroughly - Judge Chutkan denied Trump that right, contrary to her history. You want evidence of bias? There it is.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸TRILLION-DOLLAR FREEZE: TRUMP HITS PAUSE ON ALL FEDERAL FUNDING In a sweeping move, the White House just ordered every federal agency to stop all grants and loans - effective tomorrow at 5pm. White House Office of Management and Budget acting director Matthew Vaeth: "Career appointees have a duty to align Federal spending with Presidential priorities" The pause impacts everything from foreign aid to domestic programs, while the administration reviews where taxpayer money should go. Source: CNN @sentdefender

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

The same DC judges who tormented J6ers and denounced the president's pardons now will form the first line of defense against Trump adm policies. Judge Lamberth--one of the cruelest and most outspoken DC judges, appointed by Reagan--just entered a temp restraining order related to Trump's executive order on transgender inmates. Lamberth--who held nonviolent offenders under pretrial detention and imposed excessive sentences on J6ers including women--claims the exec order violates the 8A rights of the men pretending to be women. I bet people like @Iamrachelpowell are very interested in Lamberth's new found compassion.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

More from Lamberth--who needs to be forced from the bench. Just stunning but typical garbage from Lamberth. It is NOT in the public interest to stop paying for hormone therapy for criminals?? This has nothing to do with anything except defying President Trump. https://t.co/2AmJKTLHrI

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: California Attorney General Rob Bonta told a hospital to ignore Trump’s EO and continue providing puberty blockers and sex change surgery to minors or they will be in violation of discrimination laws. https://t.co/akVqWaYJmI

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

For four years, these same DC judges routinely lamented attempts to “overthrow democracy” on Jan 6. Now these same unelected judges are defying the will of a president who won at least 77 million votes to protect unelected nameless bureaucrats.

@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney

JUST IN: Judge Amy Berman Jackson becomes the 5th judge *today* to block an aspect of Trump's early-term orders, this time the firing of ethics watchdog Hampton Dellinger. And night isn't over. yet ... https://t.co/dUaxwZeOmq

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨 🇺🇸 ACTIVIST JUDGE WHO BLOCKED TRUMP'S SPENDING FREEZE HAS HIDDEN MONEY TIES Federal Judge John McConnell failed to disclose his role at Crossroads Rhode Island while ruling against Trump's spending freeze. His non-profit received $128M in government funding during his 18-year board tenure, including $42M from 2020-2023. Rhode Island, a plaintiff in the case, already sent his organization $2.9M in 2025. The judge ordered federal funds to keep flowing to states—and coincidentally, to his own non-profit. Federal law requires judges to recuse themselves when their impartiality might be questioned. Wonder why he didn't. Source: @America1stLegal

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️ https://t.co/mDEBDxd5hX

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The world will be better for this

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: President Trump and DOGE can now DISMANTLE USAID, a federal judge has just ruled The gravy train is OVER! 🔥 https://t.co/5Z2NLe0BeL

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

39-year-old Canadian-born Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, the first Muslim and Arab DC judge, clerked on the Supreme Court of Canada and later led a radical leftwing group that called for defunding the police. In the lame-duck session after Democrats lost the White House and Senate on November 5, 2024, Senate Democrats confirmed Ali on November 20 with a vote of 50-49.

@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney

NEW: A federal judge gave the Trump administration about 36 hours to pay out hundreds millions of dollars for work performed by foreign aid contractors — and is demanding details about potential defiance of his orders. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/25/foreign-aid-funding-state-department-022736

Judge warns Trump administration to comply with court order on foreign aid payments U.S. District Judge Amir Ali grew impatient during a hearing with a lack of clear responses from the administration’s lawyers. politico.com

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

BREAKING: The US Supreme Court just denied President Trump‘s bid to cancel $2 billion in USAID spending in a 5-4 vote. So basically SCOTUS is over ruling Trump to pay out foreign aid. Roberts & Barrett sided with Democrat appointed justices. Trump appointed Barrett. https://t.co/vhiZzIQhi5

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama judge has ordered Trump to restart USAID functions claiming, without evidence, that acting USAID Director Marco Rubio didn't have authority to layoff staff and redirect the agencies efforts. He argued that scaling back the agency was unconstitutional.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — AFL is investigating why Judge John McConnell was selected to preside over the lawsuit challenging President Trump’s spending freeze — despite his public opposition to the President and long-time ties to a group that now stands to receive millions after his ruling.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 On January 28, 2025, the District of Columbia and 22 states, including Rhode Island, sued the Trump Administration over President Trump’s temporary spending freeze.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 This lawsuit could have been brought in any number of jurisdictions — but it was filed in Rhode Island and assigned to Judge McConnell. The question is, why?

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 Judge McConnell has a long history of anti-Trump rhetoric and has been an outspoken critic of President Trump.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: The Obama-appointed judge that threatened the Trump administration with arrest if funding was not restored to USAID previously likened Trump's first term to the Civil War and Jim Crow and compared Trump to a tyrant in 2021 video footage uncovered by @nataliegwinters. Judge McConnell is an activist who has no business sitting in judgement of the president or his administration.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that American constitutional values have been tested in recent years, reminiscent of challenges during the Civil War, Reconstruction, and Jim Crow era. They liken this testing to inflating a balloon, suggesting the rule of law was stretched to its limit, nearly bursting. The speaker emphasizes the importance of courts in upholding the rule of law against arbitrary actions, referencing recent examples. They stress that the Constitution embodies American values in a legal sense. When sentencing, one must consider the defendant's background, acknowledging their unique experiences as a woman, Black individual, transgender person, or someone from a different socioeconomic background. The law must be applied with this understanding.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So, what's happened over the last four years or so, and at other times in our country's history, going back to the Civil War and Reconstruction and Jim Crow laws, the Civil Rights and during the last four years is that the values that we live by, the constitutional values that form the basis of our country have been tested and our institutions have been tested in ways that I don't think a lot of folks thought would survive. It got tested in the 1800s by a war, and we survived the war, sometimes well and sometimes not so well, but that's for another story. So what we saw the last four years in my mind was a new testing of it. And how I think about it is, it's like a balloon, you know, and and you're blowing up a balloon and and you and you keep pushing that air in. Well, at some point, the balloon's gonna pop. Right? And and and and and it feels like over the last four years with the challenges that have occurred to the rule of law in this country, that we came very close to that balloon popping. But where courts stand and enforce the rule of law that is against arbitrary and capricious actions by, what could be a tyrant or could be what happened. We saw plenty of examples of that recently. And it enforces our values. Our values, in a legal sense, the Constitution. And it's that reason that, and we find there are plenty of examples of a history and there's plenty of examples over the last four years through government actions when you're sentencing someone, when we talk about sentencing, that you have to take a moment and realize that this, you know, middle class white male, privileged person, needs to understand the human being that comes before us that maybe a woman and maybe black, maybe transgender, maybe poor, maybe rich, maybe whatever, may have experiences that aren't yours and you have to walk in their shoes and understand that the law applies to them where they are. And then you have to apply the law accordingly.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama-appointed judge threatened Trump and his team with arrest if they don't restore every last dime of funding that has been paused or cancelled. If the president wants to delay any payment he will need to justify his request to the judge's personal satisfaction.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 Last month, AFL uncovered that Judge McConnell has served nearly two decades on the Board of Crossroads Rhode Island, an organization that has received at least $128 million in government funding during that time.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6 AFL called for Judge McConnell to recuse himself from the case, given his history of opposition to President Trump and long-standing involvement with an organization that, after his ruling to keep federal funds flowing, stands to receive millions more in government funding.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

ICYMI — Judge McConnell, the federal judge blocking President Trump’s spending freeze, has served for 18 years on the board of a nonprofit that has received $128M in government funding during that time. Now, after his ruling to keep federal funds flowing, his nonprofit stands to receive millions more. Judge McConnell must recuse himself IMMEDIATELY.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨BREAKING — FEDERAL JUDGE McCONNELL MUST RECUSE HIMSELF IMMEDIATELY. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. READ ⬇️

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 Now, AFL is expanding its investigation into how Judge McConnell was selected for this case in the first place. Out of the 22 states and D.C., why was the lawsuit filed in Rhode Island? And why was Judge McConnell selected to hear the case? We intend to find out.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 An impartial judiciary is the cornerstone of America’s judicial system. AFL remains steadfast in its commitment to exposing the left’s lawfare against President Trump — and holding those behind it accountable.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 Read more here: https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-expands-investigation-into-forum-shopping-effort-to-bring-lawsuits-against-trump-administration-before-activist-judges/

America First Legal Expands Investigation into Forum-Shopping Effort to Bring Lawsuits Against Trump Administration Before Activist Judges WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal (AFL) expanded its investigation into Judge John McConnell, the Chief Judge of Rhode Island’s Federal District Court. Judge […] aflegal.org

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

As I predicted, Judge Chutkan unbelievably halts for now EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin cancellation of Biden era climate grants totally $20 billion sheltered at Citibank a few days before the 2024 election. She also halts transfer of remaining funds back to EPA as Zeldin ordered. For now, Citibank will have to continue paying out funds requested by these sham climate nonprofits including one tied to Stacey Abrams and one formed in 2023 that received $7 BILLION in taxpayer dollars in April 2024. This despite the outrageous nature of the arrangement—hiding $20 billion at a bank away from Congressional oversight—and the fact the slush fund is under investigation by DOJ and EPA IG. Hope John Roberts is happy!

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

My explainer here. https://open.substack.com/pub/juliekelly/p/the-real-scandal-behind-the-latest?r=4yy1i&utm_medium=ios

The Real Scandal Behind the Latest DOJ Defection The resignation of a top official with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington appears to be more partisanship by a longtime DOJ apparatchik tied to Democrats and a cover-up of a major scandal. declassified.live

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Obama judge is now acting like a special prosecutor and not an unbiased federal judge. Judge Boasberg is now conducting an evidentiary hearing demanding sworn testimony from a member of Trump's cabinet regarding state secrets. This is not normal.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: President Trump, Elon Musk, DOGE just scored a win over the activist judge who tried to force them to reinstate USAID The 4th Circuit just halted Activist Judge Chuang’s order, which required DOGE’s access to much of USAID be suspended. An expanded ruling could come later this week, but as of now, the appeals court is pumping the brakes on Judge Chuang’s BS ruling.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: President Trump, Elon Musk, DOGE just scored a win over the activist judge who tried to force them to reinstate USAID The 4th Circuit just halted Activist Judge Chuang’s order, which required DOGE’s access to much of USAID be suspended. An expanded ruling could come later this week, but as of now, the appeals court is pumping the brakes on Judge Chuang’s BS ruling.

@nyxxiana - Shelby Varney

@nicksortor There ARE good judges out there. But we need to get rid of the ones that don't follow the laws as written. AND all these Soros paid DAs. https://t.co/FQkRs4I6QT

@PeterBernegger - Peter Bernegger

2/ George Soros in Oshkosh Wisconsin and another surprise ending. There are not 70 district attorneys being controlled by George Soros and using federal taxpayers' monies.....there are 95! I found them and began creating a list, it is below. Look at this email from Fair and Just Prosecution non-profit Director Miriam Aroni Krinsky (in image below also) to all 90 (at the time) prosecutors: "All: Thanks to the many of you who brought your voices to the joint statement FJP issued last month with over 90 elected prosecutors pledging to use their settled discretion and not criminalize personal healthcare decisions. In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ending the long established, relied upon, and federally protected constitutional right to abortion, we know that many of you have stepped forward as leaders in your communities to protect reproductive rights and preserve access to abortion care. And we know that many elected prosecutors are working alongside, and in collaboration with, communities, advocates, and other elected leaders across the health and legal systems in these efforts. To support the developing work in this space and help facilitate the sharing of ideas and resources, FJP is aiming to gather information on actions being taken by elected prosecutors to protect reproductive rights, avoid criminalizing personal medical decisions, and proactively support access to necessary care and justice for all. Those actions might include (among others): joining lawsuits or briefs challenging the validity of state abortion restrictions, publishing “know your rights” materials or other resources for people seeking reproductive care, joining efforts to protect access to reproductive health care, addressing concerns about data privacy, or developing inter-agency policies protecting medical care and reproductive health in the face of restrictive laws. If you have any efforts or news that you, your office, or other leaders in your jurisdiction are researching, contemplating and planning – or any statements, policies, activities, engagement with other local leaders, or other actions you have already put in place – please let us know. You can send them on to me as well as Kalyn Hill at khill@fairandjustprosecution.org and Rebecca Blair at rblair@fairnadjustprosecution.org. We are aiming over the coming weeks to put together information and resources, including thoughts on how prosecutors can continue to engage to promote and protect reproductive rights and we welcome all of your ideas. Given the timeliness and fast-moving nature of this issue, if at all possible please pass on any responsive information on or before next Monday, August 1. As always, if you have any questions or if there is any way FJP can provide further support, please do not hesitate to reach out. Sincerely, Miriam & the FJP Team Miriam Aroni Krinsky Founder and Executive Director Fair and Just Prosecution Email: krinskym@krinsky.la Cell: (818) 416 5218" Notice Krinsky is not using an FJP email address. FJP is using federal tax dollars, from the Tides Center, to control these county prosecutors. And you'll see in future tweets the tremendous amount of time these prosecutors are spending on/with FJP - all the while being on the clock and paid by local taxpayers. FJP is using federal tax dollars, and local tax dollars also as all these county district attorneys are getting a paycheck, to control these local prosecutors. Getting them to sign pledges not to enforce laws passed by state legislatures! This all smacks of racketeering, defrauding the US Government, conspiring to defraud the US Govt., collusion and a host of other felony crimes. Alphabetical List of Prosecutors I'm including former and current known ones. This list is not complete, it will grow due to newly elected county prosecutors. Patriots: get public records requests out to these offices. Ask for emails, texts, pledges, agreements, any record with FJP (Fair and Just Prosecution) on it. Remember to put a time limit on it, such as the past 2 or 3 years for example. Call your local county supervisor, pass all this info onto them. Alabama Danny Carr - District Attorney, Jefferson County Arizona Laura Conover - County Attorney, Pima County California Michael Atwell - District Attorney, Alpine County Diana Becton - District Attorney, Contra Costa County George Gascón - District Attorney, Los Angeles County Nancy O’Malley - District Attorney, Alameda County Jill Ravitch - District Attorney, Sonoma County Jeff Rosen - District Attorney, Santa Clara County Colorado Michael Dougherty - District Attorney, 20th Judicial District (Boulder) Gordon McLaughlin - District Attorney, 8th Judicial District Beth McCann - District Attorney, 2nd Judicial District (Denver) Brian Mason - District Attorney, 17th Judicial District Alonzo Payne - District Attorney, 12th Judicial District Delaware Kathleen Jennings - Attorney General District of Columbia Karl Racine - Attorney General Florida Andrew Warren - State Attorney, 13th Judicial Circuit (Tampa) Georgia Patsy Austin-Gatson - District Attorney, Gwinnett Judicial Circuit Sherry Boston - District Attorney, DeKalb County David Cooke - District Attorney, Macon Judicial Circuit Deborah Gonzalez - District Attorney, Western Judicial Circuit (Athens) Dalia Racine - District Attorney, Douglas County Jared Williams - District Attorney, Augusta Judicial Circuit Hawaii Rebecca Like - Prosecuting Attorney, County of Kaua’i Illinois Kimberly M. Foxx - State’s Attorney, Cook County (Chicago) Jamie Mosser - State’s Attorney, Kane County Eric Rinehart - State’s Attorney, Lake County (Waukegan) Dora A. Villarreal - State’s Attorney, Rock Island County Indiana Ryan Mears - Prosecuting Attorney, Marion County (Indianapolis) Kansas Suzanne Valdez - District Attorney, Douglas County (Lawrence) Louisiana Jason Williams - District Attorney, Orleans Parish Maine Natasha Irving - District Attorney, 6th Prosecutorial District Maryland Aisha Braveboy - State’s Attorney, Prince George’s County Marilyn J. Mosby - State’s Attorney, Baltimore City Massachusetts Rob Galibois - District Attorney, Cape and Islands Andrea Harrington - District Attorney, Berkshire County Marian Ryan - District Attorney, Middlesex County David Sullivan - District Attorney, Northwestern District Michael W. Morrissey - District Attorney, Norfolk County Michigan Dana Nessel - Attorney General Karen McDonald - Prosecuting Attorney, Oakland County Eli Savit - Prosecuting Attorney, Washtenaw County (Ann Arbor) Carol Siemon - Prosecuting Attorney, Ingham County (Lansing) Matthew J. Wiese - Prosecuting Attorney, Marquette County Minnesota Keith Ellison - Attorney General John Choi - County Attorney, Ramsey County Mary Moriarty - County Attorney, Hennepin County Mississippi Shameca Collins - District Attorney, 6th Judicial District Jody Owens - District Attorney, Hinds County Missouri Wesley Bell - Prosecuting Attorney, St. Louis County New Mexico Mary Carmack-Altwies - District Attorney, 1st Judicial District Raúl Torrez - District Attorney, Bernalillo County (Albuquerque) New York Alvin Bragg - District Attorney, New York County (Manhattan) Dave Clegg - District Attorney, Ulster County Eric Gonzalez - District Attorney, Kings County (Brooklyn) Mimi Rocah - District Attorney, Westchester County Matthew Van Houten - District Attorney, Tompkins County (Ithaca) North Carolina Satana Deberry - District Attorney, Durham County Todd Williams - District Attorney, Buncombe County (Asheville) Ohio Zach Klein - City Attorney, Columbus Michael O’Malley - County Prosecutor, Cuyahoga County (Cleveland) Oregon Matt Ellis - District Attorney, Wasco County John Hummel - District Attorney, Deschutes County Mike Schmidt - District Attorney, Multnomah County (Portland) Pennsylvania Lawrence S. Krasner - District Attorney, Philadelphia Jack Stollsteimer - District Attorney, Delaware County Texas John Creuzot - District Attorney, Dallas County José Garza - District Attorney, Travis County (Austin) Brian Middleton - District Attorney, Fort Bend County Joe Gonzales - District Attorney, Bexar County (San Antonio) Mark Gonzalez - District Attorney, Nueces County (Corpus Christi) Vermont Sarah F. George - State’s Attorney, Chittenden County (Burlington) Joshua R. Diamond - Acting Attorney General Virginia Buta Biberaj - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Loudoun County Parisa Dehghani-Tafti - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Arlington County and the City of Falls Church Steve Descano - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Fairfax County Jim Hingeley - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Albemarle County Ramin Fatehi - Commonwealth’s Attorney, City of Norfolk Colette McEachin - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Richmond Stephanie Morales - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Portsmouth Bryan Porter - Commonwealth’s Attorney, City of Alexandria Shannon Taylor - Commonwealth’s Attorney, Henrico County Washington Ann Davison - City Attorney, Seattle Dan Satterberg - Prosecuting Attorney, King County Wisconsin John T. Chisholm - District Attorney, Milwaukee County Eric D. Sparr - District Attorney, Winnebago County Northern Mariana Islands Edward E. Manibusan - Attorney General Miriam Aroni Krinsky in effect is working for George Soros, the guy who admitted on 60 Minutes he pointed out Jews to the Nazi's - where those Jews were then gassed to death in the concentration camps. Ms. Krinsky is Jewish. Many on FJP's staff are Jewish also. What sick people they are. @fjp_org @SidneyPowell1 @RonJohnsonWI @SenRonJohnson @WisGOP @WinnebagoGOP @wioshkosh @WCSO_Wisconsin (Sheriff how about an investigation?) @WaukeshaGOP @Rasmussen_Poll @BehizyTweets @EmeraldRobinson @nataliegwinters @JamesOKeefeIII @GrothmanforWI @RepTonyWied @RCGforSenate @realDonaldTrump @PamBondi @Kash_Patel @DanScavino @KenPaxtonTX @LAGovJeffLandry @elonmusk @Article3Project @mrddmia @julie_kelly2 @TheLastRefuge2 @CannConActual @AsheinAmerica @ConradsonJordan

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: A federal judge has just ruled AGAINST Kari Lake and the Trump admin, forcing them to CONTINUE funding deep state propaganda radio stations in Europe WTF? HOW IS THIS REAL? Keep fighting @KariLake! WE THE PEOPLE have your back! https://t.co/GSTFmPcfBE

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

Tyrmand has been evading a federal subpoena. A federal Judge in SDNY has JUST GRANTED our motion to serve Tyrmand through alternative methods. @MatthewTyrmand, you've been officially served. Justice is coming.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

https://therightscoop.com/breaking-james-okeefe-is-about-to-expose-the-man-who-fired-him-at-project-veritas/

BREAKING: James O’Keefe is about to expose the man who fired him at Project Veritas – The Right Scoop therightscoop.com

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

A federal judge has ordered you be served for a deposition. Here’s his explanation. Are you going to mock a Federal Judge? https://t.co/EMz1L61T4a

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

The Supreme Court has issued its long-awaited ruling in the Alien Enemies Act case, AARP v. Trump. The Court rules 7-2 that AEA detainees need more notice than was given. So they cannot presently be deported. Kavanaugh concurs. Alito and Thomas dissent (as before). 1/ https://t.co/jXNl46YQhD

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

After noting the gamesmanship, SCOTUS explains that the 5th Cir. erred in finding no jurisdiction. There is jurisdiction for emergency appeals when the practical effect of the lower courts is the same as refusing an injunction. Also, the gov't's notice was insufficient. 2/ https://t.co/Qf970os9Tg

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Because the gov't took such drastic action so quickly, 24 hour notice is nought enough to satisfy DUE PROCESS, which JJG v. Trump already held is required. But how much notice is required can be addressed on remand, while an injunction stays in place. Now, Alito's dissent. 3/

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Joined by Justice Thomas, Alito says there is no jurisdiction. He acknowledges that there can be jurisdiction in light of practical reality, but here, "the D.Ct. had no good reason to think the petitioners were in imminent danger of removal." 4/ https://t.co/oNRGpeEmcI

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Calling the evidence "sketchy," Alito says it was reasonable to give the gov't 24 hours to respond to the emergency motion. He says that ACLU's actions in demanding an immediate ruling "represented a very stark departure from what is usually regarded as acceptable practice." 5/ https://t.co/Pp8jcLzevK

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

So Alito argues that the inaction was not constructive denial. He also says the Court mustn't consider evidence not in the record on 4/18. So there was no "concrete evidence" that removals were imminent. 6 declarations and a photo of the notice of removal were not enough. 6/ https://t.co/lhHnI1NxQ6

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Even if there were denial, there is no grounds for reversal, Alito says, because the applicants failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits. This includes that class relief would be available (a point the majority disagrees with). 7/ https://t.co/ZvC0UIWIWm

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Alito says that class relief is probably unavailable for habeas corpus. And even if something like class relief were available, there is unlikely a class here because the named plaintiffs (unlike the putative class) did get notice sufficient for them to file habeas. 8/ https://t.co/kmcX5a8SFn

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Alito also criticizes the majority for not engaging with the d.ct. ruling and overreaching in its decision. Now, we can return to the majority's response to the dissent... 9/ https://t.co/FqA5Dar3cw

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

The majority says that Alito's reasoning is not persuasive. First, he mischaracterizes the evidence on 4/18, which showed an imminent risk of permanent removal without due process: namely, that people were being loaded on buses to the airport. 10/ https://t.co/arkdF3sWLt

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

And nobody, including the named plaintiffs, received adequate notice. Notably, the Court "rejects the proposition that a class-action defendant may defeat class treatment, if it is otherwise proper, by promising as a matter of grace to treat named plaintiffs differently." 11/ https://t.co/s0QGQ8PU6A

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

So the gov't cannot remove anyone in the class under the Alien Enemies Act, pending further review in the courts. But if, as it claims, the gov't has grounds to otherwise remove people in the class, it can do so under those lawful authorities. 12/ https://t.co/u8zJF6xyxz

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Now, Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence. Given the urgency, he would have granted certiorari and immediately resolve the legal issues. Now, things will take even more time on remand. 13/ https://t.co/sr0uaydatj

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

Ok, now my 2 cents: This decision is a strong message from the Court to the executive to knock off the shenanigans—both in and out of court. Justice Kavanaugh’s concurrence highlights that the Court is not going the gov’t to get its way with unclean hands. 14/

@pjaicomo - Patrick Jaicomo

And with respect to Justices Alito and Thomas, it simply beggars belief that there was insufficient evidence that the gov’t was about to imminently rendition the detainees (who were on buses) and then pretend it couldn’t get them back (see Abrego-Garcia). 15/

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 WIFE OF KOREAN BORN, BIDEN APPOINTED JUDGE MYONG JOUN WHO JUST BLOCKED TRUMP FROM SHUTTING DOWN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS A WIFE WHO USES PRONOUNS AND IS THE PRINCIPAL OF A PRO-DEI COMPANY CALLED DIVERSITY AT WORKPLACE 🚨 In yet another example of a rogue activist judge engaged in a judicial coup against President Trump and the power of the Executive Branch, today, Myong Joun, a Biden-appointed U.S. District Judge, blocked President Trump from shutting down the Department of Education. He also ordered Trump to reinstate over 1,300 employees who were fired from the Department of Education. You’ll recall, the reason why @POTUS wanted to shut down the Department of Education is because he accused it of “indoctrinating” students with “radical” ideas like critical race theory, gender ideology, or diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This resonated with conservative voters concerned about cultural shifts in schools, particularly around race, gender, and history education. Judge Joun’s wife is named Su Joun. This is what her bio says on the webpage for the Diversity company she works for called “Diversity@ Workplace”. She is the PRINCIPAL of the company. “(she/her/hers) Su Joun is the Principal of Diversity@Workplace Consulting Group LLC which works with organizations to diversify their workforce and create inclusive, equitable work environments through consultation and training.” This is another egregious CONFLICT OF INTEREST! @CcpSkipTracer @LoomerUnleashed RECEIPTS 👇🏻 Cc: @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @elonmusk @katierosemiller @StephenM @SusieWiles

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

This is Su Joun, the wife of anti-Trump, Korean born Judge Myong Joun who just blocked President Trump from shutting down the Department of Education. In this video, she is talking about the importance of DEI. She works for a Diversity company called “Diversity@ Workplace”. She is the PRINCIPAL of the company. The judge’s wife also uses she/her/hers pronouns.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

EXCLUSIVE: 🌈 🌈 Judge Myong Joun, the Korean Born, Biden-appointed federal judge who just blocked President Trump from shutting down the Department of Education over DEI and LGBTQ agendas in public schools has a Trans son who thinks he’s a girl! The trans son is named Marshall Joun, and he works for his mother’s DEI company called “Diversity@ Work”. Judge Joun failed to disclose the conflict of interest created by his wife’s job, and his son’s mental disorder. Marshall Joun has they/he/she pronouns in his bio on the website for “Diversity@Work” the pro DEI company his mother is the Principal of. Their X handle is @DiverseWork, and Marshall Joun is listed as the Online Content Manager at Diversity@Work (which means he’s probably reading this! Hi Marshall! You’re a man, not a woman and your father is a corrupt judge!)👋 @LoomerUnleashed cross referenced property records that prove Marshall and the Judge live at the same house in Arlington, Massachusetts. I have the original property and mortgage records for any reporter or lawyer interested in verifying the claims. I don’t want to post them on X because of rules against doxxing, but it’s the same exact address. The Korean judge has a trans son and a DEI obsessed wife which is why he blocked President Trump from shutting down the Department of Education over DEI and LGBTQ agendas. This is a massive conflict of interest! @LoomerUnleashed @CcpSkipTracer @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @Linda_McMahon @SusieWiles @StephenM @elonmusk Receipts 👇🏻

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

EXCLUSIVE: 🚨 WIFE OF KOREAN BORN, BIDEN APPOINTED JUDGE MYONG JOUN WHO JUST BLOCKED TRUMP FROM SHUTTING DOWN THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HAS A WIFE WHO USES PRONOUNS AND IS THE PRINCIPAL OF A PRO-DEI COMPANY CALLED DIVERSITY AT WORKPLACE 🚨 In yet another example of a rogue activist judge engaged in a judicial coup against President Trump and the power of the Executive Branch, today, Myong Joun, a Biden-appointed U.S. District Judge, blocked President Trump from shutting down the Department of Education. He also ordered Trump to reinstate over 1,300 employees who were fired from the Department of Education. You’ll recall, the reason why @POTUS wanted to shut down the Department of Education is because he accused it of “indoctrinating” students with “radical” ideas like critical race theory, gender ideology, or diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This resonated with conservative voters concerned about cultural shifts in schools, particularly around race, gender, and history education. Judge Joun’s wife is named Su Joun. This is what her bio says on the webpage for the Diversity company she works for called “Diversity@ Workplace”. She is the PRINCIPAL of the company. “(she/her/hers) Su Joun is the Principal of Diversity@Workplace Consulting Group LLC which works with organizations to diversify their workforce and create inclusive, equitable work environments through consultation and training.” This is another egregious CONFLICT OF INTEREST! @CcpSkipTracer @LoomerUnleashed RECEIPTS 👇🏻 Cc: @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @elonmusk @katierosemiller @StephenM @SusieWiles

@wendyp4545 - Wendy Patterson

Republicans don't want the illegals removed either. Because if they did, they could stop these Judges.

@ProfMJCleveland - Margot Cleveland

🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Another day, another federal court injunction. Here court turned temporary restraining order into an preliminary injunction, prohibiting firings at numerous agencies. 1/ https://t.co/gNnQFFxgW4

@StephenM - Stephen Miller

Once again, the Courts give extraordinary preferential treatment to illegal alien foreign terrorists. The Boulder terrorist is an illegal, his entire family that he imported to America are illegals, and now a Biden Judge is blocking their deportation. End the judicial coup.

@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin

BREAKING: Colorado federal judge Gordon Gallagher, a Biden appointee, has issued an order blocking the Trump administration from deporting the wife and five children of Boulder terror suspect Mohamed Soliman. https://t.co/Lo8R1Yp19E

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

BREAKING: @AGPamBondi and SG John Sauer have filed an emergency application in the Supreme Court regarding their huge win in the USAID impoundment case, which we discussed previously.  This is a big deal, as I'll explain. 1/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

First a point of privilege.  Having lived this case in the early days of @DOGE---with then-Acting SG Sarah Harris and many others---I really appreciate how the SG's Office frames the issue. 2/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

Second, you might be wondering why @TheJusticeDept is seeking emergency relief in a case it *won*. Even though the DC Circuit deemed the district court's injunction patently unlawful, that injunction dissolves only when the DC Circuit issues its formal mandate. 3/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

So where is the mandate?  Who knows!  It could be caught in en banc proceedings, the DC Circuit could be following its normal (slow) process, or something else.  But for the Government, this doesn't work.  It has a September 30 deadline to make decisions.  4/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

DOJ's only recourse is accordingly the Supreme Court.  5/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

Turning to the merits, for most of our history the political branches waged interbranch conflicts using the substantial weapons the framers gave them.  The notion that judges would referee disputes between Congress and the President would have shocked the founding generation.  6/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

But everything changed at one of our all-time nadirs of presidential power--the post-Nixon era--when Congress, among other things, enacted the Impoundment Control Act.  That Act imposes a complex process for rescinding funds, as DOJ explains. 7/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

But there is one thing that Act does *not* do--authorize NGOs, private charities, aggrieved states, or other private plaintiffs to sue about impoundment.  And without a cause of action to sue, you cannot sue. 8/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

Yet here, "a single district court supplanted that process."  One district judge has commandeered the entire USAID appropriation and enjoined the Executive Branch to spend every penny--all without Congress authorizing the underlying suit in the first place.  9/

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

This litigation is important. But it also highlights the importance of procedure.  DOJ *won* its appeal, but the DC Circuit's refusal to issue its "mandate"---an obscure term if ever there was one---now threatens to impose a constructive loss, costing us all billions of $$. /10

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

So once again, the Supreme Court is called to the field.  This is a vitally important issue.  Let us hope the justices act swiftly. /end

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

PS - I will post a link to the stay application when it appears on the Supreme Court website. Had to pull this off the DC Circuit docket via PACER and can't figure out how to post a full PDF to X.

@BurnhamDC - James Burnham

Here's the link: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26076098-globalhealthscotusapp082625/

GlobalHealthSCOTUSApp082625 documentcloud.org

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

IMPORTANT UPDATE - Shaun Rickard and Karl Harrison's Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit - October 22nd, 2025 - @KarlDHarrison After nearly 4 years, the 15,000 pages of evidence – including some extremely damning/incriminating details – is getting closer to Court. Further to the Federal Court ruling that our landmark action can go to trial, the appeal to ensure the whole action can proceed will be heard on November 3rd, 2025 in the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Further to our earlier and full update below from January 9th of this year, we now now move a step closer to the opportunity to fully hold the Liberal government, and Justin Trudeau, to account in court. Their divisive, cruel and unscientific overreach in imposing a nearly 9 months ban on unvaccinated Canadians and Permanent Residents from travelling on planes, trains and ships caused hardship and damage to millions of people in Canada. The hard work of our talented young lawyer, Sam Presvelos, paid off in June 2022 when evidence emerging in discovery in those earlier stages of the case caused then Attorney General David Lametti to reconsider the government’s position and the ‘vaccine mandate for travel’ was suspended with the implicit threat being made that they would do it again if they wanted to do so. In a moment of respite those millions of people, denied their fundamental Section 6 rights for nearly 9 months, could once again travel to see their loved ones and family events; to work; and to take much needed vacation time. This appeal, which will be heard at the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto on November 3rd at 1pm Eastern Time, will consider whether Justice Kent Horne erred when he allowed the government’s motion to strike out two parts of our claim – those parts in relation to s.7 and s.12 of the Charter. Justice Horne allowed those parts in relation to s6 and s15 to go ahead to trial pending the outcome of this appeal and any further appeals that may follow. s.7 (life, liberty, security) deals with crucial rights that permit us all to decide for ourselves what happens to our body. We believe that the choice to accept a vaccine or not should be free of any sort of coercion or detrimental consequences imposed by any authority. They do not accept that the bar to their success in relation to s.7 is so high as to have no reasonable prospect of success and that their arguments should be allowed to proceed to trial. s.12 (cruel/unusual punishment) is normally heard in relation to the cruel and unusual punishment of people in the criminal justice system in relation to penal sanctions. We believe that then Prime Minister Trudeau developed the vaccine mandate as a deliberately cruel and unusual punishment for those Canadians who were exercising their s7 right to refuse the Covid-19 vaccines and, at the same time to use that punishment very publicly as a political campaign promise and ‘wedge issue’ in the 2021 General Election. The appeal will not be easy, but our case is in great hands with Sam Presvelos, the young litigator who achieved so much for millions of people in Canada who were, until June 2022, denied the right to even leave their country! If we succeed the government may then try to further appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. It is very apparent that they do not want this case to be heard and particularly, perhaps, the s.7 arguments. If we are unsuccessful at this stage, they may take their arguments to the Supreme Court. We want to have our arguments and evidence heard on all four Sections 6,7,12 and 15. More details, updates and options available to donate to our legal fund can be found here on our official website: https://www.freedomandjustice.ca/travel-mandates-case/

Travel Mandates Case - The Institute for Freedom and Justice freedomandjustice.ca

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

BIG NEWS! Justice Kent Horne recently ruled that our Vaccine Travel Mandates Lawsuit can proceed to trial. After 3 long & arduous years, our 15,000 pages of damning evidence will finally be heard in a public Federal Court hearing - Please repost this announcement widely. Institute for Freedom & Justice - Our full official press release and all court documents can be reviewed here: https://www.freedomandjustice.ca/travel-mandates-case/ SUMMARY - Trudeau’s Discriminatory Travel Ban Finally Heads To Trial In October of 2021 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau imposed upon Canadians a discriminatory and unscientific requirement to be vaccinated for Covid-19 before being able to board planes, trains or ships travelling within or out of Canada. The restrictions implemented by Trudeau effectively prevented millions of Canadians from moving freely around in their own country and travelling abroad to work or to visit loved ones. Two months later, in December of 2021, Shaun Rickard and Karl Harrison filed an application in the Federal Court to challenge the restrictions imposed by Trudeau. Inspired by Shaun and Karl three other similar applications were filed subsequently by the Hon Brian Peckford (and others), the Hon Maxime Bernier and a courageous young Quebec attorney, Nabil Ben Naoum. All four cases would be managed by Shaun and Karl’s young and brilliant lawyer, Sam Presvelos. Over the next 6 months – including 6 weeks of cross examination of as many as 25 witnesses – there were around 15,000 pages of evidence assembled which showed that the Prime Minister had lied to the Canadian people about his so-called ‘health measures’, which had in fact been imposed only to create a ‘wedge issue’ and to aid his general election campaign in the Summer and Fall of 2021. Faced with the reality of the overwhelming evidence, three of Trudeau’s ministers held a press conference on June 14th 2022 to announce that his travel mandate would be suspended. Immediately afterwards Trudeau’s lawyers filed a motion to strike the legal proceedings on the basis that they were deemed moot. The Federal Court supported Trudeau’s motion and, whilst Shaun and Karl appealed the decision, the Federal Court of Appeal also decided that the matter was moot and that there would be no trial of this matter despite enormous public interest from the Canadian people. Close to 20,000 people attended the hearing via Zoom. Brian Peckford and Maxime Bernier appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, which refused to hear their appeals. Shaun and Karl decided instead upon a different strategy, one that they felt had a better chance of a positive outcome. Earlier in the proceedings in the Federal Court in Ottawa, Sam Presvelos had been successful in getting agreement from the Trudeau lawyers that if Shaun and Karl were to file an action for damages, then the government would not oppose use of the large and valuable evidentiary record from the earlier case. In November of 2023 Shaun and Karl filed their claim for damages against the Trudeau government. Preliminary proceedings were protracted, and Trudeau’s lawyers filed a motion, in July 2023, to strike the claim entirely. In November of 2024 Sam Presvelos represented Shaun and Karl in the Federal Court in Toronto to fight the motion to strike the claim. The outcome is perhaps not what Trudeau expected. The case will go to trial! The claim was made in relation to a breach, by the Trudeau government, of the rights afforded to Shaun and Karl under Sections 6(1), 7, 12 and 15 of the Charter of Rights & Freedoms. The Court’s ruling found as follows: Section 6(1) - The claim can proceed to trial for Karl but not for Shaun on the basis that Shaun was not a Canadian citizen, but a permanent resident, when the travel mandate was in place. (Canadian permanent residents are not protected under Section 6(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.) Section 7 - The claim is struck subject to appeal. (Appeal has been filed) Section 12 - The claim is struck subject to appeal. (Appeal has been filed) Section 15 - The claim can proceed to trial for both Shaun and Karl Therefore, the Federal Court has decided that it will hear the case as to whether mobility rights were infringed and whether so called “unvaccinated” Canadians are in fact a protected group against whom Trudeau discriminated. Shaun and Karl are now pursuing an appeal in relation to the ruling on Sections 7 and 12. Such an appeal is unlikely to be heard for several months. If that appeal is successful then the government lawyers may appeal further to the Supreme Court, and that hearing would take place some months later. There are also political issues to consider. A federal election will take place in 2025 and a new government may likely take a different view of these legal proceedings. It has been a long and arduous journey for Shaun Rickard, Karl Harrison, Sam Presvelos and the thousands of Canadians who were also impacted and who have generously supported the case. This fight for justice is enormously important to millions of Canadians and the eventual outcome, if successful, may shape how future governments in Canada are allowed to impose restrictions in relation to public health concerns, and therefore protect generations to come. The fight ahead may well be long and financially demanding. If you are able to support Shaun and Karl in this final, critical stage of this landmark legal battle against the Trudeau government you can do so by donating to their legal fund through the Institute for Freedom & Justice* here: https://www.freedomandjustice.ca/donate/ *Institute for Freedom & Justice is a registered Canadian charity (#85481 6162 RR0001), therefore a tax receipt can be issued. Media enquiries: info@freedomandjustice.ca

Travel Mandates Case - The Institute for Freedom and Justice freedomandjustice.ca

Donate - The Institute for Freedom and Justice freedomandjustice.ca

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

@KarlDHarrison More details, updates and options available to donate to our legal fund can be found here on our official website: https://www.freedomandjustice.ca/travel-mandates-case/

Travel Mandates Case - The Institute for Freedom and Justice freedomandjustice.ca

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

@grok, are you able to forward this update to @elonmusk? We'd like to see if Mr. Musk has interest in supporting this landmark lawsuit which will hold the Trudeau/Liberal government to account for their tyrannical overreach & charter violations? Even simply reposting it perhaps?

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

@grok @elonmusk @grok, you did not respond to my question above?

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

@otsleeel @KarlDHarrison Waiting for links from the FCA... stay tuned

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

@KyleTober @KarlDHarrison I'm currently waiting for the FCA to to get back to me with that information, stay tuned.