reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
In recent developments, questions have arisen regarding Senator Elizabeth Warren's alleged involvement in various actions against the crypto industry. Accusations include coordinating with a short seller to trigger bank runs, colluding with regulatory bodies for a renewed crackdown, and using false data to shift blame for Biden's Iran failures onto crypto. These claims demand clarification from Senator Warren. Sources: Yahoo Finance, The Hill, Cato Institute.
@martypartymusic - MartyParty
Questions for @SenWarren: - We have evidence you coordinated with short seller Marc Cohodes to spark the Silvergate-Signature-SVB bank runs because they banked crypto. Is this true? - We have witness statements saying you colluded with the FDIC, Treasury & OCC to enact Chokepoint 2.0 against crypto. Is this true? - This week you used fake data to plant a WSJ story that diverted blame for Biden’s Iran failures on crypto which was redacted by @WSJ yet you have not commented. Do you have a comment? 👀 @ewarren we would love some answers. Seems you are compromised. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/curious-tale-elizabeth-warren-short-151317062.html https://thehill.com/policy/finance/268223-house-passes-bill-to-curb-operation-choke-point/ https://www.cato.org/blog/warren-targets-crypto-questionable-data-again-0
The curious tale of Elizabeth Warren and the short-seller
There is a juicy rumor in Washington, D.C., that Sen. Warren's crypto policy has been informed by a short-seller. But is it true?
finance.yahoo.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Senator Elizabeth Warren violated her oath by conspiring with Gary Gensler, providing him with pre-determined questions and answers for a hearing. As a critic of Bitcoin and crypto, she failed to question Gensler about his meetings with SBF, the fraudulent CEO of an offshore exchange. Warren's ties to SBF's parents raise concerns about her impartiality. Despite pleas from constituents, she refused to address the SEC's actions against XRP holders. This raises questions about her priorities and disregard for regular people.
@JohnEDeaton1 - John E Deaton
ELIZABETH WARREN VIOLATED HER OATH As a Senator, sitting on the Banking Committee, @ewarren violated her oath. Her job is to provide and engage in actual oversight of the @SECGov. Instead, she conspired with her close friend @GaryGensler, not only giving him the exact questions she would ask before a hearing, but also the suggested answers to those same questions. That isn’t oversight - it’s fraudulent, coached testimony before Congress. She literally said that she didn’t want to place Gensler in a tough spot. Are you f’ing kidding me? HER JOB is to place the Chairman of the SEC in a tough spot - asking hard hitting or “tough” questions. Think about this: Elizabeth Warren is 💯 the single biggest critic of #Bitcoin and Crypto in the U.S. Congress. She sits on the Banking Committee overseeing the SEC. And yet, she hasn’t asked the SEC or Gensler about SBF’s multiple meetings with Gensler and the SEC. She hasn’t questioned why or how Gensler MISSED SBF’s Fraud, considering his up and close meetings with SBF. And why was Gensler meeting with SBF multiple times? Gensler wasn’t meeting with @brian_armstrong @iampaulgrewal and the @coinbase team - despite Coinbase begging for meetings and being the largest exchange in America and also a U.S. publicly traded company! No. Instead, Gensler was meeting with the CEO of an OFF SHORE exchange in the Bahamas who turned out to be the Bernie Madoff of Crypto. In her job overseeing the SEC, why hasn’t Warren asked for those meeting notes like @PatrickMcHenry and the @FinancialCmte have? Warren preaches against Crypto every chance she can, but doesn’t ask why Gensler missed @FTX_Official @CelsiusNetwork Luna/UST, etc.? Why not? She found time to help kill a couple banks that worked with Crypto companies. Why not focus on the source of the problem: actual fraud? Is she not asking certain questions because of her own ties to SBF’s parents? SBF’s father - Joe Bankman wrote Warren’s tax plan in 2016. We know without a doubt that he helped SBF create all those shell companies to avoid taxes. SBF’s Mother runs a PAC to help Democrats, like Warren, take get elected. I have over 600 #XRP holders who live in Massachusetts and who are her constituents. We begged Warren’s office to inquire about the SEC and do her job. Not only would she not give us the time of day, her staff said “The Senator is never going to help considering the SEC sued a couple billionaires” aka @chrislarsensf & @bgarlinghouse. What kind of position is that? Regular hard working people, including hundreds of her constituents, be damned, as long as a couple billionaires get screwed as well?
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
AOC’s staffers ASSAULT journalist @nicksortor as AOC runs away from his border question. She then lies and says that Nick was touching her. Only on 𝕏 do you see the real dirty truth of how disgraceful lawmakers act. https://t.co/prAe0D5H9v
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ocasio-Cortez discusses the impact of the border crisis on her district. Tensions rise as she confronts an individual who is physically blocking her path. She expresses frustration over being touched and insists on her right to move freely. The interaction becomes heated as she questions whether the individual is engaging with the Biden administration about border issues. Despite the confrontation, she maintains her focus on the pressing concerns affecting her constituents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Ocasio Cortez. Your yeah. So your district is really suffering under the the pressure of the border crisis. What? Why why are Don't I'm sorry.
Don't try to get through this floor, man. Don't touch me. What do you What? Your your your district is very much suffering for the border crime. Right?
Border crime. Why will you not no. You're out of my way. Excuse me, sir. Just go out of my way.
Get dude, fucking get your hands off me. What? You're going upstairs, man. Relax. Stop flaxing me.
Sir, are you talking to the Biden administration about about thank you, about fixing the border that you get off of me? What is wrong with you? You have to touch me on the stairs. Thank you. I did not touch you.
I have an old video.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Elizabeth Warren has humiliating psychotic breakdown doing everything she can to protect her big corporate pharma donors. RFK ends her in 7 second masterclass: RFK: "You're asking me not to sue pharma companies" Warren: "NO I AM NOT!" RFK: "That's exactly what you're doing" https://t.co/I2SCwy4K4R
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm asking if you will agree not to sue drug companies.
I'm not agreeing to that.
As secretary of HHS, you could influence lawsuits in many ways, such as promoting anti-vaccine views, appointing like-minded individuals, or changing vaccine schedules and compensation rules. You could even share FDA data with law firms for their benefit.
I'm asking you to commit not to financially benefit from these lawsuits while serving as secretary.
I will comply with ethical guidelines.
You're trying to undermine vaccines. As secretary, you could harm vaccine access while profiting from it.
I support vaccines and the childhood schedule; I just want good science.
Then say you won't profit from your role as secretary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I'm asking about fees from suing drug companies. Will you agree not to do that?
Speaker 1: You're asking me to not sue drug companies, and I'm not gonna agree to
Speaker 0: that separate companies as much as you want.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna agree to not suit our companies or anybody.
Speaker 0: So let's do a quick count here of how, as secretary of HHS, if you get confirmed, you could influence every one of those lawsuits. Well, let me start the list. You could publish your anti vaccine conspiracies, but this time, on US government letterhead, something a jury might be impressed by. You could appoint
Speaker 1: people I don't understand.
Speaker 0: Vaccine panel who share your anti vaxx views and let them do your dirty work. You could tell the CDC vaccine panel to remove a particular vaccine from the vaccine schedule. You could remove vaccines from special compensation programs, which would open up manufacturers to mass torts. You could make more injuries eligible for compensation even if there is no causal evidence. You could change vaccine court processes to make it easier to bring junk lawsuits.
You could turn over FDA data to your friends at the law firm, and they could use it however it benefited them. You could change vaccine labeling. You could change vaccine information rules. You could change which claims are compensated in the vaccine injury compensation program. There's a lot of ways that you can influence those future lawsuits and pending lawsuits while you are secretary of HHS, and I'm asking you to commit right now that you will not take a financial stake in every one of those lawsuits so that what you do as secretary will also benefit you financially down the line.
Speaker 1: I I I'll comply with all the ethical guidelines, sir.
Speaker 0: Not the question. You and I, you have said
Speaker 1: Sir, you're asking me not to serve vaccine No. I am not. My You are. That's exactly what you're doing. Look.
Speaker 0: No one should be fooled here.
Speaker 1: I I As secretary
Speaker 0: of HHS, Robert Kennedy will have the power to undercut vaccines and vaccine manufacturing across our country. And for all of his talk about follow the science and his promise that he won't interfere with those of us who wanna vaccinate his kids, the bottom line is the same. Kennedy can kill off access to vaccines and make 1,000,000 of dollars while he does it. Kids might die, but Robert Kennedy can keep cashing in.
Speaker 1: Senator, I support vaccines. I I support the childhood schedule. I will do that. The only thing I want is good science, and that's it.
Speaker 0: How about then say you won't make money off what you do as secretary of HHS?
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
The corrupt politicians “protesting” outside the USAID building are the ones getting money from USAID. That’s why they’re there – they want your stolen tax dollars!
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
"Nobody elected your ass! This is not Elon Musk's country!" - Rep Maxine Waters goes on an unhinged rant attacking Elon Musk at the anti-Elon rally. All this drama because Americans simply asked what our tax dollars are funding. https://t.co/tNRwfAKNPi
Video Transcript AI Summary
California, we need to address Elon Musk. Nobody elected him to control our private information or payments. He's profited enough from our government and now wants to dictate how we manage our finances. We must protect our federal employees and assert that this is our country, not Musk's or Trump's. The billionaire class is trying to dominate and profit at our expense, but we will not allow it. They are creating cryptocurrency to enrich themselves, not to benefit the people. We must stand firm, regardless of the weather, and demand decent jobs and respect. Musk won't even meet with local officials, showing his disregard for the community. We cannot be intimidated; when the people fight, we win. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California. Hello, everybody. We have convened here in the right place, the Treasury Department. We have got to tell Elon Musk nobody elected your ass. Nobody told you you could get all of our private information.
Nobody told you you could be in charge of the payments of this country. We have told you you've made enough money off our government yourself. And now you wanna take everybody else's payroll and make sure that they don't make the kind of money that you have made. Oh, you wanna use our money to go to Mars? No.
We wanna use our money right here in Washington, DC, in this country. We wanna make sure that all of our federal employees are protected. We've got to make sure that you know and understand nobody elected you. You think you're the pro president of The United States Of America, the co president that can take over, go into our private payment system, and do whatever you wanna do. You got another thought coming.
We're gonna stop you right now. Ladies and gentlemen, we're at a crisis in this country. We're having in a crisis in this country because Trump and Elon Musk and the billionaires have decided they're gonna put us all in our place. They're gonna run this country. They're gonna make sure that they take over everything.
Are we gonna let them do that? Are we gonna let them run this government in the way that they can make even more money? And so they won't stop. It is so brazen. Every day, they're taking new actions.
They're taking executive actions. Every day, they're doing something. Do you know that Trump and the billionaire class have created more cryptocurrency? Do you know that that cryptocurrency is not a donation? It's not an investment.
It's going into their pockets. Do you understand that the moneymakers are in charge, they think. But when the people decide that we're not going to be trumped on, that we're not gonna be walked on, that we're not gonna be stomped on, that we're not gonna allow them to control our lives and push us out that when they understand that, we will win. That's it. That's it.
We've got to be prepared to be out here no matter how cold it is, no matter if it's the rain, no matter if it's snowing, we've got to be here. This is our country. This is not Elon Musk's country. This is not Trump's country. This is our country.
We deserve to have decent jobs. We deserve to have the respect. We deserve to be treated in a way that all Americans should be treated. And so let me just tell you now. I have Elon Musk's major office in my district.
He won't even meet with the local elected officials. He said he was gonna tunnel under from his office all the way to the airport so he didn't have to be among, the need for people on the ground to get to the airport. He is a low down dirty, no good person along with Trump that cannot be trusted, and we must not be afraid of them again. When the people fight We win. When the people fight We win.
When the people say that you'd better see us because we damn sure see you. Thank you very much. Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m keeping an eye on the Democrats who are vocal about Musk and DOGE. These career politicians, earning between $174K and $400K, have net worths in the tens of millions, which raises questions about their accountability. I’ve listed their estimated wealth, and it’s clear they’re upset because Musk and DOGE are shining a light on waste and corruption. If they’re truly transparent, they shouldn’t be worried. Their reactions suggest they have a lot to explain.
@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84
Keep an eye on them. 👇 These are the Democrats screaming the loudest about Musk and DOGE. I don’t want to hear another peep from these career politicians throwing tantrums over accountability. These are the same people who’ve been living large off taxpayer dollars while pretending to fight for "the little guy." Their salaries range from $174K to $400K, yet somehow their net worths are in the tens of millions. How does that math work? Spoiler: it doesn’t. Audit them all, DOGE. Let’s see how deep the swamp really goes: • Ilhan Omar: $83M • Chuck Schumer: $75M • Elizabeth Warren: $73M • Adam Schiff: $60M • Jamie Raskin: $20M • Hakeem Jeffries: $17M • Cory Booker: $14M • Jasmine Crockett: $10M These are the people crying foul because Musk and DOGE are exposing waste, fraud, and corruption. They’re not mad about accountability—they’re mad because the spotlight is finally on them. If you’re worth tens of millions on a public servant’s salary, you better believe we’re going to ask questions. And if you’ve got nothing to hide, you shouldn’t be worried. But judging by the meltdowns, it looks like they’ve got plenty to explain.
@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸
Over a decade ago, Elizabeth Warren advocated for investigating institutions that mismanaged funds and insisted on holding those responsible accountable. UNBELIEVABLE! Now that she’s on the other side of the coin, she’s championing fraud and the reckless waste of taxpayers’ dollars.
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's astonishing that the people responsible for the financial collapse are shaping the bailout. Historically, such failures resulted in job loss. Large-scale financial losses usually involve criminal activity, yet a criminal investigation is absent. We need to uncover what happened, determine if laws were broken, and identify systemic failures. I want accountability—not just blame, but a commitment to preventing future occurrences. We need to know who did what, and how to fix the system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the most astonishing part of this whole wreck now is that the very people who drove the car over the cliff have been instrumental in shaping how the American taxpayer was supposed to save it and reconstruct it. And that's really, that's really amazing. In the past, when you drove the car over the cliff, you lost your job. I was talking to someone who spent many years as a prosecutor, and he said, you know, when that much money disappears, it's usually because somebody broke some laws somewhere.
But if we don't look, if we don't ask, if we don't uncover it and make it all public, we'll never find out. Where is the criminal investigation that needs to happen here? I haven't seen it. Yeah. I I just haven't seen it at all.
What the government didn't do is it didn't turn around and say, you lost how much money and you wiped out how many pensions and you wiped out how many jobs? I wanna know who did what, whether or not any laws were violated, where the gaps are in the system that would permit this to happen. I want to hold somebody responsible. Responsibility is not just about blame. Responsibility is about making sure we fix this and it will not happen again.
@JPo1369 - Jen
A message for Elizabeth Warren. This guy is on point with a few vibrant words. Not only is he to the point, he’s got passion in his beliefs. I’m with him 💯. She doesn’t want DOGE meddling around because of her corruption. https://t.co/wvQDNEpREt
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren expressed concern over Elon Musk's access to user data on Twitter, including financial information. This prompted a response questioning the government's own access to such data. The response argued that Warren's concern is less about protecting individual citizens and more about concealing potential government misconduct, including money laundering. The response further criticizes Warren's hypocrisy, highlighting her past statements about citizens' right to know how their tax dollars are spent. Ultimately, the response asserts that the government's actions are being exposed, and it's time for accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Democratic senator Elizabeth Warren wants to be clear on a few things. Shall we clear some things up?
Speaker 1: I just wanna be clear about what's going on here. Elon and his handful of friends now have full access to your personal and financial information that's in the system. Your payment history, your Social Security number, your bank account numbers.
Speaker 2: Just a real quick news flash for anybody who's too stupid to understand that she's saying the quiet part out loud. The government, in general has access to your payment history, your Social Security number, your banking information. Now tell me, does that shit seem right? Now is she really mad that he has access to her Social Security number, her banking information, and her payment history along with all the other fucking demo quacks. Yeah.
I think that's really what it is. What? You thought this was about me and you? You thought the couple of hundred dollars we keep in our account to pay the fucking bills was something she was really worried about protecting? You gotta be kidding me.
No. It's the shit they do. The really nasty work they do. The money laundering they do. Yeah.
That'll make you upset when somebody goes digging around in all your dirty laundry and finding all the skeletons in your closet. Elon wasn't elected. You know something? You were elected. You, Elizabeth Warren, and guess what you said?
01/30/2025 and I motherfucking quote. I don't see where in the everyday common citizen shouldn't know where their fucking common dollar goes in government? The common dollar you tax them off of everything? State tax, local tax, property tax, school tax, sales tax, federal income tax. And when you're gonna do your taxes, guess what?
That gets taxed. So the everyday common citizen who gets taxed from here to kingdom fucking cum shouldn't know where their money goes? And you trying to tell me about Elon Musk not being elected to find the fucking dirty work? In the words of those who work and bust their ass all over the world, but most certainly from New York, bitch, shut the fuck up. And And in the words of the great Denzel Washington from Remember the Titans, when we ask Elon, will you ever quit?
No. We want some more. We want some more. The jig is up, you quacks. It's time to pay the piper.
Oh, god.
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Elizabeth Warren on her stance against DOGE and questioned her $12 million net worth from a $200K salary. Instead of answering, she reacted aggressively. It’s evident that politicians often evade real questions and rely on scripted responses. We must hold them accountable!
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 #BREAKING: Elizabeth Warren just ASSAULTED me on camera for asking her WHY she’s so against DOGE & transparency Or maybe it was because I asked Pocahontas how she amassed a net worth of over $12 MILLION on a $200K government salary Either way, it’s clear these clowns are NOT able to answer questions. They’re only capable of spewing talking points fed to them by their handlers/lobbyist. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE! We’re the media now.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, why the fear of transparency regarding Elon Musk's exposure of fraudulent spending? How did you accumulate a $12 million net worth on a congressional salary of $200,000? You keep trying to block my camera; this isn't a public sidewalk. You won't answer my questions. What's the problem with transparency, and why is Doge such a problem for you? You just elbowed me—I have it on camera. Transparency is your enemy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The shutdown Senator Warren, why are you so afraid of transparency? Why are you bothered by the fact that Elon Musk is attempting to expose all of this fraudulent spending? What is that about? What is the problem here? What is the problem with transparent do not touch me.
Do not touch me. Senator Warren, I just wanna answer your question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that?
Excuse me. How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're not public sidewalk. So You know what the mean?
What are you? What are you? I'm sorry. So you don't wanna answer that question. What is it about Doge that's such a problem to you?
You just elbowed me, senator. I got that on camera. Us. Thank you. Transparency is your enemy.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 LMAO! President Trump just absolutely TORCHED Elizabeth Warren, aka Pocahontas “She’s a fake—just like she said she was an Indian. You have more Indian blood than she does… She’s a nasty woman. She’s a really nasty woman. Despite her phony beer commercial.” What a LEGEND 🤣 https://t.co/mbwm2xvRrU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Freezing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) essentially gives big corporations a free pass. Elizabeth Warren, in creating the CFPB, used it to harm many good people. She's a phony; her claims of Native American heritage are false, and she leveraged those claims for personal gain and to destroy others. The CFPB was badly run, a waste of resources, and its elimination is part of our efforts to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse. It was a vicious agency that caused significant harm. Our goal is its complete removal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Regarding Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Democrats including Elizabeth Warren have said that by freezing it, it's getting big banks and giant corporations the green light
Speaker 1: to see Yeah. Pocahontas. Pocahontas is the fake the faker. You know, that was set up to destroy people. She used that as her little, personal agency to go around and destroy people.
And she's a fake. Just like she said she was an Indian, and she wasn't an Indian. You have more Indian blood in you than she has. She went to college based on the fact that she was an Indian. She got jobs based on the fact that she was an Indian.
She's a fake. That was, that was set up to destroy some very good people. And, and it worked. I mean, it worked a lot of a lot of great people. I I tell you, before I ever heard the term, people would come up to me in the Midwest in areas that say, sir, I'm being destroyed by them.
They they use that to destroy people. She's a nasty woman. She's a really nasty woman despite her phony beer commercial. Now, we did the right thing. That was a very important thing to get rid of.
Can you confirm it? And it was also a waste. I mean, number one, it was a bad group of people running it, but, it was also a waste. If you looked at when she really ran it, wow, that was a vicious group of people. They really destroyed a lot of people.
Speaker 0: And you confirm it's, your goal is to have it totally eliminated the agency?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Because we're we're trying to get rid of waste, fraud, and abuse.
reSee.it AI Summary
Maxine Waters and her team tried to take my phone twice after I questioned her stance on government transparency. She had no answers, and her reaction when I mentioned her taxpayer-funded SUV was unforgettable. We refuse to be silenced, no matter the intimidation tactics.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 #BREAKING: Maxine Waters and her entourage attempted to steal my phone TWICE after I asked her why she’s so against government transparency Democrats are VIOLENT. Of course, she had no answers, so the next step was to was to try to confiscate the device used to record her being frazzled and unable to answer questions. The look Maxine gave me when I mentioned her taxpayer funded SUV was PRICELESS 🤣 WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED. No matter how much they try to intimidate us.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Government transparency is essential. The use of taxpayer-funded vehicles, like large SUVs for members of Congress, raises questions. This lack of transparency fuels suspicion and distrust. Why are certain politicians against things like Dogecoin while enjoying these benefits? The core issue is the absence of clear explanations and accountability regarding government spending. We need to know who our representatives are and why they make the decisions they do. The lack of transparency surrounding these issues is unacceptable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She's gotta go get in her big black taxpayer funded SUV. Oh, yeah. That's what happens when you're a member of congress. No. That's what happens when you don't have transparency in the government.
Why do you deserve a big black taxpayer funded SUV? Is that why you're so against Doge? Is that what the problem is? What's up with the the lack of transparency in your What's the problem with transparency? Who the fuck are you?
Why are you push? What is the problem with those? What is the problem with this one?
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: Journalist Nick Sortor is contacting DC District Attorney Ed Martin to file assault charges against Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren: “I’m doing that right after this. I was taking punches and pushes. I was simply trying to get answers. No aggression.” https://t.co/DVJaKxm8RP
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're simply turning the tables by asking legitimate questions, like how did these members of Congress get so rich?
I think someone has to file charges for assault against these Democrat members and their staff. I'm going to reach out to the DC District Attorney to see what his jurisdiction is. This shouldn't be tolerated. I have a right protected under the First Amendment to simply ask questions. I wasn't being violent.
I'm simply trying to get an answer to a question. The only aggression there is is asking aggressive questions that they don't like. I asked Ayanna Presley if she condoned FEMA sending $59 million to house illegals in New York City while people in Western North Carolina have been living in tents for the past four months, and I got the death stare of a lifetime. I'm going to live here in DC, and I'm going to do this on a routine basis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is nothing compared to what Republicans have to deal with every single day on Capitol Hill. So Republicans, members of Congress, are constantly barraged by reporters who chase them into elevators, who harass them, who are funded by USAID in order to make their lives a living hell. And all you're doing is turning the tables and simply asking legitimate questions. This is a huge question. How did they all get so rich?
Massie Waters was named the most corrupt member of Congress. Elizabeth Warren is worth tens of millions of dollars. Nobody can figure out exactly why. So it seems completely and totally legitimate, yet you're assaulted for this. There's new sheriff in town, Nick.
Ed Martin is the new DC District Attorney appointed by president Trump. Have you considered reaching out to potentially file charges for assault against these Democrat members and their staff?
Speaker 1: No. I I think somebody definitely has to, but the the the issue that we have here is that I would have to go, as far as I'm aware, to the DC District Attorney. The the the district of, you know, the city of Washington, DC would have to be the ones to bring assault charges against these people, and the chances I mean, there's not a snowball's chance in hell that would ever happen. I mean, there's a there's a clear double standard here in Washington, DC. But, you know, Ed Martin's a good guy, man.
Just reach out. We'll just see. We'll see what his is. Well, it happened
Speaker 0: you know, the way that it works is is his jurisdiction because it happened on federal property, and this is how they were able the DC District Attorney can charge anything that happens in Washington, DC. You were in Washington, DC. And
Speaker 1: Beautiful. That's what I'll do right after this then. Well, there we go. We're getting places here on the Benny Show, man.
Speaker 0: Don't take legal yeah. Don't take legal advice, but, but I I'm I'm telling you is that that this shouldn't be this shouldn't be tolerated. You have a right. You have a right protected under the first amendment to simply ask questions. And you weren't being violent.
Right? You weren't pushing or or or you weren't pushing or fighting anyone or punching anyone? They were punching No.
Speaker 1: I was the one taking the punches and taking the pushes. That that's that that was me. I wasn't blocking anybody. I wasn't, you know, I'm not I'm not I I'm not getting in their paths. I'm, you know, simply trying to get an answer to a question.
There's no aggression. The only aggression there is is is asking aggressive questions that they don't like. Yeah. Sure. It it's as simple as that.
You know, Ayanna Presley, you you're talking about the FEMA situation. I asked her directly in the video that I'm about to post. I asked her if she condoned FEMA sending 25,000,000 or or I'm sorry, $59,000,000 to house illegals in New York City while people in Western North Carolina have been living in tents for the past four months, and I got the death stare of a lifetime. It was like a ghetto death stare, Benny. You're gonna see.
I mean, I I've never gotten that look from a congressperson before, but it's like a look of intimidation because, you know, they think that they think they're gods. These Democrat congresspeople think they are god, that they're untouchable, and that nothing will ever happen to them. And, you know, I'm I'm here in DC now. I'm gonna live here in DC, and I'm gonna do this on a routine basis. So Good.
They should be ready for it. Maybe I'll have to wear a mask like their, their masked minions so that they can't recognize me.
reSee.it AI Summary
I asked Elizabeth Warren about her $12M net worth on a $200K salary, which caught Elon Musk's attention. Today, he announced in the Oval Office that DOGE will investigate public officials with high net worths and low pay. Finally, our government is listening to us! We are the media now.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 YESTERDAY: I asked Elizabeth Warren HOW she achieved a $12M net worth on a $200K salary, prompting a reply from Elon inquiring as well TODAY: @ElonMusk announces in the Oval Office DOGE will be investigating public officials with high net worths and low pay Our government FINALLY listens to US! 🇺🇸 WE ARE THE MEDIA NOW.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, I'm curious about your financial background. How did you manage to accumulate a $12 million net worth while earning a $200,000 salary in Congress? Could you explain how you achieved that? Excuse me, I'm simply asking a question and would appreciate it if you didn't obstruct my camera. We are on a public sidewalk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Senator Warren, this is my answer question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that? Excuse me.
How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're on public sidewalk. So
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's strange to see bureaucrats with modest salaries somehow accumulate tens of millions in net worth during their service. Take USAID, for example. We wonder how they became so wealthy while in their positions. Maybe they're just brilliant investors, and we should seek their advice! But, in reality, it seems they are getting rich at the expense of taxpayers. We're looking into this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000,
Speaker 1: etcetera? Well, we we we are we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few people in in in the bureaucracy who who have a ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars, but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They, in which case, we should take their investment advice perhaps.
But, just there seems to be mysteriously they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where did it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at the taxpayer expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it.
So, you know, we're looking at, say, well, we we we would just
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
You’ll NEVER be able to make this make sense “Democrats want to audit you for a $600 Venmo payment, but when Elon Musk audits the trillion dollar government - they're ready to storm the castle. The government's been robbing us blind.” - Jesse Waters DOGE is NOT controversial https://t.co/TSUQyChyXx
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're cutting the deep state. Over 40,000 federal bureaucrats have taken buyouts, saving Americans millions. Elon and his team are streamlining agencies, Secretary of State Rubio fired 90% of USAID administrators, and the media is calling it the Trumppocalypse.
Federal workers are worried about payback, but what about the rest of us who've had to deal with DEI and cancel culture? CNN is crying for feds who don't want to return to the office, but they didn't weep for Keystone Pipeline workers.
Democrats are shocked we're putting the government on a diet, but Trump and Musk campaigned on it and won. Elon says the fraudsters are complaining the loudest. We're catching them, and Elon Musk is helping.
We're spending millions on things like tourism in Egypt, Iraqi Sesame Street, and trans surgeries in Guatemala. Biden paid billions to unnamed foreign sources. This is a government theft ring, and we're putting an end to it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Doge father's on the loose, and no federal job is safe. Their plan for the deep state gut it all. Over 40,000 federal bureaucrats have already taken buyouts, and we're only in week three.
Speaker 1: We expect that number to increase, and that that alone, just the 40,000, again, we expect it to increase. It's going to save the American people tens of millions of dollars, and we encourage federal workers in this city to accept the very generous offer. If they don't wanna show up to the office, if they wanna rip the American people off, then, they're welcome to take this buyout, and we'll find highly competent individuals who want to fill these roles.
Speaker 0: Elon and his nerd army have been combing through agencies blasting away bloat. 20 year old dozers are clashing with lazy old timers who don't know how to use a computer and are calling them idiots. And breaking news, secretary of state Marco Rubio has just fired 90% of the administrators at USAID. They took a 10,000 man agency and streamlined it to 300 employees. The media is calling it the Trumppocalypse.
CNN cast off, Oliver Darcy, says the American experiment is convulsing before our eyes, and he's flabbergasted that the media hasn't gone into round the clock special coverage. Quote, media executives need not fret about being the boy who cried wolf. The wolf is now in the barn and mauling the livestock. The Democrats in the media have never seen a president execute a mandate with speed and precision. The country voted for change, and we're watching representative government in the twenty first century.
The feds, they call that war.
Speaker 2: Nobody wants to work in this type of condition where we're gonna be in a psychological warfare for how long?
Speaker 3: Other federal workers not revealing their names because of concern over retribution described to NBC News fear and panic, an Orwellian nightmare.
Speaker 0: Federal workers are worried about payback and psychological warfare. How do you think the whole country's felt for the last twenty years? Having to tiptoe around DEI, hauled into HR for jokes, canceled for an opinion, watching Black Lives Matter light us on fire. A guy wearing a dress raped a girl in the girl's bathroom, and the girl's dad got arrested for raising his voice. A DEI bureaucrat at the Department of Justice making 6 figures who's gonna get a buyout with an eight month severage deal, they're not a victim.
CNN's putting spot shadows on feds like their lives are in danger.
Speaker 4: What is the general feeling across government amongst your fellow federal workers right now?
Speaker 5: Grief. They're angry, many that are confused, but all kind of grieving in their own way.
Speaker 4: How does it feel to be targeted for the work that you're so passionate about? It's okay. You could take your time.
Speaker 5: It actually makes me proud of the people that I've worked with and the things that we've done.
Speaker 0: CNN's spot chatting a woman who's worked from home, and now she's crying because she doesn't wanna go back to the office? This is insane. CNN just laid off hundreds of employees to cut costs because their books aren't balanced because no one's watching them. No one's interviewing fired CNN staff, not even Don Lemon. Getting fired isn't a war crime.
I've been fired four times, and thank God because it turned out alright. Since when has CNN cared about people losing their jobs? They didn't weep when Biden waxed the Keystone Pipeline Workers. CNN's been trying to get everybody fired at Fox for years. If CNN doesn't like what you say, they call your boss, they call your advertisers, They try to bankrupt you and boycott you.
Random Americans who crack jokes on Facebook. CNN was putting them on blast, trying to get them canceled. CNN cheered on Biden for firing army officers who didn't get vaxxed. Guys who are willing to die for this country. CNN said, good.
Get them out of here. CNN's boss can lay off people. Why can't Trump? Bill Clinton fired almost 400,000 federal workers. That wasn't a constitutional crisis.
The government had to slim down. Bill and Newt cut the fat, balanced the budget, and Democrats are acting like we're witnessing a genocide.
Speaker 6: Let me remind you who set the house on fire. It was y'all. It feels as if y'all have just decided that y'all are gonna castrate your constitutional duty and hand it over to someone who is unelected.
Speaker 0: Fire Elon Musk. Elon Musk took control of our country's financial nuclear codes.
Speaker 7: House Republicans have allowed billionaire Elon Musk and his gang of thieves to enter the US Treasury Department, fire the people entrusted with secret private information about Americans, and give them that access.
Speaker 0: Elon Musk is destroying our federal government. He feels he bought himself a president.
Speaker 8: Now we've got Donald Trump and his co president, Elon Musk, and they're just running a wrecking ball through it.
Speaker 0: Democrats wanna audit you for a $600 Venmo payment. But when Elon audits the trillion dollar government, they're ready to storm the castle. Why are Democrats shocked? We're putting the government on a diet. Trump and Musk campaigned on it and won on it.
Speaker 5: We're gonna be very open and transparent and be very clear about this is what we're doing. Here are the issues. The this is this is the the math for what what's being spent and and what, you know, and and we're we're gonna make it we're gonna make the spending lower. And if if somebody's got a better idea for how to make the spending lower, we're tell us. But but if we don't, we're gonna bankrupt the country.
Speaker 9: I will create a government efficiency commission task with conducting totally eliminate fraud and improper payments within six months. This will save trillions of dollars, trillions.
Speaker 0: Democrats aren't surprised this is Trump's agenda. They're surprised he's able to execute it because after years of incompetence, no one thought anyone was capable of doing anything in Washington. Elon says there's a way to know when you're over the target.
Speaker 5: One of the things I remember from the PayPal days was that, you know, who complains the loudest, is the fraudsters. Okay? So, like, the so so when when somebody was trying to commit fraud or PayPal, where we would see the most amount of righteous indignation, like, it would be like immediate over the top righteous indignation was from the fraudsters, not from honest people. Because honest people are like, oh, I think there's something wrong with my account. I guess I wonder what's wrong.
Let me inquire. And and but the fraudsters will come at you immediately. The the this is it's like a it's like a tell you that that someone's actually doing fraud because the level of of sort of foe outrage is way over the top.
Speaker 0: Elon doesn't care about bad press. He's trying to save the republic. It's good cop, bad cop. Trump's the good cop. He's the bad cop.
Speaker 9: We're catching him left and right. We're catching him. We're catching him to a point where they don't know what the heck is going on. They can't believe they're getting caught. And I have great respect for the people that are doing it.
Elon Musk is helping us on it, and he's pretty good. He's pretty good.
Speaker 0: The government's been robbing us blind. We've been writing checks, 6,000,000 for tourism in Egypt. Like, Egypt needs help with that. They have the pyramids. We should be spending money on cleaning up California so that tourists can vacation in California.
Two million to help the BBC value the diversity of Libyan society. We're bribing the BBC to cover Libya better? Why? A million for a gay group in Armenia. There it is.
We paid 20,000,000 for Iraqi Sesame Street. You paid for Bert and Ernie in Baghdad. Weren't we just bombing these people? Now we're paying for their Muppet shows? We're sick.
There is something sick with us. You also paid for an Irish DEI musical.
Speaker 10: On behalf of ambassador Cronin, it is an honor to welcome all of her guests to Deerfield tonight for this important event. Increasing access to opportunity and equity is a cornerstone of the Biden administration, and we're so proud to play a small part in that here.
Speaker 0: This is a government theft ring. We spent $2,000,000 for trans surgeries in Guatemala. I'm gonna go out on a limb. One Guatemalan dude got breast implants, and we probably kicked back the rest of the cash to a crooked Guatemalan politician and the corrupt liberal CEO of the group they laundered the money through. Because all this money we're spending, we could have turned the whole world trans.
We could have made every man a woman and every woman a man with this kind of money. Do you really think it costs 20,000,000 to produce an episode of Sesame Street? You could hire Tom Cruise to play Oscar the Grouch for that money. Check this. Biden paid nearly $5,000,000,000 to unnamed foreign sources.
Whoever's getting our money is so shady, our government can't even put it in writing. They just call it aid. I bet a lot of this money is to bribe foreign officials to win bids for American companies or to bribe foreign politicians just to have in our pockets or just to subsidize far left foundations. Most of the people getting money from these grants aren't in the country. They pump it into overseas organizations, and then we never see them.
Any liberal with an international women's studies degree can launch a five zero one c three, apply for a government grant, and spin it off into a left wing piggy bank. USAID paid $235,000,000 to the National Democratic Institute. K. Well, that sounds benign. No.
Millions of that money went to executive compensation, meaning salaries for all the liberals with no skills. I bet most of that money didn't go to supporting democracy. It went to supporting liberal lifestyles. Democrats have been sucking off the teat of government for decades, and Trump caught them. As one Trump insider says, you bring USAID to heal and you end the Democrat gravy train.
USAID is just the beginning. You start peeling back at the layers of every agency, and all you find out is pork that winds up in the wrong people's pockets.
Speaker 11: The White Coat Waste Project exposed more than $10,000,000 in taxpayer funds that were spent creating transgender mice, rats, and monkeys. The Biden Harris administration spent 2,500,000.0 taxpayer dollars, 2 point 5 million taxpayer dollars to study the fertility of trans gender mice. We spent over a million dollars, to find out if female rats receiving testosterone therapy, were more likely to overdose on a date rape drug.
Speaker 0: One of those multimillion dollar studies was at the University of Michigan. How much do you wanna bet? A Democrat wants to go to a game at Ann Arbor. Front row seats. Anyone from the Biden team wants to land at Ann Arbor.
Here's an office, a campus, an apartment, and a no show job with benefits. Governments fed the pigs so much it turned into a hog. You know what happens to hogs? They get slaughtered. And the American people love a good butcher.
Speaker 12: This political party, the Democratic party have lied to us about everything. What the last several weeks have proven to us all is that this was a part this is a cadre of criminals and losers and spoiled children of affluent parents
Speaker 7: who were more
Speaker 12: concerned about looking good than actually doing good. Now we come to USAID being probably the largest money laundering operation in American history. Congratulations, Dembs. You've outdone you've outdone even Bernie Madoff.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Stole a million dollars of taxpayer money? 🤔
@TaraBull808 - TaraBull
Elizabeth Warren salary: $285,000/yr Net worth: $67,000,000 Wants to stop YOU from finding out where your money goes. https://t.co/CNBiTZD9sY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's what Elon is up to. First, he signaled his intentions with the "CFPB RIP" tweet, followed by his team locking out CFPB staff. Now, he's pushing Congress to block a CFPB rule, which would give his payment app free rein without regulatory oversight, allowing him to potentially exploit users without consequences.
But it's a three-part plan. Part one aimed to temporarily shut down financial watchdogs. Part two involves dismantling rules that would hold Elon accountable. Next week, Republicans will try to pass legislation enabling Elon to launch "X money" as a stablecoin, free from consumer protections, national security measures, and safeguards for financial stability. Essentially, they're paving the way for billionaires to control our money and payment systems, impacting the entire economy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's pretty clear what Elon's play is here. He wasn't very subtle when he tweeted CFPB RIP. The next thing you know, his Doge team then locks the CFPB staff out of their own building. That was act one. Now he wants act two.
He wants congress to block this CFPB rule. So what will Elon get out of it if the rule is blocked? Well, he will get a clear runway for his payment app without having to worry about whether there's a cop on the financial beat who would catch him if he rips off customers who use his new app. But this is really a three part play, not just a two part play. Act one was closing down the CFPB so that the financial cops were shut out at least for a while.
Act two is the part we see now with Elon rolling back a rule that when the cops are back on the beat, a financial cop could use to use that rule to go after Elon if he breaks the law. Act three comes next week when Republicans try to move forward with legislation that will clear the decks for Elon to issue x money as his own stablecoin without any guardrails to protect consumers, to protect national security, or to protect the financial stability of our economy. Put simply, Republicans are setting the stage for the richest man in the world to issue his own currency that competes with the US dollar. Act one protected all the scammers. Act two protects the cash app scammers in particular.
And act three, as currently drafted, will roll out the red carpet for Elon and Jeff and Mark and maybe a few other big tech billionaires to seize control of our money and payments, which underpins the entire economy.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Where did Senator Karen get $67 million?
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
🚨Sen Joni Ernst gets booed after she announces that DOGE has saved American taxpayers $115 billion since January. Keep it up, Democrats. You’re doing just great. https://t.co/Pflpt310Ad
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since January, Doge has saved $115 billion. This amounts to $714 per taxpayer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Iowa. Mister president, since January, Doge has saved $115,000,000,000. That's that's amounts to Order. Please. That amounts to $714 per taxpayer.
@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt
Catherine McKenna blocked me for asking if she found the BILLIONS misplaced under her watch. When an independent journalist confronted her today, he was assaulted and ejected. This is how govt treats questioners, yet they harass you for being $2.00 short on your taxes. https://t.co/Vs4tOdtJMQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support.
Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna tell you, this is the most important election in most of our lifetimes.
Speaker 1: The threats that Trump has
Speaker 0: made against our economy, against our workers, but against our sovereignty are completely unacceptable. We need to stand up to them, and we need to stand strong like Canadians are doing. I've been in our attorney for a long time. Our kids actually grew up together. He is the leader to get this done, so we need to support him.
Speaker 1: Catherine, didn't you lose track of 20,000 contracts? $236,000,000,000.
Speaker 0: So listen, guys. 2 things I would
Speaker 1: That's actually accurate. That's why you're not in parliament any longer.
Speaker 0: You know what? We're actually trying to have an
Speaker 1: Didn't you lose track of 20,000 contracts?
Speaker 0: No. I just
Speaker 1: Yes. You did. $236,000,000,000. 2 hundred go fuck yourself. 236,000,000,000 dolls.
I should talk to McAfee. Jimmy Lures, twenty thousand contracts. $236,000,000,000. I'm to see
Speaker 0: I'm
Speaker 1: here you. Go fuck yourself.
Speaker 0: Buddy. Spencer,
Speaker 1: nice to meet you. Buddy. Hey, Catherine McKenna. What do you have to say to that? What do you have to say for that, Catherine?
Speaker 0: Body. Body. Word.
Speaker 1: What do you have to say for yourself, Catherine? Yeah. Fucking nothing. That's what? Body.
That's what? Don't touch me. Idiot. No. No.
Place
Speaker 0: me. $236,000,000,000,
Speaker 1: Catherine.
Speaker 0: Come on. You're disrupting this.
Speaker 1: No shit. $236,000,000,000, Catherine. How much did you lose track of, Catherine? This is private property. Do you own it?
You guys are all fucking retarded. Everyone, you're all fucking retarded. No shit, stupid.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
WATCH: @LoomerUnleashed @TheCharlesDowns just confronted Democrat Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett @RepJasmine and asked her why she’s running around with tax payer funded security when she’s the violent person who goes around physically attacking independent journalists. https://t.co/WTPS3tAdo1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Crockett is questioned about using taxpayer-funded private security. The questioner claims Crockett initiated physical contact and asks for an apology. Crockett does not respond or apologize.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman Crockett, why are you running around with taxpayer funded private security when you're the one who hit me first? Would you like to apologize for your actions, congresswoman? You don't wanna apologize, congresswoman?
@amuse - @amuse
DOGE: Why is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse such a huge critic of DOGE and Elon Musk? Turns out he's been funneling millions to an NGO that pays his wife millions. His wife isn't paid by just one government funded NGO but two including the Atlantic Council. The corruption is deep.
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
Elizabeth Warren eventually “apologized” for insulting Native American tribes after a 1986 state bar association registration emerged that showed she claimed American Indian heritage. So cringe. It ended with a reporter asking if Warren would drop out of the presidential race. https://t.co/0BhnFxhJii
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is questioned about listing as an American Indian on a Texas bar application 30 years ago, despite not being a tribal citizen. The speaker says they learned about their family history from family stories while growing up in Oklahoma, but acknowledges the distinction of tribal citizenship.
The speaker denies using this background to get ahead, stating investigations have shown it had no impact on their employment. When asked about other potential documents, the speaker reiterates consistency with their understanding at the time, based on family stories, and apologizes for not being more mindful of tribal citizenship and sovereignty.
The speaker has not spoken with Chief Baker since the recent incident but emphasizes the apology is for insensitivity towards tribal citizenship and sovereignty. When asked how voters will react, the speaker says it comes from the heart, is about family, and is an apology for harm caused.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why did you list yourself as an American Indian on on this Texas bar application?
Speaker 1: So this was about thirty years ago, and, I am not a tribal citizen. Tribes and only tribes determine citizenship. When I was growing up, in Oklahoma, I learned about my family the same way most people do. My brothers and I learned from our mom and our dad and our brothers and our sisters, and those were our family stories. But that said, there really is an important distinction of tribal citizenship.
I am not a member of a tribe, and I have apologized for not being more sensitive to that distinction. It's an important distinction.
Speaker 0: The president has made the case that you've used this part of your background to get ahead. Are you saying that this is something you fundamentally believed about yourself, or how do you respond to that criticism? This was a a knowing attempt to get ahead by using that claim of ancestry.
Speaker 1: So that is a claim that has been fully investigated, and it has now been shown completely that nothing about my background ever had anything to do with any job I got in any place. It's been fully documented and there's no evidence of any kind other than it had nothing to do. My back
Speaker 0: and my back nothing to Is there any documents or any more forms like this out there that you have listed yourself as that could come out?
Speaker 1: Look. This is who I grew up believing with my brothers. This is our family story, and it's all consistent from that point in time. But as I said, it's important to note, I'm not a tribal citizen, and I should have been more just more mindful of the distinction with tribal citizenship and tribal sovereignty. And that is why I apologize to chief Baker and why I've made a very public apology.
Speaker 2: So your senator does that before formally born
Speaker 1: with you? Could there be other documents out there with you self identifying as American Indian? So all I know is during this time period, this is consistent with what I did because it was based on my understanding from my family's stories, but family stories are not the same as tribal citizenship. And this is why I have apologized both to chief Baker who was very gracious about it and have apologized.
Speaker 2: But senator, this most recent incident just came out yesterday. Have you spoken with him, with chief Baker since this new incident was released? And have you heard from any native American tribes or groups today since that information came out yesterday?
Speaker 1: So I haven't spoken with anyone since I saw this information. No. But my apology is an apology for not having been more sensitive about tribal citizenship and tribal sovereignty. I'll I really wanna underline the point. Tribes and only tribes determine tribal citizenship.
It is an issue of tribal sovereignty.
Speaker 0: How do you think voters will react
Speaker 1: to this? I'm sorry? Oh. How do
Speaker 0: you think voters will react to this?
Speaker 1: You know, I'm I'm sure there are pundits who will have an answer for that. But understand, this is from the heart. This is about my family, my brothers, and it is about an apology from the heart. An apology for not being more sensitive to tribal citizenship and tribal sovereignty, and for harm caused.
Speaker 0: Have you considered dropping out of the race?
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Maxine Waters about her statements encouraging violence against ICE agents. During our exchange, she attempted to have someone call Capitol Police, but they supported me instead. One of her supporters chased me down and had a meltdown. Maxine tried to evade accountability by taking photos with her supporters, but I pressed her on key issues. She refused to condemn illegal immigrants receiving taxpayer-funded healthcare, rioters in Los Angeles, and assaults on ICE agents. It's frustrating that she can't answer these straightforward questions. Why do we pay her salary?
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 BREAKING: I just confronted Maxine Waters about the LIES she’s spewing, and how she’s ENCOURAGING vioIence against ICE agents She then tried to have one of her goons call Capitol Police, but they sided with me 🤣 So the goon CHASED ME and MELTED DOWN. They can’t help themselves 😂 Ole Maxine tried to evade me by taking pictures with astroturfed supporters. Didn’t work. But here’s the rundown: ❌ She REFUSED to condemn illegals getting taxpayer funded healthcare ❌ She REFUSED to condemn rioters burning down Los Angeles ❌ She REFUSED to condemn assauIts on ICE agents These are SIMPLE QUESTIONS that she can’t even answer. Why the hell do we pay these people’s salaries anymore??!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 questions a congresswoman about taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants and condemns violent riots in Los Angeles. Speaker 0 does not answer. Speaker 0 then challenges others to harass him as they allegedly harassed the congresswoman. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 to condemn the violent riots in Los Angeles. Speaker 0 declines to answer and asks who Speaker 1 is. Speaker 1 attempts to continue the conversation, but Speaker 0 walks away. Speaker 1 then asks Speaker 0 if he has a foreskin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Harass me. Harass me. Dude, you tried to get the police on me. Between me. I just
Speaker 1: have to ask you. It seems like you're you're advocating for millions of illegals to be paid their their health could be paid for by tax payers. Is that is that wrong? Because your constituents are having to pay for the health insurance of millions illegals brought in by Joe Biden. Do do you condemn that?
Is that not a problem? No? Come on. It's a pretty easy question. You can you can you can you can condemn it.
You can say, yes. I do support it. I mean, your your Officer. Your lack of an answer oh, yeah. Call the police on me for asking a a a congresswoman a question.
That's exactly what you're doing. That's fine. No. It's okay. So so, I mean, can I can I get a quick answer to that question?
Quick answer to that question. Do you support illegals getting taxpayer funded health care?
Speaker 0: You're my hero. It's incredible. We pay
Speaker 1: these salaries.
Speaker 0: We pay the payers pay the salaries, and we can't even get an answer to the question. We're not gonna stay in the room.
Speaker 1: Say thank you. Thank you. You tried. You tried. But it's not it's not gonna work.
I'm gonna continue to ask questions, bud.
Speaker 0: In 4.
Speaker 1: We need 4. We
Speaker 0: need 4. Dude, you tried to call the police. What are you talking about? Just this
Speaker 1: is a yaw. It didn't work. Alright. Let's make the let's do a little bit of an easier one here at this point. How about condemning the violent riots in Los Angeles?
Are you willing to do that at least? I mean I mean, come on.
Speaker 0: We're we're we're we're we're talking about people that were
Speaker 1: setting buildings and cars on fire, assaulting ICE agents.
Speaker 0: We're trying to I want you to back up. Can we do that? I want you don't don't don't say anything.
Speaker 1: Alright. Condemn yeah. Don't say anything. Don't say anything. You're right.
That's probably not a good idea.
Speaker 0: Getting the flow.
Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. So alright. So not gonna condemn not gonna condemn the violent riots in Los Angeles. This is this is amazing.
This is the Democrat party.
Speaker 0: You know what? Don't impede the flow. I just harassed that lady. And all these Christian people here, now harass me the same way you just want. We can disagree, but harass me.
Harass me. Dude, you tried to get the police on between me and you, Harriet. I ain't afraid of you. So harass me the way you just had harass that lady. And your brother there that's laughing about it?
Harass me. No. No. No. No.
No. Bro, you know me. Coming down. Harass me. I dare you.
Harass me the way you just harassed her. You're the one that just chased me down bro. Harass me. You'll be okay. You'll be okay.
Be okay. You walking away. You keep walking with me.
Speaker 1: Are you on to? Delays.
Speaker 0: Harass me. Talking about? Just harassed that lady. How about you what are you even talking about? Question you want.
Just I don't know who you are. Why the fuck am I gonna talk to you? Who are you? The the way you harass me. Who are you?
Harass me the way you Are you going to tell me who you are,
Speaker 1: or you just gonna stand here and
Speaker 0: hang on. Okay. So we're
Speaker 1: not Alright. So this is going nowhere.
Speaker 0: I'll harass
Speaker 1: to keep walking with me if you want to.
Speaker 0: Alright. Okay. Well, you just ran
Speaker 1: from all the way over there. So assuming you
Speaker 0: you you you want me to see you leaving. Leaving. Okay. Are you gonna say anything productive?
Speaker 1: See who you are.
Speaker 0: So you're not gonna tell me who you are. I see you leave.
Speaker 1: Come with me. You just support channel Come with me, dude. You just ran, like, a 100 yards to come get me.
Speaker 0: Like, you can you can keep walking if you want to.
Speaker 1: You got no foreskin. I'm just waiting Do you have a foreskin, man? Wait. Wait.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
NEW: Senator Warren looks like she is about to have an aneurysm as RFK Jr. calls her out for allegedly accepting $855,000 from pharmaceutical companies. Warren: *Unhinged screeching* RFK: "I know you've taken $855,000 from pharmaceutical companies, Senator." https://t.co/bhTIIxmKCT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Sanders pressed Secretary Kennedy on booster eligibility, asking if all adults and children over six months are eligible to get a COVID booster at pharmacy. Kennedy: 'Anybody can get the booster.' Sanders noted it is 'not recommended for healthy people' and argued that changing the classification could deny access; Kennedy said, 'We're not gonna recommend a product for which there's no clinical data for that indication.' Sanders warned the policy would 'take away vaccines from anyone who wanted them,' while Kennedy replied, 'I'm not taking them away from people,' and added, 'Most Americans will be able to get it from a pharmacy for free.' 'And first up is ratifying your COVID actions. Second is hepatitis b is on the agenda.' Kennedy: 'I'm not taking vaccines away from anybody.' Later, Kennedy said, 'No. I told her that she had to resign because I asked her, are you a trustworthy person?'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's clear this up right now, secretary Kennedy. Will you tell America that all adults and all children over six months of age are eligible to get a COVID booster at their local pharmacy today?
Speaker 1: Anybody can get the booster.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry?
Speaker 1: Anybody can get it.
Speaker 0: Anybody. So you're saying that is now the official rule of HHS. Anybody is eligible to get a booster by just walking
Speaker 1: into It's the not recommended for healthy people.
Speaker 0: No. No. If you don't recommend, then the consequence of that in many states is that you can't walk into a pharmacy and get one. It means insurance companies don't have to cover the $200 or so cost. As senator doctor Cassidy said, you are effectively denying people vaccines.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna recommend a product for which there's no clinical data for that indication. Would you is that what I should be doing?
Speaker 0: What you should be doing is honoring your promise that you made when you were looking to get confirmed in this job
Speaker 1: You're going like this.
Speaker 0: That is you promised that you would not take away vaccines from anyone who wanted them. You just changed the classification of the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 1: I'm not taking them away from people, senator.
Speaker 0: It takes it away if you can't get it from your pharmacist.
Speaker 1: Well, most Americans are gonna be able to get it from their pharmacy for free. Dollars. Most Americans will be able to get it from their pharmacy for free.
Speaker 0: Is everyone who wants it, that was your promise.
Speaker 1: I know I didn't never promised that I was gonna recommend products with which there
Speaker 0: is no indication. When you said
Speaker 1: And I know you've taken $855,000 from pharmaceutical companies, senator.
Speaker 0: Did you hold up a big sign saying that you were lying when you said that because you are the one who said you would not take them away? Now senator I'm
Speaker 1: not taking them away from anything. Secretary You want me to indicate a product for which there is no clinical data? Senator Is that what you want?
Speaker 0: Secretary Kennedy, you said you wouldn't, and now you did. I'm not taking
Speaker 1: them away. Everybody can get access to them.
Speaker 0: No. They can't walk into a pharmacy the way they could last month and get access
Speaker 1: It depends on the state. Depends on the state. A year ago But they can still get it. Everybody can get it. Ago.
It Everybody can get it, senator.
Speaker 0: So look. Let's move on. You clearly are taking away vaccines. I've seen the list for what's coming up next, and that is the agenda for the next CDC vaccine panel. And first up is ratifying your COVID actions.
Second is hepatitis b is on the agenda. So should Americans expect you to take away hepatitis vaccine access as well even though you promise not to?
Speaker 1: As I said, I'm not taking vaccines away from anybody.
Speaker 0: If the Same answer. Right? You're just gonna deny that when people can't get access that you're not taking it away. Then let me ask you, is that the same game you're gonna play with me You want me
Speaker 1: to so you want me to recommend every product in the world No. So that without any clinical trial data. Through on your promises. Yeah. My promise was to give
Speaker 0: A month ago, we could get COVID vaccines by just walking
Speaker 1: You can still get COVID vaccines, senator.
Speaker 0: Taking that away.
Speaker 1: No. You are still you can still get the COVID vaccines and Medicare will still pay for them and Medicaid will still pay.
Speaker 0: Head of the CDC that if she refused to sign off on your changes to the childhood vaccine schedule that she had to resign?
Speaker 1: No. I told her that she had to resign because I asked her, are you a trustworthy person? And she said no. If you had an employee who told you they weren't trustworthy, would you ask them
Speaker 0: to resign senator? So I'm sorry but this is not what she has said publicly. She has Well said I'm not surprised about So you're saying she's lying?
Speaker 1: Yes. Every conversation I had with her And me
Speaker 0: get this straight. This is the same person that less than a month earlier, you stood next to her and described her as unimpeachable and you had full confidence in her and that you had full confidence in her scientific credentials. And in a month she became a liar? Yeah.
Speaker 1: You should ask her what changed. And by the way, a month ago you were voting against her. Oh, because you thought she was either incompetent, ineligible, unsuited to the task.
Speaker 0: Was afraid she was gonna bend the knee to you and Donald Trump. And it looks like she didn't bend the knee, so you fired her. Look. You are putting America's baby's health at risk, America's seniors' health at risk, all Americans' health at risk, and you should resign.
Speaker 1: Senator Sanders.