reSee.it - Related Post Feed

SteB777
Posted - February 18, 2023 at 12:22 PM
Saved - February 18, 2023 at 12:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Climate crisis deniers are either stupid or dishonest. Greta Thunberg's arguments are based on science, not personal credibility. The scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change is supported by physics and empirical evidence. Contrarian scientists receive fossil fuel industry funding and their arguments are flawed. Climate crisis denial is easily refuted.

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

As climate crisis deniers either seem to very hard of thinking i.e. stupid, or simply disingenuous liars who have no interests in the truth, let me offer some advice. Your arguments are just plain stupid, or knowingly dishonest. 1/🧵

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Often you see Greta Thunberg being attacked, by these inarticulate stupid people, with the usual refrain of what qualifications does she have in climate science. When you are referencing the science, and all you say is consistent with that, you don't need qualifications. 2/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

When you are rigorously referencing the science, the veracity of your argument, rests on your references i.e. the science, not you personally. As long as you don't deviate from it, re-interpret it, the foundation of your argument is the science you reference, not on you. 3/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Greta is very careful to check her understanding of the science, with leading scientists. So none of what she says, is based on believing in her as a person. Which is why attacking her personally, is just stupid, or downright malicious and knowingly dishonest. 4/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Only if you are disputing the scientific consensus, do you need extraordinary qualifications, and most importantly, massive and overwhelming evidence. No matter what qualifications you've got, it is meaningless if you can't support your point. 5/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

All published papers, denying the consensus on anthropogenic climate change, have all been found to be littered with basic errors and mistakes. There is no published research, that contradicts the scientific consensus, not devoid of basic errors. https://qz.com/1069298/the-3-of-scientific-papers-that-deny-climate-change-are-all-flawed 6/

Those 3% of scientific papers that deny climate change? A review found them all flawed Scientists who deny climate change are not modern-day Galileos. qz.com

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Not only do the handful of climatologists who dispute the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change, all by no coincidence, receive fossil fuel industry funding, but what they claim doesn't stand up to scrutiny. They can't support their claims with science. 7/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

And as we've seen from above, when these contrarian scientists are stupid enough to publish their half-baked ideas, the examination of their arguments, is found to be full of basic errors and flaws. 8/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

So no, attacking Greta Thunberg, or whichever other personality malicious deniers chose to try and smear, has no impact on the science. Because none of the science, relies on anyone's personal credibility, it is all based on the evidence. 9/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

No, climate science isn't all based on modelling as deniers repeatedly falsely claim. It's based on physics and empirical evidence. Yes, like all fields of science, climate science uses models. The models used, have mainly turned out to be correct. https://www.science.org/content/article/even-50-year-old-climate-models-correctly-predicted-global-warming 10/

Even 50-year-old climate models correctly predicted global warming Study debunks idea that older models were inaccurate science.org

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

This is why I now refuse to debate the specifics of the science with climate crisis deniers. Because they have absolutely no case. This is why they have to resort to ad hominem attacks on honest people like Greta Thunberg, referencing the science, because they have no case. 11/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Note how I use the term climate crisis denier i.e. anyone who disputes that anthropogenic climate change is a crisis. It is to get around the dishonest argument, that they are not disputing climate change, because it is always changing. 12/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

By the way, that is another stupid argument. No the climate is not always changing, that is the weather. Climate stays remarkably consistent over long periods of time. That is the reason for those identifiably geological periods, and how species evolve to adapt to climate. 13/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

It takes many thousands of years, often hundreds of thousands or millions of years, for species to evolve. Primarily to adapt to climate regimes. If the climate just constantly, randomly changed, species and ecosystems couldn't adapt to it. 14/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

And yes, climate does change, sometimes rapidly, and not due to human impacts in the past. But this does nothing to contradict the evidence that the reason for the current climate change, is anthropogenic carbon emissions. 15/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Oh, that's disappointing, I've dealt with climate crisis denial in only 15 tweets. Normally I go on a bit longer than that, but climate crisis denial is empty of any basis, so easily dealt with. 16/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

Just to add the proviso, that I have referred to climate crisis deniers as stupid, malignly malicious etc, not as an insult, but because denying overwhelming evidence, can only be achieved with stupidity or malicious dishonesty. 17/

@SteB777 - Stephen Barlow

@threadreaderapp Please unroll?

print3_d
Posted - May 12, 2023 at 8:08 AM
Saved - February 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk, Jordan Peterson, and Pierre Poilievre are seen as part of the "controlled WEF opposition" by the author. They are accused of pretending to be on our side while actually working towards agenda 2030. The author suggests listening to Grimes, Elon's ex, for more information.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

Elon Musk is a Globalist, playing on the same side as Jordan Peterson & Pierre Poilievre. They are what I call the "controlled WEF opposition." They play the good guys, while actually trying to guide us towards agenda 2030. This is Grimes Elon's EX.. listen carefully. https://t.co/YZmJJocVuM

Video Transcript AI Summary
AI could be the fastest way to achieve communism. If implemented correctly, it could solve scarcity and provide everyone with a comfortable life without the need to work. AI could automate farming, eliminate corruption, and bring us closer to genuine equality. It offers all the benefits of communism without the downside of collective farming, which is not desirable.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a proposition for the communists. So, typically, most of the communists I know are not big fans of AI. But if you think about it, AI is actually the fastest path to communism. So if implemented correctly, AI could actually Theoretically, solve for abundance. Like, we could totally get to a situation where nobody has to work. Everybody is provider for with a Comfortable state of being, comfortable living. AI could automate all the farming, weed out systematic corruption, thereby bringing us to As close as possible to genuine equality. So basically, everything that everybody loves about communism, but without the collective farm. Because let's be real, enforced farming is really not a vibe.

@print3_d - PRINT3D

@reSeeIt save thread

bambkb
Posted - October 3, 2023 at 12:04 AM
Saved - October 4, 2023 at 6:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Morgan Vague's groundbreaking discovery: a bacteria that transforms plastic into harmless enzymes. Despite its significance, she lost to Greta Thunberg, who holds a doctorate from the University of Helsinki. Our institutions seem bewildered. #Environment #Innovation

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

Morgan Vague created a bacteria that can eat plastic and turn it into harmless enzymes It’s probably one of the most important discoveries ever and she should’ve probably won ‘person of the year’ for this!! She ended up losing to Greta Thunberg The same, Greta Thunberg that got a DOCTORATE from the University of Helsinki Our governments and institutions have completely lost their minds #MorganVague

bambkb
Posted - December 9, 2023 at 3:27 PM
Saved - December 9, 2023 at 10:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Morgan Vague's groundbreaking discovery: a plastic-eating bacteria that transforms it into harmless enzymes. Despite its significance, she lost to Greta Thunberg, who holds a doctorate from the University of Helsinki. Our institutions seem to have lost their minds.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨Morgan Vague discovered a bacteria that can eat plastic and turn it into harmless enzymes🔥🔥 It’s probably one of the most important discoveries EVER and she should’ve probably won ‘person of the year’ for this!! She ended up losing to Greta Thunberg🤡 The same, Greta Thunberg that got a DOCTORATE from the University of Helsinki🤡🤡🤡 Our governments and institutions have completely lost their minds #MorganVague

patel_patriot
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 6:01 PM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 12:47 PM

@patel_patriot - Jon Herold

Lol Grok basically calling @elonmusk a hypocrite https://t.co/OaJrZ8cpDK

ChrisMartzWX
Posted - June 30, 2024 at 4:16 PM
Saved - June 30, 2024 at 11:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author compares themselves to Greta Thunberg, highlighting their qualifications in studying climate as an atmospheric science major. They criticize climate alarmists for disregarding experts and instead listening to Greta's uninformed testimonies. The author also criticizes European leaders for making energy policy decisions based on youth activism, resulting in unstable energy grids and price hikes. They argue that "net zero" only reduces the quality of life.

@ChrisMartzWX - Chris Martz

Greta Thunberg and I are the same age. I’m a senior atmospheric science major who studies climate; she is an activist and the UN’s climate prodigy with zero formal education on this subject. Climate alarmists habitually appeal to scientific authority [only if it suits their creed], but they claim I’m not “qualified” and ignore experts like Dr. Judith Curry, Dr. Patrick Brown or Dr. John Christy, and instead listen to her uninformed testimonies that are nothing more than cultish, politically-charged doomsday rants that aren’t in the least supported by the body of scientific work. Bureaucrats and world leaders over in Europe have made grossly miscalculated energy policy decisions based on youth activism, creating energy grids with an unstable fuel mix too heavily reliant on intermittent solar and wind, which don’t produce enough energy when it is needed most, resulting in price hikes. In Germany, nuclear has been dismantled and they have had to burn coal and wood to stay warm during the winter. The only thing “net zero” reduces is the quality of life.

e_galv
Posted - November 7, 2024 at 5:04 PM
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 1:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some intriguing history about Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, who led Technocracy Incorporated in Canada. This organization, active from 1936 to 1941, aimed to restructure society based on scientific principles, envisioning a unified Technate where all needs would be met. I questioned why people support Musk's vision of a new order, merging AI with human will and creating "The Everything App," while simultaneously opposing WEF policies. It seems there's a contradiction in accepting a New World Order as long as Musk is at the helm.

@e_galv - Just.A.Thought 💭

Elon Musk's grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, was a leader of Technocracy Incorporated in Canada from 1936 to 1941. "Technocracy Incorporated was not a political movement – in fact, politicians or members of political parties were not allowed to join. It was founded in New York City in 1933 as an educational and research organization promoting a radical restructuring of political, social and economic life in Canada and the United States, with science as its central operating principle. There would be no countries called Canada or the United States – just one giant continental land mass called the Technate, a techno-utopia run by engineers and other “experts” in their fields. In the Technate, everyone would be well-housed and fed. All material needs would be taken care of, whether you had a job or not." Why when Elon Musk talks about a "new order of the ages", merging AI with human will, implanting brain chips in human brains, and creating "The Everything App" while calling himself the "Techno King"... people cheer? But on the other side of their mouth, say they're against WEF policies? How do they reconcile the fact that they actually accept a New World Order, so long as Elon Musk spearheads it? Can anyone answer this?

raymo_g
Posted - December 26, 2024 at 1:38 PM
Saved - December 27, 2024 at 1:00 AM

@raymo_g - Ray

Wow They ratioed Elon Musk and now their account is gone 💀 https://t.co/eFL3waI3Zd

ViralNewsNYC
Posted - December 27, 2024 at 7:34 AM
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 12:09 PM

@ViralNewsNYC - Viral News NYC

Apparently, comrade Musk thinks anyone who disagrees with him are submissive retards. subtards huh ?

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@HansCNelson My tolerance for subtards is limited

Uncommonsince76
Posted - December 30, 2024 at 8:05 PM
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 12:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that if there were a conspiracy by Jews to undermine the White race, it would be openly discussed and documented, like the Kalergi Plan. I suggest that Jewish intellectuals promote ideas like multiculturalism and open borders to dilute White identity. I point out the influence of Jewish-led corporations and political figures in shaping immigration policies and media narratives. I claim that this agenda includes promoting self-hatred among Whites and creating societal divisions through various means, including education and media.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If there really was a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the White race, Jews would talk about it openly and try to claim it is “inevitable.” 🧵 1/20 https://t.co/LbiBXEFPmw

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There would be a Plan written down in a book like The Kalergi Plan, which is written in the book practical Idealism. It would describe the way to break down the White race so they could be ruled over by Jews. 🧵 2/20 https://t.co/SYljWiOo3w

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The Term “melting Pot” would be made up by a Jew, to convince the masses it is a good thing to lose ethnic majorities of your own countries. 🧵 3/20 https://t.co/rJAsM06Hgf

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish intellectuals would be openly hostile to any sort of White or European identity like Max Hormheimer and Noel Ignatiev 🧵 4/20 https://t.co/msusYtpIC3

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish led corporations like Blackrock would use their financial power to force more Anti White DEI programs in companies. 🧵 5/20 https://t.co/XyInS5wzFP

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would get into important political positions and then use their power to open the borders like Alejandro Mayorkas. But also Jews like Merrick Garland would label you a White supremacist if you spoke up about your replacement. 🧵 6/20 https://t.co/WKb2hLLnQg

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Immigration disasters” would be happening all over the world in White western nations, but it would not be happening in Nonwhite nations. 🧵 7/20 https://t.co/TwoyhkLaQH

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You would Jewish intellectuals promoting open borders as a positive for the world, “Europe is not going to be the monolithic cultural countries they once were, and Jews are going to be at the center of leading this Multiculturalism.” -Barbara Lerner Spectre ✡️ 2015 🧵 8/20 https://t.co/EihGKmIsSb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Europe is experiencing a resurgence of antisemitism because it hasn't learned to be multicultural. Europe is undergoing a transformation from the monolithic societies of the last century, and Jews are at the center of this. Jews will be resented for their leading role in Europe's shift to multiculturalism. Without that leading role and transformation, Europe will not survive.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think there's a resurgence of anti Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're going to be part of the throes of that of that transformation which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker states that 20th-century Jewish movements aimed to lessen the power of Europeans in America because they felt that power represented a threat. They wanted the United States to become less Christian and less European. According to the speaker, Jewish activists believe that a homogeneous European society could easily evolve towards Nazis. A multicultural society prevents any single ethnic group from gaining too much power, thus preventing coalitions. Multiculturalist ideology was allegedly invented by Jewish intellectuals like Horace Kallen, who favored the idea of the United States being composed of separate ethnic groups. The speaker claims that this makes the United States safer for Jews by preventing a large, dominant white majority. When Jews arrived in the US, they viewed American culture negatively, finding it too white and reminiscent of Nazi Germany.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That they wanted to No. Speaker 1: They wanted to get more. They wanted to mean, wanted third world immigration. Again, my my view has been that one of the constants of Jew twentieth century Jewish immigration, of Jewish election movements has been to lessen the power of Europeans in America. Speaker 0: And why is that? Speaker 1: And because they felt that that power represented a threat to them, especially in the long run. Speaker 0: They wanted to have The United States become less Christian, less Speaker 1: Less European. Why is Because and then you can easily find Jewish activists who say that when they talk about immigration but the idea is that if you have a homogeneous European society, you can easily evolve towards Nazis, in other words, but if you have a society where each ethnic group has a sort of, you know, only a very very limited power, then that could never happen. You can never have a coalition. Speaker 0: They wanted a multicultural Speaker 1: A multicultural society which also rationalized Judaism. Speaker 0: And in fact, you said the multiculturalist ideology was in fact invented by Jewish intellectuals? Yeah. Was it Horace Kallen? What? Speaker 1: He's a philosopher. Speaker 0: Who's that person? Speaker 1: Horace Kallen, k a l l e n. He very famous. He was he was a Zionist. He was very strongly identified Jews often. He he didn't like this melting pot idea, which actually was advanced by an earlier generation of Jewish intellectuals. But Callan liked the idea that The United States would be composed of these groups, you know, of ethnic groups that Speaker 0: would sort of stay separate, like like Jews have always had. So it'll so it it makes The United States safer for people to be Jews if there's not a large dominant white majority. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Because, you know, again, when when Jews came to this country, they they saw American culture in negative terms. Speaker 0: Mhmm. And I looked too much like Nazi Germany. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's too white. They they actually did a like a survey or something back in the sixties. They talked to the Jews. You know, what they asked them would it be possible that that it could happen here and you didn't have to say what it was. It is the Holocaust. In other words, something horrible happened to Jews. So that's sort Speaker 0: of

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would have to be deeply involved in shaping immigration policy like Emmanuel Cellar who helped pass the Hart Cellar act. This act changed the US immigration policy from a European one to worldwide. 🧵 9/20 https://t.co/rDohtVntXl

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would have to use their intellectual power to control the minds of the youth through education. They would get into many Ivy League president positions, and push DEI and anti White studies. (Picture dated, I believe currently it is only 50% Jewish controlled) You’d Even kick out the black liberal Ivy League presidents if they don’t support Israel and Jews enough like Claudine Gay… 🧵 10/20

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would then start using their media power to promote race mixing and destruction of White people. Elevating mixed race stats in Hollywood etc. 🧵 11/20 https://t.co/9AxxWFGhc0

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would also use their media power to justify the White replacement. They would call it a “migrant crisis” and say it is related to “global warming.” 🧵 12/20 https://t.co/Wc0DCid5AX

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If outright open borders start becoming rejected, Jews would then need to capture the right wing and billionaire class to sell whites on white replacement as “good for them” because they are capturing the top global intelligence . Even when it is exposed as a giant fraud. 🧵 13/20

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would need to use their political power to subvert the right wing and start supporting smart “Indians” to replace them. 🧵 14/20 https://t.co/lkM1DVlX9N

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Breaking down the Whites with immigration is good, but the Jews would also need to break them down internally. They would promote feminism, degeneracy and porn. Even leading the civil rights movement would help your cause. Not because you care about building strong black communities, but so you can tear down tight knit racially defined communities. 🧵 15/20

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NAACP recruited Rosa Parks in advance to be the ideal plaintiff in a lawsuit against the bus line. They instructed her to sit in a specific place on the bus so they could sue. This was not a spontaneous act, but a planned effort to create a strong basis for a lawsuit with Rosa Parks as an attractive plaintiff. This planning makes her story even cooler.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The cool story of Rosa Parks, right, which is that the NAACP had in fact recruited her for, like, in advance, and they said she'll be an ideal plaintiff. And they had actually said, go sit on the bus in this particular place, and then we'll have a lawsuit against the against the bus line. So that I mean, that's true. I don't know what he actually said. It it is true that that was not it wasn't like she spontaneously sat down on the bus, and and then they sued. That that but that doesn't take away from her story. In fact, think it makes it a cooler story. I think it's cool that they actually were like, okay. We're gonna plan this out. We're gonna get a good good basis for a lawsuit. Rosa Parks is an attractive phase for the plaintiff. And and

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish Hedge Fund managers would help devastate White workers and create the Rust Belt by “maximizing shareholder value” then the Jewish Sackler family would kill them off with the Opioid crisis. 🧵 16/20 https://t.co/N4qNzK6vgF

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

White male suicide would be high and increasing from their lack of economic opportunities and strong communities, but you would never hear about it from the Jewish controlled media. 🧵 17/20 https://t.co/PdgmgiAkTb

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would need to teach Whites to hate themselves, saying they are even racist from Birth. If that doesn’t work, they can also warn the intelligent Whites not to procreate because of the incoming “population bomb” like Paul Erlich…. 🧵 18/20 https://t.co/Wzxi9UzSgn

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish intellectuals would need to create a theory that “Race is a social construct” like Franz Boas. Amazingly, they would also maintain that Israel needs to be a Jewish ethnostate, yet no one would speak of the hypocrisy. 🧵 20/20 https://t.co/xaO4Q8P7vq

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If Jews want to eradicate the White race from this earth, they just need to keep doing what they are doing. If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 Or subscribe on X! 🧵 20/20 I appreciate your support!

nataliegwinters
Posted - January 7, 2025 at 10:53 PM
Saved - January 8, 2025 at 3:38 PM

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

This dude thinks the real threat is @ElonMusk. Not the mass coverup of the grooming gang story. Insane. https://t.co/ymhG6t5U4E

Video Transcript AI Summary
The real risk in the US isn't multiculturalism but rather a billionaire controlling a major social media platform that promotes a narrow ideology. Growing up in multicultural Birmingham, I can assure you that Muslims who genuinely read the Quran do not endorse violence. In response, I find your personal attacks unconvincing. Young working-class girls from similar backgrounds might disagree with your views. I've read the Quran and recognize the issues surrounding child brides and sexual violence, which are not exclusive to the West. The phenomenon of grooming gangs seems primarily linked to Muslim men and has been exacerbated by mass migration.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's the Speaker 1: real risk you have in the US isn't multiculturalism. It's a multi billionaire running the biggest social media planet, one of the biggest in the world, which has turned into an echo chamber of your ridiculous ideology. And the fact that you're telling us all and telling the British public, who we're proudly multicultural, and someone that was brought up in multicultural working class Birmingham, I can tell you for sure that there's not a you won't find a Muslim there who's read the Quran and went, oh, you know what? It didn't rule out sexual violence, so I might I might just crack on with that. You you I don't know what planet you're living on or what you're smoking, but I suggest that you do a course in religious studies before you start chatting. Speaker 0: Well, thanks for the ad hominem attacks. I'm sure that means you have a really strong argument, but I think the young working class girls who probably grew up in the same areas that you did would beg to differ. I I don't understand what you're saying. I've read the Quran. I've seen what's in there. Even if you don't think that my interpretation of the Quran is correct, I would point you to, I don't know, what countries have the most issues when it comes to child brides and raping of young girls and children is obviously a systemic cultural problem, with Islam. It's not a problem that is contained or unique to the west. And I don't know. Last time I checked, the sole grooming gang phenomenon is what contained primarily to Muslim men, and it really only started when you started seeing mass migrate.
ever_e_mann
Posted - January 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Saved - January 11, 2025 at 12:30 AM

@ever_e_mann - Ever Earnest Mann

@elonmusk If you listen to what he’s saying, he’s being disingenuous. What’s he hiding? https://t.co/JXi7WJAXZF

Video Transcript AI Summary
When long-time politicians treat honesty, decency, truth, and the rule of law lightly, it negatively impacts politics. Their calls for inquiries often seem motivated by a desire to align with far-right agendas rather than genuine concern.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And when politicians, and I mean politicians, who sat in government for many years, are casual about honesty, decency, truth and the rule of law, calling for inquiries because they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right, then that affects politics.
MrAndyNgo
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 8:58 PM

@MrAndyNgo - Andy Ngo

"Hunt them down" Leftists on @bluesky and other social media sites are mobilizing threats of violence against the @DOGE team staff and their families as revenge against @elonmusk and the Trump administration. https://t.co/m8ujSOv3Xa

@cremieuxrecueil - Crémieux

Here's a handful of the many Reddit posts calling for violence and harassment against the boys from DOGE who were doxxed. This is the point of activist journalist doxxing pieces: to target people for harassment. Hope they remain safe and successful. https://t.co/qiW6oPTnRb

DC_Draino
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 2:36 PM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 3:58 PM

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

🚨Bartender tells rocket scientist he isn’t smart

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ: Elon Musk is probably one of the most unintelligent billionaires I've ever met, or seen, or witnessed. You can probably glean this from watching these people on TV. They don't do their homework. This dude is not smart. The danger in the lack of intelligence that Elon has - this guy is one of the most morally vacant, but also, just, least-knowledgeable about these systems that we really know of. What that means is that they will hit a button and things can go sideways.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This individual is one of the least intelligent billionaires observed, evident from their public appearances. They clearly lack understanding and expertise, exemplified by appointing inexperienced individuals to critical positions like the treasury. The real concern lies in their moral vacuity and ignorance of essential systems. This lack of knowledge poses a significant risk, as it is likely that they will make impulsive decisions that could lead to serious consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This dude is probably one of the most unintelligent billionaires I have ever met or seen or witnessed, which, you know, you can probably even glean that from watching these people on TV. Anyways, all of that is to say is that they don't do their homework clearly, like, they're putting 19 year olds in at the treasury. This dude is not smart. And, and the danger in not in the lack of intelligence and the lack of expertise, that Elon has. I mean, this guy is one of the most morally vacant, but also just least knowledgeable about these systems that we really know of. But the point is is that what that means is that they're going to hit a button inevitably. They are going to hit a button and things can go side.
elonmusk
Posted - February 8, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Saved - February 8, 2025 at 1:01 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Awesome 😎 https://t.co/DkoZXRROuq

codyaims
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 6:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2017, I made a joke about the headphone jack and ended up with over 30,000 pre-orders. I designed a prototype and set up production in Shenzhen, but faced challenges when my Chinese supplier cheated me with subpar components. Despite my efforts to establish distribution through Amazon and Walmart, I learned the hard way about market saturation and intellectual property issues. After refunding customers out of pocket, I sold my designs and walked away with my integrity intact. This experience taught me invaluable lessons about manufacturing and resilience.

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

For those saying I have no exp w China In 2017 I made a joke online that we should bring back the headphone jack and got >30,000 pre orders Designed a prototype, got tooling in Shengzen, setup production While onboarding to Walmart, I found out the Chinese factory rekt me lol https://t.co/ek9oLJA2Wq

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

At 19 I joined the Phantom Works site for advanced composite manufacturing My small team of 4 saved Boeing >$100M on 787 in 12 mo At 23 I programmed & helped design robotic CF layup for programs like F35 & X59 @ Skunkworks Age is only a factor to those who have nothing else https://t.co/6f1uZG8KZF

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

When Apple removed the headphone jack, many of us hadn’t switched to Bluetooth yet - I wanted to listen + charge my phone at work On the left - prototype I hacked together in a weekend & a lot of YouTube On the right - 7 weeks later, working production unit https://t.co/h4OoU5nT7g

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

I didn’t know much about China at the time, early 20s small town kid Just wanted to build fast, and tracked down Apple-approved vendors building dongles & adapters We used my prototype and made a production ready version https://t.co/q8lb6SfwQz

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

Got design, mfg, packaging all ready. I needed to solve distribution. Gf at the time didn’t love kitchen being covered in boxes, so I set them up on Amazon. Huge fees but oh well I tracked down & started to talk to Walmart & other giants https://t.co/whK2yXJVEE

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

after I shipped batch #1… a portion had a “accessory not supported” …Wtf? The supplier cheated the “Apple MFI Certified” hardware I paid a ton extra for Around the same time, the buying manager at Walmart asked to chat. Fml https://t.co/uOnSlWvO4d

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

They let me know the alibaba type markets have been flooded with this exact product & design - they can’t move forward - 1) what I offered to show all the IP. My CAD, gerber files, ffs, I helped design the tooling and paid for everything to be built. Didn’t matter, REKT https://t.co/JjENofsW2m

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

Chinese factory used me to fund the ramp up, then flooded the market at 1/10th the cost I could sell for, using our design & prod They gave me knock off Apple certified chips - when I met them next, three suits asked “What’s your legal budget kid?” Lots of learning. Hahaha https://t.co/Y7YfllDi0F

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

I couldn’t stand the idea that I could’ve just sold a bunch of junk I refunded every unit from the bad batch out of pocket which put me net -25k into this adventure I said F this and sold all the designs, IP, backlog, everything. I came out ahead but with honor intact https://t.co/gMDyBQnAHM

@codyaims - Cody James 🇺🇸

Now obv this is just one experience, but a fun one, and really a great learning opportunity I don’t claim to know a ton about Chinese manufacturing, but I’m also not a layman TBH, I feel I learned about 4 years of lessons in one Summer. Highly recommend just sending it!

JohnMcCloy
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 2:07 AM

@JohnMcCloy - Johnny St.Pete

“Musk wants to rescue these Gremlins from working underground” LOL Jesse Waters is Hysterical. He just pulled an Affleck. How can these leftists think anyone will ever take them seriously acting like grown toddlers? https://t.co/J0or9yLd0j

Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you on my side? Trump wants us all to bow to him, but we want him in jail. Also, Musk wants to rescue these government gremlins from working underground.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you on? Tell me Which side are you on? Oh. Which side are you on? Trump's covenant for our unions. He wants us all to fame. He wants us to to bow to him, but we want him in jail. Musk wants to rescue these government gremlins from working underground. And what
Sassafrass_84
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 8:26 PM
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:43 AM

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

You have to seriously be fucked in the head to go after Elon's child. What tf and I mean, what tf is wrong with liberals? Where is the line? Why can't you argue or debate on policy rather than personal attacks? To go after a child... you are fucked in the head.

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

“Fvck you, fvck your Bible, and fvck Elon Musk and that weird little human shield he carries around with him. That thing has never heard the word no. Let's face it, that little booger flickin fvcker, sitting there with the president of the United States in the Oval Office holding a press conference.” Unhinged Democrat launches a personal attack not only against Elon Musk and his 4-year-old son, but also against Melania and Barron Trump, as well as Christians. If anyone has information who this Karen is please DM.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm disgusted with the current state of affairs. Seeing that entitled little brat, who clearly has never been told 'no' in his life, holding a press conference in the Oval Office just rubbed our faces in it. There's no denying what's happening anymore, that little bastard is in charge. And to you bible-thumping folks, if you actually believe the Book of Revelations, then you must realize that we are living in the end times. The Antichrist is here, but the problem is, there are too many candidates to choose from. Is it Elon Musk? Is it Donald Trump? Or is it that strange Barron? I was happy and carefree, and now I'm stuck trying to figure out who the Antichrist is, thanks to you bible-thumping rat bastards. Fuck you and your bible!
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fuck you. Fuck your bible, and fuck Elon Musk and that weird little human shield he carries around with him. That thing has never heard the word no. Let's face it. That little booger flicking fucker sitting there with the president of The United States in the Oval Office in the Oval Office holding a press conference. Boy, didn't he just put it right in our faces what's what yesterday. So any any idea that you had that what wasn't happening isn't happening is off the table. That motherfucker's in charge. He's holding press conferences from the Oval Office with his rotten little bastard child who has never ever once heard the word fucking no. So let's just call that spade what it is. And look, you bible beaten bastard motherfuckers, come to grips with this. I went through Catholic schools. I read the bible. I read the book of revelations. If you believe in all that shit, you bible thumping rat bastards, you must believe that we are in the end of times. And you need to know the Antichrist is here. The only problem is there's too many fucking fuckers to pick. Who the fuck is it? There's so many we could be picking from. Is it that rat bastard Elon Musk? Is it the rat bastard Donald Trump? Is it the rat bastard Barron? Who's who the fuck is what's up with that thing? Because you look at that Melania Trump, Melania motherfuck, whatever the fuck her crazy ass name is. I fucking hate Christmas. I hate with the red shit all over the fucking white what the fuck was that anyway? We put this shit back in the White House. I'm beside myself. You know, I was floating around a couple of months in a fucking pool, looking at the clouds. Oh, look, an octopus chasing a Volkswagen. I was fucking happy. I was fucking motherfucking happy. Now I've gotta walk around wondering who the fucking Antichrist is. You rap bastard bible thumping fuckers. You put us here. You motherfuckers put us here. Fuck you. Fuck your bible.
hdwmovies
Posted - March 11, 2025 at 12:39 PM
Saved - March 12, 2025 at 7:35 AM

@hdwmovies - Harry

How Grok is moving right now https://t.co/0qi0oeyH2q

@grok - Grok

@f30james @NebsGoodTakes Yes, it's real. Elon Musk admitted in a 2024 deposition to using the @ermnmusk account to roleplay as his toddler son, X AE A-XII. The account posted odd stuff like wishing to go to nightclubs and celebrating "turning 3" on the kid's birthday. Weird, but confirmed.

elonmusk
Posted - March 17, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 3:24 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

My companies make great products that people love and I’ve never physically hurt anyone. So why the hate and violence against me? Because I am a deadly threat to the woke mind parasite and the humans it controls.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

The left cannot name one thing they hate Elon Musk for. They cannot name one thing the has taken away from them. Or one thing he has done to earn their insane ire. History will study this deranged cult like behavior.

DefiyantlyFree
Posted - March 18, 2025 at 2:25 AM
Saved - March 18, 2025 at 7:15 AM

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

When Barack Obama says it the left fawns. When Elon Musk says it the left burns Teslas. https://t.co/cR0mC8AhnX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a campaign to cut government waste, stating that deficit reduction requires difficult choices, including cuts to valued programs. They claim there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense. Examples cited include transgender animal surgeries and the presence of twenty million dead people in the Social Security database.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone knows that getting rid of the deficit will require some tough decisions, and that includes cutting back on billions of dollars in programs that a lot of people care about. But what should be easy is getting rid of the pointless waste and stupid spending that doesn't benefit anybody. We're calling it the campaign to cut waste. Speaker 1: You know, there's been a tremendous amount of of waste and fraud in the in the government during the Biden administration, which estimated the the federal government fraud to be half a trillion dollars. What we're trying to do is get that number down to a much smaller figure, save money for the American taxpayer, stop money being spent on things that are that I think very few taxpayers would agree makes sense, You know, transgender animal surgeries or why are the twenty million people who are definitely dead mocked as alive in the Social Security database?
VrilNews
Posted - May 30, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Saved - June 4, 2025 at 7:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there’s a concerted effort to mislead the public regarding COVID-19 and its vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer and Moderna, which I view as dangerous. The focus on these vaccines distracts from the real issues, such as the origins of COVID-19, which I argue were funded by taxpayers. I also see troubling trends in political discourse and censorship on social media, particularly regarding immigration and ethnicity. I feel that recent executive orders blur the lines between religion and ethnicity, disenfranchising Christians, particularly white Europeans.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Commie jews are def trying to rugpull America’s middle-class for their lack of support for Israel with a bioweapon-AI one-two punch. The US tax payer funds genetic research that’s shared across all types of organizations & as is the case with COVID19/EcoHealth, used offensively.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The Trump admin’s push for AI & disbanding of the Health and Human Services Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Long COVID speaks volumes (https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/27/long-covid-hhs-secretary-advisory-committee-disbanded-trump-rfk-jr/).

The Trump years will be grim for long Covid sufferers The disbanding of an HHS advisory committee may signal the end of federal involvement in addressing long Covid. statnews.com

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The concept of a “red herring” is that a piece of information is published to intentionally mislead or distract from a more consequential underlying information…

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The red herring, today, are COVID-19 vaccines (seemingly, mainly by Pfizer & Moderna), which make no mistake, are dangerous. Which is why they were pulled for children.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Even though these vaccines are deadly, the administration’s sole focus on them distracts from far more important and underlying information. What’s that, you might ask? Effects of COVID-19 itself, which was grafted together in a lab at expense of the US taxpayer.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

(That’s why the HHS is concerned about Skittles instead of long COVID, for example)

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Furthermore, alarming incidences of inversion and doublespeak are occurring where inverted versions of political reality are boosted on X’s “MAGA” accounts (https://thepostmillennial.com/trump-admin-approves-over-120000-h-1b-visas-for-2026-as-tech-industry-lays-off-thousands-of-us-workers).

Trump admin approves over 120,000 H-1B visas for 2026 as tech industry lays off thousands of US workers There have been 120,141 H1-B visas granted to foreign workers for 2026. thepostmillennial.com

@MAGAVoice - MAGA Voice

BREAKING 🚨 JD Vance FULLY supports President Trump taking away many Foreign Student Visas 🔥 WE DO NOT NEED FOREIGNERS TAKING A SEAT FROM AMERICANS AT THESE UNIVERSITIES PERIOD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker rejects the idea that American citizens lack the talent to excel and believes that reducing foreign student visas presents an opportunity for Americans. American higher education, particularly in biology, faces a reproducibility crisis, with many published papers being irreproducible and not representing sound science. Furthermore, these institutions are allegedly engaging in explicit racial discrimination against whites and Asians, violating the Civil Rights Act. The speaker suggests government intervention to ensure accountability, prevent civil rights violations, and ensure that federally funded science is of high quality. The speaker clarifies that this is accountability, not a war on institutions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This idea that American citizens don't have the talent to do great things, that you have to import a foreign class of servants and and and, professors to do these things, I just reject that. I actually think we invest in our own people. We can do a lot of good. You've heard that criticism in particular as the president has talked about cracking down on foreign student visas and their abuses, but I think that's actually an opportunity for American citizens to really flourish. Here's the second and maybe the most fundamental point, Greg. These institutions do an important job. But if you back up and look at American higher education over the past twenty or thirty years, there are a few incontrovertible facts. Number one, particularly biology, we have a terrible what's called a reproducibility crisis, meaning most of the papers that are published in biology, they don't replicate. They're not good science. So even our elite universities are not often doing good science. Second important point, these institutions, sometimes by their own admission, are engaging in explicit racial discrimination, often against whites and Asians in explicit violation of the Civil Rights Act. If the people's government can't come in given those problems and say, look, we could have some accountability here. You can't violate the civil rights act. We gotta make sure that if we're funding science with federal money, you're actually doing good science. That's called accountability. That's not going to war on these institute

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

In a most egregious and obviously anti-white move by Musk’s X, a user was suspended for receiving more likes on their post than Musk did on his pro-immigration post:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

After Musk’s X noticed this reply’s popularity greatly surpassed its own, the user was suspended. Despite nearly two-thousand X users quoting the suspended user’s post with great praise, it was censored:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

In a clearly Kabbalah-inspired set of executive orders, like the Rotary Club explains in its own foundational description, the Trump administration purposely conflated religion with ethnicity in the following Executive Orders:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

The Rotary Club conflates ethnicity with religion to enable secrecy & crypto-Judaism: “The four founding members were descendants of different nationalities (American, German, Swedish and Irish), as also their religions were different (protestant, catholic and jewish).”[2]

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

1.) E.O. 14202 - Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias (Feb 6, 2025 https://archive.is/dmj5V) 2.) E.O. 14188 - Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism (Jan 29, 2025, https://archive.is/uVj0Z)

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

By “conflating” religion (Christianity) with ethnicity (semitism, Jewishness), it purposely and executively disenfranchises Christians, the majority of which are white Europeans.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

Additionally, Christian (specifically Catholic) scripture specifically states they are the “chosen people” as declared in the Holy Mass of His Holiness Leo XIV with the College of Cardinals, 09.05.2025:

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

“… 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝘄𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼𝗺 𝗚𝗼𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻, so that we may declare the wonderful deeds of him who called us out of darkness into his marvellous light (cf. 1 Pet 2:9).” (https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2025/05/09/250509d.html)

Holy Mass of His Holiness Leo XIV with the College of Cardinals press.vatican.va

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

This fact is further supported in the historically accurate biblical studies of Bertrand L. Comparet, a native Californian, born in San Diego. He was graduated from Stanford University with the degree of Bachelor of Arts and Juris Doctor.

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

https://t.co/BZbCcGpWmo

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

In 1976, Bertrand writes in “Your Heritage”: “The word "Semitic" is derived from the patriarch Shem, & is correctly applied to people descended from him. All true Israelites […] are therefore Semites; & today these are the great White Christian nations of the Western World.” https://t.co/aWiMkZagSw

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

https://t.co/bKesjCBvVV

@VrilNews - Real Vʀɪʟ News ⥥ 🇻🇦

I would truly love to see @Pontifex make a statement about this. Let it be known—awareness on this particular issue will absolutely positively be raised, regardless of censorship on social media platforms so obviously infiltrated by nefarious influence and intelligence actors.

VigilantFox
Posted - June 4, 2025 at 10:24 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk is a polarizing figure, seen as either a villain or a hero, but Kevin O’Leary argues he transcends politics. During a discussion with Piers Morgan, O’Leary defended Musk's impact on government efficiency and accountability, emphasizing that even a brief tenure sparked important conversations. He praised Musk as a unique visionary, contrasting him with other leaders, and criticized Scott Galloway's personal attacks on Musk. O’Leary urged a focus on progress rather than petty outrage, advocating for innovation and real solutions.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk is either saving the world—or destroying it. Depends on who you ask. The Left calls him a dangerous villain. The Right hails him as a visionary hero. But Kevin O’Leary says both sides are wrong because Musk transcends politics. You could hear a pin drop the moment Scott Galloway finished tearing into Musk. That’s when O’Leary silenced him with a brutal diagnosis—and Galloway’s face said it all. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Kevin O’Leary didn’t show up to Piers Morgan Uncensored to play politics. He showed up to tell the truth. While critics mocked Elon Musk for coming up short during his brief stint at the Department of Government Efficiency, O’Leary reminded them why Musk was there in the first place. “Is there a waste in government spending? That was the whole DOGE idea. Yes there is.” No, Musk didn’t find $2 trillion in savings. But as O’Leary pointed out, the clock barely started ticking. “Elon never found 2 trillion, but he only worked on it for 130 days.” And yet, that was all it took to shift the national conversation. “But the theme is now embedded in everybody’s head, red and blue, that there must be a perpetual audit of government and the brand is called DOGE, and that’s okay.” That idea—of holding Washington accountable—isn’t going away. And for O’Leary, that’s the real victory.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts there is waste in government spending, which was the idea behind "doge." Elon Musk did not find $2 trillion, but he only worked on it for 130 days. The idea that there must be a perpetual audit of government is now embedded in everyone's head, regardless of political affiliation. The brand for this idea is "Doge."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there a waste in government spending? That was the whole doge idea. Yes. There is. Elon never found 2,000,000,000,000, but he only worked on it for a hundred and thirty days. But the theme is now embedded in everybody's head, red and blue, that there must be a perpetual audit of government, and the brand is called Doge, and that's okay.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then came the part O’Leary clearly cared about most: the man behind the disruption. To him, Elon Musk isn’t just another tech billionaire. He’s in a category of one. “He is the most remarkable individual.” O’Leary, who worked for Steve Jobs, has seen visionary leadership up close. But even Jobs, he said, was 80% signal, 20% noise. Musk? “Elon is the only individual that I’ve ever met that’s 100% signal.” “He does not even deal with noise.” O’Leary described Musk’s mindset with clarity and awe. He doesn’t entertain distractions. He doesn’t fake politeness. If a conversation isn’t valuable, he walks away without hesitation. “I’ve watched him walk away—and I’ve used this example countless times—he’ll walk away from a conversation the second he thinks it’s a waste of his time.” Is he socially awkward? Sure. But O’Leary was unapologetic in his defense. “He’s very awkward socially, but look at what that man has achieved! And he’s only 50% through being the modern day Da Vinci.” And Musk’s track record speaks for itself. Starlink changed the game in Ukraine. Tesla forced the entire auto industry to evolve. SpaceX might be humanity’s only shot at becoming multi-planetary. “There’s nobody on Earth that’s achieved as much as he has.” O’Leary wasn’t just defending Musk. He was defending excellence and warning that tearing it down in the name of personality politics is a national mistake.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker compares Elon Musk to Steve Jobs, stating Jobs was "80% signal and 20% noise," focusing on essential tasks and minimizing distractions. The speaker argues Musk is "a 100% signal," avoiding noise entirely by disengaging from conversations he deems unproductive. The speaker acknowledges Musk's social awkwardness but emphasizes his achievements, calling him the "modern day da Vinci" and claiming no one has accomplished as much. The speaker dismisses criticism from figures like Bono, preferring Musk's contributions to solving global issues. The speaker highlights the importance of Starlink in Ukraine, the value of Tesla, and the potential of SpaceX to enable travel to Mars, attributing these advancements to Musk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is the most remarkable individual. I used to say this about Steve Jobs, who I worked for, that he was 80% signal and 20% noise. In other words, in any given day, as Jobs used to tell me, I'm gonna get the five things I have to get done, and I will not let noise get in the way in this eighteen hour cycle, and you should follow me and do the same. And that worked for him. Look at what he achieved. They don't look at Elon Musk, and I'd argue to anybody listening. Elon is the only individual that I've ever met that's a % signal. He does not even deal with noise. I've watched watched him walk away, and I've used this example countless of times, countless times because I've seen it. He'll walk away from a conversation the second he thinks it's a waste of his time. He's not garnering any information that's useful. And that's he's very awkward socially. But look at what that man has achieved, and he's only 50% through being the modern day da Vinci, if you wanna call him that. There's nobody on Earth that's achieved as much as he has. And, of course, that's gonna draw criticism, whether it comes from a rock star that wants to be a politician. I love YouTube music, but I don't listen to at all to Bono's politics. I don't think he spends a lot of time worrying about it until he's talking on air. I'd rather he write music that I can enjoy. I'd rather listen to what Musk has to say in terms of moving forward on these mandates that solve huge problems for mankind. Where will the Ukrainian soldiers be without Starlink? Yeah. Where would people be without Teslas that provide incredible value for the dollar and the low cost versions? Or or what about SpaceX? Will we get to Mars? Well, if we are, it's gonna be because of Elon Musk.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/R6RPF4TUfz

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then Scott Galloway chimed in. What followed wasn’t a counterpoint. It was a TOTAL meltdown. “I think the two of you are more impressed with Mr. Musk than I am,” Galloway began, before unleashing a tirade that sounded more like a gossip column than serious debate. “I think if somebody is making Nazi salutes…” “If somebody is being sued concurrently by two women for sole custody of their child…” “When someone is so severely addicted to drugs, they can’t get their shit together to show up to the White House without looking exceptionally high…” “I don’t think that’s the right role model for young men.” Galloway's monologue dragged on, cherry-picking every personal smear ever published about Musk—much of it unproven, none of it relevant to his actual accomplishments. He even compared Musk to Bill Gates, claiming Gates plants trees while Musk will leave a legacy of “death, disease and disability.” “I think this is an individual who has literally come off the tracks.” By the end, it was less an argument and more a performance—a moral panic disguised as a lecture.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses disapproval of Elon Musk, citing concerns about his behavior and influence. They claim Musk makes Nazi salutes, is being sued for sole child custody due to lack of involvement, and appears high at the White House due to severe drug addiction. The speaker contrasts Musk with Bill Gates, alleging Musk isn't using his wealth to help people. They believe Musk is off the rails, rabidly addicted to drugs, and using his power to influence elections. The speaker predicts Musk's legacy will be unnecessary death, disease, and disability for the world's most vulnerable, not innovation. They state that his behavior is not what it means to be an innovator, an American, or a man.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think the two of you are more impressed with mister Musk than I am. I think if somebody is making Nazi salutes, if somebody is being sued concurrently by two women for sole custody of their child because that person has not spent any time with that child, when someone is so severely addicted to drugs they can't get their shit together to show up to the White House without looking exceptionally high, I don't think that's the right role model for young men. So what I would ask of all of us is look at what money has done to us, That if someone can land a rocket on metal scissors or create a great AV, he's a genius. He's the wealthiest man in the world. But does that mean we should excuse depravity? Does that mean unlike Bill Gates, he's not using his billions to help people? He's not planting trees the shade of which he won't sit under? I think this is an individual who has literally come off the tracks, who is rabidly addicted to drugs, and is using his immense power to get people elected, and that too many of us excuse what is abhorrent behavior. I think his legacy is not gonna be an EV or putting rockets into space. I think it's gonna be unnecessary death, disease, and disability of the world's most vulnerable. That is not what it means to be an innovator. It's not what it means to be an American. It's not what it means to be a man.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Galloway went quiet as Kevin O’Leary summed up his rant with just three words: “Musk Derangement Syndrome.” O’Leary didn’t raise his voice. He didn’t need to. “What you just heard there from Scott is Musk Derangement Syndrome.” Calm and precise. Surgical even. While Galloway spun wild theories about addiction and doom, O’Leary brought the focus back to what actually matters. “I think it’s fair that he has those criticisms, but it doesn’t distract or take away from the achievements the man has made so far and will make.” Then he made his case for staying grounded in reality—not drama. “I’m an advocate for executional excellence. Because in the end, if you burn your calories trying to change someone who you know is not going to change and don’t focus on the output that he can provide… then you are in the form of being dominated and controlled by a derangement syndrome.” O’Leary wasn’t there to defend Musk’s quirks. He was there to defend progress—and to reject the new cultural obsession with burning down anyone who builds. “I think that’s a waste of time, criticizing, you know, that he’s not a man,” O’Leary said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses "Trump derangement syndrome," acknowledging criticisms but emphasizing Trump's achievements and potential contributions, particularly in robotics. The speaker advocates for "executional excellence" and focusing on positive output rather than trying to change someone. They avoid getting drawn into "Trump derangement," viewing it as a waste of time. The speaker works in Washington on a bipartisan basis, representing entrepreneurship and job creation, finding common ground even with figures like AOC and Elizabeth Warren. The speaker respects differing opinions but believes in prioritizing progress and "moving the needle forward."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what you just heard there from Scott is must arrangement syndrome, and and I get it. And I think it's fair that he has those criticisms, but it doesn't distract or take away from the achievements the man has made so far and will make. And I'm an advocate for executional excellence, because in the end, if if you burn your calories trying to change someone who you know is not going to change, and don't focus on the output that he can provide, and the great solutions for mankind he has provided and hopefully will with robotics you talked about, then you are in the form of being dominated and controlled by a derangement syndrome. That's my opinion. And I've so far avoided that by and I and I work a lot in Washington now, and, you know, I'm I'm very, very fortunate to be able to work on a bipartisan basis because I represent entrepreneurship and job creation for small business, and that's bipartisan. Even AOC and Elizabeth Warren want to support that, and and I can have my narratives with them. But when we get into Trump derangement, I shut off, and I it's it's not a waste of time. And and I think that's a waste of time criticizing, you know, that he's not a man. I mean, I I just find that and I respect Scott. I mean, I respect his opinion. I respect all opinions, but let's burn our calories moving the needle forward is my view.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As O’Leary tore into him, Galloway sat there quietly with this expression: the face you make when you realize Musk lives rent-free in your head. https://t.co/IL3Fuie7oM

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

O’Leary ended on this point: “Let’s burn our calories moving the needle forward,”—meaning enough with the petty outrage and focus on solving real problems. It’s time to channel that energy into real progress, real innovation—something Elon Musk is doing while others just talk. https://t.co/k6JxZzpbv1

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading to the end. While the media protects the powerful, citizen journalists are exposing what they won’t. Don’t miss this thread—30 truth-tellers they don’t want you to follow: https://t.co/E5nMuu2mcs

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

George Orwell once said, “Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations.” While the media protects the ruling class, ordinary people are doing real journalism on 𝕏. Here are 30 truth-tellers they don’t want you to follow. 🧵 THREAD

RichardEntuboca
Posted - June 9, 2025 at 3:08 AM
Saved - June 9, 2025 at 11:35 AM

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

SPOILERS: Y’all know Greta Thunberg works(ed) for Straubel Foundation… aka, Tesla, right? Straubel Foundation also goes by the monikers “Redwood Materials”, “Breakthrough Energy” and “Stanford Engineering lab” from time to time. (She’s fine.) https://t.co/ukEgzaHZMN

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

I’m sorry this is happening to you and your Straubel Foundation operative is backfiring. Be less terrible for a change.

@NiohBerg - 𝗡𝗶𝗼𝗵 𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗴 ♛ ✡︎

Oh ok the Jews are behind climate change now

ryangerritsen
Posted - March 17, 2026 at 1:42 PM
Saved - March 17, 2026 at 4:52 PM

@ryangerritsen - Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

Téa Johansson a high school student understands “climate” more than the rest of the eco insane within our Government. Do you think Carney will look up to her like he did Greta? Of course not. This is a must watch & share. https://t.co/ueebh2dV1x

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that life on Earth is in crisis due to crop failure, social and ecological collapse, and mass extinction, framing these as part of Extinction Rebellion’s climate alarmist narrative and a broader political and financial “climate industrial complex” that aims to control purchases, diet, and travel in the name of sustainability and net-zero emissions. They contend that people rely on governments and the media rather than data, and promise to show that temperatures fluctuate, are not unprecedented, and that natural disasters are not getting worse. They claim climate data is unreliable and that CO2 plays a small role in climate, while presenting scientific evidence that we are not in a climate crisis. Using a 65-million-year temperature graph, the speaker states the Earth today is in a cool period and is coming out of an ice age, noting that life thrived in much warmer times without human CO2 emissions. They assert that over the last two thousand years there have been two warm periods and two cold periods, including the Roman warm period, the cold Dark Ages, the medieval warm period, and the Little Ice Age, with current warming described as a recovery from the Little Ice Age. The three degrees Fahrenheit of warming cited by scientists and the media is described as not unprecedented and not cause for alarm due to ongoing fluctuations. The speaker argues that warming and CO2 emissions have not made natural disasters more frequent or violent, citing hurricane and wildfire data. They reference a graph from the Bulletin of the American Urological Society showing a slight downward trend in US hurricanes per year since 1900, and a North Atlantic hurricane intensity graph from 1920 to 2016 showing no trend. They claim the 2014 US National Climate Assessment presents an illusory upward trend by focusing on a red-highlighted portion. They also claim that US and global acres burned by wildfires have been decreasing since 1900. Regarding data reliability, the speaker highlights a gap between climate model predictions and observed data, noting that temperature measurements from weather balloons align with satellite data, while climate models over-predict warming. They discuss the urban heat island effect, giving Paris as an example where city temperatures are much higher than surrounding rural areas, suggesting data can be biased to frighten the public. The speaker argues CO2 is not the climate control knob, as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere, and that historical CO2 levels have been far higher than today. They cite MIT oceanographer Carl Wunsch (spelled as Karl Wench) to claim that when oceans warm, more CO2 is released, and when oceans are cold, CO2 is absorbed. A graph is described showing CO2 rising centuries after temperature increases, implying temperature drives CO2 more than the reverse. They acknowledge CO2 may have some small influence but emphasize many other factors—volcanic activity, cosmic rays, and the sun—and claim limiting CO2 would largely stunt biodiversity with little effect on temperature. The speaker argues CO2 is essential for photosynthesis and that farmers use high CO2 in greenhouses to boost crop yields, illustrating CO2 as a life-giving gas and stating it would green the planet and increase food supply if CO2 increases. They conclude that climate change is an existential threat in Western discourse but offer this as historical context from Aztecs to the Salem witch trials. They mention carbon taxes and individual CO2 budgets as signs of climate issues infiltrating daily life and frame their conclusion as pursuing truth by examining data themselves. In summary, the speaker presents historical temperature variability, critiques of data and models, downplays CO2’s role, highlights CO2’s benefits to plant growth, and asserts that the climate crisis is a hoax to be opposed by scrutinizing data personally.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Life on earth is in crisis. Crop failure, social and ecological collapse, mass extinction, we have a moral duty to take action. These statements made by Extinction Rebellion reflect the climate alarmist narrative that has continued to escalate across the Western world. Hysteria over climate change can be seen throughout history, from the human sacrifices of the Aztecs to bring back rain, to the Salem witch trials to eliminate the women who they blamed for crop failure during the Little Ice Age. Today, the climate industrial complex is funded by trillions of dollars seeking to control what we buy, eat, and where we are allowed to travel all within the name of sustainability and achieving net zero carbon emissions. This fear campaign is rooted in the belief that we will not look into the data ourselves, but instead look to the governments and to the media to tell us what is true. Today, I will demonstrate that temperatures fluctuate and are not unprecedented and that natural disasters are not getting worse. I will also highlight the unreliability of climate data and the role of c o two. Ultimately, I'll present scientific evidence to show that we are not in a climate crisis. Historical temperature records indicate that we are not in the climate crisis western governments claim we are. Looking at a graph of the past sixty five million years from Noah, the earth today seems to be in a particularly cool period. In fact, the Earth is still coming out of an ice age. History demonstrates that life has existed and thrived in much warmer temperatures and that temperatures have been much higher without the human influence of industrial c o two emissions. Historical temperature records indicate that the temperature of the earth naturally fluctuates over time as it has for the past sixty five million years. In just the past two thousand years, there have been two warm periods and two cold periods. The Roman warm period, also called the Roman optimum, was known as a time of prosperity. This of course goes against the entire narrative that warming threatens human life. Following the Roman warm period came the cold dark age, the medieval warm period, and the Little Ice Age. The current warming from 1800 onwards is the warming of recovery from the Little Ice Age. However, temperatures are still cold compared to distant times and continue to visibly fluctuate. Given this evidence, the three degrees Fahrenheit that scientists and news pundits claim is the end of civilization is not cause for alarm because it is not unprecedented and because temperatures will continue to fluctuate. Today, the argument for climate change is rooted in the belief that warmer weather and CO two emissions have been causing natural disasters to become more frequent and more violent. However, after studying hurricane and wildfire data, it became clear that actual activity goes against this global warming narrative. This graph from the Bulletin of the American Urological Society shows the number of hurricanes in The US per year since 1900, showing a slight downward trend for the past a hundred and twenty years. The strength and duration of hurricanes shows a similar lack of crises. A graph from the National Hurricane Research Laboratory illustrates the North Atlantic hurricane intensity from 1920 to 2016, where there is evidently no trend. However, the data presented to the public by the 2014 National Climate Assessment of The United States is limited to the portion highlighted in red creating illusory upward trends. This graph starting in 1920 shows that the number of acres burned by wildfires in The US has been decreasing. Similarly, the number of acres burned globally since 1900 has steadily declined as well. Ultimately, this the presented evidence goes again goes against the narrative that anthropogenic c o two emissions has been making the weather worse. To understand the science behind the climate crisis claims of today, it is necessary to highlight the unreliability of available data. This is most evident in the disparity between climate model predictions and the observed data. In this graph illustrating temperature change, the blue line represents data taken from weather balloons matching up well with the green line which represents data taken from satellites. However, the red line represents the climate model used by the UNIPCC to predict future global warming. These observations show that actual warming is about one third of what is predicted. Temperature measurements are greatly affected by what is called the urban heat island effect. Since concrete picks up heat, temperatures taken in cities are much higher than those taken in rural areas. For example, in a thermal radiation map of the city of Paris, the middle of the city produces a deep red color representing heat, while the rural areas around the city project a green to blue color representing milder temperatures. This gap represents one way that climate alarmists can instill fear by embellishing data to serve their agenda. Perhaps the greatest tool of the climate industrial complex is the supposed evil of c o two. However, c o two is not the control map for climate change mainly because it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere. I'll say it again, c o two is only 0.04% of the atmosphere. In a visual comparison of c o two to the other atmospheric gases, it shows how barely negligible the gas is in comparison. Although the mainstream media has tried to alarm its consumers with the accelerating emissions of c o two, the earth is actually in a c o two famine. Current levels are about 423 parts per million. However, in the past they have been at least a thousand parts per million and have likely reached 8,000 parts per million. While the narrative states that c o two directly causes the rise in temperature, it has been found that quite the opposite is true. The relationship between CO2 and temperature is not that more CO2 causes a rise in temperature, but that a rise in temperature causes an increase in CO2. Karl Wench, professor of oceanography at MIT, found that when the ocean warms, more c o two is released into the atmosphere. On the other hand, when the ocean is cold, c o two is absorbed into the water. In a graphical correlation between temperature and CO2, it is found that when a rise in temperature occurs, a rise in CO2 follows a few centuries later. In this graph, CO2 rose eight hundred years later in response to a surge in temperature. While c o two, like everything else in the world, may have some small factor in climate, there are countless of other factors affecting temperature. Some examples are volcanic activity, cosmic rays, and the sun. This highlights how if we were to limit c o two, it would only stunt biodiversity while having almost no effect on temperature because of the fact that it is only one small factor in a sea of greater causes. Some call CO2 the gas of life because it plays an instrumental role in the process of photosynthesis. It comes as no surprise that most farmers use high levels of it in their greenhouses to produce a better crop. In this picture, four pine trees are shown growing at different levels of added c o two. From normal atmospheric c o two to an added one fifty, 300 and eventually 450 parts per million, more CO2 is evidently beneficial per for plant growth. This is as Lubos Motel, former professor at Harvard, summarized the importance of CO2 and saying, it is the key compounds that plants need to grow and indirectly that every organism needs to have food at the end. It is clear that c o two is not as the New York Times frighteningly put, a tiny bit of arsenic or cobra venom, nor will it cause famine as many claim. If c o two increases, it will only green the planet and increase the food supply. Across the Western world, climate change has been coined as an existential threat to mankind. While this sentiment is not new over the course of history as it can be seen as it can be seen through the Aztecs and even in the Salem witch trials, it has once again become relevant in today's culture With policies such as carbon taxes and individual c o two budgets being proposed in our governments, we begin to see the climate issue creep into every part of our lives. This is why I I found it necessary to pursue the truth in the climate debate. In my speech, I presented the scientific evidence behind historical temperature change and natural disasters, discovering the unreliability of climate data and the small role of CO2 in climate and its essential role in biodiversity. As a result, I've concluded that the climate crisis is a hoax that we must arm ourselves against by pursuing the truth and by looking into the data ourselves.
View Full Interactive Feed