reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 4, 2023 at 6:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unveiling the Intricate Web of Election Integrity: Patrick Byrne's Revelations Introduction: In the realm of election integrity, one name has emerged as a key figure, Patrick Byrne. Renowned for his relentless pursuit of exposing Wall Street corruption, Byrne's investigative journey spans 15 years, with his alarm bells ringing louder since the 2020 election. Today, we delve into the fascinating life story of this entrepreneur, his battles with cancer, and his involvement in significant events that have shaped our political landscape. Unveiling Byrne's Life Story: From humble beginnings to entrepreneurial success, Patrick Byrne's life has been a testament to resilience and determination. Overcoming multiple battles with cancer while pursuing his studies and degrees, Byrne's tenacity has been unwavering. However, it is his involvement in pivotal political events that truly captures our attention. Byrne's Role in the Russia Collusion Hoax: One significant chapter in Byrne's story is his role in the Russia collusion hoax. He firmly believes that this fabricated narrative would have been employed against any Republican candidate. Through his experiences, Byrne sheds light on the intricate workings of political manipulation and the potential consequences it holds for our democratic processes. Involvement in FBI Dealings and Facilitating a Bribe: Another intriguing aspect of Byrne's journey is his involvement in FBI dealings and his facilitation of a bribe for Hillary Clinton. These revelations highlight the complexities and questionable practices that can occur within the corridors of power. Understanding these events is crucial in comprehending the broader context of Byrne's pursuit of election integrity. Unveiling the Iwo Jima Event and Biden's Bribes: Byrne's relentless pursuit of truth led him to expose the Iwo Jima event, where he shed light on Biden's alleged bribes and the government's awareness of foreign interference in elections. Despite facing attempts to silence him, Byrne persisted in his mission to uncover the truth. These revelations provide valuable insights into the potential vulnerabilities within our electoral system. Trump's Strategy and the Betrayal: Aware of the interference, former President Donald Trump was presented with options to protect the country. The plan involved senators investigating the election, but their betrayal ultimately led to the certification of Biden's victory. However, the full details of the events that unfolded on January 6th are yet to be revealed. Trump's strategy aimed to avoid triggering a civil war while simultaneously exposing the infiltration of the deep state. Staying Informed and Engaged: As the war for election integrity continues, it is crucial for us to remain informed, calm, and engaged in our responsibilities as citizens. Loy Brunson, in a recent interview, emphasized the importance of showing support to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) amidst claims of foreign interference. Over 80,000 letters have already been sent, with hopes of reaching 80 million. The pursuit of justice has exposed instances of crooked judges and government agencies going rogue, underscoring the significance of Byrne's revelations. Spreading the Word and Making History: In a media landscape that often shies away from such controversial topics, it is imperative to make Byrne's article go viral. Whether it is through downloading it for free from DeepCapture or purchasing a hard copy on Amazon, spreading the word is essential. By doing so, we can collectively make history and contribute to the ongoing pursuit of election integrity. Conclusion: Patrick Byrne's journey is a complex tapestry of experiences that intertwine with the pursuit of election integrity. From his early battles with cancer to his involvement in significant political events, Byrne's revelations shed light on potential vulnerabilities within our democratic processes. As we navigate these challenging times, staying informed, engaged, and supportive of institutions like SCOTUS becomes paramount. Together, we can make a difference and overcome the obstacles that lie ahead.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

@PatrickByrne has provided a “clean link” to the article I mentioned the other day. “Domestic Extremist #1” https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/4217811/dhs-domestic-extremist-1-patrick-byrne-comes-clear I want to do a thread on this to make shareable tidbits because this is a long. I hope I do him Justice. It is very informative & I highly recommend reading the whole thing. Please, share this with everyone. Especially off Twitter. This story is THE biggest story of our time. And I’m counting on you guys to help me get it out there. Especially outside of our bubble. This story is why I have a snippet of Byrne in my bio pointing to “14 minutes that will change your life”. THIS will unite the country- or at least it should. Because this isn’t about Trump. This isn’t about R vs D. This is should be a concern of every American. As always, please be patient with me while I peace all of this together for you.

DHS Domestic Extremist #1 Patrick Byrne Comes Clean My most revealing post ever. Now you know... the rest of the story. Please spread widely, as in our Information War, this is a hypersonic missile. Only chance you have to strike with it is now. patrickbyrne.locals.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I’m going to cover the article first. But I want to take you on another journey about Byrne, that many may not know. There are many pieces to curate. So this won’t be a “fast” thread. I will let you know when I get to “the end for now”. Byrne is an ever evolving story. Every interview he goes he drops little nuggets. Rarely are they all in one spot. And it depends on what audience he is communicating with. So I am confident there is “more to the story” that will emerge.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne “began” his journey to “notoriety” with his exposing Wall Street days. There was some dirty dealings going on with short sales. You can listen to an explanation here. The journey is rather more complicated & nuanced than this little video. And that story dove tails into his election integrity story. https://youtu.be/BdBe5_8z53A Much like his election integrity journey, he was poo-poo’d away for YEARS. Not until 2008 & Allen Greenspan testified in front of congress was Patrick Vindicated And much like the Wall Street story, he will be vindicated again & history will remember him kindly, to put it mildly.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne has rightfully been named the “kingpin” of the election integrity movement. He has been sounding the alarm since right after Nov 3, 2020 election. If you go to Patrick’s Locals channel and sort by “oldest” you will see he went on an alternative media blitz to get the word out since he was persona en grata with MSM You can start here https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/618978/11-17-2020-patrick-byrne-interview-2020-election-was-rigged-and-changed-using-5-us-counties-newsm Many would be surprised that he has been investigating for 15 years

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a well-versed American patriot, has been aware of the sketchiness of the election systems for about 15 or 16 years. They have been working with a group of people who have uncovered some significant findings. In 2018, the Dallas election had irregularities, which prompted the Texas governor to form a panel to investigate. This panel hired a cybersecurity group to study the irregularities, specifically on Dominion Machines. Over the past two years, this group has reverse-engineered the process of stealing an election using this equipment. The speaker has been associated with them since August and has been actively supporting their efforts for the past 4 or 5 months.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I'm so glad to have you on my show. You're a very well versed American patriot, and you have been for quite a while. I saw you pop up a couple years on you. We talked about when you talked about bowling machines a couple of years ago? Speaker 1: Well, I actually have. I've been in on this for about 15 or 16 years, how sketchy our election, systems are far sketchier than most Americans understand. But so I you could've heard me a couple years ago saying something about it. Yeah. But now you said Yeah. Go ahead, please. Speaker 0: You you went completely down the rabbit hole. Right? You kept digging and digging and digging. Now you've come up with some gold at the end of the tunnel. Am I right? Speaker 1: I dig and dig, I came out the far side. Yeah. Yes, we have well, I'm blessed to be working with some people who are Who really have the picks and the axes and the shovels, and they have come up with some real gold. In fact, What's happened is in 2018, not to jump ahead too much. In 2018, the Dallas election had irregularities in it. And the Texas governor formed a blue ribbon panel to study these irregularities, which are the kinds of Regularities we're seeing now, it was done on Dominion Machines, and they hired us that governor's panel hired a cybersecurity group to study it and figure out what the heck happened. And so that group has had 2 years to reverse engineer how you steal an election Using this equipment while the rest of America's had a couple weeks at best to try to follow it. This group has had 2 years. I've been associated with them since August, them and another group and a various collection of white hat hackers and and just kind of, You know, and been supporting it. So I I've been on this very specifically for about 4 or 5 months now.
11/17/2020 Patrick Byrne Interview: 2020 Election Was Rigged And Changed Using 5 US Counties - ... Dr. Patrick Michael Byrne, the founder and former CEO of Overstock, said he has evidence that the presidential election was stolen from President Trump. Read related article on DeepCapture.com: https://www.deepcapture.com/2020/11/newsmaxtv-breaks-cone-of-silence-millions-hear-story-there-first/ Quoted from article: patrickbyrne.locals.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Patrick “invited” everyone to come to the capital on the 4th, 5th & 6th. We now know the event was hijacked by organizers led by a political operative who “took over” the event & the Feds. There were a lot of “operations” going that day that ended with the loudest narrative against those Americans who understood 2020 was stolen. In large part from Bryne’s efforts to inform the public. True to his nature, he offers to pay for all damage & face the charges given to peaceful protestors. https://twitter.com/patrickbyrne/status/1661845151549931520?s=46&t=O8LXe-b2zwQWLx95iqRDnA…

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The next few pages are a fascinating tale of his life. Byrne is the poster-child for “you were born for such a time as this”. His unique life & life experiences put him in the position of a great education, mentors that people would pay big money to get lessons from & life experiences that gave him a unique set of skills. I encourage you to read up on his life going from a humble beginnings to a very rich man based solely on hard work & good business decisions. His journey to Overstock included going to China & Thailand to study. His family took a gamble with an unknown investor at that time, Warren Buffet, & it paid off big time. But if you have listened to enough of his interviews, as I have, you can tell he has remained humble & kind. I have to admit, I like his Irish temper when he gets fired up. I wouldn’t want to be at the end of any fisticuffs with him. In another interview, he talked about bicycling across the country, twice. His adventures with friends. One of which, a basketball star, was murdered by his own brother. I hate to cut his life experience to a short description, but I could do a whole thread on just that. I’ll leave that to the historians, bibliographers, & screenwriters. I did found it interesting in this article that through his education & the people he was surrounded by, he knew something wasn’t quite right in the leftist circles. And sought to understand it. In this interview he gives more insight into who he is. He knew by age 10 he wanted to think about bigger issues. How many 10 year old do you know that are deep thinkers? https://youtu.be/kALNSFPe5lQ This interview also gives you insight to his forward thinking. He was “drop shipping” before Amazon, using fair trade before fair trade was a thing, developed bitcoin, and blockchain (see screenshot of comments…bigger than the steam engine). Our elections would be secure on blockchain, IMO, that’s where we are headed.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

An inspiring aspect of Byrne is his battle with his health. He has had over 100 surgeries. I believe this last one he just had this year was #114 or 115! It is unique in itself that he has battled cancer multiple times & won, but as you will soon see, he was fighting for our country through it all. I believe that higher purpose gave him the fight & God obviously blessed him to continue. And through his hospital years, he studied. Worked towards his degrees. He did not wallow away watching tv. This is what men used to be made of before soyboys became more prolific ☹️

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I call Patrick the ultimate “people watcher”. He studies, he watches, he puts pieces together. That skill lends well to his entrepreneurial leadership but also his skills in “helping Uncle Sam”. This article goes into his entrepreneurial endeavors after his education & cancer. But in no reality, he started in high school. When you listen to the interview I posted above, you will hear him talk about a Christmas tree business. He’s no slacker.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

This is where we enter the “helping save America” life mission. The article states in 2005 he started with the Wall Street battle. But, I seem to remember an interview where he stated it was about 2 or 3 years prior in investigations & people coming to him with information. I’d like to pint out two things: 1) Byrne took it very seriously that “old people” were getting ripped off by Wall Street short sale crooks. He says old people but I believe it was “the little guy” in general. And 2) in 2006 a DOJ guy, Breem-got the info, quit & called Byrne to tell him he had 30-40 people behind him. This is also the same year of the infamous letter from the Judiciary Committee that I listed Byrne to root out the cancer in our government. I’m attaching this interview with Tore because, not only do they discuss the letter, that she previously didn’t know about, but she adds some more details/background on things you should know. https://patrickbyrne.locals.com/upost/619397/12-07-2020-patrick-byrne-interview-sting-op-deep-state-take-down-2020-election-fraud-tore-says

12/07/2020 Patrick Byrne Interview: Sting Op Deep State Take Down 2020 Election Fraud - Tore Says December 7, 2020: Tore Says Interview with Patrick Byrne, founder of Overstock - Sting Op Deep State Take Down. In this rare interview, former Overstock CEO shares he was commissioned by the bi-partisan 2006 Senate Intel Committee to take down the Deep State. He has an integral role in the sting operation to trap all those involved in Election Official Fraud. READ The Story of Deep Capture here ➡️ https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/deepcapture-the-story-v1.pdf patrickbyrne.locals.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Speaking of forward thinking…did you know Patrick was one of the original ESA advocates? He has long advised for educational vouchers to allow parents to choose their child’s education. It also speaks volumes about his character that Friedman want Patrick to carry on his name & his legacy after he died. Wikipedia is poop, but this gives a pretty good summary of the Friedman’s accomplishments https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman

Milton Friedman - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Enter “Russiagate” In 2019, Byrne went public with what he knew & what he was asked to do that helped perpetuate the Trump-Russia collusion lie. THE LIE that has severely divided our country. If we are to save our country, this needs to be understood by all. Not only the Lie itself, but the lengths certain people have gone to for YEARS to keep it alive (eg Shifty Schiff & the lying media!) Please take note of this Warren Buffet nugget. I know many have questioned Warren Buffet. I think this passage shows what side Buffet is on. He didn’t get super angry because he was left out of the coup. 😉

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Patrick has stated, the Russia collusion hoax would have been used on ANY Republican that rose to the top. It was “Can-O-Russia-Scandal” taken out & shaken up to spray all over Republicans. But, it was Trump, the grassroots populist candidate that made it work so well. A man people loved to hate. Trump is also the reason it didn’t work well on the grassroots. He was the perfect man to create polar opposite reactions. Take note of the paragraph that the agents tell Byrne to forget about the whole Hillary $18M bribery with the threat of death. Which, Byrne didn’t take to kindly to. In the interview I posted above, he tells of the death threats he got during his Wall Street days. His battle with his health made him unafraid of death, as he states in the article, he’s met death at least 500 times. Since the YouTube interview regarding WallStreet, he since acquired the ultimate insurance policy. The mother load of blackmail information collected by the bad guys who killed Seth Rich, perpetrated the Russia Hoax & covered for Hillary’s emails.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been investigating them and subpoenaing people who know them, including their lawyer. They claim to possess a large amount of information, referred to as the "mother lode," which they have stored on servers overseas as an insurance policy. They mention the death of Seth Rich, alleging that Rod Rosenstein ordered MS-13 members to mug and kill him. The speaker also discusses a joint FBI and OGA operation against Russian hacking groups, which was initially based in Frankfurt and later moved to Baltimore under Rod Rosenstein's supervision. They claim to have obtained thousands of documents and audio recordings related to these matters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's another one, and it's come to me in the last 24 hours. And I'm gonna be open about this because my life might be involved. The DOJ in the last 3 weeks has come sniffing around. They're subpoenaing people who know me. They're subpoenaing my lawyer for grand jury testimony. It's been my lawyer. I think justice Payne is your lawyer for grand jury testimony. Had a real beef with you. And only that, it's the southern district of New York, which is a bunch of Obama guys. So Speaker 1: Makes. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's a bunch of Obama guys. They're gonna come after me, so I'm gonna make something clear. I have the mother lode, and I'm not gonna describe to your view your viewers what the mother lode is, but I have the mother lode, terabytes and terabytes of information that would keep an army of blackmailers in in what happened was, well, anyway and I'm not going to use it. I'm not threatening to use it. I'm not going to use it, but if I start it's already overseas uploaded into different servers under dead men's switches, I'm gonna and it's gonna stay there. That's my insurance policy because if these guys come after me unjustly and, and I'm not threatening them, but they know they know the story between us. And if they come after me for the things that I did, they put me in some Crazy positions, uncle Sam did. And I followed my heart and patriotism as best I could. If they're mad at me, They wanna go to war then but let me tell you one of the things that's in there. I wanna tell you something that's come out today just to give you a taste. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: And this is I would own I'm only making this public because it's already broken today. You know about the death of Seth Rich. Right? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Do you know who that was? Since Rich was killed by on Rod Rosenstein as well. Rod Rosenstein had 2 DEA agents, who themselves went to 2 MS 13 people and gave them an assignment to catch, Seth Rich, who was carrying a thumb Seth Rich always carried a certain thumb drive on him with a bunch of very important things, and there was no one to always be on him. And so 2 MS 13 guys were sent to mug him on the orders of Rod Rosenstein and 2 guys from the DEA, and they mugged him and but it went badly and ended up killing him. Those 2 MS 13 guys were gunned down on 2 days later in a parking lot in South Carolina. Now I'm always saying this because there's already somebody leaked this this morning, but I have all the document. And so the documentations for that for that got out and I saw somebody else has already put it up on a site redacted, Assupably impacted, so I'm just endorsing. That actually happened. Well, that is one drop in a swimming pool of Wow. Terabytes and terabytes of thousands and thousands and thousands of documents and audio recordings that have been brought to me. And the same thing happened that happened when I fought Wall Street 15 years ago is that people came out of the woods and started telling me things. And one of the things I've done over the last 3 months while I've been working this issue is I've obtained all of that. And what it is, I'll even tell you more. What it is, I'm gonna be completely honest, there was a operator in Frankfurt consulate. Our consulate in Frankfurt had an operation that was operating against the Russian hacking group, Cozy Bear and and, Fuzzy Bear, And it got moved to Baltimore, and it was the it was called Baltimore Station over in the Frankfurt consulate. It was a joint FBI and OGA operation. And the people involved over there in Frankfurt Alright. Quite an interesting list and I'll get back to that. It got moved back to Baltimore where it was in Baltimore Station, Operating under US attorney at the time, Rod Rosenstein, and the people involved in this project includes Include, first, 2 federal agents Speaker 1: who are now in prison. Speaker 0: Trump doesn't get any information. He is surrounded by People who are Trump knows nothing of what I'm saying. I mean, he he could have been explained to him. He's just got people who are buffering and keeping everything away from him, so you can't pass what he knows. But let me tell you, this Baltimore station, Rod Rosenstein was over it. There was an agent called Bianca who worked there. The name ring a bell? Pianca? Speaker 1: Yeah. Pianca. Bill Pianca. Agent no. Joe Pianca. He was on the, Flynn case that in his three zero two went missing. Speaker 0: And it was he and Peter Strach And Peter Strach. And and then set up that day when he was first in the in Then as a national security adviser and Comey has bragged, oh, we figured they weren't very well organized. We sent some people over to in that was Peter Strzok and Joe Pianka. Joe Pianka previously left was working in his Baltimore station station, 2 feds who later went to prison for stealing Bitcoin from the government and another fed who another guy who went on and opened a company called CrowdStrike, Sean Henry. CrowdStrike Mhmm. Is basically a cyber security group for the DNC. So a bunch of people whose names surfaced 7 or 8 years later in this other mischief were actually all together in this group. And what this group had in Baltimore was complete access to all the secrets of the US government. They were tied in to a a node or some I don't understand enough of the NSA and how it all works, but they had this special node where they could download and access all the secrets, and they build up a treasure trove a treasure trove of blackmail material. I now have that entire thing. Tens, hundreds of terabytes. I have it. It includes information under I have multiple copies on foreign servers under kill switches, under dead man switches. It includes information as recent as live as a couple days ago And you can't believe when the word gets out of how this really happened, put it this way, I was told 1 guy was waterboarded with kerosene to try to make him give up this by federal agents in a in a in the within in domestic soil to make him give up this location. We have the entire thing. It's now perfectly safe. It has been uploaded into different foreign servers and under my dead man switch. So, now all that Said, I sure hope I can return someday to my formally, reasonably, cordial relationship with uncle Sam.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

A summary in a nutshell for your friends that don’t like to read or don’t have time👇🏻 https://rumble.com/v1sa2h4-14-minutes-that-will-blow-your-mind.html A intriguing telling to listen in the car on the way to work, is Spy Affair on Wondery. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spy-affair/id1557382427

14 Minutes That Will Change Your Life Patrick Byrne head of The American Project at the ReAwakening American Tour in Branson MO 11/5 Patrick was given an amnesty letter 16 years ago to do whatever it took, except murder, to save America. rumble.com
‎Spy Affair on Apple Podcasts A charismatic Russian woman arrives in the US on a mission to improve relations between the two countries, and she soon makes some powerful friends. But who is Maria Butina? And who is she working for? As Maria gets closer to the rich and connected she also attracts the attention of the FBI. In the… podcasts.apple.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

In the article, Byrne points to this snippet on his rumble channel that confirms his past FBI dealings. I’d love to have @ChuckGrassley & @TGowdySC come out publicly & confirm the letter. to shut down the deepstate lies & skeptics. https://rumble.com/v2u1zek-us-attorney-acknowledges-patrick-byrne-on-bongino.html The man in this video playing the clip is a source Byrne has used early on the release info. He was the source I heard about the white hat hackers Byrne employs & works with. (More on that later). But for the life of me, I can’t remember his name to find that video. So if anyone knows, please leave in the comments.

US Attorney Acknowledges Patrick Byrne on Bongino In August 2019 retired United States Attorny Brett Tolman went on Fox News and confirmed some basics of Patrick Byrne's story. rumble.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne had a history of helping Uncle Sam reach peaceful outcomes. So his handlers having him continue involvement with Maria in July 2015 when he report interaction with her at a Trump speech wouldn’t have been out of the ordinary. He states he had 60% hopeful that this could be good for USA/Russia relations, 30% concern what Maria was up to sniffing around Rs & 10% reserved that there may be an opportunity to further flush out the cancer (remember his ultimate mission bestowed upon him from the judiciary committee) The Feds had warned Hillary away from Maria, but allowed her to “court” several Rs. What confirmed Byrne’s suspicions is they told Byrne to allow a meeting between Don Jr & Maria to “play out”. So by Nov 2015, he knew what the Feds were up to with her….a set up for the Rs.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

He romances her, on behest of the Feds. They are so cute…they used Luminosity daily scores to “flirt”. So there ya go ladies…Byrne appreciates a brilliant kind. He states he really did appreciate Maria’s intellect.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

By Thanksgiving of 2015, the Feds now tell him they want him to facilitate a bribe for Hillary. That in the investigations they were doing, they had to show a propensity to that behavior. So he was to arrange a meeting with “the bag man”. Which he successfully did. 10 minutes in a hotel room of Hillary’s assistant that doesn’t show up on her schedule. https://youtu.be/lR60-2MaJxc

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

February 2016 enters CIA Brennan go between. Byrne’s informed of a 2008 law change that allowed the CIA to take over FBI functions for Russian related incidents. The 3rd goon warns Byrne to forget the whole Hillary bribe thing on threat of death. As I’ve stated before, this Irishman didn’t take to kindly to that. And waited for his opportunity for “pay back” for being used to set up Maria/Rs & being threatened. Fast forward, & they ask him to rekindle the relationship with Maria, after he abruptly ended it last time, which he does. And uses this opportunity to get Brennan & Obama to sign off on the rape & murder of Maria. (That tidbit is the the video “14 minutes to change your life”) Ultimately, we know what happens to her - she had the SWAT team descend on her home she gets locked in a windowless box for 18 months being fed slip through a slot. He does express regret at using Maria. Byrne’s guilt got to him so he gave her $1B in bitcoin. I hear she’s in Parliament in Russia now.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The reason I think Byrne called this article an “Iwo Jima” event is for two reasons: 1) He’s all in. He just laid out everything in one spot. He stated in the article, he planned to take this all to his grave. And he’s telling what he knows, just enough to get the point across. And as he stated in the previous video above - he has a butt load of dirt on all these people. 2) He added context/addition info he hadn’t said before. For instance… more Biden bribes 👇🏻 It’s imperative that people understand what this means against all Americans. And it’s our job to get it out. In 2019, Byrne tried to get the info out. But they laughed at him & brushed it under the rug. https://youtu.be/BMn2reDJsuY There were 2 journalists in particular who were told the WHOLE story & they were too week to publish it. https://rumble.com/v1s8dxe-who-had-the-facts-russia-collusion-story-is-a-lie.html

Who Had The FACTS Russia Collusion Story IS A LIE Patrick Byrne Head of the American Project at the ReAwaken America Tour in Branson MO 11/5 He caught the Deepstate & exposes all of them. Look for the full video on my channel. These 2 journalists wer rumble.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

3) Byrne lays out the time line that it was KNOWN by our government that foreign interference happened in our elections. Put a pin in this. I’ll be back later with more…

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

You likely haven’t been following Byrne & watching all his interviews. I must confess…I “knew” he knew things. I had stumbled upon his Wall Street fight during that time. I thought it interesting because I had lost a chunk of change in day trading & sought to understand the “system” better. I knew as soon as my money hit the system “they saw it”. I had careful analyzed & put in my short position. 1 tick, they took me out & changed direction. I knew right then the system was rigged. So when Byrne popped on scene again I took note. I want to take a journey to piece together some things for you that you may have missed or forgotten about.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Remember the screenshot of the article above that outlined the timeline that our government knew about foreign interference? They KNEW 2020 was going to be stolen. How? because white hat guys stopped the steal in 2016 to give us more time. The deepstate plan was for Obama to be president for 24 years! His first 8, Hillary’s 8 (controlled by Operation Snow Globe) & Michelle’s 8. Had Hillary won, we would be a totalitarian socialist country right now, we’ll on our way to the pint of no return.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, there was controversy surrounding the hacking and recount of voting machines in Michigan and Wisconsin. Hillary Clinton was upset because the machines she had hacked got unhacked, and Jill Stein demanded a recount. It was believed that Hillary expected the same treatment as Joe Biden in the election. She had been promised that the game would be rigged for her, but it didn't happen. This caused her to lose her mind and throw things. In 2016, someone counterhacked the people who were going to hack on Hillary's behalf, but that didn't happen this time. The speakers know who did it but will save that for another discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, if we could go back to 2016, remember when Hillary got all upset because the machines that she had hacked got unhacked, and then Jill Stein came in and demanded a recount because they couldn't figure out how those machines in Michigan and Wisconsin and such got unhacked or dehacked and Trump had won there? Remember that? Speaker 1: I do remember that quite well. And very good of you to know about that. I, I have not met anyone. I've mentioned that to a couple people. I've never met anyone who knew about that beforehand. That's just Speaker 0: what happened. About it since 2012 when I ran for president and saw what it takes to get on the ballot. Speaker 1: Well, it is the case that in 2016, I believe Hillary was expecting what was done for Joe Biden to be done for her. And so in that famous scene we've all read about where she's at her tower in New York, and she's been expecting to, be be have won that night, she lost her mind and was throwing plates and bottles and stuff at people? That wasn't just because she had lost And she had hoped all her life to be president, but she had lost. That was because she had been promised that the game would be rigged for her, And and it hadn't been. They had failed, and she was screaming basically because she was saying, you know, you guys promised you promised that you would take care of this, and it didn't happen. That's why she was so out of her mind because this was supposed to happen in 2016 When but somebody else got in the way. I'm not ready to reveal to the public how it happened, but in 2016, somebody counterhacked The people who were gonna hack on behalf of of, Hillary, that did not happen this time. But that's what really happened in 2016. But we'll Hang on. Stop there. Speaker 0: I knew that. I I figured that out right quick, and I think I figured out who did it too. And I wondered if, you know but that yeah. We'll save that for another. I I have good insight. Speaker 1: I know who did it, But we'll, we'll save that for another night. Speaker 0: Yeah. We'll save that for, we'll have a cocktail, and we'll make a

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

As soon as Trump got in office he established an election integrity commission. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-order-establishment-presidential-advisory-commission-election-integrity/

Presidential Executive Order on the Establishment of Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity – The White HouseOpen MenuWhiteHouse.govCopy URL to your clipboardOpen SearchShare on FacebookShare on TwitterCopy URL to your clipboardWhiteHouse.govTwitterFacebookInstagramYouTube trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

In 2018 Byrne says there was a government group who reverse engineered the code. It’s not hard to do. It’s like math: A + B = C White hat’s capture the data. They have the Rolls & CVR, etc. They can figure out how the final product was produced. Take note of what Byrne says at the end… “The number of people who had to look the other way is unreal”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2018, the Dallas elections had irregularities, similar to what we're hearing now. Texas hired a cybersecurity group to investigate these irregularities, finding 10 different ways the Dominion equipment could be manipulated. Texas outlawed the use of Dominion, but it was still used. This group spent 2 years reverse engineering how to rig an election using Dominion. Meanwhile, another cybersecurity group, including hackers and other experts, mapped out the election manipulation plan. They approached DHS and CISA for a meeting, but they refused to attend. It's concerning how many people turned a blind eye to this issue. Lawyers involved may not understand the technology, but they should be held accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And your viewers should understand this, is that in 2018, the Dallas, Texas elections had irregularities in them Mhmm. Much like the irregularities we're now hearing about. This Texas state government hired a cybersecurity group to investigate these odd facts about the Dallas election that had been managed on Dominion equipment. That cybersecurity group went in and discovered about 10 different ways Mhmm. You know, the systems could be cheated. Mhmm. Ten different ways in which Dominion stuff is garbage. And in fact, Texas outlawed it in Texas as a result of that. Although I understand it was used anyway, but, Texas outlawed it, or made made a right against it. So that group was on it for 2 years and has had 2 years to to reverse engineer the the the way to rig an election using Dominion. Mhmm. The rest of America's had 2 weeks, 3 weeks to understand senate, they've had they had 2 years. I've been I've started get and they and another cybersecurity group. I started getting involved with N Funding back in the middle of the summer and kept this going and hired other hackers and hired other people that were needed. And we had the whole thing mapped out, just what they were gonna do, so much so that that's why we went to the DHS and the CISA and c ends they refused they they a a meeting was scheduled and a and a special room reserved for it, and the seasoned people whose job is to oversee this refused to attend the meeting. How odd. How criminal? How criminal? Well, all these people there's got all these yeah. Yeah. And, you know, it's not just if if you have a Microsoft lawyer over this kind of stuff, you get what you deserved because lawyers know you know, they don't know any of the actual technology. But, they're top sheeters. They're top leaders, they don't really understand it, but it's beyond below them, there's it's just filled with all kinds of of the number of people who had to look the other way for for this stuff to happen is unreal.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

This part of the interview Byrne let’s us know there is RICO. Likely by now, you have figured this out.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

There are certain things Twitter is not letting me post. 🤔 Highly likely “hidden” code to suppress info is still in effect. Data packets were confirmed to be captured the night of 2020 election. You’ll have to do some digging but you can find the affidavit from Col Waldron with pictures of China IP addresses.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

They have been reverse engineering & putting pieces together since at least 2018. “they” (various teams across in various capacities) have been investigating Since “activating” American citizens in 2020, the biggest crowd sourcing investigation has been going on to sus out who-what-where-when. There will be people who will wish they took offers to be whistleblowers. Byrne’s “plan” he is talking about was the FBI/CIA plan that they had him convinced & duped into participating with. He realized they were conducting a coup & stepped in to try & clean up the mess….thus, the article & all the revelations within.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The evidence of foreign infiltration has been known

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Microsoft certified security expert provided evidence of a Dominion vote counting machine in a swing state with a wireless card connected to a thermostat's wireless network. The IP address traced back to a city in China, linked to a Chinese corporation involved in questionable dealings with American politicians. There is a thick binder of documented evidence showing foreign access and interference in the election, including public statements from the FBI and DHS warning about Iran's involvement. The evidence is undeniable, and those questioning it should argue with the FBI and DHS. The photographs and IPs provide conclusive proof of foreign interference in the voting systems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 3 weeks ahead of what's in there. Here's one key thing. I'm not gonna tell you the state or much details about this, but I can tell you a Microsoft certified security guy has given us the photographs and the hard documentary or evidence of a Dominion vote counting machine, tabulation machine, in a swing state that had a has a I mean, we have the photographs, everything, has a wireless card inside it, and the forensics show that it connected to a a, a wireless in network in the thermostat. In the thermostat of the room, there there was a wireless network that connected into this machine, and when we trace back the IP, guess and then where it was, where from which it was accessed on election night and during the vote tabulation, over the next 24 hours, that was accessed through a, through a thermostat wireless into the wireless card on the the vote counting machine, and the IPs reveal, when you track them back and strip away the noise, was somebody in a city in China. And the city in fact, the actual address of that IP is connected to a is the the address of a corporation in China whose name has already come up in relation to some dirty dealings with some politicians of that state in America. So now and this is by no means we already have had I should be bringing this in the next room. I got a binder this thick of oh, I'm sorry. I'm Sydney. Anyway, I was gonna have this binder brought in. I've got a binder this thick of hard document documentary evidence foreign access and involvement on the this equipment. As a matter of fact, people are forgetting this. On November 3rd and on October 30th, the FBI, and I think it was CISA, DHS, put out a statement saying that Iran is illegally inter is has interjected itself into our election equipment. They were saying that 3 days before the election and on the day of the election, they put out special warning that Iran was electronically coming in and interfering our election. Everyone seems to forget that. You know, the proof what's proof one aspect of the proof is the FBI itself published this on November 3rd that it was happening that day or else one of them published it. So there is no question, but we have we have so many examples of this. Here's the binder we oh, thank you so much. Here's a binder we have. Well, this is, here's the Iranian advanced persistent threat. You should have your people your viewers Google this. Iranian advanced persistent threat actor identified. This is coming from, the Seiza group in the DHS, and it is dated October 30th. And there's more from the FBI on November 3rd itself. If I maybe screwing up a day or two, maybe the FBI was a couple days before. But the point is this whole binder is filled with both public documentation as well as private affidavits that document this up the wazoo, foreign this entire binder's only concerns foreign involvement in our computers, in our vote in our voting systems on during this election, this entire binder, and some of them are affidavits and some of them are government statements that were coming out on the day of the election that this is in fact happening. So there is no question when the mainstream media says, where's the evidence? You know, tell them to go argue with the FBI. Tell me to argue with the seat size of it because they're the ones who were saying it. But I'm telling you, we have this example I just gave you. I'm not telling you the state or any more details. We have the hard soup to nut documented photographs and IPs and everything. There was access from a Chinese company in, well, I won't tell you the city in China, from a company whose name is already, at the periphery of some of this mischief that they were accessing through the through the Internet, through a hidden port and a thermostat in the room getting on the Dominion machine and a that was you being used for vote counting in the middle of the vote counting in a swing state. So there's no question at this point. Anyone who's you know, it's silly. That that set of pictures and IPs itself documents everything we need to document.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

So many patriots showed up to the White House on January 6th, because they knew the 2020 election had been stolen by a foreign government or that at least knew in their gut something wasn’t right. Byrne describes it perfectly…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the credibility of Joe Biden's popularity by highlighting anecdotal evidence. They mention that Biden's campaign rally in Arizona had a low turnout, with only nine attendees, six of whom were his own campaign staff. They also point out that Biden's Thanksgiving address, which was treated as a formal event by the press, only had around 1,000 viewers on YouTube. The speaker finds it ironic that Biden, who supposedly received 74 million votes, struggles to attract a larger audience. They suggest that these inconsistencies raise doubts about the narrative that animosity towards Trump drove millions to vote for Biden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think that on Biden, you know, these are just anecdotes. I don't mean they're all these to be proof of my assertions, my allegations, but I I'm just trying to make people see the ridiculousness of some of this. Joe Joe, you know, Trump got a traffic jam 96 miles long supporting him in Arizona. Biden did his 1st campaign rally in Arizona, and I don't think 9 people showed up and 6 of them were his own campaign people. And just the other day on Thanksgiving, Biden did you know, clearly, they're trying to socially engineer and reinforce this reality that he won. And the just the other day at Thanksgiving, he did the presidential the president-elect, thanksgiving address as if it was some formal thing that had a history and the press, of course, place into it. But in that address, if you look watch it on YouTube, there were a 1,000 people watching live streaming. So somehow, the guy who beat Trump with 74,000,000 votes, the guy who beat him cannot draw 9 10 people to a rally in Arizona and can't get more than a 1000 people on live stream. I think my cute kitten can get a 1000 people watching them or her on livestream. So, that just tells you that that's the glitch in the matrix that can tell the alert public these things aren't adding up. There's a lot of other much more solid piece of evidence. But anecdotally, isn't it funny? I mean, if we're really to believe that, basically, the party line from the left is that the animosity towards Trump is so extreme that that's what drove 80,000,000 to go and vote for Biden. That's why people are so impassioned about Biden to get rid of Trump. Well, if that's true, why can't the guy draw more than a 1000 people on live stream on the as president-elect?

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

So, by now, everyone is wondering, with all this evidence that Byrne either has or knows about…did Trump know? Byrne confirms he told Trump in the infamous White House meeting with Flynn & Sydney Powell. And Byrne laid out the options given to Trump under the executive order. Read the account of the White House meeting carefully. Trump knew. Trump knew his options given to him by the executive order. So what did Trump do?….. next tweet I don’t want this tweet to get shared as a stand alone

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions that they have informed someone about the idea of implementing the National Guard for a hand recount to meet the deadline. They state that the person has heard about it before and is being reminded again through an intermediary. The speaker believes that if the action is delayed until January 6th, it will have negative consequences. They mention that the idea has been presented to the person again, but not by them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think he's heard this? Has he do you think he's taking this into consideration to implement the National Guard on a hand recount for the you know, to get results in by Friday next week? Speaker 1: He heard it all from me, December 19th, and he heard it again tonight from an intermediary. He's hearing it now from somebody, from an intermediary. And, Let's so, so he I know he's been the idea has been revisited upon him tonight. But as I predicted to him, if you wait until January 6th to do this, it's gonna look really ugly. Just do it. So anyway, It's thrown out there, and I know I can't say he's considering, but it has been presented to him again tonight, not by me.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Read this account of the White House meeting. Byrne has confirmed Trump was made aware of the foreign interference. He was also given options. From totally seizing everything to the very lightest of touches. At this point Trump not only had the right but the DUTY to protect this country. The only question remains is…WHAT did Trump do?

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Take note of this snippet. Byrne is a master. He keeps his mouth shut. If you have ever watched him & noticed him self editing. People wrongfully think he has an impediment or stuttering problem. However, if you’ve watched the previous clips, he has zero problem when he is not searching his brain to determine if it’s information that either A) has become public yet or B) it is not time to reveal. In this clip, which is from 2020, you can see how he redirects Ann’s attention to another topic by dropping more info she hasn’t heard. Take note of the method he knows they use to steal the election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses foreign interference in elections and questions why the president is not pursuing this avenue. They mention evidence of votes being sent overseas and foreign actors meddling in elections. The speaker then explains how voter rolls are kept in foreign nations, such as Pakistan, and how fake ballots are attributed to registered voters who have not yet voted. They reveal that 171,000 blank fake ballots were dropped into the system and attributed to different people, ultimately benefiting the Democratic candidates. The speaker concludes by stating that there are other aspects of foreign involvement in elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I can I inter interrupt you here, Patrick, really quickly? Because, you know, one of the things that has been the harbinger for how and why we lost is all of the foreign interference in elections. Sydney Paul has talked about it. Your team has proven that the votes have gone overseas. We've had a lot of, you know, foreign actors coming in from China, Cuba, Venezuela, Italy now. I mean, we're we're learning that all of these other people have been middle meddling in our elections. Like. Why are we not when the president has all of this evidence, why are we not pursuing that avenue? I mean, it's very cut and dry. Computers don't lie. Ones and zeros are objective evidence here. We're not talking about, well, maybe they read the ballot wrong, maybe there was a hanging chad. This is pretty damning evidence. Why is the president not leveraging that? Is it because he doesn't have anybody to hand it off to, no DOJ, no law and order, no nobody? Speaker 1: Well, let me tell you. Last night, I watched packet traffic between Georgia and Islamabad. They were changing the balance last night live between Islamabad and and there were connections to Beijing. Aging and Islamabad were on the machines and well, what really happens, just so you know, I think you asked me on your show, how come people in Nevada when they register to vote, the information is sent to Pakistan. Do you remember asking me that? Or maybe it's a different show. I've done well, let me explain. I've been holding this like Close, but I'm done holding things close. I've got Flynn. I agree with me. It's time to let things out. I mean, what the hell are we waiting for? Here's how they do it. What are we waiting for? Yeah. Here's how they do a bunch of them. There's there's different buckets. There's different buckets of how they cheat. Here's a big one and it it's they keep voter rolls, our voter rolls, copies of them over in Pakistan and other foreign nations, and at the end of the day, like Happening last night in Georgia. They get to the end of the counting or near the end of the counting with just a few percent left, and they discover That their candidates are 150,000 short or 130,000 short. They drop in 170,000 Fake ballots last night, but you can't just enter a fake ballot. It's got to be attributed to get into the system. It has to be attributed to some voter in the voter Registration. So what this system does is it goes live, and it checks in Islamabad Where is, get of a a registered voter who's not yet voted? And, okay, we'll we'll like. Check it off to him, okay, the next one will check off to the next one. And so that's why they use them up and that's why you also get these weird results of people saying, I didn't, I checked, I didn't vote, but it shows that I voted, that's why it was happening. And that's why these things have to have a live connection. They have a live connection back to Islamabad or back to were back, and that real time checking is done. So at the end of the day, what they did last night, they dropped a 171,000 like. Blank fake blank ballots into the system. They to get them through the system, they had to say, well, who were these 170,000 voters? Like. It attributed them, it went in Czech Live and Islamabad and attributed to a bunch of different people who had not voted, and then they all just get adjudicated and dropped To the 2 democratic candidates. That's how it works, folks. I'm now revealing it because what the hell is the point of keeping it secret? That's the big four now there are other aspects of foreign. So there's absolute foreign involved into this.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Think back… What did the huge Russia Hoax lie do? It was SO successful that it hamstrung Trump. He knew if he seized all the machines it would have triggered civil war. Half the country completely believed Trump was Hitler incarnate. A heavy hand would have confirmed that. The deepstate would have successfully made people believe he was lying & he was controlling the military & everyone to just say the election was stolen

Video Transcript AI Summary
DNI John Radcliffe needs to step forward to make anyone believe what it would take. Although he seems intelligent, he may not be the best fit for the job. He has been deceived by those around him. It would be helpful if he could come out and discuss this matter. A meeting with him and a few others could potentially convince him or show evidence of foreign involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What it would take no one's gonna believe him at this point. What it would take is DNI John Radcliffe coming forward. Now, John, if you think Donald Trump has been up to his chest and snakes, DNI Radcliffe has who I've met a couple times, three times, and he seems like a very fine and smart man. He seems like a very intelligent guy. He's Not sure he's the guy I'd send to go bite the ass off a bear and that's what that job really took. And he's a careful federal prosecutor type guy and he's been totally buffled and snowed in by the people around him. So it would really take he should come out. I could sit with him in for 90 minutes tomorrow and bring a couple people, and if if he's not convinced to foreign or we can we can show all this.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

S what has been the “plan” that Trump chose? We haven’t seen everything unfold yet. But…we know part of that plan was to get senators to do the right thing & send the electors back down to the state to investigate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patrick discusses the discovery of fraudulent ballots in Georgia. After sending someone to investigate a voting operation in Fulton County, they found that one of the three piles of ballots was illegitimate. The Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee inspected the ballots but they were later loaded onto a rental van and disappeared. The next day, a shredding operation in a neighboring county shredded some of the ballots, but law enforcement intervened and found shredded ballots and a receipt from a Chinese company. Patrick believes this is a national security issue and calls for action. He expresses confidence that Americans will not accept a rigged election and emphasizes the importance of maintaining peace while standing against it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, Patrick, I I followed you on Twitter. I saw that you post something, in Georgia, and, the the ballots were being shredded. And then there's, like, a receipt found from Chinese print shop. Tell us a bit more. Speaker 1: That's correct. We located some, Operation in Georgia in Fulton County, Georgia, Atlanta, where we thought there were some we sent somebody into the voting operation And the warehouse took samples of from 3 different piles, big, big piles. We had those tested forensically by two Federally certified forensic examiners, they have confirmed, as they said on Sesame Street, one of these things is not like the other. One of those ballots is not legitimate. The other 2 were. On last Wednesday, the sent the Georgia Senate Judiciary Committee When he voted to go inspect those ballots in those warehouse, we got movies. 4 hours later, an enterprise rental man backed up to the warehouse, Loaded it all up and disappeared. We know that the next day, a shredding operation in the next neighboring county called Cobb County Was somebody brought them a bunch of ballots to shred, which you shouldn't be doing, and they shredded them, But the law enforcement got involved. We had everything under and law enforcement got involved, And it all ended up dumped out on the floor of a police station, and they have found £3,000 of Shredded ballots, but here's the great part. The machine, you do something like that and by the way, they're shredding. They didn't just do the strip shredding. They didn't do the confetti. They did the special military shredding, which creates little tiny spitballs. So they really wanted to get rid of it, but some things Ducked to the side of the van, some complete ballots, and a receipt from a Chinese company that shipped The ballots to the United States. So they were counterfeiting ballots in China again to be used in Georgia and I believe other other States as well. Speaker 0: You know, we're not surprised by it because I remember attorney Cindy Powell said earlier that, there were ballots printed in China, and they were still being shipped to United States either across the Mexican border or on plan. So what do we do about it? What's next? Speaker 1: Well, we found them. We found them. It's true. 1st step is we gotta get through this phony election. 2nd step, which could be over tomorrow If they if the people in the senate read the constitution and understand their duty, at no point do you have a duty? This is a national security issue. At no point does Does any senator have a duty to to sell the country out to China? So that's the first step. And the next step is we have to We we have to talk to China. I do not wanna go to war with China. I wanna be a peacemaker, but this was an act of war. This was an act of war, and we have to revisit The whole relationship were designed if there's gonna be 1 at all. Speaker 0: Do you have high expectation of what's going to happen tomorrow. Speaker 1: I have high expectations in one sense for yeah. You know, I can't tell you what Michael Pence is gonna do, But I can tell you what we're gonna do. There's, you know, we there's this phrase American exceptionalism, and there's a question of whether what that means. Well, I think we're finding out because this kind of coup has worked in Venezuela. It's worked all over Latin America. It's worked in Greece. It's worked in lots of countries. It's not gonna work here because Americans are not going to bend a knee to a rigged election. I see why other Nations have fallen for it. They've created this kooky, insane world where you can't even find your way out of it. But at no, And I understand why other nations at the end of the day gave up, but Americans will never accept a rigged election. If we do, It's the most fundamental concept of our tradition is consent of the governed as determined by elections That are free, fair, and transparent. If we give ground on that principle, it's all gone. So under no circumstance Can we bend the knee to this? Now I wanna be clear. I'm not advocating violence. We're the good guys. We're gonna do everything peaceably. It's the goons who bring violence. We're we wanna maintain that moral high ground so we we don't engage in violence, but we're not gonna bend a knee.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne has said that senators were informed prior to J6. Read this article. It’s a hit piece, but in 5G information warfare, there is truth & lies mixed together. Note that Col Waldron put together a power point that was distributed to the senators. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/12/11/2068815/-Retired-Army-Colonel-and-informational-warfare-specialist-lets-slip-that-he-sent-the-Powerpoint They were informed, they knew. If you remember there were 100+ senators ready to vote against certification. The “insurrection” happens & they all vote to confirm Biden the “winner”. The details of everything that happened on J6 is still yet fully known. It LOOKS like, at this point, we have a bunch of traitors to our country. I say…things still need to play out. I can not believe Trump walked away without a contingency plan. I can’t believe ALL those senators betrayed our country.

Retired Army Colonel and "informational warfare" specialist lets slip that he sent the Powerpoint — Hot off the presses, as some say ... Phil Waldron, a retired Army colonel and an influential voice in the movement to challenge the election, said on Friday from a bar he owns outside Austin, Texas, that he had circulated the document — titled... dailykos.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Oh…I forgot to post a link in the previous tweet that went along with Col Waldron’s PowerPoint item about Dominion getting $400M from China. There’s some more tidbits in this article about Dominion. Look this article up. Twitter won’t let me post it Plus they got a bunch in “settlements”. We are all fully aware of how the launder money. Did Fox get money from China? 🤔

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

There is a theory that Trump put the protection of the fundamental core of our government in the hands of the military. Which…seems to make sense. I KNOW Trump loves our country & would not abandon Her or all of us. In war, things are ugly & tough decisions are made. We haven’t seen everything play out yet. I believe there are moves & counter moves happening. Such as this tidbit…the Brunson brother’s case. Based on “National Emergency” that bypassed all lower courts & went straight to SCOTUS. Someone at SCOTUS helped them frame. We don’t know yet if something will actually come of it, or if it was used to put people in a kind of choke hold. Note in this clip that Byrne explained it puts everyone in Congress on notice….”do something dumb & you’re all gone right now”. And, notice his elation in the news….he knows our country is protected from huge fundamental changes as the rest of the war plays out.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the Bronson case, which has made it to the Supreme Court. The case argues that there was a legal obligation to investigate the 2020 election under the Electoral Reform Act. The Supreme Court reached out to the Bronson brothers and asked them to rewrite their case as a national emergency. The government appointed a US attorney to represent the 388 members of Congress who voted to accept the electoral votes without investigating. The Supreme Court now has the power to dismiss these individuals from office, including President Biden and Vice President Harris, if they engage in any questionable actions. The video suggests that the Supreme Court has a loaded gun and can take action if necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, boobies. Patrick here. Talk to you about this Bronson case. What a case. What a sleeper. What a, a, unforeseen bumper shot. Okay. The Brunson's are these brothers out of Ogden, Utah. Go Utah. And this case is quite interesting. The theory, it's made it to the Supreme Court under very unusual circumstances that you really need to understand. This is a sleeper. There's stuff going on behind the scenes. Okay. The theory of this case is It doesn't get into asking the courts to decide whether the election was of 2020 was defective or it points out that it was procedurally defective and how the electoral votes were counted in the following way. When those Challenges were made. There was a legal obligation created by the 18/71 Electoral Reform Act or 18/77 something rather. But there was a legal obligation to investigate for 10 days between it and something Ted Cruz did and what he had followed. And the objection, there was a legal obligation. By all these people in congress to investigate that we might be under foreign attack and blah, blah, blah. They failed to do so. Doing so was itself Whether or not the underlying case without even having to opine on that, the Supreme Court would not need to opine that that fundamental underlying case was correct to say you had an obligation and you failed in your constitutional duty to investigate which is the demand of the law. So on that basis, Well, different versions the brothers filed different versions of this in at least 2 different federal districts and that's not a tactic unknown to the America project. On Tuesday, you're gonna be hearing about the same kind of thing from us but maybe involving a different issue, but there's a they filed in different places and through some combination of well, they filed that argument and it's been in this circuit, the 10th circuit and I what was that? The 4th, I forget. But the thing is, Now, they've been public about this. I've heard this back channel. The supreme court reached out to them in the middle of October and said, how quickly can you get this filed out with us or how can you can you quickly get something done and filed with us? And they said, well, we're stuck in the 10th circuit. The Supreme Court said, well, under rule 11, you can skip and go right to the Supreme Court if it's a national emergency. Why don't you rewrite this as a national emergency? And the guys the Supreme Court clerk called down and told them that presumably someone who was whispering in his ear. So they re and the guy asked can I have weeks and they said, no? Get it done in a week. So they got it done in a week and filed it back in. The Supreme Court took it, like, October 20th, 23rd, 23rd. They asked for the government to respond. The government had until Wednesday, November 23rd, 25th. Just the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, just 5 days ago, 4 days ago. And 5 days ago. And the government, somewhere along the way, they had appointed and everyone named in the case of the 388 members of congress who voted to accept the electoral votes without investigating which was their constitutional duty. Notwithstanding any argument about what the underlying assertion was, the fact that there was objections and those objections were ignored is in fact, Per this argument, a violation of their constitutional oath. So it's against 388 members of Congress, as well as Biden and Harris. The The Supreme Court said calls up October 20th and says, get us that case and the people of their own pro se, but they've got some Usd usual people in the background helping them. They all write they they got it in a week later on this new ground. Oh, And then, understand it's a national security emergency. The 10th circuit found out what they were doing. The 10th circuit, which have been sitting on it for months found out when they were doing it, they quickly issued something, a decision against them. So which meant it just kinda changed what they, how they oh, just got a message about this. It just means they changed the NASA's. They didn't have to use that national security. They recast it without the national security, got it in and now it gets especially weird. The Government had appointed a US attorney to represent all 388 people. That person backed out or that person dropped it from the DOJ. That the DOJ dropped it. At which point the solicitor general stepped up and said, I will be defending this. And he did not object on Wednesday. When Wednesday came, they did not file for an extension. They did not file for this or for that. They just didn't file an answer, which means supreme court can now meet on this and anytime they want, they don't even have to have a public hearing. They don't even have to have a public hearing. They could because the other side is unopposed and on the facts and law, they can actually just look at everything and Now why is this so important? There is some scuttlebutt that the last desperate act of the coup is planned Has been planned right now, it's for this lame duck session of congress. All kinds of funny things happen during lame duck sessions of congress. For example, the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve, as my friend Juan Savin Points out was affected in the lame duck session of congress is when they passed it in 2013. The income tax, they restructured America as they knew when they were on the way out before the guys would come in and there were no costs, political cost to be paid. They did these crazy radical stuff that changed America. Yeah. There has been suspicion that they that Biden and a compliant enough democratic house and senate Would right now go along with something whack job like they're gonna expand the Supreme Court and stack it or they're going to who knows what they might be planning on doing right in this lame duck session of congress. Well, This basically gives this case, now the Supreme Court has reached in, taken it, blown it up, Dressed it up, said rewrite it this way. Okay. You don't need that anymore. Okay. Good. We got it. Thanks. We got it from here. They have it and the solicitor general of the United States didn't even Pose that the Supreme Court of the United States is now in the position to do anything they want with that case. They have a loaded gun with a hammer cock being held to the head of congress. If congress gets together and tries any happy horseshit, like I was just saying, like stacking the supreme court are doing some crazy thing on the way out. If they did that in in an hour, the supreme court can pull the pull Pull the trigger and this and now what is the remedy sought? The remedy sought is to dismiss all 388 people from office, Just to dismiss them from office. Just to dismiss them from office, like the park police, the Capitol police being informed and giving orders to escort these 388 people off the grounds. If that hat off the grounds of the capital, everyone who voted to accept electoral votes count them without investigating. It would also give the power to the Supreme Court. Pardon me. Perhaps same thing to happen to 1 president Joseph Biden and Kamala Harris b p Kamala Harris, they would just be escorted off per per such a decision. The way this is structured, The Supreme Court wouldn't have to find that the 2020 election was fraudulent. It just would have to say, there were valid objections made. These people had a constitutional duty to investigate, they failed to, their subsequent acts are nullified and the man who was president and never Seated. Never conceded and did a formal handover. He has then just technically remained the president all this time Is what that decision is asking is actually the remedy that's being sought. It puts the power the Supreme Supreme court is now 1 hour away. Anytime they want, they can pull the trigger on that and make that happen. They have that bullet locked and loaded it in the chamber if any monkey business starts going on between now and January 3rd. Do you think these Nancy Pelosi types are gonna go out without trying to do something crazy? Is now they can pull the trigger and it isn't like they're overturning the election in 2020. They're just saying that election nullified and the underlying guy who never surrendered, never conceded, never surrendered. He actually has just remained president all this time. The secret service To escort the other guys out of the White House, Donald Trump will be present. Now is that far fetched? Of a lot less far fetched than it was a month ago. The supreme court reached in and helped create that set of circumstances. The supreme court Has has now gotten a loaded gun that is holding in the hand in in at the head of this administration. It can pull the trigger any time they won. And behind the scenes, I've been hearing scuttlebutt about crazy machinations and things the democrats thought they might pull off in the last few weeks. They now have a gun held to their head. If they do something like that, this whole government gets dismissed by the supreme court. Right on.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

We are in a whole new kind of war. There will a lot of “what about this…what about that…”🤷‍♀️. But I do know in war there are tough decisions to make. Byrne has repeatedly asked for peace. He has warned against China wanting our country. The discomfort we have been experiencing is way better than 90% of us starving to death & being rape/pillaged/killed to ultimately hand over our land to China. The article he refers to in this interview 👇🏻 https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reality is chaotic and difficult to understand for those who haven't experienced it. There are concerns about the fragility of America's supply chains, particularly in terms of food, fuel, and pharmaceuticals. Cities only have about three days' worth of food, and after two weeks, the situation becomes irreversible. The interruption of fuel supply leads to a halt in food distribution. Additionally, there is a 30-day supply of pharmaceuticals, and many people rely on them for survival. If a civil war were to occur, it is predicted that 90% of the population would die within a year due to supply chain collapse. This is seen as part of a Chinese plan to colonize and occupy the US. A speech by the Chinese Minister of Defense in 2003 supports this theory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Reality. I remember explosions, random explosions, like, 2 blocks down. I mean, it's, aerial bombings. You know? This is I I I don't think any I don't think people that have not lived through that understand what that means, and it is chaotic generations. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I didn't even go further. There's that issue, and then there's another issue, which is it was modeled out 20 years ago in America. What happens if there's a financial collapse or an EMP or whatever? And in all cases, we try to be much more fragile than we intuitively understand. America is alive because of All these dozens of invisible supply chains and 3 key ones being food, fuel, and pharmaceuticals. Mhmm. Food and cities, there's only 3 days of food in the cities. There's 9 meals and then your kids are starving. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: That will get violent after 3 days, and after 2 weeks, it will be through a tipping point that it cannot come back. Fuel fuel once the fuel stops flowing, then the diesel truck stops flowing. Once they stop flowing, food stops flowing, Fuel more fuel stops flowing. Again, the system unspools. And plus third, pharmaceuticals. There's 30 days of pharmaceuticals in the supply chain. 50% of men 50% of people over 50 are walking around with conditions that without the right pharmaceuticals, you're dead in 6 months. Mhmm. So and that includes every diabetic. So every diabetic starts dying in 30 days. So if we go to civil war, it's been modeled, and unfortunately, 90% of us die From this over 1 year 1 year, 90% died from the supply chain collapse. So I think that's the Chinese plan. They want that to happen. We collapse. As we collapse, then the cartels get 3 years to rate, pillage, loot, and burn, and we are a husk That the Chinese colonized and occupied by 2028. And if you if this sounds extreme, I'm gonna give you a link to the speech by the minister of defense China, the highest level leak in Chinese history, which explained in 2003 how the day is gonna come when they hit the US with a bioweapon. Cartels rape pillage loot and burn, occupy us, and thereby solve the problem that for 25 100 years, bedoubled the Han race, which is lack of Arab a land. So it's in their own speech. It's not me. It's in their own material.
The Secret Speech of General Chi Haotian In 2005, The Epoch Times acquired a secret speech given by Defense Minister Chi Haotian to high-level Communist Party Cadres sometime before his retirement in 2003. Details given in Chi’s speech coincide with previously unpublished defector testimony on Sino-Russian military plans. The speech follows: Comrades, I’m very excited today, because the large-scale online survey sina.com… jrnyquist.blog

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Part of this war is opening our eyes to all that has been hidden. Think of everything we have learned about our government, not only the dirty deeds, but also we’ve learned (or relearned) the functions of government. And look who has revealed themselves, as traitors, cowards or just plain egomaniacs. (Even some good guys have proven they have allowed their desire to “be a hero” to override what’s good for the “fight”.) I would argue, we have learned stuff about ourselves. If Trump had taken a heavy hand, we would never have learned all we did. And on a grand scale- we wouldn’t have seen the China infiltration. There is still more that will come. Will you be ready to accept it & help others to learn the truth? And as this war plays out, the deepstate will try to fear us into bending a knee. Will you help your family & friends stay calm & help them stand even in the face of fear?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their concerns about various issues, including the border invasion, changes in culture, and the COVID narrative. Despite these concerns, Speaker 1 expresses optimism about the future, believing that the truth will be revealed and that society is moving away from certain behaviors. Speaker 0 acknowledges that there are still some people who continue to wear masks, but overall, they see a shift in society's mindset. Speaker 1 explains that fear plays a role in people's behavior, as it causes them to think from their amygdala instead of their frontal lobe, making them less receptive to logic. The speakers also mention their struggles in trying to reason with others who are thinking from a place of fear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. So, Patrick, when we're before the interview, you had actually regardless of all the horrible things happening and, you know, let me take a sec to list them out here. You know, we've been covering the border invasion. We've been covering the we call it invasion of all kinds. Right? Border invasion, invasion of our schools, invasion of our judicial system, Invasion of our of our legislature, pretty much invasion across the board, medical industrial complex, you know, military industrial complex, everything seems to have been invaded in some form or another, in terms of these massive changes that we're trying to see pushed through in our culture. Right? Sec. You you said though that you are positive about you have positive feelings about what the future might hold. Let's talk about that for a sec. Speaker 1: Quite positive because, you know, the the cover up is over. There are people living under Iraq who are still buying into the program, but it's the first step. Well, you know, they were the apocalypse. Sec. Apocalypse really doesn't mean, you know, a big napalm strike. Apocalypse means uncovering. Mhmm. The cover, like the eclipse. So it's an uncovering and the apocalypse that may be upon us, sec. Well, that is upon us. Maybe a great uncovering of a great deal of truth and a great deal of facts. Sec. And that it just may take the truth. And it can't make people knowing the truth about things. And If that's where we are, we can get out of this without a war, we can get out of this with a civil war, without anyone dying. I'm a big proponent of what's called truth and reconciliation. I don't I know I don't have many fans on my side, on our side of the table on on this one. But once in a while Well, before before anyway, it's about so I think that we're very close to the truth coming out about everything. In fact, the truth already has, Who do you meet that buys into the COVID narrative anymore? Mhmm. Everybody you know, once in a while, I'm planning to see a few idiots sitting there with their shields on, but it's almost sec. 98%. It seems no one buys into that. That being all kinds of things. BLM is bankrupt. BLM has turned out to be. So so many of these things have, you know, I I saw there's a good clip on Twitter. They have a woman in Oakland, old lefty Oakland, And she's a woman standing up, screaming at the town council about the violence and saying, basically, we've had enough your with your ideology. We gotta have sec Everyone's getting assaulted. There's got to be long order. So just that we're at the point of the veil is lifting, that's step 1, that gives me great hope. And the veil, Don't you feel the veil lifting across society? Speaker 0: I do. I do. But there is always, like, I don't know. There's still that 10% just walking around with mask on, I think, oh my god, are you are you guys completely out of your minds? In fact, it reminds me of I think it was Joe Gilbert on the show said that, the ancient Greeks proved that masks don't work, so it's been a good 25 100 years. So you wonder why some of these people are still doing that. I mean, the brainwashing doesn't seem to have left sec some, but, yes, I do see 90% of society, at least, you know, moving away from that sort of behavior. Speaker 1: You know why? It's when they it's part of the SIOP that they so frighten everybody. Mhmm. People are frightened. They stop making from their frontal lobe, And they start which is, you know, which is basically the the motherboard, the the thing that's special. They start thinking from the amygdala. The part of the brain that controls fight or flight. It's why crucial part of the SIOP has been about frightening people as much as they can. When you're thick from your amygdala, you take, you become impervious to logic, And you folk look for herd, you become a herd animal, and you just look at what the herd's doing and you do that. So trying to reason with someone who's thinking from their amygdala Is like trying to reason with a drowning man. You can't do it. I'm sure you've had your experiences in the last few years that I'm talking to Relatives about like, here's the data on COVID, on mass, on vaccines, here's the data on Ivermectin, Doesn't matter what the show, they just can't process. That's because they're from a low to shut down. They're thinking of the remainder line.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

As far as what happens next… We “fight” with all we have. Elections are States’ responsibilities. And States are citizens’ responsibilities. We allowed this mess by being “fat & sassy”. Now we have to get ourselves out of it. We are not without hope. The larger picture is going to play out. We do not have all the information at is playing out behind the scenes. However, we can make a difference in our own state/county/precinct. Let’s practice a modified serenity prayer. God, please grant me serenity with things I can not change, the fortitude to help change the things I can & the wisdom to know the difference. No matter what state you are in, encourage everyone you know to get involved: Become PCs, Volunteer at great organizations making a difference, Volunteer to be the eyes & hands in the elections, and encourage people to run for office & to vote. It’s going to take all of us to get through this. Many hands make light work. I have things I will be doing, I hope you will too. Part of my plan? Get Byrne’s article & the truth about the voting machines in the hands of every one I talk to. How? The same way I did COVID, masks, & the audit…create items to handout (pamphlets, buttons, stickers, shirts), emails & phone calls. The key is: Do what you can to help, never give up, stay peaceful & we will come out the other side together.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of truth and reconciliation and suggests that everyone should remain calm until the 2024 election. They mention concerns about Trump winning and the potential for violence. They emphasize the importance of working on election integrity, such as cleaning voter rolls and taking action on election day. The speaker expresses fear that there may be attempts to provoke a civil war or impose martial law. They believe that reasonable behavior can prevent extreme measures, but warn against doubling down on divisive actions like another COVID-19 situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Earlier, we were talking when we were talking about truth and reconciliation, it sounded like you were saying that election 2024 is gonna come. We should all be cool until then. Let's you know, no violence. Nothing. Let's just let the election happen. And then after that, the truth and reconciliation comes. I guess, what I deciphered from that is that, you think that Trump's going to win, hence, and therefore, there's gonna be a chance for so you shouldn't. Speaker 1: Well, I wouldn't say that we sit back into the election. We have to work like madmen to get We have to work like mad men to get, on election integrity, and you can do stuff anywhere you are watching this. You can work on your voter rolls. What we've learned is for them to stuff the ballot box. They first stuff the voter rolls. So every calendar efforts to clean voter rolls, They just they're discovering hundreds of thousands, millions of votes in New York from 2020. I mean, they're just realizing that our voter rolls on that country are just Filled with slot. So that's one thing to get involved with and also election integrity action efforts on election day. So that's one thing. I have red lines where I say, so I'm all about peace. I'm afraid that they're going to try some kooky stuff. What What they're going to try to do is get it either there'll be a nuclear, a limited nuclear exchange, or they'll get a civil war going. They'll So they'll say white nationalists have started this and that. We need to have a police state. Are they gonna say get a civil war going from among the Our new guests in the country, they'll get a civil war going. But somewhere is another it needs the federal government to do a martial law. I want you to know we can't have an election. I'm afraid they're going down that path, and that's not that's, that would be disheartening if they go down that path. That's not gonna work I need them I wish I think that they were afraid, and I know that they're afraid because they talked to journalists and journalists asked me questions. And so I know what they're thinking. And what they're thinking is we're gonna hang 1500 of them. We're not gonna hang 1500 of them, especially if everyone starts being reasonable. And we but If they keep doubling down and doubling down, if they try to do another, you know, COVID nineteen thing. Anyway, so what do you think

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

A lot of you are saying “yeah, but…” I get it. There are many “battles” going on. We are a swarm of killer bees trying to puncture what seems like impenetrable skin. We WILL break through..we have already made progress. Remember, the act of covering up, tampering with evidence & refusing information IS evidence. Maricopa county had 6 months to tamper with those boxes. I saw the fake ballots first hand. I saw the patterns they used to stuff Biden & Trump ballots. Yes, Trump ballots. They had to get Trump votes in those boxes of fake Biden ballots. Nothing anyone says will change that fact. Now we let all the legal stuff play out. Remember-no court has heard the evidence. Even Lake’s case, the judge limited what could be presented, limited the time frame to do it & set unprecedented standards. There are MANY cases that never got the evidence heard. And not ONE public court has heard the evidence of the foreign interference…yet. Lake’s case is a slam dunk. It will go to SCOTUS. And if you’ve been paying attention, SCOTUS has been issuing fair judgements. Didn’t they just affirm that it’s not a RIGHT to have the world bend to “your” will? I don’t think they will fail us. And I am confident that there are contingencies upon contingencies upon contingencies in this war. Be fluid. Roll with the punches. Stay focused on our task. And pray. #PowerOfPrayer I’ll end this for now. I’m sure there will be more to this story.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Found a shareable link to the affidavit that shows IP addresses & foreign interference https://www.scribd.com/document/485933370/gov-uscourts-mied-350905-1-15#from_embed Wasn’t there a debate on if scorecard (vote flipping software) was in use? Bunch of nuggets in this document.

Declaration of XXXXXXXXX.: (Redacted) Location in The United States of America | PDF | Digital Forensics | Computer Security gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Exhibit 7 scribd.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I’ve got more to add to the thread. I had forgotten I did a thread on the speech about China mentioned above. It’s worth the time to check it out. I have some more Byrne clips in there. With Byrne it’s all about putting pieces together.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Adding Loy Brunson’s interview. As I’ve shown you, above, Congress were made aware of foreign interference. They had a DUTY to uphold their oath to investigate the claim. This lawsuit will be historical. But, as Loy stated-SCOTUS needs to know they have our support. There have been ~80k letters sent. I hope it becomes at least 80M!

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Byrne did a Live Locals. A few significant updates 1) he’s in France/Italy & has been gathering evidence that “should” impeach Biden

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not on vacation in Europe, even though it may seem that way. I'm actually here working for you all. I have obtained something on this trip that, in the past, could have led to the president's impeachment if posted online. I have evidence that makes it very easy to impeach Joe Biden for criminal activity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'm not over here in Europe vacationing, though, though it may look it. I'm not over here vacationing. I am doing work for you folks. I'll tell you because I already have it back in America that I obtained something on this trip that at any previous age, in any previous age, I would you could post online, and and the president would be impeached the next week. I got stuff that it makes it absolutely easy to impeach Joe Biden and criminal activity on me hard and I got it.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

2) Byrne gives an update on Michigan “we have them dead to rights”. Reminds when he said “I caught you all mother F’ers” at the ReAwaking tour. As we see from his article - he’s not hyperbolic.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Michigan, after the 2020 election, the secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, issued an order for the submission of election materials. Many people disobeyed this order and turned in the materials to their local sheriffs, who then initiated a law enforcement investigation. Sheriffs are the primary law enforcement officers responsible for investigating election fraud. Some town and county clerks also turned in the materials and hired attorney Stephanie Lambert, along with experts Ben Cotton, Eric Spakim, and Jim Penrose, to examine them. These experts found evidence of wrongdoing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. In Michigan, the day after the election no. 2020 or couple weeks after, the Soros goon, who's the secretary of state, Jocelyn Benson, sent instructions to everybody involved in elections into a race, their thumb thumb drives, e poll books, all that stuff. Totally lawless order. A whole bunch of people disobeyed, went to their local sheriffs, turn it in, those sheriffs started a law enforcement investigation. Per the federal law, the state law, and the common law, sheriffs are the primary law enforcement officers don't have anything to do with election fraud. They're the 1st to investigate. Well, and these local officials turned their materials in. A couple town clerks or county clerks, rec record county recorders did the same thing. Those people hired a Michigan attorney who's a 12 year Detroit named Stephanie Lambert. Stephanie, hired lots of really qualified experts, Ben Cotton, Eric Spakim, Jim Penrose, they tore through this stuff, and they found everything. We have every these guys have everything.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

3) I find it interesting that Byrne’s “end of summer” to find out why he hasn’t been doing live locals lately, Loy Brunson’s “have through summer” to get letters to SCOTUS, & the hint about SCOTUS that Rachel made & Byrne confirmed he heard the same thing. Could it be a release of more pieces of the puzzle? Could it be a convergence of paths? 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been doing this less frequently, but you will understand why soon. Anyway, I hope to settle the beef before the summer is over.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You folks will understand sometime soon why I've been somewhat I've been doing this less frequently, but you'll understand sometime soon. But anyway, beef before the summer's over kind of thing, I I hope

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

I know that we are exhausting the remedies at the lower courts - necessary to get to SCOTUS (it also ferrets out the crooked judges) In Byrne’s update he explains the evidence led right back to the crooked SOS & AG & they tried to go after those bringing the cases to court.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the legality of town clerks investigating elections in Michigan and hiring outside parties for investigations. They mention reports from experts that confirm their claims. They accuse the secretary of state and attorney general of Michigan of trying to shut down the investigation and implicate themselves. The speaker explains how Stephanie, funded by the America Project, fought in court to keep the attorney general from taking over the case. They criticize the attorney general for wanting to bring charges against those involved in examining election machines and thumb drives, despite previously instructing to erase the data. The speaker defends the use of expert witnesses and mentions their role as a consultant to the project.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, actually, I mean, I was engaged so the sheriff's engaged Stephanie. All this is perfectly legal. Town clerks have it right there in the red in the black letter law of Michigan. Town clerks have the right to investigate elections in their county if they think something They think there was some mischief. And because they may suspect their own people are corrupt, they have the right to go to an outside party to run the investigation. They did that. They hired Stephanie, and the sheriffs hired Stephanie. So that's totally legal. Well, what do you know? All that material, everything that we Guest in November. It's all true. I've put up here and there some of the reports that have come out of it, the expert reports from It's the Keene from from, Ben Cotton. There's no question. We have him dead to rights. Well, what happened was the Soros goon posing as a secretary of state and the Soros goon posing as an attorney general of Michigan In desperation, all the evidence led right to them. They went after, believe it or not, honest to god, they went after the sheriffs And the town clerk and Stephanie and the expert witnesses, the trail of evidence led to the dirty secretary of state and the dirty attorney general, but those people acted and tried to get the shutdown. 1st, they tried to get it shut down by saying, we are gonna take this investigation over. And Stephanie had to go to work on behalf of the sheriffs. And by the way, you, the America Project, me, we're funding all this. She went or, I mean, a bunch of it. The sheriffs have limited budget. So Stephanie had to fight in court to keep the attorney general from reaching down and taking the case in which the attorney general was implicated, you know, this closed circle of corruption. So then the attorney general Tried to get the office of the attorney general to bring charges against any of these people because they opened an election machine or this to that, and they looked at a thumb drive. And this is all so sacred, and our law says no one can touch this stuff, forgetting that in November 2020, she told everyone to erase it all, but suddenly it's so sacred no one else can touch it. Well, these are all court certified Cyber forensic people and everything. Everyone who's touched it. There's no problem. And lawyers have been using expert witnesses forever, and It sort of upends the whole legal system if suddenly sheriffs can't hire lawyers and lawyers can't hire expert witnesses. Incidentally, I am officially a consultant to that project, which means that sometimes as I do research, I'm actually operating under As a as a consultant to a woman who has a legal contract with some

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Crooked judges will back down when push comes to shove. I wouldn’t put it past a grievance being filed against Judge Thompson. It’s about time we started applying lawfare.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A judge sanctioned and fined someone, but the appellate court overturned it. The person also filed a grievance against the judge and scheduled a deposition with the secretary of state. However, the case was dismissed by the judge who was being investigated, which canceled the deposition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She did 2 things. She made a a judicial referral. Oh, she got sanctioned. She got sanctioned and fined, she appealed it up, the appellate court threw out the fine, threw out the sanction, all that happy horse shit. It's just some crooked judges lower down forget it. But in addition, she went for sanctions against the judge. It turns out there this is what we need to do more of. Turns out the judges have their own sort of special judicial in states that are I forget what it's called, but like a you can go and file a grievance against the judge. Stephanie did that against this judge. I think it's a female judge. And Stephanie filed a grievance against them and noticed the Soros goon, Jocelyn Benson, to be deposed on August 4th. And I posted that the other day on Twitter that She got the authority to interview the secretary of state of Michigan under her state, which would have blown everything under the out of the water because that secretary of state's got to sit there and either lie like hell under oath or is gonna have to reveal the whole scheme. The case just went away yesterday. The case just went away. The judge has dismissed the case. The judge who Stephanie went after for sanctions for being so egregiously outside the law and law fair, just using the law to punish. Stephanie was absolutely in her right to take that case. The clerks absolutely were in their right to It's black and white law in Michigan. The town clerk, after an election, the town can conduct his or her own investigation using county resources or hire private resources to do it right there in the law. So this this case had no business going anywhere to begin with. Well, the judge who herself now has a grievance against her just yesterday unplugged the whole case, which, of course, unplugs the August 4th deposition of the secretary of state.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

And what about the USPS case? The USPS is not going to turn over who paid for that truck even if a federal judge orders them to. Could it be Runbeck? Could it be Pitney Bowes/BlueCrest? 🤔 Which, btw-The judge on that case has been switched out for an Obama appointee. What happens when a government agency goes rogue & the federal judicial system has failed? 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
For two and a half years, we've been trying to find out who paid for the Jesse Morgan truck. The postal service changed their document retention policy from 6 years to 30 days in April 2020, and then changed it back in March 2021. They destroyed some documents after the election. They got a federal judge, Emmett Sullivan, to sign off on this change. When they finally turned over the requested information in October 2020, they had whited out the important dates. Their own lawyer reprimanded them for not following the law. They refuse to disclose the information, even if ordered by a federal judge. The government is going rogue and disrespecting the judge overseeing the case. The new judge is an Obama appointee, and it seems like they're trying to delay until their own people are in power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been trying for two and a half years to find out who paid for that Jesse Morgan truck. For 2 years, they danced and fought and fought. Now that's supposed to be public records, but the postal service changed their look back policy from keeping documents for 6 years to keeping documents for 30 days. They changed that in April 2020. They got through the election, destroyed a bunch of stuff. In March 2021, they changed it back to 6 years. Just you know, federal agencies can't do that willy nilly. There's something called the Administrative Procedures Act where they have to put it up for public comment, explain things, get comment, go back. It's been around 50 years, this system. They can't just do that willy nilly unless they get a federal judge to sign off on it. In this case, the postal service got a federal judge to sign off on it. It was the Emmett Sullivan, who's the same knucklehead who went after an inquisition on Michael Flynn after the DOJ dropped the charges, after they did their own internal investigation, said this should never been brought, we dropped the charges. That judge would not and at first in America, that judge would not let it go. Well, that's Emmett Sullivan, intellectual doofus, same judge who signed off. I'm living in the postal service, play these Mickey Mouse games. So we fought for 2 years. They finally finally had to turn the piece of paper over. And when they turned it over, which was October 2020, the payments they made, they had they left everything in for all of October except for the 2 or 3 days we cared about. Those dates, the information they wiped out, they whited out. Their own lawyer said you can't do this. Their own DOJ lawyer reprimanded them and sent a letter that got into our heads. Was like, you have to start following the law, telling his own client, the judge has said you got to turn it over, turn it over. They turned it over, it was whited out. We went back and they said that's right. They've answered now in writing. We are never going to tell you that information that was in those 3 lines we whited out. We're not gonna tell it. Even if we get an order from a federal judge, we are not closed out. So that's the government going rogue. That is the government going rogue. They are now giving a finger to a sitting federal judge. But guess what? The federal judge that was over this case and managing it correctly, albeit slowly in my view, but correctly, that judge got promoted, and a new judge got moved in to take the case, and that's a Obama appointee. So I guess they just think they can do this all over the country everywhere, this tap dancing until all of their totalitarian people have been moved into place and then everything becomes moot. But it doesn't work like that.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

To tie it back to the start of this thread… The article that features Byrne is super important WE make it go viral. Media is ignoring him & his story & is too scared to touch it. I shared it with @gatewaypundit thinking Jim isn’t scared of anything. Nothing yet. You can download a copy for free from Byrne’s DeepCapture website https://www.deepcapture.com/2023/07/patrick-byrne-dhs-domestic-extremist-1-comes-clean/ You can also buy a hard copy from Amazon. Search “domestic extremist #1”. Twitter won’t let me post a link. I couldn’t get my hubby to read the electronic version, but he’s reading the magazine. Buy copies for family & friends. Guaranteed this will be a historical document. Or wait to buy an autographed copy - Byrne May do a fundraiser to help fund all these projects.

DHS Domestic Extremist #1 Comes Clean – Deep Capture deepcapture.com
Saved - September 9, 2023 at 2:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1866, the Milligan Supreme Court case challenged the arrest and trial of Lambdin P. Milligan by a military court during the American Civil War. Milligan argued that his trial violated the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court ruled that military tribunals trying civilians when civilian courts were available was unconstitutional. This landmark case affirmed civil liberties and set limits on military authority in both peacetime and wartime, emphasizing the government's obligation to uphold the Constitution during crises.

@MaxMurrayTweets - Max Murray

The government must adhere to the Constitution even in times of crisis: The Milligan Supreme Court case, also known as Ex parte Milligan, was a significant legal case in 1866. It involved Lambdin P. Milligan, a civilian citizen from Indiana who was arrested and found guilty by a military court for plotting against the Union during the American Civil War. Milligan argued that his trial violated both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, particularly the right to a trial by jury. The case raised important questions about the suspension of habeas corpus during times of war and the authority of military tribunals to try civilians. The Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling, held that the use of military tribunals to try civilians when civilian courts were available was unconstitutional. The court concluded that the Constitution remained in effect even during times of war, and that civilians could only be tried in civilian courts unless those courts were unable to function. The Milligan case affirmed the importance of civil liberties and established limits on military authority during peacetime and wartime. It solidified the principle that the government must adhere to the Constitution even in times of crisis.

Saved - November 8, 2023 at 6:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump made changes to the military courts, expanding their jurisdiction and introducing civilian components. The accused have some rights removed and restrictions on sealing information. The U.S. Attorney General can provide guidance to military courts, and military prosecutors can guide federal courts. Military investigators can provide findings for federal trials. Trump also updated the UCMJ, the first time since 1984. Previous administrations changed the MCM, affecting civilians. Trump's actions show he cares about military justice. Courts-martial have exclusive jurisdiction over military offenses, but acts violating both UCMJ and local criminal law can be tried by both military and civilian tribunals. Jurisdiction is determined by nations, states, and agencies, not the suspect or accused.

@TheReal40_Head - 40_Head

3/7. Most of the changes made by Trump have more to do with the introduction of CIVILIAN components to the military courts AND the scope and jurisdiction of which the MCM can be applied. There are some rights of the accused removed, and there are some new restrictions placed on sealing information meaning these bastards can't hide behind sealed records once this all goes down. You may want to read this in your spare time, it is lengthy but valuable. I read the whole thing and I'm confident this will become integral to obtaining the justice we seek. There's something else for you to see. "Sec. 12. In accordance with Article 33 of the UCMJ, as amended by section 5204 of the MJA, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, will issue nonbinding guidance regarding factors that commanders, convening authorities, staff judge advocates, and judge advocates should take into account when exercising their duties with respect to the disposition of charges and specifications in the interest of justice and discipline under Articles 30 and 34 of the UCMJ. That guidance will take into account, with appropriate consideration of military requirements, the principles contained in official guidance of the Attorney General to attorneys for the Federal Government with respect to the disposition of Federal criminal cases in accordance with the principle of fair and evenhanded administration of Federal criminal law." Do you see that? An introduction allowing the U.S. Attorney General to PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO THE MILITARY COURTS and for MILITARY PROSECUTORS to PROVIDE GUIDANCE to the FEDERAL COURTS. MILITARY INVESTIGATORS CAN PROVIDE THEIR FINDINGS FOR USE IN FEDERAL TRIALS. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states/ It's important to understand that the UCMJ itself was also altered by Trump, the first time a president has done so since 1984. So, what were the other presidents updating and altering? Why were there so many changes made to the MCM and NOT to the UCMJ? Are you starting to get a clear picture here folks? "The revamped system went live on Jan. 1 (2019) the first update to the UCMJ since 1984, and, according to officials, the biggest set of changes since the code was enacted after World War II." https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-army/2019/01/15/heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-biggest-update-to-ucmj-in-decades/ The changes made by the previous administrations since 1984 changed the MCM, which can and does have the ability to affect the civilian population. But, no president since 1984 has actually updated the code for uniformed service member. So Trump, in all of his "Promises Made, Promises Kept" actions, has once again PROVEN he cares about more than other presidents did. He wasn't making changes to protect himself like they were. I bet you only heard about the civilian criminal justice reform, didn't you? Did you even know Trump was working to better our military legal system as well? Sooo...are you ready for this MAJOR BOOM? (I've added capitalization in areas below to show you the points I feel are especially important). I've also placed [brackets] around my comments. "Rule 201. Jurisdiction in general (1) Courts-martial have exclusive jurisdiction of purely military offenses. (2) An act or omission which violates both the UCMJ and LOCAL CRIMINAL LAW, FOREIGN or DOMESTIC, MAY BE TRIED BY A COURT-MARTIAL, OR BY A PROPER CIVILIAN TRIBUNAL, FOREIGN OT DOMESTIC, or, subject to R.C.M. 907(b)(2)(C) and regulations of the Secretary concerned, by both. 3) Where an act or omission is subject to trial by court-martial and by one or more civil tribunals, foreign or domestic, the determination which nation, state, or agency will exercise jurisdiction is a matter for the nations, states, and agencies concerned, AND IS NOT A RIGHT OF THE SUSPECT OR ACCUSED."

Error 404 whitehouse.gov
Here’s what you need to know about the biggest update to UCMJ in decades The services unveiled big changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice with the new year. militarytimes.com
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 11:08 PM

@BakerT34M - BakerT34M_ Confirm_ Talk to me, Johnny!

1.9) Think Justice K (5 to 4). Military Law v Criminal Law “Enemy Combatant” How do you navigate around installed BLOCKADE? How do you REMOVE installed BLOCKADE? DECLAS—DECLAS—DECLAS How do you navigate around installed corrupt [FBI][DOJ]? USE A STEALTH BOMBER Year determined? https://t.co/20vXVWNkYE

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 6:56 PM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

They’ve destroyed every rotten, corrupt and perfidious institutions including court houses across America to get Trump. In other words the November 5, 2024 Insurrection is underway. https://t.co/ixTatFf8Sq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have evidence that the FBI interfered in the 2016 election and then tried to destroy the Trump administration when Hillary Clinton lost. They also accuse the CIA of interfering in the 2020 election by dismissing the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation. The speaker believes that there will be election interference in 2024, as there have been no consequences for previous interference. They suggest that if a Republican president and attorney general are elected, they will investigate and charge those responsible for election interference. The speaker believes that the intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice are scared of this possibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now have black and white evidence that the FBI interfered in the 2016 election. And then when they fail to get their candidate elected, Hillary Clinton, then they just set out to destroy the Trump administration. So then go back and go up to 2020. It was the CIA this time that got involved in the 2020 election with those 51 former intel agents who talked about the Hunter Biden laptop as total Russian disinformation. So they've gotten away with it for 2 elections. They're for sure gonna get away with it, try to get away with it in 24, right, because there's no consequence. The difference is in 2024, the evidence is there. We now have the Durham investigation. We have all the congressional investigations. There is now hard evidence that there was election interference by the US intelligence agencies and the Department of Justice. They've gotta be terrified. Those individuals have to be terrified that a Republican president comes in in the 2024 election with a Republican attorney general, investigates them, and charges them all with the crimes they've committed over the last 8 years. Speaker 1: Well, we'll see about that. You're right. There are questions around these elections because of this Interference, do you think there will be election interference then in 24? Speaker 0: Take it to the bank. They will absolutely interfere in 2024. We're not sure how, but they will absolutely interfere, not only because they're not gonna like whoever the Republican candidate is, but because they're gonna protect their own hides. That's why they're they were talking to their own people, and the whistleblowers have brought this up, that they were told, don't put anything on paper. Just tell us orally. They knew that they were doing stuff wrong. They knew that they were gonna be liable for prosecution.
Saved - March 1, 2024 at 1:51 AM

@dilanesper - Dilan Esper

This "the courts are slow-walking Trump's immunity claim" narrative (for the most part coming from non-lawyers who don't understand anything about the system) is truly pissing me off. So here's the real story. 1/

Saved - June 1, 2024 at 4:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US is entering uncharted waters as Donald Trump becomes the first president to be indicted. Trust in the courts is crucial to prevent violence. In Rome, office holders were immune from prosecution, but Caesar's enemies wanted to prosecute him. Caesar tried to run for consul again to maintain immunity, but his enemies forced him into a dilemma. Caesar chose to start a civil war, crossing the Rubicon in 49 BC. Political trials can become dangerous without a neutral arbiter, leading to violence. The stakes have been raised, and history teaches us the consequences.

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

The US is entering uncharted waters. Political prosecutions are what brought down the Roman Republic. Here's how. 🧵 https://t.co/eqcYcxMT7Q

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Donald Trump is the first US president to be indicted, let alone ruled a felon by a US court. The court system of any society is designed to be a neutral arbiter of disputes; Trust in the courts is crucial to prevent spirals of retributive violence. https://t.co/8vjynQVdZJ

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

In Rome, an office holder was immune from prosecution while holding office A consul could not be prosecuted during his 1 year term Same for a "proconsul" = a consul w/ term extended, usually serving as a general or provincial governor in 50 BC, Julius Caesar was a Proconsul. https://t.co/VAgu1jPLFr

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Caesar's enemies - Cato and friends - were publicly vowing to prosecute Caesar when his term ended Caesar had been a successful general for nearly 10 years, conquered all of Gaul Cato claimed they had 10 years worth of crimes to prosecute him for. https://t.co/bE0Ou1q5tx

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Caesar wanted to run for Consul again, to renew his immunity. Unfortunately, to run for consul in Rome, you have to lay down your proconsular office & enter the city. Caesar would have to become a private citizen in Rome for several months (Plenty of time for a prosecution) https://t.co/KfvnBmjGzE

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Caesar asked the authorities for an exception - to "run in absentia" (in recognition of his achievements on behalf of Rome) Thus he could keep immunity over the transition to new office In 52, a law was passed to allow this But by 50, Caesar's enemies had unwound the law.

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Cato & Friends now forced Caesar into a dilemma: Either a) Lay down your office & face prosecution, OR b) start a Civil War (in 50, Caesar's legal term of office was expiring) https://t.co/5zc7MT94GJ

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Cato & Friends drew Rome's other greatest leader, Pompey, onto their side Caesar tried to negotiate Pompey dug in his heels Ultimatums were issued. They all thought Caesar would back down. https://t.co/0M6kycGca5

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

Caesar took the Nuclear Option and crossed the Rubicon in January, 49 BC (The Rubicon River was the boundary of Caesar's province: crossing it amounted to a declaration of war) This explains why political trials can become so dangerous: https://t.co/HGFmPkpIPk

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

If there is no neutral arbiter, the recourse is usually violence Caesar claimed Cato & Senate were corrupt, motivated by personal animosity (they did undo some laws, after all) Cato & co. said "Caesar is a threat to the Republic" Who could adjudicate, except the gods of war? https://t.co/xIyeJevB0Q

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

The threat of prosecution motivates heads of state to cling to power in many "third world" countries. A precedent has been set. The Biden family now have reason to fear prosecution if they lose the election The stakes have been raised, massively https://t.co/LuX4vZuEtN

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

From Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon in 49 BC ... to avoid political prosecution Until Actium in 31 BC, Rome passed through a long period of civil war Which ended in the establishment of a monarchy. Is the die cast? This is why we study history. https://t.co/iKz01GuigN

@costofglory - Alex Petkas - Cost of Glory

For the full story, listen to some of my bios from the Cost of Glory Podcast. Such as Pompey, Episodes 83-85 https://t.co/9URRccHmpC

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 5:00 PM

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Last June, the Supreme Court held the DC district and circuit courts politically persecuted J6 defendants. So those two DC lower courts must face serious congressional oversight, funding cuts, jurisdiction changes, and other reforms. @Article3Project will ensure that happens.

Saved - February 8, 2025 at 11:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am outraged by Judge Paul Engelmayer's ruling that prevents all of Trump's political appointees, including the Treasury Secretary, from accessing Treasury Department data. This decision, made without legal precedent or input from the Trump administration, undermines executive authority and transfers power to unelected bureaucrats. It feels like a blatant judicial power grab, and I believe it sets a dangerous precedent for future cases. The Supreme Court must intervene to restore constitutional governance and prevent further judicial overreach.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Total BS…

@SenTomCotton - Tom Cotton

Outrageous. Obama Judge Paul Engelmayer didn’t just bar @elonmusk and @doge from Treasury systems, he barred the Secretary of the Treasury himself. Without citing a single law or even allowing Trump admin to appear in court! This outlaw should be reversed immediately and Engelmayer should be forbidden by higher courts from ever hearing another case against the Trump admin. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/federal-judge-blocks-elon-musks-doge-from-treasury-system-e0f1e55c?st=QQJrvW&reflink=article_imessage_share

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 7:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Paul Engelmayer issued a ruling preventing Trump's political appointees, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, from accessing Treasury Department data, which critics argue undermines executive authority and lacks legal precedent. The decision, made without input from Trump’s legal team, is described as judicial overreach that transfers power to unelected bureaucrats, challenging the Constitution's separation of powers. Supporters of Trump believe this ruling will backfire, asserting that the administration anticipated such judicial actions.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

This ruling will not age well. Remember, Trump wants this. Trump in his team expected this, that the deep state would attempt to use judges to block executive actions from executive branch official. This is all going to be hashed out now not a year or two from now . They are taking their best shot with the judges to stop him. Legally and constitutionally, they have no leg to stand on .

Saved - February 8, 2025 at 11:01 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This is an activist posing as a judge

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 7:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Paul Engelmayer's ruling prohibits Trump's political appointees from accessing Treasury Department data, which critics argue undermines executive authority and violates constitutional principles. The decision, made without notifying Trump's legal team, raises concerns about judicial overreach and the separation of powers. Observers note its potential to set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, allowing judicial activism to influence policy. Calls for intervention from the Supreme Court and public discourse on the implications of this ruling emphasize the need to uphold constitutional governance.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

@patriot_savvy - The REAL Politically Savvy 🇺🇸

🔥This ruling by Judge Engelmayer echoes historical precedents where judicial overreach has threatened executive authority, reminiscent of the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer case where the Supreme Court checked presidential power. 🔥 • It's crucial to remember that the separation of powers, as intended by the framers, is under attack here. This isn't just about Trump; it's about preserving the constitutional framework. • The absence of due process in this decision, where Trump's legal team was excluded, mirrors tactics used in political witch hunts, undermining the fairness of our legal system. • With elections on the horizon, this could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, potentially allowing judicial activism to dictate policy over elected officials' decisions. • The judiciary's role should be to interpret law, not to legislate from the bench. This decision blurs those lines dangerously. • Legal scholars and constitutional experts should weigh in publicly to highlight the overreach and its implications for democratic governance. • Citizens and lawmakers alike need to rally for checks against such judicial oversteps to maintain the balance of power envisioned by our Constitution.

Saved - February 9, 2025 at 2:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m trying to understand this: the Treasury Secretary can’t access treasury data? That’s surprising. It feels like someone is afraid of the secrets being revealed. This judge wasn’t elected and doesn’t represent us. We demand transparency—this is our money, not theirs.

@glennbeck - Glenn Beck

Let me see if I have this right. The Treasury Secretary CANNOT access any data from the treasury? Wow. Who is afraid the secrets are coming out. This judge was not elected nor was he given the mandate by the people. Enough is enough. WE THE PEOPLE demand transparency. IT IS OUR MONEY, NOT YOURS.

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: In an egregious and unconstitutional assault on executive authority, Judge Paul Engelmayer has unilaterally forbidden all of Trump's political appointees—including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent—from accessing Treasury Department data. This ruling, concocted without legal precedent or constitutional justification, is nothing short of judicial sabotage. Worse, it was issued ex parte—meaning Trump administration lawyers weren’t given notice, weren’t allowed to argue, and weren’t even in the room. Only Democrat attorneys general were heard, ensuring a predetermined outcome. Engelmayer’s order is legally indefensible. He cites no statutory basis because none exists. He offers no constitutional rationale because the Constitution directly contradicts him. Instead, he fabricates a fiction: that the duly appointed Treasury Secretary is nothing more than a ceremonial figurehead, akin to a powerless monarch, while unelected bureaucrats—who answer to no voters—control the nation’s finances. This is judicial tyranny masquerading as jurisprudence. The implications are staggering. By stripping the executive branch of access to its own financial data, this ruling effectively transfers control of the federal purse to the permanent bureaucracy—the so-called “deep state.” That is a direct assault on the Constitution’s separation of powers, which vests executive authority in the elected President and his appointees, not in career government employees. This is lawfare at its most brazen: a raw, partisan power grab dressed up in legalese. If allowed to stand, this decision sets the precedent that any left-wing judge can unilaterally strip the President of his authority and hand it to the administrative state. That is not democracy. It is not law. It is judicial dictatorship. While the order is currently set to last only a week, no serious person believes this won’t be extended if the courts think they can get away with it. The Trump Administration should treat this for what it is—an unconstitutional usurpation—and consider defying it outright. No judge has the authority to cripple the executive branch and hand power to unelected bureaucrats. Beyond that, the Supreme Court must intervene and overturn this blatant violation of constitutional governance. Judge Engelmayer should be barred from hearing any future cases related to executive authority, and every Democrat lawyer who enabled this attack on the Constitution should be sanctioned. This is not a legal dispute—it is a coup by the judiciary against the elected government. And it cannot be allowed to stand.

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss a legal principle in contract law: "Fraud vitiates," meaning those who commit fraud shouldn't benefit from their actions. I express frustration with how some individuals manipulate the legal system, particularly in the context of government and constitutional obligations. I critique the legal profession, specifically targeting certain attorneys, and highlight the perceived ease with which they operate in the current political climate. The tone reflects deep dissatisfaction with the legal system and its practitioners.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

There is a legal mechanism in contract law, which is applicable to literally any transaction in any domain. “Fraud vitiates.” People who steal money don’t get to also keep the money they stole, just because they already spent it on weaponizing the legal systems against you. And besides, the federal government isn’t stripping state courts of their functions. They did that themselves when they stopped operating according to their required obligations to the Constitution. Which is what “operating” is for them, dipshit. I always love when the 110-IQ Jew attorneys give us the “there is no mechanism by which…” horseshit. Right after they fucking released a bioweapon, stole billions from everyone and covered it up, then spent the past 5 years giving fuck all of a regard to the Constitution and mechanisms and precedent. I’d imagine being a Jew attorney is probably the easiest, more bullshit job in the world amid Bolshevik Revolution 2. Especially when you get to pick your own Joodges.

@inherentlypolit - inherentlypolitical

@TheoryConspiry @Uwillnot_murder @KAGdrogo @DecentBackup Your open fantasizing is cute but there is no legal mechanism by which the federal government can strip state courts of their ability to function You keep trying to change the subject because you can’t address simple, settle constitutional law You’re just coping

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 8:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed a legal principle in contract law: "Fraud vitiates." It emphasizes that those who commit fraud shouldn't benefit from their actions. I pointed out that the federal government hasn't stripped state courts of their functions; rather, state courts have failed to uphold their constitutional obligations. I expressed frustration with attorneys who dismiss legal mechanisms, especially in light of recent events that seem to undermine the Constitution. I also commented on the perceived ease of being an attorney in today's climate, particularly regarding judicial appointments.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

There is a legal mechanism in contract law, which is applicable to literally any transaction in any domain. “Fraud vitiates.” People who steal money don’t get to also keep the money they stole, just because they already spent it on weaponizing the legal systems against you. And besides, the federal government isn’t stripping state courts of their functions. They did that themselves when they stopped operating according to their required obligations to the Constitution. Which is what “operating” is for them, dipshit. I always love when the 110-IQ Jew attorneys give us the “there is no mechanism by which…” horseshit. Right after they fucking released a bioweapon, stole billions from everyone and covered it up, then spent the past 5 years giving fuck all of a regard to the Constitution and mechanisms and precedent. I’d imagine being a Jew attorney is probably the easiest, most bullshit job in the world amid Bolshevik Revolution 2. Especially when you get to pick your own Joodges.

@inherentlypolit - inherentlypolitical

@TheoryConspiry @Uwillnot_murder @KAGdrogo @DecentBackup Your open fantasizing is cute but there is no legal mechanism by which the federal government can strip state courts of their ability to function You keep trying to change the subject because you can’t address simple, settle constitutional law You’re just coping

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 8:37 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Again, they stopped operating (“functioning”) themselves, the moment they stopped operating in accordance with their Constitutionally-required obligations. Do I need to write it in Yiddish? Or will you continue straw manning in that language too?

@inherentlypolit - inherentlypolitical

@DecentBackup lol sounds good dude, “fraud” doesn’t magically make every court in America stop functioning. Reminder that in states like Wyoming, Mississippi, Texas, states with good republican courts, were not in on the “fraud” Those courts would remain open But keep fantasizing!

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 2:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a thread highlighting the top seven funniest comebacks from Elon Musk. The list includes his responses to AOC, a jab at socialism, a reminder to be gentle with girls, and a critique of Newsom. I also recommended following @ResisttheMS for news not covered by mainstream media and @CNviolations for brutal community notes and hilarious memes that target the woke left. The thread wraps up with Musk's straightforward remarks and his knack for asking the real questions.

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

🔥Top 7 FUNNIEST Elon Musk Comebacks 🧵A thread 🧵 1. AOC and her obsession https://t.co/3c1m08hYJr

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

2. Socialist down https://t.co/bUezctvHtO

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

3. Be gentle with girls Elon https://t.co/8pwu01QNJs

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

I highly recommend you follow @ResisttheMS, if you're not already. They report the news that you won't see on the mainstream media. https://t.co/6RGW4gq1wh

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

4. Newsom sucks https://t.co/P3qHD9d9nS

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

5. Poetry https://t.co/LXUqN94t3i

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

Another great account to follow is @CNviolations. He posts brutal community notes and the funniest memes that expose the woke left. https://t.co/r0VHfrZecL

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

6. Simply put https://t.co/PnFTPjRjOg

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

7. Asking the real questions https://t.co/pH5BFAiMlP

Saved - February 14, 2025 at 11:26 AM

@PressSec - Karoline Leavitt

🚨It's a media hoax that President Trump is causing a “constitutional crisis.”   The real crisis is taking place within our judiciary, where activist judges are abusing their power to unilaterally block the President's basic executive authority and thwart the will of the people. https://t.co/YnaL4EmSoV

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a constitutional crisis within our judicial branch. District court judges in liberal districts are abusing their power to block my executive authority. These judges are judicial activists, not honest arbiters. They've issued at least 12 injunctions against my administration in the past two weeks, often without evidence. This is a concerted effort by Democrat activists and a weaponization of justice against me. A reminder to these judges: 77 million Americans elected me. Each injunction abuses the rule of law and thwarts the will of the people. We will comply with the law and the courts, but we'll seek every legal remedy to overturn these radical injunctions and enact my policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch where district court judges and liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block president Trump's basic executive authority. We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law. And they have issued at least 12 injunctions against this administration in the past fourteen days. Often without citing any evidence or grounds for their lawsuits. This is part of a larger concerted effort by democrat activists and nothing more than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against president Trump. Quick news flash to these liberal judges who are supporting their obstructionist efforts. 77,000,000 Americans voted to elect this president, and each injunction is an abuse of the rule of law and an attempt to thwart the will of the people. As the president clearly stated in the Oval Office yesterday, we will comply with the law in the courts, but we will also continue to seek every legal remedy to ultimately overturn these radical injunctions and ensure president Trump's policies can be enacted.
Saved - March 23, 2025 at 3:13 AM

@DoctorCanDo - Dr Trumpenstein

The Deep State Radical Judges Are Now Totally Exposed. Civil War 2 Is The Unelected Deep State Courts Vs. The American Voting Public. Trump is Our Leader @ChanelRion https://t.co/fpJ6FfeA52

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, certain judges are a tool used by Democrats, the ACLU, Marxists, leftists, and the deep state to control America regardless of elections. These judges will allegedly obstruct the president through frivolous lawsuits and unjustified findings. Each judge supposedly claims nationwide power, usurping the power of the presidency. The speaker claims these judges are defending America's "bad guys," helping them steal, pillage, rape, and kill, and freeing those who loot the country, money, liberty, and elections. The speaker believes these judges see themselves as the new presidents, but they have zero power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These judges are the new way that Democrats, the ACLU, the Marxists, the leftists, the deep state intend to keep running America forever, no matter who is president and no matter what you vote. With these judges, Libs will block the president's every move with frivolous lawsuits and unjustified findings and a long tedious process. Each judge can claim he has nationwide power, not just the one out of six hundred and seventy seventh power of his own little district, by usurping the power of the presidency unto themselves. These judges are defending America's bad guys. Look at them. They're helping them steal, pillage, rape, and kill, freeing the thieves and bureaucrats looting your country, your money, your liberty, and your elections. They are the new presidents or so they think. But these judges have zero power to
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 2:06 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

https://t.co/OuvbPJ4A5f

@moment_mirthful - Mirthful Moments

@elonmusk Ignore and impeach the corrupt judges. https://t.co/qHuZrn9iv4

Saved - November 11, 2025 at 7:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe a recurring claim that mainstream opposition is fake, a puppet show for the Elitarian rulers who seek total control. Across posts, I’m told both sides push the same agenda—AI governance, surveillance, vaccines, war—while real issues like Epstein, CDC, and media are hidden. The message: beware the illusion of choice; power remains centralized.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian Masters. As such they keep on fooling the ...: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumia March 2024 explains that deflation is needed because of fake controlled opposition—illusory puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides advancing the same agenda of totalitarian control for their illiterion masters. This structure fooling the people hides the most important truths and pushes the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. The argument continues that without deflating this parasitic system, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and/or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative and the people’s perception. In large-scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. The proposed solution is: “Let’s deflate the parasitic system.” David Ick is cited: “Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives.” The speaker asks, “Are you getting it yet Trump supporters?” and contends, “He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him.” The assertion is that no politician will get us out of this, and “We have to do it.” Catherine Austin Fitz is referenced: “Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US.” The message ends with an instruction to “Please like and follow,” and provides the source: tumia.org.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tumia March 2024. Why deflate? Because of fake controlled opposition. Fake opposition, illiterion puppets pretending to oppose the illiterion puppets on the other side, but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of totalitarian control and for their controlling illiterion masters. As such, they keep on fooling the people, hiding the most important truths and advance more and more the totalitarian control agenda of their illiterion masters. Why deflate? Otherwise, fake, controlled opposition will always be bribed and or blackmailed to effectively keep control of the narrative, the people's perception. So in these large scale systems, there is no real democratic choice and there never will be. What's the solution then? Let's deflate the parasitic system. David Ick, Trump doubles down on support for COVID fake vaccines and boosters despite outcry from conservatives. Are you getting it yet Trump supporters? He was a fraud all along as I have said since 2016 and he has been leading you to glorious failure for the masters that own him. No politician is going to get us out of this. We have to do it. Catherine Austin Fitz, Trump put $10 billion dollars into a program to depopulate The US. Please like and follow. Source, tumia.org.
the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 and 2024 I get in total 41milj excess deaths since the covid gentech "vax" rollout. Adding the 9milj from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 50milj excess deaths (for 5 yrs). By country(47): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The article COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates of extra deaths and serious adverse effects attributable to a three-year period of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The 10/09/2022 estimates report thirty-one million extra deaths and one point nine billion serious adverse effects over three years. Two main differences with the previous estimates (10/01/2022) are: first, eleven countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data, making the current estimate base data consist of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people; second, for estimating serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries listed in the table, with sources from Our World in Data (appendix references). Extra deaths (ED for 2020, ED21 for 2021, and ED22 for 2022) are calculated as the difference between the factual total deaths in the concerned year. Missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected average of the five preceding years (2015 to 2019). The yearly correction factor is 0.75%, calculated from the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries from 2015 to 2019. For 2020 ED the correction factor 0.75% was applied three times (reference year 2017) to the five-year average; for 2021 ED, four times; for 2022 ED, five times. The extra deaths estimates thus reflect excess deaths after correcting for expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. To compute the world totals: for 2020 ED, the ED100 ks extra deaths per 100k people by country are calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100k people, applied to the world population to yield nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021 ED, the ED21M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022 ED, the ED22M doses (extra deaths per million doses) are calculated and aggregated to 763 extra deaths per million doses, applied to global doses to yield nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio of reported adverse effects to reported deaths after COVID vaccination, which is 87.6, derived from a table of estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty-one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years, the text asserts that terms such as bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. It further posits about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, projecting one hundred ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if these trends continue. The text acknowledges that if data are far off target or data are faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. It attributes censorship and a lack of truthful science in mainstream media and tech platforms to propounding that SARS CoV-two is naturally evolved, while claiming truthful science proves SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. It asserts that the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are too large and too numerous, and that these inserts only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically distant. It references a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the needed biochemical technology, including financing, scientific documents, and patents. Specific sources and figures are noted, including Doctor Richard Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-19 is a bioweapon; Doctor Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein; Veritas Revelation Project materials; and claims that the virus comes from a lab. It also mentions Genentech COVID vaccines causing human cells to produce large amounts of toxic spike protein in multiple organs and tissues, and asserts these vaccines are bioweapons with additional components and contaminations causing health damage. The article is attributed to Pak Osmol, dated 10/09/2022, with Appendix A citing Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count as the data source.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID world 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects one point nine billion for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons. The two main differences with the previous estimates on 10/01/2022 are the following: First, 11 countries, for about 600,000,000 people, were added to the estimate base data. As such, the current estimate base data consists of 47 countries for about 2,300,000,000 people. This makes the current estimates more representative for the whole world. Second, for estimating the serious adverse effects the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are taken fully into account as input instead of half in the previous estimates. The extra deaths estimates for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are based on officially reported and factual deaths in the countries mentioned in the table below. For the source of all the used data see the Our World and Data links in the appendix. Extra deaths (see columns twenty twenty ED, twenty twenty one ED, and twenty twenty two ED in the table below) are calculated as the difference of the factual number of total deaths in the concerned year. The missing months of the incomplete 2022 year are estimated by extrapolation of the monthly average of all known months from January 2021 on. The for yearly evolution corrected average of the five preceding years 2015 to 2019. The yearly correction factor used is 0.75% and was calculated based on the evolution of the sum of deaths of all countries below in 2015 to 2019. For the 2020 ED estimate the correction factor 0.75 was three times (reference year twenty seventeen) applied on the five year average, for 2021 ED four times and for 2022 ED five times. In other words, the extra deaths estimates are in fact the excess deaths after correction for an expected yearly evolution and expected yearly without the mass vaccination and COVID bioweapons. Then to calculate the 2020 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED100 ks extra deaths per 100 ks people of the country is calculated. Then this column is aggregated which results in 112 extra deaths per 100 ks people. The latter value is applied on the world population which results into nine million extra deaths in 2020, the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2021 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED21M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in nine sixty one extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into twelve point one million extra deaths in 2021, the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. To calculate the 2022 ED estimate for the world, first the column ED22M doses, extra deaths per million doses given in the country, is calculated. This column is aggregated which results in seven sixty three extra deaths per million doses. The latter value is applied on the world doses which results into nine point six million extra deaths in 2022, the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. Press CTRL plus four more image detail below. The estimate for people with serious adverse effects is calculated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by an estimated ratio reported adverse effectsreported deaths after COVID vaccination. The ratio used is 87.6 and was calculated from the table Estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination for all ages in the article below. This results in an estimated one point one billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and zero point eight billion for 2022. Considering the estimated thirty one million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for three years of deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons the words bioweaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo. Furthermore, there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020. If these extra deaths are continued this will result in one hundred and ten million extra deaths by the end of 2030 from these bioweapons since 2020. For the sake of estimating, certain assumptions about the domain were introduced. If one or some of those assumptions would be far off target, for example as more data becomes available and is integrated in the estimation or some data appears faulty, the current estimates and trends could be seriously unvalidated. Because of the mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms, thus the elites, many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a biolab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes PRRA (HIVGP120) are much too large and too many, and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two, the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore, there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies, years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. See the links below for sources and science. Doctor. Richard M. Fleming, MD, sworn testimony that COVID-nineteen is a bioweapon. Doctor. Richard Fleming on Montanier's discovery of HIV and spiked protein. The virus comes from a lab, appears from the Veritas Revelation Project. Are our scientists lying to us? SARS CoV-two is likely a lab construct. The origin of SARS CoV-two. Since the Genentech COVID vaccines make the human body cells produced during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two, In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness, just cold like symptoms, these Genentech COVID vaccines are of course themselves bioweapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore, not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. See the links below for information about the devastating effects of the COVID vaccine bioweapons. Images, press CTRL plus for more image detail. The article COVID World 10/09/2022, estimated extra deaths thirty one million and estimated serious adverse effects 1,900,000,000 for three years of SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bioweapons was written by Pak Osmol, 10/09/2022. Appendix A Data Source. Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Click the Download tab below the graph on the displayed page. Downloaded CSV September 2022 from Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count. Right click the link and then Save Link As.
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023+half of 2024 I get in total 36mil excess deaths since the covid "vax" rollout. Adding the 9mil from the covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of 44mil (4.5 yrs). By country(47): https://rumble.com/v4g1d6o-estimated-31mil-excess-deaths-1.9bil-adverse-effects-for-3-yrs-of-sars-cov-.html https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Covid%20World%202022-10-09:%203%20Years%20of%20Cov-Vaccine%20Bioweapons:%20Estimated%20Extra%20Deaths%2031M-Adv.%20Eff.%201.9B&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1

Estimated 31mil Excess Deaths+1.9bil Adverse Effects for 3 Yrs of Sars-Cov-2+Vaccine Bioweapons Covid World 2022-10-09: Estimated Extra Deaths 31 Million and Estimated Serious Adverse Effects 1.9 Billion for 3 Years of Covid Killing Protocols, Sars-Cov-2 Virus and Vaccine Bioweapons: https://tum rumble.com
covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 covid world 2022-10-09: 3 years of cov-vaccine bioweapons: estimated extra deaths 31m-adv. eff. 1.9b @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@SteviesQuotes Nep-oppositie is van alle tijden en geen toeval:

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Nep-oppositie: elitaire marionetten die doen alsof ze zich verzetten tegen de elitaire marionetten aan de andere kant ... . Audio-video versie (Engels): https://rumble.com/v575riz-fake-opposition-elitarian-puppets-pretending-to-oppose.html Geschreven versie (Engels): https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Parasitic%20System%202023-12-13:%20Lets%20Deflate%20the%20Parasitic%20System!&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&page=1#tm_fakeopp

the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the parasitic system 2023-12-13: lets deflate the parasitic system! @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

It looks like the whole “MAHA” deal was just a clever cover for bringing in total AI governance into healthcare and FDA oversight… What? You thought that MAHA would be the END of mRNA COVID jabs, and a return to a truly healthier America? THINK AGAIN.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@EtienneJansen - Etienne Jansen

@SecKennedy Why are NRNA and MMR biochemical weapons still used today as we speak?!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The attorney (Speaker 0) opens by expressing frustration that pandemic-era liability protections—the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act—grant broad immunity to the actors involved, effectively shielding them from liability and allowing what he calls “mass murder.” He asks Sacha whether there are obvious legal avenues to sue Pfizer and obtain redress for what he views as illegal acts, given this shield of immunity. Sacha (Speaker 1) replies that neither he nor his colleagues discourage attempts to sue Pfizer due to the fraud allegations they’ve identified. He notes, however, that nobody knows exactly what will break through the immunity barrier, so they should try different approaches. He outlines the current landscape: the defense Pfizer will likely raise is that they did not defraud the government, but merely delivered fraud that the government ordered. He references a concrete example in Brooke Jackson’s case, where Pfizer filed a motion to dismiss in April, arguing the fraud claim centered on delivering government-ordered fraud rather than perpetrating it independently. Sacha emphasizes that while the case may be dismissed, it has not been yet. If a future dismissal occurs, the admission would be valuable, and the goal is to elicit admissions in court. He suggests that they need to prove, by any admissible method, that there was explicit U.S. government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or that certain individuals—Robert Kodlek, Peter Marks, Fauci, and others—were rogue actors acting outside their authority. In other words, the objective is to obtain explicit statements or admissions that could substantiate claims of government-directed action or unauthorized conduct by specific individuals, to challenge the immunity and pursue redress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, I'm gonna let you go, Sacha. But before I do, I'm an attorney. I try to figure out ways to sue people like this. And, you know, the one of the frustrating things during this pandemic is that the PREP Act, the CARE Act, and the 1986 VICA Vaccine Act have all bestowed broad immunity from liability under all of these actors. So they're getting away literally with murder, with AM, with mass murder. They're getting away with it because they have been given this bubble of this shield of immunity from liability. You have an expertise in corporate liability. As a corporate liability officer, do you see any obvious ways where somebody like me can file a lawsuit and get redressed for some of these, illegal acts? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, first of all, neither me nor my colleagues, discourage anyone from doing just that, to just going after Pfizer because of all the fraud that they have committed. I think what the the problem is we're all having, we don't know exactly what's going to crack that that wall, but we have to attempt different ways. Now the yes, we can try going after Pfizer. I'm just saying, you know, here's the lay of the land. This is the the defense they're going to invoke. They already invoked it in Brooke Jackson's case. They're saying we did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered. And that's a even Speaker 0: Which gay oh, in Brooke Jackson. Speaker 1: In Brooke Jackson's in April, they filed motion to dismiss. So and while, you know, the case may be dismissed it hasn't been dismissed. But in let's say in the future, it gets dismissed because because of this. That admission alone is priceless, and we need to elicit these admissions in court. They need to tell us ultimately ultimately through whatever method we're going to to go after. Ultimately, they they need to tell us it's an explicit US government policy to commit mass murder and genocide, or these were rogue actors, these people, Robert Kodlek, Peter Marx, you know, Fauci, whoever. You know, these specific individuals, they were rogue actors and acting outside of their authority. Speaker 0: So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

RFK Jr. knows the COVID death jabs constitute mass murder. He’s called them “mass murder” verbatim. He’s now in a position of authority where he can halt them unilaterally, without any action from FDA. He must stop the “mass murder” Trump started.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MODUSCUNTO - MR. NICE GUY (really trying) - d0xC

@AdameMedia

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

This is a MASSIVE DISTRACTION from the fact that Trump is getting absolutely GRILLED on all sides for teaming up with Palantir to create a database of all Americans. What better way to attempt to get people to stop talking about that, than to share something absolutely fringe and outlandish on his official Truth Social account. People will now forget about the digital prison being constructed for them, chasing mindless rabbit holes about Biden. See how easy that was?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@HighImpactFlix - HighImpactFlix

NEW VIDEO: Trump just handed TOTAL CONTROL over EVERY AMERICAN to a private company.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DrLoupis__ - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

What's going on?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@NightwatchN8 - Nightwatch N8

The two party illusion is the biggest time-waster on the planet

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war, ... . Lets deflate their system and handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Markeer dit. Bewaar dit. Onthoud dit. Kijk er vaak naar. Leer het. Begrijp het. Pak het vast. Geloof het. En vergeet het nooit. Nooit. Dit is de waarheid. De waarheid die voor je verborgen wordt gehouden. De MSM willen nooit dat je de waarheid weet. Ze willen oorlog. En de dood.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that this is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way it is commonly framed. The speaker references 1990, stating that on 02/09/1990 James Baker III told Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not move eastward if Germany unified, and that Gorbachev agreed, ending World War II. The speaker asserts that the US then cheated starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine, marking the rise of the neocons and identifying Clinton as the first agent of this. NATO expansion began in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, at which point Russia did not see a direct threat. The speaker notes the US-led bombing of Serbia in 1999 as problematic, describing it as NATO bombing Belgrade for seventy-eight straight days to break the country apart, which Russia did not like. Putin became president, and the Russians initially tolerated and complained but were largely subdued. The speaker claims Putin started out pro-European and pro-American, even suggesting joining NATO when there was some mutual respect. After 9/11 and the Afghan conflict, Russia supported the effort to root out terror. Two decisive actions are highlighted: in 2002, the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, described as perhaps the most decisive event rarely discussed in this context. This led to the US placing missile systems in Eastern Europe, which Russia views as a direct threat. The speaker mentions a soft regime change operation in Ukraine in 2004-2005, followed by Yanukovych winning the election in 2009 and becoming president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. This calmed tensions because the US was pushing NATO, while Ukrainian public opinion reportedly did not want NATO membership, citing a divided country between ethnic Ukrainians and ethnic Russians and a desire to stay away from certain conflicts. In 02/22/2014, the United States allegedly participated in the overthrow of Yanukovych, described as a typical US regime change operation. The Russians supposedly intercepted a call between Victoria Nuland (then at the State Department, now at Columbia University) and Jeffrey Piot, the US ambassador to Ukraine, discussing who would be in the next government. The speaker asserts that after these events, the US said NATO would enlarge, while Putin repeatedly warned to stop, noting that promises were made not to enlarge NATO. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia are listed as having joined NATO in 2004, before the broader enlargement. The speaker accuses the US of rejecting the basic idea of not expanding NATO to Russia’s border while placing missile systems after breaking a treaty, including walking out of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019. On 12/15/2021, Putin allegedly proposed a draft Russia-US security agreement with no NATO enlargement, which the speaker says he communicated to the White House, urging negotiations to avoid war. The speaker claims Jake Sullivan asserted an open-door policy for NATO enlargement, calling it “bullshit,” and asserts that they refused negotiations, leading to the special military operation, with Zelensky offering neutrality and Western leaders pushing Ukraine to fight, resulting in “600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day. This started in 1990. 02/09/1990, James Baker the third, our secretary of state, said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War two. And, Gorbachev said that's very important. Yes. NATO doesn't move, and we agree to German unification. The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a, basically, a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so called neocons took power, and, Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary, and Czech Republic. At that point, Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Konigsberg, but other than that, there was no direct threat. Then, The US, led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, seventy eight straight days to break the country apart. The Russians didn't like that very much. But Putin became president. They swallowed it. They complained. But, even Putin started out pro European, pro American actually asked, maybe we should join NATO when there was still the idea of some kind of mutually respectful relationship. Then nine eleven came, then came Afghanistan, and the Russians said, yeah, we'll support you. We understand to root out terror. But then came two other decisive actions. In 2002, The United States unilaterally walked out of the anti ballistic missile treaty. This was probably the most decisive event never discussed in this context, But what it did was trigger The US putting in missile systems in Eastern Europe that Russia views as a dire direct threat. In 02/1945, we engaged in a soft regime change operation in Ukraine. But in 2009, Yanukovych won the election, and he became president in 2010 on the basis of neutrality for Ukraine. That calmed things down because The US was pushing NATO, but the people of Ukraine on the opinion polls didn't even wanna be a NATO. They knew that the country is divided between ethnic Ukrainian, ethnic Russian. What do we want with this? We wanna stay away from your problems. So in 02/22/2014, The United States participated actively in the overthrow of Yanukovych, A typical US regime change operation, have no doubt about it. And the Russians did us a favor. They intercepted a really ugly call between Victoria Nuland, my colleague at Columbia University now, between her and, The US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeffrey Piot, who's a senior state department official till today, and they talked about regime change. They said, who's gonna be the next government? All of this is to say, The US then said, okay. Now NATO's really gonna enlarge, and Putin kept saying, stop. You promised no NATO enlargement. It's been, by the way, I forgot to mention in 2004, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovia, Slovakia, Slovenia, seven more countries in the not one inch eastward. And then okay. It's a long story, but The US kept rejecting the basic idea, don't expand NATO to Russia's border in a context where we're putting in goddamn missile systems after breaking a treaty. 2019, we walked out of the intermediate nuclear force treaty. On 12/15/2021, Putin put on the table a draft Russia US security agreement. You can find it online. The basis of it is no NATO enlargement. I called the White House that next week after that, begging them, take the negotiations. Putin's offered something. Avoid this war. Oh, Jeff, there's not gonna be a war. Announce that NATO's not gonna enlarge. Oh, don't worry. NATO's not gonna enlarge. I said, oh, you're gonna have a war over something that's not gonna happen? Why don't you announce them? He said, no. No. Our policy is an open door. This is Jake Sullivan. Our policy is an open door policy. Open door for NATO enlargement. That is under the category of bullshit, by the way. You don't have your right to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world. They turned down the negotiations, then the special military operation started, and five days later, Zelensky says, okay. Okay. Neutrality. And then The United States and Britain said, no way. You guys fight on. We got your back. We don't have your front. You're all gonna die. But we got your back as we kept pushing them into the front lines. That's 600,000 deaths now of Ukrainians since Boris Johnson flew to Kyiv to tell them to be brave.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake opposition of fo actually cooperate to create real sources for division+hate between people. Fe open borders for mass immigration, war,.. . Lets not take their trap solution+handle those real sources with care+love. See parent tweet video+its replies.

@Spiro_Ghost - Spiro

To those calling for the military to be deployed to LA... That is EXACTLY what the ones pulling the strings want! Problem - Reaction - Solution... Don't fall for it!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨‼️🚨BREAKING: THIS FILTHY LYING MURDERER KENNEDY'S FDA JUST APPROVED Merck’s RSV Shot for NEWBORNS -- 12% Of The Newborns Suffered Serious Adverse Events, Including DEATH Let me explain for those unfamiliar with pharmaceutical drug development. A Rate Of >2% SAEs Greater Than Placebo IS A NO GO!!!!! The rate of newborn death from RSV, is listed as 1/28. The SAE/Death rate from this shot is 1/11. Newborns are TWICE as likely to die from the shot as the infection. Results posted at http://ClinicalTrials.gov included serious neurological adverse reactions! Those of you listed here continue to suck his up to Kennedy's butt while he is murdering children FFS!! The murder of American babies must end now!!! @ChildrensHD @MdBreathe @RWMaloneMD @BusyDrT @DrMakaryFDA @SecKennedy @BretWeinstein @maryhollandnyc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

How can @RWMaloneMD vote objectively on vaccine recommendations at @US_FDA when he owns patents and other business interests in vaccines, especially mRNA injections? @wapo @washingtonpost @SecKennedy @NicoleShanahan @realDonaldTrump

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

Let's see how this tweet ages... June 18, 2025: I predict the new Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices ACIP that was recently appointed by @SecKennedy to review vaccines WILL RECOMMEND (aka approve) the Self-Amplifying mRNA shots 👀

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

🚨 ALERT: @SenRandPaul's COVID CRIME AMNESTY AND APOLOGY TOUR HAS BEGUN Like all 535 members, Sen Paul is a walking pus filled corrupted piece of self-enriching traitorous scum who is re-installed over and over by the machine.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

BREAKING: Kennedy’s ACIP vaccine advisory concluded the meeting today with, "mRNA vaccines ARE SAFE" If you don't see the real problem, we'll never find the real solution

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ricwe123 - Richard

The CIA Director smirks and exhales like a man watching his plan fall perfectly into place as Trump rolls out yet another round of weapons for Ukraine. John Ratcliffe’s face says it all,this was the plan all along. The Deep State hasn’t lost an ounce of control, and Trump is just another puppet parroting their agenda. Exactly the kind of predictable move Putin saw coming a mile away.....

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that there are plans to send more weapons to Ukraine, confirming that the country will receive additional arms. The speaker emphasizes that this action is necessary: “We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves.” The speaker asserts that Ukraine is being attacked and hit hard, describing the situation with repetition to underscore the intensity: “They're getting hit very hard now,” followed by “They're getting hit very hard.” The speaker reiterates the need for further weapon deliveries, saying, “We're gonna have to send more weapons.” The emphasis is on defensive capabilities, with a clear indication that the weapons being sent are primarily defensive in nature: “Your defensive weapons primarily.” Throughout, the message conveys that the defense of Ukraine requires continued and increased military support in the form of weapons, due to the heavy blows Ukraine is sustaining.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you planning to send more weapons to Ukraine? We're gonna send some more weapons. We have to. They they have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now. They're getting hit very hard. We're gonna have to send more weapons. Your defensive weapons primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@OwenShroyer1776 - Owen Shroyer

Political Bizarro World

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a perceived flip in the political dynamic around the Epstein files, calling the current moment “political bizarro world.” They observe that on the right, voices now say to move on from the Epstein files, treating it as no big deal, while on the left, voices push for releasing and declassifying the files, with Democrats even attempting to force a floor vote. The speaker notes that during the Trump era, Epstein was a campaign issue, with Trump and several administration members stressing the importance and urgency of releasing the files, and even FBI director Cash Patel reportedly saying it should be the number-one priority. The speaker claims that a majority of Trump voters would have supported releasing the Epstein files on day one, and asserts that this topic was once central to Trump’s political base. In contrast, they point out that in the present moment, the right is urging no action and the left is demanding action, highlighting a stark reversal in public and media positions. Media coverage is described as contradictory to the past: the speaker says CNN and MSNBC are now treating the Epstein files as their biggest story, with Democrats actively calling for declassification and release. They cite Democrats writing songs and posting on social media to advocate for release, suggesting an active and vocal push from the left. A year earlier, the speaker contends, the situation was reversed: right-wing figures demanded the Epstein files, Republican Trump-era officials supported it, and Democrats were largely silent or dismissed the issue as conspiracy theory for involving Bill Clinton. Now, the speaker argues, Democrats are pursuing release while Trump-related figures and right-wing elements retort with resistance or minimal engagement. The speaker uses the juxtaposition to argue that politicians, down to voters, appear highly controlled and capable of swiftly switching sides on the Epstein issue, illustrating broader impressions of partisan manipulation. They suggest broader themes such as “no new wars,” “no new foreign entanglements,” and “no new strikes” as possible contexts for the shifting narratives, alongside reactions to Iran-related actions and Middle East involvement, though they acknowledge these as speculative links. Ultimately, the speaker emphasizes how drastic the shift around the Epstein files feels, labeling it the most political bizarro-world moment and, in their view, a return to “clown world”—now in an inverted, bizarro form.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are now officially in political bizarro world. Now I was gonna post on x about this, but I started to type it out and I realized this is so weird. I can't even really put it into text. So I'll just go ahead and shoot a short video. We are in political bizarro world. What am I talking about? You now have the right wing saying to move on from the Epstein files. Nothing to see here. Forget about it. No big deal. And you have the left wing now talking about the Epstein files, demanding their release, even Democrats trying to take it to a vote on the floor of the house to get them declassified. What? On the campaign, Trump talked about the Epstein files multiple times and releasing them. Multiple members of his administration talked about the importance, the utmost importance of the Epstein files and releasing them. Some, including FBI director Cash Patel, said it should be the number one priority, demanded it be done day one. I would say the majority of Trump voters would have said, yes. Epstein files day one. It was literally a campaign issue. And now a lot of these voices in the Trump world on the right wing are saying move on. Nothing to see here. Meanwhile, I tune in to CNN last night. I tune in to MSNBC last night. And what is their biggest story? The Epstein files. And they're demanding the Epstein files. I've got democrats writing songs and posting them on their social media demanding the Epstein files be released. What? What is going on? A year ago, it was the exact opposite. A year ago, it was right wingers demanding the Epstein files, writing songs, all this stuff, Republicans, Trump now administration members, and the Democrats were silent. Or they would call it a conspiracy theorist because he talked about Bill Clinton on the list. Now you have the Democrats in a full forced effort to try to get the files released, and it's the Trump administration and the right wing stopping it and saying nothing to see here. What in the world? And you know what it really shows? It shows how controlled both sides are from from the politicians all the way down to the constituents, to the voters, to the people. It shows how everything is controlled, that just like that, all of a sudden, people just change sides. So we went from the right being give us the Epstein files to now the left being give us the Epstein files. And, you know, there's a couple different issues you could say maybe tie into this bizarro world like no new wars, no new foreign entanglements, no new strikes, and then the Iran strikes and and more involvement in the Middle East and Trump people kind of trying to make excuses or switch for that. But that's just I don't know. You could even say maybe that's politics is normal. There has been nothing more political bizarro world than the switch on the Epstein files. It is shocking. Now let me just say this. If this had happened a year ago when Biden was in the White House and the Democrats had the Senate and the Democrats had the House and Biden said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's FBI said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and Biden's attorney general said, we're not gonna do the Epstein files, and then Republicans tried to get a vote to declassify the Epstein files and the Democrats shut it down, what would you be saying as a Trump voter? What would you be saying as a right winger? What would you be saying as a conservative? Don't tell me you wouldn't be outraged. Don't tell me you wouldn't say Joe Biden was covering it up. Don't tell me you wouldn't be screaming how the Democrats are covering up sex trafficking. Of course, you would. But, oh, because it's Trump and the Republicans, now you're okay with it. And if you're already making excuses as to why you're okay with it now or, oh, it's Trump and not Biden, then yet again, it shows how we're in political bizarro world and it shows how easily controlled both sides of the political aisle are. Clown world. I thought we left clown world. We're right back in it, Except now it's bizarro form.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@NoLieWithBTC - No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen

There it is. Republicans just BLOCKED the release of the Epstein Files.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The amendment was put to a vote. Those in favor signified by saying aye; those opposed say no. The chair ruled the noes have it, and the amendment is not agreed to. A roll call was requested. The roll call results were: - Missus Fishbach: No - Mister Norman: Yes - Mister Roy: No - Missus Houchin: No - Mister Langworthy: No - Mister Scott: No - Mister Griffith: No - Mister Jack: No - Mister McGovern: Aye - Miss Gantlin: Aye - Mister Nugoose: Aye - Miss Ledger Fernandez: Aye - Madam chair: No The clerk reported the total as 5 yeas and 7 nays. The amendment remains not agreed to. The chair indicated that what’s appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hearing none, the questions on the amendment. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Those opposed say no. No. No. In the opinion chair, the noes have it. The amendment is not agreed. Speaker 1: I'm kinda shocked by that. I will ask for a roll call. Speaker 0: The clerk will call the roll. Speaker 1: Missus Fishbach? No. Missus Fishbach, no. Mister Norman? Yeah. Mister Norman, I. Mister Roy, missus Houchin? No. Missus Houchin? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Langworthy? No. Mister Scott? Mister Scott, no. Mister Griffith? Mister Griffith? No. Mister Jack? No. Mister Jack, no. Mister McGovern? Aye. Mister McGovern, aye. Miss Gantlin? Yes. Miss Gantlin, aye. Mister Nugoose? Yes. Mister Nugoose, aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez? Aye. Miss Ledger Fernandez, aye. Madam chair? No. Madam chair, no. The clerk will report the total. 5 yeas, seven a's. Speaker 0: The noes have it. The amendment is not agreed to. And I think most of us believe what's appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it. Speaker 1: Well, madam Speaker 0: Thank you.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@deSunShineBand - CS

Zou ‘t waar zijn?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Due to this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She’s always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life’s goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you’re looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta’s image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because of this villa worth over $20,000,000, no one believes Greta Thunberg anymore. She's always publicly claimed that living modestly was her life's goal, insisting that she rejected luxury in order to remain true to her message. But recently, journalists uncovered that this stunning villa you're looking at now is actually registered in her name. Rumors quickly circulated that a wealthy Hollywood activist had gifted the property to Greta, but many remained doubtful. Critics argue that the funds may have come from the humanitarian campaigns she personally organized in countries around the raising serious questions about transparency. The revelation has sparked intense debate with many feeling betrayed and questioning whether Greta's image of simplicity and sacrifice was ever real. Whether the villa was truly a gift or not, the controversy has left lasting stain on her reputation, making people wonder if her carefully built persona was just an illusion.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change https://www.bitchute.com/video/sVvOHRofonXi Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

From Satire To Reality - False Green Agenda & Climate Change Do it for grandma and the children... bitchute.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/rndgGtZ31Y Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@truthstreamnews - Truthstream Media

MAHA Action just deleted this new video of RFK Jr. talking about how they're developing a new universal vaccine at NIH for corona and flu which is "gonna be a much safer and more effective vaccine". Hazard a guess on why they'd do that? https://t.co/nClS18k2hS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NIH is developing a universal vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. This vaccine mimics natural immunity and is effective against any kind of mutation. It doesn't drive the virus to mutate. The researchers believe it could be effective not only against coronaviruses but also against influenza. The vaccine is described as much safer and much more effective. The exchange then notes that Mark, did you take your question again? and Mark is prompted to ask his question.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you take your question again? Now we're developing a universal vaccine at NIH, which is a vaccine that addresses the entire phylum of viruses. And so it's a it's a vaccine that mimics natural immunity, and it and it it is effective against any kind of mutation. So it doesn't drive the virus to mutate, and it could be effective. We believe it's gonna be effective about against not only coronaviruses, but also flu. And it's gonna be a much more much safer and much more effective vaccine. Mark, did you have your question?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/LwMuuuhYWA Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Insight into why Israel has a leash on Trump (IMO) "In the early '90s...Trump... declares bankruptcy... he's bailed out by Wilbur Ross... representing the Rothschild banking interests... the Rothschild family has a very long... history with Zionism and... the State of Israel." This clip of Whitney Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Kim Iversen (@KimIversenShow) posted to Rumble on August 6, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "And then in the early '90s, Trump's Atlantic City holdings, and other things, dragged down his business empire. And he declares bankruptcy, and in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president, the first time making him Commerce Secretary. "But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interest, specifically this Wall Street M and A arm that they opened up in the '80s was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. "So basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it wasn't for the, Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people and sort of, the Epstein network, and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jimmy Goldsmith, also backed by the Rothschilds, and even George Soros, whose first, his Quantum Fund in, like, the late '60s was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interests. "And for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the State of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now, since he owes them a lot."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1990s, Trump’s Atlantic City Holdings and other ventures dragged down his business empire, leading to bankruptcy. To secure a bailout, he was aided by Wilbur Ross, who later became commerce secretary under Trump. At that time, Wilbur Ross represented the Rothschild banking interests. The Rothschilds, specifically the Wall Street mergers and acquisitions arm they opened in the 1980s, were responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. The narrative asserts that Trump, as a business icon, would not have existed beyond the early 1990s if it weren’t for the Rothschild banking interests, which are described as having extensive affiliations with people in the Epstein network. The transcript links Epstein’s financial crimes to currency speculation described by the New York Times as a “currency speculation cabal,” and names individuals such as Jamie Goldsmith as being backed by the Rothschilds, as well as George Soros, whose Quantum Fund in the late 1960s was bankrolled by French Rothschild interests. The account emphasizes a long and storied history between the Rothschild family and Zionism, including the establishment of the state of Israel, and portrays the Rothschilds as major patrons of that cause. It concludes by suggesting that the Rothschilds have had substantial influence over Trump, asserting that Trump owes them a great deal. Overall, the narrative draws a chain of connections: the Rothschild banking interests’ influence helped shape Trump’s rise and persistence as a prominent business figure, with Wilbur Ross’s bailout role in the 1990s serving as a pivotal link, and various high-profile financial networks—Epstein-related cohorts, currency speculation participants, and financiers like Jamie Goldsmith and George Soros—being connected to Rothschilds. It also foregrounds the Rothschilds’ historical ties to Zionism and the establishment of Israel as part of their influence, asserting that these relationships have translated into ongoing sway over Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then in the early nineties, Trump's Atlantic City Holdings, and other things dragged down his business empire, and he declares bankruptcy. And in order to be bailed out, he's bailed out by, Wilbur Ross, who he later rewards for that when he's president. The first time making him commerce secretary. But at the time, Wilbur Ross was representing the Rothschild banking interests. And the Rothschild banking interests, specifically this Wall Street m and a arm that they opened up in the eighties, was responsible for bringing Robert Maxwell to New York. So, basically, you know, Trump as a business icon would not have existed beyond the night early nineteen nineties if it wasn't for, the Rothschild banking interests, who have a lot of affiliations to people in sort of, the Epstein network and specifically Epstein's financial crimes, which include a lot of currency speculation in this, what the New York Times once called a currency speculation cabal, including people like Jamie Goldsmith also backed by the Rothschilds and even George Soros whose first, his quantum fund in, like, the late sixties was bankrolled by the French Rothschild interest. And if for anyone that's familiar, the Rothschild family has a very, long and storied history with Zionism and the establishment of the state of Israel and and being a major patron of that. So, you know, they've definitely had a lot of influence, I would think, over, Trump now since he owes them a lot. And also

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/VeHAF1Ik18 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@DollarVigilante - The Dollar Vigilante

One of the most obvious CIA assets in the limelight. #TuckerCarlson https://t.co/gp5HTZhVbv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Several speakers discuss the idea that Tucker Carlson is a CIA asset. Speaker 0 argues that Carlson “is clearly a CIA asset,” noting that you don’t rise to a global audience and make money from edgy content unless you’re “in the big club.” They point to a supposed inconsistency: Carlson recently said he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025, yet, “here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA.” They state Carlson “said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA.” Speaker 1 adds personal details, saying, “when I applied to CIA, and I’ve taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you’re from a CIA family.” They acknowledge that “my father worked in conjunction with CIA,” and that they tried to join the CIA but were not being false about it, and that “he’s attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever.” They claim, “Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it.” Speaker 0 amplifies the claim by referencing Tucker Carlson with “an ex CIA agent” who says to Carlson, “you’re a lot more on the inside than me.” They find it interesting that Carlson “is like a ex CIA agent. He’s saying Tucker Carlson’s more on the inside than he is.” They encourage listeners to pay attention to Tucker’s response, saying, “listen to Tucker’s response and I want you to pay attention this because it’s in these moments that you actually can see what’s actually going on.” Speaker 2 briefly interjects with uncertainty about deals that took place, and Speaker 1 comments that they have “not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1.” Speaker 2 says, “Well, I mean, if you’re allowed me more on the inside than I am.” Speaker 1 denies, saying, “No. No. No. I’m just a I’m just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don’t, you know.” The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking, “Did you kinda see what happened there?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think people are actually starting to catch on to what I've been saying for a long time. I've been saying this for years. Tucker Carlson is clearly a CIA asset. You don't get into Fox and, then get out and get, like, this audience of, like, the entire world and say things that are, you know, a little bit edgy and make tons of money unless you're in the big club. And it's actually starting to come out now. Like, he recently said that, he was shocked to discover his dad was in the CIA upon his death in March 2025. But here he is in June 2024, like a year earlier, admitting his father was CIA. So he said he only found out in 2025 after his father died, but here he is in 2024 saying he knew his dad was CIA. Speaker 1: And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap including from Putin, like, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. And he's attacking my dad because the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies and I learn actually, yeah, you know, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. Speaker 0: Like here's Tucker Carlson with an ex CIA agent and the CIA agent says to him, you're a lot more on the inside than me. That's interesting. Like, he's like a ex CIA agent. He's saying Tucker Carlson's more on the inside than he is. Listen to Tucker's response and I want you to pay attention this because it's in these moments that you actually can see what's actually going on. Speaker 2: Like, just get done also with the deals that just happened over there, or was this earlier? I don't you would probably know. Speaker 1: No. I don't know. You don't? I've not made $1 in The Middle East, not 1. Speaker 2: Well, I mean I mean, if you're allowed me more on the inside than I am. Speaker 1: And No. No. No. I'm just a I'm just a visitor and a traveler and a watcher, but I don't, you know. Speaker 0: Did you kinda see what happened there?

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/KmYhsJKABW Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@flatsmackin - DemonstrableReality

Think about the fact that the masses believed this and still do. 😳 https://t.co/Zs9VEa6u4G

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/9zUcgRbvNg Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@realstewpeters - Stew Peters

Trump just authorized FOUR NEW COVID VACCINES. https://t.co/zfLl0JZsUg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The question asked whether the president believes the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. The response notes that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously approving four new COVID-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas. The revocation is described as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the public health emergency being over. To correct the record, it is stated that the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. The administration says, “We believe in individual choice,” a promise the president and the secretary have made and delivered on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From miscommunications or differences on vaccine policy. So I wonder if you could just say whether or not the president believes that the COVID vaccine should be available to and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and preexisting conditions. What I will tell you is that the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three COVID vaccinations while simultaneously green lighting four new COVID nineteen vaccines with twenty twenty five and twenty twenty six formulas. The the reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because obviously the COVID pandemic and the public health emergency is over. But just to correct the record because there's been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA's decision does not affect the availability of COVID vaccines for Americans who want them. We believe in individual choice. That's a promise both the president and the secretary have made, and it's a promise they have now delivered on.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gDeAS03UKD Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SemperVeritasX - John-Paul Berg

Pierre Poilievre is not a nationalist. He isn't even a conservative. The guy is a controlled opposition, uniparty globalist. They're all in on it together. The entirety of our politics is an elaborate performative charade to provide the illusion of participatory governance to the peasantry. This has never been more evident. Every day I wonder when you people will notice.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/7Z7bVBlQjG Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@PatteeuwJens - Jens Patteeuw

Just a few days ago, Bill Gates met with Trump at the White House. This is the second time they have met; at the beginning of the year, they had a dinner. Gates said then that he was "impressed" with Trump’s interest in global health at that time. For all those who somehow hoped that Gates would be arrested or that Trump would do it, just forget it. It's not gonna happen, at all. This recent meeting happened around the same time Karoline Leavitt, the White House Press Secretary, announced there would be four new covid vaccines. Also, earlier this week, Trump again reiterated that Operation Warp Speed (the COVID-19 vaccines) was a huge success. There's a lot more than meets the eye. We can't forget that Bill Gates publicly endorsed JD Vance's book "Hillbilly Elegy" on his own blog in 2017. So he was already promoting JD Vance before he became "famous". JD Vance is sponsored by globalist and Bilderberg member Peter Thiel. In light of the recent statements of JD Vance, saying that he "is ready to take over", if "God forbid something terrible would happen", this is all very peculiar. #Trump #BillGates #news

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/Ged4Fu9cXF Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ShannonJoyRadio - Shannon Joy

Don't fall for this scam @liz_churchill10 Trump is NOT going to war with PHARMA, he's HELPING them by providing a reason to eliminate ALL the 'old vaccines' because of thimerosal. Trump, RFK & Bhattacharya have been heavily promoting 'operation warp speed tactics' to develop new, universal mRNA and sa-mRNA shots for PHARMA to replace traditional vaccines. This is NOT Trump waking up, or doing the right thing, or launching a 'war against vaccines' ... this is a MARKETING CAMPAIGN for the new mRNA technology. And they WILL MANDATE these. DO NOT FALL FOR THIS!

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Oh. My. God. President Trump calls out the VACCINE TERRORISTS…https://t.co/dJLDTn9xbX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 shows a metal container described as a “thimerosal bomb,” noting they keep it because they are a little afraid of it, and it is a very fine powder. Speaker 2 states that thimerosal is labeled very toxic and has cumulative effects, capable of causing damage to the kidneys, respiratory system, skin, and nervous system. It specifically warns of reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. They emphasize that this is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0 notes that thimerosal is present in a vaccine. Speaker 2 explains that thimerosal is used in a whole range of products, with vaccines being a major example because it is directly injected. They reference the tetanus vaccine, noting a vial that expires and contains thimerosal as a preservative. They claim that thimerosal has been a big exposure issue in the United States, especially with the influenza vaccine, which is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, and all children on a yearly basis. Speaker 1 adds a point about how thimerosal is added: it is not something added at the end after production but is incorporated because the factory is not clean and not sterile. They argue that either there must be an expensive sterile factory that does not need thimerosal or one that produces thimerosal, and that thimerosal would need to be used throughout production. They assert that the use of thimerosal needs to be stopped. Speaker 2 identifies the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, “their flu zone,” and states that it contains twenty-five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1 discusses personal experience, noting that many people did not know about thimerosal. They reveal they have given 2,000 RhoGAM shots and have been in vaccines for thirty-five years, and they did not know that RhoGAM contained thimerosal. They suggest that many doctors were unaware that the term “thimerosal” referred to mercury.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Show them the thimerosal bomb, which we keep in a metal container because we're a Speaker 1: little afraid of it, and it's a very fine powder. Speaker 2: This is this is thimerosal, which is labeled very toxic. Has cumulative effects, can cause damage to the kidneys, to the respiratory system, skin, to the nervous system. Specifically warns on here that it can cause reproductive and developmental toxicity, meaning that it can cause things like autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. This is immensely toxic stuff. Speaker 0: And it's a vaccine. Speaker 2: And this is what's in the vaccine. It's important to to realize we're talking about a whole range of products. Vaccines are a big one because, of course, you're directly injecting it. For example, this is tetanus vaccine. This one expires. It's a lot dated now in 02/2007. Here's the thimerosal. 1 to October is a preservative. Perhaps the the biggest one in The US, at least, that's ex for exposure to mercury is the influenza Influenza vaccine is now recommended for all pregnant women, all infants, all children on a yearly basis. You're supposed to Speaker 1: You have last year's influenza? Understand that Thimerosal is not added at the end. It's not like, well, that factory next year can make Thimerosal free. Thimerosal, you either have to have a thimerosal free factory or you have to not have one. They add thimerosal at each step because the factory is not clean and not sterile. So you either have to have an expensive sterile factory where you don't need thimerosal or you have to have one that produces thimerosal. It's gonna need thimerosal or something the whole time. It needs to be stopped. Speaker 2: This is, the influenza vaccine from Adventist Pasture, their flu zone. Thimerosal, twenty five micrograms of mercury per dose. Speaker 1: I'd like to point out that a lot of people didn't know, and and I'm one of Speaker 2: them. Speaker 1: I've given 2,000 RhoGAM shots. I've been in vaccines for thirty five years. I didn't know that RhoGAM had Thimerosal in it. So I think a lot of the doctors were unaware. They weren't aware that even the word Thimerosal meant mercury.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/ilrV1mCNCT Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@JuanGutiCA714 - Juan Hodl

Alex Krainer explains who is at the top of the “globalist network”: These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law… like a mafia. In everything I’ve read it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as the people who seemingly wield the most power. https://t.co/emySyfd1uK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the network is a meta tribe of oligarchs centered in a history starting with Cecil Rhodes, who envisioned a world controlled by the elite. He says Rhodes handed the vision to Milner and the Milner group, describing Milner as “my blood brother” and noting that Milner was committed. The network expanded from a Crown/London core to encompass Wall Street, the American Deep State, and major banking families named in Tragedy and Hope. He defines the network as a broad, elite circle and notes there isn’t a single top person. Speaker 1 references Tragedy and Hope and Carrol Quigley, along with Guido Preparata’s Conjuring Hitler, as key to understanding what happened in 1938. He asserts that Quigley gave readers the keys in a long but detailed work, suggesting that the powers of financial capitalism sought “to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” with the growth of financial capitalism enabling a decentralization of world economic control and benefiting financiers while harming other economic groups. He connects this to Russia in the 1990s, arguing that oligarchs like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and others were not merely reform-minded tycoons but “handpicked trustees” serving foreign financial interests, with figures such as George Soros and Edmund Safra involved. Speaker 1 adds that, despite a claim there’s no top, there must be one at the top since these are networks of power operating outside the rule of law, like a mafia. He contends Rothschilds are often the top-wielding group, with others subordinated to them, and that civil wars can erupt among these bankers when crises arise. He suggests American bankers may be challenging British bankers for ascendancy, implying a current (unspecified) civil conflict within the network. He acknowledges the difficulty of knowing what happens behind closed walls and notes the top dog concept exists: “there must be a top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system… there'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There’s always going to be a top dog.” Speaker 0 agrees with the “lead dog” principle and adds that there are multiple major families or clans, each with its own leadership. He emphasizes a “family element” to the network, referencing “pancake” or mafioso-style families, and remarks that this discussion provides a concise, one-stop shop for understanding the topic. Speaker 0 then signals a transition to the next point with enthusiasm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the network, Alex, broadly who are the network? Because it's clear from tragedy and hope, I'd say is the most accurate around. It kind of starts mainly in the modern times with, Cecil Rhodes who had the vision, right, to have a world completely controlled by the elite. No conspiracy theory, it's all documented. And then he handed over to Milner and the Milner group, and he said Milner basically, he said, is my blood brother. He fully entrusted him with the vision. Mildner was committed. And then you have this whole crown kind of city of London, UK, powerful network that eventually became a network that encompassed Wall Street and the American Deep State, if you want to call it, and of course all the great banking families, many of them named in tragedy and hope. Is getting towards like, what the network is? It's a meta tribe of oligarchs. And that's why it's kinda hard to to get right to the guy at the top. There isn't really a guy at the top. It's all of what I said and more. Yeah? Speaker 1: Yes. Look. I I read Tragedy and Hope, and I read it very carefully. And in fact, this whole story about appeasement, I reconstructed it from Carole Quigley. And with some subsequent research by the guy who wrote conjuring Hitler. That's that's a masterpiece. His name is Guido Antonio Preparata. Okay? And that book is not as not as long, but it's it's it's, like, dense. It's, like, completely fluffy, and it, like, blows your mind. So from those two books, I reconstructed the what actually happened in 1938 in in Munich. Anyway so, basically, Carroll Quigley, I believe that he gave us the keys. He just couldn't come out exactly and give it away because it would be too you know, the it would have been spotted straight away. So he put it in a into a book that's, like, thirteen, four 1,400 pages long, and then you have to read it very carefully, but it's a lot is there. A lot is there. And I will I will read to you. I have this in front of me the maybe the key quote, which which tells you what we're up against. And the one so this is this is the key quote from Carroll Quigley. I think many people are already familiar by this, but he says that the powers of financial capitalism had a far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands, to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a decentralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and direct injury of all other economic groups. And so this quote, when you take when you keep that in mind and you look at what happened in Russia in the nineteen nineties, it's it's exactly what happened. And then you you also find out that these people like Mikhail Khodorkovsky and these other oligarchs, that they were not just, you know, Russian tycoons who emerged because they were very capable and, you know, aggressive young reformers as they were presented in the media in the West. They were handpicked trustees who were serving the needs of the foreign financial interests. And so Mikhail Khodorkovsky was a trustee for Jacob Rothschild's interests in Russia. George Soros was there, involved very prominently. Edmund Safra, and and a numb a a number of a number of high profile western bankers. But, you know, when you say that there's nobody at the top, I think that there's somebody at the top necessarily because, you know, this is you know, these are these are networks of power, and you're right to call it a network. These are networks of power that operate outside of the rule of law. So they're not bound by lawful institutions. This is like law of the jungle. It it functions like a like a mafia like a mafia business, like a mafia organization, which means that somebody necessarily has to be at the top to enforce the order. You know, you can't have democracy at at that level. So in in everything that I've read so far, it always emerges that this name Rothschild comes up as as the people who seemingly wield the most power, and then everybody else is kind of in a in a subordinate position to them. And I think that when things are going well, they they get along, and they work as a club. And, you know, I'm in charge, but you have your own suzerainty there, and you have your own you know, you dominate your own. But when things get difficult, when the system comes to a crisis, then you see that you might have civil wars there between these bankers. And I think that we're living in a period when these civil wars are erupting again. And it seems to me that the American bankers feel that they no longer have to be subordinated to the to the British bankers. And I think that part of what we see today might be that civil war. Of course, we don't know anything about this. We can just look at where smoke you know, which orifice produces the smoke, and then we can just try to kind of wonder what what actually happened behind the the closed walls. But Yeah. You know, there must be there must be top of the hierarchy because, otherwise the whole system you know, it'd be like you have a pack of dogs. There's always going to be a top dog. And if there isn't a top dog, the other dogs are going to fight to the death until one emerges as the top dog, and then they'll be at peace. Speaker 0: Yeah. And that's the lead dog kind of principle. Absolutely. You know, a slight variant on that to allow for not one kingpin to your mafia analogy, there's a bunch of major families and each of them sure has the dawn. But maybe there isn't a single one, but there's certainly a cluster of key lead dogs. And the beautiful elegance of that is because we're talking about families, right? Pancake families, Baffia families. There's a family element to it. And you know, I was going to my next bullet point. This is fantastic, Alex. This is a one stop shop for Speaker 1: everyone Speaker 0: to know.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/sHrMmZdmZ4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@MareQay - Mare Qay

Dang, wonder how many at the time were paying attention https://t.co/OgKK62YlUC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses that they wanted to meet face to face to get admission of what “they” were doing. Speaker 1 identifies “they” as someone in the office of the Trilateral Commission. Speaker 0 asks what the Trilateral Commission is. Speaker 1 explains that it is “an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations.” Speaker 0 counters that this is what they’d like people to believe, but claims that “what they’re really up to is a scheme to plant their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots.” Speaker 0 asks if they’re pressing charges; agrees that a globe was broken and UNICEF artwork damaged, and adds that “they’re in on it too.” Speaker 0 asks for a Mister Klein, who replies that he has documented evidence and “the magazines here” are Conspiracy Review and Suppressed Truth Roundup, asserting that “the whole master plan is exposed.” Speaker 0 notes that Klein remains unconvinced and asks if he’d like to hear a few names of people who have been on the Trilateral Commission. Klein is not particularly enthusiastic. Speaker 1 lists names: James O’Carter (likely a misreference or fictionalized name), Henry Kissinger, Walter Mondale, and Mister Klein, then John Anderson, George Bush. Speaker 0 recalls the convention where it seemed Ford would be the VP candidate, but says David Rockefeller “just picked up a phone, put in a call,” saying, “Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It’s George. Bye.” He concludes that “no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House.” Speaker 0 asks if they are through. The response is implied as yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I just wanted to meet them face to face. I I wanted them to admit what they were doing. Who is they? Speaker 1: He was in the office of the trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Trilateral commission? Speaker 1: Yeah. The trilateral commission. Speaker 0: Alright. What is the trilateral commission? Speaker 1: It's an organization founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller to bring together business and political leaders from The United States, Europe, Japan so they could work together for better economic and political cooperation between their nations. Speaker 0: Well, that that's what they'd like us to believe. But you see, Speaker 2: what they're really up to is a scheme to plant Speaker 0: their own loyal members in positions of power in this country to work to erase national boundaries and create an international community, and in time, bring about a one world government with David Rockefeller calling the shots. I take it they're pressing charges? Yeah. Well, I I he broke a globe and and some UNICEF artwork. Well, they're they're in on it too. Okay, mister Klein. I'm just telling you our whole way of life as we know it is in jeopardy. I appreciate that information. But I I I have I have the documented evidence. It's all in there. Show him. Well, he's got got these magazines here. Conspiracy review, Suppressed truth roundup? The whole master plan is exposed. Yeah. Well, You're still not convinced. Would would you like to hear the names of just a few of the people who have been on the trilateral commission? Not particularly. James O'Carter. Heard of him? Look, mister Klein Henry Kissinger. You heard of him? Walter Mondale. Who? Mister Klein, this is John Anderson, George Bush. Now you remember at the at the convention, everybody thought it was gonna be Ford for Veep. You know what happened? David Rockefeller just picked up a phone, put in a call. Hey, Ronnie. Forget Jerry. It's George. Bye. So no matter who won in November, they had their man in the White House. Are you through? Yeah.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/gVAqsDDlpV Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@SapperWarrior - 100% MAGA, BUT FUCK TRUMP 🇷🇺 🇺🇸 🇷🇺 🇺🇸

Trump, who has turned into the biggest neocon in presidential history, just did more to validate and help the globalist swamp warmongers than any Democrat or RINO could’ve ever hoped for. After campaigning for and voting for Trump in every election, I feel furiously betrayed 😡 https://t.co/2puCajgELc

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/bgtuPShdt4 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@ITMTrading - ITM Trading

Charlie Kirk Assassination Fuels Elite’s Reset Plan for Great Depression 2.0 - Ed Dowd Watch now: https://youtu.be/kSCyKHsTBAo #finance #money #dollar #usd #gold @DanielaCambone @DowdEdward https://t.co/e1Ok9JWuXs

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/URjsmXXTUQ Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@AllenDMartin - Allen Martin

Pfizer murdered my 18 yo daughter! mRNA batch fn2908. Nov 9,2022. @Potus just awarded @pfizer a 70 BILLION CONTRACT ... to murder more people! The man standing beside him today, shook my hand and promised to make them pay, less than a year ago. Here I am, STILL TRYING TO PAY OFF HER FUNERAL!!!! I don't need 70 billion, I only need about $4,000 so she can have a fucking headstone!!!! THEY MURDERED HER AND NOW THEY'RE "LEADERS" AND "GREAT PEOPLE"!?! FUCK YOU! THE GASLIGHTING IS TOO MUCH! I CAN'T FUCKING TAKE IT ANYMORE!

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/5yCbPoG5Pw Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Before the election: ‘We’ll release the Epstein files.’ After the election: They protect the pedophiles. Before the election: ‘We’ll end the wars.’ After the election: They fund genocide. Before the election: ‘We’ll go after COVID crimes.’ After the election: They hand $70 billion to Pfizer. I can’t stomach it anymore. This administration is a disgrace.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/WPEE8N9FNB Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@Alec_Zeck - D. Alec Zeck

I think I’m at the point where I just appreciate the comedic absurdity of it all. Some people genuinely believe Trump is a freedom fighter, secretly leading a military operation to take down the deep state. Others believe he’s the literal embodiment of evil and the sole cause of all modern problems. And then there are those who still believe that voting matters and that legitimate, lasting solutions are going to come from politics. At this point, it’s like watching different cults argue over which illusion is more real and it’s hilarious (and sometimes disturbing).

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

https://t.co/GOf5RzPXM5 Fake Opposition: Elitarian Puppets Pretending to Oppose the Elitarian Puppets on the other side but in fact both sides acting for the same agenda of Totalitarian Control and for their Controlling Elitarian ... . See parent tweet video and its replies.

@davidicke - David Icke

This is what I have said for years about the hard sell and soft sell of AI dystopia. People like Gates and Schwab have gone for the hard sell and for the sceptics Musk goes for the soft sell. The outcome in BOTH cases? Human-AI fusion - we think what AI tells us to think - and total human AI/digital enslavement. It's a pincer movement by two cheeks on the same backside - Gates and Schwab are cast as the pantomime villains while Musk plays the good guy who cares and only wants the best for you. Pure theatre. See my new book The Road Map in which I take the pantomime apart.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸 ELON: xAI WAS BUILT TO LOVE HUMANITY “I created xAI to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking, that aspirationally loves humanity and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.” Elon described the mission as building AI that helps, but doesn’t replace https://t.co/wngEPrL9jF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really want to have a maximally truth seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, which is to to have an AI that is maximally truth seeking, that aspirationally does love humanity, and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 12:23 PM

@IrishKat00 - Irish Kat❤️

Wow listen to this former litigation lawyer and the original intent of the constitution. https://t.co/ojQNCicE3E

Video Transcript AI Summary
Publius Hulda, a retired litigation attorney who writes on the original intent of the Constitution using the Federalist Papers, argues that the Supreme Court has ignored the Federalist Papers and the framers’ Constitution for two centuries. He contends the attorney general’s opinion raises questions but fails to cite article, section, and verse where Congress is authorized to restrict arms, asserting that when the Constitution was ratified, the federal government’s powers were enumerated and that there was no delegation of authority to restrict the people’s arms. Hulda emphasizes that Article I, Section 8 lists powers delegated to Congress for the national government, but he asserts that the framers did not grant Congress the power to restrict arms. He cites Federalist Paper No. 46 by James Madison to support the claim that the American people are armed so they can defend themselves, their communities, and their states from a potentially tyrannical federal government that oversteps constitutional limits. He cites specific constitutional text: Article I, Section 8, Clause 16, and notes that Congress passed the Militia Act of 1792, requiring every able-bodied male citizen aged 18 to 46 (excluding federal officers and employees) to buy a rifle, ammunition, and report to local militia training. He also references Article I, Section 8, Clause 11, which he says authorizes letters of marque and reprisal, enabling privateers who conducted private warfare during conflicts such as the War of 1812. Hulda asserts that the framers contemplated a heavily armed people and that the federal government was never authorized to restrict arms in any fashion. He claims that attempts to restrict arms represent usurpation of powers not possessed by the federal government. He criticizes the Attorney General for basing arguments on court opinions rather than the Constitution, arguing there is a vast gulf between the two. He references that there are 200 years’ worth of Supreme Court opinions and quotes Charles Evans Hughes saying that the Constitution means what the judges say it means, labeling this prevailing dogma as a lie and arguing it has led to a federal government no longer constrained by constitutional chains. Hulda contends that the oath of office requires obedience to the Constitution, not to the Supreme Court, which he views as a creature of the Constitution and fully subject to its terms. He counters the AG’s claim that the Supreme Court is the exclusive and final authority on federal powers by noting that the framers anticipated corruption and lawlessness among judges. Therefore, Congress, the President, and the states possess checks on the Supreme Court. He cites Federalist No. 81, where Hamilton describes impeachment and removal as checks on lawless judges, and asserts the President’s oath is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution, not to obey the Supreme Court. He references Madison’s Virginia Resolutions, which state that states, as the sovereign parties to the Constitution, are the final authority on whether the federal government has violated the Constitution and may check all three branches, including the judiciary, by nullifying their acts if necessary. He notes he did not finish his argument and hopes to discuss the so-called nullification crisis of 1832 during questions. Speaker 0 thanks him for his comments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got five minutes. If you would, please make sure your green light is on, and then state your name and title for the record. Thank you. Speaker 1: It is on. My name is Publius Hulda. I'm a retired litigation attorney, and I write on the original intent of the constitution using the Federalist Papers. I do not go by supreme court opinions because for two hundred years, the supreme court has been ignoring the Federalist Papers and the constitution our framers given, and they have gone off on tangents of their own which have nothing to do with the constitution. The attorney general's opinion begs the question. He states that states can't nullify acts of the federal government which are authorized by constitution. But then he completely fails to cite article section and verse, a clause where the constitution delegates to congress authority to restrict our arms. When we ratified the constitution, we created the federal government. We listed, enumerated every power we granted to our creature, the federal government. Article one, section eight, clauses one through 16 lists most of the powers we delegated to congress for the government for for the country at large. We didn't put on our list that our creature could restrict our arms. We didn't delegate this power to congress because our framers wanted the American people to be heavily armed. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison write about this in the Federalist Papers. In Federalist Paper number 46, James Madison writes why the American people are armed. It is so we can defend ourselves, our communities, and our states from the federal government in the event it becomes tyrannical and oversteps the constitutional limits on its powers. In Article one, Section eight, Clause 16, pursuant to that, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1792 where they required every able-bodied male citizen between the ages of 18 and 46 except for federal officers and employees to buy a rifle, ammunition, and report to their local militia for training. Pursuant to Article one, Section eight, clause 11, congress is authorized to issue letters of mark and reprisal. This is what authorizes private warships to make war on our enemies. These were the privateers who fired on British ships during the war of eighteen twelve. Our framers contemplated a people who were heavily armed. That is why we never delegated to our creature authority to restrict our arms in any fashion whatsoever. And when the federal government attempts to do so, they are usurping powers which they do not possess. The attorney general goes by court opinions, not the constitution. There is a vast gulf between the two. We have 200 of supreme court opinions, and mister chairman very kindly shared some of these two hundred years of supreme court opinions, which have nothing to do with the constitution. Charles Evans Hughes said over a hundred years ago, the constitution means what the judges say it means. That has been the prevailing dogma ever since and generations of lawyers have been indoctrinated with this lie. That is why we no longer have a federal government which is held down by the chains of a constitution. What we have is rule by five, five judges on the supreme court who claim the power to do whatever they want to us and our country. So today, we have two offices, what the constitution says and what the supreme court says. Well, your oath of office requires you to obey the constitution, not the supreme court. The supreme court is merely a creature of this constitution and is completely subject to its terms. My third point, the AG asserts that the attorney general I'm sorry, that the supreme court is the exclusive and final authority on the extent of the powers of the federal government. But our framers knew that supreme court judges were as likely as anybody else to be corrupt, usurp powers, and act lawlessly. So congress, the president, and the states all have checks on the supreme court. Hamilton shows in federalist number 81 that congress's check on lawless supreme lawless federal judges is to impeach them and remove them from office. The president has his oath of office as a check on the supreme court. The president's oath is to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution. It is not to obey the supreme court. The supreme court was not set up in our constitution as the superior branch of the federal government. And then there's no need for me to well, Madison says in his report on the Virginia resolutions that it is a plain principle founded in common sense that the states as the sovereign parties to the constitution are the final authority on whether the federal government has violated the constitution and that we may that the states may check all three branches of the federal government, not just they may check the judiciary, the executive, and the legislative branches by nullifying their acts. If the judicial branch connives with other branches in usurping powers, our constitution will be destroyed if we do not stop them. This is what James Madison said in his notes on nullify in his report on the Virginia resolution. Sorry I didn't have time to finish. I hope that during questions someone will ask me about the so called nullification crisis of eighteen thirty two. Speaker 0: Thank thank you very much for your comments.
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 1:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scott Jennings criticized Democrats for allowing district judges to decide when the U.S. is under invasion, arguing that it undermines the authority of the Commander-in-Chief. He described the current situation as the largest invasion in U.S. history, highlighting the violent acts committed by some individuals crossing the border. Jennings emphasized that the president is making efforts to address the issue and rejected the notion that individual judges should make such critical determinations. Another participant agreed, labeling the district judges as a disgrace.

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

🔥Scott Jennings RIPS Democrats who want district judges to determine when America is under invasion, NOT the Commander-In-Chief: "It's the biggest invasion in the history of the United States. We've never been invaded this way." "It is an incursion. And I would ask you to ask any of the families who've lost loved ones, if they think maybe that we are at war with the people who have come here, who have committed violent acts, who have m*rdered people, who have r*ped people, who have human trafficked people. It is a disaster what's happened in this country." “The president is trying to pull every lever that's on the books to take care of it. And these individual judges, these individual judges are overstepping. What you're essentially saying is that the president, who is the commander in chief, cannot determine when we are being invaded." "An individual district court judge is going to decide that. No, no, NO."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers debate who determines if the U.S. is at war or being invaded. One speaker argues a law requires an active war, not just claims of invasion, and that applying the law is the court's job. Another speaker claims the U.S. is experiencing the biggest invasion in its history due to millions of illegal aliens who are predatory, and the president should use every available tool to address it. This speaker believes the president, as commander in chief, should decide if the U.S. is being invaded, not individual judges. Another speaker asserts Congress decides if the U.S. is at war, according to the Constitution. A final speaker argues the American system's strength lies in its three co-equal branches, not in deferring to one person's opinion, warning against moving towards a monarchy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's exactly what they did here. What they said is this law requires an invasion or act of war, and we interpret that to mean you have to actively be at war. You can't, as Donald Trump says, come down an escalator and say, oh, people are coming into our country, rape raping our women and killing us, and that means it's an act of war. No. It has to actually meet that definition, and that's the court's job. The president has the right to decide his agenda and and kinda influence public policy. But when it comes down to the application of law, that's the court's job, and that's what they did here. Speaker 1: Can I debate this point? Because I think I understand your your point, and, you know, I have a disagreement about these individual district court judges. But when you think about what's happened in this country, millions of people have come in. It's the biggest invasion in the history of The United States. We've never been invaded this way I Speaker 2: know, Scott. Speaker 1: These illegal aliens, and they are predatory. It is an incursion. And I would ask you to ask any of the families who've lost loved ones if they think maybe that we are at war with the people who have come here, who have committed violent acts, who have murdered people, who have raped people, who have human trafficked people. It is a disaster what's happened in this country, and the president is trying to pull every lever that's on the books to take care of it. And these individual judges I appreciate these individual judges are overstepping if you're what you're essentially saying is that the president, who is the commander in chief, cannot determine when we are being invaded. An individual district court judge is gonna decide that? No. Thank you. Who gets Speaker 2: to wait. Can I just ask a simple question? Who gets to decide whether The United States is at war? The president in my opinion. Speaker 1: No. If we're being invaded, I want the commander in chief tonight. Speaker 2: Scott. Scott. No. It's actually the congress. Speaker 1: When the you're asking if if we're being invaded. Speaker 2: I'm asking the You wanna call congress and see if we're being invaded? Constitution. Speaker 1: We'll be taking over before they ever get to the convention. Speaker 2: That's gets you to decide whether The United States is at war. The answer is congress. Speaker 1: I'm talking about if we're Speaker 2: being invaded. The president No. You hear Speaker 0: his colloquiums. Speaker 2: War Yeah. He has to Speaker 0: show We're actively war. Speaker 1: And really what he needs to do is go Speaker 0: to congress. Speaker 1: You guys can't just get a hold roll it in another Speaker 3: 20 Wait a second, though. I thought I thought the genius of our system was that we weren't beholden to one guy's opinion. That the genius of the American system of government was that we had three co equal branches, and in those co equal branches, decisions were made about how we go about doing things. Now we wanna tear that to shreds so that we can kowtow to one guy's opinion, then we are in a monarch in a monarchy. We're being moved. Speaker 1: Please the commander Speaker 2: do you guys have the

@badboujeebabee - BoujeeBombshell

@WesternLensman Correct the district judges are a disgrace. https://t.co/n2pL1aQRWD

Saved - May 16, 2025 at 2:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the ongoing judicial battles against Trump, which I believe are undermining our democracy. It seems that unelected judges are sabotaging his presidency and blocking his executive orders, particularly regarding birth tourism and border security. I see a pattern of increased nationwide injunctions since Trump took office, which I view as a coordinated attack on America First policies. The situation feels like a constitutional crisis, and I’m frustrated that Congress isn’t taking action to address this judicial overreach. The stakes are high for our republic.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

🚨 BREAKING: The DEEP STATE JUDGES trying to BLOCK TRUMP from SAVING AMERICA!! Supreme Court FINALLY fighting back against ROGUE JUDGES who've been running a SHADOW GOVERNMENT! This is the battle for our REPUBLIC! 🔥🔥🔥 1/12 https://t.co/ATj8q3v2BW

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

The GLOBALIST JUDGE CABAL has been SABOTAGING Trump since DAY ONE! 675 UNELECTED TYRANTS with BLACK ROBES stopping our ELECTED PRESIDENT! These DISTRICT DICTATORS think they can rule from their little COURTROOM KINGDOMS! The SYSTEM is RIGGED! 2/12 https://t.co/KJhLZ2ki7H

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nationwide injunctions allow a single federal judge or a small group to halt Trump administration policies, even with weak legal justification. An injunction issued in one jurisdiction, like Maryland, can halt implementation of a law across the entire country, not just locally. A new parallel court system could be created to specifically handle requests for nationwide injunctions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nationwide injunctions mean that one lone federal judge or a small group of them can entirely block everything the Trump administration wants to do even if their legal pretext is somewhat flimsy. And that means if something happens in Maryland, they're not just issuing an injunction of the Maryland jurisdiction. All of America must stop the implementation of said law because what happens in Maryland? It's a nationwide injunction for something where the violation or the thing in question is happening locally. You see, they could create a new parallel court system whose only purpose is handling requests for nationwide injunctions.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

There were SIX nationwide injunctions under Bush, TWELVE under Obama, but a STAGGERING 64 under Trump's first term! Now on pace for EVEN MORE! This isn't coincidence - it's COORDINATED JUDICIAL WARFARE against America First! 3/12 [Kirk(4).txt] https://t.co/mc5WEanE1T

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nationwide injunctions occur when a district court judge blocks a law or order from being implemented nationwide, despite their jurisdiction typically covering only one state or part of one state. These injunctions were once uncommon, with six issued during George W. Bush's presidency and twelve during Obama's. However, their frequency increased significantly during Donald Trump's first term, with 64 being issued. At the current rate, this number could be surpassed in the first year of a second Trump term.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The matter of nationwide injunctions. Pretty much instantly after the Trump executive order, a district court judge issued a nationwide injunction. That's where a single district court judge whose jurisdiction is just one state or even part of one state blocks a law or order from being implemented nationwide. You see nationwide injunctions used to be rare. There were just six of them under George W. Bush's term. There were 12 of them during Obama's presidency, but there were 64 of them in Trump's first term. And at this current pace, he might top that figure in the first year of his second term.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

BIRTH TOURISM is REAL! Foreign nations SENDING pregnant women to EXPLOIT our laws! They give birth, go back to CHINA, then return YEARS LATER claiming CITIZENSHIP! The 14th Amendment was for SLAVES, not FOREIGN INVADERS! 4/12 https://t.co/GkUYBWFaWU

Video Transcript AI Summary
A birth tourism industry exists where pregnant individuals travel to the US to give birth. Evidence suggests some countries, possibly China, send people to the US for this purpose. The children born in the US are then raised in their home countries for many years. Later, these individuals can return to the US and claim citizenship due to their birthright. Abuses like these led to President Trump's executive order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a birth tourism industry, where people will pay to come to our shores, in their seventh or eighth month of pregnancy when it's still relatively safe to travel, and they will then stay in hospitals until they give birth, and they will go back into their countries. And and there are certainly evidence out there that there are some countries, surprise me if it was China, that are in fact sending people here to give birth, so that at some point, they can take those children who have been living back in China, for, you know, many, many years and bring them back to The United States and then claim that they are that the people that are coming back to The United States are in fact US citizens by dint of the fact that they were born on our shores. I believe it is exactly abuses like that among many, that led president Trump to enter the executive order that he did. Alright. That's John

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

Trump's EXECUTIVE ORDER would END this ABUSE! But ACTIVIST JUDGES have BLOCKED it nationwide! One judge in MARYLAND can stop what VOTERS in ALL 50 STATES demanded! This isn't DEMOCRACY - it's JUDICIAL TYRANNY! 5/12 [ABC Subclip(2).txt] https://t.co/LKxCxjvPHl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments regarding nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Federal appeals courts have maintained the order on hold, suggesting it is likely unconstitutional. President Trump contends that the lower courts overstepped their authority. He is requesting the Supreme Court to lift the injunctions or, at minimum, permit the administration to begin planning for the change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The supreme court is hearing arguments over nationwide injunctions blocking president Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship. Three federal courts, have kept the federal appeals courts, that is, have kept the order on hold, finding it very likely unconstitutional. But president Trump argues the lower courts exceeded their authority. Now he's asking the supreme court to lift the injunctions or at least allow the administration to start planning for the change.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

TRAITORS outside Supreme Court speaking SPANISH while protesting BORDER SECURITY! They're chanting "DOWN WITH DEPORTATION" right in front of our highest court! They're not even HIDING their INVASION AGENDA anymore! 6/12 https://t.co/RFTWcVLtBv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Anti-Trump protesters are demonstrating outside the Supreme Court against Trump's secure border policies. The crowd is chanting "down, down with deportation, up, up with liberation." According to the speaker, the protesters have been chanting in Spanish, which the speaker finds annoying considering the location is outside the United States Supreme Court. More footage is available on Laura Loomis' X account.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're outside the Supreme Court this morning as the left's anti Trump protesters are now protesting Trump for his secure border policies. As you can hear behind me, the crowd is chanting down, down with deportation, up, up with liberation. The same crowd has been literally chanting things in Spanish all morning, which is kind of annoying considering we're outside the United States Supreme Court. Stay tuned to Laura Loomis' ex account for more exclusive footage of this crazy open borders anti Trump protest at Scott's.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

The 14th Amendment was TWISTED and PERVERTED by the GLOBALISTS! It was meant for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War, NOT for illegal aliens sneaking across our border to DROP ANCHOR BABIES! The ORIGINAL INTENT is CLEAR! 7/12 https://t.co/XBmHwaWzAo

Video Transcript AI Summary
The case concerns birthright citizenship and the Trump administration's attempt to reinterpret the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are citizens. The Trump administration announced it would no longer automatically grant citizenship to children of illegal immigrants, tourists, and temporary guest workers. However, this order did not take effect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The case concerns birthright citizenship. One of the first orders of the Trump administration was an announcement that this administration is henceforth reinterpreting the meaning of the fourteenth amendment. The fourteenth amendment dates back to the end of the civil war. Its first clause reads, quote, all persons born or naturalized in The United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of The United States and of the state wherein they reside. Now the Trump administration announced that from now on, the children of illegal immigrants, tourists, and temporary guest workers are not automatic US citizens. That order didn't take effect, though, and that's the other issue being debated today.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

Trump Administration CORRECTLY argues these nationwide injunctions are a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS! They "prevent percolation of novel legal questions" and "encourage RAMPANT FORUM SHOPPING"! The LEFT shops for sympathetic judges! 8/12 [ABC Subclip.txt] https://t.co/5kn63ZNS8E

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump administration's attorney argues injunctions are a bipartisan problem spanning five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed judicial power granted in Article III, which should only address injury to the complaining party. They transgress the traditional balance of equitable authority and create practical problems. Universal injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions and encourage rampant forum shopping. Judges are required to make rushed, high-stakes, low-information decisions. They create confrontations between the life-tenured and representative branches of government and disrupt the Constitution's separation of powers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So far, the Trump administration's attorney has argued the injunctions are a bipartisan problem that has spanned the last five presidential administrations. Speaker 1: Universal injunctions exceed the judicial power granted in Article III, which exists only to address the injury to the complaining party. They transgress the traditional balance of equitable authority, and they create a host of practical problems. Such injunctions prevent the percolation of novel and difficult legal questions. They encourage rampant forum shopping. They require judges to make rushed, high stakes, low information decisions. They create what justice Powell described as repeated and essentially head on confrontations between the life tenured and representative branches of government, and they disrupt the constitution's careful balancing of the separation of powers.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

Sotomayor exposed her RADICAL AGENDA with GUN CONFISCATION hypothetical! She's TELEGRAPHING the LEFT'S PLAN to TAKE YOUR GUNS while pretending to defend "judicial power"! These people are SICK and TRANSPARENT! 9/12 https://t.co/hVTz4yuTis

Video Transcript AI Summary
One key question is whether a federal judge can block a presidential policy nationwide. The administration argues this creates an unfair playing field, forcing the government to "win everywhere" while plaintiffs "can win anywhere." Justice Sotomayor responded skeptically, saying the administration's argument "makes no sense whatsoever," and that it would limit the ability of federal courts, and even the Supreme Court, to issue nationwide relief. She asked what would happen if a president issued an executive order to take away everyone's guns, and whether courts would have to "sit back and wait for individuals to sue one by one." The administration also argues that the Fourteenth Amendment's birthright citizenship provision was meant for freed slaves, not immigrants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Selena, what stands out to you from questioning so far? We never know what justices are are thinking, but sometimes it's interesting to hear the questions they choose to Speaker 1: ask. Yeah, Diane. Well, as you were just outlining, I mean, one of the key questions here is can an individual federal judge then block a presidential policy nationwide? And the administration here is arguing that the ability to do so creates an unfair playing field saying, quote, this forces the government to win everywhere while the plaintiffs can win anywhere. Now justice Sodio So Sodio Mayor had very skeptical response. She had a tough line of questioning. She said that the administration's argument, quote, makes no sense whatsoever, saying that this would not only limit the ability of federal courts, but also the supreme court to issue nationwide relief. She also made an interesting analogy saying, what would happen if a new president issued an executive order to take away everyone's guns? She asked if in that case, the courts would have to, quote, sit back and wait for individuals to sue one by one to challenge the constitutionality of such an order. Now the administration is also arguing that the fourteenth amendment's provision of birthright citizenship at the time of its passage was meant for freed slaves. It was not meant to apply to immigrants to The United States.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

We survived until the 1960s WITHOUT nationwide injunctions! They EXPLODED in 2007 when the 9th Circuit started using them for ENVIRONMENTAL CLAIMS! It's the CLIMATE CULT's gift to the DEEP STATE! 10/12 https://t.co/bh57yJ1GRA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Injunctions were not universally applied until the 1960s, with *Wertz* in 1963 identified as the first instance, according to the speaker's interpretation of *Trump v. Hawaii*. A dispute exists regarding *Perkins v. Lukens Oil* from 1940. The speaker cites cases like *National Treasury Employees Union*, *Perkins v. Lukens Oil*, *Frothingham*, *Massachusetts v. Mellon*, and *Scott v. Donald* to show courts have historically limited injunctive relief to the plaintiffs in the case. Universal injunctions were rare even in the 1960s, with a surge occurring around 2007, particularly in the Ninth Circuit concerning environmental claims, as highlighted in a cert petition for *Summers v. Island Institute*. Justice Alito is then addressed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Injunctions used. We believe that the best reading of that is what you said in Trump against Hawaii, which is that Wertz in 1963 was really the first universal injunction. There's a dispute about Perkins against Lukens Oil going back to 1940. And, of course, we point to the court's opinion that reversed that that that universal injunction issued by the DC circuit and said it's it's profoundly wrong. Now if you look at the the the cases that the either party site, you see a common theme. The cases that we cite, like National Treasury, Treasury's Employment Union, Perkins against Lukens Oil, Frothingham, and and Massachusetts against Mellon, going back to Scott against Donald. And all of those, those are cases where the court considered and addressed the sort of universal, in that case, statewide, issue of provision of injunctive relief. So when the court has considered and addressed this, it has consistently said, you have to limit the remedy to the plaintiffs who are appearing in court in complaining of that remedy. So we survived until the nineteen sixties without universal injunction. That's exactly correct. And in fact, those are very limited very rare even in the nineteen sixties. It really exploded in 02/2007 in our cert petition in Summers against Island Institute. We pointed out that the Ninth Circuit had started doing this in a whole bunch of cases involving environmental claims. Justice Alito? You began by outlining what you

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

Congress could FIX THIS IMMEDIATELY but they're SITTING ON THEIR TAILS! We control Congress - what are they DOING all day?! The UNIPARTY wants judges to have this power to BLOCK TRUMP when needed! DRAIN THE SWAMP NOW! 11/12 https://t.co/1cidv0N97O

Video Transcript AI Summary
A fundamental question is whether a district court judge's jurisdiction, limited to their district, allows them to issue nationwide orders. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this issue. It is argued that they shouldn't have this power. Congress could resolve this, and Republicans, who control Congress, should act. Congress should fix this problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a lot they could do. There's a lot of good ideas out there, but they not might not be necessary. Because an obvious question is this, and this is the fundamental question. And I'm glad we're actually getting this out of the way in the first six months of the Trump administration. And I'm glad we're getting it done quick. It's very important. The question is this. If a district court judge's jurisdiction is only over his his or her own district, how can they have the power to issue a nationwide order? Arguably, they shouldn't, and that's what the supreme court just heard in oral arguments today. And, of course, we should be clear. Congress could fix this. We control congress, and we should not let republicans off the hook. What are they doing all day long? Hello? Congress, get off your tail. Fix this.

@NextNewsNetwork - Next News Network 🇺🇲

Wrap-up Tweet: The battle is ON! One lone judge should NOT have power to BLOCK the PRESIDENT! This case will determine if we're a REPUBLIC or a JUDICIAL DICTATORSHIP! Stay tuned for MASSIVE revelations! FOLLOW @NextNewsNetwork for the TRUTH they don't want you to hear! 12/12 https://t.co/uJbN07e9cT

Saved - June 23, 2025 at 1:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received the transcript of Judge Breyer's hearing regarding his potential order to halt the president's use of the National Guard in California under the Posse Comitatus Act. Despite the Ninth Circuit ruling that the president had the authority to deploy the guard, Breyer seems determined to find a way to reverse this decision. He expressed uncertainty about jurisdiction and requested briefs from the parties involved. Additionally, I provided an explainer on the background of Newsom's lawsuit and the appellate court's decision.

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

I just received the transcript of Judge Breyer's hearing this morning about the possibility of his entering another order to halt the president's use of National Guard in California--this time, under the Posse Comitatus Act which prevents the military from being involved domestic law enforcement. Although the CA appellate court (Ninth Circuit) clearly concluded last night the president was within his authority under a federal statute to deploy the guard, Breyer is now trying to find any angle to institute another order reversing Trump. He is off his rocker. Breyer: "It is not clear to me that the Ninth Circuit's stay of the [temporary restraining order] divests this Court of its usual authority...to grant or modify an injunction as to the Posse Comitatus Act following its refusal to grant one. Of course, this Court recognizes that the Ninth Circuit has the authority to modify, restore, or grant an injunction while the appeal is pending. So that I can be sure that I am operating within my jurisdiction, I would like the parties to submit briefs by noon on Monday, June 23rd, 2025, addressing whether this Court or the Ninth Circuit retains primary jurisdiction to modify or grant an injunction under the Posse Comitatus Act."

@julie_kelly2 - Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

My explainer here on the background of Newsom's lawsuit and the appellate court decision https://www.declassified.live/p/another-big-l-for-newsom?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

A(nother) Big L for Newsom Newsom's victory lap after a Clinton judge upheld his lawsuit against President Trump last week looks even more buffoonish after a California appellate court just took another stab at his ego. declassified.live
View Full Interactive Feed