reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@Ginger_Zee - Ginger Zee
When I went to college for meteorology, cloud seeding was “inefficient & expensive.” That is NOT the case today. 42 projects in 10 states w/ hundreds of ground based cloud seeders sending silver iodide into storms to make them snow more than they naturally would. More on @GMA Tuesday! #weathermodification
@vegastarr - vegastar
Manipulating the weather since 1915 ⛈️ https://t.co/O3FQsRf4bz
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1900s, Charles Hatfield claimed he could make it rain and was hired by Los Angeles farmers to bring rain for $50. He built a tower and used chemicals, resulting in 11 inches of rain falling. San Diego City also contracted him to fill Lake Marina for $10,000, and it started raining after he set up his towers. However, heavy rain caused dams to rupture, leading to 20 deaths and lawsuits. The California Supreme Court ruled it as an act of God, so neither Hatfield nor the city were liable for damages. Hatfield was known by various names like the rainmaker, but he didn't receive his payment. The fate of Hatfield remains unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or later, it is. If you had a bunch of chemicals and you built a tower, could you make it rain?
Speaker 1: No. Well, that's
Speaker 0: that's the subject of tonight's weird weather.
Speaker 1: In the early 1900, there was a gentleman who said he could make it rain, Charles m Hatfield. Well, he said for $50, he could deliver. Well, Los Angeles farmers said we need rain. Will you make it rain? He did.
And they were so happy, they paid him $100. Well, there was a lake in the area, Lake Hemet. He said for $4,000, he could deliver 4 inches of rain. So he made this tower, and he mixed up some chemicals. Guess what?
Eleven inches of rain fell, and it rose 22 feet. Operators say it was the best bargain they'd ever had. There was another area that needed it. San Diego City contracted him to fill Lake Marina in 1 year. If he did it, $10,000.
If not, he didn't get a penny. January 1st, we put his towers up and started sending his chemicals away. January 5th, it began to rain. January 10th, heavy rain And kept going. And by January 15th, it had been a downpour for nearly 5 days.
Speaker 0: Okay. So the rain did come, The 26th, record breaking rains were still falling. And the next day, dams were rupturing. Huge amounts of water pouring out of the mountains heading into San Diego. Twenty people lost their lives.
35 inches of rain fell that month. Well, you can imagine there were lawsuits in the millions. The city council says, nope. We're not gonna pay. Hatfield said, I'll settle for 4,000.
Council said no. It went to the California Supreme Court. They ruled that was an act of god. Well, if that's the case, neither Hatfield nor the city Was liable for the damages. Also, if it was an act of God, then that means Hatfield didn't do it.
City council? Nope. They say they're not gonna pay. Well, Charles Hat Hatfield was known by many names. He was a cloud coxer, a water magician, a moisture accelerator, the wizard of hope, A pluviculturalist, the great precipitator, but most of the time, he was just known as Hatfield the rainmaker.
Speaker 1: My. Should
Speaker 0: have bottled those, chemicals. Maybe not. It was a secret. And even his brother didn't know. But the scientist of the day said there's no way that a man could do that.
Well, he asked well, it kept raining. Well, he was guessing lucky. Well, he guessed really, really lucky. He didn't
Speaker 1: get his money.
Speaker 0: Well, what happened? No. He didn't get his money. We'll have find out what happened to him
Speaker 1: someday.
@naomirwolf - Dr Naomi Wolf
Well, here it is. 100s of pages if reports on weather modification efforts, Federal and ‘non-Federal’. With a list of examples. From NOAA’s database. https://t.co/CvhXx8gZCb
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
CHEMTRAILS, WEATHER MODIFICATION, AND CLOUD SEEDING, IN FULL SWING OVER US SOIL "There are currently 42 weather modification programs currently running across the American West" But but, I thought it was just a conspiracy theory.... https://t.co/0YQtgmhbMC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Colorado River is at risk due to decreased precipitation and higher temperatures. Cloud seeding, a weather modification technique, is being used to increase rainfall and snowfall in the region. This involves releasing microscopic particles into clouds to encourage precipitation. While cloud seeding has been beneficial, experts emphasize that conservation is crucial. Despite a successful winter with increased snowfall, more efforts are needed to ensure the river's sustainability. The federal government has allocated funds for cloud seeding projects, with plans for additional ground-based cloud seeders in the future. The Colorado River plays a vital role in providing water and power to seven states.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Colorado River, called the hardest working river in the United States, is in danger.
Speaker 1: This is due to two causes, reductions in precipitation and increased air temperatures.
Speaker 0: The river provides hydropower to 7 states, irrigation to more than 5,000,000 acres of farmland, drinking water to 40,000,000 Americans, and, of course, the breathtaking whitewater rapids running through the Grand Canyon. All of it threatened by more than 2 decades in a mega drop. We can't just flip a switch like Colonel Joe Moore in Mad Max Fury Road, but we do have a superpower straight out of science fiction's x men, the last stand. It's called weather modification or cloud seeding.
Speaker 1: We can't create cloud. It has to be an existing storm system.
Speaker 2: We just give
Speaker 0: it a bump.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Garrett Camins heads up one of the largest cloud seeding companies in the US. Has the desperation in the mega drought made the interest in cloud seeding skyrocket?
Speaker 1: Oh, definitely.
Speaker 0: There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West, like this one in Utah where they take planes like this with flares attached. They fly right into the storm and send microscopic particles into the cloud. Particles that act like magnets for water droplets, bonding together until they are heavy enough to fall to the ground as rain or snow. At the University of Colorado, researchers are working on artificial intelligence to deploy cloud seeding drones. And it's not just cloud seeding from the sky.
There are 100 of those things. That shack you see in the foreground is a ground based cloud seater. The low flame coming out is sending tiny silver iodide particles up into the sky. When a storm comes through, they go up to 2,000 feet above our head into the storm, up those mountains, and make more snow than it naturally would. While cloud seeding has been helping get every last drop out of some of the driest years on record, this past winter, mother nature came through.
The southern rockies, which feed the Colorado River, got more than 4 times their average snow. But experts say it's still not enough. As much as cloud seeding is a boost or a help, it's not a solution. The main solution is
Speaker 1: Conservation.
Speaker 2: Cloud seeding is most successful in wet years, so this was a huge winter for them. They actually stopped early because mother nature was given up so much. Now studies have shown that the environmental impacts from the silver iodide on the current scale, there are no impacts, to snow or rain also downstream. So it doesn't impact, you know, the other weather. They do anticipate at least 200 more ground cloud seeders in the future, and the federal government has committed $2,600,000 to seeding.
Back to you, Geo and Eva.
Speaker 1: Oh, Ginger Zee. Thank you so much. ABC News chief meteorologist Ginger Zee. Just amazing when you look at the technology obviously with cloud seeding, but also the idea of the Colorado River. We're talking about feeding 7 states with that power.
Speaker 0: Yes. And it gives us so much of our food. Yeah. It's very important.
Speaker 1: Incredible. Incredible.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Interview with Ben Livingston: The Father of Weaponized Weather. Before the Geo Engineering program that people refer to as chemtrails was started, this man used weather, as a weapon of war. https://t.co/uMYzFsP0Zg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ben Liddickstein, the first person to intentionally use cloud seeding for military purposes, discusses his experiences in Vietnam and with Project Stormfury. He explains how cloud seeding was used to create rain and damage enemy supply routes. Liddickstein also discusses the potential for weather modification to reduce hurricane damage and the legal and political challenges associated with implementing such measures. He emphasizes the need for government action and expresses disappointment that weather modification is not being utilized more widely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Ben Liddickstein. I'm the 1st person to ever see the cloud with the intention to call it to do military damage.
Speaker 1: I know I can say that and I did it several times before the next person did it.
Speaker 0: Tell me what these clouds are we're looking at. Well,
Speaker 1: these clouds were located up in the southern part of North Vietnam and we needed to make rain down on the Ho Chi Minh Trail, Highway 1, But there weren't any real clouds around. There were a number, this was the end of the monsoon season, but there were a number of these small clouds that reached the freezing level and by putting a small amount of silver iodide in there, we got them to collect and start to build. And as they built, we just worked on the largest tower in the group until a very short time.
Speaker 0: We had clouds that were You told me this cloud got 14 inches of
Speaker 1: Well, this cloud Of course, this is all the same cloud. Oh, it's their top secret. Eyes only. I'll hide you. Yeah.
I got interested in, I mean, one of the modification was a farm boy. Never could understand why the cloud wasn't bigger. It had a little more shade. It was chopping at cotton. So I got in the navy, managed to get into meteorology school, and I think that's really where I learned
Speaker 0: the most of my physics.
Speaker 1: I was assigned to the typhoon squadron in Guam where I served for 3 years as a flat flat meteorologist and meteorological engineer. From there, I came back to so additional school at Texas A and I University down at Kingsville. And from from Kingsville, they sent me to, the hurricane hunters squadron in Jacksonville, Florida. That squadron, of course, had just become involved in Project Stormfury. So when I reported to that duty station as a meteorological engineer, I was immediately designated the military member of the Storm View Advisory Board.
We were doing quite a lot of testing work out over the test range at Channel Lake, California where we dropped cloud cheating flares or generators in the clouds or just where we want to to see what the reaction was. And it was there when I learned for sure that you can really change a cloud by the amount of silver iodide you put in and where you put it. This cloud here, from the time it tried raining till it quit, it put out little over 14 inches of precipitation. What did that do
Speaker 0: to the North Bay and the Bay?
Speaker 1: Well, it just washed all the roads out and there was a bridge attached to a mountain that bombed and could not get rid of it. This heavy rain washing down that river took that bridge out.
Speaker 0: So you guys finally got it done?
Speaker 1: This was on October 13. These are cloud seeding dispensing units on the side of C-1 hundred and thirty's. As you can see, these units held 52 these dispensers held 52 units. And under here on this F4, we had these camouflage, so
Speaker 0: they look like they were Did you fly those?
Speaker 1: Yes. You piloted the f 4? Yeah. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: So you're a jet pilot
Speaker 1: too. Yeah, I did these for about 7 years. You fly all, That's neat. And these were our own airplanes, the airplanes I had in my commercial, but I think goodness And a Duke, turbocharged Duke of course and a Saturn 310 and a turbo 210 and we built a flare that goes into the wings of our airplanes, so that they caused a little resistance if possible or drag if possible. And this right here, these are pyrotechnics that we've cut in sections and fused them, so that they could earn either singles or a pair or cut in half into or cut in 3 pieces or cut in 5 pieces.
So you can see obviously here, although these are dispensed in the vertical, they are essentially a horizontal cloud feeding device. That's how we made these cloud like in Vietnam work because we could take a cloud, take a power technique like this, had a little bitty piece in it and we'd fly by and it's barely touched the cloud with one part. So that kept from blowing the thing apart, blowing the cloud up. So what we would do and like in Carla or Rita, those kind of clouds, we would maybe use this is just one this is one cloud sealing device here cut into 5 pieces. But in one like this, you may be flying 350 miles an hour, kicking one out every 200 or 300 meters and just essentially see the whole area on the horizontal and the whole top of the way.
Amazing. We were the first ones to fly into hurricanes for the purpose of modifying them, if you will. That was Project Storm Fury. I began to to be extremely confident that we could to do whatever we about what we wanted to with the hurricane. The product storm fury had been going on since 1961 and they had already done or had done 2 experiments 1 in 61 and 63.
Well, by 1964, when I was there in 1964, I wrote the plan and and started to have a track and mission for every flight that was on the hurricane cloud genie experiments. So we had documentation for everything. Operation and product current for you are very positive. This report said that we claim they should consider now if a hurricane heads straight towards Miami. So I wanted to continue hurricane reductions and the other part did not want to.
It was a political football, and there are people that were wanting to do more pure research and less application engineering wanted to kill Project Stormfury. So they built up an artificial barrier that prevented hurricanes forever qualifying to be experimented or ceded for damage reduction. NOAA research people came up with data that suggested that if a hurricane went through a certain little geographical area, they were going peacefully in a 100 years that hurricane had been through that area ever reach land. So they made a requirement that the storm must go through this area of I call it the area of improbability before it would qualify for hurricane damage reduction attention. So after, about 10 years, no hurricane went through there and and the people, that is a scientist who didn't want to spend money on, aircraft reconnaissance decided, well, it's just too expensive.
We can't wait any longer till they kill the project altogether. I am terribly disappointed that the government have decided a long time ago not to do the hurricane damage reduction anymore. They can talk about the scientifically rigorous data, the inability of civilian aircraft and so forth to collect this data and pooh pooh the empirical I'm going to say the observation that you make, just by looking out the window or watching your inputs saying it has no value. In order to change the weather and know that that you're changing it, you must have implementation or document it. So my line of business really was to design and make equipment that would document changes in the weather.
You take a cloud that mother nature or god had provided and you alter that cloud. Well, the reason the cloud doesn't expand on its own in most cases is the fact that there's a lot of moisture, but there's no nuclei. There's nothing for the market to stick to. So when you provide the silver iodide nuclei, it causes the water to coalesce to that nuclei. And when it does, it releases heat, which means everything start to rise.
If you produce enough nuclei at the right places in a cloud, there's essentially no limit to how fast and how far they grow because it just keeps releasing heat as it goes up. And, of course, the heat keeps trying to rise.
Speaker 0: So with the nuclei, it's very small and they're put off by these flares, but then water starts attracting to it and then it builds condensation. Well, you you put out
Speaker 1: a g into these put out a g into these silver iodide nuclei, and they attract water. They just sponge it up, but when they do, that water condenses and it releases what they call the late condensation. The heat goes out of it, and the whole thing starts rising. If you're in the business of trying to kill clouds, then, of course, you go up to the area where there are, some vertical shear, the wind blowing some direction or other, and you provide the nuclei at a level above where the raindrops are, they are then so light that, that wind vertical shear really blows the top of cloud away. Then there's no place for the coalescence or the new condition to take place.
Well, the, the joint chiefs of staff had been wishing for quite some time in terms of years that they had some way of of flowing the truck down in Vietnam. That led me to advise the joint chiefs of staff that we had a potential weapon system and so I was I was asked to start to put together a top secret operation to go to to Vietnam to see if we couldn't make it rain more over there as a as a military operation. All the roads over there were dirt roads and, when it rained, it caused a lot of problems. So that during the monsoon season, there were so much rain and water in the roads that their truck really couldn't move very freely. Our mission was to make it rain, during the dry season.
On that particular day, the clouds were very small. There just weren't any real big thunderstorms or anything like that, But I picked the cloud that was sitting out essentially by itself with a number of small clouds. I'm talking about clouds that whose tops or somewhere near the freezing level, but not high enough to really grow. And I nurtured one of those clouds until it finally got got it in well past the freezing level. And then the cloud developed a lot of convective activity, and it started sucking clouds into it.
Just building up and building up, and I took a series of pictures where I called them called for 41 minutes. By the end of 41 minutes, we had flown up to over 65,000 feet. We still could reach the top of the cloud. So we knew we had a barn burner there, and by the next morning, we had washed out everything in the world and did a lot of damage to people and all that sort of thing, but it was a real success as far as blocking the roads off, which is 2 of us involved, a self and a civilian, but we conducted that operation with aircraft military aircraft, both at Marine Corps and then shortly thereafter, we start involving the U. S.
Air Force. Well, we actually began the 3rd or 4th September and by 13th October, we had a couple of storms that had actually washed out bridges and, the results were so successful until, I was called down to Saigon to bring the generals, the air force generals, the army generals down there and they suggested that I need to go make this report to President Johnson back in Washington DC. They were excited about it, but they had no authorization if you will to use this as a military weapon system. I was there in very top secret, classification as a research project. That's why we were able to conduct a mission without international community if you will being apprised of what we're doing and how we're doing it.
It was kept top secret for a long time. It was first reported that this was going on in 1972. That's the first time that congress ever heard about it. So as you can see, it was it was not something everyone knew about for a long time.
Speaker 0: If I still get though, you're the father or something. You use weather weapons first.
Speaker 1: Well, it's okay.
Speaker 0: And and for all we know, is that the
Speaker 1: only time they've been used? Well, that same project that same project went on to and through 1972 when we got out of Vietnam. But there were airports were still doing it.
Speaker 0: But was it only used in Vietnam there or anywhere else?
Speaker 1: That's the only place there. We've had no requirement for anywhere else that I can think of. But it could be used anywhere. Did you ever do any testing in the U. S?
Did I? Oh, yes. A lot. Yes.
Speaker 0: You were the head of what base? You were the head of a acting commander
Speaker 1: of what base? I was the acting commanding officer at the Corona Naval Weapons Research Center.
Speaker 0: And they worked on a lot more there than just weather weapons, didn't they?
Speaker 1: Yes. They do. But my main contribution at Corona was to write a plan for weather modification control for the whole world at any given time. We could send a number of airplanes with with the materials and dispensing equipment we had and probably control the weather all around all the way around the
Speaker 0: world. Why? Because you said it was on it's it's on several major 7 major front lines. Well, they're only from 5 to 7 major troughs around
Speaker 1: the world, at any given time, and they underlate just like ocean waves move back and forth and back and forth. And at any time, there's a front associated with those where all the thunderstorms are located. And but having air having a few airplanes a couple of airplanes, at the right place, you could run down that that line of thunderstorms and do whatever you wanted to with
Speaker 2: them. I know as viewers and listeners, you've heard callers call in and talk about how x 3 has changed their life. You've heard listeners talk about how incredible 10 hour clean energy turbo force is. Well, both products are back in stock right now. In fact, x three has been sold out for more than 6 months.
But despite that, it is 40% off because I want the people who have never tried the product to try it. Our regular listeners and the folks that have already tried it are chomping in a bit to get it. We appreciate them. But less than 1% of you ever buy a product at infowarsstore.com. Go there.
Try x 3. Get the missing link that's essential to all electrochemical activity in your body. This is the purest, highest quality triiodine out there. You owe it to yourself to get a bottle and experience it for yourself. Takes a few weeks to kick in on average.
Get x 3. While you're at it, get turbo force 10 hour clean energy at infowarsstore.com. Both of them discounted right now.
Speaker 1: This is out of the June 1974 Science Magazine, And this article was actually written in 19 well, it says it's written 1974. Yeah, it was 1974. This is when the Senate got wind that something has been going on in Vietnam that they didn't know about and they wanted to know about it. Well, it's interesting to know that this project ended in 1972. It started in 1966.
So you can see the secrecy. Senator Pail, with the kind of aggressive senator about people doing things that the senate didn't know about, he got wind of it and he asked for a briefing. And, and a colonel Sazer, I believe it was maybe it's something else, but a colonel, air air force colonel gave him a briefing, gave his committee a briefing, and told him it'd been going on since 19 in research configuration from 1966 to the present time. President Johnson was was very mild. It turned out that, he know had known my father.
So we had a little old homecoming there for just a few minutes, and then he asked me what I was doing. He told me he had read and been briefed on what we're doing and how we're doing it, and he asked me my opinion of it. He asked if I thought that we could continue that. I said, well, I see no reason why we can't continue it because we'll have the same kind of weather coming up again in March of next year, and we can see it and make rain right into the monsoon system. And we can can then extend the monsoon system, well past its August end to maybe the 1st week in November.
He didn't say a whole lot about it except, he thought it was he he thought it was real weird, if you will, that people could take a little a little weather modification change the whole climate of the country. When I came back, to the states where I had time to do something, as far as weather model kit was concerned, I went back to my my duties, if you will, as being the military member of the joint of the project storm period advisory committee. Without getting anything classified, can you tell us about some of
Speaker 0: the tests you did in Channel Lake?
Speaker 1: Well, of course, in Channel Lake, we had we had different manufacturers of these cloud tuning devices. We had different yields for them. We had different burn times on how fast we want to put all this nuclei out. And so we tested all those things in China Lake. We'd pick a cloud out in the middle of the desert right there.
We had 100 miles test ring. We got that long for the weapon center and went to pick a thunderstorm. We're good at what we wanted to do with it. By 1969, we had all the latest state of the art equipment in a number of airplanes, and we also had aircraft equipped with dispensing equipment to put ceriodide into, into a hurricane. The hypothesis for how to do this had been designed developed by, doctor Joanne Simpson and her husband doctor Robert Simpson was the director of product transitory for a number of years.
And, we followed her policies which said that if you see enough clouds in the right front quarter quarter of a hurricane where the energy sales are, you may build a second a second eye or as a minimum makes this original eye much bigger, which meant you have a reduction in wind velocity.
Speaker 0: Tell us again, Mr. Livingston, Ben, this is exactly who Mr. Simpson is.
Speaker 1: Doctor Simpson, at the time product storm fury started, he was the head of the United States Weather Bureau. With the funds being made available for project storm fury, they created a new department or new entity of government called the National Hurricane Research Center and Doctor. Simpson Doctor. Bob Simpson was a director of that group. So he's preeminent?
Speaker 0: He is preeminent and his wife
Speaker 1: Joanne, I attended a ceremony for her induction into the National Center for Atmospheric Research Laboratory Wall of Fame last summer in which her name was placed on the wall as one of the 5 preeminent scientists in the nation in the 20th century. That's his wife Joanne, who was the head of Project Stormfury for the 2 years. I worked with her for those 2 years.
Speaker 0: And they're saying right here that this is conclusive. So why aren't we saving people 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars and 1,000 of lives? This needs to be implemented.
Speaker 1: This book Hurricane Watch here is very important because it's written by a person who's a former director of the National Hurricane Center. So we've had world's experience in in the research in these things, and I might add that I talked I took doctor Bob Sheets on his first airplane ride into a hurricane in 1964. But but he's he has, documented, a number of things that are important to the subject we're talking about in which, he's described every storm, the background of those storms, what was done to him, and results. He's also described doctor Bob Simpson. He said all in all, Bob Simpson undoubtedly has had more impact on hurricane research and forecasting than any other single person.
And I might add the 2nd most important person in this direction of this field is his wife, Doctor. Joanne Simpson.
Speaker 0: Ben, what do you say to the folks that say, oh, well, if you mess with the hurricane, that might cause some unintended consequence. You know, as if that that energy has to go somewhere, doesn't it just dump into the ocean as cold water?
Speaker 1: It may just spread out and blow across the ocean. It may not go anywhere where anyone cares and they're certainly going to be if there are going to be unintended consequences. You would know within an hour. I've exceeded hurricane. You would know that something is not going right.
We have to do something different before it causes damage.
Speaker 0: So you have days to
Speaker 1: be adjusting. You'd have it. You'd have days the way we plan on doing it. We only have 2 days. We'd only work on a hurricane.
Well, this
Speaker 0: is a pretty exact science now from Vietnam to the hurricanes you did earlier. Seems like, I mean, you guys know how to knock them out.
Speaker 1: Well, for the for the operator, we hope to get last fall. I wrote a
Speaker 0: flat plan for every flight.
Speaker 1: How far they would go? How many particles they would take? And and statistically, how many, nuclei they need to dispense?
Speaker 0: How many tons of nuclei would have taken? You said 2 airplanes, but how many tons of nuclei would have taken? How many airplanes have knocked out Rita for Katrina? You don't measure these power tickets of tons. You measure them in terms of half pounds.
So a cloud seeding device with
Speaker 1: 14 grams of silver iodide mixture in it that produces 10 to 13 nuclei per gram weighs about a third of a pound. So, 400 of those things weighed £120. The composition of a hurricane may have dozens of energy sales in it and they're like the pits in an engine. They did chug, chug, chug. They get stronger and stronger and stronger because they feed off the warm air below them, and they basically turn into this thing they call a hurricane with all these energy sales in it.
We know where those energy sales are. We know what makes them tick. We have a material if you will to alter those to alter those, energy sales and decrease the maximum surface winds in a hurricane. On August 18, 1969, hurricane Debbie was seated 5 times at 2 hour m through our intervals, And the maximum, wind speeds had decreased by 115 to 80 miles per hour at a pretty remarkable reduction of more than 45% damage reduction potential. The cloud was left the storm was left alone on 19th and on 20th went back and seeded that cloud the 2nd time and you could decrease the winds again to just under 100 miles per hour are about 24% more damage reduction potential.
The results from the hurricane dead age pyramid seem so positive that many individuals believe the project should go operational. Seeding major hurricanes that threaten land. A team of scientists at Stanford Resource Institute at Stanford University did a decision analysis on all past seeding events including the ester that's in 1961 and 1963 experiments. Doctor. James Madison of that group reflecting your views stated, we claim they should consider seeding down if a big hurricane comes straight from Miami.
These sign instead, the government may have to accept responsibility for not seeding and thereby exposing the public to higher probabilities of severe storm damage and possible higher death tolls. Number of people, scientists if you will, who didn't necessarily endorse application engineering in the storm. They thought they need more scientific data. They demanded that a third party investigate all of what Storm Pierry had done. Stanford University, was a party or the institution that did the study of the activity product storm period had done.
In summary, the results of the hurricane did experiments seem so positive that many individuals believe the product should go operational, see any major hurricanes that threatened any land mass. And a team of scientists at Stanford Research Institute, did a decision analysis on all past, seeding events including the ones in 1961, 1963. And doctor Madison, the Stanford University, the head of the Research Institute, reported that the government may have to accept responsibility for not seating and thereby exposing the public to higher probabilities of severe storm damage and probable higher death tolls. It's interesting that we were able to do that and have results confirmed by Stanford University in 1969. Since 1947, the government has used excuse they've used the logic of reasoning that liability is a killer for weather modification.
But that's not why probably Storm Tree was was killed and that's not why they aren't doing it now. In my opinion, the reason they're not doing it is well stated by a very senior official from the National Center of Atmospheric Research at Boulder, Colorado and he says, even if a well supported theory of hurricane modification existed, the potential legal aspects of weather modification on this scale argue strongly in my opinion against any such efforts. Just a few of the main possibilities include a, the storm is not modified at all, but some people perceive that it is, get hurt, and sue the modifies. The storm is modified according to theory, but still does not significantly damage does significant damage and some people blame the modification on the damage even though the modification actually reduced the overall damage and impact. And 3rd, the modified storm produced winners and losers and the perceived losers sue.
For example, what if soon after the seeding the hurricane abruptly changed course? This happens all the time in nature. The people affected by the new course might well blame the modification effort and sue. Yeah. If you're studying the situation, you you may learn, and very diabolically so that you don't like to believe that, but there's a possibility and the economics of it, verifies the fact that there is so much damage done that the construction industry in general all over the United States benefit because of cost material goes up.
So the insurance company may or may not gain from having the damage reductions take place. As far as the energy industry is concerned, we all know that they get their money back almost immediately by increasing the price of their product. And it's not unheard of to believe that, that the actions performed by FEMA or the government is not a surefire way to buy votes. So there may not be any political or economic motivation on the government or some major industry part to reduce the damage or hurricanes. The material that we that we put in the atmosphere are not toxic and by volume by volume, there are nothing.
It's my contention that we have a a sure defense against those last those liability lawsuits. We place in our ceiling materials, a trace element of zinc or some other exotic material, so that any rainfall that falls that uses our new to cause the rainfall or the hail or whatever comes out of it. All they need do is collect some of that water, find some of our trace traces of our material, and we would then concede that we had something to do with it. And the other good defense is that we've had such horrendous hurricanes the last several years without any weather modification in past 30 or 35 years, you sure can't blame a weather modifier for causing damage. The other governments are using weather control, for many purposes.
Indonesia, for instance, Canada, Turkey, Greece, Russia, they're all using weather control to their benefit, and we aren't. Well, for for several years, the Russians have had weather control product and weather natural gold. They're using weather control primarily to, protect the the large sites or the site for a large number of the people are congregating for celebration. So such as in Moscow or Stalingrad, when they have these big military events there or parade so forth, they bring their cloud seeding people in and their objective is to keep it from raining or to knock the cloud down. It's it's not just the Russians that do that.
Our company, for instance, does the same thing in Calgary every summer. The idea is to keep the hailstorm and the heavy rain down so that construction business can flourish. It's a contract we've had for 9 years and every summer, we send 2 airplanes up there or whatever it takes and their only their only mission is to prevent hail and keep weather from doing damages in the city limits of Calgary. You've obviously been successful. Well, obviously, yes.
It's just one of those things that we we know how to do and since the government hasn't done it, the corporate people in America have just built the instruments. They've installed them in airplanes, but we have the we have to be just as sure of what we do as a government would like to think they have to be. The men, the materials, the aircraft, and all of the other, support equipment you need are available today to reduce the damage of hurricanes very significantly. I'm talking significantly more than has been more than 35 or 40%. The roof doesn't lift off the house until about a 105 miles an hour.
If you reduce the damages in hurricane by 35, 40%, you're going to save 90% of the damages done by. But once you get down below a 100 miles an hour, there's not a whole lot of damage occurred from from the wind and hurricanes. The attack they've taken is that they're willing to to spend money they haven't got to repair places that are not repairable or the people to evacuate and the people come back and our house have blown away. We think that we think that's foolishness. We think that we ought to be trying to save those houses.
Let the people evacuate, but have them have them come back to a house with the furniture in. Our aircraft can carry over 400, time tuning units. Now those back in in product storm period age could only carry 52. And the fact that we fly 2 and a half times as fast and we know exactly where we are all the time, we feel like we have a much better, opportunity or better chance of reducing these hurricanes by even more than they were able to in in the storm period. Number 1, we would have attacked Katrina before she passed the southern tip of Florida coming across the Gulf of Mexico because there were a lot of people or a lot of lives at stake there.
We may not have done anything with with Cortina, until she got up in the middle of Gulf of Mexico. But from then on, and I'm I'm being the middle of the Gulf of Mexico, I'm talking about to the eastern edge of the oil production. When it got close enough to do damage to the to the oil drilling drilling and producing platforms, we would have started working on patina right then. And, we would have we would have a CD those those energy sales in there based on data from the satellite, radar satellite information, we would have picked the energy sales in that storm and at least every 12 hours, we would have been out there seeing those those energy sales.
Speaker 0: Ben, why are there no lawsuits against the government for nonstopting these hurricanes? You know, I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm not a lawyer, but I really don't understand why because the government certainly has a renegotiation responsibility to the citizens of the country to protect them. They took unlimited steps in creating the the Department of Homeland Defense and spent trillions or 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars on that thing. Yet a hurricane comes along, they've done more damage than that and they always acknowledge the fact that there's some way to prevent it or slow it down. Well, the problem we have right now is that while we've we've contacted every senator in the US Senate, all 100 of them, we've had one mediocre response from one of them. You get the impression that they just don't care what happens about the hurricanes, and we're trying to we have presented a proposal to them to do damage reduction hurricane damage reduction for the year 2,006, and it amount to around $6,000 a month.
But we have enough enough airplane. We have enough people, in our company that we can do that. We need to be out there, see the news hurricanes. If we don't get results that we think we're gonna get, then we can say we're not ready for it, but that's not going to be the case. What's this man?
This is a letter from the Secretary of Navy and it's a commendation medal to me, and it's for meritorious services from 28 September through 1 November 1966. As a member of the scientific operational evaluation team for the Naval Ordnance Testation deployed to the Republic of Vietnam. During this period, Lieutenant Livingston directly participated in project flights in a combat zone and program planning and scientific data collection and evaluation and material readiness of scientific recording equipments and in the daily preparation of weapons system under development, demonstrating outstanding professional competence. He and our procedures thereby improving their effectiveness his unyielding demand for accurate and complete data collections, his relentless search for technical competence and his unwavering devotion to duty were major factors in the outstanding success of the project and were instrumental in the development of a unique major combat capability for the United States. Lieutenant Livingston's outstanding performance was in keeping with the highest traditions of of the United States Naval Service, signed Paul H.
Nitsi, Secretary of the Navy. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Speaker 2: You shouldn't purchase the products at infowarsstore.com just because it keeps us on the air. You should get these products because they are game changing. Everybody knows our information. It's some of the most hardcore accurate intel on the planet. Well, our products are absolutely no different.
They are amazing. They are the missing links people need. And of all the deficiencies that are out there, one of the biggest problems on the planet is iodine deficiency. Just look up iodine deficiency on Wikipedia. More than 2,000,000,000 people the UN estimates have major cognitive disabilities because they haven't had iodine.
It is essential in all electrochemical activity of the body, but most iodine in plants or in meat is bound to other compounds or other elements. So you don't get the full absorption. Not with x 3. It has all 3 of the healthy types of iodine in it. The good halogens, the deep earth crystal, pure nascent iodine, and then 2 other types the scientists tell us help with absorption.
X3 has been sold out for 6 months. It's now back in stock for 40% off at infowarsstore.com, and it funds the broadcast and everything else we do. So I wanna encourage you all to get your x3 for 40% off now at infowarsstore.com. Takes about 2 weeks to kick in, but almost everybody has incredible results. Separately, we have another great product, 10 hour clean energy, turbo force available discounted at infowarsstore.com as well.
It's discounted as well despite the fact we're about to sell out. So whether it's x 3 next level iodine or whether it's turbo force 10 hours of energy, they're both available discounted right now at infowarsstore.com. It funds the broadcast, and it's game changing. Take action now.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
One of the Weather Modification Cloud seeding control centres. Don’t let anyone ever tell you it’s just a ‘conspiracy’ https://t.co/1hTmlrXf4t
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a sunny day in Dubai, no rain. The UAE invested $20 million in cloud seeding research. They do around 1000 hours of cloud seeding a year from the National Center of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi. A cloud seeding expert explained the process: they wait for good cloud conditions, send aircraft to release salt under the cloud, which makes droplets bigger and causes rain. The center makes a salt substance to enhance rainfall, putting it in flares.
Translated into English:
It's sunny in Dubai, no rain. UAE invested $20 million in cloud seeding research. They do around 1000 hours of cloud seeding a year from the National Center of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi. A cloud seeding expert explained the process: they wait for good cloud conditions, send aircraft to release salt under the cloud, which makes droplets bigger and causes rain. The center makes a salt substance to enhance rainfall, putting it in flares.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it gonna rain in Dubai today? Just so I know. I have to drive back from Abu Dhabi to Dubai. No. It's not raining.
It's a sunny day. The UAE government invested more than $20,000,000 in research to start a process called cloud seeding. The UAE performs around a 1000 hours of cloud seeding a year, and it's all controlled by this building in the National Center of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi, where they track the whole process. We met with a cloud seeding expert to explain how the seeding process works.
Speaker 1: We wait the forecast when we have a good, you know, chance for for a cloud. We send the aircraft to that location. Go under the cloud in the first stage of the cloud. There is good updraft at that time, start to release all the salt, and with the good updraft, of course, it will go inside the cloud. The droplets will become bigger and start to rain.
Speaker 0: The center manufacturers a salt substance that helps enhance rainfall. They put them in what they call flares.
@realpetesanford - Peter Sanford
You want proof? Evidence? Start reading !! #geoengineering #lookup https://t.co/weCW98Bl01
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
In 2010 Jeremy Clarkson showed us how man made clouds are produced on land. “NASA’s playing God” https://t.co/NidZ5FxnIe
Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't hear myself over this incredibly loud sound, which is also the cleanest. The cloud above, made by the engine, is just hydrogen and oxygen, water vapor. In an hour, someone in Mississippi will get wet laundry from the rain. It's raining! Let's blame God for making its own weather.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't worry if you can't hear what I'm saying. I couldn't even hear myself. This is the loudest sound you could possibly conceive and, as it turns out, the cleanest. Now the most amazing thing is that that cloud up there, which was generated by the engine, is just a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen. It's water vapor.
And in about an hour's time, someone in Mississippi is going to get wet washing. It will actually rain. I told you. It's raining. That's unbelievable.
Oh, let's just blame god. It's waking its own weather.
@DougandStacy - Doug and Stacy
More solid proof 👇
@Villgecrazylady - Mel
It appears we have now entered the early stages of “yes it’s happening and here’s why it’s good” on government controlled weather modification https://t.co/7SX7a29dYr
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 42 cloud seeding projects in the American West using planes and ground-based cloud seeders to create rain or snow. Researchers are developing AI for cloud seeding drones. Despite a successful winter with above-average snowfall, experts emphasize that cloud seeding is not a long-term solution. The environmental impact of silver iodide used in cloud seeding is minimal. The federal government has pledged $2.6 million for cloud seeding efforts, with plans for 200 more ground cloud seeders in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West, like this one in Utah where they take planes like this with flares attached. They fly right into the storm and send microscopic particles into the cloud. Particles that act like magnets for water droplets, bonding together until they are heavy enough to fall to the ground as rain or snow. At the University of Colorado, researchers are working on artificial intelligence to deploy cloud seeding drones. And it's not just cloud seeding from the sky.
There are hundreds of those things. That shack you see in the foreground is a ground based cloud seater. The low flame coming out is sending tiny silver iodide particles up into the sky. When a storm comes through, they go up to 2,000 feet above our head into the storm, up those mountains, and make more snow than it naturally would. While cloud seeding has been helping get every last drop out of some of the driest years on record, this past winter, mother nature came through.
The southern which feed the Colorado River got more than 4 times their average snow, but experts say it's still not enough. As much as cloud seeding is a boost or a help, it's not a solution. The main solution is Conservation.
Speaker 1: Cloud seeding is most successful in wet years, so this was a huge winter for them. They actually stopped early because mother nature was given up so much. Now studies have shown that the environmental impacts from the silver iodide on the current scale, there are no impacts, to snow or rain also downstream. So it doesn't impact, you know, the other weather. They do anticipate at least 200 more ground cloud seeders in the future, and the federal government has committed $2,600,000 to seeding.
Back to you, Gio and Eva.
@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️
@thehealthb0t To see the whole thread 🧵 tap on the post below and scroll.
@JamesMelville - James Melville 🚜
“There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West. They anticipate 200 more cloud seeders in the future and the federal government has committed $2.6million to seeding.” ~ Good Morning America/ ABC Network (2023) https://t.co/VfCeMPcvY0
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 42 cloud seeding projects in the American West using planes and ground-based cloud seeders to create rain or snow. Researchers at the University of Colorado are developing AI for cloud seeding drones. Despite a successful winter with above-average snowfall, experts emphasize that conservation is key. Studies show no environmental impact from silver iodide used in cloud seeding. The federal government has allocated $2.6 million for cloud seeding projects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West, like this one in Utah where they take planes like this with flares attached. They fly right into the storm and send microscopic particles into the cloud. Particles that act like magnets for water droplets, bonding together until they are heavy enough to fall to the ground as rain or snow. At the University of Colorado, researchers are working on artificial intelligence to deploy cloud seeding drones. And it's not just cloud seeding from the sky.
There are hundreds of those things. That shack you see in the foreground is a ground based cloud seater. The low flame coming out is sending tiny silver iodide particles up into the sky. When a storm comes through, they go up to 2,000 feet above our head into the storm, up those mountains, and make more snow than it naturally would. While cloud seeding has been helping get every last drop out of some of the driest years on record, this past winter, mother nature came through.
The southern which feed the Colorado River got more than 4 times their average snow, but experts say it's still not enough. As much as cloud seeding is a boost or a help, it's not a solution. The main solution is Conservation. Cloud seeding is most successful in wet years, so this was a huge winter for them. They actually stopped early because mother nature was given up so much.
Now studies have shown that the environmental impacts from the silver iodide on the current scale, there are no impacts, to snow or rain also downstream. So it doesn't impact, you know, the other weather. They do anticipate at least 200 more ground cloud seeders in the future, and the federal government has committed $2,600,000 to seeding. Back to you, Gio and Eva.
@JamesMelville - James Melville 🚜
“There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West. They anticipate 200 more cloud seeders in the future and the federal government has committed $2.6million to seeding.” ~ Good Morning America / ABC Network (2023) https://t.co/cQt4Wt7cJJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 42 cloud seeding projects in the American West using planes and ground-based devices to enhance precipitation. Researchers at the University of Colorado are developing AI for cloud seeding drones. Despite a successful winter with above-average snowfall, experts emphasize that conservation is key. Studies show no environmental impact from silver iodide used in cloud seeding. The federal government has allocated $2.6 million for seeding, with plans for 200 more ground cloud seeders in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are currently 42 cloud seeding projects across the American West, like this one in Utah where they take planes like this with flares attached. They fly right into the storm and send microscopic particles into the cloud. Particles that act like magnets for water droplets, bonding together until they are heavy enough to fall to the ground as rain or snow. At the University of Colorado, researchers are working on artificial intelligence to deploy cloud seeding drones. And it's not just cloud seeding from the sky.
There are hundreds of those things. That shack you see in the foreground is a ground based cloud seater. The little flame coming out is sending tiny silver iodide particles up into the sky. When a storm comes through, they go up to 2,000 feet above our head into the storm, up those mountains, and make more snow than it naturally would. While cloud seeding has been helping get every last drop out of some of the driest years on record, this past winter, mother nature came through.
The southern rockies, which feed the Colorado River, got more than 4 times their average snow, but experts say it's still not enough. As much as cloud seeding is a boost or a help, it's not a solution. The main solution is Conservation. Cloud seeding is most successful in wet years, so this was a huge winter for them. They actually stopped early because mother nature was given up so much.
Now studies have shown that the environmental impacts from the silver iodide on the current scale, there are no impacts, to snow or rain also downstream. So it doesn't impact, you know, the other weather. They do anticipate at least 200 more ground cloud cedars in the future, and the federal government has committed $2,600,000 to seeding. Back to you, Gio and Eva.
@disclosetv - Disclose.tv
NEW - ABC on "cloud seeding" boom: "We've been doing this since the 1940s. We've been manipulating weather for a very long time." https://t.co/azX3PAp4gB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cloud seeding is increasing, with plans to add 200 ground machines before next season. There are questions about the safety of chemicals sprayed and the impact of manipulating nature. Research suggests silver iodide used is negligible at ground level. It's argued that humans have been manipulating the weather for a long time. The need to monitor downstream effects as cloud seeding programs expand is mentioned. The manipulation is now to help the planet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That cloud seeding is booming. They anticipate at least another 200 ground cloud seeding machines to be put in before next season. Ginger, this is such
Speaker 1: a cool concept, but is it too good to be true? I mean, how do we know that the chemicals that they're spraying from the air aren't bad for us or the planet?
Speaker 0: The good news is we've been doing this since the 19 forties fifties. Other countries do it, and there have been a lot of research projects that have shown that the silver iodide, for example, is not found. It's negligible once it gets down to ground level.
Speaker 1: So, again, I don't wanna be too skeptical, but is there anything wrong with manipulating nature like this?
Speaker 0: I think that's the question we should have asked when we built every single parking lot and every rooftop. We have been manipulating weather with our us for a very long time. I do think that looking at and continuing research on when these programs get bigger, if it will affect people downstream, that needs to be watched.
Speaker 1: At least we're manipulating it now to help the planet. So
@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal
🇺🇸U.S: YES… WE CONTROL THE WEATHER “Cloud seeding is booming. We’ve been manipulating weather for a very long time. We’ve been doing this since the 1940s.” Wait… what? Broadcast on ABC News. https://t.co/xNGuXFFncq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cloud seeding is booming, with plans to add 200 ground machines before next season. Research suggests that silver iodide used in cloud seeding is negligible at ground level. The practice has been in use since the 1940s and 50s in the US and other countries. Concerns exist regarding the potential negative effects of manipulating nature, but it's argued that humans have been altering the weather for a long time. Further research is needed to monitor the downstream effects of larger cloud seeding programs. The current manipulation aims to help the planet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That cloud seeding is booming. They anticipate at least another 200 ground cloud seeding machines to be put in before next season. Ginger, this is such
Speaker 1: a cool concept, but is it too good to be true? I mean, how do we know that the chemicals that they're spraying from the air aren't bad for us or the planet?
Speaker 0: The good news is we've been doing this since the 19 forties fifties. Other countries do it, and there have been a lot of research projects that have shown that the silver iodide, for example, is not found. It's negligible once it gets down to ground level.
Speaker 1: So, again, I don't wanna be too skeptical, but is there anything wrong with manipulating nature like this?
Speaker 0: I think that's the question we should have asked when we built every single parking lot and every rooftop. We have been manipulating weather with our us for a very long time. I do think that looking at and continuing research on when these programs get bigger, if it will affect people downstream, that needs to be watched.
Speaker 1: At least we're manipulating it now to help the planet. So
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Remember when they said controlling the weather was a conspiracy theory... How does cloud seeding work in the UAE? https://t.co/wmFRFW3lTW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UAE government invested over $20,000,000 in cloud seeding research. The UAE performs around 1000 hours of cloud seeding annually, controlled by the National Centre of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi. According to a cloud seeding expert, when there's a good chance for a cloud, an aircraft is sent to release salt under the cloud where there is an updraft. The salt goes inside the cloud, causing droplets to become bigger and start to rain. The center manufactures a salt substance, putting it in flares to enhance rainfall.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It gonna rain in Dubai today? Just so I know. I have to drive back from Abu Dhabi to Dubai. No. It's not raining.
It's a sunny day. The UAE government invested more than $20,000,000 in research to start a process called cloud seeding. The UAE performs around a 1000 hours of cloud seeding a year, and it's all controlled by this building in the National Centre of Meteorology in Abu Dhabi, where they track the whole process. We met with a cloud seeding expert to explain how the seeding process works.
Speaker 1: We wait the forecast. When we have a good, you know, chance for for a cloud, we send the aircraft to that location. Go under the cloud in the first stage of the cloud. There is good updraft at that time, start to release all the salt, and with the good updraft, of course, it will go inside the cloud. The droplets will become bigger and start to rain.
Speaker 0: The center manufactures a salt substance that helps enhance rainfall. They put them in what they call flares.
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
100 YEARS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION HEADLINES To those who actually still believe we don't have the ability to alter the weather and haven't been engaged in manipulation of hurricanes such as Project Cirrus and think these covert operations just went away, this is for you sheep. https://t.co/n3lKU8Tk46
reSee.it AI Summary
The U.S. Government acknowledged the success of weather modification experiments dating back to the 1960s, particularly Operation Popeye, which facilitated extreme rain in Vietnam. A 1967 memo highlighted that over 50 cloud seeding experiments yielded an 82% success rate in producing rain. Given this historical success, I question why similar tactics aren't employed to combat wildfires or influence hurricanes today. With advancements in technology over the past 60 years, it seems reasonable to explore these possibilities further.
@RenzTom - Tom Renz
BREAKING: The United States Government has recognized that weather modification experiments were “undeniably successful” as far back as the 1960s. In a memo from the State Department sent in January of 1967 the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs acknowledged the “undeniable success” of Operation Popeye. Operation Popeye was a military weather modification program used to facilitate extreme rain in Vietnam. Given this success why aren’t we using the same tactics to put out or prevent wild fires? How much more effective are we now as compared to the 60s? Could new tech - 60 years later - be used to steer or weaken hurricanes? Could it be used to strengthen them? These seem like fair questions. Maybe @Jim_Jordan will have a hearing on this. @mtgreenee is being ridiculed for discussing this but this is from a dot gov website (link in the comments). @glennbeck @RealWayneRoot @realJoeHoft @RealAlexJones Per the Memo: 3. During the test phase, more than 50 cloud seeding experiments were conducted. The results are viewed by DOD as outstandingly successful. (a) 82% of the clouds seeded produced rain within a brief period after seeding—a percentage appreciably higher than normal expectation in the absence of seeding. (b) The amount of rainfall induced by seeding is believed to have been sufficient to have contributed substantially to rendering vehicular routes in this area inoperable. Since the end of the rainy season, the communists have failed to undertake route repairs and there has been no vehicular traffic. (c) In one instance, the rainfall continued as the cloud moved eastward across the Vietnam border and inundated a U.S. Special Forces camp with nine inches of rain in four hours. (d) DOD scientists consider that the experiment demonstrated a capacity to raise and maintain rainfall under controlled conditions to the level at which the land is saturated over a sustained period, slowing movement on foot and rendering the operation of vehicles impracticable. 4. In our view, the experiments were undeniably successful, indicating that, at least under weather and terrain conditions such as those involved, the U.S. Government has realized a capability of significant weather modification. If anything, the tests were “too successful”—neither the volume of induced rainfall nor the extent of area affected can be precisely predicted. The only absolute control, therefore, is after the fact, i.e., to halt cloud-seeding missions.
@RenzTom - Tom Renz
Link: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v28/d274
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
history.state.gov 3.0 shell
history.state.gov
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“They’ve admitted it in their own documents, yet still deny it to the public” Weather Modification & Warfare is very real - in fact it’s likely impacting you right now. https://t.co/POJe4taWlu
Video Transcript AI Summary
HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project in Gakona, Alaska, is comprised of 180 antennas that function as one steerable antenna. It can aim millions of watts of ELF waves into a small area of the atmosphere, injecting 3,600,000 watts into a spot about 12 miles across, 2.5 miles deep, and 90 miles up, roughly 300 miles from Anchorage.
The US military claims HAARP studies the ionosphere for civilian and defense purposes. However, another theory suggests HAARP heats the atmosphere, causing weather changes. Some claim military documents prove HAARP is used for weather modification, despite public denials.
HAARP is one of several ELF wave transmitters globally. The United States operates three, Russia has one, and the European Union has one. It is claimed that working together, these transmitters could alter the weather, change jet streams, trigger rainstorms or droughts, and even steer hurricanes by heating the atmosphere and building high-pressure domes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They are located in Gakona, Alaska. The project is called HAARP.
Speaker 1: HAARP is the high frequency active auroral research project, originally a joint effort of the Air Force and Navy in cooperation with a number of academic institutions.
Speaker 0: HAARP is comprised of 180 antennas approximately 72 feet tall linked together to function as one giant steerable antenna. Steerable because it can aim millions of watts of ELF waves into one tiny patch of the atmosphere.
Speaker 2: The amount of energy we're talking about here is 3,600,000 watts, injecting their entire output into a spot that's about 12 miles across by about 2 and a half miles deep by about 90 miles up.
Speaker 0: This is where HAARP is pointing. It's an area located roughly 300 miles from Anchorage. The US military says HAARP is merely being used to study the physical and electrical properties and behavior of the ionosphere for both civilian and defense purposes. Another theory has surfaced. The intense energy being beamed into the sky by HAARP is actually heating up the atmosphere causing weather changes.
Speaker 1: HARP is being used for weather modification. The military's own record proves it. They've admitted it within their own documents, and yet they still deny it to the public.
Speaker 0: HARP is one of several ELF wave transmitters located all over the globe. The United States owns and operates 3 of them. 1 in Gakona, Alaska, another in Fairbanks, Alaska and one in Arecibo, Puerto Rico. Russia has one in Vasilyrsky, near Nizhny, Novgorod, and the European Union has one near Krumsa in Norway. Working in tandem, these transmitters could potentially alter the weather anywhere in the world, changing the jet stream's course entirely, triggering massive rainstorms or droughts.
Even hurricane steering would be possible by heating up the atmosphere and building up high pressure domes that could deflect or change the course of hurricanes.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
100 YEARS OF WEATHER MODIFICATION HEADLINES To those who still believe they don't have the ability to alter the weather and haven't been engaged in manipulation of hurricanes such as Project Cirrus and think these covert operations just went away... This is for you sheep. https://t.co/j7WxjPJtGu
@P_A_D_D_Y_D - P.A.D.D.Y_D
@JMCDelingpole They revealed their weather manipulation plans to normie-world only yesterday, in full knowledge that the majority of people can only hold one thought in their head and will now only see ‘climate-geddon’. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14161339/geoengineering-Interactive-map-controversial.html
Map reveals locations of controversial experiments to alter climate
A map by ETC Group and Heinrich Boell Foundation, sheds light on the 'alarming expansion' of geoengineering projects.
dailymail.co.uk
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Apparently they (China) did that (used cloud seeding missiles) & the storm got out of control” BBC accidentally let slip that Cloud Seeding Missiles are used to intensify storms. What you really think they’re not conducting the same experiments here…..? https://t.co/hFNC0ovPwu
Video Transcript AI Summary
I wish we had cloud-seeding missiles to clear the skies earlier. Interestingly, they used them just the day before, and it worked. The storm dissipated, but things quickly spiraled out of control, resulting in chaos with pans and barrels everywhere.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Testing. You know, I wish we'd have cloud CV missiles to get to to to take out clouds a long time ago. But, anyway, apparently, they did that the day before. It worked. The storm broke, and then things got a bit out of control.
And suddenly, it's pans and barrels everywhere.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Can’t believe I’ve never seen this short 1959 Disney production on Weather Modification - have you? They knew 65 years ago. https://t.co/gtLOVRJVLv
Video Transcript AI Summary
The battle against the storm begins with chemical cloud seeders and robot planes working over two storm areas in Kansas and Labrador. As the hurricane intensifies with 100 mph winds, the control center activates phase 2 of the control plan, launching vapor rockets to 42,000 feet. This emergency measure aims to create artificial clouds that will block sunlight and prevent further evaporation of water that fuels the hurricane. Meanwhile, reports indicate that cloud seeding in Kansas is causing potential flooding. To mitigate this, specially equipped robot aircraft are deployed to release more cloud seeding material on the storm's edges, while ground seeding helps distribute rain over a larger area. The controller requests another view of the hurricane as it approaches the coast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With a touch of a button, the battle begins. On the ground, chemical cloud seeders begin to work the 2 storm areas. Robot planes seed the clouds from above. The storm centers over Kansas and over Labrador intensify as seeding continues.
Speaker 1: Now changing over to hurricane center h a.
Speaker 0: The fury of the hurricane mounts as 100 mile an hour winds slash the sea to a foaming frenzy.
Speaker 1: All stations sector c, activate phase 2 control plan delta. Set vapor rockets for 42,000 feet.
Speaker 0: Execute. As an emergency measure, the controller calls for a salvo of vapor rockets to be fired ahead of the path the hurricane is predicted to take. These artificial clouds will block the sun from evaporating more water to feed the hurricane. The reports coming into the control center indicate that the diversionary cloud seeding over Kansas is now creating a flood danger. Specially equipped robot aircraft are dispatched immediately to release a high concentration of cloud seeding material into the fringes of the storm.
Heavier seeding from the ground also helps to subdue the rain by spreading it over a wider area. The controller calls for another view of the hurricane which has now moved closer to the coast.
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
But weather manipulation and cloud seeding is just a conspiracy... If you believe that don't look up: Project Cirrus Project Cumulus Project Skyfire And the many more weather modification programs we have used since the 20s https://t.co/i0GtlAj1ZS
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Army expanded atomic weapons research to study weather, experimenting with cloud seeding to convert clouds into snow. By dropping dry ice into super-cooled clouds, they observed rapid crystal growth, creating snow. In 1947, Project Cirrus tested cloud seeding on a hurricane, which then changed direction and caused damage in Savannah, Georgia.
In 1952, a flood in Lynmouth, UK, was linked to Operation Cumulus, a cloud-seeding project. A lecturer claimed artificial rain fell over Lynmouth, causing the flood. Declassified documents confirmed Project Cumulus was active on the day of the flood.
Project Skyfire, a US forestry operation, studied lightning and experimented with cloud seeding using silver iodide to prevent lightning fires, dispersing it from ground generators or aircraft.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Army's need to know more and more about weather that surrounds this planet is a vital part of the expanded research program of atomic weapons. We all talk about the weather. The Army is doing something about the weather.
Speaker 1: I would like to take you into the laboratory and show you a few of the experiments that led us to our outdoor experiments in converting clouds into snow. Using our home freezing unit such as this, we can form super cool clouds just like those in the natural atmosphere by taking a tiny piece of dry ice such as this and scratching it so a few tiny fragments fall into the super cool cloud. Long streaks develop. The particles grow very fast. They grow about a billion fold in volume in a few seconds.
Many millions of snow crystals form and we get the same effect as is produced by dry ice. Dry ice is is not particularly important as far as the fact that the CO2 is primarily important because it's colder than minus 35 degrees centigrade. This is a picture of the first pile that we see it is back last November. Flying in a small Fairchild plane and putting dry ice from a small dispenser in the bottom of the plain and within minutes saw a long streamers of snow falling from the base of the cloud and evaporating into the drier air below. Under many conditions of course, full fledged snowstorms will be produced in this way.
Nature, at last, has permitted to do a little something about the weather. Using Schafer Langmuir techniques, the Army Signal Corps and Office of Naval Research began conducting many of these experiments.
Speaker 2: In 1947, Project Cirrus expanded to test the cloud seeding on a hurricane traveling eastbound 350 miles off the coast of Jacksonville, Florida. They dropped 80 pounds of dry ice into the raging storm, only to realize that the hurricane suddenly changed direction and began traveling back towards The United States. Savannah, Georgia was hit by record breaking winds of up to 85 miles per hour. More than 1,500 people were left homeless, and at least two people died. The total damage was reported in the millions of dollars, and the project and its participants were blamed for what happened.
Speaker 3: On the night of the 08/15/1952, the worst flood in British history swept through the tiny seaside village of Linmouth. 90,000,000 tons of water devastated the area, killing thirty five people and leaving over 400 homeless. 40,000 tons of boulders were dragged off the moors, destroying houses and cars. Porter spoke to squadron leader, Len Ottley. He confirmed that he worked on project or operation Cumulus, which was also referred to as operation witch doctor.
What's more, in mid August nineteen fifty two, Alan Yates, a lecturer at Cranfield School of Aeronautics at the time, was asked to take part in cloud seeding experiments. According to Yates, the artificial rain fell over Linmouth and washed the village into the sea. Newly declassified documents prove that project Cumulus was indeed going on the day of the flood that year.
Speaker 0: Project Skyfire, a US forestry research operation concerned with the study of lightning in all of its manifestations.
Speaker 4: Project Skyfire is aimed at lightning fires in Western forest. In detail, the manner in which your work involves you in the dispersion of clouds which happen to have some effect on, or rather bring about thunderstorms or what have you. Could you tell our audience something about that type of work? Lori, we're conducting experiments in cloud seeding aimed at determining whether or not weather modification techniques might possibly prevent lightning fires. We carry this on work on by seeding clouds with silver iodide nuclei.
We disperse silver iodide from specially developed generators located either on the ground or on aircraft. Our experience has been that we can do the best job through aircraft seating.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
They have been manipulating the weather since 1915 https://t.co/3NmDbEKQHS
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1900s, Charles Hatfield claimed he could make it rain. Los Angeles farmers paid him $100 after he delivered rain. Lake Hemet operators contracted him for $4,000 to deliver four inches of rain; 11 inches fell, and the lake rose 22 feet.
San Diego City contracted him to fill Lake Marina in one year for $10,000. After Hatfield erected his towers and released chemicals, it rained heavily for days. Lake Marina filled, but record-breaking rains caused dams to rupture, resulting in 20 deaths and 35 inches of rain that month.
Lawsuits ensued, but the city refused to pay Hatfield. The California Supreme Court ruled it was an act of God, absolving both Hatfield and the city of liability. Despite being known as a "cloud coaxer" and "rainmaker," scientists doubted his abilities. Hatfield never received his money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Or later it is. If you had a bunch of chemicals and you built a tower, could you make it rain? Well, that's that's the subject of tonight's weird weather.
Speaker 1: In the early nineteen hundreds, there was a gentleman who said he could make it rain. Charles M. Hatfield. Well, said for $50 he could deliver. Well, Los Angeles farmers said we need rain.
Will you make it rain? He did. And they were so happy, they paid him $100 Well, was a lake in the area, Lake Hemet. He said for $4,000 he could deliver four inches of rain. So he made this tower and he mixed up some chemicals.
Guess what? 11 inches of rain fell and it rose 22 feet. Operators say it was the best bargain they'd ever had. There was another area that needed it. San Diego City contracted him to fill Lake Marina in one year.
If he did it, 10,000. If not, he didn't get a penny. January 1, he put his towers up and started sending his chemicals away. January 5, it began to rain. January 10, heavy rain kept going and by January 15, it had been a downpour for nearly five days.
Speaker 0: Okay, so the rain did come and apparently it was Hatfield that was doing it. But look what happened after that. On the nineteenth Marina Reservoir filled the twenty sixth record breaking rains were still falling and the next day dams were rupturing huge amounts of water pouring out of the mountains heading into San Diego. Twenty people lost their lives. 35 inches of rain fell that month.
Well, you can imagine there were lawsuits in the millions. The city council says, Nope, we're not gonna pay. Hatfield said, I'll settle for 4,000. Council said, No. It went to the California Supreme Court.
They ruled that was an act of God. Well, if that's the case, neither Hatfield nor the city was liable for the damages. Also, if it was an act of God, then that means Hatfield didn't do it. City Council? Nope.
They say they're not gonna pay. Well, Charles Hatfield was known by many names. He was a cloud coaxer, a water magician, a moisture accelerator, the wizard of hope, a pluviculturalist, the great precipitator, but most of the time he was just known as Hatfield the rainmaker. My. Should have bottled those chemicals.
Maybe not. Was a secret and even his brother didn't know, but the scientist of the day said there's no way that a man could do that. Well, he asked, well, it kept raining. Well, he was guessing lucky. Well, he guessed really, really lucky.
But
Speaker 1: didn't get his money.
Speaker 0: Well, what happened? No, he didn't get his money. We'll have to find out what happened to him someday.