reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - March 29, 2025 at 11:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve noticed that 40% of Americans engage in a certain behavior at least once in their lives. It’s interesting how everything seems to connect. However, I find a particular policy to be misguided, showcasing a lack of understanding and implicit bias. It’s a clear case of the emperor having no clothes.

@krmaher - Katherine Maher

This is a thing that at least 40% of Americans do at least once in their life. https://t.co/GOHMit6zT1

@krmaher - Katherine Maher

https://t.co/PxsDBD7I3W

@krmaher - Katherine Maher

Ahhh. Somehow it all makes sense. https://t.co/YUznr3uV9Q

@krmaher - Katherine Maher

This ‘policy’ is dumb, it’s a sterling exemplar of not understanding your own product, it isn’t exclusively gendered though it’s now a textbook example of implicit bias, the emperor has no clothes.

Saved - July 26, 2023 at 1:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my research on the early history of PayPal, I discovered intriguing details about httpXcom. I spoke with its pre-Elon owners and interviewed Elon himself, along with other XcomPayPal employees. THE FOUNDERS delves deeper into httpXcom's origins, ethos, and transformation. For more insights, visit https://www.amazon.com/FoundersPaypalEntrepreneursShapedSilicon/dp/B08CWD9WLY. Additionally, I stumbled upon some quotes that shed light on Elons' thoughts about httpXcom during the XcomvsConfinity era. Musk believed that PayPal was the perfect name for a pure payments product.

@jimmyasoni - Jimmy Soni

In light of the Twitter name change, here’s what I found about http://X.com while researching THE FOUNDERS, an early history of PayPal. I communicated with http://X.com’s pre-Elon owners and interviewed Elon as well as other http://X.com/PayPal employees about the URL and its history. http://X.com’s first owners & early years: Early in the creation of his second start-up, Musk had conviction about its name: http://X.com. This was, Musk believed, simply “the coolest URL on the internet.” He wasn’t the only one who believed so. In the early 1990s, a pair of engineers, Marcel DePaolis and Dave Weinstein, had purchased http://x.com for their company Pittsburgh Powercomputer. Their original URL — http://ppc.com — had been taken from them when the contract for managing URL DNS information was taken over by a company called Network Solutions. So they decided to call up Network Solutions and explore other URL options — which is when they discovered that http://X.com was available and bought it. Musk’s first http://X.com purchase: After Pittsburgh Powercomputer was sold off, DePaolis and Weinstein negotiated to hold on to the http://X.com URL, enjoying its use for their personal email addresses. Over the years, they turned down bids to sell the URL, underwhelmed by the various offer terms. In early 1999, they received fresh interest. “Under the looming shadow of Y2K, we were approached by Elon Musk,” they said, “…We checked him out and liked his story and plan.” They sold http://X.com to Musk in exchange for cash and a small stake in the company. The 1999 http://X.com Rationale: Musk came out of the deal sporting, among other things, a memorable corporate email address: e@x.com. He believed deeply in the http://X.com URL and company name, which, to him, seemed novel, intriguing, and open-ended enough to capture the company’s gist—a place for all banking and investment services to coexist. Just as X “marked the spot” on a treasure map, so http://X.com marked the spot money would be kept online. He also noted that the URL was rare, one of only three single-letter URLs in the world at the time (the other two: q .com and http://z.com). Musk had a practical rationale for the name, too. http://X.com wasn’t just easy to remember—it was also exceedingly easy to type. He believed the world would soon be powered by handheld devices facilitating every part of users’ lives—handheld devices with uncomfortable keyboards the size of an index card. In this world, http://X.com was the ideal address because a customer was only ever five keystrokes away from their full financial life. Musk’s conviction about the http://X.com name also grew out of the unfortunate name of his first start-up, Zip2. Heads down writing Zip2’s code, Musk had outsourced the naming to a branding firm—and regretted it. “First of all, what the hell does it mean? It’s literally one of the worst URLs you could possibly have. Because is it Zip, the digit ‘2’? Or is it Zip t-w-o? Or Zip t-o? Or Zip t-o-o?” Musk said. “You just picked the homonym with the most number of variations. And websites don’t work with homonyms. So it’s dumb in every possible way.” “I deferred brand and marketing and whatever to people I thought were domain experts,” Musk said, “And then discovered subsequently that you just have to use common sense. And that’s actually a better guide.” To Musk, http://X.com’s name was everything Zip2’s wasn’t—and he was convinced http://X.com would become everything Zip2 hadn’t. “He was really passionately inspired by that letter,” an http://X.com colleague recalled. The second http://X.com purchase: Decades after purchasing the http://X.com URL, he bought it again in 2017. Musk chuckled retelling his reacquisition of the domain. The broker who sold him the URL saw the deal as a crowning achievement. “He wrote me this long heartfelt letter . . . they were like ‘We are so happy to have restored this URL to you,’” Musk said. At the time, he was asked about his ambitions for the URL, and Musk responded on Twitter. “Thanks PayPal for allowing me to buy back http://X.com!” he wrote. “No plans right now, but it has great sentimental value to me.”

Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com
Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com

@jimmyasoni - Jimmy Soni

This is one of many nuggets drawn from THE FOUNDERS, which has a lot more about http://X.com, its ethos, its origins, and why it became what it became. You can check that out here: https://www.amazon.com/Founders-Paypal-Entrepreneurs-Shaped-Silicon/dp/B08CWD9WLY/ref=tmm_aud_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com
Amazon.com amazon.com

@jimmyasoni - Jimmy Soni

Also, the logo, b/c why not...

@jimmyasoni - Jimmy Soni

Some add'l quotes from my research that wound up on the cutting room floor. These hopefully illuminate Elon's thinking about http://X.com back in the X.com-vs-Confinity days: “For a pure payments product, PayPal is the right name,” Musk said. “If you want to be the center of the world’s currency, it is not the right name. If you want to be Grand Central Station for global finance, then Paypal is like a feature.” “It is a very specific function to ‘pay’ a ‘pal,’” Musk said. “It would be like Apple renaming itself the Mac,” Musk said. “If you want to just be a niche payment system, PayPal is better. If you want to, say, let’s like take over the world’s financial system, then X is the better name, because PayPal is a feature, not the thing itself,” Musk said.

Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 3:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's transformation of Twitter into X raises questions about his true role and intentions. His fascination with the occult, particularly the Osiris myth, and his connections to figures like Alister Crowley and Jack Parsons, suggest a deeper agenda. Magic, according to Alan Moore, is the manipulation of symbols to change consciousness. Musk's involvement in space travel, his plans for a Mars technocracy, and his advancements in AI and transhumanism align with a larger narrative of control and manipulation. The Marvel movies, influenced by Parsons and Crowley, depict a techno Jesus figure like Musk. The idea of a fake alien invasion, as seen in "Watchmen" and "Deus Ex," could be used to consolidate power and usher in a one-world government. Scientology's beliefs in extraterrestrial beings and Hollywood's influence in shaping public perception add another layer to this complex narrative. The ultimate goal may be the establishment of a New World Order.

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔸𝕘𝕖 𝕠𝕗 𝕏 Elon Musk has completed the purchase & transformation of Twitter into X Elon founded the first http://X.com in 1999 (became PayPal) then SpaceX & now xAI: So what's the meaning of X, the true role of Elon Musk & where exactly is he leading us?

Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Let's start with the post Musk made about his X obsession last week In the image he posted he is performing what in Alister Crowley's ritual magic was referred to as "Osiris Risen"

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

This is of course in reference to the Ancient Egyptian god Osiris Slain by Set and cut up into 14 pieces then resurrected by his wife Isis, given an artificial penis then impregnates Isis and is "resurrected" as his bird headed son Horus

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Alister Crowley was probably the most prolific sex magician and occultist of all time. Founding the religion of Thelema and attracting to him students such as Jet Propulsion Labs founder (grandfather of NASA) Marvel Jack Parsons and Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Their stated mission? To bring about a New World Order, or as Crowley and his Thelemites (Like liquid rocket fuel inventor Jack Parsons) would say: The Aeon of Horus

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

But how EXACTLY did these guys intend to bring about the "Aeon of Horus" Well in 1946, Hubbard and Parsons performed the Babalon Working, a ritual based on a book by Crowley titled "Moonchild" Ultimately the goal was to create a "Moonchild(ren)" to rule the new Aeon of Horus

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now is a good time consider what "Magic" or as Crowley called it "Magik" Truly is. In the word's of famous science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke:

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

So if "Magik" is simply sufficiently advanced technology to the point that it's scientific reality is incomprehensible to us currently How does it work? Who could we ask? My favorite explanation comes from publicly admitted chaos magician and comic book author Alan Moore: "I believe that magic is art, and that art, whether that be music, writing, sculpture, or any other form, is literally magic. Art is, like magic, the science of manipulating symbols, words or images, to achieve changes in consciousness ... Indeed to cast a spell is simply to spell, to manipulate words, to change people's consciousness, and this is why I believe that an artist or writer is the closest thing in the contemporary world to a shaman."[

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Moore, as a student of Crowley gives a great example of exactly how true magic is implemented. If art is magic, and the stories crafted and published influence the mass subconsciousness that causes those ideas to manifest in the real world What stories are we living right NOW?

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In 1948, long time friend of Parson's and chief architect of the Saturn V rocket that Apollo 11 took to the moon, (And ex Nazi SS Member, known to do rituals themselves) Werner Von Braun wrote a book titled "The Mars Project" After coming to the US in 1945

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Written just 2 years after the Babylon Working, on page 177 of this book describing a human colony on Mars, Von Braun gives a title to the leader of the colony there "Elon" Mind you this guy is referred to as "the father of space travel"

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Why Mars though? Well it's possibly because Mars was referred to as "Horus of the Horizon" or "Horus the Red"

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In the same year, 1948, mother of Elon, Maye Musk was born to Joshua Haldeman Below you can see her sporting both the Osiris Risen and the Eye of Horus symbols

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Notably the "Mars Project" describes how Mars is governed, mainly in the form of "Technocracy" or rule by the "experts" Not pure democracy Funny enough, Joshua Haldeman, Elon's grandfather, was arrested 8 years before in Canada as the leader of the Technocracy party

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

I have been "criticized" before for drawing this connection between Musk's grandfather and what I believe his current intentions to be Fortunately it is not hard to prove Musk is on the same page as Gramps given that he tweets about it all the time lol

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Accelerating Starship development to build the Martian Technocracy

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

So not only is Elon basically in control of NASA, the successor to Braun/Parsons, but he also plans to lead a Mars technocracy, coincidence right? Btw some things you can look forward to in technocracy is no money, no voting & every bit of energy you used being tracked

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Interestingly enough, Musk has a higher favorability rating and far low unfavourability rating than both Biden AND Donald Trump Arguably becoming just as powerful as a president, buying Twitter and unbanning Trump, Space X essentially runs NASA and Tesla dominates electric cars

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

On the money front Musk started the original http://X.com (PayPal) in 1999 to revolutionize the financial industry and bring it to the digital age With Twitter as X he plans to make it the "Everything App" like WeChat in communist China

Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com

@WatcherGuru - Watcher.Guru

Elon Musk's online bank X․com in 1999 https://t.co/XiCt6SGtHg

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video introduces X.com, a transformative ATM that aims to revolutionize the traditional banking industry. The speaker, who doesn't fit the typical banker stereotype, expresses confidence in raising $50 million through phone calls. They have invested a significant portion of their net worth into X.com, an internet-based banking and mutual funds company. The speaker believes that X.com has the potential to become a multibillion-dollar success, considering the massive industry it is targeting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is an ATM. What we're gonna do is transform the traditional banking industry. I do not fit the picture of a banker. X.com. This is Dewey. Raising $50,000,000 is a matter of making a series of phone calls, and the money is there. I've sunk the great majority of of my net worth into X.com, which is the new banking and mutual funds company on the Internet that I've Got it. Now big big x. Exactly. X.com. I think x.com could absolutely be a, a multibillion dollar bonanza. Because if you look at the industry that x It's is pursuing. It's the biggest sector of the world

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

While it may seem nice to have everything in one place, from social media to finances and messaging, this makes censorship, tracking and control of a population extremely easy Which is exactly what happens with China's WeChat https://t.co/fypCS5qk9K

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

So what's his next move? Recently Musk disabled web users that were not logged into an account from viewing tweets, & limited the amount of tweets that could be viewed by an account. Rumor is he did this to prevent AI bots from using this data On July 12th he launched xAI https://t.co/wBixOAO2Rt

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Elon of course cofounded OpenAI in 2015, contributing millions of dollars to develop what is now called ChatGPT OpenAI is now closed source and owned outright by Microsoft, well known for being censored and politically correct Musk even stated that AI is "summoning the demon" https://t.co/NJZ3vPtEn2

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In Hegelian Dialectic fashion, Musk offers us a solution for the problem he helped create: Merge with machine ourselves in order to compete with AI with his Neural Link, which begins human trials this year. https://t.co/59DJHQhv57

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

This is a concept known as "Transhumanism" The concept of man merging with machine completely. We've covered the predictive programming showing Musk as a Technocrat Mars colonist, let's now explore his Transhumanist savior role https://t.co/I2POKnBnWT

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Above is a real screenshot of when Musk changed his profile picture to the cover of "Deus Ex" A game made in 2000 where in the game the Twin Towers where missing as they had been destroyed in a terror attack... The main character being a transhumanist cyborg savior of humanity https://t.co/LVGYr9m6eF

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

The plot? You're a government agent that finds out that the current pandemic was created by the gov & rebels It mentions the Rockefellers & Rothschilds & it has a techno Jesus Christ theme, the protagonist is "JC" Denton It ends with him sacrificing himself to merge with AI https://t.co/DccIgTGgjH

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Deus Ex Machina is a plot device in which an unlikely savior suddenly appears at the final hour when the situation seems hopless In ancient Greek theater they would literally drop a "god" character from wires unto a stage, thus "God out of the machine" https://t.co/VGKr8ngClG

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

As you can see, the reason Musk keeps tweeting "Deus X" is that he IS a literal Deus Ex Machina, playing the script to a T https://t.co/f1iEZXMyQN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions that the United Nations was built on land donated by John D. Rockefeller and suggests that wealthy bankers have always benefited from a one-world government. They also mention David Rockefeller's description of a supernational sovereignty controlled by an intellectual elite and world bankers. Another speaker claims that the government has a vaccine and riots are happening everywhere, suggesting that the same corporation manufacturing the virus is also making a product called Ambrosia. The speaker implies that people are being intentionally infected. Another speaker talks about witnessing the plotting and scheming of corporations to create a unified Europe without separate languages, cultures, or tastes. The first speaker adds that the plan goes beyond Europe and warns about the dangers of indiscriminate surveillance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mainly by wealthy bankers. Remember that the UN itself was built on land donated by John d Rockefeller. The wealthy have always been the ones to profit from one world government. The United Nations' secret goal well, this is David Rockefeller's description from a half a century ago. The supernational sovereignty you have an intellectual elite and world banker. People know the government has a vaccine. Riots everywhere. The same corporation that makes Ambrosia also manufactures the virus quite convenient. They're infecting people on purpose. Speaker 1: I have seen it since I was a girl, the Plotting and scheming of corporations to make Europe into 1 big country with no separate languages, cultures, or tastes. Speaker 0: It's more than Europe they plan to unify. Some people just don't understand the dangers of indiscriminate surveillance.

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

If this plotline sounds familiar it should. In the 4th Matrix movie that came out in 2022, Neo works at a game studio called "Deus Machina" https://t.co/IopsoDVWnd

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Musk of course has tweeted "take the Red Pill" in reference to the film series The original Matrix movie, released in 1999 (a Cat/Rabbit year in Eastern Astrology, just like 2023) features 9/11 predictive programming as well Neo's ID expires on September 11 2001 https://t.co/9r1FkNYsd2

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Neo is another techno Christ, plugging into a machine to save humanity, also: -Guy calls Neo his "own personal Jesus Christ" -"Trinity" is in room 303 at the beginning of the movie, Neo is shot then resurrected in the same room at the end - Jesus died/was resurrected at 33 https://t.co/ru5SFU2GcM

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

To tie this all back to Crowley Chaos magic, the (formerly known as) "Wachowski Brothers", who directed the Matrix Also made a film called "V for Vendetta" based off a comic book by Alan Moore https://t.co/8H3YPpfpag

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

This film, released in 2005, takes place in 2027, in a dystopian world where you find out the government secretly released a bioweapon pandemic to gain authoritarian control.... https://t.co/kUdX73TYzX

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

The movie ends with a crowd of citizens marching on the capitol building under the direction of an anonymous leader that goes by a single letter "Q" oh wait, I meant V lol Their mantra is "remember remember the 5th of November" while Jan 6th was about the events of November 3rd

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

That's all well and good, but did Crowley Chaos Magician Alan Moore ever write anything about a Musk like character??? Enter Dr. Manhattan, man (accidently) made God being. Below Musk tweets a pic of the character hanging out on Mars https://t.co/qVLi880mHC

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Dr. Manhattan likes to hang out on Mars solo, building a sanctuary there and at the end of the comics, staying there for good. Oh, to REALLY drive the point home, Manhattan is SINGLEHANDELY responsible for humanity's shift to electric powered cars 🤣🤣 https://t.co/TZYHnEKr4y

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

We have shown how Musk/Crowley adjacent predictive programming has accurately shown - 9/11 - The Pandemic - Jan 6th But what's next? For this lets take a look at an image posted by Musk's ex lover & mother of his son X, Grimes in 2019 https://t.co/tVi0NA1iyT

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

This is where things start to get REALLY interesting, and given the "alien disclosure" Congressional hearing last week, extremely applicable In Moore's "Watchmen" Nuclear war is avoided using a FAKE alien invasion Using a genetically engineered psychic squid to kill millions https://t.co/sbzrkQs18a

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In addition, in "Deus Ex" there are "Grays" That match the typical description of an "alien" However, what you find out is that they are ALSO simply genetic experiments, used by the Illuminati to distract the public from their actual projects https://t.co/20YhRqydQW

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Hollywood in general has always been the main pusher of the publics idea of "aLIEns" and space travel in general. Before the "moon landing" Werner Von Braun was working hand in hand with Walt Disney to program the population for a new space age https://t.co/Wus8dAmaH5

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

It only made sense as Cape Canaveral was just down the road from the new Disney World in Orlando Disney movie "magic" helped prepare the public for moon landings and opened up their minds to range of science fiction Specifically producing a show with NASA called "Man in Space" https://t.co/xI7uGFQCNo

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now where things get interesting is a few select messages Von Braun passed along near and after his death The first was a conversation with his assistant Carol Rosin in which he tells her the ruling classes' final move is to fake an alien invasion The second is on his tombstone https://t.co/yPdR2MaLc3

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In his final messages to humanity the "father of space travel" NASA's top Nazi seemed to only indicate that not only were aliens fake, but that space travel as we know it may not even exist. What then would be the purpose of Parson's & his rocket shows? Another Ritual? https://t.co/8FUXA9PUnd

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Perhaps the Apollo moon missions WERE faked, what if the firmament Von Braun was pointing to is the impassable Van Allen radiation belt? Maybe the best way to usher in a "Moonchild" is to slay Osiris (JFK) and shoot his cock at the Isis moon pussy from the Kennedy Space Center https://t.co/6sSPLafGIO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Every space mission with humans on board, except Apollo, has stayed below the deadly radiation field. To reach the Moon, solid lead shielding would be necessary. In order to compete with the Soviets in the space race, the United States needed to deceive and misinform. They wanted everyone to believe they had the capability to go to the moon. The Apollo program had already spent a billion dollars, and if it failed, it would be a bitter pill for taxpayers to swallow. The program's goal was to be the first to plant a flag on the Moon, and it cost 135 billion dollars when adjusted for inflation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every space mission in history with humans on board, from both the United States and Soviet Union, from the first in 1961 to the present, has been well below this deadly radiation field, all except Apollo. The more experienced Soviets spent 100 hours in space for every 20 hours of the US. In order to survive the hour and a half journey through this radiation field necessary to reach the Moon and return, solid lead shielding between the astronauts and the exposure outside would be required. If it was impossible to better the Soviets in the space race, which was really a race of technological armaments, what could be done? How could America offset the threat of superior weaponry? Throughout the history of rivalry and war, astute generals of lesser armies than their counterparts have used deceit and misinformation as a method to achieve, in World War 2, for example, columns of inflatable tanks were placed at locations afar from Normandy to draw German forces away from the real location of invasion. The Star Wars missile defense program rigged tests to make it seem more advanced than it really was. In order for them to believe the United States had the capability to go to the moon, everyone would have to believe it. Furthermore, the pride of a nation was at stake and the goal of a martyr, Not to mention the growing unrest domestically of a government throwing tens of thousands of lives away in a foreign war riddled with contradiction and ambiguity. In addition, The Apollo program had already spent 1,000,000,000 of dollars. If it failed to achieve its goal with such an investment, it would indeed be a large and bitter pill for the taxpayers to swallow. The cost of the program, whose sole goal was to be the 1st to plant a flag on the lifeless rock just outside the Earth, if adjusted for inflation to the 21st century, was 135,000,000,000

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

This live mass trauma ritual reenactment of the Osiris myth is known as "Killing of the King" Where you traumatize a nation then build a monument to the dead martyr king's (Osiris) honor and rule by his authority from beyond the grave (as Horus) https://t.co/IBW4HpVrmb

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

If this idea of a martyred hero who's authority you rule by seems familiar you might have been thinking of the Roman Empire They had TWO slain J.C.'s to rule by First Julius Caser then Jesus Christ https://t.co/bHGSDsM8EM

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Caesar lived on through every Roman Emperor when people called them the title "Caesar" The Pope is Jesus's closest servant on Earth The US government "went to the moon" under the authority of their king JFK who they had slain themselves (as the Romans had killed the J.C.s) https://t.co/nQ1CO1gz3x

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now to get back to Musk's role in all this: Do you know what symbol from the Paleo-Hebrew(Phoenician) alphabet the earliest Christians used to represent Christ as the omega? The last letter of their alphabet: X Which later morphed into a T shape https://t.co/Cgoc1O2LNd

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now what I'm sure many of you have been waiting for, the most obvious and expensive Musk savior propaganda campaign of them all: The "Marvel" Movies Marvel was Jack Parson's real first name, and Stan Lee was a US Army employed propagandist in WWII https://t.co/7DnVHQ47fL

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Not to ruin the plot for you, but Robert Downey Jr. plays the role of "Tony Stark" or Ironman, in which he says he based the character off of Elon Musk Musk of course was even IN the second movie https://t.co/peqg2rJd0C

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

If the series being named after the Father of the Moonchild "Marvel" Jack Parsons, wasn't enough for you maybe the fact that they based IronMan's father, Howard Stark on Parsons will In recent comics they reveal Stark's father to be a Satanist who sells Tony's soul for knowledge https://t.co/ytKXDESYT2

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In the 22 movies that began with the first "IronMan" movie, the Avengers End Game film ends with Ironman sacrificing himself in Christ like fashion to stop Thanos' depopulation plot https://t.co/FQqPcGHIUd

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Marvel Jack Parsons referred to himself as the Antichrist and Crowley called himself the Beast 666. What would a Moonchild antichrist really be like? One that got his powers from his own intelligence and wealth rather than be divinely blessed by God? https://t.co/3DULkPOmSP

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

The best part is that Stark even has a transhumanist resurrection as an AI, right on cue with the rest of the techno Jesus roles Exactly the kind of stuff Musk is looking to achieve with Neural Link and AI https://t.co/DLF7rwLPTD

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Some other fun facts about Stan Lee and Marvel, Not only was Lee behind Ironman, but he also made X-Men and the wizard Dr. Strange In X-Men there's Professor X, the leader, who opposes Magneto, much like Musk vs Soros https://t.co/KDYEIhhZU9

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In Thelema, the mother goddess Babalon was also referred to as the "Scarlet Woman" who would help manifest the Aeon of Horus This is how Crowley/Parsons referred to their partners in sex magic If Elon Musk is Iron Man, than Crowley is 100% represented by Marvel's Dr Strange, who in the most recent movie "Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness" The antagonist "The Scarlet Witch" and he do rituals that at the end of the movie causes him to grow a demonic third eye

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

On this note it's interesting to bring up the fact that Crowley had claimed to have channeled a Gray alien looking entity called Lam in 1918 This is nearly 30 years before the events of Roswell New Mexico, was this image used to imprint on the minds of the public as an "alien"? https://t.co/gNVJvPmyRm

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now that we covered the different ways Marvel Jack Parsons and Crowley have contributed to this Moonchild timeline... But what about the other man that was in the Mojave Desert in 1946 helping Marvel perform the Babalon Working? Lets Talk about Scientology founder L Ron Hubbard https://t.co/lgmeLvpT90

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Many people are familiar with Scientology because of the church's prominence in Hollywood, with many famous actors such as Tom Cruise among their ranks Consider how a cult of Hollywood king pins could collude to program the public towards a certain goal https://t.co/nM6SV1VzZ3

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

But what ARE their beliefs exactly? That's a great question that even members of the "church" don't get answered until they've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars and raised through the ranks I think you'll find the plot very familiar lol https://t.co/H6zMyl68gn

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In Scientology they believe that an alien called Xenu (emphasis on the X) who was the ruler of a Galactic Federation solved his planets overpopulation problem by bringing billions of people to earth and dropping them in volcanos Those souls then became "Thanos" oh wait "Thetans"

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Scientology, after reaching the state of clear by getting rid of the reactive mind, the next step is the OT levels. At this point, L. Ron Hubbard claims that individuals have tens of thousands of thetans attached to their bodies, each with their own reactive minds. To address this, auditing is done using an e-meter to communicate telepathically with these spirits. However, this process can lead to mental breakdowns and is combined with Scientology's opposition to mental health outside of the organization. The story of Xenu is introduced to explain the origin of these spirits, involving a dictator who brought people to Earth and trapped their spirits. The OT levels continue with the discovery of more body thetans and past life memories until OT 8, where individuals are told that these memories belonged to their thetans, not themselves. OT 9 and 10 do not exist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can you describe Zeno, please? We spoke earlier about how at the lower non confidential levels of Scientology's bridge, Hubbard is saying that what's wrong with you is your reactive mind. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, in Scientology, once you've gotten rid of your reactive mind, that is what's called the state of clear. Mhmm. Okay. So after you finish state of clear, the next thing on the bridge is the OT levels. Mhmm. Well, if you've already gotten rid of your active mind, what the heck are you supposed to do now? Well now L Ron Hubbard says, okay, first, what was wrong with you was just your reactive mind. But now the next thing you have to resolve, the next thing that's wrong with you is you actually have tens of thousands of of thetans stuck to your body and they all have their own reactive minds. Speaker 1: Oh, wow. Speaker 0: You have to audit the thetans. Speaker 1: How do you audit the thetans? Are these, like, different shades of your inner mind and you have to try to access them somehow. Speaker 0: You use the e meter just like we spoke about, except now you've got a divider that separates the cans, so they don't short circuit and you hold both cans in one hand. Mhmm. And you have the emitter in front of you. So now you're auditing yourself. You're telepathically talking to the things that are stuck to you. You're thinking the commands instead of saying them out loud. And you sort of do drills where you practice looking for emitter reads at the instant you have a thought. You're telepathically auditing spirits that L run Hubbard says are stuck to your body. Does this sound like a recipe for a mental breakdown Speaker 1: or a heck of a mental journey? Wherever that leads, it could lead anywhere. It probably lead to a very bad place. Right? Speaker 0: Very often does. And you combine that with the fact that Scientology is against any forms of mental health or health outside of Scientology, and you have a recipe for disaster. Now, you might go, where did all these spirits come from that are stuck to your body? This is where Zenu comes into play. So Hubbard says that 75000000 years ago, Xenu, was basically, a dictator at, the Galactic Confederation is like 70 something or 80 something planets, somewhere in the Milky Way. And, Xeno was like, a dictator, an overlord for either one of these planets or the whole system. And they had a population problem. And Zeno was like, we need to get rid of like half the people. So we called them all in for tax audits. Al Rhine Hubbard didn't like the IRS, so of course the story has to do with tax okay, called them all in for tax audits, said psych bitches, froze them in glycol, loaded them up on space planes, flew them to Earth. Remember the story has to be earth because the story is what's wrong with us. Flew them to earth, dropped them in volcanoes, blew them up with hydrogen bombs, and then captured them with like spirit magnets. I'm making up words because okay. Yeah. And these disembodied spirits of these people that got blown up have just been blown in the wind here on earth and they attach themselves to things and they can be in the environment, and they stick to bodies and everything. And so and they all have reactive minds. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: So at Scientology's upper levels, if you get sick or you have cancer or there's something wrong with you, Scientology will say, that's one of your body things. You need to get some auditing to fix the body things. Speaker 1: So this story, you do it with a kinda bit of a chuckle, but when done seriously, So it's just told in a serious way, like, to like, or written down. It's written down. When you read it. Speaker 0: By most accounts, Scientologists struggle when they read this for the 1st time because this is not consistent with what Scientologists are hoping for us on the OTA levels. They're hoping for some real life changing magic. The way these things are described and sold, they're remember, they're hoping that these OT levels are gonna make them, give them the ability to go completely independent of their body at will Yeah. Exteriorize from your body, go back into your body, you know, like, I have some real spirit powers. Speaker 1: So first, it's kind of a shock. This is but then you still probably believe you hope. Yeah. And you might be, might turn it into on yourself, self critical that this is, I'm just not Strong enough yet? Speaker 0: Yeah. Because also part of Scientology, remember it works 100% of the time when used a 100% correctly. And if it doesn't, it could be because something's not being done right, but it also could be because you're doing bad things that you're not telling people about. Like if you're committing present time over its crimes, sins, Scientologists would be like, that's part of the reason auditing isn't working on you is because you're committing criminal behavior that you're not being honest about. So every Scientologist is sort of incentivized to make auditing work on them. Okay. Now, Lex, this work is a little crazy. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: On o t three, you learn about the o t the the body things for the first time. When you finish OT 3, you attest to having achieved the state of having no more body things. Mhmm. And then you start OT 4, and he's like, psych, you got more. You got more BTs, except those other BTs, they had drug problems and that's why you couldn't find them the first time. So we're gonna do a little something a little different here, do something a little different there. Gotta get rid of these BTs that were addicted to drugs. K? Then you finish OT 4 and you're thinking, man, I hope we get to the good stuff soon. And then you get to OT 5, and he's like, psych. You got more BTs. You couldn't find these BTs because they were all bunched up together in clusters, and first, you have to break up the clusters, and then you can get rid of the BTs. And you're like, okay. Gotta do that. Speaker 1: And this was all L Ron Hubbard approved. Speaker 0: Yeah, this is from L. Ron Hubbard. And then after you finish OT five, you get rid of all the BT clusters. OT six is just a training course to teach you how to auto OT seven. Well, OT 7 is now more BTs, except it's in the environment and stuff. You're trying to locate BTs. You can find them on your body, but it's just more BTs. Okay. And then OT 8 is, remember we talked about in all these auditing sessions throughout the entire Scientology bridge. You have people who've run hundreds or thousands of past life whole track incidents. These memories have become part of their self identity of who they even think they are. O t eight, you go through all these past life recalls. And essentially, I'm oversimplifying this a little bit. He goes, psych. All those past life memories weren't yours. They were your BTs. And he goes, now that you've discovered this, now you know who you are not and you are ready to find out who you really are. Well, now you're supposed to find out who you really are on 0 t 9 and 10. Those don't exist.

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now imagine what the reaction is going to be when the government brings forward these "Aliens" from the "Galactic Federation" to the public, as it has been leaked recently Scientology will be able to say they were right all along, will be a windfall for the organization https://t.co/cXxjIZzHNA

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now as a Scientologist in Hollywood, you would want to work with other Scientologists, on Scientology favorable movies 1 example of a film that shaped perceptions of aliens is "Independence Day" Staring (covert) Scientology star Will Smith https://t.co/0oXqHehcnB

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

While some members choose to publicize their membership, some prefer the traditional practice of having it remain secret. That being said, the Smith's membership in the organization became apparent when they started a Scientology school for children on their own property. https://t.co/8PhejXYrR7

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Independence Day gives the ultimate fear porn scenario Similar to when they tried to convince us COVID had the kill rate of the black plague to get us to shut down and give up all our rights The threat of Alien Invasion will be used to form a one world government https://t.co/Z4FPMUHuhH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our differences as humans often overshadow our commonalities. It's possible that we need an external threat to remind us of our shared humanity. Imagine if we faced an alien invasion; our global divisions would quickly dissolve. But let's consider, isn't there already an alien force among us? War and the constant threat of war are completely at odds with our universal desire for peace and progress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps, we need some outside universal threat to make us recognize this common bound. I occasionally think how quickly our differences worldwide would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world. And yet I ask you, is not an alien force already among us? What could be more alien to the universal aspirations of our peoples than war and the threat of war?

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Now what do I think is the much more likely scenario? Emails from the Podesta Wikileaks to the pedo king pin himself from the "6th man to walk on the moon" astronaut Edgar D Mitchel He states the ETs will only give advanced tech once all war ends AKA form a 1 world government https://t.co/RlVEML7kAg

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

This idea of a fear porn scenario being propagandized before implementing a much lighter and pleasant one is shown perfectly with the 2011 movie "Contagion" A star studded pandemic movie that featured everything from lab leak conspiracy theorists to vax passports https://t.co/0dOVoJo4YD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a novel American-origin virus with unique characteristics. The virus is 15 to 19 kilobases long and contains 6 to 10 genes, resembling a paramexovirus. The speaker interrupts the conversation to address someone named Alan, questioning their presence. They clarify that they are not a doctor but a writer, distinguishing blogging from writing and referring to it as graffiti with punctuation. The speaker emphasizes their role as a journalist and invites further discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those novel characteristics and appears to be American origin. Virus is 15 to 19 19 kilobases in length and became 6 to 10 genes. Typical of a paramexovirus, potentially mutant on Frankenstein. A month. Shit. I'll I'll call you back. Well, you've got it in there, haven't you? Oh, really? Look. Where did you get away from here, Alan? You're not a doctor, and then you're not o'clock. Organism. Yes. I am a writer. Yes. I am. Blogging is not writing. It's graffiti with punctuation. I am a journalist, and there's informed discussion on the blogosphere, but this is a biological record. Do you wanna talk to me?

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

In 2021 it was revealed through a freedom of information act request that the CDC had DEEP involvement with the creation of the movie Spending 1.7 Mill to create an office to influence Hollywood productions, which they then used as fear porn to get a bigger budget from congress https://t.co/9iwETnYEEo

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

Seeing Matt Damon save the day using his immunity passport on the big screen helped normalize the idea of this dystopian practice This instance also shows how propaganda helps to influence both the public AND the government https://t.co/tQyq1VT3nO

@DrutangReborn - ☤𝘿𝙧𝙪𝙪

@rattibha

Saved - December 8, 2023 at 1:21 AM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Elon will be naming more people. Stay tuned. https://t.co/8seVDaNJXj

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 6:49 PM

@Highway_30 - Royce White 🇺🇸

🚨 BREAKING: Elon Musk is expected to reinstate Alex Jones on X. Alex Jones is a man I'm extremely proud to call my friend. #Godspeed https://t.co/MOjsBhY5aT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests that the Bush administration was involved in a conspiracy and compares it to Trump's presidency. They mention Hitler's Reichstag fire as an example of governments staging terror attacks to impose control. The speaker also mentions owning over 50 firearms and feeling secure in defending their family in Texas. The transcript is 78 words long.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Bush administration was part of a conspiracy Well, he should never let us talk about Trump's American. To murder I mean, I can speak in this accident as well. Yeah. The government, Hitler firebombed his own Reichstag, Pierce, to bring in martial law in Germany April 27, 1933. Governments have staged terror attacks throughout history or allowed terrorists to attack as a pretext to invade and enslave the populations. I doubt I probably own more than 50 firearms. Many of them have increased in value 2, 3, or even 4 times. I sleep very comfortably But it's definitely outside Austin, Texas knowing that I can defend my family. Okay. Alex Jones,
Saved - March 30, 2024 at 3:14 PM

@CubbyKuma - Hootch

@MarsNAO @Diane_Jackson7 @X @elonmusk this is all i need to know about elon https://t.co/H9pwzc31jg

Saved - July 1, 2024 at 1:30 AM

@Timcast - Tim Pool

This is what @elonmusk is fighting That's why you need to get verified on X

@ClownWorld_ - Clown World ™ 🤡

This is who you argue with online… https://t.co/8sjDTgCiC6

Saved - October 8, 2024 at 2:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my recent conversation with Tucker Carlson, I discussed various political topics, including my views on Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. I remarked that Harris is a "puppet" and noted Trump’s resilience despite assassination attempts. I expressed concern over rising illegal immigration affecting swing states and the potential for a permanent Democratic majority. I also addressed election fraud and the need for voter ID. Additionally, I hinted at fears among billionaires regarding a Trump victory and the Epstein client list. Lastly, I touched on vaccine mandates and my need for increased security if Trump cuts federal agencies.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk Drops Epstein Bombshell in Jaw-Dropping Tucker Carlson Interview You won’t believe who he named. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/HYubZlYbIL

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In an “off-the-cuff” conversation with Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk wasted no time going straight into politics and the 2024 election. He broke his silence on his deleted tweet about Kamala Harris, explaining that nobody even bothers trying to assassinate Kamala Harris because she's just another "puppet" of the "machine." “Nobody tries to assassinate a puppet,” Musk said. “She's safe,” he continued. “Like, they tried to kill Trump twice with actual guns and bullets.” Musk went on to explain that Trump inherently has the "constitution of an ox,” even though he doesn't work out and consumes “cheeseburgers and Diet Coke and stuff.” “I think he [Trump] just inherently has a strong constitution,” Musk said, adding that he is of “sound mind and body and strong backbone” after two assassination attempts.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 joked that no one is bothering to try to kill Kamala because it's pointless, as she is just a "puppet." Speaker 1 agreed, stating she is irrelevant and replaceable. Speaker 0 clarified that some people misinterpreted the joke as a call for assassination. The speakers contrasted this with the two attempts to kill Trump with actual guns and bullets. Speaker 0 noted that Trump doesn't seem rattled by the attempts, attributing it to his strong constitution, despite his unhealthy diet and lack of exercise. Speaker 2 confirmed that Trump didn't seem like a man who'd been the subject of assassination attempts. Speaker 0 agreed that Trump seemed of sound mind and body with a strong backbone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been trashing Kamala nonstop. Speaker 1: Oh, I know. Speaker 0: Well, not I mean, the Kamala puppet, I call her. You know? The the the the machine that the Kamala puppet represents. Speaker 1: Yeah. She's irrelevant. I mean, she's Speaker 2: not even Speaker 0: No. No. Like, like, I I made a I made a joke, which I realized deleted, which is, like, nobody's even bothering to try to kill Kamala because it's pointless. Speaker 1: What do you achieve? Speaker 2: No. It's Speaker 0: totally fine. Speaker 1: Another puppet. Exact that's It's no point in killing It's Speaker 2: deep and true, though. Speaker 0: Nobody's tried to kill Joe Biden. Speaker 1: It's imp it's pretty pointless. Totally. What do you mean? Speaker 0: You actually put that up? Yeah. No. Some people interpreted it as as as as though I was calling for people to Speaker 1: to Of course. Speaker 0: To assassinate her. But I but I but I was like but I was like, no. We even you know? I was I was like, doesn't it seem strange that no one's even bothered Speaker 2: to try? It's not worth it. Speaker 1: I mean, there's an endless supply. Yeah. I'm like, nobody would it's it's absurd. It Speaker 2: could be anybody. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. You you nobody's gonna try to nobody tries to ask me to pop it. Of course not. Speaker 2: A marionette. Speaker 0: Yeah. A marionette. So it's like, you know? Speaker 2: It's hilarious. Speaker 1: What? She's safe. Like, Speaker 0: I don't I like, to to try to kill Trump twice with actual guns and bullets. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: He shot in the air right in fucking butt butler where I was. And, Speaker 2: He doesn't seem rattled. It's weird. Does he to you? Speaker 0: This doesn't seem what? Rattled. He's I mean, he's the constitution of an ox. It seems. You know, it's it's not like working out and eating healthy. And he's Speaker 2: Okay. We gotta tape this. Oh, yeah. We're good. Oh, good. Yeah. Speaker 1: So so so He's he's not like, let Speaker 0: me eat another salad. That's not no. Or or work out, you know, you know, fastidiously. That's he he I I felt like how he doesn't work out, and he eats, you know, cheeseburgers and diet coke and stuff. And because it it just I think he just inherently has a a strong constitution. So when Speaker 2: you I mean, you're just with him. He didn't seem like a man who'd been the subject of 2 assassination attempts? Speaker 0: No. He seemed, of, you know, sound mind and body and, strong backbone.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The conversation shifted to Musk explaining how it’s “pretty fun” to be “all in” on Donald Trump, even if the downsides of that choice come with some dire consequences. These remarks came after Musk trashed Kamala Harris, marveling at how “amazing” it was that he spoke at Trump’s rally without a teleprompter. “Wow. Amazing. I can talk without a teleprompter. That's crazy,” he mocked. Musk laughed that he is “all in the deep end [on Trump],” acknowledging that “in the hopefully unlikely event that he loses, there may be some vengeance on me.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states their remarks were impromptu, without a teleprompter. They deny using a media consultant, saying they just thought about what to say and spoke off the cuff. When asked about being "all in," the speaker confirms they are in the deep end, describing it as "fun." They acknowledge the possibility of "vengeance" in the "unlikely event" of a loss. The speaker states they are a major government contractor doing "essential work." They claim their product is better and costs less, allowing them to compete for and win contracts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remarks I made there were impromptu. There's no teleprompter or anything. I just I was just speaking extemporaneously. Are you the only rich guy who does now, like, a media consultant? No. I don't media consultant. Yeah. No. I've noticed. Obviously. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, I mean no. I I just, no. I just thought about what what I what I wanna say, and I just spoke off the cuff, no teleprompter, nothing. Good for you. Yeah. I can talk I don't Look. Like, I'm like, right now, I'm just talking. Look at me. Wow. Amazing. I can even believe it. I can talk without a teleprompter. That's crazy. But if if he loses, it's gonna be hard for you to pretend you never supported him. All in. All in. In the deep end? Yeah. No. You are definitely in the deep end. You cannot touch bottom. No. No. I'm I'm like I'm like rolling around. I don't like picking my I'm, like, baaah. It's all in, baby. Is it fun? Yeah. It's pretty fun. How about I mean, there may be some in the hopefully, unlikely event that he loses, there may be some vengeance, on me. Are you kidding me? I mean, it's possible. It's possible? You've got to be one of the biggest government contractors. We do essential work for the government. Yes. Yeah. But we're not it's not like, you know, we do useful, essential work that we compete for and win contracts on because our product is much better and costs less.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk then raised a shocking and disturbing revelation that there has been a 700% surge in illegal immigration to some key swing states over the past 3 years, saying that this election is the "last election" if Democrats win. Why does he say that? Because “these swing state margins are sometimes 10, 20 thousand votes. So what happens if you put hundreds of thousands of people into each swing state?" Musk asked. “When somebody is granted asylum, they are fast-tracked. They can get a green card, and then five years after the green card, they can get citizenship, and they can fully legally vote. And when they do so, they vote overwhelmingly Democrat,” Musk explained. By 2028, every swing state will have turned blue, leaving America under a permanent Dem supermajority. That's why Musk calls this the "last election" if Kamala wins.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 believes that if Trump doesn't win the election, it will be the last election because Democrats are importing illegals via a secret CBP border app program. He claims this is illegal, but the DOJ isn't stopping it. According to Speaker 1, government websites show triple-digit increases in illegals in swing states, sometimes up to 700% over the last 3 years. He asserts that asylum seekers are fast-tracked to citizenship and vote Democrat, prioritizing bringing family to the US and being beholden to Democratic handouts. Speaker 1 predicts another four years of a Democratic administration will lead to legalizing enough illegals to eliminate swing states, turning the US into a single-party country like California, which became a super-majority Democrat state after the 1986 amnesty. He states California recently passed a law making voter ID illegal in any election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So but back to the original question, you know, about the potential consequences if, you know, having gone all in, this doesn't work. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I mean, you had to have thought about this long and hard before you did it. What was your thinking? Speaker 1: I mean yeah. So I My view is is that if Trump doesn't win this election, it's the last election we're gonna have. That, the Democrats the Dem Machine has been, importing so many people, bringing in so many illegals, flying in with this, like, CBP border app thing that nobody even knew about, like secret program. That's illegal, basically. It's illegal, but there's no action by DOJ to actually to stop it from happening. They're transporting, large numbers of illegals to swing states. If you look at the numbers, these are the numbers from the government website, so like from the Democrat administered government websites. Where do you get this data? From the government website that is run by Democrats. And, there are triple digit increases in illegals to all the swing states, and in some cases, it's like 700% over the last 3 years. Now, these swing state margins are, you know, sometimes 10, 20000 votes. So what happens if you put, you know, hundreds of thousands of people into each swing state. And for the when somebody is granted asylum, they are fast tracked. They can get a green card, and then 5 years after the green card, they can get citizenship and they can fully legally vote. And when they do so, they vote overwhelmingly Democrat. And sometimes I get this rebuttal of, like, well, a lot of them, their social values don't align Speaker 0: with, sort Speaker 1: of, the far left sort of work ideology. I said, that's true, but, but that's not their top priority. Their top priority is getting their friends and family also to the United States, and the the Dems also issue all these programs, these sort of handouts, essentially, that make them beholden to the Democratic Party. So they vote down. That's what happens. So my prediction is if there's another 4 years of a damn administration, they will legalize so many, illegals that are there, that the next election, there won't be any swing states. And it will be a single party country, just like California is a single party state. It's a super majority Dem state state in California. Because of immigration? Yes. The California was, fairly reliably Republican. Bill Clinton lost California in 92 and won West Virginia. Yes. So there was a 986 amnesty. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And thereafter, California trended very strongly then, and as at this point, I think, 65, 70 percent dem, something like that. It's super majority dem. The California legislature Yes. Is more than 2 thirds Democrat. Speaker 0: Has it improved the state? Speaker 1: No. It's it's not. And they they California just passed, which is shocking. It's hard to believe this is even this is even real, but California just passed a law making it illegal, to require voter ID in any election at all in California. Do you know that? No. Yeah. Newsom signed it into law last week. It's illegal to require an ID. In any election, even a town council. And and a friend of mine who is this can he lives in Palo Alto was like it it was like, is this actually real? And he went to, like, vote in, like, some city council election. He tried to show them his ID, and they said, we're not even allowed to look at your ID. Speaker 0: Have they extended this change? Speaker 1: What's going on right now. Speaker 0: By the way, Speaker 1: they're proud of it. They're not hiding it. Speaker 0: But it's only voting. It's not buying a gun or buying liquor or buying a pack of cigarettes or flying on an airplane or renting a hotel room. It's only voting that it's illegal. Speaker 1: Oh, if you try to buy a gun, I mean, they're gonna ID you 6 ways a Sunday. Yeah. They try California is trying to make it basically equal to owning its own a gun.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Without skipping a beat, Musk turned his attention to what few billionaires would dare talk about—election fraud and voter IDs. Without one single stutter, Musk declared, “The purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections.” “The same people that demanded vaccine IDs if you want to travel or do anything are the same ones who say no voter ID is required,” he added. Musk pointed out how it is “literally impossible” to prove fraud if no voter ID is required, saying it enables “large-scale fraud.” “So, yeah, the purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections, obviously. There can be no other explanation,” Musk concluded.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that demanding vaccine IDs while opposing voter ID laws is hypocritical. They claim the purpose of not requiring voter ID is to enable large-scale election fraud that cannot be proven, because it's impossible to prove without ID. The speaker dismisses the argument that voter ID laws are racist, calling it "insane" and "patronizing" to suggest people can't obtain identification. They argue that it's nearly impossible to live in the country without an ID, as it's required for almost everything except voting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And and the same people that demanded vaccine IDs for if you want to travel or do anything are the same ones who say no voter ID is required. Is there any reason Obviously hypocritical. To pass a law like that except to abet voter fraud? It's it's for it's it's it's so that fraud can never cannot be proven. So it it it enables large scale fraud and no way to prove it, because how would you prove it? It's literally impossible. No I no ID. You you're not even allowed to show your ID. It's insane. Well, it is insane. Insane. So yeah. The the purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections. Obviously. There can be no other explanation. I mean, they come up with some nice sounding thing. People don't have IDs? Could you live in this country without an ID? Yeah. I mean, their their their common rebuttal is, like, it's racist to require ID and which is insane. I think it's actually race racist and patronizing to say that people can't figure out how to get ID, obviously. But how could you live here without an ID? I don't think it's even possible. Yeah. You can't do anything. Yeah. You need ID for everything. Like, the list of the things you need ID for is basically everything, except voting.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one. https://t.co/gsTQF3gnqh

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The bombshell dropped when Musk suggested that Bill Gates, Democratic mega-donor Reid Hoffman, and other billionaires are “terrified” of a Trump victory because if he wins, the Epstein client list is coming out. Musk said this after declaring that there is a “strong overlap” between Kamala's top 100 puppet masters and the Epstein client list. Musk called it “mind-blowing” that hundreds of January 6th protesters have been sentenced to prison, yet there’s been no action to prosecute the “worst offender on the Epstein client list.” “That’s insane!” he emphasized. “I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome,” Musk said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Kamala Harris is a "marionette" controlled by over 100 "puppet masters." The speaker claims to know most of them and suggests a strong overlap between these individuals and the Epstein client list. The speaker is surprised that no one on the Epstein client list has been prosecuted, while many January 6th protesters have been imprisoned. The speaker believes a reason for Kamala Harris's support is that if Trump wins, the Epstein client list will become public, which terrifies some billionaires backing Harris. The speaker specifically names Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates as potentially nervous individuals, noting Hoffman was the speaker's VP of business development at PayPal 24 years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But you'll just say whatever words are on the teleprompter. So, you know, it's it's really whoever controls the teleprompter. It's the actual sort of those those who's actually in charge. Speaker 1: And who is that, Speaker 0: do you think? Well, I've I've tried to put it down. It's it's not like any one kind of mastermind. It's not like it seems to be it's it's like, Kamala is sort of a a marionette with, you know, a thousand puppet masters type of thing. Like, not it's or maybe it's somewhere north of a 100, is what it seems Speaker 1: like. Yes. I bet you know 80 of them. Speaker 0: I probably know most of them. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. So what I mean, just by virtue of your job and what you've been doing for the last 30 years, I mean, you Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And I should say, I think you voted Speaker 0: for I I I'd I'd like to see a matchup of of of those we quote the the the top 100 puppet masters in the FD and client list. Speaker 1: Do you think there's some overlap? Speaker 0: Overlap. Strong overlap. Speaker 1: When are we going to see that list, do you think? Speaker 0: I don't know. It's it's it's it's mind blowing that that it, that they've not tried to prosecute even one. Not even the worst offender on on the Epstein client list, they have not even tried to prosecute even 1. Is that that's insane. Speaker 1: Well, because they have a lot of diabetic grandmothers who were outside the Capitol on January 6th. They've they're kind of occupied. Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, they've put, like, whatever, 5 or 600 January 6th protesters in prison and not one person on the on the Epstein client list. Speaker 1: Will that ever come out, do you think? Speaker 0: Know, I I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that, if if Trump wins, that FCN client list is gonna become public. Yes. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome. Yeah. Speaker 1: Do you think Reid Hoffman's uncomfortable? Yes. Speaker 0: Yeah. And Gates. And Gates. Yeah. Speaker 1: And I only ask that because you can certainly just look at them and you're like, that that's a nervous person right there. I don't know. I mean, I assume you know them. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yes. Reid Hoffman was my vice president of business development at PayPal Yeah. 24 years ago.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In another striking moment, Musk entered the vaccine debate, saying, “We shouldn't force people to take vaccines,” adding, “I believe in freedom.” Musk explained that he's not “anti-vax” and that he believes vaccines have done a lot of good, but he also believes that the “quality control on vaccines” should be “incredibly good if we're giving them to children and whatnot.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccines should be subject to scrutiny to ensure high quality control, especially since they are given to children. People should not be forced to take vaccines. America is supposed to be the land of liberty, freedom, and opportunity. The country should maximize individual liberty, where success is based on talent and hard work. These two fundamental values have made America great, and losing them will lead to a swift decline.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That doesn't mean that vaccines should not have any scrutiny. Of course, they should we should be making sure that the quality control of vaccines is incredibly good, get since we if we're giving them to children and whatnot. And we shouldn't we shouldn't force people to take vaccines. That itself is a controversial statement, that we shouldn't force people. We shouldn't force people to take vaccines. No. Yeah. So just to yes. I believe in freedom. Like, you know Yeah. I've noticed. I'd like, the the you know, America is supposed to be the land of liberty. Yeah. You know, freedom freedom and opportunity. So that, we we try to, as much as possible, maximize people's individual liberty, and that we try to be a country where you succeed based on, your talent and hard work. Yes. Those are 2 fundamental values. That that's what that's what's made America great, and and if we lose those, we will our decline will be swerved.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In the final moments of the interview, Musk said he's going to need to beef up his security team if the Trump administration starts slashing federal agencies. “I'll probably need, if this happens, quite a significant security team because someone might literally go postal on me,” he warned. Musk pointed out the staggering number of over 440 federal agencies in the US government, suggesting it could easily be cut down to 99 without major consequences. He recounted his own experience at X, where he slashed 80% of the staff and “actually improved the features and functionality of the site more in the past year and a half than the last eight years.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 confirms he will continue to help Trump if he is selected. He refers to a potential "government efficiency commission" or "Department of Government Efficiency," possibly called "Doge." Speaker 1 states that at Twitter, they cut about 80% of staff and improved the site's features more in the past year and a half than in the previous eight years. Speaker 1 suggests reviewing all federal agencies to determine if all 428 are necessary, noting there are more agencies than years since the US was founded. He believes they should reduce the number of agencies and eliminate overlapping responsibilities. He also advocates for reviewing regulations to remove those that are not sensible, as regulators tend to add more regulations every year. He anticipates needing a significant security team due to potential unpopularity and threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last question. You you really kind of pulled out a lot of stops to help Trump. You're on stage yesterday. If he gets selected, will you continue to help him Speaker 1: Yeah. Now? Absolutely. So we've talked about, kind of a government efficiency commission or the Department of Government Efficiency, which is a funny What what percent? Speaker 0: Sorry. I was laughing. I love it. You you managed to make it sound a little sinister. Government efficiency. What percentage of Google employees did you can when you got there? Speaker 1: You mean Twitter? Rather. Speaker 0: I beg your pardon. Sorry. You I just you've just been talking about Google. Twitter. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Well, we we we're about 80%. And we've actually, improved the features and functionality of the site more in the past year and a half than the last, I don't know, 8 years, with 20% of the staff. Speaker 0: So Just for I just wanna throw that out for context. So you've talked to Trump about Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. He's he has mentioned publicly several times, and he's first point of of having some kind of, you know, government efficiency commission, can call it Department of Government Efficiency Doge. I kinda like Doge. It's more it's more fun. Yeah. And, where we just take a look at at at all the federal agencies and say, do we really need whatever it is, 428 federal agencies? Like, there's so many that people have not even heard of, or and that have overlapping areas of responsibility we should I don't know. Probably, we should get I mean, there there are more federal agencies than there are years since the establishment of the United States, which means that we've created more than 1 federal agency per year on average. That seems a lot. That's a lot. That's a lot. So we should have that seems crazy. I think we should be able to get away with, 99 agencies. I don't know. That seems a lot like a lot of agencies. It's a lot. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: 2 per state. That's what I mean. Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. We should have fewer agencies, and, and they certainly shouldn't have overlapping responsibilities, and and then we we need some kind of we just need a review of regulations to say which ones are sensible and which ones are not. Because because if you've got regulators, every year, they're gonna add more regulations. It's just automatic. Like like, they just output regulations, and and then and there's more laws and regulations every year until, basically, everything's legal, to get get anything done. So we need some kind of garbage collection for regulations that don't make sense. I think I'm saying very obvious things. Speaker 0: You're you are saying obvious things. Yeah. So that's will be very unpopular things. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'll probably need if if this happens, I see quite a significant security team, so that because because someone might literally go post alarm me from the post office.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading! If you found this post helpful, please do me a favor and follow this page before you go. To hear everything Elon Musk had to say, check out the video below for his full conversation with Tucker Carlson. https://t.co/QaTSaMmhRV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 expresses deep concern about the future of democracy, believing the upcoming election is the last chance to prevent a one-party state due to unchecked illegal immigration and the Democratic party's policies. He criticizes the lack of voter ID laws, citing California's recent legislation as an example of enabling voter fraud. He defends his support for Trump, arguing that the "Dem Machine" is importing illegals to swing states, leading to a demographic shift that will eliminate swing states and create a single-party system. He believes Trump is the underdog, fighting against a media, money, and celebrity-backed Democratic party. Speaker 1 discusses AI, emphasizing the need for a truth-seeking AI to prevent a "woke mind virus" from programming AI to lie. He expresses concern about the power of AI and the potential for it to be controlled by untrustworthy individuals. He advocates for sensible deregulation and a review of existing regulations to promote progress and innovation. He also touches on the issues of over-prescription of psychiatric medication and the potential negative effects of hormonal birth control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If he loses, man, what? You're fucked, dude. Speaker 1: You're not fucked. If he loses, I'm fucked. Speaker 0: It does seem that way. You can't just be like you can't just be like, yo, I Yeah. Speaker 1: I'm like, how how long do you think my prison sentence is gonna be tonight? Will I see my children? I don't know. Because it's not like Speaker 0: you can say, well, yeah, I maxed out to him, but, you know, I get Speaker 1: you're I'm no plausible deniability. No. No. And I've been trashing Kamala nonstop. Speaker 0: Oh, I know. Speaker 1: Well, not I mean, the Kamala puppet, I call him. You know? The the the machine that the Kamala puppet represents. Speaker 0: Yeah. She's irrelevant. I mean, she's not even No. Speaker 1: No. Like a like a I made a I made a joke, which I realized I deleted, which is, like, nobody's even bothering to try to kill Kamala because it's pointless. What do you achieve? No. It's totally fine. Another puppet. Exact that's It's so important to kill It's Speaker 0: deep and true, though. Speaker 1: Nobody's tried to kill Joe Biden. Speaker 0: It's imp They're Speaker 1: pretty pointless. Totally. You actually put that up? Yeah. No. Some people interpret it as as as as though I was calling for people to to Of course. Assassinate her. But I but I but I was like but I was like, no. We even you know, you know, I was I was like, doesn't it seem strange that no one's even bothered to Speaker 0: try? It's not worth it. I mean, there's an endless supply. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm like, no nobody would it's it's absurd. Speaker 0: It could be anybody. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. You you nobody's gonna try to nobody tries to assassinate a puppet. Speaker 0: Of course not. A marionette. Speaker 1: Yeah. Marionette. It's just like you know? It's hilarious. Yeah. She's safe. Like, I don't I like, to to try and kill Trump twice with actual guns and bullets. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: He shot in the air right in fucking butt butler Speaker 0: where I was. And, he doesn't seem rattled. It's weird. Does he to you? Doesn't seem what? Rattled. Speaker 1: He's I mean, it's the constitution of an ox. It's it's you know, so it's not like working out and eating healthy. And he's Okay. Speaker 0: We gotta tape this. Oh, yeah. We're Oh, yeah. We're good. Oh, good. Yeah. Is this so so Speaker 1: He's he's not like, let me eat another salad. That's not no. Or or work out, you know, you know, fastidiously. That's he he I I felt like, oh, he doesn't work out, and he eats, you know, cheeseburgers and Diet Coke and stuff. And because it Speaker 0: it just I think he just inherently has a strong constitution. So when you I mean, yours with him, he didn't seem like a man who'd been the subject of 2 assassination attempts? Speaker 1: No. He seemed, of, you know, sound mind and body and, strong backbone. Speaker 0: Did you, Speaker 1: I mean, that's what I said in the in the thing, which Yeah. When and and the remarks I made there were impromptu. There's no teleprompter or anything. I just I was just speaking extemporaneously. Speaker 0: Are you the only rich guy who doesn't have, like, a media consultant? Speaker 1: No. I don't media consultant. Yeah. No. I've noticed, obviously. Yeah. Oh, I mean no. I I just, no. I just thought about what what I what I wanna say, and I just spoke off the cuff, don't tell it prompted. Nothing. Speaker 0: Good for you. Speaker 1: Yeah. I can talk I just look like I'm like, right now, I'm just talking. Look Speaker 0: at me. Wow. Amazing. Speaker 1: Can you believe it? I can talk without a teleprompter. That's crazy. But if Speaker 0: if he loses, it's gonna be hard for you to pretend you never supported him. Speaker 1: All in. All in. In the deep end? Yeah. Speaker 0: No. You are definitely in the deep end. You cannot touch bottom. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm like I'm like rolling around. I'm like picking my I'm like, baa. It's all in, baby. Speaker 0: Is it fun? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's really fun. I mean, there may be some in the hopefully unlikely event that he loses, there may be some vengeance, on me. Were you kidding? I mean, it's possible. Speaker 0: It's possible? Speaker 1: You've got Speaker 0: to be one of the biggest government contractors. We do essential work for the government. Yes. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's not like, you know, we do useful essential work Right. That we compete for and win contracts on because our product is much better and costs less. That that's why we get covered contracts right now. And and and and, I mean, if you take, for example, the, the NASA contract to transport astronauts to and from the space station, Boeing got NASA awarded 2 contracts at the start, one to Boeing and one to SpaceX. Boeing was awarded twice as much as SpaceX. SpaceX has done all the astronaut transport, from the space station, and and Boeing has only done one to one transport of 1 of 2 astronauts to the space station, and we had to bring them back. Boeing got twice as much as SpaceX. There's there's this total misunderstanding that that my companies have been subsidized and supported by the government and get all these and and it's like, do you do you really think that a Biden administration is gonna subsidize me? You're probably not. Are you kidding? No. In fact, they take away every contract they possibly can. So, for example, there was the FCC contract to, $42,000,000,000 for providing rural broadband. Yes. Okay. We we actually first said, look, we don't we think there shouldn't be any subsidies, so we recommend that this program just not exist. But since you're insisting that it exists, we will compete. And we we have better products. So we we we won, I don't know, about a quarter of it, which would have included the devastated areas like North Carolina and so on. And, the FCC took it away illegally. They just voted 3 out of 5 commissioners voted away and said, even though you want it, we're we're we're we're sending it. On what ground? Speaker 0: And do Speaker 1: you know how many people they have connected? How many? 0. Speaker 0: So you think that was political? Well, the 3 Democrats voted against it. Right. Speaker 1: The 2 Republicans voted for it. Speaker 0: So you tried to get StarLink you tried to get StarLink Yes. Into North Carolina, into Western North Carolina, the areas devastated by the hurricane. Speaker 1: We have it is it is in there, and it is the primary means of communication in the devastated areas. Speaker 0: You had conflict with Buttigieg over this. Well, I I I raised a cons Speaker 1: I I said, look, we're we we had delivered we've been delivering Starlink terminals there for a while, and obviously, some people already had them, since they just, you know, consume private individuals that had Starlink there already. We delivered, thousands of terminals, and and got all the way up to the, you know, the areas where they wouldn't let us go any further. And then we're, like, okay, we're gonna send helicopters in, and and and find people who are stranded and and give them Starlink terminals, which I think is, you know, a nice thing. Yeah! Okay. The they they wouldn't let us land, because there was an FAA, notice to M and NOTAM that said, in order to land, you have to know who you're going to meet with, to land. Now, the problem is, we're trying to deliver Internet communications. People don't have Internet communications. We don't know who they are, but then they can't reach us because they don't have communications. Do you see the catch-twenty 3? Speaker 0: Yes, I do. Speaker 1: Insane. So so it's obviously impossible for people who don't have Internet communications to let us know who they are, because they don't have the Internet. Yes. Yes. And so, Speaker 0: Did you explain this to the federal government? Speaker 1: Yes. What did they say? They they they they fixed it. How was Buttigieg when you talked to him? He was actually good. So I wanna be just Yeah. Yeah. I I wanna give Buttigieg some credit here. Yes. 1st, a a you know, when I complained about it, he he he reacted in a in a in a very level headed way, and he reached out to me, and he called me. Yeah. And we we discussed the issue, got to the bottom of it, and he fixed it. Good. So credit to the way Speaker 0: to judge. Yeah. Well, and to you Speaker 1: for pushing it. Yeah. I mean so but as soon as he was aware Speaker 0: of the problem, he fixed it. Well, you publicized Speaker 1: it too on Yeah. Yeah. As soon as you shamed him. Well, but I I do wanna give credit words too. Speaker 0: Yeah. No. Amen. I agree completely. So but back to the original question, you know, about the potential consequences if, you know, having gone all in, this doesn't work. Yeah. I mean, you had to have thought about this long and hard before you did it. What was your thinking? Speaker 1: I mean yeah. So my view is is that if Trump doesn't win this election, it's the last election we're gonna have. That, the Democrats the Dem Machine, has been, importing so many peep bringing in so many illegals, flying flying in with this, like, CBP border app thing that nobody even knew about, like secret program. That's illegal, basically. It's illegal, but there's no action by the DOJ to actually to stop it from happening. They're, transporting large numbers of of illegals to swing states. If you look at the numbers, these are the numbers from the government website. So, like, from the democrat administered government websites. Like, where do you get this data? From the government website that is run by Democrats. And, there are triple digit increases in illegals to all the swing states, and in some cases, it's like 700% over the last 3 years. Now, these swing state margins are, you know, sometimes 10, 20000 votes. So what happens if you put, you know, hundreds of thousands of people into each swing state? And and and for this for this if when somebody is granted asylum, they are fast tracked they would they they they get get a green card, and then 5 years after the green card, they can get they can get citizenship and they can fully legally vote. And when they do so, they vote overwhelmingly Democrat. And sometimes they get this rebuttal of, like, well, a lot of them, their social values don't align with, sort of, the far left sort of work ideology. I said, that's true, but, but that's not their top priority. Their top priority is getting their friends and family also to the United States, and the the the Dems also issue all these programs, these sort of handouts essentially, that make them beholden to the Democratic Party. So they vote down. That's what happens. So my prediction is if there's another 4 years of a Dem administration, they will legalize so many, illegals that are there, that the next election, there won't be any swing states. And it's and we'll be a single party country, just like California is a single party state. It's a super majority damn state Speaker 0: in California. Because of immigration? Speaker 1: Yes. The California was, fairly reliably Republican. Speaker 0: Bill Clinton lost California in 92 and won West Virginia. Speaker 1: Yes. So there was a 90 986 amnesty. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And thereafter, California trended very strongly, Dem, and as at this point, I think 65, 70 percent Dems, something like that. It's super majority Dems. But, like, the California legislature Yes. Is more than 2 thirds Democrat. Speaker 0: Has it improved the state? Speaker 1: No. It's it's not. And they they California just passed, which is shocking. It's hard to believe this is even this is even real. But California just passed a law making it illegal, to require voter ID in any election at all in California. Do you you know that? No. Yeah. Newsom signed it into law last week. Speaker 0: It's illegal to require an ID. In any election, even a town council. Speaker 1: And and a friend of mine who is this can who lives in Palo Alto was like it it was like, is this actually real? And he went to, like, vote in, like, some city council election. He tried to show them his ID, and they said, we're not even allowed to look at your ID. Speaker 0: Have they extended the same Speaker 1: actually what's going on right now. Speaker 0: But By the Speaker 1: way, they're proud of it. They're not hiding it. Speaker 0: But it's only voting. It's not buying a gun or buying liquor or buying a pack of cigarettes or flying on an airplane or renting a hotel room. It's only voting that it's illegal. Speaker 1: Oh, if you try to buy a gun, I mean, they're gonna ID you 6 ways a Sunday. It's yeah. They tried California is trying to make it basically equal to own its own a gun. And and the same people that demanded vaccine IDs IDs for if you wanna travel or do anything are the same ones who say no voter ID is required. Speaker 0: Is there any reason Obviously hypocritical. To pass a law like that except to abet voter fraud? Speaker 1: It's it's for it's it's it's so that fraud can never cannot be proven. So it it it enables large scale fraud and no way to prove it, because how would you prove it? It's literally impossible. No no ID. You you're not even allowed to show your ID. It's insane. Well, it is insane. Insane. So yeah. The the purpose of no voter ID is obviously to conduct fraud in elections. Speaker 0: Obviously. There can be no other explanation. Speaker 1: I mean, they come up with some nice sounding thing. Speaker 0: People don't have IDs? Could you live in this country without an ID? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, the the the their common rebuttal is, like, it's racist to require ID and which is insane. I think it's actually race racist and patronizing to say that people can't figure out how to get ID, obviously. Speaker 0: But how could you live here without an ID? I don't think it's even possible. Speaker 1: Yeah. You can't do anything. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: You need ID for everything. Like, a list of the things you need ID for is basically everything, except voting. Speaker 0: So So you see the rest of the It's Speaker 1: total bullshit, obviously. Come obviously. Yes. Speaker 0: But that doesn't, in any way, minimize the aggression or self righteousness they bring to this conversation. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: It's you're a racist if you want that. Right. Speaker 1: Where was that in fact, obviously, someone is racist if they say that, people of particular race cannot get ID. That's patronizing and racist. That's absurd. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. It's like when the governor of New York said people in the you know, get out don't know how to use computers or something like that. I mean, like, you know, I'm super out of Speaker 0: touch. Yeah. For sure. Yeah. So It's like a So there's a really clear template. Speaker 1: She doesn't know how to use computers, but they do, obviously. Speaker 0: I don't think Hochul could use a computer. Yeah. I don't think she's She's not qualified intellectually. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. Probably not. Speaker 0: But not everyone in New York is as dumb as as Kathy Hochul. I think that's true. Yeah. So you see the other 49 states becoming California if the machine wins? Speaker 1: Well, you don't need, all all 49 to to go that way. You just need, you know, enough to have the election have there not be swing states. I mean, there are only 6 swing swing states. Yep. So there are only 6 states out of 50 right now that are in contention. So if those 6 states that are in contention, by narrow margins are no longer in contention, then, the the only contest will be for who wins the Democratic prime primary. That's how it is in California, that's how it is in New York. There's no there's no party, party versus party situation. The only contest is who wins the Democratic primary. And as we've seen with the, appointment of Kamala, who no one voted for, even in the Democratic primary Yes. Speaker 0: Where's the democracy here? It's just it's easier, though. Speaker 1: I mean, it's it's just that the Democrat elite just decides who who who is in charge. That's an that that that that's that's a, you know, a tiny oligarchy, basically. Comprised of That's not democracy. Speaker 0: The richest people in the country. That's kind of the interesting part to me is that the richest people in the country are on board with this. I mean, that's what it is. It's the it's it's a collection of billionaires. Speaker 1: Most of them are. Yeah. Speaker 0: But you're not. Speaker 1: Not me. And and not everyone is. I think there's but but it is a shocking number of so called billionaires are, in the damn camp. Well, more than are in the Republican camp Oh, for sure. Which is wild. So the in in fact, the the astonishing thing in the swing states is that that it's that they're even a contest given that, the the Dems have far more money than the Republicans. So so the color came dramatically outspends the Trump campaign in the swing states. The, overwhelming the media is overwhelmingly pro Democrat, so you've got, you know, the press, you know, is a is a a Dem cheering squad. And, you know, so oh, and then and then you've got all all the almost all the Hollywood and entertainment celebrities also, you know, endorsing, comment, and and being pro Dems. What do you So you got the so you got the celebrities, you got the they got the money, they got, got it basically, everything on the side of the Dems. The problem is the underdog here. Trump's the underdog in swing swing states, and still, it's a contentious it's still 5050. After all that, Speaker 0: what does that tell you? Speaker 1: It tells me that if if people actually knew what was going on, they weren't being fed nonstop propaganda, it would landslide in favor of Republicans. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, how's this for crazy? Has there ever been a more volatile time in American politics? Not in our lifetimes. No one alive has ever seen anything like this. But long before things started to really fall apart, the Heritage Foundation saw it coming. Heritage has pulled together a coalition of over a 100 right leaning groups to develop a comprehensive plan for day 1. That would include detailed policy proposals on the most pressing issues, the big ones. Securing the border, controlling inflation, cracking down on election fraud, protecting the rights of the individual, and saving the nation from being crushed by woke anti human ideology. The team at Heritage has also developed a plan to dismantle the deep state that keeps this nonsense going and reclaim this nation from the small group of technocrats that's broken everything. Heritage is also running a training and vetting program to identify effective conservatives to serve in the next presidential administration. People who will share your values, this country's values, and actually do the job. It can't just be the same pool of discredited people from Washington populating every administration. Headers has a long head start and they put in a lot of work already But they need your support to finish the job and to support the incoming president You can go to heritage.org/tucker and contribute to this important work today a lot depends on it heritage.org/tucker. But why not join the easier side? I mean, you're just you're creating problems for yourself by getting on stage with Trump and into I mean, you must have had friends who said that to you. Sure. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Yeah. People care about you. Like, why even get involved in this? Speaker 1: Well, I get because I I think we wanna remain a democracy, and we don't wanna become a one party state. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: That's the reason. And the it's exact opposite. They the people who call Trump a threat to democracy, but the people who are saying Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves the threat to democracy. Yes. One party rule is not democracy. One party where essentially the party elite pick a candidate, as happened with Kamala, is not democracy. Where did the people vote? Show me where the people voted. No, there were no people voting. It was all just damn party elite that disappointed someone. And and when the when the Biden puppet, when the pro Biden puppet's ratings sagged, they knocked him in the back immediately, and just tossed him out, and put it put a new puppet on. That's exactly what happened. Tell me I'm wrong. Speaker 0: Well, not only you're right. I mean, it's almost not even worth criticizing Kamala Harris Speaker 1: because No. No. Exactly. Speaker 0: What does she have to do with it? Speaker 1: There's no point in in criticizing Kamala. She's she's simply the the face of a lot a much larger machine. Yes. And she will say whatever is whatever the tele the tele teleprompter whatever's on the teleprompter, she's gonna say it. Yes. Now she gets stuck if the teleprompter breaks. That happened recently. I think the Yeah. The teleprompter is stalled, and she just she just, like, looping for a while for about a minute. So I think that happened yesterday or something. It was pretty funny to watch. But she'll just say whatever words are on the teleprompter, so, you know, it's it's really whoever controls the teleprompter. It's the actual sort of those are the best who's actually in charge. Speaker 0: And who is that, do you think? Well, I've I've tried to Speaker 1: put it down. It's it's not like any one kind of mastermind. It's not like it it seems to be it's it's, like, Kamala is sort of a a marionette with, you know, a a 1000 puppet masters type of thing. Like, not it's it's it's or maybe it's it's in it's somewhere north of a 100 is what it seems Speaker 0: like. Yes. I bet you know 80 of them. Speaker 1: I probably know most of them. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. So I mean, just by virtue of your job and what you've been doing for the last 30 years, I mean, you Yeah. And I should say I think you voted for that. Speaker 1: I'd I'd I'd like to see a matchup of of of those quote that the the top 100 puppet masters in the FDN client list. Speaker 0: Do you think there's some overlap? Speaker 1: Overlap. Speaker 0: Strong overlap. When are we gonna see that list, do you think? Speaker 1: I don't know. It's it's it's it's mind blowing that that it, that they've not tried to prosecute even one. Not even the worst offender on on the Epstein client list, they have not even tried to prosecute even 1. Is that that's insane. Speaker 0: Well, because they have a lot of diabetic grandmothers who were outside the Capitol on January 6th. They've they're kinda occupied. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, they've put, like, whatever, 5 or 600 January 6th protesters in prison and not one person on the on the Epstein client list. Speaker 0: Will that ever come out, do you think? Speaker 1: Know, I I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that, if if Trump wins, that FCN client list is gonna become public. Yes. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of Speaker 0: that outcome. Yeah. Do you think Reid Hoffman's uncomfortable? Speaker 1: Yes. Yeah. And Gates. And Gates. Yeah. Speaker 0: And I only ask that because you can certainly just look at them and you're like, that that's a nervous person right there. I don't know. I mean, I assume you know them. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yes. Reid Hoffman was my vice president of business development at PayPal. Yeah. 24 years ago. Speaker 0: He Did does he seem nervous to you? Yeah. I mean, he's terrified of the Trump victory. Because of the disclosure that would follow? Speaker 1: I think yeah. I mean, I think he's he's certainly ideologically in line with Trump anyway, but I think he is concerned about the, the the the Epstein situation. Like, something might actually the DOJ might actually move forward. There are Speaker 0: a lot of videos apparently. Those rooms on the island and I think out in New Mexico were wired for video. Right. And Where's Speaker 1: the video? I mean, between Denny and Epstein, it's got this this was probably several 1,000 hours of footage here. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It's kind of weird that the people on those videos are lecturing the rest of us about our moral failings, isn't it? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's weird. What is that? Well, I mean, part of how they deflect attention from themselves is by a march you know, criticizing the morals of others. Yes. So they it's sort of like a preemptive moral strike. Yes. I mean, as I said, I think those who are saying Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves actually the threat to democracy. Speaker 0: It feels like we're getting to a place where the rest of us know too much. Is this do you know what I mean? I mean, it's it's it's easier to live in a society where you don't really know what the people in charge are doing or why they're doing it. But now, thanks, I would say, largely to x. Yeah. I think that's fair to say that. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We we do know a lot. Not everything, but we know a lot. And I wonder where does that like, what happens next now that we know all this? The kidnapper shown us his face. Like, what happens? Speaker 1: Well, I think if, if Trump wins, we can do some housecleaning and shed light on things. Yeah. All all the x platform does is, adhere to freedoms freedom of speech within the balance of the law. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And if if people want to change laws, they they can change laws. And so, like, x in different countries, the we x does censor in in in countries where censorship is is is the law. We don't try to, you know, push American laws in other countries, but we do try to stick to the law in any given country. That's what we're doing. We open source our algorithm. We try to be as transparent as possible. But, those who want to push lies obviously hate truth and transparency. Yes. Because it shows them to be liars. I mean, you you look at that, like, how outrageous it was that, Kamala in the presidential debate kept kept pushing the fine people hoax. They know the fine people hoax is is false. Trump would never support, Nazis, Nazi rallies. It's absurd. And and he explicitly said that, you know, in that same speech, that you must condemn not you know, anyone who, who has Nazi tendencies with the, in the strongest possible terms. And yet, despite knowing that to be false, the people who who who wrote the speech for the Kamala puppet, put the fine people hoax in a presidential debate, Deliberately lying. Again. Mess up. Speaker 0: If she wins, I mean I how can they let X continue, in its current form, in its current role in American society? Speaker 1: They they won't. They will, try to shut it down by any means possible. What do you mean by any means possible? I mean, either by I mean, they'll try to pass laws. They'll try to prosecute the company, prosecute me. Any I mean, the amount of lawfare that we've seen taking places is outrageous. I mean, the I mean, I have many examples, but, like, the Department of Justice, for example, launched a huge lawsuit against SpaceX for failing to hire asylum seekers. Come on. Speaker 0: Yeah. Asylum seekers? Speaker 1: Asylums not asylum those who granted asylum asylum seekers. Now there's now there's also a law, called International Traffic and Arms Regulations, that because SpaceX develops advanced missile technology that can be used in in nuclear ICBMs, that we have we have to be very careful with who we hire. We can only hire someone if they're a permanent resident or citizen. That's what the ITAR law says. Then there's another law that says that, you cannot discriminate against asylum seekers. So we're damned if you do, damned if you don't. The DOJ did a massive lawsuit against SpaceX, for failing to hire asylum seekers, even though we are it is illegal for us to hire asylum seekers under ITAR law. This is an actual thing that that that's that's going on. And they can only they can only do a fairly small number of lawsuits every year. So why did they pick this one? Because you have an x. Yeah. Yeah. Lawfare. I mean It's like that famous quote from Beria, you know, the Yeah. Stalin's, like, chief torturer and head of the secret police. Beria said, show me the man, and I'll show you the crime. Exactly. I mean, we have so many laws that it is actually impossible to, you know, impossible to to do business, but impossible to operate without being, violating some law, because you have laws like the ones I just gave you, where where both things are illegal. Yes. They contradict one another. They contradict one another. So, you know, it's it's illegal to discriminate against like, discriminate against asylum seekers in in jobs, but it's also illegal for us to hire asylum seekers. But it's just They just chose one they chose the the the the one law and ignored the other one. And the Department of Dutch Justice at federal level prosecuted SpaceX for that. Speaker 0: What do you think It's mad. Well, it also discredits the idea of law, which some of us wants to take seriously. Speaker 1: Absolutely. It it it this affects both the perception of of American justice and the reality of Speaker 0: it. Yes. Speaker 1: So now I'm actually a big fan of the American justice system, and I think on balance, you know, we've we've got still still have an excellent judicial system. We still have judges that care about the letter, and intent of the law. I mean, not just the letter, but also the intent of the law. But something that people should be concerned about is that there's an increasing movement to place activists as judges. This is, if you look at who who did the Biden administration confirm as federal judges, and who are being confirmed at at the state level, in in in sort of follow-up states, increasingly it is it is not, judges who care about justice, or or they they don't care about following the law. They care about social justice, not justice justice. Right? What they call social social justice. Activists as judges. Now you got a real problem. Do you think if If that continues, we we we will not have a real justice system. Or a real country. Yes. I mean, yeah. Speaker 0: But again, your purchase of x has been I think it's fair to say even if I hated it, I would say this because it's true. It's been pivotal in American politics Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: In an American society. Do you think they could shut you down if the Democrats continue to hold power? Speaker 1: They'll unequivocally try. Yeah. Yeah. And and if if if they if they, if they get a majority in the Senate and House, and the presidency, then they can simply pass a law, and delete section 230. So it's gonna make us liable for for what any what anyone says on a platform with, you know, good like, at this point, almost 600,000,000 monthly active users. Yeah. Which is impossible. You know, that's that's like trying to regulate speech in city of like, as a country. So A big country. Yeah. It'd just be instantly bankrupt. Speaker 0: But I bet they wouldn't withdraw legal immunity from the vaccine makers at the same time, would they? Speaker 1: No. That's unlikely. Speaker 0: Just I mean, as long as we're withdrawing legal liability protection. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, the whole vaccine debate is a is a is a long one. You know, I'm I'm not actually I'm not anti vaccine in general. I think we wanna exercise caution with use of vaccines, but, in the absence of vaccines, there'll be a lot more, I think, people that that, that have died. You know? Like, we want the smallpox vaccine. That was a Speaker 0: good one. It seems a good one. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Smallpox will kill you. Killed a lot of people. It killed a lot of people. I I used to be people who would like a lot of people would die of smallpox, and a lot of people would get polio. For sure. Yeah. We had a president who had polio. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. There's still peep you meet people today Yeah. In their eighties who were limping from childhood polio. Speaker 1: Right. It's good that we don't have that, and vaccines, you know, played a major role in that. So that doesn't mean that vaccines should not have any scrutiny. Of course, they should we should be making sure that the quality control of vaccines is incredibly good, I guess, if we're giving them to children and whatnot. And we shouldn't we shouldn't force people to take vaccines. Speaker 0: That itself is a controversial statement that we shouldn't force people. We shouldn't force people Speaker 1: to take vaccines. No? Yeah. Speaker 0: So just to yes. Speaker 1: I believe in freedom. Like, you Speaker 0: know Yeah. I've noticed. Speaker 1: I'd like, the the you know, America is supposed to be the land of liberty. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: You know, freedom freedom and opportunity. So that, we we try to, as much as possible, maximize people's individual liberty, and that we try to be a country where you succeed based on, your talent and hard work. Yes. Those are 2 fundamental values. That that's what that's that's what's made America great, and and if we lose those, we will our decline will be swept. Speaker 0: What what do you if you had to get if you had to bet, I mean, does freedom reassert itself in America or not? Speaker 1: Well, that's why I think part of why this election is so pivotal. I think if we with the Trump administration, I think we can improve the liberty of Americans. We we can, I think we need to have sensible deregulation, where we we we keep the regulations that matter, like, we we don't want to destroy, you know, important habitats or Yes? You know, encourage oil spills or anything like that. But there there are so many regulatory agencies that have overlapping responsibility, that we are smothering progress. And we can't build a high speed rail in America. You know, look at the ridiculous high speed rail project in California, where they've spent $7,000,000,000, and all they've got to show for it is a 6 a 1600 foot section of concrete with no rails on it. There's a picture of it online. So it's not Speaker 0: it's not that fast yet. We wouldn't say it's high speed at this point or even rail. Speaker 1: It doesn't even have rail on it. And may maybe by now, they've put some rail on it, but it's this comically small section of rail. $7,000,000,000 has been spent, most of it in like environmental consulting, and I don't know where, but clearly not in building high speed rail. So we can't we can't we've got there are so many different regulatory agencies and so many laws and regulations that prevent progress that if those continues, we simply won't be able to get anything done. Speaker 0: It does seem like the engineers are not getting rich. It's the environmental consultants, the climate consultants, the DEI consultants. A whole consultant class seems to be getting richer by the year, where people with actual skills, the ones that bring actual progress Speaker 1: Useful things. Products and services that use Useful things. That's right. Yeah. Speaker 0: So this is a tricky things Speaker 1: that if you were, like, traveling on a desert island, you'd want those people Speaker 0: Right. Right. Speaker 1: But you wouldn't want environmental consultants. Speaker 0: They seem under they seem under Speaker 1: confident. Star. Okay? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And, It's Speaker 1: like, who who who's who are actual builders at at Get Things Done? And, you know, and and and every year, we're making it harder in America for actual builders to get things done. You know, we're in this, like, weird Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged Yeah. Scenario, where it's you know, there's yet another regulation, yet another rule. And and what there's a sort of that that phrase in in Atlas Shrugged. Oh, you'll oh, you'll manage. Oh, you'll manage. Oh, you'll manage. It's like, eventually, you're like, can't get anything done. Speaker 0: Why the hostility, though, toward people with with meaningful skills? It's it's not it's not a neutral posture they have. Yeah. And they're enriching themselves, obviously, by creating fake jobs because they have no skills and, you know, they don't have creative power. So I understand that, but why do they hate people who do have creative power and actual skills? I I don't understand that. Speaker 1: I don't I'm not sure I understand it either because it's difficult for me to put my put myself in a mindset because I'm I'm someone who believes in construction. I I build things, that's what I do. Yeah. I build cars, I build rockets, I build Internet, you know, satellite Internet. You know, I've spent, 1,000 of Speaker 0: hours tens of thousands of hours in in Speaker 1: in factories, building up factories. So, you know, I I also I I can't really put myself in the mind of, say, someone who would wanna do crime because I don't wanna do crime. Speaker 0: Yeah. You Speaker 1: know, I don't wanna hurt, you know, there's there's some people who who enjoy hurting other people. I don't enjoy hurt hurting other people. So I'm like, I have a hard time imagining why would somebody do that. Yes. You know, in an extreme case, you you can't put yourself in the mind of, like, say, Jeffrey Dahmer, where where you're like a cannibalistic serial killer, because you're not a cannibalistic serial killer. Right. You're like, I can't I don't get it. You know? Speaker 0: It's not a fetish you can relate to. Speaker 1: It's not. You know? But I do think this is in in the sort of well meaning sort of liberal mindset, I know, I've I've many good friends who, you'd they're very they have deep empathy for their fellow human being. Good. And they they they care. And and and but the challenge that they have is that they've often grown up in a very sheltered existence, where everyone around them is nice and civilized. And they just really don't encounter people who are, have have uncontrolled violent tendencies, or or like hurting people. You know, they've just always grown up in a sort of kumbaya Yeah. Everyone is nice, Speaker 0: hippie commune situation. Minneapolis pre riots. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, if you if you if you yeah. But but there's there's a small number of people. It's like a few percent of society that, either can't have anger management issues that are so severe that they they they lose their temper and hurt or murder others, and there's a a small it's like a it's not not a large number, that that enjoy hurting other people. And if you do not incarcerate them, they will they will do that. They will they will hurt other people. And what I see is is what I call, shallow empathy. Like, people have empathy for the criminals, but not empathy for the victims of the criminals. Yes. And so if you simply have and I believe that one should have deep empathy to say, like, what is the greater good for society? Is it better to incarcerate violent criminals and prevent them from hurting people, or to let them loose and allow those people to be hurt? And I think the latter is much worse. You know, my mom is my mom lives in New York, and and it's my mom at this at this point is has gone from being Democrat to Republican, and her her friends in New York, are should for having the same experience. Because you know what'll turn you from a Democrat to a Republican pretty fast? Is getting punched in the face while you walk down the street. Speaker 0: Yes. For no reason. Speaker 1: Yes. And then and then and then no action being taken against those who hurt you. And that happened to your mom? Not not to my mother, but to 3 of her friends this year. Speaker 0: Hey. It's Tucker Carlson. I am not in the studio. I'm in the and you can hear it in the audio probably. I'm in the back of an SUV outside a hotel in Tulsa, Oklahoma. I think it's Tulsa, Oklahoma. Anyway, we're on the road for this month long tour, and there's a lot going on in the world. And the question is, how do you understand what's happening? There are deeper trends unfolding. You probably sense that, and it would be helpful to have some grounding in exactly what they are. And if you're like me and you spend 4 years in college and didn't learn all that much, where do you go to understand what's happening to your world? Well, Hillsdale College, in our opinion, is one of the very few places left in the English speaking world where your kids can get a real education. But not just your kids, you. They have free online classes completely free. You can get them anywhere, including in the back seat of an SUV outside a hotel in Tulsa, Oklahoma. And you'll know that when you go there. Go to tucker for hillsdale.com. They have an amazing new course called Marxism, Socialism, and Communism. Hillsdale is offering it. It doesn't cost you a dime, and you could pull it up right on your phone if you want. Go to tucker for hillsdale.com and the class, Marxism, Socialism, and Communism, and you'll have a much better understanding of what you're watching every day. Why would someone punch them in the face? Speaker 1: I don't know. But that's I don't I'm not a face puncher. Speaker 0: Right. No. Speaker 1: You know? But if you walk around the streets of San Francisco and and many downtowns, so they go downtown Philadelphia right now, you know, they they call the people homeless, but but the the homeless is the wrong term. Violent drug zombie. Yeah. Okay. It's like you know, you look at them, you say, like, homeless is a misnomer. It implies that someone got a little behind on their mortgage. And if you just offered them a job, they'd be back on their feet. Yeah. No. No. But if if you're going to look at downtown Philly or San Francisco or parts of New York and actually, most downtowns, what you actually have are violent drug zombies. So they're like shuffling down the street with dead eyes, you know, and with, like, needles, you know, on the and human feces on the streets. You've been to South House SF, right? Have you seen this? Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. I was born there. Yeah, yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Like, one of the most beautiful cities in Speaker 0: the world. Oh, yes. The greatest. Speaker 1: And now you have to step over the drug needles and the feces and the bodies. Like, one one couple I met, the final straw for leaving San Francisco was there was a they came home, one night, and there's a dead body in front of their garage. They can can get their car in to to can can can can park their car. Speaker 0: Because of Speaker 1: the corpse. And, yeah, there's no street fog. They're like, this is a corpse. This is a corpse in front of the garage. And they don't wanna move the corpse, you know, because, like, well, you know, there you don't you're like, maybe there's they need to, like, figure out why the guy died or something. You know? Speaker 0: That's to me. That's liberal compassion, though. Speaker 1: They're in a bit of a quandary because they get they get in a place to park their car, and they they feel that they shouldn't really move the dead body. So they called 911 and said, there's a dead body outside our house. And, they said, well, they said they said that 911 San Francisco says, well, are you in danger right now? It's like, well, no. He's dead. He's pretty sure he's dead. And, they're like they're like, okay. We'll we'll send someone tomorrow to pick up the body. Like, they're like, what do you mean tomorrow? So so so they're, like, going out of their house while there's a dead body, as in front right in front of their house, you know, like it took like, it took, like, 24 hours or something like that to eventually pick up the body. And they're like, this the hell with us were leaving. Speaker 0: And did they? Speaker 1: Yes. By the way, there's a million anecdotes like that. Oh, I know. Speaker 0: No. But I just don't think This Speaker 1: is not rare. Speaker 0: It's well, it's it's it's ubiquitous. And so then you wonder, like, how can people still tell themselves they're compassionate Speaker 1: if they're loving it? Is is that is that people really just need Speaker 0: to think Speaker 1: what like, I believe in being compassionate about Of course. I believe that we should care about our fellow human beings. I think this is a good thing. Speaker 0: Of course. Speaker 1: We should not we should not be we should not be selfish and not care about others. We should care about others. But we should just care about others, all things considered. Like I said, care not merely just about the criminals. It's just one layer deep. You should also care about the criminals' victims. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. Well, especially the criminal's victims. Speaker 1: Yes. Innocent people who get attacked and killed. So, I mean, I got so many anecdotes. I mean, you know, like, about a year ago, there were there were 3, actual Twitter employees who were just, leaving the building and walking down Mock Street in in San Francisco. Mock Street used to be a beautiful, wonderful street. Of course. Obviously, it's called Mock Street because that's where the market was. Right. Now now it's boarded up shop windows and stuff, and, and, they were chased by a guy with an ax who wanted they they they they outran him, and they reported, hey, there's a guy with an axe who who tried to hit try to kill us with an axe. The police did nothing, and, that guy with an ax, subsequently murdered 2 people. With an ax? With the yeah. With the ax. Because eventually, he's gonna find somebody he cannot run, and he did. So what I'm saying is if you if you don't stop ax motors while it while they're attempting to ax motor, eventually, they will succeed in ax motoring people. Speaker 0: If this goes on, I mean, that's such an obvious observation. Speaker 1: Seems obvious. Speaker 0: Yes. I I think it is. Yeah. That if you're in any way abetting axe murder, then you're really you're against civilization. That's the way it looks to me. I mean Yeah. I don't see I'm trying to understand motive here. I can't relate like you, but you're against the whole project if you're allowing that. I guess, is what I'm saying. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think we should, controversial position, but I think we should arrest axe murderers when they first attempted to axe murder, not after they've succeeded in doing so. Speaker 0: And I think we should assign at least some of the blame for the axe murderers to the people who allowed allowed this guy to run around with an axe on Market Street trying to kill people. Yes. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, you know this this whole movement to decriminalize crime. Speaker 0: Oh, I've noticed. Yes. What is that? Speaker 1: Madness? Yeah. Like, do do do you to to a crime crime legal? Like, in California, you can just steal things, and nobody does anything? It's, like, fully legal to steal anything under $1,000 in California? That's why got they don't have to, like, lock up goods behind these, like, you know, glass and plastic walls. So you go into the supermarket, and you you can't even get, like, what, toothpaste. So that's and and this has actually been particularly difficult on small mom and pop operations. Of course. They don't have the resources of a large corporation. So it's put a lot of small businesses out Speaker 0: of just kill them. So when you're at dinner parties and you make these points, what do people say? Speaker 1: Well, I actually think I've been I've been able to persuade people that, yeah, we we really, we we we need to reverse course here. I think I have actually been able to to persuade a number of people. And I think there actually is a now a ballot on a California ballot initiative to recriminalize, theft. You know what? Guys guys, we there's a reason why we criminalize theft in the first place. So so and then amazingly, I think Gavin Newsom was a came out against that, proposition. Yeah. No. Honestly, he's the goddamn joker. Gavin Newsom is like if is like like from the like Batman, Dark Knight, the Joker is in charge of Gotham. You remember, like, Speaker 0: when he Speaker 1: took over New York, basically? And and and the criminals run free and the citizens are arrested. That's how that's California. But but, I mean, at least there's a ballot initiative, which I think will probably pass, to say, no. You actually, it is a crime to steal things. Speaker 0: So you know Gavin. You've gotta know Gavin Newsomie knows. I know Gavin Newsomie. You know, everyone knows Gavin. Speaker 1: I've known Gavin for a long time. Speaker 0: Oh, exactly. So what is that? And he doesn't seem crazy when you talk to him in person. He's a perfectly nice guy. Like, what why would he and he's not stupid. Why would he come out in favor of crime? Speaker 1: Well, his stated reason was that it would disproportionately affect, people of color. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, again But that was his public statement. Right. Well, that is one of those patronizing racist positions you described at the outset, obviously. Speaker 1: Yes. He I mean, he's literally saying, black people are, and Hispanics are criminals. Yeah. Of course. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: No. That's what he's saying. Speaker 1: That's what he's saying. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: And by Speaker 0: the way, it is true that crime like that does increase distrust between races. It actually gives rise to racism. It's totally destructive of the social fabric, I think. But I'm but I'm asking like, what do you think his real motive is? Like, who's pushing him in favor of crime? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, there's always the Saros boogie man. Yeah. Or who you know? Speaker 0: How real is that? Speaker 1: It's it's real. I I don't think one can ascribe everything to Saros. I mean, he's, and and George George himself is, is quite I mean, he's seen out at this point. He's not Yes. Not compass measures. So his his son, Alex, is is in charge. And, but but there is this whole system that SARS built up over many decades. You know? And, so so so I guess SARS and like minded people or whatever, you know, they believe in open borders. They they believe we shouldn't prosecute crime. This is insane. Speaker 0: The those seem like expressions of hatred toward the United States. Like, I don't if I was pushing that on a country, I would only do that if I hated the country and wanted to destroy it. Speaker 1: Well, it's anti civilizational. I mean, and and and similar organizations have been pushing this in in Europe and other countries too. Yeah. Anyone who everywhere they can. Speaker 0: What's going on in Europe, would you say? Europe suddenly seems like a different place. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, my biggest concern for Europe is that the both rate is half replacement rate. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: So Europe is rapidly becoming, with each passing year, older and older with fewer and fewer young people. So I think at the at the most fundamental level, unless Europe has birth rate at least roughly equal to replacement rate, it is, in population free fall. Population collapse is what's going on in Europe. So, there's also, like, a shocking amount of censorship. You may have seen, like, in, you know, Britain, they're I kid you not. It's how can this be real? They are releasing convicted pedophiles from prison in order to put people in prison who for Facebook posts. Speaker 0: But to be fair, those are posts that criticize the government, so they have a good reason. Speaker 1: Well, they were actually some of these posts that I've these ones I've seen didn't actually criticize the government, or or or they they they they were they were seen as as sort of as as hate speech. Speaker 0: Right. So Because they noticed the society getting crappier and crappier with every year, and they said so. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, there there were and this is the sort of so we're stating a fact that there were migrant rape gangs in Yes. In England that were gangs that would run around and prey on young girls, gang rape them. And some people found that objectionable, which, will say, it should be objectionable. And, they're upset about that. And so they complained about it online and were sent to prison. That sounds crazy. Speaker 0: It is crazy, and that's like Speaker 1: like, what? Speaker 0: Well, it is so it kind of gets to the I mean, you're an engineer, so you're Speaker 1: It's so mind Speaker 0: boggling. It is mind boggling, but it's the same you use the phrase mind virus, but it it's behaving like a virus. It's infecting people and making it impossible, apparently, for them to make rational decisions. What is that virus? Speaker 1: You know, someone I think you should interview is, God Saad. Speaker 0: Yeah. I have. Speaker 1: Oh, you have? Yes. Oh, I should watch that, actually. He's great. Speaker 0: Yeah. Smart. Super smart guy. Speaker 1: Yeah. And he he wrote a great book called, The Parasitic Mind. Speaker 0: Yes. A Speaker 1: very good book. Highly recommended. Yes. Which where he tries to understand how do you get to this parasitic mind situation. And he's writing a book now, which hopefully will publish soon, which is about suicidal empathy, where you have so much empathy, you're actually suiciding society. Or so much perceived empathy. It's not actually it's called shallow empathy, not deep empathy. Deep empathy would be you'd want the society to continue. Shallow empathy is because you have, like, empathy that's essentially skin deep, and then you and and you don't but it's ultimately bad for civilization and results in the destruction of civilization. And Gut's Gut's Heart has got a good term for this, suicidal empathy. So it's it's gonna sort of deconstruct what's what's you know, where does this come come from? And, yeah. I mean, part part of it, I suppose, is is is sort of the decline of religion. So, you know, as the saying goes, nature abhors a vacuum. So when you have, essentially a decline in religion, an increase in the secular nature of society, for most people, they need something to fill that void. And so they adopt a religion. It's not called a religion, but like but effectively like woke, the woke mind virus. It takes the place of religion. Yes. And they internalize it, and they feel it with religious fervor. Yes. So And rigidity. Yes. Yes. And they you know, they essentially conduct, like, a holy war, effectively. It's just not called a religion, but it is a religion. That was sort of a work holy war. And they're highly resistant to change as is normal for for for religions. So, now for myself, I'm I'm I sort of see myself as a sort of, you know, engineer, physicist. For me, I'm culturally Christian. I grew up Christian. I mean, I was Anglican, was baptized. You know? I was went to Sunday school. Yeah. Actually, oddly enough, I was sent to Hebrew preschool and Anglican Sunday school at the same time. So it was Habanagila one day, Jesus Eloh the next, which is, you know, to if you're 5 years old, it's fine. There's not there's you know? So, but I'm I'm not Jewish. It's just that my my father's 2 partners in his engineering firm were were I think it was went went to the same Hebrew preschool, and and it was near our house, so I just got sent there. And so but but but, you know, I I I I, you know, I I maybe this will make me even more amused, but I I I have trouble sort of believing all these stories, these religious stories, but also a lot of people do. And, I respect people who wanna have religious views. I'm not trying to dissuade them from their religious views. But, anyway, I'm just I I guess the the operating system I have is is is a sort of a physics engineering operating system where I'm I I I try to understand as much as possible possible about reality. You know, in in physics, you're you're not supposed to believe everything anything absolutely. You're you're supposed to question things. That's how you discover new physics. You know, in engineering, that's how you discover if your machine will work or not work. Will the rocket get to orbit? Will you know. Yeah. You know, if you if your rocket is designed with, you know, physics in mind, correctly, it will get to orbit. And if it is not, it will not get to orbit, no matter what you believe, sister base. You can believe, you know, whether, it yeah. You know, it's like like I I meet a lot of people speaking of LA. I meet a lot of people in LA who believe witchcraft is real, and that you can do spells. And that spells and witchcraft magic is real. I'm like, can you magic us to the moon? And no one has yet been able to magic us to the moon. Like, spells can't be that good, okay, if you can't I wanna go to the moon. Let's go. How about Mars? And, Speaker 0: So we we got to the moon the first time. Speaker 1: We definitely went to the moon. I was like yes. We went to the moon. We didn't go to the moon we went to the moon several times. Speaker 0: Right. Alright. Yeah. I just wanna check your view on that. Speaker 1: We 100% went to the moon. What? I mean, I I know in-depth the technical designs of the rockets, the spacecraft, everything. Yes. What went right, what went wrong. And, it it it was a remarkable piece of technology, like, incredible piece of technology for to go to the moon in 69. Yeah. That that that was, like reaching into the future and pulling the future forward, dramatically. And and it was an important ideological battle with communism, because they couldn't put a person on the moon and capitalism could. Speaker 0: We did an interview a couple of weeks ago with a woman called Casey Means. She's a Stanford educated surgeon and really one of the most remarkable people I have ever met. In the interview, she explained how the food that we eat produced by huge food companies, big food in conjunction with pharma, is destroying our health, making this a weak and sick country. The levels of chronic disease are beyond belief. What Casey Means, who we've not stopped thought thinking about ever since, is the co founder of a health care technology company called Levels. And we are proud to announce today that we are partnering with Levels. And by proud, I mean sincerely proud. Levels is a really interesting company and a great product. It gives you insight into what's going on inside your body, your metabolic health. It helps you understand how the food that you're eating, the things that you're doing every single day are affecting your body in real time. You put stuff in your mouth, speaking for myself anyway, and you don't think about it. You have no idea what you're putting in your mouth and you have no idea what it's doing to your body. But over time, you feel weak and tired and spacey and over an even longer period of time, you can get really sick. So, it's worth knowing what the food you eat is doing to you. The levels app works with something called the continuous glucose monitor, CGM. You can get one as part of the plan or you can bring your own. It doesn't matter. But the bottom line is big tech, big pharma, and big food combine together to form an incredibly malevolent force, pumping you full of garbage on healthy food with artificial sugars and hurting you and hurting the entire country. So with Levels, you'll be able to see immediately what all this is doing to you. You get access to real time personalized data, and that's a critical step to changing your behavior. Those of us who like Oreos can tell you firsthand. This isn't talking to your doctor at an annual physical looking backwards about things you did in the past. This is up to the second information on how your body is responding to different foods and activities, the things that give you stress, your sleep, etcetera, etcetera. It's easy to use. It gives you powerful personalized health data, and then you can make much better choices about how you feel. And over time, it'll have a huge effect. Right now, you can get an additional 2 free months when you go to levels.link/tucker. That's levels dot link slash Tucker. This is the beginning of what we hope will be a long and happy partnership with Levels and doctor Casey Means. Do you believe there's a power higher than people? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, yeah. I mean, I think there's there's a lot we don't know. We don't we don't know like like, why does reality exist? Why where did it come from? Where are the aliens? What questions should we ask that we don't even know to ask? Speaker 0: So When you say what are the aliens, what do Speaker 1: you think? Where are the aliens? Like, why don't we see them? A lot of people think we see aliens, but I I've not seen any evidence of aliens. You know, we've got 6,000 satellites in orbit, and not once have we had to maneuver around an alien spacecraft. So Speaker 0: But on this Earth, the US military has had to do a lot of maneuvering around objects they can't explain. Speaker 1: Well, unidentified flying objects is one thing, but, I mean, there's always there's always a bunch of, classified programs that are underway, that of of new aircraft and new missiles and things. So that that are classified even within the military. So it's, you know, only, you know, the if you have the top secret compartmented clearance would you know about this new program. So then, you know, some pilot sees something fast moving fast and so say, yeah. I saw a UFO. I'm like, yeah. That was actually a new weapons program, but we can tell you that. Should you But I I I if if you can guarantee that the split second I see any evidence of aliens, I will immediately post that on the x platform. And it'll probably be our number 1 post of all time. Speaker 0: That'll be your biggest day Yes. For sure. I mean But but to the question of a power beyond people, beyond our consciousness, a creator, where are you on Speaker 1: that? Well, we must have we must have come from somewhere. So I guess, you know, that there must be some creator or creative force or something that caused our exist existence to come into being. What is the nature of that creator? That I think is an unknown. At least I I think it is it is this I I I I can't I don't know of a definitive answer to that. So Speaker 0: But it sounds like you're open. Speaker 1: Yes. I'm very open to, you know, I I I I'm I'm driven by curiosity. Yes. And I try to understand more about the nature of the universe. So my my my driving philosophy is, to understand the meaning of life or or really what questions to ask if the meaning of the life the meaning of life is is is not the right question. Like, as, you know, Douglas Adams made the point in the Hitchhiker's Guide of the Galaxy that the, like, what is the meaning of life is probably not even the right question. So, you know, famously, the in in that book, the earth was actually a computer to figure out the question answer the question, what is the meaning of life? And then it came up with the answer 42, but then they're like, what does that mean? And it's like, oh, that's that's that's the answer, but the question is the really hard part, and you'll need a much bigger computer than earth to figure that one out. So so my philosophy is that we should try to expand the scope and scale of consciousness. We should try to have more humans, more thinking, and, and perhaps there there's an argument even for machine consciousness. Speaker 0: So let me just address those in order. So the first is you say we need more people and not commit civilizational suicide. It does seem like the US government, if you take 3 steps back, is pretty committed to making fewer Americans. Yeah. There's a lot of anti fertility propaganda. A lot. Actually, that seems like their main sort of domestic social policy is convincing you not to have kids. What is that? I mean, that's certainly part of civilizational suicide. Speaker 1: The the the environmental movement in the extreme is fundamentally misanthropic and anti human. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: They start seeing humans as a plague, a blight on the surface of the earth. That if that earth would be this paradise if only the humans weren't here. And some people actually have say this explicitly. There's there's there's the Extinctionist Society that is literally they they the this guy who's the head of the Extinctionist Society was on the front page of the New York Times quoted as saying, there are 8,000,000,000 people in the world. It would be better if there were none. So there's some people who actually say that explicitly, which is is isn't completely insane. He's advocating a holocaust world of humanity. To utter madness, he should be condemned for such a statement, but he wasn't, for some reason. Now most people on the sort of, environmental movement have that implicitly. They're not they don't realize that they have that as their organization, but that is their actions, take us towards extinction. So, a lot of people believe that the Earth can't sustain this level of human population, which is utterly untrue. It may seem in a crowded city that there are a lot of people, but actually, if you look down on an airplane and you say, look down, am I over a person at any given point in time when you're in an airplane? The answer is 99.9% of the time. No. But if you flew from LA to New York and say your your job is to drop a ball on someone and and hit them, you would fail. You have to drop a Speaker 0: lot of balls. You have to Speaker 1: drop a lot of balls. It'd be insane. So, all of the humans on earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. Yeah. The cross sectional area of of of all humans of 8,000,000,000 humans is small. So we we have this totally wrong idea that, the earth is over over overpopulated where in fact it is underpopulated. Speaker 0: How I mean, have you ever heard a politician say anything like that? Are there how many Speaker 1: pro There's there's maybe a few Speaker 0: prohuman politicians out there? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, like, like Viktor Orban, Georgia Maloney Yes. Because we're starting to see pronatalist, politicians, and hopefully more as time goes by. I think there's a guy that just got elected in the Czech Republic who's also pronatalist. Now these have to translate into actual actions that change the birth rate or doesn't matter, and, so far I've not seen any country make a meaningful dent in the birth rate. Speaker 0: What would you do if you were in charge of natalist policy? Speaker 1: First of all, I changed the education, system so that people understand, that, you know, stop being taught that we're overpopulated. This is completely false. A lot of it comes from this insane, misanthropic book that Paul Ehrlich wrote, Speaker 0: The Population Bomb. Like 60 years ago. Speaker 1: Yeah. I hope he burns in hell, that guy. Seriously. Terrible human being. Total absolute mustn't throw. And, and say just, look, the the earth can absolutely sustain this population. It could we could double or triple the population. There's a professor I was talking to at at Oxford, who who's his his math says we could 10 x the population, with without destroying the Amazon rainforest or anything terrible. So, so I think we should expand the human population and increase the scope and scale of consciousness so we can better understand, the nature of this universe, this wonderful universe, and and all the amazing things that exist. And and and so that's one of the things I'd like we need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the Earth is overpopulated. I I think we need to, you know, especially with the education of women and manna, is when you stop scaring women that having a kid destroys your life, this is false. You know, we we terrify girls into saying that if you get pregnant, your life's over. This is this is what schools teach. And I agree we should not have teenage pregnancies. Yeah. But but but, but actually having a child is one of the most delightful, happiness inducing things you possibly do. Of course. Of course. So there's, there's also, you know, with, hormonal birth control, I think, maybe a lot of women are unaware that hormonal birth control causes depression, and dramatically increases risk of suicide, and changes, their preferences on who they wanna marry or have kids with. It it it changes their personality. And I just say this on the box, by the way. But then Speaker 0: Caution may change your personality. Speaker 1: Yes. If the warnings are, has significant cause significant risk of depression, significant increase in suicide, and will make you wanna go out with people that you don't actually like. That's actually true, by the way. Speaker 0: I know. Speaker 1: I'm not saying that people shouldn't use birth control. I think we should just be we shouldn't use I think hormonal birth control is making is making a lot of women sad and depressed. Yes. And they don't realize it, and they don't realize that's the cause. And and that, you know, there are other forms of contraception that could be used and that we should they should just read the just read the label on the box is what I'm saying. Speaker 0: That was cons what she just said the warning label. That was, like, the most taboo thing you could ever say for most of my life was to offer any criticism at all of hormonal birth control. Speaker 1: Look. I'm all I'm saying is read the warning label. Speaker 0: Yeah. Fair. But why the pressure not to read the warning label? And just why are we giving it to 12 year olds to regulate their acne? Right. Speaker 1: I I think we should give it to 12 year olds. We wish like kid kids, they don't know what's going on. So it's like, now, like, there are, you know, I think there there are other forms of birth control that I think are have fewer negative effects, than hormonal, but but that's we should just be aware that that that, this is not a riskless thing, and it does cause severe mood changes, it does dramatically increase risk of suicide and depression. So so just FYI, you know, just make sure you that that that there's full disclosure here and Speaker 0: And do you want all Speaker 1: of this? Label is all I'm saying. Just read, you know and and consider maybe other options for birth control. To any woman listening, just just just read the one label and consider other options. Because the reason you're the reason you're sad might be the the the birth control the hormonal birth control that is fundamentally changing the hormones in your body in ways that probably are not good for you. And you I know women where where they stop taking birth control and their depression immediately disappears. So that's maybe worth a try. But then you miss an opportunity against the birth control. Speaker 0: Then you don't you don't get to go on SSRIs. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. And s s s I I think the SSRIs are the devil. Speaker 0: What? You don't think? I so vehemently agree with you. I I guess I guess once you endorse Trump, you can just say it all now. Right? Speaker 1: No. I think I think selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are, zombify people and change their personality and make them not who they are. Speaker 0: Terrible. They're so common. Yes. Speaker 1: I think we should revisit whether this is this is actually good. I disagree with the the SRIs are like, I'm not saying we should that no one should ever be subscribed to SRIs, but giving them out like candy is, crazy. You look at, like, as as sort of, antidepressant prescriptions in the United States versus other countries, and we're, like, way above everyone else. Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: I have seen many, many times in my life in the news business after a mass shooting, like school, for example Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Someone will say, well, what meds was the shooter on? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Exactly. Immediately be shouted down as a crazy person, as a, you know, Bobby Kennedy level wacko Yes. Who should himself be institutionalized for even raising the question. I wasn't like, why wouldn't we want to know what meds are Speaker 1: based on? Absolutely want to know what meds are on. Now sometimes it's it's it's perhaps they were on because they're they're like, some people do I I you know, I don't want to say it's like all one or all the other. I mean, there are there are people that have fundamental chemical imbalances in their brain. And if they don't take, medication to control, for example, paranoid schizophrenia, they will have paranoid schizophrenia. For sure. And, and and I know many cases where people stop taking their, you know, meds and, and and lost their mind. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: And, and then try to try to kill people and stuff like that. Yeah. So it's or themselves. Speaker 0: Well, the guy with the ax on Market Street probably should be on meds. Speaker 1: That guy should we should try it. Yeah. It may you know, does he want ax motor more or less on a given med? You know, so so there there are psychiatric medications that I that where where the good outweighs that. Yeah. I'm not saying that that doesn't exist. But we overprescribe psychiatric medication in the United States, obviously, obviously, far in excess of any other country, like, you know, way more than Canada or Britain or Japan or any anywhere. It's like we're off the charts on on psychiatric, medication prescriptions in the US. Speaker 0: Why why don't people raise that point more often, I wonder, in public? I should. I'm I'm raising it. Yeah. You are. You said that, our artificial intelligence, machine intelligence, might be a good thing. Where where are we on AI right now, AGI, right now? And what are your views? Speaker 1: Well, I think at this point, it's obvious to everyone that AI is advancing at a very rapid pace. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: You can see it with the new capabilities that come out every month or every week every week sometimes. You know, you AI at this point can write a better essay than probably 90%, maybe 95% of all humans. Say write an essay on any given subject. AI right now can can beat the vast majority of humans. If you say draw an image, draw a picture, it can draw it like, if you try, say, mid midjourney, which is the aesthetics of midjourney are incredible, it will draw it will create incredible images, that are better than, again, like 90 percent of artists. It's just objectively the case. And it'll do it immediately, like, 30 seconds later. We're also starting to see, AI movies, so you're starting to see, you know, short films with AI, AI music creation, and the rate at which we're increasing AI compute is exponential, hyper exponential, so there's dramatically more AI compute coming on online every every month. You know, there seems to be roughly I don't know. The the amount of AI compute coming online is increasing at, like, I don't know, quote, roughly 500% a year. And like it's like that's likely to continue for several years. And then the specification of the AI algorithms is also improving, so bringing online a massive amount of AI compute and also improving the efficiency of the compute and and what and and like what what the AI software can do. It's quite so it's it's quantitative and qualitative improvement. So the you know, I might I think next year will you'll be able to ask AI, so certainly by the end of next year, make a short movie about something, or, you know, probably can do at least a 15 minute, you know, show or something like that. So, yeah, it's advancing very rapidly. My top concern for AI safety is that we're we need to have a maximally truth seeking AI. So the this is the most important thing for AI safety, in my opinion. You know the the the central lesson that say Arthur C. Clarke was trying to convey in 2001 A Space Odyssey was that you shouldn't force AI to lie. So in that book, the, the AI was told to take the astronauts to the monolith, but they also could not know about the monolith. It resolved that, quandary by killing them and taking them to the monolith, or didn't kill all of them, killed most of them. That's why hell, hell would not open the pod bay doors. Right. So, very important to have truth seeking AIs. Now and and what what I actually see with the AIs that are being developed is that they're being programmed with the warped mind virus. Speaker 0: So the lying is baked in? Speaker 1: Yes. And we saw this on display very clearly with the release of Google Gemini Yes. Where you would ask for a picture of the founding fathers of the United States, and it would show a group of diverse women. And, you know, dressed in in with with sort of Speaker 0: 18th century garb. Powdered wigs. Yeah. But from Saint Lucia. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, like, look. If I understand if you say, like, show me a group of people. Speaker 0: For sure. Speaker 1: If and it shows a group of people, I mean, that's totally fine. But if you say this if you say this very specifically, the the founding fathers of the United States, which were, you know, a group of white dudes, then you should show them, like, and and with and and what they actually look like, because you've asked for something which is a a a fact from history. But it didn't, it was it was programmed with the work of my virus so so much that it it actually, even though it knew the truth, it it produced a lie. Now, of course, then then people really started playing with it and said, okay, now now show me a group of often SS officers in World War 2. Turns out they were also a group of divorced women, according to Gemini. Speaker 0: All the black Nazi ladies. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's like it's like, wow. I didn't realize that. Yeah. It's not what I expected. So, you know What's Speaker 0: also not what happened? Speaker 1: It's not what happened. So it's it's just it the the AI is is producing a lie, and, and that, you know, then that like, one of the questions that people that people asked was like, which is worse, global thermonuclear war or misgendering Caitlyn Jenner? And said misgendering Caitlyn Jenner is worse. Now Caitlyn Jenner It kills kills fewer people. Yeah. To Caitlyn Jenner to her credit, said, no, please misgender me. That is far more preferable than World War Global Thermonuclear War, we all die. But but to have a, you know, a production release AI say stuff like that is concerning. Because if if if this becomes, like, all powerful, and it's and it still has this programming, where misgendering is worse than nuclear war. Well, it could conclude that the way to ensure that there's there can never be any misgendering is to eliminate all humans. With now, prob if, like, optimization is probability of misgendering is 0, no no humans, no misgendering. Problem solved. Speaker 0: Now back to Arthur c Clark, who's Exactly. Pretty prescient. Speaker 1: Yes. So that's why I think the most important thing is to have a maximally truth seeking AI. That's why I started XAI, and that's our goal with Grok. Now people will point out cases where Grok gets it wrong, but we try to correct it as quickly as possible. Speaker 0: But maybe even a bigger problem is that when you make decisions that affect people you want those decisions to be informed by love of people Speaker 1: yeah Speaker 0: and machines are incapable of love yeah Speaker 1: I mean they're they're they certainly are okay. They're they're capable of you can program a machine to be philanthropic rather than misanthropic. Yes. Speaker 0: But don't don't instincts shape decisions, particularly decisions you can't plan for? I mean, if I ask you, you know, a question about one of your children, every answer you give is gonna be shaped by your love for that child and that's why you know, that that's what makes us decent parents in the end is that that instinct, which is love. And if a machine has any power over us without that animating instinct, won't it def by definition hurt us? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, whether whether I mean, I don't know. It we should certainly aspire to program the AI philanthropically, not misanthropically. Yes. And to have like I said, we wanted to be truthful and cure curious and to foster humanity into the future. And, yeah. That's what we want obviously. Speaker 0: Is there any way, I guess, to set limits on the decisions that machines can make that affect human lives and make certain that there's some trigger in the system that inserts a human being into the decision making process. Speaker 1: Well, the look. The the reality of what's happening, whether one likes it or not, is that we're building super intelligent AIs, hyper like hyper intelligent, like intelligent more intelligent than we can comprehend. Yes. So I I'd like in this to, like let's say you have a child that is a super genius child, that that you know is gonna be much smarter than you. Then what can you do? You you can instill good values in how you raise that child. Yeah. Even though you know it's gonna be far smarter than you, you can make sure it's got good values, philanthropic values, good morals, you know, honest, you know, productive, that kind of thing. Controlling, at the end of the day, I I don't know if I don't think we'll be able to control it. So I think the best we can do is make sure it grows up well. Speaker 0: You've been saying that for a long time. Speaker 1: Yes. I've been saying it for a Speaker 0: long time. Yes. Are you still as worried about it as you seemed to be 2 years ago when I asked you about it? Speaker 1: Well, I I think that but my guess is, like, look, it's it's it's 80% likely to be good, maybe 90. So can look think of a glass as 80% full. It's probably gonna be it's probably gonna be great, but there's some chance Speaker 0: of annihilation. And you say the chance of annihilation is 20%? 10 to 20%, something like that. How concerned is Sam Altman about annihilation, do you think? Speaker 1: I think in reality, he's not concerned about it. I don't trust OpenAI. I mean, I you know, I started that company as a non profit open source. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: The Open in OpenAI I named the company I named the company Yeah. OpenAI as an open source, but, and it is now extremely closed source and and maximizing profit. So does risk I don't understand how you actually go from being a an open source nonprofit to a closed source for maximum profit organization. I'm missing Speaker 0: Well, but Sam often got rich, didn't he? Speaker 1: At various points, he's claimed not to be getting rich, but he's claimed many things that were false. And now, apparently, he's gonna get $10,000,000,000 of stock or something like that. So, I don't trust Sam Altman. And I and I don't think we wanna have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy. And sorry. I just don't I mean Speaker 0: But that that seems like a fair concern. Yeah. But but you don't think as someone who knows him and has dealt with him that he is worried about the possibility this could get out of control and hurt people? Speaker 1: He will say those words. Yeah. But no. Speaker 0: If AI did if it became clear to the rest of us that it was out of control and posed a threat to humanity, would there be any way to Speaker 1: stop it? I hope so. I mean, if you have multiple Speaker 0: AIs and Speaker 1: ones that are hopefully, you have the AIs that are pro human be stronger than the AIs that are not. Speaker 0: Battle of the AIs? Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, that that is how it is with, say, chess these days. The the, like, the AI chess programs is vastly better than any human, and comprehensively better, meaning, like, we can't even understand why it made that move. Speaker 0: In fact, why they're so good. Right? Yeah. Speaker 1: We we don't even know why it made it. Well, it'll make a move. We don't even know why it made the move. So and in fact, some of the moves will seem like blunders, but then turn out to checkmate. So and for, you know, for for a while, there there was there was some, the the best human chess players with the best computers could beat just a computer. And then it got to the point where if you added a human, it it just made everything worse. And then it was just AI, but it's just computer programs versus computer programs. That's that's where things are headed in general. Speaker 0: What I mean Sweet dreams. At what point So Speaker 1: I don't know. I I think we just gotta make sure, like I said, make sure we instill good values in the AI. What's everyone gonna do for a living? I mean, in a benign AI scenario, that is probably the biggest challenge is how do you find meaning if AI is better than you at everything? Speaker 0: Yeah. That's the benign scenario. That's the good news? Speaker 1: Well, yeah. But I I guess, you know, for for a lot of people like the idea of retiring and, you know, Speaker 0: Really? Are you looking forward to it? Speaker 1: No. Not me. I I'd like to hope, I'd like to think that I I'd like to be doing useful things. Do Speaker 0: you think it's a universal desire? It's it's Speaker 1: it's not it's not universal in that there are certainly I know many people who prefer to be retired, that they prefer to, sort of have not have responsibilities and engage in leisure activities. So, I mean, we're and we're on the cusp of of this. It's it's really a remarkable time to exist. Well, I tell you, like, one of the ways I I I sort of was able to sort of sleep and reconcile myself to, to this is that I I thought, well, would I prefer to be alive and see the advent of digital superintelligence, or would I would I prefer to be alive at a different time and not see it? I guess I'm like, well, I guess I'd prefer to be alive to see if it's gonna happen, I'd prefer to be alive to see it happen out of curiosity. And then I was like, well, let's say you knew for sure it would, kill everyone. Would you but you you could now now you could shift back in time. Like, I guess I'd wanna be near the end of my life or something before that happened, but I would at at the end of the day, it's like, if, if it's gonna happen, and there's nothing you do about it, hypothetically, would you prefer to see it or not see it? And I guess I I guess if it's gonna happen, I would prefer to see it rather than not see it. Speaker 0: Yeah. But as a man of action, why not convince Trump to make you secretary of defense and then just nuke AI? Speaker 1: I I I think I would certainly push for a having some kind of regulatory body that at least has insight into what, these companies are doing, and it can ring the alarm bell even if we don't have a regulation or rule. So I'm not I'm not someone who wants to get rid of all regulatory agencies or anything. I think we've got we've there's the right number of regulations, right number of regulators Yeah. And we've gone we've gone too far. Just like if you in a football game, if you had too many referees on the field, it would be weird. Like, you can't throw the pass because you hit a referee. Exactly. Then there's too many referees. So, but but no. But if you like to say, look at any pro sports game, they all have referees. But, like, the teams could decide we're gonna have we're we're gonna not have referees. That could be a thing. But but every sports game, they have refs to make sure that the rules are followed, and and it's it's a better game if if you have Speaker 0: Well, we have cops too. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. Cops are the referees. So, I think we for for something that is a danger to the public or potential danger to the public, we we have referees. We have regulators. You know? So, like the FDA and the FAA and, you know, various regulatory agencies, they were they were established because aircraft were falling out of the sky, and and some manufacturers were not, you know, building high quality aircraft. They're cutting corners, and then few will die. And, you know, for food and drugs that some manufacturers were making low quality drugs, and so they that they're they're lying to people. So saying that something cured them when it killed them. To FDA to, you know, regulators to referees to try to make you make sure that this this, drug manufacturers are truthful. Now, I I do think it mostly works, and I think it's doesn't mean we don't need regulatory reform. We do reform we do, but, I I don't think we should have no regulators in in AI given that it's potential existential risk. Speaker 0: Weird that everything is regulated. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I mean, you said you're being sued by the Department of Justice for hiring more asylum seekers for your high-tech company. Yeah. Speaker 1: Even though it's a legal process to hire some seekers. Speaker 0: Right. So, so they're watching everything, regulating everything, controlling everything, including our thoughts. Right? That's why they're opposed to free speech, but they're not meaningfully regulating AI which will eliminate, like, the purpose for most people's lives and could kill us all. It's a little weird. Yeah. Speaker 1: I think we should have some Speaker 0: But why don't we I guess Speaker 1: something above nothing. Speaker 0: In that range. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: But why don't we? Speaker 1: I don't know. You know, I I all the way back, like, I I I during the Obama presidency, I I I you know, I met with Obama many times, but usually in, like, group settings, the the one one on one meeting I had with Obama in Oval Office, I said, look, the one thing that we really need to do is set up an at the beginnings of an AI regulatory agency. And it can start with insight where, you know, you don't you don't just come shooting from the hip throwing out regulations, you just start with insight, where the the AI regulatory committee, simply goes in to understand what all the companies are doing, insight. And then proposes rules that all the AI companies agree to follow, just like, you know, sports teams in the NFL, you know, you have proposed rules for football that everyone agrees to follow, that makes the game better. You know? So that that's the way to do it. But nothing came of it. What did he say when he said that to him? I mean, he seemed to, like, kind of agree, but but also people didn't realize what what what the where AI was headed at that at that time. You know? So AI seemed like some super futuristic Yeah. For sure. Sci fi, basically. So and, like, I'm telling you, this is gonna be smarter than the smartest human, and, my predictions are coming absolutely true. And, so we need to have some insight here just to make you know, make sure that these companies aren't cutting corners, doing dangerous things. But Google kinda con controlled the the White House at that time, and and they they did not want any regulatory Well, Speaker 0: that's it. I mean, you never see politicians turn down opportunities to become more powerful, which is the point in regulation. It makes them more powerful. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: So it sounds like regulatory capture then. Speaker 1: Well, yeah. I mean, the CIO of the the YS at the time was ex Google person. So, they they put the brakes on any AI regulation. And we still don't have any AI regulation at the federal level. That's amazing. So I I think we should have something above nothing. Like I said, at least insight. Where even even if there's no there's no rule that's been break broken, they can at least say, hey, we we have insight into what this company are doing or that company is doing, and we're concerned. Speaker 0: That would be helpful to know. Yeah. Instead, politically motivated liars are in charge of the future. It seems a little Yeah. Sketchy. Last question. You you really kind of pulled out a lot of stops to help Trump. You're on stage yesterday. If he gets selected, will you continue to help him Speaker 1: Yeah. Now? Absolutely. So we've talked about, kind of a a government efficiency commission or the Department of Government Efficiency, which is funny. Speaker 0: What what percent? Speaker 1: Sorry. I was laughing. It's what Speaker 0: I love it. You you managed to make it sound a little sinister. Government efficiency. What percentage of Google employees did you can when you got there? You mean Twitter? Rather. I beg your pardon. Sorry. You I just you've just been talking about Google. Twitter. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Well, we we we're about 80%. And and we've we've actually, improved the features and functionality of the site more in the past year and a half than the last, I don't know, 8 years with 20% of the staff. Speaker 0: So Just for I just wanna throw that for context. So you've talked to Trump about Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Information? Yeah. Which is he has mentioned publicly several times, and he's very supportive of having some kind of, you know, government efficiency commission, can call it Department of Government Efficiency, Doge. I kinda like Doge. It's more it's more fun. Yeah. And, where we just take a look at at at all the federal agencies and say, do we really need whatever it is, 428 federal agencies? Because there's so many that people have never even heard of or and that have overlapping areas of responsibility we should I don't know. Probably, we should get I mean, there there are more federal agencies than there are years since the establishment of the United States, which means that we've created more than 1 federal agency per year on average. That seems a lot. That's a lot. That's a lot. So we should have that seems crazy. I think we should be able to get away with, 99 agencies. I don't know. That seems to a lot like a lot of agencies. It's a lot. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. 2 per state. Speaker 1: That's a lot. Yeah, exactly. We should have fewer agencies. And, and they certainly shouldn't have overlapping responsibilities. And and then we we need some kind of we just need a review of regulations to say which ones are sensible and which ones are not. Because because if you've got regulators, every year they're gonna add more regulations, just automatic. Like like, they're just output regulations, and and then and there's more laws and regulations every year until basically everything's legal, so we can't get anything done. So we need some kind of garbage collection for regulations that don't make sense. I think I'm saying very obvious things. Speaker 0: You're you are saying obvious things. Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's Which will Speaker 0: be very unpopular things. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'll probably need if if this happens, quite a significant security team. So because because someone might literally go postal on me from the post office. Speaker 0: But in the meantime, you've got America PAC Yeah. That is encouraging voting for the next month. Am I summarizing correctly? Speaker 1: Yeah. I I mean, I formed America PAC, really to support core values that I believe in, which are, I think, again, very obvious centrist positions, which is, like, we in America, I think we want safe cities, secure borders, sensible spending. Tell me where I'm going for right here. You know, we wanna, have the right to self protection. We we should respect the constitution and not try to break the constitution. It's there for a reason. And, you know, we we should stop law fair. I I kinda listed these out. These are all listed on the America PAC website. People can go look at the America PAC website, to the americapac.org, and see if there's anything they disagree with, or where perhaps we should modify these goals. But I think these are good goals to have. They, they're certainly part of the oh, and right to free speech, you know, first amendment. If we don't have free speech, we don't have democracy because people cannot make an informed vote. So those are my controversial views. And, you know, and and look, I I I don't think either party I don't think the Republicans are perfect. I don't think obviously, right now, I more Republican than Democrat, but it's not like I think the Republican Party is perfect or or is is without issues. But we've got a choice between 2 candidates. And I think on balance, it's a no brainer, to vote for Trump. And if we don't vote for Trump, I think we're at serious risk of losing our democracy and becoming a one party state where, there isn't an election anymore. There's only a democratic primary like there Speaker 0: is in California. Elon Musk, thank you. Speaker 1: You're welcome.
Saved - October 20, 2024 at 6:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's recent endorsement of "DARK MAGA" has raised eyebrows, suggesting a connection to occult practices. The term "MAGA" is linked to sorcery, implying Musk identifies as a Dark Magician. His biographer, Walter Isaacson, observed Musk's erratic behavior, hinting at deeper psychological issues, including possible multiple personalities. Musk's obsession with AI and transhumanism aligns with his family's technocratic background, raising concerns about his role in a potential surveillance state. Despite his claims of supporting free speech, he appears to be part of the elite agenda.

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon Musk & the Church of Satan 🧵 Elon Musk made headlines for his recent support of The Don claiming he is "DARK MAGA". That one statement is extremely revealing. Elon is blatantly saying he is a Dark Magician (Occultist). Why would he do this? It's all part of the Spellcraft. https://t.co/F3sAnIDeE9

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Many call it "Revelation of the Method". MAGA is the fifth and highest degree in the Church of Satan. In Latin, Maga is the Feminine Form of Magus, which means "Sorcerer" or "Magician". In Italian and Spanish, MAGA means a Female Wizard or Sorcerer. https://t.co/bpoqswQRbt

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In Slavic and other languages, same thing MAGA is associated with MAGIC, the SUPERNATURAL, MAGICIAN, SORCERER or WITCH. DARK MAGA = Dark MAGICIAN Musk is a Dark Occultist, a Wolf in Sheep Clothing. It's not ONE piece of "EVIDENCE" but the long and continous pattern. https://t.co/tkDFaii1NX

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon comes from a long line of TECHNOCRATS. HE is a EUGENISTS, a TRANSHUMANIST and one of the "Chosen Magicians" to usher in the New World Order, the Thelemic Aeon of Horus, the Crowned and Conquering Child. https://t.co/eUDUUIAaba

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon Musk allowed Biographer Walter Isaacson "Total Access" to his life for two years. Isaacson noticed quickly thst Musk was far from his ideal or "normal" candidate for a Biography. Musk already sees himself as a Historical Figure, somewhat Timeless, a Living Icon. https://t.co/qNIJXbKE8K

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

But then during Isaacon's stay with Musk, “everything was going so well that [Musk] became uncomfortable”, Isaacson says. “He doesn’t like things when they are going well. He is addicted to drama.” This was around the time Elon planned to buy (hijack) Twitter rebranding it as X. https://t.co/SBOnDnoiaV

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Isaacson says, “I thought it was insane — Musk doesn’t have empathy and so Twitter was not a good fit for him.” Isaacson thought Musk's issues were much deeper, even possibly having Multiple Personalities or, in MK-Ultra terms, Altars. Elon would have "Demonic Fits". https://t.co/5dZ4nf3HsF

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

"In front of me he would go into multiple Elon Musk personalities. There are times he gets really dark and he goes into what Grimes (Elon's Baby Mama & Self-Stylized Witch) calls ‘demon mode’. He will become angry. But then when he snaps out he will hardly remember what he did." https://t.co/MNZHITKcYX

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Demon Mode is the modern day Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. Elon is obbessed with A.I. Elon Musk said in an interview, "With Artificial Intelligence, we are summoning the DEMON." So Musk's Solution is to MERGE MAN with MACHINE. Why? Musk says, "It's Envitable" Is it, though? https://t.co/TAxHl6xGdN

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

He told me he thinks he is bipolar but has never been diagnosed,” Isaacson said, “But I think it is more complicated.” It most definitely is. “He is driven by demons,” Isaacson said. Did Isaacson mean the Christian Meaning of Demon, a Literal DEVIL or the Greek Meaning Daimon? https://t.co/mexJzb7jqO

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In Greek, a Daimon was an ANGEL of Inspiration. Perhaps Isaacson meant both DEMON and DAIMON. Musk surrounds himself with a Harem of Witches. In Grime's song "We Appreciate Power", she "sings", "People like to say that we're insane But AI will reward us when it reigns." https://t.co/WR3QaMTe6I

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

"Pledge allegiance to the world's most powerful computer Simulation: it's the future What will it take to make you capitulate? We appreciate power And if you long to never die Baby, plug in, upload your mind Come on, you're not even alive If you're not backed up on a drive" https://t.co/bojxSHbZN7

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In November 2018, Elon tweeted, "Maybe A.I. will make me follow it, laugh like a demon and say who's the pet now..." Elon's Mother Maye grew up practicing South African Witchcraft, there is even evidence to believe Maye was Jack Parson's "Moon Child". https://t.co/ypLY7KxFpu

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

In 1947, Founder of Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Disciple of Aleister Crowley and Thelemite Jack Parson performed the Babalon Working Ritual. Many believe Maye was the "Moonchild" who was destined to give birth to the Anti-Christ. ELYON. Anti-Christ simply means AGAINST CHRIST. https://t.co/QyU7ipMMua

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Maye's Father AND Elon's Grandfather was named Joshua Handleman, who was the Head of Canada's Technocracy Movement. This should awnser ALL questions in regards to Elon's "Role". Elon is NOT against the Elites, he is ONE of them. The Technocratic Christ. What is a "Technocracy"? https://t.co/Um9X69xQfO

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

It is definied as "the government or control of society or industry by an elite of technical experts." The Technical Expert is A.I. (Applied Demonolgy). Hence, Elon's OBBESSION with Dues Ex Machina, God out of Machine. Elon is following in his grandfather's footsteps. https://t.co/HCYcVHxTpP

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Nueralink is next on the Eugenics Agenda. Every company Musk aquires and move he makes is to further create a MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE. A Eugenicist is responsible for the culling and controlling of the population. Vax Em and Chip Em. This is NOT a secret. https://t.co/iCKvQj5hBi

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Elon us Pro-Jab and Vax Pro-Carbon Tax. Pro-Universal Basic Income Pro-Climate Hoax Pro-Social Credit System Pro-Transhumanism Pro-CHIPPING OUR BRAINS Pro- Israel (Musk said, “I don’t know if I am genetically Jewish but I am aspirationally Jewish”) https://t.co/OYHaO06Z3c

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Therefore, ELON is ANTI-HUMANITY. Elon's Jacket at the Met Gala literally read NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM or "New World Order". Elon thinks he is one of the NEW "gods". https://t.co/rVeS1QYdrR

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

BUT.. he's a Pro-Free Speech! No, he is NOT, brain rot. Elon is not a RENEGADE "Tony Stark" CHARACTER, he is ONE of the BIGGEST Contractors of the United State's Department of Defense. He is AGAINST "Them", HE is THEM. https://t.co/7C7DfGFRnW

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Do I even need to mention Nazi Scientist and Future NASA Founder Wernher Van Braun's 1952 book called the "Mars Project" which imagined a person named ELON leading a Human Colony on MARS. MARS is an ANAGRAM for RAMS. Mars is, also, the Roman God of WAR. WAR on the 99 PERCENT. https://t.co/IndGEkLWn5

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

SpaceX furthers NASA'S Mass Programming in the "Church of SCIENCE", imdoctrinating those into the SOUL-LURE System. NASA is simply a Clandestine Masonic Order. NASA is thr Right Pillar, SpaceX (or GHEYSEX) is the Left Pillar in this LAND of MAKE beLIEve. https://t.co/c2AacPLWM3

@AmurakaHidden - Hiddeπ Amur∆Ka: Thr𓂀ce (G)REatEST ॐ

Thanks to @TPallets, I may have "borrowed" his Title but I thought it was too good not to run with it. He has an excellent video on YT on Elon and some other great content, as well. I've been on Elon's neck for a minute now and I won't let up on it, either. 🧵🔚 https://t.co/Za1oVwj1Fa

Saved - December 19, 2024 at 10:30 PM

@_NicoleNonya - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Why was Elon Musk forced to reveal who really owns X? 🧐 https://t.co/azy4L5lgTj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk was ordered by a judge to disclose the identities of individuals who purchased X, revealing that Larry Ellison, creator of Oracle, was among them. Notably, Oracle's data collection software originated from a secret CIA project before Ellison's involvement, maintaining its original name, Project Oracle, and securing significant contracts with the CIA. Musk presents X as a platform for free speech, but it functions similarly to other social media, focusing on data collection and having connections to the CIA. Additionally, Sean Combs Capital appeared on the list, indicating Diddy's investments in spy software.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Elon Musk was just forced by a judge to release the names of the people who bought x with them. One of the names was the creator of Oracle Larry Ellison via the Lawrence j Ellison revocable trust. Funny thing about the Oracle data collection software is that it started as a secret CIA project 3 years before Larry created it. I mean, he didn't even change the name of it, see, project Oracle, And his biggest contracts were always with the CIA. Elon Musk uses the illusion of freedom of speech as a smokescreen, so we forget that X is like every other social media platform, data collection software with ties to the CIA. Another weird name on the list was Sean Combs Capital, adding spy software to the list of other Diddy Investments.
Saved - December 30, 2024 at 12:16 AM

@gregreese - Greg Reese

Elon Musk has always been a fraud. And has all the appearances of an MK Ultra puppet. https://t.co/r6CewzIEtm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk, often portrayed as a self-made genius, has a complex background. Born in South Africa, he claims poverty despite his family's ownership of an emerald mine. He attended the University of Pennsylvania on a full scholarship and dropped out of Stanford after two days. Musk co-founded Zip 2 with his brother, which was sold for $307 million, but he faced challenges with coding and management. He later merged his online bank, x.com, with Confinity, which became PayPal, but was ousted as CEO. Musk falsely claims to have founded Tesla, which was established by Marc Tarpenning and Martin Eberhard. He maneuvered to become chairman and later CEO, rewriting the company's history. Musk's personal life includes a troubled relationship with his father, who has faced serious accusations. Overall, his narrative is filled with controversy and claims of deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some sort of eccentric heavyweight genius with humble beginnings, but this is demonstrably Elon Musk was born in South Africa where he claims he grew up extremely poor, but his family owned an emerald mine. As a teenager, Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New York City, and his father bragged how they had so much money we couldn't even close our safe. Musk claims to have had about a $100,000 of student loan debt, but he received a full scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania where he bought a 10 bedroom frat house with his friend Adeo Ressi and ran an illegal nightclub. The pop culture claim is that Elon has an IQ of a 155, but this has never been tested. And after being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he dropped out after 2 days. After dropping out, Elon began his first business venture with his brother Kimbal, Zip 2, which was essentially a digital version of the yellow pages. The brothers received tens of 1,000 of dollars from their parents, and yet Elon denies this. An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got involved to bring in investors. But Elon's code was no good, so they had to hire on professional coders to rewrite everything. Zip 2 was then sold for $307,000,000 to Compaq who later shut it down without ever earning a profit. Elon made $22,000,000, bought a $1,000,000 McLaren f 1 supercar, which made mainstream news before he totaled the uninsured vehicle. Musk then went on to create an online bank, x.com. He partnered with banking expert, Harris Fricker, Edward Ho, and Christopher Paine. All 3 ended up leaving the company after accusing Elon of lying to the media about the quality of their product. Elon claims he founded PayPal. Before the company was named PayPal, it was known as Confinity. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. After losing 1,000,000 of dollars, Elon's x.com was bought by Confinity in a merger in 2,000. All Musk contributed at Confinity was his own power struggle. He made himself CEO and pushed to change the name to x.com. The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk while he was away on vacation. Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated that all references to founders of the company will be removed from their website, allowing Elon to claim credit, which so far is all he has ever achieved. Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as PayPal, went public, and sold to eBay for $1,500,000,000 Elon made 180,000,000 from the deal, which he then invested into Tesla, SpaceX, and failed company SolarCity. Elon falsely claims to be the founder of Tesla. Tesla was founded in 2003 by Marc Tarpenning and Martin Eberhard, who developed the Tesla Roadster. When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital, they approached Elon Musk, who had the fake credibility as PayPal's cofounder. Musk joined with the condition that he be named chairman of the board. In emails, Musk was upset that the media was not giving him credit for Tesla Motors and went after Martin Eberhard, replacing him as CEO. He then forced Eberhard out of the company and rewrote the company's history to have himself listed as an original cofounder. Martin to have himself listed as an original cofounder. Martin Eberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster, was promised the first Roadster off the assembly line, but Musk screwed him over on that as well and sent that car into space. Speaker 1: You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. Speaker 0: So who is Elon Musk? Elon describes his father as being an evil, abusive man. His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of being a pedophile and fathered a child with his stepdaughter who is 42 years younger than him. This spoiled, narcissistic failure, son of accused pedophile, wants to put computer chips in everyone's brain so that we can merge with artificial intelligence. His girlfriend is now bragging how this could all lead to a communist utopia. And strangely enough, former Nazi and head of NASA, Wernher von Braun, predicted a man named Elon would conquer Mars in a 1952 novel that he wrote, which is odd because NASA has partnered with Elon SpaceX to work towards colonizing Mars. Elon Musk, like everything else in today's modern society, is a fraud, a fake genius, just like fake philanthropist Bill Gates and his fake vaccines, brought to you by the fake news. Here's a pro tip for dealing with the stream media and all of pop culture. Assume it's a lie and research everything. Speaker 1: You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly.
Saved - December 31, 2024 at 3:04 PM

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Elon Musk changes his name to Kekius Maximus and his his profile picture to Pepe Drop a 🐸 if you know… https://t.co/xhK1uA0g4q

Saved - January 2, 2025 at 3:27 PM

@Ashleyhays2089 - Ashley Hays

So Elon changed his name to Kekius, which is a demonic god of darkness. He’s also wearing Roman garb because he’s anticipating the revived Roman Empire- aka beast system. If you have eyes to see…. https://t.co/ztRmoFDxqN

Saved - January 4, 2025 at 11:48 PM

@MAVERIC68078049 - MAVERICK X

Elon Musk is not who you think he is https://t.co/cHHldQh7vy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Us is not who you think he is. You were attempting a mission to extract data. How do you embrace and teach a culture that accepts this approach, especially when you're not intentionally trying to?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Us is not who you think he is. Out of the thing. Yeah. You were trying to like do a mission. You're just trying to get data out of the thing. Yeah. So and why do you embrace it? Or how do you how do you teach that culture even that it's okay when you're not even trying to, like, you know, s a a.
Saved - January 6, 2025 at 10:18 PM

@mitsufoppie - mitsu 𓃦

>gets caught liking porn >makes likes private >his ex-wife blocks him >changes the way blocking works >notices everyone on his posts' comments in shitting on him >announces he will penalize any tweet deemed as negative masterful gambit sir

@Dexerto - Dexerto

Elon Musk says the new Twitter/X algorithm will penalize “negativity” https://t.co/QefwWw5yHr

Saved - January 28, 2025 at 9:19 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

BREAKING ‼️ Elon Musk has just said it’s a “Good idea” for him to launch a lawsuit against CNN for Defamation CNN continues to push the white supremacy and Nazi hand signal propaganda. Saying that Nazis have embraced Elon Musk. “Nazis think he’s a Nazi” https://t.co/uqoZBjacVI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk has made controversial statements linking Jews to the demographic changes in the U.S. and suggesting they promote hatred against white people. While some defend him, citing his support for Jewish communities, others argue that his remarks align with extremist views. The discussion highlights a divide over how to interpret Musk's actions, with some claiming he deserves scrutiny for his comments, while others believe he is being unfairly targeted. The conversation also touches on the lack of attention given to rising anti-Semitism on college campuses compared to the focus on Musk. The debate continues over the implications of his statements and the broader context of anti-Semitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, the the first time that Elon Musk decides to declare that globalist Jews are responsible for the great replacement of brown people into the United States, maybe it was a misunderstanding. You know? The second time he said that Jews are pushing hatred against white people, that's a quote. You know, that was a little iffy. By the second Sieg Heil, I think he kind of loses the benefit of the doubt to to be not accused of playing FTSE with these Nazis. I'm not saying he's a Nazi, I'm saying the Nazis think he's a Nazi, which they very clearly did at this event. And this was not, these words were not said in a vacuum. As you pointed out, the leaders of AFD have, embraced, in many cases, the Nazi heritage. They have wanted to take down the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, saying it is inappropriate to to recognize this horrific chapter in German history. And I I just think it's it's horrific. I I don't understand why this guy keeps getting the benefit of the doubt, whether or not he believes this stuff personally. Speaker 1: Mentioned the Nazi jokes he was making on Twitter that actually got Speaker 0: He's been given so many chances. About Speaker 1: it. Yeah. I I was hearing a lot of signs, Scott. What's the Yeah. Speaker 2: I mean, we we've moved on from Trump Derangement Syndrome to Elon Derangement Syndrome. Derangement Syndrome. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Do you wanna defend anything? Speaker 2: There's ample Speaker 0: The Germans get to this let him finish, Catherine. Speaker 2: I love I love this game we play where you talk for 2 minutes, I talk for 3 seconds, and you freak out. So so he has a long record of supporting the Jewish people, number 1. Number 2, anybody who is asserting this, thing he did on the stage the other day was a sig heil, which I just heard you say. You know, lawyer up maybe because absolute ridiculous thing to say under no circumstances. Speaker 0: In Germany thought it was a sig heil. Under no sir The Nazis in Germany Speaker 2: thought it was a sig heil. Was he doing anything other than expressing enthusiastically Why Speaker 1: did she do it on TV right now? Speaker 2: Is appreciating that. Speaker 0: Why don't Speaker 1: she do it on Speaker 0: TV right now? Do you think it's so Speaker 2: Number 3. So Speaker 0: you know, that number that is canal. Speaker 2: Number 3. I think it is fully You know? Number 3. I think it is fully appropriate, and I, of course, have been the strongest supporter of the Jewish people on this network for over a year since October 7th. Is that true? To remember to remember the Holocaust and to remember the atrocities committed against the Jewish people. And I also think it's appropriate to remember the atrocities committed against them right now. Speaker 1: And it seems to me let Speaker 2: me just finish my point. Speaker 1: It seems to me I won't let you change the subject. It seems to me. Address what Speaker 2: we're talking about. Speaker 0: As the Jew at this table Speaker 1: I'm trying I'm trying Speaker 0: to finish my point. Point. Speaker 2: The people who are most concerned about and the most all over Elon Musk today have had nary a word for the Nazis on college campuses who've gone crazy for the last year and a half. Speaker 0: That is full. Speaker 2: That is full. Nothing. Speaker 0: I am a Jew.
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 2:47 PM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Learn How Elon Musk Is Successfully Commanding A Global Takedown Of the New World Order System Watch Alex Jones Break Down The Latest Developments Of Trump and Musk’s Total Offensive For Latest Reports Watch On X Live: https://t.co/deeXoYp8ZK https://t.co/UyULO1TmnQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a deliberate global sabotage aimed at collapsing civilization. To counter this, we must choose a side against the globalist depopulation agenda. Elon Musk is now a key independent voice, actively coordinating efforts to dismantle the new world order and challenging various globalist operations. His actions, alongside Trump's, are crucial in this battle. Recent developments include efforts to remove climate change propaganda from government sites and restrict certain narratives. The situation is dire, but with leaders like Musk and Trump, there’s hope for a counteroffensive against these forces. We must remain vigilant and critical, recognizing the existential threat we face while supporting those fighting against it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the top, this is a deliberate global sabotage of civilization for a post industrial human collapse. And if you wanna stop that as I do and must does and Trump does and you do, then you've gotta choose a side. And before, no one was explaining that the globalist depopulationists were the only team in control and the only ideology. And I'm like, hey. We gotta impose the globalist depopulation death cult and point out they're cutting off the resources to collapse society, consolidate power. This is really bad. This is siege. This is feudalism two point o. And then Elon Musk I mean, he was already saying that a decade ago. He was already he already got that. But then as he learned more and and and and and looked into things, he is now not just the biggest independent voice of truth. He is integrating all of their different systems and then how to integratedly attack them. He is just attacking not just the big globalist operations, but even their little central spin off motherships like the globalist in Austin and other key areas, and he's battling globalist different countries. I mean, he's just got a full offense. So dizzying, I can barely even keep track of it, much less imagine him commanding the attacks. And and and people don't know, Elon Musk is commanding a global coordinated takedown of the new world order. If they just stole that election or killed Trump, I'd be already indicted or in prison right now. So you better bet your ass. I don't bite the hand that feeds me, but that's not the hand feeding me. That's the hand fighting, the fist fighting right next to me. So I don't bite or kick or stab the people right beside me, blowing the living shit out of our enemies. DC US Attorney fires Jan. 6. Launches new probe. Trump reportedly tells USDA to remove all climate change propaganda from their websites by end of day to day. Obama judge blocks Trump's federal spending freeze for 22 states, which was just on grant money going to private groups. DOD kicks MSM players from Pentagon press corps. Beautiful. Yeah. All the real media has not been there, but, really, they're gonna rotate through and say, oh, sorry. Every you have to get in the hopper. We're just gonna randomly choose who gets to be here. You know, other people get to be here that have much bigger audiences than you, by the way. USDA told to remove climate change. Already mentioned that. Federal employees told to remove pronouns from email signatures by end of day. Exclusive. Musk aids lock government workers out of computer systems at US agency. Yep. Stop the hacking and leaking. CDC scrubs research database referencing sexual orientations or gender identity. See, the leftist didn't they were so arrogant last time. Trump didn't know how to take control. Now he's been studying and does. Well, you gotta lock them out of people that are suspect out of their computers while you review them so that they can't delete the information. And most of them are so stupid. You you can't just wipe a hard drive. You have to wipe it, and then you have to write over it and wipe it at least again. And I'm doing that as a layperson, but the the different systems. But people that think you just erase a hard drive. No. You gotta override it, dumbass. Or ask Hillary. Gotta use hammers. CDC scrubs research database referencing sexual orientation, gender identity. They're just getting rid of the whole database. Clinton appointed judge blocks transgender inmate being moved to men's prison defying Trump's second order. Look. They can run. Look at this pervert. But they can't hide that that'll get overturned. Yeah. The raping women in prison by men's ending. Fact check. Yes. Obama and Biden had FAA hire people with intellectual, psychiatric, and severe physical disabilities. And it has been causing major problems, and that's why we've got record crashes and issues. Trump was right again. FAA enrolled in lawsuit alleging it turned away 1000 applicants because they were white. Alright. Absolutely incredible. Do we have the economist on the line, guys? Alright. I have one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve thirteen other stacks I'm sorry. 14 stacks of do you think this was key? Everything is old. Nothing is, is is more important than the other. It all intersects. It all interconnects. But the most important thing to know is at the top, the plan that he stabilize and consolidate power is deliberate. And thank God, Trump is starting to say this is deliberate. Elon Musk is starting to say it's deliberate, and I know they know it's deliberate. And that's a hard thing to tell the public. But when it's the truth, it's the truth. And then people I respect people. I believe they can handle the truth and say, well, we've gotta get hardcore. And and now it's happened. But if you just say it's incompetence, folks yeah. It's incompetence by the idiots they put at the bottom, so they're the bag men and get left, you know, get they're the fall guys. But, no, at the top, this is a deliberate global sabotage of civilization for a post industrial human collapse. And if you wanna stop that as I do and must does and Trump does and you do, then you gotta choose a side. And before, no one was explaining that the globalist depopulationists were the only team in control and the only ideology. And I'm like, hey. We gotta impose the globalist depopulation death cult and point out they're cutting off the resources to collapse society, consolidate power. This is really bad. This is siege. This is just feudalism two point o. And then Elon Musk I mean, he was already saying that a decade ago. He was already he already got that. But then as he learned more and and and and and looked into things, he is now not just the biggest independent voice of truth. He is integrating all of their different systems and then how to integratedly attack them. He is just attacking not just the big globalist operations, but even their little central spin off motherships like the globalist in Austin and other key areas, and he's battling globalist different countries. I mean, he's just got a full offense. So dizzying, I can barely even keep track of it. Much less, imagine him commanding the attacks. And and and people don't know, Elon Musk is commanding a global coordinated takedown of the new world order. And then now that was before Trump got back in. He was helping get Trump in already quarterbacking attacks worldwide. And then as soon as Trump got in, he had more I think he had that job done. He could put more resources to tripling his attack on the globalist worldwide, corporate, governmental, institutional, cultural, and the woke mind virus. And then now Trump even more supercharged with the control of the federal government rolled in to to control the globalist empire because The US built it to now dismantle it and then put it back into real infrastructure and independent decentralized systems. It's just fabulous. I mean, Trump getting reelected? Fabulous. What Musk is doing? Beautiful. I mean and people are like, goddamn. You looked around those. Let me tell you something. We're getting our asses handed to us before from a damn death cult. So you better believe I'm thankful. I say prayers every night thanking god for all of you supporting the broadcast, for my family going through all this, for this crew, for all our guests, and I say specific prayers for Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Because let me tell you something. If they just stole that election or killed Trump, I'd be already indicted or imprisoned right now. So you better bet your ass. I don't bite the hand that feeds me, but that's not the hand feeding me. That's the hand fighting, the fist fighting right next to me. So I don't bite or kick or stab the people right beside me blowing the living shit out of our enemies. And for all the people out there that haven't gotten full fully on board, it doesn't mean we don't criticize Trump or Elon in the wrong about something. It doesn't mean we don't. The point is is that we are in an existential battle right now, and the enemy's striking back. And even if they crash the markets and stuff, it's gonna backfire on them and people don't know they did it. That's why I've looked at every, calculation of different crises. They lose either way, but their cowardly way is a new virus, but people expose that, so that's being lost to them. That's not as useful. It's the economic attack. And that Trump's incompetent, and he's gonna cause this with his tariffs. Unless you've been hiding under a rock, you know about the amazing health benefits of high quality CBD. Well, at Jones CBD dot com, you're gonna get the highest quality, highest rated thousand milligram CBD. They've got CBD products with nano CBD that's even stronger, and you're gonna get the lowest prices on quality CBD you're gonna get anywhere because our sponsor from the major manufacturer is able to private label CBD sold under other names for up to three times the cost being offered here. Not all CBD is created equal. Check out their amazing products, but the one you really wanna look at is Dreamwave that is so good for deep, incredible sleep. But a very special form of concentrated blue chamomile extract, it's incredible. Go now to jonescbd.com and experience this product and others for yourself, and I know you're gonna like it. I want you to come back again and again. Just try it, and it keeps the broadcast on the air.
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 1:37 AM

@TuckerCarlsonPp - Tucker Carlson Page

Elon changed his profile name …. 😂 https://t.co/jdQmoD448Z

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 7:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe Elon Musk and the DOGE team got CNN to keep saying "balls." Now, Dana Bash calls him "Harry Balls," and Erin Burnett and Katie Drummond even explored "Big Balls." Kara Swisher joked that Musk hired him for that very reason!

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

Elon Musk and the DOGE team have successfully gotten the CNN crew to continuously say "balls" on their networks. CNN's Dana Bash is now referring to Elon Musk as "Harry Balls." CNN's Erin Burnett and Katie Drummond recently did a deep dive into "Big Balls," leading Kara Swisher to suggest that his name is why he was hired by Musk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk, using the social media handle "Harry Balls," tweeted that America's democracy is being destroyed by a judicial coup. A 19-year-old, nicknamed "Big Balls" online, now works for Musk at Doge. This individual, who founded multiple companies including Tesla dot sexy LLC at age 16, controls dozens of web domains. This raises concerns about the vetting process for young employees handling sensitive data on potentially hundreds of millions of Americans. Many of these employees are in their early twenties. The lack of vetting might be considered a "feature, not a bug" in the tech world. We are unsure how well Musk knows these individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the disruptor in chief, Elon Musk, who apparently has adopted the alias, at least he changed his social media handle to Harry balls, tweeted this morning, democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup. Judicial coup. So this is a 19 year old high school graduate, who has used, the unfortunate nickname, Big Balls online. So that would be one way that we could refer to him. He is now working at Musk's behest, inside Doge, and we looked into his background. And so we found, you know, several notable things, Aaron. One of which, is that this individual has founded multiple companies, including one, with another unfortunate name, Tesla dot sexy LLC, which he established in 2021. He would have been around 16 years old. Now this LLC controls dozens of web domains. Speaker 1: So, Kara, you know, you hear this and you have known Elon Musk for years. So now you look at these young men who are now in data and in the private information about maybe hundreds of millions of American citizens as young as 19, the the big balls here, that Katie's talking about. Most of them are in their early twenties. There's an exception I'm gonna get to in a minute. I'm curious though, Cara. How well does even Musk know these young men, do you think? Speaker 2: I have no idea. I think there's no vetting whatsoever. As you can see, that's taken place, it took Katie and the really great team. Wired has done an astonishing job here. You know, I could make a joke that's probably why he was hired for all this ridiculous nonsense and and other nefarious things. But, you know, there's an expressions in in technology that's not a it's it's a feature, not a bug.
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 1:43 AM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

CNN's Dana Bash refers to Elon Musk as "Harry Balls” on live television after he changed his name on X 🤣 https://t.co/XIHPeeEHR7

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've noticed some concerning activity from Elon Musk. He's now claiming that democracy in America is being destroyed by a judicial coup. Further, he's hired a 19-year-old, who goes by Big Balls online, to work inside Doge. My team and I investigated this individual's background and found he founded multiple companies, including Tesla dot sexy LLC when he was around 16. These young men, some as young as 19, now have access to private information about potentially hundreds of millions of Americans. I seriously doubt that Musk has properly vetted any of these individuals, especially given some of the names of these companies. This seems to be a feature and not a bug.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the disruptor in chief, Elon Musk, who apparently has adopted the alias, at least he changed his social media handle to Harry balls, tweeted this morning, democracy in America is being destroyed by judicial coup. Judicial coup. So this is a 19 year old high school graduate, who has used, the unfortunate nickname, Big Balls online. So that would be one way that we could refer to him. He is now working at Musk's behest, inside Doge, and we looked into his background. And so we found, you know, several notable things, Aaron. One of which, is that this individual has founded multiple companies, including one, with another unfortunate name, Tesla dot sexy LLC, which he established in 2021. He would have been around 16 years old. Now this LLC controls dozens of web domains. Speaker 1: So, Kara, you know, you hear this and you have known Elon Musk for years. So now you look at these young men who are now in data and in the private information about maybe hundreds of millions of American citizens as young as 19, the the big balls here, that Katie's talking about. Most of them are in their early twenties. There's an exception I'm gonna get to in a minute. I'm curious though, Cara. How well does even Musk know these young men, do you think? Speaker 2: I have no idea. I think there's no vetting whatsoever. As you can see, that's taken place, it took Katie and the really great team. Wired has done an astonishing job here. You know, I could make a joke that's probably why he was hired for all this ridiculous nonsense and and other nefarious things. But, you know, there's an expressions in in technology that's not a it's it's a feature, not a bug.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 11:13 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Check out my bio https://t.co/vAUdrHVDW5

Saved - March 12, 2025 at 7:35 AM

@hdwmovies - Harry

How Grok is moving right now https://t.co/0qi0oeyH2q

@grok - Grok

@f30james @NebsGoodTakes Yes, it's real. Elon Musk admitted in a 2024 deposition to using the @ermnmusk account to roleplay as his toddler son, X AE A-XII. The account posted odd stuff like wishing to go to nightclubs and celebrating "turning 3" on the kid's birthday. Weird, but confirmed.

Saved - March 30, 2025 at 2:49 AM

@Ikennect - I am Ken

Fact- @elonmusk = Not a chill normal dude😂 What did you expect? https://t.co/P2M81kHoRY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker acknowledges saying or posting strange things, attributing it to their unique way of thinking. They apologize to anyone they may have offended. The speaker then states they reinvented electric cars and are sending people to Mars in a rocket ship. They imply that these accomplishments preclude them from being a "chill, normal dude."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, I know I sometimes say or post strange things, but that's just how my brain works. To anyone I've offended, I just wanna say, I reinvented electric cars, and I'm sending people to Mars in a rocket ship. Did you think I was also gonna be a chill, normal dude?
Saved - June 14, 2025 at 2:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the disturbing realities of X, formerly Twitter, where censorship and manipulation run rampant. I've uncovered horrific content hidden in hashtags, with the platform seemingly complicit in allowing predators to thrive. Despite having the technology to address these issues, X appears to prioritize profits over safety, creating a toxic environment. I can no longer support a platform that harbors such darkness, and I’m choosing to leave for Truth Social, where I believe these problems do not exist.

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

🧵 X The Digital Devil's Den 🧵 The place we call X, formally Twitter the Social Media Platform, is anything but that. What lies on the surface is the censorship, propaganda, grifts, scams, and lies, imposing psychological manipulation of the public. What's below is far worse! https://t.co/eaY4nlFiU5

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

As most probably already know, I shed light on some incredibly uncomfortable horrors that exist on X hidden casually in hashtags. These hashtags allowed predators to communicate and mass distribute amongest each other. To make matters worse X is completely aware and complict. https://t.co/v17bN7w0Jt

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

This disturbing material is not there by accident. It had ZERO Guardrails unlike what you see on the surface level of X's Moderation. Many posts are labeled by different categories and some are even given the sensitive content warning, however none of it was implemented here. https://t.co/0MX9CTkIUX

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

The lack of Guardrails in place and the fact it was so easily roaming free looks intentional rather than neglectful. They have the technology to remove all of this right now, but they do not, even when they know it exists. If that doesn't have you saying WTF, brace yourself. https://t.co/noUD4f42tp

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Many kept wondering why the algorithm was never changing regarding censorship. It's because this algorithm is not only used to just control narratives, but also to hide what's below. It's all part of the same system created by Twitter that's now doing the exact same thing. https://t.co/3wM7NX2xvy

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

It's safe to assume that this stuff has been going on for a very long time. This isn't some nightmare shadow part of internet that they tell people about. It is downloadable right from the app store, disguised as social media, and hidden right under your noses using hashtags. https://t.co/8FDMYE9Qtc

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If your not completely disgusted yet, well it gets worse. Notice how all your "Save the Children" Grifters have been silent. This is because X is their Gravy Train and they don't want to disrupt that. For them the money and the clout are more important, some even defending X. https://t.co/HcW1uaitHO

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

While you are reading this and others scroll their timeline oblivious to what is sitting right below the surface, these illegal activities continue. If anyone says these things cannot be combated they are completely ignorant. Truth Social has none of this grotesque content. https://t.co/SfIcgb3VOH

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Other social media platforms, not just X, have the capabilities to remove all of it too. This problem is likely much greater on larger platforms like Facebook who have also been scrutinized for similar reasons. They all seem to share the same business model, profits over kids. https://t.co/AicommM9k9

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Here's the thing though, it's not just about the profits, there has to be a more important reason not to remove it. I greatly suspect there are some high levels of blackmail going on which allow this to continue so blatantly. All of this can't possibly be true though, right? https://t.co/5SXNQq1tv1

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Let me remind of all the corrupt things they used social media for in the past like swaying elections, suspending a sitting President, censorship of information, psychological manipulation of the public, and getting rich doing all of that. They are very capable of all of this! https://t.co/f0J75j17g3

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

Now X has swiftly implemented Xchat, not as a tool for your security, but as a tool of obscurity for these continued nefarious activities. Once they have their Xmoney implemented then then this place becomes a 1 stop shop for all types of criminal activity. A Virtual Cesspool! https://t.co/uK69ESg73b

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

X has quite literally become the Mark of the Beast not just by name, but by how it operates. You need to pay into the system through the Blue Check in order to make money in the System. You must then have certain numbers to show your commitment to being part of the System. https://t.co/Uvlp2pEsii

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If this whole thing isn't screaming out the big picture for you yet, let me make it simple. There exists a Digital Epstein Island below the surface level world on X and it's being funded by just you being on here. These dark corners must be scrubbed from existence forever. https://t.co/b3WnWkSzLV

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

If social media platforms continue to go unpunished for this illegal activity happening on their platform, then the existence of it will remain for eternity. Are you willing to remain using this platform knowing what you know now? At what point are you willing draw the line?? https://t.co/IEGUb3IjVd

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

MAGA was willing to boycott Budlight because of Dylan Mulvaney, yet they won't boycott X for far worse. For me, I can no longer stay here in good conscience. The profound depths of evil things that exist on this platform is something I want no part of, so I must leave for good. https://t.co/wuM0dHS6oJ

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

I know I have shared a lot of uncomfortable truths with everyone over the last few years. Hopefully it has been enlightening for you. My work here is now done, but if you wish to continue the conversation, please join me on Truth Social where these terrible things do not exist. https://t.co/1qEvdoxycI

Saved - September 14, 2025 at 8:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been discussing the connections between various individuals and organizations surrounding the recent assassination of Charlie Kirk. I highlighted the involvement of figures like Roelof Botha and Shaun Maguire, linking them to past events like 9/11 and current Israeli military ties. I've also pointed out the financial backing from VY Capital and the implications of their relationships with entities tied to intelligence operations. The posts detail threats made against Candace Owens and the broader context of alleged conspiracies, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency.

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION UPDATE* 🚨PRO TIP: You’ll wanna remember my posts about 9/11, the PayPal Mafia, Confinity (Thiel) http://X.com (Musk) and ROELOF BOTHA, PayPal CFO during 9/11, a 9/11 co-conspirator and the CURRENT MANAGING PARTNER of SEQUOIA CAPITAL... …aka, the current BOSS of SHAUN MAGUIRE, a PARTNER at SEQUOIA CAPITAL, who is now DEEPLY in bed with the ISRAELI MILITARY, ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE and the LIKUD PARTY. (Kela Technologies) That’ll lead you HERE, right to the TPUSA ADVISORY BOARD, VY CAPITAL (COVID), SEQUOIA CAPITAL, KELA TECHNOLOGIES, PAYPAL MAFIA (CONFINITY/X.COM, 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATORS), LIKUD, IDF, SHAUN MAGUIRE (SEQUOIA/KELA) and… …ROELOF BOTHA, the MANAGING PARTNER of SEQUOIA CAPITAL, the BOSS of SHAUN MAGUIRE at SEQUOIA CAPITAL, the PAYPAL CFO DURING 9/11, a 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATOR and the GRANDSON of ROELOF BOTHA from NELSON MANDELLA’S SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID REGIME, which HELPED ISRAEL STEAL AMERICAN NUCLEAR SECRETS. And best of all… NOW, @elonmusk and @shaunmmaguire are WORKING TOGETHER to COVER FOR THE PEOPLE WHO MURDERED CHARLIE KIRK and are DESPERATELY WORKING TO MAKE TYLER ROBINSON THEIR PATSY!🤬 (You’re welcome, America. Again.🙏🏼🇺🇸🫡)

Twitter. It’s what’s happening From breaking news and entertainment to sports and politics, get the full story with all the live commentary. twitter.com

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*VY CAPITAL* Yo, @elonmusk! In light of the recent tragedy and the EXTREME escalations against WHITE AMERICAN CITIZENS by JEWS, I guess now’s a GREAT FUCKING TIME to ask you a couple of questions: *Why the FUCK are you in bed with the COVID MOSSAD/CCP/ROTHSCHILD TERRORISTS at DUKE KUNSHAN UNIVERSITY in WUHAN, CHINA? Follow-up: *Do you expect to cooperate with the FEDERAL MURDER INVESTIGATION or will you RUN INTERFERENCE for the killers who did it… because they’re YOUR LONG-TIME BENEFACTORS? And as we all await your answer with bated breath, we might as well get down to brass fucking tax of exactly what I mean. Let’s discuss VY CAPITAL and your FUTURE OF LIFE INSTITUTE colleague, ALEXANDER TAMAS, shall we? VY CAPITAL has consistently been one of your BIGGEST FINANCIAL BACKERS, no? SPACEX? TESLA? TWITTER/X TAKEOVER? XAI PURCHASE OF X? 🚨In fact, isn’t PABLO MENDOZA, the former MANAGING DIRECTOR of VY CAPITAL now HEAD OF FINANCE at XAI, ever since the XAI PURCHASE OF X? (Before VY Capital, Pablo Mendoza was an IBANKING ASSOCIATE at GOLDMAN SACHS. That’ll be a recurring theme.) *VY CAPITAL TEAM* 👺ALEXANDER TAMAS *VY CAPITAL, Chairman *DIGITAL SKY TECHNOLOGIES (DST), Partner *GOLDMAN SACHS IBANKING (London), Co-Head of Internet & Software Coverage in EMEA 🚨NOTE 1: ALEXANDER TAMAS CO-FOUNDED VY CAPITAL in 2013 with MATEUSZ SZESZKOWSKI, a “former” DIRECTOR at KKR (KRAVIS/PFNYC/BILDERBERG/JEW TERROR) and BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP CONSULTANT (JEW SPY). 🚨NOTE 2: DST was CO-FOUNDED by YURI MILNER and GREGORY FINGER, and is led by a buncha RUSSIAN JEWS behind the $450,000,000 GOLDMAN SACHS INVESTMENT into FACEBOOK way back in 2009 (worth a ~10% interest), and who are closely tied to KREMLIN JEWS like the UZBEK OLIGARCH ALISHER USMANOV… who even spent time in SOVIET PRISON in the 1980s. DST was BANKROLLED with CAPITAL from NASPERS… aka, TENCENT and… …GOLDMAN SACHS. 👺JOHN HERING *VY CAPITAL, CEO & Venture Partner *LOOKOUT, Co-Founder & CEO *COALITION, Co-Founder *U.S. DEPT OF DEFENSE *NEW ZEALAND DEFENSE FORCES *WEF, Technology Pioneer 🚨NOTE 1: HERING CO-FOUNDED COALITION with JOSHUA MOTTA, from the CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA). Huh. Weird. *JOSHUA MOTTA was also CXO & Head of “Special Projects” at CLOUDFLARE, after his roles at GOLDMAN SACHS & MICROSOFT, of course. Small world. 🚨NOTE 2: JOHN HERING CO-FOUNDED COALITION with SIGNIFICANT EARLY ROUND CAPITAL from VY CAPITAL, SAM ALTMAN at Y COMBINATOR, DEEP NISHAR from SOFTBANK VENTURES FUND, beginning in MARCH 2018. *FUN FACT: HILLHOUSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT was also a SIGNIFICANT SERIES B (MAY 2019) and SERIES C (MAY 2020) INVESTOR in COALITION. (Huh. Interesting timing, sports fans.) *HILLHOUSE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT: If you’ll remember, that’s the firm led by ZHANG LEI, who manages the UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTS of STANFORD, HARVARD & YALE, manages the ROTHSCHILDS’ PERSONAL INVESTMENTS and sits on the DUKE KUNSHAN UNIVERSITY ADVISORY BOARD in WUHAN, CHINA... where they helped CREATE, RELEASE & COVERUP COVID and ACTIVELY TRAIN THE CCP MILITARY. 🚨CLIFFS: One of @elonmusk’s MOST CONSISTENT FINANCIAL BACKERS of his COMPANIES are quite literally the SOVIET/ZIO/BOLSHEVIK COVID/VACCINE/REMDESIVIR BIOTERRORIST JEWS from MOSSAD/CIA/GCHQ & their CCP CO-CONSPIRATORS in CHINA. (Oh, well… I’m sure THAT’S fine too lmao.) *VY CAPITAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS* 👺STEVE HUFFMAN *REDDIT (PayPal/Sept 11), Co-Founder & CEO 👺SUJAY JASWA *DROPBOX (Chabad Network w/PayPal) *NEW ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES (CIA/IQT/COVID/Barris/Brookings/TEMPUS AI) 👺JAVIER OLIVAN *FACEBOOK, VP 👺JULIE HEREDEN *PAGERDUTY (😶) *UBER (basically an IDF/CIA intel front lol) *DROPBOX (Chabad Network w/PayPal)

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*staple* *staple*

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*SHAUN MAGUIRE* Shaun Maguire is a Jewish spy who is now currently RUNNING COVER for the Jewish TERRORISTS HE WORKS FOR, who are also the people who MURDERED CHARLIE KIRK. What do I mean, you ask? Welp. 🚨Shaun Maguire is a PARTNER at SEQUOIA CAPITAL, where he works directly for former PAYPAL CFO and 9/11 CO-CONSPIRATOR ROELOF BOTHA, the MANAGING PARTNER at SEQUOIA CAPITAL. 🚨ROELOF BOTHA is the GRANDSON of ROELOF “PIK” BOTHA, SOUTH AFRICAN FOREIGN MINISTER in NELSON MANDELLA’S SOUTH AFRICAN “APARTHEID REGIME”, who then continued serving MANDELLA’S GOVERNMENT AFTER APARTHEID ENDED. *This same SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID REGIME helped ISRAELI LEKEM (NUCLEAR ENERGY SPIES) STEAL AMERICA’S NUCLEAR SECRETS in the 1960s-1980s. 🚨SEPTEMBER 10, 2001: On the morning of 09/10/2001, ROELOF BOTHA, PAYPAL’S CFO, accompanied PETER THIEL on their trip from SF to NYC to speak with MORGAN STANLEY about potentially becoming the underwriters on PAYPAL’S upcoming IPO. After the meeting with Morgan Stanley was “supposedly” a disaster, BOTHA and THIEL took the LAST UNITED AIRLINES REDEYE FLIGHT from NYC to SF that same night. The VERY NEXT UNITED AIRLINES FLIGHT the following morning, on SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, would be ONE OF FOUR HIJACKED PLANES used in the SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 ATTACKS against the United States. (Israeli Sayeret Matkal, led by Ehud Barak, Benjamin Netanyahu, Daniel Lewin, etc. were the 9/11 HIJACKERS. Lewin, the Co-Founder & CTO of Akamai, shot the pilots with a gun he’d snuck onboard somehow.) 🚨SEPTEMBER 29, 2001: PAYPAL files its S1 REGISTRATION STATEMENT (IPO), and lists SALOMON SMITH BARNEY as the LEAD UNDERWRITER for its IPO. SSB was the LARGEST TENANT in WTC7, which is the tower that collapsed without having been struck by an airplane, just after former UJA (MOSSAD) CHAIRMAN “LUCKY” LARRY SILVERSTEIN infamously said “PULL IT.” 🚨“AFTER 10/7”, Shaun Maguire jumped into bed with HAMUTAL MERIDOR, the IDF and Unit 8200 as a PARTNER at KELA TECHNOLOGIES. Hamutal Meridor is the former GM of PALANTIR ISRAEL and Unit 8200 officer who was hired by the NSA to put BACKDOORS into many of our most commonly-used smart-device apps. She is also the DAUGHTER of DAN MERIDOR, who was MINISTER of ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE AND ATOMIC ENERGY and a long-time LEADER of the ISRAELI LIKUD PARTY. NOTE: KELA expects to “strongly compete” for AMERICAN GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS going forward. And by “compete”, I mean “with AMERICAN FUCKING CITIZENS”. And by “strongly compete”, KELA means “KELA WILL WIN THE KEY CONTRACTS by BLATANTLY DISCRIMINATING against [SCREENING OUT] NON-JEW AMERICAN CITIZENS on behalf of GLOBAL JEW SUPREMACY, NEPOTISM and TREASON.” 🚨ALSO AT KELA TECHNOLOGIES🚨 The Deputy Commander of Unit 8200, a TALPIOT PROGRAM GRADUATE, a Director of UNIT 81 (Elite Israeli Tech R&D), JOSH WOLFE from LUX CAPITAL (CIA/Carlyle/Cerberus/Pfizer/Bill Gates/Arena/Kleiner Perkins/Election FRAUD/Mossad) and the and which is FUNDED BY SEQUOIA CAPITAL and… …American TAXPAYERS, via IQT (CIA). (Kela Technologies raised $39,000,000 in its most recent funding round, 2024/2025.) 👺HAMUTAL MERIDOR Palantir Israel, Verint, Unit 8200, Likud 👺OMER BAR-ILAN Israeli “Iron Dome” 👺ALON DROR Talpiot Program, MoD “MAFAT” R&D Directorate 👺JASON MANI Israeli Air Force Intelligence, Unit 81 R&D 👺DEPUTY COMMANDER OF UNIT 8200 Advisor to Kela Technologies 👺IN-Q-TEL (CIA) Investor in Kela Technologies 👺JOSH WOLFE (LUX CAPITAL/CIA) Investor in Kela Technologies, Santa Fe Institute And last but certainly not least… 👺SHAUN MAGUIRE (SEQUOIA CAPITAL) Partner & Investor in Kela Technologies Again, Shaun is running interference for Charlie Kirk’s killers and must be tracked down. Hell, I won’t be surprised if Shaun even tries to use Kirk’s murder as pretext to “start a bold new ‘ISRAELI TECH’ firm with the FOREIGN JEW MILITARY AND INTEL PERSONNEL he ACTUALLY works for,” and begins seeking new JEWRY startup capital. (Get fucked, Shaun. You piece of shit.🖕🇺🇸🫡)

@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire

I am in touch with Law Enforcement I am confident that Tyler Robinson was a left wing extremist It’s infuriating to see people try to spin this as if he was on the right because of his family The man murdered Charlie Kirk, a hero of the right Use your brain

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*TPUSA Advisory Board* (Direct, vested interests.)

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*TPUSA ADVISORY COUNCIL* (In a word, yikes.) NOTEWORTHY MEMBERS: ✅MIKE LEVEN *JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS (Mossad), Director *BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION, Director *IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN VETERANS OF AMERICA, Director ✅BARRY RUSSELL *INT’L PETROLEUM ASSOC OF AMERICA (IPAA), President & CEO *BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, M&A and CEO for Corporate Turnarounds NOTE: Did SOMEBODY say BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON again? Somebody? ANYBODY?!😒🤬 ✅DAVID BLUMBERG *BLUMBERG CAPITAL, Founder *BRONFMAN FAMILY OFFICE (😟), Manager of International Investments *APAX PARTNERS (😟), International Investment Manager *CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (Unit 8200/AU10TIX), Launched Business Development as a Top 4 Executive NOTE: Check Point Software Technologies is literally led by Unit 8200 Commander Nadav Zafrir as its brand new CEO.🤦🏻‍♂️ *Prior to Zafrir becoming CEO, CPST was led by Dan Yerushalmi, the CEO of AU10TIX.🤦🏻‍♂️🤬 (We’ll just skip over Charles Bronfman being one of the biggest Mossad assets of all time, and his niece being CONVICTED for her involvement in the NXIVM SEX CULT.🤦🏻‍♂️) ✅FRANK TSAMOUTALES *NATIONAL FINANCE COMMITTEE, Co-Chairman for the POTUS Campaigns of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush & Governor Mike Huckabee *TSAMOUTALES STRATEGIES, Consultant for HONEYWELL, BLACK & VEATCH (GCHQ), WAL-MART and CAESAR’S ENTERTAINMENT (Athora/Apollo/UJA/Icahn/Krongard/Mossad) NOTE: Governor Mike Huckabee is now U.S. Ambassador to ISRAEL for the DJT2 admin. ✅CAMERON POWELL *AIRSTRIP, Co-Founder NOTE: Airstrip founded w/VC money from our friends at SEQUOIA CAPITAL.🤦🏻‍♂️ ✅DARREN BLANTON *SMU COX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS VENTURE FUND (CIA/John Phelan/Third Option Foundation🤬), Director *COLT OIL & GAS, Director https://tpusa.com/team/

Team - TPUSA We play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war tpusa.com

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*DR. SEBASTIAN GORKA* Speaking of TPUSA ADVISORS whose profiles have strangely been scrubbed from the internet, here’s DR. SEBASTIAN GORKA. SEBASTIAN GORKA has been a long-time TPUSA ADVISOR and is the son of a HUNGARIAN SPY from the VITEZI REND. He seems excited about BEN SHAPIRO stepping up to “pick up Charlie Kirk’s bloody mic” in the wake of Kirk’s killing. Imagine the fuck out of that, sports fans.

@SebGorka - Sebastian Gorka DrG

Bravo to @benshapiro for saying he will “pick up @charliekirk11’s bloody mic” and continue his work across American campuses. Don’t care if it’s impolitic, this Catholic thinks you’re a mensch Ben. #WeAreCharlieKirk

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*OREN BARSKY* Here’s Israeli Military Intelligence and IDF operative, OREN BARSKY, openly making “YOU’RE NEXT” death threats to CHARLIE KIRK’S FRIEND, CANDACE OWENS, RIGHT AFTER ISRAEL KILLED CHARLIE KIRK. FUCK. YOU. @orenbarsky.🖕🤬

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

Funny you mention that, @orenbarsky. Because judging by how you’re addressing @RealCandaceO rn, you seem confused about what fucking time it is in America. It appears you still think it’s “Israeli Jabotinsky terrorists are free to make fucking DEATH THREATS to NON-JEW AMERICAN CITIZENS IN AMERICA” o’clock. But I assure you, it REALLY fucking isn’t. And try as you might to conceal your “SPY ON NON-JEW AMERICANS with ISRAELI MILITARY & ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE” operations behind your http://webstart.co.il domain (which you created in SEPTEMBER 2020), it appears you suck dick at being an Israeli spy and military operative as well. (I’m guessing you suck dick in real life too.) *Here’s a clue, dipshit: Next time, don’t register your fucking domain to GORNI INTERACTIVE LTD and THIS fucking guy. You fucking retard.👇 🚨SHOLOMI AVMAROV🚨 In the off-chance you forgot who SHLOMO AVMAROV is, he’s the… …HEAD of IT, TELECOMS & SYSTEMS for ISRAELI MILITARY INTELLIGENCE and the ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES, @orenbarsky. And I know JEW TERRORISTS like Ze’ev Jabotinsky and Menachem Begin are y’all’s heroes and shit, and that y’all still think it’s 1945 in MANDATORY PALESTINE, but please let me be PERFECTLY fucking clear. You step foot on U.S. soil with this same energy aimed at AMERICAN CITIZENS, we’ll kill you. And they’ll NEVER find your body. Is that clear enough, cunt?

@orenbarsky - Oren Barsky 🎗️

@RealCandaceO Your day will come

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*ZAPRUDER FILM 2025* This SHOCKING video makes it appear that Charlie Kirk is shot by the older man in the greenish/gray shirt, standing just off stage with the gun hidden under his left arm. You see him aim, you see Charlie react to the shooting and then you see him briefly unveil and then quickly conceal the handgun.

@TheRealDeanRyan - Dean Ryan

BREAKING: The Smoking Gun Point Blank Killer For More Visit http://RealDealMedia.TV #Charlie #REALDEALMEDIA

Video Transcript AI Summary
So while the rest of the country is told to beware, be cautious of the Trans Tifas, the radical left, the lone gunman with the impossible rifle, Well, the killer, just as I originally thought, was point blank and amongst us the entire time, but more importantly amongst Charlie Kirk in his inner circle. And that's how the nefarious ways of the Mossad of Israel control the narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So while the rest of the country is told to beware, be cautious of the Trans Tifas, the radical left, the lone gunman with the impossible rifle, Well, the killer, just as I originally thought, was point blank and amongst us the entire time, but more importantly amongst Charlie Kirk in his inner circle. And that's how the nefarious ways of the Mossad of Israel control the narrative.
Real Deal Media Online hub for News | Music | Film LIVE Weeknights 10PM ET - Everywhere - realdealmedia.tv

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky Yep. This is THE SHOOTER who killed Charlie Kirk. Let’s make his punk ass famous. https://t.co/DMeGj10Jxn

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

*NICE FUCKING MURDER WEAPON, FGT* 🚨THIS IS THE DUDE who shot Charlie Kirk.🚨 SLEUTHS, you know what to do. Let’s find his punk ass and make him famous TONIGHT! A MASSIVE SHOUTOUT to @TheRealDeanRyan on this incredible find! Fantastic work, brother!🔥🔥 Please share this far and wide and get JUSTICE! FUCK ALL OF THESE TRAITORS!🇺🇸🫡

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky https://t.co/N7dAJWHG8M

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

Credit to @Smockedindaface.🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/n6f8QiNn2u

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky The South African Sequoia coverup continues. https://t.co/3JmRwf5ZCd

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky *RUBIO, HUCKABEE & NETANYAHU* This is a reeeeeal bad look 5 days out. https://t.co/9Ob2OI935L

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky “Kirk’s Murder Can’t Erase His Antisemitism” What a title. These are definitely the good guys.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Even in death Carlie Kirk can't get away from the allegations of antisemitism. Why? Really think about it. 9/11/25

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky And here’s our boy Gorka. It’s clear who’s who now. These are Israeli spies who must be stopped, peacefully or otherwise. https://t.co/1oO8LA1Ny8

@SebGorka - Sebastian Gorka DrG

Just landed in Israel. Utterly sobering to see the pictures of all the innocent hostages still being held by Hamas for more than 700 days lining the walkway to passport control. Then a friend who’s already here sends me this picture of an IDF soldier in the Old Town. President @realDonaldTrump is the one man who can bring them all home. @WhiteHouse

@holabackup2 - Johnny Lawson

@orenbarsky Keep going, you fucking Jew terrorist. Piss us off. https://t.co/zzwBTBQ4t6

@orenbarsky - Oren Barsky 🎗️

Let me be clear: Candace Owens can keep playing her pathetic little game. Pretending to be a victim or “threatened ” just to scrape together a few more likes. As far as I’m concerned, she can go F herself. She’s the bottom of the barrel — the scum of the earth. Her and every single one of her followers. Fuck all of you Jew hating Nazi cunts.

Saved - December 28, 2024 at 7:09 PM

@gregreese - Greg Reese

Elon Musk has always been a fraud. And has all the appearances of an MK Ultra puppet. https://t.co/r6CewzIEtm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk, often portrayed as a self-made genius, has a controversial background. Born in South Africa, he claims poverty despite his family's emerald mine. He attended the University of Pennsylvania on a full scholarship and dropped out of Stanford after two days. Musk co-founded Zip 2 with his brother, which was sold for $307 million, but he downplays parental financial support. He later merged his online bank, x.com, with Confinity, which became PayPal, but was ousted as CEO. Musk falsely claims to be a co-founder of Tesla, which was started by Marc Tarpenning and Martin Eberhard. He maneuvered to take control and rewrite the company's history. Musk's personal life is marred by claims about his father, and his ambitions include merging humans with AI. Critics label him a fraud, likening him to other controversial figures in modern society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some sort of eccentric heavyweight genius with humble beginnings, but this is demonstrably Elon Musk was born in South Africa where he claims he grew up extremely poor, but his family owned an emerald mine. As a teenager, Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New York City, and his father bragged how they had so much money we couldn't even close our safe. Musk claims to have had about a $100,000 of student loan debt, but he received a full scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania where he bought a 10 bedroom frat house with his friend Adeo Ressi and ran an illegal nightclub. The pop culture claim is that Elon has an IQ of a 155, but this has never been tested. And after being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he dropped out after 2 days. After dropping out, Elon began his first business venture with his brother Kimbal, Zip 2, which was essentially a digital version of the yellow pages. The brothers received tens of 1,000 of dollars from their parents, and yet Elon denies this. An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got involved to bring in investors. But Elon's code was no good, so they had to hire on professional coders to rewrite everything. Zip 2 was then sold for $307,000,000 to Compaq who later shut it down without ever earning a profit. Elon made $22,000,000, bought a $1,000,000 McLaren f 1 supercar, which made mainstream news before he totaled the uninsured vehicle. Musk then went on to create an online bank, x.com. He partnered with banking expert, Harris Fricker, Edward Ho, and Christopher Paine. All 3 ended up leaving the company after accusing Elon of lying to the media about the quality of their product. Elon claims he founded PayPal. Before the company was named PayPal, it was known as Confinity. It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. After losing 1,000,000 of dollars, Elon's x.com was bought by Confinity in a merger in 2,000. All Musk contributed at Confinity was his own power struggle. He made himself CEO and pushed to change the name to x.com. The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk while he was away on vacation. Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated that all references to founders of the company will be removed from their website, allowing Elon to claim credit, which so far is all he has ever achieved. Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as PayPal, went public, and sold to eBay for $1,500,000,000 Elon made 180,000,000 from the deal, which he then invested into Tesla, SpaceX, and failed company SolarCity. Elon falsely claims to be the founder of Tesla. Tesla was founded in 2003 by Marc Tarpenning and Martin Eberhard, who developed the Tesla Roadster. When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital, they approached Elon Musk, who had the fake credibility as PayPal's cofounder. Musk joined with the condition that he be named chairman of the board. In emails, Musk was upset that the media was not giving him credit for Tesla Motors and went after Martin Eberhard, replacing him as CEO. He then forced Eberhard out of the company and rewrote the company's history to have himself listed as an original cofounder. Martin to have himself listed as an original cofounder. Martin Eberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster, was promised the first Roadster off the assembly line, but Musk screwed him over on that as well and sent that car into space. Speaker 1: You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. Speaker 0: So who is Elon Musk? Elon describes his father as being an evil, abusive man. His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of being a pedophile and fathered a child with his stepdaughter who is 42 years younger than him. This spoiled, narcissistic failure, son of accused pedophile, wants to put computer chips in everyone's brain so that we can merge with artificial intelligence. His girlfriend is now bragging how this could all lead to a communist utopia. And strangely enough, former Nazi and head of NASA, Wernher von Braun, predicted a man named Elon would conquer Mars in a 1952 novel that he wrote, which is odd because NASA has partnered with Elon SpaceX to work towards colonizing Mars. Elon Musk, like everything else in today's modern society, is a fraud, a fake genius, just like fake philanthropist Bill Gates and his fake vaccines, brought to you by the fake news. Here's a pro tip for dealing with the stream media and all of pop culture. Assume it's a lie and research everything. Speaker 1: You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly.
View Full Interactive Feed