TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - February 17, 2023 at 1:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putinism has emerged from Russians' resentment over losing the Cold War. It's similar to the Dolchstolegende that fueled interwar German nationalism. Putin's neoimperial aspirations are nested in a sea of Russian national resentment over loss of power and prestige. The outcome of the war in Ukraine is crucial. If Russia wins, it will embolden them to press on into other countries. But if Russia is defeated, it could unleash centrifugal forces that would foreclose its path to empire. Arm Ukraine now.

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

🧵I’m increasingly convinced that #Putin and “Putinism” have been made possible by the accumulation of resentments across the Russian society. #Putinism has emerged from Russians’ inability to accept that they lost the Cold War because the Soviet Union could no longer compete 1/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

#Putinism is akin to the Dolchstoßlegende that emerged in Germany after its 1918 loss in Wold War I. It argued that the great German people were never defeated, but betrayed by cowardly politicians-stabbed in the back. That German legend fueled DEU interwar national resentment.2/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

Roughly within a decade after WWI the Dolchstoßlegende and the national resentment it fueled gave rise to Hitler and his attempt to re-litigate the outcome in 1918. Only the unequivocal defeat of Germany in 1945 buried the legend, foreclosing the path to empire through war.3/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

At a risk of over-rationalizing history, I’d argue that for the past 30 yrs Russia has travelled a trajectory similar to that of interwar Germany. Putin’s neo-imperial aspirations are nested in a sea of RUS national resentment over loss of power & prestige on the world stage. 4/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

The Russian story that Putin has been pushing is one of the West, having taken advantage of Russia’s weak leaders (Gorbachev, Yeltsin, etc) robbed Russia of it glory to diminish its “velikiy russkiy narod,” That it is now poised to destroy RUS civilization. 5/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

If I’m right, the Russian threat to its neighbors and its neo-imperial drive will not end regardless whether Putin remains in power or not. In the long duree of Russian history, it can only break if Russia is decisively defeated in #Ukraine- in a way that every Russian sees it 6/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

That’s why so much is riding on the outcome of the war in #Ukraine. If Russia wins it will see this as a civilizational victory over the West. It will be emboldened to press on into #Georgia, #Moldova and down even breaching the @NATO line. 7/

@andrewmichta - Andrew A. Michta

But if Russia is defeated in #Ukraine, the collapse of the legend of “velikiy russkiy narod” could unleash centrifugal forces in RUS that would foreclose its path to empire. It would be a period of instability & risk but it would offer Europe a path to peace. #ArmUkraineNow End

Saved - October 11, 2024 at 11:27 PM

@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo

Putin’s Munich speech in 2007 … the speech that confronted the west harshly for the first time and marks the beginning of growing tensions. A must see for every geopolitical enthusiast. https://t.co/2byL4VOA3S

Saved - August 20, 2023 at 12:21 AM

@jacksonhinklle - Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸

“The West is ready to cross every line to preserve the neo-colonial system which allows it to live off the world, to plunder it thanks to the domination of the dollar and technology.” - Putin

Video Transcript AI Summary
The West is preparing to preserve a system that essentially exploits the world through the power of the dollar and technological dominance. They want to control independent states, traditional values, and cultural attempts by imposing protests, new global currencies, and technological centers. It is crucial for them to have all countries submit to the United States' benefit. They willingly agree or force others to comply, leaving behind ruins, disasters, and millions of suffering people. Their intention is to maintain unlimited power and engage in hybrid warfare against us. They don't want us to be a society, but rather a crowd without work. Our thoughts and culture pose a direct threat to them, so they try to suppress our art and development. Competition is not needed for them, but it is essential for us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Запад подготовку через для сохранения той не системы которая ему паразит по сути грабить мир за счет власти доллара и технологического дик. Собирать человечество дании. Извлекать основной источник не разработан благополучия. Рен Di. Сохранение этой тор аренды их ключевой под абсолютно коры мотивы. Вот почему их интересам отвечает тот де. Отсюда их агрессия к независимым государстве. К традиционным ценно и к культура попытки подо не контрольные им интер и ин протесты новые мировые валюты и центры технологического развития. Им критически важно чтобы все страны дали свой пользу среднюю соединенных штатов. Прав верхушки одни. Добровольно соглашаются это сделать. Добровольно сложилось стать масштаба. Другие покупают за, а если не получается разрушают целые. Оставляя после себя г катастрофы руины миллионы и человеческих суде те а зоны бедствия, протектора колонии и полу, на им все равно лишь бы получать свою выгоду. Хочу еще раз подчеркнуть именно. В намерен не сохранить свою ничем не ограничен власть и есть под длинные причины гибрид войны которую коллектив запад ведет против расти. Они желают нам года хотят видеть на скалу хотя равно сотрудничества о гр хотят видеть нас не обществом от толпой без работ. Для них прямая угроза наша мысль и с. Поэтому по наших философ. Наша культура для них представляет опасности искусства, поэтому пытаются запретить. Наше развитие процветания тоже для него угрозы. Конкуренция им вообще не нужна расти она нужна нам
Saved - September 6, 2023 at 3:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The collapse of the Soviet Union presented an opportunity for the Rockefeller empire to weaken Russia. The 1990s saw immense suffering for the Russian people as assets were transferred to offshore companies, stealing the nation's wealth. Vladimir Putin emerged as a nationalist leader, challenging the criminal oligarchs and their foreign backers. He curtailed Rothschild's control and thwarted attempts to control Russia's oil and gas resources. Putin's actions disrupted the grand geopolitical strategy of the US to encircle and weaken Russia. The CIA-backed color revolutions in Eurasia aimed to destabilize Russia's periphery. Putin shifted from defense to offense, leveraging energy resources to secure a stronger geopolitical position. The US sought control over Russian oil, gas, and pipelines, but Putin's actions and strategic errors hindered their plans. The article highlights the power struggle between Putin and the Rockefeller and Rothschild families, as well as the importance of Ukraine and Georgia in the geopolitical landscape.

@CalliFanciulla - Péonia

🔴 Russie / Poutine et l'Ouest de Sam Parker (🇺🇸) c'est de loin la meilleure analyse du conflit actuel en #Ukraine et des événements mondiaux que j'ai lu jusqu'à présent, car tout est expliqué en ordre chronologique et situé dans un contexte historique. 📍La chute de l'Union soviétique a marqué le début d'une nouvelle phase extrêmement dangereuse de l'agression américaine contre une Russie fortement affaiblie. Pour l'empire Rockefeller, il s'agissait d’une opportunité en or de détruire leur ancien adversaire, la Russie. S'ils arriveraient à détruire la Russie, ils croyaient pouvoir éliminer le seul obstacle sérieux à ce que Pentagone a appelé la domination du spectre entier - le contrôle total de la terre, de la mer, de l'air, de l'espace et de l’espace cybernétique par les USA. Une seule superpuissance pourrait dicter sa volonté au monde entier, les USA. C'était le rêve fou de David Rockefeller, celui de sa famille et ses alliés. Les années 1990 ont été une période d'immenses souffrances pour le peuple russe. Alors que l'effondrement imminent de l'URSS est devenu perceptible, des personnes à l'intérieur ont créé un groupe pour s'assurer du maintien de l’influence des fonctionnaires de l'âge soviétique en transférant les actifs de l'État russe vers des entreprises fantômes offshore, en volant ainsi la richesse du pays. Une telle société offshore, FIMACO, a été utilisée pour voler environ 50 milliards de dollars de l'argent de la nation. Ce vol a généré le capital liquide utilisé par les futurs oligarques pour construire leur fortune. Mihail Hodorkovski était l'un des premiers bénéficiaires de l'arrangement. Il a commencé sa carrière en tant que petit responsable soviétique dont le conglomérat de pétrole de Yukos était lié à FIMACO et FIMACO était liée à Jacob Rothschild à Londres. En 1991, l'Union soviétique s'est enfin effondrée. En août, le trésorier d'État Nikolai Kruchina, responsable des réserves d'or de la Russie, est mort en tombant de sa fenêtre. Il avait été membre du groupe de planification qui a initié le complot pour le vol des actifs de l'État. Son successeur, Georgy Pavlov, est tombé de la fenêtre deux mois plus tard: les oligarques faisaint le ménage. En septembre, la Banque Centrale Russe a annoncé que les réserves d'or de Kremlin ont diminué de 1 000 à 1500 tonnes à 240 tonnes. Deux mois plus tard, Victor Gerashchenko a annoncé que les réserves d'or de la Russie ont en fait entièrement disparu. Pendant que le peuple russe ait été terrifié par cette révélation, les banquiers européens semblaient moins surpris. Dans ces cercles, il se murmurait souvent que les avions soviétiques volaient depuis des mois vers et de la Suisse remplis de grandes quantités d'or. Boris Eltsin a annoncé ses projets de privatiser les actifs de la nation et a commencé le véritable vol. Au cours de la période de privatisation, les réseaux des deux familles n'ont pas perdu de temps et se sont jetés de manière opportuniste pour s’emparer des industries russes. L'administration Clinton a tenté de repenser les politiques économiques de la Fédération de Russie en cours de réformation en conformité avec le Consensus de Washington: la privatisation,la déréglementation, l'austérité et l'ouverture des entreprises russes à l’achat par des américains ultra-riches. Les investisseurs étrangers sont arrivés en mass avec un niveau de cupidité vraiment incroyable. Poutine rentre dans le jeu. Dès le début de son mandat en mai 2000, Vladimir Poutine, nationaliste avec une longue carrière dans les services secrets russes, s’est confronté à la difficile tâche d'essayer d'annuler (ou au moins limiter) les dommages que les acolytes criminels d'Eltsin et leurs partenaires étrangers ont causé à la Russie. Poutine jette dehors Rothschild. La criminalité ne s'est pas limitée aux spéculateurs étrangers. Au début de la période de privatisation des années 90, les Rothschilds ont organisé une société secrète de sept oligarques russes qui contrôlaient 🔽

@CalliFanciulla - Péonia

2. l’administration Boris Eltsin. Le groupe était auto-intitulé Semibankirschina, d’après les noms des sept boyars qui dirigeaient la Russie au 17ème siècle. La société secrète comprenait les oligarques suivants: Boris Berezovski, Mihail Hodorkovski, Mihail Fridman, Petr Aveni, Vladimir Gusinski, Vladimir Potanin et Alexandru Smolenski. Ils travaillaient tous pour Rothschild - ou Londres. Plus précisément, pour Jacob Rothschild. Mais Vladimir Poutine devint président russe et la chance de ces dirigeants auto-proclamés a rapidement changé. Un nouveau groupe s’est formé avec de personnes de l'entourage de Poutine - Slivoki (formé par des nationalistes russes du monde de la sécurité et des affaires) et a commencé à remplacer le précédent, Semibankrschina. De sa position de force, Poutine a négocié un "grand deal" avec les oligarques restants: ils ont gardé la plupart de leurs actifs existants en échange de leur ralliement à la gouvernance verticale de la Russie par Poutine. L’ère du gangstérisme financier des années ‘90 était terminée. En 2001, l’état à pris le contrôle des médias jusqu’alors contrôlés par les marionnettes de Rothschild. Les actions de Poutine au début du mois de mars 2000, ont conduit à une rupture du contrôle de Rothschild sur la Russie car tous ces oligarques qui pillaient aveuglément la Russie appartenaient à Jacob Rothschild. Quant à David Rockefeller il ne voulait pas être dérangé avec de tels « petites affaires ». Pour lui, la clé était d'amener la Russie dans le monde du dollar - beaucoup plus rentable pour son empire et une série de confrontations géopolitiques aux frontières de la Russie a beaucoup servi l'empire de Rockefeller. Les premières furent les guerre tchétchènes de 1994 et 1999/2000 auxquelles Poutine a mis fin rapidement et sans pitié. L'occupation militaire de l'Iraq a été la première étape majeure de la stratégie américaine pour déplacer le pétrole dans les sociétés pétrolières des deux familles, Rockefeller et Rothschild, événement qui a causé la perte des investissements russes en Irak après l'invasion américaine de mars 2003, suivie par l'invasion de l'Afghanistan d'octobre 2001, le Pentagone a commencé à élargir sa présence en Asie centrale - créant le mécontentement de la Russie et de la Chine. Pour des raisons militaires et politiques évidentes, Washington ne pouvait pas ouvertement admettre que, depuis la chute de l'Union soviétique en 1991, son objectif stratégique était de démanteler ou de détruire la Russie, obtenant ainsi un contrôle effectif sur ses énormes réserves de pétrole et de gaz. Les deux guerres n'étaient que les débuts d'une série d'une "conflits géopolitiques du pétrole et des pipelines" - des guerres non déclarées, néanmoins des guerres dans tous les sens du terme. Il y e des conflits armés, ouverts et cachés, sur les territoire de l'Eurasie, le Moyen-Orient et l'Afrique. Les guerres ont été menées avec des nouvelles méthodes sophistiquées de déstabilisation politique des régimes non coopératifs avec ce qui a été appelé, les révolutions de couleur. L'objectif était simple: le contrôle de Rockefeller, via le Pentagone et la CIA, sur tous les gisements importants pétroliers et gaziers, ainsi que les pipelines pour leur transport, afin de pouvoir contrôler le géant économique émergeant eurasien, en particulier la Chine et la Russie. L'objectif devaient être atteint par tous les moyens. L’encerclement de la Russie par de l'OTAN, les révolutions de couleur partout en Eurasie et la guerre en Iraq sont devenus tous les aspects de l'une et la même stratégie géopolitique américaine: une stratégie grandiose pour détruire la Russie une fois pour toujours car potentiel rival d’une hégémonie unique d’un super pouvoirs américain. Mais la fin de l'ère Eltsin a représenté le hic dans les grands projets de Washington. Suite au pillage de la Russie guidé par Wall Street et la City of London par les réseaux des deux familiaux, un Poutine, plus intelligent et sobre est apparu 🔽

@CalliFanciulla - Péonia

3. avec prudence comme une force nationaliste dynamique, engagée à reconstruire la Russie. Un événement déterminant dans la géopolitique énergétique Russe a eu lieu en 2003. Poutine a ordonné l'arrestation spectaculaire de l’oligarque russe, Mihail Khordokovsk - ou MK, accusé d'évasion fiscale. Poutine a ensuite gelé les actions du gigantesque groupe pétrolier de Khorokovsky, le mettant sous contrôle de l'État. Qu'est-ce qui a déclenché l'action si forte et radicale de Poutine ? MK travaillait pour Jacob Rothschild. Il était le paravent de Rothschild. En mars 2000, MK était présent avec tous les autres oligarques à une réunion organisée par Poutine. Les oligarques avaient pris l’engagement devant Poutine qu’ils ne se mêleraient pas de la politique russe et qu’ils allaient rapatrier une partie de l'argent volé pendant l’époque Eltsin, ainsi ils seront autorisés à conserver leurs actifs. Tous ces oligarques ont servi de paravent pour Rothschild. La plupart d’entre eux ont accepté ce deal, à l'exception des oligarques juifs de Rothschild. Poutine les a mis en garde pour avoir violé leur engagement envers lui. MK faisait partie d’eux et voulait « acheter » la Douma - le Parlement Russe comme première étape pour se présenter aux élections contre Poutine en 2004. Entre-temps, Mihail Hodorkovski négociait avec deux sociétés pétrolières Rockefeller - Exxon et Chevron, pour vendre 40% de Yukos Huile (en échange de 25 milliards de dollars). Si la transaction avait abouti, l'indépendance économique et financière de la Russie aurait pris fin. Cette participation de 40% aurait offert à Washington, aux géants pétroliers américains et à la famille Rockefeller un pouvoir de veto de facto sur les futurs accords pétroliers, gaziers russes et pipelines. Au moment de son arrestation, Yukos venait de commencer les démarches pour acquérir Sibneft, une très grande entreprise de pétrole Russe. L'entreprise combinée Yukos-Sibneft, avec 20 milliards de barils de pétrole et de gaz, aurait détenu la deuxième plus grande réserve de pétrole et de gaz dans le monde - dans des mains privées, pas d'état. L'achat par Exxon de Yukos-Sibneft aurait été un véritable coup d'état dans le domaine de l'énergie. David Rockefeller et Jacob Rothschild le savaient très bien. La Maison Blanche et MK aussi. Mais Vladimir Poutine le savait aussi et c’est pour cette raison qu’il a agit de manière décisive et à bloqué toute l’opération, il a décidé d’arrêter MK en octobre 2003. Lors de la purification des oligarques et des capitalistes vautours, le véritable pouvoir derrière Mihail Hodorkovski a été obligé de s’est manifester. Lorsqu'il est devenu probable qu'il serait arrêté, il s’est organisé pour que toutes les actions reviennent à la société Yukos Petroleum soient transférées à Jacob Rothschild. Le transfert a eu lieu en novembre 2003, donnant à Jacob Rothschild un contrôle de 40 à 45% des Yukos, dont la valeur était estimée à 25 milliards de dollars. Par la suite, Poutine a liquidé et nationalisé Yukos en confisquant et en vendant ses actions aux sociétés pétrolières d’état. Poutine a rendu à la Russie ce qui a été volé par Jacob Rothschild. Une fois devenu l’homme le plus riche du pays, la chance de Mihail Hodorkovski a tourné. En 2003, Poutine a poursuivi Hodorkovski pour évasion fiscale et fraude, ce dernier a fait 10 ans de prison ensuite il a été exilé. Au moment où ont eu lieu les enchères truquées de la vente d'actifs de l'État en 1995/96, la plupart des entreprises ont été vendues pour seulement 5% de leur valeurs et Yukos a été "achetée" pour moins de 400 millions de dollars, tandis que sa valeur réelle était beaucoup plus élevée. Poutine a donc déclaré la guerre aux familles les plus puissantes de la planète. À partir de ce moment, nous assistons à une lutte entre Poutine et les deux familles. Poutine a survécu à de nombreuses tentatives d'assasinat de la part des ces deux réseaux. Depuis que Poutine a arrêté Hodorkovsky en 2003, le Kremlin a de nouveau 🔽

@CalliFanciulla - Péonia

4/4 mis les mécanismes de contrôle économique entre les mains de l'État. L'un des premiers points de l'ordre du jour de Poutine a été de payer intégralement les dettes au FMI et aux prêts en suspens de la période soviétique, se libérant ainsi des interférences de Rothschild. Cela a permis à Poutine de réduire l'influence des deux familles sur la Russie. Les événements russes ont été suivis bientôt par les déstabilisations secrètes financées par la CIA en Eurasie - des révolutions de couleur contre les gouvernements de la périphérie de la Russie. Poutine a commencé une série de mouvements défensives pour restaurer une forme d'équilibre face à la politique toujours évidente de Washington pour encercler et affaiblir la Russie. Les erreurs stratégiques ultérieures des États-Unis ont facilité le tâche de la Russie. Maintenant, avec les enjeux croissants des deux côtés - voir l'OTAN et la Russie - la Russie de Poutine est passée de la simple défense à une offensive dynamique destinée à assurer une position géopolitique plus viable en utilisant comme levier les ressources énergétiques. Jusqu'en 2003, après l'occupation de l'Iraq par les forces américaines et britanniques, la priorité la plus urgente pour les États-Unis était le contrôle du pétrole russe du gaz et des pipelines associés. Pour que cela arrive, un petit coup d'état en Géorgie était considéré comme essentiel, ainsi qu'un coup d’état similaire en Ukraine. Si, dans les deux pays, des régimes pro-américains étaient installés, non seulement la sécurité militaire de la Russie serait menacée de façon mortelle, mais également la capacité de la Russie à contrôler les exportations de pétrole et de gaz vers l'UE aurait été gravement entravée. En janvier 2004, la révolution de Roses a amené au pouvoir en Géorgie le candidat du Washington, Mikheil Saakashvili. Avec leur homme fermement installé à Tbilisi - BP et l’anglo-américain Oil Consortium ont rapidement finalisé un oléoduc de 1 800 km de Bakou via Tyblisi à Ceyhan de la Méditerranée turque, à un coût d'environ 3,6 milliards de dollars. Avec la construction du pipeline (BTC), un élément important est apparu dans l'affaiblissement de l'indépendance du pétrole et de l'énergie de la Russie. En novembre 2004, la CIA a mis son homme au pouvoir en Ukraine. Le coup d’état à eu le nom, la révolution orange. Pour la Russie, l'Ukraine a une importance stratégique plus grande que la Géorgie et cela est dû à plusieurs pipelines de pétrole et de gaz qui transitent l'Ukraine vers l'UE. Couper ces pipelines à la frontière avec l'Ukraine aurait porté un coup dur à la Russie qui ne pouvait pas se permettre une telle perte. Étant donné que la Pologne fait déjà partie de l'OTAN, une adhésion à l'OTAN de l'Ukraine et de la Géorgie aurait entourée presque complètement la Russie avec des voisins hostiles, créant une menace existentielle pour la survie même de la Russie. Poutine le savait mais ses options étaient limitées. Washington connaissait les enjeux et a tout fait pour imposer son agenda, moins de commencer la guerre contre un adversaire avec des capacités nucléaires.

Saved - October 6, 2023 at 12:01 AM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Putin just announced that he and his allies are "building a new world" "We have engaged in the creation of a new more fairer world."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Participants of the meeting, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to this special anniversary session of the International Val Club.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Участники плена заседания коллеги дамы господа раз приветствовать тех вас случае на юбилей как уже только что было сказано нашем ведущим двадцатом ежегодно заседании международного клуба вал.
Saved - November 16, 2023 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
They met a man who rescued Russia from the turmoil of the 90s, rebuilding the economy and uniting the nation. He created a formidable military with limited resources, defying Western discrimination. Russia now challenges Western dominance, ushering in a multipolar world order. These girls unknowingly met Putin, one of the greatest leaders in modern history.

@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven

They didn't meet a movie star or singer, no actor or celebrity. Instead, they met the man whom pulled Russia back from the brink during the terrible 90s and helped stand them on their feet. He turned an economy and country that was being pillaged and picked alive by the west after the fall of the Soviet Union and stopped the oligarchs from selling Russias soul for money. He helped to build the strongest, most well trained and deadly military the world has ever known and at a fraction of the budget others use and in the face of massive discrimination by the west he united Russians and helped them remember whom they are and to be proud. Now Russia is the tip of the spear that is ending western dominance and being replaced by a multipolar world order. They may not realize it yet, but this is whom these little girls met, they met one of the greatest leaders in modern history, they met Putin. 👏💪🔥 #UkraineRussianWar #ukraine #russia #Zelensky #putin #nato #BRICS #china #india #africa #Trump #biden #EU #IsraeliCrimes #Palestine #Israel #PalestineUnderAttack #Palestina #Gazagenocide #gaza

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 2:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin's thought-provoking questions shed light on why the West dislikes him. Ironically, the very nations responsible for coups, wars, and destruction claim moral superiority. Who anointed the West as global masters? Why is their way always deemed right? Americans wonder why they're disliked, but fail to question their global dominance. With bases worldwide, imposed policies, and cultural influence, the West leaves a trail of devastation. Putin's query, "Who do you think you are?" resonates deeply.

@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven

Putin asks the simple but logical and important questions, questions that tell you exactly why the west hates him and would love him to be removed. It's ironic that the countries most responsible for coups, wars, assassinations, displacing of people, overthrowing of governments and destruction of countries and economies are also the ones whom claim to be the moral arbiters. Whom made the west the masters of the world, whom laid the crown at the feet of the west and said, "Rule us, lead us, be the example?" Why is it that every way is wrong unless it is the western way? Americans especially say, "The world hates us!" But never do they stop to ask why? You're bases blanket the world, your troops stationed all over, your policies forced upon everyone, your culture and degeneracy exported abroad and the trail of dead could wrap around the world a thousand times. So to ask the question that Putin asks, "Who do you think you are?" #UkraineRussianWar #ukraine #russia #Zelensky #putin #nato #BRICS #china #india #africa #Trump #biden #EU #IsraeliCrimes #Palestine #Israel #PalestineUnderAttack #Palestina #Gazagenocide #gaza

Video Transcript AI Summary
We constantly hear our name being mentioned. We are expected to do something. We are obligated. Our actions are taken seriously. We have the right to warn someone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Имя мы слышим все время звучит. Вы должны. Вы обязаны. Мы вас серьезно пред. Вот тут такие имеете права кого-то пред предупреждение
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 2:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin criticizes the US political system, claiming it is exposed as "rotten" due to the persecution of President Trump. He believes the world sees this except for Democrat voters. #PoliticalCritique #USPolitics #PersecutionOfTrump

@BelannF - BelannF

PUTIN MAY BE AN EVIL MAN, BUT HE SEES WHAT THE WHOLE WORLD SEES. The persecution of President Trump 45 has exposed the US political system as "Rotten". Putin said, "They cannot pretend to teach anyone about Democracy. Everything that is happening with Donald Trump in front of the whole world. The whole world sees except Democrat Voters!"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Regarding Trump, what is happening now in today's conditions is good in my opinion. It shows the flaws of the American political system, which cannot claim to teach others about democracy. Everything happening with Trump is politically motivated, and it is being done in front of the eyes of the American public and the whole world. They have simply exposed their internal problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: То что касается п трампа но это конечно для нас то что происходит в сегодняшних условиях на мой взгляд это хорошо почему? Потому что это показывает всю г американская политической система, которая не может претендовать на то, чтобы учить других демократии все что происходит с храм это п по политическим мотивам своего политического вот что это такое и делается на глазах общественность Сша и всего мира они просто об обнаружили свои проблемы внутрь
Saved - February 7, 2024 at 11:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The original Putin, a deranged mobster, was executed in 2011. His replacement, Putin 2.0, was brought in to clean up Russian corruption. Russian media celebrated this, while the US remained silent. Putin 2.0 has made Russia flourish and is an ally to President Trump in fighting the Cabal. Putin has made bold statements against the Deep State, calling them a cult. He believes that the ruling class are cold-blooded hybrids manipulating mankind. Putin's actions and statements show his commitment to exposing and fighting against the Cabal.

@kathrynwise6869 - Ice Kates

“THE TWO PUTINS” ~ by Freya Ferdinand II On to the story... The original Putin was said to have been deranged mobster and gangster, according to members of the Russian government. He would kill anyone who got in his way or anyone he simply wasn’t a fan of. Everyone around him lived in fear of their lives. Russian officials got together and filed charges against Putin for all the murders he’d committed. Below, you will see pictures of Putin jailed inside of a courtroom. A #guilty verdict was quickly handed down and Putin was “swiftly” executed that evening in December 2011, for crimes against humanity and extreme torture of his victims. I first found a video on YouTube of Mrs. Putin claiming the new Putin was not her husband and that he was removed from their home one night in 2010 by Russian officials and he was never seen by her again. A few weeks later, a different man was dropped off to their home and the military tells her the man is her husband. It is clear to her he is not. She says she sleeps on the couch from that day forward, as there is a stranger in her bed. She eventually works up the nerve to tell him she wants a divorce because she will not be married to a complete stranger. Mrs. Putin stated the man agreed by saying he was relieved because he was not attracted to her. The Putins suddenly divorce not long after Putin was replaced. Mrs. Putin disappears with her two daughters, which no one has ever seen since that time and is never seen again herself. Putin 2.0 then began dating a much younger woman whom he seemed much happier with. Everyone believed Putin merely traded up as most men in power seem to do without a second thought, but no one realized this was not the same person at all. I noticed that no one in United States was talking about this! However, Russian media, from where I learned of this story, was all abuzz with this information. They knew the Putin we see today was NOT the real Putin and they were celebrating this fact. Why? Because the second Putin—the replacement Putin, was brought in to clean house and clear out Russian corruption, the same exact way Trump was placed in power to do in the great U.S. of A. Coincidence? Absolutely not! Putin made Russia great again!! He kicked the Deep State out of Russia, although they do still very much exist today, but more so on “fringe” outskirts of Russian and within neighboring countries like Ukraine. Putin kicked “Deep State butt” and Russia has been flourishing for quite some time ever since! According to Russian citizens, Russia is now a safe and decent place to live thanks to Putin 2.0. Many do not know, but President Trump has been taking queues from Putin 2.0 and what Russia was able to do to free themselves from Deep State oppression over the past 9 years. I realized Putin was cleaning up Russia when he forbade the United States from adopting children from Russian orphanages. There was overwhelming evidence these Russian children were being adopted in droves by Satanists and high-level Luciferians in atheism states to be used in Satanic Ritual. It was heartbreaking, but when Putin found out what was going on with these adoptions, he shut down the ability for the US to adopt the children, and brought the entire ring to a screeching halt. Putin is one who understands the deep sickness that permeates the Cabal. No time for mercy. If one doesn’t put these people down, they’ll simply move their operations next door (like to Ukraine), it is truly of no consequence to them. Trump and Putin were the only two “Super Power” leaders, leading the fight against the Cabal together for the first few years. I believe this #plan has been in works for decades and as soon as Putin was replaced and Trump was installed, just as from Dark to Light, the real game of saving this planet could begin. Even if you have a hard time believing the real Putin was executed and replaced, believe me when I say I researched this subject well, but more importantly—Thank goodness 📷 he was! There’s very good reason many in danger, seeking diplomatic protection have fled to Russia. Putin 2.0 has proven to be an ally, mentor and friend to President Trump like no one else. This is also the reason Hillary and company called their fake election tampering collusion hoax, a “Russian” collusion, if you catch my drift. They know Trump and Putin are linked together in crushing the Cabal for once and for all. Take a look what Putin had to say and these are a few of many very vocal statements Putin has brazenly made against the Deep State: "PUTIN SAID THAT HE WAS NOT ONE OF “THEM”, BUT THEY ARE AFRAID OF HIM AND HAVE ATTEMPTED TO LURE HIM INTO THEIR “ANCIENT BABYLONIAN CULT.” Shockwaves are reverberating around the Kremlin today as word spreads regarding an extraordinary meeting called by Vladimir Putin yesterday where, according to sources, the Russian president said that “95% of the world’s ruling class are not even human,” but are “cold-blooded hybrids” who are “members of an ancient cult.” Did Putin just out the world’s political and financial elite as cold-blooded hybrid human reptilians? Did he really just go there? Speaking at a behind closed doors forum for the highest echelons of government and staff in his home city of St. Petersburg, Putin responded to questions about the Panama Papers leak by pointing out who was behind the plot: the U.S. government, their spy agencies, and George Soros’s OCCRP. Putin slammed his fist on the table and exclaimed, “George Soros, you sly dragon, this is war,” according to sources close to the President. Putin then vowed to ramp up sanctions against Soros’s Open Society even further. When questioned by a top aide as to what he meant by “dragon” (an unusual word in Russian), Putin sighed heavily and fixed the assembled group with his trademark stare before explaining that all is not what it seems in regards to how the world is run. Resisting gentle attempts by close aides to stop the President ‘going there,’ Putin said that the evidence was everywhere, and that he personally had intimate knowledge of their dealings. He said that he was not one of them, but they are afraid of him and have attempted to lure him into their “ancient Babylonian cult.” “The evidence, ancient and modern, is enormous,” he said. Putin said that mankind has been manipulated to become “unconscious” through the use of programming by media and politics, the perfect example of which was the recent Panama Papers leak. The world’s ruling class have tyrannical control over our food, water, and air supply, and they are actively dumbing down the masses." Please click on all photos below. It is important to note when looking at the pictures, there was only a two month time period when the old Putin was executed and the new Putin arrived. ‘‘Twas not years between them but only months.” More photos in comments.

Saved - June 14, 2024 at 9:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In an unearthed video clip, Margaret Thatcher criticizes Putin, searching for a "trace of humanity" in his early days as Russian president. The clip was recorded in 2000 at Millsaps College in Mississippi.

@yasminalombaert - Yasmina

Putin torn apart by Margaret Thatcher in an unearthed video clip: ‘Trying to find a trace of humanity' A clip of ex-British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher launching a scathing attack on Putin during his early days as Russian president surfaced again. "I looked at the pictures of Mr. Putin trying to look for a trace of humanity.” The video was recorded at Millsaps College in Jackson, Mississippi on September 20, 2000.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the slow response of the new Soviet leader, Putin, to a submarine tragedy. In the West, immediate action is taken in such calamities, but in this case, help arrived late, showing a lack of value for human life. The speaker highlights the contrast in attitudes towards human life between the West and the Soviet Union, emphasizing the need for more to be done to prioritize human lives. Translation: The speaker criticizes the slow response of the new Soviet leader, Putin, to a submarine tragedy. In the West, immediate action is taken in such calamities, but in this case, help arrived late, showing a lack of value for human life. The speaker highlights the contrast in attitudes towards human life between the West and the Soviet Union, emphasizing the need for more to be done to prioritize human lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now we have the new mister Putin. I looked at the pictures of mister Putin trying to look for a trace of humanity. I should within a few weeks have known better because you know what happened. They had the terrible tragedy of the submarine going down straight to the to the floor, whether there was an explosion inside or not, we don't know. But it was very interesting what happened. If ever there's a calamity in the West, the whole of the armed forces will go. They'll take everything there immediately. The politicians immediately will get together and say, what help do we want? They can have anything we can give. If we haven't got the help, we'll get it from someone else. There would be anxiety because what mattered was not the submarine, but the lives of those in. And the interesting thing was that the new leader of the Soviet Union didn't act quickly. This is very soon a comment. He didn't try to mobilize everyone else. We didn't know whether we could help, but we were all ready to go and help and sent some of the small submarines that we had just for such an occasion. But that, my friends, was very, very revealing indeed. They still do not value human life in the same way that we do. And so all the help got there, I'm afraid, really rather late. And I'm have done but didn't. And that, again, shows that the have done but didn't. And that again shows that the Soviet Union and the peoples of the Soviet Union are very much aware of what could be done. A great deal more could be done than is being done at the moment.
Saved - June 9, 2024 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia has become an enemy of the West due to its size and resources, which have historically attracted conquest. The US Neo-Cons had plans to control Russia's resources, but Putin's refusal to submit to US hegemony changed the game. Putin's speech at the OSCE Security Conference in 2007 solidified his status as the new enemy of the West.

@MEtirol - etirol 𝕊

⁉️ How did Russia become an enemy of the West ⁉️ There are solid reasons why the hegemonic West is so hostile towards Russia. The sheer size of the country with all its resources has always been an incentive for the West to conquer it. Napoleon and Hitler proved this in the past. More recently, it was the US Neo-Cons who had a firm plan to take over Russia. In 1998, former US Secretary of State M. Albright is reported to have said at a meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Yevgeny Primakov: Russia has the greatest natural resources in the whole world and that annoys Albright. In her opinion, these resources should not be controlled by Russia alone in future, but by several countries, of course under the supervision of the USA. Under Yeltsin, the US and the west had full access to Russia and began to plunder the country with the help of the corrupt Russian oligarchs: (click link: https://t.co/5AvDwXYdL7 ). When Putin came to power, the game changed. He was not prepared to bend the knee to the US hegemon and insisted on Russia's sovereignty. Putin's legendary speech at the OSCE Security Conference in Munich in 2007 is impressive testimony to this. The Neo-Cons have never forgiven him for this and have systematically shaped him into the new enemy of the West with their media an think tanks. Here are the most important excerpts from Putin's speech at the OSCE Security Conference in Munich in 2007.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the unipolar model, stating it's impossible in today's world due to lack of moral foundations. They condemn the US for overstepping its boundaries in various aspects, making no one feel safe. NATO's expansion is seen as a provocation, with American bases near Russia's borders. The speaker asserts Russia's long history of independent foreign policy won't change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today's world. And this is not only because if there was individual leadership in today's and precisely in today's world, then the military, political and economic resources would not suffice. What is even more important is that the model itself is flawed because at its basis, there is and can be no moral foundations for modern civilization. One state and, of course, the first and foremost, the United States has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural, and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this? It results in the fact that no one feels safe. I want to emphasize this. No one feels safe because no one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course, such a policy stimulates an answer. But what is happening at the same time? Simultaneously, the so called flexible frontline American bases appear in Bulgaria and Romania with up to 5 1,000 men in each. It turns out that NATO has put its frontline forces on our borders and we continue to strictly fulfill the treaty obligations and do not react to these actions at all. I think it is obvious that NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernization of the alliance itself or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that And what And what happened to the assurances our Western partners made after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact? Where are those declarations today? Russia is a country with a history that spans more than a 1000 years and has practically always used the privilege to carry out an independent foreign policy. We are not going to change this tradition today.

@MEtirol - etirol 𝕊

@maneco1964 WHO FINANCED THE RUSSIAN OLIGARKS UNDER YELTSIN? “The protector was Lord Jacob Rothschild”: Khodorkovsky explains who ruled in the shadows before Putin attacked the oligarchs. The former head of Yukos, the oil company that produced 20% of Russia's oil, spoke out about how the…

Saved - October 7, 2024 at 1:25 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Greatest National Leader of Our Time Putin's 2007 Munich Speech: Stark Prophecy or Reasonable Warning That Fell on Deaf Ears? PHENOMINAL speech. EVERYONE needs to hear it!

Saved - November 7, 2024 at 6:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I declared the death of the New World Order just two days after the election results and a day after Elon Musk's cryptic tweet. The Global Order is a thing of the past, and I believe the “moment of truth” is approaching. I support Donald Trump’s foreign policy, focusing on diplomacy over force.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Vladimir Putin declared the death of the New World Order just two days after the election results and a day after Elon Musk’s cryptic "Novus Ordo Seclorum" tweet. Putin says the New World Order is a thing of the past, the “moment of truth” is approaching, and he backs Donald Trump’s foreign policy, emphasizing a stance that avoids the use of force. The Global Order is dead.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The moment of truth is approaching as the previous world order fades away. We are witnessing a fundamental clash of principles that will shape international relations in the future. This conflict goes beyond power struggles and geopolitical influence; it will determine whether we can create a world that fosters development and resolves contradictions through mutual respect for cultures and civilizations, without coercion or force. The outcome will be crucial for our collective future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A certain extent, the moment of truth is coming. The previous world order is irreversibly becoming a thing of the past. One could say has become a thing of the past. And the shaping of the new world order has become the scene of uncompromising fright. Uncompromising, 1st and foremost, for the reason that it's not even the battle for power or geopolitical influence. It's a clash of the very principles that would be the foundation between the relation for the relation of the countries at the next historical stage. And its outcome will define whether all of us jointly can build a world that would allow everyone to develop and to solve the outstanding contradictions based on mutual respect of cultures and civilization without coercion and use of force.
Saved - November 9, 2024 at 2:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed Putin's strong stance against what he calls the globalist cabal, labeling them as criminals behind a failed coup to establish a New World Order. He emphasized that their actions violate international law and warned that they will face consequences in upcoming trials, referred to as Nuremberg 2.0. Putin believes these trials are essential for restoring global law and order and protecting humanity from a bleak future of oppression and spiritual decline.

@tpvsean - TPV Sean

🚨 Putin Vows To Punish Failed 'New World Order' Criminals in Nuremberg 2.0 Trials The globalist cabal are criminals who attempted to take over the world in a coup d'etat according to Russian President Vladimir Putin who warned the elite that their New World Order has failed and they must pay the price for their crimes against humanity. According to Putin, the cabal’s failed coup d'etat directly contravenes international law and places them firmly in the crosshairs of a robust criminal trial aimed at restoring global law and order – not to mention saving humanity from a future of slavery and spiritual impoverishment.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin claims that a globalist cabal attempted a coup, warning that their new world order has failed and they must face justice for their crimes against humanity. He asserts that the elite's days of power are over, especially with Trump's potential return to the presidency, which could end the war in Ukraine and prevent a larger conflict. Putin criticizes Biden as corrupt and praises Trump as a strong leader. He believes the globalists, likened to Nazis, aim to control nations through destructive policies. Putin has taken measures to protect Russian sovereignty, including banning harmful ideologies and promoting family values. He remains committed to dismantling the new world order, urging the public to recognize the elite's true intentions and support efforts to hold them accountable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The globalist cabal are criminals who attempted to take over the world in a coup d'etat according to Russian president Vladimir Putin, who warned the elite that their new world order has failed and they must pay the price for their crimes against humanity. According to Putin, the cabal's failed coup d'etat directly contravenes international law and places them firmly in the crosshairs of a robust criminal trial aimed at restoring global law and order, not to mention saving humanity from a future of slavery and spiritual impoverishment. Before we dive in, join the People's Voice locals community if you haven't already and sign up to become a member of the world's first ever cybernation that truly believes in life, liberty, and the pursuit of your dreams. Visit joson.com and click the join us button today. It's completely free. For decades, this cabal has flown around the world in private jets, dined at the finest tables, and all the while, they've been pushing an agenda of extreme depopulation. They warn that those who survive will be confined to 15 minute cities, forced into vaccinations, eating bugs, and stripped of basic rights and dignity. Speaking at the Vao Dye Discussion Club 2 days after the US election, Putin said the elite's halcyon days are behind them, and the heat is about to get cranked up to 11. Speaker 1: To a certain extent, the moment of of truth is coming. The previous world order is irreversibly becoming a thing of the past. One could say has become a thing of the past, and the shaping of the new world order has become the scene of uncompromising fight. Speaker 0: The global elite are intent on steering humanity straight into World War 3, hoping a new world order will rise like a phoenix from the ashes. The Biden regime played their part perfectly, funneling billions into global conflicts, stoking the fires, and waiting for the powder keg to blow. Unfortunately for the elites, with the election of Trump, the era of global war and conflict is now officially over. Speaker 2: What what he said about his, desire to rebuild relations with Russia, to facilitate an end to the Ukrainian crisis. I think this deserves attention at the very least, and I would like to take this opportunity to offer my congratulations on his election as president of the United States. And if he does what he has been promising, you know, before the inauguration, if he makes a phone call, if he says Vladimir, let's meet, you know, I wouldn't be I I don't think it would be beneath me to call him myself. Speaker 0: Putin knows Trump wants to stop the war in Ukraine, stop the needless slaughter, and save Americans 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars in taxpayer money that should be remaining in their own pockets. Just as Trump's election in 2016 saw ISIS crumble almost overnight, his 2024 win appears set to put an end to the war in Ukraine, stopping it in its tracks before it can turn into World War 3 that the elite are desperate to ignite. Speaker 3: But, you know, the fact that mister Trump as a presidential candidate says that he's ready and wants to stop the war in Ukraine, we take that very seriously. Well, I I haven't seen his ideas on how exactly he's going to do that, and that is the key question. But I have no doubt that he says that sincerely, and we support that. Speaker 0: Negotiating from a position of strength is easier when the man on the other line has respect for you as a man. Putin understood Biden was a corrupt bureaucrat whose sole achievement in 50 years of public life involved enriching his family members with foreign cash. And his sole achievement in private life was raising a family of drug addicts and child sex abuse victims. In contrast, Putin calls Trump courageous and a real man. For those raised on a steady diet of mainstream media, the truth about Putin tends to come as a shock. Some say that once you really understand who Putin is and what he's been fighting against, it's enough to make people question everything they've been told and finally wake up. This truth could be the ultimate red pill, the one that challenges the whole narrative. The real question is, just for how down the rabbit hole are you willing to go? Are you ready to uncover what Putin has in store for Schwab, Gates, Soros, and the liberal elite in the US, the ones failed in their coup d'etat, the ones who cross borders while committing atrocities that could well be called crimes against humanity in clear violation of international law. The globalists are trying to make us all poorer and destroy what's left of the economy. The Biden regime is following all of the w f dictates to the letter. They literally want you to own nothing and pretend to be happy. It's no joke. That's why I recently decided to put a lot of my own savings into precious metals, gold and silver. I don't trust the banks. I don't trust governments, and I don't trust big tech with my hard earned money. Why? Because the handful of people that I do trust to give me financial advice, Max Keiser for instance, have all said that gold is the best insurance against inflation and the stock market. So I decided to partner up with our sponsor, Colonial Metals Group. They helped me set up a self directed IRA where I have access to all of my assets no matter what restrictions the government impose on everybody else. Let the team of experts at CMG help you protect your family's future. And viewers of this channel are being given an exclusive offer. Click on the link below this video or call the 800 number, and you'll receive a safe and up to $10,000 in free silver. This offer is exclusive to viewers of The People's Voice. The number to call is 888-351-2043. That's 888-351-2043, or go to colonialmetalsgroup.comforward/tpv. The globalist elite have made life hell for the majority since George h w Bush announced the new world order in 1991. Their crimes surpassed even the darkest moments of the 20th century, and the majority of the population was, for years, successfully brainwashed through a sophisticated psyop involving Obama's amendment of the Smith Mundt Act and the Mockingbird Media. Speaker 4: 2013, it was legalized in the United States to propagandize its citizens. What? Like, that's some scary third world stuff going on. That's the kind of stuff that people use to topple governments to take away freedoms. Speaker 5: Yes. You heard that right. Almost a decade ago, propaganda was legalized in the United States with the passage of the Smith Munt Modernization Act, which you've probably never heard of. The Smith Munt Modernization Act was buried in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act for a good reason, because it repealed the 1948 Smith Munt Act, which authorized the State Department and the mainstream media to engage in propagandizing foreign countries, but it prohibited releasing that same propaganda in America for public consumption. This prohibition was lifted when the Smith Modernization Act was signed into law by Obama. Speaker 6: Very simply, Obama gave it a reboot in 2012. So no matter how outrageous the propaganda may be, it's completely legal. Speaker 7: Propaganda, in other words, a false narrative for whatever specific purpose, is now much much easier to perpetrate on the people. Speaker 0: The desperate attempt to brainwash the American public failed. And now our abuses have been backed into a corner. Their crimes have been exposed, and they are begging for mercy. They want us to forgive and forget, but that's not going to happen. It really isn't. The people have woken up. And since they woke up and realized that COVID pandemic was created intentionally by the elites and the 2020 election was brazenly stolen, the people are rising up and demanding justice. Speaker 8: Let me just say this to Big Tish James, the New York attorney general. I dare you, I dare you to try to continue your lawfare against President Trump in his second term. Because listen here, sweetheart, we're not messing around this time. And we will put your fat ass in prison for conspiracy against rights. And I promise you that. So think long and hard before you wanna violate president Trump's constitutional rights or any other Americans' constitutional rights. Speaker 0: At the international level, the people have a powerful ally in Vladimir Putin who is determined to hold the cabal into the dock to face justice for their crimes. It's worth keeping in mind that we've been here before when the Nazi leadership of the 3rd Reich were put on trial at Nuremberg. In all, 199 defendants were tried, 161 were convicted, and 37 were sentenced to death for crimes against humanity and war crimes. But the death of these key players of the 3rd Reich did not mean an end of Nazism. It was simply a ruse for the elite to retain control. Ultimately, the Nazis just rebranded and tried again under a new disguise. Nazi scientists and doctors were exported to the United States, and Europe was overrun by globalist organizations featuring children and grandchildren of the Nazi leadership. Schwab, Soros, and EU commission president Ursula von der Leyen are just a few examples of globalist leaders with direct ties to the Nazi leadership that was supposedly eradicated at Nuremberg. Putin has always seen through the disguise and recognized the global elite for what they really are, reanimated Nazis, determined to destroy nations from the inside with policies that entail child sex trafficking, child mutilation, forced transgender education, CRT, and the worship of Satan in all institutions, all so that they can achieve their sick vision of a new world order and global government. Speaker 9: On other nations. Forcing their rules on others. That they have forgotten what And that's a very active object of getting is a crime in its own right. Because if you're getting that time, they're forgetting the fight. It it it was necessary to be able to rid Europe of that scourge. Speaker 0: If a man can be measured by his enemies, Putin seems to be doing something right. Far left globalist billionaire George Soros has complained that Putin is thwarting the new world order from fulfilling its agenda. High praise indeed. Before his death, Jacob Rothschild also singled out Putin complaining bitterly about the Russian president's resolve in kicking the central banking cartel out of Russia and dismantling the new world order. But besides kicking out Soros and Rothschild, Putin banned GMOs, banned Bill Gates, and then issued an arrest warrant for him, fought cultural Marxism, and built over 15,000 churches during an era when Christianity is in decline in Western nations. He has also encouraged families to have more children, bans transgender propaganda to children, and called out the w f's normalization of pedophilia, declaring it the ultimate destruction of the family, designed to destroy all cultures and Between 1994 and 2014, Russia's GDP grew tenfold, and its world ranks surged from 22nd to 8th. Russia's debt to GDP ratio fell from 100% in 1999 to 17% in 2016. Foreign reserves grew from virtually nothing to the 6th largest in the world. Gold reserves grew to become the 6th largest in the world as well. In other words, Putin made Russia great again. This is why his approval rating is still over 80%. But he's not finished yet. Putin has long promised to destroy the new world order. And to do so, he knows the time has come to cut the head off the snake. Here are the people's voice. We are determined to continue reporting on the crimes of the globalist elite. Help us finish the job by ensuring they are brought to justice. Subscribe to the channel and join the People's Voice locals community to be part of our incredible team. I hope to see you there. Today's video is brought to you by IPV sixers. Are you a content creator who wants to publish information online without big brother spying and censoring your every move? Ipv6ers is set to revolutionize the way information is disseminated on the Internet by eliminating the need for big tech companies to provide unreliable, overpriced services such as self hosting email and data management. I p v sixes enables an easy and accessible way for you to host your own web and email server with direct end to end connections and enhanced security. This means no snooping for Big Brother and no interference from the technocratic elites. If Hillary Clinton can get away with running her own server, why shouldn't you? Go to the peoples voice dot tvforward/ipv6 to sign up or click the link below this video to take back control of the Internet and win the info wars against the globalists. If you like our content, help support our sponsor, ipv6ers, and go to the peoples of voice dot tvforward/ipv6 today. Thank you, ipv6ers, for making this video possible.
Saved - December 18, 2024 at 7:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The global military-political landscape is increasingly unstable, with ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and rising tensions elsewhere. The US and its allies are attempting to maintain dominance, imposing shifting rules while engaging in hybrid warfare against dissenting nations like Russia. In response, we are enhancing our military capabilities, increasing troop strength, and modernizing our forces with advanced technology. We are committed to nuclear deterrence and adapting our strategies based on lessons learned from current operations. Cooperation with allies is also a priority as we navigate these challenges.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

President Vladimir Putin: The military-political situation in the world remains challenging and unstable. Bloodshed continues in the Middle East, and there is a high potential for conflict in a number of other regions of the world. We observe the current US administration and practically the entire collective West attempting to maintain their global dominance. They continue to impose their so-called rules on the international community, which they change time after time, juggling them as they see fit. Properly speaking, there is just one stable rule – no rules whatsoever for those who engage in this behaviour, for those who believe they are at the head of the world, for those who regard themselves as God’s vicars on earth, although they do not believe in God themselves. At the same time, they conduct hybrid wars and implement containment policies against dissenting states, including Russia. In a bid to weaken our country and inflict a strategic defeat on us, the US continues to pump the actually illegitimate Kiev regime with weapons and money, as well as sending mercenaries and military advisors, thereby encouraging further escalation of the conflict. Simultaneously, under the pretext of a non-existent Russian threat, they scare their population with allegations that we intend to attack someone. This is a very simple tactical ploy: they push us to a red line that we cannot help but cross; when we begin to respond, they frighten their population with the Soviet – in the olden times – and with the Russian threat today. Meanwhile, NATO countries are boosting their military spending and the alliance’s assault groupings are being formed near the Russian border. For example, the number of US servicemen in Europe has exceeded 100,000. NATO’s ambitions have long surpassed its so-called historical responsibility zone. Apart from the so-called eastern flank, it is also building up its presence in the Asia-Pacific region. At America’s behest, new military-political alliances are being formed, which undermine the decades-old security architecture. Equally concerning is the US activity in developing high-precision ground-based strike systems with a firing range of up to 5,500 km and preparing them for deployment in forward zones. Moreover, the transfer and deployment of these missile systems are already being prepared in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Let me remind you that in the past, these measures were prohibited under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, which ceased to be in effect at the initiative of the United States. We have repeatedly stated that the termination of this treaty will have negative consequences for global security as a whole, while stressing that we will not deploy intermediate- and shorter-range missiles until American weapons of this kind appear in any region of the world. In fact, Russia has taken on these obligations unilaterally. However, as I said, if the United States begins to deploy such systems, then all our voluntary restrictions will be lifted. Given the escalating geopolitical tensions, we must adopt additional measures to ensure the security of Russia and its allies. We are doing this carefully and thoughtfully, without becoming drawn into a full-scale arms race that would damage the socioeconomic development of the country. We pay significant attention to improving the combat strength of the Armed Forces and increasing their capabilities. As part of these efforts, the Leningrad and Moscow military districts, as well as a number of new units and formations, have been created. The authorised strength of the Armed Forces has been increased to 1.5 million servicemen. The army and navy are being re-equipped with up-to-date weapons and equipment at an accelerated pace. For example, the share of such weapons in the strategic nuclear forces has already reached 95 percent. Meanwhile, we have specified the fundamental principles for the use of nuclear weapons envisaged in the updated Basic Principles of State Policy on Nuclear Deterrence. Let me stress once again, so that no one accuses us of trying to scare everyone with nuclear weapons: this is a policy of nuclear deterrence. General-purpose forces are developing at a rapid pace together with the nuclear triad. The troops are receiving advanced robotic systems, including those using artificial intelligence technologies, such as reconnaissance and attack UAVs, unmanned boats and multi-purpose robotic platforms. It is imperative to continue deploying progressive and systematic efforts with an eye towards enhancing the army and navy capabilities, to achieve the objectives of the special military operation, and to be prepared to provide a prompt and effective response to potential challenges to our country’s security. It is likewise imperative to focus on addressing the following priority tasks while working on the above objectives. First, strategic nuclear forces remain, without a doubt, a key tool for maintaining stability and protecting Russia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. We will keep maintaining their potential and balanced growth, and continue working on creating new deterrent force systems and complexes. It is likewise important to keep non-strategic nuclear forces on constant alert and to continue holding exercises involving their potential use. Second, earlier today, I spoke about the risks associated with the United States deploying medium-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. We will respond to such threats in a comprehensive manner. The most important task is to ensure the timely detection of the launch of such missiles and to intercept them. Also, it is necessary to streamline the serial production and the deployment of such domestically manufactured attack systems, including hypersonic systems. As is well known, Oreshnik medium-range missile system is Russia’s most recently deployed powerful weapon. In November, in response to the attacks using Western weapons which targeted our country’s territory, a ballistic hypersonic missile with a non-nuclear payload was successfully used. The serial production of such complexes to protect Russia and our allies’ security should begin in the near future. Without a doubt, this will be accomplished. Third, it is necessary to more widely implement the experience gained during the special military operation into the combat training of troops, as well as into the higher military training institutions’ curricula. Concurrently, it is necessary to improve the methods for conducting military operations, to update the fundamental statutory documents, and to raise the level of masterful use of weapons and equipment, as well as to increase the effectiveness of troop command and control, especially at the tactical and operational-tactical levels. To reiterate, talented officers and non-commissioned officers who have proved themselves in difficult combat situations must join the core command staff of the Armed Forces and teach at military training institutions. Fourth, the experience gained from conducting the special military operation should be fully considered when determining the priority areas for the development of domestic weapons and equipment, and the tactics for their use. For example, high-precision weapon systems employ new methods for guiding missiles at the end of their trajectory, enabling successful engagement against complex and fortified targets. The interference immunity of onboard missile weapon systems has been significantly improved, and new methods of communicating flight missions have been tested. In the future, it is essential to identify targets in real-time, which is a crucial task for our military-industrial complex. I will elaborate on this later. Another important innovation has been the direct exchange of information between the units directly involved in the special operation and the organisations within the defence industry complex that I previously mentioned. As a result, for a number of items, the average time for addressing identified defects has now been reduced to five to seven days. However, this is not sufficient; we must act even faster. There has been some progress in the organisation of equipment repair and its adaptation to the requirements of the combat situation. However, challenges remain, and these must be systematically addressed. Furthermore, we must continue to take all necessary steps to accelerate the introduction of advanced technologies and other innovations in the military domain. Fifth, to reduce the time required for decision-making in unit control on the battlefield, an inter-service information exchange system based on mobile devices has been created and has proven effective. Over 6,500 such systems have already been delivered to the troops. As a result of their use, the time taken for decision-making has decreased by 1.5 to 2 times. It is now imperative to establish a unified information network that integrates reconnaissance and engagement capabilities at the strategic, operational and tactical levels of control, through the introduction of advanced developments in the military-industrial complex. Sixth, it is necessary to increase the production of robotic systems and unmanned systems of various classes and types. At the beginning of the special military operation, we faced challenges in this area, as some products turned out to be expensive and difficult to operate. Today, several thousand drones of various types are being delivered to the troops each day. We must continue to enhance their combat and operational characteristics. It is equally important to train the operators of such systems under programmes developed based on the experience of real combat operations. Seventh, we need to continue to further expand military and military-technical cooperation with allies and partners who are ready and willing to work with us, which includes most countries around the world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The global military and political landscape remains unstable, particularly in the Middle East, with ongoing conflicts fueled by the West's attempts to maintain dominance. NATO's military presence near Russia's borders has increased, prompting a response to ensure safety and security. Russia is modernizing its armed forces, enhancing capabilities, and developing new military technologies, including advanced robotics and hypersonic systems. Efforts are underway to integrate combat experience into training and improve communication between military units and the defense industry. Additionally, there is a focus on expanding military cooperation with allied nations to strengthen collective defense efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Colleagues. The military and political situation in the world remains to be challenging and unstable. The bloodshed in the Middle East is unceasing. And there is high conflict potential in a number of other regions as well. We see that the current US administration and the entire collective West continue their attempts to retain their global dominance and to impose their so called rules on everyone else even as they shift and reformulate those rules as it suits them. And there's only one stable rules. Those who set the rules are bound by no rules at all. Those who consider themselves to be at the top of the world and to be the representatives of God in the world even though they do not believe themselves. They wage hybrid warfare and pursue containment policies including against Russia. They have set the goal of inflicting strategic defeat on Russia and continuing to provide the illegitimate regime in Kiev with weapons and money, sending their mercenaries and military advisers, thus promoting continued conflict. At the same time, they, try to keep their population in fear of a a Russian attack. Their tactics are very simple. They push us to the red line. They push us to the boundary, forcing us to respond, and then they start presenting us as a threat just as they did during the Soviet times. NATO countries are are wreck racking up their military expenses. They're deploying their strike troops near our borders. And now there are over 100,000 and troops in Europe. And this is far more than the warranted amount. They're also growing their presence in the Asia Pacific. United States is creating new military and political alliances that undermine the established security architecture that have been created over decades. They are also are working to deploy a long range systems which have a range of 5,500 kilometers. They are working on the deployment and our redeployment of missile systems in Europe and Asia Pacific. And we used to have a treaty which regulated this activities But it has now no longer enforced. Due to the actions of the United States, we have underscored many times that we will not deploy intermediate range missiles until the United States deploy similar weapons in a region of the world. That was essentially a unilateral obligation undertaken by Russia. But if the United States start deploying such weapons, then any and all such voluntary restrictions will be lifted. And considering the situation, we have to take additional measures to ensure our safety and the safety of our allies. And we are doing this in a careful and weighted manner, taking care of the socioeconomic development of our country. We are modernizing our armed forces and increasing their capabilities. And for this purpose, we have created the our learning and the Moscow military districts. And we've increased in a number of our armed forces personnel to 1,500,000. At the share of state of the art and military equipment in nuclear forces is now 95%. And the basic principles governing the use of such weapons have been updated. As outlined in the updated state nuclear deterrence policy. And once again, so that no one accuses us of nuclear saber rattling. It is a deterrence policy. Along with the nuclear triad, the conventional arms are being developed rapidly. Advanced robotic complexes are supplied to our troops including those using AI technologies. Those include intelligence and strike drones, naval drones and the various multipurpose vehicles. We need to ensure continued progressive development of our army and navy and to achieve our goals in the special military operation effectively and efficiency efficiently. Mounting, rising to the challenges that are currently country is currently facing. Our priorities include maintaining stability, strategic security, protecting territorial integrity and sovereignty of our country through the development of our strategic nuclear forces. And we will continue this work creating new systems. At the same time, we must ensure the high combat readiness of our non strategic forces and to carry out regular exercises. We have already mentioned the risks posed by the deployment of missiles by the United States in the Europe and Asia Pacific. We will provide a comprehensive response to these threats. We must focus especially on the detection of possible launches. And we also must ensure the mass production of similar weapons domestically, including hypersonic systems. The Oresnik Intermediate Range, strike complex has been a well noted innovation. We have used it as response to the west western, long range weapons being deployed in Ukraine. It was used in a non nuclear, form, and we must ensure as mass production of these complexes to protect ourselves and our allies. Next, we must integrate the experience gained during the special military operation into training programs and curricular both in military training centers and universities. At the same time, we must update and clarify our regulations and our governing documents. And one of the things I want to emphasize is that members of the personnel, soldiers and officers and sergeants, everyone who has shown themselves to be highly performant must have the opportunities to build a successful military career. And the problem is this the experience that we've got must be considered in determining the course of industrial developments as well. The precision systems that are currently used utilize new methods of targeting at the final, stage of the trajectory, and this has increased its effectiveness. And the protection of onboard equipment of the missiles has been improved. And the computing capabilities allowing advanced targeting have also been expanded. And taking this further is an important task for the defense industry complex. Another important thing is establishing communication between active military units and a defense industrial enterprises. We have achieved a very short times, required to fix, shortcomings that are identified in combat conditions, but we must improve this further. And, of course, we must continue to do everything we can to accelerate the introduction of new technologies and innovations in the military sphere. Next. In order to reduce decision making times, We have introduced a system for communication between the various branches of the military based on mobile devices, and it has allowed to reduce decision making times by a factor of 1.22. And we need to make sure that there is a unified information system used by intelligent intelligence and strike units at both the operative and tactical levels. Speaker 1: We need to enhance the production and We need to Speaker 0: enhance the production and manufacturing of robotic complexes of various Speaker 1: types and classes. In the early period of the special operation, we face certain difficulties in this regard because of the machines that we had were difficult to operate and they were expensive. And now thousands of unmanned vehicles are being sent to the units. We need to enhance their characteristics further and we need to train operators of such systems. We need to use programs developed based on the experience of the real hostilities. 7, we need to continue to expand military and military technical cooperation with the allied countries and partners with those who are willing to work with us. And I'm speaking about the majority of the countries in the world now.
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 9:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 1990s, Russia faced severe economic turmoil, marked by hyperinflation and a devastated military. The West's "shock doctrine" reforms deepened the crisis, leading to mass unemployment and a significant GDP drop. However, since Putin's rise to power in 1999, the economy has transformed, growing tenfold and reducing inflation dramatically. Despite sanctions, Russia has become Europe's largest economy and a leading wheat exporter. Putin also revitalized national security and traditional values, rebuilding the military and promoting cultural heritage.

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺💪How Putin Made Russia GREAT AGAIN Russia in the 1990s: a nation crippled by 2,500% inflation, a ruined economy, and a gutted military. Fast forward to today: a $2 trillion economy and global military leader. How did Putin make it happen? You will be AMAZED🧵

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺🕊️Demonstrating unprecedented goodwill, the Soviet Union agreed to end the #ColdWar, envisioning a peaceful future with the West. But this proved naive. 🇺🇸The US had other plans: crush Russia’s economy with “shock doctrine,” dismantle its military, and dismember the nation. 2/13

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

📉🇷🇺In 1992, under the “reforms” driven by globalists, Russia’s #inflation skyrocketed to 2500%. Prices soared, savings were wiped out, and pensioners were left destitute. These reforms brought devastation, not recovery. 3/13 https://t.co/cZ5MP2Gf2I

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺📉The Western-imposed privatisation turned Russia into a fire sale. Oil, gas, mines, factories, airlines – sold for fractions of their worth. The economy plunged into a Great Depression for eight years. 4/13 https://t.co/sI9QbGGXMp

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺📉From 1991-1999, Russia faced hyperinflation, a 40% GDP drop, mass #unemployment, and rising suicides. The reforms turned out to be a satanic shock therapy. 5/13 https://t.co/C7AfLAZKds

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺📈On Dec 31, 1999, #VladimirPutin became acting President. Under his leadership, Russian GDP grew tenfold: $200B in 1999 to $2T by 2013. 6/13 https://t.co/YVqmaQ7MAW

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺📊Even after the Western #sanctions since 2022, Russia’s economy has kept growing and has surpassed 🇩🇪Germany as Europe’s largest economy (in PPP GDP). 7/13 https://t.co/1pDy1lv3uc

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺💰Putin brought down #inflation, which was wildly out of control in the 1990s — from 2000% in the early 1990s to 120% in 1998 to 2.4% in 2019. 8/13 https://t.co/X20BbBCuVL

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺📈Putin reduced Russia’s #debt from 100% to 15% of GDP. There are now 160 countries in the world that have higher debt-GDP ratios than Russia. This fiscal turnaround is unparalleled. 9/13 https://t.co/Adzqlzqomg

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺🛢️🌾Russia’s #oil production doubled (1999-2015). Grain production set records. As of 2023, Russia is the world's leading #wheat exporter, accounting for approximately 16% of global wheat exports, valued at $9.5 bln. 10/13 https://t.co/9WHseWOCx1

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺🛡️On national security, Putin defeated the CIA-armed radicals in Chechnya and stabilised Russia. Then he quickly rebuilt the Russian #military, which soon produced world-class weapons and even surpassed the US in hypersonic missile technology. 11/13 https://t.co/YVyvKUW35D

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺🚀Russia successfully test-fired cutting-edge #Oreshnik missile on November 21, striking a Ukrainian military facility in Dnepropetrovsk. None of the currently-available Western missile defense systems are capable of intercepting Russia’s Oreshnik, according to experts. 12/13 https://t.co/ISBe5FvW86

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺☦️While the West has become anti-religion, anti-spirituality and anti-traditionalism, Putin championed #tradition. Over 10,000 churches built in the last decade, along with laws to protect children and cultural values. 13/13 https://t.co/QXRp82fPf8

Saved - January 13, 2025 at 8:13 PM

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Putin's Prophecy Comes True‼️ Greatest National Leader of Our Time Putin's 2007 Munich Speech: Stark Prophecy or Reasonable Warning That Fell on Deaf Ears? PHENOMINAL speech. EVERYONE needs to hear it! https://t.co/Ww7JXje10G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спасибо за приглашение на конференцию, где обсуждаются важные вопросы международной безопасности. Безопасность включает не только военно-политическую стабильность, но и экономическую устойчивость, борьбу с бедностью и межцивилизационный диалог. Однополярный мир невозможен и губителен, так как он не учитывает интересы всех стран. Мы наблюдаем рост конфликтов и пренебрежение международным правом, что ведет к гонке вооружений. Необходимо искать баланс интересов и укреплять многостороннюю дипломатию. Россия готова к диалогу по разоружению и поддерживает международные усилия по нераспространению ядерного оружия. Важно создать справедливую экономическую систему, чтобы избежать радикализации и конфликтов. Россия будет продолжать проводить независимую внешнюю политику, стремясь к сотрудничеству с ответственными партнерами. --- Thank you for the invitation to the conference, where important issues of international security are discussed. Security encompasses not only military-political stability but also economic resilience, poverty alleviation, and inter-civilizational dialogue. A unipolar world is impossible and detrimental, as it does not consider the interests of all countries. We are witnessing an increase in conflicts and disregard for international law, leading to an arms race. It is essential to seek a balance of interests and strengthen multilateral diplomacy. Russia is ready for disarmament dialogue and supports international non-proliferation efforts. It is crucial to create a fair economic system to avoid radicalization and conflicts. Russia will continue to pursue an independent foreign policy, aiming for cooperation with responsible partners.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Спасибо большое, уважаемая госпожа федеральный канцлер, господин Тельчик. Дамы и господа, Весьма признателен за приглашение на столь представительную конференцию, собравшую политиков, военных, предпринимателей, экспертов из более чем 40 стран мира. Формат конференции дает мне возможность избежать излишнего политеса и необходимости говорить округлыми, приятными, но пустыми дипломатическими штампами. Формат конференции позволяет сказать то, что я действительно думаю о проблемах международной безопасности. И если мои рассуждения покажутся нашим коллегам излишне полемически заостренными, либо неточными, я прошу на меня не сердиться, это ведь только конференция. Я надеюсь, что после двух-трех минут моего выступления господин Пельчак не включит там красный свет. Итак, известно, что проблематика международной безопасности много шире вопросов военно-политической стабильности. Это устойчивость мировой экономики, преодоление бедности, экономическая безопасность и развитие межцивилизационного диалога. Такой всеобъемлющий неделимый характер безопасности выражен и в её базовом принципе. Безопасность каждого это безопасность всех. Как сказал ещё в первые дни разгоравшейся Второй мировой войны Франклин Рузвельт, где бы ни был нарушен мир, мир повсюду оказывается в безопасности и под угрозой. Эти слова продолжают сохранять актуальность и сегодня. Об этом, кстати, свидетельствует и тема нашей конференции, которая здесь написана Глобальные кризисы, глобальная ответственность. Всего лишь два десятилетия назад мир был идеологически и экономически расколот, а его безопасность обеспечивали огромные стратегические потенциалы двух сверхдержав. Глобальное противостояние отодвигало на периферию международных отношений и повестки дня крайне острые экономические и социальные вопросы. И как всякая война война холодная оставила нам и неразорвавшиеся снаряды, образно выражаясь. Имею в виду идеологические стереотипы, двойные стандарты, иные шаблоны блокового мышления. Предлагавшийся же после холодной войны однополярный мир тоже не состоялся. История человечества, конечно, знает и периоды однополярного состояния, и стремления к мировому господству. Чего только не было в истории человечества. Однако, что же такое однополярный мир? Как бы не украшали этот термин, он в конечном итоге означает на практике только одно Это один центр власти, один центр силы, один центр принятия решения. Это мир одного хозяина, одного суверена, и это в конечном итоге губительно не только для всех, кто находится в рамках этой системы, но и для самого суверена, потому что разрушает его изнутри. И это ничего общего не имеет, конечно, с демократией, потому что демократия это, как известно, власть большинства при учете интересов и мнения меньшинства. Кстати говоря, Россию нас постоянно учат демократии, Но те, кто нас учат, сами почему-то учиться не очень хотят. Считаю, что для современного мира однополярная модель не только неприемлема, но и вообще невозможна. И не только потому, что при единоличном лидерстве в современном, именно в современном мире не будет хватать ни военно-политических, ни экономических ресурсов. Но, что еще важнее, сама модель является неработающей, так как в ее основе нет и не может быть морально-нравственной базы современной цивилизации. Вместе с тем, все, что происходит сегодня в мире, и сейчас мы только вот начали дискутировать об этом, это следствие попыток внедрения именно этой концепции в мировые дела, концепции однополярного мира. А какой результат? Односторонние, нелегитимные часто действия не решили ни одной проблемы. Более того, они стали генератором новых человеческих трагедий и очагов напряженности. Судите сами, Войн локальных и региональных конфликтов меньше не стало. Господин Тельчик вот об этом очень мягко упомянул. И людей в этих конфликтах гибнет не меньше, а даже больше, чем раньше. Значительно больше, значительно больше. Сегодня мы наблюдаем почти ничем не сдерживаемое, гипертрофированное применение силы в международных делах, военной силы. Силы, ввергающие мир в пучину следующих один за другим конфликтов. В результате не хватает сил на комплексное решение ни одного из них. Становится невозможным и их политическое решение. Мы видим все большее пренебрежение основополагающими принципами международного права. Больше того, отдельные нормы, да по сути чуть ли не вся система права одного государства, прежде всего конечно в Соединенных Штатах, перешагнула свои национальные границы и по сути во всех сферах и в экономике, и в политике, и в гуманитарной сфере навязывается другим государствам. Ну кому это понравится? В международных делах все чаще встречаются стремления решить тот или иной вопрос исходя из так называемой политической целесообразности, основанной на текущей политической конъюнктуре. И это, конечно, крайне опасно и ведет к тому, что никто уже не чувствует себя в безопасности. Я хочу это подчеркнуть: никто не чувствует себя в безопасности, потому что никто не может спрятаться за международным правом, как за каменной стеной. Такая политика является, конечно, катализатором гонки вооружений. Доминирование фактора силы неизбежно подпитывает тягу ряда стран к обладанию оружием массового уничтожения. Более того, появились принципиально новые угрозы, которые и раньше были известны, но сегодня приобретают глобальный характер, такие как терроризм. Убежден, мы подошли к тому рубежному моменту, когда должны серьезно задуматься над всей архитектурой глобальной безопасности. И здесь надо отталкиваться от поиска разумного баланса между интересами всех субъектов международного общения. Тем более сейчас, когда международный ландшафт столь ощутимо и столь быстро меняется. Меняется за счет динамичного развития целого ряда государств и регионов. Госпожа федеральный канцлер упомянул уже об этом. Так, суммарный ВВП Индии и Китая по паритетной покупательной способности уже больше, чем у Соединенных Штатов Америки. А рассчитанный по тому же принципу ВВП государств группы БРИК превосходит совокупный ВВП Евросоюза. И по оценкам экспертов, в обозримой исторической перспективе этот разрыв будет только возрастать. Не стоит сомневаться, что экономический потенциал новых центров мирового роста будет неизбежно конвертироваться в политическое влияние и укреплять будет многополярность. В этой связи серьезно возрастает роль многосторонней дипломатии. Открытость, транспарентность и предсказуемость политики безальтернативны, а применение силы должно быть действительно исключительной мерой, так же, как и применение смертной казни в правовых системах некоторых государств. Сегодня же мы, наоборот, наблюдаем ситуацию, когда страны, в которых применение смертной казни запрещено даже в отношении убийц и других преступников, опасных преступников. Несмотря на это, такие страны легко идут на участие в военных операциях, которые трудно назвать легитимными. А ведь в этих конфликтах гибнут люди, сотни, тысячи мирных людей. Но в то же время возникает вопрос, разве мы должны безучастно и безвольно взирать на различные внутренние конфликты в отдельных странах, на действия авторитарных режимов, тиранов, на распространение оружия массового уничтожения. Именно это и лежало в основе вопроса, который был задан федеральному канцлеру нашим уважаемым коллегой господином Либерманом. Я правильно понял ваш вопрос? И конечно это вопрос серьезный. Можем ли мы безучастно смотреть на то, что происходит? Я попробую ответить на ваш вопрос тоже. Конечно, мы не должны смотреть безучастно, конечно нет. Но есть ли у нас средства, чтобы противостоять этим угрозам? Конечно, есть. Достаточно вспомнить недавнюю историю. Ведь произошел же мирный переход к демократии в нашей стране. Ведь состоялась же мирная трансформация советского режима. Мирная трансформация. И какого режима? С каким количеством оружия, в том числе ядерного оружия? Почему же сейчас при каждом удобном случае нужно бомбить и стрелять? Неужели в условиях отсутствия угрозы взаимного уничтожения нам не хватает политической культуры, уважения к ценностям демократии и к праву? Убеждён, единственным механизмом принятия решения по использованию военной силы, как последнего довода, может быть только уставован. И в этой связи я или не понял то, что было сказано вот совсем недавно нашим коллегой министром обороны Италии, либо он выразился неточно. Я, во всяком случае, услышал, что легитимным применение силы может считаться только в том случае, если решение принято в НАТО или в Евросоюзе, или в ООН. Если он действительно так считает, то у нас с ним разные точки зрения или я ослышался. Легитимным можно считать применение силы только если решение принято на основе и в рамках ООН. И не надо применять Организацию Объединенных Наций ни НАТО, ни Евросоюзу. И когда ООН будет реально объединять силы международного сообщества, которое может действительно действительно может реагировать на события в отдельных странах. Когда мы избавимся от пренебрежения международным правом, то ситуация может измениться. В противном случае ситуация будет заходить лишь в тупик и умножать количество тяжелых ошибок. При этом, конечно, нужно добиваться того, чтобы международное право имело универсальный характер и в понимании, и в применении норм. И нельзя забывать, что демократический образ действий в политике обязательно предполагает дискуссию и кропотливую выработку решений. Уважаемые дамы и господа, потенциальная опасность дестабилизации международных отношений связана и с очевидным застоем в области разоружения. Россия выступает за возобновление диалога по этому важнейшему вопросу. Важно сохранить устойчивость международно-правовой разоруженческой базы. При этом обеспечить преемственность процесса сокращения ядерных вооружений. Мы договорились с Соединенными Штатами Америки о сокращении наших ядерных потенциалов на стратегических носителях до 1700-2200 ядерных боезарядов к 31 декабря 2012 года. Россия намерена строго выполнять взятые на себя обязательства. Надеемся, что и наши партнеры будут действовать так же транспарентно и не будут откладывать на всякий случай, на черный день, лишнюю пару сотен ядерных боезарядов. И если сегодня новый министр обороны Соединенных Штатов здесь нам объявят, что Соединенные Штаты не будут прятать эти заряды лишние ни на складах, ни под подушкой, ни под одеялом, я предлагаю всем встать и стоя это поприветствовать. Это было бы очень важное заявление. Россия строго придерживается и намерена в дальнейшем придерживаться договора о нераспространении ядерного оружия и многостороннего режима контроля за ракетными технологиями. Принципы, заложенные в этих документах, носят универсальный характер. В этой связи хотел бы вспомнить, что в 80-е годы СССР и Соединенные Штаты подписали договор о ликвидации целого класса ракет средней и малой дальности. Но универсального характера этому документу придано не было. Сегодня такие ракеты уже имеют целый ряд стран: Корейская Народно-Демократическая Республика, Республика Корея, Индия, Иран, Пакистан, Израиль. Многие другие государства мира разрабатывают эти системы и планируют поставить их на вооружение. И только Соединенные Штаты Америки и Россия несут обязательство не создавать подобных систем вооружений. Ясно, что в этих условиях мы вынуждены задуматься об обеспечении своей собственной безопасности. Вместе с тем нельзя допустить появления новых достабилизирующих, высокотехнологичных видов оружия. Я уже не говорю о мерах по предупреждению новых сфер конфронтации, особенно в космосе. Звездные войны, как известно, уже не фантастика, а реальность. Еще в середине 80-х годов наши американские партнеры на практике провели перехват собственного спутника. Милитаризация космоса, по мнению России, может спровоцировать непредсказуемые для мирового сообщества последствия, не меньшие, чем начало ядерной эры. И мы не раз выступали с инициативами, направленными на недопущение оружия в космос. Сегодня хотел бы проинформировать вас о том, что нами подготовлен проект договора о предотвращении размещения оружия в космическом пространстве. В ближайшее время он будет направлен партнерам в качестве официального предложения. Давайте работать над этим вместе. Нас также не могут не тревожить планы по развертыванию элементов системы противоракетной обороны в Европе. Кому нужен очередной виток неизбежной в этом случае гонки вооружений? Глубоко сомневаюсь, что самим европейцам. Ракетного оружия, реально угрожающего Европе, с дальностью действия порядка 5-8 тысяч километров нет ни у одной так называемой из проблемных стран. И в будущем в обозримой перспективе и не появится, не предвидится даже. Да и гипотетический пуск, например, северокорейской ракеты по территории США через Западную Европу это явно противоречит законам баллистики. Как говорят у нас в России это все равно, что правой рукой дотягиваться до левого уха. И находясь здесь, в Германии, не могу не упомянуть и о кризисном состоянии договора об обычных вооруженных силах в Европе. Адаптированный договор об обычных вооруженных силах в Европе был подписан в 1999 году. Он учитывал новую геополитическую реальность ликвидацию Варшавского блока. С тех пор прошло 7 лет, и только четыре государства ратифицировали этот документ, включая Российскую Федерацию. Страны НАТО открыто заявили, что не ратифицируют договор, включая положения о фланговых ограничениях, о размещении на флангах определенного количества вооруженных сил до тех пор, пока Россия не выведет свои базы из Грузии и Молдавии. Из Грузии наши войска выводятся, причем даже в ускоренном порядке. Эти проблемы мы с нашими грузинскими коллегами решили, и это всем известно. В Молдавии остается группировка в 1500 военнослужащих, которые выполняют миротворческие функции и охраняют склады с боеприпасами, оставшиеся со времен СССР. И мы с господином Соланой обсуждаем постоянно этот вопрос, он знает нашу позицию, мы готовы и дальше работать по этому направлению. Но что же происходит в это же самое время? А в это самое время в Болгарии и Румынии появляются так называемые легкие американские передовые базы по 5000 штыков в каждой. Получается, что НАТО выдвигает свои передовые силы к нашим государственным границам, А мы, строго выполняя договор, никак не реагируем на эти действия. Думаю, очевидно, процесс НАТОвского расширения не имеет никакого отношения к модернизации самого Альянса или к обеспечению безопасности в Европе. Наоборот, это серьезно провоцирующий фактор, снижающий уровень взаимного доверия. И у нас есть справедливое право откровенно спросить против кого это расширение. И что стало с теми заверениями, которые давались западными партнерами после роспуска Варшавского договора? Где теперь эти заявления? О них даже никто не помнит, Но я позволю себе напомнить в этой аудитории, что было сказано. Хотел бы привести цитату из выступления генерального секретаря НАТО господина Вернера в Брюсселе 17 мая 1990 года. Он тогда сказал: Сам факт, что мы готовы не размещать войска НАТО за пределами территории ФРГ, дает Советскому Союзу твердые гарантии безопасности. Где эта гарантия? Камни и бетонные блоки берлинской стены давно разошлись на сувениры. Но нельзя забывать, что ее падение стало возможным в том числе и благодаря историческому выбору, в том числе нашего народа, народа России. Выбору в пользу демократии и свободы, открытости и искреннего партнерства со всеми членами большой европейской семьи. Сейчас же нам пытаются навязать уже новые разделительные линии и стены, пусть виртуальные, но все-таки разделяющие, разрезающие наш общий континент? Неужели вновь потребуются долгие годы и десятилетия смена нескольких поколений политиков, чтобы разобрать и демонтировать эти новые стены? Уважаемые дамы и господа, мы однозначно выступаем и за укрепление режима нераспространения. Существующая международно-правовая база позволяет создать технологии по выработке ядерного топлива для использования его в мирных целях. И многие страны с полным на то основанием хотят создавать собственную ядерную энергетику, как основу их энергетической независимости. Но мы также понимаем, что эти технологии могут быть быстро трансформированы в получение оружейных материалов. Это вызывает серьезное международное напряжение. Яркий тому пример ситуация с иранской ядерной программой. Если международное сообщество не выработает разумного решения этого конфликта интересов, мир и дальше будет потрясать подобные дестабилизирующие кризисы. Потому что пороговых стран больше, чем Иран. И мы с вами об этом знаем. Мы будем постоянно сталкиваться с угрозой распространения оружия массового уничтожения. В прошлом году Россия выступила с инициативой создания многонациональных центров по обогащению урана. Мы открыты к тому, чтобы подобные центры создавались не только в России, но и в других странах, где на легитимной основе существует мирная ядерная энергетика. Государства, желающие развивать атомную энергетику, могли бы гарантированно получать топливо через непосредственное участие в работе этих центров, конечно же, под строгим контролем МАГАТЭ. С российским предложением созвучны и последние инициативы президента США Джорджа Буша. Считаю, что Россия и США объективно и в одинаковой степени заинтересованы в ужесточении режимов нераспространения оружия массового уничтожения и средств его доставки. Именно наши страны, являющиеся лидерами по ядерному и ракетному потенциалу, должны стать и лидерами в разработке новых, более жестких мер в сфере нераспространения. Россия готова к такой работе, мы ведем консультации с нашими американскими друзьями. В целом, речь должна идти о создании целой системы политических рычагов и экономических стимулов. Стимулов, при которых государства были бы заинтересованы не создавать собственные мощности ядерного топливного цикла, но имели бы возможность развивать атомную энергетику, укрепляя свой энергетический потенциал. В этой связи подробнее остановлюсь на международном энергетическом сотрудничестве. Госпожа федеральный канцлер тоже об этом коротко, но упомянула, затронула эту тему. В энергетической сфере Россия ориентируется на создание единых для всех рыночных принципов и прозрачных условий. Очевидно, что цена на энергоносители должна определяться рынком, а не являться предметом политических спекуляций, экономического давления или шантажа. Мы открыты для сотрудничества. Зарубежные компании участвуют в наших крупнейших энергетических проектах. По различным оценкам до 26% добычи нефти в России, вдумайтесь в эту цифру, пожалуйста, до 26% добычи нефти в России приходится на иностранный капитал. Попробуйте, попробуйте привести мне пример подобного широкого присутствия российского бизнеса в ключевых отраслях экономики западных государств. Нет таких примеров. Таких примеров нет. Напомню также о соотношении инвестиций, поступающих в Россию и идущих из России в другие страны мира. Соотношение примерно 15 к 1. Вот вам зримый пример открытости и стабильности российской экономики. Экономическая безопасность это сфера, где всем следует придерживаться единых принципов. Мы готовы честно конкурировать. Для этого у российской экономики появляется всё больше возможностей. Такую динамику объективно оценивают эксперты и наши зарубежные партнеры. Так, недавно был повышен рейтинг России в ОАЭСР. Из четвертой группы риска наша страна перешла в третью. И хотел бы, пользуясь случаем, здесь сегодня в Мюнхене поблагодарить наших немецких коллег за содействие в принятии вышеназванного решения. Далее, как вы знаете, процесс присоединения России к ВТО вышел на финальную стадию. Отмечу, что в ходе долгих, непростых переговоров слова о свободе, мы не расслышали слова о свободе слова, о свободе торговли, о равных возможностях, но почему-то исключительно применительно к нашему, к российскому рынку. И еще одна важная тема, прямо влияющая на глобальную безопасность. Сегодня много говорят о борьбе с бедностью. Что здесь происходит на самом деле? С одной стороны, на программы помощи беднейшим странам выделяются финансовые ресурсы и подчас немаленькие финансовые ресурсы. Но по-честному, и здесь многие тоже это знают, зачастую под освоение компаниями самих же стран доноров. Но в то же время, с другой стороны, в развитых странах сохраняются субсидии в сельском хозяйстве, ограничивается для других доступ к высоким технологиям. И давайте называть вещи своими именами. Получается, что одной рукой раздается благотворительная помощь, а другой не только консервируется экономическая отсталость, а еще и собирается прибыль. Возникающее социальное напряжение в таких депрессивных регионах неизбежно выливаются в рост радикализма, экстремизма, подпитывая терроризм и локальные конфликты. А если все это вдобавок происходит, скажем, на Ближнем Востоке, в условиях обостренного восприятия внешнего мира как несправедливого, то возникает риск для глобальной дестабилизации. Очевидно, что ведущие страны мира должны видеть эту угрозу и, соответственно, выстраивать более демократическую, справедливую систему экономических отношений в мире. Систему, дающую всем шанс и возможность для развития. Выступая на конференции по безопасности, уважаемые дамы и господа, нельзя обойти молчанием и деятельность организации по безопасности и сотрудничеству в Европе. Как известно, она была создана, чтобы рассматривать все, я подчеркну это, все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами учредителей. Скроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций, формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСВ призваны оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем, но вовсе это не означает вмешательства во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и, наоборот, делает их зависимыми и, как следствие, нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия и транспарентности. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку. Вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. И, конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех. Благодарю вас за внимание.
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 9:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 1990s, after the Soviet Union's collapse, Russia was misled into embracing capitalism, which led to catastrophic outcomes. Influenced by globalists like George Soros, the country underwent "shock therapy" reforms that resulted in staggering inflation, skyrocketing prices, and widespread poverty. The West's privatization efforts sold off Russia's assets at a fraction of their value, leading to factory closures and a significant drop in production. By the late 1990s, the nation faced a crisis with high unemployment and a declining population, setting the stage for Putin's later resurgence.

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

How Soros & Co Tried to INFILTRATE 🇷🇺 Russia Russia was sold a false dream of capitalism and prosperity in the 1990s. Instead, it became the world’s biggest heist as 🇺🇸 George Soros & Co looted the country. What happened during that time will BLOW EVERYONE'S MIND 🧵👇

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🕊️🤥In the 1990s, the Soviet Union, in an unprecedented act of goodwill, agreed to end the #ColdWar and collaborate with the West to build a new, peaceful future. But this naivety would prove disastrous. 2/13 https://t.co/zchTknWu95

Video Transcript AI Summary
For the first time, arms control language has shifted to arms reduction. General Secretary, although my pronunciation might be challenging, I appreciate your phrase: "trust but verify." You use it at every meeting, and I like it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the first time in history, the language of arms control was replaced by arms reduction. Mister general secretary, though my pronunciation may give you difficulty, trust but verify. You repeat that at every meeting. I like it.

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇺🇸🇷🇺After the Soviet collapse, globalists like #GeorgeSoros dreamt of further fragmenting Russia and erasing it from history. The US had plans: crush Russia’s economy with “shock doctrine”, destroy its military, and break the nation apart. 3/13 https://t.co/GGFG7LF5Ff

Video Transcript AI Summary
My initial efforts began in South Africa, followed by Eastern Europe after the Soviet Union collapsed. I focused on Hungary in 1984, Poland in 1987, and China in the same year, effectively building what I call the Soros Empire to replace the Soviet Empire. Currently, I'm most involved in Russia, which mirrors the situation during the Soviet Union's collapse. However, the context has changed; back then, the Soviet Union was declining while the European Union was thriving. Now, we see a resurgent Russia and a disintegrating European Union, which is a concerning development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My first major effort well, my first one was in South Africa. But afterwards, Eastern Europe, when the Soviet Union the Soviet Empire collapsed. And as the Empire collapsed, I moved in and picked up the pieces. 1st in Hungary in 1984, and then Poland in 'eighty seven, China in 'eighty seven as well. And so this is how the what I'm the Soros Empire, replacing the Soviet Empire. How do you think you're doing in your imperial ambitions? Well, as you can see, you take take, Russia, which is actually where I'm most involved currently. And it's a replay. But what we went through in at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union. But unfortunately, the big difference is that then you had a moribund Soviet Union and you had an emerging European Union, which was the height of the European Union the integration. And now you have the reverse. You have a resurgent Russia and unfortunately, disintegrating European Union. And that's a very sad development.

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇺🇸Soros’ network organised trips for 🇷🇺Russian politicians to 🇵🇱Poland to study the "shock therapy" model, a reform process created by Soros’s protégé, Harvard economist #JeffreySachs. 4/13 https://t.co/MBuCsBcW1n

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🤩Inspired by 🇵🇱Poland's example, 🇷🇺Russian politicians pushed for "rapid liberalisation", leading to price increases, and the opening of the Russian market to globalists. 5/13 https://t.co/2ijm62Ph37

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

📉🇷🇺In 1992, Russia’s first year of “reforms”, #inflation hit 2500%. Food prices surged 25 times, and pensioners saw their savings wiped out. 6/13 https://t.co/ZJdH61IzNj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The government and economic systems have collapsed, leaving many without hope. Millions of Russian citizens navigate the aftermath of communism, with the elderly and young families suffering the most. Volodya and Maria, a young couple, live with her mother and grandfather in a cramped three-room apartment. They combine their incomes but still struggle to afford basic necessities like vitamins, medicines, and nutritious food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government has fallen apart. The economic system has fallen apart. There would be no hope without CBN here to to show the true hope. Speaker 1: Millions of Russian citizens stumble daily through the economic rubble left by communism. The elderly and young families, however, are the hardest hit by the changes. People like Volodya and his wife, Maria. Maria is a student, and Volodya works in a print shop. So the couple is forced to live with her mother and grandfather in a small 3 room apartment. They pool their incomes. Still, they can't afford things that you and I might take for granted. Items like vitamins, medicines, and nutritious Speaker 0: food.

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🏷️🇷🇺The West, in the name of privatisation, put Russia up for a fire sale. #Oil fields, gold mines, factories, media – everything was sold off at a fraction of its worth. 7/13 https://t.co/zNrdTTaYQn

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇺🇸🤑The Harvard Management Company and #GeorgeSoros became major shareholders in 🇷🇺Novolipetsk, Russia's second-largest steel mill, and 🛢️Sidanko Oil, which boasted reserves larger than those of Mobil. 8/13 https://t.co/vEBA92hmzK

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺🏭📉Under Western-backed reforms, thousands of Russian factories were shuttered. Russia’s production of wheat, oil, and gas halved compared to the #Soviet era. 9/13 https://t.co/IPhNA5LKFB

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🤔💭To "solve" the economic crisis, the West prescribed even more austerity: slash government spending, lay off workers, and raise #taxes. The result? More misery for 🇷🇺Russians. 10/13 https://t.co/EJVJaDBmcm

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

😨By the mid-1990s, 🇷🇺Russian workers went months without pay. 2 mln children became orphans, #suicide rates soared, and male life expectancy dropped to 58. Between 1991-1999, Russia’s population shrank by 8 mln. 11/13 https://t.co/tlfOUvxUm6

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺⚔️🇺🇸 The Russian military was in shambles and was badly losing wars to terrorists, armed by the US, in #Chechnya. 12/13 https://t.co/VtWN1ri8e2

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺📉Russia faced its own Great Depression: hyperinflation, a 40% GDP drop, mass #unemployment, widespread poverty, and skyrocketing suicides. The 🇺🇸Soros-backed "reforms" was nothing short of a disaster. 13/13 https://t.co/ynhevbYBoV

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺💪 How Putin Made Russia GREAT AGAIN 👇 https://t.co/Alx8LgU4zq

@Sputnik_India - Sputnik India

🇷🇺💪How Putin Made Russia GREAT AGAIN Russia in the 1990s: a nation crippled by 2,500% inflation, a ruined economy, and a gutted military. Fast forward to today: a $2 trillion economy and global military leader. How did Putin make it happen? You will be AMAZED🧵

Saved - January 24, 2025 at 3:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
After the USSR's collapse, Russia faced severe challenges, including economic turmoil and loss of sovereignty. Under Yeltsin, the country struggled, but Putin's rise marked a turning point. He demonstrated loyalty to his mentor, Sobchak, by risking his career to help him escape political persecution. As president, Putin ended the oligarchs' dominance, demanding tax compliance and nationalizing key industries. His presidency saw significant economic growth, increased social support, and improvements in education and healthcare, transforming Russia's global standing and internal stability.

@rinalu_ - Rina Lu🇷🇺

How Putin made Russia Great Again or why Russians love him so much (very long 🧵) After the collapse of the USSR, Russia became a colony of the West and lost its sovereignty. During the 1990s and under Yeltsin’s government, the country nearly fell apart. The military and industries across all sectors were destroyed, school textbooks were rewritten, and resources were sold off to Western corporations. It’s a serious question whether Russia would even exist today if things had continued that way. However, with Putin’s arrival, everything changed - he brought Russia back to itself. Bio Few in the West know about Putin’s mentor, Anatoly Sobchak, who introduced him to politics. Sobchak was a strong supporter of liberal-democratic ideas and one of the founders of the “Democratic Russia” party. In the early 1990s, Vladimir Putin worked as an assistant to the rector of Leningrad State University for international affairs. This position served as a cover, as he was an active KGB agent. When Sobchak noticed him at the University and invited him to join his team, Putin had to admit his work in intelligence. Realizing that combining KGB work with political activity was impossible, he resigned from the KGB. In June 1991, Sobchak became the mayor of St. Petersburg. During the tense political environment of the time, from 1993 onward, Sobchak often entrusted Putin to act as mayor during his foreign trips, showing great trust in his professionalism. However, starting in 1995, a campaign to discredit Sobchak began, organized by his political opponents in Moscow who viewed him as a potential rival for the presidency. Using accusations of misconduct, law enforcement agencies like the Prosecutor’s Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the FSB effectively ended his political career. His worsening health worked to his enemies’ advantage, reducing his ability to defend himself. At one point, they even tried to block him from traveling abroad for medical treatment.

@rinalu_ - Rina Lu🇷🇺

If you think the collapse of the Soviet Union was good for the people, think again. Let’s take a closer look at what democracy and capitalism brought to Russia in the 1990s. In the 1990s, the Soviet Union fell apart, and Russia began moving towards a market economy. However, this transition brought with it a severe economic collapse, widespread poverty, and a sharp rise in organized crime.

@rinalu_ - Rina Lu🇷🇺

Putin’s Loyalty Over Political Ambition At this critical moment, Putin showed complete loyalty to his mentor, Sobchak. He knew that helping Sobchak leave the country involved serious risks to his own career. First, he was going against powerful state agencies that were actively pursuing Sobchak. If the plan failed, Putin could have been accused of aiding or hiding him. Second, Sobchak was a political outsider at the time, and supporting him could have been seen as a strategic mistake, alienating influential allies in Moscow. Third, successfully getting Sobchak out of the country under the strict control of the FSB, prosecutors, and the Ministry of Internal Affairs required extreme caution. It could have been seen as breaking the law, threatening not just Putin’s career but also his personal freedom. Despite these risks, Putin, using skills from his intelligence background, arranged for Sobchak to leave for France, where he underwent life-saving surgery. This act was a remarkable display of loyalty and courage. After the operation, Putin reported the outcome to Yeltsin, who, after a pause, approved his actions, saying, “You did the right thing.” This moment highlighted not only Putin’s loyalty to Sobchak but also his willingness to take risks for his principles and a sense of justice, which later became a defining feature of his political career.

@rinalu_ - Rina Lu🇷🇺

The Turning Point: Russia’s New Year of Change Since Christmas is a religious holiday in Russia, New Year’s Eve is celebrated similarly to how Christmas is in the West. A New Year’s tree is set up, and children receive gifts from Ded Moroz, the Russian Santa Claus, on the night of December 31st to January 1st. The celebration begins with a televised speech by the president, followed by the countdown to the chimes of the Kremlin clock, Russia’s main timepiece. Back then, everyone anticipated Boris Yeltsin’s New Year address. By the 2000s, however, Yeltsin could barely speak. He was widely seen as a hopeless alcoholic, mocked by the Russian people and even by foreign leaders like Bill Clinton. Russians felt ashamed of their president, who had become a national embarrassment. But instead of Yeltsin’s familiar face on TV, a young man appeared. Calm, polite, and well-spoken, he explained that Yeltsin had stepped down due to health reasons, and until the elections in the spring, he would take on presidential duties. He wished everyone a Happy New Year, and for the first time in a while, there was a sense of hope in the air. When the elections came, people voted for this young man, Vladimir Putin, and he became president. Almost immediately, he introduced significant changes, particularly regarding the oligarchs who had gained immense political influence in the 1990s during the privatization of state enterprises under Yeltsin. After the collapse of the USSR, several waves of privatization swept through Russia, leaving the nation’s wealth in the hands of a few. While ordinary Russians suffered from a sharp decline in living standards, barely scraping by, the business clans born in the chaos of perestroika solidified their control over the most valuable assets of what was once a great country.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Дорогие россияне! Сегодня, 31 декабря 1999 года, первый Президент России, Борис Ельцин, решил уйти в отставку и попросил меня обратиться к вам. В течение трех месяцев пройдут выборы Президента, и я хочу подчеркнуть, что власти не будет вакуума. Любые попытки нарушить российские законы и Конституцию будут пресекаться. Свобода слова, совести, СМИ и права собственности будут защищены. Вооруженные силы и правоохранительные органы продолжают работать в обычном режиме. Государство обеспечит безопасность каждого гражданина. Президент действовал в полном соответствии с Конституцией при передаче власти. --- Dear Russians! Today, December 31, 1999, the first President of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, decided to resign and asked me to address you. In three months, presidential elections will take place, and I want to emphasize that there will be no vacuum of power. Any attempts to violate Russian laws and the Constitution will be suppressed. Freedom of speech, conscience, media, and property rights will be protected. The armed forces and law enforcement continue to operate normally. The state will ensure the safety of every citizen. The President acted fully in accordance with the Constitution in transferring power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Дорогие друзья! Сегодня, в новогоднюю ночь, я, как и вы, с родными и друзьями собирался выслушать слова приветствия Президента России Бориса Николаевича Ельцина. Но вышло иначе. Сегодня, 31 декабря 1999 года, первый Президент России принял решение уйти в отставку. Он просил меня обратиться к стране. Дорогие россияне, дорогие соотечественники, сегодня на меня возложена обязанность главы государства. Через три месяца состоятся выборы Президента России. Обращаю внимание на то, что ни минуты не будет вакуума власти в стране. Не было и не будет. Я хочу предупредить, что любые попытки выйти за рамки российских законов, за рамки Конституции России будут решительно пресекаться. Свобода слова, свобода совести, свобода средств массовой информации, права собственности эти основополагающие элементы цивилизованного общества будут надежно защищены государством. Вооруженные силы, Федеральная пограничная служба, органы правопорядка осуществляют свою работу в обычном, прежнем режиме. Государство стояло и будет стоять на страже безопасности каждого нашего человека. Принимая свое решение о передаче власти, Президент действовал в полном соответствии с Конституцией страны.

@rinalu_ - Rina Lu🇷🇺

The End of the Oligarch Era: Putin’s Economic Revolution Putin made it clear that the era of oligarchs dictating terms to the state was over. He demanded they pay taxes and end tax evasion practices, including the widespread use of offshore schemes popular in the 1990s. One symbolic example of this crackdown was the case of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his oil company, Yukos, which became a landmark in the fight against tax evasion. Following this, many companies began significantly increasing their tax contributions to the state budget. Putin also expected major businesses to invest in infrastructure, social services, and regional development. For instance, after Putin took office, Roman Abramovich invested heavily in developing the Chukotka region, where he served as governor. Other businessmen were also required to fund the construction of schools, hospitals, roads, and other public facilities. Oligarchs were instructed not only to avoid political involvement but to publicly support Kremlin policies, including major state initiatives and foreign policy. Funding opposition movements was strictly forbidden, and compliance was seen as essential for maintaining their businesses. The state also involved oligarchs in national priorities, such as the 2014 Sochi Olympics and the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Companies owned by oligarchs often became contractors for these large-scale projects, investing significant resources. Putin demanded the return of assets and capital taken abroad in the 1990s. This included repatriating funds from offshore accounts and relocating companies under Russian jurisdiction. Under pressure from the Kremlin, some oligarchs moved their assets to Russian banks or registered them in Russia. Strategic industries like oil, gas, and metallurgy were brought under state control or placed in the hands of Kremlin-loyal structures. Oligarchs managing major resources were required to align their activities with state interests. Not all oligarchs agreed with these new rules. Mikhail Khodorkovsky, head of Yukos, refused to pay taxes on his company’s profits. Under Khodorkovsky, the Rothschilds gained influence over Russian oil. Putin not only jailed him but also nationalized Yukos, redirecting its revenues to the Russian budget instead of foreign hands. After serving his sentence, Khodorkovsky moved to Britain, where he launched campaigns to discredit Putin and funded Russian newspapers critical of the government. Many of these outlets were labeled foreign agents in 2022. Btw, Khodorkovsky was invited and he also attended Trump’s inauguration 2 days ago. Boris Berezovsky, another prominent oligarch, made billions through ventures like “Logovaz” (car sales) and co-ownership of “Sibneft” with Abramovich. His activities caused significant harm to the Russian economy. Understanding the power of media, he owned newspapers and held shares in the ORT television channel. Berezovsky was suspected of involvement in the murders of journalist Paul Klebnikov, who wrote the book “Godfather of the Kremlin”, and TV host Vladislav Listyev. His commercial ties allegedly extended to organized crime groups and Chechen militants, with claims that he profited from the release of hostages held in Chechnya. When Berezovsky refused to accept the new rules in Russia, he fled to London, where he called for a “violent overthrow of power” in Russia. Other oligarchs, including Vladimir Gusinsky, Evgeny Chichvarkin, Sergey Pugachev, Alexander Lebedev, Roman Abramovich, Leonard Blavatnik, Leonid Nevzlin, Mikhail Fridman, Pyotr Aven, and Alexander Smolensky, faced similar outcomes. In the end, Putin returned control of strategic industries—oil, gas, and metallurgy—to the state. Many assets held by oligarchs were nationalized or transferred to companies that prioritized Russia’s interests. These changes redirected investments into the country’s development rather than draining wealth into offshore accounts, strengthening the nation’s economy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Почему здесь не было людей, способных принимать решения? При моем приезде все разбежались. Вы сделали заложниками своих амбиций и непрофессионализма. Это недопустимо для тысяч людей. Если собственники не смогут договориться, комплекс все равно восстановят без вас. Вы подписали договор? Да. Али Боич подписал? Ничего не вижу, подпишите. Идите ко мне. --- Why were there no decision-makers here? When I arrived, everyone scattered. You have made thousands of people hostages to your ambitions and unprofessionalism. This is unacceptable. If the owners can't reach an agreement, the complex will be restored without you. Did you sign the contract? Yes. Did Ali Boich sign? I see nothing; just sign it. Come to me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Почему раньше здесь не было людей, которые способны были принимать решения? Почему здесь-то забегали все как тараканы при самом моем приезде? Считаю, что вы сделали заложниками своих амбиций, непрофессионализма, а может быть просто и тривиальной жадности. Тысячи людей! Это абсолютно недопустимо. Если собственники договориться между собой не смогут, то единый комплекс всё равно будет восстановлен в том или в другом виде, то это будет сделано без вас. Вы подписали тут договор? Да. Али Боич подписал? Ничего не вижу, уже подпишите. Идите ко мне.

@rinalu_ - Rina Lu🇷🇺

Now, let’s look at the achievements of Putin’s presidency in numbers. 🔷 GDP (Gross Domestic Product) increased by 930%. 🔷 The national external debt was reduced by 75.2%. 🔷 In 2024, Russia ranked first in Europe and fourth in the world for GDP (PPP). According to the IMF, Russia’s share of global GDP (PPP) reached 3.55%, surpassing Japan’s 3.38%. 🔷 Between 1999 and 2024, Russia’s gold reserves experienced significant growth by approx 580%, reaching 2332 tonnes. 🔷 International reserves increased over 5,000%, reaching $609 billion. 🔷 Federal budget revenue increased 45 times to 36.72 trillion rubles. 🔷 Major international events were held: the Sochi Olympics (2014) and the FIFA World Cup (2018). 🔷 Increased funding for culture, cinema, and scientific research. Education and Science 🔷 National education projects contributed to the modernization of schools and universities. 🔷 Only from 2019 to 2023, 900 new schools were built. Overall number for the last 25 years is much higher. Additionally, every year more than 1,000 schools undergo major renovations. By the end of the five-year period, more than 7,300 educational institutions, including those in rural and small towns, will have been updated. 🔷 Russia remains a leader in space exploration, continuing missions with Soyuz spacecraft and developing new technologies. Industry and Economy 🔷 Industrial production grew by 60%. 🔷 Manufacturing increased by 70% by 2019; in 2024, it grew an additional 7.2%. 🔷 Agricultural product exports grew 19 times to $25 billion. 🔷 Grain exports grew 40 times, reaching 50 million tons. 🔷 Over the past 17 years, Russia has opened 200 to 500 new factories, workshops, and enterprises annually. Social Progress 🔷 Real wages increased 3.5 times. This reflects real growth for the entire population, accounting for inflation and other factors, not just for select groups. 🔷 The average monthly pension increased by 30 times. 🔷 Unemployment decreased by 65%, dropping to 4.6%. 🔷 Average life expectancy rose to 73 years (for men, from 59 to 68.5 years; for women, from 72 to 78.4 years). 🔷 Free Healthcare and Education Family support 🔷 Financial support to families upon the birth or adoption of their second and subsequent children 🔷 Employed parents can take up to 3 years of parental leave 🔷Housing Support: Special programs provide discounts on mortgage interest rates for families with children 🔷 Families with children are entitled to tax deductions, including reduced income tax for working parents 🔷 Families raising children with disabilities receive additional financial assistance, including monthly care payments Military and Security 🔷 Russia’s military is considered one of the strongest globally, ranked either first (U.S. News & World Report) or second (Global Firepower Index). 🔷 Crime rates, including murders, assaults, and robberies, decreased by 53% during Putin’s presidency. The homicide rate dropped by 74%.

Saved - May 14, 2025 at 12:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2025, we witness the end of the post-Cold War era, with multipolarity emerging as a significant force. The West faces challenges from a hollowed-out economy and rising global powers like BRICS, which now includes over 11 nations. The "rules-based order" is fading, as the Global South seeks trade in local currencies and a voice in global matters. Cultural tensions and economic turmoil in the West highlight a shift towards nationalism and a potential collapse. The 21st century's power dynamics are being redefined, moving away from Western dominance.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🚨🤔 2025: THE GREAT SHIFT Trump's administration marks the END of the post-Cold War era. The West may COLLAPSE as multipolarity takes hold, says Alexander Yakovenko, Deputy Director of Rossiya Segodnya media group. Here’s how it’s gonna be🧵 https://t.co/75lJcpg0qV

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

❓HOW WE GOT HERE ➡️ 1990s: Post-Cold War, NATO expanded east—ignoring Russia. ➡️ US bet on dollar dominance & outsourcing to China. ➡️ Result: A hollowed-out West, hooked on sanctions & coups. The unipolar moment backfired. 2/10 https://t.co/NfuwjSKsjh

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🇷🇺 RUSSIA’S RED LINE CROSSED 2014 Maidan, 2022 Ukraine war. Each time the West pushed — but Russia pushed back harder. Sanctions failed. The ruble survived. BRICS grew. Now, 80% of the world refuses to isolate Russia. 3/10 https://t.co/RHXVzjlfbX

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🙌GREAT UNRAVELING ● EU deindustrializing, paying 5X energy costs ● US debt spiral, inflation, & political chaos ● Russia’s economy outpaces Europe (4.1% growth in 2024) ● BRICS+ now 11 nations, with 20+ more lining up 4/10 https://t.co/DuRIza29xj

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🌐NEW WORLD ORDER The "rules-based order" is dead. The Global South wants: ✅ Trade in local currencies ✅ No more Western lectures ✅ A seat at the table Bottom line: The West’s unipolar moment is over. Multipolarity won. 5/10 https://t.co/Fe9vaarnVB

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🚨LIBERAL COLLAPSE & CULTURAL WARS ● Elites pushed radical LGBT* agendas, erasing history & parental rights ● BLM riots, woke censorship, & "positive discrimination" shattered social cohesion ● Biden's mail-in voting "victory" over Trump (despite +11M votes) exposed systemic rot *banned in Russia 6/10

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🇺🇸TRUMP’S NATIONALIST REVOLUTION ➡️ MAGA 2.0: Two genders only, family values, end of green/globalist dogma ➡️ Economic Warfare: 185-country tariffs, EU/China targeted, reindustrialization via Europe’s collapse ➡️ Arctic Expansion: Eyeing Canada/Greenland to match Russia’s resource dominance 7/10

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

💸DOLLAR’S DEATH SPIRAL ● Debt hits $36T (30% foreign-held) ● Petrodollar erodes as Saudis sell oil in yuan ● Fed trapped: inflation vs. bank meltdowns 8/10 https://t.co/q0J7Hmqycl

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

☠️WEST’S COMING COLLAPSE The EU weakens, Germany stumbles, and Europe faces territorial-political redesign. Nationalist elites may PIVOT TOWARDS GREATER EURASIA. The 21st century’s power map is being redrawn. 9/10 https://t.co/EUYwx5loNg

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🔥RISE OF GLOBAL MAJORITY BRICS+, SCO, and the Global South are building an alternative world order: ● Multipolarity over unipolar dominance ● De-ideologized international relations ● A new trade/financial system outside Western control (bye-bye Bretton Woods?) 10/10 https://t.co/3Kiv4uQPs9

Saved - June 2, 2025 at 3:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On December 31, 1999, I delivered my resignation speech, stepping down as Russia's first president and transferring power to Vladimir Putin. In this emotional farewell, I reflected on the challenges of our post-Soviet journey, sought forgiveness for unmet expectations, and expressed hope for a new generation of leaders. My address combined vulnerability with determination, paving the way for Putin's ascent while highlighting my efforts to move away from totalitarianism and my faith in the Russian people's wisdom.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Yeltsin’s Last Message to Russia Before Transferring Power to Putin (1999) Boris Yeltsin’s historic resignation speech on December 31, 1999, in which he unexpectedly stepped down as Russia’s first president and handed power to Vladimir Putin. Delivered on the eve of the new millennium, Yeltsin’s emotional farewell acknowledges the struggles of Russia’s post-Soviet transformation, asks forgiveness for unfulfilled hopes, and expresses confidence in a new generation of leaders. The address—marked by both vulnerability and resolve—set the stage for Putin’s rise while framing Yeltsin’s legacy as a leader who, despite flaws, sought to break from totalitarianism and trusted the Russian people’s wisdom.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dear fellow Russians, I am addressing you for the last time as President of Russia. I have made the decision to resign today, on the last day of the outgoing century. I am stepping down before my term expires because Russia must enter the new millennium with new politicians. Seeing the hope in the Duma elections for a new generation, I realized I have accomplished the most important task of my life: Russia will never return to the past. I must not stand in the way of this natural course of history. I ask for your forgiveness for the fact that many of our shared dreams did not come true. The pain of each of you echoed as pain in me. I am leaving because a new generation is taking my place. Upon resigning, I have signed a decree transferring the duties of the president of Russia to the chairman of the government, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. Presidential elections will be held in three months. Be happy. You deserve happiness and peace. Happy New Year. Happy New Century.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dear fellow Russians. Very little time remains until the magical date in our history. The year February is approaching. A new century. A new millennium. We have all imagined this date in relation to ourselves, estimating first as children, then as adults. How old we would be in the year February, how old our mothers would be, and how old our children would be. Once, it seemed that this extraordinary New Year was so far away. And now, this day has arrived. Dear friends, my dear ones, Today, I am addressing you with a New Year's greeting for the last time. But that is not all. Today, I am addressing you as the president of Russia for the last time. I have made a decision. I pondered it long and painfully. Today, on the last day of the outgoing century, I am resigning. I have heard many times Yeltsin will cling to power by any means. He will not give it up to anyone. That is a lie. The issue is different. I have always said that I would not deviate from the constitution by even a step, that the Duma elections must take place within the constitutional time frame. And so it happened. I also wanted the presidential elections to take place on time in June 2000. This was very important for Russia. We are setting the most important precedent of a civilized, voluntary transfer of power from one president of Russia to another newly elected one. And yet, I have made a different decision. I am stepping down, leaving before my term expires. I understood that I must do this. Russia must enter the new millennium with new politicians, with new faces, with new intelligent, strong, energetic people. And we, those who have held power for many years, we must leave. Seeing with what hope and faith people voted in the Douma elections for a new generation of politicians, I realized I have accomplished the most important task of my life. Russia will never return to the past. Russia will now always move only forward. And I must not stand in the way of this natural course of history. Should I cling to power for another six months? When the country has a strong man worthy of being president, with whom almost every Russian today associates their hopes for the future. Why should I hinder him? Why wait another six months? No. That is not like me. Not in my character. Today, on this extraordinarily important day for me, I want to say a little more personal words than I usually do. I want to ask for your forgiveness, for the fact that many of our shared dreams did not come true. And what seemed simple to us turned out to be excruciatingly difficult. I ask forgiveness for not fulfilling some of the hopes of those people. Who believed that we could leap in one bound, in one swift motion. From the gray, stagnant, totalitarian past into a bright, prosperous, civilized future. I, too, believed in this. It seemed that with one decisive push, we would overcome everything. It did not work out in one leap. In some ways, I was too naive. In others, the problems turned out to be too complex. We pushed forward through mistakes, through failures. Many people endured upheaval during this difficult time. But I want you to know: I have never said this before. But today, it is important for me to tell you. The pain of each of you echoed as pain in me, in my heart. Sleepless nights, tormenting thoughts. What must be done so that people could live even a little, even slightly easier, and better. I had no more important task. I am leaving. I have done all I could. And not because of health, but because of the totality of all problems. A new generation is taking my place. A generation of those who can do more and do better. In accordance with the constitution, upon resigning, I have signed a decree transferring the duties of the president of Russia to the chairman of the government, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. For three months, in accordance with the constitution, he will serve as head of state. And in three months, also in accordance with the constitution of Russia, Presidential Elections will be held. I have always believed in the remarkable wisdom of the Russian people. That is why I have no doubt about the choice you will make at the March 2000. As I say goodbye, I want to tell each of you: Be happy. You deserve happiness. You deserve happiness and peace. Happy New Year. Happy New Century, my dear ones.
Saved - July 22, 2025 at 6:52 AM

@ricwe123 - Richard

Western leaders used to talk about Putin like he was just another pawn,someone who’d roll over and follow orders. They mistook calculation for weakness and thought he’d play by their rules. Now they’re choking on their arrogance... https://t.co/PNdh89TkWa

Saved - August 18, 2025 at 5:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Vladimir Putin's unique moments as a leader are highlighted in various instances. He honors WWII pilots in Alaska, uses a Russian Ilyushin for travel, and demonstrates martial skills while teaching a child self-defense. He meets a blind journalist and shares a rare public appearance at a WWII monument. Notably, he once startled Angela Merkel with a dog and has had memorable interactions with world leaders, including a warning from Conor McGregor. His influence is evident, as he reflects on historical events and personal connections, showcasing his complex persona.

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

Russia's Longtime Leader Vladimir Putin in Unique situations.🧵 1. Historic moment in Alaska! After summit with President Trump, Putin lays flowers at graves of WWII Soviet pilots, making the Orthodox cross. A nod to shared history amid talks. https://t.co/LTxCqpjaVE

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

2. Vladimir Putin is probably one of the few world leaders who doesn't fly Boeing or Airbus. He uses a Russian-made Ilyushin. https://t.co/92FtsvLaB3

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

3. You don't Mess with Putin 🔥 https://t.co/elGmQp494i

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

4. Putin is teaching a kid how to take down a grown man using body weight https://t.co/h7OSXW45yV

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

5. Vladimir Putin meeting a blind young Russian journalist who 'sees" with touch. https://t.co/rWT6RWekx0

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

6. Justin Trudeau almost finds out what happens when you put your hands on Putin. https://t.co/3Ge0bRWkuF

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

7. When you forget which glass contains poison ... (This video is reversed) https://t.co/GlTHldvna6

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

8. In 2001, Russia’s Most Powerful Oligarch Boris Berezvosky Threatened to Overthrow President Putin and soon he finds out The Power of President Putin. https://t.co/DVsZpFwyYi

Video Transcript AI Summary
-Как вы оцениваете усилия Бориса Березовского в том, что вас в вашем кресле скоро не будет? Спасибо. Борис Березовский это кто? How do you assess Boris Berezovsky's efforts in making sure you will not be in your chair soon? Thank you. Who is Boris Berezovsky?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: -Как вы оцениваете усилия Бориса Березовского в том, что вас в вашем кресле скоро не будет? Спасибо. Борис Березовский это кто?

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

9. Russian President Putin proves why he has a black belt! https://t.co/yfsUmcl10c

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

10. Putin meets his first teacher in Kremlin, the details of conversation remain unknown, but do the feelings need narration? https://t.co/tmotVNhsG0

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

11. Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping bodyguards acknowledging each other https://t.co/PN0kcYZvAN

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

12. Russian President Vladimir Putin is seen making a rare public appearance at a monument honoring the United States cooperation during WWII - just hours before the summit with the President Trump. https://t.co/FEJeBkoQ5o

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

13. In a 2007 meeting, Putin brought in his Dog in front of the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has a phobia of dogs. https://t.co/tGmP60aYke

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

14. Putin draws bizarre smiley face on electric whiteboard in Moscow. https://t.co/lijXkCd5da

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

15. Vladimir Putin was captured on video gesturing a talkative host not to speak while the national anthem is being played. https://t.co/ty7UeoLs83

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

16. President Putin stuns the World by CONFIRMING the Ukraine War NEVER would have started if Donald Trump was President. https://t.co/8yqbXZIkc2

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my former American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return regarding hostilities, and to accept it back then. That's a big mistake. Today, Trump says that if he was the president back then, there would be no war, and I am quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that. I believe that me and President Trump have built a very good, business-like and trustworthy contact, and I have every reason to believe that moving down this path, we can reach the end of the conflict sooner.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American colleague that it should not the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities and accept it quite directly back then. That's a big mistake. Today, when president Trump saying that if he was the president back then, there will be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so. I can confirm that. I think that overall, me and president Trump have built a very good business like and trustworthy contact. And I have every reason to believe that moving down this path, we can come and the sooner the better to the end of the conflict.

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

17. George W. Bush dancing to a Russian folk song with Vladimir Putin in the background. This occurred in Sochi in 2008 but was made public recently to commemorate Putin's 20th year in power. https://t.co/BYnFX7041G

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

18. In 2016, Putin brought his dog Yume into the room in front of two Japanese Journalists. https://t.co/AaGuABdhJM

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

19. Conor McGregor was given a warning for putting his arm over Vladimir Putin. https://t.co/ZHKZ0danbO

@earth_tracker - Earth_Wanderer

20. Putin’s reaction to seeing Russian fighter jets escorting his plane ✈️ https://t.co/wCnaZ9jHxO

Saved - August 21, 2025 at 12:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the complex relationship between Putin and Jewish influence in global politics. I trace Putin's rise from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the perceived exploitation by Jewish oligarchs under Yeltsin, leading to Putin's crackdown on them. I argue that Western media and politicians, often linked to Jewish interests, have portrayed Putin as a dictator while ignoring his efforts to protect Russian sovereignty. I suggest that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the portrayal of Putin are influenced by these dynamics, advocating for a leader like him to counter perceived external control.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why do the jews hate Putin? Why does the mass media spend so Much time trying to rile up the masses to go to war with him? Why does Mark Levin, Brian Krassentein, and Ben Shapiro do everything they can to tell us opposing Putin is in “our interest.” I’ll tell you why. 🧵 1/18 https://t.co/DWNNXAhn73

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

First we must go back and see the roots of what led to Putins rise to power. Remember that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The process of “liberalization” and turning Russias communist economy into a capitalist economy was left up to the planted Jewish puppet, Boris Yeltsin. As you can see he was president from 1991-1999. 🧵 2/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here is one Jewish puppet besides another… (Yeltsin/ Clinton) and you can see how they were working together for the “new world order of the west. -discussions of economic prosperity for Russia -American investment -Nuclear arms deals -Expansion of NATO.. Many may not remember, but when Bill Clinton was not sleeping with Mossad spy Monica Lewinsky, he was very much serving Jewish foreign policy with his overrepresented Jewish leadership in that area… (Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, William Cohen, Victoria Nuland, etc) 🧵 3/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works." "We want Russia to be involved in it." "We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it." "We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that." "So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working." "That is all I can tell you." "The more we say about it, the worse it'll be." "We are moving toward peace." "The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia." "That has not been done yet." "There is no relationship between two"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works. We want Russia to be involved in it. We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it. We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that. So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working. That is all I can tell you. The more we say about it, the worse it'll be. We are moving toward peace. The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia. That has not been done yet. There is no relationship between two
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines three outcomes: (1) there will be a NATO-Russia agreement that all the leaders will support; although they disagree on expansion, they agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. (2) the notion that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions, and that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. (3) they resolved a number of roadblocks relating to START II and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of START II and we would together support guidelines for START III, which we would hope could be negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results. Speaker 1: Just a moment. you've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Different. One, the idea that there will be a NATO Russia agreement that all the leaders will support. That's a significant thing. We agree to disagree about the question of expansion, but we agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. Two, the the notion that that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions. And that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. And third, and I think almost unexpected even among us, we were working along here hoping this would happen. We resolved a number of roadblocks relating to start two and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of start two and we would together support guidelines for START three, which we would hope could be, negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results, and I'm very pleased with them. Wolf? Speaker 1: Just a moment. I'd like to continue for a second longer. You've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. Well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
Video Transcript AI Summary
“I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform.” He notes that in 1993 versus 1992 “the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income,” “inflation was brought down,” and “the stabilization of the currency was improved.” He supports further integrating the Russian economy into a global market system, acknowledges dislocations, and urges assistance so the Russian people know there is effort to address these problems. He predicts benefits will flow in the coming year as trade and investment expand and stresses the need for a social safety net and retraining. He says the people of Russia have to define their own future and rejects the idea that the US directs policy, declaring that as long as we share “the same values and the same vision” he wants to be “an equal partner” because “the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform. If you look at 1993 as compared with 1992, If you look at how much the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income, if you look at how much inflation was brought down, if you look at how much the stabilization of the currency was improved. I think that the continued work toward hooking the Russian economy into a global economic system based on markets is a very sound thing. The we had great long talks about what could be done and what kind of assistance The United States and others could provide to recognize that there are certain dislocations which come from these changes so that the the people of Russia will know that there is an effort being made to deal with those problems. But I also have to tell you that I believe that that the people will begin to benefit in ways that they could not see perhaps last year in the coming year when we have more trade and more investment. And as people around the world and and in The United States in particular see that the president is serious about this, I think the benefits will begin to flow. That plus constructing the kind of social support system and job retraining, unemployment, all those things that just have to be put together and are not easy to put together when you don't have one. I think these things will help a lot. The other point I'd like to make to you sir, is that from my point of view, President Yeltsin has been unfairly criticized in some quarters for his relationship with The United States. The implication that somehow we have tried to direct the course of Russian policy or it is just not accurate and not true. The people of Russia have to define their own future. All I have tried to do is to say that as long as we share the same values and the same vision, as long as we share a dream of of political freedom and economic freedom and respect for our neighbors, I want to be an equal partner because I believe this is a very great nation and that the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed. So I think our relationships in that sense have been quite correct all along and some have sought to miss, characterize them in a way that I think is not accurate.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Speaker 1: Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. Speaker 2: And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here. Speaker 0: Later that day, Clinton received a warmer reception from Boris Yeltsin Yeltsin and issued a warning about Putin. Speaker 3: Bill Clinton looked hard into Yeltsin's eyes and said, I'm a little bit concerned about this young man that you have turned over the presidency to. He doesn't have democracy in his heart. And I will never forget the fa the expression that came over Yeltsin. Speaker 0: Yeltsin's confidants say by the end of his life, he would come to agree with Clinton. Speaker 3: Before Boris Yeltsin died, he told intimates that it was a great mistake for him to have selected Putin as his successor.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Well what’s the problem? Didn’t the Russian people love NATO expansion, economic liberalism, and de-nuclearization? As usual, the United States “sells liberalism” but what they mean is economic exploiting by Jewish capitalist. And Russia was no different. It didn’t take long for the “Semibankirschina” (7 bankers) to own a majority of the assets, and they exploited the Russian people accordingly. And yes most of them were Jews. 🧵 4/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This led into the Russian financial crisis, and ultimately paved the way for a more nationalistic leader to come in. The people were aware of who their exploiters were. They also saw how chummy Yeltsin was with these Jewish oligarchs. Yeltsin was nervous he would be killed during the political unrest, so he needed a strong leader to take over for him, that would also agree to “pardon him.” That politically savvy, and strong leader, was Vladimir Putin. 🧵 5/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the first things Putin did as president was meet with 20 or so of the rich men in Russia. (The predominantly Jewish oligarchs.) He told them flat out, the days of exploitation are done. They could still be rich, but they would have to stay out of his way, and the people would be served first. 🧵 6/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now, these Jewish billionaires did not take to that too kindly, but they shortly found out that Putin was not someone they could simply buy with money, or blackmail with Jeffrey Epstein schemes. Putin started dismantling these Jewish oligarchs from power one by one… -Vladimir Gusinsky -Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Khordorkovsky- Jew ✡️ -Boris Berezovsky- Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Prokhorov- Jew ✡️ This isn’t to say, he randomly singled out Jewish oligarchs. There are still Russian Jewish oligarchs today, but they respect the power that Putin holds. He only went after the ones that were undermining him and Russia, and in doing so he was able to return some assets to the state, and take control of some Of the media companies. 🧵 7/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now some of you are thinking, well those are dictatorial actions. And “he should allow those oligarchs to exploit the people since you know that’s what democracy works.” But you still believe that democracy is “rule of the people.” It is not. Our modern day democracies are rule by media bosses with a mixture of lobbyist during the political process. (Rule of money rather) As such, the interest of a nation are ground down, and the nation is ran by “oligarchs” or in the case of the United States we call them Jewish billionaires. In 2007, Putin lays out his criticisms of NGO’s, the U.S. abuse of power and continued military intervention, the need to refrain from “nato expansion”, and called for a multipolar world. Effectively, after turning Russia around, he told the Jewish led west, he was not going to be pushed around. He also opposed their Talmudic new world order goal, and he has been correct about the detrimental effects of foreign intervention that the U.S. continues to engage in at the behest of the jews… From then on, our Jewish media bosses, state department, and war lords, had it out for Putin.. and they have been trying to overthrow him ever since. 🧵 8/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спикер подчёркивает, что безопасность охватывает военно-политические, экономические и гуманитарные аспекты, и баланс явно нарушен. Он говорит: "ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран", и что "вскрыли бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ" и "формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных" НПО. По его словам, "гуманитарная сфера ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека", но "это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться." Такое вмешательство, по его мнению, "не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными." Он призывает ОБСЕ действовать по задачам и строить отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения и доверия. Россия, с тысячелетней историей, сохраняет независимую внешнюю политику и хочет сотрудничать с ответственными партнерами ради справедливого мироустройства для всех. Speaker notes: English translation of the Russian summary: Speaker emphasizes that security encompasses military-political, economic, and humanitarian aspects, and the balance is clearly broken. He states: "OSCE is trying to turn into a vulgar instrument of pursuing external political interests of one or a group of countries against others," and notes that "the bureaucratic apparatus of the OSCE has been exposed" and that "formally independent, but purposefully financed, and thus controlled" NGOs exist. According to him, "the humanitarian sphere of the OSCE is to assist member states at their request in upholding international norms in the field of human rights," but "this does not mean interference in internal affairs of other countries, and certainly not forcing these states how they should live and develop." Such interference, in his view, "does not contribute to the maturation of genuine democratic states and, on the contrary, makes them dependent and, as a consequence, unstable." He calls on the OSCE to act according to its tasks and to build relations with sovereign states on the basis of respect and trust. Russia, with a thousand-year history, maintains an independent foreign policy and wants to cooperate with responsible partners for a just world order for all, not for the chosen ones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я подчеркну это все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами и учредителями. Вскроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций. Формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем. Но вовсе это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем, мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. Конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2008, Jewish puppets John McCain (funded by the bronfman family) and Barrack Obama both have the same foreign policy and talking points when it comes to dealing with Putin. He’s a dictator, and the “west” needs to stand up to him… Meanwhile they slyly discuss how more Eastern European nations need to come under NATO (world Jewish control.) A no go for a nationalist like Putin. 🧵 9/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues Russia is a nation fueled by petrodollars and a KGB apparatchik run government, saying, "I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b." He calls Georgia's aggression unacceptable and links it to energy, noting "a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey" and that "the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe." He cites solidarity from Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine in Tbilisi, and warns Russia aims to revive the "old Russian empire." The United States will "support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine" into NATO, while Russia is "in violation of their ceasefire agreement" and has stationed troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. He recalls a Georgian poster "Vladimir Putin, our president" and says "watch Ukraine" as Crimea and Sevastopol are cited; "we are their friend and ally." Senator McCain and I agree.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Russia has now become a nation fueled by petrodollars that is basically a KGB apparatchik run government. I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b. And their aggression in Georgia is not acceptable behavior. I do believe that we need to bolster our friends and allies, and that wasn't just about a a problem between Georgia and Russia. It had everything to do with energy. There's a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey. And, of course, we know that the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe, which they have used from time to time. It's not accidental that the presence of Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine flew to Georgia, flew to Tbilisi, where I have spent significant amount of time with a great young president, Misha Sakashvili. And they showed solidarity with them, but also they are very concerned about the Russian threats to regain their status of the old Russian empire. Now I think the Russians ought to understand that we will support. We, The United States, will support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine and and the the natural process inclusion into NATO. We also want to make it very clear that the Russians are in violation of their ceasefire agreement. They have stationed additional troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. By the way, I went there once, and we went inside and drove in, and there was a huge poster. And this is this is Georgian territory, and there was a huge picture of Vladimir Putin, and it said, Vladimir Putin, our president. It was very clear, the Russian intentions towards Georgia. They were just waiting to seize the opportunity. So this is a very difficult situation. We wanna work with the Russians, but we also have every right to expect the Russians to behave in a fashion in keeping with a with a with a country who respects international boundaries and the norms of international behavior. And watch Ukraine. This whole thing is a got a lot to do with Ukraine, Crimea, the base of the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, and the breakdown of the political process in Ukraine between Temushchenko and Yushchenko is a very serious problem. So watch Ukraine, and let's make sure that we that the Ukrainians understand that we are their friend and ally. Senator, do you have a major difference with what he just said? No. Actually, think senator McCain and I agree for

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2012, when Hillary Clinton and our state department was lying to our faces about what Assad was doing and why, Putin and Russia were backing Assad. Saying that if Assad fell, Syria could fall into a perpetual civil war, and that they didn’t believe the reports of Assad using “chemical weapons.” Fast forward to now where Syria is a mess and the only country that benefited from Assads fall was Israel. Now it’s easy to see why the jews in our government wanted to get rid of Putin. 🧵 10/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. Norway and our other European allies have been strong, consistent voices on behalf of the Syrian people, and I commend them for their advocacy. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. There has been a crescendo of condemnation, not only from the world, but in particular from the region. After the Security Council statement, we've seen movement in rapid succession from the Arab League, the GCC, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and others. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. In particular, we urge those countries still buying Syrian oil and gas, those countries still sending Assad weapons, those countries whose political and economic support give him comfort in his brutality to get on the right side of history. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways. Now it is something that we are
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? In Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2014, the U.S. state department led by jews like Victoria Nuland, staged a coup against the duly elected president Victor Yanukovych. What was Yanukovychs crime? He was too pro Russian, and was not necessarily going to push the boundaries for NATO expansion. So you can see the international jews went to work, with George Soros funding dissidents, the Jewish American media machine saying Yanukovych was not elected properly, and Jewish state department rep Victoria Nuland even handing out cookies to Ukrainian dissidents. This led to Putin invading and annexing the Crimea. 🧵 11/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 1989 revolutions, you funded dissident activities and civil society groups in Eastern Europe, including Poland and the Czech Republic; are you doing similar work in Ukraine? He replies that he set up a foundation in Ukraine before its independence from Russia, and that the foundation has functioned ever since and played an important part in events now. He says Ukraine can assert independence from Russia and move toward the West, though Putin will try to destabilize it; the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent, and with freedom, free media, and a flourishing economy, his regime would be unsustainable. He is asked about antisemitism in Ukraine; he notes antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world, and there is antisemitism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many people recognized about you was that you, during the revolutions of nineteen eighty nine, funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, The Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of, Russia, and the foundation has been, functioning ever since. And it played an important part in events now. Speaker 0: Do you think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of independence from Russia, and an alignment, with the West? Not not a specific alignment as a NATO, but a kind of orientation toward the West, or will the Russians always stop them? Speaker 1: No. Putin will try to destabilize, Ukraine, but the Ukrainians, the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent of of Russia. It won't be easy because Putin, has, staked his regime on destabilizing Ukraine because it's a threat to to his regime in Russia. If you have freedom, free media, and so on, and a flourishing economy, that would, make his regime, unsustainable. Speaker 0: He accuses the Ukrainians of being antisemitic, of them being full of antisemitic fascists. You operate in Ukraine. You're of Jewish origin. Have you detected virulent antisemitism in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world. So there is antisemit

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Remember the “Russian Collusion hoax” of 2017? Did you know that research was funded by a Jew named Paul Singer?? 🧐 Obviously Trump was acquitted, but the intended effect was missed by many. It was to be associated with Russia, is a crime. Remember that Trump ran on “warming relations” With the Russians. Well that was pretty much iced by this fake scandal, and so it worked. 🧵 12/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Then we have the 2nd impeachment hoax. Also involving Ukraine/Russia, but what was the crux of the matter? That Trump was going to withhold weapons from Ukraine…. A no no for our Jewish oligarchs. Thus this scandal provided the same effect yet again. Trump affirms his support of Ukraine, and distances himself from Russia, and everyone is afraid to tell the truth about Russia, or they will be labeled a “foreign agent” because Ukraine is our potential NATO ally. Well it’s not our ally. It’s manufactured state created by NATO and currently ran by a coke head Jew Zelensky …. Did you also know that the guy that “leaked” scandalous phone call for Trumps 2nd impeachment was also Jewish? What are the odds…. 🧵 13/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Never forget how Zelensky came to power in Ukraine and who funded his rise… Before he was killed in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira laid out exactly how Zelensky was manufactured and funded by Israeli Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky. And that same billionaire Kolomoisky, was the Jew who had a controlling interest in Burisma… the gas company that was paying Hunter Biden 50k a month. Oh a tangled web the Jews weave to blackmail/ buy influence… 🧵 14/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky is 'the cokehead of Kyiv' and 'a manufactured political figure' created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, owner of OnePlusOne Media, which financed and produced 'Servant of the People.' 'Servant of the People' hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, to play the role of the President. Kolomoyski created a party called 'Servant of the People' and financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire; 'he's the finger puppet of Kolomsky.' Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden to the tune of $50,000 a month on Burisma's Board of Directors in 2014. 'Hunter Biden' and Zelensky are 'spiritual cousins' bankrolled by the same guy. The laptop mentions a 10% kickback to 'the old man.' The White House is freaking out over Ukraine; Westerners exploited Ukraine; Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, And OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelenskyy, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show. It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly. Kolomoisky, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest. Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch. And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden. Yes, in 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma? Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins. They are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine. But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad who's President of The United States, now does he? Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, see, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets, monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine. This is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe, of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it. Hunter Biden? $50,000 a month. And you say to yourself, well, thousand isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States. In Ukraine, a much poorer country, $50,000 a year, easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year. And Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh yeah. Look it up. You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden. God alone knows who else he was financing, and he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine, and they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

After the Jews had their Zelensky puppet installed, and they their Jewish Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, they finally pushed Putin to the breaking point. He then invaded Ukraine in 2022. And the lying Jewish controlled mass media tells us, “Putin is crazy” and he is slaughtering Slavs. But he’s not. He’s been very strategic in trying to limit loss of life. And our lying media leaves out the fact that this was a totally Jewish provoked war, for NATO power expansion. They also always leave out the fact that the jews and the U.S. state department (one and the same) overthrew the Ukrainian regime in 2014…. 🧵 15/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

And if Putin is such an oppressive awful leader, like our Jewish media tells us, why then is Russia still allowed to be Russian? Putin has outlawed Gay Marriage, Transgender madness, and no one is going to jail for being proud to be a “White Russian.” In other words, Putin has shielded his people from the pernicious Jewish influence that is destroying the west right now. Under Putin, the Russian economy has done quite well from where it was in 1999. Also the debt situation and natural resource situation in Russia is great. Further the Russian Orthodox Church has done exceptionally well under Putins leadership. Meanwhile many brainwashed Christians in the west are serving Jews for the expansion of Israel while our nation fails. Putin even allowed for Edward Snowden to seek Asylum in Russia and has protected him against our blood thirsty government and its Jewish controllers… 🧵 16/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Is Putin an out an out antisemite? No. He is not. He even has Jewish friends and the like, but clearly he is a nationalist, and he is opposed to the Jewish new world order. While he may not name them explicitly, he names them implicitly…. Like in these 2 clips where he describes the “American media propaganda machine” the “bankers”, and who really blew up Nordstream… 🧵 17/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But but here's a question you may be able to answer. You worked in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? Speaker 1: This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

So the jews and the west will continue do what they can to “pray for Putins death” as Krassenstein says below. But America should see through the propaganda. We need a leader very much like Putin if we are to ever overcome our Jewish overlords. If not, we will continue to see non white immigration, transgender lunacy, and wars in the Middle East (and Ukraine) for Israel… If you enjoyed this thread, Consider subscribing to the page! 🧵 18/18

Saved - February 15, 2026 at 7:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall Putin’s 2007 Munich warning that Russia would resist NATO expansion, exposing the hypocrisy of the post-Cold War “rules-based order.” He criticised a unipolar world and US wars, warned Europe’s missile defense could upset the nuclear balance and spark a new arms race, and noted those concerns were ignored, with Ukraine’s war and rising Russia–NATO tensions the result.

@afshinrattansi - Afshin Rattansi

If you’ve seen the circus at the Munich Security Conference this year, here’s a throwback to a speech with actual consequence: Vladimir Putin’s 2007 Munich Security Conference speech represented Russia🇷🇺 openly exposing the hypocrisy of the post-Cold War ‘rules-based order’ and Russia declaring that it would not tolerate NATO expansion onto its borders to encircle Moscow. As NATO expansion steamrolled ahead with Moscow’s concerns ignored for years, Putin warned Russia would resist the expansion. He criticised the emergence of a unipolar world, where the US abused its power with endless wars and military interventions. He warned that the US’ missile defence plans in Europe were a threat to the nuclear strategic balance, which could trigger a new arms race. Russia’s concerns were ignored or ridiculed for years, the Ukraine proxy war and the current dangerous tensions between Russia and NATO are the consequences.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that international security is broader than military-political stability and includes global economic stability, poverty reduction, economic security, and civilizational dialogue. He emphasizes the principle that security of each is security of all, recalling Franklin Roosevelt’s idea that “wherever peace is violated, peace everywhere is threatened.” He asserts that two decades ago the world was split ideologically and economically, with security provided by the large strategic potential of two superpowers, and that global confrontation has moved to the periphery of international relations, leaving acute economic and social issues unresolved. He criticizes the unipolar world as not achievable or acceptable, defining it as one center of power and one center of decision-making, a model he says is not democracy and ultimately destructive for both the ruled and the ruler. He notes that unilateral, illegitimate actions have not solved problems and have caused new tragedies and tens of thousands of civilian deaths. He points to the increasing and unchecked use of force in international affairs, the neglect of core principles of international law, and the tendency to resolve issues on the basis of political expediency. The speaker highlights new threats such as weapons of mass destruction and terrorism, arguing for a balanced approach that considers the interests of all international actors. He notes the rapid changes in the international landscape, including the rise of China and India, whose combined GDP (at PPP) surpasses the US, and BRICS collectively surpassing the EU, predicting that economic power will increasingly translate into political influence and strengthen multipolarity. He calls for multilateral diplomacy, openness, transparency, and predictability, with force used only as an exceptional measure and in accordance with the UN Charter, not as a substitute for collective security institutions such as the UN, NATO, or the EU. The speaker defends adherence to international treaties on nonproliferation and disarmament, recalling Russia’s agreement with the US to cut strategic nuclear weapons to 1700–2200 deployable warheads by December 31, 2012, and emphasizes Russia’s commitment to the NPT and multilateral controls on missile technologies. He critiques the proliferation of missile systems in various countries and the existence of new high-tech weapons, including space-based systems, warning that militarization of space could have consequences comparable to the nuclear era. He announces a Russian proposal for a Space Weapons Prevention Treaty and discusses concerns about missile defense deployments in Europe, arguing they provoke a new arms race and distrust. Regarding conventional forces in Europe, he criticizes the Adapted CFE Treaty for insufficient ratification and notes NATO’s expansion near Russian borders, arguing that such expansion reduces mutual trust. He recalls a 1990 NATO secretary-general statement about not placing troops beyond Germany’s borders and stresses that Russia seeks an independent foreign policy with responsible partners to build a fair and democratic world order for all. He also discusses energy cooperation, arguing that energy prices should be market-driven and that foreign capital participates significantly in Russian oil production, with investments in Russia exceeding Russian investments abroad by about 15:1. He mentions Russia’s ongoing WTO accession and criticizes double standards in poverty alleviation, noting how aid and subsidies can perpetuate economic underdevelopment and fuel radicalism and conflict. Finally, he defends the OSCE as a body intended to address security in a holistic way but contends it has been used to serve external interests and to finance NGOs that may interfere in internal affairs. He calls for the OSCE to respect sovereignty and for cooperation based on mutual trust. He closes by reaffirming Russia’s longstanding tradition of independent external policy and expresses a desire to work with responsible, independent partners to build a just, democratic world order that ensures security and prosperity for all.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Спасибо большое, уважаемая госпожа Федеральный канцлер, господин Тельчик, дамы и господа! Весьма признателен за приглашение на столь представительную конференцию, собравшую политиков, военных, предпринимателей, экспертов из более чем 40 стран мира. Формат конференции даёт мне возможность избежать излишнего политеса и необходимости говорить округлыми, приятными, но пустыми дипломатическими штампами. Формат Конференции позволяет сказать то, что я действительно думаю о проблемах международной безопасности. И если мои рассуждения покажутся нашим коллегам излишне полемически заострёнными либо неточными, я прошу на меня не сердиться, это ведь только Конференция. И надеюсь, что после двух-трех минут моего выступления господин Тельчик не включит там красный свет. Итак, известно, что проблематика международной безопасности много шире вопросов военно-политической стабильности. Это устойчивость мировой экономики, преодоление бедности, экономическая безопасность и развитие межцивилизационного диалога. Такой всеобъемлющий неделимый характер безопасности выражен и в её базовом принципе. Безопасность каждого это безопасность всех. Как сказал ещё в первые дни разгоравшейся Второй мировой войны Франклин Рузвельт, где бы ни был нарушен мир, мир повсюду оказывается в безопасности и под угрозой. Эти слова продолжают сохранять актуальность и сегодня. Об этом свидетельствует и тема нашей конференции, которая здесь написана Глобальные кризисы, глобальная ответственность. Всего лишь два десятилетия назад мир был идеологически и экономически расколот, а его безопасность обеспечивали огромные стратегические потенциалы двух сверхдержав. Глобальное противостояние отодвигало на периферию международных отношений и повестки дня крайне острые экономические и социальные вопросы. И как всякая война, война холодная, оставила нам и не разорвавшиеся снаряды, образно выражаясь. Имею в виду идеологические стереотипы, двойные стандарты, иные шаблоны блокового мышления. Предлагаевшийся же после холодной войны однополярный мир тоже не состоялся. История человечества, конечно, знает и периоды однополярного состояния, и стремления к мировому господству. Чего только не было в истории человечества. Однако что же такое однополярный мир? Как бы ни украшали этот термин, он в конечном итоге означает на практике только одно это один центр власти, один центр силы, один центр принятия решения. Это мир одного хозяина, одного суверена, и это в конечном итоге губительно не только для всех, кто находится в рамках этой системы, но и для самого суверена, потому что разрушает его изнутри. И это ничего общего не имеет, конечно, с демократией. Потому что демократия это, как известно, власть большинства при учёте интересов и мнения меньшинства. Кстати говоря, Россию нас постоянно учат демократии, но те, кто нас учат, сами почему-то учиться не очень хотят. Считаю, что для современного мира однополярная модель не только неприемлема, но и вообще невозможна. И не только потому, что при единоличном лидерстве в современном, именно в современном мире не будет хватать ни военно-политических, ни экономических Но, что ещё важнее, сама модель является неработающей, так как в её основе нет и не может быть морально-нравственной базы современной цивилизации. Вместе с тем всё, что происходит сегодня в мире и сейчас мы только начали дискутировать об этом, это следствие попыток внедрения именно этой концепции мировые дела, концепции однополярного мира. А какой результат? Односторонние, нелегитимные часто действия не решили ни одной проблемы. Более того, они стали генератором новых человеческих трагедий и очагов напряжённости. Судите сами: войн, локальных и региональных конфликтов меньше не стало. Господин Тельчик об этом очень мягко упомянул. И людей в этих конфликтах гибнет не меньше, а даже больше, чем раньше. Значительно больше. Сегодня мы наблюдаем почти ничем не сдерживаемое гипертрофированное применение силы в международных делах, военной силы, ввергающей мир в пучину следующих один за другим конфликтов. В результате не хватает сил на комплексное решение ни одного из них. Становится невозможным и их политическое решение. Мы видим все большее пренебрежение основополагающими принципами международного права. Больше того, отдельные нормы, да по сути чуть ли не вся система права одного государства, прежде всего конечно Соединённых Штатов, перешагнула свои национальные границы и по сути во всех сферах и в экономике, и в политике, и в гуманитарной сфере навязывается другим государствам. Но кому это понравится? В международных делах всё чаще встречается стремление решить тот или иной вопрос, исходя из так называемой политической целесообразности, основанной на текущей конъюнктуре. И это, конечно, крайне опасно и ведёт к тому, что никто уже не чувствует себя в безопасности. Я хочу это подчеркнуть никто не чувствует себя в безопасности, потому что никто не может спрятаться за международным правом как за каменной стеной. Такая политика является, конечно, катализатором гонки вооружений. Доминирование фактора силы неизбежно подпитывает тягу ряда стран к обладанию оружием массового уничтожения. Больше того, появились принципиально новые угрозы, которые и раньше были известны, но сегодня приобретают глобальный характер, такие как терроризм. Убежден, мы подошли к тому рубежному моменту, когда должны серьезно задуматься над всей архитектурой глобальной безопасности. И здесь надо отталкиваться от поиска разумного баланса между интересами всех субъектов международного общения. Тем более сейчас, когда международный ландшафт столь ощутимо и столь быстро меняется, меняется за счёт динамичного развития целого ряда государств и регионов. Госпожа Федеральный Канцлер упомянул уже об этом. Так, суммарный ВВП Индии и Китая по паритетной покупательной способности уже больше, чем у Соединённых Штатов Америки. А рассчитанные по тому же принципу ВВП государств группы Бразилия, Россия, Индия, Китай превосходят совокупный ВВП Евросоюза. И по оценкам экспертов, в обозримой исторической перспективе этот разрыв будет только возрастать. Не стоит сомневаться, что экономический потенциал новых центров мирового роста будет неизбежно конвертироваться в политическое влияние и укреплять будет многополярность. В этой связи серьезно возрастает роль многосторонней дипломатии. Открытость, транспарентность и предсказуемость политики безальтернативны, а применение силы должно быть действительно исключительной мерой, так же как и применение смертной казни в правовых системах некоторых государств. Сегодня же мы, наоборот, наблюдаем ситуацию, когда страны, в которых применение смертной казни запрещено даже в отношении убийц и других преступников, опасных преступников. Несмотря на это, такие стороны легко идут на участие в военных операциях, которые трудно назвать легитимными. А ведь в этих конфликтах гибнут люди, сотни, тысячи мирных людей. Но в то же время возникает вопрос: разве мы должны безучастно и безвольно взирать на различные внутренние конфликты в отдельных странах, на действия авторитарных режимов, тиранов, на распространение оружия массового уничтожения? Именно по сути это и лежало в основе вопроса, который был задан федеральному канцлеру нашим уважаемым коллегой господином Либерманном. Можем ли мы безучастно смотреть на то, что происходит? Я попробую ответить на ваш вопрос тоже. Конечно, мы не должны смотреть безучастно, конечно, нет. Но есть ли у нас средства противостоять этим угрозам? Конечно, есть. Достаточно вспомнить недавнюю историю. Ведь произошел же мирный переход к демократии в нашей стране. Ведь состоялась же мирная трансформация советского режима, мирная трансформация. И какого режима? С каким количеством оружия, в том числе ядерного оружия? Почему же сейчас при каждом удобном случае нужно бомбить и стрелять? Неужели в условиях отсутствия угрозы взаимного уничтожения нам не хватает политической культуры, уважения к ценностям демократии и к праву? Убеждён, единственным механизмом принятия решения по использованию военной силы как последнего довода может быть только устав ООН. И в этой связи я или не понял то, что было сказано совсем недавно нашим коллегой, министром обороны Италии, либо он выразился неточно, я, во всяком случае, услышал, что легитимным применение силы может считаться только в том случае, если решение принято в НАТО, или в Евросоюзе, или в ООН. Если он действительно так считает, то у нас с ним разные точки зрения. Или я ослышался. Легитимным можно считать применение силы, только если решение принято на основе и в рамках ООН. И не надо подменять Организацию Объединённых Наций ни НАТО, ни Евросоюза. И когда ООН будет реально объединять силы международного сообщества, которое действительно может реагировать на события в отдельных странах. Когда мы избавимся от пренебрежения международным правом, то ситуация может измениться. В противном случае ситуация будет заходить лишь в тупик и умножать количество тяжелых ошибок. При этом, конечно, нужно добиваться того, чтобы международное право имело универсальный характер и в понимании, и в применении норм. И нельзя забывать, что демографический образ действий в политике обязательно предполагает дискуссию и кропотливую выработку решений. Уважаемые дамы и господа, потенциальная опасность дестабилизации международных отношений связана и с очевидным застоем в области разоружения. Россия выступает за возобновление диалога по этому важнейшему вопросу. Важно сохранить устойчивость международно-правовой разоруженческой базы, при этом обеспечить преемственность процесса сокращения ядерных вооружений. Мы договорились с Соединёнными Штатами Америки о сокращении наших ядерных потенциалов на стратегических носителях до 1700-2200 ядерных боезарядов к 31 декабря 2012 года. Россия намерена строго выполнять взятые на себя обязательства. Надеемся, что и наши партнеры будут действовать также транспарентно и не будут откладывать на чёрный день лишнюю пару сотен ядерных боезарядов. И если сегодня Новый Министр обороны США здесь нам объявят, что США не будут прятать эти заряды лишние ни на складах, ни под подушкой, ни под одеялом. Я предлагаю всем встать и стоя это поприветствовать. Это было бы очень важным заявлением. Россия строго придерживается и намерена в дальнейшем придерживаться Договора о нераспространении ядерного оружия и многостороннего режима контроля за ракетными технологиями. Принципы, заложенные в этих документах, носят универсальный характер. В этой связи хотел бы вспомнить, что в восьмидесятых годах СССР и Соединённые Штаты подписали договор о ликвидации целого класса ракет средней и малой, но универсального характера этому документу предано не было. Сегодня такие ракеты уже имеет целый ряд стран: Корейская Народно-Демократическая Республика, Республика Корея, Индия, Иран, Пакистан, Израиль. Многие другие государства мира разрабатывают эти системы и планируют поставить их на вооружение. И только Соединённые Штаты Америки и Россия несут обязательства не создавать подобных систем вооружений. Ясно, что в этих условиях мы вынуждены задуматься об обеспечении своей собственной безопасности. Вместе с тем нельзя допустить появления новых дестабилизирующих высокотехнологичных видов оружия. Я уже не говорю о мерах по предупреждению новых сфер конфронтации, особенно в космосе. Звёздные войны, как известно, уже не фантастика, а реальность. Ещё в середине 80-х годов наши американские партнёры на практике провели перехват собственного спутника. Милитаризация космоса, по мнению России, может спровоцировать непредсказуемые для мирового сообщества последствия, не меньшие, чем начало ядерной эры. И мы не раз выступали с инициативами, направленными на недопущение оружия в космос. Сегодня хотел бы проинформировать Вас о том, что нами подготовлен проект Договора о предотвращении размещения оружия в космическом пространстве. В ближайшее время он будет направлен партнерам в качестве официального предложения. Давайте работать над этим вместе. Нас также не могут не тревожить планы по развертыванию элементов системы противоракетной обороны в Европе. Кому нужен очередной виток неизбежной в этом случае гонки вооружений? Глубоко сомневаюсь, что самим европейцем. Ракетного оружия, реально угрожающего Европе, с дальностью действия порядка пяти-восьми тысяч километров нет ни у одной так называемой проблемных стран. И будущем в обозримой перспективе и не появится, и не предвидится даже. Гипотетический пуск, например, северокорейской ракеты по территории США через Западную Европу это явно противоречит законам баллистики. Как говорят у нас в России, это всё равно что правой рукой дотягиваться до левого уха. Находясь здесь, в Германии, не могу не упомянуть и о кризисном состоянии Договора об обычных вооружённых силах в Европе. Адаптированный Договор об обычных вооружённых силах в Европе был подписан в 1999 году. Он учитывал новую геополитическую реальность ликвидацию Варшавского блока. С тех пор прошло семь лет, и только четыре государства ратифицировали этот документ, включая Российскую Федерацию. Страны НАТО открыто заявили, что не ратифицируют договор, включая положение о фланговых ограничениях, о размещении на флангах определенного количества вооруженных сил, до тех пор, пока Россия не выведет свои базы из Грузии и Молдавии. Из Грузии наши войска выводятся, причём даже в ускоренном порядке. Эти проблемы мы с нашими грузинскими коллегами решили, и это всем известно. В Молдавии остаётся группировка в полторы тысячи военнослужащих, которые выполняют миротворческие функции и охраняют склады с боеприпасами, оставшиеся со времён СССР. И мы с господином Саланой обсуждаем постоянно этот вопрос, он знает нашу позицию, мы готовы и дальше работать по этому направлению. Но что же происходит в это же самое время? А в это самое время в Болгарии и Румынии появляются так называемые легкие американские передовые базы по пять тысяч штыков в каждой. Получается, что НАТО выдвигает свои передовые силы к нашим государственным границам, а мы, строго выполняя договор, никак не реагируем на это действие. Думаю, очевидно, процесс натовского расширения не имеет никакого отношения к модернизации самого альянса или к обеспечению безопасности в Европе. Наоборот, это серьёзно провоцирующий фактор, снижающий уровень взаимного доверия. И у нас есть справедливое право откровенно спросить, против кого это расширение, и что стало с теми заверениями, которые давались западными партнёрами после роспуска Варшавского договора. Где теперь эти заявления? О них даже никто не помнит, но я позволю себе напомнить в этой аудитории. Хотел бы привести цитату из выступления Генерального секретаря НАТО господина Вернера в Брюсселе 17 мая 90 года. Он тогда сказал: Сам факт, что мы готовы не размещать войска НАТО за пределами территории ФРГ, дает Советскому Союзу твердые гарантии. И бетонные блоки Берлинской стены давно разошлись на сувениры. Но нельзя забывать, что её падение стало возможным в том числе и благодаря историческому выбору в том числе нашего народа, народа России, выбору в пользу демократии и свободы, открытости и искреннего партнёрства со всеми членами большой европейской семьи. Сейчас же нам пытаются навязать уже новые разделительные линии стены, пусть виртуальные, но все-таки разделяющие, разрезающие наш общий континент. Неужели вновь потребуются долгие годы и десятилетия, смена нескольких поколений политиков, чтобы разобрать и демонтировать эти новые стены? Уважаемые дамы и господа, мы однозначно выступаем и за укрепление режима нераспространения. Существующая международно-правовая база позволяет создать технологии по выработке ядерного топлива для использования его в мирных целях. И многие страны с полным на то основанием хотят создавать собственную ядерную энергетику как основу их энергетической независимости. Но мы также понимаем, что эти технологии могут быть быстро трансформированы в получение оружейных материалов. Это вызывает серьёзное международное напряжение. Яркий тому пример ситуация с иранской ядерной программой. Если международное сообщество не выработает разумного решения этого конфликта интересов, мир и дальше будет потрясать подобные дестабилизирующие кризисы, потому что пороговых стран больше, чем Иран, и мы с вами об этом знаем. Мы будем постоянно сталкиваться с угрозой распространения оружия массового уничтожения. В прошлом году Россия выступила с инициативой создания многонациональных центров по обогащению урана. Мы открыты к тому, чтобы подобные центры создавались не только в России, но и в других странах, где на легитимной основе существует мирная ядерная энергетика. Государства, желающие развивать атомную энергетику, могли бы гарантированно получать топливо через непосредственное участие в работе этих центров, конечно же, под строгим контролем МГАТЭ. С российским предложением созвучны и последние инициативы президента Соединённых Штатов Америки Джорджа Буша. Считаю, что Россия и США объективно и в одинаковой степени заинтересованы в ужесточении режимов нераспространения оружия массового уничтожения и средств его доставки. Именно наши страны, являющиеся лидерами по ядерному и ракетному потенциалу, должны стать и лидерами в разработке новых, более жёстких мер в сфере нераспространения. Россия готова к такой работе, мы ведём консультации с нашими американскими друзьями. В целом речь должна идти о создании целой системы политических рычагов и экономических стимулов. Стимулов, при которых государства были бы заинтересованы не создавать собственные мощности ядерного топливного цикла, но имели бы возможность развивать атомную энергетику, укрепляя свой энергетический потенциал. В этой связи подробнее остановлюсь на международном энергетическом сотрудничестве. Г-жа Федеральный Канцлер тоже об этом коротко, но упомянула, затронула эту тему. В энергетической сфере Россия ориентируется на создание единых для всех рыночных принципов и прозрачных условий. Очевидно, что цена на энергоносители должна определяться рынком, а не являться предметом политических спекуляций, экономического давления или шантажа. Мы открыты для сотрудничества. Зарубежная компания участвует в наших крупнейших энергетических проектах. По различным оценкам, до 26 процентов добычи нефти в России вдумайтесь в эту цифру, до двадцати шести процентов добычи нефти в России приходится на иностранный капитал. Попробуйте привести мне пример подобного широкого присутствия российского бизнеса в ключевых отраслях экономики западных государств. Нет таких примеров, таких примеров нет. Напомню также о соотношении инвестиций, поступающих в Россию и идущих из России в другие страны мира. Соотношение примерно 15:1 вот вам зримый пример открытости и стабильности российской экономики. Экономическая безопасность это сфера, где всем следует придерживаться единых принципов. Мы готовы честно конкурировать. Для этого у российской экономики появляется всё больше возможностей. Такую динамику объективно оценивают эксперты и наши зарубежные партнёры. Так, недавно был повышен рейтинг России в УС, и с четвёртой группы риска наша страна перешла в третью. И хотел бы, пользуясь случаем, здесь, сегодня, в Мюнхене, поблагодарить наших немецких коллег за содействие в принятии вышеназванного решения. Далее, как вы знаете, процесс присоединения России к ВТО вышел на финальную стадию. Отмечу, что в ходе долгих, непростых переговоров слова о свободе, мы не раз слышали слова о свободе слова, о свободе от торговли, о равных возможностях, но почему-то исключительно применительно к нашему, к российскому рынку. Еще одна важная тема, прямо влияющая на глобальную безопасность. Сегодня много говорят о борьбе с бедностью. Что здесь происходит на самом деле? С одной стороны, на программы помощи беднейшим странам выделяются финансовые ресурсы и подчас не маленькие финансовые ресурсы, но по-честному, и здесь многие тоже это знают, зачастую под освоение компаниями самих же стран-доноров. Но в то же время, с другой стороны, в развитых странах сохраняются субсидии в сельском хозяйстве, ограничивается для других доступ к высоким технологиям. И давайте называть вещи своими именами. Получается, что одной рукой раздается благотворительная помощь, а другой не только консервируется экономическая отсталость, а еще и собирается прибыль. Возникающее социальное напряжение в таких депрессивных регионах неизбежно выливаются в рост радикализма, экстремизма, подпитывает терроризм и локальные конфликты. А если всё это вдобавок происходит, скажем, на Ближнем Востоке, в условиях обостренного восприятия внешнего мира как несправедливого, то возникает риск для глобальной дестабилизации. Очевидно, что ведущие страны мира должны видеть эту угрозу и, соответственно, выстраивать более демократическую, справедливую систему экономических отношений в мире, систему, дающую всем шанс и возможность для развития. Выступая на конференции, уважаемые дамы и господа, нельзя обойти молчанием и деятельность организации по безопасности и сотрудничеству в Европе. Как известно, она была создана, чтобы рассматривать все, я подчеркну это, все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскроили и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами и учредителями. Вскроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций. Формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСФ призвана оказывать сторонам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы её поддерживаем. Но вовсе это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинно демократических государств и, наоборот, делает их зависимыми и, как следствие, нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку. Вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. И, конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнёрами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех. Благодарю вас за внимание.
View Full Interactive Feed