TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 22, 2024 at 6:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I loved living in California, but getting things done here is incredibly difficult. Large projects often take at least two years to get approvals, and lawsuits are common. The state seems to need a crisis for any real deregulation or reduction in litigation. The Democratic Party is heavily influenced by unions and lawyers, who write legislation that favors lawsuits and large awards. This creates a cycle that stifles progress. For change to happen, there needs to be at least a small chance of a Republican being elected in California; otherwise, it feels like a one-party state.

@elon_docs - ELON DOCS

Elon Musk: California is de facto a one-party state where you can't get things done. "I loved living in California, but the problem is you cannot get things done. This is simply a description of fact. Ask anyone who's done a large project in California, how long would it take you to get the approval to proceed and pass CEQA in California for a large project? Two years, and you're doing well if you do it in two years. And you're going to get a ton of people who are going to sue you, just for the hell of it, basically. California's going to need a crisis to have deregulation and delitigation. The two entities that most control the Democratic Party are the unions and, secondarily, the plaintiff bar, basically, the lawyers that sue, especially class action. That's who controls the Democratic Party. Anyone who's familiar with the inside baseball of this will agree with me. This is, in fact, the case, especially in California. So, the issue is that the lawyers write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits in California because they funded the election of the officials. The people who got elected got funded by Democrats and lawyers. So, then they write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and get gigantic awards because they got the people elected. And you have this nightmarish circle. There has to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California. It has to be above 0%. Otherwise, you have a one-party state." Conversation with @teslaownersSV, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
California makes it difficult to complete large projects due to lengthy approval processes and frequent lawsuits. It can take two years to pass CEQA, and many people will sue. California needs a crisis to achieve deregulation and delitigation. Unions and plaintiff's lawyers control the Democratic party, especially in California. Lawyers write legislation to make lawsuits easy to win because they fund the elections of officials. This creates a cycle where elected officials favor those who helped them get elected. There needs to be above a 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California, otherwise it is a one-party state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I loved living in California, but the problem is you cannot get things done. This is simply a description of fact, and ask anyone and anyone who's stood done a large project in California, how long would it take you to get the approval to proceed and pass CEQA in California for a large project? Oh, 2 2 years, and you're doing well if you do it in 2 years. And and you're gonna get a ton of people is gonna sue you just just for the hell of it, basically. California's gonna need, like, a crisis to have, to have deregulation, and delitigation. The the two entities that most control the Democratic party are the unions, and secondarily the the the plaintiff's boss. Basically, the lawyers that that that sue. Mhmm. Especially class action. That's who controls the Democratic party. Anyone who's who's familiar with the inside baseball of this is will agree with me. This is in fact the case, especially in California. So the issue is that the the lawyers write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits in California, because they they they they funded the election of the officials, of of the the people that got elected got funded by Democrats and lawyers. So they then write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and and get gigantic awards, because they got the people elected. And you have this sort of circle of it was a nightmarish circle. Mhmm. Until there has to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California. It has to be above 0%. Otherwise, you have a one party state.
Saved - September 22, 2024 at 3:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel that the only thing preventing California's government and regulatory agencies from getting worse is the option for people and companies to leave the state. If the current administration wins the election, I worry the entire country will suffer. This is my first time being active in an election, as I believe America's future is at stake.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The only thing stopping the California government and overbearing regulatory agencies from being even worse is that people and companies can move out of state. If the machine behind the Kamala puppet wins this election, the whole country will be far worse than California is today. This is the first time I have been active in an election, because I believe the fate of America hangs in the balance.

@elon_docs - ELON DOCS

Elon Musk: California is de facto a one-party state where you can't get things done. "I loved living in California, but the problem is you cannot get things done. This is simply a description of fact. Ask anyone who's done a large project in California, how long would it take you to get the approval to proceed and pass CEQA in California for a large project? Two years, and you're doing well if you do it in two years. And you're going to get a ton of people who are going to sue you, just for the hell of it, basically. California's going to need a crisis to have deregulation and delitigation. The two entities that most control the Democratic Party are the unions and, secondarily, the plaintiff bar, basically, the lawyers that sue, especially class action. That's who controls the Democratic Party. Anyone who's familiar with the inside baseball of this will agree with me. This is, in fact, the case, especially in California. So, the issue is that the lawyers write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits in California because they funded the election of the officials. The people who got elected got funded by Democrats and lawyers. So, then they write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and get gigantic awards because they got the people elected. And you have this nightmarish circle. There has to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California. It has to be above 0%. Otherwise, you have a one-party state." Conversation with @teslaownersSV, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
California makes it difficult to complete large projects due to lengthy approval processes and frequent lawsuits. It can take at least two years to pass CEQA, and many people will sue. The Democratic party is controlled by unions and plaintiff's lawyers, especially those involved in class action suits. These lawyers write legislation that favors winning lawsuits in California because they fund the elections of the officials who get elected. This creates a cycle where elected officials write legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and get large awards, because they were funded by Democrats and lawyers. The speaker believes there needs to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California to avoid a one-party state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I loved living in California, but the problem is you cannot get things done. This is simply a description of fact, and ask anyone and anyone who's stood done a large project in California, how long would it take you to get the approval to proceed and pass CEQA in California for a large project? Oh, 2 2 years, and you're doing well if you do it in 2 years. And and you're gonna get a ton of people is gonna sue you just just for the hell of it, basically. California's gonna need, like, a crisis to have, to have deregulation, and delitigation. The the two entities that most control the Democratic party are the unions, and secondarily the the the plaintiff's boss. Basically, the lawyers that that that sue. Mhmm. Especially class action. That's who controls the Democratic party. Anyone who's who's familiar with the inside baseball of this is will agree with me. This is in fact the case, especially in California. So the issue is that the the lawyers write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits in California, because they they they they funded the election of the officials, of of the the people that got elected got funded by Democrats and lawyers. So they then write the legislation to make it easy to win lawsuits and and get gigantic awards, because they got the people elected. And you have this sort of circle of it was a nightmarish circle. Mhmm. Until there has to be an above 0% chance of a Republican getting elected in California. It has to be above 0%. Otherwise, you have a one party state.
Saved - October 18, 2024 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
At a town hall in Pennsylvania, I delivered a passionate speech emphasizing the importance of free speech, the Constitution, and sensible spending. I responded to a supporter’s comment about George Soros, calling him misanthropic and harmful to society. I discussed the Second Amendment's role in protecting freedoms and expressed concerns about election integrity, particularly with Dominion voting machines. I also suggested that there may be multiple puppet masters behind the current administration. The event ended on a heartwarming note when I took a moment to connect with a young fan.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk Drops Unforgettable Take on Who’s Running the Shadow Government Here’s what he said at today’s town hall. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/dOfl87xHFV

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk fired up a packed crowd at Ridley High School in Pennsylvania today, delivering an unforgettable 55-minute speech. Right out of the gate, the world’s richest man got the crowd cheering when he said, “The hell with” anyone who opposes free speech, the Constitution, secure borders, and sensible spending. “I've been told at times that these are, like, right-wing values. I'm like, ‘Are you insane?’ These are literally the fundamental values that made America what it is today. And anyone who's against those things is fundamentally anti-American. And the hell with them!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that "common sense" values include secure borders, safe cities, sensible spending to avoid inflation, freedom of speech, and upholding the Constitution. The speaker is surprised that these values are sometimes labeled as "right-wing values," asserting that they are the fundamental values that made America what it is today. Anyone against these values is considered fundamentally anti-American.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I I think the things we we we all want are simple sense sensible I mean, common sense things. Yeah. We we obviously want we want secure borders. We want safe cities. You know, sensible spending, so that we don't have crazy inflation. We want freedom of speech. We want the constitution to be to be upheld. And and, you know you know what? I'm I'm being told at times that these are, like, the right wing values. I'm like, you are you insane? This is literally the fundamental values that made America what it is today. And anyone who is against those things is fundamentally anti American, and the hell with them.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It didn’t take long before a Trump supporter shouted to Musk that George Soros is “evil”—to which Musk responded with a clear “Yeah.” He said Soros is “honestly misanthropic” and that “for someone who sort of claims to be doing good, but actually he is not. He is tearing down the fabric of society.¨

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions how the U.S. can be the most powerful country when it's not safe to walk around its cities. They mention North Korea and then accuse George Soros of tearing down the fabric of society, describing him as misanthropic and not actually doing good despite claims to the contrary. The speaker reiterates that people should feel safe walking around American cities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How can we be, you know, the most powerful country in the world? And and it's and you're not it's it's not safe to walk around our cities. What the hell is going on? North Korea. Yeah. I mean, Soros, honestly, misanthropic. You know, it's it's for someone who has, you know, sort sort of claims to be doing good, but actually, he is not. You know? He he is tearing down the fabric of society. So terrible. Yeah. So but I think it's it's it's it's just unbelievable that we that like, you should be able to feel safe walking around American cities.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk continued to drop 90 seconds of pure facts. He said the Second Amendment is there to protect the First and warns that once you disarm a population, the country is doomed to become Venezuela. Musk then called out Maduro, saying that he lost in a landslide but rigged the election. And the only reason Maduro was able to hold onto power is because the disarmed citizens can’t fight back. “So now you're facing soldiers with assault rifles. Are you going to throw some sticks at them or something? Use finger guns? It doesn't work. So Maduro, even though he lost the election, is still in power. And that's the kind of risk that we face,” Musk said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The First Amendment exists because in other countries, people were imprisoned or killed for speaking their minds. The Second Amendment is there to protect the First Amendment. If the government disarms the people, they can do anything they want. In Venezuela, Chavez took away everyone's guns, then Maduro lost an election but stayed in power. People protested, but they were facing soldiers with assault rifles. Maduro is still in power because the people were disarmed. This is the kind of risk we face.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the reason they have the First Amendment was because, you know, the countries people came from, if you spoke your mind, you'd be imprisoned or killed. That's why you have it. That's really important. And and then the right to bear arms is also really important. That's there to protect you know? I the the second amendment is there to protect the first amendment. As as soon as the government can disarm the people, they can do anything they want. And you see you've we've seen this in one country after another. They take the guns away from the people, then they then they do fake elections, and then the people try to protest and they just get shot. That's what happened in in Venezuela recently. They had a they had a fake election. Maduro lost, like, massively lost, like, you know, 70% loss. And he's like, oh, no. I won. And everyone's like, oh, you don't win. There were big protests in the street. But the thing is that Chavez, when he when he came into power, took away everyone's guns. So now you're facing, you know, soldiers with assault rifles. When you're gonna throw some sticks at them or something, use finger guns, it doesn't work. So Maduro, even though he lost the election, is still in power. And that's the that's the kind of risk risk that we face.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Switching focus, Musk revealed to the town hall attendees why he was even there in the first place. “I haven't been politically active before. I'm politically active now because I think the future of America and the future of civilization is at stake.” The crowd responded with a thunderous round of applause.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are politically active now because they believe the future of America and civilization is at stake. They indicate they were not politically active before.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I haven't been politically active before. I'm I'm politically active now because I think, the future of America and the future of civilization is at stake. So yeah.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one. https://t.co/aFlP6dBwIT

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the local residents from the area got amped up when he welcomed Elon Musk to Ridley High School, made him an honorary “Raider,” and handed him a football jersey. Musk handled the situation with pure grace. The local asked Musk what he could do to get Donald Trump across the finish line, and Musk answered, “Registration, registration, registration, registration, every single day,” reminding everyone that there are only three days left to do so in Pennsylvania. “If there's ever a weekend to spend going hog wild on registration, this is it.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk was welcomed to Ridley Township, Delaware County, and made an honorary Ridley Raider. He stated that for the next 3 days, everyone needs to focus on registering friends, family, and acquaintances. Anyone not registered by Monday evening, or registered incorrectly, won't be able to vote. Musk emphasized that this election could be decided by a handful of people and that extra effort on voter registration could decide the entire future of civilization. He urged everyone to spend the weekend registering voters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon, first of all, welcome to Ridley Township Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: Delaware County, and welcome to Ridley School District and their beautiful high school. Yeah. Because you made this your first stop, we'd love to make you an honorary Ridley Raider. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: I'd like to give you the shirt, football jersey. Sports is big in Ridley, big in Delaware County. This is must 67 counties in Pennsylvania. We gotta turn every one of them red. Great. Speaker 1: Not good. Thank you. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: First first question is, what can all of us hear, everybody in this auditorium, everybody watching the live stream, what do we do now to make sure we get Donald Trump across the finish line in Pennsylvania and everywhere else in this country? Speaker 1: Yeah. That's it's it's fundamentally for the next 3 days, just everyone needs to focus on on registering, friends, family, acquaintances, everyone you know. If because if you're not registered by Monday that's why I'm being I'm being sort of repetitive about this and really emphasizing this. Anyone not registered, by Monday evening or if they're registered incorrectly, their vote won't count. They won't be able to vote. So we got 3 days. It's all about registration, registration, registration, registration every single day. And like I said, this election could be decided by a handful of people. It could just be that a a little bit of extra effort on on voter registration, decides the entire future of civilization. So that's why I'm saying, man, this is if there's ever a weekend to spend going hog wild on registration, this is it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One local resident brought up her concerns about election fraud, and Musk expressed that he could also smell something fishy with Dominion voting machines. In fact, Musk found it to be a “heck of a coincidence” that Philadelphia and Maricopa County use Dominion voting machines but “not in a lot of other places,” saying that the last thing he would want to do is trust a computer program “because it's just too easy to hack.” “I know a lot about computers, and I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line, and it's really difficult to hack paper ballots. “So in-person voting with proof of ID, which, by the way, every country has. Almost every country that has democratic elections requires in-person voting with voter ID. “This is weird. It's super weird to not have that. I think that's the only way to effectively address fraud, given that we are where we are today. “I think we just need a very big margin of victory. If the margin of victory is big enough, then as I say, it's got to beat the cheat,” Musk said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes some amount of cheating takes place in elections, particularly with mail-in ballots and lack of proof of citizenship, making it hard to prove. Statistically unlikely events occurred, such as the use of Dominion Voting Machines in specific locations like Philadelphia and Maricopa County. The speaker advocates for paper ballots, hand-counted, citing the ease of hacking computer programs. They also support in-person voting with voter ID, which they claim is standard in almost every country with democratic elections. To effectively address fraud, the speaker suggests in-person voting with ID. Given the current situation, they believe a very large margin of victory is needed to overcome potential cheating.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I used to be really, really active in promoting, you know, Trump campaign 4 years ago, and I got burned out. And I'm so frustrated. And and and it's all because of the cheating. So what are we going to do with that? Speaker 1: Well, the the there is, I think, some amount of cheating that takes place. It's it's hard be because they've you know, when you when you have mail in ballots and, no no sort of proof of citizenship, it becomes almost impossible to prove cheating is the issue. So a lot of pea you know, a lot of people on their side will say there's no cheating. There's no cheating. And I'm like, you you've made it impossible to actually prove that that that there's cheating. But the statistically, there are some very strange things that happened that's, that that are statistically incredibly unlikely. So, you know, there's always this question of, like, say, the Dominion Voting Machines. It it is weird that the you know, I I think they're used in Philadelphia and in Maricopa County, but not in a lot of other places. And that seemed like a heck of a coincidence. So so I think there's a that is, you know I I wish my view, we should only do, paper ballots hand counted. That's it. I mean, I'm I'm a I'm a technologist. I know a lot about computers. And I'm like, the last thing I would do is trust a computer program, because it's just too easy to hack. It's too easy to add just one line, and it's really difficult to hack paper ballots. So, you know, in in person voting with with, you know, proof of yeah. With with ID, which by the way, every country has I mean, like, almost every country that that has democratic elections requires in person, voting with voter ID. This is weird. It's it's super weird to not have that. I think that's the only way to effectively, address fraud. You know, given that we are where we are today, I think we just need a very big margin of victory. You know, there's there's yeah. If the margin of victory is big enough, then it you know, as I say, it's gotta beat the cheap.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk got into seriously risky territory of upsetting the establishment when he challenged government spending and reminded politicians that the tax dollars they spend belong to the American people. “For some weird reason, a lot of people in the state, the politicians, they seem to forget that the money being spent is your money. And if it's not being spent in a way that is beneficial to the American people, it's a misuse of the funds,” Musk argued.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks Elon if he would consider stopping financial aid to countries like Israel and Ukraine, and ending funding for "forever wars" that supposedly benefit the "deep state." Elon responds that government waste is staggering. He states that any expenditure should benefit American citizens, because the money being spent is the public's money. He adds that politicians often forget this, and that spending should be beneficial to the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon, first off, you're my hero, and I love your sneakers. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: So if you do choose to be the, head of the Department of Government Efficiency Yeah. Speaker 1: I do. Yep. Speaker 0: What do you think about we stopped giving money to other countries such as Israel, Ukraine, and we stopped funding forever wars that most likely is going to the deep state anyway. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I I I think in in general, the the the amount of waste that happens with the with the federal government is is really staggering. It's a staggering amount of waste of taxpayer money. And if if we're you know, for any given expenditure, we have to say, well, what does this do for the citizens of America? Like, how is this good for the people of America? That's it's their money. Like, for some weird reason, a lot of, you know, a lot of people in, the sort of, you know, state or whatever, the politicians, they they they seem to forget that the money being spent is is your money. And and if it's not spending being spent in a way that is beneficial to the American people, it's a misuse of the funds.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The bombshell of the night dropped when a voter asked Elon Musk, “Do you think there is a shadow government behind the Biden-Harris administration?” Musk replied with an awesome answer. First off, he said, “It's not Biden. We know that for a fact. The dude has barely got two functional neurons.” What about Kamala? Elon answered that it's not her either. “They just replaced the Biden puppet with the Kamala puppet, very obviously. If the teleprompter stops working, then the puppet breaks, and it's like, ‘Oh, the puppet just starts looping because the teleprompter broke.’” So who is it? Musk said that he believes “There isn't any one sort of puppet master but maybe a thousand or “a lot.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is obvious that Biden is not in charge, as he seems to be at the beach a lot. When his poll numbers went low, he said he was staying in the race, but the real power told him he was not. It's not just Obama behind him. There isn't one puppet master, but more like a thousand. It's obvious that Biden is not in charge, and Kamala isn't either. They just replaced the Biden puppet with the Kamala puppet. When the teleprompter stops working, the puppet breaks and starts looping.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My question is, do you think there is a shadow government behind the Biden Harris administration? Speaker 1: I I mean, it's let well, let me put it this way. It's not Biden. We know that for a fact. Okay. I the the the dude's, like, barely got 2 functional neurons. So, you know, it's it's like and he just seems to be at the beach a lot, and he's obviously not in charge. So, I I mean, when the poll started going low on Biden, he he, you know, he he he was saying, oh, he's staying in the race. He's staying in the race, but then I guess the real power is that he told him he's not. You know? Turn that. Speaker 0: Like So so who is it that's behind him? We know Obama. Okay? But Obama Speaker 1: Oh, the Trump Trump. I mean, I I'm just as curious as you are. Why not? You know, it it is it is, as far as I can determine, there isn't any one sort of puppet master. It it's more like there's a 1,000 or, I don't know, a lot. Certainly. But, I mean, I'd like to talk to them to understand more about listen, what are your goals, puppet masters? I'm just curious. I mean, maybe. I agree with some of them. It's possible. But but but it's just obvious that that Biden is on a charge. It's obvious that Kamala is on a charge. I mean, the the Kamala is they just replaced the the Biden puppet with the Kamala puppet, very obviously. And so you can tell, like, if the teleprompter stops working, then the puppet stopped breaks. And it's like, oop. The the puppet just starts looping because the teleprompter broke. I don't have a teleprompter. I just talk like a normal human.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

During his interview with Tucker Carlson, Musk said that there is a very high chance that Kamala's top puppet masters happen to also be on the Epstein client list. He explained that's why they're so terrified of a Trump victory because if Trump wins the election, the Epstein client list is coming out.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes Kamala Harris is like a marionette controlled by over 100 "puppet masters," many of whom the speaker claims to know. The speaker would like to see a matchup of the top 100 puppet masters and the Epstein client list, believing there would be strong overlap. The speaker finds it mind-blowing that no one on the Epstein client list has been prosecuted, while many January 6th protesters have been imprisoned. The speaker thinks part of the reason Kamala Harris is getting so much support is that some billionaires are terrified that the Epstein client list will become public if Trump wins. The speaker believes people like Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates are nervous about this possibility. The speaker notes that Reid Hoffman was his vice president of business development at PayPal 24 years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But you'll just say whatever words are on the teleprompter. So, you know, it's it's really whoever controls the teleprompter. It's the actual sort of those those who's actually in charge. Speaker 1: And who is that, Speaker 0: do you think? Well, I've I've tried to put it down. It's it's not like any one kind of mastermind. It's not like it seems to be it's it's like, Kamala is sort of a a marionette with, you know, a thousand puppet masters type of thing. Like, not it's or maybe it's somewhere north of a 100, is what it seems Speaker 1: like. Yes. I bet you know 80 of them. Speaker 0: I probably know most of them. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: So what I mean, just by virtue of your job and what you've been doing for the last 30 years, I mean, you Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And I should say, I think you voted Speaker 0: for I I I'd I'd like to see a matchup of of of those we quote the the the top 100 puppet masters in the FD and client list. Speaker 1: Do you think there's some overlap? Speaker 0: Overlap. Strong overlap. Speaker 1: When are we going to see that list, do you think? Speaker 0: I don't know. It's it's it's it's mind blowing that that it, that they've not tried to prosecute even one. Not even the worst offender on on the Epstein client list, they have not even tried to prosecute even 1. Is that that's insane. Speaker 1: Well, because they have a lot of diabetic grandmothers who were outside the Capitol on January 6th. They've they're kind of occupied. Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, they've put, like, whatever, 5 or 600 January 6th protesters in prison and not one person on the on the Epstein client list. Speaker 1: Will that ever come out, do you think? Speaker 0: Know, I I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that, if if Trump wins, that FCN client list is gonna become public. Yes. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome. Yeah. Speaker 1: Do you think Reid Hoffman's uncomfortable? Yes. Speaker 0: Yeah. And Gates. And Gates. Yeah. Speaker 1: And I only ask that because you can certainly just look at them and you're like, that that's a nervous person right there. I don't know. I mean, I assume you know them. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yes. Reid Hoffman was my vice president of business development at PayPal Yeah. 24 years ago.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk believes in this crossover relationship so strongly that he said it again during today’s speech. “[It'll] be interesting to see the crossover between the Epstein client list and Kamala's puppet masters. I bet there's a lot of names that appear in both lists.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests a crossover exists between Jeffrey Epstein's client list and those controlling Kamala Harris, implying shared names on both lists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Interesting to see the crossover between the Epstein client list and Kamala's puppet masters. I bet there's a lot of names that appear in both lists.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The town hall ended in the most heartwarming way possible when Elon Musk dedicated some of his time to a young fan. In the middle of a serious question, a young child interrupted him, and instead of getting frustrated, Elon signed his hat and snapped a picture with him. This act was so classy that popular X video clipper @mazemoore said, “Thank God for that man. This election would already be over if not for him buying this site [X] and deciding to support Trump.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if someone has a pen and if they can explain something quickly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Can you can you explain real quick why? Should you have a pen? I don't know if does somebody have a pen or something?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading! If you found this post helpful, please do me a favor and follow this page before you go. And in case you missed it, here’s my breakdown of Kamala’s train-wreck interview with Fox News. https://t.co/j1uOrfMwNp

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Kamala Harris Falls Apart in Train-Wreck Fox News Interview Kamala thought she was ready for Bret Baier—she was wrong. Two moments in particular were especially humiliating. Here’s how it all went down. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/NssTE9FF5p

Saved - November 1, 2024 at 8:18 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

A lot of people still don’t believe me when I say that the Dems will do everything in their power to destroy me if they win on Nov 5th

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

BREAKING: Legacy media has launched new propaganda against Elon Musk. Elon Musk was legally permitted to work in the United States. He held a J-1 visa, which later transitioned to an H-1B. https://t.co/9BxXdBGYkQ

Saved - November 5, 2024 at 2:33 AM

@america - America

ELON MUSK: “Go out there and vote... for Peanut… How can it be that we live in America, supposedly land of the free and the government can barge into your home with guns?” https://t.co/1b8mT2pJhY

Video Transcript AI Summary
If someone killed your pet, you'd want revenge too. The situation with the squirrel is outrageous. In America, the government can invade your home, take your pets, and even kill them. If they can do that to animals, what could they do to people? The squirrel had a loving bond with its owner, and it was clearly a pet. It's legal to have exotic pets in Texas, so why kill the squirrel? Some people even celebrated its death, which is absurd. Most compassionate people find this terrible. We need to stand up for our rights and vote for change, even if it’s just for the sake of a beloved pet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If somebody killed your dog, you'd be really inclined to kill them too. Yeah. Somebody killed your squirrel. Speaker 1: Yeah. John John Wick. Speaker 0: Yeah. The fucking squirrel thing is bananas. Speaker 1: Yeah. That squirrel thing in the world? Thing? I I so here's the thing about the the the whole squirrel thing is is that, how Speaker 0: can it Speaker 1: be that we live in America, supposedly land of the free, and the, you know, the government can barge into your home with guns? So if you resist, you're gonna get shot. And then take your your pets and execute them. And if they can do that to your pets, what do you think they can do to you? Speaker 0: I know that it's not an exaggeration. Absolutely. It sounds like you're you're all that's so crazy. How can you make that connection? But it's that's Speaker 1: No. It's Why Speaker 0: would you kill that cute little squirrel that was obviously a pet and trained from the time it was a baby? Yeah. If you see the interaction that guy has with that squirrel, it was wonderful. Speaker 1: It was really cute. Yes. Absolutely. The the there's it it was just obviously it was a blood pet pet squirrel, and raccoon too, and doing no harm, and the the the government comes in, barges into the guy's house, takes his pets, and kills them. And, you know, I I think this should this should really get people out there mobilized, frankly, because, you know, everything you say that, like, the John Wick movie where John Wick's, like, you know, he he he wants to he just wants peace, like, you know, in in the in the John Wick movie. He just wants to see he's like, listen. I wanna retire. And they offer him, like, tons of money, like, to because they wanted to be an assassin, to keep being an assassin. They're like, they they like they they like offering tons of money. They're threatening. He's like, listen. I'm not gonna be I'm I'm I'm out. You know? And they kill his dog. That was a bad idea. That was a really Speaker 0: cute little puppy, and the puppy was his, ex wife's gift to him when she died of cancer. Yeah. Great movie. Speaker 1: Great movie. Speaker 0: Best revenge movie Speaker 1: of all time Speaker 0: because it's so ridiculous. He kills everybody. Speaker 1: Yeah. He kills everyone. Speaker 0: And you're rooting for him. Speaker 1: Yeah. They shouldn't have killed his dog. Speaker 0: Yeah. They fucked up, and they shouldn't have killed that squirrel. Speaker 1: They shouldn't have killed that fucking that squirrel I mean, it's like how many how many cases have we not heard about? You know? Aw. Look at Speaker 0: that little guy. That squirrel clearly had a love relationship with that guy. He would hop all over him and climb on him. I mean, it was that was his pet. That squirrel thought of that man as his protector, as his his companion. Yeah. There was nothing wrong with that. And in Texas, it's totally legal. You can have a fucking zebra out here. You can have whatever you want. And that's the argument for freedom. What the fuck is wrong with you? Why are you killing that squirrel? It doesn't make any sense. Speaker 1: Yeah. And then to add insult to injury, there were a bunch of people on the left who were, like, actually posting that they're glad that's MAGA squirrel got killed, which is fucking Speaker 0: MAGA squirrel. Yeah. Like the fucking squirrel has an ideology. It's a cute little fluffy squirrel. Speaker 1: Exactly. Speaker 0: Well, it's it's a nice symbol because most lot most, like, reasonable compassionate people think that's terrible. And most people who have Yeah. Exactly. Think it's terrible. Terrible. Speaker 1: So I don't know. I mean, I'm like, I hope people just go out there and vote for peanut, man. If nothing else if nothing else, just vote for peanut, you know?
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it interesting that Democrats argue Elon Musk's support for Donald Trump gave him an unfair advantage. Meanwhile, Kamala Harris had the backing of a vast array of influential figures and organizations, including major tech companies, numerous media outlets, and a long list of celebrities. It seems there's a significant disparity in the level of support each candidate received, raising questions about what constitutes an "unfair advantage" in politics.

@Plandemic3Movie - PLANDEMIC

Democrats are claiming that Elon Musk’s support of Donald Trump gave him an unfair advantage, when Kamala Harris only had the support of: Google, YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, Snapchat, The New York Times, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Hill, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS News, ABC News, PBS NewsHour, BBC News, CNBC, NPR, The View, Beyoncé, Jennifer Lopez, Taylor Swift, Ariana Grande, Lady Gaga, Megan Thee Stallion, Cardi B, Eminem, Billie Eilish, Demi Lovato, Katy Perry, Stevie Wonder, James Taylor, John Legend, Neil Young, Stevie Nicks, Usher, Magic Johnson, Willie Nelson Common, Bruce Springsteen, Lizzo, Rihanna, Samuel L. Jackson, Tyler Perry, Kerry Washington, Angela Bassett, Alyssa Milano, Jennifer Aniston, Howard Stern, Julia Roberts, Harrison Ford, George Clooney, Tony Goldwyn, Eva Longoria, Jamie Lee Curtis, Wanda Sykes, Barbra Streisand, Cher, Drew Barrymore, Oprah Winfrey, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Will Farrell, Jeff Bridges, Chris Rock, Leonardo DiCaprio, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Michelle Obama, Barack Obama, and the list goes on…

Saved - November 16, 2024 at 10:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found myself agreeing with Elon Musk's view that a Democratic victory in 2024 could lead to a one-party state. Initially, I resisted this idea, but I realized it stemmed from a psychological reluctance to accept such a possibility. If Trump, despite his strengths, can't win against the political machine, then it seems that machine will always prevail. This raises concerns about the erosion of democracy, especially considering the non-democratic nature of the 2020 Democratic primaries, which could result in an even stronger, unchallengeable power structure.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Peter Thiel reluctantly agreed with Elon Musk's belief that if the Democratic Party won the 2024 election, it could consolidate power into a one-party state. "I didn't want to believe Elon when he said this, so I texted him and told him I hadn't believed you when you said this at first. But I think this is because, psychologically, I don't want to believe that." "The sense in which I felt that he was correct was if Trump, with much better substance and much better on so many things, could not win in 2024 against the machine, then the machine would always win." "And if the machine always wins, then you no longer have a democracy. You certainly no longer have a democratic process within the Democratic Party. We can always debate the election shenanigans in November 2020." "The far more extraordinary thing was in March of 2020 when Biden came in fourth or fifth in Iowa and New Hampshire and then somehow got rammed through South Carolina. All the other candidates drop out." "So, this extremely non-democratic primary in the Democratic Party in 2020 led to an even less democratic process in which Biden was replaced with Harris." "If the machine could defeat Trump, I thought it was reasonable that it would gain even more power and somehow be unbeatable, and the country would become like California, a one-party state." @elonmusk @peterthiel

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon provided a sense of courage to others, despite the risks he faced if Trump lost. Before the election, both Oprah and Elon suggested that a loss could mean the end of American elections, which seemed extreme. Initially skeptical, I later realized that if Trump, despite his strengths, couldn't win against the political establishment, democracy would be at risk. The Democratic primary process in 2020 felt undemocratic, with Biden's rise after poor showings in early states. If the establishment could defeat Trump, it might gain even more power, leading to a one-party state, making it harder for citizens to leave the U.S. compared to leaving California.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, Elon gave, gave people a great deal of cover. You know? It certainly seemed incredibly dangerous to me what he did, incredibly courageous, you know, what would have happened to him if, if if Trump would have lost. And then, and then and then certainly, it it was well, you know, maybe all all of the rest of us can be a little bit more courageous than we otherwise were going to be. But he he gave cover to everybody. Speaker 1: One of the things that was being said on both sides before the election by Oprah and Elon, and they sounded different saying it, but it was the same message, was that if their candidate didn't win, this was gonna be the last American election. I thought that was totally nuts, but maybe you don't. Or maybe you hear it differently. Speaker 0: Let me I I didn't want to believe Elon when he said this. And I, you know, I I texted him a few weeks before the election and told him, you know, I hadn't believed you when you said this at first. But it's but I I think it's because psychologically, I don't want to believe that. I don't want to believe that the country is so far gone that you have to leave the country or something. And, but then it was the sense in Speaker 1: which I felt that he was correct was that if, if Trump with what Speaker 0: I think much better substance, much better on so many things, could not win in 2024 against the machine. The machine would always win. And if the machine always wins, you no longer have a democracy You know, you certainly no longer have a democratic process within the Democratic Party. You know, we always debate the election shenanigans in November of 2020. The far more extraordinary thing was March of 2020 where Biden comes in 4th place, 5th place in Iowa, New Hampshire and then somehow gets rammed through South Carolina. All the other candidates drop off. So it's an extremely nondemocratic primary in the Democratic party in 2020, and then an even less Democratic process by which Biden was replaced with Harris. And, and, yeah, it was going to be this, and if if the machine could, could defeat Trump, I I thought it was reasonable that it would gain even more power and somehow be unbeatable and the country would become California, become a one party state. And it would be far worse than California because the constraint on California is people can leave California. It's much harder to leave the US.
Saved - December 6, 2024 at 3:40 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This needs to be fixed. Should be rule by democracy, not rule by bureaucracy!

@BasedMikeLee - Mike Lee

🧵1. In a meeting today with @elonmusk, @vivekgramaswamy, & @speakerjohnson, Elon & Vivek referred to the fact that, because unelected bureaucrats now make most federal law & control much of our economy, we’ve been stripped of the benefits of a constitutional republic. https://t.co/8Zo3DoilrB

Saved - December 22, 2024 at 9:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the Democratic narrative about Elon Musk's influence in politics by pointing out that unelected individuals have been shaping government decisions for years. I encouraged critics to read the Wall Street Journal to see this reality. Additionally, I highlighted the hypocrisy in their concerns about billionaire influence, specifically calling out George Soros for his extensive connections with Democratic politicians, likening it to a child collecting Pokemon cards.

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

🔥@ScottJenningsKY just nuked Democrat narrative about Elon having too much influence over US politics: "I hear Democrats criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence over the government. I invite them to pick up the Wall Street Journal from this week and find out that unelected people have been running the government for the last four years." "I hear Democrats criticizing criticizing the influence of billionaires on our politics. When you've got this Soros punk running around collecting Democrat politicians like my kids collect Pokemon cards." 🔥🔥🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are questions about whether Donald Trump's relationship with Elon Musk will fade, but it seems strong. Musk played a key role in Trump's success. Critics, particularly from the left, often complain about the influence of unelected individuals in government, yet they overlook that this has been happening for years. They also criticize billionaire influence in politics while ignoring figures like George Soros, who actively supports Democratic politicians. The left's criticism of Musk appears hypocritical and excessive. Musk is contributing to transparency in the federal government, which is a positive development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is this gonna wear thin with Donald Trump soon? I don't think so. I mean, look. They they appear to be getting along well. Musk was very instrumental in his victory. And I hear Democrats, you know, criticizing the idea that we have unelected people with too much influence over the government. I invite them to pick up The Wall Street Journal from this week and find out that unelected people have been running the government for the last 4 years. I hear Democrats criticizing the influence of billionaires on our politics when you've got this Soros punk running around collecting democrat politicians like my kids collect Pokemon cards. So I I think all the criticism of Musk coming from the left is totally hypocritical, totally over the top, and he is doing something interesting, bringing some transparency, to the federal government. It's not a terrible thing. But it's
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 4:41 AM

@JDVance - JD Vance

Memo to the press: When a president is elected by the People and then does what he promised to do, that’s democracy. When a president is thwarted by unelected bureaucrats, that’s oligarchy. President Trump refuses to bend the knee to that oligarchy. Buckle up!

Saved - February 3, 2025 at 9:26 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The corrupt politicians “protesting” outside the USAID building are the ones getting money from USAID. That’s why they’re there – they want your stolen tax dollars!

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

BREAKING: Rep. Jamie Raskin blasts Elon Musk outside USAID HQ, declaring that Democrats will block DOGE from eliminating government waste and fraud. "Elon Musk, you didn't create USAID." "He doesn't have the power to destroy it, and who will stop him? We are!" "We don't have a fourth branch of government called Elon Musk." Meanwhile, the U.S. is $37 trillion in debt—and Americans elected President Trump, who promised to empower Elon Musk and DOGE to cut wasteful spending.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk did not create USAID; that was established by the United States Congress for the American people. He also does not have the authority to dismantle it. We will prevent him from doing so. Although Musk may have gained control over certain financial systems, he does not control the money of the American people—that power lies with Congress under Article 1 of the Constitution. Just as the elected president cannot withhold public funds, there is no separate branch of government led by Elon Musk, and this distinction will become increasingly clear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon Musk, you didn't create USAID. The United States Congress did for the American people. Right. And just like Elon Musk did not create USAID, he doesn't have the power to destroy it. And who's gonna stop him? We are. We're gonna stop him. Elon Musk, you may have illegally seized power over the financial payment systems of the United States Department of Treasury, but you don't control the money of the American people. The United States Congress does that under article 1 of the constitution. And just like the president who is elected to something cannot impound the money of the people, we don't have a 4th branch of government called Elon Musk, and that's gonna become real clear.
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 1:20 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

"Nobody elected your ass! This is not Elon Musk's country!" - Rep Maxine Waters goes on an unhinged rant attacking Elon Musk at the anti-Elon rally. All this drama because Americans simply asked what our tax dollars are funding. https://t.co/tNRwfAKNPi

Video Transcript AI Summary
California, we need to address Elon Musk. Nobody elected him to control our private information or payments. He's profited enough from our government and now wants to dictate how we manage our finances. We must protect our federal employees and assert that this is our country, not Musk's or Trump's. The billionaire class is trying to dominate and profit at our expense, but we will not allow it. They are creating cryptocurrency to enrich themselves, not to benefit the people. We must stand firm, regardless of the weather, and demand decent jobs and respect. Musk won't even meet with local officials, showing his disregard for the community. We cannot be intimidated; when the people fight, we win. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California. Hello, everybody. We have convened here in the right place, the Treasury Department. We have got to tell Elon Musk nobody elected your ass. Nobody told you you could get all of our private information. Nobody told you you could be in charge of the payments of this country. We have told you you've made enough money off our government yourself. And now you wanna take everybody else's payroll and make sure that they don't make the kind of money that you have made. Oh, you wanna use our money to go to Mars? No. We wanna use our money right here in Washington, DC, in this country. We wanna make sure that all of our federal employees are protected. We've got to make sure that you know and understand nobody elected you. You think you're the pro president of The United States Of America, the co president that can take over, go into our private payment system, and do whatever you wanna do. You got another thought coming. We're gonna stop you right now. Ladies and gentlemen, we're at a crisis in this country. We're having in a crisis in this country because Trump and Elon Musk and the billionaires have decided they're gonna put us all in our place. They're gonna run this country. They're gonna make sure that they take over everything. Are we gonna let them do that? Are we gonna let them run this government in the way that they can make even more money? And so they won't stop. It is so brazen. Every day, they're taking new actions. They're taking executive actions. Every day, they're doing something. Do you know that Trump and the billionaire class have created more cryptocurrency? Do you know that that cryptocurrency is not a donation? It's not an investment. It's going into their pockets. Do you understand that the moneymakers are in charge, they think. But when the people decide that we're not going to be trumped on, that we're not gonna be walked on, that we're not gonna be stomped on, that we're not gonna allow them to control our lives and push us out that when they understand that, we will win. That's it. That's it. We've got to be prepared to be out here no matter how cold it is, no matter if it's the rain, no matter if it's snowing, we've got to be here. This is our country. This is not Elon Musk's country. This is not Trump's country. This is our country. We deserve to have decent jobs. We deserve to have the respect. We deserve to be treated in a way that all Americans should be treated. And so let me just tell you now. I have Elon Musk's major office in my district. He won't even meet with the local elected officials. He said he was gonna tunnel under from his office all the way to the airport so he didn't have to be among, the need for people on the ground to get to the airport. He is a low down dirty, no good person along with Trump that cannot be trusted, and we must not be afraid of them again. When the people fight We win. When the people fight We win. When the people say that you'd better see us because we damn sure see you. Thank you very much. Go ahead. Thank you. Thank you.
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 1:55 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

I mean, in fairness, you could probably apply that same “nobody elected _______” logic to all but ~3-4 of the Jews LARP’ing in America’s current Government.

@BehizyTweets - George

Angry Catlady Elizabeth Warren just took the mic at the "Nobody Elected Elon" rally and immediately started lying. "Elon Musk is seizing power from the American people. WE ARE HERE TO FIGHT BACK." https://t.co/rMM4ePUXCc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk is taking control in a way that undermines the American people, and we are here to resist this move.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the building behind me, Elon Musk is seizing power from the American people. We are here to fight back.
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 5:02 PM

@DonaldJTrumpJr - Donald Trump Jr.

“I didn’t vote for Elon Musk”🥴 Well cry harder libs. We didn’t vote for this clown either, yet he controls the democrat party. The difference is Trump ran & was elected in a landslide with full transparency that Elon would be doing exactly what he’s doing. See the difference? https://t.co/wg5fQhjaFP

Saved - February 5, 2025 at 4:46 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This is a great line: “Yeah well I didn’t vote for Joe Biden’s non-binary Deep State theater kids to get a blank check to give my tax dollars to fringe left-wing NGO slush funds for four years, but that’s exactly what happened.” 🤣💯

@RobertMSterling - Robert Sterling

“I didn’t vote for Elon Musk and his autistic tech bros to get a line-item veto on federal spending!” Yeah well I didn’t vote for Joe Biden’s non-binary Deep State theater kids to get a blank check to give my tax dollars to fringe left-wing NGO slush funds for four years, but that’s exactly what happened. Elections have consequences, one of which being the president of the United States—the CEO of the executive branch—gets to make personnel appointments across the administrative state. Don’t like it? You’ve got two options: 1. Reduce the size, scope, and power of the administrative state. I promise, you’d garner bipartisan support and find willing allies across the political spectrum here. (For some reason, though, Democrats don’t seem to like this idea. Curious. 🤔) 2. Don’t lose the election. Don’t spend four years mismanaging the country and lying to the American people about the president’s health, only to swap him out in the election for a weak, untested, unlikeable candidate who wastes billions of dollars on the poorest-run campaign in modern history. Either way, stop complaining about Elon. We DID vote for this. We returned Trump to office with a strong mandate specifically to end this bullshit. If you don’t like the means—or the personnel choices—by which he’s doing so, that’s on you, not us.

Saved - February 6, 2025 at 12:08 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

💯🇺🇸

@JDVance - JD Vance

“No one voted for Elon Musk.” (They did however vote for Donald Trump who promised repeatedly to have Elon Musk root out wasteful spending in our government.)

Saved - February 7, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@JohnStrandUSA - John Strand

WOW: Stephen Miller goes SCORCHED EARTH on Democrat complaints that @elonmusk is ‘unelected’ “The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected! The FBI that persecuted President Trump for 8 years is unelected!” He’s exactly right. https://t.co/7OinXcGxLU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The term "unelected" used by Democrats is misleading. Donald Trump was elected in a landslide, and his staff, including the national security adviser and chief of staff, serve at his pleasure. They are implementing the agenda chosen by the American people. The real unelected power lies within the bureaucracy, such as USAID, the FBI, and the CIA, which have acted against Trump. President Trump is working to restore democracy by asserting control over the federal bureaucracy. He is the only individual elected by the entire nation to carry out the agenda that reflects the voters' wishes, while other officials are elected at local or state levels. Ultimately, the president is in charge of the federal executive branch.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the Democrat use of the term unelected is really quite remarkable here. Donald Trump was elected in an overwhelming landslide. These are Donald Trump staffers. In the sense, like, saying that Mike Walls, the national security adviser, is unelected or Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, is unelected or Donald Trump's communications team is unelected. This is presidential staff that serves at the pleasure and for the president just as I do. I am a staffer for the president of The United States. He is elected. He is the one that American people have chosen to implement his agenda. This is the agenda the American people voted for that he is asking his staff, his subordinates, his employees to implement. The unelected power in this country is the rogue bureaucracy. USAID is unelected. The FBI that persecuted president Trump for eight years is unelected. The CIA and those who have laundered intelligence to try to change the foreign policy of The United States are unelected. President Trump is restoring democracy by controlling the federal bureaucracy. There is one man in the country who is elected by the whole American people to implement an agenda they support. That is the president. Every other officer in this country Yep. Members of congress and senators are elected at the state or local level. Let me ask you something. I have to continue. One man in charge of the federal executive branch, and that's the president. I understood.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 10:08 PM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 ELON MUSK: THE BUREAUCRACY IS AN UNELECTED FOURTH BRANCH "The Bureacracy currently has more power than elected representatives. That does not match the will of the people!" — @ElonMusk We the People voted to TEAR DOWN the bureaucracy! https://t.co/OmGbVJIovn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our federal bureaucracy must be responsive to the people; that's fundamental to our democracy. Currently, this unelected bureaucracy holds excessive power, exceeding that of elected officials – a situation unacceptable to the public. We must address this imbalance. Furthermore, our $2 trillion deficit demands immediate attention. Failure to act will lead to national bankruptcy. The interest payments on our national debt now surpass even our defense budget, a truly alarming reality given our substantial defense spending. We must find a solution to this critical financial problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But you can't have an autonomous federal bureaucracy. You have to have one that's responsive to the people. That's the whole point of a democracy. And so, and if if you looked at the if if you asked the look at the today and said, what do you think of the way things have turned out? Or what we have this unelected, fourth unconstitutional branch of of government, which which is the bureaucracy, which has, in a lot of ways, currently more power than any elected representative. And this is, this is not something that people want. And it's it's not it does not match the will of people. So it's just something we've gotta we've gotta fix. And then we also gotta address the the deficit. So we've got a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit. And if this if we don't do something about this deficit, country's going bankrupt. I mean, it's it's really astounding that the, the interest payments alone on national debt exceed the defense department budget, which is shocking because we've got a lot of we spend a lot of money on defense.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 10:08 PM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 ELON MUSK: “The people voted for major government reform… and THAT’S what they’re going to get” LET’S GO!!!! 🔥🇺🇸 https://t.co/QBlVgW7pwp

Video Transcript AI Summary
The people clearly voted for major government reform. This was a central campaign promise, discussed at every rally. I made it clear this is what they would receive. My presidency will deliver on that promise. Too often, people don't see their votes reflected in government action. But in this case, the people will get what they voted for – that's the essence of democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for. But in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 12:15 AM

@RealAmVoice - Real America's Voice (RAV)

“THE PUBLIC VOTER FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP, THE PEOPLE VOTED FOR MAJOR GOVERNMENT REFORM, AND THAT’S WHAT THE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET.” - @elonmusk responds to criticism of how he is running DOGE. President @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/UG9iWlFBWs

Video Transcript AI Summary
My critics, including many Democrats, accuse me of orchestrating a hostile, non-transparent government takeover. However, the public clearly voted for major government reform, which is exactly what they'll get. We're committed to transparency; our actions are posted on X and our website. We're implementing simple, basic checks and balances to ensure taxpayer money is used responsibly and correctly categorized. This isn't about individual judgment calls; it's about systemic improvements. Concerns about conflicts of interest, particularly regarding my past federal contracts, are addressed through our commitment to transparency and the implemented checks and balances. All our actions are public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your detractors, mister Muskelet I've what? Including a lot of Democrats. Speaker 1: I have detractors? You do, sir. I don't believe it. Speaker 0: Say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non transparent way. What's your response to that criticism? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, that we we do have a majority of the public vote voting for president Trump, won the house, won the senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for. And that's what democracy is all about. Speaker 0: Mister Vasquez, the White House says that you will identify and excuse yourself from any conflicts of interest that you may have. Does that mean that you are are in effect policing yourself? What are the checks and balances that are in place to ensure that there is accountability and transparency? Well, Speaker 1: we we actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions we post our actions to the the Doge handle, on x, and to the the Doge website. So all of our actions, which are are maximally transparent. In fact, I don't think there's been I I don't know the case that where where, an organization has been more transparent than the Doge organization. K. And and so, you know and and the kind of things we're doing are, I think, very, very simple and basic. They're they're not we're we're you know, what I mentioned, for for example, about treasury, just making sure that that payments that go out, taxpayer money that goes out, is categorized correctly, that the that the the payment is explained, that organizations on the do not pay list, which are takes a lot to get there, that actually are not paid, which currently they are paid. These these are these are not individual judgment decisions. These are about simply having sensible checks and balances in the system itself to ensure that taxpayer money is spread well. So it's got nothing to do with, like, say, a contract with some company of mine at all. Speaker 0: But if there is a conflict in of interest when it comes to you, yourself, for instance, you've received billions of dollars in federal contracts when it comes to the Pentagon, for instance, which the president, I know, has directed you to look into Yeah. Are you policing yourself in that? Is there any sort of accountability check and balance in place that would provide any transparency for the American people? Well, all of our actions are are, sec.
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:19 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

❤️

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Ohhh my god. Look at the ‘Like Count’ on this video On mainstream media CBS, over 620,000 Likes in 24 hours on Elon Musk telling reporters: This time, the American People are going to get what they voted for Support is MASSIVE for Elon Musk and DOGE “They say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non-transparent way. What's your response to that criticism?” Elon Musk “Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump won the house and won the Senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally the people voted for, for major government reform and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And, and a lot of times that, you know, people that don't get what they voted for, but in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have detractors, even some Democrats? Well, I don't believe it. The criticism that I'm orchestrating a hostile takeover of government in a non-transparent way is unfounded. We have a strong mandate from the public. The people voted, giving President Trump the majority, winning the House and Senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt; it was a key part of the campaign. That's what people are going to get. They're going to get what they voted for. In this presidency, that's exactly what will happen, and that's what democracy is all about.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tractors, mister Musky. I have to what? Including a lot of Democrats. I have detractors? You do, sir. I don't believe it. Say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of government and doing it in a non transparent way. What's your response to that criticism? Well, first first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from from the public. The public voted, you know, we we have a majority of the public vote voting for president Trump, won the house, won the senate. The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was on the campaign. The president spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for for major government reform, and that's what people are gonna get. They're gonna get what they voted for. And and a lot of times, you know, people that don't get what they voted for. But in this presidency, they are gonna get what they voted for. And that's what democracy is all about.
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the recent interview with Sean Hannity, Elon Musk expressed his admiration for President Trump, stating he believes Trump is a good man who has been unfairly attacked by the media. Musk revealed his intention to endorse Trump was always there, but recent events accelerated it. He described his role as "tech support" for the President, ensuring executive orders are executed. Musk defended Robert F. Kennedy Jr. against claims of being anti-science, emphasized the importance of questioning science, and warned about the dangers of America's growing debt. Trump praised Musk as a smart and patriotic businessman.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk Delivers a Powerful Statement on Bobby Kennedy Jr. Plus, more must-see moments from the Trump-Musk interview. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/AVPelCMAbh

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Fox News’ Sean Hannity just released Part 1 of his highly anticipated interview with President Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Musk, who leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), shared key insights not only on Trump but also on what he believes is needed to fix America’s broken system and restore the will of the people. The interview kicked off with Musk sharing how much he “loves” President Trump, making it clear to everyone that he believes he is a “good man.” “I love the president. I just want to be clear about that,” Musk said. “The president has been so unfairly attacked in the media. It’s truly outrageous. And I’ve, at this point, spent a lot of time with the president, and not once have I seen him do something that was mean or cruel or wrong. Not once.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I love a president, and I think President Trump is a good man. There's just something nice about him, you know? The president has been so unfairly attacked in the media; it's truly outrageous. I've spent a lot of time with the president, and not once have I seen him do something that was mean, cruel, or wrong.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If if you read and believe the media, you become one of your best friends. He's working for free for you. Speaker 1: Well, I love a president. I just wanna be clear about that. Speaker 0: You don't care about that. Speaker 1: I know. I love the I I I Speaker 0: love the president. Speaker 1: I think I think president Trump is a good man. And and he's, you know, I Speaker 0: said that's the way he said that, you know? It's something nice about it. Speaker 1: It really is. You know? Because, I mean, the president has been so unfairly attacked in the media. It's truly outrageous. And I, at this point, spent a lot of time, with the president. And not once have I seen him do something that was mean or cruel or wrong. Not once.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk also revealed something President Trump didn’t know: he had always planned to endorse him, but the assassination attempt just “sped it up.” HANNITY: “And then culminating in two assassination attempts which resulted in your endorsement.” MUSK: “Well, I was going to do it anyway, but that was it… That sped it up, but I was going to do it anyway.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've known him for thirty years, and I've never seen anyone endure as much as he has. We've talked about it, and I always ask him how he copes with it. His response is always, "Did I have a choice? What am I going to do? Worry?" The culmination was the two assassination attempts, which led to my endorsement. I was planning to endorse him anyway, but those attempts really sped things up. The day of the assassination attempt, I didn't know what to do, but it just made my decision that much easier. I was going to do it anyway.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I've known him for thirty years. Yeah. And I've never seen anybody take as much as he's taken. Yeah. And we've discussed this, and I'm like, how do you deal with it? Did I have a choice? Well, you would say that to me. I'm like, what am I what am I what am I gonna do? Worry about it? And, know, and then culminating in two assassination attempts, which resulted in your endorsement. Well, I was gonna do it anyway, but that was That was it. Precipitating event. Yes. That's really it. Yeah. A little bit. Yeah. The day of the assassination. I didn't know that. Yeah. It just it sped it up, but I was gonna do it anyway.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk described one of his roles in serving America as being President Trump’s “tech support”—meaning he and his team work to ensure the President’s executive orders are actually implemented. “That’s why my T-shirt says ‘tech support,’ because I’m here to provide the President with technology support,” Musk explained. “One of the biggest functions of the DOGE team is just making sure that the presidential executive orders are actually carried out.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I see myself as a technologist focused on creating technologies that improve the world. My "tech support" shirt reflects my role in providing technology support to the president. It's crucial because executive orders, though sensible and beneficial for the country, often aren't implemented effectively. For instance, the president issued an executive order to stop using taxpayer money for luxury hotels for illegal immigrants, which is a waste of resources. Despite the order, this practice continued. My team intervened, pointing out the violation of the presidential executive order and demanding its termination. A primary function of the "Doers team" is ensuring that presidential executive orders are actually enforced.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: PayPal and how you became involved in Tesla and SpaceX and Neuralink and all these I mean, you know, I think the way you think of me is like I'm a technologist and I try to make technologies that improve the world and make sure You got a shirt on your shirt. Yeah. And and that's why I like my t shirt says tech support because I'm I'm here to provide the president with with technology support. And now that that may seem like, well, is that a silly thing? But actually, it's a very important thing because, the president will make these executive orders, which are very sensible and good for the country, but then they don't get implemented, you know. So, if you take the, for example, the full funding for the migrant hotels, the president issued an executive order. Hey. We need to stop taking taxpayer money and and paying for luxury hotels for illegal immigrants. Which makes no sense. Like, so obviously, people do not want their tax dollars going to to to fund high end hotels for for illegals. And yet they were still doing that even as late as last week. And so, you know, we went in there and we're like, this is a violation of the presidential executive order. It needs to stop. So so so what we're what we're doing here is is one of the biggest functions of the Doers team is just making sure that the presidential executive orders are actually carried out.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hannity asked Trump and Musk about the media’s blatant attempts to drive a wedge between them, using tactics like calling Musk the “President” or claiming he’s “running the country.” Trump mocked the media’s efforts, saying it is “obvious” what they are trying to do. “They’re so bad at it. I used to think they were good at it. They’re actually bad at it because if they were good at it, I’d never be president,” Trump said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We both know the media and punditry threw everything they had at us, the New York Times, Washington Post, all the networks and late night shows, cable channels, lawfare, weaponization, but they didn't win. Now they want us to hate each other and are trying to drive us apart. I see it all the time. Elon even called me about it. They tried to say I ceded control of the presidency to him, that President Musk would be attending a cabinet meeting. It's so obvious and they're so bad at it. If they were good, I'd never have been president with all the bad publicity I get. But the people are smart. They get it and see what's happening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're both aware, you have to be keenly aware that the media and and the punditry class, not that you know, I think you've proven they have no power anymore. Because they threw everything they had at you, and they didn't win. And that was, you know, the New York Times, Washington Post, three networks, every late night comedy show, two cable channels. They just threw they threw everything, lawfare, weaponization. And now I see they want you two to start they they want a divorce. They want you two to start hating each other, and they try oh, president Elon Musk, for example. You do know that they're doing that to you. Speaker 1: Oh, I see it all the time. They they tried it, then they stopped. That wasn't they have many different things, of hatred. Actually, Elon called me. He said, you know, they're trying to drive us apart. I said, absolutely. You know, they said, we have breaking news. Donald Trump has ceded control of the presidency to Elon Musk. President Musk will be attending a cabinet meeting tonight at 08:00. And I say, it's just so obvious. They're so bad at it. I used to think they were good at it. They're actually bad at it because if they were good at it, I'd never be president. Because I I think nobody in history has ever gotten more bad publicity than me. I could do the greatest things. I get 98% bad publicity. I could do outside of you and a few of your very good friends. Right. It's like the craziest thing. But, you know what I have learned, Elon? The people are smart. They get it. Speaker 0: Yeah. They do. Speaker 1: They get it. They really see what's happening. Speaker 0: Yes.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Trump then poked fun at Elon Musk’s team of a “hundred geniuses” at DOGE, saying they dress even worse than Musk—yet he was amazed by how well they get things done. “He’s got some very brilliant young people working for him that http://dre.ss much worse than him. Actually, they dress in just T-shirts,” Trump said. But the team’s results speak for themselves. “You write a beautiful executive [order], you sign it, and you assume it’s going to be done—but it’s not… He [Musk] would take that executive order that I’d sign, and he would have those [DOGE] people go to whatever agency it was. ‘When are you doing it? Get it done.’ And some guy that maybe didn’t want to do it, all of a sudden he’s signing.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wanted someone smart working with me, especially on important country matters. He's also a very good businessman. When you write executive orders, you think they'll be implemented, but they often aren't. He takes my executive orders and has his team of brilliant young people ensure they get done. He makes sure that the agencies get it done. In real estate, you see similar things where some people can draw beautiful renderings, but they can't get the building built. He's one of those guys that can get it done. He makes sure things happen and pushes people to act.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted somebody really smart to work with me in terms of the country, a very important aspect. Because, I mean, he doesn't talk about it. He's actually a very good businessman. And when he talks about the executive orders, and this is probably true for all presidents. Yeah. You write an executive order and you think it's done. You send it out. It doesn't get done. It doesn't get implemented. They don't implement it. They maybe they're from the last administration, and they are in some cases. You try and get them out as fast as you can. But I could as soon as he said that, I said, you know, that's interesting. You write a beautiful executive and you you sign it and you assume it's gonna be done, but it's not. What he does is he takes it and with his hundred geniuses, he's got some very brilliant young people working for him that dress much worse than him, actually. They dress in just t shirts. You wouldn't you wouldn't know they have a 80 items. Wait a minute. So he he's he's your tech support. I I No. No. He is. But he's much more than that. Yeah. I'm technically on tech support, though. But that's He gets it done. He's a leader. Yeah. He really is a he gets it done. You get a lot of tech people, and you have people that go to a tech, but they he gets it done. You know, I said in real estate, you had guys that would draw beautiful renderings of a building, and they'd draw the rendering. It would be great. And you say, great. What are you starting? But they were never able to get it built. They couldn't get the finances. They couldn't get the approvals. It would never get done. And then you have other guys that are able to get it done. You know? They could just get it done. I was in real estate. Same thing in this. He gets it done. So when he said that, he said, you know, when you sign these executive orders, a lot of them don't get done and may be the most important ones. And he would take that executive order that I'd signed, and he would have those people go to whatever agency it was. When are you doing it? Get it done. Get it done. And some guy that maybe didn't wanna do it, all of a sudden, he's signing. He just doesn't Do you want to be bothered?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the standout moments of the night came when Elon Musk issued a profound statement defending HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “I think he’s unfairly maligned as someone who is anti-science, but I think he isn’t,” Musk declared before making a statement that completely shattered the relentless “anti-science” smears against him. “He just wants to question the science, which is the essence of the science. The scientific method, fundamentally, is about always questioning the science,” Musk argued.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This thread isn’t over yet, but while you’re here, don’t forget to follow me (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more reports like this one. https://t.co/TyIntEp1PX

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In one of the most memorable moments of the night, Trump said he wanted to find someone smarter than Elon Musk to help him—he just couldn’t find anyone who actually was. TRUMP: “I wanted to find somebody smarter than him. I searched all over. I just couldn’t do it… We settled on this guy.” MUSK: “I’m just trying to be useful here.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, so the richest guy in the world is on our team. I know that's a tough pill to swallow if you are competitive, but it's true. I tried to find someone smarter than him, believe me, I searched everywhere, but I couldn't do it. For the good of the country, we settled on the best person for the job. Thanks for having me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The richest man in the world. You may not like that part. You're pretty competitive. Speaker 1: You're a general there. Speaker 2: It'll only be a long time. But, but he's Speaker 3: on your team. Speaker 2: Isn't it? Well, that's true. He can't top that. He's he's good. You know, I wanted to find somebody smarter than him. I searched all over. I just couldn't do it. I couldn't. You I could really try it harder. I couldn't find anyone smarter. Right? So we had a we had it for the country. Speaker 3: But this is Speaker 2: the thing settled on we settled on this. Speaker 1: Well, thanks for having me. Speaker 2: So I understand. This is the

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The conversation shifted to “Trump Derangement Syndrome” (TDS), with Musk sharing a hilarious personal story about a dinner party in L.A. Musk explained that talking to liberals about Trump feels like dealing with people “shot with a dart in the jugular that contained methamphetamine and rabies.” He emphasized this point further, posting “seriously” in a quote tweet of this very video. https://t.co/uMGLQ494Lc

Video Transcript AI Summary
I used to be adored by the left, but not so much these days. It's like this "Trump derangement syndrome" is real. You can't even reason with people. I was at a friend's birthday dinner once, a nice, quiet gathering. I happened to mention the president's name, and it was like everyone got shot with a dart filled with meth and rabies. I mean, what's wrong with you guys? You can't even have a normal conversation. It's like they become completely irrational.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would think liberals would love the fact that you have the biggest electric vehicle company in Speaker 1: the world. Yeah. I mean, I used to be adored by other left, you know. Yeah. Not anymore. Less so these days. Killed that, I mean, less I I really didn't know that. Speaker 0: Well, I Speaker 1: mean, this this whole sort of, like, you know, it was they call it, like, Trump deranged syndrome. And I didn't you know, you don't realize how real this is until, like, it's you can't reason with people. So, like, I was at a friend's, birthday party in LA, just a birthday dinner. And it was, like, a nice quiet dinner and everything was everyone was behaving normally. And I happened to mention this is before the election, like, a month or two before. I have to mention the president's name. And it was like they got shot with a dart in the in the jugular that contained, like, methamphetamine and rabies. Okay? And I'm like, what is wrong? Guys, like, you just can't have, like, a normal conversation. Yeah. And it's like it's it's it's like they become completely irrational.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Seriously 😂😂 https://t.co/cTPjmVEB5D

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the more brilliant moments came when Musk delivered the perfect comeback to those complaining, “Nobody voted for Elon.” “Speaking of unelected, there’s a vast federal bureaucracy that is implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet,” Musk shot back. “And you look at D.C. voting, it’s 92% Kamala. Okay, so we’re 92% Kamala. That’s a lot... That’s basically almost everyone. And so, if the will of the president is not implemented and the president is representative of the people, that means the will of the people is not being implemented. And that means we don’t live in a democracy.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The other side is complaining that nobody voted for Elon or any of my cabinet nominees. They say people are dying because of budget cuts and even allege illegal activity. But frankly, I don't care. If they're complaining, we must be over the target and doing something right. We're simply trying to restore the will of the people through the President. What we've found is a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy that is against the President and the cabinet. In DC, it's 92% Kamala. How can we live in a democracy if the President's will, representing the people, isn't implemented? We're witnessing the bureaucracy thrashing as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this is what you get for it from the Democrats you get nobody voted for Elon or nobody voted for any of your cabinet nominees. Okay. People are dying because of doge cuts. I'll give you a chance to respond all that. What doge is doing is illegal. Elon Musk is small street vernacular for a male body part. It's a constitutional crisis. Speaker 1: Okay. Why why are they reacting like this? Speaker 0: Well, I'm first of all, do you give a fly and rip over number one? And Well, I guess we must Speaker 1: be over the target or doing something right, you know. If like, they wouldn't be complaining so much if they we weren't doing something useful, I think. But what what what all we're really trying to do here is restore, the will of the people through the president. And and what we're finding is that there's an unelected bureaucracy. Speaking of unelected, there's a there's a vast federal bureaucracy that is implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. And you look at, say, DC voting, it's 92% Kamala. Okay. So we're in 92% Kamala. That's a lot. Speaker 0: They don't like me here either. Speaker 1: I think about that number a lot. And, like, 92%, that's basically almost everyone. Yeah. And so but but if but but how can you if if if the will of the president is not implemented and the president is representative of the people, that means the will of the people is not being implemented. And that means we we don't live in a democracy. We live in a bureaucracy. And so I think what we're seeing here is the sort of the thrashing of the the bureaucracy as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As Part 1 of the conversation neared its end, Musk issued a grave warning, stating that if America doesn’t get its $36 trillion debt under control, financial collapse is inevitable. “If the deficit is not brought under control, America will go bankrupt. This is a very important thing for people to understand. A country is no different from an individual in that if an individual overspends, an individual can go bankrupt, and so can a country. And the massive waste, fraud, and abuse that has been going on, which is leading to a $2 trillion-a-year deficit. That’s what the President was handed on January 20th,” Musk explained.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are working to cut a trillion dollars from the deficit because if we don't get the deficit under control, America will go bankrupt. A country is no different than an individual. If you overspend, you will go bankrupt, and the massive waste and abuse that has been going on has led to a $2 trillion a year deficit. That is what the President was handed on January 20th: a $2 trillion deficit. It's insane.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Much do you think you've identified waste, fraud, abuse, corruption at this point? And then again, we've been we're gonna be scrolling this throughout the program. Speaker 1: Well, the the overall goal is to try to get a trillion dollars out of the deficit. And if the deficit is not brought under control, America will go bankrupt. This is a very important thing for people to understand. A country is no different from an individual in that if an individual overspends, an individual can go bankrupt, and so can a country. And and the the the massive waste water abuse that has been going on, which is leading to a $2,000,000,000,000 a year deficit, that that's what the president was handed on Jan twentieth, a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit. It's insane. Speaker 0: For this fiscal year? Speaker 1: 2,000,000,000,000. Speaker 0: Yeah. We inherited.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The final highlight came when Trump said @ElonMusk stands out as one of the smartest and most patriotic businessmen he knows. He explained that while he’s dealt with many smart businesspeople, not all of them are necessarily good people. “He [Musk],” on the other hand, “is a very different kind of character,” Trump stressed. “I know a lot of great businesspeople, really great businesspeople, but, you know, they’re not really, in some cases, very good people. And I know people who would try to take advantage of the situation. “This guy is somebody that really cares for the country. And I saw that very early on. I saw it a long time ago when I got to know him. He’s a very different kind of character,” Trump said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I know a lot of business people, the good, the bad, the smart, and the lucky. This person is brilliant, with tremendous and scientific imagination, far beyond just a technologist. He's also a genuinely good person who wants the best for the country. I know many great business people who aren't necessarily good people, some who would even take advantage of situations. But this person truly cares for the country, which I recognized early on. He's a different kind of character, and that's why smart, patriotic young people admire him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know every businessman. I know the the good ones, the bad ones, the smart ones, the lucky ones. I know them. This guy's a very he's a brilliant guy. He's a great guy. He's got tremendous imagination and scientific imagine. Far beyond, you know, you keep talking about a technologist and all, but you're much more than a technologist. You are that. But he's also a good person. He's a very good person, and he wants to see the country do well. And I know a lot of great business people, really great business people, but, you know, they're not really, in some cases, very good people. And I know people that would try and take advantage of the situation. This guy is somebody that really cares for the country, and I saw that very early on. I saw it really a long time ago when I got to know him. He's a very different kind of a character. That's why, you know who loves him? Young people that are very smart and that love the country.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@elonmusk Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more. In other news, Dr. Deborah Birx just dropped two shocking COVID admissions that the “conspiracy theorists” knew all along. Read more below: https://t.co/kWn8YQgYYZ

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Deborah Birx Makes Two Shocking COVID Admissions The “conspiracy theorists” were right again. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/TcUOg6P6Y9

Saved - March 6, 2025 at 12:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats are targeting me because I’ve exposed their fraud, particularly regarding entitlement programs. They are manipulating the system to buy votes, which I see as a significant threat to democracy. If they had succeeded, they would have solidified their power by legalizing enough undocumented immigrants in swing states, turning them permanently blue. This would lead to a complete Democratic control of the House, Senate, and presidency, allowing them to further manipulate the system, similar to what has occurred in California.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s simple. Democrats attack Elon Musk for exposing their fraud “Why is the Democrat propaganda machine so fired up to destroy me. The main reason is that entitlements fraud, that includes like Social Security, disability, Medicaid, entitlements fraud” “What's actually happening is they're buying voters that's really what's happening it's like it's like a giant voter fraud scam they're importing voters — It is an attempt to destroy democracy in America.” “They almost succeeded.” “If the machine of which the Kamala puppet was the representation had won, that's what would have happened. The reason I went so hardcore for Trump was because to me this was a fork in the road, like a very obvious fork in the road. If they had another 4 years, they would legalize enough illegals in the swing states to make the swing states, not swing states. They would just be blue states. Then they would win the presidential, they'd win the House, the Senate, and the presidency. They would then make DC into a state, maybe Puerto Rico, get four extra senators, pack the Supreme Court, so then you'll have the House, Judiciary, Senate, and presidency all blue and then they will keep importing more illegals to cement that outcome. Basically what happened in California.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democratic party is trying to destroy me by using entitlements fraud to attract illegal aliens, which will turn them into voters. In New York, illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections, and FEMA was paying for them to stay in luxury hotels. This is a voter fraud scam to import voters. If you put 200,000 illegals in swing states, they will likely vote Democrat, turning those states blue and creating a permanent one-party socialist state. This was the Democrats' plan, and they almost succeeded. If they had won, they would have legalized enough illegals in swing states to make them permanently blue, ensuring a Democratic victory in the House, Senate, and presidency. Then they would pack the Supreme Court, add DC and Puerto Rico as states, and continue importing illegals to solidify their power, like what happened in California.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a democrat propaganda machine so fired up to destroy me, that's the main reason. The main reason is that is that entitlements fraud that includes, like, Social Security, disability, Medicaid, entitlements fraud for illegal aliens is what is serving as a gigantic magnetic force to pull people in from all around the world and keep them here. Like, basically, if you if you pay people at a standard of living that is above 90% of Earth, then you have a very powerful incentive for 90% of Earth to come here and to stay here. But if you if you end the illegal alien fraud, then you that you turn off that magnet and they leave. And they they stop coming, and the and the ones that are here, many of them will simply leave. And if if that happens, a mass they will lose a massive number of Democratic voters. Speaker 1: And if it didn't happen, they would turn those people into voters Correct. Which they were trying to do. Speaker 0: They are already turning them so in in in New York state, illegal aliens can already vote in state and city elections. A lot of people don't don't know that. There's there's that I mean, they're trying to fight them, and they're trying to stop that, but it's they're currently I think it's, like, 600,000 are registered to vote, illegal aliens in New York. Speaker 1: That is wild. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, mean, if you look and say, you know, FEMA, like, the the agency that was paying for illegal aliens to stay at luxury hotels in New York was FEMA. The fed you know, that's meant that that's an agency that's meant to support Americans in distress from natural disasters was paying for luxury hotels for illegals in New York. It's true. Yeah. That's a fact. Fact. They're literally like, when when we stopped that payment, we we stopped all those those money because that's obviously an insane way to spend taxpayer money. The New York sued the government sued the federal government to get the money. So you could just look at their lawsuit. They they they were get they were sending that money even after president Trump signed an executive order saying it needs to stop. They still press send on $80,000,000 to luxury hotels in New York. Your tax money went to pay for legal aliens in luxury hotels in New York from an agency that is meant to help Americans in distress from natural disasters. Speaker 1: Right. And I would like to know how much. And I would like to know how much they spend on North Carolina and how much they spend on Maui. Speaker 0: Yes. Exactly. What what's actually happening is they're buying voters. That's really what's happening. It's like it's like a giant voter fraud scam. They're importing voters, and and it's really just a matter of time. So, like, if a lot of people have trouble believing this, but if you the more you look at it, the more you will realize just how much of a problem this is and how it's it's it's not just real. It is it is an attempt to destroy democracy in America. That's what it in my view, it it is what it really is. Like, if you take the the the sort of seven swing states, like, often the margin of victory there is, like, maybe 20,000 votes. If you put 200,000 illegals in there, and they have, like, a 80% likelihood of voting down, and it's only a matter of time before they become citizens, then those swing states will not be swing states in the future. And if they are not swing states, we'll be a permanent one party state country, Permanent deep blue socialist state. That's what America will become. Speaker 1: And that was the game plan? Speaker 0: That that was that was the game plan. That is still the game plan. And so they almost succeeded. If if if the if the machine of which the Kamala puppet was the representation had won, that's what would have happened. The reason I went so hardcore for for for for Trump was because, to me, this was a fork in the road. A very like, a very obvious fork in the road. If they had another four years, they would legalize enough illegals in the swing states to make the swing states not swing states. They would just they would be blue states. Then then they would they would win the presidential they they'd win the house, the senate, and the presidency. They would then make district, you know, DC into a state. May maybe Puerto Rico get four extra senators, pack the supreme court, so then you'll have the house, judiciary, senate, and presidency, all blue. And then they will keep importing more illegals to cement that that outcome. Basically, what happened in California.
Saved - March 12, 2025 at 3:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I love how Bill Burr is calling out Elon Musk again, this time criticizing Democrats for their inaction. He really doesn’t hold back, labeling Musk an "idiot" and expressing frustration with liberals for being scared of him. It’s a bold take on the current political landscape.

@WUTangKids - Wu Tang is for the Children

Love Bill Burr going in on Elon again and this time with some 🔥 for Dems not doing anything….no lies detected

Video Transcript AI Summary
This idiot Elon Musk is evidently a Nazi. I refuse to believe the Sieg Heil was accidental, especially at a presidential inauguration. Liberals have no teeth! They just say, "Oh my god!" and threaten to leave the country because of one guy with hair plugs who runs a bad car company and obsolete social media platform. Why isn't he stopped? Liberals need to speak up, not just whine. I'm a comedian, it's not my job to lead the charge, I'm talking about democratic politicians! These neo-Nazis are stupid and don't realize Hitler ruined their own country. This idiot's gonna try to lead us down that road and act like he didn't do anything wrong. You can get canceled as a comedian for a Caitlyn Jenner joke, but this guy can Sieg Heil with no consequences? Where are all the white chicks from the award shows who were speaking truth to power? Why did they choose to go after comedians and not the KKK?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That idiot Elon Musk. Oh. That guy, like, he's gonna who evidently is a Nazi. Like, I Speaker 1: just refuse to believe that it was an accidental two times Sieg Heil, and he does it at a presidential inauguration. This is why I hate liberals. It's like liberals have no teeth whatsoever. They just go, oh my god. Can you believe? I'm getting out of the country. I'm just like, well, you're gonna leave the country because of one guy with dyed hair plugs and a laminated face who runs a who makes a bad car and has has an obsolete social media platform. You're you're gonna leave this why doesn't he leave? Why isn't he stopped? What are we so afraid of this guy who can't fight his way out of a wet paper bag? Speaker 0: You can take him on? Speaker 1: Like, what is the what what why why do liberals just sit back and not they they they just they they have nothing. Speaker 0: What what what are you doing? Speaker 1: This. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: This. You gotta speak up about it. You don't just go like, oh my god. What? Ugh. Like like, listen. First of all, it's like, I'm a stand up comedian. It's not my freaking I'm talking about, like, democratic politicians. Where is their pushback? They're allegedly liberal. You see this guy do this thing. You know what the end result of this thing is, which all these neo Nazis, not only they stupid because they're neo Nazis, they don't even look at what Hitler did. He ruined their country, and this idiot is gonna try to lead us down that road and then play it off and act like he didn't do what he just did. And you can get canceled as a comedian for doing a freaking Caitlyn Jenner joke, but this ass can can see Kyle and nothing where are all the liberals? Where are all of these these these these white chicks at the award shows that were speaking truth to power? Where are they? Why did they choose to go after comedians and not the Ku Klux Klan? How come they never got canceled?

@Variety - Variety

Bill Burr Says 'Idiot' Elon Musk Is 'Evidently a Nazi' With 'Dyed Hair Plugs and a Laminated Face': 'I Hate Liberals' for Being 'So Afraid of This Guy' https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/bill-burr-elon-musk-idiot-liberals-afraid-1236334565/

Bill Burr Says ‘Idiot’ Elon Musk Is ‘Evidently a Nazi’ With ‘Dyed Hair Plugs and a Laminated Face’: ‘I Hate Liberals’ for Being ‘So Afraid of This Guy’ Bill Burr hates liberals for being afraid of Elon Musk: "Why are we so afraid of this guy who can't fight his way out of a wet paper bag?" variety.com

@WUTangKids - Wu Tang is for the Children

He’s talking elected Dems…check around 1:09 mark

@DankDudeBruh - Extra Dank

@WUTangKids Bill attacking liberals though ? Liberals didn’t vote for trump

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 7:15 AM

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

When Barack Obama says it the left fawns. When Elon Musk says it the left burns Teslas. https://t.co/cR0mC8AhnX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a campaign to cut government waste, stating that deficit reduction requires difficult choices, including cuts to valued programs. They claim there has been a tremendous amount of waste and fraud in the government during the Biden administration, estimating federal government fraud at half a trillion dollars. The goal is to reduce this figure, saving taxpayer money by stopping spending on things that very few taxpayers would agree makes sense. Examples cited include transgender animal surgeries and the presence of twenty million dead people in the Social Security database.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone knows that getting rid of the deficit will require some tough decisions, and that includes cutting back on billions of dollars in programs that a lot of people care about. But what should be easy is getting rid of the pointless waste and stupid spending that doesn't benefit anybody. We're calling it the campaign to cut waste. Speaker 1: You know, there's been a tremendous amount of of waste and fraud in the in the government during the Biden administration, which estimated the the federal government fraud to be half a trillion dollars. What we're trying to do is get that number down to a much smaller figure, save money for the American taxpayer, stop money being spent on things that are that I think very few taxpayers would agree makes sense, You know, transgender animal surgeries or why are the twenty million people who are definitely dead mocked as alive in the Social Security database?
View Full Interactive Feed