TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

AethingInc
Posted - June 4, 2023 at 4:13 PM
Saved - July 17, 2023 at 9:17 PM

@AethingInc - Aething Inc.

The same situation with one crime cartel @BinanceHelpDesk @BrianShroder https://t.co/2F3OVL1aqE

@AethingInc - Aething Inc.

The experiment called "are there limits to human greed, laziness and stupidity" is over. There are no borders. If a scoundrel is allowed to create a company that does not pay taxes and does business on it, the scoundrel will be so stupid and greedy that he will not even be able… https://t.co/kcchIZjfTf

l42022425
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 5:35 PM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 5:02 PM

@l42022425 - THiS LiL’ MiSS Can’t Be Wrong

Good IRS . Goodbye Goodbye Rothschilds. Goodbye Monarchy. Goodbye Vatican. Hello #1776 Worldwide. Hello QFS. Hello Golden Age. You know what is coming. American Patriot #TheStormHasArrived

Prolotario1
Posted - November 1, 2023 at 8:24 PM
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 7:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The IRS budget cuts lead to staffing reductions, causing a decrease in their capacity to process returns, answer questions, and collect taxes. This may result in the IRS shutting down entirely. However, they cannot create new taxes or raise rates without legislation from Congress. The implications are significant, including potential bankruptcy and the ongoing EPA case in West Virginia.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

👍@TinaEdelDe Can I ask you all a question? Why am I always on the money with this shit? I could have sworn I called this. Do you know the implications? 🤣 Guess who will be (If not already) bankrupt? Do not even get me started on the EPA case in West Virginia. https://t.co/6OcsPZcGbF

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

"Not only that this will eventually lead to them shutting down entirely. Why? Staffing. IRS budget cuts often mean hiring freezes and staff reductions. This decreases their capacity to process returns, answer questions, and collect taxes. This will cause chokes in the system. The IRS cannot create new forms of taxes or raise rates on its own - that requires legislation passed by Congress. So they can not act vindictive because of this move". End quote.

Prolotario1
Posted - November 3, 2023 at 2:16 PM
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 4:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: The IRS Budget Crisis and Implications for Taxpayers The IRS is facing a severe budget crisis, with its entire $14 billion budget being redirected towards foreign aid. This depletion of funds will have significant consequences for the agency's operations and services. Congressional appropriations, user fees, and revolving funds that support the IRS will be affected, leading to potential challenges in tax collection and enforcement. Various offices within the IRS, including the Commissioner's office, Chief Counsel office, Operations Support, and Taxpayer Services, will experience budget cuts impacting their ability to function effectively. The recent West Virginia vs EPA Supreme Court ruling also raises questions about the power and authority of government agencies. Additionally, the Treasury Offset Program allows the IRS to garnish wages and collect debts from taxpayers. Despite the closure of the physical IRS building, the automated system continues to operate, affecting taxpayers' payments. It is crucial to understand the ongoing budget crisis and its implications for taxpayers.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The IRS Problem: The 14 Billion Dollar Tab Are you under the new monetary system now? No. Did Iraq reinstate their currency on the Forex Market? No. Did speaker Mike Johnson send your tax money to Israel? No. Why are these questions important? Because the American 1st policies are on the other side of the new financial system that will be funded by "Real Money". Why in the world are some people upset that fiat debt that was stolen from you in the form of taxes is being used to defund the IRS? Their entire budget is depleted. Do you know what this will lead to? Congressional Appropriations: The IRS receives the majority of its funding from Congress. This funding is used to cover the costs of operations, including salaries, benefits, and technology. How in the world will they be able to collect taxes when they will not have any money to pay the employees hired to do it? You think people want to work for free? You can thank Mike Johnson for that. User fees: The IRS also collects user fees for certain services, such as tax preparation assistance and e-filing. These fees help to offset the cost of providing these services. Guess what? How is this service going to function when they will have to rely on tax revenue they will not be able to afford to finance if the fees itself are continent upon services they can't afford dye to budget cuts? You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Revolving Funds: The IRS also has a number of revolving funds, which are used to finance certain activities, such as tax enforcement and taxpayer services. These funds are replenished with revenue from the activities they support. How are they going to be able to use these funds for daily operational cost when you do not even file until April next year? Remember the IRS is a Democrat agency. Guess who runs the House & Senate? Republicans. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of The Commissioner: This office oversees the IRS and is responsible for developing and implementing tax policy. The budget for the OTC includes funding for salaries, benefits, and travel. Sections where the budget goes for the building that will be impacted includes what? The Commissioner's office. The IRS Executive Committee Suite. The IRS Briefing Room. Remember, they have no budget for this year or next. Their entire 14 billion is being used for foreign aid. This agency has been used to bully you into submission. Property seizure and jail time if you do not pay. And they are facing bankruptcy now? You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of Chief Counsel: The office provides legal advice to the IRS and represents the IRS in Maritime court. The budget for this office also includes funding for salaries, benefits, and travel. The lack of budget will impact what areas? The Chief Counsel office. The IRS Legal Library. The IRS Hearing Room. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of Operations Support: This area provides support services to the IRS, such as human resources, information technology, and security. The budget for this includes funding for salaries, benefits, and technology. What will be impacted when there is no money in the budget? The IRS Data Center. The IRS Security Command Center. The IRS Employee Training Center. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of Taxpayer Services: This area provides assistance to taxpayers with tax preparation and filing. The budget for this also includes again funding for salaries, benefits, and tech. What areas will be impacted for the lack of budget to function? The IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center. The IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) Site. The IRS Taxpayer Education Center. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Are you getting the impression that I am rubbing this in your face? If so you are correct. Can I whisper something in your ear? Pssst.... come here. The IRS is already shutdown. How? Watch Nancy Drew on Telegram dated 1/16/22 she gives daily updates on how this building has been closed for years. But no need to to search I will post it here. (https://t.me/KBlive/6257) Do you want to know one reason how this physical shutdown happened? The West Virginia vs EPA Supreme Court Ruling. You haven't heard of this in your mainstream news. Want to know why? Because it's owned by the same people that owns the IRS. The Rothschilds/Khazarians. West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a U.S. Supreme Court case. It asks whether important policies that impact the lives of all Americans, should be made by unelected D.C. bureaucrats or by congress. This SCOTUS decision that ruling by executive agency is no longer acceptable. So any laws that are on the books that haven't been passed through congress are void. This includes EOs and government agencies “rules”. [June 30, 2022] JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE ALITO joined, con- curring. To resolve today’s case the Court invokes the major ques- tions doctrine. Under that doctrine’s terms, administrative agencies must be able to point to “‘clear congressional au- thorization’ when they claim the power to make decisions of vast "economic and political significance". Ante, at 17, 19. Like many parallel clear-statement rules in our law, this one operates to protect foundational constitutional guarantees. I join the Court’s opinion and write to offer some additional observations about the doctrine on which it rests. Since 1970, the major questions doctrine soon took on spe- cial importance.2 In 1980, this Court held it “unreasonable to assume” that Congress gave an agency “unprecedented power[s]” in the “absence of a clear [legislative] mandate.” Industrial Union Dept., AFL–CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, 448 U. S. 607, 645 (plurality opinion). In the years that followed, the Court routinely enforced “the non- delegation doctrine” through “the interpretation of status. What does this ruling ultimately mean for 3 letter agencies? A. This latest Supreme Court ruling will allow the demise of the power the EPA. In a landmark case, West Virginia vs. EPA, it was decided that these congress created agencies are not part of the Republic. This ends the following agencies. FBI CIA ATF DEA IRS NIH CDC FDA School Boards and more! This cornerstone case was set up to take the whole corrupt government. The power is being returned back to the people and government will be curtailed to 10%. That means, all Executive Order DS-(Deep Space) POTUS created agencies that were unconstitutional can now be removed. All 3 letter agencies. The States that don’t follow this? Will be sent to GITMO. Guess what? Mike Johnson was sworn in under the Republic. Why do you think D. Trump is so bold in saying we can take the country back in less than 5 months? You do not find it funny that the FBI is now going after Democrats? Stop the Fucking crying & whining.

Nancy Drew Fb live ❤️ 1/16/22 12:45 am IRS Building update t.me

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The IRS uses an automated system to garnish wages. It is called the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). The TOP allows the IRS to collect debts from taxpayers by directly offsetting their federal payments, such as tax refunds and Social Security benefits. The TOP can also be used to garnish wages, but only after the IRS has sent the taxpayer a notice and given them the opportunity to challenge the levy. So even you seeing the video of the building being closed your taxes/wages can still be taken with or without your consent. We are not officially under the new system yet. No new exchange rates. No new gold standard. No new financial system. So if you are still dealing with payments this is why. Because you ate paying the machine. Not the physical IRS building itself. Your issues are with the computer system. We haven't switched over yet. Give it time. Please. Tired of seeing the whining.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The Senate is composed of 50 Democrats, 49 Republicans, and 2 independents who caucus with the Democrats. Democrats & Republicans ousted Kevin McCarthy. All 208 Democrats in attendance voted against McCarthy. Not a single Democrat voted in favor of keeping him as House speaker. Do you want to know why? Blackmail & Capitulation. Republicans & Dems do not control the government. The US Military under COG/JAG does. Read the Law of War Manual people. Washington DC was deemed foreign occupied territory. We are still under National Emergency. Executive Order 13912 made D. Trump a War Time president. D. Trump literally stated this at a rally. Why do you think I posted the info about the EPA Ruling? People, there is such a thing as a conservative Democrat and a Liberal Republican. Stop thinking we need everything to be in name in order to get bills or policies passed. That is no longer the case today. K. McCarthy being ousted by both parties should have told you that.

AAnon55
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 2:36 PM
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 3:58 PM

@AAnon55 - 𝙰 𝙰𝚗𝚘𝚗

Former IRS Agent Sherry Jackson There was a $50,000 prize for the person that could find the federal income tax law. She couldn't find it. https://t.co/RDm6vRApr9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sherry Peel Jackson, a former IRS agent and CPA, discovered that there is no law and that the IRS is the biggest fraud. She researched and found that no one could identify the section of the Internal Revenue Code that makes a typical worker liable for income tax. She also learned about the non-enforcement pocket commission she had as an administrative clerk. Sherry realized that the Federal Reserve is not federal and that income tax does not go towards running the country. She exposed these truths and educated people about the system. She emphasized the need to unite and understand what is happening with our money.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sherry Peel Jackson. She is an ex IRS agent, CPA, fraud examiner. She was working for the IRS. She was on a fast track to success there. She was doing very well, had received numerous awards for all of the work She did. And she realized that there is no law and that the biggest fraud was the IRS. Speaker 1: The USA Today, it was July 7, 2000. And it says, dear, we the people. Most citizens are not required to file an income tax return. The 16th amendment So the constitution is a fraud and if you file, you waive your 5th Amendment right. I said, okay, that's another stuff she was saying. Now, this is a lot of reading. But I kept reading because I was very interested. You know, being a CPA and into fraud and all that. I wanna see what was going on. So here in the 3rd column, It says no one has been able to collect the $50,000 reward offered by Bill Conklin to anyone that can identify the section of the Internal Revenue Code that makes a Typical worker liable for the income tax. Serious about winning is $50,000. Okay. So I was at my desk. Basically, I just showed everything off my desk And got the codes out, the regulations out, the tax card, I got on the internet, look at the Cornell University site, all these different things and I started researching. And 2 weeks later, I said to myself, Oh my goodness. We have a problem here. It doesn't look like I'm gonna win this money. And I was sitting there at my desk thinking, this is this thing is a fraud. 2 weeks, it took me to sit there and and realize that. I didn't just look at the positive, I looked at the negative, I looked at the IRS site. All these things are going on. This thing is a fraud. Being being a CPA and a former IRS agent, I sat there at the desk, you know, I was by myself and all these thoughts started going going through my head. The first thought was, Now, finally, open up the codes and regulations. Because here at the IRS, they trained us with these little guys. We didn't use the codes and regulations. We would get one of these and you would have to read it, understand it, and pass this little test. And all these little guys that I got, I read them and I I made a's on all my tests. And I thought and I guess the rest of the agents in training thought that the information that was in here was the same that was in those stick codes and regulations. But it's not necessarily the same. The things that are in these training manuals are not necessarily the same thing as in codes and regulations. I learned that in my studying. In the time that I was doing the research, I also learned about the pocket commission. And I'm gonna let this go around the room, but y'all gotta give it back. This is The outside that I purchased was the pocket commission that I had. And before I left, I had to sense the line and make a copy. This is the little badge I used to flip out of people and say, give me your books and records. Give me your bank statements. Give me all your credit cards, you know. And, you know, people okay. Here. You know, even the counties. I go to the county, do it. I go just about anywhere and flip this little thing out and get whatever I want. You know? There's a lot of power nuts out there doing that, guys. Y'all know it. Half of you already know about it. There's an enforcement pocket commission, and there's a non enforcement pocket commission. And I started looking back at this thing. It has SER, Southeast Region. First of all, I'll read it. It has My picture up here, and it says, Sherry Jackson, whose signature and picture appear above is duly commissioned as internal revenue agent And has authority to perform all duties conferred upon such officers under all laws and regulations administered by the Internal Revenue Service, including the authority to investigate And require and receive information as to all matters relating to such laws and regulations. And it has SER and some other numbers and an a. And based on this Internal Revenue Manual, a means administrative. So I'm an administrative clerk Out there on the front lines. And I'm an administrative clerk with a non enforcement pocket commission. Okay. So I'm starting to get angry here. So when I think about all the, I had to take bribes and get little tape recorders taped to my body and The little microphones on me and going to take bribes from people. But, you know, thinking about stuff like that, you know what? They kept me out here. I'm thinking I really have authority. And this is administrative. Administrative non enforcement pocket commission. That was one of the other things I thought about. And then, I thought about and I found out, this is this is one of the another issue, a levy versus a notice of levy. This is something that I didn't deal with a lot, Because I was an agent and I just assessed the tax. I didn't I wasn't a tax collector. I just assessed it. So this is a notice of levy. And someone said, hey, This is a notice of levy. This is what the banks get or your your job or whatever. They said, look at the back of it. So, I'm looking at the back of this notice of levy and it says, Section 6331, levy and distraint. And then, it says, B and C. And I'm thinking, it starts off with B? What happened to a? So I looked up a, and here's a. And it says, levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, Sir, employ or elected official of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of United States or the District of Columbia by serving a notice of living. I'm thinking, but that's not most people. That's not the person that works at AT and T or Bell South or Coca Cola. That's not most people. Are people noticing that the a isn't on here? Aren't they aren't they curious about it? Why are they doing this? All this is going through my head during this period of time, then I'm realizing that there's there's a red in the can. That's what Call it. But this is the the straw that broke the camel's back. The Federal Reserve is not Federal. How many of you did not know before today that the Federal Reserve isn't Federal? If you didn't don't be shy. If you didn't know before today that the Federal Reserve isn't federal, raise your hand. Most people don't know that. 9 out of 10 people that I asked off the street Don't understand that the Federal Reserve is a non auditable private banking cartel. So this is what my decision was. And I went on and started educating people. One of the things that people ask me once I've made this decision and started talking about it, how we're gonna run the country without the income tax? I don't know how much Dan got into it. But the Grace Commission report that Ronald Reagan put out in 1994 84, sorry, Says that none of the money collected in income tax goes towards running the country. But the bottom line is it's not going towards running the country. So you patriotic people out there, you've been fooled. Beardsley Rummel, he was Federal Reserve Chairman back in 1946. Did a speech before the American Bar Association. The title of his speech was taxes for revenue are obsolete. Within the body of this report, he says that the taxes, the income taxes for distribution of WIL. What is redistribution of wealth? What is that? That's taking from me that I've worked hard for and given it from somebody else to somebody else. Shouldn't I have the right to redistribute my wealth if I want to? Another question that they ask me is, how come I haven't Heard this on TV. Is it? On the radio. Right. Or in the newspaper. Well sweetie, the simple answer to that is, The same people who own the television stations and the newspapers and the radio stations are the same people who are involved with the Federal Reserve. And here is a little statement that says that it only requires 5% ownership to significantly influence the media. Rockefeller is one of the original shareholders of the Federal Reserve. As early as 1963, the House Banking subcommittee reported that Rockefeller, through Chase Manhattan Bank, controlled 5.9% of the stock in CBS And the bank, and gained interlocking directorates with ABC. I went all the way through high school, all the way through college, all the way through Testing for the CPA and all this IRS training and didn't hear about any of this. You think they want this information out here? For you Guys to eat up and chew up and find out what's really going on. I don't think so. Now, another one. Why why don't we just tell our elected officials about this? Okay. And to make a really long story short, the We The People Foundation, the same people that put out this ad, Put together a hearing. And these 40 researchers, we're gonna ask the IRS and the DOJ these questions. And we're gonna have this big meeting in Washington called the Truth and Taxation Hearings. Okay? So we got together with 537 questions. So we sent them the 537 questions so they could research and have the answers. And what did they do? They reneged on coming. They signed off on it, but they reneged on coming. So you all didn't get to hear the truth. We went on and had the hearings anyway, put it on CD, Marched around Washington, giving it to all 5 35 congressmen and senators. Please look at this information. We got stupid responses back like, thank you for visiting our offices in Washington. The next time you come from Washington, come to Washington, please visit us again. They don't care. Your presidents don't care. Another one that they ask me, or they'll say something like, well, this just sounds like it's some kind of conspiracy theory. Y'all hear that a lot? Okay. Well, tell me this. What's the difference between a conspiracy and a strategy? Don't you understand that this is all by design? All this black, white stuff. You're white. I'm black, you know. You're Democrat. I'm a Republican. You know, y'all heard of divide and conquer before. Right? Yeah. Why y'all letting us you're letting them do it to us? While I'm sitting up here arguing with this man about what his great great great granddaddy did Mine. There's this big old fence closing in around us. And while I'm sitting here wasting time and he's sitting here telling me why We need to put our heads together and figure out how to get out of the fence that these people are building around us. Divide and conquer, we can't let that work anymore. It's been working all these years. Then we need to get together and understand. First of all, you need to understand what is going on with your money. You work hard. It's like we're on a hamster. We're a hamster on a wheel.
AAnon55
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 9:58 PM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 11:37 AM

@AAnon55 - 𝙰 𝙰𝚗𝚘𝚗

[Former IRS Enforcement Officer John Turner] A truther challenged John to find the federal income tax law. 'He couldn't find it'... https://t.co/Ft1NTCPJd2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker initially believed that there was a law requiring people to file tax returns, but after researching for three and a half months, they couldn't find a clear statute that made a person liable. They realized that the government collects taxes to generate revenue, but they were unaware of the complexities involved. The speaker attended a meeting where someone argued that the IRS lacks authority, but they initially dismissed it as taking things out of context. However, after a conversation with the person, the speaker agreed to research the matter further. They delved into the Internal Revenue Code and found sections that seemed relevant but didn't provide a clear answer. The speaker's research led them to question their own authority to enforce tax laws, ultimately leading to their resignation. They discovered that the Internal Revenue Manual restricts enforcement due to constitutional issues. The speaker believes that if more people knew about the government's methods, they would stop filing tax returns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to it. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable. People have asked me, well, how what would make a guy wanna collect taxes for the federal government? And, I reasoned that the government Had bills to pay, that it needed revenue. After all, it's the law of the land. Everybody knows you gotta pay your taxes, And that's what we're told. Right? I had no idea what I was getting into. I just was being, a good husband and meeting their request from my presence that night. And, this man who did the talking that night, he was not the man on the audio tape. He was somebody else who had come over. There was a business angle associated with this somewhere, and that was the draw for the ladies to to pull me there and have Let me evaluate the whole thing. Sort out the fact from the fiction and the why IRS is involved with this business opportunity. And I was very leery, but I just went. And so I'm sitting on the front row, about where this gentleman is and the man was Not up on a podium like this. He was down right at my feet. And he proceeded to spend several minutes telling this audience why The IRS doesn't have authority to do this and to do that. Where's the law? There's no law that requires Americans to file paying tax. Blah blah blah blah. Oh, Federal Reserve blah blah blah. He's ranting and raving and going on and on. And I'm sitting there. I get start slumping down in my chair, you know, I'm getting tense. You're not, Yeah. Steam come out my ears, twitching in my temples and around this that part of my face. You know, I was not very happy with What he was saying, I thought that I didn't know, but I just thought this guy looks like a sincere guy. He sounds very sincere. He Police and what he's saying? He's not gonna get up here and tell a room full of people all these things and not have some convictions. So I didn't think he was stupid or a dummy or just a liar. Well I thought this guy like a lot of these tax protesters has taken things out of context. You know, he's he's taking little snippets of the law, and he's just taking court cases or whatever. He strung them all together, and he's He's made it say what he wants it to say because he doesn't like paying taxes. That's what was going through my mind as I was listening to him. Well, he asked those who had to leave early because of babysitter commitments and and whatever to he said that, you know, they could leave. And he said if you can others can stay around, you wanna ask questions, get a refreshment and hang around. Let's let's talk. So when everybody went to get cookies. I talked with him 1 on 1 for a few minutes. And my questions, as you might not be surprised, were a little bit Intense and and pointed and direct in my responses to his answers. And then my wife and sister-in-law are standing right behind me Listening to this conversation, they see it going like this. You know? Nowhere. That she says, you know, she's thinking, you guys are not communicating. Nobody's relating. So she gently pokes me in the rib cage and whispers in my ear. And she says, Tell them who you work for and what what you do for a living because he's not you know, you're not relating to him. He doesn't know where you're coming from. But I thought, you know what? My little wife is right. This conversation is going nowhere. And I'm either just gonna might as well walk away from him and wash my hands of it or try to relate to them. So I told them and he kinda went his response was like this. He just barely blinked. He, he, recovered very well from that sudden, disclosure on my part of who I worked for and what I did. After all the things he had said that night. And then something very interesting was about to happen. And I We'll always commend him for the way that he responded. Instead of arguing with me, instead of, Pounding his chest and telling me where I was wrong or being contentious at all, he said, you know, he says, have you ever on your own, Just personal. You know, not as part of the government agent, but just on your own. Have you ever researched for yourself, you know, the law And and other things, resources to to to find out if the things I said tonight are wrong, and then you just shut up. He's a sales guy. He knows that old sales thing that, you know, the 1st guy that talks when you're in the closure part of the sales thing loses. And I I'm not a sales guy, but I knew I know enough about it that I knew where he was going with there with that, and I felt very uncomfortable on it. So I admitted, well, no. I have And he said well, he said, I've been talking to you here for a few minutes and obviously working for the IRS, You clearly have access to the law. You've gotta have access to it. It is is that true? I mean, don't you isn't there a law library somewhere in the Sacramento office and Don't you have a law on your desk somewhere? I said, yeah. I do. They said, well, I've been talking to you for a few minutes here. You seem reasonably intelligent, to me. He said, I'm guessing that you probably could Do some reading and studies and and and figure out the answers to some of these questions. Is that correct, Nisha? And I'm thinking, yeah. Yeah. I think I could. And then he said, And then was his clincher. He said, so I got a question for you. He said, if you if if you're reasonably intelligent and you have access to the law and you just You've never personally verified these things for yourself and yet you're telling me I'm wrong It says, do you have an open mind? Do you have the desire to take some time, whatever time you need, And research it out and get back with me. Show me where I'm wrong. Then you shut up. Now the pressure's really on. My wife insists we're all back there. A few more people gather around. And I'm and I'm thinking, This sounds like work. I'm just a government employee. The guy is right. He's being sincere. He's not badgering me. He's not being contentious. He's asking me Reasoned questions. Valid questions. Plus, I was so cocky. I was so confident. I said, you got it. And I'm thinking this is gonna be a slam dunk. I've been enforcing this law for nearly 10 years And this turkey, you know, wants an answer? No problem. I'll go research it and I'll lay it out for him and that'll be the end of that. Boy, was I not used? So off I went that night with a verbal commitment to him to to give him, my professional, my Personal opinion sometime in the near future. I started I had my personal my my copy of the Internal Revenue Code that was issued to me by by the IRS. And, I gotta confess to you, I I read it a lot more from that day forward to this date than I ever did for those 10 years working for them. So here here we are looking at section 1, Tax imposed. Subtitle a of this this thing called the law. And and it says right there at the beginning, section 1, tax imposed. Big, Bold letters and, you know, I go, well, what's this guy's problem? Here it is, man. It says right in the beginning, here's where taxes imposed. Paragraph 8. Married individuals filing joint returns and surviving spouses. There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of Every married individual as defined in section 7703 who makes a single return jointly with his spouse under section 6013 and Blah blah blah blah blah blah. And it keeps going. I said, what's this guy's problem? There it is. Now I said, wait a minute. Let me read this again. There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of those guys who make us a return. I said, wait a minute. That's not exactly the statute that identifies, you know, clearly who's liable. Just It says it says those who file returns become liable. But, okay, well, maybe that's not all all the, All the answer. So, you know, who wants to read a book like this? It's, You know, it's confusing. There's places where it's vague. There's definitions that don't necessarily mean the same thing as what The terms that we use in everyday language, there, there's all kinds of things about it that besides the, the sheer volume of it, how big it is, That make most people not want to, pick it up and read it, understandably. So I I started, I kept going and I got to the section there under subtitle f, procedure administration, you know, 6000 section 6,001 That talks about, every person liable for any tax imposed by this title or for the collection thereof shall keep such records. And then it goes on and says some other things and it says, The only records which an employer shall be required to keep under this section, I'm thinking, what does that have to do with an employer? In connection with charge tips shall be charge receipts, records necessary to comply, blah, blah, blah. So that really didn't, tell me the exact answer even though it was flirting with it. They keep flirting with it. It's talking about, you know, liable And imposed and everything, but it really didn't quite say it. Section 6011, general requirement of a return statement or list. When required by regulations prescribed by the secretary, any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title Shall make a return or statement and it goes on to talk about regulations. So I said, well, that boy, Sure sounds like it, but, you know, the more I read it carefully and and properly as you should, I'm not an attorney, but I And let me just digress for a second. Back when that gentleman challenged me to do this research, I decided that if I was going to waste my time doing it, invest my time doing this On my own instead of playing golf every night, which is what I like to do, I might as well do my best effort to put aside my preconceived notions, All my beliefs and all the training the IRS gave me about income tax, tax protester, illegal tax protesters, the whole 9 yards. I thought, Okay. I don't know if I can do it, but I'm gonna try. I'm gonna try to be open minded and objective. So I'm trying to look at this not through A real narrow, lens, but I'm trying to look at it in terms of this guy, what he said, and why he wanted me to take some time to show him wrong. So you Flip over the page 6012 of the code. Persons required to make returns of income. You know? So you read that. General, Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount except that a return should not be required of an individual, and it goes on, blah, blah, blah, law law law. And I just thought, oh, this is it. But there were some more things that I needed to do. And I'm not gonna Go on and on here and bore you with all those details, but and some of you have probably made the same study for yourselves to come to your own conclusions. But by the time you get through the definitions of certain terms and go back to these places in the code, you you start having some problems. It starts breaking down and that's what happened to me. In fact, you heard of this thing called cognitive dissonance? Well, several weeks into this, things were not meeting. And it seemed like every time I Picked up a rock and looked under it for some good information. It was wormy and and nasty and and cold and muddy. And I thought, you know, I I just gotta keep turning over rocks and I'll find the answer. And instead, I just kept getting the wrong answers for what I expected to have happened. Well, I started having some internal kinda like a bellyache. You know? I started feeling really bad. I thought, why is this not so clear That's crystal clear. And more studies and now visits to the law library. Eventually visits with People in the so called tax movement who were, you know, vocal and outspoken about their position that People who are mostly not required to, to file income tax returns and I found them to be very accessible. I was kinda surprised about that. I was still working for IRS. I whipped out my commission. I said, look. I'm not pulling your Like, I really worked with these guys, but I wanna know. I'm not here they didn't send me. I'm here on my own volition. I'd like to know. I'd sit down. They'd spend 2 hours of their own time. I take notes. They give me some of their materials, and they'd speak at seminars or whatnot. After 2 hours, they, you know, have to leave or something. They'd say, well, good luck. And I'd walk out like this, you know, with all kinds of homework. Return. And I kept thinking, well, okay. I'm gonna get to the bottom of this. Instead of getting finding the law, I couldn't find the law. I found lots of Sections of the law that looked like it was the one that I needed, but I never could find the correct one that made it clear. And at some point in time, like the end of March 1997, because I started this in the beginning of, 8 of 97, I was unable to, in good conscious, go out and file notices of levy, send out notices of levy to people's employers, Their bank accounts, call tow truck drivers and have them seize people's automobiles right out of their driveway or worse yet While they're at work and they come out and their car's gone, they don't even know what happened. Just an empty parking space there. I did those things, like I said earlier, with a good conscience based on what I knew and believed Before I came across this information, when all of a sudden I realized that I didn't have the proper authority to do this, I had some serious problems internally going on with me. You know, my mind was shaking. I I couldn't believe that the government would Create such a fantastic hoax and make it look so tight and so required. And then for all these 80 years, they put people in jail and they, take their property. Clearly, they have the authority to do this. All these attorneys in our land, all these CPs, and all these These people wouldn't let this happen if it wasn't clear authorized and proper. And so here I was, all of a sudden, with the inability to rectify by this. And the only answer I had for myself was to resign. I did not make a big fanfare. I did not even tell my employer The reasons why I resigned. I was very shocked till later, years later, when I was doing my research to come across this little Part this little snippet in this lesson on 60 20 b. Listen to this. The IRM now the IRM is the Internal Revenue Manual. That's not the law. It's not the regulations. It's just guidelines, procedural guidelines for employees in in in how to do their job. The IRM restricts the broad delegation shown in the and it points to this copy of the of the delegation order that they gave us. For revenue officers to employment, excise, and partnership tax returns are you ready for this? Because of constitutional issues. Because of constitutional issues. Why we didn't question that all of this in that training classroom At that time, I don't know. Except that we in terms of our attitude and our motivations, we weren't questioning whether this was legal or proper or any Any of those things, we just were learning how to do the job. And then it says in parentheses, you have already studied auto referrals as a means to enforce. Look at that word, enforce. Return. And they give you a non enforcement pocket commission. You've already studied the lesson on auto referrals as a means to enforce compliance on income tax returns. And there's another lesson, separate one from this one, that is that lesson. And it makes no mention of the statute. No mention of any delegation orders. No mention of any requirement. There's a a huge body of knowledge to explain just How they are able to pull this off and get away with it. And, folks, the bottom line is, if people knew what I know, What I'm telling people about with regard to this substitute return business, this misapplication of Code section 6020 b. If they knew what I know, how the government pulls this off, they would stop filing their returns because they would realize what a fraud it is, how the government, how IRS is limited in their ability. Folks, I'm telling you, the Government has no legal mechanism in place, never has had, to get a tax assessment return.
myhiddenvalue
Posted - January 14, 2024 at 1:30 AM
Saved - January 15, 2024 at 1:38 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Federal Reserve Notes are not taxable! How do you tax a debt? https://t.co/ZewmK1AyM0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Federal Reserve notes are not taxable income because they are a debt. The 10.40 bonds were used to support the war effort, and although people invested in them, they were not guaranteed to get their money back. The IRS originated from the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms agency in Puerto Rico and is not part of the US government. By law, we are only supposed to pay taxes to support essential governmental services, but the current system forces us to pay for more than what we actually receive. This is like being forced to pay for 18,000 hamburgers when there are only 19 listed on the menu.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Federal Reserve notes. Again, those dollars you have in your wallet are not taxable income. Listen closely. They're not. How do you tax a debt? You don't make any income. Do you guys even know where the 10.40 came from? 40 bonds. Lincoln, the 10 40 bonds. You guys watch my videos. The 10 40 bonds. Police support the war effort. I want you to consider it as a gift because the the government is broke, and you may never get paid on those bonds, but please invest. We need the money to fund the war our effort, and Americans stepped up the plate and funded the 10.40 bonds far more than they ever thought no American got his investment back, and Lincoln told them they probably wouldn't. Honest aid. At least he offered a little bit of fair and honest closure, but the 10 forties never quit. And you sign it, you fill it out, and you sign it under the pains and penalties of perjury by voluntary compliance. You hear that? You're gonna volunteer for that shit. Stop consenting. President Trump said anything. That's something I've always done, that I've been good at. Where'd the IRS come from? The Internal Revenue Service. Where'd they come from? Listen up. They came out of the alcohol, tobacco, firearms, which is now ATFE because they added explosives. That's where IRS came from. Where did that come from? It was a registered sure corporation out of Puerto Rico. The IRS has never been part of the United States government ever. Yep. Is there a third party debt collector? And not $1 that goes to the IRS and the 10 40 funds US government. That's right. You wanna shut them down, cut off the funding. The only taxes we're supposed to pay by law, and I'm happy to pay them because we're supposed to pay them to support those 19 essential governmental services we contracted for. Okay. Let's just use a dumb example because that's all I can come up with. If you walk into a hamburger store, and there's 19 hamburgers listed there, but there's about 18,000 the handed you a whole bunch of the others, and then they pulled out their gun, and they forced you at gunpoint to pay for everything. How would you feel? That's what they do. Yep.
absirdguy
Posted - July 8, 2024 at 6:13 PM
Saved - July 8, 2024 at 8:36 PM

@absirdguy - CatManDooDoo

@OliLondonTV America's tax system in action https://t.co/dAz4vtTGmX

Video Transcript AI Summary
They are teaching people how to safely sniff dope, which is self-destructive. They provide straws, razors, and scoops for drug use. This behavior is concerning and needs to be addressed. Translation: The video discusses the dangerous practice of teaching people how to safely use drugs like cocaine. Drug paraphernalia such as straws, razors, and scoops are provided for this purpose, which is alarming.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I don't know if they I guess they're trying to teach you how to be safe with sniffing dope. Or how the hell is they teaching you how to be safe with sniffing dope when it's all self destruction, mental destruction? That's right. And they give out now what the hell is going on here? I don't know. Y'all tell me. Think about numerous straws. We give out straws. This is for you to put your dope on. They go to hell. Something for you to put your dope on. The razor to chop it up. They give you a razor to chop the shit up. Feel like you the blood. They get you a scoop for the little old school dope sniffers that used to do it on the
joey_coniglio
Posted - October 22, 2024 at 12:03 AM
Saved - October 22, 2024 at 2:50 AM

@joey_coniglio - Joseph Coniglio

@TheOfficial1984 We should all convert to Amish. No birth certificates, no social security number, can’t be drafted, exempt from paying FICA tax.

Stormielady918
Posted - November 27, 2024 at 4:45 PM
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 10:24 AM

@Stormielady918 - Jessica

@VivekGRamaswamy Agreed. Defund it entirely. It’s nothing more than a banking mafia organization that has been instilling fear and stealing money from the American people for 100 years. IRS has no jurisdiction over Americans! https://t.co/txhvvx9Qpf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four counts of not filing his income tax prompted a question: could someone be innocent and still not file? "In the federal government, it is not a felony not to file taxes." After moving the case to the state, they called IRS Agent Kraner. The defense noted, "I never wrote anything down," even as video showed him taking notes. Mr. Harrell asked, "You show me the law that requires me to file a tax return and I'll be glad to do it," and, "what is the section... what act are we discussing here when I am liable to do these things that you claim I'm liable to do?" Jurors concluded "there is no law" and asked, "Where is the law? Show me the law." The judge promised the law but there was none. Bannister and Kuglund cases followed with acquittals: "24 people were criminally charged by the IRS because they claimed there was no law requiring them to file an income tax return." The jury acquitted all.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He was being tried for four counts of not filing his income tax. And our question was, well, what is to decide? Either he did or he didn't. It never occurred to us that he might actually be innocent while at the same time not filing. In the federal government, it is not a felony not to file taxes. Finally, they said, Okay, if we're going to get this guy, we're going to have to put it in the state. They called up the IRS agent, Agent Kraner. Speaker 1: Kraner? Yeah. Robert Kraner. This Speaker 2: is Ken Dougherty who's also an investigator with the Speaker 1: Lions Department of Roadmap. There's a request for a copy of the delegation of the Speaker 2: authority order. Right. And I talked to my boss about that and he said that my badge is that. Speaker 1: Badge is in the authority. Speaker 0: The last question that the defense asked him was, Did you write any of this down? And Agent Kraner looked right at him and right at us and he said, I never wrote anything down. And yet when we saw the video, there he was writing notes. So I'm thinking, Okay, at this point the judge is supposed to say, Agent Kraner, it is clear that you have committed perjury. It wasn't even noticed. It finally came to the climax. Mr. Harrell looked right at the prosecutor and he said, I will tell you the same thing I have told over and over again to government officials. You show me the law that requires me to file a tax return and I'll be glad to do it. Speaker 1: And, again, I have under your father's requirement that you claim and I'm required to do so. And the requirement under the regulations is what section? My question to you is what particular act are we discussing here when I am liable to do these things that you claim I'm liable to do? Speaker 2: Your exact question would be again? Okay, what is the section that what? But I guess I'm still not understanding your question, mister Harold. Speaker 1: Well, you must be familiar with what did you that you had the police powers to enforce. Speaker 0: The prosecutor absolutely ignored him. And he started slandering mister Harrell. Just started attacking his character. Speaker 3: They're calling us tax chiefs. They're calling us fanatics. They're calling us weirdos. I don't care what you call me, but I have one question. Where is the law? Show me the law. Speaker 4: I can't let this turn into a rational debate because if they do, they Speaker 5: lose it. So they have to insult people and say it's frivolous. Speaker 0: We felt like that there was an overall arrogance and that they were railroading mister Harrell and wanting us to participate. Judge Coogan, he looked right at us and he said, I will instruct the jury according to the law. We were sent to deliberation. The judge promised us that he would give us the law. And we looked and we looked and it was not there. We wrote a note to the judge asking for a copy of the law. Ten minutes later, we get a note back. You have everything you need. But there was no law. And he had promised us. At that point I felt betrayed. I felt like this man promised us the law and that's what this whole thing is about, the law. We request it, and he still denies us the law. Speaker 6: And the reason they didn't do it was why? Speaker 0: Because there is no law. Remember, we're talking about the Illinois state law here, which is a law in Illinois. So we got out that law and we read it several times and I said, Okay, wait, wait, wait. You know, because they kept saying, But this is a law in Illinois. And I said, Look at the beginning of the It says, Anyone required to file a federal income tax return is required to file an Illinois tax return. I said, If it is true that he's not required to file a federal return, then that nullifies the Illinois law. Two people kept saying, But he's going to get by with it. And I said, What is he getting by with but his rights? If there is no law, he's not breaking a law. He's just standing on his rights. Are we going to deny him that? That's when this one juror sat back and kinda rolled his eyes and he said, you mean we don't have to pay taxes? All of a sudden we realized that this trial was much bigger and the ramifications of this trial were going to be so broad if it actually got out. I mean, it's like we had just discovered this great government secret. And so when we came out for the delivering of the verdict, the judge was, I'm sure, even at this point, I'm sure he still thought we would pass given guilty verdict. And the reason I say that is because of the look on his face when the first not guilty was read. His face just turned white. I mean, it's like, I don't believe this. The second time, you could hear people out in the audience, just in the courtroom, you know, just going, Wow! You know? And the judge is just getting red in the face and he was just livid. And the judge got up and left. I sat there and I thought, This truly is a victory for the people. And I have never felt more patriotic. And I knew that we had done the right thing. I looked at that man, Mr. Harrell, and I thought the system might not work all the time. But this time, for that man, it did. Speaker 6: In November 2004, the government arrested former IRS criminal investigator Joe Bannister. They charged him with fraud for telling the American people the truth about the income tax laws. The jury obviously agreed with Joe. Speaker 1: Well, it just showed mister Bannister to be honest and straightforward and working within the law. Speaker 6: Vernice Kuglund, a federal express pilot, claimed there was no law requiring Americans to file an income tax. She also won in court. 24 people were criminally charged by the IRS because they claimed there was no law requiring them to file an income tax return. Speaker 1: The fact is neither the judge nor the prosecutor nor the IRS could bring that statute in there because it's not in the books. The jury came back with an acquittal for everyone.
BehizyTweets
Posted - November 28, 2024 at 12:15 AM
Saved - November 28, 2024 at 8:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'll always remember when President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador called out America's taxation system. He pointed out that we pay high taxes, but it feels like we're just maintaining an illusion of funding the government. I believe President Trump could be the one to break this cycle of taxation slavery.

@BehizyTweets - George

I will never forget when El Salvador President Nayib Buekele exposed America's taxation scam. "The real problem is that you pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not. It's shocking, but it's true." President Trump can become the president that ends our vicious taxation slavery cycle forever.

Video Transcript AI Summary
High taxes in the U.S. are often blamed for financial issues, but the real problem lies in how the government is funded. While taxes are high, they don't truly finance the government. Instead, the government relies on treasury bonds, primarily purchased by the Federal Reserve, which prints money to buy them. This creates an illusion of funding through taxes, but in reality, the government is financed by money printed out of thin air. If people understood this, confidence in the dollar could collapse, leading to severe consequences for Western civilization. Urgent policy changes are needed to prevent a financial crisis similar to past mistakes. There’s still time to act before the situation worsens.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I talk to my conservative friends right here, they always tell me that the problem is high taxes, but they're wrong. Of course, high taxes are extremely high here in the United States. I I give you that. You're right in that, but that's not the real problem. The real problem is not the high taxes themselves, but the fact that they are not even really funding the government. Not even those high taxes, higher than a lot of places in the world, not even those taxes are really funding the government. So who's financing the government? Government is financed by treasury bonds, paper, and who buys the treasury bonds? Mostly the fed. And how does the fed buy them? By printing money. But what backing does the Fed have for that money being printed? The Treasury bonds themselves. So, basically, you finance the government by printing money out of thin air. Someone could ask someone could ask, well, so if the government can print the limited amounts of money out of thin air, why did they collect taxes? I mean, in theory, it would make sense. Right? If they can print unlimited amounts of money, why would they need taxes for? The answer is simple, but it's very shocking. The real problem is that you pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not. It's shocking, but it's true. The government is funded by money printing, paper backed with paper, a bubble that will inevitably inevitably burst. The situation is even worse than it seems because if most Americans and the rest of the world were to become aware of these bars, confidence in your currency would be lost, the dollar will fall, and the Western civilization with it. If the next president of the United States doesn't make the necessary policies and structural changes, sooner or later, that bubble will burst. There's still time. You don't have to make the same mistakes we did in the sixties seventies. You can still jump before the water boils.
36_cia7
Posted - December 27, 2024 at 6:05 PM
Saved - July 15, 2025 at 4:53 AM

@36_cia7 - 36CIA(💕紫游）

@jasper_truth And Law make American pay tax https://t.co/rgzqFfo4yU

Video Transcript AI Summary
After the Federal Government lost its ability to issue its own money, the national debt soared because the government had to pay the Federal Reserve interest on all currency printed. This interest on the national debt could never be repaid, as the Federal Reserve required all debts to be repaid with gold, which the government did not have. The interest portion of the national debt was not issued into the money supply, so more debt would have to be issued to service the growing interest payments on all loans. To cover this interest payment, Congress passed the income tax legislation, which became law in 1913 with the ratification of the sixteenth amendment. Initially, they levied a 1% voluntary tax on all incomes over 3,000 and a progressive surtax on all incomes over 20,000.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After the Federal Government lost its ability to issue its own money, the national debt soon soared to astronomical heights because now the government had to pay the Federal Reserve interest on all currency printed to circulation. But this interest on the national debt could never be repaid, as the Federal Reserve required all debts to be repaid with gold which the government did not have. And even worse, the interest portion of the national debt was not issued into the money supply. In other words, more and more debt would have to be issued to continue servicing the growing interest payments on all loans. In order to cover this interest payment, Congress was forced to pass the income tax legislation, which became law in 1913 with the ratification of the sixteenth amendment, also known as the income tax amendment. Initially, they levied a 1% voluntary tax on all incomes over 3,000 and a progressive surtax on all incomes over 20,000.
WallStreetApes
Posted - January 14, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 7:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I announced The ERS, aiming to abolish the IRS. In my first video, I explained that our income tax exists because US politicians are influenced by foreign countries. In the second video, El Salvador's President Bukele stated that the IRS and high taxes are unnecessary, claiming they only maintain the illusion of funding the government.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Donald Trump announces The ERS, External Revenue Service. The next step is to Abolish The IRS 1st Video) Trump reveals the only reason we’re paying an income tax in America is because US Politicians are paid off by foreign countries 2nd Video) El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele says The IRS and excessive American Tax System are COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY “You pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 1900s, the U.S. shifted from tariffs to an income tax due to pressure from other countries. Politicians were influenced by these nations, which affected economic decisions. A commission was formed in 1887 to address the surplus wealth from tariffs on foreign goods. The U.S. thrived by taxing imports, which protected American jobs. This situation mirrors China's approach, where foreign companies can operate if they build factories there, unlike the restrictions on U.S. cars. Elon Musk exemplifies this dynamic, successfully establishing operations in China, showcasing the complexities of international trade and investment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Unless they pay a big price, and the big price is tariffs. And he'd speak like that, but he was right. And then around in the early 1900, they switched over stupidly to, frankly, an income tax. And you know why? Because countries were putting a lot of pressure on America. We don't wanna pay tariffs. Please don't you you know, they believe me. They control our politicians. If you look at the kind of numbers that these guys make, then and now. But we had a commission meeting in the, 8 I think it was 18/87. Think of this problem. We were so rich. We had so much money. We didn't know what to do. So they set up a blue ribbon commission on tariffs. And these sole purposes, what to do with all the money we had. We were so rich because we were taxing other people for coming in and taking our jobs. And China does it. That's what China did. If you want to open a factory and sell cars if you build a factory here or have a factory they don't take our cars. They they wouldn't take our cars. But if you build a plant in China, you can do that. Elon did that. By the way, Elon is great. That guy is such a great guy. I think you're a fan of Elon. He is from a different planet. He's the greatest guy. That rocket coming at
Video Transcript AI Summary
The financial situation in the United States is misunderstood. High taxes are often blamed, but they don't truly fund the government. Instead, the government relies on Treasury bonds, primarily purchased by the Federal Reserve, which prints money to buy them. This creates an illusion that taxes are necessary for funding. In reality, the government is financed by money printing, leading to a precarious bubble that could burst. If the public realizes this, confidence in the dollar could collapse, threatening Western civilization. Urgent policy changes are needed to prevent repeating past mistakes and to stabilize the economy before it's too late.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For instance, the financial situation of the United States. When I talk to my conservative friends right here, they always tell me that the problem is high taxes, that they're wrong. Of course, high taxes are extremely high here in the United States. I I give you that. You're right in that, but that's not the real problem. The real problem is not the high taxes themselves, but the fact that they are not even really funding the government. But even those high taxes, higher than a lot of places in the world, not even those taxes are really funding the government. So who's financing the government? Government is financed by Treasury bonds, paper. And who buys the Treasury bonds? Mostly the Fed. And how does the Fed buy them? By printing money. But what backing does the Fed have for that money being printed? The treasury bonds themselves. So, basically, you finance the government by printing money out of thin air. Someone could ask someone could ask, well, so if the government can print a limited amounts of money out of thin air, why did they collect taxes? I mean, in theory, it would make sense. Right? If they can put unlimited amounts of money, why would they need taxes for? The answer is simple, but it's very shocking. The real problem is that you pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not. It's shocking, but it's true. The government is funded by money printing, paper backed with paper, a bubble that will inevitably inevitably burst. The situation is even worse than it seems, because if most Americans and the rest of the world were to become aware of these bars, confidence in your currency will be lost, the dollar will fall, and the western civilization with it. If the next president of the United States doesn't make the necessary policies and structural changes, sooner or later, that bubble will burst. There's still time. You don't have to make the same mistakes we did in the sixties seventies. You can still jump before the water boils.
scrowder
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 5:59 AM

@scrowder - Steven Crowder

The IRS is terrified that YOUR dollars will be used to AUDIT them! Is anyone seeing this sh*t?! https://t.co/Ju8ZTFmaA1

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Doge targets USAID today, they might go after other agencies tomorrow, like the postal service or the IRS. There's a disconnect in our reactions; Chuck Schumer suggests that if they audit USAID, they could also audit the IRS or postal service. The IRS audits individuals, and there's a fear that your money could be used against them. Has anyone else noticed this?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Doge attacks USAID today, then you can be sure they'll move on to another target tomorrow. Speaker 1: Good. Speaker 0: Who knows? Maybe it'll be the postal service or the IRS. Speaker 1: You promise? I already supported. We cannot find common ground if we're saying the exact same thing with an entirely different visceral reaction. He, Chuck Schumer, is saying if they go after an audit the The USA AID USAID, they could possibly look at auditing with the IRS or the post service. And I'm going, hey, maybe we can audit the postal service or IRS. Think about how much they hate you. The IRS audits you. You, bitch. It audits you. And they're terrified that you, your dollars, could be used to audit them. Is anyone else seen this shit?

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Would you like @DOGE to audit the IRS?

CollinRugg
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 9:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just heard that DOGE workers are now engaging with the IRS, which Trump refers to as the "force of super-geniuses." He mentioned that the IRS will be treated like anyone else and that these workers are making an impact, leaving some people feeling tongue-tied during discussions.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

JUST IN: DOGE workers have been unleashed on the IRS, Trump says he calls them the "force of super-geniuses." "The Internal Revenue Service will be looked at like everybody else." "I call it the force of super-geniuses, but it's building. And, you know, they go up and they talk to some of the people about certain deals, and the people get all tongue-tied."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gavin Clager and others arrived at the IRS today. I don't expect to close the IRS, but I think the IRS will be looked at like everybody else. Just about everybody is going to be looked at. They're doing an amazing job. This force is building, and I call it the force of super geniuses. They go up and talk to people about certain deals, and the people get tongue-tied. They can't talk because these people get it. We need smart people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Those workers arrived today, Gavin Clager and others arrived today at the IRS. Do you expect to close the IRS? Or what are you expecting? Speaker 1: No, I don't expect it. But I think that the Internal Revenue Service will be looked at like everybody else. Just about everybody is going to be looked at. So it's they're doing a hell of a job. It's an amazing job they're doing. And that force is building these I call it the force of super geniuses, but it's building. And, you know, they go up and they talk to some of the people about certain deals and the people get all tongue tied. They can't talk because these people get it. They're very smart people. We need smart people.
RINOhunter1776
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 7:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed how America transitioned from a Public Trust to a municipality after the Civil War, allowing for the establishment of the Federal Reserve. This shift enabled a fraudulent system where our financial rights were undermined. I likened it to a Trust being mismanaged by its Trustees, leading to the embezzlement of funds. The government bypassed constitutional money systems, imposing taxes through Social Security, with the IRS acting as an enforcer for the Federal Reserve. Ultimately, the Federal Government became an administrator for international bankers, perpetuating a cycle of debt.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

How America was captured by International Bankers: We began as a Public Trust (nonprofit/charity), under the U.S. Constitution, that simply oversaw Commerce - and then post-Civil War and Reconstruction, D.C. was turned into a Municipality, creating a tangible "Federal" jurisdiction that could contract with other corporate fictions and take part in commercial agreements and transactions.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

D.C. became a separate commercial entity, clearing the way for the Nation's capture through the creation of the Federal Reserve... https://t.co/zzv0GNfRiK

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

Artful and designing men were meticulous in their planning, to ensure everything was done "legally" (on paper), but in substance, was completely fraudulent and dare I say, treasonous. https://t.co/ImXSyUd0Tz

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

Imagine if you created a Trust for your children and grandchildren to live prosperously under, and then, your very own Trustees created an LLC or corporate entity to act as an embezzlement vehicle for the Beneficiaries' (your posterity) funds - siphoning all their money to criminal partners under the guise of government services.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

They had to figure out a way to bypass a Constitutionally mandated money system (gold/silver) and turn it into a private script that would indebt the entire American population in their system of debt. How did they do this? Under the guise of an EMERGENCY (as usual). https://t.co/4GQJr1vcuw

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

The PEOPLE of these united States have the inherent natural right of enjoying the fruits of their labor/industry. Their PROPERTY is inherently theirs with no overlords to pay feudal dues to. So, how did the FedGovt find a way to tax the PEOPLE's earnings, directly -- the privilege of Social Security.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

The IRS is the bagman/enforcer and clearing house of the Federal Reserve. The Grace report, commissioned by Reagan, showed nearly ALL income tax simply pays the INTEREST on the National Debt & NOT the principal. & THEN OUR TRUSTEES BORROW MORE MONEY FROM THE CARTEL.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

This CAPTURE wasn't complete until the International Bankers were able to overthrow our Financial System and require all banks, loans, and corporate/legal entities to operate under the PRIVATE SCRIPT (Federal Reserve Notes) which solidified their control. No way to LAWFULLY PAY a debt, as the only constitutionally sound MONEY is gold/silver. We've been playing the perpetual game of kick-the-can down the river on our DEBT - creating a continuous revenue stream for the Bankers via interest payments.

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

The Federal Government became a mere administrator for the international banking cartel. It's time to #EndTheFed and set the People of America (and the World) free! https://t.co/gu9iyHquld

@RINOhunter1776 - Missouri RINO Watch

@threadreaderapp unroll por favor

trevor_hk
Posted - March 10, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Saved - March 10, 2025 at 7:42 PM

@trevor_hk - TREVOR

ALL THIS INFO IS COMING OUT AND ALL OF YOU STILL WANNA PAY TAXES! YOUR THE FUCKIN PROBLEM! https://t.co/NLMBN0hD5I

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US Treasury Department has been flagged for potential waste and abuse of taxpayer funds, with about 23% of entitlements, roughly $50 billion annually, going to recipients without known Social Security numbers or IDs. This equates to about a billion dollars a week in potential fraud. Adding to the concern, the Treasury Department hasn't been keeping itemized records of their payouts, making it impossible to track where the money is actually going. Fortunately, an agreement has been made where the Treasury Department will start itemizing all payments, detailing where the money is going and to whom. It's unbelievable that the Treasury hasn't had to provide accountability for where taxpayer money is being spent, especially when individual taxpayers are held to a much higher standard.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So more coming out from Doge. Apparently, this time it's the US Treasury Department who has more waste and abuse of taxpayer funds than so far anything else that they've looked at. 23%. And it appears that there are people receiving entitlements to the tune of 50,000,000,000 with a b dollars a year that have no known Social Security number or ID on file. 50,000,000,000. That's a billion dollars a week in fraud and abuse. But not only is a billion dollars a week going to unknown sources with no social security numbers and no valid ID. In addition to that, apparently, the treasury department doesn't keep itemized records of their payouts. So there's no way to follow-up and check as to where the money is going. So as of right now, the treasury department and Elon Musk Doge has agreed that going forward, the treasury department will now itemize all of the payments that they make, like where the money is going, to what entities, to whom. It is shocking to me, and it should be shocking to every taxpayer that our own treasury department has no accountability and keeps no formal records of where they're paying and what they're paying. We could not get away with that at home with our own budgets. And could you imagine if the IRS came into our houses and said, well, I I wanna see itemized list of all these things that you pay and we didn't have it, they would say, well, we're just gonna assume that you did x y z, and we're just gonna slap what we think you owe. But there's no accountability on their end. This is absolute insanity.
IngrahamAngle
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 10:24 AM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 11:54 PM

@IngrahamAngle - Laura Ingraham

DOGE TAKES ON THE IRS @SamCorcos, a key @DOGE hire at Treasury, reveals the IRS is 30 years behind and $15B over budget. “You cancel a $50M contract—and no one even knows why it existed.” Due to huge response, we’re posting the entire segment. Watch it all. https://t.co/CKhyBzKQcH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sam Korkos, a special advisor within the US Treasury, and Treasury Secretary Scott Vessant, discuss modernizing the IRS. Korkos is reviewing the IRS's modernization program, which is 30 years behind schedule and $15 billion over budget. The goal is to update the IRS's legacy infrastructure, which still uses old mainframes. Korkos says the IRS has talented software developers, but they haven't been empowered to make decisions. Vessant says entrenched interests and consultants have constricted themselves around the IRS, costing taxpayers unbelievable amounts of money. Korkos notes the IRS processes the same amount of data as a mid-sized bank, but with far more IT staff and a much larger budget, 80% of which goes to contractors and licenses. Vessant says his priorities for the IRS are collections, privacy, and customer service, none of which are being well served. Korkos has stopped work and cut about $1.5 billion from the modernization budget. He says the career staff has been cooperative. Vessant wants the American people to understand what is being done to make government work better, cheaper, faster, and with more privacy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doge was in the building. We started we took down our pride flags. We took down I took out any books I felt would be incriminating. No one was talking. We heard they started taking transcripts automatically of all of our Google Meets. We they unplugged the news in the little kitchen galleys. It didn't feel good. Speaker 1: Alright. Well, you've heard the sob stories, and they are quite entertaining at times. But the media, they continue to spread this story that Doge is some dark mysterious organization, you know, embedding itself in departments like some jackbooted thugs, just intimidating staff, threatening those who don't comply. Okay. We're asking, what is the truth? Well, tonight, we sit down exclusively with one of the men responsible for turning Elon Musk's Doge plans into reality. Joining me now is Sam Korkos, who's a special adviser within the US treasury department. He's also CEO and cofounder of Levels, which is a really cool health and wellness software company. Also joining me, he's getting second billing tonight, treasury secretary Scott Vessant. We'll get back to you, mister secretary, in a moment. But, Sam, let's start with you. Like, no one knows much about all of you guys who are working together, and I know you you you work at treasury now. Tell us what brought you here into Washington and what your top priority is. Speaker 2: Yeah. I've been brought in to look at the IRS's modernization program in particular as well as the operations and maintenance budget. I, I really care a lot about this country, and this is a huge program that's currently thirty years behind schedule, and it's already $15,000,000,000 over budget. Speaker 1: Wait. Wait. Wait a second. Wait a second. Explain to our viewers what the program is in layman's terms. Speaker 2: Yeah. So the goal is to take the IRS has some pretty legacy infrastructure. It's actually very similar to what banks have been using. It's old mainframes running COBOL and assembly. And the challenge has been how do we migrate that to a modern system. Virtually every bank has already done this, but we're still using a lot of those same systems. And typically, industry, this takes a few years, maybe a few hundred million dollars, and we're we're now thirty five years into this program. We've actually been if you ask them now, it's five years away, and it's been five years away since 1990. Supposed to be delivered in 1996, and it's still five years away. Speaker 1: In your area of expertise that informs your ability to do this review is what? Speaker 2: I'm a software developer by background, and I'm a CEO of a software technology company. Speaker 1: So when you came into department, the first thing you do is just get into the guts of the system and see how it operates? Speaker 2: Yeah. Really talk to the software developers. Talk to the people on the ground and what they're seeing. I think one encouraging thing is we actually have quite a lot of software talent on the ground, the people writing code. We actually have quite a lot of good people. It is almost always the case when I ask them what the correct answer is, how do we solve these problems? They're almost always right, which is good. They just haven't been in a position to be empowered to make those decisions. So I'm actually pretty optimistic that we can solve this. Speaker 1: Secretary Besson, why has this taken so long? I mean, Sam seems, you know, obviously very, very successful, extremely intelligent. But I assume we have other Sams in The United States. We could have had a Sam fifteen years ago come in and fix this. What is going on? Speaker 3: Well, Laura, you've you've been in DC a long time. I've been here eight weeks, but one of the things one of the biggest surprises for me is just seeing how these entrenched interest they just keep constricting themselves around the power, around the money, around the systems, and nobody cares. I mean, the you know, I I said to Sam today, I said, the the IRS system was the supposed to be delivered in 1996. And he said, no. But it was started in 1990. So that's how far behind they are, and nobody cares. And the the other thing we're seeing too is, as Sam said, some of the employees, many of the employees are fantastic. It's this consultant group who has just they're like a bow constrictor. They're like a python. They've got themselves Speaker 1: No pun intended. Speaker 3: Yeah. Python language. Speaker 1: All your coders have it. Speaker 3: It was intended. So Yeah. Okay. Smarty pants. Thanks. But they've constricted themselves around our government, and, you know, the the the costs are unbelievable that are being passed on to the American taxpayer. Speaker 1: Okay. So, Sam, again, you come in from this this tech company. You've been in directing engineering teams. You've been doing your own coding and software engineering for so many years. But you come in here, and you see this is one of the most important departments in in the world, not just in our government, in the world. And you see how this has been organized and and run for so many years, what as a as a human being, forget as a what is your reaction to that? Speaker 2: It's a Speaker 1: Were you stunned as I am just hearing about this? Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's hard to really grasp the scale of this because we process at the IRS about the same amount of data as a mid sized bank. And a typical mid sized bank will have somewhere between one and two hundred people in IT, and they'll have an operations and maintenance budget in, like, the $20,000,000 a year range. We have 8,000 people in IT, and our operations and maintenance budget is 3 and a half billion dollars a year. I don't really know why yet, but I will tell you that 80% of that budget goes to contractors and licenses. Speaker 1: So the contractors and putting them out putting these projects out to bid, mister secretary, how big a problem has that been? Speaker 3: Well, clearly, it's a problem, and that's why when you you and I were talking the other night, that's why I wanted to bring Sam in because I just gotten a briefing from him, and my jaw hit the ground when he was talking about the cost, the the timeline. As you know, we've talked about it before. I have three priorities with the IRS, collections, privacy, priorities with the IRS, collections, privacy, customer service, and none of those are being well served. Look look at the scale of this. Speaker 1: And, Sam, for Americans watching this tonight who've heard all these stories about the people brought in to dismantle the government and rip it apart and destroy people's lives, you didn't have to do this. You have a lot priorities in the business world. But, again, like Musk and like people even younger than you who came in, they got the world on a string. So what do you say to those people who are hearing all these frightening stories about what you and the Doge Bros, as they're called, are doing? Speaker 2: Yeah. This is definitely not on my bingo card for this year. I was very much planning to continue to focus on my company. We have 15 old boy. It's been really fun, but we're I I got a lot of friends of mine in administration telling me how serious the situation is, and so I'm taking some time to really focus on this. I think it is it is a huge part of our government is collecting taxes. We we cannot perform the basic functions of tax collection without paying a toll to all these contractors. We really have to figure out how to get out of this hole. We're in a really deep hole right now. Speaker 1: IRS employees according to CNN claim that you you were basically ignorant about how the agency works. Like I said, you were supposed to know everything before you got there, but that's what they're saying. Your response to that. Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, there's a lot of stuff that I don't know that I'm learning now. I think I know a lot about software systems. That's why I was brought in. So that's the main focus is how do we how do we turn this around? We have we have a 3 and a half billion dollar operations and maintenance budget. We have a $3,700,000,000 modernization effort within IT. That's a lot of budget, and we are way beyond any reasonable cost for what you would expect at a private company for this. Speaker 1: What has been the biggest surprise? You, again, secretary Bessence, you know, been in the business world as well, but he heard it from me. But when you first saw this, what was the biggest surprise that you found at that Department of Treasury? Speaker 2: I would say it's the disconnect between leadership and the people actually doing the work is a big one. I would say that there are it doesn't take a lot, just somebody who cares to solve these problems. You find contracts that are $10.20, $3,050,000,000 dollars, and you just ask, like, why are we doing this? And everyone was just like, I don't know. And then you cancel it, and then nothing happens. It's just inertia has just taken over. Speaker 1: What? What? I mean Okay. Okay. I'm so frustrated to hearing this, but I'm so glad you're getting your hands dirty by getting it getting in there. Mister secretary, Sam comes from the outside world. He he's very keen. I'm reading his bio and what he's done on time management. That's how he's been so successful, managing fifteen minute increments of his time, analyzing it. So he's data driven. This should be a data driven agency. You're a money guy. You've made billions of dollars in the business world because you're data driven. So why is this controversial to make the IRS data driven? Speaker 3: Well, because it's like I I called Elon. I said, Elon, you're you're under fire because you've moved people's cheese. And he said, well, it's the American people's cheese, and Yeah. The it doesn't belong to these people. And, again, that's why I wanted the American people to meet Sam. We're gonna bring some more Doge people forward to actually hear their stories, see what's being done because the consult the the entrenched interests, the consultants, the Democrats, mainstream media, they just wanna blow this project out of the water. And it's important because I keep saying this is the office of government efficiency, not elimination, not extinction. Sam and his crew are making it more efficient to work for the American people. So what's wrong with it working better, cheaper, faster, and with more privacy? Speaker 1: The president essentially said he wants efficiency across the federal government. He brought in Elon to do that. You're a big part of this. Is it possible, given what you've seen, as far as the resistance both in the courts and in, in among mostly Democrats? Speaker 2: I honestly, I haven't really had much of an issue. The career staff has been super cooperative. I think we've so far stopped work and cut about 1 and a half billion from the modernization budget, mostly projects that were going to continue to put us down this death spiral of complexity in our code base. I think most people that I've interacted with are really excited that somebody actually cares now. They've been in a situation where their hands are tied and they can't solve the things that they know need to be solved. My experience has honestly been very positive working with them. Speaker 1: I mean, this is back to the messaging point. And and again, going back to his his history in business, communication is key from staff to to leadership, leadership to staff. And also here, the consumers, the American people, the taxpayer, those are the ultimate consumers here. It's very important that you had this idea to bring Sam in, but people need to understand what this is. Speaker 3: Yeah. But look, it it it's that it's all hands on deck because we got this massive, the government debt. We're gonna pay that down, but we're also gonna make government work better. You know, again, if you were to ask Sam about the customer support, it's unbelievable. The the system, the customer support, they have exact the same number of people working on Christmas Eve as they do on April 14 at the IRS. Why? Speaker 1: So efficiency across the board must be implemented. It's unfair to the taxpayer who foots the bill for all of us. Unfair. Well, I I don't A rip off. Speaker 3: Yeah. And look. I we want people to like the government. We want the government Speaker 1: to gonna like the IRS. Sorry. Well, Speaker 3: we we want people to feel satisfied Yeah. That they are getting the service they deserve, that they're paying their fair share and not more, not less, and that it's done quickly, smartly, and privately. Speaker 1: Sam, how long are you Speaker 2: gonna stay in Washington? Committed to six months. Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. Sam and mister secretary, thank you both for joining us. Really appreciate it. Speaker 3: Good to see you. Speaker 1: Sam, keep working.
GoyWonderTM
Posted - April 7, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Saved - April 7, 2025 at 7:49 PM

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

That wouldn’t work for DOGE, because the companies and PE firms it’s working to cover for are extremely Jewish and equally dependent on perpetual, state-subsidized funding.

@KristinNap95 - Kristin Napolillo

@GoyWonderTM I wish there was more talk about flat tax or no tax instead of thinking about ways to streamline the IRS.

drawandstrike
Posted - April 9, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 2:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses concerns about the IRS potentially revealing the benefits received by undocumented immigrants and the implications for taxpayers. One participant suggests that intelligence agencies have been funding criminal gangs using taxpayer money, rather than their own. They express alarm over the Trump administration's efforts to dismantle these networks, which they believe threatens the interests of these agencies. Another participant counters that the agencies are not averse to spending their own money but are more concerned about avoiding a direct connection to the funding.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

You know what's about to happen, right? Right? They're not only going to FIND these illegals via the IRS...and deport them. Oh no, that's only PART OF THE FUN that's coming. They're ALSO going to SHOW you how much of your TAX DOLLARS these people were getting in benefits. Millions of them were getting SUBSTANTIAL payments every month. THIS is why the acting IRS head resigned. She's getting clear of the coming fallout.

@drawandstrike - Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit

BTW, how do you think the CIA/MIC/ICS has been paying these Operation Gladio terrorist criminal gangs they imported to be their muscle here domestically? You think the [C]entral [I]ntelligence [A]gency, the [M]ilitary [I]ntelligence [C]onglomerate, or the [I]nternational [C]rime [S]yndicate has been paying these gangs to run their human/sex/child/drug trafficking networks here inside the United States using THEIR OWN MONEY? Well...PREPARE YOURSELF FOR A SHOCK. They haven't been using their OWN money to pay these gangs...they've been using YOUR money. Starting to see why the CIA/MIC/ICS is currently siccing all their rent-a-mobs on Elon/DOGE/Tesla? THEY NEED THE MONEY SPIGOT TURNED BACK ON. They don't wanna have to start spending their OWN MONEY for their war crime operations against the United States. They HATE the idea of having to suddenly reach into their OWN wallets and pay the criminal gang networks they've used to infiltrate the US with their own cash. They would MUCH rather try some desperate scheme where they force Trump/Musk/DOGE into BACKING OFF and turning the USAID $ and the SSA $ back on that their hired muscle has been getting. Not only is the money to these MS-13/TdA gangs currently being cut off, the Trump administration is currently TRACKING THE GANG NETWORKS DOWN and quickly SENDING THEM TO A MAX SECURITY PRISON in El Salvador. Much to the CIA/MIC/ICS's absolute horror. DECADES of careful planning and strategizing that they invest BILLIONS [of mostly OUR MONEY] into is being flushed right down the toilet every day that Elon/Pam/Tulsi/Kristi/Kash/Pete are allowed to dismantle these carefully constructed national networks. This is an EXISTENTIAL FIGHT for these people. They know **exactly** where Trump and his team are going to head next once the MASSIVE NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT of these muscle gangs have been dealt with and fully neutralized. Once you are done with the 'capos', you go after the Dons. This is how you roll up a massive RICO network. And that's exactly what this is.

@henehan - Pete

@drawandstrike I don’t think they hate spending their own money. They don’t want the money trail to lead back to them personally! They are not stupid. They are not deranged. They are shrewd, cunning, laser focused and VERY dangerous.

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 10:50 PM
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 1:48 AM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Tax Day is the perfect day to remind everyone that El Salvador President Nayib Bukele EXPOSED The IRS and Income Tax System Are 100% UNNECESSARY “You pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not” Abolish The IRS https://t.co/2W53JMs5Tt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that high taxes are not the core financial problem in the United States. They argue that taxes don't truly fund the government, which is instead financed by treasury bonds purchased by the Federal Reserve. The Fed buys these bonds by printing money, which is backed by the bonds themselves. Taxes exist, according to the speaker, to maintain the illusion of government funding. The speaker contends that the government is funded by printing money backed by paper, creating a bubble. If the public were to realize this, confidence in the dollar would collapse, potentially leading to the fall of Western civilization. The speaker urges the next president to implement necessary policy and structural changes to avoid this outcome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For instance, the financial situation of The United States. When I talk to my conservative friends right here, they always tell me that the problem is high taxes, but they're wrong. Of course, high taxes are extremely high here in The United States. I I give you that. You're right in that. But that's not the real problem. The real problem is not the high taxes themselves, but the fact that they are not even really funding the government. But even those high taxes, higher than a lot of places in the world, not even those taxes are really funding the government. So who's financing the government? Government is financed by treasury bonds, paper. And who buys the treasury bonds? Mostly the Fed. And how does the Fed buy them? By printing money. But what backing does the Fed have for that money being printed? The treasury bonds themselves. So, basically, you finance the government by printing money out of thin air. Someone could ask someone could ask, well, so if the government can print the limited amounts of money out of thin air, why did they collect taxes? I mean, a theory would make sense. Right? If they can print unlimited amounts of money, why would they need taxes for? The answer is simple, but it's very shocking. The real problem is that you pay high taxes only to uphold the illusion that you are funding the government, which you are not. It's shocking, but it's true. The government is funded by money printing, paper backed with paper, a bubble that will inevitably burst. The situation is even worse than it seems because if most Americans and the rest of the world were to become aware of these bars, confidence in your currency would be lost. The dollar will fall and the Western civilization with it. If the next president of The United States doesn't make the necessary policies and the structural changes, sooner or later, that bubble will burst. There's still time. You don't have to make the same mistakes we did in the sixties and the seventies. You can still jump before the water boils.
mistergusano
Posted - April 19, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Saved - April 19, 2025 at 6:36 PM

@mistergusano - Gusano

The most Technocratic and jewish administration ever! DOGE partnership with Palantir to build a “mega API” for the IRS. This is another step towards centralization, UBI, and CBDC, which comes in perfect timing with the Real ID issue. https://t.co/hEmUmQFp75

Red_Pill_US
Posted - May 16, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Saved - May 16, 2025 at 12:43 PM

@Red_Pill_US - Red Pill USA

@ThrillaRilla369 🔥The concept of paying taxes is rooted in Marxism says "RichDadPoorDad" author Robert Kiyosaki. "The facts are America was founded as a tax free nation. It was called the Boston Tea Party, and we were tax free for all of these years until 1913." https://t.co/atJfaJAXPt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker owns 12,000 rental units acquired through debt, stating that more debt leads to more property and less tax. They believe paying taxes is a Marxist idea and against American principles. According to the speaker, Marx considered a progressive income tax essential for spreading communism. They claim America was founded as a tax-free nation until the creation of the Federal Reserve and the IRS in 1913. They assert that they legally pay no taxes, while those who work harder pay higher taxes, which they equate to communism. The speaker concludes it's an American duty not to pay taxes, citing the Communist Manifesto.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I own about 12,000 rental units. How did I acquire those property? I used debt. You see, the more debt I use, the more property I own, the less tax I pay. And if you think paying taxes is illegal, tax is a Marxist idea. I hate this. When people say, well, you should pay taxes. No. We shouldn't. What Marx says is that a progressive and oppressive income tax is essential for the spread of communism. That was in 1848. The facts are America was founded as a tax free nation. It was called the Boston Tea Party, and we were tax free for all of these years until 1913 when the Fed was created, the same year, guess what else was created, the IRS. And ever since then, we're paying taxes. So guys like me pay no taxes legally, but the more harder you work, the more money you make, the higher taxes you pay. If that's not communism, what is? And I think it's an American duty not to pay our taxes because if you read the communist manifesto, you'd understand why.
AlwaysKnocking
Posted - July 4, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Saved - July 6, 2025 at 3:28 AM

@AlwaysKnocking - AlwaysKnocking

@PaleBlue1983 @BlueFinn42 @LibertyLockPod you mean like the 80,000 IRS agents that were there to "Go after the rich"

annvandersteel
Posted - August 22, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Saved - August 23, 2025 at 3:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered shocking news about the IRS. They’ve been involved in a RICO fraud against the American people, fabricating tax returns and using fake records in court. This goes beyond taxes; it’s a criminal cartel within our government that includes the DOJ and Judiciary. It's time to abolish the IRS.

@annvandersteel - Ann Vandersteel™️

BREAKING NEWS! 🚨 We CAUGHT the IRS 🚨 They’ve been running a RICO fraud against the American people — fabricating tax returns, covering it up, and using fake records in court. This isn’t a tax issue. It’s a multi-layered criminal cartel in our government that includes: I.R.S. D.O.J. Judiciary 👉 Watch & see why it’s time to ABOLISH the IRS. #IRS #RICO #ShutItDown

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We got them. We finally got them. We caught the IRS red handed." "They're frauds, fabricated, phantom tax returns the IRS claims that you filed but can't produce because they never existed." "Here's the crime. An IRS agent falsified the records." "A supervisor covered it up." "The DOJ marched into court and used those fake records against Americans and then admitted under oath they have no signed returns to back it up." "That's not sloppy paperwork. That's a RICO fraud, a criminal enterprise operating under color of law." "And it doesn't stop there. Judges look the other way." "Multilayered fraud, IRS, DOJ, and the judicial system." "It's time to shut down this rogue agency once and for all." "Chew on this, America."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We got them. We finally got them. We caught the IRS red handed. For years, they've been telling you, the American people, to pay up or else waving around those so called official transcripts and certificates as if they were gospel. Well, guess what? They're frauds, fabricated, phantom tax returns the IRS claims that you filed but can't produce because they never existed. Here's the crime. An IRS agent falsified the records. A supervisor covered it up. The DOJ marched into court and used those fake records against Americans and then admitted under oath they have no signed returns to back it up. That's not sloppy paperwork. That's a RICO fraud, a criminal enterprise operating under color of law. And it doesn't stop there. Judges look the other way. Clerks issued phantom orders, and the whole rotten system circled the wagons to protect itself. Multilayered fraud, IRS, DOJ, and the judicial system. This is enough. Enough to prove the IRS is not a tax collector. It's a criminal cartel preying on its own people. And when an agency survives only by fabricated evidence, it's not just corrupt. It's illegitimate. It's time to shut down this rogue agency once and for all. We're not gonna reform it. We're not gonna slap it on the wrist. We're gonna abolish it. We've got the evidence. We've got the admissions. And now the American people have the truth. The IRS has been running a RICO fraud, and the whole house of cards is coming down. Chew on this, America.
Prolotario1
Posted - November 3, 2023 at 2:16 PM
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 2:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The IRS is facing a $14 billion budget shortfall, which will have significant consequences. Without funding, they won't be able to pay employees or provide essential services. User fees and revolving funds won't be enough to cover the costs. Various offices within the IRS, including the Commissioner's office, Chief Counsel office, and Operations Support, will be impacted. Taxpayer services will suffer, and the IRS will struggle to function. This situation can be attributed to decisions made by Mike Johnson. Additionally, a recent Supreme Court ruling questions the power of unelected agencies like the IRS. This ruling could lead to the demise of various government agencies and a reduction in government power. The power is being returned to the people, and unconstitutional agencies can be removed. The FBI's recent actions against Democrats may be connected to these changes.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

The IRS Problem: The 14 Billion Dollar Tab Are you under the new monetary system now? No. Did Iraq reinstate their currency on the Forex Market? No. Did speaker Mike Johnson send your tax money to Israel? No. Why are these questions important? Because the American 1st policies are on the other side of the new financial system that will be funded by "Real Money". Why in the world are some people upset that fiat debt that was stolen from you in the form of taxes is being used to defund the IRS? Their entire budget is depleted. Do you know what this will lead to? Congressional Appropriations: The IRS receives the majority of its funding from Congress. This funding is used to cover the costs of operations, including salaries, benefits, and technology. How in the world will they be able to collect taxes when they will not have any money to pay the employees hired to do it? You think people want to work for free? You can thank Mike Johnson for that. User fees: The IRS also collects user fees for certain services, such as tax preparation assistance and e-filing. These fees help to offset the cost of providing these services. Guess what? How is this service going to function when they will have to rely on tax revenue they will not be able to afford to finance if the fees itself are continent upon services they can't afford dye to budget cuts? You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Revolving Funds: The IRS also has a number of revolving funds, which are used to finance certain activities, such as tax enforcement and taxpayer services. These funds are replenished with revenue from the activities they support. How are they going to be able to use these funds for daily operational cost when you do not even file until April next year? Remember the IRS is a Democrat agency. Guess who runs the House & Senate? Republicans. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of The Commissioner: This office oversees the IRS and is responsible for developing and implementing tax policy. The budget for the OTC includes funding for salaries, benefits, and travel. Sections where the budget goes for the building that will be impacted includes what? The Commissioner's office. The IRS Executive Committee Suite. The IRS Briefing Room. Remember, they have no budget for this year or next. Their entire 14 billion is being used for foreign aid. This agency has been used to bully you into submission. Property seizure and jail time if you do not pay. And they are facing bankruptcy now? You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of Chief Counsel: The office provides legal advice to the IRS and represents the IRS in Maritime court. The budget for this office also includes funding for salaries, benefits, and travel. The lack of budget will impact what areas? The Chief Counsel office. The IRS Legal Library. The IRS Hearing Room. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of Operations Support: This area provides support services to the IRS, such as human resources, information technology, and security. The budget for this includes funding for salaries, benefits, and technology. What will be impacted when there is no money in the budget? The IRS Data Center. The IRS Security Command Center. The IRS Employee Training Center. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Office of Taxpayer Services: This area provides assistance to taxpayers with tax preparation and filing. The budget for this also includes again funding for salaries, benefits, and tech. What areas will be impacted for the lack of budget to function? The IRS Taxpayer Assistance Center. The IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) Site. The IRS Taxpayer Education Center. You can thank Mike Johnson for that. Are you getting the impression that I am rubbing this in your face? If so you are correct. Can I whisper something in your ear? Pssst.... come here. The IRS is already shutdown. How? Watch Nancy Drew on Telegram dated 1/16/22 she gives daily updates on how this building has been closed for years. But no need to to search I will post it here. (https://t.me/KBlive/6257) Do you want to know one reason how this physical shutdown happened? The West Virginia vs EPA Supreme Court Ruling. You haven't heard of this in your mainstream news. Want to know why? Because it's owned by the same people that owns the IRS. The Rothschilds/Khazarians. West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a U.S. Supreme Court case. It asks whether important policies that impact the lives of all Americans, should be made by unelected D.C. bureaucrats or by congress. This SCOTUS decision that ruling by executive agency is no longer acceptable. So any laws that are on the books that haven't been passed through congress are void. This includes EOs and government agencies “rules”. [June 30, 2022] JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE ALITO joined, con- curring. To resolve today’s case the Court invokes the major ques- tions doctrine. Under that doctrine’s terms, administrative agencies must be able to point to “‘clear congressional au- thorization’ when they claim the power to make decisions of vast "economic and political significance". Ante, at 17, 19. Like many parallel clear-statement rules in our law, this one operates to protect foundational constitutional guarantees. I join the Court’s opinion and write to offer some additional observations about the doctrine on which it rests. Since 1970, the major questions doctrine soon took on spe- cial importance.2 In 1980, this Court held it “unreasonable to assume” that Congress gave an agency “unprecedented power[s]” in the “absence of a clear [legislative] mandate.” Industrial Union Dept., AFL–CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, 448 U. S. 607, 645 (plurality opinion). In the years that followed, the Court routinely enforced “the non- delegation doctrine” through “the interpretation of status. What does this ruling ultimately mean for 3 letter agencies? A. This latest Supreme Court ruling will allow the demise of the power the EPA. In a landmark case, West Virginia vs. EPA, it was decided that these congress created agencies are not part of the Republic. This ends the following agencies. FBI CIA ATF DEA IRS NIH CDC FDA School Boards and more! This cornerstone case was set up to take the whole corrupt government. The power is being returned back to the people and government will be curtailed to 10%. That means, all Executive Order DS-(Deep Space) POTUS created agencies that were unconstitutional can now be removed. All 3 letter agencies. The States that don’t follow this? Will be sent to GITMO. Guess what? Mike Johnson was sworn in under the Republic. Why do you think D. Trump is so bold in saying we can take the country back in less than 5 months? You do not find it funny that the FBI is now going after Democrats? Stop the Fucking crying & whining.

Nancy Drew Fb live ❤️ 1/16/22 12:45 am IRS Building update t.me
View Full Interactive Feed