TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - May 9, 2023 at 7:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The real pandemic is not COVID-19, but rather a multitude of societal issues. Left-leaning educational institutions indoctrinate young people, while biased mainstream media perpetuates misinformation and division. Political correctness and cancel culture stifle open discourse, and open borders undermine national sovereignty. The relentless expansion of government power encroaches on individual liberties, and victimhood mentality spreads throughout society. End-of-pipe solutions are favored over addressing root causes, and identity politics divides society. The blind trust in figures like Bill Gates replaces expert opinion with celebrity influence. Personal liberties are lost in the name of safety and security, setting dangerous precedents for future crises. Fear is manipulated to create a culture of compliance, and processed food is normalized over a healthy diet. Obesity is promoted as normal, and gender reassignment is casually accepted. Women seek validation through social media, and experimental gene therapies pose potential risks. Reading and attention spans decline due to social media, resulting in a less informed and easily manipulated public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵THREAD: What if I told you the real pandemic isn't Covid?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2 The real pandemic is the indoctrination of young people through left-leaning educational institutions. FACT: All of the top 25 universities in the country were mandating that their students be vaccinated (https://bit.ly/3Mc1RQC).

In A Divided America, Every One Of Nation’s Top 25 Universities Now Requiring Students To Be Vaccinated With the new academic year beginning soon, all of the institutions ranked among the top 25 in the nation by U.S. News & World Report are requiring their students to be vaccinated. But many public universities remain reluctant to go that route. forbes.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3 The real pandemic is the mainstream media's biased reporting, which perpetuates misinformation and division. FACT: Mainstream media was actively discriminating against the unvaccinated and pushing the narrative. Critical journalists got dismissed.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#4 The real pandemic is the assault on free speech, as political correctness and cancel culture stifle open discourse. FACT: Those who do not comply with political correctness are canceled and socially excluded. (https://bit.ly/3NTyJPe)

Misgendering Is a Human Rights Violation, Canadian Court Rules A human rights tribunal ruled that pronouns are “a fundamental part of a person’s identity.” them.us

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#5 The real pandemic is the push for open borders and mass immigration, which undermines national sovereignty and identity. FACT: About 2.7 million people illegally crossed the Southern border in 2022 (https://nbcnews.to/3nT57XE).

Migrant border crossings in fiscal year 2022 topped 2.76 million, breaking previous record The number of undocumented immigrant crossings at the southern border in fiscal 2022 topped 2.76 million, breaking the previous annual record by 1 million. nbcnews.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#6 The real pandemic is the relentless expansion of government power, which encroaches on individual liberties. FACT: The plandemic was used as a catalyst for mass surveillance laws (https://bit.ly/3HV4vaK).

The COVID-19 pandemic: Yet another catalyst for governmental mass surveillance? This commentary addresses the use of surveillance technologies in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, using examples from the current geopolitical f… sciencedirect.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#7 The real pandemic is the devaluation of personal responsibility, as victimhood mentality spreads throughout society. FACT: The younger generation is being offended by literally everything, which includes that someone didn't ask for their pronouns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#8 The real pandemic is the use of end-of-pipe solutions instead of addressing the root cause of a problem. FACT: Early treatments would have saved millions of lives, but instead Ivermectin and Vitamin D are still demonized.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#9 The real pandemic is the promotion of identity politics, which divides society and undermines national unity. FACT: Spot the trans woman. If you claim you can, you are a transphobic bigot, because they blend in with society just like you and me.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#10 The real pandemic is the push for globalism, which threatens national sovereignty and dilutes unique cultural identities. FACT: The WEF boasts of controlling most politicians in Western countries. None of us has elected the WEF.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#11 The real pandemic is the blind trust in figures like Bill Gates, where expert opinion is replaced by celebrity influence. FACT: Bill Gates is anything but an expert in health matters, but has repeatedly been portrayed as one by the media.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#12 The real pandemic is the infringement on Second Amendment rights, leaving law-abiding citizens vulnerable. FACT: These well-known world leaders who took guns away from their citizens. It didn't end well.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#13 The real pandemic is the radical climate agenda, which hampers economic growth and job opportunities. FACT: The IPCC data is very questionable and has been 'adjusted' multiple times in the past (see: climategate). Additionally, the media reports very selectively.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#14 The real pandemic is the promotion of critical race theory, which perpetuates racial division and resentment. FACT: This is mainly fueled by the media, as shown by @KanekoaTheGreat in his thread.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#1 Look at the increase of news articles mentioning "white privilege," "systemic racism," "diversity and inclusion," and "unconscious bias." How does the media's focus on identity politics and critical race theory contribute to the division and polarization of society?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#15 The real pandemic is the suppression of critical voices on social media platforms, hindering free thought and debate. FACT: Thousands of us have been banned from social media for something that is now considered "mainstream". And it will happen again.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1/ During the last 3 years, @twitter has banned many scientists, doctors, journalists, and activists. This 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 tells the stories of many censorship victims. Please RT so @elonmusk gets aware of the sad fact that many of us are still banned and waiting to get reinstated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#16 The real pandemic is men watching porn and women taking birth control. FACT: The excessive consumption of porn has been shown to reduce sexual desire in both men and women (https://bit.ly/41l84hx). The resulting decline in population is a cause for concern. https://bit.ly/41l84hx).

Is Internet Pornography Causing Sexual Dysfunctions? A Review with Clinical Reports Traditional factors that once explained men’s sexual difficulties appear insufficient to account for the sharp rise in erectile dysfunction, delayed ejaculation, decreased sexual satisfaction, and diminished libido during partnered sex in men under 40. This review (1) considers data from multiple domains, e.g., clinical, biological (addiction/urology), psychological (sexual conditioning), sociological; and (2) presents a series of clinical reports, all with the aim of proposing a possible direction for future research of this phenomenon. Alterations to the brain's motivational system are explored as a possible etiology underlying pornography-related sexual dysfunctions. This review also considers evidence that Internet pornography’s unique properties (limitless novelty, potential for easy escalation to more extreme material, video format, etc.) may be potent enough to condition sexual arousal to aspects of Internet pornography use that do not readily transition to real-life partners, such that sex with desired partners may not register as meeting expectations and arousal declines. Clinical reports suggest that terminating Internet pornography use is sometimes sufficient to reverse negative effects, underscoring the need for extensive investigation using methodologies that have subjects remove the variable of Internet pornography use. In the interim, a simple diagnostic protocol for assessing patients with porn-induced sexual dysfunction is put forth. mdpi.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#17 The real pandemic is the marginalization of climate change skeptics, stifling balanced debate and comprehensive understanding of the issue. FACT: Climate models are considered 'scientific consensus'. Those who are questioning the narrative are labeled as 'climate deniers'.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two natural experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As an engineer educated in atmospheric gases and as a business manager, I was responsible for hundreds of people's lives based on my knowledge of atmospheric gases. I listen to scientists. I cross examine scientists and I debate the science. I have never found anyone Logical scientific points based on empirical scientific evidence that shows we have anything to worry about at all. And the basics of this, When you burn a hydrocarbon fuel, you burn molecules containing carbon and hydrogen with oxygen, they form C O 2 carbon dioxide and h two o water vapor. That's it. Carbon dioxide is essential for all life, but let's go beyond the science and have a look at natural experiment. We have had two Natural experiments, global experiments in the last 14 years. The first was in 2009 when the use of hydrocarbon fuels in the recession that followed the global financial crisis Reduced. There was less carbon dioxide produced from from human use of hydrocarbons. And what did that what happened to the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? It kept increasing. And what happened in 2020, when we had a major recession, almost a depression around the world as a result of COVID restrictions placed by governments. We saw the same reduction in hydrocarbon fuel used by humans, the same cutting carbon dioxide output from humans, and yet carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continued increasing. And those who understand the science understand that it is fundamental. Humans cannot and do not affect the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It's controlled by nature entirely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#18 The real pandemic is the loss of personal liberties in the name of safety & security, setting dangerous precedents for future crises. FACT: Vax certificates were only the beginning. Digital currencies and social & carbon credit systems will follow (https://on.wsj.com/3HX4dQR). https://on.wsj.com/3HX4dQR).

Central-Bank Digital Currencies Are Coming—Whether Countries Are Ready or Not The game-changing development could have a profound impact on the banking system. But few people still understand it. wsj.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#19 The real pandemic is the manipulation of fear, creating a culture of compliance and discouraging dissent and independent thought. FACT: Spreading fear & panic during the 'pandemic' was most likely the main driver for excess death. We've been warned (https://bit.ly/42jvJjO). https://bit.ly/42jvJjO).

Fear and panic can do more harm than the coronavirus, says PM Lee Hsien Loong He noted that Singapore is much better prepared to deal with the new coronavirus because of its experience tackling Sars 17 years ago. Read more at straitstimes.com. straitstimes.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#20 The real pandemic is the normalization of processed food, as a healthy and balanced diet is disregarded in favor of convenience and artificial flavors. FACT: Hardly anyone of gen Z knows how to cook nutritious and healthy food. Graph: % of consumed processed food.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#21 The real pandemic is the promotion of obesity as 'normal,' overshadowing the serious health risks associated with excessive weight and unhealthy lifestyle choices. FACT: Being obese is a choice and not healthy. Those who state this are usually being accused of 'fat-shaming'.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#22 The real pandemic is the casual acceptance of gender reassignment, undermining the biological realities and potential psychological implications of such profound changes. FACT: Women are women, men are men. Women can menstruate, men can't.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#23 The real pandemic is the growing trend of women seeking validation through likes on Instagram and OnlyFans, as self-worth becomes increasingly tied to online approval. FACT: There are beta-males paying for that.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#24 The real pandemic is the potential risks posed by experimental gene therapies, as the rush for solutions may overshadow comprehensive safety evaluations. FACT: We still do not know the long-term effects of these COVID vaccines. But the data does not look good.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#25 The real pandemic is the decline in reading and the shortened attention spans due to social media, resulting in a less informed and more easily manipulated public. FACT: More and more young people are no longer reading books. Instead, they are liking photos on Instagram.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#26 The real pandemic is the scarcity of authentic voices in a sea of online noise. Don't let this epidemic continue unchecked. Hit the follow button and join the resistance. 🔥

Saved - November 21, 2023 at 10:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Vaccine-Induced Long COVID: Examining the Evidence In a highly vaccinated population, 20% developed Long COVID, raising concerns about the role of vaccines. Claims suggesting that more vaccine doses offer protection against Long COVID are debunked. The data analysis reveals no significant difference in risk between the two-dose and >2 dose groups. Manipulative data separation and negative efficacy rates further question the vaccine's effectiveness. Additionally, a 2020 study highlights a significant increase in Long COVID cases post-vaccination. The evidence demands a closer examination of vaccine-induced Long COVID.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

BOOM 💥💥💥💥 How much more evidence do you need that #LongCovid is a vaccine induced condition? 20% of a population in which 94% were "vaccinated" developed "Long COVID" That's it. Game over.

@NarfGb - 🕯NarfGB

@Jikkyleaks @tatiann69922625 @DoorlessCarp @53v3n0fn1n3 @Maples46014332 @knigotnik @kacdnp91 @Fynnderella1 @TracyBethHoeg @AGHuff Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706v1.full.pdf "But we saved them from Long Covid."™

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

A follow-up to clarify some things because there are claims in the paper that more vaccine doses creates some protection against #LongCOVID. This is demonstrably false.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Dunning Kruger returns. This is the table that @LanderPeterjohn is attempting the "gotcha" on. But there are four reasons why it's obvious that there is no "benefit" from more vaccine doses: 1⃣ there was NO significant difference between the two dose group and the >2 dose group (140/703 vs 1989/10994, p=0.22) in risk. The claim that the 4+ group had a lower risk required artificially separating out this group in order to get a "significant result". That's called p-hacking. 2⃣the two-dose group was combined with the unvaccinated group. This is comical data manipulation for this claim 3⃣ in Table 3 of the paper there was no difference in health service utilisation between the 4+ dose and other groups, yet 93% of the sufferers of had received at least 3 doses of vaccine. The 3+ dose rate (16+) for WA as at 1/1/23 was 79.3%. This gives a negative efficacy of -247% for preventing "Long COVID". This is the only conclusion that can be reliably drawn from the data provided. https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.06.23293706v1

Long COVID in a highly vaccinated population infected during a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron wave – Australia, 2022 medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This thread has been hit by far-left trolls like this one so will probably be locked soon. I'd really love to know who pays for all these people. Anyway it's a good way of getting a block list.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

More on this thread as the pharma accounts try to cover up the findings...

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

.@_johnbye is struggling again to push a false narrative by only reading a conclusion that he doesn't understand instead of the data itself. That's why his posts can be easily dismissed and why he didn't post a link to the thread which contained the analysis

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

And just to drive home the very clear finding that the risk of Long COVID was massively increased after the vaccine roll out... Here is the main paper from 2020 showing that 90 day LC only occurred in 2.3% of patients pre-vax, not 20%

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

@Topaz20211 @SalvMattera 2.3%, which includes 1% or so background rate of those symptoms https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611399/

Attributes and predictors of long COVID Reports of long-lasting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms, the so-called ‘long COVID’, are rising but little is known about prevalence, risk factors or whether it is possible to predict a protracted course early in the disease. ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

This thread ended up a bit confusing so I have reposted it, hopefully more clearly. https://t.co/p3R9Hmf0Vf

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

UPDATED 🧀🧀... Because so many Pharma advocates are trying to wriggle out of this really obvious fail of the COVID vaccines in preventing #LongCOVID I'll put it in a graph format, with references in the tweets to follow. @stkirsch @_johnbye @Johnincarlisle https://t.co/0ECXbQ2v4T

Saved - November 21, 2023 at 9:05 PM

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

UPDATED 🧀🧀... Because so many Pharma advocates are trying to wriggle out of this really obvious fail of the COVID vaccines in preventing #LongCOVID I'll put it in a graph format, with references in the tweets to follow. @stkirsch @_johnbye @Johnincarlisle https://t.co/0ECXbQ2v4T

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

BOOM 💥💥💥💥 How much more evidence do you need that #LongCovid is a vaccine induced condition? 20% of a population in which 94% were "vaccinated" developed "Long COVID" That's it. Game over.

Saved - October 29, 2023 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent article suggests that Covid infections may have lasting effects on people's immunity, increasing the risk of long-term illnesses like diabetes, strokes, and heart disease. However, the article fails to address the potential damage caused by Covid injections or acknowledge that these medical issues could also be linked to the injections. This cover-up and gaslighting continue to ignore the elephant in the room. Watch the video for more information.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Covid May Have Permanently Damaged People's Immunity. That's the headline of a @1NewsNZ article today. The article reads: "Covid infections are putting people at higher risk of diabetes, strokes, heart disease and other long-term illnesses." Predictably, the article says absolutely nothing about the damage the #Covid injections are causing to the immune system, or the fact that the medical issues being attributed to #Covid are also being caused by the injections. So the cover-up is happening, the elephant in the room continues to be ignored, and the gaslighting just gets more wicked and more brazen 😠 Make sure you watch this video right to the end, and please retweet it. @GaryPayinda @DrAnnaNZ @winstonpeters @nzlabour @NZNationalParty @RCR_NZ @drcole12 @nzdsos @ClareCraigPath @HatchardMedia @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra @HopeRising1 @voices_nz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine's impact on the immune system. They believe that the vaccine may lead to chronic diseases and permanently alter the immune system. They mention a drop in killer T cells and an increase in herpes family viruses, shingles, and human papillomavirus. They also note an increase in molluscum contagiosum and endometrial cancers. The vaccine is said to weaken the immune system and redirect cellular activity. The speakers reference data showing a doubling of diseases in categories such as acute kidney and liver injury, myo and pericarditis, and thrombosis. They argue that these illnesses are not solely due to COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What you're seeing or what is your biggest concern with this vaccine right now if you were to pick 1? Speaker 1: [Dr. That it's going to lead to severe chronic disease of the immune suppressed type, obviously in a set percentage of the cancers, but I'm highly concerned that we are greatly altering detrimentally permanently the immune system of individuals that keep getting these shots. To give a chronic lipid nanoparticle and a chronic spike making factory in your body, in your cells, and we know that spike is toxic, we are messing up permanently the immune systems of people and who knows what disease they're going to die from them from that secondarily. Post vaccine, what we're seeing is a drop in your killer T cells, your CD8 cells. And what does CD8 cells do? They keep All other viruses in check. What am I seeing in the laboratory? I'm seeing an uptick of herpes family viruses. I'm seeing, herpes. I'm seeing shingles. I'm seeing mono. I'm seeing a huge uptick in human papillomavirus, in the cervical biopsies and the cervical pap smears in women. Speaker 2: So we have record all cause deaths. We have record hospitalizations and a lot of studies now are connecting vaccination To a reduction in our, the functioning of our immune system. Speaker 1: In addition to that, there's a little infectious, you know, bump the get called molluscum contagiosum. What do you need to keep that in check? You need CD8 killer T cells. I am seeing a 20 times increase in individuals over the age of 50 of this Little bump and rash. You know, that's innocuous, but what it tells me is the immune status of these individuals who have gotten the shot. We're literally weakening the immune system of these individuals. Now most concerning of all is there's a pattern of these Types of immune cells in the body that keep cancer in check. Well, since January 1, in the laboratory, I have seen a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis. I'm seeing invasive melanomas in younger patients. Normally, we catch those early and they're thin melanomas. I'm seeing thick melanomas skyrocketing in the last month or 2. I'm already seeing the early signals. And we are modifying the immune system to a weakened state. Great study out of Germany that looked at these profiles on young individuals after the Pfizer. Speaker 2: And you have to realize that the vaccine actually is designed to alter our immune function. It's designed to redirect cellular activity to undertake new novel tasks. And the tasks it has to do is It reproduces the spike protein, which is toxic. The hospitals are overwhelmed Doctor. And the, a freedom of information request has just revealed that in 2021 as the vaccine was rolled out, before we had COVID, we had a vaccine was rolled out before we had COVID. We had a doubling of disease in several key categories, so acute kidney injury, Acute liver injury, myo and pericarditis, thrombosis, so 12 actual categories. You know, year by year it's getting worse as people have more, apparently as people are having more vaccinations. But, you know, the what's thrown back in your face From, in official sources is, well, well we don't think it's the vaccine, it's COVID. But the key point that comes out of the Wellington data Is this because they have data broken down by age and, year. And look at 2021. In 2021, up to September, up to the end of September, we had very little COVID, almost none, yet we had vaccination. And you find the same massive increases in categories of illness occurring in 2020, in that Period in 2021. So that's when it all began. And it, it cannot be argued, as Michael Baker has persistently argue that it's all due to COVID and long COVID because we didn't have COVID and long COVID then. Doctor. So that's when this tsunami of illness in these different categories like, heart attacks and so on thrombotic, events and, started up. And that's irrefutable.
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 9:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation discusses the alleged injuries caused by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines among healthcare workers. It claims that 10% of them are injured, 7% severely, and 2% are unable to work. The conversation also suggests that governments are buying their silence with millions of dollars for "Long COVID" support. The discussion mentions the allocation of funds by the UK, US, and Australia for research and recognition of "Long COVID" as an occupational disease. It speculates that governments may attempt to silence vaccine-injured healthcare workers to promote future mRNA vaccines.

@MakisMD - William Makis MD

NEW ARTICLE: Doctors and nurses injured by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: 10% are injured, 7% severely, 2% unable to work - Long COVID is being blamed! UK, US, AUS governments are buying their silence - $100s of millions of dollars are pouring in for "Long COVID" support (6 recent articles reviewed). 10% of healthcare workers are COVID-19 vax injured (and report it as "Long COVID") 7% have serious symptoms or injuries 2% are disabled and unable to work Doctor and nurse sudden deaths are being covered up. UK pouring 50 million & 314 million pounds into "Long COVID" research Australia is putting $50 million US Govt just approved $45 million UK groups are demanding that “Long COVID” is recognized as an “occupational disease” for healthcare workers We will soon start to see a shift towards accepting a figure of 15% Long COVID in the adult population. Maybe even higher. This is what the CDC and Canadian govt are pushing right now. I believe that the governments will ultimately try to buy the silence of all COVID-19 vaccine injured doctors, nurses, and healthcare workers through various “support programs” that will be well funded in the hundreds of millions of dollars. They need doctors to stay compliant and silent to continue selling failed mRNA vaccines to children and pregnant women, and push NEW mRNA vaccines that are about to hit the market (Influenza, RSV) Article Link in photo to avoid shadowban, just re-type the URL into your browser #DiedSuddenly #cdnpoli #ableg

@jeanpartington3 - Sparrow

@MakisMD https://t.co/VjytO2Jd1R

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Substantial Percentages of People Injured by the Jab: "Not Every Vial Is the Same" • Roughly 15% are injured • About 2.5% sustain heart damage • 80% of the deaths with Pfizer come from 30% of the lots • 80% of the deaths with Moderna come from 20% of the lots

Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 15% of people are injured by COVID-19 vaccines, with around 2.5% experiencing heart damage. The pharmaceutical industry suggests that not all vaccine vials are the same. It has been discovered that 80% of deaths from Pfizer vaccines come from 30% of the lots, while 80% of deaths from Moderna vaccines come from 20% of the lots. These lots may have varying concentrations of genetic material and contaminants, affecting their quality. This issue is currently receiving significant attention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The general understanding is roughly 15, 15% of people are injured with the COVID nineteen vaccines. That is a substantial proportion. The understanding is about 2.5% sustained heart damage or heart injury. These are substantial percentages of which we can understand the determinants. There is a lead and is coming through pharmaceutical industry experts, And one of the leads is that not every vial of the vaccine is the same. And it's now understood that 80% of the deaths with of Pfizer occur from 30% of the lots, 80% of the deaths with Moderna come from 20% of the lots. So We know on the biopharmaceutical side that those lots are proxies for either more or less concentration of genetic material probably more of contaminants, other problems with quality impurities. So that's a big focus on this.
Saved - January 1, 2024 at 6:17 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Study Finds COVID Vaccination Independently Associated With Long COVID Syndrome. So it wasn’t safe like they told you. https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/health/study-finds-covid-vaccination-independently-associated-with-long-covid-syndrome-5551931?utm_campaign=app-cc&utm_source=ref_share&utm_medium=app&c=share_gift&pid=iOS_app_share

Study Finds COVID Vaccination Independently Associated With Long COVID Syndrome Developing long COVID appears to be more likely after two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting that the spike protein may contribute to the phenomenon.  theepochtimes.com
Saved - April 4, 2024 at 2:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent issue of the Australian Journal of General Practice discusses Long COVID and its symptoms. The author raises concerns about the potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and Long COVID. They also mention the increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA vaccines. The article suggests that further research is needed to understand the persistence of viral mRNA and protein after vaccination. The Australian government has allocated funds for long COVID research. The author mentions a peptide inhibitor that shows promise in reversing persistent inflammation and reducing viral reservoirs. They express concerns about repeat COVID-19 infections, health deterioration, and various health issues. They believe that those responsible for approving the vaccine without long-term safety data should be held accountable.

@real_GGoswami - Gautam Goswami 🐭

HOLY CRAP!! In the recent issue of Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP), the author talks about #LongCovid and Long COVID sufferers. The author says that Long COVID is a heterogeneous disease. I find it ironic that the symptoms of long COVID the author mentions coincidentally match the adverse reactions (mild or severe) post-COVID-19 vaccine administration as reported in the TGA DAEN. The article mentions that “Long COVID patients present elevated inflammatory biomarkers (e.g. interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, tumour necrosis factor-α)..” Author goes on to say that there is a concern COVID-19 vaccination per se might be contributing to Long COVID. Couple of points the author covers: - “Possible association between COVID-19 vaccination and incidence of POTS in COVID-19 vaccinated individuals though rate that was one-fifth of the incidence of POTS after SARS-CoV-2 infection.” - “Multiple studies have shown an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.” - “mRNA vaccines can result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes and other cells after entry into the circulation.” - I remember being told it stays in the deltoid muscle. - “Recipients of two or more injections of the mRNA vaccines display a class switch to IgG4 antibodies. Abnormally high levels of IgG4 might cause autoimmune diseases, promote cancer growth, autoimmune myocarditis and other IgG 4-related diseases (IgG4-RD) in susceptible individuals.” Note:- Those who wish to read and understand, class switch to IgG4 antibodies, please read this brilliant article written by Dr. @arkmedic https://www.arkmedic.info/p/philadelphia-2023 - “There are clear implications for vaccine boosting where these and similar observations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of long COVID-like symptoms are substantiated, adding further to public health officials’ concerns.” - "Understanding the persistence of viral mRNA and viral protein and their cellular pathological effects after vaccination with and without infection is clearly required." - “Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID.” The Australian government has invested 50 million from the Medical Research Future Fund for long COVID research. Create problem, offer solution. 👇🏽 “An encouraging step forward is the recent discovery in a preclinical model of a peptide inhibitor of nuclear angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 that reverses the persistent inflammation driving long COVID, reduces the latent viral reservoir in monocytes/macrophages and is associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression in monocytes from individuals who have recovered from infection. It also enhances immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical trials are pending.” A storm is brewing. The government (Dept. of health), the GPs, medical service provider(s) know it and soon (if not already) it cannot be controlled and/or ignored anymore. Repeat COVID-19 infections and deterioration of health after each infection, blood test results, spike in cardiac issues (myocarditis, pericarditis, myopericarditis, heart failure, just to name a few), stillbirth, premature birth, spike in cancer cases, unexplained excess deaths in #Australia and #worldwide cannot be ignored anymore. The mainstream medical establishment and the government that mandated (coerced) a product and made Australians choose between health or putting food on the table to support their families will have to face the harsh reality of the harm this product, which was approved without long-term safety data, has caused and will continue to cause. With the immense pressure it will put (if not already) on the health system in years to come, they have no one else to blame but themselves, who, in my opinion, have [knowingly] put millions of unsuspecting Australians in harm’s way. The day of reckoning is coming, and I hope and pray that those who are responsible are held fully accountable. @Jikkyleaks @JesslovesMJK @SenatorRennick @razorback11111 @Kevin_McKernan @DrAseemMalhotra @MaryanneDemasi [Src]: https://www1.racgp.org.au/ajgp/2024/april/long-covid-sufferers-can-take-heart #Covid19VaccineSideEffects #Australia

Philadelphia 2023 Your immune system on the edge. arkmedic.info
Long COVID Sufferers can take heart This article acknowledges the increased knowledge, acceptance and awareness of long COVID but emphasises the need for more guidance on handling and diagnosing long COVID and supporting patients. www1.racgp.org.au
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 2:48 AM

@dystopian_DU - Rebekah Barnett

In a new preprint, scientists found vax spike in monocytes 245 days out. Another new paper suggests spike toxicity from jabs & infections as underlying cause of 'long Covid'. Both support what @P_McCulloughMD has said all along - spike is toxic & can cause long symptoms. https://t.co/KSJr08AkwN

Saved - May 3, 2024 at 5:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The New York Times featured a front page article on COVID-19 vaccine side effects, with thousands of patients and doctors reporting them to the CDC. One doctor, a commercial pilot, experienced a pulmonary thromboembolism after the second shot. The article, while addressing the issue, downplayed important information due to alleged pharmaceutical funding. My apologies for the previous mistake in my post.

@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌

The NT Times did a front page piece about the COVID-19 jabs & sd thousands claim adverse side effects. It’s not just patients . It’s thousands of doctors who reported them to the CDC like w my relative (commercial pilot) who had a pulmonary thromboembolism after the 2nd shot!👇

@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌

Here is the article in its entirety, as they had to address the elephant in the room, but led out so much of the crucial information and downplay it significantly because New York Times is Pharma funded. But it is something. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/03/health/covid-vaccines-side-effects.html

Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is Anyone Listening? All vaccines have at least occasional side effects. But people who say they were injured by Covid vaccines believe their cases have been ignored. nytimes.com

@unhealthytruth - Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌

Left out* my bad. Sorry, kids. I just flew in my mom for Mother’s Day early and lots going on here.

Saved - June 7, 2024 at 7:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The first post accuses Moderna of committing genocide, while the second post accuses both Moderna and Pfizer of the same. A report from @theNASEM discusses the diagnosis, symptoms, and impact of Long COVID, stating that it can cause over 200 symptoms and impair daily function for months or even years after COVID-19 infection.

@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski

You committed genocide, @moderna_tx. https://t.co/1a2xIMAs4z

@moderna_tx - Moderna

In a 2022 survey, 3.4 percent of U.S. adults and 1.3 percent children reported they were experiencing #LongCOVID symptoms. A new report from @theNASEM presents findings about Long COVID diagnosis, symptoms, and impact on daily function — including that Long COVID can cause more than 200 symptoms, and can impair an individual’s ability to work or attend school for six months to two years or more after COVID-19 infection. Read the full report ⬇

@BlackTomThePyr8 - Tom Czerniawski

@moderna_tx You, and @Pfizer, committed genocide. https://t.co/hD0VxhD4Ao

Saved - December 19, 2024 at 10:01 PM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

There is no mainstream medical journal in the world that will dare to publish the Yale research. The journals won't even submit it for peer review. They will reject it out of hand even though the research team and methods are both stellar.

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

New Unreported Truths, on a stunning finding - some people injected with mRNA vaccines appear to make spike protein for years. The reason is unknown but could be because genetic material from the vaccines is integrating with human DNA. https://t.co/m3aOglmHVs

Saved - December 20, 2024 at 3:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some alarming stories that the media seems to be ignoring. A Yale study suggests that genetic material from COVID vaccines may integrate with human DNA, leading to prolonged spike protein presence and potential immunosuppression. There's also concern about upcoming bird flu mRNA injections and a growing distrust among parents regarding vaccine safety. Other posts highlight emotional testimonies about child trafficking, political controversies, and calls for accountability regarding vaccine manufacturers. The narrative around COVID shots is shifting dramatically.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - New evidence suggests genetic material in the COVID shots may INTEGRATE with human DNA. Yale University scientists have discovered that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, but never infected, still had spike protein in their bloodstream YEARS after their last shot. One study participant showed spike protein in their bloodstream more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, while others had spike protein present 450+ days later. The researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators), which points to potential long-term immunosuppression in vaccinated individuals. According to @AlexBerenson, these findings raise the possibility that genetic material from the COVID shots may integrate with human DNA, potentially explaining the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream observed in vaccinated individuals. This unpublished study is led by Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a respected Yale scientist and former strong proponent of COVID vaccines. Dr. Iwasaki had previously dismissed vaccine safety concerns as “absurd” and publicly supported vaccine mandates. However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue. Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications, which could collapse the “safe and effective” narrative propagated by the government and media. As @MidwesternDoc explains: “A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove ‘long vax’ is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it).” As of now, the Yale scientists plan to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server. If the public actually gets a chance to see this, it could change everything. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - Epidemiologist exposes the truth about California’s “bird flu emergency.” @NicHulscher writes, “The Biopharmaceutical Complex is currently preparing bird flu mRNA injections developed by Moderna, CEPI-funded H5N1 replicon (self-amplifying) shots, and Arcturus Therapeutics replicon ‘pandemic’ bird flu injections funded by the U.S. government (BARDA) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.” “Their plans for more sweeping emergency powers and dangerous experimental genetic injections must be stopped. We can’t make the same mistakes as we did with COVID-19.” Read More: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/california-declares-state-of-emergency

California Declares State of Emergency Over H5N1 Bird Flu Just as CDC Reports 'First Severe Case' in Louisiana "All residents are to obey the direction of emergency officials with regard to this emergency in order to protect their safety." petermcculloughmd.substack.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher #8 - NY Governor Kathy Hochul stunned as a reporter demolishes her "subways are safer" lie with an array of devastating crime stats. Credit: @EndWokeness

Video Transcript AI Summary
Statistics show a 42% decrease in crime since 2021, but when comparing to pre-pandemic levels, overall crime is only down 12%. However, murders have increased by 200%, felony assaults by 55%, and burglaries by 140%. Is this considered progress? Are we discussing crime rates statewide, in the city, or specifically in the subway system? I’m referring to crime in the transit system. Would you like to respond to that?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say a lot of things with statistics, and I see the percentage that a crime is down 42% since 2021. But if you look back to pre pandemic, now I know you like to say that that overall crime is down 12% since the pandemic, but murders are up 200%. Felony assault is up 55%, and burglary is up a 140%. So are you saying that this is progress? Are you talking about statewide, city or subway? I'm not crime in the transit system. I'm sorry, governor. Yes, crime in the subway system. Okay. Okay. Do you want to answer that?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Border Czar Tom Homan gets emotional during his new Tucker Carlson interview. “Over half a million children trafficked into this country.” “I've talked to little girls as young as 9, they were r*ped multiple times by members of the cartel. Grown men, crawled upon this little girl, took everything innocent and pure from her. Her life would never be the same. Look in her eyes, there wasn't life in her eyes. It's just little girl's devastated for life, and this happens every day.” Credit: @WallStreetApes

Video Transcript AI Summary
300,000 children are missing, and over half a million are trafficked into the country. The scale of this issue is overwhelming, and the bureaucracy is difficult to navigate. I’ve witnessed horrific scenes in my career, including a tragic incident where 19 people, including a 5-year-old boy, died in a trailer. The boy begged his father for help as he suffocated. I've also spoken to young girls who have been victimized by cartel members, leaving them traumatized. I warned that if Joe Biden won the presidency, border security would deteriorate, leading to increased trafficking and deaths. When President Trump asked if I wanted to help fix the situation, I couldn't refuse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 300,000 missing children. That's something else I've read reference to. Speaker 1: Over half a 1000000 children in traffic into this country. Speaker 0: This problem is just so enormous, and the bureaucracy is so complex and hard to fight, and they always win in the end. Why would you take this job? Speaker 1: I say this many times because of things I've seen in my career. So I grew up in town 25100. I fast forward. I'm sitting in the back I'm standing back with trailer tractor trailer, 19 dead people at my feet that baked to death and back to tractor trailer, including a 5 year old little boy who who suffocated to death. And I I taught him was his father who was trying to protect him. During that investigation, they said that old boy begged his father not to let him die because he wanna see his mom again. Here's a 5 year old boy who knew he was dying and asked for to have help. No. And his dad, you know, his dad can't help him. Right? Speaker 0: No. Speaker 1: I've talked to little girls as young as 9. They were raped multiple times by members of the cartel. Grown men, crawled upon this little girl, took everything innocent and pure from her. Her life would never be the same. Look in her eyes. There wasn't life in her eyes. It's just little girl's devastated for volume, and this happens every day. I wrote an op ed of Fox News, and I says, if Joe Biden wins the presidency, we lose the border. When you lose the border, trafficking of sex trafficking will skyrocket. Child deaths will skyrocket. Migrant deaths will skyrocket. American deaths will skyrocket from drugs from across that border. So when president Trump calls me up, says, you've been complaining about for 4 years. Do you wanna come fix it? How do you say no?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness #6 - CNN shares a devastating poll, revealing that a growing number of parents no longer believe the government’s or media’s lies about vaccines. Video: @Inversionism

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination for children is increasingly viewed as less important, which is concerning. In 2001, 94% believed it was extremely important to vaccinate children, but this dropped to 84% in 2019 and now stands at just 69%. While a majority still supports vaccination, this marks a significant decline of 25 points since the start of the century and a 15-point drop in the last five years. Among Republicans, the decline is even steeper: from 93% in 2001 to 79% in 2019, and now only 54%. This nearly 40-point drop raises alarms among public health officials, indicating a troubling trend rather than a temporary fluctuation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I often look at trends, you know, we come on, we talk about trends. I believe this is one of the more troubling trends that we have seen, that we have covered here. So vaccinate children, highly important, that is extremely very important. We got overall and we got the GOP. They both sort of sort of match each other, but the GOP is even more of a drop off. So overall, you know, back in 2001, 94%, it was extremely or very important to vaccinate children. In 2019, drops to 84%. Look at where we are now, just 69%. Look, it's still the clear majority Right. But it's dropped 25 points since the beginning of the century. It's dropped 15 points in just the last 5 years. Look at Republicans. The top up is even more. Look at this. 93% back in 2,001, 79% in 2019, and then 54%. That is a drop of nearly 40 percentage points since the beginning of the century. Something that I know a lot of public health officials are very very worried about. I mean, that drop is not a blip. Why

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism While you’re here, remember to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism #5 - Catturd Strikes Again: Internet Sensation Roasts RINO Dan Crenshaw in Explosive X/Twitter War @catturd2 https://vigilantnews.com/post/catturd-strikes-again-internet-sensation-roasts-rino-dan-crenshaw-in-explosive-x-twitter-war/

Catturd Strikes Again: Internet Sensation Roasts RINO Dan Crenshaw in Explosive X/Twitter War Wow. Just, wow. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #4 - Fani Willis Disqualified, Removed From Trump Case https://vigilantnews.com/post/fani-willis-disqualified-removed-from-trump-case/

Fani Willis Disqualified, Removed From Trump Case It’s a glorious day. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #3 - Rand Paul Calls for Elon Musk to Be Named Speaker of the House https://vigilantnews.com/post/rand-paul-calls-for-elon-musk-to-be-named-speaker-of-the-house/

Rand Paul Calls for Elon Musk to Be Named Speaker of the House “The Speaker of the House need not be a member of Congress..." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #2 - Top Crime Investigators Believe Luigi Mangione Did NOT Act Alone https://vigilantnews.com/post/top-crime-investigators-believe-luigi-mangione-did-not-act-alone/

Top Crime Investigators Believe Luigi Mangione Did NOT Act Alone Evidence suggests the involvement of at least one accomplice. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 #1 - Neil Cavuto OUT at Fox News After 28 Years: Good Riddance Good riddance! https://vigilantnews.com/post/neil-cavuto-out-at-fox-news-after-28-years/

Neil Cavuto OUT at Fox News After 28 Years Good riddance! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #1 - Ex-CDC Director Calls on Congress to END the Liability Shield for Vaccine Makers https://vigilantnews.com/post/ex-cdc-director-calls-for-congress-to-end-the-liability-shield-for-vaccine-makers/

Ex-CDC Director Calls on Congress to END the Liability Shield for Vaccine Makers This would be a game-changer. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #2 - The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-meat-upgrade-you-didnt-know-you-needed/

The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed When it comes to meat, not all are created equal. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #3 - Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell https://vigilantnews.com/post/cancer-surgeon-drops-ivermectin-bombshell/

Cancer Surgeon Drops Ivermectin Bombshell Can ivermectin treat cancer? Watch Dr. Kathleen Ruddy explain what happened after she observed late-stage cancer patients taking this “miracle drug.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #4 - Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use https://vigilantnews.com/post/donald-trumps-covid-game-changer-finds-surprising-new-use/

Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use As Ivermectin emerges as a cancer treatment, Hydroxychloroquine shows effectiveness against another target disease. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 BONUS #5 - BUSTED: ‘The View’ Co-Host May Face Criminal Investigation https://vigilantnews.com/post/busted-the-view-co-host-may-face-criminal-investigation/

BUSTED: ‘The View’ Co-Host May Face Criminal Investigation The tables have turned. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@NicHulscher @EndWokeness @Inversionism @catturd2 Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go. In other news, a tsunami of devastating reports has come crashing down on the COVID shots. See more details on that below: https://t.co/dOj1a4BR4p

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Tsunami of devastating news crashes down on the COVID jabs. A bombshell study reveals COVID shot vials are loaded with DNA contamination levels 4 to 5 times HIGHER than what regulators allow. But that's just the beginning. Evidence now shows the shots SHED (Peters et al.) and worsen heart conditions over time (hidden Pfizer report). And if that weren’t enough, Pfizer is facing explosive allegations of hiding vaccine-related deaths during its clinical trials (Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan). Dr. Jessica Rose (@JesslovesMJK) has expressed deep concern over the newly confirmed evidence of vaccine shedding, which appears to extend far beyond intimate contact. This conversation is a must-watch. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent studies have raised alarming concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding menstrual irregularities linked to proximity to vaccinated individuals. A survey revealed that many women experienced menstrual issues after being near vaccinated people, with a significant percentage reporting symptoms shortly after exposure. Additionally, new research confirmed the presence of residual DNA in vaccine vials, exceeding safety thresholds, which could have serious implications for health. Reports indicate that heart conditions among vaccinated individuals are worsening over time, and allegations have emerged accusing Pfizer of concealing deaths during vaccine trials. These findings highlight the urgent need for further investigation into the safety and long-term effects of the vaccines, particularly regarding potential shedding and its impact on unvaccinated individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout. It's great to be here with you all again. Since the rollout of the COVID injections, it's been one horror story after another. But this week, the dangerous lethal injections and all of those who've supported them and still support them may just have been hit with a series of wrecking balls that there is no coming back from. The following should infuriate everyone particularly because of the implications for those who went out of their way, lost their jobs, some even lost their homes, and in some cases, their lives to avoid playing Russian roulette with these injections. These people are also now confirmed to be at risk from shedding. Well, now a new study finds concerning evidence of COVID 19 vaccine shedding. So the conspiracy theorists are just right time and time and time again. A new study titled menstrual abnormalities strongly associated with proximity to COVID 19 vaccinated individuals was just published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. In spring of 2021, My Cycle Story launched a secure online survey to which 92.3% of over 6,000 respondents self reported menstrual irregularities occurring after the rollout of the COVID 19 injectables. Each respondent served as her own control because prior to the rollout of the injections, the vast majority had regular menstrual cycles. A subgroup of 3,390 respondents were only indirectly exposed to the injections or the virus. This subgroup reported, 1, being unvaccinated for COVID 19, 2, having had no COVID symptoms, and 3, no positive test for COVID 19. Yet a substantial majority of these women who were only indirectly exposed to the injectables or the infections still had many of the same menstrual abnormalities as the 2,659 women who were directly exposed to an injection or symptoms or tested positive. Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to examine the association, not assuming causation, between abnormal menses experienced after the COVID 19 vaccine rollout by respondents who are only indirectly exposed by some degree of proximity to persons. So this part is very important. The percentage of the indirectly exposed participants who reported being within 6 feet of a COVID injected person was 85.5%. Of these, over 70% had irregular menstrual symptoms within 1 week, and over 50% had irregular menstrual symptoms within just under 3 days after exposure. So when comparing daily proximity to a vaccinated person, the categories of daily within 6 feet outside the household household versus seldom or sometimes daily outside 6 feet had the highest relative risk at 1.34. So let me take you to the layman's terms of this. The study found that women with daily close proximity within 6 feet to vaccinated individuals outside their household had a 34% higher risk of heavier bleeding, a 28% higher risk of menstruation starting over 7 days early, and a 26% higher risk of bleeding lasting more than 7 days. The scientific plausibility for these findings is supported by several key observations which are discussed in the manuscript. The timing and consistency with shedding studies, and you can see, the further information on that, the prolonged presence of vaccine components, documented excretion pathways, alignment with previous studies, and potential mechanisms of action. The authors concluded our findings suggest possible indirect transmission of ingredients or product of the COVID 19 vaccines, presumably through shedding from people who received 1 or more of the COVID 19 injections. But then we have another bombshell which is, of course, linked. A new paper confirms presence of DNA in COVID 19 shot vials settles issues pertaining to DNA quantification methods shows spike persistence and exosomal shuttling or shedding. This is from doctor Jessica Rose. So Ulrik Cammer, Verena Schultz, and Klaus Stegar have just published what might be the paper of the century entitled BioNTech RNA Based COVID 19 Injections Contain Large Amounts of Residual DNA Including an SV 40 promoter enhancer sequence. It got through peer review on the 3rd December 2024 and confirms much of what has already been evidenced and answers many questions lingering in the background. But then on top of that, we also have a hidden Pfizer report that shows heart conditions in the vaccinated are getting worse over time. So the author says I told you here about Pfizer's abstract of its interim report 5 showing at least 23 to 40% higher risk of some heart related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the UK Medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time, in summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer's interim report 5, then no wonder is sitting on it. Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report, but the author has managed to obtain a copy. It looks like the author was right. The detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the hazard ratios in the abstract which he reported last time. To recap, this is a report of a post authorization safety study of Pfizer's COVID vaccine. National regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorization of most new medicines. They provide the data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis matched for things like age and sex to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions. So below are some heart related cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer's full interim report 5. You will immediately notice that the incidence for each type of condition is significantly greater in the COVID vaccinated, but we already knew that from the hazard ratios in the abstract. What's worse is the curves diverge over time, I e the relative incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated increases over the time period of the data in the report. So that's between December 8, 2020 March 21, 2022. Acute cardiovascular injury, 23% times, 23% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 30. And you can see all of these arrhythmias, 27% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 138. Heart failure, 2% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse, though not quite statistically significant at this point on page 146. And stress cardiomyopathy, 30% higher Speaker 1: in the vaccinated and getting Speaker 0: worse, though not yet statistically significant. Vaccinated and getting worse, though not yet statistically significant, page 1 30 53 rather. Coronary artery disease, 40% higher in the vaccinated and getting worse on page 60. Myocarditis, 21 days, a 130% higher in the vaccinated, though not quite statistically significant, page 168. Furthermore, disturbing, Pfizer accused of hiding deaths in COVID 19 vaccine trials. A team of researchers analyzing Pfizer's clinical trial data has accused the pharmaceutical giant of concealing deaths during its COVID 19 vaccine trials. Among the allegations is the failure to disclose the death of a Kansas participant who was part of the BNT 162 b 2 vaccine trial. The death reportedly occurred 41 days after the participant received their second dose. The accusations stem from a detailed report led by doctor Jayanthi Konadasaan, an anesthetist and perioperative physician and a member of the Daily Clout research team. The team alleges that Pfizer's reporting practices during the critical juncture leading to the FDA's emergency use authorization for the vaccine were flawed with significant delays in documenting serious adverse events including deaths. The Pollak paper disclosed 6 deaths, 2 in the BNT 162 b 2 arm and 4 in the placebo arm. In the journal article and the EUA approval documentation, the 6 deaths covered the period of July 27, 2020 through November 14 2020, doctor Koonadasaan wrote in a letter sent to Kansas attorney general, Kris Kobach, who filed a lawsuit against Pfizer. Now we've included all of the details relating to that particular woman, the cover up that ensued, and all of the details you need to know on the Vigilant News Network article. We encourage everyone to read it in full. My concern, and I'm sure the concern of many other people, is this shedding issue and the confirmation of the shedding. And if people are now getting cancer who were not injected, what does that mean for the rest of us? Well, doctor Jessica Rose joins us now to discuss all of this. Doctor Jessica Rose, thank you so much for joining us again. We really appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: It's great to see you. Well, we've just gone over some real bombshells when it comes to the COVID saga. And of course, a lot of this is is, people had suspicions, but more and more we have evidence of, the shedding, the DNA contamination, and specifically your, recent substack relating to the new paper that confirms the presence of DNA in the vials, which settles the issues pertaining to DNA quantification methods, shows the spike persistence and exosomal shuttling or shedding. Talk to us through this, Doctor. Rose, please. Speaker 1: So this paper is really important, timing wise and also because of what they did. It's a very, very thorough study, that answered a lot of pending questions. We've established now, and by we, I mean independent scientists and researchers, that there absolutely is residual DNA in all of the vials that have been tested, the Pfizer and Moderna vials. And so that wasn't really up for, you know, it wasn't really up for debate. What we what we really wanna do is we wanna nail down, the degree of the residual DNA per lot. That would be a really nice thing to do. And, and other things like, how reliable are the quantification methods that have been used by, say, the manufacturers, by the regulatory bodies, and also by us. So these guys actually, they absolutely did find levels of DNA, we'll call it residual, that exceed the EMA guidelines by multiple, multiple folds. And this was after they removed interfering signals from RNA. So these are clean, real DNA signals that far exceed EMA limits. And they were able to establish this conclusion by measuring the DNA in 3 different ways. So this is no this is no shoddy piece of work that they did. The other thing I mean, this is to me, this is not surprising at all. It's it's just another piece in the puzzle that clarifies and provides additional evidence for what we already know. But they also looked at, basically they looked at shedding, whether or not it was a thing between the cells that they transfected. And what they were able to establish was that it absolutely is a thing. Exosomes that are, that are produced within the cells that contain spike protein and other stuff can traffic to other cells and also to the the, in this in this case, the cell culture milieu where you can imagine that because exosomes, their function in let's just talk about the human body for a second, their function in us is to kind of, provide a transformation oh, I'm sorry, a, an information highway between cells and tissues. So they can traffic information in the form of proteins and other things from cell to cell. So what their findings implicate is that when the spike protein is produced inside a transfected cell packaged in, in an exosome, that can be shed outside of that cell, pinched off from the cell, and make it to a neighbor cell or many neighbor cells, which basically means that spike can be brought very efficiently to other cells, to neighboring cells, and also trafficked around the body because exosomes go, you know, everywhere. So the other thing about that is that's that's kind of like the internal shedding, I suppose you could call it. But you can also exhale, exosomes that contain spike protein. So we're talking about shedding from person to person now, Whatever is inside those exosomes. And that's a big question. Speaker 0: Doctor. Rose, if I can just pause you there, people were previously concerned about, let's just say, intimate contact only. But this really shows the possibility of just being near someone that's breathing, really. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's that's exactly right. That's the interpretation of the results. Now the it's it's it's gonna depend on so many things. I mean, if you if you really wanna look at it like, I don't wanna get people thinking that if they're that they have to be afraid to be standing next to someone because everybody got injected. Don't think of it that way. It's like think of it like this. People have colds and flus all the time, and it doesn't prevent you from or it shouldn't prevent you from going outside and living a normal life. You're still, you know, in elevators with people who are coughing and sneezing, and most of the time you're fine. So think of it that way. Like, don't freak out. But, from from a from a biological standpoint, from a design of product standpoint, from an unanswered question prior to injecting billions of people standpoint, we have this on the table right now and we need to we need to do some follow-up research because, like, basically, what we need to do is we need to find out, you know, in the in the exhalation of somebody, let's say, are how many exosomes there are? Are there exosomes? What are they carrying, etcetera? I don't know that it's it's one of the thing the ways that we we can approach this. But, yeah, among the many things that this paper confirmed, that that one that point is, to me, it's it's it's the the best evidence that well, it's not the best. It's just another piece of evidence of shedding that we have. Doctor, Speaker 0: can I ask you about the the for people that don't In the injections, the fact that they found the presence of DNA in the injections? Speaker 1: Oh, I'm sorry. I keep it thinking everybody knows. All right. Well, the most important thing I can say about that is that it's not really supposed to be there. Now there are tolerable levels of DNA that you're allowed to have in, biologic polls like vaccines. However, these products are not conventional vaccines. The the nucleic acids that are being delivered are supposed to be only modified mRNA and, and and no DNA at all. And they're being delivered in, don't forget, in these lipid nanoparticles, and these are absolutely new experimental, efficient nucleic acid delivery systems to cells, to the inside of cells. Okay? So this this is a an efficient and brand new way to deliver this material to cells, and and this a a new level, a new threshold for the, for an acceptable level of, say, DNA delivered that way has has never we that that's not even been well, as long as or as far as we know, it's never been established. It haven't it hasn't even been looked at. We only have thresholds. These EMA thresholds that I mentioned are for naked DNA. So we need to reassess that whole thing. So basically, what I'm saying, I'll just follow that thought and then I'll go back, is that the levels of DNA that they're finding are 4 or 5 times higher than than those already way too high thresholds. If you ask me, there's no limit. There's no amount of DNA that's safe to be delivered in this way because of the downstream repercussions. Speaker 0: Which are? Speaker 1: If which are, in this case, in this paper, they found, all the pieces of DNA that are found in the plasmid that are is used to construct the modified mRNA. And we're talking about an SV 40 promoter enhancer, antibiotic resistance genes, and or an origin of replication, etcetera. So we have all the components that were used in the design of the original plasmid, which which basically just tells the story of where it came from. We already knew that because it had to have come from the the manufacturing process, and this DNA was simply just not removed efficiently, and it was carried over, wrapped up in the lipid nanoparticle to be delivered to you. The implications of this because of the types of DNA that we're finding, this is the most important point, like this SV 40 enhancer, is that specific plasmids or DNA pieces can be trafficked to the nucleus of cells where integration might be able to take place. The SV 40 enhancer is a gene therapy tool. This is documented in the literature, and it's a known thing. We know that it's in the vials, and it is functional. It's actually a gene therapy tool. So if you have let's just give an example. If you have the delivery of a small fragment of d of we'll call it contaminating DNA because it's not supposed to be there. It was delivered to the cell by the LNP by oxidant, and that thing gets integrated inside inside of a gene that's really important, let's just say a tumor suppressor gene, then you're gonna mess up the functionality of that gene, and things can go haywire. You can end up with cancer, for example. Which may Speaker 0: explain the huge rise in cancers. I wanna ask you, though, what about the shedding component where that is concerned? Because we're starting to see reports of even people who never got the injections exploding with cancers. Speaker 1: This needs to be investigated because that goes back to the question of what's actually being trapped in the exosomes. And Kevin McKernan is now on a new, research branch looking at the possibility of other kinds of plasmids being potentially passed from people to people. So this is brand news and it's speculative. So we're we're just we're kind of forming hypotheses now, so it's best not to to say anything conclusive. However, just to go back to the other point, we don't really need integration of a foreign DNA fragment, in order for cancer pathways to ensue. All you need is the introduction of foreign DNA to the cytosol to to start up certain cancer pathways. There's one called the c gas sting pathways. This is by the way, this is all published, which is why, you know, it when you're when you're using gene or I'm sorry, manufacturing processes, like making modified mRNA for use in this way, it's really, really, really important to make sure that you don't have contaminating elements at the end. That's why we purify the mRNA. Get rid of the DNA. Get rid of the lipopolysaccharide that comes with the the or, I'm sorry, the E. Coli bacteria that you use to grow up the plasmids, the DNA, that you want. We measure or by we, you know, the regulators, the manufacturers measure the DNA, the l lipopolysaccharide. They they do all this as par for the course, as part of good manufacturing practices, as part of having a a product that is what they're saying it is. So something along these lines went, went real haywire. Someone's not fessing up. There are some indications that they absolutely knew, you know, that that there was a DNA problem and that they've been cleaning this up as time has gone on, which is not acceptable because, again, the the the downstream effects are unknown. Just like your question, like, are are all of these cancers that are emergent in young, healthy people, for example, who weren't injected, are are are they are they getting injected by proxy? Because you know what I mean? Like, this is one of the questions I asked in my sub stack. It's like, are are we all just kind of introduced to these these elements of the manufacturing process by proxy? Is is that has that happened? I mean, it's it's a very interesting research question. My my answer would be yes. But, you know, you can't just think that something is true because it makes sense. You got to prove it. But I just want to point out on having said that, that none of this none of the onus on proving that these things aren't safe is is is on us. Again, I just want to reiterate this. It's like it's mind boggling to me that that a tiny, tiny handful of people scattered all over the world are the ones who are bringing this information to light. And and thank you as well for for giving us a platform because it's like, this is all the stuff that they were meant to do before. You know, it didn't it didn't matter what emergency there might have been. I mean, this seems like a bigger problem to me, obviously. Speaker 0: About to say this is an infinitely bigger emergency. The potential of, you know, all of us who, people who lost their jobs, people who lost their homes, people who went to extreme lengths to avoid this dangerous injection, now, you know, finding that, oh, what we were concerned about, the things we were called conspiracy theorists for for talking about shedding and talking about these other things. And and now it's all it's all coming to light. I mean, this is insane to me, and I suppose this is, you know, when we when we look at the one of the articles that we just reported on, you know, Pfizer accused of hiding deaths in the in the injection trials. This is also something we were talking about previously where they knew, they knew that women were miscarrying during the trials. They knew that people were dying during the trials, and yet nothing was revealed to the public. It's it this is just insane to me, doctor Rose, and more and more is coming out. And, and and another report that we just covered as well, the Hidden Pfizer report that shows heart conditions in the vaccinated are actually getting worse over time. I mean, it's it's Speaker 1: it's it's every day. I know. I exactly your reaction just now. There's a visceral reaction is is me now. It's like, I don't even understand. I just wrote it today. It's like there was, I think he was 29 or 39. In any case, that's a very young age. A Canadian guy who died of, and I think it was an aortic dissection, which basically means your aorta goes. And this was after he he had some kind of symptoms, probably chest pain. He went to the ER. He waited for 6 hours. Nothing happened. So he went home, and he ended up dying. And I'm like, this is the kind of story I just don't remember hearing before 2021. And now it's, like, every day. And I'm like, okay. It's it's you know, I'm trying to be rational and and calm about this, and it's like, okay. What's changed since you know what I mean? And it's like, how is it possible how is it possible that these these products haven't been removed from the market? Like like, this that's what we do when products look unsafe. It's just what Speaker 0: we I've said it so many times, doctor Rose. A defective head of lettuce turns up, and the whole country removes all the lettuce off the shelves. It's not hard. We're we're out of time today, doctor Rose, but I'm really, really grateful for your commentary. Obviously, I'm gonna continue tracking your research into this. Kevin McKernan doing a fantastic job as well. Please let people know where they can follow your work. Speaker 1: Just go to the the substacks. It's just Jessica 5b3 or just a car, and there's also my Twitter. I I'm I hate to say it, but I seem to post more on Twitter these days. There's more people following me, so I suppose my logic is that I'm gonna reach more people. But I really wonder if that's true. And that's the best love, MJK. Speaker 0: Thank you so much, doctor Rose. We appreciate it, and we'll speak to you again. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me back. Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe, and it's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranches works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table. Why is good rancher's meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in 3 important points. 1, no antibiotics, hormones, or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. 2, steak house quality. The meat truly tastes better and you won't wanna go back. 3, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged, and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it's time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door. Subscribe to any box atgoodranches.comforward/vnn and use promo codevnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon, or ground beef with every order for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranches.comforward/vnn.
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 8:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across alarming findings from a Yale study indicating that vaccinated individuals may retain spike protein in their bloodstream for over 700 days, even without prior infection. This persistence is linked to a drop in CD4 T cells, suggesting potential long-term immunosuppression. The study's implications could challenge the narrative of vaccine safety, leading to internal conflicts about its publication. Additionally, there are concerns about the genetic material in the vaccines potentially integrating with human DNA, raising further questions about their long-term effects.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: New evidence suggests genetic material in the COVID shots may INTEGRATE with human DNA. Yale University scientists have discovered that individuals vaccinated against COVID-19, but never infected, still had spike protein in their bloodstream YEARS after their last shot. One study participant showed spike protein in their bloodstream more than 700 days after their last mRNA shot, while others had spike protein present 450+ days later. The researchers also found a drop in CD4 T cells (key immune system regulators), which points to potential long-term immunosuppression in vaccinated individuals. According to @AlexBerenson, these findings raise the possibility that genetic material from the COVID shots may integrate with human DNA, potentially explaining the prolonged presence of spike protein in the bloodstream observed in vaccinated individuals. This unpublished study is led by Dr. Akiko Iwasaki, a respected Yale scientist and former strong proponent of COVID vaccines. Dr. Iwasaki had previously dismissed vaccine safety concerns as “absurd” and publicly supported vaccine mandates. However, these new findings may have shifted her perspective on the issue. Yale researchers are reportedly facing pressure to suppress the findings due to their explosive implications, which could collapse the “safe and effective” narrative propagated by the government and media. As @MidwesternDoc explains: “A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove ‘long vax’ is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale in a very awkward position if they publish it).” As of now, the Yale scientists plan to publish their study on an unreviewed pre-print server. If the public actually gets a chance to see this, it could change everything.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Yale researchers discovered COVID spike proteins in the blood of individuals who received mRNA vaccines, even up to two years post-vaccination, without prior COVID infection. This raises concerns that the vaccine's genetic material may have integrated with human DNA, leading to ongoing spike protein production. While the findings suggest potential long-term effects, they do not definitively prove genetic integration. The researchers plan to publish their findings on a preprint server and seek validation from an independent lab. These developments could have significant implications for mRNA vaccine safety guidelines affecting over a billion vaccinated individuals. Further details will be shared as the research progresses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yale researchers have found a COVID spike protein in the blood of people never infected with COVID years after they got the mRNA jabs. The spike protein shouldn't be there. It's possible the vaccine's genetic material has integrated with human DNA, causing long term spike protein production. The Yale team will publish its findings soon. Let's talk about this originally published by Alex Branson. Yale University scientists have found COVID spike proteins in the blood of people who received COVID mRNA shots up to 2 years after they received the jabs. The people were never infected with COVID, antibody tests show, and our immune systems rapidly destroy newly produced spike proteins. The findings suggest some people who took the shots may be making the proteins on their own. A possible reason is that genetic material delivered in the shots is integrated with human genes and is continuing to activate protein making structures in our cells. If found to be correct, this explanation has serious implications for the mRNA vaccine safety guidelines and more than 1,000,000,000 people who received mRNA COVID doses. To be clear, the finding does not provide definitive proof of genetic integration or that researchers call transfection. For that, researchers must extract DNA from human cell, find the genetic sequences the vaccine delivers, how frequently the spike protein is appearing, and whether the levels might have clinically significant consequences are also unclear. The researchers have reported finding spike protein on conference calls with participants in their study in October. And again this week, 2 people independently told unreported truths of study findings. The researchers discussed publishing the findings with at least one major peer reviewed journal, a personal with a person with direct knowledge of those discussions said the journal declined. So you're telling me the entire time while they said that there were no spike proteins and that people were not shedding. I had nothing to be worried about. These, mRNA protein vaccines might have been integrating with my DNA in my body, invading the nucleus and somehow, finding its way into the actual structure of who I am as a human being? It's literally disgusting. Now the scientists plan to publish the findings very soon on an unreviewed preprint server so that other researchers and members of the public can see them and discuss their implications. They also intend to send samples to an independent lab for validation, though they do not believe they're mistaken. That's crazy. Now you can read more of that there on his website at thealexbarrinson.substack.com. Shout out to the wellness company who have always sponsored this show faithfully and provided the emergency kits right here that you can get at twc.health/thedailydose. Don't forget to get your kit today with ivermectin, fluconazole, amoxicillin, and all the antibiotics you need. $30 off. Link in the description.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Get your hands on Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and 6 other life-saving meds with TWC’s Medical Emergency Kit. This kit treats over 30 common diseases and could potentially save you thousands from an unexpected ER visit. Click the link below to get yours today. twc.health/dailydose

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Read More: https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-yale-researchers-have-found

URGENT: Yale researchers have found Covid spike protein in the blood of people never infected with Covid - years after they got mRNA jabs The spike proteins shouldn't be there. It's possible that vaccine genetic material has integrated with human DNA, causing long-term spike production. The Yale team will publish its findings soon. alexberenson.substack.com

@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor

🧵We have been in touch with people involved in a Yale study that found: •Free spike protein 700 days after COVID vaccination. •A sustained immunosuppressive CD4 drop. A battle is going on behind the scenes over publishing it. We wanted to wait until Yale buried it to reveal what had been leaked to us (and thereby prove incriminating vaccine data was suppressed) so that we would not interfere with the normal publication process (which is often critical for these types of things to be accepted by the scientific community). In this case, given the people involved and the data given, this study will prove "long vax" is a real condition and that the vaccine needs to be immediately pulled (which hence puts Yale is a very awkward position if they publish it). However, since @AlexBerenson has now disclosed the study, I want to state that: •We can corroborate this study was indeed conducted and had the results I shared here. •The issues the Yale found with free spike in the blood are likely explained by a Jan 2023 study which found those with vaccine myocarditis were unable to produce neutralizing antibodies to the spike protein being produced in their body. •The persistence of the spike protein is likely due to plasmid genomic integration (rather than mRNA integration), which is present in the vaccines (and designed to enter the nucleus) due to manufacturing mistakes. •It may also be due to the fact the mRNA was designed to resist being broken down in the body so that more spike protein could be produced. References for these points are in the thread.

Saved - December 23, 2024 at 5:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a shocking revelation about the TGA, Australia’s drug regulator, which was found to have hidden risks associated with COVID vaccines. Internal emails showed that they were aware foreign DNA from the vaccines could integrate into the human genome, contradicting their public assurances. A senior staffer admitted to being unaware of studies supporting their claims, raising serious concerns about their transparency. Additionally, new research indicates that spike proteins may persist in the blood long after vaccination, intensifying fears about genomic integration. Senator Rennick joined me to discuss these alarming findings.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Drug regulators BUSTED hiding COVID jab risks. Internal emails reveal that the TGA (Australia’s FDA) KNEW that, yes, foreign DNA from the COVID shots really could integrate into the human genome—despite repeatedly assuring the public it was impossible. Rebekkah Barnett (@dystopian_DU) dropped the bombshell report exposing what TGA staff were saying behind closed doors—and it’s nothing like the rosy picture they painted in public. In one email, a TGA staffer debunked Dr. Paul Offit’s claims that DNA from the COVID shots couldn’t integrate into the human genome without an enzyme called integrase. The staffer wrote: “Foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage/repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination.” This directly contradicted the TGA’s official narrative, which repeatedly denied that such genomic integration was even possible. Another email revealed that the TGA wasn’t even aware of studies to back up their public denials. A senior staffer admitted: “I would be uncomfortable with that [statement about plasmid DNA entering the human genome] as I am unaware of studies which have tested this.” So, behind closed doors, they had serious, unanswered questions about DNA contamination and the potential for genomic integration. But to the public, they said, “Everything is fine.” This isn’t how things are supposed to work. Regulators like the TGA are meant to protect people, not withhold critical information. This is yet another shocking example of how the so-called “experts” prioritized controlling the narrative over presenting the facts. Adding to the alarm, new research from Yale has found spike protein lingering in the blood years after individuals received their last COVID shot, making concerns about integration with human DNA even more plausible. @SenatorRennick from Australia joins the show to discuss these damning revelations. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Health authorities and the media have been accused of misleading the public about the safety of COVID injections, with evidence suggesting they concealed adverse event data. Recent emails from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reveal that officials acknowledged the potential for DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines to integrate into human genomes, contradicting their public statements. Despite this, the TGA focused on dispelling public fears rather than investigating risks. Concerns have been raised about the lack of testing for DNA integration and the overall safety of the vaccines. Senator Gerard Renick criticized the TGA for its poor quality assurance and lack of accountability, highlighting the need for greater scrutiny of vaccine safety and the political failures that allowed these issues to persist. The situation reflects broader frustrations with government transparency and public health decisions in Australia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of the top ten stories that were hidden from you this week. It is widely known now that health authorities, politicians, and the legacy media lied about the safety and efficacy of the COVID injections. They purposely hid adverse event data, purposely lied about and hid the fact that these injections were killing people, and furthermore attacked anyone who dared to try to warn people. At this point, anyone still pushing that false narrative about these injections should be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. But what of those who took the shots are still alive and are around those who lost so much in the process of refusing to be part of the grossest medical experiment in history? What happens to their bodies? Well, we have been covering the facts regarding DNA contamination and shedding on this broadcast for some time. Essentially, anyone who managed to survive these lethal injections thus far is potentially facing changes to their DNA that are irreversible and even worse spreading to the rest of the population. So we know that health authorities lied and covered up the dangers, deaths, etcetera associated with the shots. Did they also cover up DNA integration? According to emails obtained under freedom of information from within the therapeutic goods administration in Australia, they did. From Rebecca Barnett, bombshell, Australian drug regulator knows DNA fragments in mRNA vaccines can enter nucleus and integrate into genome, internal emails show. Internal emails from the TGA revealed that the regulator withheld knowledge of DNA contamination risks relating to the mod RNA vaccines from the public, presenting a picture of certainty on safety where there is none. Released under freedom of information, the case of emails shows that high level TGA staff, new elements of the mod RNA vaccines can enter the cell nucleus and integrate into the genome despite the agency's official line that such events are not possible. However, TGA personnel appear more preoccupied with allaying fears in the public than with investigating the potential risks. The highlights here are that TGA staff acknowledge that DNA integration into the genome is possible. The TGA knows that the s v 40 enhancer or promoter in the Pfizer vaccine can drag DNA into the nucleus of the cells. Pfizer did not disclose the s v 40 sequence to the regulator and TGA staff are apparently not aware of any testing for mod RNA or DNA integration into the human genome. Now this is an incredibly detailed substack. We encourage everyone to read it in full. Rebecca Barnett does a fantastic job, but here's a little bit of the background on how we got to this point. On 18th October, the TGA published a statement addressing misinformation about excessive DNA in the mRNA vaccines. The statement came after the release of a report by Canadian virologist doctor David Spiker alleging the presence of synthetic plasma DNA fragments in Australian vials of mod RNA COVID vaccines at levels of up to 145 times the regulatory limit. This, of course, also comes to attention after the, vote by the council of the mining town of Port Hedland calling for an immediate suspension of the injections and we had Councillor MacRae on this broadcast. You would remember that story. Now the TGA statement was littered with false and misleading claim, which Rebecca Barnett has been, has written a substack about and addressed. But emails released under FOI revealed that the TGA knowingly withheld information on DNA contamination risks from the public. Now important to note involved in these communications were staff from the TGA's scientific evaluation branch, toxicology and biological science sections, pharmacovigilance branch, communications team, and even TGA boss professor Tony Lawler showing that personnel at the highest levels are aware of the potential risks associated with synthetic plasmid DNA in the mod RNA shots with thanks to doctor Melissa McCann whose request for all TGA correspondence related to the production of the web page and associated social media posts regarding allegations of DNA contamination in mod RNA vaccines has further exposed the regulators' duplicity on this matter. Now, again, we encourage everyone to read the article in full including all of the email exchanges, but I wanted to highlight this specifically. Initially, one TGA staffer offers the argument touted by US vaccine expert, doctor Paul Offit, and serially quoted by fact checkers including Scientific American, which is that foreign DNA in the mod RNA vaccines cannot integrate with human DNA without the presence of an enzyme called integrase. As integrase is not present in mammalian cells, the argument goes, there is no integration risk. However, TGA colleagues quickly debunked this claim and it is deleted from the draft memo. Quote, foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called nonhomologous end joining or homologous recombination. Exogenous DNA can potentially be incorporated using these processes and you can see that email there. From the biological science section, quote, although unlikely, there are alternative mechanisms for DNA integration. And from a senior toxicologist, quote, we agree with comments raised by BSS that the original dot point on the role of integrators should be deleted. There are papers implying that other enzymes or mechanisms are involved in integrating SARS CoV 2 sequences into the DNA of human cells. In the end, the assertion that DNA integration is not possible is dropped from the memo, replaced with a more nebulous statement about lack of evidence. Quote, there has been no evidence of mRNA vaccines or biological medicines resulting in integration of residual DNA into human DNA genome or causing cancer. However, one staffer admits that he or she does not know of any science to support this statement. Quote, with regard to adding the comment about plasma DNA entering the human genome, I would be uncomfortable with that as I am unaware of studies which have tested this and so personally, I have no experience in the matter. Organizations such as the TGA have become so fat and bloated and extraordinarily compartmentalized that it seems to result in a failure of any single individual being able to discuss topics such these in their entirety, therefore, no specific individual department or person is ever held accountable. We see this quite often with any of these so called experts or representatives fronting up to some sort of hearing, being investigated, and constantly giving answers along the lines of, I'm sorry. I'm not aware of that, or I'll have to take that question unnoticed amongst many other side stepping responses which always result in some sort of plausible deniability. That's certainly been the case every time senator Gerard Rennick and people like him have posed some of these difficult questions to the TGA who seemingly perform a song and dance every time a direct answer is possible. Well, these emails certainly paint a different picture where one could only assume they almost exclusively intently alter information and communications to protect big pharma and all of the health authorities, politicians, and media who continue to lie to the public about the injections. Senator Gerard Renick joins us to discuss now. Senator Gerard Renick, thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: How are you, Maria? Good to see you. Speaker 0: Very well. Thank you. Well, you have been you were at the top of my mind when I read about this TGA bombshell because I know that you've been going harder at the TGA and all of their, I can call them lies, since the beginning pretty much. And you have continuously been given the runaround by this organization when you have asked extremely direct questions. And so, I guess, the the the key takeaways according to Rebecca Barnett here really are that, they the TGA staff have acknowledged that DNA integration into the genome is possible. The TGA knows that the s v 40 enhancer promoter in the Pfizer vaccine can drag DNA into the nucleus of cells. Pfizer did not disclose the s v 40 sequence to the regulator, and TGA staff are not aware of any testing for mod RNA or DNA integration into the human genome. Really interested to hear your thoughts on all of this. Speaker 1: Well, it's just more evidence of the fact that the TGA weren't aware of what they were doing when they decided to approve, the, you know, the mRNA vaccines. Vaccines. Long story short, it's further evidence that Pfizer, I don't think have been completely honest with the TGA. The TGA have relied too heavily on Pfizer, and their testing. And it's not just DNA contamination, it's issues around the safety of the lipids, the duration that the spike protein stays in the body. So it's another nail in the coffin when we're talking about just the poor quality assurance when it comes to rolling out a medical product that was basically, put into the arms of 20,000,000 people, many of whom were coerced to take it in order to keep their jobs. And it's just not acceptable that the people are being forced by their government to take you know, a a vaccine that hasn't been properly tested. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And, particular of particular interest to me was, and I've already highlighted this, but Tuesday, 15th October, a TGA staffer says foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrate in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage slash repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called, and you helped me with this word before, non homologous end joining or homologous recombination. And so the conclusion here is exogenous DNA can potentially be incorporated using these processes, but this was the 15th October, senator Renick, and then the TGA issues, official statements and an interview with SBS News where they're saying, oh, we're combating mis and disinformation, and specifically addressing the fact that, no. No. DNA, DNA integration is is purely misinformation. Well, one of your staffers says, no. Hang on. That can happen. So there's trouble at the TGA, it seems. Speaker 1: Well, there isn't there isn't enough. Well, there's not enough trouble at the CGA in my view. There needs to be a lot more trouble in the form of, well, let's start with Sacking's, but some of these people probably need greater accountability than that. I don't want to get too hot headed in the interview, but, I think we all know what we mean. So, yeah, look, and what's worse is, so not only have they not properly tested the vaccine and conducted, thorough quality assurance checks, they the response on the 18th is typical of the TGA and how they double down, on, on their poor quality assurance in the first place. And that is unacceptable as well, because we've seen it in other examples whereby, you know, the length of the spike protein, you know, we've we I've now come across an autopsy report where the pathologists have said person has died 7 days after the vaccine because they took the vaccine and the TGA never reported that to the Australian public. So, you know, they had an obligation. In my view, if the if if an autopsy is conducted, the pathologist says the vaccine killed the person. Also, I've made some recommendations about putting warning labels on the on the vaccine and the tests that people with certain heart conditions should undertake before they even get the vaccine. The TGA never followed up on any of that, and then they've covered up the death. And then their excuse to me was, well, why did you do that? Oh, we were following the World Health Organization guidelines. Well, the World Health Organization guidelines just say it's very difficult to ascribe ascribe a death to a vaccine. Well, that is a big general motherhood statement, and I don't think it is too diff I mean, you can't it should be the other way around that every death x number of days after taking a vaccine should be considered as a result of the vaccine until proven otherwise. That's the precautionary principle. And in normal medical tests, and as I said to you earlier, you know, I have our own biotech stocks in the past. It's always been the benefit of the doubt lies with you've got to have a pure risk on, process here whereby if anything happens after the person has taken that drug, you've gotta blame you've gotta prove that it wasn't the drug that caused it. It's not the other way around that, no. It was you've gotta prove that the drug caused it. No. You've gotta prove that the drug didn't cause Speaker 0: it, if Speaker 1: that makes any sense. So Of course. And and that's the thing. We had the evidence here here in Australia at least. We were we were quite a good, dataset for looking at the safety of the vaccine because we were locked down for 8 months after the vaccine rollout began. So we don't have the conflation with COVID deaths between May 'twenty 1 December 'twenty 1. And that's really, really important. And we had a jump of 10,000 deaths in the 8 months, which was a jump of just under 10% compared to the prior year. And what's significant about that was that we also had 3 months of lockdowns in New South Wales throughout that period, which would have reduced the death rate. So and no population increase either. So we've got both you know, we understand the biochemistry, we've got things like the DNA contamination, we've got the statistical data showing an increase in deaths, we've got evidence of cover up by the TGA across a range of issues, both statistical autopsy and now with this DNA example. So the evidence has to be that the TGA has not done their job properly and they have caused, yeah, and that poor performance by the TGA in terms of quality assurance testing has resulted in the deaths and injuries of thousands of Australian people. Yeah. As a Speaker 0: bare minimum, we can put it down to incompetence. And and I think that that some of that is evidenced in the sense that, you know, you've got one staff, are there saying, well, I don't really know. I'm not really aware of any of this. I mean, that person does not belong in that role, 1st and foremost. If you don't know about studies when there are countless studies published about the DNA integration, countless studies published about the the dangers of these injections, autopsy findings, myocarditis risks. We're talking about shortening of people's lives in in many instances. Myocarditis is as, you know, calling that a a minor symptom. I don't think so. So so if if a general if a person from the general public can find that information and a TGA staff is just not aware, they don't belong in that role. But then on top of that, you have a staff who's saying, no. Actually, DNA integration is possible. The TGA chooses to omit that, which means that there is a cover up there and publishes something to the to completely opposite of one of their what one of their own staff has said. This is extremely sinister, senator Renick. And I know you've been, you know, really holding this organization accountable for a very long time, but it seems they keep sending you a senator around in circles. How do we really pin them down? Speaker 1: Well, the only way to pin them down really is at the ballot box because I can assure you the 2 major parties in Australia, both the coalition and the Labor party aren't interested in pinning them down because they both supported the rollout of vaccine. Many of the politicians within those parties said on numerous occasions these vaccines are safe and effective even though they had absolutely no idea of what they were talking about, hence why they're covering up their involvement in it. And that's unfortunately, that's the difference between Australia and the United States. You've at least got, hopefully, with the new Trump administration coming in, there is a view that they need to interrogate the safety of these vaccines and really start to scrutinize what took place. And let's hope some of these people like Anthony Fauci are held to account. I know certain other actors in the states are trying to stop that from happening, but let's hope that that does happen. But we need a similar administration here in Australia who is willing to do that. Unfortunately, neither of the major parties are willing to do that, so that leads it up to the minor parties. But we unfortunately don't have the numbers to form government. What we may be able to get after the next election as a result of if we campaign well is to get enough senators in the senate to at least have the balance of power. But the only problem with that is is that because the both major parties agree, we can only ever hold the balance of power when they the major parties disagree. When they do agree, they'll just vote against us en masse and that's what's been happening in the last 3 years. So the incompetence of the TGA is also an extension or as a result of the failure of the politicians to hold these bureaucrats to account. Those politicians should be working for the people, they're not. They're actually actively engaged in covering up for the TGA and for big pharma. And so as a result, many Australians including myself are incredibly frustrated with the sellout by Australian politicians, in protecting both the bureaucrats and big corporations. Speaker 0: Well, Australia is in a very, very dangerous place right now. I mean, we've just had the social media age ban pass in the country. The the absolute insane display of how that all went down at the end of the year, ramming through, I think it was if I'm not mistaken, was it 46 bills that they went to ram through, without any debate really? So Australians are watching along in horror, senator Ranik, of of essentially a completely failed democracy. What effects do you think that the new US administration may have on the country come next year's election? Speaker 1: Well, it's it's going to set an example. And I mean, of course, you know, time will tell with how successful the Trump administration is, and I wish them all the best. I hope they can, you know, clean out the drain, you know, drain the swamp as they say. I hope that can happen, and we need to do the same here in Australia to use an Australian colloquial term that's trying to build a bong over here. The the same needs to happen here. Unfortunately, you know, what's, regardless of your personal views on Donald Trump, what's incredible about Donald Trump is is that he's been able to overcome the establishment, and rise up. I mean, that's what I love about the states and the people, the American people is that, you know, they've always had the guts to stand up to their own government and they really get the idea that it's the people that confers power on the government. Unfortunately, here in Australia, we were set up as a convict colony controlled by a government and many of the Australians are used to government control, and they don't fight back as hard as what they do in the States. I mean, I love my country, but I do get disappointed to have my fellow Australians or some of my fellow Australians don't push back against the government hard enough. And that's the same within, the 2 major parties. They're both a part of the establishment. We don't really have anyone other than Alex Antich and Matt Canavan on the coalition side that's prepared to push back against the establishment. We do need a third way in this country, which I'll admit that's up to myself. I'm one of the people that needs to form. We need to look at a third way whereby we can get a good center right party that can start challenging the 2 major parties. But it's very difficult in Australia because the media will not talk about minor parties unless they do a pile on. And, you know, the minor parties are sometimes their own worst enemy because they'll they'll get too emotional and irrational, and not try and sort of stay stay level headed and and fact based. So and and you've gotta do that more often, and and we need to come back to those economic issues because to me, the the biggest sort of horror show in Australia right now is our economy. We've got record debt, household debt. We've had, you know, the RBA lift interest rates 14 times. Australians are doing it tough. They've been, you know, many of them having to sell their homes. They're either then having to move back in with their parents or they go homeless or they start living out of the caravan. So, and this will be this will be the way to capture the 2 major parties because most people do do think first and foremost how they're gonna make ends meet. I mean, and that's just life. They're aware that government are doing other issues, but we we really need to sort out our economy because nothing controls people more than debt. And if you take go back to the vaccine mandates, many people didn't wanna take those vaccines, but were forced to to keep their jobs. Now had they not had the level of debt they had or not had no debt, maybe a bit of money in the bank, they might have been able to go, well, we we'll see you later, champ. We'll watch. Sit this out, and then we'll you know, once some vaccine mandates are lifted, we'll go and get another job. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 1: Or look for a job that doesn't require vaccines. Speaker 0: People who were who were more financially free were able to make that decision, senator Ranik. That's the point you're making. Speaker 1: Yeah. But here's the thing. Because there was only a small number, if we didn't have such high levels of household debt, that number would have been much higher. And if we had a much higher, number of people saying we're not gonna put up with this crap, suddenly we could have pushed back. And that's one of the problems we're up against. There's a handful of politicians in the senate that will push back, but we're greatly outnumbered. And there were a handful of great people that had the courage to stand up, and I'll speak to many of them who had the courage to stand up and push back against the mandates and say we're not gonna take the vaccine. But unfortunately, it was below 10% of the population even though my view was it was probably about 40% of the population didn't want the vaccine. And that's after, like, the initial, you know, I think I think they might have got to about 60% of people would have got the vaccine. This was early on around May May 21. It was the polls were showing about 60% of the people would get the vaccine and 40% wouldn't. They then did those mandates to get it up to over 90% or so we told. And I think the reason why they did that was that so it's hard to tell. Like, if you had a larger sample of people who are unvaccinated, it would have become, become much easier to dis distinguish between the health of the unvaccinated and the health of the vaccinated as well. Speaker 0: Yes. That's a very good point. Look, I I recognize that, Australia is in a lot of trouble. A lot of countries in the west are in a lot of trouble. Will there be a shift next year depending on the success of the Trump administration or not? I I don't know. It's it's yet to be seen. But, coming from Australia, I can I can say with certainty that a lot of people are absolutely fed up with the way that things are going, and they plan to be a lot more involved in next year's election, and the TGA is a huge part of that? Senator Renick, we wanna thank you for your time and for all of your effort, in holding this organization accountable. You can find senator Renick and follow his work at senatorrenick on x. Thank you again for your time today. Speaker 1: Thanks very much, Maria. Have a great day or evening, I should say. Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe, and it's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranches works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table. Why is Good Ranches meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in 3 important points. 1, no antibiotics, hormones, or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. 2, steakhouse quality. The meat truly tastes better, and you won't wanna go back. 3, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged, and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it's time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door. Subscribe to any box at goodranchers.com/vnn and use promo code vnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon, or ground beef with every order for a year, plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranchers.com/vnn.
Saved - January 7, 2025 at 11:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts highlighting significant stories often overlooked by mainstream media. These include alarming claims about COVID-19 vaccines potentially harming mental health and increasing various health risks. I discussed a heated debate on gender-affirming care, comparisons of January 6th to historical atrocities, and concerns about the FBI's investigation tactics. There were also statistics on migrant crime rates in the UK, Trudeau's resignation, and allegations against Big Pharma regarding cancer treatments. Lastly, I mentioned a controversial government plot involving aerosolized vaccines.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - The COVID “vaccines” damage the brain and DEVASTATE mental health, as confirmed by a recent wave of eye-opening studies. The shots increase your risk of: 1. Ischemic stroke (+44%) 2. Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%) 3. Transient ischemic attack (+67%) 4. Myelitis (+165%) 5. Myasthenia gravis (+71%) 6. Alzheimer’s (+22.5%) 7. Cognitive impairment (+137.7%) 8. Depression (+68.3%) 9. Anxiety disorders (+43.9%) 10. Sleep disorders (+93.4%) Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher writes, “The most probable mechanism behind this damage is likely toxic Spike protein accumulation and persistence in the skull-meninges-brain axis, as evidenced by Rong et al., Morz and Mikami et al., and over 300 other studies, which can be found in the Spike Protein Pathogenicity Research Library.” “Using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic [spike] protein that persists in the body for months to years was one of the worst ideas in human history,” Hulscher says. Follow @NicHulscher and @McCulloughFund for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - Bill Maher and Actor Jon Cryer Get Into a Heated Debate Over Gender-Affirming Care for Kids MAHER: “You can't rewrite the world so that every baby is just a jump ball.” CRYER: “Being left-handed was suppressed for thousands of years amongst human beings … People just stopped training themselves to be right-handed. This has happened societally before, and that's the closest analog that I can think of.” Credit: @TheChiefNerd

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a default setting for humans regarding male and female, but it's important to recognize that not everyone fits into this binary. While we should compassionately support those who don't conform, we also need to acknowledge biological realities. Children often lack the understanding to navigate these complex issues, and no parent desires to face such difficult choices. The perception of being transgender may seem trendy today, but it's not a choice made lightly. The prevalence of gender identity issues can vary by location, potentially influenced by societal acceptance or suppression. This phenomenon can be likened to the historical suppression of left-handedness, which increased once society accepted it as normal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're asking too much often to rewrite like the idea that, when someone is born there is a default setting for humans, male and female, not everyone is. Now, a real conservative would say no, everyone is. I would never say that. Speaker 1: But there are chromosomal cells, there are chromosomal spectrums. There's Speaker 0: a default setting but then there's a whole other Yeah. Other section and that's great and we should protect those people but don't pretend there isn't also a default setting and you can't rewrite the world so that every baby is just a jump ball, oh, could be anything. No, if it's got a dick it's probably a boy And if it's not, we'll we'll deal with that we'll deal with that in a compassionate way. Speaker 1: Well, yeah. Speaker 0: But we'll also be be apprised of the idea that children don't know shit about anything. Yes, sometimes it is obvious and we should address it that way but, I mean, kids, Christ almighty. I mean, the the idea that I would, as a child, would have had to have dealt with something like this? Speaker 1: Well, again, the the people that go through it don't say this is the life I want. No no parent wants to be in the midst of those choices. It's terrible. Speaker 0: These days actually just do wanna be trans. It's a cool job. It's a good thing. Nope. I don't agree. Speaker 1: Come on. I don't agree with Bill Maher. That's the name of the show today. Speaker 0: Well, your your eyes are not Speaker 1: open to that, I think. Speaker 0: I really there are some kids Yeah. Special why is it, like, so much more prevalent, like, here than Indiana? Speaker 1: Well Speaker 0: Are they suppressing it there? Maybe a little. Yeah. There's a societal suppression, Speaker 1: but it's like left handedism. Left handed being left handed was suppressed for, you know, for 1000 of years amongst human beings. But once they it was, you know, apparently in the thirties, scientists basically said there's no there's no left handedness doesn't actually do anything bad. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Left handedness shot up. People just stopped training themselves to be right handed. And this is a this is a you know, this has happened societally before, and that's the that's the closest analog that I can think of.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - The View’s Sunny Hostin compares “January 6” to the Holocaust and slavery, calling it an “atrocity” that must never be forgotten. “You don’t move on because January 6th was an atrocity. It was one of the worst moments in American history.” “And when you think about the worst moments in American history, you know, like World War II, things that happened, you know, like the Holocaust, chattel slavery. We need to never forget because the past becomes prologue if you forget and erase.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to find moral clarity in our country. After January 6th, Mitch McConnell correctly placed the blame on Donald Trump, but many have since backtracked and lost their moral center. Condoleezza Rice suggested we move on from January 6th, but I disagree; it was an atrocity and one of the worst moments in American history. We must remember events like this, alongside historical tragedies such as World War II, the Holocaust, and chattel slavery. Forgetting these events can lead to repeating the past.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What what what do we do? I think we need to find moral clarity, you know, in in this country. And I I I just remember after January 6th you had someone like Mitch McConnell placing the blame on January 6th where it belonged squarely on Donald Trump's shoulders. Mhmm. And then you started seeing people backtrack that and not and losing their moral center. You had Condoleezza Rice, I believe, on this very show saying, you know, we need to move on from January 6th. I say no. You don't move on because January 6th was an atrocity. It was one of the worst moments in American history. And when you when you think about the worst moments in American history, you know, like World War 2, things that happened, you know, like the holocaust, chattel slavery. We need to never forget because past becomes prologue if you forget any race.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - @MikeBenzCyber believes the FBI DELIBERATELY blurred the eyes of the J6 pipe bomber to obscure his identity. He writes, “In 2021, I spent literally hundreds of hours on the Jan 6 pipe bomber. One thing I never published until now still bothers me to this day: I believe the FBI, in addition to nuking the frame rate on the DNC security camera, blurred the eyes so no one could ID based on biometrics.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Migrants 3.5 Times More Likely to Be Arrested For Sex Crimes in UK Than British Citizens New figures released by the UK government have revealed that foreign nationals are twice as likely to be arrested for crimes compared to British citizens, and 3.5 times more likely to be arrested for sexual offences. The statistics were compiled by the Centre for Migration Control using data from police forces, the Home Office and the Office for National Statistics (ONS). “Foreigners were 3.5 times as likely to be arrested for sex offences as British suspects, based on a rate of nearly 165 arrests per 100,000 of the migrant population against 48 per 100,000 for Britons,” reports the Telegraph. Over a quarter (26.1 per cent) of arrests for sexual offences in the first 10 months of last year were foreign migrants, who make up around 9 per cent of the population. Read more via @ModernityNews: https://modernity.news/2025/01/06/migrants-3-5-times-more-likely-to-be-arrested-for-sex-crimes-in-uk-than-british-citizens/

Migrants 3.5 Times More Likely to Be Arrested For Sex Crimes in UK Than British Citizens - modernity In some areas, figure is over 50 per cent. modernity.news

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber While you’re here, remember to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Canadian dictator Justin Trudeau announces resignation in disgrace. @PierrePoilievre responds. “Over the last nine years, all Liberal politicians actively worked to pass into law the job-killing, inflationary carbon tax, a tax that Carney endorsed in his book. “All supported a law quadrupling the tax over the next five years. All voted for or actively supported Trudeau’s out-of-control spending, debt, and immigration. All passed Trudeau’s housing policies that doubled the cost of homes. “All Liberal politicians helped pass catch-and-release bail and house arrest for the most rampant re-offenders, policies that increased violent crime by 50%, gun crime by 116%, and hate crime by 250%. So, given that Liberal MPs and leadership contenders unanimously supported everything Trudeau has done, why dump him now, right before an election? “Have they had a change of heart? Is it because they feel guilty that they doubled housing costs, hiked taxes, unleashed crime, broke immigration, and forced a quarter of the population into poverty? No. They continued supporting Trudeau when he did all of those things. “No. Their only objection is that he is no longer popular enough to win an election and keep them in power. They want to protect their pensions and paychecks by sweeping their hated leader under the rug months before an election to trick you and then do it all over again.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've reflected over the holidays and discussed my future with my family. Any success I've had is due to their support. Last night, I informed my kids of my decision to resign as party leader and prime minister after the party selects a new leader through a competitive process. I asked the president of the Liberal Party to initiate this process. This country deserves a real choice in the next election, and I've realized that if I'm engaged in internal conflicts, I cannot be the best candidate for that election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over the holidays, I've also had a chance to reflect and have had long talks with my family about our future. Throughout the course of my career, any success I have personally achieved has been because of their support and with their encouragement. So last night over dinner, I told my kids about the decision that I'm sharing with you today. I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister, after the party selects its next leader through a robust nationwide competitive process. Last night, I asked the president of the Liberal Party to begin that process. This country deserves a real choice in the next election, and it has become clear to me that if I'm having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Canadians may feel relief with Justin Trudeau's departure, but the Liberal MPs who supported his policies remain in power. They endorsed the inflationary carbon tax, excessive spending, and housing policies that doubled home costs, while also contributing to rising crime rates. Their sudden desire for change is not due to guilt over these issues, but rather a fear of losing their positions in the upcoming election. As the country faces a housing crisis, migrant challenges, and a significant deficit, the Liberals are preoccupied with internal power struggles. A carbon tax election is needed to choose between the costly NDP-Liberal coalition and common-sense conservatives who promise to cut taxes, control spending, and restore safety. The goal is to ensure every hardworking Canadian can afford a decent life in a united Canada.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good day. Canadians desperate to turn the page on this dark chapter in our history might be relieved today that Justin Trudeau is finally leaving. But what has really changed? Every Liberal MP in power today and every potential Liberal leadership contender fighting for the top job helped Justin Trudeau break the country over the last 9 years. All Liberal politicians actively worked to pass into law the job killing inflationary carbon tax, a tax that Carbon Tax Carney endorsed in his book. All supported a law quadrupling the tax over the next 5 years. All voted for or actively supported Trudeau's out of control spending, debt, and immigration. All passed Trudeau's housing policies that doubled the cost of homes. All liberal politicians helped pass catch and release, bail, and house arrest for the most rampant free offenders, policies that increased violent crime 50%, gun crime, 116%, and hate crime, by 2 50%. So given that liberal MPs and leadership contenders unanimously supported everything Trudeau has done, why dump him now right before an election? Have they had a change of heart? Is it because they feel guilty that they doubled housing costs, hiked taxes, unleashed crime, broke immigration, forced a quarter of the population into poverty? No. They continued supporting Trudeau when he did all of those things. No. Their only objection is that he is no longer popular enough to win an election and keep them in power. They want to protect their pensions and paycheck by sweeping their hated leader under the rug months before an election to trick you and then do it all over again. Now, while leaderless Liberals focus on saving their jobs and fighting each other for power, the country spirals out of control, an out of control housing emergency, an out of control migrant crisis, an out of control $62,000,000,000 deficit, not to mention tariff threats from the United States. Oh, and another NDP liberal carbon tax hike kicks in this April 1st. Everything's out of control, and now the government is out of control. This cannot go on. We need a carbon tax election now to choose between the NDP liberal costly coalition that taxes your food, punishes your work, doubles your housing costs, and unleashes crime and drugs in your community, or common sense conservatives who will axe the tax, build the homes, fix the budget, and stop the crime. Canadians can take back control of their lives and their country, take back control of our border, take back control of immigration, take back control of spending, deficits, and inflation, take back control of our streets by locking up criminals, banning drugs, treating addiction, and stopping gun smugglers. We'll cap spending, ax taxes, reward work, build homes, uphold family, stop crimes, secure borders, rearm our forces, restore our freedom and put Canada first, all with one mission: to bring home Canada's promise that every hardworking Canadian gets a powerful paycheck and pension that buys affordable food and homes on safe streets where all are united for the country we know and love Canada first, Canada last, Canada always. Let's bring it home.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - Is Big Pharma suppressing the truth about cancer? Survivor says ‘yes’ Fourteen years ago, Suzy Griswold was diagnosed with thyroid cancer. After following traditional treatments, including surgery, doctors discovered cancer in her lymph nodes and a lung nodule, recommending more surgery, chemo, and radiation. Instead, Griswold turned to Gerson Therapy, a natural approach focused on detoxification and cellular healing. Developed by Dr. Max Gerson during WWII, the therapy emphasized alkalinity and oxygenation, promoting an environment where cells could heal. Griswold claims Gerson tried to introduce his methods in the U.S., but pharmaceutical companies and media interests shut it down to protect their profits. “History repeats itself,” Griswold says, noting similar resistance to alternative therapies today. Read the original story at @BlazeTV: https://www.theblaze.com/shows/relatable/medicine

Is Big Pharma suppressing the truth about cancer? Survivor says ‘yes’ | Blaze Media Fourteen years ago, Suzy Griswold was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, but she didn’t take a traditional treatment route. At first she listened to her doctors and scheduled a surgery to remove the cancer from her thyroid, but after she “completely followed the standard traditional care,” they foun... theblaze.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre #3 - Steve Bannon Slams Elon Musk for Algorithm Changes on X: “This is a Social Credit Score” https://vigilantnews.com/post/steve-bannon-slams-elon-musk-for-algorithm-changes-on-x-this-is-a-social-credit-score/

Steve Bannon Slams Elon Musk for Algorithm Changes on X: “This is a Social Credit Score” The unthinkable is happening. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - COVID-19 mRNA Injections Dose-Dependently Increase Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Up to 121% Risk by Number of Vaccine Doses: 1–2 Doses: Adjusted OR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.08–2.46) → This corresponds to a 63% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. 3–4 Doses: Adjusted OR = 2.04 (95% CI: 1.35–3.08) → This corresponds to a 104% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. 5–7 Doses: Adjusted OR = 2.21 (95% CI: 1.07–4.56) → This corresponds to a 121% increased odds of COVID-19 infection compared to unvaccinated individuals. Read more via @NicHulscher. https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/new-study-covid-19-mrna-injections

NEW STUDY - COVID-19 mRNA Injections Dose-Dependently Increase Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection by Up to 121% Findings reinforce evidence of negative efficacy with repeated doses. petermcculloughmd.substack.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre #1 - Kamala Harris becomes the first woman to certify her own election loss. Credit to @EndWokeness for the funny framing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The state of the vote for the president of the United States is as follows: out of 538 electors, a majority of 270 is needed. Donald J. Trump from Florida received 312 votes, while Kamala D. Harris from California received 226 votes. For vice president, JD Vance from Ohio received 312 votes, and Tim Wells from Minnesota received 226 votes. This announcement serves as the official declaration of the elected president and vice president, each beginning their term on January 20, 2025. The results will be recorded in the journals of the House and Senate. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The state of the vote for the president of the United States as delivered to the president of the senate is as follows. The whole number of the electors appointed to vote for president of the United States is 530 8. Within that whole number, the majority is 270. The votes for president of the United States are as follows. Donald j Trump of the state of Florida has received 312 votes. Kamala d Harris. Carmela d Harris of the state of California has received 226 votes. The whole number of electors appointed to vote for vice president of the United States is 538. Within that whole number, a majority is 270. The votes for vice president of the United States are as follows. JD Vance of the state of Ohio has received 312 votes. Tim Wells of the State of Minnesota has received 226 votes. This announcement of the state of the vote by the president of the senate shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons elected president and vice president of the United States, each for a term, vice president of the United States, each for a term beginning on the 20th day of January 2,025 and shall be entered together with the list of the votes on the journals of the house and the senate. Thank you very much.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre @EndWokeness BONUS #1 - Natural Compounds that Target and Disrupt Bird Flu Infection https://vigilantnews.com/post/natural-compounds-that-target-and-disrupt-bird-flu-infection/

Natural Compounds that Target and Disrupt Bird Flu Infection Getting ahead of unsafe and ineffective government countermeasures. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre @EndWokeness BONUS #2 - Biden Quietly Bans Most Gas-Powered Tankless Water Heaters https://vigilantnews.com/post/biden-quietly-bans-most-gas-powered-tankless-water-heaters/

Biden Quietly Bans Most Gas-Powered Tankless Water Heaters This is actually happening. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre @EndWokeness BONUS #3 - Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use https://vigilantnews.com/post/donald-trumps-covid-game-changer-finds-surprising-new-use/

Donald Trump’s COVID ‘Game-Changer’ Finds Surprising New Use As Ivermectin emerges as a cancer treatment, Hydroxychloroquine shows effectiveness against another target disease. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre @EndWokeness BONUS #4 - Retired U.S. Navy Veteran Exposes the Dark Side of Shellback Initiation https://vigilantnews.com/post/retired-u-s-navy-veteran-exposes-the-dark-side-of-shellback-initiation-a-harrowing-tale-of-hazing-ptsd-and-lifelong-fallout/

Retired U.S. Navy Veteran Exposes the Dark Side of Shellback Initiation: A Harrowing Tale of Hazing, PTSD, and Lifelong Fallout This is disturbing. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre @EndWokeness BONUS #5 - Jordan Peterson: ‘This is the Worst Scandal I’ve Ever Heard Of' https://vigilantnews.com/post/jordan-peterson-this-is-the-worst-scandal-ive-ever-heard-of-on-uk-child-abuse-cover-up/

Jordan Peterson: ‘This is the Worst Scandal I’ve Ever Heard Of’ on UK Child Abuse Cover-Up The UK's response to Pakistani gang abuse faces criticism for victimizing whistleblowers and ignoring allegations. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MikeBenzCyber @PierrePoilievre @EndWokeness Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go. In other news, @JonMFleetwood has exposed a government plot to deploy aerosolized “vaccines” using drones. See more below: https://t.co/44jFBFHhKd

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Exposed: Secret Government Plot to Deploy Aerosolized ‘Vaccines’ Using Drones People on social media are reporting strange symptoms after exposure to a mysterious fog blanketing their areas. This is happening across the U.S. and, as our research shows, in multiple countries. The situation has garnered so much attention that even mainstream media outlets are offering their own explanations. Some witnesses even claim to have spotted drones hovering above the fog. What’s going on here? The similarities to COVID-era controversies might shock you. While Senators like Rand Paul, Ron Johnson, and Roger Marshall have popularized the idea that EcoHealth Alliance’s 2018 DEFUSE proposal to DARPA involved gain-of-function research to make the COVID virus more dangerous, less attention has been given to another alarming aspect of the plan. According to journalist @JonMFleetwood, the same DEFUSE plan talked about “aerosolizing COVID” and using “drones to release these particles.” One chilling excerpt from the DEFUSE proposal reads: “This technology has a potential application in large-area inoculation of animals/humans.” Fleetwood stressed, “That’s us!” He further explained: “There’s a picture that maybe what was actually intended was to outfit drones with spray technology... and use it to release a virus vaccine. The idea is that they created the virus through gain-of-function research and other experiments to make it a self-spreading vaccine that acts like a virus.” “Senators are saying there’s information in there that talks about gain of function on these viruses. And yes, that gain of function did happen,” Fleetwood continued. “If that happened from the DEFUSE proposal, then what else also happened that’s inside the DEFUSE proposal?” Have we been subject to another “Operation Sea Spray” without our consent? This is an eye-opening conversation well worth your time. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Welcome to the first episode of Media Blackout for 2025. The news cycle is already chaotic, with reports of strange fog, drone activity, and warnings of a new pandemic. People are experiencing unusual symptoms after exposure to this fog, which is being linked to drone sightings. Research reveals a DARPA proposal from EcoHealth Alliance discussing aerosolized vaccines and drone deployment for large-scale inoculation. This raises concerns about the origins of COVID-19 and potential government involvement in bioengineering. The increase in military drone funding before the pandemic aligns with these findings. Historical precedents of the U.S. government conducting bio-experiments on citizens add to the alarm. Transparency is urgently needed regarding these developments. For more information, visit johnfleetwood.substack.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to our first episode of media blackout for 2025. So we are just days into the new year and the news cycle is already chaotic and relentless. From strange weather events in the form of what some are calling the Pfizer fog, the drone activity that came in late last year, the warnings of a new pandemic with California already declaring a state of emergency, 2 very strange attacks, and the angling for a continuity of government. Buckle up, folks. It is going to be a wild ride. Now perhaps one of the strangest and potentially extremely sinister things occurring as we speak is the fog. People on social media are reporting strange symptoms after exposure to the fog in their area. This is happening all over the US, and our research shows across multiple countries. It's gotten so much attention that even the MSM is spinning their version of events. But the strange part is people are also reporting that above the thick fog, at times, they can see drones. What is this all about? Well, the similarities to the COVID era may surprise you. The title of the substack is drone spray self spreading COVID 19 vaccine for large area inoculation of humans in diffuse ecohealth slash DARPA project. This is from John Fleetwood's substack. The summary is EcoHealth's diffuse proposal exposed. In 2018, EcoHealth Alliance submitted a proposal to DARPA code named diffuse, outlining plans to deploy aerosolized immune modulators, chimeric spike proteins, and or self spreading vaccines via drones potentially over humans. Aerosolized vaccination on humans, diffuse documents explicitly describe large area aerosol delivery systems for inoculation of animals slash humans, raising the question of whether these plans were executed on unsuspecting populations, drone deployment, and pandemic origin. The diffuse proposal and DARPA's advanced drone program suggests a chilling possibility that drones may have played a role in the COVID 19 pandemic challenging the mainstream lab leak narrative, DARPA's connection to Moderna. By 2012, DARPA was already working with Moderna on RNA based spike protein vaccines. A 2016 Moderna patent contains a genetic sequence with 1 in 3 trillion match to the pandemic virus, igniting claims of bioengineering origins. Suppression of diffuse details. Whistleblower revelations show attempts by DARPA and intelligence agencies to classify and censor diffuse related research. US senators have demanded investigations into these actions. On the self spreading vaccines and gain of function, diffuse documents reveal plans for self disseminating vaccines and host to host therapeutic distribution indicating the potential use of engineered viruses as vaccine delivery systems. Unprecedented drone finding surge, a 26% spike in military drone funding in 2019 aligns with Diffuser's timeline and its drone based aerosol delivery technologies hinting at pre pandemic preparations. International drone use using COVID 19, governments worldwide deployed drones for, quote, unquote, disinfecting, but studies debunk the effectiveness of this practice raising suspicion about the true purpose of these operations. A coordinated bioengineering agenda, the alignment of diffuse DARPA and drone advancements reveal an unsettling intersection of gain of function research, bio weaponized delivery systems, and self spreading vaccines. And finally, the last highlight here is urgent transparency needed. The diffuse project raises alarming questions about the origins of COVID 19, the ethics of aerosolized bioengineering, and the US government's role in these developments. The public deserves truth and accountability, especially considering a potentially incoming bird flu pandemic. This is an incredibly detailed and well researched article, and we encourage everyone to read it in full. Joining us now to discuss this further is the author, John Fleetwood. John Fleetwood, thank you so much for joining us today. I am very much looking forward to this conversation. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Same here. Thank you so much for having me, John, Maria. Speaker 0: Before we get into this madness, please tell people a little bit about yourself. Speaker 1: Sure. So, I am originally from, California. I'm here in Tennessee now. Had to get out of, you know, Newsom country, as terrible as that was. Before the pandemic, I was running a a news website called occonservative.com. And, while I was doing that, finishing up my degree at Liberty University. And, there was a church in Anaheim Hills still there, called Influence. And their head pastor, Phil Hotsonpiller, was putting together a a new conservative news agency. He was looking around and seeing that, Newsom was ordering all the churches to shut down. You couldn't worship, you know, social distancing, all that baloney. But all the box stores could stay open. The liquor stores could stay open. Strip clubs could stay open. And he was seeing the suppression. This was at the beginning of the pandemic. He was seeing the suppression of the, true news that was out there and that Americans wanted to get on the vaccines or about the truth about the origins of COVID. And they weren't being put out by even right wing mainstream sources like Fox News. Even some of the non mainstream sources just weren't reporting the information. So he saw what I was doing on OC conservative, asked me to come on and join, American faith.com. So I was the founding managing editor for American faith.com. I was the the lead editor, the lead writer writing, you know, 12 stories a day plus the having a team of writers under me. We developed this proprietary news reporting. We tried to bring back what Associated Press used to be where they just reported the what, who, when, where, why Right. Without the commentary. So we developed this kind of proprietary style. We gave just all the facts in a bullet form fashion, but we were delivering the information that, again, the mainstream and even non mainstream news sources weren't reporting. I helped bring that up to, I think we're at 3 and a half 1000000 content impressions per day. I was running the the the newsletter that we published Monday through Sunday, 7 days a week. And, we had about 350,000, monthly subscribers. And I cut my teeth going through this was at the beginning of the pandemic. So I cut my teeth going through, PubMed, National Library of Medicine and just searching COVID and vaccine every single day. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And I would take those peer reviewed publications that showed, you know, negative efficacy for the vaccine. That showed the the different, you know, health problems that were related to the vaccine and and trying to report it in a way that people could understand because that's my whole thing on my website right now johnfleitew.com is, I expose how health and political systems have been weaponized against, the American, people. So I left that, started doing my own thing, and now I really get to to drill down into topics that I'm really passionate about. Speaker 0: Well, you've done an absolutely incredible drill down here. I'm encouraging everyone to read your Substack and Full and, in fact, subscribe to it. I think your research is incredible. Let's talk about this this problem because a lot of people have woken up to the, the the crimes of COVID, if you will, but it seems like we'll only go to a certain point. And, of course, there is a reason why they would want you to believe that it was, her lab leak. If there is a a secret program going on, like the one that you've highlighted. So this is very, very interesting. Let's talk about this DARPA program diffuse. Speaker 1: Yeah. So we've got senators like Rand Paul who've who've made popular this idea that there was gain of function research that was done, which you know and your audience will know it just made the COVID virus more deadly, more infectious than it would be in in nature, and that this accidentally leaked out of a lab. And that's sort of the the popular level because remember at first the mainstream was was forcing on us that this, virus came out of nature, this pathogen came out of nature. Well Rand Paul popularized this diffuse proposal from EcoHealth submitted to DARPA before the COVID pandemic. And in that proposal, it specifically outlines gain of function experiments being performed on the COVID virus before the pandemic. But what is not being reported is what else the document says and it's it's it's pretty eye opening what it, what it talks about. And the first thing is that it talks about aerosols. So, yes, the document does talk about performing gain of function on on these COVID pathogens, but it also talks about aerosolizing certain aspects of, of of the, COVID, pathogen. It says in one section, we will trial inoculum delivery methods. I'm reading right from this this diffuse document. On captive bats including a novel automated aerosolization system, transdermal nanoparticle application, and edible adhesive gels. Now this document angles the the the target of their studies as bats. So they say, okay. The these viruses or these aerosol, aerosolized aspects of the COVID components of of COVID. And we'll get to what I mean by that because we can't just say it's it was the virus. They aerosolized the virus or they aerosolized, a vaccine. It's a little more complicated than that. But we know for certain that they were aerosolizing, and the term aerosol comes up multiple times in the document. But it's not just that they were aerosolizing components of COVID. It's that there were also drones. So that first, sort of release batch of this information of the diffuse proposal from EECOHealth to DARPA came out from this, marine whistleblower. Well, after that came out and people started digging into it more, there was a group called US Right TO Know who filed a a FOIA, a Freedom of Information Act request, and they got almost 1500 pages, that gave us even more information about this diffuse project from EcoHealth to DARPA submitted just before the pandemic. And what that one showed is that there were actually drones involved. It's, the file revealed the diffuse plans to use, quote, remote controlled drone technology. Senators like Rand Paul, Senator Ron Johnson, Roger Marshall, they popularized the idea that, yes, the diffuse proposal did involve gain of function, making more dangerous the COVID virus. But what they haven't been popularizing is that the same diffuse plan talked about aerosolizing COVID in some way. And what else they don't talk about and even non mainstream sources haven't talked about yet, is that they wanted to use drones to release these, particles. And, e and, what's even crazier, Maria, is it's not only that. This document also says that the technology would be used for wide large scale application inoculation of animals and humans. There's there's a page that was from Parc, which is a this deep tech company that's a subunit of Xerox. And it it says right here in the the diffuse file, this technology has a potential application in large area inoculation of animals slash humans, that's us, with bioengineered formulations for preemptive reduction of disease transfer. So again, the the the the sort of popular level ideas that the diffuse proposal had as its targets bats. And then Rand Paul says, okay. Well, the main target was bats. They create they did gain a function on this virus and then it accidentally leaked. But what we're we start to see here is that there's a picture that maybe what was actually intended was to outfit drones with spray technology from this park, Xerox company and use it to release, a virus vaccine. So the idea is that, the it's, they're they created the virus through gain of function and other experiments to make it a, self spreading vaccine that acts like a virus. So what what I'm trying to get attention on is that there's a document that senators are saying. There's information in there that talks about gain of function on these these viruses and yes that gain of function did happen. Well, if that happened from the diffuse proposal, then what else also happened that's inside the diffuse proposal? Well, alarmingly, what else is in the diffuse proposal is that they would use a self spreading COVID-nineteen vaccine for large area inoculation namely, vaccination of humans. So what it looks like it could be, Maria, is that they've been using drones to spray a virus vaccine on human populations. And I thought to myself, well, if that's true, then you'd probably see, number 1, increased, like, drone spending for the military. And then you'd also see the use of drones, sort of a weird use of drones, during the pandemic. And that's exactly what you see. The defense department requested almost $10,000,000,000 for unmanned systems and associated technologies for the fiscal year of 2019. And I get that information from drones, dronecenter.bard.edu. But this document says it was a significant inclusion of drone related procurement that the military was doing for research and development for construction funding. The big increase in spending represented a 26%. It was a 26% increase from the 2018 request. And they said this is the greatest quantity of drones the Pentagon has purchased in the last 6 years. So if my if my we'll call it, like a drone theory. If that's true, then you would expect to see a large increase in military spending in drones. And what you get is exactly that, a 26 percent it's more than a quarter more spending than they did for fiscal year 2018 for 2019. So the military did increase its drone spending by an inordinate very significant amount just before the pandemic. You also get the FAA integrating drones into the National Airspace. The FAA, of course, is the Federal Aviation Administration. When the COVID pandemic kicked off in December 2019, it was announced that the FAA had already undertaken actions to, quote, integrate unmanned aircraft systems, UAS or drones, into the National Airspace. This was according to a congressional report from the US Government Accountability Office, the GAO. The FAA, had also, quote, developed plans to allow for increasingly complex operations, including operations over people and beyond visual line of sight. And then it says this GAO report is specified that some of these drone operations would take place over people at night. So the the the very agency in the US that governs all air control, the FAA, just before the pandemic, had created all these new rules for drones, for complex operations of drones that were over people at at night, over citizens at night, which again goes along with this sort of drone dispersal. Speaker 0: And and just of of of late, John, after the whole drone gate nonsense in New Jersey predominantly, we saw an extension of some of these, drone laws plus a proposal to actually, reduce the amount of citizen drone use or regulate citizen drone use because when these and I don't I I think the drones are multipurpose on it, personally. It's not just for this reason, but, you know, once people start realizing these drones are not your friends, surely they'll want to try and counter that. But, oh, oh, we already have laws to stop you from doing that. That's the way that I see all of this. It's interesting, John. I just wanna I wanna back up some of what you're saying. Biotech analyst and former Pfizer employee, Karen Kingston, joined me some time ago. And I was recently alerting people on on, my socials about this interview that we did where it was when when the whole monkeypox thing resurfaced, she came on to my, for an interview with me and she said, well, Maria, they're actually talking about spraying this stuff, and there are documents to prove it. And she's talking about all of the things that you are. She's spoken about the transdermal nanoparticle, you know, and and so what's fascinating about that in that interview, she actually described to us exactly how they have redefined biological warfare to make it so that they can, in fact, infect us with synthetic viruses under the guise of vaccinating populations, and drones happen to be one of those delivery systems. And so this is extremely concerning, John, particularly because all of these people are reporting strange fog everywhere. I'm not saying the 2 are definitely linked, but it seems very odd because, apparently, some of these people are also saying there appear to be drones above the fog. So, quick we're almost out of time here today, but quick thoughts on that. Speaker 1: Yeah. So that that's dead on. And what people need to understand is that the United States has a history of releasing bio or chemical weapons on citizens. You can go back to the 19 fifties with operation LAC, large area coverage. They sprayed a zinc cadmium concoction over over people, and that got people sick. Peep people died. You've got operation sea spray over in San Francisco. They released, bacteria like serratia marcescens in clouds. Yes. I mean, everybody knows San Francisco. Very, you know, foggy, cloudy. Well, they Speaker 0: This was back in the fifties. Right? Speaker 1: This was back in the fifties. They've been doing this ever since the and you could go on. Operation Big Buzz, Operation Big Itch, Operation Big Apple. The United States has a long and deep and terrifying history of of releasing bio of doing bioweapons experimentations on people. There's no reason to think that we've stopped doing that. And finally, Maria, there's there's law that allows them to do this. It's in the PREP Act I just published a couple days ago because I wanted people to understand the government has the power and the ability to, release, drugs or biological agents on people in secret. It's in the PREP Act. It actually gives, not it don't it gives the government and, manufacturers not only a liability protections in case anybody gets harmed by these, but it actually says judges can't dig into it. Congress can't investigate. And when and it it's it's all actuated by them being able to declare these so called emergencies. And the government's given themselves to pa the power to be able to release these, these substances on citizens without them knowing. Speaker 0: Absolutely terrifying, John. I think you and I definitely need to have a deeper conversation about all of this. We appreciate you raising the public's awareness to this on our broadcast. I've just brought up a couple of snapshots of your of your Substack article. People can go and read more about the PREP Act and how it empowers the government to administer drugs or more biological products or even synthetic biological products at this point, John. So the Substack people can go to is johnfleetwood.substack.com. Please let people know where else they can follow your work. Speaker 1: Yeah. Johnfleetwood, dot com. Just johnfleetwood.com. There's no h in John. That can also get people there. They can go on, Twitter at johnmfleetwoodorinstagram@realjohnfleetwood. And, Maria, thank you again so much for having me on. I'm a big fan of your work. Thank you for all you're doing in exposing the truth. Speaker 0: Appreciate you, John. Thank you so much for your time. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: As we welcome a new year, it's time to focus on what matters most, creating healthier habits, enjoying more moments with family, and spending less money on going out to eat. Goodranches.com/vnn is here to help you turn all your resolutions into solutions. When you buy your meat from Good Ranches, you are directly supporting local farms and ranches in the US while skipping imported meat and the hassle of grocery store shopping. During GoodRanch's New Year, New Meat Special, you can subscribe to any box of their high quality, 100% American meat and wild caught seafood. Use promo code v n n, and you'll get $25 off free express shipping and your choice of free ground beef, chicken, or salmon in every order delivered for an entire year. Start 2025 with better choices, better meals, and better moments at home. Remember to visit goodranches.com/vnn and use promo code vnn today for American meat delivered.
Saved - February 19, 2025 at 10:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study reveals the presence of COVID spike protein in blood years after vaccination, raising concerns about potential vaccine injuries. Yale scientists note significant overlap in symptoms between long COVID and post-vaccination syndrome, both linked to the spike protein. Tragic cases, such as writer Heide Ferrer and advocate Beth Mazur, highlight the struggles faced by individuals who experienced severe health issues post-vaccination, with their deaths reported as related to long COVID. Additionally, some findings from the study have been disputed by federal agencies and experts.

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

1) New study find COVID spike protein in blood years after vaccination. NIH spends $1.6B on Long COVID but millions are likely vaccine injured.

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

2) YALE SCIENTISTS: There is considerable overlap in self-reported symptoms between long COVID and post-vaccination syndrome (PVS). Both share exposure to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with inflammatory responses during infection or vaccination https://tinyurl.com/4jz4pct6

Yale Researchers Find COVID Spike Protein in Blood 709 Days After Vaccination, Positing Millions of Long COVID Patients May Actually Be Vaccine Injured NIH has poured $1.6 billion into Long COVID research, but little or nothing to study vaccine harms, causing patient advocates to hide vaccine injury. substack-proxy.glitch.me

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

3) Long COVID patients such as Dawson’s Creek writer Heide Ferrer are hiding vaccine injury. Ferrer took her own life, w/ media reporting it was Long COVID. Her husband later admitted in a private video that after COVID vax “that’s when things turned.”

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

4) #MEAction's Beth Mazur also took her own life following a COVID vax and years of struggle with chronic illness. "Beth was a compassionate advocate for ME/CFS and a fierce advocate for vaccine injury after she experienced this herself sometime before she took her own life."

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

5) Several of the study’s new findings as well as research the authors cite in their paper have been labeled as false by federal agencies, medical experts, and fact checkers. FDA falsely claimed the spike protein does not linger. Researchers found it 709 days after vaccination

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

Read more at @DisInfoChron and please subscribe! https://tinyurl.com/4jz4pct6

Yale Researchers Find COVID Spike Protein in Blood 709 Days After Vaccination, Positing Millions of Long COVID Patients May Actually Be Vaccine Injured NIH has poured $1.6 billion into Long COVID research, but little or nothing to study vaccine harms, causing patient advocates to hide vaccine injury. substack-proxy.glitch.me
Saved - February 21, 2025 at 12:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Jesus. There are many claims about COVID vaccines, and it's important to approach them thoughtfully. I'm critical of scientists at times, but the existence of certain studies shows the relative integrity of Western institutions. Alex's perspective is misleading, and I’ll clarify.

@RichardHanania - Richard Hanania

Jesus.

@RichardHanania - Richard Hanania

There are a lot of claims about covid vaccines out there. Here's how to think about them. https://www.richardhanania.com/p/vaccines-and-the-tightrope-of-progress

Vaccines and the Tightrope of Progress The 99% Good Principle and the Problem with Moderate Vax Skepticism richardhanania.com

@RichardHanania - Richard Hanania

Here.

@RuxandraTeslo - Ruxandra Teslo 🧬

I'm often critical of scientists, but the fact that such studies exist stands testament to the relative lack of corruption and impartiality of Western institutions. Also, Alex is being misleading here. Let me explain 🧵

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

VERY URGENT: Top Yale scientists have found of T-cell exhaustion and prolonged spike protein production in some COVID vaccine recipients - with spike levels INCREASING over time. This is the study I wrote about in December. The preprint is out. It’s very, very worrisome.

Saved - February 26, 2025 at 2:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts highlighting significant stories the media overlooked. One discusses claims by persuasion expert Chase Hughes about the COVID response being a psyop, emphasizing the silencing of dissenting voices. Another reveals how a shadow government operates independently, manipulating public funds. I also noted various reactions in media, including Joy Reid's emotional response to her firing and Don Lemon's confrontation with Megyn Kelly. Lastly, alarming data on rising mortality rates in the U.S. linked to COVID-19 vaccines was presented, alongside a disturbing UK government plot to access encrypted data from iPhone users.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Persuasion expert bets his career on the COVID response being a full-blown psyop. JOE ROGAN: “Do you think that someone sat in a room and that people discussed the best ways to get people to comply?” CHASE HUGHES: “Yes. Oh, yes. I would bet my career because it was executed following textbook protocol.” Hughes explained that the key sign of a psyop is “if the opinion that’s coming out needs people to be silenced.” “So if you can’t question it—if you’re supposed to just go along, it’s a psyop,” Hughes reiterated. During COVID, terms like “disinformation” and “misinformation” flooded the airwaves, but those terms were often weaponized to discredit voices and opinions the government didn’t like. Doctors like Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, respected scientists at Stanford and Harvard, were silenced simply for challenging lockdowns through the Great Barrington Declaration. “And it was openly discussed in emails,” Rogan pointed out. “That’s what’s really crazy. They talked about the strategy of silencing these people, and then you had the actual government itself contacting Twitter, trying to get people removed, which is wild.” They even went as far as to write headlines like “Mocking anti-vaxxers’ COVID deaths is ghoulish, yes — but may be necessary” (LA Times). “My hope is that people have learned from this past four years and that this is an eye-opener,” Rogan said. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
I would bet my career that people sat in a room and discussed the best ways to get people to comply. I even made a YouTube video on how to spot psychological operations. If the opinion that's coming out needs people to be silenced, it's a psyop. If you can't question something and people have to be silenced or publicly shamed for their information, that is a psyop. Public shaming is like the tribe. That's why public speaking is our number one fear - fear of judgment. Harvard doctors were kicked off the internet. The Great Barrington Declaration was silenced and treated like fringe quacks instead of respected physicians. It was openly discussed in emails. The government contacted Twitter trying to get people removed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that someone sat in a room and that people discussed the best ways to get people to comply? Speaker 1: Yes. Oh, yes. I would I would bet my career because it was executed following textbook protocol. And there are these I made a YouTube video on my channel of like how to spot psyops, and there's like 20 different little things. You only need one. One thing, and you can spot whether or not you're standing in the middle of a psyop. That one thing is if the opinion that's coming out needs people to be silenced, it's a SIOP. There's there are psychological operations in play. Wow. Speaker 0: So if you can't question it, if you're supposed to just go along, it's a psyop. Speaker 1: Yeah. And if and if people have to be silenced or or publicly shamed because of their because of their information, and they're not telling people the sky is falling. They're not they're not saying crazy shit. Mhmm. They're just saying basic stuff, and they need to be silenced. That is a No matter what, you can go back in any any time in history during a SIOP of our country, and if people needed to be silenced or shamed publicly, which is like the tribe. Right? That's why public speaking is our number one fear for for humans. It's not a fear of speaking. It's a fear of judgment. Right. So I'm I'm just putting the threat of judgment out there. That is a psyop. So if people have to be silenced, and they were Harvard doctors kicked off of the Internet or kicked off Yeah. Twitter for for this stuff. Speaker 0: Yeah. And and that's Stanford, MIT. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's all you need. Speaker 0: Yeah. The the great Barrington Declaration. People didn't agree with exactly how the government was handling everything, and they were silenced. And they were treated like fringe quacks instead of respected physicians. And it was openly discussed in emails. That's what's really crazy. They they they talked about the strategy of silencing these people. And then you had the actual government itself contacting Twitter, trying to get people removed, which is wild. Speaker 1: Hey. And didn't you didn't you have Mark Zuckerberg on? He talked about Mhmm. Speaker 0: Yeah. Talked about Facebook doing it, about the FBI contacting them. It's it's crazy to believe, but my hope is that people have learned from this past four years and that this is Speaker 1: an Speaker 0: eye opener.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - @DataRepublican stuns Glenn Beck with a blunt explanation of how the shadow government subverts the will of the people. “They’re offended [by DOGE] because their power depends on people not knowing what they’re doing with [our] money. “And so that is truly censorship. Because I think if actual Americans understood what they were doing with our money and that they were actually setting up their own government and actually ignoring what real people wanted to do, oh, we would be so upset. “Because the reality is that these people have a government unto themselves that they’ve created with these NGOs that they run separately from us. “And the reason I’m doing this interview is because I want to promote the knowledge to the public that these people operate in different vocabulary, with different rules, and they have made their own government inside ours with our money.” Nobody’s ever broken it down like this before. Data Republican just pulled back the curtain—and it’s worse than we thought.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not a fan of the term "globalist," but these individuals thrive on censorship and secrecy. Their power relies on preventing people from understanding how they manipulate money. If Americans truly grasped how our funds are used to establish a separate government, ignoring the needs of real people, there would be outrage. These individuals have essentially created their own government within ours, utilizing NGOs and operating by a different set of rules and vocabulary, all funded by our money. My goal here is to expose this reality, highlighting how they function independently within our system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are we gonna be able to stop this? Because I know there's more levels to it than what, you know, we're showing from your research now. All the globalists, and they don't I don't really like that term globalist, but anyway, well, it doesn't matter. But they think they all emphasize this censorship and this secrecy. And the reason why they're offended is because their power depends on people not knowing what they're doing with their money. And so that is truly censorship because I think if actual Americans understood what they were doing with our money and that they were actually setting up their own government and actually ignoring what real people wanted to do, ugh, we would be so upset because the reality is that the these people have a government unto themselves that they've created with these NGOs that they run separately from us. And the reason I'm doing this interview is because I wanna promote the knowledge to the public that these people operate in different vocabulary with different rules and they have made their own government inside ours with our money.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican #8 - Democrats are flailing over Musk & DOGE gaining access to IRS data. But in 2023, Joe Biden gave 53 unpaid researchers & student volunteers access to the SAME SYSTEM & they said NOTHING. Credit: @ByronDonalds

Video Transcript AI Summary
The massive bloat in government spending allows politicians to hide their pet projects. For example, Stacey Abrams' climate group, with a revenue of only $100, is slated to receive $2 billion. There's outrage over Elon Musk's team accessing IRS data, yet the Biden administration allowed 53 unpaid researchers and students full access to the American people's data at the IRS. They're okay with waste, fraud, and abuse as long as their special interest groups are funded and their ideology is promoted, regardless of the will of the American people. Our country can't survive this. We are thankful that Donald Trump and his team are saying enough is enough and will begin the process of restoring a constitutional republic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with this very simple thing. They love the massive bloat in waste because it's like you said, Mark, they get to fit all of their little pet projects underneath the covers where nobody can see it. You got Stacey Abrams and one of her climate funk groups is supposed to get $2,000,000,000 when if you look at their tax returns, their revenue is only a hundred dollars, and they're getting $2,000,000,000. This is the kind of stuff. They're so upset about Elon Musk and the Doge team having access to the internal revenue service data into the treasury payment system. But there's a g there's a report that came out the other day that under Joe Biden, he let 53 researchers and students, unpaid people, go in and actually have full access to the data of the American people at the IRS. Joe Biden's administration let that happen. So they have no problem with the waste and the fraud and the abuse as long as their special interest groups are being funded and their ideology is being promoted regardless of the will of the American people. But our country can't simply survive that. We are very thankful that Donald Trump and his team are saying enough is enough. They are going to save this nation for the American people and begin the process of restoring a constitutional republic.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #7 - Joy Reid breaks down in tears after MSNBC firing. “My show had value!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm sorry for getting emotional, but my show mattered. I'm grateful. I felt guilty for addressing tough issues, from Black Lives Matter to the targeting of Asian Americans, defending immigrants, questioning the president, defending inconvenient books, understanding 1619, and speaking about Gaza. I'm not sorry for standing up for these issues. As a church girl, I believe these values are of God. I'm proud of my show.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My show had value and that I'm sorry. That, that what I was doing had value had value. And in the end I'm sorry. I'm not I try not to cry on TV, and I take this is kinda like me on TV, so I apologize. And that and that it kind of and then it mattered. I see Karen is there, and she's been texting me as well. And so what I will just say is that in the end thank you. Where I land is that the moment that I of guilt that I felt that I went hard on so many issues, whether it was the Black Lives Matter issues of a young baby, or a mom or a dad that was killed, or, when we opened up people's eyes to the fact that Asian Americans were being targeted and not just black folks that or went hard for immigrants who've done nothing but come to this country like my parents did and try to make a life and defended them, or whether we've talked about what the president is doing that is subversive to the constitution, that is injurious to our liberty, you know, defending books that people find inconvenient, you know, that Nicole Hannah Jones put into our spirit that we need to understand 1619 as the real founding of this country, whether it's talking about any of these issues. And and, yes, whether it's talking about Gaza and the fact that we as the American people have a right to object to have a right to object to little babies being bombed. And and where I come down on that is I'm not sorry. I am not sorry that I stood up for those those things because those things are of God. And and, you know, I'm a church girl too, and those the those are the things that I was taught were of God. And so I I'm not sorry. I'm just proud of my show.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #6 - Karoline Leavitt warns Washington bureaucrats that they should be “nervous” over Dan Bongino’s FBI nomination. “We often see that when outsiders are appointed to such coveted positions, a lot of people in this city get very, very nervous. And they should be...”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to highlight the exceptional qualities of this individual, who brings a wealth of experience from his time at the FBI and the Secret Service. He is a dedicated patriot who has served our nation with distinction. His understanding of the deep-seated corruption within these institutions is precisely why President Trump sought him out to drive change. It's disheartening to witness attempts to mislabel him. He is a former law enforcement officer and Secret Service agent who risked his life for this country. The president has entrusted him with this crucial role because he's an outsider to the Washington swamp, and his appointment, along with others, signals a commitment to rooting out corruption and ending the weaponization of government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When he talks about the, past corruption at the FBI, when he talks about his experience, serving, for the United States Secret Service. This is a man who loves his country and who has honorably served our country in ways that many people have not. He understands the depth of the corruption at these institutions, which the American people reelected president Trump to shake up. And I think it's quite despicable to see many networks in this room who have had chyrons on their television screens labeling mister Bongino as a far right podcaster. He is not. He is a former, law enforcement, agent. He is a former secret service agent who put his life on the line to protect this country, and that is why the president of The United States has entrusted him for this important role. He's also, an outsider to this Washington swamp, and we often see that when outsiders are appointed, to such coveted positions, a lot of people in this city get very, very nervous, and they should be because Dan Bongino and Kash Patel and attorney general Bondi are focused on rooting out the corruption at these agencies and ending the weaponization of government once and for all.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds While you’re here, don’t forget to follow me (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #5 - Don Lemon tells Megyn Kelly to F off. “Let me just say to Megyn Kelly, in my 30-some years as a journalist and my 50-some years as a person of color, go f**k yourself.” Credit: @TheChiefNerd

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a journalist for over 30 years and a person of color for over 50 years, I want to say to Megyn Kelly, go yourself. I typically avoid discussing her because she thrives on attention and has built the latter part of her career on being a troll.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let me just say to Megyn Kelly, in my thirty some years as a journalist and my fifty some years as a person of color, go yourself. Okay? I usually don't like to talk about her because she's one of those people. She thrives on it. She has built her the second part of whatever of her career on being a troll.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #4 - FBI Whistleblower Drops a Disturbing Bombshell on Kash Patel and Dan Bongino https://vigilantnews.com/post/deep-state-in-panic-whistleblower-says-fbi-is-deleting-damning-evidence-even-musk-cant-save/

FBI Whistleblower Drops a Disturbing Bombshell on Kash Patel and Dan Bongino The rabbit hole just got deeper. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #3 - Maddow DETONATES: Slams MSNBC as Racist in Jaw-Dropping Rant https://vigilantnews.com/post/maddow-detonates-slams-msnbc-as-racist-in-jaw-dropping-rant/

Maddow DETONATES: Slams MSNBC as Racist in Jaw-Dropping Rant Is Rachel Maddow next on the chopping block? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #2 - AI Robot ‘Attacks’ Crowd in China https://vigilantnews.com/post/watch-ai-robot-attacks-crowd-in-china/

Watch: AI Robot ‘Attacks’ Crowd in China Creepy as hell. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - The U.S. is facing a full-blown mortality crisis, and insurance data shows it’s worse than anyone thought. Life expectancy in the U.S. is now worse than it was a decade ago. Josh Stirling, founder of the Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives, says mortality rates are alarmingly high, especially for younger age groups. Why? The evidence points to the COVID-19 vaccines, says Epidemiologist Nic Hulscher. Here’s his breakdown: Cardiac deaths up 8-36%: The largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study ever conducted (99 million vaccinated individuals) found myocarditis risk surges up to 610% post-mRNA injection. Subclinical vaccine-induced myopericarditis may trigger reentrant ventricular tachycardia or spontaneous ventricular fibrillation, leading to sudden cardiac death. Our King County, WA study and @EthicalSkeptic analysis of CDC data confirm excess sudden cardiac deaths skyrocketed after mass mRNA injection. Neurological deaths up 16-39%: mRNA injections linked to Ischemic stroke (+44%), Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%), Transient ischemic attack (+67%), Myelitis (+165%), Myasthenia gravis (+71%), Alzheimer’s (+22.5%), Cognitive impairment (+138%), Depression (+68.3%), Anxiety disorders (+43.9%), Sleep disorders (+93.4%)—the neurological toll is undeniable. Cancer rates up 10-50%: CDC data, peer-reviewed studies, and population-level analyses suggest COVID-19 mRNA injections are likely carcinogenic, contributing to rising cancer cases. Ethical Skeptic's analysis of CDC data shows excess cancer mortality up 9% post-mRNA rollout. Studies suggest mRNA injections may impair immune surveillance, hinder DNA repair, and accelerate tumor growth—fulfilling the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Case reports link the shots to aggressive cancers, including intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. The surge in post-vaccine cancer cases demands urgent investigation. “These data suggest that the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign is a primary driver of the collapse in U.S. life expectancy, preventing its full recovery,” Hulscher concluded. “Urgent intervention by the federal government is indicated to immediately remove these life-reducing injections from the market and begin steps to reverse these negative trends.” Follow @NicHulscher for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #1 - Man Loses 300 Pounds on Carnivore Diet Rejected by MDs https://www.theepochtimes.com/bright/i-only-eat-eggs-bacon-beef-720-pound-man-loses-300-pounds-on-carnivore-diet-rejected-by-mds-5636989?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf

‘I Only Eat Eggs, Bacon, Beef’: 720-Pound Man Loses 300 Pounds on Carnivore Diet Rejected by MDs theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #2 - Why Your Doctor Is Probably Wrong About Cholesterol https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/why-dietary-cholesterol-isnt-the-enemy-5796165?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf

Why Dietary Cholesterol Isn’t the Enemy Research shows dietary cholesterol has little impact on blood cholesterol. So what really affects it? theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #3 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #4 - Top Doctor Reveals Simple Formula to Prevent 80 Percent of Chronic Diseases https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/a-doctors-simple-formula-to-prevent-80-percent-of-chronic-diseases-5789789?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf

A Doctor’s Simple Formula to Prevent 80 Percent of Chronic Diseases A Yale-graduate doctor discusses how lessons learned from our ancestors can help us live longer, better lives. theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #5 - How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/fluoride-free-your-guide-to-water-filtration-and-health-5741827?utm_source=prtnrhard&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=prtnrhard&src_cmp=vigilantf

How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home Since 1945, fluoride has been added to public drinking water supplies, but research has shown it may pose risks to our health. theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more posts like this one. In other news, the UK government just got BUSTED in a secret plot to extract your data. Read more below:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. @sayerjigmi has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: https://www.change.org/p/urge-elevate-prize-foundation-to-reexamine-award-for-imran-ahmed (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Governments worldwide are following a totalitarian control agenda outlined in the Rockefeller Foundation's "Lockstep" document. The UK government, in particular, is leading the charge, secretly ordering Apple to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data, affecting 2 billion users worldwide. This order, issued under the Investigatory Powers Act, is a global privacy nightmare. Apple faces a difficult choice: comply and weaken encryption globally, or withdraw services from the UK. This move ties into a broader censorship agenda, including the UK's Online Safety Bill and the EU's Digital Services Act, which criminalize dissent and censor free speech. Governments are using tech companies as enforcement arms, threatening citizens for online criticism, highlighting a war on encryption and control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout, and, boy, do we have some shocking stories for you today. The previous US administration, Australian, Canadian, UK governments, and EU have been following the Rockefeller lockstep document to a t, including the part that happens after the pandemic despite mass awareness and rejection of this agenda. For those that aren't aware of this document, it is titled scenarios for the future of technology and international development published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 and basically outlines exactly how governments in lockstep will gain totalitarian control through a virus and practices adopted during the virus that will continue and, in fact, intensify after the, quote, unquote, pandemic. To quote from the document itself, lockstep, a world of tighter top down government control and more authoritarian leadership with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback. It goes on to say, even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty and their privacy to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant and even eager for top down direction and oversight, and national leaders have had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms, biometric IDs for all citizens, for example. And, of course, we have seen this very nightmare scenario continuing to play out. Perhaps one of the most egregious examples is in The UK where in recent times, the government has become so drunk with maddening power that they are imprisoning people for mean tweets, scouring the corners of the Internet for even the slightest criticism of their authoritarian regime and policies. But a new order from the UK government to Apple may have just been the step too far that will change the course of some of this. From Sayo g breaking, The UK just ordered Apple to kill encryption for 2,000,000,000 people, and they can't even talk about it. A global privacy nightmare is unfolding. The UK government secretly ordered Apple to backdoor encrypted iCloud storage worldwide, but Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order, or they could face criminal charges. Now this affects 2,000,000,000 users, but the point is that they wanted access to worldwide data. So this extends far beyond The UK. And interestingly, Sayer's account was hacked right after Elon retweeted his post raising awareness to this. Under The UK's Investigatory Powers Act 2016, Apple was served a technical capability notice or TCN, forcing them to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data. This is not limited to UK users. As we said before, it actually applies worldwide, meaning your private files are at risk no matter where you live. Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order. If Apple even acknowledges that The UK issued this demand, they could face criminal charges. This is a secret government order with global consequences. And it's not just about The UK, although they are leading the charge in threatening citizens in other countries for violating British censorship laws. You would remember the threats that came from The UK Police Commissioner where they said that they would threaten to extradite and jail US citizens over their online posts. Now Apple's choices are to either comply and weaken encryption globally or refuse and withdraw services from The UK. WhatsApp and Signal faced similar threats last year and vowed to leave The UK rather than compromise security. And this was, of course, after The UK passed the Online Safety Act, bill or The UK Online Safety Bill. Encryption protects financial data and health records and personal security, for example, where you live or work, and also private conversations. So this matters for everyone. Governments always say they need backdoors for national security, but history shows they're just used for mass surveillance. And once a backdoor exists, hackers, rogue employees, and other governments will find it. The UK is trying to dominate the global surveillance and censorship landscape. UK is obviously part of Five Eyes, but notably, The US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have supported strong encryption to mitigate cyber threats. But The UK stands alone in its war on encryption. And it's not just about encryption, though. It is about control. And governments worldwide are criminalizing dissent and censoring free speech using tech companies as their enforcement arms. And this ties into The UK's broader globally orchestrated census ship agenda, which is the online safety bill. It criminalizes encrypted messaging and forces platforms to scan private messages. The Digital Services Act in the EU gives governments the power to shut down online content they don't like, and leaked US UK documents show direct coordination between UK intelligence and the Biden administration to censor online speech. So, obviously, Apple has a very difficult decision to make, and in fact, they have made one. Sayagyi has an update on this as well as the backstory. He joins us now. Sayagyi, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. Speaker 0: Well, this story is absolutely shocking along with what happened to you and the update. So pardon me. We've just gone through a bit of a backstory there about what the UK government wanted access to. And, really, this all started with the Online Safety Act of 2023, and they've been very, you know, incrementally creeping into people's lives. But now we have an update as to Apple's response. Talk us through it. Speaker 1: Well, you know, we had a situation February 8 where The Wall Street Journal published what was supposed to be a very private matter, which was the UK government was compelling Apple to basically create a backdoor so they could access the world's encrypted iCloud data. So any any country in the world, theoretically, the UK government would have had access to the advanced data protection services they offer, which most people don't use, but at least gave users the ability to have their key stored offline. So, you know, you don't have to trust that Apple or a government is playing by the rules and keeping your data safe and private. Speaker 0: Right. And so Apple wasn't even allowed to talk about this. And then The UK sorry. Apple could've was was given two options, basically. Do they just withdraw all of their services altogether out of The UK, or do they remove advanced data protection? So talk to us about the response from Apple. Speaker 1: Yeah. The crazy thing is, right, The UK's investigatory powers act of 02/2016 basically enabled them to say, Apple, you cannot even share the fact that we're gonna basically force you to create a backdoor into the world's ostensibly encrypted data. So it was leaked, and, thankfully, The Wall Street Journal got it out. In fact, as you know, on February 8, Elon retweeted my post about it because he said this is crazy. This is absolutely insane because people just don't realize that the governments of the world have this ability, and The UK is obviously the one leading the charge as far as tyrannical overreach and and laying claim to your communications as well as actually adjudicating and criminalizing certain speech, which were is protected here in this country. But their UK online safety bill actually gives them, in theory, extradition power so they could basically say, as a US citizen, you're violating our UK speech laws, and we're gonna prosecute you prosecute you. They even stated that recently. A UK Police Commissioner threatened to extradite US citizens over online posts. He said, we'll come after you. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I I remember that. And then The US response was basically shove it. We have a First Amendment. But, you know, other people across the world don't have those same protections, so they were talking about extraditing people from other countries as well. And, of course, we have a precedent set with the case of Julian Assange when it comes to extraditing people to to foreign countries all within this Five Eyes network, it seems. So talk to us about that link and how this is all sort of creeping into that entire Five Eyes network. Speaker 1: Absolutely. So the Five Eyes network is a really big concern here because, essentially, if I'm a US citizen, I go to The UK. At this point, my if I upload something to the cloud, The UK Government has access to all of that. So there's no protection. Now there could have been protection with the advanced data protection services, which are now gone, and The UK can share that with The US, and that's the intelligence sharing agreements among the Five Eyes nations. Right? Australia, New Zealand, Canada, The US, and The UK, essentially violating all of our civil rights, our privacy protections, and our constitution here in The US. So that's been ongoing. Now that this issue has come out to the forefront, I think it's really important for people to appreciate how important, for example, x is in helping to wrench back some of these rights and give us a platform to speak truthfully. That said, they're noting everything that's being said, and they're trying to use that as a way to essentially, again, criminalize free speech. Speaker 0: Yes. You're right. And it's kind of a double edged sword because what you say will be used against you. But at the same time, if you don't speak about it, then it'll be used against you anyway. So the the I for for me, the option's always bravery. But I'm interested in your thoughts about how Apple responded because they really were faced with these two very difficult options. And, essentially, people are saying they should have just pulled out their service from The UK, and people would have been outraged at this. And then they could have, you know, protested and maybe repealed some of these laws or, you know, whatever measures the the citizens of The UK could have taken are now essentially being taken away from them. They don't even have an option for privacy, albeit the advanced data protection was not used that much. But without that, then, essentially, there's no encrypt encryption anyway, so it kind of allows governments to use the data anyway now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. So WhatsApp and Signal already threatened to leave The UK if something similar was forced upon them. And so I think Apple made the right decision. If they had pulled all iCloud services from The UK, I think that would have probably crashed their civilization for quite some time. But I do think that they may have not done a good enough job of of really pushing back and and speaking openly about this because the gag order, you know, that that is imposed upon them is so egregious that they they would have potentially given access to the world's encrypted data and violated the law if they spoke up about it. Well, at this point, you know, we had to all face being deplatformed or worse by speaking up about some of the nightmares that unfolded with the COVID, you know, you know, pandemic, if you will. And now entire big tech corporations, multinationals are having to do the same as well. So it's really quite a moment for us all to be in the same you know, we're in the same boat here. We all have to do something, corporations, individuals, to stop, as you said, bravery is the solution, this insane reenactment of seditious libel. You know? The crown is literally trying to exert total control over the world and over speech and turning it into a weapon against the people, that's similar to having your tongue cut out or your head cut off for speaking against the government narrative. You know? That's where we're at right now. Speaker 0: We are. The and we see, you know, insane laws across every single western nation except The US, really. Australia's recent hate speech laws, now they're bringing in anti vilification laws across states. Basically, now if someone says something that someone deems offensive, they can go to prison. There is a new, bill that was introduced again without debate. Seven years mandatory sentence if you say something, quote, unquote, reckless. It's it's it's really unbelievable. And what's interesting about this UK case, Sayer, is that The UK Investigatory Powers Act of 02/2016 was used in order for the British government to issue this secret order to Apple that they weren't even allowed to talk about. What what I find so fascinating about this is how long this has been in the works. That means that back in 02/2016, someone, some lawmaker said, you know, we're gonna be able to use this legislation later to weaponize. Look how look how far ahead they planned. This is nine years ago. And so I think the the point is that people really need to pay attention to some of these laws that are being introduced. You and I have previously spoken about the COSA legislation in The United States. We have to be aware of these laws and oppose them so that they can't be weaponized against us nine years later. Speaker 1: Absolutely. I'm glad you bring a COSA because it turns out that one of the primary proponents and, if you will, backdoor architects of COSA is the same organization that was behind the online safety bill, which is the Center for Countering Digital Hate. So, basically, this organization, their CEO, Imram Ahmed, literally was found in a leaked memo to have been involved in setting a black ops, these are his words, on a presidential candidate, which is RFK junior, are now acting, you know, HHS secretary. That is such an egregious thing for for it to have been discovered. In fact, CCDH was also involved in placing political operatives in this country through Morgan McSweeney, their founder, who was a a, you know, adviser to Kirstarmer as well as to the to Harris. So we have the infiltration of our, you know, election integrity, you know, political process that that actually goes back to 02/2021. This is the one report that has not been discussed in the mainstream media that, thankfully, because of your journalism and Vigilant Fox and others, the information is getting out. But there was an America First legal lawsuit against the CDC which discovered that in 02/2021, the UK's counter disinformation unit gave a interagency master class on censorship, right, to the US National Security Council's interagency policy committee. The FBI, CISA was there, USAID, army, navy. I mean, you you can't make this stuff up. And they literally decided they were gonna deploy what is essentially a weapons grade AI system that was, used in, for example, Twitter Twitter one point o to, automatically, track, you know, the the speech of every single user and then start start associating terms like questioning mass with the word Nazi, basically labeling that anti Semitic speech, and then just deplatforming people automatically. Anyone with 5,000 followers or less. This was going on. Millions of Americans had their speech suppressed and their, you know, behavior tracked. It's probably still in the dossier somewhere, right, by the UK government. They literally infected our executive branch and then deployed these weapons grade systems in the big tech stack that essentially violated the rights of all Americans, not just the so called disinfo dozen, which I'm proud to be on the list now. And so this is what was going on. They were literally trying to take over our government. They succeeded in large part, but now, of course, as we can see, there was a huge mandate of the people. We have a new administration. We even have an executive order now protecting us against this very thing, thankfully. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: So we are turning the tide, But thanks to reporting like this, the context is global. There was in that PowerPoint, it was stated clearly there were 20 plus bilateral engagements with countries, including the Five Eyes network. It was also g seven in order to implement a global plan to shut down free speech and do exactly what we're observing the UK government to be doing right now. Speaker 0: Yes. It's really interesting, and I think a a lot of people are starting to realize just how much the UK government had to do with all of this. The the report that you're talking about being a crucial part during COVID, just how deeply involved they were with the censorship. You just look at, they them deploying members of their own government to come to The US during election season to lobby for Kamala Harris. I still think that's foreign interference. I I don't understand how that was allowed to occur. But, you know, it's it's one thing to show support. It's another thing to go and actively lobby. I mean, anyway, I just wanna know from you about this hack that you experienced right after. So so you tweet this information. It gets shared by Elon Musk. I think it had 18,000,000 views or or if I'm not mistaken. And then you get hacked almost immediately after. Speaker 1: It was crazy. That morning, I just happened to be looking at my phone twenty three seconds after he reposted the story that we're discussing. And within a matter of a few minutes, I had on my account these strange crypto posts. You know, it was promoting some kind of, like, scam coin. And I I quickly went in, changed my settings, was able to get the password to change, and somehow recovered my account. But just few minutes before that, I had just finished the, process of getting my own advanced data protection services activated through my phone because I didn't even know it existed either until the story came up. It turns out my partner is a UK citizen, And when she confirmed that she was the, you know, the backup to my account, somehow my account got hacked right at that moment. So I think it had to do with that, and it's very strange, right, that it had to do with my private key being transmitted basically to a UK citizen, and suddenly my account was hacked. It hasn't happened in fifteen years. Speaker 0: Wow. Speaker 1: I've been on Twitter for fifteen years. Speaker 0: That is that is absolutely fascinating. And it's interesting because, you know, you say it's a whole bunch of crypto scammers we know full well. I mean okay. We theorize full well that intelligence agencies, and governments are utilizing bots and scammer accounts to actually target dissidents. This is one of their ways. You know, you post something controversial, and immediately you have bots in your replies or liking your stuff to suppress your content. This is a this is a known tactic. In in my opinion, we don't have hard evidence for it, but it's a clear pattern that a lot of users have reported. So I wonder whether it was the fact that you were drawing attention to this that maybe, some shady characters were involved in that. Very, very interesting. Well, Sayar, as you mentioned, the tide is really turning, and more and more people are growing aware of this. What should people be doing now? Speaker 1: Well, we have legislation in this country that's modeled after The UK online safety bill and the EU Digital Services Act, which basically strips from us the privacy protections and rights that we have that are conferred to us by our beautiful constitution. So, unfortunately, Linda and Elon have actually endorsed the latest kids online safety bill even though the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which Elon is suing, right, and who's you know, tried to make it their purpose to destroy myself and other Americans for speaking up. They actually don't seem to realize that they are part of the agenda, which was revealed in the black ops memo, kill Elon's Twitter being the top line item for the year, and Speaker 2: then Speaker 1: trigger legislative regulation right underneath. This is actually part of that agenda, and there's about eight bills sponsored right now which would strip our basic rights under the ages of where you need to protect protect children, right, from from online harm. That is the way in which they have tried to legislate, lobby, affect PR, which is, again, CCDH is an unregistered foreign agent at the very least for the fact that that is their intention. They've made it very clear, and they're being allowed to run rogue. Last thing I'll say on that is that Imran Ahmed is supposed to receive an award by the Elevate Foundation Prize in Miami, May Twelfth To The Fourteenth. Three Hundred Thousand Dollars unrestricted and this prestigious prize for doing what? It's just amazing that they're basically getting replatformed in this country when they're subject to all of these congressional inquiries, lawsuits, DOJ complaints. This this is absurd. I really hope that people can sign the petition I put together, which is to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has completely attempted to annihilate our freedoms here in this country. Speaker 0: Where do people find that petition? Speaker 1: That's actually on change.org, and I I can give you a link to it. And it's, you know, just absurd that this would be allowed to happen, and that organization would would confer this kind of prestige and just shower him with cash for essentially targeting our our own political candidates and interfering with our elections. I mean, it's really ridiculous. Speaker 0: Yes, please. If you send that link, we'll make sure to share it around as well when we post this so that people can actually get involved. We we've gotta stay on top of this, say, what just happened in The UK is absolutely egregious. But, really, there are a lot of bad actors everywhere in the world that are trying to do the same thing to every country. Essentially, they wanna erase privacy, make everything the government basically invade every area of your lives, big tech invade every area of your lives, and we can't allow that to happen. Thank you so much. Saya, please let people know where they can follow you. Speaker 1: Thanks so much. Yeah. Basically, I still do most of my reporting GreenMedInfo.com. And, of course, on X, you can find me, Sayer G. I love to post these sorts of updates in real time. Speaker 0: Fantastic. Well, that is the X account at Sayer G, and the links for his websites are on there. Saya, thank you so much for your time. We really appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks so much, and I I really appreciate the work you're doing to, re replatform the Fifth Estate so that we can continue to have actual free speech in this country and the world. So thank you for that. Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Talk soon. Thanks. Well, we are very grateful for people like Sayagyi who are committed to bringing the truth and building a better future for humanity. And speaking of building a better future, our food supply is absolutely crucial to achieving that goal. Did you know that over 85% of the grass fed beef in stores is imported? That's because the country of origin labeling law was repealed in 2015. So now meat can be packaged here in The US and earn a product of USA label even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. And the truth is much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things you don't want, from antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But at Good Ranchers, transparency isn't just a buzzword. It is a promise. All products at Good Ranchers have trustworthy ingredients. Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in The USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It's free from hidden additives. There are no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient that you can read, and that's meat. Jermaine Gill, the chief growth officer of Good Ranches, explains what you need to know about the current state of the meat market. He joins us now. Jermaine, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you, Maria. Anytime we get a chance to, you know, talk about Good Ranchers and talk about agriculture, here at Good Ranchers, we always always wanna take that opportunity. So thank you, and thank you for being an advocate for, the local farms and ranches here in The US. I know it's important to you. It's important subject to us, so thank you. Speaker 0: It's absolutely important to me. This is preserving our food supply and the integrity of our food supply is paramount, And I don't think people really realize that until the food supply actually is at risk. And it is at risk all over the world. There is an attack specifically on farmers. There's an attack on meat, on protein. And so we wanna talk about, the integrity as well of the meat that people are getting when they go to good ranches. This is this is so important. So talk to us about the fact that when people go to the supermarket, they don't actually know for sure that their meat is coming from America. Speaker 2: Yeah. In 2015, the US government passed a country of origin labeling law that says that it's called the coal law. So it says that beef and pork in The US doesn't have to actually be born and raised, harvested here to be called product of The USA. So you can see that a stamp on some ground beef, and it'll have the American flag, and it says product USA. All it has to do is be further processed here in the country. So that means that it can be born, raised, harvested in another country, you know, Mexico, Uruguay, Latin America, South America. Those are the big places that we see a lot. Canada too. We see a lot of beef imported in from those other countries. And then it's either, you know, processed, meaning, like, cutting the steaks or ground up here in The US, and it now becomes called the product of The USA. Yeah. So, I mean, it's kinda it's very misleading. Right? Because, honest you know, The US is the best grower of beef chicken pork in the world. Right? We do the best job. We set all of the standards for animal husbandry, animal right, how we treat the animal, all of these things. You know, The US Agriculture is when it sets the standard for those things. And and so we pride ourselves on being the best growers. And it's kinda sad to see that because of this law, there's you know, almost 3,000,000,000 pounds of of beef have been imported into The US Wow. Over the or, like, last 2024. And so the regular American consumer doesn't even know. Right? They they trust that little American flag, that product USA labeling. And then in a bind, they don't realize, you know, that they can't tell where the meat has come from. That's why I had good ranch go ahead. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Speaker 0: Well, no. I I just wanted to say this is so, so important. People need to realize how how vital this is because we recently have an example out of The UK domain where there was a huge backlash over Beauvais ten. Now for people that aren't aware of that, this is can be a very, very dangerous additive, and the studies initial studies show that it can cause things like infertility and maybe even cancer. And so there was a backlash in The UK over this being inside dairy products. And so what they started to do was hide the the manufacturer, so from other products so that people wouldn't be aware that they were purchasing something that had beauveur in it, and you guarantee there's no beauveur in the meat. Right? Speaker 2: Yeah. No Beauvaeh. Yeah. We we've worked really hard, and and so our our our founder has been in Corley Spell. When they started the company, they started out of the need and desire to know where their where their meat was coming from. Right? They had started a family, and they started to do some more research and digging into, like, what the meat industry looked like in The US. And so out of the desire for a clean product, vaccine free products, products that they know that they could trust and that they could feed their family, that's where Good Ranchers came from. And so the heart and soul of who we are is it's two parts. Right? It's it's one, we want we always wanna support the American farm and rancher. I mean, I I I know I don't know if you know this, but, you know, ranches and farms, the small local are closing left and right because of imported beef and this, you know, big farm, big beef industry, big meat industry. So, one, we wanna support those guys. That's part of our mission. It's part of our heart. We wanna, you know, bring advocacy to them. We wanna tell their stories. We wanna be able to support them. Right? And so we've done that over the last seven years of of being in business. We've really done that. The other piece to the heart and soul of who we are is this the idea of a clean product, product that you can trust. And, you know, a hundred years ago that's when I was just telling this story to somebody earlier today. About a hundred years ago, if you were, you know, here in The US, you wanted to get, you know, chicken or beef, you would just, you know, go down the street to your local rancher and farm. You would meet the rancher and farm. Right? You would set up some you'd buy directly from them or from, like, a small butcher shop that had that connection. Well, as cities have grown, we've lost that connection. Right? We're we're no longer connected to our our food supply. Right? We we don't know where it's coming from. We don't know what is and a lot of us don't have time to really go and do the research. That's why, you know, trusting a company like Good Ranchers, we go out there. We do the research for you. We make sure it's a clean product. We make sure it's a product that we would feed ourselves. Been in correlating myself. We do the same thing. There we would never sell anything that we wouldn't feed to our own family. And so, you know, you don't have the time to go find those ranchers and those farmers, and let us go do the sourcing for you. That that's sort of that's that is who we are. Right? So let us do the sourcing. Let's make sure that the product's clean, the cleanest it can be, so that you can know and have trust that what you're feeding your family is it's it's supporting local farms and ranches in The US, and it's a clean product. Speaker 0: Well, this is what what you do at Good Ranchers is so important, Jermaine, because we have to keep those local farmers and those local ranches alive. Like I said, there is a sort of coordinated global attack on them. And whilst that may be different under the new administration, we have to keep their business going. We have to you know, we hope to see changes, and we hope to see farmers supported, but we have to keep that momentum going because you just look at how, over the years, not supporting local farms and, you know, just buying from supermarkets where you can't be certain of where your meat is from, and it's all sort of, you know, big business, big ag rather than the the grassroots people that actually care about the quality of the meat. Over the years, that's allowed many of them to be attacked, to be overregulated, you know, with you know, if you don't upgrade to this smart ag, which costs millions of dollars, you're gonna be shut down. We really have to put in effort to advocate for these businesses because this is our food. This is our strength. This is what keeps our families healthy. And let me just say, Jermaine, I'm gonna tell you, you know, I'm from Australia originally. I'm in I'm in America now, but when I was there, we we have incredible meat in Australia, and I I partnered as well with a company that does similar things to what Good Ranches does in Australia, and their meat was fantastic. And I came to The US, and I just couldn't find tasty meat anywhere. And then I tried Good Ranches, and it is good. It is very, very delicious. I will tell you that openly. And so I I think it's it's a fantastic option for people. What what are some other really important points for you? Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, for us, you know you know, tariffs is a big thing that everybody are talking about right now. Right? And so, you know, one of the things that we we drew a line in the sand very early on in the company was that not only was our meat gonna be born, raised, and harvested in The US, but our whole supply chain was gonna be a % US based. So that's why when you're gonna see rising cost of meat products in the grocery store, the butcher shop, other online meat companies that are importing products in from overseas, you're not gonna see that same rising cost with us because we've we've already secured our whole supply chain to be a % American. So, you know, as you start to get that, like, pricing sensitivity, right, people are gonna start and and and we're we see it now. Right? We talk about it. It's all over the news. Right? Price of eggs are increasing. Price of ground beef is increasing. Everything. You're gonna see it we see it all over the place now. You know, when you buy from good ranchers, you can be secure that your price is gonna be it's gonna stay the same for why you're with us as well as you know, we're always we always wanna give back. We always wanna give value back to our customers. So, like, one of the things that we're running right now is, like, free meat for a year. Right? So, you know, free you get to choose ground beef, chicken, salmon, whatever, you know, whatever product you want. And we're gonna give you a portion of that for free for a year. So, you know, not like I said, we're we're trying to give back to not just local farms and ranches, but to the American family. Right? Or, you know, part of our goal is to bring people to the table. And so we know that, you know, there is some fear or, you know, hesitancy there with pricing and concern that the price of beef and price of meat is gonna continue to rise. You know, with good ranchers, we're here to help. Right? And so we've kind of got ahead of the whole tariff thing. Right? And there's this, you know, movement to bring American meat, right, to buy American. And so, that's what we've been doing since we started. Right? And so we're we're happy to be a part of the solution, right, and a part of the answer. Speaker 0: Well, I'm really grateful for that. I I applaud your mission. I really do. We have to support local farms, local branches. This is one of the most important things that we have to do because our food supply is at the core of our health. Like, it's it's that simple. Yeah. And so and I really I Speaker 2: will say I will say one. Speaker 0: Go on. Speaker 2: Yeah. I'll say one thing. You know, you don't have to sacrifice quality and taste for clean and and, you know, chopping your values. Right? Like, our prod like you said it earlier, I I I mean, I've we've had beef from all over now. The best. You know? And I will hands down put Good Ranchers a Good Ranchers product up against any other thing. You know, we we not only are we, like, trying to source the cleanest thing, but we age all of our beef, you know, a minimum of 28. Our chicken is all small, but we have a internal saying, and it's kinda funny. People will come for the steak, but they stay for the chicken because our chicken is just so phenomenal. Speaker 0: Is good. Speaker 2: You think, like, all chicken is right. It's all made the same, but our chicken just you you can taste the difference. It's it's more tender. It's got a little bit of a different flavor profile to it. It's a smaller it's not those gigantic pterodactyl sized chicken breasts you're gonna see at the grocery store. It's pumped full of hormones. It's a smaller chicken breast. So, like, you know, it it's phenomenal. I I I would just say our our product, you don't have to sacrifice quality or taste. Speaker 0: Well, what I really Speaker 2: and and and do right. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And what I really love as well is that it comes in portions. So when you're buying meat from the supermarket, you might get a whole bunch of unwanted parts that you're paying for but throwing out where Good Ranchers gets all those portions for you. You're actually getting what you pay for, And then it's easier for meal prep as well. So there's just so many benefits, Jermaine. I I, again, love the meat. I'm I'm going to be regularly buying it. I recently tried it. I love it. It's great. You can taste the the quality of the meat. And just knowing as well that we're supporting local local farmers and ranchers is number one. This needs to become, you know, really the the motto of America going forward. The motto of every country, really. You have to support your farmers and your ranchers. You have to. It's it's it's paramount to our existence. And so and and the added benefit of the value add that you're giving to your customers as well because you're not just giving back to the businesses, but also to your customers is just wonderful. So thank you so much for your time today, Jermaine. I really appreciate it. This is how you can be sure of the safety and the quality of your meat by purchasing from Good Ranchers Direct. Thank you so much, Jermaine. Speaker 2: Thank you. Thanks for having us. And, again, like I said, Maria, thank you for your support. Thank you for, highlighting the needs of us ranchers, farmers out there. And, you know, you we cannot stress this enough. Like, securing a great of your food supply, understanding where your meat come from, and finding a trusted provider is so important. It's it you know, we it's like we're feeding our future, really, honestly. Right? Because, you know, what we put in our bodies is important. So thank you for trusting Good Ranchers. Appreciate it. Thanks so much. Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Thank you. Speaker 2: Thanks. You have a great day. Speaker 0: Huge thanks to Jermaine Gill and Good Ranchers for sponsoring the show and offering a truly clean, transparent meat service that supports our values and the good of humanity. And speaking of clean food, I have exciting news. Good Ranch's seed oil free chicken nuggets are back. Made with whole cuts of chicken, they're gluten free, allergen safe, and packed with delicious clean flavor. You can subscribe to a box or add them to any order at GoodRanches.com/VNN. But here's the best part. Good Ranches delivers straight to your door, skipping the grocery store and offering farm to table transparency. Right now, when you subscribe to any box at Good Ranches, you'll get free ground beef, chicken breasts, or wild caught salmon for a full year plus $25 off when you use the code VNN at checkout. Don't miss out on the pleasure of eating top quality meat. Go to GoodRanchers.com/VNN and use code VNN to get free meat for a year and $25 off your order. We love their services, and we think you will too.
Sign the Petition I am one of the many who have experienced defamation, deplatforming, and lawfare at the hands of Imran Ahmed and his organization, CCDH. They have targeted me and twelve others they labeled the "disinformation dozen" for merely expressing narratives different from theirs, challenging our very right to free speech, fairness, and open debate. The Elevate Prize Foundation's decision to award Imran Ah change.org
Saved - March 16, 2025 at 1:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my speech in Parliament, I shared my experience with the mRNA vaccine, explaining how it prompts the immune system to recognize and respond to spike proteins. After a few days, the mRNA is gone, but the immune system retains a memory of how to combat COVID-19. I find this process fascinating and reassuring, as it means there's nothing to fear—only the knowledge of how to fight the virus if it appears. I confirmed this explanation with doctors, who agreed it accurately describes what happens.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Act Party leader @dbseymour, speaking in Parliament in September 2021: "When that mRNA enters the cells of a human—as it entered mine last Friday—the immune system of the human says, 'Hello, hello, we’ve got something here like this; I’m going to generate a response to destroy it,' and the immune system learns to destroy those spike proteins. Now, within a few days, all of the mRNA that came in the vaccine is gone. The spike proteins that your cells produced upon receiving the mRNA have been destroyed by your immune system. The only thing that remains is a memory in one’s immune system of what it’s like to fight something that looks like COVID-19. And if COVID-19 spike proteins do appear in your body, your immune system is ready to fight them. And I actually think that’s pretty cool, but it also shows that you have absolutely nothing to fear, because all you’re left with is the memory of how to fight it. I just asked the good doctors on the other side of the house if that’s roughly what happens, and they said, 'Yes, that’s actually a pretty good description.'" At 3:07 👇

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

The Covid Vax Spike Protein ⎹ How it Started & How it's Going HOW IT STARTED: "The spike protein breaks down quickly and doesn’t stay in our body" HOW IT'S GOING: Spike protein found in the body for up to 709 days post-vaccination, possibly mutating humans to produce spike indefinitely, and pass this trait on to future generations. Please retweet. @TanyaUnkovichMP @SimeonBrownMP @dbseymour

Video Transcript AI Summary
The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine delivers instructions for creating spike proteins, which then triggers an immune response. The vaccine and spike protein are said to break down and disappear within days, leaving no trace and not affecting DNA. The vaccine is taken up at the injection site and quickly metabolized. However, an Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration document indicates the vaccine distributes throughout the body, including adipose tissue, adrenal glands, and the brain. There was allegedly no data on how quickly the mRNA degrades. Research indicates vaccine mRNA can be detected up to 14-15 days post-vaccination in some individuals. A rare post-vaccination syndrome (PVS) is associated with chronic conditions and elevated spike protein levels up to 709 days post-vaccination, even without detectable SARS-CoV-2 infection. One hypothesis suggests that the mRNA may reverse transcribe and integrate into DNA, causing continuous spike protein production and potentially leading to T cell exhaustion. The possibility of germline transfer and long-term health consequences is raised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine is completely gone from your body within days, leaving your immune system stronger and ready for action if COVID nineteen comes near you. Speaker 1: When the mRNA COVID nineteen vaccine enters your body, it provides a set of coded instructions to create copies of what are called spike proteins. As soon as the spike protein has been made, the vaccine breaks down and it disappears. Speaker 2: The genetic code is like a recipe the body can use to make a version of the virus' spike protein. Once our cells make this protein, our immune system responds to it, learning how to fight the virus without us actually getting sick. The spike protein breaks down quickly and doesn't stay in our body. Speaker 3: As soon as your cells are done with the vaccine, they destroy it. It does not stick around in your body. Speaker 4: When the vaccine is administered into the muscle in your arm, it's fairly quickly metabolized, and and leaves your body. Speaker 5: The vaccine's taken up at the injection site. It doesn't actually diffuse throughout the body. Speaker 6: As soon as they've done their job and that antibody response has been generated, that fragment is excreted from the cell, and there's no way at all it can affect the body's normal DNA. Speaker 5: And then once these things are taken up, they are they are they disintegrate. They recycle, for example. So after over a period of days, hours to days, actually, that what was injected really ceases to exist. Speaker 7: Yeah. Speaker 8: And as Helen was explaining, it's a single dose that's put in your arm, and then quickly your body clears it away. Speaker 9: You know, when Helen was talking just before, went, okay, that's cool. So they inject the stuff, they inject the RNA into your arm, they kind of wrap it up in a little thing to protect it, and basically, within hours to days, that thing is gone because it's like they just put something in your arm temporarily that makes your immune system go, hang on. Something going on over there, and then it starts making stuff to help us. So that like, I hadn't ever heard of it explained like that, and now I I now I kinda get it. Like, okay. They put a thing in. It's wrapped in a thing. Your immune system Speaker 10: is full. Water. There's a lot of a lot of it is actually water, isn't it, Helen? Yeah. Going in there. And Speaker 9: it and it makes stuff, and and then it and then it disappears. Speaker 4: What happens is the vaccine itself, and this is the case with the Pfizer vaccine, the vaccine goes in, and then it's completely degraded in the body within a few days. It is not there anymore. You cannot find any trace of it anymore because your body has dealt with it and degraded it. Speaker 0: Nothing is left behind from the vaccine. Our body breaks down the mRNA, and there Speaker 10: is no possibility of the vaccine affecting our body's DNA. Speaker 0: Find out more at covid19.g0vt.nz/vaccines. Speaker 3: When that mRNA enters the cells of a human as it entered mine last Friday, the immune system of the human says, hello, hello, we've got something here like this. I'm going to generate a response to destroy it. The immune system learns to destroy those spike proteins. Now within a few days, all of the mRNA that came in the vaccine is gone. The spike proteins that your cells produced upon receiving the mRNA have been destroyed by your immune system. The only thing that remains is a memory in one's immune system of what it's like to fight something that looks like COVID nineteen. And if COVID nineteen spike proteins do appear in your body, your immune system's ready to fight it. I actually think that's pretty cool. But it also shows that you have absolutely nothing to fear because all you're left with is the memory of how to fight it. I just ask the good doctors on the other side of the house if that's roughly what happens. And they say, yes, that's actually a pretty good description. Speaker 7: Now we want to discuss this document here. This is from the TGA, the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia, which authorizes therapeutics. And I think it's clear to emphasize that the, the Therapeutics Goods Administration in Australia had all this information prior to authorizing the vaccines, the the COVID vaccines. This was known about. And we we do know that that the the the data shows here, I've got this page here, that the the systemic distribution is is quite stunning. We were initially told that this just stays in the deltoid muscle. But but but here here we see that the vaccine's actually been found in adipose tissue, adrenal glands, bladder, bone, bone marrow, brain, eyes, heart, injection site, kidneys, large intestine, liver, lungs, basically all over the body. So they knew about this systemic distribution that that was there and and that was known about. And and the the the other thing we were told that the the vaccine would only the mRNA would only stay there for a short period of time, but then we read from page four that there was actually no degradation data. Speaker 11: That's exactly right. Speaker 7: We're told we're not told how quickly it would it would go away. Really quite incredible. Speaker 11: Yeah. So so two big issues there. So some of the pushback I've had from the TGA in regards to that distribution is they're saying it's it's at levels that's not toxic to the body, in the other cells, in the other body organs. Now that may be true after two days. But the question is why did they stop it after two days when the level of concentration in those organs was still increasing? I would have thought you would run the trial long enough so that the actual lipids and the mRNA and the spike protein was actually had left the body. Speaker 7: We were told that the the mRNA will break down in a short period of time, but here it's saying that that simply was not studied. So at the time this vaccine was approved, people simply didn't know how long it would last for. Speaker 12: So, again, how long does this stay in the body? So we started to see some research, and here's one of the pieces of research early on. Blood distribution of SARS CoV to lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines in humans. So it looks at looks at what how long this lipid nanoparticle and mRNA is in the blood. And it says both the vaccine mRNA and the I ionizable lipid peaked in the blood one to two days post vaccination. The vaccine mRNA was detectable and quantifiable up to fourteen to fifteen days post vaccination, thirty seven percent of subjects. So, I mean, you're looking at clearly less than a month that they're saying this lipid nanoparticle mRNA, they're clearly found together. Without that lipid nanoparticle, the mRNA is not gonna survive. So where you find one, typically find the other. And it only stays in the body. We found it thirty seven percent of people for about fourteen to fifteen days, and then the rest of it's over with. Well, now we now we get into the new research. And so we have what's called a rare syndrome. This is what is the title of this headline. Researchers describe rare syndrome after COVID vaccine. What kind of rare sin syndrome? Well, we go to Yale researchers, and we'll go to the study that they're actually quoting here. It says immunological and antigenic signatures associated with chronic illnesses after COVID nineteen vaccination. So that's interesting because chronic illnesses, long COVID chronic illness Right. At some point, we're now we're seeing the official merge of this. It's maybe the same thing. Some caused by maybe the the the illness, some caused by the vaccine, but very similar on the outcome on the back end. So we go into this study and it says a small fraction of the population reports a chronic debilitating condition after COVID nineteen vaccination often referred to as post vaccination syndrome, PVS. Serological evidence of recent Epstein Barr virus reactivation was observed more frequently in the post vaccination syndrome participants. So they're having a reactivation of these dormant illnesses. Further, individuals with PVS exhibited elevated levels of circulating spike protein compared to healthy controls. That's a huge clue. Most notably, we found elevated levels of spike, s one and full length spike, not just the fragments, the full length, in circulation up to seven hundred and nine days after vaccination among a subset with post vaccination syndrome even though even in those with no evidence of detectable SARS CoV two infection. Wow. This is bombshell. Speaker 5: After, over a period of days, hours to days actually, that what was injected really ceases to exist. Speaker 7: Yeah. Speaker 13: So, yeah, now we're talking two years. At first, it was a month, and we kept saying, as we've been reporting on this, it looks like the spike protein is long lasting as long as the study that looks at it. Right? It was first Yeah. Three months. Then we looked at a six month study, still here. A year one year study, still here. Now seven hundred and nine days in, I guess, still there, still producing spike protein. So this virus manufacturing plant or more specifically, a spike protein manufacturing plant, at least in those people that are fight finding, like, illness. This long COVID, you know, scenario that we're listening to, is just does anyone know how to shut it off? I mean, it's terrifying, really. Speaker 9: Right. Speaker 13: And and until and you so brilliantly started out with these scientists going, well, we don't really know. We know we're getting an immune response or we we think it's just a couple of days. Well, what if it's not a couple days? And what happens now that you've done no long term safety trials and so everybody got this thing? As it turns out, it's like years your body is making this really horrifying. Speaker 4: The vaccine goes in and then it's completely degraded in the body within a few days. It is not there anymore. Speaker 12: Remember, the messenger RNA can't live in the body just free floating, so it has to be in that lipid nanoparticle. And once that lipid nanoparticle gets into the cell, it delivers a message, and that's it. The spike protein is produced, and its job's done. So all of that is is over. So what's producing these? Because the spike protein is not gonna be floating around in the body just just hanging out because the immune system will find that. So why is there spike protein full length? What's going on here? And so we saw studies early on in 2020, '20 '20 '1 that's showing this. These are tabletop exercises, but this is 2021. Reverse transcribed SARS CoV two RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in a patient derived tissues. So is this what's happening? Has this integrated into the DNA where we no longer need the vaccine now? Literally, DNA is telling our body to continually express and produce these proteins. I mean, there's a lot of evidence early on that that might have been the case. And, you know, in this in this Yale study where that pro spike protein was hanging out for seven hundred nine days, they noticed that people that had that reactivated virus post vaccination syndrome had lower t cells. These are the signaling cells of your immune system. Well, there's also evidence of this. This is a study titled T cell exhaustion during persistent viral infections. So this is obviously a hypothesis, but is this spike proteins just being produced forevermore and the the immune system is just trying to grab it and grab it and grab it, and you're now getting tired because it it can't stop fighting it because it's just continually coming. Speaker 13: I mean, what you're saying there, and I wanna put out that this is just a hypothesis right now. What we're talking about is something that a lot of scientists are looking at. This is very troubling. But this hypothesis is that that what you're saying is that this beautiful little shell, this fatty lipid that protected the mRNA so it could get to the cell, we know that gets dissolved once it's entered the cells. So anything else out in the body should be being killed by the immune system and not continuing to recreate or or go to other cells because it can't get there without being attacked by the immune system unless somehow some of this mRNA reverse transcript say that word again? Reverse transcriptase. It's Reverse transcriptase writes itself into your DNA. Now, basically, the bible code of your body is telling cells, teaching cells, creating cells that make spike protein as a part of their existence. Is it possible that we have mutated the human beings that are experiencing this so that their bodies will create spike protein the rest of their existence? And then the big question is, what happens if they have kids? Are they gonna pass that on germline transfer? Are you gonna see their kids? Did we just create an entire species that now just pumps out spike protein all day, every day, the rest of their lives for centuries to come? Speaker 0: The vaccine is completely gone from your body within days. Speaker 13: And what's gonna be the health of those people? Again, a, you know, hypothesis, but a terrifying one in a space where we don't have an explanation otherwise why you're seeing this last so long in in so many people. I mean, this is what happens when you and all I can say is this is what happens when you mess with nature. When you rush a product onto the market and giggle about how little you know about it and then tell everyone to get it. I hope to get to the bottom of this and someone's gonna have to figure out how do you pry if it's possible. How do you pry something back out of your DNA if it's made a mistake? If we even inserted a mistake into your DNA. Speaker 6: There's no way at all it can affect the body's normal DNA.
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how the pandemic was manipulated for power, detailing staged events, misleading statistics, and psychological tactics used to instill fear. I discussed the false narratives around asymptomatic spread, the inflation of COVID death counts, and the suppression of effective treatments to promote vaccines. The media played a crucial role in perpetuating panic, while dissent was silenced. Ultimately, I argued that the pandemic served as a pretext for a broader agenda, reshaping society under elite control, rather than focusing on public health.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1. Staged Wuhan Panic: China kicked off the scare with choreographed "collapse in the street" videos. People dramatically keeling over in Wuhan, something never seen elsewhere. Even WHO called these collapses "atypical." It was pure psy-op theater to ignite global fear. https://t.co/v7vaoBXXM4

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2. Bogus PCR cases: A phony testing regime built the “casedemic.” The German cirologist @c_drosten introduced a PCR test that can’t diagnose infection – cranked to excessive cycle thresholds so it flagged mostly false positives. Millions of healthy people were branded “dangerous COVID cases,” juicing the numbers to justify lockdowns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3. “Asymptomatic spread” myth: They pushed the lie that healthy people could silently infect others, to justify testing and restricting those with no symptoms. But there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. This was propaganda to lock down the healthy and mask toddlers. What many people don’t know is that the person who came up with the lie of asymptomatic transmission is the same one who created the COVID PCR protocol: the German virologist Christian Drosten.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4. Coordinated Narrative Shift on COVID: On Feb 1, 2020, Fauci, Drosten, Andersen & others had a secret call. They admitted COVID might be lab-made. Within days, they flipped, pushed the natural origin lie, and Andersen got millions in grants. Science was replaced with narrative. https://t.co/r4fqdyx9Ip

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5. Weaponized psychology: Governments literally hired behavioral psychologists to crank up the fear. In the UK, the SPI-B team admit they used “unethical” fear tactics – one scientist called it “totalitarian… not ethical”​ – to increase compliance. Leaked documents show officials discussing how to frighten the public into obedience. This was a deliberate fear pandemic, not a viral one.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6. Needed fake mortality: The sniffles were never going to kill enough people to sustain panic. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. So they cooked the books to create the appearance of mass death (see next points). COVID’s true infection fatality rate (~0.2% globally) is akin to a bad flu – so they had to inflate the body count by any means.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7. Manufactured hysteria illness: Since “mild cold symptoms” wouldn’t deliver the death spike they needed, authorities terrorized everyone to trigger mass psychogenic illness – essentially people getting sick from fear​ via chronically elevated cortisol levels. These elevated levels suppress immunity; anxiety and lockdown harms caused spikes in deaths (heart attacks, overdoses) that they then counted as “COVID.” It was a self-fulfilling pandemic of fear.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8. 24/7 media terror: They blasted fear propaganda non-stop. News tickers ran running death tolls, every hospital incident became front-page news, and worst-case models dominated headlines. Governments fed the panic with lurid warnings (Boris Johnson claiming “bodies piled high” if restrictions lifted). By design, the public was kept in a state of constant fear. Objective risk (median COVID age ~80) was ignored to create the impression anyone could drop dead tomorrow.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9. Flu cases relabeled as COVID: Flu virtually disappeared. Instead of celebrating the end of flu, officials pretended it was due to COVID measures – an absurd lie while COVID supposedly ran rampant. They simply rebranded the flu (and other respiratory illnesses) as “COVID” to inflate the pandemic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10. Every death counted as COVID: If you died in a car crash but tested positive, it was marked as a COVID death. Guidelines said even if the cause was clearly unrelated, it still counted. Hospitals were told to list deaths as COVID if the patient had ever tested positive or was merely suspected. Even those who died within two weeks of a positive test were included. This wildly inflated the stats by labeling non-COVID deaths as COVID.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11. Financial incentives to inflate deaths: Hospitals had a perverse monetary motive to jack up COVID diagnoses. In the US, thanks to emergency payouts, a COVID patient on a ventilator could bring in ~$40,000 – roughly triple the normal reimbursement. Medicare’s 20% bonus for COVID cases and ventilator bonuses meant big $$$ for hospitals that labeled patients as COVID and put them on vents. This incentivized over-treatment and even negligence (e.g. unnecessary venting with ~90% fatality once intubated). It literally paid to have more COVID deaths.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12. Early treatments banned: They aggressively suppressed effective therapies to protect the vaccine rollout. Doctors using ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or vitamin D were vilified. The Lancet published a fake HCQ study (later retracted) that halted global trials. Meanwhile, they pushed toxic and expensive remdesivir. Even monoclonal antibodies and IV vitamin C were restricted. Denying real treatment let patients worsen, driving deaths and fear, all to pave the way for their “miracle” vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13. Fake hospital footage & crisis actors: Media showed us scenes of overflowing hospitals – often misleading or outright fake. Example: CBS News was caught using video of a packed Italian ICU while reporting on NYC’s COVID situation​, implying New York hospitals were overrun. They called it an “editing mistake.” Similar stunts happened worldwide (recycling old disaster photos, staging scenes). Meanwhile, many hospitals were actually so empty (elective care canceled) that nurses had time for TikTok dance videos. The “overwhelmed hospitals” narrative was largely a scripted show to panic the public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14. Draconian lockdowns with no benefit: They imposed China-style society-wide lockdowns – a blunt instrument never recommended in prior pandemic plans. Small businesses, schools, churches all shuttered by government decree. The result was a devastating economic and social harm, with no proven mortality benefit.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15. “Vaccines are the only way out”: After stoking panic and crushing cures, they presented the magic solution – rushed mRNA vaccines. Self-proclaimed health experts like Bill Gates promised these experimental shots were 95% effective and safe, that vaccination would end the pandemic. Governments shoveled billions to Pharma and granted them blanket immunity from liability for any harms. They then coerced the public via mandates and “passport” systems. It was a massive human experiment, using fear to sell acceptance of a novel vaccine platform and to cement a new level of state and corporate control over individual bodies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16. Lies about vaccine efficacy: They did not hesitate to lie. The CDC Director herself falsely claimed “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”​ and won’t get sick. President Biden said “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” These statements were patently false – breakthrough infections happened by the millions, and studies showed vaccinated individuals can spread COVID​. They knowingly oversold the vaccines to bully people into compliance, then kept changing the story (“you need a booster…actually 3 boosters…”). Fun fact: If you died within two weeks of a positive PCR test, you were counted as a COVID death — no questions asked. But if you died within two weeks of the vaccine? “Doesn’t count, it hadn’t kicked in yet.” One rule to inflate fear, another to protect the narrative.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17. Goalposts forever shifting: Nothing was ever temporary. “15 days to slow the spread” turned into 15 months of restrictions​. They said masks were unnecessary – then mandated two masks. They said lockdowns would be one-time – then reimposed them repeatedly. They promised “herd immunity” at 70% vaccinated – then moved the target. Each time the public met one demand, authorities doubled back and added more, betraying every assurance. This psychological abuse kept societies off-balance and prolongued the emergency powers indefinitely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18. Crushing and punishing dissent: Any expert or citizen who questioned the narrative was attacked. High-profile scientists who proposed focused protection (the Great Barrington Declaration) were subjected to a secret campaign by NIH officials calling for a “quick and devastating takedown” of them​. Doctors who saved patients with ivermectin or other protocols were stripped of licenses. Online skeptic communities were purged from Facebook , Twitter, and YouTube. Whistleblowers (nurses, data analysts) faced gag orders. The establishment used character assassination and censorship to maintain the illusion of unanimous “Science” support, quashing debate through intimidation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19. Data rigging to promote vaccines: When vaccines rolled out, they manipulated statistics to credit them. In May 2021 the CDC quietly stopped tracking COVID cases among vaccinated people unless hospitalized or dead​. Tens of thousands of breakthrough infections disappeared from the data. By counting every case in unvaccinated but ignoring most in vaccinated, they fabricated a narrative that “almost only the unvaccinated” were getting sick. This was a blatant data trick to prop up vaccine efficacy and fuel scapegoating of the unvaccinated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20. Ever-changing variants to extend fear: Just as the original wave waned, they hyped new “variants of concern” – Alpha, Delta, Omicron – to keep fear alive, and then blamed it on the unvaccinated. Each variant became the next reason for booster shots and continued restrictions. Media dutifully pumped scary stories (“Delta hitting young people”, “Omicron evades immunity”) with little context. It was a moving target to prevent the public from relaxing. By the time people caught on that each variant was milder than advertised, another one was on the horizon. The endless variants ensured the panic carousel kept spinning.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21. Excess mortality surged post-vaccination: After mass vaccination campaigns, excess deaths rose dramatically, and continue even now. Authorities blamed everything from heatwaves to gardening and “climate anxiety,” desperately avoiding the most obvious cause: the jab itself. https://t.co/E7pam6YzfC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22. Inventing "Long COVID": As vaccine injuries surged, authorities conveniently introduced "Long COVID", a vague, catch-all diagnosis. Its broad, ambiguous symptoms perfectly matched common post-vaccination side effects, masking the truth behind escalating injuries. https://t.co/Q7JvQbAOeO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23. Conveniently “ending” the pandemic: After three years of orchestrated chaos, they abruptly declared the crisis over – not because of any scientific breakthrough, but for political convenience. The WHO ended the global emergency in May 2023, even as excess mortality remained high. Suddenly, COVID coverage vanished. Leaders who imposed tyranny moved on to the next agenda (Ukraine, climate) without apology or accountability. The pandemic theater ended when its architects chose to shift focus — not when the virus faded. Now they want amnesty for terrorizing citizens for years.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24. Engineered for the Great Reset: In sum, the “pandemic” was a planned global power grab – a pretext for a new world order. Consider that in October 2019, globalists (WEF/Gates) ran Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic that crashes economies and prompts draconian measures​. Sound familiar? Just months later, COVID-19 hit and governments executed in lockstep the very playbook discussed. Klaus Schwab of the WEF openly called COVID-19 a “rare but narrow window” to impose the Great Reset of society. From lockdowns to digital IDs, the pandemic fulfilled a wish-list of authoritarian controls. This was never about public health – it was about exploiting a virus to restructure society under elite rule. The “fake pandemic” narrative has been proven by each of these hard facts, and history will remember it as one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. Thank you for reading this thread and please give it a share and me a follow if you found it informative. Much appreciated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a young generation, we are grateful to penetrate cabinets. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world by taking action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. People assume we are just going back to the good old world, but this is fiction. It will not happen. There is only one way this pandemic is going to go: it's going to get worse and worse and worse. The next crisis is already waiting for us, and it is the climate crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a young generation like prime minister Trudeau, half of this cabinet are actually young noble leaders of the world are grateful. We penetrate the cabinets. The change is not just happening. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world. How to prepare? Take the necessary action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. Speaker 1: There is only one way this pandemic is going to go. It's going to get worse and worse and worse. Speaker 0: The next crisis is already waiting for us around the coma, and it is the climate crisis.
Saved - May 14, 2025 at 12:41 AM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Breaking: study was finally published showing unprecedented harm from COVID vaccines. Full article: Detection of S1 spike protein in CD16+ monocytes up to 245 days in SARS-CoV-2-negative post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS) individuals https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2025.2494934

Saved - May 18, 2025 at 3:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reaching out to the community out of desperation as I face a coordinated attack on my account, forcing me to delete over 196 posts in five weeks. My mission has been to expose COVID tyranny and promote a pro-liberty message, which has garnered significant attention and followers. However, I’m being targeted for sharing alternative views, leading to repeated lockouts and threats to my account. This censorship is damaging my work and social media business. I urge action against this manipulation and invite support to continue my efforts.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dear 𝕏 Community, I write this post out of desperation. A coordinated group is making my life a living hell. I’ve been forced to DELETE over 196 of my own posts in just the past 5 weeks! This includes simple thread summaries of @joerogan’s podcast. I fear my safety and my account could be in danger. Please listen to my cry for help. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

For the past three and a half years, I’ve been in the fight—calling out COVID tyranny, helping Trump win, exposing medical lies, driving RFK Jr. across the HHS finish line, and backing MAHA efforts.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

My work has generated billions of impressions and amassed over 1.7 million followers on this platform.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But the mission has always been bigger than numbers: to push a pro-human, pro-liberty message—because the government has too much power, your tax dollars are being stolen, and no one’s coming to save us but ourselves.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before and during COVID, I worked in healthcare. I was always quiet—never voiced strong opinions. Then, I witnessed the worst assault on human liberties I had ever seen in my life.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The verbal abuse, the shaming, the blaming of the unvaccinated, coupled with the ruination of people’s livelihoods and denied surgeries, was too much to ignore. Here’s a video recap of what happened and what we had to endure.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Unvaccinated Americans are asked what they are waiting for, as vaccines are free, safe, and convenient. - There are two classes of people: vaccinated and unvaccinated. - Being anti-mandate equates to being anti-vaxx, regardless of vaccination status. - In Austria, unvaccinated individuals may face fines up to €2,000 each time they are caught, potentially multiple times a day, and imprisonment for up to a year if they refuse to pay. - The unvaccinated are the heroes, serving as a control group that highlighted the shortcomings of the COVID vaccines. - Health experts and political leaders aimed to make life unlivable for the unvaccinated. - Scapegoating the unvaccinated provided a release after months of lockdowns. - Leaders like Lamby, Carr, Chad, Andrews, McGowan, Gunnar, Fauci, and Biden should be held accountable for vilifying the unvaccinated. - Gratitude is owed to the unvaccinated for their perseverance, which exposed the wrongness of the mandates. - The war on the unvaccinated was lost, and we should be thankful for that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My message to unvaccinated Americans is this. What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see? We've made vaccinations free, safe, and convenient. The vaccine is FDA approval. Over two hundred million Americans have gotten at least one shot. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us. Get vaccinated. Speaker 1: So you basically see it. Speaker 2: This is gonna be like well, it's almost like you probably don't see it like this. There's two different classes of people. If you're vaccinated or if you're unvaccinated, you have all these rights. If you are vaccinated Speaker 3: That is what it is. So, yep. Yep. If you are anti mandate, you are absolutely anti vaxx. I don't care what your personal vaccination status is. If you support Champion, give a green light, give comfort to support anybody who argues against the vaccine, you are an anti vaxxer. Absolutely. Your personal vaccination status is utterly irrelevant. If you campaign against the mandate, if you campaign against people being vaccinated in vulnerable settings, teachers and classrooms, I'll be really clear. At that point in time, people were actually supporting the idea of a teacher being unvaccinated in a remote community classroom. The kids who can't be vaccinated. I reject that. I I still reject it. And if you are out there in any way, shape, or form campaigning against this man, that you are absolutely handbags. Speaker 2: Dear supporters and dear followers Today an Austrian newspaper published the rules the government wants to introduce on the January 1 already here in Austria. Those rules say that if you're not vaccinated you can get fined up to €2,000 each time you're caught unvaccinated this can mean and this is explicitly being said so that you can also get fined more than once a day or three times four times five times if you're unvaccinated if you refuse to pay this the government wants to put us into a separate prison which has to be created for unvaccinated people up to one year Speaker 1: If COVID was a battlefield, it would still be warm with the bodies of the unvaccinated. Thankfully, the mandates are letting up in both sides of the war stumble back to the new normal. The unvaccinated are the heroes of the last two years as they allowed us all to have a control group in the great experiment and highlight the shortcoming of the COVID vaccines. The unvaccinated carry many battle scars and injuries as they are the people we tried to mentally break. Yet no one wants to talk about what we did to them and what they forced the science to unveil. We knew that the waning immunity of the fully vaccinated had the same risk profile as others within society as the minority of the unvaccinated, yet we've marked them for special persecution. You see, we said that they had not done the right thing for the greater good by handing their bodies and medical autonomy over to the state. Many of the so called health experts and political leaders in Australia admitted the goal was to make life almost unlivable for the unvaccinated, which was multiplied many times by the collective mob with a fight taken into workplaces, friendships, and family gatherings. Today, the hard truth is none of it was justified as we took a quick slide from righteousness to absolute cruelty. We might lay the blame on our leaders and health experts for the push, but each individual within society must be held accountable for stepping into the well laid out trap. We did this despite knowing full well that principled opposition is priceless. When it comes to what goes inside our bodies, we let ourselves be tricked into believing that going into another ineffective lockdown would be the fault of the unvaccinated and not the fault of the toxic policy of ineffective vaccines. We took pleasure in scapegoating the unvaccinated because after months of engineered lockdowns by political leaders blinded by power, having someone to blame in turn to burn at the stake felt good. We believed we had logic, love, and truth on our side so it's easy to wish death upon the unvaccinated. Those of us who ridiculed and mocked the noncompliant did it because we were embarrassed by their courage and principles and didn't think the unvaccinated would make it through unbroken, and we turned the holdouts into punching bags. Lamby, Carr, Chad, Andrews, McGowan, Gunnar, and the other cast of hundreds in prominent roles. And we here in America, we could add Fauci and the rest of them and Biden in prominent roles need to be held to account for vilifying the unvaccinated in public and fueling angry social media mobs. The mobs, the masked Nazis, and the vaccine disciples have been embarrassed by betting against the unvaccinated because mandates only had the power we gave them. It was not compliance that ended domination by big pharma companies, Bill Gates, and his many organizations and the World Economic Forum. It was thanks to the people we tried to embarrass, ridicule, mock, and tear down. We should all try and find some inner gratitude for the unvaccinated as we took the bait by hating them because their perseverance and courage bought us the time to see we were wrong. So if mandates ever return for COVID or any other disease or virus, hopefully, more of us will be awake and see the rising authoritarianism that has no concern for our well-being and is more about power and control. The war of the unvaccinated was lost. On the unvaccinated was lost, and we should all be very thankful for that.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I had zero presence on social media, but I knew I had to act. I couldn’t sit back and watch COVID tyranny spiral out of control. So, I started a Twitter account, and “The Vigilant Fox” was born. http://vigilantfox.com/

The Vigilant Fox | Substack The stories that matter the media hopes you’ll never hear. Subscribe now to stay sharp and informed. Click to read The Vigilant Fox, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before Elon took over, my account had been banned three separate times on Twitter for the crime of sharing the other side of the COVID story. Standing with me were medical freedom heroes like @RWMaloneMD, @P_McCulloughMD, @stkirsch, @naomirwolf, @DowdEdward, @Fynnderella1, @PierreKory, @MidwesternDoc, @BusyDrT, @goddeketal, @KLVeritas and countless others who refused to stay silent.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 George Orwell said, “In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” My mission is to keep doing just that, for as long as I can. But a coordinated group is working to stop me, locking me out of my account over 196 times and forcing me to delete my own posts.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 Every single lockout is tagged as a “paid partnership violation”—even for posts that simply summarize a Joe Rogan episode or a Bill Maher podcast, with zero paid promotional content of any kind.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 FULL DISCLOSURE: Most of the flagged posts were legitimate paid partnership violations—back when I was naive about FTC rules and didn’t include proper disclosures. But a coordinated group is combing through my post history, flagging content that’s over a year and a half old.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I currently produce a news program with @zeee_media, and we rely on sponsors to keep the broadcast running. But even with full disclosures, the same coordinated group continues to mass-flag my posts. Their goal isn’t to enforce the rules—it’s an attempt to decimate my business. Take a look at these two side-by-side photos. Both had full disclosure that I benefit from sales—clearly marked as “Paid Partnerships.” And yet, they were still taken down.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media Each “violation” comes with the message: “Please note that repeated violations may lead to a suspension of your account. Proceed to X now to fix the issue with your account.” This looks like an attempt to ban my account and silence my voice for good.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I believe I’m being targeted because they know how influential my voice is. Every day, I spend countless hours digging through news and content, searching for what others ignore or hide. Then, I break it down into easily digestible reports that often disrupt the narrative, highlighting key points I believe everyone deserves to know. And I do it with as much honesty and integrity as I possibly can.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That simple formula has been wildly successful for me. Over the past year on X, my posts have racked up over 3.6 billion impressions, peaking at a pivotal moment: election season. That reach, combined with my ability to deliver hard-hitting reports in real time, poses a serious threat to the mainstream narrative.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media Naturally, there are people who want to sabotage that. Posting on 𝕏 now feels like walking through a minefield. I’ll be mid-post—only to lose everything I had written before getting locked out. Even when that doesn’t happen, the lockouts still send my account into a tailspin.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media Recently, Community Notes rolled out a robustness update that detects and neutralizes coordinated manipulation, specifically when note writers and raters move in lockstep to game the system.

@CommunityNotes - Community Notes

Robustness update: We’ve extended Community Notes ability to detect coordinating contributors with additional features targeting coordination between note writers and raters. When the scoring algo detects anomalous correlations in ratings, it automatically prevents those ratings from contributing to notes achieving helpful status. Unlike systems that might shadow ban or use private data, this system follows Community Notes principles and works entirely on open and public data with open and public effects. Thank you to all the contributors out there. Learn more: https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/under-the-hood/ranking-notes#whats-new

Note ranking algorithm How are Community Notes ranked? Learn more about our open-source algorithm communitynotes.x.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media The same concept urgently needs to be applied to post-flagging. A handful of bad actors have been able to lock me out repeatedly for five straight weeks—with zero consequences. It’s shaken my ability to work and disrupted the operation of my entire social media business.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media If it can happen to me, it can happen to you, it can happen to any creator on this platform.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media @Safety, @elonmusk, @lindayaX—please take urgent action on this critical issue. I love 𝕏 and want to see the platform thrive. But this kind of censorship and coordinated manipulation has no place here, and it must be addressed if 𝕏 is going to live up to its full potential.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading. As mentioned earlier, this targeted attack on my account has seriously damaged my ability to work and operate my social media business. If you’d like to support me and help offset the income I’ve lost, please subscribe for just $3/month. → @VigilantFox It makes a bigger difference than you can imagine.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch @naomirwolf @DowdEdward @Fynnderella1 @zeee_media @Safety @elonmusk @lindayaX And in case of more censorship or retaliation, please consider joining my exclusive email list at http://vigilantfox.com. If I disappear from here, that’s where you’ll still find me—with every report they don’t want you to see.

The Vigilant Fox | Substack Writer, video clipper, and pro-freedom citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience. Tyranny is not possible without compliance. Click to read The Vigilant Fox, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers. vigilantfox.com
Saved - June 28, 2025 at 8:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the alarming phenomenon of COVID vaccine shedding, where unvaccinated individuals report strange symptoms after being near vaccinated people. My investigation, alongside @MidwesternDoc, revealed consistent patterns, including abnormal menstrual bleeding and other health issues. Peer-reviewed studies support these findings, suggesting that exosomes may play a role in transmitting the spike protein. Despite skepticism and censorship, the evidence is compelling. Many affected individuals feel ignored, raising critical questions about vaccine safety and informed consent.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Shocking Truth About COVID Vaccine Shedding The most puzzling part of the COVID injection is its ability to “shed” and harm people who never even got the shot. @MidwesternDoc spent a year investigating over 1,500 of these reports. What emerged is one of the most alarming patterns of the pandemic. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Everyone’s talking about shedding, but almost no one knows what it really is. Shortly after the COVID vaccine rollout, thousands of unvaccinated people started reporting strange symptoms—oftentimes right after being near someone recently vaccinated. They hadn’t gotten the shot. Yet they were sick. And the symptoms were eerily consistent.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Shedding isn’t just some blog theory. It’s backed by peer-reviewed research that was carefully examined by other scientists before being published. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The most common shedding symptom might surprise you—abnormal menstrual bleeding. It was even happening to women long past menopause and to young girls who hadn’t had their first period. Doctors brushed it off. Social media mocked them for asking questions. But the patterns were too strong to ignore. Whatever was happening to these women was very, very real.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Other common symptoms reported by unvaccinated people included: • Flu-like illness • Headaches • Skin rashes • Nosebleeds • Fatigue • Sinus problems • Hair loss • Tinnitus • Shingles • Swollen lymph nodes

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Some said they could even smell something strange—like a metallic, chemical odor—when near someone recently vaccinated for COVID. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It wasn’t just random symptoms. There were patterns. People consistently got sick after being near vaccinated coworkers, family members, or crowds. And now @PierreKory and @MidwesternDoc have analyzed more than 1,500 detailed reports of suspected COVID vaccine shedding cases.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, why is this happening? The theories vary, but the most likely explanation is exosomes—tiny particles the body uses to send messages between cells. After vaccination, the spike protein may be packaged inside exosomes. They’re then exhaled and secreted in sweat. And that’s how they spread.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 2023, a peer-reviewed study found something wild: Unvaccinated children of vaccinated parents were developing antibodies to the spike protein without ever getting COVID or the vaccine. This implies something was transmitted from parent to child. What else could possibly explain it? Another clue: Pfizer's own trial protocol warned about “environmental exposure” from skin contact or inhalation. And the FDA classifies mRNA injections as gene therapy—where shedding is a well-known concern.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc And yes, the 2023 peer-reviewed study even went there—sexual shedding. A lot of people were afraid to talk about it, but the research confirmed what many suspected. People were getting sick after being intimate with vaccinated partners. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc Despite all of this, we were told COVID-19 vaccine shedding was “impossible.” People were being mocked and censored just for asking questions about it. Nothing about this was scientific, yet we were told over and over again to “trust the science.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc has pointed to possible treatments. Things like anti-inflammatories, detox protocols, and specific supplements seem to help. Read more on that below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc Meanwhile, researchers actually found that women who were never vaccinated or infected experienced dramatic menstrual changes after exposure. Disturbingly, one study found that 92% of women reported noticeable disruptions to their menstrual cycle—many within 3 days of exposure.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And sadly, it didn’t just stop at menstrual changes. Some women developed autoimmunity, reactivated viruses like shingles or Epstein-Barr, or even reported life-threatening conditions like blood clots, heart issues, and neurological flare-ups. Unfortunately, these weren’t isolated incidents.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Many of the most sensitive women had pre-existing issues like mold toxicity, fibromyalgia, or previous vaccine injuries. Even pets—cats, dogs, parrots—were affected! One woman said she had to stop visiting her parents after every trip left her bedridden. Another said, “I walked into church, and the second I sat down, I felt it. The same headache, same body ache, same smell. Every time.” A massage therapist said she could no longer work on vaccinated clients without getting sick herself.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I know what you’re thinking. This didn’t happen to you or to someone you know. It sounds almost unbelievable. You’re right. Most people never feel a thing. But for a vulnerable subset of the population, the impacts have been devastating—and they’ve been gaslighted and ignored at every turn. Just because we don’t experience something or know someone who has experienced it doesn’t mean it’s not happening.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc If shedding is real—and the evidence now suggests it is—then we need to ask important questions before it’s too late. Should mRNA vaccines even be allowed on the market if they can affect people who never gave consent?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc That’s what makes this so critical. Shedding means it’s not just about “personal choice.” The unvaccinated may still be impacted—sometimes severely. And yet… we’ve been given no warning. There’s no informed consent. And as always, there’s no accountability.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It’s one of the darkest truths of the COVID pandemic. We were told the vaccines would stay in your arm, and that anyone who said otherwise was a conspiracy theorist. Shedding wasn’t some wild internet myth. It was real. And while people were getting silenced, mocked, and banned for bringing it up, the truth was sitting in the science the entire time. They weren’t just wrong—they were gaslighting us, hard.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc We were told to get vaccinated to protect others. That it wasn’t a “personal choice.” It was for the greater good. And now everything feels upside down. We’re supposed to get vaccinated even though it can harm others? And they don’t get a choice? Make it make sense.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The evidence for shedding is no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s well-documented. It’s measurable. And it’s happening to real people. All mRNA injections must be held to the same safety standards as any other gene therapy. Until then, we’re all part of an uncontrolled experiment. I know I didn’t consent to participate. Did you?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you’ve experienced strange symptoms after being around COVID vaccinated individuals, you're not crazy—and you’re not alone. Thousands of people have shared their stories with @PierreKory and @MidwesternDoc. Their patterns are striking. Their suffering is real. And their voices deserve to be heard.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc For a full deep dive into COVID vaccines and more, don’t miss these other eye-opening articles by @MidwesternDoc: Yale Just Proved COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside The Body https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/yale-proved-covid-vax-injury-exists

Yale Just Proved COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside The Body Reviewing the consequences of the reckless steps used to make the vaccines and the immunological damage which followed midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for

DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc How Do Vaccines Cause Autism? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-autism

How Do Vaccines Cause Autism? Past discoveries that can help us understand the current wave of neurological spike protein injuries. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/yeGG5UQVtt

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 9:46 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states: "We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots." They add: "We also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well." The speaker emphasizes timing: "Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well." They conclude: "And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely." The speaker claims: "We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots. And we also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well. Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well. And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely. We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

🚨BREAKING STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years After COVID-19 Vaccination We report the longest documented persistence of mRNA vaccine components to date, independently confirmed across multiple laboratories, biospecimens, and time points using diverse analytical methods. For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body. Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories. The resulting paper, titled “Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date. A 55-year-old male developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction following three Pfizer mRNA doses, including pulmonary emboli, MRI-confirmed myocarditis, small fiber neuropathy, autonomic dysfunction, neurocognitive impairment, chronic GI involvement, sensorineural hearing loss, dermatologic inflammation, and anxiety/depression. Diagnostic evaluation was extraordinary: 40+ ER visits 200+ specialist encounters (18 disciplines) 100+ lab investigations 100+ imaging/functional studies Infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic causes were systematically excluded. SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively ruled out: 🚫 Nucleocapsid antibodies negative across 5 separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by 3 independent laboratories. 🚫 Nucleocapsid protein absent in serial skin biopsies obtained 1,160–1,364 days post-vaccination — despite clear spike protein deposition in the same specimens. 📈 Meanwhile, spike antibodies remained persistently elevated, including 4,553 U/mL in January 2026 (1,433 days post-vaccination). Serial blood & tissue sampling (852–1,364 days post-vaccination) revealed: 📍Day 852 — SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein detected within classical & non-classical monocyte subsets via blood-based immune phenotyping/flow cytometric analysis, with associated cytokine abnormalities. 📍Day 1,173 — Free Wuhan spike protein detected in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA. 📍Day 1,173 — Spike protein detected in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL) by high-sensitivity ELISA following exosomal isolation. 📍Day 1,284 — Vaccine-derived spike mRNA detected in circulating exosomes by RT-PCR using DNase-treated RNA extraction and amplicon-specific primers targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3). PBMC RNA was negative. 📍Days 1,173 & 1,284 — Persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL; 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL) identified by serologic profiling, consistent with sustained antigen exposure. Serial skin biopsies demonstrated: 📍Day 1,160 — Spike protein deposition in endothelial cells & macrophages detected by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation; nucleocapsid protein absent. 📍Day 1,249 — Persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial and immune cell compartments by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent. 📍Day 1,364 — Spike protein detected in endothelial cells, macrophages, and nerve fibers by immunohistochemistry; nucleocapsid absent in the same specimen. 📍Day 1,364 — Plasmid DNA elements detected in skin tissue — including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and SV40 enhancer fragments — confirmed by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways. Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility. Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04. This longitudinal, multi-laboratory investigation provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine–derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in humans for years following administration, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways. Yes, we were lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Within 36 hours, irrefutable molecular evidence will be released with major global implications. 200+ specialist evaluations across 18 medical disciplines 100+ advanced laboratory investigations 100+ imaging /functional diagnostic studies 70+ alternative diagnoses ruled out https://t.co/6JcAzsEWGd

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:13 AM

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

The most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study ever conducted found that vaccine mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein can persist in humans for at least 3.5 YEARS — independently confirmed across multiple labs, biospecimens, and time points using multiple methods. https://t.co/odfaKuHTgK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes what he claims is the strongest case report ever done on vaccine injury, specifically mRNA vaccine injury. The subject is a 51-year-old man who developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, and skin disturbances, constituting multisystem long vaccine syndrome. The key findings are said to be detected 3.6 years after his last shot. Exosomes circulating in his body allegedly contain Pfizer mRNA, and this mRNA is still present in those exosomes years after vaccination. The same mRNA is reportedly also found in his skin. In addition, plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process is claimed to be present in his skin, again 3.6 years after vaccination. Specifically, the plasmid DNA allegedly includes the SV40 segment, the spike expression cassette, and the open reading frame region, with all components of the plasmids in the Grover's disease–affected skin area. Microscopic analysis of the Grover’s disease area allegedly showed staining for SARS-CoV-2 spike or vaccine spike, indicating the presence of spike protein in that skin region. This staining for spike protein is reported as occurring 3.6 years after the shot. Overall, the speaker asserts that all vaccine components—mRNA, plasmid DNA with defined segments, and spike protein—remain in the body for multiple years, with findings in exosomes and skin indicating long-lasting presence. The speaker also asserts that this represents a situation in which “we were completely lied to.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's probably the strongest case report, ever done on vaccine injury, mRNA vaccine injury. So what we found was in an individual, 51 year old man, he developed myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, neurological disturbances, skin disturbances. So he has multisystem long vaccine syndrome. We found three point six years after his last shot circulating Pfizer mRNA in what's called his exosomes. These kind of bubbles circulate around the body, act as as kind of messengers. So the mRNA is still in there. Pfizer mRNA as well as in his skin. You won't even believe it. We found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process. Again, three point six years after literally just placed in his skin. It was the s v 40 segment of it. It was the spike expression cassette of it and it was the open reading frame region. So all components of the plasmas were in his skin in what's called the Grover's disease area where he developed the skin disease from the shot. And then we looked microscopically inside of this Grover's disease area, and we literally stained it for SARS CoV two spike or vaccine spike, and we found it. It's stained. Third, 3.6 after his shot, he still has spike protein in his skin. And so we found all these vaccine components, it appears they last for multiple years, and we were completely lied to.

@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

x.com/i/article/2018…

Article Cover

STUDY: Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, and Spike Protein Can Persist in Humans More Than 3.5 Years

For years, the public was told that mRNA vaccine materials would degrade within days to weeks — rapidly broken down, biologically transient, and incapable of long-term persistence. That assumption shaped regulatory assurances, public messaging, and safety expectations worldwide. Billions across the globe received these injections based on the claim that the genetic material would quickly disappear from the body.

Today, that narrative collapses — following a coordinated, multi-country investigative effort involving the McCullough Foundation, the INMODIA laboratory (Germany), the Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Germany), Neo7Bioscience, and collaborating independent laboratories.

The resulting paper, titled Unprecedented" target="_blank">https://zenodo.org/records/18460099">Unprecedented Persistence of Vaccine mRNA, Plasmid DNA, Spike Protein, and Genomic Dysregulation Over 3.5 Years Post–COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination,” presents what is, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive COVID-19 vaccine injury case report to date — involving >40 emergency department visits, >200 specialist encounters across 18 medical disciplines, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and serial blood and tissue sampling performed at multiple timepoints over more than 3.5 years.

The findings reveal longitudinal molecular evidence that vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein can persist in human blood and tissue more than 3.5 years after vaccination — independently confirmed across multiple laboratories using diverse analytical methods.

SARS-CoV-2 infection was effectively excluded: nucleocapsid antibodies remained negative across five separate timepoints and three independent laboratories, and nucleocapsid protein was absent in tissue specimens despite the presence of spike protein deposition.

Article image

Case Presentation

We report a 55-year-old male who received three doses of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and subsequently developed progressive multi-organ dysfunction consistent with post-COVID-19 vaccine syndrome (PCVS), involving cardiopulmonary, neurologic, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, autonomic, otolaryngologic, audiovestibular, immune, ophthalmic, dermatologic, and psychiatric domains. Clinical manifestations included: pulmonary emboli; delayed MRI-confirmed myocarditis; neurocognitive impairment; small fiber neuropathy; autonomic dysfunction; myalgia; chronic pancreatic and gastrointestinal involvement; worsened tinnitus with sensorineural hearing loss; voice dysphagia and dysphonia; ophthalmic disturbances; chronic dermatologic inflammation; and anxiety/depression. The case was evaluated through a uniquely extensive longitudinal, multi-domain clinical investigation spanning molecular, immunologic, genetic, proteomic, transcriptomic, and tissue-based analyses, undertaken to characterize disease mechanisms and exclude alternative etiologies.

Article image

Extensive Diagnostic Evaluation

After >40 emergency department visits and >200 outpatient specialty encounters, the patient underwent >100 non-routine laboratory investigations and >100 imaging/functional studies. This evaluation systematically excluded underlying etiologic mechanisms across infectious, autoimmune, rheumatologic, endocrine, genetic, hematologic, malignant, toxic/medication-related, cardiovascular/vascular, metabolic, and primary neurologic domains. Testing remained largely nondiagnostic. A possible undocumented/undiagnosed asymptomatic infection manifesting as Long COVID was suspected after myocarditis diagnosis, and serology was pursued; unexpected results prompted expanded immune and tissue-based testing for spike- and vaccine-derived components. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies were negative across five separate time points spanning 809–1,433 days post-vaccination, confirmed by three independent laboratories. The patient remains nucleocapsid negative with persistently elevated spike antibody levels (4,553 U/mL) 1,433 days after the final vaccination.

Specimen Collection and Analytical Methods

Blood and skin tissue specimens were obtained at multiple time points between 852–1,364 days after the final Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Biological compartments analyzed included plasma, circulating exosomes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and skin tissue. Specimens were evaluated across multiple independent laboratories using diverse analytical methodologies, including ELISA, automated immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, standard PCR with Sanger sequencing confirmation, whole-genome sequencing, transcriptomic profiling, and quantitative mass spectrometry.

Article image

Persistent Circulating Spike Protein and Vaccine-Derived mRNA

At 852 days post-vaccination, blood-based immune testing identified detectable SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein within classical and non-classical monocyte subsets with associated cytokine and immune marker abnormalities.

At 1,173 days post-vaccination, high-sensitivity ELISA detected free Wuhan spike protein in plasma (129.0 ± 4.1 fg/mL) and in circulating exosomes (11.6 ± 0.1 fg/mL).

At 1,284 days, RT-PCR identified vaccine-derived spike mRNA within circulating exosomes, whereas PBMC RNA remained negative following DNase-treated extraction and amplicon-specific PCR targeting three spike ORF regions (S1–S3).

Serologic profiling at 1,173 and 1,284 days post-vaccination demonstrated persistently elevated spike-specific IgG4 concentrations (354.4 ± 22.4 ng/mL and 320.2 ± 4.4 ng/mL, respectively), consistent with ongoing antigenic stimulation and an immune-tolerance–skewed response.

Article image

Persistent Spike Protein and Plasmid DNA in Skin Tissue

Serial skin biopsies at 1,160, 1,249, and 1,364 days post-vaccination, all from truncal skin within areas of clinically active Grover’s disease, were nucleocapsid negative and demonstrated persistent spike protein deposition in endothelial cells and macrophages by automated immunohistochemistry with histopathologic correlation. Spike protein was also found in nerve fibers at 1,364 days.

The 1,364-day skin biopsy contained multiple plasmid DNA elements, including spike gene sequences (S1–S3), ori1/ori2, and the SV40 enhancer, confirming durable retention of vaccine-derived DNA in somatic tissue by PCR amplification with agarose gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing.

Article image

Multi-Omic Analysis

Whole-genome sequencing structural variant analysis at 1,277 days post-vaccination revealed widespread genomic instability, with large duplications and deletions affecting EGFR, MYC, ERBB2, and ETV6/RUNX1, while RNA–DNA comparison showed RNA-only variants in ribosomal, NMD, small-RNA, epigenetic, and TP53 pathways.

Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood highlighted oxidative stress, vascular activation, and nuclear fragility.

Urine proteomics using quantitative mass spectrometry confirmed systemic inflammation with complement overactivation (CFH), redox imbalance (PRDX1), and sustained antibody responses, supported by risk alleles HLA-B07:02 and DRB1*11:04.

Conclusion

This case documents the longest reported in vivo persistence of vaccine-derived mRNA, plasmid DNA fragments, and spike protein following mRNA vaccination, with reproducible detection across multiple independent laboratories, distinct biological compartments, and complementary molecular detection systems extending beyond 3.5 years after the final dose. Spike protein, spike mRNA sequences, and plasmid backbone elements were identified in both immune cells and somatic tissue, with continued absence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein or antibodies, effectively excluding prior infection as the source. The convergence of these observations across longitudinal blood and tissue sampling provides direct evidence that mRNA vaccine-derived genetic material and its translated protein products can persist in vivo for years following administration.

In parallel, multi-omic analyses revealed sustained genomic instability and transcriptomic dysregulation more than 3.5 years post-vaccination, suggesting that persistent vaccine-derived material may be associated with long-term alterations in host genomic and molecular pathways.

These data challenge prevailing assumptions regarding rapid degradation and short-lived biological activity of mRNA vaccine components and underscore the need for controlled longitudinal studies to determine prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical consequences of persistent vaccine-derived material.