TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson: "Zelensky is a dangerous authoritarian who has used $100 billion in US tax dollars to erect a one-party police state in Ukraine." https://t.co/YqW3Tdd5K8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky's actions in Ukraine reveal a troubling authoritarianism, as he has banned opposition parties, shut down critical media, and arrested political opponents. Recently, he announced plans to ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, claiming it poses a threat due to its ties to Russia, despite its denunciation of the invasion. This move has been largely ignored or excused by U.S. leaders and media, who continue to support Zelensky as a defender of freedom. However, the reality is that Ukrainians face severe restrictions on their rights, including worship and political expression. The Ukrainian government is prioritizing its power over democratic principles, raising questions about the true nature of the support being given to them by the West.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whatever you think of the war in Ukraine, it is pretty clear that Zelensky has no interest in freedom and democracy. In fact, Zelensky is far closer to Lenin than to George Washington. He's a dictator. He's a dangerous authoritarian who has used a 100,000,000,000 in US tax dollars to erect a 1 party police state in Ukraine, and that's not an overstatement. Over the past year, Zelensky has banned opposition parties.
He shut down critical media by force. He's arrested his political opponents. He has sent soldiers into churches. Zelenskyy secret police have raided monasteries across Ukraine. Even a convent full of nuns and arrested dozens of priests for no justifiable reason whatsoever and in clear violation of the Ukrainian constitution, which no longer matters.
And in the face of this, the Biden administration has said nothing, not one word. Instead, they just continue to push to send Zelensky more tax dollars. So naturally, Zelensky has become much bolder. Why wouldn't he? Last week, he announced his plan to ban an entire religion, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and to seize its property all for being insufficiently loyal to his regime.
And he said it out loud. Watch this.
Speaker 1: We have to create such conditions when any people dependent on the country aggressor won't be able to manipulate Ukrainians and weaken Ukraine from within. 1st, the National Security and Defense Council instructed the government to submit to the Verhobnara, a draft law on making it impossible for religious organizations affiliated with centers of influence in the Russian Federation to operate in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: A free country does not ban a major religion just because it's not fully on board with the political program of the people running the country. But Zelensky is doing that, and his cabinet is now devising ways to punish Christians for practicing their banned ancient religion in Ukraine. Quote, personal economic and restrictive sanctions will be applied to any Christian caught worshiping in unapproved ways. Now the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is more than a 1000 years old. With the full backing of the Joe Biden administration in the US Congress, Zelensky has decided to ban it.
So here's the response of 1 bishop to the news. You're not allowed to send soldiers into churches. You're not allowed to arrest dozens of priests because they refuse to bow before you. You're not allowed to ban whole religions. So most of the US media, most have just ignored this.
Some have made excuses for it. Oh, he has to do this because there's a war, but there's no justification for this whatsoever. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church is not Russian. It's Ukrainian. It has no connection to the Putin government.
It is in fact officially denounced the Russian invasion of Ukraine. So once again, there is no justification for destroying and banning this church. And yet Zelensky's many celebrity backers in the west have said nothing about it, and they should know better. In May, George w Bush, the great defender of Christendom, met with Zelensky on a Zoom call and afterward described him as the Winston Churchill of our time, a man who should be praised for his, quote, commitment to liberty. So where's George w Bush on this question now that his friend, the George Washington of Ukraine, has banned a form of Christianity in that country?
Well, George w Bush has been silent as well. So have many purportedly Christian members of congress. They're backing as Zelensky no matter how many Christians he arrests, no matter how many churches he seizes. To the Ukrainian people, you can expect the congress to to be there with you in terms of supporting your efforts to maintain your freedom.
Speaker 2: Everything that we can do, to be helpful to them as they fight for as they fight for their freedom.
Speaker 0: I think the history of the 21st century turns on how fiercely we defend freedom in Ukraine.
Speaker 3: We will continue to provide military equipment so that Ukraine can defend its territory and its freedom. United States will continue our unwavering support for Ukraine as it defends its freedom.
Speaker 0: And let's get the job done so that we can save lives in Ukraine and defend the cause of freedom.
Speaker 4: The free world had no choice. America could not stand by. The American people did what they always have done, defend freedom around the world.
Speaker 0: Every single person you just watched has campaigned many to make a habit of campaigning Lindsey Graham, ladies and gentlemen, in Christian churches in the United States. Well, a single Christian leader say anything to them about this? You are funding the destruction of Christianity in Ukraine? Oh, but it's the cause of freedom. Really?
The reality is that Ukrainians cannot listen to media outlets that criticize the Zelensky government because they've been banned. They cannot play music from Russian singers. No. This is not in Taliban controlled Afghanistan. This is in the democracy of Ukraine that we support.
They can't play music for Russian singers. They can't vote for an opposition party because they've all been shut down. And now their churches are being raided and their priests arrested. So the fact that our leaders are calling this freedom tells you a lot about what they're planning here. Of course, why would you defend this?
Because you approve of it. For its part, Ukraine's defense ministry has stopped pretending this is about freedom. They're just happy they're getting paid, and they're finally crushing any opposition in their own country.
reSee.it AI Summary
A divisive figure, this man is seen by some as a destructive force, while others view him as a typical corrupt leader. In 2019, he was elected with a strong mandate for peace. However, there are those who accuse him of crimes and betrayal. Watch "Agent Zelensky - Part 1" for more.
@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
This man will go down in history as the person who destroyed his own country for fame and fortune. This man will go down in history as first-class crook, of which there have been many in history. In 2019, Zelensky was elected on an overwhelming mandate to make peace with Russia. Zelensky committed too many crimes and betrayed his people. He deserved Hitler's fate. Agent Zelensky - Part 1 https://youtu.be/HLeBb6hPUC8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukrainian President, Zelensky, owns properties in Miami, Israel, Italy, London, Georgia, and Crimea. His real estate holdings include a villa in Tuscany, a house in Israel, an apartment in London, and multiple apartments in Georgia. However, his penthouse in Crimea, purchased before Russian control, could pose political risks. Zelensky's total real estate assets are extensive, but he has not transferred them to his children. This has led to criticism of his perceived stinginess and greed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's go. Firstly, a villain in Miami for himself worth $34,000,000. I've been to Florida and can understand the taste of the president of Ukraine. Secondly, a house in Israel for his parents on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. It's worth $8,000,000.
Europe, Zalewski prefers Italy. Tuscany, the best wines. By the way, one of the most expensive resorts in the country, Forte d'Alle Marbi. Houses here are worth their waiting goal. In 2017, together with his wife, he bought a villa 600 meters from the sea.
According to the declaration, it was worth about $3,800,000 at that time. Is that all? Not at all. From the south, we moved north, not to Siberia, of course, but to London, old center, legendary Baker Street, opposite the Sherlock Holmes Museum. There's another Zelensky residence, An apartment worth $3,000,000.
Why? Probably the state will visit his owners with a report. More on that later. Apparently, the real estate was purchased through the company of his business partner, Sergei Schiffer. That's why he's called Zelensky's personal wallet in Ukraine.
I almost forgot about real estate. Georgia, not the state, the country. A new multi story apart hotel in the city of Batumi. You might ask, Batumi? What is that?
Well, take a look. It's also a seaside resort. Apartments are under renovation with an expensive finish, panoramic windows, and views in the city and the mountains. Hence, it is built for well-to-do people. At least 5 apartments here belong to Zelensky.
Finally, the settlement of Levadia, an elite residential complex emperor.
Speaker 1: Look. A magnificent view of Zelensky's house opens up. Here it is, a seashore over there.
Speaker 0: Lions, wide staircases, and columns. On the roof, there's a luxurious terrace, a pool, and a wonderful sea view. But guys, it's Crimea. Crimea, which is currently under Russian control. Zelensky made a mistake here, and the Russians will surely figure out how to use it to their advantage.
Zelensky's penthouse was purchased here in 2013, right before the so called Crimean spring. Nowadays such a property could be worth about $1,000,000. However, a different amount is stated in his declaration. 1,384,000 Hibernias or about $164,000. Well, we don't even need to mention the real estate in chief or the official residence of the head of the republic in Concha Zaspa.
Even without those, it's quite a collection of villas, houses, and apartments. However, the Ukrainian president is in no rush to give them to children, at least not to other people's children. Unfortunately, we have to admit the obvious. Volodymyr Zelensky has always been stingy and greedy.
@AndyOstroy - Andy Ostroy
Zelensky is a hero. And he has more integrity in one nostril hair than you have in your entire being
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukrainian President Zelensky faced criticism for honoring Yaroslav Hunk, a former Nazi. Hunk fought with the Waffen SS, aiding in the extermination of Ukraine's Jewish population and the establishment of a Nazi regime. Zelensky's applause for this 98-year-old Nazi raises questions about his true intentions. The incident highlights the need to question our stance on such matters.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨 Zelensky Honors Literal Nazi 🚨 Meet Yaroslav Hunk. Hunk is a Nazi who fought with the 14th division of the Waffen SS against the Russians in Ukraine in WWll Hunk assisted in the systematic extermination of Ukraines Jewish population and installation of a Nazi dictator in the region. Hunk also engaged in the wholesale slaughter of Ukrainian people and entire villages disloyal to Hitler. Zelensky lead Canadian parliament in a roaring, standing round of applause for a this 98 year-old Nazi. They honored the Nazi as a “hero” What does this say about Zelensky’s true goals & worldview? Guys, what side are we on?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky's speech received numerous standing ovations, including one for a 98-year-old Ukrainian Canadian who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians in World War II.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Zelensky's speech received at least a dozen standing ovations. There was also one for this man, a 98 year old Ukrainian Canadian who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians during the 2nd World War.
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent controversy surrounding NaziGate has exposed the hypocrisy of both liberals and conservatives. It is evident that our political leaders lack competence and independent thinking. They obediently follow instructions, applauding and voting as they are told. This entire system is filled with sold-out individuals masquerading as leaders. Blaming the liberals alone won't solve anything. None of these politicians can even lead us to a bathroom, let alone guide our nation. The standing ovation for Zelensky, a war criminal, highlights their ignorance and moral bankruptcy. Ethnic cleansing, silencing opposition, and targeting civilians are all atrocities that Zelensky has been involved in for years. These politicians are truly full of hypocrisy.
@Jeremy_MacKenzi - Jeremy MacKenzie
#NaziGate Liberal pile-on is the most embarrassing thing I've witnessed in a while The conservatives are actually pretending like their entire team isn't guilty of exactly the same incompetence and idiocy as they stood right beside them and clapped The truth to take away here is that all 338 seats have no idea what they're doing or talking about. They clap for whoever they're told to clap for. They read what they're told to read, and they vote how they're told to vote. It's an entire building of sold out automatons posing as leadership, but yall want to keep insisting we gotta 'get da libs out!' Like that's going solve anything. No one in federal politics is capable of leading anyone in this country to a bathroom, nevermind an entire nation away from catastrophe. The fact all these people just did a standing ovation for one of the world's worst living war criminals (Zelensky) is proof of their ignorance and moral bankruptcy. Oh you're outraged about "muh nazis" ? Why? Because ethnic cleansing, outlawing opposition, killing journalists and targeting civilians is bad? Like Zelensky has been doing for years? K. They're the most full of shit people alive.
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin criticizes the former Canadian Speaker of the House and questions Trudeau and Zelensky's standing ovation for a Nazi. The author finds it ironic that those who accuse Putin of being a Nazi applaud the same behavior. The author also claims that previous claims of Ukraine being influenced by Nazis were proven right.
@GStrand45 - G.Strand
Putin says that the former Canadian Speaker of the House is an idiot or bastard after Trudeau and Zelensky inexplicably gave a nazi a standing ovation. How comical is it that the people calling Putin a nazi have now held a standing ovation for the exact thing they claim to hate... When anons said Ukraine was influenced and controlled by nazis, many called us conspiracy theorists.. Ah.. But I guess we were right this entire time again, weren't we?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the Ukrainian President for applauding a Nazi collaborator, stating that he either lacks basic knowledge or is a scoundrel. They emphasize that fighting alongside Hitler's forces during World War II makes one a collaborator, not a hero. The speaker expresses respect for Canada but condemns any praise for individuals who supported the Nazis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Отвратительным выглядит то, что все аплодируют, аплодировали этому нацисту. И особенно президент Украины, в жилах которого течет еврейская кровь, еврей по национальности, стоит и аплодирует нацисту не просто последующего нацистов, не просто идейному последователю, а именно человеку, который своими руками уничтожал еврейское население. Это он лично уничтожал. Если спикер канадского парламента говорит о том, что во время Второй мировой войны этот канадско-украинский или украино-канадский нацист сражался против русских во время Второй мировой войны, он не может не понимать, что он сражался на стороне Гитлера, а не на стороне его собственной родины Канады, или был фашистским коллаборационистом, в любом случае сражался на стороне нацистских войск. Допустим, он этого не знает.
Я ни в коем случае не хочу обидеть чувства канадского народа. Мы относимся к Канаде несмотря ни на что с уважением, особенно к людям. Но если он не знает, что во время войны против России сражался Гитлер и его приспешники, то он идиот. Значит, он просто в школе не учился, не имеет элементарных знаний. А если он знает, что этот человек сражался на стороне Гитлера, и называет его героем Украины и героем Канады, то он негодяй.
Или так, или
@Truth_InMedia - Truth In Media
Volodymyr Zelenskyy isn't who you think he is. Woke celebrities and warmongering politicians adore him, but very few Americans know about the shadowy billionaires backing this actor-turned-president. Episode 2 of "Zelenskyy Unmasked" is here... https://t.co/YCzVx4VipV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Zelensky, a former actor turned president of Ukraine, is backed by oligarchs, including Igor Kolomoisky, who controlled his rise to power. Despite being portrayed as a hero by the media, Zelensky has failed to deliver on his promises, leading to growing authoritarianism in Ukraine. Critics question his true intentions in the ongoing conflict with Russia, suggesting he may be a puppet for larger interests. The truth behind Zelensky's leadership and who is truly in control remains a mystery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vladimir Zelensky isn't quite who he's portrayed to be. Even if you believe that he is a righteous servant of democracy, one thing is without a doubt, he is an actor in more ways than one. But he's not an actor who simply became president. He had backing. What virtually no American knows about Zelensky is that he appears to be backed by shadowy billionaires accountable to no one other than their own business interests.
Zelensky's image isn't something that just happened. It appears to be carefully coordinated and orchestrated. Zelensky as a leader is being portrayed by the dominant mainstream media as a noble saint, selfless, brave, chic even. A hero to woke actors and warmongering politicians alike, Zelensky is the world's biggest celebrity, and he's being billed as something more. He is the new George Washington, the new Winston Churchill.
So what's the truth? I'm Ben Swan, and this is Zelenskyy Unmasked.
Speaker 1: And who was Zelensky? I mean, this is a guy that used to play the piano with his penis when he was a comedian playing the president of the Ukraine. Ukraine.
Speaker 2: The history of Zelensky is interesting, and it's exactly what you would expect for a person who, is acting as the president of a country right now. He was in a TV show, a servant of the people, and he was a comedian. And in that TV show, he was a teacher who became president. And he wanted the country to join NATO and join the EU and all of the things that, you know, he's acting as now. So then his financial backers then started a party, and they called that party the servant of the people party.
And they ran him as president with exactly the same platform that he had in the television show.
Speaker 0: Vladimir Zelensky didn't just become president of Ukraine. Not surprisingly, he had help. What mainstream media won't tell you is where that help came from. A name you've probably never heard, Igor Kolomoisky is one of Ukraine's leading oligarchs, and he's the owner of the 1 plus 1 media group, one of Ukraine's largest media conglomerates. Kolomoisky's network aired Zelensky's hit TV show, Servant of the People, the one that made him a star.
Kolomoisky also has been accused of being one of the most notorious gangsters in Ukrainian history. He's accused of embezzling 1,000,000,000 of dollars and of hiring people to kill his rivals. That aside, Ukraine's worst kept secret is that Kolomoisky was pulling the strings of Zelensky's presidential campaign. And even though he's Jewish, US government officials claim that Kolomoisky was the brainchild and bank roller of Ukraine's Neo Nazi Azov battalion. Soon after Zelensky's servant of the people party was launched, Kolomoisky got the attention of the FBI.
The US justice department claims that his Privat Bank ran a Ponzi scheme, which stole 1,000,000,000 from investors and hid $70,000,000 of it in the United States. It was Kolomoisky's money and the enormous power he wielded, which was needed to complete Zelensky's transformation from TV to his country's top man.
Speaker 3: The show was so popular and Ukrainian presidents were so bad that they took him, ran him, and he beat the people, not because he's qualified, but because they were so sick of the old system. They thought this actor could pretend to be president better than presidents were actually being president.
Speaker 2: So clearly, it was a production to create a television show and then eventually turn it into a party. But they knew that the people of Ukraine wanted peace as most people in most countries want.
Speaker 4: Ukraine At least he's promised to end the war. That's what we are hoping for.
Speaker 2: So he ran as a peace candidate, and he ran arguing that he would push for peace with Russia, peace reversal, and he went in the direction that his backers wanted. Zelenskyy took reversal, and he went in the direction that his backers wanted.
Speaker 0: Zelensky took office in 2019 amidst the catastrophic collapse of public confidence in Ukraine's government and frustration with that society's endemic corruption. Hope quickly turned to despair, however, once it became clear that under Zelensky, nothing had changed. The economy remained in shambles. Corruption was still rampant, and the Donbas war still raged on. Zelensky had failed to live up to any of his promises.
Speaker 3: The war comes, and they take this man with 23% popularity who shut down all democracy, and we turn him into Winston Churchill.
Speaker 0: And pretty soon, Zelensky was everywhere on the cover of Time, Newsweek, Wired, Vanity Fair. He was even photographed for vote. You can't make this stuff up. He and his wife post for cover photos while he was in the midst of leading a war, supposedly for his country's survival. Really?
And he had time for this. Actually, he had time for this and a lot more. The actor turned president also made his way to the US stage by recording messages, which were played live at the Grammy's and the Golden Globes. He rang the bell at Wall Street virtually, and he visited congress live and in person. A weird sand statue of him was erected in Estonia, and congressman Joe Wilson, a republican from South Carolina, introduced a bill to erect a permanent bust of Zelensky at the US Capitol.
By the way, you can now purchase a miniature version of this would be bust on Amazon for 1999.
Speaker 5: He was selected to act in this role, and he's doing a fantastic job as an actor. Quite frankly, this is the role of a lifetime, and he's killing it.
Speaker 0: And it's clear that Zelensky got a lot of help in prepping for this role.
Speaker 6: So, basically, today, the Ukraine is run by the deep state, the the military in in in Washington, the people who want war to make money from war, the in in the military industrial complex in United States, and Zelensky is a puppet within this whole big show.
Speaker 2: It was from the very beginning, this was some kind of a in my opinion, it was some kind of an intelligence pushed, media operation to this day. And that's why he's always behind green screens. That's always why he's doing covers for various magazines, etcetera, because this is really a production for people worldwide to think that they have a president of a country, and he's just a hollow figure.
Speaker 0: Here's Here's something you're not gonna see on CNN. Throughout history, intelligence agencies have invested massive amounts of money to manage public relations campaigns. That's just a fact. These campaigns have been waged to spread disinformation in the interest of getting public opinion behind a war. And you don't have to look very far back in the past to find examples.
I'll give you one right here. 1990, a girl from Kuwait who said her name was Nayira, testified that she witnessed babies being taken out of incubators and killed by Saddam Hussein's forces. Turned out, that was a lie. And the girl wasn't just some random girl, She was the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, Saud al Sabah. The story about the incubators, by the way, it never happened.
But it was too late once we knew for sure. The publicity campaign associated with that lie swayed public opinion against Saddam Hussein and in favor of a US invasion of Kuwait. 12 years later, US secretary of state Colin Powell took his turn at lying with an eye towards Iraq. Remember this famous shot of him holding up vials of those biological weapons samples? He testified before the world that the country had weapons of mass destruction.
This bold faced lie prompted the US invasion of Iraq and the deaths of over 1,000,000 Iraqi people. So the question that thinking people must grapple with, could the same thing be happening in the case of Ukraine?
Speaker 2: It's interesting because for the most part, that, that production has been successful. He's been pushed as a, you know, a hero of democracy and this poor kind of you know, this small democratic free country has been attacked by a brutal and angry emotional person, not a country. It's it's the the traditional Marvel Comics hero villain scenario. He's a hero. He's a good guy, stands for everything good, and he's attacked by the equivalent of Lex Luther in a Superman movie, which would be Vladimir the evil Vladimir Putin.
And they've been, you know, pretty successful with with that in the United States simply because that's the only story that's allowed to get out.
Speaker 0: The reality of things in Ukraine are much more grim. Under Zelensky's watch, the Russian language has come under attack as has the Orthodox church. Alternative media outlets have been banned as have opposition political parties. Zelensky's cult like status in the west is masking the rising tide of authoritarianism in Ukraine. And not just that.
It appears that even Zelensky is starting to believe his own hype.
Speaker 3: Now he actually believes he's a man of gravitas, that he is Winston Churchill.
Speaker 0: Like the original Churchill, Zelensky isn't necessarily all about peace either, even though the PR machine that surrounds him tells us that he is. As numerous military analysts have asked, what's the endgame here? There's much agreement that long term, Ukraine doesn't really have much of a chance in this war. So why is there no effort toward peace?
Speaker 3: 10 years from now, when they write the history of this conflict, he's gonna be the most reviled man in the world because he is responsible for
Speaker 0: for the
Speaker 3: deaths of 100 of 1000 of Ukrainians. Hundreds of thousands of people he swore to protect, he slaughtered. For what? Because he's addicted to weapons infused, ego driven narcissism.
Speaker 4: Ukraine is becoming a nation of widows and orphans. There's 300,000 dead Ukrainians. Douglas McGregor would say 350,000. All right, I'll go on the conservative side there and 30,000 Russians. I don't know, they see the figures 101, whatever.
Let's say 400 1,000, 500,000, whatever it is. It all could have been avoided. This all and you know what? Nobody in DC that's connected, whether it be Raytheon, Victoria Nuland, Joe Biden, Lloyd Austin, they don't give a rat's ass about any of those Ukrainian vets at all.
Speaker 2: Zelensky is part of a pattern right now throughout the US empire where you put an actor in place who appears to be making decisions, but he's not. So he's just another one of many, and they bring him out, and he does what he's told.
Speaker 0: If Zelensky just does what he's told, that would mean he's a hollow leader. It also means somebody else is pulling the strings. Who is it that appears to be telling Zelensky what to do, what to think, what to say? Who is really running Ukraine? We'll investigate as we continue to unmask Zelensky.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
Zelensky is a fraud, backed by a brutal Gangster Oligarch. The Actor turned President is just that, an Actor His "role of a lifetime" is now a Nightmare for his people who desperately elected him to bring Peace and an end to Corruption. The Dictator brought more of both. https://t.co/A6b4hnG6Cs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky, a former comedian, was propelled into politics by oligarch Kolomoisky, who funded his campaign. Despite promises of peace, Zelensky's presidency has been marked by economic turmoil, corruption, and ongoing conflict. He has been portrayed as a hero in the West, but his actions in Ukraine suggest a growing authoritarian regime. Critics argue that Zelensky is a puppet controlled by unseen forces, leading to unnecessary bloodshed and suffering in Ukraine. The true power behind Zelensky's presidency remains a mystery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And who is Zelensky? I mean, this is a guy that used to play the piano with his penis when he was a comedian playing the president of the Ukraine.
Speaker 1: The history of Zelensky is interesting, and it's exactly what you would expect for a person who, is acting as the president of a country right now. He was in a TV show, a servant of the people, and he was a comedian. And in that TV show, he was a teacher who became president. And he wanted the country to join NATO and join the EU and all of the things that, you know, he's acting as now. So then his financial backers backers then started a party, and they called that party the servant of the people party.
And they ran him as president with exactly the same form that he had in the television show.
Speaker 2: Vladimir Zelensky didn't just become president of Ukraine. Not surprisingly, he had help. What mainstream media won't tell you is where that help came from. A name you've probably never heard. Igor Kolomoisky is one of Ukraine's leading oligarchs, and he's the owner of the 1 plus 1 media group, one of Ukraine's largest media conglomerates.
Kolomoisky's network aired Zelensky's hit TV show, Servant of the People, the one that made him a star. Kolomoisky also has been accused of being one of the most notorious gangsters in Ukrainian history. He's accused of embezzling 1,000,000,000 of dollars and of hiring people to kill his rivals. That aside, Ukraine's worst kept secret is that Kolomoisky was pulling the strings of Zelensky's presidential campaign. And even though he's Jewish, US government officials claim that Kolomoisky was the brainchild and bank roller of Ukraine's Neo Nazi Azov battalion.
Soon after Zelensky's servant of the people party was launched, Kolomoisky got the attention of the FBI. The US justice department claims that his Privat Bank ran a Ponzi scheme, which stole 1,000,000,000 from investors and hid $70,000,000 of it in the United States. It was Kolomoyeski's money and the enormous power he wielded, which was needed to complete Zelenski's transformation from TV personality to his country's top man.
Speaker 3: The show was so popular and Ukrainian presidents were so bad that they took him, ran him, and he beat the people, not because he's qualified, but because they were so sick of the old system. I thought this actor could pretend
Speaker 1: to be president better than presidents were actually being president. So clearly, it was a production to create a television show and then eventually turn it into a party, but they knew that the people of Ukraine wanted peace as most people in most countries want.
Speaker 4: But, at least, he's promised to end the war. That's what we are hoping for.
Speaker 1: So he ran as a peace candidate, and he ran arguing that he would push for peace with Russia, peace with the Donbas, etcetera. And he won. Of course, when he won, unfortunately, he did a complete, political reversal, and he went in the direction that his backers wanted.
Speaker 2: Zelensky took office in 2019 amidst the catastrophic collapse of public confidence in Ukraine's government and frustration with that society's endemic corruption. Hope quickly turned to despair, however, once it became clear that under Zelensky, nothing had changed. The economy remained in shambles. Corruption was still rampant, and the Donbas war still raged on. Zelensky had failed to live up to any of his promises.
Speaker 3: The war comes, and they take this man with 23% popularity who shut down all democracy and we turn him into Winston Churchill.
Speaker 2: And pretty soon, Zelensky was everywhere on the cover of Time, Newsweek, Wired, Vanity Fair. He was even photographed for Vogue. You can't make this stuff up. He and his wife posed for cover photos while he was in the midst of leading a war, supposedly for his country's survival. Really?
And he had time for this. Actually, he had time for this and a lot more. The actor turned president also made his way to the US stage by recording messages, which were played live at the Grammy's and the Golden Globes. He rang the bell at Wall Street virtually, and he visited congress live and in person. A weird sand statue of him was erected in Estonia, and congressman Joe Wilson, a republican from South Carolina, introduced a bill to erect a permanent bust of Zelensky at the US Capitol.
By the way, you can now purchase a miniature version of this would be bust on Amazon for 19.99.
Speaker 4: He was selected to act in this role, and he's doing a fantastic job as an actor. Quite frankly, this is the role of a lifetime, and he's killing it.
Speaker 2: And it's clear that Zelensky got a lot of help in prepping for this role.
Speaker 5: So, basically, today, the Ukraine is run by the deep state, the the military in in Washington, the people who want war to make money from war, the in in the military industrial complex in the United States, and Zelensky is a puppet within this whole big show.
Speaker 1: It was from the very beginning, this was some kind of a in my opinion, it was some kind of an intelligence pushed, media operation to this day. And that's why he's always behind green screens. That's always why he's doing covers for various magazines, etcetera, because this is really a production for people worldwide to think that they have a president of a country, and he's just a hollow
Speaker 2: figure. Here's something you're not gonna see on CNN. Throughout history, intelligence agencies have invested massive amounts of money to manage public relations campaigns. That's just a fact. These campaigns have been waged to spread disinformation in the interest of getting public opinion behind a war.
And you don't have to look very far back in the past to find examples. I'll give you one right here. Here. 1990, a girl from Kuwait who said her name was Nayira, testified that she witnessed babies being taken out of incubators and killed by Saddam Hussein's forces. Turned out, that was a lie.
And the girl wasn't just some random girl, she was the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, Saud al Sabah. The story about the incubators, by the way, it never happened. But it was too late, once we knew for sure. The publicity campaign associated with that lie swayed public opinion against Saddam Hussein and in favor of a US invasion of Kuwait. 12 years later, US secretary of state Colin Powell took his turn at lying with an eye towards Iraq.
Remember this famous shot of him holding up vials of those biological weapon samples? He testified before the world that the country had weapons of mass destruction. This bold faced lie prompted the US invasion of Iraq and the deaths of over 1,000,000 Iraqi people. So the question that thinking people must grapple with, could the same thing be happening in the case of Ukraine?
Speaker 1: It's interesting because for the most part, that, that production has been successful. He's been pushed as a, you know, a hero of democracy, and this poor kind of the you know, this small democratic free country has been attacked by a brutal and angry emotional person, not a country. It's it's the the traditional Marvel Comics hero villain scenario. He's a hero. He's a good guy.
Stands for everything good, and he's attacked by the equivalent of Lex Luther in a Superman movie, which would be Vladimir the evil Vladimir Putin. And they've been, you know, pretty successful with with that in the United States simply because that's the only story that's allowed to get out.
Speaker 2: The reality of things in Ukraine are much more grim. Under Zelensky's watch, the Russian language has come under attack as has the orthodox church. Alternative media outlets have been banned as have opposition political parties. Zelensky's cult like status in the west is masking the rising tide of authoritarianism in Ukraine. And not just that, it appears that even Zelensky is starting to believe his own hype.
Speaker 3: Now he actually believes he's a man of gravitas, that he is Winston Churchill.
Speaker 2: Like the original Churchill, Zelensky isn't necessarily all about peace either, even though the PR machine that surrounds him tells us that he is. As numerous military analysts have asked, what's the end game here? There's much agreement that long term, Ukraine doesn't really have much of a chance in this war. So why is there no effort toward peace?
Speaker 3: 10 years from now, when they write the history of this conflict, he's gonna be the most reviled man in the world because he is responsible for the deaths of 100 of 1000 of Ukrainians. Hundreds of thousands of people he swore to protect, he slaughtered. For what? Because he's addicted to weapons infused, ego driven narcissism. Ukraine is becoming a nation of widows and orphans.
Speaker 6: There's 300,000 dead Ukrainians. Douglas McGregor would say 350,000. Alright. I'll go on the conservative side there and 30,000 Russians. I don't know.
They see the figures 10 to 1. Whatever it is. Let's say 400,000, 500,000, whatever it is. It all could have been avoided. This all and you know what?
Nobody in DC that's connected, whether it be Raytheon, Victoria Nuland, Joe Biden, Lloyd Austin, they don't give a rat's ass about any of those Ukrainian vets at all.
Speaker 1: Zelensky is part of a pattern right now throughout the US empire where you put an actor in place who appears to be making decisions, but he's not. So he's just another one of many, and they bring him out, and he does what he's told.
Speaker 2: If Zelensky just does what he's told, that would mean he's a hollow leader. It also means somebody else is pulling the strings. Who is it that appears to be telling Zelensky what to do, what to think, what to say? Who was really running Ukraine? We'll investigate as we continue to unmask Zelensky.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Did you know that in 2006 Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky won the Ukraine TV Competition - Dancing with the Stars? Then the US Coop in 2014 in Ukraine happened & he became President The US Congress just approved another $60,000,000,000 to this man The entire World is a stage.
@BowesChay - Chay Bowes
The fact Boris Johnston is seen as a "Hero" in Dictator Zelenskys Kiev says a lot about the Ukrainian Cabal and their "partners" Johnston is a serial liar, fake, fraud, and explotative megalomaniac. (In good company with Zelensky) Here's the proof. https://t.co/xx310AJkH9
@JoeyMannarinoUS - Joey Mannarino
Zelenskyy just essentially endorsed Kamala in Pennsylvania while with Josh Shapiro autographing ammunition. He called Trump and Vance “radical”. He also said Trump has no idea how to end the war. How is this not some sort of violation from a man who we are funding? https://t.co/HTfM9VkPsz
@shannon_alter - Watching The Defectives
@CNviolations Zelenskyy is a very strange dude! https://t.co/CwUExChlzO
@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
The REAL Zelensky Zelensky is a criminal. He's shut down churches. Dragging Christian men with crosses around their neck to their death. Corrupt oligarch. Suspended elections. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: Zelensky is a danger to the world. https://t.co/Haczvhy3Af https://t.co/fwS7Hoi5Di
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's absurd to claim one person is worse than another. We oppose the war for various reasons: it's a form of money laundering, it's harming Christians, and it's unnecessary. Even the New York Times previously described Zelensky as corrupt. Now, he's suspended elections, shut down churches, and is conscripting young Christian men to die. I view Zelensky as equally corrupt and criminal. I've seen videos of him dragging Christian men to their deaths, which is appalling. He is responsible for misappropriating billions of dollars, with no accountability for where the money is going. I find him utterly despicable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's about realizing that trying to tell us that this person is worse than this person is a nonsense. We do not support the war for a ton of reasons because it's money laundering, because it's killing Christians, and because we don't have to. I understand. I'm sure you may recall since you seem to be an avid follower of my tweets where I pointed out that even the New York Times was talking about how corrupt Zelensky was just a couple of years before the war. They were describing him as a corrupt old man.
But that wasn't my question. He's now suspended elections. He's shut down churches. Okay? He is conscripting young Christian men to their deaths.
I believe Zelensky is just as corrupt. I believe he is a criminal. I'm watching videos of him dragging Christian men with crosses around their neck to their death. He sickens me. He is the person that is taking 1,000,000,000 of dollars away from us.
It's magically all being lost. They just don't know where all this money is going to. I find him to be absolutely despicable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scott Ritter, a former U.S. Marine Corps intelligence officer, discusses Volodymyr Zelensky's rise to power, highlighting his role in the TV series "Servant of the People," which set the stage for his presidential campaign. Zelensky's election was seen as a manipulation of public perception, aided by oligarch Igor Kolomoisky and U.S. intelligence. Despite promises of reform and anti-corruption, Zelensky's administration is accused of embezzlement and maintaining ties with corrupt practices. His wealth, including luxury properties, contrasts with his public persona as a man of the people. The narrative suggests that Zelensky serves Western interests, particularly in the context of the ongoing conflict with Russia, raising questions about his independence and the influence of foreign powers on Ukraine's political landscape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon. My name is Scott Ritter. Allow me to introduce myself for those who don't know me. I'm a former United States Marine Corps intelligence officer. I participated in Operation Desert Storm and served as the chief weapons inspector for the United Nations in Iraq.
My main interests are international relations and armed conflicts in different parts of the world. I'm convinced that we all should know a little more about a person who, to the applause of those I call the global elite, is ready to fight to the last Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. Mister president, there have been numerous publications about you, but everything seems to disappear from the web. Your image is carefully managed and not without reason. You immediately understood why I named my film agent Zelensky, didn't you?
Let's begin.
Speaker 1: You have had many film roles. Which one is your favorite? I would say that servant of the people is probably my favorite.
Speaker 0: The year is 2015. It's the premiere of the first season of serving the people series. According to the credits, the producer was Volodymyr Zelensky. In reality, he wasn't producing it by himself. Instead, his promotion had begun.
No wonder such a role became one of his favorites. Zelensky portrayed the character Vasily Golubarovkov, a school history teacher who becomes the president of Ukraine.
Speaker 2: I want to compare that situation to situation where, for example, you come into the plane, you're boarding, and you're taking your seat. And now you see the, man who look like a pilot, who dressed like a pilot, who speak like a pilot, greeting passengers, actor, who played a pilot in response for your life.
Speaker 0: Before the presidential elections, no one had seen a single press conference from the showman. Only interviews and videos were broadcast. Well, you understand, it makes possible to retake or rewrite a dumb answer. Almost all statements Zelensky made were on behalf of the cinematic president, Golovirovko.
Speaker 1: To all the people who want to quarrel with us, to divide our country, to separate us by color, by language, and so on, to all of you, I can't speak for myself as I am a person of culture. So let one of the characters familiar to everyone, Vasily Golubarovka, say it. And all the rest of you, villains, go to hell. In all this story, the Ukrainian population became the object of manipulation. The creation of the TV series servant of the people, in which he was prepared for his role, marked the beginning of imposing an image on people that he could be a potential head of state.
And after that, he ran for elections. It was an absolutely skillful manipulation.
Speaker 0: Now watch the hands. The final third season of servant of the people was released just 4 days before the first round of the presidential election. Vasili Golubarovskoe emerged victorious, became the head of the country, and transformed it into a powerful and prosperous nation. They are. This is the best pre election campaign in the history of mankind, and it worked.
In real life, on 21st April, Volodymyr Zelensky defeated Petro Poroshenko with over 70%, 73, 23% of the votes. Clearly, such a scenario was not created in Ukraine nor by Ukraine. Here, our compatriots are ahead of the entire planet.
Speaker 2: The role of Hollywood in Washington DC, it's is first of all, it's not a decision makers, but this is creators of idea, concepts. So if the idea flying well with the audience, you can repeat that idea in real life, in real politics, and it's gonna play. So this is similarity in that Servant of People TV series and a film of Kishorov produced and directed to head of state when it was a black president who come from a Democratic Party and serve the people.
Speaker 0: And if this works, why not replicate the scheme in the country close to Russia? And why not elect someone there based on the same principle? Someone who is unconditionally following orders.
Speaker 3: That is a a carefully prepared operation, by one of the intelligence services or all of the intelligence services in the United States and in NATO, to make sure that their guy is, in charge and will do what they tell him to do rather than somebody who has ideas of his own.
Speaker 0: A carefully prepared operation by one of the intelligence agency. What a revelation. Michael, thank you for this. It allows us to look at the following facts with an understanding of who is behind it. Let's figure out how and with whose help Washington started pushing actor and comedian Zelensky.
Speaker 1: Do we have any connection? Yes. Of course. Well, we have business relations. We are TV partners.
We all work for these. How many? 5 or 6 families?
Speaker 0: 5 or 6 families. Was I rewatching The Godfather just now? As if Zelensky is talking about the mafia, and it seems to be true. Igor Kholomoisky is a billionaire in an oligarch. Currently, he's under investigation by a US Federal Court for money laundering.
Back then, he was a figure of importance even across the ocean.
Speaker 1: In 2014, Kolomoisky becomes the uncrowned king of Ukraine. Not only the governor, not only the ruler of Ukrainovnafter and head of the bank that is much stronger than any state bank. He became the leading oligarch.
Speaker 0: 8 years ago, why was it decided to make Kolomoydsky the key player in the operation to bring Milolinski to power? In 2015, Petropurshchenko nationalized his main assets, such as the Yukonoftan company and later private bank. There's undoubtedly a personal vendetta at play. During the presidential elections, Kolomoisky was happy to criticize Poroshenko on his 1 plus one channel, and at the same time, to support Zelensky. Is it possible to say that it was Kolomoisky who brought Zelensky to power?
Definitely not. Mister Volodymyr has other puppeteers behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: Are you dependent on Igor Valeryvitch? And could it mean that after your victory in the presidential elections, Kolomoisky will rule Ukraine?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: I am a completely independent person. No offense, but a man who could control me hasn't yet been born.
Speaker 2: If Zelenskyy will be really on that rope of Kolomoyeskyy, I predict the private bank will be run by Kolomoyeskyy again, but it's not happened. So that's mean he has no obligation to do more. He just not putting him in a jail and that's enough for Kolomoyesky to be very thankful for him. After that, he will start playing the card as as his masters of puppet program.
Speaker 0: By the time Zelensky came to power, these puppeteers had already provided him with a financial cushion. It's doubtful that anyone remembered his earnings from the movies.
Speaker 1: Regarding Zelensky and his inner circle, it is also important to take into account all the manipulations and financial frauds that characterize this team. Firstly, Zelensky concealed some parts of his stakes in companies before the presidential elections. And then in particular, his mentor, Kolomoisky, used them for money laundering.
Speaker 0: Empty words, by no means. As I mentioned, we will operate with facts. In the fall of 2021, investigative journalists published the so called Pandora Papers. Nearly 12,000,000 confidential documents from financial companies in different countries were revealed, including offshore data on 35 world leaders. Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his partners from the cartel 95 studio were among them.
Ukrainian president indeed owned offshore companies, including the stake in Malteks Multicapital Corporation. Zelensky modestly omitted this information in his declaration. But most importantly, in 2012 to 2016, Kolemovsky transferred $41,000,000 to Zelensky's offshore company.
Speaker 1: He could be jailed in a normal country for such an offense.
Speaker 0: But this is Ukraine, and Zelensky is its president. And according to the offshore documents, he's a very wealthy president.
Speaker 1: Are you planning to use the state residences?
Speaker 2: Very bad.
Speaker 1: Guys, let some kids live in these residences. Like some vacation camps for people who really need it.
Speaker 0: In my opinion, it sounds cute, especially when you don't know about the residency. Ready to find out? Let's go. Firstly, a villain in Miami for himself worth $34,000,000. I've been to Florida and can understand the taste of the president of Ukraine.
Secondly, a house in Israel for his parents on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. It's worth $8,000,000. Europe, Zalewski prefers Italy. Tuscany, the best wines. By the way, one of the most expensive resorts in the country, Forte d'Almarbi.
Houses here are worth their waiting goal. In 2017, together with his wife, he bought a villa 600 meters from the sea. According to the declaration, it was worth about $3,800,000 at that time. Is that all? Not at all.
From the south, we moved north, not to Siberia, of course, but to London. Old center, legendary Baker Street, opposite the Sherlock Holmes Museum. There's another Zelensky residence, an apartment worth $3,000,000 Why? Probably the state will visit his owners with a report. More on that later.
Apparently, the real estate was purchased through the company of his business partner, Sergei Sheffer. That's why he's called Zelensky's personal wallet in Ukraine. I almost forgot about real estate. Georgia, not the state, the country. A new multistory apart hotel in the city of Batumi.
You might ask, Batumi? What is that? Well, take a look. It's also a seaside resort. Apartments are under renovation with an expensive finish, panoramic windows, and views in the city and the mountains.
Hint, it was built for well-to-do people. At least 5 apartments here belong to Zelensky. Finally, the settlement of Levadia, an elite residential complex emperor.
Speaker 1: Look. A magnificent view of Zelensky's house opens up. Here it is, a seashore over there.
Speaker 0: Lions, wide staircases, and columns. On the roof, there's a luxurious terrace, a pool, and a wonderful sea view. But guys, it's Crimea. Crimea, which is currently under Russian control. Zelensky made a mistake here, and the Russians were surely figure out how to use it to their advantage.
Zelensky's penthouse was purchased here in 2013, right before the so called Crimean spring. Nowadays, such a property could be worth about $1,000,000. However, a different amount is stated in his declaration. 1,384,000 Hibernia's were about $164,000. Well, we don't even need to mention the real estate in chief or the official residence of the head of the Republic in Concha Zaspa.
Even without those, it's quite a collection of villas, houses, and apartments. However, the Ukrainian president is in no rush to give them to children, at least not to other people's children. Unfortunately, we have to admit the obvious. Volodymyr Zelensky has always been stingy and greedy.
Speaker 1: When I saw this person running between tables and collecting tips, roughly speaking, making compliments with an ugly smile, right from that moment, he disgusted me. He was performing at events where the payment had already been made in advance. His group was paid in cash and still, he was running around collecting money from the tables. That looked it showed what he had initially been like.
Speaker 2: He was visiting Hollywood here in Los Angeles. He privately requested for meeting with and, like, you know, some kind of arrangements to meet and have a dinner with the famous Hollywood, stars like Leo DiCaprio or others. In private, not through the protocol. As a president, already sitting president who want a private dinner with a great star. This is, telling a lot about his greed, about his ego.
Speaker 0: Actors are forgiven for having villas worldwide and making big money. That's their personal business. There are questions for a president who presents himself as a man of the people and a fighter against corruption while hiding a dirty history of money laundering.
Speaker 1: These mythical Ukrainian roads are only built and repaired in someone's vivid imagination.
Speaker 0: The most ambitious project of the Ukrainian president turned out to be the biggest for the capital b embezzlement. In the spring of 2020, Zelensky promised to build and repair 6,500 kilometers of roads in Ukraine in a couple of years. In autumn, the prosecutor general's office of Ukraine discovered that a 129,000,000,000 went to the big construction project, though only a 127,000,000,000 were allocated from the country's budget. At first, I thought, maybe Zelensky wanted to build roads not only in his country, but maybe also in Poland. Nope.
Just 4,000 kilometer of roads cost a 120,000,000,000 of verniers. By comparison, in 2018, only 40,000,000,000 were spent on 3,800 kilometers of roads. So the cost per kilometer tripled. Meanwhile, the same companies won a significant part of the tenders. There was a lack of funds, but roads are sacred.
That's why 1,000,000,000 Hibernias from the COVID 19 fund were allocated to construction while thousands of Ukrainians were dying from the virus. Moreover, 62,000,000,000 Hibernias allocated for cancer treatment were also spent. Meanwhile, Ukraine ranked 2nd in Europe in terms of oncological diseases.
Speaker 1: I thought that the systemic corruption built by Poroshenko in Ukraine could not get any worse, but Zelensky surpassed him. There are no standards, no principles at all.
Speaker 0: In 2015, the Guardian named Ukraine the most corrupt country in Europe. You might say, that was before Zelensky. What about 2023? Well, nothing has changed. Zelensky continues to steal and deceive.
Do you remember his words?
Speaker 1: Our first task is a ceasefire in Donbas. I assure you, I'll do whatever it takes for our heroes to no longer die.
Speaker 0: I haven't heard a word about the civilians in Donbas, and I'm sure neither of you. Zelensky was speaking about the militants of the so called anti terrorist operation. At that time, Eastern Ukraine had been under shelling for 5 years, and that's why the words about peace were so eagerly awaited. I would like to remind you that in 2014, there's a coup d'etat called Maidan. Did it happen on its own without anyone's help?
I agree with you. There is no doubt. The opposition sees power with the support of various radical right wing movement. The eastern and southern regions of the country stood against the new illegal government, but the resistance was brutally suppressed. On May 2, 2014, Ukrainian nationalist burned 48 people alive in the trade union's house in Odessa.
At that time, Zelensky, a popular actor in Ukraine and Russia, had zero reaction. But the Odessa events became a point of no return for the country. Residents of Donbas decided to separate from Ukraine. In response, Kyiv declared its citizens as terrorists and launched an army against them. Over time, the civil war escalated into an armed conflict with Russia.
However, all of this was preceded by extensive preparation and support from the United States and Western countries.
Speaker 4: The United States has invested some $5,000,000,000 in Ukraine, since 1991 when it became an independent state again after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and that money has been spent on supporting the aspirations of the Ukrainian people to have a strong democratic government that represents their interest.
Speaker 0: As a result, destroyed cities, chaos, and the loss of life on both sides of the conflict. In our country, it's usual to blame everything on Russia. But what did president Volodymyr Zelensky do himself to prevent this horror? Firstly, he could have implemented the Minsk agreements. In September 2014, Russia, Ukraine, Germany, and France signed them.
One of the critical conditions for peace was granting special status to Donbas. December 2019, a joint conference following the Normandy format meeting.
Speaker 1: It is necessary, of course, to extend the agreement term on the special status of certain regions of Donbas and ultimately make this norm permanent.
Speaker 0: Here comes the moment for Zelensky to repay debt for wealth, for coming to power. Just look at it. He doesn't even hide his smirk during the speech of Russian president Vladimir Putin. Apparently, he already knew that the mess agreements were just a string, covering the preparations for a full scale war between Ukraine and Russia. As for Russia and Donbas, they were deceived from the very beginning.
Furthermore, both Zelensky and Petro Poroshenko were eager to join not only the European Union, but also NATO. And NATO secretary general Jan Stoltenberg has been promising to accept Ukraine for many years. Of course, this irritates and angers Russia. Who wants to have a constant military threat at their door step? As an American, I wouldn't be happy either.
For example, with Chinese military bases on the Mexican border. But Russia is different. Let's turn Ukraine against it, arm it to the tee, and sit it in the battle. US foreign policy expert James Jatres accurately assesses what is happening.
Speaker 5: Our policy, however, is to weaken and destroy Russia. Now for that purpose, yes, we are interested in Ukraine. Ukraine is a club we can beat the Russians with. It has nothing to do with Ukraine, nothing to do with Ukrainians who are simply expendable people as far as these governments are concerned.
Speaker 0: But it seems like the authorities of Ukraine don't really care. Besides, president Zelensky and his team are adding fuel to the fire.
Speaker 1: I am initiating consultations in the framework of the Budapest memorandum. If they aren't held again or their results don't guarantee security for our country Ukraine Ukraine will have every right to believe that the Budapest memorandum is not working, and all the package decisions of 1994 are being questioned.
Speaker 0: The Budapest memorandum is an agreement under which Ukraine gave up nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees. In 1994, it was signed by Russia, United States, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. Ukraine had to agree because it didn't have the money to maintain a nuclear arsenal. And recent history has shown that the world is very lucky it turned out that way. Even if
Speaker 1: we couldn't maintain them, we could reduce the nuclear capabilities instead, and we could use it to blackmail the entire world. And they would give us money for the maintenance.
Speaker 0: Imagine that, a nuclear power that blackmails the whole world demanding money. Would you like to have such a neighbor? I'm sure you wouldn't. No one would. The president of Ukraine practically declares his desire to regain nuclear weapons, and Russia initiates a special military operation.
To bring it to this point, Ukraine had to be made an enemy of Russia or anti Russian.
Speaker 1: The idea was to create a Nazi Ukraine because only a Nazi Ukraine could fight against Russia. Only the Nazis. Any other type would never fight against Russia, so they needed to build a Nazi Ukraine.
Speaker 2: Nazis to Ukraine.
Speaker 0: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine started saturating itself with nationalism. Yushchenko became the first Ukrainian president made by the west. Actually, not just a president. Even his personal life was America's achievement. I have to give credit to our system.
We know what an excellent work is. Take a look in the nineties. A high ranking employee of the US State Department, Katherine Chymachenko, a native of Chicago and the daughter of Ukrainian immigrants, came to Kiev for work. As a child, like many other children in the diaspora, she went through the scout camp. I'll tell you more about that later.
Then she became a member of the Neo Nazi Organization National Alliance.
Speaker 1: Initially, Yekaterina Chymoshenko sought a husband among the executives who could really leave Ukraine. So Chymachenko asked Yushchenko's assistant, Rybuchak, to put her near Yushchenko on a plane heading from Kyiv to Washington. 9 hours after the flight, he was absolutely in love, left his 2 children and wife, and went to Chymachenko as a banker.
Speaker 0: At that moment, the flywheel started spinning with new force. Zelensky, under careful dictation, completes the bloody plan. Yushchenko was the first to make nationalism and Russophobia the ideology of Ukraine at the state level. In 2006, he rehabilitated the nationalist Ukrainian organization, OUNUPA, which executed Poles and Jews during the 2nd World War. In 2010, he bestowed the titles of heroes of Ukraine upon fascist collaborators, Stepan Bandera and Roman Shukovich.
He even threatened to expel the Russian Black Sea Fleet from Crimea. Essentially, Lysenko severed ties with Russia, giving our country a blank check. Perhaps you'll ask me again if my imagination is playing tricks on me.
Speaker 1: At the time, one of the offices in the SBU building was allocated to CIA personnel. There were even anecdotal cases when the US ambassador, together with his entourage, handed out diplomas to the graduates of the SBU Academy. And there were the representatives of American intelligence agencies.
Speaker 0: In 2010, Yushchenko lost the election to Viktor Yanukovych. The new president stripped Bandera and Zhukovic of their hero titles and sought to restore relations with Russia. But turning Ukraine into an anti Russian state was only a matter of time. Let's dig a little deeper. A joint institute of the US and German ministries of defense.
Previously, they trained intelligence agents there. Since 1993, they have trained political elites and specialists from different countries to promote democracy. That's the official version.
Speaker 1: They were focused on searching for suitable agents. It means how to attract people to an active position, to confrontation. Of course, all security officials and military personnel were recruited through the Marshall Center.
Speaker 0: Graduates of the institute, ministers, ambassadors, parliamentarians, and advise, 14,000 significant people from a 157 countries, including Ukrainians. The program consists of lectures, seminars, internships at major universities in Western Europe and the United States, receptions, and museum visits. But the main thing is career advancement in their homeland. This is what Ukrainian political scientist, Andrey Mishin, could have obtained. In 1998, he worked at the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and was preparing an important agreement with Russia.
It was about military political cooperation.
Speaker 1: The west advised us in every possible way to remove this topic. Again, they insisted on the removal of dual citizenship between Russia and Ukraine. And deputy minister San Sanich Charlie said that the political adviser to the United States embassy in Ukraine wanted to meet with
Speaker 0: me. Adrian Myshyn only held the position of the second secretary. The political adviser was several ranks above him. This was unusual, but the conversation turned out even more bizarre.
Speaker 1: It all started with a strange question. Andrei, do you understand that Russia will soon disintegrate? How? He says, well, you see how they recruit, how they provoke you. There was Chechnya, and there will be another Chechnya.
Maybe Siberian Republic and Tardustan. You know, it's like a funnel. The same as how the Soviet Union collapsed. Everyone can be drawn into this funnel. That's why Ukraine should join NATO.
We are very interested in the young generation of politicians and security officials who could work with us.
Speaker 0: Later, Mishi was taken to Moldova, Switzerland, Italy, Georgia, and the United States on behalf of the Marshall Center. They gave lectures on international conflicts and military patriotic education for youth and provided them with analytical literature. In return, they required short reports, for example, on the sociopolitical situation in Ukraine and the preparation of lectures for American military personnel, special agents, and diplomats. All topics were related to Russia and the former Soviet republics. After the Maidan in 2014, the Marshall Center became a mecca for the highest ranking Ukrainian officials and military personnel.
Here's one of the letters from the Marshall Center addressed to the chairman of the security service of Ukraine, Valentin Nelievichhenko. It's an invitation to a seminar on the strategic development of Ukraine. Students are Ukrainian ministers and generals, instructors, representatives of intelligence agencies from the United States and the United Kingdom.
Speaker 1: I think 100% of high ranking Ukrainian officials, one way or another, have received training at this center. Essentially, they were training people with one task, to counteract the Russian Federation now or in the future solely for that purpose.
Speaker 0: One of the seasons of the TV series, Surrender the People, is dedicated to presidential elections. Candidate Gola Virodko hires a professional PR specialist, but later fires it, and along with a team of friends, developed and runs his election campaign. Did presidential candidate Zelensky do the same? Of course not. During the elections, his campaign headquarters secretly worked with the Washington lobbying agency, Signal Group Consulting.
The task was to arrange meetings between Zelensky, the Trump administration, and members of congress. Zelensky's headquarters denied this connection, but here you can see the documents, the service agreement, and signal groups report to the US Department of Justice stated that Zelensky paid them nearly $70,000. Quite affordable for a presidency, isn't it? Perhaps the actors spared money, or maybe they gave him a good discount on their PR services. However, Zelensky was eager to please the US and UK authorities.
Therefore, after the elections, the number of foreign PR agencies increased. Please meet Andrew Mack. Since November 2019, he has been an external adviser to the Zelensky. He's an American citizen and a descendant of Ukrainian immigrants. The director of the lobbying firm, SKD Knickerbocker, Stephen Kruppin, former speechwriter for president Barack Obama, now works for Zelensky.
Shai Franklin founded the lobbying firm, Your Global Strategy. It builds bridges between Ukrainian government and American mayors. It seems that one of these guys had a hand in quite a terrible idea. We are talking about a glamorous photo shoot amid hostilities. The main character of the photo session is the first lady of Ukraine, Olynya Zelenska, a desperate housewife alongside her brave hero husband.
Zelensky, as usual, looks unshaven and stern. His military style compliments his wife's luxurious outfits. Take note of how well she wears the $7,800 Louis Vuitton coat. The extras are wearing uniforms from the military brand 5 dot one one multicam. The average cost is about $8,000.
The very famous and expensive American photographer, Annie Leibovitz, did the photo shoot. In the past, she worked with John Lennon and Demi Moore. Her fee for a single working day is $75,000. It goes without saying the team of stylists, makeup artists, and journalists surely didn't work for free. Those who have forgotten during this time, innocent people are suffering and dying.
The country is devastated and heavily relied on foreign aid. Because of this, the photo session did not sit well with some Ukrainians and foreigners. Some even compared to Zelensky's photoshoot to the pictures of Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun. And all of this is part of the payment for Zelensky's hard work as an agent serving America and the British crown.
Speaker 1: We had a meeting at the Mi 6 office. Unfortunately, I can't disclose all the information. It's a matter of state affairs.
Speaker 0: Problem. Autumn 2020. Ukrainian media accidentally, or maybe not, learned about Zelensky's secret meeting with Richard Moore, the head of Mi 6, not just anywhere, but at the headquarters of British Intelligence Service. According to the president, the meeting was about protecting Ukraine's sovereignty.
Speaker 1: Yes. The meeting of Volodymyr Zelensky is something new because if we look at World War 2, the cold war, we have never had real meetings between the leader of a country in a state of war and a group of intelligence representatives.
Speaker 0: As a secret service agent, I'd like to tell you that there are special norms of decency and protocol. When a president of a sovereign country is on a foreign territory, he should meet with his counterpart. The only exception is if the head of intelligence himself comes to Ukraine to meet with Zelensky.
Speaker 1: Coming down to the lowest level, to the head of the intelligence agency is not a simple admission of guilt. At that time, the person becomes an actual professional agent. It is clear. One handler always works with one agent. In the case of Zelensky, the head of Mi 6, Richard Moore, became his direct handler.
Moore.
Speaker 0: Trust my experience. You can't just make someone work as an agent without a hook or substantial grounds. And if we carefully trace the events leading up to this remarkable meeting, we will find them. In the summer of 2020, British intelligence almost captured the internationally renowned Wagner PMC members. These Wagnerians took Makhmut, for example, Palmyra in Syria.
They significantly interfered in spreading British policy in Africa. It happened that the mercenaries slipped right under the nose in MI 6. Whether it's true or not, they say the operation failed due to the office of the president of Ukraine. Somebody called and warned them. Now no one will figure out if it was a mistake, a calculation, or foolishness.
That's why Richard Moore didn't bother investigating. They summoned Zelensky to show him his place and at the same time, to discuss the extent of his independence and freedom in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: They expect proposals about independent media from us. They are ready to finance them together with Ukraine to provide Ukraine with information that corresponds to the main issue. Protection of freedom and human rights, and above all, shield the information that defends our country.
Speaker 0: Everyone understands. The MI 6 office gave the president of Ukraine a precise directive. The thing is, after the Maidan in 2014, there are quite a lot of Ukrainian opposition media. Obviously, they were preventing the creation from an image of Russia as an enemy to Western countries. It was decided to end the dissenters with Zelensky's hands.
And to prevent the president from getting bored and to help him practice English, he was surrounded by British security. This was in the spring of 2022 in the midst of war. Mucha, look at these scenes. Do you see a patch on the sleeve of 1 of the guys near Zelensky?
Speaker 2: Oh, don't push The
Speaker 0: Ukrainian flag is upside down. A local would have been shot on the spot for this, but this guy is okay. You know why? He does as the right to. He's a foreigner like everyone else around Zelensky.
In fact, judging by their pronunciation, they're
Speaker 1: British. As we can see, Zelensky's security team consists of Brits. Quite marvelous because we have the so called 9th administration, the president's security, with 1,800 professional military guys, special forces, and combat swimmers.
Speaker 0: Well, not surprising. Firstly, UK intelligence services most likely helped Zelensky with the theatrical staging in Bucha. Secondly, the British follow every step of their agent, even during the meeting with the pope. Oh, this episode deserves special attention. It seemed to me like a meeting between a priest and a devil.
Judge for yourselves. Zelensky went to the Vatican in a black sweatshirt with the emblem of the UNO, Ukrainian Nationalist Organization. He gave the pope an icon with a black silhouette instead of Christ, which is outright satanism according to church chemist. He plopped into a chair before the host. For those unaware, this is a gross violation of etiquette, and he didn't pay much attention to pope Francis's peaceful initiatives.
Italians considered that route. I'm sure this whole comedy was a distraction. The The central communication of Zelensky took place not in the pope's office, but in the next room without the involvement of pope Francis, but with the participation of the minister of foreign affairs of the holy sea, archbishop Paul Richard Gallagher, a native Brit whose cardinals are conducting powerful propaganda in Ukraine. Ukrainian president spoke with Gallagher for almost an hour and a half, but the main detail is that the head of MI 6, Richard Moore, was also present at the meeting in the Vatican. Maybe this fact explains the record breaking motorcade of the leader of independent Ukraine over 20 cars.
Speaker 2: To be sure that that guy did not make a trick to make a suddenly make a peace with Vladimir Putin. They take hostages, his kids, and a wife in a Great Britain. This is another layer of security for masters of puppets.
Speaker 0: How is it possible to reprogram the whole country and its people against Russia? Is how is Ukraine paying back now? I'll tell you more in the next episode. We've just started.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky's presidency has involved several controversial tasks that have contributed to Ukraine's turmoil. He has enforced a ban on the Russian language, leading to the alienation of millions of Russian-speaking citizens. The church split was finalized, with the Orthodox Church of Ukraine established under Western influence, resulting in the persecution of the canonical church. Historical narratives have been rewritten, erasing connections to the past, while freedom of speech has been curtailed through the shutdown of opposition media and parties. Zelensky has also facilitated foreign control over Ukrainian land and transformed the country into a testing ground for military and biological experiments. As a result, Ukraine faces severe economic challenges and a high human cost due to ongoing conflict, raising questions about the future of its leadership and the sacrifices made by its citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Scott Ritter. In the first episode, I told you how Volodymyr Zelensky came to power, who he really is, and who recruited him. Everyone knows that agents are given tasks. Zelensky is no exception. However, in his case, it's more like obligations, debts that cannot be ignored, like a deal with the devil.
Over the course of 4 years of presidency, he's accomplished or brought to fruition at least an important task. Each of them, to varying degrees, has contributed to the destruction of Ukraine. Today, we'll examine all of them in detail. So task number 1, to eliminate the Russian language.
Speaker 1: If people in the east and Crimea want to speak Russian, let them. Leave them alone. Provide them with the opportunity to speak Russian on a legal basis. Language should never divide our home country.
Speaker 0: 2014, the words of this charming guy in a t shirt resonated with many people in Ukraine, not just Russians. There were also many Ukrainians who spoke Russian and feared its prohibition. There were reasons for these concerns. Immediately after the Maidan protests, the Verkhovna Rada decided to repeal the law on the principles of the state language policy. This law had been in effect since 2012 and granted regional status to the Russian language in areas where was the native language for at least 10% of the population.
The repeal of this law became one of the reasons for the succession of Crimea in the civil war in the Donbas region. In the meantime, Zelensky himself had always spoken Russian and, most importantly, had defended it for many years until he became the president. In 2020, Zelensky made all schools in Ukraine Ukrainian language only. In my home country, the United States, documents and websites are created in 2 languages, English and Spanish. There are many Spanish language schools, and no one forces them to switch to English.
This is fair and understandable. What's not understandable, why is English and not Russian the second language in Ukraine? Can you explain that to me? Are there many English Americans or Australians there?
Speaker 1: The greatest inconsistency in what Zelensky and the Kiev government say lies in the fact that after starting the civil war in 2014, while attempting to restrict and prohibit the use of the native language by the population of Donbas, they now say, we will unite all territories into one nation. However, what is happening in Donbas today is an attempt of the Western Ukrainians, Galatians, and those who are anti Russian to carry out ethnic cleansing. This presents a real problem, and this aspect is often silenced in the west.
Speaker 0: Not only is it being silenced out, the west also supports it, and Zelensky is happy to do his best. Since January 2021, the entire service sector in the country has been switched to Ukrainian. You know, Zelensky once named Ukraine the center and heart of Europe. It seems to me that he got it wrong with the organs. It is heartless to violate the rights of 12,500,000 of his own citizens.
In the summer of 2021, the constitutional court of the country upheld the law on the Ukrainian language. Violations of this law are subject to fives. How could one hate his own people so much as to punish them for their native language? But take a look at this video. President Zelensky is pretending hard and diligently that he has forgotten Russian.
Perhaps someone will tell him that this is a disgusting play that won't convince even a a child. Another obligation of such type to western handlers was task number 2, to finalize the church split.
Speaker 1: Suitcase. Train Suitcase. Train station.
Speaker 0: Russia. April of 2023. Siege in the Kyiv, Pytchevs, Lava. What you see is a result of a long and painstaking work of my fellow countrymen. December 2018, the Orthodox Church of Ukraine or OCU emerged in Ukraine with the support of Petro Poroshenko in the United States.
One might wonder why. Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarch already existed in the country, but, apparently, the term Moscow was a significant hindrance for the Ukrainian authorities to pray. That's why they created their own church with blackjack and their own tomos. In 2019, the OCU received a decree from the ecumenical patriarch of Constantinople, granting them autocephal, that is the independence from the Russian Orthodox Church.
Speaker 2: It formally remained part of the Russian Orthodox Church. Except for that formality, everything that Kyiv possibly could've asked for was granted by Moscow. The Tomos issued from Constantinople is a very different thing entirely. Supposed on the assembly, but under the control of Constantinople. That almost every detail of church life within the so called schismatic church must be approved by Patriarch Bartholomew, who, of course, himself is then under the control of the state department and the CIA.
Speaker 0: The head of the OCU, Seri Epifidis Domenico, started receiving frequent visits from American guests. In 2019, William Taylor charged the affairs to Ukraine, came to meet him. And in January 2020, former CIA director and US secretary of state Mike Pompeo Pompeo paid a visit. The purpose of this visit will be revealed by him a bit later.
Speaker 1: I made sure the US supported international recognition of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine. Help the Metropolitan escape Russian influence.
Speaker 0: Epiphanias awarded Mike Pompeo with a medal from this. Then there were meetings with Kurt Volker, the former US special ally for Ukraine. After that, there was a meeting with US secretary of state Antony Blinken. The meeting schedule resembled that of a foreign affairs minister. Americans used Zelensky to complete the division of Ukrainian Orthodox believers into the right and wrong factions.
The right ones attended the sanctuaries of the new church. While with the assistance of the Ukrainian authorities, they seized temples from the canonical church and expelled the priests. Finally, the situation escalated to the Kyiv Pytiersk Lavra. As far as I know, it is one of the most important and ancient orthodox shrines dating back over a 1000 years. Unfortunately, the key for Kyivskavra was under the administration of monks from the canonical Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate.
The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine decided it was heresy and terminated the lease agreement with the monastery. Security forces and nationalists besieged the walls in Volodymyr. Now the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church is under the threat of prohibition, and Volodymyr Zelensky continues to train his persuasive skills in his speeches.
Speaker 1: Today, another step has been taken to strengthen the spiritual independence of our state and protect our society from old and cynical Moscow manipulations with religion. Ukraine. Ukraine is a territory of the greatest religious freedom in our part of Europe.
Speaker 2: It's been very successful in creating, I would say, kind of a fake Ukrainian, artificial Ukrainian identity that is hostile to Russia, that defines itself in in in opposition to a Russian identity. It grew somewhat during the Soviet time, but really has taken advantage of the last period since 1991, since Ukraine became an independent state.
Speaker 0: In this substitution of Ukrainian's identity, common roots are being torn apart, and common shrines are being violated. The great victory over the Nazis in 1941, 1945 had always united this nation. Even Volodymyr Zelensky recalled it not long ago.
Speaker 1: You know, my grandfather, Semyon's brothers, and their families were killed by the Nazis. At that time, my grandfather was at the front. In the end, he endured the entire war and returned as a victor.
Speaker 0: Volodymyr Zelensky's grandfather, Semyon Ivanovich, commanded a mortar platoon during the great patriotic war. In Soviet Ukraine, people like Sinon Zelensky were glorified with monuments and memorial sites. However, under Volodymyr Zelensky, all of these monuments have been destroyed as it was in the 19 forties under Hitler. Rewriting history has become the 3rd task for Zelensky. Victory day on May 9th was replaced with Europe day by the president of Ukraine.
If he remains in power a little longer, I am certain that Ukraine's will start celebrating July 4th, the Independence Day of the United States together with us. I've witnessed how everything Russian is being canceled in the west with the start of the special operation. Flags, poets, artists, musicians, they've all been banned. I am convinced that this was a planned campaign. The same thing happened in Ukraine, and it became another tool of division.
Speaker 1: I want to remove Lenin and instead put someone who will be admired by everyone in the country. It's called literary characters. Definitely not politicians. What's stopping you? Ukrainian?
Ukrainian. If you want to rub it into your neighbor, put up Gogol.
Speaker 0: Gogol, Bulakov. Under president Zelensky, Bulkov was officially labeled as Russophobic, and his memorial plaque was removed from the wall of a university in Kyiv. Writer Nikolai Ostrovsky, who apparently came from Ukraine, didn't satisfy him either. Scientist Mikhail Lobonos, writer Maxim Gorky, and finally, Alexander Pushkin. The great writer was the one who offended Ukrainian authorities the most.
But what about freedom of speech and the media? It was precisely this issue that the head of I personally stand for freedom of speech, and you know that very well. I'm not sure if you're
Speaker 1: I personally stand for freedom of speech, and you know that very well. I will never in my life shut down any channels. I don't have the right. I don't have the authority.
Speaker 0: Just a year and a half later, with full belief in the circumstances presented, following the teachings of Stanislavski, he made the following statement.
Speaker 1: This trio of channels contain talking armies that deceived and brainwashed you very professionally.
Speaker 0: On February 3, 2021, 3 Ukrainian television channels, ZIK, News 1, and 112 Ukraine were shut down. The decision was made by the National Security and Defense Council under Zelensky's order, of course.
Speaker 1: There is currently no threat to freedom of speech or media business
Speaker 0: in Ukraine. I'll repeat those words. There is no threat to freedom of speech. This was set on the day when 3 television channels were shut down. A year later, Zelensky fulfilled another obligation.
Let's call it task number 5. He banned the opposition.
Speaker 1: What is it for? Certain political parties' activities are suspended at the time of martial law.
Speaker 0: On March 20, 2022, the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, under Zelensky's orders, banned 11 opposition parties. No one in Ukraine objected to the funeral of freedom of speech. Those who could have objected were either killed, arrested, or fled the country.
Speaker 1: We were told that under Zelensky, dollar would cost 45. There would be chaos in Ukraine. There would be war, but none of this happened.
Speaker 0: Zelensky is not much of a prophet. Although in 2019, there was no order on the organization of training for a battalion tactical group of the 4th operational brigade to carry out combat special tasks in the joint forces operation as part of the armed forces of the Ukrainian brigade. This is a secret document confirming Ukraine's preparation for an attack on Donbas in March 2022. Evidence can be found in other documents as well, including the new military strategy approved by Zelensky after the meeting at MI 6, which we discussed in the first episode.
Speaker 1: We see words from Oxford dictionary and a term existential threat never used before. Also, for the first time ever, we see in this document the use of population as a human shield. The document stated that Ukraine should prepare for active offensive actions to liberate Donbas. It was clear that the war till the last Ukrainian was being planned.
Speaker 0: As you can see, the provocation was successful. Russia struck a few days earlier than Ukraine, and Zelensky was taken aback in fright.
Speaker 1: On my way from the Kremlin, I called Zelensky and said, listen, I just came from a meeting. Putin has no intention of killing you. Zelensky asked, are you sure? I replied, 100% sure. 2 hours later, Zelensky returned to his office and recorded a video saying, I'm not afraid.
Everyone's in place. We're all working.
Speaker 0: President doesn't leave Kyiv and stays with the people. What an artist does? Perhaps he'll finally be awarded with an Oscar. After all, he tries his best, especially in this video.
Speaker 1: This is where I live. Is this the president's bed? Were you here on 24th? I was. Well, we also went down to the bomb shelter.
Speaker 0: Looking at a tiny room, one can't help but sympathize with the president. This poor guy lives and works in purely Spartan conditions.
Speaker 1: So this is where I live. Well, could you say this is your home? It's my home. I've lived here for a year.
Speaker 0: I also believed it. Alas, the head of Ukraine lied again.
Speaker 1: There is a well equipped bomb shelter on Bank of a Street. It was built during the Soviet era when the Soviet Union faced a real nuclear threat. These are long term facilities that allowed every member of the apparatus to function. Not just one individual. So there are no small rooms there, of course.
Well, anything can be staged.
Speaker 0: Who cares about the truth when everyone is watching the tragic comedy starring Zelensky? The first thing his PR team did after February 24, 2022 was a new image, the military style, as if the president had just returned from the front lines, the unshaven look, the sunken face due to sleepless nights of hard work. However, our colleges would argue all the signs of cocaine abuse are evident, constant nose sniffing, an inappropriate reaction, speeches solely from the prompter. A British specialist took precautions and created a hologram of the Ukrainian president.
Speaker 3: All of these technological possibilities can change public life.
Speaker 0: This addiction can be explained. It is quite common in the acting industry for which Zelensky comes from. Unfortunately, for the country, the Ukrainian president not only didn't quit, but apparently let himself go. It all began with weed.
Speaker 1: Medical marijuana, in my opinion, is normal. It is sold in small quantities, droplets.
Speaker 0: In 2020, Zelensky proposed legalizing cannabis in the country. At that time, his suggestion didn't go any further. However, everything changed when the war began. It's no secret that Ukrainian soldiers get stoned before going into battle, and wheat is the least harmful substance they consume on the front lines. Will they have someone to look up to in that regard?
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 0: This is very pleasing to American and British intelligence agencies. It would be a sin not to take advantage of a drug addicted president for their own purposes. He is completely manageable. I suppose the western handlers supply him with the purest drugs. It brings to mind the opium wars when England, in order to advance its interests, addicted almost the entire Chinese elite to drugs.
I cannot speak for all of Zelensky's inner circle, but he himself alone was enough to accomplish what would never work with a sober person. For example, turning the country into an experimental playground and convincing others that it would be great.
Speaker 5: We are interested in testing modern systems in the fight against, the enemy, and we are inviting arms manufacturers to test the new products here. So I think for our partners in Poland, in United States, France, or Germany, it's a good chance to test the equipment.
Speaker 0: The 6th goal Zelensky was tasked with was to turn Ukraine into a testing ground, not only for weapons, but also for experiments on people. In 2005, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency or DTRA was established in the country. It's a pet project of the US Department of Defense, and one of its tasks is to study biological threats, including deadly viruses and bacteria.
Speaker 1: Since 2005, the American side has been involved in modifying Ukrainian laboratories. Selecting and training personnel, and gradually advancing its interests, goals, and tasks in the research field. They are approaching the old Soviet developments. The collection of pathogens and strains in Ukraine remaining from the Soviet Union was estimated at $2,000,000,000 The American side did everything to obtain this collection.
Speaker 0: After the Maidan, the DTRA expanded its operations in Ukraine with the assistance of Milena Suprin, a US citizen and the daughter of Ukrainian immigrants. In Ukraine, she served as the acting minister of health. Suprin opened the doors of all bio laboratories in the country to Americans, and they've allowed to establish new ones. From that moment, mass experiments on Ukrainians, both civilians and military personnel, have begun. Then the documents of the DTRA, a new abbreviation appeared, UP, which stands for Ukrainian project.
Speaker 1: There were genetic samples collected in large quantities from 4,000 servicemen of the Ukrainian army from different regions of the country. North, south, west, east, including Kyiv, Odessa, Kharkiv, and Lviv. With 1,000 individuals in each city participating in this blood donation. This was part of the UP 8 project. Officially, it was presented with benevolent intentions.
Namely to determine human body resistance to specific pathogens depending on the region of the country.
Speaker 0: According to some reports, in January 2016, in Kharkiv, approximately 20 Ukrainian soldiers died within 2 days from a flu like virus. Another 200 soldiers were hospitalized.
Speaker 1: The intelligence of the Donetsk People's Republic has previously reported on research activities involving American military specialists. Research took place in a closed laboratory located in the village of. It is situated 30 kilometers from the city of Kharkiv. According to our information, the leakage of the California strain of deadly influenza occurred precisely from there.
Speaker 0: From this day onwards, Ukraine turned into a petri dish. Outbreaks of cholera, hepatitis, and botulism were recorded here. But what wouldn't you do for the sake of science, especially in a foreign country? Therefore, in 2020, DTRA spent another $80,000,000 on research in Ukraine.
Speaker 1: There wouldn't be an order from the US secretary of defense to carry out work on the development of genetically targeted biological weapons on Ukrainian territory. However, it was possible that they would write an order for research to be conducted on combating certain diseases like tularemia more effectively. That's what they would write, and this is what can be found in official documents.
Speaker 0: The Pentagon's plans were disrupted by Russia's special operation. Now the Russians could gain access to documents and bio materials. This alarmed the United States to such an extent that in March 2022, deputy secretary of state Victoria Nuland left the secret out in the senate.
Speaker 6: Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be seeking to, gain control of.
Speaker 0: Foreign specialists in the areas of plague, cholera, and hepatitis left Ukraine. Instead, the country was filled with soldiers of fortune. However, these guys have been welcome there since the days of the Maidan. This became President Zelensky's 7th commitment. 2015, the orbital operation was launched.
It was British training program for the Armed Forces of Ukraine conducted, of course, in accordance with NATO standards. In 2016, Ukraine and United States signed the concept of development of partnership between the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the Department of Defense of the United States for 5 years. The auto of 2017, American instructors discussed logistics and cooperation with the Nazi affiliated ASOG battalion. The following year, ASOG battalion was visited by Canadian military personnel as well.
Speaker 3: I think, the Ukrainian embassy here in Washington, in violation of the Geneva Conventions on diplomacy, recruited these people, recruited soldiers, recruited mercenaries, for their war against the Russian Federation. CIA is involved, perhaps not directly, but, and military intelligence, perhaps not directly. But they're there to advise, to con to give counsel, to make suggestions, to link people up and help with
Speaker 0: organization. A year ago, NATO secretary general Jan Stoltenberg stated that NATO had trained tens of thousands of Ukrainians.
Speaker 7: They have trained Ukrainian troops for years, so tens of thousands of Ukrainian troops, are now at the at the forefront of being trained also for several years being being trained by NATO, allies. They're now at the front fighting against the invading Russian, forces.
Speaker 0: In February 2022, hundreds of foreign mercenaries joined them. Among them was the communist and anti fascist John McIntyre, who served in the US military like myself. He arrived in Ukraine with the sole purpose of gathering evidence of crimes committed by the Armed Forces of Ukraine and sharing it with the world. Throughout this time, John risked his life as he could be exposed at any moment. A year later, he managed to escape to Russia.
Speaker 8: It's accurate if it's Stavki or Slovakia. I can never remember, but, I actually seen a church that was blown up. It was so sad to see. I mean, it was the most beautiful church I'd ever seen. They they said, oh, that's a Russian church.
Yeah. So this is the wrong kind of church because they speak the wrong kind of language. You know?
Speaker 0: John said that a mercenary in Ukraine earns around $1,350 per month. However, if a mercenary in Ukraine is involved in combat operations, he gets $3,500 a month. That kind of money, one can kill even unarmed people with impunity.
Speaker 8: There is 3 soldiers, Nazar Kuzmin, Rico Chavez, and Aurelio from, France. Basically, they took, I believe, 2 or 3 Russian POWs, and they put them in, like, a a trench in the position. And they shot them in the back
Speaker 0: In fact, there's been a long standing affinity between the United States and Ukrainian nationalists. It began immediately after World War 2 when the Americans took the fleeing accomplices of Bandera under their wing. 1948, the CIA launched a secret operation against the USSR. Later, it was given the code name aerodynamic.
Speaker 3: Frank Wissner senior, who was a, a CIA, officer in charge, he worked with people who had been given him by the US Army Counterintelligence Corps, Stepan Bandera and, Mikaela Lebed, who were, essentially Nazi collaborators and murderers, war criminals, etcetera. He put together with their assistance recruiting and training, Ukrainian dissidents to return to the Ukraine or to be taken out of the Ukraine, trained, and then sent back with weapons. And the intent was to divide the Ukraine from the then Soviet Union and make it into an independent country.
Speaker 0: The connection between Ukrainian nationalists and terrorists when the CIA could be exposed. This meant war with Soviet Union. Therefore, the intelligence agencies slightly modified their subversive activities.
Speaker 3: They, organized something called Prowog, which was a company in New York City that recruited dissidents and Neo Nazis and old Nazis from the Ukraine, to make radio broadcast, print newspapers, and pamphlets and things. In, I think, 1957, they had something like, $1200 of radio broadcast and, a 100,000 or so newspapers and magazines that they printed and distributed both in the United States and Canada and also into the Ukraine.
Speaker 0: At the same time, in Canada, a secret operation called red skid was launched. There is much less information available about it compared to the aerodynamic. The only known fact is that it also involved Ukrainian nationalists.
Speaker 3: They worked with the American intelligence services and with the British to bring a lot of, right wing, neo Nazis or old time Nazis, people who collaborated with Webbed and, Bandera, into Canada and created a tremendous organization called the, Ukrainian, Conference of Canada.
Speaker 0: Today, Canada is the 3rd country in terms of the number of Ukrainians. There are more Ukrainians than in my home. For comparison, Ukrainian diaspora in the United States amounts to around 1,000,000 people. While in Canada, it constitutes 1,300,000 people. They represent a significant political force.
And, of course, they lobby for the interest of Kyiv and the right wing radicals in the country. What surprised me is that the descendants of some nationalists are shaping Canada's policies today. For example, deputy prime minister and minister of finance, Chrystia Freeland. Her much loved grandfather, Mykhailo Komjak, worked as the editor in chief of a Nazi newspaper, Krakauer Snackrikken, Krakauer News, in Poland, historical figure of the 20th century. That's how this newspaper referred to Adolf Hitler.
Its readers were convinced that the population of Galatia was ready to fight and die for a holy and just cause designed by you know who. Undoubtedly, children are not responsible for the actions of their parents, but Freeland calls her grand father not a criminal, but a victim, a victim of the Soviet regime, of course. In 2016, Freeland paid tribute to her ancestor on Twitter. Turns out that her grandfather worked diligently to restore freedom and democracy to Ukraine by supporting Hitler and the holocaust, I suppose. Frelin herself made a contribution to the destruction of the USSR.
In the 19 eighties, she brought anti Soviet propaganda materials, money, and video and audio recording equipment to Soviet Ukraine for local nationalists. As a result, she was banned from entering the Soviet Union. Today in Russia, Freeland is also considered persona nongrab. However, in the west, her photo with a flag of the Ukrainian insurgent army, a terrorist organization, does not hinder her political career. It was Freeland, together with former prime minister of the United Kingdom Boris Johnson, who convinced Western European countries to quickly supply weapons to Ukraine.
In 2022, Canada provided Ukraine with $2,000,000,000 in direct financial assistance, an additional $500,000,000 through bonds, and over $2,500,000,000 for military and humanitarian aid. Moreover, in Canada, the United States, United Kingdom, and other countries, PLOST, which is an analog of Hitler Jugend, the Hitler Youth, operates freely, a youth organization of Ukrainian nationalists that during World War 2 trained militia for the OUN and SS Volunteer Division Galatia. It was established as early as 1911. Stepan Bandera and Roman Shukovich emerged from PloST. Among active members of this organization were also Canadian minister, Chrystia Freeland.
Members were present during the Maidan protests and later participated in the killings of residents in Donbas. In 2019, under pressure from the Ukrainian diaspora, Zelensky became the 1st president to officially recognize the class movement in Ukraine through legislation. It has now become the primary educational structure for young Ukrainians funded by the state. This is just one aspect of Zelensky's bloody agreement. Let's call it task number 8, the legalization of Nazism.
A few years ago, Neo Nazis caused outrage in Western media. However, today, Nazism and fascist insignia become a fashionable trend. Swastikas, SS symbols, and the Totankov skull become a norm. Even president Zelensky post photos of them on his social media accounts.
Speaker 8: It's, it's just kinda funny, like, the, it's funny to me, like, the links that the Ukrainian, media and the western media had to go to, like, hey, guys. Remove your swastikas for the camera. Like, we're trying to get a good shot here. You know? Your swastikas making us look bad.
You know? But some of them are open Nazis. Open Nazis. Yeah. I mean, like, there's numerous, evidence on the Internet of white people with swastika flags and stuff like that, tattoos, and throwing up the Hitler's salute, all that stuff.
I mean, it's
Speaker 0: In the middle of the last century, Hitler caused deaths of millions of innocent people. His ideology was rooted in hatred towards entire nations. Today, this ideology could be seen within the Ukrainian government and its army.
Speaker 8: Basically, you know, you have this culture of, like, Stefan Bandera and, like, oh, Hitler was good and so on and so forth. And I've asked him, like, okay. You know, you're fighting side by side by these Polish guys. You know? Like, you genocide, like, you know, a 100,000 Polish and Jewish.
You know? Why are you, not cystic? You know? And they say, oh, well, this was war. This was way back.
Like, no. This is genocide. Like, you know? So they basically denied this genocide even still to this day, you know.
Speaker 1: We often forget history too quickly in the west. I come from Brittany, and several mass killings during World War 2, whether in Oradur or in Brittany, were committed by Ukrainian forces serving in the Nazi German army. And yet, the west once again seems to believe that having Neo Nazis in Ukraine is acceptable while we fight them in the west. There is a clear inconsistency as if there
Speaker 0: were the good and the bad Nazis. So it turns out that the good Nazis are the ones who hate and kill Russians and fight against Russia.
Speaker 4: For these actions, the US and Western Europe seem to forgive all of their sins. So it turns out that the good Nazis are the ones who hate and kill
Speaker 0: Russians and fight against Russia. For these actions, the US and Western Europe seemed to forgive all of their sins.
Speaker 1: It was necessary to build a Nazi Ukraine. It was being built during Poroshenko's presidency, of course, But bringing it to a state of a military conflict required, so to speak, shaping its population structure and preparing the population for war. And for that, a Jew was the best fit because it provided a colossal excuse. What Nazism, so to speak, could exist with a Jewish president? Where are you from?
Where are you from? Tell me, where are you from? He fainted.
Speaker 0: As I have discovered, Zelensky himself is not against the Nazis and the atrocities committed by the Azov battalion.
Speaker 9: Azov was one of those many battalions. They are what
Speaker 0: they are.
Speaker 9: They were defending our country. And later, I want to explain to you. Everything, from, all the components of those volunteer battalions later, were, incorporated into the the military of Ukraine.
Speaker 0: Most likely, you haven't heard about it. The TV channel cut out the journalist's question in Zelensky's response. A Jewish president should not respond to such a matter about those who rob and kill unarmed people. We remember the main thing is the picture. Western partners even overlook the fact that the president of Ukraine and his associates rob their own army and the supplied weapons.
They want to offset the expenses through Ukrainian land. This is agent Zelensky's 9th task. Fertile lands represented interest even for him. Ukrainian constitution even has a a separate article dedicated to Black Earth or Chernozil.
Speaker 1: Even during my time there, in the central office, I heard that the same Monsanto Corporation set its sights on the entire south of Ukraine, from Odessa to Mariupol. During the conflict, it seemed to me that over 30% of major Dutch corporations were present there. Land was actively sold to companies like Cargill
Speaker 9: Cargill.
Speaker 1: And other global corporations that were operating in the region.
Speaker 0: For example, Cargill's revenue in 2020 2 amounted to a $165,000,000,000. The GDP of Ukraine as a whole in 2021 before the war amounted to approximately $200,000,000,000 Until 2021, there was a moratorium on the sale of land in Ukraine. It was extended 10 times during that period, and land was leased out. However, Zelensky urgently needed loan. The IMF offered money in exchange for lifting the moratorium.
Ukrainians were afraid that foreigners would start buying up land. November 2019, the president, perhaps still in the role of the righteous screen character, Goluborodkov, hurried to reassure the people.
Speaker 1: Foreigners and companies with foreign founders will be able to purchase Ukrainian land only if the consent of the Ukrainian people is granted through an all Ukrainian referendum.
Speaker 0: Referendum. Spoiler. There was no referendum. In July 2021, the moratorium on the sale of land was lifted. Yes.
Foreigners do not have a formal right to buy land, but there is a loophole. Technically, Ukrainian companies under foreign control can make purchases.
Speaker 1: In our country, this is called a straw man. It exists everywhere in the world where local residents can protect themselves to some extent. In such cases, a fictitious person, a straw man, is employed, and you act as you please. In
Speaker 0: February 2018, the Institute of Agricultural Economics assessed Ukrainian land. It turned out to be inexpensive. $2,500 per hectare was the maximum price, but that's the upper limit. The majority are willing to buy land for $1,000, and here's how much agricultural land costs in my home country. So we're in 2018, black soil.
Now let's assess arable land in Western Europe, same year, 2018. So Ukrainian land is inexpensive. It is nearly 13 times cheaper than the most expensive land, which is in Italy. That's why there is high demand for it among Europeans. It makes sense for them to invest in agriculture in Ukraine since they have limited access to journalism.
But why should we be concerned about it? Land in America is fine.
Speaker 1: This oil is located in Europe, not in the US. If it is removed from the food cycle, Europe will have much less chance of being self sufficient and acting independently. And that's why there is a plan to reduce Europe's food security in order to better control neighboring countries. The US doesn't need the grain, but they need control. And control comes only when you control food security of other countries.
And Ukraine was a very, very successful project from the perspective of the US.
Speaker 0: I would say that Ukraine remains a very successful project for the United States. These are not just agricultural corporations that are making money. In 2022, the investment firm BlackRock offered to help Ukraine rebuild its economy. Of course, this refers to the future prospects. At BlackRock, we see The BlackRock company has the
Speaker 1: extent of their assets and the influence they have, both on German and Ukrainian politics. In May 2023,
Speaker 0: Zelensky signed an agreement with BlackRock. Last September, the cost of reconstruction and economic recovery of the country was estimated at nearly 350,000,000,000 dollars. However, later Kyiv increased the expenses to $1,000,000,000,000. After Zelensky's agreement with BlackRock, people started writing on Twitter that Ukraine was becoming privatized and sold to funds. And, you know, it seems to be true.
Speaker 9: BlackRock in
Speaker 1: BlackRock doesn't invest in recovery. Instead, it builds dependencies and spheres of influence through reconstruction. Politics, army, and economy form a 3 headed dragon currently running the world.
Speaker 0: I'm not sure about the entire world, but Ukraine will definitely be working for BlackRock and similar companies for the next 300 years. And at the same time, for the governments of United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. From 2014 to 2021, America allocated over $2,500,000,000 to Ukraine. These are the findings of the Akhil Institute for the World Economy, a German research institute. Since the beginning of 2022, United States have been the leader in terms of military aid provided to Ukraine.
From January 2022 to January 2023, Kyiv received over $46,000,000,000 for military purposes. Yes. We spent less on the war in Afghanistan. $43,000,000,000 over a little more than 9 years. United Kingdom doesn't spare any expense also.
In 2022, they transferred nearly $3,000,000,000 to Kyiv, and they plan to spend the same amount in 2023. Over the course of the year, NATO countries have provided Ukraine with approximately $120,000,000,000 in assistance.
Speaker 1: I may turn out to be a bad prophet, but I am confident that as soon as peace is established in Ukraine the flow of dollars and credits will stop. And instead, we will be grabbed by the throat on all fronts demanding the repayment of these debts. Nobody will care that Ukraine is currently incapable of repaying its debts. It simply cannot. Its debts now exceed our gross domestic product significantly.
Speaker 0: In May 2022, Biden signed the lend lease law. This means that Ukraine started receiving weapons and equipment on credit, just like the Soviet Union, United Kingdom during World War 2. Agreeing to this plunder became commitment number 10 for Zelensky in this deal with the dep. The president of Ukraine called it a historic step. I would call it a leap into the abyss.
Do you know when Russia repaid its debt to the US for lend lease in 2,006? It took them over 60 years to repay the debt. Ukraine already owes the European Union a $132,000,000,000, which is 90% of its GDP. Even freezing payments will not allow the economy to settle its debts on time. Meanwhile, the country is experiencing rampant inflation.
Food prices have risen by 26.5%. The poverty rate has jumped from 5.5% to 24%, percent affecting over 7,000,000 people. The country has lost 1 fifth of its territory. And most importantly, 100 of thousands of lives have been lost.
Speaker 2: Iran is a peace candidate. He turned around and betrayed that. And what's always astounded to me is that how he manages to keep so many regular Ukrainian boys going into this war to get themselves killed, in in a war that they simply cannot win. And they yet they keep going. Just just in Bakhmut, by the way, the Ukrainians lost more men than the United States lost in the entire Vietnam War.
Speaker 0: So the rights of millions of citizens have been trampled upon. Ukrainian men are being sent to the front lines to be slaughtered like sacrificial lambs, snatched right off the streets. The Russian language and culture have been practically eradicated. The canonical church is on the verge of being outlawed. The country has been turned into a safari for foreign mercenaries and a testing ground for bloody experiments.
Agent Volodymyr Zelensky has accomplished the tasks assigned by foreign intelligence agencies. The question is, will those in power still need someone who knows too much and wants too much?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UK is seen as irresponsible, echoing the attitudes of the 19th-century British Empire and causing global tensions. Recent comments by President Macron are also viewed as reckless. Zelensky is perceived as a threat because he seems to be pushing for a full-scale war between NATO and Russia. The belief is that if the conflict remains between Ukraine and Russia, Ukraine will ultimately lose. Zelensky's actions appear aimed at drawing NATO into a broader conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I personally find the UK utterly irresponsible in general, because, they talk like the 19th century British Empire, and get everyone else into hotter water as a result of that. France's remarks of President Macron's remarks that is in recent weeks have been highly irresponsible. Zelensky is a danger to the world in my view because, of course, what what does Zelensky want? He wants a full fledged war between NATO and Russia because if it's a war between Ukraine and Russia, Ukraine loses. So he's trying to pull NATO into a full war.
reSee.it AI Summary
The mainstream media is hiding the truth about Zelensky. I came across a brilliant video titled "Zelensky Unmasked," which reveals his carefully crafted image and the PR machinery behind it. The episode portrays him as a criminal who has shut down churches, dragged Christian men to their deaths, and is linked to corrupt oligarchs. It also mentions that he has suspended elections. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs warns that Zelensky poses a danger to the world.
@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW THIS MUST WATCH! Brilliant Video ‼️ "The King is Naked" #ViewFromAbroad ACTOR is a First-Class Crook and Liar "Zelensky Unmasked": the second episode focuses on Zelenksy’s carefully crafted image and the PR-machine responsible for it. Zelensky is a criminal. He's shut down churches. Dragging Christian men with crosses around their neck to their death. Corrupt oligarch. Suspended elections. Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: Zelensky is a danger to the world.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Zelensky's rise to power is not as straightforward as it seems. Initially a comedian and actor, he was backed by influential oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who played a significant role in shaping his presidential campaign. Zelensky's portrayal as a heroic leader has been meticulously crafted by mainstream media, despite his failure to fulfill promises of reform and peace in Ukraine. Under his administration, corruption persists, and dissent is suppressed. While he is celebrated in the West, the reality in Ukraine is grim, with rising authoritarianism and significant loss of life due to ongoing conflict. Zelensky's leadership raises questions about who truly controls Ukraine, suggesting he may be a puppet in a larger geopolitical game. The investigation into his true role continues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vladimir Zelensky isn't quite who he's portrayed to be. Even if you believe that he is a righteous servant of democracy, one thing is without a doubt. He is an actor in more ways than one. But he's not an actor who simply became president. He had backing.
What virtually no American knows about Zelensky is that he appears to be backed by shadowy billionaires accountable to no one other than their own business interests. Zelensky's image isn't something that just happened. It appears to be carefully coordinated and orchestrated. Zelensky as a leader is being portrayed by the dominant mainstream media as a noble saint, selfless, brave, chic even. A hero to woke actors and warmongering politicians alike, Zelensky is the world's biggest celebrity, and he's being billed as something more.
He is the new George Washington, the new Winston Churchill. So what's the truth? I'm Ben Swan, and this is Zelensky Unmasked.
Speaker 1: And who is Zelensky? I mean, this is a guy that used to play the piano with his penis when he was a comedian playing the president of
Speaker 2: the Ukraine. The history of Zelensky is interesting, and it's exactly what you would expect for a person who, is acting as the president of a country right now. He was in a TV show, a servant of the people, and he was a comedian. And in that TV show, he was a teacher who became president. And he wanted the country to join NATO and join the EU and all of the things that, you know, he's acting as now.
So then his financial backers then started a party, and they called that party the servant of the people party. And they ran him as president with exactly the same platform that he had in the television show.
Speaker 0: Vladimir Zelensky didn't just become president of Ukraine. Not surprisingly, he had help. What mainstream media won't tell you is where that help came from. A name you've probably never heard. Igor Kolomoisky is one of Ukraine's leading oligarchs, and he's the owner of the 1 plus 1 media group, one of Ukraine's largest media conglomerates.
Kolomoisky's network aired Zelensky's hit TV show, Servant of the People, the one that made him a star. Kolomoisky also has been accused of being one of the most notorious gangsters in Ukrainian history. He's accused of embezzling 1,000,000,000 of dollars and of hiring people to kill his rivals. That aside, Ukraine's worst kept secret is that Kolomoydsky was pulling the strings of Zelensky's presidential campaign. And even though he's Jewish, US government officials claim that Kolomoydsky was the brainchild and bank roller of Ukraine's neo Nazi Azov battalion.
Soon after Zelensky's servant of the people party was launched, Kolomoisky got the attention of the FBI. The US justice department claims that his Pribot Bank ran a Ponzi scheme, which stole 1,000,000,000 from investors enormous power he wielded, which was needed to complete Zelensky's transformation from TV personality to his country's top man.
Speaker 3: The show is so popular, and Ukrainian presidents were so bad that they took him, ran him, and he beat the people not because he's qualified, but because they were so sick of the old system. You do.
Speaker 2: What did I mention? It had nothing but left for the
Speaker 3: They thought this actor could pretend to be president better than presidents were actually being president.
Speaker 2: So clearly, it was a production to create a television show and then eventually turn it into a party, but they knew that the people of Ukraine wanted peace as most people in most countries want.
Speaker 4: But they knew at least he's promised to end the war. That's what we are hoping for.
Speaker 2: So he ran as a peace candidate, and he ran arguing that he would push for peace with Russia, peace with the Donbas, etcetera, and he won. Of course, when he won, unfortunately, he did a complete, political reversal, and he went in the direction that his backers wanted.
Speaker 0: Zelensky took office in 2019 amidst the catastrophic collapse of public confidence in Ukraine's government and frustration with that society's endemic corruption. Hope quickly turned to despair, however, once it became clear that under Zelensky, nothing had changed. The economy remained in channels. Corruption was still rampant, and the Donbas war still raged on. Zelensky had failed to live up to any of his promises.
Speaker 3: The war comes, and they take this man with 23% popularity who shut down all democracy, and we turn him into Winston Churchill.
Speaker 0: And pretty soon, Zelensky was everywhere on the cover of Time, Newsweek, Wired, Vanity Fair. He was even photographed for vote. You can't make this stuff up. He and his wife posed for cover photos while he was in the midst of leading a war, supposedly for his country's survival. Really?
And he had time for this. Actually, he had time for this and a lot more. The actor turned president also made his way to the US stage by recording messages, which were played live at the Grammys and the Golden Globes. He rang the bell at Wall Street virtually, and he visited congress live and in person. A weird sand statue of him was erected in Estonia, and congressman Joe Wilson, a republican from South Carolina, introduced a bill to erect a permanent bust of Zelensky at the US Capitol.
By the way, you can now purchase a miniature version of this would be bust on Amazon for 1999.
Speaker 4: He was selected to act in this role, and he's doing a fantastic job as an actor. Quite frankly, this is the role of a lifetime, and he's killing it.
Speaker 0: And it's clear that Zelensky got a lot of help in prepping for this role.
Speaker 5: So, basically, today, the Ukraine is run by the deep state, the the military in in in Washington, the people who want war to make money from war, the in in the military industrial complex in United States, and Zelensky is a puppet within this whole big show.
Speaker 2: It was from the very beginning, this was some kind of a in my opinion, it was some kind of an intelligence pushed, media operation to this day. And that's why he's always behind green screens. That's always why he's doing covers for various magazines, etcetera, because this is really a production for people worldwide to think that they have a president of a country, and he's just a hollow figure.
Speaker 0: Here's something you're not gonna see on CNN. Throughout history, intelligence agencies have invested massive amounts of money to manage public relations campaigns. That's just a fact. These campaigns have been waged to spread disinformation in the interest of getting public opinion behind a war. And you don't have to look very far back in the past to find examples.
I'll give you one right here. 1990, a girl from Kuwait who said her name was Nayira, testified that she witnessed babies being taken out of incubators and killed by Saddam Hussein's forces. Turned out, that was a lie. And the girl wasn't just some random girl. She was the daughter of Kuwait's ambassador to the United States, Saud Al Sabah.
The story about the incubators, by the way, it never happened, but it was too late. Once we knew for sure, the publicity campaign associated with that lie swayed public opinion against Saddam Hussein and in favor of a US invasion of Kuwait. 12 years later, US secretary of state Colin Powell took his turn at lying with an eye towards Iraq. Remember this famous shot of him holding up vials of those biological weapon samples? He testified before the world that the country had weapons of mass destruction.
This bold faced lie prompted the US invasion of Iraq and the deaths of over 1,000,000 Iraqi people. So the question that thinking people must grapple with, could the same thing be happening in the case of Ukraine?
Speaker 2: It's interesting because for the most part, that, that production has been successful. He's been pushed as a, you know, a hero of democracy and this poor kind of the, you know, the small democratic free country has been attacked by a brutal and angry emotional person, not a country. It's it's the the traditional Marvel Comics hero villain scenario. He's a hero. He's a good guy, stands for everything good, and he's attacked by the equivalent of Lex Luther in a Superman movie, which would be Vladimir the evil Vladimir Putin.
And they've been, you know, pretty successful with with that in the United States simply because that's the only story that's allowed to get out.
Speaker 0: The reality of things in Ukraine are much more grim. Under Zelensky's watch, the Russian language has come under attack as has the orthodox church. Alternative media outlets have been banned as have opposition political parties. Zelensky's cult like status in the west is masking the rising tide of authoritarianism in Ukraine. And not just that, it appears that even Zelensky is starting to believe his own hype.
Speaker 3: Now he actually believes he's a man of gravitas, that he is Winston Churchill.
Speaker 0: Like the original Churchill, Zelensky isn't necessarily all about peace either, even though the PR machine that surrounds him tells us that he is. As numerous military analysts have asked, what's the endgame here? There's much agreement that long term, Ukraine doesn't really have much of a chance in this war. So why is there no effort toward peace?
Speaker 3: 10 years from now, when they write the history of this conflict, he's gonna be the most reviled man in the world because he is responsible for the deaths of 100 of 1000 of Ukrainians. Yeah. Hundreds of thousands of people he swore to protect, he slaughtered. For what? Because he's addicted to weapons infused ego driven narcissism.
Speaker 6: Ukraine is becoming a nation of widows and orphans. There's 300,000 dead Ukrainians. Douglas McGregor would say 350,000. Alright. I'll go on the conservative side there and 30,000 Russians.
I don't know. They say the figures tend to want. Whatever it is. Let's say 400,000, 500,000, all we got. Whatever it is, it all could have been avoided.
This all and you know what? Nobody in DC that's connected, whether it be Raytheon, Victoria Nuland, Joe Biden, Lloyd Austin. They don't give a rat's ass about any of those Ukrainian debts at all.
Speaker 2: Zelensky is part of a pattern right now throughout the US empire where you put an actor in place who appears to be making decisions, but he's not. So he's just another one of many, and they bring him out, and he does what he's told.
Speaker 0: If Zelensky just does what he's told, that would mean he's a hollow leader. It also means somebody else is pulling the strings. Who is it that appears to be telling Zelensky what to do, what to think, what to say? Who is really running Ukraine? We'll investigate as we continue to unmask Zelensky.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Zelensky is a Communist. That's why the Democrats love him. Listen to this: https://t.co/mvpIpHdD2W
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've banned another political opposition party that questioned my legitimacy, using the Department of Justice to seize their assets. This follows my 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, as well as taking control of Ukraine's largest television networks.
My presidential term ended on May 20th, but I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. Some may say this is acceptable because we are at war. But, consider the implications if we accept this rationale. Leaders in other countries may use the same excuse to suspend constitutions and cancel elections, especially considering the conflicts with Russia and China.
They are already conditioning people to accept a dictatorship by using the Department of Justice to target political opponents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here is something that the political establishment and propaganda media don't want you to know. Ukraine's President Zelensky has just banned yet another political opposition party, one that questioned his legitimacy as president, and used Ukraine's Department Of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members' assets. Now this is just the latest of Zelenskyy's actions to do this sort of thing. He began banning major political opposition parties in 2022 when he also started banning TV channels that were associated with his political opponents. And he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks, now controlled by their government.
Zelensky's presidential term ended on May 20. He canceled elections in the name of martial law, suspending Ukraine's constitution so he could stay in power. Defenders of Zelensky will say, hey, Ukraine is in the middle of a war. They can't have elections. Just stop for a moment and think, if we accept that excuse or criteria for suspending the constitution and canceling elections, then we should presume that leaders in our own country and our own establishment media will also use the same excuse and rationale when they suspend our constitution and our elections, since we too are at war with Russia and China.
If you think this sounds crazy, look at what's already going on. They've already started conditioning us to accept a dictatorship by rationalizing their own use of our Department of Justice to target President Trump and other political enemies in their efforts to stay in power.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe President Trump is correct in labeling Zelenskyy as a dictator, especially given the lack of elections in Ukraine. I'm frustrated about the $350 billion we've sent to Ukraine and question where that money has gone. The recent security agreement between Biden and Zelenskyy, committing us to support Ukraine for the next decade, raises concerns. I feel strongly that American politicians who support foreign interests are betraying our country, and I want our money back.
@Huberton - AJ Huber
President Trump is 100% RIGHT, Zelenskyy is a dictator. Where is all the $350 Billion money we've given to Ukrainians? Flashback: Traitor Joe Biden and Zelensky signed a new security agreement committing the US to financially support Ukraine for the next 10 years. Flashback: Warmonger dictator Zelenskyy Calls for the Creation of an ‘Army of Europe’ at the Munich Security Conference.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I truly believe the time has come for Europe to have its own military. The Armed Forces of Europe must be created. This isn't harder than standing firm against Russian attacks, which we've already done. It's not just about increasing defense spending as a GDP ratio. Money is needed, of course. But money alone won't stop an enemy assault. People and weapons don't come free, but it's not just about budgets. It's about people realizing they need to defend their own home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have talked about Europe that needs its own military, an army, an army of Europe. And I And I I really I really believe that time has come. The Armed Forces of Europe must be created. This is this is this is not harder than standing firm against Russian attacks as we have already done. But this is not just about increasing defense spending as a GDP ratio.
Money is needed, of course. Yes. But money alone will not stop an enemy assault. People and weapons don't come for free. But, again, it's not just about budgets.
It's about people realizing they need to defend their own own home.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've given a lot of money, potentially $350 billion, to address this issue. To ensure fairness, we need to equalize our contributions with Europe, as they've given a smaller percentage, around $100 billion, compared to our $300 billion plus. It is more important for them because they are closer to the conflict, while we have an ocean separating us.
However, there's a lack of transparency regarding where this money is going. Despite giving hundreds of billions, I haven't seen any accounting of it. I want peace because I don't want to see any more people killed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that we gave him. Well, we gave them, I believe, $350,000,000,000 but let's say it's something less than that, but it's, it's a lot. And we have to equalize with Europe because Europe has given us a given a very much smaller percentage than that. I think Europe has given a hundred billion and we've given, let's say, 300 plus, and it's more important for them than it is for us. We have an ocean in between, and they don't.
But where is all the money that's been given? Where is it going? And nobody I've never seen an accounting of it. We give hundreds of billions of dollars. I have I don't see any accounting.
So I want to see peace. Look, You know why I want? Because I don't want all these people killed anymore. I'm looking at people that
@Huberton - AJ Huber
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
JD Vance and Trump just put Zelensky in his place. Wow. Watch this. https://t.co/zndgjKEPKz
Video Transcript AI Summary
With all due respect, it's disrespectful to come to the Oval Office and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of my country. You're forcing conscripts to the front lines because of manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict.
During war, everyone has problems. Even you, but you have a nice ocean. You're in a bad position now and you don't have the cards. With us, you start having cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people and with World War Three. What you're doing is disrespectful to this country. I've said thank you many times, even today. I ask that you offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who's trying to save your country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country. Yes. But if you unknow Mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conflict.
Speaker 1: Have you ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?
Speaker 0: I have been to You come once. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems What? Bringing people into your military?
Speaker 1: And do
Speaker 0: you think that it's respectful
Speaker 1: I will answer. To come to the Oval Office of
Speaker 0: The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country? A lot
Speaker 1: of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future.
God bless.
Speaker 2: You don't know that.
Speaker 1: God bless. God bless. You will not have war.
Speaker 2: Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel.
Speaker 1: I'm not telling you.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying you're in no position to dictate that. Remember this.
Speaker 1: I'm You're
Speaker 2: in no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good.
Speaker 1: Will feel influence.
Speaker 2: We're gonna feel very good and very strong.
Speaker 1: You will feel influence.
Speaker 2: You're right now not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself to
Speaker 1: be in a very bad position, and
Speaker 2: he happens to be right about it.
Speaker 1: From the very beginning of the war You're not in a good position. I was
Speaker 2: You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards.
Speaker 1: Playing cards.
Speaker 2: Right now, you don't yeah. You're playing cards. You're
Speaker 1: playing I'm very
Speaker 2: a seat belt. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people.
Speaker 1: You think
Speaker 2: You're gambling with World War three.
Speaker 1: What do you think?
Speaker 2: You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country. I'm with back to more than a lot of people said Awareness. They should have.
Speaker 0: Have you said thank you once?
Speaker 1: A lot of times. No. Even today. You said thank you. Even today.
Speaker 0: You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country.
@PWestoff - Paul Weston
Zelensky is being brutalised in public by Trump and Vance here. He really doesn't have a clue. All the lies we have been told about Ukraine winning over the last three years finally exposed for all to see. And Zelensky does not like it one teensy bit. https://t.co/iv2i8tgZWw
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm staying strong in my country from the beginning of the war, even though we've been alone. I am thankful, and I said thanks in the cabinet. We gave you $350 billion. If you didn't have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks, maybe less.
Say thank you. It's important for the American people to see what's going on. You have to be thankful; you don't have the cards. You're running low on soldiers.
If you can get a ceasefire right now, take it so the bullets stop flying. Obama gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins to take out all those tanks. You gotta be more thankful because without us, you don't have any cards.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even today
Speaker 1: If you went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for
Speaker 2: the opposition in October, offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and
Speaker 0: the president who's trying to save your country. Please, you think that if you will speak very loudly about the war in He's not speaking loudly. He's not speaking loudly. Your country is in big trouble.
Speaker 3: I help you? No. No. You've done a lot of talking. Your country is in big trouble.
I know.
Speaker 0: You're not winning. You're not winning this. I
Speaker 3: You have a damn good chance of coming out okay because
Speaker 0: of that. Mister president, we are staying in our country, staying strong from the very beginning of the war. We've been alone, and we are thankful. I said thanks in this cabinet. In order to in this cabinet.
Speaker 4: We gave you I said stupid president three hundred
Speaker 0: and fifty billion dollars. You voted for your military You voted for for You your
Speaker 3: you didn't
Speaker 0: have our military equipment
Speaker 3: You invited me to have our military equipment, this war would have been over in two weeks. In three days.
Speaker 0: I heard it from Putin. In three days. This is something Maybe less. In two weeks. Of course, yeah.
Speaker 3: It's gonna be a very hard thing to do business like this.
Speaker 0: It's gonna take you. Say thank you. I said a lot of times here
Speaker 2: except American people. That there are disagreements, and let's go litigate those disagreements rather than trying to fight it out in the American media when you're wrong. We know you're wrong.
Speaker 3: But you see, I think it's good for the American people to see what's going on. I understand. I think it's very important. That's why I kept this story so long. You have to be thankful.
You don't have the cards. You're buried there. You you have people in dying.
Speaker 0: You're running low on soldiers. Don't listen.
Speaker 3: You're running low on soldiers. It would be a damn
Speaker 0: good news. Then you can then you tell us, I
Speaker 5: don't wanna cease fire. I don't want a cease fire. I wanna go, and I want this.
Speaker 3: I look. If you can get a cease fire right now, I tell you, you take it so the bullets stop flying and your men stop
Speaker 0: forcing you. Of course, we want to stop person. That was your that was your president. It was your president. Excuse me.
Speaker 3: That was with Obama who gave you sheets, and I gave you javelins. Yes. I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks. Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins.
You gotta be more thankful because let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us, you have the cards. But without us, you don't have any cards. One question to my
@LibertyLockPod - Clint Russell
I like how Trump treats Zelensky like he would a retarded nephew https://t.co/BB4zIMAX9I
Video Transcript AI Summary
I see you're all dressed up! I suppose I had to dress up too. How are you doing? You're all dressed up today. Thank you very much.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't even know if you're all dressed up. I guess I had to Pretty close. How are you? Shut up. He's all dressed up today.
Thank you very much.
@MrReaganUSA - Mr Reagan 🇺🇸
What is Zelensky thinking? Donald Trump is the best negotiator of any president in history, maybe of any world leader in history. You want him on your side too negotiate. Zelensky acts like Trump is the enemy. What do you think Zelensky wants? https://t.co/og50sqvNPh
Video Transcript AI Summary
With all due respect, it's disrespectful to come to the Oval Office and try to argue in front of the American media. You're forcing conscripts to the front lines due to manpower issues, and you should be thanking the president for trying to resolve this conflict.
During war, everyone faces problems, even you. But you don't know that, God bless. Don't dictate what we're going to feel. We're trying to solve a problem. We're going to feel very good and very strong.
You're in a bad position and don't hold the cards right now. You're gambling with the lives of millions and risking World War Three. What you're doing is very disrespectful to this country, which has shown you far more respect than most said they should have. Have you even said thank you once, even today? You campaigned for the opposition; offer some appreciation for the U.S. and the president trying to save your country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm talking about the kind of diplomacy that's gonna end the destruction of your country.
Speaker 1: Yes. But if you
Speaker 0: unknow Mister president, with respect, I think it's disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media. Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for trying to bring it into this conflict.
Speaker 1: Ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?
Speaker 0: I have been to The Kangwans. I have actually I've actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour, mister president. Are do you disagree that you've had problems What? Bringing people into your military?
Speaker 1: We have problems.
Speaker 0: And do you think that it's respectful to come to the Oval Office of The United States Of America and attack the administration that is trying to trying to prevent the destruction of your country?
Speaker 1: A lot of a lot of questions. Let's start from the beginning. Sure. First of all, during the war, everybody has problems. Even you, but you have nice ocean and don't feel now, but you will feel it in the future.
Speaker 2: God bless. You don't know that.
Speaker 1: God bless.
Speaker 2: You don't
Speaker 1: know God bless.
Speaker 2: You will not have war. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're gonna feel.
Speaker 1: I'm not telling you
Speaker 2: about what we're to dictate that. Remember this. I'm not dictating in no position to dictate what we're gonna feel. We're gonna feel very good. Will feel influence.
We're gonna feel very good and very strong.
Speaker 1: You will feel influence.
Speaker 2: You're right now not in a very good position. You've allowed yourself
Speaker 1: to be in a very bad position, and
Speaker 2: he happens to be right about it.
Speaker 1: The very beginning of the war You're
Speaker 2: not in a good position. I was You don't have the cards right now. With us, you start having cards. Cards. Right now, you don't yeah.
You're playing cards. Piece of bread. You're playing cards. You're gambling with the lives of millions of people.
Speaker 1: You're thinking
Speaker 2: You're gambling with World War three.
Speaker 1: What do
Speaker 2: think You're gambling with World War three. And what you're doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country. I'm with all respect to you. Far more than a lot of people said they should
Speaker 1: have. Have you said thank you once? A lot of times. No. Even today.
You said thank you. Even today.
Speaker 0: You went Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October. Offer some words of appreciation for The United States Of America and the president who's trying to save your country.
@scrowder - Steven Crowder
My thoughts on Zelensky https://t.co/zSKOxsg0KR
Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't stand Putin, but Zelenskyy rubs me the wrong way too. The idea that support from the U.S. is never-ending is a pervasive problem with entities like NATO, the UN, Europe, and Canada. Without the U.S., Ukraine would be Russia. These modern comforts are supported by the U.S. and our military, which emboldens people like Putin. There's no winning without the U.S., so don't be a jerk in the Oval Office. Zelenskyy always wants a photo op, walks around like cartoon Steve Jobs, and is probably working on a book deal. He says they've been alone since day one, which isn't true. They've received hundreds of billions of dollars, largely from the U.S. A little gratitude would be nice when you visit our Oval Office.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just watched the exchange with, Zelensky and, president Trump. Vance, I don't think I've ever seen a thing
Speaker 1: like that. Have you? No. Not in public. No.
Not in public. Look. Here's the thing. Okay. And people wanna act like you're either Ukraine or you're you're you're you're Russia or Putin.
I can't stand Putin. Do I think he's former KGB yet? Do I think he's a totalitarian yet? Do I think he's interested in freedom? Absolutely not.
Don't like the way that he went into Ukraine. I think he'll take anything he can get. Alright? But Zelenskyy is more indicative of the pervasive problem that we're dealing with, whether it's NATO, whether it's the UN, whether it's the rest of Europe, whether it's Canada. This idea that it's a never ending supply of support from The United States, wow, you bitch about it.
This has to start with some semblance of truth. Okay? Without The United States, guess what? You're Russia, Ukraine. That was the law of the land.
That's what happened. Stronger nations conquered weaker nations. All of these these modern comforts that people take for granted, they're entirely supported by The United States and our military. Not a nation in Europe, certainly not Ukraine, certainly not Canada. And that is the mindset that emboldens people like Putin because they know at a certain point that well runs dry.
Does that make sense? Does that make someone pro Russia to acknowledge there's no winning here and there's certainly no winning without The United States? And if you accept those truths, probably not a good idea to walk into the Oval Office and be a dick. Here's how you know he's not being honest, Zelensky. First off, everything is a photo.
He rubs me the wrong way. K? Can't stand Putin. Got it? Zelensky rubs me the wrong way.
Why? Because he's walking around in the same outfit like his cartoon Steve Jobs, and he's working for a book deal after this. None of it seems genuine. And he sits and he says, we have been we have been thronged since day one, and we have been alone. They haven't been thronged since day one.
They've been getting this has been a shellacking, and everyone has been with them since day one. None of those statements are honest. How many how many Ukraine flags on x on Instagram? How many hundreds of billions of dollars largely from The United States and other nations for you to say, oh, maybe you haven't been alone. Please, thank you.
These are the words that people might like to hear when you come to our motherfucking Oval Office.
@BehizyTweets - George
Zelenskyy has lost his mind. He is posting on 𝕏 almost every minute right now, thanking every other world leader for their support. HE IS SO TRIGGERED! https://t.co/IqaJE7LEBi
@_johnnymaga - johnny maga
Zelensky’s full 22 minute interview on Bret Baier. He doesn’t apologize to Trump or the American people once, mentions Putin and Russia a hundred times and talks about all the destruction that he refuses to end. https://t.co/WabKZQLMHS
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm grateful for the ongoing American support during these tough times, especially from President Trump and Congress. We need to be united against Putin and end this war. I respect President Trump and the American people, and I believe open dialogue is crucial. Signing the minerals deal is a step towards security guarantees, but it's not enough. I wanted to share my thoughts with the President. A public spat isn't good for anyone. We want peace, but it must be just and lasting, with strong negotiation power, a strong army, and security guarantees. I came to the US seeking peace and security guarantees. It will be difficult to hold off Russia without continued US support. I am ready for diplomacy with Russians, Europeans and the United States for peace. Only the Ukrainian people can decide my resignation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are pleased to welcome back to special report Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky. Mister president, thank you for the time today, especially on this day to continue to do this interview. President Trump said after your meeting that you disrespected him and the vice president and all of America in the Oval Office. Do you think you did, and do you think you owe an apology to president Trump?
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. First of all, thank you for invitation, for this dialogue, and good evening to all your country, to all Americans. I'm very thankful to to Americans for all your support. You did a lot. I'm thankful to president Trump and to congress by partisan support, and I was always very thankful from all our people.
You helped us a lot from the very beginning during three years of full scale innovation. You helped us to survive. And and it anyway, we are strategic partners. And even in such tough dialogue, and I think it's we have to be very honest, and we have to be very direct to understand each other because it's very for us, very necessary to president Trump. And I'm I'm I'm with all the respect that he wants to finish this war, but not nobody wants to finish more than we because we in Ukraine, we are in this war.
We are in this battle and battle for for freedom for our lives. So so I'm just telling that, I think, that we have to be on the same side, and I hope that the president on our side together with us, and and that is very important to stop Putin. And I heard from president Trump a lot of times that he will stop the war, and I hope he will, and and we need to pressure him with Europe, with all the partners. And I think this dialogue had to be a little bit earlier to understand where we are. Like, you know, I don't remember exactly, but like president Reagan said that peace is not just an absent the war.
Yes. We are speaking about just and lasting peace, about freedom, about justice, about human rights. And that's why I said that I think so, that ceasefire, and you know Putin, he broken 25 times, Ceasefire during all these years, 10
Speaker 0: So I'm not hearing from you, mister president, a thought that you owe the president an apology.
Speaker 1: No. I respect president, and I respect American people. And if, I don't know if I think that we have to be very open and very honest, and I'm not sure that we did something bad. I think maybe sometimes some some some things we have to discuss out of out of media with all respect to democracy and to a free media, but there are things that where we have to understand the position of Ukraine and Ukrainians. And I think that is the most important thing.
Yes. We are partners. You know? We are very close partners. We have to be fair.
We have to be we have to be very free.
Speaker 0: I'm told that you were told multiple times from lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the White House to make today about the minerals deal and the economic deal, and then get it signed and let negotiations play out over security guarantees step by step. Is that true?
Speaker 1: I said that we have to sign this document, and we are ready for this. And this will be the step first step to security guarantees, but it's not enough. I think so. Maybe I don't know something. I don't know some details.
That's why I wanted to share it with the president, my thoughts, and to hear him again because he has a plan how to stop Putin. And maybe, as I said, maybe it's out of big conversations, but we have to share it. You know? This is so sensitive. You know?
Just cease fire without security guarantee. This is so sensitive for our people. I'm I'm speaking like a president of a people who are in this struggle three years, and they just want to hear that America on our side and that America will stay with us, not with Russians, with us. That's it. But I'm sure that it will be this is the first step to security guarantees.
Europeans, we don't need to lose them. They are good allies for The United States. United States is the most or the biggest of support and of peace, but we don't need to lose Europe, and they also want to know next steps. We have to be very open to understand how to stop the war.
Speaker 0: Right. But do you think the public spat in the Oval Office in front of the media served Ukrainians well today?
Speaker 1: I I think this kind of this kind of spat is is I mean, this, we have I mean, this is is not good for both sides anyway. And, I will I we're open, but I can't, you know, change our Ukrainian attitude to Russian. And I don't want they kill us for us. You know? This is very, clear that Americans are the best of our friends.
Europeans are the best of our friends, and Putin with Russian their enemies. And it doesn't mean that we don't want peace. We just want to recognize the reality, the real situation.
Speaker 0: President Trump is convinced that you will never sign a deal with Vladimir Putin. Is he right?
Speaker 1: No. I think so. What I think, Ukraine wants peace, and we will have. We will have anyway diplomacy. We will have negotiations.
I only said that I think so. It's about just and lasting peace. It's meant that we have be we have to be very strong at the table of negotiations. And at these negotiations, Ukraine and Russia like sides of this war have to be and United States and Europe. That what I said.
So we are ready for peace, but we have to be in strong position. What does it mean? Just to know that our army is strong, that our partners with us, and that we have security guarantees. Am I not right?
Speaker 0: Leaving the White House today, president Trump said this.
Speaker 2: He's looking to go on and fight, fight, fight. He wants to come back right now, but I can't do that.
Speaker 0: What do you make of that? Do you wanna continue fighting? Do you want peace? And if he had the opportunity to go back to the White House right now, would you do it?
Speaker 1: No. First of all, we want peace. That's why I'm in The United States. That's why I visited president Trump. And thanks for invitation again.
The deal on minerals is the first step to security guarantees. It's meant for the peace, closer to peace. That's why I'm here. And I have we have tough situation to understand it is to be in Ukraine. You you saw it, Brett.
You were swans. Thank you again. So I think that's very important to understand what's going on. But I I respect my soldiers and our people, our civilians who work and support our warriors. I can't say just stop.
Nobody will stop because everybody afraid that Putin will come back tomorrow. We want just and lasting peace. It's true. We want security guarantees. We raised this topic about NATO the quickest way, but not all the countries are on this side.
I said, okay. If not NATO, nobody is pushing. If not NATO, let's build NATO in Ukraine. That's my position. Europeans are ready ought to have contingents on our territory, boots on the ground.
United States thinks maybe to help, maybe USA backstop have to be just to guarantee that they are with Europeans. Look at your Europe. It's strong. It became stronger, but they also want to have allies like The United States. That's what I said.
I just want to understand what the peace. It's not my question, Brad. This is the question from all our people.
Speaker 0: You mentioned when I traveled to the front lines with you last year Yeah. To see the situation, to mark the anniversary of the war, and this is what you told me back then.
Speaker 1: Will Ukrainians survive without congress support? Of course, but not all of us. It will be a tragedy for all of us, not only for Ukraine, not only for Ukrainians, for all Europe.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So the question today is, can Ukraine win this war or hold off Russia without continued US support?
Speaker 1: It will be difficult for us. That's why I'm I'm here. That's why we speak about the future negotiations. It will be difficult without your support, but we can't lose our values, our people. We can't lose our freedom.
So a lot of people Russians came to our territory. You know it. Russians came to our houses, and everybody know, everybody saw it, video, images, lot of things. They killed so many people. Just to forget it, just to say that Putin is a great guy, no, without us.
We don't want it. That's why that's why we speak about, you know, everybody remembered how it was the first days of the war, how they came. Nobody wants in Ukraine. Yes. Of course.
Nobody will forget it, but nobody wants to have again new wave of occupation. That's why when we say, no, NATO, what security guarantees can we have? I'm not pushing. We are not pressuring. We're just asking.
We are just sharing very clear messages to our friends, to Americans. Right. If you are if you stay with us, thank you so much. But let's do let's do the infrastructure of security guarantees. Let's just share with our people.
Just with our people that America stay with us. That's great. We count on it. But just to share it and to say it, that's all.
Speaker 0: How does the war end? How do you get to a deal? You're at a a place right now where there is no deal. How do you get it back on track?
Speaker 1: I think that Europe is ready for contingence and to help us with financing of big army, such big as we have now. This is our army as a part of security guarantees. Now we want to just to find the place for our biggest strategic partner for The United States or United States will propose the where and how United States will give us security guarantees, what kind of and what part of volume of security guarantees. And when we will be ready with this, we will come to diplomacy. To diplomacy, yes, with Russians, Europeans, United States, and we, for a WAS.
I think this is real way because with weapon, it's too long. It's not enough. We don't have enough weapon to push them out, and we don't see now. For now, we don't see really big, volume of new support from The United States, but with all respect again. So for today, we'll be ready with security guarantee.
Really, when I say NATO, it's not about that we I mean, this we are focusing on this war. It's about very understandable infrastructure of security guarantees. And you see that no NATO countries for today, no NATO countries been under attacks.
Speaker 0: Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina, he has been a big proponent of you and of Ukraine, said this today after the meeting.
Speaker 3: I have never been more proud of the president. I was very proud of JD Vance standing up for our country. We want to be helpful. What I saw in the Oval Office was disrespectful, and I don't know if we can ever do business with Zelensky again. He either needs to resign and send somebody over that we can do business with, or he needs to change.
Speaker 0: So he says you need to continue, consider resigning. Is that on the table?
Speaker 1: I I don't know if he will be happy after my words. This decision can do only people of Ukraine.
Speaker 0: You're not gonna step down to do a peace deal?
Speaker 1: No. No. I I was
Speaker 0: I was
Speaker 1: I I was was all always ready. I I'm not I'm not sure that is a good idea for, for I mean, this such proposals. But, but, anyway, I always said, if United States will support NATO, so I think that is enough for Ukraine. So I think we I did all I all I had to do. And if somebody is not, I mean, this happy with me, okay.
Okay. But between us, yes, Americans vote for American president. Each European country vote for their president and only Ukraine. And with all respect to Lindsey, if I can say Lindsey, we know each other. Yes.
And only Ukrainians.
Speaker 0: Democrats have had
Speaker 1: for their president.
Speaker 0: Democrats have had the opposite reaction to the Oval Office meeting. Democratic senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut posted this. What just happened in the Oval Office was a planned ambush designed to help a brutal Russian dictator and hurt America's security. Trump has become Putin's lapdog, and America's global power is hemorrhaging as America sides with dictators over democracy. What an embarrassment.
Do you think the confrontation in the Oval Office today was preplanned, like senator Murphy suggests?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: You don't know? You think maybe?
Speaker 1: I don't know. No. No. No. I don't I mean, this I don't know about it.
I'm I think no. I think I think it was just really tough situation because we've been very open, very direct.
Speaker 0: What set you off? What made you mad? Because they said your tenor and tone sets
Speaker 1: It's not about mad. It's not Brad, you you see, how how to say? When you are in The United States. And for example, president or vice president or somebody or senators, it doesn't matter. Big politicians.
Yes? When they, for example, say that Ukraine is almost destroyed, that our soldiers run away, that they are not heroes, that Ukraine lost million of civilians, that his president is dictator. You know? What is the reaction? It's not about me.
The reaction is that where is our friendship between Ukraine and United States. That's it this is filling, and that's why I do not want to lose our great partners at The United States. And I I just said that it's not the first time. I said it by phone, and we had some other conversations, and we had in Munich meetings, and they said I said, please please be correct. Just I want to be very polite.
I I mean this, be correct with this number. When you say about the number, each person is important. When you say about a million of losses, we don't have any million of losses. When you speak about the territories, maybe some territories and etcetera, it's not just territories, it's houses. It's people lives.
You know? Their their their fathers, mothers, their relatives, grandfathers, died or this I mean, during this war. Nobody want to forgive Putin. It's not funny, you know, or or fairy tale. This is real life.
That's what I said. And when you said it, a lot of times, to my big friends, we've been here, today in our dialogue. And then they again begin to repeat the same things. I think it's not I mean this I I that's why I said it's it's not good way between partners, good partners and friends. That's it.
And I think that if, Jordan is asking questions to president with all respect to vice president, I mean, this he has his interview. This is Shouldn't this our diet.
Speaker 0: Shouldn't this dynamic, if you're going to be like this, be behind closed doors? Not Of course. Enough. So do you regret that? Are you regretting that that happened today?
Regretting?
Speaker 1: Yes. I think it was not good. Think it was not good because we had a lot of different dialogues. I'm not I'm always open to media, but there are very sensitive things. I just want to be honest, and I just want our partners to understand the situation correctly, and and I want to understand everything correctly.
That's that's about us.
Speaker 2: What
Speaker 1: Not to lose our friendship.
Speaker 0: A couple more things.
Speaker 2: What
Speaker 0: are the next steps in your mind? Here we are today. Yeah. What are the next steps?
Speaker 1: I think I think so. I think so. United States wanted this deal very much. And we've been not against this deal, but we wanted to understand what parts in security guarantees will take this deal and what next steps. Just again to understand for our people.
During the war, what you don't like, even sometimes hate, surprises. It's understandable. Many terrible things this war brought to us. So we don't we don't want any surprises. Yes.
That's why we want to be very fair with our partners. And I think this deal, it was prepared by teams. It was not simple during weeks. And now it's ready. I think that they have to sign.
The countries have to sign. The ministers have to sign. That's it. I don't know when they will do it. It depends on the American side exactly.
Speaker 0: The minerals deal did not have security guarantees listed in it.
Speaker 1: It's a part.
Speaker 0: The security guarantees?
Speaker 1: Is this is the part in the infrastructure of security guarantees because, for example, president Trump shared that I think so that if we will be there in some productions and etcetera in mineral that Putin will never, come on this territory where we are. And I said to him, don't trust Putin. Why? I said, because it's not I mean this, I we respect and we believe in strongest of The United States, but I said to him that we had more than two more than, 20 companies, American companies, big companies on the territory of Ukraine. And we had offices even on temporary occupied territories.
For Putin, it doesn't matter. It's American, Euro, European company, or Ukraine. It doesn't matter. He just came and occupied it. That's what I said.
I think this is great idea how to strengthen Ukraine and how to make business between two countries, how to make additional jobs for two countries, but it's not just these will not save
Speaker 0: us. I read what the Democratic senator said that Yeah. Trump has become Putin's lapdog. Do you agree with that president Trump is too close to Vladimir Putin in your mind?
Speaker 1: We spoke about it. And, I think today, very openly, president Trump, he said that I want to be in the middle. Otherwise, I will not put these guys at the table.
Speaker 0: And is he right?
Speaker 1: I want really I want to be very honest. I want really him to be more at our side. I will explain why. Because it's not just that the war began somewhere between our countries. The war began when Russia brought this war to our country, and they are not right.
And they are not right. They didn't respect our territorial integrity. They brought the war on our territory to our family. Sorry. For repeating to our houses.
And they're not right. And, of course, all the Ukrainians want to hear strong position of The United States on our side. From one side, it's understandable. From another side, he wants to find some way of dialogue with Putin, but he always said as I remember, he always said that peace through strength. And that's why I think that he's strong.
United States strong. Two parties together in this question. Two parties always together against Russia. You're very strong to to do strong steps against Putin.
Speaker 0: Americans are worried about where the money has gone. Yeah. Will there be a very rigorous accounting of where the money has gone? It seems like there is some question about whether there's corruption or sold military equipment. No.
Speaker 1: It's it's can't be so. 100 billions we have got during three years.
Speaker 0: Hundred and eighty three from The US.
Speaker 1: Now on on the paper, in the documents, yes. But we have in fact, because 67 came like a weapon. It came through the border. It's checked and it's fixed by ever everybody and we can we go we shared it not once with with the American side and one point five. It was direct financial support to the budget.
Again, it's very open. It digitalized. It's open, free, and please. If if somebody want to check it again, we are very, open with this.
Speaker 0: Last last thing, mister president. Yeah. Do you think your relationship with Donald Trump, president Trump after today can be salvaged?
Speaker 1: It can be. Yes. Of course. Because it's relations more than to president. It's the historical relations, strong relations between our people.
And that's why I always began with to thank your people from our people. And this is the most important. And of course, thankful to president and of course to congress, but first of all to your people. Your people help to save our people. People, the first.
Human rights, the first. This is very, important and we are thankful and sorry for this. I mean this. We wanted very much to have all its strong relations, and I very count that we will have it.
Speaker 0: Mister president, we're honored that you kept this interview. Thank you very much for the time.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. Thank you.
Speaker 0: When we come back, we'll bring in our panel.
@bertalanzoli - The world is patriots.🇺🇸🇷🇺
The famous celebrities who are fans of the dictator Zelensky https://t.co/Y6kZwrNsEI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a list of American actors who support Ukraine: Mila Jovovich, Sean Penn, Angelina Jolie, Jessica Chastain, Ben Stiller, Liev Schneider, Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Brad Pitt, Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Tom Hanks, Jake Gyllenhaal, Margot Robbie, Tom Hardy, Emily Blunt, Christian Bale, Zendaya, Timothy Chalome, Gal Gadot, Dwayne Johnson, Jennifer Lawrence, Matt Damon, Reese Witherspoon, Will Smith, Halle Berry, George Clooney, Nicole Kidman, Johnny Depp, Kristen Stewart, Eddie Redmayne, Suresha Ronan, Ryan Gosling, Rachel McAdams, Chris Evans, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, Tessa Thompson, Henry Cavill, Anya Taylor Joy, Jason Momoa, Natalie Dormer, Andrew Garfield, Florence Pugh, Idris Elba, Biola Davis, Chewatel Ejiofor, Lupita Nyong'o, Michael B. Jordan, Chadwick Boseman, Brie Larson, Tom Holland, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Evangeline Lilly, Kit Harrington, Emilia Clarke, Sophie Turner, Maisie Williams, Richard Madden, Gwendolyn Christie, Nikolay Coster Waldo, Lina Heedy, Peter Dinklage, John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill, Samuel L. Jackson, Don Cheadle, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jeremy Renner, Chris Pratt, Zoe Kravitz, Robert Pattinson, Colin Farrell, Killian Murphy, Barry Kjogan, Paul Mesquel, Daniel Day Lewis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American Actors Who Support Ukraine. Mila Jovovich, Sean Penn, Angelina Jolie, Jessica Chastain, Ben Stiller, Liev Schneider, Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Brad Pitt, Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Chris Hemsworth, Hugh Jackman, Anne Hathaway, Tom Hanks, Jake Gyllenhaal, Margot Robbie, Tom Hardy, Emily Blunt, Christian Bale, Zendaya, Timothy Chalome, Gal Gadot, Dwayne Johnson, Jennifer Lawrence, Matt Damon, Reese Witherspoon, Will Smith, Halle Berry, George Clooney, Nicole Kidman, Johnny Depp, Kristen Stewart, Eddie Redmayne, Suresha Ronan, Ryan Gosling, Rachel McAdams, Chris Evans, Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Rudd, Tessa Thompson, Henry Cavill, Anya Taylor Joy, Jason Momoa, Natalie Dormer, Andrew Garfield, Florence Pugh, Idris Elba, Biola Davis, Chewatel Ejiofor, Lupita Nyong'o, Michael B. Jordan, Chadwick Boseman, Brie Larson, Tom Holland, Anthony Mackie, Sebastian Stan, Evangeline Lilly, Kit Harrington, Emilia Clarke, Sophie Turner, Maisie Williams,
Speaker 1: Richard Madden, Gwendolyn Christie, Nikolay Coster Waldo, Lina Heedy, Peter Dinklage, John Boyega, Daisy Ridley, Adam Driver, Oscar Isaac, Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, Mark Hamill, Samuel L. Jackson, Don Cheadle, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jeremy Renner, Chris Pratt, Zoe Kravitz, Robert Pattinson, Colin Farrell, Killian Murphy, Barry Kjogan, Paul Mesquel,
Speaker 0: Daniel Day Lewis.
@ricwe123 - Richard
Did you know USAID paid Time magazine $4 million to name Volodymyr Zelensky "Person of the Year"? Now you do...... https://t.co/H7HfWYoIWa
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since Trump administration started its work, Department of Government Efficiency has discovered huge amounts of money wasted by the government. In 2022, USAID paid Time Magazine for million dollars for them to award Ukrainian President Zelenskyy the title of the person of the year. In 2024, Politico newspaper received over $8,000,000 from USAID. According to Wikileaks, USAID was funding over 6,200 journalists across seven zero seven media outlets and two seventy nine media NGOs. Trump claimed that billions of dollars were spent by the USAID and other government agencies on supporting Democrats and their agenda. Trump administration believes that such waste of money is detrimental to The US and that USAID needs to be reformed or shut down entirely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since Trump administration started its work, Department of Government Efficiency has discovered huge amounts of money wasted by the government. In 2022, USAID paid Time Magazine for million dollars for them to award Ukrainian President Zelenskyy the title of the person of the year. In 2024, Politico newspaper received over $8,000,000 from USAID. According to Wikileaks, USAID was funding over 6,200 journalists across seven zero seven media outlets and two seventy nine media NGOs. Trump claimed that billions of dollars were spent by the USAID and other government agencies on supporting Democrats and their agenda.
Trump administration believes that such waste of money is detrimental to The US and that USAID needs to be reformed or shut down entirely.